MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC - Quarter Report: 2005 October (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | ||
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2005 |
||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 000-25142
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas
|
76-0210849 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
8141 SH 75 South
P.O. Box 1175
Huntsville, Texas 77342
(Address of principal executive offices)
P.O. Box 1175
Huntsville, Texas 77342
(Address of principal executive offices)
(936) 291-2277
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No þ
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No þ
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date: 9,259,376 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were
outstanding as of December 7, 2005.
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
INDEX
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share data)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share data)
January 31, | October 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 13,138 | $ | 15,196 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $723 and $1,210 |
6,021 | 7,099 | ||||||
Current portion of notes receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful
notes of $286 and $198 |
1,192 | 584 | ||||||
Inventories |
| 1,679 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
705 | 530 | ||||||
Current assets of discontinued operations |
393 | 388 | ||||||
Total current assets |
21,449 | 25,476 | ||||||
Seismic equipment lease pool, property and equipment |
74,792 | 77,338 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation of seismic equipment lease
pool, property and equipment |
(55,067 | ) | (59,961 | ) | ||||
Goodwill |
| 5,324 | ||||||
Long-term assets of discontinued operations |
216 | | ||||||
Other assets |
5 | 15 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 41,395 | $ | 48,192 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,893 | $ | 1,272 | ||||
Current maturities long-term debt |
918 | | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
652 | 644 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
284 | 151 | ||||||
Wages payable |
299 | 163 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
458 | 1,391 | ||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
14 | 5 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
7,518 | 3,626 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
| 3,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
7,518 | 6,626 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 1,000,000
shares authorized; none issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized; 9,893,732 and 10,112,062 shares
issued, respectively |
99 | 101 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
62,702 | 63,582 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost (915,000 shares) |
(4,686 | ) | (4,686 | ) | ||||
Deferred compensation |
(94 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit |
(26,282 | ) | (20,048 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
2,138 | 2,629 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
33,877 | 41,566 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 41,395 | $ | 48,192 | ||||
3
Table of Contents
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, | October 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Equipment leasing |
$ | 3,948 | $ | 6,676 | $ | 12,727 | $ | 17,668 | ||||||||
Equipment sales |
790 | 3,139 | 6,610 | 6,787 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
4,738 | 9,815 | 19,337 | 24,455 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Direct costs seismic leasing |
450 | 968 | 1,350 | 2,174 | ||||||||||||
Cost of equipment sales |
557 | 1,308 | 3,371 | 3,072 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,471 | 2,381 | 5,419 | 6,488 | ||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
122 | 82 | 122 | 161 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,700 | 2,253 | 8,113 | 6,585 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
5,300 | 6,992 | 18,375 | 18,480 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(562 | ) | 2,823 | 962 | 5,975 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) net |
46 | 123 | 80 | 349 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(43 | ) | (39 | ) | (156 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes |
(559 | ) | 2,907 | 886 | 6,256 | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
264 | 57 | 264 | 25 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
(823 | ) | 2,850 | 622 | 6,231 | |||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes of $0 |
| | 80 | | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (823 | ) | $ | 2,850 | $ | 702 | $ | 6,231 | |||||||
Income (loss) per common share from continuing
operations |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.69 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.64 | |||||||
Income per common share from discontinued operations |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | | $ | | $ | 0.01 | $ | | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | | $ | | $ | 0.01 | $ | | ||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.69 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.64 | |||||||
Shares used in computing net income per common
share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
8,880,000 | 9,152,000 | 8,824,000 | 9,061,000 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents |
| 750,000 | 411,000 | 684,000 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
8,880,000 | 9,902,000 | 9,235,000 | 9,745,000 | ||||||||||||
4
Table of Contents
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
October 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2005 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 622 | $ | 6,231 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
8,113 | 6,585 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| 82 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts, net of charge offs |
148 | 162 | ||||||
Net book value of seismic equipment sold |
1,770 | 109 | ||||||
Changes in: |
||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
358 | (58 | ) | |||||
Inventories |
| (792 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
| 367 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
| (133 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
current liabilities |
(639 | ) | (4,494 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
10,372 | 8,059 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of seismic equipment held for lease |
(1,687 | ) | (3,274 | ) | ||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(284 | ) | (374 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of Seamap, net of cash acquired |
| (2,473 | ) | |||||
Seamap acquisition costs |
| (56 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,971 | ) | (6,177 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of options |
703 | 882 | ||||||
Payments on borrowings |
(2,940 | ) | (918 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(2,237 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents-continuing operations |
6,164 | 1,846 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents-discontinued
operations |
(69 | ) | 212 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
6,834 | 13,138 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 12,929 | $ | 15,196 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 156 | $ | 70 | ||||
Seismic equipment acquired in exchange for cancellation
of accounts receivable |
$ | 685 | $ | | ||||
Noncash transactions: |
||||||||
Seamap shareholder notes payable |
$ | | $ | 3,000 | ||||
5
Table of Contents
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | Basis of Presentation | |
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (Mitcham or the Company) have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2005. In the opinion of the Company, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position as of October 31, 2005; the results of operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004; and the cash flows for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, have been included. The foregoing interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results of the operations to be expected for the full fiscal year ending January 31, 2006. | ||
Certain 2004 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or loss. | ||
2. | Organization | |
Mitcham Industries, Inc., a Texas corporation, was incorporated in 1987. The Company and Mitcham Canada Ltd., its wholly owned Canadian subsidiary, provide full-service equipment leasing, sales and service to the seismic industry worldwide, primarily in North and South America. The Company, through its wholly owned Australian subsidiary, Seismic Asia Pacific Pty Ltd. (SAP), provides seismic, oceanographic and hydrographic leasing and sales worldwide, primarily in Asia and Australia. The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Seamap International Holdings Pte, Ltd., (Seamap), designs, develops and markets a broad range of proprietary products for the seismic, hydrographic and offshore industries with product sales and support facilities based in Huntsville, Texas, Singapore and the United Kingdom. Through its wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, Drilling Services, Inc. (DSI), the Company provided seismic survey program design, quality control, permit acquisition, geographical surveying and shot hole drilling, all commonly referred to as front-end services. In August 2003, the Company sold the operating assets of DSI. The operating results and assets and liabilities of DSI are classified as discontinued operations and all prior period statements have been reclassified accordingly. See Note 9. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. | ||
3. | Acquisitions | |
On July 12, 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of Seamap. Seamap is engaged in the manufacture and sale of state-of-the-art seismic and offshore telemetry systems. As a result of this acquisition, Seamaps proprietary products will expand Mitchams market and diversify its customer base and will be a complement to Mitchams growing marine rental and sales business. Mitcham will have a broader range of product offerings and the addition of strategic facilities in support of Mitchams expanding global operations. The consolidated financial statements for and as of the nine-month period ended October 31, 2005 include the assets and liabilities and the operating results for the period from acquisition date through October 31, 2005. Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations, Mitcham applied purchase accounting to the transaction, resulting in the initial recognition of additional property and equipment of $150,000. Mitcham recognized goodwill of approximately $5.3 million from the transaction. None of the goodwill recognized is deductible for tax purposes. The allocation of the purchase price may change as time progresses and more information is obtained about the assets acquired. |
6
Table of Contents
The purchase included all the net assets of Seamap, which are located in Huntsville, Texas, Singapore and in the United Kingdom. Seamap was purchased for a total of $6.5 million, consisting of $3.5 million paid in cash at closing and $3.0 million issued in promissory notes payable to the former shareholders of Seamap (see Note 5). The terms of the purchase and sale agreement provide for two additional earn-out payments of $1.0 million if Seamap achieves certain annual revenue thresholds of $8.0 million and $10.0 million over a five-year period ending April 30, 2010. Mitcham believes that the purchase price of Seamap will be economically recovered from future cash flow of Seamap. | ||
The following is a summary of the preliminary allocations of the aggregate purchase price to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the respective date of acquisition (in thousands): |
Current assets |
$ | 2,635 | ||
Equipment |
150 | |||
Current liabilities |
(1,579 | ) | ||
Goodwill |
5,324 | |||
Acquisition costs |
59 | |||
Total purchase price |
$ | 6,589 | ||
At the time of the acquisition, Seamap had approximately $150,000 of fixed assets. These assets consisted primarily of vehicles, computer and workshop equipment and will remain in use in the same manner as prior to the acquisition. | ||
Pro Forma Results of Operations | ||
The following pro forma results of operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2005 and the three and nine months ended October 31, 2004 assumes the acquisition occurred on February 1, 2004, and reflects the full results of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods presented. The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to indicate the results of operations which would actually have occurred had the combinations been in effect on the dates indicated, or which may occur in the future. |
Three Months Ended October 31, | Nine Months Ended October 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 6,483 | $ | 9,815 | $ | 24,220 | $ | 29,494 | ||||||||
Income from
continuing
operations |
$ | 54 | $ | 2,850 | $ | 2,471 | $ | 7,015 | ||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 54 | $ | 2,850 | $ | 2,551 | $ | 7,015 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.01 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.01 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.72 |
4. | Inventories | |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories consist of the following (in thousands): |
October 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2005 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | | $ | 698 | ||||
Finished goods |
| 981 | ||||||
Total inventories |
$ | | $ | 1,679 | ||||
7
Table of Contents
5. | Debt | |
On March 30, 2004, we obtained a $4.0 million revolving loan agreement and credit line with First Victoria National Bank. The line provided us with funds to purchase equipment and was secured by the equipment purchased and any leases on that equipment. Interest was payable monthly at prime plus 1/2%. Principal was due on each note 25% after six months, 25% after nine months and the remaining 50% after a year from the date of each note. The revolving loan and credit line expired on June 30, 2005. | ||
On June 27, 2005, we obtained a $12.5 million revolving loan agreement and credit line with First Victoria National Bank. This line replaced and increased the expiring credit line of $4.0 million with First Victoria National Bank. The new facility has a two-year term and bears interest at the prime rate. The credit line allows us to borrow funds to purchase equipment and is secured by the equipment purchased and any leases on that equipment. Interest on any outstanding principle balance is payable monthly, while the principal is due at the end of the two-year term. The revolving loan agreement also contains certain financial covenants that require, among other things, that we maintain a debt to shareholders equity ratio of a maximum of 1.3 to 1.0, maintain a current assets to current liabilities ratio of a minimum of 1.25 to 1.0, and not incur or maintain any indebtedness or obligations or guarantee the debts or obligations of others in a total aggregate amount which exceeds $1.0 million without the prior written approval of First Victoria National Bank, except for indebtedness incurred as a result of the Seamap acquisition and other specific exceptions. We have not borrowed any funds available under this credit line. | ||
In connection with the Seamap acquisition, the Company issued $3.0 million in promissory notes payable to the shareholders of Seamap. The notes are three-year, 5% notes with no principal or interest due in the first 12 months. Interest on the full amount of the principal is due on the first anniversary of the notes in the amount of $150,000. No further interest or principal payments are due until the second anniversary of the notes. At that time, interest on the full amount of the notes and 50% or $1.5 million of the principal amount of $3.0 million is due. On the third anniversary of the notes, interest on the unpaid principal and the remainder of the principal is due. The terms of the purchase and sale agreement provide for additional earn-out payments of $1.0 million, each subject to Seamap achieving certain annual revenue thresholds of $8.0 million and $10.0 million over a five-year period. | ||
6. | Comprehensive Income | |
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general-purpose financial statements. Comprehensive income generally represents all changes in shareholders equity (deficit) during the period, except those resulting from investments by, or distributions to, shareholders. The Company has comprehensive income related to changes in foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rates, which is recorded as follows (in thousands): |
Three Months Ended October 31, | Nine Months Ended October 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (823 | ) | $ | 2,850 | $ | 702 | $ | 6,231 | |||||||
Change in foreign
currency
translation
adjustment |
776 | 418 | 585 | 491 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss) |
$ | (47 | ) | $ | 3,268 | $ | 1,287 | $ | 6,722 | |||||||
7. | Earnings Per Share | |
For the three and nine months ended October 31, 2004 and 2005, the following table sets forth the number of dilutive shares that may be issued pursuant to stock options currently outstanding, which number was used in the per share calculations. |
Three Months Ended October 31, | Nine Months Ended October 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Stock options |
| 737,000 | 411,000 | 673,000 | ||||||||||||
Warrants |
| 13,000 | | 11,000 | ||||||||||||
| 750,000 | 411,000 | 684,000 | |||||||||||||
8
Table of Contents
8. | Stock Options | |
The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plans under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The pro forma information below is based on provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, issued in December 2002 (in thousands except per share amounts). |
Three Months Ended October 31, | Nine Months Ended October 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Pro forma impact of fair value method
(FAS 148) |
||||||||||||||||
Reported income (loss) from
continuing operations |
$ | (823 | ) | $ | 2,850 | $ | 622 | $ | 6,231 | |||||||
Less: fair value impact of employee
stock compensation |
(110 | ) | (346 | ) | (248 | ) | (830 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma income (loss) from
continuing operations |
$ | (933 | ) | $ | 2,504 | $ | 374 | $ | 5,401 | |||||||
Reported net income (loss) |
$ | (823 | ) | $ | 2,850 | $ | 702 | $ | 6,231 | |||||||
Less: fair value impact of employee
stock compensation |
(110 | ) | (346 | ) | (248 | ) | (830 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
$ | (933 | ) | $ | 2,504 | $ | 454 | $ | 5,401 | |||||||
Income per common share |
||||||||||||||||
Reported continuing operations income
(loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.69 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.64 | |||||||
Pro forma continuing operations
income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.60 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.55 | |||||||
Reported net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.69 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.64 | |||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.60 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.55 | |||||||
Weighted average Black-Scholes fair
value assumptions |
||||||||||||||||
Risk free interest rate |
3-5 | % | 3-5 | % | 3-5 | % | 3-5 | % | ||||||||
Expected life |
3-8 yrs. | 8 yrs. | 3-8 yrs. | 8 yrs. | ||||||||||||
Expected volatility |
65-68 | % | 63-69 | % | 65-68 | % | 63-69 | % | ||||||||
Expected dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % |
9. | Discontinued Operations | |
On August 1, 2003, the Company sold the operating assets of DSI, which comprised all of the operating assets of the Companys front-end services segment. The Companys decision to sell DSI resulted from the over-capacity in that market segment. Proceeds from the sale were $250,000 cash and an $800,000 note receivable due over three years. Additionally, the buyer assumed $143,000 of capitalized lease obligations. |
9
Table of Contents
Effective with the October 31, 2003 financial statements, the operating results of DSI are presented as discontinued operations and all prior period statements have been reclassified accordingly. A summary of DSIs revenues and pretax income (loss) is reflected as follows (in thousands): |
Three Months Ended October 31, | Nine Months Ended October 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Pretax income (loss) |
$ | | $ | | $ | 80 | $ | |
A summary of DSIs assets and liabilities is reflected as follows (in thousands): |
January 31, | October 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2005 | |||||||
Accounts and notes receivable of discontinued
operations |
$ | 498 | $ | 376 | ||||
Other current assets of discontinued operations |
$ | 111 | $ | 12 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities of
discontinued operations |
$ | 14 | $ | 5 |
10. | Segment Reporting | |
The Seamap Segment designs, develops and markets a broad range of proprietary products for the seismic, hydrographic and offshore industries with product sales and support facilities based in Huntsville, Texas, Singapore and the United Kingdom. Seamaps primary products include a next generation marine seismic source synchronizer and hydrophone acquisition system, a passive acoustic tracking system for cetacean monitoring and acoustic energy assessment, seabed recording instrumentation utilized in electromagnetic sounding technology for oil and gas exploration, and a ruggedized real-time GPS tracking system. | ||
The Mitcham Segment offers for lease or sale, new and experienced seismic equipment to the oil and gas industry, seismic contractors, environmental agencies, government agencies and universities. Mitcham is headquartered in Huntsville, Texas, with sales and services offices in Calgary, Canada, Brisbane, Australia and associates throughout Europe, South America and Asia. | ||
Financial information by business segment is set forth below net of any allocations (in thousands): |
Three Months Ended October 31, 2005 | Nine Months Ended October 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Seamap | Mitcham | Total | Seamap | Mitcham | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,656 | $ | 8,159 | $ | 9,815 | $ | 2,129 | $ | 22,326 | $ | 24,455 | ||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 49 | $ | 2,801 | $ | 2,850 | $ | 108 | $ | 6,123 | $ | 6,231 | ||||||||||||
October 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 8,304 | $ | 39,888 | $ | 48,192 |
10
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
Mitcham Industries, Inc. (the Company), a Texas corporation, was incorporated in 1987. Since our
organization, we have primarily been engaged in the leasing and sales of seismic equipment to the
seismic industry worldwide. The Company consists of the operations of Mitcham Industries, Inc. and
our three wholly owned subsidiaries, Mitcham Canada Ltd., Seismic Asia Pacific Pty Ltd. (SAP),
and Seamap International Holdings Pte Ltd. (Seamap), which the Company acquired on July 12,
2005. Seamap operates through its three wholly owned subsidiaries, Seamap Inc., Seamap (UK) Ltd.,
and Seamap Pte. Ltd. Through its wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, Drilling Services, Inc. (DSI),
the Company provided seismic survey program design, quality control, permit acquisition,
geographical surveying and shot hole drilling, all commonly referred to as front-end services.
In August 2003, the Company sold the operating assets of DSI.
Our revenues are directly related to the level of worldwide oil and gas exploration activities and
the profitability and cash flows of oil and gas companies and seismic contractors, which in turn
are affected by expectations regarding the supply and demand for oil and natural gas, energy prices
and finding and development costs. Seismic data acquisition activity levels are measured in terms
of the number of active recording crews, known as the crew
count, and the number of recording
channels deployed by those crews. Because an accurate and reliable census of active crews does not
exist, it is not possible to make definitive statements regarding the absolute levels of seismic
data acquisition activity. Furthermore, a significant number of seismic data acquisition
contractors are either private or state-owned enterprises and information about their activities is
not available in the public domain. We believe that we are the largest independent lessor of
seismic equipment. Due to this unique position, we have access to information about future
projects from many data acquisition contractors. Based on our analysis of various indicators,
including recent bid activity, equipment movement and public announcements of companies adding crew
capacity, it appears that the seismic exploration market is in an uptrend. We believe that this
increase is being driven by historically high world oil and North American natural gas prices,
combined with the maturation of the worlds hydrocarbon producing basins. The future direction and
magnitude of changes in seismic data acquisition activity levels will continue to be dependent upon
oil and natural gas prices.
We lease and sell seismic data acquisition equipment primarily to seismic data acquisition
companies conducting land, marine and transition zone seismic surveys worldwide. We provide
short-term leasing of seismic equipment to meet a customers requirements and offer technical
support during the lease term. The majority of all active leases at October 31, 2005 were for a
term of less than one year. Seismic equipment held for lease is carried at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation. In addition to leasing of seismic equipment, SAP sells equipment, consumables,
systems integration, engineering hardware and software maintenance support services to the seismic,
hydrographic, oceanographic, environmental and defense industries throughout Southeast Asia and
Australia.
On July 12, 2005, we acquired Seamap, which designs, develops and markets a broad range of
proprietary products for the seismic, hydrographic and offshore industries with product sales and
support facilities based in Huntsville, Texas, Singapore and the United Kingdom. Seamaps primary
products include a next generation marine seismic source synchronizer and hydrophone acquisition
system, a passive acoustic tracking system for cetacean monitoring and acoustic energy assessment,
seabed recording instrumentation utilized in electromagnetic sounding technology for oil and gas
exploration, and a ruggedized real-time GPS tracking system. Financial results from Seamap are
included from the acquisition date of July 12, 2005.
Seismic equipment leasing is susceptible to weather patterns in certain geographic regions. Our
lease revenue is seasonal, especially in Canada, where a significant percentage of seismic survey
activity occurs in the winter months, from November through March. During the months in which the
weather is warmer, certain areas are not accessible to trucks, earth vibrators and other equipment
because of the unstable terrain. This seasonal leasing activity by our Canadian customers has
historically resulted in increased lease revenues in our first and fourth fiscal quarters.
Results of Operations
For the three months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004
For the quarter ended October 31, 2005, we recorded net income of $2.9 million, compared to a net
loss for the comparable quarter of 2004 of $0.8 million.
11
Table of Contents
During the quarter ended October 31, 2005, our results of operations were affected by several
significant factors, which are discussed below. Our revenues increased approximately $5.1 million,
reflecting an increase in leasing revenues of $2.7 million, and an increase in equipment sales of
$2.4 million from the corresponding quarter in the prior fiscal year.
Our fixed and variable costs are important factors affecting our results of operations. Due to the
size and age of our seismic equipment lease pool, depreciation expense, which amounted to $2.3
million for the quarter ended October 31, 2005, historically has been our single largest expense
item. This expense will vary between periods based on acquisitions of new equipment and sales of
equipment with remaining depreciable life. Direct costs of seismic leasing are variable expenses
that fluctuate with our equipment leasing revenues. The main components of this cost are freight,
sublease expenses and repairs and maintenance, to the extent that repairs performed are normal wear
and tear and not billable to the lease customer.
Revenues
For the quarter ended October 31, 2005, consolidated revenues increased by $5.1 million, or 107%,
to a total of $9.8 million, as compared to $4.7 million for the corresponding quarter in 2004. The
increase was comprised of a $2.7 million increase in leasing revenues, in addition to a $2.4
million increase in sales of equipment. For the quarter ended October 31, 2005, leasing revenues
increased to $6.7 million compared to $3.9 million in the prior year. Due to increased demand, our
leasing revenues doubled in our U.S. operations to $4.4 million from $2.2 million in 2004, while
leasing revenues in our other operations increased by $0.5 million in the quarter ended October 31,
2005 as compared to the corresponding quarter in 2004.
Equipment sales for the quarter ended October 31, 2005 were $3.1 million as compared to $0.8
million for the comparable quarter in 2004. Sales by Seamap accounted for $1.7 million of the
increase. The remaining portion of the increase is attributable to sales of seismic equipment.
Cost of equipment sales for the quarters ended October 31, 2005 and 2004 were $1.3 million and $0.6
million, respectively, with $0.6 million attributable to Seamap operations. The remaining portion
of the increase is attributable to Mitchams other operations. Gross margins on equipment sales
were 58% and 29% for the quarters ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Gross margins on
equipment sales may vary significantly between periods due to the mix of sales revenue between new
seismic and oceanographic equipment as compared to sales of depreciated seismic equipment sold from
our lease pool.
Costs and Expenses
For the quarter ended October 31, 2005, depreciation expense was $2.3 million, which was $0.4
million, or 17%, lower than the depreciation expense for the comparable quarter in 2004. The
decrease in depreciation expense from the quarter ended October 31, 2004 to the comparable quarter
for 2005 was primarily due to certain equipment reaching the end of its depreciable life during
each of those years, coupled with the sales of assets with remaining depreciable life.
Direct costs for the quarter ended October 31, 2005 were $1.0 million, which was approximately $0.6
million more than direct costs for the comparable quarter in 2004. The increase was primarily due
to additional repair and leasing expense resulting from the increase in leasing activity.
General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended October 31, 2005 totaled approximately
$2.4 million, or $0.9 million greater than 2004 expenses of $1.5 million. The increase in general
and administrative expenses was primarily due to the addition of Seamap general and administrative
expenses of $0.8 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in legal fees.
For the quarter ended October 31, 2005, we recorded estimated income tax provision in the amount of
$0.1 million, compared to $0.3 million of income tax provision in the comparable quarter of the
prior year. The estimated tax provision was primarily attributable to Mitchams Texas operations,
after taking into account all net operating loss carry-forwards available to us.
12
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
For the nine months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004
Revenues
For the nine months ended October 31, 2005, we recorded net income of $6.2 million, compared to
$0.7 million for the comparable period in 2004.
Consolidated revenues increased to $24.5 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 from
$19.3 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2004. For the nine months ended October 31,
2005, leasing revenues increased $4.9 million, primarily due to an increase in leasing activity in
our U.S. and Canadian operations.
Equipment sales for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 were $6.8 million as compared to $6.6
million for the comparable period in 2004. Equipment sales related to Seamap totaled $2.1 million.
Mitchams revenue generation priority is for short-term leasing of equipment. Sales of seismic
equipment are conducted only when an appropriate opportunity is present. Cost of equipment sales
for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004 were $3.1 million and $3.4 million,
respectively. Cost of equipment sales for Seamap was $0.9 million. Gross margins on equipment
sales were 55% and 49% for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Gross
margins on equipment sales may vary significantly between periods due to the mix of sales revenue
between new seismic and oceanographic equipment as compared to sales of depreciated seismic
equipment sold from our lease pool.
Costs and Expenses
For the nine months ended October 31, 2005, depreciation expense was $6.6 million, which was $1.5
million, or 19%, lower than the depreciation expense in the comparable nine-month period in 2004.
The decrease in depreciation expense for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 from the comparable
nine-month period ended October 31, 2004 was principally due to certain equipment reaching the end
of its depreciable life during each of those years, coupled with the sales of assets with remaining
depreciable life.
Direct costs for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 were $2.2 million, which was approximately
$0.8 million higher than the direct cost expense for the comparable period in 2004. The increase
in direct costs was primarily a result of higher equipment repair expenses resulting from an
increase in leasing activity.
General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 totaled
approximately $6.5 million, or $1.1 million greater than 2004 expenses of $5.4 million. The
increase in general and administrative expenses was due to the addition of Seamaps general and
administrative expenses of $1.0 million, and an increase in wages and accounting and consulting
expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in legal fees.
Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 included a foreign
tax credit that was recently settled.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of October 31, 2005, we had net working capital of approximately $21.8 million as compared to
net working capital of $13.9 million at January 31, 2005. Historically, our principal liquidity
requirements and uses of cash have been for capital expenditures and working capital. Our
principal sources of cash have been cash flows from operations and proceeds from sales of lease
pool equipment. Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended October 31,
2005 was $8.1 million, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $10.4 million
for the nine months ended October 31, 2004. The decrease in 2005 was due in large part to
reductions in accounts payable related to payments made for the acquisition of seismic and other
equipment of more than $3.6 million in the first six months of the year. Net cash used in financing
activities for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 was not material, compared to net cash used
in financing activities for the comparable period in 2004 of $2.2 million.
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended October 31, 2005 totaled approximately $3.6 million
as compared to capital expenditures of $2.0 million for the comparable period in 2004. Our 2005
and 2004 capital expenditures for the seismic equipment lease pool were made to fulfill specific
lease contracts.
At October 31, 2005, we had trade accounts and notes receivable of $1.4 million that were more than
90 days past due. As of October 31, 2005, our allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately
$1.4 million, which management believes is sufficient to cover any losses in our receivable
balances.
13
Table of Contents
In certain instances when customers have been unable to repay their open accounts receivable
balances in accordance with our standard terms, we have agreed to a structured repayment program
using an interest-bearing promissory note. In these cases, we provide a reserve for doubtful
accounts against the balance. Due to the uncertainty of collection, we do not recognize the
interest earned until the entire principal balance has been collected. In most cases where we have
a chronic collection problem with a particular customer, future business is done on a prepayment
basis or, if additional credit is extended, revenues are not recognized until collected. Although
the extension of repayment terms on open accounts receivables temporarily reduces our cash flow
from operations, we believe that this practice is necessary in light of seismic industry conditions
and that it has not adversely affected our ability to conduct routine business.
Additionally, we occasionally offer extended payment terms on equipment sales transactions. These
terms are generally less than one year in duration. Until there is a question as to whether an
account is collectible, the sales revenue and cost of goods sold is recognized at the inception of
the transaction.
In February 2002, we obtained an $8.5 million term loan with First Victoria National Bank, the
remaining principal balance of which was repaid as of July 31, 2005.
On March 30, 2004, we obtained a $4.0 million revolving loan agreement and credit line with First
Victoria National Bank. The line provided us with funds to purchase equipment and was secured by
the equipment purchased and any leases on that equipment. Interest was payable monthly at prime
plus 1/2%. Principal was due on each note 25% after six months, 25% after nine months and the
remaining 50% after a year from the date of each note. The revolving loan and credit line expired
on June 30, 2005.
On June 27, 2005, we obtained a $12.5 million revolving loan agreement and credit line with First
Victoria National Bank. This line replaced and increased the expiring credit line of $4.0 million
with First Victoria National Bank. The new facility has a two-year term and bears interest at the
prime rate. The credit line allows us to borrow funds to purchase equipment and is secured by the
equipment purchased and any leases on that equipment. Interest on any outstanding principle
balance is payable monthly, while the principal is due at the end of the two-year term. The
revolving loan agreement also contains certain financial covenants that require, among other
things, that we maintain a debt to shareholders equity ratio of a maximum of 1.3 to 1.0, maintain
a current assets to current liabilities ratio of a minimum of 1.25 to 1.0, and not incur or
maintain any indebtedness or obligations or guarantee the debts or obligations of others in a total
aggregate amount which exceeds $1.0 million without the prior written approval of First Victoria
National Bank, except for indebtedness incurred as a result of the Seamap acquisition and other
specific exceptions.
We have not borrowed any funds available under this credit line. Although we have sufficient cash
to meet known commitments and no current plans to draw down any amount, this credit line gives us
the financial flexibility to acquire equipment for resale and for lease, as needed, on short notice
to take advantage of strategic opportunities.
On July 12, 2005, we acquired 100% of the stock of Seamap. Seamap is a company engaged in the
manufacture and sale of state of the art seismic and offshore telemetry systems. The purchase
involved all the assets of Seamap in its locations in Huntsville, Texas, Singapore and in the
United Kingdom. Seamap was purchased for $6.5 million, consisting of $3.5 million paid in cash at
closing and $3.0 million issued in promissory notes payable to the shareholders of Seamap. The cash
was provided from cash flow from operations. The notes are three-year, 5% notes with no principal
or interest due in the first 12 months. Interest on the full amount of the principal is due on the
first anniversary of the notes in the amount of $150,000. No further interest or principal payments
are due until the second anniversary of the notes. At that time, interest on the full amount of the
notes and 50% or $1.5 million of the principal amount of $3.0 million is due. On the third
anniversary of the notes, interest on the unpaid principal and the remainder of the principal is
due. The terms of the purchase and sale agreement provide for additional earn-out payments of $1.0
million each if Seamap achieves certain annual revenue thresholds of $8.0 million and $10.0 million
over a five-year period. Mitcham believes that the purchase price of Seamap will be economically
recovered from future cash flow of Seamap.
At the present time, we believe that cash on hand and cash provided by future operations will be
sufficient to fund our anticipated capital and liquidity needs over the next twelve months.
However, should demand warrant, we may pursue additional borrowings to fund capital expenditures
and acquisitions.
14
Table of Contents
New Russian Operation
In November, 2005, Mitcham established a new wholly owned subsidiary in Ufa, Russia named Mitcham
Seismic Eurasia LLC (MSE). This subsidiary will perform equipment rental and technical
assistance services primarily for the Russia, CIS and Eurasia theatre of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions in determining the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Significant estimates made by us in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements relate to reserves for uncollectible accounts
receivable and useful lives of our lease pool assets and their valuation.
Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of a companys
financial position and results of operations and require managements subjective judgment. Below is
a brief discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Leases
We recognize lease revenue ratably over the term of the lease until there is a question as to
whether it is collectible. Commission income is recognized once it has been paid to us. We do not
enter into leases with embedded maintenance obligations. Under our standard lease contract, the
lessee is responsible for maintenance and repairs to the equipment, excluding normal wear and tear.
We provide technical advice to our customers as part of our customer service practices.
Equipment Sales
We recognize revenue and cost of goods sold from the equipment sales upon agreement of terms and
when delivery has occurred unless there is a question as to its collectibility. We occasionally
offer extended payment terms on equipment sales transactions. These terms are generally less than
one year in duration.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We make provisions to the allowance for doubtful accounts periodically, as conditions warrant,
based on whether such receivables are collectible. In certain instances when customers have been
unable to repay their open accounts receivable balances, we have agreed to a structured repayment
program using an interest-bearing promissory note. In these cases, we provide a reserve for
doubtful accounts against the balance and do not recognize interest earned until the entire
principal balance has been collected.
Long-Lived Assets
We carry property and equipment at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, and compute depreciation
on the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the property and equipment, which
range from three to seven years. Buildings are depreciated over 40 years, property improvements are
amortized over 10 years and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of useful life or
the life of the leases. We review our long-lived assets for impairment at each reporting date. If
our assessment of the carrying amount of such assets exceeds the fair market value in accordance
with the applicable accounting regulations, we record an impairment charge. During fiscal 2004, we
recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $0.7 million related to the sale of DSIs operating
assets.
Income Taxes
We account for our taxes under the liability method, whereby we recognize, on a current and
long-term basis, deferred tax assets and liabilities which represent differences between the
financial and income tax reporting bases of our assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is
established when uncertainty exists as to the ultimate realization of net deferred tax assets. As
of January 31, 2004 and 2005, we have recorded a net deferred tax asset of $10.1 million and $9.9
million, respectively. As we believe it is not assured that these net deferred tax assets will be
realized, we have provided valuation allowances of $10.1 million and $9.9 million at January 31,
2004 and 2005, respectively.
15
Table of Contents
We periodically reevaluate these estimates and assumptions as circumstances change. Such factors
may significantly impact our results of operations from period to period.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We operate internationally, giving rise to exposure to market risks from changes in foreign
exchange rates to the extent that transactions are not denominated in U.S. dollars. We typically
denominate the majority of our lease and sales contracts in U.S., Canadian and Australian dollars
to mitigate the exposure to fluctuations in foreign currencies. Since the majority of our lease
and sales contracts with our customers are denominated in U.S., Canadian and Australian dollars,
there is little risk of economic (as opposed to accounting) loss from fluctuations in foreign
currencies.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
As required by the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) Rule 13a-15(b), we evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation
of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our
current disclosure controls and procedures are effective to timely alert them to material
information regarding the Company that is required to be included in our periodic reports filed
with the SEC, and that our internal controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that our
financial statements are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. During the three months ended October 31, 2005, we have
made no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors
Certain information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (including statements contained
in Part I, Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, Part I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures and in Part II, Item 1. Legal
Proceedings), as well as other written and oral statements made or incorporated by reference from
time to time by us and our representatives in other reports, filings
with the SEC, press releases, conferences, or otherwise, may be
deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). This information includes, without limitation,
statements concerning our future financial position and results of operations; planned capital
expenditures; business strategy and other plans for future operations; the future mix of revenues
and business; commitments and contingent liabilities; and future demand for our services and
predicted improvement in energy industry and seismic service industry conditions. Although we
believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can
give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. When used in this report,
the words anticipate, believe,
estimate, expect, may, and similar expressions, as
they relate to the Company and our management, identify forward-looking statements. The actual
results of future events described in such forward-looking statements could differ materially from
the results described in the forward-looking statements due to the risks and uncertainties set
forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2005 and elsewhere within
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
16
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, the Company is a party to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. The Company is not currently a party to any litigation that it believes could have a
material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The following documents are filed as exhibits to this Report:
31.1 Certification of Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
31.2 Certification of Michael A. Pugh, Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief
Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act, as amended.
32.1 Certification of Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, under Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S.C. 1350.
32.2 Certification of Michael A. Pugh, Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief
Financial Officer, under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S.C. 1350.
17
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC. |
||||
Date: December 13, 2005 | /s/ Michael A. Pugh | |||
Michael A. Pugh | ||||
Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Authorized Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
18
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
31.1
|
- | Certification of Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. | ||
31.2
|
- | Certification of Michael A. Pugh, Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. | ||
32.1
|
- | Certification of Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S.C. 1350. | ||
32.2
|
- | Certification of Michael A. Pugh, Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer, under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S.C. 1350. |