MILLER INDUSTRIES INC /TN/ - Quarter Report: 2007 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
_______________
FORM
10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended September 30,
2007
o |
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from _____________________ to
_____________________
Commission
file number 1-14124
MILLER
INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Tennessee
|
62-1566286
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
8503
Hilltop Drive
Ooltewah,
Tennessee
|
37363
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(423)
238-4171
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Not
Applicable
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x Yes
|
o No
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
Accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated
Filer x
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o
Yes
|
x
No.
|
The
number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.01
per share, as of October 31, 2007 was 11,588,179.
Index
PART
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
Page
Number
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006
|
3
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006
|
4
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006
|
5
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
11
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
16
|
PART
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
17
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
17
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
17
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
17
|
SIGNATURES
|
18
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain
statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to Item 2, “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” may
be deemed to be forward-looking statements, as defined in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are
made based on our management’s belief, as well as assumptions made by, and
information currently available to, our management, pursuant to “safe harbor”
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Our actual results may differ materially from the results
anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to, among other things,
the
risks related to the cyclical nature of our industry, general economic
conditions and the economic health of our customers, our dependence on outside
suppliers of raw materials, increases in the cost of aluminum, steel,
petroleum-related products and other raw materials, increases in fuel and
other
transportation costs, and those other risks referenced herein, including
those
risks referred to in this report, in Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” and those
risks discussed in our other filings with the SEC, including those risks
discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for fiscal 2006,
which discussion is incorporated herein by this reference. Such
factors are not exclusive. We do not undertake to update any
forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by, or on behalf
of, our company.
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
MILLER
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except share data)
September
30, 2007
(Unaudited)
|
December
31, 2006
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
and temporary investments
|
$ |
11,304
|
$ |
8,204
|
||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,630 and
$2,488 at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively
|
76,569
|
84,186
|
||||||
Inventories,
net
|
36,416
|
43,155
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
2,212
|
2,079
|
||||||
Current
deferred income taxes
|
10,154
|
12,154
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
136,655
|
149,778
|
||||||
PROPERTY,
PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
32,885
|
27,527
|
||||||
GOODWILL
|
11,619
|
11,619
|
||||||
DEFERRED
INCOME TAXES
|
3,457
|
7,586
|
||||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
548
|
922
|
||||||
$ |
185,164
|
$ |
197,432
|
|||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Current
portion of long-term obligations
|
$ |
1,602
|
$ |
1,623
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
37,532
|
58,620
|
||||||
Accrued
liabilities and other
|
12,952
|
13,269
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
52,086
|
73,512
|
||||||
LONG-TERM
OBLIGATIONS, less current portion
|
4,319
|
10,537
|
||||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 5 and 8)
|
||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
or
outstanding
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 11,588,179
and
11,509,964 outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006, respectively
|
116
|
115
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
160,623
|
159,702
|
||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(34,673 | ) | (48,539 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
2,693
|
2,105
|
||||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
128,759
|
113,383
|
||||||
$ |
185,164
|
$ |
197,432
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
3
MILLER
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In
thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
NET
SALES
|
$ |
92,692
|
$ |
107,364
|
$ |
315,520
|
$ |
292,723
|
||||||||
COSTS
AND EXPENSES:
|
||||||||||||||||
Costs
of operations
|
79,637
|
92,228
|
270,485
|
249,582
|
||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
6,481
|
6,632
|
20,671
|
19,615
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
1,018
|
851
|
2,612
|
2,653
|
||||||||||||
Total
costs and expenses
|
87,136
|
99,711
|
293,768
|
271,850
|
||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
5,556
|
7,653
|
21,752
|
20,873
|
||||||||||||
INCOME
TAX PROVISION
|
1,958
|
967
|
7,886
|
2,761
|
||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ |
3,598
|
$ |
6,686
|
$ |
13,866
|
$ |
18,112
|
||||||||
BASIC
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
|
$ |
0.31
|
$ |
0.59
|
$ |
1.20
|
$ |
1.60
|
||||||||
DILUTED
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
|
$ |
0.31
|
$ |
0.58
|
$ |
1.19
|
$ |
1.56
|
||||||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
11,572
|
11,360
|
11,545
|
11,334
|
||||||||||||
Diluted
|
11,667
|
11,577
|
11,661
|
11,589
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
4
MILLER
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
13,866
|
$ |
18,112
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,127
|
2,119
|
||||||
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
92
|
92
|
||||||
Deferred
income tax provision
|
6,134
|
—
|
||||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
225
|
771
|
||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
231
|
231
|
||||||
Issuance
of non-employee director shares
|
75
|
75
|
||||||
Gain
on disposals of property, plant and equipment
|
(109 | ) |
—
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
7,600
|
(13,391 | ) | |||||
Inventories
|
7,211
|
(7,227 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
(107 | ) | (1,501 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
(21,462 | ) |
6,771
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities and other
|
(398 | ) |
208
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
15,485
|
6,260
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities from discontinued
operations
|
—
|
658
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
15,485
|
6,918
|
||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
(7,401 | ) | (6,689 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
143
|
91
|
||||||
Payments
received on notes receivables
|
391
|
171
|
||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities from continuing
operations
|
(6,867 | ) | (6,427 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities from discontinued
operations
|
—
|
25
|
||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(6,867 | ) | (6,402 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
borrowings under senior credit facility
|
—
|
3,000
|
||||||
Payments
under subordinated credit facility
|
(5,000 | ) | (5,000 | ) | ||||
Payments
on long-term obligations
|
(1,324 | ) | (1,202 | ) | ||||
Borrowings
under long-term obligations
|
—
|
168
|
||||||
Additions
to deferred financing costs
|
(42 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from the exercise of stock options
|
617
|
484
|
||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities from continuing
operations
|
(5,749 | ) | (2,554 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in financing activities from discontinued
operations
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(5,749 | ) | (2,554 | ) | ||||
EFFECT
OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND TEMPORARY
INVESTMENTS
|
231
|
520
|
||||||
NET
CHANGE IN CASH AND TEMPORARY INVESTMENTS
|
3,100
|
(1,518 | ) | |||||
CASH
AND TEMPORARY INVESTMENTS, beginning of period
|
8,204
|
6,147
|
||||||
CASH
AND TEMPORARY INVESTMENTS-DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, beginning of
period
|
—
|
23
|
||||||
CASH
AND TEMPORARY INVESTMENTS-DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, end of
period
|
—
|
102
|
||||||
CASH
AND TEMPORARY INVESTMENTS, end of period
|
$ |
11,304
|
$ |
4,550
|
||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
payments for interest
|
$ |
3,233
|
$ |
2,866
|
||||
Cash
payments for income taxes
|
$ |
2,157
|
$ |
3,044
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
5
MILLER
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
The
condensed consolidated financial statements of Miller Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) included herein have been prepared by the Company
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations. Nevertheless, the Company believes that the disclosures
are adequate to make the financial information presented not
misleading. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which
are
of a normal recurring nature, to present fairly the Company’s financial
position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods
presented. Cost of goods sold for interim periods for certain
entities is determined based on estimated gross profit rates. Interim
results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected
for the fiscal year. These condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
2. BASIC
AND DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE
Basic
income per share is computed by dividing income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding. Diluted income per share is calculated
by dividing income by the weighted average number of common and potential
dilutive common shares outstanding. Diluted income per share takes
into consideration the assumed conversion of outstanding stock options resulting
in approximately 95,000 and 217,000 potential dilutive common shares for
the
three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and 116,000
and 254,000 potential dilutive common shares for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Options to purchase
approximately 35,000 and 103,000 shares of common stock were outstanding
during
the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, but were
not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
effect
would have been anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September
30, 2007 and 2006, options to purchase approximately 35,000 and 61,000 were
outstanding during the related period but were not included in the computation
of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
3. INVENTORIES
Inventory
costs include materials, labor and factory overhead. Inventories are
stated at the lower of cost or market, determined on a first-in, first-out
basis.
Inventories
at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consisted of the following
(in thousands):
September 30,
2007
|
December 31,
2006
|
|||||||
Chassis
|
$ |
2,378
|
$ |
3,596
|
||||
Raw
materials
|
17,055
|
18,767
|
||||||
Work
in process
|
12,284
|
12,566
|
||||||
Finished
goods
|
4,699
|
8,226
|
||||||
$ |
36,416
|
$ |
43,155
|
4. LONG-LIVED
ASSETS
The
Company periodically reviews the carrying amount of its long-lived assets
and
goodwill to determine if those assets may be recoverable based upon the future
operating cash flows expected to be generated by those
assets. Management believes that its long-lived assets are
appropriately valued.
6
5. LONG-TERM
OBLIGATIONS
Long-term
obligations consisted of the following at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
September 30,
2007
|
December 31,
2006
|
|||||||
Outstanding
borrowings under Senior Credit Facility
|
$ |
3,850
|
$ |
4,900
|
||||
Outstanding
borrowings under Junior Credit Facility
|
—
|
5,000
|
||||||
Mortgage,
equipment and other notes payable
|
2,071
|
2,260
|
||||||
5,921
|
12,160
|
|||||||
Less
current portion
|
(1,602 | ) | (1,623 | ) | ||||
$ |
4,319
|
$ |
10,537
|
Certain
equipment and manufacturing facilities are pledged as collateral under the
mortgage and equipment notes payable.
Credit
Facilities
Senior
Credit Facility. The Company is party to a Credit Agreement (the
“Senior Credit Agreement”) with Wachovia Bank, National Association, for a $27.0
million senior secured credit facility (the “Senior Credit
Facility”). The Senior Credit Facility consists of a $20.0 million
revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”), and a $7.0 million term loan (the
“Term Loan”). The Senior Credit Facility is secured by substantially
all of the Company’s assets, and contains customary representations and
warranties, events of default and affirmative and negative covenants for
secured
facilities of this type. On July 11, 2007, the Company and
Wachovia agreed to certain amendments to the Senior Credit Agreement which
are
described below.
Formerly,
in the absence of a default, all borrowings under the Revolver bore interest
at
the LIBOR Market Index Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Agreement) plus
a
margin of between 1.75% to 2.50% per annum that was subject to adjustment
from
time to time based upon the Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the
Senior Credit Agreement), and the Term Loan bore interest at a 30-day adjusted
LIBOR rate plus a margin of between 1.75% to 2.50% per annum that was subject
to
adjustment from time to time based upon the Consolidated Leverage
Ratio. The Revolver was scheduled to expire on June 15, 2008,
and the Term Loan was scheduled to mature on June 15, 2010.
Under
the
amended Senior Credit Agreement, the non-default rate of interest under the
Revolver and Term Loan was reduced to the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus a
margin
of between 0.75% to 1.50% per annum that is subject to adjustment from time
to
time based upon the Consolidated Leverage Ratio, and the maturity date of
the
Revolver was extended to June 17, 2010. The amendments also increased
the ratio of leverage permitted under the Consolidated Leverage Ratio covenant,
and extended and modified certain of the negative covenants and events of
default set forth in the Senior Credit Agreement.
At
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had no
outstanding borrowings under the Revolver.
Junior
Credit Facility. In May 2006, the Company repaid $5.0 million of
subordinated debt under its junior credit facility with William G. Miller,
the
Company’s Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer (the “Junior
Credit Facility”), and in May 2007, the Company repaid the remaining $5.0
million principal balance under the Junior Credit Facility. With such
payments, all loans from Mr. Miller to the Company were paid in
full. In July 2007, in connection with the amendments to the
Company’s Senior Credit Agreement, the Junior Credit Facility was
terminated.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity. Because of the amount of obligations
outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility and the connection of the interest
rate under the Senior Credit Facility (including the default rates) to the
LIBOR
rate, an increase in the LIBOR rate could have an effect on the Company’s
ability to satisfy its obligations under the Senior Credit Facility and increase
its interest expense. Therefore, the Company’s liquidity and access
to capital resources could be further affected by increasing interest
rates.
7
Future
maturities of long-term obligations at September 30, 2007 are as follows
(in thousands):
2008
|
$ |
1,602
|
||
2009
|
1,600
|
|||
2010
|
2,708
|
|||
2011
|
11
|
|||
$ |
5,921
|
6. RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In
May
2006, the Company repaid $5.0 million of subordinated debt under the Junior
Credit Facility, and in May 2007, the Company repaid the remaining $5.0 million
principal balance under the Junior Credit Facility. These payments
were approved by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and by
the full Board of Directors with Mr. Miller abstaining due to his personal
interest in the transactions. With such payments, all loans from Mr.
Miller to the Company were paid in full. In July 2007, in connection
with the amendments to the Company’s Senior Credit Agreement, the Junior Credit
Facility was terminated.
The
Company paid approximately $0 and $115,000 in interest expense on the Junior
Credit Facility for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006; and
$228,000 and $570,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively. Additionally, approximately $39,000 is included
in accrued liabilities for unpaid interest on the Junior Credit Facility
at
December 31, 2006.
7. STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” using the modified
prospective transition method. This statement requires the
determination of the fair-value of stock-based compensation at the grant
date
and the recognition of the related expense over the period in which the
stock-based compensation vests. For the three months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded $77,000 in compensation
expense related to its stock-based compensation. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, $231,000 was recorded for stock-based
compensation. The stock-based compensation expense is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of income.
Prior
to
the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company accounted for stock-based
compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Bulletin (APB) No.
25,
“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Under the provisions of
APB No. 25, no compensation expense is recorded when the terms of the grant
are
fixed and the option exercise prices are equal to the market value of the
common
stock on the date of the grant. Disclosure-only provisions of SFAS
No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” were adopted.
The
Company did not issue any stock options during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. As of September 30, 2007, the Company
had $154,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options,
with
$77,000 to be expensed during the remainder of 2007, and $77,000 to be expensed
in 2008. The Company issued approximately 75,000 shares of common
stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from the exercise of
stock
options. For additional disclosures related to the Company’s
stock-based compensation refer to Notes 2 and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
8
8. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
The
Company has entered into arrangements with third-party lenders where it has
agreed, in the event of default by a customer, to repurchase from the
third-party lender Company products repossessed from the
customer. These arrangements are typically subject to a maximum
repurchase amount. The Company’s risk under these arrangements is
mitigated by the value of the products repurchased as part of the
transaction. The maximum amount of collateral that the Company could
be required to purchase was approximately $32.5 million at September 30,
2007, and $27.5 million at December 31, 2006.
At
September 30, 2007, the Company had commitments of approximately $2.6
million for construction and acquisition of property and equipment, all of
which
is expected to be incurred in the remainder of 2007.
Contingencies
The
Company is, from time to time, a party to litigation arising in the normal
course of its business. Litigation is subject to various inherent
uncertainties, and it is possible that some of these matters could be resolved
unfavorably to the Company, which could result in substantial damages against
the Company. The Company has established accruals for matters that
are probable and reasonably estimable and maintains product liability and
other
insurance that management believes to be adequate. Management
believes that any liability that may ultimately result from the resolution
of
these matters in excess of available insurance coverage and accruals will
not
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or
results
of operations of the Company.
9. INCOME
TAXES
Before
the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company maintained a valuation allowance
reflecting the Company’s recognition that cumulative losses in recent years
indicated that it was unclear whether certain future tax benefits would be
realized as a result of future taxable income. In the fourth quarter
of 2006, the Company concluded that the valuation allowance on the deferred
tax
asset was no longer necessary given the Company’s sustained income and growth
throughout the year and the favorable projected earnings outlook. A
tax benefit of $8.8 million was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2006
as a
result of the reversal of the valuation allowance.
10. COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
The
Company had comprehensive income of $3.9 million and $6.8 million for the
three
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively; and $14.5 million
and $19.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Components of the Company’s other comprehensive income
consist primarily of foreign currency translation adjustments.
11. GEOGRAPHIC
AND CUSTOMER INFORMATION
Net
sales
and long-lived assets (property, plant and equipment and goodwill and intangible
assets) by region was as follows (revenue is attributed to regions based
on the
locations of customers) (in thousands):
For
the Three Months Ended September 30,
|
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales:
|
||||||||||||||||
North
America
|
$ |
70,968
|
$ |
87,057
|
$ |
256,029
|
$ |
238,109
|
||||||||
Foreign
|
21,724
|
20,307
|
59,491
|
54,614
|
||||||||||||
$ |
92,692
|
$ |
107,364
|
$ |
315,520
|
$ |
292,723
|
9
September
30, 2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
|||||||
Long
Lived Assets:
|
||||||||
North
America
|
$ |
41,540
|
$ |
36,455
|
||||
Foreign
|
2,964
|
2,691
|
||||||
$ |
44,504
|
$ |
39,146
|
No
single
customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net sales for the three
and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
12. DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
In
2002,
the Company’s management and board of directors made the decision to divest of
its remaining towing services segment, as well as the operations of the
distribution group of the towing and recovery equipment segment. In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets,” the assets for the towing services segment and the
distribution group are considered a “disposal group” and are no longer being
depreciated.
In
October 2005, the Company’s subsidiary, RoadOne, Inc., filed for liquidation
under Chapter 7 of the federal bankruptcy laws in the Bankruptcy Court of
the
Eastern District of Tennessee and a trustee was appointed. In December 2006,
the
trustees final report was approved by the United States trustee, and the
final
decree of the court was entered on June 19, 2007. Upon RoadOne,
Inc.’s liquidation from bankruptcy, the Company recognized a pre-tax, non-cash
gain on deconsolidation of RoadOne, Inc., in the amount of
$126,000. In addition, a tax benefit of $18,244,000 was recognized in
2006 related to deductible losses from excess tax basis of advances to and
investments in certain discontinued operations.
13. RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS
No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 provides a framework for measuring fair value
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures regarding fair value measurements and the effect on
earnings. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. We are in the process of evaluating the
impact SFAS No. 157 will have on the Company’s financial
statements.
In
June
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN
48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also gives
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in
interim periods, and disclosure. FIN 48 was effective on
January 1, 2007 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued a Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
159 (SFAS 159), “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets & Financial
Liabilities – Including an Amendment of SFAS No. 115.” SFAS 159 will
create a fair value option under which an entity may irrevocably elect fair
value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial
assets and liabilities on a contract by contract basis, with changes in fair
values recognized in earnings as these changes occur. SFAS 159 will
become effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. We are currently reviewing the impact of SFAS 159 on our
financial statements and expect to complete this evaluation in
2007. We will adopt this new accounting standard on January 1,
2008.
10
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Executive
Overview
Miller
Industries, Inc. is the world’s largest manufacturer of vehicle towing and
recovery equipment, with domestic manufacturing subsidiaries in Tennessee
and
Pennsylvania, and foreign manufacturing subsidiaries in France and the United
Kingdom. We offer a broad range of equipment to meet our customers’
design, capacity and cost requirements under our Century®, Vulcan®,
Challenger®, Holmes®,
Champion®, Chevron™,
Eagle®,
Titan®, Jige™
and Boniface™ brand names.
Overall,
management focuses on a variety of key indicators to monitor our operating
and
financial performance. These indicators include measurements of
revenue, operating income, gross margin, income from operations, earnings
per
share, capital expenditures and cash flow.
We
derive
revenues primarily from product sales made through our network of domestic
and
foreign independent distributors. Our revenues are sensitive to a
variety of factors, such as demand for, and price of, our products, our
technological competitiveness, our reputation for providing quality products
and
reliable service, competition within our industry, the cost of raw materials
(including aluminum, steel and petroleum related products) and general economic
conditions.
Our
industry is cyclical in nature and the overall demand for our products and
our
resulting revenues have been affected historically by levels of consumer
confidence, interest rates, fuel costs, insurance costs, and economic conditions
in general. During the second quarter of 2007, we completed several
municipal and military orders but with only a small number of
additional orders received under those contracts during the third quarter
of 2007, our order intake has moderated. We expect this decrease to
cause net sales for the remainder of 2007 to be lower than those achieved
during
the past several quarters. We remain optimistic about our ability to
secure additional follow-on orders, but we cannot predict the success or
the
timing of any such orders under these contracts. We continue to be
concerned about general economic conditions and the effect they could have
on
the towing and recovery industry. Accordingly, we continue to take
steps to reduce our production levels and lower our costs for the remainder
of
the year in response to these uncertainties. We will continue to
monitor our cost structure to ensure that it remains in line with business
conditions.
In
addition, we have been and will continue to be affected by increases in the
prices that we pay for raw materials, particularly aluminum, steel,
petroleum-related products and other raw materials. Raw material
costs represent a substantial part of our total costs of operations, and
management expects aluminum and steel prices to remain at historically high
levels for the foreseeable future. As we determined necessary, we
implemented price increases to offset these higher costs. We also
began to develop alternatives to the components used in our production process
that incorporate these raw materials, and continued this development during
the
third quarter of 2007. We have shared several of these alternatives
with our major component part suppliers, some of whom have begun to implement
them in the production of our component parts. We continue to monitor
raw material prices and availability in order to more favorably position
the
Company in this dynamic market.
In
July
2007, we amended our Senior Credit Agreement with Wachovia to, among other
things, reduce the non-default rate of interest under the revolving and term
portions of our senior credit facility, increase the ratio of leverage permitted
under the Consolidated Leverage Ratio covenant, extend the maturity date
of the
revolver, and modify certain of the negative covenants and events of
default. Total senior debt at September 30, 2007 was $3.9
million, which represents a significant decrease in our overall indebtedness
from prior periods.
In
May
2007, we repaid the remaining $5.0 million principal balance under our junior
credit facility and with such payment, all loans under our junior credit
facility were paid in full. In July 2007, in connection with the
amendments to our Senior Credit Agreement, the junior credit facility was
terminated.
Interest
expense consists primarily of interest on bank debt, chassis purchases and
distributor floor plan financing. Despite reduced levels of bank
debt, total interest expense increased to $1.0 million in the third quarter
of
2007 from $0.9 million in the comparable year-ago period. This was
due to an increase in interest on chassis purchases, together with fairly
constant floor plan interest expense partially offset by substantially reduced
interest on bank debt. The interest on chassis purchases resulted
from increased purchases of chassis in advance of implementation of new
emissions standards for 2008 models.
11
During
2006, we reversed our deferred tax valuation allowance. As a result
of our positive earnings, the favorable projected earnings outlook as well
as
the improvements in overall financial position, we determined that it is
more
likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be
realized. Additionally, we recognized a tax benefit related to losses
from advances to and investments in certain discontinued
operations.
We
are
currently modernizing and expanding our manufacturing facilities in Ooltewah,
Tennessee and Hermitage, Pennsylvania and expect these projects to continue
through 2007. In addition, we are considering modernization and
expansion projects at our other manufacturing facilities. We believe
these modernization and expansion efforts will position us to more effectively
face the challenges of the global marketplace in the future.
Discontinued
Operations
During
2002, management and the board of directors made the decision to divest of
our
towing services segment, as well as the operations of the distribution group
of
our towing and recovery equipment segment. In accordance with SFAS
No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the
assets of the towing services segment and the distribution group were considered
a “disposal group” and were no longer depreciated. All assets and
liabilities and results of operations associated with these assets were
separately presented in the accompanying financial statements. The
analyses contained herein are of continuing operations unless otherwise
noted.
In
general, the customary operating liabilities of these disposed businesses
were
assumed by the new owners. Our subsidiaries that sold these
businesses are nevertheless subject to some continuing liabilities with respect
to their pre-sale operations, including, for example, liabilities related
to
litigation, certain trade payables, workers compensation and other insurance,
surety bonds, and real estate. Except in the case of direct
guarantees, these are not obligations of Miller Industries, Inc. and Miller
Industries, Inc. has taken and would expect to take whatever steps it deems
appropriate to protect itself from any such liabilities.
In
October 2005, RoadOne, Inc. filed for liquidation under Chapter 7 of the
federal
bankruptcy laws in the Bankruptcy Court of the Eastern District of Tennessee
and
a trustee was appointed. In December 2006, the trustees final report
was approved by the United States trustee, and the final decree of the court
was
entered on June 19, 2007. Upon RoadOne, Inc.’s liquidation from
bankruptcy, we recognized a pre tax, non-cash gain on deconsolidation of
RoadOne, Inc., in the amount of $126,000. In addition, a tax benefit
of $18,244,000 was recognized in 2006 related to deductible losses from excess
tax basis of advances to and investments in certain discontinued
operations.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require
us
to make estimates. Certain accounting policies are deemed “critical,”
as they require management’s highest degree of judgment, estimates and
assumptions. A discussion of critical accounting policies, the
judgments and uncertainties affecting their application and the likelihood
that
materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions
or
using different assumptions follows:
Accounts
receivable
We
extend
credit to customers in the normal course of business. Collections
from customers are continuously monitored and an allowance for doubtful accounts
is maintained based on historical experience and any specific customer
collection issues. While such bad debt expenses have historically
been within expectations and the allowance established, there can be no
assurance that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates
as in
the past.
12
Valuation
of long-lived assets and goodwill
Long-lived
assets and goodwill are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be fully
recoverable. When a determination has been made that the carrying
amount of long-lived assets and goodwill may not be fully recovered, the
amount
of impairment is measured by comparing an asset’s estimated fair value to its
carrying value. The determination of fair value is based on projected
future cash flows discounted at a rate determined by management or, if
available, independent appraisals or sales price negotiations. The
estimation of fair value includes significant judgment regarding assumptions
of
revenue, operating costs, interest rates, property and equipment additions
and
industry competition and general economic and business conditions among other
factors. We believe that these estimates are reasonable, however,
changes in any of these factors could affect these evaluations. Based
on these estimations, we believe that our long-lived assets are appropriately
valued.
Warranty
Reserves
We
estimate expense for product warranty claims at the time products are
sold. These estimates are established using historical information
about the nature, frequency and average cost of warranty claims. We
review trends of warranty claims and take actions to improve product quality
and
minimize warranty claims. We believe the warranty reserve is
adequate, however, actual claims incurred could differ from the original
estimates, requiring adjustments to the accrual.
Income
taxes
We
recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between
the
financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. Differences between the effective tax rate and the
expected tax rate are due primarily to losses from advances to and investments
in certain discontinued operations and changes in deferred tax asset valuation
allowances. We consider the need to record a valuation allowance to
reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to
be
realized. We consider tax loss carryforwards, reversal of deferred
tax liabilities, tax planning and estimates of future taxable income in
assessing the need for a valuation allowance.
In
the
fourth quarter of 2006, we reversed our deferred tax valuation
allowance. As a result of our positive earnings, our favorable
projected earnings outlook as well as the improvements in our overall financial
position, we determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred
tax
asset will be realized. The Company recognized a net deferred tax
asset of $18.2 million as of December 31, 2006, which includes the $8.8
million recognized as a result of the reversal of the valuation
allowance.
Revenues
Under
our
accounting policies, revenues are recorded when risk of ownership has
transferred to independent distributors or other customers, which generally
occurs on shipment. While we manufacture only the bodies of wreckers,
which are installed on truck chassis manufactured by third parties, we
frequently purchase the truck chassis for resale to our
customers. Sales of company-purchased truck chassis are included in
net sales. Margins are substantially lower on completed recovery
vehicles containing company-purchased chassis because the markup over the
cost
of the chassis is nominal.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The
functional currency for our foreign operations is the applicable local
currency. The translation from the applicable foreign currencies to
U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using current exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date, historical rates for equity and
the
weighted average exchange rate during the period for revenue and expense
accounts. The gains or losses resulting from such translations are
included in shareholders’ equity. For intercompany debt denominated
in a currency other than the functional currency, the remeasurement into
the
functional currency is also included in shareholders’ equity as the amounts are
considered to be of a long-term investment nature.
13
Results
of Operations–Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Three
Months Ended September 30, 2006
Net
sales
for the three months ended September 30, 2007 decreased 13.7% to $92.7
million from $107.4 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
decrease was attributable primarily to the small number of additional orders
received during the third quarter of 2007 under certain governmental and
military contracts for which orders were completed in 2006 and during the
first
two quarters of 2007.
Costs
of
operations for the three months ended September 30, 2007 decreased 13.7% to
$79.6 million from $92.2 million for the comparable period in 2006, which
was
attributable to lower production levels in 2007 compared to 2006 as described
above. Overall, costs of operations remained constant at
85.9%.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 decreased to $6.5 million from $6.6 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006. As a percentage of sales,
selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 7.0% for the three
months ended September 30, 2007 from 6.2% for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 due to increases in personnel-related expenses and other
expenses spread over lower sales and production volume.
The
provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006 reflects the combined effective U.S. federal, state and foreign
tax
rate of 35.2% and 12.6%, respectively.
Our
total
interest expense increased to $1.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 from $0.9 million for the comparable year-ago
period. Increases in interest expense were primarily the result of
increases in interest on chassis purchases together with distributor floor
plan
interest expense.
Results
of Operations–Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2006
Net
sales
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased 7.8% to $315.5
million from $292.7 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was attributable to increases in order levels during 2006 and in
the
first and second quarter of 2007 as a result of increased demand for our
products, offset by lower order levels and sales in the third quarter of
2007 as
described above.
Costs
of
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased 8.4% to
$270.5 million from $249.6 million for the comparable period in 2006, which
was
attributable to increases in demand and production. Overall, costs of
operations increased slightly as a percentage of sales from 85.3% to 85.7%
because of product mix as well as higher raw material costs, partially offset
by
past pricing actions.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 increased to $20.7 million from $19.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. The increase is attributable to increases in
personnel-related expenses and other expenses associated with higher sales
volume. As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased to 6.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
from 6.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
The
provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006 reflects the combined effective U.S. federal, state and foreign tax
rate of
36.3% and 13.2%, respectively.
Our
total
interest expense decreased to $2.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 from $2.7 million for the comparable year-ago
period. Decreases in interest expense were primarily the result of
lower debt levels offset by increases in interest on chassis purchases together
with distributor floor plan interest expense.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
provided by operating activities was $15.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to $6.9 million for the comparable period in
2006. The cash provided by operating activities for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 reflects strong profitability coupled with
decreases in accounts receivable and inventory and the utilization of our
deferred tax assets, partially offset by decreases in accounts payable primarily
related to the timing and terms of vendor payments.
14
Cash
used
in investing activities was $6.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to $6.4 million for the comparable period in
2006. The cash used in investing activities was for the purchase of
property, plant and equipment.
Cash
used
in financing activities was $5.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to $2.6 million for the comparable period in
the prior year. The cash used in financing activities was used to
make payments on our term loan under our senior credit facility, to repay
our
remaining subordinated debt, and to repay other outstanding long-term
debt.
Over
the
past year, we generally have used available cash flow from operations to
reduce
the outstanding balance on our credit facilities, to pay down other long-term
debt and to pay for capital expenditures related to our plant
modernization. In addition, our working capital requirements have
been and will continue to be significant in connection with shifts in product
mix to meet changes in customer demand.
We
are
modernizing and expanding our manufacturing facilities in Ooltewah, Tennessee
and Hermitage, Pennsylvania. The cost of these projects is
anticipated to be approximately $14.0 million. At September 30,
2007, the Company had commitments of approximately $2.6 million for these
projects, all of which is expected to be incurred in the remainder of
2007. We expect to fund these projects from cash flows from
operations and unused availability under our senior credit
facility.
In
May
2006, we repaid $5.0 million of subordinated debt under our junior credit
facility using additional borrowings under the revolving portion of our senior
credit facility, and in May 2007, we repaid the remaining $5.0 million principal
balance of our junior credit facility.
In
addition to our modernization and expansion, our primary cash requirements
include working capital, capital expenditures and interest and principal
payments on indebtedness under our senior credit facility. We expect
our primary sources of cash to be cash flow from operations, cash and cash
equivalents on hand at September 30, 2007 and borrowings from unused
availability under our senior credit facility. We expect these
sources to be sufficient to satisfy our cash needs for the remainder of
2007.
Credit
Facilities and Other Obligations
Senior
Credit Facility
We
are
party to a Credit Agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association, for
a
$27.0 million senior secured credit facility. The senior credit
facility consists of a $20.0 million revolving credit facility, and a $7.0
million term loan. The senior credit facility is secured by
substantially all of our assets, and contains customary representations and
warranties, events of default and affirmative and negative covenants for
secured
facilities of this type. On July 11, 2007, we agreed with
Wachovia to make certain amendments to the Senior Credit Agreement which
are
described below.
Formerly,
in the absence of a default, all borrowings under the revolving credit facility
bore interest at the LIBOR Market Index Rate (as defined in the Credit
Agreement) plus a margin of between 1.75% to 2.50% per annum that was subject
to
adjustment from time to time based upon the Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as
defined in the Credit Agreement), and the term loan bore interest at a 30-day
adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin of between 1.75% to 2.50% per annum that
was
subject to adjustment from time to time based upon the Consolidated Leverage
Ratio. The revolving credit facility was scheduled to expire on
June 15, 2008, and the Term Loan was scheduled to mature on June 15,
2010.
15
Under
the
amended Credit Agreement, the non-default rate of interest under the revolving
credit facility and term loan was reduced to be the LIBOR Market Index Rate
plus
a margin of between 0.75% to 1.50% per annum that is subject to adjustment
from
time to time based upon the Consolidated Leverage Ratio, and the maturity
date
of the revolving credit facility was extended to June 17, 2010. The
amendments also increased the ratio of leverage permitted under the Consolidated
Leverage Ratio covenant, and extended and modified certain of the negative
covenants and events of default set forth in the Credit Agreement.
At
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had no outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit facility.
Junior
Credit Facility
In
May
2006, we repaid $5.0 million of subordinated debt under our junior credit
facility with William G. Miller, and in May 2007, we repaid the remaining
$5.0
million principal balance under the junior credit facility. With such
payments, all loans under our junior credit facility were paid in
full. In July 2007, in connection with the amendments to the Credit
Agreement for our senior credit facility, the junior credit facility was
terminated.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
Because
of the amount of obligations outstanding under our senior credit facility
and
the connection of the interest rate under such facility (including the default
rates) to the LIBOR rate, an increase in the LIBOR rate could have an effect
on
our ability to satisfy our obligations under this facility and increase our
interest expense. Therefore, our liquidity and access to capital
resources could be further affected by increasing interest rates.
Other
Long-Term Obligations
In
addition to the borrowings under the senior credit facility described above,
we
had approximately $2.1 million of mortgage notes payable, equipment notes
payable and other long-term obligations at September 30,
2007. We also had approximately $2.2 million in non-cancelable
operating lease obligations.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Within
90
days prior to the filing date of this report, we carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
our Co-Chief Executive Officers (Co-CEOs) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO),
of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls
and
procedures as defined in Rules 13a14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934. Based upon this evaluation, our Co-CEOs and CFO have concluded
that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and
forms.
There
were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors
that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of this
evaluation.
16
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We
are,
from time to time, a party to litigation arising in the normal course of
our
business. Litigation is subject to various inherent uncertainties,
and it is possible that some of these matters could be resolved unfavorably
to
us, which could result in substantial damages against us. We have
established accruals for matters that are probable and reasonably estimable
and
maintain product liability and other insurance that management believes to
be
adequate. Management believes that any liability that may ultimately
result from the resolution of these matters in excess of available insurance
coverage and accruals will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
ITEM
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
There
have been no material changes to the Risk Factors included in our Annual
Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006.
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
On
November 5, 2007, the Board of Directors approved and adopted Amended and
Restated Bylaws of the Company, which include amendments to Article IV thereof
to expressly provide for the ability to issue uncertificated
shares. These amendments are intended to comply with Rule 501.00 of
the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual which requires issuers
to be
eligible for a direct registration program that permits an investor’s ownership
to be recorded and maintained on the books of the issuer or its transfer
agent
without the issuance of a physical stock certificate.
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
3.1
|
Charter,
as amended, of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to
the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on
April 22, 2002)
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant*
|
31.1
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) by Co-Chief Executive
Officer*
|
31.2
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) by Co-Chief Executive
Officer*
|
31.3
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) by Chief Financial
Officer*
|
32.1
|
Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of United States
Code
by Co-Chief Executive Officer*
|
32.2
|
Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of United States
Code
by Co-Chief Executive Officer*
|
32.3
|
Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of United States
Code
by Chief Financial Officer*
|
______________
* Filed
herewith
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934, Miller Industries, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on
its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
MILLER INDUSTRIES, INC. | ||||
By: | /s/ J. Vincent Mish | |||
J. Vincent Mish | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Date: November 8,
2007
|
18