MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010.
OR
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-26886
MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
13-4148725 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Kensington Centre, 66 Hammersmith Road, London W14 8UD, UNITED KINGDOM
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 011-44-20-7605-1151
Indicate by check whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large Accelerated Filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated Filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of November 19, 2010 the registrant had outstanding 32,550,590 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, (excludes 6,349,793 common shares held as treasury stock).
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 2, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause the results of MGT Capital Investments, Inc and its consolidated subsidiaries (the Company) to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including any projections of revenue, gross profit, expenses, earnings or losses from operations, synergies or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, including the rate of market development and acceptance of medical imaging technology; the execution of restructuring plans; any statement concerning developments, performance or industry rankings relating to products or services; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above include the performance of contracts by suppliers, customers and partners; employee management issues; the difficulty of aligning expense levels with revenue changes; and other risks that are described herein, including but not limited to the specific risks areas discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 2 of this report, and that are otherwise described from time to time in the Companys Securities and Exchange Commission reports filed after this report. The Company assumes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.
The Companys main operating currency is UK Sterling (£).
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
All financial amounts are in thousands except share and per share data.
MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
10,569 |
|
$ |
22,165 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
61 |
|
97 |
|
||
Other receivables related party |
|
68 |
|
105 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
539 |
|
620 |
|
||
Deferred consideration for sale of assets |
|
772 |
|
|
|
||
Loans receivable related party current |
|
1,107 |
|
398 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
13,116 |
|
23,385 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment, at cost, net |
|
265 |
|
290 |
|
||
Investments, at cost |
|
|
|
224 |
|
||
Security deposits |
|
188 |
|
219 |
|
||
Loans receivable related party long term |
|
315 |
|
159 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
$ |
24,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
332 |
|
$ |
916 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
970 |
|
1,214 |
|
||
Deferred revenue |
|
206 |
|
114 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
1,508 |
|
2,244 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 75,000,000 shares authorized; 38,900,383 shares issued and 32,550,590 shares outstanding |
|
39 |
|
39 |
|
||
Additional paid in capital |
|
300,143 |
|
299,878 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(4,888 |
) |
(4,549 |
) |
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(272,679 |
) |
(265,827 |
) |
||
|
|
22,615 |
|
29,541 |
|
||
Treasury stock, at cost, 6,349,793 shares of common stock |
|
(18,912 |
) |
(18,912 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
3,703 |
|
10,629 |
|
||
Non-controlling interest |
|
8,673 |
|
11,404 |
|
||
Total equity |
|
12,376 |
|
22,033 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
$ |
24,277 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
(revised see note 3) |
|
||
Revenues |
|
$ |
62 |
|
$ |
45 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
1 |
|
|
|
||
Gross profit |
|
61 |
|
45 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
1,822 |
|
3,754 |
|
||
Research and development cost |
|
187 |
|
340 |
|
||
|
|
2,009 |
|
4,094 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating loss |
|
(1,948 |
) |
(4,049 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-Operating income / (expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest and other income / (expense), net |
|
(27 |
) |
471 |
|
||
Provision for loan receivable related party |
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
||
|
|
(1,738 |
) |
471 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss from continuing operations before income tax |
|
(3,686 |
) |
(3,578 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss from continuing operations before non-controlling interest |
|
(3,686 |
) |
(3,578 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss from operations of Medicexchange, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss before non-controlling interest |
|
(3,686 |
) |
(3,714 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
854 |
|
1,119 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss attributable to MGT Capital Investments, Inc. |
|
$ |
(2,832 |
) |
$ |
(2,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
32,550,590 |
|
32,550,590 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
(revised see note 3) |
|
||
Revenues |
|
$ |
388 |
|
$ |
146 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
115 |
|
|
|
||
Gross profit |
|
273 |
|
146 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
7,035 |
|
11,176 |
|
||
Research and development cost |
|
1,100 |
|
1,670 |
|
||
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
12,157 |
|
||
|
|
8,135 |
|
25,003 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating loss |
|
(7,862 |
) |
(24,857 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-Operating income / (expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest and other expenses, net |
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
||
Provision for loan receivable related party |
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
||
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
(440 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss from continuing operations before income tax |
|
(9,573 |
) |
(25,297 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income tax benefit |
|
167 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss from continuing operations before non-controlling interest |
|
(9,406 |
) |
(25,297 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss from operations of Medicexchange, net of income taxes |
|
(234 |
) |
(840 |
) |
||
Gain on sale of Medicexchange, net of income taxes |
|
149 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
(85 |
) |
(840 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss before non-controlling interest |
|
(9,491 |
) |
(26,137 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
2,639 |
|
4,367 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss attributable to MGT Capital Investments, Inc. |
|
$ |
(6,852 |
) |
$ |
(21,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
$ |
(0.64 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations |
|
(0.01 |
) |
(0.03 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
$ |
(0.67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
32,550,590 |
|
32,550,590 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
Common stock |
|
Additional |
|
Accumulated |
|
Accumulated |
|
Treasury |
|
Total |
|
Non- |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
capital |
|
loss |
|
deficit |
|
stock |
|
equity |
|
interest |
|
equity |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
38,900 |
|
$ |
39 |
|
$ |
299,878 |
|
$ |
(4,549 |
) |
$ |
(265,827 |
) |
$ |
(18,912 |
) |
$ |
10,629 |
|
$ |
11,404 |
|
$ |
22,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
261 |
|
526 |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Disposal of Medicexchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
(233 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net loss for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,852 |
) |
|
|
(6,852 |
) |
(2,639 |
) |
(9,491 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(339 |
) |
(120 |
) |
(459 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,191 |
) |
(2,759 |
) |
(9,950 |
) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
|
38,900 |
|
$ |
39 |
|
$ |
300,143 |
|
$ |
(4,888 |
) |
$ |
(272,679 |
) |
$ |
(18,912 |
) |
$ |
3,703 |
|
$ |
8,673 |
|
$ |
12,376 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
(revised see note 3) |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss before non-controlling interest |
|
$ |
(9,491 |
) |
$ |
(26,137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
234 |
|
840 |
|
||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
515 |
|
1,504 |
|
||
Depreciation |
|
109 |
|
239 |
|
||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
||
Loss on impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
12,157 |
|
||
Loss on impairment of marketable securities |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
||
Loss on impairment of loan receivable |
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
||
Gain on disposal of Medicexchange and other investments |
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
||
(Increase)/decrease in assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
30 |
|
83 |
|
||
Other receivables related party |
|
36 |
|
(13 |
) |
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
145 |
|
(107 |
) |
||
Increase/(decrease) in liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
(336 |
) |
(1,370 |
) |
||
Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
(273 |
) |
401 |
|
||
Deferred revenue |
|
9 |
|
7 |
|
||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(7,530 |
) |
(11,250 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Issuance of Moneygate loans receivable related party |
|
(1,472 |
) |
|
|
||
Issuance of Dunamis Capital loans receivable related party |
|
(1,100 |
) |
|
|
||
Cash in Medicexchange subsidiaries disposed of |
|
(1,101 |
) |
|
|
||
Sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
947 |
|
||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
(83 |
) |
(21 |
) |
||
Deposit of restricted cash |
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
||
Investment in convertible notes |
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
||
Receipt of deferred consideration |
|
382 |
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(3,374 |
) |
(1,074 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in Medicexchange operating activities |
|
(226 |
) |
(633 |
) |
||
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
(226 |
) |
(633 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effects of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(466 |
) |
1,576 |
|
||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(11,596 |
) |
(11,381 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
22,165 |
|
38,294 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
10,569 |
|
$ |
26,913 |
|
Non-cash items
In the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 the Company disposed of Medicexchange and other investments. The consideration for this was $1,136 which has been deferred and is payable in installments through March 31, 2011. When received, it will be recorded in investing activities.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
1. Organization, basis of presentation and liquidity
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of MGT Capital Investments, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any subsequent quarter or for the year ending December 31, 2010. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
MGT Capital Investments, Inc. (MGT, the Company, the Group, we, us) is a holding company. We currently have a controlling interest in our operating subsidiary, Medicsight plc (Medicsight) and a 49% holding in Moneygate Group Limited (Moneygate). On March 31, 2010 we disposed of our controlling interest in Medicexchange Limited (Medicexchange) and various other investments. We also have wholly owned subsidiaries MGT Capital Investments (UK) Limited, MGT Investments (Gibraltar) Limited, and Medicsight Nominees Limited.
· Medicsight and its wholly owned subsidiaries is a medical imaging software development company listed on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange (Ticker symbol MDST) that develops and commercializes enterprise-wide Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) applications which analyze Computer Tomography (CT) scans to assist radiologists in the early detection and measurement of colorectal polyps and lung lesions. Medicsight currently has limited revenue and is awaiting regulatory approvals in key markets. The Company holds 86 million shares (55%) of the 155 million issued share capital of Medicsight.
· The Company has a 49% holding in Moneygate Group Limited, a UK based firm of Independent Financial Advisors.
The Company has incurred significant operating losses since inception and has recently commenced generating revenue from operations. As a result, the Company has generated negative cash flows from operations and has an accumulated deficit of $272,679 at September 30, 2010. The Companys subsidiary Medicsight is operating in a developing industry based on new technology and its primary source of funds to date has been through the issuance of securities. While the Company is optimistic and believes appropriate actions are being taken, there can be no assurance that managements efforts will be successful or that the products the Company develops and markets will be accepted by consumers.
2. Summary of significant accounting policies
We believe the critical accounting policies listed below reflect significant judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Medicsight
We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue realized or realizable and earned when we have persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been shipped or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is probable.
Software License fee revenue is derived from the licensing of computer software. Maintenance revenue is derived from software maintenance. Our software licenses are generally sold as part of an arrangement that includes maintenance and support.
We license software and sell maintenance through visualization solution partners and original equipment manufacturers. We receive regular sales reporting detailing the number of licenses sold by original equipment manufacturers, value-added resellers and
independent distributors (collectively, Resellers) to end users. We generally offer terms that require payment 30 days from invoicing.
Provided the Reseller i) assumes all risk of the purchase, ii) has the ability and obligation to pay regardless of receiving payment from the end user, and all other revenue recognition criteria are met, license revenue from Resellers is recognized upon shipment of its product to vendors (sell-in basis).
Revenue from license fees is recognized when notification of shipment to the end user has occurred, there are no significant Company obligations with regard to implementation and the Companys services are not considered essential to the functionality of other elements of the arrangement.
Services Revenue from maintenance and support arrangements is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance and support arrangements.
Multiple-element arrangements we enter into arrangements with Resellers that include a combination of software products, maintenance and support. For such arrangements, we recognize revenue using the residual method. We allocate the total arrangement fee among the various elements of the arrangement based on the fair value of each of the undelivered elements determined by vendor-specific objective evidence. The fair value of maintenance and support services is evidence of fair value for all elements, revenue is deferred until the earlier of when vendor-specific objective evidence is determined for the undelivered elements (residual method) or when all elements for which we do not have vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value have been delivered.
Hardware Revenue is derived from the sale of our MedicCO2LON product. This product is an automated CO2 insufflation device, and is generally sold as part of an arrangement that includes a one year warranty. The risk of incurring warranty related expense is mitigated by the warranty contractually agreed with the supplier. The Company will review the risk of warranty liabilities on a regular basis, and will make any and all appropriate provisions accordingly. At the present time, the Company feels that the warranty liability is insignificant and has therefore not made any provision.
MedicCO2LON is sold exclusively through our distribution partner MEDRAD Inc. Revenue is recognized as goods and orders are satisfied and goods are delivered to our distribution partner. We generally offer terms which require payments with 45 days from invoicing.
Equity-based compensation
We recognize compensation expense for all equity-based payments. Under fair value recognition provisions, we recognize equity-based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognize compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the development of assumptions that are input into the model. These assumptions are the expected stock volatility, the risk-free interest rate, the options expected life and the dividend yield on the underlying stock. Expected volatility is calculated based on the historical volatility of our common stock over the expected option life and other appropriate factors. Risk-free interest rates are calculated based on continuously compounded risk-free rates for the appropriate term. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero as we have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on historical experience.
Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of equity-based payment awards require the input of the subjective assumptions described above. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity-based payment awards represent managements best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our equity-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. In addition, we are required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense only for those shares expected to vest. If our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, the equity-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what we have recorded in the current period.
Research and development
We incur costs in connection with the development of software products that are intended for sale. Costs incurred prior to technological feasibility being established for the product are expensed as incurred. Technological feasibility is established upon completion of a detail program design or, in its absence, completion of a working model. Thereafter, all software production costs are capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. Capitalized costs are amortized based on current and future revenue for each product with an annual minimum equal to the straight-line amortization over the
remaining estimated economic life of the product. Amortization commences when the product is available for general release to customers.
We concluded that capitalizing such expenditures on completion of a working model was inappropriate because we did not incur any material software production costs and therefore have decided to expense all research and development costs. Our research and development costs are comprised of staff, consultancy and other costs expensed on the Medicsight products.
Fair value of financial instruments
On January 1, 2008 the Company adopted certain provisions of FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for financial assets and financial liabilities and on January 1, 2009 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. This establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Applying fair value measurements to our financial instruments requires managements judgment, especially when using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs.
Financial instruments
The Company holds financial instruments. Short term trade receivables and payables are held at cost at amounts that approximate their fair value due to their short term nature. The Company also has receivables due from Moneygate (see note 5) that represent a concentration of credit risk.
Investments
Investments in various corporations where our investment is less than 20% of issued share capital are accounted for under the cost method. Investments where we hold between 20% and 50% of issued share capital and we have significant influence over the investee are accounted for under the equity method. Moneygate is accounted for under the equity method.
Impairment of long-lived assets and long-lived assets to be disposed of
We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Our assessment for impairment of an asset involves estimating the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from use of the asset and its eventual disposition. An impairment loss recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Calculating the estimated fair value of an asset involves significant judgments and a variety of assumptions. Judgments that we make concerning the value of its intangible assets include assessing time and cost involved for development, time to market, and risks of regulatory failure or obsolescence (due to market, environmental or technological advances for example). For calculating fair value based on discounted cash flows, we forecast future operating results and future cash flows, which include long-term forecasts of revenue growth, gross profits and capital expenditures.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In October 2009 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, with regards to multiple-deliverable arrangements. The update is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In October 2009 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 985, Software, with regards to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. The update is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2009 the FASB issued an update to ASC Topic 810, Consolidations, with regards to improvements to financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities. The adoption of this update on January 1, 2010 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2010 the FASB issued an update to ASC Topic 605, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, relating to research and development projects. The amendments in the ASU are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In August 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-21, Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules. ASU 2010-21 amends various SEC paragraphs in the FASB Accounting Standards Codifications pursuant to SEC Final Rule, Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules
and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-21 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-22, Accounting for Various Topics. ASU 2010-22 amends various SEC paragraphs in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification based on external comments received and the issuance of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 112, which amends or rescinds portions of certain SAB topics. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-22 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
3. Divestment of investments and discontinued activities
On March 31, 2010 the Company sold its stock in Medicexchange and various non-core investments to an unrelated third party in return for consideration of £750 ($1,136). This consideration is deferred and will be paid in installments through March 2011. As of September 30, 2010 £250 ($379) had been received. The third payment installment in the original agreement was due on August 30, 2010, without interest. At the request of the third party, and in discussion and negotiation with management, it was agreed that the remaining installments would be modified. The revised agreement now includes the following payment installments; October 30, 2010, £75 ($113); December 15, 2010, £175 ($265); and February 28, 2011, £250 ($379).
The October 30, 2010 payment has been received and the next payment is due on December 15, 2010. As compensation for delaying the third installment payment, the last payment will be received one month earlier than in the original agreement.
The investments disposed of and the related consideration is as follows:
Asset |
|
Consideration |
|
|
Medicexchange Limited |
|
$ |
927 |
|
Medicexchange Inc. |
|
1 |
|
|
Hipcricket, Inc. |
|
205 |
|
|
Eurindia Limited |
|
1 |
|
|
XShares equity |
|
1 |
|
|
XShares convertible notes |
|
1 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
Eurindia and the XShares convertible notes and equity investment had been fully impaired so the consideration received represents the gain on sale recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. HipCricket was recorded in the financial statements at $224 meaning a loss on sales of $19 was recorded (see note 7).
Before their disposal, Medicexchange Limited and Medicexchange Inc. were consolidated into the MGT Consolidated Financial Statements. Consideration of $928 was allocated to Medicexchange and MGT recorded a profit on disposal of $149, net of tax. This profit on disposal has been recognized in discontinued operations. In the nine months ended September 30, 2010, discontinued operations contains transactions up to the date of disposal, March 31, 2010. Within this period, Medicexchange attained revenue of $15, operating expenses of $249, and a net loss from operations of $234. In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, Medicexchange attained revenue of $37, operating expenses of $877, and a net loss from operations of $840.
4. Cash and cash equivalents
We invest our cash in short-term deposits with major banks. At September 30, 2010 we held $10,569 in cash and cash equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and temporary investments with maturities of 90 days or less when purchased.
Concentrations
The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents at major financial institutions in Europe. Cash held in foreign institutions is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and amounted to $10,569 as of September 30, 2010 and $22,165 as of December 31, 2009. The Company periodically evaluates the relative credit standing of financial institutions considered in its cash investment strategy.
5. Loans receivable related party
Moneygate
In Fiscal 2009 we purchased 49% of the share capital of Moneygate Group Limited (Moneygate). Moneygate is a related party as we have significant influence over it and have representation on the board of directors. On acquisition we provided loan facilities of £250 ($395) for working capital and £2,000 ($3,162) for acquisitions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 we allowed a portion of the acquisition facility to be used for working capital as acquisitions have been delayed.
On, August 3, 2010 Moneygate agreed to convert all monies advanced to July 31, 2010, of £1,247 ($1,888) and future monies up to £2,000 ($3,162) in total in to convertible loan notes. On August 3, 2010, MGT Capital Investments Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales (MGT UK), and a wholly owned subsidiary of MGT Capital Investments, Inc., entered into an agreement with an unrelated third party for the sale of its Moneygate convertible loan note of £2,000 ($3,162).
Under the terms of the its agreement with Moneygate, the Company advanced additional working capital funding. At September 30, 2010, £900 ($1,423) had been advanced for working capital and £410 ($648) for acquisitions. In October 2010, additional funding was advanced to Moneygate and as at October 31, 2010, £1,025 ($1,620) had been advanced for working capital and £460 ($727) for acquisitions.
Under the terms of the convertible note sale discussed above these additional funds would have been sold as part of the convertible loan sale.
On November 18, 2010, the previously executed agreement to sell the Moneygate convertible loan notes of up to £2,000 ($3,162) to a third party was terminated. Concurrent with the termination, the Company amended its convertible loan with Moneygate to remove the convertible feature and fix its amount repayable at £1,485 ($2,305) with no future advances. The amended loan agreement is repayable on or before 2 years from November 18, 2010. The loan will accrue 5% interest per annum and is collateralized by a debenture over the assets of Moneygate.
The Company engaged an outside valuation firm to perform a valuation on the Companys investment and loan note receivable from Moneygate. This report concluded that on the scenario of Moneygate being unsuccessful in raising adequate finance then the value of the Companys loan note receivable from Moneygate was £199 ($315). On this basis we have impaired the carrying value of the loan notes receivable to this amount, incurring a charge in the period of $1,711.
Moneygate is classified as a related party because the Company has representation on its board of directors (see note 12).
Dunamis Capital
On September 6, 2010, Medicsight made a short term loan of $1,100 (£696) to Dunamis Capital. This is due to be repaid on December 31, 2010, along with interest of $36 (£23). As of September 30, 2010 interest of $7 (£5) has been accrued. Dunamis is a related party as two directors of Medicsight are also directors of Dunamis Capital (see Note 12).
6. Investments at cost
We account for investments in non-marketable securities under the cost method of accounting where we own less than a 20% interest in each of the companies and we do not have significant influence over the entity. We continually review each investment to assess for other-than-temporary decreases in value.
Eurindia Limited
In 2000 MGT invested in Eurindia Limited (Eurindia), a UK company that invested in IT start-up companies. MGT had a 6% holding in Eurindia and accounted for this investment on a cost basis. As of December 31, 2009 this investment had been fully impaired. On March 31, 2010 we disposed of all of our holding in Eurindia for $1 leading to a gain on sale of $1 (see notes 3 and 7).
XShares Group
In 2007 and 2008 we invested $3,000 in Series C preferred shares of XShares Group, Inc. (XShares), an investment advisor that creates, issues and supports exchange traded funds with a particular healthcare specialty. In the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company also invested $2,000 in XShares convertible notes with a principal of $2,100. As of December 31, 2009 the equity
investment and the convertible notes were fully impaired. On March 31, 2010 we disposed of all of our equity holdings in XShares for $1 and the convertible notes for $1, leading to a gain on sale of $2 (see notes 3 and 7).
HipCricket Inc.
In Fiscal 2007 we invested $2,000 in HipCricket Inc., a company engaged in mobile marketing. In the year ended December 31, 2009 HipCricket Inc. was delisted from the AIM Market and we accounted for it as an investment held at cost. As of December 31, 2009 the investment was held at a book value of $224. On March 31, 2010 we disposed of all of our holdings in HipCricket for $205 resulting in a loss on sale of $19 (see notes 3 and 7).
The following table presents the changes in Level 3 instruments for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
Sales |
|
Profit / (loss) |
|
September 30, |
|
Change in impairment |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Eurindia Limited |
|
$ |
|
|
(1 |
) |
1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
XShares Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
HipCricket Inc. |
|
224 |
|
(205 |
) |
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
(207 |
) |
(17 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
7. Interest and other income / (expense)
We had the following interest and other income amounts from continuing operations:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loss on sale of HipCricket |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
$ |
|
|
Gain on sale of XShares convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
||||
Gain on sale of XShares equity |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
||||
Gain on sale of Eurindia |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
||||
Impairment Gain / (Loss) on Eurindia |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
||||
Impairment Loss on HipCricket |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(701 |
) |
||||
Impairment Loss on XShares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
||||
Impairment Loss on Moneygate loan receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest income |
|
15 |
|
32 |
|
66 |
|
303 |
|
||||
Gain / (Loss) on other marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
||||
Other expenses |
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
||||
Currency gain on short term investments |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
$ |
471 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(440 |
) |
8. Comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and items defined as other comprehensive income. Items defined as other comprehensive income, such as foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on certain marketable securities are separately classified in the financial statements. Such items are reported in the consolidated statements of stockholders equity as comprehensive income as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss before non-controlling interest, as reported |
|
$ |
(3,686 |
) |
$ |
(3,714 |
) |
$ |
(9,491 |
) |
$ |
(26,137 |
) |
Unrealized foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
645 |
|
(748 |
) |
(459 |
) |
1,429 |
|
||||
Unrealized (loss) on marketable securities |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(3,041 |
) |
$ |
(4,500 |
) |
$ |
(9,950 |
) |
$ |
(24,708 |
) |
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
595 |
|
1,393 |
|
2,759 |
|
3,444 |
|
||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to MGT Capital Investments, Inc. |
|
$ |
(2,446 |
) |
$ |
(3,107 |
) |
$ |
(7,191 |
) |
$ |
(21,264 |
) |
The total accumulated other comprehensive loss as of September 30, 2010 is the result of net foreign currency translation losses.
9. Reconciliation of Medicsights results and US GAAP consolidated results
Medicsight listed on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange on June 21, 2007. AIM listing rules require Medicsight to publish results under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in sterling.
The following is reconciliation between Medicsights published financial statements and the US GAAP consolidated results:
|
|
Medicsight |
|
Medicsight |
|
Medicsight |
|
Discontinued |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
(IFRS) |
|
GAAP Adjts |
|
(US GAAP) |
|
(US GAAP) |
|
(US GAAP) |
|
(US GAAP) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net revenue to external customers |
|
$ |
388 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
Operating loss |
|
(5,508 |
) |
(359 |
) |
(5,867 |
) |
|
|
(1,995 |
) |
(7,862 |
) |
||||||
Assets |
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
11,873 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,011 |
|
$ |
13,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net revenue to external customers |
|
$ |
146 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
Operating loss |
|
(10,183 |
) |
143 |
|
(10,040 |
) |
|
|
(14,817 |
) |
(24,857 |
) |
||||||
Assets |
|
$ |
21,350 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
21,350 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,927 |
|
$ |
24,277 |
|
The principal GAAP adjustments are the accounting for stock options and cumulative translation adjustments.
The main operations and fixed assets of Medicsight are in the United Kingdom.
10. Stock-based compensation
We have issued stock options from MGT and our principal subsidiary company, Medicsight.
MGT stock option plan
On December 5, 2007 we approved the 2007 MGT stock option plan and granted options for 1,975,000 shares under this plan. At September 30, 2010 there were 475,000 options outstanding and 316,668 of the options issued were exercisable. Options issued under this plan vest in equal one-thirds after employees have been employed for 12, 24 and 36 months from the grant date.
Medicsight stock option plans
We have twelve Stock Option Plans in Medicsight, whose shares were listed on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange on September 21, 2007.
Plan A - on February 26, 2003 we approved stock option plan A and in the three month period ended March 31, 2003 we granted options for 2,971,000 shares under this plan. At September 30, 2010 there were no options outstanding.
Plan B - on August 15, 2005 we approved stock option plan B and between July 1, 2003 and March 31, 2005 we granted options for 3,420,500 shares under this plan. At September 30, 2010 there were 150,000 options outstanding, all of which were exercisable.
Plan C - on August 15, 2005 we approved stock option plan C and between April 1, 2005 and June 30, 2006 we granted options for 515,000 shares under this plan. Options issued under this plan vest in equal one-thirds after employees have been employed for 12, 24 and 36 months from the grant date. At September 30, 2010 there were 85,000 options outstanding, all of which were exercisable.
Plan D - On July 13, 2006 we approved stock option plan D and granted options for 1,375,000 shares under this plan. Options under this plan vest in equal one-thirds after employees have been employed for 12, 24 and 36 months from the grant date. At September 30, 2010 there were no options outstanding.
Plan E - on February 22, 2007 we approved and granted options for 5,900,000 shares under stock option plan E. Options under this plan vest in equal one-thirds after employees have been employed for 12, 24 and 36 months from the grant date. At September 30, 2010 there were 790,000 options outstanding, all of which were exercisable.
Plan F - on May 16, 2007 we approved and subsequently granted options for 350,000 shares under stock option plan F. Options under this plan vest in equal one-thirds after employees have been employed for 12, 24 and 36 months from the grant date. At September 30, 2010 there were 50,000 options outstanding, all of which were exercisable.
Plan G - on December 18, 2007 we approved and subsequently granted options for 3,025,000 shares under stock option plan G. Options under this plan vest in equal one-thirds after employees have been employed for 12, 24 and 36 months from the grant date. At September 30, 2010 there were 150,000 options outstanding, 100,000 of which were exercisable.
Plan H - on June 2, 2008 we approved and subsequently granted options for 750,000 shares under stock option plan H. Options under this plan vest in equal one thirds after employees have been employed for 12, 24 and 36 months from the grant date. At September 30, 2010 there were no options outstanding.
Plan I - on December 16, 2008 we approved and subsequently granted options for 1,805,000 shares under stock option plan I. Options under this plan vest in equal one thirds after employees have been employed for 12, 24 and 36 months from the grant date. At September 30, 2010 108,333 options were outstanding, 41,666 of which were exercisable.
Plan J - on May 14, 2009 we approved and subsequently granted options for 7,848,750 shares under stock option plan J. Options under this plan vest in equal one sixths after employees have been employed for 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months from the grant date. At September 30, 2010 there were 6,838,560 options outstanding, 2,406,251 of which were exercisable.
Plan K - on May 20, 2009 we approved and subsequently granted options for 300,000 shares under stock option plan K. Options under this plan vest in equal one thirds on June 30, 2009, September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009. At September 30, 2010 there were 300,000 options outstanding, all of which were exercisable.
Plan L - on January 26, 2010 we approved and subsequently granted options for 100,000 shares under stock option plan L. Options under this plan vest in equal one sixths after employees have been employed for 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months from the grant date. At September 30, 2010 there were 100,000 options outstanding, 16,667 of which were exercisable.
Medicexchange stock option plans
Until March 31, 2010 we had two stock option plans in Medicexchange. As Medicexchange was divested at this date these plans are no longer part of MGT Capital investments Inc.
The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model used in the calculation of grant date fair value for the above options are highly subjective and can materially affect the resulting valuation. These assumptions are based on multiple factors including United Kingdom treasury bonds for the risk-free rate at the time of grant, expected future exercising patterns (we cannot base the estimate on the historical exercise patterns as no options have been exercised) and the volatility of the MGT stock price.
The following assumptions were used to estimate fair value:
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
0 |
% |
0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
88 |
% |
105 |
% |
Risk-free rate |
|
3.96 |
% |
3.89 |
% |
Expected life of options |
|
5.9 years |
|
6.75 years |
|
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted- |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted- |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
11,503,359 |
|
£ |
0.58 |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
4,605,890 |
|
£ |
0.94 |
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Granted |
|
100,000 |
|
£ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Forfeited |
|
(2,156,466 |
) |
£ |
1.83 |
|
$ |
2.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Transferred with sale of Medicexchange |
|
(400,000 |
) |
£ |
0.63 |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
|
9,046,893 |
|
£ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
4,256,252 |
|
£ |
0.42 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
The following is a summary of the status of the stock options outstanding at September 30, 2010:
|
|
Outstanding options |
|
Exercisable options |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Number |
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
Number |
|
Average exercise |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
MGT Capital Investments, Inc. 2007 Plan |
|
475,000 |
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
3.69 |
|
316,668 |
|
|
|
$ |
3.69 |
|
||
Medicsight Plan A |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
£ |
0.75 |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
|
£ |
0.75 |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
Medicsight Plan B |
|
150,000 |
|
3.9 |
|
£ |
0.75 |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
150,000 |
|
£ |
0.75 |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
Medicsight Plan C |
|
85,000 |
|
5.3 |
|
£ |
0.75 |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
85,000 |
|
£ |
0.75 |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
Medicsight Plan D |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
£ |
0.83 |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
|
£ |
0.83 |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
Medicsight Plan E |
|
790,000 |
|
6.4 |
|
£ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
790,000 |
|
£ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
Medicsight Plan F |
|
50,000 |
|
6.7 |
|
£ |
0.75 |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
50,000 |
|
£ |
0.75 |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
Medicsight Plan G |
|
150,000 |
|
7.2 |
|
£ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
100,000 |
|
£ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
Medicsight Plan H |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
£ |
0.69 |
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
|
£ |
0.69 |
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
Medicsight Plan I |
|
108,333 |
|
8.3 |
|
£ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
41,666 |
|
£ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
Medicsight Plan J |
|
6,838,560 |
|
8.6 |
|
£ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
2,406,251 |
|
£ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Medicsight Plan K |
|
300,000 |
|
8.6 |
|
£ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
300,000 |
|
£ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Medicsight Plan L |
|
100,000 |
|
9.2 |
|
£ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
16,667 |
|
£ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
On May 14, 2009 we approved Medicsight Plan J. Employees who were employed on May 14, 2009 were given the opportunity to forfeit all their existing options in Plans A through I and, in their place, receive in Plan J 50% of the number of forfeited options. We accounted for this as a modification of the existing options, specifically a cancel and reissue. Of the options issued in Plan J 3,032,500 were issued as new options and 4,816,250 were issued as replacements for options cancelled in existing plans. The modification charge for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $2. In the nine months ended September 30, 2009 it was $9.
We recorded the following amounts related to stock-based expenses in the Statement of Operations for the following periods:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
(360 |
) |
$ |
470 |
|
$ |
470 |
|
$ |
1,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Research and development |
|
10 |
|
14 |
|
45 |
|
78 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
14 |
|
11 |
|
22 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
(350 |
) |
$ |
498 |
|
$ |
526 |
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
Of the $526 and $(350) stock-based expense, in the nine and three months ended September 30, 2010 respectively, $261 and $(76) correspondingly was allocated to the non-controlling interest. The credit in the 3 months ended September 30, 2010 is a result of Tim Paterson-Brown and Allan Rowley forfeiting their MGT Capital Investments Inc. stock options (See note 12). 1,500,000 options were forfeited in total; of these, 1,000,000 options had already vested. The charge for the remaining 500,000 was reversed and amount to $751.
No compensation costs were capitalized.
The aggregate intrinsic value for options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2010 was $nil.
A summary of non-vested options at September 30, 2010 and the change during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is presented below:
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted Average |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-vested at January 1, 2010 |
|
6,897,469 |
|
£ |
0.31 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
Granted |
|
100,000 |
|
£ |
0.04 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Vested |
|
(1,450,996 |
) |
£ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(755,832 |
) |
£ |
0.81 |
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2010 |
|
4,790,641 |
|
£ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
At September 30, 2010 there was $1,403 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the option plans. Non-vested awards are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.64 years.
11. Non-controlling interest
The Company has non-controlling investors in Medicsight and, prior to its disposal, in Medicexchange as follows:
|
|
Medicsight |
|
Discontinued |
|
Total |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Non-controlling interest at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
11,150 |
|
$ |
254 |
|
$ |
11,404 |
|
Non-controlling share of (losses) |
|
(2,625 |
) |
(14 |
) |
(2,639 |
) |
|||
Non-controlling share of stock-based expense |
|
258 |
|
3 |
|
261 |
|
|||
Non-controlling share of other comprehensive (loss) |
|
(110 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(120 |
) |
|||
Disposal of Medicexchange |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
(233 |
) |
|||
Non-controlling interest at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
8,673 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
8,673 |
|
12. Related Party Transactions
Accsys Technologies
Tim Paterson-Brown, our Chief Executive Officer, was a non-executive director of Accsys Technologies plc, but resigned from this position on April 6, 2010. Accsys Technologies plc has a subsidiary company Titan Wood Limited, which rents space in 66 Hammersmith Road. In the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively, £89 ($140) and £117 ($194) of office related costs were recharged to Titan Wood Limited. At September 30, 2010 there was a balance receivable from Titan Wood Limited of £43 ($68) of which £43 ($68) remains unpaid as of October 30, 2010. This is payable within 30 days under the terms of the invoice.
Moneygate Group
In Fiscal 2009 we purchased 49% of the share capital of Moneygate Group Limited (Moneygate). Moneygate is a related party as we have significant influence over it and have representation on the board of directors. On acquisition we provided loan facilities of £250 ($395) for working capital and £2,000 ($3,162) for acquisitions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 we allowed a portion of the acquisition facility to be used for working capital as acquisitions have been delayed.
On, August 3, 2010 Moneygate agreed to convert all monies advanced to date £1,247 ($1,888) and future monies up to £2,000 ($3,162) in total in to convertible loan notes. On August 3, 2010 MGT Capital Investments Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales (MGT UK), and a wholly owned subsidiary of MGT Capital Investments, Inc., entered into an agreement with an unrelated third party for the sale of its Moneygate convertible loan note of £2,000 ($3,162).
Under the terms of the its agreement with Moneygate, the Company advanced additional working capital funding. At September 30, 2010, £900 ($1,423) had been advanced for working capital and £410 ($648) for acquisitions. In October 2010, additional funding was advanced to Moneygate and as at October 31, 2010 £1,025 ($1,620) had been advanced for working capital and £460 ($727) for acquisitions.
Under the terms of the convertible note sale discussed above these additional funds would have been sold as part of the convertible loan sale.
On November 18, 2010, the previously executed agreement to sell the Moneygate convertible loan notes of up to £2,000 ($3,162) to a third party was terminated. Concurrent with the termination the Company amended its convertible loan with Moneygate to remove the convertible feature and fix its amount repayable at £1,485 ($2,305) with no future advances. The amended loan agreement is repayable on or before 2 years after the effective date. The loan will accrue 5% interest per annum and is secured by a debenture over the assets of Moneygate.
The Company engaged an outside valuation firm to perform a valuation on the Companys investment and loan note receivable from Moneygate. This report concluded that on the scenario of Moneygate being unsuccessful in raising adequate finance then the value of the Companys loan note receivable from Moneygate was £199 ($315). On this basis we have impaired the carrying value of the loan notes receivable to this amount.
Dunamis
Allan Rowley, Chief Financial Officer of MGT Capital investments Inc. and Chief Executive Officer of Medicsight, along with David Sumner, the Chairman of Medicsight, are both directors of Dunamis Capital. Dunamis Capital (www.dunamis-capital.com) is a United Arab Emirates (UAE) registered company regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). Dunamis Capital is provider of global investment banking and private wealth management services to the small and mid-cap enterprises sector and related investment community. Dunamis focuses on the emerging markets spanning the Middle East, North African and South Asian region (Menasa), sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Dunamiss head office is located in the UAE, with additional presence in the UK and China. Dunamis is 100% owned by David Sumner and was set up by David with Allan Rowleys financial consulting assistance as a corporate financing and advisory firm to the Middle East and North African region. On September 6, 2010, Medicsight made a short term loan of $1,100 (£696) to Dunamis Capital which is to be repaid by December 31, 2010, along with $36 (£23) of interest. As of September 30, 2010 interest of $7 (£5) has been accrued. The funds were lent to Dunamis in order to achieve a higher rate of interest than we would have on deposit with a financial institution and also to demonstrate Medicsights financial ability to co-invest with a joint venture in the region using one of its UAE subsidiaries. Dunamis Capital has provided the assets of the business as collateral against the loan made by Medicsight.
D4D Limited
Effective July 6, 2010, the Company entered into a service agreement with D4D Limited (a Company that offers Executive Services for small and mid-cap companies). D4D is owned by Tim Paterson-Brown and Allan Rowley, and pursuant to the agreement, D4D provides the services of Tim Paterson-Brown (as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) and Allan Rowley (as Chief Financial Officer) to the Company on similar remuneration to the previous employment contracts. D4D also provides services to other companies.
On executing the contract with D4D Limited on July 6, 2010 Tim Paterson-Brown and Allan Rowley terminated their employment contracts with the Company and forfeited their stock options in MGT Capital investments Inc., but still hold the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer respectively. In the three months ending September 30, 2010, MGT Capital Investments paid D4D Limited £110 ($174) in relation to the above service agreement.
13. Commitments
Lease Commitments and Security Deposit
On August 25, 2006 we executed a 10-year agreement with Pirbright Holdings Limited, to lease 8,787 square feet of office space at the Kensington Centre, 66 Hammersmith Road, London W14 8UD, United Kingdom. Under this lease agreement our UK property rent, services and related costs are approximately £330 ($522) per annum, paid quarterly in advance. We have the right to terminate this agreement on the expiry of the fifth year of the lease at the option of the company. Our annual rent is subject to upward only review on August 24, 2011.
We have two 10-month rent-free periods: the first commencing August 25, 2006; the second commencing August 25, 2011. We have accounted for this lease as an operating lease and have accounted for the lease rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
We also have a satellite office in Tokyo, Japan, with a two-year rental agreement that began in March 2010.
The following is a schedule of the future minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancellable terms in excess of one year:
Year ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2010 (remaining three months) |
|
$ |
126 |
|
2011 |
|
325 |
|
|
2012 |
|
25 |
|
|
2013 |
|
2 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
Later years |
|
|
|
|
Total minimum |
|
$ |
478 |
|
The total lease rental expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was £364 ($575) compared to £390 ($601) at September 30, 2009.
Other commitments
In July 2008 we entered into an agreement with a partner to develop interfaces for our software. We have committed to pay Euros 1,445 ($1,967) over an expected thirty-six month period. As at September 30, 2010 we have paid Euros 845 ($1,150). These payments will be recovered against future royalty payments, should the products be successfully commercialized. These payments have been expensed to the income statement and classified as research and development. In August 2010 the agreement was varied to include certain triggers to be achieved before moving onto the next stage of development.
14. Subsequent Events
On November 19, 2010 MGT Capital Investments, Inc., announced that it has approved the following. The Company has entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Laddcap Value Partners III LP (Laddcap). Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Laddcap has agreed to purchase 6,500,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company for $1,300,000 or $0.20 per share payable on meeting of the closing conditions. The Common Stock that Laddcap is purchasing will constitute approximately 16.7% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock of the Company. In addition, Laddcap will receive a five year warrant to purchase an additional 6,500,000 shares of the company at an exercise price of $0.20 per share. The closing of the Laddcap transaction is subject to regulatory approval.
Effective November 19, 2010, the Company amended its agreement with D4D Limited. The amendment confirms the commitments of MGT Capital Investments post closing of the Laddcap Value Partners III LLC stock purchases agreement.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The terms MGT, the Company, we, our and us refer to MGT Capital Investments, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as a consolidated entity, unless the context suggests otherwise.
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements may be identified by the use of words such as anticipate, estimates, should, expect, guidance, project, intend, plan, believe and other words and terms of similar meaning, in connection with any discussion of our financial statements, business, results of operations, liquidity and future operating or financial performance. Please also refer to our Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements at the front of this Form.
Executive summary
On November 19, 2010 MGT Capital Investments, Inc., announced that it has approved the following. The Company has entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Laddcap Value Partners III LP (Laddcap). Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Laddcap has agreed to purchase 6,500,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company for $1,300,000 or $0.20 per share. The Common Stock that Laddcap is purchasing will constitute approximately 16.7% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock of the Company. In addition, Laddcap will receive a five year warrant to purchase an additional 6,500,000 shares of the company at an exercise price of $0.20 per share. The closing of the Laddcap transaction is subject to regulatory approval.
As of March 31, 2010, following a detailed strategic review we reduced our on-going operating cost base and disposed of our investments in Medicexchange, XShares, Hipcricket and Eurindia. We continue to hold 49% of the equity in Moneygate and following a deed of release for the convertible loan note sale has consolidated our loan position with a new agreement. No further funds will be advanced to Moneygate. In the short term, we will primarily be focusing our cash and resources on our investment holding in Medicsight plc. Medicexchanges results have been classified as discontinued operations.
The Company achieved the following results in the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
· Revenue from license and other sales was $388 compared to $146 in 2009. Gross profit on revenues was $273 compared with $146 in 2009.
· other operating expenses, excluding the 2009 impairment of goodwill, decreased 39% to $7,862 compared to $12,846 in 2009.
· Net loss attributable to MGT Capital Investments, Inc. decreased 69 % to $6,852 and resulted in a loss per share from continuing operations of $0.20 compared to a net loss of $21,770 and net loss per share from continuing operations of $0.64 in 2009.
Revenue remains limited as we await regulatory approvals in what we consider to be our key markets of the USA and Japan. With regards to regulatory approvals for ColonCAD, we received a second request for Additional Information (AI) from the FDA in January 2010. After working closely with the clinical, statistical and legal advisors, the Company sent a comprehensive response to the FDA on June 2, 2010. We are currently awaiting feedback from the FDA on the status of the application. We also await a further update from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) regulatory authorities in Japan.
Operating costs, excluding the goodwill impairment that impacted the consolidated statement of operations in the first quarter of Fiscal 2009, have decreased by 39%. This was predominantly due to two headcount reductions that Medicsight took in Fiscal 2009, the impact of which is being fully felt in the first nine months of Fiscal 2010. Together with reduced staff costs, a focus on reducing other expenses has reduced our discretionary spending.
Our investment in Moneygate is accounted for by the equity method, and is currently generating net losses. The investment has been reduced to £199 ($315).
Net loss from Medicexchange amounted to $234, which is accounted for in discontinued operations together with a gain on sale of $149, and will not occur in the future.
The significant reduction in net loss was due to the impairment of $12,157 of goodwill relating to Medicsight in the first quarter of Fiscal 2009.
We have cash and cash equivalents of $10,569 compared to $22,165 as of December 31, 2009. The decrease is mainly attributable to cash used in operating activities ($7,530) and loans ($2,572) to related parties.
On September 6, 2010, Medicsight made a short term loan of $1,100 (£696) to Dunamis Capital which is to be repaid by December 31, 2010, along with $36 (£23) of interest. As of September 30, 2010 interest of $7 (£5) has been accrued. The funds were lent to Dunamis in order to achieve a higher rate of interest than we would have on deposit with a financial institution and also to demonstrate Medicsights financial ability to co-invest with a joint venture in the region using one of its UAE subsidiaries. Dunamis is 100% owned by David Sumner and was set up by David with Allan Rowleys financial assistance as a corporate financing and advisory firm to the Middle East and North African region. David Sumner is the Chairman of Medicsight and Allan Rowley is the Chief Financial Officer of MGT Capital Investments Inc. and Chief Executive Officer of Medicsight.
The Company engaged an outside valuation firm to perform a valuation on the Companys investment and loan note receivable from Moneygate. This report concluded that on the scenario of Moneygate being unsuccessful in raising adequate finance then the value of the Companys loan note receivable from Moneygate was £199 ($315). On this basis we have impaired the carrying value of the loan notes receivable to this amount.
Critical accounting policies and estimates
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report describe our significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We continually evaluate our critical accounting policies and estimates.
We believe the critical accounting policies listed below reflect significant judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Medicsight
We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue realized or realizable and earned when we have persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been shipped or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is probable.
Software License fee revenue is derived from the licensing of computer software. Maintenance revenue is derived from software maintenance. Our software licenses are generally sold as part of an arrangement that includes maintenance and support.
We license software and sell maintenance through visualization solution partners and original equipment manufacturers. We receive regular sales reporting detailing the number of licenses sold by original equipment manufacturers, value-added resellers and independent distributors (collectively, Resellers) to end users. We generally offer terms that require payment 30 days from invoicing.
Provided the Reseller i) assumes all risk of the purchase, ii) has the ability and obligation to pay regardless of receiving payment from the end user, and all other revenue recognition criteria are met, license revenue from Resellers is recognized upon shipment of its product to vendors (sell-in basis).
Revenue from license fees is recognized when notification of shipment to the end user has occurred, there are no significant Company obligations with regard to implementation and the Companys services are not considered essential to the functionality of other elements of the arrangement.
Services Revenue from maintenance and support arrangements is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance and support arrangements.
Multiple-element arrangements we enter into arrangements with Resellers that include a combination of software products, maintenance and support. For such arrangements, we recognize revenue using the residual method. We allocate the total arrangement fee among the various elements of the arrangement based on the fair value of each of the undelivered elements determined by vendor-specific objective evidence. The fair value of maintenance and support services is evidence of fair value for all elements, and revenue is deferred until the earlier of when vendor-specific objective evidence is determined for the undelivered elements (residual method) or when all elements for which we do not have vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value have been delivered.
Hardware Revenue is derived from the sale of our MedicCO2LON product. This product is an automated CO2 insufflation device, and is generally sold as part of an arrangement that includes a one year warranty. The risk of incurring warranty related expense is mitigated by the warranty contractually agreed with the supplier. The company will review the risk of warranty liabilities on a regular basis, and will make any and all appropriate provisions accordingly. At the present time, the company feels that the warranty liability is insignificant and has therefore not made any provision.
MedicCO2LON is sold exclusively through our distribution partner MEDRAD Inc. Revenue is recognized as goods and orders are satisfied and goods are delivered to our distribution partner. We generally offer terms which require payments within 45 days from invoicing.
Equity-based compensation
We recognize compensation expense for all equity-based payments. Under fair value recognition provisions, we recognize equity-based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognize compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the development of assumptions that are input into the model. These assumptions are the expected stock volatility, the risk-free interest rate, the options expected life and the dividend yield on the underlying stock. Expected volatility is calculated based on the historical volatility of our common stock over the expected option life and other appropriate factors. Risk-free interest rates are calculated based on continuously compounded risk-free rates for the appropriate term. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero as we have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on historical experience.
Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of equity-based payment awards require the input of the subjective assumptions described above. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity-based payment awards represent managements best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our equity-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. In addition, we are required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense only for those shares expected to vest. If our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, the equity-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what we have recorded in the current period.
Research and development
We incur costs incurred in connection with the development of software products that are intended for sale. Costs incurred prior to technological feasibility being established for the product are expensed as incurred. Technological feasibility is established upon completion of a detail program design or, in its absence, completion of a working model. Thereafter, all software production costs are capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. Capitalized costs are amortized based on current and future revenue for each product with an annual minimum equal to the straight-line amortization over the remaining estimated economic life of the product. Amortization commences when the product is available for general release to customers.
We concluded that capitalizing such expenditures on completion of a working model was inappropriate because we did not incur any material software production costs and therefore have decided to expense all research and development costs. Our research and development costs are comprised of staff, consultancy and other costs expensed on the Medicsight products.
Fair value of financial instruments
On January 1, 2008 the Company adopted certain provisions of FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for financial assets and financial liabilities and on January 1, 2009 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. This
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Applying fair value measurements to our financial instruments requires managements judgment, especially when using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs.
Investments
Investments in various corporations where our investment is less than 20% of issued share capital are accounted for under the cost method. Investments where we hold between 20% and 50% of issued share capital and we have significant influence over the investee are accounted for under the equity method.
Impairment of long-lived assets and long-lived assets to be disposed of
We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Our assessment for impairment of an asset involves estimating the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from use of the asset and its eventual disposition. An impairment loss recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Calculating the estimated fair value of an asset involves significant judgments and a variety of assumptions. Judgments that we make concerning the value of its intangible assets include assessing time and cost involved for development, time to market, and risks of regulatory failure or obsolescence (due to market, environmental or technological advances for example). For calculating fair value based on discounted cash flows, we forecast future operating results and future cash flows, which include long-term forecasts of revenue growth, gross profits and capital expenditures.
Impairment analyses were performed at various points of the year ended December 31, 2009 and the Company decided to fully impair goodwill relating to Medicsight, its investment in XShares (both the equity and the convertible loan notes), and its holding in Eurindia.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In October 2009 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, with regards to multiple-deliverable arrangements. The update is effective for revenue arrangements entered into on or after June 15, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In October 2009 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 985, Software, with regards to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. The update is effective for revenue arrangements entered into on or after June 15, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2009 the FASB issued an update to ASC Topic 810, Consolidations, with regards to improvements to financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities. The adoption of this update has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2010 the FASB issued an update to ASC Topic 605, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, relating to research and development projects. The amendments in the ASU are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In August 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-21, Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules. ASU 2010-21 amends various SEC paragraphs in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification pursuant to SEC Final Rule, Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-21 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-22, Accounting for Various Topics. ASU 2010-22 amends various SEC paragraphs in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification based on external comments received and the issuance of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 112, which amends or rescinds portions of certain SAB topics. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-22 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Results of operations
Parent Holding Company operating results
Operating losses in the parent holding company for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, are $1,995 (2009: $14,817). For the three months ended September 30, 2010 are $78 (2009: $1,188). For the nine months end September 30, 2010, the largest items of operating expense are people costs, $677, legal and professional Fees, $716, and insurance, $157. In the period, $1,711 was provided for in relation to the Moneygate loan. These appear below operating loss in the consolidated statement of operations.
Medicsight operating results
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenue |
|
$ |
388 |
|
$ |
146 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
||
Selling, general and administration costs |
|
(5,040 |
) |
(8,516 |
) |
||
Research and development |
|
(1,100 |
) |
(1,670 |
) |
||
Operating expense |
|
(6,140 |
) |
(10,186 |
) |
||
Stock-based compensation (included in operating expenses) |
|
(581 |
) |
(865 |
) |
||
Operating loss |
|
(5,867 |
) |
(10,040 |
) |
||
Interest and other income (expense) |
|
(5 |
) |
466 |
|
||
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
10,141 |
|
$ |
22,709 |
|
Net assets |
|
11,062 |
|
21,519 |
|
||
In the nine months ended September 30, 2010 sales of our CAD products were flat compared to the comparable period in the prior year. Licenses have been sold in Europe but we have yet to receive approvals in the USA and Japan, which we consider to be our key markets.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2010 Medicsight launched MedicCO2LON, its insufflator product. It also signed an agreement with a global medical devices company to distribute MedicCO2LON. In the nine months ended September 30, 2010, revenue of $215 had been recognized through MedicCO2LON sales. Cost of revenue for the period was $115.
With regards to regulatory approvals we received a second request for Additional Information (AI) from the FDA in January 2010. After working closely with clinical, statistical and legal advisors, the Company sent a comprehensive response to the FDA on June 2, 2010. We are in regular dialogue and continue to work closely with our FDA review team. We also work closely with our reviewers at the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW).
Our operating expenses have reduced from $10,186 in 2009 to $6,140 in 2010. Due to the delays in receiving regulatory approvals in Japan and the USA, Medicsights management made the decision in Fiscal 2009 to reduce headcount and streamline operations, but without jeopardizing longer term research, product development or clinical activities. The effects of these decisions are now being reflected in the statement of operations with a significantly lower cost base.
Research and development is made up of staff, staff related consultancy, stock options and product development software costs expensed on the research and development of Medicsights products. This has decreased compared to the comparative periods in 2009 due to the reduction in headcount.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2010 stock option accounting charges fell as Medicsight employed fewer people than in the same period in the prior year.
Interest and other income reduced as Medicsights cash balances were lower than in 2009 due to cash spent in operations.
Other investments
Moneygate
On October 8, 2009 we invested a nominal sum in Moneygate Group Limited (Moneygate), a UK based Independent Financial Advisor (IFA), and acquired 49% of its share capital. We also provided a £250 ($395) working capital facility and an acquisition facility of £2,000 ($3,162) facility for acquisitions. As of December 31, 2009 the working capital facility had been fully drawn down as had £100 ($158) of the acquisition facility in anticipation of a potential acquisition that eventually did not occur.
Moneygates business plan is predicated on acquisition-based growth in the fragmented UK IFA market, and we have provided it with the capital to expand. In the period ended September 30, 2010, Moneygate has completed the acquisition of a small IFA
company, thus increasing the number of IFAs employed. Its management continues to review a number of further potential acquisitions and hopes to complete these in the near future.
In Q2 2010, Moneygate received a verbal offer for financing from a London based finance house, that would provide Moneygate with next round finance. Based on this verbal offer Moneygate agreed to convert all monies advanced to date £1,247 ($1,888) and future monies up to £2,000 ($3,162) in total in to convertible loan notes. On August 3, 2010 MGT Capital Investments Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales (MGT UK), and a wholly owned subsidiary of MGT Capital Investments, Inc., entered into an agreement with an unrelated third party (who also relied on the verbal assurances of external financing in to Moneygate) for the sale of its Moneygate convertible loan note of £2,000 ($3,162).
Under the terms of the above agreement MGT Capital Investments Limited further advanced working capital funding and as at September 30, 2010, £900 ($1,423) had been advanced for working capital and £410 ($648) for acquisitions. The additional funds would be offset against the staged payments of the £2,000 ($3,162) loan note sale.
In October 2010, additional funding was advanced to Moneygate and as at October 31, 2010 £1,025 ($1,620) had been advanced for working capital and £460 ($727) for acquisitions.
The London finance house was unable to complete its financing with Moneygate. The third party had relied on the assurances from the London finance house, and had the legal opinion that the contract had not completed. In order to avoid the threat of possible legal ramifications and to remove the prospect of the Company continuing to finance Moneygate, on November 18, 2010, the previously executed agreement to sell the Moneygate convertible loan notes of up to £2,000 ($3,162) to a third party was renegotiated. Following deeds of release between MGT Capital Investments Limited and Moneygate; and MGT Capital Investments Limited and the third party; MGT Capital investments Limited extended a loan agreement to Moneygate to fix its amount repayable at £1,485 ($2,305). This loan agreement is repayable on or before 2 years from November 18, 2010. The loan will accrue 5% interest per annum and is secured by a debenture over the assets of Moneygate. No further monies will be advanced to Moneygate.
Moneygate are in the process of a financing, and are at different stages of discussions with a number of potential investors. For the period ended September 30, 2010 the Company impaired the value of the loan receivable to £199 ($315). Should Moneygate be successful in its fund raising, the Company may receive more than the £199 ($315) carrying value amount.
As Moneygate is accounted for by the equity method and is currently generating net losses, Moneygates results are not reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Operations or the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Moneygate is classified as a related party because the Company has representation on its board of directors.
Eurindia Limited
In 2000 MGT invested in Eurindia Limited (Eurindia), a UK company that invested in IT start-up companies. MGT had a 6% holding in Eurindia and accounted for this investment on a cost basis. As of December 31, 2009 this investment had been fully impaired. On March 31, 2010 we disposed of all of our holding in Eurindia for $1.
XShares Group
In 2007 and 2008 we invested $3,000 in Series C preferred shares of XShares Group, Inc. (XShares), an investment advisor that creates, issues and supports exchange traded funds with a particular healthcare specialty. In the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company invested $2,000 in XShares convertible notes with a principal of $2,100. As of December 31, 2009 the equity investment and the convertible notes had been fully impaired. On March 31, 2010 we disposed of all of our equity holdings in XShares for $1 and the convertible notes for $1 resulting in a total gain on sale of $2.
HipCricket Inc.
In Fiscal 2007 we invested $2,000 in HipCricket Inc., a company engaged in mobile marketing. In the year ended December 31, 2009 HipCricket Inc. was delisted from the AIM Market and we accounted for it as an investment held at cost. As of December 31, 2009 the investment was held at a book value of $224. On March 31, 2010 we disposed of all of our holding in HipCricket for $205.
Investment in Medicsight
Our condensed consolidated financial statements include the results and financial condition of our subsidiary, Medicsight. Our holding in Medicsight is 86,000,000 shares out of Medicsights issued share capital of 155,524,504 shares.
As of September 30, 2010 Medicsights share price was £0.04 ($0.07) compared to £0.08 ($0.13), as of December 31, 2009. This valued the holding at £3,655 ($5,778), compared to £6,794 ($10,821) as of December 31, 2009.
Liquidity and capital resources
Working capital information
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Working capital summary |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
10,569 |
|
$ |
22,165 |
|
Current assets |
|
13,116 |
|
23,385 |
|
||
Current liabilities |
|
(1,508 |
) |
(2,244 |
) |
||
Working capital surplus |
|
$ |
11,608 |
|
$ |
21,141 |
|
Ratio of current assets to current liabilities |
|
8.7 |
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Cash flow summary |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash (used for) provided by |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(7,530 |
) |
$ |
(11,250 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
(3,374 |
) |
(1,074 |
) |
||
Discontinued operations operating activities |
|
(226 |
) |
(633 |
) |
||
Effects of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(466 |
) |
1,576 |
|
||
Net cash flow |
|
$ |
(11,596 |
) |
$ |
(11,381 |
) |
Our cash and cash equivalents have decreased during 2010 predominantly because of the $7,530 used in operating activities, and loans ($2,572) issued to related parties. Our net cash used in operating activities differs from net loss predominantly because of various non-cash adjustments such as stock-based compensation and movements in working capital.
Included in investing activities is a further $1,472 advanced to Moneygate, with $1,005 for the working capital facility and $467 for the acquisition facility.
Also included in investing activities is a short term loan made to Dunamis Capital of $1,100 (£696) which will be repaid by December 31, 2010, along with $36 (£23) interest. As of September 30, 2010 interest of $7 (£5) has been accrued. The funds were lent to Dunamis in order to achieve a higher rate of interest than we would have on deposit with a financial institution and also to demonstrate Medicsights financial ability to co-invest with a joint venture in the region using one of its United Arab Emirate (UAE) subsidiaries.
Medicexchange was sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and $1,101 of cash was disposed of as part of this transaction, which is included within investing activities. For consideration of this sale along with other assets sold at the same time MGT was due to receive 4 installments totaling £750 ($1,136). As of September 30, 2010 £250 ($382) had been received. The third payment installment in the original agreement was due on August 30, 2010. At the request of the third party, and in discussion and negotiation with management, it was agreed that the remaining installments would be modified. The revised agreement now includes the following payment installments; October 30, 2010, £75 ($113); December 15, 2010, £175 ($265); and February 28, 2011, £250 ($379).
The October 30, 2010 payment has been received and the next payment is due on December 15, 2010. As compensation for delaying the third installment payment, the last payment will be received one month earlier than in the original agreement.
Our ratio of current assets to current liabilities remains strong at 8.7. This is a result of the $10,569 of cash held in the Company.
Moneygate acquisition facility
Following deeds of release between MGT Capital Investments Limited and Moneygate; and MGT Capital Investments Limited and the third party; MGT Capital investments Limited extended a loan agreement to Moneygate to fix its amount repayable at £1,485 ($2,305). This loan agreement is repayable on or before 2 years after the effective date. The loan will accrue 5% interest per annum and is secured by a debenture over the assets of Moneygate. No further monies will be advanced to Moneygate.
Risks and uncertainties related to our future capital requirements
To date we have primarily financed our operations through private placements of equity securities. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or equity-related securities of the Company or its subsidiaries, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution to our stockholders.
No assurance can be given, however, that we will have access to the capital markets in the future, or that financing will be available on acceptable terms to satisfy our cash requirements to implement our business strategies.
If we are unable to access the capital markets or obtain acceptable financing, our results of operations and financial conditions could be materially and adversely affected. We may be required to raise substantial additional funds through other means.
Our technology has not yet been regulated in all target territories and as a result commercial results have been limited and we have not generated significant revenues. We cannot assure our stockholders that our technology and products will be commercialized successfully, or that if so commercialized, that revenues will be sufficient to fund our operations.
If adequate funds are not available to us, we may be required to curtail operations significantly or to obtain funds through entering into arrangements with collaborative partners or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our technologies or products that we would not otherwise relinquish.
Commitments
On August 25, 2006 we executed a 10-year agreement with Pirbright Holdings Limited, to lease 8,787 square feet of office space at the Kensington Centre, 66 Hammersmith Road, London W14 8UD, United Kingdom.
Under this lease agreement our UK property rent, services and related costs will be approximately £330 ($522) per annum, paid quarterly in advance. We have the right to terminate this agreement on the expiration of the fifth year of the lease. Our annual rent is subject to upward only review on August 24, 2011. We have two 10-month rent-free periods: the first commencing August 25, 2006; the second commencing August 25, 2011.
We have a satellite office in Tokyo (Japan) with a two year rental agreement.
In July 2008 we entered into an agreement with a partner to develop interfaces for our software. We have committed to pay Euros 1,445 ($1,967) over an expected thirty-six month period. As at September 30, 2010 we have paid Euros 845 ($1,150). These payments will be recovered against future royalty payments, should the products be successfully commercialized.
The following table analyzes our contractual obligations.
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
||||||||||
Contractual obligations |
|
Total |
|
Less than 1 year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
||||
Operating lease obligations |
|
$ |
478 |
|
$ |
126 |
|
$ |
350 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
817 |
|
817 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,295 |
|
$ |
943 |
|
$ |
350 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Recent accounting pronouncements
There are no recent accounting pronouncements that have not yet been adopted that the Company believes may have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements
Item 3. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
Interest rate risk
Our exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. We place our investments in a mixture of cash deposits and available-for-sale market securities. A one percent movement in interest rate would result in approximately $106 change in interest income.
We do not have any debt and we do not use derivative financial instruments.
Foreign exchange risk
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to the operation of our international subsidiaries. Our main operating currency is UK sterling. We also have a subsidiary operation in Japan that operates in Yen.
Our operating costs in Fiscal 2010 were predominantly in UK sterling; we do not foresee any change in the remainder of 2010. A ten percent increase or decline in the US dollar exchange rate against all foreign currencies would have created a decrease or increase in our operating costs in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of approximately $795.
At the end of each reporting period, expenses of the subsidiaries are converted into US dollars using the average currency rate in effect for the period and assets and liabilities are converted into US dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the end of the period.
Additionally, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations relating to payments we make to vendors and suppliers using foreign currencies.
We currently do not hedge against this foreign currency risk.
Fluctuations in exchange rates may impact our financial condition and results of operations.
Item 4. Controls and procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report for the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act, as amended, to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
None.
There has been no material change in the risk factors since the filing of our last annual form 10-K
Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds
In the three months ended September 30, 2010 no shares of common stock were issued.
Item 3. Defaults upon senior securities
None.
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved]
Effective July 6, 2010 the Company entered into an agreement with D4D Limited (a Company that offers Executive Services for small and mid-cap companies). D4D is owned by Tim Paterson-Brown and Allan Rowley, and pursuant to the agreement, D4D provides the services of Tim Paterson-Brown (as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) and Allan Rowley (as Chief Financial Officer) to the Company on similar remuneration to the previous contracts. D4D also provides services to other companies.
On executing the Contract with D4D Limited Tim Paterson-Brown and Allan Rowley terminated their employment contracts with the Company and forfeited their stock options in MGT Capital investments Inc., but still hold the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer respectively.
Effective November 19, 2010, the company amended its agreement with D4D Limited. The amendment confirms the commitments of MGT Capital Investments post-closing of the Laddcap Value Partners III LLC stock purchases agreement.
10.1 |
D4D Limited Service Agreement |
10.2 |
D4D Limited Service Agreement Amendment |
31.1 |
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2 |
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.1 |
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2 |
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
MGT Capital Investments, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ TIM PATERSON-BROWN |
|
|
Tim Paterson-Brown |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ ALLAN ROWLEY |
|
|
Allan Rowley |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 22, 2010 |
|
|