MIDDLEBY Corp - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
FORM
10-Q
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
(Mark
One)
x |
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
or
o |
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934
|
Commission
File No. 1-9973
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware
|
36-3352497
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification
No.)
|
|
1400
Toastmaster Drive, Elgin,
Illinois
|
60120
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
Registrant's Telephone No., including Area Code (847) 741-3300 |
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes
ý No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer ý Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o No
ý
As
of
November 3, 2006, there were 7,940,300 shares of the registrant's common stock
outstanding.
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
INDEX
DESCRIPTION |
PAGE
|
||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |||||
Item 1. | Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) | ||||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 |
1
|
||||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 |
2
|
||||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 |
3
|
||||
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
4
|
||||
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
21
|
|||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
31
|
|||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
34
|
|||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | |||||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
35
|
|||
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
35
|
|||
Item 6. | Exhibits |
36
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
Thousands, Except Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Dec.
31, 2005
|
|||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
3,025
|
$
|
3,908
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, net of reserve for
doubtful
accounts of $3,802 and $3,081
|
52,611
|
38,552
|
|||||
Inventories,
net
|
46,507
|
40,989
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
4,673
|
4,513
|
|||||
Prepaid
taxes
|
--
|
3,354
|
|||||
Current
deferred taxes
|
10,013
|
10,319
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
116,829
|
101,635
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net of
accumulated
depreciation of $36,466 and $34,061
|
28,346
|
25,331
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
100,102
|
98,757
|
|||||
Other
intangibles
|
35,767
|
35,498
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
2,418
|
2,697
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
283,462
|
$
|
263,918
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
$
|
16,704
|
$
|
13,780
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
18,749
|
17,576
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
67,463
|
62,689
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
102,916
|
94,045
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
80,525
|
107,815
|
|||||
Long-term
deferred tax liability
|
10,372
|
8,207
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
6,467
|
5,351
|
|||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; nonvoting; 2,000,000
shares authorized; none issued |
--
|
--
|
|||||
Common
stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized;
11,794,344 and 11,751,219 shares issued in 2006 and 2005, respectively |
117
|
117
|
|||||
Restricted
stock
|
--
|
(14,204
|
)
|
||||
Paid-in
capital
|
68,230
|
79,291
|
|||||
Treasury
stock at cost; 3,855,044 and 3,856,344
shares
in 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
(89,650
|
)
|
(89,650
|
)
|
|||
Retained
earnings
|
104,858
|
73,540
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(373
|
)
|
(594
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
83,182
|
48,500
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
283,462
|
$
|
263,918
|
See
accompanying notes
1
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
103,239
|
$
|
80,937
|
$
|
304,837
|
$
|
239,738
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
62,664
|
48,461
|
187,011
|
147,604
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
40,575
|
32,476
|
117,826
|
92,134
|
|||||||||
Selling
expenses
|
10,009
|
8,710
|
30,901
|
25,663
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
9,545
|
7,482
|
30,477
|
21,847
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
21,021
|
16,284
|
56,448
|
44,624
|
|||||||||
Net
interest expense and deferred financing amortization
|
1,618
|
1,579
|
5,445
|
5,063
|
|||||||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
(37
|
)
|
312
|
35
|
47
|
||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
19,440
|
14,393
|
50,968
|
39,514
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
7,263
|
4,765
|
19,650
|
14,569
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
12,177
|
$
|
9,628
|
$
|
31,318
|
$
|
24,945
|
|||||
Net
earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
1.59
|
$
|
1.28
|
$
|
4.11
|
$
|
3.33
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
1.48
|
$
|
1.19
|
$
|
3.79
|
$
|
3.09
|
|||||
Weighted
average number of shares
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
7,645
|
7,516
|
7,629
|
7,499
|
|||||||||
Dilutive
stock options1
|
603
|
594
|
628
|
561
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
8,248
|
8,110
|
8,257
|
8,060
|
1 |
There
were 3,500 anti-dilutive stock options excluded from common stock
equivalents during the three and nine month periods ended September
30,
2006. There were no anti-dilutive stock options in the 2005 comparative
periods.
|
See
accompanying notes
2
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
Thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months
Ended
|
|||||||
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities-
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
31,318
|
$
|
24,945
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to cash
provided by operating activities: |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,643
|
2,597
|
|||||
Deferred
taxes
|
249
|
(1,088
|
)
|
||||
Stock-based
compensation costs
|
3,416
|
2,482
|
|||||
Cash
effects of changes in -
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
(11,972
|
)
|
(8,218
|
)
|
|||
Inventories,
net
|
(3,145
|
)
|
1,761
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
3,186
|
10,632
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
290
|
1,137
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
6,379
|
(3,466
|
)
|
||||
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
33,364
|
30,782
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities-
|
|||||||
Net
additions to property and equipment
|
(1,236
|
)
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of Nu-Vu
|
--
|
(11,450
|
)
|
||||
Acquisition
of Alkar
|
(1,500
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Acquisition
of Houno
|
(4,939
|
)
|
--
|
||||
|
|||||||
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(7,675
|
)
|
(12,535
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities-
|
|||||||
Net
(repayments) proceeds under revolving credit
facilities
|
(16,500
|
)
|
(11,915
|
)
|
|||
(Repayments)
under senior secured bank notes
|
(9,375
|
)
|
(7,500
|
)
|
|||
Net
(repayments) under foreign borrowings
|
--
|
--
|
|||||
(Repayments)
of note agreement
|
(2,145
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Net
proceeds from stock issuances
|
1,284
|
717
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Net
cash (used in) financing activities
|
(26,736
|
)
|
(18,698
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Effect
of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
121
|
(79
|
)
|
||||
|
|||||||
Cash
acquired in acquisition
|
43
|
--
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Changes
in cash and cash equivalents-
|
|||||||
Net
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(883
|
)
|
(530
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
3,908
|
3,803
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of quarter
|
$
|
3,025
|
$
|
3,273
|
|||
|
|||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
4,898
|
$
|
4,530
|
|||
|
|||||||
Income
tax payments
|
$
|
8,557
|
$
|
4,535
|
See
accompanying notes
3
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2006
(Unaudited)
1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
A) Basis
of Presentation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by The Middleby
Corporation (the "company"), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements are unaudited
and
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
such
rules and regulations, although the company believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information not misleading. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes
contained in the company's 2005 Form 10-K.
In
the
opinion of management, the financial statements contain all adjustments
necessary to present fairly the financial position of the company as of
September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the results of operations for
the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 and cash
flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005.
B) Stock-Based
Compensation
The
company maintains a 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), as amended on May
11, 2005, under which the company's Board of Directors issues stock grants
and
stock options to key employees. A maximum amount of 1,750,000 shares can be
issued under the Plan. As of September 30, 2006, a total of 1,231,160 stock
options and 350,000 restricted stock grants have been issued under the Plan.
In
addition to shares under the Plan, certain directors of the company have
outstanding stock options.
Effective
January 1, 2006, the company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 123(R): "Share Based Payments", which requires the recognition
of
compensation expense associated with stock options and awards based upon their
values. The company elected to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified
prospective method. The company had previously disclosed that it would adopt
the
modified retrospective method. However, upon further review, the modified
prospective method was adopted. Under that method, compensation cost recognized
in the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 includes a ratable portion
of
compensation cost for all share-based payments not yet vested as of January
1,
2006, and a ratable portion of compensation cost for all share-based payments
granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based upon the grant date fair
value.
4
Stock
Grants:
Stock
grants issued are issued under the Plan to key employees and are transferable
upon certain vesting requirements being met. As of the third quarter ended
September 30, 2006, a total of 350,000 restricted stock grants were issued,
280,000 of which were unvested. There were no stock grants issued, forfeited
or
vested during the three month period ended September 30, 2006. The company
recorded compensation expense associated with the restricted stock grants
amounting to $0.9 million and $2.6 million for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2006, respectively and $0.8 million and $2.5 million for
the
three months and nine months ended end October 1, 2005,
respectively.
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, the company elected to follow APB Opinion No. 25: "Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25") in accounting for stock-based
awards to employees and directors. In accordance with APB No. 25, the company
established the value of restricted stock grants based upon the market value
of
the stock at the time of issuance. The value of the stock grant was amortized
and recorded as compensation expense over the applicable vesting period. The
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) did not affect the value assigned to the stock
grants or the amount of the reported compensation expense. Under APB No. 25,
the
value of the restricted stock grant was reflected as a separate component
reducing stockholders' equity with an offsetting increase to Paid-in Capital.
Accordingly, as of December 31, 2005, the unamortized value of the restricted
stock grant was reflected as a separate component in Stockholders' Equity.
Upon
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the company has reclassified $11.6 million related
to the unamortized restricted stock grant to
Paid-in-Capital.
Stock
Options:
Stock
options issued under the Plan provide key employees with rights to purchase
shares of common stock at specified exercise prices. Options may be exercised
upon certain vesting requirements being met, but expire to the extent
unexercised within a maximum of ten years from the date of grant.
5
As
a
result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the company recorded compensation
expense of $238,000 and $843,000, respectively, for the three month and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2006 associated with the ratable portion
of
the stock options granted prior to the adoption date which had not yet vested.
Prior to January 1, 2006, in accordance with APB No. 25, the company had not
recorded compensation expense related to issued stock options in the financial
statements because the exercise price of the stock options was equal to or
greater than the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant.
The
company’s pro forma net earnings and per share data utilizing a fair value based
method for the three month and nine month periods ended October 1, 2005 prior
to
the adoption of SFAS 123(R) is as follows (in thousands, except per share
data):
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||
Oct.
1, 2005
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
|||||||||
Net
income - as reported
|
9,628
|
$
|
24,945
|
|||||||
Less:
Stock-based employee
|
||||||||||
compensation
expense, net
|
||||||||||
of
taxes
|
(184
|
)
|
(500
|
)
|
||||||
Net
income - pro forma
|
$
|
9,444
|
$
|
24,445
|
||||||
Earnings
per share - as reported:
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
1.28
|
$
|
3.33
|
||||||
Diluted
|
1.19
|
3.09
|
||||||||
Earnings
per share - pro forma:
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
1.26
|
$
|
3.26
|
||||||
Diluted
|
1.16
|
3.03
|
The
company has utilized Black-Scholes and binomial option valuation models to
estimate the fair value of issued stock options. During the second quarter
of
2006, 3,500 stock options were issued to company directors at an exercise price
of $88.43 per share. The fair value of these options was estimated using the
Black-Scholes valuation model utilizing the following assumptions: volatility
40%; interest rate 5.03%; and expected life of 4.6 years. The Black-Scholes
and
binomial option valuation models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the
company’s options have characteristics significantly different from those of
traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate, in the opinion of management, the
existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the
fair
value of its options.
6
A
summary
of stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is
presented below:
Stock Option Activity |
Employees
|
Directors
|
Option
Price Per Share |
||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2005:
|
736,025
|
6,000
|
|
||||||||
Granted
|
--
|
3,500
|
$
88.43
|
||||||||
Exercised
|
(40,125
|
)
|
(3,000
|
)
|
$5.90
to
$18.47
|
||||||
Forfeited
|
--
|
--
|
|
||||||||
Outstanding
at September
30, 2006:
|
695,900
|
6,500
|
|
||||||||
Weighted
average price
|
$
|
19.44
|
$
|
52.47
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||||||
Exercisable
at September
30, 2006:
|
556,140
|
6,500
|
|
||||||||
Weighted
average price
|
$
|
16.14
|
$
|
52.47
|
|
The
weighted average price of shares exercised during the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 was $14.96.
The
following summarizes the options outstanding and exercisable for the employee
and director stock plans by exercise price, at September 30, 2006:
Exercise Price |
Options
Outstanding |
Weighted
Average Remaining Life |
Options
Exercisable |
Weighted
Average Remaining Life |
|||||||||
Employee
plan
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
$5.90
|
184,000
|
5.41
|
147,200
|
5.41
|
|||||||||
$10.51
|
69,900
|
41,940
|
6.43
|
||||||||||
$18.47
|
342,000
|
7.07
|
342,000
|
7.07
|
|||||||||
$53.93
|
100,000
|
8.42
|
25,000
|
8.42
|
|||||||||
|
695,900
|
6.76
|
556,140
|
6.64
|
|||||||||
Director
plan
|
|||||||||||||
$10.51
|
3,000
|
1.43
|
3,000
|
1.43
|
|||||||||
$88.43
|
3,500
|
9.62
|
3,500
|
9.62
|
|||||||||
|
6,500
|
5.84
|
6,500
|
5.84
|
7
2) Purchase
Accounting
Nu-Vu
On
January 7, 2005, Middleby Marshall Holdings, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary
of
the company, completed its acquisition of the assets of Nu-Vu Foodservice
Systems ("Nu-Vu"), a leading manufacturer of baking ovens, from Win-Holt
Equipment Corporation ("Win-Holt") for $12.0 million in cash. In September
2005,
the company reached final settlement with Win-Holt on post-closing adjustments
pertaining to the acquisition of Nu-Vu. As a result, the final purchase price
was reduced by $550,000.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed was been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements.
The
allocation of cash paid for the Nu-Vu acquisition is summarized as follows
(in
thousands):
Jan.
7, 2005
|
Adjustments
|
Dec.
31, 2005
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
2,556
|
242
|
$
|
2,798
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
1,178
|
--
|
1,178
|
|||||||
Deferred
taxes
|
3,637
|
(336
|
)
|
3,301
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
4,566
|
252
|
4,818
|
|||||||
Other
intangibles
|
2,188
|
(875
|
)
|
1,313
|
||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(2,125
|
)
|
167
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
12,000
|
$
|
(550
|
)
|
$
|
11,450
|
The
goodwill and other intangible assets associated with the Nu-Vu acquisition,
which are comprised of the tradename, are subject to the non-amortization
provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, and are
allocable to the company's Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for purposes
of segment reporting (see footnote 12 for further discussion). Goodwill and
other intangible assets associated with this transaction are deductible for
income taxes.
Alkar
On
December 7, 2005, the company acquired the stock of Alkar Holdings, Inc.
("Alkar") for $26.7 million in cash. Cash paid at closing amounted to $28.2
million and included $1.5 million of estimated working capital adjustments
determined at closing. In April 2006, the company reached final settlement
on
post-close working capital adjustments, which resulted in an additional payment
of $1.5 million.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon the
results of further evaluation.
8
The
allocation of cash paid for the Alkar acquisition is summarized as follows
(in
thousands):
Dec.
7, 2005
|
Adjustments
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
17,160
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
$
|
17,085
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
3,032
|
--
|
3,032
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
19,177
|
75
|
19,252
|
|||||||
Other
intangibles
|
7,960
|
--
|
7,960
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(16,003
|
)
|
1,500
|
(14,503
|
)
|
|||||
Long-term
deferred tax liability
|
(3,131
|
)
|
--
|
(3,131
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
28,195
|
$
|
1,500
|
$
|
29,695
|
The
goodwill and $5.0 million of trademarks included in other intangibles are
subject to the nonamortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 from the date of
acquisition. Other intangibles also includes $2.1 million allocated to customer
relationships, $0.6 million allocated to backlog, and $0.3 million allocated
to
developed technology which are amortized over periods of 10 years, 7 months,
and
14 years respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Alkar are allocated
to
the Industrial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes.
These
assets are not deductible for tax purposes.
Houno
On
August
31, 2006, the company acquired the stock of Houno A/S (“Houno”) located in
Denmark for $4.9 million in cash. The company also assumed $3.7 million of
debt
included as part of the net assets of Houno.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon the
results of further evaluation.
The
allocation of cash paid for the Houno acquisition is summarized as follows
(in
thousands):
Aug.
31, 2006
|
||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
4,325
|
||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
4,371
|
|||
Goodwill
|
1,287
|
|||
Other
intangibles
|
1,139
|
|||
Other
assets
|
15
|
|||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,061
|
)
|
||
Long-term
debt
|
(2,858
|
)
|
||
Long-term
deferred tax liability
|
(356
|
)
|
||
Other
comprehensive income
|
77
|
|||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
4,939
|
The
goodwill is subject to the nonamortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 from
the
date of acquisition. Other intangibles also includes $0.1 million allocated
to
backlog and $1.0 million allocated to developed technology which are amortized
over periods of 1 month and 5 years, respectively. Goodwill and other
intangibles of Houno are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group
for segment reporting purposes. These assets are not deductible for tax
purposes.
9
3)
|
Litigation
Matters
|
From
time
to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The
company maintains insurance to cover product liability, workers compensation,
property and casualty, and general liability matters. The company is
required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these
matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of
the amount of accrual required, if any, for these contingencies is made after
assessment of each matter and the related insurance coverage. The required
accrual may change in the future due to new developments or changes in approach
such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters. The
company does not believe that any such matter will have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the
company.
4)
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In
November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs - an amendment
of
ARB No. 43, Chapter 4". This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4 to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material. This statement requires
that these items be recognized as current period costs and also requires that
allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based
on
the normal capacity of the production facilities. This statement is effective
for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the company's
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
May
2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
-
a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3". This statement
replaces ABP Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes and FASB Statement No. 3,
Reporting Changes in Interim Financial Statements and changes the requirements
for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principles.
This
statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles. This
statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made
in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The company will apply this
guidance prospectively.
In
February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140". This
statement provides entities with relief from having to separately determine
the
fair value of an embedded derivative that would otherwise be required to be
bifurcated from its host contract in accordance with SFAS No. 133. This
statement allows an entity to make an irrevocable election to measure such
a
hybrid financial instrument at fair value in its entirety, with changes in
fair
value recognized in earnings. This statement is effective for all financial
instruments acquired, issued, or subject to a remeasurement (new basis) event
occurring after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins
after
September 15, 2006. The company will apply this guidance prospectively. The
company is continuing its process of determining what impact the application
of
this guidance will have on the company's financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
10
In
July
2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes.” This interpretation requires that a recorded tax benefit must be
more likely than not of being sustained upon examination by tax authorities
based upon its technical merits. The amount of benefit recorded is the largest
amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized
upon
ultimate settlement. Upon adoption, any adjustment will be recorded directly
to
beginning retained earnings. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The company has not yet determined what
impact the application of the interpretation will have on the company’s
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value
measurements. This statement is effective for interim reporting periods in
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company will apply this
guidance prospectively.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”. This statement improves financial reporting by
requiring an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of
a
defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset of liability in its statement
of
financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year
in
which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity.
This
statement also improves financial reporting by requiring an employer to measure
the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of
financial position, with limited exceptions. Employers with publicly traded
equity securities are required to initially recognize the funded status of
a
defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures
as
of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The company has
not yet determined what impact the application of the interpretation will have
on the company’s financial position.
5) Other
Comprehensive Income
The
company reports changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from
investment by owners and distribution to owners, in accordance with SFAS No.
130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income."
Components
of other comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
12,177
|
$
|
9,628
|
$
|
31,318
|
$
|
24,945
|
|||||
Cumulative
translation adjustment
|
90
|
72
|
354
|
(611
|
)
|
||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on interest
rate swap |
(344
|
)
|
318
|
(134
|
)
|
590
|
|||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
11,923
|
$
|
10,018
|
$
|
31,538
|
$
|
24,924
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss is comprised of minimum pension liability of $(1.2)
million, net of taxes of $(0.8) million, as of September 30, 2006 and December
31, 2005, foreign currency translation adjustments of $0.3 million as of
September 30, 2006 and $(0.1) million as of December 31, 2005, and an unrealized
gain on a interest rate swap of $0.6 million, net of taxes of $0.4 million,
as
of September 30, 2006 and $0.7 million, net of taxes of $0.5 million as of
December 31, 2005.
11
6)
|
Inventories
|
Inventories
are composed of material, labor and overhead and are stated at the lower of
cost
or market. Costs for inventory at two of the company's manufacturing facilities
have been determined using the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. These
inventories under the LIFO method amounted to $14.2 million at September 30,
2006 and $15.4 million at December 31, 2005 and represented approximately 31%
and 38% of the total inventory in each respective period. Costs for all other
inventory have been determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method.
The company estimates reserves for inventory obsolescence and shrinkage based
on
its judgment of future realization. Inventories at September 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 are as follows:
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Dec.
31, 2005
|
|||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Raw
materials and parts
|
$
|
15,582
|
$
|
11,311
|
|||
Work-in-process
|
6,676
|
6,792
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
24,749
|
22,654
|
|||||
|
47,007
|
40,757
|
|||||
LIFO
adjustment
|
(500
|
)
|
232
|
||||
|
$
|
46,507
|
$
|
40,989
|
7) Accrued
Expenses
Accrued
expenses consist of the following:
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Dec,
31, 2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Accrued
payroll and related expenses
|
$
|
15,944
|
$
|
15,577
|
|||
Accrued
warranty
|
11,865
|
11,286
|
|||||
Accrued
customer rebates
|
10,552
|
10,740
|
|||||
Accrued
income taxes
|
5,512
|
1,499
|
|||||
Accrued
product liability and workers comp
|
4,176
|
2,418
|
|||||
Advanced
customer deposits
|
3,203
|
6,204
|
|||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
16,211
|
14,965
|
|||||
$
|
67,463
|
$
|
62,689
|
8) Warranty
Costs
In
the
normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific
product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period
in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on
contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically
adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts
that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from
amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made
as
changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
12
A
rollforward of the warranty reserve is as follows:
Nine
Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2006 |
||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||
Beginning
balance
|
$
|
11,286
|
||
Warranty
expense
|
7,037
|
|||
Warranty
claims
|
(6,458
|
)
|
||
|
||||
Ending
balance
|
$
|
11,865
|
9) Financing
Arrangements
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Dec.
31, 2005
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Senior
secured revolving credit line
|
$
|
39,750
|
$
|
56,250
|
|||
Senior
secured bank term loans
|
50,625
|
60,000
|
|||||
Foreign
borrowings
|
6,854
|
3,200
|
|||||
Other
note
|
--
|
2,145
|
|||||
Total
debt
|
$
|
97,229
|
$
|
121,595
|
|||
Less:
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
16,704
|
13,780
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
$
|
80,525
|
$
|
107,815
|
During
the fourth quarter of 2005, the company amended its senior secured credit
facility. Terms of the agreement provided for $60.0 million of term loans and
$130.0 million of availability under a revolving credit line. As of September
30, 2006, the company had $90.4 million outstanding under its senior banking
facility, including $50.6 million of unamortized term loans and $39.8 million
of
borrowings under the revolving credit line. The company also had $6.4 million
in
outstanding letters of credit, which reduced the borrowing availability under
the revolving credit line.
Borrowings
under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate of
1.00% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate
and the Federal Funds Rate for short term borrowings. At September 30, 2006,
the
average interest rate on the senior debt amounted to 6.43%. The interest rates
on borrowings under the senior bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based
on
the company’s defined indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis.
Additionally, a commitment fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged
on
the unused portion of the revolving credit line. This variable commitment fee
amounted to 0.20% as of September 30, 2006.
In
December 2005, the company entered into a U.S. dollar secured term loan at
its
subsidiary in Spain. This term loan amortizes in equal monthly installments
over
a four-year period ending December 31, 2009. The unamortized balance under
this
loan amounted to $2.6 million at September 30, 2006. Borrowings under this
facility are assessed at an interest rate of 0.45% above LIBOR. At September
30,
2006, the interest rate on this loan was 5.79%.
13
In
June
2006, the company entered into a U.S. dollar secured promissory note at its
subsidiary in Mexico. This promissory note amortizes in equal monthly
installments over a one-year period. The unamortized balance under this loan
amounted to $0.3 million at September 30, 2006. Borrowings under this facility
are assessed at an interest rate of 10.55%.
In
conjunction with the acquisition of Houno, the company assumed $3.7 million
of
outstanding debt obligations included as part of the net assets acquired.
As of September 30, 2006 the amount of debt associated with Houno amounted
to $4.0 million and included $1.1 million of borrowings on a revolving credit
facility with an average interest rate of 5.54%, $0.9 million of borrowings
under term loan facilities with an average interest rate of 5.52%, and $2.0
million of mortgage notes with an average interest rate of 6.97%.
The
company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. In January 2005,
the
company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount
of
$70.0 million. This agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate of 3.78%.
The notional amount amortizes consistent with the repayment schedule of the
company's term loan maturing November 2009. The unamortized notional amount
of
this swap as of September 30, 2006 was $50.6 million. In January 2006, the
company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount
of
$10.0 million maturing on December 21, 2009. This agreement swaps one-month
LIBOR for a fixed rate of 5.03%. In August 2006, in conjunction with the Houno
acquisition, the company assumed an interest rate swap with a notional amount
of
$1.2 million maturing on December 31, 2018. This agreement swaps one-month
LIBOR
for a fixed rate of 4.84%.
In
2004,
the company entered into a promissory note in conjunction with the release
and
early termination of obligations under a lease agreement relative to a
manufacturing facility in Shelburne, Vermont. Under terms of the agreement,
the
company fully retired this note in September 2006.
The
terms
of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital
expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, certain ratios of
indebtedness and fixed charge coverage. The credit agreement also provides
that
if a material adverse change in the company’s business operations or conditions
occurs, the lender could declare an event of default. Under terms of the
agreement a material adverse effect is defined as (a) a material adverse change
in, or a material adverse effect upon, the operations, business properties,
condition (financial and otherwise) or prospects of the company and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the ability of
the
company to perform under the loan agreements and to avoid any event of default;
or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect
or
enforceability against the company of any loan document. A material adverse
effect is determined on a subjective basis by the company's creditors. At
September 30, 2006, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant
to
its borrowing agreements.
14
10)
|
Acquisition
Integration
|
The
company established reserves through purchase accounting associated with
facility exit costs related to the Blodgett business operations acquired on
December 21, 2001. Reserves for facility closure costs predominately relate
to a
lease obligation for a manufacturing facility that was exited during the second
quarter of 2001, prior to the acquisition, for lease obligations associated
with
a manufacturing facility in Quakertown, Pennsylvania that was exited when
production at this facility was relocated to another facility in Bow, New
Hampshire. The lease associated with the exited facility extends through April
2015. The facility is currently subleased. The remaining reserve balance is
reflected net of anticipated sublease income.
The
forecast of sublease income could differ from actual amounts, which are subject
to the occupancy by a subtenant and a negotiated sublease rental rate. If the
company's estimates or underlying assumptions change in the future, the company
would be required to adjust the reserve amount accordingly.
At
this
time, management believes the remaining reserve balance is adequate to cover
the
remaining costs identified at September 30, 2006. A
summary
of the reserve balance activity related to the facility closure and lease
obligation is as follows:
Nine
Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2006 |
||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||
Beginning
balance
|
$
|
2,598
|
||
Cash
payments
|
100
|
|||
Ending
balance
|
$
|
2,498
|
11) Financial
Instruments
In
June
1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and
Hedging Activities". SFAS No. 133, as amended, establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments. The statement requires an entity
to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure those
instruments at fair value. Derivatives that do not qualify as a hedge must
be
adjusted to fair value in earnings. If the derivative does qualify as a hedge
under SFAS No. 133, changes in the fair value will either be offset against
the
change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments
or
recognized in other accumulated comprehensive income until the hedged item
is
recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a hedge's change in fair
value will be immediately recognized in earnings.
Foreign
Exchange:
The
company has entered into derivative instruments, principally forward contracts
to reduce exposures pertaining to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. As
of
September 30, 2006, the company had forward contracts to purchase $8.6 million
U.S. Dollars with various foreign currencies, all of which mature in the next
fiscal quarter. The fair value of these forward contracts was less than $0.1
million at the end of the quarter.
15
Interest
Rate:
In
January 2005, the company entered into an interest rate swap with a notional
amount of $70.0 million to fix the interest rate applicable to certain of its
variable-rate debt. The notional amount of the swap amortizes consistent with
the repayment schedule of the company's senior term loan maturing in November
2009. As of September 30, 2006, the unamortized balance of the interest rate
swap was $50.6 million. The agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate
of
3.78% and is in effect through November 2009. The company designated the swap
as
a cash flow hedge at its inception and all changes in the fair value of the
swap
are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of September 30,
2006, the fair value of this instrument was $1.1 million. The change in fair
value of this swap agreement in the first nine months of 2006 was a loss of
$120,000, net of taxes of $48,000.
In
January 2006, the company entered into another interest rate swap with a
notional amount of $10.0 million to fix the interest rate applicable to certain
of its variable-rate debt. The agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed
rate
of 5.03% and is in effect through December 2009. The company designated the
swap
a cash flow hedge at its inception and all changes in fair value of the swap
are
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of September 30, 2006,
the fair value of this instrument was $22,000. The change in fair value of
this
swap agreement in the first nine months of 2006 was a gain of $13,000, net
of
taxes of $9,000.
In
August
2006, in conjunction with the Houno acquisition, the company assumed an interest
rate swap with a notional amount of $1.2 million. The agreement swaps one-month
LIBOR for a fixed rate of 4.84% and is in effect through December 31, 2018.
The
company has not designated the swap a cash flow hedge. Therefore, all changes
in
fair value of the swap are recognized in net earnings. The fair value of this
swap agreement as of September 30, 2006 was $(75,000), net of taxes of
$19,000.
12) Segment
Information
The
company operates in three reportable operating segments defined by management
reporting structure and operating activities.
The
Commercial Foodservice Equipment business group manufactures cooking equipment
for the restaurant and institutional kitchen industry. This business division
has manufacturing facilities in Illinois, Michigan, New Hampshire, North
Carolina, Vermont, the Philippines and Denmark. This division supports four
major product groups, including conveyor oven equipment, core cooking equipment,
counterline cooking equipment, and international specialty equipment. Principal
product lines of the conveyor oven product group include Middleby Marshall
ovens, Blodgett ovens and CTX ovens. Principal product lines of the core cooking
equipment product group include the Blodgett product line of ranges, convection
ovens and combi ovens, Houno combi ovens, MagiKitch'n charbroilers and catering
equipment, Nu-Vu baking ovens and proofing equipment, the Pitco Frialator
product line of fryers and the Southbend product line of ranges, steamers,
convection ovens, broilers and steam cooking equipment,. The counterline cooking
and warming equipment product group includes toasters, hot food servers,
foodwarmers and griddles distributed under the Toastmaster brand name. The
international specialty equipment product group is primarily comprised of food
preparation tables, undercounter refrigeration systems, ventilation systems
and
component parts for the U.S. manufacturing operations.
16
The
Industrial Foodservice Equipment business group manufactures cooking and
packaging equipment for the food processing industry. This business division
has
a manufacturing facility in Wisconsin. Its principal products include batch
ovens, conveyorized ovens and continuous process ovens sold under the Alkar
brand name and food packaging machinery sold under the RapidPak brand
name.
The
International Distribution Division provides integrated sales, export
management, distribution and installation services through its operations in
Canada, China, India, South Korea, Mexico, the Philippines, Spain, Taiwan and
the United Kingdom. The division sells the company’s product lines and certain
non-competing complementary product lines throughout the world. For a local
country distributor or dealer, the company is able to provide a centralized
source of foodservice equipment with complete export management and product
support services.
The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. The chief decision maker evaluates
individual segment performance based on operating income. Management believes
that intersegment sales are made at established arms-length transfer
prices.
Net
Sales Summary
(dollars
in thousands)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||
Business
Divisions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core
cooking equipment (1)
|
$
|
62,364
|
60.4
|
$
|
57,192
|
70.7
|
$
|
186,268
|
61.1
|
$
|
172,050
|
71.8
|
|||||||||||||
Conveyor
oven
equipment
|
15,911
|
15.4
|
13,755
|
17.0
|
45,963
|
15.1
|
41,124
|
17.1
|
|||||||||||||||||
Counterline
cooking
equipment
|
2,330
|
2.2
|
3,036
|
3.8
|
8,131
|
2.7
|
9,377
|
3.9
|
|||||||||||||||||
International
specialty
equipment
|
2,024
|
2.0
|
1,898
|
2.3
|
7,311
|
2.4
|
6,769
|
2.8
|
|||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice
|
82,629
|
80.0
|
75,881
|
93.8
|
247,673
|
81.3
|
229,320
|
96.6
|
|||||||||||||||||
Industrial
Foodservice(2)
|
15,389
|
14.9
|
--
|
--
|
43,909
|
14.4
|
--
|
--
|
|||||||||||||||||
International
Distribution
Division
(3)
|
14,023
|
13.6
|
14,764
|
18.2
|
41,602
|
13.6
|
40,476
|
16.9
|
|||||||||||||||||
Intercompany
sales (4)
|
(8,802
|
)
|
(8.5
|
)
|
(9,708
|
)
|
(12.0
|
)
|
(28,347
|
)
|
(9.3
|
)
|
(30,058
|
)
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
103,239
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
80,937
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
304,837
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
239,738
|
100.0
|
%
|
(1) |
Includes
sales of products manufactured by Houno, which was acquired in September
2006.
|
(2) |
Represents
sales of products manufactured by Alkar, which was acquired in December
2005.
|
(3) |
Consists
of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products
manufactured
by third parties.
|
(4) |
Represents
the elimination of sales amongst the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group and from
the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International
Distribution Division.
|
17
The
following table summarizes the results of operations for the company's business
segments(1)(in
thousands):
Commercial
Foodservice(2) |
Industrial
Foodservice(3) |
International
Distribution |
Corporate
and Other(4) |
Eliminations(5)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
Three
months ended September 30, 2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
82,629
|
$
|
15,389
|
$
|
14,023
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(8,802
|
)
|
$
|
103,239
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
22,032
|
3,302
|
694
|
(5,150
|
)
|
143
|
21,021
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
657
|
132
|
63
|
32
|
--
|
884
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
291
|
6
|
51
|
3
|
--
|
351
|
|||||||||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
247,673
|
$
|
43,909
|
$
|
41,602
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(28,347
|
)
|
$
|
304,837
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
64,205
|
5,866
|
2,558
|
(15,629
|
)
|
(552
|
)
|
56,448
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
2,020
|
408
|
133
|
30
|
--
|
2,591
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
734
|
101
|
99
|
302
|
--
|
1,236
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
206,447
|
48,318
|
26,960
|
7,856
|
(6,119
|
)
|
283,462
|
||||||||||||
Long-lived
assets(6)
|
130,382
|
25,964
|
486
|
9,801
|
--
|
166,633
|
|||||||||||||
Three
months ended October 1, 2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
75,881
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
14,764
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(9,708
|
)
|
$
|
80,937
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
18,716
|
--
|
1,404
|
(4,180
|
)
|
344
|
16,284
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
710
|
--
|
36
|
(10
|
)
|
--
|
736
|
||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
406
|
--
|
87
|
(8
|
)
|
--
|
485
|
||||||||||||
Nine
months ended October 1, 2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
229,320
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
40,476
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(30,058
|
)
|
$
|
239,738
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
53,136
|
--
|
2,873
|
(11,065
|
)
|
(320
|
)
|
44,624
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
2,291
|
--
|
108
|
13
|
--
|
2,412
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
956
|
--
|
114
|
15
|
--
|
1,085
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
190,828
|
--
|
26,691
|
3,306
|
(5,185
|
)
|
215,640
|
||||||||||||
Long-lived
assets(6)
|
127,771
|
--
|
431
|
4,635
|
--
|
132,837
|
(1) |
Non-operating
expenses are not allocated to the operating segments. Non-operating
expenses consist of interest expense and
deferred financing amortization, and other income and expenses items
outside of income from operations, and
are included in Corporate and
Other.
|
(2) |
Includes
assets and operations of Houno, which was acquired in September
2006.
|
(3) |
Represents
assets and operations of Alkar, which was acquired in December
2005.
|
(4) |
Includes
corporate and other general company assets and
operations.
|
(5) |
Includes
elimination of intercompany sales, profit in inventory and intercompany
receivables. Intercompany sale transactions
are predominantly from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group
to the
International Distribution
Division.
|
(6) |
Long-lived
assets of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group includes assets
located in the Philippines which amounted
to $2,009 and $2,138 in 2006 and 2005, respectively and assets located
in
Denmark which amounted to $1,688 in
2006.
|
18
Net
sales
by each major geographic region were as follows (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
||||||||||
United
States and Canada
|
$
|
84,035
|
$
|
64,870
|
$
|
248,802
|
$
|
195,338
|
|||||
Asia
|
5,932
|
6,377
|
19,488
|
17,005
|
|||||||||
Europe
and Middle East
|
9,028
|
7,277
|
23,770
|
20,223
|
|||||||||
Latin
America
|
4,244
|
2,413
|
12,777
|
7,172
|
|||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
103,239
|
$
|
80,937
|
$
|
304,837
|
$
|
239,738
|
13) Employee
Retirement Plans
(a) Pension
Plans
The
company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit plan for its union
employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility. Benefits are determined based upon
retirement age and years of service with the company. This defined benefit
plan
was frozen on April 30, 2002 and no further benefits accrue to the participants
beyond this date. Plan participants will receive or continue to receive payments
for benefits earned on or prior to April 30, 2002 upon reaching retirement
age.
The employees participating in the defined benefit plan were enrolled in a
newly
established 401(k) savings plan on September 30, 2002, further described below.
The
company also maintains a retirement benefit agreement with its Chairman. The
retirement benefits are based upon a percentage of the Chairman’s final base
salary. Additionally, the company maintains a retirement plan for non-employee
directors. The plan provides for an annual benefit upon a change in control
of
the company or retirement from the Board of Directors at age 70, equal to 100%
of the director’s last annual retainer, payable for a number of years equal to
the director’s years of service up to a maximum of 10 years.
Contributions
under the union plan are funded in accordance with provisions of The Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Expected contributions to be made in
2006 are $254,000, of which $165,000 was funded during the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2006. Contributions to the directors' plan are based upon
actual retirement benefits as they retire.
19
The
net
pension expense for the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 for these plans
was
as follows (in thousands):
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||
September
30, 2006
|
October
1, 2005
|
||||||||||||
Union
Plan
|
Directors Plans
|
Union
Plan
|
Directors Plans
|
||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
687,557
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
830,924
|
|||||
Interest
on benefit obligations
|
181,133
|
115,906
|
182,449
|
35,636
|
|||||||||
Return
on assets
|
(153,853
|
)
|
--
|
(160,952
|
)
|
--
|
|||||||
Net
amortization and deferral
|
110,571
|
--
|
98,868
|
--
|
|||||||||
Net
pension expense
|
$
|
137,840
|
$
|
803,463
|
$
|
120,365
|
$
|
866,560
|
(b) 401(k)
Savings Plans
The
company maintains four separate defined contribution 401(k) savings plans
covering all employees in the United States. These four plans separately cover
(1) the union employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility, (2) the union employees
at the Lodi, Wisconsin facility, (3) the non-union employees at the Lodi,
Wisconsin facility, and (4) all other remaining non-union employees in the
United States not covered by one of the previous mentioned plans. The company
makes profit sharing contributions to the various plans in accordance with
the
requirements of the plan. Profit sharing contributions for certain of these
401(k) savings plans are at the discretion of the company.
20
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations.
Informational
Note
This
report contains forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor created
by
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company cautions
readers that these projections are based upon future results or events and
are
highly dependent upon a variety of important factors which could cause such
results or events to differ materially from any forward-looking statements
which
may be deemed to have been made in this report, or which are otherwise made
by
or on behalf of the company. Such factors include, but are not limited to,
volatility in earnings resulting from goodwill impairment losses which may
occur
irregularly and in varying amounts; variability in financing costs; quarterly
variations in operating results; dependence on key customers; international
exposure; foreign exchange and political risks affecting international sales;
ability to protect trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property;
changing market conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing;
the
timely development and market acceptance of the company’s products; the
availability and cost of raw materials; and other risks detailed herein and
from
time-to-time in the company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings,
including the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
21
Net
Sales Summary
(dollars
in thousands)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||
Business
Divisions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core
cooking equipment (1)
|
$
|
62,364
|
60.4
|
$
|
57,192
|
70.7
|
$
|
186,268
|
61.1
|
$
|
172,050
|
71.8
|
|||||||||||||
Conveyor
oven
equipment
|
15,911
|
15.4
|
13,755
|
17.0
|
45,963
|
15.1
|
41,124
|
17.1
|
|||||||||||||||||
Counterline
cooking
equipment
|
2,330
|
2.2
|
3,036
|
3.8
|
8,131
|
2.7
|
9,377
|
3.9
|
|||||||||||||||||
International
specialty
equipment
|
2,024
|
2.0
|
1,898
|
2.3
|
7,311
|
2.4
|
6,769
|
2.8
|
|||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice
|
82,629
|
80.0
|
75,881
|
93.8
|
247,673
|
81.3
|
229,320
|
96.6
|
|||||||||||||||||
Industrial
Foodservice(2)
|
15,389
|
14.9
|
--
|
--
|
43,909
|
14.4
|
--
|
--
|
|||||||||||||||||
International
Distribution
Division
(3)
|
14,023
|
13.6
|
14,764
|
18.2
|
41,602
|
13.6
|
40,476
|
16.9
|
|||||||||||||||||
Intercompany
sales (4)
|
(8,802
|
)
|
(8.5
|
)
|
(9,708
|
)
|
(12.0
|
)
|
(28,347
|
)
|
(9.3
|
)
|
(30,058
|
)
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
103,239
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
80,937
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
304,837
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
239,738
|
100.0
|
%
|
(1) |
Includes
sales of products manufactured by Houno, which was acquired in September
2006.
|
(2) |
Represents
sales of products manufactured by Alkar, which was acquired in December
2005.
|
(3) |
Consists
of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products
manufactured
by third parties.
|
(4) |
Represents
the elimination of sales amongst the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group and from
the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International
Distribution Division.
|
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of earnings items
as
a percentage of net sales for the periods.
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Oct.
1, 2005
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
60.7
|
59.9
|
61.3
|
61.6
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
39.3
|
40.1
|
38.7
|
38.4
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
18.9
|
20.0
|
20.2
|
19.8
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
20.4
|
20.1
|
18.5
|
18.6
|
|||||||||
Net
interest expense and deferred financing amortization
|
1.6
|
2.0
|
1.8
|
2.1
|
|||||||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
-
|
0.3
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
18.8
|
17.8
|
16.7
|
16.5
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
7.0
|
5.9
|
6.4
|
6.1
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
11.8
|
%
|
11.9
|
%
|
10.3
|
%
|
10.4
|
%
|
22
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended October 1,
2005
NET
SALES. Net
sales
for the third quarter of fiscal 2006 were $103.2 million as compared to $80.9
million in the third quarter of 2005.
Net
sales
at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group amounted to $82.6 million in
the
third quarter of 2006 as compared to $75.9 million in the prior year quarter.
· |
Core
cooking equipment sales increased by $5.2 million to $62.4 million
from
$57.2 million, primarily due to increased fryer, convection oven,
and
cooking range sales resulting from increased purchases from major
and
regional chain customers due to new store openings and increased
replacement business. Net sales for the quarter also included $1.0
million
of increased combi-oven sales associated with the newly acquired
Houno
product line.
|
· |
Conveyor
oven equipment sales increased $2.1 million to $15.9 million from
$13.8
million in the prior year quarter due to increased sales of new oven
models, including the WOW oven introduced in the first half of
2006.
|
· |
Counterline
cooking equipment sales decreased to $2.3 million from $3.0 million
in the
prior year quarter. Sales during the quarter were impacted in part
by
relocation of production of the counterline products to another
facility.
|
· |
International
specialty equipment sales increased to $2.0 million compared to $1.9
million in the prior year quarter.
|
Net
sales
for the Industrial Foodservice Equipment Group were $15.4 million related to
the
business of Alkar, which was acquired in December 2005.
Net
sales
at the International Distribution Division decreased by $0.7 million to $14.0
million, reflecting higher sales in Latin America, which were more than offset
by reduced sales into Europe and Asia. Sales in Latin America benefited from
expansion of U.S. restaurant chains overseas and increased business with local
and regional restaurant chains in developing markets. The decline in Europe
resulted from a rollout of ovens to a major restaurant chain customer in the
prior year quarter that did not recur in the current year quarter. Sales in
Asia
were impacted by the political situation in North Korea and the timing of store
openings with a major restaurant customer in China.
GROSS
PROFIT. Gross
profit increased to $40.6 million from $32.5 million in the prior year period,
reflecting the impact of higher sales volumes. The gross margin rate was 39.3%
in the quarter as compared to 40.1% in the prior year quarter. The
net decrease in the gross margin rate reflects:
· |
The
adverse impact of lower margins at the newly acquired Alkar
operations.
|
· |
Increased
sales volumes that benefited manufacturing efficiencies and provided
for
greater leverage of fixed manufacturing
costs.
|
· |
Higher
margins associated with new product
sales.
|
23
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined
selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $16.2 million
in
the third quarter of 2005 to $19.6 million in the third quarter of 2006. As
a
percentage of net sales, operating expenses amounted to 18.9% in the third
quarter of 2006 as compared to 20.0% in the third quarter of 2005. Selling
expenses increased from $8.7 million to $10.0 million, reflecting $1.6 million
of increased costs associated with the newly acquired Alkar and Houno operations
and increased selling costs related to the higher sales volumes. General and
administrative expenses increased from $7.5 million to $9.5 million, which
includes increased costs of $0.8 million associated with the newly acquired
Alkar and Houno operations. General and administrative expenses also includes
$0.3 million of increased stock compensation costs, increased incentive
performance costs and increased legal and professional fees.
NON-OPERATING
EXPENSES. Interest
and deferred financing amortization costs were $1.6 million in both the third
quarter of 2006 and 2005. The benefit of lower average debt balances was offset
by higher average interest rates. Other income was less than $0.1 million
in the current year quarter as compared to other expense of $0.3
million in the prior year quarter, primarily related to foreign exchange
transactions.
INCOME
TAXES. A
tax
provision of $7.3 million, at an effective rate of 37%, was recorded during
the
quarter as compared to $4.8 million at a 33% effective rate in the prior year
quarter. The 2006 and 2005 third quarters both reflect a benefit from favorable
adjustments to tax reserves associated with closed tax periods. The 2006 third
quarter reflected a tax benefit of $350,000 as compared to $722,000 in the
third
quarter of 2005.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to Nine Months Ended October 1,
2005
NET
SALES. Net
sales
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 were $304.8 million as
compared to $239.7 million in the nine-month period ended October 1, 2005.
Net
sales
at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group amounted to $247.7 million in
the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $229.3 million in
the
nine-month period ended October 1, 2005.
· |
Core
cooking equipment sales increased by $14.2 million to $186.3 million
from
$172.1 million, primarily due to increased fryer, convection oven,
and
cooking range sales resulting from new product introductions and
increased
purchases from major and regional restaurant chain customers due
to new
store openings and increased replacement business. Net sales for
the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 also included $1.0 million increased
combi-oven sales associated with the newly acquired Houno product
line.
|
· |
Conveyor
oven equipment sales increased $4.9 million to $46.0 million from
$41.1
million in the prior year period, as a result of increased sales
associated with new oven models, including the WOW oven introduced
in the
first half of 2006.
|
· |
Counterline
cooking equipment sales decreased to $8.1 million from $9.4 million
in the
prior year period. The prior year quarter included the rollout of
a
toaster program with a major restaurant chain customer. Additionally,
sales during the third quarter of 2006, were impacted by the relocation
of
production of the counterline products to another facility.
|
· |
International
specialty equipment sales increased to $7.3 million compared to $6.8
million in the prior year quarter due to the introduction of a new
product
line of counter griddles and
charbroilers.
|
24
Net
sales
for Industrial Foodservice Equipment Group were $43.9 million related to the
business of Alkar, which was acquired in December 2005.
Net
sales
at the International Distribution Division increased by $1.1 million to $41.6
million, reflecting higher sales in Latin America, which more than offset a
decline in sales in Europe, which had strong sales in the prior year due to
an
oven rollout with a major restaurant chain customer. Sales in Latin America
benefited from expansion of the U.S. chains overseas and increased business
with
local and regional restaurant chains in developing markets.
GROSS
PROFIT. Gross
profit increased to $117.8 million from $92.1 million in the prior year period,
reflecting the impact of higher sales volumes. The gross margin rate was 38.7%
in the quarter as compared to 38.4% in the prior year nine-month period. The
net
increase in the gross margin rate reflects:
· |
Increased
sales volumes that benefited manufacturing efficiencies and provided
for
greater leverage of fixed manufacturing
costs.
|
· |
Higher
margins associated with new product
sales.
|
· |
Improved
margins at Nu-Vu, which was acquired in January 2005. The margin
improvement at this operation reflects the benefits of successful
integration efforts.
|
· |
The
adverse impact of lower margins at the newly acquired Alkar
operations.
|
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined
selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $47.5 million
in
the nine-month period ended October 1, 2005 to $61.4 million in the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2006. As a percentage of net sales, operating
expenses amounted to 20.2% in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006,
versus 19.8% in the nine-month period ended October 1, 2005 reflecting greater
leverage on higher sales volumes. Selling expenses increased from $25.7 million
to $30.9 million, reflecting $3.6 million of increased costs associated with
the
newly acquired Alkar and Houno operations and higher commission costs associated
with the increased sales volumes. General and administrative expenses increased
from $21.8 million to $30.5 million which includes increased costs of $3.1
million associated with the newly acquired Alkar and Houno operations. General
and administrative expenses also include increased stock compensation costs,
increased incentive performance costs and increased legal and professional
fees.
NON-OPERATING
EXPENSES. Interest
and deferred financing amortization costs increased to $5.4 million from $5.1
million in the prior year, due to higher interest rates, which more than offset
the benefit of lower average debt balances.
INCOME
TAXES. A
tax
provision of $19.7 million, at an effective rate of 39%, was recorded for the
first nine months of 2006 as compared to $14.6 million at a 37% effective rate
in the prior year period. The 2006 and 2005 nine-month periods both reflect
a
benefit from favorable adjustments to tax reserves associated with closed tax
periods amounting to $350,000 and $722,000, respectively.
25
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2006, cash and cash equivalents decreased
by
$0.9 million to $3.0 million at September 30, 2006 from $3.9 million at December
31, 2005. Net borrowings decreased from $121.6 million at December 31, 2005
to
$97.3 million at September 30, 2006.
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES. Net
cash
provided by operating activities after changes in assets and liabilities was
$33.4 million as compared to $30.8 million in the prior year period.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2006, working capital levels increased
due
to the higher sales volumes and increased seasonal working capital needs. The
changes in working capital included a $11.9 million increase in accounts
receivable and a $3.1 million increase in inventory. Prepaid and other assets
decreased due to the utilization of tax overpayments in the first nine months
of
2006. Accrued expenses and other liabilities increased by $6.4 million as a
result of increased accruals for operating liabilities associated with higher
business volumes.
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net cash used in investing activities
amounted to $7.7 million. This included $1.5 million associated with the
acquisition of Alkar, $4.9 million associated with the acquisition of Houno
and
$1.2 million of additions and upgrades of production equipment, manufacturing
facilities and training equipment.
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES. Net
cash
flows used in financing activities were $26.7 million during the nine months
ending September 30, 2006. The net reduction in debt includes $16.5 million
in
repayments under the revolving credit facility and $9.4 million of scheduled
repayments of the term loan. The company also repaid in full $2.1 million note
related and established in conjunction with the release and early termination
of
obligations under a lease agreement relative to a manufacturing facility tax
was
exited in Shelburne, Vermont.
In
conjunction with the acquisition of Houno, the company also acquired $3.7
million of debt included in the net assets of the acquired
operations.
At
September 30, 2006, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant
to
its borrowing agreements. Management believes that future cash flows from
operating activities and borrowing availability under the revolving credit
facility will provide the company with sufficient financial resources to meet
its anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and
debt
amortization for the foreseeable future.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs - an amendment
of
ARB No. 43, Chapter 4". This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4 to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material. This statement requires
that these items be recognized as current period costs and also requires that
allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based
on
the normal capacity of the production facilities. This statement is effective
for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the company's
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
26
In
May
2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
-
a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3". This statement
replaces ABP Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes and FASB Statement No. 3,
Reporting Changes in Interim Financial Statements and changes the requirements
for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principles.
This
statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles. This
statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made
in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The company will apply this
guidance prospectively.
In
February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140". This
statement provides entities with relief from having to separately determine
the
fair value of an embedded derivative that would otherwise be required to be
bifurcated from its host contract in accordance with SFAS No. 133. This
statement allows an entity to make an irrevocable election to measure such
a
hybrid financial instrument at fair value in its entirety, with changes in
fair
value recognized in earnings. This statement is effective for all financial
instruments acquired, issued, or subject to a remeasurement (new basis) event
occurring after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins
after
September 15, 2006. The company will apply this guidance prospectively. The
company is continuing its process of determining what impact the application
of
this guidance will have on the company's financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In
July
2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes.” This interpretation requires that a recorded tax benefit must be
more likely than not of being sustained upon examination by tax authorities
based upon its technical merits. The amount of benefit recorded is the largest
amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized
upon
ultimate settlement. Upon adoption, any adjustment will be recorded directly
to
beginning retained earnings. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The company has not yet determined what
impact the application of the interpretation will have on the company’s
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value
measurements. This statement is effective for interim reporting periods in
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company will apply this
guidance prospectively.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”. This statement improves financial reporting by
requiring an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of
a
defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset of liability in its statement
of
financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year
in
which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity.
This
statement also improves financial reporting by requiring an employer to measure
the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of
financial position, with limited exceptions. Employers with publicly traded
equity securities are required to initially recognize the funded status of
a
defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures
as
of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The company has
not yet determined what impact the application of the interpretation will have
on the company’s financial position.
27
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are
based upon the company's consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the
company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related disclosures.
On an
ongoing basis, the company evaluates its estimates and judgments based on
historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Property
and equipment: Property
and equipment are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their
useful lives based on management's estimates of the period over which the assets
will be utilized to benefit the operations of the company. The useful lives
are
estimated based on historical experience with similar assets, taking into
account anticipated technological or other changes. The company
periodically reviews these lives relative to physical factors, economic factors
and industry trends. If there are changes in the planned use of property and
equipment or if technological changes were to occur more rapidly than
anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened,
resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense
in future periods.
Long-lived
assets: Long-lived
assets (including goodwill and other intangibles) are reviewed for impairment
annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the
recoverability of the company's long-lived assets, the company considers changes
in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash
flows and other factors. Estimates of future cash flows are judgments
based on the company's experience and knowledge of operations. These
estimates can be significantly impacted by many factors including changes in
global and local business and economic conditions, operating costs, inflation,
competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the company's
estimates or the underlying assumptions change in the future, the company may
be
required to record impairment charges.
Warranty: In
the
normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific
product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period
in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on
contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically
adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts
that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from
amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made
as
changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
Litigation: From
time
to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The
company maintains insurance to cover product liability, workers compensation,
property and casualty, and general liability matters. The company is
required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these
matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of
the amount of accrual required, if any, for these contingencies is made after
assessment of each matter and the related insurance coverage. The reserve
requirements may change in the future due to new developments or changes in
approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these
matters. The company does not believe that any such matter will have a
material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Income
taxes: The
company operates in numerous foreign and domestic taxing jurisdictions where
it
is subject to various types of tax, including sales tax and income tax.
The company's tax filings are subject to audits and adjustments. Because of
the
nature of the company’s operations, the nature of the audit items can be
complex, and the objectives of the government auditors can result in a tax
on
the same transaction or income in more than one state or country. As part
of the company's calculation of the provision for taxes, the company establishes
reserves for the amount that it expects to incur as a result of audits. The
reserves may change in the future due to new developments related to the various
tax matters.
28
Contractual
Obligations
The
company's contractual cash payment obligations are set forth below (in
thousands):
Long-term
Debt |
Operating
Leases |
Idle
Facility
Leases |
Total Contractual
Cash Obligations |
||||||||||
Less
than 1 year
|
$
|
16,704
|
$
|
537
|
$
|
320
|
$
|
17,561
|
|||||
1-3
years
|
33,710
|
730
|
689
|
35,129
|
|||||||||
4-5
years
|
45,026
|
312
|
836
|
46,174
|
|||||||||
After
5 years
|
1,789
|
91
|
1,705
|
3,585
|
|||||||||
|
$
|
97,229
|
$
|
1,670
|
$
|
3,550
|
$
|
102,449
|
Idle
facility lease consists of an obligation for a manufacturing location that
was
exited in conjunction with the company's manufacturing consolidation efforts.
This lease obligation continues through April 2015. This facility has been
subleased. The obligation presented above does not reflect any anticipated
sublease income from the facilities.
The
projected benefit obligation of the defined benefit plans exceeded the plans’
assets by $2.4 million at the end of 2005 as compared to $5.0 million at the
end
of 2004. The unfunded benefit obligations were comprised of a $1.0 million
under
funding of the company's union plan and $1.4 million of under funding of the
company's director plans. The company does not expect to contribute to the
director plans in 2006. The company made minimum contributions required by
the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(“ERISA”) of $0.3 million in 2005 and $0.2 million in 2004 to the company's
union plan. The company expects to continue to make minimum contributions of
$0.3 million in 2006 to the union plan as required by ERISA.
29
The
company has $6.4 million in outstanding letters of credit, which expire on
September 30, 2007 with an automatic one-year renewal, to secure potential
obligations under insurance programs.
The
company places purchase orders with its suppliers in the ordinary course of
business. These purchase orders are generally to fulfill short-term
manufacturing requirements of less than 90 days and most are cancelable with
a
restocking penalty. The company has no long-term purchase contracts or minimum
purchase obligations with any supplier.
The
company has contractual obligations under its various debt agreements to make
interest payments. These amounts are subject to the level of borrowings in
future periods and the interest rate for the applicable periods, and therefore
the amounts of these payments is not determinable.
The
company has no activities, obligations or exposures associated with off-balance
sheet arrangements.
30
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
The
company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. The
following table summarizes the maturity of the company’s debt
obligations.
Twelve Month Period Ending |
Fixed
Rate Debt
|
Variable
Rate
Debt
|
|||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
September
30, 2007
|
$
|
79
|
$
|
16,625
|
|||
September
30, 2008
|
79
|
15,837
|
|||||
September
30, 2009
|
81
|
17,713
|
|||||
September
30, 2010
|
84
|
44,942
|
|||||
Thereafter
|
1,677
|
112
|
|||||
|
$
|
2,000
|
$
|
95,229
|
During
the fourth quarter of 2005, the company amended its senior secured credit
facility. Terms of the agreement provided for $60.0 million of term loans and
$130.0 million of availability under a revolving credit line. As of September
30, 2006, the company had $90.4 million outstanding under its senior banking
facility, including $50.6 million of unamortized term loans and $39.8 million
of
borrowings under the revolving credit line. The company also had $6.4 million
in
outstanding letters of credit, which reduced the borrowing availability under
the revolving credit line.
Borrowings
under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate of
1.00% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate
and the Federal Funds Rate for short-term borrowings. At September 30, 2006,
the
average interest rate on the senior debt amounted to 6.43%. The interest rates
on borrowings under the senior bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based
on
the company’s defined indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis.
Additionally, a commitment fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged
on
the unused portion of the revolving credit line. This variable commitment fee
amounted to 0.20% as of September 30, 2006.
In
December 2005, the company entered into a U.S. Dollar secured term loan at
its
subsidiary in Spain. This loan amortizes in equal monthly installments over
a
four year period ending December 31, 2009. The unamortized balance under this
loan amounted to $2.6 million at September 30, 2006. Borrowings under this
facility are assessed an interest rate of 0.45% above LIBOR. At September 30,
2006 the interest rate was 5.79%.
In
June
2006, the company entered into a U.S. dollar secured promissory note at its
subsidiary in Mexico. This promissory note amortizes in equal monthly
installments over a one-year period. The unamortized balance under this loan
amounted to $0.3 million at September 30, 2006. Borrowings under this facility
are assessed at an interest rate of 10.55%.
In
conjunction with the acquisition of Houno, the company assumed $3.7 million
of
outstanding debt obligations included as part of the net assets acquired.
As of September 30, 2006 the amount of debt associated with Houno amounted
to $4.0 million and included $1.1 million of borrowings on a revolving credit
facility with an average interest rate of 5.54%, $0.9 million of borrowings
under term loan facilities with an average interest rate of 5.52%, and $2.0
million of mortgage notes with an average interest rate of 6.97%.
31
The
company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. In January 2005,
the
company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount
of
$70.0 million. This agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate of 3.78%.
The notional amount amortizes consistent with the repayment schedule of the
company's term loan maturing November 2009. The unamortized notional amount
of
this swap as of September 30, 2006 was $50.6 million. In January 2006, the
company entered into an interest rate swap for a notional amount of $10.0
million maturing on December 31, 2009. This agreement swaps one-month LIBOR
for
a fixed rate of 5.03%. In August 2006, in conjunction with the Houno
acquisition, the company assumed an interest rate swap with a notional amount
of
$1.2 million maturing on December 31, 2018. This agreement swaps one-month
LIBOR
for a fixed rate of 4.84%.
In
November 2004, the company entered into a promissory note in conjunction with
the release and early termination of obligations under a lease agreement
relative to a manufacturing facility in Shelburne, Vermont. In 2004, the company
entered into a promissory note in conjunction with the release and early
termination of obligations under a lease agreement relative to a manufacturing
facility in Shelburne, Vermont. Under terms of the agreement, the company fully
retired this note in September 2006.
The
terms
of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital
expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, certain ratios of
indebtedness and fixed charge coverage. The credit agreement also provides
that
if a material adverse change in the company’s business operations or conditions
occurs, the lender could declare an event of default. Under terms of the
agreement a material adverse effect is defined as (a) a material adverse change
in, or a material adverse effect upon, the operations, business properties,
condition (financial and otherwise) or prospects of the company and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the ability of
the
company to perform under the loan agreements and to avoid any event of default;
or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect
or
enforceability against the company of any loan document. A material adverse
effect is determined on a subjective basis by the company's creditors. At
September 30, 2006, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant
to
its borrowing agreements.
32
Financing
Derivative Instruments
In
January 2005, the company entered into an interest rate swap with a notional
amount of $70.0 million to fix the interest rate applicable to certain of its
variable-rate debt. The notional amount of the swap amortizes consistent with
the repayment schedule of the company's senior term loan maturing in November
2009. The agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate of 3.78% and is
in
effect through November 2009. The interest rate swap has been designated a
cash
flow hedge, and in accordance with SFAS No. 133 the changes in fair value are
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. As of
September 30, 2006, the fair value of this instrument was $1.1 million. The
change in fair value of this swap agreement in the first nine months of 2006
was
a loss of $120,000, net of taxes of $48,000. In January 2006, the company
entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of $10.0
million maturing on December 21, 2009. This agreement swaps one month LIBOR
for
a fixed rate of 5.03%. The interest rate swap has been designated a cash flow
hedge, and in accordance with SFAS No. 133 the changes in fair value are
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. As of
September 30, 2006, the fair value of this instrument was $22,000. The change
in
fair value of this swap agreement in the first nine months of 2006 was a gain
of
$13,000, net of taxes of $9,000. In August 2006, in conjunction with the Houno
acquisition, the company assumed an interest rate swap with a notional amount
of
$1.2 million. The fair value of this swap agreement as of September 30, 2006
was
$(75,000), net of taxes of $19,000.
Foreign
Exchange Derivative Financial Instruments
The
company uses foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts with terms
of
less than one year, to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. The company’s primary hedging activities are to mitigate its
exposure to changes in exchange rates on intercompany and third party trade
receivables and payables. The company does not currently enter into derivative
financial instruments for speculative purposes. In managing its foreign currency
exposures, the company identifies and aggregates naturally occurring offsetting
positions and then hedges residual balance sheet exposures. The following table
summarizes the forward and option purchase contracts outstanding at September
30, 2006. The fair value of these forward contracts was less than $0.1 million
at the end of the quarter:
Sell
|
Purchase
|
Maturity
|
||||||
1,000,000
|
|
Euro
|
|
1,270,200
|
|
U.S.
Dollars
|
|
October
30, 2006
|
3,150,000
|
|
British
Pounds
|
|
5,897,400
|
|
U.S.
Dollars
|
|
October
30, 2006
|
10,000,000
|
|
Mexican
Pesos
|
|
903,300
|
|
U.S.
Dollars
|
|
October
30, 2006
|
6,000,000
|
|
Mexican
Pesos
|
|
540,300
|
|
U.S.
Dollars
|
|
October
30, 2006
|
33
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
The
company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the company's Exchange Act reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to the company's management, including its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
As
of
September 30, 2006, the company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision
and with the participation of the company's management, including the company's
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the
design and operation of the company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on the foregoing, the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the company's
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of this
period.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2006, there has been no change in the company's
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or
is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting.
34
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
The
company was not required to report the information pursuant to Items 1 through
6
of Part II of Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2006, except
as
follows:
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes in the risk factors as set forth in the company's
2005 Anuual Report on Form 10-K.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
In
September 1998, the company's Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase
program and subsequently authorized the purchase of up to 1,800,000 common
shares in open market purchases. As of September 30, 2006, 952,999 shares had
been purchased under the 1998 stock repurchase program. No shares were
repurchased by the company during the three month period ended September 30,
2006.
35
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibits
- The following exhibits are filed herewith:
Exhibit 3.1 - |
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
Exhibit 31.2 - |
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Exhibit 32.1 - |
Certification
by the Principal Executive Officer of The Middleby Corporation Pursuant
to
Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C.
1350).
|
Exhibit 32.2 - |
Certification
by the Principal Financial Officer of The Middleby Corporation Pursuant
to
Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C.
1350).
|
36
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION | ||
(Registrant) | ||
|
|
|
Date November 9, 2006 | By: | /s/ Timothy J. FitzGerald |
Timothy J. FitzGerald |
||
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
37