Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
-OR-
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-33647
MercadoLibre, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
98-0212790 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
Arias 3751, 7th Floor
Buenos Aires, C1430CRG, Argentina
(Address of registrants principal executive offices)
011-54-11-4640-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock,
as of the latest practicable date.
44,142,020 shares of the issuers common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of August
3, 2011.
MERCADOLIBRE, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
and for the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Audited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
44,250,132 |
|
|
$ |
56,830,466 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
72,384,019 |
|
|
|
5,342,766 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
14,984,136 |
|
|
|
12,618,173 |
|
Funds receivable from customers |
|
|
7,910,434 |
|
|
|
6,151,518 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
1,331,890 |
|
|
|
913,262 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
12,396,948 |
|
|
|
12,911,256 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,964,157 |
|
|
|
6,867,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
159,221,716 |
|
|
|
101,635,208 |
|
Non-current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
50,201,025 |
|
|
|
78,846,281 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
31,316,388 |
|
|
|
20,817,712 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
61,356,716 |
|
|
|
60,496,314 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
3,819,064 |
|
|
|
4,141,167 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,939,191 |
|
|
|
2,975,118 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
671,876 |
|
|
|
771,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
149,304,260 |
|
|
|
168,047,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
308,525,976 |
|
|
$ |
269,683,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
20,333,485 |
|
|
$ |
17,232,103 |
|
Funds payable to customers |
|
|
58,176,211 |
|
|
|
48,788,225 |
|
Payroll and social security payable |
|
|
10,545,802 |
|
|
|
10,786,534 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
8,061,079 |
|
|
|
11,487,574 |
|
Loans payable and other financial liabilities |
|
|
105,498 |
|
|
|
100,031 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
3,531,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
100,753,412 |
|
|
|
88,394,467 |
|
Non-current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll and social security payable |
|
|
3,106,880 |
|
|
|
2,562,343 |
|
Loans payable and other financial liabilities |
|
|
125,721 |
|
|
|
188,846 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
4,726,032 |
|
|
|
5,167,699 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
2,184,761 |
|
|
|
1,651,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
10,143,394 |
|
|
|
9,570,286 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
110,896,806 |
|
|
$ |
97,964,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 110,000,000 shares authorized,
44,141,707 and 44,131,376 shares issued and outstanding at June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
$ |
44,142 |
|
|
$ |
44,131 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
120,429,310 |
|
|
|
120,391,622 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
95,498,168 |
|
|
|
73,681,556 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(18,342,450 |
) |
|
|
(22,399,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
197,629,170 |
|
|
|
171,718,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
308,525,976 |
|
|
$ |
269,683,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
130,837,828 |
|
|
$ |
98,448,105 |
|
|
$ |
69,378,160 |
|
|
$ |
52,510,331 |
|
Cost of net revenues |
|
|
(31,270,822 |
) |
|
|
(21,304,611 |
) |
|
|
(16,939,118 |
) |
|
|
(11,411,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
99,567,006 |
|
|
|
77,143,494 |
|
|
|
52,439,042 |
|
|
|
41,098,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and technology development |
|
|
(10,675,783 |
) |
|
|
(7,201,240 |
) |
|
|
(5,518,892 |
) |
|
|
(3,976,466 |
) |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
(28,865,357 |
) |
|
|
(22,581,944 |
) |
|
|
(15,636,413 |
) |
|
|
(11,473,145 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(19,183,316 |
) |
|
|
(13,041,477 |
) |
|
|
(9,732,340 |
) |
|
|
(6,834,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
(58,724,456 |
) |
|
|
(42,824,661 |
) |
|
|
(30,887,645 |
) |
|
|
(22,284,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
40,842,550 |
|
|
|
34,318,833 |
|
|
|
21,551,397 |
|
|
|
18,814,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other financial gains |
|
|
4,123,668 |
|
|
|
1,711,529 |
|
|
|
2,249,898 |
|
|
|
917,388 |
|
Interest expense and other financial charges |
|
|
(1,509,769 |
) |
|
|
(6,351,339 |
) |
|
|
(880,819 |
) |
|
|
(3,355,921 |
) |
Foreign currency (loss) / gain |
|
|
(1,203,369 |
) |
|
|
361,494 |
|
|
|
(702,714 |
) |
|
|
(35,478 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
260,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income / asset tax expense |
|
|
42,513,521 |
|
|
|
30,040,517 |
|
|
|
22,457,859 |
|
|
|
16,340,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income / asset tax expense |
|
|
(13,635,062 |
) |
|
|
(8,745,954 |
) |
|
|
(7,637,033 |
) |
|
|
(4,666,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28,878,459 |
|
|
$ |
21,294,563 |
|
|
$ |
14,820,826 |
|
|
$ |
11,673,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
44,134,763 |
|
|
|
44,117,364 |
|
|
|
44,138,105 |
|
|
|
44,121,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
44,149,911 |
|
|
|
44,142,829 |
|
|
|
44,152,296 |
|
|
|
44,145,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
income / (loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,120,269 |
|
|
$ |
44,120 |
|
|
$ |
120,257,998 |
|
|
$ |
17,656,537 |
|
|
$ |
(23,765,418 |
) |
|
$ |
114,193,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,626 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,449 |
|
Stock-based compensation stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
Stock-based compensation restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,696 |
|
Stock-based compensation LTRP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,923 |
|
LTRP shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,981 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,294,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,294,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,294,563 |
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(1,468,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,468,912 |
) |
|
|
(1,468,912 |
) |
Unrealized net loss on investments |
|
|
(386,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(386,935 |
) |
|
|
(386,935 |
) |
Realized net gain on investments |
|
|
(27,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,630 |
) |
|
|
(27,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
19,411,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,128,876 |
|
|
$ |
44,129 |
|
|
$ |
120,375,178 |
|
|
$ |
38,951,100 |
|
|
$ |
(25,648,895 |
) |
|
$ |
133,721,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,750 |
|
Stock-based compensation stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
Stock-based compensation restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation LTRP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,730,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,730,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,730,456 |
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
2,817,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,817,394 |
|
|
|
2,817,394 |
|
Unrealized net gains on investments |
|
|
432,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,462 |
|
|
|
432,462 |
|
Realized net gains on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
37,980,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,131,376 |
|
|
$ |
44,131 |
|
|
$ |
120,391,622 |
|
|
$ |
73,681,556 |
|
|
$ |
(22,399,039 |
) |
|
$ |
171,718,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
income / (loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,131,376 |
|
|
$ |
44,131 |
|
|
$ |
120,391,622 |
|
|
$ |
73,681,556 |
|
|
$ |
(22,399,039 |
) |
|
$ |
171,718,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,637 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,706 |
|
Stock-based compensation LTRP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,993 |
|
Dividend Distribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,061,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,061,847 |
) |
LTRP shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,694 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28,878,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,878,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,878,459 |
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
3,720,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,720,681 |
|
|
|
3,720,681 |
|
Unrealized net gains on investments |
|
|
381,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,435 |
|
|
|
381,435 |
|
Realized net gain on investments |
|
|
(45,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,527 |
) |
|
|
(45,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
32,935,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,141,707 |
|
|
$ |
44,142 |
|
|
$ |
120,429,310 |
|
|
$ |
95,498,168 |
|
|
$ |
(18,342,450 |
) |
|
$ |
197,629,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Cash flows from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28,878,459 |
|
|
$ |
21,294,563 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,305,795 |
|
|
|
2,187,353 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
(2,353,234 |
) |
|
|
(37,763 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,696 |
|
LTRP accrued compensation |
|
|
2,303,542 |
|
|
|
1,515,662 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,484,213 |
|
|
|
(1,099,249 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(164,556 |
) |
|
|
(4,578,556 |
) |
Funds receivable from customers |
|
|
(1,779,329 |
) |
|
|
247,441 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(393,477 |
) |
|
|
51,734 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,067,637 |
|
|
|
(1,735,721 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(5,766,185 |
) |
|
|
5,249,442 |
|
Funds payable to customers |
|
|
6,718,843 |
|
|
|
4,738,946 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
430,606 |
|
|
|
(1,779,899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
33,732,314 |
|
|
|
26,091,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(200,995,988 |
) |
|
|
(64,252,379 |
) |
Proceeds from sale and maturity of investments |
|
|
171,094,260 |
|
|
|
26,860,341 |
|
Purchases of intangible assets |
|
|
(108,823 |
) |
|
|
(12,733 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(13,247,416 |
) |
|
|
(3,906,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(43,257,967 |
) |
|
|
(41,311,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in loans payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,993,985 |
) |
Dividends distribution |
|
|
(3,530,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
10,706 |
|
|
|
5,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(3,519,804 |
) |
|
|
(2,988,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
465,123 |
|
|
|
(26,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(12,580,334 |
) |
|
|
(18,234,682 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
56,830,466 |
|
|
|
49,803,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
$ |
44,250,132 |
|
|
$ |
31,568,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
26,426 |
|
|
$ |
5,753,706 |
|
Cash paid for income and asset taxes |
|
$ |
14,806,871 |
|
|
$ |
10,377,362 |
|
6
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
MercadoLibre Inc. (the Company) is an e-commerce enabler whose mission is to build the
necessary online and technology tools to allow practically anyone to trade almost anything,
helping to make inefficient markets more efficient in Latin America. |
|
|
The Company developed a web-based marketplace in which buyers and sellers are brought together
to browse, buy and sell items such as computers, electronics, collectibles, automobiles,
clothing and a host of practical and miscellaneous items. Additionally, the Company introduced
MercadoPago in 2004, an integrated online payments solution. MercadoPago was designed to
facilitate transactions on the MercadoLibre Marketplace by providing an escrow mechanism that
enables users to send and receive payments online. |
|
|
Since 2004, the Company introduced an online classifieds platform for motor vehicles, vessels
and aircrafts and since 2006 the real state online classifieds platform. In 2006, the Company
launched eShops, a new platform tailored to attract lower rotation items and increase the
breadth of products offered, the introduction of user generated information guides for buyers
that improve the shopping experience, and the expansion of the online classifieds model by
adding the services category. |
|
|
During 2007 the Company also launched a new and improved version of its MercadoPago payments
platform in Chile and Colombia as well as in Argentina during 2008. The new MercadoPago, in
addition to improving the ease of use and efficiency of payments for marketplace purchases,
also allows for payments outside of the Companys marketplaces. Users are able to transfer
money to other users with MercadoPago accounts and to incorporate MercadoPago as a means of
payments in their independent commerce websites. In this way MercadoPago 3.0 as it has been
called is designed to meet the growing demand for Internet based payments systems in Latin
America. On March 30, 2010, the Company started processing off-MercadoLibre transactions
through its new direct payments product to any site in Brazil which elects to adopt it. On July
16, 2010, the Company launched MercadoPago 3.0 in Brazil for all of its marketplace
transactions. In February 2011, the Company started processing off-platform transactions in
Mexico using its new direct payments product, MercadoPago 3.0, for any site in Mexico that
elects to adopt it, while maintaining the escrow product for on-platform transactions. On April
15, 2011, the Company launched a new and improved version of its MercadoPago payments platform
for all its marketplace transactions in Mexico. |
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, operated online
commerce platforms directed towards Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican
Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Portugal, Uruguay and Venezuela, and online payments
solutions directed towards Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela, Chile and Colombia. In
addition, the Company operates a real estate classified platform that covers some areas of
Florida, U.S.A. |
7
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.
GAAP) and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. These
financial statements are stated in US dollars. All intercompany transactions and balances have
been eliminated. |
|
|
Substantially all revenues and operating costs are generated in the Companys foreign
operations, amounting to approximately 99.6% and 99.4% of the consolidated totals during the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Long-lived assets located in the
foreign operations totaled $90,339,470 and $81,834,265 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents as well as short and long-term investments,
totaling $166,835,176 and $141,019,513 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively,
are mainly located in the United States of America and Brazil. |
|
|
These unaudited interim condensed financial statements reflect the Companys consolidated
financial position as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. These statements also show the
Companys consolidated statement of income for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, its consolidated statement of shareholders equity and its consolidated
statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. These
statements include all normal recurring adjustments that management believes are necessary to
fairly state the Companys financial position, operating results and cash flows. |
|
|
Because all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America for annual consolidated financial statements are not included herein,
these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial
statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010, contained in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
on February 25, 2011. The condensed consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and
cash flows for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results expected for any
future period. |
|
|
The Company generates revenues for different services provided. When more than one
service is included in one single arrangement with the customer, the Company recognizes
revenue according to multiple element arrangements accounting, distinguishing between
each of the services provided and allocating revenues based on their respective selling prices. |
8
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
|
Revenue Recognition (Continued) |
|
|
Revenues are recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or
determinable, no significant obligation remains and collection of the receivable is reasonably
assured. |
|
|
Services are separately recognized as revenue according to the following criteria described for
each type of services: |
|
|
|
Services for intermediation between on-line buyers and sellers, for which the company charges
a percentage on the transaction value (final value fees), are recognized as revenue once the
sale transaction between the buyer and seller is successfully completed (which occurs upon
confirmation of the sale by the seller). |
|
|
|
Services for the use of the Companys on-line payments solution, for transactions
off-platform ordered by MercadoPago customers. The Company does not charge a separate fee for
on-platform transactions in certain countries. The fee that we charge for all off-marketplace
platform transactions is recorded as revenue once the transaction is completed, at the time
when the payment is processed by the Company. For on-marketplace platform transactions, we
generate revenue in the countries where we offer the service in a way that implies that the
customer has to pay an additional fee for the right to use the payments solution. |
|
|
|
Listing and optional feature services, which fees relate to the right of a seller to have the
item offered listed in a preferential way, as well as classified advertising services, are
recorded as revenue ratably during the listing period. Those fees are charged at the time the
listing is uploaded onto the Companys platform and is not subject to successful sale of the
items listed. |
|
|
|
Advertising revenues such as the sale of banners are recognized on accrual basis, and
MercadoClics services or sponsorship of sites are recognized based on per-click values and as
the impressions are delivered. |
|
|
Credit cards receivables from customers mainly relate to the Companys payments solution
and arise due to the time taken to clear transactions through external payment networks or
during a short period of time until those credit cards receivables are sold to financial
institutions. |
|
|
The company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that may result
from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Allowances are based upon
several factors including, but not limited to, historical experience and the current condition
of specific customers. |
9
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
|
Credit Cards Receivables (Continued) |
|
|
Credit cards receivables are presented net of the related allowance for doubtful accounts and
chargebacks. |
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, there are no past due credit card receivables. |
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation |
|
|
All of the Companys foreign operations have determined the local currency to be their
functional currency, except for Venezuela, as described below. Accordingly, these foreign
subsidiaries translate assets and liabilities from their local currencies to U.S. dollars
using year end exchange rates while income and expense accounts are translated at the average
rates in effect during the year. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded as part of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of shareholders equity. Gains and
losses resulting from transactions denominated in non-functional currencies are recognized in
earnings. Net foreign currency transaction results are included in the consolidated statements
of income under the caption Foreign currency loss and amounted to $(702,714) and $(35,478)
for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Foreign currency (loss) / gain amounted to
$(1,203,369) and $361,494, respectively |
|
|
Until September 30, 2009, the Company translated its Venezuelan subsidiaries assets,
liabilities, income and expense accounts at the official rate of 2.15 Bolivares Fuertes
per US dollar. |
|
|
Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, as a result of the changes in facts and circumstances
that affected the Companys ability to convert currency for dividends remittances using the
official exchange rate in Venezuela, the Venezuelan subsidiaries assets, liabilities, income
and expense accounts were translated using the parallel exchange rate resulting in the
recognition in that quarter of a currency translation loss adjustment of $16,977,276 recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss). The average exchange rate used for
translating the fourth quarter of 2009 results was 5.67 Bolivares Fuertes per US dollar and
the year-end exchange rate used for translating assets and liabilities was 6.05 Bolivares
Fuertes per US dollar. |
|
|
As of the date of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements the Company did not
buy US dollars at the official rate of 2.15 Bolivares Fuertes per US dollar. |
|
|
According to US GAAP, we have transitioned our Venezuelan operations to highly inflationary
status as of January 1, 2010 considering the US dollar as the functional currency. See Highly
inflationary status in Venezuela below. |
|
|
Therefore, no translation effect was accounted for in other comprehensive income since January
1, 2010 related to our Venezuelan operations. |
10
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation (Continued) |
|
|
Until May 13, 2010, the only way by which US dollars could be purchased outside the official
currency market was using an indirect mechanism consisting in the purchase and sale of
securities, including national public debt bonds (DPNs) denominated in Bolivares Fuertes and
bonds issued by the government that were denominated in U.S. dollars. This mechanism for
transactions in certain securities created an indirect parallel foreign currency exchange
market in Venezuela that enabled entities to obtain foreign currency through financial brokers
without going through Commission for the Administration of Foreign Exchange
(CADIVI). Although the parallel exchange rate was higher, and accordingly less
beneficial, than the official exchange rate, some entities used the parallel market to
exchange currency because of the delays of CADIVI in approving in a timely manner the exchange
of currency requested by such entities. Until May 13, 2010, our Venezuelan subsidiaries used
this mechanism to buy US dollars and accordingly we used the parallel average exchange rate to
re-measure those foreign currency transactions. |
|
|
However, on May 14th, 2010, the Venezuelan government enacted reforms to its exchange
regulations and close-down such parallel market by declaring that foreign-currency-denominated
securities issued by Venezuelan entities were included in the definition of foreign currency,
thus making the Venezuelan Central Bank (BCV) the only institution that could legally
authorize the purchase or sale of foreign currency bonds, thereby excluding non-authorized
brokers from the foreign exchange market. |
|
|
Trading of foreign currencies was re-opened as a regulated market on June 9, 2010 with the
Venezuelan Central Bank as the only institution through which foreign currency-denominated
transactions can be brokered. Under the new system, known as the Foreign
Currency Securities Transactions System (SITME), entities domiciled in Venezuela can buy U.S.
dollardenominated securities only through banks authorized by the BCV to import goods,
services or capital inputs. Additionally, the SITME imposes volume restrictions on an entitys
trading activity, limiting such activity to a maximum equivalent of $50,000 per day, not to
exceed $350,000 in a calendar month. This limitation is non-cumulative, meaning that an entity
cannot carry over unused volume from one month to the next. |
|
|
As a consequence of this new system, commencing on June 9, 2010, we have transitioned from the
parallel exchange rate to the SITME rate and started re-measuring
foreign currency transactions using the SITME rate published by BCV, which was 5.27 Bolivares Fuertes per
U.S. dollar as of June 9, 2010. |
|
|
For the period beginning on May 14, 2010 and ending on June 8, 2010 (during which there was no
open foreign currency markets) we applied US GAAP guidelines, which state that if
exchangeability between two currencies is temporarily lacking at the transaction date or
balance sheet date, the first subsequent rate at which exchanges could be made shall be used. |
11
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation (Continued) |
|
|
Accordingly, the June 9, 2010 exchange rate published by the Venezuelan Central Bank has been
used to re-measure transactions during the abovementioned period. As of June 30, 2011, the
exchange rate used to re-measure transactions is 5.30 Bolivares Fuertes per U.S. dollar. |
|
|
The following table sets forth the assets, liabilities and net assets of the Companys
Venezuelan subsidiaries, before intercompany eliminations, as of June 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venezuelan operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
21,299,401 |
|
|
$ |
21,928,340 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
(7,547,390 |
) |
|
|
(8,212,581 |
) |
Net Assets |
|
|
13,752,011 |
|
|
|
13,715,759 |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, net assets of the Venezuelan subsidiaries (before intercompany
eliminations) amount to approximately 7.0% of our consolidated net assets, and cash and
investments of the Venezuelan subsidiaries held in local currency in Venezuela amount to
approximately 2.9% of our consolidated cash and investments. |
|
|
Although, the current mechanisms available to obtain US dollars for dividends distributions to
shareholders outside Venezuela imply increased restrictions, the Company does not expect that
the current restrictions to purchase dollars have a significant adverse effect on its business
plans with regard to the investment in Venezuela. |
|
|
Highly inflationary status in Venezuela |
|
|
During May 2009, the International Practices Task Force discussed the highly inflationary
status of the Venezuelan economy. Historically, the Task Force has used the Consumer Price
Index (CPI) when considering the inflationary status of the Venezuelan economy. |
|
|
The CPI has existed since 1984. However, the CPI covers only the cities of Caracas and
Maracaibo. Commencing on January 1, 2008, the National Consumer Price Index (NCPI) has been
developed to cover the entire country of Venezuela. Since inflation data is not available to
compute a cumulative three year inflation rate for the entire country solely based on the NCPI,
the Company uses a blended rate using the NCPI and CPI to calculate Venezuelan inflation rate. |
12
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation (Continued) |
|
|
The cumulative three year inflation rate as of December 31, 2009 was calculated using the CPI
information for periods before January 1, 2008 and NCPI information for the period after
January 1, 2008. The blended CPI/NCPI three-year inflation index (23 months of NCPI and 13
months of CPI) as of November 30, 2009 exceeded 100%. According to US GAAP, calendar year-end
companies should apply highly inflationary accounting as from January 1, 2010. Therefore, the
Company transitioned its Venezuelan operations to highly inflationary status as of January 1,
2010 considering the US dollar as the functional currency. |
|
|
The Companys subsidiaries in Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela and Colombia are subject to certain
taxes on revenues which are classified as cost of revenues. Taxes on revenues totaled
$5,288,963 and $3,616,846 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Taxes on revenues totaled $9,750,510 and $6,624,934 for the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
|
The Company is subject to U.S. and foreign income taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes
following the liability method of accounting which requires the recognition of deferred tax
liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred
tax assets are also recognized for tax loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets or liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that
includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded when, based on the available
evidence, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the Companys deferred tax assets
will not be realized. The Companys income tax expense consists of taxes currently payable, if
any, plus the change during the period in the Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities. |
|
|
From fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2014, the Companys Argentine subsidiary is a beneficiary
of a software development law. Part of the benefits obtained from being a beneficiary of the
aforementioned law is a relief of 60% of total income tax determined in each year, until fiscal
year 2014. Aggregate tax benefit totaled $1,356,432 and $1,180,802 for the three-month periods
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Aggregate tax benefit totaled $2,535,435 and
$1,970,487 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Aggregate per
share effect of the Argentine tax holiday amounts to $0.03 and $0.03 for the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Aggregate per share effect of the Argentine
tax holiday amounts to $0.06 and $0.04 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. If the Company had not been granted the Argentine tax holiday, the Company would
have pursued an alternative tax
planning strategy and, therefore, the impact of not having this particular benefit would not
necessarily be the abovementioned dollar and per share effect. |
13
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
|
Income and Asset Taxes (Continued) |
|
|
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, MercadoLibre, Inc has included in the non-current
deferred tax assets line the foreign tax credits related to the dividend distributions received
from its subsidiaries for a total amount of $1,395,465 and $2,436,224, respectively. Those
foreign tax credits will be used to offset the future domestic income tax payable. |
|
|
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used for, but not limited to accounting for
allowance for doubtful accounts, depreciation, amortization, impairment and
useful lives of long-lived assets, compensation cost related to cash and share-based
compensation and restricted shares, recognition of current and deferred income taxes and
contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
|
Comprehensive income is comprised of two components, net income and other comprehensive income
(loss), and defined as all other changes in equity of the Company that result from transactions
other than with shareholders. Other comprehensive income (loss) includes the cumulative
translation adjustment relating to the translation of the financial statements of the Companys
foreign subsidiaries and unrealized gains on investments classified as available-for-sale
securities. Total comprehensive income for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
amounted to $18,052,267 and $10,420,151, respectively and for the six-month periods ended June
30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $32,935,048 and $19,411,086 respectively. |
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
|
Presentation of Comprehensive Income |
|
|
On June 16, 2011 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an amendment to
disclosures about the presentation of the comprehensive income in the financial statements.
The new guidance provides two ways to present the components of the comprehensive income, in
either (a) a continuous statement of comprehensive income, or (b) two separate but consecutive
statements. The amended disclosures about the presentation of the comprehensive income in the
financial statements are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does
not expect to have a significant impact on the presentation of the consolidated financial
statements. |
14
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued) |
Fair value measurement and disclosure
|
|
In May 2011, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that amends some fair value measurement
principles and it expands the ASC 820 existing disclosure requirements for fair value
measurements. The new guidance states that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation
premise are only relevant when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets and prohibits
the grouping of financial instruments for purposes of determining their fair values
when the unit of account is specified in other guidance. We will adopt this accounting standard
upon its effective date for periods ending on or after December 15, 2011, and do not anticipate
that this adoption will have a significant impact on our financial position or results of
operations. |
Basic earnings per share for the Companys common stock is computed by
dividing net income available to common shareholders attributable to
common stock for the period by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period.
The Companys restricted shares granted to its outside directors were
participating securities. Accordingly, net income available to common
stockholders for the three- and six month periods ended June 30, 2010,
was allocated between unvested restricted shares and common stock
under the two class method for purposes of computing basic and
diluted earnings per share.
Diluted earnings per share for the Companys common stock assume the
exercise of outstanding stock options and vesting restricted shares,
additional shares and shares granted under the 2008 Long Term
Retention Plan under the Companys stock based employee compensation
plans.
The following table shows how net income available to common
shareholders is allocated using the two-class method, for the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
15
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
3. |
|
Net Income per Share (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,820,826 |
|
|
$ |
14,820,826 |
|
|
$ |
11,673,963 |
|
|
$ |
11,673,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
shareholders attributable to unvested
restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
shareholders attributable to common stock |
|
$ |
14,820,826 |
|
|
$ |
14,820,826 |
|
|
$ |
11,672,239 |
|
|
$ |
11,672,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows how net income available to common shareholders is
allocated using the two-class method, for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28,878,459 |
|
|
$ |
28,878,459 |
|
|
$ |
21,294,563 |
|
|
$ |
21,294,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
shareholders attributable to unvested
restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
shareholders attributable to common stock |
|
$ |
28,878,459 |
|
|
$ |
28,878,459 |
|
|
$ |
21,290,980 |
|
|
$ |
21,290,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share of common stock is as follows for the three-month periods ended June
30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
per common share |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
14,820,826 |
|
|
$ |
14,820,826 |
|
|
$ |
11,672,239 |
|
|
$ |
11,672,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of common stock outstanding
for Basic
earnings per share |
|
|
44,138,105 |
|
|
|
44,138,105 |
|
|
|
44,121,087 |
|
|
|
44,121,087 |
|
Adjustment for stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,811 |
|
Adjustment for shares granted under LTRP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average of common stock
outstanding
for Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
44,138,105 |
|
|
|
44,152,296 |
|
|
|
44,121,087 |
|
|
|
44,145,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
3. |
|
Net Income per Share (Continued) |
Net income per share of common stock is as follows for the six-month periods ended June
30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
per common share |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
28,878,459 |
|
|
$ |
28,878,459 |
|
|
$ |
21,290,980 |
|
|
$ |
21,290,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of common stock outstanding for
Basic
earnings per share |
|
|
44,134,763 |
|
|
|
44,134,763 |
|
|
|
44,117,364 |
|
|
|
44,117,364 |
|
Adjustment for stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,454 |
|
Adjustment for shares granted under LTRP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,011 |
|
Adjusted weighted average of common stock
outstanding
for Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
44,134,763 |
|
|
|
44,149,911 |
|
|
|
44,117,364 |
|
|
|
44,142,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The calculation of diluted net income per share excludes all
anti-dilutive shares. For the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, there were no anti-dilutive shares.
4. |
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
The composition of goodwill and intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
61,356,716 |
|
|
$ |
60,496,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets with indefinite lives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Trademarks |
|
|
2,514,136 |
|
|
|
2,460,952 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Licenses and others |
|
|
2,659,646 |
|
|
|
2,606,402 |
|
- Non-compete agreement |
|
|
1,281,426 |
|
|
|
1,241,357 |
|
- Customer list |
|
|
1,623,928 |
|
|
|
1,607,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
8,079,136 |
|
|
$ |
7,915,808 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(4,260,072 |
) |
|
|
(3,774,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
3,819,064 |
|
|
$ |
4,141,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
4. |
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Continued) |
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
Chile |
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Colombia |
|
|
Countries |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
13,130,649 |
|
|
$ |
23,364,326 |
|
|
$ |
7,296,888 |
|
|
$ |
5,025,623 |
|
|
$ |
4,846,030 |
|
|
$ |
5,448,068 |
|
|
$ |
1,384,730 |
|
|
$ |
60,496,314 |
|
- Effect of exchange
rates change |
|
|
884,011 |
|
|
|
(761,757 |
) |
|
|
(2,182 |
) |
|
|
282,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,548 |
|
|
|
48,400 |
|
|
|
860,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of the period |
|
$ |
14,014,660 |
|
|
$ |
22,602,569 |
|
|
$ |
7,294,706 |
|
|
$ |
5,308,005 |
|
|
$ |
4,846,030 |
|
|
$ |
5,857,616 |
|
|
$ |
1,433,130 |
|
|
$ |
61,356,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
Chile |
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Colombia |
|
|
Countries |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
12,565,062 |
|
|
$ |
24,446,463 |
|
|
$ |
6,734,405 |
|
|
$ |
4,770,560 |
|
|
$ |
4,846,030 |
|
|
$ |
5,100,939 |
|
|
$ |
1,359,287 |
|
|
$ |
59,822,746 |
|
- Effect of exchange
rates change |
|
|
565,587 |
|
|
|
(1,082,137 |
) |
|
|
562,483 |
|
|
|
255,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,129 |
|
|
|
25,443 |
|
|
|
673,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of the year |
|
$ |
13,130,649 |
|
|
$ |
23,364,326 |
|
|
$ |
7,296,888 |
|
|
$ |
5,025,623 |
|
|
$ |
4,846,030 |
|
|
$ |
5,448,068 |
|
|
$ |
1,384,730 |
|
|
$ |
60,496,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets
Amortizable intangible assets are comprised of customer lists and
user base, trademarks and trade names, non-compete agreements,
acquired software licenses and other acquired intangible assets
including developed technologies. Aggregate amortization expense
for intangible assets totaled $242,401 and $207,486 for the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets totaled
$478,522 and $380,347 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively.
Expected future intangible asset amortization from acquisitions
completed as of June 30, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For year ended 12/31/2011 |
|
$ |
385,759 |
|
For year ended 12/31/2012 |
|
|
646,539 |
|
For year ended 12/31/2013 |
|
|
270,611 |
|
For year ended 12/31/2014 |
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,304,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting segments are based upon the Companys internal organizational structure, the manner
in which the Companys operations are managed, the criteria used by management to evaluate the
Companys performance, the availability of separate financial information, and overall
materiality considerations.
Segment reporting is based on geography as the main basis of segment breakdown to reflect the
evaluation of the Companys performance defined by the management.
18
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
The MercadoLibre segments include Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Venezuela and other countries
(such as Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, Portugal and
Uruguay).
Direct contribution consists of net revenues from external customers less direct costs. Direct
costs include specific costs of net revenues, sales and marketing expenses, and general and
administrative expenses over which segment managers have direct discretionary control, such as
advertising and marketing programs, customer support expenses, allowances for doubtful
accounts, headcount compensation, third party fees. All corporate related costs have been
excluded from the Companys direct contribution.
Expenses over which segment managers do not currently have discretionary control, such as
certain technology and general and administrative costs, are monitored by management through
shared cost centers and are not evaluated in the measurement of segment performance.
The following tables summarize the financial performance of the Companys reporting segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Countries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
39,932,132 |
|
|
$ |
12,391,873 |
|
|
$ |
5,370,095 |
|
|
$ |
7,234,940 |
|
|
$ |
4,449,120 |
|
|
$ |
69,378,160 |
|
Direct costs |
|
|
(23,926,947 |
) |
|
|
(5,153,807 |
) |
|
|
(2,982,020 |
) |
|
|
(2,847,197 |
) |
|
|
(2,493,570 |
) |
|
|
(37,403,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct contribution |
|
|
16,005,185 |
|
|
|
7,238,066 |
|
|
|
2,388,075 |
|
|
|
4,387,743 |
|
|
|
1,955,550 |
|
|
|
31,974,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses and
indirect costs of net revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,423,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,551,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and
other financial gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,249,898 |
|
Interest expense and
other financial results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(880,819 |
) |
Foreign currency losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(702,714 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income / asset
tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,457,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Countries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
30,781,411 |
|
|
$ |
9,452,261 |
|
|
$ |
4,669,349 |
|
|
$ |
4,468,146 |
|
|
$ |
3,139,164 |
|
|
$ |
52,510,331 |
|
Direct costs |
|
|
(15,992,598 |
) |
|
|
(4,686,452 |
) |
|
|
(2,830,282 |
) |
|
|
(2,192,418 |
) |
|
|
(1,741,164 |
) |
|
|
(27,442,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct contribution |
|
|
14,788,813 |
|
|
|
4,765,809 |
|
|
|
1,839,067 |
|
|
|
2,275,728 |
|
|
|
1,398,000 |
|
|
|
25,067,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses and indirect
costs of net revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,252,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,814,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other financial gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
917,388 |
|
Interest expense and other financial results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,355,921 |
) |
Foreign currency losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income / asset tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,340,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Countries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
74,655,327 |
|
|
$ |
22,971,805 |
|
|
$ |
10,604,428 |
|
|
$ |
14,005,393 |
|
|
$ |
8,600,875 |
|
|
$ |
130,837,828 |
|
Direct costs |
|
|
(44,002,555 |
) |
|
|
(9,580,905 |
) |
|
|
(5,698,379 |
) |
|
|
(5,916,936 |
) |
|
|
(4,593,885 |
) |
|
|
(69,792,660 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct contribution |
|
|
30,652,772 |
|
|
|
13,390,900 |
|
|
|
4,906,049 |
|
|
|
8,088,457 |
|
|
|
4,006,990 |
|
|
|
61,045,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses and indirect costs of net
revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,202,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,842,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other financial gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,123,668 |
|
Interest expense and other financial results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,509,769 |
) |
Foreign currency losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,203,369 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income / asset tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,513,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
|
Countries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
57,132,883 |
|
|
$ |
17,806,507 |
|
|
$ |
9,139,286 |
|
|
$ |
7,943,636 |
|
|
$ |
6,425,793 |
|
|
$ |
98,448,105 |
|
Direct costs |
|
|
(30,855,058 |
) |
|
|
(8,632,236 |
) |
|
|
(5,630,639 |
) |
|
|
(4,106,474 |
) |
|
|
(3,464,689 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,689,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct contribution |
|
|
26,277,825 |
|
|
|
9,174,271 |
|
|
|
3,508,647 |
|
|
|
3,837,162 |
|
|
|
2,961,104 |
|
|
|
45,759,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses and indirect costs of net
revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,440,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,318,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other financial gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,711,529 |
|
Interest expense and other financial results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,351,339 |
) |
Foreign currency gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income / asset tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,040,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
The following table summarizes the allocation of the long-lived tangible assets based on
geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
US long-lived tangible assets |
|
$ |
6,152,698 |
|
|
$ |
3,617,420 |
|
Other countries long-lived
tangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
14,131,697 |
|
|
|
13,580,175 |
|
Brazil |
|
|
3,303,186 |
|
|
|
3,264,625 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
517,919 |
|
|
|
68,878 |
|
Venezuela (*) |
|
|
6,789,815 |
|
|
|
206,815 |
|
Other countries |
|
|
421,073 |
|
|
|
79,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,163,690 |
|
|
$ |
17,200,292 |
|
Total long-lived tangible assets |
|
$ |
31,316,388 |
|
|
$ |
20,817,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
On June 2, 2011, the Companys Venezuelan subsidiary acquired an office property of 992
square meters in a building located in Caracas, Venezuela. The purchase price of $6.6 million
was paid in cash |
The following table summarizes the allocation of the goodwill and intangible assets based
on geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
US intangible assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,507 |
|
Other countries goodwill and intangible
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
23,735,108 |
|
|
|
24,825,718 |
|
Brazil |
|
|
14,019,678 |
|
|
|
13,137,658 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
5,320,769 |
|
|
|
5,043,335 |
|
Venezuela |
|
|
6,595,503 |
|
|
|
6,595,866 |
|
Other countries |
|
|
15,504,722 |
|
|
|
15,031,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,175,780 |
|
|
$ |
64,633,974 |
|
Total goodwill and intangible assets |
|
$ |
65,175,780 |
|
|
$ |
64,637,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
6. |
|
Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities |
The following table summarizes the Companys financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
Balances as of |
|
|
active markets for |
|
|
Balances as of |
|
|
active markets for |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
identical Assets |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
identical Assets |
|
Description |
|
2011 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Funds |
|
$ |
11,651,812 |
|
|
$ |
11,651,812 |
|
|
$ |
14,578,477 |
|
|
$ |
14,578,477 |
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset backed securities |
|
|
19,999,835 |
|
|
|
19,999,835 |
|
|
|
14,319,103 |
|
|
|
14,319,103 |
|
Sovereign Debt
Securities |
|
|
12,050,647 |
|
|
|
12,050,647 |
|
|
|
13,147,239 |
|
|
|
13,147,239 |
|
Corporate Debt
Securities |
|
|
19,721,642 |
|
|
|
19,721,642 |
|
|
|
11,381,761 |
|
|
|
11,381,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial Assets |
|
$ |
63,423,936 |
|
|
$ |
63,423,936 |
|
|
$ |
53,426,580 |
|
|
$ |
53,426,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys financial assets are valued using market prices on active markets (level 1).
Level 1 instrument valuations are obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active
exchange markets involving identical assets. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
Company did not have any assets obtained from readily-available pricing sources for comparable
instruments (level 2) or without observable market values that would require a high level of
judgment to determine fair value (level 3).
The unrealized net gains on short term and long term investments are reported as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company does not anticipate any significant
realized losses associated with those investments in excess of the Companys historical cost.
In addition, as of June 30, 2011, the Company had $70,812,920 of short-term
investments, which consisted of time deposits maintained as held to maturity investments. As of
December 31, 2010, the Company had $45,340,944 of short-term and long-term investments, which
consisted of time deposits considered held to maturity securities. Those investments are
accounted for at amortized cost which, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximates
their fair values.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Companys cash and cash
equivalents approximated their fair value which was held primarily in money markets funds and
bank deposits. In addition, the carrying value of accounts receivables, funds receivables from
customers, other receivables, other assets, accounts payables, social security payables, taxes
payables, loans and provisions and other liabilities approximates their fair values because of
its short term maturity.
22
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
6. |
|
Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) |
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company held no direct
investments in auction rate securities, collateralized debt obligations, structured investment
vehicles. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company does not have any
non-financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of short and long-term investments
classified as available for sale securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign Debt Securities |
|
$ |
1,138,586 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(312 |
) |
|
$ |
1,138,274 |
|
Corporate Debt Securities |
|
|
437,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,960 |
) |
|
|
432,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Short-term
investments |
|
$ |
1,576,372 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,272 |
) |
|
$ |
1,571,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign Debt Securities |
|
$ |
10,813,741 |
|
|
$ |
116,443 |
|
|
$ |
(17,811 |
) |
|
$ |
10,912,373 |
|
Corporate Debt Securities |
|
|
19,164,588 |
|
|
|
144,025 |
|
|
|
(19,797 |
) |
|
|
19,288,816 |
|
Asset Backed Securities (2) |
|
|
19,639,833 |
|
|
|
383,737 |
|
|
|
(23,735 |
) |
|
|
19,999,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-term investments |
|
$ |
49,618,162 |
|
|
$ |
644,205 |
|
|
$ |
(61,343 |
) |
|
$ |
50,201,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
51,194,534 |
|
|
$ |
644,205 |
|
|
$ |
(66,615 |
) |
|
$ |
51,772,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses (1) |
|
|
Value |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Debt Securities |
|
$ |
398,752 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
(773 |
) |
|
$ |
398,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term
investments |
|
$ |
398,752 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
(773 |
) |
|
$ |
398,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign Debt Securities |
|
$ |
13,282,207 |
|
|
$ |
98,958 |
|
|
$ |
(233,926 |
) |
|
$ |
13,147,239 |
|
Corporate Debt Securities |
|
|
10,987,910 |
|
|
|
110,521 |
|
|
|
(114,675 |
) |
|
|
10,983,756 |
|
Asset Backed Securities |
|
|
14,107,501 |
|
|
|
439,239 |
|
|
|
(227,637 |
) |
|
|
14,319,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term
investments |
|
$ |
38,377,618 |
|
|
$ |
648,718 |
|
|
$ |
(576,238 |
) |
|
$ |
38,450,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
38,776,370 |
|
|
$ |
648,744 |
|
|
$ |
(577,011 |
) |
|
$ |
38,848,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unrealized losses from securities are primarily attributable to market price
movements. Management does not believe any remaining unrealized losses represent
other-than-temporary impairments based on our evaluation of available evidence including
the credit rating of the investments, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Asset backed securities have investment grade credit ratings. These investments are
collateralized by real estate and they are guaranteed by the U.S. Federal Government. |
23
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
6. |
|
Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities (Continued) |
As of June 30, 2011, the estimated fair values of short-term and long-term investments
classified by its contractual maturities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less |
|
$ |
1,571,100 |
|
One year to two years |
|
|
8,834,616 |
|
Two years to three years |
|
|
2,314,297 |
|
Three years to four years |
|
|
4,962,506 |
|
Four years to five years |
|
|
3,322,803 |
|
More than five years |
|
|
30,766,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
51,772,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
Compensation Plan for Outside Directors |
The Company compensated its outside directors through the payment of cash fees and, from time
to time, through the issuance of equity awards.
On June 10, 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,305 shares of common stock and 8,350
restricted shares of common stock (the Restricted Shares) to our outside directors. The
Restricted Shares vested in full in June 2010. Restricted Shares awarded to employees and
directors are measured at their fair market value using the grant-date price of the Companys
shares. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized
$16,492 and $37,696, respectively, of compensation expense related to these awards, which are
included in operating expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of income.
The total accrued compensation cost for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 in
cash and equity awards amounts to $194,218 and $78,682, respectively which were
included in operating expenses. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the
Company recognized $323,353 and $147,229 respectively, which amounts are included in
operating expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of income.
8. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
Litigation and Other Legal Matters
The Company is subject to certain contingent liabilities with respect to existing or potential
claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. The Company accrues liabilities when it considers
probable that future costs will be incurred and such costs can be reasonably estimated. The
proceeding-related reserve is based on developments to date and historical information related
to actions filed against the Company. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had established reserves
for proceeding-related contingencies of $2,141,346 to cover legal actions against the Company.
In addition, as of June 30, 2011 the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain legal
actions considered by the Companys management and its legal counsels to be reasonably possible
for an aggregate amount up to $4,447,838.
24
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
8. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
Litigation and Other Legal Matters (Continued)
No loss amount has been accrued for such possible legal actions of which most significant
(individually or in the aggregate) are described below.
As of June 30, 2011, 348 legal actions were pending in the Brazilian ordinary courts, 8 of
which were related to alleged intellectual property infringement. In addition, as of June 30,
2011, there were more than 1,719 cases still pending in Brazilian consumer courts. Filing and
pursuing of an action before Brazilian consumer courts do not require the assistance of a
lawyer. In most of the cases filed against the Company, the plaintiffs asserted that the
Company was responsible for fraud committed against them, or responsible for damages suffered
when purchasing an item on the Companys website, when using MercadoPago, or when the Company
invoiced them.
On March 17, 2006, Vintage Denim Ltda., or Vintage, sued the Companys Brazilian subsidiaries
MercadoLivre.com Atividades de Internet Ltda. and eBazar.com.br Ltda. in the 29th Civil Court
of the County of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Vintage requested a preliminary
injunction alleging that these subsidiaries were infringing Diesel trademarks and their right
of exclusive distribution as a result of sellers listing allegedly counterfeit and original
imported Diesel branded clothing through the Brazilian page of the Companys website, based on
Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law 9,279/96). Vintage sought an order enjoining the sale of
Diesel-branded clothing on the Companys platform. A preliminary injunction was granted on
April 11, 2006 to prohibit the offer of Diesel-branded products, and a fine for non-compliance
was imposed in the approximate amount of $5,300 per defendant per day of non-compliance. The
Company appealed that fine and obtained its suspension in 2006. Because the appeal of the
preliminary injunction failed, in March of 2007, Vintage presented petitions alleging the
Companys non-compliance with the preliminary injunction granted to Vintage and requested a
fine of approximately $3.3 million against the Companys subsidiaries, which represents
approximately $5,300 per defendant per day of alleged non-compliance since April 2006. In July
2007, the judge ordered the payment of the fine mandated in the preliminary injunction, without
specifying the amount. In September 2007, the judge decided that (i) the Brazilian subsidiaries
were not responsible for alleged infringement of intellectual property rights by its users; and
that (ii) the plaintiffs did not prove the alleged infringement of its intellectual property
rights. However, the decision maintained the injunction until such ruling is non-appealable.
The plaintiff appealed the judges ruling regarding the subsidiarys non-responsibility and the
Company appealed the decision that maintained the preliminary
injunction. On July 26, 2011, the State of Appeals of the State
of São Paulo confirmed the judges ruling regarding our
subsidiarys non-responsibility. The decision on the appeal
regarding the decision that maintained the preliminary injunction is
still pending. In the opinion of the Companys legal counsel, as
of June 30, 2011, the probable loss amounts to
$270,642 and a remaining amount of $1,907,309 was not reserved since it was considered
reasonably possible but not probable.
State of São Paulo Fraud Claim
On June 12, 2007, a state prosecutor of the State of São Paulo, Brazil presented a claim
against the Brazilian subsidiary. The state prosecutor alleges that the Brazilian subsidiary
25
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
8. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
Litigation and Other Legal Matters (Continued)
State of São Paulo Fraud Claim (Continued)
should be held liable for any fraud committed by sellers on the Brazilian version of the
Companys website, or responsible for damages suffered by buyers when purchasing an item on the
Brazilian version of the MercadoLibre website. On June 26, 2009, the Lower Court Judge ruled in
favor of the State of São Paulo prosecutor, declaring that the Brazilian subsidiary shall be
held joint and severally liable for fraud committed by sellers and damages suffered by buyers
when using the website, and ordering the Brazilian subsidiary to remove from the Terms of
Service of the Brazilian website any provision limiting the Companys responsibility, with a
penalty of approximately $2,500 per day of non-compliance. On June 29, 2009 the Company
presented a recourse to the lower court, which was not granted. On September 29, 2009 the
Company presented an appeal and requested to suspend the effects of the ruling issued by the
lower court until the appeal is decided by State Court of Appeals, which request was granted on
December, 1, 2009. The decision on the appeal is still pending. In the opinion of the Companys
management and its legal counsel the risk of loss is reasonably possible.
City of São Paulo Tax Claim
In 2007 São Paulo tax authorities have asserted taxes and fines against our Brazilian
subsidiary relating to the period from 2005 to 2007 in an approximate amount of $5.9 million
according to the exchange rate at that moment. In 2007 the Company presented administrative
defenses against the authorities claim and the tax authorities ruled against the Brazilian
subsidiary. In 2009 the Company presented an appeal to the Conselho Municipal de Tributos or
São Paulo Municipal Council of Taxes which reduced the fine. On February 11, 2011, the Company
appealed this decision to the Câmaras Reunidas do Egrégio Conselho Municipal de Tributos or
Superior Chamber of the São Paulo Municipal Council of Taxes which maintained the reduction of
the Infraction. As of the date of these financial statements, the total amount of the claim is
approximately $5.8 million including surcharges and interest. With this decision the
administrative stage is finished, therefore the Company will contest the tax and the fine in
the justice. The Company ´s management and its legal advisors believe that the risk of loss is
remote, and as a result, has not reserved any provisions for this claim.
State of São Paulo Customer Service Level Claim
On September 1, 2010, a state prosecutor of the State of São Paulo, Brazil presented a claim
against the Companys Brazilian subsidiary. The state prosecutor alleges that the Brazilian
subsidiary should improve our customer service level and provide (among other things) a
telephone number for customer support. On November 17, 2010, the Judge of the first instance
court granted an injunction against the Brazilian subsidiary imposing the obligation to provide
customer service over telephone means
26
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
8. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
Litigation and Other Legal Matters (Continued)
State of São Paulo Customer Service Level Claim (Continued)
within
60 days with a penalty of approximately $65,000 per day of non-compliance. On April 08, 2011, the Company was summoned of
the lawsuit and the injunction. On April 14, 2011, the Company presented recourse to the lower
court; even though, the injunction was not lifted, an extension of 30 days was granted, and the
non-compliance fine would start running as of July 11, 2011. On April 20, 2011 the Company
presented an appeal and requested to suspend the effects of the injunction issued by the lower
court until the appeal is decided by State Court of Appeals which was granted on May 4, 2011.
In the opinion of the Companys management and its legal counsel the risk associated with this
claim is approximately $384,000 which considered reasonably possible.
State of Rio de Janeiro Fraud Claim
On April 15, 2011, a state prosecutor of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil presented a claim
against the Brazilian subsidiary. The state prosecutor requests several clauses of the Terms of
Service of the Website shall be considered null and void. The prosecutor alleges that the
Brazilian subsidiary should be held liable for any fraud committed by sellers on the Brazilian
version of the Companys website, or responsible for damages suffered by buyers when purchasing
an item on the Brazilian version of the MercadoLibre website. On May 5, 2011, the Lower Court
Judge granted an injunction in favor of the State of Rio de Janeiro prosecutor, declaring that
several clauses in the Terms of Service of the Website that limit the responsibility of the
Brazilian subsidiary shall be considered null and void and ordered the Brazilian subsidiary to
remove them, with a penalty of approximately $640 per day of non-compliance. On July 8, 2011
the Company presented a recourse to the lower court requesting a suspension of the effects of
the injunction. On July 13, 2011 the lower Court Judge suspended the injunction and set a
hearing on July 20, 2011, however no settlement was reached by
the parties on the hearing. The Company presented its defense on
July 25, 2011. In
the opinion of the Companys management and its legal counsel the risk of loss is possible.
Other third parties have from time to time claimed, and others may claim in the future, that
the Company was responsible for fraud committed against them, or that the Company has infringed
their intellectual property rights. The underlying laws with respect to the potential liability
of online intermediaries like the Company are unclear in the jurisdictions where the Company
operates. Management believes that additional lawsuits alleging that the Company has violated
copyright or trademark laws will be filed against the Company in the future.
Intellectual property and regulatory claims, whether meritorious or not, are time consuming and
costly to resolve, require significant amounts of management time, could require expensive
changes in the Companys methods of doing business, or could require the Company to enter into
costly royalty or licensing agreements. The Company may be subject to patent disputes, and be
subject to patent infringement claims as the Companys services
expand in scope and complexity. In particular, the Company may face additional patent
infringement claims involving various aspects of the Payments businesses.
27
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
8. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
Litigation and Other Legal Matters (Continued)
State of Rio de Janeiro Fraud Claim (Continued)
From time to time, the Company is involved in other disputes or regulatory inquiries that arise
in the ordinary course of business. The number and significance of these disputes and inquiries
are increasing as the Companys business expands and the Company grows larger.
9. |
|
Long Term Retention Plan |
On August 8, 2008, the Board of Directors approved an employee retention program that will be
payable 50% in cash and 50% in shares, in addition to the annual salary and bonus of certain
executives. Payments will be made in the first quarter on annual basis according to the
following vesting schedule:
|
|
|
Year 1 (2008): 17% |
|
|
|
|
Year 2 (2009): 22% |
|
|
|
|
Year 3 (2010): 27% |
|
|
|
|
Year 4 (2011): 34% |
The shares granted for the 2008 LTRP were valued at the grant-date fair market value PF $36.8
per share. As of June 30, 2011, the Company paid the 66% related to the years one to three of
the 2008 LTRP.
As a consequence of the departure of the Chief Financial Officer, for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2011, the related accrued compensation was a gain of $27,435 corresponding
$6,716 to the share portion of the award credited to Additional Paid-in Capital and $20,718 to
the cash portion included in the Balance Sheet as Payroll and social security payable. For the
six-month period ended June 30, 2011, the related accrued compensation expense was $42.383
corresponding $26,993 to the share portion of the award credited to Additional Paid-in Capital
and $15,390 to the cash portion included in the Balance Sheet as Payroll and social security
payable.
For the three-month period ended June 30, 2010, the related accrued compensation expense was
$54,109 corresponding $29,636 to the share portion of the award credited to Additional Paid-in
Capital and $24,473 to the cash portion included in the Balance Sheet as Payroll and social
security payable.
28
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
9. |
|
Long Term Retention Plan (Continued) |
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, the related accrued compensation expenses was
$135,620 corresponding $64,012 to the share portion of the award credited to Additional Paid-in
Capital and $71,608 to the cash portion included in the Balance Sheet as Social security
payable.
On June 15, 2009, June 25, 2010 and August 1, 2011, the Board of Directors, upon the
recommendation of the compensation Committee approved the 2009, the 2010 and the 2011 employee
retention programs (the 2009, 2010 and 2011 LTRP). The 2011 LTRP was approved by the
Compensation Committee on June 27, 2011. The awards under the 2009, 2010 and 2011 LTRP are
fully payable in cash in addition to the annual salary and bonus of each employee.
The 2009, 2010 and 2011 LTRP will be paid in 8 equal annual quotas (12.5% each) commencing on
March 31, 2010, March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, respectively. Each quota is calculated as
follows:
|
|
|
6.25% of the amount is calculated in nominal terms (the nominal basis share), |
|
|
|
|
6.25% is adjusted by multiplying the nominal amount by the average closing stock
price for the last 60 trading days of the year previous to the payment date and
divided by the average closing stock price for the last 60 trading days of 2008, 2009
and 2010 for the 2009, 2010 and 2011 LTRP, respectively. The average closing stock
price for the 2009, 2010 and 2011 LTRP amounted to $13.81, $45.75 and $65.41,
respectively (the variable share). |
The 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 LTRP have performance and/or eligibility conditions to be
achieved at each year end and also require the employee to stay in the Company at the payment
date.
The 2008 LTRP compensation cost and the variable share compensation cost of the 2009, 2010 and
2011 LTRP are recognized in accordance with the graded-vesting attribution method and are
accrued up to each payment date. The 2009, 2010 and 2011 LTRP nominal basis share are
recognized in straight line bases using the equal annual accrual method.
The following tables summarize the LTRP accrued compensation expense for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTRP 2009 |
|
$ |
490,139 |
|
|
$ |
449,350 |
|
|
$ |
1,009,225 |
|
|
$ |
709,040 |
|
LTRP 2010 |
|
|
309,495 |
|
|
|
350,670 |
|
|
|
817,471 |
|
|
|
659,991 |
|
LTRP 2011 |
|
|
430,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
29
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
10. |
|
Cash dividend distribution |
On July 15, 2011, the Company paid the second quarterly cash dividend distribution of $3.5
million or $0.08 per share, which was approved on May 2, 2011 by the Board of Directors.
* * * *
30
|
|
|
Item 2 |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements regarding our future performance made or implied in this report are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words
anticipate, believe, expect, intend, plan, estimate, target, project,
should, may, could, will and similar words and expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally relate to information
concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies,
financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities,
the effects of future regulation and the effects of competition. Such forward-looking
statements reflect, among other things, our current expectations, plans, projections and
strategies, anticipated financial results, future events and financial trends affecting our
business, all of which are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
important factors (in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this report) that may cause
our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things:
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the continued growth of online commerce and Internet usage in Latin America; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to expand our operations and adapt to rapidly changing technologies; |
|
|
|
|
government regulation; |
|
|
|
|
litigation and legal liability; |
|
|
|
|
systems interruptions or failures; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; |
|
|
|
|
consumer trends; |
|
|
|
|
security breaches and illegal uses of our services; |
|
|
|
|
competition; |
|
|
|
|
reliance on third-party service providers; |
|
|
|
|
enforcement of intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract new customers, retain existing customers and increase revenues; |
|
|
|
|
seasonal fluctuations; and |
|
|
|
|
political, social and economic conditions in Latin America in general,
and Venezuela and Argentina in particular, including Venezuelas
status as a highly inflationary economy and new exchange rate system. |
Many of these risks are beyond our ability to control or predict. New risk factors
emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk
factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our companys business or
the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.
These statements are based on currently available information and our current assumptions,
expectations and projections about future events. While we believe that our assumptions,
expectations and projections are reasonable in view of the currently available information,
you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance. They are subject to future events,
risks and uncertainties many of which are beyond our control as well as potentially
inaccurate assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from our
expectations and projections. Some of
the material risks and uncertainties (in addition to those referred to above and elsewhere
in this report) that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations
and projections are described in Item 1A Risk Factors in Part I of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 25, 2011.
31
You should read that information in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in
Item 2 of Part I of this report and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and related notes in Item 1 of Part I of this report. We note such information
for investors as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. There
also may be other factors that we cannot anticipate or that are not described in this
report, generally because we do not perceive them to be material that could cause results to
differ materially from our expectations.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake
to update these forward-looking statements except as may be required by law. You are
advised, however, to review any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our
periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations has been
organized to present the following:
|
|
|
a brief overview of our company; |
|
|
|
|
a discussion of our principal trends and results of operations for the quarters and six-month periods ended June
30, 2011 and 2010; |
|
|
|
|
a review of our financial presentation and accounting policies, including our critical accounting policies; |
|
|
|
|
a discussion of the principal factors that influence our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity; |
|
|
|
|
a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources, a discussion of our capital expenditures and a description
of our contractual obligations; and |
|
|
|
|
a discussion of the market risks that we face. |
Business Overview
MercadoLibre, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries us, we, our or the company)
hosts the largest online commerce platform in Latin America located at
www.mercadolibre.com, which is focused on enabling e-commerce and its related
services. Our services are designed to provide our users with mechanisms for buying,
selling, paying, collecting, generating leads and comparing transactions via e-commerce in
an effective and efficient manner. We are market leaders in e-commerce in each of Argentina,
Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela, based on
unique visitors and page views. Additionally, we also operate online commerce platforms in
the Dominican Republic, Panama and Portugal.
Through our online commerce platform, we provide buyers and sellers with a robust
online commerce environment that fosters the development of a large and growing e-commerce
community in Latin America, a region with a population of over 550 million people and one of
the fastest-growing Internet penetration rates in the world. We believe that we offer a
technological and commercial solution that addresses the distinctive cultural and geographic
challenges of operating an online commerce platform in Latin America.
We offer our users an eco-system of four related e-commerce services: the MercadoLibre
Marketplace, the MercadoPago payments solution, the MercadoClics advertising program and the
MercadoShops on-line stores solution.
The MercadoLibre Marketplace, which we sometimes refer to as our marketplace, is a
fully-automated, topically-arranged and user-friendly online commerce service. This service
permits both businesses and individuals to list items and conduct their sales and purchases
online in either a fixed-price or auction-based format. Additionally, through online
classified listings, our registered users can list and purchase motor vehicles, vessels,
aircraft, real estate and services. Any Internet user can browse through the various
products and services that are listed on our web site and register with MercadoLibre to
list, bid for and purchase items and services.
To complement the MercadoLibre Marketplace, we developed MercadoPago, an integrated
online payments solution. MercadoPago is designed to facilitate transactions both on and off
the MercadoLibre Marketplace by providing a mechanism that allows our users to securely,
easily and promptly send, receive and finance payments online.
As a further enhancement to the MercadoLibre Marketplace, in 2009, we launched our
MercadoClics program to allow businesses to promote their products and services on the
Internet. Through MercadoClics users and advertisers are able to place display and/or text
advertisements on our web pages in order to promote their brands and offerings. MercadoClics
offers advertisers a cost efficient and automated platform through which it will acquire
traffic. Advertisers purchase, on a cost per clicks basis, advertising
space that appear alongside product search results for specific categories and other
pages. These advertising placements are clearly differentiated from product search results
and direct traffic both to and off our platform based on the advertisers destination of
choice.
32
To close out our suite of e-commerce services we launched, during 2010, the
MercadoShops on-line stores solution. Through MercadoShops users can set-up, manage and
promote their own on-line webstores. These webstores are hosted by MercadoLibre and offer
integration with the other marketplace, payments and advertising services we offer. Users
can choose from a basic, free webstore or pay monthly subscriptions for enhanced
functionality and added services on their stores.
Reporting Segments
Our segment reporting is based on geographic areas, which is the current criteria we are
using to evaluate our segment performance. Our geography segments include Brazil, Argentina,
Mexico, Venezuela and other countries (such as Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican
Republic, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, Portugal and Uruguay).
In addition, we operate a real estate classifieds platform that covers some areas of Florida
in the United States, the operations of which are included in our segment for other
countries.
Recent Developments
2011 Long Term Retention Plan
On June 27, 2011, our Compensation Committee approved the 2011 Long Term Retention Plan
(the 2011 LTRP) which was adopted by our board of directors on August 1, 2011. If
earned, payments to eligible employees under the 2011 LTRP will be in addition to
payments of base salary and cash bonus, the latter if earned, made to these employees.
In order to receive an award under the 2011 LTRP, each eligible employee must satisfy the
performance conditions established by the board of directors for him or her. If these
conditions are satisfied, the eligible employee will, subject to his or her continued
employment as of each applicable payment date, receive the full amount of his 2011 LTRP
bonus, payable as follows:
|
|
|
the eligible employee will receive a fixed cash payment
equal to 6.25% of his or her 2011 LTRP bonus once a year
for a period of eight years starting in 2012 (the Annual
Fixed Payment); and |
|
|
|
|
on each date we pay the Annual Fixed Payment to an eligible
employee, he or she will also receive a cash payment (the
Variable Payment) equal to the product of (i) 6.25% of
the applicable 2011 LTRP bonus and (ii) the quotient of (a)
divided by (b), where (a), the numerator, equals the
Applicable Year Stock Price (as defined below) and (b), the
denominator, equals the 2010 Stock Price, defined as
$65.41, which was the average closing price of our common
stock on the NASDAQ Global Market during the final 60
trading days of 2010. The Applicable Year Stock Price
shall equal the average closing price of our common stock
on the NASDAQ Global Market during the final 60 trading
days of the year preceding the applicable payment date. |
The compensation cost related to the Annual Fixed Payments is recognized on a straight
line basis using the equal annual accrual method. The compensation cost related to the
Variable Payments is recognized in accordance with the graded-vesting attribution method
and is accrued up to each payment day.
As of June 30, 2011, the total compensation cost of the 2011 LTRP is expected to be
approximately $6.1 million and the related accrued compensation expense for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2011 was $0.8 million.
Acquisition of office space in Venezuela
On June 2, 2011, MercadoLibre Venezuela S.A. a subsidiary of MercadoLibre, Inc. (the
Company) entered into an agreement with Inversiones 1182450, C.A. to acquire an office
property of 992 square meters in a building named Torre La Castellana, located in Avenida
Eugenio Mendoza, La Castellana, Municipality of Chacao, State of Miranda, Caracas,
Venezuela for approximately $6.6 million. The Company funded the purchase price with its
own funds and closed on the acquisition on June 2, 2011.
Description of line items
Net revenues
We recognize revenues in each of our five reporting segments. Our reporting segments include
our operations in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Venezuela and other countries (Chile, Colombia,
Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, Portugal and Uruguay).
33
We offer three types of up-front fees for three different combinations of placement and
features. Up-front fees are charged at the time the listing is uploaded onto our platform
and are not subject to successful sale of the items listed. Following this fee structure
modification, revenues for the MercadoLibre Marketplace transacctions are now generated by:
|
|
|
up front fees; |
|
|
|
|
final value fees; and |
|
|
|
|
online advertising fees. |
Since the third quarter of 2010, we have offered payment processing through our MercadoPago
solution at no added cost in Brazil and Argentina. On April 15, 2011, we launched a new and
improved version of our MercadoPago payments platform that may be used for all our
marketplace transactions in México. We also made offering MercadoPago obligatory in our
Mexican marketplace listings (with the exception of free listings). This change in pricing
implies that for Marketplace transactions we no longer charge our users a specific fee for
processing on-platform payments as we did in the past. We do continue, however, to generate
payment related revenues, reported within each of our reporting segments, attributable to:
|
|
|
commissions charged to sellers for the use of the
MercadoPago platform with respect to transactions that
occur outside of our Marketplace platform; |
|
|
|
|
revenues from a financial charge when a buyer elects to pay
in installments through our MercadoPago platform, for both
transactions that occurs on or off our Marketplace
platform. |
The following table sets forth the percentage of consolidated net revenues by segment
for the three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, (*) |
|
|
June 30, (*) |
|
(% of total consolidated net revenues) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
57.1 |
% |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
57.6 |
% |
|
|
58.6 |
% |
Argentina |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
Venezuela |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Other Countries |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts
that appear in the table. |
The table above may not total due to rounding.
The following table summarizes the changes in net revenues for the three-and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
to 2011(*) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
to 2011(*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
% |
Argentina |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Venezuela |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
Other Countries |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues |
|
$ |
130.8 |
|
|
$ |
98.4 |
|
|
$ |
32.4 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
$ |
69.4 |
|
|
$ |
52.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. |
|
|
|
The table above may not total due to rounding. |
We have a highly fragmented customer revenue base given the large numbers of sellers and
buyers who use our platforms. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, no single customer accounted for more than 1.0% of our net revenues. Our MercadoLibre
Marketplace is available in thirteen countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa
Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Portugal, Uruguay and Venezuela),
and MercadoPago is available in six countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico
and Venezuela). The functional currency for each countrys operations is the local currency,
except for Venezuela whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar due to Venezuelas status
as a highly inflationary economy. See Critical accounting policies and estimates Foreign
Currency Translation included in this report. Therefore, our net revenues are generated in
multiple foreign currencies and then translated into U.S. dollars at the average monthly
exchange rate.
34
Our subsidiaries in Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela and Colombia are subject to certain
taxes on revenues which are classified as a cost of net revenues. These taxes represented
7.6% and 7.5% of net revenues for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011.
Cost of net revenues
Cost of net revenues primarily represents bank and credit card processing charges for
transactions and fees paid with credit cards and other payment methods, certain taxes on
revenues, compensation for customer support personnel, ISP connectivity charges,
depreciation and amortization and hosting and site operation fees.
Product and technology development expenses
Our product and technology development related expenses consist primarily of depreciation
and amortization costs related to product and technology development, compensation for our
engineering and web-development staff, telecommunications costs and payments to third-party
suppliers who provide technology maintenance services to our company.
Sales and marketing expenses
Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of marketing costs for our platforms
through online and offline advertising, bad debt charges, the salaries of employees involved
in these activities, public relations costs, marketing activities for our users and
depreciation and amortization costs.
We carry out the vast majority of our marketing efforts on the Internet. In that context, we
enter in agreements with portals, search engines, social networks, ad networks and other
sites in order to attract Internet users to the MercadoLibre Marketplace and convert them
into confirmed registered users and active traders on our platform. Additionally, we
allocate a portion of our marketing budget to cable television advertising in order to
improve our brand awareness and to complement our online efforts.
We also work intensively on attracting, developing and growing our seller community through
our supply efforts. We have dedicated professionals in most of our operations that work with
sellers, through trade show participation, seminars and meetings to provide them with
important tools and skills to become effective sellers on our platform.
General and administrative expenses
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries for management and
administrative staff, compensation for outside directors, long term retention plan
compensation, expenses for legal, accounting and other professional services, insurance
expenses, office space rental expenses, travel and business expenses, as well as
depreciation and amortization costs. General and administrative expenses include the costs
of the following areas of our company: general management, finance, administration,
accounting, legal and human resources.
Other income (expenses)
Other income (expenses) consists of interest income derived primarily from our investments
and cash equivalents, foreign currency gains or losses, and other non-operating results.
Prior to the third quarter of 2010, other income (expenses) included mainly interest expense
related to the working capital requirements for our MercadoPago operations. Since the third
quarter of 2010 and for as long as we continue pre-selling credit card receivables there has
been, and we expect in the future will be, no interest expense included in other income
(expenses) line, related to MercadoPagos working capital requirements.
Income and asset tax
We are subject to federal and state taxes in the United States, as well as foreign taxes in
the multiple jurisdictions where we operate. Our tax obligations consist of current and
deferred income taxes and asset taxes incurred in these jurisdictions. We account for income
taxes following the liability method of accounting. Therefore, our income tax expense
consists of taxes currently payable, if any (given that in certain jurisdictions we still
have net operating loss carry-forwards), plus the change during the period in our deferred
tax assets and liabilities.
Critical accounting policies and estimates
The preparation of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related
notes requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect our reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. We have based our estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our management has discussed
the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with our audit committee and
board of directors. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
35
An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to
be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the
estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or
changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could
materially impact our condensed consolidated financial statements. We believe that the
following critical accounting policies reflect the more significant estimates and
assumptions used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements. You
should read the following descriptions of critical accounting policies, judgments and
estimates in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the
notes there to and other disclosures included in this report.
Foreign Currency Translation
Historically, all of our foreign operations have used the local currency as their functional
currency. Accordingly, these foreign subsidiaries translate assets and liabilities from
their local currencies to U.S. dollars using year-end exchange rates while income and
expense accounts are translated at the average rates in effect during the year. The
resulting translation adjustment is recorded as part of other comprehensive income (loss), a
component of shareholders equity. Gains and losses resulting from transactions denominated
in non-functional currencies are recognized in earnings. Net foreign currency exchange
losses or gains are included in the consolidated statements of income under the caption
Foreign currency (loss) / gain.
Until September 30, 2009, our Venezuelan subsidiaries assets, liabilities, income and
expenses were translated at the official exchange rate of 2.15 Bolivares Fuertes per U.S.
dollar.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we began to use the parallel exchange rate rather than the
official exchange rate to translate our Venezuelan financial statements. The following facts
and circumstances have been considered in our analysis of the applicable exchange rate:
|
|
|
At the date we changed the translation exchange rate (and as of the date of this report), we have not
obtained dividends remittances at the official exchange rate (and we have not at the date of this
report), |
|
|
|
|
The industry in which we operate may not influence our ability to access to the official exchange rate, |
|
|
|
|
The Commission for the Administration of Foreign Exchange (CADIVI) volume of approvals of the use of
the Official Rate was down 50% on a year-to-year basis as of July 2009. |
|
|
|
|
CADIVI has not only delayed approvals but also removed many items from priority lists (current
priorities appear to be food and medicine), causing delays in the repatriation of dividends for many
companies. |
Consequently, in the fourth quarter of 2009, we translated our Venezuelan assets,
liabilities, income and expense accounts using the parallel exchange rate.
As of the date of this report the Company did not buy dollars at the CADIVI official rate.
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we have classified our Venezuelan operations as highly
inflationary as of January 1, 2010 and have used the U.S. dollar to be the functional
currency for purposes of our financial statements. Therefore, no translation effect was
accounted for in other comprehensive income since October 1, 2009 related to our Venezuelan
operations.
Until May 13, 2010, the only way by which U.S. dollars could be purchased outside the
official currency market was using an indirect mechanism consisting in the purchase and sale
of securities, including national public debt bonds (DPNs) denominated in Bolivares Fuertes
and bonds issued by the government that were denominated in U.S. dollars. This mechanism for
transactions in certain securities created an indirect parallel foreign currency exchange
market in Venezuela that enabled entities to obtain foreign currency through financial
brokers without going through CADIVI. Although the parallel exchange rate was higher, and
accordingly less beneficial, than the official exchange rate, some entities have used the
parallel market to exchange currency because, as already mentioned, CADIVI used not to
approve in a timely manner the exchange of currency requested by such entities. Until May
13, 2010, our Venezuelan subsidiaries used this mechanism to buy U.S. dollars and
accordingly we used the parallel average exchange rate to re-measure those foreign currency
transactions.
However, on May 14th, 2010, the Venezuelan government enacted reforms to its exchange
regulations and close-down such parallel market by declaring that
foreign-currency-denominated securities issued by Venezuelan entities were included in the
definition of foreign currency, thus making the Venezuelan Central Bank (BCV) the only
institution that could legally authorize the purchase or sale of foreign currency bonds,
thereby excluding non-authorized brokers from the foreign exchange market.
Trading of foreign currencies was re-opened as a regulated market on June 9, 2010 with the
Venezuelan Central Bank as the only institution through which foreign currency-denominated
transactions can be brokered. Under the new system, known as the Foreign Currency Securities
Transactions System (SITME), entities domiciled in Venezuela can buy U.S. dollar
denominated securities only through banks authorized by the BCV to import goods, services
or capital inputs. Additionally, the SITME imposes volume restrictions on an entitys
trading activity, limiting such activity to a maximum equivalent of $50,000 per day, not to
exceed $350,000 in a calendar month. This limitation is non-cumulative, meaning that an
entity cannot carry over unused volume from one month to the next.
36
As a consequence of this new system, commencing on June 9, 2010, we have transitioned from
the parallel exchange rate to the SITME rate and started re-measuring foreign currency
transactions using the SITME rate published by BCV, which was 5.27 Bolivares Fuertes per
U.S. dollar as of June 9, 2010.
For the period beginning on May 14, 2010 and ended on June 8, 2010 (during which there was
no open foreign currency markets), we applied U.S. GAAP guidelines, which state that if
exchangeability between two currencies is temporarily lacking at the transaction date or
balance sheet date, the first subsequent rate at which exchanges could be made shall be
used.
Accordingly, the June 9, 2010 exchange rate published by the Venezuelan Central Bank has
been used to re-measure transactions during the above-mentioned period.
During 2010 and previous years we were able to obtain U.S. dollars using alternative
mechanisms other than the Venezuelan Commission of Foreign Exchange Administration
(CADIVI). These dollars, obtained at a higher exchange rate than the one offered by CADIVI,
and held in balance at U.S. bank accounts of our Venezuelan subsidiaries, were used for
dividend distributions from our Venezuelan subsidiary. As a result, during 2010, lack of
CADIVI approval did not restrict our ability to distribute the full amount of our retained
earnings as dividends related to fiscal years 2008 ($0.8 million), and 2009 ($1.8 million).
In addition, during 2011, our Venezuelan subsidiary distributed dividends of a $4.2 million,
related to earnings for fiscal year 2010, using existing cash balances held in the U.S. bank
accounts of our Venezuelan subsidiaries.
The following table sets forth the assets, liabilities and net assets of our Venezuelan
subsidiaries, before intercompany eliminations, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venezuelan operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
21,299,401 |
|
|
$ |
21,928,340 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
(7,547,390 |
) |
|
|
(8,212,581 |
) |
Net Assets |
|
|
13,752,011 |
|
|
|
13,715,759 |
|
Net assets of our Venezuelan subsidiary amount to approximately 7.0% of our consolidated net
assets, and cash and investments of our Venezuelan subsidiary held in local currency in
Venezuela amount to approximately 2.9% of our consolidated cash and investments.
On June 2, 2011, our Venezuelan subsidiary acquired an office property containing 992 square
meters in a building located in Caracas, Venezuela for approximately $6.6 million. The
Company funded the purchase price with its own funds.
Although, the current mechanisms available to obtain U.S. dollars for dividends
distributions to our subsidiaries outside Venezuela imply increased restrictions, we do not
expect that the current restrictions on purchasing U.S.dollars to have a significant adverse
effect on its business plans with regard to our investment in Venezuela.
Impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill
We review long-lived assets for impairments whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of
assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to
undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are
considered to be impaired on this basis, the impairment loss to be recognized is measured by
the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Goodwill and certain indefinite life trademarks are reviewed at the end of the year for
impairment or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment of goodwill and certain trademarks are
tested at the reporting unit level (considering each segment of the Company as a reporting
unit) by comparing the reporting units carrying amount, including goodwill and certain
trademarks, to the fair value of the reporting unit. The fair values of the reporting units
are estimated using a combination of the income or discounted cash flows approach and the
market approach, which utilizes
comparable companies data. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair
value, goodwill or indefinite useful life intangible assets are considered impaired and a
second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. No impairments
were recognized during the reporting periods and managements assessment of each reporting
units fair value materially exceeds its carrying value.
We believe that the accounting estimate related to impairment of long lived assets and
goodwill is critical since it is highly susceptible to change from period to period because:
(i) it requires management to make assumptions about gross merchandise volume growth, future
interest rates, sales and costs; and (ii) the impact that recognizing an impairment would
have on the assets reported on our balance sheet as well as our net income would be
material. Managements assumptions about future sales and future costs require significant
judgment.
37
Allowances for doubtful accounts and chargebacks
We are exposed to losses due to uncollectible accounts and credits to sellers. Allowances
for these items represent our estimate of future losses based on our historical experience.
The allowance for doubtful accounts and chargebacks is recorded as a charge to sales and
marketing expenses. Historically, our actual losses have been consistent with our charges.
However, future changes in trends could have a material impact on our future consolidated
statements of income and cash flows.
We believe that the accounting estimate related to allowances for doubtful accounts and
chargebacks is a critical accounting estimate because it requires management to make
assumptions about future collections and credit analysis. Our managements assumptions about
future collections require significant judgment.
Legal contingencies
In connection with certain pending litigation and other claims, we have estimated the range
of probable loss and provided for such losses through charges to our condensed consolidated
statement of income. These estimates are based on our assessment of the facts and
circumstances and historical information related to actions filed against the Company at
each balance sheet date and are subject to change based upon new information and future
events.
From time to time, we are involved in disputes that arise in the ordinary course of
business. We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings as described in Legal
Proceedings in Item 1 of Part II of this report, Item 3 of Part I of our annual report on
Form 10-K for our most recently completed fiscal year filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and in Note 8 to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims against us, and we
will defend ourselves accordingly. However, even if successful, our defense could be costly
and could divert managements time. If the plaintiffs were to prevail on certain claims, we
might be forced to pay damages or modify our business practices. Any of these consequences
could materially harm our business and could have a material adverse impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Income taxes
We are required to recognize a provision for income taxes based upon taxable income and
temporary differences between the book and tax bases of our assets and liabilities for each
of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires a calculation of taxes
payable under currently enacted tax laws in each jurisdiction and an analysis of temporary
differences between the book and tax bases of our assets and liabilities, including various
accruals, allowances, depreciation and amortization. The tax effect of these temporary
differences and the estimated tax benefit from our tax net operating losses are reported as
deferred tax assets and liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. We also
assess the likelihood that our net deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable
income. To the extent we believe that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
deferred tax asset will not be realized, we establish a valuation allowance. At June 30,
2011, we had a valuation allowance on certain foreign net operating losses based on our
assessment that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change the allowance in a period, we
reflect the change with a corresponding increase or decrease in our Income/asset tax
expense line in our condensed consolidated statement of income.
Results of operations for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to
three-month period ended June 30, 2010 and the six-month period ended June 30, 2011
compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2010
The selected financial data for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and
2010 have been derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
included in Item 1 of Part I of this report. These statements include all normal recurring
adjustments that management believes are necessary to fairly state our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows. Results of operations for the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the full year ending December 31, 2011 or for any other period.
38
Statement of income data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
2010 (*) |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
2010 (*) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
130.8 |
|
|
$ |
98.4 |
|
|
$ |
69.4 |
|
|
$ |
52.5 |
|
Cost of net revenues |
|
|
(31.3 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
99.6 |
|
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and technology development |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
(28.9 |
) |
|
|
(22.6 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
(58.7 |
) |
|
|
(42.8 |
) |
|
|
(30.9 |
) |
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other financial gains |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Interest expense and other financial charges |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Foreign currency gains / losses |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income / asset tax expense |
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income / asset tax expense |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28.9 |
|
|
$ |
21.3 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Totals may not add due to rounding |
Other Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of confirmed registered users at end of the period 1 |
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
Number of confirmed new registered users during the period 2 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Gross merchandise volume 3 |
|
|
2,021.8 |
|
|
|
1,529.7 |
|
|
|
1,067.8 |
|
|
|
798.1 |
|
Number of items sold 4 |
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Total payment volume 5 |
|
|
541.1 |
|
|
|
271.6 |
|
|
|
295.8 |
|
|
|
147.8 |
|
Total payment transactions 6 |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
- Measure of the cumulative number of users who have registered on the MercadoLibre
Marketplace and confirmed their registration. |
|
2 |
|
- Measure of the number of new users who have registered on the MercadoLibre
Marketplace and confirmed their registration. |
|
3 |
|
- Measure of the total U.S. dollar sum of all transactions completed through the
MercadoLibre Marketplace, excluding motor vehicles, vessels, aircraft and real
estate. |
|
4 |
|
- Measure of the number of items that were sold/purchased through the MercadoLibre
Marketplace. |
|
5 |
|
- Measure of the total U.S. dollar sum of all transactions paid for using MercadoPago. |
|
6 |
|
- Measure of the number of all transactions paid for using MercadoPago. |
39
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues |
|
$ |
130.8 |
|
|
$ |
98.4 |
|
|
$ |
32.4 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
$ |
69.4 |
|
|
$ |
52.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues (*) |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded
amounts that appear in the table. |
The 32.1% growth in net revenues from the second quarter of 2010 to the second quarter of
2011 resulted principally from a 33.8% increase in the gross merchandise volume (GMV)
transacted through our platform from the second quarter of 2010 to the second quarter of
2011. This GMV growth resulted from a 26.3% increase in items sold between those periods and
a positive impact on U.S. dollars figures mainly due to the appreciation of the Brazilian
Real and also since the parallel exchange rate used by our Venezuelan subsidiary in the
first quarter of 2010 was 6.04 Bolivares Fuertes per U.S. dollar as compared to 5.3
Bolivares Fuertes per U.S. dollar for the second quarter of 2011. See Critical accounting
policies and estimates Foreign currency translation for more detail.
The 32.9% growth in net revenues from the first half of 2010 to the first half of 2011
resulted principally from a 32.2% increase in the gross merchandise volume (GMV)
transacted through our platform from the first half of 2010 to the first half of 2011. This
GMV growth resulted from a 28.4% increase in items sold between those periods and a positive
impact on U.S. dollars figures mainly due to the appreciation of the Brazilian Real and also
since the parallel exchange rate used by our Venezuelan subsidiary in the first half of 2010
was 6.28 Bolivares Fuertes per U.S. dollar as compared to 5.3 Bolivares Fuertes per U.S.
dollar for the first half of 2011. See Critical accounting policies and estimates
Foreign currency translation for more detail.
For
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, net revenues also include the net
amount collected from financial institutions as a result of pre-selling installment-related
financing receivables. We entered into these pre-selling agreements with the aim of
substantially eliminating credit risk and optimizing financial cost. For the three- and
six-month period ended June 30, 2011, our net revenues have no financial related expenses.
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, as we had assumed the financial
risk of installment-related financing receivables, our MercadoPago financing revenues had an
associated $3.9 million and $7.3 million of financial expenses, respectively.
Measured in local currencies, net revenues grew 21.6% and 23.5% during the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the same period a year
earlier. The local currency revenue growth was calculated by using the average monthly
exchange rates for each month during 2010 and applying them to the corresponding months in
2011, so as to calculate what our financial results would have been had exchange rates
remained stable from one year to the next.
For the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010, net
revenues decreased slightly due to a reduction in our take rate, which we define as net
revenues as a percentage of gross merchandise volume, from 6.6% for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2010 to 6.5% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011. For the
six-month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010, net revenues
increased slightly due to growth in our take rate, from 6.4% for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2010 to 6.5% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011.
The following table summarizes the changes in net revenues by each reporting segment for the
three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
to 2011 (*) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
to 2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
% |
Argentina |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Venezuela |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
Other Countries |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues |
|
$ |
130.8 |
|
|
$ |
98.4 |
|
|
$ |
32.4 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
$ |
69.4 |
|
|
$ |
52.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. |
|
|
|
The table above may not total due to rounding. |
On a
segment basis, our net revenues for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2011 as compared to the same periods in 2010, increased across all
segments.
40
The following table sets forth our total net revenues and the sequential quarterly growth of
these net revenues for the periods described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
61.5 |
|
|
$ |
69.4 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Percent change from prior quarter |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
|
$ |
52.5 |
|
|
$ |
56.0 |
|
|
$ |
62.3 |
|
Percent change from prior quarter |
|
|
-6 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
|
$ |
50.6 |
|
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
Percent change from prior quarter |
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
-3 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
34.5 |
|
|
$ |
40.3 |
|
|
$ |
33.4 |
|
Percent change from prior quarter |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
-17 |
% |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded
amounts that appear in the table. |
Cost of net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of net revenues |
|
$ |
31.3 |
|
|
$ |
21.3 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
|
48.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues (*) |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded
amounts that appear in the table. |
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, the increase in cost of net
revenues as compared to the same periods of 2010 was primarily attributable to a $1.9
million and $3.4 million increase in collection fees, respectively. The increase in
collection fees, which occurred primarily in Brazil and Argentina, was a result of the
higher penetration of our Payment solution into our Marketplace, which has a higher
collection fee cost. In addition, sales taxes on our net revenues increased by $1.7 million,
or 46.2% and $3.1 million or 47.2%, respectively, for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011, compared to the same periods of 2010 mainly as a consequence of increases in
net revenues. Moreover, during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 as
compared to the same periods in the prior year, expenditures related to our in-house
customer support operations increased by $1.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively,
primarily driven by an increase in compensation costs and recruitment. The increased
compensation costs and recruitment are incurred in order to improve our service and our
initiatives to combat fraud, illegal items and fee evasion. Finally, for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period of the previous year,
bank transfer fees related to MercadoPago, mainly in Brazil, increased by $0.3 million and
$0.4 million, respectively.
Product and technology development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and technology development |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
% |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues (*) |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded
amounts that appear in the table. |
41
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, the growth in product and
technology development expenses as compared to the same periods in 2010 was primarily
attributable to an increase of $0.8 million or a 39.2% and $1.7 million or a 49.0%,
respectively, increase in compensation costs. These additional compensation expenses were
primarily related to the addition of engineers and, to a lesser extent, to increases in
compensation costs, as we continue to invest in top quality talent to develop enhancements
and new features across our platforms. We believe product development is one of our key
competitive advantages and intend to continue to invest in adding engineers to meet the
increasingly sophisticated product expectations of our customer base.
Product and technology development expenses also grew during the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 as a consequence of increased depreciation and amortization
expenses related to product and technology development of $0.3 million, or 39.2% and $0.7
million or 48.8%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010 and increased
maintenance expenses of $0.3 million and $0.6 million compared to the same periods in 2010.
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
28.9 |
|
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues (*) |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded
amounts that appear in the table. |
For the three-month period ended June 30, 2011, the increase in sales and marketing expenses
when compared to the same period in 2010 was primarily attributable to a one-time negative
impact related to certain voided or overdrawn checks that were processed by one of
MercadoPagos payments processors in Brazil, which resulted in a loss of $1.6 million. Other
marketing expenses increased by $0.9 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2011
as compared to the same period of the previous year due to chargebacks related to
MercadoPago mainly in Brazil. In addition, a $0.6 million increase in compensation costs
driven by higher salaries to retain talent, and a $0.5 million increase in bad debt charges
in the 2011 period also contributed to the increase in sales and marketing expenses during
the period. Bad debt charges for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 represented 6.1%
of net revenues versus 7.1% for the same period in 2010. Finally, sales and marketing
expenses related to trust and safety expenses increased by $0.5 million in the second
quarter of 2011 when compared to the same period in 2010, due to the increased use of our
buyer protection program developed to compensate buyers for unfulfilled transactions or
other claims related to the quality of the purchased goods.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, the increase in sales and marketing expenses
when compared to the same period in 2010 was primarily attributable to a one-time negative
impact related to one Brazilian MercadoPago payments processor discussed above, which
resulted in a loss of $1.6 million. Other marketing expenses increased by $1.3 million in
the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period of the previous year
due to chargebacks related to MercadoPago mainly in Brazil. In addition, a $1.4 million
increase in compensation costs driven by higher salaries to retain talent, and a $1.2
million increase in bad debt charges in the 2011 period also contributed to the increase in
sales and marketing expenses during the period. Bad debt charges for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2011 represented 6.3% of net revenues versus 7.2% for the same period in
2010. Finally, sales and marketing expenses related to trust and safety expenses increased
by $1.0 million in the first half of 2011 when compared to the same period in 2010, due to
the increased use of our buyer protection program developed to compensate buyers for
unfulfilled transactions or other claims related to the quality of the purchased goods. The
increase in sales and marketing expenses for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 was
partially offset by a $0.5 million decrease in our online advertising expenses related to
our affiliate program and specific deals, as we have optimized investment allocation over
the same period ended June 30, 2010. Online advertising represented 5.7% and 6.0% of our net
revenues in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, down from
7.6% and 8.4% for the same periods in 2010, respectively.
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
% |
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues (*) |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded
amounts that appear in the table. |
For the three- month period ended June 30, 2011, the increase in general and administrative
expenses as compared to the same period of 2010, was primarily attributable to a $1.3
million increase in compensation costs in the 2011 period related to our long term retention
plans and increases in salaries to retain talent, a $1.0 million increase in outside
services mainly related to legal and tax fees, a $0.3 million increase in office expenses
mainly related to new offices in our main locations and a $0.2 million increase related to
other general and administrative expenses.
42
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, the increase in general and administrative
expenses as compared to the same period of 2010, was primarily attributable to a
$3.1 million, increase in compensation costs in the 2011 period related to our long term
retention plans and increases in salaries to retain talent, a $1.6 million increase in
outside services mainly related to legal and tax fees, a $0.7 million increase in office
expenses mainly related to new offices in our main locations and a $0.5 million increase
related to other general and administrative expenses.
Other income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses) |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
|
-139.1 |
% |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
(2.5 |
) |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
|
-136.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
-4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
-4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded
amounts that appear in the table. |
For the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010, the
decrease in other expenses was primarily a result of: (a) a $2.5 million decrease in
financial expenses resulting from our determination to pre-sell installment-related
financing receivables, which we commenced in the third quarter of 2010; and (b) a
$1.3 million increase in interest income and other financial charges related to higher
interest income earned on our investments driven by a greater volume of investments and
higher interest rates, particularly in Brazil.
The increase in other income (expenses) was partially offset by an increase of $0.7 million
in foreign currency losses. The increase in foreign currency losses for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to losses in Brazil attributable to the impact
of the local currency appreciation on the cash balances held by our Brazilian subsidiaries
in U.S. dollars during the second quarter of 2011 versus a lesser impact in the second
quarter of 2010.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010, the
decrease in other expenses was primarily a result of: (a) a $4.8 million decrease in
financial expenses resulting from our determination to pre-sell installment-related
financing receivables, which we commenced in the third quarter of 2010; and (b) a $2.4
million increase in interest income and other financial charges related to higher interest
income earned on our investments driven by a greater volume of investments and higher
interest rates, particularly in Brazil.
The increase in other income (expenses) was partially offset by an increase of $1.6 million
in foreign currency losses from $0.4 million of foreign currency gains in the first half of
2010 to a $1.2 million of foreign currency losses in the first half of 2011. The increase in
foreign currency losses for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to
losses in Brazil and Mexico attributable to the impact of the local currency appreciation on
the cash balances held by our Brazilian and Mexican subsidiaries in U.S. dollars during the
first half of 2011 versus a devaluation of those local currencies in the first half of 2010.
Income and asset tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and asset tax |
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
% |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues (*) |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded
amounts that appear in the table. |
During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same periods
the previous year, income and asset tax increased $2.9 million and $4.9 million,
respectively, as a consequence of higher taxable income period over period. In addition, our
income and asset tax expense margin was negatively impacted by increases in income tax charge
in Brazil as a consequence of permanent tax differences period over period.
Our blended tax rate is defined as income and asset tax expense as a percentage of income
before income and asset tax. Our effective income tax rate is defined as the provision for
income taxes (net of charges related to dividend distribution from foreign subsidiaries
which are offset with domestic foreign tax credits) as a percentage of pre-tax income. The
effective income tax rate excludes the effects of the deferred income tax, and the Mexican
tax called Impuesto Empresarial a Tasa Única (IETU).
43
The following table summarizes the changes in our blended and effective tax rate for the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blended tax rate |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
|
|
33.4 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
35.8 |
% |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded
amounts that appear in the table. |
Our
blended tax rate increase from the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 to
the same periods in 2011 due to a growth in our Venezuelan taxable income where the income
tax rate is 34% as compared to other locations where we have lower tax rates. In
addition, for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, our Argentine taxable
income has a lower share of the consolidated taxable income when compared to the same periods in 2010, which results in a
higher consolidated tax rate as a consequence that Argentina has a lower tax rate compared to other locations. Our blended
tax rate also grew as a consequence of certain Brazilian non-deductible losses related to
voided and/or overdrawn checks processed by a MercadoPago payments processor as described
in our Sales and Marketing discussion.
Our effective tax rate decreased from the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2010 to the same periods in 2011 due to our Brazilian business reorganization generated
as part of our tax planning strategy, which permitted us to use tax loss carryforwards in
that country and due to a decrease in the Argentine effective tax rate as described
below.
The following table sets forth our effective income tax rate related to our main
locations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
by country |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
Brazil |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
37.2 |
% |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
Mexico |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
38.7 |
% |
Venezuela |
|
|
34.4 |
% |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
The Companys Argentine subsidiary is a beneficiary of a software development law granting it
a relief of 60% of total income tax determined in each year. Mainly for that reason, our
Argentine operations effective income tax rate for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 are currently lower than the local statutory rate of 35%. If we had
not been granted the Argentine tax holiday, our Argentine effective income tax rate would
have been higher but, in that case, we would have pursued an alternative tax planning
strategy.
The decrease in our Argentine operations effective income tax rate period over period is
mainly related to variations in temporary tax differences.
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, our Brazilian effective income tax
rates are lower than the local statutory rate of 34% mainly because of the business
reorganization generated as part of our tax planning strategy, which permitted us to use tax
loss carryforwards in that country. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010,
our Brazilian effective income tax rates are higher than the local statutory rate as a
consequence of variations in both temporary and permanent tax differences.
44
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, our Mexican effective income tax
rates are lower than the local statutory rate of 30% mainly because of variations in permanent
tax differences. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, our Mexican effective income
tax rate is lower than the local statutory rate mainly because of a business reorganization
generated as part of our tax planning strategy, which permitted us to use tax loss
carryforwards in that country (all tax loss carryforwards were used in 2010) and due to
variations in permanent tax differences. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2010, our
Mexican effective income tax rate is higher than the local statutory rate mainly as a
consequence of temporary and permanent tax differences.
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, our Venezuelan effective income tax
rates are higher than the local statutory rate mainly due to losses
related to temporary differences generated by the re-measurement of
our foreign-currency position computed for tax purposes that cannot
be considered for U.S. GAAP purposes (our Venezuelan subsidiaries
functional currency is the U.S. dollar due to a highly inflationary
environment). For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, our
Venezuelan effective income tax rates are lower than the local statutory rate of 34%, mainly as
a consequence of a loss related to the local inflation adjustment that is not recorded for
U.S. GAAP purposes.
Our effective tax rate reflects the tax effect of significant operations outside the United
States, which are generally taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35%,
especially in the case of Argentina, where we have significant operations with a low
effective tax as a consequence of an Argentine tax holiday. A future change in the mix of
pretax income from these various tax jurisdictions would impact the Companys periodic
effective tax rate.
We do not expect to have a significant impact in the domestic effective income tax rate
related to dividend distributions from foreign subsidiaries since our strategy is to reinvest
our cash surplus in our international operations, and to distribute dividends when they can
be offset with available tax credits.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our main cash requirement historically has been working capital to fund MercadoPago
financing operations in Brazil. We also require cash for capital expenditures relating to
technology infrastructure, software applications, office space and to fund the payment of
quarterly cash dividends on shares of our common stock.
Since our inception, we have funded our operations primarily through contributions received
from our stockholders during the first two years of operations, from funds raised during our
initial public offering, and from cash generated from our operations. We have funded
MercadoPago by discounting credit card receivables, with loans backed with credit card
receivables and through cash advances derived from our business.
At June 30, 2011, our principal source of liquidity was $116.6 million of cash and cash
equivalents and short-term investments and $50.2 million of long-term investments provided
by cash generated from operations. We consider our long-term
investments as part of our liquidity because long-term investments
are comprised by available-for-sale securities classified as
long-term as a consequence of their contractual maturities.
The significant components of our working capital are cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, funds receivable
from and payable to MercadoPago users, and short-term debt. As long as we continue
transferring credit card receivables to financial institutions in return for cash, we will
continue generating cash.
As of June 30, 2011, cash and investments of foreign subsidiaries amount to $137.5 million
or 82.4% of our consolidated cash and investments and approximately 51.1% of consolidated
cash and investments are held outside the U.S., mostly in Brazil. Our strategy is to
reinvest our undistributed earnings of our foreign operations in those operations and to
distribute dividends when they can be offset with available tax credits. We do not expect a
material impact in any repatriation of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries on our
operations since the taxable domestic gains generated by any dividend distributions will be
mostly offset with foreign tax credits that arise from income tax paid in our foreign
operations, which we are allowed to compute for domestic income tax purposes.
In the event we change the way we manage our business, the working capital needs could be
funded, as we did in the past, through a combination of the sale of credit card coupons to
financial institutions, loans backed by credit card receivables and cash advances from our
business.
The following table presents our cash flows from operating activities, investing activities
and financing activities for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June, 30 |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
Investment activities |
|
|
(43.3 |
) |
|
|
(41.3 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(12.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash provided by operating activities consists of net income adjusted for certain non-cash
items, and the effect of changes in working capital and other activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash provided by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that
appear in the table. |
The $7.6 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities during the six-month
period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 was mainly attributable to a
$7.6 million increase in net income. Additionally, net cash provided by operating activities
was impacted by a $4.4 million decrease in changes in account receivables in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2011 versus the same period of 2010, a $4.5 million increase in
non-cash losses primarily attributable to long term retention plan compensation expenses,
depreciation and amortization and deferred taxes, and a $2.2 million increase in other
liabilities.
These increases in cash provided by operations were partially offset by a $11.0 million
decrease in changes in account payable.
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash used in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
$ |
(43.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(41.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts
that appear in the table. |
Net cash used in investing activities in the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 resulted
mainly from purchases of investments for $201.0 million. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, the increase
in cash used in investment activities was partially offset by proceeds from the sale and
maturity of $171.1 million of investments as part of our
financial strategy. Additionally, we used $13.4 million
of cash in the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 to make capital expenditures related to
(a) the purchase of a new office in Venezuela for approximately $6.6 million and (b)
technological equipment, software licenses, new office space in Argentina and office
equipment in Brazil, Colombia and Mexico.
As of June 30, 2010, net cash used in investing activities resulted primarily from purchases
of investments for $64.3 million. Additionally, in the six-month period ended June 30, 2010,
we used $3.9 million of cash for capital expenditures related to technological equipment,
software licenses and, to a lesser degree, office equipment. During the six-month period
ended June 30, 2010, the increase in cash used in investment activities was partially offset
by proceeds from the sale and maturity of $26.9 million of investments as part of our
financial strategy.
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Change from 2010 to |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 (*) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
in % |
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash used in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
$ |
(3.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that
appear in the table. |
46
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, our primary use of cash was to fund the $3.5
million quarterly cash dividends paid on April 15, 2011. For the six-month period ended June
30, 2010, our primary use of cash for financing activities was a reduction in short term
debt as we paid $3.0 million of notes outstanding which were issued in connection with the
DeRemate acquisition.
In the event that we decide to pursue strategic acquisitions in the
future, we may fund them with available cash, third party debt financing, or by raising
equity capital, as market conditions allow.
Debt
As of June 30, 2011, the Company recorded $3.5 million of dividends payable to its
stockholders. In addition, as of June 30, 2011, our outstanding debt of $0.2 million is
related to an Argentine car lease contract. See Contractual obligations below for more
information.
Cash Dividends
In June 2011, our board of directors declared our second quarterly cash dividend in our
history of $3.5 million on our outstanding shares of common stock. The dividend was paid on
July 15, 2011 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on June 30, 2011. We
currently expect to continue paying comparable cash dividends on a quarterly basis. However,
any future determination as to the declaration of dividends on our common stock will be made
at the discretion of our board of directors.
Capital expenditures
Our capital expenditures increased by $9.5 million to $13.4 million for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $3.9 million for the same period in 2010, mainly due to
the acquisition of a new office property located in Caracas, Venezuela for approximately
$6.6 million, and due to information technology investments made during the six-month period
ended June 30, 2011. The Company increased the level of investment on hardware and software
licenses necessary to improve and update the technology of our platform, cost of computer
software developed internally and office equipment for new office space in Argentina, Brazil
and Mexico. We anticipate continued investments in capital expenditures related to
information technology in the future as we strive to maintain our position in the Latin
American e-commerce market.
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, including the sale of credit card
receivables and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to fund our operating
activities, property and equipment expenditures and to pay or repay obligations going
forward.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
At June 30, 2011, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably
likely to have, a current or future material effect on our consolidated financial condition,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
Presentation of
Comprehensive Income
On June 16, 2011
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an
amendment to disclosures about the presentation of the comprehensive income in
the financial statements. The new guidance provides two ways to present the
components of the comprehensive income, in either (a) a continuous
statement of comprehensive income, or (b) two separate but consecutive
statements. The amended disclosures about the presentation of the comprehensive
income in the financial statements are effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company
does not expect to have a significant impact on the presentation of the
consolidated financial statements.
Fair value
measurement and disclosure
In May 2011, the
FASB issued new accounting guidance that amends some fair value measurement
principles and it expands the ASC 820 existing disclosure requirements for fair
value measurements. The new guidance states that the concepts of highest and
best use and valuation premise are only relevant when measuring the fair value
of nonfinancial assets and prohibits the grouping of financial instruments for
purposes of determining their fair values when the unit of account is specified
in other guidance. We will adopt this accounting standard upon its effective
date for periods ending on or after December 15, 2011, and do not
anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
Contractual obligations
We have certain fixed contractual obligations and commitments that include future estimated
Payments. Changes in our business needs, cancellation provisions and other factors may
result in actual Payments differing materially from the estimates. We cannot provide
certainty regarding the timing and amount of Payments. Below is a summary of the most
significant assumptions used in our determination of amounts presented in the table.
Contractual obligations at June 30, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1 to 3 |
|
|
3 to 5 |
|
|
More tan |
|
(in millions) |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Capital lease obligations (1) |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating lease obligations (2) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On February 22, 2010, our Argentina subsidiary signed a Company car lease contract to buy
12 cars for certain employees of the Company. The total lease contract amounted to $0.4 million
and matures in July 2013. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes leases of office space. |
We have leases for office space in certain countries in which we operate and leases for
Company cars in Argentina. These are our only operating leases. Purchase obligation amounts
include minimum purchase commitments for advertising, capital expenditures (technological
equipment and software licenses) and other goods and services that were entered into in the
ordinary course of business. We have developed estimates to project payment obligations
based upon historical trends, when available, and our anticipated future obligations. Given
the significance of performance requirements within our advertising and other arrangements,
actual Payments could differ significantly from these estimates.
47
|
|
|
Item 3 |
|
Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk |
We are exposed to market risks arising from our business operations. These market risks
arise mainly from the possibility that changes in interest rates and the U.S. dollar
exchange rate with local currencies, particularly the Brazilian Real due to Brazils share
of our revenues, may affect the value of our financial assets and liabilities.
Foreign currencies
At June 30, 2011, we hold cash and cash equivalents in local currencies in our subsidiaries,
and have receivables denominated in local currencies in all of our operations. Our
subsidiaries generate revenues and incur most of their expenses in local currency. As a
result, our subsidiaries use their local currency as their functional currency, except for
our Venezuelan subsidiaries whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar due to a highly
inflationary environment. At June 30, 2011, the total cash and cash equivalents denominated in
foreign currencies totaled $14.4 million, short-term investments denominated in foreign
currencies totaled $70.8 million and accounts receivable and funds receivable from customers
in foreign currencies totaled $22.7 million. As of June 30, 2011, we have no long-term
investments denominated in foreign currencies. To manage exchange rate risk, our treasury
policy is to transfer most cash and cash equivalents in excess of working capital
requirements into dollar-denominated accounts in the United States. At June 30, 2011, our
dollar-denominated cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $31.4 million
and our dollar-denominated long-term investments totaled $50.2 million. For the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, we incurred foreign currency losses in the amount of
$0.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively, as the cash and investment balances of the
subsidiaries held in U.S. dollars depreciated in local current terms. (See Management
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Results of
operations for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to three-month period
ended June 30, 2010 and the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six-month
period ended June 30, 2010 Other income (expenses) for more information).
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we have transitioned our Venezuelan operations to highly
inflationary status as of January 1, 2010 and have been using the U.S. dollar as the
functional currency for these operations since then. In accordance with U.S. GAAP,
translation adjustments for prior periods were not removed from equity and the translated
amounts for nonmonetary assets at December 31, 2010 become the accounting basis for those
assets. Monetary assets and liabilities in Bolivares Fuertes were re-measured to the U.S.
dollar at the closing parallel exchange rate and the results of the operations in Bolivares
Fuertes were re-measured to the U.S. dollar at the average monthly parallel exchange rate
up to May 13, 2010.
However, on May 14th, 2010, the Venezuelan government enacted reforms to its exchange
regulations and close down the parallel market by declaring that
foreign-currency-denominated securities issued by Venezuelan entities were included in the
definition of foreign currency, thus making the Venezuelan Central Bank (BCV) the only
institution that could legally authorize the purchase or sale of foreign currency bonds,
thereby excluding non-authorized brokers from the foreign exchange market.
Trading of foreign currencies was re-opened as a regulated market on June 9, 2010 with the
Venezuelan Central Bank as the only institution through which foreign currency-denominated
transactions can be brokered. Under the new system, known as the Foreign Currency Securities
Transactions System (SITME), entities domiciled in Venezuela can buy U.S.
dollardenominated securities only through banks authorized by the BCV to import goods,
services or capital inputs. Additionally, the SITME imposes volume restrictions on an
entitys trading activity, limiting such activity to a maximum equivalent of $50,000 per
day, not to exceed $350,000 in a calendar month. This limitation is non-cumulative, meaning
that an entity cannot carry over unused volume from one month to the next.
As a consequence of this new system, commencing on June 9, 2010, we have transitioned from
the parallel exchange rate to the SITME rate and started re-measuring foreign currency
transactions using the SITME rate published by BCV, which was 5.27 Bolivares Fuertes per
U.S. dollar as of June 9, 2010.
For the period beginning on May 14, 2010 and ending on June 8, 2010 (during which there was
no open foreign currency markets) we applied U.S. GAAP guidelines which state that if
exchangeability between two currencies is temporarily lacking at the transaction date or
balance sheet date, the first subsequent rate at which exchanges could be made shall be
used.
Accordingly, the June 9, 2010 exchange rate published by the Venezuelan Central Bank has
been used to re-measure transactions during the above mentioned period.
During 2010 and previous years we were able to obtain U.S. dollars using alternative
mechanisms other than the Venezuelan Commission of Foreign Exchange Administration
(CADIVI). These dollars, obtained at a higher exchange rate than the one offered by CADIVI,
and held in balance at U.S. bank accounts of our Venezuelan subsidiaries, were used for
dividend distributions from our Venezuelan subsidiary. As a result, during 2010, lack of
CADIVI approval did not restrict our ability to distribute the full amount of our retained
earnings as dividends related to fiscal years 2008 ($0.8 million), and 2009 ($1.8 million).
In addition, during 2011, our Venezuelan subsidiary distributed dividends related to earnings
for fiscal year 2010, using existing cash balances held in the U.S. bank accounts for a $4.2
million.
48
Net assets of our Venezuelan subsidiary amount to approximately 7.0% of our consolidated net
assets, and cash and investments of our Venezuelan subsidiary held in local currency in
Venezuela amount only to approximately 2.9% of our consolidated cash and investments.
Although, the current mechanisms available to obtain U.S. dollars for dividends distributions
to shareholders outside Venezuela imply increased restrictions, the Company does not expect
that the current restrictions to purchase dollars have a significant adverse effect on its
business plans with regard to the investment in Venezuela.
If the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the translation of these
foreign-currency-denominated transactions will result in increased net revenues, operating
expenses, and net income while the re-measurement of our net asset position in U.S. dollars
will have a negative impact in our Statement of Income. Similarly, our net revenues,
operating expenses and net income will decrease if the U.S. dollar strengthens against
foreign currencies, while the re-measurement of our net asset position in U.S. dollars will
have a positive impact in our Statement of Income.
The following table sets forth the percentage of consolidated net revenues by segment
for the three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, (*) |
|
|
June 30, (*) |
|
(% of total consolidated net revenues) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
57.1 |
% |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
57.6 |
% |
|
|
58.6 |
% |
Argentina |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
Venezuela |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Other Countries |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded
amounts that appear in the table. |
The table above may not total due to rounding.
The table below shows the impact on our net revenues, expenses, other income and income tax,
net income and shareholders equity for a positive or negative 10% fluctuation on all the
foreign currencies to which we are exposed as of June 30, 2011 and for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2011:
Foreign Currency Sensitivity Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
-10% |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
+10% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
145.3 |
|
|
$ |
130.8 |
|
|
$ |
119.0 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
(99.9 |
) |
|
|
(90.0 |
) |
|
|
(81.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
45.4 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses) and income tax
related to P&L items |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
Foreign Currency impact related to the remeasurement
of our Net Asset position |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
204.1 |
|
|
$ |
197.6 |
|
|
$ |
192.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Appreciation of the subsidiaries local currency against U.S. Dollar |
|
(2) |
|
Depreciation of the subsidiaries local currency against U.S. Dollar |
The table above shows a decrease in our net income when the U.S. dollar weakens against
foreign currencies because the re-measurement of our net asset position in U.S. Dollars has
a greater impact than the increase in net revenues, operating expenses, and other income
(expenses) and income tax lines related to the translation effect. Similarly, the table
above shows an increase in our net income when the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign
currencies because the re-measurement of our net asset position in U.S. Dollars has a
greater impact than the decrease in net revenues, operating expenses, and other income
(expenses) and income tax lines related to the translation effect.
49
In the past we have entered into transactions to hedge portions of our foreign currency
translation exposure but during 2011 we have not entered into any such agreement.
Interest
Our earnings and cash flows are also affected by changes in interest rates. These changes
can have an impact on our interest expenses derived from selling our MercadoPago
receivables. At June 30, 2011, MercadoPagos funds receivable from customers totaled
approximately $7.9 million. Interest fluctuations could also negatively affect certain of
our fixed rate and floating rate investments
comprised primarily of time deposits, money market funds, investment grade corporate debt
securities, and sovereign debt securities. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate
interest earning products carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may
have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while
floating rate securities may produce less income than predicted if interest rates fall.
Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage
exposure to interest rate changes. As of June 30, 2011, the average duration of our
available for sale securities, defined as the approximate percentage change in price for a
100-basis-point change in yield, is 3.49%. If interest rates were to instantaneously
increase (decrease) by 100 basis points, the fair market value of our available for sale
securities as of June 30, 2011 could decrease (increase) by approximately $1.8 million.
Our short-term and long-term investments, which are classified on our balance sheet as
current assets in the amount of $72.4 million and as non-current assets in the amount of
$50.2 million, respectively, can be readily converted at any time into cash or into
securities with a shorter remaining time to maturity. We determine the appropriate
classification of our investments at the time of purchase and re-evaluate such designations
as of each balance sheet date.
Equity Price Risk
Our board of directors adopted the 2009, 2010 and 2011 long-term retention plan (the 2009,
2010 and 2011 LTRP) payable as follows:
|
|
|
eligible employees will receive a fixed cash payment equal
to 6.25% of his or her 2009 and/or 2010 and/or 2011 LTRP
bonus once a year for a period of eight years starting in
2010 and/or 2011 and/or 2012 (the 2009, 2010 and 2011
Annual Fixed Payment); and |
|
|
|
|
on each date we pay the Annual Fixed Payment to an eligible
employee, he or she will also receive a cash payment (the
2009, 2010 and 2011 Variable Payment) equal to the
product of (i) 6.25% of the applicable 2009 and/or 2010
and/or 2011 LTRP bonus and (ii) the quotient of (a) divided
by (b), where (a), the numerator, equals the Applicable
Year Stock Price (as defined below) and (b), the
denominator, equals the 2008, 2009 and 2010 Stock Price,
defined as $13.81, $45.75 and $65.41 for the 2009, 2010 and
2011 LTRP, respectively, which was the average closing
price of the Companys common stock on the NASDAQ Global
Market during the final 60 trading days of 2008, 2009 and
2010, respectively. The Applicable Year Stock Price shall
equal the average closing price of the Companys common
stock on the NASDAQ Global Market during the final 60
trading days of the year preceding the applicable payment
date. |
The 2009, 2010 and 2011 Variable Payment LTRP liability subjects us to equity price risk. At
June 30, 2011, the total contractual obligation fair value of our 2009, 2010 and 2011
Variable Payment LTRP liability amounts to $13.3 million. As of June 30, 2011, the accrued
liability related to the 2009, 2010 and 2011 Variable Payment portion of the LTRP included
in Social security payable in our condensed consolidated balance
sheet amounts to $4.5
million. The following table shows a sensitivity analysis of the risk associated with our
total contractual obligation related to the 2009, 2010 and 2011
Variable Payment if our
stock price were to increases or decreases by up to 40%.
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
MercadoLibre, Inc |
|
|
2009, 2010 and 2011 variable |
|
(In US dollars) |
|
Equity Price |
|
|
payment LTRP liability |
|
Change in equity price in percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40% |
|
|
118.45 |
|
|
|
18,594,357 |
|
30% |
|
|
109.99 |
|
|
|
17,266,189 |
|
20% |
|
|
101.53 |
|
|
|
15,938,021 |
|
10% |
|
|
93.07 |
|
|
|
14,609,852 |
|
Static (*) |
|
|
84.61 |
|
|
|
13,281,684 |
|
-10% |
|
|
76.15 |
|
|
|
11,953,516 |
|
-20% |
|
|
67.69 |
|
|
|
10,625,347 |
|
-30% |
|
|
59.23 |
|
|
|
9,297,179 |
|
-40% |
|
|
50.77 |
|
|
|
7,969,010 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Average closing stock price for the last 60 trading days of the closing date |
|
|
|
Item 4 |
|
Controls and Procedures |
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b),
our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the
end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three-month
period ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1 |
|
Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, we are involved in disputes that arise in the ordinary course of our
business. The number and significance of these disputes is increasing as our business expands
and our company grows. Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, may be time
consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of management time, result
in the diversion of significant operational resources or require expensive implementations of
changes to our business methods to respond to these claims. See Item 1ARisk Factors of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2011, for additional discussion of the
litigation and regulatory risks facing our company.
As of June 30, 2011, our total reserves for proceeding-related contingencies were
approximately $2.1 million to cover legal actions against us in which we have determined that
a loss is probable. The proceeding-related reserve is based on developments to date and
historical information related to actions filed against our company. We do not reserve for
losses we determine to be possible or remote.
As of June 30, 2011, there were 348 lawsuits pending against our Brazilian subsidiary in the
Brazilian ordinary courts. In addition, as of June 30, 2011, there were more than 1,719
lawsuits pending against our Brazilian subsidiary in the Brazilian consumer courts, where no
lawyer is required to file or pursue a claim. In most of these cases, the plaintiffs asserted
that we were responsible for fraud committed against them, or responsible for damages suffered
when purchasing an item on our website, when using MercadoPago, or when we invoiced them. We
believe we have meritorious defenses to these claims and intend to continue defending them.
We have described below material developments that occurred during the quarter ended June 30,
2011 to pending legal proceedings which we have determined may be material to our business, all
of which have been previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have excluded
ordinary routine legal proceedings incidental to our business. In each of these proceedings we
also believe we have meritorious defenses, and intend to continue defending these actions. We
have established a reserve for those proceedings which we have considered that a loss is
probable.
On March 17, 2006, Vintage Denim
Ltda., or Vintage, sued our Brazilian subsidiaries MercadoLivre.com Atividades
de Internet Ltda. and eBazar.com.br Ltda. in the 29th Civil Court of the County
of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Vintage requested a
preliminary injunction alleging that these subsidiaries were infringing Diesel
trademarks and their right of exclusive distribution as a result of sellers
listing allegedly counterfeit and original imported Diesel branded clothing
through the Brazilian page of our website, based on Brazilian Industrial
Property Law (Law 9,279/96). Vintage sought an order enjoining the sale of
Diesel-branded clothing on our platform. A preliminary injunction was granted
on April 11, 2006 to prohibit the offer of Diesel-branded products, and a
fine for non-compliance was imposed in the approximate amount of $5,300 per
defendant per day of non-compliance. We appealed that fine and obtained its
suspension in 2006. Because our appeal of the preliminary injunction failed, in
March of 2007, Vintage presented petitions alleging our non-compliance with the
preliminary injunction granted to Vintage and requested a fine of approximately
$3.3 million against us, which represents approximately $5,300 per
defendant per day of alleged non-compliance since April 2006. In
July 2007, the judge ordered the payment of the fine mandated in the
preliminary injunction, without specifying the amount. When we were officially
notified of the amount of the fine, we intend to present a new appeal against
the application of the fine. In September 2007, the judge decided that
(i) our Brazilian subsidiaries were not responsible for alleged
infringement of intellectual property rights by its users; and that (ii) the
plaintiffs did not prove the alleged infringement of its intellectual property
rights. However, the decision maintained the injunction until such ruling is
non-appealable. On July 26, 2011 the State Court of Appeals of the State
of São Paulo confirmed the judge’s ruling regarding our
subsidiary’s non-responsibility. The decision on the appeal regarding the
decision that maintained the preliminary injunction is still pending.
51
City of São Paulo Tax Claim
On September 13, 2007, the Company paid to tax authorities in São Paulo, Brazil approximately
$1.1 million, consisting of $1.0 million in accrued taxes and $0.1 million in fines, related
to its Brazilian subsidiarys activities in São Paulo for the period 2002 through 2004. The
Company had reserved approximately $1.1 million against these taxes as of December 31, 2006 so
no additional provision was recorded for the payment. São Paulo tax authorities have also
asserted taxes and fines against us relating to the period from 2005 to 2007 in an approximate
additional amount of $5.9 million according to the exchange rate at that time. In January
2005, the Brazilian subsidiary had moved its operations to Santana de Parnaíba City, Brazil
and began paying taxes to that jurisdiction, therefore the Company believes it has strong
defenses to the claims of the São Paulo authorities with respect to this period. On August 31,
2007, the Company presented administrative defenses against the authorities claim. On
September, 12, 2009 the tax authorities ruled against the Brazilian subsidiary. On October 13,
2009, the Company presented an appeal to the Conselho Municipal de Tributos or São Paulo
Municipal Council of Taxes which reduced the fine. On February 11, 2011 the Company appealed
this decision to the Câmaras Reunidas do Egrégio Conselho Municipal de Tributos (Superior
Chamber of the São Paulo Municipal Council of Taxes) which maintained the reduction of the
infraction to approximately $5.8 million including surcharges and interest. With this decision
the administrative stage is finished, therefore the Company will contest the tax and the fine
in the justice. As of the date of this report, the Company believes the risk of loss is
remote, and as a result, has not established a reserve against this claim.
State of São Paulo Customer Service Level Claim
On September 1, 2010, a state prosecutor of the State of São Paulo, Brazil presented a claim
against the Companys Brazilian subsidiary. The state prosecutor alleges that the Brazilian
subsidiary should improve its customer service level and provide (among other things) a
telephone number for customer support. On November 17, 2011, the Judge of the first instance
court granted an injunction against the Brazilian subsidiary imposing the obligation to
provide customer service over telephone means within 60 days with a penalty of approximately $
65,000 per day of non-compliance. On April 8, 2011, the Company was summoned of the lawsuit
and the injunction. On April 14, 2011, the Company presented recourse to the lower court; even
though, the injunction was not lifted, an extension of 30 days was granted, and the
non-compliance fine would start running as of July 11, 2011. On April 20, 2011, the Company
presented an appeal and requested to suspend the effects of the injunction issued by the lower
court until the appeal is decided by State Court of Appeals which was granted on May, 4, 2011.
State of Rio de Janeiro Fraud Claim
On April 15, 2011, a state prosecutor of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil presented a claim
against the Brazilian subsidiary. The state prosecutor requests several clauses of the Terms
of Service of the Website shall be considered null and void. The prosecutor alleges that the
Brazilian subsidiary should be held liable for any fraud committed by sellers on the Brazilian
version of the Companys website, or responsible for damages suffered by buyers when
purchasing an item on the Brazilian version of the MercadoLibre website. On May 5, 2011, the
Lower Court Judge granted an injunction in favor of the State of Rio de Janeiro prosecutor,
declaring that several clauses in the Terms of Service of the Website that limit the
responsibility of the Brazilian subsidiary shall be considered null and void and ordered the
Brazilian subsidiary to remove them, with a penalty of approximately $640 per day of
non-compliance, according to the exchange rate at that moment. On July 8, 2011 the Company
presented a recourse to the lower court requesting a suspension of the effects of the
injunction. On July 13, 2011 the lower Court Judge suspended the injunction and set a hearing
on July 20, 2011, however no settlement was reached by the
parties on the hearing. The Company presented its defense on
July 25, 2011.
Intellectual Property Claims
In the past third parties have from time to time claimed, and others may claim in the future,
that we have infringed their intellectual property rights. We have been notified of several
potential third-party claims for intellectual property infringement through our website. These
claims, whether meritorious or not, are time consuming, can be costly to resolve, could cause
service upgrade delays, and could require expensive implementations of changes to our business
methods to respond to these claims. See Item 1A Risk factorsRisks related to our
businessWe could potentially face legal and financial liability for the sale of items that
infringe on the intellectual property rights of others and for information disseminated on the
MercadoLibre marketplace.
During this quarter there have been no material changes in our risk factors from those
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Agreement dated June 2, 2011, entered into by MercadoLibre
Venezuela S.A. a subsidiary of MercadoLibre, Inc. with
Inversiones 1182450, C.A. to acquire an office property in
Caracas, Venezuela.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document*** |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*** |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*** |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*** |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*** |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
|
*** |
|
XBRL information is
furnished and not filed or a
part of a registration
statement or prospectus for
purposes of sections 11 or
12 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1933, is
deemed not filed for
purposes of section 18 of
the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, and otherwise
is not subject to liability
under these sections. |
53
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MERCADOLIBRE, INC.
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
|
Date: August 8, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Marcos Galperín
|
|
|
|
Marcos Galperín |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Pedro Arnt
|
|
|
|
Pedro Arnt |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
54
MercadoLibre, Inc.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Agreement dated June 2, 2011,
entered into by MercadoLibre
Venezuela S.A. a subsidiary of
MercadoLibre, Inc. with
Inversiones 1182450, C.A. to
acquire an office property in
Caracas, Venezuela.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
55