Nano Magic Inc. - Quarter Report: 2005 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
ý Quarterly
report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
¨ Transition
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
COMMISSION
FILE NO. 1-11602
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS
|
76-0273345
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
|
|
3006
Longhorn Blvd., Suite 107
|
|
Austin,
Texas
|
78758
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(512)
339-5020
|
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
x
Yes o
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined
in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
x
Yes o
No
As
of
October 21, 2005, the registrant had 99,746,440 shares of common stock, par
value $.001 per share, issued and outstanding.
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC.
Page
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
||||
|
13
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ASSETS
|
(Unaudited)
September
30,
2005
|
December
31,
2004
|
|||||
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
932,638
|
$
|
901,585
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, trade - net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
64,851
|
6,735
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
132,493
|
85,135
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets
|
1,129,982
|
993,455
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
111,067
|
141,373
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
9,540
|
9,540
|
|||||
Total assets
|
$
|
1,250,589
|
$
|
1,144,368
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
184,099
|
$
|
140,597
|
|||
Obligations
under capital lease
|
11,535
|
21,430
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
72,623
|
74,956
|
|||||
Deferred
Revenue
|
-
|
54,985
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities
|
268,257
|
291,968
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Obligations
under capital lease
|
-
|
5,944
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities
|
268,257
|
297,912
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Stockholders'
(deficit):
|
|
|
|||||
Preferred
stock, $1.00 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized;
No
shares issued and outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock, $.00l par value, 120,000,000 shares authorized,
99,214,047
and 97,246,422 shares issued and outstanding at
September
30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively
|
99,214
|
97,246
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
84,404,984
|
80,822,625
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(83,521,866
|
)
|
(80,073,415
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity
|
982,332
|
846,456
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$
|
1,250,589
|
$
|
1,144,368
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
For the
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
|
For
the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||
|
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Government
contracts
|
$
|
85,697
|
$
|
90,501
|
$
|
173,307
|
$
|
222,179
|
|||||
Royalties
|
-
|
1,122
|
3,897
|
1,122
|
|||||||||
Other
|
160,220
|
8,850
|
226,072
|
55,548
|
|||||||||
Total
Revenues
|
245,917
|
100,473
|
403,276
|
278,849
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
620,079
|
635,105
|
1,875,371
|
1,916,512
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
640,481
|
573,706
|
1,999,564
|
1,357,738
|
|||||||||
Royalty
expense
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
500,000
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating
costs and expenses
|
1,260,560
|
1,208,811
|
3,874,935
|
3,774,250
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(1,014,643
|
)
|
(1,108,338
|
)
|
(3,471,659
|
)
|
(3,495,401
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest
Expense
|
(381
|
)
|
(1,224
|
)
|
(2,287
|
)
|
(3,493
|
)
|
|||||
Interest
Income
|
9,946
|
9,028
|
25,495
|
23,065
|
|||||||||
Other
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
125
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before taxes
|
(1,005,078
|
)
|
(1,100,534
|
)
|
(3,448,451
|
)
|
(3,475,704
|
)
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Provision
for taxes
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(1,005,078
|
)
|
$
|
(1,100,534
|
)
|
$
|
(3,448,451
|
)
|
$
|
(3,475,704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Loss
per share
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Basic
and Diluted
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic
and Diluted
|
99,179,808
|
96,800,352
|
98,729,768
|
96,450,666
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
For
the Nine Months Ended
September
30,
|
|||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(3,448,451
|
)
|
$
|
(3,475,704
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net
|
|||||||
cash
used in operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
42,258
|
38,864
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of fixed assets
|
-
|
(125
|
)
|
||||
Options
issued for services
|
19,339
|
116,600
|
|||||
Non-cash
variable option pricing expense
|
70,050
|
(297,300
|
)
|
||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable, trade
|
(58,116
|
)
|
(20,131
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(47,358
|
)
|
(71,233
|
)
|
|||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(13,816
|
)
|
115,185
|
||||
|
|||||||
Total
adjustments
|
12,357
|
(118,140
|
)
|
||||
|
|||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(3,436,094
|
)
|
(3,593,844
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(11,952
|
)
|
(95,331
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of fixed assets
|
-
|
125
|
|||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(11,952
|
)
|
(95,206
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Repayment
of notes payable
|
(15,839
|
)
|
(14,337
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
of stock issuance, net of costs
|
3,494,938
|
1,640,709
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
3,479,099
|
1,626,372
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
31,053
|
(2,062,678
|
)
|
||||
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
901,585
|
3,564,570
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
932,638
|
$
|
1,501,892
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis
of
Presentation
The
consolidated financial statements for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 have been prepared by us without audit pursuant
to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows as of September 30, 2005
and
2004, and for the periods then ended, have been made. Those adjustments consist
of normal and recurring adjustments. The consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2004, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance
sheet
as of that date.
Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in our annual financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with a reading of the financial statements and notes
thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.
The
results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September
30,
2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
full
year.
2. Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
Cash
paid
for interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, was $2,287
and $3,493 respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2005
and
2004, we had non-cash transactions related to variable option pricing and
options issued to a consultant. These transactions are described in greater
detail in Note 3.
3. Stockholders’
Equity
In
the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, we issued 1,200,000 restricted shares
of
our common stock and received net proceeds of $3,000,000 in an exempt offering
under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933. We issued 767,625 shares
of
our common stock and received $494,938 in connection with the exercise of
employee stock options, primarily by former employees.
In
the
nine months ended September 30, 2004, we issued 401,887 restricted shares
of our
common stock and received net proceeds of $1,065,000 in an exempt offering
under
Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933. We issued 799,464 shares of our
common stock and received $557,309 in connection with the exercise of employee
stock options, primarily by former employees, and issued 20,000 shares and
received $18,400 in connection with the exercise of warrants.
In
April
2001, the Company repriced a total of 900,500 options to lower the exercise
price of these options to $1.50, which was approximately 160% of the market
price of the stock at the time of the repricing. The repricing of these options
resulted in a new measurement date for accounting purposes and reclassification
of these options as variable plan awards beginning on the date of the repricing.
The Company previously accounted for these option grants as fixed plan awards.
From the date of the repricing through December 31, 2003, the quoted value
of
the Company’s common stock exceeded the exercise price and remained above it,
closing at $2.73 per share on December 31, 2003. The Company recorded $749,755
in non-cash option expense for the cumulative effects of the repricing and
increased additional paid-in capital by the same amount in 2003. During the
nine
months ended September 30, 2004, the price of the Company’s common stock
declined and closed at $2.13 on September 30, 2004. The Company reversed
$297,300 of the previously recorded expense in the nine months ended September
30, 2004, as a result of this price decline. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, the priced of the Company’s common stock increased from its
closing price of $2.17 on December 31, 2004 to $2.41 on September 30, 2005.
As a
result, the company recorded $70,050 in non-cash option expense and increased
additional paid-in capital by the same amount in the nine months ended September
30, 2005.
In
the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued 20,000 options to
a
consultant, 10,000 with an exercise price of $2.54 per share and 10,000 with
an
exercise price of $2.86 per share. In connection with these options, the
Company
recorded $19,339 as an expense during the period. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, we issued 100,000 options to a consultant with an exercise
price of $3.08 per share. In connection with the options, we recorded $116,600
as an expense during the period.
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
4. Contingencies
Litigation
We
are a
defendant in minor lawsuits described in greater detail in our 2004 annual
report on Form 10-K/A. We expect any potential eventual payment to have no
material affect on the financial statements.
In
April
2005, we filed suit against Canon, Inc. and Canon USA, Inc. in
the
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. We
are
seeking a declaratory judgment that new SED color
television products, scheduled to be manufactured by Canon and/or
Toshiba
beginning in 2005, are not covered under a 1999 patent license agreement
that we have with Canon. We assert that Canon is improperly
using our
patented technology to produce surface conductor electron emitter display
screens (SED) for a new generation of flat screen color televisions.
We also
assert that a joint venture formed by Canon and Toshiba Corporation
to
produce the SED display screens, SED, Inc., is not a licensed subsidiary
under the 1999 agreement and that Canon is improperly transferring
its
license rights under Nano-Proprietary's patents to the joint venture and
Toshiba. The suit also contained three additional claims related to a Lanham
Act
violation by Canon, tortuous interference by Canon, and a breach of covenant
of
good faith and fair dealings against Canon. Canon filed its response in July
2005 denying liability in the matter. In September 2005, Canon filed a motion
to
dismiss Canon USA, Inc. from the case and dismiss the Lanham Act claim, the
tortuous interference claim, and the breach of covenant of good faith and
fair
dealings. In October 2005, the judge in the case denied Canon’s motion to
dismiss Canon, USA, Inc. and the breach of covenant of good faith and fair
dealings claim. The judge granted Canon’s motion, without prejudice, to dismiss
the Lanham Act claim and the tortuous interference claim. Dismissal without
prejudice allows us to re-file these claims at any time if additional evidence
supporting these claims becomes available to us in the discovery process.
The
first two claims described above were not at issue in the dismissal motion
by
Canon. The case is currently in the discovery phase and a trial date has
been
set for March 2007.
5. Business
Segments
Following
is information related to our business segments for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004:
|
ANI
|
EBT
|
All
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
403,276
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
403,276
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Profit
(Loss)
|
(2,791,244
|
)
|
-
|
(657,207
|
)
|
(3,448,451
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Expenditures
for
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
long-lived
assets
|
8,297
|
-
|
3,655
|
11,952
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
278,849
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
278,849
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Profit
(Loss)
|
(3,122,054
|
)
|
107,297
|
(460,947
|
)
|
(3,475,704
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Expenditures
for
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
long-lived
assets
|
92,958
|
-
|
2,373
|
95,331
|
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
6. Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In
December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment ("SFAS No. 123R"), which requires
that
the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized
in financial statements based on the provisions of SFAS 123 issued in 1995.
The
Company currently accounts for stock-based compensation using APB 25 and
discloses pro forma compensation expense quarterly and annually by calculating
the stock option grants' fair value using the Black-Scholes model and disclosing
the impact on net income and earnings (loss) per share in a Note to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Upon adoption, pro forma disclosure will
no
longer be an alternative. SFAS 123R is effective for the first annual period
beginning after June 15, 2005. Accordingly, we will adopt this provision
for its
financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. The financial
impact
of adopting SFAS 123R cannot be predicted, however it will likely have a
material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
7. Subsequent
Events
We
received $48,000 and issued 50,000 shares of common stock in connection with
the
exercise of stock options during the period from October 1, 2005 through
October
21, 2005. We also issued 482,393 shares of our common stock for $1,000,000
in a
private placement under rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of
1933.
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors
that have affected our financial position and operating results during the
periods included in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
Form
10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements that we believe are within
the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the
safe
harbors created by such acts. For this purpose, any statements that are not
statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements,
including the statements under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" regarding our strategy, future
operations, future expectations or future estimates, financial position and
objectives of management. Those statements in this Form 10-Q containing the
words "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects" and similar expressions
constitute forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking
statements contain such identifying words. These forward-looking statements
are
based on our current expectations and are subject to a number of risks,
uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations,
competitive factors, shifts in market demand and other risks and
uncertainties.
Although
we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements
are
reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and actual results
may
differ from those indicated by the forward-looking statements included in
this
Form 10-Q. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q, you should not consider
the inclusion of such information as a representation by us or anyone else
that
we will achieve such results. Moreover, we assume no obligation to update
these
forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions
or
changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
OVERVIEW
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2005, our primary revenues were earned
as a
result of reimbursed research expenditures at our Applied Nanotech, Inc.
(“ANI”)
subsidiary. We continued to incur substantial expenses in support of the
development of our proprietary Carbon Nanotube Based Field Emission (“CFE”)
Technology and other technologies. As more fully discussed in our Annual
Report
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, we expect to incur
additional research and development expenses throughout 2005 in developing
our
technology. We are focused on licensing our technology and obtaining sufficient
revenue to cover our ongoing research expenditures.
OUTLOOK
We
expect
our present cash balance of approximately $1.7 million as of the date of
this
filing, when combined with expected revenue sources, to enable us to operate
at
least through the end of the first quarter 2006. We have a plan to achieve
profitability in 2006. There can be no assurance that we will achieve
profitability, or even break-even, in the future. To the extent our revenues
do
not allow us to break-even, or if the timing of revenues does not match with
expenses, we could be required to raise additional funds through the issuance
of
debt or equity securities to enable us to maintain operations at the present
level. The mix of revenues received could also cause the revenues required
to
reach break-even to increase. If revenue producing projects require
unanticipated expenses, or heavier than anticipated use of outside services
or
materials, we may be unable to achieve profitability at the expected level
of
revenues.
We
have
developed a plan to allow ourselves to maintain operations until we are able
to
sustain ourselves on our own revenue. Our plan is primarily dependent on
raising
funds through the licensing of our technology and reimbursed research contracts.
Our current cash of approximately $1.7 million as of the date of this filing
is
sufficient to allow us to maintain operations through at least the end of
the
first quarter 2006. We expect additional revenue producing projects or license
agreements to be finalized during that time period. We believe that we have
the
ability to continue to raise funding, if necessary, to enable us to continue
operations until our plan can be completed.
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS (cont.)
This
plan
is based on current development plans, current operating plans, the current
regulatory environment, historical experience in the development of electronic
products and general economic conditions. Changes could occur which would
cause
certain assumptions on which this plan is based to be no longer valid. Although
we do not expect funding our operations to be a problem, if adequate funds
are
not available from operations, or additional sources of financing, we may
have
to eliminate, or reduce substantially, expenditures for research and
development, testing and production of its products, or obtain funds through
arrangements with other entities that may require us to relinquish rights
to
certain of our technologies or products. Such results would materially and
adversely affect us.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
In
April
2005, we filed suit against Canon, Inc. and Canon USA, Inc. in the U.S. District
Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. We are seeking
a
declaratory judgment that new SED color television products,
scheduled to be manufactured by Canon and/or Toshiba beginning in 2005, are
not
covered under a 1999 patent license agreement that we have with
Canon. We assert that Canon is improperly using our patented
technology to produce surface conductor electron emitter display screens
(SED)
for a new generation of flat screen color televisions. We also
assert that a joint venture formed by Canon and Toshiba Corporation
to
produce the SED display screens, SED, Inc., is not a licensed subsidiary
under the 1999 agreement and that Canon is improperly transferring
its
license rights under Nano-Proprietary's patents to the joint venture and
Toshiba. The suit also contained three additional claims related to a Lanham
Act
violation by Canon, tortuous interference by Canon, and a breach of covenant
of
good faith and fair dealings against Canon. Canon filed its response in July
2005 denying liability in the matter. In September 2005, Canon filed a motion
to
dismiss Canon USA, Inc. from the case and dismiss the Lanham Act claim, the
tortuous interference claim, and the breach of covenant of good faith and
fair
dealings. In October 2005, the judge in the case denied Canon’s motion to
dismiss Canon, USA, Inc. and the breach of covenant of good faith and fair
dealings claim. The judge granted Canon’s motion, without prejudice, to dismiss
the Lanham Act claim and the tortuous interference claim. Dismissal without
prejudice allows us to re-file these claims at any time if additional evidence
supporting these claims becomes available to us in the discovery process.
The
first two claims described above were not at issue in the dismissal motion
by
Canon. The case is currently in the discovery phase and a trial date has
been
set for March 2007. Our attorneys are handling this on contingency, so continued
activity in this case will not be an unmanageable drain on our
resources.
In
the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, we received two
new
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grants, totaling approximately
$165,000, from the U.S. Air Force. One of these grants relates to the
development of low-maintenance sensors, the other relates to carbon nanotube
based radar applications. Both of the projects are expected to be completed
by
the end of first quarter of 2006.
In
July
2005, our Applied Nanotech, Inc. subsidiary completed a license agreement
with
Kelman, Ltd for ANI’s proprietary Hydrogen Sensor technology. Under the terms of
this agreement, Kelman has the exclusive right through June 30, 2006 to use
ANI’s Hydrogen Sensors in power transformers. Kelman can extend this exclusivity
period on a year by year basis by making certain pre-defined minimum royalty
payments. ANI will also initially manufacture and sell hydrogen sensors to
Kelman.
In
October 2005, we issued 482,393 shares of our common stock for $1,000,000
in a
private placement under rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of
1933.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment ("SFAS No. 123R"), which requires
that
the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized
in financial statements based on the provisions of SFAS 123 issued in 1995.
The
Company currently accounts for stock-based compensation using APB 25 and
discloses pro forma compensation expense quarterly and annually by calculating
the stock option grants' fair value using the Black-Scholes model and disclosing
the impact on net income and earnings (loss) per share in a Note to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Upon adoption, pro forma disclosure will
no
longer be an alternative. SFAS 123R is effective for the first annual period
beginning after June 15, 2005. Accordingly, we will adopt this provision
for its
financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. The financial
impact
of adopting SFAS 123R cannot be predicted, however it will likely have a
material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS (cont.)
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Our
cash
position remained virtually unchanged during the period. At September 30,
2005,
we had cash and cash equivalents in the amount of $932,638 as compared with
cash
and cash equivalents of $901,585 at December 31, 2004. This increase in cash
is
primarily the result of cash provided by financing activities, offset by
cash
used in operating activities.
As
described in greater detail in the notes to the financial statements, we
received net proceeds of $3,494,938 from the issuance of common stock related
to
private placements and option exercises during the nine months ended September
30, 2005 (the “2005 Period”), as compared with $1,640,709 from the issuance of
common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 (the “2004
Period”). The majority of the common stock issued in the 2005 Period was the
result of the private placement in February 2005 in which 1,200,000 shares
of
stock were issued in exchange for net proceeds of $3,000,000.
Our
cash
used in operating activities decreased from $3,593,844 in the 2004 Period
to
$3,436,094 in the 2005 Period. This is primarily the result of operating
factors
discussed below in the “Results of Operations” section. We expect our cash used
in operating activities to decrease in future quarters in 2005 as a result
of
increasing revenues, while expenses remain relatively constant.
We
used
net cash of $95,206 for investing activities in the 2004 Period related to
the
purchase of research equipment, compared with cash used in investing activities
related to equipment purchases of $11,952 in the 2005 Period. We expect cash
used in investing activities to remain at relatively insignificant levels
for
the balance of 2005.
The
principal source of our liquidity has been funds received from exempt offerings
of common stock. In the event that we need additional funds, we may seek
to sell
additional debt or equity securities. While we expect to be able to obtain
any
funds needed for operations, there can be no assurance that any of these
financing alternatives can be arranged on commercially acceptable terms.
We
believe that our success in reaching profitability will be dependent on our
patent portfolio and upon the viability of products using our technology
and
their acceptance in the marketplace, as well as our ability to obtain additional
debt or equity financings in the future, if needed.
We
expect
to continue to incur substantial expenses for research and development
("R&D"). Further, we believe that certain products that may be developed by
potential licensees of our technology may not be available for commercial
sale
or routine use for a period of one to two years. Others are expected to be
available in 2005. While we would likely receive initial license payments,
ongoing royalty streams related to those licenses will not be available until
potential licensees have introduced products using our technology. Therefore,
it
is possible that the commercialization of our existing and proposed products
may
require additional capital in excess of our current funding. We do, however,
have a plan to operate profitably in 2006 based on the receipt of research
funding and other revenues. Achievement of at least break-even would enable
us
to continue our research without seeking additional debt or equity
financing.
Because
the timing and receipt of revenues from the license or royalty agreements
will
be tied to the achievement of certain product development, testing and marketing
objectives, which cannot be predicted with certainty, there may be substantial
fluctuations in our results of operations. If revenues do not increase as
rapidly as anticipated, or if product development and testing require more
funding than anticipated, we may be required to curtail our operations or
seek
additional financing from other sources. The combined effect of the foregoing
may prevent us from achieving sustained profitability for an extended period
of
time.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Our
loss
for the third quarter ended September 30, 2005 was $1,005,078 as compared
with
the loss of $1,100,534 for the same period last year. The main reason for
the
decreased loss in 2005 was the increased revenue in 2005. Our loss of $3,448,451
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was slightly lower than the
loss of
$3,475,704 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. This decreased loss
was
the result of reasons set forth below. We expect our quarterly loss to be
reduced in the fourth quarter of 2005 from the losses incurred in the first
three quarters of 2005.
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS (cont.)
Our
revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, totaled $245,917 compared
to
$100,473 for the same quarter of 2004. For the nine-month period ended September
30, 2005 (the “2005 Period”), our revenues were $403,276 as compared with
$278,849 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 (the “2004 Period”).
The revenues in both periods were all from ANI and substantially all the
result
of reimbursed research expenditures. The majority of revenues in the 2004
Period
came from government contracts. In the 2005 Period, the majority of the revenue
came from private sources. At the present stage of our development, significant
conclusions can’t be drawn from comparing revenues from period to period. Our
business strategy is built on developing a royalty stream from licensing
our
intellectual property. To supplement this, we also seek funding from both
governmental and private sources to help fund our research. Until we are
able to
develop a steady revenue stream from royalties, our revenues will tend to
fluctuate greatly from quarter to quarter and may not be a significant source
of
operating cash for us. Our private research funding tends to come in large
amounts at sporadic times.
We
have
three government programs in progress at September 30, 2005, and we have
a
revenue backlog of $77,289 related to those contracts. We have a total revenue
backlog of $470,139 as of September 30, 2005. We had a total revenue backlog
of
$212,722 as of September 30, 2004, all of which related to one government
contract. Our ability to perform continued research, or fulfill our backlog,
should not require significant additional personnel.
We
incurred research and development expenses of $1,875,371 for the 2005 Period,
which was similar to the amount of $1,916,512 incurred in the 2004 Period.
The
majority of our research and development expenditures are relatively fixed
and
include salaries and related cost, facilities costs, etc. The variable portion
relates to spending on outside materials and consultants and was relatively
similar from year to year. We expect total research and development expense
to
remain relatively constant in the fourth quarter of 2005. Research and
development expenditures could increase if we received funding for any
significant new projects, however that would result in an increase in revenue
as
well.
Our
selling, general, and administrative expenses were $1,999,564 for the 2005
Period, compared with $1,357,738 for the 2004 Period - an increase of $641,826.
The majority of this increase, or $367,350, was the result of a non-cash
item
related to variable option pricing. In April 2001, we repriced a total of
900,500 options to lower the exercise price of these options to $1.50, which
was
approximately 160% of the market price of the stock at the time of the
repricing. The repricing of these options resulted in a new measurement date
for
accounting purposes and reclassification of these options as variable plan
awards beginning on the date of the repricing. The Company previously accounted
for these option grants as fixed plan awards. In 2003, our common stock price
exceeded the exercise price for the first time since the repricing and remained
above it, closing at $2.73 per share on December 31, 2003. The Company recorded
$749,755 in non-cash option expense for the cumulative effects of the repricing
and increased additional paid in capital by the same amount in
2003.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the price of our common stock declined
and closed at $2.13 on September 30, 2004. We reversed $297,300 of the
previously recorded expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2004,
as a
result of this price decline. During the 2005 Period, we recorded an additional
expense of $70,050. The remainder of the increase relates primarily to human
resource related costs, including salary and consulting fees paid to a new
hire,
as well as significant out of pocket expenses related to the Canon lawsuit,
which were approximately $110,000 during the period. Our attorneys are handling
the Canon litigation on contingency, however we are responsible for out of
pocket costs, including local counsel in Austin Texas.
Our
royalty expense was $500,000 in the 2004 Period. The royalty expense results
from minimum payments due in connection with our Keesman patent license.
We had
no such expense in the 2005 Period. No further future minimum royalty payments
are due under this agreement, and we expect royalty expense in future periods
to
be highly correlated with royalty income.
Our
interest expense and interest income remained substantially the same in the
two
periods. Our only remaining interest expense relates to capital leases. Our
interest income is a result of the investment of excess funds in short term
interest bearing instruments, primarily certificates of deposit, commercial
paper, and money market funds. We expect both to remain relatively insignificant
in the foreseeable future.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE
AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
We
do not
use any derivative financial instruments for hedging, speculative, or trading
purposes. Our exposure to market risk is currently immaterial.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS
AND
PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Based
on
their evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company have each concluded that such disclosure
controls and procedures are effective and sufficient to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized
and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by
the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act
is
accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its
principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There
have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In
April
2005, we filed suit against Canon, Inc. and Canon USA, Inc. in
the
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. We
are
seeking a declaratory judgment that new SED color
television products, scheduled to be manufactured by Canon and/or
Toshiba
beginning in 2005, are not covered under a 1999 patent license agreement
that we have with Canon. We assert that Canon is improperly
using our
patented technology to produce surface conductor electron emitter display
screens (SED) for a new generation of flat screen color televisions.
We also
assert that a joint venture formed by Canon and Toshiba Corporation
to
produce the SED display screens, SED, Inc., is not a licensed subsidiary
under the 1999 agreement and that Canon is improperly transferring
its
license rights under Nano-Proprietary's patents to the joint venture and
Toshiba. The suit also contained three additional claims related to a Lanham
Act
violation by Canon, tortuous interference by Canon, and a breach of covenant
of
good faith and fair dealings against Canon. Canon filed its response in July
2005 denying liability in the matter. In September 2005, Canon filed a motion
to
dismiss Canon USA, Inc. from the case and dismiss the Lanham Act claim, the
tortuous interference claim, and the breach of covenant of good faith and
fair
dealings. In October 2005, the judge in the case denied Canon’s motion to
dismiss Canon, USA, Inc. and the breach of covenant of good faith and fair
dealings claim. The judge granted Canon’s motion, without prejudice, to dismiss
the Lanham Act claim and the tortuous interference claim. Dismissal without
prejudice allows us to re-file these claims at any time if additional evidence
supporting these claims becomes available to us in the discovery process.
The
first two claims described above were not at issue in the dismissal motion
by
Canon. The case is currently in the discovery phase and a trial date has
been
set for March 2007.
(a) Exhibits:
See Index to Exhibits on page 17 for a descriptive
response to this item.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
|
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
Date: October
28, 2005
|
/s/
Marc W. Eller
Marc
W. Eller
Chairman
and Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
Date: October
28, 2005
|
/s/
Douglas P. Baker
Douglas P. Baker Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting
Officer)
|
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
The
following documents are filed as part of this Report:
17