MIDDLEBY Corp - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934
For
the quarterly period ended September 27, 2008
or
o
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934
Commission
File No. 1-9973
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware
|
36-3352497
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
1400
Toastmaster Drive, Elgin, Illinois
|
60120
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
Telephone No., including Area Code (847)
741-3300
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
See
definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer x
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non
accelerated filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
x
As
of
October 31, 2008, there were 16,993,843 shares of the registrant's common stock
outstanding.
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2008
INDEX
DESCRIPTION
|
PAGE
|
||
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September
27, 2008 and December 29, 2007
|
1
|
||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
September
27, 2008 and September 29, 2007
|
2
|
||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
September
27, 2008 and September 29, 2007
|
3
|
||
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
4
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
24
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
34
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
37
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
38
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
41
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
42
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts
In Thousands, Except Share Data)
(Unaudited)
Sep.
27, 2008
|
|
Dec.
29, 2007
|
|||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
7,027
|
$
|
7,463
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of $7,684 and
$5,818
|
91,633
|
73,090
|
|||||
Inventories,
net
|
94,360
|
66,438
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
9,697
|
10,341
|
|||||
Prepaid
taxes
|
7,627
|
17,986
|
|||||
Current
deferred taxes
|
14,788
|
11,095
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
225,132
|
186,413
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $43,046 and
$41,114
|
44,562
|
36,774
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
248,779
|
134,800
|
|||||
Other
intangibles
|
125,726
|
52,581
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
3,836
|
3,079
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
648,035
|
$
|
413,647
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
$
|
7,803
|
$
|
2,683
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
34,377
|
26,576
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
98,535
|
95,581
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
140,715
|
124,840
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
249,850
|
93,514
|
|||||
Long-term
deferred tax liability
|
20,856
|
2,568
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
18,847
|
9,813
|
|||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; nonvoting; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Common
stock, $0.01 par value; 47,500,000 shares authorized; 21,068,556
and
20,732,836 shares issued in 2008 and 2007, respectively
|
120
|
120
|
|||||
Paid-in
capital
|
106,739
|
104,782
|
|||||
Treasury
stock at cost; 4,074,713 and 3,855,044 shares in 2008 and 2007,
respectively
|
(102,000
|
)
|
(89,641
|
)
|
|||
Retained
earnings
|
213,484
|
166,896
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
(576
|
)
|
755
|
||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
217,767
|
182,912
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
648,035
|
$
|
413,647
|
See
accompanying notes
1
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
166,472
|
$
|
135,996
|
$
|
500,868
|
$
|
354,939
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
101,735
|
84,600
|
310,221
|
217,552
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
64,737
|
51,396
|
190,647
|
137,387
|
|||||||||
Selling
expenses
|
16,822
|
13,507
|
49,743
|
36,575
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
16,962
|
12,465
|
51,443
|
35,380
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
30,953
|
25,424
|
89,461
|
65,432
|
|||||||||
Net
interest expense and deferred financing
amortization
|
3,168
|
1,621
|
9,910
|
4,138
|
|||||||||
Other
expense (income), net
|
850
|
(316
|
)
|
1,798
|
(1,053
|
)
|
|||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
26,935
|
24,119
|
77,753
|
62,347
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
10,645
|
10,063
|
31,165
|
24,989
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
16,290
|
$
|
14,056
|
$
|
46,588
|
$
|
37,358
|
|||||
Net
earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
1.02
|
$
|
0.89
|
$
|
2.91
|
$
|
2.39
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.96
|
$
|
0.83
|
$
|
2.72
|
$
|
2.22
|
|||||
Weighted
average number of shares
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
15,911
|
15,743
|
15,985
|
15,632
|
|||||||||
Dilutive
stock options1
|
1,106
|
1,191
|
1,158
|
1,225
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
17,017
|
16,934
|
17,143
|
16,857
|
1
|
There
were no anti-dilutive stock options excluded from common stock equivalents
for any period presented.
|
See
accompanying notes
2
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
Thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
||||||
Cash flows
from operating activities-
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
46,588
|
$
|
37,358
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
10,256
|
4,850
|
|||||
Deferred
taxes
|
2,593
|
1,417
|
|||||
Non-cash
share-based compensation
|
8,421
|
5,540
|
|||||
Unrealized
loss on derivative financial instruments
|
169
|
—
|
|||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
100
|
(5,674
|
)
|
||||
Inventories,
net
|
(7,022
|
)
|
(2,992
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
13,243
|
(4,576
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
(2,108
|
)
|
6,866
|
||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
(8,248
|
)
|
3,195
|
||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
63,992
|
45,984
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities-
|
|||||||
Net
additions to property and equipment
|
(3,408
|
)
|
(1,689
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of Houno
|
—
|
(179
|
)
|
||||
Acquisition
of Jade
|
—
|
(7,779
|
)
|
||||
Acquisition
of Carter-Hoffmann
|
(167
|
)
|
(16,152
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of MP Equipment
|
(3,000
|
)
|
(15,193
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of Wells Bloomfield
|
(317
|
)
|
(28,803
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of Star
|
(188,241
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Acquisition
of Giga
|
(9,918
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Acquisition
of Frifri
|
(3,050
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(208,101
|
)
|
(69,795
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities-
|
|||||||
Net
proceeds under revolving credit facilities
|
156,450
|
36,750
|
|||||
Repayments
under senior secured bank notes
|
—
|
(11,250
|
)
|
||||
Net
proceeds (payments) under foreign bank loan
|
525
|
(822
|
)
|
||||
Debt
issuance costs
|
(1,002
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(12,359
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Net
proceeds from stock issuances
|
270
|
3,121
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
143,884
|
27,799
|
|||||
Effect
of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
(211
|
)
|
94
|
||||
Changes
in cash and cash equivalents-
|
|||||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(436
|
)
|
4,082
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
7,463
|
3,534
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of quarter
|
$
|
7,027
|
$
|
7,616
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
8,524
|
$
|
3,844
|
|||
Income
tax payments
|
$
|
19,582
|
$
|
24,815
|
See
accompanying notes
3
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
27, 2008
(Unaudited)
1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
A) Basis
of Presentation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by The Middleby
Corporation (the "company"), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements are unaudited
and
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
such
rules and regulations, although the company believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information not misleading. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes
contained in the company's 2007 Form 10-K/A.
In
the
opinion of management, the financial statements contain all adjustments
necessary to present fairly the financial position of the company as of
September 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007, and the results of operations for
the
three and nine months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007 and cash
flows for the nine months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007.
Subsequent
to the issuance of the company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for
the fiscal period ended March 29, 2008, the company determined that purchase
accounting methodology had been improperly applied as it related to the
calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities for certain acquisitions,
including Nu-Vu Foodservice Systems, Jade Products Company, Carter-Hoffman,
MP
Equipment, and Wells Bloomfield. Specifically, in each of these acquisitions,
the company allocated a portion of the purchase price to deferred tax assets
to
reflect the expected tax benefit to be realized from the future amortization
of
goodwill deductible for tax purposes. This restatement had no impact on the
company’s condensed consolidated statements of earnings or cash flows for the
three month period ended March 29, 2008.
B) Non-
Cash Share-Based
Compensation
The
company estimates the fair value of market-based stock awards and stock options
at the time of grant and recognizes compensation cost over the vesting period
of
the awards and options. Non-cash share-based compensation expense was $2.9
million and $2.2 million for the third quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Non-cash share-based compensation expense was $8.4 million and $5.5 million
for
the nine-month periods ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007,
respectively.
4
C) Income
Tax Contingencies
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (“FASB”) issued Interpretation
No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). This
interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should
recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain
tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.
FIN
48 states that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized
only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable, based on
its technical merits. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest
amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon
settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant
information. A tax benefit from an uncertain position was previously recognized
if it was probable of being sustained. Under FIN 48, the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits is classified as non-current unless the liability
is
expected to be settled in cash within 12 months of the reporting date. FIN
48
was effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after
December 15, 2006. The company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on the first
day
of fiscal 2007 as required.
As
of
December 29, 2007, the total amount of liability for unrecognized tax benefits
related to federal, state and foreign taxes was approximately $7.7 million
plus
approximately $1.0 million of accrued interest and $1.3 million of penalties.
As
of September 27, 2008, the corresponding balance of liability for unrecognized
tax benefits was approximately $9.6 million plus approximately $1.6 million
of
accrued interest and $1.3 million of penalties. The company recognizes interest
and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax
expense, which is consistent with reporting in prior periods.
During
the second quarter of 2008 the U.S. Internal Revenue Service completed an audit
of the company’s 2005 and 2006 federal income tax returns. Results of
these audits have been considered in the company’s evaluation of the reserve
requirements under FIN 48. The company does not anticipate that total
unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to any settlement of
audits and the expiration of statute of limitations within the next twelve
months.
The
company operates in multiple taxing jurisdictions; both within the United States
and outside of the United States, and faces audits from various tax authorities.
The company remains subject to examination until the statute of limitations
expires for the respective tax jurisdiction. Within specific countries, the
company and its operating subsidiaries may be subject to audit by various tax
authorities and may be subject to different statute of limitations expiration
dates. A summary of the tax years that remain subject to examination in the
company’s major tax jurisdictions are:
United
States – federal
|
2007
|
|||
United
States – states
|
2002
- 2007
|
|||
China
|
2006
- 2007
|
|||
Denmark
|
2006
- 2007
|
|||
Mexico
|
2006
- 2007
|
|||
Philippines
|
2004
- 2007
|
|||
South
Korea
|
2004
- 2007
|
|||
Spain
|
2005
- 2007
|
|||
Taiwan
|
2005
- 2007
|
|||
United
Kingdom
|
2006
- 2007
|
5
D) Fair
Value Measures
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”. This statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosure about fair value measurements.
This
statement is effective for interim reporting periods in fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. The company adopted SFAS No. 157 on December 30, 2007
(first day of fiscal year 2008).
FASB
Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157” delays the effective date of the application of SFAS No. 157
to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis. The company adopted
SFAS No. 157 with the exception of the application of the statement to
non-recurring nonfinancial assets and liabilities. Non-recurring nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities for which the company has not applied the
provisions of SFAS No. 157 primarily include those measured at fair value
in goodwill and long-lived asset impairment testing, those initially measured
at
fair value in a business combination, and nonfinancial liabilities for exit
or
disposal activities.
SFAS
No.
157 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or
paid
to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal most advantageous
market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into the
following levels:
Level
1 –
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level
2 –
Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either
directly or indirectly.
Level
3 –
Unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions.
The
company’s financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis
are categorized using the fair value hierarchy at September 27, 2008 are as
follows (in thousands):
Fair Value
|
Fair Value
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Financial
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||
None
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Financial
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
—
|
12
|
—
|
12
|
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115.” This statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement
is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Upon adoption,
the
company has elected to not apply SFAS No. 159 to measure selected financial
instruments and certain other items; therefore, there was no impact to the
financial statements upon adoption. Subsequent to the initial adoption of SFAS
No. 159, the company has not made any elections during the three and nine months
ended September 27, 2008.
6
2) |
Acquisitions
and Purchase Accounting
|
Jade
On
April
1, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Jade Products Company (“Jade”), a leading manufacturer of commercial and
residential cooking equipment from Maytag Corporation ("Maytag") for an
aggregate purchase price of $7.4 million in cash plus transaction costs.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements.
The
final
allocation of cash paid for the Jade acquisition is summarized as follows (in
thousands):
Apr. 1, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
6,727
|
$
|
(2,357
|
)
|
$
|
4,370
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
2,029
|
—
|
2,029
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
250
|
2,858
|
3,108
|
|||||||
Other
intangibles
|
1,590
|
—
|
1,590
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,205
|
)
|
(50
|
)
|
(3,255
|
)
|
||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
7,391
|
$
|
451
|
$
|
7,842
|
The
goodwill and other intangibles of $1.4 million associated with the trade name,
are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets", from the date of acquisition. Other intangibles of
$0.2 million allocated to customer relationships are to be amortized over a
period of 10 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of Jade are allocated to
the
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These
assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Carter-Hoffmann
On
June
29, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Carter-Hoffmann (“Carter-Hoffmann”), a leading manufacturer of commercial
cooking and warming equipment, from Carrier Commercial Refrigeration
Inc.,
a
subsidiary of Carrier Corporation, which is a unit of United Technologies
Corporation, for
an
aggregate purchase price of $15.9 million in cash plus transaction costs.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements.
7
The
final
allocation of cash paid for the Carter-Hoffmann acquisition is summarized as
follows (in thousands):
Jun. 29, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
7,912
|
$
|
(2,125
|
)
|
$
|
5,787
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
2,264
|
—
|
2,264
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
9,452
|
(1,254
|
)
|
8,198
|
||||||
Other
intangibles
|
—
|
3,910
|
3,910
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,646
|
)
|
(50
|
)
|
(3,696
|
)
|
||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(54
|
)
|
—
|
(54
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
15,928
|
$
|
481
|
$
|
16,409
|
The
goodwill and $2.3 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name
are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other
intangibles also includes $1.6 million allocated to customer relationships
are
to be amortized over a period of 4 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of
Carter-Hoffmann are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group
for
segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for
tax
purposes.
MP
Equipment
On
July
2, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
MP Equipment (“MP Equipment”), a leading manufacturer of food processing
equipment for a purchase price of $15.0 million in cash plus transaction costs.
During the quarter ended September 27, 2008, additional payments amounting
to
$3.0 million were made to the sellers pursuant to the agreement upon the
business reaching certain profit targets.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements.
The
final
allocation of cash paid for the MP Equipment acquisition is summarized as
follows (in thousands):
Jul. 2, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
5,315
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
5,315
|
||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
297
|
(152
|
)
|
145
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
9,290
|
2,044
|
11,334
|
|||||||
Other
intangibles
|
6,420
|
(770
|
)
|
5,650
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
16
|
—
|
16
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(4,018
|
)
|
(46
|
)
|
(4,064
|
)
|
||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(2,127
|
)
|
2,000
|
(127
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
15,193
|
$
|
3,076
|
$
|
18,269
|
8
The
goodwill and $3.3 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name
are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other
intangibles also includes $0.3 million allocated to backlog, $0.3 million
allocated to developed technology and $1.8 million allocated to customer
relationships which are to be amortized over periods of 6 months, 5 years and
5
years, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of MP Equipment are
allocated to the Food Processing Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes.
These assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Wells
Bloomfield
On
August
3, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Wells Bloomfield (“Wells Bloomfield”), a leading manufacturer of commercial
cooking and beverage equipment from Carrier Commercial Refrigeration
Inc.,
a
subsidiary of Carrier Corporation, which is a unit of United Technologies
Corporation, for
an
aggregate purchase price of $28.4 million in cash plus transaction costs.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements.
The
final
allocation of cash paid for the Wells Bloomfield acquisition is summarized
as
follows (in thousands):
Aug. 3, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2
|
||||
Current
assets
|
15,133
|
(838
|
)
|
14,295
|
||||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
3,961
|
(87
|
)
|
3,874
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
5,835
|
3,135
|
8,970
|
|||||||
Other
intangibles
|
8,130
|
(200
|
)
|
7,930
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
21
|
—
|
21
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(4,277
|
)
|
(1,587
|
)
|
(5,864
|
)
|
||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
28,805
|
$
|
423
|
$
|
29,228
|
The
goodwill and $5.5 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name
are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other
intangibles of $2.4 million allocated to customer relationships are to be
amortized over a period of 4 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of Wells
Bloomfield are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for
segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for
tax
purposes.
9
Star
On
December 31, 2007, the company acquired the stock of New Star International
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Star”), a leading manufacturer of commercial
cooking equipment for an aggregate purchase price of $188.4 million in cash
plus
transaction costs.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Star acquisition is summarized
as
follows (in thousands):
Dec.
31, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Sep.
27, 2008
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$
|
376
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
376
|
||||
Current
assets
|
27,783
|
—
|
27,783
|
|||||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
8,225
|
—
|
8,225
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
101,365
|
350
|
101,715
|
|||||||
Other
intangibles
|
75,150
|
—
|
75,150
|
|||||||
Other
assets
|
71
|
—
|
71
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(10,205
|
)
|
(164
|
)
|
(10,369
|
)
|
||||
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
(8,837
|
)
|
—
|
(8,837
|
)
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(4.295
|
)
|
—
|
(4,295
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
189,633
|
$
|
186
|
$
|
189,819
|
The
goodwill and $47.0 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name
are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other
intangibles also includes $0.4 million allocated to backlog, $3.8 million
allocated to developed technology and $24.0 million allocated to customer
relationships which are to be amortized over periods of 1 month, 7 years and
7
years, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Star are allocated to
the
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These
assets are not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
10
Pro
forma Financial Information
The
following unaudited pro forma results of operations for the year ended December
29, 2007, assumes the Star acquisition was completed on December 31, 2006.
The pro forma results include adjustments to reflect additional interest expense
to fund the acquisition, amortization of intangibles associated with the
acquisition, and the effects of adjustments made to the carrying value of
certain assets.
December 29, 2007
|
December 30, 2006
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
592,513
|
$
|
487,283
|
|||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
51,769
|
$
|
40,672
|
|||
Net
earnings per share:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
3.30
|
$
|
2.66
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
3.06
|
$
|
2.46
|
The
pro
forma financial information presented above is not necessarily indicative of
either the results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisition
of
Star, been effective on December 31, 2006 or of future operations of the
company. Also, the pro forma financial information does not reflect the
costs which the company has or may incur to integrate Star.
Giga
On
April
22, 2008, the company acquired the stock of Giga
Grandi Cucine S.r.l. (“Giga”),
a
leading European
manufacturer of ranges, ovens and steam cooking equipment for a purchase price
of $9.7 million in cash plus transaction costs. The company also assumed $5.1
million of debt included as part of the net assets of Giga.
An
additional deferred payment of $5.4 million is also due the seller ratably
over
a three year period. The purchase price is subject to adjustment based upon
a
working capital provision within the purchase agreement.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Giga acquisition is summarized
as
follows (in thousands):
Apr. 22, 2008
|
Adjustments
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$
|
222
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
222
|
||||
Current
assets
|
14,645
|
—
|
14,645
|
|||||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
628
|
—
|
628
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
10,135
|
25
|
10,160
|
|||||||
Other
intangibles
|
3,330
|
—
|
3,330
|
|||||||
Other
assets
|
473
|
—
|
473
|
|||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
(5,105
|
)
|
—
|
(5,105
|
)
|
|||||
Current
liabilities
|
(8,757
|
)
|
—
|
(8,757
|
)
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(5,431
|
)
|
—
|
(5,431
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
10,140
|
$
|
25
|
$
|
10,165
|
11
The
goodwill and $2.4 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name
are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other
intangibles also includes $0.1 million allocated to backlog and $0.8 million
allocated to customer relationships, which are to be amortized over periods
of 3
months and 4 to 10 years, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Giga
are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment
reporting purposes. These assets are not expected to be deductible for tax
purposes.
Frifri
On
April
23, 2008, the company acquired the assets of FriFri
aro SA (“FriFri”),
a
leading European
supplier of frying systems for an aggregate purchase price of $3.4 million
plus
transaction costs.
The
purchase price is subject to adjustment based upon a working capital provision
within the purchase agreement.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Frifri acquisition is summarized
as
follows (in thousands):
Apr. 23, 2008
|
Adjustments
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$
|
469
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
469
|
||||
Current
assets
|
4,263
|
127
|
4,390
|
|||||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
460
|
—
|
460
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
1,155
|
(147
|
)
|
1,008
|
||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(2,828
|
)
|
29
|
(2,799
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
3,519
|
$
|
9
|
$
|
3,528
|
The
goodwill is subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Goodwill
of Frifri is allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment
reporting purposes. These assets are not expected to be deductible for tax
purposes.
TurboChef
On
August
12, 2008, the company announced that it had agreed to acquire TurboChef
Technologies, Inc. (“TurboChef”). At the effective time of the Merger (the
“Effective Time”), each issued and outstanding share of TurboChef’s common stock
will be automatically converted into the right to receive 0.0486 shares (the
“Exchange Ratio”) of the common stock of Middleby (“Middleby Common Stock”) and
$3.67 in cash (the “Cash Consideration”, and together with Middleby Common
Stock, the “Merger Consideration”) for a total value of $6.47 based on
Middleby’s closing stock price of $57.60 on August 11, 2008, the last trading
date prior to the announcement of the contemplated transaction. Consummation
of
the Merger is subject to various conditions, including the approval of
TurboChef’s stockholders and other customary closing
conditions.
12
3)
|
Stock
Split
|
On
May 3,
2007, the company’s Board of Directors authorized a two-for-one split of the
company’s common stock in the form of a stock dividend. The stock dividend was
paid on June 15, 2007 to company shareholders of record as of June 1, 2007.
The
company’s common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on June 18, 2007.
All references in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto to net earnings per share and the number of shares have been
adjusted to reflect this stock split.
4)
|
Litigation
Matters
|
From
time
to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The
company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers
compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The
company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or
outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses.
A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these
contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance
coverage. The reserve requirement may change in the future due to new
developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy
in
dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows of the company.
5)
|
Recently
Issued Accounting
Standards
|
In
December 2007, the FAS issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations”. This
statement provides companies with principles and requirements on how an acquirer
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree
as well as the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business
combination. This statement also requires certain disclosures to enable users
of
the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of
the
business combination. Acquisition costs associated with the business combination
will generally be expensed as incurred. This statement is effective for business
combinations occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
Early adoption of FASB Statement No. 141R is not permitted. The company is
evaluating the impact the application of this guidance will have on the
company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The company
will adopt this statement for acquisitions consummated after the statement’s
effective date.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
“Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of
ARB No. 51”. This statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary
and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Upon its adoption, effective
as of
the beginning of the company’s 2009 fiscal year, noncontrolling interests will
be classified as equity in the company’s financial statements and income and
comprehensive income attributed to the noncontrolling interest will be included
in the company’s income and comprehensive income. The provisions of this
standard must be applied retrospectively upon adoption. The company does
not
anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have a material impact
on its
financial statements.
13
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This statement
amends SFAS No. 133 to require enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative
and hedging activities. This Statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early application encouraged. The company is evaluating the impact the
application of this guidance will have on the company’s financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.” This statement identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
in
the United States. This statement directs the hierarchy to the entity, rather
than the independent auditors, as the entity is responsible for selecting
accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. This statement is effective
60
days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board amendments to remove the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting
principles from the auditing standards. The company does not anticipate that
the
adoption of SFAS No. 162 will have a material impact on its financial
statements.
6) |
Other
Comprehensive Income
|
The
company reports changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from
investments by owners and distributions to owners, in accordance with SFAS
No.
130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income."
Components
of other comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
16,290
|
$
|
14,056
|
$
|
46,588
|
$
|
37,358
|
|||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
(2,556
|
)
|
320
|
(1,571
|
)
|
596
|
|||||||
Unrealized
gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
20
|
(202
|
)
|
240
|
(301
|
)
|
|||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
13,754
|
$
|
14,174
|
$
|
45,257
|
$
|
37,653
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income is comprised of unrecognized pension benefit costs
of
$(0.9) million, net of taxes of $(0.6) million as of September 27, 2008 and
December 29, 2007, foreign currency translation adjustments of $0.1 million
as
of September 27, 2008 and $1.7 million as of December 29, 2007, and an
unrealized gain on interest rate swaps of $0.2 million, net of taxes of $0.4
million, as of September 27, 2008.
14
7)
|
Inventories
|
Inventories
are composed of material, labor and overhead and are stated at the lower of
cost
or market. Costs for inventory at two of the company's manufacturing facilities
have been determined using the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. These
inventories under the LIFO method amounted to $16.8 million at September 27,
2008 and $16.4 million at December 29, 2007 and represented approximately 17%
and 25% of the total inventory in each respective period. Costs for all other
inventory have been determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method.
The company estimates reserves for inventory obsolescence and shrinkage based
on
its judgment of future realization. Inventories at September 27, 2008 and
December 29, 2007 are as follows:
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Dec. 29, 2007
|
||||||
(in thousands)
|
|||||||
Raw
materials and parts
|
$
|
36,473
|
$
|
25,047
|
|||
Work-in-process
|
21,782
|
11,033
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
37,485
|
30,669
|
|||||
95,740
|
66,749
|
||||||
LIFO
adjustment
|
(1,380
|
)
|
(311
|
)
|
|||
$
|
94,360
|
$
|
66,438
|
8) |
Accrued
Expenses
|
Accrued
expenses consist of the following:
Sep.
27, 2008
|
Dec,
29, 2007
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Accrued
payroll and related expenses
|
$
|
20,874
|
$
|
21,448
|
|||
Accrued
warranty
|
13,190
|
12,276
|
|||||
Accrued
customer rebates
|
12,768
|
16,326
|
|||||
Accrued
product liability and workers comp
|
10,121
|
6,978
|
|||||
Advance
customer deposits
|
8,009
|
7,971
|
|||||
Accrued
commission
|
5,214
|
4,265
|
|||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
28,360
|
26,317
|
|||||
$
|
98,536
|
$
|
95,581
|
15
9) |
Warranty
Costs
|
In
the
normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific
product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period
in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on
contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically
adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts
that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from
amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made
as
changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
A
rollforward of the warranty reserve is as follows:
Nine Months Ended
|
||||
Sep. 27, 2008
|
||||
(in thousands)
|
||||
Beginning
balance
|
$
|
12,276
|
||
Warranty
reserve related to acquisitions
|
1,442
|
|||
Warranty
expense
|
10,943
|
|||
Warranty
claims
|
(11,471
|
)
|
||
Ending
balance
|
$
|
13,190
|
10) |
Financing
Arrangements
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Dec. 29, 2007
|
||||||
(in thousands)
|
|||||||
Senior
secured revolving credit line
|
$
|
247,800
|
$
|
91,350
|
|||
Foreign
loan
|
9,853
|
4,847
|
|||||
Total
debt
|
$
|
257,653
|
$
|
96,197
|
|||
Less:
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
7,803
|
2,683
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
$
|
249,850
|
$
|
93,514
|
During
the third quarter of 2008 the company amended its senior secured credit
facility. The
original agreement provided for $450.0 million of availability under a revolving
credit line. The amendment currently provides for $497.5 million of availability
under a revolving credit line. As
of
September 27, 2008, the company had $247.8 million of borrowings outstanding
under this facility. The company also has $5.6 million in outstanding letters
of
credit, which reduces the borrowing availability under the revolving credit
line.
Borrowings
under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate at
1.25% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate
and the Federal Funds Rate. At September 27, 2008 the average interest rate
on
the senior debt amounted to 3.87%. The interest rates on borrowings under the
senior bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based on the company’s defined
indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis. Additionally, a commitment
fee based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged on the unused portion of the
revolving credit line. This variable commitment fee amounted to 0.25% as of
September 27, 2008.
16
In
August
2006, the company completed its acquisition of Houno A/S in Denmark. This
acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt facilities with
borrowings in Danish Krone. On September 27, 2008 these facilities
amounted to $4.7 million in US dollars, including $2.5 million outstanding
under
a revolving credit facility and $2.2 million of a term loan. The interest
rate on the revolving credit facility is assessed at 1.25% above Euro LIBOR,
which amounted to 6.5% on September 27, 2008. The term loan matures in 2013
and
the interest rate is assessed at 6.4%.
In
April
2008, the company completed its acquisition of Giga Grandi Cucine S.r.l in
Italy. This acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt
facilities with borrowings in denominated in Euro. On September 27, 2008
these facilities amounted to $5.2 million in US dollars. The borrowings
under these facilities are collateralized by the receivables of the
company. The interest rate on the credit facilities is tied to six month
Euro LIBOR. The facilities mature in April of 2015.
The
company believes that its current capital resources, including cash and cash
equivalents, cash generated from operations, funds available from its revolving
credit facility and access to the credit and capital markets will be sufficient
to finance its operations, debt service obligations, capital expenditures,
product development and integration expenditures for the foreseeable
future.
The company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for fixed rates. As of September 27, 2008 the company had the following interest rate swaps in effect:
Fixed
|
||||||||||
Notional
|
Interest
|
Effective
|
Maturity
|
|||||||
Amount
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Date
|
|||||||
$
10,000,000
|
5.030
|
%
|
3/3/2006
|
12/21/2009
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.520
|
%
|
2/19/2008
|
2/19/2009
|
||||||
$ 20,000,000
|
2.635
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2009
|
||||||
$ 25,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
1/14/2008
|
1/14/2010
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.920
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2010
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.785
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/8/2010
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
3.033
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/7/2011
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.820
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2009
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
3.590
|
%
|
6/10/2008
|
6/10/2011
|
||||||
$ 20,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
6/10/2008
|
6/10/2010
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
3.460
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/6/2011
|
||||||
$
15,000,000
|
3.130
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/7/2010
|
||||||
$
20,000,000
|
2.800
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/8/2009
|
||||||
$ 25,000,000
|
3.670
|
%
|
9/26/2008
|
9/23/2011
|
The
terms
of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital
expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, ratios of indebtedness
of 3.5 debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(“EBITDA”) and fixed charge coverage of 1.25 EBITDA to fixed charges. The credit
agreement also provides that if a material adverse change in the company’s
business operations or conditions occurs, the lender could declare an event
of
default. Under terms of the agreement a material adverse effect is defined
as
(a) a material adverse change in, or a material adverse effect upon, the
operations, business properties, condition (financial and otherwise) or
prospects of the company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material
impairment of the ability of the company to perform under the loan agreements
and to avoid any event of default; or (c) a material adverse effect upon the
legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability against the company of
any
loan document. A material adverse effect is determined on a subjective basis
by
the company's creditors. The credit facility is secured by the capital stock
of
the company’s domestic subsidiaries, 65% of the capital stock of the company’s
foreign subsidiaries and substantially all other assets of the company. At
September 27, 2008, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant
to
its borrowing agreements.
17
11) |
Financial
Instruments
|
In
June
1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and
Hedging Activities". SFAS No. 133, as amended, establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments. The statement requires an entity
to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure those
instruments at fair value. Derivatives that do not qualify as a hedge must
be
adjusted to fair value in earnings. If the derivative does qualify as a hedge
under SFAS No. 133, changes in the fair value will either be offset against
the
change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments
or
recognized in other accumulated comprehensive income until the hedged item
is
recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a hedge's change in fair
value will be immediately recognized in earnings.
Foreign
Exchange:
The
company has entered into derivative instruments, principally forward contracts
to reduce exposures pertaining to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. As
of
September 27, 2008, the company had no forward contracts
outstanding.
Interest
Rate:
The
company has entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate applicable
to certain of its variable-rate debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for
a
fixed rates. The company has designated these swaps as cash flow hedges and
all
changes in fair value of the swaps are recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income. As of September 27, 2008, the fair value of these
instruments was less than $0.1 million. The change in fair value of these swap
agreements in the first nine months of 2008 was a gain of $0.8 million, net
of
taxes.
Fixed
|
Changes
|
|||||||||||||||
Notional
|
Interest
|
Effective
|
Maturity
|
Fair Value
|
In Fair Value
|
|||||||||||
Amount
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Date
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
(net of taxes)
|
|||||||||||
$
10,000,000
|
5.030
|
%
|
3/03/2006
|
12/21/2009
|
$
|
(234,000
|
)
|
$
|
137,0001
|
|||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.520
|
%
|
2/19/2008
|
2/19/2009
|
$
|
32,000
|
$
|
36,000
|
||||||||
$ 20,000,000
|
2.635
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2009
|
$
|
49,000
|
$
|
69,000
|
||||||||
$ 25,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
1/14/2008
|
1/14/2010
|
$
|
(91,000
|
)
|
$
|
224,000
|
|||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.920
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2010
|
$
|
30,000
|
$
|
82,000
|
||||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.785
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/8/2010
|
$
|
22,000
|
$
|
42,000
|
||||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
3.033
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/7/2011
|
$
|
49,000
|
$
|
78,000
|
||||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.820
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2009
|
$
|
92,000
|
$
|
115,000
|
||||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
3.590
|
%
|
6/10/2008
|
6/10/2011
|
$
|
(8,000
|
)
|
$
|
16,000
|
|||||||
$ 20,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
6/10/2008
|
6/10/2010
|
$
|
(39,000
|
)
|
$
|
(28,000
|
)
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
3.460
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/6/2011
|
$
|
41,000
|
$
|
24,000
|
||||||||
$
15,000,000
|
3.130
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/7/2010
|
$
|
42,000
|
$
|
25,000
|
||||||||
$ 20,000,000
|
2.800
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/8/2009
|
$
|
52,000
|
$
|
31,000
|
||||||||
$ 25,000,000
|
3.670
|
%
|
9/26/2008
|
9/23/2011
|
$
|
(49,000
|
)
|
$
|
(30,000
|
)
|
1 |
Previous
to the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2008, this swap had not been
designated as an effective cash flow hedge. The swap was designated
as an
effective cash flow hedge during the quarter ended March 29, 2008.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 133, the net reduction of $0.2 million in
the
fair value of this swap prior to the designation date has been recorded
as
a loss in earnings for the first quarter
2008.
|
18
12) |
Segment
Information
|
The
company operates in three reportable operating segments defined by management
reporting structure and operating activities.
The
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group manufactures cooking equipment for the
restaurant and institutional kitchen industry. This business segment has
manufacturing facilities in California, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada,
New Hampshire, North Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Denmark, Italy, the
Philippines and Switzerland. The
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group manufactures conveyor ovens, convection
ovens, fryers, ranges, toasters, combi ovens, steamers, broilers, deck ovens,
baking ovens, proofers, beverage systems and beverage dispensing equipment,
counter-top cooking and warming equipment. This business segment’s principal
product lines include Middleby Marshall® and CTX® conveyor oven equipment,
Blodgett® convection ovens, conveyor ovens, deck oven equipment, Blodgett Combi®
cooking equipment, Blodgett Range® ranges, Nu-Vu® baking ovens and proofers,
Pitco Frialator® fryer equipment, Southbend® ranges, convection ovens and
heavy-duty cooking equipment, Toastmaster® toasters and counterline cooking and
warming equipment, Jade Range® ranges and ovens, Carter Hoffmann® warming,
holding and transporting equipment, Bloomfield® beverage systems and beverage
dispensing equipment, Wells® convection
ovens, counterline cooking equipment and ventless cooking systems,
Star®
light duty cooking equipment, Holman® toasting equipment, Lang® ovens and
ranges, Houno® combi-ovens and baking ovens, Giga® ranges, ovens and steam
equipment, Frifri® frying systems and MagiKitch'n® charbroilers and catering
equipment.
The
Food
Processing Equipment Group manufactures cooking and packaging equipment for
the
food processing industry. This business segment has manufacturing facilities
in
Georgia and Wisconsin. Its principal products include Alkar®
batch
ovens, conveyorized ovens and continuous process ovens, RapidPak®
food
packaging machinery and MP Equipment®
breading, battering, mixing, forming, and slicing equipment.
The
International Distribution Division provides integrated sales, export
management, distribution and installation services through its operations in
China, India, Lebanon, Mexico, the Philippines, Russia, South Korea, Spain,
Sweden, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The division sells the company’s product
lines and certain non-competing complementary product lines throughout the
world. For a local country distributor or dealer, the company is able to provide
a centralized source of foodservice equipment with complete export management
and product support services.
The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. The chief decision maker evaluates
individual segment performance based on operating income. Management believes
that intersegment sales are made at established arms-length transfer
prices.
19
Net
Sales Summary
(dollars
in thousands)
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||
Business
Divisions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice
|
$
|
138,327
|
83.1
|
$
|
109,667
|
80.6
|
$
|
419,212
|
83.7
|
$
|
290,597
|
81.9
|
|||||||||||||
Food
Processing
|
21,079
|
12.7
|
20,780
|
15.3
|
61,435
|
12.3
|
46,329
|
13.0
|
|||||||||||||||||
International
Distribution(1)
|
16,162
|
9.7
|
15,059
|
11.1
|
47,380
|
9.4
|
43,156
|
12.2
|
|||||||||||||||||
Intercompany
sales (2)
|
(9,096
|
)
|
(5.5
|
)
|
(9,510
|
)
|
(7.0
|
)
|
(27,159
|
)
|
(5.4
|
)
|
(25,143
|
)
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
166,472
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
135,996
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
500,868
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
354,939
|
100.0
|
%
|
(1) |
Consists
of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products
manufactured by third parties.
|
(2) |
Represents
the elimination of sales from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group
to the International Distribution Division
|
20
The
following table summarizes the results of operations for the company's business
segments(1)(in
thousands):
|
|
Commercial
|
Food
|
International
|
Corporate
|
||||||||||||||
Foodservice
|
Processing
|
Distribution
|
and Other(2)
|
Eliminations(3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
Three
months ended September 27, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
138,327
|
$
|
21,079
|
$
|
16,162
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(9,096
|
)
|
$
|
166,472
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
34,068
|
4,189
|
1,341
|
(9,102
|
)
|
457
|
30,953
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
1,281
|
98
|
53
|
39
|
—
|
1,471
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
678
|
12
|
(40
|
)
|
15
|
—
|
665
|
||||||||||||
Nine
months ended September 27, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
419,212
|
$
|
61,435
|
$
|
47,380
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(27,159
|
)
|
$
|
500,868
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
102,272
|
10,275
|
3,507
|
(27,251
|
)
|
658
|
89,461
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
3,926
|
305
|
152
|
111
|
—
|
4,494
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
3,122
|
88
|
161
|
37
|
—
|
3,408
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
527,204
|
71,495
|
27,780
|
30,774
|
(9,218
|
)
|
648,035
|
||||||||||||
Long-lived
assets(4)
|
367,426
|
43,656
|
649
|
11,172
|
—
|
422,903
|
|||||||||||||
Three
months ended September 29, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
109,667
|
$
|
20,780
|
$
|
15,059
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(9,510
|
)
|
$
|
135,996
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
25,155
|
4,009
|
1,245
|
(5,267
|
)
|
282
|
25,424
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
898
|
131
|
41
|
36
|
—
|
1,106
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
508
|
53
|
52
|
7
|
—
|
620
|
|||||||||||||
Nine
months ended September 29, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
290,597
|
$
|
46,329
|
$
|
43,156
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(25,143
|
)
|
$
|
354.939
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
69,234
|
10,026
|
3,227
|
(17,748
|
)
|
693
|
65,432
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
2,401
|
381
|
125
|
109
|
—
|
3,016
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
1,436
|
65
|
107
|
81
|
—
|
1,689
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
280,999
|
73,931
|
28,741
|
11,741
|
(8,116
|
)
|
387,296
|
||||||||||||
Long-lived
assets(4)
|
166,241
|
43,948
|
456
|
10,430
|
—
|
221,075
|
(1) |
Non-operating
expenses are not allocated to the operating segments. Non-operating
expenses consist of interest expense and deferred financing
amortization, foreign exchange gains and losses and other income
and
expense items outside of income from
operations.
|
(2) |
Includes
corporate and other general company assets and
operations.
|
(3) |
Includes
elimination of intercompany sales, profit in inventory and intercompany
receivables. Intercompany sale transactions are predominantly
from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International
Distribution Division.
|
(4) |
Long-lived
assets of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group includes assets
located in the Philippines, which amounted to $1,848 and $1,937 in
third
quarter 2008 and 2007, respectively, assets located in Denmark which
amounted to $2,402 and $1,645 in third quarter 2008 and 2007,
respectively, assets located in Italy which amounted to $14,906 in
third
quarter of 2008 and assets located in Switzerland which amounted
to $1,229
in third quarter 2008.
|
21
Net
sales
by major geographic region, including those sales from the Commercial
Foodservice
Equipment Group direct to international customers, were as follows (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
||||||||||
United
States and Canada
|
$
|
133,923
|
$
|
109,291
|
$
|
405,495
|
$
|
286,832
|
|||||
Asia
|
9,242
|
10,003
|
25,752
|
21,645
|
|||||||||
Europe
and Middle East
|
18,672
|
11,994
|
55,532
|
35,266
|
|||||||||
Latin
America
|
4,635
|
4,708
|
14,089
|
11,196
|
|||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
166,472
|
$
|
135,996
|
$
|
500,868
|
$
|
354,939
|
13) |
Employee
Retirement Plans
|
(a) Pension
Plans
The
company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit plan for its union
employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility. Benefits are determined based upon
retirement age and years of service with the company. This defined benefit
plan
was frozen on April 30, 2002 and no further benefits accrue to the participants
beyond this date. Plan participants will receive or continue to receive payments
for benefits earned on or prior to April 30, 2002 upon reaching retirement
age.
The employees participating in the defined benefit plan were enrolled in a
newly
established 401K savings plan on September 30, 2002, further described below.
The
company also maintains a retirement benefit agreement with its Chairman. The
retirement benefits are based upon a percentage of the Chairman’s final base
salary. Additionally, the company maintains a retirement plan for non-employee
directors. The plan provides for an annual benefit upon a change in control
of
the company or retirement from the Board of Directors at age 70, equal to 100%
of the director’s last annual retainer, payable for a number of years equal to
the director’s years of service up to a maximum of 10 years.
Contributions
under the union plan are funded in accordance with provisions of The Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. There are no contributions expected
to
be made in 2008. Contributions to the directors' plan are based upon actual
retirement benefits as they retire.
(b) 401K
Savings Plans
The
company maintains two separate defined contribution 401K savings plans covering
all employees in the United States. These two plans separately cover the union
employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility and all other remaining union and
non-union employees in the United States. The company makes profit sharing
contributions to the various plans in accordance with the requirements of the
plan. Profit sharing contributions for the Elgin Union 401K savings plans are
made in accordance with the agreement.
22
14) |
Treasury
Stock
|
In
July
1998, the company’s Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program that
authorized the purchase of common shares in open market purchases. As of
September 27, 2008, 1,167,868 shares had been purchased under the 1998 stock
repurchase program.
23
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations.
Informational
Notes
This
report contains forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor created
by
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company cautions
readers that these projections are based upon future results or events and
are
highly dependent upon a variety of important factors which could cause such
results or events to differ materially from any forward-looking statements
which
may be deemed to have been made in this report, or which are otherwise made
by
or on behalf of the company. Such factors include, but are not limited to,
volatility in earnings resulting from goodwill impairment losses which may
occur
irregularly and in varying amounts; variability in financing costs; quarterly
variations in operating results; dependence on key customers; international
exposure; foreign exchange and political risks affecting international sales;
ability to protect trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property;
changing market conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing;
the
timely development and market acceptance of the company’s products; the
availability and cost of raw materials; and other risks detailed herein and
from
time-to-time in the company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings,
including the company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A and Item 1A of this
Form 10-Q.
The
economic outlook for 2009 is extremely uncertain at this time, with substantial
turmoil in financial markets and unprecedented government intervention around
the world. As a global business, the company's operating results are
impacted by the health of the North American, European, Asian and Latin American
economies. While the response by governments and central banks around the world
may restore global liquidity, the depth and duration of economic decline and
the
timing and strength of the recovery are very uncertain.
On
August
12, 2008, the company announced that it had agreed to acquire TurboChef
Technologies, Inc. (“TurboChef”). At the effective time of the Merger (the
"Effective Time"), each issued and outstanding share of TurboChef's common
stock
will be automatically converted into the right to receive 0.0486 shares (the
"Exchange Ratio") of the common stock of Middleby ("Middleby Common Stock")
and
$3.67 in cash (the "Cash Consideration", and together with Middleby Common
Stock, the "Merger Consideration") for a total value of $6.47 based on
Middleby's closing stock price of $57.60 on August 11, 2008, the last trading
date prior to the announcement of the contemplated transaction. Consummation
of
the Merger is subject to various conditions, including the approval of
TurboChef's stockholders and other customary closing conditions.
24
Net
Sales Summary
(dollars
in thousands)
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||
Business Divisions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice
|
$
|
138,327
|
83.1
|
$
|
109,667
|
80.6
|
$
|
419,212
|
83.7
|
$
|
290,597
|
81.9
|
|||||||||||||
Food
Processing
|
21,079
|
12.7
|
20,780
|
15.3
|
61,435
|
12.3
|
46,329
|
13.0
|
|||||||||||||||||
International
Distribution(1)
|
16,162
|
9.7
|
15,059
|
11.1
|
47,380
|
9.4
|
43,156
|
12.2
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany
sales (2)
|
(9,096
|
)
|
(5.5
|
)
|
(9,510
|
)
|
(7.0
|
)
|
(27,159
|
)
|
(5.4
|
)
|
(25,143
|
)
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
166,472
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
135,996
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
500,868
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
354,939
|
100.0
|
%
|
(1) |
Consists
of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products
manufactured by third parties.
|
(2) |
Represents
the elimination of sales from the Commercial Foodservice
Equipment Group to the International Distribution
Division.
|
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of earnings items
as
a percentage of net sales for the periods.
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
Sep. 29, 2007
|
||||||||||
Net sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
61.1
|
62.2
|
61.9
|
61.3
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
38.9
|
37.8
|
38.1
|
38.7
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
20.3
|
19.1
|
20.2
|
20.3
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
18.6
|
18.7
|
17.9
|
18.4
|
|||||||||
Net
interest expense and deferred financing amortization
|
1.9
|
1.2
|
2.0
|
1.2
|
|||||||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
0.5
|
(0.2
|
)
|
0.4
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
16.2
|
17.7
|
15.5
|
17.5
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
6.4
|
7.4
|
6.2
|
7.0
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
9.8
|
%
|
10.3
|
%
|
9.3
|
%
|
10.5
|
%
|
25
Three
Months Ended September 27, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended
September
29, 2007
NET
SALES. Net
sales
for the third quarter of fiscal 2008 were $166.5 million as compared to $136.0
million in the third quarter of 2007.
Net
sales
at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group amounted to $138.3 million in
the
third quarter of 2008 as compared to $109.7 million in the prior year quarter.
Net
sales
from the acquisitions of Star, Giga and Frifri, which were acquired on December
31, 2007, April 22, 2008 and April 23, 2008, respectively, accounted for an
increase of $32.4 million during the third quarter of 2008. Excluding the impact
of acquisitions, net sales of commercial foodservice equipment decreased $2.2
million due to a sudden drop in orders late in the third quarter that was caused
by the disruption in the financial markets.
Net
sales
for the Food Processing Equipment Group amounted to $21.1 million in the third
quarter of 2008 as compared to $20.8 million in the prior year quarter. Net
sales of food processing equipment increased due to increased sales of new
products.
Net
sales
at the International Distribution Division increased by $1.1 million to $16.2
million or 7%, reflecting higher sales in Asia, Europe and Latin America.
Increased international sales reflect increased business with restaurant chains
and increased pricing competitiveness driven by the weakened US dollar.
.
GROSS
PROFIT. Gross
profit increased to $64.7 million in the third quarter of 2008 from $51.4
million in the prior year period, reflecting the impact of higher sales volumes.
The gross margin rate was 38.9% in the third quarter of 2008 as compared to
37.8% in the prior year quarter. The net increase in the gross margin rate
reflects:
·
|
Improved
margins at certain of the newly acquired operating companies which
are in
continuing the process of being integrated within the
company.
|
·
|
Higher
margins associated with new product
sales.
|
·
|
The
adverse impact of steel costs which have risen significantly from
the
prior year quarter.
|
26
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined
selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $26.0 million
in
the third quarter of 2007 to $33.8 million in the third quarter of 2008. As
a
percentage of net sales, operating expenses decreased from 19.1% in the third
quarter of 2007 to 20.3% in the third quarter of 2008. Selling expenses
increased from $13.5 million in the third quarter of 2007 to $16.8 million
in
the third quarter of 2008, reflecting $3.1 million of incremental costs
associated with the acquisitions of Star completed on December 31, 2007, Giga
completed on April 22, 2008 and Frifri completed on April 23, 2008. General
and
administrative expenses increased from $12.5 million in the third quarter of
2007 to $17.0 million in the third quarter of 2008. General and administrative
expenses reflect $2.2 million of costs associated with the acquired operations
of Star, Giga and Frifri. Increased general and administrative costs also
include increased non-cash stock compensation costs which increased by $0.7
million from the prior year third quarter.
NON-OPERATING
EXPENSES. Interest
and deferred financing amortization costs increased to $3.2 million in the
third
quarter of 2008 as compared to $1.6 million in the third quarter of 2007, due
to
increased borrowings resulting from recent acquisitions. Other expense was
$0.8
million in the third quarter of 2008, which primarily consisted of foreign
exchange losses, as compared to other income of $0.3 million in the prior year
third quarter.
INCOME
TAXES. A
tax
provision of $10.6 million, at an effective rate of 40%, was recorded during
the
third quarter of 2008, as compared to a $10.1 million provision at a 42%
effective rate in the prior year quarter.
Nine
Months Ended September 29, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 29,
2007
NET
SALES. Net
sales
for the nine-month period ended September 27, 2008 were $500.9 million as
compared to $354.9 million in the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007.
Net
sales
at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group amounted to $419.2 million in
the
nine-month period ended September 27, 2008 as compared to $290.5 million in
the
nine-month period ended September 29, 2007.
Net
sales
from the acquisitions of Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, Wells Bloomfield, Star, Giga
and
Frifri, which were acquired on April 1, 2007, June 29, 2007, August 3, 2007,
December 31, 2007, April 22, 2008 and April 23, 2008, respectively, accounted
for an increase of $130.1 million during the first nine months of 2008.
Excluding the impact of acquisitions, net sales of commercial foodservice
equipment decreased $2.5 million for the nine-month period ended September
27,
2008 compared to the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007.
Net
sales
for the Food Processing Equipment Group increased by $15.1 million to $61.4
million for the nine-month period ended September 27, 2008 from $46.3 million
in
the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007. Excluding the impact of
acquisitions, net sales of food processing equipment decreased $6.6 million
due
to delayed customer purchases as a result of economic uncertainties and
quarterly variations which
occur as a result of the timing of large orders.
27
Net
sales
at the International Distribution Division increased from $43.2 for the
nine-month period ended September 29, 2007 to $47.4 million for the nine-month
period ended September 27, 2008, reflecting higher sales in Latin America and
Asia, which more than offset a decline in sales in Europe, which had strong
sales in the prior year due to an oven rollout with a major restaurant chain
customer. International sales benefited from expansion of the U.S. chains
overseas and increased business with local and regional restaurant chains in
developing markets.
GROSS
PROFIT. Gross
profit increased to $190.6 million for the nine-month period ended September
27,
2008 from $137.4 million in the nine-month period, ended September 29, 2007,
reflecting the impact of higher sales volumes. The gross margin rate was 38.1%
for the nine-month period ended September 27, 2008 compared to 38.7% for the
nine-month period ended September 29, 2007. The net decrease in the gross margin
rate reflects:
·
|
Inventory
step-up charges of $2.0 million related to the acquisitions of
Star, Giga
and Frifri.
|
·
|
The
adverse impact of steel costs which have risen significantly from
the
prior year.
|
·
|
Lower
margins at certain of the newly acquired operating companies which
are in
the process of being integrated within the
company.
|
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined
selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $72.0 million
in
the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007 to $101.2 million in the
nine-month period ended September 27, 2008. As a percentage of net sales,
operating expenses decreased from 20.3% in the nine-month period ended September
29, 2007, to 20.2% in the nine-month period ended September 27, 2008, reflecting
greater leverage on higher sales volumes. Selling expenses increased from $36.6
million in the nine-month period ended September 29, 2007, to $49.7 million
in
the nine-month period ended September 27, 2008, reflecting $13.7 million of
increased costs associated with the acquired operations of Jade,
Carter-Hoffmann, MP Equipment, Wells Bloomfield, Star, Giga and Frifri. General
and administrative expenses increased from $35.4 million in the nine-month
period ended September 29, 2007, to $51.4 million in the nine-month period
ended
September 27, 2008, which includes increased costs of $11.9 million associated
with the acquired operations of Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, MP Equipment, Wells
Bloomfield, Star, Giga and Frifri. Increased general and administrative costs
also include increased non-cash compensation costs which increased by $2.9
million from the prior year nine month period.
NON-OPERATING
EXPENSES. Interest
and deferred financing amortization costs increased to $9.9 million for the
nine-month period ended September 27, 2008 from $4.1 million in the prior year
period, as a result of higher debt balances. Other expense was $1.8 million
for
the nine-month period ended September 27, 2008, which primarily consisted of
foreign exchange losses, compared to other income of $1.1 million for the
nine-month period ended September 29, 2007.
INCOME
TAXES. A
tax
provision of $31.2 million, at an effective rate of 40%, was recorded for the
first nine months of 2008 as compared to a $25.0 million provision at a 40%
effective rate in the prior year period.
28
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
During
the nine months ended September 27, 2008, cash and cash equivalents decreased
by
$0.5 million to $7.0 million at September 27, 2008 from $7.5 million at December
29, 2007. Net borrowings increased from $96.2 million at December 29, 2007
to
$257.7 million at September 27, 2008.
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES. Net
cash
provided by operating activities was $64.0 million for the nine-month period
ended September 27, 2008 compared to $46.0 million for the nine-month period
ended September 29, 2007.
During
the nine months ended September 27, 2008, working capital levels changed due
to
normal business fluctuations, including the impact of increased seasonal working
capital needs. The changes in working capital included a $0.1 million decrease
in accounts receivable, a $7.0 million increase in inventory, and a $2.1 million
decrease in accounts payable. Prepaid and other assets decreased $13.2 million
primarily due to the utilization and refund of prepaid tax balances during
the
first nine months of 2008. Accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities
also decreased by $8.2 million, reflecting second quarter payout of customer
rebates and incentive compensation in the first half of 2008 related to prior
year programs.
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES. During
the nine months ended September 27, 2008, net cash used in investing activities
amounted to $208.1 million. This includes cash utilized to complete the
acquisitions of Star, Giga and Frifri for $188.2 million, $9.9 million and
$3.1
million respectively, $1.2 million to purchase a manufacturing facility for
Carter-Hoffmann and $2.2 million of capital expenditures associated with
additions and upgrades of production equipment.
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES. Net
cash
flows provided by financing activities were $143.9 million during the nine
months ended September 27, 2008. The net increase in debt includes $156.5
million in borrowings under the company’s $497.5 million revolving credit
facility utilized to fund the company’s investing activities and the repurchase
of $12.4 million of Middleby common shares.
At
September 27, 2008, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant
to
its borrowing agreements. Management believes that future cash flows from
operating activities and borrowing availability under the revolving credit
facility will provide the company with sufficient financial resources to meet
its anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and
debt
amortization for the foreseeable future.
29
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In
December 2007, the FAS issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations”. This
statement provides companies with principles and requirements on how an acquirer
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree
as well as the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business
combination. This statement also requires certain disclosures to enable users
of
the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. Acquisition costs associated with the business combination
will generally be expensed as incurred. This statement is effective for business
combinations occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
Early adoption of FASB Statement No. 141R is not permitted. The company is
evaluating the impact the application of this guidance will have on the
company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The company
will adopt this statement for acquisitions consummated after the statement’s
effective date.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This statement
amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Upon its adoption, effective as of the
beginning of the company’s 2009 fiscal year, noncontrolling interests will be
classified as equity in the company’s financial statements and income and
comprehensive income attributed to the noncontrolling interest will be included
in the company’s income and comprehensive income. The provisions of this
standard must be applied retrospectively upon adoption. The company does not
anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have a material impact on
its
financial statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This statement
amends SFAS No. 133 to require enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative
and hedging activities. This Statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early application encouraged. The company is evaluating the impact the
application of this guidance will have on the company’s financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.” This statement identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
in
the United States. This statement directs the hierarchy to the entity, rather
than the independent auditors, as the entity is responsible for selecting
accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. This statement is effective
60
days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board amendments to remove the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting
principles from the auditing standards. The company does not anticipate that
the
adoption of SFAS No. 162 will have a material impact on its financial
statements.
30
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are
based upon the company's consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the
company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related disclosures.
On an
ongoing basis, the company evaluates its estimates and judgments based on
historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Revenue
Recognition: The
company recognizes revenue on the sale of its products when risk of loss has
passed to the customer, which occurs at the time of shipment, and collectibility
is reasonably assured. The sale prices of the products sold are fixed and
determinable at the time of shipment. Sales are reported net of sales returns,
sales incentives and cash discounts based on prior experience and other
quantitative and qualitative factors.
At
the
Food Processing Equipment Group, the company enters into long-term sales
contracts for certain products. Revenue under these long-term sales contracts
is
recognized using the percentage of completion method prescribed by Statement
of
Position No. 81-1 due to the length of time to fully manufacture and assemble
the equipment. The company measures revenue recognized based on the ratio of
actual labor hours incurred in relation to the total estimated labor hours
to be
incurred related to the contract. Because estimated labor hours to complete
a
project are based upon forecasts using the best available information, the
actual hours may differ from original estimates. The percentage of completion
method of accounting for these contracts most accurately reflects the status
of
these uncompleted contracts in the company's financial statements and most
accurately measures the matching of revenues with expenses. At the time a loss
on a contract becomes known, the amount of the estimated loss is recognized
in
the consolidated financial statements.
Property
and equipment: Property
and equipment are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their
useful lives based on management's estimates of the period over which the assets
will be utilized to benefit the operations of the company. The useful lives
are
estimated based on historical experience with similar assets, taking into
account anticipated technological or other changes. The company
periodically reviews these lives relative to physical factors, economic factors
and industry trends. If there are changes in the planned use of property and
equipment or if technological changes were to occur more rapidly than
anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened,
resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense
in future periods.
31
Long-lived
assets: Long-lived
assets (including goodwill and other intangibles) are reviewed for impairment
annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the
recoverability of the company's long-lived assets, the company considers changes
in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash
flows and other factors. Estimates of future cash flows are judgments
based on the company's experience and knowledge of operations. These
estimates can be significantly impacted by many factors including changes in
global and local business and economic conditions, operating costs, inflation,
competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the company's
estimates or the underlying assumptions change in the future, the company may
be
required to record impairment charges.
Warranty: In
the
normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific
product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period
in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on
contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically
adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts
that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from
amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made
as
changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
Litigation: From
time
to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The
company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers
compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The
company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or
outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses.
A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these
contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance
coverage. The reserve requirements may change in the future due to new
developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy
in
dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or
results of operations.
Income
taxes: The
company operates in numerous foreign and domestic taxing jurisdictions where
it
is subject to various types of tax, including sales tax and income tax.
The company's tax filings are subject to audits and adjustments. Because of
the
nature of the company’s operations, the nature of the audit items can be
complex, and the objectives of the government auditors can result in a tax
on
the same transaction or income in more than one state or country. The
company initially recognizes the financial statement effects of a tax position
when it more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position
will be sustained upon examination. For tax positions that meet the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the company initially and
subsequently measures its tax positions as the largest amount of tax benefit
that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon effective
settlement with the taxing authority. As part of the company's calculation
of
the provision for taxes, the company has recorded liabilities on various tax
positions that are currently under audit by the taxing authorities. The
liabilities may change in the future upon effective settlement of the tax
positions.
32
Contractual
Obligations
The
company's contractual cash payment obligations as of September 27, 2008 are
set
forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|||||
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idle
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|||||
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
Long-term
|
|
Operating
|
|
Facility
|
|
Cash
|
|
|||||
|
|
Costs
|
|
Debt
|
|
Leases
|
|
Leases
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|||||
Less
than 1 year
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
7,803
|
$
|
2,429
|
$
|
358
|
$
|
10,590
|
||||||
1-3
years
|
4,935
|
440
|
2,588
|
848
|
8,811
|
|||||||||||
3-5
years
|
—
|
249,410
|
507
|
892
|
250,809
|
|||||||||||
After
5 years
|
—
|
—
|
32
|
819
|
851
|
|||||||||||
$
|
4,935
|
$
|
257,653
|
$
|
5,556
|
$
|
2,917
|
$
|
271,061
|
The
company has an obligation to make $4.9 million of purchase price payments to
the
sellers of Giga Grandi Cucine that were deferred in conjunction with the
acquisition.
The
company has contractual obligations under its various debt agreements to make
interest payments. These amounts are subject to the level of borrowings in
future periods and the interest rate for the applicable periods, and therefore
the amounts of these payments is not determinable.
The
company has $5.6 million in outstanding letters of credit, which expire on
September 27, 2009 to secure potential obligations under insurance
programs.
Idle
facility leases consists of an obligation for a manufacturing location that
was
exited in conjunction with the company's manufacturing consolidation efforts.
This lease obligation continues through June 2015. This facility has been
subleased. The obligation presented above does not reflect any anticipated
sublease income from the facilities.
Under
terms of the TurboChef merger agreement, upon closing of the transaction, the
company has an obligation to pay the stockholders of TurboChef a combination
of
$3.67 in cash and 0.0486 shares of Middleby common stock per TurboChef share.
The implied value per TurboChef share is $6.47 based on the closing price of
Middleby’s common stock as of August 11, 2008. The transaction is subject to a
number of closing conditions.
The
projected benefit obligation of the company’s defined benefit plans exceeded the
plans’ assets by $4.6 million at the end of 2007 as compared to $3.5 million at
the end of 2006. The unfunded benefit obligations were comprised of a $0.6
million under funding of the company's union plan and $4.0 million of under
funding of the company's director plans. The company does not expect to
contribute to the director plans in 2008. The company made minimum contributions
required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) of
$0.1 million in 2007 to the company's union plan. The company does not expect
to
make contributions in 2008 to the union plan.
The
company places purchase orders with its suppliers in the ordinary course of
business. These purchase orders are generally to fulfill short-term
manufacturing requirements of less than 90 days and most are cancelable with
a
restocking penalty. The company has no long-term purchase contracts or minimum
purchase obligations with any supplier.
The
company has no activities, obligations or exposures
associated with off-balance sheet arrangements.
33
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
The
company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. The
following table summarizes the maturity of the company’s debt
obligations.
Fixed
|
Variable
|
||||||
Rate
|
Rate
|
||||||
Twelve
Month Period Ending
|
Debt
|
Debt
|
|||||
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||
September
27, 2009
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
7,803
|
|||
September
27, 2010
|
—
|
220
|
|||||
September
27, 2011
|
—
|
220
|
|||||
September
27, 2012
|
—
|
220
|
|||||
September
27, 2013
|
—
|
249,190
|
|||||
|
$ | — |
$
|
257,653
|
During
the third quarter of 2008 the company amended its senior secured credit
facility. The
original agreement provided for $450.0 million of availability under a revolving
credit line. The amendment currently provides for $497.5 million of availability
under a revolving credit line. As
of
September 27, 2008, the company had $247.8 million of borrowings outstanding
under this facility. The company also has $5.6 million in outstanding letters
of
credit, which reduces the borrowing availability under the revolving credit
line.
Borrowings
under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate at
1.25% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate
and the Federal Funds Rate. At September 27, 2008 the average interest rate
on
the senior debt amounted to 3.87%. The interest rates on borrowings under the
senior bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based on the company’s defined
indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis. Additionally, a commitment
fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged on the unused portion of
the
revolving credit line. This variable commitment fee amounted to 0.25% as of
September 27, 2008.
In
August
2006, the company completed its acquisition of Houno A/S in Denmark. This
acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt facilities with
borrowings in Danish Krone. On September 27, 2008 these facilities
amounted to $4.7 million in US dollars, including $2.5 million outstanding
under
a revolving credit facility and $2.2 million of a term loan. The interest
rate on the revolving credit facility is assessed at 1.25% above Euro LIBOR,
which amounted to 6.5% on September 27, 2008. The term loan matures in 2013
and
the interest rate is assessed at 6.4%.
In
April
2008, the company completed its acquisition of Giga Grandi Cucine S.r.l in
Italy. This acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt
facilities with borrowings in denominated in Euro. On September 27, 2008
these facilities amounted to $5.2 million in US dollars. The borrowings
under these facilities are collateralized by the receivables of the
company. The interest rate on the credit facilities is tied to six-month
Euro LIBOR. The facilities mature in April of 2015.
The
company believes that its current capital resources, including cash and cash
equivalents, cash generated from operations, funds available from its revolving
credit facility and access to the credit and capital markets will be sufficient
to finance its operations, debt service obligations, capital expenditures,
product development and integration expenditures for the foreseeable
future.
34
The
company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. The agreements swap
one-month LIBOR for fixed rates. As of September 27, 2008 the company had the
following interest rate swaps in effect:
Fixed
|
|||||||||||
Notional
|
Interest
|
Effective
|
Maturity
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Date
|
||||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
5.030
|
%
|
3/3/2006
|
12/21/2009
|
||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
2.520
|
%
|
2/19/2008
|
2/19/2009
|
||||||
$ |
20,000,000
|
2.635
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2009
|
||||||
$ |
25,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
1/14/2008
|
1/14/2010
|
||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
2.920
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2010
|
||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
2.785
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/8/2010
|
||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
3.033
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/7/2011
|
||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
2.820
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2009
|
||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
3.590
|
%
|
6/10/2008
|
6/10/2011
|
||||||
$ |
20,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
6/10/2008
|
6/10/2010
|
||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
3.460
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/6/2011
|
||||||
$ |
15,000,000
|
3.130
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/7/2010
|
||||||
$ |
20,000,000
|
2.800
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/8/2009
|
||||||
$ |
25,000,000
|
3.670
|
%
|
9/26/2008
|
9/23/2011
|
The
terms
of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital
expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, ratios of indebtedness
of 3.5 debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(“EBITDA”) and fixed charge coverage of 1.25 EBITDA to fixed charges. The credit
agreement also provides that if a material adverse change in the company’s
business operations or conditions occurs, the lender could declare an event
of
default. Under terms of the agreement a material adverse effect is defined
as
(a) a material adverse change in, or a material adverse effect upon, the
operations, business properties, condition (financial and otherwise) or
prospects of the company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material
impairment of the ability of the company to perform under the loan agreements
and to avoid any event of default; or (c) a material adverse effect upon the
legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability against the company of
any
loan document. A material adverse effect is determined on a subjective basis
by
the company's creditors. The credit facility is secured by the capital stock
of
the company’s domestic subsidiaries, 65% of the capital stock of the company’s
foreign subsidiaries and substantially all other assets of the company. At
September 27, 2008, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant
to
its borrowing agreements.
35
Financing
Derivative Instruments
The
company has entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate applicable
to certain of its variable-rate debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for
a
fixed rates The company has designated these swaps as cash flow hedges and
all
changes in fair value of the swaps are recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income. As of September 27, 2008, the fair value of these
instruments was less than $0.1 million. The change in fair value of these swap
agreements in the first nine months of 2008 was a gain of $0.8 million, net
of
taxes.
A
summary
of the company’s interest rate swaps is as follows:
Fixed
|
Changes
|
||||||||||||||||
Notional
|
Interest
|
Effective
|
Maturity
|
Fair Value
|
In Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
Amount
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Date
|
Sep. 27, 2008
|
(net of taxes)
|
||||||||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
5.030
|
%
|
3/03/2006
|
12/21/2009
|
$
|
(234,000
|
)
|
$
|
137,000
|
1 | ||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
2.520
|
%
|
2/19/2008
|
2/19/2009
|
$
|
32,000
|
$
|
36,000
|
||||||||
$ |
20,000,000
|
2.635
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2009
|
$
|
49,000
|
$
|
69,000
|
||||||||
$ |
25,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
1/14/2008
|
1/14/2010
|
$
|
(91,000
|
)
|
$
|
224,000
|
|||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
2.920
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2010
|
$
|
30,000
|
$
|
82,000
|
||||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
2.785
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/8/2010
|
$
|
22,000
|
$
|
42,000
|
||||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
3.033
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/7/2011
|
$
|
49,000
|
$
|
78,000
|
||||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
2.820
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2009
|
$
|
92,000
|
$
|
115,000
|
||||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
3.590
|
%
|
6/10/2008
|
6/10/2011
|
$
|
(8,000
|
)
|
$
|
16,000
|
|||||||
$ |
20,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
6/10/2008
|
6/10/2010
|
$
|
(39,000
|
)
|
$
|
(28,000
|
)
|
||||||
$ |
10,000,000
|
3.460
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/6/2011
|
$
|
41,000
|
$
|
24,000
|
||||||||
$ |
15,000,000
|
3.130
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/7/2010
|
$
|
42,000
|
$
|
25,000
|
||||||||
$ |
20,000,000
|
2.800
|
%
|
9/8/2008
|
9/8/2009
|
$
|
52,000
|
$
|
31,000
|
||||||||
$ |
20,000,000
|
3.670
|
%
|
9/26/2008
|
9/23/2011
|
$
|
(49,000
|
)
|
$
|
(30,000
|
)
|
1 |
Previous
to the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2008, this swap had not been
designated as an effective cash flow hedge. The swap was designated
as an
effective cash flow hedge during the quarter ended March 29, 2008.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 133, the net reduction of $0.2 million in
the
fair value of this swap prior to the designation date has been recorded
as
a loss in earnings for the first quarter
2008.
|
Foreign
Exchange Derivative Financial Instruments
The
company uses foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts with terms
of
less than one year to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. The company’s primary hedging activities are to mitigate its exposure to
changes in exchange rates on intercompany and third party trade receivables
and
payables. The company does not currently enter into derivative financial
instruments for speculative purposes. In managing its foreign currency
exposures, the company identifies and aggregates naturally occurring offsetting
positions and then hedges residual balance sheet exposures. There were no
forward contracts outstanding at the end of the quarter.
36
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
The
company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the company's Exchange Act reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to the company's management, including its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
As
of
September 27, 2008, the company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision
and with the participation of the company's management, including the company's
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the
design and operation of the company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on the foregoing, the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the company's
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of this
period.
During
the quarter ended September 27, 2008, there has been no change in the company's
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or
is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting.
37
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
The
company was not required to report the information pursuant to Items 1 through
6
of Part II of Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 27, 2008, except
as
follows:
Item
1A. Risk Factors
Risks
Related to the company’s acquisition of TurboChef
Although
TurboChef and Middleby expect that the merger will result in benefits to the
combined company, the combined company may not realize those benefits because
of
various factors.
TurboChef
and Middleby believe that the merger will result in the diversification of
revenue streams and the expansion of marketing opportunities and efficiencies
for the combined company. Realizing the benefits anticipated from the merger
will depend, in part, on several factors, including:
·
|
retaining
and attracting key employees;
|
·
|
successfully
implementing cross-promotional and other future marketing initiatives,
products and services directed at Middleby's customer base;
and
|
·
|
improving
the overall performance of the TurboChef business.
|
Middleby
and TurboChef have operated and, until the completion of the merger, will
continue to operate independently. It is possible that the integration process
could result in the loss of key employees, as well as the disruption of each
company’s ongoing business. Any or all of those occurrences could adversely
affect Middleby’s ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees
after the merger or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.
Integration efforts between the two companies will also divert management
attention and resources. These integration matters could have an adverse effect
on each of Middleby and TurboChef.
38
TurboChef
and Middleby will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual
restrictions while the merger is pending.
Uncertainty
about the merger and diversion of management attention could harm TurboChef,
Middleby or the combined company, whether or not the merger is completed. In
response to the announcement of the merger, existing or prospective customers,
suppliers, distributors and retailers of TurboChef or Middleby may delay or
defer their purchasing or other decisions concerning TurboChef or Middleby,
or
they may seek to change their existing business relationship. In addition,
as a
result of the merger, current and prospective employees could experience
uncertainty about their future with TurboChef or Middleby or the combined
company. The success of the merger will depend in part on the retention of
personnel critical to the business and operation of the combined company and
the
uncertainties discussed above may impair each company's ability to retain,
recruit or motivate key personnel. The closing of the merger will also require
a
significant amount of time and attention from management. In addition, the
pendency of the merger could exacerbate the diversion of management resources
from other transactions or activities that TurboChef or Middleby may undertake.
The diversion of management attention away from ongoing operations could
adversely affect ongoing operations and business relationships. The merger
agreement also restricts TurboChef from making certain acquisitions and taking
other specified actions until the merger occurs. These restrictions may prevent
TurboChef from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior
to the closing of the merger.
The
issuance of shares of Middleby common stock to TurboChef stockholders in the
merger will initially have a negative impact on the earnings per share of the
combined company.
If
the
merger is completed, TurboChef and Middleby expect that up to approximately
1.525 million shares of Middleby common stock will be issued to TurboChef
stockholders (based on the number of outstanding shares of TurboChef common
stock on August 12, 2008, and issuable pursuant to the exercise of all
outstanding options, settlement of restricted stock units, and cancellation
of
exchange rights to purchase shares of TurboChef common stock on August 12,
2008). The companies expect that the merger will initially result in lower
earnings per share than would have been earned by Middleby in the absence of
the
merger. Based on the expected number of shares of Middleby common stock to
be
issued to TurboChef stockholders in the merger, TurboChef stockholders will
own
approximately 8% of the then outstanding shares of Middleby common stock on
a
fully diluted basis (including options) immediately after the merger. Middleby
expects that over time the merger will yield benefits to the combined company
such that the merger will ultimately be accretive to earnings per share on
a
generally accepted accounting principles (“ GAAP ”) basis. However, there can be
no assurance that the increase in earnings per share on a GAAP basis expected
over time will be achieved or that stockholders of either company will realize
a
benefit from the merger commensurate with the ownership dilution they will
experience in connection with the merger. In order to achieve increases in
earnings per share on a GAAP basis as a result of the merger, the combined
company will, among other things, need to effectively continue the successful
operations of TurboChef and Middleby after the merger, develop successful
marketing initiatives, products and services and improve the overall performance
of the TurboChef business.
39
The
company’s substantial leverage following the TurboChef merger could adversely
affect its ability to raise additional capital to fund operations, limit
its
ability to react to changes in the economy or the company’s industry and prevent
the company from satisfying its debt obligations.
Following
the TurboChef merger, the combined company will have a substantial amount
of
indebtedness. As of September 30, 2008, Middleby had $257.7 million outstanding
indebtedness for borrowed money. In addition, Middleby expects to incur
incremental borrowings under its existing revolving credit facility in order
to
finance the cash portion of the merger consideration. After giving effect
to the
merger, the pro forma indebtedness of the combined company as of September
30,
2008 is estimated to be approximately $390.0 million. This substantial
indebtedness could have important consequences on the combined company’s
business and financial condition. For example:
·
|
if
Middleby fails to meet payment obligations or otherwise defaults
under the
agreements governing its indebtedness, the lenders under those
agreements
will have the right to accelerate the indebtedness and exercise
other
rights and remedies against the combined company;
|
·
|
Middleby
will be required to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash
flow from
operations to payments on its debt, thereby reducing funds available
for
working capital, capital expenditures, dividends, acquisitions
and other
purposes;
|
·
|
Middleby’s
ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital,
capital expenditures, additional acquisitions and other general
corporate
requirements could be limited;
|
·
|
Middleby
will experience increased vulnerability to, and limited flexibility
in
planning for, changes to its business and adverse economic and
industry
conditions;
|
·
|
Middleby’s
credit rating could be adversely affected;
|
·
|
Middleby
could be placed at a competitive disadvantage relative to other
companies
with less indebtedness; and
|
·
|
Middleby’s
ability to apply excess cash flows of Middleby or proceeds from
certain
types of securities offerings, asset sales and other transactions
to
purposes other than the repayment of debt could be limited.
|
Under
the
terms of the company’s credit facilities, the company will be permitted to incur
additional indebtedness subject to certain conditions, and the risks described
above may be increased if the company incurs additional
indebtedness.
Risks
Related to Current Market Events
Economic
conditions may cause a decline in business and consumer spending which could
adversely affect the comapny's business and financial
performance.
The
company's operating results are impacted by the health of the North
American, European, Asian and Latin American economies. The
company's business and financial performance, including collection
of its accounts receivable, may be adversely affected by the current and
future economic conditions that cause a decline in business and consumer
spending, including a reduction in the availability of credit, decreased growth
by its existing customers, customers electing to delay the replacement of
aging equipment, higher energy costs, rising interest rates, financial market
volatility, recession and acts of terrorism. Additionally, the
company may experience difficulties in scaling its operations to economic
pressures in the U.S. and International markets.
40
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
|
Average
Price Paid
per Share
|
|
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plan or
Program
|
|
Maximum
Number of
Shares that May
Yet be
Purchased
Under the Plan
or Program
|
|
||||
June 29, 2008 to July
25, 2008
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
632,132
|
|||||||||
July
26, 2008 to August 26, 2008
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
632,132
|
|||||||||
August
27, 2008 to September 27, 2008
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
632,132
|
|||||||||
Quarter
ended September 27, 2008
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
632,132
|
In
July
1998, the company's Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program that
authorized the purchase of common shares in open market purchases. As of
September 27, 2008, 1,167,868 shares had been purchased under the 1998 stock
repurchase program.
41
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibits
|
–
|
The
following exhibits are filed herewith:
|
Exhibit
31.1
|
–
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
||
Exhibit
31.2
|
–
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Exhibit
32.1
|
–
|
Certification
by the Principal Executive Officer of The Middleby Corporation
Pursuant to
Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350).
|
Exhibit
32.2
|
–
|
Certification
by the Principal Financial Officer of The Middleby Corporation
Pursuant to
Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C.
1350).
|
42
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION
|
(Registrant)
|
November 6, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/ Timothy J. FitzGerald
|
||
Timothy
J. FitzGerald
|
||||
Vice
President,
|
||||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
43