Annual Statements Open main menu

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             

 

Commission file number 0-12138

 


 

New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Massachusetts
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

 

04-2619298
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)

 

39 Brighton Avenue, Allston, Massachusetts
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

02134
(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 783-0039

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Depositary Receipts
(Title of each Class)

 

NYSE AMEX
(Name of each Exchange on which Registered)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Class A

Limited Partnership Units

(Title of class)

 

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o No x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o No o (the Registrant is not yet required to submit Interactive Data)Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

 

As of September 30, 2010, there were 105,188 of the registrant’s Class A units (1,051,876 Depositary Receipts) of limited partnership issued and outstanding and 24,982 Class B units issued and outstanding.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

INDEX

 

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

 

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009

 

Notes to Financial Statements

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

Item 5.

Other Information

Item 6.

Exhibits

SIGNATURES

 

2



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P.

 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

The accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, statements of income, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows and related notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, which are in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation for the interim periods.

 

The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

 

The aforementioned financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the aforementioned financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the financial statements and notes thereto included in New England Realty Associates L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

 

The results of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period.

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

September 30, 2010

 

December 31, 2009

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

(Audited)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties

 

$

93,339,779

 

$

95,971,937

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

4,814,195

 

2,879,663

 

Rents Receivable

 

698,505

 

1,038,820

 

Real Estate Tax Escrows

 

254,758

 

311,582

 

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets

 

3,474,079

 

2,857,288

 

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

 

21,084,527

 

24,964,453

 

Financing and Leasing Fees

 

977,690

 

1,065,993

 

Total Assets

 

$

124,643,533

 

$

129,089,736

 

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

Note Payable

 

$

7,168,600

 

$

7,168,600

 

Mortgage Notes Payable

 

137,903,103

 

137,641,354

 

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

 

2,235,510

 

2,195,245

 

Advance Rental Payments and Security Deposits

 

3,356,160

 

3,417,361

 

Total Liabilities

 

150,663,373

 

150,422,560

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 3 and 9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital 131,484 and 132,346 units outstanding in 2010 and 2009, respectively

 

(26,019,840

)

(21,332,824

)

Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital

 

$

124,643,533

 

$

129,089,736

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

8,119,956

 

$

8,089,673

 

$

24,432,776

 

$

24,634,345

 

Laundry and sundry income

 

106,772

 

119,893

 

342,698

 

312,263

 

 

 

8,226,728

 

8,209,566

 

24,775,474

 

24,946,608

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

409,134

 

416,398

 

1,331,734

 

1,277,745

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

1,493,664

 

1,591,668

 

4,290,983

 

4,513,165

 

Management fees

 

342,010

 

334,745

 

1,022,230

 

1,011,531

 

Operating

 

795,912

 

689,871

 

2,902,157

 

3,064,201

 

Renting

 

209,277

 

262,234

 

384,273

 

406,363

 

Repairs and maintenance

 

1,504,045

 

1,435,264

 

3,756,649

 

3,580,895

 

Taxes and insurance

 

1,039,924

 

891,239

 

3,159,361

 

2,773,745

 

 

 

5,793,966

 

5,621,419

 

16,847,387

 

16,627,645

 

Income Before Other Income and Discontinued Operations

 

2,432,762

 

2,588,147

 

7,928,087

 

8,318,963

 

Other Income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

1,898

 

15,270

 

4,411

 

47,861

 

Interest expense

 

(2,064,796

)

(1,978,591

)

(6,141,468

)

(5,885,831

)

Gain(Loss) on the sale of equipment

 

 

93

 

 

(2,726

)

(Loss) from investment in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

(1,151,355

)

(325,614

)

(3,169,926

)

(880,902

)

 

 

(3,214,253

)

(2,288,842

)

(9,306,983

)

(6,721,598

)

Net Income (loss)

 

$

(781,491

)

$

299,305

 

$

(1,378,896

)

$

1,597,365

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income per Unit

 

$

(5.94

)

$

2.26

 

$

(10.46

)

$

11.99

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding

 

131,485

 

132,556

 

131,767

 

133,175

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Unit

 

Partner’s Capital

 

 

 

Limited

 

General

 

 

 

Treasury

 

 

 

Limited

 

General

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

 

Class B

 

Partnership

 

Subtotal

 

Units

 

Total

 

Class A

 

Class B

 

Partnership

 

Total

 

Balance, January 1, 2009

 

144,180

 

34,243

 

1,802

 

180,225

 

44,974

 

135,251

 

$

(14,173,745

)

$

(3,366,265

)

$

(177,172

)

$

(17,717,182

)

Distribution to Partners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,229,931

)

(529,609

)

(27,874

)

(2,787,414

)

Stock Buyback

 

 

 

 

 

2,905

 

(2,905

)

(1,214,734

)

(284,626

)

(14,980

)

(1,514,340

)

Net Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,277,892

 

303,499

 

15,974

 

1,597,365

 

Balance, September 30, 2009

 

144,180

 

34,243

 

1,802

 

180,225

 

47,879

 

132,346

 

$

(16,340,518

)

$

(3,877,001

)

$

(204,052

)

$

(20,421,571

)

Balance, January 1, 2010

 

144,180

 

34,243

 

1,802

 

180,225

 

47,879

 

132,346

 

$

(17,069,520

)

$

(4,050,138

)

$

(213,165

)

$

(21,332,823

)

Distribution to Partners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,213,767

)

(525,770

)

(27,672

)

(2,767,209

)

Stock Buyback

 

 

 

 

 

862

 

(862

)

(432,920

)

(102,591

)

(5,400

)

(540,911

)

Net (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,103,118

)

(261,990

)

(13,789

)

(1,378,897

)

Balance, September 30, 2010

 

144,180

 

34,243

 

1,802

 

180,225

 

48,741

 

131,484

 

$

(20,819,325

)

$

(4,940,489

)

$

(260,026

)

$

(26,019,840

)

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(1,378,896

)

$

1,597,365

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

4,290,983

 

4,513,165

 

Loss from investment in joint ventures

 

3,169,926

 

880,902

 

Gain (loss) on the sale of equipment

 

 

2,726

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in rents receivable

 

340,315

 

(149,645

)

(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expense

 

40,265

 

(159,481

)

Decrease in real estate tax escrow

 

56,824

 

2,676

 

(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets

 

(616,791

)

238,682

 

(Decrease) in advance rental payments and security deposits

 

(61,201

)

(306

)

Total Adjustments

 

7,220,321

 

5,328,719

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

5,841,425

 

6,926,084

 

Cash Flows provided by (used in) Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net proceeds from the sale of equipment

 

 

13,733

 

Investment in consolidated joint venture

 

(40,000

)

 

 

Deposit on future acquisition

 

 

(2,660,500

)

Proceeds from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

750,000

 

282,500

 

Purchase and improvement of rental properties

 

(1,563,380

)

(2,346,364

)

Net cash (used in) investing activities

 

(853,380

)

(4,710,631

)

Cash Flows provided by (used in) Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Payment of financing costs

 

(7,143

)

(18,687

)

Principal payments of mortgage notes payable

 

(642,372

)

(612,528

)

Stock buyback

 

(540,911

)

(1,514,340

)

Proceeds of mortgage notes payable

 

904,122

 

 

Distributions to partners

 

(2,767,209

)

(2,787,414

)

Net cash (used in) financing activities

 

(3,053,513

)

(4,932,969

)

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

1,934,532

 

(2,717,516

)

Cash and Cash Equivalents, at beginning of period

 

2,879,663

 

10,752,931

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, at end of period

 

$

4,814,195

 

$

8,035,415

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

 

(UNAUDITED)

 

NOTE 1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Line of Business:  New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (“NERA” or the “Partnership”) was organized in Massachusetts in 1977. NERA and its subsidiaries own and operate various residential apartment buildings, condominium units and commercial properties located in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. NERA has also made investments in other real estate partnerships and has participated in other real estate related activities, primarily located in Massachusetts.

 

Accounting Standards: On July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, also known as FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC 105-10”), General Accepted Accounting Principles (“ASC 105-10”).  ASC 105-10 established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities.  Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.  The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.  All other non -grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative.  Following the Codification, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts.  Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.  GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB’s Codification project, but it will change the way the guidance is organized and presented.  As a result, these changes will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  The Partnership has implemented the Codification in this report by providing references to the Codification topics, as appropriate.

 

Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NERA and its subsidiaries. NERA has a 99.67% to 100% ownership interest in each subsidiary except for the nine limited liability companies (the “Investment Properties” or “Joint Ventures”) in which the Partnership has a 40 - 50% ownership interest. The consolidated group is referred to as the “Partnerships”. Minority interests are not recorded, since they are insignificant. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Partnership accounts for its investment in the above-mentioned Investment Properties using the equity method of consolidation. (See Note 14: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures).

 

The Partnership accounts for its investments in joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, and subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions. The authoritative guidance on consolidation provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIE (the “primary beneficiary”).  Generally, the consideration of whether an entity is a VIE applies when either (1) the equity investors (if any) lack one or more of the essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest, (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.

 

On January 1, 2010, the Partnership adopted the updated provisions of ASC 810, pursuant to FASB No. 167, which amends FIN 46® to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a

 

7



Table of Contents

 

variable interest entity.  Additionally, FASB No. 167 amends FIN 46® to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, which was based on determining which enterprise absorbs the majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both.  FASB No. 167 amends certain guidance in Interpretation 46® for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. Also, FASB No. 167 amends FIN 46® to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity.  The enhanced disclosures are required for any enterprise that holds a variable interest in a variable interest entity.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to these financial statements.

 

Impairment:  On an annual basis management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Partnership’s rental properties or investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries may be impaired.  A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.  To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property.  The Partnership’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved. The Partnership has not recognized an impairment loss since 1995.

 

Accounting Estimates: The preparation of the financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United State of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue Recognition:  Rental income from residential and commercial properties is recognized over the term of the related lease. For residential tenants, amounts 60 days in arrears are charged against income. The commercial tenants are evaluated on a case by case basis. Certain leases of the commercial properties provide for increasing stepped minimum rents, which are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Concessions made on residential leases are also accounted for on the straight-line basis.

 

Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the differences between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed —rate renewal options for below-market leases.  The capitalized above-market lease values for acquired properties are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options of the respective leases.

 

Rental Properties:  Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; improvements and additions are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the asset and related accumulated depreciation is eliminated from the accounts, and any gain or loss on such disposition is included in income. Fully depreciated assets are removed from the accounts. Rental properties are depreciated by both straight-line and accelerated methods over their estimated useful lives. Upon acquisition of rental property, the Partnership estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships.  The Partnership allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values.  The Partnership records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction.  In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Partnership considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate

 

8



Table of Contents

 

discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information.  The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

 

Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Partnership’s overall relationship with the respective tenant.  Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions.  In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.  Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Partnership’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals.  The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases.  The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.

 

In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a rental property may be impaired, an analysis of the value is prepared. The estimated future undiscounted cash flows are compared to the asset’s carrying value to determine if a write-down to fair value is required.

 

Financing and Leasing Fees: Financing fees are capitalized and amortized, using the interest method, over the life of the related mortgages. Leasing fees are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease. Unamortized balances are expensed when the corresponding fee is no longer applicable.

 

Income Taxes: The financial statements have been prepared on the basis that NERA and its subsidiaries are entitled to tax treatment as partnerships. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded.

 

Cash Equivalents: The Partnership considers cash equivalents to be all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less.

 

Segment Reporting: Operating segments are revenue producing components of the Partnership for which separate financial information is produced internally for management. Under the definition, NERA operated, for all periods presented, as one segment.

 

Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income is defined as changes in partners’ equity, exclusive of transactions with owners (such as capital contributions and dividends). NERA did not have any comprehensive income items in 2010 and 2009 other than net income as reported.

 

Income Per Unit: Net income per unit has been calculated based upon the weighted average number of units outstanding during each period presented. The Partnership has no dilutive units and, therefore, basic net income is the same as diluted net income per unit (see Note 7).

 

Concentration of Credit Risks and Financial Instruments: The Partnership’s properties are located in New England and the Partnership is subject to the general economic risks related thereto. No single tenant accounted for more than 5% of the Partnership’s revenues in 2010 or 2009.  The Partnership makes its temporary cash investments with high-credit quality financial institutions. At September 30, 2010, substantially all of the Partnership’s cash and cash equivalents were held in interest-bearing accounts at financial institutions, earning interest at rates from 0.05% to 1.0%.   At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, approximately $5,858,000 and $4,026,000 of cash and cash equivalents, and security deposits included in prepaid expenses and other assets exceeded federally insured amounts.

 

Advertising Expense: Advertising is expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was $57,288 and $58,884 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

Discontinued Operations and Rental Property Held for Sale:  When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Partnership discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of

 

9



Table of Contents

 

such assets. If, in management’s opinion, the net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established. Properties identified as held for sale and/or sold are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Partnership decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.

 

Interest Capitalized: The Partnership follows the policy of capitalizing interest as a component of the cost of rental property when the time of construction exceeds one year. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and year ended December 31, 2009, there was no capitalized interest.

 

Extinguishment of Debt: When existing mortgages are refinanced with the same lender and it is determined that the refinancing is substantially different then they are recorded as an extinguishment of debt.  However if it is determined that the refinancing is substantially the same then they are recorded as an exchange of debt. All refinancings qualify as extinguishment of debt.

 

Reclassifications:  Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform to current period presentation.

 

NOTE 2. RENTAL PROPERTIES

 

As of September 30, 2010, the Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships owned 2,269 residential apartment units in 20 residential and mixed-use complexes (collectively, the “Apartment Complexes”). The Partnership also owns 19 condominium units in a residential condominium complex, all of which are leased to residential tenants (collectively referred to as the “Condominium Units”). The Apartment Complexes and Condominium Units are located primarily in the metropolitan Boston area of Massachusetts.

 

Additionally, as of September 30, 2010, the Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships owned a commercial shopping center in Framingham, commercial buildings in Newton and Brookline and mixed-use properties in Boston, Brockton and Newton, all in Massachusetts. These properties are referred to collectively as the “Commercial Properties.”

 

The Partnership also owned a 40% or 50% ownership interest in nine residential and mixed use complexes (the “Investment Properties”) at September 30, 2010 with a total of 798 residential units, two commercial spaces and one parking lot, accounted for using the equity method of consolidation. See Note 14 for summary information on these investments.

 

Rental properties consist of the following:

 

 

 

September 30, 2010

 

December 31, 2009

 

Useful Life

 

Land, improvements and parking lots

 

$

26,100,616

 

$

26,072,100

 

15—40 years

 

Buildings and improvements

 

111,241,625

 

111,016,179

 

15—40 years

 

Kitchen cabinets

 

4,407,580

 

3,977,528

 

5—10 years

 

Carpets

 

4,058,564

 

3,506,481

 

5—10 years

 

Air conditioning

 

950,546

 

882,354

 

7—10 years

 

Laundry equipment

 

371,096

 

367,209

 

5—7 years

 

Elevators

 

1,021,676

 

984,506

 

20 years

 

Swimming pools

 

157,489

 

157,489

 

10 years

 

Equipment

 

2,222,068

 

2,087,287

 

5—7 years

 

Motor vehicles

 

142,520

 

142,520

 

5 years

 

Fences

 

53,182

 

51,882

 

5—10 years

 

Furniture and fixtures

 

1,138,653

 

1,063,897

 

5—7 years

 

Smoke alarms

 

109,320

 

102,123

 

5—7 years

 

 

 

151,974,935

 

150,411,555

 

 

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(58,635,156

)

(54,439,618

)

 

 

 

 

$

93,339,779

 

$

95,971,937

 

 

 

 

10



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Partnership’s properties are managed by an entity that is owned by the majority shareholder of the General Partner. The management fee is equal to 4% of rental revenue and laundry income on the majority of the Partnership’s properties and 3% on Linewt.  Total management fees paid were approximately $1,022,000 and $1,012,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

The Partnership Agreement permits the General Partner or Management Company to charge the costs of professional services (such as counsel, accountants and contractors) to NERA. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, approximately $506,000 and $597,000 was charged to NERA for legal, accounting, construction, maintenance, rental and architectural services and supervision of capital improvements.  Of the 2010 expenses referred to above, approximately $238,000 consisted of repairs and maintenance and $247,000 of administrative expense. Approximately $21,000 of expenses for construction, architectural services and supervision of capital projects were capitalized in rental properties. Additionally in 2010, the Hamilton Company received approximately $483,000 from the Investment Properties of which approximately $389,000 was the management fee, approximately $ 71,000 was for repairs and maintenance expenses, approximately $18,000 was for administrative expenses and approximately $4,500 was for construction supervision and architectural fees.  The management fee is equal to 4% of rental income at the majority of investment properties and 2% at Dexter Park.

 

On January 1, 2004, all employees were transferred to the Management Company’s payroll. The Partnership reimburses the Management Company for the payroll and related expenses of the employees who work at the properties. Total reimbursement was approximately $2,007,000 and $1,680,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Management Company maintains a 401K plan for all eligible employees whereby the employees may contribute the maximum allowed by law. The plan also provides for discretionary contributions by the employer. There were no employer contributions in 2010 and 2009.

 

Prior to 1991, the Partnership employed an outside, unaffiliated company to perform its bookkeeping and accounting functions. Since that time, such services have been provided by the Management Company’s accounting staff, which consists of approximately 14 people.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Management Company charged the Partnership $93,750 ($125,000 per year) for bookkeeping and accounting services included in administrative expenses of $247,000 above.

 

In 1996, prior to becoming an employee of the Management Company, the President of the Management Company performed asset management consulting services for the Partnership. This individual continues to perform this service and receives an asset management fee from the Partnership.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, this individual received $75,000 which includes a bonus of $25,000, a quarterly fee of $12,500 for the first quarter of 2010, and quarterly fees of $18,750 in the second quarter and third quarters of 2010. Going forward, the quarterly fee payable to this individual will be $18,750.

 

The Partnership has invested in nine limited partnerships, which have invested in mixed use residential apartment complexes. The Partnership has a 40% or 50% ownership interest in each investment. The other investors are Harold Brown, the President of the Management Company and five other employees of the Management Company.  Harold Brown’s ownership interest is between 43.2% and 60%. See Note 14 for a description of the properties and their operations.

 

See Note 8 for information regarding the repurchase of Class B and General Partnership Units.

 

On October 28, 2009, the Partnership borrowed approximately $7,168,000 with an interest rate of 6% from

 

11



Table of Contents

 

HBC Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (“HBC”).  The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand by HBC with six months notice.  As of November 12, 2010, the outstanding balance of principal on this loan was $5,868,600.  On August 17, 2010, HBC gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000.  On October 12, 2010  the Partnership paid HBC $1,300,000 and anticipates paying the balance of the payment demanded of $1,200,000 prior to December 31, 2010. The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBC’s right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice. The interest paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $326,000 and $78,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. This loan is collateralized by the Partnership’s 99% ownership interest in 62 Boylston Street.

 

NOTE 4. OTHER ASSETS

 

Approximately $1,669,000 and $1,426,000 of security deposits are included in prepaid expenses and other assets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The security deposits and escrow accounts are restricted cash.

 

Included in prepaid expenses and other assets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is approximately $858,000 and $829,000, respectively, held in escrow to fund future capital improvements.

 

Financing and leasing fees of approximately $978,000 and $1,066,000 are net of accumulated amortization of approximately $511,000 and $450,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

 

NOTE 5. MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

 

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the mortgages payable consisted of various loans, all of which were secured by first mortgages on properties referred to in Note 2. At September 30, 2010, the fixed interest rates on these loans ranged from 4.84% to 7.07%, payable in monthly installments aggregating approximately $726,000, including principal, to various dates through 2023. The majority of the mortgages are subject to prepayment penalties.  At September 30, 2010, the weighted average interest rate on the above mortgages was 5.55%. The effective rate of 5.63% includes the amortization expense of deferred financing costs. See Note 12 for fair value information.

 

The Partnerships have pledged tenant leases as additional collateral for certain of these loans.

 

Approximate annual maturities at September 30, 2010 are as follows:

 

2011—current maturities

 

$

928,000

 

2012

 

1,009,000

 

2013

 

43,828,000

 

2014

 

7,806,000

 

2015

 

9,032,000

 

Thereafter

 

75,300,000

 

 

 

$

137,903,000

 

 

In December 2009, the Partnership refinanced Linhart, LLP, located in Newton, Massachusetts.  The new loan is $2,000,000, with a rate of 3.75% over the Libor rate or 4.25% whichever is greater and matures five years from the date of closing.  The interest rate as of September 30, 2010 was 4.25%.  The loan agreement calls for interest only payments for twenty four months and principal and interest payments for the remainder of the five year period based on a thirty year amortization.  The loan proceeds were used to pay off the prior loan of approximately $1,700,000, and closing costs of approximately $38,000.

 

On March 25, 2010, the Partnership refinanced the Brookside Apartments.  The new loan is $2,820,000, matures in 2020 and has an interest rate of 5.81%.  The loan is a ten year note however it is being amortized over 30

 

12



Table of Contents

 

years. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay off the old mortgage of approximately $1,900,000.  There were no prepayment penalties.

 

NOTE 6. ADVANCE RENTAL PAYMENTS AND SECURITY DEPOSITS

 

The Partnership’s residential lease agreements may require tenants to maintain a one-month advance rental payment and/or a security deposit. At September 30, 2010, amounts received for prepaid rents of approximately $1,315,000 are included in cash and cash equivalents, and security deposits of approximately $1,670,000 are included in other assets and are restricted cash.

 

NOTE 7. PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

The Partnership has two classes of Limited Partners (Class A and B) and one category of General Partner. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, holders of Class A Units, Class B Units and General Partnership Units must represent 80%, 19% and 1%, respectively, of the total units outstanding.  Holders of a class of Partnership Units have equal profit sharing and distribution rights with all other holders of that class of Partnership Units in proportion to their pro rata interests in such class.

 

In 2010, the Partnership approved quarterly distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) payable on March 31, June 30,  September 30, and December 31, 2010.

 

In 2009, the Partnership paid quarterly distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) in March, June, September, and December for a total distribution of $28.00 per unit ($2.80 per receipt).

 

The Partnership has entered into a deposit agreement with an agent to facilitate public trading of limited partners’ interests in Class A Units. Under the terms of this agreement, the holders of Class A Units have the right to exchange each Class A Unit for 10 Depositary Receipts. The following is information per Depositary Receipt:

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

Net (loss)income per Depositary Receipt

 

$

(1.05

)

$

1.20

 

Distributions per Depositary Receipt

 

$

2.10

 

$

2.10

 

 

NOTE 8. TREASURY UNITS

 

Treasury Units at September 30, 2010 are as follows:

 

Class A

 

38,993

 

Class B

 

9,260

 

General Partnership

 

488

 

 

 

48,741

 

 

On August 20, 2007, NewReal, Inc., the General Partner authorized an equity repurchase program (“Repurchase Program”) under which the Partnership was permitted to purchase, over a period of twelve months, up to 100,000 Depositary Receipts (each of which is one-tenth of a Class A Unit).  On January 15, 2008, the General Partner authorized an increase in the Repurchase Program from 100,000 to 200,000 Depositary Receipts. On January 30, 2008 the General Partner authorized an increase the Repurchase Program from 200,000 to 300,000 Depositary Receipts.  On March 6, 2008, the General Partner authorized the increase in the total number of Depositary Receipts that could be repurchased pursuant to the Repurchase Program from 300,000 to 500,000.  On August 8, 2008, the General Partner re-authorized and renewed the Repurchase Program for an additional 12-month period ended August 19, 2009.  On March 22, 2010, the General Partner re-authorized and renewed the Repurchase Program that expired on August 19, 2009.  Under the terms of the renewed Repurchase Program, the Partnership may purchase up to 500,000 Depositary Receipts from the start of the program in 2007 through March 31, 2015. The Repurchase Program

 

13



Table of Contents

 

requires the Partnership to repurchase a proportionate number of Class B Units and General Partner Units in connection with any repurchases of any Depositary Receipts by the Partnership based upon the 80%, 19% and 1% fixed distribution percentages of the holders of the Class A, Class B and General Partner Units under the Partnership’s Second Amended and Restate Contract of Limited Partnership.  Repurchases of Depositary Receipts or Partnership Units pursuant to the Repurchase Program may be made by the Partnership from time to time in its sole discretion in open market transactions or in privately negotiated transactions.  From August 20, 2007 through September 30, 2010, the Partnership has repurchased 398,320 Depositary Receipts at an average price of $73.59 per receipt (or $735.90 per underlying Class A Unit), 1,724 Class B Units and 91 General Partnership Units, both at an average price of $585.05 per Unit, totaling approximately $30,480,000 including brokerage fees paid by the Partnership.

 

On September 17, 2008, the Partnership completed the issuance of an aggregate of 6,642 Class A Units held in treasury to current holders of Class B and General Partner Units upon the simultaneous retirement to treasury of 6,309 Class B Units and 333 General Partner Units pursuant to an equity distribution plan authorized by the Board of Directors of the General Partner on August 8, 2008 and as further described under Item 3.02 of the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference. Harold Brown, the treasurer of the General Partner, owns 75% of the issued and outstanding Class B Units of the Partnership and 75% of the issued and outstanding equity of the General Partner, Ronald Brown, the brother of Harold Brown and the president of the General Partner, owns 25% of the issued and outstanding Class B Units of the Partnership and 25% of the issued and outstanding equity of the General Partner.

 

On January 18, 2008, 113,518 Depositary Receipts included above became available to purchase at a price of $75.50 per receipt. In order for the Partnership to take advantage of this opportunity, the Partnership borrowed $5,285,000 from Harold Brown, the Treasurer of the General Partner. This loan was paid in full, with interest at 6% of $37,899, on February 29, 2008.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the Partnership repurchased 6,896 depositary receipts for $432,920, 164 Class B Units for $102,591 and 9 General Partnership Units for $5,400.  The Partnership did not repurchase any depositary receipts or Units during the three months ended September 30, 2010.

 

NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

From time to time, the Partnerships are involved in various ordinary routine litigation incidental to their business. The Partnership either has insurance coverage or provides for any uninsured claims when appropriate. The Partnerships are not involved in any material pending legal proceedings.

 

NOTE 10. RENTAL INCOME

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, approximately 90% of rental income was related to residential apartments and condominium units with leases of one year or less. Approximately 10% was related to commercial properties, which have minimum future annual rental income on non-cancellable operating leases at September 30, 2010 as follows:

 

 

 

Commercial
Property Leases

 

2011

 

$

2,838,000

 

2012

 

2,377,000

 

2013

 

1,858,000

 

2014

 

1,605,000

 

2015

 

1,071,000

 

Thereafter

 

1,209,000

 

 

 

$

10,958,000

 

 

The aggregate minimum future rental income does not include contingent rentals that may be received under various leases in connection with percentage rents, common area charges and real estate taxes. Aggregate contingent

 

14



Table of Contents

 

rentals from continuing operations were approximately $490,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and approximately $583,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

Rents receivable are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $785,000 at September 30, 2010 and $476,000 at December 31, 2009.  Included in rents receivable at September 30, 2010 is approximately $332,000 resulting from recognizing rental income from non-cancelable commercial leases with future rental increases on a straight-line basis.  The majority of this amount is for long-term leases with Staples and Trader Joe’s at Staples Plaza in Framingham, Massachusetts.

 

Rents receivable also includes approximately $168,000 representing the straight-line of rental concessions.

 

In 2010, rent at the commercial properties includes approximately $8,500 of amortization of deferred rents arising from the fair values assigned to in-place leases upon the purchase of Cypress Street in Brookline, Massachusetts.

 

NOTE 11. CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, cash paid for interest was approximately $6,141,000, and $5,886,000 respectively.

 

NOTE 12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis

 

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we do not have any significant financial assets or financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in our consolidated financial statements.

 

Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value

 

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and note payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments or, the recent acquisition of these items.

 

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we estimated the fair value of our mortgages payable and other notes based upon quoted market prices for the same (Level 1) or similar (Level 2) issues when current quoted market prices are available.  We estimated the fair value of our secured mortgage debt that does not have current quoted market prices available by discounting the future cash flows using rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and maturities (Level 3).  The differences in the fair value of our debt from the carrying value are the result of differences in interest rates and/or borrowing spreads that were available to us at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, as compared with those in effect when the debt was issued or acquired.  The secured mortgage debt contain pre-payment penalties or yield maintenance provisions that could make the cost of refinancing the debt at lower rates exceed the benefit that would be derived from doing so.

 

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Partnership in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:

 

·                  For cash and cash equivalents, other assets, investment in partnerships, accounts payable, advance rents and security deposits: fair value approximates the carrying value of such assets and liabilities.

 

·                  For mortgage notes payable: fair value is generally based on estimated future cash flows, which are discounted using the quoted market rate from an independent source for similar obligations. Refer to the table below for the carrying amount and estimated fair value of such instruments.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

The following table reflects the carrying amounts and estimated fair value of our debt.

 

 

 

Carrying Amount

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

Mortgage Notes Payable

 

 

 

 

 

Partnership Properties

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30, 2010

 

$

137,903,103

 

$

149,087,821

 

At December 31, 2009

 

$

137,641,354

 

$

139,997,718

 

Investment Properties

 

 

 

 

 

At September 30, 2010

 

$

141,013,383

 

$

150,721,122

 

 

Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since December 31, 2009 and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

 

NOTE 13. TAXABLE INCOME AND TAX BASIS

 

Taxable income reportable by the Partnership and includable in its partners’ tax returns is different than financial statement income because of a tax free exchanges, accelerated depreciation, different tax lives, and timing differences related to prepaid rents, allowances and intangible assets at significant acquisitions. Taxable income was approximately $300,000 greater than statement income for the year ended December 31, 2009 and approximately $7,500,000 less than statement income for the year ended December 31, 2008. The cumulative tax basis of the Partnership’s real estate at December 31, 2009 is approximately $5,200,000 less than the statement basis. The primary reason for the lower tax basis is the acquisition of Linewt and Cypress Street utilizing tax free exchanges in 2008. The Partnership’s tax basis in its joint venture investments is approximately $1,500,000 greater than statement basis.   Taxable loss for 2010 is estimated to be approximately $200,000 greater than the financial statement loss due to depreciation provisions enacted in the 2010 Tax Act..  Certain entities included in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements are subject to certain state taxes.  These taxes are not significant and are recorded as operating expenses in the accompanying consolidates financial statements.

 

The Partnership adopted the amended provisions related to uncertain tax provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes.  As a result of the implementation of the guidance, the Partnership recognized no material adjustments regarding its tax accounting treatment.  The Partnership expects to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense, which would be included in general and administrative expense.

 

In the normal course of business the Partnership or one of its subsidiaries is subject to examination by federal, state and local jurisdictions in which it operates, where applicable.  As of September 30, 2010, the tax years that remain subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions under the statute of limitations is from the year 2003 forward.

 

NOTE 14. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES

 

Since November 2001, the Partnership has invested in nine limited partnerships and limited liability companies, the majority of which have invested in residential apartment complexes, with three partnerships investing in commercial property. The Partnership has between a 40%- 50% ownership interests in each investment. The other investors are Harold Brown, the President of the Management Company and five other employees of the Management Company. Harold Brown’s ownership interest is between 43.2% and 60%, with the balance owned by the others. A description of each investment is as follows:

 

On October 28, 2009 the Partnership invested approximately $15,925,000 in a joint venture to acquire a 40% interest in a residential property located in Brookline, Massachusetts.  The property, referred to as Dexter Park, is a 409 unit residential complex. The purchase price was $129,500,000.  The total mortgage is $89,914,000 with an interest rate of 5.57% and it matures in 2019.  The mortgage calls for interest only payments for the first two years of the loan and amortized over 30 years thereafter.  In order to fund this investment, the Partnership used approximately $8,757,000 of its cash reserves and borrowed approximately $7,168,000 with an interest rate of 6% from HBC

 

16



Table of Contents

 

Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (“HBC”).  The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand by HBC with six months notice.  As of November 12, 2010, the outstanding balance of principal on this loan was $5,868,600.  On August 17, 2010, HBC gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000. On October 12, 2010, the Partnership paid HBC $1,300,000 and anticipates paying the balance of the payment demanded of $1,200,000 prior to December 31, 2010. The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBC’s right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice. The interest paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $326,000 and $78,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. This loan is collateralized by the Partnership’s 99% ownership interest in 62 Boylston Street.  A majority of the apartments were leased at the time of the acquisition.  As a result, the Partnership is amortizing the intangible assets associated with the “in place” leases over a 12 month period which began in November 2009.  The total monthly amortization is approximately $407,000 which at 40% reduces the Partnership’s income by approximately $163,000 per month. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the total amortization in connection with these leases is approximately $3,663,000, of which the Partnership’s share is approximately $1,465,000.  In November 2010, the intangible assets will be fully amortized which will result in lower amortization expense.   This investment, Hamilton Park Towers, LLC is referred to as Dexter Park.

 

On October 3, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,500,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 168-unit apartment complex in Quincy, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $30,875,000. The Partnership plans to sell the majority of units as condominium and retain 48 units for long-term investment. Gains from the sales of units will be taxed at ordinary income rates (approximately $47,000 per unit). In February 2007, the Partnership refinanced the 48 units which will be retained with a new mortgage in the amount of $4,750,000 with an interest rate of 5.57%, interest only for five years. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Bay Apartments, LLC. The loan will be amortized over 30 years thereafter and matures in March 2017. In April 2008, the Partnership refinanced an additional 20 units and obtained a new mortgage in the amount of $2,368,000 with interest at 5.75%, interest only, which matures in 2013.  As of October 26, 2010, the Partnership sold 105 units, the proceeds of which went to pay down the mortgage on the property.  The balance on the new mortgage is approximately $1,668,000 at September 30, 2010. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Bay, LLC.

 

On March 7, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,000,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a building comprising 49 apartments, one commercial space and a 50-car surface parking lot located in Boston, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $14,300,000, with a $10,750,000 mortgage. The Partnership plans to operate the building and initiate development of the parking lot.  In June 2007, the Partnership separated the parcels, formed an additional limited liability company for the residential apartments and obtained a mortgage on the property. The new limited liability company formed for the residential apartments and commercial space is referred to as Hamilton Essex 81, LLC.  In August 2008, the Partnership restructured the mortgages on both parcels at Essex 81 and transferred the residential apartments to Hamilton Essex 81, LLC.  The mortgage on Hamilton Essex 81, LLC is $8,600,000 with interest only at 5.79% due in August 2015.  The mortgage on Essex Development, LLC, or the parking lot is $2,162,000 with a variable interest rate of 2.25% over the daily Libor rate (0.26% at September 30, 2010) and is due in August 2011.  Harold Brown has issued a personal guaranty up to $1,000,000 of this mortgage. In the event that he is obligated to make payments to the lender as a result of this guaranty, the Partnership and other investors have, in turn, agreed to indemnify him for their proportionate share of any such payments.  The investment in the parking lot is referred to as Hamilton Essex Development, LLC; the investment in the apartments is referred to as Hamilton Essex 81, LLC.

 

On March 2, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,352,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 176-unit apartment complex with an additional small commercial building located in Quincy, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $23,750,000. The Partnership sold 127 of the units as condominiums and retained 49 units for long-term investment. The Partnership obtained a new 10-year mortgage in the amount of $5,000,000 on the units to be retained by the Partnership. The interest on the new loan is 5.67% fixed for the 10 year term with interest only payments for five years and amortized over a 30 year period for the balance of the loan term.   This investment is referred to as Hamilton 1025, LLC.

 

In September 2004, the Partnership invested approximately $5,075,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 42-unit apartment complex located in Lexington, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $10,100,000. In October 

 

17



Table of Contents

 

2004, the Partnership obtained a mortgage on the property in the amount of $8,025,000 and returned $3,775,000 to the Partnership. The Partnership obtained a new 10-year mortgage in the amount of $5,500,000 in January 2007. The interest on the new loan is 5.67% fixed for the ten year term with interest only payments for five years and amortized over a 30 year period for the balance of the loan. This loan required a cash contribution by the Partnership of $1,250,000 in December 2006. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Minuteman, LLC.

 

In August 2004, the Partnership invested $8,000,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 280-unit apartment complex located in Watertown, Massachusetts. The total purchase price was $56,000,000. As of May 2008, the Partnership sold 137 units as condominiums. Gains from these sales were taxed as ordinary income (approximately $50,000 per unit). The majority of the sales proceeds were applied to reduce the mortgage with the final payment made during the second quarter of 2007. With the sale of the units and the payments of the liabilities, the assets were combined with Hamilton on Main Apartments, LLC.  An entity partially owned by the majority shareholder of the General Partner and the President of the management company, 31% and 5%, respectively, was the sales agent and received a variable commission on each sale of 3% to 5%. Hamilton on Main, LLC is known as Hamilton Place.

 

In 2005, Hamilton on Main Apartments, LLC obtained a ten year mortgage on the three buildings to be retained. The mortgage is $16,825,000, with interest only of 5.18% for three years and amortizing on a 30 year schedule for the remaining seven years when the balance is due. The net proceeds after funding escrow accounts and closing costs on the mortgage were approximately $16,700,000, which were used to reduce the existing mortgage. Hamilton on Main LLC paid a fee of approximately $400,000 in connection with this early extinguishment of debt.  At September 30, 2010, the remaining balance on the mortgage is approximately $16,214,000.

 

In November 2001, the Partnership invested approximately $1,533,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 40-unit apartment building in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This property has a 12-year mortgage, with a remaining balance at September 30, 2010 of approximately $7,215,000 at 6.9% which is amortized on a 30-year schedule, with a final payment of approximately $6,000,000 in 2014. This investment is referred to as 345 Franklin, LLC.

 

As required by the lender, the Treasurer of the General Partner has provided a limited repayment guaranty equal to fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding balance for the loan on the for sale units at Hamilton Bay and a limited guaranty of $1,000,000 for the loan on Hamilton Essex Development.  In the event that he is obligated to make payments to the lenders as a result of these guaranties, the Partnership and other investors have, in turn, agreed to indemnify him for their proportionate share of any such payments.

 

Summary financial information as of September 30, 2010

 

 

 

Hamilton
Essex 81

 

Hamilton
Essex 
Development

 

345 
Franklin

 

Hamilton 
1025

 

Hamilton 
Bay Sales

 

Hamilton 
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton
Minuteman

 

Hamilton 
on Main

 

Dexter Park

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties

 

9,923,795

 

2,592,854

 

8,740,174

 

6,141,924

 

2,027,793

 

7,657,273

 

7,632,705

 

23,058,216

 

119,788,836

 

187,563,571

 

Cash & Cash Equivalents

 

471

 

5,759

 

3,894

 

4,527

 

32,165

 

38,884

 

90,609

 

84,990

 

723,378

 

984,677

 

Rent Receivable

 

37,056

 

 

3,815

 

6,422

 

3,604

 

2,333

 

1,693

 

10,154

 

252,374

 

317,450

 

Real Estate Tax Escrow

 

80,093

 

 

37,691

 

24,754

 

 

80,659

 

33,905

 

97,895

 

433,243

 

788,240

 

Prepaid Expenses & Other Assets

 

88,057

 

768

 

94,723

 

107,925

 

229,161

 

91,780

 

70,758

 

415,367

 

1,420,411

 

2,518,951

 

Financing & Leasing Fees

 

101,903

 

5,738

 

26,537

 

30,955

 

12,900

 

40,557

 

24,879

 

30,019

 

533,224

 

806,713

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

10,231,375

 

2,605,120

 

8,906,835

 

6,316,507

 

2,305,623

 

7,911,486

 

7,854,549

 

23,696,641

 

123,151,467

 

192,979,603

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage Notes Payable

 

8,591,089

 

2,162,000

 

7,214,588

 

5,000,000

 

1,668,000

 

4,750,000

 

5,500,000

 

16,213,706

 

89,914,000

 

141,013,383

 

Accounts Payable& Accrued Exp

 

52,813

 

6,285

 

96,086

 

80,185

 

15,555

 

8,678

 

86,385

 

203,577

 

751,422

 

1,300,986

 

Advance Rental Payments & Security Deposits

 

126,925

 

 

111,349

 

64,193

 

20,224

 

79,018

 

62,199

 

228,928

 

1,632,665

 

2,325,500

 

Total Liabilities

 

8,770,827

 

2,168,285

 

7,422,022

 

5,144,378

 

1,703,779

 

4,837,696

 

5,648,584

 

16,646,211

 

92,298,087

 

144,639,869

 

Partners’ Capital

 

1,460,548

 

436,835

 

1,484,813

 

1,172,129

 

601,844

 

3,073,790

 

2,205,965

 

7,050,430

 

30,853,380

 

48,339,734

 

Total Liabilities and Capital

 

10,231,375

 

2,605,120

 

8,906,835

 

6,316,507

 

2,305,623

 

7,911,486

 

7,854,549

 

23,696,641

 

123,151,467

 

192,979,603

 

Partners’ Capital NERA 50%

 

730,274

 

218,418

 

742,407

 

586,065

 

300,922

 

1,536,895

 

1,102,982

 

3,525,215

 

 

 

8,743,177

 

NERA 40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,341,352

 

12,341,352

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,084,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total units/condominiums

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apartments

 

48

 

 

40

 

175

 

120

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

409

 

1,030

 

Commercial

 

1

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Total

 

49

 

1

 

40

 

176

 

120

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

409

 

1,033

 

Units to be retained

 

49

 

1

 

40

 

49

 

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

409

 

786

 

Units to be sold

 

 

 

 

127

 

120

 

 

 

 

 

247

 

Units sold through Oct. 26, 2010

 

 

 

 

127

 

105

 

 

 

 

 

232

 

Unsold units

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

Unsold units with deposits for future sale as of Oct. 26, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18


 


Table of Contents

 

Summary financial information for the nine months ended September 30, 2010

 

 

 

Hamilton 
Essex 81

 

Hamilton 
Essex 
Development

 

345 
Franklin

 

Hamilton 
1025

 

Hamilton Bay
Sales

 

Hamilton 
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton 
Minuteman

 

Hamilton on
Main

 

Dexter Park

 

Total

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

845,971

 

207,000

 

816,136

 

590,388

 

165,092

 

628,658

 

574,388

 

1,834,731

 

8,213,675

 

13,876,041

 

Laundry and Sundry Income

 

11,664

 

 

1,751

 

 

 

 

265

 

15,040

 

71,488

 

100,207

 

 

 

857,636

 

207,000

 

817,888

 

590,388

 

165,092

 

628,658

 

574,652

 

1,849,771

 

8,285,163

 

13,976,248

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

10,305

 

(643

)

27,851

 

7,718

 

4,319

 

11,714

 

7,003

 

30,175

 

120,222

 

218,664

 

Depreciation and Amortization

 

319,980

 

4,690

 

330,567

 

202,510

 

72,096

 

268,819

 

241,303

 

737,678

 

7,650,129

 

9,827,772

 

Management Fees

 

34,660

 

8,280

 

33,579

 

23,751

 

6,940

 

24,914

 

23,784

 

73,507

 

181,549

 

410,964

 

Operating

 

102,208

 

(137

)

46,470

 

1,207

 

(138

)

313

 

46,963

 

259,188

 

682,040

 

1,138,114

 

Renting

 

23,007

 

 

41,425

 

3,104

 

200

 

3,698

 

3,185

 

14,166

 

214,696

 

303,482

 

Repairs and Maintenance

 

109,000

 

 

61,470

 

255,649

 

63,716

 

281,938

 

67,484

 

253,745

 

675,397

 

1,768,399

 

Taxes and Insurance

 

137,142

 

35,711

 

73,680

 

95,499

 

32,000

 

94,888

 

76,238

 

238,815

 

1,108,115

 

1,890,088

 

 

 

736,302

 

47,901

 

614,843

 

589,436

 

179,132

 

686,284

 

465,960

 

1,607,274

 

10,630,148

 

15,557,280

 

Income (Loss)Before Other Income

 

121,334

 

159,099

 

203,045

 

953

 

(14,040

)

(57,626

)

108,692

 

242,497

 

(2,344,985

)

(1,581,033

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Income

 

2

 

1

 

35

 

68

 

9,239

 

 

2

 

5

 

5

 

9,358

 

Interest Expense

 

(329,724

)

(46,879

)

(379,392

)

(216,150

)

(73,224

)

(203,035

)

(237,346

)

(644,832

)

(3,827,225

)

(6,007,808

)

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

 

 

 

 

 

195

 

9,478

 

 

 

 

9,673

 

Other Income (Expenses)

 

 

 

 

 

7,526

 

 

 

2,168

 

(17,720

)

(8,026

)

 

 

(379,722)

 

(46,877

)

(379,357

)

(216,082

)

(56,264

)

(193,556

)

(237,346

)

(642,659

)

(3,844,940

)

(5,996,803

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

 

(258,388

)

112,222

 

(176,313

)

(215,129

)

(70,305

)

(251,182

)

(128,654

)

(400,162

)

(6,189,926

)

(7,577,838

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss - NERA 50%

 

(129,194

)

56,111

 

(88,157

)

(107,565

)

(35,152

)

(125,591

)

(64,326

)

(200,081

)

 

 

(693,955

)

NERA 40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,475,970

)

(2,475,970

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,169,925

)

 

19



Table of Contents

 

Summary financial information for the three months ended September 30, 2010

 

 

 

Hamilton

 

Hamilton Essex

 

345

 

Hamilton

 

Hamilton

 

Hamilton

 

Hamilton

 

Hamilton

 

Dexter

 

 

 

 

 

Essex 81

 

Development

 

Franklin

 

1025

 

Bay Sales

 

Bay Apts

 

Minuteman

 

on Main

 

Park

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

278,486

 

69,000

 

264,268

 

192,019

 

58,152

 

210,543

 

193,368

 

611,382

 

2,591,295

 

4,468,513

 

Laundry and Sundry Income

 

3,838

 

 

 

1,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,383

 

22,704

 

31,974

 

 

 

282,323

 

69,000

 

265,318

 

192,019

 

58,152

 

210,543

 

193,368

 

615,766

 

2,613,999

 

4,500,488

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

2,583

 

(477

)

8,879

 

4,032

 

1,739

 

3,638

 

1,641

 

8,385

 

44,138

 

74,557

 

Depreciation and Amortization

 

106,978

 

1,563

 

110,916

 

67,670

 

24,032

 

89,752

 

81,044

 

246,762

 

2,558,400

 

3,287,118

 

Management Fees

 

10,485

 

2,760

 

10,158

 

8,016

 

2,258

 

8,355

 

7,840

 

24,459

 

61,045

 

135,374

 

Operating

 

30,766

 

 

 

15,839

 

260

 

 

 

 

 

10,867

 

78,033

 

191,189

 

326,954

 

Renting

 

12,594

 

 

 

6,325

 

136

 

 

 

1,655

 

1,293

 

5,199

 

91,410

 

118,612

 

Repairs and Maintenance

 

40,964

 

 

 

32,297

 

128,982

 

13,587

 

62,668

 

28,065

 

81,201

 

295,524

 

683,288

 

Taxes and Insurance

 

42,780

 

11,467

 

23,114

 

32,076

 

10,476

 

19,623

 

25,737

 

79,282

 

339,298

 

583,854

 

 

 

247,151

 

15,313

 

207,528

 

241,172

 

52,091

 

185,691

 

156,488

 

523,321

 

3,581,003

 

5,209,758

 

Income Before Other Income

 

35,172

 

53,687

 

57,790

 

(49,153

)

6,061

 

24,852

 

36,880

 

92,445

 

(967,004

)

(709,270

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Income

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

22

 

2,929

 

 

 

1

 

1

 

 

 

2,965

 

Interest Expense

 

(127,875

)

(15,936

)

(125,815

)

(72,833

)

(24,686

)

(68,408

)

(79,974

)

(216,444

)

(1,304,571

)

(2,036,541

)

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

195

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

195

 

Other Income (Expenses)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(195

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(17,720

)

(17,915

)

 

 

(127,875

)

(15,936

)

(125,804

)

(72,810

)

(21,757

)

(68,408

)

(79,973

)

(216,443

)

(1,322,291

)

(2,051,295

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

 

(92,703

)

37,751

 

(68,014

)

(121,963

)

(15,697

)

(43,555

)

(43,093

)

(123,998

)

(2,289,296

)

(2,760,565

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P&L- NERA 50%

 

(46,351

)

18,875

 

(34,007

)

(60,982

)

(7,848

)

(21,778

)

(21,546

)

(61,998

)

 

 

(235,635

)

P&L- NERA 40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(915,718

)

(915,718

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,151,353

)

 

Future annual mortgage maturities at September 30, 2010 are as follows:

 

 

 

Hamilton 
Essex 81

 

Hamilton 
Essex 
Development

 

345
Franklin

 

Hamilton
1025

 

Hamilton 
Bay Sales

 

Hamilton 
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton 
Minuteman

 

Hamilton on
Main

 

Dexter
Park

 

 

 

Period End

 

March 
2005

 

March
2005

 

November 
2001

 

March
2005

 

October
2005

 

October
2005

 

August
2004

 

August 2004

 

October 
2009

 

Total

 

September 30, 2011

 

110,346

 

2,162,000

 

155,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

258,461

 

 

 

2.685,825

 

September 30, 2012

 

116,907

 

 

 

166,060

 

50,135

 

 

 

36,421

 

49,966

 

274,760

 

1,093,540

 

1,787,790

 

September 30, 2013

 

123,859

 

 

 

177,887

 

64,222

 

1,668,000

 

65,250

 

70,339

 

289,543

 

1,258,232

 

3,717,332

 

September 30, 2014

 

131,223

 

 

 

6,715,623

 

68,013

 

 

 

68,979

 

74,491

 

305,121

 

1,330,133

 

8,693,582

 

September 30, 2015

 

8,108,754

 

 

 

 

 

72,028

 

 

 

72,921

 

78,887

 

15,085,823

 

1,406,143

 

24,824,555

 

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,745,602

 

 

 

4,506,429

 

5,226,317

 

 

 

84,825,952

 

99,304,299

 

 

 

8,591,089

 

2,162,000

 

7,214,588

 

5,000,000

 

1,668,000

 

4,750,000

 

5,500,000

 

16,213,706

 

89,914,000

 

141,013,383

 

 

20



Table of Contents

 

Summary balance sheet as of September 30, 2009

 

 

 

Hamilton 
Essex 81

 

Hamilton 
Essex 
Development

 

345 
Franklin

 

Hamilton 
1025

 

Hamilton
Bay Sales

 

Hamilton
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton 
Minuteman

 

Hamilton
on Main

 

Total

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties

 

10,304,195

 

2,576,552

 

9,121,848

 

6,406,791

 

2,111,056

 

8,007,066

 

7,964,514

 

24,125,422

 

70,617,444

 

Cash & Cash Equivalents

 

3,959

 

13,547

 

872

 

3,432

 

12,595

 

526

 

25,485

 

47,376

 

107,791

 

Rent Receivable

 

261

 

 

 

2,893

 

 

 

(4,044

)

6,358

 

5,468

 

Real Estate Tax Escrow

 

62,575

 

 

36,908

 

25,490

 

 

63,274

 

51,624

 

97,881

 

337,751

 

Due From Investment Properties

 

80,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

100,000

 

24,000

 

 

222,000

 

496,000

 

Prepaid Expenses & Other Assets

 

78,558

 

796

 

85,015

 

79,725

 

273,366

 

63,860

 

65,947

 

319,002

 

966,268

 

Financing & Leasing Fees

 

125,095

 

11,992

 

34,703

 

35,981

 

17,965

 

46,919

 

28,848

 

36,881

 

338,383

 

Total Assets

 

10,654,642

 

2,602,888

 

9,279,346

 

6,624,313

 

2,514,982

 

8,205,644

 

8,132,373

 

24,854,920

 

72,869,106

 

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage Notes Payable

 

8,600,000

 

2,162,000

 

7,359,299

 

5,000,000

 

1,668,000

 

4,750,000

 

5,500,000

 

16,461,242

 

51,500,542

 

Due to Investment Properties

 

 

 

 

417,000

 

 

28,000

 

26,000

 

25,000

 

 

496,000

 

Accounts Payable & Accrued Expense

 

47,890

 

9,783

 

129,135

 

15,283

 

22,232

 

14,747

 

49,571

 

201,294

 

489,936

 

Advance Rental Pymts & Security Dep

 

135,068

 

 

124,457

 

55,496

 

15,886

 

78,620

 

49,269

 

203,408

 

662,205

 

Total Liabilities

 

8,782,958

 

2,171,783

 

8,029,891

 

5,070,779

 

1,734,119

 

4,869,367

 

5,623,840

 

16,865,945

 

53,148,682

 

Partners’ Capital

 

1,871,683

 

431,105

 

1,249,455

 

1,553,533

 

780,863

 

3,336,277

 

2,508,532

 

7,988,975

 

19,720,424

 

Total Liabilities & Capital

 

10,654,642

 

2,602,888

 

9,279,346

 

6,624,313

 

2,514,982

 

8,205,644

 

8,132,373

 

24,854,920

 

72,869,106

 

Partners’ Capital-NERA50%

 

935,842

 

215,552

 

624,727

 

776,767

 

390,432

 

1,668,139

 

1,254,266

 

3,994,487

 

9,860,212

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total units/condominiums

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apartments

 

48

 

 

40

 

175

 

120

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

621

 

Commercial

 

1

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Total

 

49

 

1

 

40

 

176

 

120

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

624

 

Units to be retained

 

49

 

1

 

40

 

49

 

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

377

 

Units to be sold

 

 

 

 

127

 

120

 

 

 

 

247

 

Units sold through October 26, 2009

 

 

 

 

127

 

105

 

 

 

 

232

 

Unsold units

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

15

 

Unsold units with deposits for future sale as of October 26, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21



Table of Contents

 

Summary financial information for the nine months ended September 30, 2009

 

 

 

Hamilton 
Essex 81

 

Hamilton Essex
Development

 

345 
Franklin

 

Hamilton 
1025

 

Hamilton
Bay Sales

 

Hamilton
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton 
Minuteman

 

Hamilton
on Main

 

Total

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

839,738

 

214,248

 

820,442

 

596,044

 

171,391

 

602,117

 

571,656

 

1,805,764

 

5,621,400

 

Laundry and Sundry Income

 

2,129

 

 

1,341

 

 

 

 

567

 

16,265

 

20,302

 

 

 

841,868

 

214,248

 

821,782

 

596,044

 

171,391

 

602,117

 

572,223

 

1,822,029

 

5,641,703

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

12,620

 

12,157

 

17,056

 

18,142

 

7,332

 

12,363

 

7,454

 

27,332

 

114,458

 

Depreciation and Amortization

 

324,135

 

3,483

 

326,096

 

234,872

 

79,602

 

299,197

 

344,364

 

1,125,466

 

2,737,213

 

Management Fees

 

35,472

 

8,301

 

33,246

 

23,470

 

6,775

 

23,734

 

22,089

 

73,464

 

226,551

 

Operating

 

101,052

 

 

46,074

 

3,185

 

415

 

3,915

 

61,489

 

252,105

 

468.236

 

Renting

 

29,350

 

 

34,795

 

4,141

 

369

 

1,584

 

3,337

 

11,717

 

85,294

 

Repairs and Maintenance

 

83,989

 

3,930

 

80,008

 

197,010

 

44,391

 

194,281

 

56,424

 

219,761

 

879,795

 

Taxes and Insurance

 

102,155

 

55,381

 

59,989

 

96,836

 

34,629

 

102,652

 

76,349

 

225,972

 

753,962

 

 

 

688,774

 

83,252

 

597,265

 

577,655

 

173,514

 

637,726

 

571,506

 

1,935,816

 

5,265,508

 

Income Before Other Income

 

153,094

 

130,996

 

224,517

 

18,389

 

(2,123

)

(35,610

)

717

 

(113,787

)

376,195

 

Other Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Expense

 

(380,094

)

(48,369

)

(386,837

)

(216,120

)

(75,518

)

(202,915

)

(237,305

)

(654,846

)

(2,202,004

)

Interest Income

 

2

 

 

43

 

54

 

11,035

 

 

1

 

2

 

11,137

 

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

 

 

 

 

 

52,867

 

 

 

 

52,867

 

 

 

(380,092

)

(48,369

)

(386,794

)

(216,065

)

(11,616

)

(202,915

)

(237,304

)

(654,844

)

(2,138,000

)

Net Income (Loss)

 

(226,998

)

82,628

 

(162,277

)

(197,676

)

(13,739

)

(238,525

)

(236,587

)

(768,631

)

(1,761,806

)

Net Income (loss)—NERA 50%

 

(113,499

)

41,314

 

(81,139

)

(98,838

)

(6,869

)

(119,262

)

(118,293

)

(384,316

)

(880,903

)

 

Summary financial information for the three months ended September 30, 2009

 

 

 

Hamilton 
Essex 81

 

Hamilton 
Essex 
Development

 

345 
Franklin

 

Hamilton 
1025

 

Hamilton
Bay Sales

 

Hamilton
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton 
Minuteman

 

Hamilton
on Main

 

Total

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

231,232

 

65,950

 

261,486

 

192,111

 

57,414

 

202,201

 

193,671

 

602,926

 

1,806,989

 

Laundry and Sundry Income

 

237

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,100

 

5,385

 

 

 

231,469

 

65,950

 

261,533

 

192,111

 

57,414

 

202,201

 

193,671

 

608,026

 

1,812,374

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

4,299

 

2,406

 

5,888

 

9,103

 

3,156

 

4,408

 

1,275

 

10,589

 

41,123

 

Depreciation and Amortization

 

108,024

 

1,563

 

112,858

 

78,723

 

26,534

 

100,040

 

115,607

 

376,095

 

919,445

 

Management Fees

 

10,530

 

2,760

 

10,655

 

7,447

 

2,298

 

8,162

 

7,781

 

24,093

 

73,726

 

Operating

 

30,789

 

 

14,394

 

1,777

 

285

 

198

 

14,768

 

65,404

 

127,613

 

Renting

 

13,850

 

 

12,245

 

1,143

 

369

 

774

 

722

 

4,353

 

33,456

 

Repairs and Maintenance

 

31,989

 

 

40,489

 

64,413

 

14,515

 

62,781

 

18,030

 

82,979

 

315,195

 

Taxes and Insurance

 

40,170

 

11,082

 

20,304

 

21,311

 

10,565

 

16,497

 

25,669

 

76,276

 

221,875

 

 

 

239,651

 

17,811

 

216,832

 

183,916

 

57,722

 

192,861

 

183,852

 

639,789

 

1,732,434

 

Income Before Other Income

 

(8,182

)

48,139

 

44,701

 

8,194

 

(308

)

9,340

 

9,819

 

(31,764

)

79,940

 

Other Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Expense

 

(128,179

)

(15,737

)

(128,355

)

(72,805

)

(24,681

)

(68,399

)

(79,957

)

(219,837

)

(737,951

)

Interest Income

 

 

 

14

 

20

 

3,525

 

 

 

 

3,559

 

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

 

 

 

 

 

3,221

 

 

 

 

3,221

 

 

 

(128,179

)

(15,737

)

(128,341

)

(72,785

)

(17,936

)

(68,399

)

(79,957

)

(219,837

)

(731,170

)

Net Income (Loss)

 

(136,361

)

32,403

 

(83,640

)

(64,591

)

(18,244

)

(59,059

)

(70,138

)

(251,601

)

(651,230

)

Net Income (loss)—NERA 50%

 

(68,181

)

16,201

 

(41,820

)

(32,295

)

(9,122

)

(29,530

)

(35,069

)

(125,800

)

(325,615

)

 

22


 


Table of Contents

 

NOTE 15. IMPACT OF RECENTLY-ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810), Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary — a Scope Clarification

 

The objective of this Update is to address implementation issues related to the changes in ownership provisions in the Consolidation — Overall Subtopic (Subtopic 810-10) of FASB Accounting Standards Codification, originally issued as FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.  Subtopic 810-10 establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for noncontrolling interests and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary.  An entity is required to deconsolidate a subsidiary when the entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary.  Upon deconsolidation of a subsidiary, an entity recognizes a gain or loss on the transaction and measures retained investment in the subsidiary at fair value.  The gain or loss includes any gain or loss associated with the difference between the fair value of the retained investment in the subsidiary and its carrying amount at the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated.  In contrast, an entity is required to account for a decrease in its ownership interest of a subsidiary that does not result in a change of control of the subsidiary as an equity transaction.  The adoption of this Update did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations and disclosures contained in its financial statements.

 

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereof appearing elsewhere in this Report.  This Report, on Form 10-Q, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the securities law.  Actual results or developments could differ materially from those projected in such statements as a result of certain factors set forth in the section below entitles “Factors That May Affect Future Results” and elsewhere in this Report.

 

The real estate market in the Greater Boston area has started to stabilize and the Partnership anticipates that the climate will remain the same in the foreseeable future. The Partnership anticipates declining concessions and tepid increases to revenue for the coming quarter because of the minimal production of rental housing and the improving labor market. The Partnership believes its present cash reserves as well as anticipated rental revenue will be sufficient to fund its current operations, finance current planned improvements to its properties, and continue distribution payments in the foreseeable future. Anticipated deterioration and/or loss of a significant commercial tenant may result in the Partnership recording an impairment loss in the future.

 

Since the Partnership’s long-term goals include the acquisition of additional properties, a portion of the proceeds from the refinancing and sale of properties is reserved for this purpose. The Partnership will consider refinancing or selling existing properties if the Partnership’s cash reserves are insufficient to repay existing mortgages or if the Partnership needs additional funds for future acquisitions. Should six months notice be given on the loan between the Partnership and HBC Holdings and the cash reserves are not available, the Partnership would consider the refinancing or sale of a Partnership property to satisfy this debt.

 

Management believes that the financial difficulties experienced since the lending crisis in 2007 have abated but that the recovery will take longer than previous recessions.   Management also believes that the recovery at the local level will be slow and steady.  While Management has been effective in abating cost increases, real estate tax increases continue to be a reality for the foreseeable future.   As expected, Management has observed improved occupancy levels in the Greater Boston Metropolitan Area, the Partnership’s primary market.  The Partnership believes that the local business climate is improving and expects to see increasing occupancy and revenues for the Partnership in 2011, however there can be no assurance that such increases will be achieved..

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership’s rental income decreased approximately 1.0% from the same period in 2009.  Management believes that the modest decline has abated and that early signs of revenue increases have already been experienced through the renewal season. This is evidenced by October’s rental collections as well as a 38% decline in the vacancy rate compared to the same time last year.  As expected, Managements focus on tenant retention

 

23



Table of Contents

 

and improved leasing strategies has resulted in a decline in turnover expenses and leasing commissions.  Management’s decision to shift to gas related utility operations continues to pay off and offset increasing real estate taxes.  Management is satisfied with the performance of its latest Joint Venture acquisition, Dexter Park.

 

The Stock Repurchase Program that was initiated in 2007 has purchased 398,320 Depository Receipts through September 2010.  Given the lack of alternative investments, liquidity in the capital markets and the current share price, Management continues to support the buyback program and believes it to be accretive to the remaining shareholders.  Management continues to be active bidding on commercial real estate within Massachusetts and remains poised to acquire real estate it deems opportune given the current selling and financing environment.

 

The Partnership has retained The Hamilton Company (“Hamilton”) to manage and administer the Partnership’s and Joint Ventures’ Properties. Hamilton is a full-service real estate management company, which has legal, construction, maintenance, architectural, accounting and administrative departments. The Partnership’s properties represent approximately 40% of the total properties and 70% of the residential properties managed by Hamilton. Substantially all of the other properties managed by Hamilton are owned, wholly or partially, directly or indirectly, by Harold Brown. The Partnership’s Second Amended and Restated Contract of Limited Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”) expressly provides that the general partner may employ a management company to manage the properties, and that such management company may be paid a fee of 4% of rental receipts for administrative and management services (the “Management Fee”). The Partnership pays Hamilton the full annual Management Fee, in monthly installments (2% at Hamilton Park Towers).

 

At September 30, 2010, Harold Brown, his brother Ronald Brown and the President of Hamilton, Carl Valeri, collectively own approximately 39% of the Depositary Receipts representing the Partnership Class A Units (including Depositary Receipts held by trusts for the benefit of such persons’ family members). Harold Brown also owns 75% of the Partnership’s Class B Units, 75% of the capital stock of NewReal, Inc. (“NewReal”), the Partnership’s sole general partner, and all of the outstanding stock of Hamilton. Ronald Brown also owns 25% of the Partnership’s Class B Units and 25% of NewReal’s capital stock. In addition, Ronald Brown is the President and director of NewReal and Harold Brown is NewReal’s Treasurer and a director. Two of NewReal’s other directors, Roberta Ornstein and Conrad DiGregorio, also own immaterial amounts of the Partnership’s Class A Units or receipts.

 

In addition to the Management Fee, the Partnership Agreement further provides for the employment of outside professionals to provide services to the Partnership and allows NewReal to charge the Partnership for the cost of employing professionals to assist with the administration of the Partnership’s properties. Additionally, from time to time, the Partnership pays Hamilton for repairs and maintenance services, legal services, construction services and accounting services. The costs charged by Hamilton for these services are at the same hourly rate charged to all entities managed by Hamilton, and management believes such rates are competitive in the marketplace.

 

Hamilton accounted for approximately 6.5% of the repair and maintenance expense paid for by the Partnership in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 3% for the year ended December 31, 2009. Of the funds paid to Hamilton for this purpose, the great majority was to cover the cost of services provided by the Hamilton maintenance department, including plumbing, electrical, carpentry services, and snow removal for those properties close to Hamilton’s headquarters. However, several of the larger Partnership properties have their own maintenance staff. Further, those properties that do not have their own maintenance staff and are located more than a reasonable distance from Hamilton’s headquarters in Allston, Massachusetts are generally serviced by local, independent companies.

 

Hamilton’s legal department handles most of the Partnership’s eviction and collection matters. Additionally, it prepares most long-term commercial lease agreements and represents the Partnership in selected purchase and sale transactions. Overall, Hamilton provided approximately 76% of the legal services paid for by the Partnership during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

Additionally, as described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, The Hamilton Company receives similar fees from the Investment Properties.

 

The Partnership requires that three bids be obtained for construction contracts in excess of $5,000. Hamilton may be one of the three bidders on a particular project and may be awarded the contract if its bid and its ability to successfully complete the project are deemed appropriate. For contracts that are not awarded to Hamilton, Hamilton charges the Partnership a construction supervision fee equal to 5% of the contract amount. Hamilton’s architectural department also provides services to the Partnership on an as-needed basis. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the construction and architectural service provided to the Partnership by Hamilton was insignificant.

 

24



Table of Contents

 

Prior to 1991, the Partnership employed an outside, unaffiliated company to perform its bookkeeping and accounting functions. Since that time, such services have been provided by Hamilton’s accounting staff, which consists of approximately 14 people. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Hamilton charged the Partnership $93,750 ($125,000 per year) for bookkeeping and accounting services.

 

For more information on related party transactions, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

 

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires the Partnership to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The Partnership regularly and continually evaluates its estimates, including those related to acquiring, developing and assessing the carrying values of its real estate properties and its investments in and advances to joint ventures. The Partnership bases its estimates on historical experience, current market conditions, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. The Partnership’s critical accounting policies are those which require assumptions to be made about such matters that are highly uncertain. Different estimates could have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial results. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of these policies and estimates may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions and circumstances. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Principles of Consolidation.

 

Revenue Recognition:  Rental income from residential and commercial properties is recognized over the term of the related lease. For residential tenants, amounts 60 days in arrears are charged against income. The commercial tenants are evaluated on a case by case basis. Certain leases of the commercial properties provide for increasing stepped minimum rents, which are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

 

Rental Properties:  Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; improvements and additions are capitalized.  When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the asset and related accumulated depreciation is eliminated from the accounts, and any gain or loss on such disposition is included in income.  Fully depreciated assets are removed from the accounts.  Rental properties are depreciated by both straight-line and accelerated methods over their estimated useful lives.  Upon acquisition of rental property, the Partnership estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships.  The Partnership allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values.  The Partnership records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction.  In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Partnership considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information.  The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

 

Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the respective tenant.  Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include a estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions.  In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.  Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships included the nature and extent of the Partnership’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals.  The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases.  The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.

 

In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a rental property may be impaired, analysis of the value is prepared.  The estimated future undiscounted cash flows are compared to the asset’s carrying value to determine if a write-down is required.

 

Impairment:  On an annual basis management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s rental properties may be impaired.  A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate

 

25



Table of Contents

 

future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.  To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property.  The Company’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved. The Partnership has not recognized an impairment loss since 1995.

 

Rental Property Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations:  When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Partnership discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. If, in management’s opinion, the net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established. Properties identified as held for sale and/or sold are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

Investments in Partnerships:  The Partnership accounts for its 40-50% ownership in the Investment Properties under the equity method of accounting, as it does not control these entities. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as Investments in Partnerships, and subsequently adjusted for the Partnership’s share in earnings, cash contributions and distributions. Under the equity method of accounting, our net equity is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets, and our share of net income or loss from the Partnership is included on the consolidated statements of income.

 

With respect to investments in and advances to the Investment Properties, the Partnership looks to the underlying properties to assess performance and the recoverability of carrying amounts for those investments in a manner similar to direct investments in real estate properties. An impairment charge is recorded if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.

 

Legal Proceedings:  The Partnership is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise, from time to time, in the ordinary course of business. These matters are frequently covered by insurance. If it is determined that a loss is likely to occur, the estimated amount of the loss is recorded in the financial statements. Both the amount of the loss and the point at which its occurrence is considered likely can be difficult to determine.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2010 to the three months ended September 30, 2009

 

The Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships incurred a loss of approximately $781,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to income of approximately $299,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease in income of approximately $1,080,000.

 

The rental activity is summarized as follows:

 

 

 

Occupancy Date

 

 

 

October 26, 2010

 

October 26, 2009

 

Residential

 

 

 

 

 

Units—

 

2,288

 

2,288

 

Vacancies

 

69

 

111

 

Vacancy rate

 

3.0

%

4.9

%

Commercial

 

 

 

 

 

Total square feet

 

114,395

 

114,395

 

Vacancy

 

0

 

0

 

Vacancy rate

 

0

%

0

%

 

 

 

Rental Income (in thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

Total
Operations

 

Continuing
Operations

 

Total
Operations

 

Continuing
Operations

 

Total rents

 

$

8,120

 

$

8,120

 

$

8,090

 

$

8,090

 

Residential percentage

 

90

%

90

%

90

%

90

%

Commercial percentage

 

10

%

10

%

10

%

10

%

Contingent rentals

 

$

175

 

$

175

 

$

136

 

$

136

 

 

26



Table of Contents

 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2009:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

Dollar

 

Percent

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

Change

 

Change

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

8,119,956

 

$

8,089,673

 

30,283

 

0.4

%

Laundry and sundry income

 

106,772

 

119,893

 

(13,121

)

(10.9

)%

 

 

8,226,728

 

8,209,566

 

17,162

 

0.2

%

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

409,134

 

416,398

 

(7,264

)

(1.7

)%

Depreciation and amortization

 

1,493,664

 

1,591,668

 

(98,004

)

(6.2

)%

Management fees

 

342,010

 

334,745

 

7,265

 

2.2

%

Operating

 

795,912

 

689,871

 

106,041

 

15.4

%

Renting

 

209,277

 

262,234

 

(52,957

)

(20.2

)%

Repairs and maintenance

 

1,504,045

 

1,435,264

 

68,781

 

4.8

%

Taxes and insurance

 

1,039,924

 

891,239

 

148,685

 

16.7

%

 

 

5,793,966

 

5,621,419

 

172,547

 

3.1

%

Income Before Other Income and Discontinued Operations

 

2,432,762

 

2,588,147

 

(155,385

)

(6.0

)%

Other Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(2,064,796

)

(1,978,591

)

86,205

 

4.4

%

Interest income

 

1,898

 

15,270

 

(13,372

)

(87.6

)%

(Loss) from investment in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

(1,151,355

)

(325,614

)

825,741

 

253.6

%

Other income (loss)

 

 

93

 

(93

)

NA

 

 

 

(3,214,253

)

(2,288,842

)

925,411

 

40.4

%

Net (loss) income

 

$

(781,491

)

$

299,305

 

$

(1,080,796

)

(361.1

)%

 

Rental income from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $8,120,000, compared to approximately $8,090,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $30,000 (0.4%).   Properties with the most significant increases in rental income in the third quarter of 2010 compared to 2009 include; 62 Boylston Street, 1131 Commonwealth Avenue, Redwood Hills, Westgate Woburn, 1144 Commonwealth Avenue, 140 North Beacon Street, and Cypress Street with increases of approximately $56,000, $42,000, $40,000, $38,000, $31,000, $30,000, and $18,000 respectively.  These rental income increases are offset by the amortization of approximately $70,000 in connection with the free rent granted to tenants.

 

Expenses from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were approximately $5,794,000 compared to approximately $5,621,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $172,000 (3.1%). The most significant factors contributing to this increase was an increase in taxes and insurance of approximately $149,000 (16.7%) due to an increase in real estate taxes as well as insurance premiums; an increase in operating expenses of approximately $106,000 (15.4%) due to an increase in utility costs; an increase in repairs and maintenance expenses of approximately $69,000 (4.8%) due to significant repairs at the properties in an effort to maintain occupancy.  These increases are offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $98,000 (6.2%) due to assets being fully depreciated; a decrease in renting expenses of approximately $53,000 (20.2%) due to a decrease in rental commissions.  Interest expense increased approximately $86,000 (4.4%) due primarily to the $7,168,600 borrowed in October 2009.

 

At September 30, 2010, the Partnership has a 40 - 50% ownership interest in nine Investment Properties. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail of the financial information of each Investment Property.

 

As described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Partnership’s share of the net loss from the Investment Properties was approximately $1,151,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a loss of approximately $326,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $826,000.  Included in this loss is depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $1,280,000.  For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the loss associated with the 2009 acquisition of Dexter Park is approximately $916,000, of which approximately $1,023,000 is depreciation and amortization.  See the nine month discussion of Dexter Park for additional information.

 

27



Table of Contents

 

Interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $1,900 compared to approximately $15,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $13,000 (87.6%). This decrease is due to a decrease in the cash available for investment as well as a drop in interest rates.

 

As a result of the changes discussed above, net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $781,000 compared to income of approximately $299,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a change of approximately $1,080,000.

 

Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2009

 

The Partnership and its subsidiary Partnerships earned income before other income and discontinued operations of approximately $7,928,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to approximately $8,319,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $391,000(4.7%).  The following is a summary of the Partnership’s operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

Dollar 

 

Percent 

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

Change

 

Change

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

24,432,776

 

$

24,634,345

 

$

(201,569

)

(0.8

)%

Laundry and sundry income

 

342,698

 

312,263

 

30,435

 

9.7

%

 

 

24,775,474

 

24,946,608

 

(171,134

)

(0.7

)%

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

1,331,734

 

1,277,745

 

53,989

 

4.2

%

Depreciation and amortization

 

4,290,983

 

4,513,165

 

(222,182

)

(4.9

)%

Management fees

 

1,022,230

 

1,011,531

 

10,699

 

1.1

%

Operating

 

2,902,157

 

3,064,201

 

(162,044

)

(5.3

)%

Renting

 

384,273

 

406,363

 

(22,090

)

5.4

%

Repairs and maintenance

 

3,756,649

 

3,580,895

 

175,754

 

4.9

%

Taxes and insurance

 

3,159,361

 

2,773,745

 

385,616

 

13.9

%

 

 

16,847,387

 

16,627,645

 

219,742

 

1.3

%

Income Before Other Income

 

7,928,087

 

8,318,963

 

(390,876

)

(4.7

)%

Other Income (Expense)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(6,141,468

)

(5,885,831

)

255,637

 

4.3

%

Interest income

 

4,411

 

47,861

 

(43,450

)

(90.7

)%

Gain on sale of equipment

 

 

(2,726

)

2,726

 

NA

 

(Loss) from investment in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

(3,169,926

)

(880,902

)

(2,289,024

)

259.8

%

 

 

(9,306,983

)

(6,721,598

)

(2,585,385

)

38.5

%

Net (loss) income

 

$

(1,378,896

)

$

1,597,365

 

$

(2,976,261

)

(186.3

)%

 

Rental income from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $24,433,000 compared to approximately $24,634,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $202,000 (0.8%). This decrease in rental income is due to the amortization of approximately $306,000 in connection with the free rent granted to tenants.  The following properties experienced rental income increases:  62 Boylston Street, Westgate Apartments, Redwood Hills, Westside Colonial and 1144 Commonwealth Avenue with increases of approximately $69,000, $66,000, $58,000, $45,000, and $39,000 respectively.

 

Expenses from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were approximately $16,847,000 compared to approximately $16,628,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $219,000 (1.3%). The most significant factor contributing to this increase is an increase in taxes and insurance of approximately $386,000 (13.9%); an increase in administrative expenses of approximately $54,000(4.2%); and an increase in repairs and maintenance expenses of approximately $176,000(4.9%).  These increases are offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $222,000 (4.9%), a decrease in operating expenses of approximately $162,000(5.3%) and a decrease in renting expenses of approximately $22,000 (5.4%).  The reasons for these changes are discussed in the section for the results for the three months ended September 30, 2010.

 

28


 

 


Table of Contents

 

Interest expense increased approximately $256,000 (4.3%) due to a higher level of debt offset by lower interest rates as well as the $7,168,000 note borrowed for the Dexter Park acquisition in October 2009.

 

At September 30, 2010, the Partnership has between a 40 - 50% ownership interest in nine Investment Properties. See a description of these properties included in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail of the financial information of each Investment Property.

 

As described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Partnership’s share of loss from these Investment Properties was approximately $3,170,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a loss of approximately $881,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $2,289,000.  Included in the net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is depreciation and amortization of approximately $4,149,000.

 

As discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Partnership acquired Dexter Park in October 2009.  A majority of the apartments were leased at the time of the acquisition.  As a result, the Partnership is amortizing the intangible assets associated with the “in place” leases over a 12 month period which began in November 2009.    The total monthly amortization is approximately $407,000 which at 40% reduces the Partnership’s income by approximately $163,000 per month. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the total amortization in connection with these leases is approximately $3,663,000, of which the Partnership’s share is approximately $1,465,000.   In November 2010, the intangible assets will be fully amortized which will result in lower amortization expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership’s share of loss on Dexter Park is approximately $2,476,000.

 

Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $4,400 compared to approximately $48,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $43,600 (90.7%). This decrease is due to a drop in interest rates.

 

As a result of the changes discussed above, net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $1,378,896 compared to income of $1,597,365 for nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease in income of $2,976,261(186.3%).

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

The Partnership’s principal source of cash during 2010 and 2009 was the collection of rents and refinancing of partnership properties. The majority of cash and cash equivalents of $4,814,195 at September 30, 2010 and $2,879,663 at December 31, 2009 was held in interest bearing accounts at creditworthy financial institutions.

 

This increase of $1,934,532 at September 30, 2010 is summarized as follows:

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

Cash provided by operating activities

 

$

5,841,425

 

$

6,926,084

 

Cash (used in) investing activities

 

(853,380

)

(4,710,631

)

Cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

254,607

 

(631,215

)

Repurchase of Depositary Receipts, Class B and General Partner Units

 

(540,911

)

(1,514,340

)

Distributions paid

 

(2,767,209

)

(2,787,414

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

1,934,532

 

$

(2,717,516

)

 

The cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to the collection of rents less cash operating expenses. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is due to a deposit on a future acquisition in 2009 as well as a decrease in 2010 in improvements to the Partnerships rental properties. The increase in cash provided by financing activities is due to the refinancing of a Partnership property in 2010, resulting in an increase in cash, as well as a decrease in the amount of the stock buyback in 2010.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships completed improvements to certain of the properties at a total cost of approximately $1,563,000. These improvements were funded from cash reserves and, to some extent, escrow accounts established in connection with the financing or refinancing of the applicable properties. These sources have been adequate to fully fund improvements. The most significant improvements were made at Westgate Woburn, 62 Boylston Street, Hamilton Oaks, Westside Colonial and 1144 Commonwealth Avenue, at a cost of

 

29



Table of Contents

 

approximately $220,000, $195,000, $150,000, $143,000 and $100,000 respectively. The Partnership plans to invest approximately $604,000 in additional capital improvements in 2010.

 

In 2010, the Partnership approved quarterly distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) payable on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2010.

 

In 2009, the Partnership paid quarterly distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) in March, June, September, and December for a total distribution of $28.00 per unit ($2.80 per receipt).

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the Partnership repurchased 6,896 depositary receipts for $432,920, 164 Class B Units for $102,591 and 9 General Partnership Units for $5,400. The Partnership did not repurchase any depositary receipts or Units during the three months ended September 30, 2010.

 

On August 17, 2010, HBC Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (“HBC”), gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000 on the outstanding loan to the Partnership which had a balance of $5,868,600 on November 12, 2010.  On October 12, 2010, the Partnership paid HBC $1,300,000 and anticipates paying the balance of the payment demanded of $1,200,000 prior to December 31, 2010.  The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBC’s right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice.

 

In December 2009, the Partnership refinanced Linhart, LLP, located in Newton, Massachusetts.  The new loan is $2,000,000, with a rate of 3.75% over the Libor rate or 4.25% whichever is greater and matures five years from the date of closing.  The interest rate as of September 30, 2010 was 4.25%.  The loan agreement calls for interest only payments for twenty four months and principal and interest payments for the remainder of the five year period based on a thirty year amortization.  The loan proceeds were used to pay off the prior loan of approximately $1,700,000, and closing costs of approximately $38,000.

 

On March 25, 2010, the Partnership refinanced the NERA Brookside Associates, LLC.  The new loan is $2,820,000, matures in 2020 and has an interest rate of 5.81%.  The loan is a ten year note however it is being amortized over 30 years. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay off the old mortgage of approximately $1,900,000.  There were no prepayment penalties.

 

The Partnership anticipates that cash from operations and interest bearing accounts will be sufficient to fund its current operations and to finance current improvements to its properties. The Partnership’s net income and cash flow may fluctuate dramatically from year to year as a result of the sale of properties, increases or decreases in rental income or expenses, or the loss of significant tenants.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements-Joint Venture Indebtedness

 

As of September 30, 2010, the Partnership had between a 40 - 50% ownership interest in nine joint ventures, all of which have mortgage indebtedness. We do not have control of these partnerships and therefore we account for them using the equity method.  At September 30, 2010, our proportionate share of the non-recourse debt related to these investments was equal to approximately $61,515,000.  See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

See Notes 5 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of mortgage notes payable. The Partnerships have no other material contractual obligations to be disclosed.

 

Factors That May Affect Future Results

 

Certain information contained herein includes forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Liquidation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). While forward looking statements reflect management’s good faith beliefs when those statements are made, caution should be exercised in interpreting and relying on such forward looking statements, the realization of which may be impacted by known and unknown risks and uncertainties, events that may occur subsequent to the forward-looking statements, and other factors which may be beyond the Partnership’s control and which can materially affect the Partnership’s actual results, performance or achievements for 2010 and beyond. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties mentioned below materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove

 

30



Table of Contents

 

incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.

 

Along with risks detailed from time to time in the Partnership’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, some factors that could cause the Partnership’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following:

 

The Partnership depends on the real estate markets where its properties are located, primarily in Eastern Massachusetts and these markets may be adversely affected by local economic market conditions, which are beyond the Partnership’s control.

 

The Partnership is subject to the general economic risks affecting the real estate industry, such as dependence on tenant’s financial condition and the need to enter into new leases or renew leases on terms favorable to tenants in order to generate rental revenues and our ability to collect rents from our tenants.

 

The Partnership is also impacted by changing economic conditions making alternative housing arrangements more or less attractive to the Partnership’s tenants, such as the interest rates on single family home mortgages and the availability and purchase price of single-family homes in the Greater Boston metropolitan area.

 

The Partnership is subject to significant expenditures associated with each investment, such as debt service payments, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, which are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in revenues from a property.

 

The Partnership is subject to increases in heating and utility costs that may arise as a result of economic and market conditions and fluctuations in seasonal weather conditions.

 

Civil disturbances, earthquakes and other natural disasters may result in uninsured or underinsured losses.

 

Actual or threatened terrorist attacks may adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and the value of our properties.

 

Financing or refinancing of Partnership properties may not be available to the extent necessary or desirable, or may not be available on favorable terms.

 

The Partnership properties face competition from similar properties in the same market. This competition may affect the Partnership’s ability to attract and retain tenants and may reduce the rents that can be charged.

 

Given the nature of the real estate business, the Partnership is subject to potential environmental liabilities. These include environmental contamination in the soil at the Partnership’s or neighboring real estate, whether caused by the Partnership, previous owners of the subject property or neighbors of the subject property, and the presence of hazardous materials in the Partnership’s buildings, such as asbestos, mold and radon gas. Management is not aware of any material environmental liabilities at this time.

 

Insurance coverage for and relating to commercial properties is increasingly costly and difficult to obtain. In addition, insurance carriers have excluded certain specific items from standard insurance policies, which have resulted in increased risk exposure for the Partnership. These include insurance coverage for acts of terrorism and war, and coverage for mold and other environmental conditions. Coverage for these items is either unavailable, or prohibitively expensive.

 

Market interest rates could adversely affect the market prices for Class A Partnership Units and Depositary Receipts as well as performance and cash flow.

 

Changes in income tax laws and regulations may affect the income taxable to owners of the Partnership. These changes may affect the after-tax value of future distributions.

 

31



Table of Contents

 

The Partnership may fail to identify, acquire, construct, or develop additional properties; may develop or acquire properties that do not produce a desired or expected yield on invested capital; may be unable to sell poorly- performing or otherwise undesirable properties quickly; or may fail to effectively integrate acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties.

 

Risks associated with the use of debt to fund acquisitions and developments.

 

Competition for acquisitions may result in increased prices for properties.

 

Any weakness identified in the Partnership’s internal controls as part of the evaluation being undertaken by the Partnership and its independent public accountants pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could have an adverse effect on the Partnership’s business.

 

Ongoing compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 may require additional personnel or system changes.

 

The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive or as an admission regarding the adequacy of disclosures made by the Partnership prior to the date hereof or the effectiveness of said Act. The Partnership expressly disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward- looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

The residential real estate market in the Greater Boston area has softened and the Partnership anticipates the climate will remain the same in the foreseeable future. This may result in increases in vacancy rates and/or a reduction in rents. The Partnership believes its present cash reserves as well as anticipated rental revenue will be sufficient to fund its current operations, and to finance current planned improvements to its properties and continue dividend payments in the foreseeable future.

 

Since the Partnership’s long-term goals include the acquisition of additional properties, a portion of the proceeds from the refinancing and sale of properties is reserved for this purpose. The Partnership will consider refinancing existing properties if the Partnership’s cash reserves are insufficient to repay existing mortgages or if the Partnership needs additional funds for future acquisitions.

 

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

As of September 30, 2010, the Partnership, its Subsidiary Partnerships and the Investment Properties collectively have approximately $286,000,000 in long-term debt, substantially all of which pays interest at fixed rates. Accordingly, the fair value of these debt instruments is affected by changes in market interest rates. These mortgages mature through 2023. For information regarding the fair value and maturity dates of these debt obligations, see Item 2 and Notes 5, 12 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

For additional disclosure about market risk, see “Part I. Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors That May Affect Future Results”.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Company’s management, with the participation of the president and chief financial officer of its general partner, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on such evaluation, the president and chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Company’s general partner have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.

 

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

32



Table of Contents

 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

The Partnership, the Subsidiary Partnerships and their properties are not presently subject to any material litigation, and, to management’s knowledge, there is not any material litigation presently threatened against them.  The Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships are occasionally subject to ordinary routine legal and administrative proceedings incident to the ownership of residential and commercial real estate.  Some of the legal and other expenses related to these proceedings are covered by insurance and none of these costs and expenses are expected to have a material adverse effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership.

 

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

 

There were no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

Item 2.  Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

(a)           None

 

(b)           None.

 

(c)           None

 

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None.

 

Item 4.  (Removed and Reserved)

 

Item 5.  Other Information

 

None.

 

Item 6.  Exhibits

 

(a)           See the exhibit index below.

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description of Exhibit

(31.1)

 

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Ronald Brown, Principal Executive Officer of the Partnership (President and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership)

(31.2)

 

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Harold Brown, Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership (Treasurer and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership)

(32.1)

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Ronald Brown, Principal Executive Officer of the Partnership (President and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership) and Harold Brown, Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership (Treasurer and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership).

 

33



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP

 

By:

/s/ NEWREAL, INC.

 

 

Its General Partner

 

By:

/s/ RONALD BROWN

 

 

Ronald Brown, President

 

Dated: November 12, 2010

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

/s/ RONALD BROWN

 

President and Director of the General Partner

 

November 12, 2010

Ronald Brown

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

/s/ HAROLD BROWN

 

Treasure and Director to the General Partner

 

November 12, 2010

Harold Brown

 

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

34