Annual Statements Open main menu

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE INC - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)

e10vk
Table of Contents

 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     
þ   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011.
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______________ TO__________________
Commission File No. 0-14902
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.
3471 River Hills Drive
Cincinnati, Ohio 45244
IRS Employer ID No. 31-0888197
Incorporated under the Laws of Ohio
Phone: (513) 271-3700
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
     
Title of each class   Name of each exchange of which registered
     
Common Shares, No Par Value   The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
    (NASDAQ Global Select Market)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES þ NO o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this Chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of Common Shares held by non-affiliates as of March 31, 2011 was $957,367,874 based on a closing sale price of $23.99 per share on March 31, 2011. As of October 31, 2011, 41,237,445 no par value Common Shares were issued and outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrant’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 furnished to the Commission pursuant to Rule 14a-3(b) are incorporated by reference in Part II as specified and portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission for its 2012 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting are incorporated by reference in Part III as specified.
 
 

 

 


 

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K
         
 
    Page  
 
       
       
 
       
    4  
 
       
    15  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    23  
 
       
    24  
 
       
    24  
 
       
       
 
       
    24  
 
       
    25  
 
       
    25  
 
       
    43  
 
       
    44  
 
       
    75  
 
       
    75  
 
       
    75  
 
       
       
 
       
    76  
 
       
    76  
 
       
    76  
 
       
    76  
 
       
    76  
 
       
    76  
 
       
 EX-13
 EX-21
 EX-23
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

 

 


Table of Contents

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor from civil litigation for forward-looking statements accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements. Except for historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which may be identified by words such as “estimates”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “plans”, “seeks”, “may”, “will”, “expects”, “intends”, “believes”, “should” and similar expressions or the negative versions thereof and which also may be identified by their context. Such statements, whether expressed or implied, are based upon current expectations of the Company and speak only as of the date made. The Company assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results expressed or implied therein will not be realized. These statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, including, without limitation, the following: Meridian’s continued growth depends, in part, on its ability to introduce into the marketplace enhancements of existing products or new products that incorporate technological advances, meet customer requirements and respond to products developed by Meridian’s competition. While Meridian has introduced a number of internally developed products, there can be no assurance that it will be successful in the future in introducing such products on a timely basis. Meridian relies on proprietary, patented and licensed technologies, and the Company’s ability to protect its intellectual property rights, as well as the potential for intellectual property litigation, would impact its results. Ongoing consolidations of reference laboratories and formation of multi-hospital alliances may cause adverse changes to pricing and distribution. Recessionary pressures on the economy and the markets in which our customers operate, as well as adverse trends in buying patterns from customers can change expected results. Costs and difficulties in complying with laws and regulations, including those administered by the United States Food and Drug Administration, can result in unanticipated expenses and delays and interruptions to the sale of new and existing products. The international scope of Meridian’s operations, including changes in the relative strength or weakness of the U.S. dollar, can make results difficult to predict. One of Meridian’s main growth strategies is the acquisition of companies and product lines. There can be no assurance that additional acquisitions will be consummated or that, if consummated, will be successful and the acquired businesses will be successfully integrated into Meridian’s operations. There may be risks that acquisitions may disrupt operations and may pose potential difficulties in employee retention and there may be additional risks with respect to Meridian’s ability to recognize the benefits of acquisitions, including potential synergies and cost savings or the failure of acquisitions to achieve their plans and objectives. The Company cannot predict the possible impact of recently-enacted United States healthcare legislation and any similar initiatives in other countries on its results of operations. In addition to the factors described in this paragraph, Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors contains a list and description of uncertainties, risks and other matters that may affect the Company.

 

 


Table of Contents

PART I.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements about our business and results of operations that are subject to risks and uncertainties. See “Forward Looking Statements” above. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors. In addition to the risk factors discussed herein, we are also subject to additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial. If any of these risks and uncertainties develop into actual events, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “Meridian,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or “our company” refer to Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
In the discussion that follows, all dollars and shares are in thousands (both tables and text), except per share data.
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
Overview
Meridian is a fully-integrated life science company with principal businesses in (i) the development, manufacture, sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits, primarily for certain gastrointestinal, viral, respiratory and parasitic infectious diseases; (ii) the manufacture and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and bioresearch reagents used by researchers and other diagnostic manufacturers; and (iii) the contract development and manufacture of proteins and other biologicals under cGMP conditions for use by biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines. The company was incorporated in Ohio in 1976. Our principal corporate offices are located in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Our website is www.meridianbioscience.com. We make available our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments thereto, free of charge through this website, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material has been electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These reports may also be read and copied at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549, phone number 1-800-732-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site containing these filings and other information regarding Meridian at www.sec.gov. The information on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

- 4 -


Table of Contents

Operating Segments
Our reportable operating segments are U.S. Diagnostics, European Diagnostics and Life Science. The U.S. Diagnostics operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Cincinnati, Ohio, and the sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits in the U.S. and countries outside of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The European Diagnostics operating segment consists of the sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The Life Science operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Memphis, Tennessee; Saco, Maine; Boca Raton, Florida; London, England; Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia, and the sale and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and bioresearch reagents domestically and abroad. The Life Science operating segment also includes the contract development and manufacture of proteins and other biologicals for use by biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines. Financial information for Meridian’s operating segments is included in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.
Our primary source of revenues continues to be diagnostic products, which represents 76% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2011. Our diagnostic products provide accuracy, simplicity and speed, enable early diagnosis and treatment of common, acute medical conditions, and provide for better patient outcomes at reduced costs. We target diagnostics for disease states that (i) are acute conditions where rapid diagnosis impacts patient outcomes; (ii) have opportunistic demographic and disease profiles; (iii) are underserved by current diagnostic products; and (iv) have difficult sample handling requirements. This approach has allowed us to establish significant market share in our target disease states. The acquisition of the Bioline group of companies (collectively the “Bioline Group”) in July 2010 dramatically increased the revenue base for our Life Science operating segment; revenues for our Life Science operating segment represents 24% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2011.
U.S. Diagnostics Operating Segment
Overview
Our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment’s business focuses on the development, manufacture, sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits, primarily for certain gastrointestinal, viral, respiratory and parasitic infectious diseases. In addition to diagnostic test kits, products also include transport media that store and preserve specimen samples from patient collection to laboratory testing. Third-party sales for this operating segment were $97,000, $92,000 and $99,000 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, reflecting a three-year compound annual growth rate of 3%. As of September 30, 2011, our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment had approximately 290 employees.
Our diagnostic test kits utilize immunodiagnostic and molecular technologies, which test samples of stool, blood, urine and other body fluids or tissue for the presence of specific infectious diseases. Specific immunodiagnostic technologies used in our diagnostic test kits include enzyme immunoassay, immunofluorescence, particle agglutination/aggregation, immunodiffusion, complement fixation and chemical stains. Additionally, during 2010 we introduced into the marketplace our new molecular amplification assay, illumigene® C.difficile. The illumigene® molecular amplification assay detects the presence of the toxin producing region from the C. difficile DNA, and provides highly accurate results in under an hour. During 2011, we continued with the development of additional tests for the illumigene® molecular platform, submitting illumigene® Group B Streptococcus (GBS) to the FDA for approval and we expect to add three additional tests to the platform over the next 12 months — tests for Group A Streptococcus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bordetella pertussis/ parapertussis.

 

- 5 -


Table of Contents

Our diagnostic products are used principally in the detection of gastrointestinal diseases, such as antibiotic-associated diarrhea (C. difficile), pediatric diarrhea (Rotavirus and Adenovirus) and stomach ulcers (H. pylori); foodborne diseases such as Enterohemorrhagic E. coli infection (EHEC) and Campylobacter jejuni (Campy); viral diseases, such as Mononucleosis, Herpes Simplex, Chicken Pox and Shingles (Varicella-Zoster) and Cytomegalovirus (organ transplant infections); parasitic diseases, such as Giardiasis, Cryptosporidiosis and Lyme; and respiratory diseases, such as Pneumonia, Valley Fever, Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). The primary markets and customers for these products are reference laboratories and hospitals.
Market Trends
The global market for infectious disease tests continues to expand as new disease states are identified, new therapies become available, and worldwide standards of living and access to health care improve. More importantly, within this market there is a continuing shift from conventional testing, which requires highly trained personnel and lengthy turnaround times for test results, to more technologically advanced testing, which can be performed by less highly trained personnel and completed in minutes or hours.
The increasing pressures to contain total health care costs have accelerated the increased use of diagnostic testing. With rapid and accurate diagnoses of infectious diseases, physicians can pinpoint appropriate therapies quickly, leading to faster recovery, shorter hospital stays and lower treatment expense. In addition, these pressures have led to a major consolidation among reference laboratories and the formation of multi-hospital group purchasing organizations that have reduced the number of institutional customers for diagnostic products and resulted in changes in buying practices. Specifically, multi-year exclusive or primary source marketing or distribution contracts with institutional customers have become more common, replacing less formal distribution arrangements.
Sales and Marketing
Our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment’s sales and distribution network in the U.S. consists of a direct sales force complemented by independent distributors. The use of independent distributors in the U.S. allows our products to reach any bed-size healthcare facility and also provides our customers the option to purchase our products direct or through distribution along with other supplies. For our export markets in Asia, Canada and South America, we use independent distributors. Two independent distributors in the U.S. accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009: Cardinal Healthcare Corporation and Fisher Scientific. Our sales to Cardinal were approximately $30,000, $34,000 and $38,000 during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our sales to Fisher were approximately $18,000, $18,000 and $19,000 during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

- 6 -


Table of Contents

Consolidation of the U.S. healthcare industry is expected to continue and potentially affect our customers. Industry consolidation puts pressure on pricing and aggregates buying power. In response, we have looked to multi-year supply agreements with group purchasing organizations and major reference laboratories to stabilize pricing.
Products and Markets
We have expertise in the development and manufacture of products based on multiple core diagnostic technologies, each of which enables the visualization and identification of antigen/antibody reactions for specific pathogens. Our product technologies include DNA amplification, enzyme immunoassay, immunofluorescence, particle agglutination/aggregation, immunodiffusion, complement fixation and chemical stains. As a result, we are able to develop and manufacture diagnostic tests in a variety of formats that satisfy customer needs and preferences, whether in a hospital, commercial or reference laboratory, or alternate site location. Our product offering consists of approximately 140 medical diagnostic products.
Sales within our focus product families — C. difficile, foodborne and H. pylori — accounted for 58%, 51% and 48% of our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment’s third-party sales during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These same product families accounted for 44%, 43% and 42% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Clostridium difficile
C. difficile, a serious hospital acquired bacterial infection, is our largest product family, generating approximately $30,000 in global sales for fiscal 2011, or 10% growth from fiscal 2010. This product family has experienced significant competition over the last three years from new technologies, including molecular testing platforms. Our illumigene® molecular C. difficile product has now been available in markets around the world for over 12 months. Sales of this product were approximately $9,000 and $500 in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. We have just over 650 placements of illumigene® units worldwide to date, with approximately 90% of these installed in the U.S. At the present time, it generally takes a customer 90 days from purchase order placement to become revenue producing — a timeframe we are continually working to reduce. Our illumigene® molecular C. difficile product has restored the C. difficile product family to positive sales growth and has allowed us to begin to recover lost test volume from our Toxin products.

 

- 7 -


Table of Contents

Our major competitors in this product family are Cepheid and Becton Dickinson. We believe that we have two advantages to our competition. First, our instrumentation package has a smaller footprint and significantly lower cost than those of Cepheid or Becton Dickinson, with no capital outlay required. We believe that this advantage allows our product to fit into virtually any size hospital or reference laboratory. Second, we believe that the breadth of our C. difficile product offerings represents an advantage. With the launch of our molecular product and recent FDA clearance and submission activities related to our common antigen C. difficile products — Premier C. difficile GDH received FDA clearance in May 2011, and ImmuoCard C. difficile GDH was submitted to the FDA in July 2011 — we believe we are in a unique position to offer a full line of testing solutions to our clinical laboratory customers around the world to counter the competitive pressures surrounding this market. Additionally, we hold the only FDA-approved claim for C. difficile testing in the pediatric population.
Foodborne
Our foodborne product family achieved approximately $18,000 in global sales for fiscal 2011, or growth of 36%. Our foodborne products include tests for Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and Campylobacter jejuni (Campy). Approximately 95% of our foodborne product sales are in the U.S. In the U.S. market, we believe that there are potentially 20 million annual stool cultures that make up the total available market. At present, we believe that we have a 13% market share for EHEC and a 3% market share for Campy.
We believe that the primary competition for our foodborne products is laboratory culture methods. We believe that our products have two principal advantages versus culture methods. The first principal advantage is test accuracy. Independent evaluations have shown our products to have higher sensitivity than culture methods. The second principal advantage is improved work flow of the testing process, resulting in significantly shortened time to test result. Our single-use rapid products provide a test result in approximately 20 minutes, whereas culture results can take up to 24-48 hours. Time to test result can be a critical factor in the physician’s choice of therapies, as the mortality rate for EHEC is estimated to be 5% to 10%.
Helicobacter pylori
H. pylori, a bacterium found in the stomach, is a major cause of peptic ulcers and is linked to duodenal ulcers and stomach cancer. H. pylori represents our second largest product family, generating approximately $22,000 in global sales for 2011, or 9% growth. We offer both antibody and direct antigen tests in alternative formats (single-use and high volume batch). Our major competition in this product family is test-method alternatives, such as serology and urea breath, and physicians who prescribe symptom-relieving medications without testing. In the U.S., our strategy has been to partner with managed care companies to promote the health and economic benefits of a test and treat strategy, and to move physician behavior away from serology-based testing toward direct antigen testing. In the U.S. market, we believe that there are potentially 30 million annual tests, of which we believe that we currently have a 5% market share.
In European markets, we face a greater number of competitive products for this product family. As a result, pricing pressures have led to slightly negative sales growth for fiscal 2011 for our European Diagnostics operating segment.

 

- 8 -


Table of Contents

Research and Development
Our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment’s research and development organization has expertise in biochemistry, immunology, mycology, bacteriology, virology, parasitology and molecular biology. Research and development expenses for the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $7,000, $6,000 and $7,000, respectively. This research and development organization focuses its activities on new applications for our existing technologies, improvements to existing products and development of new technologies. Research and development efforts may occur in-house or with collaborative partners. We believe that new product development is a key source for sustaining revenue growth. The products within our C. difficile, foodborne, and H. pylori product families were either developed solely in-house, or via collaboration with outside partners.
The introduction of our molecular amplification assay, illumigene® C.difficile, introduced in markets around the world over 12 months ago, followed nearly four years of exploration and development of a molecular-based diagnostic testing technology to complement our existing antigen/antibody-based testing technologies. As previously noted, the illumigene® molecular amplification assay detects the presence of a key toxin producing region from the C. difficile DNA, and provides highly accurate results in under an hour. We believe this molecular assay uniquely positions us in the market to provide a full line of testing solutions that will meet the needs of both our domestic and international customers and, as a result, during 2011 we have continued with the development of additional tests for the illumigene® molecular platform, submitting illumigene® Group B Streptococcus (GBS) to the FDA for approval and we expect to add three additional tests to the platform over the next 12 months — tests for Group A Streptococcus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis. We currently hold registrations to sell illumigene® in 37 countries, including the U.S., with registrations pending in 5 additional countries.
During fiscal 2008, we launched our first products under our patented TRU rapid test technology. The design of this technology enhances laboratory safety by containing the specimen in a closed system during testing as recommended by CDC guidelines. TRU tests also use less space than other immunoassay technologies, which is an advantage in space-constrained clinical laboratories. Products using this technology include TRU FLU®, TRU RSV®, TRU EBV-M® and TRU EBV-G®. TRU Legionella is the latest addition to the TRU line of products. Legionella was launched in ex-U.S. markets during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, and is expected to be available in the U.S. market in fiscal 2012.
Manufacturing
Our immunodiagnostic and molecular products require the production of highly specific and sensitive antigens, antibodies and primers. While we produce substantially all of our own requirements including monoclonal antibodies and polyclonal antibodies, plus a variety of fungal, bacterial and viral antigens, currently a number of the raw materials used in our illumigene® molecular product are purchased from outside vendors. We believe that we have sufficient manufacturing and sourcing capacity for anticipated growth in the near term.

 

- 9 -


Table of Contents

Intellectual Property, Patents and Licenses
We own or license U.S. and foreign patents, most of which are for products manufactured by our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment. Sales of these products are as follows:
                         
    Number of        
Product Family   products     % of consolidated sales  
          2011     2010  
C. difficile
    1       6 %     0 %
H. pylori
    2       13 %     13 %
Respiratory
    2       2 %     4 %
Other
    6       1 %     2 %
 
                 
Total patented products
    11       22 %     19 %
 
                 
The patent for the C. difficile product expires in 2020; the patents for the two H. pylori products expire between 2016 and 2017; and the patents for the two respiratory products expire in 2022 and 2027. The remaining six patented products for which we own or license patents are spread over three product families.
In the absence of patent protection, we may be vulnerable to competitors who successfully replicate our production and manufacturing technologies and processes. Our employees are required to execute confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements designed to protect our proprietary products.
Government Regulation
Our diagnostic products are regulated by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) as “devices” pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). Under the FDCA, medical devices are classified into one of three classes (i.e., Class I, II or III). Class I and II devices are not expressly approved by the FDA, but, instead, are “cleared” for marketing. Class III devices generally must receive “pre-market approval” from the FDA as to safety and effectiveness.
Each of the diagnostic products currently marketed by us in the United States has been cleared by the FDA pursuant to the 510(k) clearance process or is exempt from such requirements. We believe that most, but not all, products under development will be classified as Class I or II medical devices and, in the case of Class II devices, will be eligible for 510(k) clearance; however, we can make no assurances in this regard.
Sales of our diagnostic products in foreign countries are subject to foreign government regulation, the requirements of which vary substantially from country to country. The time required to obtain approval by a foreign country may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval and the requirements may differ.
Meridian’s Cincinnati manufacturing facility is certified to ISO 13485.
Seasonal Factors and Sporadic Outbreaks
Our principal business is the sale of a broad range of diagnostic test kits for common gastrointestinal, viral, upper respiratory and parasitic infectious diseases. Certain infectious diseases may be seasonal in nature, while others may be associated with sporadic outbreaks, such as foodborne illnesses, or pandemics such as H1N1 influenza. While we believe that the breadth of our diagnostic product lines reduces the risk that infections subject to seasonality and sporadic outbreaks will cause significant variability in diagnostic revenues, we can make no assurance that revenues will not be impacted period over period by such factors.

 

- 10 -


Table of Contents

European Diagnostics Operating Segment
Our European Diagnostics operating segment’s business focuses on the sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits, manufactured both by our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment and by third-party vendors. Approximately 66% of third-party sales for fiscal 2011 for this operating segment were products purchased from our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment. Third-party sales for this operating segment were approximately $24,000, $24,000 and $26,000 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, the European Diagnostics operating segment had approximately 40 employees. Our European Diagnostics operating segment’s sales and distribution network consists of direct sales forces in Belgium, France, Holland and Italy, and independent distributors in other European countries, Africa and the Middle East. The European Diagnostics operating segment maintains a distribution center near Milan, Italy. The primary markets and customers for this operating segment are hospitals and reference laboratories.
The European Diagnostics operating segment’s functional currency is the Euro. The translation of Euros into U.S. dollars is subject to exchange rate fluctuations.
Life Science Operating Segment
Overview
Our Life Science operating segment’s business focuses on the development, manufacture, sale and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and bioresearch reagents used by researchers and other diagnostic companies, as well as contract development and manufacturing services under clinical cGMP conditions. Third-party sales for this operating segment were approximately $38,000, $27,000 and $23,000 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, our Life Science operating segment had approximately 195 employees.
Most of the revenue for our Life Science operating segment currently comes from the manufacture, sale and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and bioresearch reagents used by researchers and other diagnostic companies. During fiscal 2011, 15% of third-party sales for this segment were to two customers. For one of these two customers, we have exclusive supply agreements that have annual, automatic renewal provisions. We have a long-standing relationship with this customer; and although there can be no assurances, we intend to renew these supply agreements in the normal course of business.

 

- 11 -


Table of Contents

In July 2010, we acquired the Bioline Group and in so doing added important technologies and capabilities to our Life Science business and complemented our expanding life science product lines sold into the research, pharmaceutical and commercial diagnostic markets. In addition to technological capabilities, Bioline also added proprietary know-how in the production of high-volume nucleotides and PCR enzymes, as well as a growing portfolio of intellectual property in the form of patents and licenses. The Bioline Group contributed sales of approximately $15,000 and $2,000 in fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively.
Our clinical cGMP protein production facility in Memphis, Tennessee serves as an enabling technology for process development and large-scale manufacturing for biologicals used in new drugs and vaccines. The size of the facility is intended to accommodate manufacturing requirements for Phase I and Phase II clinical trials. The customer base for this aspect of our Life Science business includes biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as government agencies, such as the National Institutes of Health. Revenues for our Life Science operating segment, in the normal course of business, may be affected from quarter to quarter by the timing and nature of arrangements for contract services work, which may have longer production cycles than our immunodiagnostic and molecular biology products, as well as buying patterns of major customers. See Note 1 (i) to the Consolidated Financial Statements herein for revenue recognition policies. Our revenues for contract services were approximately $3,000, $2,000 and $2,000 in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
As a result of the order volume trends in bulk antigens, antibodies and reagents, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we announced the closure of our Saco, Maine facility, and began the transfer of our manufacturing operations from this facility to our Memphis, Tennessee facility. We expect the consolidation of manufacturing operations in Memphis will provide a lower overall cost structure and should be completed during the second fiscal quarter of 2012. Total costs to complete the consolidation of facilities are expected to be approximately $2,200, consisting of fixed asset impairments, inventory impairments, stay bonuses and moving costs, among other similar items. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we recognized $1,057 of these costs, and the balance will be recognized during fiscal 2012, primarily during the first half of the fiscal year.
Products, Markets and Growth Strategies
Our Life Science operating segment’s businesses have been assembled via acquisitions (BIODESIGN International in fiscal 1999, Viral Antigens in fiscal 2000, OEM Concepts in fiscal 2005, and the Bioline Group in July 2010). Historically, these businesses were run autonomously. In recent years, growth strategies have been developed around sales and marketing integration, new product development integration, and the acquisition of complementary product lines.

 

- 12 -


Table of Contents

Immunodiagnostic products such as antibodies, antigens and reagents are marketed primarily to diagnostic manufacturing customers as a source of raw materials for their products, or as an outsourced step in their manufacturing processes. These products are typically sold in bulk quantities, and may also be custom-designed for a particular manufacturer’s requirements. Sales efforts are focused on multi-year supply agreements in order to provide stability in volumes and pricing. We believe this benefits both us and our customers.
Molecular biology products such as PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides and competent cells are marketed primarily to research customers. These products are typically sold in small quantities.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses for our Life Science operating segment for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $3,000, $2,000 and $1,000, respectively. This research and development organization is heavily involved in vaccine development and production activities for our cGMP facility.
Manufacturing and Government Regulation
The cGMP clinical grade proteins that are produced in our Memphis facility are intended to be used as “injectibles,” and, as such, they are produced under cGMP Regulations for Biologics and Human Drugs under the auspices of the FDA. Approval and licensing, following clinical trials, of these products is the responsibility of the applicant, who owns the rights to each protein. Typically, the customer is the applicant, not Meridian Life Science.
The Meridian Life Science facilities are ISO 9001:2008 certified and EC 1069:2009 approved, where appropriate and as required.
Competition
Diagnostics
The market for diagnostic tests is a multi-billion dollar international industry, which is highly competitive. Many of our competitors are larger than we are with greater financial, research, manufacturing and marketing resources. Important competitive factors for Meridian’s products include product quality, price, ease of use, customer service and reputation. In a broader sense, industry competition is based upon scientific and technological capability, proprietary know-how, access to adequate capital, the ability to develop and market products and processes, the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, and the availability of patent protection. To the extent that our product lines do not reflect technological advances, our ability to compete in those product lines could be adversely affected.
The diagnostic test industry is highly fragmented and segmented. Of importance in the industry are mid-sized medical diagnostic specialty companies, like Meridian, that offer multiple, broad product lines and have the ability to deliver new, high value products quickly to the marketplace. Among the companies with which we compete in the marketing of one or more of our products are the diagnostic product divisions of Abbott Laboratories Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company, Thermo Fisher and Siemens. We also compete with smaller companies such as Cepheid, Quidel Corporation and Alere, Inc.

 

- 13 -


Table of Contents

Life Science
The market for bulk biomedical reagents is highly competitive. Important competitive factors include product quality, price, customer service, and reputation. We face competitors, many of which have greater financial, research and development, sales and marketing, and manufacturing resources, and where sole-source supply arrangements do not exist. From time to time, customers may choose to manufacture their biomedical reagents in-house rather than purchase from outside vendors such as Meridian.
The market for contract manufacturing in a validated cGMP facility, such as our Memphis facility, is also competitive. Important competitive factors include reputation, customer service and price. Although the product application for this facility was built from our existing expertise in cell culture manufacturing techniques, we face competitors with greater experience in contract manufacturing in a clinical cGMP environment.
Acquisitions
Acquisitions have played an important role in the growth of our businesses. Our acquisition objectives include, among other things, (i) enhancing product offerings; (ii) improving product distribution capabilities; (iii) providing access to new markets; and/or (iv) providing access to key biologicals or new technologies that lead to new products. Although we cannot provide any assurance that we will consummate any additional acquisitions in the future, nor can we provide any assurance that any acquisitions will accomplish these objectives, we expect that the potential for acquisitions will continue to provide opportunities for revenues and earnings growth in the future.
International Markets
International markets are an important source of revenue and future growth opportunities for all of our operating segments. For all operating segments combined, international sales were approximately $53,000 or 33% of consolidated fiscal 2011 sales, $43,000 or 30% of consolidated fiscal 2010 sales and $41,000 or 28% of consolidated fiscal 2009 sales. We expect to continue to look to international markets as a source of new revenues and growth in the future. See Notes 7 and 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information concerning sales, long-lived assets and deferred tax assets by country.
Environmental
We are a conditionally exempt, small quantity generator of hazardous waste and have a U.S. EPA identification number. We are in compliance with applicable portions of the federal and state hazardous waste regulations and have never been a party to any environmental proceeding.

 

- 14 -


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the following factors, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, cash flows or future results. Any one of these factors could cause our actual results to vary materially from recent results or from anticipated future results. The risks described below are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Risks Affecting Growth and Profitability of our Business
We may be unable to develop new products and services or acquire products and services on favorable terms.
The medical diagnostic and life science industries are characterized by ongoing technological developments and changing customer requirements. As such, our results of operations and continued growth depend, in part, on our ability in a timely manner to develop or acquire rights to, and successfully introduce into the marketplace, enhancements of existing products and services or new products and services that incorporate technological advances, meet customer requirements and respond to products developed by our competition. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be successful in developing or acquiring such rights to products and services on a timely basis, or that such products and services will adequately address the changing needs of the marketplace, either of which could adversely affect our results of operations.
In addition, we must regularly allocate considerable resources to research and development of new products, services and technologies. The research and development process generally takes a significant amount of time from design stage to product launch. This process is conducted in various stages. During each stage, there is a risk that we will not achieve our goals on a timely basis, or at all, and we may have to abandon a product in which we have invested substantial resources.
We may be unable to successfully integrate operations or to achieve expected cost savings from acquisitions we make.
One of our main growth strategies is the acquisition of companies and/or products. Although additional acquisitions of companies and products may enhance the opportunity to increase net earnings over time, such acquisitions could result in greater administrative burdens, increased exposure to the uncertainties inherent in marketing new products and financial risks of additional operating costs. The principal benefits expected to result from any acquisitions we make will not be achieved fully unless we are able to successfully integrate the operations of the acquired entities with our operations and realize the anticipated synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities from integrating these businesses into our existing businesses. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to identify and complete additional acquisitions on terms we consider favorable or that, if completed, will be successfully integrated into our operations.

 

- 15 -


Table of Contents

Revenues for our diagnostic operating segments may be impacted by our reliance upon two key distributors, seasonal factors and sporadic outbreaks, and changing diagnostic market conditions.
Key Distributors
Our U.S. Diagnostic operating segment’s sales through two distributors were 49% and 57%, respectively, of the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment’s total sales for fiscal 2011 and 2010, or 30% and 36%, respectively, of our consolidated sales for fiscal 2011 and 2010. These parties distribute our products and other laboratory products to end-user customers. The loss of either of these distributors could negatively impact our sales and results of operations unless suitable alternatives were timely found or lost sales to one distributor were absorbed by another distributor. Finding a suitable alternative on satisfactory terms may pose challenges in our industry’s competitive environment. As an alternative, we could expand our efforts to distribute and market our products directly. This alternative, however, would require substantial investment in additional sales, marketing and logistics resources, including hiring additional sales and customer service personnel, which would significantly increase our future selling, general and administrative expenses.
In addition, buying patterns of these two distributors may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, potentially leading to uneven concentration levels on a quarterly basis.
Seasonal Factors and Sporadic Outbreaks
Our principal business is the sale of a broad range of diagnostic test kits for common gastrointestinal, viral, upper respiratory and parasitic infectious diseases. Certain infectious diseases may be seasonal in nature, while others may be associated with sporadic outbreaks, such as foodborne illnesses, or pandemics such as H1N1 influenza. While we believe that the breadth of our diagnostic product lines reduces the risk that infections subject to seasonality and sporadic outbreaks will cause significant variability in diagnostic revenues, we can make no assurance that revenues will not be negatively impacted period over period by such factors.
Changing Diagnostic Market Conditions
Changes in the healthcare delivery system have resulted in major consolidation among reference laboratories and in the formation of multi-hospital alliances, reducing the number of institutional customers for diagnostic test products. Consolidation in the U.S. healthcare industry has also led to the creation of group purchasing organizations (GPOs) that aggregate buying power for hospital groups and put pressure on our selling prices. Due to such consolidation, we may not be able to enter into and/or sustain contractual or other marketing or distribution arrangements on a satisfactory commercial basis with institutional customers and GPOs, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

- 16 -


Table of Contents

We could be adversely affected by healthcare reform legislation.
Third-party payers for medical products and services, including state and federal governments, are increasingly concerned about escalating health care costs and can indirectly affect the pricing or the relative attractiveness of our products by regulating the maximum amount of reimbursement they will provide for diagnostic testing services. Following years of increasing pressure, during 2010 the U.S. government enacted comprehensive healthcare reform. At present, given the infancy of the enacted reform, we are unable to predict what effect the legislation might ultimately have on reimbursement rates for our products. If reimbursement amounts for diagnostic testing services are decreased in the future, such decreases may reduce the amount that will be reimbursed to hospitals or physicians for such services and consequently could place constraints on the levels of overall pricing, which could have a material effect on our sales and/or results of operations.
In addition, this legislation established a 2.3% excise tax on the sales of medical devices beginning in 2013. At existing sales levels in our U.S. markets, this would result in an annual excise tax in excess of $2,000 for our company. It is unknown at the present time whether this cost can be passed on to customers.
Revenues for our Life Science operating segment may be impacted by customer concentrations and buying patterns.
Our Life Science operating segment’s sales of purified antigens and reagents to two customers were 15% and 27%, respectively, of the Life Science operating segment’s total sales for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, or 4% and 5%, respectively, of our consolidated sales for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010. For one of these two customers, we have exclusive supply agreements that have annual, automatic renewal provisions. Although we have a long-standing relationship with this customer, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to renew these supply agreements, which could adversely affect our sales and results of operations.
Our Life Science operating segment has four other significant customers who purchase antigens, antibodies and reagents, which together comprised 10% and 13%, respectively, of the operating segment’s total sales for fiscal 2011 and 2010. Any significant alteration of buying patterns from these customers could adversely affect our period over period sales and results of operations.
Revenues relating to research, development and manufacturing services for our Life Science operating segment are generated on a contract by contract basis. The nature of this business is such that each contract provides a unique product and/or service and corresponding revenue stream. Although we believe that future prospects for this business will generate targeted growth rates, there can be no assurance that future contracts will be secured, and if secured, will be profitable.

 

- 17 -


Table of Contents

Intense competition could adversely affect our profitability.
The markets for our products and services are characterized by substantial competition and rapid change. Hundreds of companies in the United States supply immunodiagnostic tests and purified reagents. These companies range from multinational healthcare entities, for which immunodiagnostics is one line of business, to small start-up companies. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do. We cannot provide any assurance that our products and services will be able to compete successfully with the products and services of our competitors.
In recent years, molecular tests have been introduced for the first time into the C. difficile market, which is a significant source of revenues for us. Our ability to continue to successfully compete in the C. difficile market is partly dependent upon the success and market acceptance of our own molecular-based product, illumigene® C. difficile.
We depend on international sales, and our financial results may be adversely impacted by foreign currency, regulatory or other developments affecting international markets.
We sell products and services into approximately 60 countries. Approximately 33% of our net sales for fiscal 2011 and approximately 30% of our net sales for fiscal 2010 were attributable to international markets. For fiscal 2011, 43% of our international sales were made in Euros and 40% were made in U.S. dollars, with the remaining 17% being a combination of the British pound and the Australian dollar. We are subject to the risks associated with fluctuations in the exchange rates for the Australian dollar, British pound and Euro to the U.S. dollar. We are also subject to other risks associated with international operations, including longer customer payment cycles, tariff regulations, requirements for export licenses, instability of foreign governments, and governmental requirements with respect to the importation and distribution of medical devices and immunodiagnostic and molecular biology reagents, all of which may vary by country.
Risks Affecting our Manufacturing Operations
We are subject to comprehensive regulation, and our ability to earn profits may be restricted by these regulations.
Medical device diagnostics and the manufacture, sale and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies and reagents are highly regulated industries. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to obtain necessary governmental clearances or approvals or timely clearances or approvals to market future products in the United States and other countries. Costs and difficulties in complying with laws and regulations administered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, the Centers for Disease Control or other regulators can result in unanticipated expenses and delays and interruptions to the sale of new and existing products. Contract manufacturing of proteins and other biologicals is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Regulatory approval can be a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process, making the timing and costs of approvals difficult to predict. The failure to comply with these regulations can result in delay in obtaining authorization to sell products, seizure or recall of products, suspension or revocation of authority to manufacture or sell products, and other civil or criminal sanctions.

 

- 18 -


Table of Contents

Significant interruptions in production at our principal manufacturing facilities and/or third-party manufacturing facilities would adversely affect our business and operating results.
Products and services manufactured at our Cincinnati, Ohio; Boca Raton, Florida; Memphis, Tennessee; Saco, Maine; London, England; Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia facilities comprised 73% of our Diagnostics revenues and 82% of our Life Science revenues. Our global supply of these products and services is dependent on the uninterrupted and efficient operation of these facilities. In addition, we currently rely on a small number of third-party manufacturers to produce certain of our diagnostic products and product components. The operations of our facilities or these third-party manufacturing facilities could be adversely affected by power failures, natural or other disasters, such as earthquakes, floods, tornadoes or terrorist threats. Although we carry insurance to protect against certain business interruptions at our facilities, there can be no assurance that such coverage will be adequate or that such coverage will continue to remain available on acceptable terms, if at all. Any significant interruption in the Company’s or third-party manufacturing capabilities could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
We depend on sole-source suppliers for certain critical components and products. A supply interruption could adversely affect our business.
Our products are made from a wide variety of raw materials that are generally available from multiple sources of supply. However, certain critical raw materials and supplies required for the production of some of our principal products are available only from a single supplier. In addition, certain finished products, for which we act as a distributor, are available only from a single supplier. If these suppliers become unable or unwilling to supply the required raw materials or products, we would need to find another source, and perform additional development work and obtain regulatory approvals for the use of the alternative raw materials for our products. Completing that development and obtaining such approvals could require significant time and resources, and may not occur at all. Any disruption in the supply of these raw materials or finished products could have a material adverse affect on us.
We currently sole-source from a U.S. manufacturer the illumipro-10® instrument on which our illumigene® molecular testing platform operates. Additionally, two of our foodborne products sourced from another vendor accounted for 14%, 11% and 7% of third-party sales for our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

- 19 -


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Intellectual Property and Product Liability
We may be unable to protect or obtain proprietary rights that we utilize or intend to utilize.
In developing and manufacturing our products, we employ a variety of proprietary and patented technologies. In addition, we have licensed, and expect to continue to license, various complementary technologies and methods from academic institutions and public and private companies. We cannot provide any assurance that the technologies that we own or license provide protection from competitive threats or from challenges to our intellectual property. In addition, we cannot provide any assurances that we will be successful in obtaining licenses or proprietary or patented technologies in the future.
Product infringement claims by other companies could result in costly disputes and could limit our ability to sell our products.
Litigation over intellectual property rights is prevalent in the diagnostic industry. As the market for diagnostics continues to grow and the number of participants in the market increases, we may increasingly be subject to patent infringement claims. It is possible that a third-party may claim infringement against us. If found to infringe, we may attempt to obtain a license to such intellectual property; however, we may be unable to do so on favorable terms, or at all. Additionally, if our products are found to infringe on third-party intellectual property, we may be required to pay damages for past infringement and lose the ability to sell certain products, causing our revenues to decrease. We currently carry intellectual property insurance that covers damages and defense costs from our potential infringement on other third-party patents at levels that we believe are commercially reasonable, although there is no assurance that it will be adequate to cover claims that may arise. Any substantial underinsured loss resulting from such a claim could have a material adverse affect on our profitability and the damage to our reputation in the industry could have a material adverse affect on our business.
If product liability lawsuits are successfully brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities and may have to limit or cease sales of our products.
The testing, manufacturing and marketing of medical diagnostic products involves an inherent risk of product liability claims. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit or cease sales of our products. We currently carry product liability insurance at a level we believe is commercially reasonable, although there is no assurance that it will be adequate to cover claims that may arise. In certain customer contracts, we indemnify third parties for certain product liability claims related to our products. These indemnification obligations may cause us to pay significant sums of money for claims that are covered by these indemnifications. In addition, a defect in the design or manufacture of our products could have a material adverse affect on our reputation in the industry and subject us to claims of liability for injury and otherwise. Any substantial underinsured loss resulting from such a claim could have a material adverse affect on our profitability and the damage to our reputation in the industry could have a material adverse affect on our business.

 

- 20 -


Table of Contents

Other Risks Affecting Our Business
Our business could be negatively affected if we are unable to attract, hire and retain key personnel.
Our future success depends on our continued ability to attract, hire and retain highly qualified personnel, including our executive officers and scientific, technical, sales and marketing employees, and their ability to manage growth successfully. If such key employees were to leave and we were unable to obtain adequate replacements, our operating results could be adversely affected.
Our bank credit agreement imposes restrictions with respect to our operations.
Our bank credit agreement contains a number of financial covenants that require us to meet certain financial ratios and tests. If we fail to comply with the obligations in the credit agreement, we would be in default under the credit agreement. If an event of default is not cured or waived, it could result in acceleration of any indebtedness under our credit agreement, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. At the present time, no borrowings are outstanding under our bank credit agreement.
We face risks related to global economic conditions.
We currently generate significant operating cash flows, which combined with access to the credit markets provides us with discretionary funding capacity for research and development and other strategic activities. Current uncertainty in global economic conditions poses a risk to the overall economy that could impact demand for our products, as well as our ability to manage normal commercial relationships with our customers, suppliers and creditors, including financial institutions. If global economic conditions deteriorate significantly, our business could be negatively impacted, including such areas as reduced demand for our products from a slow-down in the general economy, supplier or customer disruptions resulting from tighter credit markets and/or temporary interruptions in our ability to conduct day-to-day transactions through our financial intermediaries involving the payment to or collection of funds from our customers, vendors and suppliers.
Approximately $4,900 of our accounts receivable at September 30, 2011 is due from Italian hospital customers whose funding ultimately comes from the Italian government. The magnitude of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, and Italy in particular, is significant. We have experienced a deterioration in the aging of our Italian accounts receivable and continue to monitor the situation closely.

 

- 21 -


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 1,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock and to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of such shares without any future vote or action by the shareholders. The issuance of preferred stock under certain circumstances could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company. Ohio corporation law contains provisions that may discourage takeover bids for our company that have not been negotiated with the board of directors. Such provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. In addition, sales of substantial amounts of such shares in the public market could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise additional capital at a price favorable to us.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

 

- 22 -


Table of Contents

ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
Our corporate offices, U.S. Diagnostics manufacturing facility and U.S. Diagnostics research and development facility are located in four buildings totaling approximately 114,000 square feet on 10 acres of land in the Village of Newtown, a suburb of Cincinnati, Ohio. These properties are owned by us. We have approximately 39,000 square feet of manufacturing space and 14,000 square feet of warehouse space in these facilities. Included within these properties is an approximately 21,000 square foot building located on 3.5 acres of land within one mile of our primary headquarters facility. Since purchasing this property in September 2009, we have transformed the property into a state-of-the-art facility, which as of July 2011 houses our research and development operations and our sales and marketing departments. The facility is called the Meridian Innovation Center and was designed to stimulate our product development and marketing efforts.
Our European Diagnostics distribution center in Italy conducts its operations in a two-story building near Milan, consisting of approximately 18,000 square feet. This facility is owned by our wholly-owned Italian subsidiary, Meridian Bioscience Europe s.r.l. We also rent office space in Nice, France; Paris, France; and Nivelles, Belgium for sales and administrative functions.
Our Life Science operations are conducted in several facilities in Saco, Maine; Memphis, Tennessee; and Boca Raton, Florida, as well as the Bioline Group facilities located in Boston, Massachusetts; London, England; Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia. Our facility in Memphis, Tennessee consists of two buildings totaling approximately 44,000 square feet, including approximately 27,000 square feet of manufacturing space, and is owned by us. Our leased facility in Boca Raton, Florida contains approximately 7,500 square feet of manufacturing space. Our facility in Saco, Maine, the operations of which we are in the process of consolidating with the Memphis facility, contains approximately 23,000 square feet for manufacturing, sales, distribution and administrative functions. In anticipation of the consolidation of the Maine operations with the Tennessee location being completed during the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we are marketing the property for sale or lease. Following are details of the Bioline Group facilities, all of which are leased: Boston — approximately 10,000 square feet of sales and warehouse space; London — approximately 9,000 square feet of sales, warehouse, distribution, research and development, manufacturing and administrative office space; Luckenwalde — approximately 9,000 square feet of sales, warehouse and manufacturing space; Sydney — approximately 3,000 square feet of sales, warehouse, research and development and manufacturing space.

 

- 23 -


Table of Contents

ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to various litigation matters that we believe are in the normal course of business. The ultimate resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. No material provision has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for these matters.
ITEM 4.
[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
PART II.
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON
EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Refer to “Forward Looking Statements” following the Index in front of the Form 10-K and Item 1A “Risk Factors” on Pages 15 through 22 of this Annual Report.
“Common Stock Information” on the inside back cover of the Annual Report to Shareholders for 2011 and “Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)” relating to our dividends in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements are incorporated herein by reference. Except as may otherwise be prohibited by applicable law, there are no restrictions on cash dividend payments.
Historically, our cash dividend policy has been to set the indicated annual dividend rate between 75% and 85% of each fiscal year’s expected net earnings. However, during each of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, years of significant investment in our foundation for the future (e.g., illumigene® molecular technology development/launch, ongoing development of new products for the molecular platform, Bioline Group acquisition, etc.), our indicated annual dividend rate of $0.76 per share was 117% of diluted earnings per share. Based upon published fiscal 2012 earnings guidance, management expects the annual indicated dividend to be between approximately 85% and 89% of fiscal 2012 diluted earnings per share, although no assurances can be made in this regard. The declaration and amount of dividends will be determined by the Board of Directors in its discretion based upon its evaluation of earnings, cash flow requirements and future business developments and opportunities, including acquisitions.
We paid dividends of $0.76 per share, $0.74 per share and $0.65 per share in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, there were approximately 1,000 holders of record and approximately 18,100 beneficial owners of our common shares.

 

- 24 -


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Incorporated by reference from inside front cover of the Annual Report to Shareholders for 2011.
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Refer to “Forward Looking Statements” following the Index in front of this Form 10-K and Item 1A “Risk Factors” on pages 15 through 22 of this Annual Report.
In the discussion that follows, all amounts are in thousands (both tables and text), except per share data.
Results of Operations:
Fourth Quarter
Net earnings for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 increased 26% to $6,710, or $0.16 per diluted share, from net earnings for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 of $5,322, or $0.13 per diluted share. This increase reflects the combined effects of both increased sales and increased operating expenses, in large part resulting from the Bioline Group, which was acquired on July 20, 2010. Additionally, the fiscal 2011 fourth quarter includes $1,057 of costs associated with the consolidation of the Saco, Maine operations into the Memphis, Tennessee facility (impact on net earnings of $691, or $0.02 per diluted share). Sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 were $41,349, an increase of $5,810, or 16%, compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, reflecting the impact of a full quarter of Bioline Group sales and increased sales across all of our diagnostic focus product families: C. difficile, Foodborne and H. pylori.
Sales for the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 increased 14% compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, reflecting growth across all of our focus product families — ranging from 12% growth in H. pylori products to 29% growth in our C. difficile product family. Fourth quarter 2011 sales for our European Diagnostics operating segment increased 7% compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 due primarily to a positive currency effect. On an organic basis, which excludes the effects of currency translation, sales for our European Diagnostics operating segment decreased 4% during the fourth quarter, reflecting the ongoing effects of significant competitive pressures in the C. difficile and H. pylori product families. Largely as a result of the Bioline Group, sales for our Life Science segment experienced a 27% increase in sales during this period. Excluding the effect of the Bioline Group, sales of our Life Science operating segment increased by 8% during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

 

- 25 -


Table of Contents

Fiscal Year
Net earnings for fiscal 2011 increased 1% to $26,831, or $0.65 per diluted share, from net earnings for fiscal 2010 of $26,647, or $0.65 per diluted share. Fiscal 2011 net earnings includes $691 ($1,057 excluding the income tax effect), or $0.02 per diluted share, associated with the consolidation of the Saco, Maine operations into the Memphis, Tennessee facility, and $872 ($1,240 excluding the income tax effect), or $0.02 per diluted share, related to costs incurred in connection with the reorganization of our sales and marketing leadership during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Fiscal 2010 net earnings, on the other hand, includes $1,240, or $0.03 per diluted share, of Bioline Group transaction costs. Results of operations for fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 are discussed below.
Non-GAAP Information
The tables below provide information on net earnings, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share, excluding the effect of costs associated with the consolidation of our Saco, Maine operations into our Memphis, Tennessee facility (fiscal 2011), costs of reorganizing our sales and marketing leadership (fiscal 2011) and transaction costs associated with the acquisition of the Bioline Group (fiscal 2010), each of which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as well as reconciliations to amounts reported under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We believe that this information is useful to those who read our financial statements and evaluate our operating results because:
1.  
These measures help to appropriately evaluate and compare the results of operations from period to period by removing the impact of non-routine costs related to consolidating the Maine operations (fiscal 2011) and reorganizing our sales and marketing leadership (fiscal 2011), and the one-time transaction costs related to the acquisition of the Bioline Group (fiscal 2010); and
2.  
These measures are used by our management for various purposes, including evaluating performance against incentive bonus achievement targets, comparing performance from period to period in presentations to our Board of Directors, and as a basis for strategic planning and forecasting.

 

- 26 -


Table of Contents

                         
    2011     2010     2009  
Net Earnings -
                       
U.S. GAAP basis
  $ 26,831     $ 26,647     $ 32,759  
Sales & Marketing Leadership Reorganization (1)
    872              
Facility consolidation costs (1)
    691              
Transaction costs for Bioline Group acquisition (2)
          1,240        
 
                 
Adjusted earnings
  $ 28,394     $ 27,887     $ 32,759  
 
                 
 
                       
Net Earnings per Basic Common Share -
                       
U.S. GAAP basis
  $ 0.66     $ 0.66     $ 0.81  
Sales & Marketing Leadership Reorganization (1)
    0.02              
Facility consolidation costs (1)
    0.02              
Transaction costs for Bioline Group acquisition (2)
          0.03        
 
                 
Adjusted Basic EPS
  $ 0.70     $ 0.69     $ 0.81  
 
                 
 
                       
Net Earnings per Diluted Common Share -
                       
U.S. GAAP basis
  $ 0.65     $ 0.65     $ 0.80  
Sales & Marketing Leadership Reorganization (1)
    0.02              
Facility consolidation costs (1)
    0.02                  
Transaction costs for Bioline Group acquisition (2)
          0.03        
 
                 
Adjusted Diluted EPS
  $ 0.69     $ 0.68     $ 0.80  
 
                 
     
(1)  
These amounts are net of income tax effects of $368 and $366 for the leadership reorganization and the facility consolidation costs, respectively, which were calculated using the effective tax rates of the jurisdictions in which the costs were incurred.
 
(2)  
Since the Bioline Group transaction costs were not deductible, there are no income tax effects.
Revenue Overview:
Our Diagnostics operating segments provide the largest share of our consolidated revenues, 76%, 81% and 84% for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The percentage decline from fiscal 2010 to 2011 results primarily from the addition of the Bioline Group to our Life Science operating segment. Sales from our focus families (C. difficile, Foodborne and H. pylori) comprised 58% of our Diagnostics operating segments’ revenues during fiscal 2011.
The overall revenue change for our Diagnostics operating segments during fiscal 2011 was an increase of 5%, reflecting growth in all of our focus product families. The levels of growth ranged from 9% in our H. pylori products to 36% in our foodborne products family. C. difficile revenue, which had declined 18% and 2% in 2010 and 2009, respectively, increased 10% in fiscal 2011. Respiratory product sales declined 26% as a result of the end of the H1N1 influenza pandemic in December 2009. However, sales of non-influenza respiratory products declined only 1%. On an organic basis, which excludes the effects of currency translation, sales of our European Diagnostic operating segment decreased by 2% in fiscal 2011, reflecting the combined effects of decreases in our C. difficile, respiratory and H. pylori product families, partially offset by growth in our foodborne product sales.

 

- 27 -


Table of Contents

C. difficile Products
Our illumigene® molecular C. difficile product has now been available in markets around the world for over 12 months. Sales of this product were approximately $9,000 and $500 in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. We have just over 650 placements of illumigene® units worldwide to date, with approximately 90% of these installed in the U.S. At the present time, it generally takes a customer 90 days from purchase order placement to become revenue producing — a timeframe we are continually working to reduce. Our illumigene® molecular C. difficile product has restored the C. difficile product family to positive sales growth, 10% in fiscal 2011, and has allowed us to begin to recover lost test volume from our Toxin products.
Our major competitors in this product family are Cepheid and Becton Dickinson. We believe that we have two principal advantages versus our competition. First, our instrumentation package has a smaller footprint and significantly lower cost than either Cepheid or Becton Dickinson. We believe that this advantage allows our product to fit into virtually any size hospital or reference laboratory. We believe that our second principal advantage is the breadth of our C. difficile product offerings. With the launch of our molecular product and recent FDA clearance and submission activities related to our common antigen C. difficile products — Premier C. difficile GDH received FDA clearance in May 2011, and ImmunoCard C. difficile GDH was submitted to the FDA in July 2011 — we believe we are in a unique position to offer a full line of testing solutions to our clinical laboratory customers around the world to counter the competitive pressures surrounding this market. Additionally, we hold the only FDA-approved claim for C. difficile testing in the pediatric population. During July, we submitted to the FDA our second molecular test for the illumigene® molecular platform, illumigene® Group B Streptococcus (GBS), and over the next 12 months, we expect the following additional tests for the platform — Group A Streptococcus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis — to clear formal clinical trials and be submitted to the FDA for marketing clearance.
Foodborne Products
During fiscal 2011, sales of our foodborne products increased approximately 35% for our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment and approximately 39% for our European Diagnostics operating segment on an organic basis. As was experienced in fiscal 2010, the revenue increases in this product family continue to reflect the volume growth in our new foodborne products launched in recent years. Additionally, the European Diagnostics operating segment’s growth reflects the effects of the Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) infection outbreak in Europe during the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The market acceptance and volume growth of these products has resulted in global revenues for this disease family growing nearly five-fold since fiscal 2007, with foodborne fast approaching a $20,000 product family.
We believe that the primary competition for our foodborne products is laboratory culture methods. We believe that our products have two principal advantages versus culture methods. The first principal advantage is test accuracy. Independent evaluations have shown our products to have higher sensitivity than culture methods. The second principal advantage is improved work flow of the testing process, resulting in significantly shortened time to test result. Our single-use rapid products provide a test result in approximately 20 minutes, whereas culture results can take up to 24-48 hours. Time to test result can be a critical factor in the physician’s choice of therapies.

 

- 28 -


Table of Contents

H. pylori Products
During fiscal 2011, sales of our H. pylori products grew 14% for our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment and declined 3% for our European Diagnostics operating segment on an organic basis, compared to the year-over-year sales level increases these operating segments experienced in 2010 of 15% and 1%, respectively. The increases for our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment continue to reflect the benefits of our partnerships with managed care companies in promoting the health and economic benefits of a test and treat strategy, and the ongoing effects of such strategy moving physician behavior away from serology-based testing toward direct antigen testing. We expect that our efforts with managed care companies in the U.S. will provide low to mid-teens growth opportunities for the next several years. The sales results for our European Diagnostics operating segment reflect the ongoing impact of pricing pressures from competitive products in European markets.
Respiratory Products
During fiscal 2011, respiratory sales for our Diagnostics operating segments decreased 26% compared to fiscal 2010, following a 25% year-over-year decrease from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010. The dramatic sales fluctuation for this family is a direct result of the end of the novel A (H1N1) outbreak in December 2009. Total non-influenza respiratory product sales remained relatively flat compared to fiscal 2010, with sales of such products decreasing 3% for our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment and increasing 10% for our European Diagnostics operating segment on an organic basis. At present, we do not expect a significant revenue contribution from influenza products in fiscal 2012.
Group Purchasing Organizations
In our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment, consolidation of the U.S. healthcare industry over the last several years has led to the creation of group purchasing organizations (GPOs) that aggregate buying power for hospital groups and put pressure on our selling prices. We have multi-year supply agreements with several GPOs. During fiscal 2011, we experienced approximately $1,000 in unfavorable price variance, as a result of these agreements. However, these agreements help secure our products with these customers and have led to new business. While in the near term this has negatively impacted gross profit, further increases in volumes are expected from these contracts.
Foreign Currency
Favorable currency exchange rates resulted in approximately $600 of additional revenue being recognized by our European Diagnostics operating segment during fiscal 2011, compared to currency exchange rates having virtually no impact on the fiscal 2010 consolidated sales results. During fiscal 2009, currency exchange rates had an approximate $2,400 unfavorable impact on revenue.

 

- 29 -


Table of Contents

Life Science Operating Segment
Sales for our Life Science operating segment increased 43% in fiscal 2011, due primarily to a $15,000 revenue contribution from the Bioline Group acquired in July 2010. Excluding the impact of the Bioline Group, sales for the operating segment declined 5% for the year, as this business continues to experience both pricing pressure and reduced order volumes in bulk antigens, antibodies and related reagents. For fiscal 2012, we expect overall revenue growth of our Life Science operating segment to be in the range of 5% to 6%, led by the Bioline Group, which we expect to generate double-digit increases in sales of its molecular reagent products. We expect sales of our bulk antigen, antibody and reagent products to decline slightly in fiscal 2012 due to a slowing immunoassay demand profile.
As a result of the order volume trends in bulk antigens, antibodies and reagents, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we announced the closure of our Saco, Maine facility, and began the consolidation of our manufacturing operations from this facility with our Memphis, Tennessee facility. We expect the consolidation of manufacturing operations in Memphis will provide a lower overall cost structure and should be completed during the second fiscal quarter of 2012. Total costs to complete the consolidation of facilities are expected to be approximately $2,200, consisting of fixed asset impairments, inventory impairments, stay bonuses and moving costs, among other similar items. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we recognized $1,057 of these costs, and the balance will be recognized during fiscal 2012, primarily during the first half of the fiscal year.
Significant Customers
Our U.S. Diagnostic operating segment’s sales through two national distributors were 49% of the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment’s total sales, or 30% of consolidated sales, for fiscal 2011. This compares to fiscal 2010, in which sales through these distributors comprised 57% of U.S. Diagnostics operating segment sales and 36% of consolidated sales. The lower percentage of sales reflects the fact that the majority of our illumigene® product sales are direct, as well as the comparative decline in these distributors’ inventory stocking of influenza and other products.
Our Life Science operating segment’s sales of purified antigens and reagents to two diagnostic manufacturing customers were 15% of the Life Science operating segment’s total sales for fiscal 2011 or 4% of our consolidated sales for fiscal 2011, compared to 27% and 5% of fiscal 2010 Life Science operating segment and consolidated sales, respectively. The lower percentage of sales results primarily from the addition of the Bioline Group.

 

- 30 -


Table of Contents

Operating Segment Revenues:
Our reportable operating segments are U.S. Diagnostics, European Diagnostics and Life Science. The U.S. Diagnostics operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Cincinnati, Ohio, and the sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits in the U.S. and countries outside of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The European Diagnostics operating segment consists of the sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The Life Science operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Memphis, Tennessee; Saco, Maine; Boca Raton, Florida; London, England; Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia, and the sale and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and bioresearch reagents domestically and abroad. The Life Science operating segment also includes the contract development and manufacture of proteins and other biologicals for use by biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines.
Revenues for the Diagnostics operating segments, in the normal course of business, may be affected by buying patterns of major distributors, seasonality and strength of certain diseases, and foreign currency exchange rates. Revenues for the Life Science operating segment, in the normal course of business, may be affected by the timing and nature of arrangements for contract services work, which may have longer production cycles than bioresearch reagents and bulk antigens and antibodies, as well as buying patterns of major customers. We believe that the overall breadth of our product lines serves to reduce the variability in consolidated revenues.
Revenues for each of our operating segments are shown below.
                                         
                            2011 vs.     2010 vs.  
                            2010     2009  
    2011     2010     2009     Inc (Dec)     Inc (Dec)  
U.S. Diagnostics
  $ 97,133     $ 92,020     $ 98,970       6 %     (7 )%
European Diagnostics
    24,187       24,041       25,870       1 %     (7 )%
Life Science
    38,403       26,939       23,434       43 %     15 %
 
                             
Consolidated
  $ 159,723     $ 143,000     $ 148,274       12 %     (4 )%
 
                             
 
                                       
International -
                                       
U.S. Diagnostics
  $ 6,692     $ 6,268     $ 5,657       7 %     11 %
European Diagnostics
    24,187       24,041       25,870       1 %     (7 )%
Life Science
    22,283       13,082       9,911       70 %     32 %
 
                             
Total
  $ 53,162     $ 43,391     $ 41,438       23 %     5 %
 
                             
% of total sales
    33 %     30 %     28 %                

 

- 31 -


Table of Contents

Gross Profit:
                                         
                            2011 vs.     2010 vs.  
                            2010     2009  
    2011     2010     2009     Inc (Dec)     Inc (Dec)  
Gross Profit
  $ 99,298     $ 88,696     $ 92,442       12 %     (4 )%
 
                                       
Gross Profit Margin
    62 %     62 %     62 %            
The stability in our overall gross profit margins from 2009 to 2011 reflects the combined effects of 1) the margin contribution of Bioline Group products for a full year in fiscal 2011; 2) continued operating efficiencies in our Cincinnati, Ohio diagnostic test manufacturing facility; and 3) the year-over-year declines in respiratory product sales. Our respiratory product family generally has a lower gross profit margin than our focus product families (C. difficile, foodborne and H. pylori). Sales of respiratory products during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 were approximately 10%, 15% and 20%, respectively, of our consolidated sales. Specifically, sales of the Company’s influenza products during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 represented approximately 2%, 6% and 10%, respectively, of consolidated sales.
GPO contracts also impacted our gross profit margins during fiscal 2011 and 2010. These contracts provide customers with favorable pricing based on purchase volumes of Meridian products. During fiscal 2011, we experienced approximately $1,000 in unfavorable price variance, as a result of these agreements. However, these agreements help secure our products with these customers and have led to new business. While in the near term this has negatively impacted gross profit, further increases in volumes are expected from these contracts.
Our overall operations consist of the sale of diagnostic test kits for various disease states and in alternative test formats, as well as bioresearch reagents, bulk antigens and antibodies, proficiency panels, and contract research and development and contract manufacturing services. Product sales mix shifts, in the normal course of business, can cause the consolidated gross profit margin to fluctuate by several points.

 

- 32 -


Table of Contents

Operating Expenses:
                                         
                                    Total  
    Research &     Selling &     General &             Operating  
    Development     Marketing     Administrative     Other (1)     Expenses  
2009 Expenses
  $ 8,274     $ 18,324     $ 17,065     $     $ 43,663  
 
                             
% of Sales
    6 %     12 %     12 %     0 %     29 %
 
                                       
Fiscal 2010 Increases (Decreases):
                                       
U.S. Diagnostics
    (655 )     (377 )     1,511             479  
European Diagnostics
          (205 )     277             72  
Life Science
                                       
- Bioline Group
    117       493       787             1,397  
- Core
    660       15       32             707  
- Transaction Costs
                      1,240       1,240  
 
                             
 
                                       
2010 Expenses
  $ 8,396     $ 18,250     $ 19,672     $ 1,240     $ 47,558  
 
                             
% of Sales
    6 %     13 %     14 %     1 %     33 %
% Increase (Decrease)
    1 %     0 %     15 %           9 %
 
                                       
Fiscal 2011 Increases (Decreases):
                                       
U.S. Diagnostics
    844       1,236       183       365       2,628  
European Diagnostics
          143       156       875       1,174  
Life Science
                                       
- Bioline Group
    636       3,293       5,235             9,164  
- Core
    (54 )     (150 )     (363 )     548       (19 )
- Transaction Costs
                      (1,240 )     (1,240 )
 
                             
 
                                       
2011 Expenses
  $ 9,822     $ 22,772     $ 24,883     $ 1,788     $ 59,265  
 
                             
% of Sales
    6 %     14 %     16 %     1 %     37 %
% Increase (Decrease)
    17 %     25 %     26 %     44 %     25 %
Overall, the increase in total operating expenses during fiscal 2011 results in large part from (i) the impact on all three ongoing operating expense categories (i.e., Research & Development, Selling & Marketing, and General & Administrative) of adding the Bioline Group’s full-year operating expenses; (ii) incurring approximately $1,240 of costs during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 in connection with the reorganization of our sales and marketing leadership (including severance benefits for the former President and Managing Director of our European diagnostics business); and (iii) incurring approximately $1,057 of costs during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 in connection with the consolidation of our Saco, Maine operations into our Memphis, Tennessee location. The facility consolidation costs incurred to-date are comprised primarily of write-downs to property, equipment and inventory, and stay bonus costs for personnel scheduled to be terminated at varying times throughout fiscal 2012. Additional stay bonus costs totaling approximately $600 are expected to be incurred during fiscal 2012, with the majority of such costs to be incurred during the first and second quarters.

 

- 33 -


Table of Contents

Operating expenses for the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment increased $2,628 for fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 and increased $479 for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The overall net increase in fiscal 2011 reflects the combined effects of the following:
Research & Development
Overall increase in spending on new product development activities related to products submitted to the FDA during the year and planned for submission during fiscal 2012, as well as spending on increased illumigene® component qualification activities. Costs include increased personnel-related and quality control costs of approximately $450 and $150, respectively.
Selling & Marketing
The launch of illumigene® resulting in increased sales bonus and commissions expenses and increased travel and trade show expenses of approximately $750 and $300, respectively.
General & Administrative
The positive effects of overall cost containment and reduction efforts being offset by an approximate $750 increase in stock-based compensation during fiscal 2011.
The overall net increase in the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment’s expenses during fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 reflected the combined effects of: (i) decreased research and development spending as a result of completing the development of our molecular illumigene® C. difficile product, including the illumipro-10® instrument, which was launched during fiscal 2010, and comparatively higher clinical trial costs for certain immunoassay products in 2009; (ii) decreased sales and marketing expenses due to lower C. difficile and respiratory product sales resulting in lower bonus and commission costs for our sales organization; and (iii) increased general and administrative expenses as a result of higher compensation costs, including stock-based compensation costs related to time-vested restricted stock granted in November 2009.
Operating expenses for the European Diagnostics operating segment increased $1,174 for fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 and increased $72 for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The fiscal 2011 increase was primarily attributable to costs associated with the aforementioned reorganization of our sales and marketing leadership during the fiscal 2011 second quarter.
Operating expenses for the Life Science operating segment increased $9,145 for fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 and increased $2,104 for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009, excluding one-time transaction costs of $1,240. The increase in 2011 resulted from the previously-noted addition of the Bioline Group’s full-year operating expenses and the costs related to consolidating the Maine and Tennessee facilities. The increase in 2010 resulted primarily from increased salaries and benefits related to filling open positions, increased research and development resource allocations, and the addition of the Bioline Group’s operating expenses of $1,397.

 

- 34 -


Table of Contents

The amount of stock-based compensation expense reported for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $2,614, $1,866 and $1,092, respectively. During November 2008, we granted to certain employees restricted stock that was contingent upon Meridian achieving a specified net earnings level for fiscal 2009. Because Meridian’s fiscal net earnings did not reach the minimum level in 2009, these awards were not earned and no stock-based compensation has been recorded for these awards. In November 2009, we granted restricted shares and restricted share units to certain employees, with half of each employee’s grant being time-vested restricted shares or restricted share units vesting in total in four years, and the remaining half being subject to attainment of a specified earnings target for fiscal 2010. Dividends were paid on these shares and units throughout fiscal 2010. While the 2010 earnings target was not met, on September 30, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors chose to convert the performance-based restricted shares to time-vested restricted shares vesting in total after four years in recognition of the achievement in 2010 of several strategic initiatives that position the Company for future growth. Expense totaling $472 was recorded in fiscal 2010 as a result of this conversion, and is included in the total amount of stock-based compensation set forth above. Similarly, in November 2010, we granted restricted shares and restricted share units to certain employees, with half of each employee’s grant being time-vested restricted shares or restricted share units vesting in full in four years, and the remaining half being subject to attainment of a specified earnings target for fiscal 2011. Although dividends were paid on these shares and units throughout fiscal 2011, because Meridian’s net earnings did not reach the minimum level in fiscal 2011, the performance-based awards were not earned and no stock-based compensation has been recorded for these performance-based awards.
Operating Income
Operating income decreased 3% and 16% in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, as a result of the factors discussed above.
Other Income and Expense
Interest income was $115, $124 and $456, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decreases during the periods reflect (i) lower interest yields in the current interest rate environment, (ii) the use of cash early in the fiscal 2010 fourth quarter to acquire the Bioline Group, and (iii) the use of cash in fiscal 2011 to fund facility expansions in Cincinnati and Memphis, and to build illumigene® inventory. The increase in other income, net, during fiscal 2011 can primarily be attributed to the addition of the Bioline Group, as it contributed grant income from a foreign government agency of approximately $200. Receipt of grant income to this level, if at all, is not expected to continue in fiscal 2012 due to the local country’s rules regarding ownership by a U.S. parent.
Income Taxes
The effective rate for income taxes was 34%, 36% and 34% for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 was primarily attributable to the release of certain reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the passage of the relevant statutes of limitations and the nondeductible nature of Bioline acquisition costs. The effective rate increase in 2010 resulted primarily from the non-deductible nature of Bioline Group transaction costs and the expiration of the Federal research and experimentation tax credit effective December 31, 2009.

 

- 35 -


Table of Contents

Impact of Inflation
To the extent feasible, we have consistently followed the practice of adjusting our prices to reflect the impact of inflation on salaries and fringe benefits for employees and the cost of purchased materials and services. Inflation and changing prices did not have a material adverse impact on our gross margin, revenue or operating income in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
Comparative Cash Flow Analysis
Our cash flow and financing requirements are determined by analyses of operating and capital spending budgets, consideration of acquisition plans, and consideration of common share dividends. We have historically maintained a credit facility to augment working capital requirements and to respond quickly to acquisition opportunities. Our investment portfolio presently contains overnight repurchase agreements. We used $23,849 from our investment portfolio to complete the acquisition of the Bioline Group during July 2010.
We have an investment policy that guides the holdings of our investment portfolio. Our objectives in managing the investment portfolio are to (i) preserve capital, (ii) provide sufficient liquidity to meet working capital requirements and fund strategic objectives such as acquisitions, and (iii) capture a market rate of return commensurate with market conditions and our policy’s investment eligibility criteria. As we look forward, we will continue to manage the holdings of our investment portfolio with preservation of capital being the primary objective.
At the present time, we do not expect current conditions in the financial markets, or overall economic conditions to have a significant impact on our liquidity needs, financial condition, or results of operations, although no assurances can be made in this regard. We intend to continue to fund our working capital requirements and dividends from current cash flows from operating activities and cash on hand. We also have additional sources of liquidity through our $30,000 bank credit facility, if needed. To date, except for the Italian matter discussed below, we have not experienced any significant deterioration in the aging of our customer accounts receivable nor in our vendors’ ability to supply raw materials and services and extend normal credit terms. Approximately $4,900 of our accounts receivable at September 30, 2011 is due from Italian hospital customers whose funding ultimately comes from the Italian government. The magnitude of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, and Italy in particular, is significant. We have experienced a deterioration in the aging of our Italian accounts receivable and continue to monitor the situation closely. Our liquidity needs may change if overall economic conditions worsen and/or liquidity and credit within the financial markets remains tight for an extended period of time, and such conditions impact the collectability of our customer accounts receivable, or impact credit terms with our vendors, or disrupt the supply of raw materials and services.

 

- 36 -


Table of Contents

Fluctuations in overall stock market valuations may raise questions as to the potential impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets. Our annual goodwill impairment review takes place as of June 30th each year. There have been no impairments from these annual reviews. As of October 31, 2011, our stock price was $18.22 per share, compared to our book value per share of $3.36 as of September 30, 2011. This relationship, stock price trading at a 5.4x multiple of book value, is an indicator that the fluctuation in overall stock market valuations and its impact on our stock price has not been a triggering event for impairment of our goodwill and other long-lived assets.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased 24% to $22,456 in fiscal 2011. Given the relatively consistent level of net earnings, this decrease primarily reflects the effects of net working capital changes related to our investments in illumigene® inventory, including instruments, and the timing of payments from customers and payments to suppliers.
Net cash used for investing activities was $9,151 for fiscal 2011 compared to $16,332 for fiscal 2010. This decrease in cash used primarily results from an approximate $6,000 increase in expenditures for property, plant and equipment during fiscal 2011, including significant facility expansions in both Cincinnati and Memphis, being more than offset by the comparative effects of fiscal 2010 including, but not limited to, (i) the acquisition of the Bioline Group ($20,404 net cash used) and (ii) the sale of our student loan auction-rate securities ($7,275 net cash received).
Net cash used for financing activities was $27,520 for fiscal 2011 compared to $29,190 for fiscal 2010. This decrease was primarily attributable to a 3% increase in dividend payments being more than offset by an increase in proceeds and tax benefits from the exercise of stock options.
Net cash flows from operating activities and cash on hand are anticipated to be adequate to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures and dividends during the next twelve months. During the last seven fiscal quarters, the per share amount of our cash dividend has exceeded the per share amount of our diluted earnings. During fiscal 2012, management expects that this relationship will change; meaning the per share amount of our diluted earnings will exceed the per share amount of our current cash dividend, although no assurances can be made in this regard.

 

- 37 -


Table of Contents

Capital Resources
We have a $30,000 credit facility with a commercial bank which expires September 15, 2012. As of November 29, 2011, there were no borrowings outstanding on this facility and we had 100% borrowing capacity available to us. We have had no borrowings outstanding under this facility during fiscal 2011 or 2010.
Our capital expenditures are estimated to range between approximately $3,000 to $5,000 for fiscal 2012, with the actual amount depending upon actual operating results and the phasing of certain projects. Such expenditures may be funded with cash and equivalents on hand, operating cash flows, and/or availability under the $30,000 credit facility discussed above.
Known Contractual Obligations:
Known contractual obligations and their related due dates were as follows as of September 30, 2011:
                                         
            Less than 1                     More than  
    Total     Year     1-3 Years     4-5 Years     5 Years  
Operating leases (1)
  $ 2,877     $ 1,119     $ 1,521     $ 237     $  
 
               
Purchase obligations (2)
    8,524       7,911       613              
 
               
Uncertain income tax positions liability and interest (3)
    542       542                    
 
                             
Total
  $ 11,943     $ 9,572     $ 2,134     $ 237     $  
 
                             
 
                                       
     
(1)  
Meridian and its subsidiaries are lessees of (i) office and warehouse buildings in Cincinnati, Boston, Florida, Australia, Belgium, France, Holland, Germany and the U.K.; (ii) automobiles for use by the diagnostic direct sales forces in the U.S. and Europe; and (iii) certain office equipment such as facsimile machines and copier machines across all business units, under operating lease agreements that expire at various dates.
 
(2)  
Meridian’s purchase obligations are primarily outstanding purchase orders for inventory and service items. These contractual commitments are not in excess of expected production requirements over the next twelve months.
 
(3)  
As of September 30, 2011, our liabilities for uncertain tax positions and related interest and penalties were $422 and $120, respectively. Due to inherent uncertainties in the timing of settlement of tax positions, we are unable to estimate the timing of the effective settlement of these obligations.
Other Commitments and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements:
License Agreements
Meridian has entered into various license agreements that require payment of royalties based on a specified percentage of sales of related products (1% to 14%). Meridian expects that payments under these agreements will amount to approximately $4,500 in fiscal 2012. These royalty payments primarily relate to the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment.
Meridian entered into a license agreement in October 2006 with a third party that provides rights to a molecular technology for infectious disease testing in the United States, Europe and other geographic markets. The agreement, as amended, calls for remaining payments of up to approximately $3,500, based on the achievement of certain product development milestones and on-going royalties once products are available for commercial sale.

 

- 38 -


Table of Contents

Off-balance sheet arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Market Risk Exposure:
Foreign Currency Risk
We have market risk exposure related to foreign currency transactions. We are exposed to foreign currency risk related to our European distribution operations where the billing currency is the Euro for most of our customers in these markets. We also are exposed to foreign currency risk related to the supply of certain diagnostic test kits by manufacturers located in Germany and Spain. These foreign currency risks are opposite one another, providing a natural hedge with respect to consolidated gross profit and operating income. Additionally, as a result of the July 2010 Bioline Group acquisition, we are exposed to foreign currency risks related to the Bioline Group’s operations in Australia (Australian dollar), Germany (Euro), and the U.K. (British pound). Assessing foreign currency exposures is a component of our overall ongoing risk management process, with such currency risks managed as we believe appropriate.
Concentration of Customers/Products Risk
Our U.S. Diagnostic operating segment’s sales through two national distributors were 49% of the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment’s total sales or 30% of consolidated sales for fiscal 2011. Our C. difficile, foodborne and H. pylori product families accounted for 58% of our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment’s third-party sales during fiscal 2011. These same products accounted for 58% of our European Diagnostics operating segment’s third-party sales and 44% of our consolidated sales for fiscal 2011.
Our Life Science operating segment’s sales of purified antigens and reagents to two customers were 15% of the Life Science operating segment’s total sales for fiscal 2011 or 4% of our consolidated sales for fiscal 2011. Our Life Science operating segment has four other significant customers who purchase antigens, antibodies and reagents, which together comprise 10% of the operating segment’s total sales for fiscal 2011.
Critical Accounting Policies:
The consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Such accounting principles require management to make judgments about estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures. Management believes that the following accounting policies are critical to understanding the accompanying consolidated financial statements because the application of such polices requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions and the carrying values of related assets and liabilities are material.

 

- 39 -


Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition
Our revenues are derived primarily from product sales. Revenue is generally recognized from sales when product is shipped and title has passed to the buyer. Revenue for the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment is reduced at the date of sale for estimated rebates that will be claimed by customers. Rebate agreements are in place with certain independent national distributors and are designed to reimburse such distributors for their cost in handling our products. Management estimates accruals for rebate agreements based on data provided by these customers, estimates of inventories of our products held by these customers, historical statistics, current trends and other factors. Changes to the accruals are recorded in the period that they become known.
Revenue for our Diagnostics operating segments includes bundled product revenue for our illumigene® molecular test system. The bundled product includes an instrument, instrument accessories and test kits. If not sold outright, amounts invoiced for the illumigene® test kits cover the instrument, accessories and test kits. Revenue is recognized based on kit sales. If not sold outright, costs for the instruments are recognized in cost of sales over the period that we have a pricing agreement in effect with the customer, generally three years.
Life Science revenue for contract services may come from research and development services or manufacturing services, including process development work, or a combination of both. Revenue is recognized based on each of the deliverables in a given arrangement having distinct and separate customer pricing. Pricing is often subject to a competitive bidding process. Contract research and development services may be performed on a “time and materials” basis or “fixed fee” basis. For “time and materials” arrangements, revenue is recognized as services are performed and billed. For “fixed fee” arrangements, revenue is recognized upon completion and acceptance by the customer. For contract manufacturing services, revenue is generally recognized upon delivery of product and acceptance by the customer. In some cases, customers may request that we store on their behalf, clinical grade biologicals that we produce under contract manufacturing agreements. These cases arise when customers do not have clinical grade storage facilities or do not want to risk contamination during transport. For such cases, revenue may be recognized on a bill-and-hold basis. No such bill-and-hold arrangements existed at September 30, 2011 or September 30, 2010.
Inventories
Our inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis for substantially all of our inventories. We establish reserves against cost for excess and obsolete materials, finished goods whose shelf life may expire before sale to customers, and other identified exposures. Management estimates these reserves based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual demand and market conditions were to be less favorable than such estimates, additional inventory write-downs would be required and recorded in the period known. Such adjustments would negatively affect gross profit margin and overall results of operations.

 

- 40 -


Table of Contents

Intangible Assets
Our intangible assets include identifiable intangibles and goodwill. Identifiable intangibles include customer lists, supply agreements, manufacturing technologies, patents, licenses and trade names. All of Meridian’s identifiable intangibles have finite lives.
Goodwill is subject to an annual impairment review (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) by applying a fair-value based test. There have been no impairments from these analyses.
Identifiable intangibles with finite lives are subject to impairment testing. Identifiable intangibles with finite lives are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that such assets may not be recoverable at their current carrying value. Whether an event or circumstance triggers impairment is determined by comparing an estimate of the asset’s undiscounted future cash flows to its carrying value. If impairment has occurred, it is measured by a fair-value based test. There were no events or circumstances in fiscal 2011, 2010 or 2009 indicating that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable.
Our ability to recover intangible assets, both identifiable intangibles and goodwill, is dependent upon the future cash flows of the related acquired businesses and assets. Management is required to make judgments and assumptions regarding future cash flows, including sales levels, gross profit margins, operating expense levels, working capital levels, and capital expenditures. With respect to identifiable intangibles, management also makes judgments and assumptions regarding useful lives.
Management considers the following factors in evaluating events and circumstances for possible impairment: (i) significant under-performance relative to historical or projected operating results, (ii) negative industry trends, (iii) sales levels of specific groups of products (related to specific identifiable intangibles), (iv) changes in overall business strategies, and (v) other factors.
If actual cash flows are less favorable than projections, this could trigger impairment of intangible assets and other long-lived assets. If impairment were to occur, this would negatively affect overall results of operations.
Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes includes federal, foreign, state and local income taxes currently payable and those deferred because of temporary differences between income for financial reporting purposes and income for tax purposes. We prepare estimates of permanent and temporary differences between income for financial reporting purposes and income for tax purposes. These differences are adjusted to actual upon filing of our tax returns, typically occurring in the third and fourth quarters of the current fiscal year for the preceding fiscal year’s estimates.

 

- 41 -


Table of Contents

Our deferred tax assets include net operating loss carryforwards in foreign jurisdictions. The realization of tax benefits related to net operating loss carryforwards is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the applicable jurisdictions. Management assesses the level of deferred tax asset valuation allowance by taking into consideration historical and future projected operating results, future reversals of taxable temporary differences, as well as tax planning strategies. The amount of net deferred tax assets considered realizable could be reduced in future years if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
Undistributed earnings in our non-U.S. subsidiaries are considered by management to be permanently re-invested in such subsidiaries. Consequently, U.S. deferred tax liabilities on such earnings have not been recorded. We believe that such U.S. taxes would be largely offset by foreign tax credits for taxes paid locally.
From time to time, our tax returns in federal, state and foreign jurisdictions are examined by the applicable tax authorities. To the extent that adjustments result from the completion of these examinations or the lapsing of statutes of limitation, they will affect tax liabilities in the period known. We believe that the results of any tax authority examinations would not have a significant adverse impact on financial condition or results of operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In May 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. FASB ASU No. 2011-04 amends and clarifies the measurement and disclosure requirements of FASB ASC 820, resulting in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, clarification of how to apply existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements, and changes to certain principles and requirements for measuring fair value and disclosing information about fair value measurements. The new requirements are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company plans to adopt this amended guidance on October 1, 2012 and at this time does not anticipate that it will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In June 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends the disclosure and presentation requirements of Comprehensive Income. Specifically, FASB ASU No. 2011-05 requires that all nonowner changes in shareholders’ equity be presented either in 1) a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or 2) two separate but consecutive statements, in which the first statement presents total net income and its components, and the second statement presents total other comprehensive income and its components. These new presentation requirements, as currently set forth, are effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company will proceed with evaluating the presentation alternatives provided within FASB ASU No. 2011-05, as well as the permitted dates of adoption, and determine the most appropriate changes to be made to the current presentation of comprehensive income within its Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and when to make such changes.

 

- 42 -


Table of Contents

In September 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which amended goodwill impairment guidance to provide an option for entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. After assessing the totality of events and circumstances, if an entity determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, performance of the two-step impairment test is no longer required. This guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flow or financial position.
Additionally, see Note 1 (n) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See Market Risk Exposure and Capital Resources under Item 7 above.

 

- 43 -


Table of Contents

ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
         
    45  
 
       
    46  
 
       
    48  
 
       
    49  
 
       
    50  
 
       
    52  
 
       
    53  
 
       
    81  
All other supplemental schedules are omitted due to the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

 

- 44 -


Table of Contents

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting can only provide reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on management’s evaluation and those criteria, the Company concluded that its system of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2011.
The company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
/s/ John A. Kraeutler
 
John A. Kraeutler
  /s/ Melissa A. Lueke
 
Melissa A. Lueke
   
Chief Executive Officer
  Executive Vice President and    
November 29, 2011
  Chief Financial Officer    
 
  November 29, 2011    

 

- 45 -


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Meridian Bioscience, Inc. (an Ohio corporation) and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2011. Our audits of the basic financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Schedule No. II. We also have audited Meridian Bioscience, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Meridian Bioscience, Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule and an opinion on Meridian Bioscience, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

- 46 -


Table of Contents

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Meridian Bioscience, Inc. as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
In our opinion, Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries, maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
November 29, 2011

 

- 47 -


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands, except per share data)
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                         
For the Year Ended September 30,   2011     2010     2009  
 
                       
Net Sales
  $ 159,723     $ 143,000     $ 148,274  
Cost of Sales
    59,916       54,304       55,832  
Cost of Sales — Plant consolidation
    509              
 
                 
Gross Profit
    99,298       88,696       92,442  
 
                 
 
                       
Operating Expenses:
                       
Research and development
    9,822       8,396       8,274  
Selling and marketing
    22,772       18,250       18,324  
General and administrative
    24,883       19,672       17,065  
Sales and marketing leadership reorganization
    1,240              
Plant consolidation costs
    548              
Bioline Group transaction costs
          1,240        
 
                 
Total operating expenses
    59,265       47,558       43,663  
 
                 
 
                       
Operating Income
    40,033       41,138       48,779  
 
                       
Other Income:
                       
Interest income
    115       124       456  
Other, net
    352       138       88  
 
                 
Total other income
    467       262       544  
 
                 
 
                       
Earnings Before Income Taxes
    40,500       41,400       49,323  
 
                       
Income Tax Provision
    13,669       14,753       16,564  
 
                 
 
                       
Net Earnings
  $ 26,831     $ 26,647     $ 32,759  
 
                 
 
                       
Earnings Per Share Data:
                       
Basic earnings per common share
  $ 0.66     $ 0.66     $ 0.81  
Diluted earnings per common share
  $ 0.65     $ 0.65     $ 0.80  
 
                       
Common shares used for basic earnings per common share
    40,715       40,515       40,390  
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted shares and units
    643       634       720  
 
                 
Common shares used for diluted earnings per common share
    41,358       41,149       41,110  
 
                 
 
                       
Dividends declared per common share
  $ 0.76     $ 0.74     $ 0.65  
 
                       
Anti-dilutive Securities:
                       
 
                       
Common share options and restricted shares and units
    191       217       138  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

- 48 -


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (dollars in thousands)
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                         
For the Year Ended September 30,   2011     2010     2009  
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
                       
Net earnings
  $ 26,831     $ 26,647     $ 32,759  
Non-cash items:
                       
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
    3,380       3,104       2,781  
Amortization of intangible assets
    2,321       1,581       1,579  
Amortization of deferred illumigene contract costs
    172              
Stock based compensation
    2,504       1,866       1,092  
Deferred income taxes
    (1,218 )     12       (500 )
Loss on disposition and write-down of fixed assets
    446       26       109  
Change in current assets, net of acquisition
    (10,762 )     2,429       (5,353 )
Change in current liabilities, net of acquisition
    (570 )     (5,775 )     269  
Other, net
    (648 )     (157 )     (244 )
 
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    22,456       29,733       32,492  
 
                 
 
           
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
                       
Acquisition earnout payments
                (7 )
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
    (9,139 )     (3,083 )     (3,643 )
Proceeds from dispositions of property, plant and equipment
                5  
Proceeds from sales and calls of short-term investments
          7,275       475  
Acquisition of Bioline Group, net of cash received
          (20,404 )      
Purchases of intangibles and other assets
    (12 )     (120 )     (110 )
 
                 
Net cash used for investing activities
    (9,151 )     (16,332 )     (3,280 )
 
                 
 
               
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
                       
Dividends paid
    (30,943 )     (29,985 )     (26,260 )
Proceeds and tax benefits from exercises of stock options
    3,423       795       1,624  
 
                 
Net cash used for financing activities
    (27,520 )     (29,190 )     (24,636 )
 
                 
 
                       
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Equivalents
    (38 )     (362 )     157  
 
                       
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents
    (14,253 )     (16,151 )     4,733  
 
                       
Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of Period
    37,879       54,030       49,297  
 
                 
 
                       
Cash and Equivalents at End of Period
  $ 23,626     $ 37,879     $ 54,030  
 
                 
 
                       
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
                       
Cash paid for income taxes
  $ 17,991     $ 16,036     $ 17,472  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

- 49 -


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (dollars in thousands)
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                 
As of September 30,   2011     2010  
Assets
               
Current Assets:
               
Cash and equivalents
  $ 23,626     $ 37,879  
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $310 in 2011 and $241 in 2010
    24,844       22,064  
Inventories
    32,689       28,420  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    6,343       5,071  
Deferred income taxes
    2,852       1,871  
 
           
Total current assets
    90,354       95,305  
 
           
 
               
Property, Plant and Equipment, at Cost:
               
Land
    1,184       991  
Buildings and improvements
    23,033       20,670  
Machinery, equipment and furniture
    32,408       31,945  
Construction in progress
    3,887       1,320  
 
           
Subtotal
    60,512       54,926  
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
    33,973       33,689  
 
           
Net property, plant and equipment
    26,539       21,237  
 
           
 
               
Other Assets:
               
Goodwill
    23,124       23,302  
Other intangible assets, net
    10,947       13,327  
Restricted cash
    1,000       1,000  
Deferred illumigene contract costs, net
    3,304       231  
Other assets
    225       239  
 
           
Total other assets
    38,600       38,099  
 
           
 
               
Total assets
  $ 155,493     $ 154,641  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

- 50 -


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (dollars in thousands)
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                 
As of September 30,   2011     2010  
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
               
Current Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 5,548     $ 4,466  
Accrued employee compensation costs
    4,235       3,451  
Other accrued expenses
    4,692       5,521  
Income taxes payable
    789       1,086  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    15,264       14,524  
 
           
 
               
Deferred Income Taxes
    1,705       2,756  
 
               
Commitments and Contingencies
               
 
               
Shareholders’ Equity:
               
Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
           
Common shares, no par value, 71,000,000 shares authorized, 41,237,120 and 40,654,286 issued
           
Additional paid-in capital
    100,010       94,529  
Retained earnings
    38,065       42,177  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    449       655  
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
    138,524       137,361  
 
           
 
               
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 155,493     $ 154,641  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

- 51 -


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                                                 
                      Accum.              
    Common     Additional             Other Comp.     Comp.        
    Shares     Paid-in     Retained     Income     Income        
    Issued     Capital     Earnings     (Loss)     (Loss)     Total  
Balance at September 30, 2008
    40,314     $ 89,107     $ 39,016     $ 366             $ 128,489  
 
                                   
Cash dividends paid — $0.65 per share
                (26,260 )                   (26,260 )
Exercise of stock options
    179       1,476                           1,476  
Stock compensation expense
          1,092                           1,092  
Cost of S-8 registration statement
          (7 )                         (7 )
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net earnings
                32,759             $ 32,759       32,759  
Hedging activity, net
                      (3 )     (3 )     (3 )
Transfer of investments to trading status
                      270       270       270  
Other comprehensive income taxes
                      (190 )     (190 )     (190 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                      279       279       279  
 
                                             
Comprehensive income
                                  $ 33,115          
 
                                   
Balance at September 30, 2009
    40,493       91,668       45,515       722               137,905  
 
                                   
Cash dividends paid — $0.74 per share
                  (29,985 )                   (29,985 )
Exercise of stock options
    67       995                           995  
Issuance of restricted shares, net of forfeitures
    94                                  
Stock compensation expense
          1,866                           1,866  
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net earnings
                26,647             $ 26,647       26,647  
Other comprehensive income taxes
                      36       36       36  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                      (103 )     (103 )     (103 )
 
                                             
Comprehensive income
                                  $ 26,580          
 
                                   
Balance at September 30, 2010
    40,654       94,529       42,177       655               137,361  
 
                                   
Cash dividends paid — $0.76 per share
                  (30,943 )                   (30,943 )
Exercise of stock options
    485       2,977                           2,977  
Issuance of restricted shares, net of forfeitures
    165                                  
Cancellation of restricted shares
    (85 )                                
Conversion of restricted stock units
    18                                  
Stock compensation expense
          2,504                           2,504  
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net earnings
                26,831             $ 26,831       26,831  
Other comprehensive income taxes
                      114       114       114  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                      (320 )     (320 )     (320 )
 
                                             
Comprehensive income
                                  $ 26,625          
 
                                   
Balance at September 30, 2011
    41,237     $ 100,010     $ 38,065     $ 449             $ 138,524  
 
                                   
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

- 52 -


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a)  
Nature of Business — Meridian is a fully-integrated life science company whose principal businesses are (i) the development, manufacture and distribution of diagnostic test kits primarily for certain gastrointestinal, viral, respiratory and parasitic infectious diseases, (ii) the manufacture and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and bioresearch reagents used by researchers and other diagnostic manufacturers and (iii) the contract development and manufacture of proteins and other biologicals for use by biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines.
(b)  
Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “Meridian,” “we,” “us, “ “our “ or “our company” refer to Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
(c)  
Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates are discussed in Notes 1 (f), 1 (g), 1 (h), 1 (i), 1 (k), 1 (l), 7 and 8 (b).
(d)  
Foreign Currency Translation - Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated using year-end exchange rates with gains or losses resulting from translation included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Revenues and expenses are translated using exchange rates prevailing during the year. We also recognize foreign currency transaction gains and losses on certain assets and liabilities that are denominated in the Australian dollar, British pound and Euro currencies. These gains and losses are included in other income and expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

- 53 -


Table of Contents

(e)  
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments — The primary objectives of our investment activities are to preserve capital and provide sufficient liquidity to meet operating requirements and fund strategic initiatives such as acquisitions. We maintain a written investment policy that governs the management of our investments in fixed income securities. This policy, among other things, provides that we may purchase only high credit-quality securities, that have short-term ratings of at least A-1 and P-1 or better, and long-term ratings of at least A-2 and A or better, by Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, respectively, at the time of purchase. We consider short-term investments with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents, including overnight repurchase agreements and institutional money market funds. At times our investments of cash and equivalents with various high credit quality financial institutions may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance (FDIC) insurance limit.
   
Our investment portfolio includes the following components:
                                 
    September 30, 2011     September 30, 2010  
    Cash and             Cash and        
    Equivalents     Other     Equivalents     Other  
Repurchase agreements
  $ 11,784     $     $ 14,862     $  
Money market funds
                10,249        
 
                               
Cash on hand -
                               
Restricted
          1,000             1,000  
Unrestricted
    11,842             12,768        
 
                       
Total
  $ 23,626     $ 1,000     $ 37,879     $ 1,000  
 
                       
(f)  
Inventories — Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out basis (FIFO) for substantially all of our inventories. illumigene® instruments are carried in inventory until customer placement, at which time they are transferred to deferred illumigene contract costs, unless sold outright.
   
We establish reserves against cost for excess and obsolete materials, finished goods whose shelf life may expire before sale to customers, and other identified exposures. Such reserves were $1,635 and $1,130 at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We estimate these reserves based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual demand and market conditions were to be less favorable than such estimates, additional inventory write-downs would be required and recorded in the period known. Such adjustments would negatively affect gross profit margin and overall results of operations.
(g)  
Property, Plant and Equipment — Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Upon retirement or other disposition of property, plant and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in earnings. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method in amounts sufficient to write-off the cost over the estimated useful lives as follows:
     
Buildings and improvements — 18 to 40 years
 
     
Machinery, equipment and furniture — 3 to 10 years
 
     
Computer equipment and software — 3 to 5 years

 

- 54 -


Table of Contents

   
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we announced the closure of our Saco, Maine facility, and began the consolidation of manufacturing operations from this facility with our Memphis, Tennessee facility. In connection with this consolidation, the carrying value of certain property, plant and equipment, including the building, was determined to be impaired and a write-down of approximately $425 has been recorded as of September 30, 2011. The building and the property on which it sits have been written down to current value, less selling costs, as determined by an independent outside appraisal.
(h)  
Intangible Assets — Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are subject to an annual impairment review (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) by applying a fair-value based test. Fair value is determined via a market approach from three perspectives. These three perspectives are (i) an allocation of our actual enterprise value (defined as market capitalization plus debt less cash and cash equivalents) to each of the reporting units based on revenue and EBITDA contributions to consolidated results; (ii) an allocation of implied enterprise values to each of our reporting units based on average and median EBITDA multiples from a comparable group of companies; and (iii) a review of enterprise value to EBITDA multiples from recent industry merger and acquisition transactions. We perform our annual impairment review as of June 30, the end of our third fiscal quarter. We have no intangible assets with indefinite lives other than goodwill. There have been no impairments from these analyses for fiscal 2011, 2010 or 2009.
   
The change in goodwill was a decrease of $178 and an increase of $13,436 in fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively. These changes related entirely to the Life Science operating segment’s Bioline Group — fiscal 2010’s increase from the Bioline Group acquisition in July 2010 and fiscal 2011’s decrease from the currency translation adjustments thereon. See Note 2.
   
A summary of Meridian’s acquired intangible assets subject to amortization, as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows.
                                 
    2011     2010  
    Gross             Gross        
    Carrying     Accum.     Carrying     Accum.  
As of September 30,   Value     Amort.     Value     Amort.  
Manufacturing technologies, core products and cell lines
  $ 11,626     $ 8,545     $ 11,644     $ 7,693  
Trademarks, licenses and patents
    3,538       1,337       3,547       997  
Customer lists and supply agreements
    12,222       6,557       12,537       5,816  
Non-compete agreements
                126       21  
 
                       
 
  $ 27,386     $ 16,439     $ 27,854     $ 14,527  
 
                       

 

- 55 -


Table of Contents

   
The actual aggregate amortization expense for these intangible assets for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $2,321, $1,581 and $1,579, respectively. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for these intangible assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows: fiscal 2012 — $2,080, fiscal 2013 — $2,080, fiscal 2014 — $1,642, fiscal 2015 — $1,393 and fiscal 2016 — $1,050.
   
Long-lived assets, excluding goodwill and identifiable intangibles with indefinite lives, are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that such assets may not be recoverable at their carrying value. Whether an event or circumstance triggers an impairment is determined by comparing an estimate of the asset’s future undiscounted cash flows to its carrying value. If impairment has occurred, it is measured by a fair-value based test.
   
Our ability to recover our intangible assets, both identifiable intangibles and goodwill, is dependent upon the future cash flows of the related acquired businesses and assets. We make judgments and assumptions regarding future cash flows, including sales levels, gross profit margins, operating expense levels, working capital levels, and capital expenditures. With respect to identifiable intangibles and fixed assets, we also make judgments and assumptions regarding useful lives. See Note 1 (g) regarding impairment write-downs related to the consolidation of our Maine operations.
   
We consider the following factors in evaluating events and circumstances for possible impairment: (i) significant under-performance relative to historical or projected operating results; (ii) negative industry trends; (iii) sales levels of specific groups of products (related to specific identifiable intangibles); (iv) changes in overall business strategies; and (v) other factors.
   
If actual cash flows are less favorable than projections, this could trigger impairment of intangible assets and other long-lived assets. If impairment were to occur, this would negatively affect overall results of operations.
(i)  
Revenue Recognition — Revenue is generally recognized from sales when product is shipped and title has passed to the buyer. Revenue for the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment is reduced at the date of sale for estimated rebates that will be claimed by customers. Management estimates accruals for rebate agreements based on data provided by these customers, estimates of inventories of our products held by these customers, historical statistics, current trends, and other factors. Changes to the accruals are recorded in the period that they become known. Our rebate accruals were $4,176 at September 30, 2011 and $5,273 at September 30, 2010, and have been netted against accounts receivable.

 

- 56 -


Table of Contents

   
Revenue for our Diagnostics operating segments includes bundled product revenue for our illumigene® molecular test system. The bundled product includes an instrument, instrument accessories and test kits. If not sold outright, amounts invoiced for the illumigene® test kits cover the instrument, accessories and test kits. Revenue is recognized based on kit sales. If not sold outright, costs for the instruments are recognized in cost of sales over the period that we have a pricing agreement in effect with the customer, generally three years.
   
Life Science revenue for contract services may come from research and development services or manufacturing services, including process development work, or a combination of both. Revenue is recognized based on each of the deliverables in a given arrangement having distinct and separate customer pricing. Pricing is often subject to a competitive bidding process. Contract research and development services may be performed on a “time and materials” basis or “fixed fee” basis. For “time and materials” arrangements, revenue is recognized as services are performed and billed. For “fixed fee” arrangements, revenue is recognized upon completion and acceptance by the customer. For contract manufacturing services, revenue is generally recognized upon delivery of product and acceptance by the customer. In some cases, customers may request that we store on their behalf, clinical grade biologicals that we produce under contract manufacturing agreements. These cases arise when customers do not have clinical grade storage facilities or do not want to risk contamination during transport. For such cases, revenue may be recognized on a bill-and-hold basis. No such bill-and-hold arrangements existed at September 30, 2011 or September 30, 2010.
   
Trade accounts receivable are recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at invoiced amounts less provisions for rebates and doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our estimate of probable credit losses and is based on historical write-off experience. The allowance for doubtful accounts and related metrics, such as days’ sales outstanding, are reviewed monthly. Accounts with past due balances over 90 days are reviewed individually for collectibility. Customer invoices are charged off against the allowance when we believe it is probable that the invoices will not be paid.
(j)  
Research and Development Costs — Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development costs include, among other things, salaries and wages for research scientists, materials and supplies used in the development of new products, costs for development of instrumentation equipment, costs for clinical trials, and costs for facilities and equipment.
(k)  
Income Taxes — The provision for income taxes includes federal, foreign, state and local income taxes currently payable and those deferred because of temporary differences between income for financial reporting and income for tax purposes. We prepare estimates of permanent and temporary differences between income for financial reporting purposes and income for tax purposes. These differences are adjusted to actual upon filing of our tax returns, typically occurring in the third and fourth quarters of the current fiscal year for the preceding fiscal year’s estimates.

 

- 57 -


Table of Contents

   
We account for uncertain tax positions using a benefit recognition model with a two-step approach: (i) a more-likely-than-not recognition criterion; and (ii) a measurement attribute that measures the position as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being ultimately realized upon ultimate settlement. If it is not more likely than not that the benefit will be sustained on its technical merits, no benefit is recorded. We recognize accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as a portion of our income tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 7.
(l)  
Stock-based Compensation — We recognize compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees, based upon the fair value of the share-based award on the date of the grant. See Note 8(b).
(m)  
Comprehensive Income (Loss) — Comprehensive income (loss) represents the net change in shareholders’ equity during a period from sources other than transactions with shareholders. Our comprehensive income or loss is comprised of net earnings, foreign currency translation, and the related income tax effects. Components of beginning and ending accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, and related activity, are shown in the following table:
                         
    Foreign              
    Currency              
    Translation     Income        
    Adjustment     Taxes     Total  
Balance at September 30, 2010
  $ 1,007     $ (352 )   $ 655  
 
                 
Currency translation
    (320 )           (320 )
Income taxes
          114       114  
 
                 
Balance at September 30, 2011
  $ 687     $ (238 )   $ 449  
 
                 
(n)  
Recent Accounting Pronouncements — In May 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. FASB ASU No. 2011-04 amends and clarifies the measurement and disclosure requirements of FASB ASC 820, resulting in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, clarification of how to apply existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements, and changes to certain principles and requirements for measuring fair value and disclosing information about fair value measurements. The new requirements are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company plans to adopt this amended guidance on October 1, 2012 and at this time does not anticipate that it will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

 

- 58 -


Table of Contents

   
In June 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends the disclosure and presentation requirements of Comprehensive Income. Specifically, FASB ASU No. 2011-05 requires that all nonowner changes in shareholders’ equity be presented either in 1) a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or 2) two separate but consecutive statements, in which the first statement presents total net income and its components, and the second statement presents total other comprehensive income and its components. These new presentation requirements, as currently set forth, are effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company will proceed with evaluating the presentation alternatives provided within FASB ASU No. 2011-05, as well as the permitted dates of adoption, and determine the most appropriate changes to be made to the current presentation of comprehensive income within its Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and when to make such changes.
   
In September 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which amended goodwill impairment guidance to provide an option for entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. After assessing the totality of events and circumstances, if an entity determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, performance of the two-step impairment test is no longer required. This guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flow or financial position.
(o)  
Shipping and Handling costs — Shipping and handling costs invoiced to customers are included in net sales. Costs to distribute products to customers, including freight costs, warehousing costs, and other shipping and handling activities are included in cost of goods sold.
(p)  
Non-income Government-Assessed Taxes — We classify all non-income, government-assessed taxes (sales, use, and value-added) collected from customers and remitted by us to appropriate revenue authorities, on a net basis (excluded from net sales) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
(q)  
Reclassifications — Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior fiscal year financial statements to conform to the current fiscal year presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net earnings or shareholders’ equity.
(2) Acquisition of Bioline Group
On July 20, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of the Bioline group of companies (collectively the “Bioline Group”). We paid $23,849 from cash and equivalents on hand to acquire the Bioline Group. Headquartered in London, the Bioline Group is a leading manufacturer and distributor of molecular biology reagents with additional operations in Germany, Australia and the United States. The highly specialized molecular biology reagents it supplies to the life science research, biotech, pharmaceutical and commercial diagnostics markets are the critical components used in PCR testing for DNA, RNA and other genomic testing.

 

- 59 -


Table of Contents

As a result of the consideration paid exceeding the fair value of the net assets being acquired, goodwill in the amount of $12,992 was recorded in connection with this acquisition, none of which will be deductible for tax purposes. This goodwill results largely from the addition of key global operations and direct sales capabilities, management talent and a research-oriented customer base, to complement our existing Life Science operations. In addition to the Bioline Group’s results of operations since the acquisition date, which are included in our fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 Consolidated Statement of Operations and reported as part of the Life Science operating segment, the consolidated results for fiscal 2011 and 2010 also include:
  i)  
$587 and $230 of Cost of Sales for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively, related to the roll-out of fair value inventory adjustments for sales of products that were in the Bioline Group’s inventory on the date of acquisition and, therefore, were valued at fair value, rather than manufactured cost, in the opening balance sheet;
  ii)  
$1,003 and $166 of General and Administrative Expenses for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively, related to the amortization of specific identifiable intangible assets recorded on the opening balance sheet, including customer relationships, license agreements, non-compete agreements, manufacturing processes and trade names; and
  iii)  
$1,240 of transaction costs for fiscal 2010 reflected as Operating Expenses.
The results of the Bioline Group included in the consolidated results of the Company for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 are as follows, reflecting the items noted above:
                 
    2011     2010  
Net Sales
  $ 14,869     $ 2,084  
Operating Income (Loss)
  $ 26     $ (126 )
Net Earnings (Loss)
  $ 240     $ (1,262 )

 

- 60 -


Table of Contents

The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of the Bioline Group are as follows:
                         
    July 20,              
    2010     Measurement     July 20,  
    (as initially     Period     2010  
    reported)     Adjustments     (as adjusted)  
Fair value of assets acquired -
                       
Cash and equivalents
  $ 3,445             $ 3,445  
Accounts receivable
    1,897               1,897  
Inventories
    2,807               2,807  
Other current assets
    371     $ (21 )     350  
Property, plant and equipment, net
    816               816  
Goodwill
    13,166       (174 )     12,992  
Other intangible assets (estimated useful life):
                       
Customer relationships (10 years)
    3,898               3,898  
Manufacturing processes (6 years)
    1,467               1,467  
License agreements (approximate 8 year wtd. avg.)
    718               718  
Non-compete agreements (1 year)
    122               122  
Trade names (10 years)
    995               995  
 
                 
 
    29,702       (195 )     29,507  
Fair value of liabilities assumed -
                       
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    2,817       364       3,181  
Deferred income tax liabilities
    3,036       (559 )     2,477  
 
                 
Total consideration paid
  $ 23,849     $     $ 23,849  
 
                 
As of September 30, 2011, the purchase price allocation related to the acquisition of the Bioline Group has been finalized and is reflected in the above fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These fair values are based on the information that was available as of the acquisition date and the filing date of this Form 10-K and are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, including retrospective adjustment of the September 30, 2010 Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The consolidated pro forma results of the combined entities of Meridian and the Bioline Group, had the acquisition date been October 1, 2008, are as follows for the periods indicated:
                         
    (UNAUDITED)  
    Fiscal Year Ended September 30,  
    2011     2010     2009  
Net Sales
  $ 159,723     $ 153,635     $ 160,525  
Net Earnings
  $ 27,282     $ 27,833     $ 31,700  
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
  $ 0.66     $ 0.68     $ 0.77  

 

- 61 -


Table of Contents

These pro forma amounts have been calculated after adjusting the results of the Bioline Group to reflect the transaction costs incurred by the Company and the additional amortization that would have been charged assuming the previously-discussed fair value adjustments to inventory and identifiable intangible assets had been applied on October 1, 2008, together with the consequential tax effects. Fiscal 2011 pro forma earnings exclude $694 related to amortization of the fair value adjustments to inventory and certain of the identifiable intangible assets, and the related tax effects, as these amounts have been included in the fiscal 2009 pro forma earnings. Fiscal 2010 pro forma earnings (i) exclude $1,470 related to amortization of the fair value adjustments to inventory and transaction costs incurred by the Company, and the related tax effects, as these amounts have been included in the fiscal 2009 pro forma earnings and (ii) include an additional $730 of amortization of identifiable intangible assets, and the related tax effects, that would have resulted from applying the previously-discussed fair value adjustments as of October 1, 2008.
(3) Inventories
Inventories are comprised of the following:
                 
As of September 30,   2011     2010  
Raw materials
  $ 7,598     $ 6,221  
Work-in-process
    7,427       6,784  
Finished goods — illumigene instruments
    4,179       455  
Finished goods — kits and other
    15,120       16,090  
 
           
Gross Inventory
  $ 34,324     $ 29,550  
 
           
Reserves
    (1,635 )     (1,130 )
 
           
Net Inventory
  $ 32,689     $ 28,420  
 
           
(4) Bank Credit Arrangements
We have a $30,000 credit facility with a commercial bank, which expires in September 2012. This credit facility is collateralized by our business assets, except for those of non-U.S. subsidiaries, which totaled approximately $128,000 at September 30, 2011. There were no borrowings outstanding on this credit facility at September 30, 2011 or September 30, 2010. Available borrowings under this credit facility were $30,000 at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010. In connection with this bank credit facility, we are required to comply with financial covenants that limit the amount of debt obligations and require a minimum amount of tangible net worth. We are in compliance with all covenants. We are also required to maintain a cash compensating balance with the bank in the amount of $1,000, pursuant to this bank credit facility and are in compliance with this requirement.
(5) Hedging Transactions
Prior to February 1, 2009, we managed exchange rate risk related to forecasted intercompany sales denominated in the Euro currency through the use of forward exchange contracts and designated such forward contracts as cash flow hedges. As such, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument was reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into revenues in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affected earnings. As of September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, we had no such contracts outstanding.

 

- 62 -


Table of Contents

During January 2009, €500 notional amount of forward exchange contracts were settled in accordance with their original maturities. The realized gain on these contracts was $32. Also during January 2009, we accelerated the settlement of the remaining €2,700 notional amount of forward exchange contracts that were originally scheduled to mature between February 27, 2009 and December 31, 2009. These transactions resulted in a gain of approximately $140 that was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. We unwound these forward exchange contracts after completing a strategic review of our foreign currency exposures. This strategic review revealed that we have natural currency hedges in place for consolidated gross profit and operating income via certain Meridian-branded diagnostic test kits that we purchase in Euros from suppliers in Spain and Germany.
The amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income on the effective portion of our foreign exchange contracts was $0, $0 and $109 in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The amount of gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income on the effective portion of these foreign exchange contracts was $0, $0 and $112, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. No portion of the gain/loss was excluded from other comprehensive income due to effectiveness testing.
(6) Fair Value Measurements
We use a fair value measurement to value our financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value hierarchy prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date for assets and liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, that is, markets in which there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers, or in which little information is released publicly and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs, developed using our estimates and assumptions, which reflect those that the market participants would use. Such inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

 

- 63 -


Table of Contents

Determining where an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy depends on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole. In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and considers counterparty credit risk in the assessment of fair value.
We had no financial assets or liabilities carried at fair value at September 30, 2011 to be classified as Level 1, 2 or 3. As of September 30, 2010, financial assets and liabilities to be so classified were comprised solely of money market funds totaling $10,249 classified as Level 1, with no financial assets or liabilities classified as Level 2 or Level 3.
(7) Income Taxes
(a)  
Earnings before income taxes, and the related provision for income taxes for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
                         
Year Ended September 30,   2011     2010     2009  
 
               
Domestic
  $ 37,955     $ 38,329     $ 46,504  
Foreign
    2,545       3,071       2,819  
 
                 
Total earnings before income taxes
  $ 40,500     $ 41,400     $ 49,323  
 
                 
Provision (credit) for income taxes -
                       
Federal -
                       
Current provision
  $ 13,336     $ 13,626     $ 15,094  
Temporary differences
                       
Fixed asset basis differences and depreciation
    (155 )     58       16  
Intangible asset basis differences and amortization
    (312 )     (335 )     (363 )
Currently non-deductible expenses and reserves
    (627 )     (29 )     (134 )
Stock based compensation
    (706 )     (618 )     (373 )
Other, net
    35       (75 )     48  
 
                 
Subtotal
    11,571       12,627       14,288  
State and local
    1,213       1,186       1,385  
Foreign
    885       940       891  
 
                 
Total income tax provision
  $ 13,669     $ 14,753     $ 16,564  
 
                 

 

- 64 -


Table of Contents

(b)  
The following is a reconciliation between the statutory U.S. income tax rate and the effective rate derived by dividing the provision for income taxes by earnings before income taxes:
                                                 
Year Ended September 30,   2011     2010     2009  
Computed income taxes at statutory rate
  $ 14,175       35.0 %   $ 14,490       35.0 %   $ 17,263       35.0 %
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from -
                                               
State and local income taxes
    834       2.1       777       1.9       904       1.8  
Foreign tax rate differences
    58       0.1       (87 )     (0.2 )     (43 )     (0.1 )
Qualified domestic production incentives
    (1,025 )     (2.5 )     (786 )     (1.9 )     (870 )     (1.8 )
Bioline Group transaction costs
                434       1.0              
U.S. book-to-return and uncertain tax position activity
    (422 )     (1.0 )     8             (412 )     (0.8 )
Other, net
    49       0.1       (83 )     (0.2 )     (278 )     (0.5 )
 
                                   
 
  $ 13,669       33.8 %   $ 14,753       35.6 %   $ 16,564       33.6 %
 
                                   
(c)  
The components of net deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows:
                 
As of September 30,   2011     2010  
Deferred tax assets -
               
Valuation reserves and non-deductible expenses
  $ 1,529     $ 1,128  
Stock compensation expense not deductible
    2,562       2,313  
Net operating loss carryforwards
    767       740  
Inventory basis differences
    1,322       630  
Other
          125  
 
           
Subtotal
    6,180       4,936  
Less valuation allowance
    (439 )     (439 )
 
           
Deferred tax assets
    5,741       4,497  
 
           
Deferred tax liabilities -
               
Fixed asset basis differences and depreciation
    (731 )     (721 )
Intangible asset basis differences and amortization
    (3,421 )     (4,082 )
Other
    (442 )     (579 )
 
           
Deferred tax liabilities
    (4,594 )     (5,382 )
 
           
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
  $ 1,147     $ (885 )
 
           
For income tax purposes, we have tax benefits related to operating loss carryforwards in the countries of Australia, Belgium and France. These net operating loss carryforwards have no expiration date. We have recorded deferred tax assets for these carryforwards totaling $767 and $740 at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively, inclusive of valuation allowances for the country of Belgium. This valuation allowance is for pre-acquisition net operating loss carryforwards. If tax benefits are recognized in future years for these pre-acquisition net operating loss carryforwards, such benefits will be allocated to reduce goodwill and acquired intangible assets.

 

- 65 -


Table of Contents

The realization of deferred tax assets in foreign jurisdictions is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in these countries. We have considered the levels of currently anticipated pre-tax income in foreign jurisdictions in assessing the required level of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. Taking into consideration historical and current operating results, and other factors, we believe that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset for foreign jurisdictions, after consideration of the valuation allowance, which has been established, will be realized. The amount of the net deferred tax asset considered realizable in foreign jurisdictions, however, could be reduced in future years if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
Undistributed earnings reinvested indefinitely in our non-U.S. operations were approximately $17,000 at September 30, 2011. U.S. deferred tax liabilities of approximately $6,000 on such earnings have not been recorded. We believe that such U.S. taxes would be largely offset by foreign tax credits for taxes paid in non-U.S. jurisdictions.
As described in Note 1, we utilize a comprehensive model for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions, assuming full knowledge of all relevant facts by the applicable tax authorities. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 related to such positions was $542 and $725, respectively, of which the full amounts would favorably affect the effective tax rate if recognized. We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of our income tax provision. During fiscal 2011 and 2010, we (decreased)/increased our tax provision by approximately ($109) and $128, respectively, for such interest and penalties. We had approximately $120 accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at September 30, 2011 compared to $229 accrued at September 30, 2010. The amount of our liability for uncertain tax positions expected to be paid or settled in the next 12 months is uncertain.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
                 
    2011     2010  
Unrecognized income tax benefits beginning of year
  $ 725     $ 572  
Additions for tax positions related to the current year
          67  
Additions for tax positions of prior years
    333       206  
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
    (269 )      
Tax examination settlements
    (4 )      
Expirations of statute of limitations
    (243 )     (120 )
 
           
Unrecognized income tax benefits at end of year
  $ 542     $ 725  
 
           
We are subject to examination by the tax authorities in the U.S. (both federal and state) and the countries of Australia, Belgium, England, France, Germany, Holland and Italy. In the U.S., open tax years are for fiscal 2010 and forward. The IRS has completed its examination of our federal returns for fiscal 2008 and 2009. In countries outside the U.S., open tax years generally range from fiscal 2006 and forward. However, in Belgium, the utilization of local net operating loss carryforwards extends the statute of limitations for examination well into the foreseeable future. Tax examinations in France were completed for fiscal years 2004-2006 during fiscal 2007.

 

- 66 -


Table of Contents

(8) Employee Benefits
(a)  
Savings and Investment Plan - We have a profit sharing and retirement savings plan covering substantially all full-time U.S. employees. Profit sharing contributions to the plan, which are discretionary, are approved by the Board of Directors. The plan permits participants to contribute to the plan through salary reduction. Under terms of the plan, we match 50% of an employee’s contributions, up to maximum match of 3% of eligible compensation. Our discretionary and matching contributions to the plan amounted to approximately $1,228, $1,282 and $1,188, during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(b)  
Stock-Based Compensation Plans - We have one active stock-based compensation plan, the 2004 Equity Compensation plan, which became effective December 7, 2004, as amended (the “2004 Plan”) and an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESP Plan”), which became effective October 1, 1997. Effective October 1, 1997, we began selling shares of stock to our full-time and part-time employees under the ESP Plan up to the number of shares equivalent to a 1% to 15% payroll deduction from an employee’s base salary plus an additional 5% dollar match of this deduction by Meridian.
   
We may grant new shares for options, restricted shares or restricted share units for up to 3,000 shares under the 2004 Plan, of which we have granted 1,501 through September 30, 2011. Options may be granted at exercise prices not less than 100% of the closing market value of the underlying common shares on the date of grant and have maximum terms up to ten years. Vesting schedules are established at the time of grant and may be set based on future service periods, achievement of performance targets, or a combination thereof. All options contain provisions restricting their transferability and limiting their exercise in the event of termination of employment or the disability or death of the optionee. We have granted options for 4,479 shares under similar plans that have expired. We recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments made to employees, based upon the fair value of the share-based payment on the date of the grant.

 

- 67 -


Table of Contents

   
On November 12, 2008, we granted approximately 94 restricted shares to certain employees subject to attainment of a specified earnings target for fiscal 2009. While the dividends were paid on these restricted shares throughout fiscal 2009, the fiscal 2009 target was not met and these restricted shares were cancelled. On November 12, 2009, we granted approximately 105 restricted shares and restricted share units (with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $22.18 per share) to certain employees, with half of each employee’s grant being time-vested restricted shares or restricted share units vesting in total on November 12, 2013, and the remaining half being subject to attainment of a specified earnings target for fiscal 2010. Dividends were paid on these shares and units throughout fiscal 2010. While the 2010 earnings target was not met, on September 30, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors chose to convert the performance-based restricted shares to time-vested restricted shares vesting in total on November 12, 2013. This conversion impacted approximately fifty employees and resulted in expense totaling $472, which was recorded in fiscal 2010 and is included in the total amount of stock-based compensation set forth below. Similarly, during fiscal 2011, we granted approximately 214 restricted shares and restricted share units (with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $22.93 per share) to certain employees, with half of each employee’s grant being time-vested restricted shares or restricted share units vesting in total on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining half being subject to attainment of a specified earnings target for fiscal 2011. While dividends were paid on these shares and units throughout fiscal 2011, the target for fiscal 2011 was not met and the performance-based portion of the restricted shares and restricted share units granted during fiscal 2011 have been cancelled. Giving effect to this cancellation and certain other activities throughout the year, including conversions to common shares, forfeitures, and new hire and promotee grants, approximately 196 restricted shares and restricted share units remain outstanding as of September 30, 2011, with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $22.63 per share, a weighted-average remaining vesting period of 2.32 years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $3,077. The weighted-average grant date fair value of the approximate 18 restricted share units that vested during fiscal 2011 was $22.83 per share.
   
The amount of stock-based compensation expense reported was $2,614, $1,866 and $1,092 in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The fiscal 2011 expense is comprised of $495 related to stock options, $2,009 related to restricted shares and units, and $110 related to the granting of unrestricted commons shares to a retiring director, while the fiscal 2010 expense is comprised of $908 related to stock options and $958 related to restricted shares and units. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for these stock-based compensation arrangements was $865, $665 and $367, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, we expect future stock compensation expense for unvested options and unvested restricted stock and units to total $387 and $1,996, respectively, which will be recognized during fiscal years 2012 through 2015.
   
We recognize compensation expense only for the portion of shares that we expect to vest. As such, we apply estimated forfeiture rates to our compensation expense calculations. These rates have been derived using historical forfeiture data, stratified by several employee groups. During fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded $39, $17 and $42, respectively, in stock compensation expense to adjust estimated forfeiture rates to actual.

 

- 68 -


Table of Contents

   
We have elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine grant-date fair value for stock options, with the following assumptions: (i) expected share price volatility based on average of Meridian’s historical volatility over the options’ expected lives and implied volatility based on the value of tradable call options; (ii) expected life of options based on contractual lives, employees’ historical exercise behavior and employees’ historical post-vesting employment termination behavior; (iii) risk-free interest rates based on treasury rates that correspond to the expected lives of the options; and (iv) dividend yield based on the expected yield on underlying Meridian common stock.
                         
Year ended September 30,   2011     2010     2009  
Risk-free interest rates
    1.91 %     2.93 %     3.75 %
Dividend yield
    3.74 %     3.12 %     2.41 %
Life of option
  5.93 yrs.   5.90 yrs.   6.30-8.20 yrs.
Share price volatility
    34 %     42 %     57 %
Forfeitures (by employee group)
    0%-10 %     0%-10 %     0%-13 %
   
A summary of the status of our stock option plans at September 30, 2011 and changes during the year is presented in the table and narrative below:
                                 
            Wtd Avg     Wtd Avg     Aggregate  
            Exercise     Remaining     Intrinsic  
    Options     Price     Life (Yrs)     Value  
Outstanding beginning of period
    1,425     $ 11.44                  
Grants
    73       22.55                  
Exercises
    (485 )     3.54                  
Forfeitures
    (18 )     23.12                  
Cancellations
    (7 )     22.48                  
 
                       
Outstanding end of period
    988     $ 15.86       5.0515     $ 3,039  
 
                       
 
                               
Exercisable end of period
    859     $ 14.60       4.5635     $ 3,039  
 
                       
   
A summary of the status of our nonvested options as of September 30, 2011, and changes during the year ended September 30, 2011, is presented below:
                 
            Weighted-  
            Average  
            Grant Date  
    Options     Fair Value  
Nonvested beginning of period
    639     $ 3.75  
Granted
    73       4.97  
Vested
    (565 )     2.82  
Forfeited
    (18 )     7.92  
 
           
Nonvested end of period
    129     $ 7.91  
 
           
   
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted was $4.97, $6.70 and $11.05 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $8,038, $813 and $2,560, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total grant-date fair value of options that vested during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $1,594, $1,558 and $2,019, respectively.

 

- 69 -


Table of Contents

   
Cash received from options exercised was $1,721, $592 and $1,243 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Tax benefits realized and recorded to additional paid-in capital from option exercises totaled $1,256, $403 and $233 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(9) Major Customers and Segment Data
Our reportable operating segments are U.S. Diagnostics, European Diagnostics and Life Science. Initial segmentation between Diagnostics and Life Science has been determined based upon products and customers, with further segmentation of Diagnostics between U.S. and European being based upon geographic regions served and management responsibility. The U.S. Diagnostics operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Cincinnati, Ohio, and the sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits in the U.S. and countries outside of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The European Diagnostics operating segment consists of the sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The Life Science operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Memphis, Tennessee; Saco, Maine; Boca Raton, Florida; London, England; Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia, and the sale and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and bioresearch reagents domestically and abroad. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, plans were announced to consolidate the Saco, Maine operations into the Memphis, Tennessee facility, with such consolidation commencing early in the fiscal 2012 first quarter and expected to be completed near the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The Life Science operating segment also includes the contract development and manufacture of cGMP clinical grade proteins and other biologicals for use by biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines.
Sales to individual customers constituting 10% or more of consolidated net sales are as follows:
                                                 
Year Ended September 30,   2011     2010     2009  
Customer A
  $ 29,632       (19 )%   $ 33,821       (24 )%   $ 37,876       (26 )%
Customer B
  $ 18,308       (11 )%   $ 18,204       (13 )%   $ 19,063       (13 )%
Combined international sales for the U.S. Diagnostics and Life Science operating segments were $28,975, $19,350, and $15,568 in fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our focus product families — C. difficile, foodborne and H. pylori — accounted for 44%, 43% and 42% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Approximately 25% of the consolidated accounts receivable balance at September 30, 2011 is largely dependent upon funds from the Italian government. We currently sole-source from a U.S. manufacturer the illumipro-10® instrument on which our illumigene® molecular testing platform operates. Additionally, two of our foodborne products sourced from another vendor accounted for 14%, 11% and 7% of third-party sales for our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

- 70 -


Table of Contents

Significant sales information by country for the European Diagnostics and Life Science operating segments is as follows. Sales are attributed to the geographic area based on the location to which the product is shipped.
                         
Year Ended September 30,   2011     2010     2009  
Italy
  $ 8,544     $ 8,183     $ 8,289  
France
    2,537       2,590       2,939  
United Kingdom
    2,373       2,646       2,373  
Holland
    2,142       2,045       1,828  
Belgium
    1,289       1,291       1,875  
Other countries
    7,302       7,286       8,566  
 
                 
Total European Diagnostics
  $ 24,187     $ 24,041     $ 25,870  
 
                 
                         
Year Ended September 30,   2011     2010     2009  
United States
  $ 15,711     $ 13,907     $ 13,387  
Germany
    4,922       3,376       2,816  
United Kingdom
    4,890       2,575       474  
Australia
    3,105       1,289       845  
France
    1,111       1,318       745  
Other countries
    8,664       4,474       5,167  
 
                 
Total Life Science
  $ 38,403     $ 26,939     $ 23,434  
 
                 
Identifiable assets for our Italian distribution organization were $17,192, $17,378 and $16,797 at September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At September 30, 2011, identifiable assets for the Bioline Group’s operations in the U.K., Germany and Australia totaled approximately $12,825, $5,550 and $2,675, respectively; and totaled $16,990, $4,441 and $3,094, respectively, at September 30, 2010.

 

- 71 -


Table of Contents

Segment information for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
                                         
    U.S.     European                    
    Diagnostics     Diagnostics     Life Science     Elim (1)     Total  
Fiscal Year 2011 -
                                       
Net sales -
                                       
Third-party
  $ 97,133     $ 24,187     $ 38,403     $     $ 159,723  
Inter-segment
    10,322       27       756       (11,105 )      
Operating income (2)
    35,191       2,199       2,595       48       40,033  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,854       116       2,903             5,873  
Capital expenditures
    4,964       77       4,098             9,139  
Goodwill
    1,381             21,743             23,124  
Other intangible assets
    1,604             9,343             10,947  
Total assets
    73,850       19,390       92,467       (30,214 )     155,493  
Fiscal Year 2010 -
                                       
Net sales -
                                       
Third-party
  $ 92,020     $ 24,041     $ 26,939     $     $ 143,000  
Inter-segment
    10,285       20       561       (10,866 )      
Operating income (3)
    33,432       3,367       3,615       724       41,138  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,722       86       1,877             4,685  
Capital expenditures
    1,869       213       1,001             3,083  
Goodwill
    1,381             21,921             23,302  
Other intangible assets
    2,283       9       11,035             13,327  
Total assets
    72,030       18,044       90,388       (25,821 )     154,641  
Fiscal Year 2009 -
                                       
Net sales -
                                       
Third-party
  $ 98,970     $ 25,870     $ 23,434     $     $ 148,274  
Inter-segment
    10,700       6       715       (11,421 )      
Operating income
    39,490       4,459       4,728       102       48,779  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,680       92       1,588             4,360  
Capital expenditures
    2,082       81       1,480             3,643  
Goodwill
    1,381             8,485             9,866  
Other intangible assets
    2,909       24       4,384             7,317  
Total assets
    102,506       18,221       55,592       (20,322 )     155,997  
     
(1)  
Eliminations consist of intersegment transactions.
 
(2)  
U.S. Diagnostics and European Diagnostics include $365 and $875, respectively, related to sales and marketing leadership reorganization costs; and Life Science includes $1,057 related to consolidation of the Maine operations into the Tennessee facility.
 
(3)  
Life Science includes $1,240 of Bioline transaction costs.
                         
Year Ended September 30,   2011     2010     2009  
Segment operating income
  $ 40,033     $ 41,138     $ 48,779  
Interest income
    115       124       456  
Other, net
    352       138       88  
 
                 
Consolidated earnings before income taxes
  $ 40,500     $ 41,400     $ 49,323  
 
                 

 

- 72 -


Table of Contents

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1. Transactions between operating segments are accounted for at established intercompany prices for internal and management purposes with all intercompany amounts eliminated in consolidation.
(10) Commitments and Contingencies
(a)  
Royalty Commitments — We have entered into various license agreements that require payment of royalties based on a specified percentage of the sales of licensed products (1% to 14%). These royalty expenses are recognized on an as-earned basis and recorded in the year earned as a component of cost of sales. Annual royalty expenses associated with these agreements were approximately $1,853, $734 and $572, respectively, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
   
Meridian entered into a license agreement in October 2006 with a third party that provides rights to a molecular technology for infectious disease testing in the United States, Europe and other geographic markets. The agreement, as amended, calls for remaining payments of up to approximately $3,500, based on the achievement of certain product development milestones and on-going royalties once products are available for commercial sale.
(b)  
Purchase Commitments — Excluding the operating lease commitments reflected in Note 10 (c) below, we have purchase commitments primarily for inventory and service items as part of the normal course of business. Commitments made under these obligations are $7,911, $103 and $510 for fiscal 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. No purchase commitments have been made beyond fiscal 2014.
(c)  
Operating Lease Commitments — Meridian and its subsidiaries are lessees of (i) certain office and warehouse buildings in the U.S., Europe and Australia; (ii) automobiles for use by the direct sales forces in the U.S. and Europe; and (iii) certain office equipment such as facsimile and copier machines across all business units, under operating lease agreements that expire at various dates. Amounts charged to expense under operating leases were $1,391, $759 and $775 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Operating lease commitments for each of the five succeeding fiscal years are as follows: fiscal 2012 — $1,119, fiscal 2013 — $779, fiscal 2014 — $412, fiscal 2015 — $330, and fiscal 2016 — $237.
(d)  
Litigation — We are a party to various litigation matters from time to time that we believe are in the normal course of business. The ultimate resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

- 73 -


Table of Contents

(e)  
Indemnifications — In conjunction with certain contracts and agreements, we provide routine indemnifications whose terms range in duration and in some circumstances are not explicitly defined. The maximum obligation under some such indemnifications is not explicitly stated and, as a result, cannot be reasonably estimated. We have not made any payments for these indemnifications and no liability is recorded at September 30, 2011 or September 30, 2010. We believe that if we were to incur a loss on any of these matters, the loss would not have a material effect on our financial condition.
(11) Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The sum of the earnings per common share and cash dividends per share may not equal the corresponding annual amounts due to interim quarter rounding.
                                 
For the Quarter Ended in Fiscal 2011   December 31     March 31     June 30     September 30  
 
                               
 
                               
Net sales
  $ 37,263     $ 41,059     $ 40,052     $ 41,349  
Gross profit
    23,502       25,957       25,351       24,488  
Net earnings
    6,025       7,260       6,836       6,710  
Basic earnings per common share
    0.15       0.18       0.17       0.16  
Diluted earnings per common share
    0.15       0.18       0.17       0.16  
Cash dividends per common share
    0.19       0.19       0.19       0.19  
                                 
For the Quarter Ended in Fiscal 2010   December 31     March 31     June 30     September 30  
 
                               
Net sales
  $ 42,457     $ 31,147     $ 33,857     $ 35,539  
Gross profit
    25,404       20,222       21,803       21,267  
Net earnings
    8,921       5,980       6,424       5,322  
Basic earnings per common share
    0.22       0.15       0.16       0.13  
Diluted earnings per common share
    0.22       0.15       0.16       0.13  
Cash dividends per common share
    0.17       0.19       0.19       0.19  

 

- 74 -


Table of Contents

ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of September 30, 2011, an evaluation was completed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2011. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of internal control that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting, or in other factors that could significantly affect internal control subsequent to September 30, 2011.
Our internal control report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K after Item 8, under the caption “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.

 

- 75 -


Table of Contents

PART III
The information required by Items 10., 11., 12., 13. and 14., of Part III are incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2012 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) and (2) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES.
All financial statements and schedules required to be filed by Item 8 of this Form and included in this report have been so identified under Item 8. No additional financial statements or schedules are being filed since the requirements of paragraph (c) under Item 15 are not applicable to Meridian.
(b) (3) EXHIBITS.
         
Exhibit Number   Description of Exhibit
       
 
  3.1    
Articles of Incorporation, including amendments not related to Company name change (Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement No. 333-02613 on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 1996 and Meridian’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2007)
       
 
  3.2    
Amended Code of Regulations (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 23, 2008)
       
 
  10.1 *  
Savings and Investment Plan Prototype Adoption Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2003)
       
 
  10.2  
Salary Continuation Agreement between Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and John A. Kraeutler, as amended April 24, 2001, December 29, 2008 and August 3, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2011)
       
 
  10.3    
Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1999)
       
 
  10.4  
Employment Agreement Dated February 15, 2001, as amended December 29, 2008 between Meridian and John A. Kraeutler (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009)
       
 
  10.5 *  
Agreement Concerning Disability and Death dated September 10, 2003, between Meridian and William J. Motto (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2003)
       
 
  10.6  
2004 Equity Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated through January 22, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2007 and Form 8-K filed January 28, 2008)

 

- 76 -


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit Number   Description of Exhibit
       
 
  10.7  
Fiscal 2006 Officers’ Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated through January 19, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2006)
       
 
  10.8  
Sample Option Agreement dated November 14, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2007)
       
 
  10.9  
Fiscal 2007 Officers’ Performance Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2006)
       
 
  10.10    
Loan and Security Agreement among Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Meridian Bioscience Corporation, Omega Technologies, Inc. Meridian Life Science, Inc. and Fifth Third Bank dated August 1, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2007)
       
 
  10.10.1    
Amended and Restated Revolving Note with Fifth Third Bank dated August 1, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2007)
       
 
  10.10.2    
First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement among Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Meridian Bioscience Corporation, Omega Technologies, Inc., Meridian Life Science, Inc. and Fifth Third Bank dated September 2, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2010)
       
 
  10.10.3    
Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement among Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Meridian Bioscience Corporation, Omega Technologies, Inc., Meridian Life Science, Inc. and Fifth Third Bank dated December 1, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2010)
       
 
  10.11  
Sample Time-Based Restricted Stock Agreement dated November 12, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009)
       
 
  10.12  
Sample Performance Award Restricted Stock Agreement dated November 12, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009)
       
 
  10.13    
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 20, 2010 among Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Meridian Bioscience Europe, S.A. and Marco Giuseppe Calzavara and Vittorio Giovanni Calzavara (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 23, 2010)
       
 
  10.14  
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. Change in Control Severance Compensation Policy dated March 18, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2011)
       
 
  10.15  
Antonio Interno Retirement-Related Agreements related to retirement as of March 31, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2011)
       
 
  13    
2011 Annual Report to Shareholders (1)
       
 
  14    
Code of Ethics (Incorporated by reference to Meridian’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2003)

 

- 77 -


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit Number   Description of Exhibit
       
 
  21    
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (Filed herewith)
       
 
  23    
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Filed herewith)
       
 
  31.1    
Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) (Filed herewith)
       
 
  31.2    
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) (Filed herewith)
       
 
  32    
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Filed herewith)
     
*  
Management Compensatory Contracts
 
(1)  
Only specific portions of the 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders are incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K as filed herewith. A supplemental paper copy of the 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders has been furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission for informational purposes only.
 
   
Meridian will provide shareholders with any exhibit upon the payment of a specified reasonable fee, which fee shall be limited to Meridian’s reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibit.

 

- 78 -


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
  MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.
 
 
  By:   /s/ John A. Kraeutler    
    Date: November 29, 2011   
    John A. Kraeutler
Chief Executive Officer 
 

 

- 79 -


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
         
Signature   Capacity   Date
 
       
/s/ William J. Motto
 
William J. Motto
  Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors    November 29, 2011
 
       
/s/ John A. Kraeutler
 
John A. Kraeutler
  Chief Executive Officer, Director    November 29, 2011
 
       
/s/ Melissa A. Lueke
 
Melissa A. Lueke
  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary   November 29, 2011
 
       
/s/ James M. Anderson
 
James M. Anderson
  Director    November 29, 2011
 
       
/s/ Gary P. Kreider
 
Gary P. Kreider
   Director   November 29, 2011
 
       
/s/ David C. Phillips
 
David C. Phillips
  Director    November 29, 2011
 
       
/s/ Robert J. Ready
 
Robert J. Ready
  Director    November 29, 2011

 

- 80 -


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE II
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
and Subsidiaries
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
                                         
    Balance at     Charged to                     Balance at  
    Beginning     Costs and                     End of  
Description   of Period     Expenses     Deductions     Other (a)     Period  
Year Ended September 30, 2011:
                                       
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 241     $ 68     $     $ 1     $ 310  
Inventory realizability reserves
    1,130       1,056       (550 )     (1 )     1,635  
Valuation allowances — deferred taxes
    439                         439  
 
                                       
Year Ended September 30, 2010:
                                       
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 247     $ 82     $ (56 )   $ (32 )   $ 241  
Inventory realizability reserves
    1,025       717       (610 )     (2 )     1,130  
Valuation allowances — deferred taxes
    470                   (31 )     439  
 
                                       
Year Ended September 30, 2009:
                                       
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 230     $ 33     $ (26 )   $ 10     $ 247  
Inventory realizability reserves
    1,103       613       (691 )           1,025  
Valuation allowances — deferred taxes
    466                   4       470  
     
(a)  
Balances reflect the effects of currency translation

 

- 81 -