Nano Magic Inc. - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
ý Quarterly report
under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
¨ Transition report
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
COMMISSION
FILE NO. 1-11602
APPLIED
NANOTECH HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS
|
76-0273345
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
3006
Longhorn Blvd., Suite 107
|
|
Austin,
Texas
|
78758
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(512)
339-5020
|
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Nano-Proprietary,
Inc.
|
(Registrant's
Former Name)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
[X]
Yes
|
[ ]
No
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of
“accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company”
in rule 12b-2 of the Act.
Large
Accelerated Filer o
Accelerated Filer þ
Non-accelerated
Filer o Smaller
Reporting Company o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
[
] Yes
|
[ X]
No
|
As of
October 29, 2008, the registrant had 107,343,549 shares of common stock, par
value $.001 per share, issued and outstanding.
APPLIED
NANOTECH HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX
Part
I. Financial Information
|
Page
|
|||
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets--September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
|
3
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations --Three Months and Nine Months Ended
September
30, 2008 and 2007
|
4
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows --Nine Months Ended
September
30, 2008 and 2007
|
5
|
|||
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|||
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition
and Results of Operations
|
9
|
|||
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
12
|
|||
Item 4. Controls and
Procedures
|
12
|
|||
Part
II. Other Information
|
||||
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
|
13
|
|||
Item
6. Exhibits
|
13
|
|||
Signatures
|
14
|
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
APPLIED
NANOTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
|
(Unaudited)
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 1,169,813 | $ | 3,020,096 | ||||
Accounts
receivable – net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
525,585 | 253,963 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
107,991 | 77,038 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
1,803,389 | 3,351,097 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
298,251 | 278,456 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
19,901 | 115,305 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 2,121,541 | $ | 3,744,858 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 654,471 | $ | 447,106 | ||||
Obligations
under capital lease
|
37,291 | 29,416 | ||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
145,476 | 103,003 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
45,090 | 306,427 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
882,328 | 885,952 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital lease, long-term
|
34,553 | 30,004 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
– | – | ||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
916,881 | 915,956 | ||||||
Stockholders'
(deficit):
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $1.00 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized;
No
shares issued and outstanding
|
– | – | ||||||
Common
stock, $.00l par value, 120,000,000 shares authorized,
107,343,549
and 107,173,549 shares issued and outstanding at
September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
|
107,344 | 107,174 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
109,123,350 | 108,580,565 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(108,026,034 | ) | (105,858,837 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity
|
1,204,660 | 2,828,902 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$ | 2,121,541 | $ | 3,744,858 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
3
APPLIED
NANOTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
For the
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
|
For
the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
Government
contracts
|
$ | 625,484 | $ | 664,541 | $ | 1,782,875 | $ | 1,741,115 | ||||||||
Contract
research
|
230,001 | 203,708 | 589,358 | 721,157 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
36,368 | 181,500 | 242,868 | 460,382 | ||||||||||||
Total
Revenues
|
891,853 | 1,049,749 | 2,615,101 | 2,922,654 | ||||||||||||
Research
and development
|
1,167,488 | 1,136,220 | 3,557,379 | 3,207,932 | ||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
1,029,750 | 704,222 | 3,091,758 | 3,144,294 | ||||||||||||
Operating
costs and expenses
|
2,197,238 | 1,840,442 | 6,649,137 | 6,352,226 | ||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of intellectual property and other assets
|
1,225,999 | – | 1,329,571 | – | ||||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(79,386 | ) | (790,693 | ) | (2,704,465 | ) | (3,429,572 | ) | ||||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
Expense
|
(2,010 | ) | (80 | ) | (5,008 | ) | (349 | ) | ||||||||
Interest
Income
|
6,819 | 30,863 | 42,276 | 94,337 | ||||||||||||
Litigation
Settlement
|
– | – | 500,000 | – | ||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before taxes
|
(74,577 | ) | (759,910 | ) | (2,167,197 | ) | (3,335,584 | ) | ||||||||
Provision
for taxes
|
– | – | – | – | ||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (74,577 | ) | $ | (759,910 | ) | $ | (2,167,197 | ) | $ | (3,335,584 | ) | ||||
Loss
per share
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
and Diluted
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
and Diluted
|
107,338,332 | 107,173,060 | 107,265,556 | 106,034,229 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
4
APPLIED
NANOTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
For
the Nine Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (2,167,197 | ) | $ | (3,335,584 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net
|
||||||||
cash
used in operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
51,900 | 31,394 | ||||||
Stock
based compensation expense
|
481,705 | 204,800 | ||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable, trade
|
(271,622 | ) | (147,203 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
64,451 | (161,045 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
249,838 | 398,494 | ||||||
Customer
deposits and deferred revenue
|
(261,337 | ) | 322,784 | |||||
Total
adjustments
|
314,935 | 649,224 | ||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,852,262 | ) | (2,686,360 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of fixed assets
|
(36,705 | ) | (51,470 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(36,705 | ) | (51,470 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Repayment
of capital leases
|
(22,566 | ) | – | |||||
Proceeds
from stock issuance, net of costs
|
61,250 | 6,304,424 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
38,684 | 6,304,424 | ||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,850,283 | ) | 3,566,594 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
3,020,096 | 2,085,338 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 1,169,813 | $ | 5,651,932 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
5
APPLIED
NANOTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis
of Presentation
The
consolidated financial statements for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 have been prepared by us without audit pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows as of September 30, 2008 and
2007, and for the periods then ended, have been made. Those adjustments consist
of normal and recurring adjustments. The consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2007, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet
as of that date.
Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in our annual financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with a reading of the financial statements and notes
thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.
The
results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full
year.
2. Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
Cash
paid for interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, was
$5,008 and $349, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007, the Company had non-cash transactions related to share based payments
covered by FAS 123R. These transactions are described in greater detail in Note
4. The Company also had a non-cash transaction in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 in the amount of $34,990 related to the acquisition of
equipment under a capital lease.
3. Stockholders’
Equity
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we issued 2,608,698 restricted shares
of common stock and received net proceeds of $6,000,000 in an exempt offering
under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933. In connection with this
offering, we also issued warrants enabling the holders to purchase 1,304,353
shares of our common stock at a price of $2.50 per share through December 2008.
We also issued 307,244 shares of common stock and received proceeds of $304,424
in connection with the exercise of stock options during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
In the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we issued 170,000 shares of common stock and received
proceeds of $61,250 in connection with the exercise of stock
options.
4. Share-Based
Payments
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company
adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (Revised
2004), Share-Based Payment, which requires that the compensation cost relating
to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements based
on the provisions of SFAS 123 issued in 1995.
The Company recorded $441,670 in
compensation expense in the period ended September 30, 2008, related to options
issued under its stock-based incentive compensation plans. This includes expense
related to both options issued in the current year and options issued in prior
years for which the requisite service period for those options includes the
current year. The fair value of these options was calculated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. Information related to the assumptions used
in this model is set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. For options issued in 2008, the same
assumptions were used except that risk free interest rates ranging from 1.74% to
3.13% were used, and an annualized volatility rate of approximately 75% was
used. The period ended September 30, 2008 also includes $40,035 of expense
related to restricted stock provided to non-employee Directors of the Company as
compensation.
The Company recorded $204,800 in
compensation expense in the period ended September 30, 2007, related to options
issued under its stock-based incentive compensation plans.
6
APPLIED
NANOTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
5. Contingencies
Litigation
The Company is a defendant in minor
lawsuits described in greater detail in its 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The
Company expects any potential eventual payment to have no material affect on the
financial statements.
Canon
Litigation
In April 2005, we filed suit against
the Japanese camera and copier manufacturer Canon, Inc., and its wholly-owned
U.S. subsidiary Canon USA, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Western
District of Texas, Austin Division, seeking a declaratory
judgment that new SED color television products being developed
and manufactured by a Canon/Toshiba joint venture are not covered under a
non-exclusive 1999 patent license agreement that we granted to Canon.
We asserted that the Canon/Toshiba joint-venture – SED, Inc. – was not a
licensed party under that agreement. The original complaint asserted
additional claims related to whether the Canon/Toshiba joint venture’s
television panels constituted excluded products under the 1999 license, as well
as breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference and
a Lanham Act violation by Canon. In the fall of 2005, Canon moved to dismiss
Canon U.S.A. from the litigation, and moved to dismiss several of the counts
asserted. The court denied the motion, in part, by ruling that Canon
U.S.A. was an appropriate defendant and refusing to dismiss our claims for
breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Our tortious
interference and Lanham Act claims were dismissed, without
prejudice.
After initial discovery, in April 2006,
we amended the complaint to drop one count related to the definition of excluded
products in the 1999 license, and add two counts for fraudulent inducement and
fraudulent non-disclosure related to events and representations made during our
negotiations on the license, and leading up to and following the
formation by Canon and Toshiba of their joint venture effort, including Canon’s
failure to disclose an ongoing relationship with Toshiba and misrepresentations
made to us about the joint venture’s structure and operation. Canon
moved to dismiss the fraud claims, and the Court denied Canon’s motion in May
2006. Discovery was completed in August 2006. Upon completion of
discovery, Canon filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking to dismiss
the claim that SED is not a licensed party under the agreement. Canon did not
file a motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss the other claims. In
November 2006, the Court denied Canon’s partial motion for summary judgment,
describing SED, Inc. as a “corporate fiction designed for the sole purpose of
evading Canon’s contractual obligations”.
In January 2007, Canon filed another
motion for partial summary judgment seeking a declaration that a reconstituted
SED, Inc. which is purportedly owned 100% by Canon but which still involved
numerous reciprocal agreements with Toshiba, would be considered a Canon
subsidiary. At the same time, we filed a motion for partial summary judgment,
seeking the Court’s affirmation of our termination of the license agreement due
to Canon’s breach of contract in 2004. On February 22, 2007, the Court issued a
ruling denying Canon’s motion and granting our motion for partial summary
judgment, ruling our termination of the contract effective December 1, 2006 to
be valid.
A trial on the case began on April 30,
2007 and a final judgment was entered in the case in May 2007. The final
judgment reaffirmed Canon’s material breach of the patent license, while
awarding no additional damages. Both parties filed appeals related to the
litigation with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and oral arguments in the
case were held on June 4, 2008. In July 2008, the Court of Appeals reversed the
District Court’s ruling related to our termination of the contract and
reinstated Canon’s non-exclusive license. The Court of Appeals also affirmed the
District Court’s ruling related to our appeal of the District Court’s exclusion
of certain evidence at the time of trial. We asked the Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals for an en banc review of the decision by the full court, but that
request was denied. There is no longer any contingent liability associated with
this litigation.
Keesmann
Litigation
In June 2008 we settled the litigation
that was in process with Mr. Till Keesmann and there is no longer any contingent
liability associated with that litigation.
7
APPLIED
NANOTECH HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
6. Business
Segments
Following
is information related to our business segments for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007:
ANI
|
EBT
|
All
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 2,615,101 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,615,101 | ||||||||
Profit
(Loss)
|
(1,245,088 | ) | (520 | ) | (921,589 | ) | (2,167,197 | ) | ||||||||
Expenditures
for
|
||||||||||||||||
long-lived
assets
|
36,705 | - | - | 36,705 | ||||||||||||
2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 2,922,654 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,922,654 | ||||||||
Profit
(Loss)
|
(2,365,586 | ) | (1,298 | ) | (968,700 | ) | (3,335,584 | ) | ||||||||
Expenditures
for
|
||||||||||||||||
long-lived
assets
|
51,470 | - | - | 51,470 |
8
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following is management’s
discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected our
financial position and operating results during the periods included in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains certain
forward-looking statements that we believe are within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by such acts.
For this purpose, any statements that are not statements of historical fact may
be deemed to be forward-looking statements, including the statements under
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" regarding our strategy, future operations, future expectations or
future estimates, financial position and objectives of management. Those
statements in this Form 10-Q containing the words "believes," "anticipates,"
"plans," "expects" and similar expressions constitute forward-looking
statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying
words. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations
and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to
our operations, results of operations, competitive factors, shifts in market
demand and other risks and uncertainties.
Although
we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are
reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and actual results may
differ from those indicated by the forward-looking statements included in this
Form 10-Q. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q, you should not consider
the inclusion of such information as a representation by us or anyone else that
we will achieve such results. Moreover, we assume no obligation to update these
forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or
changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
OVERVIEW
We are
primarily a nanotechnology company engaged in the development of proofs of
concepts of products and materials , and the performance of funded research
based principally on our intellectual property. During all periods presented,
our primary revenues were earned as a result of reimbursed research expenditures
at our Applied Nanotech, Inc. (“ANI”) subsidiary. As more fully discussed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, we expect to
incur additional research and development expenses throughout 2008 in developing
our technology. We are focused on licensing our technology and obtaining
sufficient revenue to cover our ongoing research expenditures.
OUTLOOK
We expect
our present cash balance, which is approximately $1.1 million as of the date of
this filing, when combined with expected revenue sources, to enable us to
operate at current levels through the end of the first quarter 2009. We expect
to sign a significant license agreement by April 2009 which will then allow us
to operate at least through the end of 2009. Unanticipated expenses such as
litigation or other non-recurring items could cause us to require additional
cash before the end of March 2009. At this point, it is unlikely that we will
achieve breakeven for 2008, but our expectation is that we will be profitable in
2009. There can be no assurance that we will achieve profitability, or even
break-even, or that expected revenue sources will all occur as planned. The mix
of revenues received could also cause the revenues required to reach break-even
to increase. If revenue producing projects require unanticipated expenses, or
heavier than anticipated use of outside services or materials, we may be unable
to achieve profitability at the expected level of revenues. We believe that we
have the ability to continue to raise funding, if necessary, to enable us to
continue operations until our plan can be completed.
This plan
is based on current development plans, current operating plans, the current
regulatory environment, historical experience in the development of products and
general economic conditions. Changes could occur which would cause certain
assumptions on which this plan is based to be no longer valid. Although we do
not expect funding our operations to be a problem, if adequate funds are not
available from operations, or additional sources of financing, we may have to
eliminate, or reduce substantially, expenditures for research and development,
testing and production of its products, or obtain funds through arrangements
with other entities that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our
technologies or products. Such results would materially and adversely affect
us.
9
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS (cont.)
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
In July 2008, we entered into a
transaction with IP Verwertungs GmbH (“IPV”) related to our license agreement
with Mr. Till Keesmann. In connection with this agreement, we received $1.2
million in July 2008. We will receive up to an additional $200,000 by offsetting
this amount from IPV’s share of future royalties. In exchange for its payment,
IPV will receive a portion of our royalties received as a result of Keesmann
sublicenses. Initially, IPV will receive 25% of our portion of the royalties
received from sublicenses. That percentage will increase to 50% once total
royalties related to the Keesmann patents of approximately $5.0 million have
been generated.
In October 2008, we signed a license
agreement with a large sporting goods manufacturer that included an initial
royalty payment of $577,000 and an ongoing royalty payment of 4% of the
manufacturer’s sales of products including the licensed technology. The initial
royalty payment of $577,000 is payable in two installments. The first
installment of the initial royalty payment in the amount of $277,000
is due in October 2008 and the balance of $300,000 is due in the first quarter
of 2009.
In September 2008, we were awarded a
SBIR Phase II project by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security titled CNT
Based D2 Ion Source for Improved Neutron and Proton Generator in the amount of
approximately $265,000. After approximately six months, it is expected that the
program will be expanded to approximately $1.0 million.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
There are no recent accounting
pronouncements that we have not implemented that are expected to have a material
impact on our financial statements.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Our cash
position decreased during the period. At September 30, 2008 we had cash and cash
equivalents in the amount of $1,169,813 as compared with cash and cash
equivalents of $3,020,096 at December 31, 2007. This decrease in cash
is primarily the result of cash used in operating activities.
Our net
cash used in operating activities decreased from approximately $2.7 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 (the “2007 Period”) to approximately
$1.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (the “2008 Period”).
This is primarily the result of operating factors discussed below in the
“Results of Operations” We expect our cash used in operating activities to be no
greater than $500,000 in the fourth quarter of 2008 based on increasing revenues
and decreasing expenses.
We
received net cash from financing activities of $38,684 during 2008 Period, as
compared with cash flow from financing activities of $6,304,424 during the 2007
Period. The cash flow in the 2007 Period resulted from the issuance of common
stock in connection with a private placement of our common stock and from the
exercise of stock options. The cash flow in the 2008 Period was the result of
the exercise of stock options, partially offset by payments on capital leases.
We would expect net cash flow from financing activities to be insignificant for
the remainder of 2008.
Cash used
in investing activities in both periods was insignificant and related to the
purchase of capital equipment. We expect cash used in investing activities to
remain at relatively insignificant levels for the balance of 2008.
10
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS (cont.)
The
principal source of our liquidity has been funds received from exempt offerings
of common stock. We believe our current cash balance, which is approximately
$1.1 million, is sufficient to last us through March 2009. We expect to sign
agreements during that period which will extend the time period that cash will
last through the end of 2009. However in the event that we do determine that we
need additional cash, we may seek to sell additional debt or equity securities.
While we expect to continue to be able to obtain any funds needed for
operations, there can be no assurance that any of these financing alternatives
can be arranged on commercially acceptable terms. We believe that our success in
reaching profitability will be dependent on our patent portfolio and upon the
viability of products using our technology and their acceptance in the
marketplace, as well as our ability to obtain additional debt or equity
financings in the future, if needed.
We expect
to continue to incur substantial expenses for research and
development ("R&D"). Further, we believe that certain products
that may be developed by potential licensees of our technology may not be
available for commercial sale or routine use for a period of one to two years.
Others are expected to be available in 2009. While we would likely receive
initial license payments, ongoing royalty streams related to some licenses will
not be available until potential licensees have introduced products using our
technology. Therefore, it is possible that the commercialization of our existing
and proposed products may require additional capital in excess of our current
funding. We do, however, have a plan to operate profitably in 2009 based on the
receipt of research funding, licenses, and other revenues. A significant
component of this plan involves signing one or more license agreements with up
front payments. Achievement of at least break-even would enable us to continue
our research without seeking additional debt or equity financing in the
future.
Because
the timing and receipt of revenues from the license or royalty agreements will
be tied to the achievement of certain product development, testing and marketing
objectives, which cannot be predicted with certainty, there may be substantial
fluctuations in our results of operations. If revenues do not increase as
rapidly as anticipated, or if product development and testing require more
funding than anticipated, we may be required to curtail our operations or seek
additional financing from other sources at some point in the future. The
combined effect of the foregoing may prevent us from achieving sustained
profitability for an extended period of time.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Our net
loss for the third quarter ended September 30, 2008 was $74,577 as compared with
the loss of $759,910 for the same period last year. Our net loss of $2,167,197
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was significantly lower than the
loss of $3,335,584 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This decreased
loss was the result of reasons set forth below. We expect our quarterly loss in
the fourth quarter of 2008 to be larger than the third quarter of 2008, but
significantly reduced from that of the first two quarters of 2008.
Our
revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 totaled $891,853 compared to
$1,049,749 for the same quarter of 2007. For the 2008 Period, our revenues were
$2,615,101 as compared with $2,922,654 for the 2007 Period, a slight decrease.
The revenues in both periods were all from ANI and substantially all the result
of reimbursed research expenditures. The majority of revenues in both periods
came from government contracts. At the present stage of our development,
significant conclusions cannot be drawn by comparing revenues from period to
period; however, we would expect the revenue for the fourth quarter of 2008 to
increase above the level of the first three quarters of 2008. Our business
strategy is built on developing a royalty stream from licensing our intellectual
property. To supplement this, we also seek funding from both governmental and
private sources to help fund our research. Until we are able to develop a steady
revenue stream from royalties, our revenues will tend to fluctuate greatly from
quarter to quarter. Our private research funding tends to come in large amounts
at sporadic times.
We have a
revenue backlog of approximately $3.5 million as of the date of this filing, an
increase over our backlog of approximately $3.4 million as of September 30,
2007, and we expect our revenue to remain at or above current levels in future
quarters as a result of this backlog. Our ability to perform continued research,
or fulfill our backlog, will not require additional personnel. We do not
anticipate hiring any additional people for the balance of the year, unless we
receive significant new revenues.
We
incurred research and development expenses of $3,557,379 in the 2008 Period,
which was higher than the amount of $3,207,932 incurred in the 2007 Period. This
reflects a general increase in the level of our activity and the costs
associated with the revenue producing projects. We expect research and
development expenditures to gradually decrease for the remainder of the year as
we cut back our spending on projects that are not funded by outside
sources. Significant new revenue producing research programs beyond
those already identified could, however, cause research and development
expenditures to increase further.
11
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS (cont.)
Our selling, general, and
administrative expenses were $3,091,758 for the 2008 Period, compared with
$3,144,294 for the 2007 Period – a slight decrease. The main reason for this
decrease was decreased litigation expenses. We had litigation related expenses
of approximately $1.0 million in the 2007 Period, but only approximately
$200,000 in the 2008 Period. The majority of the litigation expense in the 2007
Period related to the Canon litigation and expenses associated with the trial.
The majority of the litigation expense in the 2008 Period related to the
Keesmann litigation and the related multipart settlement. We expect litigation
expenses to be virtually zero in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Offsetting this decrease in litigation
expense were increases in other areas. Our stock based compensation expense
included in selling, general, and administrative expense increased from
approximately $80,000 in the 2007 Period to approximately $335,000 in the 2008
Period. We also incurred increased costs in the area of patent filings and
maintenance fees, and consultants. We would expect our selling, general and
administrative expenses to be lower in the fourth quarter of 2008 than in the
first three quarters as a result of the expected decrease in litigation expenses
discussed in the preceding paragraph and other cost saving measures that we have
implemented.
Our interest income is insignificant,
but decreased during the 2008 Period as a result of a lower average level of
invested cash balances. Our interest income results from the investment of
excess funds in short term interest bearing instruments, primarily certificates
of deposit, commercial paper, and money market funds. We expect our interest
income to remain at insignificant levels for the balance of 2008. Our interest
expense, which is related to capital leases, was insignificant in both periods
and is expected to remain so for the balance of the year.
During the 2008 Period, we also had
gains of approximately $1.3 million from the sale of intellectual property.
Approximately $1.2 million came from the sale of a portion of our interest in
the Keesmann patents as described in “Recent Developments” of this Item 2. Also
included is $100,000 from the sale of certain patents which we were no longer
using and which did not relate to any of our current technology platforms. The
2008 Period also included a gain of $500,000 from the settlement related to the
additional defendants in the Keesmann litigation. No similar items were included
in 2007.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not
use any derivative financial instruments for hedging, speculative, or trading
purposes. Our exposure to market risk is currently immaterial.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this
report (the "Evaluation Date"). Based upon this evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the Evaluation
Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the
material information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to the
Company, including, our consolidated subsidiaries, and was made known to them by
others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report
was being prepared.
In
addition, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the
Evaluation Date. We have not identified any significant deficiencies or material
weaknesses in our internal controls, and therefore, there were no corrective
actions taken.
12
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Canon
litigation
In April 2005, we filed suit against
the Japanese camera and copier manufacturer Canon, Inc., and its wholly-owned
U.S. subsidiary Canon USA, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Western
District of Texas, Austin Division, seeking a declaratory
judgment that new SED color television products being developed
and manufactured by a Canon/Toshiba joint venture are not covered under a
non-exclusive 1999 patent license agreement that we granted to Canon.
We asserted that the Canon/Toshiba joint-venture – SED, Inc. – was not a
licensed party under that agreement. The original complaint asserted
additional claims related to whether the Canon/Toshiba joint venture’s
television panels constituted excluded products under the 1999 license, as well
as breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference and
a Lanham Act violation by Canon. In the fall of 2005, Canon moved to dismiss
Canon U.S.A. from the litigation, and moved to dismiss several of the counts
asserted. The court denied the motion, in part, by ruling that Canon
U.S.A. was an appropriate defendant and refusing to dismiss our claims for
breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Our tortious
interference and Lanham Act claims were dismissed, without
prejudice.
After initial discovery, in April 2006,
we amended the complaint to drop one count related to the definition of excluded
products in the 1999 license, and add two counts for fraudulent inducement and
fraudulent non-disclosure related to events and representations made during our
negotiations on the license, and leading up to and following the
formation by Canon and Toshiba of their joint venture effort, including Canon’s
failure to disclose an ongoing relationship with Toshiba and misrepresentations
made to us about the joint venture’s structure and operation. Canon
moved to dismiss the fraud claims, and the Court denied Canon’s motion in May
2006. Discovery was completed in August 2006. Upon completion of
discovery, Canon filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking to dismiss
the claim that SED is not a licensed party under the agreement. Canon did not
file a motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss the other claims. In
November 2006, the Court denied Canon’s partial motion for summary judgment,
describing SED, Inc. as a “corporate fiction designed for the sole purpose of
evading Canon’s contractual obligations”.
In January 2007, Canon filed another
motion for partial summary judgment seeking a declaration that a reconstituted
SED, Inc. which is purportedly owned 100% by Canon but which still involved
numerous reciprocal agreements with Toshiba, would be considered a Canon
subsidiary. At the same time, we filed a motion for partial summary judgment,
seeking the Court’s affirmation of our termination of the license agreement due
to Canon’s breach of contract in 2004. On February 22, 2007, the Court issued a
ruling denying Canon’s motion and granting our motion for partial summary
judgment, ruling our termination of the contract effective December 1, 2006 to
be valid.
A trial on the case began on April 30,
2007 and a final judgment was entered in the case in May 2007. The final
judgment reaffirmed Canon’s material breach of the patent license, while
awarding no additional damages. Both parties have filed appeals related to the
litigation. All appeal briefs and responses have been filed with the Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals and oral arguments in the case were held on June 4,
2008. In July 2008, the Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s ruling
related to our termination of the contract and reinstated Canon’s non-exclusive
license. The Court of Appeals also affirmed the District Court’s ruling related
to our appeal of the District Court’s exclusion of certain evidence at the time
of trial. We asked the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for an en banc review of
the decision by the full court, but that request was denied.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits:
See Index to Exhibits on page 15 for a descriptive response to this
item.
13
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
APPLIED
NANOTECH HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: October
31, 2008
|
/s/ Thomas F.
Bijou
Thomas
F. Bijou
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
Date: October
31, 2008
|
/s/
Douglas P.
Baker
Douglas
P. Baker
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting
Officer)
|
14
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
The
following documents are filed as part of this Report:
Exhibit
|
|
11
|
Computation
of (Loss) Per Common Share
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Thomas F. Bijou
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Douglas P. Baker
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certificate of Thomas F. Bijou
|
32.2
|
Section
1350 Certificate of Douglas P.
Baker
|
15