MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE INC - Quarter Report: 2018 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2018

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 0-14902

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.

Incorporated under the laws of Ohio

31-0888197

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3471 River Hills Drive

Cincinnati, Ohio 45244

(513) 271-3700

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Table of Contents

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor from civil litigation for forward-looking statements accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements. Except for historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which may be identified by words such as “estimates”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “plans”, “seeks”, “may”, “will”, “expects”, “intends”, “believes”, “should” and similar expressions or the negative versions thereof and which also may be identified by their context. All statements that address operating performance or events or developments that Meridian expects or anticipates will occur in the future, including, but not limited to, statements relating to per share diluted earnings and revenue, are forward-looking statements. Such statements, whether expressed or implied, are based upon current expectations of the Company and speak only as of the date made. Specifically, Meridian’s forward-looking statements are, and will be, based on management’s then-current views and assumptions regarding future events and operating performance. Meridian assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results expressed or implied therein will not be realized. These statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, including, without limitation, the following: Meridian’s operating results, financial condition and continued growth depends, in part, on its ability to introduce into the marketplace enhancements of existing products or new products that incorporate technological advances, meet customer requirements and respond to products developed by Meridian’s competition, its ability to effectively sell such products and its ability to successfully expand and effectively manage increased sales and marketing operations. While Meridian has introduced a number of internally developed products, there can be no assurance that it will be successful in the future in introducing such products on a timely basis or in protecting its intellectual

Table of Contents

property, and unexpected or costly manufacturing costs associated with the ramp up of new products could cause actual results to differ from expectations. Meridian relies on proprietary, patented and licensed technologies. As such, the Company’s ability to protect its intellectual property rights, as well as the potential for intellectual property litigation, would impact its results. Ongoing consolidations of reference laboratories and formation of multi-hospital alliances may cause adverse changes to pricing and distribution. Recessionary pressures on the economy and the markets in which our customers operate, as well as adverse trends in buying patterns from customers, can change expected results. Costs and difficulties in complying with laws and regulations, including those administered by the United States Food and Drug Administration, can result in unanticipated expenses and delays and interruptions to the sale of new and existing products, as can the uncertainty of regulatory approvals and the regulatory process. The international scope of Meridian’s operations, including changes in the relative strength or weakness of the U.S. dollar and general economic conditions in foreign countries, can impact results and make them difficult to predict. One of Meridian’s growth strategies is the acquisition of companies and product lines. There can be no assurance that additional acquisitions will be consummated or that, if consummated, will be successful and the acquired businesses will be successfully integrated into Meridian’s operations. There may be risks that acquisitions may disrupt operations and may pose potential difficulties in employee retention, and there may be additional risks with respect to Meridian’s ability to recognize the benefits of acquisitions, including potential synergies and cost savings or the failure of acquisitions to achieve their plans and objectives. Meridian cannot predict the outcome of goodwill impairment testing and the impact of possible goodwill impairments on Meridian’s earnings and financial results. Meridian cannot predict the possible impact of U.S. health care legislation enacted in 2010 – the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act – and any modification or repeal of any of the provisions thereof initiated by Congress or the presidential administration, and any similar initiatives in other countries on its results of operations. Efforts to reduce the U.S. federal deficit, breaches of Meridian’s information technology systems and natural disasters and other events could have a materially adverse effect on Meridian’s results of operations and revenues. In the past, the Company has identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which has been remediated, but the Company can make no assurances that a material weakness will not be identified in the future, which if identified and not properly corrected, could materially adversely affect our operations and result in material misstatements in our financial statements. In addition to the factors described in this paragraph, as well as those factors identified from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K contains a list and description of uncertainties, risks and other matters that may affect the Company. Readers should carefully review these forward-looking statements and risk factors and not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Page 1

Table of Contents

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Page 2

Table of Contents

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Page 3

Table of Contents

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands)

ASSETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Page 4

Table of Contents

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands)

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Page 5

Table of Contents

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

(dollars and shares in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Page 6

Table of Contents

MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts

(Unaudited)

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of Management, the interim financial statements include all normal adjustments and disclosures necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of March 31, 2018, the results of its operations for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, and its cash flows for the six month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s fiscal 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Financial information as of September 30, 2017 has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year.

A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company’s fiscal 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements –

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes and replaces nearly all currently-existing U.S. GAAP revenue recognition guidance including related disclosure requirements. This guidance, including any clarification guidance thereon, will be effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2018 (fiscal 2019). The Company has prepared an inventory of its existing revenue streams and a preliminary analysis of the revenue recognition criteria applying ASU 2014-09. This analysis is preliminary and our overall assessment is not yet complete. However, based on the analysis completed to date, aside from certain expanded disclosure requirements, the Company does not currently anticipate that its planned adoption of ASU 2014-09 on a modified retrospective basis will have a material impact on its reported revenues.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which amends the accounting guidance related to leases. These changes, which are designed to increase transparency and comparability among organizations for both lessees and lessors, include, among other things, requiring recognition of lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Adoption and implementation of the guidance is not required by the Company until the beginning of fiscal 2020, although early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to begin its assessment of the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements in fiscal 2019.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which amends the accounting for share-based payment transactions. These changes, which are designed for simplification, involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, and as a result recorded $160 to the income tax provision, which under the previous guidance would have been recorded within additional paid-in capital. While the future effect of the guidance is dependent upon numerous factors (e.g., the market price of the Company’s common stock on the equity award grant date, the exercise/lapse dates of equity awards, and the market price of the Company’s common stock on such exercise/lapse dates), the effect is not expected to be material. During the first six months of fiscal 2018, our tax provision included a $170 charge for application of ASU 2016-09.

Page 7

Table of Contents

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to address certain of the recent U.S. federal income tax legislation’s impact on Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”). The guidance specifically provides the option of reclassifying “stranded tax effects” related to the tax legislation from AOCI to retained earnings. Adoption and implementation of the optional guidance is not effective for the Company until the beginning of fiscal 2020, although early adoption is permitted. The Company plans to address adoption of this guidance later in fiscal 2018 in connection with the finalization of other matters related to the recent tax legislation (see Note 6 “Income Taxes”) but does not expect adoption to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Reclassifications –

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net earnings or shareholders’ equity.

Cash and equivalents include the following components:

Inventories are comprised of the following:

Page 8

Table of Contents

A summary of our acquired intangible assets subject to amortization, as of March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017, is as follows:

The actual aggregate amortization expense for these intangible assets was $945 and $936 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $1,883 and $1,904 for the six months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for these intangible assets for each of the fiscal years through fiscal 2023 is as follows: remainder of fiscal 2018 – $1,701, fiscal 2019 – $3,361, fiscal 2020 – $3,193, fiscal 2021 – $2,562, fiscal 2022 – $2,182, and fiscal 2023 – $2,170.

On May 17, 2017, the FDA issued a field safety notice advising customers to discontinue use of Magellan’s lead testing systems with venous blood samples. This field safety notice was followed by product recall notices on May 25^th and June 5^th. Magellan’s lead testing systems are capable of processing both capillary and venous blood samples. Magellan’s LeadCare Plus and LeadCare Ultra systems, which accounted for approximately 10% of Magellan’s annual revenues, are used predominantly with venous blood samples. Magellan’s LeadCare and LeadCare II systems are predominantly used with capillary blood samples.

Subsequent to the issuances of these field safety and product recall notices, the FDA completed an inspection of Magellan’s Quality System, and issued its Form 483, Inspectional Observations, on June 29, 2017, which was expectedly followed by a Warning Letter issued on October 23, 2017. The Warning Letter requires periodic reporting on our remediation progress. To date, we have satisfied our post-Warning Letter reporting requirements with the FDA. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2018, we incurred approximately $300 and $800, respectively, in Quality System remediation costs, primarily related to regulatory consultants and studies required to reinstate our venous blood sample claim.

As a result of these matters, we expect to experience delays in reinstating venous blood sample testing on our LeadCare products, as well as in obtaining 510(k) clearance for new Magellan products. We also expect delays in obtaining export certifications for Magellan products during the remediation period. In light of these factors and their impacts, during our 2017 third fiscal quarter, it was determined that a potential impairment of goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of Magellan had occurred (i.e., a “triggering event”). With the assistance of an independent valuation firm, Magellan’s fair value was calculated via both market (comparable company) and income (discounted cash flows) approaches. Based upon these approaches, it was determined that the carrying value of the Magellan reporting unit did, in fact, exceed its fair value. As a result, an impairment charge of $6,628, on both a pre-tax and after-tax basis, was recorded during the fiscal 2017 third quarter.

Given all of the factors considered, we do not anticipate, at this time, any further goodwill impairment charge from the Magellan acquisition. See Note 10 “Subsequent Events”.

Page 9

Table of Contents

On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted tax reform legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “tax reform act”). In applying the tax reform act, we followed the guidance in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”), regarding the application of ASC Topic 740 – Income Taxes in situations where a company does not have the necessary information available, prepared or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the tax reform act for the reporting period in which the tax reform act was enacted. SAB 118 provides for a measurement period beginning in the reporting period that includes the tax reform act’s enactment date and ending when a company has obtained, prepared and analyzed the information needed in order to complete the accounting requirements but in no circumstances should the measurement period extend beyond one year from the enactment date.

We completed the accounting for the effects of the tax reform act during the quarter ended December 31, 2017, except for the effects related to the one-time deemed repatriation transition tax on unrepatriated foreign earnings (the “repatriation transition tax”). As a result, our financial statements for the six months ended March 31, 2018 reflect these effects of the tax reform act as provisional based on a reasonable estimate of the income tax effects. We have included a provisional non-current income tax payable in the amount of $854 related to the repatriation transition tax. The provisional amount is based on tax attribute information currently available from foreign investments. We continue to gather and analyze information, including historical adjustments to earnings and profits of foreign subsidiaries, in order to complete the accounting for the effects of the estimated repatriation transition tax.

Accounting for the remaining income tax effects of the tax reform act which impact our tax provision has been substantially completed and are included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of March 31, 2018. We recorded a one-time tax benefit of $1,695 in the first quarter resulting from the tax reform act, including an adjustment from the re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities. This re-measurement includes an estimate of the temporary differences expected to be realized during fiscal 2018 at a transitional blended federal rate of 24.5%. The remaining temporary differences were re-measured at the 21% federal rate.

In connection with the acquisition of Magellan Biosciences, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary Magellan Diagnostics, Inc. (collectively, “Magellan”), on March 22, 2016 the Company entered into a $60,000 five-year term loan with a commercial bank. The term loan requires quarterly principal and interest payments, with interest at a variable rate tied to LIBOR, and a balloon principal payment due March 31, 2021. The required principal payments on the term loan for each of the remaining fiscal years are as follows: remainder of fiscal 2018 – $2,250, fiscal 2019 – $5,250, fiscal 2020 – $6,000, and fiscal 2021 – $39,000. In light of the term loan’s interest being determined on a variable rate basis, the fair value of the term loan at March 31, 2018 approximates the current carrying value reflected in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

In order to limit exposure to volatility in the LIBOR interest rate, the Company and the commercial bank also entered into an interest rate swap that effectively converts the variable interest rate on the term loan to a fixed rate of 2.76%. With an initial notional balance of $60,000, the interest rate swap was established with critical terms identical to those of the term loan, including (i) notional reduction amounts and dates; (ii) LIBOR settlement rates; (iii) rate reset dates; and (iv) term/maturity. Due to this, the interest rate swap has been designated as an effective cash flow hedge, with changes in fair value reflected as a separate component of other comprehensive income in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. At March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017, the fair value of the interest rate swap was $1,580 and $815, respectively, and is reflected as a non-current asset in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. This fair value was determined by reference to a third party valuation, and is considered a Level 2 input within the fair value hierarchy of valuation techniques.

Page 10

Table of Contents

In addition, the Company maintains a $30,000 revolving credit facility with a commercial bank, which expires March 31, 2021. There were no borrowings outstanding on this credit facility at March 31, 2018 or September 30, 2017.

The term loan and the revolving credit facility are collateralized by the business assets of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries and require compliance with financial covenants that limit the amount of debt obligations and require a minimum level of coverage of fixed charges, as defined in the borrowing agreement. As of March 31, 2018, the Company is in compliance with all covenants. The Company is also required to maintain a compensating cash balance with the bank in the amount of $1,000, and is in compliance with this requirement.

Meridian was formed in 1976 and functions as a fully-integrated life science company with principal businesses in (i) the development, manufacture, sale and distribution of diagnostic test kits, primarily for certain gastrointestinal, viral, respiratory, and parasitic infectious diseases, and elevated blood lead levels; and (ii) the manufacture and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells, and bioresearch reagents used by researchers and other diagnostic manufacturers.

Our reportable segments are Diagnostics and Life Science. The Diagnostics segment consists of manufacturing operations for infectious disease products in Cincinnati, Ohio; manufacturing operations for products detecting elevated lead levels in blood in Billerica, Massachusetts (near Boston); and the sale and distribution of diagnostics products domestically and abroad. This segment’s products are used by hospitals, reference labs and physician offices to detect infectious diseases and elevated lead levels.

The Life Science segment consists of manufacturing operations in Memphis, Tennessee; Boca Raton, Florida; London, England; Luckenwalde, Germany; and Sydney, Australia; and the sale and distribution of bulk antigens, antibodies, PCR/qPCR reagents, nucleotides, competent cells, and bioresearch reagents domestically and abroad, including sales, business development and distribution facilities in Singapore and Beijing, China to further pursue growing revenue opportunities in Asia. This segment’s products are used by manufacturers and researchers in a variety of applications (e.g., in-vitro medical device manufacturing, microRNA detection, next-gen sequencing, plant genotyping, and mutation detection, among others).

Amounts due from two Diagnostics distributor customers accounted for 25% and 11% of consolidated accounts receivable at March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively. Revenues from these two distributor customers accounted for 27% and 28% of the Diagnostics segment third-party revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and 30% and 27% during the six month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These distributors represented 19% of consolidated revenues for each of the fiscal 2018 and 2017 second quarters and 21% and 19% for the respective year-to-date six month periods, respectively.

Within our Life Science segment, two diagnostic manufacturing customers accounted for 22% and 21% of the segment’s third-party revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and 19% and 20% during the six months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Page 11

Table of Contents

Segment information for the interim periods is as follows:

Transactions between segments are accounted for at established intercompany prices for internal and management purposes, with all intercompany amounts eliminated in consolidation.

On May 17, 2017, Meridian filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division (Cincinnati) naming DiaSorin Inc. (“DiaSorin”) as a defendant. Meridian’s complaint alleges DiaSorin has breached the 2010 Co-Development and License Agreement (the “Agreement”) between it and Meridian relating to the co-development of certain tests and diagnostic products, pursuant to which Meridian disclosed certain trade secrets and proprietary information. The lawsuit underlying Meridian’s complaint alleges that DiaSorin breached the Agreement and used, and is currently using, Meridian’s proprietary information and therefore seeks injunctive relief to protect Meridian’s intellectual property and information with respect to its diagnostics products. Approximately $925 and $1,655 of expense for attorneys’ fees related to this matter is included within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2018, respectively.

Page 12

Table of Contents

On November 15, 2017, Barbara Forman filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio naming Meridian, its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (in their capacities as such) as defendants. An amended complaint was filed on April 16, 2018 and the Company believes the essential elements of the amended complaint are the same. The complaint and the amended complaint are hereafter referred to as the “Complaint”. The Complaint alleges that Meridian made false and misleading representations concerning certain of Magellan’s lead test systems at or around the time of Meridian’s acquisition of Magellan and subsequent thereto. The Complaint seeks compensatory damages, injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees to all members of the proposed class. Because the litigation and related discovery are in preliminary stages, we do not have sufficient information to determine or predict the ultimate outcome or estimate the range of possible losses, if any. Accordingly, no provision for litigation losses has been included within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 31, 2018.

On December 6, 2017, Michael Edelson filed a derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio naming Meridian, its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and certain members of Meridian’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee (in their capacities as such) as defendants. The complaint alleges that Meridian made false and misleading representations concerning certain of Magellan’s lead test systems at or around the time of Meridian’s acquisition of Magellan and subsequent thereto, and the complaint alleges that certain members of the Board of Directors and Audit Committee breached their fiduciary duties in their oversight of the Company’s public disclosures and corporate governance matters. The lawsuit underlying plaintiff’s class action complaint seeks compensatory damages, injunctive relief, equitable relief and attorneys’ fees to all members of the proposed class. Because the litigation and related discovery are in preliminary stages, we do not have sufficient information to determine or predict the ultimate outcome or estimate the range of possible losses, if any. Accordingly, no provision for litigation losses has been included within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the fiscal year-to-date period ended March 31, 2018.

Approximately $500 of expense for attorneys’ fees related to the above two class action matters is included within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for both the three and six months ended March 31, 2018. The Company maintains insurance covering these matters, which has a $500 deductible.

See Note 10 “Subsequent Events”.

As discussed in Note 5 “Intangible Assets” and Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” Magellan lead tests have been the subject of a series of FDA activities including (i) a Field Safety Notice on May 17, 2017; (ii) product recall notices on May 25, 2017 and June 5, 2017; (iii) an inspection and resulting Form 483, Inspection Observations; and (iv) a Warning Letter on October 23, 2017. On April 17, 2018, Magellan received a subpoena from the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding its LeadCare product line. The subpoena outlines documents to be produced, and the Company is cooperating with the DOJ in this matter. The Company maintains rigorous policies and procedures to promote compliance with applicable regulatory agencies and requirements, and is working with the DOJ to promptly respond to the subpoena. However, the Company cannot predict when the investigation will be resolved, the outcome of the investigation, or its potential impact on the Company.

Page 13

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Refer to “Forward-Looking Statements” following the Table of Contents in front of this Form 10-Q. In the discussion that follows, all dollar amounts are in thousands (both tables and text), except per share data.

Following is a discussion and analysis of the financial statements and other statistical data that management believes will enhance the understanding of Meridian’s financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations. Unless otherwise noted, increases or decreases are measured over the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto beginning on page 1.

QUARTERLY HIGHLIGHTS

Highlighted by the following, the effects of which are discussed throughout this MD&A, the second quarter of fiscal 2018 continued the success and positive momentum of the first quarter:

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

Net earnings for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 were $5,288, or $0.12 per diluted share. The fiscal 2018 second quarter results include $4,911 of costs associated with the transition to our new CEO and the realignment of other executive positions, and litigation costs (collectively, “Executive transition and realignment costs, and litigation costs”) (see Note 9 “Litigation Matters” of the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). These items impacted earnings by $3,575, or approximately $0.08 per diluted share on a net basis (see “USE OF NON-GAAP MEASURES” below). Consolidated revenues increased 4% to $56,451 for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to the same period of the prior year (3% on a constant-currency basis). On an operating segment basis, revenues increased 5% (3% in constant-currency) and 2% (1% in constant-currency) for Diagnostics and Life Science, respectively.

Six Months Ended March 31, 2018

For the six month period ended March 31, 2018, net earnings were $11,590, or $0.27 per diluted share. The year-to-date fiscal 2018 results include $6,394 of costs associated with the transition to our new CEO and the realignment of other executive positions, and litigation costs (collectively, “Executive transition and realignment costs, and litigation costs”) (see Note 9 “Litigation Matters” of the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), along with certain one-time tax effects of the recently-enacted U.S. tax reform act. These items impacted earnings by $3,814, or approximately $0.09 per diluted share on a net basis (see “USE OF NON-GAAP MEASURES” below). Consolidated revenues increased 8% to $108,734 for the first six months of fiscal 2018 compared to the same period of the prior year (6% on a constant-currency basis). On an operating segment basis, revenues increased 8% (6% in constant-currency) and 7% (5% in constant-currency) for Diagnostics and Life Science, respectively.

Page 14

Table of Contents

Update on Magellan Lead Testing

Magellan offers multiple lead testing systems that are capable of processing both capillary and venous blood samples. Magellan’s LeadCare Plus and LeadCare Ultra systems, which accounted for approximately 10% of Magellan’s annual revenues in fiscal 2016, are used predominantly with venous blood samples. Typically, the Ultra and Plus systems are used in a reference lab setting. Magellan’s LeadCare II system is predominantly used with capillary blood samples and is typically used in a physician office setting. LeadCare II system revenue represented approximately 90% of revenues in fiscal 2016. The LeadCare II system is the only point-of-care system for testing lead exposure, receiving CLIA-waived status. Other methods for testing blood lead levels include Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy and Mass Spectrometry, which are typically performed in hospital and reference laboratory settings.

On May 17, 2017, the FDA issued a field safety notice advising customers to discontinue use of Magellan’s lead testing systems with venous blood samples. This field safety notice was followed by product recall notices on May 25^th and June 5^th. Subsequent to the issuances of these field safety and product recall notices, the FDA completed an inspection of Magellan’s Quality System, and issued its Form 483, Inspectional Observations, on June 29, 2017, which was expectedly followed by a Warning Letter issued on October 23, 2017. During our 2017 third fiscal quarter, it was determined that a potential impairment of goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of Magellan had occurred (i.e., a “triggering event”). An impairment charge of $6,628, on both a pre-tax and after-tax basis, was recorded during the fiscal 2017 third quarter as set forth in Note 5 “Intangible Assets” of the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Warning Letter requires periodic reporting on our remediation progress. To date, we have satisfied our post-Warning Letter reporting requirements with the FDA. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2018, we incurred approximately $300 and $800, respectively, in remediation costs, primarily related to regulatory consultants and studies required to reinstate our venous blood sample claim. We expect remediation costs in the second half of the year to be in the $200 to $400 range. In the course of remediation, Magellan may encounter additional matters that warrant notifications to the FDA and/or customers regarding the use of its products. At this time, we do not believe that any such notifications would impact the ability to use the LeadCare systems with capillary blood samples.

Revenues for Magellan for the six month period ending March 31, 2018 were $8,344, compared to $8,844 in the same period of the prior fiscal year, reflecting reduced revenues as a result of removing the venous blood claim as noted above. Revenues of LeadCare II, utilizing capillary blood samples, increased 7% during the six month period ending March 31, 2018, compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year, reflecting the continued placement of new LeadCare II systems in physician offices.

As set forth in Note 10 “Subsequent Events” of the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, on April 17, 2018, Magellan received a subpoena from the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding its LeadCare product line. The subpoena outlines documents to be produced, and the Company is cooperating with the DOJ in this matter. The Company maintains rigorous policies and procedures to promote compliance with applicable regulatory agencies and requirements, and is working with the DOJ to promptly respond to the subpoena. However, the Company cannot predict when the investigation will be resolved, the outcome of the investigation, or its potential impact on the Company.

USE OF NON-GAAP MEASURES

We have supplemented our reported GAAP financial information with information on net earnings, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share excluding the effects of executive transition and realignment costs, litigation costs and certain one-time tax effects of the tax reform act, each of which is a non-GAAP measure. We have provided in the tables below reconciliations of net earnings, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share, with and without the effects of these non-routine items, for the second quarters and six month periods ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017.

Page 15

Table of Contents

We believe that this information is useful to those who read our financial statements and evaluate our operating results because:

These non-GAAP measures may be different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. In addition, these non-GAAP measures are not based on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. Non-GAAP measures have limitations, in that they do not reflect all amounts associated with our results as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Therefore, these measures should only be used to evaluate our results in conjunction with corresponding GAAP measures.

Page 16

Table of Contents

REVENUE OVERVIEW

Below are analyses of the Company’s revenue, provided for each of the following:

Revenue Overview – By Reportable Segment & Geographic Region

Our reportable segments are Diagnostics and Life Science, with products sold and distributed in the countries comprising North and Latin America (the “Americas”); Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”); and other countries outside of the Americas and EMEA (rest of the world, or “ROW”). A full description of our segments is set forth in Note 8 “Reportable Segments and Major Customers Information” of the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenues for the Diagnostics segment, in the normal course of business, may be affected from quarter to quarter by buying patterns of major distributors, seasonality and the severity of seasonal diseases and outbreaks, and foreign currency exchange rates. Revenues for the Life Science segment, in the normal course of business, may be affected from quarter to quarter by buying patterns of major customers, and foreign currency exchange rates. We believe that the overall breadth of our product lines serves to reduce the variability in consolidated revenues due to these factors.

Revenue Overview- By Product Platform/Type

The revenues generated by each of our reportable segments result primarily from the sale of the following segment-specific categories of products:

Diagnostics

Life Science

Page 17

Table of Contents

Revenues for each product platform/type, as well as its relative percentage of segment revenues, are shown below.

Following is a discussion of the revenues generated by each of these product platforms/types:

Diagnostics Products

Respiratory

The 2017-2018 flu season was particularly strong, as measured by the rate of laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalizations (published by the CDC). Our respiratory products, which include tests for flu, RSV, Group A Strep, Pertussis, and Mycoplasma pneumonia, among others, were strong performers during the first half of fiscal 2018, up $1,333 (18%) during the second quarter and $3,173 (26%) during the first half of the year.

H. pylori

Reflecting the ongoing conversion of serology testing to our antigen tests and buying patterns of certain customers, our H. pylori products also showed solid revenue growth for the first half of fiscal 2018, up $273 (4%) during the second quarter and $1,977 (13%) during the first half of the fiscal year. We continue to believe there are ongoing benefits to be realized from our partnerships with managed care companies in promoting (i) the health and economic benefits of a test and treat strategy; (ii) changes in policies that discourage the use of traditional serology methods and promote the utilization of active infection testing methods; and (iii) physician behavior movement away from serology-based testing and toward direct antigen testing. A significant amount of the H. pylori product revenues are sales to reference labs, whose buying patterns may not be consistent from period to period. We have introduced capabilities to identify resistance to Clarithromycin, the antibiotic commonly used to treat H. pylori. This is currently available in an Analyte Specific Reagent (ASR) format. We believe that partnering the ability to diagnose H. pylori and identify resistance provides a competitive advantage.

Page 18

Table of Contents

The patents for our H. pylori products, owned by us, expired in May 2016 in the U.S. and in May 2017 in countries outside the U.S. We expect competition with respect to our H. pylori products, which represent approximately 15% of our total revenues, to increase in the near future, and such competition may have an adverse impact on our selling prices for these products, or our ability to retain business at prices acceptable to us, and consequently, adversely affect our future results of operations and liquidity, including revenues and gross profit. In order to mitigate competition, our product development pipeline includes multiple new product initiatives for the detection of H. pylori. We are unable to provide assurances that we will be successful with any mitigation strategy or that any mitigation strategy will prevent an adverse effect on our future results of operations and liquidity, including revenues and gross profit. See Note 9 “Litigation Matters” of the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements regarding related litigation.

Other Product Families

Revenues for our other diagnostic products also performed well in the aggregate during the first half of fiscal 2018, increasing $713 (3%) during the second quarter and $1,024 (2%) during the first half of the year.

Life Science Products

During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, revenues from our Life Science segment increased 2%, with revenues from molecular reagent sales increasing 17% and revenues from immunological reagent sales decreasing 5%. For the first six months of fiscal 2018, revenues from our Life Science segment increased 7%, with revenues from molecular reagent sales increasing 14% and revenues from immunological reagent sales increasing 3%. Our molecular reagent products’ revenue growth was impacted by the movement in currency exchange rates since the fiscal 2017 periods, with revenues increasing 12% and 8% on a constant-currency basis over the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2017, respectively. Comparisons of our immunological reagents products’ revenue to the prior year quarter was impacted by the fact that the 2017 second quarter revenue for such products was extraordinarily high due to a high level of contract manufacturing activity and the timing of orders from certain large customers. Overall, our Life Science segment continued to benefit from increased sales into China, with such sales totaling approximately $2,100 during second quarter of fiscal 2018 and approximately $3,600 during the year-to-date period – representing increases of approximately 60% and 80% over the comparable periods of fiscal 2017.

Significant Customers

Revenue concentrations related to certain customers within our Diagnostics and Life Science segments are set forth in Note 8 “Reportable Segments and Major Customers Information” of the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Gross Profit

The gross profit margin decreases experienced in fiscal 2018 primarily result from the combined effects of mix of products sold and operating segment mix.

Page 19

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses – Segment Detail