META MATERIALS INC. - Quarter Report: 2017 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒ Quarterly report under
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2017
☐ Transition report under
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______.
Commission file number:001-36247
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES,
INC.
(Name of registrant in its charter)
Nevada
|
74-3237581
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
Organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
5700 West Plano Pkwy, Suite 3600
Plano, Texas 75093
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(214) 432-8002
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes☒ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. Large accelerated filer
☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☒ Emerging growth company ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
☐ No ☒
As of November 14, 2017, there were 60,211,935 shares of the registrant’s common stock
outstanding (the only class of voting common
stock).
1
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Note About Forward-Looking Statements
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
PART I
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
4
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
7
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
|
16
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
22
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
22
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
22
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
22
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
22
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
23
|
2
NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These statements include, among other things,
statements regarding plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future
events or performance and underlying assumptions and other
statements, which are other than statements of historical facts.
Forward-looking statements may appear throughout this report,
including without limitation, Item 2 “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.” Forward-looking statements generally can be
identified by words such as “anticipates,”
“believes,” “estimates,”
“expects,” “intends,” “plans,”
“predicts,” “projects,” “will
be,” “will continue,” “will likely
result,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking
statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that
are subject to risks and uncertainties, which could cause our
actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute
to such differences include, but are not limited to, those
discussed in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2016 and in particular, the risks
discussed in our Form 10-K under the caption “Risk
Factors” in Item 1A therein, and those discussed in other
documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). Important factors that in our view could cause
material adverse effects on our financial condition and results of
operations include, but are not limited to, risks associated with
the company's ability to obtain additional capital in the future to
fund planned expansion, the demand for oil and natural gas, general
economic factors, competition in the industry and other factors
that may cause actual results to be materially different from those
described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated or expected.
We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the
results of any revision to any forward-looking statements, except
as required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements.
As used herein, the “Company,”
”Torchlight,” “we,” “our,” and
similar terms include Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.
3
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
ASSETS
|
||
Current
assets:
|
|
|
Cash
|
$385,935
|
$1,769,499
|
Accounts
receivable
|
609,258
|
603,446
|
Production
revenue receivable
|
7,514
|
7,325
|
Prepayments
- development costs
|
-
|
583,347
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
52,142
|
26,829
|
Total
current assets
|
1,054,849
|
2,990,446
|
|
|
|
Oil
and gas properties, net
|
21,181,020
|
9,392,288
|
Office
equipment, net
|
20,565
|
29,848
|
Other
assets
|
6,362
|
21,066
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$22,262,796
|
$12,433,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$3,434,877
|
$422,684
|
Funds
received pending settlement
|
520,400
|
520,400
|
Accrued
payroll
|
650,176
|
565,176
|
Related
party payables
|
45,000
|
237,044
|
Convertible
promissory notes, (Series B) net of discount of
|
|
|
$91,379
at December 31, 2016
|
-
|
3,478,121
|
Due
to working interest owners
|
54,320
|
54,320
|
Accrued
interest payable
|
147,821
|
6,049
|
Total
current liabilities
|
4,852,594
|
5,283,794
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
promissory notes, net of discount and financing costs of
$880,679
|
|
|
at
September 30, 2017
|
7,183,618
|
-
|
Asset
retirement obligation
|
8,788
|
7,051
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
12,045,000
|
5,290,845
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, par value $.001, 10,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
-0-
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31,
2016
|
-
|
-
|
Common
stock, par value $0.001 per share; 150,000,000 shares
authorized;
|
60,216
|
55,100
|
60,211,935
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
55,096,503
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
95,871,849
|
89,675,488
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(85,714,269)
|
(82,587,785)
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
10,217,796
|
7,142,803
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$22,262,796
|
$12,433,648
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
4
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
|
Three
Months
|
Nine
Months
|
Nine
Months
|
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
September 30, 2016
|
September 30, 2017
|
September 30, 2016
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and gas sales
|
$18,296
|
$34,284
|
$44,548
|
$337,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of revenue
|
(16,499)
|
(49,908)
|
(32,632)
|
(295,208)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
1,797
|
(15,624)
|
11,916
|
42,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative expense
|
866,131
|
787,228
|
2,808,576
|
5,534,933
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
21,980
|
18,005
|
72,415
|
740,059
|
Impairment
expense
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
57,912
|
Loss
on sale
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
146,138
|
Total
operating expenses
|
888,111
|
805,233
|
2,880,991
|
6,479,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
(income) expense
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income
|
-
|
(30)
|
-
|
(30)
|
Interest
income
|
(145)
|
-
|
(439)
|
-
|
Interest
and accretion expense
|
129,302
|
54,662
|
257,849
|
224,520
|
Total
other (income) expense
|
129,157
|
54,632
|
257,410
|
224,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before taxes
|
(1,015,471)
|
(875,489)
|
(3,126,485)
|
(6,660,942)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$(1,015,471)
|
$(875,489)
|
$(3,126,485)
|
$(6,660,942)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.08)
|
$(0.17)
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted
|
60,208,946
|
48,158,456
|
38,775,843
|
40,228,810
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
5
TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(Unaudited)
|
||
|
Nine
Months
|
Nine
Months
|
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
September 30, 2016
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(3,126,485)
|
$(6,660,942)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash from operations:
|
|
|
Stock
based compensation
|
1,039,679
|
3,410,731
|
Accrued
interest payable in stock
|
94,795
|
-
|
Accretion
of promissory note discounts
|
158,486
|
142,867
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
72,415
|
740,059
|
Impairment
expense
|
-
|
57,912
|
Loss
on sale of assets
|
-
|
146,138
|
Change
in:
|
|
|
Accounts
and note receivable
|
(5,813)
|
86,649
|
Production
revenue receivable
|
(189)
|
194,104
|
Prepayment
of development costs
|
583,347
|
(1,000,000)
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
(25,313)
|
38,776
|
Other
assets
|
11,999
|
53,721
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
89,571
|
(290,229)
|
Due
to working interest owners
|
-
|
(36,519)
|
Funds
received pending settlement
|
-
|
520,400
|
Interest
payable
|
54,867
|
(176,933)
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
(1,052,641)
|
(2,773,266)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
Investment
in oil and gas properties
|
(5,189,642)
|
(1,677,980)
|
Proceeds
from sale of leases
|
-
|
1,572,000
|
Net cash from investing activities
|
(5,189,642)
|
(105,980)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of preferred stock
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
Preferred
dividends paid in cash
|
-
|
(320,724)
|
Proceeds
from warrant exercise
|
29,250
|
1,486,942
|
Proceeds
from promissory notes
|
7,338,969
|
518,527
|
Repayment
of promissory notes
|
(2,509,500)
|
(613,629)
|
Net cash from financing activities
|
4,858,719
|
2,071,116
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash
|
(1,383,564)
|
(808,130)
|
Cash - beginning of period
|
1,769,499
|
1,026,600
|
|
|
|
Cash - end of period
|
$385,935
|
$218,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: (Non Cash
Items)
|
|
|
Common
stock issued for services
|
$579,754
|
$587,473
|
Common
stock issued for lease interests
|
$373,431
|
$1,816,096
|
Accounts
payable increase- investment in oil and gas properties
|
$3,057,621
|
$-
|
Common
stock issued in warrant exercise
|
$29,250
|
$1,557,004
|
Common
stock issued in conversion of preferred stock
|
$-
|
$13,399,991
|
Common
stock issued in conversion of promissory note
|
$1,007,890
|
$-
|
Mineral
interests received in warrant exercise
|
$3,229,431
|
$-
|
Warrants
issued in connection with promissory notes
|
$-
|
$80,750
|
Warrants
issued for mineral interests
|
$-
|
$1,630,761
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
$576,190
|
$536,410
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. (“Company”) was
incorporated in October 2007 under the laws of the State of Nevada
as Pole Perfect Studios, Inc. (“PPS”). From its
incorporation to November 2010, the Company was primarily engaged
in business start-up activities.
On November 23, 2010, we entered into and closed a Share Exchange
Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) between the major
shareholders of PPS and the shareholders of Torchlight Energy, Inc.
(“TEI”). As a result of the transactions effected by
the Exchange Agreement, at closing TEI became our wholly-owned
subsidiary, and the business of TEI became our sole business. TEI
was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada in June,
2010. We are engaged in the acquisition, exploitation and/or
development of oil and natural gas properties in the United States.
We operate our business through our subsidiaries Torchlight Energy
Inc., Torchlight Energy Operating, LLC, Hudspeth Oil Corporation,
and Torchlight Hazel, LLC.
2. GOING CONCERN
At
September 30, 2017, the Company had not yet achieved profitable
operations. We had a net loss of $3,126,485 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2017 and had accumulated losses of $85,714,269
since our inception. The Company had a working capital deficit as
of September 30, 2017 of $3,797,745. We expect to incur further
losses in the development of our business. These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern.
The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is
dependent on its ability to generate future profitable operations
and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its projected
development costs and repay its liabilities arising from normal
business operations when they come due. Management’s plan to
address the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern
includes: (1) obtaining debt or equity funding from private
placement or institutional sources; (2) obtain loans from financial
institutions, where possible, or (3) participating in joint venture
transactions with third parties. Although management believes that
it will be able to obtain the necessary funding to allow the
Company to remain a going concern through the methods discussed
above, there can be no assurances that such methods will prove
successful.
These
consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern and therefore, the
financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the
possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amount and classifications of liabilities that may
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company maintains its accounts on the accrual method of
accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Accounting principles
followed and the methods of applying those principles, which
materially affect the determination of financial position, results
of operations and cash flows are summarized below:
Basis of presentation—
The accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited and
have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding
interim financial reporting. Certain disclosures have been
condensed or omitted from these financial statements. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and notes required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“GAAP”) for complete consolidated financial
statements, and should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
The financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis and
include all of the accounts of Torchlight Energy Resources Inc. and
its wholly owned subsidiaries, Torchlight Energy, Inc., Torchlight
Energy Operating, LLC, Hudspeth Oil Corporation, and Torchlight
Hazel, LLC. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to the
prior year’s consolidated financial statements and related
footnotes to conform them to the current year presentation. In the
opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary
to fairly present the financial position as of, and the results of
operations for, all periods presented. In preparing the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements,
management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect
reported amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements
and disclosures of contingencies. Actual results may differ from
those estimates. The results for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of annual results.
Risks and uncertainties –
The Company’s operations are subject to significant risks and
uncertainties, including financial, operational, technological, and
other risks associated with operating an emerging business,
including the potential risk of business
failure.
Concentration of risks –
At times the Company’s cash balances are in excess of amounts
guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The
Company’s cash is placed with a highly rated financial
institution, and the Company regularly monitors the credit
worthiness of the financial institutions with which it does
business.
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -
continued
Fair value of financial instruments – Financial instruments consist of cash,
receivables, payables and promissory notes, if any. The estimated
fair values of cash, receivables, and payables approximate the
carrying amount due to the relatively short maturity of these
instruments. The carrying amounts of any convertible promissory
notes approximate their fair value giving affect for the term of
the note and the effective interest rates.
For assets and liabilities that require re-measurement to fair
value the Company categorizes them in a three-level fair value
hierarchy as follows:
·
|
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
|
·
|
Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly through market
corroboration.
|
·
|
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on management’s
own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair
value.
|
A financial asset or liability’s classification within the
hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement.
Accounts receivable –
Accounts receivable consist of uncollateralized oil and natural gas
revenues due under normal trade terms, as well as amounts due from
working interest owners of oil and gas properties for their share
of expenses paid on their behalf by the Company. Management reviews
receivables periodically and reduces the carrying amount by a
valuation allowance that reflects management’s best estimate
of the amount that may not be collectible. As of September 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, no valuation allowance was considered
necessary.
Oil and gas properties –
The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for exploration
and development activities as defined by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Under this method of
accounting, the costs of unsuccessful, as well as successful,
exploration and development activities are capitalized as
properties and equipment. This includes any internal costs that are
directly related to property acquisition, exploration and
development activities but does not include any costs related to
production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Gain
or loss on the sale or other disposition of oil and gas properties
is not recognized, unless the gain or loss would significantly
alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved
reserves.
Oil and gas properties include costs that are excluded from costs
being depleted or amortized. Oil and natural gas property costs
excluded represent investments in unevaluated properties and
include non-producing leasehold, geological, and geophysical costs
associated with leasehold or drilling interests and exploration
drilling costs. The Company allocates a portion of its acquisition
costs to unevaluated properties based on relative value. Costs are
transferred to the full cost pool as the properties are evaluated
over the life of the reservoir. Unevaluated properties are reviewed
for impairment at least quarterly and are determined through an
evaluation considering, among other factors, seismic data,
requirements to relinquish acreage, drilling results, remaining
time in the commitment period, remaining capital plan, and
political, economic, and market conditions.
Gains and losses on the sale of oil and gas properties are not
generally reflected in income unless the gain or loss would
significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and
proved reserves. Sales of less than 100% of the Company’s
interest in the oil and gas property are treated as a reduction of
the capital cost of the field, with no gain or loss recognized, as
long as doing so does not significantly affect the
unit-of-production depletion rate. Costs of retired equipment, net
of salvage value, are usually charged to accumulated
depreciation.
Capitalized interest – The Company capitalizes interest on unevaluated
properties during the periods in which they are excluded from costs
being depleted or amortized. During nine months ended September 30,
2017 and 2016, the Company capitalized $703,740 and $106,388,
respectively, of interest on unevaluated
properties.
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization – The depreciable base for oil and natural
gas properties includes the sum of all capitalized costs net of
accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization
(“DD&A”), estimated future development costs and
asset retirement costs not included in oil and natural gas
properties, less costs excluded from amortization. The depreciable
base of oil and natural gas properties is amortized on a
unit-of-production method.
Ceiling test – Future
production volumes from oil and gas properties are a significant
factor in determining the full cost ceiling limitation of
capitalized costs. Under the full cost method of accounting, the
Company is required to periodically perform a “ceiling
test” that determines a limit on the book value of oil and
gas properties. If the net capitalized cost of proved oil and gas
properties, net of related deferred income taxes, plus the cost of
unproved oil and gas properties, exceeds the present value of
estimated future net cash flows discounted at 10 percent, net of
related tax affects, plus the cost of unproved oil and gas
properties, the excess is charged to expense and reflected as
additional accumulated DD&A. The ceiling test calculation uses
a commodity price assumption which is based on the unweighted
arithmetic average of the price on the first day of each month for
each month within the prior 12 month period and excludes future
cash outflows related to estimated abandonment
costs.
8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES -
continued
The determination of oil and gas reserves is a subjective process,
and the accuracy of any reserve estimate depends on the quality of
available data and the application of engineering and geological
interpretation and judgment. Estimates of economically recoverable
reserves and future net cash flows depend on a number of variable
factors and assumptions that are difficult to predict and may vary
considerably from actual results. In particular, reserve estimates
for wells with limited or no production history are less reliable
than those based on actual production. Subsequent re-evaluation of
reserves and cost estimates related to future development of proved
oil and gas reserves could result in significant revisions to
proved reserves. Other issues, such as changes in regulatory
requirements, technological advances, and other factors which are
difficult to predict could also affect estimates of proved reserves
in the future.
Asset retirement obligations –The fair value of a liability for an
asset’s retirement obligation (“ARO”) is
recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable
estimate of fair value can be made, with the corresponding charge
capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related
long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its then-present
value each subsequent period, and the capitalized cost is depleted
over the useful life of the related asset. Abandonment costs
incurred are recorded as a reduction of the ARO
liability.
Inherent in the fair value calculation of an ARO are numerous
assumptions and judgments including the ultimate settlement
amounts, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing
of settlement, and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental,
and political environments. To the extent future revisions to these
assumptions impact the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a
corresponding adjustment is made to the oil and gas property
balance. Settlements greater than or less than amounts accrued as
ARO are recorded as a gain or loss upon settlement.
Income taxes - Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and
liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and
operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation
allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets if it is
more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be
realized.
Authoritative guidance for uncertainty in income taxes requires
that the Company recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax
position only after determining that the relevant tax authority
would more likely than not sustain the position following an
examination. Management has reviewed the Company’s tax
positions and determined there were no uncertain tax positions
requiring recognition in the consolidated financial statements.
Company tax returns remain subject to Federal and State tax
examinations. Generally, the applicable statutes of limitation are
three to four years from their respective filings.
Estimated interest and penalties related to potential underpayment
on any unrecognized tax benefits are classified as a component of
tax expense in the statement of operation. The Company has not
recorded any interest or penalties associated with unrecognized tax
benefits for any periods covered by these financial
statements.
Share-based compensation – Compensation cost for equity awards is
based on the fair value of the equity instrument on the date of
grant and is recognized over the period during which an employee is
required to provide service in exchange for the award. Compensation
cost for liability awards is based on the fair value of the vested
award at the end of each period.
The
Company also issues equity awards to non-employees. The fair value
of these option awards is estimated when the award recipient
completes the contracted professional services. The Company
recognizes expense for the estimated total value of the awards
during the period from their issuance until performance completion,
at which time the estimated expense is adjusted to the final value
of the award as measured at performance completion.
The
Company values warrant and option awards using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model.
Revenue recognition – The
Company recognizes oil and gas revenues when production is sold at
a fixed or determinable price, persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and title has
transferred, and collectability is reasonably
assured.
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share – Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed
by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed in the
same way as basic earnings (loss) per common share except that the
denominator is increased to include the number of additional common
shares that would be outstanding if all potential common shares had
been issued and if the additional common shares were
dilutive. The calculation of diluted earnings per share
excludes 21,361,231 shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding warrants and options because their effect would be
anti-dilutive.
Environmental laws and regulations – The Company is subject to extensive
federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on
their future economic benefit. The Company believes that it is in
compliance with existing laws and regulations.
9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -
continued
Recent accounting pronouncements – In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU
2014-09, Revenue From
Contracts With Customers that
introduces a new five-step revenue recognition model in which an
entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised
goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires
disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature,
amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising
from contracts with customers, including qualitative and
quantitative disclosures about contracts with customers,
significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets
recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. This
standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The
Company expects to adopt this standard on January 1, 2018 and
intends to elect the modified retrospective method of adoption. The
new standard is not expected to have a material impact on the
financial statements but will require expanded disclosure of
revenues.
In February 2016 the FASB, issued ASU,
2016-02, Leases. The ASU requires companies to recognize on the
balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and
obligations created by leased assets. ASU 2016-02 will be effective
for the Company in the first quarter of 2019, with early adoption
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the
adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
Other
recently issued or adopted accounting pronouncements are not
expected to have, or did not have, a material impact on the
Company’s financial position or results from
operations.
Subsequent events – The
Company evaluated subsequent events through November 14,
2017, the date of issuance of the
financial statements. Subsequent events are disclosed in Note
11.
4. OIL & GAS PROPERTIES
The following table presents the capitalized costs for oil &
gas properties of the Company as of September 30, 2017 and December
31, 2016:
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Evaluated
costs subject to amortization
|
$2,721,503
|
$1,470,939
|
Unevaluated
costs
|
23,980,225
|
13,376,742
|
Total
capitalized costs
|
26,701,728
|
14,847,681
|
Less
accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
(5,520,708)
|
(5,455,393)
|
Total
oil and gas properties
|
$21,181,020
|
$9,392,288
|
Unevaluated costs as of September 30, 2017 include cumulative costs
on developing projects including the Orogrande and Hazel Projects
in West Texas and adjusted costs of nonproducing leases in
Oklahoma.
On
January 30, 2017, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Torchlight
Acquisition Corporation, a Texas corporation (“TAC”),
entered into and closed an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and
Plan of Merger with Line Drive Energy, LLC, a Texas limited
liability company (“Line Drive”), under which
agreements TAC merged with and into Line Drive and the separate
existence of TAC ceased, with Line Drive being the surviving
organization and becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary. Line Drive,
which was wholly-owned by Gregory McCabe, our Chairman, owned
certain assets and securities, including approximately 40.66% of
12,000 gross acres in the Hazel Project and 521,739 warrants to
purchase our common stock (which warrants had been assigned by Mr.
McCabe to Line Drive). Under the merger transaction, our shares of
common stock of TAC converted into a membership interest of Line
Drive, the membership interest in Line Drive held by Mr. McCabe
immediately prior to the transaction ceased to exist, and we issued
Mr. McCabe 3,301,739 restricted shares of common stock as
consideration therefor. Immediately after closing, the 521,739
warrants held by Line Drive were cancelled, which warrants had an
exercise price of $1.40 per share and an expiration date of June 9,
2020. A Certificate of Merger for the merger transaction was filed
with the Secretary of State of Texas on January 31, 2017.
Subsequent to the closing the name of Line Drive Energy, LLC was
changed to Torchlight Hazel, LLC.
Also on
January 30, 2017, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Torchlight Energy,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (“TEI”), entered into and
closed a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Wolfbone Investments,
LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Wolfbone”)
which is wholly-owned by Gregory McCabe. Under the agreement, TEI
acquired certain of Wolfbone’s Hazel Project assets,
including its interest in the Flying B Ranch #1 well and the 40
acre unit surrounding the well, for consideration of $415,000, and
additionally, Wolfbone caused to be cancelled a total of 2,780,000
warrants to purchase our common stock, including 1,500,000 warrants
held by McCabe Petroleum Corporation, an entity owned by Mr.
McCabe, and 1,280,000 warrants held by Green Hill Minerals, an
entity owned by Mr. McCabe’s son, which warrant cancellations
were effected through certain Warrant Cancellation Agreements. The
1,500,000 warrants held by McCabe Petroleum Corporation had an
exercise price of $1.00 per share and an expiration date of April
4, 2021. The warrants held by Green Hill Minerals included 100,000
warrants with an exercise price of $1.73 and an expiration date of
September 30, 2018 and 1,180,000 warrants with an exercise price of
$0.70 and an expiration date of February 15, 2020.
10
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
4. OIL & GAS
PROPERTIES -
continued
Since
Mr. McCabe held the controlling interest in both Line Drive and
Wolfbone Investments, LLC, the transactions were combined for
accounting purposes. The working interest in the Hazel Project was
the only asset held by Line Drive. The warrant cancellation was
treated in the aggregate as an exercise of the warrants with the
transfer of the working interests as the consideration. The Company
recorded the transactions as an increase in its investment in the
Hazel project working interests of $3,644,431 which is equal to the
exercise price of the warrants plus the cash paid to
Wolfbone.
Upon
the closing of the above transactions, the Company’s working
interest in the Hazel project increased by 40.66% to a total
ownership of 74%.
Effective
June 1, 2017, the Company acquired an additional 6% working
interest from unrelated working interest owners in exchange for
268,656 shares of common stock valued at $373,430, increasing its
interest in the Hazel project to 80%.
5. RELATED PARTY PAYABLES
As of September 30, 2017, related party payables consisted of
accrued and unpaid compensation to one of our executive officers
totaling $45,000.
During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company
issued a total of 25,000 shares of common stock in payment of
amounts due to a director for serving on the Litigation Committee
of the Board of Directors. All of the shares are presently unvested
and are subject to vesting at specified future events. The value of
the award has been fully recognized in expense according to its
terms.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued
58,026 stock options in payment of accounts payable to two
directors for 2016 director fees.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued a
total of 237,001 shares of common stock in payment of amounts due
to a director for 2016 director fees and compensation for serving
on the Litigation Committee of the Board of Directors. All of the
shares are presently unvested and are subject to vesting at
specified future events. The value of the award has been fully
recognized in expense according to its terms.
6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceeding
Torchlight
Energy Resources, Inc. and its subsidiary Torchlight Energy, Inc.
has pending in the 429th judicial district court in Collin County,
Texas a lawsuit against Husky Ventures, Inc., Charles V. Long,
Silverstar of Nevada, Inc., Gastar Exploration Inc., J. Russell
Porter, Michael A. Gerlich, and Jerry R. Schuyler that was
originally filed in May 2016 (previous defendants April Glidewell,
Maximus Exploration, LLC, Atwood Acquisitions,LLC and John M.
Selser, Sr have been non-suited without prejudice to re-filing the
claims). In the lawsuit, we allege, among other things, that the
defendants acted improperly in connection with multiple
transactions, and that the defendants misrepresented and omitted
material information to us with respect to these transactions. The
lawsuit seeks damages arising from 15 different causes of action,
including without limitation, violations of the Texas Securities
Act, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty,
breach of contract, unjust enrichment and tortious interference.
The lawsuit also seeks a complete accounting as to how our
investment funds were used, including all transfers between and
among the defendants. We are seeking the full amount of our damages
on $20,000,000 invested. At this time we believe our damages to be
in excess of $1,000,000, but the precise amount will be determined
in the litigation. The case is currently set for trial on
February 28, 2018.
On
April 13, 2017, Husky Ventures, Inc. filed in the above lawsuit a
counterclaim against Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and its
subsidiary Torchlight Energy, Inc., and a third-party petition
against John Brda, the Chief Executive Officer of Torchlight Energy
Resources, Inc., and Willard McAndrew III, a former officer of
Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. (“Husky
Counterclaim”). The Husky Counterclaim asserts breach of
contract against Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and its
subsidiary Torchlight Energy, Inc. and asserts a claim for tortious
interference with Husky’s contractual relationship with
Torchlight and a claim for conspiracy to tortiously interfere with
unspecified Husky business and contractual relationships against
Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and its subsidiary Torchlight
Energy, Inc., John Brda and Willard McAndrew III. We believe the
Husky Counterclaim is without merit and intend to vigorously defend
against it.
On May
22, 2017, the Court granted Gastar Exploration, Inc., J. Russell
Porter, Michael A. Gerlich, and Jerry R. Schuyler’s
(“Gastar Defendants”) motion for summary judgment
dismissing all of Torchlight’s claims against the Gastar
Defendants with prejudice. The only claim remaining related to the
Gastar Defendants is a counterclaim against Torchlight by Gastar
Exploration, Inc. for Torchlight’s alleged breach of a
release that Gastar Exploration, Inc. claims occurred because
Torchlight filed this lawsuit against the Gastar Defendants.
Torchlight alleges in its lawsuit that this release is
unenforceable against all the Defendants including but not limited
to Gastar Defendants.”
Operating Leases
The
Company has a non-cancelable lease for its office premises that
expires on November 30, 2019 and which requires the payment of base
lease amounts and executory costs such as taxes, maintenance and
insurance. Rental expense for the lease was $57,469 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2017 and $60,586 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2016.
11
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES -
continued
Approximate
future minimum rental commitments under the office premises lease
are:
Year Ending December 31,
|
Rent
|
|
|
Remainder
of 2017
|
$23,430
|
2018
|
93,720
|
2019
|
93,720
|
To
2019 Expiration
|
85,910
|
Total
|
$296,780
|
Environmental matters
We are subject to contingencies as a result of environmental laws
and regulations. Present and future environmental laws and
regulations applicable to our operations could require substantial
capital expenditures or could adversely affect our operations in
other ways that cannot be predicted at this time. As of September
30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, no amounts have been recorded
because no specific liability has been identified that is
reasonably probable of requiring us to fund any future material
amounts.
7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 the Company issued
41,322 shares of common stock as a reduction in compensation
payable to an officer, with total value of $50,000.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 the Company issued
3,301,739 shares of common stock in connection with the Line Drive
merger transaction in which the Company acquired oil and gas lease
related costs valued at $3,229,431.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued
200,000 warrants for services which resulted in $24,908 of
recognized expense.
Effective June 1, 2017 we issued 268,656 shares of common stock
valued at $373,430 to certain working interest owners in exchange
for an aggregate 6% working interest in the Hazel
Project.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017 the Company issued
1,007,890 shares of common stock in connection with the conversion
of a previously outstanding 12% Series B Unsecured Convertible
Promissory Note.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017 the Company issued
441,575 shares of common stock for services including 237,001
shares to a director which are subject to vesting at specified
future events. The value of the director award has been fully
recognized in expense according to its terms.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017 the Company issued
29,250 shares of common stock in warrant exercises.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized
$42,312 of expense related to 200,000 warrants issued for services
in the first quarter, 2017.
During the three months ended September 30, 2017 the Company issued
25,000 shares of common stock for services to a director which are
subject to vesting at specified future events. The value of the
director award has been fully recognized in expense according to
its terms.
During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company
recognized $37,959 of expense related to 200,000 warrants issued
for services in the first quarter, 2017.
12
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY -
continued
A summary of warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2017 by
exercise price and year of expiration is presented
below:
Exercise
|
Expiration Date
in
|
|
||||
Price
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.50
|
-
|
528,099
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
528,099
|
$0.70
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
420,000
|
-
|
420,000
|
$0.77
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
$1.00
|
150,000
|
-
|
25,116
|
-
|
-
|
175,116
|
$1.03
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120,000
|
120,000
|
$1.08
|
-
|
-
|
37,500
|
-
|
-
|
37,500
|
$1.40
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,121,736
|
|
1,121,736
|
$1.64
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
200,000
|
200,000
|
$1.73
|
-
|
100,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
$1.80
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,250,000
|
-
|
1,250,000
|
$2.00
|
126,000
|
1,906,249
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,032,249
|
$2.03
|
-
|
2,000,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,000,000
|
$2.09
|
-
|
2,800,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,800,000
|
$2.23
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
832,512
|
|
832,512
|
$2.29
|
-
|
120,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120,000
|
$2.50
|
-
|
-
|
35,211
|
-
|
-
|
35,211
|
$2.82
|
-
|
38,174
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
38,174
|
$3.50
|
-
|
-
|
15,000
|
-
|
-
|
15,000
|
$4.50
|
-
|
-
|
700,000
|
-
|
-
|
700,000
|
$5.00
|
75,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
75,000
|
$6.00
|
-
|
523,123
|
22,580
|
-
|
-
|
545,703
|
$7.00
|
-
|
-
|
700,000
|
-
|
-
|
700,000
|
|
351,000
|
8,015,645
|
1,635,407
|
3,624,248
|
320,000
|
13,946,300
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company
recognized $287,250 of expense related to previously issued
employee stock options.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized
$287,250 of expense related to previously issued employee stock
options and issued 58,026 options in payment of a $54,544 account
payable to directors for 2016 director fees.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company issued
800,000 stock options to four directors for director fees. The
Company recognized $247,500 of expense related to the issuances.
The options are exercisable at $1.10 for five years. One half of
the awards immediately vested and the remaining half is subject to
future vesting over one year.
A summary of stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2017 by
exercise price and year of expiration is presented
below:
Exercise
|
Expiration Date in
|
|
|||||
Price
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.97
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
259,742
|
-
|
259,742
|
$1.10
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
800,000
|
800,000
|
$1.57
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5,997,163
|
-
|
-
|
5,997,163
|
$1.63
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
58,026
|
-
|
58,026
|
$1.79
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
300,000
|
-
|
-
|
300,000
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,297,163
|
317,768
|
800,000
|
7,414,931
|
13
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY -
continued
At September 30, 2017 the Company had reserved 21,361,231 shares
for future exercise of warrants and options.
Warrants and options issued were valued using the Black Scholes
Option Pricing Model. The assumptions used in calculating the fair
value of the warrants and
options issued were as follows:
2017
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.47% - 1.94%
|
Expected volatility of common stock
|
106% - 122%
|
Dividend yield
|
0.00%
|
Discount due to lack of marketability
|
20%
|
Expected life of option/warrant
|
2.75 years - 5 years
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.78%-1.47%
|
Expected volatility of common stock
|
101% - 189%
|
Dividend yield
|
0.00%
|
Discount due to lack of marketability
|
20-30%
|
Expected life of option/warrant
|
3 years - 5 years
|
8. INCOME TAXES
The
Company estimates its annual effective income tax rate in recording
its quarterly provision for income taxes in the various
jurisdictions in which it operates. Statutory tax rate changes and
other significant or unusual items are recognized as discrete items
in the quarter in which they occur. The Company recorded no income
tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 because
the Company expects to incur a tax loss in the current year.
Similarly, no income tax expense was recognized for the nine months
ended September 30, 2016 for this same reason.
The Company had a net deferred tax asset related to federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $53,297,588 and $51,028,330 at
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The federal
net operating loss carryforward will begin to expire in 2032.
Realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent, in part, on
generating sufficient taxable income prior to expiration of the
loss carryforwards. The Company has placed a 100% valuation
allowance against the net deferred tax asset because future
realization of these assets is not assured.
9. PROMISSORY NOTES
On
April 10, 2017, we sold to investors in a private transaction two
12% unsecured promissory notes with a total of $8,000,000 in
principal amount. Interest only is due and payable on the notes
each month at the rate of 12% per annum, with a balloon payment of
the outstanding principal due and payable at maturity on April 10,
2020. The holders of the notes will also receive annual payments of
common stock at the rate of 2.5% of principal amount outstanding,
based on a volume-weighted average price. Both notes were sold at
an original issue discount of 94.25% and accordingly, we received
total proceeds of $7,540,000 from the investors. We are using the
proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes, which
includes, without limitation, drilling capital, lease acquisition
capital and repayment of prior debt.
These
12% promissory notes allow for early redemption, provided that if
we redeem before April 10, 2018, we must pay the holders all unpaid
interest and common stock payments on the portion of the notes
redeemed that would have been earned through April 10, 2018. The
notes also contain certain covenants under which we have agreed
that, except for financing arrangements with established commercial
banking or financial institutions and other debts and liabilities
incurred in the normal course of business, we will not issue any
other notes or debt offerings which have a maturity date prior to
the payment in full of the 12% notes, unless consented to by the
holders.
The
effective interest rate is 16.15%.
On
April 24, 2017 we used $2,509,500 of the proceeds from this
financing to redeem and repay a portion of the outstanding 12%
Series B Convertible Unsecured Promissory Notes. Separately,
$1,000,000 of the principal amount of the Series B Notes plus
accrued interest was converted into 1,007,890 shares of common
stock and $60,000 was rolled into the new debt
financing.
14
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
10. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The following is a reconciliation of the asset retirement
obligation liability through September 30, 2017:
Asset
retirement obligation – December 31, 2015
|
$29,083
|
|
|
Accretion
Expense
|
41
|
Removal
of ARO for wells sold
|
(22,073)
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligation – December 31, 2016
|
$7,051
|
|
|
Accretion
Expense
|
41
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligation – March 31, 2017
|
$7,092
|
|
|
Accretion
Expense
|
41
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligation – June 30, 2017
|
$7,133
|
|
|
Estimated
liabilities recorded
|
1,614
|
Accretion
Expense
|
41
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligation – September 30, 2017
|
$8,788
|
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On November 14, 2017, we and our newly formed wholly-owned
subsidiary, Torchlight Wolfbone Properties, Inc., a Texas
corporation (“TWP”), entered into an Agreement and Plan
of Reorganization and Plan of Merger with McCabe Petroleum
Corporation, a Texas corporation (“MPC”), and Warwink
Properties, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Warwink
Properties”), under which agreements TWP is to merge with and
into Warwink Properties and the separate existence of TWP is to
cease, with Warwink Properties becoming the surviving organization
and our wholly-owned subsidiary. Warwink Properties is wholly owned
by MPC which is wholly owned by Gregory McCabe, our Chairman.
Warwink Properties owns certain assets, including approximately
10.71875% Working Interest in 640 acres in Winkler County, TX. At
closing of the merger transaction, our shares of common stock of
TWP will convert into a membership interest of Warwink Properties,
the membership interest in Warwink Properties held by MPC will
cease to exist, and we will issue MPC 2,500,000 restricted shares
of common stock as consideration. Closing of the merger transaction
is subject to certain conditions, including without limitation MPC
fully closing its transaction with MECO IV, LLC
(“MECO”) for the purchase and sale of certain assets as
contemplated by the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated November 9,
2017 (the “MECO PSA”), of which we are not a party. The
MECO PSA, which is scheduled to close on or before November 29,
2017, also provides that MPC and Warwink Properties are to receive
a 21.4375% (10.71875% each) carried (through the tanks) working
interest in the first well drilled on the Winkler County
leases.
Also on November 14, 2017, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Torchlight
Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“TEI”), entered
into a Purchase Agreement with MPC, under which TEI is to acquire
beneficial ownership of certain of MPC’s assets, including
acreage and wellbores located in Ward County, Texas (the
“Ward County Assets”). As consideration under the
Purchase Agreement, at closing TEI is to issue to MPC an unsecured
promissory note in the principal amount of $3,250,000, payable in
monthly installments of interest only beginning on January 1, 2018
at the rate of 5% per annum, with the entire principal amount
together with all accrued interest due and payable on December 31,
2020. In connection with TEI’s acquisition of beneficial
ownership in the Ward County Assets, MPC will sell those same
assets, on behalf of TEI, to MECO at closing of the MECO PSA, and
accordingly, TEI will receive by assignment $3,250,000 in cash
(which amount is subject to certain pre and post-closing
adjustments). Additionally, at closing of the Purchase Agreement,
MPC is to pay TEI a performance fee of $2,781,500 cash as
compensation for marketing and selling certain Winkler County
assets of MPC as a package to MECO. Closing of the Purchase
Agreement is subject to closing of the MECO
PSA.
Prior to entering into the above transactions, our Board of
Directors formed a special committee composed of independent
directors to analyze and negotiate the transactions on behalf of
Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and determine whether the
transactions are fair to the company. In this role, the special
committee engaged an investment bank which rendered a fairness
opinion on November 13, 2017 deeming that the transactions were
fair to the company, from a financial point of view, with regard to
the total consideration to be received by the company in relation
to the total consideration to be provided by the
company.
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are engaged in the acquisition, exploration, exploitation,
and/or development of oil and natural gas properties in the United
States. We operate our business through our subsidiaries Torchlight
Energy Inc., Torchlight Energy Operating, LLC, Hudspeth Oil
Corporation, and Torchlight Hazel, LLC.
The core strategy of the Company is pursuing the ongoing
development of its assets in the Permian basin consisting of the
Orogrande and the Hazel Projects. These West Texas properties
demonstrate significant potential and future production
capabilities based upon the analysis of scientific data already
gathered in the day by day development activity. Therefore, the
Board has determined to focus its efforts and capital on these two
projects to maximize shareholder value for the long
run.
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited
financial statements included herewith and our audited financial
statements included with our Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2016. This discussion should not be construed to imply that the
results discussed herein will necessarily continue into the future,
or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be
indicative of actual operating results in the future. Such
discussion represents only the best present assessment by our
management.
Current Projects
As of September 30, 2017 the Company had interests in three oil and
gas projects: the Orogrande Project in Hudspeth County, Texas, the
Hazel Project in Sterling, Tom Green, and Irion Counties, Texas,
and the Hunton wells in partnership with Husky Ventures in Central
Oklahoma.
Orogrande Project, West Texas
On August 7, 2014, we entered into a Purchase Agreement with
Hudspeth Oil Corporation (“Hudspeth”), McCabe Petroleum
Corporation (“MPC”), and Greg McCabe. Mr. McCabe was
the sole owner of both Hudspeth and MPC. Under the terms and
conditions of the Purchase Agreement, at closing, we purchased 100%
of the capital stock of Hudspeth which holds certain oil and gas
assets, including a 100% working interest in 172,000 mostly
contiguous acres in the Orogrande Basin in West Texas. This acreage
is in the primary term under five-year leases that carry additional
five-year extension provisions. As consideration, at closing we
issued 868,750 shares of our common stock to Mr. McCabe and paid a
total of $100,000 in geologic origination fees to third parties.
Additionally, Mr. McCabe has, at his option, a 10% working interest
back-in after payout and a reversionary interest if drilling
obligations are not met, all under the terms and conditions of a
participation and development agreement. All drilling obligations
through September 30, 2017 have been met.
On September 23, 2015, our subsidiary, Hudspeth Oil Corporation
(“HOC”), entered into a Farmout Agreement by and
between HOC, Pandora Energy, LP (“Pandora”), Founders
Oil & Gas, LLC (“Founders”), McCabe Petroleum
Corporation and Greg McCabe (McCabe Petroleum Corporation and Greg
McCabe are parties to the Farmout Agreement for limited purposes)
for the entire Orogrande Project in Hudspeth County, Texas. The
Farmout Agreement provides for Founders to earn from HOC and
Pandora (collectively, the “Farmor”) an undivided 50%
of the leasehold interest in the Orogrande Project by
Founder’s spending a minimum of $45 million on actual
drilling operations on the Orogrande Project in the following two
years.
Under a joint operating agreement (on A.A.P.L. Form 610 –
1989 Model Form Operating Agreement with COPAS 2005 Accounting
Procedures) (“JOA”) also entered into on September 23,
2015, Founders is designated as operator of the
leases.
The Rich A-11 well that was drilled by Torchlight in second
quarter, 2015 was evaluated and numerous scientific tests were
performed to provide key data for the field development thesis.
Future utility of this well may be conversion to a salt water
disposal well in the course of further development of the Orogrande
acreage.
The second test well, the University Founders B-19 #1, was spudded
on April 24, 2016 and drilled in second quarter, 2016. The well
successfully pumped down completion fluid in the third quarter of
2016 and indications of hydrocarbons were seen at the surface on
this second Orogrande Project test well. Future utility of this
well may be conversion to a salt water disposal well in the course
of further development of the Orogrande acreage.
On
March 22, 2017, the Company, along with Founders, their operating
partner, signed a Drilling and Development Unit (DDU) Agreement
with University Lands on its Orogrande Basin Project. The agreement
has an effective date of January 1, 2017 and required a payment
from both Torchlight and Founders of $335,323 as part of the
extension fee. Torchlight's portion of the fee was paid by Founders
in April 2017 and will be deducted from the required spud fee
payable to Torchlight at commencement of the next well
drilled.
16
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -
continued
The DDU
agreement allows for all 192 existing leases covering the 133,000
net acres leased from University Lands to be combined into one
lease for development purposes. The time to drill on the unit is
extended through April of 2023 on the first extension. The
agreement also grants exclusive right to continue through April of
2028 if compliance with the agreement is met and extension fee
associated with the additional time paid. The Company's drilling
obligations begin with one well in the first year, and increase to
five wells per year by year 2023. The drilling obligation set is a
minimum requirement and may be exceeded if acceleration is desired.
The DDU agreement replaces all prior agreements and will govern
future drilling obligations on the lease.
Torchlight Energy and Founders have elected to move forward on
planning the next phase of drilling in the Orogrande Project. The
project operator planned to permit two new wells in 2017. The new
wells would be drilled vertically for test purposes and would have
sufficient casing size to support lateral entry into any pay
zone(s) encountered once the well is tested vertically. Torchlight
and the project operator would then run a battery of tests on each
well to gain information for future development of the field. The
scheduled spud date for the next well is no
later than December 1, 2017.
Hazel Project in the Midland Basin in West Texas
Effective April 1, 2016, Torchlight Energy Inc. acquired from
McCabe Petroleum Corporation, a 66.66% working interest in
approximately 12,000 acres in the Midland Basin in exchange for
1,500,000 warrants to purchase our common stock with an exercise
price of $1.00 for five years and a back-in after payout of a 25%
working interest to the seller.
Initial development of the first well on the property, the Flying B
Ranch #1, began July 10, 2016 and development continued through
September 30, 2016. This well was is classified as a test well in
the development pursuit of the Hazel Project. It is anticipated
that this wellbore will be utilized as a salt water disposal well
in support of future development.
In
October, 2016, the holders of the Company's Series C Preferred
shares (which were issued in July, 2016) elected to convert into a
33.33% Working Interest in the Company's Hazel Project, reducing
Torchlight's ownership from 66.66% to a 33.33% Working
Interest.
On
December 27, 2016, drilling activities commenced on its next
Midland Basin, Hazel Project well, the Flying B Ranch #2. The well
is a vertical test similar to the Company's first Hazel Project
well, the Flying B Ranch #1. Recompletion in an alternative
geological formation for this well was performed during the three
months ended September 30, 2017 however the results were uneconomic
for continuing production. It is
anticipated that this wellbore will be utilized as a salt water
disposal well in support of future development.
Following the closing of the new debt financing in April, 2017, the
Company commenced planning to drill a horizontal well in the
Project in June, 2017 in compliance with the continuous drilling
obligation. The well, the Flying B Ranch #3, was spudded on June
10, 2017. At the date of this filing the Flying B Ranch #3 has been
drilled, cased, stimulated and is midstream in recovery of frack
fluid and hydrocarbons. The well continues to clean up and we
expect to have sufficient information in order to publish a 24 hour
initial production rate within the fourth
quarter.
Acquisition of Additional Interests in Hazel Project
On
January 30, 2017, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Torchlight
Acquisition Corporation, a Texas corporation (“TAC”),
entered into and closed an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and
Plan of Merger with Line Drive Energy, LLC, a Texas limited
liability company (“Line Drive”), under which
agreements TAC merged with and into Line Drive and the separate
existence of TAC ceased, with Line Drive being the surviving
organization and becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary. Line Drive,
which was wholly-owned by Gregory McCabe, our Chairman, owned
certain assets and securities, including approximately 40.66% of
12,000 gross acres in the Hazel Project and 521,739 warrants to
purchase our common stock (which warrants had been assigned by Mr.
McCabe to Line Drive). Under the merger transaction, our shares of
common stock of TAC converted into a membership interest of Line
Drive, the membership interest in Line Drive held by Mr. McCabe
immediately prior to the transaction ceased to exist, and we issued
Mr. McCabe 3,301,739 restricted shares of common stock as
consideration therefor. Immediately after closing, the 521,739
warrants held by Line Drive were cancelled, which warrants had an
exercise price of $1.40 per share and an expiration date of June 9,
2020. A Certificate of Merger for the merger transaction was filed
with the Secretary of State of Texas on January 31, 2017.
Subsequent to the closing the name of Line Drive Energy, LLC was
changed to Torchlight Hazel, LLC.
Also on
January 30, 2017, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Torchlight Energy,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (“TEI”), entered into and
closed a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Wolfbone Investments,
LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Wolfbone”)
which is wholly-owned by Gregory McCabe. Under the agreement, TEI
acquired certain of Wolfbone’s Hazel Project assets,
including its interest in the Flying B Ranch #1 well and the 40
acre unit surrounding the well, for consideration of $415,000, and
additionally, Wolfbone caused to be cancelled a total of 2,780,000
warrants to purchase our common stock, including 1,500,000 warrants
held by McCabe Petroleum Corporation, an entity owned by Mr.
McCabe, and 1,280,000 warrants held by Green Hill Minerals, an
entity owned by Mr. McCabe’s son, which warrant cancellations
were effected through certain Warrant Cancellation Agreements. The
1,500,000 warrants held by McCabe Petroleum Corporation had an
exercise price of $1.00 per share and an expiration date of April
4, 2021. The warrants held by Green Hill Minerals included 100,000
warrants with an exercise price of $1.73 and an expiration date of
September 30, 2018 and 1,180,000 warrants with an exercise price of
$0.70 and an expiration date of February 15, 2020.
17
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -
continued
Since
Mr. McCabe held the controlling interest in both Line Drive and
Wolfbone Investments, LLC, the transactions were combined for
accounting purposes. The working interest in the Hazel Project was
the only asset held by Line Drive. The warrant cancellation was
treated in the aggregate as an exercise of the warrants with the
transfer of the working interests as the consideration. The Company
recorded the transactions as an increase in its investment in the
Hazel project working interests of $3,644,431 which is equal to the
exercise price of the warrants plus the cash paid to
Wolfbone.
Upon
the closing of the transactions, the Company’s working
interest in the Hazel project increased by 40.66% to a total
ownership of 74%.
Effective June 1, 2017, the Company acquired an additional 6%
working interest from unrelated working interest owners in exchange
for 268,656 shares of common stock valued at $373,430, increasing
its working interest in the Hazel project to
80%.
Hunton Play, Central Oklahoma
As of September 30, 2017, we were actively producing from one well
in the Viking AMI, and one well in Prairie Grove. The Company also
holds undeveloped acreage in the Rosedale and Thunderbird
AMI’s.
Legal Proceeding
As previously disclosed, in May, 2016, Torchlight Energy Resources,
Inc. and its subsidiary Torchlight Energy, Inc. filed a lawsuit in
the 429th judicial district court in Collin County, Texas against
Husky Ventures, Inc., Charles V. Long, April Glidewell, Silverstar
of Nevada, Inc., Maximus Exploration, LLC, Atwood Acquisitions,
LLC, Gastar Exploration Inc., J. Russell Porter, Michael A.
Gerlich, Jerry R. Schuyler, and John M. Selser, Sr. Reference is
made to the subsection titled “Legal Proceeding” under
Note 6, “Commitments and Contingencies” of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by
reference.
Viking AMI
In the fourth quarter of 2013 we entered into an Area of Mutual
Interest (AMI) with Husky Ventures, the Viking Prospect. We
acquired a 25% interest in 3,945 acres and subsequently acquired an
additional 5% in May, 2014. We had an interest in 8,800 total acres
as of September 30, 2017. (Net undeveloped acres = 2,600) Husky
drilled the first two wells in the AMI in second quarter, 2014. Our
net cumulative investment through September 30, 2017 in undeveloped
acres in the Viking AMI was $1,387,928. In addition the company has
incurred $133,468 as its share of costs related to the early stages
of the construction of a gas pipeline which was to serve the Viking
AMI.
Prairie Grove – Judy Well
In February of 2014, we acquired a 10% Working Interest in a well
in the Prairie Grove AMI from a non-consenting third party who
elected not to participate in the well.
Rosedale AMI
In January of 2014 we contracted for a 25% Working Interest in
approximately 5,000 acres in the Rosedale AMI consisting of eight
townships in South Central Oklahoma. We subsequently acquired an
additional 5% in May, 2014. The Company had an interest in 11,600
total acres as of September 30, 2017 (Net undeveloped acres =
3,500). Our cumulative investment through September 30, 2017 in the
Rosedale AMI was $2,833,829.
Thunderbird AMI
In July of 2014, we contracted for a 25% Working Interest in the
Thunderbird AMI. The total acres in which the Company had an
interest at September 30, 2017 totals 4,300 acres (Net undeveloped
acres = 1,100) Our cumulative investment through September 30, 2017
in the Thunderbird AMI was $949,530.
18
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -
continued
Historical Results for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and
2016:
Revenues and Cost of Revenues
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we had production
revenue of $44,548 compared to $337,798 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2016. Refer to the table of production and revenue
included below for quarterly changes in revenue. Our cost of
revenue, consisting of lease operating expenses and production
taxes, was $32,632, and $295,208 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Property
|
Quarter
|
Oil Production {BBLS}
|
Gas Production {MCF}
|
Oil Revenue
|
Gas Revenue
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcelina
(TX)
|
Q1 - 2016
|
3,000
|
0
|
$92,546
|
$-
|
$92,546
|
Oklahoma
|
Q1 - 2016
|
2,026
|
21,148
|
54,289
|
38,624
|
92,913
|
Kansas
|
Q1 - 2016
|
312
|
0
|
8,854
|
-
|
8,854
|
Total Q1-2016
|
|
5,338
|
21,148
|
$155,689
|
$38,624
|
$194,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcelina
(TX)
|
Q2 - 2016
|
917
|
0
|
$38,812
|
$-
|
$38,812
|
Oklahoma
|
Q2 - 2016
|
675
|
9,689
|
30,411
|
11,142
|
41,553
|
Kansas
|
Q2 - 2016
|
731
|
0
|
24,855
|
-
|
24,855
|
Total Q2-2016
|
|
2,323
|
9,689
|
$94,078
|
$11,142
|
$105,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcelina
(TX)
|
Q3 - 2016
|
464
|
0
|
$20,189
|
$-
|
$20,189
|
Oklahoma
|
Q3 - 2016
|
180
|
2,830
|
7,925
|
6,170
|
14,095
|
Kansas
|
Q3 - 2016
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total Q3-2016
|
|
644
|
2,830
|
$28,114
|
$6,170
|
$34,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcelina
(TX)
|
Q4 - 2016
|
0
|
0
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
Oklahoma
|
Q4 - 2016
|
184
|
2,845
|
8,024
|
8,569
|
16,593
|
Kansas
|
Q4 - 2016
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total Q4-2016
|
|
184
|
2,845
|
$8,024
|
$8,569
|
$16,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma
|
Q1 - 2017
|
101
|
2,303
|
$5,346
|
$7,604
|
$12,950
|
Hazel
(TX)
|
Q1 - 2017
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total Q1-2017
|
|
101
|
2,303
|
$5,346
|
$7,604
|
$12,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma
|
Q2 - 2017
|
140
|
2,332
|
6,594
|
6,709
|
13,303
|
Hazel
(TX)
|
Q2 - 2017
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total Q2-2017
|
|
140
|
2,332
|
$6,594
|
$6,709
|
$13,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma
|
Q3 - 2017
|
132
|
2,041
|
5,733
|
3,727
|
9,460
|
Hazel
(TX)
|
Q3 - 2017
|
204
|
0
|
8,836
|
-
|
8,836
|
Total Q3-2017
|
|
336
|
2,041
|
$14,569
|
$3,727
|
$18,296
|
We recorded depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense of
$72,415 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to
$740,059 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
The decline in revenue, cost of revenue and depreciation,
depletion, and amortization expense is attributable to the
divestiture of oil and gas producing properties beginning in the
fourth quarter, 2015 and continuing through December 31,
2016.
19
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -
continued
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016 were $2,808,576 and $5,534,933,
respectively, a decrease of $2,726,357. Our general and
administrative expenses consisted of consulting and compensation
expense, substantially all of which was non-cash or deferred,
accounting and administrative costs, professional consulting fees,
and other general corporate expenses. The change in general and
administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30,
2017 compared to 2016 is detailed as follows:
Increase(decrease)
in non cash stock and warrant compensation
|
$(2,371,052)
|
Increase(decrease)
in consulting expense
|
$(25,547)
|
Increase(decrease)
in professional fees
|
$(71,387)
|
Increase(decrease)
in investor relations
|
$19,148
|
Increase(decrease)
in travel expense
|
$(11,135)
|
Increase(decrease)
in salaries and compensation
|
$(350,184)
|
Increase(decrease)
in legal fees
|
$22,953
|
Increase(decrease)
in insurance
|
$(12,877)
|
Increase(decrease)
in general corporate expenses
|
$21,116
|
Increase(decrease)
in audit fees
|
$52,608
|
|
|
Total
(Decrease) in General and Administrative Expenses
|
$(2,726,357)
|
Historical Results for the three months ended September 30, 2017
and 2016:
Revenues and Cost of Revenues
For the three months ended September 30, 2017, we had production
revenue of $18,296 compared to $34,284 for the three months ended
September 30, 2016. Refer to the table of production and revenue
included above for quarterly changes in revenue. Our cost of
revenue, consisting of lease operating expenses and production
taxes, was $16,499 and $49,908 for the three months ended September
30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
We recorded depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense of
$21,980 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to
$18,005 for the three months ended September 30, 2016.
The decline in revenue, cost of revenue and depreciation,
depletion, and amortization expense is attributable to the
divestiture of oil and gas producing properties beginning in the
fourth quarter, 2015 and continuing through December 31,
2016.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016 were $866,131 and $787,228,
respectively, an increase of $78,903. Our general and
administrative expenses consisted of consulting and compensation
expense, substantially all of which was non-cash or deferred,
accounting and administrative costs, professional consulting fees,
and other general corporate expenses. The change in general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30,
2017 compared to 2016 is detailed as follows:
Increase(decrease)
in non cash stock and warrant compensation
|
$126,919
|
Increase(decrease)
in consulting expense
|
$132,546
|
Increase(decrease)
in professional fees
|
$(36,774)
|
Increase(decrease)
in investor relations
|
$18,278
|
Increase(decrease)
in travel expense
|
$8,509
|
Increase(decrease)
in salaries and compensation
|
$(102,623)
|
Increase(decrease)
in legal fees
|
$(113,560)
|
Increase(decrease)
in insurance
|
$(6,516)
|
Increase(decrease)
in general corporate expenses
|
$39,504
|
Increase(decrease)
in audit fees
|
$12,620
|
|
|
Total
Increase in General and Administrative Expenses
|
$78,903
|
20
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -
continued
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
September 30, 2017, we had working capital (deficit) of
$(3,797,745) and total assets of $22,262,796. Stockholders’
equity was $10,217,796.
Cash
flow provided (used in) operating activities for the nine months
ended September 30, 2017 was $(1,052,641) compared to $(2,773,266)
for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, an increase of
$1,720,625. Cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities
for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 can be primarily
attributed to net loss from operations of $3,126,485. Cash flow
(used in) operating activities for the nine months ended September
30, 2016 can be primarily attributed to net loss from operations of
$6,660,942. Reference the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for
additional detail of the components that comprise the net use of
cash in operations. We expect to continue to use cash flow in
operating activities until such time as we achieve sufficient
commercial oil and gas production to cover all of our cash
costs.
Cash flow used in investing activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 was $5,189,642 compared to $105,980 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2016. Cash flow used in investing
activities consists primarily of investment in oil and gas
properties in Texas during the nine months ended September 30,
2017. Investment in oil and gas properties during the nine months
ended September 30, 2016 was $1,677,980 which was partially offset
by the proceeds from sale of leases in 2016 of
$1,572,000.
Cash flow provided by financing activities for the nine months
ended September 30, 2017 was $4,858,719 as compared to $2,071,116
for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Cash flow provided by
financing activities consists primarily of proceeds from promissory
notes and warrant exercises. We expect to continue to have cash
flow provided by financing activities as we seek new rounds of
financing and continue to develop our oil and gas
investments.
We will require additional debt or equity financing to meet our
plans and needs. We face obstacles in continuing to attract new
financing due to industry conditions and our history and current
record of net losses and working capital deficits. Despite our
efforts, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to obtain
the financing required to meet our stated objectives or even to
continue as a going concern.
We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future.
Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
The
Company has a non-cancelable lease for its office premises that
expires on November 30, 2019 and which requires the payment of base
lease amounts and executory costs such as taxes, maintenance and
insurance. Rental expense for the lease was $57,469 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2017 and $60,586 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2016.
Approximate
future minimum rental commitments under the office premises lease
are:
Year Ending December 31,
|
Rent
|
|
|
Remainder
of 2017
|
$23,430
|
2018
|
$93,720
|
2019
|
$93,720
|
To
2019 Expiration
|
$85,910
|
Total
|
$296,780
|
Environmental matters
We are subject to contingencies as a result of environmental laws
and regulations. Present and future environmental laws and
regulations applicable to our operations could require substantial
capital expenditures or could adversely affect our operations in
other ways that cannot be predicted at this time. As of September
30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, no amounts have been recorded
because no specific liability has been identified that is
reasonably probable of requiring us to fund any future material
amounts.
21
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Not Applicable.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), we
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of September 30, 2017.
Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to ensure that the information required
to be disclosed by us in the reports we submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the applicable rules and forms and that such
information was accumulated and communicated to our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allowed for
timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
There were no changes during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For a
description of our material pending legal proceedings, please refer
to the subsection titled “Legal Proceeding” under Note
6, “Commitments and Contingencies,” of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
During
the three months ended September 30, 2017, we issued a total of
25,000 shares of common stock in payment of amounts due to a
director for serving on the Litigation Committee of the Board of
Directors. All of the shares are presently unvested and are subject
to vesting at specified future events.
All of the above sales of securities were sold under the exemption
from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The
issuances of securities did not involve a “public
offering” based upon the following factors: (i) the issuances
of securities were isolated private transactions; (ii) a limited
number of securities were issued to a limited number of purchasers;
(iii) there were no public solicitations; (iv) the investment
intent of the purchasers; and (v) the restriction on
transferability of the securities issued.
22
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS -
continued
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
* Incorporated by reference from our previous filings with the
SEC
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
Date:
November 14, 2017
|
/s/ John A. Brda
|
|
By: John A. Brda
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2017
|
/s/ Roger Wurtele
|
|
By: Roger Wurtele
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer
|
24