Annual Statements Open main menu

Nano Magic Inc. - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)

nnpp_10q-033108.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
ý  Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
        For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
 
¨   Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-11602
 
NANO-PROPRIETARY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 

 
TEXAS
76-0273345
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
 
   

 
3006 Longhorn Blvd., Suite 107
 
Austin, Texas
78758
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

 
(512) 339-5020
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
 
               Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
 
 
[X]
  Yes
 
[  ]
  No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in rule 12b-2 of the Act.
 
Large Accelerated Filer  o    Accelerated Filer  þ   
 
Non-accelerated Filer  o     Smaller Reporting Company  o

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
 
 
[  ]
  Yes
 
[X]
  No
 
As of April 25, 2008, the registrant had 107,173,549 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share, issued and outstanding.

 
 

 


 
NANO-PROPRIETARY, INC.
INDEX
 

 
Part I.  Financial Information
Page
       
 
Item 1.  Financial Statements
 
       
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets--March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
3
       
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations--Three Months Ended
          March 31, 2008 and 2007
 
4
       
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows--Three Months Ended
          March 31, 2008 and 2007
 
5
       
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
       
 
Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
                     and Results of Operations
 
9
       
 
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
13
       
  Item 4. Controls and Procedures
13
       
Part II.  Other Information
 
       
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
14
       
 
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
15
     
 
Item 6.  Exhibits
15
       
Signatures
16

 

 
 

 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
NANO-PROPRIETARY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
ASSETS
 
(Unaudited)
March 31,
2008
   
December 31,
2007
 
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 2,528,839     $ 3,020,096  
Accounts receivable, trade – net of allowance for doubtful accounts
    342,245       253,963  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    57,099       77,038  
                 
                Total current assets
    2,928,183       3,351,097  
                 
Property and equipment, net
    268,802       278,456  
Other assets
    118,269       115,305  
                Total assets
  $ 3,315,254     $ 3,744,858  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
                 
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 721,531     $ 447,106  
Obligations under capital lease
    30,248       29,416  
Accrued liabilities
    103,458       103,003  
Deferred Revenue
    269,153       306,427  
                 
                Total current liabilities
    1,124,390       885,952  
                 
Obligations under capital lease, long-term
    22,123       30,004  
                 
Total Liabilities
    1,146,513       915,956  
Commitments and contingencies
           
                 
Stockholders' (deficit):
               
     Convertible preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized;
            No shares issued and outstanding
           
     Common stock, $.00l par value, 120,000,000 shares authorized,
            107,173,549 shares issued and outstanding at
            March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
    107,174       107,174  
Additional paid-in capital
    108,667,983       108,580,565  
Accumulated deficit
    (106,606,416 )     (105,858,837 )
                 
                Total stockholders' equity
    2,168,741       2,828,902  
                 
                Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
  $ 3,315,254     $ 3,744,858  

 
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
3

 
NANO-PROPRIETARY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
 
   
For  the Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Revenues
           
Government contracts
  $ 545,824     $ 517,416  
Contract Research
    184,358       302,211  
Other
    139,832       137,240  
          Total Revenues
    870,014       956,867  
                 
Research and Development
    1,182,135       1,075,501  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    1,055,270       1,238,683  
                 
Operating costs and expenses
    2,237,405       2,314,184  
                 
Gain on sale of intellectual property and other assets
    100,000        
                 
Loss from operations
    (1,267,391 )     (1,357,317 )
                 
Other income (expense), net
               
Interest Expense
    (1,598 )     (269 )
Interest Income
    21,410       11,699  
Litigation Settlement
    500,000        
                 
 Loss from continuing operations before taxes
    (747,579 )     (1,345,887 )
                 
 Provision for taxes
           
                 
Net loss
  $ (747,579 )   $ (1,345,887 )
Loss per share
               
                 
Basic and Diluted 
  $ (0.01 )   $ (0.01 )
Weighted average shares outstanding
               
                 
Basic and Diluted 
    107,173,549       104,289,473  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
 
 
4

 
NANO-PROPRIETARY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
2008
   
2007
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
 Net loss
  $ (747,579 )   $ (1,345,887 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
               
cash used in operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization expense
    16,049       11,327  
Stock based compensation expense
    87,418       189,868  
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable, trade
    (88,282 )     (194,437 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    16,975       (63,031 )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    274,880       405,702  
Deposits and Deferred Revenue
    (37,274 )     222,264  
                 
Total adjustments
    269,766       571,693  
                 
Net cash used in operating activities
    (477,813 )     (774,194 )
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (6,395 )     (42,710 )
       Net cash used in investing activities
    (6,395 )     (42,710 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Repayment of notes payable and capital lease obligations
    (7,049 )      
Proceeds of stock issuance, net of costs
          107,253  
                 
       Net cash provided by (used by) financing activities
    (7,049 )     107,253  
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (491,257 )     (709,651 )
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    3,020,096       2,085,338  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 2,528,839     $ 1,375,687  

 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
 
5

 
NANO-PROPRIETARY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
 

 
1.       Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements of the Company for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, have been prepared by the Company without audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company as of March 31, 2008 and 2007, and for the periods then ended, have been made. Those adjustments consist of normal and recurring adjustments. The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2007, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date.
 
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with a reading of the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
The results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
 
2.       Supplemental Cash Flow Information
 
Cash paid for interest for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, was $1,598 and $269, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had non-cash transactions related to share based payments covered by FAS 123R. These transactions are described in greater detail in Note 4.
 
3.       Stockholders’ Equity
 
                 The Company issued no shares of stock during the three months ended March 31, 2008. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company issued 135,687 shares of its common stock and received $107,253 in connection with the exercise of stock options.
 
4.           Share-Based Payments
 
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements based on the provisions of SFAS 123 issued in 1995.
 
The Company recorded $76,968 in compensation expense in the period ended March 31, 2008, related to options issued under its stock-based incentive compensation plans. This includes expense related to both options issued in the current year and options issued in prior years for which the requisite service period for those options includes the current year. The fair value of these options was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Information related to the assumptions used in this model is set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. For options issued in 2008, the same assumptions were used except that risk free interest rates ranging from 1.80% to 3.13% were used and an annualized volatility rate of approximately 75% was used. The period ended March 31, 2008 also includes $10,450 of expense related to restricted stock provided to non-employee Directors of the Company as compensation.
 
The Company recorded $189,868 in compensation expense in the period ended March 31, 2007, related to options issued under its stock-based incentive compensation plans.
 
 

 
6

 


 
NANO-PROPRIETARY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
 

 
5.       Contingencies
 
Litigation
 
The Company is a defendant in minor lawsuits described in greater detail in its 2007 annual report on Form 10-K. The Company expects any potential eventual payment to have no material affect on the financial statements.
 
Canon litigation
 
In April 2005, we filed suit against the Japanese camera and copier manufacturer Canon, Inc., and its wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary Canon USA, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, seeking a declaratory judgment that new SED color television products being developed and manufactured by a Canon/Toshiba joint venture are not covered under a non-exclusive 1999 patent license agreement that we granted to Canon.  We asserted that the Canon/Toshiba joint-venture – SED, Inc. – was not a licensed party under that agreement.  The original complaint asserted additional claims related to whether the Canon/Toshiba joint venture’s television panels constituted excluded products under the 1999 license, as well as breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference and a Lanham Act violation by Canon. In the fall of 2005, Canon moved to dismiss Canon U.S.A. from the litigation, and moved to dismiss several of the counts asserted.  The court denied the motion, in part, by ruling that Canon U.S.A. was an appropriate defendant and refusing to dismiss our claims for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.  Our tortious interference and Lanham Act claims were dismissed, without prejudice.
 
After initial discovery, in April 2006, we amended the complaint to drop one count related to the definition of excluded products in the 1999 license, and add two counts for fraudulent inducement and fraudulent non-disclosure related to events and representations made during our negotiations on the license,  and leading up to and following the formation by Canon and Toshiba of their joint venture effort, including Canon’s failure to disclose an ongoing relationship with Toshiba and misrepresentations made to us about the joint venture’s structure and operation.  Canon moved to dismiss the fraud claims, and the Court denied Canon’s motion in May 2006.  Discovery was completed in August 2006. Upon completion of discovery, Canon filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking to dismiss the claim that SED is not a licensed party under the agreement. Canon did not file a motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss the other claims. In November 2006, the Court denied Canon’s partial motion for summary judgment, describing SED, Inc. as a “corporate fiction designed for the sole purpose of evading Canon’s contractual obligations”.
 
In January 2007, Canon filed another motion for partial summary judgment seeking a declaration that a reconstituted SED, Inc. which is purportedly owned 100% by Canon but which still involved numerous reciprocal agreements with Toshiba, would be considered a Canon subsidiary. At the same time, we filed a motion for partial summary judgment, seeking the Court’s affirmation of our termination of the license agreement due to Canon’s breach of contract in 2004. On February 22, 2007, the Court issued a ruling denying Canon’s motion and granting our motion for partial summary judgment, ruling our termination of the contract effective December 1, 2006 to be valid.
 
A trial on the case began on April 30, 2007 and a final judgment was entered in the case in May 2007. The final judgment reaffirmed Canon’s material breach of the patent license, while awarding no additional damages. Both parties have filed appeals related to the litigation. All appeal briefs and responses have been filed with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and oral arguments in the case have been tentatively scheduled for the week of June 2, 2008.
 
Keesmann litigation
 
In May 2006 we filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against Till Keesmann, a German citizen who in 2000 granted us an exclusive and perpetual license to certain of his U.S. and European patents in carbon nanotube cathode technology.   The complaint, which resulted from Keesmann’s attempted termination of the license in March 2006, seeks a declaratory judgment that Keesmann had no right to terminate the exclusive license. We also filed for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction to prevent Keesmann from taking any actions inconsistent with his obligations under the exclusive license.
 

 
7

 

NANO-PROPRIETARY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
 
5.       Contingencies (continued)
 
In June 2006, Keesmann filed an Answer and Counterclaim, denying that the purported termination was null and void, and asserting a counterclaim that asks the court to find that we breached the exclusive license by not actively marketing the Keesmann patents, among other things.  The Court granted a consent order that prevents Keesmann from licensing the patents pending an injunction hearing and decision.
 
In January 2007, the Court granted our motion for preliminary injunction, ruling that there is a reasonable likelihood that we will prevail on the merits of the case. The preliminary injunction enjoins Keesmann, his agents, employees, and all those acting in concert with him from terminating the license agreement for the reasons asserted in the March 2006 default notice, or otherwise acting in violation of the license agreement. In connection with this injunction, the Court set a surety bond, which is required by law, at $100,000. We posted the bond in February 2007.  Days after the Court issued the injunction, Keesmann again asserted a number of alleged defaults under the license. In April 2007, we filed a second motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. This second motion was withdrawn, without prejudice in March 2008.
 
In 2005, Keesmann conveyed part of his interests in the Exclusive License to investors associated with a German patent evaluation firm, IP Bewertungs AG (“IPB”).  In December 2006, we amended our original complaint to add these investors as additional defendants. The amended complaint also contains additional claims including breach of contract, conversion, aiding and abetting conversion, conspiracy to commit conversion, misappropriation, aiding and abetting misappropriation, conspiracy to commit conversion, Lanham Act violations, tortious interference with a prospective economic relationship, aiding and abetting tortious interference with a prospective economic relationship, and conspiracy to tortiously interfere with a prospective economic relationship. We completed a settlement agreement with these additional defendants in February 2008. As a result of this settlement agreement, we received a payment of $500,000 in exchange for dropping all claims against these defendants. Mr. Keesmann did not participate in this settlement and the litigation against Mr. Keesmann continues. No trial date has been set for this matter.
 
6.       Business Segments
 
Following is information related to the Company’s business segments for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:
 
   
ANI
   
EBT
   
All Other
   
Total
 
2008
                       
                         
Revenue
  $ 870,014     $ -     $ -     $ 870,014  
                                 
Profit (Loss)
    (440,541 )     (520     (306,518 )     (747,579 )
                                 
Expenditures for
                               
     long-lived assets
    6,395       -       -       6,395  
                                 
2007
                               
                                 
Revenue
  $ 956,867     $ -     $ -     $ 956,867  
                                 
Profit (Loss)
    (956,574 )     (1,298     (388,015 )     (1,345,887 )
                                 
Expenditures for
                               
     long-lived assets
    42,710       -       -       42,710  


 
8

 

ITEM 2:  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the Company’s financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
          This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements that we believe are within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by such acts. For this purpose, any statements that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements, including the statements under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" regarding our strategy, future operations, future expectations or future estimates, financial position and objectives of management. Those statements in this Form 10-Q containing the words "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects" and similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, competitive factors, shifts in market demand and other risks and uncertainties.
 
          Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and actual results may differ from those indicated by the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q.  In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q, you should not consider the inclusion of such information as a representation by us or anyone else that we will achieve such results. Moreover, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.
 
Three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
 
OVERVIEW
 
          We are primarily a nanotechnology company engaged in the performance of services and development of technologies based principally on our intellectual property. During all periods presented, our primary revenues were earned as a result of reimbursed research expenditures at our Applied Nanotech, Inc. (“ANI”) subsidiary. As more fully discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, we expect to incur additional research and development expenses throughout 2008 in developing our technology. We are focused on licensing our technology and obtaining sufficient revenue to cover our ongoing research expenditures.
 
OUTLOOK
 
          We expect our present cash balances, which are approximately $2 million as of the date of this filing, when combined with expected revenue sources, to enable us to operate at least through the end of 2008.  We have a plan to achieve profitability in 2008. There can be no assurance that we will achieve profitability, or even break-even, or that expected revenue sources will all occur as planned. The mix of revenues received could also cause the revenues required to reach break-even to increase. If revenue producing projects require unanticipated expenses, or heavier than anticipated use of outside services or materials, we may be unable to achieve profitability at the expected level of revenues.
 
          We have developed a plan to allow ourselves to maintain operations until we are able to sustain ourselves on our own revenue. Our plan is primarily dependent on raising funds through the licensing of our technology and reimbursed research contracts. Our current cash, which is approximately $2.0 million as of the date of this filing, when combined with expected revenues, is sufficient to allow us to maintain operations at least through the end of 2008. We expect additional revenue producing projects or license agreements to be finalized during 2008. We believe that we have the ability to continue to raise funding, if necessary, to enable us to continue operations until our plan can be completed.
 

 
9

 

ITEM 2:  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont.)
 
 
This plan is based on current development plans, current operating plans, the current regulatory environment, historical experience in the development of electronic products and general economic conditions. Changes could occur which would cause certain assumptions on which this plan is based to be no longer valid. Although we do not expect funding our operations to be a problem, if adequate funds are not available from operations, or additional sources of financing, we may have to eliminate, or reduce substantially, expenditures for research and development, testing and production of its products, or obtain funds through arrangements with other entities that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our technologies or products. Such results would materially and adversely affect us.
 
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
 
In February 2008, we entered into a partial settlement of the Keesmann litigation, which is described in more detail in Part II, Item 1 of this report. As part of this settlement, we received a payment of $500,000. The settlement also has the effect of simplifying the remaining issues in the case and should reduce both the cost of, and time to, ultimate resolution of the entire case.
 
During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we extended the life on warrants due to expire on April 23, 2008. These warrants were originally issued in connection with the private placement of our common stock completed in April 2007. As part of that private placement, we issued a total of 1,304,353 warrants, each enabling the holder purchase a share of our common stock at a price of $2.50 per share. The expiration date of these warrants was extended to December 31, 2008.
 
In February 2008, we received a notice of allowance from the U.S. Patent Office related to our patent application titled “Nanobiosensor and carbon nanotube thin film transistor.” This patent is one of the basic patents that covers a wide variety  of biosensor applications and combines a sensing element with a thin film transistor structure to report and measure the results.
 
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
There are no recent accounting pronouncements that we have not implemented that are expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
 

 
10

 

ITEM 2:  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont.)
 
 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
 
Our cash position decreased during the period. At March 31, 2008 we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $2.5 million as compared with cash and cash equivalents of $3.0 million at December 31, 2007.  This decrease in cash is primarily the result of cash used in operating activities.
 
Our cash used in operating activities decreased from $774,194 in the 2007 Period to $477,813 in the 2008 Period. This is primarily the result of operating factors discussed below in the “Results of Operations” section. We would expect our cash used in operating activities to fluctuate in future quarters in 2008, depending on the timing of receipt of various items. We expect reduced cash used in operations, or positive cash flow from operations, later in 2008 as a result of  increasing revenues, while expenses increase at a much lower rate.
 
We used cash in financing activities of $7,049 during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “2008 Period”), as compared with cash flow from financing activities of $107,253 during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “2007 Period”). The cash flow in the 2007 Period resulted from the issuance of common stock in connection with the exercise of stock options. The cash used in the 2008 Period was the result of payments on capital leases.
 
We used net cash of $42,710 for investing activities in the 2007 Period related to the purchase of research equipment, compared with cash used in investing activities related to equipment purchases of $6,395 in the 2008 Period. We expect cash used in investing activities to remain at relatively insignificant levels for the balance of 2008.
 
The principal source of our liquidity has been funds received from exempt offerings of common stock. Given our current cash balance, which is approximately $2 million, we do not expect that we will need to raise additional funds in 2008; however in the event that we do, we may seek to sell additional debt or equity securities. While we expect to be able to obtain any funds needed for operations, there can be no assurance that any of these financing alternatives can be arranged on commercially acceptable terms. We believe that our success in reaching profitability will be dependent on our patent portfolio and upon the viability of products using our technology and their acceptance in the marketplace, as well as our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financings in the future, if needed.
 
We expect to continue to incur substantial expenses for research and development  ("R&D"). Further, we believe that certain products that may be developed by potential licensees of our technology may not be available for commercial sale or routine use for a period of one to two years. Others are expected to be available in 2008. While we would likely receive initial license payments, ongoing royalty streams related to some licenses may not be available until potential licensees have introduced products using our technology. Therefore, it is possible that the commercialization of our existing and proposed products may require additional capital in excess of our current funding. We do, however, have a plan to operate profitably in 2008 based on the receipt of research funding and other revenues. Achievement of at least break-even would enable us to continue our research without seeking additional debt or equity financing in the future.
 
Because the timing and receipt of revenues from the license or royalty agreements will be tied to the achievement of certain product development, testing and marketing objectives, which cannot be predicted with certainty, there may be substantial fluctuations in our results of operations. If revenues do not increase as rapidly as anticipated, or if product development and testing require more funding than anticipated, we may be required to curtail our operations or seek additional financing from other sources at some point in the future. The combined effect of the foregoing may prevent us from achieving sustained profitability for an extended period of time.
 

 
11

 

ITEM 2:  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont.)
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Our loss from operations for the 2008 Period was $747,579 as compared with the loss from the operations of $1,345,887 for 2007 Period. Our total revenues for the 2008 Period were slightly lower than in the 2007 Period; however our costs associated with the revenues decreased by a similar amount during the 2008 Period. The reasons for the decreased loss are discussed in more detail below.
 
Our revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, totaled $870,014 compared to $956,867 for the same quarter in 2007. The revenues in both periods were all from ANI and substantially all the result of reimbursed research expenditures. During the 2007 Period, $517,416 of the revenue came from government contracts and $439,451came from other private sources. In the 2008 Period, our revenue from government contracts increased to $545,824, and our revenue from other commercial sources decreased to $324,190. At the present stage of our development, significant conclusions cannot be drawn by comparing revenues from period to period; however, we would expect the quarterly revenue for the balance of 2008 to increase above the first quarter level. Our business strategy is built on developing a royalty stream from licensing our intellectual property. To supplement this, we also seek funding from both governmental and private sources to help fund our research. Until we are able to develop a steady revenue stream from royalties, our revenues will tend to fluctuate greatly from quarter to quarter. Our private research funding tends to come in large amounts at sporadic times.
 
We have a revenue backlog of approximately $3.2 million as of March 31, 2008 and we expect our revenue to continue at or above current levels in future quarters as a result of this backlog. We had a total revenue backlog of approximately $2.6 million as of March 31, 2007. Our ability to perform continued research, or fulfill our backlog, should not require significant additional personnel.
 
We incurred research and development expenses of $1,182,135 for the 2008 Period, which was an increase from the $1,075,501 incurred in the 2007 Period. This reflects a general increase in the level of activity and the costs associated with the new revenue producing projects. We expect research and development expenditures to continue to gradually increase for the remainder of the year as additional new projects begin. Significant new revenue producing research programs beyond those already identified could, however, cause research and development expenditures to increase further.
 
Our selling, general, and administrative expenses were $1,055,270 for the 2008 Period, compared with $1,238,683 for the 2007 Period – a decrease of about $185,000. Included in the 2008 Period are approximately $150,000 of litigation related expenses, a decrease of roughly $275,000 from the 2007 Period. This decrease in litigation related expenses was partially offset by an increase in other selling, general, and administrative expenses, including other professional services.
 
Our interest income is insignificant, but increased during the 2008 Period as a result of a higher average level of invested cash balances. Our interest income results from the investment of excess funds in short term interest bearing instruments, primarily certificates of deposit, commercial paper, and money market funds. We expect our interest income to remain at insignificant levels for the balance of 2008. Our interest expense was insignificant in both periods and is expected to remain so for the balance of the year.
 
During the 2008 Period, we also had a gain of $100,000 from the sale of certain excess patents, which we were no longer using and which did not relate to any of our current technology platforms. The 2008 Period also included a gain of $500,000 from a partial settlement related to the Keesmann litigation, which is discussed in greater deal in Part II, Item 1 to this report.
 

 

 
12

 

ITEM 3.       QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
We do not use any derivative financial instruments for hedging, speculative, or trading purposes. Our exposure to market risk is currently immaterial.
 

 
ITEM 4.       CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this report (the "Evaluation Date"). Based upon this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the material information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to the Company, including, our consolidated subsidiaries, and was made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared.
 
In addition, there were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date. We have not identified any material weaknesses in our internal controls, and therefore, no corrective actions were taken.
 

 
13

 

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
 Canon litigation
 
In April 2005, we filed suit against the Japanese camera and copier manufacturer Canon, Inc., and its wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary Canon USA, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, seeking a declaratory judgment that new SED color television products being developed and manufactured by a Canon/Toshiba joint venture are not covered under a non-exclusive 1999 patent license agreement that we granted to Canon.  We asserted that the Canon/Toshiba joint-venture – SED, Inc. – was not a licensed party under that agreement.  The original complaint asserted additional claims related to whether the Canon/Toshiba joint venture’s television panels constituted excluded products under the 1999 license, as well as breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference and a Lanham Act violation by Canon. In the fall of 2005, Canon moved to dismiss Canon U.S.A. from the litigation, and moved to dismiss several of the counts asserted.  The court denied the motion, in part, by ruling that Canon U.S.A. was an appropriate defendant and refusing to dismiss our claims for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.  Our tortious interference and Lanham Act claims were dismissed, without prejudice.
 
After initial discovery, in April 2006, we amended the complaint to drop one count related to the definition of excluded products in the 1999 license, and add two counts for fraudulent inducement and fraudulent non-disclosure related to events and representations made during our negotiations on the license,  and leading up to and following the formation by Canon and Toshiba of their joint venture effort, including Canon’s failure to disclose an ongoing relationship with Toshiba and misrepresentations made to us about the joint venture’s structure and operation.  Canon moved to dismiss the fraud claims, and the Court denied Canon’s motion in May 2006.  Discovery was completed in August 2006. Upon completion of discovery, Canon filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking to dismiss the claim that SED is not a licensed party under the agreement. Canon did not file a motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss the other claims. In November 2006, the Court denied Canon’s partial motion for summary judgment, describing SED, Inc. as a “corporate fiction designed for the sole purpose of evading Canon’s contractual obligations”.
 
In January 2007, Canon filed another motion for partial summary judgment seeking a declaration that a reconstituted SED, Inc. which is purportedly owned 100% by Canon but which still involved numerous reciprocal agreements with Toshiba, would be considered a Canon subsidiary. At the same time, we filed a motion for partial summary judgment, seeking the Court’s affirmation of our termination of the license agreement due to Canon’s breach of contract in 2004. On February 22, 2007, the Court issued a ruling denying Canon’s motion and granting our motion for partial summary judgment, ruling our termination of the contract effective December 1, 2006 to be valid.
 
A trial on the case began on April 30, 2007 and a final judgment was entered in the case in May 2007. The final judgment reaffirmed Canon’s material breach of the patent license, while awarding no additional damages. Both parties have filed appeals related to the litigation. All appeal briefs and responses have been filed with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and oral arguments in the case have been tentatively scheduled for the week of June 2, 2008.
 
Keesmann litigation
 
In May 2006 we filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against Till Keesmann, a German citizen who in 2000 granted us an exclusive and perpetual license to certain of his U.S. and European patents in carbon nanotube cathode technology.   The complaint, which resulted from Keesmann’s attempted termination of the license in March 2006, seeks a declaratory judgment that Keesmann had no right to terminate the exclusive license. We also filed for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction to prevent Keesmann from taking any actions inconsistent with his obligations under the exclusive license.
 
In June 2006, Keesmann filed an Answer and Counterclaim, denying that the purported termination was null and void, and asserting a counterclaim that asks the court to find that we breached the exclusive license by not actively marketing the Keesmann patents, among other things.  The Court granted a consent order that prevents Keesmann from licensing the patents pending an injunction hearing and decision.
 
In January 2007, the Court granted our motion for preliminary injunction, ruling that there is a reasonable likelihood that we will prevail on the merits of the case. The preliminary injunction enjoins Keesmann, his agents, employees, and all those acting in concert with him from terminating the license agreement for the reasons asserted in the March 2006 default notice, or otherwise acting in violation of the license agreement. In connection with this injunction, the Court set a surety bond, which is required by law, at $100,000. We posted the bond in February 2007.  Days after the Court issued the injunction, Keesmann again asserted a number of alleged defaults under the license. In April 2007, we filed a second motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. This second motion was withdrawn, without prejudice in March 2008.
 
In 2005, Keesmann conveyed part of his interests in the Exclusive License to investors associated with a German patent evaluation firm, IP Bewertungs AG (“IPB”).  In December 2006, we amended our original complaint to add these investors as additional defendants. The amended complaint also contains additional claims including breach of contract, conversion, aiding and abetting conversion, conspiracy to commit conversion, misappropriation, aiding and abetting misappropriation, conspiracy to commit conversion, Lanham Act violations, tortious interference with a prospective economic relationship, aiding and abetting tortious interference with a prospective economic relationship, and conspiracy to tortiously interfere with a prospective economic relationship. We completed a settlement agreement with these additional defendants in February 2008. As a result of this settlement agreement, we received a payment of $500,000 in exchange for dropping all claims against these defendants. Mr. Keesmann did not participate in this settlement and the litigation against Mr. Keesmann continues. No trial date has been set for this matter.
 
14


 
ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
There were no sales of unregistered equity securities during the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
 

 
ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS
 
       (a)     Exhibits: See Index to Exhibits on page 17 for a descriptive response to this item.
 

 
15

 

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
NANO-PROPRIETARY, INC.
(Registrant)
   
Date:     April 29, 2008
     /s/ Thomas F. Bijou                                   
Thomas F. Bijou
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
   
Date:     April 29, 2008 
     /s/ Douglas P. Baker                                  
Douglas P. Baker
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)
 
 

 

 
16

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 
The following documents are filed as part of this Report:
 
Exhibit
 
   
11
Computation of (Loss) Per Common Share
   
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Thomas F. Bijou
   
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Douglas P. Baker
   
32.1
Section 1350 Certificate of Thomas F. Bijou
   
32.2
Section 1350 Certificate of Douglas P. Baker
 
 
 
 
 
 
17