NATIONAL BANKSHARES INC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[x]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
|
[ ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
For the
transition period from ________ to ________
Commission
File Number 0-15204
NATIONAL
BANKSHARES, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
54-1375874
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
101
Hubbard Street
P.
O. Box 90002
Blacksburg,
VA
|
24062-9002
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(540)
951-6300
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. [x] Yes [ ]
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). [x]
Yes [ ] No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated
filer [ ] Accelerated
filer [x] Non-accelerated
filer [ ] Smaller
reporting company [ ]
(Do not
check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b–2 of the Exchange Act).
[ ]
Yes [x] No
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Common
Stock, $1.25 Par Value
|
Outstanding at October 31,
2009
6,933,474
|
(This
report contains 30 pages)
NATIONAL
BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Form
10-Q
Index
Page
|
||
Item
1
|
3
|
|
3
|
||
4
|
||
5
|
||
6
|
||
7-8
|
||
9-17
|
||
Item
2
|
17-25
|
|
Item
3
|
25
|
|
Item
4
|
25
|
|
Item
1
|
25
|
|
Item
1A
|
25
|
|
Item
2
|
25
|
|
Item
3
|
25
|
|
Item
4
|
25
|
|
Item
5
|
26
|
|
Item
6
|
26
|
|
26
|
||
27
|
Financial
Information
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
$
in thousands, except share data
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
11,891
|
$
|
16,316
|
||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
22,935
|
29,656
|
||||||
Securities
available for sale, at fair value
|
169,457
|
147,227
|
||||||
Securities
held to maturity (fair value approximates $134,285 at September
30, 2009 and $117,277 at December 31, 2008)
|
132,786
|
117,772
|
||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
628
|
348
|
||||||
Loans:
|
||||||||
Real estate construction
loans
|
47,671
|
60,798
|
||||||
Real estate mortgage
loans
|
167,589
|
162,757
|
||||||
Commercial and industrial
loans
|
268,868
|
246,218
|
||||||
Loans to
individuals
|
98,632
|
106,907
|
||||||
Total loans
|
582,760
|
576,680
|
||||||
Less unearned income and
deferred fees
|
(1,119
|
)
|
(1,123
|
)
|
||||
Loans, net of unearned income and
deferred fees
|
581,641
|
575,557
|
||||||
Less: allowance for loan
losses
|
(6,453
|
)
|
(5,858
|
)
|
||||
Loans, net
|
575,188
|
569,699
|
||||||
Bank
premises and equipment, net
|
10,734
|
11,204
|
||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
6,322
|
5,760
|
||||||
Other
real estate owned, net
|
1,944
|
1,984
|
||||||
Intangible
assets and goodwill, net
|
12,897
|
13,719
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
21,106
|
21,689
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
965,888
|
$
|
935,374
|
||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$
|
122,519
|
$
|
109,630
|
||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
277,884
|
256,416
|
||||||
Savings
deposits
|
50,241
|
45,329
|
||||||
Time
deposits
|
385,229
|
406,473
|
||||||
Total
deposits
|
835,873
|
817,848
|
||||||
Other
borrowed funds
|
46
|
54
|
||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
473
|
655
|
||||||
Other
liabilities
|
8,025
|
6,709
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
844,417
|
825,266
|
||||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock of no par value.
|
||||||||
Authorized 5,000,000
shares; none issued and outstanding
|
---
|
---
|
||||||
Common
stock of $1.25 par value.
|
||||||||
Authorized
10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding
6,933,474
shares in 2009 and 6,929,474 in 2008
|
8,667
|
8,662
|
||||||
Retained
earnings
|
113,087
|
105,356
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss), net
|
(283
|
)
|
(3,910
|
)
|
||||
Total stockholders'
equity
|
121,471
|
110,108
|
||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
965,888
|
$
|
935,374
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||
$
in thousands, except share and per share data
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||
Interest
Income
|
|||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
9,316
|
$
|
9,196
|
|||
Interest
on interest-bearing deposits
|
23
|
36
|
|||||
Interest
on securities – taxable
|
1,600
|
1,726
|
|||||
Interest
on securities – nontaxable
|
1,677
|
1,451
|
|||||
Total interest
income
|
12,616
|
12,409
|
|||||
Interest
Expense
|
|||||||
Interest
on time deposits $100,000 or more
|
1,379
|
1,323
|
|||||
Interest
on other deposits
|
2,496
|
2,865
|
|||||
Interest
on borrowed funds
|
1
|
7
|
|||||
Total interest
expense
|
3,876
|
4,195
|
|||||
Net interest
income
|
8,740
|
8,214
|
|||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
305
|
280
|
|||||
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses
|
8,435
|
7,934
|
|||||
Noninterest
Income
|
|||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
865
|
930
|
|||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
107
|
88
|
|||||
Credit
card fees
|
723
|
728
|
|||||
Trust
income
|
255
|
307
|
|||||
Bank
owned life insurance income
|
201
|
144
|
|||||
Other
income
|
76
|
87
|
|||||
Realized
securities (losses), net
|
(15
|
)
|
(76
|
)
|
|||
Total noninterest
income
|
2,212
|
2,208
|
|||||
Noninterest
Expense
|
|||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
2,784
|
2,792
|
|||||
Occupancy,
furniture and fixtures
|
450
|
437
|
|||||
Data
processing and ATM
|
380
|
355
|
|||||
FDIC
insurance
|
423
|
47
|
|||||
Credit
card processing
|
550
|
546
|
|||||
Intangibles
amortization
|
271
|
279
|
|||||
Net
costs of other real estate owned
|
29
|
52
|
|||||
Franchise
taxes
|
221
|
208
|
|||||
Other
operating expenses
|
783
|
815
|
|||||
Total noninterest
expense
|
5,891
|
5,531
|
|||||
Income
before income tax expense
|
4,756
|
4,611
|
|||||
Income
tax expense
|
976
|
996
|
|||||
Net Income
|
$
|
3,780
|
$
|
3,615
|
|||
Net income per share -
basic
|
$
|
0.55
|
$
|
0.52
|
|||
Net income per share -
diluted
|
$
|
0.54
|
$
|
0.52
|
|||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding - basic
|
6,933,474
|
6,926,974
|
|||||
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding - diluted
|
6,948,083
|
6,932,438
|
|||||
Dividends declared per
share
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
---
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
$
in thousands, except share and per share data
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Interest
Income
|
||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
28,170
|
$
|
27,682
|
||||
Interest
on interest-bearing deposits
|
73
|
426
|
||||||
Interest
on securities – taxable
|
4,766
|
5,175
|
||||||
Interest
on securities – nontaxable
|
4,896
|
4,309
|
||||||
Total interest
income
|
37,905
|
37,592
|
||||||
Interest
Expense
|
||||||||
Interest
on time deposits $100,000 or more
|
4,363
|
4,502
|
||||||
Interest
on other deposits
|
8,197
|
9,904
|
||||||
Interest
on borrowed funds
|
2
|
11
|
||||||
Total interest
expense
|
12,562
|
14,417
|
||||||
Net interest
income
|
25,343
|
23,175
|
||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
953
|
515
|
||||||
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses
|
24,390
|
22,660
|
||||||
Noninterest
Income
|
||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
2,506
|
2,502
|
||||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
263
|
250
|
||||||
Credit
card fees
|
2,060
|
2,101
|
||||||
Trust
income
|
792
|
929
|
||||||
Bank
owned life insurance income
|
554
|
446
|
||||||
Other
income
|
261
|
314
|
||||||
Realized
securities gains, net
|
55
|
189
|
||||||
Total noninterest
income
|
6,491
|
6,731
|
||||||
Noninterest
Expense
|
||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
8,409
|
8,395
|
||||||
Occupancy,
furniture and fixtures
|
1,344
|
1,328
|
||||||
Data
processing and ATM
|
1,016
|
1,033
|
||||||
FDIC
insurance
|
1,429
|
90
|
||||||
Credit
card processing
|
1,551
|
1,570
|
||||||
Intangibles
amortization
|
822
|
841
|
||||||
Net
costs of other real estate owned
|
100
|
64
|
||||||
Franchise
taxes
|
666
|
619
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
2,364
|
2,354
|
||||||
Total noninterest
expense
|
17,701
|
16,294
|
||||||
Income
before income tax expense
|
13,180
|
13,097
|
||||||
Income
tax expense
|
2,656
|
2,832
|
||||||
Net Income
|
$
|
10,524
|
$
|
10,265
|
||||
Net income per share -
basic
|
$
|
1.52
|
$
|
1.48
|
||||
Net income per share -
diluted
|
$
|
1.52
|
$
|
1.48
|
||||
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding - basic
|
6,931,672
|
6,930,133
|
||||||
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding - diluted
|
6,942,712
|
6,937,018
|
||||||
Dividends declared per
share
|
$
|
0.41
|
$
|
0.39
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
$
in thousands, except per share data
|
Common
Stock
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated
Other Compre-
hensive
Income(Loss)
|
Compre-hensive
Income
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Balances
at December 31, 2007
|
$
|
8,690
|
$
|
97,810
|
$
|
(1,700
|
)
|
$
|
104,800
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
---
|
10,265
|
---
|
$
|
10,265
|
10,265
|
||||||||||||||
Dividends
$0.39 per share
|
---
|
(2,702
|
)
|
---
|
---
|
(2,702
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
5
|
41
|
---
|
---
|
46
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on securities available for sale, net of income tax
$(1,198)
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
(2,224
|
)
|
---
|
||||||||||||||
Reclass
adjustment, net of tax $(58)
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
(108
|
)
|
---
|
||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss, net of tax $(1,256)
|
---
|
---
|
(2,332
|
)
|
(2,332
|
)
|
(2,332
|
)
|
||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$
|
7,933
|
---
|
||||||||||||||
Effect
of changing pension plan measurement date pursuant to SFAS No.
158
|
---
|
(45
|
)
|
3
|
(42
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Stock
repurchase
|
(36
|
)
|
(526
|
)
|
---
|
(562
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Balances
at September 30, 2008
|
$
|
8,659
|
$
|
104,843
|
$
|
(4,029
|
)
|
$
|
109,473
|
|||||||||||
Balances
at December 31, 2008
|
$
|
8,662
|
$
|
105,356
|
$
|
(3,910
|
)
|
$
|
110,108
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
---
|
10,524
|
---
|
$
|
10,524
|
10,524
|
||||||||||||||
Dividends
$0.41per share
|
---
|
(2,843
|
)
|
---
|
---
|
(2,843
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
5
|
50
|
---
|
---
|
55
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gains on securities available for sale, net of income tax
$1,938
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
3,600
|
---
|
|||||||||||||||
Reclass
adjustment, net of tax $15
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
27
|
---
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax $1,953
|
---
|
---
|
3,627
|
3,627
|
3,627
|
|||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$
|
14,151
|
---
|
||||||||||||||
Balances
at September 30, 2009
|
$
|
8,667
|
$
|
113,087
|
$
|
(283
|
)
|
$
|
121,471
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
$
in thousands
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
10,524
|
$
|
10,265
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Provision for loan
losses
|
953
|
515
|
||||||
Depreciation of bank
premises and equipment
|
687
|
730
|
||||||
Amortization of
intangibles
|
822
|
841
|
||||||
Amortization of premiums and
accretion of discounts, net
|
268
|
189
|
||||||
Losses on sale of disposal of
fixed assets
|
---
|
2
|
||||||
(Gains) on sales and calls of
securities available for sale, net
|
(42
|
)
|
(166
|
)
|
||||
(Gains) on calls of securities
held to maturity, net
|
(13
|
)
|
(23
|
)
|
||||
(Gains) losses on other real
estate owned
|
54
|
(5
|
)
|
|||||
Net change in:
|
||||||||
Mortgage loans held for
sale
|
(280
|
)
|
125
|
|||||
Accrued interest
receivable
|
(562
|
)
|
(290
|
)
|
||||
Other
assets
|
(1,309
|
)
|
(2,722
|
)
|
||||
Accrued interest
payable
|
(182
|
)
|
(156
|
)
|
||||
Other
liabilities
|
1,316
|
415
|
||||||
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
12,236
|
9,720
|
||||||
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
|
||||||||
Net
change interest-bearing deposits
|
6,721
|
17,430
|
||||||
Proceeds
from calls, principal payments, sales and maturities of securities
available for sale
|
19,699
|
20,409
|
||||||
Proceeds
from calls, principal payments and maturities of securities held to
maturity
|
31,929
|
19,953
|
||||||
Purchases
of securities available for sale
|
(36,542
|
)
|
(16,957
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of securities held to maturity
|
(47,024
|
)
|
(32,350
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of loan participations
|
(13
|
)
|
(369
|
)
|
||||
Collections
of loan participations
|
704
|
102
|
||||||
Loan
originations and principal collections, net
|
(7,480
|
)
|
(24,161
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from disposal of other real estate owned
|
269
|
65
|
||||||
Recoveries
on loans charged off
|
64
|
110
|
||||||
Purchase
of bank premises and equipment
|
(217
|
)
|
(194
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from disposal of bank premises and equipment
|
---
|
8
|
||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
(31,890
|
)
|
(15,954
|
)
|
||||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
|
||||||||
Net
change in other deposits
|
39,269
|
716
|
||||||
Net
change in time deposits
|
(21,244
|
)
|
8,931
|
|||||
Net
change in other borrowed funds
|
(8
|
)
|
(8
|
)
|
||||
Stocks
options exercised
|
55
|
46
|
||||||
Cash
dividends
|
(2,843
|
)
|
(2,702
|
)
|
||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
---
|
(562
|
)
|
|||||
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
15,229
|
6,421
|
||||||
Net
change in cash and due from banks
|
(4,425
|
)
|
187
|
|||||
Cash
and due from banks at beginning of period
|
16,316
|
16,324
|
||||||
Cash
and due from banks at end of period
|
$
|
11,891
|
$
|
16,511
|
||||
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
||||||||
Interest
paid on deposits and borrowed funds
|
$
|
12,744
|
$
|
14,573
|
||||
Income
taxes paid
|
$
|
3,200
|
$
|
3,034
|
7
Supplemental
Disclosure of Noncash Activities
|
||||||||
Loans
charged against the allowance for loan losses
|
$
|
422
|
$
|
409
|
||||
Loans
transferred to other real estate owned
|
$
|
283
|
$
|
834
|
||||
Unrealized
gains (losses) on securities available for sale
|
$
|
5,580
|
$
|
(3,588
|
)
|
|||
Capital
reduction due to change in pension measurement date
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
63
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
$ in
thousands, except share and per share data
Note
(1) General
The
consolidated financial statements of National Bankshares, Inc. (NBI) and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, The National Bank of Blacksburg (NBB) and National
Bankshares Financial Services, Inc. (NBFS) (collectively, the Company), conform
to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
to general practices within the banking industry. The accompanying interim
period consolidated financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion
of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which
are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements,
have been included. The results of operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of results of
operations for the full year or any other interim period. The interim
period consolidated financial statements and financial information included in
this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the notes to consolidated
financial statements included in the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K. The
Company posts all reports required to be filed under the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 on its web site at www.nationalbankshares.com.
Subsequent
events have been considered through November 9, 2009, the same date on which
these financial statements were issued.
Note
(2) Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company adopted the National Bankshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan to give key
employees of NBI and its subsidiaries an opportunity to acquire shares of NBI
common stock. The Plan terminated on March 9, 2009. The purpose of the 1999
Stock Option Plan was to promote the success of NBI and its subsidiaries by
providing an incentive to key employees that enhanced the identification of
their personal interest with the long term financial success of the Company and
with growth in stockholder value. Under the 1999 Stock Option Plan, up to
500,000 shares of NBI common stock could be granted. The 1999 Stock Option Plan
limited the maximum term of any option granted to ten years, stated that options
could be granted at not less than fair market value on the date of the grant and
contained certain other limitations on the exercisability of incentive stock
options. There were no nonvested options outstanding at September 30,
2009.
Compensation
expense is calculated using the Black-Scholes model and is amortized over the
requisite service period using the straight-line method. There have
been no grants of stock options in 2009.
Options
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2009
|
113,500
|
$
|
21.84
|
|||||||||||||
Granted
|
---
|
---
|
||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
4,000
|
13.58
|
$ 47
|
|||||||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
---
|
---
|
||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2009
|
109,500
|
$
|
22.14
|
5.74
|
$
|
362
|
||||||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2009
|
109,500
|
$
|
22.14
|
5.74
|
$
|
362
|
Because
no options have been granted in 2009 and all options were fully vested at
December 31, 2008, there is no expense included in net income.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, there were no stock options
granted. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, options for 4,000
shares of stock with an intrinsic value of $47 were exercised. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, options for 4,000 shares with an intrinsic
value of $20 were exercised.
Note
(3) Allowance for Loan Losses, Nonperforming Assets and Impaired
Loans
Nine
Months ended
September
30,
|
Year
ended
December
31,
|
|||||||||||
$
in thousands, except % data
|
2009
|
2008
|
2008
|
|||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$
|
5,858
|
$
|
5,219
|
$
|
5,219
|
||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
953
|
515
|
1,119
|
|||||||||
Loans
charged off
|
(422
|
)
|
(409
|
)
|
(611
|
)
|
||||||
Recoveries
|
64
|
110
|
131
|
|||||||||
Balance
at the end of period
|
$
|
6,453
|
$
|
5,435
|
$
|
5,858
|
||||||
Ratio
of allowance for loan losses to the end of period loans, net of unearned
income and deferred fees
|
1.11
|
%
|
0.99
|
%
|
1.02
|
%
|
||||||
Ratio
of net charge-offs to average loans, net of unearned income and deferred
fees1.
|
0.08
|
%
|
0.08
|
%
|
0.09
|
%
|
||||||
Ratio
of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans2.
|
165.97
|
%
|
271.34
|
%
|
439.46
|
%
|
1.
|
Net
charge-offs are on an annualized
basis.
|
2.
|
The
Company defines nonperforming loans as total nonaccrual and restructured
loans. Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing are
excluded.
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||
$
in thousands, except % data
|
2009
|
2008
|
2008
|
|||||||||
Nonperforming
assets:
|
||||||||||||
Nonaccrual
loans
|
$
|
3,888
|
$
|
2,003
|
$
|
1,333
|
||||||
Restructured
loans
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|||||||||
Total nonperforming
loans
|
3,888
|
2,003
|
1,333
|
|||||||||
Foreclosed
property
|
1,944
|
1,037
|
1,984
|
|||||||||
Total nonperforming
assets
|
$
|
5,832
|
$
|
3,040
|
$
|
3,317
|
||||||
Ratio
of nonperforming assets to loans, net of unearned income and deferred
fees, plus other real estate owned
|
1.00
|
%
|
0.55
|
%
|
0.57
|
%
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||
$
in thousands, except % data
|
2009
|
2008
|
2008
|
|||||||||
Loans
past due 90 days or more and still accruing
|
$
|
2,153
|
$
|
1,324
|
$
|
1,127
|
||||||
Ratio
of loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing to loans, net of
unearned income and deferred fees
|
0.37
|
%
|
0.24
|
%
|
0.20
|
%
|
||||||
Impaired
loans:
|
||||||||||||
Total
impaired loans
|
$
|
5,812
|
$
|
4,374
|
$
|
3,576
|
||||||
Impaired
loans with a valuation allowance
|
$
|
5,812
|
$
|
3,271
|
$
|
2,548
|
||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(1,718
|
)
|
(996
|
)
|
(679
|
)
|
||||||
Impaired
loans, net of allowance
|
$
|
4,094
|
$
|
2,275
|
$
|
1,869
|
||||||
Impaired
loans with no valuation allowance
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
1,103
|
$
|
1,028
|
||||||
Average
recorded investment in impaired loans
|
$
|
5,995
|
$
|
3,861
|
$
|
3,790
|
||||||
Income
recognized on impaired loans
|
$
|
137
|
$
|
124
|
$
|
140
|
||||||
Amount
of income recognized on a cash basis
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
---
|
There
were no nonaccrual loans excluded from impaired loan disclosure at September 30,
2009.
Note
(4) Securities
The
amortized costs, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair values
for securities available for sale by major security type as of September 30,
2009 are as follows:
September
30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
$
in thousands
|
Amortized
Costs
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Values
|
||||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury
|
$
|
2,021
|
$
|
156
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
2,177
|
||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies and corporations
|
42,165
|
486
|
410
|
42,241
|
||||||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
76,857
|
2,352
|
299
|
78,910
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
17,689
|
817
|
---
|
18,506
|
||||||||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
22,962
|
635
|
327
|
23,270
|
||||||||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank stock-restricted
|
92
|
---
|
---
|
92
|
||||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock-restricted
|
1,677
|
---
|
---
|
1,677
|
||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
2,790
|
---
|
206
|
2,584
|
||||||||||||
Total securities available for
sale
|
$
|
166,253
|
$
|
4,446
|
$
|
1,242
|
$
|
169,457
|
The
amortized costs, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair values
for securities held to maturity by major security type as of September 30, 2009
are as follows:
September
30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
$
in thousands
|
Amortized
Costs
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Values
|
||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies and corporations
|
$
|
29,083
|
$
|
394
|
$
|
208
|
$
|
29,269
|
||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
93,999
|
2,294
|
734
|
95,559
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
1,536
|
83
|
---
|
1,619
|
||||||||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
8,168
|
92
|
422
|
7,838
|
||||||||||||
Total securities held to
maturity
|
$
|
132,786
|
$
|
2,863
|
$
|
1,364
|
$
|
134,285
|
Information
pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous loss position,
follows:
September
30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Less
Than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
|||||||||||||||
$
in thousands
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies and corporations
|
$
|
34,556
|
$
|
618
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
---
|
||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
23,782
|
401
|
13,452
|
632
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
||||||||||||
Corporate
debt and other securities
|
---
|
---
|
10,784
|
955
|
||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired
securities
|
$
|
58,338
|
$
|
1,019
|
$
|
24,236
|
$
|
1,587
|
December
31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Less
Than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
|||||||||||||||
$
in thousands
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies and corporations
|
$
|
995
|
$
|
4
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
---
|
||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
54,480
|
2,533
|
1,000
|
2
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
1,309
|
9
|
635
|
3
|
||||||||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
13,786
|
851
|
12,046
|
3,255
|
||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
---
|
---
|
492
|
96
|
||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired
securities
|
$
|
70,570
|
$
|
3,397
|
$
|
14,173
|
$
|
3,356
|
The
Company had 110 securities with a fair value of $82,574 which were temporarily
impaired at September 30, 2009. The total unrealized loss on these
securities was $2,606. Of the temporarily impaired total, 43 securities with a
fair value of $24,236 and an unrealized loss of $1,587 have been in a continuous
loss position for twelve months or more.
A
security is impaired when its fair value is less than its amortized cost basis.
In determining that its impaired securities were temporarily, and not
other-than-temporarily, impaired at September 30, 2009, the Company considered
the following factors:
·
|
The
Company does not intend to sell any impaired
security.
|
·
|
It
is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell any
impaired security before recovering its amortized cost
basis.
|
·
|
The
amortized cost basis of each impaired security does not exceed the present
value of its expected cash flows.
|
Significant
volatility and increased risk in the financial markets have been associated with
the recent economic downturn. The increase in financial market credit risk
affects the Company in the same way as it affects other institutional and
individual investors. The Company’s investment portfolio includes corporate
bonds. If, because of economic hardships, the issuing firms were to default,
there could be a delay in the payment of interest or bond principal, or there
could be a loss of principal or interest, or both. To date, there have been no
defaults in any of the corporate bonds held in the investment portfolio. The
Company also holds a large number of municipal bonds. A prolonged and deep
recession could negatively impact the ability of states and municipalities to
make scheduled principal and interest payments on their outstanding
indebtedness. If tax revenues and other sources of income decline, states and
municipalities could default on their bonds. To date there have been no defaults
among the municipal bonds in the Company’s portfolio.
Management
regularly monitors the credit quality of the investment portfolio. Changes in
ratings are noted and follow-up research on the issuer is undertaken when
warranted. Management intends to carefully follow any changes in bond quality.
Refer to “Securities” in this report for additional information.
Note
(5) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FSP FAS
141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business
Combination That Arise from Contingencies.” FSP FAS 141(R)-1 amends
and clarifies SFAS 141(R) to address application issues on initial recognition
and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets
and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business
combination. The FSP is effective for assets and liabilities arising
from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on
or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” FSP FAS 157-4
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS
157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have
significantly decreased. The FSP also includes guidance on
identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not
orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods
ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The
Company does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 to have a material impact
on its consolidated financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1
amends SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to
require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim
reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial
statements. In addition, the FSP amends APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim
Financial Reporting,” to require those disclosures in summarized financial
information at interim reporting periods. The FSP is effective for
interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not
expect the adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 to have a material impact on
its consolidated financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2
amend other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities to make
guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of
other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities. The
FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to
other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. FSP FAS 115-2
and FAS 124-2 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15,
2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
In April
2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 111 (SAB 111). SAB 111 amends and replaces SAB Topic 5.M. in the
SAB Series entitled “Other Than Temporary Impairment of Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities.” SAB 111 maintains the SEC Staff’s
previous views related to equity securities and amends Topic 5.M. to exclude
debt securities from its scope. The Company does not expect the
implementation of SAB 111 to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In May
2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165,
“Subsequent Events.” SFAS 165 establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS
165 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 166,
“Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140.” SFAS 166 provides guidance to improve the relevance,
representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a
reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of
financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any,
in transferred financial assets. SFAS 166 must be applied as of the beginning of
the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for
interim periods within that first annual reporting period. Earlier
application is prohibited. The Company does not expect the adoption
of SFAS 166 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167,
“Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R).” SFAS 167 improves
financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest
entities. SFAS 167 will be effective as of the beginning of the first
annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim
periods within that first annual reporting period. Earlier
application is prohibited. The Company does not expect the adoption
of SFAS 167 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168,
“The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No.
162.” SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification, which will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the
Securities and Exchange Commission under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the
effective date, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered
non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become
nonauthoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements
issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The
Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 168 to have a material impact on
its consolidated financial statements.
In June
2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 112 (SAB 112). SAB 112 revises or rescinds portions of the interpretative
guidance included in the codification of SABs in order to make the interpretive
guidance consistent with current U.S. GAAP. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SAB 112 to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB issued
Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 (ASU 2009-05), “Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value.” ASU 2009-05
amends Subtopic 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall,” and
provides clarification for the fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU
2009-05 is effective for the first reporting period including interim period
beginning after issuance. The Company does not expect the adoption of
ASU 2009-05 to have a material impact on its consolidate financial
statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued
Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12 (ASU 2009-12), “Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures (Topic 820): Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net
Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).” ASU 2009-12 provides guidance on
estimating the fair value of alternative investments. ASU 2009-12 is effective
for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company does
not expect the adoption of ASU 2009-12 to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued
Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-15 (ASU 2009-15), “Accounting for Own-Share
Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other
Financing.” ASU 2009-15 amends Subtopic 470-20 to expand accounting and
reporting guidance for own-share lending arrangements issued in contemplation of
convertible debt issuance. ASU 2009-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning
on or after December 15, 2009 and interim periods within those fiscal years for
arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The Company
does not expect the adoption of ASU 2009-15 to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
13
Note
(6) Defined Benefit Plan
Components of Net Periodic
Benefit Cost:
Pension
Benefits
|
||||||||
Nine
Months ended September 30,
|
||||||||
$
in thousands
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
264
|
$
|
321
|
||||
Interest
cost
|
495
|
462
|
||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(396
|
)
|
(500
|
)
|
||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
(75
|
)
|
(75
|
)
|
||||
Amortization
of net obligation at transition
|
(9
|
)
|
(11
|
)
|
||||
Recognized
net actuarial loss
|
252
|
116
|
||||||
Net periodic benefit
cost
|
$
|
531
|
$
|
313
|
Employer
Contributions
NBI’s
required minimum pension plan contribution for 2009 is $318. The contribution is
being paid in quarterly installments.
Note
(7) Fair Value Measurements
Generally
accepted accounting principles define fair value, establish a framework for
measuring fair value, establish a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure
of fair value measurement and enhance disclosure requirements for fair value
measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs
to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three
levels are defined as follows:
·
|
Level
1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active
markets.
|
·
|
Level
2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the financial
instrument.
|
·
|
Level
3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant
to the fair value measurement.
|
Following
is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at
fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant
to the valuation hierarchy:
Securities Available for
Sale
Where
quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified
within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities would include
highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products and exchange traded equities.
If quoted market prices are not available, securities are classified within
Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy and fair values are estimated by using
pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or
discounted cash flow. Level 2 securities would include U.S. agency securities,
mortgage-backed agency securities, obligations of states and political
subdivisions and certain corporate, asset backed and other securities. In
certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs
to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation
hierarchy. Currently, all of the Company’s available for sale
securities are considered to be Level 2 securities. The Company’s restricted
investment in the equity of correspondent banks is carried at cost based in the
redemption provisions of those entities and is therefore excluded from the table
below.
14
The
following table presents the balances of financial assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30,
2009.
Fair
Value Measurements at September 30, 2009 Using
|
||||||||||||||||
$
in
thousands Description
|
Balance
as of
September
30,
2009
|
Quoted
Prices
in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
(Level
1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Available
for sale securities
|
$
|
167,688
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
167,688
|
$
|
---
|
Certain
financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in
accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually
result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs
of individual assets.
Loans Held for
Sale
Loans
held for sale are required to be measured at the lower of cost or fair value.
Market value represents fair value. Management obtains quotes or bids on all or
part of these loans directly from the purchasing financial institutions.
Premiums received or to be received on the quotes or bids are indicative of the
fact that cost is lower than fair value. At September 30, 2009, the entire
balance of loans held for sale was recorded at its cost.
Impaired
Loans
Generally
accepted accounting principles are used to determine impaired loans. Impaired
loans are measured at observable market price (if available) or at the fair
value of the loan’s collateral (if the loan is collateral dependent). Fair value
of the loan’s collateral, when the loan is dependent on collateral, is
determined by appraisal or independent valuation which is then adjusted for the
cost related to liquidation of the collateral.
The
following table summarizes the Company’s impaired loans that were measured at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period.
Carrying
Value at September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
$
in
thousands Description
|
Balance
as of
September
30,
2009
|
Quoted
Prices
in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
(Level
1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans net of valuation allowance
|
$
|
4,094
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
4,094
|
Other Real Estate
Owned
Certain
assets such as other real estate owned (OREO) are measured at fair value less
cost to sell. We believe that the fair value component in its valuation follows
generally accepted accounting principles.
The
following table summarizes the Company’s other real estate owned that was
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period.
Carrying
Value at September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
$
in
thousands Description
|
Balance
as of
September
30,
2009
|
Quoted
Prices
in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
(Level
1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
real estate owned net of valuation allowance
|
$
|
1,944
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
1,944
|
The
following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair
value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and Due from Banks,
Interest-Bearing Deposits, and Federal Funds Sold
The
carrying amounts approximate fair value.
Securities
The fair
values of securities, excluding restricted stock, are determined using the same
methodology described above for securities available for sale.
Loans Held for
Sale
Fair
values of loans held for sale are based on commitments on hand from investors or
prevailing market prices.
Loans
Fair
values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial
characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, real estate –
commercial, real estate – construction, real estate – mortgage, credit card and
other consumer loans. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and
adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming
categories.
The fair
value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows
through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that
reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan, as well as
estimates for prepayments. The estimate of maturity is based on the Company’s
historical experience with repayments for loan classification, modified, as
required, by an estimate of the effect of economic conditions on
lending.
Fair
value for significant nonperforming loans is based on estimated cash flows which
are discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the
estimated cash flows. Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows and discount
rates are determined within management’s judgment, using available market
information and specific borrower information.
Deposits
The fair
value of demand and savings deposits is the amount payable on demand. The fair
value of fixed maturity term deposits and certificates of deposit is estimated
using the rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining
maturities.
Accrued
Interest
The
carrying amount of accrued interest approximates fair value.
Other Borrowed
Funds
Other
borrowed funds, represents treasury tax and loan deposits and short-term
borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank. The carrying amount is a reasonable
estimate of fair value because the deposits are generally repaid within 120 days
from the transaction date.
Commitments to Extend Credit
and Standby Letters of Credit
The only
amounts recorded for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and
financial guarantees written are the deferred fees arising from these
unrecognized financial instruments. These deferred fees are not deemed
significant at September 30, 2009, and, as such, the related fair values have
not been estimated.
The
estimated fair values, and related carrying amounts, of the Company’s financial
instruments are as follows:
September
30, 2009
|
||||||||
$ in
thousands
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
||||||
Financial
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and due from
banks
|
$
|
11,891
|
$
|
11,891
|
||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
22,935
|
22,935
|
||||||
Securities
|
302,243
|
303,742
|
||||||
Mortgage loans held for
sale
|
628
|
628
|
||||||
Loans, net
|
575,188
|
579,215
|
||||||
Accrued interest
receivable
|
6,322
|
6,322
|
||||||
Financial
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
$
|
835,873
|
$
|
840,826
|
||||
Other borrowed
funds
|
46
|
46
|
||||||
Accrued interest
payable
|
473
|
473
|
National
Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands, except per share data)
The
purpose of this discussion and analysis is to provide information about the
financial condition and results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc. and
its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company), which are not otherwise apparent
from the consolidated financial statements and other information included in
this report. Refer to the financial statements and other information
included in this report as well as the 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for an
understanding of the following discussion and analysis.
Cautionary Statement
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
We make
forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q that are subject to significant
risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include
statements regarding our profitability, liquidity, allowance for loan losses,
interest rate sensitivity, market risk, growth strategy, and financial and other
goals, and are based upon our management’s views and assumptions as of the date
of this report. The words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,”
“projects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” or
other similar words or terms are intended to identify forward-looking
statements.
These
forward-looking statements are based upon or are affected by factors that could
cause our actual results to differ materially from historical results or from
any results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These
factors include, but are not limited to, changes in:
·
|
interest
rates,
|
·
|
general
economic conditions,
|
·
|
the
legislative/regulatory climate,
|
·
|
monetary
and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S.
Treasury, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal
Reserve Board, and the impact of any policies or programs implemented
pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) and
other financial reform legislation,
|
·
|
unanticipated
increases in the level of unemployment in the Company’s trade
area,
|
·
|
the
quality or composition of the loan and/or investment
portfolios,
|
·
|
demand
for loan products,
|
·
|
deposit
flows,
|
·
|
competition,
|
·
|
demand
for financial services in the Company’s trade
area,
|
·
|
the
real estate market in the Company’s trade
area,
|
·
|
the
Company’s technology initiatives,
and
|
·
|
applicable
accounting principles, policies and
guidelines.
|
These
risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking
statements contained in this report. We caution readers not to place undue
reliance on those statements, which speak only as of the date of this
report.
This
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the description of
our “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Since the
Fall of 2008, when there were historic disruptions in the American financial
system, there has been a severe global recession.
17
Many
economists believe that the recession in the United States, which has been
described as the worst since the 1930’s, has now ended. However, there is no
agreement as to the speed of the economic recovery, and most economists believe
that unemployment is likely to increase before beginning to
decline.
The
Company was not negatively impacted during the initial phase of the recession.
Its markets were not affected by the dramatic declines in real estate values
seen in other areas of the country. In addition, the diverse economy in the
Company’s market area, including several large employers that are public
educational institutions, have to date helped to insulate the Company’s trade
area from the worst effects of the recession. If the economic recovery is long
and slow, unemployment may rise, resulting in a higher rate of delinquent loans
and an increase in real estate foreclosures. Higher unemployment, as well as the
fear of layoffs, also results in reduced consumer demand for goods and services,
which negatively impacts the Company’s business and professional
customers.
A slow
economic recovery could have an adverse effect on all financial institutions,
including the Company.
Critical Accounting
Policies
General
The
discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations is based in large part upon its consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). These accounting
principles are complex and require management to apply significant judgment to
various accounting, reporting, and disclosure matters. Management must use
assumptions, judgments and estimates when applying these principles where
precise measurements are not possible or practical. These policies are
critical because they are highly dependent upon subjective or complex judgments,
assumptions and estimates. Changes in these judgments, assumptions or
estimates may have a significant impact on the consolidated financial
statements. Actual results, in fact, could differ from initial
estimates.
The
accounting policies with the greatest uncertainty and that require our most
difficult, subjective or complex judgments and the greatest likelihood that
materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions, or
using different assumptions, are our allowance for loan losses and our
accounting for core deposit intangibles, both of which are described
below.
Allowance for Loan
Losses
The
allowance for loan losses is our best estimate of the losses that may be
sustained in our loan portfolio. The allowance is based on and calculated in
compliance with two basic principles of accounting. The first principle requires
that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and are estimable.
The second accounting principle requires that losses be accrued based on the
differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows
or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan
balance.
Our
allowance for loan losses has three basic components: the formula allowance, the
specific allowance and the unallocated allowance. Each of these components is
determined based upon estimates that can and do change when the actual events
occur. The formula allowance uses a historical loss view as an indicator of
future losses and, as a result, could differ from the loss incurred in the
future. However, since this history is updated with the most recent loss
information, the errors that might otherwise occur are mitigated. The specific
allowance uses various techniques to arrive at an estimate of loss. Historical
loss information, expected cash flows and fair market value of collateral are
used to estimate these losses. The use of these values is inherently subjective,
and our actual losses could be greater or less than the estimates. The
unallocated allowance captures losses that are attributable to various economic
events and to industry or geographic sectors whose impact on the portfolio have
occurred but have yet to be recognized either in the formula or in the specific
allowance.
We strive
to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level, which in management’s
judgment, is sufficient to absorb the credit losses that are inherent in the
loan portfolio.
Core Deposit
Intangibles
Following
generally accepted accounting principles, the Company annually utilizes an
independent consulting firm to conduct an assessment of impairment of goodwill
and core deposit intangibles. Additionally, acquired intangible assets (such as
core deposit intangibles) are separately recognized if the benefit of the asset
can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged and amortized over its
estimated useful life. Any intangible asset arising from a branch acquisition
transaction is subject to amortization over its estimated useful
life.
The
Company evaluated the acquisitions that generated the intangible assets on the
consolidated balance sheets in the amount of $9,958 and $10,912 at December 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively, in light of changes in generally accepted
accounting principles which became effective at that time and which remain in
effect. These changes required a different accounting treatment of intangible
assets that are a part of a transaction in which a separate business enterprise
is acquired. The Company determined that those acquisitions did not constitute
the acquisition of a business and therefore continues to amortize the intangible
assets.
Overview
National
Bankshares, Inc. (NBI) is a financial holding company incorporated under the
laws of Virginia. Located in Southwest Virginia, NBI has two wholly-owned
subsidiaries, The National Bank of Blacksburg (NBB) and National Bankshares
Financial Services, Inc. (NBFS). The National Bank of Blacksburg, which does
business as National Bank from twenty-five office locations, is a community
bank. NBB is the source of nearly all of the Company’s revenue. National
Bankshares Financial Services, Inc. does business as National Bankshares
Investment Services and National Bankshares Insurance Services. Income from NBFS
is not significant at this time, nor is it expected to be so in the near
future.
National
Bankshares, Inc. common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market and is
traded under the symbol “NKSH.” On June 29, 2009, National Bankshares, Inc. was
included in the Russell Investments Russell 3000 and Russell 2000 Indexes. The
Russell 3000 Index, which is reconstituted annually, is made up of the 3,000
largest U.S. Companies, as calculated using market capitalization. The Russell
2000 is the subset of the Russell 3000 that represents the small cap portion of
the Index. Inclusion in the Russell Index may help raise awareness of the
Company among institutional investors and the investment community.
Performance
Summary
The
following table shows NBI’s key performance ratios for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and year ended December 31, 2008.
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||||||
Return
on average assets
|
1.45
|
%
|
1.51
|
%
|
||||
Return
on average equity
|
12.20
|
%
|
12.52
|
%
|
||||
Net
interest margin (1)
|
4.13
|
%
|
4.12
|
%
|
||||
Noninterest
margin (2)
|
1.55
|
%
|
1.46
|
%
|
||||
Basic
net earnings per share
|
$
|
1.52
|
$
|
1.96
|
||||
Fully
diluted net earnings per share
|
$
|
1.52
|
$
|
1.96
|
(1)
|
Net
interest margin: Year-to-date tax-equivalent net interest income divided
by year-to-date average earning
assets.
|
(2)
|
Noninterest
margin: Noninterest income (excluding securities gains and losses) less
noninterest expense (excluding the provision for bad debts and income
taxes) divided by average year-to-date
assets.
|
The
return on average assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 1.45%,
a decline of 6 basis points from 1.51% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
decline is the result of internally generated asset growth increasing at a
faster rate than earnings. The return on average equity declined from 12.52% for
the year ended December 31, 2008 to 12.20% for the nine months ended September
30, 2009. Return on average equity declined because the Company’s equity, mostly
from retained earnings, grew at a faster rate than earnings. As discussed below,
higher costs for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Deposit Insurance Fund
premiums had a negative effect on the Company’s earnings for the first nine
months in 2009. The total of FDIC premiums for the three quarters of 2009 was
$1,429, as compared with $90 for the same period of 2008. In the third quarter
of 2009, the total of FDIC premiums was $423, as compared with $47 in the third
quarter of 2008. The net interest margin, at a healthy 4.13%, was 1 basis point
higher than the 4.12% at year-end.
Although
the net interest margin of 4.13% at September 30, 2009 remained healthy and
underlying earnings were strong, the Company’s earnings for the third quarter of
2009 continued to be negatively affected by a significant increase in Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation Deposit Insurance Fund premiums. A special
assessment which was accounted for in the second quarter of 2009 and payable on
September 30, 2009, was imposed to increase the Deposit Insurance Fund’s reserve
ratio, which has been impacted by an increased number of bank failures. Earlier
in 2009 the FDIC proposed imposing an additional special assessment or
assessments in late 2009 or early 2010. However, on September 29, 2009, the
Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation proposed an
alternative strategy to strengthen the Deposit Insurance Fund. The FDIC
promulgated a rule that would require institutions to prepay their estimated
quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of
2010, 2011 and 2012. The rule is not yet final, but, if adopted, the Company has
sufficient liquidity to make the required payments without a material impact on
its business.
Growth
The
following table shows the Company’s key growth indicators:
September
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
Percent
Change
|
||||||||
Securities
|
$
|
302,243
|
$
|
264,999
|
14.05
|
%
|
||||
Loans,
net
|
575,188
|
569,699
|
0.96
|
%
|
||||||
Deposits
|
835,873
|
817,848
|
2.20
|
%
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
965,888
|
935,374
|
3.26
|
%
|
19
Securities,
deposits and total assets all grew in the first nine months of 2009. Net loans
remained essentially the same as at December 31, 2008. Growth in deposits came
from municipalities and also from individual customers, as they sought safety of
principal and avoided more volatile market investments. The low interest rate
environment also limited the attractiveness of alternative investment
vehicles.
Asset
Quality
Key asset
quality indicators are shown below:
September
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||
Nonperforming
loans
|
$
|
3,888
|
$
|
1,333
|
||||
Loans
past due 90 days or more
|
2,153
|
1,127
|
||||||
Other
real estate owned
|
1,944
|
1,984
|
||||||
Allowance
for loan losses to loans
|
1.11
|
%
|
1.02
|
%
|
||||
Net
charge-off ratio
|
0.08
|
%
|
0.09
|
%
|
Nonperforming
loans at September 30, 2009, all of which were nonaccrual loans, were $3,888, or
0.67% of loans net of unearned income and deferred fees, plus other real estate
owned. Nonperforming loans increased by $2,555 over the $1,333 reported on
December 31, 2008. Loans past due 90 days or more at the end of the third
quarter of 2009 were $2,153, up $1,026 from the total at year-end and were 0.37%
of loans net of unearned income at September 30, 2009. Although the totals of
nonperforming loans and loans past due 90 days or more have grown when compared
with year-end, the ratios of both to total loans remained low when compared with
peers and are consistent with the Company’s conservative underwriting policies.
The Company anticipates further increases in nonperforming and past due loans as
its market area is impacted by the effects of the slow economy. Exposure to loss
is somewhat mitigated because a significant percentage of loans are
collateralized with real estate.
The
Company has dedicated sufficient resources to monitoring the quality of the loan
portfolio and to working out problem assets. Management is monitoring changes
and indicators of risk in the loan portfolio. Throughout 2009, the Company has
steadily increased the allowance for loan losses to account for the increase in
nonperforming loans and the higher risk in the loan portfolio that accompanies a
recessionary environment. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to loans
increased from 1.02% at December 31, 2008 to 1.11% at September 30, 2009. The
net charge-off ratio, at 0.08% on September 30, 2009 declined by 1 basis point
from the prior year-end. Additional information about the factors used in
calculating the allowance for loan losses is presented in Note (3) “Allowance
for Loan Losses Nonperforming Assets and Impaired Loans”.
Net Interest
Income
Net
interest income for the nine months of 2009 was $25,343, an increase of $2,168,
or 9.4%, when compared with the same period in 2008. This net increase is
attributable to a decrease of $1,855 in interest expense and an increase in
interest income of $313. As compared with the first nine months of 2008, the
lower interest rate environment in the first three quarters of 2009 caused the
Company’s yield on earning assets to decline. However, a higher volume of
earning assets resulted in the $2,168 increase in total interest income for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. Despite an increase in total deposits when
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 are compared, as noted above, total
interest expense dropped by $1,855. This decline is attributable to a
combination of lower interest rates and the Company’s prudent deposit
pricing.
The
amount of net interest income earned is affected by various
factors. These include changes in market interest rates due to the
Federal Reserve Board’s monetary policy, as well as the level and composition of
the earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Company has some
ability to respond to interest rate movements and reduce volatility in the net
interest margin. However, the frequency and magnitude of changes in market
interest rates are difficult to predict, and these changes may have a greater
impact on net interest income than any adjustments by management.
Interest
rates continue at historic lows, and low and stable interest rates benefit the
Company. Offsetting the effect of low interest rates is the fact that some
higher yielding securities in the Company’s investment portfolio have been
called and been replaced with securities yielding a lower market
rate.
The
primary source of funds used to support the Company’s interest-earning assets is
deposits. Deposits are obtained in the Company’s trade area through traditional
marketing techniques. Other funding sources, such as the Federal Home Loan Bank,
while available, are only occasionally used. The cost of funds is dependent on
interest rate levels and competitive factors. This limits the ability of the
Company to react to interest rate movements.
If
interest rates remain low and stable, management anticipates that there will be
less pressure on the net interest margin as management is able to price loans
and deposits rationally. When interest rates eventually rise, the net interest
margin will narrow, because deposit rates will increase at a faster rate than
loan rates. If interest rates rise slowly, the negative effect on the net
interest margin would be less pronounced.
Provision and Allowance for
Loan Losses
The
provision for loan losses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 was
$953. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans at the end of
the third quarter of 2009 was 1.11%, which compares to 1.02% at December 31,
2008. The net charge-off ratio was 0.08% at September 30, 2009 and 0.09% at
December 31, 2008.
During
the third quarter of 2009, management added to the provision for loan losses in
an amount it believes is prudent, given current economic conditions. Refer to
the “Critical Accounting Policies” section of this report for more information
related to the methodology used to establish the Allowance for Loan Losses. At
September 30, 2009, the total of impaired loans was $5,812. The majority of the
impaired loans have unliquidated collateral associated with them. The specific
allowance for loan losses attributable to impaired loans was $1,718 at the end
of the third quarter. Especially in this uncertain economic environment, loan
quality indicators are closely monitored, and management regularly evaluates the
sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses.
Noninterest
Income
Nine
Months ended
|
|||||||||||
September
30, 2009
|
September
30, 2008
|
Percent
Change
|
|||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
$
|
2,506
|
$
|
2,502
|
0.16
|
%
|
|||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
263
|
250
|
5.20
|
%
|
|||||||
Credit
card fees
|
2,060
|
2,101
|
(1.95
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
Trust
fees
|
792
|
929
|
(14.75
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
Bank-owned
life insurance income
|
554
|
446
|
24.22
|
%
|
|||||||
Other
income
|
261
|
314
|
(16.88
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
Realized
securities gains
|
55
|
189
|
(70.90
|
)
|
%
|
Service
charges on deposit accounts totaled $2,506 for the nine months ended September
30, 2009. This is a small increase of $4, or 0.16%, when compared with the same
period of 2008. This category is affected by the number of deposit accounts, the
level of service charge fees and the number of checking account
overdrafts.
Other
service charges and fees includes charges for official checks, income from the
sale of checks to customers, safe deposit rent, fees for letters of credit and
the income earned from commission on the sale of credit life, accident and
health insurance. These fees were $263 for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, up by 5.20% from $250 for the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
Credit
card fees for the first nine months of 2009 were $2,060. This was a decrease of
$41, or 1.95%, when compared with the $2,101 total reported for the same period
last year. The decline was due to a lower volume of merchant transaction fees
and credit card fees.
Trust
fees, at $792, were down by $137, or 14.75%, from the $929 earned in the third
quarter of 2008. Trust income varies depending on the number of Trust accounts,
the types of accounts under management and financial market conditions. The
decline in Trust fees is attributable to a combination of all three factors. The
financial markets declined significantly during 2008 and early 2009, negatively
affecting income. In addition, there are fewer accounts under management. The
mix of account types also affected Trust fees during the quarter.
Noninterest
income from bank-owned life insurance increased $108, or 24.22%, to $554 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase is due to an additional
purchase of insurance in mid-2008.
Other
income is income that cannot be classified in another category. Some examples
include net gains from the sales of fixed assets, rent from foreclosed
properties and revenue from investment and insurance sales. Other income for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $261. This represents a decrease of
$53, or 16.88%, when compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
There was a $13 gain from the sale of repossessed automobiles in the first nine
months of 2008 that was not repeated in the same period in 2009, and income from
commissions for the sale of securities in NBFS has declined by $27 when the two
periods are compared.
During
the first quarter of 2008, the Company recognized $290 in a one-time gain from
the initial public offering of Visa, Inc. When the credit card processor went
public, the Company was required to sell a portion of its Class B shares. This
gain, offset by losses in called investment securities, was the source of the
relative high level of realized securities gains for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. Realized securities gains for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 were $55, as compared with $189 for the same period in 2008.
Realized securities gains in 2009 have come solely from gains in called
securities.
21Noninterest
Expense
Nine
Months ended
|
|||||||||||
September
30, 2009
|
September
30, 2008
|
Percent
Change
|
|||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
$
|
8,409
|
$
|
8,395
|
0.17
|
%
|
|||||
Occupancy,
furniture and fixtures
|
1,344
|
1,328
|
1.20
|
%
|
|||||||
Data
processing and ATM
|
1,016
|
1,033
|
(1.65
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
FDIC
insurance
|
1,429
|
90
|
1,478.78
|
%
|
|||||||
Credit
card processing
|
1,551
|
1,570
|
(1.21
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
Intangibles
amortization
|
822
|
841
|
(2.26
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
Net
costs of other real estate owned
|
100
|
64
|
56.25
|
%
|
|||||||
Franchise
taxes
|
666
|
619
|
7.59
|
%
|
|||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
2,364
|
2,354
|
0.42
|
%
|
Salary
and benefits expense increased only $14, or 0.17%, from $8,395 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to $8,409 for the nine months ended September
30, 2009. The Company has made an effort to control salary costs.
Occupancy,
furniture and fixtures expense was $1,344 for the nine months ended September
30, 2009, an increase of $16, or 1.20%, from the same period last year. The
small increase reflects the Company’s emphasis on containing controllable
expenses. On June 30, 2009, NBB consolidated its Fincastle branch office in
Tazewell, Virginia with a nearby office.
Data
processing and ATM expense was $1,016 for the first nine months ended September
30, 2009, a decrease of $17, or 1.65%, from the nine months ended September 30,
2008. During the first three quarters of 2008, the Company had higher data
processing costs associated with branch capture and merchant capture
projects.
As
previously discussed, when September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009 are
compared, there was a significant increase in premiums for the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation Deposit Insurance Fund. The total for the first nine
months last year was $90. This compares with $1,429 for the same period in 2009.
The increase is a combination of an FDIC special assessment of five basis points
of total NBB assets less Tier 1 Capital on June 30, 2009, and a higher level of
regular quarterly premiums.
Credit
card processing expense was $1,551 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
a decrease of $19, or 1.21%, from the total for the nine months ended September
30, 2008. This expense is driven by volume and other factors such as merchant
discount rates and is subject to a degree of variability.
The
expense for intangibles and goodwill amortization is related to acquisitions.
There were no acquisitions in the past year, and certain expenses have been
fully amortized. This accounts for the 2.26% decline, from $841 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to $822 for the nine months ended September 30,
2009.
Net costs
of other real estate owned have increased from $64 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 to $100 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This
expense category varies with the number of other real estate owned properties
and the expenses associated with each, and it has increased in 2009 as the total
of other real estate owned has grown. Management anticipates that the total of
other real estate owned will continue to increase as the slow economy impacts
borrowers.
Bank
franchise taxes have grown 7.59%, from $619 at September 30, 2008 to $666 at the
end of the third quarter of 2009. State bank franchise taxes are based upon
total equity, which has grown when compared with September 30,
2008.
The
category of other operating expenses includes noninterest expense items such as
professional services, stationery and supplies, telephone costs, postage and
charitable donations. Other operating expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 were $2,364. This was a nominal increase of $10, or 0.42%,
when compared with the same period in 2008.
Balance
Sheet
Year-to-date
daily averages for the major balance sheet categories are as
follows:
Assets
|
September
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
Percent
Change
|
||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
$
|
38,706
|
$
|
21,440
|
80.53
|
%
|
|||||
Securities
available for sale
|
166,446
|
157,291
|
5.82
|
%
|
|||||||
Securities
held to maturity
|
131,888
|
124,076
|
6.30
|
%
|
|||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
901
|
386
|
133.42
|
%
|
|||||||
Real
estate construction loans
|
54,477
|
56,063
|
(2.83
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
Real
estate mortgage loans
|
165,120
|
148,816
|
10.96
|
%
|
|||||||
Commercial
and industrial loans
|
255,789
|
225,806
|
13.28
|
%
|
|||||||
Loans
to individuals
|
101,876
|
108,908
|
(6.46
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
972,363
|
899,462
|
8.10
|
%
|
22
Liabilities
and stockholders’ equity
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$
|
113,541
|
$
|
112,608
|
0.83
|
%
|
|||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
279,391
|
243,409
|
14.78
|
%
|
|||||||
Savings
deposits
|
48,377
|
45,796
|
5.64
|
%
|
|||||||
Time
deposits
|
407,946
|
381,961
|
6.80
|
%
|
|||||||
Other
borrowings
|
50
|
297
|
(83.16
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
115,337
|
107,963
|
6.83
|
%
|
Securities
The total
amortized cost of securities available for sale and securities held to maturity
at September 30, 2009 was $299,039, and total fair value was $303,742. At
September 30, 2009 the Company held individual securities with a total fair
value of $82,574 that had a total unrealized loss of $2,606. Of this
total, securities with a fair value of $24,236 and unrealized loss of $1,587
have been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more. At
September 30, 2009, there were no securities that management determined to be
other than temporarily impaired.
Management
regularly monitors the quality of the securities portfolio, and management
closely follows the uncertainty in the economy and the volatility of financial
markets. The value of individual securities will be written down if
the decline in fair value is considered to be other than temporary based upon
the totality of circumstances.
Loans
September
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
Percent
Change
|
|||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
$
|
47,671
|
$
|
60,798
|
(21.59
|
)
|
%
|
||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
167,589
|
162,757
|
2.97
|
%
|
|||||||
Commercial
and industrial
|
268,868
|
246,218
|
9.20
|
%
|
|||||||
Loans
to individuals
|
98,632
|
106,907
|
(7.74
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
Total
loans
|
$
|
582,760
|
$
|
576,680
|
1.05
|
%
|
The
Company’s total loans increased slightly from $576,680 at year-end 2008 to
$582,760 at September 30, 2009. The $6,080, or 1.05%, increase is the result of
growth in the real estate mortgage and commercial and industrial loans
categories, partially offset by declines in the real estate construction and
loans to individual categories.
Commercial
and industrial loans have grown by the greatest percentage, when the four
categories of loans are compared. At December 31, 2008 the total of commercial
and industrial loans, which includes commercial real estate loans, was $246,218,
and at September 30, 2009, the total increased by $22,650, or 9.20%, to
$268,868. The growth in commercial and industrial loans partially explains the
$13,127, or 21.59%, decline in the total of real estate construction loans, from
$60,798 at December 31, 2008 to $47,671 at September 30, 2009. Several
commercial construction projects were completed during the first nine months of
2009, and real estate construction loans were converted to permanent financing
and then migrated to the commercial and industrial loans category. The economic
downturn and the unwillingness of customers to begin new projects have also
contributed to the drop in real estate construction loan totals at September 30,
2009. A substantial majority of the Company’s commercial and industrial loans
are commercial real estate loans. The collateral securing these loans is diverse
in nature and includes college student housing, motels, medical and other
professional offices and retail buildings.
Real
estate mortgage loans, at $167,589, have experienced a $4,832, or 2.97%,
increase, when totals at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 are
compared.
The 7.74%
decline in loans to individuals continues a trend that has been evident over the
past several years. The availability of low cost dealer auto loans and other
products, such as home equity lines of credit, make traditional consumer
installment loans less attractive to customers. Loans to individuals totaled
$98,632 at September 30, 2009. This compares with $106,907 at year-end
2008.
Loan
demand overall slowed during the second quarter and third quarters of 2009, as
both business and individual consumers appeared hesitant to borrow in an
uncertain economic environment. This trend may continue until there are positive
signs of a sustained recovery.
The
Company does not now nor has it ever, offered certain types of higher-risk loans
such as subprime loans, option ARM products or loans with initial teaser
rates.
Deposits
September
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
Percent
Change
|
|||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$
|
122,519
|
$
|
109,630
|
11.76
|
%
|
|||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
277,884
|
256,416
|
8.37
|
%
|
|||||||
Saving
deposits
|
50,241
|
45,329
|
10.84
|
%
|
|||||||
Time
deposits
|
385,229
|
406,473
|
(5.23
|
)
|
%
|
||||||
Total
deposits
|
$
|
835,873
|
$
|
817,848
|
2.20
|
%
|
Total
deposits have increased by 2.20%, from $817,848 at December 31, 2008 to $835,873
at September 30, 2009. The growth was internally generated and was not the
result of acquisitions. Each of the deposit categories has grown since year-end,
with the exception of time deposits. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits grew by
11.76%, from $109,630 at December 31, 2008 to $122,519 at September 30, 2009.
Interest-bearing demand deposits experienced a $21,468, or 8.37%, increase when
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 totals are compared. Savings deposits
were at $50,241 at the end of the third quarter of 2009, up by 4,912, or 10.84%,
over the $45,329 at year-end 2008. Because customers did not wish to tie up
their funds in a low interest rate environment, time deposits declined by
$21,244, or 5.23%, from $406,473 at December 31, 2008 to $385,229 at September
30, 2009. A portion of the increase in total deposits is attributable to a
higher level of municipal deposits. Many customers are also seeking the safety
of insured deposits when other forms of investments are uncertain and
volatile.
Liquidity
Liquidity
measures the Company’s ability to provide sufficient cash flow to meet its
financial commitments, to fund additional loan demand and to handle withdrawals
of existing deposits. Sources of liquidity include deposits, loan principal and
interest repayments, sales, calls and maturities of securities and short-term
borrowing. The Company has other available sources of liquidity. They include
lines of credit with a correspondent bank, advances from the Federal Home Loan
Bank, and Federal Reserve Bank discount window borrowings.
Net cash
provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
was $12,236, which compares to $9,720 for the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
Net cash
used in investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
$31,890, compared to $15,954 for the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
Net cash
provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
was $15,229, compared to $6,421 provided by financing activities in the same
period last year.
NBB has
been able to readily attract deposits at reasonable rates, particularly from
local governments in its market area. NBB has long had an internal policy
targeting the loan to deposit ratio in the 65% to 75% range. At September 30,
2009, it was 69.58%. In addition, management maintains a reasonable percentage
of the laddered investment portfolio in investments that are categorized as
available for sale. These factors, together with those cited above, contribute
to the Company’s sound levels of liquidity.
At
September 30, 2009, management is unaware of any commitment or trend that would
have a material effect on liquidity.
Capital
Resources
Total
stockholders’ equity at September 30, 2009 was $121,471, an increase of $11,363,
or 10.32%, from the $110,108 December 31, 2008. The Tier I and Tier II
risk-based capital ratios at September 30, 2009 were 16.40% and 17.37%,
respectively. Capital levels remain significantly above the regulatory minimum
capital requirements of 4.0% for Tier I and 8.0% for Tier II
capital.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
In the
normal course of business, NBB extends lines of credit to its customers. Amounts
drawn upon these lines vary at any given time depending on the business needs of
the customers. Standby letters of credit are also issued to NBB’s customers.
There are two types of standby letters of credit. The first is a guarantee of
payment to facilitate customer purchases. The second type is a performance
letter of credit that guarantees a payment if the customer fails to perform a
specific obligation. While it would be possible for customers to draw in full on
approved lines of credit and letters of credit, historically this has not
occurred. In the event of a sudden and substantial draw on these lines, the
Company has its own lines of credit on which it can draw funds. A sale of loans
or available for sale securities would also be an option.
NBB sells
mortgages on the secondary market for which there are recourse agreements should
the borrower default.
There
were no material changes in these off-balance sheet arrangements during the nine
months of 2009, except for regular and normal seasonal fluctuations in loan
commitment totals.
Contractual
Obligations
The
Company had no capital lease or purchase obligations and no long-term debt at
September 30, 2009. Operating lease obligations were not material at the end of
the third quarter of 2009 and have not changed materially from that which was
disclosed in the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K.
The
Company considers interest rate risk to be a significant market risk and has
systems in place to measure the exposure of net interest income to adverse
movement in interest rates. Interest rate shock analyses provide management with
an indication of potential economic loss due to future rate changes. There have
not been any changes which would significantly alter the results disclosed as of
December 31, 2008 in the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K.
The
Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness
of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that
evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are
effective as of September 30, 2009 to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management,
including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, the Company believes that no
system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues have been detected.
Other
Information
There are
no pending or threatened legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or to which the property of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries is subject that, in the opinion of management, may materially
impact the financial condition of the Company.
Please
refer to the “Risk Factors” previously disclosed in Item 1A of our 2008 Annual
Report on Form 10-K and the factors discussed under “Cautionary Statement
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Part I. Item 2 of this Form
10-Q.
The
Company did not repurchase stock during the third quarter of 2009.
There
were none for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
There
were none for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Subsequent
Events
From
September 30, 2009, the balance sheet date of this Form 10-Q, through the date
of filing the Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November
9, 2009, there have been no material subsequent events that 1) provide
additional evidence about conditions that existed on the date of the balance
sheet, or 2) provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of
the balance sheet, but arose after the balance sheet date.
See Index
of Exhibits.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
NATIONAL
BANKSHARES, INC.
DATE:
November 9, 2009
|
/s/
JAMES G. RAKES
|
James
G. Rakes
President
and
Chief
Executive Officer
(Authorized
Officer)
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
DATE:
November 9, 2009
|
/s/
DAVID K. SKEENS
|
David
K. Skeens
Treasurer
and
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
Page
No. in
Sequential
System
|
3(i)
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation of National Bankshares,
Inc.
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Form 8K for filed on March 16,
2006)
|
3(ii)
|
Amended
By-laws of National Bankshares, Inc.
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Annual Report on Form 10K for
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007)
|
4(i)
|
Specimen
copy of certificate for National Bankshares, Inc. common
stock
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4(a) of the Annual Report on Form 10K for
fiscal year ended December 31, 1993)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
National
Bankshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Form S-8, filed as Registration
No. 333-79979 with the Commission on June 4,
1999)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Executive
Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2008, between National Bankshares,
Inc. and James G. Rakes
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Employee
Lease Agreement dated August 14, 2002, between National Bankshares, Inc.
and The National Bank of Blacksburg
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10 (iii) (A) of Form 10Q for the period
ended September 30, 2002)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Executive
Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2008, between National Bankshares,
Inc. and F. Brad Denardo
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Executive
Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2008, between National Bankshares,
Inc. and Marilyn B. Buhyoff
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Salary
Continuation Agreement dated February 8, 2006, between The National Bank
of Blacksburg and James G. Rakes
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on February
8, 2006)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Salary
Continuation Agreement dated February 8, 2006, between The National Bank
of Blacksburg and F. Brad Denardo
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on February
8, 2006)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
Salary
Continuation Agreement dated February 8, 2006, between
National
Bankshares, Inc. and Marilyn B. Buhyoff
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on February
8, 2006)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
First
Amendment, dated December 19, 2007, to The National Bank of Blacksburg
Salary Continuation Agreement for James G. Rakes
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on December
19, 2007)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
First
Amendment, dated December 19, 2007, to The National Bank of Blacksburg
Salary Continuation Agreement for F. Brad Denardo
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on December
19, 2007)
|
*10(iii)(A)
|
First
Amendment, dated December 19, 2007, to National Bankshares, Inc. Salary
Continuation Agreement for Marilyn B. Buhyoff
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on December
19, 2007)
|
*10(viii)(A)
|
Second
Amendment, dated June 12, 2008, to The National Bank of Blacksburg Salary
Continuation Agreement for F. Brad Denardo
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Form 8K filed on June 12,
2008)
|
*10(viii)(A)
|
Second
Amendment, dated December 17, 2008, to The National Bank of Blacksburg
Salary Continuation Agreement for James G. Rakes
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
*10(viii)(A)
|
Second
Amendment, dated December 17, 2008, to The National Bank of Blacksburg
Salary Continuation Agreement for Marilyn B. Buhyoff
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
*10(viii)(A)
|
Third
Amendment, dated December 17, 2008, to The National Bank of Blacksburg
Salary Continuation Agreement for F. Brad Denardo
|
(incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(A) of the Annual Report on Form 10K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
31(i)
|
Section
906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
(included
herewith)
|
31(ii)
|
Section
906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
(included
herewith)
|
32(i)
|
18
U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
(included
herewith)
|
32(ii)
|
18
U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
(included
herewith)
|
* Indicates
a management contract or compensatory plan.
Exhibit
31(i)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, James
G. Rakes, certify that:
1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Bankshares,
Inc.;
2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date:
November 9, 2009
/s/ JAMES G.
RAKES
James G.
Rakes
President
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
Exhibit
31(ii)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, David
K. Skeens, certify that:
|
1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Bankshares,
Inc.;
|
2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date:
November 9, 2009
/s/ DAVID K.
SKEENS
David K.
Skeens
Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
Exhibit
32 (i)
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In
connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, I, James G. Rakes, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:
(1) such
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
(2) the
information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.
/s/ JAMES G.
RAKES
James G.
Rakes
President
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
Exhibit
32 (ii)
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In
connection with the Form 10-Q of National Bankshares, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, I, David K. Skeens, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) of National Bankshares, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:
(1) such
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
(2) the
information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of National Bankshares, Inc.
/s/ DAVID K.
SKEENS
David K.
Skeens
Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
(Principal
Accounting Officer)