MRC GLOBAL INC. - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

___________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

 

Commission file number: 001-35479

 

MRC GLOBAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

(877) 294-7574
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

________________

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [ X]      No  [   ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes[X]    No[   ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer [ X  ]                  Accelerated filer  [   ]             Non-accelerated filer  [    ]        Smaller reporting company [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes [   ]   No  [X]

 

The Company’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “MRC”.   There were 101,707,967 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding as of July 31, 2013.

 

 

---

 

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

MRC GLOBAL INC.

 

NOTE 1 – BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

Business Operations:  MRC Global Inc. is a holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas. Our wholly owned subsidiaries, McJunkin Red Man Corporation and its subsidiaries, are global distributors of pipe, valves, fittings (“PVF”) and related products and services to the energy and industrial sectors, across each of the upstream (exploration, production and extraction of underground oil and gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and gas, gas utilities and the storage and distribution of oil and gas) and downstream (crude oil refining, petrochemical processing and general industrials) sectors. We have branches in principal industrial, hydrocarbon producing and refining areas throughout the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia and Australasia. Our products are obtained from a broad range of suppliers.

Basis of Presentation:  We have prepared our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements.  These statements do not include all information and footnotes that generally accepted accounting principles require for complete annual financial statements. However, the information in these statements reflects all normal recurring adjustments which are, in our opinion, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that will be realized for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013.  We have derived our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 from the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012.  You should read these condensed consolidated financial statements in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MRC Global Inc. and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company” or by such terms as “we,” “our” or “us”). All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards:  In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Standards Update No. 2013-05, Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (ASU 2013-05), which specifies that a cumulative translation adjustment (“CTA”) should be released into earnings when an entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets within a consolidated foreign entity and the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity.  For sales of an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, a pro rata portion of CTA attributable to the investment would be recognized in earnings upon sale of the investment.  When an entity sells either a part or all of its investment in a consolidated foreign entity, CTA would be recognized in earnings only if the sale results in the parent no longer having a controlling financial interest in the foreign entity.  CTA would be recognized in earnings in a business combination achieved in stages.  ASU 2013-05 is effective for us prospectively in 2014.  We do not expect this update to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

 

NOTE 2 – INVENTORIES

 

The composition of our inventory is as follows (in thousands):

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE 3 – LONG-TERM DEBT

The components of our long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):

Senior Secured Term Loan B:  We have a $650 million seven-year Senior Secured Term Loan B (the “Term Loan”) which amortizes in equal quarterly installments of 1% per year with the balance payable in November 2019 when the facility matures.    Subject to securing additional lender commitments, the Term Loan allows for incremental increases in facility size above $650 million up to an aggregate of $200 million, plus an additional amount such that the Company’s senior secured leverage ratio (as defined under the Term Loan) would not exceed 3.50 to 1.00.  This facility is guaranteed by us as well as all of our wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries.  In addition, it is secured by a second lien on those assets securing our Global ABL Facility (which includes accounts receivable, inventory and related assets) and a first lien on substantially all of our other assets and those of our U.S. subsidiaries, as well as a pledge of all of the capital stock of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of first tier, non-U.S. subsidiaries.  We are required to repay the Term Loan with certain asset sales and insurance proceeds,  certain debt proceeds and 50% of excess cash flow (reducing to 25% if our senior secured leverage ratios is no more than 2.75 to 1.00 and 0% if our senior secured leverage ratio is no more than 2.50 to 1.00).  In addition, the Term Loan contains a number of customary restrictive covenants.

The interest rate for the Term Loan, including the amortization of original issue discount, was 6.14% and 6.39% as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  This interest rate was reduced by 0.25% during the second quarter of 2013 as the result of a lower senior secured leverage ratio.

Global ABL Facility:  We have a $1.25 billion multi-currency global asset-based revolving credit facility (the “Global ABL Facility”) that matures in March 2017. This facility is comprised of $977 million in revolver commitments in the United States, $170 million in Canada, $12 million in the United Kingdom, $75 million in Australia, $9 million in the Netherlands and $7 million in Belgium. It contains an accordion feature that allows us to increase the principal amount of the facility by up to $300 million, subject to securing additional lender commitments.  

We and each of our current and future wholly owned material U.S. subsidiaries guarantee the obligations of our borrower subsidiaries under the Global ABL Facility. Additionally, each of our non-U.S. borrower subsidiaries guarantees the obligations of our other non-U.S. borrower subsidiaries under the Global ABL Facility. Outstanding obligations are generally secured by a first priority security interest in accounts receivable, inventory and related assets. 

The interest rate for the Global ABL Facility was 2.34% and 2.21% as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

Availability under our Global ABL Facility was $520 million as of June 30, 2013.

---

 

 

NOTE 4 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Stock Options and Restricted Stock

Our 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan has 3,250,000 shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the plan.  The plan permits the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other stock-based and cash-based awards.  Since the adoption of the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors has periodically granted stock options and restricted stock to directors and employees, but no other types of awards have been granted under the plan.  Options and stock appreciation rights may not be granted at prices less than their fair market value on the date of the grant, nor for a term exceeding ten years. For employees, vesting generally occurs over a four or five year period on the anniversaries of the date specified in the employees’ respective agreements, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances set forth in the option agreements. Vesting for directors generally occurs in one year.  In March 2013, 641,294 stock options and 87,914 shares of restricted stock were issued to employees. In May 2013, 71,878 stock options and 9,413 shares of restricted stock were issued to members of our Board of Directors.  To date, 1,876,260 shares have been granted to management, members of our Board of Directors and key employees under this plan.  We expense the fair value of the stock option grants on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. A Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of the stock options.

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consists of the following (in thousands):

 

Earnings per Share

Earnings per share are calculated in the table below (in thousands, except per share amounts). 

 

Stock options and shares of restricted stock are disregarded in this calculation if they are determined to be anti-dilutive.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we had approximately 0.7 million anti-dilutive stock options.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012,  we had approximately 2.2 million anti-dilutive stock options. There was no anti-dilutive restricted stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

---

 

 

NOTE 5 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

We operate as three business segments, U.S., Canada and International. Our International segment consists of our operations outside of the U.S. and Canada, principally Europe, Asia and Australasia. These segments represent our business of selling PVF and related products and services to the energy and industrial sectors, across each of the upstream (exploration, production and extraction of underground oil and gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and gas, gas utilities, and the storage and distribution of oil and gas) and downstream (crude oil refining, petrochemical processing and general industrials) sectors. 

The following table presents financial information for each segment (in millions):

 

---

 

Our sales by product line are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

From time to time, we use derivative financial instruments to help manage our exposure to interest rate risk and fluctuations in foreign currencies. All of our derivative instruments are freestanding and, accordingly, changes in their fair market value are recorded in earnings.  As of June 30, 2013, we do not have any interest rate swap agreements. Foreign exchange forward contracts are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs, as the fair value is based on broker quotes for the same or similar derivative instruments. The total notional amount of our forward foreign exchange contracts was approximately $67 million and $69 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  We had approximately $0 and $3,000 recorded as assets on our consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

With the exception of long-term debt, the fair values of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate carrying value.  The carrying value of our debt was $1.084 billion and $1.257 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  We estimate the fair value of the Term Loan using Level 2 inputs, or quoted market prices.  The fair value of our debt was $1.086 billion and $1.261 billion at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

 

Asbestos Claims.    We are one of many defendants in lawsuits that plaintiffs have brought seeking damages for personal injuries that exposure to asbestos allegedly caused. Plaintiffs and their family members have brought these lawsuits against a large volume of defendant entities as a result of the defendants’ manufacture, distribution, supply or other involvement with asbestos, asbestos containing-products or equipment or activities that allegedly caused plaintiffs to be exposed to asbestos.  These plaintiffs typically assert exposure to asbestos as a consequence of third-party manufactured products that MRC purportedly distributed.  As of June 30, 2013, we are named a defendant in approximately 256 lawsuits involving approximately 908 claims.  No asbestos lawsuit has resulted in a judgment against us to date, with a majority being settled, dismissed or otherwise resolved.  Applicable third-party insurance has substantially covered these claims, and insurance should continue to cover a substantial majority of existing and anticipated future claims.  Accordingly, we have recorded a liability for our estimate of the most likely settlement of asserted claims and a related receivable from insurers for our estimated recovery, to the extent we believe that the amounts of recovery are probable.  While the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based upon our historical experience with these types of claims and analysis of pending claims, we do not believe that there is a

---

 

reasonable possibility of potential losses arising from these claims that would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. 

Other Legal Claims and Proceedings.    From time to time, we have been subject to various claims and involved in legal proceedings incidental to the nature of our businesses. We maintain insurance coverage to reduce financial risk associated with certain of these claims and proceedings. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these claims and proceedings. However, in our opinion, there are no pending legal proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Product Claims.    From time to time, in the ordinary course of our business, our customers may claim that the products that we distribute are either defective or require repair or replacement under warranties that either we or the manufacturer may provide to the customer. These proceedings are, in the opinion of management, ordinary and routine matters incidental to our normal business. Our purchase orders with our suppliers generally require the manufacturer to indemnify us against any product liability claims, leaving the manufacturer ultimately responsible for these claims. In many cases, state, provincial or foreign law provides protection to distributors for these sorts of claims, shifting the responsibility to the manufacturer. In some cases, we could be required to repair or replace the products for the benefit of our customer and seek our recovery from the manufacturer for our expense. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these claims and proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Customer Contracts

 

We have contracts and agreements with many of our customers that dictate certain terms of our sales arrangements (pricing, deliverables, etc.). While we make every effort to abide by the terms of these contracts, certain provisions are complex and often subject to varying interpretations. Under the terms of these contracts, our customers have the right to audit our adherence to the contract terms. Historically, any settlements that have resulted from these customer audits have not been material to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Purchase Commitments

We have purchase obligations consisting primarily of inventory purchases made in the normal course of business to meet operating needs. While our vendors often allow us to cancel these purchase orders without penalty, in certain cases, cancellations may subject us to cancellation fees or penalties depending on the terms of the contract

 

NOTE 8 – Subsequent event

 

On July 1, 2013, we completed the $24 million acquisition of Dan H. Brown, Inc., d/b/a Flow Control Products (“Flow Control”).  Flow Control is a leading provider in pneumatic and electro-hydraulic valve automation packages and related field support to the Permian Basin.  Concurrent with this transaction, we are expanding our existing facility in Odessa, Texas, into a 110,000 square foot Regional Distribution Center.  When completed in 2014, the Flow Control business will begin to operate from this newly expanded facility.

---

 

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. All references throughout this section (and elsewhere in this report) to amounts available for borrowing under various credit facilities refer to amounts actually available for borrowing after giving effect to any borrowing base limitations imposed by the facility.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (as well as other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q) contain forward-looking statements, including, for example, statements about our business strategy, our industry, our future profitability, growth in the industry sectors we serve, our expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, prospects and assumptions, and estimates and projections of future activity and trends in the oil and natural gas industry. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. These statements are based on management’s expectations that involve a number of business risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the factors described under “Risk Factors”, that may cause our actual results and performance to be materially different from any future results or performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among other things:

•    decreases in oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids prices;

•    decreases in oil and natural gas industry expenditure levels, which may result from decreased oil and natural gas prices or other factors;

•    increased usage of alternative fuels, which may negatively affect oil and natural gas industry expenditure levels;

•    U.S. and international general economic conditions;

•    our ability to compete successfully with other companies in our industry;

•    the risk that manufacturers of the products we distribute will sell a substantial amount of goods directly to end users in the industry sectors we serve;

•    unexpected supply shortages;

•    cost increases by our suppliers;

•    our lack of long-term contracts with most of our suppliers;

•    increases in customer, manufacturer and distributor inventory levels;

•    suppliers’ price reductions of products that we sell, which could cause the value of our inventory to decline;

•    decreases in steel prices, which could significantly lower our profit;

•    increases in steel prices, which we may be unable to pass along to our customers which could significantly lower our profit;

•    our lack of long-term contracts with many of our customers and our lack of contracts with customers that require minimum purchase volumes;

•    changes in our customer and product mix;

•    risks related to our customers’ creditworthiness;

•    the potential adverse effects associated with integrating acquisitions into our business and whether these acquisitions will yield their intended benefits;

•    the success of our acquisition strategies;

•    our significant indebtedness;

•    the dependence on our subsidiaries for cash to meet our debt obligations;

---

 

•    changes in our credit profile;

•    a decline in demand for certain of the products we distribute if import restrictions on these products are lifted;

•    environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and the interpretation or implementation thereof;

•    the sufficiency of our insurance policies to cover losses, including liabilities arising from litigation;

•    product liability claims against us;

•    pending or future asbestos-related claims against us;

•    the potential loss of key personnel;

•    interruption in the proper functioning of our information systems;

•    loss of third-party transportation providers;

•    potential inability to obtain necessary capital;

•    risks related to adverse weather events or natural disasters;

•    impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets;

•    changes in tax laws or adverse positions taken by taxing authorities in the countries in which we operate;

•    adverse changes in political or economic conditions in the countries in which we operate;

•    exposure to U.S. and international laws and regulations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act and other economic sanction programs;

•    risks relating to ongoing evaluations of internal controls required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

•    the impact on us of the SEC’s move toward convergence with IFRS; and 

•    the occurrence of cyber security incidents.

Undue reliance should not be placed on our forward-looking statements. Although forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise, except to the extent law requires.

Overview

We are the largest global industrial distributor, based on sales, of PVF and related products and services to the energy industry and hold a leading position in our industry across each of the upstream (exploration, production and extraction of underground oil and natural gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and natural gas, natural gas utilities and the storage and distribution of oil and natural gas) and downstream (crude oil refining, petrochemical and chemical, processing and general industrials) sectors. Our business is segregated into three operating segments, consisting of our U.S. operations, our Canadian operations and our International operations. We serve our customers from over 400 service locations. We offer a wide array of PVF and oilfield supplies encompassing a complete line of products from our global network of suppliers to more than 18,000 customers. We are diversified by geography, the industry sectors we serve and the products we sell. We seek to provide best-in-class service to our customers by satisfying the most complex, multi-site needs of many of the largest companies in the energy and industrials sectors as their primary PVF supplier. We believe the critical role we play in our customers’ supply chain, together with our extensive product offering, broad global presence, customer-linked scalable information systems and efficient distribution capabilities, serve to solidify our long-standing customer relationships and drive our growth. As a result, we have an average relationship of over 20 years with our 25 largest customers.

Key Drivers of Our Business

Our revenues are predominantly derived from the sale of PVF and other oilfield and industrial supplies to the energy sector in North America, Europe, Asia and Australasia. Our business is therefore dependent upon both the current conditions and future prospects in the energy industry and, in particular, maintenance and expansionary operating and capital expenditures by our customers in the upstream, midstream and downstream sectors of the industry. Long-term growth in spending has been, and we believe will continue to be, driven by several factors, including underinvestment in global energy infrastructure, growth in shale and unconventional exploration and production (“E&P”) activity, and

---

 

anticipated strength in the oil, natural gas, refined products, petrochemical and other industrials sectors. The outlook for future oil, natural gas, refined products, petrochemical and other industrial PVF spending is influenced by numerous factors, including the following:

•    Oil and Natural Gas Prices. Sales of PVF and related products to the oil and natural gas industry constitute a significant portion of our sales. As a result, we depend upon the oil and natural gas industry and its ability and willingness to make maintenance and capital expenditures to explore for, produce and process oil and natural gas and refined products. Oil and natural gas prices, both current and projected, along with the costs necessary to produce oil and gas, impact other drivers of our business, including E&P spending, additions to and maintenance of pipelines and pipeline gathering systems, refinery utilization and petrochemical and other industrial processing activity.

•    Economic Conditions. The demand for the products we distribute is dependent on the general economy, the energy and industrials sectors and other factors. Changes in the general economy or in the energy and industrials sectors (domestically or internationally) can cause demand for the products we distribute to materially change.

•    Customer, Manufacturer and Distributor Inventory Levels of PVF and Related Products. Customer, manufacturer and distributor inventory levels of PVF and related products can change significantly from period to period. Increases in our customers’ inventory levels can have an adverse effect on the demand for the products we distribute when customers draw from their inventory rather than purchase new products. Reduced demand, in turn, would likely result in reduced sales volume and profitability. Increased inventory levels by manufacturers or other distributors can cause an oversupply of PVF and related products in the industry sectors we serve and reduce the prices that we are able to charge for the products we distribute. Reduced prices, in turn, would likely reduce our profitability. Conversely, decreased customer and manufacturer inventory levels may ultimately lead to increased demand for our products and would likely result in increased sales volumes and overall profitability.

•     Steel Prices, Availability and Supply and Demand. Fluctuations in steel prices can lead to volatility in the pricing of the products we distribute, especially carbon steel tubular products, which can influence the buying patterns of our customers. A majority of the products we distribute contain various types of steel. The worldwide supply and demand for these products, or other steel products that we do not supply, impacts the pricing and availability of our products and, ultimately, our sales and operating profitability.

Recent Trends and Outlook

During the first six months of 2013, the average oil price of West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) declined from $113.42 per barrel in the first six months of 2012, but remained strong at $107.34 per barrel.  Despite the relative strength of oil prices, North American drilling activity decreased 11% in the first six months of 2013 as compared to the same period of 2012. Natural gas prices increased to an average price of $3.76/Mcf (Henry Hub) for the first six months of 2013 compared to $2.36/Mcf (Henry Hub) for the first six months of 2012. At June 30, 2013, the natural gas price was $3.57/Mcf (Henry Hub).  However, rig activity continues to be heavily weighted toward oil relative to natural gas, with oil drilling representing 76% of the total North American rig count during the first six months of 2013 compared to 67% for the same time period in 2012.

Near the end of the fourth quarter of 2012, we experienced the impact of a general slow-down in the activities of our U.S. customers.  This trend continued into the first half of 2013, particularly in the upstream and midstream sectors, which were also negatively impacted by adverse winter weather conditions in certain parts of the country.  Business has remained strong in the heavy oil and oil sands regions of Canada, although a longer spring break-up negatively impacted our second quarter results.  Our downstream and other industrials sector performance remains stable.  In the first half of 2013 we saw modest growth in our U.S downstream business attributable to increases in turnaround activity at refineries.

Capital spending by some of our largest midstream customers was impacted by lower upstream drilling activity and lower natural gas liquid (“NGL”) prices, which resulted in lower line pipe sales.  In addition, the permitting environment for new crude oil pipelines has slowed, resulting in the continued use by many customers of rail and trucks to transport oil.  As a result of these factors, our line pipe sales decreased $92 million in the first half of 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012, including a $63 million reduction experienced in the second quarter alone.

 

Internationally, the outlook remains cautious. Europe continues to experience slow economic growth.  Slow downs in China continue to negatively impact investment in Australia.  

---

 

In 2012, we implemented our strategy to focus on our higher margin product lines and reduce exposure to the oil country tubular goods (“OCTG”) business.  As a result of this strategy, OCTG represented only 9% of total sales in the first half of 2013 compared to 15% in the first half of 2012 and our investment in OCTG inventory at June 30, 2013 was $83 million compared to $159 million a year ago.  The impact of this rebalancing effort was to reduce our OCTG sales by approximately $175 million in the first half of 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. 

On July 1, 2013, we completed the $24 million acquisition of Dan H. Brown, Inc., d/b/a Flow Control Products (“Flow Control”).  Flow Control is a leading provider in pneumatic and electro-hydraulic valve automation packages and related field support to the Permian Basin.  Concurrent with this transaction, we are expanding our existing facility in Odessa, Texas, into a 110,000 square foot Regional Distribution Center.  When completed in 2014, the Flow Control business will begin to operate from this newly expanded facility. 

We determine backlog by the amount of unshipped customer orders, either specific or general in nature (including orders held under pipe programs), which the customer may revise or cancel in certain instances.  At June 30, 2013, total backlog was $639 million, including $396 million in our U.S. segment, $49 million in our Canadian segment and $194 million in our International segment.  At December 31, 2012, total backlog was $664 million, including $455 million in our U.S segment, $62 million in our Canadian segment and $147 million in our International segment.  There can be no assurance that the backlog amounts will ultimately be realized as revenue or that we will earn a profit on the backlog of orders.

---

 

The following table shows key industry indicators for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

The breakdown of our sales by sector for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was as follows (in millions):

 

 

---

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 the following table summarizes our results of operations (in millions): 

Sales.    Sales include the revenue recognized from the sale of the products we distribute and services to customers and freight billings to customers, less cash discounts taken by customers in return for their early payment of our invoices to them. Our sales decreased 11% to $1,267.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $1,430.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

U.S. Segment—Our U.S. sales decreased to $975.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $1,119.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. This $144.4 million, or 13%, decrease reflected an  $83 million reduction in OCTG sales resulting from our strategy to rebalance our sales and inventories away from this more volatile, lower margin portion of our business.  In addition, our line pipe sales declined $55 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the same period of 2012 as a result of our upstream and midstream customers’ decreased spending in 2013.  Our second quarter 2013 revenues benefitted from the June and December 2012 acquisitions of the business of Chaparral Supply, LLC and Production Specialty Services Inc. (“PSS”) which collectively contributed sales of $41 million. 

Canadian Segment—Our Canadian sales decreased to $153.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $159.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The 4% decrease was attributable to a longer than normal spring break-up in the second quarter which negatively affected sales by approximately $10 million.  

International Segment—Our International sales decreased to $139.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $151.3 million for the same period in 2012. The  8% revenue decline reflected weaker demand, particularly in parts of Australia, where we have seen reduced customer spending in the mining and oil and gas sectors.

---

 

Gross Profit.    Our gross profit was $243.9 million (19.2% of sales) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $241.7 million (16.9% of sales) for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The 230 basis point improvement in gross profit percentage was a result of planned changes in our product mix as well as other gross profit enhancement strategies.  Gross profit was further benefitted by lower product costs reflected in our last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) inventory costing methodology.  LIFO resulted in a reduction in cost of sales of $12.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to an increase in cost of sales of $11.6 million during the same period of 2012.     These improvements in gross profit percentage were offset by  a reduction in gross profit resulting from lower sales.

 

Certain purchasing costs and warehousing activities (including receiving, inspection and stocking costs), as well as general warehousing expenses, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and not in cost of sales.  As such, our gross profit may not be comparable to others that may include these expenses as a component of cost of sales.  Purchasing and warehousing costs approximated $9.1 million and $7.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Adjusted Gross Profit.    Adjusted Gross Profit decreased to $250.0 million (19.7% of sales) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $270.3 million (18.9% of sales) for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $20.3 million. Adjusted Gross Profit is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define Adjusted Gross Profit as sales, less cost of sales, plus depreciation and amortization, plus amortization of intangibles, and plus or minus the impact of our LIFO inventory costing methodology. We present Adjusted Gross Profit because we believe it is a useful indicator of our operating performance without regard to items, such as amortization of intangibles, that can vary substantially from company to company depending upon the nature and extent of acquisitions they have been involved in. Similarly, the impact of the LIFO inventory costing method can cause results to vary substantially from company to company depending upon whether they elect to utilize the LIFO method and depending upon which method they may elect. In particular, we believe that Adjusted Gross Profit is a useful indicator of our operating performance because Adjusted Gross Profit measures our operating performance without regard to acquisition transaction-related amortization expenses. We use Adjusted Gross Profit as a key performance indicator in managing our business. We believe that gross profit is the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that is most directly comparable to Adjusted Gross Profit.

The following table reconciles Adjusted Gross Profit with gross profit, as derived from our financial statements (in millions):

 

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses.    Costs such as salaries, wages, employee benefits, rent, utilities, communications, insurance, fuel and taxes (other than state and federal income taxes) that are necessary to operate our branch and corporate operations are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Also contained in this category are certain items that are nonoperational in nature, including certain costs of acquiring and integrating other businesses.  Our selling, general and administrative expenses were $154.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $151.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  This increase is primarily attributable to our December 2012 acquisition of Production Specialty Services Inc. (“PSS”) which added an incremental $4 million of SG&A expense in the second quarter of 2013. 

 

Operating Income.    Operating income was $89.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $90.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $0.6 million.

U.S. Segment—Operating income for our U.S. segment increased to $82.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $81.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  This modest growth in operating income was driven by improved gross profit percentage offset by lower revenue levels. 

---

 

Canadian Segment—Operating income for our Canadian segment increased to $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  The increase of $1.0 million was primarily the result of decreased personnel costs due to headcount reductions as an improvement in gross profit percentage was offset by lower revenue levels. 

International Segment—Operating income for our International segment decreased to $4.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $6.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  The decrease of $2.7 million was the result of the reduction in sales we experienced.  

Interest Expense.    Our interest expense was $15.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $30.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  The majority of the $15.5 million decrease was due to the November 2012 redemption of our 9.5% senior secured notes, which was funded by borrowings on our lower cost Term Loan B  and revolving credit facilities.  We also benefitted from an outstanding debt balance that was lower, on average, in the second quarter of 2013 by approximately $317 million as compared to the second quarter of 2012.    Our reduced indebtedness was largely attributable to our April 2012 initial public offering that generated net proceeds of $333 million that were used to repay debt.

Other expense, net. Our other expense increased to $11.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  The current quarter expenses included $13.6 million of foreign currency exchange losses due primarily to the weaker Australian and Canadian dollars as compared to the U.S. dollar.  Our 2012 second quarter results also reflected an $11.4 million pre-tax charge associated with the open market purchase, at a premium, of $102 million of our previously outstanding senior secured notes.  There were no similar charges in the second quarter of 2013. 

Income Tax Expense.    Our income tax expense was $19.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $16.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  Our effective tax rates were 30.5% and 34.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our rates generally differ from the federal statutory rate of 35% as a result of state income taxes and differing foreign income tax rates.  In the three months ended June 30, 2013, our tax rate was favorably impacted by a $2.6 million discrete reduction to our deferred tax liabilities.  Excluding the impact of this discrete reduction our effective tax rate would have been 34.9%.      

Net Income.    Our net income was $43.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $31.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an improvement of $12.6 million.

Adjusted EBITDA.    We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, amortization of intangibles and certain other expenses (such as gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and goodwill impairment) and plus or minus the impact of our LIFO inventory costing methodology. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, was $98.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $123.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

We believe Adjusted EBITDA provides investors a helpful measure for comparing our operating performance with the performance of other companies that have different financing and capital structures or tax rates. We believe that net income is the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that is most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA.

---

 

The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA with net income, as derived from our financial statements (in millions):

 

 

---

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

The breakdown of our sales by sector for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was as follows (in millions):

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the following table summarizes our results of operations (in millions):

Sales.    Our sales decreased 9% to $2,572.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $2,813.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

U.S. Segment—Our U.S. sales decreased to $1,940.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $2,172.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This $231.5 million, or 11%, decrease reflected a planned $188 million reduction in OCTG sales resulting from our strategy to rebalance our sales and inventories away from this more volatile, lower margin portion of our business.  In addition, our line pipe sales declined $82 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period of 2012 as a result of our upstream and midstream customers’ decreased spending in 2013.  Our first half 2013 sales benefitted from the June and December 2012

---

 

acquisitions of the business of Chaparral Supply, LLC and PSS, which collectively contributed an incremental $92 million of sales in the first half of 2013.

Canadian Segment—Our Canadian sales decreased to $358.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $367.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The 3% decrease was attributable to a longer than normal spring break-up in the second quarter which negatively affected sales by approximately $10 million.

International Segment—Our International sales increased to $274.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, from $273.0 million for the same period in 2012. The acquisition of the Piping Systems divison of OneSteel (“MRC PSA”) in March 2012 accounted for $27 million in incremental revenues.  Excluding the impact of this acquisition, revenues declined 10%  reflecting weaker demand particularly in parts of Australia where we have seen reduced customer spending in the mining and oil and gas sectors. 

Gross Profit.    Our gross profit was $490.5 million (19.1% of sales) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $478.2 million (17.0% of sales) for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The 210 basis point improvement in gross profit percentage was a result of planned changes in our product mix as well as other gross profit enhancement strategies.  Gross profit was further benefitted by lower product costs reflected in our last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) inventory costing methodology.  LIFO resulted in a reduction in cost of sales of $15.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to an increase in cost of sales of $18.5 million during the same period of 2012.  These improvements in gross profit percentage were offset by a reduction in gross profit from lower sales.  

 

Certain purchasing costs and warehousing activities (including receiving, inspection and stocking costs), as well as general warehousing expenses, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and not in cost of sales.  As such, our gross profit may not be comparable to others that may include these expenses as a component of cost of sales.  Purchasing and warehousing costs approximated $18.7 million and $16.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Adjusted Gross Profit.    Adjusted Gross Profit increased to $512.1 million (19.9% of sales) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $530.1 million (18.8% of sales) for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $18.0 million. Adjusted Gross Profit is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define Adjusted Gross Profit as sales, less cost of sales, plus depreciation and amortization, plus amortization of intangibles, and plus or minus the impact of our LIFO inventory costing methodology. We present Adjusted Gross Profit because we believe it is a useful indicator of our operating performance without regard to items, such as amortization of intangibles, that can vary substantially from company to company depending upon the nature and extent of acquisitions they have been involved in. Similarly, the impact of the LIFO inventory costing method can cause results to vary substantially from company to company depending upon whether they elect to utilize the LIFO method and depending upon which method they may elect. In particular, we believe that Adjusted Gross Profit is a useful indicator of our operating performance because Adjusted Gross Profit measures our operating performance without regard to acquisition transaction-related amortization expenses. We use Adjusted Gross Profit as a key performance indicator in managing our business. We believe that gross profit is the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that is most directly comparable to Adjusted Gross Profit.

The following table reconciles Adjusted Gross Profit with gross profit, as derived from our financial statements (in millions):

 

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses.   Our selling, general and administrative expenses were $314.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $297.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  Approximately $15 million of this $17 million increase was attributable to the incremental SG&A

---

 

expenses of our March and December 2012 acquisitions of MRC PSA and PSS, respectively.  The remainder of the increase was primarily due to increased personnel costs in North America.

 

Operating Income.    Operating income was $175.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to  $180.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $5.0 million.

U.S. Segment—Operating income for our U.S. segment increased to $156.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $156.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  This modest increase in operating income was driven by improved gross profit percentage offset by lower revenue levels. 

Canadian Segment—Operating income for our Canadian segment decreased to $11.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $11.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The decrease of $0.4 million was primarily a function of  a slight decrease in sales. 

International Segment—Operating income for our International segment decreased to $7.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $12.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The decrease of $4.8 million was the result of the reduction in sales we experienced, exclusive of our acquisition of MRC PSA.  

Interest Expense.    Our interest expense was $30.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $64.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The majority of the $33.9 million decrease was due to the November 2012 redemption of our 9.5% senior secured notes, which was funded by borrowings on our lower cost Term Loan  B and revolving credit facilities.  We also benefitted from an outstanding debt balance that was lower, on average, in the first half of 2013 by approximately $347 million as compared to the first half of 2012.  Our reduced indebtedness was largely attributable to our April 2012 initial public offering that generated net proceeds of $333 million that were used to repay debt.

Other expense, net. Our other expense increased to $11.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from income of $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The expenses for the first half of 2013 include $13.4 million of foreign currency exchange losses due primarily to the weaker Australian and Canadian dollars as compared to the U.S. dollar.  Our first half 2012 results also reflected an $11.4 million pre-tax charge associated with the open market purchase, at a premium, of $102 million of our previously outstanding senior secured notes.  There were no similar charges in the first half of 2013.

Income Tax Expense.    Our income tax expense was $44.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $37.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  Our effective tax rates were 32.9% and 35.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Our rates generally differ from the federal statutory rate of 35% as a result of state income taxes and differing foreign income tax rates.  In the six months ended June 30, 2013, our tax rate was favorably impacted by a $2.3 million discrete reduction to our deferred tax liabilities.  Excluding the impact of this discrete reduction our effective tax rate would have been 35.0%. 

Net Income.    Our net income was $90.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $68.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an improvement of $21.1 million.

Adjusted EBITDA.    We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, amortization of intangibles and certain other expenses (such as gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and goodwill impairment) and plus or minus the impact of our LIFO inventory costing methodology. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, was $202.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $238.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

We believe Adjusted EBITDA provides investors a helpful measure for comparing our operating performance with the performance of other companies that have different financing and capital structures or tax rates. We believe that net income is the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that is most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA.

---

 

The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA with net income, as derived from our financial statements (in millions):

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our primary sources of liquidity consist of cash generated from our operating activities, existing cash balances and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.  At June 30, 2013, our total liquidity, including cash on hand, was $558 million.  Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from our operating activities will continue to be primarily dependent on our sales of products and services to our customers at margins sufficient to cover our fixed and variable expenses.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $37.8 million and $37.1 million, respectively.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $35.1 million and $27.9 million of our cash and cash equivalents, respectively, were maintained in the accounts of our various foreign subsidiaries.  If such amounts were transferred among countries or repatriated to the U.S., such amounts may be subject to additional tax liabilities, which would be recognized in our financial statements in the period during which such decision would be made.  We have the intent and ability to indefinitely reinvest the cash held by our foreign subsidiaries, and there are currently no plans that require the repatriation of such amounts.

We have a $650 million seven-year Senior Secured Term Loan B (the “Term Loan”) which amortizes in equal quarterly installments of 1% per year with the balance payable in November 2019 when the facility matures.    Subject to securing additional lender commitments, the Term Loan allows for incremental increases in facility size above $650 million up to an aggregate of $200 million, plus an additional amount such that the Company’s senior secured leverage ratio (as defined under the Term Loan) would not exceed 3.50 to 1.00.  This facility is guaranteed by us as well as all of our wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries.  In addition, it is secured by a second lien on those assets securing our Global ABL Facility (which includes accounts receivable, inventory and related assets) and a first lien on substantially all of our other assets and those of our U.S. subsidiaries, as well as a pledge of all of the capital stock of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of first tier, non-U.S. subsidiaries.  We are required to repay the Term Loan with certain asset sales and insurance proceeds,  certain debt proceeds and 50% of excess cash flow (reducing to 25% if our senior secured leverage ratios is no more than 2.75 to 1.00 and 0% if our senior secured leverage ratio is no more than 2.50 to 1.00).  In addition, the Term Loan contains a number of customary restrictive covenants.

 

We have a $1.25 billion multi-currency global asset-based revolving credit facility (the “Global ABL Facility”) that matures in March 2017. This facility is comprised of $977 million in revolver commitments in the United States, $170 million in Canada, $12 million in the United Kingdom, $75 million in Australia, $9 million in the Netherlands and $7 million in Belgium. It contains an accordion feature that allows us to increase the principal amount of the facility by up to $300 million, subject to securing additional lender commitments.

We and each of our current and future wholly owned material U.S. subsidiaries guarantee the obligations of our borrower subsidiaries under the Global ABL Facility. Additionally, each of our non-U.S. borrower subsidiaries

---

 

guarantees the obligations of our other non-U.S. borrower subsidiaries under the Global ABL Facility. Outstanding obligations are generally secured by a first priority security interest in accounts receivable, inventory and related assets. 

 

Our credit ratings are below “investment grade” and as such could impact both our ability to raise new funds as well as the interest rates on our future borrowings. Our ability to incur additional debt is restricted by our existing obligations. We were in compliance with the covenants contained in our various credit facilities as of and during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

As a result of our March 2013 secondary offering, we are no longer a controlled company as defined by the New York Stock Exchange.  If funds affiliated with Goldman, Sachs & Co. beneficially own less than 5,141,547 shares of our common stock (approximately 5% of our shares based on the number of shares currently outstanding), all options and restricted stock granted prior to our initial public offering will vest, accelerating the recognition of stock based compensation.  At June 30, 2013, the unrecognized stock based compensation related to these pre-IPO grants was $7 million.  Funds affiliated with Goldman Sachs & Co. owned 17,489,233 shares as of June 30, 2013.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the periods indicated below (in millions):

 

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $181.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to net cash used in operating activities of  $46.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase in net cash provided by operations was primarily the result of an increase in net income of $21.2  million, due largely to our reduced interest costs, and reduced working capital requirements resulting from lower sales levels.  Excluding the impact of acquisitions, working capital decreased $74 million in the first half of 2013 as compared to an increase of $150 million in the first half of 2012. 

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $10.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $105.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The $95.0 million decrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the March 2012 acquisition of MRC PSA, which required $87.9 million of cash during the six months ended June 30, 2012.  Our capital expenditures were $10.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $14.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  

 Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $168.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $143.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The financing activities generally reflect advances and payments on our revolving credit facilities. In April 2012, we received $333.4 milion related to the initial public offering of our stock, and the funds were used to repay borrowings under our Global ABL Facility, which was offset by cash of $110.4 million used to purchase in the open market $102 million of our previously outstanding senior secured notes.    

---

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Standards Update No. 2013-05, Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (ASU 2013-05), which specifies that a cumulative translation adjustment (“CTA”) should be released into earnings when an entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets within a consolidated foreign entity and the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity.  For sales of an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, a pro rata portion of CTA attributable to the investment would be recognized in earnings upon sale of the investment.  When an entity sells either a part or all of its investment in a consolidated foreign entity, CTA would be recognized in earnings only if the sale results in the parent no longer having a controlling financial interest in the foreign entity.  CTA would be recognized in earnings in a business combination achieved in stages.  ASU 2013-05 is effective for us prospectively in 2014.  We do not expect this update to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in the financial statements.  Management bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions, which it believes are reasonable.  If actual amounts are ultimately different from these estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known.

 

Accounting policies are considered critical when they require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimates are made and when there are different estimates that management reasonably could have made, which would have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition, changes in our financial condition or results of operations.  For a description of our critical accounting policies, see “Item 7: “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results from Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. 

 

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see “Item 7A: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

 

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.  

 

As of June 30, 2013, we have reviewed, under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e).  Based upon and as of the date of that review, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required  to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting.    

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first six months of 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

---

 

Part II—other information

 

ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we have been subject to various claims and involved in legal proceedings incidental to the nature of our businesses. We maintain insurance coverage to reduce financial risk associated with certain of these claims and proceedings. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these claims and proceedings. However, in our opinion, there are no pending legal proceedings that are likely to have a material effect on our business, financial condition results of operations or cash flows, although it is possible that the resolution of certain actual, threatened or anticipated claims or proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period of resolution.

Also, from time to time, in the ordinary course of our business, our customers may claim that the products that we distribute are either defective or require repair or replacement under warranties that either we or the manufacturer may provide to the customer. These proceedings are, in the opinion of management, ordinary and routine matters incidental to our normal business. Our purchase orders with our suppliers generally require the manufacturer to indemnify us against any product liability claims, leaving the manufacturer ultimately responsible for these claims. In many cases, state, provincial or foreign law provides protection to distributors for these sorts of claims, shifting the responsibility to the manufacturer.  In some cases, we could be required to repair or replace the products for the benefit of our customer and seek our recovery from the manufacturer for our expense. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these claims and proceedings are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, although it is possible that the resolution of certain actual, threatened or anticipated claims or proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation in the period of resolution.

For information regarding asbestos cases in which we are a defendant and other claims and proceedings, see Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies to our unaudited condensed financial statements.

 

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

 

We are affected by risks specific to us as well as factors that affect all businesses operating in a global market. The significant factors known to us that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results are described in Item 2 of Part I above and in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012  under “Risk Factors”. There has been no material change in those risk factors.

 

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

None.

 

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None.

 

Item 4.  MINING SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

None.

 

Item 5.  Other Information

 

None.

 

---

 

Item 6.  Exhibits

 

 

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date:  August 2, 2013

---