MATRIX SERVICE CO - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

or

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File No. 1-15461

MATRIX SERVICE COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

5100 East Skelly Drive, Suite 700, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (918) 838-8822

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Inter Active Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ¨    No  x

As of November 2, 2010 there were 27,888,217 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, issued and 26,403,081 shares outstanding.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Matrix Service Company

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(In thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

-1-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

-2-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

-3-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

-4-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

-5-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income

(In thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

-6-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Matrix Service Company (“Matrix Service”, “we”, “our”, “us” or the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, the information furnished reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and other adjustments described herein that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.

The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2010, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended. The Company’s business is cyclical due to the scope and timing of projects released by its customer base. In addition, Matrix Service generates a significant portion of its revenues under a comparatively few major contracts, which often do not commence or terminate in the same period from one year to the next. Accordingly, results for any interim period may not necessarily be indicative of future operating results.

Note 2 – Uncompleted Contracts

Contract terms of the Company’s construction contracts generally provide for progress billings based on project milestones. The excess of costs incurred and estimated earnings over amounts billed on uncompleted contracts is reported as a current asset. The excess of amounts billed over costs incurred and estimated earnings recognized on uncompleted contracts is reported as a current liability. Gross and net amounts on uncompleted contracts are as follows:

Progress billings in accounts receivable at September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 included retentions to be collected within one year of $9.0 million and $13.2 million, respectively. Contract retentions collectible beyond one year totaled $1.3 million and $0.1 million at September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010.

-7-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 3 – Goodwill

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by segment are as follows:

Note 4 – Debt

The Company has a five-year, $75.0 million senior revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”) that expires on November 30, 2012. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s subsidiaries and is secured by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The Credit Facility is primarily used for the issuance of letters of credit and to fund working capital. The credit agreement was amended, effective September 24, 2010, to waive the Company’s non-compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant as of June 30, 2010, to add back the charges related to the California Pay Practice Class Action Lawsuits discussed in Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies, included in Part I, Item 1 of this report, to the calculation of Consolidated EBITDA and to modify the definition of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio.

The credit agreement includes a Senior Leverage Ratio covenant which provides that Consolidated Funded Indebtedness may not exceed 2.5 times Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the September 24, 2010 amendment, over the previous four quarters. For the four quarters ended September 30, 2010, Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement, was $26.7 million. Accordingly, at September 30, 2010, Consolidated Funded Indebtedness in excess of $66.8 million would have violated the Senior Leverage Ratio covenant.

Availability under the senior credit facility is as follows:

-8-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants that place certain restrictions on the Company, including limits on new debt, operating and capital lease obligations, asset sales and certain distributions, including dividends.

The credit agreement, as currently amended, also includes the following:

The credit agreement includes significant covenants that include the following:

The Company is in compliance with all affirmative, negative, and financial covenants under the credit agreement and is at the lowest margin tier for the LIBOR and Alternate Base Rate loans and the lowest tier for the Unused Revolving Credit Facility Fee.

Note 5 – Income Taxes

The Company complies with ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. Deferred income taxes are computed using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial and tax basis of assets and liabilities using presently enacted tax rates. Valuation allowances are established against deferred tax assets to the extent management believes that it is not probable that the assets will be recovered.

-9-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The Company provides for income taxes regardless of whether it has received a tax assessment. Taxes are provided when it is considered probable that additional taxes will be due in excess of amounts included in the tax return. The Company continually reviews exposure to additional income taxes due, and as further information is known or events occur, adjustments may be recorded.

Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies

Insurance Reserves

The Company maintains insurance coverage for various aspects of its operations. However, exposure to potential losses is retained through the use of deductibles, coverage limits and self-insured retentions.

Typically our contracts require us to indemnify our customers for injury, damage or loss arising from the performance of our services and provide for warranties for materials and workmanship. The Company may also be required to name the customer as an additional insured up to the limits of insurance available, or we may be required to purchase special insurance policies or surety bonds for specific customers or provide letters of credit in lieu of bonds to satisfy performance and financial guarantees on some projects. Matrix Service maintains a performance and payment bonding line sufficient to support the business. The Company generally requires its subcontractors to indemnify the Company and the Company’s customer and name the Company as an additional insured for activities arising out of the subcontractors’ work. We also require certain subcontractors to provide additional insurance policies, including surety bonds in favor of the Company, to secure the subcontractors’ work or as required by the subcontract.

There can be no assurance that our insurance and the additional insurance coverage provided by our subcontractors will fully protect us against a valid claim or loss under the contracts with our customers.

Material Legal Proceedings

California Pay Practice Class Action Lawsuits

On December 8, 2008 (“December 2008 Action”) a class action lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County alleging that the Company’s subsidiary, Matrix Service Inc. (“MSI”), and any subsidiary or affiliated company within the State of California had a consistent policy of failing to pay overtime wages in violation of California state wage and hour laws. Specifically, the lawsuit alleged that the Company was requiring employees to work more than 8 hours per day and failing to compensate at a rate of time and one-half, failing to pay double time for all hours worked in excess of twelve in one day, and not paying all wages due at termination. The class seeks all unpaid overtime compensation, waiting time penalties, injunctive and equitable relief and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. The class included approximately 1,500 current and former employees.

On September 1, 2009 (“September 2009 Action”) a second class action lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of California, Alameda County also alleging that MSI, and Matrix Service Company failed to comply with California state wage and hour laws. The September 2009 Action included similar allegations to the December 2008 Action but also alleged that the Company did not provide second meal periods for employees who worked more than 10 hours in a day, third rest periods for those who worked more than 10 hours in a day, complete and accurate itemized wage statements, compensation for all compensable travel time, and did not take bonus payments into account when calculating the regular rate, leading to incorrect overtime rates. The class is seeking all allowable compensation, penalties for rest and meal periods not provided, restitution and restoration of sums owed, statutory penalties, declaratory and injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees and costs. The plaintiffs then amended the September 2009 Action to assert damages under the Private Attorney General’s Act. The September 2009 Action increased the class to approximately 2,300 current and former employees.

-10-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The cases have been coordinated in Alameda County. At the plaintiff’s request, mediation was held on September 7, 2010. In mediation, the parties executed a Memorandum of Understanding awarding the plaintiffs $4.0 million (“September Settlement”). The award is in addition to amounts previously paid to the class members of $1.9 million. The September Settlement is subject to court approval and resolves all class member claims included in the December 2008 Action and the September 2009 Action. The award will be used to pay the class member claims, the enhancement award, the cost of administration, and the class members’ attorneys’ fees and costs. As a result of these actions and the related settlement, the Company recorded a cumulative charge of $6.1 million, of which $5.1 million was recorded in fiscal 2010 and $1.0 million was recorded in fiscal 2009. The fiscal 2010 charge includes an estimate of the cost that will be incurred by the Company for payroll taxes that will be paid in conjunction with the September Settlement.

EPA Penalty

On April 20, 2010 the Company received notification from the EPA alleging non-compliance with certain reporting requirements mandated by the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act. The EPA alleges that the Company failed to submit Toxic Release Inventory Reporting Forms in calendar years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2008 for chromium, manganese, and nickel. The alleged reporting violations relate to the Company’s fabrication facility in Catoosa, Oklahoma and resulted in a penalty assessment of $0.3 million. On September 2, 2010 the Company entered into a Consent Agreement and Final Order (“CAFO”) with the EPA. Under the terms of the CAFO the Company agreed to an administrative penalty of $150,000 which was paid in September 2010. The CAFO settled all EPA allegations and released the Company of all potential liability.

Unapproved Change Orders and Claims

As of September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts included revenues for unapproved change orders of $3.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively. There were no revenues related to claims included in costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts at September 30, 2010 or June 30, 2010. Generally, collection of amounts related to unapproved change orders and claims is expected within twelve months. However, customers generally will not pay these amounts until final resolution of related claims, and accordingly, collection of these amounts may extend beyond one year.

Acquired Claims Receivable

The Company continues to pursue collection of the remaining claim receivables included in the purchase of S.M. Electric Company, Inc. in February of 2009. The recorded value at September 30, 2010 of $3.4 million represents the Company’s best estimate of the amounts that will ultimately be collected. However, monetizing these receivables may require mediation, arbitration or litigation and the ultimate amounts realized may be significantly different than the recorded amounts resulting in a material adjustment to future earnings. All future collection costs will be expensed as incurred.

Other

The Company and its subsidiaries are named as defendants in various other legal actions and are vigorously defending each of them. It is the opinion of management that none of the known legal actions will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

-11-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 7 – Other Comprehensive Income

Other comprehensive income and accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of foreign currency translation adjustments.

Note 8 – Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated based on the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS includes the dilutive effect of employee and director stock options as well as the dilutive effect of nonvested deferred shares.

The computation of basic and diluted EPS is as follows:

-12-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The following securities are considered antidilutive and have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share:

Note 9 – Segment Information

The Company has two reportable segments, the Construction Services segment and the Repair and Maintenance Services segment.

The primary services of our Construction Services segment are aboveground storage tanks for the bulk storage/terminal industry, capital construction for the downstream petroleum industry, specialty construction, and electrical/instrumentation services for various industries. These services, including civil/structural, mechanical, piping, electrical and instrumentation, millwrighting, and fabrication, are provided for projects of varying complexities, schedule durations, and budgets. Our project experience includes renovations, retrofits, modifications and expansions to existing facilities as well as construction of new facilities.

The primary services of our Repair and Maintenance Services segment are aboveground storage tank repair and maintenance services including tank inspection, cleaning and ASME code repairs, planned major and routine maintenance for the downstream petroleum industry and electrical and instrumentation repair and maintenance.

Other consists of operating activity related to previously disposed of businesses and certain corporate assets.

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on operating income. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Intersegment sales and transfers are generally recorded at cost; therefore, no significant intercompany profit or loss is recognized. Segment assets consist primarily of accounts receivable, costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, property, plant and equipment and goodwill.

-13-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

-14-

Table of Contents

Matrix Service Company

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 10 – Internal Investigation

In connection with a routine project review, the Company determined that a subcontractor and an employee of the Company in one operating location in the United States may have been in collusion to obtain improper payments from the Company. Consequently, the Company, with the assistance of internal audit, forensic accounting specialists and outside counsel, conducted an investigation into this matter which has led to the conclusion that the Company was improperly invoiced for a total of approximately $1.7 million by the subcontractor, a majority of which was in turn paid by the subcontractor to five current and former employees of the Company over the last four fiscal years. A portion of the improper payments were recorded as costs on cost reimbursable projects. These costs, along with the Company’s mark-up, were subsequently billed to certain customers resulting in an overbilling of $1.3 million, which will be refunded, accordingly, the Company recorded a liability of $1.3 million in accounts payable at June 30, 2010. The Company believes that the loss to the Company and the first $100,000 of costs incurred to conduct the investigation are covered by the Company’s crime policy and recorded a receivable for the estimated probable loss recovery from insurance of $1.3 million in accounts receivable at June 30, 2010. The insurance claim is in process but no amounts have been collected as of September 30, 2010.

The Company recorded a charge, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses, of $0.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 for the cost of the investigation. Since the internal investigation is complete and all significant costs have been identified, the Company does not believe this matter will significantly affect earnings in future periods.

The Company intends to fully cooperate with law enforcement authorities with respect to this matter.

-15-

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies from those reported in our fiscal 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. For more information on our critical accounting policies, see Part II, Item 7 of our fiscal 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following section provides certain information with respect to our critical accounting estimates as of the close of our most recent quarterly period.

Unapproved Change Orders and Claims

As of September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts included revenues for unapproved change orders of $3.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively. There were no revenues related to claims included in costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts at September 30, 2010 or June 30, 2010.

Acquired Claims Receivable

The Company continues to pursue collection of the remaining claim receivables included in the purchase of S.M. Electric Company, Inc. in February of 2009. The recorded value at September 30, 2010 of $3.4 million represents the Company’s best estimate of the amounts that will ultimately be collected. However, monetizing these receivables may require mediation, arbitration or litigation and the ultimate amounts realized may be significantly different than the recorded amounts resulting in a material adjustment to future earnings. All future collection costs will be expensed as incurred.

Insurance Reserves

We maintain insurance coverage for various aspects of our operations. However, we retain exposure to potential losses through the use of deductibles, coverage limits and self-insured retentions. As of September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the Company recorded insurance reserves totaling $7.9 million, and $8.3 million, respectively. These amounts represent our best estimate of our ultimate obligations for asserted claims, insurance premium obligations and claims incurred but not yet reported. We establish reserves for claims using a combination of actuarially determined estimates and case-by-case evaluations of the underlying claim data and update our evaluations as further information becomes known. Judgments and assumptions, including the assumed losses for claims incurred but not reported, are inherent in our reserve accruals; as a result, changes in assumptions or claims experience could result in changes to these estimates in the future. If actual results of claim settlements are different than the amounts estimated, we may be exposed to gains and losses that could be significant.

Goodwill

The Company’s most recent annual goodwill impairment test, performed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, indicated that the fair value of the Construction Services segment exceeded its carrying value by 75% and the estimated fair value of the Repair and Maintenance Services segment exceeded its carrying value by 61%. Based on the excess of estimated fair value over carrying value and the absence of any indicators of impairment at September 30, 2010, the Company does not currently anticipate recording a goodwill impairment charge for either of its operating units.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

There are no recently issued accounting standards that we believe will have a material effect on our financial statements.

-16-

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The Company has two reportable segments, Construction Services and Repair and Maintenance Services. The majority of the work for both segments is performed in the United States with 5.6% of revenues generated in Canada during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

The primary services of our Construction Services segment are aboveground storage tanks for the bulk storage/terminal industry, capital construction for the downstream petroleum industry, specialty construction, and electrical/instrumentation services for various industries. These services, including civil/structural, mechanical, piping, electrical and instrumentation, millwrighting, and fabrication, are provided for projects of varying complexities, schedule durations, and budgets. Our project experience includes renovations, retrofits, modifications and expansions to existing facilities as well as construction of new facilities.

The primary services of our Repair and Maintenance Services segment are aboveground storage tank repair and maintenance services, planned major and routine maintenance for the downstream petroleum industry, specialty repair and maintenance services and electrical and instrumentation repair and maintenance.

Significant fluctuations in revenues, gross profits and operating results are discussed below on a consolidated basis and for each segment. Revenues fluctuate due to many factors, including the changing product mix and project schedules, which are dependent on the level and timing of customer releases of new business.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009

Consolidated

Consolidated revenues were $151.8 million in fiscal 2011, an increase of $14.1 million, or 10.2%, from consolidated revenues of $137.7 million in fiscal 2010. The improvement in consolidated revenues resulted from an increase of $19.8 million in Construction Services revenues offset by a decrease of $5.7 million in Repair and Maintenance Services revenues.

Consolidated gross profit decreased from $17.4 million in fiscal 2010 to $15.7 million in fiscal 2011. The decrease of $1.7 million was due to lower gross margins which decreased to 10.3% in fiscal 2011 compared to 12.7% a year earlier. The decrease in gross margins was due to lower direct margins partially offset by the favorable effect of reduced unrecovered construction overhead costs.

Consolidated SG&A expenses were $10.6 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $10.1 million in the prior fiscal year. The net increase was primarily related to costs of $0.5 million associated with an internal investigation discussed in Note 10 – Internal Investigation of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item I of this report. SG&A expense as a percentage of revenue decreased to 7.0% in fiscal 2011 compared to 7.3% in the prior fiscal year.

Net interest expense was $0.2 million in fiscal 2011 and $0.1 million in fiscal 2010. Net interest expense for both periods was primarily related to Unused Revolving Credit Facility fees, fees on letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility, amortization of Credit Facility deal and amendment fees partially offset by interest earned on invested cash.

Other income in fiscal 2010 was $0.1 million and related primarily to foreign currency transaction gains. There was no other income in fiscal 2011.

The effective tax rates for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 were 38.0% and 38.1%, respectively.

-17-

Table of Contents

Construction Services

Revenues for the Construction Services segment were $97.5 million in fiscal 2011, compared with $77.7 million in fiscal 2010. The increase of $19.8 million, or 25.5%, was primarily due to the growth in our Electrical and Instrumentation revenues, which increased to $29.9 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $13.5 million a year earlier, and Aboveground Storage Tank revenues, which increased to $40.8 million in fiscal 2011, versus $31.4 million in fiscal 2010. Partially offsetting these increases were lower Downstream Petroleum and Specialty revenues which decreased to $20.9 million and $5.9 million in fiscal 2011, compared to $24.4 million and $8.4 million a year earlier.

Gross profit increased to $11.3 million in fiscal 2011 from $11.1 million in fiscal 2010 due to higher revenues partially offset by lower gross margins which decreased from 14.3% in fiscal 2010 to 11.6% in fiscal 2011. The decline was due to lower direct margins partially offset by the favorable effect of lower unrecovered construction overhead costs.

Repair and Maintenance Services

Revenues for the Repair and Maintenance Services segment were $54.3 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $60.0 million in fiscal 2010. The decline was due to a lower volume of recurring repair and maintenance work which has resulted in lower Aboveground Storage Tank revenues, which decreased to $21.2 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $26.8 million a year earlier, and lower Downstream Petroleum revenues, which decreased to $22.4 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $27.7 million if fiscal 2010. These declines were partially offset by higher Electrical and Instrumentation revenues, which increased to $10.7 million in fiscal 2011, compared to $5.5 million a year earlier.

Gross profit decreased from $6.3 million in fiscal 2010 to $4.4 million in fiscal 2011 due to a reduction in revenues and lower gross margins. Gross margins were 8.0% in fiscal 2011 compared to 10.5% in fiscal 2010. The gross margin reduction was due to lower direct margins partially offset by the favorable effect of lower unrecovered construction overhead costs.

Backlog

We define backlog as the total dollar amount of revenues that we expect to recognize as a result of performing work that has been awarded to us through a signed contract that we consider firm. The following contract types are considered firm:

For long-term maintenance contracts we include only the amounts that we expect to recognize into revenue over the next 12 months. For all other arrangements, we calculate backlog as the estimated contract amount less the revenue recognized as of the reporting date.

The following table provides a summary of changes in our backlog for the three months ended September 30, 2010:

-18-

Table of Contents

At September 30, 2010 the Construction Services segment had a backlog of $225.0 million, as compared to a backlog of $197.7 million as of June 30, 2010. The increase of $27.3 million is due to increases in Aboveground Storage Tank of $39.5 million and Specialty of $2.3 million, partially offset by decreases in Electrical and Instrumentation of $7.5 million and Downstream Petroleum of $7.0 million. The backlog at September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 for the Repair and Maintenance Services segment was $170.3 million and $155.5 million, respectively. The increase of $14.8 million is due to increases in Electrical and Instrumentation of $9.8 million and Aboveground Storage Tank of $9.3 million, partially offset by the decline in Downstream Petroleum of $4.3 million.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

EBITDA is a supplemental, non-GAAP financial measure. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. We have presented EBITDA because it is used by the financial community as a method of measuring our performance and of evaluating the market value of companies considered to be in similar businesses. We believe that the line item on our Consolidated Statements of Income entitled "Net Income" is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to EBITDA. Since EBITDA is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, it should not be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, net earnings as an indicator of operating performance. EBITDA, as we calculate it, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. In addition, this measure is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. As EBITDA excludes certain financial information compared with net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, users of this financial information should consider the type of events and transactions that are excluded. Our non-GAAP performance measure, EBITDA, has certain material limitations as follows:

A reconciliation of EBITDA to net income follows: