NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009
Commission File Number: 001-32657
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD.
Incorporated in Bermuda
Mintflower Place
8 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton, HM08
Bermuda
(441) 292-1510
98-0363970
Mintflower Place
8 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton, HM08
Bermuda
(441) 292-1510
98-0363970
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES
þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
The number of common shares, par value $.001 per share, outstanding as of July 29, 2009 was
284,040,728. In addition, our subsidiary, Nabors Exchangeco (Canada) Inc., had 101,392
exchangeable shares outstanding as of July 29, 2009 that are exchangeable for Nabors common shares
on a one-for-one basis, and have essentially identical rights as Nabors Industries Ltd. common
shares, including but not limited to voting rights and the right to receive dividends, if any.
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Page No. | ||||||||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
40 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
58 | ||||||||
58 | ||||||||
59 | ||||||||
60 | ||||||||
61 | ||||||||
EX-15 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
2
Table of Contents
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,023,653 | $ | 442,087 | ||||
Short-term investments |
172,787 | 142,158 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
787,653 | 1,160,768 | ||||||
Inventory |
134,017 | 150,118 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
22,837 | 28,083 | ||||||
Other current assets |
161,214 | 243,379 | ||||||
Total current assets |
2,302,161 | 2,166,593 | ||||||
Long-term investments and other receivables |
140,101 | 239,952 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
7,621,186 | 7,331,959 | ||||||
Goodwill |
162,812 | 175,749 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
433,955 | 411,727 | ||||||
Other long-term assets |
209,147 | 191,919 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 10,869,362 | $ | 10,517,899 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 168,699 | $ | 225,030 | ||||
Trade accounts payable |
262,545 | 424,908 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
367,005 | 367,393 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
46,250 | 111,528 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
844,499 | 1,128,859 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
4,063,288 | 3,600,533 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
267,178 | 261,878 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
646,573 | 622,523 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
5,821,538 | 5,613,793 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common shares, par value $.001 per share: |
||||||||
Authorized common shares 800,000; issued 312,441 and 312,343, respectively |
312 | 312 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
2,226,694 | 2,129,415 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
167,775 | 53,520 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
3,630,916 | 3,698,732 | ||||||
Less: treasury shares, at cost, 29,414 common shares |
(977,873 | ) | (977,873 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
5,047,824 | 4,904,106 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 10,869,362 | $ | 10,517,899 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
(As Adjusted) | (As Adjusted) | |||||||||||||||
Revenues and other income: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 867,869 | $ | 1,282,400 | $ | 2,065,914 | $ | 2,582,258 | ||||||||
Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates |
(8,127 | ) | (4,033 | ) | (72,554 | ) | (8,484 | ) | ||||||||
Investment income |
18,248 | 25,057 | 27,389 | 51,239 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues and other income |
877,990 | 1,303,424 | 2,020,749 | 2,625,013 | ||||||||||||
Costs and other deductions: |
||||||||||||||||
Direct costs |
453,922 | 740,178 | 1,119,209 | 1,487,948 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
163,808 | 116,914 | 271,151 | 228,235 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
165,974 | 148,813 | 325,126 | 285,013 | ||||||||||||
Depletion |
2,590 | 7,343 | 5,343 | 21,028 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
66,027 | 49,375 | 133,105 | 96,067 | ||||||||||||
Losses (gains) on sales and retirements of long-lived assets
and other expense (income), net |
6,469 | 3,158 | (10,828 | ) | 11,255 | |||||||||||
Impairments and other charges |
227,083 | | 227,083 | | ||||||||||||
Total costs and other deductions |
1,085,873 | 1,065,781 | 2,070,189 | 2,129,546 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(207,883 | ) | 237,643 | (49,440 | ) | 495,467 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit): |
||||||||||||||||
Current |
(43,425 | ) | 39,759 | 6,032 | 139,052 | |||||||||||
Deferred |
28,528 | 21,471 | 12,344 | (32,042 | ) | |||||||||||
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
(14,897 | ) | 61,230 | 18,376 | 107,010 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (192,986 | ) | $ | 176,413 | $ | (67,816 | ) | $ | 388,457 | ||||||
Earnings (losses) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (.68 | ) | $ | .63 | $ | (.24 | ) | $ | 1.38 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | (.68 | ) | $ | .60 | $ | (.24 | ) | $ | 1.34 | ||||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
283,154 | 280,851 | 283,126 | 280,508 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
283,154 | 294,487 | 283,126 | 290,133 |
The details of credit related impairments to investments and reconciliation to Impairments and
other charges are presented below:
Three and Six Months | ||||||||
Ended | ||||||||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2009 | |||||||
Gross impairments before credit related
impairment |
$ | 191,434 | ||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment |
$ | 40,300 | ||||||
Less other-than-temporary impairment
recognized in other comprehensive income
(loss) |
(4,651 | ) | ||||||
Credit related impairment on investment |
35,649 | |||||||
Impairments and other charges (Note 3) |
$ | 227,083 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
(As adjusted) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (67,816 | ) | $ | 388,457 | |||
Adjustments to net income: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
325,126 | 285,013 | ||||||
Depletion |
5,343 | 21,028 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
12,344 | (32,042 | ) | |||||
Deferred financing costs amortization |
3,279 | 4,356 | ||||||
Pension liability amortization and adjustments |
99 | 142 | ||||||
Discount amortization on long-term debt |
45,947 | 65,756 | ||||||
Amortization of loss on hedges |
290 | 263 | ||||||
Impairments and other charges |
227,083 | | ||||||
Losses on long-lived assets, net |
6,886 | 10,407 | ||||||
Gains on investments, net |
(13,594 | ) | (28,203 | ) | ||||
Gains on debt retirement, net |
(15,969 | ) | | |||||
Gains on derivative instruments |
(968 | ) | (157 | ) | ||||
Share-based compensation |
99,662 | 19,904 | ||||||
Foreign currency transaction losses (gains), net |
690 | (725 | ) | |||||
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates, net of dividends |
81,053 | 15,232 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
379,283 | (59,492 | ) | |||||
Inventory |
16,888 | 6,152 | ||||||
Other current assets |
83,530 | (43,555 | ) | |||||
Other long-term assets |
(21,735 | ) | (14,020 | ) | ||||
Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(99,039 | ) | (55,954 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable |
(76,675 | ) | 38,961 | |||||
Other long-term liabilities |
15,608 | 10,472 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,007,315 | 631,995 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of investments |
(22,614 | ) | (190,509 | ) | ||||
Sales and maturities of investments |
39,592 | 399,669 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
(100,670 | ) | (47,452 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures |
(710,849 | ) | (751,825 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of assets and insurance claims |
12,791 | 16,998 | ||||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(781,750 | ) | (573,119 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash overdrafts |
(15,715 | ) | 15,771 | |||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
1,124,978 | 575,219 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
(8,699 | ) | (4,460 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
549 | 53,587 | ||||||
Reduction in long-term debt |
(745,212 | ) | (171,788 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of equity component of convertible debt |
(1,541 | ) | | |||||
Repurchase of common shares |
| (150,114 | ) | |||||
Purchase of restricted stock |
(1,496 | ) | (11,667 | ) | ||||
Tax benefit related to the exercise of stock options |
105 | 4,771 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
352,969 | 311,319 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
3,032 | 2,320 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
581,566 | 372,515 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
442,087 | 531,306 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 1,023,653 | $ | 903,821 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Shares | Capital in | (losses) on | Cumulative | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Par | Excess of | Marketable | Translation | Retained | Treasury | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Shares | Value | Par Value | Securities | Adjustment | Other | Earnings | Shares | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31,
2008, as adjusted |
312,343 | $ | 312 | $ | 2,129,415 | $ | (36,960 | ) | $ | 95,782 | $ | (5,302 | ) | $ | 3,698,732 | $ | (977,873 | ) | $ | 4,904,106 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
(loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
(67,816 | ) | (67,816 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment |
44,317 | 44,317 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains/(losses)
on marketable securities,
net of income tax benefit
of $1,015 |
41,918 | 41,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains/(losses)
on adjusted basis for
marketable debt security, net of income tax benefit of $1,767 |
(2,884 | ) | (2,884 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: reclassification
adjustment for (gains)/
losses included in net
loss, net of income tax
benefit of $4,940 |
30,752 | 30,752 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension liability
amortization, net of
income taxes of $37 |
63 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
(gains)/losses on cash
flow hedges, net of
income tax benefit of $9 |
89 | 89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
(loss) |
| | | 69,786 | 44,317 | 152 | (67,816 | ) | | 46,439 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares
for stock options exercised |
91 | 549 | 549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors Exchangeco shares
exchanged |
3 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of equity
component of convertible
debt |
(1,541 | ) | (1,541 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit related to
stock option exercises |
105 | 105 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards, net |
4 | (1,496 | ) | (1,496 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
99,662 | 99,662 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
98 | | 97,279 | | | | | | 97,279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances, June 30, 2009 |
312,441 | $ | 312 | $ | 2,226,694 | $ | 32,826 | $ | 140,099 | $ | (5,150 | ) | $ | 3,630,916 | $ | (977,873 | ) | $ | 5,047,824 | |||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Shares | Capital in | (Losses) on | Cumulative | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Par | Excess of | Marketable | Translation | Retained | Treasury | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Shares | Value | Par Value | Securities | Adjustment | Other | Earnings | Shares | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31,
2007, as adjusted |
305,458 | $ | 305 | $ | 2,133,579 | $ | 281 | $ | 324,647 | $ | (2,293 | ) | $ | 3,222,995 | $ | (877,935 | ) | $ | 4,801,579 | |||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
(loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
388,457 | 388,457 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment |
(29,954 | ) | (29,954 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on
marketable securities,
net of income taxes of
$723 |
107,154 | 107,154 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: reclassification
adjustment for gains
included in net
income, net of income
taxes of $270 |
(687 | ) | (687 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension liability
amortization, net of
income taxes of $54 |
88 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain and
amortization of
(gains) losses on cash
flow hedges, net of
income taxes of $253 |
476 | 476 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive
income (loss) |
| | | 106,467 | (29,954 | ) | 564 | 388,457 | | 465,534 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares
for stock options exercised |
2,341 | 2 | 53,585 | 53,587 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors Exchangeco shares
exchanged |
14 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 468 treasury
shares related to
conversion of notes |
(16,146 | ) | 16,146 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of 3,650
treasury shares |
(150,114 | ) | (150,114 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit related to stock option exercises |
5,884 | 5,884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards, net |
1,583 | 2 | (11,669 | ) | (11,667 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
19,904 | 19,904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
3,938 | 4 | 51,558 | | | | | (133,968 | ) | (82,406 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances, June 30, 2008, as
adjusted |
309,396 | $ | 309 | $ | 2,185,137 | $ | 106,748 | $ | 294,693 | $ | (1,729 | ) | $ | 3,611,452 | $ | (1,011,903 | ) | $ | 5,184,707 | |||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
Nabors Industries Ltd. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Nature of Operations
Nabors is the largest land drilling contractor in the world, with approximately 531 actively
marketed land drilling rigs. We conduct oil, gas and geothermal land drilling operations in the
U.S. Lower 48 states, Alaska, Canada, South America, Mexico, the Caribbean, the Middle East, the
Far East, Russia and Africa. We are also one of the largest land well-servicing and workover
contractors in the United States and Canada. We actively market approximately 594 land workover and
well-servicing rigs in the United States, primarily in the southwestern and western United States,
and actively market approximately 172 land workover and well-servicing rigs in Canada. Nabors is a
leading provider of offshore platform workover and drilling rigs, and actively markets 40 platform
rigs, 13 jack-up units and 3 barge rigs in the United States and multiple international markets.
These rigs provide well-servicing, workover and drilling services. We have a 51% ownership interest
in a joint venture in Saudi Arabia, which owns and actively markets 9 rigs in addition to the rigs
we lease to the joint venture. We also offer a wide range of ancillary well-site services,
including engineering, transportation, construction, maintenance, well logging, directional
drilling, rig instrumentation, data collection and other support services in selected domestic and
international markets. We provide logistics services for onshore drilling in Canada using
helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. We manufacture and lease or sell top drives for a broad range
of drilling applications, directional drilling systems, rig instrumentation and data collection
equipment, pipeline handling equipment and rig reporting software. We also invest in oil and gas
exploration, development and production activities in the U.S., Canada and international areas
through both our wholly-owned subsidiaries and our separate joint venture entities in which we have
49.7% ownership interests in the U.S. and international entities and a 50% ownership interest in
the Canadian entity. Each joint venture pursues development and exploration projects with both
existing customers of ours and with other operators in a variety of forms including operated and
non-operated working interests, joint ventures, farm-outs and acquisitions.
The majority of our business is conducted through our various Contract Drilling operating
segments, which include our drilling, workover and well-servicing operations, on land and offshore.
Our oil and gas exploration, development and production operations are included in a category
labeled Oil and Gas for segment reporting purposes. Our operating segments engaged in drilling
technology and top drive manufacturing, directional drilling, rig instrumentation and software, and
construction and logistics operations are aggregated in a category labeled Other Operating Segments
for segment reporting purposes.
Effective January 1, 2009, Nabors changed its method of accounting for certain of its
convertible debt instruments in accordance with Financial Staff Position (FSP) APB No. 14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including
Partial Cash Settlement). Additionally, Nabors changed its method for calculating its basic and
diluted earnings per share using the two-class method in accordance with EITF 03-6-1, Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, Accounting Changes and
Error Corrections, financial information and earnings per share calculations for prior periods
have been adjusted to reflect retrospective application of the FSP and EITF. See Notes 7 and 11
for additional information.
As used in the Report, we, us, our, the Company and Nabors means Nabors Industries
Ltd. and, where the context requires, includes our subsidiaries and Nabors Delaware means Nabors
Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation and our subsidiary.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Interim Financial Information
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Nabors are prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior period to conform to the current period presentation,
with no effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements
prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, these financial statements should
be read along with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended,
and Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2009. In our
managements opinion, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to
present fairly our financial position as of June 30, 2009, the results of our operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and our cash flows for the six
8
Table of Contents
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, in accordance with GAAP. Interim results for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 may not be indicative of results that will be realized for the
full year ending December 31, 2009.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has performed a review of, and issued a
report on, these consolidated interim financial statements in accordance with standards established
by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), this report should not be considered a part of any
registration statement prepared or certified within the meanings of Sections 7 and 11 of the
Securities Act.
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through July 31, 2009, up to
the time of
filing this Form 10-Q with the SEC.
Principles of Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Nabors, all majority owned and
non-majority owned subsidiaries required to be consolidated under Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46R). Our consolidated financial statements exclude
majority-owned entities for which we do not have either (1) the ability to control the operating
and financial decisions and policies of that entity or (2) a controlling financial interest in a
variable interest entity. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in
consolidation.
Investments in operating entities where we have the ability to exert significant influence,
but where we do not control operating and financial policies, are accounted for using the equity
method. Our share of the net income of these entities is recorded as earnings (losses) from
unconsolidated affiliates in our consolidated statements of income (loss), and our investment in
these entities is included as a single amount in our consolidated balance sheets. Investments in
unconsolidated affiliates accounted for using the equity method totaled $433.1 million and $410.8
million and investments in unconsolidated affiliates accounted for using the cost method totaled
$.9 million as of each of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Similarly, investments in certain
offshore funds classified as non-marketable are accounted for using the equity method of accounting
based on our ownership interest in each fund. Our share of the gains and losses of these funds is
recorded in investment income in our consolidated statements of income (loss), and our investments
in these funds are included in long-term investments and other receivables in our consolidated
balance sheets.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements for assets and liabilities. We adopted and
applied the provisions of SFAS No. 157 to our financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008
and our nonfinancial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009. The impact of SFAS No. 157 is
provided in Note 5.
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. This statement
retains the fundamental requirement in SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations that the acquisition
method of accounting be used for all business combinations and expands the same method of
accounting to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or
more other businesses or assets at the acquisition date and in subsequent periods. This statement
replaces SFAS No. 141 by requiring measurement at the acquisition date of the fair value of assets
acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interests. Additionally, SFAS No. 141(R)
requires that acquisition-related costs, including restructuring costs, be recognized as expense
separately from the acquisition. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009
and will apply it to future acquisitions.
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement establishes the accounting and
reporting standards for a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. This statement clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership
interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. SFAS No. 160 requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure
requirements for existing minority interests and applies prospectively to business combinations for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008 the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment to FASB Statement No. 133. This statement is intended to improve
financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced
qualitative and quantitative disclosures regarding derivative instruments, gains and losses on such
instruments and their effects on an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008, and interim periods within
9
Table of Contents
those fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009 did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008 the FASB issued FSP APB No. 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments
That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). This FSP
clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including
partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, Accounting for
Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants. Effective January 1, 2009, we
adopted the provisions of this FSP and applied them, on a retrospective basis, to our consolidated
financial statements. The impact of this FSP is provided in Note 7.
In June 2008 the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. This EITF provides that securities
which are granted in share-based transactions are participating securities prior to vesting if
they have a nonforfeitable right to participate in any dividends, and such securities therefore
should be included in computing basic earnings per share. Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted
the provisions of this EITF and applied them, on a retrospective basis, to our consolidated
financial statements. The impact of this EITF is provided in Note 11.
In December 2008 the SEC issued a Final Rule, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting. This
Final Rule revises certain oil and gas reporting disclosures in Regulation S-K and Regulation S-X
under the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), as well as
Industry Guide 2. The amendments are designed to modernize and update oil and gas disclosure
requirements to align them with current practices and changes in technology. Additionally, this
new accounting standard requires that entities use trailing twelve month average natural gas and
oil prices when performing the full cost ceiling test calculation. The disclosure requirements are
effective for registration statements filed on or after January 1, 2010 and for annual financial
statements filed on or after December 31, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that this
Final Rule may have on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.
This FSP provides additional guidance for determining whether a market for a financial asset is not
active and a transaction is not distressed for fair value measurements under SFAS No. 157. The
requirements of this FSP are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted the provisions of this FSP as of April 1, 2009 and
have applied them to our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009.
In April 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 115-2 and SFAS No. 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. This FSP changes the method for determining
whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists with respect to debt securities. The
requirements of this FSP are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted the provisions of this FSP as of April 1, 2009 and
have applied them to our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009. The impact of this FSP is provided in Notes 3 and 4.
In April 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This FSP increases the frequency of fair value disclosures
required by SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments from annual only
to quarterly reporting periods. The requirements of this FSP are effective for financial statements
issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The provisions of this FSP have
been applied to our consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2009. The impact of this FSP is
provided in Note 5.
In June 2009 the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, which requires entities to
disclose the date through which they have evaluated subsequent events and whether the date
corresponds with the release of their financial statements. The requirements of SFAS No. 165 are
effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. SFAS No. 165 did not have any
impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
10
Table of Contents
Note 3 Impairments and other charges
The following table provides the components of impairments and other charges recorded during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009:
For the three and six months | ||||||||
ended | ||||||||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2009 | |||||||
Goodwill impairment (1) |
$ | 14,689 | ||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets to be disposed of
other than by sale, by operating segment: (2) |
||||||||
U.S. Offshore |
$ | 28,062 | ||||||
Alaska |
15,000 | |||||||
Canada |
17,930 | |||||||
International |
3,237 | |||||||
Total impairment of long-lived assets to be
disposed of other than by sale |
64,229 | |||||||
Impairment of oil and gas financing receivable (3) |
112,516 | |||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment (4) |
$ | 40,300 | ||||||
Less other-than-temporary impairment recognized
in other comprehensive income (loss) |
(4,651 | ) | ||||||
Credit related impairment on investment |
35,649 | |||||||
Total impairments and other charges |
$ | 227,083 | ||||||
(1) | During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized goodwill impairment of approximately $14.7 million relating to Nabors Blue Sky Ltd., one of our Canadian subsidiaries reported in our Other Operating segments. The impairment charge was a result of our annual impairment test on goodwill which compared the estimated fair value of each of our reporting units to its carrying value. The estimated fair value of Nabors Blue Sky Ltd. was determined using discounted cash flow models involving assumptions based on our utilization of aircraft and revenues as well as direct costs, general and administrative costs, depreciation, applicable income taxes, capital expenditures and working capital requirements. We determined that the fair value estimated for purposes of this test represented a Level 3 fair value measurement. During the year ended December 31, 2008, goodwill impairment of $4.6 million was recognized by this reporting unit. The current quarter non-cash pre-tax impairment charge was deemed necessary due to the continued deterioration during the quarter, and a now longer than previously expected duration of the downturn in the oil and gas industry in Canada and the lack of certainty regarding eventual recovery in the value of these operations. This downturn has resulted in reduced capital spending on the part of our customers and has diminished demand for our drilling services and for immediate access to remote drilling sites. The goodwill recorded in our Nabors Blue Sky Ltd. reporting unit was fully impaired as of June 30, 2009, and as such, is not subject to further impairment. A significantly prolonged period of lower oil and natural gas prices could continue to adversely affect the demand for and prices of our services, which could result in future goodwill impairment charges for other reporting units due to the potential impact on our estimate of our future operating results. See Note 2 (included under the caption Goodwill) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for additional discussion and amounts of goodwill related to each of our reporting units. | |
(2) | During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we retired certain rigs and rig components in our U.S. Offshore, Alaska, Canada and International Contract Drilling segments and reduced their aggregate carrying value from $69.0 million to their estimated aggregate salvage value, resulting in impairment charges of approximately $64.2 million. The retirements included certain inactive workover jack-up rigs in our U.S. Offshore and International operations, the structural frames of certain incomplete coiled tubing rigs in our Canada operations and miscellaneous rig components in our Alaska operations. The impairment charges resulted from the continued deterioration during the quarter, and a now longer than previously expected duration of the downturn in the demand for oil and gas drilling activities. During the quarter, uncertainty increased with respect to the timing of a market upturn of sufficient magnitude to return the affected assets to service in the foreseeable future. As a result of these factors, we made the decision to retire these assets. A prolonged period of lower natural gas and oil prices and its potential impact on our utilization and dayrates could result in the recognition of future impairment charges on additional rigs if future cash flow estimates, based upon information then available to management, indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. |
11
Table of Contents
(3) | As of June 30, 2009, we recorded an impairment totaling $112.5 million to a certain oil and gas financing receivable, which reduced the carrying value of our oil and gas financing receivables recorded as long-term investments to $128.1 million. The impairment was primarily due to commodity price deterioration and a longer than expected duration of the lower price environment during the second quarter. This is expected to significantly reduce demand for future gas production and development in the Barnett Shale area of north central Texas, which significantly influences capital expenditure decisions in the future. The impairment was determined using discounted cash flow models involving assumptions based on estimated cash flows for proved and probable reserves, undeveloped acreage value, and current and expected natural gas prices. We believe the estimates used provide a reasonable estimate of current fair value. We determined that this represented a Level 3 fair value measurement. | |
(4) | During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $40.3 million to a debt security issued by MBIA Insurance Inc. The credit loss related to the other-than-temporary impairment was $35.6 million and the remaining $4.7 million was recorded as an unrealized loss in accumulated comprehensive income (loss) in our consolidated statements of changes in shareholders equity for the six months ended June 30, 2009. These bonds were downgraded to non-investment grade level by Standard and Poors and Moodys Investors Service as of June 30, 2009. The impairment of this investment was evaluated based on a variety of factors, including the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost, the financial condition of the issuer of the security as well as credit ratings and the recent reorganization by MBIA Inc. While we do not intend to or anticipate the need to sell the investment in the future for cash flow or working capital requirements, we currently believe that we may not collect the full amounts due according to the contractual terms of the investment. |
Note 4 Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments
Our cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments and other receivables
consisted of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,023,653 | $ | 442,087 | ||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||
Trading equity securities |
27,285 | 14,263 | ||||||
Available-for-sale equity securities |
99,314 | 55,453 | ||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities |
46,188 | 72,442 | ||||||
Total short-term investments |
172,787 | 142,158 | ||||||
Long-term investments and other receivables |
140,101 | 239,952 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,336,541 | $ | 824,197 | ||||
As of June 30, 2009, our short-term investments consisted of investments in available-for-sale
marketable debt and equity securities of $145.5 million and trading securities of $27.3 million and
our long-term investments and other receivables consisted of $128.1 million in oil and gas
financing receivables and $12.0 million in investments in certain offshore funds accounted for
using the equity method. The oil and gas financing receivables represent our financing agreements
for certain production payment contracts in our Oil and Gas segment. Income and gains associated
with our oil and gas financing receivables are recognized as operating revenues. See Note 3 for
discussion of an impairment charge recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2009 related to
a certain oil and gas financing receivable.
As of December 31, 2008, our short-term investments consisted of investments in
available-for-sale marketable debt and equity securities of $127.9 million and trading securities
of $14.3 million and our long-term investments and other receivables consisted of investments of
$224.2 million in oil and gas financing receivables and $15.7 million in investments in offshore
funds accounted for using the equity method.
12
Table of Contents
Certain information related to our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
follows:
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2009 | ||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||
Fair | Holding | Holding | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | Value | Gains | Losses | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,023,653 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||||||
Trading equity securities |
27,285 | 21,561 | | |||||||||
Available-for-sale equity securities |
99,314 | 59,191 | (22,339 | ) | ||||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities: |
||||||||||||
Commercial paper and CDs |
1,034 | | | |||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
30,562 | 1 | (4,679 | ) | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed debt securities |
941 | 21 | (76 | ) | ||||||||
Mortgage-CMO debt securities |
8,866 | 124 | (307 | ) | ||||||||
Asset-backed debt securities |
4,785 | | (1,205 | ) | ||||||||
Total available-for-sale debt securities |
46,188 | 146 | (6,267 | ) | ||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities |
145,502 | 59,337 | (28,606 | ) | ||||||||
Total short-term investments |
172,787 | 80,898 | (28,606 | ) | ||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments |
$ | 1,196,440 | $ | 80,898 | $ | (28,606 | ) | |||||
Certain information related to the gross unrealized losses of our cash and cash equivalents
and short-term investments follows:
As of June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | More Than 12 Months | |||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale equity securities (1) |
$ | 24,407 | $ | (22,339 | ) | $ | | $ | | |||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities: (2) |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
24,700 | (4,651 | ) | 5,365 | (28 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed debt securities |
| | 247 | (76 | ) | |||||||||||
Mortgage-CMO debt securities |
195 | (2 | ) | 2,172 | (305 | ) | ||||||||||
Asset-backed debt securities |
| | 4,785 | (1,205 | ) | |||||||||||
Total available-for-sale debt securities |
24,895 | (4,653 | ) | 12,569 | (1,614 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 49,302 | $ | (26,992 | ) | $ | 12,569 | $ | (1,614 | ) | ||||||
(1) | Our unrealized loss on investments in available-for-sale equity securities primarily relates to a single investment recorded at approximately $45 million. The severity of the impairment and the duration of the impairment, which as of June 30, 2009 has been less than nine months, correlate with the deteriorating global economic environment during late 2008. As of June 30, 2009, we do not consider this investment to be other than temporarily impaired as a result of the decline in its trading price per share. If the market price of this security continues to be below our cost basis for a prolonged period, our future evaluation whether this security has experienced impairment could result in an other-than-temporary impairment charge. | |
(2) | Our unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities held for more than one year are comprised of various types of securities, four of which have experienced impairment greater than $.1 million and together represent approximately $1.6 million or 92%, of the gross unrealized losses. Each of these four securities have a rating ranging from A to AAA from Standard & Poors and ranging from A2 to Aaa from Moodys Investors Service and is considered of high credit quality. In each case, we do not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the investments to generate our own cash flow and working capital requirements. We believe that we will be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of each investment and, therefore, do not consider the decline in value of these investments to be other than temporary at June 30, 2009. |
13
Table of Contents
The estimated fair values of our corporate, mortgage-backed, mortgage-CMO and asset-backed
debt securities at June 30, 2009, classified by time to contractual maturity, are shown below.
Expected maturities differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may
have the right to repay obligations without prepayment penalties and we may elect to sell the
securities prior to the contractual maturity date.
Estimated | ||||
Fair Value | ||||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2009 | |||
Debt securities: |
||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 5,600 | ||
Due after one year through five years |
1,355 | |||
Due in more than five years |
39,233 | |||
Total debt securities |
$ | 46,188 | ||
Certain information regarding our debt and equity securities is presented below:
Six Months Ended | ||||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2009 | |||
Available-for-sale: |
||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities |
$ | 18,675 | ||
Realized gains (losses), net |
(35,692 | ) (1) |
(1) | Includes the net credit loss of an other-than-temporary impairment of $35.6 million related to a corporate debt security. |
Note 5 Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, which among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities
carried at fair value.
As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an
asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date (exit price). We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks
inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market
corroborated, or generally unobservable. We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair
value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best information available. Accordingly, we utilize
valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs. The use of unobservable inputs is intended to allow for fair value
determinations in situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or
liability at the measurement date. We are able to classify fair value balances based on the
observability of those inputs. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy such that Level 1
measurements include unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an
active market, Level 2 measurements include quoted market prices for identical assets or
liabilities in an active market that have been adjusted for items such as effects of restrictions
for transferability and those that are not quoted but are observable through corroboration with
observable market data, including quoted market prices for similar assets, and Level 3 measurements
include those that are unobservable and of a subjective measure.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, our financial assets
and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009. As
required by SFAS No. 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based
on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Fair Value as of June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Recurring Fair Value Measurements | Level | Level | Level | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 1 | 2 | 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale equity securities |
$ | 99,314 | $ | | $ | | $ | 99,314 | ||||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities |
10,432 | 35,756 | | 46,188 | ||||||||||||
Trading securities |
27,285 | | | 27,285 | ||||||||||||
Total investments |
$ | 137,031 | $ | 35,756 | $ | | $ | 172,787 | ||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative contract |
$ | | $ | 3,116 | $ | | $ | 3,116 | ||||||||
14
Table of Contents
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 with respect to our
nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis, which consists primarily of
goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
a business combination and asset retirement obligations. Refer to Note 3 for additional
discussion.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of our financial instruments has been estimated in accordance with the
framework in SFAS No. 157. The fair value of our fixed rate long-term debt is estimated based on
quoted market prices or prices quoted from third-party financial institutions. The carrying and
fair values of our long-term debt, including the current portion, are as follows:
June 30, 2009 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | Carrying Value | Fair Value | ||||||
$1.125 billion 9.25% senior notes due January 2019 |
$ | 1,125,000 | $ | 1,296,371 | ||||
$975 million 6.15% senior notes due February 2018 |
964,462 | 928,951 | ||||||
$2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes due May 2011 |
1,699,957 | 1,740,474 | ||||||
5.375% senior notes due August 2012 (1) |
273,036 | 278,575 | ||||||
4.875% senior notes due August 2009 |
168,399 | 168,400 | ||||||
Other |
1,133 | 1,133 | ||||||
$ | 4,231,987 | $ | 4,413,904 | |||||
(1) | Includes $1.3 million as of June 30, 2009 related to the unamortized loss on the interest rate swap that was unwound during the fourth quarter of 2005. |
The fair values of our cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables approximate
their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
As of June 30, 2009, our short-term investments were carried at fair market value and included
$145.5 million and $27.3 million in securities classified as available-for-sale and trading,
respectively. The carrying values of our long-term investments that are accounted for using the
equity method of accounting approximate fair value. The fair value of these long-term investments
totaled $12.0 million as of June 30, 2009. The carrying value of our oil and gas financing
receivables included in long-term investments approximate fair value.
Note 6 Share-Based Compensation
The Company has several share-based employee compensation plans, which are more fully
described in Note 4 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company awarded 9,981,850 stock options which
vest over varying periods up to four years to its employees and executive officers. These awards
include 3.0 million and 1.7 million stock options, with a grant date fair value of $8.8 million and
$5.0 million granted, to Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello, respectively, in February 2009.
The fair value of stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009 was
calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following weighted-average
assumptions:
Weighted average fair value of options granted: |
$ | 2.84 | ||
Weighted average risk free interest rate: |
1.75 | % | ||
Dividend yield: |
0.0 | % | ||
Volatility: (1) |
34.78 | % | ||
Expected life: |
4 years |
(1) | Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities from publicly traded options to purchase Nabors common shares, historical volatility of Nabors common shares and other factors. |
15
Table of Contents
There were no stock options granted and, as a result, no fair value determinations made during
the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 was $.4 million and $41.3 million, respectively. The total fair value of options that vested
during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $9.4 million and $4.1 million, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company awarded 84,000 shares of restricted
stock to its directors. These awards had an aggregate value at their date of grant of $1.0 million
and will vest over a period of three years. The fair value of restricted stock that vested during
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $18.1 million and $36.9 million, respectively.
Total share-based compensation expense, which includes both stock options and restricted
stock, totaled $76.3 million and $10.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $99.7 million and $19.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Share-based compensation expense has been allocated to our various operating
segments. See Note 14.
Included in the total share-based compensation expense discussed above for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized $72.1 million of compensation expense related to
previously granted restricted stock and option awards held by Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello that
was unrecognized as of April 1, 2009. The recognition of this expense was a result of the
provisions of their respective new employment agreements which effectively eliminated the risk of
forfeiture of such awards. See Note 10 for additional information.
Note 7 Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
$2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes due May 2011 |
$ | 1,699,957 | $ | 2,362,822 | ||||
$1.125 billion
6.15% senior notes due January 2019 |
1,125,000 | | ||||||
$975 million, 6.15% senior notes due February 2018 |
964,462 | 963,859 | ||||||
5.375% senior notes due August 2012 |
273,036 | 272,724 | ||||||
4.875% senior notes due August 2009 |
168,399 | 224,829 | ||||||
Other |
1,133 | 1,329 | ||||||
4,231,987 | 3,825,563 | |||||||
Less: current portion |
168,699 | 225,030 | ||||||
$ | 4,063,288 | $ | 3,600,533 | |||||
Prior to January 1, 2009, we accounted for the embedded conversion option in our convertible
long-term debt following the recognition and measurement principles under APB Opinion No. 14,
Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants and EITF 90-19,
Convertible Bonds with Issuer Option to Settle for Cash upon Conversion. Under this
authoritative guidance, separate accounting for the embedded conversion option was not required
when the conversion spread feature did not qualify to be accounted for as a derivative instrument.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB FSP APB No. 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). The
FSP clarifies the position that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon
conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No.
14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants. The FSP
requires that convertible debt instruments be accounted for with a liability component based on the
fair value of a similar nonconvertible debt instrument and an equity component based on the excess
of the initial proceeds from the convertible debt instrument over the liability component. Such
excess represents proceeds related to the conversion option and is recorded as capital in excess of
par value. The liability is recorded at a discount, which is then amortized as additional non-cash
interest expense over the convertible debt instruments expected life. Our adoption of this FSP has
been applied retrospectively to all past periods presented for all convertible debt instruments
within its scope. Both our $2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes issued May 2006 and our
$700 million zero coupon senior exchangeable notes issued June 2003 are within the scope of this
FSP.
Under the provisions of this FSP the following assumptions were made in our adoption:
16
Table of Contents
$700 million zero | ||||||||
coupon senior | $2.75 billion 0.94% senior | |||||||
Assumptions | exchangeable notes | exchangeable notes | ||||||
Date of issue |
June 2003 | May 2006 | ||||||
Expected maturity date |
June 2008 | May 2011 | ||||||
Amortization period |
5 years | 5 years | ||||||
Nonconvertible debt borrowing rate |
2.8 | % | 6.1 | % | ||||
Tax rate over term of debt |
37 | % | 37 | % |
Conversion Triggers | ||
$700 million zero coupon senior
exchangeable notes
|
In May 2008 Nabors Delaware called for redemption of all of its $700 million zero coupon senior exchangeable notes due 2023. The total amount paid to effect the redemption and related exchange was $700 million in cash and the issuance of approximately 5.25 million of our common shares with a fair value of $249.8 million, the price equal to the principal amount of the notes plus the excess of the exchange value of the notes over their principal amount. | |
$2.75 billion 0.94% senior
exchangeable notes (1)
|
The notes are exchangeable into cash and, if applicable, Nabors common shares based on an exchange rate of the equivalent value of 21.8221 Nabors common shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes (which is equal to an initial exchange price of approximately $45.83 per share), subject to adjustment during the 30 calendar days ending at the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date. | |
The number of shares that we would be required to issue upon exchange consists only of the incremental shares that would be issued above the principal amount of the notes, as we are required to pay cash up to the principal amount of the notes exchanged. There would be an if-converted value in excess of the principal amount of the notes only when the price of our shares exceeds $45.83 as of the last trading day of the quarter and the average price of our shares for the ten consecutive trading days beginning on the third business day after the last trading day of the quarter exceeds $45.83. |
(1) | Nabors Delaware entered into exchangeable note hedge transactions with respect to our common shares. The call options are designed to cover, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, the net number of our common shares that would be deliverable to exchanging noteholders in the event of an exchange of the notes. Nabors Delaware paid an aggregate amount of approximately $583.6 million of the proceeds from the sale of the notes to acquire the call options. | |
Nabors also entered into separate warrant transactions at the time of the sale of the notes whereby we sold warrants which give the holders the right to acquire approximately 60.0 million of our common shares at a strike price of $54.64 per share. On exercise of the warrants, we have the option to deliver cash or our common shares equal to the difference between the then market price and strike price. All of the warrants will be exercisable and will expire on August 15, 2011. We received aggregate proceeds of approximately $421.2 million from the sale of the warrants and used $353.4 million of the proceeds to purchase 10.0 million of Nabors common shares. | ||
The purchased call options and sold warrants are separate contracts entered into by Nabors and Nabors Delaware with two financial institutions and are not part of the terms of the notes and will not affect the holders rights under the notes. The purchased call options are expected to offset the potential dilution upon exchange of the notes in the event that the market value per share of our common shares at the time of exercise is greater than the strike price of the purchased call options, which corresponds to the initial exchange price of the notes and is simultaneously subject to certain customary adjustments. The warrants will effectively increase the exchange price of the notes to $54.64 per share of our common shares, from the perspective of Nabors, representing a 55% premium based on the last reported bid price of $35.25 per share on May 17, 2006. In accordance with EITF 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed To and Potentially Settled In a Companys Own Stock and SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, we recorded the exchangeable note hedge and warrants in capital in excess of par value as of the transaction date, and will not recognize subsequent changes in fair value. |
17
Table of Contents
The effect of the adoption of FSP APB No. 14-1 on our previously reported consolidated
balance sheet is as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2008 | ||||||||||||
As previously | Effect of | As currently | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | reported | change | reported | |||||||||
Increase (Decrease): | ||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 7,282,042 | $ | 49,917 | $ | 7,331,959 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
3,887,711 | (287,178 | ) | 3,600,533 | ||||||||
Deferred income tax liability |
497,415 | 125,108 | 622,523 | |||||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
1,705,907 | 423,508 | 2,129,415 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
3,910,253 | (211,521 | ) | 3,698,732 |
The increase to deferred income tax liabilities was partially related to a reduction of a
deferred tax asset of $215.9 million which had been previously recorded in the second quarter of
2006 for the effect of the future tax benefits related to the exchangeable note hedge.
The effect of the adoption of FSP APB No. 14-1 on our previously reported consolidated
statements of income is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 | June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
As | As | As | As | |||||||||||||||||||||
previously | Effect of | currently | previously | Effect of | currently | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | reported | change | reported | reported | change | reported | ||||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
$ | 148,023 | $ | 790 | $ | 148,813 | $ | 283,501 | $ | 1,512 | $ | 285,013 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
21,676 | 27,699 | 49,375 | 39,785 | 56,282 | 96,067 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
71,771 | (10,541 | ) | 61,230 | 128,394 | (21,384 | ) | 107,010 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
194,361 | (17,948 | ) | 176,413 | 424,867 | (36,410 | ) | 388,457 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share diluted |
$ | .67 | $ | (.07 | ) | $ | .60 | $ | 1.48 | $ | (.14 | ) | $ | 1.34 | ||||||||||
Weighted-average number of shares
outstanding |
291,454 | 3,033 | (1) | 294,487 | (1) | 287,407 | 2,726 | (1) | 290,133 | (1) |
(1) | Includes adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1. See Note 11. |
The following information is presented for comparative purposes and illustrates the effect of
FSP APB No. 14-1 on our convertible debt instruments. The balances of the liability and equity
components as of each period presented are as follows:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Equity component net carrying value |
$ | 581,671 | $ | 583,212 | ||||
Liability component: |
||||||||
Face amount due at maturity |
$ | 1,861,469 | $ | 2,650,000 | ||||
Less: Unamortized discount |
(161,512 | ) | (287,178 | ) | ||||
Liability component net carrying value |
$ | 1,699,957 | $ | 2,362,822 | ||||
18
Table of Contents
The remaining debt discount is being amortized into interest expense over the expected
remaining life of the convertible debt instruments using the effective interest rate. Interest
expense related to the convertible debt instruments was recognized as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense on convertible
debt instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Contractual coupon interest |
$ | 4,497 | $ | 6,463 | $ | 9,818 | $ | 12,925 | ||||||||
Amortization of debt discount |
20,550 | 31,853 | 45,120 | 64,747 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
$ | 25,047 | $ | 38,316 | $ | 54,938 | $ | 77,672 | ||||||||
During 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2009 we purchased $888.5 million par value of
our $2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes in the open market, leaving approximately $1.86
billion par value outstanding.
On January 12, 2009, Nabors Delaware completed a private placement of $1.125 billion
aggregate principal amount of 9.25% senior notes due 2019 with registration rights, which are
unsecured and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by us. The issue of senior notes was resold
by the initial purchasers to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A and to certain
investors outside of the United States under Regulation S of the Securities Act. The senior notes
bear interest at a rate of 9.25% per year, payable semiannually on January 15 and July 15 of each
year, beginning July 15, 2009. The senior notes will mature on January 15, 2019.
The senior notes are unsecured and are junior in right of payment to any of Nabors Delawares
future secured debt. The senior notes rank equally with any of Nabors Delawares other existing
and future unsubordinated debt and are senior in right of payment to any of Nabors Delawares
future senior subordinated debt. Our guarantee of the senior notes is unsecured and ranks equal in
right of payment to all of our unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness from time to time
outstanding. The senior notes are subject to redemption by Nabors Delaware, in whole or in part,
at any time at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the
senior notes then outstanding to be redeemed; or (ii) the sum of the present values of the
remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest, determined in the manner set forth in the
indenture. In the event of a change in control triggering event, as defined in the indenture, the
holders of senior notes may require Nabors Delaware to purchase all or any part of each senior note
in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date
of purchase, except to the extent Nabors Delaware has exercised its right to redeem the senior
notes. Nabors Delaware is using the proceeds of the offering of the senior notes for the repayment
or repurchase of indebtedness and general corporate purposes.
On March 30, 2009, we and Nabors Delaware filed a registration statement on Form S-4 under the
Securities Act. The registration statement related to the exchange offer to noteholders required
under the registration rights agreement related to the $1.125 billion senior notes. On May 11,
2009 the registration statement was declared effective by the SEC. The exchange offer commenced on
June 17, 2009 and expired on July 17, 2009. See Note 16 for additional information.
Our $225 million
4.875% senior notes are due in August 2009 and accordingly, are
classified as a current liability. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased $56.6 million par value of these senior
notes in the open market for cash totaling $56.8 million.
Note 8 Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rate was 7.2% and (37.2%) during the three and six months ended June
30, 2009, respectively, compared to 25.8% and 21.6% during the three and six months prior year
periods. The decrease in our effective income tax rate is a result of the proportion of income
generated in the U.S. versus the international jurisdictions in which we operate. Income generated
in the U.S. is generally taxed at a higher rate than income generated in international
jurisdictions. We expect to incur a loss in the U.S. for the year which will produce a tax
benefit. Overall, we expect to have a net tax benefit for the year as the U.S. tax benefit is
expected to be in excess of the tax expenses associated with our international operations. This
will likely result in an overall negative tax rate.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions.
Internationally, income tax returns from 1995 through 2007 are currently under audit. The Company
anticipates that several of these audits could be finalized within
19
Table of Contents
12 months. It is possible that the benefit that relates to our unrecognized tax positions
could significantly increase or decrease within 12 months. However, based on the current status of
examinations, and the protocol for finalizing audits with the relevant tax authorities, which could
include formal legal proceedings, it is not possible to estimate the future impact of the amount of
changes, if any, to recorded uncertain tax positions at June 30, 2009. We recognize interest and
penalties related to income tax reserves in the income tax expense line item in our consolidated
statements of income.
The Company has recorded a deferred tax asset of approximately $1.4 billion as of June 30,
2009 relating to net operating loss carryforwards that have an indefinite life in one foreign
jurisdiction. A valuation allowance of approximately $1.4 billion has been recognized because the
Company believes it is more likely than not that none of the deferred tax asset will be realized.
Note 9 Common Shares
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we did not repurchase any of our common shares in
the open market. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 3.7 million of our
common shares in the open market for $150.1 million, all of which are held in treasury. When
shares are reissued, we use the weighted average cost method for determining cost. The difference
between the cost of the shares and the issuance price is added to or deducted from our capital in
excess of par value account.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company withheld .1 million and .4
million of our common shares with a fair value of $1.5 million and $11.7 million, respectively, to
satisfy certain tax withholding obligations due in connection with grants of stock awards under our
2003 Employee Stock Plan.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, our employees exercised vested options to
acquire .1 million and 2.3 million of our common shares resulting in proceeds of $.5 million and
$53.6 million, respectively.
Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Employment Contracts
Nabors Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Eugene M. Isenberg, and its Deputy Chairman,
President and Chief Operating Officer, Anthony G. Petrello, had in effect through the first quarter
of 2009 employment agreements which had been amended and restated effective October 1, 1996.
Effective April 1, 2009, the Company entered into amended and restated employment agreements (new
employment agreements) with Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello with terms extending through March 30,
2013.
Mr. Isenbergs employment agreement was originally negotiated with a creditors committee in
1987 in connection with the reorganization proceedings of Anglo Energy, Inc., which subsequently
changed its name to Nabors. These contractual arrangements were approved by the various
constituencies in those reorganization proceedings, including equity and debt holders, and
confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court.
Mr. Petrellos employment agreement was first entered into effective October 1, 1991. Mr.
Petrellos employment agreement was agreed upon as part of arms length negotiations with the Board
of Directors before he joined Nabors in October 1991, and was reviewed and approved by the
Compensation Committee of the Board and the full Board of Directors at that time.
The employment agreements for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello were restated in 1996 and
subsequently amended in 2002, 2005, 2006 (in the case of Mr. Isenberg) and 2008 (as amended, the
prior employment agreements). These amendments were approved by the Compensation Committee of the
Board and the full Board of Directors at the time of each amendment. The new employment agreements
were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which is comprised of all directors other
than Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello.
Effective April 1, 2009, the new employment agreements for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello amend
and restate the prior employment agreements. The new employment agreements provide for an
extension of the employment term through March 30, 2013, with automatic one-year extensions
beginning April 1, 2011, unless either party gives notice of non-renewal. The base salaries for
Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello were increased to $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Mr.
Isenberg has agreed to donate the after-tax proceeds of his base salary to an educational fund
intended to benefit Company employees or other worthy candidates.
20
Table of Contents
On June 29, 2009, the new employment agreements for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello were amended
to provide for a reduction of the annual rate of base salary payable to each of Messrs. Isenberg
and Petrello to $1.17 million per year and $990,000 per year, respectively, for the period from
June 29, 2009 to December 27, 2009.
In addition to a base salary, the new employment agreements provide for annual cash bonuses in
an amount equal to 2.25% and 1.5%, for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello, respectively, of Nabors net
cash flow (as defined in the respective employment agreements) in excess of 15% of the average
shareholders equity for each fiscal year. The new employment agreements also provide a quarterly
deferred bonus of $.6 million and $.25 million, respectively, to the accounts of Messrs. Isenberg
and Petrello under Nabors executive deferred compensation plan for each quarter they are employed
beginning June 30, 2009 and, in Mr. Petrellos case, ending March 30, 2019. In 18 of the last 19
years, Mr. Isenberg has agreed voluntarily to accept a lower annual cash bonus (i.e., an amount
lower than the amount provided for under his employment agreement) in light of his overall
compensation package. Mr. Petrello has agreed voluntarily to accept a lower annual cash bonus
(i.e., an amount lower than the amount provided for under his employment agreement) in light of his
overall compensation package in 15 of the last 18 years.
For 2008, the annual cash bonuses for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello pursuant to the formula
described in the prior employment agreements were $70.8 million and $23.1 million, respectively.
In October 2008, consistent with historical practice, Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello agreed to
accept a portion of their bonuses in restricted stock awards and were awarded 2,078,900 and 851,246
shares of restricted stock, respectively. These stock awards had a value at the date of grant of
$28.4 million and $11.6 million, respectively, for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello. Messrs. Isenberg
and Petrello also agreed to further reduce the cash bonus payable by accepting, in February 2009,
3.0 million and 1.7 million stock options, with a value of $8.8 million and $5.0 million,
respectively. They received the balance of their bonuses in cash ($33.6 million and $6.5 million,
respectively).
Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello also are eligible for awards under Nabors equity plans and may
participate in annual long-term incentive programs and pension and welfare plans, on the same basis
as other executives, and may receive special bonuses from time to time as determined by the Board
of Directors. The new employment agreements eliminate the risk of forfeiture of outstanding stock
awards. Accordingly, we recognized compensation expense during the second quarter with respect to
all previously granted unvested awards to Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello. As a result, as of June
30, 2009, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock and stock
option awards for either Messrs. Isenberg or Petrello.
Termination in the event of death, disability, or termination without cause. The new
employment agreements provide for severance payments in the event that either Mr. Isenbergs or Mr.
Petrellos employment agreement is terminated (i) upon death or disability (as defined in the
respective employment agreements), (ii) by Nabors prior to the expiration date of the employment
agreement for any reason other than for Cause (as defined in the respective employment agreements)
or (iii) by either individual for Constructive Termination Without Cause (as defined in the
respective employment agreements). Mr. Isenberg would be entitled to receive within 30 days of any
such triggering event a payment of $100 million. Mr. Petrello would be entitled to receive within
30 days of his death or disability a payment of $50 million or in the event of termination without
cause or constructive termination without cause, a payment based on a formula of three times the
average of his base salary and annual bonus (calculated as though the bonus formula under the new
employment agreement had been in effect) paid during the three fiscal years preceding the
termination. If, by way of example, there was a termination without cause event that applied
subsequent to June 30, 2009, then the payment to Mr. Petrello would be approximately $58 million.
The formula will be further reduced to two times the average stated above effective April 1, 2015.
The Company does not have insurance to cover its obligations in the event of death,
disability, or termination without cause for either Messrs. Isenberg or Petrello and the Company
has not recorded an expense or accrued a liability relating to these potential obligations.
In addition, under both the prior employment agreements and the new employment agreements, the
affected individual is entitled to receive (a) any unvested restricted stock outstanding, which
shall immediately and fully vest; (b) any unvested outstanding stock options, which shall
immediately and fully vest; (c) any amounts earned, accrued or owing to the executive but not yet
paid (including executive benefits, life insurance, disability benefits and reimbursement of
expenses and perquisites), which shall be continued through the later of the expiration date or
three years after the termination date; (d) continued participation in medical, dental and life
insurance coverage until the executive receives equivalent benefits or coverage through a
subsequent employer or until the death of the executive or his spouse, whichever is later; and (e)
any other or additional benefits in accordance with applicable plans and programs of Nabors. For
Mr. Isenberg, as of June 30, 2009, the value of unvested restricted stock was approximately $38
million and the value of in-the-money unvested stock options was approximately $9 million. For Mr.
Petrello, as of June 30, 2009, the value of unvested restricted stock was approximately $17
million. Mr. Petrello
21
Table of Contents
had no unvested stock options. Estimates of the cash value of Nabors obligations to Messrs.
Isenberg and Petrello under (c), (d) and (e) above are included in the payment amounts above.
Termination in the event of a Change in Control . The new employment agreements provide
that a termination of Messrs. Isenbergs or Petrellos employment related to a Change in Control
(as defined in their respective employment agreements) is considered a constructive termination
without cause. Accordingly, Mr. Isenberg would be entitled to receive within 30 days of the
triggering event a payment of $100 million and Mr. Petrello would be entitled to receive within 30
days of the triggering event a payment based on a formula of three times the average of his base
salary and annual bonus (calculated as though the new bonus formula had been in effect) paid during
the three fiscal years preceding the termination. If, by way of example, there was a change of
control event that applied subsequent to March 31, 2009, then the payment to Mr. Petrello would be
approximately $58 million. The formula is further reduced to two times the average stated above
effective April 1, 2015. The new employment agreements eliminate all tax gross-ups, including
without limitation tax gross-ups on golden parachute excise taxes, which applied under the prior
employment agreements.
Under both the prior employment agreements and the new employment agreements, the affected
individual would receive (a) any unvested restricted stock outstanding, which shall immediately and
fully vest; (b) any unvested outstanding stock options, which shall immediately and fully vest; (c)
any amounts earned, accrued or owing to the executive but not yet paid (including executive
benefits, life insurance, disability benefits and reimbursement of expenses and perquisites), which
shall be continued through the later of the expiration date or three years after the termination
date; (d) continued participation in medical, dental and life insurance coverage until the
executive receives equivalent benefits or coverage through a subsequent employer or until the death
of the executive or his spouse, whichever is later; and (e) any other or additional benefits in
accordance with applicable plans and programs of Nabors.
Other Obligations . In addition to salary and bonus, each of Messrs. Isenberg and
Petrello receive group life insurance at an amount at least equal to three times their respective
base salaries, various split-dollar life insurance policies, reimbursement of expenses, various
perquisites and a personal umbrella insurance policy in the amount of $5 million. Premiums payable
under the split-dollar life insurance policies were suspended as a result of the adoption of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Contingencies
Income Tax Contingencies
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions.
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the
ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate
tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities. Although we
believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related
litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in our income tax provisions
and accruals. Based on the results of an audit or litigation, a material effect on our financial
position, income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period or periods for which that
determination is made could result.
It is possible that future changes to tax laws (including tax treaties) could have an impact
on our ability to realize the tax savings recorded to date as well as future tax savings, resulting
from our 2002 corporate reorganization. See Note 11 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 for additional discussion.
On September 14, 2006, Nabors Drilling International Limited, one of our wholly owned Bermuda
subsidiaries (NDIL), received a Notice of Assessment (the Notice) from the Mexican Servicio de
Administracion Tributaria (the SAT) in connection with the audit of NDILs Mexican branch for tax
year 2003. The Notice proposes to deny depreciation expense deductions relating to drilling rigs
operating in Mexico in 2003. The notice also proposes to deny a deduction for payments made to an
affiliated company for the procurement of labor services in Mexico. The amount assessed by the SAT
was approximately $19.8 million (including interest and penalties). Nabors and its tax advisors
previously concluded that the deduction of said amounts was appropriate and more recently that the
position of the SAT lacks merit. NDILs Mexican branch took similar deductions for depreciation
and labor expenses for tax years 2004 to 2008. On June 30, 2009, the SAT proposed similar
assessments against the Mexican branch of another wholly owned Bermuda subsidiary, Nabors Drilling
International II Ltd. (NDIL II) for the tax year 2006. We anticipate that a similar assessment
will eventually be proposed against NDIL for the tax years 2004 through 2008 and against NDIL II
for the tax years 2007 to 2009. We believe that the potential
assessments would range from $6 million to $26 million per year for
the period from 2004 to 2009, and in aggregate, would be
approximately $90 to $95 million. Although we believe that any
assessments related to the 2004 to 2009 years would also lack merit,
a reserve has been recorded in accordance
with the requirements of FIN 48.
If these additional assessments were to be made and the Company
ultimately did not prevail, we would be required to recognize
additional tax for the amount of the aggregate over the current
reserve.
22
Table of Contents
Self-Insurance Accruals
We are self-insured for certain losses relating to workers compensation, employers
liability, general liability, automobile liability and property damage. Effective April 1, 2009,
with our insurance renewal, certain changes have been made to our self-insured retentions. Certain
workers compensation claims are subject to a minimum $1.0 million deductible and employers
liability and marine employers liability are subject to a $2.0 million per occurrence deductible.
Certain automobile liability is subject to a $.5 million per occurrence deductible plus an
additional $1.0 million corridor deductible. General liability claims are subject to a $5.0
million per occurrence deductible.
In addition, we are subject to a $5.0 million deductible for all land rigs and a $10.0 million
deductible for offshore rigs. This applies to all kinds of risks of physical damage except for
named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Effective April 1, 2009, our risks of physical damage
from named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico are self-insured.
Litigation
Nabors and its subsidiaries are defendants or otherwise involved in a number of lawsuits in
the ordinary course of business. We estimate the range of our liability related to pending
litigation when we believe the amount and range of loss can be estimated. We record our best
estimate of a loss when the loss is considered probable. When a liability is probable and there is
a range of estimated loss with no best estimate in the range, we record the minimum estimated
liability related to the lawsuits or claims. As additional information becomes available, we assess
the potential liability related to our pending litigation and claims and revise our estimates. Due
to uncertainties related to the resolution of lawsuits and claims, the ultimate outcome may differ
from our estimates. In the opinion of management and based on liability accruals provided, our
ultimate exposure with respect to these pending lawsuits and claims is not expected to have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or cash flows, although they could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for a particular reporting period.
On July 5, 2007, we received an inquiry from the U.S. Department of Justice relating to its
investigation of one of our vendors and compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The
inquiry relates to transactions with and involving Panalpina, a vendor which provides freight
forwarding and customs clearance services to certain of our affiliates. To date, the inquiry has
focused on transactions in Kazakhstan, Saudi Arabia, Algeria and Nigeria. The Audit Committee of
our Board of Directors has engaged outside counsel to review certain transactions with this vendor
and their review is ongoing. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has received periodic
updates at its regularly scheduled meetings and the Chairman of the Audit Committee has received
updates between meetings as circumstances warrant. The investigation includes a review of certain
amounts paid to and by Panalpina in connection with the obtaining of permits for the temporary
importation of equipment and clearance of goods and materials through customs. Both the SEC and
the U.S. Department of Justice have been advised of the Companys investigation. The ultimate
outcome of this review or the effect of implementing any further measures which may be necessary to
ensure full compliance with the applicable laws cannot be determined at this time.
A court in Algeria has entered a judgment of approximately $19.7 million against the Company
related to certain alleged customs infractions. The Company believes it did not receive proper
notice of the judicial proceedings against it, and that the amount of the judgment is excessive.
We have asserted the lack of legally required notice as a basis for challenging the judgment on
appeal. Based upon our understanding of applicable law and precedent, we believe that this
challenge will be successful. We do not believe that a loss is probable and have not accrued any
amounts related to this matter. However, the ultimate resolution of this matter, and the timing of
such resolution, is uncertain. If the Company is ultimately required to pay a fine or judgment
related to this matter, the amount of the loss could range from approximately $140,000 to $19.7
million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements (Including Guarantees)
We are a party to certain transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements defined
as off-balance sheet arrangements that could have a material future effect on our financial
position, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. The most significant of these
off-balance sheet arrangements involve agreements and obligations in which we provide financial or
performance assurance to third parties. Certain of these agreements serve as guarantees, including
standby letters of credit issued on behalf of insurance carriers in conjunction with our workers
compensation insurance program and other financial surety instruments such as bonds. We have also
guaranteed payment of contingent consideration in conjunction with an acquisition in 2005.
Potential contingent consideration is based on future operating results of the acquired business.
In addition, we have provided indemnifications to certain third parties which serve as guarantees.
These guarantees include indemnification provided by Nabors to our share transfer agent and our
insurance carriers. We are not able to estimate the potential future maximum payments that might be
due under our indemnification guarantees.
23
Table of Contents
Management believes the likelihood that we would be required to perform or otherwise incur any
material losses associated with any of these guarantees is remote. The following table summarizes
the total maximum amount of financial and performance guarantees issued by Nabors:
Maximum Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||
Remainder | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | of 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||
Financial standby letters of
credit and other financial surety
instruments |
$ | 36,655 | $ | 120,049 | $ | 967 | $ | 279 | $ | 157,950 | ||||||||||
Contingent consideration in acquisition |
| 2,125 | 2,125 | | 4,250 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 36,655 | $ | 122,174 | $ | 3,092 | $ | 279 | $ | 162,200 | ||||||||||
Note 11 Earnings (Losses) Per Share
Prior to January 1, 2009, the Company excluded unvested restricted stock awards in the
calculation of basic earnings per share under the provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings per share
and applied the treasury stock method of accounting in calculating the effect on fully diluted
shares of unvested restricted stock. In June 2008 the FASB issued FSP EITF (EITF) 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities. This EITF provides that securities which are granted in share-based transactions are
participating securities prior to vesting if they have a nonforfeitable right to participate in
any dividends, and such securities therefore should be included in computing basic and diluted
earnings per share. Our awards of restricted stock are considered participating securities under
this definition. This EITF was applicable to our financial statements effective January 1, 2009
and required that all prior period earnings per share data be adjusted retrospectively to conform
with the provisions of the EITF.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of FSP EITF 03-6-1 and are now required
to include unvested restricted stock awards in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per
share using the two-class method. The adoption of this EITF resulted in reductions of $.01 and
$.02 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, to our basic earnings per
share calculation and a reduction to our diluted earnings per share calculation of $.01 for each of
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings (losses)
per share computations is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) (numerator): |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) basic |
$ | (192,986 | ) | $ | 176,413 | $ | (67,816 | ) | $ | 388,457 | ||||||
Add interest expense on assumed conversion of our zero coupon
convertible/exchangeable senior debentures/notes, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
$2.75 billion due 2011 (1) |
| | | | ||||||||||||
$82.8 million due 2021 (2) |
| | | | ||||||||||||
$700 million due 2023 (3) |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Adjusted net
income (loss) diluted |
$ | (192,986 | ) | $ | 176,413 | $ | (67,816 | ) | $ | 388,457 | ||||||
Earnings (losses) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (.68 | ) | $ | .63 | $ | (.24 | ) | $ | 1.38 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | (.68 | ) | $ | .60 | $ | (.24 | ) | $ | 1.34 | ||||||
Shares (denominator): |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding basic (4) |
283,154 | 280,851 | 283,126 | 280,508 | ||||||||||||
Net effect of dilutive stock options, warrants and restricted stock
awards based on the if converted method |
| 8,507 | | 7,060 | ||||||||||||
Assumed conversion of our zero coupon convertible/exchangeable
senior debentures/notes: |
||||||||||||||||
$2.75 billion due 2011 (1) |
| | | | ||||||||||||
$82.8 million due 2021 (2) |
| | | | ||||||||||||
$700 million due 2023 (3) |
| 5,129 | | 2,565 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding diluted |
283,154 | 294,487 | 283,126 | 290,133 | ||||||||||||
24
Table of Contents
(1) | Diluted earnings (losses) per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 do not include any incremental shares issuable upon exchange of the $2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes due 2011. During 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2009 we purchased $888.5 million par value of these notes in the open market, leaving approximately $1.86 billion par value outstanding. The number of shares that we would be required to issue upon exchange consists of only the incremental shares that would be issued above the principal amount of the notes, as we are required to pay cash up to the principal amount of the notes exchanged. We would issue an incremental number of shares only upon exchange of these notes. Such shares are included in the calculation of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding in our diluted earnings per share calculation only when our stock price exceeds $45.83 as of the last trading day of the quarter and the average price of our shares for the ten consecutive trading days beginning on the third business day after the last trading day of the quarter exceeds $45.83, which did not occur during any period for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. | |
(2) | In June 2008 Nabors Delaware called for redemption of the full $82.8 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of its zero coupon senior convertible debentures due 2021 and in July 2008, paid cash of $60.6 million, an amount equal to the issue price of $50.4 million plus accrued original issue discount of $10.2 million. No common shares were issued as part of the redemption of the $82.8 million zero coupon convertible senior debentures. | |
(3) | In May 2008 Nabors Delaware called for redemption all of its $700 million zero coupon senior exchangeable notes due 2023 and in June and July 2008 issued an aggregate 5.25 million common shares which equated to the excess of the exchange value of the notes over their principal amount, as cash was required up to the principal amount of the notes exchanged. Diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 reflect the conversion of the $700 million zero coupon senior exchangeable notes due 2023 resulting in the inclusion of the incremental number of shares that were required to be issued upon the exchange of these notes. The number of shares issued upon exchange equated to the excess of the exchange value of the notes over their principal amount, as Nabors Delaware was required to pay cash up to the principal amount of the notes exchanged. Because the conversion was partially completed in June 2008, only the .5 million of our treasury shares that were actually issued in June 2008 were included in the calculation of the weighted-average number of basic shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, resulting in an incremental increase of .121 million weighted-average number of basic shares outstanding. Because the remaining balance of the shares was issued in July 2008, the effect of the 5.25 million shares issued in connection with the conversion of the $700 million zero coupon senior exchangeable notes due 2023 was not reflected in the calculation of the weighted-avearge number of basic shares outstanding until the three months ended September 30, 2008. The calculation of the weighted-average number of diluted shares outstanding include the effect of the entire 5.25 million shares for the three months ended June 30, 2008. | |
(4) | Includes the following weighted-average number of common shares and restricted stock of Nabors and weighted-average number of exchangeable shares of Nabors (Canada) Exchangeco Inc. (Nabors Exchangeco), respectively: 283.1 million and .1 million shares for the three months ended June 30, 2009; 280.8 million and .1 million shares for the three months ended June 30, 2008; 283.0 million and .1 million shares for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 280.4 million and .1 million shares for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The exchangeable shares of Nabors Exchangeco are exchangeable for Nabors common shares on a one-for-one basis, and have essentially identical rights as Nabors common shares, including but not limited to, voting rights and the right to receive dividends, if any. |
For all periods presented, the computation of diluted earnings (losses) per share excludes
outstanding stock options and warrants with exercise prices greater than the average market price
of Nabors common shares, because the inclusion of such options and warrants would be anti-dilutive
and such options and warrants are not considered participating securities. The average number of
options and warrants that were excluded from diluted earnings (losses) per share that would
potentially dilute earnings per share in the future was 35,783,476 shares during the three months
ended June 30, 2009, and 33,403,319 and 2,716,877 shares during the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. No options or warrants were excluded from diluted earnings (losses) per
share for the three months ended June 30, 2008. In any period during which the average market
price of Nabors common shares exceeds the exercise prices of these stock options and warrants,
such stock options and warrants will be included in our diluted earnings (losses) per share
computation using the if converted method of accounting. Restricted stock will be included in our
basic and diluted earnings (losses) per share computation using the two-class method of accounting
in all periods because such stock is considered participating securities.
25
Table of Contents
Note 12 Supplemental Balance Sheet and Income Statement Information
At
June 30, 2009, other long-term assets included a deposit of $40
million of restricted funds which is held by a financial
institution to assure future credit availability for an unconsolidated affiliate.
Accrued liabilities include the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
$ | 102,435 | $ | 164,252 | ||||
Deferred revenue |
85,299 | 72,377 | ||||||
Other taxes payable |
22,617 | 24,191 | ||||||
Workers compensation liabilities |
23,618 | 23,618 | ||||||
Interest payable |
84,009 | 37,334 | ||||||
Warranty accrual |
8,391 | 8,639 | ||||||
Litigation reserves |
6,771 | 4,825 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
33,865 | 32,157 | ||||||
$ | 367,005 | $ | 367,393 | |||||
Investment income includes the following:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Interest and dividend income |
$ | 13,795 | $ | 23,036 | ||||
Gains (losses) on short-term investments, net (1) |
13,594 | 28,203 | ||||||
$ | 27,389 | $ | 51,239 | |||||
(1) | For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, amount includes realized gains of $13.0 million and $44.6 million, respectively, on our equity securities classified as trading. |
Losses (gains) on sales and retirements of long-lived assets and other expense (income),
net includes the following:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Losses on sales and retirements of long-lived assets |
$ | 4,419 | $ | 10,535 | ||||
Litigation reserves |
2,943 | 1,715 | ||||||
Foreign currency transaction losses (gains) |
690 | (725 | ) | |||||
Gains on derivative instruments |
(1,606 | ) | (157 | ) | ||||
Gain on debt extinguishment |
(15,969 | ) | | |||||
Other gains |
(1,305 | ) | (113 | ) | ||||
$ | (10,828 | ) | $ | 11,255 | ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $(39.8)
million and $46.4 million, respectively, while comprehensive income for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008 totaled $213.1 million and $465.5 million, respectively.
Note 13 Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate
Our U.S. oil and gas joint venture (49.7% ownership) accounted for using the equity method is
included in investment in unconsolidated affiliates. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 our
earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates included non-cash pre-tax writedowns of $(8.3)
million and $(75.0) million. The non-cash pre-tax writedown of $(75.0) million represented our
proportionate share of a non-cash pre-tax ceiling test writedown from our domestic oil and gas
joint venture recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2009. This writedown resulted from
the ceiling test application of the full cost method of accounting for costs related to oil and
natural gas properties. There was no ceiling test writedown recorded in the three months ended
June 30, 2009. In calculating our ceiling test charges, we are required to hold commodity prices
constant over the life of the reserves, even though actual prices of natural gas and oil are
volatile and change from period to period. We may be required to record additional ceiling test
charges in the future if commodity prices continue to decrease. Presented below is summarized
income statement information for our U.S. joint venture:
Six Months | ||||
Ended June 30, | ||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | |||
Gross revenues |
$ | 63,931 | ||
Gross margin |
(143,075 | ) | ||
Net loss |
(162,007 | ) |
26
Table of Contents
Note 14 Segment Information
The following table sets forth financial information with respect to our reportable segments:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Operating revenues and Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates: |
||||||||||||||||
Contract Drilling: (1) |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling |
$ | 249,859 | $ | 438,848 | $ | 639,738 | $ | 845,909 | ||||||||
U.S. Land Well-servicing |
100,080 | 182,222 | 234,442 | 353,363 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Offshore |
41,947 | 65,723 | 102,339 | 117,178 | ||||||||||||
Alaska |
53,207 | 45,114 | 115,989 | 99,483 | ||||||||||||
Canada |
45,035 | 67,782 | 157,180 | 246,634 | ||||||||||||
International |
327,551 | 342,892 | 670,207 | 646,464 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal Contract Drilling (2) |
817,679 | 1,142,581 | 1,919,895 | 2,309,031 | ||||||||||||
Oil and Gas (3)(4) |
(6,001 | ) | 11,352 | (66,045 | ) | 25,392 | ||||||||||
Other Operating Segments (5)(6) |
105,547 | 172,865 | 262,464 | 338,647 | ||||||||||||
Other reconciling items (7) |
(57,483 | ) | (48,431 | ) | (122,954 | ) | (99,296 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 859,742 | $ | 1,278,367 | $ | 1,993,360 | $ | 2,573,774 | ||||||||
Adjusted income derived from operating activities: (8) |
||||||||||||||||
Contract Drilling: (1) |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling |
$ | 70,075 | $ | 134,322 | $ | 199,317 | $ | 261,193 | ||||||||
U.S. Land Well-servicing |
6,192 | 31,468 | 19,850 | 61,854 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Offshore |
6,724 | 17,983 | 23,554 | 24,441 | ||||||||||||
Alaska |
16,374 | 13,466 | 37,199 | 31,249 | ||||||||||||
Canada |
(10,151 | ) | (14,326 | ) | 3,024 | 27,647 | ||||||||||
International |
101,303 | 101,752 | 204,278 | 192,402 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal Contract Drilling (2) |
190,517 | 284,665 | 487,222 | 598,786 | ||||||||||||
Oil and Gas (3) (4) |
(15,228 | ) | (1,645 | ) | (86,562 | ) | (6,497 | ) | ||||||||
Other Operating Segments (5) (6) |
4,925 | 19,006 | 24,029 | 31,440 | ||||||||||||
Total segment adjusted income derived from operating activities |
180,214 | 302,026 | 424,689 | 623,729 | ||||||||||||
Other reconciling items (9) |
(106,766 | ) | (36,907 | ) | (152,158 | ) | (72,179 | ) | ||||||||
Adjusted income derived from operating activities |
73,448 | 265,119 | 272,531 | 551,550 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(66,027 | ) | (49,375 | ) | (133,105 | ) | (96,067 | ) | ||||||||
Investment income |
18,248 | 25,057 | 27,389 | 51,239 | ||||||||||||
(Losses) gains on sales and retirements of long-lived assets and
other (expense) income, net |
(6,469 | ) | (3,158 | ) | 10,828 | (11,255 | ) | |||||||||
Impairments and other charges (10) |
(227,083 | ) | | (227,083 | ) | | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (207,883 | ) | $ | 237,643 | $ | (49,440 | ) | $ | 495,467 | ||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Total assets: |
||||||||
Contract Drilling: (11) |
||||||||
U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling |
$ | 2,618,590 | $ | 2,833,618 | ||||
U.S. Land Well-servicing |
629,385 | 707,009 | ||||||
U.S. Offshore |
456,204 | 480,324 | ||||||
Alaska |
399,777 | 356,603 | ||||||
Canada |
1,132,847 | 906,154 | ||||||
International |
3,225,565 | 3,080,947 | ||||||
Subtotal Contract Drilling |
8,462,368 | 8,364,655 | ||||||
Oil and Gas (12) |
976,356 | 929,848 | ||||||
Other Operating Segments (13) |
508,451 | 578,802 | ||||||
Other reconciling items (9) (14) |
922,187 | 644,594 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 10,869,362 | $ | 10,517,899 | ||||
27
Table of Contents
(1) | These segments include our drilling, workover and well-servicing operations, on land and offshore. | |
(2) | Includes earnings (losses), net from unconsolidated affiliates, accounted for using the equity method, of $.6 million and $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $1.9 million and $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. | |
(3) | Includes our proportionate share of non-cash pre-tax writedowns recorded by our domestic oil and gas joint venture of $(8.3) million and $(83.3) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. | |
(4) | Includes earnings (losses), net from unconsolidated affiliates, accounted for using the equity method, of $(11.0) million and $(6.7) million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $(83.3) million and $(24.6) million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. | |
(5) | Includes our drilling technology and top drive manufacturing, directional drilling, rig instrumentation and software, and construction and logistics operations. | |
(6) | Includes earnings (losses), net from unconsolidated affiliates, accounted for using the equity method, of $2.3 million and $(.1) million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $8.8 million and $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. | |
(7) | Represents the elimination of inter-segment transactions. | |
(8) | Adjusted income derived from operating activities is computed by subtracting direct costs, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, and depletion expense from Operating revenues and then adding Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates. Such amounts should not be used as a substitute for those amounts reported under GAAP. However, management evaluates the performance of our business units and the consolidated company based on several criteria, including adjusted income derived from operating activities, because it believes that this financial measure is an accurate reflection of the ongoing profitability of our Company. A reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to income (loss) before income taxes, which is a GAAP measure, is provided within the above table. | |
(9) | Represents the elimination of inter-segment transactions and unallocated corporate expenses, assets and capital expenditures. | |
(10) | Represents non-cash pre-tax impairments and other charges recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2009. | |
(11) | Includes $51.9 million and $49.2 million of investments in unconsolidated affiliates accounted for using the equity method as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. | |
(12) | Includes $317.6 million and $298.3 million investments in unconsolidated affiliates accounted for using the equity method as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. | |
(13) | Includes $63.6 million and $63.3 million of investments in unconsolidated affiliates accounted for using the equity method as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. | |
(14) | Includes $.9 million and $.9 million of investments in unconsolidated affiliates accounted for using the cost method as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. |
28
Table of Contents
Note 15 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information
Nabors has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of the issued public debt securities of
Nabors Delaware, and Nabors and Nabors Delaware have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the $225
million 4.875% senior notes due August 2009 issued by Nabors Holdings 1, ULC, an unlimited
liability company formed under the Companies Act of Nova Scotia, Canada and a subsidiary of Nabors
(Nabors Holdings).
The following condensed consolidating financial information is included so that separate
financial statements of Nabors Delaware and Nabors Holdings are not required to be filed with the
SEC. The condensed consolidating financial statements present investments in both consolidated and
unconsolidated affiliates using the equity method of accounting.
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents condensed consolidating
balance sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, statements of income for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidating statements of cash flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 of (a) Nabors, parent/guarantor, (b) Nabors Delaware, issuer of
public debt securities guaranteed by Nabors and guarantor of the $225 million 4.875% senior notes
issued by Nabors Holdings, (c) Nabors Holdings, issuer of the $225 million 4.875% senior notes, (d)
the non-guarantor subsidiaries, (e) consolidating adjustments necessary to consolidate Nabors and
its subsidiaries and (f) Nabors on a consolidated basis.
29
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Delaware | Nabors | Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Parent/ | (Issuer/ | Holdings | (Non- | Consolidating | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Guarantor) | Guarantor) | (Issuer) | Guarantors) | Adjustments | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 343 | $ | 5,297 | $ | 341 | $ | 1,017,672 | $ | | $ | 1,023,653 | ||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
| | | 172,787 | | 172,787 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| | | 787,653 | | 787,653 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inventory |
| | | 134,017 | | 134,017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| (3,992 | ) | | 26,829 | | 22,837 | |||||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
428 | (650 | ) | 376 | 161,060 | | 161,214 | |||||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
771 | 655 | 717 | 2,300,018 | | 2,302,161 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term investments and other
receivables |
| | | 140,101 | | 140,101 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| 49,917 | | 7,571,269 | | 7,621,186 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| | | 162,812 | | 162,812 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
264,754 | 1,657,441 | 83,733 | 36,715 | (2,042,643 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated
affiliates |
4,786,296 | 4,249,010 | 291,478 | 2,332,012 | (11,224,841 | ) | 433,955 | |||||||||||||||||
Other long-term assets |
| 22,776 | 55 | 186,316 | | 209,147 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 5,051,821 | $ | 5,979,799 | $ | 375,983 | $ | 12,729,243 | $ | (13,267,484 | ) | $ | 10,869,362 | |||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | | $ | | $ | 168,399 | $ | 300 | $ | | $ | 168,699 | ||||||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
| 31 | | 262,514 | | 262,545 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
3,997 | 79,529 | 3,086 | 280,393 | | 367,005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
| 75,017 | 4,166 | (32,933 | ) | | 46,250 | |||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
3,997 | 154,577 | 175,651 | 510,274 | | 844,499 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
| 4,062,456 | | 832 | | 4,063,288 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 1,673 | | 265,505 | | 267,178 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 159,301 | 11,282 | 475,990 | | 646,573 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany payable |
| | | 2,042,643 | (2,042,643 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
3,997 | 4,378,007 | 186,933 | 3,295,244 | (2,042,643 | ) | 5,821,538 | |||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
5,047,824 | 1,601,792 | 189,050 | 9,433,999 | (11,224,841 | ) | 5,047,824 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
$ | 5,051,821 | $ | 5,979,799 | $ | 375,983 | $ | 12,729,243 | $ | (13,267,484 | ) | $ | 10,869,362 | |||||||||||
30
Table of Contents
December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Delaware | Nabors | Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Parent/ | (Issuer/ | Holdings | (Non- | Consolidating | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Guarantor) | Guarantor) | (Issuer) | Guarantors) | Adjustments | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 8,291 | $ | 96 | $ | 1,259 | $ | 432,441 | $ | | $ | 442,087 | ||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
| | | 142,158 | | 142,158 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| | | 1,160,768 | | 1,160,768 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inventory |
| | | 150,118 | | 150,118 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| (3,992 | ) | | 32,075 | | 28,083 | |||||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
136 | 60,090 | 376 | 182,777 | | 243,379 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
8,427 | 56,194 | 1,635 | 2,100,337 | | 2,166,593 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term investments and other
receivables |
| | | 239,952 | | 239,952 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| 49,917 | | 7,282,042 | | 7,331,959 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| | | 175,749 | | 175,749 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
185,626 | 1,177,864 | 135,284 | 36,715 | (1,535,489 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated
affiliates |
4,718,604 | 4,388,439 | 378,237 | 2,527,973 | (11,601,526 | ) | 411,727 | |||||||||||||||||
Other long-term assets |
| 20,874 | 401 | 170,644 | | 191,919 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,912,657 | $ | 5,693,288 | $ | 515,557 | $ | 12,533,412 | $ | (13,137,015 | ) | $ | 10,517,899 | |||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | | $ | | $ | 224,829 | $ | 201 | $ | | $ | 225,030 | ||||||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
755 | 79 | | 424,074 | | 424,908 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
7,796 | 31,773 | 4,151 | 323,673 | | 367,393 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
| 135,992 | 36 | (24,500 | ) | | 111,528 | |||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
8,551 | 167,844 | 229,016 | 723,448 | | 1,128,859 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
| 3,599,404 | | 1,129 | | 3,600,533 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| | | 261,878 | | 261,878 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 117,125 | (333 | ) | 505,731 | | 622,523 | |||||||||||||||||
Intercompany payable |
| | | 1,535,489 | (1,535,489 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
8,551 | 3,884,373 | 228,683 | 3,027,675 | (1,535,489 | ) | 5,613,793 | |||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
4,904,106 | 1,808,915 | 286,874 | 9,505,737 | (11,601,526 | ) | 4,904,106 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
$ | 4,912,657 | $ | 5,693,288 | $ | 515,557 | $ | 12,533,412 | $ | (13,137,015 | ) | $ | 10,517,899 | |||||||||||
31
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Delaware | Nabors | Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Parent/ | (Issuer/ | Holdings | (Non- | Consolidating | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Guarantor) | Guarantor) | (Issuer) | Guarantors) | Adjustments | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues and other income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 867,869 | $ | | $ | 867,869 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (losses) from
unconsolidated affiliates |
| | | (8,127 | ) | | (8,127 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings (losses) from consolidated
affiliates |
(175,301 | ) | (227,595 | ) | (90,745 | ) | (260,209 | ) | 753,850 | | ||||||||||||||
Investment income |
13 | 528 | | 17,707 | | 18,248 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest income |
| 14,979 | 2,194 | | (17,173 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other income |
(175,288 | ) | (212,088 | ) | (88,551 | ) | 617,240 | 736,677 | 877,990 | |||||||||||||||
Costs and other deductions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct costs |
| | | 453,922 | | 453,922 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
17,698 | 60 | | 146,295 | (245 | ) | 163,808 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| | | 165,974 | | 165,974 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depletion |
| | | 2,590 | | 2,590 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| 72,287 | 2,141 | (8,401 | ) | | 66,027 | |||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest expense |
| | | 17,173 | (17,173 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Losses (gains) on sales and
retirements of long-lived assets
and other expense (income), net |
| 843 | (11,111 | ) | 16,492 | 245 | 6,469 | |||||||||||||||||
Impairments and other charges |
| | | 227,083 | | 227,083 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and other deductions |
17,698 | 73,190 | (8,970 | ) | 1,021,128 | (17,173 | ) | 1,085,873 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(192,986 | ) | (285,278 | ) | (79,581 | ) | (403,888 | ) | 753,850 | (207,883 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
| (21,343 | ) | 17,453 | (11,007 | ) | | (14,897 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (192,986 | ) | $ | (263,935 | ) | $ | (97,034 | ) | $ | (392,881 | ) | $ | 753,850 | $ | (192,986 | ) | |||||||
32
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Delaware | Nabors | Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Parent/ | (Issuer/ | Holdings | (Non- | Consolidating | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Guarantor) | Guarantor) | (Issuer) | Guarantors) | Adjustments | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues and other income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,282,400 | $ | | $ | 1,282,400 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (losses) from
unconsolidated affiliates |
| | | (4,033 | ) | | (4,033 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings (losses) from consolidated
affiliates |
180,332 | 105,611 | 3,637 | 93,118 | (382,698 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Investment income |
52 | | | 25,005 | | 25,057 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest income |
1,000 | 17,039 | | | (18,039 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other income |
181,384 | 122,650 | 3,637 | 1,396,490 | (400,737 | ) | 1,303,424 | |||||||||||||||||
Costs and other deductions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct costs |
| | | 740,178 | | 740,178 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
4,971 | 234 | | 111,995 | (286 | ) | 116,914 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 940 | | 147,873 | | 148,813 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depletion |
| | | 7,343 | | 7,343 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| 49,320 | 2,860 | (2,805 | ) | | 49,375 | |||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest expense |
| | 2,234 | 15,805 | (18,039 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Losses (gains) on sales,
retirements and impairments of
long-lived assets and other expense
(income), net |
| (1,544 | ) | (7,146 | ) | 11,562 | 286 | 3,158 | ||||||||||||||||
Total costs and other deductions |
4,971 | 48,950 | (2,052 | ) | 1,031,951 | (18,039 | ) | 1,065,781 | ||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
176,413 | 73,700 | 5,689 | 364,539 | (382,698 | ) | 237,643 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
| (11,807 | ) | 1,820 | 71,217 | | 61,230 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 176,413 | $ | 85,507 | $ | 3,869 | $ | 293,322 | $ | (382,698 | ) | $ | 176,413 | |||||||||||
33
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Delaware | Nabors | Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Parent/ | (Issuer/ | Holdings | (Non- | Consolidating | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Guarantor) | Guarantor) | (Issuer) | Guarantors) | Adjustments | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues and other income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,065,914 | $ | | $ | 2,065,914 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (losses) from
unconsolidated affiliates |
| | | (72,554 | ) | | (72,554 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings (losses) from consolidated
affiliates |
(53,028 | ) | (186,688 | ) | (86,759 | ) | (243,740 | ) | 570,215 | | ||||||||||||||
Investment income |
50 | 2,343 | 1 | 24,995 | | 27,389 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest income |
| 29,250 | 4,442 | | (33,692 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other income |
(52,978 | ) | (155,095 | ) | (82,316 | ) | 1,774,615 | 536,523 | 2,020,749 | |||||||||||||||
Costs and other deductions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct costs |
| | | 1,119,209 | | 1,119,209 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
23,450 | 208 | 1 | 247,863 | (371 | ) | 271,151 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 150 | | 324,976 | | 325,126 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depletion |
| | | 5,343 | | 5,343 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| 145,768 | 4,563 | (17,226 | ) | | 133,105 | |||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest expense |
| | | 33,692 | (33,692 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Losses (gains) on sales and
retirements of long-lived assets
and other expense (income), net |
(8,612 | ) | (9,219 | ) | (6,137 | ) | 12,769 | 371 | (10,828 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Impairments and other charges |
| | | 227,083 | | 227,083 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and other deductions |
14,838 | 136,907 | (1,573 | ) | 1,953,709 | (33,692 | ) | 2,070,189 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(67,816 | ) | (292,002 | ) | (80,743 | ) | (179,094 | ) | 570,215 | (49,440 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
| (38,966 | ) | 17,081 | 40,261 | | 18,376 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (67,816 | ) | $ | (253,036 | ) | $ | (97,824 | ) | $ | (219,355 | ) | $ | 570,215 | $ | (67,816 | ) | |||||||
34
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Delaware | Nabors | Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Parent/ | (Issuer/ | Holdings | (Non- | Consolidating | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Guarantor) | Guarantor) | (Issuer) | Guarantors) | Adjustments | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues and other income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,582,258 | $ | | $ | 2,582,258 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (losses) from
unconsolidated affiliates |
| | | (8,484 | ) | | (8,484 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings (losses) from consolidated
affiliates |
395,644 | 244,816 | 11,981 | 218,333 | (870,774 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Investment income |
194 | 127 | | 50,918 | | 51,239 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest income |
2,000 | 36,842 | | | (38,842 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other income |
397,838 | 281,785 | 11,981 | 2,843,025 | (909,616 | ) | 2,625,013 | |||||||||||||||||
Costs and other deductions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct costs |
| | | 1,487,948 | | 1,487,948 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
9,381 | 274 | 29 | 219,008 | (457 | ) | 228,235 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 1,812 | | 283,201 | | 285,013 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depletion |
| | | 21,028 | | 21,028 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| 95,165 | 5,720 | (4,818 | ) | | 96,067 | |||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest expense |
| | | 38,842 | (38,842 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Losses (gains) on sales,
retirements and impairments of
long-lived assets and other expense
(income), net |
| (132 | ) | (4,214 | ) | 15,144 | 457 | 11,255 | ||||||||||||||||
Total costs and other deductions |
9,381 | 97,119 | 1,535 | 2,060,353 | (38,842 | ) | 2,129,546 | |||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
388,457 | 184,666 | 10,446 | 782,672 | (870,774 | ) | 495,467 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
| (22,256 | ) | 3,342 | 125,924 | | 107,010 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 388,457 | $ | 206,922 | $ | 7,104 | $ | 656,748 | $ | (870,774 | ) | $ | 388,457 | |||||||||||
35
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Delaware | Nabors | Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Parent/ | (Issuer/ | Holdings | (Non- | Consolidating | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Guarantor) | Guarantor) | (Issuer) | Guarantors) | Adjustments | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for)
operating activities |
$ | 899 | $ | (364,872 | ) | $ | (727 | ) | $ | 1,372,015 | $ | | $ | 1,007,315 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of investments |
| | | (22,614 | ) | | (22,614 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and maturities of investments |
| | | 39,592 | | 39,592 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated
affiliates |
| | | (100,670 | ) | | (100,670 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
| | | (710,849 | ) | | (710,849 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of assets and
insurance claims |
| | | 12,791 | | 12,791 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash paid for investments in
consolidated affiliates |
(7,900 | ) | | | | 7,900 | | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for)
investing activities |
(7,900 | ) | | | (781,750 | ) | 7,900 | (781,750 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash
overdrafts |
| | | (15,715 | ) | | (15,715 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
| 1,124,978 | | | | 1,124,978 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs |
| (8,699 | ) | | | | (8,699 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Intercompany debt |
| (56,575 | ) | 56,575 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common
shares |
549 | | | | | 549 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reduction in long-term debt |
| (688,195 | ) | (56,766 | ) | (251 | ) | | (745,212 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Gain on repurchase of convertible
debt equity component |
(1,541 | ) | (1,541 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of restricted stock |
(1,496 | ) | | | | | (1,496 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit related to the
exercise of stock options |
| 105 | | | | 105 | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from parent contributions |
| | | 7,900 | (7,900 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used for) provided by
financing activities |
(947 | ) | 370,073 | (191 | ) | (8,066 | ) | (7,900 | ) | 352,969 | ||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents |
| | | 3,032 | | 3,032 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents |
(7,948 | ) | 5,201 | (918 | ) | 585,231 | | 581,566 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning
of period |
8,291 | 96 | 1,259 | 432,441 | | 442,087 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period |
$ | 343 | $ | 5,297 | $ | 341 | $ | 1,017,672 | $ | | $ | 1,023,653 | ||||||||||||
36
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nabors | Delaware | Nabors | Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Parent/ | (Issuer/ | Holdings | (Non- | Consolidating | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Guarantor) | Guarantor) | (Issuer) | Guarantors) | Adjustments | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for)
operating activities |
$ | (25,929 | ) | $ | (159,601 | ) | $ | (163,530 | ) | $ | 1,139,181 | $ | (158,126 | ) | $ | 631,995 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of investments |
| | | (190,509 | ) | | (190,509 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and maturities of investments |
| | | 399,669 | | 399,669 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated
affiliates |
| | | (47,452 | ) | | (47,452 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
| (8,465 | ) | | (743,360 | ) | | (751,825 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of assets and
insurance claims |
| | | 16,998 | | 16,998 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash paid for investments in
consolidated affiliates |
(7,800 | ) | (150,626 | ) | | (163,548 | ) | 321,974 | | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for)
investing activities |
(7,800 | ) | (159,091 | ) | | (728,202 | ) | 321,974 | (573,119 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease in cash overdrafts |
| | | 15,771 | | 15,771 | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
| 575,219 | | | | 575,219 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs |
| (4,460 | ) | | | | (4,460 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common
shares |
53,587 | | | | | 53,587 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reduction in long-term debt |
| (171,788 | ) | | | | (171,788 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares |
| (87,800 | ) | | (62,314 | ) | | (150,114 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Purchase of restricted stock |
(11,667 | ) | | | | | (11,667 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit related to the
exercise of stock options |
| 4,771 | | | | 4,771 | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from parent contributions |
| | 163,548 | 158,426 | (321,974 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
| | | (158,126 | ) | 158,126 | | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used for) provided by
financing activities |
41,920 | 315,942 | 163,548 | (46,243 | ) | (163,848 | ) | 311,319 | ||||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents |
| | | 2,320 | | 2,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents |
8,191 | (2,750 | ) | 18 | 367,056 | | 372,515 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning
of period |
10,659 | 2,753 | 4 | 517,890 | | 531,306 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period |
$ | 18,850 | $ | 3 | $ | 22 | $ | 884,946 | $ | | $ | 903,821 | ||||||||||||
37
Table of Contents
Note 16 Subsequent Event
On July 17, 2009, the exchange offer of the Company and Nabors Delaware to holders of
Nabors Delawares $1.125 billion 9.25% senior notes due 2019 expired. On July 23, 2009 Nabors Delaware
issued $1,069,392,000 registered 9.25% senior notes due 2019 in exchange for an equal amount of
its unregistered 9.25% senior notes due 2019 that were properly tendered.
38
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Nabors Industries Ltd.:
of Nabors Industries Ltd.:
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Nabors Industries Ltd. and its
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income for each of the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated statements of
cash flows and of changes in shareholders equity for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and
2008. This interim financial information is the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which
is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly,
we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
accompanying consolidated interim financial information for it to be in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity and of cash flows for the year
then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 27, 2009, except with respect
to our opinion on the consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the effects of the
changes in accounting for convertible debt instruments and participating securities included in the
computation of earnings per share discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, as
to which the date is May 29, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of June 30, 2009, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
HOUSTON, TEXAS
July 31, 2009
July 31, 2009
39
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We often discuss expectations regarding our future markets, demand for our products and
services, and our performance in our annual and quarterly reports, press releases, and other
written and oral statements. Statements that relate to matters that are not historical facts are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act). These forward-looking statements are based on an analysis of currently
available competitive, financial and economic data and our operating plans. They are inherently
uncertain and investors should recognize that events and actual results could turn out to be
significantly different from our expectations. By way of illustration, when used in this document,
words such as anticipate, believe, expect, plan, intend, estimate, project, will,
should, could, may, predict and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements.
You should consider the following key factors when evaluating these forward-looking
statements:
| fluctuations in worldwide prices of and demand for natural gas and oil; | ||
| fluctuations in levels of natural gas and oil exploration and development activities; | ||
| fluctuations in the demand for our services; | ||
| the existence of competitors, technological changes and developments in the oilfield services industry; | ||
| the existence of operating risks inherent in the oilfield services industry; | ||
| the existence of regulatory and legislative uncertainties; | ||
| the possibility of changes in tax laws; | ||
| the possibility of political instability, war or acts of terrorism in any of the countries in which we do business; and | ||
| general economic conditions including the capital and credit markets. |
Our businesses depend, to a large degree, on the level of spending by oil and gas companies
for exploration, development and production activities. Therefore, a sustained increase or decrease
in the price of natural gas or oil, which could have a material impact on exploration, development
and production activities, could also materially affect our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
The above description of risks and uncertainties is by no means all-inclusive, but is designed
to highlight what we believe are important factors to consider. For a more detailed description of
risk factors, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
filed with the SEC on March 2, 2009 and Exhibit 99.1 of Nabors Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on May 29, 2009 under section Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to
we, us, our, Company, or Nabors means Nabors Industries Ltd. and, where the context
requires, includes our subsidiaries.
Management Overview
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations is intended to help the reader understand the results of our operations and our
financial condition. This information is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in
conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to our
consolidated financial statements.
Nabors is the largest land drilling contractor in the world, with approximately 531 actively
marketed land drilling rigs. We conduct oil, gas and geothermal land drilling operations in the
U.S. Lower 48 states, Alaska, Canada, South America, Mexico, the
40
Table of Contents
Caribbean, the Middle East, the
Far East, Russia and Africa. We are also one of the largest land well-servicing and workover
contractors in the United States and Canada. We actively market approximately 594 land
workover and well-servicing rigs in the United States, primarily in the southwestern and western
United States, and actively market approximately 172 land workover and well-servicing rigs in
Canada. Nabors is a leading provider of offshore platform workover and drilling rigs, and actively
markets 40 platform rigs, 13 jack-up units and 3 barge rigs in the United States and multiple
international markets. These rigs provide well-servicing, workover and drilling services. We have
a 51% ownership interest in a joint venture in Saudi Arabia, which owns and actively markets 9 rigs
in addition to the rigs we lease to the joint venture. We also offer a wide range of ancillary
well-site services, including engineering, transportation, construction, maintenance, well logging,
directional drilling, rig instrumentation, data collection and other support services in selected
domestic and international markets. We provide logistics services for onshore drilling in Canada
using helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. We manufacture and lease or sell top drives for a broad
range of drilling applications, directional drilling systems, rig instrumentation and data
collection equipment, pipeline handling equipment and rig reporting software. We also invest in
oil and gas exploration, development and production activities in the U.S., Canada and
international areas through both our wholly-owned subsidiaries and our separate joint venture
entities in which we have 49.7% ownership interests in the U.S. and international entities and a
50% ownership interest in the Canadian entity. Each joint venture pursues development and
exploration projects with both existing customers of ours and with other operators in a variety of
forms including operated and non-operated working interests, joint ventures, farm-outs and
acquisitions.
The majority of our business is conducted through our various Contract Drilling operating
segments, which include our drilling, workover and well-servicing operations, on land and offshore.
Our oil and gas exploration, development and production operations are included in a category
labeled Oil and Gas for segment reporting purposes. Our operating segments engaged in drilling
technology and top drive manufacturing, directional drilling, rig instrumentation and software, and
construction and logistics operations are aggregated in a category labeled Other Operating Segments
for segment reporting purposes.
Our businesses depend, to a large degree, on the level of spending by oil and gas companies
for exploration, development and production activities. Therefore, a sustained increase or decrease
in the price of natural gas or oil, which could have a material impact on exploration, development
and production activities, could also materially affect our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
Natural gas prices are the primary drivers of our U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling and Canadian
Contract Drilling operations, while oil prices are the primary driver in our Alaskan,
International, U.S. Offshore (Gulf of Mexico), Canadian Well-servicing and U.S. Land Well-servicing
operations. The Henry Hub natural gas spot price averaged $5.93 per million cubic feet (mcf)
during the period from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, down from $8.31 per mcf average during
the period from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008. West Texas intermediate spot oil prices
averaged $70.44 per barrel during the period from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, down from a
$96.97 per barrel average during the period from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, there was a significant reduction in the demand for
natural gas that was caused, at least in part, by the significant deterioration of the global
economic environment including the extreme volatility in the capital and credit markets. Weaker
demand has resulted in a 67% decline in gas prices from the second quarter of fiscal year 2008
average of $11.36 per mcf to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 average of $3.71 per mcf. Oil
prices also declined significantly by 52% from the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 average of
$123.80 per barrel to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 average of $59.69 per barrel. These
reduced prices for natural gas and oil have led to a sharp decline in the demand for drilling and
workover services. Continued fluctuations in the demand for gas and oil, among other factors
including supply, could contribute to continued price volatility which may continue to affect
demand for our services. The following table sets forth natural gas and oil price data for each
quarter over the past two years:
41
Table of Contents
Average commodity prices, by quarter:
Gas (1) | Oil (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Twelve Month Period | Twelve Month Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Increase/ | June 30, | June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Period | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July September |
$ | 9.07 | $ | 6.18 | $ | 2.89 | 47 | % | $ | 118.23 | $ | 75.24 | $ | 42.99 | 57 | % | ||||||||||||||||
October December |
6.42 | 6.98 | (.56 | ) | (8 | %) | 59.06 | 90.49 | (31.43 | ) | (35 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
January March |
4.56 | 8.64 | (4.08 | ) | (47 | %) | 43.18 | 97.86 | (54.68 | ) | (56 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
April June |
3.71 | 11.36 | (7.65 | ) | (67 | %) | 59.69 | 123.80 | (64.11 | ) | (52 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
12 month average |
$ | 5.93 | $ | 8.31 | (2.38 | ) | (29 | %) | $ | 70.44 | $ | 96.97 | (26.53 | ) | (27 | %) |
(1) | Represents the average Henry Hub natural gas spot price ($/million cubic feet (mcf)) | |
(2) | Represents the average West Texas intermediate crude oil spot price ($/barrel) |
The decline in natural gas and oil prices, as discussed above, have also adversely affected
our customers spending plans for exploration, production and development activities which has had
a significant negative impact on our operations beginning in the latter part of 2008 and could
materially affect our future financial results.
Operating revenues and Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 totaled $859.7 million, representing a decrease of $418.6 million, or 33%, as
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008, and $2.0 billion for the six months ended June
30, 2009, representing a decrease of $580.4 million, or 23%, as compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008. Adjusted income derived from operating activities and net income (loss) for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $73.4 million and $(193.0) million ($(.68) per diluted
share), respectively, representing decreases of 72% and 209%, respectively, compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2008. Adjusted income derived from operating activities and net income
(loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $272.5 million and $(67.8) million ($(.24)
per diluted share), respectively, representing decreases of 51% and 117%, respectively, compared to
the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Our operating results during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 were lower than
prior year periods primarily due to the continuing weak environment in our U.S. Lower 48 Land
Drilling, U.S. Land Well-servicing, Canada Well-servicing and Drilling and U.S. Offshore operations
where activity levels and demand for our drilling rigs have decreased substantially in response to
uncertainty in the financial markets and commodity price deterioration. Operating results were
further negatively impacted by higher levels of depreciation expense due to our capital
expenditures in recent years and an increase in stock compensation expense.
Our operating results for 2009 are expected to decrease substantially from levels realized
during 2008 given our current expectation of the continuation of lower commodity prices during 2009
and the related impact on drilling and well-servicing activity and dayrates. We expect that the
decrease in drilling activity and dayrates will continue to have a significant impact on our U.S.
Lower 48 Land Drilling and our U.S. Land Well-servicing operations as the number of working rigs
and average dayrates decline. In our U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling operations, our rig count has
decreased from its peak during October 2008 of 273 rigs to 93 rigs currently operating as of July
29, 2009. Our Well-servicing activity is down approximately 51% from its October 2008 peak of
105,872 hours when compared to estimated rig hours of 51,796 for July 2009. We expect our
International operations to increase slightly during 2009 resulting from the deployment of new and
incremental rigs under long-term contracts and the renewal of multi-year contracts. Although rig
count is lower overall, the reductions are primarily comprised of lower yielding assets, leaving
higher margin contracts in place. Our investments in new and upgraded rigs over the past four
years have resulted in long-term contracts which we expect will enhance our competitive position
when market conditions improve.
42
Table of Contents
The following tables set forth certain information with respect to our reportable segments and rig
activity:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended June | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Increase/ | 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages and rig activity) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reportable segments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues and Earnings
(losses) from unconsolidated
affiliates: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract Drilling: (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling |
$ | 249,859 | $ | 438,848 | $ | (188,989 | ) | (43 | %) | $ | 639,738 | $ | 845,909 | $ | (206,171 | ) | (24 | %) | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Land Well-servicing |
100,080 | 182,222 | (82,142 | ) | (45 | %) | 234,442 | 353,363 | (118,921 | ) | (34 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Offshore |
41,947 | 65,723 | (23,776 | ) | (36 | %) | 102,339 | 117,178 | (14,839 | ) | (13 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Alaska |
53,207 | 45,114 | 8,093 | 18 | % | 115,989 | 99,483 | 16,506 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
45,035 | 67,782 | (22,747 | ) | (34 | %) | 157,180 | 246,634 | (89,454 | ) | (36 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
International |
327,551 | 342,892 | (15,341 | ) | (4 | %) | 670,207 | 646,464 | 23,743 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal Contract Drilling
(2) |
817,679 | 1,142,581 | (324,902 | ) | (28 | %) | 1,919,895 | 2,309,031 | (389,136 | ) | (17 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and Gas (3) (4) |
(6,001 | ) | 11,352 | (17,353 | ) | (153 | %) | (66,045 | ) | 25,392 | (91,437 | ) | (360 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Operating Segments (5)
(6) |
105,547 | 172,865 | (67,318 | ) | (39 | %) | 262,464 | 338,647 | (76,183 | ) | (22 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other reconciling items (7) |
(57,483 | ) | (48,431 | ) | (9,052 | ) | (19 | %) | (122,954 | ) | (99,296 | ) | (23,658 | ) | (24 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 859,742 | $ | 1,278,367 | $ | (418,625 | ) | (33 | %) | $ | 1,993,360 | $ | 2,573,774 | $ | (580,414 | ) | (23 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted income derived from operating
activities (8): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract Drilling: (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Lower 48 Land
Drilling |
$ | 70,075 | $ | 134,322 | $ | (64,247 | ) | (48 | %) | $ | 199,317 | $ | 261,193 | $ | (61,876 | ) | (24 | %) | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Land Well-servicing |
6,192 | 31,468 | (25,276 | ) | (80 | %) | 19,850 | 61,854 | (42,004 | ) | (68 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Offshore |
6,724 | 17,983 | (11,259 | ) | (63 | %) | 23,554 | 24,441 | (887 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Alaska |
16,374 | 13,466 | 2,908 | 22 | % | 37,199 | 31,249 | 5,950 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
(10,151 | ) | (14,326 | ) | 4,175 | 29 | % | 3,024 | 27,647 | (24,623 | ) | (89 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
International |
101,303 | 101,752 | (449 | ) | (0 | %) | 204,278 | 192,402 | 11,876 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal Contract
Drilling (2) |
190,517 | 284,665 | (94,148 | ) | (33 | %) | 487,222 | 598,786 | (111,564 | ) | (19 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and Gas (3)(4) |
(15,228 | ) | (1,645 | ) | (13,583 | ) | (826 | %) | (86,562 | ) | (6,497 | ) | (80,065 | ) | N/M | (9) | ||||||||||||||||
Other Operating Segments
(5)(6) |
4,925 | 19,006 | (14,081 | ) | (74 | %) | 24,029 | 31,440 | (7,411 | ) | (24 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other reconciling items
(10) |
(106,766 | ) | (36,907 | ) | (69,859 | ) | (189 | %) | (152,158 | ) | (72,179 | ) | (79,979 | ) | (111 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
73,448 | 265,119 | (191,671 | ) | (72 | %) | 272,531 | 551,550 | (279,019 | ) | (51 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(66,027 | ) | (49,375 | ) | (16,652 | ) | (34 | %) | (133,105 | ) | (96,067 | ) | (37,038 | ) | (39 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment income |
18,248 | 25,057 | (6,809 | ) | (27 | %) | 27,389 | 51,239 | (23,850 | ) | (47 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
43
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended June | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Increase/ | 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages and rig activity) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Losses) gains on sales and retirements
of long-lived assets and other income
(expense), net |
(6,469 | ) | (3,158 | ) | (3,311 | ) | (105 | %) | 10,828 | (11,255 | ) | 22,083 | 196 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairments and other charges
(11) |
(227,083 | ) | | (227,083 | ) | (100 | %) | (227,083 | ) | | (227,083 | ) | (100 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (207,883 | ) | $ | 237,643 | $ | (445,526 | ) | (187 | %) | $ | (49,440 | ) | $ | 495,467 | $ | (544,907 | ) | (110 | %) | ||||||||||||
Rig activity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rig years: (12) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling |
142.9 | 242.3 | (99.4 | ) | (41 | %) | 167.7 | 234.0 | (66.3 | ) | (28 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Offshore |
12.2 | 17.1 | (4.9 | ) | (29 | %) | 13.7 | 16.6 | (2.9 | ) | (17 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Alaska |
11.3 | 10.4 | 0.9 | 9 | % | 11.6 | 10.5 | 1.1 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
11.1 | 16.9 | (5.8 | ) | (34 | %) | 22.7 | 33.1 | (10.4 | ) | (31 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
International (13) |
104.1 | 121.5 | (17.4 | ) | (14 | %) | 109.0 | 119.6 | (10.6 | ) | (9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total rig years |
281.6 | 408.2 | (126.6 | ) | (31 | %) | 324.7 | 413.8 | (89.1 | ) | (22 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rig hours: (14) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Land Well-servicing |
142,797 | 272,101 | (129,304 | ) | (48 | %) | 322,364 | 531,578 | (209,214 | ) | (39 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Canada Well-servicing |
23,896 | 40,257 | (16,361 | ) | (41 | %) | 74,120 | 119,394 | (45,274 | ) | (38 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total rig hours |
166,693 | 312,358 | (145,665 | ) | (47 | %) | 396,484 | 650,972 | (254,488 | ) | (39 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | These segments include our drilling, workover and well-servicing operations, on land and offshore. | |
(2) | Includes earnings (losses), net from unconsolidated affiliates, accounted for using the equity method, of $.6 million and $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $1.9 million and $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. | |
(3) | Includes our proportionate share of non-cash pre-tax writedowns recorded by our domestic oil and gas joint venture of $(8.3) million and $(83.3) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. | |
(4) | Includes earnings (losses), net from unconsolidated affiliates, accounted for using the equity method, of $(11.0) million and $(6.7) million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $(83.3) million and $(24.6) million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. | |
(5) | Includes our drilling technology and top drive manufacturing, directional drilling, rig instrumentation and software, and construction and logistics operations. | |
(6) | Includes earnings (losses), net from unconsolidated affiliates, accounted for using the equity method, of $2.3 million and $(.1) million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $8.8 million and $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. | |
(7) | Represents the elimination of inter-segment transactions. | |
(8) | Adjusted income derived from operating activities is computed by subtracting direct costs, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, and depletion expense from Operating revenues and then adding Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates. Such amounts should not be used as a substitute to those amounts reported under GAAP. However, management evaluates the performance of our business units and the consolidated company based on several criteria, including adjusted income derived from operating activities, because it believes that this financial measure is an accurate reflection of the ongoing profitability of our Company. A reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to income (loss) before income taxes, which is a GAAP measure, is provided within the above table. |
44
Table of Contents
(9) | The percentage is so large that it is not meaningful. | |
(10) | Represents the elimination of inter-segment transactions and unallocated corporate expenses. | |
(11) | Represents non-cash pre-tax impairments and other charges recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2009. | |
(12) | Excludes well-servicing rigs, which are measured in rig hours. Includes our equivalent percentage ownership of rigs owned by unconsolidated affiliates. Rig years represent a measure of the number of equivalent rigs operating during a given period. For example, one rig operating 182.5 days during a 365-day period represents 0.5 rig years. | |
(13) | International rig years include our equivalent percentage ownership of rigs owned by unconsolidated affiliates which totaled 2.3 years and 4.0 years during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 2.6 years and 4.0 years for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. | |
(14) | Rig hours represents the number of hours that our well-servicing rig fleet operated during the year. |
Segment Results of Operations
Contract Drilling
Our Contract Drilling operating segments contain one or more of the following operations:
drilling, workover and well-servicing, on land and offshore.
U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling. The results of operations for this reportable segment are as
follows:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages and rig activity) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues and Earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | 249,859 | $ | 438,848 | $ | (188,989 | ) | (43 | %) | $ | 639,738 | $ | 845,909 | $ | (206,171 | ) | (24 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted income derived from operating
activities |
$ | 70,075 | $ | 134,322 | $ | (64,247 | ) | (48 | %) | $ | 199,317 | $ | 261,193 | $ | (61,876 | ) | (24 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Rig years |
142.9 | 242.3 | (99.4 | ) | (41 | %) | 167.7 | 234.0 | (66.3 | ) | (28 | %) |
Operating results decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared
to the prior year periods primarily due to a decline in drilling activity driven by lower natural
gas prices beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 and diminished demand as customers released rigs
and delayed drilling projects in response to the significant drop in natural gas prices and the
tightening of the credit markets. Operating revenues earned during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 includes $17.5 million and $48.8 million, respectively, related to early contract
termination revenue including approximately $7.7 million and $13.1 million, respectively, which
would have been earned during the current period regardless of early termination. We expect to
continue to recognize additional revenues corresponding to early termination of contracts for the
remainder of 2009 at a significantly diminished rate relative to each of the first and second
quarters of 2009. Operating results were further negatively impacted by higher depreciation
expense related to capital expansion projects completed in recent years.
45
Table of Contents
U.S. Land Well-servicing. The results of operations for this reportable segment are as
follows:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages and rig activity) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues and Earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | 100,080 | $ | 182,222 | $ | (82,142 | ) | (45 | %) | $ | 234,442 | $ | 353,363 | $ | (118,921 | ) | (34 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted income derived from operating
activities |
$ | 6,192 | $ | 31,468 | $ | (25,276 | ) | (80 | %) | $ | 19,850 | $ | 61,854 | $ | (42,004 | ) | (68 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Rig hours |
142,797 | 272,101 | (129,304 | ) | (48 | %) | 322,364 | 531,578 | (209,214 | ) | (39 | %) |
Operating results decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 over the
prior year periods primarily due to lower rig utilization and negative price erosion, driven by
lower customer demand stemming from lower oil prices. Operating results were further negatively
impacted by higher depreciation expense related to capital expansion projects completed in recent
years.
U.S. Offshore. The results of operations for this reportable segment are as follows:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages and rig activity) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues and Earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | 41,947 | $ | 65,723 | $ | (23,776 | ) | (36 | %) | $ | 102,339 | $ | 117,178 | $ | (14,839 | ) | (13 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted income derived from operating
activities |
$ | 6,724 | $ | 17,983 | $ | (11,259 | ) | (63 | %) | $ | 23,554 | $ | 24,441 | $ | (887 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Rig years |
12.2 | 17.1 | (4.9 | ) | (29 | %) | 13.7 | 16.6 | (2.9 | ) | (17 | %) |
The decrease in operating results during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the prior year periods primarily resulted from lower average dayrates and utilization
for the Super SundownerTM platform rigs, workover jack-up rigs and barge drilling and
workover rigs, partially offset by higher utilization of our SundownerR platform rigs
and MODS rigs.
Alaska. The results of operations for this reportable segment are as follows:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages and rig activity) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues and Earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | 53,207 | $ | 45,114 | $ | 8,093 | 18 | % | $ | 115,989 | $ | 99,483 | $ | 16,506 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted income derived from operating
activities |
$ | 16,374 | $ | 13,466 | $ | 2,908 | 22 | % | $ | 37,199 | $ | 31,249 | $ | 5,950 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Rig years |
11.3 | 10.4 | 0.9 | 9 | % | 11.6 | 10.5 | 1.1 | 10 | % |
The increase in operating results during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the prior year periods was primarily due to increases in average dayrates and drilling
activity. Drilling activity levels have continued to increase as a result of the deployment and
utilization of rigs added to the fleet in late 2007 under long-term contracts.
46
Table of Contents
Canada. The results of operations for this reportable segment are as follows:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages and rig activity) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues and Earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | 45,035 | $ | 67,782 | $ | (22,747 | ) | (34 | %) | $ | 157,180 | $ | 246,634 | $ | (89,454 | ) | (36 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted income (loss) derived from
operating activities |
$ | (10,151 | ) | $ | (14,326 | ) | $ | 4,175 | 29 | % | $ | 3,024 | $ | 27,647 | $ | (24,623 | ) | (89 | %) | |||||||||||||
Rig years |
11.1 | 16.9 | (5.8 | ) | (34 | %) | 22.7 | 33.1 | (10.4 | ) | (31 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rig hours |
23,896 | 40,257 | (16,361 | ) | (41 | %) | 74,120 | 119,394 | (45,274 | ) | (38 | %) |
Operating revenues and Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates decreased during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the prior year periods primarily as a result of
an overall decrease in drilling and well-servicing dayrates and activity due to lower customer
demand for drilling and well-servicing operations. Our operating results for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 were further negatively impacted by the economic uncertainty in the
Canadian drilling market and financial market instability.
The increase in adjusted income (loss) derived from operating activities during the three
months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the prior year quarter is primarily due to cost
reductions in direct costs, general and administrative expenses and depreciation. The decrease in
adjusted income derived from operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the prior year period reflects the decrease in drilling and well-servicing dayrates and
activity as discussed above.
International. The results of operations for this reportable segment are as follows:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages and rig activity) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues and Earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | 327,551 | $ | 342,892 | $ | (15,341 | ) | (4 | %) | $ | 670,207 | $ | 646,464 | $ | 23,743 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted income derived from operating
activities |
$ | 101,303 | $ | 101,752 | $ | (449 | ) | 0 | % | $ | 204,278 | $ | 192,402 | $ | 11,876 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Rig years |
104.1 | 121.5 | (17.4 | ) | (14 | %) | 109.0 | 119.6 | (10.6 | ) | (9 | %) |
The decrease in operating results during the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared
to the prior year quarter resulted primarily from lower utilization of rigs in Mexico, Libya,
Argentina and Colombia. Operating results were further negatively impacted by higher depreciation
expense related to capital expansion projects completed in recent years. These decreases are
partially offset by higher average dayrates from two jack-up rigs deployed in Saudi Arabia and
increases in average dayrates for our new and incremental rigs added and deployed during 2008.
The increase in operating results during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the
prior year period resulted primarily from higher average dayrates from two jack-up rigs deployed in
Saudi Arabia and increases in average dayrates for our new and incremental rigs added and deployed
during 2008. Operating results were also positively impacted by a start-up floating, drilling,
production, storage and offloading vessel offshore in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. These
increases were partially offset by the reduction in utilization in the Libya, Argentina and
Colombia markets.
47
Table of Contents
Oil and Gas
This operating segment represents our oil and gas exploration, development and production
operations. The results of operations for this reportable segment are as follows:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues and Earnings (losses)
from unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | (6,001 | ) | $ | 11,352 | $ | (17,353 | ) | (153 | %) | $ | (66,045 | ) | $ | 25,392 | $ | (91,437 | ) | (360 | %) | ||||||||||||
Adjusted income (loss) derived from
operating activities |
$ | (15,228 | ) | $ | (1,645 | ) | $ | (13,583 | ) | (826 | %) | $ | (86,562 | ) | $ | (6,497 | ) | $ | (80,065 | ) | N/M | (1) |
(1) | The percentage is so large that is not meaningful. |
Our operating results decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared
to the prior year period primarily due to declines in natural gas prices and production volumes
from our Ramshorn and joint venture operations.
Our operating results decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the
prior year periods primarily as a result of our domestic oil and gas joint ventures non-cash
pre-tax ceiling test writedown, of which our proportionate share totaled $75.0 million during the
first quarter of 2009. This writedown resulted from the ceiling test application of the full cost
method of accounting for costs related to oil and natural gas properties. Our U.S. joint venture
used a quarter end price of $3.78 per mcf for natural gas in calculating the ceiling test
limitation. Additionally, the prior year first quarter included a $12.3 million gain recorded from
the sale of oil and gas properties.
Other Operating Segments
These operations include our drilling technology and top drive manufacturing, directional
drilling, rig instrumentation and software, and construction and logistics operations. The results
of operations for these operating segments are as follows:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues and Earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates |
$ | 105,547 | $ | 172,865 | $ | (67,318 | ) | (39 | %) | $ | 262,464 | $ | 338,647 | $ | (76,183 | ) | (22 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted income derived from operating
activities |
$ | 4,925 | $ | 19,006 | $ | (14,081 | ) | (74 | %) | $ | 24,029 | $ | 31,440 | $ | (7,411 | ) | (24 | %) |
Operating results decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared
to the prior year periods primarily as a result of (i) lower demand in the U.S. and Canadian
drilling markets for rig instrumentation and data collection services from oil and gas exploration
companies, (ii) decreases in customer demand for our construction and logistics services in Alaska
and (iii) decreased top drive sales and lower service and rental activity.
OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
General and administrative expenses
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
$ | 163,808 | $ | 116,914 | $ | 46,894 | 40 | % | $ | 271,151 | $ | 228,235 | $ | 42,916 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
expenses as a
percentage of operating revenues |
18.9 | % | 9.1 | % | 10 | % | 108 | % | 13.1 | % | 8.8 | % | 4 | % | 49 | % |
48
Table of Contents
General and administrative expenses increased during the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 as compared to the prior year periods primarily as a result of an increase of
approximately $65.5 million and $79.8 million, respectively, in stock compensation expense. Total
share-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 included $72.1 million of
compensation expense related to previously granted restricted stock and option awards held by
Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello that was unrecognized as of April 1, 2009. The recognition of this
expense was a result of the provisions of their respective new employment agreements which
effectively eliminated the risk of forfeiture of such awards. This increase is partially offset
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to prior year periods by decreases of
approximately $10.1 million and $27.2 million, respectively, in wages and burden, primarily due to
reduced numbers of employees required to support operations in most of our operating segments and
cost reduction efforts across all business units. General and administrative expenses as a
percentage of operating revenues increased primarily due to lower revenues and higher compensation
expense recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
Depreciation and amortization, and depletion expense
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
$ | 165,974 | $ | 148,813 | $ | 17,161 | 12 | % | $ | 325,126 | $ | 285,013 | $ | 40,113 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Depletion expense |
$ | 2,590 | $ | 7,343 | $ | (4,753 | ) | (65 | %) | $ | 5,343 | $ | 21,028 | $ | (15,685 | ) | (75 | %) |
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the prior year periods as a result
of capital expansion projects completed in recent years.
Depletion expense. Depletion expense decreased during the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the prior year periods primarily as a result of decreased natural gas production
volumes.
Interest expense
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 66,027 | $ | 49,375 | $ | 16,652 | 34 | % | $ | 133,105 | $ | 96,067 | $ | 37,038 | 39 | % |
Interest expense increased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared
to the prior year periods as a result of the interest expense related to our January 2009 issuance
of $1.125 billion aggregate principal amount of 9.25% senior notes due January 2019 and our
February 2008 and July 2008 issuances of $575 million aggregate principal amount and $400 million
aggregate principal amount, respectively, of 6.15% senior notes due February 2018. The increase
was partially offset by a reduction to interest expense due to our repurchases of $888.5 million
par value of our $2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes during 2008 and the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
Investment income
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income |
$ | 18,248 | $ | 25,057 | $ | (6,809 | ) | (27 | %) | $ | 27,389 | $ | 51,239 | $ | (23,850 | ) | (47 | %) |
Investment income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 includes gains of $9.3
million and $13.0 million, respectively, from our trading securities and interest and dividend
income of $7.9 million and $13.8 million, respectively, from our other cash, short-term and
long-term investments.
49
Table of Contents
Investment income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 included gains of $13.3
million and $44.6 million, respectively, from our trading securities and interest income of $11.6
million and $23.0 million, respectively, from our other cash, short-term and long-term investments,
partially offset by losses from the portion of our long-term investments comprised of our actively
managed funds.
Gains (losses) on sales and retirements of long-lived assets and other income (expense), net
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase/ | Ended June 30, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains (losses) on
sales and
retirements of
long-lived assets
and other income
(expense), net |
$ | (6,469 | ) | $ | (3,158 | ) | $ | (3,311 | ) | (105 | %) | $ | 10,828 | $ | (11,255 | ) | $ | 22,083 | 196 | % |
The amount of gains (losses) on sales and retirements of long-lived assets and other
income (expense), net for the three months ended June 30, 2009 includes losses on retirements of
long-lived assets of approximately $3.0 million, increases to litigation reserves of $1.1 million,
a loss of $1.1 million on the fair value of our range cap and floor derivative and foreign currency
exchange losses of approximately $1.7 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the amount
of gains (losses) on sales and retirements of long-lived assets and other income (expense), net
included pre-tax gains of $16.0 million recognized on purchases of our $2.75 billion 0.94% senior
exchangeable notes due 2011, partially offset by losses on retirements of long-lived assets of
approximately $4.4 million.
The amount of gains (losses) on sales and retirements of long-lived assets and other income
(expense), net for the three months ended June 30, 2008 included losses on retirements on
long-lived assets of approximately $6.1 million partially offset by a gain of $1.5 million on a
derivative contract related to an interest rate swap. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the
amount of gains (losses) on sales and retirements of long-lived assets and other income (expense),
net included losses on retirements and impairment charges on long-lived assets of approximately
$10.5 million and increases to litigation reserves of $1.7 million.
Impairments and other charges
The table below summarizes the impairments and other charges recognized on our consolidated
statements of income (loss) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009:
Three and six | ||||
months ended | ||||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2009 | |||
Goodwill impairment |
$ | 14,689 | ||
Impairment of long-lived assets to be disposed of other than by sale |
64,229 | |||
Impairment of oil and gas financing receivable |
112,516 | |||
Credit related impairment on investment |
35,649 | |||
Total impairments and other charges |
$ | 227,083 | ||
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized goodwill impairment of approximately $14.7
million relating to Nabors Blue Sky Ltd., one of our Canadian subsidiaries reported in our Other
Operating segments. The impairment charge was a result of our annual impairment test on goodwill
which compared the estimated fair value of each of our reporting units to its carrying value. The
estimated fair value of Nabors Blue Sky Ltd. was determined using discounted cash flow models
involving assumptions based on our utilization of aircraft and revenues as well as direct costs,
general and administrative costs, depreciation, applicable income taxes, capital expenditures and
working capital requirements. During the year ended December 31, 2008, goodwill impairment of $4.6 million was recognized by this reporting unit.
The current quarter non-cash pre-tax impairment charge was deemed necessary due to the
continued deterioration during the quarter, and a now longer than previously expected
duration of the downturn in the oil and gas industry in Canada and the lack of certainty
regarding eventual recovery in the value of these operations. This downturn has resulted in
reduced capital spending on the part of our customers and has diminished demand for our drilling services and
for immediate access to remote drilling sites. The goodwill recorded in our Nabors Blue Sky Ltd.
reporting unit was fully impaired as of June 30, 2009, and as such, is not subject to further
impairment. A significantly prolonged period of lower oil and natural gas prices could continue to
adversely affect the demand for and prices of our services, which could result in future goodwill
impairment charges for other reporting units due to
50
Table of Contents
the potential impact on our estimate of our future operating results. See Note 2 (included
under the caption Goodwill) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008 for additional discussion and amounts of goodwill related to each of our reporting units.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we retired certain rigs and rig components in our
U.S. Offshore, Alaska, Canada and International Contract Drilling segments and reduced their
aggregate carrying value from $69.0 million to their estimated aggregate salvage value, resulting in impairment charges of approximately $64.2 million. The retirements included
certain inactive workover jack-up rigs in our U.S. Offshore and International operations, the
structural frames of certain incomplete coiled tubing rigs in our Canada operations and
miscellaneous rig components in our Alaska operations. The impairment charges resulted from
the continued deterioration during the quarter, and a now longer than previously expected duration of the downturn in the demand for
oil and gas drilling activities. During the quarter, uncertainty increased with respect to the timing of a market upturn of sufficient magnitude to return the affected
assets to service in the foreseeable future. As a result of these factors, we made the decision to retire these assets. A prolonged period of lower natural gas and oil
prices and its potential impact on our utilization and dayrates could result in the recognition of
future impairment charges on additional rigs if future cash flow estimates, based upon information
then available to management, indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable.
As of June 30, 2009, we recorded an impairment totaling $112.5 million to a certain oil and
gas financing receivable, which reduced the carrying value of our oil and gas financing receivables
recorded as long-term investments to $128.1 million. The impairment was primarily due to continued
commodity price deterioration and a longer than expected duration of the lower price environment during the second
quarter. This is expected to significantly reduce demand for future gas production and
development in the Barnett Shale area of north central Texas, which significantly influences capital expenditure decisions in the future.
The impairment was determined using
discounted cash flow models involving assumptions based on estimated cash flows for proved and
probable reserves, undeveloped acreage value, and current and expected natural gas prices. We
believe the estimates used provide a reasonable estimate of current fair value.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of
$40.3 million to a debt security issued by MBIA Insurance Inc. The credit loss related to the
other-than-temporary impairment was $35.6 million and the remaining $4.7 million was recorded as an
unrealized loss in accumulated comprehensive income (loss) in our consolidated statements of
changes in shareholders equity for the six months ended June 30, 2009. These bonds were
downgraded to non-investment grade level by Standard and Poors and Moodys Investors Service as of
June 30, 2009. The impairment of this investment was evaluated based on a variety of factors,
including the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost, the
financial condition of the issuer of the security as well as credit ratings and the recent
reorganization by MBIA Inc. While we do not intend to or anticipate the need to sell the
investment in the future for cash flow or working capital requirements, we currently believe that
we may not collect the full amounts due according to the contractual terms of the investment.
Income tax rate
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Increase/(Decrease) | 2009 | 2008 | Increase/(Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective Tax Rate |
7.2 | % | 25.8 | % | (18.6 | %) | (72 | %) | (37.2 | %) | 21.6 | % | (58.8 | %) | (272 | %) |
The decrease in our effective income tax rate during the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 compared to the prior year periods is a result of the proportion of income generated in
the U.S. versus the international jurisdictions in which we operate. Income generated in the U.S.
is generally taxed at a higher rate than income generated in international jurisdictions. We
expect to incur a loss in the U.S. for the year which will produce a tax benefit. Overall, we
expect to have a net tax benefit for the year as the U.S. tax benefit is expected to be in excess
of the tax expenses associated with our international operations. This will likely result in an
overall negative tax rate.
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In
the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the
ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities. Although
we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final outcome of tax audits and any related
litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in our income tax provisions
and accruals. Based on the results of an audit or litigation, a material effect on our financial
position, income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period or periods for which that
determination is made could result.
51
Table of Contents
Various bills have been introduced in Congress which could reduce or eliminate the tax
benefits associated with our reorganization as a Bermuda company. Legislation enacted by Congress
in 2004 provides that a corporation that reorganized in a foreign jurisdiction on or after March 4,
2003 shall be treated as a domestic corporation for United States federal income tax purposes.
Nabors reorganization was completed June 24, 2002. There has been and we expect that there may
continue to be legislation proposed by Congress from time to time which, if enacted, could limit or
eliminate the tax benefits associated with our reorganization.
Because we cannot predict whether legislation will ultimately be adopted, no assurance can be
given that the tax benefits associated with our reorganization will ultimately accrue to the
benefit of the Company and its shareholders. It is possible that future changes to the tax laws
(including tax treaties) could have an impact on our ability to realize the tax savings recorded to
date as well as future tax savings resulting from our reorganization.
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. One of the
most volatile factors in this determination is the relative proportion of our income being
recognized in high versus low tax jurisdictions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
Our cash flows depend, to a large degree, on the level of spending by oil and gas companies
for exploration, development and production activities. Sustained increases or decreases in the
price of natural gas or oil could have a material impact on these activities, and could also
materially affect our cash flows. Certain sources and uses of cash, such as the level of
discretionary capital expenditures, purchases and sales of investments, issuances and repurchases
of debt and of our common shares are within our control and are adjusted as necessary based on
market conditions. The following is a discussion of our cash flows for the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008.
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $1.0 billion during
the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $632.0
million during the prior year period. Net cash provided by operating activities (operating cash
flows) is our primary source of capital and liquidity. Factors affecting changes in operating cash
flows are largely the same as those that affect net earnings, with the exception of non-cash
expenses such as depreciation and amortization, depletion, impairments, share-based compensation,
deferred income taxes and our proportionate share of earnings or losses from unconsolidated
affiliates. Net income adjusted for non-cash components was approximately $709.5 million and
$749.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Additionally,
changes in working capital items such as collection of receivables can be a significant component
of operating cash flows. The net impact to operating cash flows
resulting from changes in working capital
items was $297.9 million provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and $117.4 million used by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Investing Activities. Net cash used for investing activities totaled $781.8 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to net cash used for investing activities of $573.1 million
during the prior year period. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, cash was used
primarily for capital expenditures totaling $710.8 million and $751.8 million, respectively, and
investments in unconsolidated affiliates totaling $100.7 million and $47.5 million, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, cash was derived from sales of investments, net
of purchases, totaling $17.0 million and $209.2 million, respectively.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $353.0 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $311.3 million during the prior year period. During
the six months ended June 30, 2009, cash was derived from the receipt of $1.1 billion in proceeds,
net of debt issuance costs, from the January 2009 issuance of $1.125 billion 9.25% senior notes due
2019, and cash totaling $689.7 million and $56.8 million was used to purchase our $2.75 billion
0.94% senior exchangeable notes due 2011 and our $225 million 4.875% senior notes, respectively.
Future Cash Requirements
As of June 30, 2009, we had long-term debt, including current maturities, of $4.2 billion and
cash and cash equivalents and investments of $1.3 billion, including $140.1 million of long-term
investments and other receivables. Long-term investments and other receivables include $128.1
million in oil and gas financing receivables.
52
Table of Contents
Our $225 million 4.875% senior notes are due in August 2009 and accordingly, are classified
as a current liability. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased $56.6 million
par value of these senior notes for cash totaling $56.8 million.
Our $2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes due 2011 provide that upon an exchange of
these notes, we will be required to pay holders of the notes cash up to the principal amount of the
notes and our common shares for any amount that the exchange value of the notes exceeds the
principal amount of the notes. The notes cannot be exchanged until the price of our shares exceeds
approximately $59.57 for at least 20 trading days during the period of 30 consecutive trading days
ending on the last trading day of the previous calendar quarter; or during the five business days
immediately following any ten consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per note
for each day of that period was less than 95% of the product of the sale price of Nabors common
shares and the then applicable exchange rate for the notes; or upon the occurrence of specified
corporate transactions set forth in the indenture. On July 29, 2009, the market price for our
shares closed at $16.17. If any of the events described above were to occur and the notes were
exchanged at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes, the required cash
payment could have a significant impact on our level of cash and cash equivalents and investments
available to meet our other cash obligations. Management believes that in the event that the price
of our shares were to exceed $59.57 for the required period of time that the holders of these notes
would not be likely to exchange the notes as it would be more economically beneficial to them if
they sold the notes to other investors on the open market. However, there can be no assurance that
the holders would not exchange the notes.
During 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2009 we purchased $888.5 million par value of
our $2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes due 2011 in the open market for cash totaling
$765.6 million, leaving approximately $1.86 billion par value outstanding.
As of June 30, 2009, we had outstanding purchase commitments of approximately $350.1 million,
primarily for rig-related enhancements, construction and sustaining capital expenditures and other
operating expenses. Total capital expenditures over the next twelve months, including these
outstanding purchase commitments, are currently expected to total approximately $600-700 million,
including currently planned rig-related enhancements, construction and sustaining capital
expenditures. This amount could change significantly based on market conditions and new business
opportunities. The level of our outstanding purchase commitments and our expected level of capital
expenditures over the next twelve months represent a number of capital programs that are currently
underway. These programs, which are nearing an end, have resulted in an expansion in the number of
drilling and well-servicing rigs that we own and operate and consist primarily of land drilling and
well-servicing rigs. The expansion of our capital expenditure programs to build new
state-of-the-art drilling rigs has impacted a majority of our operating segments, most
significantly within our U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling, U.S. Land Well-servicing, Alaska, Canada and
International operations.
We have historically completed a number of acquisitions and will continue to evaluate
opportunities to acquire assets or businesses to enhance our operations. Several of our previous
acquisitions were funded through issuances of our common shares. Future acquisitions may be paid
for using existing cash or issuance of debt or Nabors shares. Such capital expenditures and
acquisitions will depend on our view of market conditions and other factors.
See our discussion of guarantees issued by Nabors that could have a potential impact on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows in future periods included under
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements (Including Guarantees).
Our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K includes our contractual cash obligations as of December
31, 2008. Because of the significant change to our contractual cash obligations and as a result of
the issuance of Nabors Delawares $1.125 billion 9.25% senior notes due 2019 and our repurchases of
a portion of our $2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes and $225 million 4.875% senior notes
(see Note 7), we are presenting the following table in this Report which summarizes our remaining
contractual cash obligations related to commitments as of June 30, 2009:
Payments due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Total | < 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||
Contractual cash obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Principal |
$ | 4,405,902 | $ | 168,713 | (1) | $ | 1,862,022 | (2) | $ | 275,167 | (3) | $ | 2,100,000 | (4) | ||||||
Interest |
1,671,347 | 200,470 | 375,219 | 335,495 | 760,163 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 6,077,249 | $ | 369,183 | $ | 2,237,241 | $ | 610,662 | $ | 2,860,163 | ||||||||||
(1) | Represents the remaining portion of Nabors Holdings $225 million 4.875% senior notes due August 2009. |
53
Table of Contents
(2) | Represents the remaining portion of Nabors Delawares $2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes due May 2011. | |
(3) | Includes Nabors Delawares $275 million 5.375% senior notes due August 2012. | |
(4) | Represents Nabors Delawares aggregate $975 million 6.15% senior notes due February 2018 and $1.125 billion 9.25% senior notes due February 2019. |
No other significant changes have occurred to the contractual cash obligations information
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash
purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities, both in open market purchases, privately
negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on
prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other
factors. The amounts involved may be material.
In July 2006 our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program under which we may
repurchase up to $500 million of our common shares in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions. Through June 30, 2009, $464.5 million of our common shares had been repurchased under
this program. As of June 30, 2009, we had the capacity to repurchase up to an additional $35.5
million of our common shares under the July 2006 share repurchase program.
See Note 10 to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for discussion of
commitments and contingencies relating to (i) new employment agreements, effective April 1, 2009,
that could result in significant cash payments of $100 million and $50 million to Messrs. Isenberg
and Petrello, respectively, by the Company if their employment is terminated in the event of death
or disability or cash payments of $100 million and $58 million to Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello,
respectively, by the Company if their employment is terminated without cause or in the event of a
change in control and (ii) off-balance sheet arrangements (including guarantees).
Financial Condition and Sources of Liquidity
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term
investments and cash generated from operations. As of June 30, 2009, we had cash and cash
equivalents and investments of $1.3 billion (including $140.1 million of long-term investments and
other receivables, inclusive of $128.1 million in oil and gas financing receivables) and working
capital of $1.5 billion. Oil and gas financing receivables are classified as long-term
investments. These receivables represent our financing agreements for certain production payment
contracts in our Oil and Gas segment. This compares to cash and cash equivalents and investments
of $826.1 million (including $240.0 million of long-term investments and other receivables,
inclusive of $224.2 million in oil and gas financing receivables) and working capital of $1.0
billion as of December 31, 2008.
Our
gross funded debt to capital ratio was 0.43:1 as of June 30, 2009 and 0.41:1 as of December
31, 2008. Our net funded debt to capital ratio was 0.34:1 as of June 30, 2009 and 0.35:1 as of
December 31, 2008. The gross funded debt to capital ratio is calculated by dividing funded debt by
funded debt plus deferred tax liabilities net of deferred tax assets plus capital. Funded debt is
defined as the sum of (1) short-term borrowings, (2) current portion of long-term debt and (3)
long-term debt. Capital is defined as shareholders equity. The net funded debt to capital ratio is
calculated by dividing net funded debt by net funded debt plus deferred tax liabilities net of
deferred tax assets plus capital. Net funded debt is defined as the sum of (1) short-term
borrowings, (2) current portion of long-term debt and (3) long-term debt reduced by the sum of cash
and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments and other receivables. Capital is
defined as shareholders equity. Both of these ratios are a method for calculating the amount of
leverage a company has in relation to its capital. The gross funded debt to capital ratio and the
net funded debt to capital ratio are not measures of operating performance or liquidity defined by
GAAP and therefore, they may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other
companies.
Our interest coverage ratio from continuing operations was 11.4:1 as of June 30, 2009 and
20.7:1 as of December 31, 2008. The interest coverage ratio is a trailing twelve-month computation
of the sum of income (loss) before income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization,
depletion expense, impairments and our proportionate share of non-cash pre-tax writedowns from our
oil and gas joint ventures less investment income and then dividing by cash interest expense. This
ratio is a method for calculating the amount of operating cash flows available to cover cash
interest expense. The interest coverage ratio is not a measure of operating performance or
liquidity defined by GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other
companies.
54
Table of Contents
We have four letter of credit facilities with various banks as of June 30, 2009. Availability
and borrowings under our credit facilities as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Credit available |
$ | 245,180 | ||
Letters of credit outstanding |
143,275 | |||
Remaining availability |
$ | 101,905 | ||
Our ability to access capital markets or to otherwise obtain sufficient financing is enhanced
by our senior unsecured debt ratings as provided by Fitch Ratings, Moodys Investors Service and
Standard & Poors, which are currently BBB+, Baa1 and BBB+, respectively, and our historical
ability to access those markets as needed. However, recent instability in the global financial
markets has resulted in uncertainty related to the availability of funds from capital markets and
other credit markets. While there can be no assurances that we will be able to access these
markets in the future, we believe that we have the ability to access capital markets or otherwise
obtain financing in order to satisfy any payment obligation that might arise upon exchange or
purchase of our notes and that any cash payment due of this magnitude, in addition to our other
cash obligations, would not ultimately have a material adverse impact on our liquidity or financial
position. In addition, Standard & Poors affirmed its BBB+ credit rating, but revised its outlook
to negative from stable due primarily to worsening industry conditions. A credit downgrade by
Standard & Poors may impact our ability to access credit markets.
Our current cash and cash equivalents, investments and projected cash flows generated from
current operations are expected to adequately finance our purchase commitments, our scheduled debt
service requirements, and all other expected cash requirements for the next twelve months.
Other Matters
Recent Legislation and Actions
In February 2009 Congress enacted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the
Stimulus Act). The Stimulus Act is intended to provide a stimulus to the U.S. economy, including
relief to companies related to income on debt repurchases and exchanges at a discount, expansion of
unemployment benefits to former employees and other social welfare provisions. The Stimulus Act
has not had a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
A court in Algeria has entered a judgment of approximately $19.7 million against the Company
related to certain alleged customs infractions. The Company believes it did not receive proper
notice of the judicial proceedings against it, and that the amount of the judgment is excessive.
We have asserted the lack of legally required notice as a basis for challenging the judgment on
appeal. Based upon our understanding of applicable law and precedent, we believe that this
challenge will be successful. We do not believe that a loss is probable and have not accrued any
amounts related to this matter. However, the ultimate resolution of this matter, and the timing of
such resolution, is uncertain. If the Company is ultimately required to pay a fine or judgment
related to this matter, the amount of the loss could range from approximately $140,000 to
$19.7 million.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements for assets and
liabilities. We adopted and applied the provisions of SFAS No. 157 to our financial assets and
liabilities on January 1, 2008 and our nonfinancial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009. The
impact of SFAS No. 157 is provided in Note 5.
In December 2007 the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
141(R), Business Combinations. This statement retains the fundamental requirement in SFAS
No. 141, Business Combinations that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business
combinations and expands the same method of accounting to all transactions and other events in
which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses or assets at the acquisition
date and in subsequent periods. This statement replaces SFAS No. 141 by requiring measurement at
the acquisition date of the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interests. Additionally, SFAS No. 141(R) requires that acquisition-related costs,
including restructuring costs, be recognized as expense separately from the acquisition. SFAS No.
141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. We adopted SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009 and will apply it to future acquisitions.
55
Table of Contents
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement establishes the accounting and
reporting standards for a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. This statement clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership
interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. SFAS No. 160 requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure
requirements for existing minority interests and applies prospectively to business combinations for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008 the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment to FASB Statement No. 133. This statement is intended to improve
financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced
qualitative and quantitative disclosures regarding derivative instruments, gains and losses on such
instruments and their effects on an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS No. 161 on
January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008 the FASB issued FSP APB No. 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments
That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). This FSP
clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including
partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, Accounting for
Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants. Effective January 1, 2009, we
adopted the provisions of this FSP and applied them, on a retrospective basis, to our consolidated
financial statements. The impact of this FSP is provided in Note 7.
In June 2008 the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. This EITF provides that securities
which are granted in share-based transactions are participating securities prior to vesting if
they have a nonforfeitable right to participate in any dividends, and such securities therefore
should be included in computing basic earnings per share. Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted
the provisions of this EITF and applied them, on a retrospective basis, to our consolidated
financial statements. The impact of this EITF is provided in Note 11.
In December 2008 the SEC issued a Final Rule, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting. This
Final Rule revises certain oil and gas reporting disclosures in Regulation S-K and Regulation S-X
under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as well as Industry Guide 2. The amendments are
designed to modernize and update oil and gas disclosure requirements to align them with current
practices and changes in technology. Additionally, this new accounting standard requires that
entities use trailing twelve month average natural gas and oil prices when performing the full cost
ceiling test calculation which will impact the accounting practices of our oil and gas joint
ventures. The disclosure requirements are effective for registration statements filed on or after
January 1, 2010 and for annual financial statements filed on or after December 31, 2009. We are
currently evaluating the impact that this Final Rule may have on our consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.
This FSP provides additional guidance for determining whether a market for a financial asset is not
active and a transaction is not distressed for fair value measurements under SFAS No. 157. The
requirements of this FSP are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted the provisions of this FSP as of April 1, 2009 and
have applied them to our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009.
In April 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 115-2 and SFAS No. 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. This FSP changes the method for determining
whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists with respect to debt securities. The
requirements of this FSP are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted the provisions of this FSP as of April 1, 2009 and
have applied them to our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009. The impact of this FSP is provided in Notes 3 and 4.
In April 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This FSP increases the frequency of fair value disclosures
required by SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments from annual only
to quarterly reporting periods. The requirements of this FSP are effective for
56
Table of Contents
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
provisions of this FSP have been applied to our consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2009.
The impact of this FSP is provided in Note 5.
In June 2009 the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, which requires entities to
disclose the date through which they have evaluated subsequent events and whether the date
corresponds with the release of their financial statements. The requirements of SFAS No. 165 are
effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. SFAS No. 165 did not have any
impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Critical Accounting Estimates
We disclosed our critical accounting estimates in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 as adjusted by our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29,
2009. No significant changes have occurred to those policies except our adoption of SFAS No. 157
to our nonfinancial assets and liabilities effective January 1, 2009. See Note 3 for additional
discussion.
ITEM 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We may be exposed to market risks through changes in interest rates and foreign currency risk
arising from our operations in international markets as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. There have been no material changes in our exposure to
market risk from that disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
ITEM 4. | Controls and Procedures |
(a) | Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. We have investments in certain unconsolidated entities that we do not control or manage. Because we do not control or manage these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are necessarily more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries. | ||
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and principal accounting and financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and principal accounting and financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective, at the reasonable assurance level, in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and are effective, at the reasonable assurance level, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and principal accounting and financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | |||
(b) | Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act) during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting. |
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
Nabors and its subsidiaries are defendants or otherwise involved in a number of lawsuits in
the ordinary course of business. We estimate the range of our liability related to pending
litigation when we believe the amount and range of loss can be estimated. We record our best
estimate of a loss when the loss is considered probable. When a liability is probable and there is
a range of estimated loss with no best estimate in the range, we record the minimum estimated
liability related to the lawsuits or claims. As
57
Table of Contents
additional information becomes available, we assess the potential liability related to our
pending litigation and claims and revise our estimates. Due to uncertainties related to the
resolution of lawsuits and claims, the ultimate outcome may differ from our estimates. In the
opinion of management and based on liability accruals provided, our ultimate exposure with respect
to these pending lawsuits and claims is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position or cash flows, although they could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations for a particular reporting period.
On July 5, 2007, we received an inquiry from the U.S. Department of Justice relating to its
investigation of one of our vendors and compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The
inquiry relates to transactions with and involving Panalpina, a vendor which provides freight
forwarding and customs clearance services to certain of our affiliates. To date, the inquiry has
focused on transactions in Kazakhstan, Saudi Arabia, Algeria and Nigeria. The Audit Committee of
our Board of Directors has engaged outside counsel to review certain transactions with this vendor
and their review is ongoing. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has received periodic
updates at its regularly scheduled meetings and the Chairman of the Audit Committee has received
updates between meetings as circumstances warrant. The investigation includes a review of certain
amounts paid to and by Panalpina in connection with the obtaining of permits for the temporary
importation of equipment and clearance of goods and materials through customs. Both the SEC and
the U.S. Department of Justice have been advised of the Companys investigation. The ultimate
outcome of this review or the effect of implementing any further measures which may be necessary to
ensure full compliance with the applicable laws cannot be determined at this time.
A court in Algeria has entered a judgment of approximately $19.7 million against the Company
related to certain alleged customs infractions. The Company believes it did not receive proper
notice of the judicial proceedings against it, and that the amount of the judgment is excessive.
We have asserted the lack of legally required notice as a basis for challenging the judgment on
appeal. Based upon our understanding of applicable law and precedent, we believe that this
challenge will be successful. We do not believe that a loss is probable and have not accrued any
amounts related to this matter. However, the ultimate resolution of this matter, and the timing of
such resolution, is uncertain. If the Company is ultimately required to pay a fine or judgment
related to this matter, the amount of the loss could range from approximately $140,000 to
$19.7 million.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
There have been no material changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 in our
Risk Factors as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
We withheld the following shares of our common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations
during the three months ended June 30, 2009 from the distributions described below. These shares
may be deemed to be issuer purchases of shares that are required to be disclosed pursuant to this
Item:
(In thousands, except average price paid per share) | ||||||||||||||||
Approximate | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number | Dollar Value of | |||||||||||||||
of Shares | Shares that May | |||||||||||||||
Total | Purchased as | Yet Be | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Part of Publicly | Purchased | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Announced | Under the | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased (1) | per Share | Program | Program | ||||||||||||
April 1 April 30 , 2009 |
| $ | 11.10 | | | |||||||||||
May 1 May 31, 2009 |
| $ | 16.45 | | | |||||||||||
June 1 June 30, 2009 |
39 | $ | 15.29 | | |
(1) | Shares were withheld from employees to satisfy certain tax withholding obligations due in connection with grants of stock under our 2003 Employee Stock Plan. The 2003 Employee Stock Plan provides for the withholding of shares to satisfy tax obligations, but does not specify a maximum number of shares that can be withheld for this purpose. These shares were not purchased as part of a publicly announced program to purchase common shares. |
58
Table of Contents
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the 2009 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Nabors Industries Ltd. held June 2,
2009, holders of 270,556,215 shares were present in person or by proxy, constituting 86.59% of the
outstanding shares of Nabors entitled to vote as of the
Record Date for the Annual Meeting, which includes both common shares and the preferred share
voting on behalf of holders of common shares of Nabors Exchangeco (Canada) Inc. The matters voted
upon at the annual meeting were:
Election of two Class III Directors. The shareholders elected two Class III Directors to
serve for three year terms, expiring in 2012:
Eugene M. Isenberg
Votes cast in favor: |
227,878,058 | |||
Votes withheld: |
42,678,157 |
William T. Comfort
Votes cast in favor: |
161,181,147 | |||
Votes withheld: |
109,375,068 |
Appointment of Independent Auditors. The shareholders appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
independent auditors of Nabors, and authorized the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set
the auditors remuneration:
Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as Independent Auditors
Votes cast in favor: |
268,054,631 | |||
Votes cast against: |
2,145,323 | |||
Votes abstaining: |
356,261 |
Shareholder Proposal. The shareholders requested that the Board of Directors Executive
Compensation Committee establish a Pay for Superior Performance principal in the Companys
executive compensation plan for senior executives.
Votes cast in favor: |
96,069,173 | |||
Votes cast against: |
141,533,589 | |||
Votes abstaining: |
477,127 |
Shareholder Proposal. The shareholders requested that the Board of Directors establish a
policy that the Company will obtain shareholder approval for any future agreements that could
oblige the Company to make payments or awards in lieu of compensation following the death of senior
executives.
Votes cast in favor: |
96,459,764 | |||
Votes cast against: |
141,038,208 | |||
Votes abstaining: |
581,917 |
59
Table of Contents
Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description | |
3.1 |
Memorandum of Association of Nabors Industries Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Annex II to the proxy statement/prospectus included in Nabors Industries Ltd.s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-76198) filed with the Commission on May 10, 2002, as amended). | |
3.2 |
Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Nabors Industries Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Nabors Industries Ltd.s Form 10-Q (File No. 000-49887) filed with the Commission on August 3, 2005). | |
3.3 |
Amendment to Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Nabors Industries Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of Nabors Industries Ltd. Notice of Special General Meeting and Proxy Statement (File No. 001-32657) filed February 24, 2006). | |
3.4 |
Form of Resolution of the Board of Directors of Nabors Industries Ltd. authorizing the issue of Special Voting Preferred Share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Nabors Industries Ltd.s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-85228-99) filed with the Commission on June 11, 2002). | |
15 |
Awareness Letter of Independent Accountants. | |
31.1 |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification, executed by Eugene M. Isenberg, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nabors Industries Ltd. | |
31.2 |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification, executed by R. Clark Wood, principal accounting and financial officer of Nabors Industries Ltd. | |
32.1 |
Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), executed by Eugene M. Isenberg, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nabors Industries Ltd. and R. Clark Wood, principal accounting and financial officer of Nabors Industries Ltd. | |
101 |
The following materials from Nabors Industries Ltd.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss), (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
60
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. |
||||
By: | /s/ Eugene M. Isenberg | |||
Eugene M. Isenberg | ||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
By: | /s/ R. Clark Wood | |||
R. Clark Wood | ||||
Principal accounting and
financial officer |
||||
Date: July 31, 2009 |
61