NaturalShrimp Inc - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark
One)
☒ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2017
or
☐TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from __________________________ to
__________________________
Commission
file number 000-54030
NATURALSHRIMP INCORPORATED
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
74-3262176
|
(State
or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
of
incorporation or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
15150 Preston Road, Suite 300, Dallas, TX 75248
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(888) 791-9474
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of Each Class
|
Name of
each exchange on which registered
|
None
|
N/A
|
Securities
registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
Shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001
(Title
of class)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
☐ No ☒
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
☐ No ☒
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No
☐
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer”, “smaller reporting company” and "emerging
growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
|
|
Emerging
growth company
|
☐
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which
the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price
of such common equity, as of the last business day of the
registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter
was $2,950,524.
(APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)
The
number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date was
92,408,298 shares of common stock as of June 26, 2017.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
PART I
|
|
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
|
4
|
|
|
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
|
13
|
|
|
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
22
|
|
|
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
|
22
|
|
|
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
22
|
|
|
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
22
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
23
|
|
|
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
26
|
|
|
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
26
|
|
|
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
34
|
|
|
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
34
|
|
|
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
34
|
|
|
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
35
|
|
|
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
|
36
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
|
38
|
|
|
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
41
|
|
|
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
43
|
|
|
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
44
|
|
|
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
46
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
48
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
50
|
3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K
includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect
management's current views with respect to future events and
financial performance. Forward-looking statements are
projections in respect of future events or our future financial
performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as “may,”
“should,” “expects,” “plans,”
“anticipates,” “believes,”
“estimates.” “predicts,”
“potential” or “continue” or the negative
of these terms or other comparable terminology. Those statements include statements
regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of us and
members of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which
such statements are based. Prospective investors are cautioned that
any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risk and uncertainties, and that actual
results may differ materially from those contemplated by such
forward-looking statements. These statements are only
predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors, including the risks in the section entitled
“Risk Factors” set forth in this Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 2017, any of which may cause our
company’s or our industry’s actual results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements to be materially different
from any future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements. These risks include, by way of example and without
limitation:
●
our ability to
successfully commercialize our shrimp farming operations to produce
a market-ready product in a timely manner and in enough
quantity;
●
absence of
contracts with customers or suppliers;
●
our ability to
maintain and develop relationships with customers and
suppliers;
●
our ability to
successfully integrate acquired businesses or new
brands;
●
the impact of
competitive products and pricing;
●
supply constraints
or difficulties;
●
the retention and
availability of key personnel;
●
general economic
and business conditions;
●
substantial doubt
about our ability to continue as a going concern;
●
our need to raise
additional funds in the future;
●
our ability to
successfully recruit and retain qualified personnel in order to
continue our operations;
●
our ability to
successfully implement our business plan;
●
our ability to
successfully acquire, develop or commercialize new products and
equipment;
●
the commercial
success of our products;
●
intellectual
property claims brought by third parties; and
●
the impact of any
industry regulation.
Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements
are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of
activity, or performance. Except as required by applicable law,
including the securities laws of the United States, we do not
intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform
these statements to actual results.
Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various
disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”). We undertake no obligation to update or revise
forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the
occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in the future
operating results over time except as required by law. We believe
that our assumptions are based upon reasonable data derived from
and known about our business and operations. No assurances are made
that actual results of operations or the results of our future
activities will not differ materially from our
assumptions.
4
As used
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and unless otherwise indicated,
the terms “Company,” “we,”
“us,” and “our” refer to NaturalShrimp
Incorporated and the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries:
NaturalShrimp Corporation, NaturalShrimp Global, Inc. and Natural
Aquatic Systems, Inc. Unless otherwise specified, all dollar
amounts are expressed in United States dollars.
Corporate History and Overview
We were
incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 3, 2008 under the name
“Multiplayer Online Dragon, Inc.” Effective November 5,
2010, we effected an 8 for 1 forward stock split, increasing the
issued and outstanding shares of our common stock from 12,000,000
shares to 96,000,000 shares. On October 29, 2014, we effected a 1
for 10 reverse stock split, decreasing the issued and outstanding
shares of our common stock from 97,000,000 to
9,700,000.
On
November 26, 2014, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the
“Agreement”) with NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc. a
Delaware corporation (“NSH”), pursuant to which we
agreed to acquire substantially all of the assets of NSH which
assets consisted primarily of all of the issued and outstanding
shares of capital stock of NaturalShrimp Corporation
(“NSC”), a Delaware corporation, and NaturalShrimp
Global, Inc. (“NS Global”), a Delaware corporation, and
certain real property located outside of San Antonio, Texas (the
“Assets”).
On
January 30, 2015, we consummated the acquisition of the Assets
pursuant to the Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the
Agreement, we issued 75,520,240 shares of our common stock to NSH
as consideration for the Assets. As a result of the transaction,
NSH acquired 88.62% of our issued and outstanding shares of common
stock; NSC and NS Global became our wholly-owned subsidiaries, and
we changed our principal business to a global shrimp farming
company.
In
connection with our receipt of approval from the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), effective March 3,
2015, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to change our name
to “NaturalShrimp Incorporated.”
We are
a biotechnology company and have developed a proprietary technology
that allows us to grow Pacific White shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei,
formerly Penaeus vannamei) in an ecologically controlled,
high-density, low-cost environment, and in fully contained and
independent production facilities. Our system uses technology which
allows us to produce a naturally-grown shrimp “crop”
weekly, and accomplishes this without the use of antibiotics or
toxic chemicals. We have developed several proprietary technology
assets, including a knowledge base that allows us to produce
commercial quantities of shrimp in a closed system with a computer
monitoring system that automates, monitors and maintains proper
levels of oxygen, salinity and temperature for optimal shrimp
production. Our initial production facility is located outside of
San Antonio, Texas.
NS
Global, a wholly owned subsidiary of NaturalShrimp Incorporated.,
owns approximately 10% of NaturalShrimp International A.S. in
Europe. Our European-based partner, NaturalShrimp International
A.S., Oslo, Norway is responsible for the construction cost of
their facility and initial operating capital.
The
first facility built in Spain for NaturalShrimp International A.S.
is GambaNatural de España, S.L. The land for the first
facility was purchased in Medina del Campo, Spain and construction
of the 75,000 sq. ft. facility and was completed in 2015. Medina
del Campo is approximately seventy-five miles northwest of Madrid,
Spain.
Since
the middle of 2015, we have continued to develop our indoor shrimp
production system. In addition, during 2016, we engaged in
additional engineering projects with third parties to further
enhance our indoor production capabilities. We are also working on
expanding our intellectual property with respect to such additional
enhancements. At this time, we don’t expect commercial
production until late calendar 2017, which would be limited. When
production does commence, wholesale prices for the shrimp produced
by the Company are expected to be between $9.00 to $12.00 per pound
F.O.B, based on preliminary estimates.
5
On
October 16, 2015, we formed Natural Aquatic Systems, Inc.
(“NAS”). The purpose of the NAS is to formalize the
business relationship between NaturalShrimp Incorporated and
F&T Water Solutions LLC for the joint development of certain
water technologies. The technologies shall include, but are not
limited to, any and all inventions, patents, intellectual property
and know-how dealing with enclosed aquatic production systems
worldwide. This includes construction, operation, and management of
enclosed aquatic production, other than shrimp, facilities
throughout the world, co-developed by both parties at our facility
located outside of La Coste, Texas.
Overview of Industry
Shrimp
is a well-known and globally-consumed commodity, constituting one
of the most important types of seafood and a staple protein source
for much of the world. According to the USDA Foreign Agricultural
Service, the world consumes approximately 9 billion pounds of
shrimp annually with over 1.3 billion pounds consumed in the United
States alone. Approximately 65% of the global supply of shrimp is
caught by ocean trawlers and the other 35% is produced by open-air
shrimp farms, mostly in developing countries.
Shrimp
boats catch shrimp through the use of large, boat-towed nets. These
nets are quite toxic to the undersea environment as they disturb
and destroy ocean-bottom ecosystems; these nets also catch a
variety of non-shrimp sea life, which is typically killed and
discarded as part of the shrimp harvesting process. Additionally,
the world’s oceans can only supply a finite amount of shrimp
each year, and in fact, single-boat shrimp yields have fallen by
approximately 20% since 2010 and continue to decrease. The
shrimping industry’s answer to this problem has been to
deploy more (and larger) boats that deploy ever-larger nets, which
has in the short-term been successful at maintaining global shrimp
yields. However, this benefit cannot continue forever, as
eventually global demand has the potential of outstripping the
oceans’ ability to maintain the natural ecosystem’s
balance, resulting in a permanent decline in yields. When taken in
light of global population growth and the ever-increasing demand
for nutrient-rich foods such as shrimp, this is clearly an
unsustainable production paradigm.
Shrimp
farming, known in the industry as “aquaculture,” has
ostensibly stepped in to fill this demand/supply imbalance. Shrimp
farming is typically done in open-air lagoons and man-made shrimp
ponds connected to the open ocean. Because these ponds constantly
exchange water with the adjacent sea, the farmers are able to
maintain the water chemistry that allows the shrimp to prosper.
However, this method of cultivating shrimp also carries severe
ecological peril. First of all, most shrimp farming is primarily
conducted in developing countries, where poor shrimp farmers have
little regard for the global ecosystem. Because of this, these
farmers use large quantities of antibiotics and other chemicals
that maximize each farm’s chance of producing a crop, putting
the entire system at risk. For example, a viral infection that
crops up in one farm can spread to all nearby farms, quite
literally wiping out an entire region’s production. In 1999,
the White Spot virus invaded shrimp farms in at least five Latin
American countries: Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Panama and
Ecuador and in 2013-14 EMS (Early Mortality Syndrome) wiped out
most of the Asia Pacific region and Mexico. Secondly, there is also
a finite amount of coastline that can be used for shrimp production
– eventually shrimp farms that are dependent on the open
ocean will have nowhere to expand. Again, this is an ecologically
damaging and ultimately unsustainable system for producing
shrimp.
In both
the cases, the current method of shrimp production is
unsustainable. As global populations rise and the demand for shrimp
continues to grow, the current system is bound to fall short.
Shrimp trawling cannot continue to increase production without
completely depleting the oceans’ natural shrimp population.
Trends in per-boat yield confirm that this industry has already
crossed the overfishing threshold, putting the global open-ocean
shrimp population in decline. While open-air shrimp aquaculture may
seem to address this problem, it is also an unsustainable system
that destroys coastal ecological systems and produces shrimp with
very high chemical contamination levels. Closed-system shrimp
farming is clearly a superior alternative, but its unique
challenges have prevented it from becoming a widely-available
alternative – until now.
Of the
1.7 billion pounds of shrimp consumed annually in the United
States, over 1.3 billion pounds are imported – much of this
from developing countries’ shrimp farms. These farms are
typically located in developing countries and use high levels of
antibiotics and pesticides that are not allowed under USDA
regulations. As a result, these shrimp farms produce chemical-laden
shrimp in an ecologically unsustainable way.
6
Unfortunately, most
consumers here in the United States are not aware of the origin of
their store-bought shrimp or worse, that which they consume in
restaurants. This is due to a USDA rule that states that only
bulk-packaged shrimp must state the shrimp’s country of
origin; any “prepared” shrimp, which includes
arrangements sold in grocery stores and seafood markets, as well as
all shrimp served in restaurants, can simply be sold “as
is.” Essentially, this means that most U.S. consumers may be
eating shrimp laden with chemicals and antibiotics.
NaturalShrimp’s product is free of pesticide chemicals and
antibiotics, a fact that we believe is highly attractive and
beneficial in terms of our eventual marketing success.
Our Business
NaturalShrimp
Incorporated is a global shrimp farming and biotechnology company
that has developed a technology to produce shrimp in an indoor,
re-circulating, saltwater facility. Our eco-friendly, bio-secure
design does not rely on ocean water; it recreates the natural ocean
environment allowing for high-density production which can be
replicated anywhere in the world.
Our
self-contained shrimp aquaculture system allows for the production
of Pacific White (Litopenaeus vannamei, formerly Penaeus vannamei)
shrimp in an ecologically-controlled, fully-contained and
independent production system without the use of antibiotics or
toxic chemicals.
The
Company has developed several proprietary technology assets,
including a knowledge base that allows the production of commercial
quantities of shrimp in a closed system with a computer monitoring
system that automates, monitors and maintains proper levels of
oxygen, salinity and temperature for optimal shrimp
production.
Our
research and development facilities are located outside of San
Antonio, Texas, and we hold a minority interest in a Norwegian
company that owns and operates a similar shrimp production facility
in Medina del Campo, Spain.
Technology
Intensive, Indoor, Closed-System Shrimp Production
Technology
Historically,
efforts to raise shrimp in a high-density, closed system at the
commercial level have been met with either modest success or
outright failure through “BioFloc Technology”.
Infectious agents such as parasites, bacteria and viruses are the
most damaging and most difficult to control. Bacterial infection
can in some cases be combated through the use of antibiotics
(although not always), and in general, the use of antibiotics is
considered undesirable and counter to “green”
cultivation practices. Viruses can be even worse, in that they are
immune to antibiotics. Once introduced to a shrimp population,
viruses can wipe out entire farms and shrimp populations, even with
intense probiotic applications.
Our
primary solution against infectious agents is our “Vibrio
Suppression Technology”. We believe this system creates
higher sustainable densities, consistent production, improved
growth and survival rates and improved food conversion without the
use of antibiotics, probiotics or unhealthy anti-microbial
chemicals. Vibrio Suppression Technology helps to exclude and
suppress harmful organisms that usually destroy
“BioFloc” and other enclosed technologies.
Automated Monitoring and Control System
The
Company’s “Automated Monitoring and Control
System” uses individual tank monitors to automatically
control the feeding, oxygenation, and temperature of each of the
facility tanks independently. In addition, a facility computer
running custom software communicates with each of the controllers
and performs additional data acquisition functions that can report
back to a supervisory computer from anywhere in the world. These
computer-automated water controls optimize the growing conditions
for the shrimp as they mature to harvest size, providing a
disease-resistant production environment.
7
The
principal theories behind the Company’s system are
characterized as:
●
High-density shrimp
production
●
Weekly
production
●
Natural ecology
system
●
Regional
production
●
Regional
distribution
These
principles form the foundation for the Company and our potential
distributors so that consumers can be provided with continuous
volumes of live and fresh shrimp at competitive
prices.
Research and Development
In
2001, the Company began research and development (R&D) of a
high density, natural aquaculture system that is not dependent on
ocean water to provide quality, fresh shrimp every week, fifty-two
weeks a year. The initial NaturalShrimp system was successful but
the Company determined that it would not be economically feasible
due to high operating costs. Over the next several years, using the
knowledge we gained from the first R&D system, we developed a
shrimp production system that eliminated the high costs associated
with the previous system. We have continued to refine this
technology, eliminating bacteria and other problems that affect
enclosed systems and now have a successful shrimp growing
process.
We have
produced thousands of pounds of shrimp over the last few years in
order to develop a design that will consistently produce quality
shrimp that grow to a large size at a specific rate of growth. This
included experimenting with various types of natural live and
synthesized feed supplies before selecting the most appropriate
nutritious and reliable combination. It also included utilizing
monitoring and control automation equipment to minimize labor costs
and to provide the necessary oversight for proper regulation of the
shrimp environment.
After
the implementation of the first R&D facility in La Coste,
Texas, the Company has also made significant improvements that
minimize the transfer of shrimp, which will reduce shrimp stress
and labor costs. Our current system consists of a reception tank
where the shrimp are acclimated, then moved to a larger grow-out
tank for the rest of the twenty-week cycle.
On
September 7, 2016, we entered into a Letter of Commitment with
Trane, Inc. (“Trane”), a division of Ingersoll-Rand
Plc, whereby Trane shall proceed with a detailed audit to use data
to verify the capabilities of an initial Phase 1 prototype of a
Trane-proposed three tank system at our La Coste, Texas facility.
The prototype consists of a modified Electrocoagulation (EC) system
for the human grow-out, harvesting and processing of fully mature,
antibiotic-free Pacific White Leg shrimp. Trane is authorized to
proceed with such detailed audit to utilize data for purposes of
verifying the capabilities of the EC system, including the ammonia
and chlorine capture and sequestering and pathogen kill. The
detailed audit shall deliver (i) a report on the inspection of the
existing infrastructure determining if proper fit, adequate
security, acceptable utility service, environmental protection and
equipment sizing are achievable; (ii) provide firm fixed pricing
for the EC system, electrode selection and supply, waste removal,
ventilation of the off-gassing of the equipment; and (iii) a
formalized plan for commissioning and on-site investigation of
hardware design to simplify build-out of Phase 2 and future phases.
The detailed audit and design is expected to be completed during
our fiscal second quarter. Management expects to utilize the
results of the detailed audit as part of the Company’s
financing and underwriting package at the Company's La Coste, Texas
facility. Installation of the system is expected to be provided by
an outside general contractor, and lease financing for the system
is expected to be provided by an outside leasing firm.
Target Markets and Sales Price
Our
goal is to establish production systems and distribution centers in
metropolitan areas of the United States, as well as international
distribution networks through joint venture partnerships throughout
the world. This should allow the Company to capture a significant
portion of world shrimp sales by offering locally grown,
environmentally “green,” naturally grown, fresh shrimp
at competitive wholesale prices.
8
The
United States population is approximately 313 million people with
an annual shrimp consumption of 1.3 billion pounds, of which less
than 400 million pounds are domestically produced. According to
IndexMundi.com, the wholesale price for frozen, commodity grade
shrimp has risen 15% since January 2015 (shell-on headless, 26-30
count; which is comparable to our target growth size). With world
shrimp problems, this price is expected to rise more in the next
few years.
We
strive to build a profitable global shrimp production company. We
believe our foundational advantage is that we can deliver fresh,
organically grown, gourmet-grade shrimp, 52 weeks a year to retail
and wholesale buyers in major market areas at competitive, yet
premium prices. By locating regional production and distribution
centers in close proximity to consumer demand, we can provide a
fresh product to customers within 24 hours after harvest, which is
unique in the shrimp industry. We can be the “first to
market” and perhaps “sole weekly provider” of
fresh shrimp and capture as much market share as production
capacity can support.
For
those customers that want a frozen product, we may be able to
provide this in the near future and the product will still be
differentiated as a “naturally grown, sustainable
seafood” that will meet the increasing demand of socially
conscious consumers.
Our
patented technology and eco-friendly, bio-secure production
processes enable the delivery of a chemical and antibiotic free,
locally grown product that lives up to the Company’s mantra:
“Always Fresh, Always Natural,” thereby solving the
issue of “unsafe” imported seafood.
Product Description
Nearly
all of the shrimp consumed today are shipped frozen. Shrimp are
typically frozen from six to twenty-four months before consumption.
Our system is designed to harvest a different tank each week, which
provides for fresh shrimp throughout the year. We strive to create
a niche market of “Always Fresh, Always Natural”
shrimp. As opposed to many of the foreign shrimp farms, we can also
claim that our product is 100% free of antibiotics. The ability to
grow shrimp locally, year round allows us to provide this high-end
product to specialty grocery stores and upscale restaurants
throughout the world. We rotate the stocking and harvesting of our
tanks each week, which allows for weekly shrimp harvests. Our
product is free of all pollutants and is fed only all-natural
feeds.
The
seafood industry lacks a consistent “Source
Verification” method to track seafood products as they move
through countries and customs procedures. With worldwide
overfishing leading to declining shrimp freshness and
sustainability around the world, it is vital for shrimp providers
to be able to realistically identify the source of their product.
We have well-managed, sustainable facilities that are able to track
shrimp from hatchery to plate using environmentally responsible
methods.
Shrimp Growth Period
Our
production system is designed to produce shrimp at a harvest size
of twenty-one to twenty-five shrimp per pound in a period of
twenty-four weeks. The Company currently purchases post-larva
shrimp that are approximately ten days old (PL 10). In the future,
we plan to build our own hatcheries to control the supply of shrimp
to each of our facilities. Our full-scale production systems
include grow-out and nursery tanks, projected to produce fresh
shrimp fifty-two weeks per year.
Distribution and Marketing
We plan
to build these environmentally “green” production
systems near major metropolitan areas of the United States. Today,
we have one pilot production facility in La Coste, Texas (near San
Antonio) and plan to begin construction of a full-scale production
facility in La Coste and plans for Nevada and New York. Over the
next five years, our plan is to increase construction of new
facilities each year. In the fifth year, we plan for a new system
to be completed each month, expanding first into the largest shrimp
consumption markets of the United States.
Unique Product
We plan
to sell and distribute the vast majority of our shrimp production
through distributors which have established customers and
sufficient capacity to deliver a fresh product within hours
following harvest. We believe we have the added advantage of being
able to market our shrimp as fresh, natural and locally grown using
sustainable, eco-friendly technology, a key differentiation from
all existing shrimp producers. Furthermore, we believe that our
ability to advertise our product in this manner along with the fact
that it is a locally grown product, provides us with a marketing
advantage over the competition.
9
Harvesting, Packaging and Shipment
Each
location is projected to include production, harvesting/processing
and a general shipping and receiving area, in addition to
warehousing space for storage of necessary supplies and products
required to grow, harvest, package and otherwise make ready for
delivery, a fresh shrimp crop on a weekly basis to consumers in
each individual market area within 24 hours following
harvest.
The
seafood industry lacks a consistent source verification method to
track seafood products as they move through countries and customs
procedures. With worldwide overfishing leading to declining shrimp
freshness and sustainability around the world, it is vital for
shrimp providers to be able to realistically identify the source of
their product. Our future facilities will be designed to track
shrimp from hatchery to plate using environmentally responsible
methods.
International
We own
one hundred percent of NaturalShrimp Global, Inc. which was formed
to create international partnerships. Each international
partnership is expected to use the Company’s proprietary
technology to penetrate shrimp markets throughout the world
utilizing existing food service distribution channels.
Because
our system is enclosed and also indoors, it is not affected by
weather or climate and does not depend on ocean proximity. As such,
we believe we will be able to provide, naturally grown,
high-quality, fresh shrimp to major market customers each week.
This will allow distribution companies to leverage their existing
customer relationships by offering an uninterrupted supply of high
quality, fresh and locally grown shrimp. We will utilize
distributors that currently supply fresh seafood to upscale
restaurants, country clubs, specialty super markets and retail
stores whose clientele expect and appreciate fresh, natural
products.
NaturalShrimp
Global, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NaturalShrimp
Incorporated., owns a percentage of NaturalShrimp International
A.S. in Europe. Our European-based partner, NaturalShrimp
International A.S., Oslo, Norway is responsible for the
construction cost of their facility and initial operating
capital.
The
first facility built in Spain for NaturalShrimp International A.S.
is GambaNatural de España, S.L. The land for the first
facility was purchased in Medina del Campo, Spain and construction
of the 75,000 sq. ft. facility was completed in 2016. Medina del
Campo is approximately seventy-five miles northwest of Madrid,
Spain.
We will
seek potential partners throughout open territories as we are able
to obtain the adequate funding to complete the first two facilities
at the La Coste location.
Go to Market Strategy and Execution
Our
strategy is to develop regional production and distribution centers
near major metropolitan areas throughout the United States and
internationally. Today, we have 53,000 sq. ft. of R&D
facilities, which includes, a pilot production system,
greenhouse/reservoirs and utility buildings in La Coste, TX (near
San Antonio). We intend to begin construction of a new
free-standing facility with the next generation shrimp production
system in place on the property in 2018.
The
reasoning behind building additional shrimp production systems in
La Coste is availability of trained production personnel, our
research and development team, and an opportunity to develop the
footprint and model for additional facilities. Our current plan is
to develop six regional production and distribution centers near
major markets in 2019, adding one system per month in a selected
production center, depending on market demand.
We have
sold product to restaurants at $12.00 per pound and to retail
consumers at $16.50 to $21.00 per pound, depending on size, which
helps to validate our pricing strategy. Additionally, from 2011 to
2013, we had two successful North Texas test markets which
distributed thousands of pounds of fresh product to customers
within 24 hours following harvest. The fresh product was priced
from $8.40 to $12.00 per pound wholesale, heads on, net price to
the Company.
10
Current Systems and Expansion
The
pilot system is located in La Coste, Texas and is being retrofitted
with new technology that the Company has been developing with Trane
in connection with the engineering audit being conducted by Trane.
This facility is projected to produce approximately 6,000 pounds
every month. The next facility in La Coste will be substantially
larger than the current system. The target yield of shrimp for the
new facility will be approximately 6,000 pounds per week. Both
facilities combined are projected to produce over 7,000 pounds of
shrimp per week in La Coste. By staging the stocking and harvests
from tank to tank, it enables us to produce weekly and therefore
deliver fresh shrimp every week.
After
the completion of the next system in La Coste, our long-term plan
is to build additional production systems in Las Vegas, Chicago and
New York. These locations are targeted to begin construction in
fiscal 2019, and the funding for these plans are projected to come
from profits, agricultural guaranty programs, and investors. These
cities are not surrounded by commercial shrimp production and we
believe there will be a high demand for fresh shrimp in all of
these locations. In addition, the Company will continue to use the
land it owns in La Coste to build as many systems as the Texas
market demands.
Competition
There
are a number of companies conducting research and development
projects in their attempt to develop closed-system technologies in
the U.S., some with reported production and sales. Florida Organic
Aquaculture uses a Bio-Floc Raceway System to intensify shrimp
growth, while Marvesta Shrimp Farms tanks in water from the
Atlantic to use in their indoor system. Since these are
privately-held companies, it is not possible to know, with
certainty, their state of technical development, production
capacity, need for water exchange, location requirements, financial
status and other matters. To the best of our knowledge, none are
producing significant quantities of shrimp relative to their local
markets, and such fresh shrimp sales are likely confined to an area
near the production facility.
Additionally, any
new competitor would face significant barriers for entry into the
market and would likely need years of research and development to
develop the proprietary technology necessary to produce similar
shrimp at a commercially viable level. We believe our technology
and business model sets us apart from any current competition. It
is possible that additional competitors will arise in the future,
but with the size and growth of the worldwide shrimp market, many
competitors could co-exist and thrive in the fresh shrimp
industry.
Intellectual Property
We
intend to take appropriate steps to protect our intellectual
property. We have registered the trademark
“NATURALSHRIMP” which has been approved and was
published in the Official Gazette on June 5, 2012. There are
potential technical processes for which the Company may be able to
file a patent. However, there are no assurances that such
applications, if filed, would be issued and no right of enforcement
is granted to a patent application. Therefore, the Company has
filed a provisional patent with the U.S. Patent Office and plans to
use a variety of other methods, including copyright registrations
as appropriate, trade secret protection, and confidentiality and
non-compete agreements to protect its intellectual property
portfolio.
Source and Availability of Raw Materials
Raw
materials are received in a timely manner from established
suppliers. Currently, we buy our feed from Zeigler, a leading
producer of aquatic feed. Post larvae (“PL”) shrimp are
purchased from Shrimp Improvement Systems (SIS) in Florida and
Global Blue Technologies in Texas.
There
have not been any issues regarding the availability of our raw
materials. We have favorable contacts and past business dealings
with other major shrimp feed producers if current suppliers are not
available.
Government Approvals and Regulations
We are
subject to government regulation and require certain licenses. The
following list includes regulations to which we are subject and/or
the permits and licenses we currently hold:
11
●
Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department (TPWD) - “Exotic species permit” to
raise exotic shrimp (non-native to Texas). The La Coste facility is
north of the coastal shrimp exclusion zone (east and south of H-35,
where it intersects Hwy 21 down to Laredo) and therefore outside of
TPWD’s major area of concern for exotic shrimp. Currently
Active - Expires December 31, 2017.
●
Texas Department of
Agriculture (TDA) - “Aquaculture License” for
aquaculture production facilities. License to “operate a fish
farm or cultured fish processing plant.” Currently Active
– Expires June 30, 2018.
●
Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) - Regulates facility wastewater
discharge. According to the TCEQ permit classification system, we
are rated Level 1 – Recirculation system with no discharge.
Currently Active – No expiration.
●
San Antonio River
Authority - No permit required, but has some authority over any
effluent water that could impact surface and ground
waters.
●
OSHA - No permit
required but has right to inspect facility.
●
HACCP (Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Point) - Not needed unless we process
shrimp on site. Training and preparation of HACCP plans remain to
be completed. There are multiple HACCP plans listed at
http://seafood.ucdavis.edu/haccp/Plans.htm and other web sites that
can be used as examples.
●
Texas Department of
State Health Services - Food manufacturer license #
1011080.
●
Aquaculture
Certification Council (ACC) and Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP) -
Provide shrimp production certification for shrimp marketing
purposes to mainly well-established vendors. ACC and BAP
certifications require extensive record keeping. No license is
required at this time.
We are
subject to certain regulations regarding the need for field
employees to be certified. We strictly adhere to these regulations.
The cost of certification is an accepted part of expenses.
Regulations may change and become a cost burden, but compliance and
safety are our main concern.
Market Advantages and Corporate Drivers
The
following are what we consider to be our advantages in the
marketplace:
●
Early-mover
Advantage: Commercialized technology in a large growing market with
no significant competition yet identified. Most are early stage
start-ups or early stage companies with limited production and
distribution.
●
Farm-to-Market:
This has significant advantages including reduced transportation
costs and a product that is more attractive to local
consumers.
●
Bio-secured
Building: Our process is a re-circulating, highly-filtered water
technology in an indoor-regulated environment. External pathogens
are excluded.
●
Eco-friendly
“Green” Technology: Our closed-loop, re-circulating
system has no ocean water exchange requirements, does not use
chemical or antibiotics and therefore is sustainable, eco-friendly,
environmentally sound and produces a superior quality shrimp that
is totally natural.
●
Availability of
Weekly Fresh Shrimp: Assures consumers of optimal freshness, taste,
and texture of product which will command premium
prices.
●
Sustainability: Our
naturally grown product does not deplete wild supplies, has no
by-catch kill of marine life, does not damage sensitive ecological
environments and avoids potential risks of imported
seafood.
Subsidiaries
The
Company has three wholly-owned subsidiaries including NaturalShrimp
Corporation, NaturalShrimp Global, Inc. and Natural Aquatic
Systems, Inc.
Employees
As of
March 31, 2017, we had 4 full-time employees. We intend to hire
additional staff and to engage consultants in general
administration on an as-needed basis. We also intend to engage
experts in general business to advise us in various
capacities.
12
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You
should carefully consider the risks described below together with
all of the other information included in our public filings before
making an investment decision with regard to our securities. The
statements contained in or incorporated into this document that are
not historic facts are forward-looking statements that are subject
to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those set forth in or implied by
forward-looking statements. If any of the following events
described in these risk factors actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or results of operations could be harmed. In
that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and
you may lose all or part of your investment. Moreover, additional
risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem less
significant also may impact our business, financial condition or
results of operations, perhaps materially. For additional
information regarding risk factors, see Item 1 –
“Forward-Looking Statements.”
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
The
market for our product may be limited, and as a result our business
may be adversely affected.
The
feasibility of marketing our product has been assumed to this point
and there can be no assurance that such assumptions are correct. It
is possible that the costs of development and implementation of our
shrimp production technology may be too expensive to market our
shrimp at a competitive price. It is likewise possible that
competing technologies will be introduced into the marketplace
before or after the introduction of our product to the market,
which may affect our ability to market our product at a competitive
price.
Furthermore, there
can be no assurance that the prices we determine to charge for our
product will be commercially acceptable or that the prices that may
be dictated by the market will be sufficient to provide to us
sufficient revenues to profitably operate and provide a financial
return to our investors.
Our
business and operations are affected by the volatility of prices
for shrimp.
Our
business, prospects, revenues, profitability and future growth are
highly dependent upon the prices of and demand for shrimp. Our
ability to borrow and to obtain additional capital on attractive
terms is also substantially dependent upon shrimp prices. These
prices have been and are likely to continue to be extremely
volatile for seasonal, cyclical and other reasons. Any substantial
or extended decline in the price of shrimp will have a material
adverse effect on our financing capacity and our prospects for
commencing and sustaining any economic commercial production. In
addition, increased availability of imported shrimp can affect our
business by lowering commodity prices. This could reduce the value
of inventories, held both by us and by our customers, and cause
many of our customers to reduce their orders for new products until
they can dispose of their higher cost inventories.
Market
demand for our products may decrease.
We face
competition from other producers of seafood as well as from other
protein sources, such as pork, beef and poultry. The bases on which
we expect to compete include, but may not be limited
to:
●
price;
●
product
quality;
●
brand
identification; and
●
customer
service.
Demand
for our products will be affected by our competitors’
promotional spending. We may be unable to compete successfully on
any or all of these bases in the future, which may have a material
adverse effect on our revenues and results of
operations.
Moreover, although
historically the logistics and perishability of seafood has led to
regionalized competition, the market for fresh and frozen seafood
is becoming increasingly globalized as a result of improved
delivery logistics and improved preservation of the products.
Increased competition, consolidation, and overcapacity may lead to
lower product pricing of competing products that could reduce
demand for our products and have a material adverse effect on our
revenues and results of operations.
13
Competition and
unforeseen limited sources of supplies in the industry may result
in occasional spot shortages of equipment, supplies and materials.
In particular, we may experience possible unavailability of
post-larvae and materials and services used in our shrimp
production facilities. Such unavailability could result in
increased costs and delays to our operations. If we cannot find the
products, equipment, supplies and materials that we need on a
timely basis, we may have to suspend our production plans until we
find the products, equipment and materials that we
need.
If
we lose our key management and technical personnel, our business
may be adversely affected.
In
carrying out our operations, we will rely upon a small group of key
management and technical personnel including our Chief Executive
Officer, Chairman of the Board and President and Chief Financial
Officer. We do not currently maintain any key man insurance. An
unexpected partial or total loss of the services of these key
individuals could be detrimental to our business.
Our
expansion plans for our shrimp production facilities reflects our
current intent and is subject to change.
Our
current plans regarding expansion of our shrimp production
facilities are subject to change. Whether we ultimately undertake
our expansion plans will depend on the following factors, among
others:
●
availability and
cost of capital;
●
current and future
shrimp prices;
●
costs and
availability of post-larvae shrimp, equipment, supplies and
personnel necessary to conduct these operations;
●
success or failure
of system design and activities in similar areas;
●
changes in the
estimates of the costs to complete production facilities;
and
●
decisions of
operators and future joint venture partners.
We will
continue to gather data about our production facilities, and it is
possible that additional information may cause us to alter our
schedule or determine that a certain facility should not be pursued
at all.
Our
product is subject to regulatory approvals and if we fail to obtain
such approvals, our business may be adversely
affected.
Most of
the jurisdictions in which we operate will require us to obtain a
license for each facility owned and operated in that jurisdiction.
We have obtained and currently hold a license to own and operate
each of our facilities where a license is required. In order to
maintain the licenses, we have to operate our current farms and, if
we pursue acquisitions or construction of new farms, we will need
to obtain additional licenses to operate those farms, where
required. We are also exposed to dilution of the value of our
licenses where a government issues new licenses to fish farmers
other than us, thereby reducing the current value of our fish
farming licenses. Governments may change the way licenses are
distributed or otherwise dilute or invalidate our licenses. If we
are unable to maintain or obtain new fish farming licenses or if
new licensing regulations dilute the value of our licenses, this
may have a material adverse effect on our business.
It is
possible that regulatory authorities could make changes in
regulatory rules and policies and we would not be able to market or
commercialize our product in the intended manner and/or the changes
could adversely impact the realization of our technology or market
potential.
Failure
to ensure food safety and compliance with food safety standards
could result in serious adverse consequences for us.
As our
end products are for human consumption, food safety issues (both
actual and perceived) may have a negative impact on the reputation
of and demand for our products. In addition to the need to comply
with relevant food safety regulations, it is of critical importance
that our products are safe and perceived as safe and healthy in all
relevant markets.
14
Our
products may be subject to contamination by food-borne pathogens,
such as Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridia, Salmonella and E. Coli
or contaminants. These pathogens and substances are found in the
environment; therefore, there is a risk that one or more of these
organisms and pathogens can be introduced into our products as a
result of improper handling, poor processing hygiene or
cross-contamination by us, the ultimate consumer or any
intermediary. We have little, if any, control over handling
procedures once we ship our products for distribution. Furthermore,
we may not be able to prevent contamination of our shrimp by
pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, dioxins or
heavy metals.
An
inadvertent shipment of contaminated products may be a violation of
law and may lead to product liability claims, product recalls
(which may not entirely mitigate the risk of product liability
claims), increased scrutiny and penalties, including injunctive
relief and plant closings, by regulatory agencies, and adverse
publicity.
Increased quality
demands from authorities in the future relating to food safety may
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations or cash flow. Legislation and
guidelines with tougher requirements are expected and may imply
higher costs for the food industry. In particular, the ability to
trace products through all stages of development, certification and
documentation is becoming increasingly required under food safety
regulations. Further, limitations on additives and use of medical
products in the farmed shrimp industry may be imposed, which could
result in higher costs for us.
The
food industry, in general, experiences high levels of customer
awareness with respect to food safety and product quality,
information and traceability. We may fail to meet new and exacting
customer requirements, which could reduce demand for our
products.
Our
success is dependent upon our ability to commercialize our shrimp
production technology.
We plan
to commence limited commercial operations in late calendar 2017.
Until then, we will have been engaged principally in the research
and development of the NaturalShrimp technology. Therefore, we have
a limited operating history upon which an evaluation of our
prospects can be made. Our prospects must be considered in light of
the risk, uncertainties, expenses, delays and difficulties
associated with the establishment of a new business in the evolving
food industry, as well as those risks encountered in the shift from
development to commercialization of new technology and products or
services based upon such technology.
We have
developed our first commercial system that employs the
NaturalShrimp technology but additional work is required to
incorporate that technology into a system capable of accommodating
thousands of customers, which is the minimum capability we believe
is necessary to compete in the marketplace.
Our
shrimp production technology may not operate as
intended.
Although we have
successfully tested our NaturalShrimp technology, our approach,
which is still fairly new in the industry, may not operate as
intended or may be subject to other factors that we have not yet
considered. These may include the impact of new pathogens or other
biological risks, low oxygen levels, algal blooms, fluctuating
seawater temperatures, predation or escapes. Any of the foregoing
may result in physical deformities to our shrimp or affect our
ability to increase shrimp production, which may have a material
adverse effect on our operations.
Our
success is dependent upon our ability to protect our intellectual
property.
Our
success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and enforce
protection for our intellectual property in the United States and
other countries. It is possible that our intellectual property
protection could fail. It is possible that the claims for patents
or other intellectual property protections could be denied or
invalidated or that our protections will not be sufficiently broad
to protect our technology. It is also possible that our
intellectual property will not provide protection against
competitive products, or will not otherwise be commercially
viable.
Our
commercial success will depend in part on our ability to
commercialize our shrimp production without infringing on patents
or proprietary rights of others. We cannot guarantee that other
companies or individuals have not or will not independently develop
substantially equivalent proprietary rights or that other parties
have not or will not be issued patents that may prevent the sale of
our products or require licensing and the payment of significant
fees or royalties in order for us to be able to carry on our
business.
15
As
the owner of real estate, we are subject to risks under
environmental laws, the cost of compliance with which and any
violation of which could materially adversely affect
us.
Our
operating expenses could be higher than anticipated due to the cost
of complying with existing and future laws and regulations. Various
environmental laws may impose liability on the current or prior
owner or operator of real property for removal or remediation of
hazardous or toxic substances. Current or prior owners or operators
may also be liable for government fines and damages for injuries to
persons, natural resources and adjacent property. These
environmental laws often impose liability whether or not the owner
or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or
disposal of the hazardous or toxic substances. The cost of
complying with environmental laws could materially adversely affect
our results of operations, and such costs could exceed the value of
our facility. In addition, the presence of hazardous or toxic
substances, or the failure to properly manage, dispose of or
remediate such substances, may adversely affect our ability to use,
sell or rent our property or to borrow using our property as
collateral which, in turn, could reduce our revenue and our
financing ability. We have not engaged independent environmental
consultants to assess the likelihood of any environmental
contamination or liabilities and have not obtained a Phase I
environmental assessment on our property. However, even if we did
obtain a Phase I environmental assessment report, such reports are
limited in scope and may not reveal all existing material
environmental contamination.
Risks Related to Financing Our Business
Our
independent registered public accounting firm has issued its audit
opinion on our consolidated financial statements appearing in our
annual report on Form 10-K, including an explanatory paragraph as
to substantial doubt with the respect to our ability to continue as
a going concern.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, assuming we will continue as a going
concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For
the year ended March 31, 2017, we had net income of $114,318. At
March 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $28,727,774 and a
working capital deficit of $2,384,695. These factors raise
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern,
within one year from the issuance date of this filing. Our ability
to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise
the required additional capital or debt financing to meet short and
long-term operating requirements. We may also encounter business
endeavors that require significant cash commitments or
unanticipated problems or expenses that could result in a
requirement for additional cash. If we raise additional funds
through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the
percentage ownership of our current shareholders could be reduced,
and such securities might have rights, preferences or privileges
senior to our common stock. Additional financing may not be
available upon acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are
not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not
be able to take advantage of prospective business endeavors or
opportunities, which could significantly and materially restrict
our operations. If we are unable to obtain the necessary capital,
we may have to cease operations.
Expansion
of our operations will require significant capital expenditures for
which we may be unable to obtain sufficient financing.
Our
need for additional capital may adversely affect our financial
condition. We have no sustained history of earnings and have
operated at a loss since we commenced business. We have relied, and
continue to rely, on external sources of financing to meet our
capital requirements, to continue developing our proprietary
technology, to build our production facilities, and to otherwise
implement our corporate development and investment
strategies.
We plan
to obtain the future funding that we will need through the debt and
equity markets but there can be no assurance that we will be able
to obtain additional funding when it is required. If we fail to
obtain the funding that we need when it is required, we may have to
forego or delay potentially valuable opportunities to build shrimp
production facilities or default on existing funding commitments to
third parties. Our limited operating history may make it difficult
to obtain future financing.
16
Our
ability to generate positive cash flows is uncertain.
To
develop and expand our business, we will need to make significant
up-front investments in our manufacturing capacity and incur
research and development, sales and marketing and general and
administrative expenses. In addition, our growth will require a
significant investment in working capital. Our business will
require significant amounts of working capital to meet our
production requirements and support our growth.
We
cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise the
capital necessary to meet these requirements. If adequate funds are
not available or are not available on satisfactory terms, we may be
required to significantly curtail our operations and may not be
able to fund our current production requirements - let alone fund
expansion, take advantage of unanticipated acquisition
opportunities, develop or enhance our products, or respond to
competitive pressures. Any failure to obtain such additional
financing could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Because
we may never have net income from our operations, our business may
fail.
We have
no history of revenues and profitability from operations. There can
be no assurance that we will ever operate profitably. Our success
is significantly dependent on uncertain events, including
successful development of our technology, establishing satisfactory
manufacturing arrangements and processes, and distributing and
selling our products.
Before
receiving revenues from sales to customers of our products, we
anticipate that we will incur increased operating expenses without
realizing any revenues. We therefore expect to incur significant
losses. If we are unable to generate significant revenues from
sales of our products, we will not be able to earn profits or
continue operations. We can provide no assurance that we will
generate any revenues or ever achieve profitability. If we are
unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our business will fail and
investors may lose all of their investment in our
Company.
We
need to raise additional funds and such funds may not be available
on acceptable terms or at all.
We may
consider issuing additional debt or equity securities in the future
to fund our business plan, for potential acquisitions or
investments, or for general corporate purposes. If we issue equity
or convertible debt securities to raise additional funds, our
existing stockholders may experience dilution, and the new equity
or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges
senior to those of our existing stockholders. If we incur
additional debt, it may increase our leverage relative to our
earnings or to our equity capitalization, requiring us to pay
additional interest expenses. We may not be able to obtain
financing on favorable terms, or at all, in which case, we may not
be able to develop or enhance our products, execute our business
plan, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to
competitive pressures.
Our
margins fluctuate which leads to further uncertainty in our
profitability model.
While
we will have the potential ability to negotiate prices that benefit
our clients and affect our profitability as it garners market-share
and increases our book of business, margins in the aquaculture
business are fluid, and our margins vary based upon production
volume and the customer. This may lead to continued uncertainty in
margins from quarter to quarter.
Risks Related to Doing Business in Foreign Countries
Our
operations in foreign countries are subject to political, economic,
legal and regulatory risks.
The
following aspects of political, economic, legal and regulatory
systems in foreign countries create uncertainty with respect to
many of the legal and business decisions that we make:
●
cancellation or
renegotiation of contracts due to uncertain enforcement and
recognition procedures of judicial decisions;
17
●
disadvantages of
competing against companies from countries that are not subject to
U.S. laws and regulations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act;
●
changes in foreign
laws or regulations that adversely impact our
business;
●
changes in tax laws
that adversely impact our business, including, but not limited to,
increases in the tax rates and retroactive tax claims;
●
royalty and license
fee increases;
●
expropriation or
nationalization of property;
●
currency
fluctuations;
●
foreign exchange
controls;
●
import and export
regulations;
●
changes in
environmental controls;
●
risks of loss due
to civil strife, acts of war and insurrection; and
●
other risks arising
out of foreign governmental sovereignty over the areas in which our
operations are conducted.
Consequently, our
development and production activities in foreign countries may be
substantially affected by factors beyond our control, any of which
could materially adversely affect our business, prospects,
financial position and results of operations. Furthermore, in the
event of a dispute arising from our operations in other countries,
we may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of courts outside
the United States or may not be successful in subjecting non-U.S.
persons or entities to the jurisdiction of the courts in the United
States, which could adversely affect the outcome of a
dispute.
The
cost of complying with governmental regulations in foreign
countries may adversely affect our business
operations.
We may
be subject to various governmental regulations in foreign
countries. These regulations may change depending on prevailing
political or economic conditions. In order to comply with these
regulations, we believe that we may be required to obtain permits
for producing shrimp and file reports concerning our operations.
These regulations affect how we carry on our business, and in order
to comply with them, we may incur increased costs and delay certain
activities pending receipt of requisite permits and approvals. If
we fail to comply with applicable regulations and requirements, we
may become subject to enforcement actions, including orders issued
by regulatory or judicial authorities requiring us to cease or
curtail our operations, or take corrective measures involving
capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or
remedial actions. We may be required to compensate third parties
for loss or damage suffered by reason of our activities, and may
face civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of
applicable laws or regulations. Amendments to current laws,
regulations and permits governing our operations and activities
could affect us in a materially adverse way and could force us to
increase expenditures or abandon or delay the development of shrimp
production facilities.
Our
international operations will involve the use of foreign
currencies, which will subject us to exchange rate fluctuations and
other currency risks.
Currently, we have
no revenues from international operations. In the future, however,
any revenues and related expenses of our international operations
will likely be generally denominated in local currencies, which
will subject us to exchange rate fluctuations between such local
currencies and the U.S. dollar. These exchange rate fluctuations
will subject us to currency translation risk with respect to the
reported results of our international operations, as well as to
other risks sometimes associated with international operations. In
the future, we could experience fluctuations in financial results
from our operations outside of the United States, and there can be
no assurance we will be able, contractually or otherwise, to reduce
the currency risks associated with our international
operations.
Our
insurance coverage may be inadequate to cover all significant risk
exposures.
We will
be exposed to liabilities that are unique to the products we
provide. While we intend to maintain insurance for certain risks,
the amount of our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover
all claims or liabilities, and we may be forced to bear substantial
costs resulting from risks and uncertainties of our business. It is
also not possible to obtain insurance to protect against all
operational risks and liabilities. The failure to obtain adequate
insurance coverage on terms favorable to us, or at all, could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. We do not have any business interruption
insurance. Any business disruption or natural disaster could result
in substantial costs and diversion of resources.
18
Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Stock
We
have limited capitalization and may require financing, which may
not be available.
We have
limited capitalization, which increases our vulnerability to
general adverse economic and industry conditions, limits our
flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business
and industry and may place us at a competitive disadvantage to
competitors with sufficient or excess capitalization. If we are
unable to obtain sufficient financing on satisfactory terms and
conditions, we will be forced to curtail or abandon our plans or
operations. Our ability to obtain financing will depend upon a
number of factors, many of which are beyond our
control.
A
limited public trading market exists for our common stock, which
makes it more difficult for our stockholders to sell their common
stock in the public markets. Any trading in our shares may have a
significant effect on our stock prices.
Although our common
stock is listed for quotation on the OTC Marketplace, QB Tier,
under the symbol “SHMP”, the trading volume of our
stock is limited and a market may not develop or be sustained. As a
result, any trading price of our common stock may not be an
accurate indicator of the valuation of our common stock. Any
trading in our shares could have a significant effect on our stock
price. If a more liquid public market for our common stock does not
develop, then investors may not be able to resell the shares of our
common stock that they have purchased and may lose all of their
investment. No assurance can be given that an active market will
develop or that a stockholder will ever be able to liquidate its
shares of common stock without considerable delay, if at all. Many
brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in the
securities. Even if an investor finds a broker willing to effect a
transaction in our securities, the combination of brokerage
commissions, state transfer taxes, if any, and any other selling
costs may exceed the selling price. Furthermore, our stock price
may be impacted by factors that are unrelated or disproportionate
to our operating performance. These market fluctuations, as well as
general economic, political and market conditions, such as
recessions, interest rates or international currency fluctuations
may adversely affect the market price and liquidity of our common
stock.
Our
stock price may be volatile.
The
market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile
and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors,
many of which are beyond our control, including the
following:
●
our stock being
held by a small number of persons whose sales (or lack of sales)
could result in positive or negative pricing pressure on the market
price for our common stock;
●
actual or
anticipated variations in our quarterly operating
results;
●
changes in our
earnings estimates;
●
our ability to
obtain adequate working capital financing;
●
changes in market
valuations of similar companies;
●
publication (or
lack of publication) of research reports about us;
●
changes in
applicable laws or regulations, court rulings, enforcement and
legal actions;
●
loss of any
strategic relationships;
●
additions or
departures of key management personnel;
●
actions by our
stockholders (including transactions in our shares);
●
speculation in the
press or investment community;
●
increases in market
interest rates, which may increase our cost of
capital;
●
changes in our
industry;
●
competitive pricing
pressures;
●
our ability to
execute our business plan; and
●
economic and other
external factors.
In
addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the
operating performance of particular companies. These market
fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market
price of our common stock.
19
Our
stock is categorized as a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be
restricted by the SEC’s penny stock regulations which may
limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our
stock.
Our
stock is categorized as a “penny stock”, as that term
is defined in SEC Rule 3a51-1, which generally provides that
“penny stock”, is any equity security that has a market
price (as defined) less than US$5.00 per share, subject to certain
exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules,
including Rule 15g-9, which impose additional sales practice
requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than
established customers and accredited investors. The penny stock
rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny
stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a
standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC
which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and
level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also
must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for
the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its
salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements
showing the market value of each penny stock held in the
customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the
broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be
given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the
transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or
with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny
stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock
not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make
a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable
investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s
written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements
may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in
the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny
stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the
ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities and reduces the
number of potential investors. We believe that the penny stock
rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability
of our common stock.
According to SEC
Release No. 34-29093, the market for “penny stocks” has
suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such
patterns include: (1) control of the market for the security by one
or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or
issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of
purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (3)
boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and
unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (4)
excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by
selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale dumping of the same
securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been
manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable
collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. The
occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the future
volatility of our share price.
FINRA
sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s
ability to buy and sell our stock.
In
addition to the “penny stock” rules described above,
FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an
investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable
grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that
customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities
to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make
reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s
financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other
information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes
that there is a high probability that speculative low priced
securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The
FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to
recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may
limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse
effect on the market for our shares.
To
date, we have not paid any cash dividends and no cash dividends
will be paid in the foreseeable future.
We do
not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future and we may not have sufficient funds legally
available to pay dividends. Even if the funds are legally available
for distribution, we may nevertheless decide not to pay any
dividends. We presently intend to retain all earnings for our
operations.
20
The
existence of indemnification rights to our directors, officers and
employees may result in substantial expenditures by our Company and
may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers and
employees.
Our
bylaws contain indemnification provisions for our directors,
officers and employees, and we have entered into indemnification
agreements with our officer and directors. The foregoing
indemnification obligations could result in us incurring
substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage
awards against directors and officers, which we may be unable to
recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also discourage us
from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches
of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage the filing
of derivative litigation by our stockholders against our directors
and officers even though such actions, if successful, might
otherwise benefit us and our stockholders.
If
we fail to develop or maintain an effective system of internal
controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial
results or prevent financial fraud. As a result, current and
potential stockholders could lose confidence in our financial
reporting.
We are
subject to the risk that sometime in the future, our independent
registered public accounting firm could communicate to the board of
directors that we have deficiencies in our internal control
structure that they consider to be “significant
deficiencies.” A “significant deficiency” is
defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in
internal controls over financial reporting such that there is more
than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the
entity’s financial statements will not be prevented or
detected by the entity’s internal controls.
Effective internal
controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports
and effectively prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable
financial reports or prevent fraud, we could be subject to
regulatory action or other litigation and our operating results
could be harmed. We are required to document and test our internal
control procedures to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley
Act” or “SOX”), which requires our management to
annually assess the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting.
We
currently are not an “accelerated filer” as defined in
Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section
404”) requires us to include an internal control report with
our Annual Report on Form 10-K. That report must include
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year.
This report must also include disclosure of any material weaknesses
in internal control over financial reporting that we have
identified. As of March 31, 2017, the management of the Company
assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective
internal control over financial reporting established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(“COSO”) and SEC guidance on conducting such
assessments. Management concluded, during the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2017, that the Company’s internal controls and
procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate
application of U.S. GAAP rules. Management realized there were
deficiencies in the design or operation of the Company’s
internal control that adversely affected the Company’s
internal controls which management considers to be material
weaknesses. A material weakness in the effectiveness of our
internal controls over financial reporting could result in an
increased chance of fraud and the loss of customers, reduce our
ability to obtain financing and require additional expenditures to
comply with these requirements, each of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition. For additional information, see Item 9A – Controls
and Procedures.
Our
intended business, operations and accounting are expected to be
substantially more complex than they have been in the past. It may
be time consuming, difficult and costly for us to develop and
implement the internal controls and reporting procedures required
by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may need to hire additional financial
reporting, internal controls and other finance personnel in order
to develop and implement appropriate internal controls and
reporting procedures. If we are unable to comply with the internal
controls requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, then we may not be
able to obtain the independent accountant certifications required
by such act, which may preclude us from keeping our filings with
the SEC current.
21
If we
are unable to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as
those standards are modified, supplemented, or amended from time to
time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an
ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over
financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. Failure to
achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment
could cause us to face regulatory action and cause investors to
lose confidence in our reported financial information, either of
which could adversely affect the value of our common
stock.
As
a public company, we will incur significant increased operating
costs and our management will be required to devote substantial
time to new compliance initiatives.
Although our
management has significant experience in the food industry, it has
only limited experience operating the Company as a public company.
To operate effectively, we will be required to continue to
implement changes in certain aspects of our business and develop,
manage and train management level and other employees to comply
with on-going public company requirements. Failure to take such
actions, or delay in the implementation thereof, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules subsequently implemented by
the SEC, imposes various requirements on public companies,
including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective
disclosure and financial controls and changes in corporate
governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need
to devote a substantial amount of time to these new compliance
initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase
our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some
activities more time-consuming and costly.
Our
independent registered public accounting firm has issued its audit
opinion on our consolidated financial statements appearing in our
annual report on Form 10-K, including an explanatory paragraph as
to substantial doubt with the respect to our ability to continue as
a going concern.
The
report of Turner, Stone & Company, our independent registered
public accounting firm, with respect to our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2017, indicates that there was substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from this
uncertainty. For additional information, see Item 7 –
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations – “Going
Concern.”
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not
Applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our
principal offices are located at 15150 Preston Road, Suite 300,
Dallas, TX, where we pay $550 per month under an operating lease
that expires on August 2017. The Company expects to renew this
lease for the forseeable future.
We also
own a pilot-production facility at 833 County Road 583, Medina, TX,
which consists of a 32,760 square foot production facility on 37
acres.
We own
no other properties.
Our
registered agent is Business Filings Incorporated, located at 701
S. Carson Street, Suite 200, Carson City, Nevada
89701.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We know
of no material proceedings in which any of our directors, officers
or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder is a
party adverse to our company or our subsidiaries or has a material
interest adverse to our company or our subsidiaries.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not
applicable.
22
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
Market Information
Our
common stock is quoted on the OTC Markets, QB Tier, under the
symbol “SHMP”. The closing price of our common stock on
June 26, 2017 was $0.39 per share. Set forth below are the range of
high and low bid quotations for the period indicated as reported by
the OTC Markets Group (www.otcmarkets.com).
The market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail
mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may not necessarily represent
actual transactions.
Quarter
Ended
|
Bid
High
|
Bid
Low
|
March 31,
2017
|
$0.60
|
$0.31
|
December 31,
2016
|
$0.62
|
$0.22
|
September 30,
2016
|
$0.83
|
$0.28
|
June 30,
2016
|
$0.52
|
$0.05
|
March 31,
2016
|
$1.25
|
$0.32
|
December 31,
2015
|
$2.00
|
$0.30
|
September 30,
2015
|
$2.00
|
$1.31
|
June 30,
2015
|
$3.25
|
$1.00
|
Transfer Agent
Our
transfer agent is Island Stock Transfer, Inc., and is located at
15500 Roosevelt Boulevard, Suite 301, Clearwater, Florida 33760.
Their telephone number is (727) 289-0010.
Holders of Common Stock
As of
June 26, 2017, there were 80 shareholders of record of our common
stock. As of such date, 92,408,298 shares were issued and
outstanding.
Dividends
We have
never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We
currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to increase our
working capital and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in
the foreseeable future.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
There
were no equity compensation plans formally approved by the
shareholders of the Company as of March 31, 2017.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Between
February 13, 2015 and October 10, 2016, we entered into
subscription agreements with various accredited investors and
multiple closings of a private placement offering of the
Company’s common stock (the “Offering”). An
aggregate of 4,143,326 shares of common stock had been sold to
investors at a price of $0.35 per share, for aggregate gross
proceeds of $ 1,370,350.
23
The
above sales of securities were conducted by the Company on a
“best efforts” basis wherein up to 7,142,858 shares of
common stock at a price of $0.35 per share were available to be
sold, for an aggregate offering of up to $2,500,000. The shares
were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration afforded
by Section 4(a)(2) and Regulation D (Rule 506) under the Securities
Act and corresponding provisions of state securities laws for
offerings to "accredited investors" as such term is defined in the
Securities Act, based upon representations made by such investors.
The Company intends to use the proceeds of the offering for general
corporate purposes, including working capital needs.
During
the year ended March 31, 2016, we reached an agreement with certain
vendors in which we issued 199,103 shares of our common stock in
full payment of debt of $35,000, accrued interest of $23,927 and
recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $319,369.
On
August 7, 2015, we reached an agreement with a professional advisor
in which the Company issued 28,571 shares of common stock with a
fair value of $49,999.
On
August 1, 2016, the Company reached an agreement with a
professional advisor in which the Company issued 55,000 shares of
common stock with a fair value of $24,750.
On
January 10, 2017, we issued 1,000,000 shares to a consultant for
services to be rendered over six months. The fair value of the
shares was $440,000, based on the market value of our common stock
on the date of issuance.
On
January 23, 2017, we issued 1,225,715 shares to two unrelated
parties in exchange for the settlement of debt owed by
NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc., a related party, previous to our
January 2015 reverse acquisition. At the time of the acquisition we
were not made aware of the debt and therefore did not assume the
liability in the purchase agreement. When the Company was presented
with the debt during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2017, the
Company agreed to assume and settle this debt by the issuance of
common shares. The fair value of the shares issued, based on the
market value of the common shares on the date of the settlement
agreement, was $563,829.
The
foregoing issuances were exempt from the registration requirements
of the Securities Act pursuant to the exemption for transactions by
an issuer not involved in any public offering under
Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 of
Regulation D.
On
January 23, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement and issued a Convertible Note in the original principal
amount of $262,500 to an accredited investor, along with a Warrant
to purchase 350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, in
exchange for a purchase price of $250,000. The Company received
$50,000 upon closing, with additional consideration to be paid to
the Company in such amounts and at such dates as the holder may
choose in its sole discretion. The warrants are exercisable over a
period of five (5) years at an exercise price of $0.60, subject to
adjustment. The note is convertible into shares of the
Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per
share, subject to adjustment. The maturity date of the note shall
be two years form the date of each payment of consideration
thereunder. A one-time interest charge of twelve percent (12%)
shall be applied on the issuance date and payable on the maturity
date. The note contains a provision regarding piggyback
registration rights, which states the Company shall include all
shares issuable upon conversion of the note in the next
registration statement the Company files with the SEC. This
issuance was exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act pursuant to the exemption for transactions by an
issuer not involved in any public offering under Section 4(a)(2) of
the Securities Act and Rule 506 of Regulation D. The Company
intends to use the proceeds of the sale for general working capital
purposes. The foregoing descriptions of the January 23, 2017
Securities Purchase Agreement, Convertible Note and Warrant do not
purport to be complete, and are qualified in their entirety by
reference to the full text of such documents attached hereto as
exhibits and incorporated herein by reference.
24
On
March 16, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement with an accredited investor related to the purchase and
sale of certain convertible debentures in the aggregate principal
amount of up to $400,000 for an aggregate purchase price of up to
$360,000. The agreement contemplates three separate convertible
debentures, with each maturing three years following the date of
issuance. On March 28, 2017, the Company issued the first
Convertible Debenture in the principal amount of $100,000 for a
purchase price of $90,000. The closing of the second Convertible
Debenture is to occur upon mutual agreement of the parties, at any
time within sixty (60) to ninety (90) days following the original
signing closing date, in the principal amount of $150,000 for a
purchase price of $135,000. The closing of the third Convertible
Debenture will occur upon mutual agreement of the parties within
sixty (60) to ninety (90) days following the second closing, in the
principal amount of $150,000 for a purchase price of $135,000.
Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued
100,000 shares of restricted stock as a commitment fee in
consideration of the expenses and analysis performed in connection
with the contemplated investment. The fair value of the shares
issued as a commitment fee was $34,000, based on the market value
of our common stock on the date of issuance. The Convertible
Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.30 for the first one
hundred eighty (180) days. After one hundred eighty (180) days, or
in an event of default, the conversion price will be the lower of
$0.30 or sixty percent (60%) of the lowest closing bid price over
the 20 trading days preceding the date of conversion. The
Securities Purchase Agreement contains a provision regarding
piggyback registration rights in the event the Company contemplates
making a registered offering under the Securities Act or proposes
to file a registration statement covering any of its securities
within the eighteen (18) months following the signing closing date.
This issuance was exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act pursuant to the exemption for transactions by an
issuer not involved in any public offering under Section 4(a)(2) of
the Securities Act and Rule 506 of Regulation D. The Company
intends to use the proceeds of the sale for general working capital
purposes. The foregoing descriptions of the March 2017 Securities
Purchase Agreement and Convertible Debenture do not purport to be
complete, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the
full text of such documents attached hereto as exhibits and
incorporated herein by reference.
Between
January 1, 2017 and March 31, 2017, the Company entered into two
Private Placement Subscription Agreements and issued two Six
Percent (6%) Unsecured Convertible Notes to Dragon Acquisitions
LLC, an affiliate of the Company (“Dragon
Acquisitions”). William Delgado, the Treasurer, Chief
Financial Officer, and a director of the Company, is the managing
member of Dragon Acquisitions. The first note was issued on January
20, 2017, in the principal amount of $20,000, and the second note
was issued on March 14, 2017, in the principal amount of $20,000.
The notes accrue interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per
annum, and mature one (1) year from the date of issuance. Upon an
event of default, the default interest rate will be increased to
twenty-four percent (24%), and the total amount of principal and
accrued interest shall become immediately due and payable at the
holder’s discretion. The notes are convertible into shares of
the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share, subject to adjustment.
Subsequent to the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued an additional
Six Percent (6%) Unsecured Convertible Note to Dragon Acquisitions.
The note was issued on April 20, 2017 in the principal amount of
$140,000. The note accrues interest at the rate of six percent (6%)
per annum, and matures one (1) year from the date of issuance. Upon
an event of default, the default interest rate will be increased to
twenty-four percent (24%), and the total amount of principal and
accrued interest shall become immediately due and payable at the
holder’s discretion. The note is convertible into shares of
the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share, subject to adjustment.
The
foregoing issuances to Dragon Acquisitions were exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to the
exemption for transactions by an issuer not involved in any public
offering under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule
506 of Regulation D. The foregoing description of these issuances
does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the full text of the Form of Private Placement
Subscription Agreement and Six Percent (6%) Unsecured Convertible
Note attached hereto as Exhibit 10.16 and incorporated herein by
reference.
On May
2, 2017, the Company sold 100,000 shares of its common stock to an
accredited investor at $0.25 per share, for a total financing of
$25,000. This issuance was exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to the exemption for
transactions by an issuer not involved in a public offering under
Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 of Regulation
D.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, we did not repurchase any of
our equity securities.
25
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not
applicable.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements
The
information contained in Item 7 contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. Actual results may materially differ from those projected
in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and
uncertainties set forth in this report. Although management
believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in
the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no
assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to
be correct or that actual results will not be different from
expectations expressed in this report.
We
desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor”
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
This filing contains a number of forward-looking statements that
reflect management’s current views and expectations with
respect to our business, strategies, products, future results and
events, and financial performance. All statements made in this
filing other than statements of historical fact, including
statements addressing operating performance, clinical developments
which management expects or anticipates will or may occur in the
future, including statements related to our technology, market
expectations, future revenues, financing alternatives, statements
expressing general optimism about future operating results, and
non-historical information, are forward looking statements. In
particular, the words “believe,” “expect,”
“intend,” “anticipate,”
“estimate,” “may,” variations of such
words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements,
but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements, and
their absence does not mean that the statement is not
forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below.
Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ
materially from historical results as well as those expressed in,
anticipated, or implied by these forward-looking statements. We do
not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking
statements to reflect any future events or
circumstances.
Readers
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which are based on management’s current
expectations and projections about future events, are not
guarantees of future performance, are subject to risks,
uncertainties and assumptions (including those described below),
and apply only as of the date of this filing. Our actual results,
performance or achievements could differ materially from the
results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking
statements. Factors which could cause or contribute to such
differences include, but are not limited to, the risks to be
discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the press
releases and other communications to shareholders issued by us from
time to time which attempt to advise interested parties of the
risks and factors which may affect our business. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events,
or otherwise. For additional information regarding forward-looking
statements, see Item 1 – Our Business –
“Forward-Looking Statements.”
Use of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(“GAAP”) Financial Measures
We use
United States GAAP financial measures in the section of this report
captioned “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan
of Operation” (MD&A), unless otherwise noted. All of the
GAAP financial measures used by us in this report relate to the
inclusion of financial information. This discussion and analysis
should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the
notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report. All
references to dollar amounts in this section are in United States
dollars, unless expressly stated otherwise. Please see Item 1A
“Risk Factors” for a list of our risk
factors.
Overview
We were
incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 3, 2008 under the name
“Multiplayer Online Dragon, Inc.” Effective November 5,
2010, we effected an 8 for 1 forward stock split, increasing the
issued and outstanding shares of our common stock from 12,000,000
shares to 96,000,000 shares. Effective October 29, 2014, we
effected a 1 for 10 reverse stock split, decreasing the issued and
outstanding shares of our common stock from 97,000,000 to
9,700,000.
26
On
November 26, 2014, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the
“Agreement”) with NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc. a
Delaware corporation (“NSH”), pursuant to which we
agreed to acquire substantially all of the assets of NSH which
assets consisted primarily of all of the issued and outstanding
shares of capital stock of NaturalShrimp Corporation
(“NSC”), a Delaware corporation, and NaturalShrimp
Global, Inc. (“NS Global”), a Delaware corporation, and
certain real property located outside of San Antonio, Texas (the
“Assets”).
On
January 30, 2015, we consummated the acquisition of the Assets
pursuant to the Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the
Agreement, we issued 75,520,240 shares of our common stock to NSH
as consideration for the Assets. As a result of the transaction,
NSH acquired 88.62% of our issued and outstanding shares of common
stock, NSC and NS Global became our wholly-owned subsidiaries, and
we changed our principal business to a global shrimp farming and
biotechnology company.
In
connection with our receipt of approval from the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), effective March 3,
2015, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to change our name
to “NaturalShrimp Incorporated.”
We are
a biotechnology company and have developed a proprietary technology
that allows us to grow Pacific White shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei,
formerly Penaeus vannamei) in an ecologically controlled,
high-density, low-cost environment, and in fully contained and
independent production facilities. Our system uses technology which
allows us to produce a naturally-grown shrimp “crop”
weekly, and accomplishes this without the use of antibiotics or
toxic chemicals. We have developed several proprietary technology
assets, including a knowledge base that allows us to produce
commercial quantities of shrimp in a closed system with a computer
monitoring system that automates, monitors and maintains proper
levels of oxygen, salinity and temperature for optimal shrimp
production. Our initial production facility is located outside of
San Antonio, Texas.
NS
Global, a wholly owned subsidiary of NaturalShrimp Incorporated.,
owns approximately 10% of NaturalShrimp International A.S. in
Europe. Our European-based partner, NaturalShrimp International
A.S., Oslo, Norway is responsible for the construction cost of
their facility and initial operating capital.
The
first facility built in Spain for NaturalShrimp International A.S.
is GambaNatural de España, S.L. The land for the first
facility was purchased in Medina del Campo, Spain and construction
of the 75,000 sq. ft. facility was completed in 2016. Medina del
Campo is approximately seventy-five miles northwest of Madrid,
Spain.
Since
the middle of 2015, we have continued to develop our indoor shrimp
production system. In addition, during 2016, we engaged in
additional engineering projects with third parties to further
enhance our indoor production capabilities. We are also working on
expanding our intellectual property with respect to such additional
enhancements. At this time, we don’t expect commercial
production until late calendar 2017, which would be limited. When
production does commence, wholesale prices for the shrimp produced
by the Company are expected to be between $9.00 to $12.00 per pound
F.O.B, based on preliminary estimates.
On
October 16, 2015, we formed Natural Aquatic Systems, Inc.
(“NAS”). The purpose of the NAS is to formalize the
business relationship between NaturalShrimp Incorporated and
F&T Water Solutions LLC for the joint development of certain
water technologies. The technologies shall include, but are not
limited to, any and all inventions, patents, intellectual property
and know-how dealing with enclosed aquatic production systems
worldwide. This includes construction, operation, and management of
enclosed aquatic production, other than shrimp, facilities
throughout the world, co-developed by both parties at our facility
located outside of La Coste, Texas.
27
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 and the Fiscal
Year Ended March 31, 2016
Revenue
We have
not earned any significant revenues since our inception and we do
not anticipate earning revenues in the near future.
Expenses
Our
operating expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 are
summarized as follows, in comparison to our operating expenses for
fiscal year ended March 31, 2016:
|
Fiscal Year
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Salaries and
related expenses
|
$348,655
|
$471,948
|
Rent
|
12,997
|
12,622
|
Professional
fees
|
139,284
|
566,096
|
Other general and
administrative expenses
|
408,246
|
362,999
|
Facility
operations
|
70,930
|
183,662
|
Depreciation
|
60,459
|
74,680
|
Total
|
$1,040,571
|
$1,672,007
|
Operating expenses
decreased $631,436 from $1,672,007 for the year ended March 31,
2016 to $1,040,571 for the year ended March 31, 2017, a decrease of
38%. The primary reason for the change is the approximate $427,000
decrease in professional fees associated with the reverse
acquisition transaction that incurred in the previous year. There
were additional decreases in salaries and related expenses of
approximately $115,000 due to a reduction in certain personnel and
operating expenses, and a decrease in facility operations expenses
of approximately $113,000, mainly due to a reduction in operating
expenses. This was
partially offset by an approximate $34,000 increase in general and
administration costs.
Liquidity, Financial Condition and Capital Resources
As of
March 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents on hand of $88,195
and a working capital deficiency of $2,384,695, as compared to cash
equivalents on hand of $6,158 and a working capital deficiency of
$4,836,356 as of March 31, 2016. The decrease in working capital
deficiency is mainly due to the extinguishment of certain notes
payable in default to a related party of approximately $2,300,000
in principal and the related accrued interest, as well as an
increase in cash and cash equivalents and prepaid expenses for the
year ended March 31, 2017.
Private Placement Offering
Between
February 13, 2015 and October 10, 2016, we entered into
subscription agreements with various accredited investors and
multiple closings of a private placement offering of the
Company’s common stock (the “Offering”). An
aggregate of 4,143,326 shares of common stock had been sold to
investors at a price of $0.35 per share, for aggregate gross
proceeds of $ 1,370,350.
Short-Term Debt and Lines of Credit
On
November 3, 2015, the Company entered into a short-term note
agreement with Community National Bank for a total of $50,000. The
short-term note has a stated interest rate of 5.25%, maturity date
of December 15, 2017 and had an initial interest only payment on
February 3, 2016. The short-term note is guaranteed by an officer
and director of the Company. The balance of the line of credit at
March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 was $25,298 and $50,000,
respectively.
28
We have
a working capital line of credit with Community National Bank for
$30,000. The line of credit bears interest at the rate of 7.3% and
is payable quarterly. The line of credit initially matured on
February 28, 2014 and was renewed by the Company with an extended
maturity date of June 10, 2017. The Company intends to extend the
maturity date of this line of credit with the bank. It is secured
by various assets of the Company’s subsidiaries, and is also
guaranteed by two directors of the Company. The balance of the line
of credit at March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 was zero and
$14,129, respectively.
We also
have a working capital line of credit with Extraco Bank. On April
30, 2017, the Company renewed the line of credit for $475,000. The
line of credit bears interest at the rate of 5.0% that is
compounded monthly on unpaid balances and is payable monthly. The
line of credit matures on April 30, 2018, and is secured by
certificates of deposit and letters of credit owned by directors
and shareholders of the Company. The balance of the line of credit
was $473,029 at both March 31, 2017 (included in non-current
liabilities) and March 31, 2016.
We also
have additional lines of credit with Extraco Bank for $100,000 and
$200,000, which were renewed on January 19, 2017 and April 30,
2017, respectively, with maturity dates of January 19, 2018 and
April 30, 2018, (included in non-current liabilities),
respectively. The lines of credit initially accrued interest at the
rate of 4.5% (increased to 6.5% and 5%, respectively, upon renewal
in 2017), which is compounded monthly on unpaid balances and is
payable monthly. These lines of credit are secured by certificates
of deposit and letters of credit owned by directors and
shareholders of the Company. The balance of these lines of credit
was $278,470 at both March 31, 2017 and March 31,
2016.
We also
have a working capital line of credit with Capital One Bank for
$50,000. The line of credit bears an interest rate of prime plus
25.9 basis points, which totaled 29.9% as of March 31, 2017. The
line of credit is unsecured. The balance of the line of credit was
$9,580 at both March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.
We also
have a working capital line of credit with Chase Bank for $25,000.
The line of credit bears an interest rate of prime plus 10 basis
points, which totaled 14% as of March 31, 2017. The line of credit
is secured by assets of the Company’s subsidiaries. The
balance of the line of credit was $11,197 and $12,261 at March 31,
2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
Bank Loan
In
2009, Amarillo National Bank sold and transferred a note to Baptist
Community Services (“BCS”), a shareholder of the
Company, in the amount of $2,004,820. The note had a 2.25% interest
rate, payable monthly, and was collateralized by all inventories,
accounts, equipment and general intangibles related to the
Company’s shrimp production facility in La Coste, Texas. The
Company also entered into a subordinated promissory note agreement
with BCS effective December 31, 2008, in the initial principal
amount of $70,000 (and later increased to $125,000), for working
capital purposes. On January 25, 2010, the Company received notice
from BCS that the Company was in default of its obligations to BCS,
declaring all principal and interest payments under the note and
subordinated note due and payable in full. BCS agreed to forbear
from exercising any rights and remedies under the notes until
December 31, 2016, pursuant to the terms set forth in various
forbearance agreements. The BCS debt was paid off in January 2017,
as described in further detail below.
On
January 10, 2017, we entered into a promissory note agreement with
Community National Bank in the principal amount of $245,000, with
an annual interest rate of 5% and a maturity date of January 10,
2020 (the “CNB Note”). The CNB Note is secured by
certain real property owned by the Company in La Coste, Texas, and
is also personally guaranteed by the Company’s President and
Chairman of the Board, as well as certain non-affiliated
shareholders of the Company. As consideration for the guarantee,
the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock to the
guaranteeing shareholders, not including the Company’s
President and Chairman of the Board, which was recognized as debt
issuance costs. We used $200,000 of the proceeds from the CNB Note
to settle the outstanding amounts due on the notes payable in
default to BCS in the principal amount of $2,305,953, plus accrued
interest of $233,398, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt
of $2,339,353.
29
Shareholder Notes
Since
inception, the Company has entered into several working capital
notes payable to Bill Williams, an executive officer, director, and
shareholder of the Company, for a total of $486,500. These notes
are demand notes, had stock issued in lieu of interest and have no
set monthly payment or maturity date. The balance of these notes at
both March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 was $426,404, and is
classified as a current liability on our consolidated balance
sheets. We repaid $0 during the year ended March 31, 2017. At March
31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, accrued interest payable was $172,808
and $142,296, respectively.
In
2009, the Company made and entered into an unsecured note payable
to Randall Steele, a shareholder of NSH, in the principal amount of
$50,000. The note accrues interest at six percent (6%) and matured
on January 20, 2011. As of March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, the
balance of the note was $50,000, and is classified as a current
liability on our consolidated balance sheets. As of March 31, 2017
and March 31, 2016, accrued interest payable was $2,283 and $1,543,
respectively.
Beginning in 2010,
the Company began entering into several working capital notes
payable to various shareholders of NSH for a total principal amount
of $290,000. These notes accrue interest at eight percent (8%). As
of March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, the aggregate principal
balance of these notes was $5,000, and accrued interest payable was
$1,200 and $800, respectively.
On
January 1, 2016, the Company entered into a note payable agreement
with NSH, our majority shareholder. Between January 16, 2016 and
March 7, 2017, the Company borrowed $134,750 under this agreement.
The note payable has no set monthly payment or maturity date, and
has a stated interest rate of two percent (2%).
Between
January 1, 2017 and March 31, 2017, the Company entered into two
Private Placement Subscription Agreements and issued two Six
Percent (6%) Unsecured Convertible Notes to Dragon Acquisitions.
William Delgado, the Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, and a
director of the Company, is the managing member of Dragon
Acquisitions. The first note was issued on January 20, 2017, in the
principal amount of $20,000, and the second note was issued on
March 14, 2017, in the principal amount of $20,000. The notes
accrue interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum, and
mature one (1) year from the date of issuance. Upon an event of
default, the default interest rate will be increased to twenty-four
percent (24%), and the total amount of principal and accrued
interest shall become immediately due and payable at the
holder’s discretion. The notes are convertible into shares of
the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share, subject to adjustment.
Subsequent to the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued an additional
Six Percent (6%) Unsecured Convertible Note to Dragon Acquisitions.
The note was issued on April 20, 2017 in the principal amount of
$140,000. The note accrues interest at the rate of six percent (6%)
per annum, and matures one (1) year from the date of issuance. Upon
an event of default, the default interest rate will be increased to
twenty-four percent (24%), and the total amount of principal and
accrued interest shall become immediately due and payable at the
holder’s discretion. The note is convertible into shares of
the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share, subject to adjustment.
Convertible Debentures
On
January 23, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement and issued a Convertible Note in the original principal
amount of $262,500 to an accredited investor, along with a Warrant
to purchase 350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, in
exchange for a purchase price of $250,000. The Company received
$50,000 upon closing, with additional consideration to be paid to
the Company in such amounts and at such dates as the holder may
choose in its sole discretion. The warrants are exercisable over a
period of five (5) years at an exercise price of $0.60, subject to
adjustment. The note is convertible into shares of the
Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per
share, subject to adjustment. The maturity date of the note shall
be two years form the date of each payment of consideration
thereunder. A one-time interest charge of twelve percent (12%)
shall be applied on the issuance date and payable on the maturity
date. The Company intends to use the proceeds of the sale for
general working capital purposes.
30
On
March 16, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement with an accredited investor related to the purchase and
sale of certain convertible debentures in the aggregate principal
amount of up to $400,000 for an aggregate purchase price of up to
$360,000. The agreement contemplates three separate convertible
debentures, with each maturing three years following the date of
issuance. On March 28, 2017, the Company issued the first
Convertible Debenture in the principal amount of $100,000 for a
purchase price of $90,000. The closing of the second Convertible
Debenture is to occur upon mutual agreement of the parties, at any
time within sixty (60) to ninety (90) days following the original
signing closing date, in the principal amount of $150,000 for a
purchase price of $135,000. The closing of the third Convertible
Debenture will occur upon mutual agreement of the parties within
sixty (60) to ninety (90) days following the second closing, in the
principal amount of $150,000 for a purchase price of $135,000. The
Convertible Debentures are convertible into shares of the
Company’s common stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.30
for the first one hundred eighty (180) days. After one hundred
eighty (180) days, or in an event of default, the conversion price
will be the lower of $0.30 or sixty percent (60%) of the lowest
closing bid price over the 20 trading days preceding the date of
conversion. The Company intends to use the proceeds of the sale for
general working capital purposes.
Share Issuances to Settle Debt
During
the year ended March 31, 2016, we reached an agreement with certain
noteholders in which we issued 199,103 shares of our common stock
in full payment of debt of $35,000, accrued interest of $23,927 and
recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $319,369. This
issuance was made to pay off the balance due under certain notes
payable with various shareholders of the Company, which were made
and issued by the Company beginning in 2009.
On
August 7, 2015, we reached an agreement with a professional advisor
in which the Company issued 28,571 shares of common stock with a
fair value of $49,999 as compensation for services
provided.
On
August 1, 2016, the Company reached an agreement with a
professional advisor in which the Company issued 55,000 shares of
common stock with a fair value of $24,750 as compensation for
services provided.
On
January 10, 2017, we issued 1,000,000 shares to a consultant for
services to be rendered over six months. The fair value of the
shares was $440,000, based on the market value of our common stock
on the date of issuance.
On
January 23, 2017, we issued 1,225,715 shares to two unrelated
parties in exchange for the settlement of debt owed by
NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc., a related party, previous to the
Company’s January 2015 reverse acquisition. At the time of
the acquisition the Company was not made aware of the debt and
therefore did not assume the liability in the purchase agreement.
When the Company was presented with the debt during the fiscal year
ending March 31, 2017, the Company agreed to assume and settle this
debt by the issuance of common shares. The fair value of the shares
issued, based on the market value of the common shares on the date
of the settlement agreement, was $563,829.
Going Concern
The
audited consolidated financial statements contained in this annual
report on Form 10-K have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. The Company has accumulated
losses through the period to March 31, 2017 of $28,727,774 as well
as negative cash flows from operating activities. Presently, the
Company does not have sufficient cash resources to meet its plans
in the twelve months following March 31, 2017. These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern. Management is in the process of evaluating various
financing alternatives in order to finance our research and
development activities and general and administrative expenses.
These alternatives include raising funds through public or private
equity markets and either through institutional or retail
investors. Although there is no assurance that the Company will be
successful with our fund raising initiatives, management believes
that the Company will be able to secure the necessary financing as
a result of ongoing financing discussions with third party
investors and existing shareholders.
31
The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a
going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern
is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing as may
be required and ultimately to attain profitability. If the Company
raises additional funds through the issuance of equity, the
percentage ownership of current shareholders could be reduced, and
such securities might have rights, preferences or privileges senior
to the rights, preferences and privileges of the Company’s
common stock. Additional financing may not be available upon
acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or
are not available on acceptable terms, the Company may not be able
to take advantage of prospective business endeavors or
opportunities, which could significantly and materially restrict
its future plans for developing its business and achieving
commercial revenues. If the Company is unable to obtain the
necessary capital, the Company may have to cease
operations.
Working Capital Deficiency
|
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Current
assets
|
$312,195
|
$6,158
|
Current
liabilities
|
2,696,890
|
4,842,514
|
Working capital
deficiency
|
$2,384,695
|
$4,836,356
|
The
increase in current assets is mainly due to an increase in cash and
cash equivalents and prepaid expenses for the year ended March 31,
2017. The decrease in current liabilities is primarily due to
extinguishment of certain notes payable in default to a related
party of approximately $2,300,000 in principal and related accrued
interest. Management continues to attempt to raise additional
capital in order to increase the Company’s cash position and
pay down current liabilities.
Cash Flows
|
Year Ended March
31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Net cash used in
operating activities
|
$(722,215)
|
$(1,205,372)
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
-
|
(35,980)
|
Net cash provided
by financing activities
|
804,252
|
1,026,636
|
Increase (decrease)
in cash and cash equivalents
|
$82,037
|
$(214,716)
|
The
decrease in net cash used in operating activities in the year ended
March 31, 2017 is mainly related to non-cash adjustments, including
a gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $2,339,353 and
other non-cash adjustments related to the issuance of the new
convertible debentures and a new bank loan. The decrease in cash
provided by financing activities is mainly due to there not being
significant sales of common stock in the fiscal year ended March
31, 2017 as compared to the previous year. However, this was offset
by approximately $657,000 proceeds from notes payable with related
parties, $45,000 proceeds from a bank loan, and $150,000 net
proceeds from the issuance of convertible debentures.
Given
our cash position of approximately $32,000 as of June 27, 2017,
management believes that our cash on hand and working capital are
not sufficient to meet our current anticipated cash requirements
through our fiscal year 2018.
Future Financing
We will
require additional funds to implement our growth strategy for our
business. In addition, while we have received capital from various
private placements that have enabled us to fund our operations,
these funds have been largely used to develop our processes,
although additional funds are needed for other corporate
operational and working capital purposes. We have potential future
closings under existing convertible debentures in the aggregate
principal amount of up to $500,000. However, not including funds
needed for capital expenditures or to pay down existing debt and
trade payables, we anticipate that we will need to raise an
additional $750,000 to cover all of our operational expenses over
the next 12 months. These funds may be raised through equity
financing, debt financing, or other sources, which may result in
further dilution in the equity ownership of our shares. There can
be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us
when needed or, if available, that such financing can be obtained
on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the
additional necessary financing on a timely basis, or if we are
unable to generate significant revenues from operations, we will
not be able to meet our other obligations as they become due, and
we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease our
operations.
32
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have
no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably
likely to have a current or future effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources that is material to stockholders.
Effects of Inflation
We do
not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our
business, revenues or operating results during the periods
presented.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
significant accounting policies are more fully described in the
notes to our financial statements included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. We believe that
the accounting policies below are critical for one to fully
understand and evaluate our financial condition and results of
operations.
Fair Value Measurement
The
fair value measurement guidance clarifies that fair value is an
exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based
measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that
market participants would use in the valuation of an asset or
liability. It establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes
the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The
hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1
measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level
3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value
hierarchy under the fair value measurement guidance are described
below:
Level 1
- Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at
the measurement date for identical assets or
liabilities;
Level 2
- Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are
observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the asset or liability; or
Level 3
- Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both
significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable
(supported by little or no market activity).
Volatility in Stock-Based Compensation
The
volatility is based on historical volatilities of companies in
comparable stages as well as the historical volatility of companies
in the industry and, by statistical analysis of the daily
share-pricing model. The volatility of stock-based compensation
granted after March 31, 2017 is based on historical volatility of
the Company for the last two years.
Recent Accounting Standards
During
the year ended March 31, 2017 and through June 28, 2017, there were
several new accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Each of these
pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be adopted by the
Company. Management does not believe the adoption of any of these
accounting pronouncements has had or will have a material impact on
the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
33
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June
2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities
(Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting
Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities
Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation (“ASU 2014-10”).
The amendments in ASU 2014-10 remove an exception provided to
development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for
determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. The
revised consolidation standards are effective for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim
periods within that reporting period, with early application
permitted. The Company has elected to early adopt the provisions of
ASU 2014-10 for these consolidated financial
statements.
In
August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial
Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of
Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a
Going Concern. ASU 2014-15 defines management’s
responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about
an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and
to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this ASU
are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016,
and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter, although
early adoption is permitted. The Company’s consolidated
financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
reflect the adoption of this guidance.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In
May 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts
with Customers,” which requires an entity to recognize the
amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the
transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09
will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S.
GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for
annual reporting periods for public business entities beginning
after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that
reporting period. The new standard permits the use of either the
retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company
is currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on
its financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has
not yet selected a transition method nor determined the effect of
the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.
In
February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard
requires all leases that have a term of over 12 months to
be recognized on the balance sheet
with the liability for lease payments and the corresponding
right-of-use asset initially measured at the present value of
amounts expected to be paid over the term. Recognition of the costs
of these leases on the income statement will be dependent upon
their classification as either an operating or a financing lease.
Costs of an operating lease will continue to be recognized as a
single operating expense on a straight-line basis over the lease
term. Costs for a financing lease will be disaggregated and
recognized as both an operating expense (for the amortization of
the right-of-use asset) and interest expense (for interest on the
lease liability). This standard will be effective for our interim
and annual periods beginning January 1, 2019, and must be applied
on a modified retrospective basis to leases existing at, or entered
into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period
presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted.
We are currently evaluating the timing of adoption and the
potential impact of this standard on our financial position, but we
do not expect it to have a material impact on our results of
operations.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Not
Applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The
information called for by Item 8 is included following the "Index
to Financial Statements" on page F-1 contained in this annual
report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
34
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer (who is our Principal Executive Officer) and our Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer (who is our Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), of the effectiveness of
the design of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of March 31, 2017
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation,
our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective as of March 31, 2017 in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules
and forms. This conclusion is based on findings that constituted
material weaknesses. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a
combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over
financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility
that a material misstatement of the Company’s interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely
basis.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, which
currently consists of our Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer, we
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting based on criteria established in
the framework in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(“COSO” - 2013) and SEC guidance on conducting such
assessments. Our management concluded, as of March 31, 2017, that
our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.
Management realized there were deficiencies in the design or
operation of the Company’s internal control that adversely
affected the Company’s internal controls which management
considers to be material weaknesses.
In
performing the above-referenced assessment, management had
concluded that as of March 31, 2017, there were deficiencies in the
design or operation of our internal control that adversely affected
our internal controls, which management considers to be material
weaknesses, including those described below:
(i) Lack of Formal Policies and Procedures.
We utilize a third party independent contractor for the preparation
of our financial statements. Although the financial statements and
footnotes are reviewed by our management, we do not have a formal
policy to review significant accounting transactions and the
accounting treatment of such transactions. The third party
independent contractor is not involved in the day to day operations
of the Company and may not be provided information from management
on a timely basis to allow for adequate reporting/consideration of
certain transactions.
(ii) Audit
Committee and Financial Expert. We do not have a formal
audit committee with a financial expert, and thus we lack the board
oversight role within the financial reporting process.
(iii) Insufficient
Resources. We have insufficient quantity of dedicated
resources and experienced personnel involved in reviewing and
designing internal controls. As a result, a material misstatement
of the interim and annual financial statements could occur and not
be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
(iv) Entity
Level Risk Assessment. We did not perform an entity level
risk assessment to evaluate the implication of relevant risks on
financial reporting, including the impact of potential fraud
related risks and the risks related to non-routine transactions, if
any, on internal control over financial reporting. Lack of an
entity-level risk assessment constituted an internal control design
deficiency which resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a
material error would not have been prevented or detected, and
constituted a material weakness.
(v) Lack of Personnel with GAAP Experience.
We lack personnel with formal training to properly analyze and
record complex transactions in accordance with U.S.
GAAP.
35
Our
management feels the weaknesses identified above have not had any
material affect on our financial results. However, we are currently
reviewing our disclosure controls and procedures related to these
material weaknesses and expect to implement changes in the near
term as resources permit, including identifying specific areas
within our governance, accounting and financial reporting processes
to add adequate resources to potentially mitigate these material
weaknesses.
Our
management will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness
of our internal controls and procedures and our internal controls
over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and is committed to
taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or
improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of
any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter
how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those
systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and
presentation.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting
during the year ended March 31, 2017 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control
over financial reporting. We believe that a control system, no
matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute
assurance that the objectives of the control system are met, and no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within any company
have been detected.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
On
January 10, 2017, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares to a
consultant for services to be rendered over six months. The fair
value of the shares was $440,000, based on the market value of our
common stock on the date of issuance.
On
January 23, 2017, the Company issued 1,225,715 shares to two
unrelated parties in exchange for the settlement of debt owed by
NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc., a related party (Note 8), previous to
the Company’s January 2015 reverse acquisition. At the time
of the acquisition the Company was not made aware of the debt and
therefore did not assume the liability in the purchase agreement.
When the Company was presented with the debt during the fiscal year
ending March 31, 2017, the Company agreed to assume and settle this
debt by the issuance of common shares. The fair value of the shares
issued, based on the market value of the common shares on the date
of the settlement agreement, was $563,829.
On
January 23, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement and issued a Convertible Note in the original principal
amount of $262,500 to an accredited investor, along with a Warrant
to purchase 350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, in
exchange for a purchase price of $250,000. The Company received
$50,000 upon closing, with additional consideration to be paid to
the Company in such amounts and at such dates as the holder may
choose in its sole discretion. The warrants are exercisable over a
period of five (5) years at an exercise price of $0.60, subject to
adjustment. The note is convertible into shares of the
Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.35 per
share, subject to adjustment. The maturity date of the note shall
be two years form the date of each payment of consideration
thereunder. A one-time interest charge of twelve percent (12%)
shall be applied on the issuance date and payable on the maturity
date. The note contains a provision regarding piggyback
registration rights, which states the Company shall include all
shares issuable upon conversion of the note in the next
registration statement the Company files with the SEC. The Company
intends to use the proceeds of the sale for general working capital
purposes.
36
On
March 16, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement with an accredited investor related to the purchase and
sale of certain convertible debentures in the aggregate principal
amount of up to $400,000 for an aggregate purchase price of up to
$360,000. The agreement contemplates three separate convertible
debentures, with each maturing three years following the date of
issuance. On March 28, 2017, the Company issued the first
Convertible Debenture in the principal amount of $100,000 for a
purchase price of $90,000. The closing of the second Convertible
Debenture is to occur upon mutual agreement of the parties, at any
time within sixty (60) to ninety (90) days following the original
signing closing date, in the principal amount of $150,000 for a
purchase price of $135,000. The closing of the third Convertible
Debenture will occur upon mutual agreement of the parties within
sixty (60) to ninety (90) days following the second closing, in the
principal amount of $150,000 for a purchase price of $135,000.
Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued
100,000 shares of restricted stock as a commitment fee in
consideration of the expenses and analysis performed in connection
with the contemplated investment. The fair value of the shares
issued as a commitment fee was $34,000, based on the market value
of our common stock on the date of issuance. The Convertible
Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.30 for the first one
hundred eighty (180) days. After one hundred eighty (180) days, or
in an event of default, the conversion price will be the lower of
$0.30 or sixty percent (60%) of the lowest closing bid price over
the 20 trading days preceding the date of conversion. The
Securities Purchase Agreement contains a provision regarding
piggyback registration rights in the event the Company contemplates
making a registered offering under the Securities Act or proposes
to file a registration statement covering any of its securities
within the eighteen (18) months following the signing closing date.
The Company intends to use the proceeds of the sale for general
working capital purposes.
Between
January 1, 2017 and March 31, 2017, the Company entered into two
Private Placement Subscription Agreements and issued two Six
Percent (6%) Unsecured Convertible Notes to Dragon Acquisitions, an
affiliate of the Company whose managing member is William Delgado,
the Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, and a director of the
Company. The first note was issued on January 20, 2017, in the
principal amount of $20,000, and the second note was issued on
March 14, 2017, in the principal amount of $20,000. The notes
accrue interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum, and
mature one (1) year from the date of issuance. Upon an event of
default, the default interest rate will be increased to twenty-four
percent (24%), and the total amount of principal and accrued
interest shall become immediately due and payable at the
holder’s discretion. The notes are convertible into shares of
the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share, subject to adjustment.
Subsequent to the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued an additional
Six Percent (6%) Unsecured Convertible Note to Dragon Acquisitions.
The note was issued on April 20, 2017 in the principal amount of
$140,000. The note accrues interest at the rate of six percent (6%)
per annum, and matures one (1) year from the date of issuance. Upon
an event of default, the default interest rate will be increased to
twenty-four percent (24%), and the total amount of principal and
accrued interest shall become immediately due and payable at the
holder’s discretion. The note is convertible into shares of
the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share, subject to adjustment.
On May
2, 2017, the Company sold 100,000 shares of its common stock at
$0.25 per share, for a total financing of $25,000.
The
foregoing issuances were exempt from the registration requirements
of the Securities Act pursuant to the exemption for transactions by
an issuer not involved in any public offering under
Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 of
Regulation D.
37
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Set
forth below are the present directors and executive officers of the
Company. Except as set forth below, there are no other persons who
have been nominated or chosen to become directors, nor are there
any other persons who have been chosen to become executive
officers. Other than as set forth below, there are no arrangements
or understandings between any of the directors, officers and other
persons pursuant to which such person was selected as a director or
an officer.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Since
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Bill G.
Williams
|
|
|
82
|
|
Chairman
of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Gerald
Easterling
|
|
|
69
|
|
President,
Secretary, Director
|
|
|
2015
|
|
William
Delgado
|
|
|
58
|
|
Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer, Director
|
|
|
2014
|
|
The
Board of Directors is comprised of only one class. All of the
directors serve for a term of one year and until their successors
are elected at the Company’s annual shareholders meeting and
are qualified, subject to removal by the Company’s
shareholders. Each executive officer serves, at the pleasure of the
Board of Directors, for a term of one year and until his successor
is elected at a meeting of the Board of Directors and is
qualified.
Our
Board of Directors believes that all members of the Board and all
executive officers encompass a range of talent, skill, and
experience sufficient to provide sound and prudent guidance with
respect to our operations and interests. The information below with
respect to our directors and executive officers includes each
individual’s experience, qualifications, attributes, and
skills that led our Board of Directors to the conclusion that he or
she should serve as a director and/or executive
officer.
Biographies
Set
forth below are brief accounts of the business experience during
the past five years of each director, executive officer and
significant employee of the Company.
Bill G. Williams – Co-Founder, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Mr.
Williams has served as Chairman of the Board and CEO of NSH since
its inception in 2001. From 1997 to 2003, he was Chairman and CEO
of Direct Wireless Communications, Inc. and its successor Health
Discovery Corporation, a public company listed on the OTCBB
exchange. From 1990 to 1997, Mr. Williams was Chairman and CEO of
Cafe Quick Enterprises, which uses a unique, patented air
impingement technology to cook fresh and frozen food in vending
machines. From 1985 to 1990, Mr. Williams was Chairman and CEO of
Ameritron Corporation, a multi-business holding company. Mr.
Williams has also served a member of the board of directors of
NaturalShrimp Corporation and NaturalShrimp Global, Inc. since
2001. We believe Mr. Williams is qualified to serve on our board of
directors because of his business experiences, including his
experience as a director of companies in similar industries, as
described above.
Gerald Easterling – Co-Founder, President and
Director
Mr.
Easterling has served as President and a director of NSH since its
inception in 2001. Mr. Easterling has experience in the food
business and related industries. In the five years prior to the
formation of NSH, Mr. Easterling was Chairman of the Board of Excel
Vending Companies. He also was President and Director of Cafe Quick
Enterprises and has been a member of the board since 1988. Mr.
Easterling has also served a member of the board of directors of
NaturalShrimp Corporation and NaturalShrimp Global, Inc. since
2001. We believe Mr. Easterling is qualified to serve on our board
of directors because of his business experiences, including his
experience as a director of companies in similar industries, as
described above.
38
Thomas Untermeyer – Co-Founder and Chief Technology
Consultant
Mr.
Untermeyer is a co-founder of NSH, has served as an engineering
consultant to NSH since 2001, and is the Company’s Chief
Technology Officer. Mr. Untermeyer holds a Bachelor of Science in
electrical engineering from St. Mary’s University. Mr.
Untermeyer also serves as Senior Program Manager with Southwest
Research Institute, San Antonio. Mr. Untermeyer is the inventor of
the initial technology behind the computer-controlled
shrimp-raising system used by the Company.
William J. Delgado – Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
(former President of Multiplayer Online Dragon, Inc.) and
Director
Mr.
Delgado has served as Director of the Company since May 19, 2014.
Since August 2004, Mr. Delgado has served as a Director, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global
Digital Solutions, Inc. (“GDSI”), a publicly traded
company that provides cyber arms manufacturing, complementary
security and technology solutions and knowledge-based,
cyber-related, culturally attuned social consulting in unsettled
areas. Effective August 12, 2013, Mr. Delgado assumed the position
of Executive Vice President of GDSI. He began his career with
Pacific Telephone in the Outside Plant Construction. He moved to
the network engineering group and concluded his career at Pacific
Bell as the Chief Budget Analyst for the Northern California
region. Mr. Delgado founded All Star Telecom in late 1991,
specializing in OSP construction and engineering and systems
cabling. All Star Telecom was sold to International FiberCom in
April 1999. After leaving International FiberCom in 2002, Mr.
Delgado became President/CEO of Pacific Comtel in San Diego,
California, which was acquired by GDSI in 2004. Mr.
Delgado holds a BS with honors in Applied Economics from the
University of San Francisco and Graduate studies in
Telecommunications Management at Southern Methodist University. We
believe Mr. Delgado is qualified to serve on our board of directors
because of his business experiences, including his experience in
management and as a director of public companies, as described
above.
Family Relationships
There
are no other family relationships between or among any of our
directors, executive officers and any incoming directors or
executive officers.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
No
director, executive officer, significant employee or control person
of the Company has been involved in any legal proceeding listed in
Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K in the past 10 years.
Committees of the Board
Our
Board of Directors held one formal meeting in the fiscal year-ended
March 31, 2017. Otherwise, all proceedings of the Board of
Directors were conducted by resolutions consented to in writing by
the directors and filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the
directors. Such resolutions consented to in writing by the
directors entitled to vote on that resolution at a meeting of the
directors are, according to the Nevada Revised Statutes and the
bylaws of our Company, as valid and effective as if they had been
passed at a meeting of the directors duly called and held. We do
not presently have a policy regarding director attendance at
meetings.
We do
not currently have a standing audit, nominating or compensation
committee of the Board of Directors, or any committee performing
similar functions. Our Board of Directors performs the functions of
audit, nominating and compensation committees.
Our
Board of Directors has not established a separate audit committee
within the meaning of Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
Instead, the entire Board of Directors acts as the audit committee
within the meaning of Section 3(a)(58)(B) of the Exchange Act and
will continue to do so until such time as a separate audit
committee has been established.
39
Audit Committee Financial Expert
We
currently have not designated anyone as an “audit committee
financial expert,” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation
S-K as we have not yet created an audit committee of the Board of
Directors.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our executive
officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our
common stock, to file reports regarding ownership of, and
transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and to provide us with copies of those
filings.
Based
solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or
written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe
that during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, one of our
officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners
failed to comply on a timely basis with all applicable filing
requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
On
January 20, 2017, the Company issued a convertible note in the
principal amount of $20,000 to Dragon Acquisitions, an affiliate of
the Company whose managing member is William Delgado, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company. On March 14, 2017, the Company
issued a convertible note in the principal amount of $20,000 to
Dragon Acquisitions. On April 20, 2017, the Company issued a
convertible note in the principal amount of $140,000 to Dragon
Acquisitions. These notes are convertible into shares of the
Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share. William Delgado, a director and executive officer of the
Company and managing member of Dragon Acquisitions, should have
filed a Form 4 in connection with the issuance of each of the
foregoing convertible notes.
Nominations to the Board of Directors
Our
directors play a critical role in guiding our strategic direction
and oversee the management of the Company. Board candidates are
considered based upon various criteria, such as their broad-based
business and professional skills and experiences, a global business
and social perspective, concern for the long-term interests of the
stockholders, diversity, and personal integrity and
judgment.
In
addition, directors must have time available to devote to Board
activities and to enhance their knowledge in the growing business.
Accordingly, we seek to attract and retain highly qualified
directors who have sufficient time to attend to their substantial
duties and responsibilities to the Company.
In
carrying out its responsibilities, the Board will consider
candidates suggested by stockholders. If a stockholder wishes to
formally place a candidate’s name in nomination, however, he
or she must do so in accordance with the provisions of the
Company’s Bylaws. Suggestions for candidates to be evaluated
by the proposed directors must be sent to the Board of Directors,
c/o NaturalShrimp Incorporated, 15150 Preston Rd, Suite 300,
Dallas, TX 75248.
Director Nominations
As of
March 31, 2017, we did not effect any material changes to the
procedures by which our shareholders may recommend nominees to our
Board of Directors.
Board Leadership Structure and Role on Risk Oversight
Bill G.
Williams currently serves as the Company’s principal
executive officer and Chairman of the Company’s Board of
Directors. The Company determined this leadership structure was
appropriate for the Company due to our small size and limited
operations and resources. The Board of Directors will continue to
evaluate the Company’s leadership structure and modify as
appropriate based on the size, resources and operations of the
Company. It is anticipated that the Board of Directors will
establish procedures to determine an appropriate role for the Board
of Directors in the Company’s risk oversight
function.
40
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
No
interlocking relationship exists between our board of directors and
the board of directors or compensation committee of any other
company, nor has any interlocking relationship existed in the
past.
Code of Ethics
The
Company has adopted a written code of ethics that governs the
Company’s employees, officers and directors. A copy of such
code of ethics is available upon written request to the
Company.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
General Philosophy
Our
Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and
administering the Company’s executive and director
compensation.
Executive Compensation
The
following summary compensation table indicates the cash and
non-cash compensation earned from the Company during the fiscal
years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 by the current and former
executive officers of the Company and each of the other two highest
paid executives or directors, if any, whose total compensation
exceeded $100,000 during those periods.
Summary Compensation Table
Name and
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
Option
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
|
All
Other
|
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Awards
|
Awards
|
Compensation
|
Compensation
|
Total
|
Bill G.
Williams,
|
|
2017
|
$96,000
|
$-
|
-
|
-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$96,000
|
Chairman of the
Board, CEO
|
|
2016
|
$96,000
|
$-
|
-
|
-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$96,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald
Easterling,
|
|
2017
|
$96,000
|
$-
|
-
|
-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$96,000
|
President
|
|
2016
|
$96,000
|
$-
|
-
|
-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$96,000
|
Employment Agreements
We have
employment agreements in place with Bill G. Williams, our Chief
Executive Officer, and Gerald Easterling, our
President.
Bill G. Williams
On
April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement
with Bill G. Williams as the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer. The agreement is terminable at will and provides for a
base annual salary of $96,000. In addition, the agreement provides
that the Mr. Williams is entitled, at the sole and absolute
discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, to receive
performance bonuses. Mr. Williams will also be entitled to certain
benefits including health insurance and monthly allowances for cell
phone and automobile expenses.
41
The
agreement provides that in the event Mr. Williams is terminated
without cause or resigns for good reason (each as defined in the
agreement), Mr. Williams will receive, as severance, his base
salary for a period of 60 months following the date of termination.
In the event of a change of control of the Company, Mr. Williams
may elect to terminate the agreement within 30 days thereafter and
upon such termination would receive a lump sum payment equal to
500% of his base salary. The agreement contains certain restrictive
covenants relating to non-competition, non-solicitation of
customers and non-solicitation of employees for a period of one
year following termination of the agreement.
Gerald Easterling
On
April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement
with Gerald Easterling as the Company’s President. The
agreement is terminable at will and provides for a base annual
salary of $96,000. In addition, the agreement provides that the Mr.
Easterling is entitled, at the sole and absolute discretion of the
Company’s Board of Directors, to receive performance bonuses.
Mr. Easterling will also be entitled to certain benefits including
health insurance and monthly allowances for cell phone and
automobile expenses.
The
agreement provides that in the event Mr. Easterling is terminated
without cause or resigns for good reason (each as defined in the
agreement), Mr. Easterling will receive, as severance, his base
salary for a period of 60 months following the date of termination.
In the event of a change of control of the Company, Mr. Easterling
may elect to terminate the agreement within 30 days thereafter and
upon such termination would receive a lump sum payment equal to
500% of his base salary.
The
agreement contains certain restrictive covenants relating to
non-competition, non-solicitation of customers and non-solicitation
of employees for a period of one year following termination of the
agreement.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-Control
SEC
regulations state that we must disclose information regarding
agreements, plans or arrangements that provide for payments or
benefits to our executive officers in connection with any
termination of employment or change in control of the Company. Such
payments are set forth above in the section entitled
“Employment Agreements.”
None of
our executive officers or directors received, nor do we have any
arrangements to pay out, any bonus, stock awards, option awards,
non-equity incentive plan compensation, or non-qualified deferred
compensation.
Compensation of Directors
We have
no standard arrangement to compensate directors for their services
in their capacity as directors. Directors are not paid for meetings
attended. However, we intend to review and consider future
proposals regarding board compensation. All travel and lodging
expenses associated with corporate matters are reimbursed by us, if
and when incurred.
Stock Option Plans - Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year
End
None.
Pension Table
None.
Retirement Plans
We do
not offer any annuity, pension, or retirement benefits to be paid
to any of our officers, directors, or employees in the event of
retirement. There are also no compensatory plans or arrangements
with respect to any individual named above which results or will
result from the resignation, retirement, or any other termination
of employment with our company, or from a change in the control of
our Company.
42
Compensation Committee
The
Company does not have a separate Compensation Committee. Instead,
the Company’s Board of Directors reviews and approves
executive compensation policies and practices, reviews salaries and
bonuses for other officers, administers the Company’s stock
option plans and other benefit plans, if any, and considers other
matters.
Risk Management Considerations
We
believe that our compensation policies and practices for our
employees, including our executive officers, do not create risks
that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our
Company.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The
following table sets forth certain information as of June 26, 2017,
with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock for
(i) each director and officer, (ii) all of our directors and
officers as a group, and (iii) each person known to us to own
beneficially five percent (5%) or more of the outstanding shares of
our common stock. As of June 26, 2017, there were 92,408,298 shares
of common stock outstanding.
|
Shares
Beneficially
|
Percentage
|
Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
Owned
|
Owned(2)
|
|
|
|
Directors
and Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bill G.
Williams
15150 Preston Road,
Suite 300
Dallas, TX
75248
|
75,520,240(3)
|
81.72%
|
Gerald
Easterling
15150 Preston Road,
Suite 300
Dallas, TX
75248
|
75,520,240(4)
|
81.72%
|
Tom
Untermeyer
15150 Preston Road,
Suite 300
Dallas, TX
75248
|
0
|
0.00%
|
William
Delgado
15150 Preston Road,
Suite 300
Dallas, TX
75248
|
6,520,719(5)
|
7.01%
|
Total:
|
82,124,294
|
88.22%
|
|
|
|
5% Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
NaturalShrimp
Holdings, Inc.
2086 N. Valley
Mills Rd.
Waco, TX
76710
|
75,520,240
|
81.72%
|
|
|
|
Dragon Acquisitions
LLC
1621 Central
Avenue
Cheyenne, WY
82001
|
6,520,719(5)
|
7.01%
|
43
(1)
|
Beneficial
ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under
the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, shares of
common stock which an individual or group has a right to acquire
within 60 days pursuant to the exercise of any option, warrant or
right, or through the conversion of a security, are deemed to be
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership
of such individual or group, but are not deemed to be beneficially
owned and outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person shown in the table.
|
(2)
|
Based
on 92,408,298 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as
of June 26, 2017.
|
(3)
|
Bill G.
Williams is the indirect owner, together with Gerald Easterling, of
75,520,240 shares of common stock, which are directly held by
NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc. Mr. Williams is the Chairman of the
Board and the Chief Executive Office of NaturalShrimp Holdings,
Inc. and has shared voting and dispositive power over the shares
held by NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc.
|
(4)
|
Gerald
Easterling is the indirect owner, together with Bill G. Williams,
of 75,520,240 shares of common stock, which are directly held by
NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc. Mr. Easterling is the President of
NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc. and has shared voting and dispositive
power over the shares held by NaturalShrimp Holdings,
Inc.
|
(5)
|
William
Delgado is the indirect owner of 6,520,719 shares of common stock,
which are directly held by Dragon Acquisitions LLC. The shares of
common stock beneficially owned by Dragon Acquisitions LLC, and
indirectly owned by William Delgado, include 600,000 shares of
common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible
notes held by Dragon Acquisitions LLC. Mr. Delgado is the managing
member of Dragon Acquisitions LLC and has shared voting and
dispositive power over the shares held by Dragon Acquisitions
LLC.
|
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
None.
Non-Cumulative Voting
The
holders of our shares of common stock do not have cumulative voting
rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of such
outstanding shares, voting for the election of Directors, can elect
all of the Directors to be elected, if they so choose. In such
event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to
elect any of our Directors.
Transfer Agent
Our
transfer agent is Island Stock Transfer, Inc., and is located at
15500 Roosevelt Boulevard, Suite 301, Clearwater, Florida 33760.
Their telephone number is (727) 289-0010.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Transactions with Related Persons
Except
as set out below, as of March 31, 2017, there have been no
transactions, or currently proposed transactions, in which we were
or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds the
lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total
assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in
which any of the following persons had or will have a direct or
indirect material interest:
●
any director or
executive officer of our company;
●
any person who
beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more
than 5% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of
common stock;
●
any promoters and
control persons; and
44
●
any member of the
immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings and
in laws) of any of the foregoing persons.
NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc.
On
November 26, 2014, Multiplayer Online Dragon, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (“MYDR”), entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement (the “Agreement”) with NaturalShrimp
Holdings, Inc. a Delaware corporation (“NSH”), pursuant
to which MYDR was to acquire substantially all of the assets of NSH
which assets consist primarily of all of the issued and outstanding
shares of capital stock of NaturalShrimp Corporation
(“NSC”), a Delaware corporation, and NaturalShrimp
Global, Inc. (“NS Global”), a Delaware corporation, and
certain real property located outside of San Antonio, Texas (the
“Assets”).
On
January 30, 2015, MYDR consummated the acquisition of the Assets
pursuant to the Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the
Agreement, the MYDR issued 75,520,240 shares of its common stock to
NSH as consideration for the Assets. As a result of the
transaction, NSH acquired 88.62% of MYDR’s issued and
outstanding shares of common stock, NSC and NS Global became
MYDR’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, and MYDR changed its
principal business to a global shrimp farming company.
There
were no material relationships between the MYDR and NSH or between
the Company’s or NSH’s respective affiliates,
directors, or officers or associates thereof, other than in respect
of the Agreement. Effective March 3, 2015, MYDR amended its
Articles of Incorporation to change its name to
“NaturalShrimp Incorporated”.
On
January 1, 2016 we entered into a note payable agreement with NSH.
Between January 16, 2016 and March 7, 2016, we borrowed $134,750
under this agreement. The note payable has no set monthly payment
or maturity date with a stated interest rate of 2%.
Bill G. Williams
We have
entered into several working capital notes payable to Bill
Williams, an officer, a director, and a shareholder of the Company,
for a total of $486,500 since inception. These notes are demand
notes, had stock issued in lieu of interest and have no set monthly
payment or maturity date. The balance of these notes at both March
31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 was $426,404, and is classified as a
current liability on our consolidated balance sheets. We repaid $0
during the year ended March 31, 2017. At March 31, 2017 and March
31, 2016, accrued interest payable was $172,808 and $142,296,
respectively.
William Delgado
Between
January 1, 2017 and March 31, 2017, we entered into two Private
Placement Subscription Agreements and issued two Six Percent (6%)
Unsecured Convertible Notes to Dragon Acquisitions, whose managing
member is William Delgado, the Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer,
and a director of the Company. The first note was issued on January
20, 2017, in the principal amount of $20,000, and the second note
was issued on March 14, 2017, in the principal amount of $20,000.
The notes accrue interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per
annum, and mature one (1) year from the date of issuance. Upon an
event of default, the default interest rate will be increased to
twenty-four percent (24%), and the total amount of principal and
accrued interest shall become immediately due and payable at the
holder’s discretion. The notes are convertible into shares of
our common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per share, subject
to adjustment.
Subsequent to the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued an additional
Six Percent (6%) Unsecured Convertible Note to Dragon Acquisitions.
The note was issued on April 20, 2017 in the principal amount of
$140,000. The note accrues interest at the rate of six percent (6%)
per annum, and matures one (1) year from the date of issuance. Upon
an event of default, the default interest rate will be increased to
twenty-four percent (24%), and the total amount of principal and
accrued interest shall become immediately due and payable at the
holder’s discretion. The note is convertible into shares of
the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share, subject to adjustment.
45
Gerald Easterling
On
January 10, 2017, we entered into a promissory note agreement with
Community National Bank in the principal amount of $245,000, with
an annual interest rate of 5% and a maturity date of January 10,
2020 (the “CNB Note”). The CNB Note is secured by
certain real property owned by the Company in La Coste, Texas, and
is also personally guaranteed by the Company’s President and
Chairman of the Board, as well as certain non-affiliated
shareholders of the Company. As consideration for the guarantee,
the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock to the
guaranteeing shareholders, not including the Company’s
President and Chairman of the Board, which was recognized as debt
issuance costs. The fair value of this issuance is estimated to be
$264,000, based on the market value of our common stock on the date
of issuance.
Named Executive Officers and Current Directors
For
information regarding compensation for our named executive officers
and current directors, see “Executive
Compensation”.
Director Independence
Our
board of directors consists of Bill G. Williams, Gerald Easterling
and William Delgado. Our securities are quoted on the OTC Markets
Group, which does not have any director independence requirements.
We evaluate independence by the standards for director independence
established by applicable laws, rules, and listing standards
including, without limitation, the standards for independent
directors established by The New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the
NASDAQ National Market, and the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Subject
to some exceptions, these standards generally provide that a
director will not be independent if (a) the director is, or in the
past three years has been, an employee of ours; (b) a member of the
director’s immediate family is, or in the past three years
has been, an executive officer of ours; (c) the director or a
member of the director’s immediate family has received more
than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from us other than
for service as a director (or for a family member, as a
non-executive employee); (d) the director or a member of the
director’s immediate family is, or in the past three years
has been, employed in a professional capacity by our independent
public accountants, or has worked for such firm in any capacity on
our audit; (e) the director or a member of the director’s
immediate family is, or in the past three years has been, employed
as an executive officer of a company where one of our executive
officers serves on the compensation committee; or (f) the director
or a member of the director’s immediate family is an
executive officer of a company that makes payments to, or receives
payments from, us in an amount which, in any twelve-month period
during the past three years, exceeds the greater of $1,000,000 or
two percent of that other company’s consolidated gross
revenues. Based on these standards, we have determined that none of
our directors are independent directors.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Audit and Accounting Fees
Effective April 11,
2015, the Board of Directors of the Company engaged Turner, Stone
& Company (“TSC”) as its independent registered
public accounting firm to audit the Company’s annual
financial statements. The following tables set forth the fees
billed to the Company for professional services rendered by TSC for
the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:
Services
|
2017
|
2016
|
Audit
fees
|
$29,300
|
$48,700
|
Audit related
fees
|
-
|
-
|
Tax
fees
|
-
|
-
|
All other
fees
|
-
|
-
|
Total
fees
|
$29,300
|
$48,700
|
Audit Fees
The
audit fees were paid for the audit services of our annual and
quarterly reports and issuing consents for our registration
statements.
46
Tax Fees
There
were no tax fees paid to TSC.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our
board of directors preapproves all services provided by our
independent registered public accounting firm. All of the above
services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of
directors before the respective services were
rendered.
47
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
(2)
|
Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or
succession
|
2.1
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated November 26, 2014, by and between
Multiplayer Online Dragon, Inc. and NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on December 3, 2014).
|
(3)
|
(i) Articles of Incorporation; and (ii) Bylaws
|
3.1(a)
|
Articles of
Incorporation (incorporated by reference to our Registration
Statement on Form S-1 originally filed on June 11,
2009).
|
3.1(b)
|
Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to our Amended
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on May 19,
2014).
|
3.2
|
Bylaws
(incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form
S-1 originally filed on June 11, 2009).
|
(4)
|
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including
Indentures
|
4.1
|
Specimen Common
Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to our Registration
Statement on Form S-1 filed on December 29, 2008)
|
4.2
|
Form
of Registrant’s 10% Senior Convertible Promissory Note
(incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form
8-K filed on October 17, 2013)
|
(10)
|
Material Agreements
|
10.1
|
Business Loan
Agreement, dated September 13, 2005, by and among NaturalShrimp
Holdings, Inc., Amarillo National Bank, NSC, NaturalShrimp
International, Inc., NaturalShrimp San Antonio, L.P., Shirley
Williams, Gerald Easterling, Mary Ann Untermeyer, and High Plain
Christian Ministries Foundation, as amended, modified and assigned
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on February 11, 2015).
|
10.2
|
Secured Promissory
Note, dated September 13, 2005, issued by NaturalShrimp Holdings,
Inc. to Amarillo National Bank in the original principal amount of
$1,500,000, as amended, modified and assigned (incorporated by
reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 11,
2015).
|
10.3
|
Assignment
Agreement, dated March 26, 2009, by and between Baptist Community
Services, Amarillo National Bank and NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on February 11, 2015).
|
10.4
|
Fifth
Forbearance Agreement, dated January 30, 2015, by and between the
Company, NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc. and Baptist Community
Services (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form
8-K filed on February 11, 2015).
|
10.5
|
Stock
Pledge Agreement, dated January 30, 2015, by and between the
Company and Baptist Community Services (incorporated by reference
to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 11,
2015).
|
10.6
|
Agreement
Regarding Loan Documents, dated January 30, 2015, by and between
the Company and NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 11,
2015).
|
10.7
|
Exclusive Rights
Agreement, dated August 19, 2014, between NaturalShrimp Holdings,
Inc., its subsidiaries and F&T Water Solutions, LLC
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on February 11, 2015).
|
10.8
|
Members Agreement,
dated August 19, 2014, between NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc.,
F&T Water Solutions, LLC and the members of Natural Aquatic
Systems, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2015).
|
10.9
|
Form
of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to our Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2015).
|
10.10
|
Form
of Promissory Note with Shirley K. Williams, Kay Chafin and Jack
Heald (incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on July 28, 2015).
|
48
10.11
|
Form
of Loan Agreement with Bill G. Williams (incorporated by reference
to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 28,
2015).
|
10.12
|
Form
of Security Agreement with Kay Chafin and Jack Heald (incorporated
by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 28,
2015).
|
10.13
|
Form
of Line of Credit Agreement with Extraco Bank (incorporated by
reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 28,
2015).
|
10.14
|
Employment
Agreement dated April 1, 2015 with Bill G. Williams (incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 7,
2015).
|
10.15
|
Employment
Agreement dated April 1, 2015 with Gerald Easterling (incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 7,
2015).
|
10.16*
|
Form
of Private Placement Subscription Agreement and 6% Unsecured
Convertible Note with Dragon Acquisitions LLC.
|
10.17
|
Form
of Promissory Note dated January 10, 2017 with Community National
Bank (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed on February 14, 2017).
|
10.18
|
Form
of Guaranty made by Gerald Easterling to Community National Bank
(incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed on February 14, 2017).
|
10.19
|
Payoff
Letter, Termination and Release dated January 13, 2017 from Baptist
Community Services (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 14, 2017).
|
10.20*
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated January 23, 2017 with Vista Capital
Investments, LLC.
|
10.21*
|
Warrant to
Purchase Shares of Common Stock issued January 23, 2017 to Vista
Capital Investments, LLC.
|
10.22*
|
Convertible Note
dated January 23, 2017 issued to Vista Capital Investments,
LLC.
|
10.23*
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated March 16, 2017 with Peak One Opportunity
Fund, L.P.
|
10.24*
|
Convertible
Debenture dated March 28, 2017 issued to Peak One Opportunity Fund,
L.P.
|
(31)
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
|
31.1*
|
Section 302
Certification under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal
Executive Officer
|
31.2*
|
Section 302
Certification under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|
(32)
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
32.1*
|
Section 906
Certification under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal
Executive Officer
|
32.2*
|
Section 906
Certification under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|
(101)*
|
Interactive Data Files
|
*
Filed herewith.
**
Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the
Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed
or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of
Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those
sections.
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
NATURALSHRIMP INCORPORATED
By: /s/
Bill G. Williams
|
|
Bill G.
Williams
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Board (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
Date:
June 29, 2017
|
|
By: /s/
William Delgado
|
|
William
Delgado
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
Date:
June 29, 2017
|
|
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signatures
|
|
Title(s)
|
|
Date
|
/s/ Bill G. Williams
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Chairman of
the
Board (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
Date:
June 29, 2017
|
Bill G.
Williams
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gerald Easterling
|
|
President
and Director
|
|
Date:
June 29, 2017
|
Gerald
Easterling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William Delgado
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer
and
Director
|
|
Date:
June 29, 2017
|
William
Delgado
|
|
|
|
|
50
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NATURALSHRIMP INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
|
|
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
F-1
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
F-2
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
F-3
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit
|
F-4
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
F-5
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-6
|
51
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
To the
Shareholders of NaturalShrimp Incorporated:
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
NaturalShrimp Incorporated and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of March 31, 2017 and 2016 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
NaturalShrimp Incorporated and its subsidiaries as of March 31,
2017 and 2016 and the results of their consolidated operations and
their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations since
inception and has a working capital deficiency, both of which raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also
described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
/s/ Turner, Stone & Company, L.L.P.
Dallas,
Texas
June
29, 2017
F-1
NATURALSHRIMP INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
March 31, 2017
|
March 31, 2016
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$88,195
|
$6,158
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
224,000
|
-
|
|
|
|
Total
current assets
|
312,195
|
6,158
|
|
|
|
Fixed
assets
|
|
|
Land
|
202,293
|
202,293
|
Buildings
|
1,328,161
|
1,328,161
|
Machinery
and equipment
|
929,214
|
929,214
|
Autos
and trucks
|
14,063
|
14,063
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
22,060
|
22,060
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(1,221,419)
|
(1,161,144)
|
|
|
|
Fixed
assets, net
|
1,274,372
|
1,334,647
|
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
Deposits
|
10,500
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
Total
other assets
|
10,500
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
$1,597,067
|
$1,352,305
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$505,033
|
$568,806
|
Accrued
interest - related parties
|
178,922
|
320,822
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
317,499
|
154,558
|
Short-term
promissory note and lines of credit
|
145,964
|
837,469
|
Current
maturities of bank loan
|
7,310
|
-
|
Notes
payable - related parties
|
1,296,162
|
654,906
|
Notes
payable in default - related party
|
-
|
2,305,953
|
Derivative
liability
|
218,000
|
-
|
Warrant
liability
|
28,000
|
-
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
2,696,890
|
4,842,514
|
|
|
|
Bank
loan, less current maturities
|
235,690
|
-
|
Lines
of credit
|
651,498
|
|
Convertible
debentures, less debt discount of $100,000
|
50,000
|
-
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
3,634,079
|
4,842,514
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
deficit
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.0001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 0 and 0
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016,
respectively
|
-
|
-
|
Common
stock, $0.0001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 92,408,298
and 89,399,012 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and
March 31, 2016, respectively
|
9,242
|
8,940
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
26,681,521
|
25,342,943
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(28,727,774)
|
(28,842,092)
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
(2,037,011)
|
(3,490,209)
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$1,597,067
|
$1,352,305
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-2
NATURALSHRIMP INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
Facility
operations
|
70,930
|
183,662
|
General
and administrative
|
909,182
|
1,413,665
|
Depreciation
|
60,459
|
74,680
|
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
1,040,571
|
1,672,007
|
|
|
|
Operating
(loss) before other income (expense)
|
(1,040,571)
|
(1,672,007)
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
(174,335)
|
(169,700)
|
Other
income
|
-
|
9,530
|
Amortization
of debt discount
|
(295,000)
|
-
|
Financing
costs
|
(164,000)
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
|
11,000
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of warrant liability
|
4,000
|
-
|
Gain
on extinguishment of debt, related party
|
2,339,353
|
-
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
-
|
(319,369)
|
Debt
settlement expense
|
(566,129)
|
-
|
|
|
|
Total
other income (expense)
|
1,154,889
|
(479,539)
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss)
before income taxes
|
114,318
|
(2,151,546)
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
38,868
|
-
|
|
|
|
Benefit
of Net operating loss
|
(38,868)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Net
income/(loss)
|
$114,318
|
$(2,151,546)
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(loss)
per share - Basic
|
$0.00
|
$(0.02)
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(loss)
per share - Diluted
|
$0.00
|
$(0.02)
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - Basic
|
90,025,445
|
88,660,101
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - Diluted
|
90,070,074
|
88,660,101
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-3
NATURALSHRIMP INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Common Stock
|
Additional
|
Stock
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders'
|
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Paid-in
Capital
|
Receivable
|
Deficit
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
March 31, 2015
|
86,777,382
|
$8,678
|
$24,078,062
|
$(25,001)
|
$(26,690,546)
|
$(2,628,807)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of shares for cash
|
2,393,956
|
239
|
836,609
|
25,001
|
|
861,849
|
Issuance
of shares debt repayment
|
199,103
|
20
|
378,276
|
|
|
378,296
|
Issuance
of shares for compensation
|
28,571
|
3
|
49,996
|
|
|
49,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
|
|
(2,151,546)
|
(2,151,546)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2016
|
89,399,012
|
$8,940
|
$25,342,943
|
$-
|
$(28,842,092)
|
$(3,490,209)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of shares for cash
|
28,571
|
3
|
9,997
|
|
|
10,000
|
Issuance
of shares for debt settlement
|
1,225,715
|
123
|
566,006
|
|
|
566,129
|
Issuance
of shares for compensation
|
1,055,000
|
106
|
464,645
|
|
|
464,751
|
Issuance
of shares in connection with debt
|
700,000
|
70
|
297,930
|
|
|
298,000
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
114,318
|
114,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
March 31, 2017
|
92,408,298
|
9,242
|
26,681,521
|
-
|
(28,727,774)
|
(2,037,011)
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-4
NATURALSHRIMP INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
March 31, 2016
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
Net
income/(loss)
|
$114,318
|
$(2,151,546)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
464,750
|
49,999
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
60,459
|
74,680
|
(Gain)/loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
(2,339,353)
|
319,369
|
Debt
settlement expense
|
566,129
|
-
|
Amortization
of debt discount
|
295,000
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
|
(11,000)
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of warrant liability
|
(4,000)
|
-
|
Financing
costs
|
164,000
|
-
|
|
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
-
|
3,203
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(223,000)
|
-
|
Accounts
payable
|
(63,959)
|
387,047
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
162,941
|
5,137
|
Accrued
interest - related parties
|
91,500
|
106,739
|
|
|
|
CASH
USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
(722,215)
|
(1,205,372)
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
Cash
paid for purchase of fixed assets
|
-
|
(35,980)
|
|
|
|
CASH
USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
-
|
(35,980)
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
Proceeds
from bank loan
|
45,000
|
-
|
Payments
on bank loan
|
(2,000)
|
-
|
Payment
of related party notes payable
|
(16,000)
|
(5,798)
|
Borrowing
on debt
|
-
|
50,000
|
Borrowing
on Notes payable - related party
|
657,257
|
134,750
|
Borrowing
on Short-term notes
|
-
|
(12,407)
|
Lines
of credit
|
(40,005)
|
(1,758)
|
Proceeds
from sale of stock post-reverse acquisition
|
10,000
|
861,849
|
Proceeds
from convertible debentures
|
150,000
|
-
|
|
|
|
CASH
PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
804,252
|
1,026,636
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH
|
82,037
|
(214,716)
|
|
|
|
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
6,158
|
220,874
|
|
|
|
CASH AT END OF YEAR
|
$88,195
|
$6,158
|
|
|
|
INTEREST PAID DURING YEAR
|
$72,837
|
$26,384
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
|
|
|
Accrued
interest settled with debt
|
$-
|
$23,927
|
Common
Stock issued for debt settlement
|
$566,129
|
$-
|
Notes
payable - related party settled with stock
|
$-
|
$35,000
|
Repayment
of debt through issuance of bank loan
|
$200,000
|
$35,000
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-5
NATURALSHRIMP INCORPORATED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF THE ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
Nature of the Business
NaturalShrimp
Incorporated (“NaturalShrimp” “the
Company”), a Nevada corporation, is a biotechnology company
and has developed a proprietary technology that enables the Company
to grow Pacific White shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei, formerly
Penaeus vannamei) in an ecologically controlled, high-density,
low-cost environment, and in fully contained and independent
production facilities. The Company’s system uses technology
which allows it to produce a naturally-grown shrimp
“crop” weekly, and accomplishes this without the use of
antibiotics or toxic chemicals. The Company has developed several
proprietary technology assets, including a knowledge base that
allows it to produce commercial quantities of shrimp in a closed
system with a computer monitoring system that automates, monitors
and maintains proper levels of oxygen, salinity and temperature for
optimal shrimp production. The Company’s eco-friendly,
bio-secure design does not rely on ocean water; it recreates the
natural ocean environment allowing for high-density production
which can be replicated anywhere in the world. The Company’s
initial production facility is located outside of San Antonio,
Texas.
The
Company’s primary solution against infectious agents is its
“Vibrio Suppression Technology”. The Company believes
this system creates higher sustainable densities, consistent
production, improved growth and survival rates and improved food
conversion without the use of antibiotics, probiotics or unhealthy
anti-microbial chemicals. Vibrio Suppression Technology helps to
exclude and suppress harmful organisms that usually destroy
“BioFloc” and other enclosed technologies.
The
Company has three wholly-owned subsidiaries including NaturalShrimp
Corporation, NaturalShrimp Global, Inc. and Natural Aquatic
Systems, Inc.
Going Concern
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, assuming the Company will continue as a
going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For
the year ended March 31, 2017, the Company had net income of
$114,318. At March 31, 2017, the Company had an accumulated deficit
of $28,727,774 and a working capital deficit of $2,384,695. These
factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern, within one year from the issuance
date of this filing. The Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern is dependent on its ability to raise the required
additional capital or debt financing to meet short and long-term
operating requirements. During the 2017 fiscal year, the Company
received net cash proceeds of approximately $657,000 from a
borrowing on notes payable - related party, $245,000 in bank
borrowings, and $150,000 from the issuance of convertible debt. The
Company used theproceeds from the bank borrowing to settle
approximately $2,540,000 in notes payable and accrued interest in
default to a related party, resulting in a gain on extinguishment
of debt of approximately $2,340,000. Management believes that
private placements of equity capital and/or additional debt
financing will be needed to fund the Company’s long-term
operating requirements. The Company may also encounter business
endeavors that require significant cash commitments or
unanticipated problems or expenses that could result in a
requirement for additional cash. If the Company raises
additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt
securities, the percentage ownership of their current shareholders
could be reduced, and such securities might have rights,
preferences or privileges senior to our common stock. Additional
financing may not be available upon acceptable terms, or at
all. If adequate funds are not available or are not
available on acceptable terms, the Company may not be able to take
advantage of prospective business endeavors or opportunities, which
could significantly and materially restrict our operations. The
Company continues to pursue external financing alternatives to
improve our working capital position. If the Company is unable to
obtain the necessary capital, the Company may have to cease
operations.
F-6
The
Company plans to improve the growth rate of the shrimp and the
environmental conditions of its production facilities. Management
also plans to acquire a hatchery in which the Company can better
control the environment in which to develop the post larvaes. If
management is unsuccessful in these efforts, discontinuance of
operations is possible. The consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
these uncertainties.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
NaturalShrimp Incorporated and its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
NaturalShrimp Corporation and NaturalShrimp Global. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use of Estimates
Preparing
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of
March 31, 2017, the Company did not have any off-balance sheet
activities (including the use of structured finance or special
purpose entities) or any trading activities in non-exchange traded
commodity contracts that have a current or future effect on our
financial condition, changes in the financial condition, revenues
or expenses, results of operation, liquidity, capital expenditures
or capital resources that are material to our
investors.
Basic and Diluted Earnings/Loss per Common Share
Basic
and diluted earnings or loss per share (“EPS”) amounts
in the consolidated financial statements are computed in accordance
with ASC 260 – 10 “Earnings per Share”, which
establishes the requirements for presenting EPS. Basic EPS is based
on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted EPS is based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalents. Basic EPS
is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common
stockholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Included in the
diluted EPS for the year ended March 31, 2017, the Company had
$150,000 in convertible debentures whose underlying shares are
convertible at the holders’ option at initial fixed
conversion prices ranging from $0.30 to $0.35. The Company did not
have any potentially dilutive common stock equivalents during the
year ended March 31, 2016.
Fair Value Measurements
ASC
Topic 820, “Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures”, requires that certain
financial instruments be recognized at their fair values at our
balance sheet dates. However, other financial instruments, such as
debt obligations, are not required to be recognized at their fair
values, but Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United
States (“GAAP”) provides an option to elect fair value
accounting for these instruments. GAAP requires the disclosure of
the fair values of all financial instruments, regardless of whether
they are recognized at their fair values or carrying amounts in our
balance sheets. For financial instruments recognized at fair value,
GAAP requires the disclosure of their fair values by type of
instrument, along with other information, including changes in the
fair values of certain financial instruments recognized in income
or other comprehensive income. For financial instruments not
recognized at fair value, the disclosure of their fair values is
provided below under “Financial
Instruments.”
F-7
Nonfinancial
assets, such as property, plant and equipment, and nonfinancial
liabilities are recognized at their carrying amounts in the
Company’s balance sheets. GAAP does not permit nonfinancial
assets and liabilities to be remeasured at their fair values.
However, GAAP requires the remeasurement of such assets and
liabilities to their fair values upon the occurrence of certain
events, such as the impairment of property, plant and equipment. In
addition, if such an event occurs, GAAP requires the disclosure of
the fair value of the asset or liability along with other
information, including the gain or loss recognized in income in the
period the remeasurement occurred.
At
March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not have any assets or
liabilities that would be required to be measured under ASC Topic
820.
Financial Instruments
The
Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash
equivalents, receivables, payables, and debt and are accounted for
under the provisions of ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”. The
carrying amount of these financial instruments, with the exception
of discounted debt, as reflected in the consolidated balance sheets
approximates fair value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For the
purpose of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company
considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity
of three months or less to be cash equivalents. There were no cash
equivalents at March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Inventories
Shrimp
inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out
method) or market. Purchased shrimp (Post Larvae or
“PL”) are carried at purchase costs plus costs of
maintenance through the balance sheet dates. Inventories were not
material at March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Fixed Assets
Equipment
is carried at historical value or cost and is depreciated over the
estimated useful lives of the related assets. Depreciation on
buildings is computed using the straight-line method, while
depreciation on all other fixed assets is computed using the
Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) method, which
does not materially differ from GAAP. Estimated useful lives are as
follows:
Autos
and Trucks
|
5
years
|
Buildings
|
27.5
– 39 years
|
Other
Depreciable Property
|
5
– 10 years
|
Furniture
and Fixtures
|
3
– 10 years
|
Maintenance
and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. At the time of
retirement or other disposition of equipment, the cost and
accumulated depreciation will be removed from the accounts and the
resulting gain or loss, if any, will be reflected in
operations.
The
consolidated statements of operations reflect depreciation expense
of approximately $60,000 and $75,000 for the years ended March 31,
2017 and 2016, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues
for products sold are recorded upon delivery of the products to
customers, which is the point at which title to the products is
transferred, and when payment has either been received or
collection is reasonably assured. The Company has no warranty or
return policy as all sales are final. The Company extends unsecured
credit to its customers for amounts invoiced.
F-8
Bad Debts
Uncollectible
accounts receivable are written off at the time amounts are
determined to be a loss to the Company. An allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable is maintained as necessary, based upon specific
accounts receivable outstanding determined to be uncollectible and
the appropriate charge is made to operations. As of March 31, 2017
and 2016, no allowance for doubtful accounts was deemed
necessary.
Shipping and Handling
The
Company reports shipping and handling charges to customers as part
of sales and the associated expense as part of cost of
sales.
Income Taxes
Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences
between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and
liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in
the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the
periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable
income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to
reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period
plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets
and liabilities.
In
addition, the Company’s management performs an evaluation of
all uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken in
the course of preparing the Company’s income tax returns to
determine whether the income tax positions meet a “more
likely than not” standard of being sustained under
examination by the applicable taxing authorities. This
evaluation is required to be performed for all open tax years, as
defined by the various statutes of limitations, for federal and
state purposes.
Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation to employees in
accordance with ASC 718. “Stock-based Compensation to
Employees” is measured at the grant date, based on the
fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the
requisite employee service period. The Company accounts for
stock-based compensation to other than employees in accordance with
ASC 505-50 “Equity
Instruments Issued to Other than Employees” and are
valued at the earlier of a commitment date or upon completion of
the services, based on the fair value of the equity instruments and
is recognized as expense over the service period. The Company
estimates the fair value of stock-based payments using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model for common stock options and
warrants and the closing price of the Company’s common stock
for common share issuances. Once the stock is issued the
appropriate expense account is charged.
Impairment of LongLived Assets and LongLived
Assets
The
Company will periodically evaluate the carrying value of
longlived assets to be held and used when events and
circumstances warrant such a review and at least annually. The
carrying value of a longlived asset is considered impaired
when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow from such asset is
separately identifiable and is less than its carrying value. In
that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the
carrying value exceeds the fair value of the longlived asset.
Fair value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows
discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on
longlived assets to be disposed of are determined in a
similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for the cost to
dispose.
F-9
Commitments and Contingencies
Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated
financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the
Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future
events occur or fail to occur. The Company’s management
and its legal counsel assess such contingent liabilities, and such
assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In
assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are
pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in
such proceedings, the Company’s legal counsel evaluates the
perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as
well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or
expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable
that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the
liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be
accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial
statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially
material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably
possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature
of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range
of possible loss if determinable and material, would be
disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed
unless they involve guarantees, in which case the nature of the
guarantee would be disclosed.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts
with Customers,” which requires an entity to recognize the
amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the
transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09
will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S.
GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for
annual reporting periods for public business entities beginning
after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that
reporting period. The new standard permits the use of either the
retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company
is currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on
its financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has
not yet selected a transition method nor determined the effect of
the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.
2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) The standard requires all leases
that have a term of over 12 months to be recognized on the balance
sheet with the liability for lease payments and the corresponding
right-of-use asset initially measured at the present value of
amounts expected to be paid over the term. Recognition of the costs
of these leases on the income statement will be dependent upon
their classification as either an operating or a financing lease.
Costs of an operating lease will continue to be recognized as a
single operating expense on a straight-line basis over the lease
term. Costs for a financing lease will be disaggregated and
recognized as both an operating expense (for the amortization of
the right-of-use asset) and interest expense (for interest on the
lease liability). This standard will be effective for our interim
and annual periods beginning January 1, 2019, and must be applied
on a modified retrospective basis to leases existing at, or entered
into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period
presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted.
We are currently evaluating the timing of adoption and the
potential impact of this standard on our financial position, but we
do not expect it to have a material impact on our results of
operations.
During
the year ended March 31, 2017, there were several new accounting
pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
Each of these pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be
adopted by the Company. Management does not believe the adoption of
any of these accounting pronouncements has had or will have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Management’s Evaluation of Subsequent Events
The Company evaluates events that have occurred after the balance
sheet date of March 31, 2017, through the date which the
consolidated financial statements were issued. Based upon the
review, other than described in Note 12 – Subsequent Events,
the Company did not identify any recognized or non-recognized
subsequent events that would have required adjustment or disclosure
in the consolidated financial statements.
F-10
NOTE 3 – SHORT-TERM NOTE AND LINES OF CREDIT
On
November 3, 2015, the Company entered into a short-term note
agreement with Community National Bank for a total value of
$50,000. The short-term note has a stated interest rate of 5.25%,
maturity date of December 15, 2017 and had an initial interest only
payment on February 3, 2016. The short-term note is guaranteed by
an officer and director. The balance of the line of credit at March
31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 was $25,298 and $50,000,
respectively.
The
Company has a working capital line of credit with Community
National Bank. On August 28, 2013, the Company renewed the line of
credit for $30,000. The line of credit bears an interest rate of
7.3% and is payable quarterly. The line of credit matured on
February 28, 2014 and was renewed by the Company with a maturity
date of June 10, 2017. It is secured by various assets of the
Company’s subsidiaries, and is guaranteed by two directors of
the Company. The balance of the line of credit at March 31, 2017
and March 31, 2016 was zero and $14,129, respectively.
The
Company also has a working capital line of credit with Extraco
Bank. On April 30, 2017, the Company renewed the line of credit for
$475,000. The line of credit bears an interest rate of 5.0% that is
compounded monthly on unpaid balances and is payable monthly. The
line of credit matures on April 30, 2018, and is secured by
certificates of deposit and letters of credit owned by directors
and shareholders of the Company. The balance of the line of credit
is $473,029 at both March 31, 2017, included in non-current
liabilities, and March 31, 2016.
The
Company also has additional lines of credit with Extraco Bank for
$100,000 and $200,000, which were renewed on January 19, 2017 and
April 30, 2017, respectively, with maturity dates of January 19,
2018 and April 30, 2018, respectively. The $200,000 line of
credit is included in non-current liabilities as of March 31, 2017,
with an outstanding balance of $178,470. The lines of credit
bear an interest rate of 4.5% (increased to 6.5% and 5%,
respectively, upon renewal in 2017) that is compounded monthly on
unpaid balances and is payable monthly. They are secured by
certificates of deposit and letters of credit owned by directors
and shareholders of the Company. The balance of the lines of
credit was $278,470 at both March 31, 2017 and March 31,
2016.
The
Company also has a working capital line of credit with Capital One
Bank for $50,000. The line of credit bears an interest rate of
prime plus 25.9 basis points, which totaled 29.9% as of March 31,
2017. The line of credit is unsecured. The balance of the line of
credit was $9,580 at both March 31, 2017 and March 31,
2016.
The
Company also has a working capital line of credit with Chase Bank
for $25,000. The line of credit bears an interest rate of prime
plus 10 basis points, which totaled 14% as of March 31, 2017. The
line of credit is secured by assets of the Company’s
subsidiaries. The balance of the line of credit is $11,197 and
$12,261 at March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016,
respectively.
NOTE 4 – BANK LOAN
On
January 10, 2017, the Company entered
into a promissory note with Community National Bank for $245,000,
at an annual interest rate of 5% and a maturity date of January 10,
2020 (the “CNB Note”). The CNB Note is secured by
certain real property owned by the Company in LaCoste, Texas, and
is also personally guaranteed by the Company’s President, as
well as certain shareholders of the Company. As consideration for
the guarantee, the Company issued 600,000 of its common stock to
the shareholders, which was recognized as debt issuance costs with
a fair value of $264,000, based on the market value of the
Company’s common stock of $0.44 on the date of issuance. As
the fair value of the debt issuance costs exceeded the face amount
of the promissory note, the excess of the fair value was recognized
as financing costs in the statement of operations. The resulting
debt discount is to be amortized over the term of the CNB Note
under the effective interest method. As the debt discount is in
excess of the face amount of the promissory note, the effective
interest rate is not determinable, and as such, all of the discount
was immediately expensed.
F-11
Maturities on Bank loan is as follows:
Years
ending:
|
|
March 31,
2018
|
$7,310
|
March 31,
2019
|
7,690
|
March 31,
2020
|
228,000
|
|
$243,000
|
NOTE 5 – CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
January Debentures
On
January 23, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement (“January SPA”) for the sale of a convertible
debenture (“January debenture”) with an original
principal amount of $262,500, for consideration of $250,000, with a
prorated five percent original issue discount (“OID”).
The debenture has a one-time interest charge of twelve percent
applied on the issuance date and due on the maturity date, which is
two years from the date of each payment of consideration. The
January SPA included a warrant to purchase 350,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock. The warrants have a five year term
and vest such that the buyer shall receive 1.4 warrants for every
dollar funded to the Company under the January debenture. The
Company received $50,000 at closing, with additional consideration
to be paid at the holder’s option. Upon the closing the buyer
was granted a warrant to purchase 70,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock.
The
January debentures are convertible at an original conversion price
of $0.35, subject to adjustment if the Company’s common stock
trades at a price lower than $0.60 per share during the forty-five
day period immediately preceding August 15, 2017, in which case the
conversion price is reset to sixty percent of the lowest trade
occurring during the twenty-five days prior to the conversion date.
Additionally, the conversion price, as well as other terms
including interest rates, original issue discounts, warrant
coverage, adjusts if any future financings have more favorable
terms. The January debenture also has piggyback registration
rights.
The
conversion feature of the January debenture meets the definition of
a derivative and due to the adjustment to the conversion price to
occur upon subsequent sales of securities at a price lower than the
original conversion price, requires bifurcation and is accounted
for as a derivative liability. The derivative was initially
recognized at an estimated fair value of $85,000 and created a
discount on the January debentures that will be amortized over the
life of the debentures using the effective interest rate method.
The fair value of the embedded derivative is measured and
recognized at fair value each subsequent reporting period and the
changes in fair value are recognized in the Consolidated Statement
of Operations as a change in fair value of derivative
liability.
The
Company estimated the fair value of the conversion feature
derivatives embedded in the convertible debentures based on
weighted probabilities of assumptions used in the Black Scholes
pricing model. The key valuation assumptions used consist, in part,
of the price of the Company’s common stock of $0.46 at
issuance date; a risk free interest rate of 1.16% and expected
volatility of the Company’s common stock, of 384.75%, and the
various estimated reset exercise prices weighted by probability.
This resulted in the calculated fair value of the debt discount
being greater than the face amount of the debt, and the excess
amount of $35,000 was immediately expensed as Financing costs. As
the discount was in excess of the face amount of the debenture, the
effective interest rate is not determinable, and as such, all of
the discount was immediately expensed.
The
derivative was remeasured as of March 31, 2017, resulting in an
estimated fair value of $74,000, for a decrease in fair value of
$11,000. The key valuation assumptions used consist, in part, of
the price of the Company’s common stock of $0.40; a risk free
interest rate of 1.16% and expected volatility of the
Company’s common stock, of 388.06%, and the various estimated
reset exercise prices weighted by probability.
F-12
The
warrants have an original exercise price of $0.60, which adjusts
for any future dilutive issuances. As a result of the dilutive
issuance adjustment provision, the warrants have been classified
out of equity as a warrant liability. The Company estimated the
fair value of the warrant liability using the Black Scholes pricing
model. The key valuation assumptions used consist, in part, of the
price of the Company’s common stock of $0.46 at issuance
date; a risk free interest rate of 1.88% and expected volatility of
the Company’s common stock, of 309.96%, resulting in a fair
value of $32,000. As noted above, the calculated fair value of the
discount is greater than the face amount of the debt, and
therefore, the excess amount of $32,000 was immediately expensed as
Financing costs. The warrant liability was remeasured as of March
31, 2017, resulting in an estimated fair value of $28,000, for a
decrease in fair value of $4,000. The key valuation assumptions
used consists, in part, of the price of the Company’s common
stock of $0.40; a risk free interest rate of 1.88% and expected
volatility of the Company’s common stock, of
292.42%.
March Debentures
On
March 28, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement (“SPA”) for the purchase of up to $400,000 in
convertible debentures (“March debentures”), due 3
years from issuance. The SPA consists of three separate convertible
debentures, the first purchase which occurred at the signing
closing date on March 28, 2017, for $100,000 with a purchase price
of $90,000 (an OID of $10,000). The second closing is to occur by
mutual agreement of the buyer and Company, at any time sixty to
ninety days following the signing closing date, for $150,0000 with
a purchase price of $135,000 (an OID of $15,000). The third closing
is to occur sixty to ninety days after the second closing for
$150,000 with a purchase price of $135,000 (an OID of $15,000). The
SPA also includes a commitment fee to include 100,000 restricted
shares of common stock of the Company upon the signing closing
date. The commitment shares fair value was calculated as $34,000,
based on the market value of the common shares at the closing date
of $0.34, and was recognized as a debt discount. The conversion
price is fixed at $0.30 for the first 180 days. After 180 days, or
in the event of a default, the conversion price becomes the lower
of $0.30 or 60% (or 55% based on certain conditions) of the lowest
closing bid price for the past 20 days.
The
conversion feature of the March debenture meets the definition of a
derivative as it would not be classified as equity were it a
stand-alone instrument, and therefore requires bifurcation and is
accounted for as a derivative liability. The derivative was
initially recognized at an estimated fair value of $170,000 and
created a discount on the March debentures that will be amortized
over the life of the debentures using the effective interest rate
method. The fair value of the embedded derivative is measured and
recognized at fair value each subsequent reporting period and the
changes in fair value are recognized in the Consolidated Statement
of Operations as Change in fair value of derivative
liability.
The
Company estimated the fair value of the conversion feature
derivatives embedded in the convertible debentures based on
weighted probabilities of assumptions used in the Black Scholes
pricing model. The key valuation assumptions used consist, in part,
of the price of the Company’s common stock of $0.40 at
issuance date; a risk free interest rate of 1.56% and expected
volatility of the Company’s common stock, of 333.75%, and the
various estimated reset exercise prices weighted by probability.
This resulted in the calculated fair value of the debt discount
being greater than the face amount of the debt, and the excess
amount of $104,000, including the commitment fees, was immediately
expensed as financing costs.
The
debenture is also redeemable at the option of the Company, at
amounts ranging from 105% to 140% of the principal and accrued
interest balance, based on the redemption date’s passage of
time ranging from 90 days to 180 days from the date of issuance of
each debenture.
NOTE 6 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Common Stock
On
August 1, 2016, the Company reached an agreement with a
professional advisor in which the Company issued 55,000 shares of
common stock with a fair value of $24,750. This amount was
recognized as stock compensation cost for the period ended December
31, 2016.
F-13
On
October 10, 2016, the Company entered into a form of Subscription
Agreement for $0.35 per common share and issued 28,571 common
shares for $10,000 in cash proceeds.
On
January 10, 2017, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares to a
consultant for services to be rendered over six months. The fair
value of the shares of $440,000, based on the market value of the
common stock on the date of issuance, will be recognized over the
term of the agreement. $220,000 was expensed in the year ending
March 31, 2017, with $220,000 included in prepaid assets as of
March 31, 2017.
The
Company issued 1,225,715 shares to two unrelated parties on January
23, 2017, in exchange for the settlement of debt owed by
NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc., a related party (Note 8), previous to
the Company’s January 2015 reverse acquisition. At the time
of the acquisition the Company was not made aware of the debt and
therefore did not assume the liability in the purchase agreement.
When the Company was presented with the debt during the fiscal year
ending March 31, 2017, the Company agreed to assume and settle this
debt by the issuance of common shares. The fair value of the shares
issued, based on the market value of the common shares on the date
of the settlement agreement, was $566,129.
During
the year ended March 31, 2016, the Company reached an agreement
with certain vendors in which the Company issued 199,103 shares of
common stock in full payment of debt of $35,000, accrued interest
of $23,927 and recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of
$319,369.
On
August 7, 2015, the Company reached an agreement with a
professional advisor in which the Company issued 28,571 shares of
common stock with a fair value of $49,999. This amount was recorded
as stock compensation cost for the year ended March 31,
2016.
Between
May 7, 2015 and January 5, 2016, NaturalShrimp Incorporated entered
into a form of Subscription Agreement (the “Agreement”)
and consummated initial closings of a private placement offering of
the Company’s common stock (the “Offering”). As
of March 31, 2016 an aggregate of 2,393,956 shares of common stock
had been sold to investors pursuant to the Agreement at a price of
$0.35 per share.
NOTE 7 – OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
The
Company has not granted any options since inception. There was a
grant of warrants on January 31, 2017 in connection with
convertible debentures. For further discussion see Note
5.
NOTE 8 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Notes Payable – Related Parties
On
January 20, 2017 and on March 14, 2017, the Company entered into
convertible debentures with an affiliate of the Company whose
managing member is the Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, and a
director of the Company. The convertible debentures are each in the
amount of $20,000, mature one year from date of issuance, and bear
interest at 6%. Upon an event of default, as defined in the
debenture, the principal and any accrued interest becomes
immediately due, and the interest rate increases to 24%. The
convertible debentures are convertible at the holder’s option
at a conversion price of $0.30.
NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc.
On
January 1, 2016 the Company entered into a notes payable agreement
with NaturalShrimp Holdings, Inc.(“NSH”), a
shareholder. Between January 16, 2016 and March 7, 2016 the Company
borrowed $134,750 under this agreement. An additional $601,361 was
borrowed under this agreement in the year ended March 31, 2017. The
note payable has no set monthly payment or maturity date with a
stated interest rate of 2%.
F-14
Baptist Community Services (BCS)
Pursuant
to an assignment agreement dated March 26, 2009, Amarillo National
Bank sold and transferred a note to Baptist Community Services
(BCS), a shareholder of NSH, in the amount of
$2,004,820. The interest rate under the terms of the
agreement is 2.25% and is payable monthly. The note is
collateralized by all inventories, accounts, equipment, and all
general intangibles related to the Company’s shrimp
production facility in La Coste, Texas. Payment of the note is also
guaranteed by High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation, a
shareholder of NSH. The balance of the note at March 31, 2016 was
$2,004,820 and was classified as a current liability on the
consolidated balance sheets.
Effective
December 31, 2008, the Company entered into a subordinated
promissory note agreement with BCS for $70,000 (BCS subordinated
note) to provide working capital to pay accrued interest due under
the BCS note and other operating expenses. On April 7, 2009, the
BCS subordinated note was increased to $125,000 to provide
additional working capital for the Company. The balance of the BCS
subordinated note at March 31, 2016 was $301,133 and was classified
as a current liability on the consolidated balance
sheets.
On
January 25, 2010, the Company received notice from BCS notifying it
that the Company was in default of its obligations to BCS and that
both the BCS note and the BCS subordinated note, as well as all
accrued interest, fees and expenses, were payable in full. Pursuant
to a forbearance agreement dated January 25, 2010, BCS agreed to
forbear from exercising any remedies available under the notes
until January 25, 2011 or when the Company fails to promptly
perform any of its covenants or obligation under the forbearance
agreement, whichever occurs first. In 2015, a fifth
forbearance agreement was executed extending the forbearance terms
to December 31, 2016.
On January 10, 2017, the Company agreed to pay to BCS $200,000 of
the proceeds from the CNB Note (Note 4), in satisfaction of the outstanding amounts due on the
BCS and BCS subordinated notes payable of $2,305,953, plus accrued
interest of $233,398, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt
of $2,339,353.
Shareholder Notes
The
Company has entered into several working capital notes payable to
multiple shareholders of NSH and Bill Williams, an officer, a
director, and a shareholder of the Company, for a total of
$486,500. These notes had stock issued in lieu of
interest and have no set monthly payment or maturity date. The
balance of these notes at March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $426,404 and
$426,404, respectively, and is classified as a current liability on
the consolidated balance sheets. At March 31, 2017 and 2016,
accrued interest payable was $172,808 and $142,296,
respectively.
Shareholders
In
2009, the Company entered into a note payable to Randall Steele, a
shareholder of NSH, for $50,000. The note bears interest at 6.0%
and was payable upon maturity on January 20, 2011. In addition, the
Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for consideration.
The shares were valued at the date of issuance at fair market
value. The value assigned to the shares of $50,000 was recorded as
increase in common stock and additional paid-in capital and was
limited to the value of the note. The assignment of a value to the
shares resulted in a financing fee being recorded for the same
amount. The note is unsecured. The balance of the note at March 31,
2017 and 2016 was $50,000, respectively, and is classified as a
current liability on the consolidated balance sheets. Interest
expense on the note was $3,000 and $3,000 during the years ended
March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At March 31, 2017 and 2016,
accrued interest payable was $2,283 and $1,543,
respectively.
Beginning
in 2010, the Company started entering into several working capital
notes payable with various shareholders of NSH for a total of
$290,000 and bearing interest at 8%. The balance of these notes at
March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $5,000, and is classified as a current
liability on the consolidated balance sheets. At March 31, 2017 and
2016, accrued interest payable was $1,200 and $800,
respectively.
Beginning
in 2009, the Company enter into notes payable with various
shareholders of NSH. The notes bear interest at 15.0% and are
payable generally twelve months from the date of the note. The
notes are collateralized by the shrimp crop attributable to the
post larvaes (PLs) acquired from the note proceeds. On May 28, 2015
the Company reached an agreement with these various shareholders in
which the Company issued 199,103 shares of common stock in full
payment of debt of $35,000, accrued interest of $23,927 and
recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $319,369.
F-15
NOTE 9 – FEDERAL INCOME TAX
The
Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740-10, which provides
for an asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes.
Under this approach, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized based on anticipated future tax consequences, using
currently enacted tax laws, attributed to temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts calculated for income
tax purposes.
The
components of income tax expense for the years ended March 31, 2017
and 2016 consist of the following:
|
2017
|
2016
|
Federal Tax
statutory rate
|
34.00%
|
34.00%
|
Permanent
differences
|
559.25%
|
0.00%
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(525.25)%
|
(34.00)%
|
Effective
rate
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
Significant
components of the Company's estimated deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of March 31, 2017 and 2016 are as
follows:
|
2017
|
2016
|
Deferred tax
assets:
|
|
|
Net operating loss
carryforwards
|
$570,000
|
$899,000
|
Deferred tax
benefit
|
350,000
|
180,000
|
Total deferred tax
asset
|
920,000
|
1,079,000
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(920,000)
|
(1,079,000)
|
|
$-
|
$-
|
As of
March 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $1,671,000 of federal
net operating loss carry forwards. These carry forwards, if not
used, will begin to expire in 2028. Future utilization of the net
operating loss carry forwards is subject to certain limitations
under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company
believes that the issuance of its common stock in exchange for
Multiplayer Online Dragon, Inc. January 30, 2015 resulted in an
“ownership change” under the rules and regulations of
Section 382. Accordingly, our ability to utilize our net operating
losses generated prior to this date is limited to approximately
$282,000 annually.
To the
extent that the tax deduction is included in a net operating loss
carry forward and is in excess of amounts recognized for book
purposes, no benefit will be recognized until the loss carry
forward is recognized. Upon utilization and realization of the
carry forward, the corresponding change in the deferred asset and
valuation allowance will be recorded as additional paid-in
capital.
The
Company provides for a valuation allowance when it is more likely
than not that it will not realize a portion of the deferred tax
assets. The Company has established a valuation allowance against
the net deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty that enough
taxable income will be generated in those taxing jurisdictions to
utilize the assets. Therefore, we have not reflected any benefit of
such deferred tax assets in the accompanying financial statements.
Our net deferred tax asset and valuation allowance decreased by
$159,000 in the year ended March 31, 2017.
The
Company reviewed all income tax positions taken or that we expect
to be taken for all open years and determined that our income tax
positions are appropriately stated and supported for all open
years. The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax
examinations by tax authorities for years after 2012 due to
unexpired net operating loss carryforwards originating in and
subsequent to that year. The Company may be subject to income tax
examinations for the various taxing authorities which vary by
jurisdiction.
NOTE 10 – CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
The
Company maintains cash balances at one financial institution.
Accounts at this institution are insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $250,000. As of March 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company’s cash balance did not exceed FDIC
coverage.
F-16
NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Executive Employment Agreements – Bill Williams and Gerald
Easterling
On
April 1, 2015, the Company entered into employment agreements with
each of Bill G. Williams, as the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, and Gerald Easterling as the Company’s President,
effective as of April 1, 2015 (the “Employment
Agreements”).
The
Employment Agreements are each terminable at will and each provide
for a base annual salary of $96,000. In addition, the Employment
Agreements each provide that the employee is entitled, at the sole
and absolute discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors,
to receive performance bonuses. Each employee will also be entitled
to certain benefits including health insurance and monthly
allowances for cell phone and automobile expenses.
Each
Employment Agreement provides that in the event employee is
terminated without cause or resigns for good reason (each as
defined in their Employment Agreements), the employee will receive,
as severance the employee’s base salary for a period of 60
months following the date of termination. In the event of a change
of control of the Company, the employee may elect to terminate the
Employment Agreement within 30 days thereafter and upon such
termination would receive a lump sum payment equal to 500% of the
employee’s base salary.
Each
Employment Agreement contains certain restrictive covenants
relating to non-competition, non-solicitation of customers and
non-solicitation of employees for a period of one year following
termination of the employee’s Employment
Agreement.
NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On
April 20, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible debenture
with an affiliate of the Company whose managing member is the
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, and a director of the Company,
for $140,000. The convertible debenture matures one year from date
of issuance, and bears interest at 6%. Upon an event of default, as
defined in the debenture, the principal and any accrued interest
becomes immediately due, and the interest rate increases to 24%.
The convertible debenture is convertible at the holder’s
option at a conversion price of $0.30.
On May
2, 2017, the Company sold 100,000 shares of its common stock at
$0.25 per share, for a total financing of $25,000.
F-17