MESA AIR GROUP INC - Quarter Report: 2008 December (Form 10-Q)

The Company has a cash management program that provides for the investment of excess cash balances primarily in short-term money market instruments, US treasury securities, intermediate-term debt instruments, and common equity securities of companies operating in the airline industry.

SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," requires that all applicable investments be classified as trading securities, available for sale securities or held-to-maturity securities. As of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, the Company had $0.3 million and $0.2 million in marketable securities that include US Treasury notes, government bonds and corporate bonds. These investments are classified as trading securities during the periods presented and accordingly, are carried at market value with changes in value reflected in the current period operations. Unrealized losses relating to trading securities held at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 were $41,000 and $12,000, respectively. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, the Company didn't record any net realized gains on marketable securities.

At December 31, 2008, the Company had $13.6 million in restricted cash. The Company has an agreement with a financial institution for a $15.0 million letter of credit facility and to issue letters of credit for landing fees, workers compensation insurance and other business needs. Pursuant to the agreement, $11.6 million of outstanding letters of credit are required to be collateralized by amounts on deposit. Approximately $2.0 million relates to maintenance deposits and reserves associated with aircraft leased to Kunpeng Airlines.

go! is significantly impacted by changes in jet fuel prices. Jet fuel consumed for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 represented approximately 28.8 % and 26.0% of go!'s operating expenses, respectively. Over the past several years, fuel expense has become an increasingly larger portion of go!'s operating expenses due to the dramatic increases in all energy prices over this period. The Company's goal is to acquire jet fuel at the lowest possible costs. Approximately 5.2% of our total fuel costs are not reimbursed by our code-share partners.

12

As a result, on October 24, 2008, the Company paid a deposit and entered into a fixed price swap agreement for the purchase of jet fuel not reimbursed by code-share partners. We do not account for our fixed price swap agreement as a hedge instrument as defined by SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". Therefore, any changes in the fair value of the swap agreement since the last period are recorded to "Other income (expense)" in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations of the period. All cash flows associated with the purchasing of fuel are classified as operating cash flows in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we recognized a loss of $180,860, related to the change in the fair value of our fixed price swap agreement in our "Other income (expense)" in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had $319,140 remaining on deposit to cover the jet fuel swap.

'Gain (loss) from equity method investments:

The Company accounts for its investment in the Kunpeng Airlines ("Kunpeng") joint venture with Shenzhen Airlines ("Shenzhen") using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the Company adjusts the carrying amount of its investment for its share of the earnings or losses. The Company's beneficial ownership percentage is 44%, after taking into consideration the 5% interest held for the exclusive benefit of an unaffiliated third party. In general, the Company would record 44% of the income or loss of Kunpeng, except that the parties have agreed to share losses according to their respective percentage ownership, with Mesa's exposure capped at a percentage of the gross revenues of Kunpeng that is materially below its percentage ownership interest. During the third quarter of 2008, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent ("LOI") to sell its interest in Kunpeng to Shenzhen. As a result of the negotiated valuation ofthe interest by the parties set forth in the LOI, the Company recorded a loss on its investment in the third quarter of 2008 and no additional losses have been recorded in 2009.

The Company also subleases five regional jets to Kunpeng. Total sublease revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, was $1.3 million. At December 31, 2008, the Company had gross receivables from Kunpeng of approximately $4.5 million.

In fiscal 2007, we participated with a private equity fund in making an investment, through a limited liability limited partnership, in the preferred shares of a closely held emerging markets payment processing related business. In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, due to the improbability of recovering our investment, the company wrote-off the remaining balance of the investment.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, approximately $4.0 million was added to the investment in the airline company related to the conversion of interest to principal. All interest on a 17% note with the airline company that has been accrued, but not paid on each annual payment date of December 31, at the option of the investee, shall be added to the principal amount of the note and shall no longer be deemed to be accrued and unpaid.

13

9. Concentrations

The Company has code-share agreements with Delta, US Airways and United. Approximately 95.9% of the Company's consolidated passenger revenue for the three month period ended December 31, 2008 was derived from these agreements. Accounts receivable from the Company's code-share partners were 32.2% and 34.3% of total gross accounts receivable at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively.

Amounts billed by the Company under revenue guarantee arrangements are subject to our interpretation of the applicable code-share agreement, and are subject to audit by our code-share partners. Periodically our code-share partners dispute amounts billed and pay amounts less than the amount billed. Ultimate collection of the remaining amounts not only depends upon Mesa prevailing under audit, but also upon the financial well-being of the code-share partner. As such, the Company periodically reviews amounts past due and records a reserve for amounts estimated to be uncollectible. The Company's allowance for doubtful accounts was $10.7 million and $10.3 million at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively.

US Airways accounted for approximately 47.6% of the Company's total passenger revenue in the three month period ended December 31, 2008. A termination of the US Airways revenue-guarantee code-share agreements would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

United accounted for approximately 30.7% of the Company's total passenger revenue in the three month period ended December 31, 2008. In most cases under our code share arrangements, the Company is contractually responsible for procuring the fuel necessary to conduct its operations, and fuel costs are then passed through to code-share partners via weekly invoicing. The United code-share agreement contains an option that allows United to assume the contractual responsibility for procuring and providing the fuel necessary to operate the flights that Mesa operates for United. United exercised this option at 15 of the stations we operate, and as a result we no longer incur fuel expense or recognize related fuel pass-through revenue for these United stations. A termination of the United agreement would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Delta accounted for approximately 17.6% of the Company's total passenger revenue in the three month period ended December 31, 2008. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we returned all CRJ 900 aircraft that had been operated under the CRJ-900 Delta code share agreement. A termination of the ERJ-145 Delta Connection agreement would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For further information see Note 3.

14

10. Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

(1) On May 20, 2008, the Company's board of directors approved separate agreements reached by the Company with certain of the holders of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2023 (the "2023 Notes"). As previously disclosed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, holders of the 2023 Notes had the right to require the Company to repurchase the 2023 Notes on June 16, 2008 (the "Put") at a price of $397.27 per $1,000 note (the "Put Price") plus any accrued and unpaid cash interest. If all of the holders of the Notes had exercised this right, the Company would have been required to repurchase the Notes for approximately $37.8 million in cash, common stock, or a combination thereof.

During the three months ended December 31, 2008, the Company paid $1.4 million to purchase approximately 9.5% of their outstanding Senior Convertible Notes due in 2023 and 2024 in the amount of $2.0 million and $7.6 million, respectively. The transaction after the payment of accrued interest, commissions and the write off of deferred debt issuance costs, resulted in a gain of $8.1 million which has been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in Gain on extinguishment of debt.

During the first two weeks of February 2009, the Company (i) issued 3,434,000 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock"), in satisfaction of its obligation to repurchase $1.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2023 ("2023 Notes") from holders of 2023 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2023 Notes and forbearance agreements between the Company and these holders, and (ii) completed transactions with certain holders of its 2023 Notes to purchase an additional $29,071,250 face amount of 2023 Notes in exchange for a total of $1,844,431 in cash, 8,430,457 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock") and $983,937 in aggregate principal amount of the Company's new 8% senior unsecured notes due 2012 (the "2012 Notes").

15

Also during February 2009, the Company repurchased $19,278,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2024 ("2024 Notes") from holders of 2024 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2024 Notes, including $6,504,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes pursuant to certain puts the Company agreed to accept on or about February 19, 2009. In consideration for the $19,278,000 of the 2024 Notes' face value, the Company issued 94,269,420 shares of its Common Stock.    In addition, the Company announced its intent to immediately resume discussions with certain holders of 2024 Notes to enter into agreements with such holders imminently on terms substantially equivalent to previously announced agreements that were rescinded.   As described in the immediately following paragraph, certain of these holders have subsequently agreed to enter into agreements with the Company on terms substantially equivalent to the previously announced rescinded exchange agreements.      

On or about February 17, 2009, the Company entered into separate agreements with certain holders of its 2024 Notes to (i) exchange $83.7 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes for an aggregate of $4.9 million in cash, 10.9 million shares of the Company's Common Stock, and $16.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2012 Notes. The issuance of the Common Stock and 2012 Notes in the exchange is expected to close on or about February 25, 2009.  

Prior to the transactions described above and without giving effect to the February 19th exchange agreements, $52.1 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2023 Notes and $120.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes were outstanding. $21.7 million of the 2023 Notes' face value was not put to the Company and, as of the date of this report, has not otherwise been repurchased and thus remain outstanding. The outstanding 2023 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than June 16, 2013. Following the closing of the transactions evidenced by the February 19th exchange agreements described in the preceding paragraph, the put was not recognized for $17.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes and will remain outstanding. Such outstanding 2024 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than February 10, 2014.    At such time, we may pay the purchase price in cash or shares of our common stock or in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. 

All of the issuances of Common Stock  and  2012 Notes  noted above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) and Section 4(2) thereof.

(2) On November 26, 2008, Mesa Airlines financed certain rotable spare parts in the amount of $2.9 million at an annual interest rate of 3.2% for 60 months. The first principal payment of $82,057 is due and payable on the 21^st month. Interest will be accrued and added to the principal of the note for the first 20 months of the arrangement.

The Company accounts for earnings (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share." Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if outstanding stock options and warrants were exercised. In addition, dilutive convertible securities are included in the denominator while interest on convertible debt, net of tax, is added back to the numerator. A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in computing net income (loss) per share is as follows:

* Excluded from the calculation of dilutive earnings per share because the effect would have been antidilutive.

16

Options to purchase 1,927,022 and 3,418,396 shares of common stock were outstanding during the quarters ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, but were excluded from the calculation of dilutive earnings per share for the quarters ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, because the effect would have been antidilutive.

The Company's Board of Directors has authorized the Company to purchase up to 29.4 million shares of the Company's outstanding common stock. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has acquired and retired approximately 17.9 million shares of its outstanding common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $113.7 million, leaving approximately 11.5 million shares available for purchase under the current Board authorizations. Purchases are made at management's discretion based on market conditions and the Company's financial resources.

The Company didn't repurchase any shares during the three months ended December 31, 2008.

Stock based compensation expense is calculated by estimating the fair value of stock options and restricted stock at the time of grant and amortizing the fair value over the vesting period.

The following amounts were recognized for stock-based compensation:

On January 9, 2007, Aloha Airlines filed suit against Mesa Air Group in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. The complaint seeks damages and injunctive relief. Aloha alleges that Mesa's inter-island air fares are below cost and that Mesa is, therefore, violating specific provisions of the Sherman Act. Aloha also alleges breach of contract and fraud by Mesa in connection with two confidentiality agreements, one entered into in 2005 and the other in 2006. Mesa denies any attempt at monopolization of the inter-island market and further denies any improper use of the data furnished by Aloha while Mesa was considering a bid for Aloha during its bankruptcy proceedings. On November 28, 2008, we entered into a settlement and release agreement ("Settlement Agreement"), effective as of November 28, 2008, with certain affiliates of The Yucaipa Companies LLC (collectively, "Yucaipa") relating to the action entitled Aloha Airlines, Inc., et al. v. Mesa Air Group, Inc. before the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii (Case No. CV 07-00007 DAE/BMK) (the "Action"). The Settlement Agreement fully and finally settles all issues and disputes that were raised, or could have been raised by the partner.

In connection with the Settlement Agreement, Mesa has agreed to issue approximately 2.7 million shares of its common stock to Yucaipa and make a cash payment of $2 million to Yucaipa, which both occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2008. The Company recorded a charge of approximately $2.8 million in the consolidated statements of operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.

17

In connection with a June 2007 agreement modifying certain Canadair Regional Jet purchase obligations, the Company committed to purchase 10 new CRJ-700 NextGen aircraft. In conjunction with this purchase agreement, Mesa has $500,000 on deposit in accordance with the Bombardier Regional Aircraft Agreement ("BRAD") that was included in lease and equipment deposits at December 31, 2008. The deposit is expected to be returned upon completion of permanent financing on each of the ten aircraft.

The Company adopted FIN 48 in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Under FIN No. 48, the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities. The determination is based on the technical merits of the position and presumes that each uncertain tax position will be examined by the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. As a result of implementing FIN 48 in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the only effect on the Company was to reclassify a $2.7 million tax reserve from long-term deferred income tax liability to other noncurrent liabilities at December 31, 2007 under FIN 48. No other changes resulting from implementing FIN 48 were necessary. The Company does not expect a significant change with its uncertain tax positions through the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

The Company also has long-term contracts for the performance of engine maintenance on some of its aircraft. A description of each of these contracts is as follows:

In April 2000, the Company entered into a 10-year engine maintenance contract with Rolls-Royce Allison ("Rolls-Royce") for its ERJ aircraft. The contract requires Mesa to pay Rolls-Royce for the engine overhaul upon completion of the maintenance based upon a fixed dollar amount per flight hour. The rate per flight hour is based upon certain operational assumptions and may vary if the engines are operated differently than these assumptions. The rate is also subject to escalation based on changes in certain price indices. The agreement with Rolls-Royce also contains a termination clause and look back provision to provide for any shortfall between the cost of maintenance incurred by the provider and the amount paid up to the termination date by the Company and includes a 15% penalty on such amount. The Company does not anticipate an early termination under the contract.

On March 28, 2008, Delta notified the Company of its intent to terminate the Delta Connection Agreement among Delta, the Company and the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Freedom Airlines, Inc. alleging failure to maintain a specified completion rate with respect to its ERJ-145 Delta Connection flights during three months of the six-month period ended February, 2008. Following Delta's termination notification, the Company filed a Complaint on April 7, 2008 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. An evidentiary hearing was conducted on May 27 through May 29, 2008. Following the hearing, the Court ruled in the Company's favor and issued a preliminary injunction against Delta.

The effect of this ruling is to prohibit Delta from terminating the Delta Connection Agreement covering the ERJ-145 aircraft operated by Freedom, based on Freedom's completion rate prior to April 2008, pending a final trial at a date to be determined by the Court. On June 27, 2008, Delta filed a Notice of Appeal and on July 15, 2008, Delta filed a motion requesting that the appeal be heard on an expedited basis. The Company responded to Delta's motion in accordance with the applicable rules and the Court of Appeals, after reviewing the filings, denied Delta's request. Delta and the Company have fully briefed the issue on appeal and oral argument in the 11^th Circuit Court of Appeals were held on January 30, 2009.

On August 6, 2008 Mesa filed a complaint against Delta Air Lines seeking the return of seven aircraft engines that Delta improperly retained possession of following the termination of an engine maintenance memorandum of understanding (the "MOU") executed between Mesa and Delta. Delta has claimed its retention of these engines is justified as a means to secure recovery of certain disputed amounts related to the memorandum of understanding. The memorandum of understanding does not contain provisions regarding Delta's claims and does not permit Delta's retention of the engines. Delta did not have a legal basis upon which to retain continued unauthorized possession of the engines. On or about August 13, 2008, Delta returned possession of the engines at issue. On August 22, 2008, Delta recorded mechanics' liens on the engines and filed a counterclaim seeking to foreclose on the liens as well as seeking certain payments allegedly related to the MOU. Mesa's action filed in the United States District Court sought the immediate return of all engines currently in Delta's possession and/or control, forfeiture of all claimed liens, as well as damages related to Delta's improper retention of the engines. On November 12, 2008, the Court heard oral arguments on Mesa's motion to dismiss Delta's purported liens and Delta's motion to foreclose on the liens. On November 14, 2008, the Court ruled that Delta forfeited its lien claims as a result of its failure to comply with the timelines set out in the Georgia Lien Statute. The parties' competing claims for money damages are still pending before the Court. A judgment in Delta's favor for damages related to its counterclaim could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

18

On October 20, 2008, Mesa filed a complaint against Mokulele Air Group, Inc. ("Mokulele") alleging claims for breach of contract related to certain amounts owed to the Company by Mokulele under the code-share agreement dated February 7, 2007. Mesa's complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. On November 4, 2008, Mokulele filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii alleging claims for breach of the code-share agreement, attempted monopolization in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and unfair competition under Hawaii statutes. On November 7, 2008, Mesa amended its complaint filed in the District Court of Arizona to add claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of an open account, unjust enrichment, coercion, trademark infringement in violation of the Hawaii and Arizona statutes and the federal Lanham Act, misappropriation of trade secrets, deceptive trade practices and unfair competition. This litigation is in the initial stages and the Company strongly denies having violated any statutory or common law duty owed to Mokulele.

In accordance with the terms our joint venture agreement in China, we are obligated to contribute an additional RMB 196,000,000 or $28.6 million to Kunpeng in accordance with Kunpeng's operational requirements as determined by Kunpeng's board of directors, but in any event, prior to May 16, 2009.

The Company is also involved in a contractual disagreement with another vendor in connection with an engine maintenance agreement regarding approximately $1.8 million in unauthorized repairs performed by the vendor. The Company believes it is not obligated to make this payment. In the event the payment was found to be required, the Company will incur an additional $1.8 million in maintenance expenses.

During the first two weeks of February 2009, the Company (i) issued 3,434,000 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock"), in satisfaction of its obligation to repurchase $1.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2023 ("2023 Notes") from holders of 2023 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2023 Notes and forbearance agreements between the Company and these holders, and (ii) completed transactions with certain holders of its 2023 Notes to purchase an additional $29,071,250 face amount of 2023 Notes in exchange for a total of $1,844,431 in cash, 8,430,457 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock") and $983,937 in aggregate principal amount of the Company's new 8% senior unsecured notes due 2012 (the "2012 Notes").

Also during February 2009, the Company repurchased $19,278,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2024 ("2024 Notes") from holders of 2024 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2024 Notes, including $6,504,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes pursuant to certain puts the Company agreed to accept on or about February 19, 2009. In consideration for the $19,278,000 of the 2024 Notes' face value, the Company issued 94,269,420 shares of its Common Stock.    In addition, the Company announced its intent to immediately resume discussions with certain holders of 2024 Notes to enter into agreements with such holders imminently on terms substantially equivalent to previously announced agreements that were rescinded.   As described in the immediately following paragraph, certain of these holders have subsequently agreed to enter into agreements with the Company on terms substantially equivalent to the previously announced rescinded exchange agreements.      

On or about February 17, 2009, the Company entered into separate agreements with certain holders of its 2024 Notes to (i) exchange $83.7 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes for an aggregate of $4.9 million in cash, 10.9 million shares of the Company's Common Stock, and $16.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2012 Notes. The issuance of the Common Stock and 2012 Notes in the exchange is expected to close on or about February 25, 2009.  

Prior to the transactions described above and without giving effect to the February 19th exchange agreements, $52.1 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2023 Notes and $120.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes were outstanding. $21.7 million of the 2023 Notes' face value was not put to the Company and, as of the date of this report, has not otherwise been repurchased and thus remain outstanding. The outstanding 2023 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than June 16, 2013.   Following the closing of the transactions evidenced by the February 19th exchange agreements described in the preceding paragraph, the put was not recognized for $17.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes and will remain outstanding.  Such outstanding 2024 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than February 10, 2014.    At such time, we may pay the purchase price in cash or shares of our common stock or in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. 

All of the issuances of Common Stock  and  2012 Notes  noted above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) and Section 4(2) thereof.

The Company is also involved in various legal proceedings and FAA civil action proceedings that the Company does not believe will have a material adverse effect upon its business, financial condition or results of operations, although no assurance can be given to the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings

19

15. Subsequent Events

On January 6, 2009, the Company's shareholders approved the increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock to 900,000,000 shares.

With the issuance of a significant number of shares in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, it is probable that this will trigger a Section 382 limitation on the utilization of the Company's NOLs. This will have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. Management is evaluating the impact this will have on the consolidated financial statements. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 rules apply to limit a corporation's ability to utilize existing net operating loss carryforwards once the corporation experiences an ownership change as defined in the rules of Section 382. Generally, an ownership change occurs when within a span of 36 months, there is an increase in the stock ownership by one or more shareholders of more than 50 percentage points.

During the first two weeks of February 2009, the Company (i) issued 3,434,000 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock"), in satisfaction of its obligation to repurchase $1.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2023 ("2023 Notes") from holders of 2023 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2023 Notes and forbearance agreements between the Company and these holders, and (ii) completed transactions with certain holders of its 2023 Notes to purchase an additional $29,071,250 face amount of 2023 Notes in exchange for a total of $1,844,431 in cash, 8,430,457 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock") and $983,937 in aggregate principal amount of the Company's new 8% senior unsecured notes due 2012 (the "2012 Notes").

Also during February 2009, the Company repurchased $19,278,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2024 ("2024 Notes") from holders of 2024 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2024 Notes, including $6,504,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes pursuant to certain puts the Company agreed to accept on or about February 19, 2009. In consideration for the $19,278,000 of the 2024 Notes' face value, the Company issued 94,269,420 shares of its Common Stock.    In addition, the Company announced its intent to immediately resume discussions with certain holders of 2024 Notes to enter into agreements with such holders imminently on terms substantially equivalent to previously announced agreements that were rescinded.   As described in the immediately following paragraph, certain of these holders have subsequently agreed to enter into agreements with the Company on terms substantially equivalent to the previously announced rescinded exchange agreements.      

On or about February 17, 2009, the Company entered into separate agreements with certain holders of its 2024 Notes to (i) exchange $83.7 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes for an aggregate of $4.9 million in cash, 10.9 million shares of the Company's Common Stock, and $16.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2012 Notes. The issuance of the Common Stock and 2012 Notes in the exchange is expected to close on or about February 25, 2009.  

Prior to the transactions described above and without giving effect to the February 19th exchange agreements, $52.1 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2023 Notes and $120.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes were outstanding. $21.7 million of the 2023 Notes' face value was not put to the Company and, as of the date of this report, has not otherwise been repurchased and thus remain outstanding. The outstanding 2023 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than June 16, 2013.   Following the closing of the transactions evidenced by the February 19th exchange agreements described in the preceding paragraph, the put was not recognized for $17.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes and will remain outstanding.  Such outstanding 2024 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than February 10, 2014.    At such time, we may pay the purchase price in cash or shares of our common stock or in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. 

All of the issuances of Common Stock  and  2012 Notes  noted above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) and Section 4(2) thereof.

The following discussion and analysis provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company's results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements including, but not limited to, information regarding the replacement, deployment, and acquisition of certain numbers and types of aircraft, and projected expenses associated therewith; costs of compliance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations and other rules and acts of Congress; the passing of taxes, fuel costs, inflation, and various expenses to our customers; the relocation of certain operations of Mesa; the

20

resolution of litigation in a favorable manner and certain projected financial obligations. These statements, in addition to statements made in conjunction with the words "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "seek," "estimate," and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Safe Harbor provision of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements relate to future events or the future financial performance of Mesa and only reflect management's expectations and estimates. The following is a list of factors, among others, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements: changing business conditions in certain market segments and industries; changes in Mesa's code-sharing relationships; an increase in competition along the routes Mesa operates or plans to operate; availability and cost of funds for financing new aircraft; changes in general and/or regional economic conditions; changes in fuel prices; Mesa's relationship with its employees and the terms of future collective bargaining agreements; the impact of current and future laws; additional terrorist attacks; Congressional investigations, and governmental regulations affecting the airline industry and Mesa's operations; bureaucratic delays; amendments to existing legislation; consumers unwilling to incur greater costs for flights; our ability to operate our Hawaiian airline service profitably; Mokulele Airlines regarding our Hawaiian operation, and Delta Air Lines regarding our code share agreement; unfavorable resolution of negotiations with municipalities for the leasing of facilities; failure of our joint venture in China or changes in Chinese laws or regulations that have an adverse effect on Kunpeng's operations. One or more of these or other factors may cause Mesa's actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement. Mesa is not undertaking any obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q.

All references to "we," "our," "us," or "Mesa" refer to Mesa Air Group, Inc. and its predecessors, direct and indirect subsidiaries and affiliates.

The following discussion and analysis provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company's results of operations and financial condition for the periods presented. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto, contained elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company committed to a plan to sell Air Midwest or certain assets thereof. Air Midwest consists of Beechcraft 1900D turboprop operations, which includes our independent Mesa operations and Midwest Airlines and US Airways code-share operations. In connection with this decision, the Company began soliciting bids for the sale of the twenty Beechcraft 1900D aircraft in operation and began to take the necessary steps to exit the Essential Air Service ("EAS") markets that it serves, and exited all EAS market on or before June 30, 2008. All assets and liabilities, results of operations, and other financial and operational data associated with these assets have been presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations separate from continuing operations, unless otherwise noted. For all periods presented, we reclassified operating results of the Air Midwest turboprop operation to loss from discontinued operations.

Executive Overview

The first quarter of 2009 marked a number of milestones and challenges for us.

• In the first quarter of fiscal 2009 Mesa continued to expand its Hawaiian inter-island operation, go!. Available seat miles increased 15.4% in comparison to the same period in the prior fiscal year. December 2008 generated revenues of $11.6 million dollars which resulted in a pretax income of approximately $0.6 million.  Fuel prices were reduced significantly in the quarter and go! experienced increases in passenger revenue, and load factor.  Departures increased 11.4% and passengers carried increased 11.3% over the first quarter of 2008.

• On November 28, 2008 Mesa announced entering into a settlement with the former controlling shareholder of Aloha Airlines concerning the Aloha Airlines lawsuit over Mesa's Hawaiian inter-island flight services operated under the go! brand name. Under the terms of the settlement and without admitting any wrongdoing, Mesa agreed to make a $2.0 million cash payment, issue shares of common stock equal to 10% of its outstanding shares and provide inter-island travel benefits to certain former Aloha Airlines employees. Under the terms of the settlement, if the shareholder is able to purchase the "Aloha" name in the bankruptcy court auction, it will license the "Aloha" name to Mesa.

21

• Maintenance expense decreased $22.8 million, or 31.7%, to $49.2 million in the first quarter, from the same period in fiscal 2008. The decrease in maintenance is primarily due to a decrease in engine repair costs associated with the termination of power by the hour programs, and a decrease in expense associated with component contracts due to contract amendments. On a go forward basis, our maintenance expense will fluctuate based on actual cost incurred due to the termination of power by the hour programs.

• In the first quarter Mesa financed certain rotable spare parts in the amount of $2.9 million at an annual interest rate of 3.2% for 60 months. The first principal payment of $82,057 is due and payable on the 21^st month. Interest will be accrued and added to the principal of the note for the first 20 months of the arrangement.

• In the first quarter Mesa paid $1.4 million to purchase approximately 9.5% of their outstanding Senior Convertible Notes due in 2023 and 2024 in the amount of $2.0 million and $7.6 million, respectively. The transaction after the payment of accrued interest, commissions and the write off of deferred debt issuance costs, resulted in a gain of $8.1 million which has been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in Gain on extinguishment of debt.

The following material events occurred following the completion of our first fiscal quarter.

During the first two weeks of February 2009, the Company (i) issued 3,434,000 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock"), in satisfaction of its obligation to repurchase $1.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2023 ("2023 Notes") from holders of 2023 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2023 Notes and forbearance agreements between the Company and these holders, and (ii) completed transactions with certain holders of its 2023 Notes to purchase an additional $29,071,250 face amount of 2023 Notes in exchange for a total of $1,844,431 in cash, 8,430,457 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock") and $983,937 in aggregate principal amount of the Company's new 8% senior unsecured notes due 2012 (the "2012 Notes").

Also during February 2009, the Company repurchased $19,278,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2024 ("2024 Notes") from holders of 2024 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2024 Notes, including $6,504,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes pursuant to certain puts the Company agreed to accept on or about February 19, 2009. In consideration for the $19,278,000 of the 2024 Notes' face value, the Company issued 94,269,420 shares of its Common Stock.    In addition, the Company announced its intent to immediately resume discussions with certain holders of 2024 Notes to enter into agreements with such holders imminently on terms substantially equivalent to previously announced agreements that were rescinded.   As described in the immediately following paragraph, certain of these holders have subsequently agreed to enter into agreements with the Company on terms substantially equivalent to the previously announced rescinded exchange agreements.      

On or about February 17, 2009, the Company entered into separate agreements with certain holders of its 2024 Notes to (i) exchange $83.7 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes for an aggregate of $4.9 million in cash, 10.9 million shares of the Company's Common Stock, and $16.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2012 Notes. The issuance of the Common Stock and 2012 Notes in the exchange is expected to close on or about February 25, 2009.  

Prior to the transactions described above and without giving effect to the February 19th exchange agreements, $52.1 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2023 Notes and $120.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes were outstanding. $21.7 million of the 2023 Notes' face value was not put to the Company and, as of the date of this report, has not otherwise been repurchased and thus remain outstanding. The outstanding 2023 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than June 16, 2013.   Following the closing of the transactions evidenced by the February 19th exchange agreements described in the preceding paragraph, the put was not recognized for $17.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes and will remain outstanding.  Such outstanding 2024 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than February 10, 2014.    At such time, we may pay the purchase price in cash or shares of our common stock or in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. 

All of the issuances of Common Stock  and  2012 Notes  noted above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) and Section 4(2) thereof.

22

Fleet

Aircraft in Operation at December 31, 2008:

The Company recorded consolidated net income from continuing operations of $15.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, representing basic and diluted income per share from continuing operations of $0.56 and $0.46 respectively. This compares to a consolidated net loss from continuing operations of $2.8 million or $0.10 per basic and diluted share in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

Approximately 95.9% of our passenger revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 was associated with revenue-guarantee code-share agreements. Under the terms of our revenue-guarantee agreements, our major carrier partner controls the marketing, scheduling, ticketing, pricing and seat inventories. Our role is simply to operate our fleet in the safest and most reliable manner in exchange for fees paid under a generally fixed payment schedule. We receive a guaranteed payment based upon a fixed minimum monthly amount plus amounts related to departures and block hours flown in addition to direct reimbursement of expenses such as fuel, landing fees and insurance. Among other advantages, revenue-guarantee arrangements reduce our exposure to fluctuations in passenger traffic and fare levels, as well as fuel prices. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, approximately 94.8% of our fuel purchases were reimbursed under revenue-guarantee code-share agreements. The remaining 5.2% of fuel purchases have been hedged by the Company.

The following tables set forth quarterly comparisons for the periods indicated below (for continuing operations):

23

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

Note: numbers in table may not recalculate due to rounding

RESULTS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS

Quarter Ended December 31, 2008 Versus the Quarter Ended December 31, 2007

Operating Revenues

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, net operating revenue decreased $61.5 million, or 18.8%, to $265.1 million from $326.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Contract revenue decreased $66.4 million, or 20.9%, driven primarily by a $38.2 million or 33.9% decrease in fuel reimbursement revenue and a 10.4% reduction in aircraft in service.

Operating revenues for go! increased $5.4 million as a result of a 65.4% increase in average fares and an 11.3% increase in passengers. Freight and other revenue increased by $0.5 million primarily due to excess baggage revenue.

24

---

Operating Expenses

Flight Operations

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, flight operations expense decreased $8.1 million, or 8.6%, to $85.5 million from $93.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. On an ASM basis, flight operations expense increased 11.9% to 4.9 cents per ASM in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 from 4.4 cents per ASM in the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The decrease is primarily driven by a $6.1 million decrease in wages and employee related expenses. Additionally, there was a net $1.2 million decrease in aircraft and aircraft related lease expense due to a decrease in the number of aircraft leased year-over-year as well as a shift of aircraft types within our fleet. Flight simulator lease decreased $1.0 million due to a decrease in pilot training.

Fuel

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, fuel expense decreased by $37.4 million, or 32.3%, to $78.5 million from $115.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. On an ASM basis, fuel expense decreased 17.0% to 4.5 cents per ASM in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 from 5.5 cents per ASM in the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Average fuel cost per gallon decreased $0.44, to an average of $2.35 per gallon for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 from an average of $2.79 per gallon for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The cost per gallon decrease resulted in a $14.8 million favorable price variance, of which $0.6 million was related to go!. The reduction in gallons of fuel purchased in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 resulted in a $22.6 million favorable volume variance. The volume decrease is primarily due to a direct supply agreement with United Airlines that now includes fifteen (including 11 new stations since December 31, 2007) stations. In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, approximately 94.8% of our fuel costs were reimbursed by our code-share partners.

In most cases under our code-share arrangements, the Company is contractually responsible for procuring the fuel necessary to conduct its operations, and fuel costs are then passed through to code-share partners via weekly invoicing. The United code-share agreement contains an option that allows United to assume the contractual responsibility for procuring and providing the fuel necessary to operate the flights that Mesa operates for United. United has now exercised this option at fifteen of the stations we operate, and as a result we no longer incur raw fuel expense but do recognize the related fuel pass-through revenue for the into-plane fees for these fifteen United stations.

Maintenance

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, maintenance expense decreased $22.8 million, or 31.7%, to $49.2 million from $72.0 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. On an ASM basis, maintenance expense decreased 16.4% to 2.8 cents per ASM in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 from 3.4 cents per ASM in the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in maintenance is primarily due to a $16.3 million decrease in engine repair cost associated with the termination of power by the hour programs, a $3.5 million decrease in component contracts due to a contract amendment, and a decrease of $1.8 million in wages and overtime due to decreased headcount. Heavy maintenance decreased $1.3 million due to reduced volume. On a go forward basis our maintenance expense will fluctuate based on actual cost incurred due to the termination of power by the hour programs.

Aircraft and Traffic Servicing

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, aircraft and traffic servicing expense decreased by $3.2 million, or 16.1%, to $16.5 million from $19.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. On an ASM basis, aircraft and traffic servicing expense increased 2.8% to 1.0 cent per ASM in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 from 0.9 cents in the quarter ended December 31, 2007. This decrease is related to a $3.8 million decrease in our code-share operations, offset by an increase of $0.7 million related to our go! operations.

Promotion and Sales

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, promotion and sales expense increased by $0.3 million, or 43.3%, to $1.1 million from $0.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The increase is primarily due to an increase in advertising expenses, which includes credit card and booking fees and travel agent commissions. This increase was driven by an increase in passengers due to additional capacity. These expenses relate primarily to our go! operations. We do not pay promotion and sales expenses under our revenue-guarantee contracts.

25

---

General and Administrative

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, general and administrative expense decreased $3.5 million, or 23.2%, to $11.5 million from $15.0 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The decrease is primarily due to a $2.2 million decrease in legal expenses resulting from decreased legal activities in our go! operation, and a $2.1 million decrease in property and sales taxes. Freight and other expenses decreased by $0.5 million, and utilities expenses decreased by $0.3 million resulting from improved telephone and data lines contracts. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.9 million increase in administrative expenses, and a $0.5 million increase in lease expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, depreciation and amortization expense decreased $0.9 million, or 9.1%, to $8.7 million from $9.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The decrease was primarily driven by the cessation of depreciation on fully depreciated equipment.

Interest Expense

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, interest expense decreased $1.5 million, or 15.4%, to $8.2 million from $9.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. This decrease is largely attributable to lower aircraft interest rates and fewer aircraft in the fleet, which significantly reduced the total aircraft interest.

Interest Income

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, interest income decreased $1.5 million, or 57.3%, to $1.1 million from $2.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in the Company's interest income was due to a combination of lower interest rates and lower balances of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities. At December 31, 2008, the total balance of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and marketable securities was $64.0 million, which was $121.5 million less than the approximate $188.2 million balance at December 31, 2007.

Gain on Extinguishment of Debt

During the quarter ended December 31, 2008 the Company purchased certain senior convertible notes due in June 2023 and February 2024 at a substantial discount and recorded a gain of approximately $8.1 million.

Income from Equity Method Investments

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, income from equity method investments increased $2.3 million, to income of $1.2 million from a loss of $1.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The increase is primarily due to recognizing income for our share of our investment in a closely held airline related business in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as compared to recognizing our share of losses in the quarter ended December 31, 2007. This positive variance was partially offset by recognizing income for our share our investment in Kunpeng Airlines in the quarter ended December 31, 2007.

Other Income (Expense)

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, other income decreased $4.4 million to an expense of $0.5 million from income of $3.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in income is primarily attributable to: net realized gains from the sales of investment securities decreased $0.4 million, unrealized gains on investment securities decreased $3.5 million, and other net gains decreased $0.3 million.

Income Taxes

In the quarter ended December 31, 2008, our effective tax rate decreased to 2.4% from 33.6% for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in our effective tax rate is primarily due to the fact that Mesa has fully valued the deferred taxes, the estimated profit this quarter, which would be offset by net operating loss carryforwards, would systematically adjust the amount of valuation allowance recorded against the net operating loss carryforwards. This in turns leaves only the state taxes on stand-alone jurisdictions affecting tax expense.

With the issuance of a significant number of shares in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, it is probable that this will trigger a Section 382 limitation on the utilization of the Company's NOLs. This will have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

26

---

Internal Revenue Code Section 382 rules apply to limit a corporation's ability to utilize existing net operating loss carryforwards once the corporation experiences an ownership change as defined in the rules of Section 382. Generally, an ownership change occurs when within a span of 36 months, there is an increase in the stock ownership by one or more shareholders of more than 50 percentage points. If the Company should incur an ownership change or significant equity event in the future, the Company may be limited to an annual limitation on the use of its net operating loss carryforwards.

RESULTS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we committed to a plan to sell Air Midwest or certain of Air Midwest's assets. In connection with this decision, the Company began soliciting bids for the sale of the twenty Beechcraft 1900D aircraft in operation and began to take the necessary steps to exit the EAS markets that we serve. As of June 30, 2008 the Company has exited all remaining markets, including EAS. For all periods presented, we reclassified operating results of the Air Midwest turboprop operation to loss from discontinued operations. All assets and liabilities associated with discontinued operations were reclassified to the balance sheet captions "Assets of discontinued operations" and "Liabilities of discontinued operations," respectively.

Net loss from discontinued operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was $0.2 million, compared to a loss from discontinued operations of $1.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in net losses from discontinued operations for the comparative year over year periods is primarily attributable to Air Midwest's operations ceasing as of June 30, 2008.

Only interest expense directly associated with the debt outstanding in connection with the owned aircraft is included in discontinued operations. No general overhead or interest expense not directly related to the Air Midwest turboprop operation has been included within discontinued operations.

The Company continued to market the remaining 20 Beechcraft 1900D aircraft during the first quarter of 2009. The Company has concluded that the fair value of the remaining 20 aircraft is equal to or greater than the carrying value at December 31, 2008.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Sources and Uses of Cash

At December 31, 2008, the Company had cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (including current and noncurrent restricted cash) of $64.0 million (including $13.6 million of restricted cash), compared to $64.9 million (including $13.9 million of restricted cash) at September 30, 2008. Our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities are intended to be used for working capital and capital expenditures.

Sources of cash included $12.1 million provided from operations, due primarily to $15.3 million in income from operations, partially offset by other changes in assets and liabilities

Uses of cash included principal payments on short-term and long term debt of $8.2 million, capital expenditures of $8.2 million offset by the financing of rotable inventory of $3.0 million and the proceeds from receipt of deferred credits of $2.0 million.

As of December 31, 2008, we had net receivables of approximately $26.5 million, compared to net receivables of approximately $32.4 million as of September 30, 2008. The amounts due consist primarily of receivables from our code-share partners, federal excise tax refunds on fuel, manufacturers credits and passenger ticket receivables due through the Airline Clearing House. Accounts receivable from our code-share partners was 32.2% of total gross accounts receivable at December 31, 2008.

Recent Developments Affecting Our Liquidity

In November 2007, we posted a $90.0 million bond in our litigation case with Hawaiian Airlines, which covered the original $80.0 million judgment, $4.7 million in legal fees, $3.4 million in interest and $1.9 million for additional costs. The bond was funded from cash on hand. See disclosure under "Litigation" for a summary of the Hawaiian Airlines litigation and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court's ruling therein. On April 30, 2008, the Company reached a settlement of its suit with Hawaiian airlines. Under the terms of the settlement and without admitting any wrong doing, Mesa received $37.5 million from the bond it had previously posted with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Hawaii. Hawaiian airlines retained the remaining collateral of the bond totaling $52.5 million.

On May 20, 2008, the Company's board of directors approved separate agreements reached by the Company with certain of the holders of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2023 (the "2023 Notes"). As previously disclosed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the holders of the 2023 Notes had the right to require the Company to repurchase the 2023 Notes on June 16, 2008 ("the Put") at a price of $397.27 per $1,000 note ("the Put Price") plus any accrued and unpaid cash interest. If all of

27

---

the holders of the 2023 Notes had exercised this right the Company would have been required to repurchase the Notes for approximately $37.8 million in cash, common stock, or a combination thereof.

Under the terms of these arrangements, holders holding approximately $77.8 million in aggregate face amount of the 2024 Notes (representing approximately 82% of the aggregate face amount of the Note outstanding) have agreed to forbear from exercising their Put Right with respect to the 75% in aggregate face amount of Notes owned by such holders (i.e. $23.3 million of the $37.8 million subject to the Put). In consideration for such agreement, the Company agreed to purchase 25% in aggregate face amount of such holder's Notes at a purchase price equal to 75% of the Put Price and the right to require the Company to repurchase such Notes on January 31, 2009. The put price payable on January 31, 2009 will also be payable in cash, common stock, or a combination thereof, at the Company's election. The Company's aggregate payment obligation with respect to such purchased Notes is approximately $6.0 million, including accrued and unpaid interest, which was paid on May 22, 2008. In consideration for such forbearance agreement, the Company also agreed to issue to such holders two-year warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock for each $1 million in aggregate face amount of Notes deferred (or an aggregate of approximately 1.46 million shares of common stock.) The warrants have a per share exercise price of $1.00, contain anti-dilutive protection for major corporate events, such as stock splits and stock dividends, and are not exercisable to the extent the exercise thereof would cause the holder to beneficially own greater than 4.99% of the Company's outstanding capital stock.

In the first quarter Mesa paid $1.4 million to purchase approximately 9.5% of their outstanding Senior Convertible Notes due in 2023 and 2024 in the amount of $2.0 million and $7.6 million respectively. The transaction after the payment of accrued interest, commissions and the write off of deferred debt issuance costs, resulted in a gain of $8.1 million which has been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in Gain on extinguishment of debt.

On March 28, 2008 Delta notified the Company of its intent to terminate the Delta Connection Agreement among Delta, the Company, and the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Freedom Airlines, Inc., alleging failure to maintain a specified completion rate with respect to its ERJ-145 Delta connection flights during three months of the six-month period ended February 2008.

Following Delta's termination notification, the Company filed a Complaint on April 7, 2008 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. An evidentiary hearing was conducted on May 27 through May 29, 2008. Following the hearing, the Court ruled in the Company's favor and issued a preliminary injunction against Delta.

The effect of this ruling is to prohibit Delta from terminating the Delta Connection Agreement covering the ERJ-145 aircraft operated by Freedom, based on Freedom's completion rate prior to April 2008, pending a final trial at a date to be determined by the Court. On June 27, 2008, Delta filed a Notice of Appeal and on July 15, 2008, Delta filed a motion requesting that the appeal be heard on an expedited basis. Delta and the Company have fully briefed the issue on appeal and oral arguments in the 11^th Circuit Court of Appeals were held on January 30, 2009.

While the Company's cash flows from operations and its available capital are sufficient to meet its current operating expenses, lease obligations and debt service requirements for at least the next 12 months, the Company's future cash flow from operations and available capital will be negatively impacted by (i) our ability to secure more flexible credit terms from certain of the Company's other key vendors; (ii) reduced cash payments from our code-share partners related to disputed items under our agreements (iii) the Company's ability to restructure certain of its aircraft lease obligations and key vendor obligations, and (iv) the results of the Company's ongoing litigation with Delta. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in effecting amended lease terms for its existing aircraft lease obligations and obtaining flexible credit terms from existing vendors and suppliers. Unfavorable events arising with respect to negotiations with key lessors and vendors and the Delta litigation could give rise to covenant and payment defaults under the terms of the Company's material operating leases and indebtedness. In the absence of obtaining additional capital through asset sales, consensual restructuring of debt and lease terms and/or similar measures, the Company may be unable to remedy such defaults and may experience additional defaults in the future. The Company's operating leases are subject to termination in the event of default, and the Company's indebtedness may be accelerated in the event of continuing default. Certain lenders could foreclose on Company assets securing their indebtedness. Accordingly, the Company's financial condition could require that the Company seek additional protection under applicable reorganization laws in order to avoid or delay actions by its creditors and lessors which could materially adversely affect the Company's operations and ability to operate as a going concern.

During the first two weeks of February 2009, the Company (i) issued 3,434,000 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock"), in satisfaction of its obligation to repurchase $1.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2023 ("2023 Notes") from holders of 2023 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2023 Notes and forbearance agreements between the Company and these holders, and (ii) completed transactions with

28

---

certain holders of its 2023 Notes to purchase an additional $29,071,250 face amount of 2023 Notes in exchange for a total of $1,844,431 in cash, 8,430,457 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock") and $983,937 in aggregate principal amount of the Company's new 8% senior unsecured notes due 2012 (the "2012 Notes").

Also during February 2009, the Company repurchased $19,278,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2024 ("2024 Notes") from holders of 2024 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2024 Notes, including $6,504,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes pursuant to certain puts the Company agreed to accept on or about February 19, 2009. In consideration for the $19,278,000 of the 2024 Notes' face value, the Company issued 94,269,420 shares of its Common Stock.    In addition, the Company announced its intent to immediately resume discussions with certain holders of 2024 Notes to enter into agreements with such holders imminently on terms substantially equivalent to previously announced agreements that were rescinded.   As described in the immediately following paragraph, certain of these holders have subsequently agreed to enter into agreements with the Company on terms substantially equivalent to the previously announced rescinded exchange agreements.      

On or about February 17, 2009, the Company entered into separate agreements with certain holders of its 2024 Notes to (i) exchange $83.7 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes for an aggregate of $4.9 million in cash, 10.9 million shares of the Company's Common Stock, and $16.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2012 Notes. The issuance of the Common Stock and 2012 Notes in the exchange is expected to close on or about February 25, 2009.

Prior to the transactions described above and without giving effect to the February 19th exchange agreements, $52.1 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2023 Notes and $120.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes were outstanding. $21.7 million of the 2023 Notes' face value was not put to the Company and, as of the date of this report, has not otherwise been repurchased and thus remain outstanding. The outstanding 2023 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than June 16, 2013.   Following the closing of the transactions evidenced by the February 19th exchange agreements described in the preceding paragraph, the put was not recognized for $17.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes and will remain outstanding.  Such outstanding 2024 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than February 10, 2014.    At such time, we may pay the purchase price in cash or shares of our common stock or in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. 

All of the issuances of Common Stock  and  2012 Notes  noted above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) and Section 4(2) thereof.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements of the types described in the categories set forth the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.

Contractual Obligations

There were no significant changes to the cash obligations as set forth in Item 7 of the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 except as set forth below.

During the first two weeks of February 2009, the Company (i) issued 3,434,000 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock"), in satisfaction of its obligation to repurchase $1.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2023 ("2023 Notes") from holders of 2023 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2023 Notes and forbearance agreements between the Company and these holders, and (ii) completed transactions with certain holders of its 2023 Notes to purchase an additional $29,071,250 face amount of 2023 Notes in exchange for a total of $1,844,431 in cash, 8,430,457 shares of its common stock, no par value (the "Common Stock") and $983,937 in aggregate principal amount of the Company's new 8% senior unsecured notes due 2012 (the "2012 Notes").

Also during February 2009, the Company repurchased $19,278,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of its Senior Convertible Notes due 2024 ("2024 Notes") from holders of 2024 Notes that had exercised their put rights arising under the indenture governing the 2024 Notes, including $6,504,000 in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes pursuant to certain puts the Company agreed to accept on or about February 19, 2009. In consideration for the $19,278,000 of the 2024 Notes' face value, the Company issued 94,269,420 shares of its Common Stock.    In addition, the Company announced its intent to immediately resume discussions with certain holders of 2024 Notes to enter into agreements with such holders imminently on terms substantially equivalent to previously announced agreements that were rescinded.   As described in the immediately following paragraph, certain of these holders have subsequently agreed to enter into agreements with the Company on terms substantially equivalent to the previously announced rescinded exchange agreements.

29

---

On or about February 17, 2009, the Company entered into separate agreements with certain holders of its 2024 Notes to (i) exchange $83.7 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes for an aggregate of $4.9 million in cash, 10.9 million shares of the Company's Common Stock, and $16.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2012 Notes. The issuance of the Common Stock and 2012 Notes in the exchange is expected to close on or about February 25, 2009.  

Prior to the transactions described above and without giving effect to the February 19th exchange agreements, $52.1 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2023 Notes and $120.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 2024 Notes were outstanding. $21.7 million of the 2023 Notes' face value was not put to the Company and, as of the date of this report, has not otherwise been repurchased and thus remain outstanding. The outstanding 2023 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than June 16, 2013.   Following the closing of the transactions evidenced by the February 19th exchange agreements described in the preceding paragraph, the put was not recognized for $17.4 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of the 2024 Notes and will remain outstanding.  Such outstanding 2024 Notes may be put to the Company no earlier than February 10, 2014.    At such time, we may pay the purchase price in cash or shares of our common stock or in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. 

All of the issuances of Common Stock  and  2012 Notes  noted above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) and Section 4(2) thereof.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, we identified certain policies and estimates as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our past or present results of operations. These policies and estimates are considered critical because they had a material impact, or they have the potential to have a material impact, on our financial statements and because they require significant judgments, assumptions or estimates. Our preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We believe that the estimates, judgment and assumptions made when accounting for these matters are reasonable, based on information available at the time they are made. However, there can be no assurance that actual results will differ from those estimates. We have made no significant change in our critical accounting policies since September 30, 2008.

AIRCRAFT

The following table lists the aircraft owned and leased by the Company for scheduled operations as of December 31, 2008:

		Number of Aircraft
Type of Aircraft		Owned		Leased		Total		Operating on December 31, 2008		Passenger Capacity
CRJ-200 Regional Jet (A)(D)		2		48		50		43		50
CRJ-700 Regional Jet		8		12		20		20		66
CRJ-900 Regional Jet		14		24		38		38		86
ERJ 145 Jet (B)		0		36		36		34		50
Beechcraft 1900D (C)		20		0		20		0		19
Dash 8		0		16		16		16		37
Total		44		136		180		151
(A) Five aircraft sub-leased to Kunpeng Airlines
(B) Two aircraft sub-leased to Trans States Airlines.
(C) These aircraft are associated with Air Midwest and are included within assets of discontinued operations.
(D) One CRJ 200 is parked and held for lease return in the second quarter 2009.

____________

Fleet Plans

CRJ Program

As of December 31, 2008, the Company operated 101 Canadair Regional Jets (43 CRJ-200, 20 CRJ-700 and 38 CRJ-900s).

30

---

In January 2004, we exercised options to purchase twenty CRJ-900 aircraft (seven of which can be converted to CRJ-700 aircraft.) As of September 30, 2007, we had taken delivery of thirteen CRJ-900 aircraft and five CRJ-700 aircraft. The obligation to purchase the remaining two CRJ-900's (which can be converted to CRJ-700's) was terminated In June 2007 in connection with our agreement to purchase 10 new CRJ-700 NextGen aircraft.

ERJ Program

As of December 31, 2008, the Company operated 34 Embraer 145 aircraft and sub-leased two to Trans States Airlines, Inc. We acquired all 36 ERJ-145s through a June 1999 agreement with Empresa Brasiliera de Aeronautica S.A. ("Embraer").

Beechcraft 1900D

As of December 31, 2008, we owned 20 Beechcraft 1900D aircraft, which are included in discontinued operations.

Dash-8

As of December 31, 2008, we operated 16 Dash-8 aircraft in operation; 10 with United Express and 6 with US Airways Express.

Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure about Market Risk.

There were no material changes in the Company's market risk from September 30, 2008 to December 31, 2008.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company's management evaluated, with the participation of the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Disclosure controls and procedures are defined as those controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We continue to take steps to remediate the material weakness noted in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. We began an aggressive recruiting campaign and have hired professional consultants to fill key positions until permanent replacements are hired. We believe these steps will provide adequate short-term solutions as we recruit hire and train the appropriate full time personnel.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

On January 9, 2007, Aloha Airlines filed suit against Mesa Air Group in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. The complaint seeks damages and injunctive relief. Aloha alleges that Mesa's inter-island air fares are below cost and that Mesa is, therefore, violating specific provisions of the Sherman Act. Aloha also alleges breach of contract and fraud by Mesa in connection with two confidentiality agreements, one entered into in 2005 and the other in 2006. Mesa denies any attempt at monopolization of the inter-island market and further denies any improper use of the data furnished by Aloha while Mesa was considering a bid for Aloha during its bankruptcy proceedings. On November 28, 2008, Mesa Air Group, Inc. ("Mesa") entered into a settlement and release agreement ("Settlement Agreement"), effective as of November 28, 2008, with certain affiliates of the Yucaipa Companies LLC (collectively, "Yucaipa"), which purchased Aloha suit in the bankruptcy case, relating to the action entitled Aloha Airlines, Inc., et al. v. Mesa Air Group, Inc. before the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii (Case No. CV 07-00007 DAE/BMK) (the

31

---

"Action"). The Settlement Agreement fully and finally settles all issues and disputes that were raised, or could have been raised, by Yucaipa, Mesa, or Aloha Airlines, Inc. and Aloha Air Group Inc. (collectively, "Aloha") in connection with the Action.

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Yucaipa will fully and finally released Mesa and its affiliates, and Mesa will fully and finally released Yucaipa and its affiliates, from all past, present or future claims related to the Action, including all claims unknown at the time of execution of the Settlement Agreement, and/or arising out of certain non-disclosure agreements and Mesa's introduction of flight service into the Hawaiian inter-island market. Yucaipa's release, which will be effective February 29, 2009, includes the release of any claims relating to the Action that were or could have been brought by Aloha because Yucaipa previously acquired all of Aloha's interests and rights in the Action.

In consideration for Yucaipa's release, Mesa has agreed to issue approximately 2.7 million shares of its common stock to Yucaipa and make a cash payment of $2 million to Yucaipa. Mesa has also agreed to register the shares of common stock it issues to Yucaipa with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In addition, under the Settlement Agreement, Mesa and Yucaipa agreed to establish a licensing and profit sharing arrangement whereby, in the event that Yucaipa is able to acquire from Aloha in an upcoming bankruptcy court auction the rights to the names "Aloha" and "Aloha Airlines," Yucaipa will enter into a license agreement with Mesa to license such names to Mesa for ten years (the "Term") in exchange for royalty payments by Mesa and Mesa will pay to Yucaipa a set percentage of the pre-tax operating profits from Mesa's operations in the Hawaiian inter-island market. Specifically, for each year during the Term, Mesa will pay Yucaipa 1% of the passenger ticket revenue generated from all Hawaiian inter-island flight operations, subject to a minimum annual revenue payment of $600,000 (the "Revenue Payments"), and will also pay Yucaipa 30% of the pre-tax operating profits from Mesa's operations in the Hawaiian inter-island market less the Revenue Payments.

If Mesa ceases inter-island flight operations in Hawaii, Mesa has the right to terminate the licensing and profit sharing arrangement.  Mesa will provide Yucaipa with a $5 million promissory note payable over five years, at LIBOR +350 basis points interest, reset quarterly, that will become payable if Mesa ceases operations in the Hawaiian inter-island market or breaches the Settlement Agreement. If, at the end of the first five years of the Term, the note has not become payable as a result of Mesa's cessation of operations or breach, the principal owing on the note will decrease automatically on a straight-line basis over the remaining five years of the Term. If Mesa ceases operations in Hawaii or breaches the Settlement Agreement during the final five years of the Term, the amount payable on the note would be the principal remaining at the time of such cessation or breach. The note will be secured by a first priority lien on certain Mesa assets with a fair market value equal to 125% of the principal amount of the note.

The Settlement Agreement also provides that the parties will take certain further actions to seek the dismissal, with prejudice, of the entire Action.

On March 28, 2008, Delta notified the Company of its intent to terminate the Delta Connection Agreement among Delta, the Company, and the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Freedom Airlines, Inc., alleging failure to maintain a specified completion rate with respect to its ERJ-145 Delta Connection flights during three months of the six-month period ended February 2008. Following Delta's termination notification, the Company filed a complaint on April 7, 2008 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (the "District Court") seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. An evidentiary hearing was conducted on May 27 through May 29, 2008. Following the hearing, the Court ruled in the Company's favor and issued a preliminary injunction against Delta.

The effect of this ruling is to prohibit Delta from terminating the Delta Connection Agreement covering the ERJ-145 aircraft operated by Freedom Airlines, based on Freedom Airlines' completion rate prior to April 2008, pending a final trial at a date to be determined by the District Court. On June 27, 2008, Delta filed a notice of appeal with the 11^th Circuit Court of Appeals (the "Court of Appeals") and on July 15, 2008, Delta filed a motion requesting that the appeal be heard on an expedited basis. The Company has responded to Delta's motion in accordance with the applicable rules and the Court of Appeals, after reviewing the filings, denied Delta's request. Delta and the Company have fully briefed the issues on appeal and oral arguments in the 11^th Circuit Court of Appeals were held on January 30, 2009.

On August 6, 2008 Mesa filed a complaint against Delta Air Lines seeking the return of seven aircraft engines that Delta improperly retained possession of following the termination of an engine maintenance memorandum of understating executed between Mesa and Delta. Delta has claimed its retention of these engines was justified as a means to secure recovery of certain disputed amounts related to the memorandum of understating. The memorandum of understanding does not contain provisions regarding Delta's claims and does not permit Delta's retention of the engines. Delta did not have a legal basis upon which to retain continued unauthorized possession of the engines. On or about August 13, 2008, Delta returned possession of the engines at issue. On August 22, 2008, Delta recorded mechanics' liens on the engines and filed a counterclaim seeking to foreclose on the liens as well as seeking certain payments allegedly related to the memorandum of understanding. Mesa's action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona sought

32

---

the immediate return of all engines currently in Delta's possession and/or control, forfeiture of all claimed liens, as well as damages related to Delta's improper retention of the engines. On November 12, 2008, the Court heard oral arguments on Mesa's motion to dismiss Delta's purported liens and Delta's motion to foreclose on the liens. On November 14, 2008, the Court ruled that Delta forfeited its lien claims as a result of its failure to comply with the timelines set out in the Georgia Lien Statute. The parties' competing claims for money damages are still pending before the Court. A judgment in Delta's favor for damages related to its counterclaim could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

On October 20, 2008, Mesa filed a complaint against Mokulele alleging claims for breach of contract related to certain amounts owed to the Company by Mokulele under the code-share agreement dated February 7, 2007. Mesa's complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. On November 4, 2008, Mokulele filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii alleging claims for breach of the code-share agreement, attempted monopolization in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and unfair competition under Hawaii statutes. On November 7, 2008, Mesa amended its complaint filed in the District Court of Arizona to add claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of an open account, unjust enrichment, coercion, trademark infringement in violation of the Hawaii and Arizona statutes and the federal Lanham Act, misappropriation of trade secrets, deceptive trade practices and unfair competition. This litigation is in the initial stages and the Company strongly denies having violated any statutory or common law duties owed to Mokulele.

We are also involved in various legal proceedings and FAA civil action proceedings that the Company does not believe will have a material adverse effect upon the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations, although no assurance can be given to the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings.

Item 1.A. Risk Factors.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part 1, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. We caution the reader that these risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a continually changing business environment and new risks emerge from time to time. Management cannot predict such new risk factors, nor can we assess the impact, if any, of such new risk factors on our business or to the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may impact our business. There have not been any material changes during the quarter ended December 31, 2008 from the risk factors disclosed in the above-mentioned Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008, other than as set forth below.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(A) None

(B) None

(C) The Company's Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to 29.4 million shares of the Company's outstanding common stock. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has acquired and retired approximately 17.9 million shares of its outstanding common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $113.9 million, leaving approximately 11.5 million shares available for purchase under existing Board authorizations. Purchases are made at management's discretion based on market conditions and the Company's financial resources.

The Company did no repurchase any shares of its common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2008:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Cumulative Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plan		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plan
October 2008	-	$	-		17,952,603		11,469,658
November 2008	-	$	-		17,952,603		11,469,658
December 2008	-	$	-		17,952,603		11,469,658

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable

33

---

Item 4. Submission of Matters to vote for Security Holders.

The Company held a Special Meeting of Stockholders on December 22, 2008, at which the stockholders approved the following proposals: (1) the issuance of such number of shares of the Company's common stock as may be necessary to repurchase all of its outstanding Senior Convertible Notes due 2023 and Senior Convertible Notes due 2024 if the Company is required by noteholders to repurchase such notes in accordance with the indentures under which the notes were issued and certain related contractual agreements with respect to the 2023 notes, and if the Company elects to satisfy all or a portion of its repurchase obligations by issuing shares of its common stock ("Proposal No. 1"); (2) the issuance, if necessary, of shares of the Company's common stock that may result in a person, persons, a group, or groups acquiring more than 20% of the Company's outstanding common stock due to the Company's issuance of shares of common stock in satisfaction of its note repurchase obligations ("Proposal No. 2"); and (3) the amendment of the Company's Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000 shares to 900,000,000 shares ("Proposal No. 3"). Abstentions are included in the determination of the number of shares represented for a quorum and have the same affect as "no" votes in determining whether proposals are approved. To the extent applicable for the proposal, broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of determining the presence of or absence of a quorum but are not counted for determining the number of votes cast for or against a proposal.

Results of the voting in connection with this issue were as follows:

Proposal No. 1		For		Against		Abstain
		14,480,781		1,758,900		381,959
Proposal No. 2		For		Against		Abstain
		14,431,075		1,811,939		378,626
Proposal No. 3		For		Against		Abstain
		13,587,193		2,666,302		368,145

Item 5. Other Information.

None

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Number		Description	Reference
3.1		Certificate of Amendment to the Registrant's Articles of Incorporation, effective January 9, 2009	*
4.1	Indenture dated as of February 10, 2009 between the Registrant, the guarantors signatory thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to Senior Convertible Notes due 2012		*
4.2		Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 10, 2009 between the Registrant and certain purchasers of Senior Convertible Notes due 2012	*
4.3		Form of Guarantee (Exhibit A-2 to Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 above)	*
4.4		Form of Senior Convertible Note due 2012 (Exhibit A-1 to Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 above)	*
4.5		Form of Exchange Agreement relating to Senior Convertible Notes due 2023	*
31.1		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a- 14(a)/15d-14(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended	*
31.2		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended	*
32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	*
32.2		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	*

____________

* Filed herewith

34

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MESA AIR GROUP, INC.
	By: /s/ MICHAEL J. LOTZ        Michael J. Lotz        President & Chief Operating Officer        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Dated: February 19, 2009

35

---

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description	Reference
3.1	Certificate of Amendment to the Registrant's Articles of Incorporation, effective January 9, 2009     PDF as a courtesy	*
4.1	Indenture dated as of February 10, 2009 between the Registrant, the guarantors signatory thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to Senior Convertible Notes due 2012     PDF as a courtesy	*
4.2	Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 10, 2009 between the Registrant and certain purchasers of Senior Convertible Notes due 2012     PDF as a courtesy	*
4.3	Form of Guarantee (Exhibit A-2 to Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 above)	*
4.4	Form of Senior Convertible Note due 2012 (Exhibit A-1 to Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 above)	*
4.5	Form of Exchange Agreement relating to Senior Convertible Notes due 2023     PDF as a courtesy	*
31.1	Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended     PDF as a courtesy	*
31.2	Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended     PDF as a courtesy	*
32.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002      PDF as a courtesy	*
32.2	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002      PDF as a courtesy	*

____________

* Filed herewith

36

---