Annual Statements Open main menu

MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)

Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20552
FORM 10-Q
þ     QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
Commission File Number 000-32561
(MBC LOGO)
Middlefield Banc Corp.
 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Ohio
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
  34 - 1585111
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
15985 East High Street, Middlefield, Ohio 44062-9263
(Address of principal executive offices)
(440) 632-1666
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o  Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity as of the latest practicle date:
Class: Common Stock, without par value
Outstanding at August 12, 2010: 1,577,771
 
 

 

 


 

MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
INDEX
         
    Page  
    Number  
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
       
 
       
Item 1. Financial Statements
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    15  
 
       
    26  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    28  
 
       
    28  
 
       
    28  
 
       
    28  
 
       
    28  
 
       
    28  
 
       
    32  
 
       
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32
 Exhibit 99

 

2


Table of Contents

MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
                 
    (Unaudited)        
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
ASSETS
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 15,065     $ 12,909  
Federal funds sold
    22,152       28,123  
Interest-bearing deposits in other institutions
    124       121  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents
    37,341       41,153  
Investment securities available for sale
    178,963       136,711  
Loans
    364,762       353,597  
Less allowance for loan losses
    5,834       4,937  
 
           
Net loans
    358,928       348,660  
Premises and equipment
    8,360       8,394  
Goodwill
    4,559       4,559  
Bank-owned life insurance
    7,839       7,706  
Accrued interest and other assets
    10,949       11,475  
 
           
 
               
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 606,939     $ 558,658  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES
               
Deposits:
               
Noninterest-bearing demand
  $ 51,118     $ 44,387  
Interest-bearing demand
    40,055       38,111  
Money market
    65,275       56,451  
Savings
    131,818       107,358  
Time
    244,829       240,799  
 
           
Total deposits
    533,095       487,106  
Short-term borrowings
    7,201       6,800  
Other borrowings
    25,040       25,865  
Accrued interest and other liabilities
    1,995       2,180  
 
           
TOTAL LIABILITIES
    567,331       521,951  
 
           
 
               
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Common stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, 1,767,301 and 1,754,112 shares issued
    28,201       27,919  
Retained earnings
    15,504       14,960  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    2,637       562  
Treasury stock, at cost; 189,530 shares in 2010 and 2009
    (6,734 )     (6,734 )
 
           
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    39,608       36,707  
 
           
 
               
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 606,939     $ 558,658  
 
           
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
INTEREST INCOME
                               
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 5,299     $ 4,906     $ 10,396     $ 9,904  
Interest-bearing deposits in other institutions
    3       3       7       10  
Federal funds sold
    12       3       23       7  
Investment securities:
                               
Taxable interest
    1,339       924       2,542       1,777  
Tax-exempt interest
    647       454       1,239       900  
Dividends on FHLB stock
    32       15       49       31  
 
                       
Total interest income
    7,332       6,305       14,256       12,629  
 
                       
 
                               
INTEREST EXPENSE
                               
Deposits
    2,373       2,559       4,858       5,275  
Short-term borrowings
    62       4       120       10  
Other borrowings
    183       238       373       495  
Trust preferred securities
    128       133       264       265  
 
                       
Total interest expense
    2,746       2,934       5,615       6,045  
 
                       
 
                               
NET INTEREST INCOME
    4,586       3,371       8,641       6,584  
 
                               
Provision for loan losses
    690       260       1,129       414  
 
                       
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
    3,896       3,111       7,512       6,170  
 
                       
 
                               
NONINTEREST INCOME
                               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    433       467       848       906  
Investment securities gains, net
    18             27        
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance
    65       60       132       129  
Other income
    169       109       287       225  
 
                       
Total noninterest income
    685       636       1,294       1,260  
 
                       
 
                               
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
                               
Salaries and employee benefits
    1,713       1,537       3,224       2,908  
Occupancy expense
    217       221       493       476  
Equipment expense
    204       150       402       273  
Data processing costs
    172       219       415       468  
Ohio state franchise tax
    134       124       270       247  
Federal deposit insurance expense
    190       271       392       443  
Professional fees
    188       132       380       285  
Loss on sale of other real estate owned
    175       55       214       55  
Other expense
    835       594       1,596       1,144  
 
                       
Total noninterest expense
    3,828       3,303       7,386       6,299  
 
                       
 
                               
Income before income taxes
    753       444       1,420       1,131  
Income taxes
    38       (17 )     60       67  
 
                       
NET INCOME
  $ 715     $ 461     $ 1,360     $ 1,064  
 
                       
 
                               
EARNINGS PER SHARE
                               
Basic
  $ 0.46     $ 0.30     $ 0.87     $ 0.69  
Diluted
    0.45       0.30       0.87       0.69  
 
                               
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
  $ 0.26     $ 0.26     $ 0.52     $ 0.52  
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except dividend per share amount)
(Unaudited)
                                                 
                    Accumulated                      
                    Other             Total        
    Common     Retained     Comprehensive     Treasury     Stockholders’     Comprehensive  
    Stock     Earnings     Income     Stock     Equity     Income  
 
Balance, December 31, 2009
  $ 27,919     $ 14,960     $ 562     $ (6,734 )   $ 36,707          
 
                                               
Net income
            1,360                       1,360     $ 1,360  
Other comprehensive income:
                                               
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities net of taxes of $1,069
                    2,075               2,075       2,075  
 
                                             
Comprehensive income
                                          $ 3,435  
 
                                             
Dividend reinvestment and purchase plan
    282                               282          
Cash dividends ($0.52 per share)
            (816 )                     (816 )        
 
                                     
 
                                               
Balance, June 30, 2010
  $ 28,201     $ 15,504     $ 2,637     $ (6,734 )   $ 39,608          
 
                                     

 

5


Table of Contents

MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30,  
    2010     2009  
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
               
Net income
  $ 1,360     $ 1,064  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used for operating activities:
               
Provision for loan losses
    1,129       414  
Depreciation and amortization
    381       294  
Amortization of premium and discount on investment securities
    (104 )     (191 )
Amortization of deferred loan fees, net
    (18 )     (35 )
Investment securities gains, net
    (26 )      
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance
    (132 )     (129 )
Deferred income taxes
    (403 )     207  
Expense related to stock options
          30  
Loss on sale of other real estate owned
    214       55  
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable
    (27 )     105  
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
    27       (223 )
Decrease (increase) in prepaid federal deposit insurance
    363       (75 )
Other, net
    (1,046 )     (531 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    1,718       985  
 
           
 
               
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Investment securities available for sale:
               
Proceeds from repayments and maturities
    15,067       10,571  
Purchases
    (59,185 )     (7,686 )
Proceeds from sale of securities
    5,140        
Increase in loans, net
    (11,855 )     (15,066 )
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
          (14 )
Purchase of premises and equipment
    (269 )     (145 )
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned
    540        
 
           
Net cash used for investing activities
    (50,562 )     (12,340 )
 
           
 
               
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Net increase in deposits
    45,990       15,680  
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings, net
    401       (648 )
Repayment of other borrowings
    (825 )     (3,798 )
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment & purchase plan
    282       286  
Cash dividends
    (816 )     (800 )
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    45,032       10,720  
 
           
 
               
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (3,812 )     (635 )
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
    41,153       17,455  
 
           
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
  $ 37,341     $ 16,820  
 
           
 
               
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
               
Cash paid during the year for:
               
Interest on deposits and borrowings
  $ 5,588     $ 6,268  
Income taxes
    750       275  
 
               
Non-cash investing transactions:
               
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned
  $ 476     $ 721  
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements of Middlefield Banc Corp. (“Company”) include its two bank subsidiaries The Middlefield Banking Company (“MB”) and Emerald Bank (“EB”) and a non-bank asset resolution subsidiary EMORECO. All significant inter-company items have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In management’s opinion, the financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, that the Company considers necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position and the results of operations and cash flows. The balance sheet at December 31, 2009, has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the necessary informational disclosures and footnotes as required by U. S. generally accepted accounting principles. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included with the Company’s Form 10-K (File No. 000-32561). The results of the Company’s operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of the Company’s operations for any other interim period or for a full fiscal year.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-16, Accounting for Transfer of Financial Assets. ASU 2009-16 provides guidance to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that an entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. ASU 2009-16 is effective for annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-01, Equity (Topic 505): Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash — a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. ASU 2010-01 clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend. ASU 2010-01 is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and should be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Accounting and reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary — a Scope Clarification. ASU 2010-02 amends Subtopic 810-10 to address implementation issues related to changes in ownership provisions including clarifying the scope of the decrease in ownership and additional disclosures. ASU 2010-02 is effective beginning in the period that an entity adopts Statement 160. If an entity has previously adopted Statement 160, ASU 2010-02 is effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009 and should be applied retrospectively to the first period Statement 160 was adopted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-04, Accounting for Various Topics — Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs. ASU 2010-04 makes technical corrections to existing SEC guidance including the following topics: accounting for subsequent investments, termination of an interest rate swap, issuance of financial statements — subsequent events, use of residential method to value acquired assets other than goodwill, adjustments in assets and liabilities for holding gains and losses, and selections of discount rate used for measuring defined benefit obligation. ASU 2010-04 is effective January 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-05, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Escrowed Share Arrangements and the Presumption of Compensation. ASU 2010-05 updates existing guidance to address the SEC staff’s views on overcoming the presumption that for certain shareholders escrowed share arrangements represent compensation. ASU 2010-05 is effective January 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.

 

7


Table of Contents

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to clarify existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08, Technical Corrections to Various Topics. ASU 2010-08 clarifies guidance on embedded derivatives and hedging. ASU 2010-08 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.
In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging. ASU 2010-11 provides clarification and related additional examples to improve financial reporting by resolving potential ambiguity about the breadth of the embedded credit derivative scope exception in ASC 815-15-15-8. ASU 2010-11 is effective at the beginning of the first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. ASU 2010-13 provides guidance on the classification of a share-based payment award as either equity or a liability. A share-based payment that contains a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition is required to be classified as a liability. ASU 2010-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is a Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset — a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. ASU 2010-18 clarifies the treatment for a modified loan that was acquired as part of a pool of assets. Refinancing or restructuring the loan does not make it eligible for removal from the pool, the FASB said. The amendment will be effective for loans that are part of an asset pool and are modified during financial reporting periods that end July 15, 2010 or later and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In July 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. ASU 2010-20 is intended to provide additional information to assist financial statement users in assessing an entity’s credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. The disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments in ASU 2010-20 encourage, but do not require, comparative disclosures for earlier reporting periods that ended before initial adoption. However, an entity should provide comparative disclosures for those reporting periods ending after initial adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 2 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has no unrecognized stock-based compensation costs or unvested stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2010.
Stock option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
                                 
            Weighted-             Weighted-  
            average             average  
            Exercise             Exercise  
    2010     Price     2009     Price  
 
                               
Outstanding, January 1
    99,219     $ 26.85       110,465     $ 27.21  
Granted
                       
Exercised
                       
Forfeited
                (7,575 )     33.60  
 
                           
 
                               
Outstanding, June 30
    99,219     $ 26.85       102,890     $ 26.74  
 
                           

 

8


Table of Contents

NOTE 3 — EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company provides dual presentation of Basic and Diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share utilizes net income as reported as the numerator and the actual average shares outstanding as the denominator. Diluted earnings per share includes any dilutive effects of options, warrants, and convertible securities.
There are no convertible securities that would affect the numerator in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share; therefore, net income as presented on the Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited) will be used as the numerator. The following tables set forth the composition of the weighted-average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computation.
                                 
    For the Three     For the Six  
    Months Ended     Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    1,760,382       1,731,490       1,757,698       1,729,344  
 
                               
Average treasury stock shares
    (189,530 )     (189,530 )     (189,530 )     (189,530 )
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic earnings per share
    1,570,852       1,541,960       1,568,168       1,539,814  
 
                               
Additional common stock equivalents (stock options) used to calculate diluted earnings per share
    1,232       1,578       1,574       1,591  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate diluted earnings per share
    1,572,084       1,543,538       1,569,742       1,541,405  
 
                       
Options to purchase 89,077 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $22.33 to $40.24 were outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2010 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as they were anti-dilutive due to the strike price being greater than the market price as of June 30, 2010. Options to purchase 92,616 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $22.33 to $40.24 were outstanding during six months ended June 30, 2009 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share.
NOTE 4 — COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of comprehensive income consist exclusively of unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, this activity is shown under the heading Comprehensive Income as presented in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited).

 

9


Table of Contents

The following shows the components and activity of comprehensive income during the periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (net of the income tax effect):
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
(Dollar amounts in thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period on securities held
  $ 1,401     $ 570     $ 2,093     $ 39  
 
                               
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
    (12 )           (18 )      
 
                       
 
                               
Net change in unrealized gains during the period
    1,389       570       2,075       39  
Unrealized holding gains (losses), beginning of period
    1,248       (826 )     562       (295 )
 
                       
 
                               
Unrealized holding gains (losses), end of period
    2,637       (256 )     2,637       (256 )
 
                       
 
                               
Net income
    715       461       1,360       1,064  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
                               
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period
    1,389       570       2,075       39  
 
                       
 
                               
Comprehensive income
  $ 2,104     $ 1,031     $ 3,435     $ 1,103  
 
                       
NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for an asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. GAAP established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation methodologies into the following three levels:
     
Level I:
  Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
 
   
Level II:
  Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
 
   
Level III:
  Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observe ability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.
The following tables present the assets measured on a recurring basis on the consolidated balance sheet at their fair value as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
                                 
    June 30, 2010  
(Dollar amounts in thousands)   Level I     Level II     Level III     Total  
 
                               
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $     $ 22,342     $     $ 22,342  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
          77,148             77,148  
Mortgage-backed securities
          78,550             78,550  
 
                       
Total debt securities
          178,040             178,040  
Equity securities
    923                   923  
 
                       
Total
  $ 923     $ 178,040     $     $ 178,963  
 
                       

 

10


Table of Contents

                                 
    December 31, 2009  
    Level I     Level II     Level III     Total  
 
                               
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $     $ 18,330     $     $ 18,330  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
          56,720             56,720  
Mortgage-backed securities
          60,742             60,742  
 
                       
Total debt securities
          135,792             135,792  
Equity securities
    919                   919  
 
                       
Total
  $ 919     $ 135,792     $     $ 136,711  
 
                       
Financial instruments are considered Level III when their values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for Level III financial instruments typically also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable either directly or indirectly. Level III financial instruments also include those for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. The Company has no securities considered to be Level III as of June 30, 2010.
The Company uses prices compiled by third party vendors due to the recent stabilization in the markets along with improvements in third party pricing methodology that have narrowed the variances between third party vendor prices and actual market prices.
The following tables present the assets measured on a nonrecurring basis on the consolidated balance sheet at their fair value as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are written down to fair value through the establishment of specific reserves. Techniques used to value the collateral that secure the impaired loan include: quoted market prices for identical assets classified as Level I inputs; observable inputs, employed by certified appraisers, for similar assets classified as Level II inputs. In cases where valuation techniques included inputs that are unobservable and are based on estimates and assumptions developed by management based on the best information available under each circumstance, the asset valuation is classified as Level III inputs.
                                 
    June 30, 2010  
(Dollar amounts in thousands)   Level I     Level II     Level III     Total  
 
                               
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
                               
Impaired loans
          4,960       2,360       7,320  
Other real estate owned
          1,886             1,886  
                                 
    December 31, 2009  
    Level I     Level II     Level III     Total  
 
                               
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
                               
Impaired loans
  $     $ 5,644     $ 149     $ 5,793  
Other real estate owned
          2,164             2,164  

 

11


Table of Contents

The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
                                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    Carrying     Fair     Carrying     Fair  
(Dollar amounts in thousands)   Value     Value     Value     Value  
 
                               
Financial assets:
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 37,341     $ 37,341     $ 41,153     $ 41,153  
Investment securities Available for sale
    178,963       178,963       136,711       136,711  
Net loans
    358,928       340,520       348,660       332,401  
Bank-owned life insurance
    7,839       7,839       7,706       7,706  
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
    1,887       1,887       1,887       1,887  
Accrued interest receivable
    1,439       1,439       1,411       1,411  
 
                               
Financial liabilities:
                               
Deposits
  $ 533,095     $ 538,810     $ 487,106     $ 491,436  
Short-term borrowings
    7,201       7,201       6,800       68,003  
Other borrowings
    25,040       27,802       25,865       27,356  
Accrued interest payable
    920       920       905       905  
Financial instruments are defined as cash, evidence of ownership interest in an entity, or a contract which creates an obligation or right to receive or deliver cash or another financial instrument from/to a second entity on potentially favorable or unfavorable terms.
Fair value is defined as the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties other than in a forced liquidation sale. If a quoted market price is available for a financial instrument, the estimated fair value would be calculated based upon the market price per trading unit of the instrument.
If no readily available market exists, the fair value estimates for financial instruments should be based upon management’s judgment regarding current economic conditions, interest rate risk, expected cash flows, future estimated losses, and other factors as determined through various option pricing formulas or simulation modeling. Since many of these assumptions result from judgments made by management based upon estimates which are inherently uncertain, the resulting estimated fair values may not be indicative of the amount realizable in the sale of a particular financial instrument. In addition, changes in assumptions on which the estimated fair values are based may have a significant impact on the resulting estimated fair values.
As certain assets such as deferred tax assets and premises and equipment are not considered financial instruments, the estimated fair value of financial instruments would not represent the full value of the Company.
The Company employed simulation modeling in determining the estimated fair value of financial instruments for which quoted market prices were not available based upon the following assumptions:
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, Accrued Interest Receivable, Accrued Interest Payable, and Short-Term Borrowings
The fair value is equal to the current carrying value.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
The fair value is equal to the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies.
Investment Securities Available for Sale
The fair value of investment securities is equal to the available quoted market price. If no quoted market price is available, fair value is estimated using the quoted market price for similar securities. Fair value for certain private-label collateralized mortgage obligations were determined utilizing discounted cash flow models, due to the absence of a current market to provide reliable market quotes for the instruments.

 

12


Table of Contents

Loans
The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current market inputs at which loans with similar terms and qualities would be made to borrowers of similar credit quality. Where quoted market prices were available, primarily for certain residential mortgage loans, such market rates were utilized as estimates for fair value.
Deposits and Other Borrowed Funds
The fair values of certificates of deposit and other borrowed funds are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rates are estimated using rates currently offered for similar instruments with similar remaining maturities. Demand, savings, and money market deposits are valued at the amount payable on demand as of year-end.
Commitments to Extend Credit
These financial instruments are generally not subject to sale, and estimated fair values are not readily available. The carrying value, represented by the net deferred fee arising from the unrecognized commitment or letter of credit, and the fair value, determined by discounting the remaining contractual fee over the term of the commitment using fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements with similar credit risk, are not considered material for disclosure.
NOTE 6 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
The amortized cost and fair values of securities available for sale are as follows:
                                 
    June 30, 2010  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
(Dollar amounts in thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
 
                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 22,074     $ 268     $     $ 22,342  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
                               
Taxable
    7,874       220       (9 )     8,085  
Tax-exempt
    68,102       1,230       (269 )     69,063  
Mortgage-backed securities
    75,973       3,170       (593 )     78,550  
 
                       
Total debt securities
    174,023       4,888       (871 )     178,040  
Equity securities
    944       80       (101 )     923  
 
                       
Total
  $ 174,967     $ 4,968     $ (972 )   $ 178,963  
 
                       
                                 
    December 31, 2009  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
 
                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 18,657     $ 38     $ (365 )   $ 18,330  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
                               
Taxable
    3,451       10       (86 )     3,375  
Tax-exempt
    52,752       943       (349 )     53,345  
Mortgage-backed securities
    60,055       1,817       (1,130 )     60,742  
 
                       
Total debt securities
    134,915       2,807       (1,930 )     135,792  
Equity securities
    944       80       (105 )     919  
 
                       
Total
  $ 135,859     $ 2,887     $ (2,035 )   $ 136,711  
 
                       

 

13


Table of Contents

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2010, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
                 
    Amortized     Fair  
(Dollar amounts in thousands)   Cost     Value  
 
               
Due in one year or less
  $ 1,608     $ 1,632  
Due after one year through five years
    6,484       6,849  
Due after five years through ten years
    22,850       23,432  
Due after ten years
    143,081       146,127  
 
           
 
               
Total
  $ 174,023     $ 178,040  
 
           
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale were $5.1 million and $0 during the six-months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Gross gains realized were $27,000 and $0 during the six-months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale were $1.2 million and $0 during the three-months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Gross gains realized were $18,000 and $0 during the three-months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
The following table shows the Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.
                                                 
    June 30, 2010  
    Less than Twelve Months     Twelve Months or Greater     Total  
            Gross             Gross             Gross  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
(Dollar amounts in thousands)   Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
 
                                               
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
  $ 17,126     $ 176     $ 1,433     $ 103     $ 18,559     $ 279  
Mortgage-backed securities
    5,036       35       2,656       557       7,692       592  
Equity securities
    580       68       13       33       593       101  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 22,742     $ 279     $ 4,102     $ 693     $ 26,844     $ 972  
 
                                   
                                                 
    December 31, 2009  
    Less than Twelve Months     Twelve Months or Greater     Total  
            Gross             Gross             Gross  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
 
                                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 17,134     $ (365 )   $     $     $ 17,134     $ (365 )
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    21,594       (314 )     1,417       (121 )     23,011       (435 )
Mortgage-backed securities
    18,509       (334 )     4,064       (796 )     22,573       (1,130 )
Equity securities
    580       (68 )     8       (37 )     588       (105 )
 
                                   
Total
  $ 57,817     $ (1,082 )   $ 5,489     $ (953 )   $ 63,306     $ (2,035 )
 
                                   
There were 26 and 103 securities that were considered temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

 

14


Table of Contents

On a quarterly basis, the Company performs an assessment to determine whether there have been any events or economic circumstances indicating that a security with an unrealized loss has suffered other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 320 “Investments — Debt and Equity Securities. A debt security is considered impaired if the fair value is less than its amortized cost basis at the reporting date. The accounting literature requires the Company to assess whether the unrealized loss is other-than-temporary. Prior to the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 which was subsequently incorporated into FASB ASC Topic 320 “Investments — Debt and Equity Securities, unrealized losses that were determined to be temporary were recorded, net of tax, in other comprehensive income for available for sale securities, whereas unrealized losses related to held-to-maturity securities determined to be temporary were not recognized. Regardless of whether the security was classified as available for sale or held to maturity, unrealized losses that were determined to be other-than-temporary were recorded to earnings. An unrealized loss was considered other-than-temporary if (i) it was probable that the holder would not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the debt security, or (ii) the fair value was below the amortized cost of the debt security for a prolonged period of time and the Company did not have the positive intent and ability to hold the security until recovery or maturity.
The Company adopted this ASC during the second quarter of 2009 which amended the OTTI model for debt securities. Under the new guidance, OTTI losses must be recognized in earnings if an investor has the intent to sell the debt security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. However, even if a Company does not expect to sell a debt security, it must evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has occurred.
Under this ASC, an unrealized loss is generally deemed to be other-than-temporary and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis of the debt security. As a result the credit loss component of an OTTI is recorded as a component of investment securities gains (losses) in the accompanying consolidated statement of income, while the remaining portion of the impairment loss is recognized in other comprehensive income, provided the Company does not intend to sell the underlying debt security and it is “more likely than not” that the company will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery.
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies, U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, and state and political subdivisions accounted for more than 87% of the total available-for-sale portfolio as of June 30, 2010 and no credit losses are expected, given the explicit and implicit guarantees provided by the U.S. federal government and the lack of significant unrealized loss positions within the obligations of state and political subdivisions security portfolio. The Company’s assessment was concentrated mainly on private-label collateralized mortgage obligations of approximately $19.7 million for which the Company evaluates credit losses on a quarterly basis. Gross unrealized gain and loss positions related to these private-label collateralized mortgage obligations amounted to $1.3 million and $588,000, respectively. The Company considered the following factors in determining whether a credit loss exists and the period over which the debt security is expected to recover:
    The length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis.
 
    Changes in the near term prospects of the underlying collateral of a security such as changes in default rates, loss severity given default and significant changes in prepayment assumptions;
 
    The level of cash flows generated from the underlying collateral supporting the principal and interest payments of the debt securities; and
 
    Any adverse change to the credit conditions and liquidity of the issuer, taking into consideration the latest information available about the overall financial condition of the issuer, credit ratings, recent legislation and government actions affecting the issuer’s industry and actions taken by the issuer to deal with the present economic climate.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, there were no available-for-sale debt securities with an unrealized loss that has suffered OTTI.
NOTE 7 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
None
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis provides further detail to the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with the notes and financial statements presented in this report.
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
General. The Company’s total assets increased by $48.3 million or 8.6% from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010 to a balance of $606.9 million. Investment securities and net loans increased $42.3 million and $10.3 million, respectively. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $3.8 million at June 30, 2010. The increase in total assets reflects a corresponding increase in total liabilities of $45.4 million or 8.7% and an increase in stockholders’ equity of $2.9 million or 7.9%. The increase in total liabilities was the result of deposit growth of $46.0 million. The increase in stockholders’ equity was the result of increases in common stock, retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income of $282,000, $544,000 and $2.1 million respectively.

 

15


Table of Contents

Cash on hand and due from banks. Cash and due from banks, Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other institutions represent cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents declined $3.8 million or 9.3% to $37.3 million at June 30, 2010 from $41.1 million at December 31, 2009. Deposits from customers into savings and checking accounts, loan and security repayments and proceeds from borrowed funds typically increase these accounts. Decreases result from customer withdrawals, new loan originations, security purchases and repayments of borrowed funds.
Investment securities. Investment securities available for sale ended the June 30, 2010 quarter at $179.0 million an increase of $42.3 million or 30.9% from $136.7 million at December 31, 2009. During this period the Company recorded purchases of available for sale securities of $59.2 million, consisting of purchases of mortgage-backed securities, municipal and U.S. government agency bonds. Offsetting the purchases of securities were repayments and maturities of securities of $15.1 million and sales of mortgage backed securities totaling $5.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. In addition, the securities portfolio increased approximately $3.1 million due to an increase in the fair value. These fair value adjustments represent temporary fluctuations resulting from changes in market rates in relation to average yields in the available for sale portfolio. If securities are held to their respective maturity dates, no fair value gain or loss will be realized.
Loans receivable. The loans receivable category consists primarily of single family mortgage loans used to purchase or refinance personal residences located within the Company’s market area and commercial real estate loans used to finance properties that are used in the borrowers businesses or to finance investor-owned rental properties, and to a lesser extent commercial, real estate construction and consumer loans. Net loans receivable increased $10.3 million or 2.9% to $358.9 million as of June 30, 2010 from $348.7 million at December 31, 2009. Included in this amount was an increase in the commercial real estate loan and real estate construction portfolios of $4.3 million or 5.5% and $3.7 million or 47.3%, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The Company’s lending philosophy is to focus on commercial loans and to attempt to grow that segment of the portfolio. To attract and build the commercial loan portfolio, the Company has taken a proactive approach in contacting new and current clients to ensure that the Company is servicing its client’s needs. These lending relationships generally offer more attractive returns than residential loans and also offer opportunities for attracting larger balance deposit relationships. However, the shift in loan portfolio mix from residential real estate to commercial oriented loans may increase credit risk.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Asset Quality. For the first half of 2010, because of continued high unemployment, depressed real estate values for both residential and commercial properties and sustained economic weakness in the Company’s market area, management believes that non-performing assets may increase further and feel it is prudent to continue funding the allowance for loan losses at higher than historical levels.
The Company increased the allowance for loan losses to $5.8 million, or 1.60% of total loans, at June 30, 2010, compared to $4.9 million, or 1.40%, at December 31, 2009. The increase in the allowance for loan losses was necessitated by loan downgrades and an increase to specific reserves for impaired commercial real estate loans, coupled with the impact of charge-offs remaining at historically elevated levels. For the quarter ended June 30, 2010 net loan charge-offs totaled $135,000, or 0.04% of average loans, and year-to-date net loan charge-offs totaled $232,000, or 0.06% of average loans. To maintain the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company recorded a second quarter provision for loan losses of $690,000, versus $260,000 for the second quarter of 2009.
Management analyzes the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses regularly through reviews of the performance of the loan portfolio considering economic conditions, changes in interest rates and the effect of such changes on real estate values and changes in the amount and composition of the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is a material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant changes in the near term. Such evaluation, which includes a review of all loans for which full collectability may not be reasonably assured, considers among other matters, historical loan loss experience, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, current interest rates, trends in the borrower’s industry and other factors that management believes warrant recognition in providing for an appropriate allowance for loan losses. Future additions to the allowance for loan losses will be dependent on these factors. Additionally, the Company utilizes an outside party to conduct an independent review of commercial and commercial real estate loans. The Company uses the results of this review to help determine the effectiveness of the existing policies and procedures, and to provide an independent assessment of the allowance for loan losses allocated to these types of loans. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses was appropriately stated at June 30, 2010. Based on the variables involved and the fact that management must make judgments about outcomes that are uncertain, the determination of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy.
Non-performing assets. Non-performing assets includes non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings (TDR), loans 90 days or more past due, assets purchased by EMORECO from EB in November 2009, other real estate, and repossessed assets. A loan is classified as non-accrual when, a loan becomes 90 days past due in principal and interest or in the opinion of management, there are serious doubts about the collectability of interest and principal. At that time the accrual of interest is discontinued, future income is recognized only when cash is received and is not applied to the principal. TDRs are those loans which the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that the Company would not otherwise consider. The Company had two TDR’s with a combined principal balance of $524,000 as of June 30, 2010. Non-performing loans amounted to $20.1 million or 5.5% and $16.3 million or 4.6% of total loans at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The increase in nonperforming loans has occurred primarily in the commercial loan portfolio and in one-to-four family real estate loans. Non-performing loans secured by real estate totaled $15.9 million as of June 30, 2010, up $3.0 million from $12.9 million at December 31, 2009. The depressed state of the economy and continued levels of high unemployment have contributed to this trend, as well as the decline in the housing market across our geographic footprint that reflected declining home prices and increasing inventories of houses for sale. Real estate owned is written down to fair value at its initial recording and continually monitored.

 

16


Table of Contents

Nonperforming Assets and Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table indicates asset quality data over the past five quarters.
                                         
(Dollar amounts in thousands)   6/30/10     3/31/10     12/31/09     9/30/09     6/30/09  
 
                                       
Nonperforming loans
  $ 20,053     $ 18,143     $ 16,285     $ 14,368     $ 14,023  
Real estate owned
  $ 1,886     $ 2,175     $ 2,164     $ 1,775     $ 1,967  
 
                                       
Nonperforming assets
  $ 21,939     $ 20,318     $ 18,449     $ 16,143     $ 15,990  
 
                                       
Allowance for loan losses
  $ 5,834     $ 5,279     $ 4,937     $ 4,422     $ 3,668  
 
                                       
Ratios
                                       
Nonperforming loans to total loans
    5.50 %     5.04 %     4.61 %     4.15 %     4.18 %
Nonperforming assets to total assets
    3.61 %     3.42 %     3.30 %     3.12 %     3.33 %
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
    1.60 %     1.47 %     1.40 %     1.28 %     1.09 %
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
    29.09 %     29.10 %     30.32 %     30.78 %     26.16 %
A major factor in determining the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is the type of collateral which secures the loans. Of the total nonperforming loans at June 30, 2010, 79.5% were secured by real estate. Although this does not insure against all losses, the real estate provides substantial recovery, even in a distressed-sale and declining-value environment. In response to the poor economic conditions which have eroded the performance of the Company’s loan portfolio, additional resources have been allocated to the loan workout process. The Company’s objective is to work with the borrower to minimize the burden of the debt service and to minimize the future loss exposure to the Company.
Deposits. The Company considers various sources when evaluating funding needs, including but not limited to deposits, which are a significant source of funds totaling $533.1 million or 94.3% of the Company’s total funding sources at June 30, 2010. Total deposits increased $46.0 million or 9.4% to $533.1 million at June 30, 2010 from $487.1 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in deposits is primarily related to the growth of savings deposits, money market and noninterest-bearing accounts of $24.5 million or 22.8%, $8.8 million or 15.6% and $6.7 million or 15.2%, respectively.
Borrowed funds. The Company utilizes short and long-term borrowings as another source of funding for asset growth and liquidity needs. These borrowings primarily include FHLB advances, junior subordinated debt, short-term borrowings from other banks and repurchase agreements. Short-term borrowings increased $401,000 or 5.9% to $7.2 million as of June 30, 2010 from $6.8 at December 31, 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 other borrowings declined $825,000 which represents advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. The decline in FHLB advances was the result of scheduled principal payments.
Stockholders’ equity. Stockholders’ equity increased $2.9 million or 7.9% to $39.6 million at June 30, 2010 from $36.7 million at December 31, 2009. This increase was the result of increases in common stock, retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income of $282,000, $544,000 and $2.1 million, respectively. The increase of accumulated other comprehensive income was the result of an increase in the fair value of the Company’s securities available for sale portfolio. The increase in common stock was the result of issuing 13,189 shares through the Company’s dividend reinvestment and purchase plan at an average price of $21.30 since December 31, 2009.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General. Net income for the second quarter of 2010 totaled $715,000, a $254,000, or 55.1% increase from the $461,000 earned during the second quarter of 2009. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was $1.4 million, a $296,000, or 27.8% increase from the $1.1 million earned during the same period in 2009. Diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2010 were $0.45 compared to $0.30 for the same period in 2009. Year-to-date diluted earnings per share were $0.87 in 2010 compared to $0.69 in 2009.

 

17


Table of Contents

The Company’s annualized return on average assets (ROA) and return on average equity (ROE) for the second quarter of 2010 were 0.47% and 7.48%, respectively, compared with 0.39% and 5.22% for the second quarter of 2009. For the first six months of 2010, the Company’s annualized ROA was 0.46% compared to 0.45% in 2009, while the ROE was 7.27% compared to 6.04% for the same period of 2009.
The Company’s earnings for the quarter and the year were positively impacted by an increase in loan and investment interest income combined with a decrease in interest expense. This was partially offset by increases in the provision for loan losses and non-interest expense.
Net interest income. Net interest income, the primary source of revenue for the Company, is determined by the Company’s interest rate spread, which is defined as the difference between income on earning assets and the cost of funds supporting those assets, and the relative amounts of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Management periodically adjusts the mix of assets and liabilities, as well as the rates earned or paid on those assets and liabilities in order to manage and improve net interest income. The level of interest rates and changes in the amount and composition of interest earning assets and liabilities affect the Company’s net interest income. Historically from an interest rate risk perspective, it has been management’s goal to maintain steady net interest income growth while managing the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations by pricing and growth strategies.
Net interest income totaled $4.6 million for the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 36.0% from the $3.4 million reported for the comparable period of 2009. The net interest margin of 3.49% for the second quarter of 2010 showed improvement over the 3.28% reported for the same quarter of 2009. The increase in the net interest margin is primarily attributable to the increases in investment securities and loan interest of $608,000 and $393,000, respectively, and reduced cost of interest-bearing liabilities by $189,000 compared to the same period in 2009.
Net interest income increased $2.1 million, or 31.2% to $8.6 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year. For the same reason as the second quarter the net interest margin was positively impacted by increases in investment securities interest of $1.1 million and loan interest of $492,000 coupled with the reduced cost of interest-bearing liabilities by $430,000 when compared to the same period in 2009. The net interest margin of 3.39% for the first two quarters of 2010 was up from the 3.22% reported for the same period of 2009. The increasing margin for the first six months of the year is primarily attributable to deposit growth in products which generally carry lower interest costs than other deposit alternatives allowing for increased loan underwriting and the purchase of investment securities that maximize the Company’s interest income.
Interest income. Interest income increased $1.0 million, or 16.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. This can be attributed to a $124.8 million increase in average interest earning assets when compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was partially offset by a 52 basis point decline on the yield of average interest-earning assets. Interest income increased $1.6 million, or 12.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase can be attributed to the growth of average interest-earning assets by $112.7 million. A decrease of 56 basis points offset some of the gains from the increased levels of interest-earning assets.
Interest earned on loans receivable increased $393,000, or 8.0%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was attributable to a $32.6 million or a 9.9% increase in the average balance of loans receivable from June 30, 2009. This increase was partially offset by a decline in the yield on the total loan portfolio of 10 basis points to 5.88% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from 5.98% for the same period in the prior year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, interest earned on loans receivable increased $492,000, or 5.0%, compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was attributable to an increase in the average balance of loans outstanding of $32.8 million, or 10.0%, to $359.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $326.2 million for the same period in the prior year. This increase was partially offset by a decline in the yield on the total loan portfolio of 28 basis points to 5.84% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from 6.12% for the same period in the prior year.
Interest earned on securities increased $608,000, or 44.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily the result of an increase in the average balance of the securities portfolio of $69.5 million, or 67.0%, to $173.3 million at June 30, 2010 from $103.8 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase of interest earned on investment securities was partially offset by a decrease in the yield on the average investments to 5.37% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from 6.23% for the same period in the prior year.
Interest earned on securities increased $1.1 million, or 61.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily the result of an increase in the average balance of the securities portfolio of $58.2 million, or 55.8%, to $162.6 million at June 30, 2010 from $104.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase of interest earned on investment securities was partially offset by a decrease of 59 basis points to 5.48% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from 6.07% for the same period in the prior year.

 

18


Table of Contents

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $188,000, or 6.4%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. The decline in interest expense can be attributed to decreases in interest incurred on deposits and borrowings of $186,000 and $3,000, respectively. This reduction in interest cost was mainly due to the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities which declined by 83 basis points when comparing the two quarters.
Interest expense decreased $430,000, or 7.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. The year-to-date decline is the result of the same factors listed above. Interest incurred on deposit decreased $417,000 and borrowings declined $12,000 when compared to the first half of 2009. These decreases were partially offset by increased deposits.
Interest incurred on deposits, the largest component of the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities, decreased $186,000, or 7.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. Interest expense was positively affected by a reduction in the cost of interest-bearing deposits to 2.08% from 2.82% for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The reduced cost was partially offset by the average balance of interest-bearing deposits which increased by $116.7 million, or 32.0%, to $481.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $364.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The Company diligently monitors the interest rates on its products as well as the rates being offered by its competition and utilizing rate surveys to keep its total interest expense costs down.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010 interest incurred on deposits declined $417,000, or 7.9%, compared to the same period in the prior year. This was primarily attributable to a decrease in interest expense which was positively affected by a reduction in the cost of interest-bearing deposits to 2.08% from 2.96% for the six months June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The reduction in interest costs was partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits of $111.6 million, or 31.1%, to $470.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $359.2 million for the same period in the prior year.
Interest incurred on borrowed funds, declined by $3,000 or 0.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in the prior year. The rate of the borrowings declined to 4.65% from 4.77% for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Offsetting the reduction in the cost of these funds was an increase in the average balance of borrowed funds of $558,000, or 1.8%, to $32.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $31.6 million for the same period in the prior year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, interest incurred on borrowed funds decreased by $13,000, or 1.7%, compared to the same period in the prior year. This decline was due to a decrease in the average balance of borrowing. The average balance of borrowed funds declined by $818,000, or 2.5%, to $32.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $33.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Provision for loan losses. The provision for loan losses represents the charge to income necessary to adjust the allowance for loan losses to an amount that represents management’s assessment of the estimated probable incurred credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Each quarter management performs a review of estimated probable credit losses in the loan portfolio. Based on this review, a provision for loan losses of $690,000 was recorded for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 compared to $260,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The year-to-date provision for loan losses increased $715,000 or 172.7% compared to the first half of 2009. The provision for loan losses was higher for the current quarter and year-to-date due to increases in net charge-offs, increases in nonperforming and delinquent loans and the continued distressed state of the economy. Nonperforming loans were $20.1 million, or 5.5% of total loans at June 30, 2010 compared with $14.0 million, or 4.2% at June 30, 2009. Net charge-offs were $135,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and $232,000 year-to-date compared with $212,000 and $303,000 for the same periods ended June 30, 2009. Total loans were $364.8 million at June 30, 2010 compared with $321.6 million at June 30, 2009.
Non-interest income. Non-interest income increased $49,000, or 7.7%, and $34,000, or 2.7%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2009. This increase is primarily a result of rental income on other real estate owned of $16,000 and $27,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Additionally the Company recognized a net gain on the sale of investment securities of $18,000 for the quarter and $27,000 year-to-date.
Non-interest expense. Non-interest expense of $3.8 million for the second quarter of 2010 was 15.9%, or $525,000, higher than the second quarter of 2009. The increase in salaries and employee benefits of $176,000 is primarily attributable to the growth of the Company and a 10% increase in employee health insurance premiums. The Company changed data processors in April 2010 and upgraded its computer network. These improvements have resulted in an increase of $54,000 in equipment expense when compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Professional fees increased $56,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 when compared to the same period in the prior year. Other expenses grew $377,000 over the 2009 quarter. Expenses related to delinquent loans, foreclosures and other real estate owned totaled $305,000 or 80.1% of the increase. Included in this total is the Company’s non-bank asset resolution subsidiary EMORECO which had $158,000 in loan and other real estate owned expenses as of the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

 

19


Table of Contents

The year-to-date non-interest expense total of $7.4 million was 17.3%, or $1.1 million, higher than the same period of 2009. The increase in salaries and employee benefits of $316,000 is attributable to the growth of the Company and a 10% increase in employee health insurance premiums. The Company changed data processors in April 2010 and upgraded its computer network. These improvements have resulted in an increase of $129,000 in equipment expense when compared to June 30, 2009. Professional fees increased $95,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 when compared to the same period in the prior year. Losses on the sale of other real estate owned totaled $214,000, an increase of $159,000 or 289.1% over the comparable period in 2009. Other expenses grew $452,000 or 39.5%, over the first half of 2009. Expenses related to delinquent loans, foreclosures and other real estate owned totaled $372,000 or 82.3% of the increase. Included in this total is the Company’s non-bank asset resolution subsidiary EMORECO which had $288,000 in loan and other real estate owned expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Provision for income taxes. The Company recognized $60,000 in income tax expense, which reflected an effective tax rate of 4.2% for the six months, ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $67,000 with an effective tax rate of 6.0% for the respective 2009 period. The decline in the tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2010 can be associated with an increase in non-taxable income from obligations of states and political subdivisions of $339,000 or 37.7% for the six months ended when compared to the same period in the prior year.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The Company’s critical accounting estimates involving the more significant judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2010, have remained unchanged from December 31, 2009.
Average Balance Sheet and Yield/Rate Analysis. The following tables sets forth, for the periods indicated, information concerning the total dollar amounts of interest income from interest-earning assets and the resultant average yields, the total dollar amounts of interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and the resultant average costs, net interest income, interest rate spread and the net interest margin earned on average interest-earning assets. For purposes of this table, average balances are calculated using monthly averages and the average loan balances include non-accrual loans and exclude the allowance for loan losses, and interest income includes accretion of net deferred loan fees. Interest and yields on tax-exempt securities (tax-exempt for federal income tax purposes) are shown on a fully tax equivalent basis utilizing a federal tax rate of 34%. Yields and rates have been calculated on an annualized basis utilizing monthly interest amounts.
Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income. The following tables analyze the changes in interest income and interest expense, between the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, in terms of: (1) changes in volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and (2) changes in yields and rates. The table reflects the extent to which changes in the Company’s interest income and interest expense are attributable to changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior period volume), changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior period rate) and changes attributable to the combined impact of volume/rate (change in rate multiplied by change in volume). The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume/rate are allocated on a consistent basis between the volume and rate variances. Changes in interest income on securities reflects the changes in interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis.

 

20


Table of Contents

                                                 
    For the Three Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
    Average             Average     Average             Average  
(Dollars in thousands)   Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost     Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost  
 
                                               
Interest-earning assets:
                                               
Loans receivable
  $ 361,708     $ 5,299       5.88 %   $ 329,124     $ 4,906       5.98 %
Investments securities (3)
    173,264       1,986       5.37 %     103,752       1,378       6.23 %
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
    30,178       47       0.62 %     7,493       21       1.12 %
 
                                   
Total interest-earning assets
    565,150       7,332       5.44 %     440,369       6,305       5.96 %
 
                                       
Noninterest-earning assets
    38,750                       36,177                  
Total assets
  $ 603,900                     $ 476,547                  
 
                                           
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                               
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    41,067       100       0.98 %     31,315       76       0.97 %
Money market deposits
    65,017       229       1.41 %     33,097       170       2.06 %
Savings deposits
    126,228       395       1.25 %     83,310       336       1.62 %
Certificates of deposit
    248,704       1,649       2.66 %     216,641       1,977       3.66 %
Borrowings
    32,163       373       4.65 %     31,606       376       4.77 %
 
                                   
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    513,179       2,746       2.15 %     395,968       2,935       2.97 %
 
                                       
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
                                               
Other liabilities
    52,389                       45,359                  
Stockholders’ equity
    38,332                       35,220                  
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 603,900                     $ 476,547                  
 
                                           
Net interest income
          $ 4,586                     $ 3,370          
 
                                           
Interest rate spread (1)
                    3.29 %                     2.98 %
Net interest margin (2)
                    3.49 %                     3.28 %
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
                    110.13 %                     111.21 %
 
     
(1)   Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities
 
(2)   Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
 
(3)   Tax equivalent adjustments to interest incomefor tax-exempt securities was $333 and $234 for 2010 and 2009 respectively.

 

21


Table of Contents

                         
    2010 versus 2009  
    Increase (decrease) due to  
(Dollars in thousands)   Volume     Rate     Total  
 
                       
Interest-earning assets:
                       
Loans receivable
  $ 486     $ (93 )   $ 393  
Investments securities
    1,080       (472 )     608  
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
    64       (38 )     26  
 
                 
Total interest-earning assets
    1,630       (603 )     1,027  
 
                       
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                       
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    24       0       24  
Money market deposits
    164       (105 )     59  
Savings deposits
    173       (114 )     59  
Certificates of deposit
    293       (621 )     (328 )
Borrowings
    7       (9 )     (2 )
 
                 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    661       (849 )     (188 )
 
                       
Net interest income
  $ 969     $ 246     $ 1,215  
 
                 

 

22


Table of Contents

                                                 
    For the Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
    Average             Average     Average             Average  
    Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost     Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost  
    (Dollars in thousands)           (Dollars in thousands)        
Interest-earning assets:
                                               
Loans receivable
  $ 358,989     $ 10,396       5.84 %   $ 326,223     $ 9,904       6.12 %
Investments securities (3)
    162,595       3,781       5.48 %     104,362       2,677       6.07 %
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
    30,100       79       0.53 %     9,030       47       1.05 %
 
                                   
Total interest-earning assets
    551,683       14,256       5.44 %     439,616       12,629       6.01 %
 
                                       
Noninterest-earning assets
    38,448                       34,167                  
Total assets
  $ 590,132                     $ 473,783                  
 
                                           
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                               
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    39,977       195       0.98 %     29,519       137       0.94 %
Money market deposits
    62,767       508       1.63 %     30,947       321       2.09 %
Savings deposits
    119,946       822       1.38 %     77,358       582       1.52 %
Certificates of deposit
    248,134       3,333       2.71 %     221,374       4,235       3.86 %
Borrowings
    32,245       757       4.73 %     33,063       770       4.70 %
 
                                   
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    503,068       5,615       2.25 %     392,260       6,045       3.11 %
 
                                       
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
                                               
Other liabilities
    49,364                       46,303                  
Stockholders’ equity
    37,699                       35,220                  
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 590,132                     $ 473,783                  
 
                                           
Net interest income
          $ 8,641                     $ 6,584          
 
                                           
Interest rate spread (1)
                    3.19 %                     2.90 %
Net interest margin (2)
                    3.39 %                     3.22 %
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
                    109.66 %                     112.07 %
 
     
(1)   Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities
 
(2)   Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
 
(3)   Tax equivalent adjustments to interest income for tax-exempt securities was $638 and $464 for 2010 and 2009 respectively.

 

23


Table of Contents

                         
    2010 versus 2009  
    Increase (decrease) due to  
(Dollars in thousands)   Volume     Rate     Total  
 
                       
Interest-earning assets:
                       
Loans receivable
  $ 1,000     $ (508 )   $ 492  
Investments securities
    1,762       (658 )     1,104  
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
    110       (78 )     32  
 
                 
Total interest-earning assets
    2,872       (1,244 )     1,628  
 
                       
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                       
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    49       9       58  
Money market deposits
    332       (145 )     187  
Savings deposits
    322       (82 )     240  
Certificates of deposit
    515       (1,417 )     (902 )
Borrowings
    (19 )     7       (12 )
 
                 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,199       (1,628 )     (429 )
 
                       
Net interest income
  $ 1,673     $ 384     $ 2,057  
 
                 
LIQUIDITY
Management’s objective in managing liquidity is maintaining the ability to continue meeting the cash flow needs of its customers, such as borrowings or deposit withdrawals, as well as its own financial commitments. The principal sources of liquidity are net income, loan payments, maturing and principal reductions on securities and sales of securities available for sale, federal funds sold and cash and deposits with banks. Along with its liquid assets, the Company has additional sources of liquidity available to ensure that adequate funds are available as needed. These include, but are not limited to, the purchase of federal funds, the ability to borrow funds under line of credit agreements with correspondent banks, a borrowing agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio and the adjustment of interest rates to obtain depositors. Management feels that it has the capital adequacy, profitability and reputation to meet the current and projected needs of its customers.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities consisted mainly of depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment, the provision for loan losses, net amortization of securities and net changes in other assets and liabilities. Cash and cash equivalents decreased primarily as a result of the purchasing of investment securities and funding new loans. This decrease was largely offset by an increase in deposits. For a more detailed illustration of sources and uses of cash, refer to the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
INFLATION
Substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities relate to banking activities and are monetary in nature. The consolidated financial statements and related financial data are presented in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. GAAP currently requires the Company to measure the financial position and results of operations in terms of historical dollars, with the exception of securities available for sale, impaired loans and other real estate loans that are measured at fair value. Changes in the value of money due to rising inflation can cause purchasing power loss.
Management’s opinion is that movements in interest rates affect the financial condition and results of operations to a greater degree than changes in the rate of inflation. It should be noted that interest rates and inflation do affect each other, but do not always move in correlation with each other. The Company’s ability to match the interest sensitivity of its financial assets to the interest sensitivity of its liabilities in its asset/liability management may tend to minimize the effect of changes in interest rates on the Company’s performance.

 

24


Table of Contents

REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company is subject to the regulatory requirements of The Federal Reserve System as a multi-bank holding company. The affiliate banks are subject to regulations of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the State of Ohio, Division of Financial Institutions.
Effective February 11, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company’s subsidiary, EB, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with the FDIC and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions as a result of the joint examination by the FDIC and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions completed in the fourth quarter of 2009. The MOU sets forth certain actions required to be taken by management of EB to rectify unsatisfactory conditions identified by the federal and state banking regulators that relate to EB’s concentration of credit for non-owner occupied 1-4 family residential mortgage loans. The MOU requires EB to reduce delinquent and classified loans and enhance credit administration for non-owner occupied residential real estate; to develop specific plans for the reduction of borrower indebtedness on classified and delinquent credits; to correct violations of laws and regulations listed in the joint examination report; to implement an earnings improvement plan; to maintain specified capital discussed below; to submit to the FDIC and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions for review and comment a revised methodology for calculating and determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; and to provide 30 days’ advance notification of proposed dividend payments.
Compliance with the terms of the MOU is a high priority for the Company. In anticipation of the requirements that would be imposed by the MOU executed February 11, 2010, management devoted significant resources to the preceding matters during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and intends to continue to do so during 2010. Specific actions taken included the evaluation and reorganization of lending and credit administration personnel, retention of collection and workout personnel, and the sale of $4.6 million of nonperforming assets to a sister, nonbank-asset resolution subsidiary established late in the fourth quarter of 2009. In 2009, the Company invested $1.25 million in EB in the form of capital infusions to maintain Tier I capital at the level expected by the FDIC and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions.
The MOU requires that EB submit plans and report to the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions and the FDIC regarding EB’s loan portfolio and profit plan, among other matters. The MOU also requires that the Bank maintain its Tier I Leverage Capital ratio at not less than 9 percent.
The following table sets forth the capital requirements for EB under the FDIC regulations and EB’s capital ratios at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
FDIC Regulations
                                 
    Adequately     Well              
Capital Ratio   Capitalized     Capitalized     June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
 
                               
Tier I Leverage Capital
    4.00 %     5.00 %(1)     9.27 %     10.29 %
Risk-Based Capital:
                               
Tier I
    4.00       6.00       13.16       13.63  
Total
    8.00       10.00       14.45       14.91  
     
(1)   9 percent required by the MOU.
REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Company is subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors and the regulators can lower classifications in certain cases. Failure to meet various capital requirements can trigger regulatory action that could have a direct material effect on the Company’s operations.
The prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications, including well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion and plans for capital restoration are required.

 

25


Table of Contents

The following table illustrates the Company’s risk-weighted capital ratios at June 30, 2010:
                                                 
    Middlefield Banc Corp.     The Middlefield Banking Co.     Emerald Bank  
    June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2010     2010  
(Dollar amounts in thousands)   Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio  
 
                                               
Total Capital
(to Risk-weighted Assets)
                                               
 
                                               
Actual
  $ 44,685       11.87 %   $ 36,462       11.30 %   $ 7,039       14.45 %
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
    30,109       8.00       25,825       8.00       3,898       8.00  
To Be Well Capitalized
    37,636       10.00       32,281       10.00       4,872       10.00  
 
                                               
Tier I Capital
(to Risk-weighted Assets)
                                               
 
                                               
Actual
  $ 39,967       10.62 %   $ 32,606       10.10 %   $ 6,413       13.16 %
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
    15,054       4.00       12,912       4.00       1,949       4.00  
To Be Well Capitalized
    22,582       6.00       19,368       6.00       2,923       6.00  
 
                                               
Tier I Capital
(to Average Assets)
                                               
 
                                               
Actual
  $ 39,967       6.88 %   $ 32,606       6.46 %   $ 6,413       9.27 %
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
    23,235       4.00       20,200       4.00       2,768       4.00  
To Be Well Capitalized
    29,044       5.00       25,251       5.00       3,460       5.00  
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
The primary objective of the Company’s asset and liability management function is to maximize the Company’s net interest income while simultaneously maintaining an acceptable level of interest rate risk given the Company’s operating environment, capital and liquidity requirements, performance objectives and overall business focus. The principal determinant of the exposure of the Company’s earnings to interest rate risk is the timing difference between the repricing and maturity of interest-earning assets and the repricing or maturity of its interest-bearing liabilities. The Company’s asset and liability management policies are designed to decrease interest rate sensitivity primarily by shortening the maturities of interest-earning assets while at the same time extending the maturities of interest-bearing liabilities. The Board of Directors of the Company continues to believe in strong asset/liability management in order to insulate the Company from material losses as a result of prolonged increases in interest rates. As a result of this policy, the Company emphasizes a larger, more diversified portfolio of residential mortgage loans in the form of mortgage-backed securities. Mortgage-backed securities generally increase the quality of the Company’s assets by virtue of the insurance or guarantees that back them, are more liquid than individual mortgage loans and may be used to collateralize borrowings or other obligations of the Company.
The Company’s Board of Directors has established an Asset and Liability Management Committee consisting of four outside directors, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President/ Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President /Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President/Commercial Lending. This committee, which meets quarterly, generally monitors various asset and liability management policies and strategies, which were implemented by the Company over the past few years. These strategies have included: (i) an emphasis on the investment in adjustable-rate and shorter duration mortgage-backed securities; (ii) an emphasis on the origination of single-family residential adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs), residential construction loans and commercial real estate loans, which generally have adjustable or floating interest rates and/or shorter maturities than traditional single-family residential loans, and consumer loans, which generally have shorter terms and higher interest rates than mortgage loans; (iii) increase in the duration of the liability base of the Company by extending the maturities of savings deposits, borrowed funds and repurchase agreements.
The Company has established the following guidelines for assessing interest rate risk:
Net interest income simulation. Given a 200 basis point parallel and gradual increase or decrease in market interest rates, net interest income may not change by more than 10% for a one-year period.

 

26


Table of Contents

Portfolio equity simulation. Portfolio equity is the net present value of the Company’s existing assets and liabilities. Given a 200 basis point immediate and permanent increase or decrease in market interest rates, portfolio equity may not correspondingly decrease or increase by more than 20% of stockholders’ equity.
The following table presents the simulated impact of a 200 basis point upward and a 200 basis point downward shift of market interest rates on net interest income and the change in portfolio equity. This analysis was done assuming that the interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability levels at June 30, 2010 remained constant. The impact of the market rate movements was developed by simulating the effects of rates changing gradually over a one-year period from the June 30, 2010 levels for net interest income. The impact of market rate movements was developed by simulating the effects of an immediate and permanent change in rates at June 30, 2010 for portfolio equity:
                 
    Increase     Decrease  
    200 Basis Points     200 Basis Points  
 
               
Net interest income — increase (decrease)
    (2.15 )%     4.21 %
 
               
Portfolio equity — increase (decrease)
    (12.30 )%     (10.19 )%
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Controls and Procedures Disclosure
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(e) and 15d-14(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are, to the best of their knowledge, effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Subsequent to the date of their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that there were no significant changes in internal control or in other factors that could significantly affect its internal controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
A material weakness is a significant deficiency (as defined in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 2), or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in there being more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None

 

27


Table of Contents

Item 1a. There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s business.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults by the Company on its senior securities
None
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5. Other information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit list for Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the Period Ended June 30, 2010
         
exhibit        
number   description   location
3.1
  Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Middlefield Banc Corp., as amended   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005, filed on March 29, 2006
 
       
3.2
  Regulations of Middlefield Banc Corp.   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s registration statement on Form 10 filed on April 17, 2001
 
       
4.0
  Specimen stock certificate   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s registration statement on Form 10 filed on April 17, 2001
 
       
4.1
  Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2006, between Middlefield Banc Corp., as Depositor, Wilmington Trust Company, as Property trustee, Wilmington Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee, and Administrative Trustees   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on December 27, 2006
 
       
4.2
  Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of December 21, 2006, between Middlefield Banc Corp. and Wilmington Trust Company   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on December 27, 2006
 
       
4.3
  Guarantee Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2006, between Middlefield Banc Corp. and Wilmington Trust Company   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on December 27, 2006
 
       
10.1.0*
  1999 Stock Option Plan of Middlefield Banc Corp.   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s registration statement on Form 10 filed on April 17, 2001

 

28


Table of Contents

         
exhibit        
number   description   location
 
       
10.1.1*
  2007 Omnibus Equity Plan   Incorporated by reference to Middlefield Banc Corp.’s definitive proxy statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Appendix A, filed on April 7, 2008
 
       
10.2*
  Severance Agreement between Middlefield Banc Corp. and Thomas G. Caldwell, dated January 7, 2008   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.3*
  Severance Agreement between Middlefield Banc Corp. and James R. Heslop, II, dated January 7, 2008   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.4.0*
  Severance Agreement between Middlefield Banc Corp. and Jay P. Giles, dated January 7, 2008   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.4.1*
  Severance Agreement between Middlefield Banc Corp. and Teresa M. Hetrick, dated January 7, 2008   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.1 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.4.2*
  Severance Agreement between Middlefield Banc Corp. and Jack L. Lester, dated January 7, 2008   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.2 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.4.3*
  Severance Agreement between Middlefield Banc Corp. and Donald L. Stacy, dated January 7, 2008   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.3 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.4.4*
  Severance Agreement between Middlefield Banc Corp. and Alfred F. Thompson Jr., dated January 7, 2008   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.4 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.5
  Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati Agreement for Advances and Security Agreement dated September 14, 2000   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s registration statement on Form 10 filed on April 17, 2001
 
       
10.6*
  Amended Director Retirement Agreement with Richard T. Coyne   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.7*
  Amended Director Retirement Agreement with Frances H. Frank   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.8*
  Amended Director Retirement Agreement with Thomas C. Halstead   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.9*
  Director Retirement Agreement with George F. Hasman   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2001, filed on March 28, 2002
 
       
10.10*
  Director Retirement Agreement with Donald D. Hunter   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2001, filed on March 28, 2002

 

29


Table of Contents

         
exhibit        
number   description   location
 
       
10.11*
  Director Retirement Agreement with Martin S. Paul   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2001, filed on March 28, 2002
 
       
10.12*
  Amended Director Retirement Agreement with Donald E. Villers   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on January 9, 2008
 
       
10.13*
  Executive Survivor Income Agreement (aka DBO agreement [death benefit only]) with Donald L. Stacy   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004
 
       
10.14*
  DBO Agreement with Jay P. Giles   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004
 
       
10.15*
  DBO Agreement with Alfred F. Thompson Jr.   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004
 
       
10.16*
  Reserved    
 
       
10.17*
  DBO Agreement with Theresa M. Hetrick   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004
 
       
10.18*
  DBO Agreement with Jack L. Lester   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004
 
       
10.19*
  DBO Agreement with James R. Heslop, II   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004
 
       
10.20*
  DBO Agreement with Thomas G. Caldwell   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004
 
       
10.21*
  Form of Indemnification Agreement with directors of Middlefield Banc Corp. and with executive officers of Middlefield Banc Corp. and The Middlefield Banking Company   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s registration statement on Form 10, Amendment No. 1, filed on June 14, 2001
 
       
10.22*
  Annual Incentive Plan Summary   Incorporated by reference to the summary description of the annual incentive plan included as Exhibit 10.22 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on December 16, 2005

 

30


Table of Contents

         
exhibit        
number   description   location
 
       
10.23*
  Amended Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement with Thomas G. Caldwell   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on May 9, 2008
 
       
10.24*
  Amended Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement with James R. Heslop, II   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on May 9, 2008
 
       
10.25*
  Amended Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement with Donald L. Stacy   Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed on May 9, 2008
 
       
31.1
  Rule 13a-14(a) certification of Chief Executive Officer   filed herewith
 
       
31.2
  Rule 13a-14(a) certification of Chief Financial Officer   filed herewith
 
       
32
  Rule 13a-14(b) certification   filed herewith
 
       
99
  Report of independent registered public accounting firm   filed herewith
     
*   management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

 

31


Table of Contents

(MBC LOGO)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned and hereunto duly authorized.
         
  MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
 
 
Date: August 12, 2010  By:   /s/ Thomas G. Caldwell    
    Thomas G. Caldwell   
    President and Chief Executive Officer   
 
     
Date: August 12, 2010  By:   /s/ Donald L. Stacy    
    Donald L. Stacy   
    Principal Financial and Accounting Officer   
 

 

32