Mativ Holdings, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934.
|
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934.
|
For
the transition period from __________________to __________________
1-13948
(Commission
file number)
SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
62-1612879
|
|
(State or other
jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
100
North Point Center East, Suite 600
|
||
Alpharetta,
Georgia
|
30022
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
code)
|
1-800-514-0186
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated
filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting
company ¨
(Do not
check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
There
were 18,361,113 shares of common stock, par value $0.10 per share, of the
registrant outstanding as of July 30, 2010.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
|||
Part
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
1
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
17
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
29
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
30
|
|
Part
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
30
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
30
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
31
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
31
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
31
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
31
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
32
|
||
GLOSSARY
OF TERMS
|
|||
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
|
|||
EX
10.12.3
|
Amended
and Restated Addendum to Second Amended and Restated Agreement between
Philip Morris Incorporated and Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. for
Fine Paper Supply, effective as of July 1, 2000.
|
||
EX
31.1
|
Section
302 Certification of CEO
|
||
EX
31.2
|
Section
302 Certification of CFO
|
||
EX
32
|
Section
906 Certification of CEO and CFO*
|
||
* These
Section 906 certifications are not being incorporated by reference into
the Form 10-Q filing or otherwise deemed to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange
Commission.
|
PART
I
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT
INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(dollars
in millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
|
Six Month Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$ | 182.9 | $ | 183.3 | $ | 375.9 | $ | 367.4 | ||||||||
Cost
of products sold
|
138.0 | 138.7 | 277.8 | 281.2 | ||||||||||||
Gross
Profit
|
44.9 | 44.6 | 98.1 | 86.2 | ||||||||||||
Selling
expense
|
4.6 | 5.5 | 9.9 | 10.7 | ||||||||||||
Research
expense
|
2.1 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||
General
expense
|
10.6 | 11.6 | 22.6 | 23.1 | ||||||||||||
Total
nonmanufacturing expenses
|
17.3 | 19.3 | 36.6 | 37.8 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring
and impairment expense
|
4.0 | 13.3 | 8.8 | 13.6 | ||||||||||||
Operating
Profit
|
23.6 | 12.0 | 52.7 | 34.8 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
0.6 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
0.3 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Income
Before Income Taxes and Income (Loss) from Equity
Affiliates
|
22.7 | 10.1 | 50.4 | 31.3 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
8.6 | 1.9 | 18.3 | 8.5 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from equity affiliates
|
0.7 | (1.1 | ) | 1.3 | (2.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$ | 14.8 | $ | 7.1 | $ | 33.4 | $ | 20.4 | ||||||||
Net
Income Per Share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.80 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 1.84 | $ | 1.33 | ||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.78 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 1.32 | ||||||||
Cash
Dividends Declared Per Share
|
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.30 | ||||||||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
17,820,200 | 15,175,600 | 17,813,000 | 15,137,400 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
18,137,500 | 15,433,700 | 18,150,100 | 15,299,300 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
1
SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT
INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars
in millions, except per share amounts)
June 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 91.9 | $ | 56.9 | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
83.4 | 85.8 | ||||||
Inventories
|
106.7 | 127.3 | ||||||
Income
taxes receivable
|
5.0 | 23.4 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
11.1 | 6.3 | ||||||
Total
Current Assets
|
298.1 | 299.7 | ||||||
Property,
Plant and Equipment, net
|
371.4 | 401.1 | ||||||
Deferred
Income Tax Benefits
|
13.4 | 17.3 | ||||||
Investment
in Equity Affiliates
|
18.0 | 16.6 | ||||||
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
11.7 | 14.1 | ||||||
Other
Assets
|
46.6 | 43.1 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 759.2 | $ | 791.9 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Current
debt
|
$ | 7.1 | $ | 17.7 | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
49.6 | 46.7 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
89.4 | 115.5 | ||||||
Current
deferred revenue
|
6.0 | 6.0 | ||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
152.1 | 185.9 | ||||||
Long-Term
Debt
|
39.7 | 42.4 | ||||||
Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefits
|
35.5 | 38.4 | ||||||
Deferred
Income Tax Liabilities
|
21.2 | 14.2 | ||||||
Deferred
Revenue
|
3.3 | 7.2 | ||||||
Other
Liabilities
|
19.6 | 21.6 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
271.4 | 309.7 | ||||||
Stockholders’
Equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.10 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or
outstanding
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
stock, $0.10 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 18,679,281 and
18,633,235 shares issued at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively; 18,361,113 and 17,874,885 shares outstanding at June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively...
|
1.9 | 1.9 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
202.9 | 205.7 | ||||||
Common
stock in treasury, at cost, 318,168 and 758,350 shares at June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
(6.2 | ) | (14.0 | ) | ||||
Retained
earnings
|
309.9 | 281.9 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
(20.7 | ) | 6.7 | |||||
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
487.8 | 482.2 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
$ | 759.2 | $ | 791.9 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
2
SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT
INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(dollars
in millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Common Stock Issued
|
Treasury Stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
16,078,733 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 64.6 | 748,953 | $ | (14.1 | ) | $ | 255.9 | $ | (30.6 | ) | $ | 277.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Net
income for the six months ended June 30, 2009
|
20.4 | 20.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments
to unrealized foreign currency translation, net of tax
|
11.6 | 11.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes
in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
4.3 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of postretirement benefit plans’ costs, net of tax
|
1.3 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income, net of tax
|
37.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared ($0.30 per share)
|
(4.6 | ) | (4.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted
stock issuances, net
|
(0.3 | ) | (13,500 | ) | 0.3 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
employee compensation expense
|
3.5 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
effect of stock-based employee compensation expense
|
(0.5 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued to directors as compensation
|
(2,444 | ) | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares for options exercised
|
— | (22,000 | ) | 0.4 | 0.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases
of treasury stock
|
— | — | — | 56,953 | (0.8 | ) | — | — | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2009
|
16,078,733 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 67.3 | 767,962 | $ | (14.1 | ) | $ | 271.7 | $ | (13.4 | ) | $ | 313.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2009
|
18,633,235 | $ | 1.9 | $ | 205.7 | 758,350 | $ | (14.0 | ) | $ | 281.9 | $ | 6.7 | $ | 482.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
income for the six months ended June 30, 2010
|
33.4 | 33.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments
to unrealized foreign currency translation, net of tax
|
(25.6 | ) | (25.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes
in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
(2.9 | ) | (2.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of postretirement benefit plans’ costs, net of tax
|
1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income, net of tax
|
6.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared ($0.30 per share)
|
(5.4 | ) | (5.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted
stock issuances, net
|
(8.6 | ) | (451,973 | ) | 8.6 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
employee compensation expense
|
3.5 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
effect of stock-based employee compensation expense
|
1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued to directors as compensation
|
1,345 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares for options exercised
|
44,701 | 1.1 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases
of treasury stock
|
— | — | — | 11,791 | (0.8 | ) | — | — | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2010
|
18,679,281 | $ | 1.9 | $ | 202.9 | 318,168 | $ | (6.2 | ) | $ | 309.9 | $ | (20.7 | ) | $ | 487.8 |
3
SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT
INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(dollars
in millions)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
|||||||
Operations
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 33.4 | $ | 20.4 | ||||
Non-cash
items included in net income:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
19.9 | 21.9 | ||||||
Restructuring-related
impairment
|
0.4 | — | ||||||
Amortization
of deferred revenue
|
(3.9 | ) | (3.4 | ) | ||||
Deferred
income tax provision
|
11.2 | 5.4 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement benefits
|
1.2 | (3.4 | ) | |||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
3.5 | 3.5 | ||||||
(Income)
loss from equity affiliate
|
(1.3 | ) | 2.4 | |||||
Other
items
|
(1.6 | ) | 0.2 | |||||
Net
changes in operating working capital
|
11.9 | (24.1 | ) | |||||
Cash
Provided by Operations
|
74.7 | 22.9 | ||||||
Investing
|
||||||||
Capital
spending
|
(25.8 | ) | (4.6 | ) | ||||
Capitalized
software costs
|
(6.1 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||
Other
|
2.0 | 0.3 | ||||||
Cash
Used for Investing
|
(29.9 | ) | (6.1 | ) | ||||
Financing
|
||||||||
Cash
dividends paid to SWM stockholders
|
(5.4 | ) | (4.6 | ) | ||||
Changes
in short-term debt
|
1.7 | (6.3 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from issuances of long-term debt
|
48.0 | 12.2 | ||||||
Payments
on long-term debt
|
(55.6 | ) | (23.1 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of treasury stock
|
(0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
1.1 | 0.4 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits of stock-based awards
|
1.1 | (0.5 | ) | |||||
Cash
Used in Financing
|
(9.9 | ) | (22.7 | ) | ||||
Effect
of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
0.1 | 0.3 | ||||||
Increase
(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
35.0 | (5.6 | ) | |||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period
|
56.9 | 11.9 | ||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 91.9 | $ | 6.3 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
4
NOTE
1. GENERAL
Nature
of Business
Schweitzer-Mauduit
International, Inc., or the Company, is a multinational diversified producer of
premium specialty papers headquartered in the United States of America. The
Company manufactures and sells paper and reconstituted tobacco products to the
tobacco industry as well as specialized paper products for use in other
applications. Tobacco industry products comprised approximately 93
percent and 94 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales in the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
primary products in the group include cigarette, plug wrap and base tipping
papers, or Cigarette Papers, used to wrap various parts of a cigarette,
reconstituted tobacco leaf, or RTL, which is used as a blend with virgin tobacco
in cigarettes and reconstituted tobacco wrappers and binders for machine-made
cigars. These products are sold directly to the major tobacco
companies or their designated converters in the Americas, Europe, Asia and
elsewhere. Non-tobacco industry products are a diverse mix of products, certain
of which represent commodity paper grades produced to maximize machine
operations.
The
Company is a manufacturer of high porosity papers, which are used in
manufacturing ventilated cigarettes, banded papers for the production of lower
ignition propensity, or LIP, cigarettes and the leading independent producer of
RTL used in producing blended cigarettes. The Company conducts
business in over 90 countries and currently operates 12 production locations
worldwide, with mills in the United States, France, the Philippines, Indonesia,
Brazil and Poland. The Company also has a 50 percent equity interest
in a paper mill in China.
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
have been prepared in accordance with the instructions of Form 10-Q and Rule
10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC,
and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S.
GAAP. However, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting
of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods.
The
results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010,
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
full year. The unaudited consolidated financial statements
included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated
financial statements and the notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC on March
8, 2010.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
wholly-owned, majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. The
Company’s share of the net income (loss) of its 50 percent owned joint venture
in China is included in the consolidated statements of income as income (loss)
from equity affiliates. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Estimates are used for, but not limited to, inventory valuation, useful lives,
fair values, sales returns, receivables valuation, pension, postretirement and
other benefits, restructuring and impairment, taxes and contingencies. Actual
results could differ materially from those estimates.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Effective
January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the requirements of Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 810, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R” which amends
the accounting guidance for consolidating variable interest entities and
eliminates the concept of qualifying special-purpose entities. The adoption of
this guidance did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
5
NOTE
2. NET INCOME PER SHARE
The
Company uses the two-class method to calculate earnings per share. The Company
has granted restricted stock that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends on
unvested shares. Since these unvested restricted shares are considered
participating securities under the two-class method, the Company allocates
earnings per share to common stock and participating securities according to
dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed
earnings.
Diluted
net income per common share is computed based on net income divided by the
weighted average number of common and potential common shares
outstanding. Potential common shares during the respective periods
are those related to dilutive stock-based compensation, including long-term
share-based incentive compensation, stock options outstanding, and directors’
accumulated deferred stock compensation which may be received by the directors
in the form of stock or cash. A reconciliation of the average number
of common and potential common shares outstanding used in the calculations of
basic and diluted net income per share follows ($ in millions, shares in
thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Numerator
(basic and diluted):
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 14.8 | $ | 7.1 | $ | 33.4 | $ | 20.4 | ||||||||
Less:
Undistributed earnings available to participating
securities
|
(0.1 | ) | — | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||
Less:
Distributed earnings available to participating securities
|
(0.5 | ) | — | (0.6 | ) | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||
Undistributed
and distributed earnings available to common shareholders
|
$ | 14.2 | $ | 7.1 | $ | 32.7 | $ | 20.2 | ||||||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
number of common shares outstanding
|
17,820.2 | 15,175.6 | 17,813.0 | 15,137.4 | ||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive stock-based compensation
|
317.3 | 258.1 | 337.1 | 161.9 | ||||||||||||
Average
number of common and potential common shares outstanding
|
18,137.5 | 15,433.7 | 18,150.1 | 15,299.3 |
Certain
stock options outstanding during the periods presented were not included in the
calculations of diluted net income per share because the exercise prices of the
options were greater than the average market prices of the common shares during
the respective periods. There were no anti-dilutive stock options
during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010. For the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2009, 695,900 and 736,500 share equivalents,
respectively, resulting from anti-dilutive stock options were not included in
the computations of diluted net income per share.
NOTE
3. INVENTORIES
The
following schedule details inventories by major class ($ in
millions):
June 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 30.2 | $ | 35.4 | ||||
Work
in process
|
29.2 | 30.5 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
29.5 | 39.4 | ||||||
Supplies
and other
|
17.8 | 22.0 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 106.7 | $ | 127.3 |
6
NOTE
4. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The
changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for each segment for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 were as follows ($ in millions):
France
|
Brazil
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Balance
as of January 1, 2010
|
$ | 7.9 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 9.0 | ||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
(0.9 | ) | — | (0.9 | ) | |||||||
Balance
as of June 30, 2010
|
$ | 7.0 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 8.1 |
The gross
carrying amount and accumulated amortization for amortizable intangible assets
consisted of the following ($ in millions):
June
30, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization*
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization*
|
Net
Carrying
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Customer-related
intangibles (French Segment)
|
$ | 10.0 | $ | 6.4 | $ | 3.6 | $ | 10.0 | $ | 4.9 | $ | 5.1 |
* Accumulated
amortization also includes adjustments for foreign currency
translation.
Amortization
expense of intangible assets was $0.4 million and $0.9 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $0.5 million and $1.0 million
for the three and six months ended June 20, 2009, respectively. The Company’s
customer-related intangibles are amortized to expense using the 150 percent
declining balance method over a 6-year life. Estimated amortization expense for
the next four years is as follows (in millions of dollars):
2010—$1.9 million, 2011—$1.6 million, 2012—$1.2 million, and
2013—$0.4 million.
NOTE
5. INVESTMENT IN EQUITY AFFILIATE
The
Company’s joint venture with China National Tobacco Corporation, or CNTC, is
China Tobacco Mauduit (Jiangmen) Paper Industry Co. LTD, or CTM. CTM
has two paper machines which produce cigarette paper and porous plug wrap, both
of which started production in 2008. The Company uses the equity method to
account for its 50 percent ownership interest in CTM. At June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the Company’s equity investment in CTM was $18.0 million
and $16.6 million, respectively. The Company’s share of the net income
(loss) of CTM was included in income (loss) from equity affiliates within the
consolidated statements of income. CTM pays to each the Company and CNTC a
2 percent royalty on net sales of cigarette and porous plug wrap papers.
CTM sells its products to CNTC and its subsidiaries.
Below is
summarized balance sheet information as of June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009 and income statement information of the China joint venture for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 ($ in
millions):
Balance Sheet Information
|
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$ | 25.9 | $ | 20.9 | ||||
Noncurrent
assets
|
84.4 | 86.2 | ||||||
Current
debt
|
17.7 | 15.4 | ||||||
Other
current liabilities
|
6.2 | 6.5 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
50.1 | 51.8 | ||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
36.1 | 33.2 |
7
Statement of Operations Information (unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
|||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 8.8 | $ | 3.6 | $ | 16.3 | $ | 6.9 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
3.4 | 0.9 | 6.6 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 1.5 | $ | (2.3 | ) | $ | 2.7 | $ | (4.9 | ) |
NOTE
6. RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
The
Company incurred restructuring expenses of $4.0 million and $8.8 million in
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $13.3
million and $13.6 million in the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2009, respectively, in connection with previously announced restructuring
activities. The following table summarizes the associated cash and
non-cash, pre-tax restructuring expense for the three and six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009 and the associated expense incurred since the 2006 inception
of restructuring activities through June 30, 2010 ($ in millions):
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
Cumulative
|
||||||||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
June 30
|
June 30,
|
2006 to
June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||
France
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
Expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Severance
and other employee related costs
|
$ | 2.9 | $ | 12.4 | $ | 7.6 | $ | 12.4 | $ | 68.0 | ||||||||||
Other
|
— | — | — | — | 0.9 | |||||||||||||||
Non-cash
Expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Accelerated
depreciation
|
— | — | — | — | 21.0 | |||||||||||||||
Other
|
— | 0.8 | — | 1.1 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||
Total
France Restructuring Expense
|
$ | 2.9 | $ | 13.2 | $ | 7.6 | $ | 13.5 | $ | 91.7 | ||||||||||
United
States
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
Expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Severance
and other employee related costs
|
$ | 0.1 | $ | — | $ | 0.1 | $ | — | $ | 3.3 | ||||||||||
Other
|
— | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.0 | |||||||||||||||
Non-cash
Expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Accelerated
depreciation and asset impairment charges
|
0.5 | — | 0.4 | — | 27.1 | |||||||||||||||
(Gain)
Loss on disposal of assets
|
— | — | — | — | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other
|
— | — | — | (0.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total
United States Restructuring Expense
|
$ | 0.6 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 30.4 | ||||||||||
Brazil
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
Expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Severance
and other employee related costs
|
$ | 0.5 | $ | — | $ | 0.5 | $ | — | $ | 2.2 | ||||||||||
Non-cash
Expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Asset
impairment charges
|
— | — | — | — | 1.9 | |||||||||||||||
Total
Brazil Restructuring Expense
|
$ | 0.5 | $ | — | $ | 0.5 | $ | — | $ | 4.1 | ||||||||||
Summary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Cash Expense
|
$ | 3.5 | $ | 12.5 | $ | 8.4 | $ | 12.5 | $ | 75.4 | ||||||||||
Total
Non-cash Expense.
|
0.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 50.8 | |||||||||||||||
Total
Restructuring Expense
|
$ | 4.0 | $ | 13.3 | $ | 8.8 | $ | 13.6 | $ | 126.2 |
8
Restructuring
liabilities were classified within accrued expenses in each of the consolidated
balance sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Changes in
the restructuring liabilities during the six month period ended June 30, 2010
and the year ended December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows ($ in
millions):
Six Months Ended
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Balance
at beginning of year
|
$ | 33.0 | $ | 5.4 | ||||
Accruals
for announced programs
|
8.4 | 36.7 | ||||||
Cash
payments
|
(10.7 | ) | (9.1 | ) | ||||
Exchange
rate impacts
|
(4.8 | ) | — | |||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$ | 25.9 | $ | 33.0 |
NOTE
7. DEBT
Total
debt is summarized in the following table ($ in millions):
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Credit
Agreement
|
||||||||
U.
S. Revolver
|
$ | - | $ | 33.0 | ||||
Euro
Revolver
|
30.6 | 11.5 | ||||||
French
Employee Profit Sharing
|
10.4 | 11.0 | ||||||
Bank
Overdrafts
|
2.8 | 2.5 | ||||||
Other
|
3.0 | 2.1 | ||||||
Total
Debt
|
46.8 | 60.1 | ||||||
Less:
Current debt
|
7.1 | 17.7 | ||||||
Long-Term
Debt
|
$ | 39.7 | $ | 42.4 |
Credit
Agreement
The
Company’s Credit Agreement provides for maximum borrowings of $95 million under
its U.S. dollar revolving credit facility, or U.S. Revolver, and 80 million
euros under its euro revolving credit facility, or Euro
Revolver. Availability under the U.S. Revolver increased to $95
million as of June 30, 2010 from $62.0 million as of December 31,
2009. Availability under the Euro Revolver decreased to 55.0 million
euros, or $67.3 million, as of June 30, 2010 from 72.0 million euros, or $103.8
million, as of December 31, 2009.
As of
December 31, 2009, the applicable interest rate on the U.S. Revolver was 0.6%.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the applicable interest rate on the Euro
Revolver was 0.8 %.
The
Credit Agreement contains representations and warranties which are customary for
facilities of this type and covenants and provisions that, among other things,
require the Company to maintain (a) a net debt to equity ratio not to exceed 1.0
and (b) a net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio not to exceed 3.0. Under
the Credit Agreement, interest rates are at market rates, based on the London
Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, for U.S. dollar borrowings and the Euro
Interbank Offered Rate, or EURIBOR, for euro borrowings, plus an applicable
margin that varies from 0.35% to 0.75% per annum depending on the Net Debt to
Adjusted EBITDA Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement. The
Company incurs commitment fees at an annual rate of either 0.30% or 0.35% of the
applicable margin on the committed amounts not drawn, depending on the Net Debt
to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio as defined in the Credit Agreement. The
Company also incurs utilization fees of 0.25% per annum when outstanding
borrowings exceed 50% of the total credit facility.
9
French
Employee Profit Sharing
At June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, debt of $10.4 million and $11.0 million,
respectively, consists of obligations of the French operations related to
government-mandated profit sharing. Each year, representatives of the workers at
each of the French businesses can make an election for the profit sharing
amounts from the most recent year ended to invest the funds in a financial
institution or to invest the funds with their respective employer. To the extent
the funds are invested with the Company, these amounts bear interest at the
5-year treasury note rate in France, 3.82% and 3.97% at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, and are generally payable in the fifth year
subsequent to the year the profit sharing is accrued.
Bank
Overdrafts and Other
The
Company had bank overdraft facilities of $31.5 million and $33.9 million as of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, of which $28.7 million and
$31.4 million was available at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively.
Other
debt consists of non-interest bearing French segment debt with deferred capital
repayment from governmental and commercial institutions primarily related to
environmental capital improvements and debt in the Philippines.
Interest
Expense and Rate Swap Agreements
The
Company capitalized $0.1 million of interest expense in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 due to the ongoing construction of a new RTL facility in the
Philippines.
The
Company maintains interest rate swap agreements on portions of its long-term
debt. As a result, as of June 30, 2010, the LIBOR rates on $33.0
million of the Company’s variable-rate long-term debt were fixed at 2.1 %
through March 2012. The impact of the swap agreements on the consolidated
financial statements was not material for the three and six months ended June
30, 2010. See Note 8. Derivatives for more information.
NOTE
8. DERIVATIVES
In the
normal course of business, the Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange
rate risk and interest rate risk on its variable-rate debt. To manage these
risks, the Company utilizes a variety of practices including, where considered
appropriate, derivative instruments. The Company has no derivative instruments
for trading or speculative purposes nor any derivatives with credit risk related
contingent features. All derivative instruments used by the Company are either
exchange traded or are entered into with major financial institutions in order
to reduce credit risk and risk of nonperformance by third parties. The fair
values of the Company’s derivative instruments are determined using observable
inputs and are considered Level 2 assets or liabilities.
The
Company utilizes currency forward, swap and, to a lesser extent, option
contracts to selectively hedge its exposure to foreign currency transaction risk
when it is practical and economical to do so. The use of these contracts
minimizes transactional exposure to exchange rate changes. Usually, these
contracts extend for no more than 12 months. We designate certain of our foreign
currency hedges as cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair value of cash flow
hedges are reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and
reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. For
foreign exchange contracts not designated as cash flow hedges, changes in the
contracts’ fair value are recorded to net income each period.
The
Company selectively hedges its exposure to interest rate increases on
variable-rate, long-term debt when it is practical and economical to do so. The
Company utilizes various forms of interest rate hedge agreements, including
interest rate swap agreements, typically with contractual terms no longer than
24 months. Changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps are recorded to
net income each period. See Note 7, Debt for more information about our interest
rate swaps.
10
The
following table presents the fair value of asset and liability derivatives and
the respective balance sheet locations at June 30, 2010 ($ in
millions):
Asset Derivatives
|
Liability Derivatives
|
||||||||||
Balance Sheet
Location
|
Fair
Value
|
Balance Sheet
Location
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||
Derivatives
designated as hedges:
|
|||||||||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
$ | 3.9 |
Accounts
Payable
|
$ | — | |||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
Other
Assets
|
0.4 |
Other
Liabilities
|
0.1 | |||||||
Total
derivatives designated as hedges
|
4.3 | 0.1 | |||||||||
Derivatives
not designated as hedges:
|
|||||||||||
Interest
rate contracts
|
Other
Assets
|
— |
Other
Liabilities
|
0.8 | |||||||
Total
derivatives not designated as hedges
|
— | 0.8 | |||||||||
Total
derivatives
|
$ | 4.3 | $ | 0.9 |
The
following table presents the fair value of asset and liability derivatives and
the respective balance sheet locations at December 31, 2009 ($ in
millions):
Asset Derivatives
|
Liability Derivatives
|
||||||||||
Balance Sheet
Location
|
Fair
Value
|
Balance Sheet
Location
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||
Derivatives
designated as hedges:
|
|||||||||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
$ | 7.3 |
Accounts
Payable
|
$ | — | |||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
Other
Assets
|
1.5 |
Other
Liabilities
|
— | |||||||
Total
derivatives designated as hedges
|
8.8 | — | |||||||||
Derivatives
not designated as hedges:
|
|||||||||||
Interest
rate contracts
|
Other
Assets
|
— |
Other
Liabilities
|
0.4 | |||||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
— |
Accounts
Payable
|
0.2 | |||||||
Total
derivatives not designated as hedges
|
— | 0.6 | |||||||||
Total
derivatives
|
$ | 8.8 | $ | 0.6 |
The
following tables provide the effect derivative instruments in cash flow hedging
relationships had on accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), or AOCI, and
results of operations ($ in millions):
The Effect of Cash Flow Hedge Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Income
for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||
Change in
AOCI
Gain /
(Loss)
|
Location of Gain
/(Loss)
reclassified from
AOCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
|
Gain /(Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI
into Income
(Effective
Portion)
|
Location of Gain /
(Loss) Recognized in
Income (Ineffective
Portion and Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
|
Gain / (Loss)
Recognized in
Income (Ineffective
Portion and
Amount excluded
from Effectiveness
Testing)
|
||||||||||
Derivatives
designated as hedges:
|
||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended:
|
||||||||||||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
$ | (0.7 | ) |
Net
Sales
|
$ | 1.7 |
Other
Income/ (Expense)
|
$ | — | |||||
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
$ | (2.9 | ) |
Net
Sales
|
$ | 3.4 |
Other
Income/ (Expense)
|
$ | — |
11
The Effect of Cash Flow Hedge Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Income
for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||
Change in
AOCI
Gain /
(Loss)
|
Location of Gain
/(Loss)
reclassified from
AOCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
|
Gain /(Loss)
Reclassified
from AOCI
into Income
(Effective
Portion)
|
Location of Gain /
(Loss) Recognized in
Income (Ineffective
Portion and Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
|
Gain / (Loss)
Recognized in
Income (Ineffective
Portion and
Amount excluded
from Effectiveness
Testing)
|
||||||||||
Derivatives
designated as hedges:
|
||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
$ | 4.0 |
Net
Sales
|
$ | 0.4 |
Other
Income/ (Expense)
|
$ | — | ||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
$ | 4.3 |
Net
Sales
|
$ | 0.1 |
Other
Income/ (Expense)
|
$ | — |
The
following tables provide the effect derivative instruments not designated as
hedging instruments had on net income ($ in millions):
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments
|
Location of Gain / (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivatives
|
Amount of Gain / (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives for the Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate contracts
|
Other
Income / Expense
|
$ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 0.2 | ||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
Other
Income / Expense
|
(0.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | |||||
Total
|
(0.2 | ) | $ | — |
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments
|
Location of Gain / (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivatives
|
Amount of Gain / (Loss) Recognized in Income on
Derivatives for the Six Months Ended
|
||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate contracts
|
Other
Income / Expense
|
$ | (0.4 | ) | $ | 0.3 | ||||
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
Other
Income / Expense
|
(0.1 | ) | (0.7 | ) | |||||
Total
|
$ | (0.5 | ) | $ | (0.4 | ) |
NOTE
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
The
Company is involved in various legal proceedings and disputes (see Note 16,
Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009). Except as noted below, there have been no material
developments to these matters during 2010.
On March
31, 2010, the City of Pontiac General Employees’ Retirement System, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, sued Schweitzer-Mauduit
International, Inc., its Chief Executive Officer, Frédéric P. Villoutreix, and
its Chief Financial Officer, Peter J. Thompson, in the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Georgia for alleged violations of certain
sections and rules of the Securities Act of 1934. The plaintiffs’ identified a
putative class period covering August 5, 2009 to February 10,
2010. The primary allegations of the suit contend that the defendants
misrepresented the strength of the Company’s competitive position in the U.S.
and its ability to withstand European competition, particularly in the area of
lower ignition propensity papers. Further, the complaint alleges that the
defendants concealed threats to the Company’s relationship with Phillip Morris
USA, Inc. As a consequence of these alleged misrepresentations or
omissions, the plaintiffs contend that the Company’s stock price was
artificially inflated causing the plaintiffs to be damaged in an unspecified
amount. The Company believes that the allegations are without merit as to all
defendants and intends to vigorously defend the matter as to itself and its two
officers. The Company believes the outcome of this litigation will not have a
material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition.
12
Imposto sobre Circulação de
Mercadorias e Serviços, or ICMS
As
previously disclosed in our filing on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, in January 2010, the State of Rio de Janeiro attempted to execute a tax
foreclosure to collect Assessment 2001.001.064544.6. The Company
responded by filing two actions, one in the court of the State of Rio de Janeiro
to stay the tax foreclosure and a second action for a writ of prevention filed
with the Supreme Court of Brazil.
On May
27, 2010, the State of Rio de Janeiro imposed a freeze of SWM-B’s bank
accounts. In June 2010, the Supreme Court of Brazil granted the writ of
prevention and stayed the execution of the tax foreclosure by the State of Rio
de Janeiro. On July 1, 2010, based on the Supreme Court’s order granting
the writ of prevention, the local court in Pirahy removed the freeze imposed on
SWM-B’s bank accounts. Based on the foreign currency exchange rate at
June 30, 2010, the Assessment totaled approximately $30 million, of which
approximately $14 million is covered by indemnification. No liability has been
recorded in our consolidated financial statements for the Assessment based on
our evaluation that SWM-B is more likely than not to prevail in its challenge of
the Assessment under the facts and law as presently understood.
Environmental
Matters
The
Company’s operations are subject to federal, state and local laws, regulations
and ordinances relating to various environmental matters. The nature
of the Company’s operations exposes it to the risk of claims with respect to
environmental matters, and there can be no assurance that material costs or
liabilities will not be incurred in connection with such
claims. While the Company has incurred in the past several years, and
will continue to incur, capital
and operating expenditures in order to comply with environmental laws and
regulations, it believes that its future cost of compliance with environmental
laws, regulations and ordinances, and its exposure to liability for
environmental claims and its obligation to participate in the remediation and
monitoring of certain hazardous waste disposal
sites, or as a result of environmental remediation associated with any of its
plant closures, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial
condition or results of operations. However, future events, such as
changes in existing laws and regulations, or future claims for remediation of
contamination of sites presently or previously owned, operated or used for waste
disposal by the Company (including contamination caused by prior owners and
operators of such sites or other waste generators) may give rise to additional
costs which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or
results of operations.
Purchase
Obligations
We expect
to spend approximately $25 million for equipment to make LIP cigarette papers in
Europe, of which approximately $11.9 million is under contract and will be paid
during 2010.
Other
In
Brazil, we are currently generating more value-added tax credits than we
utilize. As of June, 30, 2010, these credits totaled $11.8 million
and are classified in other assets in the consolidated balance
sheet. We have applied on behalf of the paper industry in the State
of Rio de Janeiro for a special government action to enable more rapid
utilization of these credits. We expect approval and, if successful,
this and other actions should allow our Brazilian operation to utilize more
credits than it generates on an annual basis. These credits do not expire;
however, if the special action is not obtained, we may record an allowance for
substantially all of the current balance.
The
Company has been advised by Philip Morris – USA that it disputes the manner in
which the Company has calculated costs for banded cigarette papers under a
cost-plus based contract for this product. Currently, the disputed
amount is approximately $15.8 million. While the Company believes
that it has properly calculated the amount it invoiced, the ultimate resolution
of this dispute, if unfavorable to the Company, could have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s results of operations.
NOTE
10. POSTRETIREMENT AND OTHER BENEFITS
The
Company sponsors pension benefits in the United States, France, the Philippines
and Canada and postretirement healthcare and life insurance, or OPEB, benefits
in the United States and Canada. The Company’s Canadian and
Philippines pension and OPEB benefits are not material and therefore are not
included in the following disclosures.
13
Pension
and OPEB Benefits
The
components of net pension and OPEB benefit costs for U.S. employees and net
pension benefit costs for French employees during the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows ($ in
millions):
Three Months Ended June 30
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Pension Benefits
|
French Pension Benefits
|
U.S. OPEB Benefits
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.2 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Interest
cost
|
1.6 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(2.2 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortizations
and other
|
0.8 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 0.2 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 1.0 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.2 |
Six Months Ended June 30
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Pension Benefits
|
French Pension Benefits
|
U.S. OPEB Benefits
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.4 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Interest
cost
|
3.2 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(4.4 | ) | (3.2 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (0.4 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortizations
and other
|
1.6 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 0.4 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 2.0 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.4 |
During
the full-year 2010, the Company expects to recognize approximately $3.3 million
for amortization of accumulated other comprehensive loss related to its U.S.
pension and OPEB plans and approximately $0.3 million for its French pension
plans.
The
Company did not make any contributions to its pension plans during the six
months ended June 30, 2010. The Company paid $0.3 million and $0.5
million during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, for its U.S. OPEB benefits and expects to pay a total of $1 to $2
million during the full-year 2010 for such benefits.
NOTE
11. INCOME TAXES
Income
before income taxes was $22.7 million and $50.4 million for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $10.1 million and $31.3
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively.
A
reconciliation of income taxes computed at the U.S. federal statutory income tax
rate to the provision (benefit) for income taxes is as follows ($ in
millions):
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
provision at U.S. statutory rate
|
$ | 7.9 | 35.0 | % | $ | 3.6 | 35.0 | % | $ | 17.6 | 35.0 | % | $ | 11.0 | 35.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefits of foreign legal structure
|
(0.1 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (8.9 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (1.2 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (5.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
French
tax classification change
|
0.6 | 2.6 | — | — | 1.2 | 2.4 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other,
net.
|
0.2 | 0.9 | (0.8 | ) | (7.3 | ) | 0.1 | 0.1 | (0.8 | ) | (2.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
$ | 8.6 | 37.9 | % | $ | 1.9 | 18.8 | % | $ | 18.3 | 36.3 | % | $ | 8.5 | 27.2 | % |
Tax
benefits of foreign legal structure result from net foreign tax deductions from
the restructuring of the Company’s foreign operations in 2003. The
proportionate effect of this item on the overall effective income tax rate
decreases as earnings increase. The benefit of the foreign holding structure was
lower in the three months ended June 30, 2010 due to a significant change in the
value of the euro versus the U.S. dollar. A French tax law change, effective
January 1, 2010, resulted in a certain tax which was previously a business tax
now being classified as an income tax for U.S. GAAP accounting
purposes.
At June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had no significant unrecognized tax
benefits related to income taxes.
The
Company’s policy with respect to penalties and interest in connection with
income tax assessments or related to unrecognized tax benefits is to classify
penalties as provision for income taxes and interest as interest expense in its
consolidated income statement. There were no material income tax
penalties or interest accrued during any of the three or six month periods ended
June 30, 2010 or 2009.
14
The
Company files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal and several state
jurisdictions as well as in many foreign jurisdictions. With certain
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal, state and local,
or foreign income tax examinations for years before 2006.
NOTE
12. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
Company operates and manages three reportable segments: United
States, or U.S., France and Brazil. These segments are based on the
geographical location of the Company’s manufacturing
operations. These business segments manufacture and sell Cigarette
Papers used to wrap various parts of a cigarette and reconstituted tobacco
products, as well as certain non-tobacco industry products. While the
products are similar in each segment, they vary based on customer requirements
and the manufacturing capabilities of each of the operations. Sales
by a segment into markets primarily served by a different segment occur where
specific product needs cannot be cost-effectively met by the manufacturing
operations domiciled in that segment.
The
accounting policies of these segments are the same as those described in Note 2,
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The Company primarily evaluates segment
performance and allocates resources based on operating profit and cash
flow.
For
purposes of the segment disclosure in the following tables, the term “United
States” includes operations in the United States and Canada. The
Canadian operations only produce flax fiber used as raw material in the U.S.
operations. The term “France” includes operations in France, the
Philippines and Indonesia because the results of the Philippine and Indonesian
operations are not material for segment reporting purposes and their sales are
integrated with sales of the Company’s French operations in southeast
Asia. Sales of products between segments are made at market prices
and elimination of these sales is referred to in the following tables as
intersegment sales. Expense amounts not associated with segments are
referred to as unallocated expenses.
Net
Sales
($ in
millions)
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France
|
$ | 102.8 | 56.2 | % | $ | 111.9 | 61.0 | % | $ | 217.1 | 57.8 | % | $ | 223.5 | 60.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
70.8 | 38.7 | 63.9 | 34.9 | 139.7 | 37.2 | 129.8 | 35.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brazil
|
21.2 | 11.6 | 19.0 | 10.4 | 40.7 | 10.8 | 37.1 | 10.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
194.8 | 106.5 | 194.8 | 106.3 | 397.5 | 105.8 | 390.4 | 106.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment
sales by
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France
|
(6.1 | ) | (3.3 | ) | (5.5 | ) | (3.0 | ) | (10.1 | ) | (2.7 | ) | (8.9 | ) | (2.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
(0.5 | ) | (0.3 | ) | — | — | (0.7 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (1.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Brazil
|
(5.3 | ) | (2.9 | ) | (6.0 | ) | (3.3 | ) | (10.8 | ) | (2.9 | ) | (12.9 | ) | (3.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
(11.9 | ) | (6.5 | ) | (11.5 | ) | (6.3 | ) | (21.6 | ) | (5.8 | ) | (23.0 | ) | (6.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 182.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 183.3 | 100.0 | % | $ | 375.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 367.4 | 100.0 | % |
15
Operating
Profit
($ in
millions)
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France
|
$ | 12.3 | 52.1 | % | $ | 1.2 | 10.0 | % | $ | 27.6 | 52.4 | % | $ | 14.2 | 40.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
14.8 | 62.7 | 12.5 | 104.2 | 31.4 | 59.6 | 25.5 | 73.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brazil
|
0.2 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 23.3 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 5.4 | 15.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unallocated
|
(3.7 | ) | (15.7 | ) | (4.5 | ) | (37.5 | ) | (7.7 | ) | (14.6 | ) | (10.3 | ) | (29.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 23.6 | 100.0 | % | $ | 12.0 | 100.0 | % | $ | 52.7 | 100.0 | % | $ | 34.8 | 100.0 | % |
16
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion of our
results of operations, current financial position and cash flows. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and the
audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and the selected
financial data included in Item 6 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The discussion of our results of operations and
financial position includes various forward-looking statements about our
markets, the demand for our products and our future results. These statements
are based on certain assumptions that we consider reasonable. For information
about risks and exposures relating to our business and our company, you should
read the section entitled “Factors That May Affect Future Results” included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009. Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to
“we,” “us,” “our,” or similar terms
include Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and our consolidated
subsidiaries.
Executive
Summary
($
in millions, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 182.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 183.3 | 100.0 | % | $ | 375.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 367.4 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
44.9 | 24.5 | 44.6 | 24.3 | 98.1 | 26.1 | 86.2 | 23.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring
& impairment expense
|
4.0 | 2.2 | 13.3 | 7.3 | 8.8 | 2.3 | 13.6 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
profit
|
23.6 | 12.9 | 12.0 | 6.5 | 52.7 | 14.0 | 34.8 | 9.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
0.6 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 3.1 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
14.8 | 8.1 | % | 7.1 | 3.9 | % | 33.4 | 8.9 | % | 20.4 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.78 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 1.32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
provided by operations
|
$ | 43.3 | $ | 11.1 | $ | 74.7 | $ | 22.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital
spending
|
$ | 15.9 | $ | 2.0 | $ | 25.8 | $ | 4.6 |
Second
Quarter Highlights
Net sales
were $182.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010, a 0.2 percent
decrease from the prior-year quarter. Net sales decreased $0.4
million as a result of $6.9 million in lower sales from our Malaucène, France
facility which ceased operations in 2009 and $0.6 million in unfavorable foreign
currency exchange rate impacts. These decreases were partially offset by $3.8
million impact from higher sales volumes and $3.3 million in an improved mix of
products sold and higher selling prices.
Gross
profit was $44.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of
$0.3 million from the prior-year quarter. The gross profit margin was
24.5 percent, increased from 24.3 percent in the prior-year
quarter. Restructuring and impairment expenses were $4.0 million and
$13.3 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Operating profit was $23.6 million in the three month
period ended June 30, 2010 versus $12.0 million in the prior-year
quarter. The higher gross profit and operating profit were both
primarily due to $5.0 million in cost savings and $1.6 million in improved
manufacturing costs. These benefits were partially offset by $4.7 million in
higher inflationary costs primarily from higher wood pulp and $2.1 million from
an unfavorable mix of products sold. Operating profit was favorably impacted by
a reduction in restructuring expense of $9.3 million,
In the
second quarter of 2010, interest expense compared to prior-year quarter declined
as a result of lower average debt levels and lower interest rates. SWM net
income and diluted net income per share improved versus the prior-year by $7.7
million and $0.33 per share, respectively.
17
Capital
spending was $15.9 million and $2.0 million during the three months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in capital spending was
primarily due to $4.5 million to establish LIP production capability in the
European Union, or EU, and initial construction spending of $6.4 million for a
new RTL production facility included in the 2010 period.
Year-to-Date
Highlights
Net sales
were $375.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010, a 2.3 percent
increase over the prior-year period. Net sales increased $8.5 million
as a result of $13.3 million due to an improved mix of products sold and higher
selling prices, $8.7 million in favorable foreign currency exchange rate impacts
and $3.8 million in higher volumes. These increases were partially offset by
$17.3 million in lower sales from our Malaucène, France facility which ceased
operations in 2009.
Gross
profit was $98.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of
$11.9 million from the prior-year period. The gross profit margin was
26.1 percent, an increase from 24.3 percent in the prior-year
period. Restructuring and impairment expenses were $8.8 million and
$13.6 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Operating profit was $52.7 million in the six month
period ended June 30, 2010 versus $34.8 million in the prior-year
period. After the $4.8 million reduction in restructuring expense,
the higher gross profit and operating profit were both primarily due to $8.7
million in cost savings and $5.1 million in improved manufacturing costs and
$2.7 million from a favorable mix of products sold and higher selling prices.
These benefits were partially offset by $6.4 million in higher inflationary
costs primarily from higher wood pulp.
Interest
expense was lower by $2.1 million as a result of lower average debt levels and
lower interest rates. SWM net income and diluted net income per share improved
versus the prior-year by $13.0 million and $0.48 per share,
respectively.
Capital
spending was $25.8 million and $4.6 million during the six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in capital spending was
primarily due to $7.9 million to establish LIP production capability in the
European Union, or EU, and initial construction spending of $9.8 million for a
new RTL production facility included in the 2010 period.
Recent
Developments
Lower
Ignition Propensity Cigarettes
The
Company is establishing capacity to produce its proprietary Alginex® LIP
cigarette paper in up to three European locations in advance of EU regulations
requiring cigarettes to be LIP compliant, which are expected to become effective
during 2011. The three locations will include a third-party
manufacturing facility in Belgium, a new wholly-owned operation in Łódź, Poland and a
potential third operation at the Company’s paper manufacturing facility,
Papeteries de Mauduit (PdM), located in Quimperlé, France. The Łódź facility,
called SWM-Poland, is expected to be the main production center of LIP solutions
for the Company in Europe and can be readily expanded in capacity beyond the
initial planned level. It is projected to be operational in November
2010 upon completion of equipment installation and building modification
investments which are estimated to be approximately $25 million. Project costs
through June 30, 2010 were $7.9 million.
RTL
Philippines Construction
Construction
of the Company’s greenfield RTL facility in the Philippines progressed according
to schedule and operations are still expected to commence in late 2011.
Primary activities included fabrication of key equipment components and
construction activity primarily concentrated on the facility’s foundation.
Project costs through June 30, 2010 were $13.7 million. Projections for
total project costs remain consistent with initial estimates at approximately
$117 million. Upcoming activity will continue to be focused on site
construction and equipment fabrication.
These
investments will be funded from existing credit facilities and available
cash.
18
Three Months Ended June 30,
2010 Compared with the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Net Sales
|
Three Months Ended
|
Consolidated
Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions)
|
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
Change
|
Percent
Change
|
Volume
Change
|
|||||||||||||||
France
|
$ | 102.8 | $ | 111.9 | $ | (9.1 | ) | (8.1 | )% | (1.1 | )% | |||||||||
United
States
|
70.8 | 63.9 | 6.9 | 10.8 | 9.8 | |||||||||||||||
Brazil
|
21.2 | 19.0 | 2.2 | 11.6 | 14.1 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
194.8 | 194.8 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
(11.9 | ) | (11.5 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 182.9 | $ | 183.3 | $ | (0.4 | ) | (0.2 | )% | 2.3 | % |
Net sales
were $182.9 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2010 compared with
$183.3 million in the prior-year quarter. The decrease of $0.4
million, or 0.2%, consisted of the following ($ in millions):
Amount
|
Percent
|
|||||||
Changes
due to Malaucène closure
|
$ | (6.9 | ) | (3.8 | )% | |||
Changes
in currency exchange rates
|
(0.6 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Changes
due to volume
|
3.8 | 2.1 | ||||||
Changes
in product mix and selling prices
|
3.3 | 1.8 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | (0.4 | ) | (0.2 | )% |
|
·
|
Closing
the Malaucène facility had a $6.9 million unfavorable impact on net
sales.
|
|
·
|
Changes
in currency exchange rates had an unfavorable impact on net sales of $0.6
million, or 0.3 percent, in the three month period ended June 30, 2010 and
primarily reflected the impact of a weaker euro compared with the U.S.
dollar in the second quarter of 2010 versus the prior-year
quarter.
|
|
·
|
A
sales mix which included a higher proportion of high-value products,
including cigarette paper for LIP cigarettes, and higher selling prices
had a favorable impact of $3.3 million, or 1.8 percent, on net
sales.
|
|
·
|
Unit
sales volumes increased by 2.3 percent in the three month period ended
June 30, 2010 versus the prior-year quarter resulting in a $3.8 million
favorable impact on net sales.
|
|
o
|
Sales
volumes for the French segment decreased by 1.1 percent, primarily as a
result of the closure of the Malaucène
mill.
|
|
o
|
Sales
volumes in the United States increased by 9.8 percent, reflecting
increased sales of LIP-related
products.
|
|
o
|
Brazil
experienced increased sales volumes of 14.1 percent as the result of
increased sales of certain tobacco-related
products.
|
French segment net sales of
$102.8 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2010 decreased by $9.1
million, or 8.1%, versus $111.9 million in the prior-year
quarter. The decrease in net sales was primarily the result of
closing our facility in Malaucène, France, a weaker euro relative to the U.S.
dollar and lower average selling prices and unfavorable mix of
products.
The U.S. segment net sales of
$70.8 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2010 increased by $6.9
million, or 10.8%, compared with $63.9 million in the prior-year
quarter. The increase in net sales of the U.S. segment resulted from
an improved mix of products sold and higher selling prices.
The Brazil segment net sales
of $21.2 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2010 increased by $2.2
million, or 11.6%, from $19.0 million in the prior-year quarter. The
change was primarily due to the favorable currency translation impacts on net
sales from a stronger Brazilian real.
Gross
Profit
(dollars
in millions)
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
Change
|
Percent
Change
|
Percent of Net Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$ | 182.9 | $ | 183.3 | $ | (0.4 | ) | (0.2 | )% | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost
of products sold
|
138.0 | 138.7 | (0.7 | ) | (0.5 | ) | 75.5 | 75.7 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross
Profit
|
$ | 44.9 | $ | 44.6 | $ | 0.3 | 0.7 | % | 24.5 | % | 24.3 | % |
19
Gross
profit was $44.9 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2010, an
increase of $0.3 million from $44.6 million in the prior-year
quarter. The gross profit margin was 24.5% of net sales in the three
month period ended June 30, 2010, increased from 24.3% in the prior-year
quarter. Gross profit was favorably impacted by benefits of cost savings
programs and improved mill operations.
Inflationary
cost increases, primarily related to higher per ton wood pulp prices, had an
unfavorable impact on operating expenses of $4.7 million during the three month
period ended June 30, 2010 compared with the prior-year quarter. The
average per ton list price of northern bleached softwood kraft pulp in the
United States was $990 per metric ton during the three month period ended June
30, 2010 compared with $645 per metric ton during the prior-year
quarter.
Nonmanufacturing
Expenses
(dollars
in millions)
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
Change
|
Percent
Change
|
Percent of Net Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling
expense
|
$ | 4.6 | $ | 5.5 | $ | (0.9 | ) | (16.4 | )% | 2.5 | % | 3.0 | % | |||||||||||
Research
expense
|
2.1 | 2.2 | (0.1 | ) | (4.5 | ) | 1.2 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||
General
expense
|
10.6 | 11.6 | (1.0 | ) | (8.6 | ) | 5.8 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Nonmanufacturing
expenses
|
$ | 17.3 | $ | 19.3 | $ | (2.0 | ) | (10.4 | )% | 9.5 | % | 10.5 | % |
Nonmanufacturing
expenses decreased by $2.0 million, or 10.4%, to $17.3 million from $19.3
million in the prior-year quarter, primarily due to lower incentive compensation
accruals. Nonmanufacturing expenses were 9.5% and 10.5% of net sales
in the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Restructuring
and Impairment Expense
Total
restructuring and impairment expense of $4.0 million was recognized during the
three month period ended June 30, 2010, primarily for French severance expenses
at PdM and Malaucène being recorded over the remaining service period of
affected employees. Total restructuring and impairment expense of $13.3 million
was recognized during the prior-year quarter which was comprised of $12.5
million for severance-related and other cash costs and $0.8 million for other
non-cash charges.
Operating
Profit
($ in
millions)
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
Return on Net
Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||
France
|
$ | 12.3 | $ | 1.2 | $ | 11.1 | 12.0 | % | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||
United
States
|
14.8 | 12.5 | 2.3 | 20.9 | 19.6 | |||||||||||||||
Brazil
|
0.2 | 2.8 | (2.6 | ) | 0.9 | 14.7 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
27.3 | 16.5 | 10.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Unallocated
expenses
|
(3.7 | ) | (4.5 | ) | 0.8 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 23.6 | $ | 12.0 | $ | 11.6 | 12.9 | % | 6.5 | % |
Operating
profit was $23.6 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2010 compared
with $12.0 million during the prior-year quarter. Operating results
were higher in France and the U.S. but lower in Brazil.
The French segment’s
operating profit was $12.3 million in the three month period ended June 30,
2010, an increase of $11.1 million from $1.2 million in the prior-year
quarter. The increase was primarily due to:
|
·
|
Lower
restructuring expense of $10.3
million
|
|
·
|
Improved
mill operations and benefits of cost savings
programs
|
|
·
|
These
positive factors were partially offset by $3.1 million in unfavorable
product mix and lower prices on certain tobacco-related papers and $2.8
million in higher inflationary costs, primarily from wood
pulp
|
The U.S. segment’s operating
profit was $14.8 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2010, a $2.3
million increase from operating profit of $12.5 million in the prior-year
quarter. The increase was primarily due to:
20
|
·
|
Improved
mill operations and benefits of cost savings
programs
|
|
·
|
Higher
sales volumes had a favorable $1.5 million
impact
|
Brazil’s operating profit was
$0.2 million during the three month period ended June 30, 2010, compared with a
$2.8 million during the prior-year quarter. The decreased operating
profit was primarily due to:
|
·
|
Higher
inflationary costs of $1.1 million
|
|
·
|
Higher
manufacturing costs, including $0.5 million in restructuring
expenses
|
|
·
|
These
factors were partially offset by the benefits of cost savings
programs
|
Non-Operating
Expenses
Interest
expense of $0.6 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2010 decreased
from $1.3 million in the prior-year quarter. Average debt levels were
lower during the three month period ended June 30, 2010 versus the prior-year
quarter, and our weighted average effective interest rate was
lower. The weighted average effective interest rates on our debt
facilities were approximately 1.7% and 2.0% for the three month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Other
expense, net was $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the three month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily due to foreign currency
transaction impacts.
Income
Taxes
The
provision for income taxes in the three month period ended June 30, 2010
reflected an effective tax rate of 37.9% compared with 18.8% in the prior-year
quarter. The difference in effective tax rates was primarily due to
higher absolute levels of taxable earnings which reduced the percentage benefit
on the effective tax rate of our foreign holding company tax structure and a
French law, effective January 1, 2010, which changed a business tax to an income
tax for U.S. GAAP accounting purposes. The benefit of the foreign holding
company structure was lower in the three months ended June 30, 2010 than the
prior-year quarter due to the significant change in value of the euro versus the
U.S. dollar.
Income
(Loss) from Equity Affiliates
Income
from equity affiliates was $0.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared with a loss of $1.1 million during the three months ended June 30,
2009. These results reflected the operations of our joint venture in
China. The joint venture’s sales volume and production yields increased during
the second quarter 2010 compared to the prior-year quarter when it was still in
the early stages of its operations.
Net
Income and Income per Share
Net
income for the three month period ended June 31, 2010 was $14.8 million, or
$0.78 per diluted share, compared with $7.1 million, or $0.45 per share, during
the prior-year quarter. The increase in net income in 2010 was
primarily due to an increase in mix to higher-value products, higher average
selling prices and benefits of cost savings programs including strategic actions
taken over the last four years to restructure the business.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2010 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
Six Months Ended
|
Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in millions)
|
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
Percent
|
Volume
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2010
|
Change
|
Change
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||||
France
|
$ | 217.1 | $ | 223.5 | $ | (6.4 | ) | (2.9 | )% | 1.9 | % | |||||||||
United
States
|
139.7 | 129.8 | 9.9 | 7.6 | 3.6 | |||||||||||||||
Brazil
|
40.7 | 37.1 | 3.6 | 9.7 | 6.8 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
397.5 | 390.4 | 7.1 | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
(21.6 | ) | (23.0 | ) | 1.4 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 375.9 | $ | 367.4 | $ | 8.5 | 2.3 | % | 2.8 | % |
Net sales
were $375.9 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 compared with
$367.4 million in the prior-year period. The increase of $8.5
million, or 2.3%, consisted of the following ($ in millions):
21
Amount
|
Percent
|
|||||||
Changes
in product mix and selling prices
|
$ | 13.3 | 3.6 | % | ||||
Changes
in currency exchange rates
|
8.7 | 2.4 | ||||||
Changes
due to volume
|
3.8 | 1.0 | ||||||
Changes
due to Malaucène closure
|
(17.3 | ) | (4.7 | ) | ||||
Total
|
$ | 8.5 | 2.3 | % |
|
·
|
A
sales mix which included a higher proportion of high-value products,
including cigarette paper for LIP cigarettes, and higher selling prices
had a favorable impact of $13.3 million, or 3.6 percent, on net
sales.
|
|
·
|
Changes
in currency exchange rates had a favorable impact on net sales of $8.7
million, or 2.4 percent, in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 and
primarily reflected the impact of a stronger euro compared with the U.S.
dollar in the first quarter of 2010 versus the prior-year
period.
|
|
·
|
Unit
sales volumes increased by 2.8 percent in the six month period ended June
30, 2010 versus the prior-year
period.
|
|
o
|
Sales
volumes for the French segment increased by 1.9 percent, primarily as a
result of higher sales of base paper which more than offset the loss of
volumes as a result of the closure of the Malaucène
mill.
|
|
o
|
Sales
volumes in the United States increased by 3.6 percent, reflecting higher
sales of LIP-related products.
|
|
o
|
Brazil
experienced increased sales volumes of 6.8 percent as the result of higher
sales of certain tobacco-related
products.
|
French segment net sales of
$217.1 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 decreased by $6.4
million, or 2.9%, versus $223.5 million in the prior-year period. The
decrease in net sales was primarily the result of closing our facility in
Malaucène, France and an unfavorable mix resulting in lower average selling
prices. These negatives were partially offset by increased volumes and a
stronger euro relative to the U.S. dollar in the first quarter of 2010 as
compared to the first quarter of 2009.
The U.S. segment net sales of
$139.7 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 increased by $9.9
million, or 7.6 %, compared with $129.8 million in the prior-year
period. The increase in net sales of the U.S. segment resulted from
an improved mix of products sold and higher selling prices.
The Brazil segment net sales
of $40.7 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 increased by $3.6
million, or 9.7%, from $37.1 million in the prior-year period. The
change was primarily due to the favorable currency translation impacts on net
sales from a stronger Brazilian real.
Gross
Profit
(dollars
in millions)
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
Change
|
Percent
Change
|
Percent of Net Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$ | 375.9 | $ | 367.4 | $ | 8.5 | 2.3 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost
of products sold
|
277.8 | 281.2 | (3.4 | ) | (1.2 | ) | 73.9 | 76.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross
Profit
|
$ | 98.1 | $ | 86.2 | $ | 11.9 | 13.8 | % | 26.1 | % | 23.5 | % |
Gross
profit was $98.1 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010, an
increase of $11.9 million from $86.2 million in the prior-year
period. The gross profit margin was 26.1% of net sales in the six
month period ended June 30, 2010, an increase from 23.5% in the prior-year
period. Gross profit was favorably impacted by benefits of cost savings programs
and improved mill operations, as well as a favorable mix of products sold and
higher average selling prices.
Inflationary
cost increases, primarily related to higher per ton wood pulp prices, had an
unfavorable impact on operating expenses of $6.4 million during the six month
period ended June 30, 2010 compared with the prior-year period. The
average per ton list price of northern bleached softwood kraft pulp in the
United States was $935 per metric ton during the six month period ended June 30,
2010 compared with $660 per metric ton during the prior-year
period.
22
Nonmanufacturing
Expenses
(dollars
in millions)
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
Change
|
Percent
Change
|
Percent of Net Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling
expense
|
$ | 9.9 | $ | 10.7 | $ | (0.8 | ) | (7.5 | )% | 2.6 | % | 2.9 | % | |||||||||||
Research
expense
|
4.1 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
General
expense
|
22.6 | 23.1 | (0.5 | ) | (2.2 | ) | 6.0 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Nonmanufacturing
expenses
|
$ | 36.6 | $ | 37.8 | $ | (1.2 | ) | (3.2 | )% | 9.7 | % | 10.3 | % |
Nonmanufacturing
expenses decreased by $1.2 million, or 3.2%, to $36.6 million from $37.8 million
in the prior-year period, primarily due to lower incentive compensation
accruals. Nonmanufacturing expenses were 9.7% and 10.3% of net sales
in the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Restructuring
and Impairment Expense
Total
restructuring and impairment expense of $8.8 million was recognized during the
six month period ended June 30, 2010, primarily for French severance expenses at
PdM and Malaucène being recorded over the remaining service period of affected
employees. Total restructuring and impairment expense of $13.6 million was
recognized during the prior-year period which was comprised of $12.5 million for
severance-related and other cash costs and $1.1 million for other non-cash
charges.
Operating
Profit
($ in
millions)
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
Return on Net
Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||
France
|
$ | 27.6 | $ | 14.2 | $ | 13.4 | 12.7 | % | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||
United
States
|
31.4 | 25.5 | 5.9 | 22.5 | 19.6 | |||||||||||||||
Brazil
|
1.4 | 5.4 | (4.0 | ) | 3.4 | 14.6 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
60.4 | 45.1 | 15.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Unallocated
expenses
|
(7.7 | ) | (10.3 | ) | 2.6 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 52.7 | $ | 34.8 | $ | 17.9 | 14.0 | % | 9.5 | % |
Operating
profit was $52.7 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 compared
with $34.8 million during the prior-year period. Operating results
were higher in France and the U.S. but lower in Brazil.
The French segment’s
operating profit was $27.6 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010,
an increase of $13.4 million from $14.2 million in the prior-year
period. The increase was primarily due to:
|
·
|
Lower
restructuring expense of $5.9
million
|
|
·
|
Improved
mill operations and benefits of cost savings
programs
|
|
·
|
Favorable
currency impacts of $1.0 million due to the stronger euro against the
dollar during the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of
2009
|
|
·
|
These
positive factors were partially offset by $3.0 million in higher
inflationary costs primarily from wood
pulp
|
The U.S. segment’s operating
profit was $31.4 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010, a $5.9
million increase from operating profit of $25.5 million in the prior-year
period. The increase was primarily due to:
|
·
|
Improved
mill operations and benefits of cost savings
programs
|
|
·
|
A
$3.0 million benefit from a favorable mix of products sold and higher
selling prices, primarily due to higher sales of paper for LIP
cigarettes
|
|
·
|
These
positive factors were partially offset by $2.6 million in higher
nonmanufacturing expense, and a $1.4 million impact of higher inflationary
costs.
|
Brazil’s operating profit was
$1.4 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2010, compared with a
$5.4 million during the prior-year period. The decreased operating
profit was primarily due to:
|
·
|
Higher
inflationary costs of $2.0 million.
|
|
·
|
Lower
sales volumes had an unfavorable $1.0 million
impact
|
23
|
·
|
Restructuring
expenses totaling $0.5 million during the first half of
2010
|
|
·
|
These
factors were partially offset by improved mill operations and benefits of
cost savings programs.
|
Non-Operating
Expenses
Interest
expense of $1.0 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 decreased
from $3.1 million in the prior-year period. Average debt levels were
lower during the six month period ended June 30, 2010 versus the prior-year
period, and our weighted average effective interest rate was
lower. The weighted average effective interest rates on our debt
facilities were approximately 1.6% and 2.5% for the six month periods ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Other
expense, net was $1.3 million and $0.4 million for the six month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily due to foreign currency
transaction impacts.
Income
Taxes
The
provision for income taxes in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 reflected
an effective tax rate of 36.3% compared with 27.2% in the prior-year
period. The difference in effective tax rates was primarily due to
higher absolute levels of taxable earnings which reduced the percentage benefit
on the effective tax rate of our foreign holding company tax structure and a
French law, effective January 1, 2010, which changed a business tax to an income
tax for U.S. GAAP accounting purposes. The benefit of the foreign holding
company structure was lower in the six months ended June 30, 2010 than the
prior-year period due to the significant change in the euro versus the U.S.
dollar
Income
(Loss) from Equity Affiliates
Income
from equity affiliates was $1.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010
compared with a loss of $2.4 million during the six months ended June 30,
2009. These results reflected the operations of our joint venture in
China. The joint venture’s sales volume and production yields increased during
the first half of 2010 compared to the prior-year period when it was still in
the early stages of its operations.
Net
Income and Income per Share
Net
income for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was $33.4 million, or $1.80
per diluted share, compared with $20.4 million, or $1.32 per share, during the
prior-year period. The increase in net income in 2010 was primarily
due to an increase in mix to higher-value products, higher average selling
prices and benefits of cost savings programs including strategic actions taken
over the last four years to restructure the business.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
A major
factor in our liquidity and capital resource planning is our generation of cash
flow from operations, which is sensitive to changes in the sales mix, volume and
pricing of our products, as well as changes in our production volumes, costs and
working capital. Our liquidity is supplemented by funds available under our
revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks that is used as either
operating conditions or strategic opportunities warrant.
Cash
Requirements
As of
June 30, 2010, we had net operating working capital of $61.6 million and cash
and cash equivalents of $91.9 million, compared with net operating working
capital of $78.1 million and cash and cash equivalents of $56.9 million as of
December 31, 2009. Changes in these amounts include the impacts of
changes in currency exchange rates which are not included in the changes in
operating working capital presented on the consolidated statements of cash
flow.
24
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
($ in millions)
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 33.4 | $ | 20.4 | ||||
Non-cash
items included in net income:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
19.9 | 21.9 | ||||||
Asset
impairments and restructuring-related accelerated
depreciation
|
0.4 | — | ||||||
Amortization
of deferred revenue
|
(3.9 | ) | (3.4 | ) | ||||
Deferred
income tax provision
|
11.2 | 5.4 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement benefits
|
1.2 | (3.4 | ) | |||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
3.5 | 3.5 | ||||||
(Income)
loss from equity affiliate
|
(1.3 | ) | 2.4 | |||||
Other
items
|
(1.6 | ) | 0.2 | |||||
Net
changes in operating working capital
|
11.9 | (24.1 | ) | |||||
Cash
Provided by Operations
|
$ | 74.7 | $ | 22.9 |
Net cash
provided by operations was $74.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010
compared with $22.9 million provided by operations in the prior-year
period. Our net cash provided by operations changed favorably by
$51.8 million in 2010 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to $11.9
million favorable changes in operating working capital in 2010 versus
unfavorable changes in operating working capital in 2009 and higher net
income.
Operating
Working Capital
($ in millions)
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
|||||||
Changes
in operating working capital
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$ | (11.6 | ) | $ | 0.2 | |||
Inventories
|
11.5 | (1.2 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(1.9 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
6.1 | (14.2 | ) | |||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(12.0 | ) | 7.6 | |||||
Accrued
income taxes
|
19.8 | (16.0 | ) | |||||
Net
changes in operating working capital
|
$ | 11.9 | $ | (24.1 | ) |
In the
six month period ended June 30, 2010, net changes in operating working capital
contributed favorably to cash flow by $11.9 million, primarily due to receipt of
a French income tax refund in the 2010 period and decreases in inventory. These
were partially offset by increases in accounts receivable due to higher sales
and payments of previously accrued restructuring costs. During the full year
2010, the Company expects to pay from $25 million to $30 million in
restructuring costs primarily for employee severances most of which have already
been accrued. We expect remaining accrued severances, if any, would be paid in
2011.
In the
prior-year period, net changes in operating working capital contributed
unfavorably to cash flow by $24.1 million, primarily due to lower accrued income
taxes as a result of estimated income tax payments in France which were refunded
in 2010 and to lower accounts payable in part as a result of a French law
limiting vendor payment terms to 60 days.
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
(dollars in millions)
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
|||||||
Capital
spending
|
$ | (25.8 | ) | $ | (4.6 | ) | ||
Capitalized
software costs
|
(6.1 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||
Other
|
2.0 | 0.3 | ||||||
Cash
Used for Investing
|
$ | (29.9 | ) | $ | (6.1 | ) |
Cash used
for investing activities was $29.9 million in the six month period ended June
30, 2009 versus $6.1 million during the prior-year quarter.
25
Capital
Spending and Capitalized Software Costs
Capital
spending was $25.8 million and $4.6 million in the six month periods ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in capital
spending was primarily due to establishing LIP production capabilities in the EU
and construction of a new reconstituted tobacco facility in the Philippines for
which capital spending of $7.9 million and $9.8 million, respectively, was
incurred in the six month period ended June 30, 2010. We expect to spend a total
of approximately $117 million on the new reconstituted tobacco facility in the
Philippines of which approximately $55 million to $65 million will be incurred
during the full year 2010. We expect to spend a total of approximately $25
million for equipment to make LIP cigarette papers in Europe, of which
approximately $11.9 million is under contract and will be paid during
2010.
Capitalized
software costs were $6.1 million and $1.8 million for the six month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During the full year 2010, the
Company expects to spend a total of approximately $9 million to implement new
enterprise resource planning software in Brazil and the United
States.
In the
six months ended June 30, 2009, no individual capital projects exceeded $1.0
million of capital spending.
We incur
spending necessary to meet legal requirements and otherwise relating to the
protection of the environment at our facilities in the United States, France,
the Philippines, Indonesia, Brazil and Canada. For these purposes, we
expect to incur capital expenditures of approximately $2 to $3 million in 2010
and less than $1 million in 2011, of which no material amount is the result of
environmental fines or settlements. The foregoing capital
expenditures are not expected to reduce our ability to invest in other
appropriate and necessary capital projects and are not expected to have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
Total
capital spending for 2010 is expected to be $90 million to $110 million,
including the above-mentioned $80 to $90 million for the planned RTL expansion
in the Philippines and EU LIP expansion.
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
($ in millions)
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
dividends paid to SWM stockholders
|
$ | (5.4 | ) | $ | (4.6 | ) | ||
Net
proceeds from (payments on) borrowings
|
(5.9 | ) | (17.2 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of treasury stock
|
(0.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from exercises of stock options
|
1.1 | 0.4 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits of stock-based awards
|
1.1 | (0.5 | ) | |||||
Cash
Used in Financing
|
$ | (9.9 | ) | $ | (22.7 | ) |
Financing
activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 included borrowings of
$49.7 million and net repayments of debt totaling $55.6 million for a net
repayment of $5.9 million. Cash dividends paid to SWM stockholders were $5.4
million.
Financing
activities during the prior-year period included borrowings of $12.2 million and
net repayments of debt totaling $29.4 million for a net repayment of $17.2
million. Cash dividends paid to SWM stockholders were $4.6 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Dividend
Payments
We have
declared and paid quarterly dividends of $0.15 per share since the second
quarter of 1996. On June 17, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized
a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share of common stock. The
dividend will be payable on September 29, 2010, to stockholders of record on
August 27, 2010. We expect to continue this level of
dividend. However, the decision to declare a dividend is made quarter
by quarter and is based upon a number of factors including, but not limited to,
earnings, funding of strategic opportunities and our financial
condition. A decision could be made to cancel, suspend, modify or
change the form of future dividend payments.
Share
Repurchases
We
repurchased 11,791 shares of our common stock during the six month period ended
June 30, 2010 at a cost of $0.8 million. See Part II, Item 2, Unregistered Sales
of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
26
Debt
Instruments and Related Covenants
($ in millions)
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
|||||||
Changes
in short-term debt
|
$ | 1.7 | $ | (6.3 | ) | |||
Proceeds
from issuances of long-term debt
|
48.0 | 12.2 | ||||||
Payments
on long-term debt
|
(55.6 | ) | (23.1 | ) | ||||
Net
(payments on) proceeds from borrowings
|
$ | (5.9 | ) | $ | (17.2 | ) |
Net
payments on long-term debt were $7.6 million and proceeds from short-term debt
were $1.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Availability
under the U.S. Revolver increased to $95.0 million as of June 30, 2010 from
$62.0 million as of December 31, 2009. Availability under the Euro
Revolver decreased to 55.0 million euros, or $67.3 million, as of June 30, 2010
from 72.0 million euros, or $103.8 million, as of December 31, 2009. We also had
availability under our bank overdraft facilities and lines of credit of $28.7
million as of June 30, 2010.
The
Credit Agreement contains covenants that are customary for facilities of this
type that, among other things, require the Company to maintain (a) a net debt to
equity ratio not to exceed 1.0 and (b) a net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio not
to exceed 3.0. As of June 30, 2010, the net debt to equity ratio was
(0.09), and the net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio was (0.29). We
could have borrowed the remaining contractual availability under the Credit
Agreement as of June 30, 2010 without having exceeded the 3.0 net debt to
adjusted EBITDA ratio. The Company was in compliance with all the
financial covenants of the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2010.
Our total
debt to capital ratios at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were 8.8% and 11.1
%, respectively.
Other Factors Affecting
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Postretirement
Benefits. The pension obligations are funded by our separate
pension trusts, which held $121.4 million in assets at December 31,
2009. The combined postretirement benefit obligation of our U.S. and
French pension plans was underfunded by $27.2 million as of December 31,
2009. We are not required to make contributions to these plans during
2010.
Other Commitments. The French
segment has minimum purchase agreements for wood pulp and other fibers of $27
million and $7 million during 2010, respectively. The U.S. segment
has an agreement to purchase $2 million in tobacco stems in 2010. Papeteries de
Mauduit, or PdM, has a minimum annual commitment for calcium carbonate
purchases, a raw material used in the manufacturing of some paper products,
which totals approximately $2 million per year through 2014. Our
future purchases at PdM are expected to be at levels that exceed such minimum
levels under the contract.
LTRI and
PdM are committed to purchasing minimum annual amounts of steam provided by
cogeneration facilities for the next 11 to 13 years. These minimum
annual commitments together total approximately $4 to $5
million. LTRI’s and PdM’s current and expected requirements for steam
are at levels that exceed the minimum levels under the respective
contracts.
Brazil,
or SWM-B, and PdM have separately entered into agreements for the transmission
and distribution of energy. The SWM-B contract for the electrical
energy supply is effective through December 31, 2010 covering 100 percent of the
mill’s consumption of electrical energy. The value of the electric
energy to be provided under this contract is estimated at approximately $4
million. The PdM natural gas agreement provides for the supply of 100
percent of its requirements for natural gas and associated distribution to
service its paper mill. The value of the natural gas and distribution
to be provided under this contract is estimated at approximately $11.5 million
in 2010.
Employee Labor
Agreements. Hourly employees at the Spotswood, New Jersey and
Ancram, New York mills are represented by locals of the United Steel Workers
Union. The Spotswood mill is operating through September 1, 2010
pursuant to an extension of its collective bargaining agreement that expired
July 28, 2010 while negotiations continue. The collective bargaining agreement
at our Ancram, New York mill is a 3-year agreement effective through September
30, 2011.
27
Hourly
employees at our Saint-Girons, Quimperlé, and Spay, France mills are union
represented. The collective bargaining agreements at Quimperlé, Spay
and St. Girons mills are effective through December 31, 2010, February 28, 2011
and June 1, 2011, respectively. The collective bargaining agreement
at our Medan, Indonesia mill expires June 30, 2011.
Outlook
We remain
confident in and focused upon successfully executing our strategy to grow the
high-value RTL and LIP franchises while sustaining the profitability of our base
paper business. We made progress throughout the second quarter in
advancing the initiatives underway to expand capacity to meet expected new
demand for these products in Asia and Europe. Further, several
important business fundamentals improved during the second quarter, including
strong operating cash flow generation, total SWM sales volume growth, CTM
profitability, cost reductions from operational performance improvement
initiatives and non-manufacturing expense reductions. For the balance of 2010,
our overall financial results are difficult to project due to the uncertainties
associated with pulp prices and the volatility of the U.S. dollar to euro
relationship. Additionally, we continue to have a full agenda of major
initiatives to execute, including both expansion projects and completion of
restructuring actions.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to the safe harbor
created by that Act. These statements include those in the “Outlook”
section and our expectations elsewhere in Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, and in “Risk Factors” in Item
1A. They also include statements containing “expect,” “anticipate,”
“project,” “appears,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “typically” and similar
words. Actual results may differ materially from the results
suggested by these statements for a number of reasons, including the
following:
|
·
|
Schweitzer-Mauduit
has manufacturing facilities in 7 countries, a joint venture in China, and
sells products in over 90 countries. As a result, it is subject
to a variety of import and export, tax, foreign currency, labor and other
regulations within these countries. Changes in these regulations, or
adverse interpretations or applications, as well as changes in currency
exchange rates, could adversely impact the Company’s business in a variety
of ways, including increasing expenses, decreasing sales, limiting its
ability to repatriate funds and generally limiting its ability to conduct
business. In Brazil, we are currently generating more
value-added tax credits than we utilize. As of June, 30, 2010,
these credits totaled $11.8 million. We have applied for a
special government action in the state of Rio de Janeiro to enable more
rapid utilization of these credits. We expect approval and, if
successful, this and other actions should allow our Brazilian operation to
utilize more credits than it generates on an annual basis. These credits
do not expire; however, if the special action is not obtained, we will
record an allowance for substantially all of the current
balance.
|
|
·
|
The
Company’s sales are concentrated to a limited number of
customers. In 2009, 56% of its sales were to its four largest
customers. The loss of one or more of these customers, or a
significant reduction in one or more of these customers' purchases, could
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of
operations.
|
|
·
|
The
Company’s financial performance is materially impacted by sales of both
reconstituted tobacco products and cigarette paper for lower ignition
propensity cigarettes. A significant change in sales or
production volumes, pricing or manufacturing costs of these products could
have a material impact on future financial results. In this regard, the
Company has been advised by Philip Morris – USA that it disputes the
manner in which the Company has calculated costs for banded cigarette
papers under a cost-plus based contract for this
product. Currently, the disputed amount is approximately $15.8
million. While the Company believes that it has properly
calculated the amount it invoiced, the ultimate resolution of this
dispute, if unfavorable to the Company, could have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s results of
operations.
|
|
·
|
As
a result of excess capacity in the tobacco-related papers industry and
increased operating costs, competitive levels of selling prices for
certain of the Company’s products are not sufficient to cover those costs
with a margin that the Company considers reasonable. Such
competitive pressures have resulted in downtime of certain paper machines
and, in some cases, accelerated depreciation or impairment charges for
certain equipment as well as employee severance expenses associated with
downsizing activities. The Company will continue to disclose
any such actions as they are announced to affected employees or otherwise
become certain and will continue to provide updates to any previously
disclosed expectations of expenses associated with such actions. We expect
run-off operations at our Malaucène facility to be completed during the
second half of 2010 and will be evaluating its presentation as a
discontinued operation at that
time.
|
28
|
·
|
In
recent years, governmental entities around the world, particularly in the
United States and western Europe, have taken or have proposed actions that
may have the effect of reducing consumption of tobacco
products. Reports with respect to the possible harmful physical
effects of cigarette smoking and use of tobacco products have been
publicized for many years and, together with actions to restrict or
prohibit advertising and promotion of cigarettes or other tobacco
products, to limit smoking in public places and to increase taxes on such
products, are intended to discourage the consumption of cigarettes and
other such products. Also in recent years, certain governmental
entities, particularly in North America, have enacted, considered or
proposed actions that would require cigarettes to meet specifications
aimed at reducing their likelihood of igniting fires when the cigarettes
are not actively being smoked. Furthermore, it is not possible to predict
what additional legislation or regulations relating to tobacco products
will be enacted, or to what extent, if any, such legislation or
regulations might affect our
business.
|
|
·
|
Our
portfolio of granted patents varies by country, which could have an impact
on any competitive advantage provided by patents in individual markets. We
rely on patent, trademark, and other intellectual property laws of the
United States and other countries to protect our intellectual property
rights. In order to maintain the benefits of our patents, we may be
required to enforce certain of our patents against infringement through
court actions. However, we may be unable to prevent third parties from
using our intellectual property or infringing on our patents without our
authorization, which may reduce any competitive advantage we have
developed. If we have to litigate to protect these rights, any proceedings
could be costly, time consuming, could divert management resources, and we
may not prevail. We cannot guarantee that any United States or foreign
patents, issued or pending, will continue to provide us with any
competitive advantage or will not be successfully challenged by third
parties. We do not believe that any of our products infringe the valid
intellectual property rights of third parties. However, we may be unaware
of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of our
products or services. In that event, we may be subject to significant
claims for damages. Effectively policing our intellectual property and
patents is time consuming and costly, and the steps taken by us may not
prevent infringement of our intellectual property, patents or other
proprietary rights in our products, technology and trademarks,
particularly in foreign countries where in many instances the local laws
or legal systems do not offer the same level of protection as in the
United States.
|
Oppositions
were filed in December 2009 with the European Patent Office (EPO) contesting the
grant by the EPO to the company of patent number EP-1482815. The company
believes that the EPO properly granted the patent and it intends to respond to
the opposition arguments by the September 18, 2010 deadline established by the
EPO. However, the final resolution of the oppositions could result in the
invalidation of the patent or a further limitation of the scope of the patent
claims which could affect the competitive value of the patent. The outcome of
this dispute would not prevent the Company from practicing its Alginex® LIP
solution.
Further,
the company filed an infringement action on February 8, 2010 in the United
States District Court for South Carolina, Charleston Division, against multiple
defendants alleging infringement of the company’s United States Patent Number
6,725,867 and a First Amended Complaint on June 1, 2010 which added claims of
alleged infringement under United States Patent Number 5,878,753 and further
specification of the products alleged to violate said
patents. Adversarial proceedings present uncertainties and risks,
which could include invalidation of the patent in dispute, a change in the scope
of the patent claims, or an adverse determination on the question of
infringement, among others. The outcome of this dispute would not prevent the
Company from practicing its Alginex® LIP solution.
For
additional factors and further discussion of these factors, please see our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our
market risk exposure at June 30, 2010 is consistent with, and not materially
different than, the types of market risk and amount of exposures presented under
the caption “Market Risk” in Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC.
29
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We
currently have in place systems relating to disclosure controls and procedures
with respect to the accurate and timely recording, processing, summarizing and
reporting of information required to be disclosed in our periodic Exchange Act
reports. We periodically review and evaluate these disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions about required disclosure. In
completing our review and evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of June 30, 2010, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these controls and procedures were
effective as of June 30, 2010. No changes in our internal control over financial
reporting were identified as having occurred in the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The
Company is involved in various legal proceedings and disputes (see Note 15,
Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009). Except as noted below,
there have been no material developments to these matters during
2010.
On March
31, 2010, the City of Pontiac General Employees’ Retirement System, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, sued Schweitzer-Mauduit
International, Inc., its Chief Executive Officer, Frédéric P. Villoutreix, and
its Chief Financial Officer, Peter J. Thompson, in the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Georgia for alleged violations of certain
sections and rules of the Securities Act of 1934. The plaintiffs’ identified a
putative class period covering August 5, 2009 to February 10,
2010. The primary allegations of the suit contend that the defendants
misrepresented the strength of the Company’s competitive position in the U.S.
and its ability to withstand European competition, particularly in the area of
lower ignition propensity papers. Further, the complaint alleges that the
defendants concealed threats to the Company’s relationship with Phillip Morris
USA, Inc. As a consequence of these alleged misrepresentations or
omissions, the plaintiffs contend that the Company’s stock price was
artificially inflated causing the plaintiffs to be damaged in an unspecified
amount. The Company believes that the allegations are without merit as to all
defendants and intends to vigorously defend the matter as to itself and its two
officers. The Company believes the litigation will not have a material adverse
impact on the Company’s financial condition.
Imposto sobre Circulação de
Mercadorias e Serviços, or ICMS
As
previously disclosed in our filing on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, in January 2010, the State of Rio de Janeiro attempted to execute a tax
foreclosure to collect Assessment 2001.001.064544.6. The Company
responded by filing two actions, one in the court of the State of Rio de Janeiro
to stay the tax foreclosure and a second action for a writ of prevention filed
with the Supreme Court of Brazil.
On May
27, 2010, the State of Rio de Janeiro imposed a freeze of SWM-B’s bank
accounts. In June 2010, the Supreme Court of Brazil granted the writ of
prevention and stayed the execution of the tax foreclosure by the State of Rio
de Janeiro. On July 1, 2010, based on the Supreme Court’s order granting
the writ of prevention, the local court in Pirahy removed the freeze imposed on
SWM-B’s bank accounts. Based on the foreign currency exchange rate at
June 30, 2010, the Assessment totaled approximately $30 million, of which
approximately $14 million is covered by indemnification. No liability has been
recorded in our consolidated financial statements for the Assessment based on
our evaluation that SWM-B is more likely than not to prevail in its challenge of
the Assessment under the facts and law as presently understood.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
There
were no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in our Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
30
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The
following table indicates the amount of shares of the Company’s common stock it
has repurchased during 2010 and the remaining amount of share repurchases
currently authorized by our Board of Directors as of June 30, 2010:
Period
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price
Paid per
Share
|
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Programs
|
Maximum amount of
shares that May Yet
Be Purchased under
the Programs
|
||||||||||||||||
(#
shares)
|
($ in millions)
|
($
in millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||
First
Quarter 2010
|
8,491 | $ | 70.35 | 8,491 | $ | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||
April
2010
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
May
2010
|
3,300 | $ | 48.34 | 3,300 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
June
2010
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Total Year-to-Date 2010
|
11,791 | $ | 64.19 | 11,791 | $ | 0.8 | $ | 29.2 | * |
*In June
2010, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of shares of our Common
Stock during the period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011 in an amount not to
exceed $30.0 million.
The
Company sometimes uses corporate 10b5-1 plans so that share repurchases can be
made at predetermined stock price levels, without restricting such repurchases
to specific windows of time. Future common stock repurchases will be
dependent upon various factors, including the stock price, strategic
opportunities and cash availability.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not
applicable.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
(a)
Exhibits:
10.12.3
|
Amended and Restated
Addendum to Second Amended and Restated Agreement between Philip
Morris Incorporated and Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. for Fine
Paper Supply,
effective as of July 1, 2000.
†
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.*
|
|
*
|
These
Section 906 certifications are not being incorporated by reference into
the Form 10-Q filing or otherwise deemed to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
|
|
†
|
Exhibit
has been redacted pursuant to a Confidentiality Request under Rule 24(b)-2
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
|
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Schweitzer-Mauduit
International, Inc.
|
||||
(Registrant)
|
||||
By:
|
/s/ PETER J.
THOMPSON
|
By:
|
/s/ MARK A.
SPEARS
|
|
Peter
J. Thompson
|
Mark
A. Spears
|
|||
Executive
Vice President, Finance
|
Corporate
Controller
|
|||
&
Strategic Planning
|
(principal
accounting officer)
|
|||
(duly
authorized officer and
|
||||
principal
financial officer)
|
||||
August 4, 2010 | August 4, 2010 |
32
GLOSSARY
OF TERMS
The
following are definitions of certain terms used in our Form 10-Q and 10-K
filings:
|
·
|
“Banded cigarette paper”
is a type of paper, used to produce lower ignition propensity cigarettes,
by applying bands to the paper during the papermaking
process.
|
|
·
|
“Binder” is used to hold
the tobacco leaves in a cylindrical shape during the production process of
cigars.
|
|
·
|
“Cigarette paper” wraps
the column of tobacco within a cigarette and has varying properties such
as basis weight, porosity, opacity, tensile strength, texture and burn
rate.
|
|
·
|
“Commercial and industrial
products” include lightweight printing and writing papers, coated
papers for packaging and labeling applications, business forms, battery
separator paper, drinking straw wrap and other specialized
papers.
|
|
·
|
“Flax” is a cellulose
fiber from a flax plant used as a raw material in the production of
certain cigarette papers.
|
|
·
|
“Lower ignition propensity
cigarette paper” includes banded and print banded cigarette paper,
both of which contain bands, which increase the likelihood that an
unattended cigarette will
self-extinguish.
|
|
·
|
“Net debt to adjusted EBITDA
ratio” is a financial measurement used in bank covenants where
“Net Debt” is
defined as the current portion of long term debt plus other short term
debt plus long term debt less cash and cash equivalents,
and
|
|
·
|
“Adjusted EBITDA” is
defined as net income excluding extraordinary or 1-time items, net income
attributable to noncontrolling interest, interest expense, income taxes
and depreciation and amortization less amortization of deferred
revenue.
|
|
·
|
“Net debt to capital
ratio” is current and long term debt less cash and cash
equivalents, divided by the sum of current debt, long term debt,
noncontrolling interest and total stockholders’
equity.
|
|
·
|
“Net debt to equity
ratio” is current and long term debt less cash and cash
equivalents, divided by noncontrolling interest and total stockholders’
equity.
|
|
·
|
“Net operating working
capital” is accounts receivable, inventory, current income tax
refunds receivable and prepaid expense, less accounts payable, accrued
liabilities and accrued income taxes
payable.
|
|
·
|
“Opacity” is a measure
of the extent to which light is allowed to pass through a given
material.
|
|
·
|
“Operating profit return on
assets” is operating profit divided by average total
assets.
|
|
·
|
“Plug wrap paper” wraps
the outer layer of a cigarette filter and is used to hold the filter
materials in a cylindrical form.
|
|
·
|
“Print banded cigarette
paper” is a type of paper, used to produce lower ignition
propensity cigarettes, with bands added to the paper during a printing
process, subsequent to the papermaking
process.
|
|
·
|
“Reconstituted tobacco”
is produced in 2 forms: leaf, or reconstituted tobacco leaf,
and wrapper and binder products. Reconstituted tobacco leaf is
blended with virgin tobacco as a design aid to achieve certain attributes
of finished cigarettes. Wrapper and binder are reconstituted
tobacco products used by manufacturers of
cigars.
|
|
·
|
“Restructuring and impairment
expense” represents expenses incurred in connection with activities
intended to significantly change the size or nature of the business
operations, including significantly reduced utilization of operating
equipment, exit of a product or market or a significant workforce
reduction and charges to reduce property, plant and equipment to its fair
value.
|
|
·
|
“Start-up costs” are
costs incurred prior to generation of income producing activities in the
case of a new plant, or costs incurred in excess of expected ongoing
normal costs in the case of a new or rebuilt machine. Start-up
costs can include excess variable costs such as raw materials, utilities
and labor and unabsorbed fixed
costs.
|
|
·
|
“Tipping paper” joins
the filter element to the tobacco-filled column of the cigarette and is
both printable and glueable at high
speeds.
|
|
·
|
“Wrapper” covers the
outside of cigars providing a uniform, finished
appearance.
|
SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for
the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
|
|||
Number
|
Description
|
||
10.12.3
|
—
|
Amended
and Restated Addendum to Second Amended and Restated Agreement between
Philip Morris Incorporated and Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. for
Fine Paper Supply, effective as of July 1, 2000.†
|
|
31.1
|
—
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
—
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
—
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.*
|
*
|
These Section 906 certifications are not being incorporated by reference into the Form 10-Q filing or otherwise deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
†
|
Exhibit has been redacted pursuant to a Confidentiality Request under Rule 24(b)-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |