MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-32559
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
MARYLAND | 20-0191742 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I. R. S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
1000 URBAN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 501 | ||
BIRMINGHAM, AL | 35242 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
REGISTRANTS TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (205) 969-3755
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 7, 2009, the registrant had 80,166,013 shares of common stock, par value $.001,
outstanding.
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements. |
June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | (Unaudited) | (Note 2) | ||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Real estate assets |
||||||||
Land, buildings and improvements, and intangible lease assets |
$ | 992,266 | $ | 996,965 | ||||
Mortgage loans |
185,000 | 185,000 | ||||||
Gross investment in real estate assets |
1,177,266 | 1,181,965 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(47,712 | ) | (40,334 | ) | ||||
Net investment in real estate assets |
1,129,554 | 1,141,631 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
7,922 | 11,748 | ||||||
Interest and rent receivable |
17,645 | 13,837 | ||||||
Straight-line rent receivable |
21,678 | 19,003 | ||||||
Other loans |
109,433 | 108,523 | ||||||
Assets of discontinued operations |
1,185 | 2,385 | ||||||
Other assets |
13,797 | 14,246 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 1,301,214 | $ | 1,311,373 | ||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Debt |
$ | 562,692 | $ | 630,557 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
26,085 | 24,718 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
13,258 | 16,110 | ||||||
Lease deposits and other obligations to tenants |
15,764 | 13,645 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
617,799 | 685,030 | ||||||
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. stockholders equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value. Authorized 10,000 shares; no shares outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value. Authorized 150,000 shares; issued and outstanding 78,614 shares at June 30, 2009, and 65,056
shares at December 31, 2008 |
78 | 65 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital |
756,974 | 686,238 | ||||||
Distributions in excess of net income |
(73,597 | ) | (59,941 | ) | ||||
Treasury shares, at cost |
(262 | ) | (262 | ) | ||||
Total Medical Properties Trust, Inc. stockholders equity |
683,193 | 626,100 | ||||||
Non-controlling interests |
222 | 243 | ||||||
Total equity |
683,415 | 626,343 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity |
$ | 1,301,214 | $ | 1,311,373 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Rent billed |
$ | 23,598 | $ | 21,346 | $ | 46,684 | $ | 36,317 | ||||||||
Straight-line rent |
748 | 2,280 | 2,612 | 3,940 | ||||||||||||
Interest and fee income |
7,168 | 7,545 | 14,591 | 14,254 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
31,514 | 31,171 | 63,887 | 54,511 | ||||||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
6,708 | 5,337 | 12,954 | 8,865 | ||||||||||||
Property-related |
1,191 | 151 | 2,110 | 207 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
5,800 | 4,621 | 11,477 | 8,979 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
13,699 | 10,109 | 26,541 | 18,051 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
17,815 | 21,062 | 37,346 | 36,460 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
54 | 15 | 54 | 117 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(9,431 | ) | (12,879 | ) | (18,894 | ) | (20,334 | ) | ||||||||
Net other expense |
(9,377 | ) | (12,864 | ) | (18,840 | ) | (20,217 | ) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
8,438 | 8,198 | 18,506 | 16,243 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
(580 | ) | 5,186 | 69 | 8,040 | |||||||||||
Net income |
7,858 | 13,384 | 18,575 | 24,283 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
non-controlling interests |
(12 | ) | (18 | ) | (19 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Net income attributable to MPT
common stockholders |
$ | 7,846 | $ | 13,366 | $ | 18,556 | $ | 24,264 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share basic |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations
attributable to MPT common stockholders |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations attributable to MPT common
stockholders |
(0.01 | ) | 0.08 | | 0.13 | |||||||||||
Net income attributable to MPT common
stockholders |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.39 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
basic |
78,615,795 | 64,995,854 | 77,524,107 | 58,993,905 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share diluted |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations
attributable to MPT common stockholders |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations attributable to MPT common
stockholders |
(0.01 | ) | 0.08 | | 0.13 | |||||||||||
Net income attributable to MPT common
stockholders |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.39 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
diluted |
78,615,795 | 65,009,497 | 77,524,107 | 59,005,497 | ||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.54 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 18,575 | $ | 24,283 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
13,151 | 9,621 | ||||||
Straight-line rent revenue |
(3,723 | ) | (5,379 | ) | ||||
Share-based compensation |
2,896 | 3,668 | ||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
| (9,328 | ) | |||||
Straight-line
rent write off/reserve |
1,111 | 9,549 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(1,401 | ) | 3,144 | |||||
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs and debt discount |
2,753 | 5,263 | ||||||
Other adjustments |
(4,196 | ) | 1,475 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
29,166 | 42,296 | ||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Real estate acquired |
(499 | ) | (345,180 | ) | ||||
Principal received on loans receivable |
3,025 | 8,927 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of real estate |
| 89,982 | ||||||
Investment in loans receivable |
(5,681 | ) | (67,181 | ) | ||||
Construction in progress and other |
(1,204 | ) | (74 | ) | ||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(4,359 | ) | (313,526 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Revolving
credit facilities, net |
(68,800 | ) | (23,986 | ) | ||||
Additions to debt |
| 110,094 | ||||||
Payments of debt |
(606 | ) | (330 | ) | ||||
Distributions paid |
(29,439 | ) | (29,082 | ) | ||||
Sale of common stock |
67,848 | 128,029 | ||||||
Other financing activities |
2,364 | (4,033 | ) | |||||
Net cash
used (provided) by financing activities |
(28,633 | ) | 180,692 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for period |
(3,826 | ) | (90,538 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
11,748 | 94,215 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 7,922 | $ | 3,677 | ||||
Interest paid |
$ | 17,095 | $ | 12,549 | ||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities: |
||||||||
Interest and other receivables transferred to loans receivable |
| 78 | ||||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities: |
||||||||
Distributions declared, unpaid |
16,050 | 17,938 | ||||||
Other non-cash financing activities |
5 | 25 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
1. Organization
Medical Properties Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was formed on August 27, 2003 under the
General Corporation Law of Maryland for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in,
owning, and leasing commercial real estate. Our operating partnership subsidiary, MPT Operating
Partnership, L.P. (the Operating Partnership), through which we conduct all of our operations,
was formed in September 2003. Through another wholly-owned subsidiary, Medical Properties Trust,
LLC, we are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Presently, we directly own
substantially all of the limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership.
We have operated as a real estate investment trust (REIT) since April 6, 2004, and accordingly,
elected REIT status upon the filing in September 2005 of the calendar year 2004 federal income tax
return. Accordingly, we will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that we continue
to qualify as a REIT and our distributions to our stockholders equal or exceed our taxable income.
Certain activities we undertake must be conducted by an entity which we elected to be treated as a
taxable REIT subsidiary (TRS). Our TRS is subject to both federal and state income taxes.
Our primary business strategy is to acquire and develop real estate and improvements, primarily for
long-term lease to providers of healthcare services such as operators of general acute care
hospitals, inpatient physical rehabilitation hospitals, long-term acute care hospitals, surgery
centers, centers for treatment of specific conditions such as cardiac, pulmonary, cancer, and
neurological hospitals, and other healthcare-oriented facilities. We manage our business as a
single business segment as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: The accompanying unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information, including
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include
all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. Except for the impact from
the adoption of new accounting pronouncements (see Notes 4 and 9), the condensed consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that
date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.
In June 2009, we implemented Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, Subsequent
Events, or SFAS 165. This standard establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The
adoption of SFAS 165 did not impact our financial position or results of operations. We evaluated
all events or transactions that occurred after June 30, 2009 up through August 7, 2009, the date we
issued these financial statements. During this period we did not have any material recognizable
subsequent events except as described in Note 11.
For further information about significant accounting policies, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
New Accounting Pronouncements: The following is a summary of recently issued accounting
pronouncements which have been issued but not yet adopted by us.
6
Table of Contents
In June 2009, the FASB issued the following new accounting standards:
| SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, or SFAS 166; | ||
| SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), or SFAS 167; and | ||
| SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162, or SFAS 168 |
SFAS 166 prescribes the information that a reporting entity must provide in its financial
reports about a transfer of financial assets, the effects of a transfer on its financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement in transferred
financial assets. Specifically, among other aspects, SFAS 166 amends Statement of Financial
Standard No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities, or SFAS 140, by removing the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from SFAS
140 and removes the exception from applying FIN 46(R) to variable interest entities that are
qualifying special-purpose entities. It also modifies the financial-components approach used in
SFAS 140. SFAS 166 is effective for a transfer of financial assets occurring on or after January 1,
2010. We have not determined the effect that the adoption of SFAS 166 will have on our financial
position or results of operations, but we presently expect that the effect will generally be limited
to future transactions.
SFAS 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(revised December 2003) an interpretation of ARB No. 51, or FIN 46(R), to require an enterprise
to determine whether its variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in
a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the enterprise
that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most
significantly impacts the entitys economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of
the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to
receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest
entity. SFAS 167 also amends FIN 46(R) to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is
the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective for all variable
interest entities and relationships with variable interest entities existing as of January 1, 2010.
We have not determined the effect, if any, that the adoption of SFAS 167 will have on our financial
position or results of operations.
SFAS 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, to establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative
accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have an impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to the condensed consolidated financial
statements to conform to the 2009 consolidated financial statement presentation. These
reclassifications had no impact on stockholders equity or net income. In accordance with SFAS No.
160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (i) all prior period
non-controlling interests on the condensed consolidated balance sheets have been reclassified as a
component of equity and (ii) all prior period non-controlling interests share of earnings on the
condensed consolidated statements of income have been reclassified to clearly identify net income
attributable to the non-controlling interest.
3. Real Estate and Lending Activities
Acquisitions
In the second and third quarters of 2008, we completed the acquisition of 20 properties from a
single seller for approximately $357.2 million. In May 2008, we acquired a long-term acute care
hospital at a cost of $10.8 million from an unrelated party and entered into an operating lease
with Vibra Healthcare (Vibra). We financed these acquisitions using proceeds from our March 2008
issuance of debt and equity (see Note 4 Debt and Note 5 Common Stock), from our existing
revolving credit facilities and from the sale of three rehabilitation facilities to Vibra in May
2008 with proceeds (including lease termination fees and loan prepayment) totaling $105.0 million
(see Note 8 Discontinued Operations).
In June 2008, we entered into a $60 million financing arrangement with affiliates of Prime
Healthcare Services, Inc. (Prime) related to three southern California hospital campuses operated
by Prime. In July 2008, we acquired one of the facilities from a Prime affiliate for approximately
$15.0 million and the other two facilities (including two medical office buildings) in the 2008
fourth quarter for $45 million.
7
Table of Contents
The results of operations for each of the properties acquired are included in our consolidated
results from the effective date of each acquisition. The following table sets forth certain
unaudited pro forma consolidated earnings data for the three and six month periods ending June 30,
2008, as if each acquisition and the sale of three rehabilitation facilities to Vibra were
consummated on the same terms at the beginning of 2008 ($ amounts in thousands except per share
amounts).
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||
2008 | 2008 | |||||||
Revenues |
$ | 34,669 | $ | 68,417 | ||||
Net income |
10,433 | 22,857 | ||||||
Earnings per share diluted |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.34 |
Leasing Operations
In April 2009, we terminated leases on two of our facilities in Louisiana (Covington and Denham
Springs) after the operator defaulted on the terms of the leases. As a result of the lease
terminations, we took a $1.1 million charge in order to fully
reserve or write off the related straight-line
rent receivables associated with the Covington and Denham Springs
facilities, respectively. In addition we accelerated the amortization
of the related lease intangibles resulting in $0.5 million of expense in the 2009 second quarter. In June
2009, we re-leased the Denham Springs facility to a new operator under terms similar to the
terminated lease. The operator of the Covington facility has entered bankruptcy proceedings,
during which it has made payments to us generally equivalent to the amounts payable under the terms
of the terminated lease.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, revenue from affiliates of Prime accounted for
39.7% and 28.0%, respectively, of total revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
revenue from affiliates of Prime accounted for 39.1% and 32.0%, respectively, of total revenue.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, revenue from
Vibra accounted for 14.2% and
16.4%, respectively, of total revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, revenue
from Vibra accounted for 14.1% and 17.0%, respectively, of total revenue.
4. Debt
The following is a summary of debt ($ amounts in thousands):
As of June 30, | As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest Rate | Balance | Interest Rate | |||||||||||||
Revolving credit facilities |
$ | 124,200 | Variable | $ | 193,000 | Variable | ||||||||||
Senior unsecured notes fixed
rate through July and October
2011 due July and October 2016 |
125,000 | 7.333% - 7.871 | % | 125,000 | 7.333% - 7.871 | % | ||||||||||
Exchangeable senior notes |
||||||||||||||||
Principal amount |
220,000 | 6.125% - 9.250 | % | 220,000 | 6.125% - 9.250 | % | ||||||||||
Unamortized discount |
(9,877 | ) | (11,418 | ) | ||||||||||||
210,123 | 208,582 | |||||||||||||||
Term loans |
103,369 | Various | 103,975 | Various | ||||||||||||
$ | 562,692 | $ | 630,557 | |||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2009, principal payments due for our debt (which exclude the effects of any
discounts recorded) are as follows:
2009 |
$ | 605 | ||
2010 |
114,273 | (1) | ||
2011 |
211,091 | |||
2012 |
39,600 | |||
2013 |
82,000 | |||
Thereafter |
125,000 | |||
Total |
$ | 572,569 | ||
8
Table of Contents
(1) | $83,000 of the revolving credit facilities due in 2010 may be extended until 2011 provided that we give written notice to the Administrative Agent at least 60 days prior to the termination date and as long as no default has occurred. If we elect to extend, we will be required to pay an aggregate extension fee equal to 0.25% of the existing revolving commitments. |
In January 2009, we completed a public offering of common stock (see Note 5 Common Stock)
resulting in net proceeds of $67.9 million, which were used to repay borrowings outstanding under
our revolving credit facilities.
In November 2006 and March 2008, our Operating Partnership issued and sold $138.0 million and $82.0
million, respectively, of Exchangeable Senior Notes. See Note 4 of our 2008 Annual Report on Form
10-K, as amended, for further information in regards to the terms of the exchangeable senior notes.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlements)
(FSP), which affects the accounting for our exchangeable senior notes. The FSP requires that the
initial debt proceeds from the sale of our exchangeable senior notes be allocated between a
liability component and an equity component. The resulting debt discount is amortized over the
period the debt is expected to be outstanding as additional interest expense. We adopted this FSP
on January 1, 2009 and have applied the FSP retroactively to all periods presented. The adoption of
the FSP resulted in an increase in unamortized debt discount of $7.7 million and additional paid in
capital of $11.0 million and a decrease in retained earnings of $3.3 million in our consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2008. We recorded additional non-cash interest expense in our
consolidated statements of income of approximately $0.5 million ($0.01 per share) in the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, associated with the amortization
of this discount at an annual effective interest rate of 8.3% and 11.3% for the 2006 and 2008
exchangeable senior notes, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recorded $1.1 million ($0.01 per share) and $0.8 million ($0.01 per share), respectively.
The unamortized discounts of $6.1 million and $3.7 million
at June 30, 2009 will continue to be amortized through November 2011 and April 2013 for the 2006
and 2008 exchangeable senior notes, respectively.
Our revolving credit agreement and term loans impose certain restrictions on us, including
restrictions on our ability to: incur debts; grant liens; provide guarantees in respect of
obligations of any other entity; make redemptions and repurchases of our capital stock; prepay,
redeem or repurchase debt; engage in mergers or consolidations; enter into affiliated transactions;
and change our business. In addition, these agreements limit the amount of dividends we can pay to
100% of funds from operations, as defined in the agreements, on a rolling four quarter basis.
These agreements also contain provisions for the mandatory prepayment of outstanding borrowings
under these facilities from the proceeds received from the sale of properties that serve as
collateral.
In addition to these restrictions, our revolving credit agreement and term loans contain customary
financial and operating covenants, including covenants relating to our total leverage ratio, fixed
charge coverage ratio, mortgage secured leverage ratio, recourse mortgage secured leverage ratio,
consolidated adjusted net worth, floating rate debt, facility leverage ratio, and borrowing base
interest coverage ratio. These agreements also contain customary events of default, including
among others, nonpayment of principal or interest, material inaccuracy of representations and
failure to comply with our covenants. If an event of default occurs and is continuing under these
facilities, the entire outstanding balance may become immediately due and payable. At June 30,
2009, we were in compliance with all such financial and operating covenants.
5. Common Stock
In January 2009, we completed a public offering of 12.0 million shares of our common stock at $5.40
per share. Including the underwriters purchase of approximately 1.3 million additional shares to
cover over allotments, net proceeds from this offering, after underwriting discount and commissions
and fees, were approximately $67.9 million.
On January 9, 2009, we filed Articles of Amendment to our charter with the Maryland State
Department of Assessments and Taxation increasing the number of authorized shares of common stock,
par value $0.001 per share available for issuance from 100,000,000 to 150,000,000.
In March 2008, we sold 12,650,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.75 per share. After
deducting underwriters commissions and offering expenses, we realized proceeds of $128.6 million.
9
Table of Contents
6. Stock Awards
Our stockholders have approved and we have adopted the Second Amended and Restated Medical
Properties Trust, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity Incentive Plan) which authorizes
the issuance of options to purchase common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units,
deferred stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units and other stock based awards,
including profits interest in our Operating Partnership. The Equity Incentive Plan is administered
by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. We have reserved 7,441,180 shares of
common stock for awards under the Equity Incentive Plan for which 3,692,623 shares remain
available for future stock awards as of June 30, 2009. We awarded 441,134 and 405,512 shares in the
first quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively, of restricted stock to management, independent
directors, and certain employees. The 2009 awards vest quarterly based on service, over three
years in equal amounts beginning April 2009. The 2008 awards to management vest based on service
over five years in equal annual amounts beginning February 2009, while the awards to directors vest
based on service over three years in equal amounts beginning February 2009.
7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We have various assets and liabilities that are considered financial instruments. We estimate
that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, and accounts payable and accrued expenses
approximate their fair values. We estimate the fair value of our loans, interest, and other
receivables by discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates at which similar
receivables would be made to others with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining
maturities. We determine the fair value of our exchangeable notes based on quotes from securities
dealers and market makers. We estimate the fair value of our senior notes, revolving credit
facilities, and term loans based on the present value of future payments, discounted at a rate
which we consider appropriate for such debt.
The following table summarizes fair value information for our financial instruments: (amounts
in thousands)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Book | Fair | Book | Fair | |||||||||||||
Asset (Liability) | Value | Value | Value | Value | ||||||||||||
Interest and Rent Receivables |
$ | 17,645 | $ | 16,369 | $ | 13,837 | $ | 12,475 | ||||||||
Loans |
294,433 | 283,736 | 293,523 | 282,459 | ||||||||||||
Debt |
(562,692 | ) | (465,052 | ) | (630,557 | ) | (482,175 | ) |
8. Discontinued Operations
In the second quarter of 2008, we sold the real estate assets of three inpatient rehabilitation
facilities to Vibra for proceeds of approximately $105.0 million, including $7.0 million
representing early lease termination fee income and $8.0 million in the form of a loan
pre-payment. We recognized a $9.3 million gain on the sales of the real estate; however, we
wrote-off approximately $9.5 million in related straight-line rent receivables.
In 2006, we terminated leases for a hospital and medical office building (MOB) complex with
Stealth L.P. (Stealth) and repossessed the real estate. In January 2007, we sold the hospital and
MOB complex recognizing a gain of approximately $4.1 million. During the period between termination
of the lease and sale of the real estate, we substantially funded through loans the working capital
requirements of the hospitals operator pending the operators collection of patient receivables
from Medicare and other sources. In July 2008, we received from Medicare the substantial remainder
of amounts we expected to collect and based thereon recorded a charge of $2.1 million (net of
approximately $1.2 million in tax benefits) to write-off the remaining uncollectible receivables
from the operator in June 2008. We are defendants in ongoing litigation related to the Stealth
transaction as described in Note 10 Contingencies, which has
resulted in a certain amount of legal expenses for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
We have classified current and prior year activity related to these transactions, along with the
related operating results of the facilities prior to these transactions taking place, as
discontinued operations.
10
Table of Contents
The following table presents the results of discontinued operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 ($ amounts in thousands except per share amounts):
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | (944 | ) | $ | | $ | 2,705 | |||||||
Gain on sale |
| 9,328 | | 9,328 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
(580 | ) | 5,186 | 69 | 8,040 | |||||||||||
Earnings per share diluted |
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.08 | $ | | $ | 0.13 |
9. Earnings Per Share
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF Issue No. 03-6-1, Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, (FSP EITF
03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions
are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings
allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method as described in SFAS No. 128,
Earnings per Share. Under the guidance in FSP EITF 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards
that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid)
are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share
pursuant to the two-class method. Certain of our unvested restricted and performance stock awards
contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends, and accordingly, these awards are deemed to be
participating securities under FSP EITF 03-6-1. We adopted FSP EITF 03-6-1 on January 1, 2009 which
resulted in an approximate $0.01 and $0.02 negative impact on
earnings per share for the three and six month periods, respectively,
ending June 30, 2009 and 2008. Our earnings per share under FSP EITF 03-6-1 were
calculated based on the following (amounts in thousands except per share amounts):
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 8,438 | $ | 8,198 | ||||
Non-controlling interests share in continuing operations |
(9 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
Participating securities share in earnings |
(380 | ) | (471 | ) | ||||
Income from
continuing operations, less participating securities' share in
earnings |
8,049 | 7,710 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
(580 | ) | 5,186 | |||||
Non-controlling interests share in discontinued operations |
(3 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations attributable to MPT common stockholders |
(583 | ) | 5,185 | |||||
Net income,
less participating securities' share in earnings |
$ | 7,466 | $ | 12,895 | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Basic weighted-average common shares |
78,616 | 64,996 | ||||||
Dilutive stock options |
| 13 | ||||||
Diluted weighted-average common shares |
78,616 | 65,009 | ||||||
For the Six Months | ||||||||
Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 18,506 | $ | 16,243 | ||||
Non-controlling interests share in continuing operations |
(18 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
Participating securities share in earnings |
(770 | ) | (960 | ) | ||||
Income from
continuing operations, less participating securities' share in
earnings |
17,718 | 15,266 |
11
Table of Contents
For the Six Months | ||||||||
Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
69 | 8,040 | ||||||
Non-controlling interests share in discontinued operations |
(1 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations attributable to MPT common stockholders |
68 | 8,038 | ||||||
Net income,
less participating securities' share in earnings |
$ | 17,786 | $ | 23,304 | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Basic weighted-average common shares |
77,524 | 58,994 | ||||||
Dilutive stock options |
| 11 | ||||||
Diluted weighted-average common shares |
77,524 | 59,005 | ||||||
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, 0.1 million of options were excluded
from the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were not determined to be dilutive. Shares
that may be issued in the future in accordance with our convertible bonds were excluded from the
diluted earnings per share calculation as they were not determined to be dilutive.
10. Contingencies
In October 2006, two of our subsidiaries terminated their respective leases with Stealth, the
operator of a hospital and MOB that we owned in Houston, Texas. Pursuant to our subsidiaries
rights under these leases, we took possession of the real estate and contracted with a third party
to operate the facilities for an interim period. In January 2007, we completed the sale of these
properties to Memorial Hermann Healthcare System (Memorial Hermann). Several limited partners of
Stealth filed suit against the general partner of Stealth, our subsidiaries, the interim operator
and several other parties in December 2006, in Harris County, Texas District Court, generally
alleging that the defendants breached duties, interfered with the plaintiffs partnership rights
and misappropriated assets of Stealth. Further amended petitions filed by the plaintiffs added
Memorial Hermann as a defendant and, while dropping some of the original claims, alleged new claims
that our conduct violated the antitrust laws and constituted tortious interference with Stealths
business contracts and relationships.
In May 2007, Stealth itself filed a cross claim against our subsidiaries and the interim operator,
later amended to include us, our operating partnership and Memorial Hermann, broadly alleging,
among other things, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breaches of contract and warranty,
fraudulent presentment of a letter of credit, and that we operated all our subsidiaries as a single
enterprise and/or conspired with our subsidiaries to commit the other tort claims asserted. Stealth
most recently consolidated all of its claims against us in a consolidated petition that added
claims of breach of fiduciary duty and seeking actual and punitive money damages. The trial court
recently dismissed the letter of credit claim, and Memorial Hermann has agreed to defend and
indemnify us against one of Stealths breach of contract claims.
The plaintiffs and Stealth jointly seek more than $120 million in actual damages and more than $350
million in punitive damages. The case is set for trial in September 2009. We believe that all of
the claims asserted by Stealth and its limited partners are without merit and we intend to continue
to vigorously defend them. We have not accrued any estimated settlement, judgment or future defense
costs related to this litigation as of June 30, 2009. Our litigation counsel presently estimates
that a jury trial and the appeals process may take two years and cost $2 million in additional
defense costs. However, there can be no assurances about the time, cost or outcome of the trial and
appeals process.
11. Subsequent Events
On July 23, 2009, we entered into a lease of our Bucks facility located in Bensalem, Pennsylvania.
The lease has a fixed term of five years with an option, at
lessees
discretion, to extend 15 additional
periods of one year each. No rent will be required for the first six months. Thereafter, rent will
be $2.0 million per year with annual escalations of 2%.
In
addition, we may receive up to $1.0 million annually pursuant to
a profits interest agreement that provides for our participation in
the profits, if any, as defined in the agreement. After the fixed term, the tenant has the
right to purchase the facility at a price based on a formula set forth in the lease agreement.
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and consolidated
results of operations should be read together with the condensed consolidated financial statements of Medical
Properties Trust, Inc. and notes thereto contained in this Form 10-Q and
12
Table of Contents
the financial statements
and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (as amended) for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Forward-Looking Statements.
This report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results or future performance,
achievements or transactions or events to be materially different from those expressed or implied
by such forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the risks described in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such factors
include, among others, the following:
| National and local economic, business, real estate and other market conditions; | |
| The competitive environment in which we operate; | |
| The execution of our business plan; | |
| Financing risks; | |
| Acquisition and development risks; | |
| Potential environmental, contingencies, and other liabilities; | |
| Other factors affecting real estate industry generally or the healthcare real estate industry in particular; | |
| Our ability to maintain our status as a REIT for federal and state income tax purposes; | |
| Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; | |
| Federal and state healthcare regulatory requirements; and | |
| The impact of the current credit crisis and global economic slowdown, which is having and may continue to have a negative effect on the following, among other things: |
| the financial condition of our tenants, our lenders, counterparties to our capped call transactions and institutions that hold our cash balances, which may expose us to increased risks of default by these parties; | ||
| our ability to obtain debt financing on attractive terms or at all, which may adversely impact our ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt and our future interest expense; and | ||
| the value of our real estate assets, which may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or obtain or maintain debt financing secured by our properties or on an unsecured basis. |
Overview
We were incorporated under Maryland law on August 27, 2003 primarily for the purpose of investing
in and owning net-leased healthcare facilities across the United States. We have operated as a real
estate investment trust (REIT) since April 6, 2004, and accordingly, elected REIT status upon the
filing in September 2005 of our calendar year 2004 federal income tax return. We acquire and
develop healthcare facilities and lease the facilities to healthcare operating companies under
long-term net leases. We also make mortgage loans to healthcare
operators collateralized by their real
estate assets. In addition, we selectively make loans to certain of our operators through our
taxable REIT subsidiary, the proceeds of which are used for acquisitions and working capital. In
November 2008 we acquired a profit interest in one of our tenants that gives us a limited right to
share in the tenants positive cash flow. We intend to attempt, under appropriate circumstances,
to acquire similar interests in the future.
At June 30, 2009, our portfolio consisted of 52 properties: 46 facilities (of the 49 facilities
that we own) are leased to 13 tenants, three are presently not under lease, and the remaining
assets are in the form of first mortgage loans to two operators. Our owned facilities consisted of
22 general acute care hospitals, 13 long-term acute care hospitals, 6 inpatient rehabilitation
hospitals, 2 medical office
13
Table of Contents
buildings, and 6 wellness centers. The non-owned facilities on which we
have made mortgage loans consist of general acute care facilities.
We have 27 employees as of August 1, 2009. We believe that any adjustments to the number of our
employees will have only
immaterial effects on our operations and general and administrative expenses. We believe that our
relations with our employees are good. None of our employees is a member of any union.
Key Factors that May Affect Our Operations
Our revenues are derived from rents we earn pursuant to the lease agreements with our tenants,
interest income from loans to our tenants and other facility owners, and our profits interests in
certain of our tenants. Our tenants operate in the healthcare industry, generally providing
medical, surgical and rehabilitative care to patients. The capacity of our tenants to pay our rents
and interest is dependent upon their ability to conduct their operations at profitable levels. We
believe that the business environment of the industry segments in which our tenants operate is
generally positive for efficient operators. However, our tenants operations are subject to
economic, regulatory and market conditions that may affect their profitability. Accordingly, we
monitor certain key factors, changes to which we believe may provide early indications of
conditions that may affect the level of risk in our lease and loan portfolio.
Key factors that we consider in underwriting prospective tenants and borrowers and in monitoring
the performance of existing tenants and borrowers include the following:
| the historical and prospective operating margins (measured by a tenants earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and facility rent) of each tenant or borrower and at each facility; | |
| the ratio of our tenants and borrowers operating earnings both to facility rent and to facility rent plus other fixed costs, including debt costs; | |
| trends in the source of our tenants or borrowers revenue, including the relative mix of Medicare, Medicaid/MediCal, managed care, commercial insurance, and private pay patients; and | |
| the effect of evolving healthcare regulations on our tenants and borrowers profitability. | |
Certain business factors, in addition to those described above that directly affect our tenants and borrowers, will likely materially influence our future results of operations. These factors include: | ||
| trends in the cost and availability of capital, including market interest rates, that our prospective tenants may use for their real estate assets instead of financing their real estate assets through lease structures; | |
| potential changes in healthcare regulations that may limit the opportunities for physicians to participate in the ownership of healthcare providers and healthcare real estate; | |
| reductions in reimbursements from Medicare, state healthcare programs, and commercial insurance providers that may reduce our tenants profitability and our lease rates; | |
| other changes to the overall healthcare economy that may result from proposed and future federal legislation concerning the provision of healthcare in the United States. | |
| competition from other financing sources; and | |
| the ability of our tenants and borrowers to access funds in the credit markets. |
Beginning in 2007, economies around the world, including the United States economy, began
experiencing recessionary conditions. When combined with the extraordinary decline in values of
U.S. mortgage-backed securities and other financial assets, these conditions have resulted in
unprecedented disruptions in the capital markets and widening of credit spreads, which may
adversely affect the performance of our tenants and impact their ability to meet their obligations
to us. Failure to meet these obligations could, in certain cases, lead to restructurings,
disruptions, or bankruptcies of our tenants, which may reduce the amount of revenue we report,
require us to increase our allowances for losses, result in impairment charges and valuation
allowances that decrease our net income and equity, and reduce our cash flows from operations.
The current recession and capital market disruptions could also affect the availability of our own
debt and equity financing and increase the cost of our financing. Widespread concern about the
stability of financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties has led many lenders
and institutional investors to reduce and, in some cases, cease to
provide funding to borrowers. If these market conditions continue, they may adversely impact our ability to pursue acquisition and
development opportunities and refinance existing borrowings.
14
Table of Contents
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, which include revenue recognition, investment
in real estate, purchase price allocation, loans, losses from rent receivables, accounting policies
for derivatives and hedging activities, variable interest entities, and stock-based compensation
refer to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended. During the six months ended June 30,
2009, there were no material changes to these policies other than the accounting change related to
our convertible debt as described in Note 4 to the Notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
During the
six months ended June 30, 2009, operating cash flows approximated $29.2 million, which,
along with borrowings from our revolving credit facility, were used to fund our dividends of $29.4
million and investing activities of $4.4 million. In January 2009, we completed a public offering
of 12.0 million shares of our common stock at $5.40 per share. Including the underwriters purchase
of approximately 1.3 million additional shares to cover over allotments, net proceeds from this
offering, after underwriting discount and commissions and fees, were approximately $67.9 million.
The net proceeds of this offering were generally used to repay borrowings outstanding under our
revolving credit facilities. At June 30, 2009 we had approximately $71.0 million of available
borrowing capacity under our credit facilities and cash of approximately $7.9 million.
For the first six months of 2008, we generated cash of approximately $342.6 million from various
sources including $128.0 million from an equity offering, $79.6 million from the issuance of
exchangeable notes, $105.0 million from the sale of the three facilities to Vibra, and $30.0
million from a new term loan. These proceeds along with cash already on hand and borrowings from
our revolving credit facilities were used to fund our $357.2 million acquisition of 20 healthcare
facilities and the $60.0 million financing arrangement with affiliates of Prime related to three
southern California hospital campuses (including two MOBs).
Short-term Liquidity Requirements: At August 5, 2009, our availability under our revolving
credit facilities plus cash on-hand approximated $61 million. We have only nominal principal
payments due and no significant maturities until November 2010. We believe that the current
liquidity available to us, along with our monthly cash receipts from rent and loan interest, will
be sufficient for operations, debt service, and distributions in compliance with REIT requirements
during the remainder of 2009 and 2010.
Long-term Liquidity Requirements: Our first significant maturity of debt is in November 2010
when our $30.0 million term loan ($29.7 million outstanding on August 5, 2009) and our $154.0
million revolving credit facility ($93 million outstanding on August 5, 2009) mature. However, of
the approximately $122.6 million coming due in 2010, the $93.0 million related to our revolving
credit facility, can be extended to November 2011 so long as no default has occurred and we provide
necessary notice of our intentions to extend the facility.
We will require external capital in 2011 and beyond to satisfy debt maturities, including $138
million in maturing exchangeable notes and $66 million in a maturing term loan in November 2011.
Conditions in the capital markets have recently been volatile; the availability and cost of
differing types of capital changes frequently and sometimes dramatically. Accordingly, there is no
assurance that our present plans to address our long-term liquidity needs will be successful.
However, we believe a combination of the following sources will provide sufficient capital to meet
our existing liquidity requirements during the next five years.
| cash flows from operations. | |
| proceeds from property sales. | |
| issuance of new debt. | |
| replacement or extension of existing credit arrangements. | |
| sale of equity and equity-linked securities. |
15
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Three months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to June 30, 2008
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $7.9 million compared to $13.4 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2008.
A comparison of revenues for the three month period ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, is as follows ($
amounts in thousands):
Year over | ||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | Year | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Total | 2008 | Total | Change | ||||||||||||||||
Base rents |
$ | 23,004 | 73.0 | % | $ | 21,315 | 68.4 | % | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||
Straight-line rents |
748 | 2.4 | % | 2,280 | 7.3 | % | -67.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage rents |
594 | 1.9 | % | 31 | 0.1 | % | 1816.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Fee income |
48 | 0.1 | % | 967 | 3.1 | % | -95.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest from loans |
7,120 | 22.6 | % | 6,578 | 21.1 | % | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 31,514 | 100.0 | % | $ | 31,171 | 100.0 | % | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||
Since
July 1, 2008, we have invested approximately $120.2 million in new income-earning healthcare
real estate assets. At June 30, 2009, we owned 49 rent producing properties (three of which
generated no revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2009) compared to 43 at June 30, 2008. The
revenue from properties acquired since July 1, 2008 accounted for the majority of the increase in
base rent, percentage rents and interest revenues. Straight-line rents are lower in the 2009
quarter due to the $1.1 million write-off/reserve associated with the lease terminations disclosed in Note
3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Real estate depreciation and amortization
during the second quarter of 2009 was $6.7 million
compared to $5.3 million during the second quarter of 2008, a 26.4% increase. All of this increase is
related to the addition of rent producing properties from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009 and the
$0.5 million accelerated amortization on two properties due to lease terminations as noted in Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements in
Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Property-related expenses in the second quarter of 2009 increased from $0.2 million to $1.2
million. Approximately $1.0 million of this increase related to maintenance, utility costs,
property taxes, and legal costs associated with our vacant River Oaks and Bucks facilities. These
expenses are typically paid by our tenants. No such expenses related to River Oaks and Bucks were
recorded in 2008.
General and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2009 increased compared to the same
period in 2008 by $1.2 million, or 26.1%, from $4.6 million to $5.8 million. We have experienced a slight
increase in salaries and wages and accrued bonuses due to an increase in the number of employees in 2009 and higher
office and travel expenses as a result of the expansion of our portfolio.
Interest expense for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 totaled $9.4 million and $12.9
million, respectively. The decrease in interest expense was
primarily the result of the $3.2 million non-cash
charge for the write-off of costs associated with the short-term bridge facility that was
terminated in June 2008.
16
Table of Contents
In addition to the items noted above, net income for the quarters was impacted by discontinued
operations. See Note 8 to our condensed consolidated financial
statements of in Item 1 to this Form 10-Q for further information.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to June 30, 2008
Net income
for the six months ended June 30, 2009, was $18.6 million compared to net income of $24.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008.
A comparison of revenues for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, is as follows:
Year over | ||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | Year | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Total | 2008 | Total | Change | ||||||||||||||||
Base rents |
$ | 45,854 | 71.8 | % | $ | 36,236 | 66.5 | % | 26.5 | % | ||||||||||
Straight-line rents |
2,612 | 4.1 | % | 3,940 | 7.2 | % | -33.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage rents |
830 | 1.3 | % | 81 | 0.1 | % | 924.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Fee income |
176 | 0.3 | % | 1,093 | 2.0 | % | -83.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest from loans |
14,415 | 22.5 | % | 13,161 | 24.2 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 63,887 | 100.0 | % | $ | 54,511 | 100.0 | % | 17.2 | % | ||||||||||
The increase in base rents and interest is primarily due to acquisitions and other new investments.
In the 2008 second quarter, and early third quarter, we completed the acquisition of 20 properties
for $357.2 million from a single seller. Since July 1,
2008, we have invested $120.2 million in new
income-earning healthcare real estate assets (including $34.2 million
in new loans).
Percentage rent is higher for the first six months of 2009 as a result of the acquisitions noted
above. Straight-line rent decreased in the first six months versus prior year primarily due to
the write-off/reserve of straight-line rent receivables associated with the termination of two leases as
described in Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Real estate depreciation and amortization during the first half of 2009 was $13.0 million,
compared to $8.9 million during the same period of 2008, a 46.1% increase. All of this increase is
related to an increase in the number of rent producing properties from 2008 to 2009 and the
recognition of $0.5 million in accelerated amortization related to the termination of two of our
leases as disclosed in Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Property-related expenses during the first half of 2009 increased from $0.2 million to $2.1
million. Approximately $1.5 million of this increase related to maintenance, utility costs, property taxes, and
legal costs associated with our vacant River Oaks and Bucks facilities. These expenses are
typically paid by our tenants. No such expenses related to River Oaks and Bucks were recorded in
2008.
General and administrative expenses in the first two quarters of 2009 and 2008 totaled $11.5
million and $9.0 million, respectively, an increase of 27.8%. The 2009 expenses include bonus
accruals (of approximately $2.0 million) for the maximum amount of performance-based incentive
compensation that may be incurred pursuant to the performance targets in our incentive compensation
plans, while the 2008 expenses included a favorable accrual adjustment related to bonuses earned
for 2007 resulting in an expense of only $0.4 million for the first six months of 2008. In
addition, we have experienced a slight increase in salaries and wages due to an increase in the
number of employees in 2009 and higher office and travel expenses as a result of the expansion of
our portfolio.
Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 totaled $18.9 million and $20.3
million, respectively. Interest expense was higher in the prior year due to the $3.2 million
non-cash charge for the write-off of costs associated with the short-term bridge facility that was
terminated in June 2008 partially offset by the result of higher debt balances during the first
half of 2009.
In addition to the items noted above, net income for the six month periods was impacted by
discontinued operations. See Note 8 to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 to this Form 10-Q for further information.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Investors and analysts following the real estate industry utilize funds from operations, or FFO, as
a supplemental performance measure. While we believe net income available to common stockholders,
as defined by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), is the most appropriate measure, our
management considers FFO an appropriate supplemental measure given its wide use by
17
Table of Contents
and relevance to investors and analysts. FFO, reflecting the assumption that real estate asset
values rise or fall with market conditions, principally adjusts for the effects of GAAP
depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, which assumes that the value of real estate
diminishes predictably over time.
As defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, FFO represents
net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) on sales of real
estate, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We compute FFO in accordance with the NAREIT
definition. FFO should not be viewed as a substitute measure of our operating performance since it
does not reflect either depreciation and amortization costs or the level of capital expenditures
and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, which are
significant economic costs that could materially impact our results of operations.
The following table presents a reconciliation of FFO to net income attributable to MPT common
stockholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 ($ amounts in thousands
except per share data):
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to MPT common stockholders |
$ | 7,846 | $ | 13,366 | $ | 18,556 | $ | 24,264 | ||||||||
Participating
securities share in earnings |
(380 | ) | (470 | ) | (770 | ) | (960 | ) | ||||||||
Net income,
less participating securities share in earnings |
$ | 7,466 | $ | 12,896 | $ | 17,786 | $ | 23,304 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
6,708 | 5,337 | 12,954 | 8,865 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| 190 | | 758 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
| (9,328 | ) | | (9,328 | ) | ||||||||||
Funds from operations FFO |
$ | 14,174 | $ | 9,095 | $ | 30,740 | $ | 23,599 | ||||||||
Per diluted share amounts:
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income,
less participating securities share in earnings |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.39 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
0.09 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.15 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| | | 0.01 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
| (0.14 | ) | | (0.15 | ) | ||||||||||
Funds from operations FFO |
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.40 | ||||||||
Distribution Policy
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT commencing with our taxable year that began on April 6, 2004
and ended on December 31, 2004. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and
operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT
taxable income, excluding net capital gain, to our stockholders. It is our current intention to
comply with these requirements and maintain such status going forward.
The table below is a summary of our distributions declared during the two year period ended June
30, 2009:
Declaration Date | Record Date | Date of Distribution | Distribution per Share | |||||
May 21, 2009 |
June 11, 2009 | July 14, 2009 | $ | 0.20 | ||||
February 24, 2009 |
March 19, 2009 | April 9, 2009 | $ | 0.20 | ||||
December 4, 2008 |
December 23, 2008 | January 22, 2009 | $ | 0.20 | ||||
August 21, 2008 |
September 18, 2008 | October 16, 2008 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
May 22, 2008 |
June 13, 2008 | July 11, 2008 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
February 28, 2008 |
March 13, 2008 | April 11, 2008 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
November 16, 2007 |
December 13, 2007 | January 11, 2008 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
August 16, 2007 |
September 14, 2007 | October 19, 2007 | $ | 0.27 |
We intend to pay to our stockholders, within the time periods prescribed by the Internal Revenue
Code (Code), all or substantially all of our annual taxable income, including taxable gains from
the sale of real estate and recognized gains on the sale of securities. It is
18
Table of Contents
our policy to make sufficient distributions of cash or common shares to stockholders in order for
us to maintain our status as a REIT under the Code and to avoid corporate income and excise taxes
on undistributed income. Our Credit Agreement, signed in November 2007, limits the amounts of
dividends we can pay to 100% of funds from operations, as defined in the Credit Agreement, on a
rolling four quarter basis.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange
rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive
instruments. In addition, the value of our facilities will be subject to fluctuations based on
changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the ability of our tenants to
generate profits, all of which may affect our ability to refinance our debt if necessary. The
changes in the value of our facilities would be affected also by changes in cap rates, which is
measured by the current base rent divided by the current market value of a facility.
Our primary exposure to market risks relates to fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices.
Refer to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for a discussion of our quantitative and
qualitative disclosures and analyses about market risk, which include, interest rate and share
price sensitivity. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, there were no material changes to our
analyses.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures. |
We have adopted and maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls
and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives,
and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we have
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter covered
by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to
material information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file with the SEC.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
There have been no material changes to legal proceedings as presented in our Annual Report on Form
10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the commission on May 11,
2009.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors as presented in our Annual Report on Form
10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the commission on May 11,
2009.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
(a) Not applicable.
(b) Not applicable.
19
Table of Contents
(c) Not applicable.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
Not applicable.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
Our annual meeting of stockholders was held on May 21, 2009.
Proxies for the annual meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.
There were no solicititations in opposition to managements nominees for the board of directors or
other proposals listed in our proxy statement. All nominees listed in the proxy statement were
elected and all proposals listed in the proxy statement were approved.
The election of eight directors for the ensuing year was voted upon at the annual meeting. The
number of votes cast for and withheld for each nominee for director is set forth below:
Nominee: | For: | Withheld: | ||||||
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. |
64,359,995 | 8,182,082 | ||||||
Virginia A. Clarke |
65,608,492 | 6,933,585 | ||||||
G. Steven Dawson |
65,657,096 | 6,884,981 | ||||||
R. Steven Hamner |
63,499,225 | 9,042,852 | ||||||
Robert E. Holmes, Ph.D. |
65,601,616 | 6,940,119 | ||||||
Sherry A. Kellett |
65,622,457 | 6,919,620 | ||||||
William G. McKenzie |
64,119,340 | 8,422,737 | ||||||
L. Glenn Orr, Jr. |
64,781,659 | 7,760,418 |
A proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 was voted upon at the Annual Meeting.
The number of votes that were cast for and against this proposal and the number of abstentions and
broker non-votes are set forth below:
Abstentions and | ||||
For: | Against: | Broker Non-Votes: | ||
68,242,160
|
4,118,853 | 109,584 |
Item 5. | Other Information. |
Not applicable.
Item 6. | Exhibits. |
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|||
32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
20
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
99.1 | Consolidated Financial Statements of Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. as of March 31, 2009. Since affiliates
of Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. lease more than 20% of our total assets under triple net leases, the
financial status of Prime may be considered relevant to investors. Primes most recently available financial
statements (unaudited, as of and for the period ended March 31, 2009) are attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We have not participated in the preparation of Primes financial statements
nor do we have the right to dictate the form of any financial statements provided to us by Prime. |
21
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ R. Steven Hamner | |||
R. Steven Hamner | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(On behalf of the Registrant and as the Registrants Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
||||
Date: August 7, 2009
22
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|||
32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
99.1 | Consolidated Financial Statements of Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. as of March 31, 2009 |
23