MEI Pharma, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2008 November (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For
the transition period from ________ to ________.
Commission
File Number: 000-50484
Marshall
Edwards, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
|
51-0407811
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
140
Wicks Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2113 Australia
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(011)
61 2 8877- 6196
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code:
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer
x
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting entity o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of
October 31, 2008 the number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock,
$0.00000002 par value, was 73,463,233.
1
MARSHALL
EDWARDS, INC.
INDEX
PART
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
Page
|
Item
1:
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007 and for the period from December 1, 2000 (inception)
through September 30, 2008
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007 and for the period from December 1, 2000 (inception)
through September 30, 2008
|
5
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
|
6
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7
|
|
Item
2:
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation
|
18
|
Item
3:
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
27
|
Item
4T:
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
28
|
PART
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1A:
|
Risk
Factors
|
29
|
Item
6:
|
Exhibits
|
30
|
SIGNATURES
|
31
|
|
2
PART
I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1:
Financial Statements
MARSHALL
EDWARDS, INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
September
30
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 26,941 | $ | 19,743 | ||||
Deferred
offering costs
|
- | 110 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
79 | 125 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
27,020 | 19,978 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 27,020 | $ | 19,978 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 713 | $ | 1,130 | ||||
Accrued
expenses
|
1,904 | 1,884 | ||||||
Amount
due to related company
|
241 | 429 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
2,858 | 3,443 | ||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 100,000 shares,
|
||||||||
none
outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $ 0.00000002 par value, 113,000,000 authorized
|
||||||||
shares;
shares issued and outstanding: 73,463,233 at
|
||||||||
September 30,
2008 and 68,854,938 at June 30, 2008
|
- | - | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
78,145 | 68,266 | ||||||
Deficit
accumulated during development stage
|
(53,983 | ) | (51,731 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
24,162 | 16,535 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 27,020 | $ | 19,978 |
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
MARSHALL
EDWARDS, INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Period
from December 1, 2000 (Inception) through
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
Interest and
other income
|
$ | 96 | $ | 218 | $ | 2,514 | ||||||
Total
revenues
|
96 | 218 | 2,514 | |||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Research and
development
|
(2,078 | ) | (2,906 | ) | (27,344 | ) | ||||||
License
fees
|
- | - | (18,000 | ) | ||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
(269 | ) | (677 | ) | (11,146 | ) | ||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
(2,347 | ) | (3,583 | ) | (56,490 | ) | ||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(2,251 | ) | (3,365 | ) | (53,976 | ) | ||||||
Income
tax expense
|
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
Net
loss arising during development stage
|
$ | (2,252 | ) | $ | (3,366 | ) | $ | (53,983 | ) | |||
Net
loss per common share:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | ||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
71,910,438 | 66,657,459 |
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
MARSHALL
EDWARDS, INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Period
from December 1, 2000 (Inception) through
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Operating
activities
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss arising during development stage
|
$ | (2,252 | ) | $ | (3,366 | ) | $ | (53,983 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
||||||||||||
(used
in) provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Share
based payments
|
65 | - | 1,707 | |||||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
46 | 3 | (79 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(417 | ) | 29 | 713 | ||||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
20 | 705 | 1,904 | |||||||||
Amounts
due to related company
|
(188 | ) | 197 | 241 | ||||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(2,726 | ) | (2,432 | ) | (49,497 | ) | ||||||
Financing
activities
|
||||||||||||
Net
proceeds from issuance of common stock *
|
9,924 | 15,201 | 76,438 | |||||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
9,924 | 15,201 | 76,438 | |||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash
|
||||||||||||
equivalents
|
7,198 | 12,769 | 26,941 | |||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
19,743 | 16,158 | - | |||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 26,941 | $ | 28,927 | $ | 26,941 |
*
Deferred offering costs of $110,000 from the year ended June 30, 2008 have been
offset against net proceeds from the issuance of common stock in the three
months to September 30, 2008.
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
MARSHALL
EDWARDS, INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In
thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
Common
Stock
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
Deficit
accumulated during development stage
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(shares)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at June 30, 2008
|
68,854,938 | $ | 68,266 | $ | (51,731 | ) | $ | 16,535 | ||||||||
Net
loss arising during development stage
|
- | - | (2,252 | ) | (2,252 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
Loss
|
(2,252 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Common
Stock issued July 31, 2008
|
4,608,295 | 9,814 | - | 9,814 | ||||||||||||
Warrants
issued as share-based payment (refer Note 6)
|
- | 65 | - | 65 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2008
|
73,463,233 | $ | 78,145 | $ | (53,983 | ) | $ | 24,162 |
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6
MARSHALL
EDWARDS, INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. The
Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Marshall
Edwards, Inc. (“MEI”) including its subsidiary Marshall Edwards Pty Ltd (“MEPL”)
(together the “Group or the “Company”) is a development stage company
incorporated in December 2000 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Novogen Limited
(“Novogen”). The Company commenced operations in May 2002 and its business
purpose is the development and commercialization of drugs for the treatment of
cancer. The Company has been engaged in the clinical and pre-clinical
development of the anti-cancer drugs phenoxodiol, triphendiol (formally NV-196)
and NV-143. Novogen’s subsidiary has granted to MEPL, worldwide non-transferable
licenses under its patent right and patent applications and its relevant
know-how to conduct clinical trials and commercialize and distribute all forms
of phenoxodiol, triphendiol and NV-143 for uses in the field of prevention,
treatment, and cure of cancer in humans, except topical applications. As at the
date of this Quarterly Report, Novogen owns approximately 71.3% of the
outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock.
The
Company’s main focus since commencing operations has been to undertake human
clinical testing of phenoxodiol. Operations were expanded to include the
additional licensed drug candidates triphendiol and NV-143. During fiscal year
2007, the Company commenced the OVATURE Phase III clinical trial for phenoxodiol
(known as “OVATURE”). The Company has reached agreement under the Special
Protocol Assessment process with the United States Food and Drug Administration
(the “FDA”) on the design of its OVATURE pivotal study protocol for phenoxodiol.
The trial is designed to test the ability of phenoxodiol to restore sensitivity
of late-stage ovarian cancers to carboplatin, a standard form of therapy for
ovarian cancer. During fiscal year 2008 and quarter one of fiscal year 2009, the
Company has continued to recruit patients into the OVATURE trial. Due to the
global financial crisis the Company has decided to preserve cash and progress
the development of triphendiol to an IND and put on hold the development of
NV-143, focusing its resources on OVATURE.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MEI and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, MEPL. Significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.
Estimates
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
7
Revenue
Recognition
Interest
The only
revenue earned to date is interest on cash balances, which is recognized on an
accruals basis.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash on
hand and in banks and short-term deposits is stated at its nominal value. The
Company considers all highly liquid investments, with a maturity of three months
or less when purchased, to be cash equivalents. Highly liquid investments with
stated maturities of greater than three months are classified as short-term
investments. The Company’s cash, held in the United States, is deposited in
financial institutions that are FDIC insured. These deposits are in excess of
the FDIC insurance limits. The Company also holds cash with Australian financial
institutions. Cash held in Australia has Government backing up to $A1 million
per account.
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes have been provided for using the liability method in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized and measured using enacted tax rates
in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to be recognized.
Valuation allowances are established against the recorded deferred income tax
assets to the extent that management believes that it is more likely than not
that a portion of the deferred income tax assets are not realizable. There is a
full valuation allowance against net operating losses.
The
Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 48,
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB No 109”
(“FIN 48”) effective July 1, 2007. The implementation of FIN 48 did not result
in any increase or decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits
related to tax positions taken in prior periods, therefore there was no
corresponding adjustment in accumulated deficit. The Company’s total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2008 was $64 million. This consists of
net operating losses carried forward for which recognition is more likely than
not.
The
Company’s major tax jurisdictions are the United States and Australia and its
tax years since inception remain subject to examination by the appropriate
governmental agencies in those jurisdictions due to its tax loss
position.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash
equivalents and accounts payable, approximate fair value.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The
financial statements of MEPL have been translated into U.S. dollars in
accordance with
8
FASB
Statement No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation.” Assets and liabilities are
translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date. Income statement amounts have been translated using the average
exchange rate for the periods. Realized gains and losses from foreign currency
transactions are reflected in the consolidated statements of
operations.
Translation
of MEPL’s financial statements into U.S. dollars does not have a material impact
on the Company’s financial position.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development expenses relate primarily to the cost of conducting human
clinical and pre-clinical trials of phenoxodiol, triphendiol and NV-143.
Research and development costs are charged to earnings in the period
incurred.
License
Fees
Costs
incurred related to the acquisition or licensing of products that have not yet
received regulatory approval to be marketed, or that are not commercially viable
and ready for use or have no alternative future use, are charged to earnings in
the period incurred.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company’s stock option plan provides for the grant of options to the Company’s
directors, employees, employees of the Company’s affiliates and certain of the
Company’s contractors and consultants. To date, no options have been issued
under the plan.
Other
stock-based payments have been accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123R
“Share-Based Payments”. The Company therefore recognizes the cost of goods
acquired or the expense for services received in a share-based payment
transaction when it obtains the goods or as services are received. The Company
recognizes a corresponding increase in equity or a liability depending on the
classification of the share-based instrument granted.
Basic
and Diluted Loss Per Share
Basic and
diluted earnings or loss per share is calculated in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” In computing basic earnings or loss per
share, the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants are excluded, whereas
for diluted earnings per share they are included unless the effect is
anti-dilutive.
Stockholders’
Equity
Ordinary
share capital is recognized at the fair value of the consideration received by
the Company. Any transaction costs arising on the issue of shares are recognized
directly in equity as a reduction in the share proceeds received.
9
Deferred
Offering Costs
Where
costs associated with a capital raising have been incurred at balance date and
it is probable that the capital raising will be successfully completed after
balance date, such costs are deferred and offset against the proceeds
subsequently received from the capital raising.
2. Loss
Per Share
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per
common share:
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands, except share and per share data)
|
||||
Numerator
|
||||
Net
loss arising during development stage
|
(2,252)
|
(3,366)
|
||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
-
|
-
|
||
Numerator
for diluted earnings per share
|
$ |
(2,252)
|
$ (3,366)
|
|
Denominator
|
||||
Denominator
for basic earnings per share:
|
||||
Weighted
average number of shares used in computing net loss per share, basic and
diluted
|
71,910,438
|
66,657,459
|
||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
-
|
-
|
||
Dilutive
potential common shares
|
71,910,438
|
66,657,459
|
||
Basic
and diluted earnings per share
|
$ |
(0.03)
|
$ (0.05)
|
During
the period presented, the Company had warrants outstanding that could
potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, but were excluded
from the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would have been
anti-dilutive. Since the Company has a loss for all periods presented, diluted
and basic earnings per share are the same. The outstanding warrants consist of
the following potential common shares:
As
at September 30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
(Number
of warrant shares)
|
||||||||
Warrants
exercisable prior to July 11, 2010 at an exercise price of
$4.35
|
2,815,258 | 2,815,258 | ||||||
Warrants
exercisable prior to August 6, 2012 at an exercise price of
$3.60
|
2,185,598 | 2,185,598 | ||||||
Warrants
exercisable prior to August 6, 2012 at an exercise price of
$3.00
|
248,364 | 248,364 | ||||||
Warrants
exercisable prior to July 30, 2013 at an exercise price of
$2.17
|
46,083 | - | ||||||
Common
shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants
|
5,295,303 | 5,249,220 |
During
August 2007, the Company issued 5,464,001 shares of common stock and warrants
exercisable for 2,433,962 shares of common stock in connection with a private
placement or PIPE capital raising. For further details see Note 6
“Equity”.
During
July 2008, the Company issued 4,608,295 shares of common stock and warrants
exercisable for 46,083 shares of common stock. For further details see Note 6
“Equity”.
10
3. Expenditure
Commitments
At
September 30, 2008, the Company had contractual obligations for the conduct of
clinical trials, pre-clinical research and development and manufacturing process
development of approximately $16,192,000. Of the expenditure commitments,
clinical trial amounts are based on the assumption that all patients enrolled in
clinical trials will complete the maximum number of allowed treatment cycles.
The amounts, assuming all treatment cycles are completed, are expected to be
incurred as follows:
(In
thousands)
|
Payment
due by period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
less
than 1 Year
|
1 -
3 Years
|
3 -
5 Years
|
More
than 5 Years
|
|||||||||||||||
Purchase
Obligations
|
$ | 16,192 | $ | 9,450 | $ | 5,640 | $ | 1,102 | $ | - | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 16,192 | $ | 9,450 | $ | 5,640 | $ | 1,102 | $ | - |
No
amounts have been included for future payments to Novogen which may arise in
connection with the Phenoxodiol License Agreement, the License Agreement for
Triphendiol and NV-143, the Services Agreement or the Manufacturing License and
Supply Agreement, as future payments under the terms of the agreements are
subject to termination provisions. The terms of the agreements, including future
payments, are detailed in Note 5 “Related Party Transactions.”
The
Company is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.
The
Company’s certificate of incorporation provides that it will indemnify Novogen
in connection with certain actions brought against Novogen by any of the
Company’s stockholders or any other person.
Pursuant
to the terms of a Guarantee and Indemnity Agreement, the Company has guaranteed
the payment and performance of the obligations of MEPL to Novogen and its
subsidiaries, Novogen Laboratories Pty Limited and Novogen Research Pty Limited,
under the Phenoxodiol License Agreement, the Manufacturing License and Supply
Agreement and the Services Agreement. Novogen has guaranteed the performance of
the obligations of Novogen Research Pty Limited under the Phenoxodiol License
Agreement and the obligations of Novogen Laboratories Pty Limited under the
Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement to MEPL. Each of the Company and
Novogen’s obligations in the Guarantee and Indemnity Agreement are absolute,
unconditional and irrevocable.
4.
|
Segment
Information
|
The
Company’s focus is to continue the OVATURE clinical trial program currently
underway for the development and commercialization of phenoxodiol. The business
contains two major operating segments based on geographic location.
11
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
USA
|
Australia
|
USA
|
Australia
|
|||||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
$ | (253 | ) | $ | (1,999 | ) | $ | (79 | ) | $ | (3,287 | ) | ||||
Segment
assets
|
20,854 | 6,166 | 22,746 | 6,285 |
5. Related
Party Transactions
License
Agreement for Phenoxodiol
In
September 2003, the Company entered into a license agreement pursuant to which
Novogen’s subsidiary, Novogen Research Pty Limited, granted to MEPL a worldwide
non-transferable license under its patents and patent applications and in its
know-how to conduct clinical trials and commercialize and distribute phenoxodiol
products (the “Phenoxodiol License Agreement”). The Phenoxodiol License
Agreement covers uses of phenoxodiol in the field of prevention, treatment or
cure of cancer in humans delivered in all forms except topical applications. The
license is exclusive until the expiration or lapsing of the last relevant
Novogen patents or patent applications in the world and thereafter is
non-exclusive. MEPL may terminate the Phenoxodiol License Agreement by giving
three months notice to Novogen. MEPL paid $5,000,000 to Novogen in February 2004
which was the first lump sum license fee payment due under the terms of the
Phenoxodiol License Agreement. Also, MEPL paid $2,000,000 to Novogen in January
2005 and $4,000,000 in January 2006 which were the annual milestone license fee
payments due under the Phenoxodiol License Agreement. The Company paid a second
lump sum license fee of $5,000,000 to Novogen in July 2006 following the raising
of funds in a private placement or PIPE. This license fee was due on the later
of November 1, 2003 or such later date when the cumulative total of all funds
received from debt or equity issuances and revenue received from
commercialization (income other than sales) and sales of phenoxodiol products
exceeded $50,000,000. Following the PIPE capital raising which closed on July
11, 2006, the funds received from equity issuances exceeded $50,000,000 which
triggered this license fee payment. Future amounts payable to Novogen under
terms of the Phenoxodiol License Agreement are as follows:
1. Until
the expiration of the exclusivity period of the license, MEPL must pay Novogen
2.5% of all net sales and 25% of commercialization income. After the exclusivity
period of the license, 1.5% of net sales must be paid to Novogen. The
preconditions to such payments have not yet occurred.
The
“Exclusivity Period” ends on the later of:
(a)
|
the
date of expiration or lapsing of the last patent right in the patents and
patent applications set out in the Phenoxodiol License Agreement with
Novogen; or
|
(b)
|
the
date of expiration or lapsing of the last licensed patent right which MEPL
would, but for the license granted in the Phenoxodiol License Agreement,
infringe in any country in the geographical territory covered by the
Phenoxodiol License Agreement by doing in that country any of the things
set out in the Phenoxodiol License
Agreement.
|
12
2. In
addition to the amounts above, beginning in 2006, an $8,000,000 annual milestone
license fee is payable under the amended terms of the Phenoxodiol License
Agreement for each calendar year ending December 31 during the exclusivity
period of the license. The annual milestone license fees have been deferred
under the License Amendment Deed for Phenoxodiol and the Further Amended and
Restated License Agreement which are discussed below.
License
Amendment Deed for Phenoxodiol
In June 2006, the Company entered into
an amendment deed to the Phenoxodiol License Agreement (the “License Amendment
Deed for Phenoxodiol”). Pursuant to the original term of the Phenoxodiol License
Agreement, the Company was required to pay an $8,000,000 license milestone fee
to Novogen Research Pty Limited in December 2006. The License Amendment Deed for
Phenoxodiol extends the date that the $8,000,000 license milestone fee is
payable until the earliest receipt by MEPL of the first:
(i)
|
approval
by the FDA of a New Drug Application (“NDA”) for
phenoxodiol;
|
(ii)
|
approval
or authorization of any kind to market phenoxodiol in the United States;
or
|
(iii)
|
approval
or authorization of any kind by a government agency in any other country
to market phenoxodiol.
|
Upon
receipt of any of the above (the “Approval Date”), the Company must pay to
Novogen, $8,000,000, together with interest on that amount from (and including)
December 31, 2006, calculated at the bank bill rate. This milestone replaces the
$8,000,000 December 31, 2006 milestone fee.
Further
Amended and Restated License Agreement
Following
agreement in March 2007, MEPL and Novogen Research Pty Limited entered into
another amendment deed to the Phenoxodiol License Agreement for the purpose of
further amending and restating the Phenoxodiol License Agreement (the “Further
Amended and Restated License Agreement”).
The
combined result of the License Amendment Deed for Phenoxodiol and the Further
Amended and Restated License Agreement will be that upon the Approval Date, MEPL
will be required to pay Novogen Research Pty Limited $8,000,000, together with
interest on such amount from (and including) December 31, 2006 to (but
excluding) the Approval Date. Thereafter, MEPL will be required to make license
milestone fee payments of $8,000,000 to Novogen Research Pty Limited on
December 31 of the year of the Approval Date and on December 31 of
each year thereafter during the exclusivity period under the Phenoxodiol License
Agreement.
No
license fees have been accrued in respect of phenoxodiol at September 30,
2008.
License
Agreement for Triphendiol and NV-143
In May
2006, the Company entered into a second license agreement with Novogen for two
oncology compounds, triphendiol and NV-143 (the “License Agreement for
Triphendiol and NV-143”). Triphendiol is being developed initially in oral form
for the treatment of pancreatic
13
and bile
duct cancer and is currently in Phase I human testing. NV-143 is targeted for
the treatment of melanoma, also in oral dose form, and is in the pre-clinical
testing stage. The License Agreement for Triphendiol and NV-143 is an agreement
under which Novogen’s subsidiary, Novogen Research Pty Limited, grants to MEPL a
worldwide non-transferable license under its patents and patent applications and
in its know-how to conduct clinical trials and commercialize and distribute
triphendiol and NV-143 products. The License Agreement for Triphendiol and
NV-143 covers uses of triphendiol and NV-143 in the field of prevention,
treatment or cure of cancer in humans delivered in all forms except topical
applications. The license is exclusive until the expiration or lapsing of the
last relevant Novogen patents or patent applications in the world and thereafter
is non-exclusive. MEPL may terminate the agreement by giving three months notice
to Novogen. The Company is required to make payments under the terms of the
License Agreement for Triphendiol and NV-143 with Novogen as
follows:
1. A
lump sum license fee of $1,000,000 is payable to Novogen on the commencement
date of the license in consideration of the license granted. This initial lump
sum license fee was paid to Novogen in May 2006.
2. In
further consideration of the license granted, MEPL must pay to Novogen the
following milestone license fees upon the occurrence of the corresponding
milestone as set forth below;
a) the
first license product containing triphendiol to reach a milestone as set forth
below; and
b) the
first licensed product containing NV-143 to reach a milestone as set forth
below.
The
milestone license fees are:
|
i)
|
$1,000,000
on the date an investigational new drug application (“IND”) for the
licensed product goes into effect or the equivalent approval of a
government agency is obtained in another country. If this event does not
occur before March 31, 2008 then this amount will be due on this date. The
amount of $1,000,000 was paid to Novogen on March 31, 2008 under the terms
of this agreement;
|
|
ii)
|
$2,000,000
on the date of enrollment of the first clinical trial subject in a Phase
II clinical trial of the licensed product. If this event does not occur
before June 30, 2009, then this amount will be due on this
date;
|
|
iii)
|
$3,000,000
on the date of enrollment of the first clinical trial subject in a Phase
III clinical trial of the licensed product. If this event does not occur
before December 31, 2011, then this amount will be due on this date;
and
|
|
iv)
|
$8,000,000
on the date of first receipt of a NDA for the licensed product from the
FDA or equivalent approval from a government agency in another country. If
this event does not occur before December 31, 2013, then this amount will
be due on this date.
|
3. MEPL
must pay Novogen royalties of 5.0% of all net sales and 25% of commercialization
income for the term of the license. The royalty rate is reduced by 50% if the
licensed patent rights in any country or territory expire, lapse, are revoked,
do not exist or are assigned to MEPL and the product is entirely manufactured
and supplied in such country.
4. Minimum
royalties of $3,000,000 per year are payable following the date of first receipt
of an NDA for a licensed product from the FDA (or equivalent approval from a
government agency in any other country) until the expiration of the
term.
14
No
license fees have been accrued in respect of triphendiol or NV-143 at September
30, 2008.
Amended
and Restated License Option Deed
On
September 24, 2003, MEPL and Novogen Research Pty Limited entered into an
Amended and Restated License Option Deed (the “License Option Deed”). The
License Option deed grants MEPL an exclusive right to accept and an exclusive
right to match any proposed dealing by Novogen of its intellectual property
rights with a third party relating to synthetic compounds (other than
phenoxodiol) that have known or potential applications in the field of
prevention, treatment or cure of cancer in humans in all forms other than
topical applications.
Amended
and Restated Services Agreement
On
September 24, 2003, the Company, Novogen and MEPL entered into an Amended and
Restated Services Agreement (the “Services Agreement”). The Company does not
currently intend to directly employ any staff. Under the terms of the Services
Agreement, Novogen or its subsidiaries have agreed to provide services
reasonably required by the Company relating to the development and
commercialization of phenoxodiol and other licensed products, including
triphendiol and NV-143. Novogen has agreed to provide these services at cost
plus a 10% mark-up. The Company may terminate the agreement on three months
written notice to Novogen.
Transactions
giving rise to expenditures amounting to $683,000 and $594,000 were made under
the Services Agreement with Novogen during the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Of these amounts, $442,000 and $360,000 related to
service fees paid to Novogen for research and development services provided in
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, reflecting the
time spent by Novogen research staff on the development of phenoxodiol,
triphendiol and NV-143. Additionally, $241,000 and $234,000 of the total
expenditures during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, related to costs incurred for administration and accounting
services provided by Novogen.
At
September 30, 2008 and 2007, $241,000 and $454,000, respectively, were due and
owing to Novogen under the services agreement and are included in amounts due to
related company in the balance sheet.
Manufacturing
License and Supply Agreement
On
September 24, 2003, MEPL and Novogen Laboratories Pty Limited, a subsidiary of
Novogen, entered into an amended and restated manufacturing license and supply
agreement (the “Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement”). Under the terms of
the Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement, MEPL has granted to Novogen
Laboratories Pty Limited an exclusive, non-transferable sub license to
manufacture and supply phenoxodiol in its primary manufactured form. Novogen
Laboratories Pty Limited has agreed to supply phenoxodiol to MEPL for the
clinical trial development program and phenoxodiol’s ultimate commercial use.
Phenoxodiol supplied by Novogen under the terms of this agreement will be
charged at cost plus a 50% markup.
15
There
were no transactions under the Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement with
Novogen during the three months ended September 30, 2008. Transactions giving
rise to expenditures amounting to $12,000 were made under the Manufacturing
License and Supply Agreement with Novogen during the three months ended
September 30, 2007.
At
September 30, 2008 and 2007 there was no amounts owning to Novogen under the
Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement.
Novogen
has taken the strategic decision not to manufacture large scale Active
Pharmaceutical Ingredients (“API”) for cancer drugs, including phenoxodiol, as
these can be more economically supplied by third parties with particular
expertise in this area. The Company has entered into contracts with third
parties to ensure that sufficient quantities of phenoxodiol can be manufactured
in compliance with cGMP (Current Good Manufacturing Practices), to supply the
necessary quantities of API for the OVATURE trial and to complete the analytical
and stability work necessary for an NDA submission.
6.
Equity
On August
1, 2007, the Company entered into a securities subscription agreement with
certain accredited investors providing for the placement of 5,464,001 shares of
its common stock at a purchase price of $3.00 per share. The investors in the
transaction also received a warrant to purchase an additional 4 shares of common
stock for every block of 10 shares of common stock purchased. All of the
warrants have an exercise price of $3.60 per share. The warrants may be
exercised beginning February 6, 2008 and will expire five years from the date of
issuance, or August 6, 2012. The Company also issued 62,091 warrants to Blue
Trading, LLC, which acted as the placement agent in the private placement, as
part of the placement fee. The warrants issued to Blue Trading, LLC have an
exercise price of $3.00 per share and each warrant is convertible for 4 shares
of common stock. These warrants may be exercised immediately and will expire
five years from the date of issuance, on August 6, 2012. The Company closed the
private placement, or PIPE, on August 6, 2007. In connection with the PIPE, the
Company received proceeds of $15.2 million net of $1.2 million in commissions
and other costs.
The
Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the investors party to
the securities subscription agreement and Blue Trading, LLC, and agreed to file
a resale registration statement with the SEC registering the common stock and
the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants sold pursuant to the
securities subscription agreement for resale thereunder. The Company filed the
registration statement on October 2, 2007. The resale registration statement was
declared effective October 19, 2007.
Following
the closing of the PIPE in August 2007, Novogen retained approximately 71.9% of
the Company’s common stock.
The
Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-149807)
(The “Shelf Registration Statement”) with the SEC in March 2008. The Shelf
Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC on April 3, 2008. The
Shelf Registration Statement permits the Company to sell, from time to time, up
to $75,000,000 of common stock, preferred stock and warrants or any combination
of the foregoing. Pursuant to SEC
16
regulations,
however, the Company cannot sell securities from the Shelf Registration
Statement which represent more than one third of the Company’s public float
during any 12-month period.
The
Company entered into a Securities Subscription Agreement dated as of July 28,
2008 with Novogen and OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“Oppenheimer”) pursuant to which
the Company sold 2,908,295 and 1,700,000 shares of common stock to Novogen and
Oppenheimer, respectively, with Oppenheimer acting as adviser to each of the
following parties severally and not jointly: (i) Oppenheimer International
Growth Fund; (ii) Mass Mutual International Equity Fund; (iii) Oppenheimer
International Growth Fund/VA; (iv) AZL Oppenheimer International Growth Fund;
(v) OFITC International Growth Fund; and (vi) OFI International Equity Fund, at
a purchase price of $2.17 per share, the consolidated closing bid price of the
Company’s Common Stock as quoted by the Nasdaq Market Intelligence Desk at 4:00
PM EST on July 28, 2008. The shares were registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), under the Shelf
Registration Statement. The Company received gross proceeds of $10 million from
the sale of the shares.
Following
the closing of the registered direct offering described above in July 2008,
Novogen retained approximately 71.3% of the Company’s common stock.
In July
2008, the Company also issued a warrant to Mr. John O’Connor exercisable for
46,083 shares of common stock, as consideration for investor relations services
rendered by him to the Company. The warrant has an exercise price of $2.17 per
share. The warrant may be exercised immediately and expires five years from the
date of issuance, on July 30, 2013. The warrant has not been registered under
the Securities Act. The Company issued the warrant to Mr. O’Connor in a private
placement made in reliance upon the exemption from securities registration
afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
7.
Contingent Liabilities
Under the
terms of the license agreements with Novogen, milestone license fee payments are
payable upon achieving certain milestones. Details of the payments due under
these agreements are detailed in Note 5 “Related Party Transactions.” The
license agreements are subject to termination provisions.
17
Item 2:
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation
Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than
statements of historical facts contained in this quarterly report, including
statements regarding the future financial position, business strategy and plans
and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking
statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,”
“anticipate,” “intend,” “should,” “plan,” “expect,” and similar expressions, as
they relate to the Company, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
We have based these forward-looking statements largely on current expectations
and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may
affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and
financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of
risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, among other
things:
· our
inability to obtain additional required financing or financing available
to us on acceptable terms, particularly in the context
of the
current global
financial crisis;
|
· our
inability to maintain or enter into, and our dependence upon,
collaboration or contractual arrangements necessary for
the clinical
development
of phenoxodiol and other drug candidates;
|
· our
limited operating history;
|
· our
failure to successfully commercialize our product candidates;
|
· costs
and delays in the development and/or receipt of the approval of the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) or other
required
governmental approvals, or the failure to obtain such approvals, for our
product candidates;
|
· uncertainties
in clinical trial results;
|
· our
inability to maintain or enter into, and the risks resulting from our
dependence upon, collaboration or contractual
arrangements necessary
for the manufacture, commercialization, marketing, sales and distribution
of any products;
|
· our
inability to control the costs of manufacturing our products;
|
· continued
cooperation and support of Novogen Limited (“Novogen”), our parent
company;
|
· competition
and competitive factors;
|
· our
inability to protect our patents or proprietary rights and obtain
necessary rights to third party patents and intellectual property
to
operate our business;
|
· our
inability to operate our business without infringing the patents and
proprietary rights of others;
|
18
· costs
stemming from our defence against third party intellectual property
infringement claims;
|
· difficulties
in enforcement of civil liabilities against those of our officers and
directors who are residents of jurisdictions outside the
United States;
|
· general
economic conditions;
|
· the
failure of any products to gain market acceptance;
|
· technological
changes;
|
· government
regulation generally and the receipt of the regulatory
approvals;
|
· changes
in industry practice; and
|
· one-time
events.
|
These
risks are not exhaustive. Other sections of this quarterly report may include
additional factors which could adversely impact business and financial
performance. In addition, our business and financial performance may be affected
by the factors that are discussed under “Risk Factors” in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008. Moreover, we operate in a very
competitive and rapidly changing environment.
You
should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events.
We cannot assure you that the events and circumstances reflected in the
forward-looking statements will be achieved or will occur. Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance
or achievements.
The
following discussion is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in
conjunction with, the more detailed information set forth in the financial
statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report.
Overview
Our main
focus since commencing operations is to undertake human clinical testing of
phenoxodiol. Our operations were expanded to include the additional licensed
drug candidates triphendiol and NV-143. During fiscal year 2007, we commenced
the Phase III clinical trial (known as “OVATURE”). We have reached agreement
under the Special Protocol Assessment process with the FDA on the design of our
OVATURE pivotal study protocol for phenoxodiol. The trial is designed to test
the ability of phenoxodiol to restore sensitivity of late-stage ovarian cancers
to carboplatin, a standard form of therapy for ovarian cancer. During fiscal
year 2008 and quarter one of fiscal year 2009, the Company has continued to
recruit patients into the OVATURE trial.
As at the
date of the Quarterly Report, Novogen owns approximately 71.3% of the
outstanding shares of our common stock.
We
believe that the proceeds from the registered direct offering closed in July
2008 provides us with sufficient cash resources to fund operations over the next
twelve months which include progressing the Phase III OVATURE
trial.
19
Due to
the current financial crisis and the uncertainties surrounding our ability to
raise funds from the equity markets in the short to medium term, we are
progressing the development of triphendiol to an IND and we have put on hold the
development of NV-143. This will enable us to conserve cash and focus our
resources on conducting the OVATURE trial. We will however need additional funds
in order complete the OVATURE trial and to progress the clinical development
program for triphendiol and NV-143 beyond the current objectives.
As of
September 30, 2008, we had accumulated losses of $53,983,000.
We have
not generated any revenues from operations since inception other than interest
on cash assets.
We do not
employ any staff directly but obtain services from Novogen under the Services
Agreement. We have incurred losses since inception and expect to incur operating
losses and generate negative cash flows from operations for the foreseeable
future.
Expenses
to date have consisted primarily of costs associated with conducting the
clinical trials of phenoxodiol including OVATURE, costs incurred under the
Phenoxodiol License Agreement, the License Agreement for Triphendiol and NV-143,
the Services Agreement and the Manufacturing License and Supply Agreements with
Novogen and its subsidiaries, including the costs of the clinical trial drug
supplies.
To date,
operations have been funded primarily through the sale of equity
securities.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Development
Expenses
Research
and development costs incurred since inception through September 30, 2008
aggregate to $27,344,000.
Research
and development costs include clinical trial expenses and are expensed as they
are incurred. Costs are expected to increase in the future as the number of
treated patients in the OVATURE trial increases resulting in significantly
increased costs.
Historical
research and development costs and clinical trial costs have not been documented
on a project by project basis. In addition, research and development resources
are supplied by Novogen across several projects. As a result, the costs incurred
for each clinical project cannot be stated precisely on a project by project
basis.
We expect
that a large percentage of research and development expenses in the future will
be incurred in support of current and future clinical development programs.
These expenditures are subject to a number of uncertainties in timing and cost
to completion.
20
The
duration and cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a
project as a result of:
· the
number of sites included in the trials;
|
· the
length of time required to enroll suitable patients;
|
· the
number of patients that participate in the trials;
|
· the
number of treatment cycles patients complete while they are enrolled in
the trials;
|
· the
indication being studied;
|
· the
availability of alternative treatment; and
|
· the
efficacy and safety profile of the
product.
|
Our
strategy also includes the option of entering into collaborative arrangements
with third parties to participate in the development and commercialization of
our drug candidates. In the event third parties have control over the clinical
development process, the completion date would largely be under the control of
that third party.
As a
result of these uncertainties, we are unable to determine the duration of, or
completion costs for, research and development projects or when, and to what
extent, we will receive cash inflows from the commercialization and sale of the
drug candidates.
Clinical
Trial Expenses
Estimates
have been used in determining the expense liability under certain clinical trial
contracts where services have been performed but not yet invoiced. The actual
costs of those services could differ in amount and timing from the estimates
used in completing the financial results.
Clinical
trial expenses of $1,558,000 have been accrued at September 30, 2008. These
estimates are based on the number of patients in each trial and the number of
drug administration cycles completed.
Clinical
research contracts may vary depending on the clinical trial design and protocol.
Generally the costs, and therefore estimates, associated with clinical trial
contracts are based on the number of patients, drug administration cycles, the
type of treatment and the outcome being measured. The length of time before
actual amounts can be determined will vary depending on length of the patient
cycles and the timing of the invoices by the clinical trial
partners.
Manufacturing
Scale-up Expenses
Estimates
have been used in determining the expense liability under certain manufacturing
scale-up contracts where services have been performed but not yet invoiced. The
actual costs of those services could differ in amount and timing from the
estimates used in completing the financial results.
Manufacturing
expenses of $21,000 have been accrued at September 30, 2008. These estimates are
based on the milestones completed for each of the service
contracts.
21
Stock
Based Compensation
We
account for stock based payments in accordance with SFAS No. 123R “Share-Based
Payments”. The costs of these equity-settled transactions are determined using a
binomial model to calculate the fair value at the date on which they are
granted. With respect to the fair value of the 62,091 warrants representing
248,364 warrant shares issued August 6, 2007 to Blue Trading, LLC as part of a
placement fee, and the warrant representing 46,083 warrant shares issued to Mr
J.O’Connor July 30, 2008, in consideration for investor relations services
rendered, the following assumptions were used:
August
6, 2007
|
July
30, 2008
|
|
Dividend
yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
71%
|
81%
|
Historical
volatility
|
71%
|
81%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
4.13%
|
3.36%
|
Expected
life of warrant
|
5
years
|
5
years
|
Warrant
fair value
|
$1.777
|
$1.41
|
The
dividend yield reflects the assumption that the current dividend payout, which
is zero, will continue with no anticipated increases. The expected life of the
warrant is based on historical data and is not necessarily indicative of
exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the
assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which
may also not necessarily be the actual outcome.
The
Company’s stock option plan provides for the grant of options to the Company’s
directors, employees, employees of the Company’s affiliates and certain of the
Company’s contractors and consultants. To date, no options have been issued
under the plan.
22
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
We
recorded a consolidated loss of $2,252,000 and $3,366,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Revenues: We received interest
on cash assets and cash equivalents and short term investments of $96,000 for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $218,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily due to lower
interest rates in the U.S. earned by our cash deposits.
Research and Development:
Research and development expenses decreased $828,000 to $2,078,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $2,906,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2007. The reduction was due primarily to the manufacturing
scale-up of phenoxodiol which is nearing completion.
Selling, General and Administrative:
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $408,000 to
$269,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $677,000 for
the three months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily due to net
foreign exchange gains, as described below, and reduced spending on public
relations, partially offset by additional legal fees and share based payment
expense incurred in the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Foreign
exchange gains/(losses) are included in selling, general and administrative
expenses and occur when revaluing cash denominated in foreign currencies and
upon consolidation of our wholly owned subsidiary Marshall Edwards Pty Ltd
(“MEPL”). MEPL uses U.S. dollars as its functional currency and also engages in
transactions in foreign currencies. Further, MEPL’s accounts and financial
statements are denominated in Australian dollars. Translation of MEPL’s
financial statements into U.S. dollars did not have a material impact on our
financial position however exchange rates are volatile in the current market
resulting from the global financial crisis. At September 30, 2008, we had not
established a foreign currency hedging program. Net foreign exchange gains
during the three months ended September 30, 2008 were $408,000 compared with
foreign exchange losses of $104,000 during the three months ended September 30,
2007.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
September 30, 2008, we had cash resources of $26,941,000 compared to $19,743,000
at June 30, 2008. The increase was due to the registered direct offering in July
2008, as described below, which was partially offset by expenditures in the
clinical trial program and other corporate expenses incurred in the period.
Funds are invested in short term money market accounts, pending
use.
On August
1, 2007, we entered into a securities subscription agreement with certain
accredited investors providing for the placement of 5,464,001 shares of our
common stock at a purchase price of $3.00 per share. The investors in the
transaction also received a warrant to purchase an additional 4 shares of common
stock for every block of 10 shares of common stock purchased. All of the
warrants have an exercise price of $3.60 per share.
23
The
warrants may be exercised beginning February 6, 2008 and will expire five years
from the date of issuance, or August 6, 2012. We also issued 62,091 warrants to
Blue Trading, LLC, which acted as the placement agent in the private placement
or PIPE, as part of the placement fee. The warrants issued to Blue Trading, LLC
have an exercise price of $3.00 per share and each warrant is convertible for 4
shares of common stock. These warrants may be exercised immediately and will
expire five years from the date of issuance, on August 6, 2012. We closed the
private placement on August 6, 2007 and we received proceeds of $15.2 million
net of $1.2 million commissions and other costs.
We have
entered into a registration rights agreement with the investors party to the
securities subscription agreement and Blue Trading, LLC, and agreed to file a
registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)
for the common stock and the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants
sold pursuant to the securities subscription agreement for resale thereunder. We
filed the registration statement on October 2, 2007. The resale registration
statement was declared effective on October 19, 2007.
In
connection with our preparation to raise additional funds, we filed a shelf
registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-149807)(the “Shelf Registration
Statement”) with the SEC in March 2008. The Shelf Registration Statement was
declared effective by the SEC on April 3, 2008. The Shelf Registration Statement
permits us to sell, from time to time, up to $75,000,000 of common stock,
preferred stock and warrants or any combination of the foregoing. Pursuant to
SEC regulations, however, we cannot sell securities from the Shelf Registration
Statement which represent more than one third of our public float during any
12-month period.
On July
28, 2008 we entered into a Securities Subscription Agreement with Novogen and
OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“Oppenheimer”) pursuant to which we sold 2,908,295 and
1,700,000 shares of common stock to Novogen and Oppenheimer, respectively, with
Oppenheimer acting as adviser to each of the following parties severally and not
jointly: (i) Oppenheimer International Growth Fund; (ii) Mass Mutual
International Equity Fund; (iii) Oppenheimer International Growth Fund/VA; (iv)
AZL Oppenheimer International Growth Fund; (v) OFITC International Growth Fund;
and (vi) OFI International Equity Fund, at a purchase price of $2.17 per share,
the consolidated closing bid price of our Common Stock as quoted by the Nasdaq
Market Intelligence Desk at 4:00 PM EST on July 28, 2008. The shares
were registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”) under the Shelf Registration Statement. We received gross proceeds of
$10 million from the sale of the shares.
Following
the closing of the registered direct offering described above in July 2008,
Novogen retained approximately 71.3% of the our common stock.
In July
2008, we also issued a warrant to Mr. John O’Connor exercisable for 46,083
shares of common stock, as consideration for investor relation services rendered
by him to us. The warrant has an exercise price of $2.17 per share. The warrant
may be exercised immediately and expires five years from the date of issuance,
on July 30, 2013. The warrant has not been registered under the Securities Act.
We issued the warrant to Mr. O’Connor in a private placement made in reliance
upon the exemption from securities registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act.
24
Source
and Uses of Cash
Cash
Used in Operating Activities
Cash used
in operating activities for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was
$2,726,000 compared to $2,432,000 for the same period in 2007. The increase in
cash outflow of $294,000 was due primarily to increased cash outflows incurred
in connection with the increased costs associated with the Phase III OVATURE
trial.
Cash
Requirements
We are
currently conducting the OVATURE Phase III clinical study to support marketing
approval of phenoxodiol for ovarian cancer.
Ongoing
operations through the conduct of the clinical trial program will continue to
consume cash resources without generating revenues.
We
believe that the proceeds from the registered direct offering closed in July
2008 provides us with sufficient cash resources to fund operations over the next
twelve months which include progressing the Phase III OVATURE
trial.
Due to
the uncertainty in the financial markets, we do not anticipate being able to
raise additional funds through the equity markets in the short to medium term as
a result we are progressing the development of triphendiol to an IND and we have
put on hold the development of NV-143. This will enable us to conserve cash and
focus our resources on conducting the OVATURE trial. We will however need
additional funds in order complete the OVATURE trial and to progress the
clinical development program for triphendiol and NV-143 beyond the current
objectives. In order to obtain the additional funding necessary to conduct our
business, we may need to rely on collaboration and /or licensing
opportunities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise the
funds necessary to complete the OVATURE trial or find appropriate collaboration
or licensing opportunities.
Payments
to Novogen
Future
payments to Novogen under the terms of the Phenoxodiol License Agreement, the
License Amendment Deed for Phenoxodiol, the Further Amended and Restated License
Agreement and the License Agreement for Triphendiol and NV-143 are detailed in
Note 5 of the financial statements “Related Party Transactions” on page 12 of
this Quarterly Report
We will
also be required to make payments to Novogen under the Services Agreement and
Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement.
We do not
intend to incur any significant capital expenditures in the foreseeable
future.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not
currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
25
Contractual
Obligations
For
details of our contractual obligations at September 30, 2008 see Note 3 to the
financial statements “Expenditure Commitments on page 11 of this Quarterly
Report.
26
Item
3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
We place
cash in “on call” deposits and short term investments with high quality
financial institutions.
We do not
consider the effects of interest rate movements to be a material risk to our
financial condition. We do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge our
risks associated with the fluctuations of interest rates.
Foreign
Currency Risk
We
conduct our business in various currencies, primarily in U.S. and Australian
dollars. At September 30, 2008, we had not established a foreign currency
hedging program. Net foreign exchange gains during the three months ended
September 30, 2008 were $408,000 compared with net foreign exchange losses of
$104,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2007. Foreign exchange
gains and losses occur upon consolidation of MEPL, which uses U.S. dollars as
its functional currency and also engages in transactions in foreign currencies.
MEPL’s accounts are denominated in Australian dollars. Translation of MEPL’s
financial statements into U.S. dollars did not have a material impact on our
financial position however exchange rates are volatile in the current market
resulting from the global financial crisis.
We do not
consider the effects of foreign currency movements to be a material risk to our
financial condition.
27
Item
4T: Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
At the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our management, with the
participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on this evaluation, our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the
period covered by this Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
28
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1A: Risk Factors
Set forth
below in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in other documents we file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, our most
recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, are risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by
the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We believe
that these risks and uncertainties are the principal material risks facing the
Company as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In the future, we
may become subject to additional risks that are not currently known to us. If
any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and
operating results could be seriously harmed. As a result, the trading price of
our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of the value of
your investment.
We
may not be able to complete our OVATURE clinical trial if we believe that the
trial does not demonstrate efficacy, or if we encounter serious safety issues or
if we do not complete patient recruitment in a timely
manner.
The
OVATURE clinical trial may be terminated by us following the review of
recommendations by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee for many reasons
including, but not limited to, if:
·
|
patients
experience an unacceptable rate or severity of adverse side
effects;
|
·
|
patient
numbers are not available to enrol at the expected rate or trial sites are
unable to recruit their target patient numbers due to the strict inclusion
criteria of the OVATURE protocol which may reduce the patient pool
available to participate in the trial;
or
|
·
|
we
are unable to negotiate with the FDA additional patient recruitment time
in order to achieve our targeted patient recruitment
numbers.
|
The
recent global financial crisis may negatively impact our liquidity and clinical
trials, including the OVATURE trial, by precluding us from raising funds through
equity investments on terms favorable to us or at all.
We have
traditionally raised capital through the sale of equity securities to
investors. Recently the financial services industry and credit
markets have experienced a period of unprecedented turmoil characterized by
bankruptcy, failure and collapse or sale of various financial institutions.
Although the ultimate outcome of these events cannot be predicted, they may
preclude us from raising the capital necessary to finance our business
operations, including our clinical trials such as the OVATURE trial, through the
sale of equity securities on terms favorable to us or at all. In order to obtain
the additional funding necessary to conduct our business, we may need to rely on
collaboration and /or licensing opportunities. We cannot assure you
that we will be able to raise the funds necessary to complete the OVATURE trial
or find appropriate collaboration or licensing opportunities.
29
Item
6: Exhibits
Exhibit
Index
Exhibits
31.1
|
Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
|
31.2
|
Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
|
32.1
|
Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C
1350).
|
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this Quarterly Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
MARSHALL
EDWARDS, INC.
/s/ DAVID SEATON
David R.
SeatonChief
Financial Offer
(Duly
Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Date:
November 4, 2008
31
Exhibit
31.1
CERTIFICATION
I,
Christopher Naughton, certify that:
1.
|
I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marshall Edwards,
Inc.;
|
2.
|
Based
on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;
|
3.
|
Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly
Report;
|
4.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) ) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
|
(a)
|
Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within the
entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is
being prepared;
|
(b)
|
Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
(c)
|
Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in the Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of this disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation;
and
|
(d)
|
Disclosed
in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
|
5.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
board of directors:
|
(a)
|
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
(b)
|
Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.
|
Date:
November 4,
2008
/s/CHRISTOPHER NAUGHTON
Christopher
Naughton
Chief
Executive Officer
32
Exhibit
31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, David
Ross Seaton, certify that:
1.
|
I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marshall Edwards,
Inc.;
|
2.
|
Based
on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;
|
3.
|
Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly
Report;
|
4.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) ) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
|
(a)
|
Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within the
entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is
being prepared;
|
(b)
|
Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
(c)
|
Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in the Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of this disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation;
and
|
(d)
|
Disclosed
in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
|
5.
|
The
Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors:
|
(a)
|
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
(b)
|
Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.
|
Date: November 4,
2008
/s/ DAVID SEATON
David R.
Seaton
Chief
Financial Officer
33
Exhibit
32.1
CERTIFICATION
Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Christopher Naughton, the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Marshall Edwards, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), and David R. Seaton, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, each hereby certifies that, to his or her knowledge:
1.
|
The
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 “Form
10-Q”, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
|
2.
|
The
information contained in the “Form 10-Q” fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of the
period covered by the Form 10-Q and results of operations of the
registrant for the period covered by the Form
10-Q.
|
These
certifications accompanying the Form 10-Q to which they relate, are not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
Dated:
November 4, 2008
/s/
CHRISTOPHER
NAUGHTON
Christopher
Naughton
Chief Executive
Officer
/s/ DAVID
SEATON
David R.
Seaton
Chief Financial
Officer
34