e10vk
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011.
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______________ TO__________________
Commission File No. 0-14902
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.
3471 River Hills Drive
Cincinnati, Ohio 45244
IRS Employer ID No. 31-0888197
Incorporated under the Laws of Ohio
Phone: (513) 271-3700
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange of which registered |
| |
|
Common Shares, No Par Value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
|
|
(NASDAQ Global Select Market) |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES þ NO o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act.
YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted
on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this Chapter) is not contained herein, and will
not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or
any amendment to this Form 10-K.
YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2). YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of Common Shares held by non-affiliates as of March 31,
2011 was $957,367,874 based on a closing sale price of $23.99 per share on March 31, 2011.
As of October 31, 2011, 41,237,445 no par value Common Shares were issued and
outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrants Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011 furnished to the Commission pursuant to Rule 14a-3(b) are incorporated
by reference in Part II as specified and portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement to
be filed with the Commission for its 2012 Annual Shareholders Meeting are incorporated by
reference in Part III as specified.
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. The Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor from civil litigation for forward-looking
statements accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements. Except for historical information,
this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which may be
identified by words such as estimates, anticipates, projects, plans, seeks, may,
will, expects, intends, believes, should and similar expressions or the negative versions
thereof and which also may be identified by their context. Such statements, whether expressed or
implied, are based upon current expectations of the Company and speak only as of the date made.
The Company assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements even
if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results expressed or implied
therein will not be realized. These statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and
other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, including, without limitation,
the following: Meridians continued growth depends, in part, on its ability to introduce into the
marketplace enhancements of existing products or new products that incorporate technological
advances, meet customer requirements and respond to products developed by Meridians competition.
While Meridian has introduced a number of internally developed products, there can be no assurance
that it will be successful in the future in introducing such products on a timely basis. Meridian
relies on proprietary, patented and licensed technologies, and the Companys ability to protect its
intellectual property rights, as well as the potential for intellectual property litigation, would
impact its results. Ongoing consolidations of reference laboratories and formation of
multi-hospital alliances may cause adverse changes to pricing and distribution. Recessionary
pressures on the economy and the markets in which our customers operate, as well as adverse trends
in buying patterns from customers can change expected results. Costs and difficulties in complying
with laws and regulations, including those administered by the United States Food and Drug
Administration, can result in unanticipated expenses and delays and interruptions to the sale of
new and existing products. The international scope of Meridians operations, including changes in
the relative strength or weakness of the U.S. dollar, can make results difficult to predict. One
of Meridians main growth strategies is the acquisition of companies and product lines. There can
be no assurance that additional acquisitions will be consummated or that, if consummated, will be
successful and the acquired businesses will be successfully integrated into Meridians operations.
There may be risks that acquisitions may disrupt operations and may pose potential difficulties in
employee retention and there may be additional risks with respect to Meridians ability to
recognize the benefits of acquisitions, including potential synergies and cost savings or the
failure of acquisitions to achieve their plans and objectives. The Company cannot predict the
possible impact of recently-enacted United States healthcare legislation and any similar
initiatives in other countries on its results of operations. In addition to the factors described
in this paragraph, Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors contains a list and description of uncertainties,
risks and other matters that may affect the Company.
PART I.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements about our business and results
of operations that are subject to risks and uncertainties. See Forward Looking Statements above.
Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed in Item 1A.
Risk Factors. In addition to the risk factors discussed herein, we are also subject to additional
risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial. If any of
these risks and uncertainties develop into actual events, our business, financial condition or
results of operations could be adversely affected.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to Meridian,
we, us, our, or our company refer to Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
In the discussion that follows, all dollars and shares are in thousands (both tables and text),
except per share data.
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
Overview
Meridian is a fully-integrated life science company with principal businesses in (i) the
development, manufacture, sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits, primarily for certain
gastrointestinal, viral, respiratory and parasitic infectious diseases; (ii) the manufacture and
distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and
bioresearch reagents used by researchers and other diagnostic manufacturers; and (iii) the contract
development and manufacture of proteins and other biologicals under cGMP conditions for use by
biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines. The
company was incorporated in Ohio in 1976. Our principal corporate offices are located in
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Our
website is www.meridianbioscience.com. We make available our Annual Reports on Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments thereto, free of
charge through this website, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material has been
electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These
reports may also be read and copied at the SECs public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, DC 20549, phone number 1-800-732-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site containing
these filings and other information regarding Meridian at
www.sec.gov. The information on our
website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
- 4 -
Operating Segments
Our reportable operating segments are U.S. Diagnostics, European Diagnostics and Life Science. The
U.S. Diagnostics operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Cincinnati, Ohio, and
the sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits in the U.S. and countries outside of Europe,
Africa and the Middle East. The European Diagnostics operating segment consists of the sale and
distribution of diagnostic test kits in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The Life Science
operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Memphis, Tennessee; Saco, Maine; Boca
Raton, Florida; London, England; Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia, and the sale and
distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and
bioresearch reagents domestically and abroad. The Life Science operating segment also includes
the contract development and manufacture of proteins and other biologicals for use by
biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines.
Financial information for Meridians operating segments is included in Note 9 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Our primary source of revenues continues to be diagnostic products, which represents 76% of
consolidated net sales for fiscal 2011. Our diagnostic products provide accuracy, simplicity and
speed, enable early diagnosis and treatment of common, acute medical conditions, and provide for
better patient outcomes at reduced costs. We target diagnostics for disease states that (i) are
acute conditions where rapid diagnosis impacts patient outcomes; (ii) have opportunistic
demographic and disease profiles; (iii) are underserved by current diagnostic products; and (iv)
have difficult sample handling requirements. This approach has allowed us to establish significant
market share in our target disease states. The acquisition of the Bioline group of companies
(collectively the Bioline Group) in July 2010 dramatically increased the revenue base for our
Life Science operating segment; revenues for our Life Science operating segment represents 24% of
consolidated net sales for fiscal 2011.
U.S. Diagnostics Operating Segment
Overview
Our U.S. Diagnostics operating segments business focuses on the development, manufacture, sale and
distribution of diagnostic test kits, primarily for certain gastrointestinal, viral, respiratory
and parasitic infectious diseases. In addition to diagnostic test kits, products also include
transport media that store and preserve specimen samples from patient collection to laboratory
testing. Third-party sales for this operating segment were $97,000, $92,000 and $99,000 for fiscal
2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, reflecting a three-year compound annual growth rate of 3%. As
of September 30, 2011, our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment had approximately 290 employees.
Our diagnostic test kits utilize immunodiagnostic and molecular technologies, which test samples of
stool, blood, urine and other body fluids or tissue for the presence of specific infectious
diseases. Specific immunodiagnostic technologies used in our diagnostic test kits include enzyme
immunoassay, immunofluorescence, particle agglutination/aggregation, immunodiffusion, complement
fixation and chemical stains. Additionally, during 2010 we introduced into the marketplace our new
molecular amplification assay, illumigene® C.difficile. The illumigene®
molecular amplification assay detects the presence of the toxin producing region from the C.
difficile DNA, and provides highly accurate results in under an hour. During 2011, we continued
with the development of additional tests for the illumigene® molecular platform,
submitting illumigene® Group B Streptococcus (GBS) to the FDA for approval and we
expect to add three additional tests to the platform over the next 12 months tests for Group A
Streptococcus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bordetella pertussis/ parapertussis.
- 5 -
Our diagnostic products are used principally in the detection of gastrointestinal diseases, such as
antibiotic-associated diarrhea (C. difficile), pediatric diarrhea (Rotavirus and Adenovirus) and
stomach ulcers (H. pylori); foodborne diseases such as Enterohemorrhagic E. coli infection (EHEC)
and Campylobacter jejuni (Campy); viral diseases, such as Mononucleosis, Herpes Simplex, Chicken
Pox and Shingles (Varicella-Zoster) and Cytomegalovirus (organ transplant infections); parasitic
diseases, such as Giardiasis, Cryptosporidiosis and Lyme; and respiratory diseases, such as
Pneumonia, Valley Fever, Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). The primary markets and
customers for these products are reference laboratories and hospitals.
Market Trends
The global market for infectious disease tests continues to expand as new disease states are
identified, new therapies become available, and worldwide standards of living and access to health
care improve. More importantly, within this market there is a continuing shift from conventional
testing, which requires highly trained personnel and lengthy turnaround times for test results, to
more technologically advanced testing, which can be performed by less highly trained personnel and
completed in minutes or hours.
The increasing pressures to contain total health care costs have accelerated the increased use of
diagnostic testing. With rapid and accurate diagnoses of infectious diseases, physicians can
pinpoint appropriate therapies quickly, leading to faster recovery, shorter hospital stays and
lower treatment expense. In addition, these pressures have led to a major consolidation among
reference laboratories and the formation of multi-hospital group purchasing organizations that have
reduced the number of institutional customers for diagnostic products and resulted in changes in
buying practices. Specifically, multi-year exclusive or primary source marketing or distribution
contracts with institutional customers have become more common, replacing less formal distribution
arrangements.
Sales and Marketing
Our U.S. Diagnostics operating segments sales and distribution network in the U.S. consists of a
direct sales force complemented by independent distributors. The use of independent distributors
in the U.S. allows our products to reach any bed-size healthcare facility and also provides our
customers the option to purchase our products direct or through distribution along with other
supplies. For our export markets in Asia, Canada and South America, we use independent
distributors. Two independent distributors in the U.S. accounted for 10% or more of consolidated
net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009: Cardinal Healthcare Corporation and Fisher Scientific.
Our sales to Cardinal were approximately $30,000, $34,000 and $38,000 during fiscal 2011, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Our sales to Fisher were approximately $18,000, $18,000 and $19,000 during
fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
- 6 -
Consolidation of the U.S. healthcare industry is expected to continue and potentially affect our
customers. Industry consolidation puts pressure on pricing and aggregates buying power. In
response, we have looked to multi-year supply agreements with group purchasing organizations and
major reference laboratories to stabilize pricing.
Products and Markets
We have expertise in the development and manufacture of products based on multiple core diagnostic
technologies, each of which enables the visualization and identification of antigen/antibody
reactions for specific pathogens. Our product technologies include DNA amplification, enzyme
immunoassay, immunofluorescence, particle agglutination/aggregation, immunodiffusion, complement
fixation and chemical stains. As a result, we are able to develop and manufacture diagnostic tests
in a variety of formats that satisfy customer needs and preferences, whether in a hospital,
commercial or reference laboratory, or alternate site location. Our product offering consists of
approximately 140 medical diagnostic products.
Sales within our focus product families C. difficile, foodborne and H. pylori accounted for
58%, 51% and 48% of our U.S. Diagnostics operating segments third-party sales during fiscal 2011,
2010 and 2009, respectively. These same product families accounted for 44%, 43% and 42% of
consolidated net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Clostridium difficile
C. difficile, a serious hospital acquired bacterial infection, is our largest product family,
generating approximately $30,000 in global sales for fiscal 2011, or 10% growth from fiscal 2010.
This product family has experienced significant competition over the last three years from new
technologies, including molecular testing platforms. Our illumigene® molecular C.
difficile product has now been available in markets around the world for over 12 months. Sales of
this product were approximately $9,000 and $500 in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. We have just
over 650 placements of illumigene® units worldwide to date, with approximately 90% of
these installed in the U.S. At the present time, it generally takes a customer 90 days from
purchase order placement to become revenue producing a timeframe we are continually working to
reduce. Our illumigene® molecular C. difficile product has restored the C. difficile
product family to positive sales growth and has allowed us to begin to recover lost test volume
from our Toxin products.
- 7 -
Our major competitors in this product family are Cepheid and Becton Dickinson. We believe that we
have two advantages to our competition. First, our instrumentation package has a smaller footprint
and significantly lower cost than those of Cepheid or Becton Dickinson, with no capital outlay
required. We believe that this advantage allows our product to fit into virtually any size
hospital or reference laboratory. Second, we believe that the breadth of our C. difficile product
offerings represents an advantage. With the launch of our molecular product and recent FDA
clearance and submission activities related to our common antigen C. difficile products Premier
C. difficile GDH received FDA clearance in May 2011, and ImmuoCard C. difficile GDH was submitted
to the FDA in July 2011 we believe we are in a unique position to offer a full line of testing
solutions to our clinical laboratory customers around the world to counter the competitive
pressures surrounding this market. Additionally, we hold the only FDA-approved claim for C.
difficile testing in the pediatric population.
Foodborne
Our foodborne product family achieved approximately $18,000 in global sales for fiscal 2011, or
growth of 36%. Our foodborne products include tests for Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and
Campylobacter jejuni (Campy). Approximately 95% of our foodborne product sales are in the U.S. In the U.S.
market, we believe that there are potentially 20 million annual stool cultures that make up the
total available market. At present, we believe that we have a 13% market share for EHEC and a 3%
market share for Campy.
We believe that the primary competition for our foodborne products is laboratory culture methods.
We believe that our products have two principal advantages versus culture methods. The first
principal advantage is test accuracy. Independent evaluations have shown our products to have
higher sensitivity than culture methods. The second principal advantage is improved work flow of
the testing process, resulting in significantly shortened time to test result. Our single-use
rapid products provide a test result in approximately 20 minutes, whereas culture results can take
up to 24-48 hours. Time to test result can be a critical factor in the physicians choice of
therapies, as the mortality rate for EHEC is estimated to be 5% to 10%.
Helicobacter pylori
H. pylori, a bacterium found in the stomach, is a major cause of peptic ulcers and is linked to
duodenal ulcers and stomach cancer. H. pylori represents our second largest product family,
generating approximately $22,000 in global sales for 2011, or 9% growth. We offer both antibody
and direct antigen tests in alternative formats (single-use and high volume batch). Our major
competition in this product family is test-method alternatives, such as serology and urea breath,
and physicians who prescribe symptom-relieving medications without testing. In the U.S., our
strategy has been to partner with managed care companies to promote the health and economic
benefits of a test and treat strategy, and to move physician behavior away from serology-based
testing toward direct antigen testing. In the U.S. market, we believe that there are potentially
30 million annual tests, of which we believe that we currently have a 5% market share.
In European markets, we face a greater number of competitive products for this product family. As
a result, pricing pressures have led to slightly negative sales growth for fiscal 2011 for our
European Diagnostics operating segment.
- 8 -
Research and Development
Our U.S. Diagnostics operating segments research and development organization has expertise in
biochemistry, immunology, mycology, bacteriology, virology, parasitology and molecular biology.
Research and development expenses for the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment for fiscal 2011, 2010
and 2009 were approximately $7,000, $6,000 and $7,000, respectively. This research and development
organization focuses its activities on new applications for our existing technologies, improvements
to existing products and development of new technologies. Research and development efforts may
occur in-house or with collaborative partners. We believe that new product development is a key
source for sustaining revenue growth. The products within our C. difficile, foodborne, and H.
pylori product families were either developed solely in-house, or via collaboration with outside
partners.
The introduction of our molecular amplification assay, illumigene® C.difficile,
introduced in markets around the world over 12 months ago, followed nearly four years of
exploration and development of a molecular-based diagnostic testing technology to complement our
existing antigen/antibody-based testing technologies. As previously noted, the
illumigene® molecular amplification assay detects the presence of a key toxin producing
region from the C. difficile DNA, and provides highly accurate results in under an hour. We
believe this molecular assay uniquely positions us in the market to provide a full line of testing
solutions that will meet the needs of both our domestic and international customers and, as a
result, during 2011 we have continued with the development of additional tests for the
illumigene® molecular platform, submitting illumigene® Group B Streptococcus
(GBS) to the FDA for approval and we expect to add three additional tests to the platform over the
next 12 months tests for Group A Streptococcus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bordetella
pertussis/parapertussis. We currently hold registrations to sell illumigene® in 37
countries, including the U.S., with registrations pending in 5 additional countries.
During fiscal 2008, we launched our first products under our patented TRU rapid test technology.
The design of this technology enhances laboratory safety by containing the specimen in a closed
system during testing as recommended by CDC guidelines. TRU tests also use less space than other
immunoassay technologies, which is an advantage in space-constrained clinical laboratories.
Products using this technology include TRU FLU®, TRU RSV®, TRU
EBV-M® and TRU EBV-G®. TRU Legionella is the latest addition to the TRU line
of products. Legionella was launched in ex-U.S. markets during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011,
and is expected to be available in the U.S. market in fiscal 2012.
Manufacturing
Our immunodiagnostic and molecular products require the production of highly specific and sensitive
antigens, antibodies and primers. While we produce substantially all of our own requirements
including monoclonal antibodies and polyclonal antibodies, plus a variety of fungal, bacterial and
viral antigens, currently a number of the raw materials used in our illumigene®
molecular product are purchased from outside vendors. We believe that we have sufficient
manufacturing and sourcing capacity for anticipated growth in the near term.
- 9 -
Intellectual Property, Patents and Licenses
We own or license U.S. and foreign patents, most of which are for products manufactured by our U.S.
Diagnostics operating segment. Sales of these products are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Product Family |
|
products |
|
|
% of consolidated sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
C. difficile |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
H. pylori |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Respiratory |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total patented products |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The patent for the C. difficile product expires in 2020; the patents for the two H. pylori products
expire between 2016 and 2017; and the patents for the two respiratory products expire in 2022 and
2027. The remaining six patented products for which we own or license patents are spread over
three product families.
In the absence of patent protection, we may be vulnerable to competitors who successfully replicate
our production and manufacturing technologies and processes. Our employees are required to execute
confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements designed to protect our proprietary products.
Government Regulation
Our diagnostic products are regulated by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) as devices pursuant
to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). Under the FDCA, medical devices are classified
into one of three classes (i.e., Class I, II or III). Class I and II devices are not expressly
approved by the FDA, but, instead, are cleared for marketing. Class III devices generally must
receive pre-market approval from the FDA as to safety and effectiveness.
Each of the diagnostic products currently marketed by us in the United States has been cleared by
the FDA pursuant to the 510(k) clearance process or is exempt from such requirements. We believe
that most, but not all, products under development will be classified as Class I or II medical
devices and, in the case of Class II devices, will be eligible for 510(k) clearance; however, we
can make no assurances in this regard.
Sales of our diagnostic products in foreign countries are subject to foreign government regulation,
the requirements of which vary substantially from country to country. The time required to obtain
approval by a foreign country may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval and the
requirements may differ.
Meridians Cincinnati manufacturing facility is certified to ISO 13485.
Seasonal Factors and Sporadic Outbreaks
Our principal business is the sale of a broad range of diagnostic test kits for common
gastrointestinal, viral, upper respiratory and parasitic infectious diseases. Certain infectious
diseases may be seasonal in nature, while others may be associated with sporadic outbreaks, such as
foodborne illnesses, or pandemics such as H1N1 influenza. While we believe that the breadth of our
diagnostic product lines reduces the risk that infections subject to seasonality and sporadic
outbreaks will cause significant variability in diagnostic revenues, we can make no assurance that
revenues will not be impacted period over period by such factors.
- 10 -
European Diagnostics Operating Segment
Our European Diagnostics operating segments business focuses on the sale and distribution of
diagnostic test kits, manufactured both by our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment and by
third-party vendors. Approximately 66% of third-party sales for fiscal 2011 for this operating
segment were products purchased from our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment. Third-party sales for
this operating segment were approximately $24,000, $24,000 and $26,000 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and
2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, the European Diagnostics operating segment had
approximately 40 employees. Our European Diagnostics operating segments sales and distribution
network consists of direct sales forces in Belgium, France, Holland and Italy, and independent
distributors in other European countries, Africa and the Middle East. The European Diagnostics
operating segment maintains a distribution center near Milan, Italy. The primary markets and
customers for this operating segment are hospitals and reference laboratories.
The European Diagnostics operating segments functional currency is the Euro. The translation of
Euros into U.S. dollars is subject to exchange rate fluctuations.
Life Science Operating Segment
Overview
Our Life Science operating segments business focuses on the development, manufacture, sale and
distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and
bioresearch reagents used by researchers and other diagnostic companies, as well as contract
development and manufacturing services under clinical cGMP conditions. Third-party sales for this
operating segment were approximately $38,000, $27,000 and $23,000 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. As of September 30, 2011, our Life Science operating segment had approximately 195
employees.
Most of the revenue for our Life Science operating segment currently comes from the manufacture,
sale and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells
and bioresearch reagents used by researchers and other diagnostic companies. During fiscal 2011,
15% of third-party sales for this segment were to two customers. For one of these two customers,
we have exclusive supply agreements that have annual, automatic renewal provisions. We have a
long-standing relationship with this customer; and although there can be no assurances, we intend
to renew these supply agreements in the normal course of business.
- 11 -
In July 2010, we acquired the Bioline Group and in so doing added important technologies and
capabilities to our Life Science business and complemented our expanding life science product lines
sold into the research, pharmaceutical and commercial diagnostic markets. In addition to
technological capabilities, Bioline also added proprietary know-how in the production of
high-volume nucleotides and PCR enzymes, as well as a growing portfolio of intellectual property in
the form of patents and licenses. The Bioline Group contributed sales
of approximately $15,000 and $2,000 in fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010,
respectively.
Our clinical cGMP protein production facility in Memphis, Tennessee serves as an enabling
technology for process development and large-scale manufacturing for biologicals used in new drugs
and vaccines. The size of the facility is intended to accommodate manufacturing requirements for
Phase I and Phase II clinical trials. The customer base for this aspect of our Life Science
business includes biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as government agencies,
such as the National Institutes of Health. Revenues for our Life Science operating segment, in the
normal course of business, may be affected from quarter to quarter by the timing and nature of
arrangements for contract services work, which may have longer production cycles than our
immunodiagnostic and molecular biology products, as well as buying patterns of major customers.
See Note 1 (i) to the Consolidated Financial Statements herein for revenue recognition policies.
Our revenues for contract services were approximately $3,000, $2,000 and $2,000 in fiscal 2011,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
As a result of the order volume trends in bulk antigens, antibodies and reagents, during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2011, we announced the closure of our Saco, Maine facility, and began the
transfer of our manufacturing operations from this facility to our Memphis, Tennessee facility. We
expect the consolidation of manufacturing operations in Memphis will provide a lower overall cost
structure and should be completed during the second fiscal quarter of 2012. Total costs to
complete the consolidation of facilities are expected to be approximately $2,200, consisting of
fixed asset impairments, inventory impairments, stay bonuses and moving costs, among other similar
items. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we recognized $1,057 of these costs, and the balance
will be recognized during fiscal 2012, primarily during the first half of the fiscal year.
Products, Markets and Growth Strategies
Our Life Science operating segments businesses have been assembled via acquisitions (BIODESIGN
International in fiscal 1999, Viral Antigens in fiscal 2000, OEM Concepts in fiscal 2005, and the
Bioline Group in July 2010). Historically, these businesses were run autonomously. In recent
years, growth strategies have been developed around sales and marketing integration, new product
development integration, and the acquisition of complementary product lines.
- 12 -
Immunodiagnostic products such as antibodies, antigens and reagents are marketed primarily to
diagnostic manufacturing customers as a source of raw materials for their products, or as an
outsourced step in their manufacturing processes. These products are typically sold in bulk
quantities, and may also be custom-designed for a particular manufacturers requirements. Sales
efforts are focused on multi-year supply agreements in order to provide stability in volumes and
pricing. We believe this benefits both us and our customers.
Molecular biology products such as PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides and competent cells are marketed
primarily to research customers. These products are typically sold in small quantities.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses for our Life Science operating segment for fiscal 2011, 2010 and
2009 were approximately $3,000, $2,000 and $1,000, respectively. This research and development
organization is heavily involved in vaccine development and production activities for our cGMP
facility.
Manufacturing and Government Regulation
The cGMP clinical grade proteins that are produced in our Memphis facility are intended to be used
as injectibles, and, as such, they are produced under cGMP Regulations for Biologics and Human
Drugs under the auspices of the FDA. Approval and licensing, following clinical trials, of these
products is the responsibility of the applicant, who owns the rights to each protein. Typically,
the customer is the applicant, not Meridian Life Science.
The Meridian Life Science facilities are ISO 9001:2008 certified and EC 1069:2009 approved, where
appropriate and as required.
Competition
Diagnostics
The market for diagnostic tests is a multi-billion dollar international industry, which is highly
competitive. Many of our competitors are larger than we are with greater financial, research,
manufacturing and marketing resources. Important competitive factors for Meridians products
include product quality, price, ease of use, customer service and reputation. In a broader sense,
industry competition is based upon scientific and technological capability, proprietary know-how,
access to adequate capital, the ability to develop and market products and processes, the ability
to attract and retain qualified personnel, and the availability of patent protection. To the
extent that our product lines do not reflect technological advances, our ability to compete in
those product lines could be adversely affected.
The diagnostic test industry is highly fragmented and segmented. Of importance in the industry are
mid-sized medical diagnostic specialty companies, like Meridian, that offer multiple, broad product
lines and have the ability to deliver new, high value products quickly to the marketplace. Among
the companies with which we compete in the marketing of one or more of our products are the
diagnostic product divisions of Abbott Laboratories Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company, Thermo
Fisher and Siemens. We also compete with smaller companies such as Cepheid, Quidel Corporation and
Alere, Inc.
- 13 -
Life Science
The market for bulk biomedical reagents is highly competitive. Important competitive factors
include product quality, price, customer service, and reputation. We face competitors, many of
which have greater financial, research and development, sales and marketing, and manufacturing
resources, and where sole-source supply arrangements do not exist. From time to time, customers
may choose to manufacture their biomedical reagents in-house rather than purchase from outside
vendors such as Meridian.
The market for contract manufacturing in a validated cGMP facility, such as our Memphis facility,
is also competitive. Important competitive factors include reputation, customer service and price.
Although the product application for this facility was built from our existing expertise in cell
culture manufacturing techniques, we face competitors with greater experience in contract
manufacturing in a clinical cGMP environment.
Acquisitions
Acquisitions have played an important role in the growth of our businesses. Our acquisition
objectives include, among other things, (i) enhancing product offerings; (ii) improving product
distribution capabilities; (iii) providing access to new markets; and/or (iv) providing access to
key biologicals or new technologies that lead to new products. Although we cannot provide any
assurance that we will consummate any additional acquisitions in the future, nor can we provide any
assurance that any acquisitions will accomplish these objectives, we expect that the potential for
acquisitions will continue to provide opportunities for revenues and earnings growth in the future.
International Markets
International markets are an important source of revenue and future growth opportunities for all of
our operating segments. For all operating segments combined, international sales were
approximately $53,000 or 33% of consolidated fiscal 2011 sales, $43,000 or 30% of consolidated
fiscal 2010 sales and $41,000 or 28% of consolidated fiscal 2009 sales. We expect to continue to
look to international markets as a source of new revenues and growth in the future. See Notes 7
and 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information concerning sales, long-lived assets
and deferred tax assets by country.
Environmental
We are a conditionally exempt, small quantity generator of hazardous waste and have a U.S. EPA
identification number. We are in compliance with applicable portions of the federal and state
hazardous waste regulations and have never been a party to any environmental proceeding.
- 14 -
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the
following factors, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, cash flows or
future results. Any one of these factors could cause our actual results to vary materially from
recent results or from anticipated future results. The risks described below are not the only
risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and/or operating results.
Risks Affecting Growth and Profitability of our Business
We may be unable to develop new products and services or acquire products and services on favorable
terms.
The medical diagnostic and life science industries are characterized by ongoing technological
developments and changing customer requirements. As such, our results of operations and continued
growth depend, in part, on our ability in a timely manner to develop or acquire rights to, and
successfully introduce into the marketplace, enhancements of existing products and services or new
products and services that incorporate technological advances, meet customer requirements and
respond to products developed by our competition. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be
successful in developing or acquiring such rights to products and services on a timely basis, or
that such products and services will adequately address the changing needs of the marketplace,
either of which could adversely affect our results of operations.
In addition, we must regularly allocate considerable resources to research and development of new
products, services and technologies. The research and development process generally takes a
significant amount of time from design stage to product launch. This process is conducted in
various stages. During each stage, there is a risk that we will not achieve our goals on a timely
basis, or at all, and we may have to abandon a product in which we have invested substantial
resources.
We may be unable to successfully integrate operations or to achieve expected cost savings from
acquisitions we make.
One of our main growth strategies is the acquisition of companies and/or products. Although
additional acquisitions of companies and products may enhance the opportunity to increase net
earnings over time, such acquisitions could result in greater administrative burdens, increased
exposure to the uncertainties inherent in marketing new products and financial risks of additional
operating costs. The principal benefits expected to result from any acquisitions we make will not
be achieved fully unless we are able to successfully integrate the operations of the acquired
entities with our operations and realize the anticipated synergies, cost savings and growth
opportunities from integrating these businesses into our existing businesses. We cannot provide any
assurance that we will be able to identify and complete additional acquisitions on terms we
consider favorable or that, if completed, will be successfully integrated into our operations.
- 15 -
Revenues for our diagnostic operating segments may be impacted by our reliance upon two key
distributors, seasonal factors and sporadic outbreaks, and changing diagnostic market conditions.
Key Distributors
Our U.S. Diagnostic operating segments sales through two distributors were 49% and 57%,
respectively, of the U.S. Diagnostics operating segments total sales for fiscal 2011 and 2010, or
30% and 36%, respectively, of our consolidated sales for fiscal 2011 and 2010. These parties
distribute our products and other laboratory products to end-user customers. The loss of either of
these distributors could negatively impact our sales and results of operations unless suitable
alternatives were timely found or lost sales to one distributor were absorbed by another
distributor. Finding a suitable alternative on satisfactory terms may pose challenges in our
industrys competitive environment. As an alternative, we could expand our efforts to distribute
and market our products directly. This alternative, however, would require substantial investment
in additional sales, marketing and logistics resources, including hiring additional sales and
customer service personnel, which would significantly increase our future selling, general and
administrative expenses.
In addition, buying patterns of these two distributors may fluctuate from quarter to quarter,
potentially leading to uneven concentration levels on a quarterly basis.
Seasonal Factors and Sporadic Outbreaks
Our principal business is the sale of a broad range of diagnostic test kits for common
gastrointestinal, viral, upper respiratory and parasitic infectious diseases. Certain infectious
diseases may be seasonal in nature, while others may be associated with sporadic outbreaks, such as
foodborne illnesses, or pandemics such as H1N1 influenza. While we believe that the breadth of our
diagnostic product lines reduces the risk that infections subject to seasonality and sporadic
outbreaks will cause significant variability in diagnostic revenues, we can make no assurance that
revenues will not be negatively impacted period over period by such factors.
Changing Diagnostic Market Conditions
Changes in the healthcare delivery system have resulted in major consolidation among reference
laboratories and in the formation of multi-hospital alliances, reducing the number of institutional
customers for diagnostic test products. Consolidation in the U.S. healthcare industry has also led
to the creation of group purchasing organizations (GPOs) that aggregate buying power for hospital
groups and put pressure on our selling prices. Due to such consolidation, we may not be able to
enter into and/or sustain contractual or other marketing or distribution arrangements on a
satisfactory commercial basis with institutional customers and GPOs, which could adversely affect
our results of operations.
- 16 -
We could be adversely affected by healthcare reform legislation.
Third-party payers for medical products and services, including state and federal governments, are
increasingly concerned about escalating health care costs and can indirectly affect the pricing or
the relative attractiveness of our products by regulating the maximum amount of reimbursement they
will provide for diagnostic testing services. Following years of increasing pressure, during 2010
the U.S. government enacted comprehensive healthcare reform. At present, given the infancy of the
enacted reform, we are unable to predict what effect the legislation might ultimately have on
reimbursement rates for our products. If reimbursement amounts for diagnostic testing services are
decreased in the future, such decreases may reduce the amount that will be reimbursed to hospitals
or physicians for such services and consequently could place constraints on the levels of overall
pricing, which could have a material effect on our sales and/or results of operations.
In addition, this legislation established a 2.3% excise tax on the sales of medical devices
beginning in 2013. At existing sales levels in our U.S. markets, this would result in an annual
excise tax in excess of $2,000 for our company. It is unknown at the present time whether this
cost can be passed on to customers.
Revenues for our Life Science operating segment may be impacted by customer concentrations and
buying patterns.
Our Life Science operating segments sales of purified antigens and reagents to two customers were
15% and 27%, respectively, of the Life Science operating segments total sales for fiscal 2011 and
fiscal 2010, or 4% and 5%, respectively, of our consolidated sales for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010.
For one of these two customers, we have exclusive supply agreements that have annual, automatic
renewal provisions. Although we have a long-standing relationship with this customer, we cannot
provide any assurance that we will be able to renew these supply agreements, which could adversely
affect our sales and results of operations.
Our Life Science operating segment has four other significant customers who purchase antigens,
antibodies and reagents, which together comprised 10% and 13%, respectively, of the operating
segments total sales for fiscal 2011 and 2010. Any significant alteration of buying patterns from
these customers could adversely affect our period over period sales and results of operations.
Revenues relating to research, development and manufacturing services for our Life Science
operating segment are generated on a contract by contract basis. The nature of this business is
such that each contract provides a unique product and/or service and corresponding revenue stream.
Although we believe that future prospects for this business will generate targeted growth rates,
there can be no assurance that future contracts will be secured, and if secured, will be
profitable.
- 17 -
Intense competition could adversely affect our profitability.
The markets for our products and services are characterized by substantial competition and rapid
change. Hundreds of companies in the United States supply immunodiagnostic tests and purified
reagents. These companies range from multinational healthcare entities, for which
immunodiagnostics is one line of business, to small start-up companies. Many of our competitors
have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do.
We cannot provide any assurance that our products and services will be able to compete successfully
with the products and services of our competitors.
In recent years, molecular tests have been introduced for the first time into the C. difficile
market, which is a significant source of revenues for us. Our ability to continue to successfully
compete in the C. difficile market is partly dependent upon the success and market acceptance of
our own molecular-based product, illumigene® C. difficile.
We depend on international sales, and our financial results may be adversely impacted by foreign
currency, regulatory or other developments affecting international markets.
We sell products and services into approximately 60 countries. Approximately 33% of our net sales
for fiscal 2011 and approximately 30% of our net sales for fiscal 2010 were attributable to
international markets. For fiscal 2011, 43% of our international sales were made in Euros and 40%
were made in U.S. dollars, with the remaining 17% being a combination of the British pound and the
Australian dollar. We are subject to the risks associated with fluctuations in the exchange rates
for the Australian dollar, British pound and Euro to the U.S. dollar. We are also subject to other
risks associated with international operations, including longer customer payment cycles, tariff
regulations, requirements for export licenses, instability of foreign governments, and governmental
requirements with respect to the importation and distribution of medical devices and
immunodiagnostic and molecular biology reagents, all of which may vary by country.
Risks Affecting our Manufacturing Operations
We are subject to comprehensive regulation, and our ability to earn profits may be restricted by
these regulations.
Medical device diagnostics and the manufacture, sale and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies
and reagents are highly regulated industries. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able
to obtain necessary governmental clearances or approvals or timely clearances or approvals to
market future products in the United States and other countries. Costs and difficulties in
complying with laws and regulations administered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, the
Centers for Disease Control or other regulators can result in unanticipated expenses and delays and
interruptions to the sale of new and existing products. Contract manufacturing of proteins and
other biologicals is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Regulatory approval can be a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process, making the timing and costs
of approvals difficult to predict. The failure to comply with these regulations can result in
delay in obtaining authorization to sell products, seizure or recall of products, suspension or
revocation of authority to manufacture or sell products, and other civil or criminal sanctions.
- 18 -
Significant interruptions in production at our principal manufacturing facilities and/or
third-party manufacturing facilities would adversely affect our business and operating results.
Products and services manufactured at our Cincinnati, Ohio; Boca Raton, Florida; Memphis,
Tennessee; Saco, Maine; London, England; Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia facilities
comprised 73% of our Diagnostics revenues and 82% of our Life Science revenues. Our global supply
of these products and services is dependent on the uninterrupted and efficient operation of these
facilities. In addition, we currently rely on a small number of third-party manufacturers to
produce certain of our diagnostic products and product components. The operations of our
facilities or these third-party manufacturing facilities could be adversely affected by power
failures, natural or other disasters, such as earthquakes, floods, tornadoes or terrorist threats.
Although we carry insurance to protect against certain business interruptions at our facilities,
there can be no assurance that such coverage will be adequate or that such coverage will continue
to remain available on acceptable terms, if at all. Any significant interruption in the Companys
or third-party manufacturing capabilities could materially and adversely affect our operating
results.
We depend on sole-source suppliers for certain critical components and products. A supply
interruption could adversely affect our business.
Our products are made from a wide variety of raw materials that are generally available from
multiple sources of supply. However, certain critical raw materials and supplies required for the
production of some of our principal products are available only from a single supplier. In
addition, certain finished products, for which we act as a distributor, are available only from a
single supplier. If these suppliers become unable or unwilling to supply the required raw
materials or products, we would need to find another source, and perform additional development
work and obtain regulatory approvals for the use of the alternative raw materials for our products.
Completing that development and obtaining such approvals could require significant time and
resources, and may not occur at all. Any disruption in the supply of these raw materials or
finished products could have a material adverse affect on us.
We currently sole-source from a U.S. manufacturer the illumipro-10® instrument on which
our illumigene® molecular testing platform operates. Additionally, two of our foodborne
products sourced from another vendor accounted for 14%, 11% and 7% of third-party sales for our
U.S. Diagnostics operating segment in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
- 19 -
Risks Related to Intellectual Property and Product Liability
We may be unable to protect or obtain proprietary rights that we utilize or intend to utilize.
In developing and manufacturing our products, we employ a variety of proprietary and patented
technologies. In addition, we have licensed, and expect to continue to license, various
complementary technologies and methods from academic institutions and public and private companies.
We cannot provide any assurance that the technologies that we own or license provide protection
from competitive threats or from challenges to our intellectual property. In addition, we cannot
provide any assurances that we will be successful in obtaining licenses or proprietary or patented
technologies in the future.
Product infringement claims by other companies could result in costly disputes and could limit our
ability to sell our products.
Litigation over intellectual property rights is prevalent in the diagnostic industry. As the
market for diagnostics continues to grow and the number of participants in the market increases, we
may increasingly be subject to patent infringement claims. It is possible that a third-party may
claim infringement against us. If found to infringe, we may attempt to obtain a license to such
intellectual property; however, we may be unable to do so on favorable terms, or at all.
Additionally, if our products are found to infringe on third-party intellectual property, we may be
required to pay damages for past infringement and lose the ability to sell certain products,
causing our revenues to decrease. We currently carry intellectual property insurance that covers
damages and defense costs from our potential infringement on other third-party patents at levels
that we believe are commercially reasonable, although there is no assurance that it will be
adequate to cover claims that may arise. Any substantial underinsured loss resulting from such a
claim could have a material adverse affect on our profitability and the damage to our reputation in
the industry could have a material adverse affect on our business.
If product liability lawsuits are successfully brought against us, we may incur substantial
liabilities and may have to limit or cease sales of our products.
The testing, manufacturing and marketing of medical diagnostic products involves an inherent risk
of product liability claims. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability
claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit or cease sales of our
products. We currently carry product liability insurance at a level we believe is commercially
reasonable, although there is no assurance that it will be adequate to cover claims that may arise.
In certain customer contracts, we indemnify third parties for certain product liability claims
related to our products. These indemnification obligations may cause us to pay significant sums of
money for claims that are covered by these indemnifications. In addition, a defect in the design
or manufacture of our products could have a material adverse affect on our reputation in the
industry and subject us to claims of liability for injury and otherwise. Any substantial
underinsured loss resulting from such a claim could have a material adverse affect on our
profitability and the damage to our reputation in the industry could have a material adverse affect
on our business.
- 20 -
Other Risks Affecting Our Business
Our business could be negatively affected if we are unable to attract, hire and retain key
personnel.
Our future success depends on our continued ability to attract, hire and retain highly qualified
personnel, including our executive officers and scientific, technical, sales and marketing
employees, and their ability to manage growth successfully. If such key employees were to leave
and we were unable to obtain adequate replacements, our operating results could be adversely
affected.
Our bank credit agreement imposes restrictions with respect to our operations.
Our bank credit agreement contains a number of financial covenants that require us to meet certain
financial ratios and tests. If we fail to comply with the obligations in the credit agreement, we
would be in default under the credit agreement. If an event of default is not cured or waived, it
could result in acceleration of any indebtedness under our credit agreement, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business. At the present time, no borrowings are outstanding under
our bank credit agreement.
We face risks related to global economic conditions.
We currently generate significant operating cash flows, which combined with access to the credit
markets provides us with discretionary funding capacity for research and development and other
strategic activities. Current uncertainty in global economic conditions poses a risk to the
overall economy that could impact demand for our products, as well as our ability to manage normal
commercial relationships with our customers, suppliers and creditors, including financial
institutions. If global economic conditions deteriorate significantly, our business could be
negatively impacted, including such areas as reduced demand for our products from a slow-down in
the general economy, supplier or customer disruptions resulting from tighter credit markets and/or
temporary interruptions in our ability to conduct day-to-day transactions through our financial
intermediaries involving the payment to or collection of funds from our customers, vendors and
suppliers.
Approximately $4,900 of our accounts receivable at September 30, 2011 is due from Italian hospital
customers whose funding ultimately comes from the Italian government. The magnitude of the
sovereign debt crisis in Europe, and Italy in particular, is significant. We have experienced a
deterioration in the aging of our Italian accounts receivable and continue to monitor the situation
closely.
- 21 -
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 1,000 shares of undesignated preferred
stock and to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting
rights, of such shares without any future vote or action by the shareholders. The issuance of
preferred stock under certain circumstances could have the effect of delaying or preventing a
change in control of our company. Ohio corporation law contains provisions that may discourage
takeover bids for our company that have not been negotiated with the board of directors. Such
provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of
our common stock. In addition, sales of substantial amounts of such shares in the public market
could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise additional
capital at a price favorable to us.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
- 22 -
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
Our corporate offices, U.S. Diagnostics manufacturing facility and U.S. Diagnostics research and
development facility are located in four buildings totaling approximately 114,000 square feet on 10
acres of land in the Village of Newtown, a suburb of Cincinnati, Ohio. These properties are owned
by us. We have approximately 39,000 square feet of manufacturing space and 14,000 square feet of
warehouse space in these facilities. Included within these properties is an approximately 21,000
square foot building located on 3.5 acres of land within one mile of our primary headquarters
facility. Since purchasing this property in September 2009, we have transformed the property into
a state-of-the-art facility, which as of July 2011 houses our research and development operations
and our sales and marketing departments. The facility is called the Meridian Innovation Center and
was designed to stimulate our product development and marketing efforts.
Our European Diagnostics distribution center in Italy conducts its operations in a two-story
building near Milan, consisting of approximately 18,000 square feet. This facility is owned by our
wholly-owned Italian subsidiary, Meridian Bioscience Europe s.r.l. We also rent office space in
Nice, France; Paris, France; and Nivelles, Belgium for sales and administrative functions.
Our Life Science operations are conducted in several facilities in Saco, Maine; Memphis, Tennessee;
and Boca Raton, Florida, as well as the Bioline Group facilities located in Boston, Massachusetts;
London, England; Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia. Our facility in Memphis, Tennessee
consists of two buildings totaling approximately 44,000 square feet, including approximately 27,000
square feet of manufacturing space, and is owned by us. Our leased facility in Boca Raton, Florida
contains approximately 7,500 square feet of manufacturing space. Our facility in Saco, Maine, the
operations of which we are in the process of consolidating with the Memphis facility, contains
approximately 23,000 square feet for manufacturing, sales, distribution and administrative
functions. In anticipation of the consolidation of the Maine operations with the Tennessee
location being completed during the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we are marketing the property
for sale or lease. Following are details of the Bioline Group facilities, all of which are leased:
Boston approximately 10,000 square feet of sales and warehouse space; London approximately
9,000 square feet of sales, warehouse, distribution, research and development, manufacturing and
administrative office space; Luckenwalde approximately 9,000 square feet of sales, warehouse and
manufacturing space; Sydney approximately 3,000 square feet of sales, warehouse, research and
development and manufacturing space.
- 23 -
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to various litigation matters that we believe are in the normal course of business.
The ultimate resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. No material provision has been made in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements for these matters.
ITEM 4.
[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
PART II.
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON
EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Refer to Forward Looking Statements following the Index in front of the Form 10-K and Item 1A
Risk Factors on Pages 15 through 22 of this Annual Report.
Common Stock Information on the inside back cover of the Annual Report to Shareholders for 2011
and Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) relating to our dividends in Note 11 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements are incorporated herein by reference. Except as may otherwise be prohibited
by applicable law, there are no restrictions on cash dividend payments.
Historically, our cash dividend policy has been to set the indicated annual dividend rate between
75% and 85% of each fiscal years expected net earnings. However, during each of fiscal 2011 and
fiscal 2010, years of significant investment in our foundation for the future (e.g.,
illumigene® molecular technology development/launch, ongoing development of new products
for the molecular platform, Bioline Group acquisition, etc.), our indicated annual dividend rate of
$0.76 per share was 117% of diluted earnings per share. Based upon published fiscal 2012 earnings
guidance, management expects the annual indicated dividend to be between approximately 85% and 89%
of fiscal 2012 diluted earnings per share, although no assurances can be made in this regard. The
declaration and amount of dividends will be determined by the Board of Directors in its discretion
based upon its evaluation of earnings, cash flow requirements and future business developments and
opportunities, including acquisitions.
We paid dividends of $0.76 per share, $0.74 per share and $0.65 per share in fiscal 2011, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, there were approximately 1,000 holders of record and approximately 18,100
beneficial owners of our common shares.
- 24 -
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Incorporated by reference from inside front cover of the Annual Report to Shareholders for 2011.
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Refer to Forward Looking Statements following the Index in front of this Form 10-K and Item 1A
Risk Factors on pages 15 through 22 of this Annual Report.
In the discussion that follows, all amounts are in thousands (both tables and text), except per
share data.
Results of Operations:
Fourth Quarter
Net earnings for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 increased 26% to $6,710, or $0.16 per diluted
share, from net earnings for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 of $5,322, or $0.13 per diluted
share. This increase reflects the combined effects of both increased sales and increased operating
expenses, in large part resulting from the Bioline Group, which was acquired on July 20, 2010.
Additionally, the fiscal 2011 fourth quarter includes $1,057 of costs associated with the
consolidation of the Saco, Maine operations into the Memphis, Tennessee facility (impact on net
earnings of $691, or $0.02 per diluted share). Sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 were
$41,349, an increase of $5,810, or 16%, compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, reflecting
the impact of a full quarter of Bioline Group sales and increased sales across all of our
diagnostic focus product families: C. difficile, Foodborne and H. pylori.
Sales for the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 increased
14% compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, reflecting growth across all of our focus
product families ranging from 12% growth in H. pylori products to 29% growth in our C. difficile
product family. Fourth quarter 2011 sales for our European Diagnostics operating segment increased
7% compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 due primarily to a positive currency effect. On
an organic basis, which excludes the effects of currency translation, sales for our European
Diagnostics operating segment decreased 4% during the fourth quarter, reflecting the ongoing
effects of significant competitive pressures in the C. difficile and H. pylori product families.
Largely as a result of the Bioline Group, sales for our Life Science segment experienced a 27%
increase in sales during this period. Excluding the effect of the Bioline Group, sales of our Life
Science operating segment increased by 8% during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
- 25 -
Fiscal Year
Net
earnings for fiscal 2011 increased 1% to $26,831, or $0.65 per diluted share, from net earnings
for fiscal 2010 of $26,647, or $0.65 per diluted share. Fiscal 2011 net earnings includes $691
($1,057 excluding the income tax effect), or $0.02 per diluted share, associated with the
consolidation of the Saco, Maine operations into the Memphis, Tennessee facility, and $872 ($1,240
excluding the income tax effect), or $0.02 per diluted share, related to costs incurred in
connection with the reorganization of our sales and marketing leadership during the second quarter
of fiscal 2011. Fiscal 2010 net earnings, on the other hand, includes $1,240, or $0.03 per diluted
share, of Bioline Group transaction costs. Results of operations for fiscal 2011 compared to
fiscal 2010 are discussed below.
Non-GAAP Information
The tables below provide information on net earnings, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings
per share, excluding the effect of costs associated with the consolidation of our Saco, Maine
operations into our Memphis, Tennessee facility (fiscal 2011), costs of reorganizing our sales and
marketing leadership (fiscal 2011) and transaction costs associated with the acquisition of the
Bioline Group (fiscal 2010), each of which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as well as
reconciliations to amounts reported under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We
believe that this information is useful to those who read our financial statements and evaluate our
operating results because:
1. |
|
These measures help to appropriately evaluate and compare the results of operations from
period to period by removing the impact of non-routine costs related to consolidating the
Maine operations (fiscal 2011) and reorganizing our sales and marketing leadership (fiscal
2011), and the one-time transaction costs related to the acquisition of the Bioline Group
(fiscal 2010); and |
2. |
|
These measures are used by our management for various purposes, including evaluating
performance against incentive bonus achievement targets, comparing performance from period to
period in presentations to our Board of Directors, and as a basis for strategic planning and
forecasting. |
- 26 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net Earnings - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP basis |
|
$ |
26,831 |
|
|
$ |
26,647 |
|
|
$ |
32,759 |
|
Sales & Marketing Leadership Reorganization (1) |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility consolidation costs (1) |
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs for Bioline Group acquisition (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted earnings |
|
$ |
28,394 |
|
|
$ |
27,887 |
|
|
$ |
32,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings per Basic Common Share - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP basis |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
Sales & Marketing Leadership Reorganization (1) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility consolidation costs (1) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs for Bioline Group acquisition (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Basic EPS |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings per Diluted Common Share - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP basis |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
Sales & Marketing Leadership Reorganization (1) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility consolidation costs (1) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs for Bioline Group acquisition (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts are net of income tax effects of $368 and $366 for the leadership reorganization and the facility
consolidation costs, respectively, which were calculated using the effective tax rates of the jurisdictions in which
the costs were incurred. |
|
(2) |
|
Since the Bioline Group transaction costs were not deductible, there are no income tax effects. |
Revenue Overview:
Our Diagnostics operating segments provide the largest share of our consolidated revenues, 76%, 81%
and 84% for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The percentage decline from fiscal 2010 to
2011 results primarily from the addition of the Bioline Group to our Life Science operating
segment. Sales from our focus families (C. difficile,
Foodborne and H. pylori) comprised 58% of
our Diagnostics operating segments revenues during fiscal 2011.
The overall revenue change for our Diagnostics operating segments during fiscal 2011 was an
increase of 5%, reflecting growth in all of our focus product families. The levels of growth
ranged from 9% in our H. pylori products to 36% in our foodborne products family. C. difficile
revenue, which had declined 18% and 2% in 2010 and 2009, respectively, increased 10% in fiscal
2011. Respiratory product sales declined 26% as a result of the end of the H1N1 influenza pandemic
in December 2009. However, sales of non-influenza respiratory products declined only 1%. On an
organic basis, which excludes the effects of currency translation, sales of our European Diagnostic
operating segment decreased by 2% in fiscal 2011, reflecting the combined effects of decreases in
our C. difficile, respiratory and H. pylori product families, partially offset by growth in our
foodborne product sales.
- 27 -
C. difficile Products
Our illumigene® molecular C. difficile product has now been available in markets around
the world for over 12 months. Sales of this product were approximately $9,000 and $500 in fiscal
2011 and 2010, respectively. We have just over 650 placements of illumigene® units
worldwide to date, with approximately 90% of these installed in the U.S. At the present time, it
generally takes a customer 90 days from purchase order placement to become revenue producing a
timeframe we are continually working to reduce. Our illumigene® molecular C. difficile
product has restored the C. difficile product family to positive sales growth, 10% in fiscal 2011,
and has allowed us to begin to recover lost test volume from our Toxin products.
Our major competitors in this product family are Cepheid and Becton Dickinson. We believe that we
have two principal advantages versus our competition. First, our instrumentation package has a
smaller footprint and significantly lower cost than either Cepheid or Becton Dickinson. We believe
that this advantage allows our product to fit into virtually any size hospital or reference
laboratory. We believe that our second principal advantage is the breadth of our C. difficile
product offerings. With the launch of our molecular product and recent FDA clearance and
submission activities related to our common antigen C. difficile products Premier C. difficile
GDH received FDA clearance in May 2011, and ImmunoCard C. difficile GDH was submitted to the FDA in
July 2011 we believe we are in a unique position to offer a full line of testing solutions to our
clinical laboratory customers around the world to counter the competitive pressures surrounding
this market. Additionally, we hold the only FDA-approved claim for C. difficile testing in the
pediatric population. During July, we submitted to the FDA our second molecular test for the
illumigene® molecular platform, illumigene® Group B Streptococcus (GBS), and
over the next 12 months, we expect the following additional tests for the platform Group A
Streptococcus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis to clear formal
clinical trials and be submitted to the FDA for marketing clearance.
Foodborne Products
During fiscal 2011, sales of our foodborne products increased approximately 35% for our U.S.
Diagnostics operating segment and approximately 39% for our European Diagnostics operating segment
on an organic basis. As was experienced in fiscal 2010, the revenue increases in this product
family continue to reflect the volume growth in our new foodborne products launched in recent
years. Additionally, the European Diagnostics operating segments growth reflects the effects of
the Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) infection outbreak in Europe during the third quarter of
fiscal 2011. The market acceptance and volume growth of these products has resulted in global
revenues for this disease family growing nearly five-fold since fiscal 2007, with foodborne fast
approaching a $20,000 product family.
We believe that the primary competition for our foodborne products is laboratory culture methods.
We believe that our products have two principal advantages versus culture methods. The first
principal advantage is test accuracy. Independent evaluations have shown our products to have
higher sensitivity than culture methods. The second principal advantage is improved work flow of
the testing process, resulting in significantly shortened time to test result. Our single-use rapid
products provide a test result in approximately 20 minutes, whereas culture results can take up to
24-48 hours. Time to test result can be a critical factor in the physicians choice of therapies.
- 28 -
H. pylori Products
During fiscal 2011, sales of our H. pylori products grew 14% for our U.S. Diagnostics operating
segment and declined 3% for our European Diagnostics operating segment on an organic basis,
compared to the year-over-year sales level increases these operating segments experienced in 2010
of 15% and 1%, respectively. The increases for our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment continue to
reflect the benefits of our partnerships with managed care companies in promoting the health and
economic benefits of a test and treat strategy, and the ongoing effects of such strategy moving
physician behavior away from serology-based testing toward direct antigen testing. We expect that
our efforts with managed care companies in the U.S. will provide low to mid-teens growth
opportunities for the next several years. The sales results for our European Diagnostics operating
segment reflect the ongoing impact of pricing pressures from competitive products in European
markets.
Respiratory Products
During fiscal 2011, respiratory sales for our Diagnostics operating segments decreased 26% compared
to fiscal 2010, following a 25% year-over-year decrease from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010. The
dramatic sales fluctuation for this family is a direct result of the end of the novel A (H1N1)
outbreak in December 2009. Total non-influenza respiratory product sales remained relatively flat
compared to fiscal 2010, with sales of such products decreasing 3% for our U.S. Diagnostics
operating segment and increasing 10% for our European Diagnostics operating segment on an organic
basis. At present, we do not expect a significant revenue contribution from influenza products in
fiscal 2012.
Group Purchasing Organizations
In our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment, consolidation of the U.S. healthcare industry over the
last several years has led to the creation of group purchasing organizations (GPOs) that aggregate
buying power for hospital groups and put pressure on our selling prices. We have multi-year supply
agreements with several GPOs. During fiscal 2011, we experienced approximately $1,000 in
unfavorable price variance, as a result of these agreements. However, these agreements help secure
our products with these customers and have led to new business. While in the near term this has
negatively impacted gross profit, further increases in volumes are expected from these contracts.
Foreign Currency
Favorable currency exchange rates resulted in approximately $600 of additional revenue being
recognized by our European Diagnostics operating segment during fiscal 2011, compared to currency
exchange rates having virtually no impact on the fiscal 2010 consolidated sales results. During
fiscal 2009, currency exchange rates had an approximate $2,400 unfavorable impact on revenue.
- 29 -
Life Science Operating Segment
Sales for our Life Science operating segment increased 43% in fiscal 2011, due primarily to a
$15,000 revenue contribution from the Bioline Group acquired in July 2010. Excluding the impact of
the Bioline Group, sales for the operating segment declined 5% for the year, as this business
continues to experience both pricing pressure and reduced order volumes in bulk antigens,
antibodies and related reagents. For fiscal 2012, we expect overall revenue growth of our Life
Science operating segment to be in the range of 5% to 6%, led by the Bioline Group, which we expect
to generate double-digit increases in sales of its molecular reagent products. We expect sales of
our bulk antigen, antibody and reagent products to decline slightly in fiscal 2012 due to a slowing
immunoassay demand profile.
As a result of the order volume trends in bulk antigens, antibodies and reagents, during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2011, we announced the closure of our Saco, Maine facility, and began the
consolidation of our manufacturing operations from this facility with our Memphis, Tennessee
facility. We expect the consolidation of manufacturing operations in Memphis will provide a lower
overall cost structure and should be completed during the second fiscal quarter of 2012. Total
costs to complete the consolidation of facilities are expected to be approximately $2,200,
consisting of fixed asset impairments, inventory impairments, stay
bonuses and moving costs, among other
similar items. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we recognized $1,057 of these costs, and
the balance will be recognized during fiscal 2012, primarily during the first half of the fiscal
year.
Significant Customers
Our U.S. Diagnostic operating segments sales through two national distributors were 49% of the
U.S. Diagnostics operating segments total sales, or 30% of consolidated sales, for fiscal 2011.
This compares to fiscal 2010, in which sales through these distributors comprised 57% of U.S.
Diagnostics operating segment sales and 36% of consolidated sales. The lower percentage of sales
reflects the fact that the majority of our illumigene® product sales are direct, as well
as the comparative decline in these distributors inventory stocking of influenza and other
products.
Our Life Science operating segments sales of purified antigens and reagents to two diagnostic
manufacturing customers were 15% of the Life Science operating segments total sales for fiscal
2011 or 4% of our consolidated sales for fiscal 2011, compared to 27% and 5% of fiscal 2010 Life
Science operating segment and consolidated sales, respectively. The lower percentage of sales
results primarily from the addition of the Bioline Group.
- 30 -
Operating Segment Revenues:
Our reportable operating segments are U.S. Diagnostics, European Diagnostics and Life Science. The
U.S. Diagnostics operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Cincinnati, Ohio, and
the sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits in the U.S. and countries outside of Europe,
Africa and the Middle East. The European Diagnostics operating segment consists of the sale and
distribution of diagnostic test kits in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The Life Science
operating segment consists of manufacturing operations in Memphis, Tennessee; Saco, Maine; Boca
Raton, Florida; London, England; Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia, and the sale and
distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and
bioresearch reagents domestically and abroad. The Life Science operating segment also includes
the contract development and manufacture of proteins and other biologicals for use by
biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines.
Revenues for the Diagnostics operating segments, in the normal course of business, may be affected
by buying patterns of major distributors, seasonality and strength of certain diseases, and foreign
currency exchange rates. Revenues for the Life Science operating segment, in the normal course of
business, may be affected by the timing and nature of arrangements for contract services work,
which may have longer production cycles than bioresearch reagents and bulk antigens and antibodies,
as well as buying patterns of major customers. We believe that the overall breadth of our product
lines serves to reduce the variability in consolidated revenues.
Revenues for each of our operating segments are shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 vs. |
|
|
2010 vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Inc (Dec) |
|
|
Inc (Dec) |
|
U.S. Diagnostics |
|
$ |
97,133 |
|
|
$ |
92,020 |
|
|
$ |
98,970 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
European Diagnostics |
|
|
24,187 |
|
|
|
24,041 |
|
|
|
25,870 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Life Science |
|
|
38,403 |
|
|
|
26,939 |
|
|
|
23,434 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
159,723 |
|
|
$ |
143,000 |
|
|
$ |
148,274 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Diagnostics |
|
$ |
6,692 |
|
|
$ |
6,268 |
|
|
$ |
5,657 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
European Diagnostics |
|
|
24,187 |
|
|
|
24,041 |
|
|
|
25,870 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Life Science |
|
|
22,283 |
|
|
|
13,082 |
|
|
|
9,911 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
53,162 |
|
|
$ |
43,391 |
|
|
$ |
41,438 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total sales |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 31 -
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 vs. |
|
|
2010 vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Inc (Dec) |
|
|
Inc (Dec) |
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
99,298 |
|
|
$ |
88,696 |
|
|
$ |
92,442 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit Margin |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The stability in our overall gross profit margins from 2009 to 2011 reflects the combined effects
of 1) the margin contribution of Bioline Group products for a full year in fiscal 2011; 2)
continued operating efficiencies in our Cincinnati, Ohio diagnostic test manufacturing facility;
and 3) the year-over-year declines in respiratory product sales. Our respiratory product family
generally has a lower gross profit margin than our focus product families (C. difficile,
foodborne and H. pylori). Sales of respiratory products during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 were approximately
10%, 15% and 20%, respectively, of our consolidated sales. Specifically, sales of the Companys
influenza products during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 represented approximately 2%, 6% and 10%,
respectively, of consolidated sales.
GPO contracts also impacted our gross profit margins during fiscal 2011 and 2010. These contracts
provide customers with favorable pricing based on purchase volumes of Meridian products. During
fiscal 2011, we experienced approximately $1,000 in unfavorable price variance, as a result of
these agreements. However, these agreements help secure our products with these customers and have
led to new business. While in the near term this has negatively impacted gross profit, further
increases in volumes are expected from these contracts.
Our overall operations consist of the sale of diagnostic test kits for various disease states and
in alternative test formats, as well as bioresearch reagents, bulk antigens and antibodies,
proficiency panels, and contract research and development and contract manufacturing services.
Product sales mix shifts, in the normal course of business, can cause the consolidated gross
profit margin to fluctuate by several points.
- 32 -
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Research & |
|
|
Selling & |
|
|
General & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Development |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
Administrative |
|
|
Other (1) |
|
|
Expenses |
|
2009 Expenses |
|
$ |
8,274 |
|
|
$ |
18,324 |
|
|
$ |
17,065 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
43,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 Increases (Decreases): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Diagnostics |
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479 |
|
European Diagnostics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
Life Science |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Bioline Group |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
- Core |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707 |
|
- Transaction Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Expenses |
|
$ |
8,396 |
|
|
$ |
18,250 |
|
|
$ |
19,672 |
|
|
$ |
1,240 |
|
|
$ |
47,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
% Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2011 Increases (Decreases): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Diagnostics |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
European Diagnostics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
Life Science |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Bioline Group |
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,164 |
|
- Core |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
- Transaction Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Expenses |
|
$ |
9,822 |
|
|
$ |
22,772 |
|
|
$ |
24,883 |
|
|
$ |
1,788 |
|
|
$ |
59,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
% Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
Overall, the increase in total operating expenses during fiscal 2011 results in large part from (i)
the impact on all three ongoing operating expense categories (i.e., Research & Development, Selling
& Marketing, and General & Administrative) of adding the Bioline Groups full-year operating
expenses; (ii) incurring approximately $1,240 of costs during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 in
connection with the reorganization of our sales and marketing leadership (including severance
benefits for the former President and Managing Director of our European diagnostics business); and
(iii) incurring approximately $1,057 of costs during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 in
connection with the consolidation of our Saco, Maine operations into our Memphis, Tennessee
location. The facility consolidation costs incurred to-date are comprised primarily of write-downs
to property, equipment and inventory, and stay bonus costs for personnel scheduled to be terminated
at varying times throughout fiscal 2012. Additional stay bonus costs totaling approximately $600
are expected to be incurred during fiscal 2012, with the majority of such costs to be incurred
during the first and second quarters.
- 33 -
Operating expenses for the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment increased $2,628 for fiscal 2011
compared to fiscal 2010 and increased $479 for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The overall
net increase in fiscal 2011 reflects the combined effects of the following:
Research & Development
Overall increase in spending on new product development activities related to products
submitted to the FDA during the year and planned for submission during fiscal 2012, as well
as spending on increased illumigene® component qualification activities. Costs
include increased personnel-related and quality control costs of approximately $450 and
$150, respectively.
Selling & Marketing
The launch of illumigene® resulting in increased sales bonus and commissions
expenses and increased travel and trade show expenses of approximately $750 and $300,
respectively.
General & Administrative
The positive effects of overall cost containment and reduction efforts being offset by an
approximate $750 increase in stock-based compensation during fiscal 2011.
The overall net increase in the U.S. Diagnostics operating segments expenses during fiscal 2010
compared to fiscal 2009 reflected the combined effects of: (i) decreased research and development
spending as a result of completing the development of our molecular illumigene® C.
difficile product, including the illumipro-10® instrument, which was launched during
fiscal 2010, and comparatively higher clinical trial costs for certain immunoassay products in
2009; (ii) decreased sales and marketing expenses due to lower C. difficile and respiratory product
sales resulting in lower bonus and commission costs for our sales organization; and (iii) increased
general and administrative expenses as a result of higher
compensation costs, including stock-based
compensation costs related to time-vested restricted stock granted in November 2009.
Operating expenses for the European Diagnostics operating segment increased $1,174 for fiscal 2011
compared to fiscal 2010 and increased $72 for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The fiscal 2011
increase was primarily attributable to costs associated with the aforementioned reorganization of
our sales and marketing leadership during the fiscal 2011 second quarter.
Operating expenses for the Life Science operating segment increased $9,145 for fiscal 2011 compared
to fiscal 2010 and increased $2,104 for fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009, excluding one-time
transaction costs of $1,240. The increase in 2011 resulted from the previously-noted addition of
the Bioline Groups full-year operating expenses and the costs related to consolidating the Maine
and Tennessee facilities. The increase in 2010 resulted primarily from increased salaries and
benefits related to filling open positions, increased research and development resource
allocations, and the addition of the Bioline Groups operating expenses of $1,397.
- 34 -
The amount of stock-based compensation expense reported for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $2,614,
$1,866 and $1,092, respectively. During November 2008, we granted to certain employees restricted
stock that was contingent upon Meridian achieving a specified net earnings level for fiscal 2009.
Because Meridians fiscal net earnings did not reach the minimum level in 2009, these awards were
not earned and no stock-based compensation has been recorded for these awards. In November 2009,
we granted restricted shares and restricted share units to certain employees, with half of each
employees grant being time-vested restricted shares or restricted share units vesting in total in
four years, and the remaining half being subject to attainment of a specified earnings target for
fiscal 2010. Dividends were paid on these shares and units throughout fiscal 2010. While the 2010
earnings target was not met, on September 30, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors chose to convert the performance-based restricted shares to time-vested restricted shares
vesting in total after four years in recognition of the achievement in 2010 of several strategic
initiatives that position the Company for future growth. Expense totaling $472 was recorded in
fiscal 2010 as a result of this conversion, and is included in the total amount of stock-based
compensation set forth above. Similarly, in November 2010, we granted restricted shares and
restricted share units to certain employees, with half of each employees grant being time-vested
restricted shares or restricted share units vesting in full in four years, and the remaining half
being subject to attainment of a specified earnings target for fiscal 2011. Although dividends
were paid on these shares and units throughout fiscal 2011, because Meridians net earnings
did not reach the minimum level in fiscal 2011, the performance-based awards were not earned and no
stock-based compensation has been recorded for these performance-based awards.
Operating Income
Operating income decreased 3% and 16% in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, as a result of the
factors discussed above.
Other Income and Expense
Interest income was $115, $124 and $456, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
decreases during the periods reflect (i) lower interest yields in the current interest rate
environment, (ii) the use of cash early in the fiscal 2010 fourth quarter to acquire the Bioline
Group, and (iii) the use of cash in fiscal 2011 to fund facility expansions in Cincinnati and
Memphis, and to build illumigene® inventory. The increase in other income, net, during
fiscal 2011 can primarily be attributed to the addition of the Bioline Group, as it contributed
grant income from a foreign government agency of approximately $200. Receipt of grant income to
this level, if at all, is not expected to continue in fiscal 2012 due to the local countrys rules
regarding ownership by a U.S. parent.
Income Taxes
The effective rate for income taxes was 34%, 36% and 34% for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 was primarily attributable to
the release of certain reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the passage of the relevant
statutes of limitations and the nondeductible nature of Bioline acquisition costs. The effective
rate increase in 2010 resulted primarily from the non-deductible nature of Bioline Group
transaction costs and the expiration of the Federal research and experimentation tax credit
effective December 31, 2009.
- 35 -
Impact of Inflation
To the extent feasible, we have consistently followed the practice of adjusting our prices to
reflect the impact of inflation on salaries and fringe benefits for employees and the cost of
purchased materials and services. Inflation and changing prices did not have a material adverse
impact on our gross margin, revenue or operating income in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
Comparative Cash Flow Analysis
Our cash flow and financing requirements are determined by analyses of operating and capital
spending budgets, consideration of acquisition plans, and consideration of common share dividends.
We have historically maintained a credit facility to augment working capital requirements and to
respond quickly to acquisition opportunities. Our investment portfolio presently contains
overnight repurchase agreements. We used $23,849 from our investment portfolio to complete the
acquisition of the Bioline Group during July 2010.
We have an investment policy that guides the holdings of our investment portfolio. Our objectives
in managing the investment portfolio are to (i) preserve capital, (ii) provide sufficient liquidity
to meet working capital requirements and fund strategic objectives such as acquisitions, and (iii)
capture a market rate of return commensurate with market conditions and our policys investment
eligibility criteria. As we look forward, we will continue to manage the holdings of our
investment portfolio with preservation of capital being the primary objective.
At the present time, we do not expect current conditions in the financial markets, or overall
economic conditions to have a significant impact on our liquidity needs, financial condition, or
results of operations, although no assurances can be made in this regard. We intend to continue to
fund our working capital requirements and dividends from current cash flows from operating
activities and cash on hand. We also have additional sources of liquidity through our $30,000 bank
credit facility, if needed. To date, except for the Italian matter discussed below, we have not
experienced any significant deterioration in the aging of our customer accounts receivable nor in
our vendors ability to supply raw materials and services and extend normal credit terms.
Approximately $4,900 of our accounts receivable at September 30, 2011 is due from Italian hospital
customers whose funding ultimately comes from the Italian government. The magnitude of the
sovereign debt crisis in Europe, and Italy in particular, is significant. We have experienced a
deterioration in the aging of our Italian accounts receivable and continue to monitor the situation
closely. Our liquidity needs may change if overall economic conditions worsen and/or liquidity and
credit within the financial markets remains tight for an extended period of time, and such
conditions impact the collectability of our customer accounts receivable, or impact credit terms
with our vendors, or disrupt the supply of raw materials and services.
- 36 -
Fluctuations in overall stock market valuations may raise questions as to the potential impairment
of goodwill and other long-lived assets. Our annual goodwill impairment review takes place as of
June 30th each year. There have been no impairments from these annual reviews. As of
October 31, 2011, our stock price was $18.22 per share, compared to our book value per share of
$3.36 as of September 30, 2011. This relationship, stock price trading at a 5.4x multiple of book
value, is an indicator that the fluctuation in overall stock market valuations and its impact on
our stock price has not been a triggering event for impairment of our goodwill and other long-lived
assets.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased 24% to $22,456 in fiscal 2011. Given the
relatively consistent level of net earnings, this decrease primarily reflects the effects of net
working capital changes related to our investments in illumigene® inventory, including
instruments, and the timing of payments from customers and payments to suppliers.
Net cash used for investing activities was $9,151 for fiscal 2011 compared to $16,332 for fiscal
2010. This decrease in cash used primarily results from an approximate $6,000 increase in
expenditures for property, plant and equipment during fiscal 2011, including significant facility
expansions in both Cincinnati and Memphis, being more than offset by the comparative effects of
fiscal 2010 including, but not limited to, (i) the acquisition of the Bioline Group ($20,404 net
cash used) and (ii) the sale of our student loan auction-rate securities ($7,275 net cash
received).
Net cash used for financing activities was $27,520 for fiscal 2011 compared to $29,190 for fiscal
2010. This decrease was primarily attributable to a 3% increase in dividend payments being more
than offset by an increase in proceeds and tax benefits from the exercise of stock options.
Net cash flows from operating activities and cash on hand are anticipated to be adequate to fund
working capital requirements, capital expenditures and dividends during the next twelve months.
During the last seven fiscal quarters, the per share amount of our cash dividend has exceeded the
per share amount of our diluted earnings. During fiscal 2012, management expects that this
relationship will change; meaning the per share amount of our diluted earnings will exceed the per
share amount of our current cash dividend, although no assurances can be made in this regard.
- 37 -
Capital Resources
We have a $30,000 credit facility with a commercial bank which expires September 15, 2012. As of
November 29, 2011, there were no borrowings outstanding on this facility and we had 100% borrowing
capacity available to us. We have had no borrowings outstanding under this facility during fiscal
2011 or 2010.
Our capital expenditures are estimated to range between approximately $3,000 to $5,000 for
fiscal 2012, with the actual amount depending upon actual operating results and the phasing of
certain projects. Such expenditures may be funded with cash and equivalents on hand, operating
cash flows, and/or availability under the $30,000 credit facility discussed above.
Known Contractual Obligations:
Known contractual obligations and their related due dates were as follows as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Operating leases (1) |
|
$ |
2,877 |
|
|
$ |
1,119 |
|
|
$ |
1,521 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
8,524 |
|
|
|
7,911 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain income tax
positions liability and
interest (3) |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,943 |
|
|
$ |
9,572 |
|
|
$ |
2,134 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Meridian and its subsidiaries are lessees of (i) office and warehouse buildings in
Cincinnati, Boston, Florida, Australia, Belgium, France, Holland, Germany and the U.K.; (ii)
automobiles for use by the diagnostic direct sales forces in the U.S. and Europe; and (iii)
certain office equipment such as facsimile machines and copier machines across all business
units, under operating lease agreements that expire at various dates. |
|
(2) |
|
Meridians purchase obligations are primarily outstanding purchase orders for inventory and
service items. These contractual commitments are not in excess of expected production
requirements over the next twelve months. |
|
(3) |
|
As of September 30, 2011, our liabilities for uncertain tax positions and related interest
and penalties were $422 and $120, respectively. Due to inherent uncertainties in the timing of
settlement of tax positions, we are unable to estimate the timing of the effective settlement of
these obligations. |
Other Commitments and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements:
License Agreements
Meridian has entered into various license agreements that require payment of royalties based on a
specified percentage of sales of related products (1% to 14%). Meridian expects that payments
under these agreements will amount to approximately $4,500 in fiscal 2012. These royalty payments
primarily relate to the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment.
Meridian entered into a license agreement in October 2006 with a third party that provides rights
to a molecular technology for infectious disease testing in the United States, Europe and other
geographic markets. The agreement, as amended, calls for remaining payments of up to approximately
$3,500, based on the achievement of certain product development milestones and on-going royalties
once products are available for commercial sale.
- 38 -
Off-balance sheet arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Market Risk Exposure:
Foreign Currency Risk
We have market risk exposure related to foreign currency transactions. We are exposed to foreign
currency risk related to our European distribution operations where the billing currency is the
Euro for most of our customers in these markets. We also are exposed to foreign currency risk
related to the supply of certain diagnostic test kits by manufacturers located in Germany and
Spain. These foreign currency risks are opposite one another, providing a natural hedge with
respect to consolidated gross profit and operating income. Additionally, as a result of the July
2010 Bioline Group acquisition, we are exposed to foreign currency risks related to the Bioline
Groups operations in Australia (Australian dollar), Germany (Euro), and the U.K. (British pound).
Assessing foreign currency exposures is a component of our overall ongoing risk management process,
with such currency risks managed as we believe appropriate.
Concentration of Customers/Products Risk
Our U.S. Diagnostic operating segments sales through two national distributors were 49% of the
U.S. Diagnostics operating segments total sales or 30% of consolidated sales for fiscal 2011. Our
C. difficile, foodborne and H. pylori product families accounted for 58% of our U.S. Diagnostics
operating segments third-party sales during fiscal 2011. These same products accounted for 58% of
our European Diagnostics operating segments third-party sales and 44% of our consolidated sales
for fiscal 2011.
Our Life Science operating segments sales of purified antigens and reagents to two customers were
15% of the Life Science operating segments total sales for fiscal 2011 or 4% of our consolidated
sales for fiscal 2011. Our Life Science operating segment has four other significant customers who
purchase antigens, antibodies and reagents, which together comprise 10% of the operating segments
total sales for fiscal 2011.
Critical Accounting Policies:
The consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Such
accounting principles require management to make judgments about estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures.
Management believes that the following accounting policies are critical to understanding the
accompanying consolidated financial statements because the application of such polices requires the
use of significant estimates and assumptions and the carrying values of related assets and
liabilities are material.
- 39 -
Revenue Recognition
Our revenues are derived primarily from product sales. Revenue is generally recognized from sales
when product is shipped and title has passed to the buyer. Revenue for the U.S. Diagnostics
operating segment is reduced at the date of sale for estimated rebates that will be claimed by
customers. Rebate agreements are in place with certain independent national distributors and are
designed to reimburse such distributors for their cost in handling our products. Management
estimates accruals for rebate agreements based on data provided by these customers, estimates of
inventories of our products held by these customers, historical statistics, current trends and
other factors. Changes to the accruals are recorded in the period that they become known.
Revenue for our Diagnostics operating segments includes bundled product revenue for our
illumigene® molecular test system. The bundled product includes an instrument,
instrument accessories and test kits. If not sold outright, amounts invoiced for the
illumigene® test kits cover the instrument, accessories and test kits. Revenue is
recognized based on kit sales. If not sold outright, costs for the instruments are recognized in
cost of sales over the period that we have a pricing agreement in effect with the customer, generally
three years.
Life Science revenue for contract services may come from research and development services or
manufacturing services, including process development work, or a combination of both. Revenue is
recognized based on each of the deliverables in a given arrangement having distinct and separate
customer pricing. Pricing is often subject to a competitive bidding process. Contract research
and development services may be performed on a time and materials basis or fixed fee basis.
For time and materials arrangements, revenue is recognized as services are performed and billed.
For fixed fee arrangements, revenue is recognized upon completion and acceptance by the customer.
For contract manufacturing services, revenue is generally recognized upon delivery of product and
acceptance by the customer. In some cases, customers may request that we store on their behalf,
clinical grade biologicals that we produce under contract manufacturing agreements. These cases
arise when customers do not have clinical grade storage facilities or do not want to risk
contamination during transport. For such cases, revenue may be recognized on a bill-and-hold
basis. No such bill-and-hold arrangements existed at September 30, 2011 or September 30, 2010.
Inventories
Our inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a first-in,
first-out (FIFO) basis for substantially all of our inventories. We establish reserves against
cost for excess and obsolete materials, finished goods whose shelf life may expire before sale to
customers, and other identified exposures. Management estimates these reserves based on
assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual demand and market conditions were
to be less favorable than such estimates, additional inventory write-downs would be required and
recorded in the period known. Such adjustments would negatively affect gross profit margin and
overall results of operations.
- 40 -
Intangible Assets
Our intangible assets include identifiable intangibles and goodwill. Identifiable intangibles
include customer lists, supply agreements, manufacturing technologies, patents, licenses and trade
names. All of Meridians identifiable intangibles have finite lives.
Goodwill is subject to an annual impairment review (or more frequently if impairment indicators
arise) by applying a fair-value based test. There have been no impairments from these analyses.
Identifiable intangibles with finite lives are subject to impairment testing. Identifiable
intangibles with finite lives are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate
that such assets may not be recoverable at their current carrying value. Whether an event or
circumstance triggers impairment is determined by comparing an estimate of the assets undiscounted
future cash flows to its carrying value. If impairment has occurred, it is measured by a
fair-value based test. There were no events or circumstances in fiscal 2011, 2010 or 2009
indicating that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable.
Our ability to recover intangible assets, both identifiable intangibles and goodwill, is dependent
upon the future cash flows of the related acquired businesses and assets. Management is required
to make judgments and assumptions regarding future cash flows, including sales levels, gross profit
margins, operating expense levels, working capital levels, and capital expenditures. With respect
to identifiable intangibles, management also makes judgments and assumptions regarding useful
lives.
Management considers the following factors in evaluating events and circumstances for possible
impairment: (i) significant under-performance relative to historical or projected operating
results, (ii) negative industry trends, (iii) sales levels of specific groups of products (related
to specific identifiable intangibles), (iv) changes in overall business strategies, and (v) other
factors.
If actual cash flows are less favorable than projections, this could trigger impairment of
intangible assets and other long-lived assets. If impairment were to occur, this would negatively
affect overall results of operations.
Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes includes federal, foreign, state and local income taxes currently
payable and those deferred because of temporary differences between income for financial reporting
purposes and income for tax purposes. We prepare estimates of permanent and temporary differences
between income for financial reporting purposes and income for tax purposes. These differences are
adjusted to actual upon filing of our tax returns, typically occurring in the third and fourth
quarters of the current fiscal year for the preceding fiscal years estimates.
- 41 -
Our deferred tax assets include net operating loss carryforwards in foreign jurisdictions. The
realization of tax benefits related to net operating loss carryforwards is dependent upon the
generation of future taxable income in the applicable jurisdictions. Management assesses the level
of deferred tax asset valuation allowance by taking into consideration historical and future
projected operating results, future reversals of taxable temporary differences, as well as tax
planning strategies. The amount of net deferred tax assets considered realizable could be reduced
in future years if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
Undistributed earnings in our non-U.S. subsidiaries are considered by management to be permanently
re-invested in such subsidiaries. Consequently, U.S. deferred tax liabilities on such earnings
have not been recorded. We believe that such U.S. taxes would be largely offset by foreign tax
credits for taxes paid locally.
From time to time, our tax returns in federal, state and foreign jurisdictions are examined by the
applicable tax authorities. To the extent that adjustments result from the completion of these
examinations or the lapsing of statutes of limitation, they will affect tax liabilities in the
period known. We believe that the results of any tax authority examinations would not have a
significant adverse impact on financial condition or results of
operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In May 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. FASB ASU No.
2011-04 amends and clarifies the measurement and disclosure requirements of FASB ASC 820, resulting
in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value
measurements, clarification of how to apply existing fair value measurement and disclosure
requirements, and changes to certain principles and requirements for measuring fair value and
disclosing information about fair value measurements. The new requirements are effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company plans to adopt this amended guidance
on October 1, 2012 and at this time does not anticipate that it will have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In June 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends the
disclosure and presentation requirements of Comprehensive Income. Specifically, FASB ASU No.
2011-05 requires that all nonowner changes in shareholders equity be presented either in 1) a
single continuous statement of comprehensive income or 2) two separate but consecutive statements,
in which the first statement presents total net income and its components, and the second statement
presents total other comprehensive income and its components. These new presentation requirements,
as currently set forth, are effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2012, with early
adoption permitted. The Company will proceed with evaluating the presentation alternatives
provided within FASB ASU No. 2011-05, as well as the permitted dates of adoption, and determine the
most appropriate changes to be made to the current presentation of comprehensive income within its
Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity and when to make such changes.
- 42 -
In September 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which amended
goodwill impairment guidance to provide an option for entities to first assess qualitative factors
to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is
more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.
After assessing the totality of events and circumstances, if an entity determines that it is not
more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount,
performance of the two-step impairment test is no longer required. This guidance is effective for
annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have any
impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations, cash flow or financial position.
Additionally, see Note 1 (n) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See Market Risk Exposure and Capital Resources under Item 7 above.
- 43 -
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
All other supplemental schedules are omitted due to the absence of conditions under which they are
required or because the information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes
thereto.
- 44 -
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).
The Companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material
effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting can only provide
reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and
criteria in Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on managements evaluation and those criteria, the Company concluded that
its system of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2011.
The companys independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John A. Kraeutler
John A. Kraeutler
|
|
/s/ Melissa A. Lueke
Melissa A. Lueke
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
November 29, 2011
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2011 |
|
|
- 45 -
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Meridian Bioscience, Inc. (an Ohio corporation)
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2011. Our audits of the basic financial statements included the financial statement
schedule listed in the index appearing under Schedule No. II. We also have audited Meridian
Bioscience, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Meridian Bioscience, Inc.s management is
responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule and an opinion on Meridian Bioscience, Inc.s
internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
- 46 -
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Meridian Bioscience, Inc. as of September 30, 2011 and 2010,
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended September 30, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in
all material respects, the information set forth therein.
In our opinion, Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries, maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by COSO.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
November 29, 2011
- 47 -
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
159,723 |
|
|
$ |
143,000 |
|
|
$ |
148,274 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
59,916 |
|
|
|
54,304 |
|
|
|
55,832 |
|
Cost of Sales Plant consolidation |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
99,298 |
|
|
|
88,696 |
|
|
|
92,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
9,822 |
|
|
|
8,396 |
|
|
|
8,274 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
22,772 |
|
|
|
18,250 |
|
|
|
18,324 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
24,883 |
|
|
|
19,672 |
|
|
|
17,065 |
|
Sales and marketing leadership reorganization |
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant consolidation costs |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bioline Group transaction costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
59,265 |
|
|
|
47,558 |
|
|
|
43,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
40,033 |
|
|
|
41,138 |
|
|
|
48,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
40,500 |
|
|
|
41,400 |
|
|
|
49,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Provision |
|
|
13,669 |
|
|
|
14,753 |
|
|
|
16,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
26,831 |
|
|
$ |
26,647 |
|
|
$ |
32,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares used for basic earnings per common share |
|
|
40,715 |
|
|
|
40,515 |
|
|
|
40,390 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted
shares and units |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares used for diluted earnings per common
share |
|
|
41,358 |
|
|
|
41,149 |
|
|
|
41,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options and restricted shares and units |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 48 -
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
26,831 |
|
|
$ |
26,647 |
|
|
$ |
32,759 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
|
3,104 |
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,321 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
Amortization of deferred illumigene contract costs |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,218 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
Loss on disposition and write-down of fixed assets |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Change in current assets, net of acquisition |
|
|
(10,762 |
) |
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
(5,353 |
) |
Change in current liabilities, net of acquisition |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(5,775 |
) |
|
|
269 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
22,456 |
|
|
|
29,733 |
|
|
|
32,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition earnout payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(9,139 |
) |
|
|
(3,083 |
) |
|
|
(3,643 |
) |
Proceeds
from dispositions of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Proceeds from sales and calls of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,275 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Acquisition of Bioline Group, net of cash received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of intangibles and other assets |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(9,151 |
) |
|
|
(16,332 |
) |
|
|
(3,280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(30,943 |
) |
|
|
(29,985 |
) |
|
|
(26,260 |
) |
Proceeds and tax benefits from exercises of stock options |
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(27,520 |
) |
|
|
(29,190 |
) |
|
|
(24,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Equivalents |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents |
|
|
(14,253 |
) |
|
|
(16,151 |
) |
|
|
4,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
37,879 |
|
|
|
54,030 |
|
|
|
49,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
23,626 |
|
|
$ |
37,879 |
|
|
$ |
54,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
17,991 |
|
|
$ |
16,036 |
|
|
$ |
17,472 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 49 -
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
23,626 |
|
|
$ |
37,879 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $310 in
2011 and $241 in 2010 |
|
|
24,844 |
|
|
|
22,064 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
32,689 |
|
|
|
28,420 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
6,343 |
|
|
|
5,071 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,852 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
90,354 |
|
|
|
95,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, at Cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
991 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
23,033 |
|
|
|
20,670 |
|
Machinery, equipment and furniture |
|
|
32,408 |
|
|
|
31,945 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
60,512 |
|
|
|
54,926 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,973 |
|
|
|
33,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
26,539 |
|
|
|
21,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
23,124 |
|
|
|
23,302 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
10,947 |
|
|
|
13,327 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Deferred illumigene contract costs, net |
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
38,600 |
|
|
|
38,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
155,493 |
|
|
$ |
154,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 50 -
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
5,548 |
|
|
$ |
4,466 |
|
Accrued employee compensation costs |
|
|
4,235 |
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
4,692 |
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
15,264 |
|
|
|
14,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, no par value, 71,000,000 shares authorized, 41,237,120
and 40,654,286 issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
100,010 |
|
|
|
94,529 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
38,065 |
|
|
|
42,177 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
138,524 |
|
|
|
137,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
155,493 |
|
|
$ |
154,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 51 -
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comp. |
|
|
Comp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
40,314 |
|
|
$ |
89,107 |
|
|
$ |
39,016 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
128,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid $0.65 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,260 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
Cost of S-8 registration statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,759 |
|
|
|
32,759 |
|
Hedging activity, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Transfer of investments to trading status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
Other comprehensive income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
40,493 |
|
|
|
91,668 |
|
|
|
45,515 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid $0.74 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,985 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995 |
|
Issuance of restricted shares, net of
forfeitures |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,647 |
|
|
|
26,647 |
|
Other comprehensive income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
40,654 |
|
|
|
94,529 |
|
|
|
42,177 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid $0.76 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,943 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
Issuance of restricted shares, net of
forfeitures |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of restricted shares |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of restricted stock units |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,504 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,831 |
|
|
|
26,831 |
|
Other comprehensive income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
41,237 |
|
|
$ |
100,010 |
|
|
$ |
38,065 |
|
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
138,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
- 52 -
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) |
|
Nature of Business Meridian is a fully-integrated life science company whose principal
businesses are (i) the development, manufacture and distribution of diagnostic test kits
primarily for certain gastrointestinal, viral, respiratory and parasitic infectious diseases,
(ii) the manufacture and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents,
nucleotides, competent cells and bioresearch reagents used by researchers and other diagnostic
manufacturers and (iii) the contract development and manufacture of proteins and other
biologicals for use by biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in research for
new drugs and vaccines. |
(b) |
|
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated. Unless the context requires otherwise, references to Meridian, we,
us, our or our company refer to Meridian Bioscience, Inc. and its subsidiaries. |
(c) |
|
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates are discussed in Notes 1 (f), 1 (g), 1 (h), 1 (i), 1 (k), 1 (l), 7 and 8
(b). |
(d) |
|
Foreign Currency Translation - Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated
using year-end exchange rates with gains or losses resulting from translation included as a
separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Revenues and expenses
are translated using exchange rates prevailing during the year. We also recognize foreign
currency transaction gains and losses on certain assets and liabilities that are denominated
in the Australian dollar, British pound and Euro currencies. These gains and losses are
included in other income and expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. |
- 53 -
(e) |
|
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments The primary objectives of our investment activities
are to preserve capital and provide sufficient liquidity to meet operating requirements and
fund strategic initiatives such as acquisitions. We maintain a written investment policy that
governs the management of our investments in fixed income securities. This policy, among
other things, provides that we may purchase only high credit-quality securities, that have
short-term ratings of at least A-1 and P-1 or better, and long-term ratings of at least A-2
and A or better, by Moodys and Standard & Poors, respectively, at the time of purchase. We
consider short-term investments with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash
equivalents, including overnight repurchase agreements and institutional money market funds.
At times our investments of cash and equivalents with various high credit quality financial
institutions may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance (FDIC) insurance limit. |
|
|
Our investment portfolio includes the following components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Cash and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Other |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
11,784 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,862 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Money market funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on hand - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Unrestricted |
|
|
11,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
23,626 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
37,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a
first-in, first-out basis (FIFO) for substantially all of our inventories.
illumigene® instruments are carried in inventory until customer placement, at which
time they are transferred to deferred illumigene contract costs, unless sold outright. |
|
|
We establish reserves against cost for excess and obsolete materials, finished goods whose shelf
life may expire before sale to customers, and other identified exposures. Such reserves were
$1,635 and $1,130 at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We estimate these reserves
based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual demand and market
conditions were to be less favorable than such estimates, additional inventory write-downs would
be required and recorded in the period known. Such adjustments would negatively affect gross
profit margin and overall results of operations. |
(g) |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Upon
retirement or other disposition of property, plant and equipment, the cost and related
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is
reflected in earnings. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is
computed on the straight-line method in amounts sufficient to write-off the cost over the
estimated useful lives as follows: |
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements 18 to 40 years |
|
|
|
|
Machinery, equipment and furniture 3 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment and software 3 to 5 years |
- 54 -
|
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we announced the closure of our Saco, Maine facility,
and began the consolidation of manufacturing operations from this facility with our Memphis,
Tennessee facility. In connection with this consolidation, the carrying value of certain
property, plant and equipment, including the building, was determined to be impaired and a
write-down of approximately $425 has been recorded as of September 30, 2011. The building and
the property on which it sits have been written down to current value, less selling costs, as
determined by an independent outside appraisal. |
(h) |
|
Intangible Assets Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are subject to
an annual impairment review (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) by applying a
fair-value based test. Fair value is determined via a market approach from three
perspectives. These three perspectives are (i) an allocation of our actual enterprise value
(defined as market capitalization plus debt less cash and cash equivalents) to each of the
reporting units based on revenue and EBITDA contributions to consolidated results; (ii) an
allocation of implied enterprise values to each of our reporting units based on average and
median EBITDA multiples from a comparable group of companies; and (iii) a review of enterprise
value to EBITDA multiples from recent industry merger and acquisition transactions. We
perform our annual impairment review as of June 30, the end of our third fiscal quarter. We
have no intangible assets with indefinite lives other than goodwill. There have been no
impairments from these analyses for fiscal 2011, 2010 or 2009. |
|
|
The change in goodwill was a decrease of $178 and an increase of $13,436 in fiscal 2011 and
fiscal 2010, respectively. These changes related entirely to the Life Science operating
segments Bioline Group fiscal 2010s increase from the Bioline Group acquisition in July 2010
and fiscal 2011s decrease from the currency translation adjustments thereon. See Note 2. |
|
|
A summary of Meridians acquired intangible assets subject to amortization, as of September 30,
2011 and 2010 is as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accum. |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accum. |
|
As of September 30, |
|
Value |
|
|
Amort. |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amort. |
|
Manufacturing technologies, core
products and cell lines |
|
$ |
11,626 |
|
|
$ |
8,545 |
|
|
$ |
11,644 |
|
|
$ |
7,693 |
|
Trademarks, licenses and patents |
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
3,547 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
Customer lists and supply
agreements |
|
|
12,222 |
|
|
|
6,557 |
|
|
|
12,537 |
|
|
|
5,816 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,386 |
|
|
$ |
16,439 |
|
|
$ |
27,854 |
|
|
$ |
14,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 55 -
|
|
The actual aggregate amortization expense for these intangible assets for fiscal 2011, 2010 and
2009 was $2,321, $1,581 and $1,579, respectively. The estimated aggregate amortization expense
for these intangible assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows: fiscal
2012 $2,080, fiscal 2013 $2,080, fiscal 2014 $1,642, fiscal 2015 $1,393 and fiscal 2016
$1,050. |
|
|
Long-lived assets, excluding goodwill and identifiable intangibles with indefinite lives, are
reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that such assets may not be
recoverable at their carrying value. Whether an event or circumstance triggers an impairment is
determined by comparing an estimate of the assets future undiscounted cash flows to its
carrying value. If impairment has occurred, it is measured by a fair-value based test. |
|
|
Our ability to recover our intangible assets, both identifiable intangibles and goodwill, is
dependent upon the future cash flows of the related acquired businesses and assets. We make
judgments and assumptions regarding future cash flows, including sales levels, gross profit
margins, operating expense levels, working capital levels, and capital expenditures. With
respect to identifiable intangibles and fixed assets, we also make judgments and assumptions
regarding useful lives. See Note 1 (g) regarding impairment write-downs related to the
consolidation of our Maine operations. |
|
|
We consider the following factors in evaluating events and circumstances for possible
impairment: (i) significant under-performance relative to historical or projected operating
results; (ii) negative industry trends; (iii) sales levels of specific groups of products
(related to specific identifiable intangibles); (iv) changes in overall business strategies; and
(v) other factors. |
|
|
If actual cash flows are less favorable than projections, this could trigger impairment of
intangible assets and other long-lived assets. If impairment were to occur, this would
negatively affect overall results of operations. |
(i) |
|
Revenue Recognition Revenue is generally recognized from sales when product is shipped and
title has passed to the buyer. Revenue for the U.S. Diagnostics operating segment is reduced
at the date of sale for estimated rebates that will be claimed by customers. Management
estimates accruals for rebate agreements based on data provided by these customers, estimates
of inventories of our products held by these customers, historical statistics, current trends,
and other factors. Changes to the accruals are recorded in the period that they become known.
Our rebate accruals were $4,176 at September 30, 2011 and $5,273 at September 30, 2010, and
have been netted against accounts receivable. |
- 56 -
|
|
Revenue for our Diagnostics operating segments includes bundled product revenue for our
illumigene® molecular test system. The bundled product includes an instrument,
instrument accessories and test kits. If not sold outright, amounts invoiced for the
illumigene® test kits cover the instrument, accessories and test kits. Revenue is
recognized based on kit sales. If not sold outright, costs for the instruments are recognized in
cost of sales over the period that we have a pricing agreement in effect with the customer, generally
three years. |
|
|
Life Science revenue for contract services may come from research and development services or
manufacturing services, including process development work, or a combination of both. Revenue
is recognized based on each of the deliverables in a given arrangement having distinct and
separate customer pricing. Pricing is often subject to a competitive bidding process. Contract
research and development services may be performed on a time and materials basis or fixed
fee basis. For time and materials arrangements, revenue is recognized as services are
performed and billed. For fixed fee arrangements, revenue is recognized upon completion and
acceptance by the customer. For contract manufacturing services, revenue is generally
recognized upon delivery of product and acceptance by the customer. In some cases, customers
may request that we store on their behalf, clinical grade biologicals that we produce under
contract manufacturing agreements. These cases arise when customers do not have clinical grade
storage facilities or do not want to risk contamination during transport. For such cases,
revenue may be recognized on a bill-and-hold basis. No such bill-and-hold arrangements existed
at September 30, 2011 or September 30, 2010. |
|
|
Trade accounts receivable are recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at
invoiced amounts less provisions for rebates and doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful
accounts represents our estimate of probable credit losses and is based on historical write-off
experience. The allowance for doubtful accounts and related metrics, such as days sales
outstanding, are reviewed monthly. Accounts with past due balances over 90 days are reviewed
individually for collectibility. Customer invoices are charged off against the allowance when
we believe it is probable that the invoices will not be paid. |
(j) |
|
Research and Development Costs Research and development costs are charged to expense as
incurred. Research and development costs include, among other things, salaries and wages for
research scientists, materials and supplies used in the development of new products, costs for
development of instrumentation equipment, costs for clinical trials, and costs for facilities
and equipment. |
(k) |
|
Income Taxes The provision for income taxes includes federal, foreign, state and local
income taxes currently payable and those deferred because of temporary differences between
income for financial reporting and income for tax purposes. We prepare estimates of permanent
and temporary differences between income for financial reporting purposes and income for tax
purposes. These differences are adjusted to actual upon filing of our tax returns, typically
occurring in the third and fourth quarters of the current fiscal year for the preceding fiscal
years estimates. |
- 57 -
|
|
We account for uncertain tax positions using a benefit recognition model with a two-step
approach: (i) a more-likely-than-not recognition criterion; and (ii) a measurement attribute
that measures the position as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely
of being ultimately realized upon ultimate settlement. If it is not more likely than not that
the benefit will be sustained on its technical merits, no benefit is recorded. We recognize
accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as a portion of our income tax provision
in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 7. |
(l) |
|
Stock-based Compensation We recognize compensation expense for all share-based awards made
to employees, based upon the fair value of the share-based award on the date of the grant.
See Note 8(b). |
(m) |
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive income (loss) represents the net change in
shareholders equity during a period from sources other than transactions with shareholders.
Our comprehensive income or loss is comprised of net earnings, foreign currency translation,
and the related income tax effects. Components of beginning and ending accumulated other
comprehensive income or loss, and related activity, are shown in the following table: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,007 |
|
|
$ |
(352 |
) |
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
(238 |
) |
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n) |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements
in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. FASB ASU No. 2011-04 amends and clarifies the measurement and
disclosure requirements of FASB ASC 820, resulting in common requirements for measuring fair
value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, clarification of how to
apply existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements, and changes to certain
principles and requirements for measuring fair value and disclosing information about fair
value measurements. The new requirements are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2011. The Company plans to adopt this amended guidance on October 1, 2012 and at
this time does not anticipate that it will have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. |
- 58 -
|
|
In June 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends
the disclosure and presentation requirements of Comprehensive Income. Specifically, FASB ASU
No. 2011-05 requires that all nonowner changes in shareholders equity be presented either in 1)
a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or 2) two separate but consecutive
statements, in which the first statement presents total net income and its components, and the
second statement presents total other comprehensive income and its components. These new
presentation requirements, as currently set forth, are effective for the Company beginning
October 1, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company will proceed with evaluating the
presentation alternatives provided within FASB ASU No. 2011-05, as well as the permitted dates
of adoption, and determine the most appropriate changes to be made to the current presentation
of comprehensive income within its Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity and when to make
such changes. |
|
|
In September 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which amended
goodwill impairment guidance to provide an option for entities to first assess qualitative
factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination
that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its
carrying amount. After assessing the totality of events and circumstances, if an entity
determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less
than its carrying amount, performance of the two-step impairment test is no longer required.
This guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of this
guidance is not expected to have any impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations,
cash flow or financial position. |
(o) |
|
Shipping and Handling costs Shipping and handling costs invoiced to customers are included
in net sales. Costs to distribute products to customers, including freight costs, warehousing
costs, and other shipping and handling activities are included in cost of goods sold. |
(p) |
|
Non-income Government-Assessed Taxes We classify all non-income, government-assessed taxes
(sales, use, and value-added) collected from customers and remitted by us to appropriate
revenue authorities, on a net basis (excluded from net sales) in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. |
(q) |
|
Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior fiscal year
financial statements to conform to the current fiscal year presentation. Such
reclassifications had no impact on net earnings or shareholders equity. |
(2) Acquisition of Bioline Group
On July 20, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of the Bioline group of companies
(collectively the Bioline Group). We paid $23,849 from cash and equivalents on hand to acquire
the Bioline Group. Headquartered in London, the Bioline Group is a leading manufacturer and
distributor of molecular biology reagents with additional operations in Germany, Australia and the
United States. The highly specialized molecular biology reagents it supplies to the life science
research, biotech, pharmaceutical and commercial diagnostics markets are the critical components
used in PCR testing for DNA, RNA and other genomic testing.
- 59 -
As a result of the consideration paid exceeding the fair value of the net assets being acquired,
goodwill in the amount of $12,992 was recorded in connection with this acquisition, none of which
will be deductible for tax purposes. This goodwill results largely from the addition of key global
operations and direct sales capabilities, management talent and a research-oriented customer base,
to complement our existing Life Science operations. In addition to the Bioline Groups results of
operations since the acquisition date, which are included in our fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010
Consolidated Statement of Operations and reported as part of the Life Science operating segment,
the consolidated results for fiscal 2011 and 2010 also include:
|
i) |
|
$587 and $230 of Cost of Sales for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively,
related to the roll-out of fair value inventory adjustments for sales of products that
were in the Bioline Groups inventory on the date of acquisition and, therefore, were
valued at fair value, rather than manufactured cost, in the opening balance sheet; |
|
ii) |
|
$1,003 and $166 of General and Administrative Expenses for fiscal 2011 and
fiscal 2010, respectively, related to the amortization of specific identifiable
intangible assets recorded on the opening balance sheet, including customer
relationships, license agreements, non-compete agreements, manufacturing processes and
trade names; and |
|
iii) |
|
$1,240 of transaction costs for fiscal 2010 reflected as Operating Expenses. |
The results of the Bioline Group included in the consolidated results of the Company for fiscal
2011 and fiscal 2010 are as follows, reflecting the items noted above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
14,869 |
|
|
$ |
2,084 |
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
Net Earnings (Loss) |
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
(1,262 |
) |
- 60 -
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition
of the Bioline Group are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 20, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Measurement |
|
|
July 20, |
|
|
|
(as initially |
|
|
Period |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
reported) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
(as adjusted) |
|
Fair value of assets acquired - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
3,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,445 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
371 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
|
350 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
13,166 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
12,992 |
|
Other
intangible assets (estimated useful life): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships (10 years) |
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,898 |
|
Manufacturing processes (6 years) |
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
License agreements (approximate
8 year wtd. avg.) |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
718 |
|
Non-compete agreements (1 year) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
Trade names (10 years) |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,702 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
29,507 |
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration paid |
|
$ |
23,849 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011, the purchase price allocation related to the acquisition of the Bioline
Group has been finalized and is reflected in the above fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. These fair values are based on the information that was available as of the
acquisition date and the filing date of this Form 10-K and are reflected in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets, including retrospective adjustment of the September 30, 2010
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The consolidated pro forma results of the combined entities of Meridian and the Bioline Group, had
the acquisition date been October 1, 2008, are as follows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(UNAUDITED) |
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
159,723 |
|
|
$ |
153,635 |
|
|
$ |
160,525 |
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
27,282 |
|
|
$ |
27,833 |
|
|
$ |
31,700 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
- 61 -
These pro forma amounts have been calculated after adjusting the results of the Bioline Group to
reflect the transaction costs incurred by the Company and the additional amortization that would
have been charged assuming the previously-discussed fair value adjustments to inventory and
identifiable intangible assets had been applied on October 1, 2008, together with the consequential
tax effects. Fiscal 2011 pro forma earnings exclude $694 related to amortization of the fair value
adjustments to inventory and certain of the identifiable intangible assets, and the related tax
effects, as these amounts have been included in the fiscal 2009 pro forma earnings. Fiscal 2010
pro forma earnings (i) exclude $1,470 related to amortization of the fair value adjustments to
inventory and transaction costs incurred by the Company, and the related tax effects, as these
amounts have been included in the fiscal 2009 pro forma earnings and (ii) include an additional
$730 of amortization of identifiable intangible assets, and the related tax effects, that would
have resulted from applying the previously-discussed fair value adjustments as of October 1, 2008.
(3) Inventories
Inventories are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
7,598 |
|
|
$ |
6,221 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
7,427 |
|
|
|
6,784 |
|
Finished goods illumigene instruments |
|
|
4,179 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
Finished goods kits and other |
|
|
15,120 |
|
|
|
16,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Inventory |
|
$ |
34,324 |
|
|
$ |
29,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Inventory |
|
$ |
32,689 |
|
|
$ |
28,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Bank Credit Arrangements
We have a $30,000 credit facility with a commercial bank, which expires in September 2012. This
credit facility is collateralized by our business assets, except for those of non-U.S.
subsidiaries, which totaled approximately $128,000 at September 30, 2011. There were no borrowings
outstanding on this credit facility at September 30, 2011 or September 30, 2010. Available
borrowings under this credit facility were $30,000 at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010.
In connection with this bank credit facility, we are required to comply with financial covenants
that limit the amount of debt obligations and require a minimum amount of tangible net worth. We
are in compliance with all covenants. We are also required to maintain a cash compensating balance
with the bank in the amount of $1,000, pursuant to this bank credit facility and are in compliance
with this requirement.
(5) Hedging Transactions
Prior to February 1, 2009, we managed exchange rate risk related to forecasted intercompany sales
denominated in the Euro currency through the use of forward exchange contracts and designated such
forward contracts as cash flow hedges. As such, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the
derivative instrument was reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified
into revenues in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the same period or periods during
which the hedged transaction affected earnings. As of September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010,
we had no such contracts outstanding.
- 62 -
During January 2009, 500 notional amount of forward exchange contracts were settled in accordance
with their original maturities. The realized gain on these contracts was $32. Also during January
2009, we accelerated the settlement of the remaining 2,700 notional amount of forward exchange
contracts that were originally scheduled to mature between February 27, 2009 and December 31, 2009.
These transactions resulted in a gain of approximately $140 that was recorded in the second
quarter of fiscal 2009. We unwound these forward exchange contracts after completing a strategic
review of our foreign currency exposures. This strategic review revealed that we have natural
currency hedges in place for consolidated gross profit and operating income via certain
Meridian-branded diagnostic test kits that we purchase in Euros from suppliers in Spain and
Germany.
The amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income on the effective portion of our foreign
exchange contracts was $0, $0 and $109 in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The amount of
gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income on the effective portion
of these foreign exchange contracts was $0, $0 and $112, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. No portion of the gain/loss was excluded from other comprehensive income due to
effectiveness testing.
(6) Fair Value Measurements
We use a fair value measurement to value our financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value hierarchy prioritizes
inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are
described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are
accessible at the measurement date for assets and liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the
highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets
or liabilities, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, that is, markets in
which there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, or price
quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers, or in which little
information is released publicly and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs, developed using our estimates and assumptions, which reflect those
that the market participants would use. Such inputs are used when little or no market data is
available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
- 63 -
Determining where an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy depends on the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole. In determining fair value, we
utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs to the extent possible and considers counterparty credit risk in the assessment
of fair value.
We had no financial assets or liabilities carried at fair value at September 30, 2011 to be
classified as Level 1, 2 or 3. As of September 30, 2010, financial assets and liabilities to be so
classified were comprised solely of money market funds totaling $10,249 classified as Level 1, with
no financial assets or liabilities classified as Level 2 or Level 3.
(7) Income Taxes
(a) |
|
Earnings before income taxes, and the related provision for income taxes for the years ended
September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
37,955 |
|
|
$ |
38,329 |
|
|
$ |
46,504 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
2,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings before income taxes |
|
$ |
40,500 |
|
|
$ |
41,400 |
|
|
$ |
49,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (credit) for income taxes - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current provision |
|
$ |
13,336 |
|
|
$ |
13,626 |
|
|
$ |
15,094 |
|
Temporary differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset basis differences and depreciation |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Intangible asset basis differences and amortization |
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
Currently non-deductible expenses and reserves |
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
Stock based compensation |
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
(373 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
11,571 |
|
|
|
12,627 |
|
|
|
14,288 |
|
State and local |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income
tax provision |
|
$ |
13,669 |
|
|
$ |
14,753 |
|
|
$ |
16,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 64 -
(b) |
|
The following is a reconciliation between the statutory U.S. income tax rate and the
effective rate derived by dividing the provision for income taxes by earnings before income
taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Computed income taxes at statutory rate |
|
$ |
14,175 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
14,490 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
17,263 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local income taxes |
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Foreign tax rate differences |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Qualified domestic production
incentives |
|
|
(1,025 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(870 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Bioline Group transaction costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. book-to-return and
uncertain tax position
activity |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,669 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
$ |
14,753 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
$ |
16,564 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
The components of net deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Deferred tax assets - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation reserves and non-deductible expenses |
|
$ |
1,529 |
|
|
$ |
1,128 |
|
Stock compensation expense not deductible |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
Inventory basis differences |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
6,180 |
|
|
|
4,936 |
|
Less valuation allowance |
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
5,741 |
|
|
|
4,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset basis differences and depreciation |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
(721 |
) |
Intangible asset basis differences and amortization |
|
|
(3,421 |
) |
|
|
(4,082 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(4,594 |
) |
|
|
(5,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
1,147 |
|
|
$ |
(885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For income tax purposes, we have tax benefits related to operating loss carryforwards in the
countries of Australia, Belgium and France. These net operating loss carryforwards have no
expiration date. We have recorded deferred tax assets for these carryforwards totaling $767 and
$740 at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively, inclusive of valuation allowances
for the country of Belgium. This valuation allowance is for pre-acquisition net operating loss
carryforwards. If tax benefits are recognized in future years for these pre-acquisition net
operating loss carryforwards, such benefits will be allocated to reduce goodwill and acquired
intangible assets.
- 65 -
The realization of deferred tax assets in foreign jurisdictions is dependent upon the generation of
future taxable income in these countries. We have considered the levels of currently anticipated
pre-tax income in foreign jurisdictions in assessing the required level of the deferred tax asset
valuation allowance. Taking into consideration historical and current operating results, and other
factors, we believe that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset for foreign
jurisdictions, after consideration of the valuation allowance, which has been established, will be
realized. The amount of the net deferred tax asset considered realizable in foreign jurisdictions,
however, could be reduced in future years if estimates of future taxable income during the
carryforward period are reduced.
Undistributed earnings reinvested indefinitely in our non-U.S. operations were approximately
$17,000 at September 30, 2011. U.S. deferred tax liabilities of approximately $6,000 on such
earnings have not been recorded. We believe that such U.S. taxes would be largely offset by
foreign tax credits for taxes paid in non-U.S. jurisdictions.
As described in Note 1, we utilize a comprehensive model for the recognition, measurement,
presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions, assuming full knowledge of all relevant
facts by the applicable tax authorities. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at
September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 related to such positions was $542 and $725,
respectively, of which the full amounts would favorably affect the effective tax rate if
recognized. We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component
of our income tax provision. During fiscal 2011 and 2010, we (decreased)/increased our tax
provision by approximately ($109) and $128, respectively, for such interest and penalties. We had
approximately $120 accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at September 30, 2011 compared
to $229 accrued at September 30, 2010. The amount of our liability for uncertain tax positions
expected to be paid or settled in the next 12 months is uncertain.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Unrecognized income tax benefits beginning of year |
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
572 |
|
Additions for tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax examination settlements |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Expirations of statute of limitations |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized income tax benefits at end of year |
|
$ |
542 |
|
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are subject to examination by the tax authorities in the U.S. (both federal and state) and the
countries of Australia, Belgium, England, France, Germany, Holland and Italy. In the U.S., open
tax years are for fiscal 2010 and forward. The IRS has completed its examination of our federal
returns for fiscal 2008 and 2009. In countries outside the U.S., open tax years generally range
from fiscal 2006 and forward. However, in Belgium, the utilization of local net operating loss
carryforwards extends the statute of limitations for examination well into the foreseeable future.
Tax examinations in France were completed for fiscal years 2004-2006 during fiscal 2007.
- 66 -
(8) Employee Benefits
(a) |
|
Savings and Investment Plan - We have a profit sharing and retirement savings plan covering
substantially all full-time U.S. employees. Profit sharing contributions to the plan, which
are discretionary, are approved by the Board of Directors. The plan permits participants to
contribute to the plan through salary reduction. Under terms of the plan, we match 50% of an
employees contributions, up to maximum match of 3% of eligible compensation. Our
discretionary and matching contributions to the plan amounted to approximately $1,228, $1,282
and $1,188, during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
(b) |
|
Stock-Based Compensation Plans - We have one active stock-based compensation plan, the 2004
Equity Compensation plan, which became effective December 7, 2004, as amended (the 2004
Plan) and an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESP Plan), which became effective October 1,
1997. Effective October 1, 1997, we began selling shares of stock to our full-time and
part-time employees under the ESP Plan up to the number of shares equivalent to a 1% to 15%
payroll deduction from an employees base salary plus an additional 5% dollar match of this
deduction by Meridian. |
|
|
We may grant new shares for options, restricted shares or restricted share units for up to 3,000
shares under the 2004 Plan, of which we have granted 1,501 through September 30, 2011. Options
may be granted at exercise prices not less than 100% of the closing market value of the
underlying common shares on the date of grant and have maximum terms up to ten years. Vesting
schedules are established at the time of grant and may be set based on future service periods,
achievement of performance targets, or a combination thereof. All options contain provisions
restricting their transferability and limiting their exercise in the event of termination of
employment or the disability or death of the optionee. We have granted options for 4,479 shares
under similar plans that have expired. We recognize compensation expense for all share-based
payments made to employees, based upon the fair value of the share-based payment on the date of
the grant. |
- 67 -
|
|
On November 12, 2008, we granted approximately 94 restricted shares to certain employees subject
to attainment of a specified earnings target for fiscal 2009. While the dividends were paid on
these restricted shares throughout fiscal 2009, the fiscal 2009 target was not met and these
restricted shares were cancelled. On November 12, 2009, we granted approximately 105 restricted
shares and restricted share units (with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $22.18 per share) to
certain employees, with half of each employees grant being time-vested restricted shares or
restricted share units vesting in total on November 12, 2013, and the remaining half being
subject to attainment of a specified earnings target for fiscal 2010. Dividends were paid on
these shares and units throughout fiscal 2010. While the 2010 earnings target was not met, on
September 30, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors chose to convert the
performance-based restricted shares to time-vested restricted shares vesting in total on
November 12, 2013. This conversion impacted approximately fifty employees and resulted in
expense totaling $472, which was recorded in fiscal 2010 and is included in the total amount of
stock-based compensation set forth below. Similarly, during fiscal 2011, we granted
approximately 214 restricted shares and restricted share units (with a weighted-average grant
date fair value of $22.93 per share) to certain employees, with half of each employees grant being
time-vested restricted shares or restricted share units vesting in total on the fourth
anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining half being subject to attainment of a specified
earnings target for fiscal 2011. While dividends were paid on these shares and units throughout
fiscal 2011, the target for fiscal 2011 was not met and the performance-based portion of the
restricted shares and restricted share units granted during fiscal 2011 have been cancelled.
Giving effect to this cancellation and certain other activities throughout the year, including
conversions to common shares, forfeitures, and new hire and promotee grants, approximately 196
restricted shares and restricted share units remain outstanding as of September 30, 2011, with a
weighted-average grant date fair value of $22.63 per share, a
weighted-average remaining vesting period of
2.32 years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $3,077. The weighted-average grant date
fair value of the approximate 18 restricted share units that vested during fiscal 2011 was
$22.83 per share. |
|
|
The amount of stock-based compensation expense reported was $2,614, $1,866 and $1,092 in fiscal
2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The fiscal 2011 expense is comprised of $495 related to
stock options, $2,009 related to restricted shares and units, and $110 related to the granting
of unrestricted commons shares to a retiring director, while the fiscal 2010 expense is
comprised of $908 related to stock options and $958 related to restricted shares and units. The
total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for these stock-based compensation
arrangements was $865, $665 and $367, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of
September 30, 2011, we expect future stock compensation expense for unvested options and
unvested restricted stock and units to total $387 and $1,996, respectively, which will be
recognized during fiscal years 2012 through 2015. |
|
|
We recognize compensation expense only for the portion of shares that we expect to vest. As
such, we apply estimated forfeiture rates to our compensation expense calculations. These rates
have been derived using historical forfeiture data, stratified by several employee groups.
During fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded $39, $17 and $42, respectively, in stock
compensation expense to adjust estimated forfeiture rates to actual. |
- 68 -
|
|
We have elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine grant-date fair value
for stock options, with the following assumptions: (i) expected share price volatility based on
average of Meridians historical volatility over the options expected lives and implied
volatility based on the value of tradable call options; (ii) expected life of options based on
contractual lives, employees historical exercise behavior and employees historical
post-vesting employment termination behavior; (iii) risk-free interest rates based on treasury
rates that correspond to the expected lives of the options; and (iv) dividend yield based on the
expected yield on underlying Meridian common stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Risk-free interest rates |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
2.93 |
% |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
2.41 |
% |
Life of option |
|
5.93 |
yrs. |
|
5.90 |
yrs. |
|
6.30-8.20 |
yrs. |
Share price volatility |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
Forfeitures (by
employee group) |
|
|
0%-10 |
% |
|
|
0%-10 |
% |
|
|
0%-13 |
% |
|
|
A summary of the status of our stock option plans at September 30, 2011 and changes during the
year is presented in the table and narrative below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wtd Avg |
|
|
Wtd Avg |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (Yrs) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding beginning of period |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
$ |
11.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
22.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercises |
|
|
(485 |
) |
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
23.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellations |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
22.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of period |
|
|
988 |
|
|
$ |
15.86 |
|
|
|
5.0515 |
|
|
$ |
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable end of period |
|
|
859 |
|
|
$ |
14.60 |
|
|
|
4.5635 |
|
|
$ |
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the status of our nonvested options as of September 30, 2011, and changes during
the year ended September 30, 2011, is presented below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested beginning of period |
|
|
639 |
|
|
$ |
3.75 |
|
Granted |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
2.82 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
7.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested end of period |
|
|
129 |
|
|
$ |
7.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted was $4.97, $6.70 and $11.05 for
fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was
$8,038, $813 and $2,560, for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total grant-date
fair value of options that vested during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $1,594, $1,558 and
$2,019, respectively. |
- 69 -
|
|
Cash received from options exercised was $1,721, $592 and $1,243 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Tax benefits realized and recorded to additional paid-in capital from option
exercises totaled $1,256, $403 and $233 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
(9) Major Customers and Segment Data
Our reportable operating segments are U.S. Diagnostics, European Diagnostics and Life Science.
Initial segmentation between Diagnostics and Life Science has been determined based upon products
and customers, with further segmentation of Diagnostics between U.S. and European being based upon
geographic regions served and management responsibility. The U.S. Diagnostics operating segment
consists of manufacturing operations in Cincinnati, Ohio, and the sale and distribution of
diagnostic test kits in the U.S. and countries outside of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The
European Diagnostics operating segment consists of the sale and distribution of diagnostic test
kits in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The Life Science operating segment consists of
manufacturing operations in Memphis, Tennessee; Saco, Maine; Boca Raton, Florida; London, England;
Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia, and the sale and distribution of bulk antigens,
antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells and bioresearch reagents domestically
and abroad. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, plans were announced to consolidate the
Saco, Maine operations into the Memphis, Tennessee facility, with such consolidation commencing
early in the fiscal 2012 first quarter and expected to be completed near the end of the second
quarter of fiscal 2012. The Life Science operating segment also includes the contract development
and manufacture of cGMP clinical grade proteins and other biologicals for use by biopharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines.
Sales to individual customers constituting 10% or more of consolidated net sales are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Customer A |
|
$ |
29,632 |
|
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
$ |
33,821 |
|
|
|
(24 |
)% |
|
$ |
37,876 |
|
|
|
(26 |
)% |
Customer B |
|
$ |
18,308 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
$ |
18,204 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
$ |
19,063 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Combined international sales for the U.S. Diagnostics and Life Science operating segments were
$28,975, $19,350, and $15,568 in fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our focus product
families C. difficile, foodborne and H. pylori accounted for 44%, 43% and 42% of consolidated
net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Approximately 25% of the consolidated
accounts receivable balance at September 30, 2011 is largely dependent upon funds from the Italian
government. We currently sole-source from a U.S. manufacturer the illumipro-10®
instrument on which our illumigene® molecular testing platform operates. Additionally,
two of our foodborne products sourced from another vendor accounted for 14%, 11% and 7% of
third-party sales for our U.S. Diagnostics operating segment in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
- 70 -
Significant sales information by country for the European Diagnostics and Life Science operating
segments is as follows. Sales are attributed to the geographic area based on the location to which
the product is shipped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Italy |
|
$ |
8,544 |
|
|
$ |
8,183 |
|
|
$ |
8,289 |
|
France |
|
|
2,537 |
|
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
2,373 |
|
Holland |
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
Belgium |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
Other countries |
|
|
7,302 |
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
8,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total European Diagnostics |
|
$ |
24,187 |
|
|
$ |
24,041 |
|
|
$ |
25,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
15,711 |
|
|
$ |
13,907 |
|
|
$ |
13,387 |
|
Germany |
|
|
4,922 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
2,816 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
4,890 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
Australia |
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
France |
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
Other countries |
|
|
8,664 |
|
|
|
4,474 |
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life Science |
|
$ |
38,403 |
|
|
$ |
26,939 |
|
|
$ |
23,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets for our Italian distribution organization were $17,192, $17,378 and $16,797 at
September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At September 30, 2011, identifiable assets for
the Bioline Groups operations in the U.K., Germany and Australia totaled approximately $12,825,
$5,550 and $2,675, respectively; and totaled $16,990, $4,441 and $3,094, respectively, at September
30, 2010.
- 71 -
Segment information for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
European |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diagnostics |
|
|
Diagnostics |
|
|
Life Science |
|
|
Elim (1) |
|
|
Total |
|
Fiscal Year 2011 - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party |
|
$ |
97,133 |
|
|
$ |
24,187 |
|
|
$ |
38,403 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
159,723 |
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
10,322 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
(11,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating income (2) |
|
|
35,191 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
40,033 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,854 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
2,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,873 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
4,964 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,139 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,124 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,947 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
73,850 |
|
|
|
19,390 |
|
|
|
92,467 |
|
|
|
(30,214 |
) |
|
|
155,493 |
|
Fiscal Year 2010 - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party |
|
$ |
92,020 |
|
|
$ |
24,041 |
|
|
$ |
26,939 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
143,000 |
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
10,285 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
(10,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating income (3) |
|
|
33,432 |
|
|
|
3,367 |
|
|
|
3,615 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
41,138 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,722 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,685 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,302 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,327 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
72,030 |
|
|
|
18,044 |
|
|
|
90,388 |
|
|
|
(25,821 |
) |
|
|
154,641 |
|
Fiscal Year 2009 - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party |
|
$ |
98,970 |
|
|
$ |
25,870 |
|
|
$ |
23,434 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
148,274 |
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
10,700 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
(11,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
39,490 |
|
|
|
4,459 |
|
|
|
4,728 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
48,779 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,360 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,643 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,866 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,317 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
102,506 |
|
|
|
18,221 |
|
|
|
55,592 |
|
|
|
(20,322 |
) |
|
|
155,997 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Eliminations consist of intersegment transactions. |
|
(2) |
|
U.S. Diagnostics and European Diagnostics include $365 and $875, respectively, related to
sales and marketing leadership reorganization costs; and Life Science includes $1,057 related to consolidation
of the Maine operations into the Tennessee facility. |
|
(3) |
|
Life Science includes $1,240 of Bioline transaction costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Segment operating income |
|
$ |
40,033 |
|
|
$ |
41,138 |
|
|
$ |
48,779 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated earnings before income
taxes |
|
$ |
40,500 |
|
|
$ |
41,400 |
|
|
$ |
49,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 72 -
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies in Note 1. Transactions between operating segments are accounted
for at established intercompany prices for internal and management purposes with all intercompany
amounts eliminated in consolidation.
(10) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) |
|
Royalty Commitments We have entered into various license agreements that require payment of
royalties based on a specified percentage of the sales of licensed products (1% to 14%).
These royalty expenses are recognized on an as-earned basis and recorded in the year earned as
a component of cost of sales. Annual royalty expenses associated with these agreements were
approximately $1,853, $734 and $572, respectively, for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2011, 2010 and 2009. |
|
|
Meridian entered into a license agreement in October 2006 with a third party that provides
rights to a molecular technology for infectious disease testing in the United States, Europe and
other geographic markets. The agreement, as amended, calls for remaining payments of up to
approximately $3,500, based on the achievement of certain product development milestones and
on-going royalties once products are available for commercial sale. |
(b) |
|
Purchase Commitments Excluding the operating lease commitments reflected in Note 10 (c)
below, we have purchase commitments primarily for inventory and service items as part of the
normal course of business. Commitments made under these obligations are $7,911, $103 and
$510 for fiscal 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. No purchase commitments have been made
beyond fiscal 2014. |
(c) |
|
Operating Lease Commitments Meridian and its subsidiaries are lessees of (i) certain office
and warehouse buildings in the U.S., Europe and Australia; (ii) automobiles for use by the
direct sales forces in the U.S. and Europe; and (iii) certain office equipment such as
facsimile and copier machines across all business units, under operating lease agreements that
expire at various dates. Amounts charged to expense under operating leases were $1,391, $759
and $775 for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Operating lease commitments for each
of the five succeeding fiscal years are as follows: fiscal 2012 $1,119, fiscal 2013 $779,
fiscal 2014 $412, fiscal 2015 $330, and fiscal 2016 $237. |
(d) |
|
Litigation We are a party to various litigation matters from time to time that we believe
are in the normal course of business. The ultimate resolution of these matters is not
expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. |
- 73 -
(e) |
|
Indemnifications In conjunction with certain contracts and agreements, we provide routine
indemnifications whose terms range in duration and in some circumstances are not explicitly
defined. The maximum obligation under some such indemnifications is not explicitly stated
and, as a result, cannot be reasonably estimated. We have not made any payments for these
indemnifications and no liability is recorded at September 30, 2011 or September 30, 2010. We
believe that if we were to incur a loss on any of these matters, the loss would not have a
material effect on our financial condition. |
(11) Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The sum of the earnings per common share and cash dividends per share may not equal the
corresponding annual amounts due to interim quarter rounding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended in Fiscal 2011 |
|
December 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
37,263 |
|
|
$ |
41,059 |
|
|
$ |
40,052 |
|
|
$ |
41,349 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
23,502 |
|
|
|
25,957 |
|
|
|
25,351 |
|
|
|
24,488 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
6,025 |
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
6,710 |
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
Diluted earnings per common
share |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended in Fiscal 2010 |
|
December 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
42,457 |
|
|
$ |
31,147 |
|
|
$ |
33,857 |
|
|
$ |
35,539 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
25,404 |
|
|
|
20,222 |
|
|
|
21,803 |
|
|
|
21,267 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
8,921 |
|
|
|
5,980 |
|
|
|
6,424 |
|
|
|
5,322 |
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
- 74 -
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of September 30, 2011, an evaluation was completed under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant
to Rule 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Based on that evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2011. There have been no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of internal
control that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting, or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal control subsequent to September 30, 2011.
Our internal control report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K after Item 8, under the
caption Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
- 75 -
PART III
The information required by Items 10., 11., 12., 13. and 14., of Part III are incorporated by
reference from the Registrants Proxy Statement for its 2012 Annual Shareholders Meeting to be
filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) and (2) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES.
All financial statements and schedules required to be filed by Item 8 of this Form and included in
this report have been so identified under Item 8. No additional financial statements or schedules
are being filed since the requirements of paragraph (c) under Item 15 are not applicable to
Meridian.
(b) (3) EXHIBITS.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Incorporation, including amendments not related
to Company name change (Incorporated by reference to
Registration Statement No. 333-02613 on Form S-3 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 1996
and Meridians Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 16, 2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended Code of Regulations (Incorporated by reference to
Meridians Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 23, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
* |
|
Savings and Investment Plan Prototype Adoption Agreement
(Incorporated by reference to Meridians Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2003) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
* |
|
Salary Continuation Agreement between Meridian Bioscience,
Inc. and John A. Kraeutler, as amended April 24, 2001,
December 29, 2008 and August 3, 2011 (Incorporated by
reference to Meridians Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Incorporated by reference to
Meridians Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year
Ended September 30, 1999) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
* |
|
Employment Agreement Dated February 15, 2001, as amended
December 29, 2008 between Meridian and John A. Kraeutler
(Incorporated by reference to Meridians Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
* |
|
Agreement Concerning Disability and Death dated September 10,
2003, between Meridian and William J. Motto (Incorporated by
reference to Meridians Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2003) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
* |
|
2004 Equity Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated through
January 22, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Meridians Proxy
Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 19, 2007 and Form 8-K filed January 28, 2008) |
- 76 -
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
* |
|
Fiscal 2006 Officers Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated
through January 19, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Meridians
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 19, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
* |
|
Sample Option Agreement dated November 14, 2007 (Incorporated by
reference to Meridians Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
* |
|
Fiscal 2007 Officers Performance Compensation Plan (Incorporated
by reference to Meridians Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 21, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement among Meridian Bioscience, Inc.,
Meridian Bioscience Corporation, Omega Technologies, Inc. Meridian
Life Science, Inc. and Fifth Third Bank dated August 1, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Meridians Annual Report on Form
10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.1 |
|
|
Amended
and Restated Revolving Note with Fifth Third Bank dated August 1, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Meridians Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.2 |
|
|
First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement among Meridian
Bioscience, Inc., Meridian Bioscience Corporation, Omega
Technologies, Inc., Meridian Life Science, Inc. and Fifth Third
Bank dated September 2, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to
Meridians Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10.3 |
|
|
Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement among Meridian
Bioscience, Inc., Meridian Bioscience Corporation, Omega
Technologies, Inc., Meridian Life Science, Inc. and Fifth Third
Bank dated December 1, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to
Meridians Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period
Ended December 31, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
* |
|
Sample Time-Based Restricted Stock Agreement dated November 12,
2009 (Incorporated by reference to Meridians Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
* |
|
Sample Performance Award Restricted Stock Agreement dated November 12, 2009
(Incorporated by reference to Meridians Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 20, 2010 among Meridian Bioscience, Inc.,
Meridian Bioscience Europe, S.A. and Marco Giuseppe Calzavara and Vittorio Giovanni
Calzavara (Incorporated by reference to Meridians Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on July 23, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
* |
|
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. Change in Control Severance Compensation Policy dated March
18, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Meridians Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2011)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
* |
|
Antonio Interno Retirement-Related Agreements related to retirement as of March 31,
2011 (Incorporated by reference to Meridians Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
2011 Annual Report to Shareholders (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Code of Ethics (Incorporated by reference to Meridians Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2003) |
- 77 -
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (Filed herewith) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Filed herewith) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) (Filed herewith) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) (Filed herewith) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Filed herewith) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management Compensatory Contracts |
|
(1) |
|
Only specific portions of the 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders are incorporated by reference
in this Form 10-K as filed herewith. A supplemental paper copy of the 2011 Annual Report to
Shareholders has been furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission for informational
purposes only. |
|
|
|
Meridian will provide shareholders with any exhibit upon the payment of a specified reasonable fee,
which fee shall be limited to Meridians reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibit. |
- 78 -
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ John A. Kraeutler
|
|
|
|
Date: November 29, 2011 |
|
|
|
John A. Kraeutler
Chief Executive Officer |
|
- 79 -
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by
the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Capacity |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William J. Motto
William J. Motto
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
November 29, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John A. Kraeutler
John A. Kraeutler
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Director
|
|
November 29, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Melissa A. Lueke
Melissa A. Lueke
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, and Secretary
|
|
November 29, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James M. Anderson
James M. Anderson
|
|
Director
|
|
November 29, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gary P. Kreider
Gary P. Kreider
|
|
Director
|
|
November 29, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David C. Phillips
David C. Phillips
|
|
Director
|
|
November 29, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Ready
Robert J. Ready
|
|
Director
|
|
November 29, 2011 |
- 80 -
SCHEDULE II
Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
and Subsidiaries
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
Costs and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of |
|
Description |
|
of Period |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
Other (a) |
|
|
Period |
|
Year Ended September 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
Inventory realizability reserves |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,635 |
|
Valuation
allowances deferred taxes |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
241 |
|
Inventory realizability reserves |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1,130 |
|
Valuation allowances deferred
taxes |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
Inventory realizability reserves |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
Valuation allowances deferred
taxes |
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Balances reflect the effects of currency translation |
- 81 -