NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-12138
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts |
|
04-2619298 |
39 Brighton Avenue, Allston, Massachusetts |
|
02134 |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (617) 783-0039
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Depositary Receipts |
|
NYSE AMEX |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class A
Limited Partnership Units
(Title of class)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o (the Registrant is not yet required to submit Interactive Data)Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company x |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of September 30, 2010, there were 105,188 of the registrants Class A units (1,051,876 Depositary Receipts) of limited partnership issued and outstanding and 24,982 Class B units issued and outstanding.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, statements of income, changes in partners capital, and cash flows and related notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, which are in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation for the interim periods.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
The aforementioned financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the aforementioned financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the financial statements and notes thereto included in New England Realty Associates L.P.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
The results of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Audited) |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental Properties |
|
$ |
93,339,779 |
|
$ |
95,971,937 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
4,814,195 |
|
2,879,663 |
|
||
Rents Receivable |
|
698,505 |
|
1,038,820 |
|
||
Real Estate Tax Escrows |
|
254,758 |
|
311,582 |
|
||
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets |
|
3,474,079 |
|
2,857,288 |
|
||
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
|
21,084,527 |
|
24,964,453 |
|
||
Financing and Leasing Fees |
|
977,690 |
|
1,065,993 |
|
||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
124,643,533 |
|
$ |
129,089,736 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note Payable |
|
$ |
7,168,600 |
|
$ |
7,168,600 |
|
Mortgage Notes Payable |
|
137,903,103 |
|
137,641,354 |
|
||
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses |
|
2,235,510 |
|
2,195,245 |
|
||
Advance Rental Payments and Security Deposits |
|
3,356,160 |
|
3,417,361 |
|
||
Total Liabilities |
|
150,663,373 |
|
150,422,560 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 3 and 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Partners Capital 131,484 and 132,346 units outstanding in 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
(26,019,840 |
) |
(21,332,824 |
) |
||
Total Liabilities and Partners Capital |
|
$ |
124,643,533 |
|
$ |
129,089,736 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Rental income |
|
$ |
8,119,956 |
|
$ |
8,089,673 |
|
$ |
24,432,776 |
|
$ |
24,634,345 |
|
Laundry and sundry income |
|
106,772 |
|
119,893 |
|
342,698 |
|
312,263 |
|
||||
|
|
8,226,728 |
|
8,209,566 |
|
24,775,474 |
|
24,946,608 |
|
||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Administrative |
|
409,134 |
|
416,398 |
|
1,331,734 |
|
1,277,745 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
1,493,664 |
|
1,591,668 |
|
4,290,983 |
|
4,513,165 |
|
||||
Management fees |
|
342,010 |
|
334,745 |
|
1,022,230 |
|
1,011,531 |
|
||||
Operating |
|
795,912 |
|
689,871 |
|
2,902,157 |
|
3,064,201 |
|
||||
Renting |
|
209,277 |
|
262,234 |
|
384,273 |
|
406,363 |
|
||||
Repairs and maintenance |
|
1,504,045 |
|
1,435,264 |
|
3,756,649 |
|
3,580,895 |
|
||||
Taxes and insurance |
|
1,039,924 |
|
891,239 |
|
3,159,361 |
|
2,773,745 |
|
||||
|
|
5,793,966 |
|
5,621,419 |
|
16,847,387 |
|
16,627,645 |
|
||||
Income Before Other Income and Discontinued Operations |
|
2,432,762 |
|
2,588,147 |
|
7,928,087 |
|
8,318,963 |
|
||||
Other Income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest income |
|
1,898 |
|
15,270 |
|
4,411 |
|
47,861 |
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
(2,064,796 |
) |
(1,978,591 |
) |
(6,141,468 |
) |
(5,885,831 |
) |
||||
Gain(Loss) on the sale of equipment |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(2,726 |
) |
||||
(Loss) from investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
(1,151,355 |
) |
(325,614 |
) |
(3,169,926 |
) |
(880,902 |
) |
||||
|
|
(3,214,253 |
) |
(2,288,842 |
) |
(9,306,983 |
) |
(6,721,598 |
) |
||||
Net Income (loss) |
|
$ |
(781,491 |
) |
$ |
299,305 |
|
$ |
(1,378,896 |
) |
$ |
1,597,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net Income per Unit |
|
$ |
(5.94 |
) |
$ |
2.26 |
|
$ |
(10.46 |
) |
$ |
11.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding |
|
131,485 |
|
132,556 |
|
131,767 |
|
133,175 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
|
|
Unit |
|
Partners Capital |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Limited |
|
General |
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
Limited |
|
General |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Class A |
|
Class B |
|
Partnership |
|
Subtotal |
|
Units |
|
Total |
|
Class A |
|
Class B |
|
Partnership |
|
Total |
|
||||
Balance, January 1, 2009 |
|
144,180 |
|
34,243 |
|
1,802 |
|
180,225 |
|
44,974 |
|
135,251 |
|
$ |
(14,173,745 |
) |
$ |
(3,366,265 |
) |
$ |
(177,172 |
) |
$ |
(17,717,182 |
) |
Distribution to Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,229,931 |
) |
(529,609 |
) |
(27,874 |
) |
(2,787,414 |
) |
||||
Stock Buyback |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
(2,905 |
) |
(1,214,734 |
) |
(284,626 |
) |
(14,980 |
) |
(1,514,340 |
) |
||||
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,277,892 |
|
303,499 |
|
15,974 |
|
1,597,365 |
|
||||
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
|
144,180 |
|
34,243 |
|
1,802 |
|
180,225 |
|
47,879 |
|
132,346 |
|
$ |
(16,340,518 |
) |
$ |
(3,877,001 |
) |
$ |
(204,052 |
) |
$ |
(20,421,571 |
) |
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
|
144,180 |
|
34,243 |
|
1,802 |
|
180,225 |
|
47,879 |
|
132,346 |
|
$ |
(17,069,520 |
) |
$ |
(4,050,138 |
) |
$ |
(213,165 |
) |
$ |
(21,332,823 |
) |
Distribution to Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,213,767 |
) |
(525,770 |
) |
(27,672 |
) |
(2,767,209 |
) |
||||
Stock Buyback |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862 |
|
(862 |
) |
(432,920 |
) |
(102,591 |
) |
(5,400 |
) |
(540,911 |
) |
||||
Net (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,103,118 |
) |
(261,990 |
) |
(13,789 |
) |
(1,378,897 |
) |
||||
Balance, September 30, 2010 |
|
144,180 |
|
34,243 |
|
1,802 |
|
180,225 |
|
48,741 |
|
131,484 |
|
$ |
(20,819,325 |
) |
$ |
(4,940,489 |
) |
$ |
(260,026 |
) |
$ |
(26,019,840 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,378,896 |
) |
$ |
1,597,365 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
4,290,983 |
|
4,513,165 |
|
||
Loss from investment in joint ventures |
|
3,169,926 |
|
880,902 |
|
||
Gain (loss) on the sale of equipment |
|
|
|
2,726 |
|
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
(Increase) decrease in rents receivable |
|
340,315 |
|
(149,645 |
) |
||
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expense |
|
40,265 |
|
(159,481 |
) |
||
Decrease in real estate tax escrow |
|
56,824 |
|
2,676 |
|
||
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
(616,791 |
) |
238,682 |
|
||
(Decrease) in advance rental payments and security deposits |
|
(61,201 |
) |
(306 |
) |
||
Total Adjustments |
|
7,220,321 |
|
5,328,719 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
5,841,425 |
|
6,926,084 |
|
||
Cash Flows provided by (used in) Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net proceeds from the sale of equipment |
|
|
|
13,733 |
|
||
Investment in consolidated joint venture |
|
(40,000 |
) |
|
|
||
Deposit on future acquisition |
|
|
|
(2,660,500 |
) |
||
Proceeds from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
750,000 |
|
282,500 |
|
||
Purchase and improvement of rental properties |
|
(1,563,380 |
) |
(2,346,364 |
) |
||
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
|
(853,380 |
) |
(4,710,631 |
) |
||
Cash Flows provided by (used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Payment of financing costs |
|
(7,143 |
) |
(18,687 |
) |
||
Principal payments of mortgage notes payable |
|
(642,372 |
) |
(612,528 |
) |
||
Stock buyback |
|
(540,911 |
) |
(1,514,340 |
) |
||
Proceeds of mortgage notes payable |
|
904,122 |
|
|
|
||
Distributions to partners |
|
(2,767,209 |
) |
(2,787,414 |
) |
||
Net cash (used in) financing activities |
|
(3,053,513 |
) |
(4,932,969 |
) |
||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
1,934,532 |
|
(2,717,516 |
) |
||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, at beginning of period |
|
2,879,663 |
|
10,752,931 |
|
||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, at end of period |
|
$ |
4,814,195 |
|
$ |
8,035,415 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Line of Business: New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NERA or the Partnership) was organized in Massachusetts in 1977. NERA and its subsidiaries own and operate various residential apartment buildings, condominium units and commercial properties located in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. NERA has also made investments in other real estate partnerships and has participated in other real estate related activities, primarily located in Massachusetts.
Accounting Standards: On July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, also known as FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 105-10), General Accepted Accounting Principles (ASC 105-10). ASC 105-10 established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non -grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. Following the Codification, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification. GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the FASBs Codification project, but it will change the way the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Partnership has implemented the Codification in this report by providing references to the Codification topics, as appropriate.
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NERA and its subsidiaries. NERA has a 99.67% to 100% ownership interest in each subsidiary except for the nine limited liability companies (the Investment Properties or Joint Ventures) in which the Partnership has a 40 - 50% ownership interest. The consolidated group is referred to as the Partnerships. Minority interests are not recorded, since they are insignificant. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Partnership accounts for its investment in the above-mentioned Investment Properties using the equity method of consolidation. (See Note 14: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures).
The Partnership accounts for its investments in joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, and subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions. The authoritative guidance on consolidation provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (variable interest entities or VIEs) and the determination of which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIE (the primary beneficiary). Generally, the consideration of whether an entity is a VIE applies when either (1) the equity investors (if any) lack one or more of the essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest, (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entitys activities without additional subordinated financial support or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.
On January 1, 2010, the Partnership adopted the updated provisions of ASC 810, pursuant to FASB No. 167, which amends FIN 46® to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity. Additionally, FASB No. 167 amends FIN 46® to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, which was based on determining which enterprise absorbs the majority of the entitys expected losses, receives a majority of the entitys expected residual returns, or both. FASB No. 167 amends certain guidance in Interpretation 46® for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. Also, FASB No. 167 amends FIN 46® to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprises involvement in a variable interest entity. The enhanced disclosures are required for any enterprise that holds a variable interest in a variable interest entity. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to these financial statements.
Impairment: On an annual basis management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Partnerships rental properties or investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries may be impaired. A propertys value is impaired only if managements estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property. The Partnerships estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter managements assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved. The Partnership has not recognized an impairment loss since 1995.
Accounting Estimates: The preparation of the financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United State of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition: Rental income from residential and commercial properties is recognized over the term of the related lease. For residential tenants, amounts 60 days in arrears are charged against income. The commercial tenants are evaluated on a case by case basis. Certain leases of the commercial properties provide for increasing stepped minimum rents, which are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Concessions made on residential leases are also accounted for on the straight-line basis.
Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the differences between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) managements estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above-market lease values for acquired properties are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options of the respective leases.
Rental Properties: Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; improvements and additions are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the asset and related accumulated depreciation is eliminated from the accounts, and any gain or loss on such disposition is included in income. Fully depreciated assets are removed from the accounts. Rental properties are depreciated by both straight-line and accelerated methods over their estimated useful lives. Upon acquisition of rental property, the Partnership estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships. The Partnership allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. The Partnership records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Partnership considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate
discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.
Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on managements evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenants lease and the Partnerships overall relationship with the respective tenant. Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Partnerships existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenants credit quality and expectations of lease renewals. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases. The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.
In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a rental property may be impaired, an analysis of the value is prepared. The estimated future undiscounted cash flows are compared to the assets carrying value to determine if a write-down to fair value is required.
Financing and Leasing Fees: Financing fees are capitalized and amortized, using the interest method, over the life of the related mortgages. Leasing fees are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease. Unamortized balances are expensed when the corresponding fee is no longer applicable.
Income Taxes: The financial statements have been prepared on the basis that NERA and its subsidiaries are entitled to tax treatment as partnerships. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded.
Cash Equivalents: The Partnership considers cash equivalents to be all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less.
Segment Reporting: Operating segments are revenue producing components of the Partnership for which separate financial information is produced internally for management. Under the definition, NERA operated, for all periods presented, as one segment.
Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income is defined as changes in partners equity, exclusive of transactions with owners (such as capital contributions and dividends). NERA did not have any comprehensive income items in 2010 and 2009 other than net income as reported.
Income Per Unit: Net income per unit has been calculated based upon the weighted average number of units outstanding during each period presented. The Partnership has no dilutive units and, therefore, basic net income is the same as diluted net income per unit (see Note 7).
Concentration of Credit Risks and Financial Instruments: The Partnerships properties are located in New England and the Partnership is subject to the general economic risks related thereto. No single tenant accounted for more than 5% of the Partnerships revenues in 2010 or 2009. The Partnership makes its temporary cash investments with high-credit quality financial institutions. At September 30, 2010, substantially all of the Partnerships cash and cash equivalents were held in interest-bearing accounts at financial institutions, earning interest at rates from 0.05% to 1.0%. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, approximately $5,858,000 and $4,026,000 of cash and cash equivalents, and security deposits included in prepaid expenses and other assets exceeded federally insured amounts.
Advertising Expense: Advertising is expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was $57,288 and $58,884 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Discontinued Operations and Rental Property Held for Sale: When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Partnership discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of
such assets. If, in managements opinion, the net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established. Properties identified as held for sale and/or sold are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Partnership decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.
Interest Capitalized: The Partnership follows the policy of capitalizing interest as a component of the cost of rental property when the time of construction exceeds one year. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and year ended December 31, 2009, there was no capitalized interest.
Extinguishment of Debt: When existing mortgages are refinanced with the same lender and it is determined that the refinancing is substantially different then they are recorded as an extinguishment of debt. However if it is determined that the refinancing is substantially the same then they are recorded as an exchange of debt. All refinancings qualify as extinguishment of debt.
Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform to current period presentation.
NOTE 2. RENTAL PROPERTIES
As of September 30, 2010, the Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships owned 2,269 residential apartment units in 20 residential and mixed-use complexes (collectively, the Apartment Complexes). The Partnership also owns 19 condominium units in a residential condominium complex, all of which are leased to residential tenants (collectively referred to as the Condominium Units). The Apartment Complexes and Condominium Units are located primarily in the metropolitan Boston area of Massachusetts.
Additionally, as of September 30, 2010, the Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships owned a commercial shopping center in Framingham, commercial buildings in Newton and Brookline and mixed-use properties in Boston, Brockton and Newton, all in Massachusetts. These properties are referred to collectively as the Commercial Properties.
The Partnership also owned a 40% or 50% ownership interest in nine residential and mixed use complexes (the Investment Properties) at September 30, 2010 with a total of 798 residential units, two commercial spaces and one parking lot, accounted for using the equity method of consolidation. See Note 14 for summary information on these investments.
Rental properties consist of the following:
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Useful Life |
|
||
Land, improvements and parking lots |
|
$ |
26,100,616 |
|
$ |
26,072,100 |
|
1540 years |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
111,241,625 |
|
111,016,179 |
|
1540 years |
|
||
Kitchen cabinets |
|
4,407,580 |
|
3,977,528 |
|
510 years |
|
||
Carpets |
|
4,058,564 |
|
3,506,481 |
|
510 years |
|
||
Air conditioning |
|
950,546 |
|
882,354 |
|
710 years |
|
||
Laundry equipment |
|
371,096 |
|
367,209 |
|
57 years |
|
||
Elevators |
|
1,021,676 |
|
984,506 |
|
20 years |
|
||
Swimming pools |
|
157,489 |
|
157,489 |
|
10 years |
|
||
Equipment |
|
2,222,068 |
|
2,087,287 |
|
57 years |
|
||
Motor vehicles |
|
142,520 |
|
142,520 |
|
5 years |
|
||
Fences |
|
53,182 |
|
51,882 |
|
510 years |
|
||
Furniture and fixtures |
|
1,138,653 |
|
1,063,897 |
|
57 years |
|
||
Smoke alarms |
|
109,320 |
|
102,123 |
|
57 years |
|
||
|
|
151,974,935 |
|
150,411,555 |
|
|
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
(58,635,156 |
) |
(54,439,618 |
) |
|
|
||
|
|
$ |
93,339,779 |
|
$ |
95,971,937 |
|
|
|
NOTE 3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Partnerships properties are managed by an entity that is owned by the majority shareholder of the General Partner. The management fee is equal to 4% of rental revenue and laundry income on the majority of the Partnerships properties and 3% on Linewt. Total management fees paid were approximately $1,022,000 and $1,012,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Partnership Agreement permits the General Partner or Management Company to charge the costs of professional services (such as counsel, accountants and contractors) to NERA. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, approximately $506,000 and $597,000 was charged to NERA for legal, accounting, construction, maintenance, rental and architectural services and supervision of capital improvements. Of the 2010 expenses referred to above, approximately $238,000 consisted of repairs and maintenance and $247,000 of administrative expense. Approximately $21,000 of expenses for construction, architectural services and supervision of capital projects were capitalized in rental properties. Additionally in 2010, the Hamilton Company received approximately $483,000 from the Investment Properties of which approximately $389,000 was the management fee, approximately $ 71,000 was for repairs and maintenance expenses, approximately $18,000 was for administrative expenses and approximately $4,500 was for construction supervision and architectural fees. The management fee is equal to 4% of rental income at the majority of investment properties and 2% at Dexter Park.
On January 1, 2004, all employees were transferred to the Management Companys payroll. The Partnership reimburses the Management Company for the payroll and related expenses of the employees who work at the properties. Total reimbursement was approximately $2,007,000 and $1,680,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Management Company maintains a 401K plan for all eligible employees whereby the employees may contribute the maximum allowed by law. The plan also provides for discretionary contributions by the employer. There were no employer contributions in 2010 and 2009.
Prior to 1991, the Partnership employed an outside, unaffiliated company to perform its bookkeeping and accounting functions. Since that time, such services have been provided by the Management Companys accounting staff, which consists of approximately 14 people. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Management Company charged the Partnership $93,750 ($125,000 per year) for bookkeeping and accounting services included in administrative expenses of $247,000 above.
In 1996, prior to becoming an employee of the Management Company, the President of the Management Company performed asset management consulting services for the Partnership. This individual continues to perform this service and receives an asset management fee from the Partnership. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, this individual received $75,000 which includes a bonus of $25,000, a quarterly fee of $12,500 for the first quarter of 2010, and quarterly fees of $18,750 in the second quarter and third quarters of 2010. Going forward, the quarterly fee payable to this individual will be $18,750.
The Partnership has invested in nine limited partnerships, which have invested in mixed use residential apartment complexes. The Partnership has a 40% or 50% ownership interest in each investment. The other investors are Harold Brown, the President of the Management Company and five other employees of the Management Company. Harold Browns ownership interest is between 43.2% and 60%. See Note 14 for a description of the properties and their operations.
See Note 8 for information regarding the repurchase of Class B and General Partnership Units.
On October 28, 2009, the Partnership borrowed approximately $7,168,000 with an interest rate of 6% from
HBC Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (HBC). The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand by HBC with six months notice. As of November 12, 2010, the outstanding balance of principal on this loan was $5,868,600. On August 17, 2010, HBC gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000. On October 12, 2010 the Partnership paid HBC $1,300,000 and anticipates paying the balance of the payment demanded of $1,200,000 prior to December 31, 2010. The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBCs right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice. The interest paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $326,000 and $78,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. This loan is collateralized by the Partnerships 99% ownership interest in 62 Boylston Street.
NOTE 4. OTHER ASSETS
Approximately $1,669,000 and $1,426,000 of security deposits are included in prepaid expenses and other assets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The security deposits and escrow accounts are restricted cash.
Included in prepaid expenses and other assets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is approximately $858,000 and $829,000, respectively, held in escrow to fund future capital improvements.
Financing and leasing fees of approximately $978,000 and $1,066,000 are net of accumulated amortization of approximately $511,000 and $450,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
NOTE 5. MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the mortgages payable consisted of various loans, all of which were secured by first mortgages on properties referred to in Note 2. At September 30, 2010, the fixed interest rates on these loans ranged from 4.84% to 7.07%, payable in monthly installments aggregating approximately $726,000, including principal, to various dates through 2023. The majority of the mortgages are subject to prepayment penalties. At September 30, 2010, the weighted average interest rate on the above mortgages was 5.55%. The effective rate of 5.63% includes the amortization expense of deferred financing costs. See Note 12 for fair value information.
The Partnerships have pledged tenant leases as additional collateral for certain of these loans.
Approximate annual maturities at September 30, 2010 are as follows:
2011current maturities |
|
$ |
928,000 |
|
2012 |
|
1,009,000 |
|
|
2013 |
|
43,828,000 |
|
|
2014 |
|
7,806,000 |
|
|
2015 |
|
9,032,000 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
75,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
137,903,000 |
|
In December 2009, the Partnership refinanced Linhart, LLP, located in Newton, Massachusetts. The new loan is $2,000,000, with a rate of 3.75% over the Libor rate or 4.25% whichever is greater and matures five years from the date of closing. The interest rate as of September 30, 2010 was 4.25%. The loan agreement calls for interest only payments for twenty four months and principal and interest payments for the remainder of the five year period based on a thirty year amortization. The loan proceeds were used to pay off the prior loan of approximately $1,700,000, and closing costs of approximately $38,000.
On March 25, 2010, the Partnership refinanced the Brookside Apartments. The new loan is $2,820,000, matures in 2020 and has an interest rate of 5.81%. The loan is a ten year note however it is being amortized over 30
years. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay off the old mortgage of approximately $1,900,000. There were no prepayment penalties.
NOTE 6. ADVANCE RENTAL PAYMENTS AND SECURITY DEPOSITS
The Partnerships residential lease agreements may require tenants to maintain a one-month advance rental payment and/or a security deposit. At September 30, 2010, amounts received for prepaid rents of approximately $1,315,000 are included in cash and cash equivalents, and security deposits of approximately $1,670,000 are included in other assets and are restricted cash.
NOTE 7. PARTNERS CAPITAL
The Partnership has two classes of Limited Partners (Class A and B) and one category of General Partner. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, holders of Class A Units, Class B Units and General Partnership Units must represent 80%, 19% and 1%, respectively, of the total units outstanding. Holders of a class of Partnership Units have equal profit sharing and distribution rights with all other holders of that class of Partnership Units in proportion to their pro rata interests in such class.
In 2010, the Partnership approved quarterly distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) payable on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2010.
In 2009, the Partnership paid quarterly distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) in March, June, September, and December for a total distribution of $28.00 per unit ($2.80 per receipt).
The Partnership has entered into a deposit agreement with an agent to facilitate public trading of limited partners interests in Class A Units. Under the terms of this agreement, the holders of Class A Units have the right to exchange each Class A Unit for 10 Depositary Receipts. The following is information per Depositary Receipt:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Net (loss)income per Depositary Receipt |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
$ |
1.20 |
|
Distributions per Depositary Receipt |
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
NOTE 8. TREASURY UNITS
Treasury Units at September 30, 2010 are as follows:
Class A |
|
38,993 |
|
Class B |
|
9,260 |
|
General Partnership |
|
488 |
|
|
|
48,741 |
|
On August 20, 2007, NewReal, Inc., the General Partner authorized an equity repurchase program (Repurchase Program) under which the Partnership was permitted to purchase, over a period of twelve months, up to 100,000 Depositary Receipts (each of which is one-tenth of a Class A Unit). On January 15, 2008, the General Partner authorized an increase in the Repurchase Program from 100,000 to 200,000 Depositary Receipts. On January 30, 2008 the General Partner authorized an increase the Repurchase Program from 200,000 to 300,000 Depositary Receipts. On March 6, 2008, the General Partner authorized the increase in the total number of Depositary Receipts that could be repurchased pursuant to the Repurchase Program from 300,000 to 500,000. On August 8, 2008, the General Partner re-authorized and renewed the Repurchase Program for an additional 12-month period ended August 19, 2009. On March 22, 2010, the General Partner re-authorized and renewed the Repurchase Program that expired on August 19, 2009. Under the terms of the renewed Repurchase Program, the Partnership may purchase up to 500,000 Depositary Receipts from the start of the program in 2007 through March 31, 2015. The Repurchase Program
requires the Partnership to repurchase a proportionate number of Class B Units and General Partner Units in connection with any repurchases of any Depositary Receipts by the Partnership based upon the 80%, 19% and 1% fixed distribution percentages of the holders of the Class A, Class B and General Partner Units under the Partnerships Second Amended and Restate Contract of Limited Partnership. Repurchases of Depositary Receipts or Partnership Units pursuant to the Repurchase Program may be made by the Partnership from time to time in its sole discretion in open market transactions or in privately negotiated transactions. From August 20, 2007 through September 30, 2010, the Partnership has repurchased 398,320 Depositary Receipts at an average price of $73.59 per receipt (or $735.90 per underlying Class A Unit), 1,724 Class B Units and 91 General Partnership Units, both at an average price of $585.05 per Unit, totaling approximately $30,480,000 including brokerage fees paid by the Partnership.
On September 17, 2008, the Partnership completed the issuance of an aggregate of 6,642 Class A Units held in treasury to current holders of Class B and General Partner Units upon the simultaneous retirement to treasury of 6,309 Class B Units and 333 General Partner Units pursuant to an equity distribution plan authorized by the Board of Directors of the General Partner on August 8, 2008 and as further described under Item 3.02 of the Partnerships Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference. Harold Brown, the treasurer of the General Partner, owns 75% of the issued and outstanding Class B Units of the Partnership and 75% of the issued and outstanding equity of the General Partner, Ronald Brown, the brother of Harold Brown and the president of the General Partner, owns 25% of the issued and outstanding Class B Units of the Partnership and 25% of the issued and outstanding equity of the General Partner.
On January 18, 2008, 113,518 Depositary Receipts included above became available to purchase at a price of $75.50 per receipt. In order for the Partnership to take advantage of this opportunity, the Partnership borrowed $5,285,000 from Harold Brown, the Treasurer of the General Partner. This loan was paid in full, with interest at 6% of $37,899, on February 29, 2008.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the Partnership repurchased 6,896 depositary receipts for $432,920, 164 Class B Units for $102,591 and 9 General Partnership Units for $5,400. The Partnership did not repurchase any depositary receipts or Units during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, the Partnerships are involved in various ordinary routine litigation incidental to their business. The Partnership either has insurance coverage or provides for any uninsured claims when appropriate. The Partnerships are not involved in any material pending legal proceedings.
NOTE 10. RENTAL INCOME
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, approximately 90% of rental income was related to residential apartments and condominium units with leases of one year or less. Approximately 10% was related to commercial properties, which have minimum future annual rental income on non-cancellable operating leases at September 30, 2010 as follows:
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
2,838,000 |
|
2012 |
|
2,377,000 |
|
|
2013 |
|
1,858,000 |
|
|
2014 |
|
1,605,000 |
|
|
2015 |
|
1,071,000 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
1,209,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,958,000 |
|
The aggregate minimum future rental income does not include contingent rentals that may be received under various leases in connection with percentage rents, common area charges and real estate taxes. Aggregate contingent
rentals from continuing operations were approximately $490,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and approximately $583,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Rents receivable are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $785,000 at September 30, 2010 and $476,000 at December 31, 2009. Included in rents receivable at September 30, 2010 is approximately $332,000 resulting from recognizing rental income from non-cancelable commercial leases with future rental increases on a straight-line basis. The majority of this amount is for long-term leases with Staples and Trader Joes at Staples Plaza in Framingham, Massachusetts.
Rents receivable also includes approximately $168,000 representing the straight-line of rental concessions.
In 2010, rent at the commercial properties includes approximately $8,500 of amortization of deferred rents arising from the fair values assigned to in-place leases upon the purchase of Cypress Street in Brookline, Massachusetts.
NOTE 11. CASH FLOW INFORMATION
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, cash paid for interest was approximately $6,141,000, and $5,886,000 respectively.
NOTE 12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we do not have any significant financial assets or financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in our consolidated financial statements.
Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and note payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments or, the recent acquisition of these items.
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we estimated the fair value of our mortgages payable and other notes based upon quoted market prices for the same (Level 1) or similar (Level 2) issues when current quoted market prices are available. We estimated the fair value of our secured mortgage debt that does not have current quoted market prices available by discounting the future cash flows using rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and maturities (Level 3). The differences in the fair value of our debt from the carrying value are the result of differences in interest rates and/or borrowing spreads that were available to us at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, as compared with those in effect when the debt was issued or acquired. The secured mortgage debt contain pre-payment penalties or yield maintenance provisions that could make the cost of refinancing the debt at lower rates exceed the benefit that would be derived from doing so.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Partnership in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
· For cash and cash equivalents, other assets, investment in partnerships, accounts payable, advance rents and security deposits: fair value approximates the carrying value of such assets and liabilities.
· For mortgage notes payable: fair value is generally based on estimated future cash flows, which are discounted using the quoted market rate from an independent source for similar obligations. Refer to the table below for the carrying amount and estimated fair value of such instruments.
The following table reflects the carrying amounts and estimated fair value of our debt.
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
||
Mortgage Notes Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Partnership Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
||
At September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
137,903,103 |
|
$ |
149,087,821 |
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
137,641,354 |
|
$ |
139,997,718 |
|
Investment Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
||
At September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
141,013,383 |
|
$ |
150,721,122 |
|
Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since December 31, 2009 and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
NOTE 13. TAXABLE INCOME AND TAX BASIS
Taxable income reportable by the Partnership and includable in its partners tax returns is different than financial statement income because of a tax free exchanges, accelerated depreciation, different tax lives, and timing differences related to prepaid rents, allowances and intangible assets at significant acquisitions. Taxable income was approximately $300,000 greater than statement income for the year ended December 31, 2009 and approximately $7,500,000 less than statement income for the year ended December 31, 2008. The cumulative tax basis of the Partnerships real estate at December 31, 2009 is approximately $5,200,000 less than the statement basis. The primary reason for the lower tax basis is the acquisition of Linewt and Cypress Street utilizing tax free exchanges in 2008. The Partnerships tax basis in its joint venture investments is approximately $1,500,000 greater than statement basis. Taxable loss for 2010 is estimated to be approximately $200,000 greater than the financial statement loss due to depreciation provisions enacted in the 2010 Tax Act.. Certain entities included in the Partnerships consolidated financial statements are subject to certain state taxes. These taxes are not significant and are recorded as operating expenses in the accompanying consolidates financial statements.
The Partnership adopted the amended provisions related to uncertain tax provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes. As a result of the implementation of the guidance, the Partnership recognized no material adjustments regarding its tax accounting treatment. The Partnership expects to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense, which would be included in general and administrative expense.
In the normal course of business the Partnership or one of its subsidiaries is subject to examination by federal, state and local jurisdictions in which it operates, where applicable. As of September 30, 2010, the tax years that remain subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions under the statute of limitations is from the year 2003 forward.
NOTE 14. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
Since November 2001, the Partnership has invested in nine limited partnerships and limited liability companies, the majority of which have invested in residential apartment complexes, with three partnerships investing in commercial property. The Partnership has between a 40%- 50% ownership interests in each investment. The other investors are Harold Brown, the President of the Management Company and five other employees of the Management Company. Harold Browns ownership interest is between 43.2% and 60%, with the balance owned by the others. A description of each investment is as follows:
On October 28, 2009 the Partnership invested approximately $15,925,000 in a joint venture to acquire a 40% interest in a residential property located in Brookline, Massachusetts. The property, referred to as Dexter Park, is a 409 unit residential complex. The purchase price was $129,500,000. The total mortgage is $89,914,000 with an interest rate of 5.57% and it matures in 2019. The mortgage calls for interest only payments for the first two years of the loan and amortized over 30 years thereafter. In order to fund this investment, the Partnership used approximately $8,757,000 of its cash reserves and borrowed approximately $7,168,000 with an interest rate of 6% from HBC
Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (HBC). The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand by HBC with six months notice. As of November 12, 2010, the outstanding balance of principal on this loan was $5,868,600. On August 17, 2010, HBC gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000. On October 12, 2010, the Partnership paid HBC $1,300,000 and anticipates paying the balance of the payment demanded of $1,200,000 prior to December 31, 2010. The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBCs right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice. The interest paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $326,000 and $78,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. This loan is collateralized by the Partnerships 99% ownership interest in 62 Boylston Street. A majority of the apartments were leased at the time of the acquisition. As a result, the Partnership is amortizing the intangible assets associated with the in place leases over a 12 month period which began in November 2009. The total monthly amortization is approximately $407,000 which at 40% reduces the Partnerships income by approximately $163,000 per month. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the total amortization in connection with these leases is approximately $3,663,000, of which the Partnerships share is approximately $1,465,000. In November 2010, the intangible assets will be fully amortized which will result in lower amortization expense. This investment, Hamilton Park Towers, LLC is referred to as Dexter Park.
On October 3, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,500,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 168-unit apartment complex in Quincy, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $30,875,000. The Partnership plans to sell the majority of units as condominium and retain 48 units for long-term investment. Gains from the sales of units will be taxed at ordinary income rates (approximately $47,000 per unit). In February 2007, the Partnership refinanced the 48 units which will be retained with a new mortgage in the amount of $4,750,000 with an interest rate of 5.57%, interest only for five years. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Bay Apartments, LLC. The loan will be amortized over 30 years thereafter and matures in March 2017. In April 2008, the Partnership refinanced an additional 20 units and obtained a new mortgage in the amount of $2,368,000 with interest at 5.75%, interest only, which matures in 2013. As of October 26, 2010, the Partnership sold 105 units, the proceeds of which went to pay down the mortgage on the property. The balance on the new mortgage is approximately $1,668,000 at September 30, 2010. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Bay, LLC.
On March 7, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,000,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a building comprising 49 apartments, one commercial space and a 50-car surface parking lot located in Boston, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $14,300,000, with a $10,750,000 mortgage. The Partnership plans to operate the building and initiate development of the parking lot. In June 2007, the Partnership separated the parcels, formed an additional limited liability company for the residential apartments and obtained a mortgage on the property. The new limited liability company formed for the residential apartments and commercial space is referred to as Hamilton Essex 81, LLC. In August 2008, the Partnership restructured the mortgages on both parcels at Essex 81 and transferred the residential apartments to Hamilton Essex 81, LLC. The mortgage on Hamilton Essex 81, LLC is $8,600,000 with interest only at 5.79% due in August 2015. The mortgage on Essex Development, LLC, or the parking lot is $2,162,000 with a variable interest rate of 2.25% over the daily Libor rate (0.26% at September 30, 2010) and is due in August 2011. Harold Brown has issued a personal guaranty up to $1,000,000 of this mortgage. In the event that he is obligated to make payments to the lender as a result of this guaranty, the Partnership and other investors have, in turn, agreed to indemnify him for their proportionate share of any such payments. The investment in the parking lot is referred to as Hamilton Essex Development, LLC; the investment in the apartments is referred to as Hamilton Essex 81, LLC.
On March 2, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,352,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 176-unit apartment complex with an additional small commercial building located in Quincy, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $23,750,000. The Partnership sold 127 of the units as condominiums and retained 49 units for long-term investment. The Partnership obtained a new 10-year mortgage in the amount of $5,000,000 on the units to be retained by the Partnership. The interest on the new loan is 5.67% fixed for the 10 year term with interest only payments for five years and amortized over a 30 year period for the balance of the loan term. This investment is referred to as Hamilton 1025, LLC.
In September 2004, the Partnership invested approximately $5,075,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 42-unit apartment complex located in Lexington, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $10,100,000. In October
2004, the Partnership obtained a mortgage on the property in the amount of $8,025,000 and returned $3,775,000 to the Partnership. The Partnership obtained a new 10-year mortgage in the amount of $5,500,000 in January 2007. The interest on the new loan is 5.67% fixed for the ten year term with interest only payments for five years and amortized over a 30 year period for the balance of the loan. This loan required a cash contribution by the Partnership of $1,250,000 in December 2006. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Minuteman, LLC.
In August 2004, the Partnership invested $8,000,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 280-unit apartment complex located in Watertown, Massachusetts. The total purchase price was $56,000,000. As of May 2008, the Partnership sold 137 units as condominiums. Gains from these sales were taxed as ordinary income (approximately $50,000 per unit). The majority of the sales proceeds were applied to reduce the mortgage with the final payment made during the second quarter of 2007. With the sale of the units and the payments of the liabilities, the assets were combined with Hamilton on Main Apartments, LLC. An entity partially owned by the majority shareholder of the General Partner and the President of the management company, 31% and 5%, respectively, was the sales agent and received a variable commission on each sale of 3% to 5%. Hamilton on Main, LLC is known as Hamilton Place.
In 2005, Hamilton on Main Apartments, LLC obtained a ten year mortgage on the three buildings to be retained. The mortgage is $16,825,000, with interest only of 5.18% for three years and amortizing on a 30 year schedule for the remaining seven years when the balance is due. The net proceeds after funding escrow accounts and closing costs on the mortgage were approximately $16,700,000, which were used to reduce the existing mortgage. Hamilton on Main LLC paid a fee of approximately $400,000 in connection with this early extinguishment of debt. At September 30, 2010, the remaining balance on the mortgage is approximately $16,214,000.
In November 2001, the Partnership invested approximately $1,533,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 40-unit apartment building in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This property has a 12-year mortgage, with a remaining balance at September 30, 2010 of approximately $7,215,000 at 6.9% which is amortized on a 30-year schedule, with a final payment of approximately $6,000,000 in 2014. This investment is referred to as 345 Franklin, LLC.
As required by the lender, the Treasurer of the General Partner has provided a limited repayment guaranty equal to fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding balance for the loan on the for sale units at Hamilton Bay and a limited guaranty of $1,000,000 for the loan on Hamilton Essex Development. In the event that he is obligated to make payments to the lenders as a result of these guaranties, the Partnership and other investors have, in turn, agreed to indemnify him for their proportionate share of any such payments.
Summary financial information as of September 30, 2010
|
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
345 |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Dexter Park |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Properties |
|
9,923,795 |
|
2,592,854 |
|
8,740,174 |
|
6,141,924 |
|
2,027,793 |
|
7,657,273 |
|
7,632,705 |
|
23,058,216 |
|
119,788,836 |
|
187,563,571 |
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
|
471 |
|
5,759 |
|
3,894 |
|
4,527 |
|
32,165 |
|
38,884 |
|
90,609 |
|
84,990 |
|
723,378 |
|
984,677 |
|
Rent Receivable |
|
37,056 |
|
|
|
3,815 |
|
6,422 |
|
3,604 |
|
2,333 |
|
1,693 |
|
10,154 |
|
252,374 |
|
317,450 |
|
Real Estate Tax Escrow |
|
80,093 |
|
|
|
37,691 |
|
24,754 |
|
|
|
80,659 |
|
33,905 |
|
97,895 |
|
433,243 |
|
788,240 |
|
Prepaid Expenses & Other Assets |
|
88,057 |
|
768 |
|
94,723 |
|
107,925 |
|
229,161 |
|
91,780 |
|
70,758 |
|
415,367 |
|
1,420,411 |
|
2,518,951 |
|
Financing & Leasing Fees |
|
101,903 |
|
5,738 |
|
26,537 |
|
30,955 |
|
12,900 |
|
40,557 |
|
24,879 |
|
30,019 |
|
533,224 |
|
806,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
10,231,375 |
|
2,605,120 |
|
8,906,835 |
|
6,316,507 |
|
2,305,623 |
|
7,911,486 |
|
7,854,549 |
|
23,696,641 |
|
123,151,467 |
|
192,979,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Notes Payable |
|
8,591,089 |
|
2,162,000 |
|
7,214,588 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
1,668,000 |
|
4,750,000 |
|
5,500,000 |
|
16,213,706 |
|
89,914,000 |
|
141,013,383 |
|
Accounts Payable& Accrued Exp |
|
52,813 |
|
6,285 |
|
96,086 |
|
80,185 |
|
15,555 |
|
8,678 |
|
86,385 |
|
203,577 |
|
751,422 |
|
1,300,986 |
|
Advance Rental Payments & Security Deposits |
|
126,925 |
|
|
|
111,349 |
|
64,193 |
|
20,224 |
|
79,018 |
|
62,199 |
|
228,928 |
|
1,632,665 |
|
2,325,500 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
8,770,827 |
|
2,168,285 |
|
7,422,022 |
|
5,144,378 |
|
1,703,779 |
|
4,837,696 |
|
5,648,584 |
|
16,646,211 |
|
92,298,087 |
|
144,639,869 |
|
Partners Capital |
|
1,460,548 |
|
436,835 |
|
1,484,813 |
|
1,172,129 |
|
601,844 |
|
3,073,790 |
|
2,205,965 |
|
7,050,430 |
|
30,853,380 |
|
48,339,734 |
|
Total Liabilities and Capital |
|
10,231,375 |
|
2,605,120 |
|
8,906,835 |
|
6,316,507 |
|
2,305,623 |
|
7,911,486 |
|
7,854,549 |
|
23,696,641 |
|
123,151,467 |
|
192,979,603 |
|
Partners Capital NERA 50% |
|
730,274 |
|
218,418 |
|
742,407 |
|
586,065 |
|
300,922 |
|
1,536,895 |
|
1,102,982 |
|
3,525,215 |
|
|
|
8,743,177 |
|
NERA 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,341,352 |
|
12,341,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,084,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total units/condominiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartments |
|
48 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
175 |
|
120 |
|
48 |
|
42 |
|
148 |
|
409 |
|
1,030 |
|
Commercial |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total |
|
49 |
|
1 |
|
40 |
|
176 |
|
120 |
|
48 |
|
42 |
|
148 |
|
409 |
|
1,033 |
|
Units to be retained |
|
49 |
|
1 |
|
40 |
|
49 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
42 |
|
148 |
|
409 |
|
786 |
|
Units to be sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
Units sold through Oct. 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
Unsold units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Unsold units with deposits for future sale as of Oct. 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary financial information for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
345 |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton Bay |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton on |
|
Dexter Park |
|
Total |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income |
|
845,971 |
|
207,000 |
|
816,136 |
|
590,388 |
|
165,092 |
|
628,658 |
|
574,388 |
|
1,834,731 |
|
8,213,675 |
|
13,876,041 |
|
|
Laundry and Sundry Income |
|
11,664 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
15,040 |
|
71,488 |
|
100,207 |
|
|
|
|
857,636 |
|
207,000 |
|
817,888 |
|
590,388 |
|
165,092 |
|
628,658 |
|
574,652 |
|
1,849,771 |
|
8,285,163 |
|
13,976,248 |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative |
|
10,305 |
|
(643 |
) |
27,851 |
|
7,718 |
|
4,319 |
|
11,714 |
|
7,003 |
|
30,175 |
|
120,222 |
|
218,664 |
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
319,980 |
|
4,690 |
|
330,567 |
|
202,510 |
|
72,096 |
|
268,819 |
|
241,303 |
|
737,678 |
|
7,650,129 |
|
9,827,772 |
|
|
Management Fees |
|
34,660 |
|
8,280 |
|
33,579 |
|
23,751 |
|
6,940 |
|
24,914 |
|
23,784 |
|
73,507 |
|
181,549 |
|
410,964 |
|
|
Operating |
|
102,208 |
|
(137 |
) |
46,470 |
|
1,207 |
|
(138 |
) |
313 |
|
46,963 |
|
259,188 |
|
682,040 |
|
1,138,114 |
|
|
Renting |
|
23,007 |
|
|
|
41,425 |
|
3,104 |
|
200 |
|
3,698 |
|
3,185 |
|
14,166 |
|
214,696 |
|
303,482 |
|
|
Repairs and Maintenance |
|
109,000 |
|
|
|
61,470 |
|
255,649 |
|
63,716 |
|
281,938 |
|
67,484 |
|
253,745 |
|
675,397 |
|
1,768,399 |
|
|
Taxes and Insurance |
|
137,142 |
|
35,711 |
|
73,680 |
|
95,499 |
|
32,000 |
|
94,888 |
|
76,238 |
|
238,815 |
|
1,108,115 |
|
1,890,088 |
|
|
|
|
736,302 |
|
47,901 |
|
614,843 |
|
589,436 |
|
179,132 |
|
686,284 |
|
465,960 |
|
1,607,274 |
|
10,630,148 |
|
15,557,280 |
|
|
Income (Loss)Before Other Income |
|
121,334 |
|
159,099 |
|
203,045 |
|
953 |
|
(14,040 |
) |
(57,626 |
) |
108,692 |
|
242,497 |
|
(2,344,985 |
) |
(1,581,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
35 |
|
68 |
|
9,239 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
9,358 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
(329,724 |
) |
(46,879 |
) |
(379,392 |
) |
(216,150 |
) |
(73,224 |
) |
(203,035 |
) |
(237,346 |
) |
(644,832 |
) |
(3,827,225 |
) |
(6,007,808 |
) |
|
Gain on Sale of Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
9,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,673 |
|
|
Other Income (Expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
(17,720 |
) |
(8,026 |
) |
|
|
|
(379,722) |
|
(46,877 |
) |
(379,357 |
) |
(216,082 |
) |
(56,264 |
) |
(193,556 |
) |
(237,346 |
) |
(642,659 |
) |
(3,844,940 |
) |
(5,996,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
(258,388 |
) |
112,222 |
|
(176,313 |
) |
(215,129 |
) |
(70,305 |
) |
(251,182 |
) |
(128,654 |
) |
(400,162 |
) |
(6,189,926 |
) |
(7,577,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss - NERA 50% |
|
(129,194 |
) |
56,111 |
|
(88,157 |
) |
(107,565 |
) |
(35,152 |
) |
(125,591 |
) |
(64,326 |
) |
(200,081 |
) |
|
|
(693,955 |
) |
|
NERA 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,475,970 |
) |
(2,475,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,169,925 |
) |
|
Summary financial information for the three months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton Essex |
|
345 |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Dexter |
|
|
|
|
|
Essex 81 |
|
Development |
|
Franklin |
|
1025 |
|
Bay Sales |
|
Bay Apts |
|
Minuteman |
|
on Main |
|
Park |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income |
|
278,486 |
|
69,000 |
|
264,268 |
|
192,019 |
|
58,152 |
|
210,543 |
|
193,368 |
|
611,382 |
|
2,591,295 |
|
4,468,513 |
|
Laundry and Sundry Income |
|
3,838 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
22,704 |
|
31,974 |
|
|
|
282,323 |
|
69,000 |
|
265,318 |
|
192,019 |
|
58,152 |
|
210,543 |
|
193,368 |
|
615,766 |
|
2,613,999 |
|
4,500,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative |
|
2,583 |
|
(477 |
) |
8,879 |
|
4,032 |
|
1,739 |
|
3,638 |
|
1,641 |
|
8,385 |
|
44,138 |
|
74,557 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
106,978 |
|
1,563 |
|
110,916 |
|
67,670 |
|
24,032 |
|
89,752 |
|
81,044 |
|
246,762 |
|
2,558,400 |
|
3,287,118 |
|
Management Fees |
|
10,485 |
|
2,760 |
|
10,158 |
|
8,016 |
|
2,258 |
|
8,355 |
|
7,840 |
|
24,459 |
|
61,045 |
|
135,374 |
|
Operating |
|
30,766 |
|
|
|
15,839 |
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,867 |
|
78,033 |
|
191,189 |
|
326,954 |
|
Renting |
|
12,594 |
|
|
|
6,325 |
|
136 |
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
1,293 |
|
5,199 |
|
91,410 |
|
118,612 |
|
Repairs and Maintenance |
|
40,964 |
|
|
|
32,297 |
|
128,982 |
|
13,587 |
|
62,668 |
|
28,065 |
|
81,201 |
|
295,524 |
|
683,288 |
|
Taxes and Insurance |
|
42,780 |
|
11,467 |
|
23,114 |
|
32,076 |
|
10,476 |
|
19,623 |
|
25,737 |
|
79,282 |
|
339,298 |
|
583,854 |
|
|
|
247,151 |
|
15,313 |
|
207,528 |
|
241,172 |
|
52,091 |
|
185,691 |
|
156,488 |
|
523,321 |
|
3,581,003 |
|
5,209,758 |
|
Income Before Other Income |
|
35,172 |
|
53,687 |
|
57,790 |
|
(49,153 |
) |
6,061 |
|
24,852 |
|
36,880 |
|
92,445 |
|
(967,004 |
) |
(709,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
22 |
|
2,929 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,965 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
(127,875 |
) |
(15,936 |
) |
(125,815 |
) |
(72,833 |
) |
(24,686 |
) |
(68,408 |
) |
(79,974 |
) |
(216,444 |
) |
(1,304,571 |
) |
(2,036,541 |
) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
Other Income (Expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,720 |
) |
(17,915 |
) |
|
|
(127,875 |
) |
(15,936 |
) |
(125,804 |
) |
(72,810 |
) |
(21,757 |
) |
(68,408 |
) |
(79,973 |
) |
(216,443 |
) |
(1,322,291 |
) |
(2,051,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
(92,703 |
) |
37,751 |
|
(68,014 |
) |
(121,963 |
) |
(15,697 |
) |
(43,555 |
) |
(43,093 |
) |
(123,998 |
) |
(2,289,296 |
) |
(2,760,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P&L- NERA 50% |
|
(46,351 |
) |
18,875 |
|
(34,007 |
) |
(60,982 |
) |
(7,848 |
) |
(21,778 |
) |
(21,546 |
) |
(61,998 |
) |
|
|
(235,635 |
) |
P&L- NERA 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(915,718 |
) |
(915,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,151,353 |
) |
Future annual mortgage maturities at September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
345 |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton on |
|
Dexter |
|
|
|
Period End |
|
March |
|
March |
|
November |
|
March |
|
October |
|
October |
|
August |
|
August 2004 |
|
October |
|
Total |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
110,346 |
|
2,162,000 |
|
155,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,461 |
|
|
|
2.685,825 |
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
116,907 |
|
|
|
166,060 |
|
50,135 |
|
|
|
36,421 |
|
49,966 |
|
274,760 |
|
1,093,540 |
|
1,787,790 |
|
September 30, 2013 |
|
123,859 |
|
|
|
177,887 |
|
64,222 |
|
1,668,000 |
|
65,250 |
|
70,339 |
|
289,543 |
|
1,258,232 |
|
3,717,332 |
|
September 30, 2014 |
|
131,223 |
|
|
|
6,715,623 |
|
68,013 |
|
|
|
68,979 |
|
74,491 |
|
305,121 |
|
1,330,133 |
|
8,693,582 |
|
September 30, 2015 |
|
8,108,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
72,028 |
|
|
|
72,921 |
|
78,887 |
|
15,085,823 |
|
1,406,143 |
|
24,824,555 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,745,602 |
|
|
|
4,506,429 |
|
5,226,317 |
|
|
|
84,825,952 |
|
99,304,299 |
|
|
|
8,591,089 |
|
2,162,000 |
|
7,214,588 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
1,668,000 |
|
4,750,000 |
|
5,500,000 |
|
16,213,706 |
|
89,914,000 |
|
141,013,383 |
|
Summary balance sheet as of September 30, 2009
|
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
345 |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Total |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Properties |
|
10,304,195 |
|
2,576,552 |
|
9,121,848 |
|
6,406,791 |
|
2,111,056 |
|
8,007,066 |
|
7,964,514 |
|
24,125,422 |
|
70,617,444 |
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
|
3,959 |
|
13,547 |
|
872 |
|
3,432 |
|
12,595 |
|
526 |
|
25,485 |
|
47,376 |
|
107,791 |
|
Rent Receivable |
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
(4,044 |
) |
6,358 |
|
5,468 |
|
Real Estate Tax Escrow |
|
62,575 |
|
|
|
36,908 |
|
25,490 |
|
|
|
63,274 |
|
51,624 |
|
97,881 |
|
337,751 |
|
Due From Investment Properties |
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
100,000 |
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
222,000 |
|
496,000 |
|
Prepaid Expenses & Other Assets |
|
78,558 |
|
796 |
|
85,015 |
|
79,725 |
|
273,366 |
|
63,860 |
|
65,947 |
|
319,002 |
|
966,268 |
|
Financing & Leasing Fees |
|
125,095 |
|
11,992 |
|
34,703 |
|
35,981 |
|
17,965 |
|
46,919 |
|
28,848 |
|
36,881 |
|
338,383 |
|
Total Assets |
|
10,654,642 |
|
2,602,888 |
|
9,279,346 |
|
6,624,313 |
|
2,514,982 |
|
8,205,644 |
|
8,132,373 |
|
24,854,920 |
|
72,869,106 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Notes Payable |
|
8,600,000 |
|
2,162,000 |
|
7,359,299 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
1,668,000 |
|
4,750,000 |
|
5,500,000 |
|
16,461,242 |
|
51,500,542 |
|
Due to Investment Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
417,000 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
26,000 |
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
496,000 |
|
Accounts Payable & Accrued Expense |
|
47,890 |
|
9,783 |
|
129,135 |
|
15,283 |
|
22,232 |
|
14,747 |
|
49,571 |
|
201,294 |
|
489,936 |
|
Advance Rental Pymts & Security Dep |
|
135,068 |
|
|
|
124,457 |
|
55,496 |
|
15,886 |
|
78,620 |
|
49,269 |
|
203,408 |
|
662,205 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
8,782,958 |
|
2,171,783 |
|
8,029,891 |
|
5,070,779 |
|
1,734,119 |
|
4,869,367 |
|
5,623,840 |
|
16,865,945 |
|
53,148,682 |
|
Partners Capital |
|
1,871,683 |
|
431,105 |
|
1,249,455 |
|
1,553,533 |
|
780,863 |
|
3,336,277 |
|
2,508,532 |
|
7,988,975 |
|
19,720,424 |
|
Total Liabilities & Capital |
|
10,654,642 |
|
2,602,888 |
|
9,279,346 |
|
6,624,313 |
|
2,514,982 |
|
8,205,644 |
|
8,132,373 |
|
24,854,920 |
|
72,869,106 |
|
Partners Capital-NERA50% |
|
935,842 |
|
215,552 |
|
624,727 |
|
776,767 |
|
390,432 |
|
1,668,139 |
|
1,254,266 |
|
3,994,487 |
|
9,860,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total units/condominiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartments |
|
48 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
175 |
|
120 |
|
48 |
|
42 |
|
148 |
|
621 |
|
Commercial |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total |
|
49 |
|
1 |
|
40 |
|
176 |
|
120 |
|
48 |
|
42 |
|
148 |
|
624 |
|
Units to be retained |
|
49 |
|
1 |
|
40 |
|
49 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
42 |
|
148 |
|
377 |
|
Units to be sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
Units sold through October 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
Unsold units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Unsold units with deposits for future sale as of October 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary financial information for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton Essex |
|
345 |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income |
|
839,738 |
|
214,248 |
|
820,442 |
|
596,044 |
|
171,391 |
|
602,117 |
|
571,656 |
|
1,805,764 |
|
5,621,400 |
|
Laundry and Sundry Income |
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
16,265 |
|
20,302 |
|
|
|
841,868 |
|
214,248 |
|
821,782 |
|
596,044 |
|
171,391 |
|
602,117 |
|
572,223 |
|
1,822,029 |
|
5,641,703 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative |
|
12,620 |
|
12,157 |
|
17,056 |
|
18,142 |
|
7,332 |
|
12,363 |
|
7,454 |
|
27,332 |
|
114,458 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
324,135 |
|
3,483 |
|
326,096 |
|
234,872 |
|
79,602 |
|
299,197 |
|
344,364 |
|
1,125,466 |
|
2,737,213 |
|
Management Fees |
|
35,472 |
|
8,301 |
|
33,246 |
|
23,470 |
|
6,775 |
|
23,734 |
|
22,089 |
|
73,464 |
|
226,551 |
|
Operating |
|
101,052 |
|
|
|
46,074 |
|
3,185 |
|
415 |
|
3,915 |
|
61,489 |
|
252,105 |
|
468.236 |
|
Renting |
|
29,350 |
|
|
|
34,795 |
|
4,141 |
|
369 |
|
1,584 |
|
3,337 |
|
11,717 |
|
85,294 |
|
Repairs and Maintenance |
|
83,989 |
|
3,930 |
|
80,008 |
|
197,010 |
|
44,391 |
|
194,281 |
|
56,424 |
|
219,761 |
|
879,795 |
|
Taxes and Insurance |
|
102,155 |
|
55,381 |
|
59,989 |
|
96,836 |
|
34,629 |
|
102,652 |
|
76,349 |
|
225,972 |
|
753,962 |
|
|
|
688,774 |
|
83,252 |
|
597,265 |
|
577,655 |
|
173,514 |
|
637,726 |
|
571,506 |
|
1,935,816 |
|
5,265,508 |
|
Income Before Other Income |
|
153,094 |
|
130,996 |
|
224,517 |
|
18,389 |
|
(2,123 |
) |
(35,610 |
) |
717 |
|
(113,787 |
) |
376,195 |
|
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
(380,094 |
) |
(48,369 |
) |
(386,837 |
) |
(216,120 |
) |
(75,518 |
) |
(202,915 |
) |
(237,305 |
) |
(654,846 |
) |
(2,202,004 |
) |
Interest Income |
|
2 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
54 |
|
11,035 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
11,137 |
|
Gain on Sale of Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,867 |
|
|
|
(380,092 |
) |
(48,369 |
) |
(386,794 |
) |
(216,065 |
) |
(11,616 |
) |
(202,915 |
) |
(237,304 |
) |
(654,844 |
) |
(2,138,000 |
) |
Net Income (Loss) |
|
(226,998 |
) |
82,628 |
|
(162,277 |
) |
(197,676 |
) |
(13,739 |
) |
(238,525 |
) |
(236,587 |
) |
(768,631 |
) |
(1,761,806 |
) |
Net Income (loss)NERA 50% |
|
(113,499 |
) |
41,314 |
|
(81,139 |
) |
(98,838 |
) |
(6,869 |
) |
(119,262 |
) |
(118,293 |
) |
(384,316 |
) |
(880,903 |
) |
Summary financial information for the three months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
345 |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Hamilton |
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income |
|
231,232 |
|
65,950 |
|
261,486 |
|
192,111 |
|
57,414 |
|
202,201 |
|
193,671 |
|
602,926 |
|
1,806,989 |
|
Laundry and Sundry Income |
|
237 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,100 |
|
5,385 |
|
|
|
231,469 |
|
65,950 |
|
261,533 |
|
192,111 |
|
57,414 |
|
202,201 |
|
193,671 |
|
608,026 |
|
1,812,374 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative |
|
4,299 |
|
2,406 |
|
5,888 |
|
9,103 |
|
3,156 |
|
4,408 |
|
1,275 |
|
10,589 |
|
41,123 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
108,024 |
|
1,563 |
|
112,858 |
|
78,723 |
|
26,534 |
|
100,040 |
|
115,607 |
|
376,095 |
|
919,445 |
|
Management Fees |
|
10,530 |
|
2,760 |
|
10,655 |
|
7,447 |
|
2,298 |
|
8,162 |
|
7,781 |
|
24,093 |
|
73,726 |
|
Operating |
|
30,789 |
|
|
|
14,394 |
|
1,777 |
|
285 |
|
198 |
|
14,768 |
|
65,404 |
|
127,613 |
|
Renting |
|
13,850 |
|
|
|
12,245 |
|
1,143 |
|
369 |
|
774 |
|
722 |
|
4,353 |
|
33,456 |
|
Repairs and Maintenance |
|
31,989 |
|
|
|
40,489 |
|
64,413 |
|
14,515 |
|
62,781 |
|
18,030 |
|
82,979 |
|
315,195 |
|
Taxes and Insurance |
|
40,170 |
|
11,082 |
|
20,304 |
|
21,311 |
|
10,565 |
|
16,497 |
|
25,669 |
|
76,276 |
|
221,875 |
|
|
|
239,651 |
|
17,811 |
|
216,832 |
|
183,916 |
|
57,722 |
|
192,861 |
|
183,852 |
|
639,789 |
|
1,732,434 |
|
Income Before Other Income |
|
(8,182 |
) |
48,139 |
|
44,701 |
|
8,194 |
|
(308 |
) |
9,340 |
|
9,819 |
|
(31,764 |
) |
79,940 |
|
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
(128,179 |
) |
(15,737 |
) |
(128,355 |
) |
(72,805 |
) |
(24,681 |
) |
(68,399 |
) |
(79,957 |
) |
(219,837 |
) |
(737,951 |
) |
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
20 |
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
Gain on Sale of Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
(128,179 |
) |
(15,737 |
) |
(128,341 |
) |
(72,785 |
) |
(17,936 |
) |
(68,399 |
) |
(79,957 |
) |
(219,837 |
) |
(731,170 |
) |
Net Income (Loss) |
|
(136,361 |
) |
32,403 |
|
(83,640 |
) |
(64,591 |
) |
(18,244 |
) |
(59,059 |
) |
(70,138 |
) |
(251,601 |
) |
(651,230 |
) |
Net Income (loss)NERA 50% |
|
(68,181 |
) |
16,201 |
|
(41,820 |
) |
(32,295 |
) |
(9,122 |
) |
(29,530 |
) |
(35,069 |
) |
(125,800 |
) |
(325,615 |
) |
NOTE 15. IMPACT OF RECENTLY-ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810), Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary a Scope Clarification
The objective of this Update is to address implementation issues related to the changes in ownership provisions in the Consolidation Overall Subtopic (Subtopic 810-10) of FASB Accounting Standards Codification, originally issued as FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. Subtopic 810-10 establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for noncontrolling interests and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary. An entity is required to deconsolidate a subsidiary when the entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Upon deconsolidation of a subsidiary, an entity recognizes a gain or loss on the transaction and measures retained investment in the subsidiary at fair value. The gain or loss includes any gain or loss associated with the difference between the fair value of the retained investment in the subsidiary and its carrying amount at the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated. In contrast, an entity is required to account for a decrease in its ownership interest of a subsidiary that does not result in a change of control of the subsidiary as an equity transaction. The adoption of this Update did not have a material impact on the Partnerships financial position, results of operations and disclosures contained in its financial statements.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereof appearing elsewhere in this Report. This Report, on Form 10-Q, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the securities law. Actual results or developments could differ materially from those projected in such statements as a result of certain factors set forth in the section below entitles Factors That May Affect Future Results and elsewhere in this Report.
The real estate market in the Greater Boston area has started to stabilize and the Partnership anticipates that the climate will remain the same in the foreseeable future. The Partnership anticipates declining concessions and tepid increases to revenue for the coming quarter because of the minimal production of rental housing and the improving labor market. The Partnership believes its present cash reserves as well as anticipated rental revenue will be sufficient to fund its current operations, finance current planned improvements to its properties, and continue distribution payments in the foreseeable future. Anticipated deterioration and/or loss of a significant commercial tenant may result in the Partnership recording an impairment loss in the future.
Since the Partnerships long-term goals include the acquisition of additional properties, a portion of the proceeds from the refinancing and sale of properties is reserved for this purpose. The Partnership will consider refinancing or selling existing properties if the Partnerships cash reserves are insufficient to repay existing mortgages or if the Partnership needs additional funds for future acquisitions. Should six months notice be given on the loan between the Partnership and HBC Holdings and the cash reserves are not available, the Partnership would consider the refinancing or sale of a Partnership property to satisfy this debt.
Management believes that the financial difficulties experienced since the lending crisis in 2007 have abated but that the recovery will take longer than previous recessions. Management also believes that the recovery at the local level will be slow and steady. While Management has been effective in abating cost increases, real estate tax increases continue to be a reality for the foreseeable future. As expected, Management has observed improved occupancy levels in the Greater Boston Metropolitan Area, the Partnerships primary market. The Partnership believes that the local business climate is improving and expects to see increasing occupancy and revenues for the Partnership in 2011, however there can be no assurance that such increases will be achieved..
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnerships rental income decreased approximately 1.0% from the same period in 2009. Management believes that the modest decline has abated and that early signs of revenue increases have already been experienced through the renewal season. This is evidenced by Octobers rental collections as well as a 38% decline in the vacancy rate compared to the same time last year. As expected, Managements focus on tenant retention
and improved leasing strategies has resulted in a decline in turnover expenses and leasing commissions. Managements decision to shift to gas related utility operations continues to pay off and offset increasing real estate taxes. Management is satisfied with the performance of its latest Joint Venture acquisition, Dexter Park.
The Stock Repurchase Program that was initiated in 2007 has purchased 398,320 Depository Receipts through September 2010. Given the lack of alternative investments, liquidity in the capital markets and the current share price, Management continues to support the buyback program and believes it to be accretive to the remaining shareholders. Management continues to be active bidding on commercial real estate within Massachusetts and remains poised to acquire real estate it deems opportune given the current selling and financing environment.
The Partnership has retained The Hamilton Company (Hamilton) to manage and administer the Partnerships and Joint Ventures Properties. Hamilton is a full-service real estate management company, which has legal, construction, maintenance, architectural, accounting and administrative departments. The Partnerships properties represent approximately 40% of the total properties and 70% of the residential properties managed by Hamilton. Substantially all of the other properties managed by Hamilton are owned, wholly or partially, directly or indirectly, by Harold Brown. The Partnerships Second Amended and Restated Contract of Limited Partnership (the Partnership Agreement) expressly provides that the general partner may employ a management company to manage the properties, and that such management company may be paid a fee of 4% of rental receipts for administrative and management services (the Management Fee). The Partnership pays Hamilton the full annual Management Fee, in monthly installments (2% at Hamilton Park Towers).
At September 30, 2010, Harold Brown, his brother Ronald Brown and the President of Hamilton, Carl Valeri, collectively own approximately 39% of the Depositary Receipts representing the Partnership Class A Units (including Depositary Receipts held by trusts for the benefit of such persons family members). Harold Brown also owns 75% of the Partnerships Class B Units, 75% of the capital stock of NewReal, Inc. (NewReal), the Partnerships sole general partner, and all of the outstanding stock of Hamilton. Ronald Brown also owns 25% of the Partnerships Class B Units and 25% of NewReals capital stock. In addition, Ronald Brown is the President and director of NewReal and Harold Brown is NewReals Treasurer and a director. Two of NewReals other directors, Roberta Ornstein and Conrad DiGregorio, also own immaterial amounts of the Partnerships Class A Units or receipts.
In addition to the Management Fee, the Partnership Agreement further provides for the employment of outside professionals to provide services to the Partnership and allows NewReal to charge the Partnership for the cost of employing professionals to assist with the administration of the Partnerships properties. Additionally, from time to time, the Partnership pays Hamilton for repairs and maintenance services, legal services, construction services and accounting services. The costs charged by Hamilton for these services are at the same hourly rate charged to all entities managed by Hamilton, and management believes such rates are competitive in the marketplace.
Hamilton accounted for approximately 6.5% of the repair and maintenance expense paid for by the Partnership in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 3% for the year ended December 31, 2009. Of the funds paid to Hamilton for this purpose, the great majority was to cover the cost of services provided by the Hamilton maintenance department, including plumbing, electrical, carpentry services, and snow removal for those properties close to Hamiltons headquarters. However, several of the larger Partnership properties have their own maintenance staff. Further, those properties that do not have their own maintenance staff and are located more than a reasonable distance from Hamiltons headquarters in Allston, Massachusetts are generally serviced by local, independent companies.
Hamiltons legal department handles most of the Partnerships eviction and collection matters. Additionally, it prepares most long-term commercial lease agreements and represents the Partnership in selected purchase and sale transactions. Overall, Hamilton provided approximately 76% of the legal services paid for by the Partnership during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Additionally, as described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, The Hamilton Company receives similar fees from the Investment Properties.
The Partnership requires that three bids be obtained for construction contracts in excess of $5,000. Hamilton may be one of the three bidders on a particular project and may be awarded the contract if its bid and its ability to successfully complete the project are deemed appropriate. For contracts that are not awarded to Hamilton, Hamilton charges the Partnership a construction supervision fee equal to 5% of the contract amount. Hamiltons architectural department also provides services to the Partnership on an as-needed basis. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the construction and architectural service provided to the Partnership by Hamilton was insignificant.
Prior to 1991, the Partnership employed an outside, unaffiliated company to perform its bookkeeping and accounting functions. Since that time, such services have been provided by Hamiltons accounting staff, which consists of approximately 14 people. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Hamilton charged the Partnership $93,750 ($125,000 per year) for bookkeeping and accounting services.
For more information on related party transactions, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires the Partnership to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The Partnership regularly and continually evaluates its estimates, including those related to acquiring, developing and assessing the carrying values of its real estate properties and its investments in and advances to joint ventures. The Partnership bases its estimates on historical experience, current market conditions, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. The Partnerships critical accounting policies are those which require assumptions to be made about such matters that are highly uncertain. Different estimates could have a material effect on the Partnerships financial results. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of these policies and estimates may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions and circumstances. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Principles of Consolidation.
Revenue Recognition: Rental income from residential and commercial properties is recognized over the term of the related lease. For residential tenants, amounts 60 days in arrears are charged against income. The commercial tenants are evaluated on a case by case basis. Certain leases of the commercial properties provide for increasing stepped minimum rents, which are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Rental Properties: Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; improvements and additions are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the asset and related accumulated depreciation is eliminated from the accounts, and any gain or loss on such disposition is included in income. Fully depreciated assets are removed from the accounts. Rental properties are depreciated by both straight-line and accelerated methods over their estimated useful lives. Upon acquisition of rental property, the Partnership estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships. The Partnership allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. The Partnership records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Partnership considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.
Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on managements evaluation of the respective tenant. Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include a estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships included the nature and extent of the Partnerships existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenants credit quality and expectations of lease renewals. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases. The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.
In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a rental property may be impaired, analysis of the value is prepared. The estimated future undiscounted cash flows are compared to the assets carrying value to determine if a write-down is required.
Impairment: On an annual basis management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Companys rental properties may be impaired. A propertys value is impaired only if managements estimate of the aggregate
future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property. The Companys estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter managements assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved. The Partnership has not recognized an impairment loss since 1995.
Rental Property Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations: When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Partnership discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. If, in managements opinion, the net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established. Properties identified as held for sale and/or sold are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Investments in Partnerships: The Partnership accounts for its 40-50% ownership in the Investment Properties under the equity method of accounting, as it does not control these entities. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as Investments in Partnerships, and subsequently adjusted for the Partnerships share in earnings, cash contributions and distributions. Under the equity method of accounting, our net equity is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets, and our share of net income or loss from the Partnership is included on the consolidated statements of income.
With respect to investments in and advances to the Investment Properties, the Partnership looks to the underlying properties to assess performance and the recoverability of carrying amounts for those investments in a manner similar to direct investments in real estate properties. An impairment charge is recorded if managements estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.
Legal Proceedings: The Partnership is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise, from time to time, in the ordinary course of business. These matters are frequently covered by insurance. If it is determined that a loss is likely to occur, the estimated amount of the loss is recorded in the financial statements. Both the amount of the loss and the point at which its occurrence is considered likely can be difficult to determine.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2010 to the three months ended September 30, 2009
The Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships incurred a loss of approximately $781,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to income of approximately $299,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease in income of approximately $1,080,000.
The rental activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
Occupancy Date |
|
||
|
|
October 26, 2010 |
|
October 26, 2009 |
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
|
2,288 |
|
2,288 |
|
Vacancies |
|
69 |
|
111 |
|
Vacancy rate |
|
3.0 |
% |
4.9 |
% |
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
Total square feet |
|
114,395 |
|
114,395 |
|
Vacancy |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
Vacancy rate |
|
0 |
% |
0 |
% |
|
|
Rental Income (in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Continuing |
|
Total |
|
Continuing |
|
||||
Total rents |
|
$ |
8,120 |
|
$ |
8,120 |
|
$ |
8,090 |
|
$ |
8,090 |
|
Residential percentage |
|
90 |
% |
90 |
% |
90 |
% |
90 |
% |
||||
Commercial percentage |
|
10 |
% |
10 |
% |
10 |
% |
10 |
% |
||||
Contingent rentals |
|
$ |
175 |
|
$ |
175 |
|
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
136 |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Dollar |
|
Percent |
|
|||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
|||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Rental income |
|
$ |
8,119,956 |
|
$ |
8,089,673 |
|
30,283 |
|
0.4 |
% |
|
Laundry and sundry income |
|
106,772 |
|
119,893 |
|
(13,121 |
) |
(10.9 |
)% |
|||
|
|
8,226,728 |
|
8,209,566 |
|
17,162 |
|
0.2 |
% |
|||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Administrative |
|
409,134 |
|
416,398 |
|
(7,264 |
) |
(1.7 |
)% |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
1,493,664 |
|
1,591,668 |
|
(98,004 |
) |
(6.2 |
)% |
|||
Management fees |
|
342,010 |
|
334,745 |
|
7,265 |
|
2.2 |
% |
|||
Operating |
|
795,912 |
|
689,871 |
|
106,041 |
|
15.4 |
% |
|||
Renting |
|
209,277 |
|
262,234 |
|
(52,957 |
) |
(20.2 |
)% |
|||
Repairs and maintenance |
|
1,504,045 |
|
1,435,264 |
|
68,781 |
|
4.8 |
% |
|||
Taxes and insurance |
|
1,039,924 |
|
891,239 |
|
148,685 |
|
16.7 |
% |
|||
|
|
5,793,966 |
|
5,621,419 |
|
172,547 |
|
3.1 |
% |
|||
Income Before Other Income and Discontinued Operations |
|
2,432,762 |
|
2,588,147 |
|
(155,385 |
) |
(6.0 |
)% |
|||
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
(2,064,796 |
) |
(1,978,591 |
) |
86,205 |
|
4.4 |
% |
|||
Interest income |
|
1,898 |
|
15,270 |
|
(13,372 |
) |
(87.6 |
)% |
|||
(Loss) from investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
(1,151,355 |
) |
(325,614 |
) |
825,741 |
|
253.6 |
% |
|||
Other income (loss) |
|
|
|
93 |
|
(93 |
) |
NA |
|
|||
|
|
(3,214,253 |
) |
(2,288,842 |
) |
925,411 |
|
40.4 |
% |
|||
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(781,491 |
) |
$ |
299,305 |
|
$ |
(1,080,796 |
) |
(361.1 |
)% |
Rental income from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $8,120,000, compared to approximately $8,090,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $30,000 (0.4%). Properties with the most significant increases in rental income in the third quarter of 2010 compared to 2009 include; 62 Boylston Street, 1131 Commonwealth Avenue, Redwood Hills, Westgate Woburn, 1144 Commonwealth Avenue, 140 North Beacon Street, and Cypress Street with increases of approximately $56,000, $42,000, $40,000, $38,000, $31,000, $30,000, and $18,000 respectively. These rental income increases are offset by the amortization of approximately $70,000 in connection with the free rent granted to tenants.
Expenses from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were approximately $5,794,000 compared to approximately $5,621,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $172,000 (3.1%). The most significant factors contributing to this increase was an increase in taxes and insurance of approximately $149,000 (16.7%) due to an increase in real estate taxes as well as insurance premiums; an increase in operating expenses of approximately $106,000 (15.4%) due to an increase in utility costs; an increase in repairs and maintenance expenses of approximately $69,000 (4.8%) due to significant repairs at the properties in an effort to maintain occupancy. These increases are offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $98,000 (6.2%) due to assets being fully depreciated; a decrease in renting expenses of approximately $53,000 (20.2%) due to a decrease in rental commissions. Interest expense increased approximately $86,000 (4.4%) due primarily to the $7,168,600 borrowed in October 2009.
At September 30, 2010, the Partnership has a 40 - 50% ownership interest in nine Investment Properties. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail of the financial information of each Investment Property.
As described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Partnerships share of the net loss from the Investment Properties was approximately $1,151,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a loss of approximately $326,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $826,000. Included in this loss is depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $1,280,000. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the loss associated with the 2009 acquisition of Dexter Park is approximately $916,000, of which approximately $1,023,000 is depreciation and amortization. See the nine month discussion of Dexter Park for additional information.
Interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $1,900 compared to approximately $15,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $13,000 (87.6%). This decrease is due to a decrease in the cash available for investment as well as a drop in interest rates.
As a result of the changes discussed above, net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $781,000 compared to income of approximately $299,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a change of approximately $1,080,000.
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2009
The Partnership and its subsidiary Partnerships earned income before other income and discontinued operations of approximately $7,928,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to approximately $8,319,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $391,000(4.7%). The following is a summary of the Partnerships operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
Dollar |
|
Percent |
|
|||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
|||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Rental income |
|
$ |
24,432,776 |
|
$ |
24,634,345 |
|
$ |
(201,569 |
) |
(0.8 |
)% |
Laundry and sundry income |
|
342,698 |
|
312,263 |
|
30,435 |
|
9.7 |
% |
|||
|
|
24,775,474 |
|
24,946,608 |
|
(171,134 |
) |
(0.7 |
)% |
|||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Administrative |
|
1,331,734 |
|
1,277,745 |
|
53,989 |
|
4.2 |
% |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
4,290,983 |
|
4,513,165 |
|
(222,182 |
) |
(4.9 |
)% |
|||
Management fees |
|
1,022,230 |
|
1,011,531 |
|
10,699 |
|
1.1 |
% |
|||
Operating |
|
2,902,157 |
|
3,064,201 |
|
(162,044 |
) |
(5.3 |
)% |
|||
Renting |
|
384,273 |
|
406,363 |
|
(22,090 |
) |
5.4 |
% |
|||
Repairs and maintenance |
|
3,756,649 |
|
3,580,895 |
|
175,754 |
|
4.9 |
% |
|||
Taxes and insurance |
|
3,159,361 |
|
2,773,745 |
|
385,616 |
|
13.9 |
% |
|||
|
|
16,847,387 |
|
16,627,645 |
|
219,742 |
|
1.3 |
% |
|||
Income Before Other Income |
|
7,928,087 |
|
8,318,963 |
|
(390,876 |
) |
(4.7 |
)% |
|||
Other Income (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
(6,141,468 |
) |
(5,885,831 |
) |
255,637 |
|
4.3 |
% |
|||
Interest income |
|
4,411 |
|
47,861 |
|
(43,450 |
) |
(90.7 |
)% |
|||
Gain on sale of equipment |
|
|
|
(2,726 |
) |
2,726 |
|
NA |
|
|||
(Loss) from investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
(3,169,926 |
) |
(880,902 |
) |
(2,289,024 |
) |
259.8 |
% |
|||
|
|
(9,306,983 |
) |
(6,721,598 |
) |
(2,585,385 |
) |
38.5 |
% |
|||
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,378,896 |
) |
$ |
1,597,365 |
|
$ |
(2,976,261 |
) |
(186.3 |
)% |
Rental income from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $24,433,000 compared to approximately $24,634,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $202,000 (0.8%). This decrease in rental income is due to the amortization of approximately $306,000 in connection with the free rent granted to tenants. The following properties experienced rental income increases: 62 Boylston Street, Westgate Apartments, Redwood Hills, Westside Colonial and 1144 Commonwealth Avenue with increases of approximately $69,000, $66,000, $58,000, $45,000, and $39,000 respectively.
Expenses from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were approximately $16,847,000 compared to approximately $16,628,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $219,000 (1.3%). The most significant factor contributing to this increase is an increase in taxes and insurance of approximately $386,000 (13.9%); an increase in administrative expenses of approximately $54,000(4.2%); and an increase in repairs and maintenance expenses of approximately $176,000(4.9%). These increases are offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $222,000 (4.9%), a decrease in operating expenses of approximately $162,000(5.3%) and a decrease in renting expenses of approximately $22,000 (5.4%). The reasons for these changes are discussed in the section for the results for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Interest expense increased approximately $256,000 (4.3%) due to a higher level of debt offset by lower interest rates as well as the $7,168,000 note borrowed for the Dexter Park acquisition in October 2009.
At September 30, 2010, the Partnership has between a 40 - 50% ownership interest in nine Investment Properties. See a description of these properties included in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail of the financial information of each Investment Property.
As described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Partnerships share of loss from these Investment Properties was approximately $3,170,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a loss of approximately $881,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $2,289,000. Included in the net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is depreciation and amortization of approximately $4,149,000.
As discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Partnership acquired Dexter Park in October 2009. A majority of the apartments were leased at the time of the acquisition. As a result, the Partnership is amortizing the intangible assets associated with the in place leases over a 12 month period which began in November 2009. The total monthly amortization is approximately $407,000 which at 40% reduces the Partnerships income by approximately $163,000 per month. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the total amortization in connection with these leases is approximately $3,663,000, of which the Partnerships share is approximately $1,465,000. In November 2010, the intangible assets will be fully amortized which will result in lower amortization expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnerships share of loss on Dexter Park is approximately $2,476,000.
Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $4,400 compared to approximately $48,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $43,600 (90.7%). This decrease is due to a drop in interest rates.
As a result of the changes discussed above, net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $1,378,896 compared to income of $1,597,365 for nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease in income of $2,976,261(186.3%).
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Partnerships principal source of cash during 2010 and 2009 was the collection of rents and refinancing of partnership properties. The majority of cash and cash equivalents of $4,814,195 at September 30, 2010 and $2,879,663 at December 31, 2009 was held in interest bearing accounts at creditworthy financial institutions.
This increase of $1,934,532 at September 30, 2010 is summarized as follows:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
5,841,425 |
|
$ |
6,926,084 |
|
Cash (used in) investing activities |
|
(853,380 |
) |
(4,710,631 |
) |
||
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
254,607 |
|
(631,215 |
) |
||
Repurchase of Depositary Receipts, Class B and General Partner Units |
|
(540,911 |
) |
(1,514,340 |
) |
||
Distributions paid |
|
(2,767,209 |
) |
(2,787,414 |
) |
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,934,532 |
|
$ |
(2,717,516 |
) |
The cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to the collection of rents less cash operating expenses. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is due to a deposit on a future acquisition in 2009 as well as a decrease in 2010 in improvements to the Partnerships rental properties. The increase in cash provided by financing activities is due to the refinancing of a Partnership property in 2010, resulting in an increase in cash, as well as a decrease in the amount of the stock buyback in 2010.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships completed improvements to certain of the properties at a total cost of approximately $1,563,000. These improvements were funded from cash reserves and, to some extent, escrow accounts established in connection with the financing or refinancing of the applicable properties. These sources have been adequate to fully fund improvements. The most significant improvements were made at Westgate Woburn, 62 Boylston Street, Hamilton Oaks, Westside Colonial and 1144 Commonwealth Avenue, at a cost of
approximately $220,000, $195,000, $150,000, $143,000 and $100,000 respectively. The Partnership plans to invest approximately $604,000 in additional capital improvements in 2010.
In 2010, the Partnership approved quarterly distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) payable on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2010.
In 2009, the Partnership paid quarterly distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) in March, June, September, and December for a total distribution of $28.00 per unit ($2.80 per receipt).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the Partnership repurchased 6,896 depositary receipts for $432,920, 164 Class B Units for $102,591 and 9 General Partnership Units for $5,400. The Partnership did not repurchase any depositary receipts or Units during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
On August 17, 2010, HBC Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (HBC), gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000 on the outstanding loan to the Partnership which had a balance of $5,868,600 on November 12, 2010. On October 12, 2010, the Partnership paid HBC $1,300,000 and anticipates paying the balance of the payment demanded of $1,200,000 prior to December 31, 2010. The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBCs right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice.
In December 2009, the Partnership refinanced Linhart, LLP, located in Newton, Massachusetts. The new loan is $2,000,000, with a rate of 3.75% over the Libor rate or 4.25% whichever is greater and matures five years from the date of closing. The interest rate as of September 30, 2010 was 4.25%. The loan agreement calls for interest only payments for twenty four months and principal and interest payments for the remainder of the five year period based on a thirty year amortization. The loan proceeds were used to pay off the prior loan of approximately $1,700,000, and closing costs of approximately $38,000.
On March 25, 2010, the Partnership refinanced the NERA Brookside Associates, LLC. The new loan is $2,820,000, matures in 2020 and has an interest rate of 5.81%. The loan is a ten year note however it is being amortized over 30 years. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay off the old mortgage of approximately $1,900,000. There were no prepayment penalties.
The Partnership anticipates that cash from operations and interest bearing accounts will be sufficient to fund its current operations and to finance current improvements to its properties. The Partnerships net income and cash flow may fluctuate dramatically from year to year as a result of the sale of properties, increases or decreases in rental income or expenses, or the loss of significant tenants.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements-Joint Venture Indebtedness
As of September 30, 2010, the Partnership had between a 40 - 50% ownership interest in nine joint ventures, all of which have mortgage indebtedness. We do not have control of these partnerships and therefore we account for them using the equity method. At September 30, 2010, our proportionate share of the non-recourse debt related to these investments was equal to approximately $61,515,000. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations
See Notes 5 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of mortgage notes payable. The Partnerships have no other material contractual obligations to be disclosed.
Factors That May Affect Future Results
Certain information contained herein includes forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Liquidation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act). While forward looking statements reflect managements good faith beliefs when those statements are made, caution should be exercised in interpreting and relying on such forward looking statements, the realization of which may be impacted by known and unknown risks and uncertainties, events that may occur subsequent to the forward-looking statements, and other factors which may be beyond the Partnerships control and which can materially affect the Partnerships actual results, performance or achievements for 2010 and beyond. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties mentioned below materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove
incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.
Along with risks detailed from time to time in the Partnerships filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, some factors that could cause the Partnerships actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following:
The Partnership depends on the real estate markets where its properties are located, primarily in Eastern Massachusetts and these markets may be adversely affected by local economic market conditions, which are beyond the Partnerships control.
The Partnership is subject to the general economic risks affecting the real estate industry, such as dependence on tenants financial condition and the need to enter into new leases or renew leases on terms favorable to tenants in order to generate rental revenues and our ability to collect rents from our tenants.
The Partnership is also impacted by changing economic conditions making alternative housing arrangements more or less attractive to the Partnerships tenants, such as the interest rates on single family home mortgages and the availability and purchase price of single-family homes in the Greater Boston metropolitan area.
The Partnership is subject to significant expenditures associated with each investment, such as debt service payments, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, which are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in revenues from a property.
The Partnership is subject to increases in heating and utility costs that may arise as a result of economic and market conditions and fluctuations in seasonal weather conditions.
Civil disturbances, earthquakes and other natural disasters may result in uninsured or underinsured losses.
Actual or threatened terrorist attacks may adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and the value of our properties.
Financing or refinancing of Partnership properties may not be available to the extent necessary or desirable, or may not be available on favorable terms.
The Partnership properties face competition from similar properties in the same market. This competition may affect the Partnerships ability to attract and retain tenants and may reduce the rents that can be charged.
Given the nature of the real estate business, the Partnership is subject to potential environmental liabilities. These include environmental contamination in the soil at the Partnerships or neighboring real estate, whether caused by the Partnership, previous owners of the subject property or neighbors of the subject property, and the presence of hazardous materials in the Partnerships buildings, such as asbestos, mold and radon gas. Management is not aware of any material environmental liabilities at this time.
Insurance coverage for and relating to commercial properties is increasingly costly and difficult to obtain. In addition, insurance carriers have excluded certain specific items from standard insurance policies, which have resulted in increased risk exposure for the Partnership. These include insurance coverage for acts of terrorism and war, and coverage for mold and other environmental conditions. Coverage for these items is either unavailable, or prohibitively expensive.
Market interest rates could adversely affect the market prices for Class A Partnership Units and Depositary Receipts as well as performance and cash flow.
Changes in income tax laws and regulations may affect the income taxable to owners of the Partnership. These changes may affect the after-tax value of future distributions.
The Partnership may fail to identify, acquire, construct, or develop additional properties; may develop or acquire properties that do not produce a desired or expected yield on invested capital; may be unable to sell poorly- performing or otherwise undesirable properties quickly; or may fail to effectively integrate acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties.
Risks associated with the use of debt to fund acquisitions and developments.
Competition for acquisitions may result in increased prices for properties.
Any weakness identified in the Partnerships internal controls as part of the evaluation being undertaken by the Partnership and its independent public accountants pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could have an adverse effect on the Partnerships business.
Ongoing compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 may require additional personnel or system changes.
The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive or as an admission regarding the adequacy of disclosures made by the Partnership prior to the date hereof or the effectiveness of said Act. The Partnership expressly disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward- looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The residential real estate market in the Greater Boston area has softened and the Partnership anticipates the climate will remain the same in the foreseeable future. This may result in increases in vacancy rates and/or a reduction in rents. The Partnership believes its present cash reserves as well as anticipated rental revenue will be sufficient to fund its current operations, and to finance current planned improvements to its properties and continue dividend payments in the foreseeable future.
Since the Partnerships long-term goals include the acquisition of additional properties, a portion of the proceeds from the refinancing and sale of properties is reserved for this purpose. The Partnership will consider refinancing existing properties if the Partnerships cash reserves are insufficient to repay existing mortgages or if the Partnership needs additional funds for future acquisitions.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As of September 30, 2010, the Partnership, its Subsidiary Partnerships and the Investment Properties collectively have approximately $286,000,000 in long-term debt, substantially all of which pays interest at fixed rates. Accordingly, the fair value of these debt instruments is affected by changes in market interest rates. These mortgages mature through 2023. For information regarding the fair value and maturity dates of these debt obligations, see Item 2 and Notes 5, 12 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For additional disclosure about market risk, see Part I. Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsFactors That May Affect Future Results.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Companys management, with the participation of the president and chief financial officer of its general partner, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the president and chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Companys general partner have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
The Partnership, the Subsidiary Partnerships and their properties are not presently subject to any material litigation, and, to managements knowledge, there is not any material litigation presently threatened against them. The Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships are occasionally subject to ordinary routine legal and administrative proceedings incident to the ownership of residential and commercial real estate. Some of the legal and other expenses related to these proceedings are covered by insurance and none of these costs and expenses are expected to have a material adverse effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership.
There were no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) None
(b) None.
(c) None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
None.
(a) See the exhibit index below.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
(31.1) |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Ronald Brown, Principal Executive Officer of the Partnership (President and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership) |
(31.2) |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Harold Brown, Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership (Treasurer and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership) |
(32.1) |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Ronald Brown, Principal Executive Officer of the Partnership (President and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership) and Harold Brown, Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership (Treasurer and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership). |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
NEW ENGLAND REALTY
ASSOCIATES LIMITED |
|
|
By: |
/s/ NEWREAL, INC. |
|
|
Its General Partner |
|
By: |
/s/ RONALD BROWN |
|
|
Ronald Brown, President |
Dated: November 12, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
/s/ RONALD BROWN |
|
President and Director of the General Partner |
|
November 12, 2010 |
Ronald Brown |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
/s/ HAROLD BROWN |
|
Treasure and Director to the General Partner |
|
November 12, 2010 |
Harold Brown |
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|