MIDDLEBY Corp - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
or
oTransition
Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Commission
File No. 1-9973
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware
|
36-3352497
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
|
1400
Toastmaster Drive, Elgin,
Illinois
|
60120
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
Telephone No., including Area Code (847)
741-3300
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
Accelerated
filer ý
Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
ý
As
of
August 3, 2007, there were 16,590,696 shares of the registrant's common
stock outstanding.
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
INDEX
DESCRIPTION
|
PAGE
|
|||||||||
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||||||||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|||||||||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
1
|
|||||||||
June
30, 2007 and December 30, 2006
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
|
|
2
|
||||||||
June
30, 2007 and July 1, 2006
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
3
|
||||||||
June
30, 2007 and July 1, 2006
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
4
|
|||||||||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
18
|
||||||||
|
||||||||||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
28
|
||||||||
|
||||||||||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
31
|
||||||||
|
||||||||||
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
32
|
||||||||
|
||||||||||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
32
|
||||||||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
32
|
||||||||
|
||||||||||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
33
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
Thousands, Except Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
|
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Dec.
30, 2006
|
|||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
5,791
|
$
|
3,534
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, net of reserve for doubtful
accounts of $5,834 and $5,101
|
56,343
|
51,580
|
|||||
Inventories,
net
|
58,679
|
47,292
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
2,536
|
3,289
|
|||||
Prepaid
taxes
|
342
|
1,129
|
|||||
Current
deferred taxes
|
10,851
|
10,851
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
134,542
|
117,675
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $38,712 and $37,006
|
32,124
|
28,534
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
110,942
|
101,258
|
|||||
Other
intangibles
|
36,200
|
35,306
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
2,113
|
2,249
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
315,921
|
$
|
285,022
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
$
|
16,572
|
$
|
16,838
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
24,122
|
19,689
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
59,114
|
69,636
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
99,808
|
106,163
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
68,856
|
65,964
|
|||||
Long-term
deferred tax liability
|
3,749
|
5,867
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
14,059
|
6,455
|
|||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; nonvoting; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
none
issued
|
--
|
--
|
|||||
Common
stock, $0.005 par value; 47,500,000 shares authorized; 20,445,740
and
19,760,490 shares issued in 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
118
|
117
|
|||||
Paid-in
capital
|
80,774
|
73,743
|
|||||
Treasury
stock at cost; 3,855,044 shares
in 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
(89,641
|
)
|
(89,641
|
)
|
|||
Retained
earnings
|
137,584
|
115,917
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
614
|
437
|
|||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
129,449
|
100,573
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
315,921
|
$
|
285,022
|
See
accompanying notes
1
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
113,248
|
$
|
104,849
|
$
|
218,943
|
$
|
201,598
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
68,362
|
63,122
|
132,952
|
124,347
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
44,886
|
41,727
|
85,991
|
77,251
|
|||||||||
Selling
expenses
|
11,952
|
10,767
|
23,068
|
20,892
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
11,732
|
10,681
|
22,915
|
20,932
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
21,202
|
20,279
|
40,008
|
35,427
|
|||||||||
Net
interest expense and deferred financing amortization
|
1,273
|
2,031
|
2,517
|
3,827
|
|||||||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
(630
|
)
|
165
|
(737
|
)
|
72
|
|||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
20,559
|
18,083
|
38,228
|
31,528
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
7,977
|
6,993
|
14,926
|
12,387
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
12,582
|
$
|
11,090
|
$
|
23,302
|
$
|
19,141
|
|||||
Net
earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.80
|
$
|
0.73
|
$
|
1.50
|
$
|
1.26
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.75
|
$
|
0.67
|
$
|
1.39
|
$
|
1.16
|
|||||
Weighted
average number of shares
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
15,641
|
15,246
|
15,576
|
15,240
|
|||||||||
Dilutive
stock options1,2
|
1,234
|
1,282
|
1,232
|
1,282
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
16,875
|
16,528
|
16,808
|
16,522
|
1 There
were
no anti-dilutive stock options excluded from common stock equivalents for
the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007.
2
There
were
7,000 anti-dilutive stock options excluded from common stock equivalents
in the
three and six months ended July 1, 2006.
See
accompanying notes
2
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
Thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.1,
2006
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities-
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
23,302
|
$
|
19,141
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,747
|
2,433
|
|||||
Deferred
taxes
|
32
|
(244
|
)
|
||||
Non-cash
share-based compensation
|
3,261
|
2,320
|
|||||
Cash
effects of changes in -
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
1,489
|
(9,258
|
)
|
||||
Inventories,
net
|
(2,771
|
)
|
(2,668
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
1,529
|
1,342
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
1,019
|
2,149
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
(8,201
|
)
|
(1,456
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
22,407
|
13,759
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities-
|
|||||||
Net
additions to property and equipment
|
(1,069
|
)
|
(882
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of Alkar
|
--
|
(1,500
|
)
|
||||
Acquisition
of Jade
|
(7,391
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Acquisition
of Carter Hoffmann
|
(15,928
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(24,388
|
)
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities-
|
|||||||
Net
proceeds
(repayments) under revolving credit facilities
|
10,900
|
(5,750
|
)
|
||||
(Repayments)
under senior secured bank notes
|
(7,500
|
)
|
(6,250
|
)
|
|||
(Repayments)
under foreign bank loan
|
(904
|
)
|
(101
|
)
|
|||
(Repayments)
under note agreement
|
--
|
(149
|
)
|
||||
Net
proceeds from stock issuances
|
1,687
|
59
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
4,183
|
(12,191
|
)
|
||||
Effect
of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
55
|
62
|
|||||
Changes
in cash and cash equivalents-
|
|||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
2,257
|
(752
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
3,534
|
3,908
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of quarter
|
$
|
5,791
|
$
|
3,156
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
2,518
|
$
|
3,313
|
|||
Income
tax payments
|
$
|
13,449
|
$
|
5,700
|
See
accompanying notes
3
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
A) Basis
of Presentation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by The Middleby
Corporation (the "company"), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements are unaudited
and
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
such
rules and regulations, although the company believes that the disclosures
are
adequate to make the information not misleading. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes
contained in the company's 2006 Form 10-K.
In
the
opinion of management, the financial statements contain all adjustments
necessary to present fairly the financial position of the company as of June
30,
2007 and December 30, 2006, and the results of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and July 1, 2006 and cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and July 1, 2006.
B) Share-Based
Compensation
Share-based
compensation expense is calculated by estimating the fair value of market
based
stock awards and stock options at the time of grant and amortized over the
stock
options’ vesting period. Share-based compensation expense was $1.9 million and
$1.2 million for the second quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Share-based
compensation was $3.3 million and $2.3 million for the six month periods
ended
June 30, 2007 and July 1, 2006, respectively.
C) Income
Tax Contingencies
In
July
2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). This interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model
for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its
financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or
expects to take on a tax return. FIN 48 states that a tax benefit from an
uncertain tax position may be recognized only if it is “more likely than not”
that the position is sustainable, based on its technical merits. The tax
benefit
of a qualifying position is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater
than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority
having
full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax benefit from an uncertain
position was previously recognized if it was probable of being sustained.
Under
FIN 48, the liability for unrecognized tax benefits is classified as non-current
unless the liability is expected to be settled in cash within 12 months of
the
reporting date. FIN 48 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal
year
beginning after December 15, 2006. The company adopted the provisions of
FIN 48
on the first day of fiscal 2007 (December 31, 2006), as required.
4
The
following table indicates the effect of the application of FIN 48 on individual
line items in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of the adoption date (dollars
in
thousands).
Before
|
After
|
|||||||||
FIN
48
|
Adjustment
|
FIN
48
|
||||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
$
|
69,636
|
$
|
(5,395
|
)
|
$
|
64,241
|
|||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
$
|
6,455
|
$
|
7,030
|
$
|
13,485
|
||||
Retained
earnings
|
$
|
115,917
|
$
|
(1,635
|
)
|
$
|
114,282
|
The
company operates in multiple taxing jurisdictions, both within the United
States
and outside of the United States, and faces audits from various tax authorities
regarding transfer pricing, the deductibility of certain expenses, intercompany
transactions as well as other matters. As of the adoption date, the total
amount
of liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to federal, state and
foreign
taxes was approximately $5.7 million (of which the entire amount would impact
the effective tax rate if recognized) plus approximately $0.5 million of
accrued
interest and $0.8 million of penalties. As of June 30, 2007, the corresponding
balance of liability for unrecognized tax benefits is approximately $5.6
million
plus approximately $0.6 million of accrued interest and $0.8 million of
penalties. The company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related
to
unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense, which is consistent with
reporting in prior periods.
The
company is not currently under examination in any tax jurisdiction; however
it
remains subject to examination until the statute of limitations expires for
the
respective tax jurisdiction. Within specific countries, the company and its
operating subsidiaries may be subject to audit by various tax authorities
and
may be subject to different statute of limitations expiration dates. A summary
of the tax years that remain subject to examination in the company’s major tax
jurisdictions are:
United
States - federal
|
2003
- 2006
|
|||
United
States - states
|
2002
- 2006
|
|||
China
|
2006
|
|||
Denmark
|
2006
|
|||
Mexico
|
2006
|
|||
Philippines
|
2004
- 2006
|
|||
South
Korea
|
2004
- 2006
|
|||
Spain
|
2003
- 2006
|
|||
Taiwan
|
2005
- 2006
|
|||
United
Kingdom
|
2006
|
The
company does not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will
significantly change due to the settlement of audits and the expiration of
statute of limitations prior to June 30, 2008.
5
2) |
Purchase
Accounting
|
Houno
On
August
31, 2006, the company acquired the stock of Houno A/S (“Houno”) located in
Denmark for $4.9 million in cash. The company also assumed $3.7 million of
debt
included as part of the net assets of Houno.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Houno acquisition is summarized
as
follows (in thousands):
Aug.
31, 2006
|
Adjustments
|
Dec.
30, 2006
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
4,325
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
4,325
|
||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
4,371
|
--
|
4,371
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
1,287
|
199
|
1,486
|
|||||||
Other
intangibles
|
1,139
|
(199
|
)
|
940
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
92
|
--
|
92
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,061
|
)
|
--
|
(3,061
|
)
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
(2,858
|
)
|
--
|
(2,858
|
)
|
|||||
Long-term
deferred tax liability
|
(356
|
)
|
--
|
(356
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
4,939
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
4,939
|
The
goodwill is subject to the nonamortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 from
the
date of acquisition. Other intangibles also includes $0.1 million allocated
to
backlog and $0.8 million allocated to developed technology which are amortized
over periods of 1 month and 5 years, respectively. Goodwill and other
intangibles of Houno are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group
for segment reporting purposes. These assets are not deductible for tax
purposes.
Jade
On
April
1, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Jade Products Company (“Jade”), a leading manufacturer of commercial and
residential cooking equipment from Maytag Corporation ("Maytag") for an
aggregate purchase price of $7.4 million in cash. The purchase price is subject
to adjustment based upon a working capital provision within the purchase
agreement.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
6
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Jade acquisition is summarized
as
follows (in thousands):
Apr.
1, 2007
|
||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
6,727
|
||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
2,029
|
|||
Goodwill
|
250
|
|||
Other
intangibles
|
1,590
|
|||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,206
|
)
|
||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
7,391
|
The
goodwill and $1.4 million of other intangibles associated with the Jade
acquisition, which are comprised of the tradename, are subject to the
non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 from the date of acquisition.
Other
intangibles of $0.2 million allocated to customer relationships are to be
amortized over a periods of 10 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of Jade
are
allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting
purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for tax
purposes.
Carter
Hoffmann
On
June
29, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Carter Hoffmann (“Carter Hoffmann”), a leading manufacturer of commercial
cooking and warming equipment from Carrier Commercial Refrigeration
Inc.,
a
subsidiary of Carrier Corporation, which is a unit of United Technologies
Corporation, for
an
aggregate purchase price of $15.9 million in cash. The purchase price is
subject
to adjustment based upon a working capital provision within the purchase
agreement.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Carter Hoffmann acquisition is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
Jun.
29, 2007
|
||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
7,912
|
||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
2,264
|
|||
Goodwill
|
9,452
|
|||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,646
|
)
|
||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(54
|
)
|
||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
15,928
|
The
goodwill associated with the Carter Hoffmann acquisition is subject to the
non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 from the date of acquisition.
Goodwill and other intangibles of Carter Hoffmann are allocated to the
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These
assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
7
3)
|
Stock
Split
|
On
May 3,
2007, the company’s Board of Directors authorized a two-for-one split of the
company’s common stock in the form of a stock dividend. The stock dividend
was paid on June 15, 2007 to company shareholders of record as of June 1,
2007.
The company’s common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on June 18,
2007. All references in the accompanying consolidated condensed financial
statements and notes thereto to net earnings per share and the number of
shares
have been adjusted to reflect this stock split.
4)
|
Litigation
Matters
|
From
time
to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The
company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers
compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The
company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or
outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses.
A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these
contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance
coverage. The reserve requirement may change in the future due to new
developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy
in
dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows of the company.
5)
|
Recently
Issued Accounting
Standards
|
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value
in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about
fair
value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value
measurements. This statement is effective for interim reporting periods in
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company will apply this
guidance prospectively. The company is continuing its process of determining
what impact the application of this guidance will have on the company's
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”. One provision of SFAS No. 158 requires the
measurement of the company’s defined benefit plan’s assets and its obligation to
determine the funded status be made as of the end of the fiscal year. This
provision of SFAS No. 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after December
15, 2008. The company does not anticipate that the impact from the adoption
of
this provision of SFAS No. 158 will be significant to its financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement
is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company
will
apply this guidance prospectively. The company is continuing its process
of
determining what impact the application of this guidance will have on the
company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
8
6)
|
Other
Comprehensive Income
|
The
company reports changes in equity during a period, except those resulting
from
investment by owners and distribution to owners, in accordance with SFAS
No.
130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income."
Components
of other comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
12,582
|
$
|
11,090
|
$
|
23,302
|
$
|
19,141
|
|||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
244
|
318
|
276
|
264
|
|||||||||
Unrecognized
pension benefit cost
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on interest rate swaps
|
37
|
58
|
(99
|
)
|
210
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
12,863
|
$
|
11,466
|
$
|
23,479
|
$
|
19,615
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income is comprised of minimum pension liability of $(1.0)
million, net of taxes of $(0.7) million, as of June 30, 2007 and December
30,
2006, foreign currency translation adjustments of $1.1 million as of June
30,
2007 and $0.9 million as of December 30, 2006 and an unrealized gain on interest
rate swaps of $0.5 million, net of taxes of $0.3 million, as of June 30,
2007
and $0.6 million, net of taxes of $0.4 million as of December 30,
2006.
7)
|
Inventories
|
Inventories
are composed of material, labor and overhead and are stated at the lower
of cost
or market. Costs for inventory at two of the company's manufacturing facilities
have been determined using the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. These
inventories under the LIFO method amounted to $14.5 million at June 30, 2007
and
$16.9 million at December 30, 2006 and represented approximately 25% and
36% of
the total inventory in each respective period. Costs for all other inventory
have been determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. The company
estimates reserves for inventory obsolescence and shrinkage based on its
judgment of future realization. Inventories at June 30, 2007 and December
30,
2006 are as follows:
|
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Dec.
30, 2006
|
|||||
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||
Raw
materials and parts
|
$
|
23,280
|
$
|
15,795
|
|||
Work-in-process
|
9,515
|
6,642
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
26,906
|
25,127
|
|||||
59,701
|
47,564
|
||||||
LIFO
adjustment
|
(1,022
|
)
|
(272
|
)
|
|||
$
|
58,679
|
$
|
47,292
|
9
8)
|
Accrued
Expenses
|
Accrued
expenses consist of the following:
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Dec,
30, 2006
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Accrued
payroll and related expenses
|
$
|
12,444
|
$
|
16,564
|
|||
Accrued
warranty
|
12,182
|
11,292
|
|||||
Accrued
customer rebates
|
8,900
|
13,119
|
|||||
Accrued
product liability and workers comp
|
5,639
|
4,361
|
|||||
Accrued
commissions
|
3,501
|
2,471
|
|||||
Accrued
professional services
|
3,463
|
2,523
|
|||||
Advance
customer deposits
|
2,546
|
3,615
|
|||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
10,439
|
15,691
|
|||||
$
|
59,114
|
$
|
69,636
|
9)
|
Warranty
Costs
|
In
the
normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific
product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the
period
in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on
contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically
adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts
that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ
from
amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made
as
changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
A
rollforward of the warranty reserve is as follows:
Six
Months Ended
|
||||
Jun.
30, 2007
|
||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||
Beginning
balance
|
$
|
11,292
|
||
Warranty
expense
|
5,159
|
|||
Warranty
claims
|
(4,269
|
)
|
||
Ending
balance
|
$
|
12,182
|
10
10)
|
Financing
Arrangements
|
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Dec.
30, 2006
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Senior
secured revolving credit line
|
$
|
41,000
|
$
|
30,100
|
|||
Senior
secured bank term loans
|
40,000
|
47,500
|
|||||
Foreign
loan
|
4,428
|
5,202
|
|||||
Total
debt
|
$
|
85,428
|
$
|
82,802
|
|||
Less:
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
16,572
|
16,838
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
$
|
68,856
|
$
|
65,964
|
During
the fourth quarter of 2005, the company amended its senior secured credit
facility. Terms of the agreement currently provide for $40.0 million of term
loans and $130.0 million of availability under a revolving credit line. As
of
June 30, 2007, the company had $81.0 million outstanding under its senior
banking facility, including $41.0 million of borrowings under the revolving
credit line. The company also had $3.6 million in outstanding letters of
credit,
which reduced the borrowing availability under the revolving credit
line.
Borrowings
under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate
of
1.0% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate
and
the Federal Funds Rate for short term borrowings. At June 30, 2007, the average
interest rate on the senior debt amounted to 7.08%. The interest rates on
borrowings under the senior bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based
on the
company’s defined indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis.
Additionally, a commitment fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged
on
the unused portion of the revolving credit line. This variable commitment
fee
amounted to 0.20% as of June 30, 2007.
In
August
2006, the company completed its acquisition of Houno A/S in Denmark. This
acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt facilities with
borrowings in Danish Krone. As of June 30, 2007, these facilities amounted
to $4.4 million in US dollars, including $1.5 million outstanding under a
revolving credit facility, $2.1 million of a term loan and $0.8 million of
a
long term mortgage note. The interest rate on the revolving credit
facility is assessed at 1.25% above Euro LIBOR, which amounted to 5.8% on
June
30, 2007. The term loan matures in 2013 and the interest rate is assessed
at
5.62%. The long-term mortgage note matures in March 2023 and is assessed
interest at a fixed rate of 5.19%.
In
December 2005, the company entered into a $3.2 million U.S. dollar secured
term
loan at its subsidiary in Spain. This term loan amortizes in equal monthly
installments over a four-year period ending December 31, 2009. As of June
30,
2007, the company had fully repaid the borrowings under this loan.
11
The
company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. In January 2005,
the
company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount
of
$70.0 million. This agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate of 3.78%.
The notional amount amortizes consistent with the repayment schedule of the
company's term loan maturing November 2009. The unamortized notional amount
of
this swap as of June 30, 2007 was $40.0 million. In January 2006, the company
entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of $10.0
million maturing on December 21, 2009. This agreement swaps one-month LIBOR
for
a fixed rate of 5.03%.
The
terms
of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital
expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, certain ratios
of
indebtedness and fixed charge coverage. The credit agreement also provides
that
if a material adverse change in the company’s business operations or conditions
occurs, the lender could declare an event of default. Under terms of the
agreement a material adverse effect is defined as (a) a material adverse
change
in, or a material adverse effect upon, the operations, business properties,
condition (financial and otherwise) or prospects of the company and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the ability of
the
company to perform under the loan agreements and to avoid any event of default;
or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect
or
enforceability against the company of any loan document. A material adverse
effect is determined on a subjective basis by the company's creditors. At
June
30, 2007, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its
borrowing agreements.
11)
|
Financial
Instruments
|
In
June
1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and
Hedging Activities". SFAS No. 133, as amended, establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments. The statement requires an
entity
to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure
those
instruments at fair value. Derivatives that do not qualify as a hedge must
be
adjusted to fair value in earnings. If the derivative does qualify as a hedge
under SFAS No. 133, changes in the fair value will either be offset against
the
change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments
or
recognized in other accumulated comprehensive income until the hedged item
is
recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a hedge's change in fair
value will be immediately recognized in earnings.
Foreign
Exchange:
The
company has entered into derivative instruments, principally forward contracts
to reduce exposures pertaining to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
As of
June 30, 2007 the company had no forward contracts outstanding.
Interest
Rate:
In
January 2005, the company entered into an interest rate swap with a notional
amount of $70.0 million to fix the interest rate applicable to certain of
its
variable-rate debt. The notional amount of the swap amortizes consistent
with
the repayment schedule of the company's senior term loan maturing in November
2009. As of June 30, 2007, the unamortized balance of the interest rate swap
was
$40.0 million. The agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate of 3.78%
and
is in effect through November 2009. The company designated the swap as a
cash
flow hedge at its inception and all changes in the fair value of the swap
are
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2007,
the
fair value of this instrument was $0.8 million. The change in fair value
of this
swap agreement in the first six months of 2007 was a gain of less than $0.1
million, net of taxes.
12
In
January 2006, the company entered into another interest rate swap with a
notional amount of $10.0 million to fix the interest rate applicable to certain
of its variable-rate debt. The agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed
rate
of 5.03% and is in effect through December 2009. The company designated the
swap
a cash flow hedge at is inception and all changes in fair value of the swap
are
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2007,
the
fair value of this instrument was less than $0.1 million. The fair value
of this
swap agreement in the first six months of 2007 did not materially change.
12)
|
Segment
Information
|
The
company operates in three reportable operating segments defined by management
reporting structure and operating activities.
The
Commercial Foodservice Equipment business group manufactures cooking equipment
for the restaurant and institutional kitchen industry. This business segment
has
manufacturing facilities in California, Illinois, Michigan, New Hampshire,
North
Carolina, Vermont, Denmark and the Philippines. The
Commercial Foodservice Equipment group manufactures conveyor ovens, convection
ovens, fryers, ranges, toasters, combi ovens, steamers, broilers, deck ovens,
baking ovens, proofers and counter-top cooking and warming equipment. This
business segment’s principal product lines include Middleby Marshall® and CTX®
conveyor oven equipment, Blodgett® convection ovens, conveyor ovens, deck oven
equipment, Blodgett Combi® cooking equipment, Blodgett Range® ranges, Nu-Vu®
baking ovens and proofers, Pitco Frialator® fryer equipment, Southbend® ranges,
convection ovens and heavy-duty cooking equipment, Toastmaster® toasters and
counterline cooking and warming equipment, Jade Range® ranges and ovens, Carter
Hoffmann® warming, holding and transporting equipment, Houno® combi-ovens and
baking ovens and MagiKitch'n® charbroilers and catering equipment.
The
Food
Processing Equipment business group manufactures cooking and packaging equipment
for the food processing industry. This business segment has a manufacturing
facility in Wisconsin. Its principal products include Alkar®
batch
ovens, conveyorized ovens and continuous process ovens and RapidPak®
food
packaging machinery.
The
International Distribution Division provides integrated sales, export
management, distribution and installation services through its operations
in
China, India, Lebanon, Mexico, the Philippines, Russia, South Korea, Spain,
Sweden, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The division sells the company’s product
lines and certain non-competing complementary product lines throughout the
world. For a local country distributor or dealer, the company is able to
provide
a centralized source of foodservice equipment with complete export management
and product support services.
The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. The chief decision maker evaluates
individual segment performance based on operating income. Management believes
that intersegment sales are made at established arms-length transfer
prices.
13
Net
Sales Summary
(dollars
in thousands)
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||
Business
Divisions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice
|
93,108
|
82.2
|
85,284
|
81.3
|
183,647
|
83.9
|
165,044
|
81.9
|
|||||||||||||||||
International
Distribution(1)
|
14,521
|
12.8
|
14,136
|
13.5
|
28,097
|
12.8
|
27,579
|
13.7
|
|||||||||||||||||
Food
Processing
|
13,353
|
11.8
|
14,829
|
14.2
|
25,549
|
11.7
|
28,520
|
14.1
|
|||||||||||||||||
Intercompany
sales (2)
|
(7,734
|
)
|
(6.8
|
)
|
(9,400
|
)
|
(9.0
|
)
|
(18,350
|
)
|
(8.4
|
)
|
(19,545
|
)
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
113,248
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
104,849
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
218,943
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
201,598
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||||||
(1) |
Consists
of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products
manufactured
by third parties.
|
(2) |
Represents
the elimination of sales amongst the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group and from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group
to the International Distribution Division.
|
14
The
following table summarizes the results of operations for the company's business
segments(1)(in
thousands):
|
Commercial
|
International
|
Food
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Foodservice
|
Distribution
|
Processing
|
and
Other(2)
|
Eliminations(3)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Three
months ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
93,108
|
$
|
14,521
|
$
|
13,353
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(7,734
|
)
|
$
|
113,248
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
22,291
|
1,136
|
3,617
|
(6,199
|
)
|
357
|
21,202
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
808
|
40
|
124
|
37
|
--
|
1,009
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
408
|
44
|
6
|
13
|
--
|
471
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Six
months ended June 30, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
183,647
|
$
|
28,097
|
$
|
25,549
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(18,350
|
)
|
$
|
218,943
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
44,079
|
1,982
|
6,017
|
(12,481
|
)
|
411
|
40,008
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
1,503
|
83
|
251
|
73
|
--
|
1,910
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
928
|
55
|
12
|
74
|
--
|
1,069
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
245,757
|
26,883
|
44,858
|
6,775
|
(8,352
|
)
|
315,921
|
||||||||||||
Long-lived
assets(4)
|
144,465
|
433
|
30,491
|
5,990
|
--
|
181,379
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Three
months ended July 1, 2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
85,284
|
$
|
14,136
|
$
|
14,829
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(9,400
|
)
|
$
|
104,849
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
22,444
|
947
|
1,939
|
(4,405
|
)
|
(646
|
)
|
20,279
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
680
|
35
|
105
|
(6
|
)
|
--
|
814
|
||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
234
|
42
|
65
|
43
|
--
|
384
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Six
months ended July 1, 2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
165,044
|
$
|
27,579
|
$
|
28,520
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(19,545
|
)
|
$
|
201,598
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
42,173
|
1,864
|
2,564
|
(10,479
|
)
|
(695
|
)
|
35,427
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
1,363
|
70
|
276
|
(2
|
)
|
--
|
1,707
|
||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
443
|
48
|
95
|
299
|
--
|
885
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
200,875
|
27,756
|
47,056
|
4,815
|
(6,363
|
)
|
274,139
|
||||||||||||
Long-lived
assets(4)
|
129,035
|
334
|
26,213
|
5,713
|
--
|
161,297
|
(1) |
Non-operating
expenses are not allocated to the operating segments. Non-operating
expenses consist of interest expense and
deferred financing amortization, gains foreign exchange gains
and losses
and other income and expenses
items outside of income from
operations.
|
(2) |
Includes
corporate and other general company assets and
operations.
|
(3) |
Includes
elimination of intercompany sales, profit in inventory and intercompany
receivables. Intercompany
sale transactions are predominantly
from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International
Distribution Division.
|
(4) |
Long-lived
assets of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group includes
assets
located in the Philippines which amounted to $1,969 and
$2,039 in 2007 and 2006, respectively and assets located in Denmark
which
amounted to $781 in 2007
.
|
15
Net
sales
by major geographic region, including those sales from the Commercial
Foodservice Equipment Group direct to international customers, were as follows
(in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
||||||||||
United
States and Canada
|
$
|
91,509
|
$
|
85,664
|
$
|
177,541
|
$
|
164,767
|
|||||
Asia
|
6,169
|
7,409
|
11,642
|
13,556
|
|||||||||
Europe
and Middle East
|
12,495
|
6,989
|
23,272
|
14,742
|
|||||||||
Latin
America
|
3,075
|
4,787
|
6,488
|
8,533
|
|||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
113,248
|
$
|
104,849
|
$
|
218,943
|
$
|
201,598
|
13)
|
Employee
Retirement
Plans
|
(a) Pension
Plans
The
company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit plan for its union
employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility. Benefits are determined based
upon
retirement age and years of service with the company. This defined benefit
plan
was frozen on April 30, 2002 and no further benefits accrue to the participants
beyond this date. Plan participants will receive or continue to receive payments
for benefits earned on or prior to April 30, 2002 upon reaching retirement
age.
The employees participating in the defined benefit plan were enrolled in
a newly
established 401K savings plan on July 1, 2002, further described below.
The
company also maintains a retirement benefit agreement with its Chairman.
The
retirement benefits are based upon a percentage of the Chairman’s final base
salary. Additionally, the company maintains a retirement plan for non-employee
directors. The plan provides for an annual benefit upon a change in control
of
the company or retirement from the Board of Directors at age 70, equal to
100%
of the director’s last annual retainer, payable for a number of years equal to
the director’s years of service up to a maximum of 10 years.
Contributions
under the union plan are funded in accordance with provisions of The Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Expected contributions to be made
in
2007 are $183,000, of which $46,000 was funded during the six-month period
ended
June 30, 2007. Contributions to the directors' plan are based upon actual
retirement benefits as they retire.
(b) 401K
Savings Plans
The
company maintains two separate defined contribution 401K savings plans covering
all employees in the United States. These two plans separately cover the
union
employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility and all other remaining union and
non-union employees in the United States. The company makes profit sharing
contributions to the various plans in accordance with the requirements of
the
plan. Profit sharing contributions for the Elgin Union 401K savings plans
are
made in accordance with the agreement.
16
14)
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On
July
2, 2007, subsequent to the end of the second quarter of 2007, the company
completed its acquisition of the assets and operations of MP Equipment Company
for $15 million in cash. MP Equipment Company is a manufacturer of food
processing equipment with approximately $20 million in annual revenues. The
acquisition had no effect on the company’s financial statements for the second
quarter of 2007.
On
July
30, 2007, subsequent to the end of the 2007 second quarter, the company
announced that it entered into a new collective bargaining agreement with
its
unionized workforce at its Elgin, Illinois manufacturing facility, ending
a work
stoppage at this facility that began on May 17, 2007 after the unionized
workforce failed to ratify a final contract proposal of its expired collective
bargaining agreement. The new contract included a ratification
bonus and a voluntary retirement program offered to the union employees,
which
the company anticipates will result in one time payments of approximately
$2.0
million to be incurred during the third quarter of 2007.
On
August
3, 2007, subsequent to the end of the second quarter of 2007, the company
completed it acquisition of the assets and operations of Wells Bloomfield
Company for $29 million in cash. Wells Bloomfield is a manufacturer of
cooking
equipment and beverage equipment with approximately $50 million in annual
revenues. The acquisition had no effect on the company’s financial statements
for the second quarter of 2007.
17
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations.
Informational
Note
This
report contains forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor created
by
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company cautions
readers that these projections are based upon future results or events and
are
highly dependent upon a variety of important factors which could cause such
results or events to differ materially from any forward-looking statements
which
may be deemed to have been made in this report, or which are otherwise made
by
or on behalf of the company. Such factors include, but are not limited to,
volatility in earnings resulting from goodwill impairment losses which may
occur
irregularly and in varying amounts; variability in financing costs; quarterly
variations in operating results; dependence on key customers; international
exposure; foreign exchange and political risks affecting international sales;
ability to protect trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property;
changing market conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing;
the
timely development and market acceptance of the company’s products; the
availability and cost of raw materials; and other risks detailed herein and
from
time-to-time in the company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings,
including the company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
18
Net
Sales Summary
(dollars
in thousands)
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||
Business
Divisions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice
|
93,108
|
82.2
|
85,284
|
81.3
|
183,647
|
83.9
|
165,044
|
81.9
|
|||||||||||||||||
International
Distribution(1)
|
14,521
|
12.8
|
14,136
|
13.5
|
28,097
|
12.8
|
27,579
|
13.7
|
|||||||||||||||||
Food
Processing
|
13,353
|
11.8
|
14,829
|
14.2
|
25,549
|
11.7
|
28,520
|
14.1
|
|||||||||||||||||
Intercompany
sales (2)
|
(7,734
|
)
|
(6.8
|
)
|
(9,400
|
)
|
(9.0
|
)
|
(18,350
|
)
|
(8.4
|
)
|
(19,545
|
)
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
113,248
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
104,849
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
218,943
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
201,598
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||||||
(1) |
Consists
of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products
manufactured
by third parties.
|
(2) |
Represents
the elimination of sales amongst the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group and from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the
International Distribution Division.
|
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of earnings items
as
a percentage of net sales for the periods.
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
Jun.
30, 2007
|
Jul.
1, 2006
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
60.4
|
60.2
|
60.7
|
61.7
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
39.6
|
39.8
|
39.3
|
38.3
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
20.9
|
20.5
|
21.0
|
20.7
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
18.7
|
19.3
|
18.3
|
17.6
|
|||||||||
Net
interest expense and deferred financing amortization
|
1.1
|
1.9
|
1.1
|
2.0
|
|||||||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
(0.5
|
)
|
0.2
|
(0.2
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
18.1
|
17.2
|
17.4
|
15.6
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
7.0
|
6.6
|
6.8
|
6.1
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
11.1
|
%
|
10.6
|
%
|
10.6
|
%
|
9.5
|
%
|
19
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended
July
1, 2006
NET
SALES. Net
sales
for the second quarter of fiscal 2007 were $113.2 million as compared to
$104.9
million in the second quarter of 2006.
Net
sales
at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group amounted to $93.1 million in
the
second quarter of 2007 as compared to $85.3 million in the prior year quarter.
Net
sales
from the acquisition of Houno and Jade Range, which were acquired on
August 31, 2006 and April 1, 2007, respectively, accounted for an
increase of $7.2 million during the second quarter of 2007.
Net
sales
of conveyor ovens were $3.6 million lower than the prior year second quarter
due
to a work stoppage that occurred at the Elgin, Illinois production facility
that
began on May 17, 2007 after the unionized workforce failed to ratify a final
contract proposal of an expired collective bargaining agreement. On July
30, 2007 subsequent to the end of the second quarter the company announced
it
had entered into a new collective bargaining agreement with its Elgin, Illinois
unionized workforce bringing an end to the work stoppage.
Excluding
the impact of acquisitions and the sales of conveyor ovens impacted by the
work
stoppage, net sales of commercial foodservice equipment increased $4.2 million
driven by increased sales of combi-ovens, convection ovens, and ranges,
reflecting the impact of new product introductions and price
increases.
Net
sales
at the International Distribution Division increased by $0.4 million to $14.5
million, reflecting higher sales in Europe partially offset by a decline
in
Latin America.
Net
sales
for the Food Processing Equipment Group decreased by $1.4 million to $13.4
million in the second quarter of 2007 from $14.8 million in the prior year
quarter due to acquisition integration initiatives put in place to eliminate
low
margin and unprofitable sales.
GROSS
PROFIT. Gross
profit increased to $44.9 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $41.7
million in the prior year period, reflecting the impact of higher sales volumes.
The gross margin rate was 39.6% in the second quarter of 2007 as compared
to 39.8% in the prior year quarter. The net decrease in the gross margin
rate
reflects:
· |
Lower
margins at the Elgin, Illinois manufacturing facility which was
adversely
impacted by the work stoppage.
|
· |
The
adverse impact of steel costs which have risen significantly from
the
prior year quarter.
|
· |
Improved
margins at the Food Processing Equipment Group, which was acquired
in
December 2005, resulting from cost reduction initiatives and elimination
of unprofitable sales.
|
· |
Increased
sales volumes that benefited manufacturing efficiencies and provided
for
greater leverage of fixed manufacturing
costs.
|
· |
Higher
margins associated with new product
sales.
|
20
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined
selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $21.4 million
in
the second quarter of 2006 to $23.7 million in the second quarter of 2007.
As a
percentage of net sales, operating expenses increased from 20.5% in the second
quarter of 2006 to 20.9% in the second quarter of 2007. Selling expenses
increased from $10.8 million in the second quarter of 2006 to $12.0 million
in
the second quarter of 2007, reflecting $1.1 million of incremental costs
associated with the acquisition of Houno, completed in August 2006 and the
acquisition of Jade completed on April 1, 2007. General and administrative
expenses increased from $10.7 million in the second quarter of 2006 to $11.7
million in the second quarter of 2007. General and administrative expenses
reflects $1.0 million of costs associated with the acquired Houno and Jade
operations.
NON-OPERATING
EXPENSES. Interest
and deferred financing amortization costs decreased from $2.0 million in
the
second quarter of 2006 to $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2007, as
the
benefit of lower debt balances was offset in part by higher interest rates.
Other income of $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared favorably
to
other expense of $0.2 million in the prior year second quarter. Other income
in
the second quarter of 2007 included a $0.4 million gain from an insurance
settlement, a $0.3 million foreign currency exchange gain and $0.2 million
of
expense associated with environmental exposures.
INCOME
TAXES. A
tax
provision of $8.0 million, at an effective rate of 39%, was recorded during
the
second quarter of 2007, as compared to a $7.0 million provision at a 39%
effective rate in the prior year quarter.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months Ended July 1,
2006
NET
SALES. Net
sales
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007 were $218.9 million as compared
to
$201.1 million in the six-month period ended July 1, 2006.
Net
sales
at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group amounted to $183.6 million
in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $165.0 million in the
six-month period ended July 1, 2006.
Net
sales
from the acquisition of Houno and Jade Range, which were acquired on August
31,
2006 and April 1, 2007, respectively, accounted for an increase of $10.8
million
during the first six months of 2007.
Net
sales
of conveyor ovens which had increased $4.5 million in the first quarter of
2007
as compared to the 2006 first quarter due to increased sales of new product,
decreased $3.6 million in the second quarter as compared to the 2006 second
quarter due to a work stoppage that occurred at the Elgin, Illinois production
facility that began on May 17, 2007 after the unionized workforce failed
to
ratify a final contract proposal of an expired collective bargaining
agreement. On July 30, 2007, subsequent to the end of the second quarter
the company announced it had entered into a new collective bargaining agreement
with its Elgin, Illinois unionized workforce bringing an end to the work
stoppage.
21
Excluding
the impact of acquisitions and the sales of conveyor ovens impacted by the
work
stoppage, net sales of commercial foodservice equipment increased $5.0 million
for
the six-month period ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six month period
ended
July 1, 2006. The net increase includes increased sales of combi-ovens,
convection ovens, fryers and ranges, reflecting the impact of new product
introductions and price increases. This net increase was offset in part by
reduced counterline equipment sales which were affected by a disruption in
business resulting from a relocation of production operations from the company’s
facility in Elgin, Illinois to its Michigan manufacturing operation, which
began in the fourth quarter of 2006 and was completed in the first quarter
of
2007.
Net
sales
at the International Distribution Division increased from $27.6 million
for
the six-month period ended July 1, 2006 to $28.1 million for
the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007, reflecting higher sales in Latin
America and Asia, which more than offset a decline in sales in Europe, which
had
strong sales in the prior year due to an oven rollout with a major restaurant
chain customer. International sales benefited from expansion of the U.S.
chains
overseas and increased business with local and regional restaurant chains
in
developing markets.
Net
sales
for the Food Processing Equipment Group decreased by $3.0 million to $25.5
million for
the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007 from $28.5 million for
the
six-month period ended July 1, 2006, due to acquisition integration
initiatives put in place to eliminate low margin and unprofitable
sales.
GROSS
PROFIT. Gross
profit increased to $86.0 million for
the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007 from $77.3 million for
the
six-month period ended July 1, 2006, reflecting the impact of higher
sales volumes. The gross margin rate was 39.3% for
the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 38.3% for the
six-month period ended July 1, 2006. The net increase in the gross margin
rate
reflects:
· |
Lower
margins at the Elgin, Illinois manufacturing facility which was
adversely
impacted by the work stoppage.
|
· |
The
adverse impact of steel costs which have risen significantly from
the
prior year quarter.
|
· |
Improved
margins at the Food Processing Equipment Group, which was acquired
in
December 2005, resulting from cost reduction initiatives and elimination
of unprofitable sales.
|
· |
Increased
sales volumes that benefited manufacturing efficiencies and provided
for
greater leverage of fixed manufacturing
costs.
|
· |
Higher
margins associated with new product
sales.
|
22
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined
selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $41.8 million
in
the six-month period ended July 1, 2006 to $46.0 million in the six-month
period
ended June 30, 2007. As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses increased
from 20.7% in the six-month period ended July 1, 2006, to 21.0% in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2007 reflecting greater leverage on higher sales volumes.
Selling expenses increased from $20.9 million in
the
six-month period ended July 1, 2006 to $23.1 million in
the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007, reflecting $1.5 million of
increased costs associated with the newly acquired Houno and Jade operations
and
$0.7 million higher commission costs associated with the increased sales
volumes. General and administrative expenses increased from $20.9 million
in
the
six-month period ended July 1, 2006 to $22.9 million in
the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007, which includes increased costs of
$1.6 million associated with the newly acquired Houno and Jade operations.
General and administrative expenses also includes increased employee incentive
performance costs.
NON-OPERATING
EXPENSES. Interest
and deferred financing amortization costs decreased to $2.5 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007 from $3.8 million for the prior year
period, as the benefit of lower debt balances were offset in part by higher
interest rates. Other income was $0.7 million in
the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007, which primarily consisted of
foreign exchange gains, compared to other expense of $0.1 million in
the
six-month period ended July 1, 2006.
INCOME
TAXES. A
tax
provision of $14.9 million, at an effective rate of 39%, was recorded for
the
first six months of 2007 as compared to a $12.4 million provision at a 39%
effective rate in the prior year period.
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
During
the six months ended June 30, 2007, cash and cash equivalents increased by
$2.3
million to $5.8 million at June 30, 2007 from $3.5 million at December 30,
2006.
Net borrowings increased from $82.8 million at December 30, 2006 to $85.4
million at June 30, 2007.
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES. Net
cash
provided operating activities was $22.4 million for
the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $13.8 million for
the
six-month period ended July 1, 2006.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2007, working capital levels increased due
to the
higher sales volumes and increased seasonal working capital needs. The changes
in working capital included a $2.8 million increase in inventory and a $8.2
million decrease in accrued expenses and non-current liabilities as a result
of
the company’s funding of its 2006 customer rebate programs and employee
incentive compensation programs during the second quarter of 2007.
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES. During
the six months ended June 30, 2007, net cash used in investing activities
amounted to $24.4 million. This includes $15.9 million associated with the
acquisition of Carter Hoffmann, $7.4 million associated with the Jade
acquisition and $1.1 million of capital expenditures associated with additions
and upgrades of production and marketing equipment.
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES. Net
cash
flows provided by financing activities were $4.2 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2007. The net increase in debt includes $10.9 million in
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, $7.5 million of repayments
of
the company’s term loan and $0.9 million of repayments of foreign bank loans.
The company also received $1.7 million of net proceeds from the exercise
of
employee stock options.
23
Subsequent
to end of the second quarter of 2007, the company completed acquisitions
of MP
Equipment Company and Wells Bloomfield for $44.0 million in cash.
At
June
30, 2007, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its
borrowing agreements. Management believes that future cash flows from operating
activities and borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility
will
provide the company with sufficient financial resources to meet its anticipated
requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and debt amortization
for
the foreseeable future.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value
in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about
fair
value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value
measurements. This statement is effective for interim reporting periods in
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company will apply this
guidance prospectively. The company is continuing its process of determining
what impact the application of this guidance will have on the company's
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”. One provision of SFAS No. 158 requires the
measurement of the company’s defined benefit plan’s assets and its obligation to
determine the funded status be made as of the end of the fiscal year. This
provision of SFAS No. 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after December
15, 2008. The company does not anticipate that the impact from the adoption
of
this provision of SFAS No. 158 will be significant to its financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement
is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company
will
apply this guidance prospectively. The company is continuing its process
of
determining what impact the application of this guidance will have on the
company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
24
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
are
based upon the company's consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the
company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related disclosures.
On an
ongoing basis, the company evaluates its estimates and judgments based on
historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Property
and equipment: Property
and equipment are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over
their
useful lives based on management's estimates of the period over which the
assets
will be utilized to benefit the operations of the company. The useful lives
are
estimated based on historical experience with similar assets, taking into
account anticipated technological or other changes. The company
periodically reviews these lives relative to physical factors, economic factors
and industry trends. If there are changes in the planned use of property
and
equipment or if technological changes were to occur more rapidly than
anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened,
resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense
in future periods.
Long-lived
assets: Long-lived
assets (including goodwill and other intangibles) are reviewed for impairment
annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the
recoverability of the company's long-lived assets, the company considers
changes
in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash
flows and other factors. Estimates of future cash flows are judgments
based on the company's experience and knowledge of operations. These
estimates can be significantly impacted by many factors including changes
in
global and local business and economic conditions, operating costs, inflation,
competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the company's
estimates or the underlying assumptions change in the future, the company
may be
required to record impairment charges.
Warranty: In
the
normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific
product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the
period
in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on
contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically
adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts
that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ
from
amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made
as
changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
Litigation: From
time
to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The
company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers
compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The
company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or
outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses.
A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these
contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance
coverage. The reserve requirements may change in the future due to new
developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy
in
dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition
or
results of operations.
25
Income
taxes: The
company operates in numerous foreign and domestic taxing jurisdictions where
it
is subject to various types of tax, including sales tax and income tax.
The company's tax filings are subject to audits and adjustments. Because
of the
nature of the company’s operations, the nature of the audit items can be
complex, and the objectives of the government auditors can result in a tax
on
the same transaction or income in more than one state or country. As part
of the company's calculation of the provision for taxes, the company establishes
reserves for the amount that it expects to incur as a result of audits. The
reserves may change in the future due to new developments related to the
various
tax matters.
Contractual
Obligations
The
company's contractual cash payment obligations as of June 30, 2007 are set
forth
below (in thousands):
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Idle
|
Contractual
|
||||||||||||
Long-term
|
Operating
|
Facility
|
Cash
|
||||||||||
Debt
|
Leases
|
Leases
|
Obligations
|
||||||||||
Less
than 1 year
|
$
|
16,572
|
$
|
1,866
|
$
|
359
|
$
|
18,797
|
|||||
1-3
years
|
66,207
|
2,868
|
742
|
69,817
|
|||||||||
3-5
years
|
111
|
284
|
878
|
1,273
|
|||||||||
After
5 years
|
2,538
|
--
|
1,401
|
3,939
|
|||||||||
$
|
85,428
|
$
|
5,018
|
$
|
3,380
|
$
|
93,826
|
Idle
facility leases consists of an obligation for a manufacturing location that
was
exited in conjunction with the company's manufacturing consolidation efforts.
This lease obligation continues through December 2014. This facility has
been
subleased. The obligation presented above does not reflect any anticipated
sublease income from the facilities.
The
projected benefit obligation of the company’s defined benefit plans exceeded the
plans’ assets by $3.5 million at the end of 2006 as compared to $2.4 million at
the end of 2005. The unfunded benefit obligations were comprised of a $0.7
million under funding of the company's union plan and $2.8 million of under
funding of the company's director plans. The company does not expect to
contribute to the director plans in 2007. The company made minimum contributions
required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) of
$0.2 million in 2006 to the company's union plan. The company expects to
continue to make minimum contributions of $0.2 million in 2007 to the union
plan
as required by ERISA.
The
company has $3.6 million in outstanding letters of credit, which expire on
March
31, 2008 with an automatic one-year renewal, to secure potential obligations
under insurance programs.
The
company places purchase orders with its suppliers in the ordinary course
of
business. These purchase orders are generally to fulfill short-term
manufacturing requirements of less than 90 days and most are cancelable with
a
restocking penalty. The company has no long-term purchase contracts or minimum
purchase obligations with any supplier.
26
The
company has contractual obligations under its various debt agreements to
make
interest payments. These amounts are subject to the level of borrowings in
future periods and the interest rate for the applicable periods, and therefore
the amounts of these payments is not determinable.
The
company has no activities, obligations or exposures associated with off-balance
sheet arrangements.
27
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
The
company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. The
following table summarizes the maturity of the company’s debt
obligations.
|
Fixed
|
Variable
|
|||||
Rate
|
Rate
|
||||||
Twelve
Month Period Ending
|
Debt
|
Debt
|
|||||
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||
June
30, 2008
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
16,572
|
|||
June
30, 2009
|
--
|
16,976
|
|||||
June
30, 2010
|
--
|
49,231
|
|||||
June
30, 2011
|
--
|
111
|
|||||
June
30, 2012
|
1,719
|
819
|
|||||
|
$
|
1,719
|
$ |
83,709
|
During
the fourth quarter of 2005, the company amended its senior secured credit
facility. Terms of the agreement currently provide for $40.0 million of term
loans and $130.0 million of availability under a revolving credit line. As
of
June 30, 2007, the company had $81.0 million outstanding under its senior
banking facility, including $41.0 million of borrowings under the revolving
credit line. The company also had $3.6 million in outstanding letters of
credit,
which reduced the borrowing availability under the revolving credit
line.
Borrowings
under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate
of
1.00% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime
rate
and the Federal Funds Rate for short-term borrowings. At June 30, 2007, the
average interest rate on the senior debt amounted to 7.08%. The interest
rates
on borrowings under the senior bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based
on
the company’s defined indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis.
Additionally, a commitment fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged
on
the unused portion of the revolving credit line. This variable commitment
fee
amounted to 0.20% as of June 30, 2007.
In
August
2006, the company completed its acquisition of Houno A/S in Denmark. This
acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt facilities with
borrowings in Danish Krone. As of June 30, 2007 these facilities amounted
to $4.4 million in US dollars, including $1.5 million outstanding under a
revolving credit facility, $2.1 million of a term loan and $0.8 million of
a
long term mortgage note. The interest rate on the revolving credit
facility is assessed at 1.25% above Euro LIBOR, which amounted to 5.8% on
June
30, 2007. The term loan matures in 2013 and the interest rate is assessed
at
5.62%. The long-term mortgage note matures in March 2023 and is assessed
interest at a fixed rate of 5.19%.
In
December 2005, the company entered into a $3.2 million U.S. Dollar secured
term
loan at its subsidiary in Spain. This loan amortizes in equal monthly
installments over a four year period ending December 31, 2009. As of June
30,
2007, the company had fully repaid the borrowings remaining under this loan.
28
The
company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. In January 2005,
the
company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount
of
$70.0 million. This agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate of 3.78%.
The notional amount amortizes consistent with the repayment schedule of the
company's term loan maturing November 2009. The unamortized notational amount
of
this swap as of June 30, 2007 was $40.0 million. In January 2006, the company
entered into an interest rate swap for a notional amount of $10.0 million
maturing on December 31, 2009. This agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a
fixed
rate of 5.03%.
The
terms
of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital
expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, certain ratios
of
indebtedness and fixed charge coverage. The credit agreement also provides
that
if a material adverse change in the company’s business operations or conditions
occurs, the lender could declare an event of default. Under terms of the
agreement a material adverse effect is defined as (a) a material adverse
change
in, or a material adverse effect upon, the operations, business properties,
condition (financial and otherwise) or prospects of the company and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the ability of
the
company to perform under the loan agreements and to avoid any event of default;
or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect
or
enforceability against the company of any loan document. A material adverse
effect is determined on a subjective basis by the company's creditors. At
June
30, 2007, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its
borrowing agreements.
Financing
Derivative Instruments
In
January 2005, the company entered into an interest rate swap with a notional
amount of $70.0 million to fix the interest rate applicable to certain of
its
variable-rate debt. The notional amount of the swap amortizes consistent
with
the repayment schedule of the company's senior term loan maturing in November
2009. The agreement swaps one-month LIBOR for a fixed rate of 3.78% and is
in
effect through November 2009. The interest rate swap has been designated
a cash
flow hedge, and in accordance with SFAS No. 133 the changes in fair value
are
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. As of
June
30, 2007, the fair value of this instrument was $0.8 million. The change
in fair
value of this swap agreement in the first six months of 2007 was a loss of
$0.2
million, net of $0.1 million of taxes. In January 2006, the company entered
into
an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of $10.0 million maturing
on December 21, 2009. This agreement swaps one month LIBOR for a fixed rate
of
5.03%. The interest rate swap has been designated a cash flow hedge, and
in
accordance with SFAS No. 133 the changes in fair value are recorded as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2007,
the
fair value of this instrument was less than $0.1 million. The change in fair
value of this swap agreement in the first six months of 2007 was a gain of
less
than $0.1 million.
29
Foreign
Exchange Derivative Financial Instruments
The
company uses foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts with terms
of
less than one year, to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. The company’s primary hedging activities are to mitigate its
exposure to changes in exchange rates on intercompany and third party trade
receivables and payables. The company does not currently enter into derivative
financial instruments for speculative purposes. In managing its foreign currency
exposures, the company identifies and aggregates naturally occurring offsetting
positions and then hedges residual balance sheet exposures. There was no
forward
contract outstanding at the end of the quarter.
30
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
The
company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the company's Exchange Act reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to the company's management, including its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
As
of
June 30, 2007, the company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision
and
with the participation of the company's management, including the company's
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the
design and operation of the company's disclosure controls and procedures.
Based
on the foregoing, the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the company's
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of this
period.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2007, there has been no change in the company's
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or
is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting.
31
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
The
company was not required to report the information pursuant to Items 1 through
6
of Part II of Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2007, except as
follows:
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes in the risk factors as set forth in the company's
2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
In
July
1998, the company's Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program
that
authorized the purchase of common shares in open market purchases. As of
June 30, 2007, 952,999 shares had been purchased under the 1998 stock repurchase
program. As of June 30, 2007, 1,694,002 shares are authorized for purchase
under
the stock repurchase program. No shares were repurchased by the company
during the six month period ended June 30, 2007.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote
of Security
Holders
On
May 3,
2007, the company held its 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The following
persons were elected as directors to hold office until the 2008 Annual
Meeting
of Stockholders: Selim A. Bassoul, Robert B. Lamb, Ryan Levenson, John
R. Miller
III, Gordon O'Brien, Philip G. Putnam, Sabin C. Streeter and Robert L.
Yohe, The
number of shares cast for, withheld and abstained with respect to each
of the
nominees were as follows:
Nominee
|
For
|
|
Withheld
|
|
Abstained
|
|||||
Bassoul
|
5,006,660
|
2.425,394
|
0
|
|||||||
Lamb
|
7,306,180
|
125,874
|
0
|
|||||||
Levenson
|
7,278,329
|
153,725
|
0
|
|||||||
Miller
|
7,203,755
|
228,229
|
0
|
|||||||
O'Brien
|
7.278,579
|
153,475
|
0
|
|||||||
Putnam
|
7.231.579
|
200,475
|
0
|
|||||||
Streeter
|
7,231,796
|
200,258
|
0
|
|||||||
Yohe
|
7,210,855
|
221,199
|
0
|
The
stockholders voted to approve the ratification of the selection of Deloitte
and
Touche LLP as independent auditors for the company for the fiscal year
ending
December 29, 2007. 7,306,660 shares were cast for such election, 125,394
shares
were cast against such election, and 570,714 shares abstained.
The
stockholders voted to approve an amendment to the Restated Certificate
of
Incorporation. 7,080,731 shares were cast for election. 341,873 shares
were cast
against such election, and 9,450 shares abstained.
The
stockholders voted to approve the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. 7,097,348
shares
were cast for election, 330,188 shares were cast against such election,
and
4,518 shares abstained.
32
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibits
- The following exhibits are filed herewith:
Exhibit
31.1 - Rule 13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit
31.2 - Rule 13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit
32.1 -
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer of The Middleby Corporation
Pursuant to Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350).
Exhibit
32.2 -
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer of The Middleby Corporation
Pursuant to Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350).
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION | ||
|
|
(Registrant)
|
Date August 9, 2007___________ | By: | /s/ Timothy J. FitzGerald |
Timothy
J. FitzGerald
Vice
President,
Chief
Financial Officer
|
34