Nano Magic Inc. - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
ý
Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
¨ Transition
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
COMMISSION
FILE NO. 1-11602
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS
|
76-0273345
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
|
|
3006
Longhorn Blvd., Suite 107
|
|
Austin,
Texas
|
78758
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(512)
339-5020
|
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
[X] Yes [
] No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.
Large
Accelerated Filer ¨
Accelerated Filer þ
Non-Accelerated Filer ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
[
] Yes [ X]
No
As
of
July 28, 2006, the registrant had 100,750,823 shares of common stock, par value
$.001 per share, issued and outstanding.
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC.
Page
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
||||
|
13
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|||
|
15
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE
SHEETS
ASSETS
|
|
(Unaudited)
June
30,
2006
|
December
31,
2005
|
||
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,365,210
|
$
|
897,247
|
|
Accounts
receivable, trade - net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
67,598
|
|
94,103
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
156,785
|
|
85,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
1,589,593
|
|
1,076,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
98,208
|
|
101,785
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
9,540
|
|
9,540
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,697,341
|
$
|
1,187,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
1,240,568
|
$
|
231,131
|
|
Obligations
under capital lease
|
|
-
|
|
4,348
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
89,317
|
93,163
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
1,329,885
|
|
328,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations
under capital lease
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
1,329,885
|
|
328,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
(deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $1.00 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized;
No
shares issued and outstanding
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
Common
stock, $.00l par value, 120,000,000 shares authorized,
101,696,440
and 99,746,440 shares issued and outstanding at
June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively
|
|
100,696
|
|
99,746
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
98,454,563
|
|
95,767,647
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
(98,187,803)
|
|
(95,008,054)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
367,456
|
|
859,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$
|
1,697,341
|
$
|
1,187,981
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
3
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
For the
Three Months
Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
For
the Six Months
Ended
June 30,
|
|||||||||
|
|
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Government
contracts
|
$
|
7,532
|
|
$
|
69,243
|
|
$
|
71,114
|
|
$
|
87,610
|
||
|
Royalties
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,897
|
||
|
Other
|
|
107,477
|
|
|
19,301
|
|
|
206,079
|
|
|
65,852
|
||
|
Total
Revenues
|
|
115,009
|
|
|
88,544
|
|
|
277,193
|
|
|
157,359
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Research
and development
|
|
872,255
|
|
|
600,125
|
|
|
1,654,309
|
|
|
1,310,598
|
|||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
1,730,561
|
|
|
874,670
|
|
|
2,907,884
|
|
|
1,601,807
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Operating
costs and expenses
|
|
2,602,816
|
|
|
1,474,795
|
|
|
4,562,193
|
|
|
2,912,405
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gain
on sale of intellectual property and other assets
|
(1,100,000)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,100,000)
|
|
|
-
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
|
(1,387,807)
|
|
|
(1,386,251)
|
|
|
(3,185,000)
|
|
|
(2,755,046)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other
income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
(183)
|
|
|
(880)
|
|
|
(296)
|
|
|
(1,906)
|
||
|
Interest
Income
|
2,407
|
10,922
|
5,547
|
15,549
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss
from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
(1,385,583)
|
|
|
(1,376,209)
|
|
|
(3,179,749)
|
|
|
(2,741,403)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision
for taxes
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$
|
(1,385,583)
|
|
$
|
(1,376,209)
|
|
$
|
(3,179,749)
|
|
$
|
(2,741,403)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loss
per share
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01)
|
|
$
|
(0.01)
|
|
$
|
(0.03)
|
|
$
|
(0.03)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted
|
|
|
|
101,511,825
|
|
|
99,081,410
|
|
|
100,265,915
|
|
|
98,501,019
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
4
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
For
the Six Months Ended
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
$
|
(3,179,749)
|
$
|
(2,741,403)
|
||||||
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
cash
used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
|
21,206
|
|
28,605
|
||||||
|
|
|
Stock
based compensation expense
|
|
787,866
|
|
351,194
|
||||||
Issuance
of shares to ATI
|
400,000
|
-
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, trade
|
|
26,505
|
|
(54,896)
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
(71,479)
|
|
(132,897)
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
1,005,591
|
|
64,584
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
Total
adjustments
|
|
2,169,689
|
|
256,590
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
(1,010,060)
|
|
(2,484,813)
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Purchases
of fixed assets
|
|
(17,629)
|
|
(6,514)
|
|||||||
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
(17,629)
|
|
(6,514)
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Repayment
of capital leases
|
|
(4,348)
|
|
(10,428)
|
|||||||
|
|
Proceeds
of stock issuance, net of costs
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
3,477,938
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
1,495,652
|
|
3,467,510
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
467,963
|
|
976,183
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
897,247
|
|
901,585
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
1,365,210
|
|
$
|
1,877,768
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
5
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. |
Basis
of Presentation
|
The
consolidated financial statements for the three and six month periods ended
June
30, 2006 and 2005 have been prepared by us without audit pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, and for
the
periods then ended, have been made. Those adjustments consist of normal and
recurring adjustments. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005,
has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet as of that
date.
Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in our annual financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with a reading of the financial statements and notes
thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.
The
results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006,
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full
year.
2. |
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
Cash
paid
for interest for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, was $296 and
$1,906, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the
Company had non-cash transactions related to share based payments covered by
FAS
123R. These transactions are described in greater detail in Note 4. During
the
six months ended June 30, 2006 we also had a non-cash transaction related to
the
issuance of shares in connection with the acquisition of patent as described
in
greater detail in Note 3.
3. |
Stockholders’
Equity
|
During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, we issued 750,000 restricted shares of
common stock and received net proceeds of $1,500,000 in an exempt offering
under
Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933. In the six months ended June 30,
2005, we issued 1,200,000 restricted shares of common stock and received net
proceeds of $3,000,000 in an exempt offering under Regulation D of the
Securities Act of 1933, and we also issued 717,625 shares of our common stock
and received $477,938 in connection with the exercise of employee stock options,
primarily by former employees.
In
June
2006, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock valued at $400,000 to acquire
the remaining interest in a patent that had been assigned to us. This patent
was
part of the intellectual property that we sold during the six months ended
June
30, 2006. This transaction is described in greater detail in Note
5.
4. |
Share-Based
Payments
|
Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which requires that
the
compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized
in
financial statements based on the provisions of SFAS 123 issued in 1995. We
have
adopted this statement using the modified retrospective method of
implementation, whereby the 2005 statements included have been restated to
give
effect to the fair-value based method of accounting for awards granted,
modified, or settled in that year as though they had been accounted for under
FAS 123.
The
Company recorded $787,866 in compensation expense in the six months ended June
30, 2006 related to options issued under its stock-based incentive compensation
plans. This includes expense related to both options issued in the current
year
and options issued in prior years for which the requisite service period for
those options includes the current year. The fair value of these options was
calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Information related
to
the assumptions used in this model is set forth in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. For options issued
in
2006, the same assumptions were used except that risk free interest rates of
4.64% to 5.0% were used and annualized volatility rates ranging from
approximately 70% to 85% were used.
6
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
4. |
Share-Based
Payments (cont.)
|
The
Company recorded $351,194 in compensation expense in the period ended June
30,
2005 related to options issued under its stock-based incentive compensation
plans. A portion of this expense, $19,339, related to options issued to
contractors and was recorded in the financial statements at the time. The
remaining expense, $331,855, related to employee options and was originally
accounted for using the intrinsic value method, which resulted in no expense.
The 2005 statements have been restated to account for these options as if they
had been accounted for under FAS 123. The Company also increased both additional
paid in capital and the accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2005 by
$10,273,105 to reflect the cumulative effect of the implementation of FAS 123R
as of that date. This amount represents the total share-based compensation
expense that would have been recorded for the period from 1995 through 2005
if
the company had accounted for share based awards under FAS 123.
5. |
Gain
on Sale of Intellectual Property and Other
Assets
|
In
June
2006, our Electronic Billboard Technology, Inc. subsidiary sold all of its
intellectual property in two simultaneous transactions. We received a total
of
$1.5 million in cash, the right to future royalties, and an ownership interest
in a newly formed entity. One of the patents that we sold was a patent that
had
been assigned to us by Advanced Technology, Incubator, Inc. (“ATI”), a company
owned by Dr. Zvi Yaniv, our Chief Operating Officer. In order to acquire the
remaining interest in the patent and settle all potential future obligations
to
ATI, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock, valued at $400,000 to ATI.
The gain of $1.1 million recorded in the financial statements resulted from
the
cash payment received of $1.5 million, less the $400,000 cost associated with
the acquisition of the patent rights.
6. |
Contingencies
|
Litigation
The
Company is a defendant in minor lawsuits described in greater detail in its
2005
Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company expects any potential eventual payment
to have no material affect on the financial statements.
In
April
2005, we filed suit against the Japanese camera and copier manufacturer Canon,
Inc., and its wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary Canon USA, Inc.,
in the
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, seeking
a declaratory judgment that new SED color television products
being developed and manufactured by a Canon/Toshiba joint venture are not
covered under a non-exclusive 1999 patent license agreement that we granted
to Canon. We assert that the Canon/Toshiba joint-venture - SED,
Inc. - is not a licensed party under that agreement. The original complaint
asserted additional claims related to whether the Canon/Toshiba joint venture’s
television panels constituted excluded products under the 1999 license, as
well
as breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference
and
a Lanham act violation by Canon. Last year, Canon moved to dismiss Canon U.S.A.
from the litigation, and moved to dismiss several of the counts asserted. The
court denied the motion, in part, by ruling that Canon U.S.A. was an appropriate
defendant and refusing to dismiss our claims for breach of the covenant of
good
faith and fair dealing. Our tortious interference and Lanham Act claims were
dismissed, without prejudice.
After
initial discovery, in April 2006, we amended the complaint to drop one count
related to the definition of excluded products in the 1999 license, and add
two
counts for fraudulent inducement and fraudulent non-disclosure related to events
and representations made during our negotiations on the license. Canon moved
to
dismiss the fraud claims, and the Court denied Canon’s motion in May 2006. The
suit is now proceeding under the amended complaint and a trial date has been
set
for March 2007.
7
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
6. |
Contingencies
(cont.)
|
In
May
2006, we filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois against Till Keesmann, a German citizen who in 2000 granted us an
exclusive and perpetual license to certain of his U.S. and European patents
in
carbon nanotube cathode technology. Last year, Keesmann conveyed part of his
interests in the Exclusive License to investors associated with a German patent
evaluation firm, IP Bewertungs AG (“IPB”). Thereafter, IPB approached us with
proposals to buy or auction our rights to Keesmann’s patents. On March 20, 2006,
we announced a letter of intent to form a joint venture with a leading Asian
display manufacturer, Da Ling Co., Ltd., to develop display products utilizing
our intellectual property. Two days later, Keesmann purported to terminate
the
exclusive license that he granted to us six years ago. Our May 2006 complaint
seeks a declaratory judgement that Keesmann had no right to terminate the
exclusive license, and we also filed for a Temporary Restraining Order and
Preliminary Injunction to prevent Keesmann from taking any actions inconsistent
with his obligations under the exclusive license. The Court granted a consent
order that prevents Keesmann from licensing the patents pending a preliminary
injunction hearing and decision. The matter is proceeding on an expedited basis,
and arguments related to the preliminary injunction are expected to be heard
in
September or October, 2006. In June 2006, Keesman filed an Answer and
Counterclaim, denying that the purported termination was null and void, and
asserting a counterclaim that asks the court to find that we breached the
exclusive license by not actively marketing the Keesmann patents, among other
things.
7. |
Business
Segments
|
Following
is information related to our business segments for the six months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005:
|
ANI
|
EBT
|
All
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
277,193
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
277,193
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Profit
(Loss)
|
(3,233,473
|
)
|
973,019
|
(919,295
|
)
|
(3,179,749
|
)
|
||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Expenditures
for
|
|||||||||||||
long-lived
assets
|
17,629
|
-
|
-
|
17,629
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
2005
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
157,359
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
157,359
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Profit
(Loss)
|
(2,236,508
|
)
|
-
|
(504,895
|
)
|
(2,741,403
|
)
|
||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Expenditures
for
|
|||||||||||||
long-lived
assets
|
5,232
|
-
|
1,282
|
6,514
|
8. |
Subsequent
Events
|
There
have been no subsequent events requiring disclosure through July 28,
2006.
8
ITEM 2: |
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The
following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors
that have affected our financial position and operating results during the
periods included in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
Form
10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements that we believe are within
the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe
harbors created by such acts. For this purpose, any statements that are not
statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements,
including the statements under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" regarding our strategy, future
operations, future expectations or future estimates, financial position and
objectives of management. Those statements in this Form 10-Q containing the
words "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects" and similar expressions
constitute forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking
statements contain such identifying words. These forward-looking statements
are
based on our current expectations and are subject to a number of risks,
uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations,
competitive factors, shifts in market demand and other risks and
uncertainties.
Although
we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are
reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and actual results may
differ from those indicated by the forward-looking statements included in this
Form 10-Q. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q, you should not consider
the inclusion of such information as a representation by us or anyone else
that
we will achieve such results. Moreover, we assume no obligation to update these
forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions
or
changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.
Six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
OVERVIEW
During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, our primary revenues were earned as a result
of reimbursed research expenditures at our Applied Nanotech, Inc. (“ANI”)
subsidiary. We continued to incur substantial expenses in support of the
development of our proprietary Carbon Nanotube Based Field Emission (“CFE”)
Technology and other technologies. As more fully discussed in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, we expect to incur additional
research and development expenses throughout 2006 in developing our technology.
We are focused on licensing our technology and obtaining sufficient revenue
to
cover our ongoing research expenditures.
OUTLOOK
We
expect
our present cash balance, which is in excess of $1.3 million as of June 30,
2006, when combined with expected revenue sources, to enable us to operate
at
least through 2006. We also have a plan to achieve breakeven, excluding non-cash
expenses related to stock based compensation, in 2006. There can be no assurance
that we will achieve break-even in the current year. To the extent our revenues
do not allow us to break-even, or if the timing of revenues does not match
with
expenses, we could be required to raise additional funds through the issuance
of
debt or equity securities to enable us to maintain operations at the present
level. The mix of revenues received could also cause the revenues required
to
reach break-even to increase. If revenue producing projects require
unanticipated expenses, or heavier than anticipated use of outside services
or
materials, we may be unable to achieve break-even at the expected level of
revenues. We have also encountered unanticipated delays in the start of certain
revenue producing projects and incurred significant unanticipated expenses
in
connection with litigation in 2006. The combination of these factors will make
it more difficult to achieve our plan for break-even.
We
have
developed a plan to allow ourselves to maintain operations until we are able
to
sustain ourselves on our own revenue. Our plan is primarily dependent on raising
funds through the licensing of our technology and reimbursed research contracts.
Our cash balance, which was in excess of $1.3 million as of June 30, 2006,
when
combined with expected revenue sources, is sufficient to allow us to maintain
operations through at least the end of the year. We expect additional revenue
producing projects or license agreements to be finalized during that time
period. We believe that we have the ability to continue to raise additional
funding, if necessary, to enable us to continue operations until our plan can
be
completed.
9
ITEM 2: |
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS (cont.)
|
This
plan
is based on current development plans, current operating plans, the current
regulatory environment, historical experience in the development of electronic
products and general economic conditions. Changes could occur which would cause
certain assumptions on which this plan is based to be no longer valid. Although
we do not expect funding our operations to be a problem, if adequate funds
are
not available from operations, or additional sources of financing, we may have
to eliminate, or reduce substantially, expenditures for research and
development, testing and production of its products, or obtain funds through
arrangements with other entities that may require us to relinquish rights to
certain of our technologies or products. Such results would materially and
adversely affect us.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
In
March
2006, we signed a letter of intent to enter into negotiations to form a joint
venture dedicated to constructing and operating a pilot line for carbon nanotube
televisions with Da Ling Co., Ltd., a corporation based in Taiwan. Da Ling
would
be responsible for managing and funding the joint venture which includes
securing the equipment and location, staffing the facility, and paying all
operating costs. If the joint venture is formed, we will provide our expertise
related to the application and implementation of the CNT technology and will
also receive $1 million for providing our knowledge and know-how. We expect
a
decision on whether the joint venture will be formed to be reached during the
third quarter of 2006.
In
June
2006, we received formal notification of the award of a Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II contract from the U.S. Air Force in the
amount of approximately $750,000 to further develop our carbon monoxide sensor
technology. Work on the program, which is expected to last approximately two
years, began immediately. Also participating with us on this contract as
subcontractors are Boeing Corporation and Goodrich Corporation.
In
June
2006, we sold the intellectual property of our Electronic Billboard Technology,
Inc. subsidiary to Novus Communications Technologies, Inc. in two simultaneous
transactions. We received a total of $1.5 in cash, an ownership interest in
a
newly formed entity, and the right to future royalties. The royalties are based
on a percent of the revenues earned from a package of patents owned by Novus
Partners, LLC, a subsidiary of Novus Communications. The package includes the
patents related to digital advertising acquired from EBT.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment ("SFAS No. 123R"), which required
that
the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized
in financial statements based on the provisions of SFAS 123 issued in 1995.
We
adopted FAS 123R effective January 1, 2006. We previously accounted for
stock-based compensation using APB 25 and disclosed pro forma compensation
expense annually by calculating the stock option grants' fair value using the
Black-Scholes model and disclosing the impact on net income and earnings (loss)
per share in a Note to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Pro forma
presentation is no longer an alternative and accordingly we began recording
the
fair value of options as compensation expense in the current period. As
described in the notes to the financial statements, implementation of FAS 123R
had a significant impact on our financial statements in the current period
and
likely will continue to have a significant impact in future
periods.
10
ITEM 2: |
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS (cont.)
|
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Our
cash
position increased during the period. At June 30, 2006 we had cash and cash
equivalents in the amount of $1,365,210 as compared with cash and cash
equivalents of $897,247 at December 31, 2005. This increase in cash is primarily
the result of cash provided by financing activities, offset by cash used in
operating activities.
As
described in greater detail in the notes to the financial statements, we
received net proceeds of $1,500,000 from the issuance of common stock related
to
private placements during the six months ended June 30, 2006 (the “2006
Period”), as compared with $3,477,938 from the issuance of common stock during
the six months ended June 30, 2005 (the “2005 Period”). The majority of the
common stock issued in the 2005 Period was the result of the private placement
in February 2005 in which 1,200,000 shares of stock were issued in exchange
for
net proceeds of $3,000,000. The remaining amount in 2005 came from the exercise
of employee stock options. We may raise additional equity in 2006 if planned
revenues are delayed from the dates projected. We may receive additional
proceeds from common stock as the result of the exercise of options in
2006.
Our
cash
used in operating activities decreased from $2,484,813 in the 2005 Period to
$1,010,060 in the 2006 Period. This is primarily the result of operating factors
discussed below in the “Results of Operations” section, as well as the working
capital provided by increased balances in accounts payable. A significant factor
in the increased balance in accounts payable as of June 30, 2006 is the payment
arrangement that we have with our attorneys related to the Keesman litigation.
This is discussed in more detail below in the “Results of Operations” section.
We would expect our cash used in operating activities to decrease in future
quarters in 2006 as a result of increasing revenues, while expenses remain
relatively constant.
Cash
used
in investing activities in both periods was insignificant and we expect cash
used in investing activities to remain at relatively insignificant levels for
the balance of 2006.
The
principal source of our liquidity has been funds received from exempt offerings
of common stock. In the event that we need additional funds, we may seek to
sell
additional debt or equity securities. While we expect to be able to obtain
any
funds needed for operations, there can be no assurance that any of these
financing alternatives can be arranged on commercially acceptable terms. We
believe that our success in reaching profitability will be dependent on our
patent portfolio and upon the viability of products using our technology and
their acceptance in the marketplace, as well as our ability to obtain additional
debt or equity financings in the future, if needed.
We
expect
to continue to incur substantial expenses for research and development
("R&D"). Further, we believe that certain products that may be developed by
potential licensees of our technology may not be available for commercial sale
or routine use for a period of one to two years. Others are expected to be
available in 2006. While we would likely receive initial license payments,
ongoing royalty streams related to those licenses will not be available until
potential licensees have introduced products using our technology. Therefore,
it
is possible that the commercialization of our existing and proposed products
may
require additional capital in excess of our current funding. We do, however,
have a plan to operate profitably in 2006 based on the receipt of research
funding and other revenues. Achievement of at least break-even would enable
us
to continue our research without seeking additional debt or equity
financing.
Because
the timing and receipt of revenues from the license or royalty agreements will
be tied to the achievement of certain product development, testing and marketing
objectives, which cannot be predicted with certainty, there may be substantial
fluctuations in our results of operations. If revenues do not increase as
rapidly as anticipated, or if product development and testing require more
funding than anticipated, we may be required to curtail our operations or seek
additional financing from other sources. The combined effect of the foregoing
may prevent us from achieving sustained profitability for an extended period
of
time.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Our
net
loss for the second quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $1,385,583 as compared
with
the loss of $1,376,209 for the same period last year. Our net loss of $3,179,749
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was higher than the loss of $2,741,403
for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increased loss was the result
of
reasons set forth below. We expect our quarterly loss to be reduced in the
third
and fourth quarters of 2006.
11
ITEM 2: |
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS (cont.)
|
Our
revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 totaled $115,009 compared to
$88,544 for the same quarter of 2005. For the six-month period ended June 30,
2006 (the “2006 Period”), our revenues were $277,193 as compared with $157,359
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 (the “2005 Period”). The revenues
in both periods were all from ANI and substantially all the result of reimbursed
research expenditures. The majority of revenues in the 2005 Period came from
government contracts, whereas the majority of revenues in the 2006 Period came
from private sources. At the present stage of our development, significant
conclusions can’t be drawn from comparing revenues from period to period. Our
business strategy is built on developing a royalty stream from licensing our
intellectual property. To supplement this, we also seek funding from both
governmental and private sources to help fund our research. Until we are able
to
develop a steady revenue stream from royalties, our revenues will tend to
fluctuate greatly from quarter to quarter and may not be a significant source
of
operating cash for us. Our private research funding tends to come in large
amounts at sporadic times.
We
have a
revenue backlog of approximately $2.9 million as of the date of this filing
and
we expect our revenue to increase significantly in future quarters as a result
of this backlog. We had a total revenue backlog of approximately $370,000 as
of
June 30, 2005. Our ability to perform continued research, or fulfill our
backlog, should not require significant additional personnel. We do not
anticipate hiring any additional people for the balance of the
year.
We
incurred research and development expenses of $1,654,309 in the 2006 Period,
which was higher than the amount of $1,310,598 incurred in the 2005 Period.
This
reflects a general increase in the level of our activity. The majority of our
research and development expenditures are relatively fixed, and include salaries
and related cost, facilities costs, etc. The variable portion relates to
spending on outside materials and consultants and was relatively similar from
year to year. We expect research and development expenditures to continue to
gradually increase for the remainder of the year as new projects begin.
Significant new revenue producing research programs beyond those already
identified could, however, cause research and development expenditures to
increase further.
Our
selling, general, and administrative expenses were $2,907,884 for the 2006
Period, compared with $1,601,807 for the 2005 Period - an increase of
approximately $1.3 million. Of this increase, approximately $400,000 related
to
a non-cash item resulting from the implementation of issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
("SFAS No. 123R") . The balance of the increase related to professional fees,
primarily related to litigation. We have incurred roughly $700,000 of expenses
related to litigation in the first six months of 2006, roughly $500,000 of
which
relates to the Keesmann lawsuit. We have a modified fee arrangement with our
attorneys related to the Keesmann litigation, whereby the fees are not payable
until the earlier of eighteen months, or coincident with certain revenue
producing events. The level of selling, general, and administrative expenses
is
expected to remain relatively constant for the remainder of the
year.
We
had a
gain of $1.1 million in the 2006 Period as a result of the sale of the
intellectual property of our Electronic Billboard Technology, Inc. subsidiary.
We received total cash proceeds of $1.5 million in the transaction, but that
was
partially offset by $400,000 of costs related to a portion of the intellectual
property sold. One of the patents sold by EBT was assigned to us by Advanced
Technology Incubator, Inc, a Company owned by our Chief Operating Officer,
Dr.
Zvi Yaniv. In order to acquire the remaining interest in the patent and settle
all potential future obligations to ATI, we issued 200,000 shares of our common
stock, valued at $400,000 to ATI.
Our
interest expense and interest income remained substantially the same in the
two
periods. Our only remaining interest expense relates to capital leases. Our
interest income is a result of the investment of excess funds in short term
interest bearing instruments, primarily certificates of deposit, commercial
paper, and money market funds. We expect both to remain relatively insignificant
in the foreseable future.
12
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE
AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
We
do not
use any derivative financial instruments for hedging, speculative, or trading
purposes. Our exposure to market risk is currently immaterial.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS
AND
PROCEDURES
Under
the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this
report (the "Evaluation Date"). Based upon this evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the Evaluation
Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the
material information required to the included in our Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to the
Company, including, our consolidated subsidiaries, and was made known to them
by
others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report
was being prepared.
In
addition, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in
other
factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the
Evaluation Date. We have not identified any significant deficiencies or material
weaknesses in our internal controls, and therefore, there were no corrective
actions taken.
13
PART
II.
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In
April
2005, we filed suit against the Japanese camera and copier manufacturer Canon,
Inc., and its wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary Canon USA, Inc., in
the
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, seeking
a declaratory judgment that new SED color television products
being developed and manufactured by a Canon/Toshiba joint venture are not
covered under a non-exclusive 1999 patent license agreement that we granted
to Canon. We assert that the Canon/Toshiba joint-venture - SED,
Inc. - is not a licensed party under that agreement. The original complaint
asserted additional claims related to whether the Canon/Toshiba joint venture’s
television panels constituted excluded products under the 1999 license, as
well
as breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference and
a Lanham act violation by Canon. Last year, Canon moved to dismiss Canon U.S.A.
from the litigation, and moved to dismiss several of the counts asserted. The
court denied the motion, in part, by ruling that Canon U.S.A. was an appropriate
defendant and refusing to dismiss our claims for breach of the covenant of
good
faith and fair dealing. Our tortious interference and Lanham Act claims were
dismissed, without prejudice.
After
initial discovery, in April 2006, we amended the complaint to drop one count
related to the definition of excluded products in the 1999 license, and add
two
counts for fraudulent inducement and fraudulent non-disclosure related to events
and representations made during our negotiations on the license. Canon moved
to
dismiss the fraud claims, and the Court denied Canon’s motion in May 2006. The
suit is now proceeding under the amended complaint and a trial date has been
set
for March 2007.
In
May
2006, we filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois against Till Keesmann, a German citizen who in 2000 granted us an
exclusive and perpetual license to certain of his U.S. and European patents
in
carbon nanotube cathode technology. Last year, Keesmann conveyed part of his
interests in the Exclusive License to investors associated with a German patent
evaluation firm, IP Bewertungs AG (“IPB”). Thereafter, IPB approached us with
proposals to buy or auction our rights to Keesmann’s patents. On March 20, 2006,
we announced a letter of intent to form a joint venture with a leading Asian
display manufacturer, Da Ling Co., Ltd., to develop display products utilizing
our intellectual property. Two days later, Keesmann purported to terminate
the
exclusive license that he granted to us six years ago. Our May 2006 complaint
seeks a declaratory judgement that Keesmann had no right to terminate the
exclusive license, and we also filed for a Temporary Restraining Order and
Preliminary Injunction to prevent Keesmann from taking any actions inconsistent
with his obligations under the exclusive license. The Court granted a consent
order that prevents Keesmann from licensing the patents pending a preliminary
injunction hearing and decision. The matter is proceeding on an expedited basis,
and arguments related to the preliminary injunction are expected to be heard
in
September or October, 2006. In June 2006, Keesman filed an Answer and
Counterclaim, denying that the purported termination was null and void, and
asserting a counterclaim that asks the court to find that we breached the
exclusive license by not actively marketing the Keesmann patents, among other
things.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
AND USE OF PROCEEDS
From
April 1, 2006 through June 30, 2006, we issued 200,000 shares to Advanced
Technology Incubator, Inc., a company owned by our Chief Operating Officer,
Dr.
Zvi Yaniv in exchange for the remaining rights in a patent previously assigned
to us by ATI. We filed a registration statement in June 2006 to register these
shares, as well as other previously issued shares.
14
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits:
See Index to Exhibits on page 17 for a descriptive response to this
item.
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
|
NANO-PROPRIETARY,
INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
Date: July
28, 2006
|
/s/
R.D.
Burck
R.D.
Burck
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
Date: July
28, 2006
|
/s/
Douglas P.
Baker
Douglas
P. Baker
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting
Officer)
|
16
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
The
following documents are filed as part of this Report:
Exhibit
|
|
11
|
Computation
of (Loss) Per Common Share
|
|
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of R.D. Burck
|
|
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Douglas P. Baker
|
|
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certificate of R.D. Burck
|
|
|
32.2
|
Section
1350 Certificate of Douglas P.
Baker
|
17