NATIONAL RESEARCH CORP - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-29466
National Research Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Wisconsin | 47-0634000 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
1245 Q Street Lincoln, Nebraska |
68508 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (402) 475-2525
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class
Common Stock, $.001 par value
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act.) Yes o No þ
Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant at June 30,
2008: $43,936,203.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $.001 par value, outstanding as of March 30, 2009: 6,660,746 shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by
reference into Part III.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
1 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
45 | ||||||||
45 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
49 | ||||||||
52 | ||||||||
Exhibit 21.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 23.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 |
i
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Business
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain matters discussed below in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements
intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as
such because the context of the statements include phrases such as the Company believes,
expects or other words of similar import. Similarly, statements that describe the Companys
future plans, objectives or goals are also forwarding-looking statements. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or
outcomes to differ materially from those currently anticipated. Factors that could affect actual
results or outcomes include, without limitation, the factors set forth in Risk Factors.
Shareholders, potential investors, and other readers are urged to consider these and other factors
in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included are only made as of the date
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update such
forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
General
National Research Corporation (NRC or the Company) believes it is a leading provider of ongoing
survey-based performance measurement, improvement services and governance education to the
healthcare industry in the United States and Canada. The Company believes it has achieved this
leadership position based on 28 years of industry experience and its relationships with many of the
industrys largest payers and providers. The Company addresses the growing needs of healthcare
providers and payers to measure the care outcomes, specifically experience and health status, of
their patients and/or members. NRC develops tools that enable healthcare organizations to obtain
performance measurement information necessary to comply with industry and regulatory standards, and
to improve their business practices so that they can maximize new member and/or patient attraction,
experience, member retention and profitability.
Since its founding 28 years ago in 1981 as a Nebraska corporation (the Company reincorporated in
Wisconsin in September 1997), NRC has focused on the information needs of the healthcare industry.
The Companys primary types of information services are renewable performance tracking services,
custom research, subscription-based governance information and educational services, and a
renewable syndicated service.
While performance data has always been of interest to healthcare providers and payers, such
information has become increasingly important to these entities as a result of regulatory, industry
and competitive requirements. In recent years, the healthcare industry has been under significant
pressure from consumers, employers and the government to reduce costs. However, the same parties
that demanded cost reductions are now concerned that healthcare service quality is being
compromised under managed care. This concern has created a demand for consistent, objective
performance information by which healthcare providers and payers can be measured and compared, and
on which physicians compensation can, in part, be based.
The NRC Solution
The Company addresses healthcare organizations growing need to track their performance at the
enterprise-wide, departmental and physician/caregiver levels. The Company has been developing
tools designed to enable its clients to collect, in an unobtrusive manner, a substantial amount of
comparative performance information in order to analyze and improve their practices to maximize new
member and/or patient attraction, experience, member retention and profitability. NRCs performance assessments offer a
tangible measurement of health service quality of the type currently demanded by consumers,
employers, industry accreditation organizations and lawmakers.
1
Table of Contents
The Companys solutions are designed to respond to managed cares redefined relationships among
consumers, employers, payers and providers. Instead of relying exclusively on static,
mass-produced questionnaires, NRC utilizes a dynamic data collection process to create a
personalized questionnaire which evaluates service issues specific to each respondents healthcare
experience. The flexibility of the Companys data collection process allows healthcare
organizations to add timely, market-driven questions relevant to matters such as industry
performance mandates, employer performance guarantees and internal quality improvement initiatives.
In addition, the Company assesses core service factors relevant to all healthcare respondent
groups (patients, members, employers, employees, physicians, residents, families, etc.) and to all
service points of a healthcare system (inpatient, emergency room, outpatient, home health,
rehabilitation, behavioral health, long-term care, hospice, assisted living, dental, etc.).
NRC offers renewable performance tracking and improvement services, custom research,
subscription-based educational services, and a renewable syndicated service, the NRC Healthcare
Market Guide (Market Guide). The Company has renewable performance tracking tools, including
those produced and delivered under its NRC Picker trade name, for gathering and analyzing data from
survey respondents on an ongoing basis with comparisons over time. These tools may be coupled with
the improvement tool, eToolKit, to help clients not only measure performance, but know where to
focus with ideas and solutions for making improvements. The Company has the capacity to measure
performance beyond the enterprise-wide level. It has the ability and experience to determine key
performance indicators at the department and individual physician/caregiver measurement levels,
where the Companys services can best guide the efforts of its clients to improve quality and
enhance their market position. The educational services of NRC Picker provide a way of bridging
the gap between measurement and improvement. Additional offerings under the Companys Payer
Solutions division include functional disease-specific and health status measurement tools. The
syndicated Market Guide, a stand-alone market information and competitive intelligence source, as
well as a comparative performance database, allows the Companys clients to assess their
performance relative to the industry, to access best practice examples, and to utilize competitive
information for marketing purposes.
Through its division known as The Governance Institute (TGI), NRC offers subscription-based
governance information and educational conferences designed to improve the effectiveness of
hospital and healthcare systems by continually strengthening their boards, medical leadership, and
management performance in the United States. TGI conducts timely conferences, produces
publications, videos, white papers, and research studies, and tracks industry trends showcasing the
best practices of healthcare boards across the country.
On December 19, 2008, the Company acquired My InnerView, Inc. (MIV), a leading provider of
quality and performance improvement solutions to the senior care profession. MIV offers resident,
family and employee satisfaction measurement and improvement products to the long-term care,
assisted and independent living markets in the United States. MIV works with over 8,000 senior
care providers throughout the United States, housing what the Company believes is, the largest
dataset of senior care satisfaction metrics in the nation.
Growth Strategy
The Company believes that it can continue to grow through (1) expanding the depth and breadth of
its current clients performance tracking services programs, since healthcare organizations are
increasingly interested in gathering performance information at deeper levels of their
organizations and from more of their constituencies, (2) increasing the cross-selling of its
complementary services, including subscription-based governance information, (3) adding new clients
through penetrating the sizeable portion of the healthcare industry which is not yet conducting
performance assessments beyond the enterprise-wide level or is not yet
outsourcing this function, and (4) pursuing acquisitions of, or investments in, firms providing
products, services or technologies which complement those of the Company.
2
Table of Contents
Information Services
The Qualisys System (Qualisys) is NRCs data collection process which provides ongoing, renewable
performance tracking and is the platform of the Companys online tools. This performance tracking
program efficiently coordinates and centralizes an organizations satisfaction monitoring, thereby
establishing a uniform methodology and survey instrument needed to obtain valid performance
information and improve quality. Using the industry method of mail and/or telephone-based data
collection, this assessment process monitors the patients or stakeholders experience across
healthcare respondent groups (patients, members, employers, employees, physicians, etc.) and
service settings (inpatient, emergency room, outpatient, etc.). Rather than be limited to only
static, mass-produced questionnaires which provide limited flexibility and performance insights,
NRCs proprietary software generates individualized questionnaires, including personalization such
as patient name, treating caregiver name, encounter date and, in some cases, the services received.
To enhances the response rates and the relevance of performance data to be flexible and
responsive to healthcare organizations changing information needs, NRC creates personalized
questionnaires which evaluate service issues specific to each respondents healthcare experience
and includes questions which address core service factors throughout a healthcare organization.
Unlike some of its competitors, which use multiple questionnaires often sent to the same
respondents, the Company gathers data through one questionnaire, the contents of which are selected
from the Companys library of questions after a clients needs are determined. As a result, the
Companys renewable performance tracking programs and data collection processes (1) realize higher
response rates, obtain data more efficiently, and thereby provide healthcare organizations with
more feedback, (2) eliminate over surveying (where one respondent receives multiple surveys), and
(3) allow healthcare organizations to adapt questionnaire content to address management objectives
and to assess quality improvement programs or other timely marketplace issues.
The Company recognizes that performance programs must do more than just measure the experiences;
they must measure and facilitate improvement. The Company offers solutions designed to effectively
measure and improve the most important aspects of the patients experience. By combining the
measurement and improvement technology of Qualisys with the philosophy and family of surveys of the
Picker Institute, eToolKit is designed to allow clients to actually act on their research results
and attain improvement in the care delivery process. The Company has developed online improvement
tools including a one-page reporting format called Action Plan, which provides a basis on which
improvements can be made. NRC Action Plans show healthcare organizations which service factors
impact their customer groups value, which have the greatest impact on satisfaction levels and how
their performance in relationship to these key indicators changes over time. The Company has also
developed online access to performance results, which the Company believes provides NRCs clients
the fastest and easiest way to access measurement results. NRCs exclusive web-based electronic
delivery system, eReports, provides clients the ability to review results and reports online,
independently analyze data, query data sets, customize a number of reports and distribute reports
electronically.
3
Table of Contents
Market Guide serves as a stand-alone market information and competitive intelligence source, as
well as a comparative performance database. Market Guide is the largest consumer-based assessment
of consumers perceptions of, and satisfaction with, hospitals and health systems in more than 250
markets across the country, representing the views of more than 300,000 households across nearly
every county in the continental United States. Market Guide provides comprehensive assessments,
including consumer quality perceptions, product-line preferences, service use and visit
satisfaction for more than 3,200 hospitals and health systems. More than 250 data items relevant
to healthcare payers, providers and purchasers are reported in the Market Guide, including hospital
quality and image ratings, hospital selection factors,
household preventative health behaviors, presence of chronic conditions, and contemporary issues
such as healthcare internet utilization. Clients can purchase customized versions specific to
their local service areas, with the ability to benchmark performance results to over 250 metro
areas, 48 states or nationally. Market Guide is delivered to clients via NRCs exclusive web-based
electronic delivery system, which features easy to use graphs, charts and various report formats
for multiple users within the clients organization. Another feature of the web-based system is a
national name search, which is designed to allow a healthcare organization with a national or
regional presence to simultaneously compare the performance of all its sites, and pinpoint where
strengths and weaknesses exist. Clients who have renewed for multiple years of the study may
utilize the systems trending capability, which details how the performance of the healthcare
organization changes over time. The proprietary Market Guide data results are also used to produce
reports which are customized to meet the specific information needs of existing clients, as well as
new healthcare markets beyond the Companys traditional client base.
Through TGI, the Company offers subscription-based membership services. The information and
education services are provided for the boards of directors and medical leadership of hospital and
healthcare systems. These services are sold and delivered in the form of a twelve-month
subscription membership and include accredited leadership conference and educational programs,
customized research reports, board advisory services, videos, books, policy guidelines, board
self-assessment tools, white papers, newsletters and fax surveys. The Companys leadership
conferences are available to all prospective members by paying the applicable conference fee. The
Company also sells publications, periodicals, reference books and associated videos through its
resource catalog.
Clients
The Companys ten largest clients accounted for 24%, 29%, and 32% of the Companys total revenue in
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs accounted for 7%, 8%
and 8% of total revenue in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Approximately 8%, 9% and 8% of the
Companys revenues were derived from foreign customers in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Sales and Marketing
The Company generates the majority of its revenue from client renewals, supplemented by its
internal marketing efforts and a direct sales force. Sales associates direct NRCs sales efforts
from Nebraska, Wisconsin and California in the United States and from Toronto in Canada. As
compared to the typical industry practice of compensating sales people with relatively high base
pay and a relatively small sales commission, NRC compensates its sales associates with relatively
low base pay and a relatively high per-sale commission. The Company believes this compensation
structure provides incentives to its sales associates to surpass sales goals and increases the
Companys ability to attract top quality sales associates.
Numerous marketing efforts support the direct sales forces new business generation and project
renewal initiatives. NRC conducts an annual direct marketing campaign around scheduled trade
shows, including leading industry conferences. NRC uses this lead generation mechanism to track
the effectiveness of marketing efforts and add generated leads to its database of current and
potential client contacts. Finally, the Companys public relations program includes (1) an ongoing
presence in leading industry trade press and in the mainstream press, (2) public speaking at
strategic industry conferences, (3) fostering relationships with key industry constituencies and
(4) the annual Consumer Choice Award program recognizing top-ranking hospitals in more than 200
markets.
The Companys integrated marketing activities facilitate its ongoing receipt of project
requests-for-proposals, as well as direct sales force initiated prospect contacts. The sales
process typically spans a 120-day period encompassing the identification of a healthcare
organizations information needs, the education of prospects
on NRC solutions (via proposals and in-person sales presentations), and the closing of the sale.
The Companys sales cycle varies depending on the particular service being marketed and the size of
the potential project. The subscription-based services typically have a shorter sales cycle.
4
Table of Contents
Competition
The healthcare information and market research industry is highly competitive. The Company has
traditionally competed with healthcare organizations internal marketing, market research and/or
quality improvement departments which create their own performance measurement tools, and with
relatively small specialty research firms which provide survey-based healthcare market research
and/or performance assessment. The Companys main competitors among such specialty firms are Press
Ganey, which NRC believes has revenue that is significantly larger than the Companys revenue, and
three or four other companies who NRC believes have revenue smaller than the Companys revenue.
The Company, to a certain degree, currently competes with, and anticipates that in the future it
may increasingly compete with, (1) traditional market research firms which are significant
providers of survey-based, general market research and (2) firms which provide services or products
that complement healthcare performance assessments, such as healthcare software or information
systems. Although only a few of these competitors have to date offered survey-based, healthcare
market research that competes directly with the Companys services, many of these competitors have
substantially greater financial, information gathering and marketing resources than the Company and
could decide to increase their resource commitments to the Companys market. There are relatively
few barriers to entry into the Companys market, and the Company expects increased competition in
its market, which could adversely affect the Companys operating results through pricing pressure,
increased marketing expenditures and market share losses, among other factors. There can be no
assurance that the Company will continue to compete successfully against existing or new
competitors.
The Company believes the primary competitive factors within its market include quality of service,
timeliness of delivery, service uniqueness, credibility of provider, industry experience and price.
NRC believes that its industry leadership position, exclusive focus on the healthcare industry,
dynamic questionnaire, syndicated products, accredited leadership conferences, educational
programs, comparative performance database, and relationships with leading healthcare payers and
providers position the Company to compete in this market.
Intellectual Property and Other Proprietary Rights
The Companys success depends in part upon its data collection processes, research methods, data
analysis techniques and internal systems, and procedures that it has developed specifically to
serve clients in the healthcare industry. The Company has no patents. Consequently, it relies on
a combination of copyright and trade secret laws and associate nondisclosure agreements to protect
its systems, survey instruments and procedures. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by
the Company to protect its rights will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of such rights or
that third parties will not independently develop functionally equivalent or superior systems or
procedures. The Company believes that its systems and procedures and other proprietary rights do
not infringe upon the proprietary rights of third parties. There can be no assurance, however,
that third parties will not assert infringement claims against the Company in the future or that
any such claims will not result in protracted and costly litigation, regardless of the merits of
such claims or whether the Company is ultimately successful in defending against such claims.
Associates
As of December 31, 2008, the Company employed a total of 260 persons on a full-time basis. In
addition, as of such date, the Company had 71 part-time associates primarily in its survey
operations, representing approximately 47 full-time equivalent associates. None of the Companys
associates are represented by a collective bargaining unit. The Company considers its relationship
with its associates to be good.
5
Table of Contents
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth certain information, as of March 1, 2009, regarding the executive
officers of the Company:
Name | Age | Position | ||||
Michael D. Hays
|
54 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||||
Patrick E. Beans
|
51 | Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director | ||||
Jona S. Raasch
|
50 | President of The Governance Institute, a division of National Research Corporation |
Michael D. Hays has served as Chief Executive Officer and a director since he founded the
Company in 1981. He was appointed to the additional role of President of the Company in July 2008,
a position in which he also served from 1981 to 2004. Prior to founding the Company, Mr. Hays
served for seven years as a Vice President and a director of SRI Research Center, Inc. (n/k/a the
Gallup Organization).
Patrick E. Beans has served as Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and a director since 1997. He has served as the principal financial officer since he
joined the Company in August 1994. From June 1993 until joining the Company, Mr. Beans was the
finance director for the Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission, a five-state
compact developing a low-level radioactive waste disposal plan. From 1979 to 1988 and from June
1992 to June 1993, he practiced as a certified public accountant.
Jona S. Raasch has served as President of The Governance Institute, a division of National
Research Corporation, since May 2006. Prior to May 2006, Ms. Raasch held various positions with
the Company since September 1988, most recently as Vice President and Chief Operations Officer from
September 1997 to May 2006. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Raasch held various positions with
A.C. Nielsen Corporation.
Executive officers of the Company are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Companys Board
of Directors. There are no family relationships between any directors or executive officers of
NRC.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider each of the risks described below, together with all of the other
information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, before making an investment decision with
respect to our securities. If any of the following risks develop into actual events, our business,
financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and you may
lose all or part of your investment.
We rely on a limited number of key clients, and a loss of one or more of these key clients will
adversely affect our operating results.
We rely on a limited number of key clients for a substantial portion of our revenue. The Companys
ten largest clients accounted for 24%, 29%, and 32% of the Companys total revenue in 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs accounted for 7%, 8% and 8% of
total revenue in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
We cannot assure you that we will maintain our existing client base, maintain or increase the level
of revenue or profits generated by our existing clients, or be able to attract new clients.
Furthermore, the healthcare industry continues to undergo consolidation and we cannot assure you that such consolidation will
not cause us to lose clients. The loss of one or more of our large clients or a significant
reduction in business from such clients, regardless of the reason, will have a negative effect on
our revenue and a corresponding effect on our operating and net income. See Risk Factors -
Because our clients are concentrated in the healthcare industry, we may be adversely affected by a
business downturn or consolidation with respect to the healthcare industry.
6
Table of Contents
We depend on performance tracking contract renewals for a large share of our revenue and our
operating results could be adversely affected.
We expect that a substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future will continue to be
derived from written and oral contracts for renewable performance tracking services. Substantially
all such written contracts are renewable annually at the option of our clients, although a client
generally has no minimum purchase commitment under a contract and the contracts are generally
cancelable on short or no notice without penalty. To the extent that clients fail to renew or
defer their renewals from the quarter we anticipate, our quarterly results may be materially
adversely affected. Our ability to secure renewals depends on, among other things, our ability to
gather and analyze performance data in a consistent, high-quality and timely fashion. In addition,
the performance tracking and market research activities of our clients are affected by
accreditation requirements, enrollment in managed care plans, the level of use of satisfaction
measures in healthcare organizations overall management and compensation programs, the size of
operating budgets, clients operating performance, industry and economic conditions, and changes in
management or ownership. As these factors are beyond our control, we cannot assure you that we
will be able to maintain our renewal rates. Any material decline in renewal rates from existing
levels would have an adverse effect on our revenue and a corresponding effect on our operating and
net income.
Our operating results may fluctuate on a quarterly basis, and this may cause our stock price to
decline.
Our operating results have fluctuated from period to period in the past and will likely fluctuate
significantly in the future due to various factors. There has historically been fluctuation in our
financial results related to the Market Guide, a stand-alone market information intelligence source
and comparative performance database. In the future, we expect such fluctuations will continue,
but to a lesser degree. Until May 2008, the Market Guides were deliverable on an annual basis, and
historically we recognized revenue when they were delivered to the principal customers pursuant to
their contracts, typically in the third quarter of the year. Substantially all of the related
costs were deferred and subsequently charged to direct expenses contemporaneously with the
recognition of the revenue. Starting in May of 2008, the Market Guide became deliverable on a
monthly basis. Accordingly, we now recognize much of the Market Guide revenue ratably over a
twelve-month period and, since October of 2008, all of the related costs are expensed in the month
they are incurred. We will continue to have some annual sales which could increase fluctuation of
operating results in the third quarter. A delay in completing and delivering the Market Guide, the
timing of which is dependent upon our ability to access a third-partys respondent panel on a
timely basis, could delay recognition of such revenue and expenses, which could materially affect
operating results for the affected periods. We generate additional revenue from incidental
customers subsequent to the completion of each monthly edition. Revenue and costs for these
subsequent services are recognized as the services are performed and completed.
In addition, our overall operating results may fluctuate as a result of a variety of other factors,
including the size and timing of orders from clients, client demand for our services (which, in
turn, is affected by factors such as accreditation requirements, enrollment in managed care plans,
operating budgets and clients operating performance), the hiring and training of additional staff,
postal rate changes, and industry and general economic conditions. Because a significant portion
of our overhead, particularly some costs associated with owning and occupying our building and
full-time personnel expenses, is fixed in the short-term, our results of operations may be materially adversely affected in any particular quarter if
revenue falls below our expectations. These factors, among others, make it possible that in some
future quarter our operating results may be below the expectations of securities analysts and
investors, which would have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
7
Table of Contents
We operate in a highly competitive market and we could experience increased price pressure and
expenses as a result.
The healthcare information and market research industry is highly competitive. We compete with
healthcare organizations internal marketing, market research and/or quality improvement
departments that create their own performance measurement tools, and with relatively small
specialty research firms that provide survey-based healthcare market research and/or performance
assessment. Our main competitors among such specialty firms are Press Ganey, which we believe has
revenue that is significantly larger than our revenue, and three or four other companies that we
believe have revenue that is smaller than our revenues. We, to a certain degree, currently compete
with, and we anticipate that in the future we may increasingly compete with, traditional market
research firms that are significant providers of survey-based, general market research and firms
that provide services or products that complement healthcare performance assessments, such as
healthcare software or information systems. Although only a few of these competitors have to date
offered survey-based, healthcare market research that competes directly with our services, many of
these competitors have substantially greater financial, information gathering and marketing
resources than we do and could decide to increase their resource commitments to our market. There
are relatively few barriers to entry into our market, and we expect increased competition in our
market, which could adversely affect our operating results through pricing pressure, increased
client service and marketing expenditures and market share losses, among other factors. We cannot
assure you that we will continue to compete successfully against existing or new competitors, and
our revenue and operating net income could be adversely affected as a result.
Because our clients are concentrated in the healthcare industry, our revenue and operating results
may be adversely affected by a business downturn or consolidation with respect to the healthcare
industry.
Substantially all of our revenue is derived from clients in the healthcare industry. As a result,
our business, financial condition and results of operations are influenced by conditions affecting
this industry, including changing political, economic, competitive and regulatory influences that
may affect the procurement practices and operation of healthcare providers and payers. Many
federal and state legislators have proposed or have announced that they intend to propose programs
to reform portions of the U.S. healthcare system. These programs could result in lower
reimbursement rates and otherwise change the environment in which providers and payers operate. In
addition, large private purchasers of healthcare services are placing increasing cost pressure on
providers. Healthcare providers may react to these cost pressures and other uncertainties by
curtailing or deferring purchases, including purchases of our services. Moreover, there has been
consolidation of companies in the healthcare industry, a trend which we believe will continue.
Consolidation in this industry, including the potential acquisition of certain of our clients,
could adversely affect aggregate client budgets for our services, or could result in the
termination of a clients relationship with us. The impact of these developments on the healthcare
industry is difficult to predict and could have an adverse effect on our revenue and a
corresponding effect on our operating and net income.
8
Table of Contents
Our future success depends on our ability to manage our growth, including identifying acquisition
candidates and effectively integrating acquired companies.
Since our inception, our growth has placed significant demands on our management, administrative,
operational and financial resources. In order to manage our growth, we will need to continue to
implement and improve our operational, financial and management information systems and continue to
expand, motivate and effectively manage an evolving workforce. If our management is unable to
effectively manage under such circumstances, the quality of our services, our ability to retain key personnel and our
results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Furthermore, we cannot assure you
that our business will continue to expand. Reductions in clients spending on performance tracking
and market research, increased competition, pricing pressures and other general economic and
industry trends could adversely affect our growth.
We may achieve a portion of our future revenue growth, if any, through acquisitions of
complimentary businesses, products, services or technologies, although we currently have no
commitments or agreements with respect to any such acquisitions. Our management has limited
experience dealing with the issues of product and service, systems, personnel and business strategy
integration posed by acquisitions, and has encountered minor problems with integrating people and
processes in connection with past acquisitions. We cannot assure you that the integration of any
possible future acquisitions will be managed without incurring higher than expected costs and
expenses. In addition, we cannot assure you that, as a result of such unexpected costs and
expenses, any possible future acquisition will not negatively affect our operating and net income.
We face several risks relating to our ability to collect the data on which our business relies.
Our ability to provide timely and accurate performance tracking and market research to our clients
depends on our ability to collect large quantities of high quality data through surveys and
interviews. If receptivity to our survey and interview methods by respondents declines, or for
some other reason their willingness to complete and return surveys declines, or if we, for any
reason, cannot rely on the integrity of the data we receive, then our revenue could be adversely
affected, with a corresponding effect on our operating and net income. In addition, we currently
rely primarily on mail and telephone surveys for gathering information. If one or more of our
competitors were to develop an online survey process that more effectively and efficiently gathers
information, then we would be at a competitive disadvantage and our revenue could be adversely
affected, with a corresponding effect on our operating and net income.
We also rely on a third-party panel of pre-recruited consumer households to produce in a timely
manner, the Market Guide. If we are not able to continue to use this panel, or the time period in
which we use this panel is altered and we cannot find an alternative panel on a timely, cost
competitive basis, we could face an increase in our costs or an inability to effectively produce
the Market Guide. In either case, our operating and net income would be negatively affected.
Our principal shareholder effectively controls our company.
Michael D. Hays, our President and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned 72.7% of our
outstanding common stock as of March 30, 2009. As a result, he is able to control matters
requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of significant
corporate matters such as change of control transactions. The effects of such influence could be
to delay or prevent a change of control of our company unless the terms are approved by Mr. Hays.
9
Table of Contents
Our business and operating results could be adversely affected if we are unable to attract or
retain key managers and other personnel.
Our future performance will depend, to a significant extent, upon the efforts and ability of our
key personnel who have expertise in gathering, interpreting and marketing survey-based performance
information for healthcare markets. Although client relationships are managed at many levels
within our company, the loss of the services of Michael D. Hays, our President and Chief Executive
Officer, or one or more of our other senior managers could have a material adverse effect, at least
in the short to medium term, on most significant aspects of our business, including strategic
planning, product development, and sales and customer relations. As of December 31, 2008, we
maintained $500,000 of key officer life insurance on Mr. Hays. Our success will also depend on our ability to hire, train and retain skilled personnel in
all areas of our business. Currently, we do not have employment agreements with our officers or
our other key personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense, and many
of the companies that compete with us for qualified personnel have substantially greater financial
and other resources than us. Furthermore, we expect competition for qualified personnel to become
more intense as competition in our industry increases. We cannot assure you that we will be able
to recruit, retain and motivate a sufficient number of qualified personnel to compete successfully.
If intellectual property and other proprietary information technology were copied or independently
developed by our competitors, our operating results could be negatively affected.
Our success depends in part upon our data collection process, research methods, data analysis
techniques, and internal systems and procedures that we have developed specifically to serve
clients in the healthcare industry. We have no patents. Consequently, we rely on a combination of
copyright, trade secret laws and associate nondisclosure agreements to protect our systems, survey
instruments and procedures. We cannot assure you that the steps we have taken to protect our
rights will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of such rights, or that third parties will not
independently develop functionally equivalent or superior systems or procedures. We believe that
our systems and procedures and other proprietary rights do not infringe upon the proprietary rights
of third parties. We cannot assure you, however, that third parties will not assert infringement
claims against us in the future, or that any such claims will not result in protracted and costly
litigation, regardless of the merits of such claims, or whether we are ultimately successful in
defending against such claims.
Errors in, or dissatisfaction with, performance tracking and other surveys could adversely affect
our business.
Many healthcare providers, payers and other entities or individuals use our renewable performance
tracking and other healthcare surveys in promoting and/or operating their businesses, and as a
factor in determining physician or employee compensation. Consequently, any errors in the data
received or in the final surveys, as well as the actual results of such surveys, can have a
significant impact on such providers, payers or other entities businesses, and on any such
individuals compensation. In addition, parties who have not performed well in our surveys may be
dissatisfied with the results of the surveys or the manner in which the results may be used by
competitors or others. Although any such errors or dissatisfaction with the results of the
surveys, or the manner in which the surveys have been used, has not resulted in litigation against
us, we cannot assure you that we will not face future litigation, which may be costly, as a result
of a healthcare providers, payers, other entitys or individuals allegation of errors in our
surveys or dissatisfaction with the results thereof.
Regulatory developments could adversely affect our revenue and results of operations.
In the operation of our business, we have access to, or gather certain confidential information,
such as medical histories of our respondents. As a result, we could be subject to potential
liability for any inappropriate disclosure or use of such information. Even if we do not
improperly disclose confidential information, privacy laws, including the U.S. Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, the U.S. Patriot Act and Canadian legislation relating
to personal health information, have had, and could in the future have, the effect of increasing
our costs and restricting our ability to gather and disseminate information which could ultimately
have a negative effect on our revenue.
In addition, several years ago, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services initiated a
nationwide effort to collect and publicly report hospital quality data, including the patient
experience of care questionnaire. This questionnaire is called the HCAHPS questionnaire and was
developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. After several years of development
and consensus building, the HCAHPS survey program began in 2006. This survey program may increase competition and pricing pressures, which
could adversely affect our operating and net income.
10
Table of Contents
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
The Company has no unresolved staff comments to report pursuant to this item.
Item 2. Properties
The Companys headquarters is located in an owned office building in Lincoln, Nebraska, of which
62,000 square feet are used for the Companys operations. This facility houses all the
capabilities necessary for NRCs survey programming, printing and distribution, data processing,
analysis and report generation, marketing, and corporate administration. The Companys Canadian
office is located in a rented 2,600 square foot office building in Markham, Ontario. The
operations of TGI are located in San Diego, California, where the Company leases 6,100 square feet
of office space. MIVs operations are located in Wausau, Wisconsin, and Minnetonka, Minnesota,
where the Company leases 8,500 and 1,300 square feet of office space, respectively.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Company is not subject to any material pending litigation.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of the Companys shareholders during the fourth quarter of the
Companys 2008 fiscal year.
11
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. | Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities |
The Companys Common Stock, $.001 par value (Common Stock), is traded on the NASDAQ Market under
the symbol NRCI. The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices for, and
dividends declared on, the Common Stock for the period from January 1, 2007, through December 31,
2008:
Dividends | ||||||||||||
Declared Per | ||||||||||||
High | Low | Common Share | ||||||||||
2007 Quarter Ended: |
||||||||||||
March 31 |
$ | 24.24 | $ | 20.49 | $ | .12 | ||||||
June 30 |
$ | 27.00 | $ | 21.24 | $ | .12 | ||||||
September 30 |
$ | 26.50 | $ | 24.47 | $ | .12 | ||||||
December 31 |
$ | 28.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | .12 | ||||||
2008 Quarter Ended: |
||||||||||||
March 31 |
$ | 27.94 | $ | 24.75 | $ | .14 | ||||||
June 30 |
$ | 32.06 | $ | 25.14 | $ | .14 | ||||||
September 30 |
$ | 35.58 | $ | 23.01 | $ | .14 | ||||||
December 31 |
$ | 34.93 | $ | 19.00 | $ | .14 |
On March 30, 2009, there were approximately 19 shareholders of record and approximately 500
beneficial owners of the Common Stock.
In March 2005, the Company announced the commencement of a quarterly cash dividend. Cash dividends
of $3.8 and $3.3 million in the aggregate were declared and paid during the twelve-month periods
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The payment and amount of future dividends is at
the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors and will depend on the Companys future
earnings, financial condition, general business conditions and other factors.
The table below summarizes the Companys repurchases of its common stock during the three-month
period ended December 31, 2008.
Total Number | ||||||||||||||||
of Shares | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Purchased as Part | Maximum Number of | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | of Publicly | Shares that May Yet Be | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Announced Plans | Purchased Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Per Share | or Programs(1) | Programs | ||||||||||||
October 1 October 31, 2008 |
2,504 | $ | 27.82 | 2,504 | 391,961 | |||||||||||
November 1 November 30,
2008 |
2,010 | $ | 23.65 | 2,010 | 389,951 | |||||||||||
December 1 December 31,
2008 |
97,358 | $ | 26.36 | 97,358 | 292,593 |
(1) | In February 2006, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock
repurchase plan providing for the repurchase of an additional 750,000 shares. The plan
has no expiration date. |
12
Table of Contents
The graph below compares the Companys cumulative five-year total shareholder return on common
stock with the cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ Composite Index and the Russell 2000 Index.
The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in the Companys common stock and in each of
the indexes (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from December 31, 2003, to December 31, 2008.
The Russell 2000 Index is an index of companies with market capitalizations similar to the Company.
The Company has selected this index because, at this time, the Company does not believe it can
reasonably identify a peer group for comparison. The Company believes that an index of companies
with similar market capitalizations provides a reasonable basis for comparing total shareholder
returns.
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future
stock price performance.
* | Based on $100 invested on December 31, 2003, in stock of the Company or the index, including
reinvestment of all dividends. |
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN DATA
12/03 | 12/04 | 12/05 | 12/06 | 12/07 | 12/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
National Research Corporation |
100.00 | 100.25 | 109.62 | 146.39 | 177.49 | 194.16 | ||||||||||||||||||
NASDAQ Composite |
100.00 | 110.08 | 112.88 | 126.51 | 138.13 | 80.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Russell 2000 |
100.00 | 118.33 | 123.72 | 146.44 | 144.15 | 95.44 |
13
Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The selected statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and the
selected balance sheet data at December 31, 2008 and 2007, are derived from, and are qualified by
reference to, the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected statement of income data for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the balance sheet data at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, are
derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included herein. The Company has made
acquisitions and adopted SFAS No. 123R Share-Based Payment during the five years covered by
the selected statement financial data. See Note 2 and Note 8 to the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statement of Income Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 51,013 | $ | 48,923 | $ | 43,771 | $ | 32,437 | $ | 29,683 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Direct expenses |
23,611 | 21,801 | 19,445 | 13,642 | 12,869 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
12,728 | 13,173 | 12,158 | 8,617 | 7,394 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,685 | 2,583 | 2,260 | 1,762 | 2,018 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
39,024 | 37,557 | 33,863 | 24,021 | 22,281 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
11,989 | 11,366 | 9,908 | 8,416 | 7,402 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expenses) |
(6 | ) | (248 | ) | (402 | ) | 99 | (119 | ) | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
11,983 | 11,118 | 9,506 | 8,515 | 7,283 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,538 | 4,278 | 3,622 | 3,279 | 2,732 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,445 | $ | 6,840 | $ | 5,884 | $ | 5,236 | $ | 4,551 | ||||||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 1.11 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.63 | ||||||||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 1.09 | $ | 0.98 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.63 | ||||||||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.56 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.32 | $ | | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
basic |
6,685 | 6,850 | 6,836 | 7,038 | 7,181 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
diluted |
6,831 | 7,011 | 6,954 | 7,118 | 7,249 |
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Working capital |
$ | (10,650 | ) | $ | (2,384 | ) | $ | (1,482 | ) | $ | 8,058 | $ | 19,434 | |||||||
Total assets |
72,145 | 61,869 | 61,532 | 44,675 | 47,954 | |||||||||||||||
Total debt, including current portion |
12,954 | 2,993 | 11,093 | 1,471 | 4,901 | |||||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
38,598 | 42,286 | 36,751 | 32,593 | 35,018 |
14
Table of Contents
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
Overview
The Company believes it is a leading provider of ongoing survey-based performance measurement,
analysis, tracking, improvement services and governance education to the healthcare industry in the
United States and Canada. Since 1981, the Company has provided these services using traditional
market research methodologies, such as direct mail, telephone-based surveys, focus groups and
in-person interviews. Since 2002, the current primary data collection methodology used is direct
mail, but the Company still uses other methodologies for certain types of studies. The Company
addresses the growing need of healthcare providers and payers to measure the care outcomes,
specifically experience and health status of their patients and/or members, and provides
information on governance issues. NRC develops tools that enable healthcare organizations to
obtain performance measurement information necessary to comply with industry and regulatory
standards, and to improve their business practices so that they can maximize new member and/or
patient attraction, experience, member retention and profitability. The Company believes that a
driver of its growth and the growth of its industry will be the increase in demand for performance
measurement, improvement and educational services as a result of more public reporting programs.
The Companys primary types of information services are performance tracking services, custom
research, subscription-based educational and improvement services, and its Market Guide.
Acquisitions
On December 19, 2008, the Company acquired My InnerView, Inc. (MIV), a leading provider of
quality and performance improvement solutions to the senior care profession. MIV offers resident,
family and employee satisfaction measurement and improvement products to the long-term care,
assisted and independent living markets in the United States. MIV works with over 8,000 senior
care providers throughout the United States, housing what the Company
believes is, the largest
dataset of senior care satisfaction metrics in the nation. The consideration paid at closing for
MIV included payment of $11,500,000 in cash and $440,000 of direct expenses capitalized as purchase
price. The merger agreement under which the Company acquired MIV provided for contingent earn-out
payments not included in these amounts.
On April 1, 2008, approximately 10 customer contracts were purchased from SQ Strategies for
$249,473. The recording of this asset purchase increased customer related intangibles by $260,462
and deferred revenue by $10,989.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect amounts reported therein. The most significant of these areas involving difficult or
complex judgments made by management with respect to the preparation of the Companys consolidated
financial statements for fiscal year 2008 include:
| Revenue recognition; |
||
| Valuation of long-lived assets; |
||
| Valuation of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets; and |
||
| Income taxes. |
15
Table of Contents
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives a majority of its operating revenue from its annually renewable services, which
include performance tracking services, subscription-based educational services and Market Guide.
The Company provides interim and annual performance tracking to its clients under annual client
service contracts, although such contracts are generally cancelable on short or no notice without
penalty. The Company provides subscription-based educational services to clients generally under
annual service contracts over a twelve-month period and publishes healthcare market information for
its clients through its Market Guide. Starting in May 2008, the Company began providing Market
Guide subscription-based services to clients on a monthly basis generally over a twelve-month
period, however, some Market Guides will continue to be sold and delivered on an annual basis. The
Company also derives revenues from its custom and other research projects.
The Companys performance tracking services are performance tracking and improvement tools for
gathering and analyzing data from survey respondents. Such services are provided pursuant to
contracts which are generally renewable annually, and that provide for a customer-specific study
which is conducted via a series of surveys and delivered via a series of updates or reports, the
timing and frequency of which vary by contract (such as monthly or weekly). These contracts are
generally cancelable on short or no notice without penalty and, since progress on these contracts
can be tracked and regular updates and reports are made, clients are entitled to any
work-in-process, but are obligated to pay for all services performed through cancellation.
Typically, these contracts are fixed-fee arrangements and a portion of the project fee is billed in
advance, and the remainder is billed periodically over the duration of the project. The Company
conducts custom research which measures and monitors market issues specific to individual
healthcare organizations. The majority of the Companys custom research is performed under
contracts which provide for advance billing of 65% of the total project fee with the remainder due
upon delivery. Revenue and direct expenses for the Companys performance tracking services are
recognized under the proportional performance method.
Under the proportional performance method, the Company recognizes revenue based on output measures
or key milestones such as survey set up, survey mailings, survey returns and reporting. The
Company measures its progress based on the level of completion of these output measures and
recognizes revenue accordingly. Management judgments and estimates must be made and used in
connection with revenue recognized using the proportional performance method. If management made
different judgments and estimates, then the amount and timing of revenue for any period could
differ materially from the reported revenue.
The Company recognizes subscription-based educational service revenue over the period of time the
service is provided. Generally, the subscription periods are for twelve months, and revenue is
recognized equally over the subscription period.
The Market Guide was published by NRC solely on an annual basis from 1996 to September 2008. The
Company recognizes revenue on Market Guide contracts upon delivery to the principal customers.
Revenue under some annual contracts which do not include monthly updates is fully recognized upon
delivery, typically in the third quarter of the year. Starting in May 2008, the Company added
subscription-based services the revenue from which is generally recognized on a monthly basis over
a twelve-month period. Until September 2008, the Company would defer costs of preparing the survey
data for Market Guide and expense these at the time the annual contract revenue was recognized.
These costs are primarily incremental external direct costs solely related to fulfilling the
Companys obligations under Market Guide contracts. Starting in October 2008, these costs were
expensed monthly. The Company generates additional revenue from incidental customers subsequent to
the completion of each monthly edition. Revenue and costs for these subsequent services are
recognized as the services are performed and completed. Market Guide is generally provided
pursuant to contracts that provide for the receipt of survey results that are customized to meet an
individual clients specific information needs. Typically, these contracts are not cancelable by
clients, clients receive no rights in the comprehensive healthcare database which results from this
survey, other than the right to use the customized reports purchased pursuant thereto, and amounts due for
Market Guide are billed prior to or at delivery.
16
Table of Contents
As a result of the timing of recognition of revenue and costs associated with Market Guide, the
Companys margins vary throughout the year. The Companys revenue recognition policy for Market
Guide is not sensitive to significant estimates and judgments.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company monitors events and changes in
circumstances that may require the Company to review the carrying value of its long-lived assets.
The Company assesses whether an impairment of assets held and used may have occurred using
undiscounted future operating cash flows. Impairments, if they occur, are measured using the fair
value of the assets. The assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets may be adversely
impacted if estimated future operating cash flows are not achieved.
The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Among
others, management believes the following circumstances are important indicators of potential
impairment of such assets and, as a result, may trigger an impairment review:
| Significant underperformance in comparison to historical or projected operating results; |
||
| Significant changes in the manner or use of acquired assets or the Companys overall strategy; |
||
| Significant negative trends in the Companys industry or the overall economy; |
||
| A significant decline in the market price for the Companys common stock for a
sustained period; and |
||
| The Companys market capitalization falling below the book value of the
Companys net assets. |
Valuation of Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include customer relationships, trade name and goodwill. Goodwill represents the
difference between the purchase price paid in acquisitions, using the purchase method of
accounting, and the fair value of the net assets acquired.
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and, as a
result, the Company does not amortize goodwill.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had net goodwill of $39.3 million. As of October 1 of each
year (or more frequently as changes in circumstances indicate), the Company evaluates the estimated
fair value of the Companys goodwill. On these evaluation dates, to the extent that the carrying
value of the net assets of the Companys reporting units having goodwill is greater than the
estimated fair value, impairment charges will be recorded. The Companys analysis has not resulted
in the recognition of an impairment loss on goodwill in 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under that method,
deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases using enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of
a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Valuation allowances, if any, are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Management judgment is required to determine
the provision for income taxes and to determine whether deferred income taxes will be realized in
full or in part.
17
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected financial information derived
from the Companys consolidated financial statements, expressed as a percentage of total revenue
and the percentage change in such items versus the prior comparable period. The trends illustrated
in the following table may not necessarily be indicative of future results. The discussion that
follows the table should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
Percentage of Total Revenue | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
over | over | |||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 4.3 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Direct expenses |
46.3 | 44.6 | 44.4 | 8.3 | 12.1 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative |
25.0 | 26.9 | 27.8 | (3.4 | ) | 8.4 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5.3 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 14.3 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
76.5 | 76.8 | 77.4 | 3.9 | 10.9 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
23.5 | % | 23.2 | % | 22.6 | % | 5.5 | % | 14.7 | % | ||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2008, Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007
Revenue. Revenue increased 4.3% in 2008 to $51.0 million from $48.9 million in 2007. This was
primarily due to increases in the scope of work from existing clients and the addition of new
clients.
Direct expenses. Direct expenses increased 8.3% to $23.6 million in 2008 from $21.8 million in
2007. The change was primarily due to an increase in salaries, benefits and travel of $1.2
million, the result of the change in the business model and the allocation of responsibilities
related to sales and servicing clients. In 2008, the Company divided its sales force into two
groups, one focused only on bringing in prospective new clients and the second focused exclusively
on servicing current clients. As a result, salaries, benefits and travel attributable to the group
focused on current clients are now classified as direct expenses rather than selling, general and
administrative expenses. Direct expenses increased as a percentage of total revenue to 46.3% in
2008 from 44.6% in 2007.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased 3.4% to $12.7 million in 2008 from $13.2 million in 2007. The change was largely due to
the 2008 change in the business model and the allocation of responsibilities related to sales and
servicing clients. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of total
revenue to 25.0% in 2008 from 26.9% in 2007.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased 4.0% to $2.7
million in 2008 from $2.6 million in 2007. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of
revenue remained at 5.3% in 2008 and 2007 respectively.
18
Table of Contents
Provision for income taxes. The provision for income taxes totaled $4.5 million (37.9% effective
tax rate) for 2008 compared to $4.3 million (38.5% effective tax rate) for 2007. The effective tax
rate was lower in 2008 due to decreases in provincial income tax rates.
Year Ended December 31, 2007, Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006
Revenue. Revenue increased 11.8% in 2007 to $48.9 million from $43.8 million in 2006. This was
primarily due to increases in the scope of work from existing clients, the addition of new clients,
and the acquisition of TGI in May 2006, which generated $4.1 million more of revenue in 2007
compared to 2006.
Direct expenses. Direct expenses increased 12.1% to $21.8 million in 2007 from $19.4 million in
2006 primarily due to increases in conference costs of $990,000, postage of $421,000, fieldwork of
$291,000, and printing of $241,000 to support the increased revenue from TGI, and new clients and
growth in the scope of work from existing clients. Direct expenses increased as a percentage of
total revenue to 44.6% in 2007 from 44.4% in 2006.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased 8.4% to $13.2 million in 2007 from $12.2 million in 2006. The change was primarily due
to increases in salary and benefits and contracted services of $1,071,000. The salary increases
were primarily attributed to the acquisition of TGI. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased as a percentage of total revenue to 26.9% in 2007 from 27.8% in 2006.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased 14.3% to $2.6
million in 2007 from $2.3 million in 2006. The increase was primarily due to the amortization of
intangible assets associated with the acquisition of TGI. Depreciation and amortization as a
percentage of revenue increased slightly to 5.3% in 2007 from 5.2% in 2006.
Provision for income taxes. The provision for income taxes totaled $4.3 million (38.5% effective
tax rate) for 2007 compared to $3.6 million (38.1% effective tax rate) for 2006. The effective tax
rate was lower in 2006 due to differences in state income taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company believes it has adequate capital resources and operating cash flow to meet its
projected capital and debt maturity needs for the foreseeable future. Requirements for working
capital, capital expenditures, and debt maturities will continue to be funded by operations and the
Companys borrowing arrangements.
Working Capital
The Company had a working capital deficiency of $10.7 million on December 31, 2008, as compared to
a $2.4 million working capital deficiency on December 31, 2007. The increase in the working
capital deficiency was primarily due to billings in excess of revenue earned increasing by $3.0
million, unbilled revenue decreasing by $600,000 and increased debt of $3.5 million to fund the MIV
acquisition in December 2008. Cash and cash equivalents also decreased by $2.2 million, as a
result of funding 2008 share repurchases and paying off in 2008 the remainder of the term note
balance from 2007.
Billings in excess of revenue earned increased primarily due to timing of initial billings on new
and renewal contracts. The Company typically invoices clients for performance tracking services
and custom research projects before they have been completed. Billed amounts are recorded as
billings in excess of revenue earned, or deferred revenue, on the Companys consolidated financial
statements, and are recognized as income when earned. In addition, when work is performed in
advance of billing, the Company records this work as revenue earned in excess of billings, or
unbilled revenue. With the change in Market Guide, billings
in excess of revenue earned increased $1.5 million as of December 31, 2008. Substantially all
deferred and unbilled revenue will be earned and billed respectively, within 12 months of the
respective period ends.
19
Table of Contents
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $2.8 million. These expenditures
consisted of computer hardware, computer software, and building improvements, and the addition of
$846,000 with the acquisition of MIV.
The Company has budgeted approximately $2.0 million for capital expenditures in 2009 to be funded
through cash generated from operations. The Company expects that these expenditures will be
primarily for computer hardware and software, and equipment.
Debt and Equity
On May 26, 2006, the Company entered into a credit facility pursuant to which it borrowed $9.0
million under a term note and $3.5 million under a revolving credit note in order to partially
finance the acquisition of TGI. The term note was refinanced on February 25, 2008, for the
remaining balance of the term note of $1,602,675. The refinanced term note required payments of
principal and interest in 17 monthly installments of $92,821, beginning March 31, 2008, and ending
August 31, 2009. Borrowings under the refinanced term note bore interest at an annual rate of
5.14%. The Company made additional payments and paid off the term note in October 2008.
The maximum aggregate amount available under the revolving credit note was originally $3.5 million,
but an addendum to the revolving credit note dated March 26, 2008, changed the revolving credit
note amount to $6.5 million. The revolving credit note was renewed in July 2008 to extend the term
to July 31, 2009. The Company may borrow, repay and re-borrow amounts under the revolving credit
note from time to time until its maturity on July 31, 2009. The maximum aggregate amount available
under the revolving credit note is $6.5 million, subject to a borrowing base equal to 75% of the
Companys eligible accounts receivable. Borrowings under the revolving credit note bear interest
at a variable rate equal to (1) prime (as defined in the credit facility) less 0.50% or (2) one-,
two-, three-, six- or twelve-month LIBOR. The Company expects to extend the term of the revolving
credit note for at least one year beyond the maturity date. As of December 31, 2008, the balance
of the revolving credit note was $3.9 million.
On December 19, 2008, the Company borrowed $9.0 million under a term note to partially finance the
acquisition of MIV. The term note is payable in 35 equal installments of $96,829, with the balance
of principal and interest payable in a balloon payment due on December 31, 2011. Borrowings under
the term note bear interest at a rate of 5.2% per year.
The term note is secured by certain of the Companys assets, including the Companys land,
building, accounts receivable and intangibles. The term note contains various restrictions and
covenants applicable to the Company, including requirements that the Company maintain certain
financial ratios at prescribed levels and restrictions on the ability of the Company to consolidate
or merge, create liens, incur additional indebtedness or dispose of assets. As of December 31,
2008, the Company was in compliance with these restrictions and covenants.
Debt acquired through the MIV acquisition included $89,741 in capital leases. The capital leases
are for production and mailing equipment meeting capitalization requirements where the lease term
exceeds more than 75% of the estimated useful life. The equipment is being depreciated over the
lease term of 4.25 years ending in 2011.
20
Table of Contents
The Company had obligations to make cash payments in the following amounts in the future as of
December 31, 2008:
Total | Less than | One to | Three to | After | ||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Payments | One Year | Three Years | Five Years | Five Years | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
$ | 2,197,826 | $ | 626,201 | $ | 1,400,867 | $ | 170,758 | $ | | ||||||||||
Revolving credit note |
3,850,000 | 3,850,000 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other debt |
14,148 | 14,148 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Capital leases |
101,871 | 37,044 | 64,827 | | | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
10,274,496 | 1,161,946 | 9,112,550 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 16,438,341 | $ | 5,689,339 | $ | 10,578,244 | $ | 170,758 | $ | | ||||||||||
The balance of the Companys revolving credit note as of December 31, 2008, is shown in the
contractual obligations table as a cash payment obligation during the year in which the notes term
expires. Interest related to the revolving credit note is dependent on the level of borrowing and
variable interest rates as more fully described in Note 7 to the Companys consolidated financial
statements, and is not shown in this table.
The Company generally does not make unconditional, non-cancelable purchase commitments. The
Company enters into purchase orders in the normal course of business, but these purchase
obligations do not exceed one year.
Shareholders equity decreased $3.7 million to $38.6 million in 2008 from $42.3 million in 2007.
The decrease was primarily due to the purchase of treasury stock, including stock used to pay the
exercise price of options exercised, of $10.1 million and payment of cash dividends of $3.8
million. This was partially offset by an increase in net income and the exercise of stock options.
Stock Repurchase Program
In February 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the repurchase of an additional
750,000 shares of common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As of
December 31, 2008, the remaining shares that can be purchased are 292,593.
Off-Balance Sheet Obligations
The Company has no significant off-balance sheet obligations other than the operating lease
commitments disclosed in Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), for financial assets and financial liabilities. In accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157, the Company delayed application of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities, until January 1, 2009. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. The adoption of SFAS 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities has
not had a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis include reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment
test. Certain non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include
non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test, as well as
intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment
assessment. As stated above, SFAS 157 will be applicable to these fair value measurements
beginning January 1, 2009. Management believes that adoption of SFAS 157-2 for non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
21
Table of Contents
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (No. 159). This
statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. The provisions of SFAS No. 159 were effective as of January 1, 2008. The adoption
of SFAS No. 159 has not had a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) in
EITF Issue No. 07-3, Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received
for Use in Future Research and Development Activities (EITF 07-3), which requires that
nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future
research and development activities be deferred and amortized over the period that the goods are
delivered or the related services are performed, subject to an assessment of recoverability. EITF
07-3 is effective as of the beginning of a companys first fiscal year that begins after
December 15, 2007. The adoption of EITF 07-3 has had no impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 162). This statement identifies the sources of, and framework for, selecting
the accounting principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental
entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
in the United States (GAAP hierarchy). Because the current GAAP hierarchy is set forth in the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement on Auditing Standards No. 69, it is
directed to the auditor rather than to the entity responsible for selecting accounting principles
for financial statements presented in conformity with GAAP. Accordingly, the FASB concluded the
GAAP hierarchy should reside in the accounting literature established by the FASB and issued this
statement to achieve that result. The provisions of SFAS 162 are effective November 15, 2008,
which is 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. The adoption of SFAS 162 has not had a material effect on the consolidated
financial statements
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)), which replaces SFAS 141, Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and
requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination (1) recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any controlling
interest; (2) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain
from a bargain purchase; and (3) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the
financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
SFAS 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date
is on or after an entitys fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008. Management will assess
the impact of SFAS 141(R) if, and when, a future acquisition occurs.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). This statement amends Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in
a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The provisions of SFAS No. 160 are
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Management believes that the adoption of SFAS 160 will not have a material effect on the consolidated
financial statements.
22
Table of Contents
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
The impact of financial market risk exposure to the Company is not significant. The Companys
primary financial market risk exposure consisted of interest rate risk related to interest expense
from the Companys revolving credit note with a variable interest rate. See Note 7 to the
Companys consolidated financial statements. The balance on the revolving credit note was
$3,850,000 as of December 31, 2008, with an interest rate of 2.75%. If the balance on the
revolving credit note remains the same and interest rates increase .5%, interest expense for the
year would increase $19,000. The Company plans on paying off the revolving credit note in one
year.
The Company also had limited interest rate risk related to interest income from the Companys
investments in United States government securities with maturities of three years or less. The
Company exited its investments in such securities during 2008 and, as a result, did not have
investments in such securities as of December 31, 2008. See Note 3 to the Companys consolidated
financial statements. Generally, if the overall average return on such securities would have
decreased .5% from the average return during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, then the
Companys interest income and pre-tax income would have decreased approximately $3,000 and $10,000,
respectively. These amounts were determined by considering the impact of a hypothetical change in
interest rates on the Companys interest income.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth selected financial information for each of the eight quarters in the
two-year period ended December 31, 2008. This unaudited information has been prepared by the
Company on the same basis as the consolidated financial statements and includes all normal
recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly this information when read in conjunction with
the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Sept 30, | June 30, | Mar. 31, | Dec. 31, | Sept 30, | June 30, | Mar. 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 12,189 | $ | 13,469 | $ | 11,901 | $ | 13,454 | $ | 10,821 | $ | 13,952 | $ | 11,945 | $ | 12,205 | ||||||||||||||||
Direct expenses |
5,766 | 6,598 | 5,320 | 5,927 | 5,057 | 5,930 | 5,366 | 5,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
2,768 | 3,053 | 3,348 | 3,559 | 3,283 | 3,240 | 3,250 | 3,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
682 | 661 | 676 | 666 | 661 | 672 | 623 | 627 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
2,973 | 3,157 | 2,557 | 3,302 | 1,820 | 4,110 | 2,706 | 2,730 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
70 | 14 | (58 | ) | (32 | ) | (25 | ) | (57 | ) | (30 | ) | (137 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
1,148 | 1,205 | 918 | 1,267 | 686 | 1,558 | 1,035 | 999 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,895 | $ | 1,966 | $ | 1,581 | $ | 2,003 | $ | 1,109 | $ | 2,495 | $ | 1,641 | $ | 1,594 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.29 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.23 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.23 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
6,642 | 6,644 | 6,637 | 6,818 | 6,861 | 6,851 | 6,845 | 6,842 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
6,782 | 6,803 | 6,793 | 6,970 | 7,034 | 7,013 | 7,002 | 6,964 |
23
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
National Research Corporation:
National Research Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Research Corporation and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008. In connection with our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule listed in
Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of National Research Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Lincoln, Nebraska
March 31, 2009
March 31, 2009
24
Table of Contents
NATIONAL RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,108,853 | $ | 3,355,141 | ||||
Investments in marketable debt securities |
| 99,497 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $240,653
and $70,212 in 2008 and 2007, respectively |
6,531,125 | 6,378,914 | ||||||
Unbilled revenue |
809,596 | 1,377,427 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
1,299,975 | 1,068,446 | ||||||
Recoverable income taxes |
573,676 | 272,219 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
115,421 | 48,657 | ||||||
Total current assets |
10,438,646 | 12,600,301 | ||||||
Net property and equipment |
13,746,787 | 11,974,029 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
8,056,367 | 5,615,910 | ||||||
Goodwill |
39,275,939 | 31,051,202 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 590,034 | ||||||
Other |
626,871 | 37,317 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 72,144,610 | $ | 61,868,793 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of note payable |
$ | 4,580,719 | $ | 1,092,754 | ||||
Accounts payable |
863,273 | 1,106,317 | ||||||
Accrued wages, bonus and profit sharing |
1,374,744 | 1,477,021 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
1,344,032 | 1,386,133 | ||||||
Billings in excess of revenue earned |
12,926,119 | 9,921,763 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
21,088,887 | 14,983,988 | ||||||
Note payable, net of current portion |
8,373,170 | 1,900,598 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
4,084,241 | 2,697,774 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
33,546,298 | 19,582,360 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares, issued
8,019,922 in 2008 and 7,883,289 in 2007, outstanding 6,667,517 in 2008 and
6,926,442 in 2007 |
8,020 | 7,883 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
27,216,769 | 23,508,717 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
33,677,381 | 30,003,606 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes |
(6,010 | ) | 931,655 | |||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,352,405 shares in 2008 and 956,847 shares in 2007 |
(22,297,848 | ) | (12,165,428 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
38,598,312 | 42,286,433 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 72,144,610 | $ | 61,868,793 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
Table of Contents
NATIONAL RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE
THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 51,013,417 | $ | 48,922,884 | $ | 43,771,455 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Direct expenses |
23,610,922 | 21,801,039 | 19,445,925 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
12,728,081 | 13,173,431 | 12,158,004 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,685,641 | 2,582,866 | 2,259,669 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
39,024,644 | 37,557,336 | 33,863,598 | |||||||||
Operating income |
11,988,773 | 11,365,548 | 9,907,857 | |||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||
Interest income |
41,841 | 138,702 | 171,273 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(138,901 | ) | (483,135 | ) | (517,482 | ) | ||||||
Other, net |
90,852 | 96,269 | (55,893 | ) | ||||||||
Total other expense |
(6,208 | ) | (248,164 | ) | (402,102 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
11,982,565 | 11,117,384 | 9,505,755 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,537,704 | 4,278,372 | 3,621,687 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,444,861 | $ | 6,839,012 | $ | 5,884,068 | ||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 1.11 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 0.86 | ||||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 1.09 | $ | 0.98 | $ | 0.85 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
Table of Contents
NATIONAL RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AS OF AND FOR THE
THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AS OF AND FOR THE
THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Paid-in | Retained | Unearned | Comprehensive | Treasury | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Capital | Earnings | Compensation | Income | Stock | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2005 |
7,741 | 20,046,027 | 23,360,297 | (432,631 | ) | 300,369 | (10,688,312 | ) | 32,593,491 | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of 52,217 shares of treasury stock |
| | | | | (1,236,055 | ) | (1,236,055 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 89,307 common shares for the
exercise of stock options |
89 | 926,102 | | | | | 926,191 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from the exercise of options
and vested restricted stock |
| 404,535 | | | | | 404,535 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 13,218 restricted common
shares, net of 5,250 cancelled |
8 | (8 | ) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-cash stock
compensation expense |
| 875,684 | | | | | 875,684 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassify unearned compensation |
| (432,631 | ) | | 432,631 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared of $0.40 per common
share |
| | (2,756,057 | ) | | | | (2,756,057 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain/(loss) on
marketable securities, net of tax |
| | | | 67,436 | | 67,436 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in cumulative translation
adjustment |
| | | | (8,780 | ) | | (8,780 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 5,884,068 | | | | 5,884,068 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
5,942,724 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2006 |
7,838 | 21,819,709 | 26,488,308 | | 359,025 | (11,924,367 | ) | 36,750,513 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of 61,849 shares of treasury stock |
| | | | | (241,061 | ) | (241,061 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 22,829 common shares for the
exercise of stock options |
22 | 337,764 | | | | | 337,786 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from the exercise of options
and vested restricted stock |
| 111,551 | | | | | 111,551 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 32,115 restricted common
shares, net of 9,109 cancelled |
23 | (23 | ) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-cash stock
compensation expense |
| 1,239,716 | | | | | 1,239,716 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared of $0.48 per common
share |
| | (3,323,714 | ) | | | | (3,323,714 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain/(loss) on
marketable securities, net of tax |
| | | | 4,085 | | 4,085 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in cumulative translation
adjustment |
| | | | 568,545 | | 568,545 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 6,839,012 | | | | 6,839,012 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
7,411,642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2007 |
$ | 7,883 | $ | 23,508,717 | $ | 30,003,606 | $ | | $ | 931,655 | $ | (12,165,428 | ) | $ | 42,286,433 | |||||||||||||
Purchase of 395,558 shares of treasury
stock |
| | | | | (10,132,420 | ) | (10,132,420 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 144,614 common shares for the
exercise of stock options |
145 | 1,856,160 | | | | | 1,856,305 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from the exercise of options
and vested restricted stock |
| 835,682 | | | | | 835,682 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of 7,981 restricted common
shares |
(8 | ) | 8 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-cash stock
compensation expense |
| 1,016,202 | | | | | 1,016,202 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared of $0.56 per common
share |
| | (3,771,086 | ) | | | | (3,771,086 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain/(loss) on
marketable securities, net of tax |
| | | | 133 | | 133 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in cumulative translation
adjustment |
| | | | (937,798 | ) | | (937,798 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
6,507,196 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 7,444,861 | | | | 7,444,861 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2008 |
$ | 8,020 | $ | 27,216,769 | $ | 33,677,381 | $ | | $ | (6,010 | ) | $ | (22,297,848 | ) | $ | 38,598,312 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
Table of Contents
NATIONAL RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,444,861 | $ | 6,839,012 | $ | 5,884,068 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,685,641 | 2,582,866 | 2,259,669 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
430,359 | 117,046 | 99,135 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
| (3,587 | ) | (50 | ) | |||||||
Gain on sale of other investments |
| | 47,616 | |||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
155,808 | 31,245 | 63,005 | |||||||||
Non-cash stock compensation expense |
1,016,202 | 1,092,776 | 1,022,624 | |||||||||
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: |
||||||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
636,344 | 616,423 | (884,575 | ) | ||||||||
Unbilled revenue |
603,196 | 900,397 | (1,089,431 | ) | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
(154,580 | ) | 30,190 | 256,809 | ||||||||
Accounts payable |
(407,716 | ) | (73,154 | ) | 22,006 | |||||||
Accrued expenses, wages, bonus and profit sharing |
6,237 | 329,845 | (58,680 | ) | ||||||||
Income taxes payable and recoverable |
(249,135 | ) | 562,797 | (714,293 | ) | |||||||
Billings in excess of revenue earned |
3,008,164 | 1,540,258 | (95,723 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
15,175,381 | 14,566,114 | 6,812,180 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(2,812,350 | ) | (1,956,204 | ) | (1,453,128 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
| 200 | 50 | |||||||||
Acquisition, net of cash acquired and earn-out on acquisition |
(12,551,194 | ) | | (20,620,521 | ) | |||||||
Purchases of securities available-for-sale |
| (2,990,012 | ) | (1,378,523 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from the maturities of securities available-for-sale |
99,477 | 4,007,262 | 9,784,215 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(15,264,067 | ) | (938,754 | ) | (13,667,907 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from notes payable |
18,564,148 | 375,000 | 14,795,000 | |||||||||
Payments on notes payable |
(8,951,785 | ) | (8,474,621 | ) | (5,173,310 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
731,319 | 337,786 | 926,191 | |||||||||
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options and vested restricted stock |
679,874 | 80,306 | 341,530 | |||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(9,007,434 | ) | (241,061 | ) | (1,236,055 | ) | ||||||
Payment of dividends on common stock |
(3,771,086 | ) | (3,323,714 | ) | (2,756,057 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(1,754,964 | ) | (11,246,304 | ) | 6,897,299 | |||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(402,638 | ) | 97,726 | (9,171 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(2,246,288 | ) | 2,478,782 | 32,401 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
3,355,141 | 876,360 | 843,959 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 1,108,853 | $ | 3,355,142 | $ | 876,360 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid for: |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 122,468 | $ | 483,135 | $ | 600,719 | ||||||
Income taxes |
$ | 3,501,958 | $ | 3,457,478 | $ | 3,839,192 |
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing activities:
In connection with the Companys Equity Incentive plans, certain optionees tendered to the Company
previously owned shares to pay for the option strike price. The total non-cash stock options
exercised was $1,124,986 for the year ended December 31, 2008.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
28
Table of Contents
NATIONAL RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
National Research Corporation (the Company) is a provider of ongoing survey-based performance
measurement, analysis, tracking, improvement services and governance education to the healthcare
industry in the United States and Canada. The Company provides market research services to
hospitals and insurance companies on an unsecured credit basis. The Companys ten largest clients
accounted for 24%, 29%, and 32% of the Companys total revenue in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. One client accounted for 7%, 8% and 8% of total revenue in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries.
All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Translation of Foreign Currencies
The Companys Canadian subsidiary uses as its functional currency the local currency of the country
in which it operates. It translates its assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars at the exchange
rate in effect at the balance sheet date. It translates its revenue and expenses at the average
exchange rate during the period. The Company includes translation gains and losses in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss), a component of shareholders equity. Gains and losses related
to transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the countries in
which the Company operates and short-term intercompany accounts are included in other income
(expense) in the consolidated statements of income.
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives a majority of its operating revenue from its annually renewable services, which
include the performance tracking services, subscription-based educational services and
subscription-based and annual contracts of the Market Guide. The Company provides interim and
annual performance tracking to its clients under annual client service contracts, although such
contracts are generally cancelable on short or no notice without penalty. The Company provides
subscription-based educational services to clients generally under annual service contracts over a
twelve-month period and publishes healthcare market information for its clients through its Market
Guide on an annual or monthly basis. The Company also derives revenue from its custom and other
research projects. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities
are accounted for on a net basis and, therefore, are excluded from revenue in the consolidated
statements of income.
The Company recognizes revenue from its performance tracking services and its custom and other
research projects using the proportional performance method of accounting. These services
typically include a series of surveys and deliverable reports in which the timing and frequency
vary by contract.
29
Table of Contents
Progress on a contract can be tracked reliably, and customers are obligated to pay as services are
performed. The Company recognizes revenue based on output measures or key milestones such as
survey set up, survey mailings, survey returns and reporting. The Company measures its progress
based on the level of completion of these output measures and recognizes the revenue related to
output measures. Losses expected to be incurred, if any, on jobs in progress are charged to income
as soon as such losses are known. Revenue earned on contracts in progress in excess of billings is
classified as a current asset. Amounts billed in excess of revenue earned are classified as a
current liability. Client projects are generally completed within a twelve-month period.
The Company recognizes subscription-based educational service revenue over the period of time the
service is provided. Generally, the subscription periods are for twelve months and revenue is
recognized equally over the subscription period.
The Company recognizes revenue on Market Guide contracts upon delivery to the principal customers.
Revenue under some annual contracts which do not include monthly updates is fully recognized upon
delivery, typically in the third quarter of the year. Starting in May 2008, the Company added
subscription-based services, the revenue from which is generally recognized on a monthly basis over
a twelve-month period. Until September 2008, the Company deferred costs of preparing the survey
data for Market Guide and expensed these at the time the annual contract revenue was recognized.
These costs are primarily incremental external direct costs solely related to fulfilling the
Companys obligations under Market Guide contracts. Beginning in October 2008, these cost are
expensed monthly as incurred. The Company generates additional revenue from incidental customers
subsequent to the completion of each monthly edition. Revenue and costs for these subsequent
services are recognized as the services are performed and completed.
Trade Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount. The allowance for doubtful accounts
is the Companys best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Companys existing
accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on specific account analysis and
on the Companys historical write-off experience. The Company reviews the allowance for doubtful
accounts monthly. Past due balances over 90 days and over a specified amount are reviewed
individually for collectability and provisions are made for accounts not specifically reviewed.
Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been
exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost. Major expenditures to purchase property or to
substantially increase useful lives of property are capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor
renewals are expensed as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, their costs
and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and resulting gains or losses
are included in income.
For costs of software developed for internal use, the Company expenses computer software costs as
incurred in the preliminary project stage, which involves the conceptual formulation, evaluation
and selection of technology alternatives. Costs incurred related to the design, coding,
installation and testing of software during the application project stage are capitalized. Costs
for training and application maintenance are expensed as incurred. The Company has capitalized
approximately $493,000, $511,000 and $803,000, of internal and external costs incurred for the
development of internal use software for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, with such costs classified as property and equipment.
30
Table of Contents
The Company provides for depreciation and amortization of property and equipment using annual rates
which are sufficient to amortize the cost of depreciable assets over their estimated useful lives.
The Company uses the straight-line method of depreciation and amortization over estimated useful
lives of five to ten years for furniture and equipment, three to five years for computer equipment,
three to five years for capitalized software, and ten to forty years for the Companys office
building and related improvements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company monitors events and changes in
circumstances that may require the Company to review the carrying value of its long-lived assets.
The Company assesses whether an impairment of assets held and used may have occurred using
undiscounted future operating cash flows. Impairments, if they occur, are measured using the fair
value of the assets. The assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets may be adversely
impacted if estimated future operating cash flows are not achieved.
The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Among
others, management believes the following circumstances are important indicators of potential
impairment of such assets and as a result may trigger an impairment review:
| Significant underperformance in comparison to historical or projected
operating results; |
| Significant changes in the manner or use of acquired assets or the
Companys overall strategy; |
| Significant negative trends in the Companys industry or the overall
economy; |
| A significant decline in the market price for the Companys common
stock for a sustained period; and |
| The Companys market capitalization falling below the book value of the
Companys net assets. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include customer relationships, trade name and goodwill. Customer relationships
are being amortized over periods of five to fifteen years. The trade name is being amortized over
a period of ten years. Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price paid in
acquisitions, using the purchase method of accounting, and the fair value of the net assets
acquired.
Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have
an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment at least
annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful
lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No.
144.
All of
the Companys goodwill is allocated to five reporting units.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company has net goodwill of $39.3 million. As of October 1 of each
year (or more frequently as changes in circumstances indicate), the Company evaluates the estimated
fair value of the Companys goodwill. On these evaluation dates, to the extent that the carrying value of the
net assets of the Companys reporting units having goodwill is greater than the estimated fair
value, impairment charges will be determined and measured based on the estimated fair value of
goodwill as compared to its carrying value. The Companys analysis has not resulted in the
recognition of an impairment loss on goodwill in 2008, 2007 or 2006.
31
Table of Contents
Investments in Marketable Debt Securities
All marketable debt securities held by the Company at December 31, 2007, were classified as
available-for-sale and recorded at fair market value. No marketable debt securities were held as
of December 31, 2008. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, on
available-for-sale securities are reported as other comprehensive income or loss. Realized gains
and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined on a
specific-identification basis. Fair values are estimated based on quoted market prices. Interest
income is recognized when earned.
A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost that is deemed to be
other-than-temporary results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is
charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. To determine whether an
impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to
hold the investment until a market price recovery and considers whether evidence indicating the
cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary. Evidence considered in
this assessment includes the reasons for the impairment, the severity and duration of the
impairment, changes in value subsequent to year-end, and forecasted performance of the investee.
The Companys analysis has not resulted in the recognition of an impairment loss on investments in
2008, 2007 or 2006.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under that method,
deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax basis using enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date. Valuation allowances, if any, are established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
Beginning with the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (FIN 48), as of January 1, 2007, the Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions
only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax
positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized.
Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment
occurs. Prior to the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized the effect of income tax positions
only if such positions were probable of being sustained.
At December 31, 2008, the Company has no unrecognized tax benefits. The Company classifies
interest and penalties arising from the underpayment of income taxes in the statements of income as
selling, general and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has no accrued
interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The tax years 2006 to 2008 federal
returns remain open to examination, and the tax years 2004 to 2008 remain open to examination by
other taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.
32
Table of Contents
Share-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R Share-Based Payment (SFAS No.
123R) under the modified version of the prospective transition method. Under the modified
prospective transition method, compensation cost is recognized on or after the required effective
date for the portion of the outstanding awards for which the requisite service has not yet been
rendered, based on the grant date fair value of those awards calculated under SFAS No. 123R for
either recognition or pro forma disclosures. All of the Companys existing stock option awards and
non-vested stock awards have been determined to be equity awards in accordance with SFAS No. 123R.
The Company currently intends that shares of common stock issued upon the exercise of options will
be newly-issued shares. No share-based compensation costs were capitalized for the twelve-month
periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. Amounts recognized in the financial statements with
respect to these plans under SFAS No. 123R are as follows:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||
Amounts charged against income,
before income tax benefit |
$ | 1,016 | $ | 1,093 | $ | 1,023 | ||||||
Amount of related income tax benefit |
391 | 421 | 399 | |||||||||
Total net income impact |
$ | 625 | $ | 672 | $ | 624 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments
with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2008,
cash equivalents were $378,994 consisting of money market funds.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS 157)
establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires companies to maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. SFAS 157s valuation
techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily
obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Companys market
assumptions. SFAS 157 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy: (1) Level 1
Inputsquoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, (2) Level 2
Inputsobservable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and
liabilities and (3) Level 3 Inputs unobservable inputs.
As of December 31, 2008, those assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis consisted of the Companys money market funds. They totaled $378,994 and are
considered Level 1 inputs. The Company believes that the carrying amounts of its other financial
instruments, including cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair value
due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Earnings Per Share
Net income per share has been calculated and presented for basic and diluted per share data.
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. Diluted income per share is computed by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of common shares adjusted for the dilutive effects of options and
restricted stock. At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company had -0-, 48,000 and -0-
options, respectively, which have been excluded from the diluted net income per share computation
because their exercise price exceeds the fair market value.
33
Table of Contents
The weighted average shares outstanding were calculated as follows:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Common stock |
6,684,641 | 6,849,717 | 6,836,456 | |||||||||
Dilutive effect of options |
130,567 | 131,036 | 91,885 | |||||||||
Dilutive effect of restricted stock |
15,531 | 30,518 | 25,623 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares used for
dilutive per share information |
6,830,739 | 7,011,271 | 6,953,964 | |||||||||
There are no reconciling items between the Companys reported net income and net income used in the
computation of basic and diluted income per share.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 7,445 | $ | 6,839 | $ | 5,884 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) from investments: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized gains |
| 7 | 112 | |||||||||
Related tax expense |
| (3 | ) | (44 | ) | |||||||
Net |
| 4 | 68 | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
(938 | ) | 569 | (9 | ) | |||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
(938 | ) | 573 | 59 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 6,507 | $ | 7,412 | $ | 5,943 | ||||||
Segment Information
The Company has six operating segments that are aggregated into one reporting segment because they
have similar economic characteristics and meet the other aggregation criteria of SFAS No. 131,
Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The six operating segments are
as follows: NRC Picker U.S. and NRC Picker Canada, which each offer renewable performance tracking
and improvement services, custom research, subscription-based educational services, and a renewable
syndicated service; Health Care Market Guide (HCMG) offers stand-alone market information as well
as a comparative performance database to allow the Companys clients to assess their performance
relative to the industry, to access best practice examples, and to utilize competitive information
for marketing purposes; Payer Solutions offers functional disease-specific and health status
measurement tools; The Governance Institute (TGI) offers subscription-based governance information
and educational conferences designed to improve the effectiveness of hospital and health care
systems by continually strengthening their healthcare boards, medical leadership, and management
performance in the United States; and My InnerView (MIV) provides quality and performance
improvement solutions to the senior care profession.
34
Table of Contents
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements,
for financial assets and financial liabilities. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
Board Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, the Company delayed
application of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities until January 1,
2009. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption
of SFAS 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities has not had a material effect on the
consolidated financial statements.
Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis include reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment
test. Certain non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a
goodwill impairment test, as well as intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived assets
measured at fair value for impairment assessment. As stated above, SFAS 157 will be applicable to
these fair value measurements beginning January 1, 2009. Management believes that adoption of SFAS
157-2 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities will not have a material effect on the
consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (No. 159). This
statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. The provisions of SFAS No. 159 were effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of
SFAS No. 159 has not had a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) in
EITF Issue No. 07-3, Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received
for Use in Future Research and Development Activities (EITF 07-3), which requires that
nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future
research and development activities be deferred and amortized over the period that the goods are
delivered or the related services are performed, subject to an assessment of recoverability. EITF
07-3 was effective as of January 1, 2008. The adoption of EITF 07-3 has had no impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 162). This statement identifies the sources of and framework for selecting the
accounting principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental
entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
in the United States (GAAP hierarchy). Because the current GAAP hierarchy is set forth in the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement on Auditing Standards No. 69, it is
directed to the auditor rather than to the entity responsible for selecting accounting principles
for financial statements presented in conformity with GAAP. Accordingly, the FASB concluded the
GAAP hierarchy should reside in the accounting literature established by the FASB and issued this
statement to achieve that result. The provisions of SFAS 162 are effective November 15, 2008,
which is 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. The adoption of SFAS 162 has not had a material effect on the consolidated
financial statements.
35
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)), which replaces SFAS 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer in a business combination (1) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any controlling interest, (2) recognizes
and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase
and (3) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to
evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is to be
applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after an
entitys fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008. Management will assess the impact of
SFAS 141(R) if, and when, a future acquisition occurs.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). This statement amends Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in
subsidiaries and for the deconsolidation of subsidiaries. The provisions of SFAS No. 160 are
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Management believes that the adoption of SFAS 160 will not have a material
effect on the consolidated financial statements.
(2) Acquisitions
On December 19, 2008, the Company acquired My InnerView, Inc. (MIV), a leading provider of
quality and performance improvement solutions to the senior care profession. MIV offers resident,
family and employee satisfaction measurement and improvement products to the long term-care,
assisted and independent living markets in the United States. MIV works with over 8,000 senior care
providers throughout the United States, housing what the Company believes is the largest dataset of
senior care satisfaction metrics in the nation. The acquisition was completed in order to pursue
the Companys strategy of expanding additional service offerings to the healthcare industry in the
United States and Canada. This acquisition gives the Company a foundation upon which to expand in
the senior care profession. The consideration paid at closing for MIV included a payment of
$11,500,000 in cash and $440,183 of direct expenses capitalized as purchase price. The merger
agreement under which NRC acquired MIV provided for contingent earn-out payments over the next
three years based on revenue and operating income increases, which are not included in the
discussion of the purchase price below.
The Company has preliminarily allocated the purchase price as follows, based on the estimated fair
value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
Fair Value | ||||
Current Assets |
$ | 1,290,446 | ||
Property and equipment |
846,000 | |||
Customer relationships |
3,003,000 | |||
Goodwill |
8,833,477 | |||
Other Long Term Assets |
580,756 | |||
Total acquired assets |
14,553,679 | |||
Less total liabilities |
2,613,496 | |||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 11,940,183 | ||
36
Table of Contents
The excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired resulted in the Company
recording $8,833,477 of goodwill. The customer relationships acquired intangible asset is being
amortized over a useful life of 13 years. The amortization of customer relationships and goodwill
is expected to be non-deductible for tax purposes. Pending allocations include deferred income taxes, intangible asset
values and allowances.
The following unaudited pro forma information for the Company has been prepared as if the
acquisition of MIV had occurred on January 1, 2007. The information is based on the historical
results of the separate companies and may not necessarily be indicative of the results that could
have been achieved or of results that may occur in the future. The pro forma adjustments include
the impact of depreciation and amortization of property and equipment and intangible assets
acquired, interest expense on the acquisition debt, and income tax benefits for tax effects of the
foregoing adjustments to depreciation, amortization and interest expense.
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands, except | (In thousands, except | |||||||
per share amounts) | per share amounts) | |||||||
(Unaudited ) | (Unaudited ) | |||||||
Revenue |
$ | 58,008 | $ | 54,904 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 7,457 | $ | 6,586 | ||||
Earnings per share basic |
$ | 1.12 | $ | 0.96 | ||||
Earnings per share diluted |
$ | 1.09 | $ | 0.94 |
On May 30, 2006, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of TGI Group, LLC, operating
as The Governance Institute (TGI). TGI provides board members, executive management and
physician leaders of hospitals and health systems with knowledge and solutions to successfully
confront a wide array of strategic issues. TGI operations have been included in the Companys
consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition. The purchase price for TGI was
$19.8 million in cash, plus the assumption of certain liabilities. The Company paid $17.8 million
in cash to the seller at closing and $1.95 million into an escrow account. The escrow account was
released twelve months from the acquisition date. The Company incurred direct acquisition costs of
$305,000.
The Company has allocated the purchase price as follows, based on the estimated fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
Fair Value | ||||
Current assets |
$ | 730,804 | ||
Property and equipment |
67,573 | |||
Customer relationships |
2,694,000 | |||
Trade name |
1,572,000 | |||
Goodwill |
18,221,635 | |||
Total acquired assets |
23,286,012 | |||
Less total liabilities assumed |
3,201,691 | |||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 20,084,321 | ||
Of the $22,487,635 of acquired intangible assets, $2,694,000 was assigned to customer relationships
and $1,572,000 was assigned to a trade name. The customer relationships and trade name acquired
intangible assets are being amortized over useful lives of 6 and 10 years, respectively. The
excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired resulted in the Company
recording $18,221,635 of goodwill. The amortization of customer relationships, the trade name and
goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
37
Table of Contents
(3) Investments in Marketable Debt Securities
The Companys investments in marketable securities were in marketable debt securities classified as
obligations of U.S. government agencies. The Company held no investments in marketable debt
securities as of December 31, 2008. The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains and losses
and fair value of the Companys investment in the obligations of U.S. government agencies as of
December 31, 2007, were as follows:
2007 | ||||
Amortized cost |
$ | 99,714 | ||
Gross unrealized holding gains |
| |||
Gross unrealized holding losses |
(217 | ) | ||
Fair value |
$ | 99,497 | ||
There were no sales of marketable securities in advance of scheduled maturities of
available-for-sale marketable securities during 2008 or 2007. There were no unrealized losses on
investment securities at December 31, 2008.
(4) Property and Equipment
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, property and equipment consisted of the following:
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Furniture and equipment |
$ | 2,535,601 | $ | 2,350,644 | ||||
Computer equipment and software |
14,466,506 | 12,788,061 | ||||||
Building |
9,108,247 | 9,108,247 | ||||||
Land |
425,000 | 425,000 | ||||||
26,535,354 | 24,671,952 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
12,788,567 | 12,697,923 | ||||||
Net property and equipment |
$ | 13,746,787 | $ | 11,974,029 | ||||
(5) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2008 and 2007:
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 39,275,939 | $ | 31,051,202 | ||||
Non-amortizing other intangible assets: |
||||||||
Trade name |
1,190,559 | 1,190,559 | ||||||
Amortizing other intangible assets: |
||||||||
Customer related intangibles |
8,150,322 | 4,922,275 | ||||||
Trade name |
1,572,000 | 1,572,000 | ||||||
Total other intangible assets, |
10,912,881 | 7,684,834 | ||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
2,856,514 | 2,068,924 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
$ | 8,056,367 | $ | 5,615,910 | ||||
38
Table of Contents
The following represents a summary of changes in the Companys carrying amount of goodwill for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
Balance as of January 1, 2006 |
$ | 11,483,401 | ||
GHS purchase price adjustment related
to deferred taxes |
257,001 | |||
TGI acquisition |
18,221,635 | |||
Smaller World additional payment for
contingent consideration |
52,068 | |||
Foreign currency translation |
232 | |||
Balance as of December 31, 2006 |
$ | 30,014,337 | ||
Smaller World additional payment for
contingent consideration |
651,725 | |||
Foreign currency translation |
385,140 | |||
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
$ | 31,051,202 | ||
MIV acquisition |
8,833,477 | |||
Foreign currency translation |
(608,740 | ) | ||
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
$ | 39,275,939 | ||
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill and customer related intangibles for the year ended
December 31, 2008, included the impact of the foreign currency translation, MIV acquisition, and
purchase of customer contracts from SQ Strategies. During 2007 and 2006, additional payments were
made to Smaller World Communications for contingent consideration in accordance with the purchase
agreement. The purchase agreement included two scheduled payments of additional purchase price in
2006 and 2008 of $536,200 and $713,580 respectively, as a result of meeting certain revenue goals.
Trade names and customer related intangibles, consisting of customer relationships and surveys, are
being amortized over their estimated useful lives of five to fifteen years. On April 1, 2008,
approximately 10 customer contracts were purchased from SQ Strategies for $249,473. The recording
of this purchase increased customer related intangibles by $260,462 and deferred revenues by
$10,989.
Aggregate amortization expense for customer related intangibles and trade names for the year ended
December 31, 2008, was $851,000. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is:
2009$1,084,000; 2010$1,026,000; 2011$997,000; 2012$711,000; 2013$484,000; thereafter
$2,564,000.
(6) Income
Taxes
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, income before income taxes consists of the
following:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
U.S. Operations |
$ | 10,405,347 | $ | 9,664,081 | $ | 8,958,547 | ||||||
Foreign Operations |
1,577,218 | 1,453,303 | 547,208 | |||||||||
$ | 11,982,565 | $ | 11,117,384 | $ | 9,505,755 | |||||||
39
Table of Contents
Income tax expense consisted of the following components:
Current | Deferred | Total | ||||||||||
2008: | ||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 2,962,861 | $ | 350,161 | $ | 3,313,022 | ||||||
Foreign |
548,780 | (4,640 | ) | 544,140 | ||||||||
State |
595,704 | 84,838 | 680,542 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,107,345 | $ | 430,359 | $ | 4,537,704 | ||||||
2007: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 2,971,325 | $ | 65,159 | $ | 3,036,484 | ||||||
Foreign |
587,658 | (20,870 | ) | 566,788 | ||||||||
State |
602,751 | 72,349 | 675,100 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,161,734 | $ | 116,638 | $ | 4,278,372 | ||||||
2006: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 2,683,441 | $ | 109,575 | $ | 2,793,016 | ||||||
Foreign |
234,340 | (20,929 | ) | 213,411 | ||||||||
State |
604,718 | 10,542 | 615,260 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,522,499 | $ | 99,188 | $ | 3,621,687 | ||||||
The difference between the Companys income tax expense as reported in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and that which would be calculated applying the U.S. federal
income tax rate of 34% on pretax income was as follows:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Expected federal income taxes |
$ | 4,074,072 | $ | 3,779,911 | $ | 3,231,957 | ||||||
Foreign tax rate differential |
(7,925 | ) | 30,966 | 23,492 | ||||||||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
449,158 | 445,567 | 406,072 | |||||||||
Tax credits and incentives |
(51,488 | ) | (51,488 | ) | (36,938 | ) | ||||||
Other |
73,887 | 73,416 | (2,896 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,537,704 | $ | 4,278,372 | $ | 3,621,687 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 2007, were comprised of the following:
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ | 92,651 | $ | 27,383 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
231,262 | 204,280 | ||||||
Stock based compensation |
892,371 | 827,523 | ||||||
Other |
82,677 | | ||||||
Gross deferred tax assets |
1,298,961 | 1,059,186 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
243,260 | 164,652 | ||||||
Basis in property and equipment |
1,263,080 | 985,066 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
3,761,441 | 1,958,647 | ||||||
Other |
| 9,904 | ||||||
Gross deferred tax liabilities |
5,267,781 | 3,118,269 | ||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities |
$ | (3,968,820 | ) | $ | (2,059,083 | ) | ||
40
Table of Contents
The Company did not record a valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets because management
believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income
to fully realize these deferred tax benefits.
The undistributed earnings of the Companys foreign subsidiary of approximately $2.8 million are
considered to be indefinitely reinvested. Accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and state
income taxes or foreign withholding taxes have been provided for such undistributed earnings. It
is impractical to determine the additional income tax liability, if any, associated with the
repatriation of undistributed earnings.
(7) Notes Payable
Notes payable consisted of the following:
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Note payable to US Bank, interest
7.21% fixed rate,
scheduled principal payment ranging
from $88,000 - $94,000, final
payment of interest and principal
due May 31, 2013, secured by land,
building, accounts receivable and
intangible assets. Refinanced in
February 2008 at 5.14% fixed rate
with 17 monthly installments of
$92,821. |
| 2,993,352 | ||||||
Note payable to US Bank, interest
5.2% fixed rate, 35 scheduled
principal and interest payments of
$96,829, final balloon payment of
interest and principal due December
31, 2011, secured by land,
building, accounts receivable and
intangible assets. |
9,000,000 | | ||||||
Revolving credit note with US Bank,
subject to borrowing base of 75% of
eligible accounts receivable,
matures July 31, 2009, maximum
available $6.5 million |
3,850,000 | | ||||||
Capital leases |
89,741 | | ||||||
Other debt |
14,148 | | ||||||
Total notes payable |
12,953,889 | 2,993,352 | ||||||
Less current portion |
4,580,719 | 1,092,754 | ||||||
Note payable, net of current portion |
$ | 8,373,170 | $ | 1,900,598 | ||||
On May 26, 2006, the Company entered into a credit facility pursuant to which it borrowed $9.0
million under a term note and $3.5 million under a revolving credit note in order to partially
finance the acquisition of TGI. The term note was refinanced on February 25, 2008, for the
remaining balance of the term note of $1,602,675. The refinanced term note required payments of
principal and interest in 17 monthly installments of $92,821, beginning March 31, 2008, and ending
August 31, 2009. Borrowings under the refinanced term note bore interest at an annual rate of
5.14%. The Company made additional payments and paid off the term note in October 2008.
The maximum aggregate amount available under the revolving credit note was originally $3.5 million,
but an addendum to the revolving credit note dated March 26, 2008, changed the revolving credit
note amount to $6.5 million. The revolving credit note was renewed in July 2008 to extend the term
to July 31, 2009. The Company may borrow, repay and re-borrow amounts under the revolving credit
note from time to time until its maturity on July 31, 2009. The maximum aggregate amount available
under the revolving credit note is $6.5 million, subject to a borrowing base equal to 75% of the
Companys eligible accounts receivable. Borrowings under the revolving credit note bear interest
at a variable rate equal to (1) prime (as defined in the credit facility) less 0.50% or (2) one-,
two-, three-, six- or twelve-month LIBOR. The Company expects to extend the term of the revolving
credit note for at least one year
beyond the maturity date. As of December 31, 2008, the balance of the revolving credit note was
$3.9 million. According to borrowing base requirements, the Company had the capacity to borrow
another $600,000 as of December 31, 2008.
41
Table of Contents
On December 19, 2008, the Company borrowed $9.0 million under a term note to partially finance the
acquisition of MIV. The term note is payable in 35 equal installments of $96,829, with the balance
of principal and interest payable in a balloon payment due on December 31, 2011. Borrowings under
the term note bear interest at a rate of 5.2% per year.
The term note is secured by certain of the Companys assets, including the Companys land,
building, accounts receivable and intangible assets. The term note contains various restrictions
and covenants applicable to the Company, including requirements that the Company maintain certain
financial ratios at prescribed levels and restrictions on the ability of the Company to consolidate
or merge, create liens, incur additional indebtedness or dispose of assets. As of December 31,
2008, the Company was in compliance with these restrictions and covenants.
Debt acquired through the MIV acquisition included $89,741 in capital leases. The capital leases
are for production and mailing equipment meeting capitalization requirements where the lease term
exceeds more than 75% of the estimated useful life. The equipment is being depreciated over the
lease term of 4.25 years ending in 2011.
The aggregate maturities of the note payable and revolving credit notes for each of the five years
subsequent to December 31, 2008, are: 2009$4,580,719; 2010$775,034; 2011$7,598,136; 2012$0;
and 2013$0.
(8) Stock Option Plans
In August 2001, the Board of Directors adopted, and on May 1, 2002, the Companys shareholders
approved, the National Research Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (2001 Equity Incentive
Plan). The 2001 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the granting of stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares and other share-based awards and benefits
up to an aggregate of 600,000 shares of the Companys common stock. Options granted may be either
nonqualified or incentive stock options. Options vest over one to five years following the date of
grant and option terms are generally five to ten years following the date of grant. At December
31, 2008, there were 71,082 shares available for issuance pursuant to future grants under the 2001
Equity Incentive Plan. The Company has accounted for grants of 528,918 options under the 2001
Equity Incentive Plan using the date of grant as the measurement date for financial accounting
purposes.
In May 2004, the Board of Directors adopted, and on May 5, 2005, the Companys shareholders
approved the National Research Corporation 2004 Director Plan (the 2004 Director Plan). The 2004
Director Plan provides for the granting of options with respect to 250,000 shares of the Companys
common stock. The 2004 Director Plan provides for grants of nonqualified options to each director
of the Company who is not employed by the Company. In May 2004, each such director was granted an
option to purchase 11,000 shares of the Companys common stock. On the date of each subsequent
Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company, each such director, if re-elected or retained as a
director at such meeting, is granted an option to purchase 12,000 shares of the Companys common
stock. Options vest one year following the date of grant and option terms are generally ten years
following the date of grant, or three years in the case of termination of the outside director. At
December 31, 2008, there were 25,000 shares available for issuance pursuant to future grants under
the 2004 Director Plan. The Company has accounted for grants of 225,000 options under the 2004
Director Plan using the date of grant as the measurement date for financial accounting purposes.
42
Table of Contents
In February 2006, the Board of Directors adopted, and on May 4, 2006, the Companys shareholders
approved the National Research Corporation 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006 Equity Incentive
Plan). The 2006 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the granting of options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock, performance shares and other share-based awards and benefits up to an
aggregate of 600,000 shares of the Companys common stock. Options granted may be either incentive
stock options or nonqualified stock options. Vesting terms vary with each grant, and option terms
are generally five to ten years. Options vest over one to five years following the date of grant
and options terms are generally five to ten years following the date of grant. At December 31,
2008, there were 472,388 shares available for issuance pursuant to future grants under the 2006
Equity Incentive Plan. The Company has accounted for grants of 127,612 options under the 2006
Equity Incentive Plan using the date of grant as the measurement date for financial accounting
purposes.
The Company granted options to purchase 118,475, 131,382 and 128,862 shares of the Companys common
stock during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Options to purchase
shares of common stock were granted with exercise prices equal to the fair value of the common
stock on the date of grant. The fair value of stock options granted was estimated using a
Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Expected dividend yield at date of grant |
1.87-2.11 | % | 1.76-1.92 | % | 1.77-1.86 | % | ||||||
Expected stock price volatility |
21.1-24.2 | % | 22.7-29.9 | % | 25.0-39.0 | % | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
3.18 | % | 4.54-4.59 | % | 4.41-4.90 | % | ||||||
Expected life of options (in years) |
4.00 to 6.00 | 4.00 to 6.00 | 4.00 to 6.00 |
The risk-free interest rate assumptions were based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at
the time of the grant. The expected volatility was based on historical monthly price changes of
the Companys stock based on the expected life of the options at the date of grant. The expected
life of options is the average number of years the Company estimates that options will be
outstanding. The Company considers groups of associates that have similar historical exercise
behavior separately for valuation purposes.
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Companys 2001 and 2006 Equity
Incentive Plans and the 2004 Director Plan for the year ended December 31, 2008:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Options | Price | Terms (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
539,660 | $ | 17.04 | | | |||||||||||
Granted |
118,475 | $ | 27.87 | | | |||||||||||
Exercised |
(144,614 | ) | $ | 12.81 | | | ||||||||||
Canceled/expired |
(21,090 | ) | $ | 19.74 | | | ||||||||||
Outstanding at end of period |
492,431 | $ | 20.77 | 7.22 | $ | 3,716,132 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at end of period |
156,091 | $ | 18.85 | 6.68 | $ | 1,451,111 |
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, was $5.67, $6.39 and $6.02, respectively. The total intrinsic value of
stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, was $2.3 million,
$239,000 and $1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested stock option awards was approximately $1.0 million, which was expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 2.83 years.
43
Table of Contents
Cash received from stock options exercised for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
was $1,856,000, $338,000, and $926,000, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax
deduction from stock options exercised was $743,000, $92,000 and $405,000, for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company granted -0-, 32,115 and 13,218 non-vested shares of common
stock under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had 36,502
non-vested shares of common stock outstanding under the plan. These shares vest over one to five
years following the date of grant and holders thereof are entitled to receive dividends from the
date of grant, whether or not vested. The fair value of the awards is calculated as the fair
market value of the shares on the date of grant. The Company recognized $220,124, $436,820 and
$168,466 of non-cash compensation for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, related to this non-vested stock.
The following table summarizes information regarding non-vested stock granted to associates under
the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Shares | Grant Date Fair | |||||||
Outstanding | Value Per Share($) | |||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
66,183 | $ | 19.75 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Vested |
(21,700 | ) | $ | 17.94 | ||||
Forfeited |
(7,981 | ) | $ | 16.15 | ||||
Outstanding at end of period |
36,502 | $ | 21.62 | |||||
The total intrinsic value of non-vested stock awards vested during the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, was $614,000, $167,000 and $147,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2008,
the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards was approximately
$346,000 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.80 years.
(9) Leases
The Company leases printing equipment and services in the United States, and office space in
Canada, Wisconsin, Minnesota and California. The Company has recorded rent expense of $607,000,
$475,000 and $386,000 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Minimum lease payments under
noncancelable operating leases for each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2008 are:
2009$626,000; 2010$519,000; 2011$454,000; 2012$427,000; 2013$171,000.
The capital leases are for production and mailing equipment. The minimum lease payments for each
of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2008 are: 2009$37,044; 2010$37,044; 2011$27,783;
2012$ 0; 2013$0. Total minimum lease payments remaining are $101,871, with $12,130
representing interest as of December 31, 2008. The present value of the future minimum lease
payments are $89,741 less current maturities of $28,500. Long-term obligations under capital
leases total $61,241 as of December 31, 2008.
44
Table of Contents
(10) Related Party
A Board member of the Company also serves as a director of the Picker Institute. The Company
advanced $300,000 in each of 2004 and 2003 to the Picker Institute to fund designated research
projects and $171,000, $175,000 and $254,000 was expensed on research work during 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively. In addition, the Company is a party to a support services agreement with the
Picker Institute under which the Company conducts the annual NRC Picker Symposium. Under the support services
agreement, the Picker Institute receives a portion of the gross receipts of each Symposium, which
amounted to approximately $11,000 in 2008, $15,000 in 2007 and $12,000 in 2006.
A Board member of the Company also serves as an officer of Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. In
connection with the Companys regular assessment of its insurance-based associate benefits and the
costs associated therewith, which is conducted by an independent insurance broker, in 2007 the
Company began purchasing dental insurance for certain of its associates from Ameritas Life
Insurance Corp. and, in 2009, the Company also began purchasing vision insurance for certain of its
associates from Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. The total value of these purchases was $79,000,
$65,000 and $6,100 in 2008, 2007 and 2006 respectively.
(11) Associate Benefits
The Company sponsors a qualified 401(k) plan covering substantially all associates with no
eligibility service requirement. Under the 401(k) plan, the Company matches 25% of the first 6% of
compensation contributed by each associate. Employer contributions, which are discretionary, vest
to participants at a rate of 20% per year. The Company contributed $144,000, $127,000 and $124,000
in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, as a matching percentage of associate 401(k) contributions.
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), the
Companys management evaluated, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
the Companys Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2008. Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls
and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2008.
The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act). The Companys
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent
limitations, however, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies of procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting using the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on such evaluation, the Companys
management concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as
of December 31, 2008.
45
Table of Contents
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the quarter ended December 31, 2008, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Companys registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by the Companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only
managements report in this annual report.
Item 9B. Other Information
The Company has no other information to report pursuant to this item.
46
Table of Contents
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this Item with respect to directors and Section 16 compliance is
included under the captions Election of Directors and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance, respectively, in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement for its 2009
Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Proxy Statement) and is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Information with respect to the executive officers of the Company appears in Item 1 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. The information required by this Item with respect to audit committees and
audit committee financial experts is included under the caption Corporate Governance in the Proxy
Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of the Companys
associates, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller
and other persons performing similar functions. The Company has posted a copy of the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics on its website at
www.nationalresearch.com. The Company intends to
satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendments to, or waivers
from, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on its website at
www.nationalresearch.com. The Company is not including the information contained on its website as
part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this report.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is included under the captions Compensation Discussion and
Analysis, Summary Compensation Table, Grants of Plan-Based Awards, Outstanding Equity Awards
at December 31, 2008, Option Exercises and Stock Vested, Director Compensation and
Compensation Committee Report in the Proxy Statement and is hereby incorporated herein by
reference.
47
Table of Contents
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters |
The information required by this Item with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial
owners and management is included under the caption Principal Shareholders in the Proxy Statement
and is hereby incorporated by reference.
The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation plans under which equity
securities of the Company are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2008.
Number of securities to be | Number of securities remaining | |||||||||||
issued upon the exercise of | Weighted-average exercise | available for future issuance | ||||||||||
outstanding options, | price of outstanding | under equity compensation | ||||||||||
warrants and | options, | plans (excluding securities | ||||||||||
Plan Category | rights | warrants and rights | reflected in the first column) | |||||||||
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders (1) |
492,431 | $ | 20.77 | 568,470 | (2) | |||||||
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders |
| | | |||||||||
Total |
492,431 | $ | 20.77 | 568,470 | ||||||||
(1) | Includes the Companys 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, 2004 Director Plan, and the 2001
Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(2) | As of December 31, 2008, the Company had authority to award up to 160,436 additional
shares of restricted Common Stock to participants under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan,
provided that the total of such shares awarded may not exceed the total number of shares
remaining available for issuance under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, which totaled 71,082 as
of December 31, 2008. Under the 2004 Director Plan and 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, the
Company had authority to award up to 25,000 and 472,388 additional shares of restricted
Common Stock, respectively. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this Item is included under the caption Corporate
GovernanceTransactions with Related Persons in the Proxy Statement and is hereby incorporated by
reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this Item is included under the caption MiscellaneousIndependent
Registered Public Accounting Firm in the Proxy Statement and is hereby incorporated by reference.
48
Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) | 1. Consolidated financial statements The consolidated financial statements listed in the
accompanying index to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
2. | Financial statement schedule The financial statement schedule listed in the
accompanying index to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule is filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
3. | Exhibits The exhibits listed in the accompanying exhibit index are filed as
part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
49
Table of Contents
NATIONAL RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Balance at | Write-offs | Balance | ||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | MIV | Bad Debt | Net of | at End | ||||||||||||||||
of Year | Acquisition | Expense | Recoveries | of Year | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
$ | 103,183 | $ | | $ | (58,881 | ) | $ | | $ | 44,302 | |||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2007 |
$ | 44,302 | $ | | $ | 28,510 | $ | 2,600 | $ | 70,212 | ||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2008 |
$ | 70,212 | $ | 69,255 | $ | 167,449 | $ | 66,263 | $ | 240,653 |
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
50
Table of Contents
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
Page in this | ||||
Form 10-K | ||||
24 | ||||
25 | ||||
26 | ||||
27 | ||||
28 | ||||
29 | ||||
50 |
All other financial statement schedules are omitted since the required information is not present
or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules, or because the
information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
51
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on this 31st day of March 2009.
NATIONAL RESEARCH CORPORATION |
||||
By /s/ Michael D. Hays | ||||
Michael D. Hays | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Michael D. Hays
|
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
March 31, 2009 | ||
/s/ Patrick E. Beans
|
Vice President, Treasurer,
Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
March 31, 2009 | ||
/s/ JoAnn M. Martin
|
Director | March 31, 2009 | ||
/s/ John N. Nunnelly
|
Director | March 31, 2009 | ||
/s/ Paul C. Schorr III
|
Director | March 31, 2009 | ||
/s/ Gail L. Warden
|
Director | March 31, 2009 |
52
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Description | |
(3.1) | Articles of Incorporation of National Research Corporation, as
amended to date [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3.1) to
National Research Corporations Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-33273)] |
|
(3.2) | By-Laws of National Research Corporation, as amended to date
[Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3.2) to National Research
Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 10, 2007
(File No. 0-29466)] |
|
(4.1) | Installment or Single Payment Note, dated as of December 19,
2008, from National Research Corporation to U.S. Bank National
Association [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.1) to
National Research Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K dated
December 19, 2008 (File No. 0-294660)] |
|
(10.1)* | National Research Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan
[Incorporated by reference to National Research Corporations
Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3,
2002 (File No. 0-29466)] |
|
(10.2)* | National Research Corporation 2006 Equity Incentive Plan
[Incorporated by reference to National Research Corporations
Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3,
2006 (File No. 0-29466)] |
|
(10.3)* | National Research Corporation Director Stock Plan, as amended to
date [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to National
Research Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 0-29466)] |
|
(10.4)* | National Research Corporation 2004 Director Stock Plan
[Incorporated by reference to National Research Corporations
Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4,
2005 (File No. 0-29466)] |
|
(10.5)+ | Contract, dated January 23, 2002, between National Research
Corporation and the Department of Veterans Affairs [Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10.4) to National Research Corporations
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
(File No. 0-29466)] |
|
(10.6)* | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for new associates)
used in connection with the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan
[Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to National Research
Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration
No. 333-120530)] |
|
(10.7)* | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for officers) used
in connection with the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan [Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to National Research Corporations
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-120530)] |
|
(10.8)* | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for executive officers used in
connection with the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan [Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to National Research Corporations
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 19, 2005 (File No.
0-29466)] |
53
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Description | |
(10.9)* | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (one year vesting) used in
connection with the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan [Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 to National Research Corporations
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-120530)] |
|
(10.10)* | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (five year vesting) used in
connection with the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan [Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.7 to National Research Corporations
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-120530)] |
|
(10.11)* | Restricted Stock Incentive Plan for Joseph W. Carmichael, as
amended and restated, under the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan
[Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to National Research
Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 3, 2006
(File No. 0-29466)] |
|
(10.12)* | Directors Compensation Summary [Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit (10.1) to National Research Corporations Annual Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (File No.
0-29466)] |
|
(10.13)* | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit (10.14) to National Research Corporations Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No.
0-29466)] |
|
(10.14)* | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement used in connection with the
2006 Equity Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(10.15) to National Research Corporations Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-29466)] |
|
(10.15) | Merger Agreement, dated as of November 26, 2008, by and among
National Research Corporation, NRC Acquisition, Inc., My
Innerview, Inc., Neil L. Gulsvig and Janice L. Gulsvig
[Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.1) to National Research
Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 26, 2008
(File No. 0-29466)] |
|
(21.1) | Subsidiaries of National Research Corporation |
|
(23.1) | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
(31.1) | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
(31.2) | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
(32.1) | Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
(99.1) | Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to
be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2008 [To be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission under Regulation 14A
within 120 days after December 31, 2008; except to the extent
specifically incorporated by reference, the Proxy Statement for
the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K] |
|
* | A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
+ | Portions of this exhibit have been redacted and are subject to a confidential treatment
request filed with
the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The redacted material was filed separately with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
54