MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA INC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
Commission File No. 001-33861
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New York | 11-2153962 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
2929 California Street, Torrance, California | 90503 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | Zip Code |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (310) 212-7910
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No
þ
There were 11,996,021 shares of Common Stock outstanding at November 3, 2009.
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC.
GLOSSARY
The following terms are frequently used in the text of this report and have the meanings indicated
below.
Used Core An alternator or starter which has been used in the operation of a vehicle.
Generally, the Used Core is an original equipment (OE) alternator or starter installed by the
vehicle manufacturer and subsequently removed for replacement. Used Cores contain salvageable parts
which are an important raw material in the remanufacturing process. We obtain most Used Cores by
providing credits to our customers for Used Cores returned to us under our core exchange program.
Our customers receive these Used Cores from consumers who deliver a Used Core to obtain credit from
our customers upon the purchase of a newly remanufactured alternator or starter. When sufficient
Used Cores cannot be obtained from our customers, we will purchase Used Cores from core brokers,
who are in the business of buying and selling Used Cores. The Used Cores purchased from core
brokers or returned to us by our customers under the core exchange program, and which have been
physically received by us, are part of our raw material or work in process inventory included in
long-term core inventory.
Remanufactured Core The Used Core underlying an alternator or starter that has gone through the
remanufacturing process and through that process has become part of a newly remanufactured
alternator or starter. The remanufacturing process takes a Used Core, breaks it down into its
component parts, replaces those components that cannot be reused and reassembles the salvageable
components of the Used Core and additional new components into a remanufactured alternator or
starter. Remanufactured Cores are included in our on-hand finished goods inventory and in the
remanufactured finished good product held for sale at customer locations. Used Cores returned by
consumers to our customers but not yet returned to us continue to be classified as Remanufactured
Cores until we physically receive these Used Cores. All Remanufactured Cores are included in our
long-term core inventory or in our long-term core inventory deposit.
3
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 1,633,000 | $ | 452,000 | ||||
Short-term investments |
390,000 | 335,000 | ||||||
Accounts receivable net |
12,509,000 | 11,121,000 | ||||||
Inventory net |
27,785,000 | 27,923,000 | ||||||
Inventory unreturned |
4,269,000 | 4,708,000 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
8,280,000 | 8,277,000 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,573,000 | 1,355,000 | ||||||
Total current assets |
56,439,000 | 54,171,000 | ||||||
Plant and equipment net |
13,289,000 | 13,997,000 | ||||||
Long-term core inventory |
63,993,000 | 62,821,000 | ||||||
Long-term core inventory deposit |
25,768,000 | 24,451,000 | ||||||
Long-term deferred income taxes |
480,000 | 989,000 | ||||||
Intangible assets net |
6,690,000 | 2,564,000 | ||||||
Other assets |
512,000 | 595,000 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 167,171,000 | $ | 159,588,000 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 29,635,000 | $ | 24,507,000 | ||||
Note payable |
133,000 | 722,000 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
1,513,000 | 1,451,000 | ||||||
Accrued salaries and wages |
2,365,000 | 3,162,000 | ||||||
Accrued workers compensation claims |
1,600,000 | 1,895,000 | ||||||
Income tax payable |
909,000 | 1,158,000 | ||||||
Line of credit |
23,700,000 | 21,600,000 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
597,000 | 1,624,000 | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
1,577,000 | 1,621,000 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
62,029,000 | 57,740,000 | ||||||
Deferred core revenue |
5,509,000 | 5,934,000 | ||||||
Deferred gain on sale-leaseback |
581,000 | 843,000 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
713,000 | 587,000 | ||||||
Capitalized lease obligations, less current portion |
637,000 | 1,401,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
69,469,000 | 66,505,000 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock; par value $.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
| | ||||||
Series A junior participating preferred stock; par value $.01 per share,
20,000 shares authorized; none issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock; par value $.01 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized;
11,996,021 and 11,962,021 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009
and March 31, 2009, respectively |
120,000 | 120,000 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
92,680,000 | 92,459,000 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital-warrant |
1,879,000 | 1,879,000 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(2,216,000 | ) | (1,984,000 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
5,239,000 | 609,000 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
97,702,000 | 93,083,000 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 167,171,000 | $ | 159,588,000 | ||||
The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.
4
Table of Contents
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 72,127,000 | $ | 69,142,000 | $ | 39,437,000 | $ | 36,437,000 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
54,140,000 | 45,756,000 | 28,621,000 | 24,531,000 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
17,987,000 | 23,386,000 | 10,816,000 | 11,906,000 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
6,165,000 | 9,174,000 | 3,653,000 | 4,972,000 | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
2,807,000 | 2,356,000 | 1,535,000 | 1,344,000 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
668,000 | 1,043,000 | 334,000 | 581,000 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
9,640,000 | 12,573,000 | 5,522,000 | 6,897,000 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
8,347,000 | 10,813,000 | 5,294,000 | 5,009,000 | ||||||||||||
Other expense (income): |
||||||||||||||||
Gain on acquisition |
(1,331,000 | ) | | (1,331,000 | ) | | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,970,000 | 1,984,000 | 974,000 | 1,152,000 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
| (18,000 | ) | | (4,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before income tax expense |
7,708,000 | 8,847,000 | 5,651,000 | 3,861,000 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
3,078,000 | 3,495,000 | 2,216,000 | 1,541,000 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,630,000 | $ | 5,352,000 | $ | 3,435,000 | $ | 2,320,000 | ||||||||
Basic net income per share |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.19 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.19 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
11,967,797 | 12,029,039 | 11,973,510 | 11,987,975 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
12,086,298 | 12,158,376 | 12,101,997 | 12,130,280 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.
5
Table of Contents
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,630,000 | $ | 5,352,000 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,604,000 | 1,561,000 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
258,000 | 92,000 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred gain on sale-leaseback |
(262,000 | ) | (259,000 | ) | ||||
Provision for (recovery of) inventory reserves |
606,000 | (285,000 | ) | |||||
Provision for customer payment discrepancies |
186,000 | 240,000 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
| 224,000 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
587,000 | (163,000 | ) | |||||
Share-based compensation expense |
98,000 | 385,000 | ||||||
Gain on acquisition |
(1,331,000 | ) | | |||||
Impact of tax benefit on APIC pool |
36,000 | | ||||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
5,000 | | ||||||
Changes in current assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(2,697,000 | ) | (11,216,000 | ) | ||||
Inventory |
(131,000 | ) | 5,276,000 | |||||
Inventory unreturned |
439,000 | 219,000 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(166,000 | ) | 424,000 | |||||
Other assets |
116,000 | 374,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
3,436,000 | (7,653,000 | ) | |||||
Income tax payable |
(297,000 | ) | 1,899,000 | |||||
Deferred core revenue |
(425,000 | ) | 1,054,000 | |||||
Long-term accounts receivable |
| 767,000 | ||||||
Long-term core inventory |
(1,503,000 | ) | (7,909,000 | ) | ||||
Long-term core inventory deposits |
(1,317,000 | ) | (844,000 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities |
(1,147,000 | ) | (109,000 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
2,725,000 | (10,571,000 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of plant and equipment |
(484,000 | ) | (1,232,000 | ) | ||||
Purchase of businesses |
(2,489,000 | ) | (6,891,000 | ) | ||||
Change in short term investments |
37,000 | (37,000 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,936,000 | ) | (8,160,000 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Borrowings under line of credit |
20,000,000 | 28,310,000 | ||||||
Repayments under line of credit |
(17,900,000 | ) | (10,760,000 | ) | ||||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
(814,000 | ) | (904,000 | ) | ||||
Exercise of stock options |
123,000 | | ||||||
Impact of tax benefit on APIC pool |
(36,000 | ) | | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
1,373,000 | 16,646,000 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
19,000 | 279,000 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
1,181,000 | (1,806,000 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of period |
452,000 | 1,935,000 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents End of period |
$ | 1,633,000 | $ | 129,000 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 1,915,000 | $ | 1,849,000 | ||||
Income taxes |
2,650,000 | 1,638,000 | ||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Settlement of accounts receivable in connection with the purchase of business |
$ | 1,123,000 | $ | | ||||
Property acquired under capital lease |
| 357,000 | ||||||
Holdback on purchase of businesses |
| 800,000 | ||||||
Note payable on purchase of business |
| 1,293,000 | ||||||
Retirement of common stock in satisfaction of shareholder note receivable |
| 682,000 |
The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.
6
Table of Contents
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with
the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the six and three months ended September 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending March 31,
2010. This report should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, which are included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
June 15, 2009.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a consistent basis with,
and there have been no material changes to, the accounting policies described in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements that are presented in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.
1. Company Background and Organization
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company or MPA) remanufacture and
distribute alternators and starters for imported and domestic cars and light trucks. These
replacement parts are sold for use on vehicles after initial vehicle purchase. These automotive
parts are sold to automotive retail chain stores and warehouse distributors throughout the United
States and Canada and to a major automobile manufacturer.
The Company obtains used alternators and starters, commonly known as Used Cores, primarily from its
customers as trade-ins. It also purchases Used Cores from vendors (core brokers). The customers
grant credit to the consumer when the used part is returned to them, and the Company in turn
provides a credit to the customers upon return to the Company. These Used Cores are an essential
material needed for the remanufacturing operations. The Company has remanufacturing, warehousing
and shipping/receiving operations for alternators and starters in Mexico, California, Singapore and
Malaysia. In addition, the Company utilizes third party warehouse distribution centers in Edison,
New Jersey and Springfield, Oregon.
The Company operates in one business segment pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 280, Segment Reporting.
2. Acquisitions
On August 14, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Reliance Automotive,
Inc. (Reliance), a privately held remanufacturer of alternators and starters based in East
Berlin, Connecticut. These products are sold under the Reliance brand name. The acquisition was
consummated pursuant to a definitive purchase agreement dated August 14, 2009. The Company believes
the acquisition of Reliance continues an acquisition strategy designed to further enhance the
Companys market share in North America, including the addition of a major automotive retail
customer.
The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The estimated fair value of the net assets acquired
exceeded the fair value of the consideration transferred of $3,023,000. After reassessing the
identification of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the $1,331,000 excess of the fair value
of the net assets acquired over the purchase price was recorded as a gain on acquisition in the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations during the six and three months ended September 30,
2009. The tax impact of the gain on acquisition of $544,000 is included as a reduction to long-term
deferred income tax assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2009. Acquisition
related costs for
7
Table of Contents
the six months ended September 30, 2009 of $191,000 are included in general and administrative
expenses in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations. Pro forma information is not
presented as the assets, results of operations and purchase price of Reliance were not significant
to the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
The following table reflects the allocation of the purchase price:
Consideration | ||||
Cash consideration |
$ | 1,900,000 | ||
Settlement of accounts receivable |
1,123,000 | |||
Total |
$ | 3,023,000 | ||
Purchase price allocation |
||||
Plant and equipment |
$ | 145,000 | ||
Trademarks |
185,000 | |||
Customer relationships |
4,053,000 | |||
Non-compete agreements |
146,000 | |||
Current liabilities |
(175,000 | ) | ||
Fair value of net assets acquired |
4,354,000 | |||
Gain on acquisition |
$ | (1,331,000 | ) | |
On May 16, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Automotive Importing
Manufacturing, Inc. (AIM), specifically its operation which produced new and remanufactured
alternators and starters for imported and domestic passenger vehicles. These products are sold
under Talon®, Xtreme® and other brand names. The acquisition was consummated pursuant to a
definitive purchase agreement, dated April 24, 2008.
The acquisition of AIM expanded the Companys customer base and product line, including the
addition of business in heavy duty alternator and starter applications. The following table
reflects the final allocation of the purchase price:
Consideration and acquisition costs | ||||
Cash consideration |
$ | 3,727,000 | ||
Purchase price hold back |
500,000 | |||
Acquisition costs |
437,000 | |||
Total |
$ | 4,664,000 | ||
Purchase price allocation |
||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances |
$ | (221,000 | ) | |
Inventory |
2,853,000 | |||
Trademarks |
212,000 | |||
Customer relationships |
1,441,000 | |||
Non-compete agreements |
50,000 | |||
Goodwill |
329,000 | |||
Total purchase price |
$ | 4,664,000 | ||
The definitive purchase agreement was amended on May 16, 2008. The amendment provided for an
additional contingent consideration of up to $400,000 to AIM if the net sales to certain customers
exceed an agreed upon dollar threshold during the period June 1, 2008 to May 31, 2009. The net
sales to these customers did not exceed the
agreed upon threshold and the Company does not expect to make any additional payments under this
definitive purchase agreement.
On August 22, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Suncoast Automotive
Products, Inc. (SCP), specifically its operation which produced new and remanufactured
alternators and starters for the
8
Table of Contents
automotive, industrial and heavy duty after-markets. These
products were sold under the SCP brand name. The acquisition was consummated pursuant to an asset
purchase agreement, dated August 13, 2008.
The acquisition of SCP enhanced the Companys market share in North America. Pro forma information
is not presented as the assets, results of operations and purchase price of SCP were not
significant to the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations, individually
or in the aggregate with the acquisition of AIM.
The following table reflects the final allocation of the purchase price:
Consideration and acquisition costs | ||||
Cash consideration |
$ | 2,448,000 | ||
Purchase price hold back |
300,000 | |||
Note payable |
1,293,000 | |||
Acquisition costs |
279,000 | |||
Total |
$ | 4,320,000 | ||
Purchase price allocation |
||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances |
$ | (95,000 | ) | |
Inventory |
1,366,000 | |||
Trademarks |
156,000 | |||
Customer relationships |
970,000 | |||
Non-compete agreements |
61,000 | |||
Goodwill |
1,862,000 | |||
Total purchase price |
$ | 4,320,000 | ||
The note payable to SCP of $1,293,000 bears interest at prime plus 1% and is payable in
monthly installments of $100,000 beginning in October 2008. During the six months ended September
30, 2009, principal and interest of $589,000 and $11,000, respectively, was paid on the note
payable to SCP.
The results of operations of certain assets acquired from Reliance, AIM, and SCP are included in
the Consolidated Statement of Operations from their respective acquisition dates.
3. Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of the Companys intangible assets at September 30, 2009 and March 31,
2009.
September 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||
Period | Value | Amortization | Value | Amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization | ||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks |
5 - 15 years | $ | 553,000 | $ | 78,000 | $ | 368,000 | $ | 45,000 | |||||||||||
Customer relationships |
5 - 15 years | 6,464,000 | 475,000 | 2,411,000 | 265,000 | |||||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
5 years | 257,000 | 31,000 | 111,000 | 16,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,274,000 | $ | 584,000 | $ | 2,890,000 | $ | 326,000 | ||||||||||||
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $258,000 and $92,000 during the six
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible
assets was $151,000 and $62,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The aggregate estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets is as
follows:
9
Table of Contents
Year ending March 31, | ||||
2010 remaining six months |
$ | 387,000 | ||
2011 |
774,000 | |||
2012 |
774,000 | |||
2013 |
774,000 | |||
2014 |
738,000 | |||
Thereafter |
3,243,000 | |||
Total |
$ | 6,690,000 | ||
4. Accounts Receivable Net
Included in accounts receivable net are significant offset accounts related to customer
allowances earned, customer payment discrepancies, in-transit and estimated future unit returns,
estimated future credits to be provided for Used Cores returned by the customers and potential bad
debts. Due to the forward looking nature and the different aging periods of certain estimated
offset accounts, they may not, at any point in time, directly relate to the balances in the open
trade accounts receivable.
Accounts receivable net is comprised of the following:
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
Accounts receivable trade |
$ | 45,863,000 | $ | 40,126,000 | ||||
Allowance for bad debts |
(243,000 | ) | (243,000 | ) | ||||
Customer allowances earned |
(6,180,000 | ) | (5,109,000 | ) | ||||
Customer payment discrepancies |
(901,000 | ) | (681,000 | ) | ||||
Customer finished goods returns accruals |
(10,430,000 | ) | (10,097,000 | ) | ||||
Customer core returns accruals |
(15,600,000 | ) | (12,875,000 | ) | ||||
Less: total accounts receivable offset accounts |
(33,354,000 | ) | (29,005,000 | ) | ||||
Total accounts receivable net |
$ | 12,509,000 | $ | 11,121,000 | ||||
Warranty Returns
The Company allows its customers to return goods to the Company that their end-user customers have
returned to them, whether the returned item is or is not defective (warranty returns). The Company
accrues an estimate of its exposure to warranty returns based on a historical analysis of the level
of this type of return as a percentage of total unit sales. Amounts charged to expense for these
warranty returns are considered in arriving at the Companys net sales. The warranty return accrual
is included under the customer finished goods returns accruals in the above table.
Change in the Companys warranty return accrual is as follows:
Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | (2,596,000 | ) | $ | (2,824,000 | ) | $ | (2,604,000 | ) | $ | (3,309,000 | ) | ||||
Charged to expense |
18,406,000 | 16,420,000 | 10,211,000 | 8,457,000 | ||||||||||||
Amounts processed |
(17,863,000 | ) | (16,135,000 | ) | (9,676,000 | ) | (8,657,000 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | (3,139,000 | ) | $ | (3,109,000 | ) | $ | (3,139,000 | ) | $ | (3,109,000 | ) | ||||
10
Table of Contents
5. Inventory
Inventory includes non-core inventory, inventory unreturned, long-term core inventory, long-term
core inventory deposit and is comprised of the following:
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
Non-core inventory |
||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 10,434,000 | $ | 9,810,000 | ||||
Work-in-process |
83,000 | 56,000 | ||||||
Finished goods |
19,030,000 | 19,643,000 | ||||||
29,547,000 | 29,509,000 | |||||||
Less: allowance for excess and obsolete inventory |
(1,762,000 | ) | (1,586,000 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 27,785,000 | $ | 27,923,000 | ||||
Inventory unreturned |
$ | 4,269,000 | $ | 4,708,000 | ||||
Long-term core inventory |
||||||||
Used cores held at companys facilities |
$ | 17,646,000 | $ | 17,580,000 | ||||
Used cores expected to be returned by customers |
4,916,000 | 2,799,000 | ||||||
Remanufactured cores held in finished goods |
14,162,000 | 15,536,000 | ||||||
Remanufactured cores held at customers locations |
28,195,000 | 27,501,000 | ||||||
64,919,000 | 63,416,000 | |||||||
Less: allowance for excess and obsolete inventory |
(926,000 | ) | (595,000 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 63,993,000 | $ | 62,821,000 | ||||
Long-term core inventory deposit |
$ | 25,768,000 | $ | 24,451,000 | ||||
6. Major Customers
The Companys four largest customers accounted for the following total percentage of net sales and
accounts receivable:
Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
Sales | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Customer A |
44 | % | 48 | % | 42 | % | 50 | % | ||||||||
Customer B (1) |
26 | % | 23 | % | 28 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||
Customer C |
8 | % | 11 | % | 9 | % | 10 | % | ||||||||
Customer D |
8 | % | 10 | % | 7 | % | 9 | % |
Accounts Receivable | September 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | ||||||
Customer A |
19 | % | 18 | % | ||||
Customer B (1) |
50 | % | 47 | % | ||||
Customer C |
16 | % | 25 | % | ||||
Customer D |
2 | % | 3 | % |
(1) | One of the Companys largest customers was acquired by another of the Companys largest customers. Therefore, the percentage of net sales for the six and three months ended September 30, 2008 and the percentage of accounts receivable as of March 31, 2009 attributable to Customer B include the combined net sales and accounts receivable of these customers. |
11
Table of Contents
For the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, one supplier provided approximately 30% and
23%, respectively, of the raw materials purchased. For the three months ended September 30, 2009,
one supplier provided approximately 33% of the raw materials purchased. For the three months ended
September 30, 2008, two suppliers provided approximately 20% and 12%, respectively, of the raw
materials purchased. No other supplier accounted for more than 10% of the Companys raw materials
purchases for the six and three months ended September 30, 2009 or 2008.
7. Line of Credit; Factoring Agreements
The Companys amended and restated credit agreement, as amended, with its bank and in effect at
September 30, 2009 (the Credit Agreement) continued to provide the Company with a revolving loan
(the Revolving Loan) of up to $40,000,000, including obligations under outstanding letters of
credit. The Credit Agreement, among other things, allowed the Company to borrow under the Revolving
Loan for the purpose of consummating certain permitted acquisitions.
In June 2009, the Company entered into a sixth amendment to the Credit Agreement with its bank.
This amendment, among other things: (i) created a borrowing reserve in the amount of $7,500,000
reserved by the Companys bank against the Companys Revolving Loan commitment amount and available
in the event the receivables from the Companys largest customer were no longer factored, and (ii)
amended certain financial covenants, including the Companys leverage ratio and EBITDA covenants.
In August 2009, the Company entered into a seventh amendment to the Credit Agreement with its bank.
This amendment, among other things, extended the expiration date of the credit facility to July 13,
2010.
The bank holds a security interest in substantially all of the Companys assets. The balance of the
Revolving Loan was $23,700,000 and $21,600,000 at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
respectively. Additionally, the Company had reserved $2,201,000 of the Revolving Loan for standby
letters of credit for workers compensation insurance and $221,000 reserved for commercial letters
of credit as of September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, $13,878,000 was available under the
Revolving Loan, and of this, $7,500,000 was reserved for use in the event the Companys largest
customer discontinued its current practice of having the Companys receivables factored.
The Credit Agreement, among other things, continued to require the Company to maintain certain
financial covenants, including cash flow, fixed charge coverage ratio and leverage ratio and a
number of restrictive covenants, including limits on capital expenditures and operating leases,
prohibitions against additional indebtedness, payment of dividends, pledge of assets and loans to
officers and/or affiliates. In addition, it was an event of default under the Credit Agreement if
Selwyn Joffe was no longer the Companys CEO.
The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit Agreement as of
September 30, 2009.
In October 2009, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the New
Credit Agreement), with its bank and one additional lender. The New Credit Agreement replaces the
Credit Agreement. See Note 14.
The Company has established receivable discount programs with certain customers and their
respective banks. Under these programs, the Company may sell those customers receivables to those
banks at a discount to be agreed upon at the time the receivables are sold. These discount
arrangements have allowed the Company to accelerate collection of customer receivables aggregating
$31,113,000 and $36,768,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, by
an average of 313 days and 314 days, respectively. On an annualized basis, the weighted average
discount rate on the receivables sold to the banks during the six months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 was 5.1% and 4.8%, respectively. The amount of the discount on these receivables,
$1,389,000 and $1,421,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, was
recorded as interest expense. In September 2009, one of these customers reinstated the use of its
receivable discount program which had been previously suspended in May 2008.
12
Table of Contents
8. Stock Options and Share-Based Payments
The Company accounts for stock options and share-based payments in accordance with FASB ASC 718,
Compensation-Stock Compensation. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $98,000
and $385,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company
granted 6,000 and 50,000 stock options during the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
At September 30, 2009, there was $66,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense from
stock-based compensation granted under the plans, which is related to unvested shares. The
compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.0
year.
9. Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share includes the
effect, if any, from the potential exercise or conversion of securities, such as stock options and
warrants, which would result in the issuance of incremental shares of common stock.
The following presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted net income per share.
Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,630,000 | $ | 5,352,000 | $ | 3,435,000 | $ | 2,320,000 | ||||||||
Basic shares |
11,967,797 | 12,029,039 | 11,973,510 | 11,987,975 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive
stock options and
warrants |
118,501 | 129,337 | 128,487 | 142,305 | ||||||||||||
Diluted shares |
12,086,298 | 12,158,376 | 12,101,997 | 12,130,280 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.19 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.19 | ||||||||
The effect of dilutive options and warrants excludes 1,256,649 shares subject to options and
546,283 shares subject to warrants with exercise prices ranging from $4.60 to $15.00 per share for
the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 1,248,316 shares subject to options and 546,283 shares
subject to warrants with exercise prices ranging from $5.00 to $15.00 per share for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 all of which were anti-dilutive. The effect of dilutive options
and warrants excludes 1,124,400 shares subject to options and 546,283 shares subject to warrants
with exercise prices ranging from $7.27 to $18.38 per share for the six and three months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively all of which were anti-dilutive.
10. Comprehensive Income
FASB ASC 220, Comprehensive Income establishes standards for the reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general purpose financial statements.
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity during a period resulting from transactions
and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Companys total comprehensive income
consists of net income, unrealized gain on short-term investments and foreign currency translation
adjustments.
13
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,630,000 | $ | 5,352,000 | $ | 3,435,000 | $ | 2,320,000 | ||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on short-term investments |
55,000 | (33,000 | ) | 26,000 | (39,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
(287,000 | ) | 121,000 | (280,000 | ) | (188,000 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive net income |
$ | 4,398,000 | $ | 5,440,000 | $ | 3,181,000 | $ | 2,093,000 | ||||||||
11. Income Taxes
Income tax expenses for the six and three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 reflect income
tax rates higher than the federal statutory rates primarily due to state income taxes, which were
partially offset by the benefit of lower statutory tax rates in foreign taxing jurisdictions. At
March 31, 2009, the Company had no federal net operating loss carryforwards. As a result, the
Companys cash flow for the six months ended September 30, 2009 was impacted by the fact that there
were no net operating loss carryforwards available. The Companys cash flows in future periods will
be impacted by the unavailability of net operating loss carryforwards.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and
various state and foreign jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The Company is no
longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax
authorities for fiscal years prior to fiscal 2005 unless subsequent audit results allow the
examination of specific issues in earlier fiscal periods. The Internal Revenue Service currently
has an ongoing tax examination of the federal tax returns for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.
The opening meeting was held on September 15, 2009. The manner in which each tax position will be
resolved and the amount of potential changes in the Companys
tax liabilities from the examination are
uncertain.
12. Financial Risk Management and Derivatives
Purchases and expenses denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, which are primarily
related to the Companys production facilities overseas, expose the Company to market risk from
material movements in foreign exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the foreign currency. The
Companys primary risk exposure is from changes in the rate between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican
peso related to the operation of the Companys facility in Mexico. The Company enters into forward
foreign currency exchange contracts to exchange U.S. dollars for Mexican pesos in order to mitigate
this risk. The extent to which forward foreign currency exchange contracts are used is modified
periodically in response to managements estimate of market conditions and the terms and length of
specific purchase requirements to fund those overseas facilities.
The Company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts in order to reduce the impact
of foreign currency fluctuations and not to engage in currency speculation. The use of derivative
financial instruments allows the Company to reduce its exposure to the risk that the eventual cash
outflow resulting from funding the expenses of the foreign operations will be materially affected
by changes in exchange rates. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading
purposes. The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are designated for forecasted expenditure
requirements to fund the foreign operations.
The Company had forward foreign currency exchange contracts with a U.S. dollar equivalent notional
value of $6,449,000 and $7,224,000 at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively. The
forward foreign currency exchange contracts entered into require the Company to exchange Mexican
pesos for U.S. dollars. These contracts generally expire in a year or less, at rates agreed at the
inception of the contracts. The counterparty to this derivative transaction is a major financial
institution with investment grade or better credit rating; however, the Company is exposed to
credit risk with this institution. The credit risk is limited to the potential unrealized gains
(which offset currency fluctuations adverse to the Company) in any such contract should this
counterparty fail to perform as contracted. Any changes in the fair values of forward foreign
currency exchange contracts are reflected in current period earnings and accounted for as an
increase or offset to general and administrative expenses.
14
Table of Contents
The following table shows the effect of the Companys derivatives instruments on its Consolidated
Statement of Operations:
Amount of Gain | ||||||||||||
Location of Gain | Recognized in Income on Derivative | |||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging | Recognized in Income | Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||
Instruments under Statement 133 | on Derivative | September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||||
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
General and administrative expenses | $ | (1,103,000 | ) | $ | (139,000 | ) |
The fair value of the forward foreign currency exchange contracts of $55,000 is included in
prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2009.
The fair value of the forward foreign currency exchange contracts of $1,048,000 is included in
other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2009.
13. Fair Value Measurements
The following table summarizes the Companys financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value, by level within the fair value hierarchy of FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009:
September 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Using Inputs Considered as | Using Inputs Considered as | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | 390,000 | $ | 390,000 | | | $ | 335,000 | $ | 335,000 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
55,000 | | $ | 55,000 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation |
390,000 | 390,000 | | | 335,000 | 335,000 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
| | | | 1,048,000 | | $ | 1,048,000 | |
The Companys short-term investments, which fund its deferred compensation liabilities,
consist of investments in mutual funds. These investments are classified as Level 1 as the shares
of these mutual funds trade with sufficient frequency and volume to enable the Company to obtain
pricing information on an ongoing basis.
The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are primarily measured based on the foreign
currency spot and forward rates quoted by the banks or foreign currency dealers. During the six
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, ($1,103,000) and $357,000, respectively, in general and
administrative expenses were recorded due to the change in the value of the forward foreign
currency exchange contracts subsequent to entering into the contracts. During the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, ($139,000) and $560,000, respectively, in general and
administrative expenses were recorded due to the change in the value of the forward foreign
currency exchange contracts subsequent to entering into the contracts.
Disclosures for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, but are
recognized and disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, were required prospectively
beginning April 1, 2009. During the six and three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company had
no significant measurements of assets or liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
subsequent to their initial recognition.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature
of these instruments. The carrying amounts of the line of credit and other long-term liabilities
approximate their fair value based on current rates for instruments with similar characteristics.
15
Table of Contents
14. Subsequent Events
The
Company has completed an evaluation of all subsequent events through
November 6, 2009, the date
of issuance of its financial statements, and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that
would require recognition in the Companys consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements, except as discussed below.
On October 28, 2009, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the New
Credit Agreement), with its bank and one additional lender (the Lenders), which permits the
Company to borrow up to $45,000,000 (the New Credit Facility). The New Credit Facility, among
other things, provides the Company with a revolving loan (the Revolving Loan) of up to
$35,000,000, including obligations under outstanding letters of credit and a borrowing reserve in
the amount of $7,500,000 to be reserved by the Lenders against the Companys Revolving Loan
commitment amount and this borrowing reserve becomes available in the event the receivables from
the Companys largest customer are no longer factored, and a term loan (the Term Loan) in the
principal amount of $10,000,000.
The Revolving Loan and the Term Loan bear interest at the banks reference rate, plus an applicable
margin, or a LIBOR rate, plus an applicable margin, as selected by the Company in accordance with
the New Credit Agreement. In addition, the New Credit Agreement, among other things, requires the
Company to maintain certain financial covenants, including tangible net worth, fixed charge
coverage ratio and leverage ratio covenants.
The Term Loan matures in October 2014 and requires principal payments of $500,000 on a quarterly
basis. The first quarterly payment is due on January 4, 2010. The Revolving Loan expires in October
2011 and provides the Company the option to request up to three one-year extensions.
15. New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2009, the FASB established standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued that are included in FASB
ASC 855, Subsequent Events (FASB ASC 855). Entities are required to disclose the date through
which subsequent events have been evaluated and the basis for that date. FASB ASC 855 is effective
on a prospective basis for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of
this standard on June 30, 2009 did not have any material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment to SFAS No. 140 (SFAS No. 166). SFAS No. 166 eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires
additional disclosures in order to enhance information reported to users of financial statements by
providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets, including securitization
transactions, and an entitys continuing involvement in and exposure to the risks related to
transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first
fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS
No. 166 on April 1, 2010 to have any material impact on its consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No.
167). This statement amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities
and is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after November
15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 167 on April 1, 2010 to have any
material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB approved the FASB ASC as the single source of authoritative, nongovernmental
GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included
in the ASC has become non-authoritative. The ASC is effective for financial statements for interim
or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company began to use the new
guidelines and numbering system prescribed by the ASC when referring to GAAP during the second
quarter of fiscal 2010. As the ASC was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it did not
have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
16
Table of Contents
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-05, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This update
provides clarification for the fair value measurement of liabilities in circumstances in which a
quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available. This update is
effective for the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after issuance. The
Company does not expect the adoption of this update on October 1, 2009 to have any material impact
on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
17
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis presents factors that Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (our, we, or us) believe are relevant to an assessment and understanding of our
consolidated financial position and results of operations. This financial and business analysis
should be read in conjunction with our March 31, 2009 audited consolidated financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 15, 2009.
Disclosure Regarding Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This report contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to our future performance that
involve risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to differ materially
from those projected in such statements. These factors include, but are not limited to:
concentration of sales to certain customers, changes in our relationship with any of our customers,
the increasing customer pressure for lower prices and more favorable payment and other terms, the
increasing demands on our working capital, the significant strain on working capital associated
with large Remanufactured Core inventory purchases from customers, our ability to obtain any
additional financing we may seek or require, our ability to achieve positive cash flows from
operations, potential future changes in our previously reported results as a result of the
identification and correction of errors in our accounting policies or procedures or the potential
material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting, lower revenues than
anticipated from new and existing contracts, our failure to meet the financial covenants or the
other obligations set forth in our bank credit agreement and the banks refusal to waive any such
defaults, any meaningful difference between projected production needs and ultimate sales to our
customers, increases in interest rates, changes in the financial condition of any of our major
customers, the impact of high gasoline prices, the potential for changes in consumer spending,
consumer preferences and general economic conditions, increased competition in the automotive parts
industry, including increased competition from Chinese and other offshore manufacturers, difficulty
in obtaining Used Cores and component parts or increases in the costs of those parts, political,
criminal or economic instability in any of the foreign countries where we conduct operations,
currency exchange fluctuations, unforeseen increases in operating costs and other factors discussed
herein and in our other filings with the SEC.
Management Overview
We remanufacture alternators and starters for import and domestic cars and light trucks in addition
to heavy duty, agricultural and industrial applications and distribute them predominantly
throughout the United States and Canada. Our business for heavy duty, agricultural and industrial
applications is in its early stages and does not represent a significant portion of our business.
Our line of light duty alternators and starters are sold to most of the largest auto parts retail
chains in the United States and Canada, and various traditional warehouses for the professional
installers. We believe that demand and replacement rates for after-market remanufactured
alternators and starters generally increase with increases in miles driven and the age of vehicles.
Historically, our business has focused on the do-it-yourself (DIY) market, customers who buy
remanufactured alternators and starters at an auto parts store and install the parts themselves. We
believe that the do-it-for-me (DIFM) market, also known as the professional installer market, is
an attractive opportunity for growth. We believe we are positioned to benefit from this market
opportunity in two ways: (1) our auto parts retail customers are expanding their efforts to target
the professional installer market segment and (2) we sell our products under private label and our
Quality-Built®, Talon®, Xtreme®, and other brand names directly to suppliers that focus on
professional installers. In addition, we sell our products to an original equipment manufacturer
for distribution to the professional installer both for warranty replacement and their general
after-market channels.
In August 2009, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Reliance Automotive, Inc.
(Reliance), a privately held remanufacturer of alternators and starters based in East Berlin,
Connecticut. These products are sold under the Reliance brand name. We believe the acquisition of
Reliance continues our acquisition strategy designed to further enhance our market share in North
America, including the addition of a major automotive retail customer.
18
Table of Contents
We operate in one business segment pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 280,
Segment Reporting.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.
The following table summarizes certain key operating data for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Gross profit
percentage |
27.4 | % | 32.7 | % | ||||
Cash flow used in operations |
$ | (245,000 | ) | $ | (3,229,000 | ) | ||
Finished goods turnover (annualized) (1) |
5.9 | 4.2 | ||||||
Annualized return on equity (2) |
14.8 | % | 10.2 | % |
(1) | Annualized finished goods turnover for the fiscal quarter is calculated by multiplying cost of sales for the quarter by 4 and dividing the result by the average between beginning and ending non-core finished goods inventory values for the fiscal quarter. We believe this provides a useful measure of our ability to turn production into revenues. | |
(2) | Annualized return on equity is computed as net income for the fiscal quarter multiplied by 4 and dividing the result by beginning shareholders equity. Annualized return on equity measures our ability to invest shareholders funds profitably. |
Following is our unaudited results of operations, reflected as a percentage of net sales:
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||
September 30, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Cost of goods sold |
72.6 | 67.3 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
27.4 | 32.7 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||||
General and administrative |
9.3 | 13.6 | |||||||||
Sales and marketing |
3.9 | 3.7 | |||||||||
Research and development |
0.8 | 1.6 | |||||||||
Operating income |
13.4 | 13.8 | |||||||||
Gain on acquisition |
(3.4 | ) | | ||||||||
Interest expense net of interest income |
2.5 | 3.2 | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
5.6 | 4.2 | |||||||||
Net income |
8.7 | % | 6.4 | % | |||||||
Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2009 increased by $3,000,000, to
$39,437,000 compared to net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 of $36,437,000.
This increase was primarily due to net sales to new customers acquired as a result of our
acquisition of certain assets of Reliance and increases in
net sales to our other existing and new customers. In addition, our net sales for three months
ended September 30, 2009 was positively impacted by the recognition of $845,000 of previously
deferred core revenue. We have recognized this revenue because we do not expect to incur any
additional sales incentive allowances associated with Remanufactured Core buybacks from this
customer.
19
Table of Contents
Cost of Goods Sold/Gross Profit. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales increased during
the three months ended September 30, 2009 to 72.6% from 67.3% for the three months ended September
30, 2008, resulting in a corresponding decrease in our gross profit of 5.3% to 27.4% for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 from 32.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The
decrease in the gross profit percentage, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008,
was primarily due to (i) an increase in packaging costs of $506,000 reflecting increased sales
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008, (ii) a reduction in scrap metal prices that
resulted in a decrease in revenue of $460,000 for our scrap metal compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2008, and (iii) an increase in the provision for inventory reserves of $807,000
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008, which offset lower manufacturing costs
compared to the prior year.
General and Administrative. Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 were $3,653,000, which represents a decrease of $1,319,000, or 26.5%, from
general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 of $4,972,000.
This decrease in general and administrative expenses during the three months ended September 30,
2009 was primarily due to the following: (i) a net gain of $699,000 recorded due to the changes in
the fair value of foreign exchange contracts, (ii) $179,000 of decreased professional services
fees, (iii) $115,000 of decreased stock-based compensation, (iv) $87,000 of decreased general and
administrative expenses at our offshore manufacturing facilities, and (v) $48,000 of decreased
travel expense.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2009
increased $191,000, or 14.2%, to $1,535,000 from $1,344,000 for the three months ended September
30, 2008. This increase was due primarily to the addition of employees as a result of our
acquisition of certain assets of Reliance, and increased catalog expense.
Research and Development. Our research and development expenses decreased by $247,000, or 42.5%, to
$334,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $581,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The decrease in research and development expense was due primarily to lower
consulting fees, compensation and travel.
Gain on acquisition. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded a gain of
$1,331,000 in connection with the acquisition of certain assets of Reliance as the estimated fair value of the net
assets acquired exceeded the fair value of the consideration transferred.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense, net of interest income, for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 was $974,000. This represents a decrease of $174,000, or 15.2%, over interest
expense, net of interest income, of $1,148,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This
decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in factored receivables and lower interest rates
on our line of credit balance, partially offset by higher average outstanding balances on our line
of credit during the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
Income Tax. For the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we recognized income tax
expense of $2,216,000 and $1,541,000, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was 39.2% and 39.9%, respectively. The effective tax rate
decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2009 primarily reflects a required decrease to
reflect the appropriate six month rate, offset by the decreased benefit from lower statutory rates
in foreign taxing jurisdictions.
Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.
20
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes certain key operating data for the periods indicated:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Gross profit percentage |
24.9 | % | 33.8 | % | ||||
Cash flow provided by (used in) operations |
$ | 2,725,000 | $ | (10,571,000 | ) | |||
Finished goods turnover (annualized) (1) |
5.6 | 4.1 | ||||||
Annualized return on equity (2) |
9.9 | % | 11.8 | % |
(1) | Annualized finished goods turnover for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is calculated by multiplying cost of sales for each six month period by 2 and dividing the result by the average between beginning and ending non-core finished goods inventory values for each six month period. We believe this provides a useful measure of our ability to turn production into revenues. | |
(2) | Annualized return on equity is computed as net income for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 multiplied by 2 and dividing the result by beginning shareholders equity. Annualized return on equity measures our ability to invest shareholders funds profitably. |
Following is our unaudited results of operations, reflected as a percentage of net sales:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Cost of goods sold |
75.1 | 66.2 | ||||||
Gross profit |
24.9 | 33.8 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
General and administrative |
8.5 | 13.3 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
3.9 | 3.4 | ||||||
Research and development |
0.9 | 1.5 | ||||||
Operating income |
11.6 | 15.6 | ||||||
Gain on acquisition |
(1.8 | ) | | |||||
Interest expense net of interest income |
2.7 | 2.8 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
4.3 | 5.1 | ||||||
Net income |
6.4 | % | 7.7 | % | ||||
Net Sales. Net sales for the six months ended September 30, 2009 increased by $2,985,000, to
$72,127,000 compared to net sales for the six months ended September 30, 2008 of $69,142,000. This
increase was primarily due to net sales to new customers acquired as a result of our acquisitions
partially offset by lower sales to our other existing customers. Our sales in the first two months
of the six month period were negatively impacted by an inventory reduction program initiated by one
of our largest customers and an understanding with a customer to delay shipments because of its
then uncertain financial future. In addition, our net sales for the six months ended September 30,
2009 were positively impacted by the recognition of $845,000 of previously deferred core revenue.
We have recognized this revenue because we do not expect to incur any additional sales incentive
allowances associated with Remanufactured Core buybacks from this customer.
Cost of Goods Sold/Gross Profit. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales increased during
the six months ended September 30, 2009 to 75.1% from 66.2% for the six months ended September 30,
2008, resulting in a corresponding decrease in our gross profit of 8.9% to 24.9% for the six months
ended September 30, 2009 from 33.8% for the six months ended September 30,
2008. The decrease in
the gross profit percentage, as compared to the six months ended September 30, 2008, was primarily
due to (i) a reduction in scrap metal prices that resulted in a decrease in revenue of $1,328,000
for our scrap metal compared to the six months ended September 30, 2008, (ii) the reversal of a
$1,307,000 accrual related to the customs duties claims during the six months ended September 30,
21
Table of Contents
2008, (iii) an increase in packaging costs of $898,000 reflecting increased sales compared to the
six months ended September 30, 2008, and (iv) an increase in the provision for inventory reserves
of $891,000 compared to the six months ended September 30, 2008. In addition, our gross profit in
the prior year was impacted by acceleration of $2,300,000 of promotional allowances in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008, which otherwise would have been earned by one of our customers during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 through the first four months of fiscal 2009.
General and Administrative. Our general and administrative expenses for the six months ended
September 30, 2009 were $6,165,000, which represents a decrease of $3,009,000, or 32.8%, from
general and administrative expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2008 of $9,174,000. This
decrease in general and administrative expenses during the six months ended September 30, 2009 was
primarily due to the following: (i) a net gain of $1,460,000 recorded due to the changes in the
fair value of foreign exchange contracts, (ii) $439,000 of decreased professional services fees,
(iii) $287,000 of decreased stock-based compensation, (iv) $228,000 of decreased general and
administrative expenses at our offshore manufacturing facilities, (v) $137,000 of decreased travel
expense, and (vi) $93,000 of decreased severance and other related expenses.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2009
increased $451,000, or 19.1%, to $2,807,000 from $2,356,000 for the six months ended September 30,
2008. This increase was due primarily to the addition of employees as a result of our acquisitions,
increased catalog expenses, and increased commission expenses due to higher net sales.
Research and Development. Our research and development expenses decreased by $375,000, or 36.0%, to
$668,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2009 from $1,043,000 for the six months ended
September 30, 2008. The decrease in research and development expense was due primarily to lower
compensation, consulting fees, and travel.
Gain on acquisition. During the six months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded a gain of
$1,331,000 in connection with the acquisition of certain assets of Reliance as the estimated fair value of the net
assets acquired exceeded the fair value of the consideration transferred.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense, net of interest income, for the six months ended September
30, 2009 was $1,970,000. This represents an increase of $4,000 over interest expense, net of
interest income, of $1,966,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2008. This increase was
primarily attributable to higher average outstanding balances on our line of credit and higher
discount rates on factored receivables, which were partially offset by lower interest rates on our
line of credit balance and a decrease in factored receivables during the six months ended September
30, 2009 as compared to the six months ended September 30, 2008.
Income Tax. For the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we recognized income tax expense
of $3,078,000 and $3,495,000, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 was 39.9% and 39.5%, respectively. The effective tax rate increase
primarily reflects a decrease in the benefit from lower statutory rates in foreign taxing
jurisdictions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
At September 30, 2009, we had negative working capital of $5,590,000, a ratio of current assets to
current liabilities of 0.91:1, and cash of $1,633,000, compared to negative working capital of
$3,569,000, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 0.94:1, and cash of $452,000 at
March 31, 2009. The change in working capital from March 31, 2009 is primarily the result of an
increase in accounts payables balances and increased borrowings on our line of
credit, partly offset by (i) increased accounts receivables balances, (ii) increased cash on hand,
and (iii) a decrease in other current liabilities as a result of changes in the fair value of our
forward foreign currency exchange contracts.
During the six months ended September 30, 2009, we used cash generated by operations, obtained from
our Revolving Loan, and from our receivable discount programs we have with certain of our customers
as our primary sources of liquidity. In September 2009, one of these customers reinstated the use
of its receivable discount program which had been previously suspended in May 2008.
22
Table of Contents
In October 2009, we entered into a Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the New Credit
Agreement), with our bank and one additional lender. The New Credit Agreement replaces the Credit
Agreement. See Note 14 in the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We believe our cash generated by operations, amounts available under our New Credit Agreement, and
our cash and short term investments on hand are sufficient to satisfy our expected future working
capital needs, capital lease commitments and capital expenditure obligations over the next twelve
months.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $2,725,000 for the six months ended September 30,
2009 compared to net cash used in operating activities of $10,571,000 for the six months ended
September 30, 2008. The most significant changes in operating activities for the six months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended September 30, 2008 were the (i) reinstatement
in September 2009 of a factoring arrangement with one of our major customers which had been
suspended by the customer in May 2008, (ii) an increase in our accounts payable and accrued
liabilities compared to the six months ended September 30, 2008, and (iii) our long term core
inventory levels increased less during the six months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same
six month period of the prior year due primarily to increased levels of Remanufactured Cores held
for sale at our customers locations. These changes in operating activities were partly offset by
the reduction in our non-core inventory levels due primarily to our concerted efforts to reduce our
operating inventory levels. We expect our cash flows in future periods will continue to be impacted
by the unavailability of net operating loss carryforwards.
Net cash used in investing activities was $2,936,000 and $8,160,000 during the six months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities
primarily resulted from the acquisition of certain assets of Reliance during the six months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to the acquisitions of both AIM and SCP during the six months ended
September 30, 2008. Capital expenditures for the six months ended September 30, 2009 primarily
related to the purchase of equipment for our manufacturing facilities compared to purchases in the
prior year primarily related to IT equipment and improvements at our Torrance, California and
offshore facilities.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1,373,000 and $16,646,000 during the six months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The borrowings under our line of credit during the
six month ended September 30, 2009, were primarily used to
finance our acquisition of certain assets of Reliance. The
borrowings under our line of credit in the prior year were primarily
used to finance our acquisitions of
AIM and SCP, pay down our accounts payable balances, and to offset the reduction in cash resources
due to one of our customers suspension of its receivable discount program to factor our accounts
receivable. In September 2009, this customer re-opened the use of this program.
Capital Resources
Line of Credit
Our amended and restated credit agreement, as amended, with our bank and in effect at September 30,
2009 (the Credit Agreement) continued to provide us with a revolving loan (the Revolving Loan)
of up to $40,000,000, including obligations under outstanding letters of credit. The Credit
Agreement, among other things, allowed us to borrow under the Revolving Loan for the purpose of
consummating certain permitted acquisitions.
In June 2009, we entered into a sixth amendment to the Credit Agreement with our bank. This
amendment, among other things: (i) created a borrowing reserve in the amount of $7,500,000 reserved
by our bank against our Revolving Loan commitment amount and available in the event the receivables
from our largest customer were no longer factored, and (ii) amended certain financial covenants,
including our leverage ratio and EBITDA covenants.
In August 2009, we entered into a seventh amendment to the Credit Agreement with our bank. This
amendment, among other things, extended the expiration date of the credit facility to July 13,
2010.
23
Table of Contents
The bank holds a security interest in substantially all of our assets. The balance of the Revolving
Loan was $23,700,000 and $21,600,000 at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
Additionally, we had reserved $2,201,000 of the Revolving Loan for standby letters of credit for
workers compensation insurance and $221,000 reserved for commercial letters of credit as of
September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, $13,878,000 was available under the Revolving Loan,
and of this, $7,500,000 was reserved for use in the event our largest customer discontinued its
current practice of having our receivables factored.
The Credit Agreement (as amended), among other things, continued to require us to maintain certain
financial covenants, including cash flow, fixed charge coverage ratio and leverage ratio and
a number of restrictive covenants, including limits on capital expenditures and operating
leases, prohibitions against additional indebtedness, payment of dividends, pledge of assets and
loans to officers and/or affiliates. In addition, it was an event of default under the Credit
Agreement if Selwyn Joffe was no longer our CEO.
We were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit Agreement as of September 30,
2009.
Borrowings under the Revolving Loan bear interest at either the banks reference rate or London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) as selected by us for the applicable interest period plus, in each
case, an applicable margin which is determined quarterly on a prospective basis as below:
Leverage Ratio as of the End of the Fiscal Quarter | ||||
Greater Than or | ||||
Base Interest Rate Selected by us | Equal to 1.50 to 1.00 | Less Than 1.50 to 1.00 | ||
Banks Reference Rate, plus
|
1.25% per year | 1.0% per year | ||
Banks LIBOR Rate, plus
|
2.5% per year | 2.25% per year |
Subsequent Events
In October 2009, we entered into the New Credit Agreement with our lenders. The New Credit
Agreement permits us to borrow up to $45,000,000 under the new credit facility (the New Credit
Facility). The New Credit Facility, among other things, provides us with a revolving loan (the
Revolving Loan) of up to $35,000,000, including obligations under outstanding letters of credit
and a borrowing reserve in the amount of $7,500,000 to be reserved by the lenders against our
Revolving Loan commitment amount and this borrowing reserve becomes available in the event the
receivables from our largest customer are no longer factored, and a term loan (the Term Loan) in
the principal amount of $10,000,000.
The Revolving Loan and the Term Loan bear interest at the banks reference rate, plus an applicable
margin, or a LIBOR rate, plus an applicable margin, as selected by us in accordance with the New
Credit Agreement. In addition, the New Credit Agreement, among other things, requires us to
maintain certain financial covenants, including tangible net worth, fixed charge coverage ratio and
leverage ratio covenants.
The Term Loan matures in October 2014 and requires principal payments of $500,000 on a quarterly
basis. The first quarterly payment is due on January 4, 2010. The Revolving Loan expires in October
2011 and provides us the option to request up to three one-year extensions.
Our ability to comply in future periods with the financial covenants in the New Credit Agreement,
will depend on our ongoing financial and operating performance, which, in turn, will be subject to
economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our
control and will be substantially dependent on the selling prices and demand for our products,
customer demands for marketing allowances and other concessions,
raw material costs, and our ability to successfully implement our overall business strategy,
including acquisitions. If a violation of any of the covenants occurs in the future, we would
attempt to obtain a waiver or an amendment from our bank. No assurance can be given that we would
be successful in this regard.
Receivable Discount Program
Our liquidity has been positively impacted by receivable discount programs we have established with
certain customers and their respective banks. Under these programs, we have the option to sell
those customers receivables
24
Table of Contents
to those banks at a discount to be agreed upon at the time the
receivables are sold. The discount under this program averaged 5.1% during the six months ended
September 30, 2009 and has allowed us to accelerate collection of receivables aggregating
$31,113,000 by an average of 313 days. While these arrangements have reduced our working capital
needs, there can be no assurance that these programs will continue in the future. These programs
resulted in interest expense of $1,389,000 during the six months ended September 30, 2009. Interest
expense resulting from these programs would increase if interest rates rise, if utilization of
these discounting arrangements expands, or if the discount period is extended to reflect more
favorable payment terms to customers. In September 2009, one of these customers reinstated the use
of its receivable discount program which had been previously suspended in May 2008.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At September 30, 2009, we had no off-balance sheet financing or other arrangements with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships (such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities) established for purposes of facilitating off-balance sheet
financing or other debt arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Capital Expenditures and Commitments
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures were $484,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and primarily
relate to the purchase of equipment for our manufacturing facilities. We expect our fiscal year
2010 capital expenditures to be approximately $1.5 million. We intend to use our working capital
and incur additional capital lease obligations to finance these capital expenditures.
Related Party Transactions
Our related party transactions primarily consist of employment and director agreements and stock
option agreements. Our related party transactions have not changed since March 31, 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates that are
presented in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, except as
discussed below.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2009, the FASB established standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued that are included in FASB
ASC 855, Subsequent Events (FASB ASC 855). Entities are required to disclose the date through
which subsequent events have been evaluated and the basis for that date. FASB ASC 855 is effective
on a prospective basis for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of
this standard on June 30, 2009 did not have any material impact on our consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment to SFAS No. 140 (SFAS No. 166). SFAS No. 166 eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity,
changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures in
order to enhance information reported to users of financial statements by providing greater
transparency about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and an
entitys continuing involvement in and exposure to the risks related to transferred financial
assets. SFAS No. 166 is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins
after November 15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 166 on April 1, 2010 to have any
material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
25
Table of Contents
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No.
167). This statement amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities
and is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after November
15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 167 on April 1, 2010 to have any material
impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB approved the FASB ASC as the single source of authoritative, nongovernmental
GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included
in the ASC has become non-authoritative. The ASC is effective for financial statements for interim
or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. We began to use the new guidelines and
numbering system prescribed by the ASC when referring to GAAP during the second quarter of fiscal
2010. As the ASC was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it did not have any impact on
our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-05, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This update
provides clarification for the fair value measurement of liabilities in circumstances in which a
quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available. This update is
effective for the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after issuance. We
do not expect the adoption of this update on October 1, 2009 to have any material impact on our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as
of March 31, 2009, which was filed on June 15, 2009.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
26
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Item 1A to Part I of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on June 15,
2009.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Limitation on Payment of DividendsThe Credit Agreement prohibited and the New Credit Agreement
prohibits the declaration or payment of any dividends by us other than dividends payable
in our capital stock.
27
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
(a) | Exhibits: |
Number | Description of Exhibit | Method of Filing | ||
3.1
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form SB-2 declared effective on March 22, 1994 (the 1994 Registration Statement). | ||
3.2
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-97498) declared effective on November 14, 1995. | ||
3.3
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1997. | ||
3.4
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998 (the 1998 Form 10-K). | ||
3.5
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to the Companys proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on November 25, 2003. | ||
3.6
|
By-Laws of the Company | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the 1994 Registration Statement. | ||
4.1
|
Specimen Certificate of the Companys common stock | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the 1994 Registration Statement. | ||
4.2
|
Form of Underwriters common stock purchase warrant | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the 1994 Registration Statement. | ||
4.3
|
1994 Stock Option Plan | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the 1994 Registration Statement. | ||
4.4
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the 1994 Registration Statement. | ||
4.5
|
1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan |
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995. | ||
4.6
|
1996 Stock Option Plan | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 333-37977) declared effective on November 18, 1997. | ||
4.8
|
2003 Long Term Incentive Plan | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on April 2, 2004. | ||
4.9
|
2004 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan |
Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the 2004 Annual Shareholders Meeting. | ||
4.10
|
Registration Rights Agreement among the Company and the investors identified on the signature pages thereto, dated as of May 18, 2007 | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 18, 2007. |
28
Table of Contents
Number | Description of Exhibit | Method of Filing | ||
4.11
|
Form of Warrant to be issued by the Company to investors in connection with the May 2007 Private Placement | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 18, 2007. | ||
10.1
|
Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2009, between the Company and Union Bank, N.A. | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 10, 2009. | ||
10.2
|
Revolving Note, dated as of July 31, 2009, executed by the Company in favor of Union Bank, N.A. | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 10, 2009. | ||
10.3
|
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2009, between the Company and Union Bank, N.A. and Branch Banking & Trust Company. | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2009. | ||
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith. | ||
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith. | ||
31.3
|
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith. | ||
32.1
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith. |
29
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC |
||||
Dated: November 9, 2009 | By: | /s/ David Lee | ||
David Lee | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Dated: November 9, 2009 | By: | /s/ Kevin Daly | ||
Kevin Daly | ||||
Chief Accounting Officer | ||||
30