MIDDLEBY Corp - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the quarterly period ended March 29, 2008
or
o Transition
Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Commission
File No. 1-9973
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware
|
36-3352497
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
1400
Toastmaster Drive, Elgin, Illinois
|
60120
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
Telephone No., including Area Code (847)
741-3300
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and
smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer x Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o Smaller
reporting company o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
As
of May
2, 2008, there were 16,960,896 shares of the registrant's common stock
outstanding.
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 29, 2008
INDEX
DESCRIPTION
|
PAGE
|
||
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
||
March
29, 2008 and December 29, 2007
|
1
|
||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS
|
|||
March
29, 2008 and March 31, 2007
|
2 | ||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS
|
|||
March
29, 2008 and March 31, 2007
|
3 | ||
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
|
|||
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
4
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
||
and
Results of Operations
|
21
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
29
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
32
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
33
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
33
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
33
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts
In Thousands, Except Share Data)
(Unaudited)
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Dec. 29, 2007
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
5,518
|
$
|
7,463
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of $6,443 and
$5,818
|
83,928
|
73,090
|
|||||
Inventories,
net
|
81,513
|
66,438
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
12,571
|
10,341
|
|||||
Prepaid
taxes
|
16,159
|
17,986
|
|||||
Current
deferred taxes
|
15,630
|
16,643
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
215,319
|
191,961
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $42,339 and
$41,114
|
45,883
|
36,774
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
211,612
|
109,814
|
|||||
Other
intangibles
|
125,686
|
52,522
|
|||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
5,800
|
16,929
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
2,526
|
3,079
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
606,826
|
$
|
411,079
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
$
|
2,661
|
$
|
2,683
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
36,904
|
26,576
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
84,607
|
95,581
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
124,172
|
124,840
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
269,996
|
93,514
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
15,472
|
9,813
|
|||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; nonvoting; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Common
stock, $0.005 par value; 47,500,000 shares authorized; 20,817,536
and
20,732,836 shares issued in 2008 and 2007, respectively
|
120
|
120
|
|||||
Paid-in
capital
|
105,947
|
104,782
|
|||||
Treasury
stock at cost; 3,859,913 and 3,855,044 shares in 2008 and 2007,
respectively
|
(90,014
|
)
|
(89,641
|
)
|
|||
Retained
earnings
|
180,077
|
166,896
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
1,056
|
755
|
|||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
197,186
|
182,912
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
606,826
|
$
|
411,079
|
See
accompanying notes
1
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Mar. 31, 2007
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
160,883
|
$
|
105,695
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
101,981
|
64,590
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
58,902
|
41,105
|
|||||
Selling
and distribution expenses
|
16,245
|
11,116
|
|||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
16,641
|
11,183
|
|||||
Income
from operations
|
26,016
|
18,806
|
|||||
Interest
expense and deferred financing amortization, net
|
3,703
|
1,244
|
|||||
Other
expense (income), net
|
387
|
(107
|
)
|
||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
21,926
|
17,669
|
|||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
8,745
|
6,949
|
|||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
13,181
|
$
|
10,720
|
|||
Net
earnings per share:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.82
|
$
|
0.69
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.77
|
$
|
0.64
|
|||
Weighted
average number of shares
|
|||||||
Basic
|
16,055
|
15,510
|
|||||
Dilutive
stock options1
|
1,115
|
1,230
|
|||||
Diluted
|
17,170
|
16,740
|
1
There
were no anti-dilutive stock options excluded from common stock equivalents
for
any period presented.
See
accompanying notes
2
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
Thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Mar. 31, 2007
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities-
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
13,181
|
$
|
10,720
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,533
|
1,318
|
|||||
Deferred
taxes
|
2,512
|
25
|
|||||
Non-cash
share-based compensation
|
2,350
|
1,322
|
|||||
Unrealized
loss on derivative financial instruments
|
204
|
—
|
|||||
Cash
effects of changes in -
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
815
|
(2,121
|
)
|
||||
Inventories,
net
|
(1,558
|
)
|
(4,823
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
3,767
|
(697
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
5,461
|
907
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
(17,702
|
)
|
(11,086
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
12,563
|
(4,435
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities-
|
|||||||
Net
additions to property and equipment
|
(2,124
|
)
|
(598
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of Star
|
(188,068
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(190,192
|
)
|
(598
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities-
|
|||||||
Net
proceeds
(repayments) under revolving credit facilities
|
176,350
|
9,450
|
|||||
Repayments
under senior secured bank notes
|
—
|
(3,750
|
)
|
||||
Repayments
under foreign bank loan
|
(245
|
)
|
(1,077
|
)
|
|||
Debt
issuance costs
|
(162
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(373
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Net
proceeds from stock issuances
|
37
|
925
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
175,607
|
5,548
|
|||||
Effect
of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
77
|
4
|
|||||
Changes
in cash and cash equivalents-
|
|||||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,945
|
)
|
519
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
7,463
|
3,534
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of quarter
|
$
|
5,518
|
$
|
4,053
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
2,359
|
$
|
1,038
|
|||
Income
tax payments
|
$
|
245
|
$
|
4,411
|
See
accompanying notes
3
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
29, 2008
(Unaudited)
1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
A) Basis
of Presentation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by The Middleby
Corporation (the "company"), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements are unaudited
and
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
such
rules and regulations, although the company believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information not misleading. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes
contained in the company's 2007 Form 10-K.
In
the
opinion of management, the financial statements contain all adjustments
necessary to present fairly the financial position of the company as of March
29, 2008 and December 29, 2007, and the results of operations for the three
months ended March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007 and cash flows for the three
months ended March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007.
B) Share-Based
Compensation
Share-based
compensation expense is calculated by estimating the fair value of market based
stock awards and stock options at the time of grant and amortized over the
stock
options’ vesting period. Share-based compensation expense was $2.4 million and
$1.3 million for the first quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively.
4
C) Income
Tax Contingencies
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (“FASB”) issued Interpretation
No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). This
interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should
recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain
tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.
FIN
48 states that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized
only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable, based on
its technical merits. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest
amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon
settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant
information. A tax benefit from an uncertain position was previously recognized
if it was probable of being sustained. Under FIN 48, the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits is classified as non-current unless the liability
is
expected to be settled in cash within 12 months of the reporting date. FIN
48 is
effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after December
15, 2006. The company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on the first day of
fiscal 2007 as required.
As
of
December 29, 2007, the total amount of liability for unrecognized tax benefits
related to federal, state and foreign taxes was approximately $7.7 million
plus
approximately $1.0 million of accrued interest and $1.3 million of penalties.
As
of March 29, 2008, the corresponding balance of liability for unrecognized
tax
benefits was approximately $8.0 million plus approximately $1.0 million of
accrued interest and $1.3 million of penalties. The company recognizes interest
and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax
expense, which is consistent with reporting in prior periods.
The
company does not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will
significantly change due to any settlement of audits and the expiration of
statute of limitations within the next twelve months.
The
company operates in multiple taxing jurisdictions; both within the United States
and outside of the United States, and faces audits from various tax authorities.
The Company remains subject to examination until the statute of limitations
expires for the respective tax jurisdiction. Within specific countries, the
company and its operating subsidiaries may be subject to audit by various tax
authorities and may be subject to different statute of limitations expiration
dates. A summary of the tax years that remain subject to examination in the
company’s major tax jurisdictions are:
United
States – federal
|
2005
- 2007
|
|||
United
States – states
|
2001
- 2007
|
|||
China
|
2006
- 2007
|
|||
Denmark
|
2006
- 2007
|
|||
Mexico
|
2006
- 2007
|
|||
Philippines
|
2004
- 2007
|
|||
South
Korea
|
2004
- 2007
|
|||
Spain
|
2005
- 2007
|
|||
Taiwan
|
2005
- 2007
|
|||
United
Kingdom
|
2006
- 2007
|
5
D) Fair
Value Measures
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”. This statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in general accepted accounting
principles and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. This statement
is effective for interim reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The company adopted SFAS No. 157 on December 30, 2007 (first
day of fiscal year 2008). The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material
impact on the financial statements.
FASB
Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date
of FASB
Statement No. 157”
delays
the effective
date of the application of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
non-recurring basis. The company adopted SFAS No. 157 with the exception of
the
application of the statement to non-recurring nonfinancial assets and
liabilities. Non-recurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
for
which the company has not applied the provisions of SFAS No. 157 primarily
include those measured at fair value in goodwill and long-lived asset impairment
testing, those initially measured at fair value in a business combination,
and
nonfinancial liabilities for exit or disposal activities.
SFAS
No.
157 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or
paid
to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal most advantageous
market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into the
following levels:
Level
1 –
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level
2 –
Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either
directly or indirectly.
Level
3 –
Unobservable inputs based on assumptions.
The
company’s financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis
are categorized using the fair value hierarchy and liabilities at March 29,
2008
are as follows (in thousands):
Fair
Value
|
Fair
Value
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Financial
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||
None
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Financial
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
—
|
$ |
1,353
|
—
|
$ |
1,353
|
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement
is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption
of
SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on the financial statements. Upon
adoption, the company has not elected to apply SFAS No. 159 to measure selected
financial instruments and certain other items; therefore, there was no impact
to
the financial statements upon adoption. Subsequent to the initial adoption
of
SFAS No. 159, the company has not made any elections during the three months
ended March 29, 2008.
6
2) |
Acquisitions
and Purchase Accounting
|
Jade
On
April
1, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Jade Products Company (“Jade”), a leading manufacturer of commercial and
residential cooking equipment from Maytag Corporation ("Maytag") for an
aggregate purchase price of $7.4 million in cash plus transaction expenses.
The
purchase price is subject to adjustment based upon a working capital provision
within the purchase agreement.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities
acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Jade acquisition is summarized
as follows (in thousands):
Apr. 1, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Mar. 29, 2008
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
6,727
|
$
|
217
|
$
|
6,944
|
||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
2,029
|
(172
|
)
|
1,857
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
250
|
(250
|
)
|
—
|
||||||
Other
intangibles
|
1,590
|
(135
|
)
|
1,455
|
||||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
—
|
841
|
841
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,205
|
)
|
(113
|
)
|
(3,318
|
)
|
||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
7,391
|
$
|
388
|
$
|
7,779
|
Other
intangibles of $1.3 million associated with the trade name, are subject to
the
non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets”, from the date of acquisition. Other intangibles of $0.2 million
allocated to customer relationships are to be amortized over a periods of 10
years. Goodwill and other intangibles of Jade are allocated to the Commercial
Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are
expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Carter-Hoffmann
On
June
29, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Carter-Hoffmann (“Carter-Hoffmann”), a leading manufacturer of commercial
cooking and warming equipment, from Carrier Commercial Refrigeration
Inc.,
a
subsidiary of Carrier Corporation, which is a unit of United Technologies
Corporation, for
an
aggregate purchase price of $15.9 million in cash plus transaction expenses.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
7
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Carter-Hoffmann acquisition is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
Jun.
29, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Mar.
29, 2008
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
7,912
|
$
|
(795
|
)
|
$
|
7,117
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
2,264
|
—
|
2,264
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
9,452
|
(6,950
|
)
|
2,502
|
||||||
Other
intangibles
|
—
|
3,910
|
3,910
|
|||||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
—
|
4,199
|
4,199
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(3,646
|
)
|
(50
|
)
|
(3,696
|
)
|
||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(54
|
)
|
—
|
(54
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
15,928
|
$
|
314
|
$
|
16,242
|
The
goodwill and $2.3 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name
are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other
intangibles also includes $1.6 million allocated to customer relationships
are
to be amortized over a period of 4 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of
Carter-Hoffmann are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group
for
segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for
tax
purposes.
MP
Equipment
On
July
2, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
MP Equipment (“MP Equipment”), a leading manufacturer of food processing
equipment for a purchase price of $15.0 million in cash plus transaction
expenses. An additional deferred payment of $2.0 million is also due to the
seller at the earlier of three years or upon the achievement of reaching certain
profit targets. An additional contingent payment of $1.0 million is also payable
if the business reaches certain target profits.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the MP Equipment acquisition is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
Jul. 2, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Mar. 29, 2008
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
5,315
|
$
|
114
|
$
|
5,429
|
||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
297
|
—
|
297
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
9,290
|
(4,682
|
)
|
4,608
|
||||||
Other
intangibles
|
6,420
|
(770
|
)
|
5,650
|
||||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
—
|
5,414
|
5,414
|
|||||||
Other
assets
|
16
|
—
|
16
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(4,018
|
)
|
—
|
(4,018
|
)
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(2,127
|
)
|
—
|
(2,127
|
)
|
|||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
15,193
|
$
|
76
|
$
|
15,269
|
8
The
goodwill and $3.3 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name
are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other
intangibles also includes $0.3 million allocated to backlog, $0.3 million
allocated to developed technology and $1.8 million allocated to customer
relationships which are to be amortized over periods of 6 months, 5 years and
5
years, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of MP Equipment are
allocated to the Food Processing Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes.
These assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Wells
Bloomfield
On
August
3, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations
of
Wells Bloomfield (“Wells Bloomfield”), a leading manufacturer of commercial
cooking and beverage equipment from Carrier Commercial Refrigeration
Inc.,
a
subsidiary of Carrier Corporation, which is a unit of United Technologies
Corporation, for
an
aggregate purchase price of $28.4 million in cash plus transaction expenses.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Wells Bloomfield acquisition is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
Aug. 3, 2007
|
Adjustments
|
Mar. 29, 2008
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2
|
||||
Current
assets
|
15,133
|
1,226
|
16,359
|
|||||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
3,961
|
(5
|
)
|
3,956
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
5,835
|
(4,965
|
)
|
870
|
||||||
Other
intangibles
|
8,130
|
(200
|
)
|
7,930
|
||||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
—
|
5,579
|
5,579
|
|||||||
Other
assets
|
21
|
—
|
21
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
(4,277
|
)
|
(1,534
|
)
|
(5,811
|
)
|
||||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
28,805
|
$
|
101
|
$
|
28,906
|
The
goodwill and $5.5 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name
are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other
intangibles of $2.4 million allocated to customer relationships are to be
amortized over a period of 4 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of Wells
Bloomfield are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for
segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for
tax
purposes.
9
Star
On
December 31, 2007, subsequent to the company’s fiscal 2007 year end, the company
acquired the stock of New Star International Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
(“Star”), a leading manufacturer of commercial cooking for an aggregate purchase
price of $188.4 million in cash plus transaction expenses. The purchase price
is
subject to adjustment based upon a working capital provision within the purchase
agreement.
The
company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method
to
record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial
statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities
and
intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon
finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The
preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Star acquisition is summarized
as
follows (in thousands):
Mar. 29, 2008
|
||||
Cash
|
$
|
376
|
||
Current
assets
|
27,783
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
8,225
|
|||
Goodwill
|
101,365
|
|||
Other
intangibles
|
75,150
|
|||
Other
assets
|
71
|
|||
Current
liabilities
|
(11,394
|
)
|
||
Deferred
tax liability
|
(8,837
|
)
|
||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
(4.295
|
)
|
||
Total
cash paid
|
$
|
188,444
|
The
goodwill and $47.0 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name
are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other
intangibles also includes $0.4 million allocated to backlog, $3.8 million
allocated to developed technology and $24.0 million allocated to customer
relationships which are to be amortized over periods of 1 month, 7 years and
7
years, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Star are allocated to
the
Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These
assets are not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
3)
|
Stock
Split
|
On
May 3,
2007, the company’s Board of Directors authorized a two-for-one split of the
company’s common stock in the form of a stock dividend. The stock dividend was
paid on June 15, 2007 to company shareholders of record as of June 1, 2007.
The
company’s common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on June 18, 2007.
All references in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto to net earnings per share and the number of shares have been
adjusted to reflect this stock split.
10
4)
|
Litigation
Matters
|
From
time
to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The
company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers
compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The
company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or
outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses.
A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these
contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance
coverage. The reserve requirement may change in the future due to new
developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy
in
dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows of the company.
5)
|
Recently
Issued Accounting
Standards
|
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement
is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption
of
SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on the financial
statements.
In
December 2007, the FAS issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations”. This
statement provides companies with principles and requirements on how an acquirer
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree
as well as the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business
combination. This statement also requires certain disclosures to enable users
of
the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. Acquisition costs associated with the business combination
will generally be expensed as incurred. This statement is effective for business
combinations occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
Early adoption of FASB Statement No. 141R is not permitted. The company is
evaluating the impact the application of this guidance will have on the
company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
11
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Upon its adoption, effective as of the beginning of the company’s 2009 fiscal year, noncontrolling interests will be classified as equity in the company’s financial statements and income and comprehensive income attributed to the noncontrolling interest will be included in the company’s income and comprehensive income. The provisions of this standard must be applied retrospectively upon adoption. The company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have a material impact on its financial statements. The Company will adopt this statement for acquisitions consummated after the statements effective date.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This statement
amends SFAS No. 133 to require enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative
and hedging activities. This Statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early application encouraged. The company is evaluating the impact the
application of this guidance will have on the company’s financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
6) |
Other
Comprehensive Income
|
The
company reports changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from
investment by owners and distribution to owners, in accordance with SFAS No.
130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income."
Components
of other comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Mar. 31, 2007
|
||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
13,181
|
$
|
10,720
|
|||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
845
|
32
|
|||||
Unrealized
loss on
|
|||||||
interest
rate swaps, net of tax
|
(544
|
)
|
(136
|
)
|
|||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
13,482
|
$
|
10,616
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income is comprised of minimum pension liability of $(0.9)
million, net of taxes of $(0.6) million, as of March 29, 2008 and December
29,
2007, foreign currency translation adjustments of $2.5 million as of March
29,
2008 and $1.7 million as of December 29, 2007, and an unrealized loss on
interest rate swaps of $0.5 million, net of taxes of $0.4 million, as of March
29, 2008.
12
7)
|
Inventories
|
Inventories
are composed of material, labor and overhead and are stated at the lower of
cost
or market. Costs for inventory at two of the company's manufacturing facilities
have been determined using the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. These
inventories under the LIFO method amounted to $16.6 million at March 29, 2008
and $16.4 million at December 29, 2007 and represented approximately 20% and
25%
of the total inventory in each respective period. Costs for all other inventory
have been determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. The company
estimates reserves for inventory obsolescence and shrinkage based on its
judgment of future realization. Inventories at March 29, 2008 and December
29,
2007 are as follows:
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Dec. 29, 2007
|
||||||
(in thousands)
|
|||||||
Raw
materials and parts
|
$
|
24,882
|
$
|
25,047
|
|||
Work-in-process
|
20,426
|
11,033
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
36,616
|
30,669
|
|||||
81,924
|
66,749
|
||||||
LIFO
adjustment
|
(411
|
)
|
(311
|
)
|
|||
$
|
81,513
|
$
|
66,438
|
8) |
Accrued
Expenses
|
Accrued
expenses consist of the following:
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Dec, 29, 2007
|
||||||
(in thousands)
|
|||||||
Accrued
payroll and related expenses
|
$
|
13,707
|
$
|
21,448
|
|||
Accrued
warranty
|
13,326
|
12,276
|
|||||
Accrued
customer rebates
|
8,970
|
16,326
|
|||||
Advance
customer deposits
|
7,948
|
7,971
|
|||||
Accrued
product liability and workers comp
|
7,946
|
6,978
|
|||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
32,710
|
30,582
|
|||||
$
|
84,607
|
$
|
95,581
|
13
9) |
Warranty
Costs
|
In
the
normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific
product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period
in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on
contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically
adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts
that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from
amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made
as
changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
A
rollforward of the warranty reserve is as follows:
Three Months Ended
|
||||
Mar. 29, 2008
|
||||
(in thousands)
|
||||
Beginning
balance
|
$
|
12,276
|
||
Warranty
reserve related to acquisitions
|
1,030
|
|||
Warranty
expense
|
3,625
|
|||
Warranty
claims
|
(3,605
|
)
|
||
Ending
balance
|
$
|
13,326
|
10) |
Financing
Arrangements
|
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Dec. 29, 2007
|
||||||
(in thousands)
|
|||||||
Senior
secured revolving credit line
|
$
|
267,700
|
$
|
91,350
|
|||
Foreign
loan
|
4,957
|
4,847
|
|||||
Total
debt
|
$
|
272,657
|
$
|
96,197
|
|||
Less:
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
2,661
|
2,683
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
$
|
269,996
|
$
|
93,514
|
During
the fourth quarter of 2007 the company entered into a new senior secured credit
facility. Terms of the senior credit agreement provide for $450.0 million of
availability under a revolving credit line. As of March 29, 2008, the company
had $267.7 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The company
also has $4.1 million in outstanding letters of credit, which reduces the
borrowing availability under the revolving credit line.
Borrowings
under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate at
1.25% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate
and the Federal Funds Rate. At March 29, 2008 the average interest rate on
the
senior debt amounted to 4.21%. The interest rates on borrowings under the senior
bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based on the company’s defined
indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis. Additionally, a commitment
fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged on the unused portion of
the
revolving credit line. This variable commitment fee amounted to 0.25% as of
March 29, 2008.
14
In
August
2006, the company completed its acquisition of Houno A/S in Denmark. This
acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt facilities with
borrowings in Danish Krone. On March 29, 2008 these facilities amounted to
$5.0 million in US dollars, including $2.6 million outstanding under a revolving
credit facility and $2.4 million of a term loan. The interest rate on the
revolving credit facility is assessed at 1.25% above Euro LIBOR, which amounted
to 5.41% on March 29, 2008. The term loan matures in 2013 and the interest
rate
is assessed at 5.62%.
The
company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. The agreements swap
one-month LIBOR for fixed rates. As of March 29, 2008 the company had the
following interest rate swaps in effect:
Fixed
|
||||||||||
Notional
|
Interest
|
Effective
|
Maturity
|
|||||||
Amount
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Date
|
|||||||
$
10,000,000
|
5.030
|
%
|
03/03/06
|
12/21/09
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.520
|
%
|
2/13/2008
|
2/19/2009
|
||||||
$ 20,000,000
|
2.635
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2009
|
||||||
$ 25,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
1/14/2008
|
1/14/2010
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.920
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2010
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.785
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2010
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
3.033
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2011
|
||||||
$ 10,000,000
|
2.820
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2009
|
The
terms
of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital
expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, certain ratios of
indebtedness and fixed charge coverage. The credit agreement also provides
that
if a material adverse change in the company’s business operations or conditions
occurs, the lender could declare an event of default. Under terms of the
agreement a material adverse effect is defined as (a) a material adverse change
in, or a material adverse effect upon, the operations, business properties,
condition (financial and otherwise) or prospects of the company and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the ability of
the
company to perform under the loan agreements and to avoid any event of default;
or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect
or
enforceability against the company of any loan document. A material adverse
effect is determined on a subjective basis by the company's creditors. The
credit facility is secured by the capital stock of the company’s domestic
subsidiaries, 65% of the capital stock of the company’s foreign subsidiaries and
substantially all other assets of the company. At March 29, 2008, the company
was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its borrowing
agreements.
15
11) |
Financial
Instruments
|
In
June
1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and
Hedging Activities". SFAS No. 133, as amended, establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments. The statement requires an entity
to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure those
instruments at fair value. Derivatives that do not qualify as a hedge must
be
adjusted to fair value in earnings. If the derivative does qualify as a hedge
under SFAS No. 133, changes in the fair value will either be offset against
the
change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments
or
recognized in other accumulated comprehensive income until the hedged item
is
recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a hedge's change in fair
value will be immediately recognized in earnings.
Foreign
Exchange:
The
company has entered into derivative instruments, principally forward contracts
to reduce exposures pertaining to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. As
of
March 29, 2008 the company had no forward contracts outstanding.
The
company has entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate applicable
to certain of its variable-rate debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for
a
fixed rates. The company has designated these swaps as cash flow hedges and
all
changes in fair value of the swaps are recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income. As of March 29, 2008, the fair value of these instruments
was $1.4 million. The change in fair value of these swap agreements in the
first
three months of 2008 was a loss of $0.5 million, net of taxes.
Fixed
|
Changes
|
|||||||||||||||
Notional
|
Interest
|
Effective
|
Maturity
|
Fair Value
|
In Fair Value
|
|||||||||||
Amount
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Date
|
Mar. 29, 2008
|
(net of taxes)
|
|||||||||||
$
10,000,000
|
5.030
|
%
|
03/03/06
|
12/21/09
|
$ |
(462,000
|
)
|
$ |
(9,000
|
)1 | ||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.520
|
%
|
2/13/2008
|
2/19/2009
|
$ |
(28,000
|
)
|
$ |
(17,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
20,000,000
|
2.635
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2009
|
$ |
(65,000
|
)
|
$ |
(39,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
25,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
1/14/2008
|
1/14/2010
|
$ |
(464,000
|
)
|
$ |
(278,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.920
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2010
|
$ |
(106,000
|
)
|
$ |
(64,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.785
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2010
|
$ |
(47,000
|
)
|
$ |
(28,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
3.033
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2011
|
$ |
(81,000
|
)
|
$ |
(49,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.820
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2009
|
$ |
(100,000
|
)
|
$ |
(60,000
|
)
|
1 |
Previous
to the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2008, this swap had not been
designated as an effective cash flow hedge. The swap was designated
as an
effective cash flow hedge during the quarter ended March 29, 2008.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 133, the net reduction of $0.2 million in
the
fair value of this swap prior to the designation date has been recorded
as
a loss in earnings for the first quarter
2008.
|
16
12) |
Segment
Information
|
The
company operates in three reportable operating segments defined by management
reporting structure and operating activities.
The
Commercial Foodservice Equipment business group manufactures cooking equipment
for the restaurant and institutional kitchen industry. This business segment
has
manufacturing facilities in California, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada,
New Hampshire, North Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Denmark and the Philippines.
The
Commercial Foodservice Equipment group manufactures conveyor ovens, convection
ovens, fryers, ranges, toasters, combi ovens, steamers, broilers, deck ovens,
baking ovens, proofers, beverage systems and beverage dispensing equipment,
counter-top cooking and warming equipment. This business segment’s principal
product lines include Middleby Marshall® and CTX® conveyor oven equipment,
Blodgett® convection ovens, conveyor ovens, deck oven equipment, Blodgett Combi®
cooking equipment, Blodgett Range® ranges, Nu-Vu® baking ovens and proofers,
Pitco Frialator® fryer equipment, Southbend® ranges, convection ovens and
heavy-duty cooking equipment, Toastmaster® toasters and counterline cooking and
warming equipment, Jade Range® ranges and ovens, Carter Hoffmann® warming,
holding and transporting equipment, Bloomfield® beverage systems and beverage
dispensing equipment, Wells® convection
ovens, counterline cooking equipment and ventless cooking systems,
Star®
light duty cooking equipment, Holman® toasting equipment, Lang® ovens and
ranges, Houno® combi-ovens and baking ovens and MagiKitch'n® charbroilers and
catering equipment.
The
Food
Processing Equipment business group manufactures cooking and packaging equipment
for the food processing industry. This business segment has manufacturing
facilities in Georgia and Wisconsin. Its principal products include
Alkar®
batch
ovens, conveyorized ovens and continuous process ovens, RapidPak®
food
packaging machinery and MP Equipment®
breading, battering, mixing, forming, and slicing equipment.
The
International Distribution Division provides integrated sales, export
management, distribution and installation services through its operations in
China, India, Lebanon, Mexico, the Philippines, Russia, South Korea, Spain,
Sweden, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The division sells the company’s product
lines and certain non-competing complementary product lines throughout the
world. For a local country distributor or dealer, the company is able to provide
a centralized source of foodservice equipment with complete export management
and product support services.
The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. The chief decision maker evaluates
individual segment performance based on operating income. Management believes
that intersegment sales are made at established arms-length transfer
prices.
17
Net
Sales Summary
(dollars
in thousands)
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Mar. 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
||||||||||
Business
Divisions:
|
|||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice
|
$
|
134,016
|
83.3
|
$
|
90,539
|
85.7
|
|||||||
Food
Processing
|
19,888
|
12.4
|
12,196
|
11.5
|
|||||||||
International
Distribution(1)
|
15,793
|
9.8
|
13,576
|
12.8
|
|||||||||
Intercompany
sales (2)
|
(8,814
|
)
|
(5.5
|
)
|
(10,616
|
)
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
160,883
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
105,695
|
100.0
|
%
|
(1) |
Consists
of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products
manufactured
by third parties.
|
(2) |
Represents
the elimination of sales from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment
Group
to the International Distribution
Division.
|
The
following table summarizes the results of operations for the company's business
segments(1)(in
thousands):
Commercial
|
Food
|
International
|
Corporate
|
||||||||||||||||
Foodservice
|
Processing
|
Distribution
|
and
Other(2)
|
Eliminations(3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
Three
months ended March 29, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
134,016
|
$
|
19,888
|
$
|
15,793
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(8,814
|
)
|
$
|
160,883
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
30,547
|
2,789
|
1,074
|
(8,442
|
)
|
48
|
26,016
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
1,269
|
104
|
52
|
37
|
—
|
1,462
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
1,899
|
51
|
152
|
22
|
—
|
2,124
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
475,583
|
68,202
|
29,887
|
43,634
|
(10,480
|
)
|
606,826
|
||||||||||||
Long-lived
assets(4)
|
335,317
|
37,766
|
713
|
17,711
|
—
|
391,507
|
|||||||||||||
Three
months ended March 31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
90,539
|
$
|
12,196
|
$
|
13,576
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(10,616
|
)
|
$
|
105,695
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
21,788
|
2,400
|
846
|
(6,282
|
)
|
54
|
18,806
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
695
|
127
|
43
|
36
|
—
|
901
|
|||||||||||||
Net
capital expenditures
|
520
|
6
|
11
|
61
|
—
|
598
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
217,440
|
49,241
|
29,430
|
1,985
|
(6,523
|
)
|
291,573
|
||||||||||||
Long-lived
assets(4)
|
129,492
|
27,736
|
433
|
8,878
|
—
|
166,539
|
(1) |
Non-operating
expenses are not allocated to the operating segments. Non-operating
expenses consist of interest expense and
deferred financing amortization, foreign exchange gains and losses
and
other income and expense items outside of income
from operations.
|
(2) |
Includes
corporate and other general company assets and
operations.
|
(3) |
Includes
elimination of intercompany sales, profit in inventory and intercompany
receivables. Intercompany
sale transactions are predominantly
from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International
Distribution Division.
|
(4) |
Long-lived
assets of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group includes assets
located in the Philippines which amounted to $1,907 and
$1,975 in first quarter 2008 and 2007, respectively and assets located
in
Denmark which amounted to $2,625 and $1,042 in first quarter 2008
and
2007, respectively.
|
18
Net
sales
by major geographic region, including those sales from the Commercial
Foodservice Equipment Group direct to international customers, were as follows
(in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Mar. 31, 2007
|
||||||
United
States and Canada
|
$
|
132,953
|
$
|
86,032
|
|||
Asia
|
7,152
|
5,473
|
|||||
Europe
and Middle East
|
16,371
|
10,777
|
|||||
Latin
America
|
4,407
|
3,413
|
|||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
160,883
|
$
|
105,695
|
13) |
Employee
Retirement Plans
|
(a) Pension
Plans
The
company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit plan for its union
employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility. Benefits are determined based upon
retirement age and years of service with the company. This defined benefit
plan
was frozen on April 30, 2002 and no further benefits accrue to the participants
beyond this date. Plan participants will receive or continue to receive payments
for benefits earned on or prior to April 30, 2002 upon reaching retirement
age.
The employees participating in the defined benefit plan were enrolled in a
newly
established 401K savings plan on September 30, 2002, further described below.
The
company also maintains a retirement benefit agreement with its Chairman. The
retirement benefits are based upon a percentage of the Chairman’s final base
salary. Additionally, the company maintains a retirement plan for non-employee
directors. The plan provides for an annual benefit upon a change in control
of
the company or retirement from the Board of Directors at age 70, equal to 100%
of the director’s last annual retainer, payable for a number of years equal to
the director’s years of service up to a maximum of 10 years.
Contributions
under the union plan are funded in accordance with provisions of The Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. There are no contributions expected
to
be made in 2008. Contributions to the directors' plan are based upon actual
retirement benefits as they retire.
(b) 401K
Savings Plans
The
company maintains two separate defined contribution 401K savings plans covering
all employees in the United States. These two plans separately cover the union
employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility and all other remaining union and
non-union employees in the United States. The company makes profit sharing
contributions to the various plans in accordance with the requirements of the
plan. Profit sharing contributions for the Elgin Union 401K savings plans are
made in accordance with the agreement.
19
14) |
Subsequent
Events
|
On
April
22, 2008, the company completed its acquisition of Giga Grandi Cucine, S.r.l
for
12.9 Euro including 6.2 million Euro paid in cash at closing, 3.4 million of
deferred payments due to the sellers, and 3.3 million Euro in assumed debt.
Giga
is a leading European manufacturer of a broad line of commercial cooking
equipment, including ranges, ovens and steam cooking equipment.
On
April
23, 2008, the company completed its acquisition of the net assets and related
business operations of FriFri aro SA from the Franke Group. FriFri is a leading
European manufacturer of frying systems.
20
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Informational
Note
This
report contains forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor created
by
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company cautions
readers that these projections are based upon future results or events and
are
highly dependent upon a variety of important factors which could cause such
results or events to differ materially from any forward-looking statements
which
may be deemed to have been made in this report, or which are otherwise made
by
or on behalf of the company. Such factors include, but are not limited to,
volatility in earnings resulting from goodwill impairment losses which may
occur
irregularly and in varying amounts; variability in financing costs; quarterly
variations in operating results; dependence on key customers; international
exposure; foreign exchange and political risks affecting international sales;
ability to protect trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property;
changing market conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing;
the
timely development and market acceptance of the company’s products; the
availability and cost of raw materials; and other risks detailed herein and
from
time-to-time in the company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings,
including the company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
21
Net
Sales Summary
(dollars
in thousands)
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Mar. 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||
Sales
|
Percent
|
Sales
|
Percent
|
||||||||||
Business
Divisions:
|
|||||||||||||
Commercial
Foodservice
|
$
|
134,016
|
83.3
|
$
|
90,539
|
85.7
|
|||||||
Food
Processing
|
19,888
|
12.4
|
12,196
|
11.5
|
|||||||||
International
Distribution(1)
|
15,793
|
9.8
|
13,576
|
12.8
|
|||||||||
Intercompany
sales (2)
|
(8,814
|
)
|
(5.5
|
)
|
(10,616
|
)
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
160,883
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
105,695
|
100.0
|
%
|
(1) |
Consists
of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products
manufactured
by third parties.
|
(2) |
Represents
the elimination of sales from
the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International
Distribution Division.
|
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of earnings items
as
a percentage of net sales for the periods.
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
Mar. 29, 2008
|
Mar. 31, 2007
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
63.4
|
61.1
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
36.6
|
38.9
|
|||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
20.4
|
21.1
|
|||||
Income
from operations
|
16.2
|
17.8
|
|||||
Net
interest expense and deferred financing amortization
|
2.3
|
1.2
|
|||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
0.2
|
(0.1
|
)
|
||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
13.7
|
16.7
|
|||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
5.5
|
6.6
|
|||||
Net
earnings
|
8.2
|
%
|
10.1
|
%
|
22
Three
Months Ended March 29, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended
March
31, 2007
NET
SALES. Net
sales
for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 were $160.9 million as compared to $105.7
million in the first quarter of 2007.
Net
sales
at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group amounted to $134.0 million in
the
first quarter of 2008 as compared to $90.5 million in the prior year quarter.
Net
sales
from the acquisitions of Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, Wells Bloomfield and Star which
were acquired on April 1, 2007, June 29, 2007, August 3, 2007 and December
31,
2007, respectively, accounted for an increase of $45.6 million during the first
quarter of 2008. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, net sales of commercial
foodservice equipment were flat, reflecting the impact of deferred customer
purchases due to slowed economic conditions.
Net
sales
for the Food Processing Equipment Group amounted to $19.9 million in the first
quarter of 2008 as compared to $12.2 million in the prior year quarter. Net
sales of MP Equipment, which was acquired on July 2, 2007, accounted for an
increase of $9.7 million. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, net sales of
food processing equipment decreased $2.0 million due to delayed customer
purchases as a result of economic uncertainties and quarterly
variations which
occur as a result of the timing of large orders.
Net
sales
at the International Distribution Division increased by $2.2 million to $15.8
million or 16%, reflecting higher sales in Asia, Europe and Latin America.
Increased international sales reflect increased business with restaurant chains
and increased pricing competitiveness driven by the weakened US dollar.
GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased to $58.9 million in the first quarter of 2008 from $41.1 million in the prior year period, reflecting the impact of higher sales volumes. The gross margin rate was 36.6% in the first quarter of 2008 as compared to 38.9% in the prior year quarter. The net decrease in the gross margin rate reflects:
·
|
Acquisition
accounting adjustments of $1.5 million to revalue inventories related
to Star which reduced gross margins in the first quarter.
|
·
|
The
adverse impact of steel costs which have risen significantly from
the
prior year quarter.
|
·
|
Lower
margins at the newly acquired Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, MP Equipment,
Wells
Bloomfield and Star operations which are in the process of being
integrated within the company.
|
23
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Combined
selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $22.3 million
in
the first quarter of 2007 to $32.9 million in the first quarter of 2008. As
a
percentage of net sales, operating expenses decreased from 21.1% in the first
quarter of 2007 to 20.4% in the first quarter of 2008. Selling expenses
increased from $11.1 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $16.2 million
in
the first quarter of 2008, reflecting $5.2 million of incremental costs
associated with the acquisitions of Jade completed on April 1, 2007,
Carter-Hoffmann, completed June 29, 2007, MP Equipment, completed July 2, 2007,
Wells Bloomfield, completed August 3, 2007 and Star completed on December 31,
2007. General and administrative expenses increased from $11.2 million in the
first quarter of 2007 to $16.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. General
and
administrative expenses reflects $4.5 million of costs associated with the
acquired operations of Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, MP Equipment, Wells Bloomfield
and
Star. Increased general and administrative costs also include increased non-cash
stock compensation costs which increased by $1.2 million from the prior year
first quarter.
NON-OPERATING
EXPENSES. Interest
and deferred financing amortization costs increased to $3.7 million in the
first
quarter of 2008 as compared to $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2007, due
to
increased borrowings resulting from recent acquisitions. Other expense of $0.4
million in the first quarter of 2008 compared unfavorably to other income of
$0.1 million in the prior year first quarter. Other expense in the first quarter
of 2008 included $0.2 million of unrealized losses on financing derivatives
and
$0.2 million of foreign exchange losses.
INCOME
TAXES. A
tax
provision of $8.7 million, at an effective rate of 40%, was recorded during
the
first quarter of 2008, as compared to a $6.9 million provision at a 39%
effective rate in the prior year quarter.
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
During
the three months ended March 29, 2008, cash and cash equivalents decreased
by
$2.0 million to $5.5 million at March 29, 2008 from $7.5 million at December
29,
2007. Net borrowings increased from $96.2 million at December 29, 2007 to $272.7
million at March 29, 2008.
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES. Net
cash
provided by operating activities was $12.6 million for the three-month period
ended March 29, 2008 compared to cash used of $4.4 million for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2007.
During
the three months ended March 29, 2008, working capital levels changed due to
normal business fluctuations, including the impact of increased seasonal working
capital needs. The changes in working capital included a $0.8 million decrease
in accounts receivable, a $1.6 million increase in inventory, a $3.8 million
decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets and a $5.5 million increase
in accounts payable. Accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities also
decreased by $17.7 million reflecting first quarter payout of customer rebates
and incentive compensation related to prior year programs.
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES. During
the three months ended March 29, 2008, net cash used in investing activities
amounted to $190.2 million. This includes $188.1 million associated with the
acquisition of Star, $1.2 million associated with the purchase of a
manufacturing facility for Carter Hoffmann which had been leased and $0.9
million of capital expenditures associated with additions and upgrades of
production equipment.
24
FINANCING ACTIVITIES. Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $175.6 million during the three months ended March 29, 2008. The net increase in debt includes $176.3 million in borrowings under the company’s $450 million revolving credit facility and $0.2 million of repayments of foreign bank loans.
At
March
29, 2008, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its
borrowing agreements. Management believes that future cash flows from operating
activities and borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility will
provide the company with sufficient financial resources to meet its anticipated
requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and debt amortization
for
the foreseeable future.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement
is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption
of
SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on the financial
statements.
In
December 2007, the FAS issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations”. This
statement provides companies with principles and requirements on how an acquirer
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree
as well as the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business
combination. This statement also requires certain disclosures to enable users
of
the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. Acquisition costs associated with the business combination
will generally be expensed as incurred. This statement is effective for business
combinations occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
Early adoption of FASB Statement No. 141R is not permitted. The company is
evaluating the impact the application of this guidance will have on the
company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company
will adopt this statement for acquisitons consummated after the statements
effective date.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This statement
amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Upon its adoption, effective as of the
beginning of the company’s 2009 fiscal year, noncontrolling interests will be
classified as equity in the company’s financial statements and income and
comprehensive income attributed to the noncontrolling interest will be included
in the company’s income and comprehensive income. The provisions of this
standard must be applied retrospectively upon adoption. The company does not
anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have a material impact on
its
financial statements.
25
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This statement
amends SFAS No. 133 to require enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative
and hedging activities. This Statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early application encouraged. The company is evaluating the impact the
application of this guidance will have on the company’s financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are
based upon the company's consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the
company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related disclosures.
On an
ongoing basis, the company evaluates its estimates and judgments based on
historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Revenue
Recognition.The
company recognizes revenue on the sale of its products when risk of loss
has
passed to the customer, which occurs at the time of shipment, and collectibility
is reasonably assured. The sale prices of the products sold are fixed and
determinable at the time of shipment. Sales are reported net of sales returns,
sales incentives and cash discounts based on prior experience and other
quantitative and qualitative factors.
At
the
food processing equipment group, the company enters into long-term sales
contracts for certain products. Revenue under these long term sales contracts
is
recognized using the percentage of completion method prescribed by Statement
of
Position No. 81-1 due to the length of time to fully manufacture and assemble
the equipment. The company measures revenue recognized based on the ratio
of
actual labor hours incurred in relation to the total estimated labor hours
to be
incurred related to the contract. Because estimated labor hours to complete
a
project are based upon forecasts using the best available information, the
actual hours may differ from the original estimates. The percentage of
completion method of accounting for these contracts most accurately reflects
the
status of these uncompleted contracts in the company’s financial statements and
most accurately measures the matching of revenues and expenses. At the time
a
loss on a contract becomes known, the amount of the estimated loss is recognized
in the consolidated financial statements.
Property
and equipment: Property
and equipment are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their
useful lives based on management's estimates of the period over which the assets
will be utilized to benefit the operations of the company. The useful lives
are
estimated based on historical experience with similar assets, taking into
account anticipated technological or other changes. The company
periodically reviews these lives relative to physical factors, economic factors
and industry trends. If there are changes in the planned use of property and
equipment or if technological changes were to occur more rapidly than
anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened,
resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense
in future periods.
Long-lived
assets: Long-lived
assets (including goodwill and other intangibles) are reviewed for impairment
annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the
recoverability of the company's long-lived assets, the company considers changes
in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash
flows and other factors. Estimates of future cash flows are judgments
based on the company's experience and knowledge of operations. These
estimates can be significantly impacted by many factors including changes in
global and local business and economic conditions, operating costs, inflation,
competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the company's
estimates or the underlying assumptions change in the future, the company may
be
required to record impairment charges.
Warranty: In
the
normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific
product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period
in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on
contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically
adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts
that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from
amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made
as
changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.
26
Litigation: From
time
to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The
company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers
compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The
company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or
outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses.
A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these
contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance
coverage. The reserve requirements may change in the future due to new
developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy
in
dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any pending
litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or
results of operations.
Income
taxes: The
company operates in numerous foreign and domestic taxing jurisdictions where
it
is subject to various types of tax, including sales tax and income tax.
The company's tax filings are subject to audits and adjustments. Because of
the
nature of the company’s operations, the nature of the audit items can be
complex, and the objectives of the government auditors can result in a tax
on
the same transaction or income in more than one state or country. The
company initially recognizes the financial statement effects of a tax position
when it more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position
will be sustained upon examiniation. For tax positions that meet the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the company initially and
subsequently measures its tax positions as the largest amount of tax benefit
that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon effective
settlement with the taxing authority. As part of the company's calculation
of
the provision for taxes, the company has recorded liabilities on various tax
positions that are currently under audit by the taxing authorities. The
liabilities may change in the future upon effective settlement of the tax
positions.
Contractual
Obligations
The
company's contractual cash payment obligations as of March 29, 2008 are set
forth below (in thousands):
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Deferred
|
Idle
|
Contractual
|
||||||||||||||
Acquisition
|
|
Long-term
|
Operating
|
Facility
|
Cash
|
|||||||||||
Costs
|
|
Debt
|
Leases
|
Leases
|
Obligations
|
|||||||||||
Less
than 1 year
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2,661
|
$
|
2,661
|
$
|
332
|
$
|
5,654
|
||||||
1-3
years
|
2,000
|
482
|
3,350
|
793
|
6,625
|
|||||||||||
3-5
years
|
—
|
1,814
|
903
|
870
|
3,587
|
|||||||||||
After
5 years
|
—
|
267,700
|
53
|
1,031
|
268,784
|
|||||||||||
$
|
2,000
|
$
|
272,657
|
$
|
6,967
|
$
|
3,026
|
$
|
284,650
|
Idle
facility leases consists of an obligation for a manufacturing location that
was
exited in conjunction with the company's manufacturing consolidation efforts.
This lease obligation continues through June 2015. This facility has been
subleased. The obligation presented above does not reflect any anticipated
sublease income from the facilities.
27
The
projected benefit obligation of the company’s defined benefit plans exceeded the
plans’ assets by $4.6 million at the end of 2007 as compared to $3.5 million at
the end of 2006. The unfunded benefit obligations were comprised of a $0.6
million under funding of the company's union plan and $4.0 million of under
funding of the company's director plans. The company does not expect to
contribute to the director plans in 2008. The company made minimum contributions
required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) of
$0.1 million in 2007 to the company's union plan. The company does not expect
to
make contributions in 2008 to the union plan.
The
company has $4.1 million in outstanding letters of credit, which expire on
March
29, 2009, to secure potential obligations under insurance programs.
The
company places purchase orders with its suppliers in the ordinary course of
business. These purchase orders are generally to fulfill short-term
manufacturing requirements of less than 90 days and most are cancelable with
a
restocking penalty. The company has no long-term purchase contracts or minimum
purchase obligations with any supplier.
The
company has contractual obligations under its various debt agreements to make
interest payments. These amounts are subject to the level of borrowings in
future periods and the interest rate for the applicable periods, and therefore
the amounts of these payments is not determinable.
The
company has an obligation to make $2.0 million of purchase price
payments to the sellers of MP Equipment that were deferred in conjunction with
the acquisition.
The
company has no activities, obligations or exposures associated with off-balance
sheet arrangements.
28
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
The
company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. The
following table summarizes the maturity of the company’s debt
obligations.
Fixed
|
Variable
|
||||||
Rate
|
Rate
|
||||||
Twelve Month Period Ending
|
Debt
|
Debt
|
|||||
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||
March
29, 2009
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2,661
|
|||
March
29, 2010
|
—
|
241
|
|||||
March
29, 2011
|
—
|
241
|
|||||
March
29, 2012
|
—
|
241
|
|||||
March
29, 2013
|
—
|
269,273
|
|||||
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
272,657
|
During
the fourth quarter of 2007 the company entered into a new senior secured credit
facility. Terms of the senior credit agreement provide for $450.0 million of
availability under a revolving credit line. As of March 29, 2008, the company
had $267.7 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The company
also has $4.1 million in outstanding letters of credit, which reduces the
borrowing availability under the revolving credit line.
Borrowings
under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate at
1.25% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate
and the Federal Funds Rate. At March 29, 2008 the average interest rate on
the
senior debt amounted to 4.21%. The interest rates on borrowings under the senior
bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based on the company’s defined
indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis. Additionally, a commitment
fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged on the unused portion of
the
revolving credit line. This variable commitment fee amounted to 0.25% as of
March 29, 2008.
In
August
2006, the company completed its acquisition of Houno A/S in Denmark. This
acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt facilities with
borrowings in Danish Krone. On March 29, 2008 these facilities amounted to
$5.0 million in US dollars, including $2.6 million outstanding under a revolving
credit facility and $2.4 million of a term loan. The interest rate on the
revolving credit facility is assessed at 1.25% above Euro LIBOR, which amounted
to 5.41% on March 29, 2008. The term loan matures in 2013 and the interest
rate
is assessed at 5.62%.
29
The
company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to
effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. The agreements swap
one-month LIBOR for fixed rates. As of March 29, 2008 the company had the
following interest rate swaps in effect:
Fixed
|
||||||||||
Notional
|
Interest
|
Effective
|
Maturity
|
|||||||
Amount
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Date
|
|||||||
$
10,000,000
|
5.030
|
%
|
03/03/06
|
12/21/09
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.520
|
%
|
2/13/2008
|
2/19/2009
|
||||||
$
20,000,000
|
2.635
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2009
|
||||||
$
25,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
1/14/2008
|
1/14/2010
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.920
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2010
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.785
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2010
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
3.033
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2011
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.820
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2009
|
The
terms
of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital
expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, certain ratios of
indebtedness and fixed charge coverage. The credit agreement also provides
that
if a material adverse change in the company’s business operations or conditions
occurs, the lender could declare an event of default. Under terms of the
agreement a material adverse effect is defined as (a) a material adverse change
in, or a material adverse effect upon, the operations, business properties,
condition (financial and otherwise) or prospects of the company and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the ability of
the
company to perform under the loan agreements and to avoid any event of default;
or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect
or
enforceability against the company of any loan document. A material adverse
effect is determined on a subjective basis by the company's creditors. The
credit facility is secured by the capital stock of the company’s domestic
subsidiaries, 65% of the capital stock of the company’s foreign subsidiaries and
substantially all other assets of the company. At March 29, 2008, the company
was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its borrowing
agreements.
30
Financing
Derivative Instruments
The
company has entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate applicable
to certain of its variable-rate debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for
a
fixed rates. The company has designated these swaps as cash flow hedges and
all
changes in fair value of the swaps are recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income. As of March 29, 2008, the fair value of these instruments
was $1.4 million. The change in fair value of these swap agreements in the
first
three months of 2008 was a loss of $0.5 million, net of taxes.
A
summary
of the company’s interest rate swaps is as follows:
Fixed
|
Changes
|
|||||||||||||||
Notional
|
Interest
|
Effective
|
Maturity
|
Fair Value
|
In Fair Value
|
|||||||||||
Amount
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Date
|
Mar. 29, 2008
|
(net of taxes)
|
|||||||||||
$
10,000,000
|
5.030
|
%
|
03/03/06
|
12/21/09
|
$ |
(462,000
|
)
|
$ |
(9,000
|
)1 | ||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.520
|
%
|
2/13/2008
|
2/19/2009
|
$ |
(28,000
|
)
|
$ |
(17,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
20,000,000
|
2.635
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2009
|
$ |
(65,000
|
)
|
$ |
(39,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
25,000,000
|
3.350
|
%
|
1/14/2008
|
1/14/2010
|
$ |
(464,000
|
)
|
$ |
(278,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.920
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2010
|
$ |
(106,000
|
)
|
$ |
(64,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.785
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2010
|
$ |
(47,000
|
)
|
$ |
(28,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
3.033
|
%
|
2/6/2008
|
2/6/2011
|
$ |
(81,000
|
)
|
$ |
(49,000
|
)
|
||||||
$
10,000,000
|
2.820
|
%
|
2/1/2008
|
2/1/2009
|
$ |
(100,000
|
)
|
$ |
(60,000
|
)
|
1 |
Previous
to the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2008, this swap had not been
designated as an effective cash flow hedge. The swap was designated
as an
effective cash flow hedge during the quarter ended March 29, 2008.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 133, the net reduction of $0.2 million in
the
fair value of this swap prior to the designation date has been recorded
as
a loss in earnings for the first quarter
2008.
|
Foreign
Exchange Derivative Financial Instruments
The
company uses foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts with terms
of
less than one year to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. The company’s primary hedging activities are to mitigate its exposure to
changes in exchange rates on intercompany and third party trade receivables
and
payables. The company does not currently enter into derivative financial
instruments for speculative purposes. In managing its foreign currency
exposures, the company identifies and aggregates naturally occurring offsetting
positions and then hedges residual balance sheet exposures. There was no forward
contract outstanding at the end of the quarter.
31
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
The
company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the company's Exchange Act reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to the company's management, including its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
As
of
March 29, 2008, the company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision
and
with the participation of the company's management, including the company's
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the
design and operation of the company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on the foregoing, the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the company's
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of this
period.
During
the quarter ended March 29, 2008, there has been no change in the company's
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or
is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting.
32
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
The
company was not required to report the information pursuant to Items 1 through
6
of Part II of Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 2008, except as
follows:
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes in the risk factors as set forth in the company's
2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid per Share |
Total
Number
of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicity Announced Plan or Program |
Maximum
Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plan or Program |
|||||||||
December 30, 2007 to January 26, 2008 | 4,869 | - | 4,869 | 842,132 | |||||||||
January 27, 2008 to February 23, 2008 | - | - | - | 842,132 | |||||||||
February 24, 2008 to March 29, 2008 | - | - | - | 842,132 | |||||||||
Quarter ended March 29, 2008 | 4,869 | - | 4,869 | 842,132 |
In
July
1998, the company's Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program that
authorized the purchase of common shares in open market purchases. As of March
29, 2008, 957,868 shares had been purchased under the 1998 stock repurchase
program. 4,869 shares were repurchased by the company during the three month
period ended March 29, 2008.
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibits
– The
following exhibits are filed herewith:
|
|
Exhibit
31.1 –
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
Exhibit
31.2 –
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Exhibit
32.1 –
|
Certification
by the Principal Executive Officer of The Middleby Corporation
Pursuant to
Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350).
|
Exhibit
32.2 –
|
Certification
by the Principal Financial Officer of The Middleby Corporation
Pursuant to
Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C.
1350).
|
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date
May 8, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Timothy J. FitzGerald
|
Timothy
J. FitzGerald
|
||
Vice
President,
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
34