MIDDLEBY Corp - Quarter Report: 2007 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the quarterly period ended September 29, 2007
or
o Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Commission
File No. 1-9973
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION
|
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its
Charter)
|
Delaware
|
36-3352497
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
1400
Toastmaster Drive, Elgin, Illinois
|
60120
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
Telephone No., including Area Code
|
|
(847)
741-3300
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer x Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No
x
As
of
November 2, 2007, there were 16,730,888 shares of the registrant's common stock
outstanding.
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2007
INDEX
DESCRIPTION
|
PAGE
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
1
|
|
September
29, 2007 and December 30, 2006
|
||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
|
2
|
|
September
29, 2007 and September 30, 2006
|
||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
3
|
|
September
29, 2007 and September 30, 2006
|
||
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
4
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
18
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
28
|
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
31
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
32
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
32
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
32
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts
In Thousands, Except Share Data)
(Unaudited)
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Dec.
30, 2006
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
7,616
|
$
|
3,534
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of $6,483 and
$5,101
|
69,698
|
51,580
|
|||||
Inventories,
net
|
68,325
|
47,292
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
8,156
|
3,289
|
|||||
Prepaid
taxes
|
977
|
1,129
|
|||||
Current
deferred taxes
|
11,449
|
10,851
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
166,221
|
117,675
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $39,825
and
$37,006
|
36,141
|
28,534
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
129,241
|
101,258
|
|||||
Other
intangibles
|
53,844
|
35,306
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
1,849
|
2,249
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
387,296
|
$
|
285,022
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
$
|
16,765
|
$
|
16,838
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
32,825
|
19,689
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
84,236
|
69,636
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
133,826
|
106,163
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
91,083
|
65,964
|
|||||
Long-term
deferred tax liability
|
5,240
|
5,867
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
9,456
|
6,455
|
|||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; nonvoting; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
none
issued
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Common
stock, $0.005 par value; 47,500,000 shares authorized; 20,585,932
and
23,615,534 shares issued in 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
119
|
117
|
|||||
Paid-in
capital
|
84,842
|
73,743
|
|||||
Treasury
stock at cost; 3,855,044 shares in 2007 and 2006,
respectively
|
(89,641
|
)
|
(89,641
|
)
|
|||
Retained
earnings
|
151,640
|
115,917
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
732
|
437
|
|||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
147,691
|
100,573
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
387,296
|
$
|
285,022
|
See
accompanying notes
1
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
135,996
|
$
|
103,239
|
$
|
354,939
|
$
|
304,837
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
84,600
|
62,664
|
217,552
|
187,011
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
51,396
|
40,575
|
137,387
|
117,826
|
|||||||||
Selling
expenses
|
13,507
|
10,009
|
36,575
|
30,901
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
12,465
|
9,545
|
35,380
|
30,477
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
25,424
|
21,021
|
65,432
|
56,448
|
|||||||||
Net
interest expense and deferred financing
amortization
|
1,621
|
1,618
|
4,138
|
5,445
|
|||||||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
(316
|
)
|
(37
|
)
|
(1,053
|
)
|
35
|
||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
24,119
|
19,440
|
62,347
|
50,968
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
10,063
|
7,263
|
24,989
|
19,650
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
14,056
|
$
|
12,177
|
$
|
37,358
|
$
|
31,318
|
|||||
Net
earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.89
|
$
|
0.80
|
$
|
2.39
|
$
|
2.05
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.83
|
$
|
0.74
|
$
|
2.22
|
$
|
1.90
|
|||||
Weighted
average number of shares
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
15,743
|
15,290
|
15,632
|
15,258
|
|||||||||
Dilutive
stock options1,
2
|
1,191
|
1,206
|
1,225
|
1,256
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
16,934
|
16,496
|
16,857
|
16,514
|
1
|
There
were no anti-dilutive stock options excluded from common stock equivalents
for the three and nine month periods ended September 29,
2007.
|
2
|
There
were 7,000 anti-dilutive stock options excluded from common stock
equivalents in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2006.
|
See
accompanying notes
2
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
Thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities-
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
37,358
|
$
|
31,318
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,850
|
3,643
|
|||||
Deferred
taxes
|
1,417
|
249
|
|||||
Non-cash
share-based compensation
|
5,540
|
3,416
|
|||||
Cash
effects of changes in -
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
(5,674
|
)
|
(11,972
|
)
|
|||
Inventories,
net
|
(2,992
|
)
|
(3,145
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(4,576
|
)
|
3,186
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
6,866
|
290
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
3,195
|
6,379
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
45,984
|
33,364
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities-
|
|||||||
Net
additions to property and equipment
|
(1,689
|
)
|
(1,236
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of Alkar
|
—
|
(1,500
|
)
|
||||
Acquisition
of Houno
|
(179
|
)
|
(4,939
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of Jade
|
(7,779
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Acquisition
of Carter Hoffmann
|
(16,152
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Acquisition
of MP Equipment
|
(15,193
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Acquisition
of Wells Bloomfield
|
(28,805
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(69,797
|
)
|
(7,675
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities-
|
|||||||
Net
proceeds
(repayments) under revolving credit facilities
|
36,750
|
(16,500
|
)
|
||||
Repayments
under senior secured bank notes
|
(11,250
|
)
|
(9,375
|
)
|
|||
Repayments
under foreign bank loan
|
(822
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Repayments
under note agreement
|
—
|
(2,145
|
)
|
||||
Net
proceeds from stock issuances
|
3,121
|
1,284
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
27,799
|
(26,736
|
)
|
||||
Effect
of exchange rates on cash and cash
equivalents
|
94
|
121
|
|||||
Cash
acquired in acquisition
|
2
|
43
|
|||||
Changes
in cash and cash equivalents-
|
|||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
4,082
|
(883
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
3,534
|
3,908
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of quarter
|
$
|
7,616
|
$
|
3,025
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
3,844
|
$
|
4,898
|
|||
Income
tax payments
|
$
|
24,815
|
$
|
8,557
|
See
accompanying notes
3
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
29, 2007
(Unaudited)
1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
A) Basis
of Presentation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by The Middleby
Corporation (the "company"), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements are unaudited
and
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
such
rules and regulations, although the company believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information not misleading. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes
contained in the company's 2006 Form 10-K.
In
the
opinion of management, the financial statements contain all adjustments
necessary to present fairly the financial position of the company as of
September 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, and the results of operations for
the
three and nine months ended September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006 and
cash flows for the nine months ended September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006.
B) Share-Based
Compensation
Share-based
compensation expense is calculated by estimating the fair value of market based
stock awards and stock options at the time of grant and amortized over the
stock
options’ vesting period. Share-based compensation expense was $2.2 million and
$1.2 million for the third quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Share-based
compensation was $5.5 million and $3.4 million for the nine month periods ended
September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.
C) Income
Tax Contingencies
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Interpretation
No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). This
interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should
recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain
tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.
FIN
48 states that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized
only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable, based on
its technical merits. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest
amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon
settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant
information. A tax benefit from an uncertain position was previously recognized
if it was probable of being sustained. Under FIN 48, the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits is classified as non-current unless the liability
is
expected to be settled in cash within 12 months of the reporting date. FIN
48 is
effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after December
15, 2006. The company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on the first day of
fiscal 2007 (December 31, 2006), as required.
4
The
following table indicates the effect of the application of FIN 48 on individual
line items in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of the adoption date (dollars
in
thousands).
Before
|
After
|
|||||||||
FIN
48
|
Adjustment
|
FIN
48
|
||||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
$
|
69,636
|
$
|
(5,395
|
)
|
$
|
64,241
|
|||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
$
|
6,455
|
$
|
7,030
|
$
|
13,485
|
||||
Retained
earnings
|
$
|
115,917
|
$
|
(1,635
|
)
|
$
|
114,282
|
The
company operates in multiple taxing jurisdictions, both within the United States
and outside of the United States, and faces audits from various tax authorities
regarding transfer pricing, the deductibility of certain expenses, intercompany
transactions as well as other matters. As of the adoption date, the total amount
of liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to federal, state and foreign
taxes was approximately $5.7 million (of which the entire amount would impact
the effective tax rate if recognized) plus approximately $0.5 million of accrued
interest and $0.8 million of penalties. As of September 29, 2007, the
corresponding balance of liability for unrecognized tax benefits is
approximately $6.0 million plus approximately $0.7 million of accrued interest
and $0.8 million of penalties. The company recognizes interest and penalties
accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense, which is
consistent with reporting in prior periods.
The
company is not currently under examination in any tax jurisdiction; however
it
remains subject to examination until the statute of limitations expires for
the
respective tax jurisdiction. Within specific countries, the company and its
operating subsidiaries may be subject to audit by various tax authorities and
may be subject to different statute of limitations expiration dates. A summary
of the tax years that remain subject to examination in the company’s major tax
jurisdictions are:
United
States – federal
|
2004
- 2006
|
United
States – states
|
2003
- 2006
|
China
|
2006
|
Denmark
|
2006
|
Mexico
|
2006
|
Philippines
|
2004
- 2006
|
South
Korea
|
2004
- 2006
|
Spain
|
2003
- 2006
|
Taiwan
|
2005
- 2006
|
United
Kingdom
|
2006
|
The
company does not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will
significantly change due to the settlement of audits and the expiration of
statute of limitations prior to September 29, 2008.
5
2) |
Acquisitions
and Purchase Accounting
|
Houno
On
August
31, 2006, the company acquired the stock of Houno A/S (“Houno”) located in
Denmark for $4.9 million in cash. The company also assumed $3.7 million of
debt
included as part of the net assets of Houno.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements.
The
allocation of cash paid for the Houno acquisition is summarized as follows
(in
thousands):
Aug. 31, 2006
|
Adjustments
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
4,325
|
$
|
(287
|
)
|
$
|
4,038
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
4,371
|
—
|
4,371
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
1,287
|
799
|
2,086
|
|||||||
Other
intangibles
|
1,139
|
(199
|
)
|
940
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
92
|
—
|
92
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,061
|
)
|
(134
|
)
|
(3,195
|
)
|
||||
Long-term
debt
|
(2,858
|
)
|
—
|
(2,858
|
)
|
|||||
Long-term
deferred tax liability
|
(356
|
)
|
—
|
(356
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
4,939
|
$
|
179
|
$
|
5,118
|
The
goodwill is subject to the nonamortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 from
the
date of acquisition. Other intangibles also includes $0.1 million allocated
to
backlog and $0.8 million allocated to developed technology which are amortized
over periods of 1 month and 5 years, respectively. Goodwill and other
intangibles of Houno are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group
for segment reporting purposes. These assets are not deductible for tax
purposes.
Jade
On
April
1, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Jade Product Company (“Jade”), a leading manufacturer of commercial and
residential cooking equipment from Maytag Corporation ("Maytag") for an
aggregate purchase price of $7.4 million in cash. The purchase price is subject
to adjustment based upon a working capital provision within the purchase
agreement.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
6
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Jade acquisition is summarized
as
follows (in thousands):
Apr. 1, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
6,727
|
$
|
(2,605
|
)
|
$
|
4,122
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
2,029
|
—
|
2,029
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
250
|
3,430
|
3,680
|
|||||||
Other
intangibles
|
1,590
|
—
|
1,590
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,205
|
)
|
(437
|
)
|
(3,642
|
)
|
||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
7,391
|
$
|
388
|
$
|
7,779
|
The
goodwill and $1.4 million of other intangibles which are comprised of the
tradename, associated with the Jade acquisition, are subject to the
non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 from the date of acquisition. Other
intangibles of $0.2 million allocated to customer relationships are to be
amortized over a periods of 10 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of Jade
are
allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting
purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for tax
purposes.
Carter-Hoffmann
On
June
29, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Carter-Hoffmann (“Carter-Hoffmann”), a leading manufacturer of commercial
cooking and warming equipment, from Carrier Commercial Refrigeration
Inc.,
a
subsidiary of Carrier Corporation, which is a unit of United Technologies
Corporation, for
an
aggregate purchase price of $15.9 million in cash.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Carter-Hoffmann acquisition is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
Jun. 29, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
7,912
|
$
|
(2,026
|
)
|
$
|
5,886
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
2,264
|
—
|
2,264
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
9,452
|
(900
|
)
|
8,552
|
||||||
Other
intangibles
|
—
|
3,910 | 3,910 | |||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,646
|
)
|
(760
|
)
|
(4,406
|
)
|
||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(54
|
)
|
—
|
(54
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
15,928
|
$
|
224
|
$
|
16,152
|
The
goodwill and $2.3 million of other intangibles, which are comprised of the
trade
name, associated with the Carter-Hoffmann acquisition is subject to the
non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 from the date of acquisition. Other
intangibles of $1.6 million allocated to customer relationships are to be
amortized over a period of 4 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of
Carter-Hoffmann are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group
for
segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for
tax
purposes.
7
MP
Equipment
On
July
2, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
MP Equipment (“MP Equipment”), a leading manufacturer of food processing
equipment for a purchase price of $15.0 million in cash. An additional deferred
payment of $2.0 million is also due to the seller at the earlier of three years
or upon the achievement of reaching certain profit targets. An additional
contingent payment of $1.0 million is also payable if the business reaches
certain target profits.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the MP Equipment acquisition is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
Jul
2, 2007
|
||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
5,315
|
||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
297
|
|||
Goodwill
|
9,290
|
|||
Other
intangibles
|
6,420 | |||
Other
assets
|
16
|
|||
Current
liabilities
|
(4,018
|
)
|
||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(2,127
|
)
|
||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
15,193
|
The
goodwill and $3.3 million of other intangibles, which are comprised of the
trade
name, associated
with the MP Equipment acquisition is subject to the non-amortization provisions
of SFAS No. 142 from the date of acquisition. Other intangibles also includes
$1.0 million allocated to backlog, $0.3 million allocated to developed
technology and $1.9 million allocated to customer
relationships which are to be amortized
over periods of 6 months, 5 years and 5 years, respectively. Goodwill
and other intangibles of MP Equipment are allocated to the Food Processing
Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to
be
deductible for tax purposes.
Wells
Bloomfield
On
August
3, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Wells Bloomfield (“Wells Bloomfield”), a leading manufacturer of commercial
cooking and beverage equipment from Carrier Commercial Refrigeration
Inc.,
a
subsidiary of Carrier Corporation, which is a unit of United Technologies
Corporation, for
an
aggregate purchase price of $28.4 million in cash. The purchase price is subject
to adjustment based upon a working capital provision within the purchase
agreement.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
8
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Wells Bloomfield acquisition is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
Aug.
3, 2007
|
||||
Cash
|
$
|
2
|
||
Current
assets
|
15,133
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
3,961
|
|||
Goodwill
|
5,835
|
|||
Other
intangibles
|
8,130
|
|||
Other
assets
|
21
|
|||
Current
liabilities
|
(4,277
|
)
|
||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
—
|
|||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
28,805
|
The
goodwill and $5.0 million of other intangibles, which are comprised of the
trade
name, associated
with the Wells Bloomfield acquisition is subject to the non-amortization
provisions of SFAS No. 142 from the date of acquisition. Other intangibles
of
$3.1 million allocated to customer relationships are to be amortized over a
period of 4 years. Goodwill
and other intangibles of Wells Bloomfield are allocated to the Commercial
Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are
expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
3)
|
Stock
Split
|
On
May 3,
2007, the company’s Board of Directors authorized a two-for-one split of the
company’s common stock in the form of a stock dividend. The stock dividend was
paid on June 15, 2007 to company shareholders of record as of June 1, 2007.
The
company’s common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on June 18, 2007.
All references in the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements
and notes thereto to net earnings per share and the number of shares have been
adjusted to reflect this stock split.
4)
|
Litigation
Matters
|
From
time
to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The
company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers
compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The
company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or
outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses.
A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these
contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance
coverage. The reserve requirement may change in the future due to new
developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy
in
dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows of the company.
9
5)
|
Recently
Issued Accounting
Standards
|
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value
measurements. This statement is effective for interim reporting periods in
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company will apply this
guidance prospectively. The company is continuing its process of determining
what impact the application of this guidance will have on the company's
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”. One provision of SFAS No. 158 requires the
measurement of the company’s defined benefit plan’s assets and its obligation to
determine the funded status be made as of the end of the fiscal year. This
provision of SFAS No. 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after December
15, 2008. The company does not anticipate that the impact from the adoption
of
this provision of SFAS No. 158 will be significant to its financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement
is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company will
apply this guidance prospectively. The company is continuing its process of
determining what impact the application of this guidance will have on the
company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
6) |
Other
Comprehensive Income
|
The
company reports changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from
investment by owners and distribution to owners, in accordance with SFAS No.
130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income."
Components
of other comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
||||||||||
Net
earnings.
|
$
|
14,056
|
$
|
12,177
|
$
|
37,358
|
$
|
31,318
|
|||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
320
|
90
|
596
|
354
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on interest rate swaps
|
(202
|
)
|
(344
|
)
|
(301
|
)
|
(134
|
)
|
|||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
14,174
|
$
|
11,923
|
$
|
37,653
|
$
|
31,538
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income is comprised of minimum pension liability of $(1.0)
million, net of taxes of $(0.7) million, as of September 29, 2007 and December
30, 2006, foreign currency translation adjustments of $1.5 million as of
September 29, 2007 and $0.9 million as of December 30, 2006, and an unrealized
gain on interest rate swaps of $0.3 million, net of taxes of $0.2 million,
as of
September 29, 2007 and $0.6 million, net of taxes of $0.4 million, as of
December 30, 2006.
10
7)
|
Inventories
|
Inventories
are composed of material, labor and overhead and are stated at the lower of
cost
or market. Costs for inventory at two of the company's manufacturing facilities
have been determined using the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. These
inventories under the LIFO method amounted to $14.1 million at September 29,
2007 and $16.9 million at December 30, 2006 and represented approximately 21%
and 36% of the total inventory in each respective period. Costs for all other
inventory have been determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method.
The company estimates reserves for inventory obsolescence and shrinkage based
on
its judgment of future realization. Inventories at September 29, 2007 and
December 30, 2006 are as follows:
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Dec.
30, 2006
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Raw
materials and parts
|
$
|
24,285
|
$
|
15,795
|
|||
Work-in-process
|
13,440
|
6,642
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
31,773
|
25,127
|
|||||
69,498
|
47,564
|
||||||
LIFO
adjustment
|
(1,172
|
)
|
(272
|
)
|
|||
$
|
68,326
|
$
|
47,292
|
8)
|
Accrued
Expenses
|
Accrued
expenses consist of the following:
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Dec,
30, 2006
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Accrued
payroll and related expenses
|
$
|
18,010
|
$
|
16,564
|
|||
Accrued
customer rebates
|
13,383
|
13,119
|
|||||
Accrued
warranty
|
12,453
|
11,292
|
|||||
Advance
customer deposits
|
7,217
|
3,615
|
|||||
Accrued
product liability and workers comp
|
6,425
|
4,361
|
|||||
Accrued
commissions
|
4,696
|
2,471
|
|||||
Accrued
professional services
|
3,159
|
2,523
|
|||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
18,893
|
15,691
|
|||||
$
|
84,236
|
$
|
69,636
|
11
9) |
Warranty
Costs
|
In
the
normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific
product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period
in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on
contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically
adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts
that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from
amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made
as
changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
A
rollforward of the warranty reserve is as follows:
Nine Months Ended
|
||||
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
|||
|
(in thousands)
|
|||
Beginning
balance
|
$
|
11,292
|
||
Warranty
reserve related to acquisitions
|
1,454
|
|||
Warranty
expense
|
7,344
|
|||
Warranty
claims
|
(7,637
|
)
|
||
Ending
balance
|
$
|
12,453
|
10) |
Financing
Arrangements
|
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Dec.
30, 2006
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Senior
secured revolving credit line
|
$
|
66,850
|
$
|
30,100
|
|||
Senior
secured bank term loans
|
36,250
|
47,500
|
|||||
Foreign
loan
|
4,748
|
5,202
|
|||||
Total
debt
|
$
|
107,848
|
$
|
82,802
|
|||
Less:
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
16,765
|
16,838
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
$
|
91,083
|
$
|
65,964
|
During
the fourth quarter of 2005, the company amended its senior secured credit
facility. Terms of the agreement currently provide for $36.3 million of term
loans and $130.0 million of availability under a revolving credit line. As
of
September 29, 2007, the company had $103.1 million outstanding under its senior
banking facility, including $66.8 million of borrowings under the revolving
credit line. The company also had $5.1 million in outstanding letters of credit,
which reduced the borrowing availability under the revolving credit
line.
Borrowings
under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate of
1.0% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate
and
the Federal Funds Rate for short term borrowings. At September 29, 2007, the
average interest rate on the senior debt amounted to 6.46%. The interest rates
on borrowings under the senior bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based
on
the company’s defined indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis.
Additionally, a commitment fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged
on
the unused portion of the revolving credit line. This variable commitment fee
amounted to 0.20% as of September 29, 2007.
12
In
August
2006, the company completed its acquisition of Houno in Denmark. This
acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt facilities with
borrowings in Danish Krone. As of September 29, 2007, these facilities
amounted to $4.7 million in U.S. dollars, including $1.6 million outstanding
under a revolving credit facility, $2.2 million of a term loan and $0.9 million
of a long term mortgage note. The interest rate on the revolving credit
facility is assessed at 1.25% above Euro LIBOR, which amounted to 5.65% on
September 29, 2007. The term loan matures in 2013 and the interest rate is
assessed at 5.62%. The long-term mortgage note matures in March 2023 and is
assessed interest at a fixed rate of 5.19%.
In
December 2005, the company entered into a $3.2 million U.S. dollar secured
term
loan at its subsidiary in Spain. As of September 29, 2007, the company had
fully
repaid the borrowings under this loan.
The
company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. In January 2005,
the
company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount
of
$70.0 million. This agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate of 3.78%.
The notional amount amortizes consistent with the repayment schedule of the
company's term loan maturing November 2009. The unamortized notional amount
of
this swap as of September 29, 2007 was $36.3 million. In January 2006, the
company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount
of
$10.0 million maturing on December 21, 2009. This agreement swaps one-month
LIBOR for a fixed rate of 5.03%.
The
terms
of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital
expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, certain ratios of
indebtedness and fixed charge coverage. The credit agreement also provides
that
if a material adverse change in the company’s business operations or conditions
occurs, the lender could declare an event of default. Under terms of the
agreement a material adverse effect is defined as (a) a material adverse change
in, or a material adverse effect upon, the operations, business properties,
condition (financial and otherwise) or prospects of the company and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the ability of
the
company to perform under the loan agreements and to avoid any event of default;
or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect
or
enforceability against the company of any loan document. A material adverse
effect is determined on a subjective basis by the company's creditors. At
September 29, 2007, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant
to
its borrowing agreements.
11) |
Financial
Instruments
|
In
June
1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and
Hedging Activities". SFAS No. 133, as amended, establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments. The statement requires an entity
to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure those
instruments at fair value. Derivatives that do not qualify as a hedge must
be
adjusted to fair value in earnings. If the derivative does qualify as a hedge
under SFAS No. 133, changes in the fair value will either be offset against
the
change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments
or
recognized in other accumulated comprehensive income until the hedged item
is
recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a hedge's change in fair
value will be immediately recognized in earnings.
13
Foreign
Exchange:
The
company has entered into derivative instruments, principally forward contracts
to reduce exposures pertaining to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. As
of
September 29, 2007 the company had no forward contracts
outstanding.
Interest
Rate:
In
January 2005, the company entered into an interest rate swap with a notional
amount of $70.0 million to fix the interest rate applicable to certain of its
variable-rate debt. The notional amount of the swap amortizes consistent with
the repayment schedule of the company's senior term loan maturing in November
2009. As of September 29, 2007, the unamortized balance of the interest rate
swap was $36.3 million. The agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate
of
3.78% and is in effect through November 2009. The company designated the swap
as
a cash flow hedge at its inception and all changes in the fair value of the
swap
are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of September 29,
2007, the fair value of this instrument was $0.4 million. The change in fair
value of this swap agreement in the first nine months of 2007 was a loss of
$0.4
million, net of taxes.
In
January 2006, the company entered into another interest rate swap with a
notional amount of $10.0 million to fix the interest rate applicable to certain
of its variable-rate debt. The agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed
rate
of 5.03% and is in effect through December 2009. The company designated the
swap
a cash flow hedge at is inception and all changes in fair value of the swap
are
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of September 29, 2007,
the fair value of this instrument was $0.1 million. The change in fair value
of
this swap agreement in the first nine months of 2007 was a gain of $0.1 million,
net of taxes.
12) |
Segment
Information
|
The
company operates in three reportable operating segments defined by management
reporting structure and operating activities.
The
Commercial Foodservice Equipment business group manufactures cooking equipment
for the restaurant and institutional kitchen industry. This business segment
has
manufacturing facilities in California, Illinois, Michigan, Nevada, New
Hampshire, North Carolina, Vermont, Denmark and the Philippines. The
Commercial Foodservice Equipment group manufactures conveyor ovens, convection
ovens, fryers, ranges, toasters, combi ovens, steamers, broilers, deck ovens,
baking ovens, proofers, beverage systems and beverage dispensing equipment,
counter-top cooking and warming equipment. This business segment’s principal
product lines include Middleby Marshall® and CTX® conveyor oven equipment,
Blodgett® convection ovens, conveyor ovens, deck oven equipment, Blodgett Combi®
cooking equipment, Blodgett Range® ranges, Nu-Vu® baking ovens and proofers,
Pitco Frialator® fryer equipment, Southbend® ranges, convection ovens and
heavy-duty cooking equipment, Toastmaster® toasters and counterline cooking and
warming equipment, Jade Range® ranges and ovens, Carter Hoffmann® warming,
holding and transporting equipment, Bloomfield® beverage systems and beverage
dispensing equipment, Wells® convection
ovens, counterline cooking equipment and ventless cooking systems,
Houno®
combi-ovens and baking ovens and MagiKitch'n® charbroilers and catering
equipment.
The
Food
Processing Equipment business group manufactures cooking and packaging equipment
for the food processing industry. This business segment has manufacturing
facilities in Georgia and Wisconsin. Its principal products include
Alkar®
batch
ovens, conveyorized ovens and continuous process ovens, RapidPak®
food
packaging machinery and MP Equipment®
breading, battering, mixing, forming, and slicing equipment.
14
The
International Distribution Division provides integrated sales, export
management, distribution and installation services through its operations in
China, India, Lebanon, Mexico, the Philippines, Russia, South Korea, Spain,
Sweden, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The division sells the company’s product
lines and certain non-competing complementary product lines throughout the
world. For a local country distributor or dealer, the company is able to provide
a centralized source of foodservice equipment with complete export management
and product support services.
The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. The chief decision maker evaluates
individual segment performance based on operating income. Management believes
that intersegment sales are made at established arms-length transfer
prices.
Net
Sales Summary
(dollars
in thousands)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||
Business
Divisions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice
|
$
|
109,667
|
80.6
|
$
|
81,500
|
78.9
|
290,597
|
81.9
|
243,940
|
80.0
|
|||||||||||||||
Food
Processing
|
20,780
|
15.3
|
15,389
|
14.9
|
46,329
|
13.0
|
43,909
|
14.4
|
|||||||||||||||||
International
Distribution(1)
|
15,059
|
11.1
|
14,023
|
13.6
|
43,156
|
12.2
|
41,602
|
13.6
|
|||||||||||||||||
Intercompany
sales (2)
|
(9,510
|
)
|
(7.0
|
)
|
(7,673
|
)
|
(7.4
|
)
|
(25,143
|
)
|
(7.1
|
)
|
(24,614
|
)
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
135,996
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
103,239
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
354,939
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
304,837
|
100.0
|
%
|
(1)
|
Consists
of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products manufactured
by
third parties.
|
(2)
|
Represents
the elimination of sales from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group
to the International Distribution Division.
|
15
The
following table summarizes the results of operations for the company's business
segments(1)(in
thousands):
Commercial
|
Food
|
International
|
Corporate
|
||||||||||||||||
Foodservice
|
Processing
|
Distribution
|
and
Other(2)
|
Eliminations(3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
Three
months ended September 29, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
109,667
|
$
|
20,780
|
$
|
15,059
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(9,510
|
)
|
$
|
135,996
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
25,155
|
4,009
|
1,245
|
(5,267
|
)
|
282
|
25,424
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
898
|
131
|
41
|
36
|
—
|
1,106
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
508
|
53
|
52
|
7
|
—
|
620
|
|||||||||||||
Nine
months ended September 29, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
290,597
|
$
|
46,329
|
$
|
43,156
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(25,143
|
)
|
$
|
354,939
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
69,234
|
10,026
|
3,227
|
(17,748
|
)
|
693
|
65,432
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
2,401
|
381
|
125
|
109
|
—
|
3,016
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
1,436
|
65
|
107
|
81
|
—
|
1,689
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
280,999
|
73,931
|
28,741
|
11,741
|
(8,116
|
)
|
387,296
|
||||||||||||
Long-lived
assets(4)
|
166,241
|
43,948
|
456
|
10,430
|
—
|
221,075
|
|||||||||||||
Three
months ended September 30, 2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
81,500
|
$
|
15,389
|
$
|
14,023
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(7,673
|
)
|
$
|
103,239
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
22,032
|
3,302
|
694
|
(5,150
|
)
|
143
|
21,021
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
657
|
132
|
63
|
32
|
—
|
884
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
291
|
6
|
51
|
3
|
—
|
351
|
|||||||||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
243,940
|
$
|
43,909
|
$
|
41,602
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(24,614
|
)
|
$
|
304,837
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
64,205
|
5,866
|
2,558
|
(15,629
|
)
|
(552
|
)
|
56,448
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
2,020
|
408
|
133
|
30
|
—
|
2,591
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
734
|
101
|
99
|
302
|
—
|
1,236
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
206,447
|
48,318
|
26,960
|
7,856
|
(6,119
|
)
|
283,462
|
||||||||||||
Long-lived
assets(4)
|
130,382
|
25,964
|
486
|
9,801
|
—
|
166,633
|
(1)
|
Non-operating
expenses are not allocated to the operating segments. Non-operating
expenses consist of interest expense and deferred financing amortization,
foreign exchange gains and losses and other income and expenses
items
outside of income from operations.
|
(2)
|
Includes
corporate and other general company assets and
operations.
|
(3)
|
Includes
elimination of intercompany sales, profit in inventory and intercompany
receivables. Intercompany sale transactions are predominantly from
the
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International Distribution
Division.
|
(4)
|
Long-lived
assets of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group includes assets
located in the Philippines which amounted to $1,937 and $2,009
in 2007 and
2006, respectively and assets located in Denmark which amounted
to $1,645
in 2007 and $1,688 in 2006 .
|
16
Net
sales
by major geographic region, including those sales from the Commercial
Foodservice Equipment Group direct to international customers, were as follows
(in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
Sep.
29, 2007
|
Sep.
30, 2006
|
||||||||||
United
States and Canada
|
$
|
109,291
|
$
|
84,035
|
$
|
286,832
|
$
|
248,802
|
|||||
Asia
|
10,003
|
5,932
|
2,645
|
19,488
|
|||||||||
Europe
and Middle East
|
11,994
|
9,028
|
35,266
|
23,770
|
|||||||||
Latin
America
|
4,708
|
4,244
|
11,196
|
12,777
|
|||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
135,996
|
$
|
103,239
|
$
|
354,939
|
$
|
304,837
|
13) |
Employee
Retirement Plans
|
(a) Pension
Plans
The
company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit plan for its union
employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility. Benefits are determined based
upon
retirement age and years of service with the company. This defined benefit
plan
was frozen on April 30, 2002 and no further benefits accrue to the participants
beyond this date. Plan participants will receive or continue to receive payments
for benefits earned on or prior to April 30, 2002 upon reaching retirement
age.
The employees participating in the defined benefit plan were enrolled in
a newly
established 401K savings plan on September 30, 2002, further described below.
The
company also maintains a retirement benefit agreement with its Chairman.
The
retirement benefits are based upon a percentage of the Chairman’s final base
salary. Additionally, the company maintains a retirement plan for non-employee
directors. The plan provides for an annual benefit upon a change in control
of
the company or retirement from the Board of Directors at age 70, equal to
100%
of the director’s last annual retainer, payable for a number of years equal to
the director’s years of service up to a maximum of 10 years.
Contributions
under the union plan are funded in accordance with provisions of The Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Expected contributions to be made
in
2007 are $46,000, of which $46,000 was funded during the nine-month period
ended
September 29, 2007. Contributions to the directors' plan are based upon actual
retirement benefits as they retire.
(b) 401K
Savings Plans
The
company maintains two separate defined contribution 401K savings plans covering
all employees in the United States. These two plans separately cover the
union
employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility and all other remaining union and
non-union employees in the United States. The company makes profit sharing
contributions to the various plans in accordance with the requirements of
the
plan. Profit sharing contributions for the Elgin Union 401K savings plans
are
made in accordance with the agreement.
17
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations.
Informational
Note
This
report contains forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor created
by
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company cautions
readers that these projections are based upon future results or events and
are
highly dependent upon a variety of important factors which could cause such
results or events to differ materially from any forward-looking statements
which
may be deemed to have been made in this report, or which are otherwise made
by
or on behalf of the company. Such factors include, but are not limited to,
volatility in earnings resulting from goodwill impairment losses which may
occur
irregularly and in varying amounts; variability in financing costs; quarterly
variations in operating results; dependence on key customers; international
exposure; foreign exchange and political risks affecting international sales;
ability to protect trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property;
changing market conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing;
the
timely development and market acceptance of the company’s products; the
availability and cost of raw materials; and other risks detailed herein and
from
time-to-time in the company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings,
including the company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
18
Net
Sales Summary
(dollars
in thousands)
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sep. 29, 2007
|
Sep. 30, 2006
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
Sep. 30, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||
Business
Divisions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice
|
$
|
109,667
|
80.6
|
$
|
81,500
|
78.9
|
290,597
|
81.9
|
243,940
|
80.0
|
|||||||||||||||
Food
Processing
|
20,780
|
15.3
|
15,389
|
14.9
|
46,329
|
13.0
|
43,909
|
14.4
|
|||||||||||||||||
International
Distribution(1)
|
15,059
|
11.1
|
14,023
|
13.6
|
43,156
|
12.2
|
41,602
|
13.6
|
|||||||||||||||||
Intercompany
sales (2)
|
(9,510
|
)
|
(7.0
|
)
|
(7,673
|
)
|
(7.4
|
)
|
(25,143
|
)
|
(7.1
|
)
|
(24,614
|
)
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
135,996
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
103,239
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
354,939
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
304,837
|
100.0
|
%
|
(1) |
Consists
of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products
manufactured
by third parties.
|
(2) |
Represents
the elimination of sales from
the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International
Distribution Division.
|
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of earnings items
as
a percentage of net sales for the periods.
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep. 29, 2007
|
Sep. 30, 2006
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
Sep. 30, 2006
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
62.2
|
60.7
|
61.3
|
61.3
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
37.8
|
39.3
|
38.7
|
38.7
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
19.1
|
18.9
|
20.3
|
20.2
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
18.7
|
20.4
|
18.4
|
18.5
|
|||||||||
Net
interest expense and deferred financing amortization
|
1.2
|
1.6
|
1.2
|
1.8
|
|||||||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
(0.2
|
)
|
–
|
(0.3
|
)
|
–
|
|||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
17.7
|
18.8
|
17.5
|
16.7
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
7.4
|
7.0
|
7.0
|
6.4
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
10.3
|
%
|
11.8
|
%
|
10.5
|
%
|
10.3
|
%
|
19
Three
Months Ended September 29, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended
September
30, 2006
NET
SALES. Net
sales
for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 were $136.0 million as compared to $103.2
million in the third quarter of 2006.
Net
sales
at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group amounted to $111.4 million in
the
third quarter of 2007 as compared to $82.6 million in the prior year quarter.
Net
sales
from the acquisitions of Houno, Jade, Carter-Hoffmann and Wells Bloomfield
which
were acquired on August 31, 2006. April 1, 2007, June 29, 2007 and August 3,
2007 respectively, accounted for an increase of $21.8 million during the third
quarter of 2007.
Net
sales
of conveyor ovens were $0.4 million lower than the prior year third quarter
due
to a work stoppage that occurred at the Elgin, Illinois production facility
that
began on May 17, 2007 after the unionized workforce failed to ratify a final
contract proposal of an expired collective bargaining agreement. On July
30, 2007, the company announced it had entered into a new collective bargaining
agreement with its Elgin, Illinois unionized workforce bringing an end to the
work stoppage.
Excluding
the impact of acquisitions and the sales of conveyor ovens impacted by the
work
stoppage, net sales of commercial foodservice equipment increased $6.4 million
driven by increased sales of combi-ovens, convection ovens, and ranges,
reflecting the impact of new product introductions and price
increases.
Net
sales
for the Food Processing Equipment Group amounted to $20.8 million in the third
quarter of 2007 as compared to $15.4 million in the prior year quarter. Net
sales of MP Equipment, which was acquired on July 2, 2007, accounted for an
increase of $6.6 million. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, net sales of
food processing equipment decreased $1.6 million due to acquisition integration
initiatives put in place to eliminate low margin and unprofitable
sales.
Net
sales
at the International Distribution Division increased by $1.0 million to $15.1
million, reflecting higher sales in Asia, Europe and Latin America.
GROSS
PROFIT. Gross
profit increased to $51.4 million in the third quarter of 2007 from $40.6
million in the prior year period, reflecting the impact of higher sales volumes.
The gross margin rate was 37.8% in the third quarter of 2007 as compared to
39.3% in the prior year quarter. The net decrease in the gross margin rate
reflects:
·
|
Lower
margins at the Elgin, Illinois manufacturing facility which was adversely
impacted by the work stoppage.
|
·
|
The
adverse impact of steel costs which have risen significantly from
the
prior year quarter.
|
·
|
Lower
margins the newly acquired Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, MP Equipment and
Wells
Bloomfield operations which are in the process of being integrated
within
the company.
|
20
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined
selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $19.6 million
in
the third quarter of 2006 to $26.0 million in the third quarter of 2007. As
a
percentage of net sales, operating expenses increased from 18.9% in the third
quarter of 2006 to 19.1% in the third quarter of 2007. Selling expenses
increased from $10.0 million in the third quarter of 2006 to $13.5 million
in
the third quarter of 2007, reflecting $3.1 million of incremental costs
associated with the acquisitions of Houno, completed in August 2006, Jade
completed on April 1, 2007, Carter-Hoffmann, completed June 29, 2007, MP
Equipment, completed July 2, 2007 and Wells Bloomfield, completed August 3,
2007. General and administrative expenses increased from $9.5 million in the
third quarter of 2006 to $12.5 million in the third quarter of 2007. General
and
administrative expenses reflects $2.1 million of costs associated with the
acquired operations of Houno, Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, MP Equipment and Wells
Bloomfield. Increased general and administrative costs also include increased
incentive compensation costs.
NON-OPERATING
EXPENSES. Interest
and deferred financing amortization costs of $1.6 million in the third quarter
of 2007 remained consistent with the third quarter of 2006, as the benefit
of
lower debt balances was offset in part by higher interest rates. Other income
of
$0.3 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared favorably to other income
of
less than $0.1 million in the prior year third quarter and was comprised
primarily of foreign exchange gains.
INCOME
TAXES. A
tax
provision of $10.1 million, at an effective rate of 42%, was recorded during
the
third quarter of 2007, as compared to a $7.3 million provision at a 37%
effective rate in the prior year quarter. The 2007 third quarter provision
included increased reserves for state tax audits and exposures.
Nine
Months Ended September 29, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2006
NET
SALES. Net
sales
for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007 were $354.9 million as
compared to $304.8 in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.
Net
sales
at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group amounted to $295.0 million in
the
nine-month period ended September 29, 2007 as compared to $247.7 million in
the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.
Net
sales
from the acquisitions of Houno, Jade, Carter-Hoffmann and Wells Bloomfield
which
were acquired on August 31, 2006, April 1, 2007, June 29, 2007 and August 3,
2007 respectively, accounted for an increase of $32.7 million during the first
nine months of 2007.
Net
sales
of conveyor ovens increased $0.8 million in the nine-month period ended
September 29, 2007 as compared to the nine-month period ended September 30,
2006. Net
sales
of conveyor ovens had increased $4.5 million in the first quarter of 2007 as
compared to the 2006 first quarter due to increased sales of new product, and
decreased $3.7 million in the combined second and third quarters due to a work
stoppage that occurred at the Elgin, Illinois production facility that began
on
May 17, 2007 after the unionized workforce failed to ratify a final contract
proposal of an expired collective bargaining agreement. On July 30, 2007,
subsequent to the end of the second quarter the company announced it had entered
into a new collective bargaining agreement with its Elgin, Illinois unionized
workforce bringing an end to the work stoppage.
21
Excluding
the impact of acquisitions and the decrease in sales of conveyor ovens impacted
by the work stoppage, net sales of commercial foodservice equipment increased
$26.7 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007 compared to
the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. The net increase includes
increased sales of combi-ovens, convection ovens, fryers and ranges, reflecting
the impact of new product introductions and price increases.
Net
sales
for the Food Processing Equipment Group amounted to $46.3 million for the
nine-month period ended September 29, 2007 as compared to $43.9 million for
the
prior year period. Net sales of MP Equipment, which was acquired on July 2,
2007, accounted for an increase of $6.6 million. Excluding the impact of
acquisitions, net sales of food processing equipment decreased $4.2 million
due
to acquisition integration initiatives put in place to eliminate low margin
and
unprofitable sales.
Net
sales
at the International Distribution Division increased from $41.6 million for
the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 to $43.2 million for the nine-month
period ended September 29, 2007, reflecting higher sales in Europe and Asia,
which more than offset a decline in sales in Mexico. International sales
benefited from expansion of the U.S. chains overseas and increased business
with
local and regional restaurant chains in developing markets.
GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased to $137.4 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007 from $117.81 million in the nine-month period, ended September 30, 2006, reflecting the impact of higher sales volumes. The gross margin rate was 38.7% for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007 and remained consistent with the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. The gross margin rate reflects:
·
|
Lower
margins at the Elgin, Illinois manufacturing facility which was adversely
impacted by the work stoppage.
|
·
|
The
adverse impact of steel costs which have risen significantly from
the
prior year quarter.
|
·
|
Lower
margins at the newly acquired Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, MP Equipment
and
Wells Bloomfield operations which are in the process of being integrated
within the company.
|
·
|
Improved
margins at the Food Processing Equipment Group, which was acquired
in
December 2005, resulting from cost reduction initiatives and elimination
of unprofitable sales.
|
·
|
Increased
sales volumes that benefited manufacturing efficiencies and provided
for
greater leverage of fixed manufacturing
costs.
|
·
|
Higher
margins associated with new product
sales.
|
22
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined
selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $61.4 million
in
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 to $72.0 million in the
nine-month period ended September 29, 2007. As a percentage of net sales,
operating expenses increased from 20.2% in the nine-month period ended September
30, 2006, to 20.3% in the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007. Selling
expenses increased from $30.9 million in the nine-month period ended September
30, 2006, to $36.6 million in the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007,
reflecting $4.6 million of increased costs associated with the newly acquired
operations of Houno, Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, MP Equipment and Wells Bloomfield
and $1.3 million of higher commission costs associated with the increased sales
volumes. General and administrative expenses increased from $30.5 million in
the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, to $35.4 million in the nine-month
period ended September 29, 2007, which includes increased costs of $2.9 million
associated with the newly acquired operations of Houno, Jade, Carter-Hoffmann,
MP Equipment and Wells Bloomfield. General and administrative expenses also
includes increased employee incentive performance costs.
NON-OPERATING
EXPENSES. Interest
and deferred financing amortization costs decreased to $4.1 million for the
nine-month period ended September 29, 2007 from $5.4 million in the prior year
period, as the benefit of lower debt balances were offset in part by higher
interest rates. Other income was $1.1 million for the nine-month period ended
September 29, 2007, which primarily consisted of foreign exchange gains,
compared to other expense of less than $0.1 million for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2006.
INCOME
TAXES. A
tax
provision of $25.0 million, at an effective rate of 40%, was recorded for the
first nine months of 2007 as compared to a $19.6 million provision at a 39%
effective rate in the prior year period.
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
During
the nine months ended September 29, 2007, cash and cash equivalents increased
by
$4.1 million to $7.6 million at September 29, 2007 from $3.5 million at December
30, 2006. Net borrowings increased from $82.8 million at December 30, 2006
to
$107.8 million at September 29, 2007.
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES. Net
cash
provided operating activities was $46.0 million for the nine-month period ended
September 29, 2007 compared to $33.4 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006.
During
the nine months ended September 29, 2007, working capital levels increased
due
to the higher sales volumes and increased seasonal working capital needs. The
changes in working capital included a $5.7 increase in accounts receivable,
a
$3.0 million increase in inventory, a $4.6 million increase in prepaid expenses
and other assets, a $6.9 million increase in accounts payable and a $3.2 million
increase in accrued expenses and non-current liabilities.
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES. During
the nine months ended September 29, 2007, net cash used in investing activities
amounted to $69.8 million. This includes $0.2 million associated with the
acquisition of Houno, $7.8
million associated with the acquisition of Jade, $16.2 million associated with
the acquisition of Carter-Hoffmann, $15.2 million associated with the
acquisition of MP Equipment, $28.8 million associated with the acquisition
of
Wells Bloomfield and $1.7 million of capital expenditures associated with
additions and upgrades of production and marketing equipment.
23
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES. Net
cash
flows provided by financing activities were $27.8 million during the nine months
ended September 29, 2007. The net increase in debt includes $36.8 million in
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, $11.3 million of repayments
of
the company’s term loan and $0.8 million of repayments of foreign bank loans.
The company also received $3.1 million of net proceeds from the exercise of
employee stock options.
At
September 29, 2007, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant
to
its borrowing agreements. Management believes that future cash flows from
operating activities and borrowing availability under the revolving credit
facility will provide the company with sufficient financial resources to meet
its anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and
debt
amortization for the foreseeable future.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value
measurements. This statement is effective for interim reporting periods in
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company will apply this
guidance prospectively. The company is continuing its process of determining
what impact the application of this guidance will have on the company's
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”. One provision of SFAS No. 158 requires the
measurement of the company’s defined benefit plan’s assets and its obligation to
determine the funded status be made as of the end of the fiscal year. This
provision of SFAS No. 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after December
15, 2008. The company does not anticipate that the impact from the adoption
of
this provision of SFAS No. 158 will be significant to its financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement
is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company will
apply this guidance prospectively. The company is continuing its process of
determining what impact the application of this guidance will have on the
company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
24
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are
based upon the company's consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the
company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related disclosures.
On an
ongoing basis, the company evaluates its estimates and judgments based on
historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Property
and equipment: Property
and equipment are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their
useful lives based on management's estimates of the period over which the assets
will be utilized to benefit the operations of the company. The useful lives
are
estimated based on historical experience with similar assets, taking into
account anticipated technological or other changes. The company
periodically reviews these lives relative to physical factors, economic factors
and industry trends. If there are changes in the planned use of property and
equipment or if technological changes were to occur more rapidly than
anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened,
resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense
in future periods.
Long-lived
assets: Long-lived
assets (including goodwill and other intangibles) are reviewed for impairment
annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the
recoverability of the company's long-lived assets, the company considers changes
in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash
flows and other factors. Estimates of future cash flows are judgments
based on the company's experience and knowledge of operations. These
estimates can be significantly impacted by many factors including changes in
global and local business and economic conditions, operating costs, inflation,
competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the company's
estimates or the underlying assumptions change in the future, the company may
be
required to record impairment charges.
Warranty: In
the
normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific
product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period
in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on
contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically
adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts
that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from
amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made
as
changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
Litigation: From
time
to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The
company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers
compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The
company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or
outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses.
A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these
contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance
coverage. The reserve requirements may change in the future due to new
developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy
in
dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or
results of operations.
25
Income
taxes: The
company operates in numerous foreign and domestic taxing jurisdictions where
it
is subject to various types of tax, including sales tax and income tax.
The company's tax filings are subject to audits and adjustments. Because of
the
nature of the company’s operations, the nature of the audit items can be
complex, and the objectives of the government auditors can result in a tax
on
the same transaction or income in more than one state or country. The
company initially recognizes the financial statement effects of a tax position
when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the
position will be sustained upon examination. For tax positions that meet the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the company initially and
subsequently measures it tax positions as the largest amount of tax benefit
that
is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon effective settlement
with a taxing authority. As part of the company’s calculation of the provision
for taxes, the company has recorded liabilities on various tax positions that
are currently under audit by the taxing authorities. The liabilities may change
in the future upon effective settlement of the tax positions.
Contractual
Obligations
The
company's contractual cash payment obligations as of September 29, 2007 are
set
forth below (in thousands):
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Deferred
|
Idle
|
Contractual
|
||||||||||||||
Acquisition
|
Long-term
|
Operating
|
Facility
|
Cash
|
||||||||||||
Costs
|
Debt
|
Leases
|
Leases
|
Obligations
|
||||||||||||
Less
than 1 year
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
16,765
|
$
|
2,271
|
$
|
336
|
$
|
19,372
|
||||||
1-3
years
|
2,000
|
88,307
|
3,434
|
766
|
94,507
|
|||||||||||
3-5
years
|
—
|
111
|
785
|
882
|
1,778
|
|||||||||||
After
5 years
|
—
|
2,665
|
—
|
1,289
|
3,954
|
|||||||||||
$
|
2,000
|
$
|
107,848
|
$
|
6,490
|
$
|
3,273
|
$
|
119,611
|
Idle
facility leases consists of an obligation for a manufacturing location that
was
exited in conjunction with the company's manufacturing consolidation efforts.
This lease obligation continues through December 2014. This facility has been
subleased. The obligation presented above does not reflect any anticipated
sublease income from the facilities.
The
projected benefit obligation of the company’s defined benefit plans exceeded the
plans’ assets by $3.5 million at the end of 2006 as compared to $2.4 million at
the end of 2005. The unfunded benefit obligations were comprised of a $0.7
million under funding of the company's union plan and $2.8 million of under
funding of the company's director plans. The company does not expect to
contribute to the director plans in 2007. The company made minimum contributions
required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) of
$0.2 million in 2006 to the company's union plan. The company expects to
continue to make minimum contributions of $0.2 million in 2007 to the union
plan
as required by ERISA.
The
company has $5.1 million in outstanding letters of credit, which expire on
September 29, 2008 with an automatic one-year renewal, to secure potential
obligations under insurance programs.
26
The
company places purchase orders with its suppliers in the ordinary course of
business. These purchase orders are generally to fulfill short-term
manufacturing requirements of less than 90 days and most are cancelable with
a
restocking penalty. The company has no long-term purchase contracts or minimum
purchase obligations with any supplier.
The
company has contractual obligations under its various debt agreements to make
interest payments. These amounts are subject to the level of borrowings in
future periods and the interest rate for the applicable periods, and therefore
the amounts of these payments is not determinable.
The
company has no activities, obligations or exposures associated with off-balance
sheet arrangements.
27
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
The
company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. The
following table summarizes the maturity of the company’s debt
obligations.
Fixed
|
Variable
|
||||||
Rate
|
Rate
|
||||||
Twelve
Month Period Ending
|
Debt
|
Debt
|
|||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
September
29, 2008
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
16,765
|
|||
September
29, 2009
|
—
|
16,976
|
|||||
September
29, 2010
|
—
|
71,331
|
|||||
September
29, 2011
|
—
|
111
|
|||||
September
29, 2012
|
862
|
1,803
|
|||||
$
|
862
|
$
|
106,986
|
During
the fourth quarter of 2005, the company amended its senior secured credit
facility. Terms of the agreement currently provide for $36 million of term
loans
and $130.0 million of availability under a revolving credit line. As of
September 29, 2007, the company had $103.1 million outstanding under its senior
banking facility, including $66.8 million of borrowings under the revolving
credit line. The company also had $5.1 million in outstanding letters of credit,
which reduced the borrowing availability under the revolving credit
line.
Borrowings
under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate of
1.00% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate
and the Federal Funds Rate for short-term borrowings. At September 29, 2007,
the
average interest rate on the senior debt amounted to 6.46%. The interest rates
on borrowings under the senior bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based
on
the company’s defined indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis.
Additionally, a commitment fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged
on
the unused portion of the revolving credit line. This variable commitment fee
amounted to 0.20% as of September 29, 2007.
In
August
2006, the company completed its acquisition of Houno in Denmark. This
acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt facilities with
borrowings in Danish Krone. As of September 29, 2007 these facilities
amounted to $4.7 million in U.S. dollars, including $1.6 million outstanding
under a revolving credit facility, $2.2 million of a term loan and $0.9 million
of a long term mortgage note. The interest rate on the revolving credit
facility is assessed at 1.25% above Euro LIBOR, which amounted to 5.65% on
September 29, 2007. The term loan matures in 2013 and the interest rate is
assessed at 5.62%. The long-term mortgage note matures in March 2023 and
is assessed interest at a fixed rate of 5.19%.
In
December 2005, the company entered into a $3.2 million U.S. dollar secured
term
loan at its subsidiary in Spain. As of September 29, 2007, the company had
fully
repaid the borrowings remaining under this loan.
28
The
company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. In January 2005,
the
company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount
of
$70.0 million. This agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate of 3.78%.
The notional amount amortizes consistent with the repayment schedule of the
company's term loan maturing November 2009. The unamortized notational amount
of
this swap as of September 29, 2007 was $36.3 million. In January 2006, the
company entered into an interest rate swap for a notional amount of $10.0
million maturing on December 31, 2009. This agreement swaps one-month LIBOR
for
a fixed rate of 5.03%.
The
terms
of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital
expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, certain ratios of
indebtedness and fixed charge coverage. The credit agreement also provides
that
if a material adverse change in the company’s business operations or conditions
occurs, the lender could declare an event of default. Under terms of the
agreement a material adverse effect is defined as (a) a material adverse change
in, or a material adverse effect upon, the operations, business properties,
condition (financial and otherwise) or prospects of the company and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the ability of
the
company to perform under the loan agreements and to avoid any event of default;
or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect
or
enforceability against the company of any loan document. A material adverse
effect is determined on a subjective basis by the company's creditors. At
September 29, 2007, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant
to
its borrowing agreements.
Financing
Derivative Instruments
In
January 2005, the company entered into an interest rate swap with a notional
amount of $70.0 million to fix the interest rate applicable to certain of its
variable-rate debt. The notional amount of the swap amortizes consistent with
the repayment schedule of the company's senior term loan maturing in November
2009. The agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate of 3.78% and is
in
effect through November 2009. The interest rate swap has been designated a
cash
flow hedge, and in accordance with SFAS No. 133 the changes in fair value are
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. As of
September 29, 2007, the fair value of this instrument was $0.4 million. The
change in fair value of this swap agreement in the first nine months of 2007
was
a loss of $0.4 million, net of $0.2 million of taxes. In January 2006, the
company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount
of
$10.0 million maturing on December 21, 2009. This agreement swaps one month
LIBOR for a fixed rate of 5.03%. The interest rate swap has been designated
a
cash flow hedge, and in accordance with SFAS No. 133 the changes in fair value
are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. As of
September 29, 2007, the fair value of this instrument was $0.1 million. The
change in fair value of this swap agreement in the first nine months of 2007
was
a gain of $0.1 million, net of less than $0.1 million of taxes.
29
Foreign
Exchange Derivative Financial Instruments
The
company uses foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts with terms
of
less than one year, to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. The company’s primary hedging activities are to mitigate its
exposure to changes in exchange rates on intercompany and third party trade
receivables and payables. The company does not currently enter into derivative
financial instruments for speculative purposes. In managing its foreign currency
exposures, the company identifies and aggregates naturally occurring offsetting
positions and then hedges residual balance sheet exposures. There was no forward
contract outstanding at the end of the quarter.
30
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
The
company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the company's Exchange Act reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to the company's management, including its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
As
of
September 29, 2007, the company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision
and with the participation of the company's management, including the company's
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the
design and operation of the company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on the foregoing, the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the company's
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of this
period.
During
the quarter ended September 29, 2007, there has been no change in the company's
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or
is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting.
31
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
The
company was not required to report the information pursuant to Items 1 through
6
of Part II of Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 29, 2007, except
as
follows:
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes in the risk factors as set forth in the company's
2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
In
July
1998, the company's Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program that
authorized the purchase of common shares in open market purchases. As of
September 29, 2007, 952,999 shares had been purchased under the 1998 stock
repurchase program. No shares were repurchased by the company during the nine
month period ended September 29, 2007.
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibits – |
The
following exhibits are filed
herewith:
|
Exhibit 31.1 – |
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
Exhibit 31.2 – |
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Exhibit 32.1 – |
Certification
by the Principal Executive Officer of The Middleby Corporation Pursuant
to
Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C.
1350).
|
Exhibit 32.2 – |
Certification
by the Principal Financial Officer of The Middleby Corporation Pursuant
to
Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C.
1350).
|
32
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date
November 8, 2007
|
By:
|
/s/
Timothy J. FitzGerald
|
Timothy
J. FitzGerald
|
||
Vice
President,
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
33