MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE INC - Quarter Report: 2008 December (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2008
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-14902
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.
Incorporated under the laws of Ohio
31-0888197
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3471 River Hills Drive
Cincinnati, Ohio 45244
(513) 271-3700
Cincinnati, Ohio 45244
(513) 271-3700
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding January 30, 2009 | |
Common Stock, no par value | 40,399,534 | |
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
Page(s) | ||||||||
PART I | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|||||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5-6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8-15 | ||||||||
Item 2. | 15-20 | |||||||
Item 3. | 20 | |||||||
Item 4. | 20 | |||||||
PART II. | ||||||||
Item 1A. | 20 | |||||||
Item 6. | 21 | |||||||
Signature | 22 | |||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32 |
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor from civil
litigation for forward-looking statements accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements.
Except for historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which may be identified by words such as estimates,
anticipates, projects, plans, seeks, may, will, expects, intends, believes,
should and similar expressions or the negative versions thereof and which also may be
identified by their context. Such statements, whether expressed or implied, are based upon
current expectations of the Company and speak only as of the date made. The Company assumes no
obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to
various risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially, including, without limitation, the following: Meridians continued growth depends,
in part, on its ability to introduce into the marketplace enhancements of existing products or
new products that incorporate technological advances, meet customer requirements and respond to
products developed by Meridians competition. While Meridian has introduced a number of
internally developed products, there can be no assurance that it will be successful in the
future in introducing such products on a timely basis. Ongoing consolidations of reference
laboratories and formation of multi-hospital alliances may cause adverse changes to pricing and
distribution. Recessionary pressures on the economy and the markets in which our customers
operate can change expected results, as well as adverse trends in buying patterns from
customers. Costs and difficulties in complying with laws and regulations administered by the
United States Food and Drug Administration can result in unanticipated expenses and delays and
interruptions to the sale of new and existing products. Changes in the relative strength or
weakness of the U.S. dollar can also change expected results. One of Meridians main growth
strategies is the acquisition of companies and product lines. There can be no assurance that
additional acquisitions will be consummated or that, if consummated, will be successful and the
acquired businesses successfully integrated into Meridians operations. In addition to the
factors described in this paragraph, Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of our Form 10-K contains a
list and description of uncertainties, risks and other matters that may affect the Company.
Page 2 of 22
Table of Contents
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended December 31 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
NET SALES |
$ | 34,293 | $ | 33,847 | ||||
COST OF SALES |
10,949 | 12,095 | ||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
23,344 | 21,752 | ||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||
Research and development |
2,064 | 1,536 | ||||||
Selling and marketing |
4,967 | 4,690 | ||||||
General and administrative |
4,155 | 4,333 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
11,186 | 10,559 | ||||||
OPERATING INCOME |
12,158 | 11,193 | ||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
||||||||
Interest income |
262 | 455 | ||||||
Other, net |
(148 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||
Total other income (expense) |
114 | 375 | ||||||
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
12,272 | 11,568 | ||||||
INCOME TAX PROVISION |
4,196 | 4,112 | ||||||
NET EARNINGS |
$ | 8,076 | $ | 7,456 | ||||
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.19 | ||||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.18 | ||||
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING BASIC |
40,318 | 39,910 | ||||||
DILUTIVE COMMON SHARE OPTIONS |
807 | 1,057 | ||||||
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING DILUTED |
41,125 | 40,967 | ||||||
ANTI-DILUTIVE SECURITIES: |
||||||||
Common share options |
112 | 2 | ||||||
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.11 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page 3 of 22
Table of Contents
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended December 31 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 8,076 | $ | 7,456 | ||||
Non-cash items: |
||||||||
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
731 | 705 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets and deferred costs |
404 | 426 | ||||||
Stock based compensation |
286 | 273 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(290 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Unrealized loss on auction-rate securities and rights, net |
104 | | ||||||
Change in accounts receivable, inventory, and prepaid expenses |
(209 | ) | 1,863 | |||||
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and income taxes payable |
(2,936 | ) | (1,808 | ) | ||||
Other |
11 | (177 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
6,177 | 8,550 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment |
(618 | ) | (736 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from calls of auction-rate securities |
425 | | ||||||
Purchases of auction-rate securities |
| (5,000 | ) | |||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(193 | ) | (5,736 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Dividends paid |
(5,644 | ) | (4,392 | ) | ||||
Proceeds and tax benefits from exercise of stock options |
160 | 598 | ||||||
Other |
(12 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used for financing activities |
(5,496 | ) | (3,794 | ) | ||||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Equivalents |
(24 | ) | 90 | |||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents |
464 | (890 | ) | |||||
Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
49,297 | 49,400 | ||||||
Cash and Equivalents at End of Period |
$ | 49,761 | $ | 48,510 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page 4 of 22
Table of Contents
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2008 | 2008 | |||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 49,761 | $ | 49,297 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $236 and $230 |
21,145 | 25,098 | ||||||
Inventories |
24,958 | 19,945 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
2,221 | 3,382 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,869 | 1,736 | ||||||
Total current assets |
99,954 | 99,458 | ||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: |
||||||||
Land |
888 | 892 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements |
18,308 | 16,977 | ||||||
Machinery, equipment and furniture |
26,209 | 26,458 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
1,944 | 3,391 | ||||||
Subtotal |
47,349 | 47,718 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
27,790 | 28,043 | ||||||
Net property, plant and equipment |
19,559 | 19,675 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
9,866 | 9,861 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
8,381 | 8,786 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||
Investments in auction-rate securities and Auction
Rate Security Rights |
7,221 | 7,480 | ||||||
Other assets |
144 | 171 | ||||||
Total other assets |
26,612 | 27,298 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 146,125 | $ | 146,431 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page 5 of 22
Table of Contents
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2008 | 2008 | |||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 3,571 | $ | 4,777 | ||||
Accrued payroll costs |
4,350 | 6,777 | ||||||
Purchase business combination liability |
7 | 3 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
3,488 | 3,613 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
1,624 | 891 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
13,040 | 16,061 | ||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
1,658 | 1,881 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued |
| | ||||||
Common shares, no par value, 71,000,000 shares authorized,
40,330,457 and 40,313,656 shares issued, respectively |
| | ||||||
Treasury shares, 190 and 0, respectively |
(5 | ) | | |||||
Additional paid-in capital |
89,609 | 89,107 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
41,448 | 39,016 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
375 | 366 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
131,427 | 128,489 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 146,125 | $ | 146,431 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page 6 of 22
Table of Contents
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity (Unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity (Unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands)
Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Shares Held in | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Total Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued | Treasury | Treasury Stock | Capital | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Income (Loss) | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
40,314 | | $ | | $ | 89,107 | $ | 39,016 | $ | 366 | $ | 128,489 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
| | | (5,644 | ) | | (5,644 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
16 | | 223 | | | 223 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares for issuance of anniversary awards |
| | (5 | ) | | | | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
| | | 286 | | | 286 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of S-8 registration statement |
| | | (7 | ) | | | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings |
| | | | 8,076 | | $ | 8,076 | 8,076 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedging activity |
| | | | | (22 | ) | (22 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfer of
AFS securities to trading classification |
| | | | | 270 | 270 | 270 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income taxes |
| | | | | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| | | | | (234 | ) | (234 | ) | (234 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 8,085 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
40,330 | | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 89,609 | $ | 41,448 | $ | 375 | $ | 131,427 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page 7 of 22
Table of Contents
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation:
The consolidated financial statements included herein have not been audited by an independent
registered public accounting firm, but include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
entries), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results
for such periods.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Meridian believes that the disclosures
included in these financial statements are adequate to make the information not misleading.
It is suggested that these consolidated interim financial statements be read in conjunction with
the consolidated annual financial statements and notes thereto, included in Meridians Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended September 30, 2008.
The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected for the year.
2. Significant Accounting Policies:
(a) | Revenue Recognition |
Revenue is generally recognized from sales when product is shipped and title has passed to
the buyer. Revenue for the US Diagnostics operating segment is reduced at the date of sale
for estimated rebates that will be claimed by customers. Management estimates accruals for
rebate agreements based on historical statistics, current trends, and other factors.
Changes to the accruals are recorded in the period that they become known. Our rebate
accruals were $3,234 at December 31, 2008 and $3,259 at September 30, 2008.
Life Science revenue for contract services may come from standalone arrangements for process
development and/or optimization work (contract research and development services) or custom
manufacturing, or multiple-deliverable arrangements that include process development work
followed by larger-scale manufacturing (both contract research and development services and
contract manufacturing services). Revenue is recognized based on the nature of the
arrangements, using the principles in EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables. The framework in EITF 00-21 is based on each of the multiple deliverables in
a given arrangement having distinct and separate fair values. Fair values are determined
via consistent pricing between standalone arrangements and multiple deliverable
arrangements, as well as a competitive bidding process. Contract research and development
services may be performed on a time and materials basis or fixed fee basis. For time
and materials arrangements, revenue is recognized as services are performed and billed.
For fixed fee arrangements, revenue is recognized upon completion and acceptance by the
customer. For contract manufacturing services, revenue is generally recognized upon
delivery of product and acceptance by the customer. In some cases, customers may request
that we store on their behalf, clinical grade biologicals that we produce under contract
manufacturing agreements. These cases arise when customers do not have clinical grade
storage facilities or do not want to risk contamination during transport. For such cases,
revenue may be recognized on a bill-and-hold basis pursuant to the satisfaction of criteria
in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins Nos. 101 and 104 related to bill-and-hold revenue
recognition.
Trade accounts receivable are recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at
invoiced amounts less provisions for rebates and doubtful accounts. The allowance for
doubtful accounts represents our estimate of probable credit losses and is based on
historical write-off experience. The allowance for doubtful accounts and related metrics,
such as days sales outstanding, are reviewed monthly. Accounts with past due
Page 8 of 22
Table of Contents
balances over 90 days are reviewed individually for collectibility. Customer
invoices are charged off against the allowance when we believe it is probable the invoices
will not be paid.
(b) | Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive income represents the net change in shareholders equity during a period from
sources other than transactions with shareholders. Our comprehensive income or loss is
comprised of net earnings, foreign currency translation, changes in the fair value of
forward exchange contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges, and changes in the fair value
of available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities.
Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated using period-end exchange rates
with gains or losses resulting from translation included in a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Revenues and expenses are translated using
exchange rates prevailing during the period. We also recognize foreign currency transaction
gains and losses on certain assets and liabilities that are denominated in the Euro
currency. These gains and losses are included in other income and expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Comprehensive income for the interim periods was as follows:
Three Months | ||||||||
Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 8,076 | $ | 7,456 | ||||
Hedging activity |
(22 | ) | (75 | ) | ||||
Transfer of
AFS securities to trading classification |
270 | | ||||||
Income taxes |
(5 | ) | (74 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(234 | ) | 281 | |||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 8,085 | $ | 7,588 | ||||
(c) | Income Taxes |
The provision for income taxes includes federal, foreign, state, and local income taxes
currently payable and those deferred because of temporary differences between income for
financial reporting and income for tax purposes. We prepare estimates of permanent and
temporary differences between income for financial reporting purposes and income for tax
purposes. These differences are adjusted to actual upon filing of our tax returns,
typically occurring in the third and fourth quarters of the current fiscal year for the
preceding fiscal years estimates.
Our provision for income taxes also includes a component for uncertain tax positions in
accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN
48). FIN 48 requires use of a benefit recognition model with a two-step approach: (i) a
more-likely-than-not recognition criterion and (ii) a measurement attribute that measures
the position as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being
ultimately realized upon ultimate settlement. If it is not more likely than not that the
benefit will be sustained on its technical merits, no benefit is recorded. We recognize
accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a portion of our
income tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations.
(d) | Stock-based Compensation |
We account for stock-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment.
SFAS No. 123R requires recognition of compensation expense for all share-based awards made
to employees and outside directors, based upon the fair value of the share-based award on
the date of the grant.
Page 9 of 22
Table of Contents
(e) | Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments |
Our investment portfolio includes the following components:
December 31, 2008 | September 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and Equivalents | Other Assets | Cash and Equivalents | Other Assets | |||||||||||||
Taxable investments - |
||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
$ | | $ | | $ | 6,711 | $ | | ||||||||
Money market funds |
24,018 | | | | ||||||||||||
UBS Auction Rate Security Rights |
| 660 | | | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt investments - |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
13,273 | | 12,848 | | ||||||||||||
Variable rate demand notes |
| | 23,948 | | ||||||||||||
Student loan auction-rate securities |
| 6,561 | | 7,480 | ||||||||||||
Cash on hand - |
||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing |
||||||||||||||||
Unrestricted |
6,883 | | | | ||||||||||||
Restricted |
| 1,000 | | 1,000 | ||||||||||||
Interest bearing unrestricted |
5,587 | | 5,790 | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 49,761 | $ | 8,221 | $ | 49,297 | $ | 8,480 | ||||||||
As a result of conditions in the financial markets, during October 2008, we moved
all of our investments in municipal variable rate demand notes to institutional money market
mutual funds invested in either US Treasuries or repurchase agreements collateralized by US
Treasuries. We also moved investments in a bank overnight repurchase agreement account to
a non-interest bearing deposit account to take advantage of a FDIC insurance program.
Existing investments in institutional tax-exempt money market mutual funds are covered under
the US Treasurys Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds. This program provides
a guarantee to money market mutual fund shareholders of $1 per share net asset value for
funds invested as of September 19, 2008, if the fund were to liquidate its assets as a
result of its net asset value falling below $0.995.
The primary objectives of our investment activities are to preserve capital and provide
sufficient liquidity to meet operating requirements and fund strategic initiatives such as
acquisitions. We maintain a written investment policy that governs the management of our
investments in fixed income securities. This policy, among other things, provides that we
may purchase only high credit-quality securities, that have short-term ratings of at least
A-1 and P-1 or better, and long-term ratings of at least A-2 and A or better, by Moodys and
Standard & Poors, respectively, at the time of purchase.
We consider short-term investments with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash
equivalents, including overnight repurchase agreements, investments in municipal variable
rate demand notes that have a seven-day put feature and institutional money market funds.
Our investments in repurchase agreements at September 30, 2008 were with a commercial bank
pursuant to an overnight sweep/liquidity arrangement with our operating cash accounts. Our
investments in variable rate demand notes at September 30, 2008 contained a seven-day put
feature.
Our investments in tax-exempt variable rate demand notes, prior to their complete
liquidation in October 2008, and student loan auction-rate securities, prior to the
settlement agreement with UBS discussed below, were accounted for as available-for-sale
under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. As
such, unrealized holding gains and losses were reported as a component of other
comprehensive income or loss within shareholders equity until realized, except where losses
were considered to be other-than-temporary, in which case they would have been recorded to
other income and expense, net. As of September 30, 2008, we did not have any losses that
were considered other-than-temporary under SFAS No. 115, and accumulated other comprehensive
income included $270 of unrealized holding losses related to student loan auction-rate
securities.
Page 10 of 22
Table of Contents
Our investment portfolio includes student loan auction-rate securities, which are long-term
student loan revenue bonds whose interest rates are reset every 35 days via a Dutch auction
process. All of our auction-
rate securities are backed by pools of student loans originated under the Federal Family
Education Loan Program (FFELP). FFELP student loans are guaranteed by State guarantors who
have reinsurance agreements with the US Department of Education. All of our student loan
auction-rate securities were rated Aaa and AAA by Moodys and Standard & Poors,
respectively, at the time of purchase, and have continued to maintain these credit ratings
through the present time.
The Dutch auction process historically provided the necessary liquidity mechanism to either
purchase or sell these securities. Beginning in mid-February 2008, liquidity issues in the
US credit markets resulted in the failure of auctions across a broad spectrum of tax-exempt
securities, including student loan revenue bonds. Auctions for the student loan revenue
bonds that we hold have continued to fail through the present time. The consequence of a
failed auction is that we do not have access to the principal amount of our investments.
Issuers are still required to make interest payments when due in the event of failed
auctions. We have not experienced any missed interest payments to date.
Our auction-rate securities were purchased through UBS Financial Services, Inc. During
November 2008, we accepted an offer from UBS, AG (UBS) of Auction Rate Security Rights.
These rights permit us to require UBS between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012 (the exercise
period) to purchase our auction-rate securities at par value. In exchange, UBS is granted
the right, at their sole discretion, to sell or otherwise dispose of our auction-rate
security investments until July 2, 2012 as long as we receive a payment of par value upon
the sale or disposition. In addition, the rights permit us to establish a demand revolving
credit line in an amount equal to the par value of the securities at a net zero cost. We
are still able to sell the auction-rate securities on our own, but in such a circumstance,
we would lose the par value support from UBS.
Upon executing the settlement agreement with UBS, we recognized the Auction Rate Security
Rights as a stand-alone financial instrument by electing the fair value option under SFAS
No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. We also transferred the student loan auction-rate
securities from the available-for-sale classification, to the trading classification under
SFAS No. 115. Upon transfer to the trading classification, $270 in unrealized losses as of
September 30, 2008, were transferred to other income and expense. Adjustments to record the
student loan auction-rate securities and the Auction Rate Security Rights at fair value are
recorded to other income and expense in each accounting period. As of December 31, 2008,
the fair value of the student-loan auction rate securities was $6,561 compared to a par
value of $7,325. As of December 31, 2008, the fair value of the Auction Rate Security
Rights was $660. The student loan auction-rate securities are included in other long-term
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet based on the maturities of the student
loan revenue bonds (2029 to 2037). The Auction Rate Security Rights are included in other
long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet based on the earliest
exercise date of June 30, 2010.
(f) | Derivative financial instruments |
We account for our derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. These instruments
are designated as cash flow hedges, and therefore, the effective portion of the net gain or
loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods
during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. For the ineffective portion of the
hedge, gains or losses are charged to earnings in the current period. All derivative
instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the consolidated
balance sheets. Cash flows from our hedging instruments are classified in operating
activities, consistent with cash flows from the related items being hedged. See Note 6.
(g) | New Accounting Pronouncements |
Effective October 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
defines fair value and provides a framework for measuring fair value, including a hierarchy
that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques into three broad levels. This fair
value hierarchy gives the highest priority
Page 11 of 22
Table of Contents
to quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. See Note 7. In
October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. This FSP clarifies
application of SFAS No. 157 to financial assets when the market is inactive, such as the case with debt
securities that were issued via the auction-rate markets. This FSP was effective upon
issuance and was taken into consideration in the valuation of our investments in student
loan auction-rate securities and the UBS Auction Rate Security Rights.
In connection with the UBS settlement discussed in Note 2(e), we adopted SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment
of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits an entity to choose to measure certain
financial instruments and other items at fair value where such financial instruments and
other items are not currently required to be measured at fair value. For financial
instruments and other items where the fair value option is elected, unrealized gains and
losses are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.
3. Inventories:
Inventories are comprised of the following:
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2008 | 2008 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 5,920 | $ | 5,238 | ||||
Work-in-process |
4,806 | 4,867 | ||||||
Finished goods |
14,232 | 9,840 | ||||||
$ | 24,958 | $ | 19,945 | |||||
4. Major Customers and Segment Information:
Meridian was formed in 1976 and functions as a fully integrated research, development,
manufacturing, marketing and sales organization with primary emphasis in the field of life science.
Our principal businesses are (i) the development, manufacture and distribution of diagnostic test
kits primarily for certain respiratory, gastrointestinal, viral and parasitic infectious diseases,
(ii) the manufacture and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, and reagents used by
researchers and other diagnostic manufacturers and (iii) the contract manufacture of proteins and
other biologicals under clinical cGMP conditions for use by biopharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines.
Our reportable operating segments are US Diagnostics, European Diagnostics, and Life Science. The
US Diagnostics operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Cincinnati, Ohio, and the
sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits in North America, South America and the Pacific Rim.
The European Diagnostics operating segment consists of the sale and distribution of diagnostic test
kits in Europe, Scandinavia, Africa, and the Middle East. The Life Science operating segment
consists of manufacturing operations in Memphis, Tennessee, Saco, Maine, and Boca Raton, Florida,
and the sale and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies and bioresearch reagents domestically
and abroad. The Life Science operating segment also includes the contract development and
manufacture of cGMP clinical grade proteins and other biologicals for use by biopharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines.
Two customers accounted for 59% and 60% of the US Diagnostics operating segment third-party sales
during the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Two customers accounted
for 29% and 36% of the Life Science operating segment third-party sales during the three months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Page 12 of 22
Table of Contents
Segment information for the interim periods is as follows:
US | European | Life | ||||||||||||||||||
Diagnostics | Diagnostics | Science | Eliminations(1) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months December 31, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales- |
||||||||||||||||||||
Third-party |
$ | 23,485 | $ | 5,671 | $ | 5,137 | $ | | $ | 34,293 | ||||||||||
Inter-segment |
2,488 | | 188 | (2,676 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Operating income |
10,387 | 850 | 847 | 74 | 12,158 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets (December 31, 2008) |
126,303 | 16,015 | 50,676 | (46,869 | ) | 146,125 | ||||||||||||||
Three Months December 31, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales- |
||||||||||||||||||||
Third-party |
$ | 22,219 | $ | 6,099 | $ | 5,529 | $ | | $ | 33,847 | ||||||||||
Inter-segment |
2,300 | | 142 | (2,442 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Operating income |
8,936 | 1,159 | 991 | 107 | 11,193 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets (September 30, 2008) |
126,808 | 15,955 | 49,619 | (45,951 | ) | 146,431 |
(1) | Eliminations consist of intersegment transactions. |
Transactions between operating segments are accounted for at established intercompany prices for
internal and management purposes with all intercompany amounts eliminated in consolidation. Total
assets for the US Diagnostics and Life Science operating segments include goodwill of $1,382 and
$8,484, respectively, at December 31, 2008, and $1,382 and $8,479, respectively, at September 30,
2008.
5. Intangible Assets:
A summary of our acquired intangible assets subject to amortization, as of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008 is as follows:
December 31, 2008 | September 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Wtd Avg | Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||
Amort | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||
Period (Yrs) | Value | Amortization | Value | Amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Core products and cell lines |
15 | $ | 4,698 | $ | 2,675 | $ | 4,698 | $ | 2,602 | |||||||||||
Manufacturing technologies |
14 | 6,057 | 4,530 | 6,057 | 4,440 | |||||||||||||||
Trademarks, licenses and patents |
7 | 2,663 | 1,874 | 2,663 | 1,843 | |||||||||||||||
Customer lists and supply agreements |
13 | 11,039 | 6,997 | 11,039 | 6,786 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 24,457 | $ | 16,076 | $ | 24,457 | $ | 15,671 | |||||||||||||
The actual aggregate amortization expense for these intangible assets for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $405,000 and $426,000, respectively.
6. Hedging Transactions:
Prior to February 1, 2009, we managed exchange rate risk related to forecasted intercompany sales
denominated in the Euro currency through the use of forward exchange contracts. In accordance with
SFAS No. 133, we designated such forward contracts as cash flow hedges. As such, the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument was reported as a component of other
comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the
hedged transaction affected earnings. The amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive income into income on the effective portion of these foreign exchange contracts
was $85 and $(70) for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Gains and
losses on the derivative instruments representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components
Page 13 of 22
Table of Contents
excluded from the assessment of effectiveness were recognized in current earnings. For the three
months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, no portion of the gain/loss was excluded from other
comprehensive income due to
effectiveness testing. All such forward contracts were recognized as either other assets or other
accrued expenses at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2008, the
fair value liability for our forward exchange contracts was $46 and we had 3,200 notional amount
of such contracts outstanding at an average exchange rate of 1.3786.
During January 2009, 500 notional amount of these contracts were settled in accordance with their
original maturities. The realized gain on these contracts was $32. Also during January 2009, we
accelerated the settlement of the remaining 2,700 notional amount of forward exchange contracts
that were originally scheduled to mature between February 27, 2009 and December 31, 2009. These
transactions resulted in a gain of approximately $140 that will be recorded in the second quarter
of fiscal 2009. We unwound these forward exchange contracts after completing a strategic review of
our foreign currency exposures. This strategic review determined that we have natural currency
hedges in place for consolidated gross profit and operating income via certain Meridian-branded
diagnostic test kits that we purchase in Euros from suppliers in Spain and Germany.
7. Fair Value Measurements:
We adopted the fair value measurement as described in SFAS No. 157 on October 1, 2008 to value our
financial assets and liabilities. As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price that would
be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in
fair value measurements and related disclosures, SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels,
which are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are
accessible at the measurement date for assets and liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the
highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets
or liabilities, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, that is, markets in which there are
few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, or price quotations vary
substantially either over time or among market makers, or in which little information is released
publicly and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by
correlation or other means.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs, developed using the Companys estimates and assumptions, which
reflect those that the market participants would use. Such inputs are used when little or no
market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
Determining where an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy depends on the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole. In determining fair value, the
Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and considers counterparty credit risk in the
assessment of fair value.
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value at December 31, 2008 are classified in the
table below in one of the three categories described above:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Student loan auction-rate securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | 6,561 | $ | 6,561 | ||||||||
UBS Auction Rate Security Rights |
| | 660 | 660 | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
| (46 | ) | | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | (46 | ) | $ | 7,221 | $ | 7,175 | |||||||
The failed auction status and lack of liquidity for our student loan auction-rate securities and
the non-transferability of our UBS Auction Rate Security Rights requires the use of a valuation
methodology that relies exclusively on Level 3 inputs including market, tax status, credit quality,
duration, recent market observations and overall capital market liquidity. The valuation of our
student loan auction-rate securities and UBS Auction Rate Security Rights is subject to
Page 14 of 22
Table of Contents
uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Factors that may impact the valuations include
changes to credit ratings of the securities as well as to the underlying assets supporting those
securities, rates of default of the underlying assets, underlying collateral value, discount rates,
counterparty risk and ongoing strength and quality of market credit and liquidity.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Refer to Forward Looking Statements following the Index in front of this Form 10-Q. In the
discussion that follows, all dollars are in thousands (both tables and text), except per share
data.
Overview:
Regardless of overall economic conditions in the US and around the world, we aim to deliver
mid-teens sales growth rates and at least 20% to 25% earnings growth on an annual basis. During
our first quarter of fiscal 2009, we experienced adverse trends in buying patterns from certain of
our major customers that led to single-digit sales and earnings growth rates.
The following table shows our sales and growth rates for the three, six and twelve-month periods
ending December 31, 2008:
Three | Inc | Six | Inc | Twelve | Inc | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating Segment | Months | (Dec) | Months | (Dec) | Months | (Dec) | ||||||||||||||||||
US Diagnostics |
$ | 23,485 | +6 | % | $ | 47,027 | +14 | % | $ | 89,685 | +15 | % | ||||||||||||
European Diagnostics |
5,671 | -7 | % | 11,941 | +1 | % | 27,552 | +13 | % | |||||||||||||||
Life Science |
5,137 | -7 | % | 11,800 | -11 | % | 22,848 | -11 | % | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 34,293 | +1 | % | $ | 70,768 | +7 | % | $ | 140,085 | +9 | % | ||||||||||||
There were two primary trends in buying patterns for the US Diagnostics operating segment that
affected sales levels and growth for the first quarter of fiscal 2009. As we reported in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2008, we began to see
significant sales volume increases in influenza and respiratory syncytial virus products in advance
of the 2008-2009 upper respiratory season during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, driven by the
timing of promotions offered by a third-party manufacturer of certain products, which are passed
along to our customers. This particular trend in buying patterns led, in part, to the 24% and 18%
growth rates in sales for the fourth quarter and full fiscal year in fiscal 2008, respectively.
Sales growth rates of 14% and 15% for the six and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2008,
respectively, reflect a smoothing effect of this particular trend. We ultimately measure our growth and level of success for
upper respiratory products based on the full selling season, which typically runs from August
through March, also taking into consideration the relative strength of the season.
In addition, sales to our US Diagnostics operating segments largest distribution customer
were essentially flat for the current quarter. This distributor typically buys larger volumes
of certain products during our first fiscal quarter in advance of our January 1st price increase.
However, for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, purchases of these products by this distributor
were significantly less than last year.
We believe this distributors buying patterns are being affected by its efforts to conserve
cash
and reduce inventory. In order to monitor sales trends for our products that are sold through
distributor channels, our two primary distributors provide us with sales data for our products
that are sold by them to end-users. Sales of our products by this distributor to end-users
increased 15% for the four months ended January 31, 2009. The increase in this distributors
sales of our products was led by C. difficile and foodborne products.
Sales for our European Diagnostics operating segment during the first quarter of fiscal 2009
reflect a growth rate of -7%, including the effects of foreign currency. Organic sales growth,
which excludes the effects of foreign currency, was +1%. We target organic sales growth of 10% to
15% for our European Diagnostics operating segment. Sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2009
were affected by buying patterns in certain of our European export markets as well as price competition in our
Italian market for H. pylori products.
Sales for our Life Science operating segment during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 reflect a
growth rate of -7%. This growth rate reflects buying patterns from our largest diagnostic
manufacturing customer, who accounted for
Page 15 of 22
Table of Contents
15% of the Life Science Operating segments sales in the
first quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to 28% in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and 21% for the
full year in fiscal 2008. We sell three primary products to this customer. During the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, this customer reduced its forecasted requirements for two antigen products
due to its internal inventory management initiatives and its market factors. For the third
product, a blocking reagent, this customer had a stocking order during the first quarter of fiscal
2008 related to adding the product to additional assays. This stocking order did not repeat during
the first quarter of fiscal 2009. As we look forward to
the remainder of fiscal 2009, we believe that this customer will return to positive sales growth.
Despite the negative effects of customer buying patterns and foreign currency on net sales, we
generated a consolidated gross profit margin of 68%, our highest percentage in over 10 years. This
level of gross profit margin reflects favorable sales mix, favorable efficiencies from automation
in our US Diagnostics manufacturing plant, and improved operating performance and utilization of
our Life Science manufacturing facilities in Memphis, Tennessee. Although foreign currency
exchange rates had a negative effect on sales of our European Diagnostics operating segment, they
had no significant effect on consolidated gross profit or consolidated operating income due to
natural hedges. Our US Diagnostics operating segment markets and sells certain Meridian-branded
diagnostic test kits that are sourced from European suppliers in Spain and Germany. These kits are
purchased in Euros, which provides a natural hedge to gross profit and operating income on a
consolidated basis.
Sales growth in our diagnostic businesses will continue to be
driven by C. difficile, H. pylori and
foodborne diseases, as well as the introduction of new distributors in certain of our export
markets. We recently launched a new foodborne infectious disease test for Campylobacter in our PremierTM platform
in US and European markets. During the remainder of calendar 2009, we expect to launch another Campylobacter
infectious disease test in our Immuno Card Stat!® platform, and our first molecular C. difficile product
under the ILLUMIgene
brand. We expect our Life Science operating segment to not only return to positive sales growth
for the remainder of fiscal 2009, but to also improve its contribution to consolidated operating
income and net earnings. We expect our Life Science sales growth and operating performance
improvement to be driven by new product launches and improved operating performance and utilization
in our Memphis, Tennessee facility.
The recessionary
state of the economy is affecting not only the US, but also countries around the
world. If current economic conditions worsen or remain in the current state for an extended period
of time, our sales levels could be adversely affected by customer buying patterns in their efforts
to conserve cash and manage inventory levels. On a longer-term basis, in a recessed economic
state, our sales levels could be adversely impacted by the number of diagnostic tests performed in
the healthcare system, if, for example, there were declines in physician office visits and/or
hospital admissions. Our product portfolios, for both diagnostics and life science, deal with
acute patient symptoms and infectious diseases. To date, we have not seen any significant reduced
end-user demand for our major products.
Overall stock market valuations have significantly declined in recent months, which may raise
questions around the potential impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets. Our annual
goodwill impairment review under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, takes place as
of June 30th each year. There have been no impairments from these annual reviews.
Despite the overall decline in stock market valuations, as of January 30, 2009, our stock price was
$21.26 per share, compared to our book value per share of $3.26 as of December 31, 2008. This
relationship, stock price trading at 6.5x book value, is an indicator that the decline in overall
stock market valuations, and its impact on our stock price, has not been a triggering event for
impairment of our goodwill and other long-lived assets.
From a cash flow perspective, we expect cash flows from operations to be sufficient to fund working
capital requirements, capital expenditure requirements and dividends over the next 12 months.
Page 16 of 22
Table of Contents
Results of Operations:
Net sales
Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Inc (Dec) |
||||||||||
US Diagnostics |
$ | 23,485 | $ | 22,219 | +6 | % | ||||||
European Diagnostics |
5,671 | 6,099 | -7 | % | ||||||||
Life Science |
5,137 | 5,529 | -7 | % | ||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 34,293 | $ | 33,847 | +1 | % | ||||||
International
|
||||||||||||
US Export |
$ | 3,424 | $ | 3,361 | +2 | % | ||||||
European Diagnostics |
5,671 | 6,099 | -7 | % | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 9,095 | $ | 9,460 | -4 | % | ||||||
% of total sales |
27 | % | 28 | % |
Sales growth for US Diagnostics was primarily related to volume increases across certain of our key
product families, foodborne products and C. difficile products. Volume increases for foodborne
products were driven by sales of ImmunoCard STAT!® EHEC for toxigenic E. coli. Volume
increases in C. difficile products were driven by increased sales of our rapid diagnostic test,
ImmunoCard® Toxins A & B. These increases were partially offset by volume decreases in
respiratory products caused by a shift in timing of an annual promotion offered by one of our
suppliers. This shift caused an increase in sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and a
corresponding decrease in sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
This distributor typically buys larger volumes of certain products during our first fiscal
quarter in advance of our January 1st price increase. However, for the first quarter of fiscal
2009, purchases of these products by this distributor were significantly less than last year.
We believe this distributors buying patterns are being affected by its efforts to conserve
cash and reduce inventory.
In order to monitor sales trends for our products that are sold through distributor channels,
our two primary distributors provide us with sales data for our products that are sold by them
to end-users. Sales of our products by this distributor to end-users increased 15% for the four
months ended January 31, 2009. The increase in this distributors sales of our
products was led
by C. difficile and foodborne products. Two national distributors accounted for 59% and 60% of
total sales for the US Diagnostics operating segment for each of the first quarters of fiscal
2009 and 2008, respectively.
Two national distributors accounted for 59% and 60% of total sales for the US Diagnostics
operating segment for each of the first quarters of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively.
For the European Diagnostics operating segment, the sales decrease includes currency translation
losses in the amount of $477 for the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Organic sales growth, which
excludes the effects of currency translation, was +1% for the first quarter. Sales for the first
quarter of fiscal 2009 were affected by buying patterns in our European export markets as well as
price competition in our Italian market for H. pylori products.
For the Life Science operating segment, the fluctuations in sales reflect changes in demand and
buying patterns of certain of our major diagnostic manufacturing customers. We sell three main
products to one customer, who accounted for 15% and 28% of total sales for the Life Science
operating segment for the first quarters of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, this customer reduced its forecasted requirements for two antigen products
due to its internal inventory management initiatives and its market factors, but also increased its
purchases via a stocking order for a reagent product that it added to additional assays. The
impact of this net reduction was partially offset by another of our major diagnostics customers
increased purchases for the period. These demand changes and buying patterns resulted in net
revenue reductions of approximately $520 for the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Page 17 of 22
Table of Contents
Gross Profit
Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Inc (Dec) | ||||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
$ | 23,344 | $ | 21,752 | +7 | % | ||||||||||
Gross Profit Margin |
68 | % | 64 | % | +4 points | |||||||||||
Our overall operations consist of the sale of diagnostic test kits for various disease states and
in alternative test formats, as well as bioresearch reagents, bulk antigens and antibodies,
proficiency panels, contract research and development and contract manufacturing services. Product
sales mix shifts, in the normal course of business, can cause the consolidated gross profit margin
to fluctuate by several points. A favorable sales mix that was more heavily weighted towards
higher margin, non-upper respiratory, rapid diagnostic tests and bulk antigens and reagents led to
a significant increase in overall gross profit in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Operating Expenses
Three Months Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||
Research & | Sales & | General & | Operating | |||||||||||||
Development | Marketing | Administrative | Expenses | |||||||||||||
2007 Expenses |
$ | 1,536 | $ | 4,690 | $ | 4,333 | $ | 10,559 | ||||||||
% of Sales |
5 | % | 14 | % | 13 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||
Fiscal 2009
Increases
(Decreases): |
||||||||||||||||
US Diagnostics |
537 | 227 | (130 | ) | 634 | |||||||||||
European Diagnostics |
| 26 | 3 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Life Science |
(9 | ) | 24 | (51 | ) | (36 | ) | |||||||||
2008 Expenses |
$ | 2,064 | $ | 4,967 | $ | 4,155 | $ | 11,186 | ||||||||
% of Sales |
6 | % | 14 | % | 12 | % | 33 | % | ||||||||
% Increase (Decrease) |
34 | % | 6 | % | -4 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||
Total operating expenses increased 6% to $11,186 for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to
the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The overall increase in operating expenses is discussed below.
Research and development expenses for the US Diagnostics operating segment increased for the first
quarter primarily due to development costs for our molecular C. difficile product and expenses
related to clinical trials for new products expected to be released during fiscal 2009.
Sales and marketing expenses for the US Diagnostics operating segment increased primarily due to
increased salaries and benefits related to planned headcount additions. Among other personnel, we
have added a new product manager responsible for molecular products as we prepare for new product
launch activities around our molecular C. difficile product and the ILLUMIgene brand.
General and administrative expenses for all operating segments for the first quarter reflected
lower corporate incentive bonus accruals based on relative achievement against bonus targets to
date.
Operating Income
Operating income increased 9% to $12,158 for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, as a result of the
factors discussed
Page 18 of 22
Table of Contents
above.
Other Income and Expense
Other income and expense primarily consists of interest income on our investment portfolio and fair
value adjustments on our auction-rate securities and related Auction Rate Security Rights.
Interest income decreased 42% for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the first quarter of
fiscal 2008, primarily due to lower interest yields in the current interest rate environment. We
expect interest yields to remain low for the foreseeable future for institutional money market
funds, which comprise a majority of our investment portfolio. See Note 2(e) to the consolidated
financial statements herein for discussion of our investment portfolio, including fair value
adjustments on our auction-rate securities and Auction Rate Security Rights.
Income Taxes
The effective rate for income taxes was 34% for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to 36%
for the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the first
quarter was primarily attributable to Federal research and development credits from H.R. 1424,
signed into law in October 2008, and the continued phase-out of corporate income taxes in Ohio.
For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, Meridian expects the effective tax rate to be in the
range of 34% to 35%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
Comparative Cash Flow Analysis
Our cash flow and financing requirements are determined by analyses of operating and capital
spending budgets, consideration of acquisition plans, and consideration of common share dividends.
We have historically maintained a credit facility to augment working capital requirements and to
respond quickly to acquisition opportunities. This credit facility has been supplemented by the
proceeds from a September 2005 common share offering, which during the first quarter of fiscal
2009, were invested in a non-interest bearing bank deposit account, institutional money-market
mutual funds, and tax-exempt auction-rate securities.
We have an investment policy that guides the holdings of our investment portfolio. Our objectives
in managing the investment portfolio are to (i) preserve capital, (ii) provide sufficient liquidity
to meet working capital requirements and fund strategic objectives such as acquisitions, and (iii)
capture a market rate of return commensurate with market conditions and our policys investment
eligibility criteria. As a result of conditions in the financial markets during October 2008, we
moved substantially all of our investments in municipal variable rate demand notes to institutional
money market mutual funds invested in either US Treasuries or repurchase agreements collateralized
by US Treasuries. We also moved investments in a bank overnight repurchase agreement account to a
non-interest bearing deposit account to take advantage of a FDIC insurance program. Existing
investments in institutional tax-exempt money market mutual funds are covered under the US
Treasurys Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds. This program provides a guarantee
to money market mutual fund shareholders of $1 per share net asset value for funds invested as of
September 19, 2008, if the fund were to liquidate its assets as a result of its net asset value
falling below $0.995. As we look forward, we will continue to manage the holdings of our
investment portfolio with preservation of capital being the primary objective.
See Note 2(e) to the consolidated financial statements included herein for discussion of our
investments in tax-exempt auction-rate securities.
We do not expect current conditions in the financial markets or overall economic conditions to have
a significant impact on our liquidity needs, financial condition or results of operations. We
intend to continue to fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditure requirements and
dividends from current cash flows from operating activities. We also have additional sources of
liquidity through our investment portfolio and $30,000 bank credit facility, if needed. To date,
we have not experienced any significant deterioration in the aging of our customer accounts
receivable nor in our vendors ability to supply raw materials and services and extend normal
credit terms. Our liquidity needs may change if overall economic conditions worsen and/or
liquidity and credit within the financial markets remains tight for an extended period of time, and
such conditions impact the
Page 19 of 22
Table of Contents
collectability of our customer accounts receivable, impact credit terms
with our vendors or disrupt the supply of raw materials and services.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased 28% for the first quarter of fiscal 2009
compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2008. This decrease was driven by the US Diagnostics
operating segment carrying higher levels of upper respiratory inventory during the first quarter of
fiscal 2009 (e.g., influenza and respiratory syncytial virus). We expect to sell this inventory
during the remainder of fiscal 2009.
Net cash flows from operating activities are anticipated to be adequate to fund working capital
requirements, capital expenditures and dividends during fiscal 2009.
Capital Resources
We have a $30,000 credit facility with a commercial bank which expires on September 15, 2012. As
of January 31, 2009, there were no borrowings outstanding on this facility and we had 100%
borrowing capacity available to us. We have had no borrowings outstanding under this facility
during the first quarter of fiscal 2009, or during the full year of fiscal 2008.
Our acquisition of OEM Concepts in fiscal 2005 provides for additional purchase consideration up to
a maximum remaining amount of $1,814, contingent upon future calendar-year sales and gross profit
of OEM Concepts products through January 31, 2009. Earnout consideration in the amount of $7 for
calendar 2008 is accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Our capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $4,000 for fiscal 2009 and may be funded
with operating cash flows, availability under the $30,000 credit facility, or cash equivalents and
short-term investments on-hand. Capital expenditures relate to manufacturing and other equipment
of a normal and recurring nature, as well as completion of our facility expansion in Saco, Maine.
We do not utilize any special-purpose financing vehicles or have any undisclosed off balance sheet
arrangements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes in the Companys exposure to market risk since September 30,
2008.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of December 31, 2008, an evaluation was completed under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant
to Rule 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Based on that evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2008. There have been no changes in our
internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of internal
controls that occurred during the first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting, or in other
factors that could materially affect internal controls subsequent to December 31, 2008.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in the Registrants
Form 10-K in response to Item 1A to Part I of Form 10-K.
Page 20 of 22
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Page 21 of 22
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. |
||||
Date: February 9, 2009 | /s/ Melissa Lueke | |||
Melissa Lueke | ||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Page 22 of 22