Annual Statements Open main menu

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2012 September (Form 10-Q)

Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

Commission File Number 1-31565

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware     06-1377322

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

615 Merrick Avenue, Westbury, New York 11590

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)  (516) 683-4100

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes  X  No      

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  X  No      

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  Large Accelerated Filer X   Accelerated Filer        Non-accelerated Filer        Smaller Reporting Company     

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes        No  X

 

439,114,402

 
 

 Number of shares of common stock outstanding at 

October 31, 2012

 


Table of Contents

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

Quarter Ended September 30, 2012

 

INDEX

              Page No.  

Part I.

   FINANCIAL INFORMATION     

Item 1.

   Financial Statements     
   Consolidated Statements of Condition as of September 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011             1
   Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)             2
   Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 (unaudited)             3
   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)             4
   Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements             5

Item 2.

   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations           42

Item 3.

   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk           93

Item 4.

   Controls and Procedures           94

Part II.

   OTHER INFORMATION     

Item 1.

   Legal Proceedings           94

Item 1A.

   Risk Factors           94

Item 2.

   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds           95

Item 3.

   Defaults Upon Senior Securities           95

Item 4.

   Mine Safety Disclosures           95

Item 5.

   Other Information           95

Item 6.

   Exhibits           96

Signatures

          97

Exhibits

    

 

 


Table of Contents

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

(in thousands, except share data)

 

     September 30,
2012
(unaudited)
   December 31,
2011

Assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

     $ 2,538,290          $ 2,001,737    

Securities:

         

Available-for-sale ($165,835 and $590,488 pledged, respectively)

       378,514            724,662    

Held to maturity ($4,377,046 and $3,610,172 pledged, respectively) (fair value of $5,004,397 and $3,966,185, respectively)

       4,765,694            3,815,854    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total securities

       5,144,208            4,540,516    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Non-covered loans held for sale

       1,211,767            1,036,918    

Non-covered loans held for investment, net of deferred loan fees and costs

       26,822,850            25,532,818    

Less:  Allowance for losses on non-covered loans

       (139,015)           (137,290)   
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Non-covered loans held for investment, net

       26,683,835            25,395,528    

Covered loans

       3,400,624            3,753,031    

Less: Allowance for losses on covered loans

       (54,591)           (33,323)   
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Covered loans, net

       3,346,033            3,719,708    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total loans, net

       31,241,635            30,152,154    

Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost

       473,629            490,228    

Premises and equipment, net

       253,504            250,859    

FDIC loss share receivable

       594,994            695,179    

Goodwill

       2,436,131            2,436,131    

Core deposit intangibles, net

       36,734            51,668    

Mortgage servicing rights

       122,530            117,012    

Bank-owned life insurance

       781,630            768,996    

Other real estate owned (includes $50,404 and $71,400, respectively, covered by loss sharing agreements)

       94,336            155,967    

Other assets

       376,174            363,855    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total assets

     $ 44,093,795          $ 42,024,302    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

         

Deposits:

         

NOW and money market accounts

     $   8,814,151          $   8,757,198    

Savings accounts

       4,122,015            3,953,859    

Certificates of deposit

       9,091,022            7,373,263    

Non-interest-bearing accounts

       2,494,435            2,189,810    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total deposits

       24,521,623            22,274,130    

Borrowed funds:

         

Wholesale borrowings:

         

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

       8,945,008            9,314,193    

Repurchase agreements

       4,125,000            4,125,000    

Fed funds purchased

       100,000            --    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total wholesale borrowings

       13,170,008            13,439,193    

Junior subordinated debentures

       427,077            426,936    

Other borrowings

       4,300            94,284    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total borrowed funds

       13,601,385            13,960,413    

Other liabilities

       328,322            224,055    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total liabilities

       38,451,330            36,458,598    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

         

Preferred stock at par $0.01 (5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued)

       --            --    

Common stock at par $0.01 (600,000,000 shares authorized; 439,133,951 and 437,426,665 shares issued, and 439,114,402 and 437,344,796 shares outstanding, respectively)

       4,391            4,374    

Paid-in capital in excess of par

       5,321,655            5,309,269    

Retained earnings

       374,351            324,967    

Treasury stock, at cost (19,549 and 81,869 shares, respectively)

       (258)           (996)   

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

         

Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax

       10,871            1,321    

Net unrealized loss on the non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses on securities, net of tax

       (13,552)           (13,627)   

Net unrealized loss on pension and post-retirement obligations, net of tax

       (54,993)           (59,604)   
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

       (57,674)           (71,910)   
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

       5,642,465            5,565,704    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

     $ 44,093,795          $ 42,024,302    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

1


Table of Contents

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

 

     For the
Three Months Ended
September 30,
            For the
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
         2012              2011                     2012              2011      

Interest Income:

              

Mortgage and other loans

    $ 394,935           $ 400,114                       $ 1,199,600           $ 1,224,348      

Securities and money market investments

     47,776            61,777               144,729            177,474      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest income

     442,711            461,891               1,344,329            1,401,822      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Interest Expense:

              

NOW and money market accounts

     9,106            9,095               27,196            30,647      

Savings accounts

     3,288            3,696               10,349            12,029      

Certificates of deposit

     23,516            25,173               70,725            77,099      

Borrowed funds

     121,851            128,960               366,039            381,884      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest expense

     157,761            166,924               474,309            501,659      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income

     284,950            294,967               870,020            900,163      

Provision for losses on non-covered loans

     10,000            18,000               40,000            59,000      

Provision for losses on covered loans

     2,820            --               21,268            8,708      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income after provisions for loan losses

     272,130            276,967               808,752            832,455      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-Interest Income:

              

Total loss on OTTI of securities

     --            --               --            (18,124)     

Less:  Non-credit portion of OTTI recorded in other comprehensive income (before taxes)

     --            --               --            --      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net loss on OTTI recognized in earnings

     --            --               --            (18,124)     

Mortgage banking income

     52,581            24,274               146,069            55,986      

Fee income

     9,427            11,544               28,618            35,586      

Bank-owned life insurance

     6,781            6,890               23,168            21,343      

Net gain on sales of securities

     510            6,734               1,369            35,469      

FDIC indemnification income

     2,256            --               17,015            7,624      

Gain on business disposition

     --            --               --            9,823      

Other

     10,102            8,627               25,619            27,860      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

     81,657            58,069               241,858            175,567      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-Interest Expense:

              

Operating expenses:

              

Compensation and benefits

     74,416            76,898               221,624            222,184      

Occupancy and equipment

     22,956            21,711               68,089            65,421      

General and administrative

     51,094            47,918               154,280            146,139      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     148,466            146,527               443,993            433,744      

Amortization of core deposit intangibles

     4,855            6,089               14,934            20,618      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest expense

     153,321            152,616               458,927            454,362      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

     200,466            182,420               591,683            553,660      

Income tax expense

     71,668            62,670               213,420            191,275      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net Income

    $ 128,798           $ 119,750             $   378,263           $   362,385      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

              

Change in net unrealized gain/loss on securities available for sale, net of tax of $3,498; $3,961; $6,971; and $3,502, respectively

     5,198            6,109               10,383            (5,167)     

Change in the non-credit portion of OTTI losses recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax of $17; $17; $48; and $4,842, respectively

     26            22               75            7,229      

Change in pension and post-retirement obligations, net of tax of $1,042; $503; $3,128; and $1,509, respectively

     1,537            741               4,611            2,225      

Less:   Reclassification adjustment for sales of available for sale securities and loss on OTTI of securities, net of tax of $204; $5,550; $536; and $6,978, respectively

     (306)           (8,245)              (833)           (10,367)     
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

     6,455            (1,373)              14,236            (6,080)     
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

    $ 135,253           $ 118,377             $   392,499           $   356,305      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

     $0.29            $0.27               $0.86            $0.82      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

     $0.29            $0.27               $0.86            $0.82      
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

2


Table of Contents

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

 

   

For the Nine Months
 Ended September 30, 2012 

Common Stock (Par Value: $0.01):

           

Balance at beginning of year

                          $ 4,374                       

Shares issued for restricted stock awards (1,707,286 shares)

          17        
       

 

 

     

Balance at end of period

          4,391        
       

 

 

     

Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par:

           

Balance at beginning of year

          5,309,269        

Shares issued for restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures

          (3,430)       

Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards

          15,476        

Tax effect of stock plans

          340        
       

 

 

     

Balance at end of period

          5,321,655        
       

 

 

     

Retained Earnings:

           

Balance at beginning of year

          324,967        

Net income

          378,263        

Dividends paid on common stock ($0.75 per share)

          (328,879)       
       

 

 

     

Balance at end of period

          374,351        
       

 

 

     

Treasury Stock:

           

Balance at beginning of year

          (996)       

Purchase of common stock (209,555 shares)

          (2,713)       

Shares issued for restricted stock awards (271,875 shares)

          3,451        
       

 

 

     

Balance at end of period

          (258)       
       

 

 

     

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax:

           

Balance at beginning of year

          (71,910)       

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

          14,236        
       

 

 

     

Balance at end of period

          (57,674)       
       

 

 

     

Total stockholders’ equity

         $  5,642,465        
       

 

 

     

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2012        2011  

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

       

Net income

    $ 378,263            $ 362,385     

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

       

Provision for loan losses

     61,268             67,708     

Depreciation and amortization

     18,699             17,642     

Accretion of premiums and discounts, net

     (2,263)            (987)    

Amortization of core deposit intangibles

     14,934             20,618     

Net gain on sale of securities

     (1,369)            (35,469)    

Net gain on sale of loans

     (159,511)            (56,131)    

Gain on business disposition

     --             (9,823)    

Stock plan-related compensation

     15,514             12,096     

Loss on OTTI of securities recognized in earnings

     --             18,124     

Changes in assets and liabilities:

       

Decrease in deferred tax asset, net

     28,344             51,799     

Decrease (increase) in other assets

     93,341             (2,985)    

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

     112,006             (82,526)    

Origination of loans held for sale

     (7,971,638)            (4,426,713)    

Proceeds from sale of loans originated for sale

     7,950,220             4,705,787     
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     537,808             641,525     
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

       

Proceeds from repayment of securities held to maturity

     1,838,793             1,821,919     

Proceeds from repayment of securities available for sale

     457,808             158,479     

Proceeds from sale of securities held to maturity

     --             284,406     

Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale

     561,369             740,738     

Purchase of securities held to maturity

     (2,785,758)            (2,609,676)    

Purchase of securities available for sale

     (656,115)            (748,721)    

Net redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     16,599             3,424     

Net increase in loans

     (969,820)            (1,191,660)    

Purchase of premises and equipment, net

     (21,344)            (29,491)    

Net cash acquired in business transactions

     --             100,027     
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (1,558,468)            (1,470,555)    
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

       

Net increase in deposits

     2,247,493             943,596     

Net decrease in short-term borrowed funds

     (262,000)            --     

Net decrease in long-term borrowed funds

     (97,028)            (121,039)    

Tax effect of stock plans

     340             2,518     

Cash dividends paid on common stock

     (328,879)            (327,657)    

Treasury stock purchases

     (2,713)            (2,769)    

Net cash received from stock option exercises

     --             3,519     
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

     1,557,213             498,168     
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     536,553             (330,862)    

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     2,001,737             1,927,542     
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

    $  2,538,290            $  1,596,680     
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Supplemental information:

       

Cash paid for interest

      $469,664              $513,189     

Cash paid for income taxes

     196,761             106,480     

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

       

Transfers to other real estate owned from loans

     77,080             197,114     

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

Organization

Formerly known as Queens County Bancorp, Inc., New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (on a stand-alone basis, the “Parent Company” or, collectively with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) was organized under Delaware law on July 20, 1993 and is the holding company for New York Community Bank and New York Commercial Bank (hereinafter referred to as the “Community Bank” and the “Commercial Bank,” respectively, and collectively as the “Banks”). In addition, for the purpose of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the “Community Bank” and the “Commercial Bank” refer not only to the respective banks but also to their respective subsidiaries.

The Community Bank is the primary banking subsidiary of the Company. Founded on April 14, 1859 and formerly known as Queens County Savings Bank, the Community Bank converted from a state-chartered mutual savings bank to the capital stock form of ownership on November 23, 1993, on which date the Company completed its initial offering of common stock (par value: $0.01 per share) at a price of $25.00 per share. The Commercial Bank was established on December 30, 2005.

Reflecting nine stock splits, the Company’s initial offering price adjusts to $0.93 per share. All share and per share data presented in this report have been adjusted to reflect the impact of the stock splits.

The Company changed its name to New York Community Bancorp, Inc. on November 21, 2000 in anticipation of completing the first of eight business combinations that expanded its footprint well beyond Queens County to encompass all five boroughs of New York City, Long Island, and Westchester County in New York, and seven counties in the northern and central parts of New Jersey. The Company expanded beyond this region to south Florida, northeast Ohio, and central Arizona through its FDIC-assisted acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities of AmTrust Bank (“AmTrust”) in December 2009, and extended its Arizona franchise through its FDIC-assisted acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities of Desert Hills Bank (“Desert Hills”) in March 2010. On June 28, 2012, the Company completed its 11th transaction when it assumed the deposits of Aurora Bank FSB.

Reflecting this strategy of growth through acquisitions, the Community Bank currently operates 240 branches, four of which operate directly under the Community Bank name. The remaining 236 branches operate through seven divisional banks—Queens County Savings Bank, Roslyn Savings Bank, Richmond County Savings Bank, and Roosevelt Savings Bank (in New York), Garden State Community Bank in New Jersey, AmTrust Bank in Florida and Arizona, and Ohio Savings Bank in Ohio.

The Commercial Bank currently operates 34 branches in Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, Westchester County, and Long Island (all in New York), including 17 branches that operate under the name “Atlantic Bank.”

Basis of Presentation

The following is a description of the significant accounting and reporting policies that the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries follow in preparing and presenting their consolidated financial statements, which conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and to general practices within the banking industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to change in the near term are used in connection with the determination of the allowances for loan losses; the valuation of loans held for sale; the evaluation of goodwill for impairment; the evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on securities; and the evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance on the Company’s deferred tax assets. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these material estimates.

 

5


Table of Contents

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. All inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company currently has unconsolidated subsidiaries in the form of nine wholly-owned statutory business trusts, which were formed to issue guaranteed capital debentures (“capital securities”). Please see Note 6, “Borrowed Funds,” for additional information regarding these trusts.

When necessary, certain reclassifications have been made to prior-year amounts to conform to the current-year presentation.

Note 2. Computation of Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the same method as basic EPS, however, the computation reflects the potential dilution that would occur if outstanding in-the-money stock options were exercised and converted into common stock.

Unvested stock-based compensation awards containing non-forfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities and therefore are included in the two-class method for calculating EPS. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to common shares and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive dividends. The Company grants restricted stock to certain employees under its stock-based compensation plans. Recipients receive cash dividends during the vesting periods of these awards (i.e., including on the unvested portion of such awards). Since these dividends are non-forfeitable, the unvested awards are considered participating securities and have earnings allocated to them.

The following table presents the Company’s computation of basic and diluted EPS for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
         Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
(in thousands, except share and per share data)          2012                  2011                      2012                  2011        

Net income

     $128,798           $119,750             $378,263           $362,385     

Less: Dividends paid on and earnings allocated to

          participating securities

     (1,213)          (914)            (3,552)          (2,732)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

 

Earnings applicable to common stock

     $127,585           $118,836             $374,711           $359,653     
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     437,787,688           436,243,926             437,692,411           435,980,390     
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

     $0.29           $0.27             $0.86           $0.82     
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

 

Earnings applicable to common stock

     $127,585           $118,836             $374,711           $359,653     
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     437,787,688           436,243,926             437,692,411           435,980,390     

Potential dilutive common shares(1)

     5,664           33,640             5,026           371,359     
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total shares for diluted earnings per share computation

     437,793,352           436,277,566             437,697,437           436,351,749     
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share and common share equivalents

     $0.29           $0.27             $0.86           $0.82     
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Options to purchase 2,579,585 shares of the Company’s common stock that were outstanding in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, at a weighted average exercise price of $16.86, were excluded from the respective computations of diluted EPS because their inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect. Options to purchase 8,918,493 and 3,122,124 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock that were outstanding in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, at respective weighted average exercise prices of $15.64 and $17.32, were excluded from the respective computations of diluted EPS because their inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect.

 

6


Table of Contents

Note 3. Securities

The following table summarizes the Company’s portfolio of securities available for sale at September 30, 2012:

 

     September 30, 2012
(in thousands)     Amortized 
Cost
       Gross
  Unrealized  
Gain
       Gross
  Unrealized  
Loss
        Fair Value 

Mortgage-Related Securities:

                         

GSE (1) certificates

     $ 93,764           $ 8,270           $ 6           $ 102,028  

GSE CMOs (2)

       80,472            5,945            --            86,417  

Private label CMOs

       18,426            --            325            18,101  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total mortgage-related securities

     $ 192,662           $ 14,215           $    331           $ 206,546  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Other Securities:

                         

GSE debentures

     $ 11,000           $ 68           $ --           $ 11,068  

State, county, and municipal

       1,195            131            --            1,326  

Capital trust notes

       35,228            2,352            4,009            33,571  

Preferred stock

       77,913            5,093            --            83,006  

Common stock

       42,917            1,273            1,193            42,997  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total other securities

     $ 168,253           $ 8,917           $  5,202           $ 171,968  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total securities available for sale (3)

     $ 360,915           $ 23,132           $  5,533           $ 378,514  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

(1) Government-sponsored enterprises
(2) Collateralized mortgage obligations
(3) The non-credit portion of OTTI recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”) was $570,000 (before taxes).

As of September 30, 2012, the fair value of marketable equity securities included common stock of $43.0 million, corporate preferred stock of $82.9 million, and Freddie Mac preferred stock of $105,000. Common stock primarily consisted of an investment in a large cap equity fund and certain other funds that are Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) eligible. The Freddie Mac preferred stock was recognized by the Company as other-than-temporarily impaired in the fourth quarter of 2008.

The following table summarizes the Company’s portfolio of securities available for sale at December 31, 2011:

 

     December 31, 2011
(in thousands)     Amortized 
Cost
       Gross
  Unrealized  
Gain
       Gross
  Unrealized  
Loss
        Fair Value 

Mortgage-Related Securities:

                         

GSE certificates

     $ 97,642          $ 5,013           $ 10          $ 102,645  

GSE CMOs

       62,373            2,903            --            65,276  

Private label CMOs

       25,306            --            1,265            24,041  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total mortgage-related securities

     $ 185,321          $ 7,916           $ 1,275          $ 191,962  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Other Securities:

                         

GSE debentures

     $ 456,969          $ 1,797           $ --          $ 458,766  

State, county, and municipal

       1,188            97            --            1,285  

Capital trust notes

       36,754            141            4,692            32,203  

Preferred stock

       --            195            --            195  

Common stock

       42,863            1,604            4,216            40,251  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total other securities

     $  537,774          $   3,834           $   8,908          $  532,700  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total securities available for sale (1)

     $  723,095          $ 11,750           $  10,183          $  724,662  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

(1) The non-credit portion of OTTI recorded in AOCL was $570,000 (before taxes).

 

7


Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the Company’s portfolio of securities held to maturity at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

     September 30, 2012
(in thousands)     Amortized 
Cost
     Carrying  
Amount
   Gross
    Unrealized    
Gain
   Gross
   Unrealized   
Loss
    Fair Value 

Mortgage-Related Securities:

                        

GSE certificates

      $ 1,266,523         $ 1,266,523         $ 102,160         $ --         $ 1,368,683  

GSE CMOs

       2,087,968          2,087,968          110,349          --          2,198,317  

Other mortgage-related securities

       3,263          3,263          --          --          3,263  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total mortgage-related securities

      $ 3,357,754         $ 3,357,754         $ 212,509         $ --         $ 3,570,263  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Other Securities:

                        

GSE debentures

      $ 1,203,313         $ 1,203,313         $ 17,121         $ 26         $ 1,220,408  

Corporate bonds

       77,407          77,407          9,715          --          87,122  

Municipal bonds

       17,326          17,326          347          --          17,673  

Capital trust notes

       131,507          109,894          14,804          15,767          108,931  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total other securities

      $ 1,429,553         $ 1,407,940         $ 41,987         $ 15,793         $ 1,434,134  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total securities held to maturity (1)

      $ 4,787,307         $ 4,765,694         $ 254,496         $ 15,793         $ 5,004,397  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

(1) Held-to-maturity securities are reported at a carrying amount equal to amortized cost less the non-credit portion of OTTI recorded in AOCL. The non-credit portion of OTTI recorded in AOCL was $21.6 million (before taxes).

 

     December 31, 2011
(in thousands)     Amortized 
Cost
     Carrying  
Amount
   Gross
    Unrealized    
Gain
   Gross
   Unrealized   
Loss
    Fair Value 

Mortgage-Related Securities:

                        

GSE certificates

      $ 660,945         $ 660,945         $ 47,064         $ --         $ 708,009  

GSE CMOs

       2,331,916          2,331,916          93,216          --          2,425,132  

Other mortgage-related securities

       3,379          3,379          --          --          3,379  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total mortgage-related securities

      $ 2,996,240         $ 2,996,240         $ 140,280         $ --         $ 3,136,520  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Other Securities:

                        

GSE debentures

      $ 633,258         $ 633,258         $ 14,878         $ 146         $ 647,990  

Corporate bonds

       54,759          54,759          2,826          12          57,573  

Capital trust notes

       153,334          131,597          12,362          19,857          124,102  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total other securities

      $ 841,351         $ 819,614         $ 30,066         $ 20,015         $ 829,665  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total securities held to maturity (1)

      $ 3,837,591         $ 3,815,854         $ 170,346         $ 20,015         $ 3,966,185  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

(1) The non-credit portion of OTTI recorded in AOCL was $21.7 million (before taxes).

The Company had $473.6 million and $490.2 million of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, at cost, at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company is required to maintain this investment in order to have access to funding resources provided by the FHLB.

The following table summarizes the gross proceeds, gross realized gains, and gross realized losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

      For the Nine Months Ended 
September 30,
(in thousands)   

    2012    

  

    2011    

Gross proceeds

     $ 561,369        $ 740,738  

Gross realized gains

       1,369          26,977  

Gross realized losses

       --          11  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company sold held-to-maturity securities with gross proceeds of $284.4 million and gross realized gains of $8.5 million. These sales occurred because the Company had either collected a substantial portion (at least 85%) of the initial principal balance or because there was evidence of significant deterioration in the issuers’ creditworthiness.

 

8


Table of Contents

The $142.5 million market value of the capital trust note portfolio at September 30, 2012 included three pooled trust preferred securities. The following table details the pooled trust preferred securities that had at least one credit rating below investment grade as of September 30, 2012:

 

     INCAPS
Funding I
  Alesco Preferred
Funding VII Ltd.
  Preferred Term
Securities II
(dollars in thousands)     Class B-2 Notes    Class C-1 Notes    Mezzanine Notes 

Book value

       $14,964         $553         $491  

Fair value

       17,095         281         728  

Unrealized gain (loss)

       2,131         (272 )       237  

Lowest credit rating assigned to security

       CCC         C         C  

Number of banks/insurance companies currently performing

       24         58         24  

Actual deferrals and defaults as a percentage of original collateral

       8 %       18 %       34 %

Expected deferrals and defaults as a percentage of remaining performing collateral

       22         25         19  

Expected recoveries as a percentage of remaining performing collateral

       --         --         2  

Excess subordination as a percentage of remaining performing collateral

       17         --         --  

As of September 30, 2012, after taking into account the Company’s best estimates of future deferrals, defaults, and recoveries, two of its pooled trust preferred securities had no excess subordination in the classes it owns and one had excess subordination of 17%. Excess subordination is calculated after taking into account the deferrals, defaults, and recoveries noted in the table above, and indicates whether there is sufficient additional collateral to cover the outstanding principal balance of the class owned, after taking into account these projected deferrals, defaults, and recoveries.

As the following table indicates, there was no activity from December 31, 2011 through September 30, 2012 in the credit loss component of OTTI on debt securities for which a non-credit component of OTTI was recognized in AOCL. The beginning balance represents the credit loss component for debt securities for which OTTI occurred prior to January 1, 2012. For credit-impaired debt securities, OTTI recognized in earnings after that date is presented as an addition in two components, based upon whether the current period is the first time a debt security was credit-impaired (initial credit impairment) or is not the first time a debt security was credit-impaired (subsequent credit impairment).

 

 

(in thousands)

  For the Nine Months
 Ended September 30, 2012 

Beginning credit loss amount as of December 31, 2011

     $ 219,978  

Add:    Initial other-than-temporary credit losses

      --  

            Subsequent other-than-temporary credit losses

      --  

            Amount previously recognized in AOCL

      --  

Less:    Realized losses for securities sold

      --  

            Securities intended or required to be sold

      --  

            Increases in expected cash flows on debt securities

      --  
   

 

 

 

Ending credit loss amount as of September 30, 2012

     $ 219,978  
   

 

 

 

 

9


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of held-to-maturity debt securities, and the amortized costs and estimated fair values of available-for-sale debt securities, at September 30, 2012, by contractual maturity. Mortgage-related securities held to maturity and available for sale, all of which have prepayment provisions, are distributed to a maturity category based on the ends of the estimated average lives of such securities. Principal and amortization prepayments are not shown in maturity categories as they occur, but are considered in the determination of estimated average life.

 

 

     Carrying Amount at September 30, 2012     
(dollars in thousands)    Mortgage-
Related
Securities
   Average
Yield
   U.S. Treasury
and GSE
Obligations
   Average
Yield
   State, County,
and Municipal
   Average
Yield
(1)
   Other Debt
Securities 
(2)
   Average
Yield
   Fair Value

Held-to-Maturity Securities:

                                            

Due within one year

      $ --          --%           $ --          --%          $ --          --%          $ --          --%          $ --  

Due from one to five years

       --          --               --          --               1,791          2.96               46,588          4.04               49,836  

Due from five to ten years

       1,715,778          3.20               60,682          4.17               --          --               --          --               1,925,888  

Due after ten years

       1,641,976          3.73               1,142,631          2.60               15,535          3.90               140,713          6.55               3,028,673  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total debt securities held to maturity

      $ 3,357,754          3.46%           $ 1,203,313            2.68%          $  17,326          3.80%          $  187,301            5.93%          $  5,004,397  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Available-for-Sale Securities: (3)

                                            

Due within one year

      $ --          --%           $ --          --%          $ 125          5.63%          $ --          --%          $ 126  

Due from one to five years

       7,936          7.22               --          --               512          6.21               --          --               9,011  

Due from five to ten years

       78,396          3.48               11,000          3.25               558          6.56               --          --               98,119  

Due after ten years

       106,330          3.71               --          --               --          --               35,228          6.06               145,255  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total debt securities available for sale

      $ 192,662            3.76%           $ 11,000            3.25%          $ 1,195            6.31%          $ 35,228            6.06%          $ 252,511  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

(1) Not presented on a tax-equivalent basis.
(2) Includes corporate bonds and capital trust notes. Included in capital trust notes are $15.5 million and $491,000 of pooled trust preferred securities available for sale and held to maturity, respectively, all of which are due after ten years. The remaining capital trust notes consist of single-issue trust preferred securities.
(3) As equity securities have no contractual maturity, they have been excluded from this table.

At September 30, 2012, the Company had commitments to purchase $310.3 million of securities, all of which were GSE securities.

 

10


Table of Contents

The following tables present held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities having a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and for twelve months or longer as of September 30, 2012:

 

At September 30, 2012   Less than Twelve Months   Twelve Months or Longer   Total
(in thousands)  

   Fair Value   

   Unrealized Loss       Fair Value       Unrealized Loss       Fair Value          Unrealized    
Loss

Temporarily Impaired Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities:

                       

GSE debentures

      $    14,956          $  26          $        --         $             --         $    14,956          $         26  

Corporate bonds

      --         --         --         --         --         --  

Municipal bonds

      --         --         --         --         --         --  

Capital trust notes

      --         --         55,373         15,767         55,373         15,767  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired held-to-maturity debt securities

      $    14,956          $  26          $55,373         $ 15,767            $    70,329          $  15,793  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Temporarily Impaired Available-for-Sale Securities:

                       

Debt Securities:

                       

GSE certificates

      $         371          $    6          $        --         $          --            $         371          $           6  

Private label CMOs

      18,101         325         --         --            18,101         325  

Capital trust notes

      --         --         6,518         4,009            6,518         4,009  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired available-for-sale debt securities

      $    18,472          $331          $  6,518         $    4,009            $    24,990          $    4,340  

Equity securities

      --         --         29,667         1,193(1)          29,667         1,193  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired available-for-sale securities

      $    18,472          $331          $36,185         $    5,202            $    54,657          $    5,533  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

(1) The twelve months or longer unrealized losses on equity securities of $1.2 million at September 30, 2012 relate to available-for-sale equity securities that consisted of a large cap equity fund and investments in certain financial institutions at that date. The principal balance of the large cap equity fund was $29.1 million and the twelve months or longer unrealized loss was $556,000. The principal balance of investments in financial institutions totaled $1.7 million and the twelve months or longer unrealized loss was $623,000.

 

11


Table of Contents

The following tables present held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities having a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and for twelve months or longer as of December 31, 2011:

 

At December 31, 2011   Less than Twelve Months   Twelve Months or Longer   Total
(in thousands)     Fair Value      Unrealized Loss      Fair Value      Unrealized Loss      Fair Value      Unrealized Loss 

Temporarily Impaired Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities:

                       

GSE debentures

     $ 62,601        $ 146        $ --        $ --        $ 62,601        $ 146  

GSE certificates

      --         --         --         --         --         --  

GSE CMOs

      --         --         --         --         --         --  

Corporate bonds

      4,987         12         --         --         4,987         12  

Capital trust notes

      971         43         68,570         19,814      

 

69,541

 

   

 

19,857

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired held-to-maturity debt securities

     $ 68,559        $ 201        $ 68,570        $ 19,814        $ 137,129        $ 20,015  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Temporarily Impaired Available-for-Sale Securities:

                       

Debt Securities:

                       

GSE certificates

     $ 181        $ 9        $ 13        $ 1        $ 194        $ 10  

Private label CMOs

      24,041         1,265         --         --         24,041         1,265  

Corporate bonds

      --         --         --         --         --         --  

State, county, and municipal

      --         --         --         --         --         --  

Capital trust notes

      15,154         363         9,810         4,329         24,964         4,692  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired available-for-sale debt securities

     $ 39,376        $ 1,637        $ 9,823        $ 4,330      

 $

49,199

 

   

 $

5,967

 

Equity securities

      784         40         26,651         4,176         27,435         4,216  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired available-for-sale securities

     $ 40,160        $ 1,677        $ 36,474        $ 8,506        $ 76,634        $ 10,183  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

12


Table of Contents

An OTTI loss on impaired securities must be fully recognized in earnings if an investor has the intent to sell the debt security or if it is more likely than not that the investor will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost. However, even if an investor does not expect to sell a debt security, it must evaluate the expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has occurred. In the event that a credit loss occurs, only the amount of impairment associated with the credit loss is recognized in earnings. Amounts relating to factors other than credit losses are recorded in AOCL. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance also requires additional disclosures regarding the calculation of credit losses, as well as factors considered by the investor in reaching a conclusion that an investment is not other-than-temporarily impaired.

Available-for-sale securities in unrealized loss positions are analyzed as part of the Company’s ongoing assessment of OTTI. When the Company intends to sell such available-for-sale securities, the Company recognizes an impairment loss equal to the full difference between the amortized cost basis and the fair value of those securities. When the Company does not intend to sell available-for-sale equity or debt securities in an unrealized loss position, potential OTTI is considered based on a variety of factors, including the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than the cost; adverse conditions specifically related to the industry, the geographic area, or financial condition of the issuer, or the underlying collateral of a security; the payment structure of the security; changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency; the volatility of the fair value changes; and changes in fair value of the security after the balance sheet date. For debt securities, the Company estimates cash flows over the remaining life of the underlying collateral to assess whether credit losses exist and, where applicable, to determine if any adverse changes in cash flows have occurred. The Company’s cash flow estimates take into account expectations of relevant market and economic data as of the end of the reporting period. As of September 30, 2012, the Company did not intend to sell the securities with an unrealized loss position in AOCL, and it was more likely than not that the Company would not be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis. The Company believes that the securities with an unrealized loss position in AOCL were not other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2012.

Other factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been below cost; the severity of the impairment; the cause of the impairment; the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; activity in the market of the issuer that may indicate adverse credit conditions; and the forecasted recovery period using current estimates of volatility in market interest rates (including liquidity and risk premiums).

Management’s assertion regarding its intent not to sell, or that it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery, is based on a number of factors, including a quantitative estimate of the expected recovery period (which may extend to maturity) and management’s intended strategy with respect to the identified security or portfolio. If management does have the intent to sell, or believes it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery, the unrealized loss is charged directly to earnings in the Consolidated Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income.

The Company reviews quarterly financial information related to its investments in capital trust notes as well as other information that is released by each financial institution to determine the continued creditworthiness of the issuer of the securities. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit settling the securities at prices that are less than the amortized costs of the investments; therefore, the Company expects that these investments will not be settled at prices that are less than their amortized costs. The Company continues to monitor these investments and currently estimates that the present value of expected cash flows is not less than the amortized cost of the securities. Because the Company does not have the intent to sell the investments, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell them before the anticipated recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity, it did not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2012. It is possible that these securities will perform worse than is currently expected, which could lead to adverse changes in cash flows from these securities and potential OTTI losses in the future. Events that may occur in the future at the financial institutions that issued these securities could trigger material unrecoverable declines in the fair values of the Company’s investments and therefore could result in future potential OTTI losses. Such events include, but are not limited to, government intervention, deteriorating asset quality and credit metrics, significantly higher levels of default and loan loss provisions, losses in value on the underlying collateral, deteriorating credit enhancement, net operating losses, and further illiquidity in the financial markets.

 

13


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2012, the Company’s equity securities portfolio consisted of perpetual preferred and common stock, and mutual funds. The Company considers a decline in the fair value of available-for-sale equity securities to be other than temporary if the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. The unrealized losses on the Company’s equity securities were primarily caused by market volatility. The Company evaluated the near-term prospects of a recovery of fair value for each security in the portfolio, together with the severity and duration of impairment to date. Based on this evaluation, and the Company’s ability and intent to hold these investments for a period of time reasonably sufficient to realize a near-term forecasted recovery of fair value, the Company did not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2012. Nonetheless, it is possible that these equity securities will perform worse than is currently expected, which could lead to adverse changes in their fair values, or the failure of the securities to fully recover in value as presently forecasted by management, causing the Company to potentially record OTTI losses in future periods. Events that could trigger material declines in the fair values of these securities include, but are not limited to, deterioration in the equity markets; a decline in the quality of the loan portfolios of the issuers in which the Company has invested; and the recording of higher loan loss provisions and net operating losses by such issuers.

The investment securities designated as having a continuous loss position for twelve months or more at September 30, 2012 consisted of eight capital trust notes and four equity securities. At December 31, 2011, the investment securities designated as having a continuous loss position for twelve months or more consisted of one mortgage-related security, eleven capital trust notes, and six equity securities. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the combined market value of the respective securities represented unrealized losses of $21.0 million and $28.3 million. At September 30, 2012, the fair value of securities having a continuous loss position for twelve months or more was 18.7% below the collective amortized cost of $112.0 million. At December 31, 2011, the fair value of such securities was 21.2% below the collective amortized cost of $133.4 million.

 

14


Table of Contents

Note 4. Loans

The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

    September 30, 2012   December 31, 2011
(dollars in thousands)        Amount        Percent of
Non-Covered
 Loans Held for 
Investment
       Amount        Percent of
Non-Covered
 Loans Held for 
Investment

Non-Covered Loans Held for Investment:

               

Mortgage Loans:

               

Multi-family

      $18,468,229           68.88%           $17,430,628           68.28%   

Commercial real estate

      7,193,194           26.83             6,855,244           26.85     

Acquisition, development, and construction

      383,695           1.43             445,671           1.75     

One-to-four family

      131,115           0.49             127,361           0.50     
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total mortgage loans held for investment

      26,176,233           97.63             $24,858,904           97.38     
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Other Loans:

               

Commercial and industrial

      582,572           2.17             599,986           2.35     

Other

      54,256           0.20             69,907           0.27     
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total other loans held for investment

      636,828           2.37             669,893           2.62     
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total non-covered loans held for investment

      26,813,061            100.00%           $25,528,797            100.00%   
       

 

 

         

 

 

 

Net deferred loan origination costs

      9,789               4,021        

Allowance for losses on non-covered loans

      (139,015)              (137,290)       
   

 

 

         

 

 

     

Non-covered loans held for investment, net

      26,683,835               $25,395,528        

Covered loans

      3,400,624               3,753,031        

Allowance for losses on covered loans

      (54,591)              (33,323)       
   

 

 

         

 

 

     

Total covered loans, net

      3,346,033               $  3,719,708        

Loans held for sale

      1,211,767               1,036,918        
   

 

 

         

 

 

     

Total loans, net

      $31,241,635               $30,152,154        
   

 

 

         

 

 

     

Non-Covered Loans

Non-Covered Loans Held for Investment

The vast majority of the loans the Company originates for investment are multi-family loans, most of which are collateralized by non-luxury apartment buildings in New York City that feature below-market rents. In addition, the Company originates commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans, most of which are collateralized by properties located in New York City and, to a lesser extent, on Long Island and in New Jersey.

To a lesser extent, the Company also originates acquisition, development, and construction (“ADC”) loans and commercial and industrial (“C&I”) loans. ADC loans are primarily originated for multi-family and residential tract projects in New York City and on Long Island, while C&I loans are made on both a secured and unsecured basis, to small and mid-size businesses in New York City, Long Island, New Jersey, and, to a lesser extent, Arizona, for working capital, business expansion, and the purchase of machinery and equipment.

Payments on multi-family and CRE loans generally depend on the income produced by the underlying properties which, in turn, depends on their successful operation and management. Accordingly, the ability of the Company’s borrowers to repay these loans may be impacted by adverse conditions in the local real estate market and the local economy. While the Company generally requires that such loans be qualified on the basis of the collateral property’s current cash flows, appraised value, and debt service coverage ratio, among other factors, there can be no assurance that its underwriting policies will protect the Company from credit-related losses or delinquencies.

ADC loans typically involve a higher degree of credit risk than loans secured by improved or owner-occupied real estate. The risk of loss on an ADC loan is largely dependent upon the accuracy of the initial appraisal of the property’s value upon completion of construction or development; the estimated cost of construction, including interest; and the estimated time to complete and/or sell or lease such property. The Company seeks to minimize these risks by maintaining consistent lending policies and rigorous underwriting standards. However, if the estimate

 

15


Table of Contents

of value proves to be inaccurate, the cost of completion is greater than expected, the length of time to complete and/or sell or lease the collateral property is greater than anticipated, or if there is a downturn in the local economy or real estate market, the property could have a value upon completion that is insufficient to assure full repayment of the loan. This could have a material adverse effect on the quality of the ADC loan portfolio, and could result in significant losses or delinquencies.

The Company seeks to minimize the risks involved in C&I lending by underwriting such loans on the basis of the cash flows produced by the business; by requiring that such loans be collateralized by various business assets, including inventory, equipment, and accounts receivable, among others; and by requiring personal guarantees. However, the capacity of a borrower to repay a C&I loan is substantially dependent on the degree to which his or her business is successful. In addition, the collateral underlying such loans may depreciate over time, may not be conducive to appraisal, or may fluctuate in value, based upon the results of operations of the business.

The ability of the Company’s borrowers to repay their loans, and the value of the collateral securing such loans, could be adversely impacted by continued or more significant economic weakness in its local markets as a result of increased unemployment, declining real estate values, or increased residential and office vacancies. This not only could result in the Company experiencing an increase in charge-offs and/or non-performing assets, but also could necessitate an increase in the provision for loan losses. These events, if they were to occur, would have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and its capital.

Loans Held for Sale

The Community Bank’s mortgage banking operation is one of the largest aggregators of one-to-four family loans for sale to GSEs in the nation. Community banks, credit unions, mortgage companies, and mortgage brokers use the subsidiary’s proprietary web-accessible mortgage banking platform to originate and close one-to-four family loans in all 50 states. The Company sells these loans, primarily servicing retained.

Prior to December 2010, the Company would originate one-to-four family loans for its customers in its branches and on its website on a pass-through, or conduit, basis, and would sell the loans to the third-party conduit shortly after they closed. Since then, the Company had been originating one-to-four family loans through its mortgage banking operation, directly and indirectly, rather than through the single third-party conduit with which it previously worked. The vast majority of the one-to-four family loans produced for the Company’s customers are aggregated with loans produced by its mortgage banking clients throughout the nation, and then sold.

The Company also services mortgage loans for various third parties. At September 30, 2012, the unpaid principal balance of serviced loans amounted to $16.6 billion. At December 31, 2011, the unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others amounted to $13.1 billion.

Asset Quality

The following table presents information regarding the quality of the Company’s non-covered loans held for investment at September 30, 2012:

 

(in thousands)     30-89 Days 
Past Due
   Non-
 Accrual 
    90 Days or More 
Delinquent and
Still Accruing
Interest
    Total Past 
Due
      Current       Total Loans
Receivable

Multi-family

      $ 33,644         $ 139,293         $ --         $ 172,937         $ 18,295,292          $ 18,468,229  

Commercial real estate

       4,631          54,641          --          59,272          7,133,922          7,193,194  

Acquisition, development, and construction

       --          24,813          --          24,813          358,882          383,695  

One-to-four family

       3,563          9,487          --          13,050          118,065          131,115  

Commercial and industrial

       5,831          17,342          --          23,173          559,399          582,572  

Other

       1,233          992          --          2,225          52,031          54,256  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total

      $ 48,902         $ 246,568         $ --         $ 295,470         $ 26,517,591          $ 26,813,061  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

16


Table of Contents

The following table presents information regarding the quality of the Company’s non-covered loans held for investment at December 31, 2011:

 

(in thousands)     30-89 Days 
Past Due
   Non-
 Accrual 
   90 Days or More
Delinquent and
Still Accruing
Interest
    Total Past 
Due
      Current       Total Loans
Receivable

Multi-family

      $ 46,702         $ 205,064         $ --         $ 251,766         $ 17,178,862          $ 17,430,628  

Commercial real estate

       53,798          68,032          --          121,830          6,733,414          6,855,244  

Acquisition, development, and construction

       6,520          29,886          --          36,406          409,265          445,671  

One-to-four family

       2,712          11,907          --          14,619          112,742          127,361  

Commercial and industrial

       1,223          8,827          --          10,050          589,936          599,986  

Other

       702          2,099          --          2,801          67,106          69,907  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total

      $ 111,657         $ 325,815         $ --         $ 437,472         $ 25,091,325          $ 25,528,797  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s non-covered loan portfolio by credit quality indicator at September 30, 2012:

 

(in thousands)    Multi-Family      Commercial  
Real Estate
  Acquisition,
 Development, and 
Construction
   One-to-Four 
Family
  Total
  Mortgage  
Segment
   Commercial 
and
Industrial
    Other     Total Other
Loan Segment

Credit Quality Indicator:

                               

Pass

       $18,170,382        $ 7,089,632        $ 350,651        $ 124,100        $ 25,734,765        $ 540,616        $ 53,263        $ 593,879  

Special mention

      54,093         31,223         5,900         301         91,517         19,772         --         19,772  

Substandard

      242,263         72,339         24,061         6,714         345,377         22,184         993         23,177  

Doubtful

      1,491         --         3,083         --         4,574         --         --         --  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

       $18,468,229        $ 7,193,194        $ 383,695        $ 131,115        $ 26,176,233        $ 582,572        $ 54,256        $ 636,828  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s non-covered loan portfolio by credit quality indicator at December 31, 2011:

 

(in thousands)    Multi-Family      Commercial  
Real Estate
  Acquisition,
 Development, and 
Construction
   One-to-Four 
Family
  Total
  Mortgage  
Segment
   Commercial 
and
Industrial
    Other     Total Other
Loan Segment

Credit Quality Indicator:

                               

Pass

       $17,135,461        $ 6,704,824        $ 399,811        $ 118,293        $ 24,358,389        $ 570,442        $ 67,808        $ 638,250  

Special mention

      58,134         64,802         6,489         --         129,425         13,234         --         13,234  

Substandard

      237,033         85,618         39,371         9,068         371,090         15,928         2,099         18,027  

Doubtful

      --         --         --         --         --         382         --         382  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

       $17,430,628        $ 6,855,244        $ 445,671        $ 127,361        $ 24,858,904        $ 599,986        $ 69,907        $ 669,893  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

The preceding classifications follow regulatory guidelines and can be generally described as follows: pass loans are of satisfactory quality; special mention loans have a potential weakness or risk that may result in the deterioration of future repayment; substandard loans are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged (these loans have a well-defined weakness and there is a distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss); and doubtful loans, based on existing circumstances, have weaknesses that make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable. In addition, one-to-four family residential loans are classified utilizing an inter-regulatory agency methodology that incorporates the extent of delinquency and the loan-to-value ratios. These classifications are the most current available and have been generally updated within the last twelve months.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

In accordance with GAAP, the Company is required to account for certain held-for-investment loan modifications or restructurings as Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”). In general, a modification or restructuring of a loan constitutes a TDR if the Company grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. Loans modified as TDRs are placed on non-accrual status until the Company determines that future collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured, which generally requires that the borrower demonstrate performance according to the restructured terms for a period of at least six consecutive months.

 

17


Table of Contents

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s TDRs as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

     September 30, 2012    December 31, 2011
(in thousands)    Accruing    Non-Accrual    Total    Accruing    Non-Accrual    Total

Loan Category:

                             

Multi-family

        $74,825           $117,683           $192,508           $60,454           $166,248           $226,702  

Commercial real estate

       37,473          39,881          77,354          3,389          39,054          42,443  

Acquisition, development, and construction

       --          11,734          11,734          --          15,886          15,886  

Commercial and industrial

       1,523          --          1,523          --          667          667  

One-to-four family

       --          1,101          1,101          --          1,411          1,411  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total

        $113,821           $170,399           $284,220           $63,843           $223,266           $287,109  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

In an effort to proactively manage delinquent loans, the Company has selectively extended to certain borrowers concessions such as rate reductions, extension of maturity dates, and forbearance agreements. As of September 30, 2012, loans on which concessions were made with respect to rate reductions and/or extension of maturity dates amounted to $252.9 million and loans on which forbearance agreements were reached amounted to $31.3 million.

The eligibility of a borrower for work-out concessions of any nature depends upon the facts and circumstances of each transaction, which may change from period to period, and involve judgment by Company personnel regarding the likelihood that the concession will result in the maximum recovery for the Company.

The financial effects of TDRs granted in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were as follows:

 

    Financial Effect of Modifications
    For the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2012
  For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
    Weighted Average Interest Rate       Weighted Average Interest Rate    
(dollars in thousands)   Number
of Loans
  Pre-
Modification
  Post-
Modification
  Charge-off
Amount
  Number
of Loans
  Pre-
Modification
  Post-
Modification
  Charge-off
Amount

Loan Category:

                               

Multi-family

      --         -- %       -- %      $ --         4         6.19 %       5.34 %      $ 188  

Commercial real estate

      --         --         --         --         3         6.30         4.50         --  

Acquisition, development, and construction

      --         --         --         --         --         --         --         --  

Other

      --         --         --         --         --         --         --         --  
   

 

 

             

 

 

     

 

 

             

 

 

 

Total/average

        --         -- %       -- %      $ --         7         6.28 %       4.71 %      $ 188  
   

 

 

             

 

 

     

 

 

             

 

 

 

As of September 30, 2012, there were no payment defaults on any loans that had been modified as TDRs during the preceding twelve months. A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 30 days contractually past due under the modified terms.

The Company does not consider a payment to be in default when the loan is in forbearance, or otherwise granted a delay of payment, when the agreement to forebear or allow a delay of payment is part of a modification. Subsequent to the modification, the loan is not considered to be in default until payment is contractually past due in accordance with the modified terms. In addition, the Company does consider a loan with multiple modifications of forbearance periods to be in default.

 

18


Table of Contents

Covered Loans

The following table presents the balance of covered loans acquired in the AmTrust and Desert Hills acquisitions as of September 30, 2012:

 

(dollars in thousands)      Amount      Percent of
Covered Loans

Loan Category:

         

One-to-four family

      $ 3,069,827          90.3%   

All other loans

       330,797          9.7       
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total covered loans

      $ 3,400,624          100.0%   
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

The Company refers to the loans acquired in the AmTrust and Desert Hills acquisitions as “covered loans” because the Company is being reimbursed for a substantial portion of losses on these loans under the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreements. Covered loans are accounted for under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 310-30, “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“ASC 310-30”), and initially measured at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the lives of the loans. Under ASC 310-30, purchasers are permitted to aggregate acquired loans into one or more pools, provided that the loans have common risk characteristics. A pool is then accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows.

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the outstanding balances of covered loans (representing amounts owed to the Company) were $4.1 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively. The carrying values of such loans were $3.4 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

At the respective acquisition dates, the Company estimated the fair values of the AmTrust and Desert Hills loan portfolios, which represented the expected cash flows from the portfolios discounted at market-based rates. In estimating such fair value, the Company (a) calculated the contractual amount and timing of undiscounted principal and interest payments (the “undiscounted contractual cash flows”); and (b) estimated the expected amount and timing of undiscounted principal and interest payments (the “undiscounted expected cash flows”). The amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows exceed the estimated fair value (the “accretable yield”) is accreted into interest income over the lives of the loans. The difference between the undiscounted contractual cash flows and the undiscounted expected cash flows is referred to as the “non-accretable difference.” The non-accretable difference represents an estimate of the credit risk in the loan portfolios at the acquisition date.

The accretable yield is affected by changes in interest rate indices for variable rate loans, changes in prepayment assumptions, and changes in expected principal and interest payments over the estimated lives of the loans. Changes in interest rate indices for variable rate loans increase or decrease the amount of interest income expected to be collected, depending on the direction of interest rates. Prepayments affect the estimated lives of covered loans and could change the amount of interest income and principal expected to be collected. Changes in expected principal and interest payments over the estimated lives of covered loans are driven by the credit outlook and actions that may be taken with borrowers.

The Company periodically evaluates the estimates of the cash flows it expects to collect. Expected future cash flows from interest payments are based on variable rates at the time of the periodic evaluation. Estimates of expected cash flows that are impacted by changes in interest rate indices for variable rate loans and prepayment assumptions are treated as prospective yield adjustments and included in interest income.

Changes in the accretable yield for covered loans were as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:

 

(in thousands)    Accretable Yield

Balance at beginning of period

       $1,365,978    

Reclassification to non-accretable difference

       (172,775)    

Accretion

       (135,531)    
    

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

        $1,057,672    
    

 

 

 

 

19


Table of Contents

The line item in the preceding table titled “reclassification to non-accretable difference” includes changes in cash flows the Company expects to collect due to changes in prepayment assumptions and changes in interest rates on variable rate loans. As of the Company’s last periodic evaluation, prepayment assumptions increased and, accordingly, future expected interest cash flows decreased. This resulted in a decrease in the accretable yield. In addition, these decreases were coupled with additional reductions in the expected cash flows from interest payments, as interest rates continued to be very low. As a result, a large percentage of the Company’s covered variable rate loans continue to reset at lower interest rates. Partially offsetting these decreases were increases in the expected principal and interest payments driven by better expectations relating to credit.

In connection with the AmTrust and Desert Hills transactions, the Company has acquired other real estate owned (“OREO”), all of which is covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements. Covered OREO is initially recorded at its estimated fair value on the acquisition date, based on independent appraisals less the estimated selling costs. Any subsequent write-downs due to declines in fair value are charged to non-interest expense, and partially offset by loss reimbursements under the FDIC loss sharing agreements. Any recoveries of previous write-downs are credited to non-interest expense and partially offset by the portion of the recovery that is due to the FDIC.

The FDIC loss share receivable represents the present value of the estimated losses on covered loans to be reimbursed by the FDIC. The estimated losses were based on the same cash flow estimates used in determining the fair value of the covered loans. The FDIC loss share receivable is reduced as losses on covered loans are recognized and as loss sharing payments are received from the FDIC. Realized losses in excess of acquisition-date estimates will result in an increase in the FDIC loss share receivable. Conversely, if realized losses are less than the acquisition-date estimates, the FDIC loss share receivable will be reduced.

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s covered loans 90 days or more past due at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

(in thousands)     September 30, 2012      December 31, 2011 

Covered Loans 90 Days or More Past Due:

         

One-to-four family

        $297,293           $314,821  

Other loans

       19,844          32,621  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total covered loans 90 days or more past due

        $317,137           $347,442  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s covered loans that were 30 to 89 days past due at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

(in thousands)     September 30, 2012      December 31, 2011 

Covered Loans 30-89 Days Past Due:

         

One-to-four family

           $84,471           $103,495  

Other loans

       7,449          8,494  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total covered loans 30-89 days past due

           $91,920           $111,989  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

At September 30, 2012, the Company had $91.9 million of covered loans that were 30 to 89 days past due, and covered loans of $317.1 million that were 90 days or more past due but considered to be performing due to the application of the yield accretion method under ASC 310-30. The remaining portion of the Company’s covered loan portfolio totaled $3.0 billion at September 30, 2012 and was considered current as of that date. ASC 310-30 allows the Company to aggregate credit-impaired loans acquired in the same fiscal quarter into one or more pools, provided that the loans have common risk characteristics. A pool is then accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Accordingly, loans that may have been classified as non-performing loans by AmTrust or Desert Hills are no longer classified as non-performing because, at the respective dates of acquisition, the Company believed that it would fully collect the new carrying value of these loans. The new carrying value represents the contractual balance, reduced by the portion that is expected to be uncollectible (referred to as the “non-accretable difference”) and by an accretable yield (discount) that is recognized as interest income. It is important to note that management’s judgment is required in reclassifying loans subject to ASC 310-30 as performing loans, and its judgment is dependent on having a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of the cash flows to be collected, even if the loan is contractually past due.

 

20


Table of Contents

The primary credit quality indicator for covered loans is the expectation of underlying cash flows. The Company recorded provisions for losses on covered loans of $2.8 million and $21.3 million, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. These provisions were largely due to credit deterioration in the acquired portfolios of one-to-four family and home equity loans. The provisions for losses on covered loans were largely offset by FDIC indemnification income of $2.3 million and $17.0 million, respectively, recorded in non-interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Note 5. Allowance for Loan Losses

The following tables provide additional information regarding the Company’s allowance for loan losses, based upon the method of evaluating loan impairment:

 

(in thousands)      Mortgage        Other        Total  

Allowance for Loan Losses at September 30, 2012:

              

Individually evaluated for impairment

       $    1,677          $        --          $    1,677  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

       124,017          13,321          137,338  

Acquired loans with deteriorated credit quality

       35,085          19,506          54,591  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total

       $160,779          $32,827          $193,606  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)      Mortgage        Other        Total  

Allowance for Loan Losses at December 31, 2011:

              

Individually evaluated for impairment

       $       490          $        --          $       490  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

       121,505          15,295          136,800  

Acquired loans with deteriorated credit quality

       14,227          19,096          33,323  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total

       $136,222          $34,391          $170,613  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

The following tables provide additional information regarding the methods used to evaluate the Company’s loan portfolio for impairment:

 

(in thousands)       Mortgage          Other          Total   

Loans Receivable at September 30, 2012:

              

Individually evaluated for impairment

       $     302,571          $     17,770          $     320,341  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

       25,873,662          619,058          26,492,720  

Acquired loans with deteriorated credit quality

       3,069,827          330,797          3,400,624  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total

       $29,246,060          $   967,625          $30,213,685  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)      Mortgage            Other            Total    

Loans Receivable at December 31, 2011:

            

Individually evaluated for impairment

     $     324,427           $       5,995           $     330,422   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

     24,534,477           663,898           25,198,375   

Acquired loans with deteriorated credit quality

     3,366,456           386,575           3,753,031   
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total

     $28,225,360           $1,056,468           $29,281,828   
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Non-Covered Loans

The following table summarizes activity in the allowance for losses on non-covered loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

     September 30,  
     2012         2011  
(in thousands)    Mortgage      Other      Total         Mortgage      Other      Total  

Balance, beginning of period

    $ 121,995          $ 15,295          $ 137,290           $ 140,834          $ 18,108          $ 158,942     

Charge-offs

     (35,542)          (6,217)          (41,759)           (73,994)          (9,485)          (83,479)    

Recoveries

     735           2,749           3,484            2,189           2,727           4,916     

Provision for loan losses

     38,506           1,494           40,000            53,287           5,713           59,000     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

    $ 125,694          $ 13,321          $ 139,015           $ 122,316          $ 17,063          $ 139,379     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-accrual loans amounted to $246.6 million and $325.8 million, respectively, at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. There were no loans over 90 days past due and still accruing interest at either of these dates.

 

21


Table of Contents

The following table presents additional information regarding the Company’s impaired loans at or for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:

 

(in thousands)   Recorded
  Investment  
   Unpaid
  Principal  
Balance
   Related
  Allowance  
   Average
Recorded
  Investment  
   Interest
Income
  Recognized  

Impaired loans with no related allowance:

                       

Multi-family

    $ 158,750        $ 176,801        $ --        $ 188,180        $ 2,642  

Commercial real estate

      79,744          81,237          --          69,544          1,030  

Acquisition, development, and construction

      22,643          27,015          --          24,538          636  

One-to-four family

      1,102          1,147          --          1,118          --  

Commercial and industrial

      17,769          24,999          --          9,840          1,749  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total impaired loans with no related allowance

    $ 280,008        $ 311,199        $ --        $ 293,220        $ 6,057  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:

                       

Multi-family

    $ 38,488        $ 39,368        $ 1,628        $ 30,423        $ 655  

Commercial real estate

      1,845          1,845          49          3,953          79  

Acquisition, development, and construction

      --          --          --          2,098          --  

One-to-four family

      --          --          --          --          --  

Commercial and industrial

      --          --          --          --          --  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total impaired loans with an allowance recorded

    $ 40,333        $ 41,213        $ 1,677        $ 36,474        $ 734  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total impaired loans:

                       

Multi-family

    $ 197,238        $ 216,169        $ 1,628        $ 218,603        $ 3,297  

Commercial real estate

      81,589          83,082          49          73,497          1,109  

Acquisition, development, and construction

      22,643          27,015          --          26,636          636  

One-to-four family

      1,102          1,147          --          1,118          --  

Commercial and industrial

      17,769          24,999          --          9,840          1,749  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

    $  320,341        $  352,412        $  1,677        $  329,694        $ 6,791  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

The following table presents additional information regarding the Company’s impaired loans at or for the year ended December 31, 2011:

 

(in thousands)   Recorded
  Investment  
   Unpaid
  Principal  
Balance
   Related
  Allowance  
   Average
Recorded
  Investment  
   Interest
Income
  Recognized  

Impaired loans with no related allowance:

                       

Multi-family

    $ 235,100        $ 244,684        $ --        $ 321,994        $ 3,435  

Commercial real estate

      49,258          52,152          --          63,032          1,397  

Acquisition, development, and construction

      26,680          27,143          --          42,600          1,141  

One-to-four family

      1,127          1,520          --          2,649          10  

Commercial and industrial

      5,995          10,240          --          6,442          60  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total impaired loans with no related allowance

    $ 318,160        $ 335,739        $ --        $ 436,717        $ 6,043  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:

                       

Multi-family

    $ 6,329        $ 6,899        $ 408        $ 10,893        $ 187  

Commercial real estate

      5,648          5,857          53          10,297          --  

Acquisition, development, and construction

      --          --          --          14,495          --  

One-to-four family

      285          373          29          71          --  

Commercial and industrial

      --          --          --          1,837          --  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total impaired loans with an allowance recorded

    $ 12,262        $ 13,129        $ 490        $ 37,593        $ 187  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total impaired loans:

                       

Multi-family

    $ 241,429        $ 251,583        $ 408        $ 332,887        $ 3,622  

Commercial real estate

      54,906          58,009          53          73,329          1,397  

Acquisition, development, and construction

      26,680          27,143          --          57,095          1,141  

One-to-four family

      1,412          1,893          29          2,720          10  

Commercial and industrial

      5,995          10,240          --          8,279          60  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

    $ 330,422        $  348,868        $ 490        $  474,310        $ 6,230  
   

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

22


Table of Contents

The interest income recorded on these loans was not materially different from cash-basis interest income.

Covered Loans

Under the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, covered loans are reported exclusive of the FDIC loss share receivable. The covered loans acquired in the AmTrust and Desert Hills acquisitions are, and will continue to be, reviewed for collectability based on the expectations of cash flows from these loans. Covered loans have been aggregated into pools of loans with common characteristics. In determining the allowance for losses on covered loans, the Company periodically performs an analysis to estimate the expected cash flows for each of the loan pools. The Company records a provision for loan losses on covered loans to the extent that the expected cash flows from a loan pool have decreased since the acquisition date. Accordingly, if there is a decrease in expected cash flows due to an increase in estimated credit losses, as compared to the estimates made at the respective acquisition dates, the decrease in the present value of expected cash flows is recorded as a provision for covered loan losses charged to earnings, and an allowance for covered loan losses is established. A related credit to non-interest income and an increase in the FDIC loss share receivable is recognized at the same time, and measured based on the loss sharing agreement percentages.

The following table summarizes activity in the allowance for losses on covered loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

     September 30,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Balance, beginning of period

   $ 51,771       $ 11,903   

Provision for loan losses

     2,820         8,708   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

   $ 54,591       $ 20,611   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 6. Borrowed Funds

The following table summarizes the Company’s borrowed funds at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

(in thousands)    September 30,
2012
   December 31,
2011

Wholesale borrowings:

         

FHLB advances

     $ 8,945,008        $ 9,314,193  

Repurchase agreements

       4,125,000          4,125,000  

Fed funds purchased

       100,000          --  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total wholesale borrowings

       13,170,008          13,439,193  

Junior subordinated debentures

       427,077          426,936  

Senior notes

       --          89,984  

Preferred stock of subsidiaries

       4,300          4,300  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total borrowed funds

     $ 13,601,385        $ 13,960,413  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

At September 30, 2012, the Company had $427.1 million of outstanding junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (“junior subordinated debentures”) held by nine statutory business trusts (the “Trusts”) that issued guaranteed capital securities. The capital securities qualified as Tier 1 capital of the Company at that date. However, with the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) in July 2010, the qualification of capital securities as Tier 1 capital is expected to be phased out over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2013 and ending January 1, 2016.

The Trusts are accounted for as unconsolidated subsidiaries in accordance with GAAP. The proceeds of each issuance were invested in a series of junior subordinated debentures of the Company and the underlying assets of each statutory business trust are the relevant debentures. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations under each trust’s capital securities to the extent set forth in a guarantee by the Company to each trust. The Trusts’ capital securities are each subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the debentures at their stated maturity or earlier redemption.

 

23


Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of the outstanding capital securities issued by each trust and the carrying amounts of the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to each trust as of September 30, 2012:

 

Issuer   Interest Rate of
Capital Securities
and Debentures
       Junior
Subordinated
Debenture
Carrying
Amount
  Capital
Securities
Amount
Outstanding
 

Date of

Original Issue

   Stated Maturity    First Optional
Redemption Date
                      (dollars in thousands)                 

Haven Capital Trust II

        10.250 %         $  23,333         $  22,550     May 26, 1999    June 30, 2029    June 30, 2009  (1)

Queens County Capital Trust I

        11.045           10,309         10,000     July 26, 2000    July 19, 2030    July 19, 2010  (2)

Queens Statutory Trust I

        10.600           15,464         15,000     September 7, 2000    September 7, 2030    September 7, 2010  (1)  

New York Community Capital Trust V

      6.000           143,941         137,591     November 4, 2002    November 1, 2051    November 4, 2007  (2)  

New York Community Capital Trust X

      1.989           123,712         120,000     December 14, 2006      December 15, 2036      December 15,  2011(3)  

LIF Statutory Trust I

        10.600           7,732         7,500     September 7, 2000    September 7, 2030    September 7, 2010  (1)  

PennFed Capital Trust II

        10.180           12,372         12,000     March 28, 2001    June 8, 2031    June 8, 2011(1)

PennFed Capital Trust III

      3.639           30,928         30,000     June 2, 2003    June 15, 2033    June 15, 2008  (3)

New York Community Capital Trust XI

      2.010           59,286         57,500     April 16, 2007    June 30, 2037    June 30, 2012  (3)
         

 

 

     

 

 

               
            $427,077         $412,141          
         

 

 

     

 

 

               

 

(1)

Callable at a premium from this date forward.

(2) Callable subject to certain conditions as described in the prospectus filed with the SEC on November 4, 2002.
(3) Callable from this date forward.

Other borrowings totaled $4.3 million at September 30, 2012, as compared to $94.3 million at December 31, 2011. The reduction reflects the maturity, on June 22nd, of $90.0 million of fixed rate senior notes that had been issued in 2008 under the FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.

Note 7. Mortgage Servicing Rights

The Company had mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) of $122.5 million and $117.0 million, respectively, at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Company has two classes of MSRs for which it separately manages the economic risk: residential and securitized.

Residential MSRs are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded as a component of non-interest income in each period. The Company uses various derivative instruments to mitigate the income statement-effect of changes in fair value due to changes in valuation inputs and assumptions regarding its residential MSRs. MSRs do not trade in an active open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company bases the fair value of its MSRs on the present value of estimated future net servicing income cash flows utilizing an internal valuation model. The Company estimates future net servicing income cash flows with assumptions that market participants would use to estimate fair value, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rates, default rates, refinance rates, servicing costs, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, and ancillary income. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions in the model to reflect market conditions and assumptions that a market participant would consider in valuing the MSR asset.

The value of MSRs at any given time is significantly affected by mortgage interest rates then currently available in the marketplace, which influence mortgage loan prepayment speeds. During periods of declining interest rates, the value of MSRs generally declines due to increasing prepayments attributable to increased mortgage refinancing activity. Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, the value of MSRs generally increases as mortgage refinancing activity declines.

Securitized MSRs are carried at the lower of the initial carrying value, adjusted for amortization or fair value, and are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. Such MSRs are periodically evaluated for impairment, based on the difference between their carrying amount and their current fair value. If it is determined that impairment exists, the resultant loss is charged against earnings.

 

24


Table of Contents

The following tables set forth the changes in residential and securitized MSRs for the periods indicated below:

 

     For the Three Months Ended
         September 30, 2012            September 30, 2011    
(in thousands)    Residential    Securitized    Residential    Securitized

Carrying value, beginning of period

       $136,176            $386            $126,771            $  886    

Additions

       28,178            --            13,200            --    

Increase (decrease) in fair value:

                   

Due to changes in valuation assumptions

       (23,720)          --            (32,547)          --    

Due to other changes(1)

       (18,394)          --            (12,410)          --    

Amortization

       --              (96)          --               (145)  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Carrying value, end of period

       $122,240            $ 290            $  95,014            $  741    
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes net servicing cash flows and the passage of time.

 

     For the Nine Months Ended
         September 30, 2012            September 30, 2011    
(in thousands)    Residential    Securitized    Residential    Securitized

Carrying value, beginning of period

       $116,416            $ 596            $106,186            $1,192    

Additions

       85,977            --            50,519            --    

Increase (decrease) in fair value:

                   

Due to changes in valuation assumptions

       (31,255)          --            (32,547)          --    

Due to other changes(1)

       (48,898)          --            (29,144)          --    

Amortization

       --            (306)          --            (451)  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Carrying value, end of period

       $122,240            $ 290            $  95,014            $    741    
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes net servicing cash flows and the passage of time.

The following table presents the key assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the Company’s residential MSRs at the dates indicated:

 

         September 30, 2012           December 31, 2011    

Weighted Average Expected Life

       56 months         69 months  

Constant Prepayment Speed

       17.7 %       14.2 %

Discount Rate

       10.5         10.0  

Primary Mortgage Rate to Refinance

       3.5         4.1  

Cost to Service (per loan per year):

        

Current

       $  53         $  53  

30-59 days or less delinquent

       103         103  

60-89 days delinquent

       203         203  

90-119 days delinquent

       303         303  

Over 120 days delinquent

       553         553  

As of September 30, 2012, there were no changes in assumed future servicing costs.

 

25


Table of Contents

Note 8. Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits

The following tables set forth certain disclosures for the Company’s pension and post-retirement plans for the periods indicated:

 

     For the Three Months Ended September 30,
     2012    2011
(in thousands)    Pension
Benefits
   Post-Retirement
Benefits
   Pension
Benefits
   Post-Retirement
Benefits

Components of net periodic expense (credit):

                   

Interest cost

     $ 1,471          $ 160          $ 1,491             $180   

Service cost

       --           2            --             

Expected return on plan assets

       (3,314)          --            (3,133)           --   

Unrecognized past service liability

       --           (62)           --            (62)  

Amortization of unrecognized loss

       2,434           126            1,190            103   
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net periodic expense (credit)

      $ 591          $ 226           $ (452)            $222   
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

     For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
     2012    2011
(in thousands)    Pension
Benefits
   Post-Retirement
Benefits
   Pension
Benefits
   Post-Retirement
Benefits

Components of net periodic expense (credit):

                   

Interest cost

     $ 4,414            $ 481          $ 4,473             $ 540   

Service cost

       --           5            --             

Expected return on plan assets

       (9,943)          --            (9,399)           --   

Unrecognized past service liability

       --           (187)           --            (187)  

Amortization of unrecognized loss

       7,303           379            3,569            308   
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net periodic expense (credit)

      $ 1,774            $ 678           $ (1,357)            $ 665   
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

As discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements presented in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company expects to contribute $1.3 million to its post-retirement plan to pay premiums and claims for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. The Company currently expects to contribute $30.0 million to its pension plan in 2012.

Note 9. Stock-Based Compensation

At September 30, 2012, the Company had a total of 18,987,673 shares available for grants as options, restricted stock, or other forms of related rights under the New York Community Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2012 Stock Incentive Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at its Annual Meeting on June 7, 2012. Included in this amount were 1,030,673 shares that were transferred from the New York Community Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Stock Incentive Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at its Annual Meeting on June 7, 2006 and reapproved at its Annual Meeting on June 2, 2011.

Under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, the Company granted 43,000 shares of restricted stock in the three months ended September 30, 2012, with an average fair value of $12.53 per share on the date of grant and a vesting period of five years. Under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, the Company granted 2,040,425 shares of restricted stock in the six months ended June 30, 2012, with an average fair value of $12.78 per share on the date of grant and a vesting period of five years. In addition, as of September 30, 2012, no options or shares have been granted under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. Compensation and benefits expense related to restricted stock grants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, and totaled $5.1 million and $4.2 million, respectively, in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $15.5 million and $12.1 million, respectively, in the nine months ended at those dates.

 

26


Table of Contents

A summary of activity with regard to restricted stock awards in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 is presented in the following table:

 

     For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
      Number of Shares     Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value

Unvested at beginning of year

       3,429,440           $ 16.11  

Granted

       2,083,425            12.78  

Vested

       (713,820)           16.58  

Cancelled

       (82,900)           14.15  
    

 

 

      

Unvested at end of period

       4,716,145            14.60  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

As of September 30, 2012, unrecognized compensation cost relating to unvested restricted stock totaled $55.4 million. This amount will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 3.3 years.

In addition, the Company had eight stock option plans at September 30, 2012: the 1993 and 1997 New York Community Bancorp, Inc. Stock Option Plans; the 1993 Haven Bancorp, Inc. Stock Option Plan; the 1998 Richmond County Financial Corp. Stock Compensation Plan; the 2001 Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. Stock-based Incentive Plan; the 1998 Long Island Financial Corp. Stock Option Plan; and the 2003 and 2004 Synergy Financial Group Stock Option Plans (all eight plans collectively referred to as the “Stock Option Plans”). All stock options granted under the Stock Option Plans expire ten years from the date of grant.

The Company uses the modified prospective approach to recognize compensation costs related to share-based payments at fair value on the date of grant, and recognizes such costs in the financial statements over the vesting period during which the employee provides service in exchange for the award. As there were no unvested options at any time during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 or the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company did not record any compensation and benefits expense relating to stock options during those periods.

The Company either issues new shares of common stock to satisfy the exercise of options, or the Company may also use common stock held in Treasury to satisfy the exercise of options. In the event Treasury stock is used, the difference between the average cost of Treasury shares and the exercise price is recorded as an adjustment to retained earnings or paid-in capital on the date of exercise. At September 30, 2012, there were 2,678,702 stock options outstanding. The number of shares available for future issuance under the Stock Option Plans was 11,040 at that date.

The status of the Stock Option Plans at September 30, 2012, and changes that occurred during the nine months ended at that date, are summarized below:

 

     For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
       Number of Stock  
Options
     Weighted Average  
Exercise Price

Stock options outstanding, beginning of year

       9,006,944           $ 15.60  

Granted

       --            --  

Exercised

       --            --  

Expired/forfeited

       (6,328,242)            15.14  
    

 

 

      

Stock options outstanding, end of period

       2,678,702            16.68  

Options exercisable, end of period

       2,678,702            16.68  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

The intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2012 was $204,000. There were no stock options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The intrinsic values of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $1.9 million.

 

27


Table of Contents

Note 10. Fair Value Measurements

The FASB has issued guidance that, among other things, has defined fair value, established a consistent framework for measuring fair value, and expanded disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or non-recurring basis. The guidance clarifies that fair value is an “exit” price, representing the amount that would be received when selling an asset, or paid when transferring a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value is thus a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the FASB established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

 

   

Level 1 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

   

Level 2 – Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

   

Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants use in pricing an asset or liability.

A financial instrument’s categorization within this valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following tables present assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and that were included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition at those dates:

 

     Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2012 Using
(in thousands)    Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
   Netting
Adjustments
   Total
Fair Value

Mortgage-Related Securities Available for Sale:

                        

GSE certificates

      $ --          $ 102,028          $ --        $ --         $ 102,028   

GSE CMOs

       --           86,417           --          --           86,417   

Private label CMOs

       --           18,101           --          --           18,101   
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total mortgage-related securities

      $ --          $ 206,546          $ --        $ --         $ 206,546   
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Other Securities Available for Sale:

                        

GSE debentures

      $ --          $ $11,068          $ --        $ --         $ 11,068   

State, county, and municipal

       --           1,326           --          --           1,326   

Capital trust notes

       --           16,196           17,375          --           33,571   

Preferred stock

       82,901           105           --          --           83,006   

Common stock

       40,408           2,589           --          --           42,997   
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total other securities

      $  123,309          $ 31,284          $ 17,375        $ --         $ 171,968   
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total securities available for sale

      $  123,309          $ 237,830          $ 17,375        $ --         $ 378,514   
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Other Assets:

                        

Loans held for sale

      $ --          $ 1,211,767          $ --        $ --         $  1,211,767   

Mortgage servicing rights

       --           --           122,240          --           122,240   

Derivative assets

       5,547           17,471           56,079          (16,609)          62,488   

Liabilities:

                        

Derivative liabilities

      $ (461)         $ (46,945)         $ --        $ 16,609         $ (30,797)  

 

28


Table of Contents
    Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
(in thousands)   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
  Netting
Adjustments
  Total
Fair Value

Mortgage-Related Securities Available for Sale:

                   

GSE certificates

     $ --       $ 102,645        $ --        $  --       $ 102,645   

GSE CMOs

      --         65,276          --         --         65,276   

Private label CMOs

      --         24,041          --         --         24,041   
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total mortgage-related securities

     $ --       $ 191,962        $ --        $  --       $ 191,962   
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Other Securities Available for Sale:

                   

GSE debentures

     $ --       $ 458,766        $ --        $  --       $ 458,766   

State, county, and municipal

      --         1,285          --         --         1,285   

Capital trust notes

      --         14,125          18,078         --         32,203   

Preferred stock

      --         195          --         --         195   

Common stock

      37,026         3,225          --         --         40,251   
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total other securities

     $  37,026       $ 477,596        $ 18,078        $  --       $ 532,700   
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total securities available for sale

     $  37,026       $ 669,558        $ 18,078        $  --       $ 724,662   
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Other Assets:

                   

Loans held for sale

     $ --       $ 1,036,918        $ --        $  --       $ 1,036,918   

Mortgage servicing rights

      --         --          116,416         --         116,416   

Derivative assets

      9,004         762          15,633         --         25,399   

Liabilities:

                   

Derivative liabilities

     $ (20)       $ (11,742)       $ --        $ --       $ (11,762)  

The Company reviews and updates the fair value hierarchy classifications for its assets on a quarterly basis. Changes from one quarter to the next that are related to the observability of inputs to a fair value measurement may result in a reclassification from one hierarchy level to another.

A description of the methods and significant assumptions utilized in estimating the fair values of available-for-sale securities follows:

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities, exchange-traded securities, and derivatives.

If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models. These pricing models primarily use market-based or independently sourced market parameters as inputs, including, but not limited to, yield curves, interest rates, equity or debt prices, and credit spreads. In addition to observable market information, models incorporate transaction details such as maturity and cash flow assumptions. Securities valued in this manner would generally be classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, and primarily include such instruments as mortgage-related and corporate debt securities.

In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. In valuing capital trust notes, which may include pooled trust preferred securities, collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), and certain single-issue capital trust notes, the determination of fair value may require benchmarking to similar instruments or analyzing default and recovery rates. Therefore, capital trust notes are valued using a model based on the specific collateral composition and cash flow structure of the securities. Key inputs to the model consist of market spread data for each credit rating, collateral type, and other relevant contractual features. In instances where quoted price information is available, the price is considered when arriving at a security’s fair value. Where there is limited activity or less transparency around the inputs to the valuation of preferred stock, the valuation is based on a discounted cash flow model.

Periodically, the Company uses fair values supplied by independent pricing services to corroborate the fair values derived from the pricing models. In addition, the Company reviews the fair values supplied by independent pricing services, as well as their underlying pricing methodologies, for reasonableness. The Company challenges pricing services’ valuations that appear to be unusual or unexpected.

 

29


Table of Contents

The Company carries loans held for sale originated by the Residential Mortgage Banking segment at fair value, in accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments.” The fair value of held-for-sale loans is primarily based on quoted market prices for securities backed by similar types of loans. The changes in fair value of these assets are largely driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to loan funding, and changes in the fair value of servicing associated with the mortgage loans held for sale. Loans held for sale are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

MSRs do not trade in an active open market with readily observable prices. The Company bases the fair value of its MSRs on the present value of estimated future net servicing income cash flows, utilizing an internal valuation model. The Company estimates future net servicing income cash flows with assumptions that market participants would use to estimate fair value, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rates, default rates, refinance rates, servicing costs, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, and ancillary income. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions in the model to reflect market conditions and assumptions that a market participant would consider in valuing the MSR asset. MSR fair value measurements use significant unobservable inputs and, accordingly, are classified within Level 3.

Exchange-traded derivatives that are valued using quoted prices are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. The majority of the Company’s derivative positions are valued using internally developed models that use readily observable market parameters as their basis. These are parameters that are actively quoted and can be validated by external sources, including industry pricing services. Where the types of derivative products have been in existence for some time, the Company uses models that are widely accepted in the financial services industry. These models reflect the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and market-based parameters such as interest rates, volatility, and the credit quality of the counterparty. Furthermore, many of these models do not contain a high level of subjectivity, as the methodologies used in the models do not require significant judgment, and inputs to the models are readily observable from actively quoted markets, as is the case for “plain vanilla” interest rate swaps and option contracts. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Derivatives that are valued based on models with significant unobservable market parameters, and that are normally traded less actively, have trade activity that is one-way, and/or are traded in less-developed markets, are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

The fair value of Interest Rate Lock Commitments (“IRLCs”) for residential mortgage loans that the Company intends to sell is based on internally developed models. The key model inputs primarily include the sum of the value of the forward commitment based on the loans’ expected settlement dates and the projected values of the MSRs, loan level price adjustment factors, and historical IRLC closing ratios. The closing ratio is computed by the Company’s mortgage banking operation and is periodically reviewed by management for reasonableness. Such derivatives are classified as Level 3.

While the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair values of certain financial instruments could result in different estimates of fair values at the reporting date.

 

30


Table of Contents

Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

The following tables include a roll-forward of the balance sheet amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (including changes in fair value) for financial instruments classified in Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy:

 

(in thousands)  

Fair Value

  Total Realized/Unrealized
Gains/(Losses)  Recorded in
  Issuances   Settlements  

Transfers

 

Fair Value

 

Change in
Unrealized Gains/

(Losses) Related to

  January 1,
2012
  Income   Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
      to/(from)
Level 3
  at Sept. 30,
    2012    
  Instruments Held at
September  30, 2012

Available-for-sale capital securities

    $ 18,078           $ --       $ 2,351       $ --           $--       $ (3,054 )       $ 17,375         $ 2,222  

Mortgage servicing rights

      116,416             (80,153 )       --         85,977           --         --         122,240           (29,890 )

Derivatives, net

      15,633             40,446         --         --           --         --         56,079           55,304  

 

(in thousands)   Fair Value   Total Realized/Unrealized
Gains/(Losses)  Recorded in
  Issuances   Settlements   Transfers   Fair Value   Change in
Unrealized Gains/
(Losses) Related to
  January 1,
2011
  Income   Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
      to/(from)
Level 3
  at Sept. 30,
    2011    
  Instruments Held at
September 30, 2011

Available-for-sale capital securities and preferred stock

    $ 34,808           $ (6,160 )     $ (10,163 )     $ --           $--       $ (2,090 )       $ 16,395         $ (16,323 )

Mortgage servicing rights

      106,186             (61,691 )       --         50,519           --         --         95,014           (61,691 )

Derivatives, net

      53             29,093         --         --           --         --         29,146           29,093  

The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and out of Levels 1, 2, and 3 at the end of the reporting period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company transferred certain trust preferred securities from Level 3 to Level 2 as a result of increased observable market activity for these securities. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, OTTI was recognized on certain preferred stock that had been classified as Level 3. There were no gains or losses recognized as a result of the transfer of securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 or 2011. There were no transfers of securities between Levels 1 and 2 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 or 2011.

 

31


Table of Contents

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:

 

(dollars in thousands)   Fair Value at
  Sept. 30, 2012  
  Valuation Technique  

  Significant Unobservable Inputs  

  Significant
Unobservable
Input Value

Capital trust notes

    $ 17,375     Discounted Cash Flow  

Weighted Average Discount Rate (1)

    5.40%
             

Mortgage Servicing Rights

      122,240     Discounted Cash Flow  

Weighted Average Constant Prepayment Rate (2)

  17.70    
       

Weighted Average Discount Rate

  10.50    

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

      56,079     Pricing Model  

Weighted Average Closing Ratio

  74.58    

 

(1) Derived from multiple interest rate scenarios that incorporate a spread to the London Interbank Offered Rate swap curve and market volatility.
(2) Represents annualized loan repayment rate assumptions.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s capital trust notes is the weighted average discount rate. The fair value of the capital trust notes will move in the opposite direction of the discount rate (i.e., if the discount rate decreases, the value of the capital trust notes will increase). The Company estimates the expected cash flows for such securities, and discounts them using the weighted average discount rates above to arrive at the estimated fair value.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s MSRs are the weighted average constant prepayment rate and the weighted average discount rate. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in significantly lower or higher fair value measurements. Although the constant prepayment rate and the discount rate are not directly interrelated, they will generally move in opposite directions.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s IRLCs is the closing ratio, which represents the percentage of loans currently in a lock position that management estimates will ultimately close. Generally, the fair value of an IRLC is positive if the prevailing interest rate is lower than the IRLC rate, and the fair value of an IRLC is negative if the prevailing interest rate is higher than the IRLC rate. Therefore, an increase in the closing ratio (i.e., higher percentage of loans estimated to close) will result in the fair value of the IRLC increasing if in a gain position, or decreasing if in a loss position. The closing ratio is largely dependent on the stage of processing that a loan is currently in, and the change in prevailing interest rates from the time of the rate lock.

 

32


Table of Contents

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Such instruments are subject to fair value adjustments under certain circumstances (e.g., when there is evidence of impairment). The following tables present assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and that were included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition at those dates:

 

    Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2012 Using
(in thousands)   Quoted Prices in
Active  Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable  Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
  Unobservable  Inputs  
(Level 3)
   Total Fair 
Value

Certain impaired loans

      $--         $        --         $82,451         $  82,451  

Other assets (1)

      --         42,978         --         42,978  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

      $--         $42,978         $82,451         $125,429  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

(1) Represents the fair value of OREO that was measured at fair value, based on the appraised value of the collateral, subsequent to its initial classification as OREO.

 

    Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
(in thousands)   Quoted Prices in
Active  Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant Other 
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
  Unobservable  Inputs  
(Level 3)
   Total Fair 
Value

Certain impaired loans

      $--         $        --         $72,582         $72,582  

Other assets (1)

      --         26,810         --         26,810  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

      $--         $26,810         $72,582         $99,392  
   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

(1) Represents the fair value of OREO that was measured at fair value, based on the appraised value of the collateral, subsequent to its initial classification as OREO.

The fair values of collateral-dependent impaired loans are determined using various valuation techniques, including consideration of appraised values and other pertinent real estate market data.

Other Fair Value Disclosures

Certain FASB guidance requires the disclosure of fair value information about the Company’s on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments. When available, quoted market prices are used as the measure of fair value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on present-value estimates or other valuation techniques. Such fair values are significantly affected by the assumptions used, the timing of future cash flows, and the discount rate.

Because assumptions are inherently subjective in nature, estimated fair values cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent market quotes. Furthermore, in many cases, the estimated fair values provided would not necessarily be realized in an immediate sale or settlement of such instruments.

 

33


Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the carrying values, estimated fair values, and the fair value measurement levels of financial instruments that were not carried at fair value on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

     September 30, 2012
               Fair Value Measurement Using
(in thousands)    Carrying
Value
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Financial Assets:

                      

Cash and cash equivalents

     $ 2,538,290        $ 2,538,290        $ 2,538,290       $ --       $ --    

Securities held to maturity

       4,765,694          5,004,397          --         4,948,553         55,844    

FHLB stock

       473,629          473,629          --         473,629         --    

Loans, net

       31,241,635          31,905,715          --         --         31,905,715    

Mortgage servicing rights

       290          290          --         --         290    

Financial Liabilities:

                      

Deposits

       24,521,623          24,551,306          15,430,601 (1)       9,120,705 (2)       --    

Borrowed funds

       13,601,385          15,113,925          --         15,113,925         --    

 

(1) Includes NOW and money market accounts, savings accounts, and non-interest-bearing accounts.
(2) Represents certificates of deposit.

 

     December 31, 2011
               Fair Value Measurement Using
(in thousands)    Carrying
Value
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Financial Assets:

                      

Cash and cash equivalents

     $ 2,001,737        $ 2,001,737        $ 2,001,737       $ --       $ --    

Securities held to maturity

       3,815,854          3,966,185          --         3,890,970         75,215    

FHLB stock

       490,228          490,228          --         490,228         --    

Loans, net

       30,152,154          30,755,121          --         --         30,755,121    

Mortgage servicing rights

       596          596          --         --         596    

Financial Liabilities:

                      

Deposits

     $ 22,274,130        $ 22,321,011        $ 14,900,867 (1)     $ 7,420,144 (2)     $ --    

Borrowed funds

       13,960,413          15,423,474          --         15,423,474         --    

 

(1) Includes NOW and money market accounts, savings accounts, and non-interest-bearing accounts.
(2) Represents certificates of deposit.

The methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair values for the Company’s financial instruments follow:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks and fed funds sold. The estimated fair values of cash and cash equivalents are assumed to equal their carrying values, as these financial instruments are either due on demand or have short-term maturities.

Securities Held to Maturity

If quoted market prices are not available for a specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. These pricing models primarily use market-based or independently sourced market parameters as inputs, including, but not limited to, yield curves, interest rates, equity or debt prices, and credit spreads. In addition to observable market information, pricing models also incorporate transaction details such as maturity and cash flow assumptions.

 

34


Table of Contents

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

Ownership in equity securities of the FHLB is restricted and there is no established market for their resale. The carrying amount approximates the fair value.

Loans

The loan portfolio is segregated into various components for valuation purposes in order to group loans based on their significant financial characteristics, such as loan type (mortgages or other) and payment status (performing or non-performing). The estimated fair values of mortgage and other loans are computed by discounting the anticipated cash flows from the respective portfolios. The discount rates reflect current market rates for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The estimated fair values of non-performing mortgage and other loans are based on recent collateral appraisals.

The methods used to estimate the fair value of loans are extremely sensitive to the assumptions and estimates used. While management has attempted to use assumptions and estimates that best reflect the Company’s loan portfolio and current market conditions, a greater degree of subjectivity is inherent in these values than in those determined in active markets. Accordingly, readers are cautioned in using this information for purposes of evaluating the financial condition and/or value of the Company in and of itself or in comparison with any other company.

In addition, these methods of estimating fair value do not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value described in ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”

Mortgage Servicing Rights

MSRs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company utilizes a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future cash flows. The model incorporates various assumptions, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rates, refinance rates, servicing costs, and ancillary income. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions in the model to reflect current market conditions and assumptions that a market participant would consider in valuing the MSR asset.

Deposits

The fair values of deposit liabilities with no stated maturity (i.e., NOW and money market accounts, savings accounts, and non-interest-bearing accounts) are equal to the carrying amounts payable on demand. The fair values of certificates of deposit (“CDs”) represent contractual cash flows, discounted using interest rates currently offered on deposits with similar characteristics and remaining maturities. These estimated fair values do not include the intangible value of core deposit relationships, which comprise a significant portion of the Company’s deposit base.

Borrowed Funds

The estimated fair value of borrowed funds is based either on bid quotations received from securities dealers or the discounted value of contractual cash flows with interest rates currently in effect for borrowed funds with similar maturities and structures.

Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments

The fair values of commitments to extend credit and unadvanced lines of credit are estimated based on an analysis of the interest rates and fees currently charged to enter into similar transactions, considering the remaining terms of the commitments and the creditworthiness of the potential borrowers. The estimated fair values of such off-balance-sheet financial instruments were insignificant at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

 

35


Table of Contents

Note 11. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of financial forward and futures contracts, IRLCs, and options. These derivatives relate to mortgage banking operations, MSRs, and other risk management activities, and seek to mitigate or reduce the Company’s exposure to losses from adverse changes in interest rates. These activities will vary in scope based on the level and volatility of interest rates, the type of assets held, and other changing market conditions.

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, the Company takes into account the impact of collateral and master netting agreements that allow it to settle all derivative contracts held with a single counterparty on a net basis, and to offset the net derivative position with the related collateral when recognizing derivative assets and liabilities. As a result, the Company’s Statements of Financial Condition could reflect derivative contracts with negative fair values included in derivative assets, and contracts with positive fair values included in derivative liabilities.

The Company held derivatives not designated as hedges with a notional amount of $6.5 billion at September 30, 2012. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are reflected in current-period earnings.

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s derivative financial instruments at September 30, 2012:

 

     September 30, 2012  
     Notional      Unrealized(1)  
(in thousands)    Amount      Gain      Loss  

Treasury options

   $ 450,000       $ 1,037       $ --   

Eurodollar futures

     200,000         --         195   

Forward commitments to sell loans/mortgage-backed securities

     2,577,086         --         46,575   

Forward commitments to buy loans/mortgage-backed securities

     1,015,000         17,101         --   

Interest rate lock commitments

     2,266,688         56,079         --   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total derivatives

   $ 6,508,774       $ 74,217       $ 46,770   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Derivatives in a net gain position are recorded as “other assets” and derivatives in a net loss position are recorded as “other liabilities” in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.

The Company uses various financial instruments, including derivatives, in connection with its strategies to reduce pricing risk resulting from changes in interest rates. Derivative instruments may include IRLCs entered into with borrowers or correspondents/brokers to acquire agency-conforming fixed and adjustable rate residential mortgage loans that will be held for sale. Other derivative instruments include Treasury options and Eurodollar futures. Gains or losses due to changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognized in current-period earnings.

The Company enters into forward contracts to sell fixed rate mortgage-backed securities to protect against changes in the prices of agency-conforming fixed rate loans held for sale. Forward contracts are entered into with securities dealers in an amount related to the portion of IRLCs that is expected to close. The value of these forward sales contracts moves inversely with the value of the loans in response to changes in interest rates.

To manage the price risk associated with fixed rate non-conforming mortgage loans, the Company generally enters into forward contracts on mortgage-backed securities or forward commitments to sell loans to approved investors. Short positions in Eurodollar futures contracts are used to manage price risk on adjustable rate mortgage loans held for sale.

The Company also purchases put and call options to manage the risk associated with variations in the amount of IRLCs that ultimately close.

In addition, the Company mitigates a portion of the risk associated with changes in the value of MSRs. The general strategy for mitigating this risk is to purchase derivative instruments, the value of which changes in the opposite direction of interest rates, thus partially offsetting changes in the value of our servicing assets, the value of which tends to move in the same direction as interest rates. Accordingly, the Company purchases Eurodollar futures and call options on Treasury securities and enters into forward contracts to purchase mortgage-backed securities.

 

36


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the periods indicated:

 

     Gain (Loss) Included in Mortgage Banking Income  
     For the Three Months  Ended
September 30,
     For the Nine Months  Ended
September 30,
 
(in thousands)    2012      2011      2012      2011  

Treasury options

     $      (600)           $  16,031           $    4,198           $  23,234     

Eurodollar futures

     (283)           (1,412)          (1,516)          (2,722)    

Forward commitments to buy/sell loans/mortgage-backed securities

     (14,471)           (24,314)          (16,648)          (40,345)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total gain (loss)

     $(15,354)           $  (9,695)          $(13,966)          $(19,833)    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 12. Segment Reporting

The Company’s operations are divided into two reportable business segments: Banking Operations and Residential Mortgage Banking. These operating segments have been identified based on the Company’s organizational structure. The segments require unique technology and marketing strategies and offer different products and services. While the Company is managed as an integrated organization, individual executive managers are held accountable for the operations of these business segments.

The Company measures and presents information for internal reporting purposes in a variety of ways. The internal reporting system presently used by management in the planning and measurement of operating activities, and to which most managers are held accountable, is based on organizational structure.

The management accounting process uses various estimates and allocation methodologies to measure the performance of the operating segments. To determine financial performance for each segment, the Company allocates capital, funding charges and credits, certain non-interest expenses, and income tax provisions to each segment, as applicable. Allocation methodologies are subject to periodic adjustment as the internal management accounting system is revised. Furthermore, business or product lines within the segments may change. In addition, because the development and application of these methodologies is a dynamic process, the financial results presented may be periodically revised.

The Company’s overall objective is to maximize shareholder value by, among other things, optimizing return on equity and managing risk. Capital is assigned to each segment, the total of which is equivalent to the Company’s consolidated total, on an economic basis, using management’s assessment of the inherent risks associated with the segment. Capital allocations are made to cover the following risk categories: credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, option risk, basis risk, market risk, and operational risk.

The Company allocates expenses to the reportable segments based on various factors, including the volume and amount of loans produced and the number of full-time equivalent employees. Income taxes are allocated to the various segments based on taxable income and statutory rates applicable to the segment.

Banking Operations Segment

Banking Operations serves individual and business customers by offering and servicing a variety of loan and deposit products and other financial services.

Residential Mortgage Banking Segment

The Residential Mortgage Banking segment originates, sells, aggregates, and services one-to-four family mortgage loans. Mortgage loan products include conventional and jumbo fixed- and adjustable-rate loans for the purpose of purchasing or refinancing one-to-four family residential properties. The Residential Mortgage Banking segment earns interest on loans held in the warehouse and fee income from the origination and servicing of loans, and recognizes gains or losses from the sale of such loans.

 

37


Table of Contents

The following tables provide a summary of the Company’s segment results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, on an internally managed accounting basis:

 

    For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
(in thousands)   Banking
Operations
       Residential
Mortgage Banking
       Total
Company

Non-interest income – third party(1)

    $ 28,451            $ 53,206          $ 81,657  

Non-interest income – inter-segment

      (3,558)             3,558            --  
   

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

      24,893              56,764            81,657  
   

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net interest income

      276,255              8,695            284,950  
   

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total net revenues

      301,148              65,459            366,607  

Provision for loan losses

      12,820              --            12,820  

Non-interest expense(2)

      133,855              19,466            153,321  
   

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Income before income tax expense

      154,473              45,993            200,466  

Income tax expense

      54,145              17,523            71,668  
   

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net income

    $ 100,328            $ 28,470          $ 128,798  
   

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Identifiable segment assets (period-end)

    $ 42,600,483            $ 1,493,312          $ 44,093,795  
   

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

 

     For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
(in thousands)    Banking
Operations
       Residential
Mortgage Banking
       Total
Company

Non-interest income – third party(1)

     $ 93,839            $ 148,019          $ 241,858  

Non-interest income – inter-segment

       (10,782)             10,782            --  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

       83,057              158,801            241,858  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net interest income

       846,709              23,311            870,020  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total net revenues

       929,766              182,112            1,111,878  

Provision for loan losses

       61,268              --            61,268  

Non-interest expense(2)

       400,952              57,975            458,927  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Income before income tax expense

       467,546              124,137            591,683  

Income tax expense

       166,124              47,296            213,420  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net income

     $ 301,422            $ 76,841          $ 378,263  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

Identifiable segment assets (period-end)

     $ 42,600,483            $ 1,493,312          $ 44,093,795  
    

 

 

        

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes ancillary fee income.
(2) Includes both direct and indirect expenses.

 

38


Table of Contents

The following tables provide a summary of the Company’s segment results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, on an internally managed accounting basis:

 

     For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
(in thousands)    Banking
Operations
        Residential
Mortgage Banking
        Total
Company

Non-interest revenue – third party(1)

     $ 32,801             $ 25,268           $ 58,069  

Non-interest revenue – inter-segment

       (5,131)              5,131             --  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Total non-interest revenue

       27,670               30,399             58,069  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Net interest income

       290,463               4,504             294,967  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Total net revenue

       318,133               34,903             353,036  

Provision for loan losses

       18,000               --             18,000  

Non-interest expense(2)

       134,478               18,138             152,616  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Income before income tax expense

       165,655               16,765             182,420  

Income tax expense

       57,394               5,276             62,670  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Net income

     $ 108,261             $ 11,489           $ 119,750  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Identifiable segment assets (period-end)

     $ 40,740,946             $ 1,228,082           $ 41,969,028  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

     For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
(in thousands)    Banking
Operations
        Residential
Mortgage Banking
        Total
Company

Non-interest revenue – third party(1)

     $ 117,186             $ 58,381           $ 175,567  

Non-interest revenue – inter-segment

       (14,677)              14,677             --  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Total non-interest revenue

       102,509               73,058             175,567  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Net interest income

       887,004               13,159             900,163  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Total net revenue

       989,513               86,217             1,075,730  

Provision for loan losses

       67,708               --             67,708  

Non-interest expense(2)

       400,376               53,986             454,362  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Income before income tax expense

       521,429               32,231             553,660  

Income tax expense

       179,672               11,603             191,275  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Net income

     $ 341,757             $ 20,628           $ 362,385  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

Identifiable segment assets (period-end)

     $ 40,740,946             $ 1,228,082           $ 41,969,028  
    

 

 

         

 

 

         

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes ancillary fee income.
(2) Includes both direct and indirect expenses.

 

39


Table of Contents

Note 13. Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2012-06, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Subsequent Accounting for an Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition Date as a Result of a Government-Assisted Acquisition of a Financial Institution (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), (“ASU No. 2012-06”). ASU No. 2012-06 amends FASB ASC 805-20, Business Combinations—Identifiable Assets and Liabilities, and Any Non-controlling Interest, formerly, SFAS No. 141(R), by adding guidance specifically related to the accounting for the support the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. or the National Credit Union Administration provide to buyers of failed banks. When a reporting entity recognizes an indemnification asset (in accordance with Subtopic 805-20) as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution and a change in the cash flows expected to be collected on the indemnification asset subsequently occurs (as a result of a change in cash flows expected to be collected on the assets subject to indemnification), the reporting entity should subsequently account for the change in the measurement of the indemnification asset on the same basis as the change in the assets subject to indemnification. Any amortization of changes in value should be limited to the contractual term of the indemnification agreement (that is, the lesser of the term of the indemnification agreement or the remaining life of the indemnified assets).

For public and non-public entities, the amendments in ASU No. 2012-06 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively to any new indemnification assets acquired after the date of adoption and to indemnification assets existing as of the date of adoption arising from a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution. The adoption of ASU No. 2012-06 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of condition or results of operations.

In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements.” The amendments in ASU No. 2012-04 make technical corrections, clarifications, and limited-scope improvements to GAAP. Amendments in ASU No. 2012-04 that do not have transition guidance are effective upon issuance and amendments that are subject to the transition guidance will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of condition or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.” ASU 2012-02 simplifies the guidance for testing the decline in the realizable value (impairment) of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill. Examples of intangible assets subject to the guidance include indefinite-lived trademarks, licenses, and distribution rights. The amendments allow an organization the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether or not it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. An organization electing to perform a qualitative assessment is no longer required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset unless the organization determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is “more likely than not” that the asset is impaired. ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of condition or results of operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” Under ASU 2011-08, entities can first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under this amendment, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determined, based on a qualitative assessment, that it was more likely than not that its fair value was less than its carrying amount. The amendment includes a number of events and circumstances for an entity to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 on January 1, 2012 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of condition or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” Under ASU 2011-05, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income, either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. For both choices, an entity is required to present each component of

 

40


Table of Contents

net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity, but does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income, or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied retroactively. Early adoption is permitted, because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures. The application of this guidance only affects the presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and will have no impact on its consolidated statement of condition or results of operations. In December 2011, the FASB delayed certain aspects of ASU 2011-05 that pertain to how and where reclassification adjustments are presented. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 is reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three and twelve months ended September 30, 2012.

 

41


Table of Contents

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the purpose of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” are used to refer to New York Community Bancorp, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries, including New York Community Bank and New York Commercial Bank (the “Community Bank” and the “Commercial Bank,” respectively, and collectively, the “Banks”).

Forward-Looking Statements and Associated Risk Factors

This report, like many written and oral communications presented by the Company and our authorized officers, may contain certain forward-looking statements regarding our prospective performance and strategies within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of said safe harbor provisions.

Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies, and expectations of the Company, are generally identified by use of the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “strive,” “try,” or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “may,” or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effects of our plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from anticipated results.

There are a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, that could cause actual conditions, events, or results to differ significantly from those described in our forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to:

 

   

general economic conditions, either nationally or in some or all of the areas in which we and our customers conduct our respective businesses;

   

conditions in the securities markets and real estate markets or the banking industry;

   

changes in real estate values, which could impact the quality of the assets securing the loans in our portfolio;

   

changes in interest rates, which may affect our net income, prepayment penalty income, mortgage banking income, and other future cash flows, or the market value of our assets, including our investment securities;

   

changes in the quality or composition of our loan or securities portfolios;

   

changes in our capital management policies, including those regarding business combinations, dividends, and share repurchases, among others;

   

our use of derivatives to mitigate our exposure to interest rate risk;

   

changes in competitive pressures among financial institutions or from non-financial institutions;

   

changes in deposit flows and wholesale borrowing facilities;

   

changes in the demand for deposit, loan, and investment products and other financial services in the markets we serve;

   

our timely development of new lines of business and competitive products or services in a changing environment, and the acceptance of such products or services by our customers;

   

changes in our customer base or in the financial or operating performances of our customers’ businesses;

   

any interruption in customer service due to circumstances beyond our control;

   

our ability to retain key members of management;

   

potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of companies we have acquired or may acquire in the future;

   

the outcome of pending or threatened litigation, or of other matters before regulatory agencies, whether currently existing or commencing in the future;

   

environmental conditions that exist or may exist on properties owned by, leased by, or mortgaged to the Company, including those conditions resulting from natural disasters;

 

42


Table of Contents
   

any interruption or breach of security resulting in failures or disruptions in customer account management, general ledger, deposit, loan, or other systems;

   

operational issues stemming from, and/or capital spending necessitated by, the potential need to adapt to industry changes in information technology systems, on which we are highly dependent;

   

the ability to keep pace with, and implement on a timely basis, technological changes;

   

changes in legislation, regulation, policies, or administrative practices, whether by judicial, governmental, or legislative action, including, but not limited to, the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and other changes pertaining to banking, securities, taxation, rent regulation and housing, financial accounting and reporting, environmental protection, and insurance, and the ability to comply with such changes in a timely manner;

   

changes in the monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System;

   

changes in accounting principles, policies, practices, or guidelines;

   

additional FDIC special assessments or required assessment prepayments;

   

any breach in performance by the Community Bank under our loss sharing agreements with the FDIC;

   

changes in our estimates of future reserves based upon the periodic review thereof under relevant regulatory and accounting requirements;

   

changes in regulatory expectations relating to predictive models we use in connection with stress testing and other forecasting, or in the assumptions on which such modeling and forecasting are predicated;

   

the ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel of any banks we may acquire into our operations, and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames;

   

changes in our credit ratings or in our ability to access the capital markets;

   

war or terrorist activities; and

   

other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, technological, and geopolitical factors affecting our operations, pricing, and services.

It should be noted that we routinely evaluate opportunities to expand through acquisitions and frequently conduct due diligence activities in connection with such opportunities. As a result, acquisition discussions and, in some cases, negotiations, may take place at any time, and acquisitions involving cash or our debt or equity securities may occur.

In addition, the timing and occurrence or non-occurrence of events may be subject to circumstances beyond our control.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which such statements were made.

 

43


Table of Contents

Reconciliations of Stockholders’ Equity and Tangible Stockholders’ Equity, Total Assets and Tangible Assets, and the Related Measures

Although tangible stockholders’ equity, adjusted tangible stockholders’ equity, tangible assets, and adjusted tangible assets are not measures that are calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), management uses these non-GAAP measures in their analysis of our performance. We believe that these non-GAAP measures are important indications of our ability to grow both organically and through business combinations and, with respect to tangible stockholders’ equity and adjusted tangible stockholders’ equity, our ability to pay dividends and to engage in various capital management strategies.

We calculate tangible stockholders’ equity by subtracting from stockholders’ equity the sum of our goodwill and core deposit intangibles (“CDI”), and calculate tangible assets by subtracting the same sum from our total assets. To calculate our ratio of tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets, we divide our tangible stockholders’ equity by our tangible assets, both of which include an amount for accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax (“AOCL”). AOCL consists of after-tax net unrealized gains (losses) on securities; certain other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses on securities; and pension and post-retirement obligations, and is recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Condition. We also calculate our ratio of tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets excluding AOCL, as its components are impacted by changes in market conditions, including interest rates, which fluctuate. This ratio is referred to below and later in this report as the ratio of “adjusted tangible stockholders’ equity to adjusted tangible assets.”

Neither tangible stockholders’ equity, adjusted tangible stockholders’ equity, tangible assets, adjusted tangible assets, nor the related tangible and adjusted tangible capital measures should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders’ equity or any other capital measure prepared in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which we calculate these non-GAAP capital measures may differ from that of other companies reporting measures of capital with similar names.

Reconciliations of our stockholders’ equity, tangible stockholders’ equity, and adjusted tangible stockholders’ equity; our total assets, tangible assets, and adjusted tangible assets; and the related capital measures at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 follow:

 

     September 30,
2012
     December 31,
2011
 
(in thousands)              

Stockholders’ Equity

     $  5,642,465            $  5,565,704      

Less: Goodwill

     (2,436,131)           (2,436,131)     

Core deposit intangibles

     (36,734)           (51,668)     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Tangible stockholders’ equity

     $  3,169,600            $  3,077,905      

Total Assets

     $44,093,795            $42,024,302      

Less: Goodwill

     (2,436,131)           (2,436,131)     

Core deposit intangibles

     (36,734)           (51,668)     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Tangible assets

     $41,620,930            $39,536,503      

Stockholders’ equity to total assets

     12.80%         13.24%   

Tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets

     7.62%         7.78%   

Tangible Stockholders’ Equity

     $3,169,600            $3,077,905      

Add back: Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

     57,674            71,910      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted tangible stockholders’ equity

     $3,227,274            $3,149,815      

Tangible Assets

     $41,620,930            $39,536,503      

Add back: Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

     57,674            71,910      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted tangible assets

     $41,678,604            $39,608,413      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted stockholders’ equity to adjusted tangible assets

     7.74%         7.95%   

 

44


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

We consider certain accounting policies to be critically important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, since they require management to make complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. The inherent sensitivity of our consolidated financial statements to these critical accounting policies, and the judgments, estimates, and assumptions used therein, could have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

We have identified the following to be critical accounting policies: the determination of the allowances for loan losses; the valuation of loans held for sale; the determination of whether an impairment of securities is other than temporary; the determination of the amount, if any, of goodwill impairment; and the determination of the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.

The judgments used by management in applying these critical accounting policies may be influenced by a further and prolonged deterioration in the economic environment, which may result in changes to future financial results. In addition, the current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in our judgments, estimates, and assumptions.

Allowances for Loan Losses

Allowance for Losses on Non-Covered Loans

The allowance for losses on non-covered loans is increased by provisions for non-covered loan losses that are charged against earnings, and is reduced by net charge-offs and/or reversals, if any, that are credited to earnings. Although non-covered loans are held by either the Community Bank or the Commercial Bank, and a separate loan loss allowance is established for each, the total of the two allowances is available to cover all losses incurred. In addition, except as otherwise noted below, the process for establishing the allowance for losses on non-covered loans is the same for each of the Community Bank and the Commercial Bank. In determining the respective allowances for loan losses, management considers the Community Bank’s and the Commercial Bank’s current business strategies and credit processes, including compliance with guidelines approved by the respective Boards of Directors with regard to credit limitations, loan approvals, underwriting criteria, and loan workout procedures.

The allowance for losses on non-covered loans is established based on our evaluation of the probable inherent losses in our portfolio in accordance with GAAP, and are comprised of both specific valuation allowances and general valuation allowances.

Specific valuation allowances are established based on management’s analyses of individual loans that are considered impaired. If a non-covered loan is deemed to be impaired, management measures the extent of the impairment and establishes a specific valuation allowance for that amount. A non-covered loan is classified as “impaired” when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect both the principal and interest due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. We apply this classification as necessary to non-covered loans individually evaluated for impairment in our portfolios of multi-family; commercial real estate; acquisition, development, and construction; and commercial and industrial loans. Smaller balance homogenous loans and loans carried at the lower of cost or fair value are evaluated for impairment on a collective, rather than individual, basis.

We generally measure impairment on an individual loan and determine the extent to which a specific valuation allowance is necessary by comparing the loan’s outstanding balance to either the fair value of the collateral, less the estimated cost to sell, or the present value of expected cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. A specific valuation allowance is established when the fair value of the collateral, net of the estimated costs to sell, or the present value of the expected cash flows is less than the recorded investment in the loan.

We also follow a process to assign general valuation allowances to non-covered loan categories. General valuation allowances are established by applying our loan loss provisioning methodology, and reflect the inherent risk in outstanding held-for-investment loans. This loan loss provisioning methodology considers various factors in determining the appropriate quantified risk factors to use to determine the general valuation allowances. The factors assessed begin with the historical loan loss experience for each of the major loan categories we maintain. Our

 

45


Table of Contents

historical loan loss experience is then adjusted by considering qualitative or environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing portfolio to differ from historical loss experience, including, but not limited to:

 

   

Changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices;

   

Changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of the portfolio, including the condition of various market segments;

   

Changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans;

   

Changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of non-accrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans;

   

Changes in the quality of our loan review system;

   

Changes in the value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans;

   

The existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations;

   

Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; and

   

The effect of other external factors, such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements, on the level of estimated credit losses in the existing portfolio.

By considering the factors discussed above, we determine quantifiable risk factors that are applied to each non-impaired loan or loan type in the loan portfolio to determine the general valuation allowances.

In recognition of prevailing macroeconomic and real estate market conditions, the time periods considered for historical loss experience continue to be the last three years and the current period. We also evaluate the sufficiency of the overall allocations used for the allowance for losses on non-covered loans by considering the loss experience in the current and prior calendar year.

The process of establishing the allowance for losses on non-covered loans also involves:

 

   

Periodic inspections of the loan collateral by qualified in-house and external property appraisers/inspectors, as applicable;

   

Regular meetings of executive management with the pertinent Board committee, during which observable trends in the local economy and/or the real estate market are discussed;

   

Assessment of the aforementioned factors by the pertinent members of the Boards of Directors and executive management when making a business judgment regarding the impact of anticipated changes on the future level of loan losses; and

   

Analysis of the portfolio in the aggregate, as well as on an individual loan basis, taking into consideration payment history, underwriting analyses, and internal risk ratings.

In order to determine their overall adequacy, each of the respective loan loss allowances is reviewed quarterly by management and by the Mortgage and Real Estate Committee of the Community Bank’s Board of Directors (the “Mortgage Committee”) or the Credit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Commercial Bank (the “Credit Committee”), as applicable.

We charge off loans, or portions of loans, in the period that such loans, or portions thereof, are deemed uncollectible. The collectability of individual loans is determined through an assessment of the financial condition and repayment capacity of the borrower and/or through an estimate of the fair value of any underlying collateral. Generally, the time period in which this assessment is made is within the same quarter that the loan is considered impaired and quarterly thereafter. For non-real estate-related consumer credits, the following past-due time periods determine when charge-offs are typically recorded: (1) closed-end credits are charged off in the quarter that the loan becomes 120 days past due; (2) open-end credits are charged off in the quarter that the loan becomes 180 days past due; and (3) both closed-end and open-end credits are typically charged off in the quarter that the credit is 60 days past the date we received notification that the borrower has filed for bankruptcy.

 

46


Table of Contents

The level of future additions to the respective non-covered loan loss allowances is based on many factors, including certain factors that are beyond management’s control such as changes in economic and local market conditions, including declines in real estate values, and increases in vacancy rates and unemployment. Management uses the best available information to recognize losses on loans or to make additions to the loan loss allowances; however, the Community Bank and/or the Commercial Bank may be required to take certain charge-offs and/or recognize further additions to their loan loss allowances, based on the judgment of regulatory agencies with regard to information provided to them during their examinations of the Banks.

Allowance for Losses on Covered Loans

We have elected to account for the loans acquired in the AmTrust Bank (“AmTrust”) and Desert Hills Bank (“Desert Hills”) acquisitions (i.e., our covered loans) based on expected cash flows. This election is in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 310-30, “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“ASC 310-30”). In accordance with ASC 310-30, we will maintain the integrity of a pool of multiple loans accounted for as a single asset and with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows.

Under our loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, covered loans are reported exclusive of the FDIC loss share receivable. The covered loans acquired in the AmTrust and Desert Hills acquisitions are, and will continue to be, reviewed for collectability based on the expectations of cash flows from these loans. Covered loans have been aggregated into pools of loans with common characteristics. In determining the allowance for losses on covered loans, we periodically perform an analysis to estimate the expected cash flows for each of the loan pools. We record a provision for losses on covered loans to the extent that the expected cash flows from a loan pool have decreased for credit-related items since the acquisition date. Accordingly, if there is a decrease in expected cash flows due to an increase in estimated credit losses compared to the estimates made at the respective acquisition dates, the decrease in the present value of expected cash flows will be recorded as a provision for covered loan losses charged to earnings, and the allowance for covered loan losses will be increased. A related credit to non-interest income and an increase in the FDIC loss share receivable will be recognized at the same time, and will be measured based on the loss sharing agreement percentages.

Please see Note 5, “Allowance for Loan Losses” for a further discussion of our allowance for losses on covered loans as well as additional information about our allowance for losses on non-covered loans.

Loans Held for Sale

We carry at fair value the one-to-four family mortgage loans we originate for sale to investors. The fair value of such loans is primarily based on quoted market prices for securities backed by similar types of loans. Changes in fair value, which are recorded as a component of mortgage banking income, are largely driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to loan funding, and changes in the fair value of servicing associated with mortgage loans held for sale. In addition, we use various derivative instruments to mitigate the economic effect of changes in the fair value of the underlying loans.

Investment Securities

The securities portfolio primarily consists of mortgage-related securities and, to a lesser extent, debt and equity (together, “other”) securities. Securities that are classified as “available for sale” are carried at their estimated fair value, with any unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in stockholders’ equity. Securities that we have the intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as “held to maturity” and carried at amortized cost, less the non-credit portion of OTTI recorded in AOCL.

The fair values of our securities—and particularly our fixed-rate securities—are affected by changes in market interest rates and credit spreads. In general, as interest rates rise and/or credit spreads widen, the fair value of fixed-rate securities will decline; as interest rates fall and/or credit spreads tighten, the fair value of fixed-rate securities will rise. We regularly conduct a review and evaluation of our securities portfolio to determine if the decline in the fair value of any security below its carrying amount is other than temporary. If we deem any decline in value to be other than temporary, the security is written down to its current fair value, creating a new cost basis, and the resultant loss (other than the OTTI on debt securities attributable to non-credit factors) is charged against earnings

 

47


Table of Contents

and recorded in non-interest income. Our assessment of a decline in fair value includes judgment as to the financial position and future prospects of the entity that issued the investment security, as well as a review of the security’s underlying collateral. Broad changes in the overall market or interest rate environment generally will not lead to a write-down.

In accordance with OTTI accounting guidance, unless we have the intent to sell, or it is more likely than not that we may be required to sell a security before recovery, OTTI is recognized as a realized loss on the income statement to the extent that the decline in fair value is credit-related. If there is a decline in fair value of a security below its carrying amount and we have the intent to sell it, or it is more likely than not that we may be required to sell the security before recovery, the entire amount of the decline in fair value is charged to earnings.

Goodwill Impairment

Goodwill is presumed to have an indefinite useful life and is tested for impairment, rather than amortized, at the reporting unit level, at least once a year. In addition to being tested annually, goodwill would be tested if there were a “triggering event.” The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. However, a company can, under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment”, first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under this amendment, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determined, based on a qualitative assessment, that it was more likely than not that its fair value was less than its carrying amount. The first step (“Step 1”) is used to identify potential impairment, and involves comparing each reporting segment’s estimated fair value to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a reporting segment exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step (“Step 2”) is performed to measure the amount.

Step 2 involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting segment for which impairment was indicated in Step 1. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business combination, i.e., by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting segment, as determined in Step 1, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities, and identifiable intangibles, as if the reporting segment were being acquired in a business combination at the impairment test date. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying amount of goodwill assigned to the reporting segment, there is no impairment. If the carrying amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting segment exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting segment, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted.

Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and are used as the basis for measurement, when available. Other acceptable valuation methods include present-value measurements based on multiples of earnings or revenues, or similar performance measures. Differences in the identification of reporting units and in valuation techniques could result in materially different evaluations of impairment.

For the purpose of goodwill impairment testing, management has determined that the Company has two reporting segments: Banking Operations and Residential Mortgage Banking. All of our recorded goodwill has resulted from prior acquisitions and, accordingly, is attributed to Banking Operations. There is no goodwill associated with Residential Mortgage Banking, as this segment was acquired in our FDIC-assisted AmTrust acquisition, which resulted in a bargain purchase gain. In order to perform our annual goodwill impairment test, we determined the carrying value of the Banking Operations segment to be the carrying value of the Company and compared it to the fair value of the Banking Operations segment as the fair value of the Company.

We performed our annual goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2011 and found no indication of goodwill impairment at that date.

Income Taxes

In estimating income taxes, management assesses the relative merits and risks of the tax treatment of transactions, taking into account statutory, judicial, and regulatory guidance in the context of our tax position. In

 

48


Table of Contents

this process, management also relies on tax opinions, recent audits, and historical experience. Although we use the best available information to record income taxes, underlying estimates and assumptions can change over time as a result of unanticipated events or circumstances such as changes in tax laws and judicial guidance influencing our overall or transaction-specific tax position.

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and the carryforward of certain tax attributes such as net operating losses. A valuation allowance is maintained for deferred tax assets that we estimate are more likely than not to be unrealizable, based on available evidence at the time the estimate is made. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we estimate future taxable income, considering the prudence and feasibility of tax planning strategies and the realizability of tax loss carryforwards. Valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets can be affected by changes to tax laws, statutory tax rates, and future taxable income levels. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or a portion of our net deferred tax assets in the future, we would reduce such amounts through a charge to income tax expense in the period in which that determination was made. Conversely, if we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net carrying amounts, we would decrease the recorded valuation allowance through a decrease in income tax expense in the period in which that determination was made. Subsequently recognized tax benefits associated with valuation allowances recorded in a business combination would be recorded as an adjustment to goodwill.

Recent Events

Dividend Payment

On October 23, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per share, payable on November 16, 2012 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 7, 2012.

Hurricane Sandy

The vast majority of the mortgage and other loans the Company originates for investment are collateralized by properties and, to a lesser extent, businesses located in New York City, as well as Long Island and New Jersey. Certain areas within these markets were severely impacted by Hurricane Sandy during the period from October 28, 2012 to October 31, 2012 and, accordingly, the ability of some borrowers to repay their loans may be adversely impacted by the damage caused by the storm. We are in the process of assessing the damage, if any, that may have occurred to the properties and businesses collateralizing our loans in the areas that were affected, and although our exposure to loss should be limited by the existence of required insurance, there is a risk that some of the collateral underlying our loans may be compromised.

In addition, New York City, Long Island, Westchester County, and New Jersey are home to 206 of our branches and most of our back-office locations, many of which experienced short-term service disruptions, primarily due to power outages, during and after the storm. With the exception of a few branches that were impacted by severe flooding, our branches did not sustain any significant damage. Given the minimal impact on our branch and back-office locations and our insurance coverage, we do not expect the cost of any repairs to be made to be material.

The Economic Environment

The national unemployment rate was 7.8% in September 2012, an improvement from the rate in June 2012 and September 2011, which was 8.2%. In Ohio, Florida, and Arizona, the unemployment rates declined to 6.5%, 8.6%, and 8.0%, respectively, in September 2012 from 7.4%, 9.0%, and 8.5%, respectively, in June, and from 8.5%, 10.6%, and 8.9%, respectively, in September of last year. In New York and New Jersey the unemployment rates declined to 8.2% and 9.2%, respectively, in September 2012 from 9.1% and 10.1%, respectively, in June, but were up from 7.8% and 8.9%, respectively, in September of last year.

In New York City, where the vast majority of the properties securing our held-for-investment loans are located, the unemployment rate declined to 8.8% in September 2012 from 10.3% and 9.1%, respectively, in June 2012 and September 2011. However, in Manhattan, where 41.4% of the properties securing our held-for-investment multi-family and commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans are located, the office vacancy rate was 10.6% in September 2012, as compared to 10.5% and 10.3% in June 2012 and September 2011, respectively.

Through August 2012, home prices rose 2.0% nationally from the year-earlier level, and also rose in three of the four primary markets we serve. Home prices rose 1.1%, 6.7%, and 18.8%, respectively, in greater Cleveland, greater Miami, and greater Phoenix, but fell 2.3% in greater New York. From July to August, home prices rose 0.9% on a nationwide basis, and 1.0%, 1.0%, 1.8%, and 0.7%, respectively, in greater Cleveland, greater Miami, greater Phoenix, and greater New York.

 

49


Table of Contents

Executive Summary

In the three months ended September 30, 2012, we generated a strong financial performance despite the challenges posed by the yield curve as the average ten-year Treasury rate declined to 1.64% from 2.41% in the year-earlier third quarter, and the two-year Treasury rate fell to 0.26% from 0.28%. We generated earnings of $128.8 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, in the current third quarter, as compared to $131.2 million, or $0.30 per diluted share, in the trailing quarter and $119.8 million, or $0.27 per diluted share, in the year-earlier three months.

Our earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were driven by the following factors:

Mortgage Banking Income

 

   

With the decline in market interest rates to historical lows, refinancing activity rose in the U.S. residential housing market served by our mortgage banking operation, and in the Metro New York market for our multi-family mortgage and CRE loans.

 

   

The rise in refinancing activity contributed to an increase in the production of one-to-four family loans for sale and, with it, an increase in mortgage banking income from originations. The volume of one-to-four family loans originated for sale rose $269.5 million linked-quarter and $1.1 billion year-over-year, to $2.9 billion, in the three months ended September 30, 2012. Similarly, income from originations rose $13.6 million and $35.6 million, respectively, to $66.5 million from the levels recorded in the trailing and year-earlier three months.

 

   

The benefit of the increase in income from originations was tempered by a servicing loss of $13.9 million, primarily reflecting a negative mark-to-market on our mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”), as refinancing activity rose. In the second quarter of 2012, we recorded servicing income of $5.4 million, and in the year-earlier quarter, we recorded a servicing loss of $4.8 million.

 

   

As a result, mortgage banking income totaled $52.6 million in the current three-month period, reflecting a linked-quarter reduction of $5.7 million and a $28.3 million increase from the year-earlier amount.

Net Interest Income

 

   

While net interest income fell $11.7 million linked-quarter and $10.0 million year-over-year, to $285.0 million, these declines were tempered by an increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets and a robust level of prepayment penalty income, as the historically low level of market interest rates encouraged refinancing in the market for our multi-family loans.

 

   

The volume of multi-family loans produced rose $357.8 million linked-quarter and $614.6 million year-over-year, to $1.6 billion, boosting the portfolio to $18.5 billion at September 30, 2012. Prepayment penalty income totaled $31.5 million in the current third quarter, as compared to $32.0 million and $12.1 million, respectively, in the trailing and year-earlier three months.

 

   

The declines in net interest income were also tempered by the continued decline in our average cost of funds. Largely reflecting the assumption of deposits from Aurora Bank FSB (“Aurora Bank”) on June 28, 2012, we reduced our average cost of deposits to 0.64% in the current third quarter, even as the average balance of interest-bearing deposits rose $1.9 billion sequentially to $22.4 billion. Although the average cost of borrowed funds rose during this time, the acquisition of very low-cost deposits in the Aurora Bank transaction led the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities to fall by ten basis points linked-quarter and nine basis points year-over-year, to 1.80%.

 

   

While the average balance of loans rose $135.8 million linked-quarter and $1.6 billion year-over-year, to $30.9 billion, the replenishment of the loan portfolio with lower-yielding credits contributed to linked-quarter and year-over-year reductions in the average yield on loans. Notwithstanding the contribution of prepayment penalty income, the average yield on loans fell 17 basis points linked-quarter and 35 basis points year-over-year, to 5.11%. In addition, the average yield on interest-earning assets declined to 4.90% in the current third quarter from 5.07% and 5.19%, respectively, in the earlier periods.

 

50


Table of Contents
   

Reflecting the same factors that contributed to the declines in net interest income, our net interest margin was 3.17% in the current third quarter, as compared to 3.30% and 3.33%, respectively, in the trailing and year-earlier three months. Prepayment penalty income accounted for 35 basis points of our current third-quarter margin, as compared to 36 and 14 basis points, respectively, in the earlier periods.

Provisions for Loan Losses

 

   

The provision for losses on non-covered loans was reduced to $10.0 million in the current third quarter from $15.0 million and $18.0 million, respectively, in the trailing and year-earlier three months.

 

   

The provision for losses on covered loans declined to $2.8 million in the current third quarter from $18.4 million in the second quarter of this year. No comparable provision was recorded in the third quarter of last year.

 

   

We record a provision for losses on covered loans when the quality of loans acquired in our FDIC-assisted transactions deteriorates to a greater degree than had been expected at the time of those transactions. Such provisions are largely offset by FDIC indemnification income, which is recorded in non-interest income during the same period of time. In the third quarter of 2012, we recorded FDIC indemnification income of $2.3 million, a reduction from $14.8 million in the second quarter of this year.

Operating Expenses

 

   

Operating expenses fell $2.0 million on a linked-quarter basis and rose $1.9 million year-over-year, to $148.5 million. The linked-quarter decline was attributable to a decrease in general and administrative (“G&A”) expense, primarily reflecting a reduction in the costs of managing and disposing of other real estate owned (“OREO”). Conversely, the year-over-year increase was primarily due to a $3.2 million rise in G&A expense, reflecting an increase in OREO-related costs. The latter increase was largely offset by a $2.5 million reduction in compensation and benefits expense.

The strength of our third quarter performance was also reflected in the quality of our assets and our solid capital:

Asset Quality

 

   

Asset quality improved for the eighth consecutive quarter as the balance of non-covered non-performing assets declined $8.8 million and $119.9 million, respectively, to $290.5 million, from the balances recorded at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The September 30, 2012 balance represented 0.71% of total non-covered assets, an improvement from 0.75% and 1.07%, respectively, at the earlier period-ends.

 

   

The decline in non-performing non-covered assets was attributable to reductions in both non-performing non-covered loans and non-covered OREO. Non-performing non-covered loans represented $246.6 million, or 0.92%, of total non-covered loans at the end of September, as compared to $252.0 million and $325.8 million, respectively, at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. OREO totaled $43.9 million at the end of September, as compared to $47.3 million and $84.6 million, respectively, at the earlier period-ends.

 

   

Net charge-offs totaled $8.9 million in the current third quarter, reflecting linked-quarter and year-over-year declines of $5.0 million and $4.2 million, respectively. The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans improved to 0.03% in the current third quarter from 0.05% in the trailing quarter and 0.04% in the year-earlier three months, non-annualized.

 

51


Table of Contents

Capital

 

   

Stockholders’ equity totaled $5.6 billion at the end of September, up $30.9 million from the June 30th balance and $76.8 million from the balance at December 31, 2011. The September 30th balance represented 12.80% of total assets and a book value per share of $12.85.

 

   

Tangible stockholders’ equity totaled $3.2 billion at the end of September, reflecting a three-month increase of $35.8 million and a nine-month increase of $91.7 million. The September 30th balance represented 7.62% of tangible assets and a tangible book value per share of $7.22. (Please see the discussion and reconciliations of stockholders’ equity and tangible stockholders’ equity, total assets and tangible assets, and the related measures that appear earlier in this report.)

 

   

Our capital strength was also reflected in our subsidiary banks’ regulatory capital measures, each of which exceeded the FDIC requirements for classification as “well-capitalized” banks. At September 30, 2012, the Community Bank had a leverage capital ratio of 8.29%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 12.69%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of 13.41%. For the Commercial Bank, the respective measures were 13.61%, 16.85%, and 17.45%.

Balance Sheet Summary

At September 30, 2012, we recorded total assets of $44.1 billion, reflecting a $606.4 million increase from the June 30th balance and a $2.1 billion increase from the balance at December 31, 2011. In addition to a $367.0 million increase in total loans, to $31.4 billion, the linked-quarter increase in total assets reflects an $879.1 million rise in total securities to $5.1 billion. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, loans and securities rose $1.1 billion and $603.7 million, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $2.5 billion at the end of September, down $622.4 million from the June 30th balance and up $536.6 million from the balance at December 31st.

Deposits totaled $24.5 billion at the end of September, down $475.0 million from the June 30th balance and up $2.2 billion from the balance at December 31st. While the nine-month increase largely reflects the deposits assumed in our transaction with Aurora Bank late in the second quarter, a portion of those deposits ran off in the third quarter, as had been expected, resulting in the three-month decline. Borrowed funds totaled $13.6 billion at the end of September, reflecting a three-month increase of $1.0 billion and a $359.0 million reduction from the balance at December 31st.

In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, stockholders’ equity rose $30.9 million and $76.8 million, respectively, to $5.6 billion, representing 12.80% of total assets and a book value per share of $12.85. Tangible stockholders’ equity totaled $3.2 billion at the end of September, reflecting a three-month increase of $35.8 million and a nine-month increase of $91.7 million. The September 30th balance represented 7.62% of tangible assets and a tangible book value of $7.22 per share. (Please see the discussion and reconciliations of stockholders’ equity and tangible stockholders’ equity, total assets and tangible assets, and the related measures that appear earlier in this report.)

Loans

Loans represented $31.4 billion, or 71.3%, of total assets at the end of September, reflecting a three-month increase of $367.0 million and a nine-month increase of $1.1 billion, or 4.9% annualized. Included in the balance at September 30, 2012 were covered loans of $3.4 billion; non-covered loans held for investment (“loans held for investment”) of $26.8 billion, representing 85.3% of the total; and non-covered loans held for sale (“loans held for sale”) of $1.2 billion.

Covered Loans

“Covered loans” refers to the loans we acquired in our FDIC-assisted AmTrust and Desert Hills acquisitions, and are referred to as such because they are covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Primarily reflecting repayments, covered loans declined $115.5 million and $352.4 million, respectively, from the balances at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, to $3.4 billion at September 30, 2012. Covered loans represented 10.8% of total loans at the end of September, as compared to 11.3% and 12.4%, respectively, at the earlier period-ends.

 

52


Table of Contents

One-to-four family loans represented $3.1 billion, or 90.3%, of total covered loans at the end of the third quarter, with all other types of covered loans representing $330.8 million, or 9.7%, combined. Covered one-to-four family loans include both fixed and adjustable rate loans. Covered other loans consist of CRE loans; acquisition, development, and construction (“ADC”) loans; multi-family loans; commercial and industrial (“C&I”) loans; home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”); and consumer loans.

At September 30, 2012, $2.4 billion, or 73.0%, of the loans in our covered loan portfolio were variable rate loans, and the weighted average interest rate on such loans was 3.88%. The interest rates on 87.2% of our covered variable rate loans at that date were scheduled to reprice within twelve months and annually thereafter. We expect such loans to reprice at lower interest rates. The interest rates on the variable rate loans in the covered loan portfolio are indexed to either the one-year LIBOR or the one-year Treasury rate plus a spread in the range of 2% to 5%, subject to certain caps.

The AmTrust and Desert Hills loss sharing agreements each require the FDIC to reimburse us for 80% of losses up to a specified threshold, and for 95% of losses beyond that threshold with respect to covered loans and covered OREO.

In the three months ended September 30 and June 30, 2012, we recorded provisions for losses on covered loans of $2.8 million and $18.4 million, respectively. No comparable provision was recorded in the third quarter of last year. In each case, the provisions were recorded due to credit quality deterioration in the acquired portfolios of one-to-four family loans and HELOCs, primarily.

The provisions for losses on covered loans recorded in the third and second quarters of 2012 were largely offset by FDIC indemnification income of $2.3 million and $14.8 million, recorded in non-interest income in the respective periods.

Geographical Analysis of the Covered Loan Portfolio

The following table presents a geographical analysis of our covered loan portfolio at September 30, 2012:

 

(in thousands)       

California

     $  603,353   

Florida

     586,046   

Arizona

     295,674   

Ohio

     218,864   

Massachusetts

     155,044   

Michigan

     151,363   

Illinois

     116,301   

New York

     107,963   

Nevada

     85,463   

Texas

     85,214   

Maryland

     81,927   

New Jersey

     76,904   

Colorado

     73,951   

Washington

     72,017   

All other states

     690,540   
  

 

 

 

Total covered loans

     $3,400,624   
  

 

 

 

Non-Covered Loans Held for Investment

At September 30, 2012, loans held for investment totaled $26.8 billion, representing 85.3% of total loans, 60.8% of total assets, and a $1.3 billion, or 5.0%, increase from the balance at December 31st. In addition to multi-family loans and CRE loans, the held-for-investment portfolio includes substantially smaller balances of ADC loans, one-to-four family loans, and other loans. C&I loans comprise the bulk of our “other” loan portfolio. The vast majority of our non-covered loans held for investment consist of loans that we originated, with the remainder consisting of loans we acquired in our business combinations prior to 2009.

 

53


Table of Contents

The three- and nine-month increases in held-for-investment loans were attributable to the continued decline in market interest rates to historically low levels, which triggered an increase in refinancing activity and property transactions, particularly in our multi-family lending niche.

Originations of held-for-investment loans totaled $6.1 billion and $6.6 billion, respectively, in the first nine months of 2012 and 2011, including $2.1 billion and $1.9 billion of loans originated in the third quarters of the respective years.

Multi-Family Loans

Multi-family loans are our principal asset, and non-luxury residential apartment buildings with below-market rents in New York City constitute our primary lending niche. Consistent with our emphasis on multi-family lending, multi-family loan originations represented $1.6 billion, or 79.9%, of the loans we produced for investment in the current third quarter, as compared to $1.3 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, in the trailing and year-earlier three months. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, multi-family loans represented $4.0 billion, or 64.9%, of loans produced for investment, as compared to $4.2 billion, or 62.6%, in the first nine months of last year.

At September 30, 2012, multi-family loans represented $18.5 billion, or 68.9%, of total loans held for investment, reflecting a three-month increase of $287.2 million and a nine-month increase of $1.0 billion. The average multi-family loan had a principal balance of $4.2 million at the end of September, as compared to $4.1 million and $4.0 million, respectively, at June 30th and December 31st.

The vast majority of our multi-family loans are made to long-term owners of buildings with apartments that are subject to rent regulation, and therefore feature below-market rents. Our borrowers typically use the funds we provide to make improvements to certain apartments, as a result of which they are able to increase the rents their tenants pay. In doing so, the borrower creates more cash flows to borrow against in future years. We also make loans to building owners seeking to expand their real estate holdings with the purchase of additional properties.

In addition to underwriting multi-family loans on the basis of the buildings’ income and condition, we consider the borrowers’ credit history, profitability, and building management expertise. Borrowers are required to present evidence of their ability to repay the loan from the buildings’ current rent rolls, their financial statements, and related documents.

Our multi-family loans typically feature a term of ten years, with a fixed rate of interest for the first five years of the loan, and an alternative rate of interest in years six through ten. The rate charged in the first five years is generally based on intermediate-term interest rates, plus a spread. During years six through ten, the loan resets to an annually adjustable rate that is tied to the prime rate of interest, as reported in The New York Times, plus a spread. Alternatively, the borrower may opt for a fixed rate that is tied to the five-year fixed advance rate of the Federal Home Loan Bank (the “FHLB”) of New York (the “FHLB-NY”), plus a spread. The fixed-rate option also requires the payment of an amount equal to one percentage point of the then-outstanding loan balance. In either case, the minimum rate at repricing is equivalent to the rate in the initial five-year term.

As the rent roll increases, the typical property owner seeks to refinance the mortgage, and generally does so before the loan reprices in year six. Notably, the expected weighted average life of the multi-family loan portfolio was 2.8 years at the end of September, as compared to 3.3 years at December 31, 2011.

Multi-family loans that refinance within the first five years are typically subject to an established prepayment penalty schedule. Depending on the remaining term of the loan at the time of prepayment, the penalties normally range from five percentage points to one percentage point of the then-current loan balance. If a loan extends past the fifth year and the borrower selects the fixed rate option, the prepayment penalties typically reset to a range of five points to one point over years six through ten.

Prepayment penalties are recorded as interest income and are therefore reflected in the average yields on our loans and assets, our interest rate spread and net interest margin, and the level of net interest income we record. No assumptions are involved in the recognition of prepayment penalty income, as such income is only recorded when cash is received.

 

54


Table of Contents

Our success as a multi-family lender partly reflects the solid relationships we have developed with the market’s leading mortgage brokers, who are familiar with our lending practices, our underwriting standards, and our long-standing practice of basing our loans on the cash flows produced by the properties. Because the multi-family market is largely broker-driven, the process of producing such loans is expedited, with loans generally taking four to six weeks to process, and the related expenses being substantially reduced.

At September 30, 2012, the vast majority of our multi-family loans were secured by rental apartment buildings, and 81.2% of our multi-family loans were secured by buildings in New York City, with Manhattan accounting for the largest share. Of the loans secured by buildings outside New York City, New York State was home to 5.0%, with New Jersey and Pennsylvania accounting for 7.4% and 2.9%, respectively. The remaining 3.5% of multi-family loans were secured by buildings outside these markets.

Our emphasis on multi-family loans is driven by several factors, including their structure, which reduces our exposure to interest rate volatility to some degree. Another factor driving our focus on multi-family lending has been the comparative quality of the loans we produce. Reflecting the nature of the buildings securing our loans, our underwriting standards, and the generally conservative loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios our multi-family loans feature at origination, a relatively small percentage of the multi-family loans that have transitioned to non-performing status have actually resulted in losses during the most recent downturn of the credit cycle, as well as historically.

We primarily underwrite our multi-family loans based on the current cash flows produced by the collateral property, with a reliance on the “income” approach to appraising the properties, rather than the “sales” approach. The sales approach is subject to fluctuations in the real estate market, as well as general economic conditions, and is therefore likely to be more risky in the event of a downward credit cycle turn. We also consider a variety of other factors, including the physical condition of the underlying property; the net operating income of the mortgaged premises prior to debt service and depreciation; the debt service coverage ratio, which is the ratio of the property’s net operating income to its debt service; and the ratio of the loan amount to the appraised value of the property. The multi-family loans we are originating today generally represent no more than 75% of the lower of the appraised value or the sales price of the underlying property, and typically feature an amortization period of up to 30 years. In addition to requiring a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 120% on multi-family buildings, we obtain a security interest in the personal property located on the premises, and an assignment of rents and leases.

Accordingly, while our multi-family lending niche has not been immune to the downturn of the credit cycle, we continue to believe that the multi-family loans we produce involve less credit risk than certain other types of loans. In general, buildings that are subject to rent regulation have tended to be stable, with occupancy levels remaining more or less constant over time. Because the rents are typically below market and the buildings securing our loans are generally maintained in good condition, we believe that they are reasonably likely to retain their tenants in adverse economic times. In addition, we underwrite our multi-family loans on the basis of the current cash flows generated by the underlying properties, and exclude any partial property tax exemptions and abatement benefits the property owners receive.

Commercial Real Estate Loans

CRE loans represented $7.2 billion, or 26.8%, of held-for-investment loans at the end of September, reflecting a linked-quarter increase of $35.5 million and a $338.0 million increase from the balance at December 31st. The average CRE loan had a principal balance of $4.4 million at September 30, 2012.

Originations of CRE loans totaled $292.2 million in the current third quarter, reflecting a linked-quarter decrease of $236.2 million and a year-over-year decrease of $423.5 million. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we originated CRE loans of $1.7 billion, as compared to $1.8 billion in the first nine months of last year. Included in the current nine-month amount were $916.3 million of loans that were originated in the first quarter, portions of which were subsequently participated out to other banks.

The CRE loans we produce are secured by income-producing properties such as office buildings, retail centers, mixed-use buildings, and multi-tenanted light industrial properties. At September 30, 2012, 74.5% of our CRE loans were secured by properties in New York City, primarily in Manhattan, while properties on Long Island and in New Jersey accounted for 11.6% and 6.4%, respectively.

 

55


Table of Contents

The pricing of our CRE loans is similar to the pricing of our multi-family credits, i.e., with a fixed rate of interest for the first five years of the loan that is generally based on intermediate-term interest rates, plus a spread. During years six through ten, the loan resets to an annually adjustable rate that is tied to the prime rate of interest, as reported in The New York Times, plus a spread. Alternately, the borrower may opt for a fixed rate that is tied to the five-year fixed advance rate of the FHLB-NY plus a spread. The fixed-rate option also requires the payment of an amount equal to one percentage point of the then-outstanding loan balance. In either case, the minimum rate at repricing is equivalent to the rate in the initial five-year term.

Prepayment penalties also apply, with five percentage points of the then-current balance generally being charged on loans that refinance in the first year, scaling down to one percentage point of the then-current balance on loans that refinance in year five. Our CRE loans tend to refinance within three to four years of origination. At September 30, 2012, the expected weighted average life of the CRE loan portfolio was 3.3 years, as compared to 3.4 years at December 31, 2011. If a loan remains outstanding in the sixth year, and the borrower selects the fixed-rate option, a schedule of prepayment penalties ranging from five points to one point begins again in year six.

The repayment of loans secured by commercial real estate is typically dependent on the successful operation and management of the underlying properties. To minimize our credit risk, we originate CRE loans in adherence with conservative underwriting standards, and require that such loans qualify on the basis of the property’s current income stream and debt service coverage ratio. The approval of a loan also depends on the borrower’s credit history, profitability, and expertise in property management, and generally requires a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 130% and a maximum LTV ratio of 65%. In addition, the origination of CRE loans typically requires a security interest in the furniture, fixtures, equipment, and other personal property of the borrower and/or an assignment of the rents and/or leases.

Acquisition, Development, and Construction Loans

To reduce our exposure to credit risk in a declining real estate market, we have limited our production of ADC loans to loans that have limited market risk and low LTV ratios, and are made to reputable borrowers who have significant collateral. As a result, ADC loans represented $57.1 million, or 0.9%, of the loans we produced for investment in the current nine-month period, including $9.0 million, or 0.4%, of the loans produced in the third quarter of this year. In addition, the portfolio of ADC loans represented $383.7 million, or 1.4%, of total loans held for investment at September 30, 2012.

At September 30, 2012, 56.1% of the loans in our ADC portfolio were for land acquisition and development; the remaining 43.9% consisted of loans that were provided for the construction of owner-occupied homes and commercial properties. Such loans are typically originated for terms of 18 to 24 months, and feature a floating rate of interest tied to prime, with a floor. They also generate origination fees that are recorded as interest income and amortized over the lives of the loans.

At the end of September, 72.6% of the loans in the ADC portfolio were for properties in New York City, with Manhattan accounting for 40.3% of New York City’s share. Long Island accounted for 14.7% of our ADC loans, with New Jersey accounting for 9.3%. Reflecting the limited extent to which ADC loans have been originated beyond our immediate market, 3.4% of our ADC loans are secured by properties beyond New Jersey and New York.

Because ADC loans are generally considered to have a higher degree of credit risk, especially during a downturn of the credit cycle, borrowers are required to provide a personal guarantee of repayment and completion. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recovered losses against personal guarantees of $2.9 million, including $921,000 in the third quarter of the year. In the first nine months of 2011, we recovered $101,000 from personal guarantees. The risk of loss on an ADC loan is largely dependent upon the accuracy of the initial appraisal of the property’s value upon completion of construction; the estimated cost of construction, including interest; and the estimated time to complete and/or sell or lease such property. If the appraised value proves to be inaccurate, the cost of completion is greater than expected, or the length of time to complete and/or sell or lease the collateral property is greater than anticipated, the property could have a value upon completion that is insufficient to assure full repayment of the loan. At September 30, 2012, 6.5% of the loans in our ADC loan portfolio were non-performing, as compared to 6.4% and 6.7%, respectively, at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

 

56


Table of Contents

When applicable, as a condition to closing an ADC loan, it is our practice to require that residential properties be pre-sold or that borrowers secure permanent financing commitments from a recognized lender for an amount equal to, or greater than, the amount of our loan. In some cases, we ourselves may provide permanent financing. We typically require pre-leasing for ADC loans on commercial properties.

One-to-Four Family Loans

We originate agency-conforming one-to-four family loans through our mortgage banking operation and aggregate those loans with others produced by our mortgage banking clients throughout the United States. These loans are generally sold, servicing retained, to government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”) and are further discussed under “Non-Covered Loans Held for Sale” later in this report. In addition to originating agency-conforming one-to-four family loans, our mortgage banking operation has periodically originated jumbo one-to-four family loans for sale, under contract, to other banks.

Accordingly, the vast majority of the one-to-four family loans in our portfolio of loans held for investment are loans that were acquired in our business combinations prior to December 2009. Reflecting the origination of a small number of jumbo one-to-four family loans for our own portfolio, the balance of one-to-four family loans held for investment rose $3.8 million since December 31, 2011 to $131.1 million at the end of September, and included $28.4 million of hybrid-rate jumbo loans.

Other Loans

Other loans represented $636.8 million, or 2.4%, of total held-for-investment loans, at the end of September, reflecting a $33.1 million reduction from the balance at December 31st. C&I loans represented $582.6 million, or 91.4%, of the September 30th balance, and were down $17.4 million from the year-end amount. Of the $336.5 million of other loans originated for investment during the current nine-month period, C&I loans represented $333.2 million, or 99.0%. Included in the latter amount were third quarter C&I loan originations of $93.2 million, representing 98.5% of other loans produced in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

The vast majority of our C&I loans are made to small and mid-size businesses in New York City and on Long Island, and are tailored to meet the specific needs of our borrowers. The loans we produce include term loans, demand loans, revolving lines of credit, letters of credit, and, to a lesser extent, loans that are partly guaranteed by the Small Business Administration. A broad range of C&I loans, both collateralized and unsecured, are made available to businesses for working capital (including inventory and accounts receivable), business expansion, the purchase of machinery and equipment, and other general corporate needs. In determining the term and structure of a C&I loan, several factors are considered, including its purpose, the collateral, and the anticipated sources of repayment. C&I loans are typically secured by business assets and personal guarantees of the borrower, and include financial covenants to monitor the borrower’s financial stability.

The interest rates on C&I loans can be fixed or floating, with floating rate loans being tied to prime or some other market index, plus an applicable spread. Our floating rate loans may or may not feature a floor rate of interest. The decision to require a floor on C&I loans depends on the level of competition we face for such loans from other institutions, the direction of market interest rates, and the profitability of our relationship with the borrower.

A benefit of C&I lending is the opportunity to establish full-scale banking relationships with our C&I customers. As a result, many of our borrowers provide us with deposits, and many take advantage of our fee-based cash management, investment, and trade finance services.

The remainder of the portfolio of other loans consists primarily of home equity loans and lines of credit, as well as a variety of consumer loans, most of which were originated by our pre-2009 merger partners prior to their joining the Company. We currently do not offer home equity loans or lines of credit.

 

57


Table of Contents

Lending Authority

The loans we originate for investment are subject to federal and state laws and regulations, and are underwritten in accordance with loan underwriting policies and procedures approved by the Mortgage Committee, the Credit Committee, and the respective Boards of Directors.

We also place a limit on the amount of loans that may be made to one borrower. At September 30, 2012, the largest concentration of loans to one borrower consisted of a $526.7 million multi-family loan provided by the Community Bank to Riverbay Corporation—Co-op City, a residential community with 15,372 units in the Bronx, New York, which was created under New York State’s Mitchell-Lama Housing Program in the late 1960s to provide affordable housing for middle-income residents of the State. The loan was originally made on September 30, 2004 and, as of September 30, 2012, has been current since origination. The interest rate on the loan was 5.75% at the latter date. We currently expect the Co-op City loan to prepay in the fourth quarter of 2012, and to receive prepayment penalty income of approximately $17.5 million as a result.

Geographical Analysis of the Portfolio of Non-Covered Loans Held for Investment (1)

The following table presents a geographical analysis of the multi-family, CRE, and ADC loans in our held-for-investment portfolio at September 30, 2012:

 

     At September 30, 2012  
     Multi-Family Loans      Commercial Real Estate
Loans
     Acquisition, Development,
and Construction Loans
 
(dollars in thousands)    Amount      Percent
of Total
     Amount      Percent
of Total
     Amount      Percent
of Total
 

New York City:

                 

Manhattan

     $  6,637,709         35.94%         $3,989,358         55.46%         $154,714         40.32%   

Brooklyn

     3,451,472         18.69            438,376         6.09            35,857         9.34      

Bronx

     2,842,938         15.39            178,870         2.49            22,743         5.93      

Queens

     1,946,631         10.54            680,819         9.47            56,408         14.70      

Staten Island

     123,464         0.67            68,317         0.95            8,899         2.32      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total New York City

     $15,002,214         81.23%         $5,355,740         74.46%         $278,621         72.61%   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Long Island

     402,365         2.18            831,361         11.56            56,465         14.72      

Other New York State

     516,638         2.80            161,964         2.25            --         --      

New Jersey

     1,359,914         7.36            463,320         6.44            35,609         9.28      

Pennsylvania

     533,601         2.89            235,216         3.27            --         --      

All other states

     653,497         3.54            145,593         2.02            13,000         3.39      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     $18,468,229         100.00%         $7,193,194         100.00%         $383,695         100.00%   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)     The vast majority of other loans held for investment are secured by properties and/or businesses in the Metro New York region.

Non-Covered Loans Held for Sale

Since 2010, we have been actively engaged in the origination and purchase of one-to-four family loans for sale, primarily to GSEs. Our mortgage banking operation serves approximately 900 clients—community banks, credit unions, mortgage companies, and mortgage brokers—who utilize our proprietary web-accessible mortgage banking platform to originate full-documentation, prime credit one-to-four family loans in all 50 states.

To a much lesser extent, we utilize our mortgage banking platform to originate jumbo loans under contract for sale to other financial institutions, a practice we initiated in the first quarter of 2011. Although the volume of jumbo loan originations has been immaterial, and we do not expect jumbo loans to become a material portion of the one-to-four family loans we produce for sale, we decided to originate jumbo loans to complement our position in the loan-origination marketplace.

Loans sold to financial institutions other than GSEs include standard representations and warranties that could require the repurchase of a loan due to a breach of contract. We take these loans into account in calculating our related representation and warranty reserve estimates.

 

58


Table of Contents

In the first nine months of 2012, originations of one-to-four family loans held for sale totaled $7.9 billion, as compared to $4.4 billion in the first nine months of the prior year. Included in the current nine-month amount were third-quarter originations of $2.9 billion, up $269.5 million from the second quarter volume and $1.1 billion higher than the volume produced in the year-earlier three months. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, $7.9 billion, or 99.45%, of the one-to-four family loans we originated for sale were agency-conforming loans and $43.4 million, or 0.55%, were non-conforming. Included in the respective nine-month amounts were $2.8 billion and $16.2 million of agency-conforming and non-conforming loans that were originated in the third quarter, reflecting 99.44% and 0.56%, respectively, of all one-to-four family loans originated for sale during those periods.

The increase in production in the third quarter of 2012 was fostered by the historically low level of interest rates on residential mortgages, an environment generally attributable to the Federal Reserve Bank’s most recent round of quantitative easing, QE3. With more homeowners refinancing and home purchase transactions holding steady, the average balance of loans held for sale rose to $1.1 billion in the current third quarter, from $859.7 million and $586.4 million, respectively, in the trailing and year-earlier three months.

To mitigate the risks inherent in originating and reselling residential mortgage loans, we utilize processes, proprietary technologies, and third-party software application tools that seek to ensure that the loans meet investors’ program eligibility, underwriting, and collateral requirements. In addition, compliance verification and fraud detection tools are utilized throughout the processing, underwriting, and loan closing stages to assist in the determination that the loans we originate and acquire are in compliance with applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. Controlling, auditing, and validating the data upon which the credit decision is made (and the loan documents created) substantially mitigates the risk of our originating or acquiring a loan that subsequently is deemed to be in breach of loan sale representations and warranties made by us to loan investors.

We require the use of our proprietary processes, origination systems, and technologies for all loans we close. Collectively, these tools and processes are known internally as our proprietary “Gemstone” system. By mandating usage of Gemstone for all table-funded loan originations, we are able to tightly control key risk aspects across the spectrum of loan origination activities. Our clients access Gemstone via secure Internet protocols, and initiate the process by submitting required loan application data and other required income, asset, debt, and credit documents to us electronically. Key data is then verified by a combination of trusted third-party validations and internal reviews conducted by our loan underwriters and quality control specialists. Once key data is independently verified, it is “locked down” within the Gemstone system to further ensure the integrity of the transaction.

In addition, all “trusted source” third-party vendors are directly connected to the Gemstone system via secure electronic data interfaces. Within the Gemstone system, these trusted sources provide key risk and control services throughout the origination process, including ordering and receipt of credit report information, independent collateral appraisals, private mortgage insurance, automated underwriting and program eligibility determinations, flood insurance determination, fraud detection, local/state/federal regulatory compliance, predatory or “high cost” loan reviews, and legal document preparation services. Our employees augment the automated system controls by performing audits during the process, which include the final underwriting of the loan file (the credit decision), and various other pre-funding and post-funding quality control reviews.

The agency-conforming one-to-four family loans we originate for sale to GSEs require that we make certain representations and warranties with regard to underwriting, documentation, and legal/regulatory compliance, and we may be required to repurchase a loan or loans from the GSEs if it is found that a breach of the representations and warranties has occurred. In such case, we would be exposed to any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loans that might or might not be realized in the future.

As governed by our agreements with the GSEs, the representations and warranties we make relate to several factors, including, but not limited to, the ownership of the loan; the validity of the lien securing the loan; the absence of delinquent taxes or liens against the property securing the loan as of its closing date; the process used to select the loan for inclusion in a transaction; and the loan’s compliance with any applicable criteria, including underwriting standards, loan program guidelines, and compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws.

We record a liability for estimated losses relating to these representations and warranties, which is included in “other liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Condition. The related expense is recorded in “mortgage banking income” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. At September 30, 2012, June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, the liabilities for estimated possible future losses

 

59


Table of Contents

relating to these representations and warranties were $7.5 million, $6.8 million, and $5.3 million, respectively. The methodology used to estimate the liability for representations and warranties is a function of the representations and warranties given, and considers a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, actual default experience; estimated future defaults; historical loan repurchase rates and the frequency and potential severity of defaults; probability that a repurchase request will be received; and the probability that a loan will be required to be repurchased.

The following table sets forth the activity in our representation and warranty reserve during the periods indicated:

Representation and Warranty Reserve

 

     Three Months  Ended
September 30,
   Nine Months  Ended
September 30,
     2012    2011    2012    2011
(in thousands)                    

Balance, beginning of period

       $6,816          $4,193          $5,320          $3,537  

Provision for repurchase losses:

                   

Loan sales

       724          446          2,220          1,102  

Change in estimates

       --          --          --          --  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

       $7,540          $4,639          $7,540          $4,639  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Because the level of mortgage loan repurchase losses is dependent on economic factors, investor demand strategies, and other external conditions that may change over the lives of the underlying loans, the level of the liability for mortgage loan repurchase losses is difficult to estimate and requires considerable management judgment. However, we believe the amount and range of reasonably possible losses in excess of our reserve is not material to our operations or to our financial condition or results of operations.

The following table sets forth our GSE repurchase requests during the periods indicated:

Repurchase Request Activity

 

     For the Three Months Ended September 30,
     2012    2011
(dollars in thousands)    Number of Loans    Amount (1)    Number of Loans    Amount (1)

Balance, beginning of period

       11           $ 2,370            8           $ 1,633    

New repurchase requests (2)

       17            4,104            52            11,857    

Successful rebuttal/rescission

       (20)           (4,036)           (26)           (5,072)   

Indemnifications (3)

       --            --            --            --    

Loan repurchases

       (1)           (243)           --            --    
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Balance, end of period (4)

       7           $ 2,195            34           $ 8,418    
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 
     For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
     2012    2011
(dollars in thousands)    Number of Loans    Amount (1)    Number of Loans    Amount (1)

Balance, beginning of period

       8           $ 1,583            1           $ 155   

New repurchase requests (2)

       68            15,850            70            15,823   

Successful rebuttal/rescission

       (64)           (14,231)           (36)           (7,262)   

Indemnifications (3)

       (3)           (585)           (1)           (298)   

Loan repurchases

       (2)           (422)           --            --    
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Balance, end of period (4)

       7           $ 2,195            34           $ 8,418    
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

(1) Represents the loan balance as of the repurchase request date.
(2) All requests are from GSEs and relate to one-to-four family loans originated for sale.
(3) The Company protects a GSE against future losses under an indemnification agreement.
(4) Of the seven period-end requests as of September 30, 2012, six were from Fannie Mae and one was from Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae allows 90 days to respond, whereas Freddie Mac allows 30 days. Failure to respond to a request in a timely manner could result in the Company having an obligation to repurchase the loan.

 

60


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the activity with regard to GSE loans indemnified for possible losses in the event of default, and loans purchased by the Community Bank in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012:

Indemnified and Repurchased Loan Activity

 

    

For the

Three Months Ended

September 30, 2012

  

For the

Nine Months Ended

September 30, 2012

    

 

 

 
(dollars in thousands)    Number
of Loans
   Amount    Number
of Loans
   Amount

Balance, beginning of period

                $1,684                    $1,084   

Indemnifications

       --           --                    585   

Repurchases

                243                    421   

Principal payoffs

       (4)          (842)          (4)          (842)  

Principal payments

       --           (13)          --           (176)  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Balance, end of period (1)

                $1,072                    $1,072   
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

(1)     Of the six indemnified and repurchased loans, four were performing at September 30, 2012.

Outstanding Loan Commitments

At September 30, 2012, we had outstanding loan commitments of $4.1 billion, reflecting a $1.4 billion increase from the level at December 31, 2011. Included in the September 30th amount were commitments to originate loans for investment of $1.8 billion and commitments to originate loans for sale of $2.3 billion, as compared to $1.6 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, at December 31st. Multi-family and CRE loans represented $1.3 billion of held-for-investment loan commitments at the end of September, while ADC loans and other loans represented $106.9 million and $402.9 million, respectively.

In addition to loan commitments, we had commitments to issue financial stand-by, performance, and commercial letters of credit totaling $188.9 million at September 30, 2012, as compared to $172.9 million at December 31st.

Financial stand-by letters of credit primarily are issued for the benefit of other financial institutions or municipalities on behalf of certain of our current borrowers, and obligate us to guarantee payment of a specified financial obligation.

Performance letters of credit are primarily issued for the benefit of local municipalities on behalf of certain of our borrowers. These borrowers are mainly developers of residential subdivisions with whom we currently have a lending relationship. Performance letters of credit obligate us to make payments in the event that a specified third party fails to perform under non-financial contractual obligations.

Commercial letters of credit act as a means of ensuring payment to a seller upon shipment of goods to a buyer. Although commercial letters of credit are used to effect payment for domestic transactions, the majority are used to settle payments in international trade. Typically, such letters of credit require the presentation of documents that describe the commercial transaction, and provide evidence of shipment and the transfer of title.

The fees we collect in connection with the issuance of letters of credit are included in “fee income” in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.

Asset Quality

Non-Covered Loans Held for Investment and Non-Covered Other Real Estate Owned

The Company’s asset quality reflected continued improvement, as non-performing non-covered loans declined to $246.6 million at the end of September from $252.0 million and $325.8 million, respectively, at June 30th and December 31st. Non-performing non-covered loans represented 0.92% of total non-covered loans at the end of September, as compared to 0.95% and 1.28%, respectively, at the earlier dates.

 

61


Table of Contents

While non-performing multi-family loans fell $17.4 million to $139.3 million over the course of the third quarter, the benefit was largely offset by the impact of an $11.9 million rise in non-performing other loans, to $18.3 million. In addition, while non-performing CRE and ADC loans reflected modest linked-quarter improvements, the benefit was offset by a modest rise in non-performing one-to-four family loans. The nine-month improvement in non-performing non-covered loans stemmed from four of the five loan categories, as non-performing multi-family loans fell $65.8 million and non-performing CRE, ADC, and one-to-four family loans fell $13.4 million, $5.1 million, and $2.4 million, respectively. The improvements in these four categories more than exceeded the impact of a $7.4 million increase in non-performing other loans.

A loan generally is classified as a “non-accrual” loan when it is over 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, we cease the accrual of interest owed, and previously accrued interest is reversed and charged against interest income. A loan is generally returned to accrual status when the loan is less than 90 days past due and we have reasonable assurance that the loan will be fully collectible.

At September 30, 2012, June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, all of our non-performing loans were classified as non-accrual loans.

The following table sets forth the changes in non-performing non-covered loans over the nine months ended September 30, 2012:

 

(in thousands)       

Balance at December 31, 2011

     $325,815    

New non-accrual in the period

     68,423    

Charge-offs

     (17,004)   

Transferred to other real estate owned

     (15,455)   

Loan payoffs, including dispositions and principal amortization

     (91,501)   

Restored to performing status

     (23,710)   
  

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2012

     $246,568    
  

 

 

 

We monitor non-accrual loans both within and beyond our primary lending area in the same manner. Monitoring loans generally involves inspecting and re-appraising the collateral properties; holding discussions with the principals and managing agents of the borrowing entities and/or retained legal counsel, as applicable; requesting financial, operating, and rent roll information; confirming that hazard insurance is in place or force-placing such insurance; monitoring tax payment status and advancing funds as needed; and appointing a receiver, whenever possible, to collect rents, manage the operations, provide information, and maintain the collateral properties.

It is our policy to order updated appraisals for all non-performing loans, irrespective of loan type, that are collateralized by multi-family buildings, CRE properties, or land, in the event that such a loan is more than 90 days past due, and if the most recent appraisal on file for the property is more than one year old. Appraisals are ordered annually until such time as the loan becomes performing and is returned to accrual status. It is not our policy to obtain updated appraisals for performing loans. However, appraisals may be ordered for performing loans when a borrower requests an increase in the loan amount, or when a borrower requests an extension of a maturing loan.

Non-performing non-covered loans are reviewed regularly by management and reported on a monthly basis to the Mortgage Committee, the Credit Committee, and the Boards of Directors of the Banks. In accordance with our charge-off policy, non-performing non-covered loans are written down to their current appraised values, less certain transaction costs. Workout specialists from our Loan Recovery Unit actively pursue borrowers who are delinquent in repaying their loans in an effort to collect payment. In addition, outside counsel with experience in foreclosure proceedings are retained to institute such action with regard to such borrowers.

Properties that are acquired through foreclosure are classified as OREO, and are recorded at the lower of the unpaid principal balance or fair value at the date of acquisition, less the estimated cost of selling the property. It is our policy to require an appraisal and environmental assessment of properties classified as OREO before foreclosure, and to re-appraise the properties on an as-needed basis until they are sold. We dispose of such properties as quickly and prudently as possible, given current market conditions and the property’s condition.

 

62


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2012, non-covered OREO totaled $43.9 million, reflecting a three-month reduction of $3.4 million and a $40.6 million, or 48.1%, reduction from the balance at December 31, 2011. Reflecting the improvements in non-performing non-covered loans and OREO, non-performing non-covered assets totaled $290.5 million at the end of September, representing a three-month decrease of $8.8 million and a nine-month decrease of $119.9 million, or 29.2%. The September 30th amount was equivalent to 0.71% of total non-covered assets, an improvement from 0.75% and 1.07%, respectively, at the prior period ends.

While the balance of loans 30 to 89 days past due fell $62.8 million to $48.9 million over the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the September 30th balance was $10.3 million higher than the balance at June 30, 2012. The nine-month improvement was largely attributable to a $13.1 million reduction in multi-family loans to $33.6 million and a $49.2 million reduction in CRE loans to $4.6 million. In addition, there were no 30 to 89 days past due ADC loans at the end of September, as compared to $6.5 million at December 31, 2011. The benefit of these reductions was only partly offset by a $5.1 million rise in other loans 30 to 89 days past due to $7.1 million and an $851,000 rise in one-to-four family loans 30 to 89 days past due to $3.6 million.

The three-month rise in loans 30 to 89 days past due was the result of a $6.1 million increase in multi-family loans, a $5.1 million increase in other loans, and an $816,000 rise in one-to-four family loans. These increases were only partly offset by a $1.7 million decrease in CRE loans.

Reflecting the nine-month improvements in non-performing assets and loans 30 to 89 days past due, total delinquencies declined to $339.4 million at September 30, 2012 from $522.0 million at December 31, 2011. The net effect of the three-month reduction in non-performing assets and the three-month rise in loans 30 to 89 days past due was a $1.5 million reduction in total delinquencies.

To mitigate the potential for credit losses, we underwrite our loans in accordance with credit standards that we consider prudent. In the case of multi-family and CRE loans, we look first at the consistency of the cash flows being generated by the property to determine its economic value, and then at the market value of the property that collateralizes the loan. The amount of the loan is then based on the lower of the two values, with the economic value more typically used.

The condition of the collateral property is another critical factor. Multi-family buildings and CRE properties are inspected from rooftop to basement as a prerequisite to approval by management and the Mortgage or Credit Committee, as applicable. A member of the Mortgage or Credit Committee participates in inspections on multi-family loans to be originated in excess of $4.0 million. Similarly, a member of the Mortgage or Credit Committee participates in inspections on CRE loans to be originated in excess of $2.5 million. Furthermore, independent appraisers, whose appraisals are carefully reviewed by our experienced in-house appraisal officers, perform appraisals on collateral properties.

In addition, we work with a select group of mortgage brokers who are familiar with our credit standards and whose track record with our lending officers is typically greater than ten years. Furthermore, in New York City, where the majority of the buildings securing our multi-family loans are located, the rents that tenants may be charged on certain apartments are typically restricted under certain rent-control or rent-stabilization laws. As a result, the rents that tenants pay for such apartments are generally lower than current market rents. Buildings with a preponderance of such rent-regulated apartments are less likely to experience vacancies in times of economic adversity.

To further manage our credit risk, our lending policies limit the amount of credit granted to any one borrower, and typically require a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 120% for multi-family loans and 130% for CRE loans. We typically will lend up to 75% of the appraised value on multi-family buildings and up to 60% on commercial properties. Exceptions to these LTV limitations are reviewed on a case-by-case basis, requiring the approval of the Mortgage or Credit Committee, as applicable.

The repayment of loans secured by commercial real estate is typically dependent on the successful operation and management of the underlying properties. To minimize our credit risk, we originate CRE loans in adherence with conservative underwriting standards, and require that such loans qualify on the basis of the property’s current income stream and debt service coverage ratio. The approval of a loan also depends on the borrower’s credit history, profitability, and expertise in property management.

 

63


Table of Contents

Although the reasons for a loan to default will vary from credit to credit, our multi-family and CRE loans, in particular, typically have not resulted in significant losses. Such loans are generally originated at conservative LTV ratios, as previously stated. Furthermore, in the case of multi-family loans, the cash flows generated by the properties generally have significant value.

The Boards of Directors also take part in the ADC lending process, with all ADC loans requiring the approval of the Mortgage or Credit Committee, as applicable. In addition, a member of the pertinent committee participates in inspections when the loan amount exceeds $2.5 million. ADC loans primarily have been made to well-established builders who have borrowed from us in the past. We typically lend up to 75% of the estimated as-completed market value of multi-family and residential tract projects; however, in the case of home construction loans to individuals, the limit is 80%. With respect to commercial construction loans, which are not our primary focus, we typically lend up to 65% of the estimated as-completed market value of the property. Credit risk is also managed through the loan disbursement process. Loan proceeds are disbursed periodically in increments as construction progresses, and as warranted by inspection reports provided to us by our own lending officers and/or consulting engineers.

Our loan portfolio has been structured to manage our exposure to both credit and interest rate risk. The vast majority of the loans in our portfolio are intermediate-term credits, with multi-family and CRE loans typically repaying or refinancing within three to four years of origination, and the duration of ADC loans ranging up to 36 months, with 18 to 24 months more the norm. Furthermore, our multi-family loans are largely secured by buildings with rent-regulated apartments that tend to maintain a high level of occupancy, regardless of economic conditions in our marketplace.

C&I loans are typically underwritten on the basis of the cash flows produced by the borrower’s business, and are generally collateralized by various business assets, including, but not limited to, inventory, equipment, and accounts receivable. As a result, the capacity of the borrower to repay is substantially dependent on the degree to which the business is successful. Furthermore, the collateral underlying the loan may depreciate over time, may not be conducive to appraisal, and may fluctuate in value, based upon the operating results of the business. Accordingly, personal guarantees are also a normal requirement for C&I loans.

The procedures we follow with respect to delinquent loans are generally consistent across all categories, with late charges assessed, and notices mailed to the borrower, at specified dates. We attempt to reach the borrower by telephone to ascertain the reasons for delinquency and the prospects for repayment. When contact is made with a borrower at any time prior to foreclosure or recovery against collateral property, we attempt to obtain full payment, and will consider a repayment schedule to avoid taking such action. Delinquencies are addressed by our Loan Recovery Unit and every effort is made to collect, rather than initiate foreclosure proceedings.

Fair values for all multi-family buildings, CRE properties, and land are determined based on the appraised value. If an appraisal is more than one year old and the loan is classified as either non-performing or as an accruing troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), then an updated appraisal is required to determine fair value. Estimated disposition costs are deducted from the fair value of the property to determine estimated net realizable value. In the instance of an outdated appraisal on an impaired loan, we adjust the original appraisal by using a third-party index value to determine the extent of impairment until an updated appraisal is received.

While we strive to originate loans that will perform in accordance with their original terms, the severity of the credit cycle that began in 2008 resulted in a greater number of loans transitioning to non-accrual status and a greater volume of net charge-offs than we incurred before the downward cycle turn. However, the balance of non-performing loans has now declined for eight consecutive quarters and the volume of net charge-offs has now declined for three consecutive quarters.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net charge-offs declined to $38.3 million from $78.6 million in the year-earlier nine months. The current nine-month amount represented 0.12% of average assets, an improvement from 0.27% in the first nine months of last year. (Each of these measures is non-annualized.) Included in the respective nine-month amounts were third-quarter net charge-offs of $8.9 million and $13.1 million, equivalent to 0.03% and 0.04% of average loans (non-annualized), respectively.

 

64


Table of Contents

Multi-family and CRE loans represented $24.1 million and $4.9 million, respectively, of net charge-offs in the current nine-month period, including $5.9 million and $318,000, respectively, that were recorded in the third quarter of this year. ADC and other loans accounted for $5.9 million and $3.5 million of net charge-offs in the current nine-month period, including $39,000 and $2.6 million, respectively, that were recorded in the current three-month period. Conversely, we recorded a net recovery of $96,000 on one-to-four family loans in the current nine-month period, including net recoveries of $24,000 in the third quarter of this year.

Reflecting the $40.0 million provision for losses on non-covered loans and the $38.3 million of net charge-offs recorded in the current nine-month period, our allowance for losses on non-covered loans rose $1.7 million to $139.0 million at the end of September from $137.3 million at December 31, 2011. The September 30th balance represented 56.38% of non-performing non-covered loans, an increase from 42.14% at December 31st.

Based upon all relevant and available information at the end of the third quarter, management believes that the allowance for losses on non-covered loans was appropriate at that date.

Historically, our level of charge-offs has been relatively low in adverse credit cycles, even when the volume of non-performing loans has increased. This distinction has largely been due to the nature of our primary lending niche (multi-family loans collateralized by non-luxury apartment buildings in New York City that feature below-market rents), and to our conservative underwriting practices that require, among other things, low LTV ratios.

Reflecting the strength of the underlying collateral for these loans and the collateral structure, a relatively small percentage of our non-performing multi-family loans have resulted in losses over time. Low LTV ratios provide a greater likelihood of full recovery and reduce the possibility of incurring a severe loss on a credit. Furthermore, low LTV ratios generally have resulted in our having fewer loans with the potential for the borrower to “walk away” from the property. Although borrowers may default on loan payments, they have a greater incentive to protect their equity in the collateral property and to return their loans to performing status.

Given that our CRE loans are underwritten in accordance with underwriting standards that are similar to those that apply to our multi-family credits, an increase in non-performing CRE loans historically has not resulted in a corresponding increase in losses on such loans.

To further mitigate our credit risk, we continue to de-emphasize the production of ADC and other loans, as well as one-to-four family loans, for portfolio. At September 30, 2012, ADC loans, one-to-four family loans, and other loans represented 1.43%, 0.49%, and 2.37%, respectively, of total non-covered loans held for investment, as compared to 1.75%, 0.50%, and 2.62%, respectively, at December 31, 2011. At September 30, 2012, 6.47%, 7.24%, and 2.88% of ADC loans, one-to-four family loans, and other loans, respectively, were non-performing loans.

In view of these factors, we do not believe that the level of our non-performing non-covered loans will result in a comparable level of loan losses, and will not necessarily require a significant increase in our loan loss provision or allowance for non-covered loans in any given period. As indicated, non-performing non-covered loans represented 0.92% of total non-covered loans at the end of the third quarter; the ratio of net charge-offs to average loans for the three months ended at September 30, 2012 was 0.03%, non-annualized.

The following tables present the number and amount of non-accrual CRE and multi-family loans by originating bank at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

As of September 30, 2012

(dollars in thousands)

   Non-Performing
Multi-Family
Loans
   Non-Performing
Commercial

Real Estate  Loans
   Number    Amount    Number    Amount

New York Community Bank

       64          $138,345          39          $43,184  

New York Commercial Bank

       2          948          8          11,457  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total for the Company

       66          $139,293          47          $54,641  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

65


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)

   Non-Performing
Multi-Family
Loans
   Non-Performing
Commercial

Real Estate  Loans
   Number    Amount    Number    Amount

New York Community Bank

       85          $204,116          49          $58,437  

New York Commercial Bank

       2          948          6          9,595  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total for the Company

       87          $205,064          55          $68,032  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

The following table presents information about our five largest non-performing loans as of September 30, 2012:

 

      Loan No. 1    Loan No. 2    Loan No. 3    Loan No. 4    Loan No.  5

Type of Loan

   Multi-family    ADC    C&I    C&I    CRE

Origination Date

   6/29/05    9/12/07    11/30/05    12/17/04    09/11/08

Origination Balance

   $41,116,000    $4,292,189    $16,360,000    $8,176,198    $6,300,000

Full Commitment Balance

   $45,531,750    $27,155,875    $16,360,000    $8,176,198    $6,300,000

Balance at September 30, 2012

   $41,636,000    $11,733,949    $7,146,189    $7,100,783    $6,197,016

Associated Allowance

   None    None    None    None    None

Non-Accrual Date

   February 2009    July 2011    September 2012     September 2012     May 2010

Origination LTV Ratio

   76%    77%    N/A    39%    75%

Current LTV Ratio

   76%    71%    N/A    24%    69%

Last Appraisal

     November 2011        January 2012      N/A    March 2012    April 2012

The following is a description of the five loans identified in the preceding table.

No. 1 - The borrower is an owner of real estate throughout the nation, and is based in New Jersey. This loan is collateralized by a complex of four multi-family buildings containing 672 residential and four commercial units in Washington, D.C. No allocation for the allowance for losses on non-covered loans was necessary, as determined by using the fair value of collateral method in accordance with FAS 114 (ASC 310-10/40).

No. 2 - The borrower is an owner of real estate and is based in New York. This loan is collateralized by a property that was developed into a seven-story condominium building containing 33 residential units and 9,498 square feet of retail or professional space in Astoria, New York. Construction is 100% complete and the borrower has sold and released ten units, representing 30% of the subject property. No allocation for the allowance for losses on non-covered loans was necessary, as determined by using the fair value of collateral method in accordance with FAS 114 (ASC 310-10/40).

No. 3 - The borrower is an owner and operator of fuel terminals and fuel distribution and is based in New York. This loan is collateralized by accounts receivable, inventory, and intangible assets. No allocation for the allowance for losses on non-covered loans was necessary, as determined by using the fair value of collateral method in accordance with FAS 114 (ASC 310-10/40).

No. 4 - The borrower is an owner and operator of fuel terminals and fuel distribution and is based in New York. This loan is collateralized by a fuel storage facility containing several small industrial buildings in Brooklyn, New York. No allocation for the allowance for losses on non-covered loans was necessary, as determined by using the fair value of collateral method in accordance with FAS 114 (ASC 310-10/40).

No. 5 - The borrower is an owner of real estate and is based in New York. The loan is collateralized by an 11,000 square foot commercial building with excess development rights in Manhattan. No allocation for the allowance for losses on non-covered loans was necessary, as determined by using the fair value of collateral method in accordance with FAS 114 (ASC 310-10/40).

The borrowers on these loans may no longer draw down additional funds.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

In an effort to proactively manage delinquent loans, the Company has selectively extended to certain borrowers concessions such as rate reductions, extension of maturity dates, and forbearance agreements. As of September 30, 2012, loans on which concessions were made with respect to rate reductions and/or extension of maturity dates amounted to $252.9 million and loans on which forbearance agreements were reached amounted to $31.3 million.

The eligibility of a borrower for work-out concessions of any nature depends upon the facts and circumstances of each transaction, which may change from period to period, and involve judgment regarding the likelihood that the concession will result in the maximum recovery for the Company.

 

66


Table of Contents

In accordance with GAAP, we are required to account for such loan modifications or restructurings as TDRs. In general, a modification or restructuring of a loan constitutes a TDR if we grant a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. Loans modified as TDRs are placed on non-accrual status until we determine that future collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured, which generally requires that the borrower demonstrate performance according to the restructured terms for at least six consecutive months.

Loans modified as TDRs totaled $284.2 million and $287.1 million, respectively, at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Accruing loans represented $113.8 million and $63.8 million, respectively, of total TDRs at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and non-accrual loans represented $170.4 million and $223.3 million, respectively, of the total amounts.

The following table presents information regarding our TDRs as of September 30, 2012:

 

(in thousands)    Accruing      Non-Accrual      Total  

Multi-family

     $ 74,825         $117,683         $192,508   

Commercial real estate

     37,473         39,881         77,354   

Acquisition, development, and construction

     --         11,734         11,734   

Commercial and industrial

     1,523         --         1,523   

One-to-four family

     --         1,101         1,101   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     $113,821         $170,399         $284,220   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents information regarding our TDRs as of December 31, 2011:

 

(in thousands)    Accruing      Non-Accrual      Total  

Multi-family

     $60,454         $166,248         $226,702   

Commercial real estate

     3,389         39,054         42,443   

Acquisition, development, and construction

     --         15,886         15,886   

Commercial and industrial

     --         667         667   

One-to-four family

     --         1,411         1,411   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     $63,843         $223,266         $287,109   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The increase in accruing loans and the corresponding decline in non-accrual loans over the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was attributable to a single CRE loan in the amount of $35.2 million that was returned to accruing status in the second quarter of 2012.

On a limited basis, we may lend additional credit to a borrower after the loan has been placed on non-accrual status or modified as a TDR if, in management’s judgment, the value of the property after the additional loan funding is greater than the initial value of the property plus the additional loan funding amount. In addition, the terms of our restructured loans typically would not restrict us from cancelling outstanding commitments for other credit facilities in the event of non-payment of the restructured loan.

Except for the non-accrual loans and TDRs disclosed in this filing, we did not have any potential problem loans at September 30, 2012 that would have caused management to have serious doubts as to the ability of a borrower to comply with present loan repayment terms and that would have resulted in such disclosure if that were the case.

 

67


Table of Contents

Asset Quality Analysis (Excluding Covered Loans, Covered OREO, and Non-Covered Loans Held for Sale)

The following table presents information regarding our consolidated allowance for losses on non-covered loans, our non-performing non-covered assets, and our non-covered loans 30 to 89 days past due at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Covered loans are considered to be performing due to the application of the yield accretion method, as discussed elsewhere in this report. Therefore, covered loans are not reflected in the amounts or ratios provided in this table.

 

(dollars in thousands)    At or For the
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
   At or For the
Year Ended
December 31, 2011

Allowance for Losses on Non-Covered Loans:

         

Balance at beginning of period

       $137,290             $  158,942     

Provision for losses on non-covered loans

       40,000             79,000     

Charge-offs:

         

Multi-family

       (24,428)            (71,187)    

Commercial real estate

       (4,995)            (11,900)    

Acquisition, development, and construction

       (5,907)            (9,153)    

One-to-four family

       (212)            (1,208)    

Other loans

       (6,217)            (12,462)    
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total charge-offs

       (41,759)            (105,910)    

Recoveries

       3,484             5,258     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

       $139,015             $  137,290     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Non-Performing Non-Covered Assets:

         

Non-accrual non-covered mortgage loans:

         

Multi-family

       $139,293             $205,064     

Commercial real estate

       54,641             68,032     

Acquisition, development, and construction

       24,813             29,886     

One-to-four family

       9,487             11,907     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total non-accrual non-covered mortgage loans

       228,234             314,889     

Other non-accrual non-covered loans

       18,334             10,926     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total non-performing non-covered loans (1)

       246,568             325,815     

Other real estate owned (2)

       43,932             84,567     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total non-performing non-covered assets

       $290,500             $410,382     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Asset Quality Ratios:

         

Non-performing non-covered loans to total non-covered loans

       0.92%          1.28%  

Non-covered non-performing assets to total non-covered assets

       0.71             1.07     

Allowance for losses on non-covered loans to non-performing non-covered loans

       56.38             42.14     

Allowance for losses on non-covered loans to total non-covered loans

       0.52             0.54     

Net charge-offs to average loans

       0.12(3)           0.35     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Loans 30-89 Days Past Due:

         

Multi-family

       $33,644             $  46,702     

Commercial real estate

       4,631             53,798     

Acquisition, development, and construction

       --             6,520     

One-to-four family

       3,563             2,712     

Other loans

       7,064             1,925     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total loans 30-89 days past due(4)

       $48,902             $111,657     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

(1) The September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 amounts exclude loans 90 days or more past due of $317.1 million and $347.4 million, respectively, that are covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements.
(2) The September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 amounts exclude OREO totaling $50.4 million and $71.4 million, respectively, that is covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements.
(3) Presented on a non-annualized basis.
(4) The September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 amounts exclude loans 30 to 89 days past due of $91.9 million and $112.0 million, respectively, that are covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements.

 

68


Table of Contents

Covered Loans and Covered Other Real Estate Owned

The credit risk associated with the assets acquired in our AmTrust and Desert Hills transactions has been substantially mitigated by our loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Under the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will reimburse us for 80% of losses (and share in 80% of any recoveries) up to a specified threshold with respect to the loans and OREO acquired in the transactions. In each case, the FDIC will reimburse us for 95% of any losses (and share in 95% of any recoveries) with respect to the acquired assets beyond the initial amounts. The loss sharing (and reimbursement) agreements applicable to one-to-four family mortgage loans and HELOCs are effective for a ten-year period. Under the loss sharing agreements applicable to other loans and OREO, the FDIC will reimburse us for losses for a five-year period; the period for sharing in recoveries on other loans and OREO extends for a period of eight years.

We consider our covered loans to be performing due to the application of the yield accretion method under ASC 310-30, which allows us to aggregate credit-impaired loans acquired in the same fiscal quarter into one or more pools, provided that the loans have common risk characteristics. A pool is then accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Accordingly, loans that may have been classified as non-performing loans by AmTrust or Desert Hills were no longer classified as non-performing at the dates of acquisition because we believed at that time that we would fully collect the new carrying value of those loans. The new carrying value represents the contractual balance, reduced by the portion expected to be uncollectible (referred to as the “non-accretable difference”) and by an accretable yield (discount) that is recognized as interest income. It is important to note that management’s judgment is required in reclassifying loans subject to ASC 310-30 as performing loans, and is dependent on having a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of the cash flows to be collected, even if a loan is contractually past due.

In connection with the AmTrust and Desert Hills loss sharing agreements, we initially established FDIC loss share receivables of $740.0 million and $69.6 million, which were the acquisition date fair values of the respective loss sharing agreements (i.e., the expected reimbursements from the FDIC over the terms of the agreements). The loss share receivables may increase if the losses increase, and may decrease if the losses fall short of the expected amounts. Increases in estimated reimbursements will be recognized in income in the same period that they are identified and that the allowance for losses on the related covered loans is recognized.

In the third quarter of 2012, a $2.3 million benefit was recorded in “non-interest income” as a result of an increase in expected reimbursements from the FDIC under our loss sharing agreements. In the trailing quarter, we recorded a comparable benefit of $14.8 million.

Decreases in estimated reimbursements from the FDIC, if any, will be recognized in income prospectively over the lives of the related covered loans (or, if shorter, over the remaining term of the loss sharing agreement). Related additions to the accretable yield on the covered loans will be recognized in income prospectively over the lives of the loans. Gains and recoveries on covered assets will offset losses, or be paid to the FDIC at the applicable loss share percentage at the time of recovery.

The loss share receivables may also decrease due to amortization, which was $6,000 in the current nine-month period, or increase due to accretion, which was $20.3 million in the year-earlier nine months. Accretion of the FDIC loss share receivable relates to the difference between the discounted, versus the undiscounted, expected cash flows of covered loans subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreements. These cash flows were discounted to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss sharing reimbursements from the FDIC. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we received FDIC reimbursements of $117.2 million, as compared to $113.6 million in the year-earlier nine months.

 

69


Table of Contents

Asset Quality Analysis (Including Covered Loans and Covered OREO)

The following table presents information regarding our non-performing assets and loans past due at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, including covered loans and covered OREO (collectively, “covered assets”):

 

(dollars in thousands)    At or For the
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
   At or For the
Year Ended
December 31, 2011

Covered Loans 90 Days or More Past Due:

         

Multi-family

       $    1,050             $        161     

Commercial real estate

       5,042             8,599     

Acquisition, development, and construction

       2,227             5,082     

One-to-four family

       297,293             314,821     

Other

       11,525             18,779     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total covered loans 90 days or more past due

       317,137             347,442     

Covered other real estate owned

       50,404             71,400     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total covered non-performing assets

       $367,541             $418,842     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total Non-Performing Assets (including covered assets):

         

Non-performing loans:

         

Multi-family

       $140,343             $205,225     

Commercial real estate

       59,683             76,631     

Acquisition, development, and construction

       27,040             34,968     

One-to-four family

       306,780             326,728     

Other non-performing loans

       29,859             29,705     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total non-performing loans

       563,705             673,257     

Other real estate owned

       94,336             155,967     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total non-performing assets (including covered assets)

       $658,041             $829,224     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Asset Quality Ratios (including covered loans and the allowance for losses on covered loans):

         

Total non-performing loans to total loans

       1.87%          2.30%  

Total non-performing assets to total assets

       1.49             1.97     

Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans

       34.35             25.34     

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

       0.64             0.58     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Covered Loans 30-89 Days Past Due:

         

Multi-family

       $         --             $          --     

Commercial real estate

       138             1,054     

Acquisition, development, and construction

       127             272     

One-to-four family

       84,471             103,495     

Other loans

       7,184             7,168     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total covered loans 30-89 days past due

       $91,920             $111,989     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total Loans 30-89 Days Past Due (including covered loans):

         

Multi-family

       $  33,644             $  46,702     

Commercial real estate

       4,769             54,852     

Acquisition, development, and construction

       127             6,792     

One-to-four family

       88,034             106,207     

Other loans

       14,248             9,093     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total loans 30-89 days past due (including covered loans)

       $140,822             $223,646     
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

70


Table of Contents

Geographical Analysis of Total Non-Performing Loans (Covered and Non-Covered)

The following table presents a geographical analysis of our non-performing loans at September 30, 2012:

 

(in thousands)       

New York

     $176,650   

Florida

     100,526   

New Jersey

     50,806   

Washington, D.C.

     41,866   

California

     34,332   

Arizona

     26,909   

Ohio

     17,185   

Connecticut

     16,635   

Nevada

     15,065   

Massachusetts

     12,753   

All other states

     70,978   
  

 

 

 

Total non-performing loans

     $563,705   
  

 

 

 

Securities

Total securities rose $879.1 million and $603.7 million, respectively, to $5.1 billion during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. The September 30th balance equaled 11.7% of total assets, while the balances at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 represented 9.8% and 10.8%, respectively.

The increase in securities largely reflects the purchase of GSE obligations, which represented 92.5% of total securities at the end of September, as compared to 90.6% and 93.7%, respectively, at June 30th and December 31st.

Held-to-maturity securities represented $4.8 billion, or 92.6%, of total securities at the end of September, representing a $912.1 million increase from the June 30th balance and a $949.8 million increase from the balance at December 31st.

At September 30, 2012, the fair value of securities held to maturity represented 105.0% of their carrying value, as compared to 104.6% and 103.9%, respectively, at the earlier dates. Mortgage-related securities accounted for $3.4 billion, $3.2 billion, and $3.0 billion, respectively, of securities held to maturity at September 30, 2012, June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, and other securities represented $1.4 billion, $686.4 million, and $819.6 million, respectively, at the corresponding dates. The estimated weighted average life of the held-to-maturity securities portfolio was 4.6 years at the end of September, as compared to 4.8 years and 4.7 years, respectively, at June 30th and December 31st.

Available-for-sale securities represented the remaining $378.5 million, or 7.4%, of total securities at the end of September, down $33.0 million from the June 30th balance and $346.1 million from the balance at December 31st. Included in the respective balances were mortgage-related securities of $206.5 million, $185.5 million, and $192.0 million, and other securities of $172.0 million, $226.0 million, and $532.7 million. The estimated weighted average life of the available-for-sale securities portfolio was 7.6 years at the end of September, as compared to 5.3 years and 3.0 years at the earlier dates.

Sources of Funds

The Parent Company (i.e., the Company on an unconsolidated basis) has four primary funding sources for the payment of dividends, share repurchases, and other corporate uses: dividends paid to the Company by the Banks; capital raised through the issuance of stock; funding raised through the issuance of debt instruments; and repayments of, and income from, investment securities.

On a consolidated basis, our funding primarily stems from a combination of the following sources: the deposits we gather through our branch network or acquire in business combinations, as well as brokered deposits; borrowed funds, primarily in the form of wholesale borrowings; the cash flows generated through the repayment and sale of loans; and the cash flows generated through the repayment and sale of securities.

 

71


Table of Contents

In the first nine months of 2012, loan repayments and sales totaled $13.0 billion, up from $10.3 billion in the first nine months of last year. Repayments and sales accounted for $5.2 billion and $7.8 billion, respectively, of the current nine-month total and for $5.6 billion and $4.7 billion, respectively, of the year-earlier nine-month amount.

Cash flows from the repayment and sale of securities totaled $2.3 billion and $561.4 million, respectively, in the current nine-month period, while purchases of securities totaled $3.4 billion during this time. In the first nine months of 2011, the cash flows from the repayment and sale of securities totaled $2.0 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, and were partially offset by purchases of securities totaling $3.4 billion.

Deposits

Our ability to retain and attract retail deposits depends on numerous factors, including customer satisfaction, the rates of interest we pay, the types of products we offer, and the attractiveness of their terms. There are times we may choose not to compete for such deposits, depending on our access to deposits through acquisitions, the availability of lower-cost funding sources, the competitiveness of the market and its impact on pricing, and our need for such deposits to fund our loan demand.

While the vast majority of our retail deposits have been acquired through business combinations or gathered through our branch network, our overall mix of deposits has also included brokered deposits. Depending on the availability and pricing of such wholesale funding sources, we typically refrain from pricing our retail deposits at the higher end of the market in order to contain or reduce our funding costs.

At September 30, 2012, deposits totaled $24.5 billion, reflecting a $475.0 million decrease from the June 30th balance and a $2.2 billion increase from the balance at December 31st. The nine-month increase primarily reflects the Aurora Bank transaction, which added $2.2 billion of brokered certificates of deposit (“CDs”), $766.7 million of institutional and retail CDs, and $11.3 million of retail money market accounts at June 28, 2012. Consistent with our expectations at the time of the transaction, approximately $398.7 million of the assumed deposits matured in the current third quarter, contributing to the linked-quarter decline in the balance at September 30, 2012.

The majority of the assumed deposits that ran off in the third quarter were brokered and institutional CDs. At September 30, 2012, CDs totaled $9.1 billion, reflecting a three-month reduction of $761.7 million and a nine-month increase of $1.7 billion. Brokered CDs represented $944.5 million, or 10.4%, of total CDs at September 30, 2012, as compared to $1.4 billion, or 13.8%, of the total at the end of June. We had no brokered CDs at December 31st.

Core deposits (defined as NOW and money market accounts, savings accounts, and non-interest-bearing deposits) represented $15.4 billion, or 62.9%, of total deposits at the end of September, reflecting a $286.7 million increase from the June 30th balance and a $529.7 million increase from the balance at December 31st.

Included in core deposits at September 30, 2012 were $8.8 billion of NOW and money market accounts, reflecting three- and nine-month increases of $121.6 million and $57.0 million; savings accounts of $4.1 billion, reflecting three- and nine-month increases of $14.6 million and $168.2 million; and non-interest-bearing accounts of $2.5 billion, up $150.4 million and $304.6 million, respectively, from the balances at June 30th and December 31st.

Included in the September 30th balance of NOW and money market accounts were brokered money market accounts of $3.8 billion, reflecting a $67.6 million increase from the June 30th balance and a $37.7 million decrease from the balance recorded at December 31st. In addition, the September 30th and June 30th balances of non-interest-bearing accounts included brokered non-interest-bearing deposits of $74.8 million and $104.1 million, respectively.

Although we prefer to compete for deposits on the basis of service, convenience, and our extensive range of products, we have the ability to compete on the basis of pricing should the need arise. While this has not yet been the case, given our success in acquiring or assuming deposits in earnings-accretive transactions, we believe that the size and scope of our franchise would facilitate our efforts to mount a deposit campaign.

 

72


Table of Contents

Borrowed Funds

Borrowed funds consist primarily of wholesale borrowings (i.e., FHLB advances, repurchase agreements, and fed funds purchased) and, to a lesser extent, junior subordinated debentures and other borrowed funds (consisting of preferred stock of subsidiaries and senior notes). At September 30, 2012, borrowed funds totaled $13.6 billion, reflecting a $1.0 billion increase from the June 30th balance and a $359.0 million decrease from the balance at December 31st.

Wholesale Borrowings

The three-month increase in borrowed funds was attributable to a rise in wholesale borrowings, while the nine-month reduction was primarily attributable to a decline in the balance of such funds. At September 30, 2012, wholesale borrowings totaled $13.2 billion, reflecting a linked-quarter increase of $1.0 billion and a nine-month reduction of $269.2 million. Wholesale borrowings represented 29.9% of total assets at the end of September, as compared to 28.0% and 32.0%, respectively, at the earlier dates.

FHLB advances accounted for $8.9 billion of the September 30th total, reflecting a $1.1 billion increase from the June 30th balance and a $369.2 million reduction from the balance at December 31st. Included in the September 30th balance were $654.4 million of FHLB-Cincinnati advances that were acquired in the AmTrust acquisition. The remaining advances were from the FHLB-NY.

The Community Bank and the Commercial Bank are both members of, and have lines of credit with, the FHLB-NY. Pursuant to blanket collateral agreements with the Banks, our FHLB advances and overnight advances are secured by pledges of certain eligible collateral in the form of loans and securities.

The September 30th balance of wholesale borrowings also included repurchase agreements of $4.1 billion, consistent with the balances at both June 30th and December 31st. Repurchase agreements are contracts for the sale of securities owned or borrowed by the Banks with an agreement to repurchase those securities at agreed-upon prices and dates. Our repurchase agreements are primarily collateralized by GSE obligations, and may be entered into with the FHLB-NY or certain brokerage firms. The brokerage firms we utilize are subject to an ongoing internal financial review to ensure that we borrow funds only from those dealers whose financial strength will minimize the risk of loss due to default. In addition, a master repurchase agreement must be executed and on file for each of the brokerage firms we use.

Fed funds purchased accounted for $100.0 million of wholesale borrowings at the end of September, as compared to $185.0 million at the end of June. We had no fed funds purchased at December 31, 2011.

A significant portion of our wholesale borrowings at the end of September consisted of callable advances and callable repurchase agreements. As of September 30th, $11.4 billion of our wholesale borrowings were callable by or before December 31, 2012. Given the current interest rate environment, we do not expect these borrowings to be called.

Junior Subordinated Debentures

Junior subordinated debentures totaled $427.1 million at the end of September, comparable to the balances at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Other Borrowings

Other borrowings totaled $4.3 million at the end of September, consistent with the June 30th balance and $90.0 million lower than the balance at December 31st. In June 2012, $90.0 million of fixed rate senior notes that had been issued in 2008 under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program matured. Please see Note 6, “Borrowed Funds,” for a detailed discussion of our wholesale borrowings, junior subordinated debentures, and other borrowings.

 

73


Table of Contents

Asset and Liability Management and the Management of Interest Rate Risk

We manage our assets and liabilities to reduce our exposure to changes in market interest rates. The asset and liability management process has three primary objectives: to evaluate the interest rate risk inherent in certain balance sheet accounts; to determine the appropriate level of risk, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital and liquidity requirements, and performance objectives; and to manage that risk in a manner consistent with guidelines approved by the Boards of Directors of the Company, the Community Bank, and the Commercial Bank.

As a financial institution, we are focused on reducing our exposure to interest rate volatility, which represents our primary market risk. Changes in market interest rates represent the greatest challenge to our financial performance, as such changes can have a significant impact on the level of income and expense recorded on a large portion of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and on the market value of all interest-earning assets, other than those possessing a short term to maturity. To reduce our exposure to changing rates, the Boards of Directors and management monitor interest rate sensitivity on a regular or as needed basis so that adjustments to the asset and liability mix can be made when deemed appropriate.

The actual duration of held-for-investment mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities can be significantly impacted by changes in prepayment levels and market interest rates. The level of prepayments may be impacted by a variety of factors, including the economy in the region where the underlying mortgages were originated; seasonal factors; demographic variables; and the assumability of the underlying mortgages. However, the largest determinants of prepayments are market interest rates and the availability of refinancing opportunities.

In the third quarter of 2012, we continued to pursue the core components of our business model in order to reduce our interest rate risk: (1) We continued to emphasize the origination and retention of intermediate-term assets, primarily in the form of multi-family and CRE loans; (2) We continued to deploy the cash flows from loan and securities repayments and sales to fund our loan production, as well as our more limited investments in securities; and (3) We continued to capitalize on the historically low level of the target fed funds rate to reduce our retail funding costs.

In connection with the activities of our mortgage banking operation, we enter into contingent commitments to fund residential mortgage loans by a specified future date at a stated interest rate and corresponding price. Such commitments, which are generally known as interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”), are considered to be financial derivatives and, as such, are carried at fair value.

To mitigate the interest rate risk associated with our IRLCs, we enter into forward commitments to sell mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) by a specified future date and at a specified price. These forward sale agreements are also carried at fair value. Such forward commitments to sell generally obligate us to complete the transaction as agreed, and therefore pose a risk to us if we are not able to deliver the loans or MBS pursuant to the terms of the applicable forward-sale agreement. For example, if we are unable to meet our obligation, we may be required to pay a “make whole” fee to the counterparty.

When we retain the servicing on the loans we sell, we capitalize a mortgage servicing right (“MSR”) asset. MSRs are recorded at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded as a component of non-interest income. We estimate the fair value of the MSR asset based upon a number of factors, including the current and expected loan prepayment rates, economic conditions, and market forecasts, as well as relevant characteristics of the associated underlying loans. Generally, when market interest rates decline, loan prepayments increase as customers refinance their existing mortgages to more favorable interest rate terms. When a mortgage prepays, or when loans are expected to prepay earlier than originally expected, a portion of the anticipated cash flows associated with servicing these loans is terminated or reduced, which can result in a reduction in the fair value of the capitalized MSRs and a corresponding reduction in earnings.

To mitigate the prepayment risk inherent in MSRs, we could sell the servicing of the loans we originate, and thus minimize the potential for earnings volatility.

We also invest in exchange-traded derivative financial instruments that are expected to experience opposite and offsetting changes in fair value as related to the value of our MSRs.

 

74


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis

The matching of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which such assets and liabilities are “interest rate sensitive” and by monitoring a bank’s interest rate sensitivity “gap.” An asset or liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a specific time frame if it will mature or reprice within that period of time. The interest rate sensitivity gap is defined as the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within a specific time frame and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within that same period of time.

In a rising interest rate environment, an institution with a negative gap would generally be expected, absent the effects of other factors, to experience a greater increase in the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities than it would in the yield on its interest-earning assets, thus producing a decline in its net interest income. Conversely, in a declining rate environment, an institution with a negative gap would generally be expected to experience a lesser reduction in the yield on its interest-earning assets than it would in the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities, thus producing an increase in its net interest income.

In a rising interest rate environment, an institution with a positive gap would generally be expected to experience a greater increase in the yield on its interest-earning assets than it would in the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities, thus producing an increase in its net interest income. Conversely, in a declining rate environment, an institution with a positive gap would generally be expected to experience a lesser reduction in the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities than it would in the yield on its interest-earning assets, thus producing a decline in its net interest income.

At September 30, 2012, our one-year gap was a negative 2.87%, as compared to a negative 0.92% at December 31, 2011. The nine-month change in our one-year gap was primarily due to an increase in the balance of CDs maturing in less than one year and an increase in the balance of wholesale borrowings maturing in less than one year.

The table on the following page sets forth the amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities outstanding at September 30, 2012 which, based on certain assumptions stemming from our historical experience, are expected to reprice or mature in each of the future time periods shown. Except as stated below, the amounts of assets and liabilities shown as repricing or maturing during a particular time period were determined in accordance with the earlier of (1) the term to repricing, or (2) the contractual terms of the asset or liability. The table provides an approximation of the projected repricing of assets and liabilities at September 30, 2012 on the basis of contractual maturities, anticipated prepayments, and scheduled rate adjustments within a three-month period and subsequent selected time intervals. For residential mortgage-related securities, prepayment rates are forecasted at a weighted average constant prepayment rate (“CPR”) of 35; for multi-family and CRE loans, prepayment rates are forecasted at weighted average CPRs of 22 and 18, respectively. Borrowed funds were not assumed to prepay. Savings, NOW, and money market accounts were assumed to decay based on a comprehensive statistical analysis that incorporates our historical deposit experience. Based on the results of this analysis, savings accounts were assumed to decay at 32% for the first five years, 18% for years five through ten, and 51% for the years thereafter. NOW accounts were assumed to decay at 37% for the first five years, 26% for years five through ten, and 37% for the years thereafter. Including those accounts having specified repricing dates, money market accounts were assumed to decay at 93% for the first five years and 7% for years five through ten.

Prepayment and deposit decay rates can have a significant impact on our estimated gap. While we believe our assumptions to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that the assumed prepayment and decay rates noted above will approximate actual future loan and securities prepayments and deposit withdrawal activity.

To validate our prepayment assumptions for our multi-family and CRE loan portfolios, we perform a monthly analysis, during which we review our historical prepayment rates and compare them to our projected prepayment rates. We continually review the actual prepayment rates to ensure that our projections are as accurate as possible, since prepayments on these types of loans are not as closely correlated to changes in interest rates as prepayments on one-to-four family loans would be. In addition, we review the call provisions in our borrowings and investment portfolios and, on a monthly basis, compare the actual calls to our projected calls to ensure that our projections are reasonable.

 

75


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis

 

    At September 30, 2012  
(dollars in thousands)   Three
Months
or Less
    Four to
Twelve
Months
    More Than
One Year

to Three Years
    More Than
Three Years

to Five Years
    More Than
Five Years

to 10 Years
    More
Than
10 Years
    Total  

INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS:

             

Mortgage and other loans (1)

    $ 5,208,743           $5,362,471           $ 9,515,699           $ 6,914,554           $3,537,302           $    649,904           $31,188,673   

Mortgage-related securities (2)(3)

    189,932           441,228           725,340           421,732           1,654,138           131,931           3,564,301   

Other securities and money market investments (2)

    1,239,838           551,037           25,247           2,056           68,386           173,907           2,060,471   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest-earning assets

    6,638,513           6,354,736           10,266,286           7,338,342           5,259,826           955,742           36,813,445   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITES:

             

NOW and money market accounts

    4,016,469           536,274           895,805           1,618,191           1,000,083           747,329           8,814,151   

Savings accounts

    633,553           66,209           283,721           326,159           726,431           2,085,942           4,122,015   

Certificates of deposit

    2,344,988           3,572,696           2,498,374           630,832           27,566           16,566           9,091,022   

Borrowed funds

    2,300,735           785,816           276,166           6,673,753           3,351,710           213,205           13,601,385   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

    9,295,745           4,960,995           3,954,066           9,248,935           5,105,790           3,063,042           35,628,573   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest rate sensitivity gap per period (4)

    $(2,657,232)          $1,393,741           $ 6,312,220           $(1,910,593)          $   154,036           $(2,107,300)          $  1,184,872   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap

    $(2,657,232)          $(1,263,491)          $5,048,729           $3,138,136           $3,292,172           $1,184,872        
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap as a percentage of total assets

    (6.03)%        (2.87)%        11.45%        7.12%        7.47%        2.69%     

Cumulative net interest-earning assets as a percentage of net interest-bearing liabilities

    71.41%        91.14%        127.72%        111.43%        110.11%        103.33%     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

(1) For the purpose of the gap analysis, non-performing non-covered loans and the allowances for loan losses have been excluded.
(2) Mortgage-related and other securities, including FHLB stock, are shown at their respective carrying amounts.
(3) Expected amount based, in part, on historical experience.
(4) The interest rate sensitivity gap per period represents the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

 

76


Table of Contents

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the preceding Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of the market, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates both on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Furthermore, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate from those assumed in calculating the table. Also, the ability of some borrowers to repay their adjustable-rate loans may be adversely impacted by an increase in market interest rates.

Interest rate sensitivity is also monitored through the use of a model that generates estimates of the change in our net portfolio value (“NPV”) over a range of interest rate scenarios. NPV is defined as the net present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities, and off-balance-sheet contracts. The NPV ratio, under any interest rate scenario, is defined as the NPV in that scenario divided by the market value of assets in the same scenario. The model assumes estimated loan prepayment rates, reinvestment rates, and deposit decay rates similar to those utilized in formulating the preceding Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis.

Based on the information and assumptions in effect at September 30, 2012, the following table reflects the estimated percentage change in our NPV, assuming the changes in interest rates noted:

 

Change in Interest Rates

(in basis points)(1)

       Estimated Percentage Change in
Net Portfolio Value

+200

     (4.63)%

+100

     (0.89)   

 

(1) The impact of 100- and 200-basis point reductions in interest rates is not presented in view of the current level of the fed funds rate and other short-term interest rates.

The net changes in NPV presented in the preceding table are within the parameters approved by the Boards of Directors of the Company and the Banks.

As with the Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis, certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodology used in the preceding interest rate risk measurements. Modeling changes in NPV requires that certain assumptions be made which may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. In this regard, the NPV Analysis presented above assumes that the composition of our interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured, and also assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve, regardless of the duration to maturity or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Furthermore, the model does not take into account the benefit of any strategic actions we may take to further reduce our exposure to interest rate risk. Accordingly, while the NPV Analysis provides an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to, and do not, provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our net interest income, and may very well differ from actual results.

We also utilize an internal net interest income simulation to manage our sensitivity to interest rate risk. The simulation incorporates various market-based assumptions regarding the impact of changing interest rates on future levels of our financial assets and liabilities. The assumptions used in the net interest income simulation are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ significantly from those presented in the following table, due to the frequency, timing, and magnitude of changes in interest rates; changes in spreads between maturity and repricing categories; and prepayments, among other factors, coupled with any actions taken to counter the effects of any such changes.

 

77


Table of Contents

Based on the information and assumptions in effect at September 30, 2012, the following table reflects the estimated percentage change in net interest income for the next twelve months, assuming the changes in interest rates noted:

 

Change in Interest Rates

(in basis points) (1)(2)

       Estimated Percentage Change in
Future Net Interest Income

+200 over one year

     (0.18)%

+100 over one year

     0.49   

 

(1) In general, short- and long-term rates are assumed to increase in parallel fashion across all four quarters and then remain unchanged.
(2) The impact of 100- and 200-basis point reductions in interest rates is not presented in view of the current level of the fed funds rate and other short-term interest rates.

Future changes in our mix of assets and liabilities may result in greater changes to our gap, NPV, and/or net interest income simulation.

In the event that our interest rate sensitivity gap analysis or net interest income simulation were to indicate a variance in our NPV in excess of our internal policy limits, we would undertake the following procedures to ensure that appropriate remedial action would be taken:

 

   

Our Management Asset/Liability Committee (the “ALCO Committee”) would inform the Board of Directors of the variance, and present recommendations to the Board regarding proposed courses of action to restore conditions to within-policy tolerances.

   

In formulating appropriate strategies, the ALCO Committee would ascertain the primary causes of the variance from policy tolerances, the expected term of such conditions, and the projected effect on capital and earnings.

Where temporary changes in market conditions or volume levels result in significant increases in risk, strategies may involve reducing open positions or employing synthetic hedging techniques to more immediately reduce risk exposure. Where variance from policy tolerances is triggered by more fundamental imbalances in the risk profiles of core loan and deposit products, a remedial strategy may involve restoring balance through natural hedges to the extent possible before employing synthetic hedging techniques. Other strategies might include:

 

   

Asset restructuring, involving sales of assets having high risk profiles or a gradual restructuring of the asset mix over time to affect the maturity or repricing schedule of assets;

   

Liability restructuring, whereby product offerings and pricing are altered or wholesale borrowings are employed to affect the maturity structure or repricing of liabilities;

   

Expansion or shrinkage of the balance sheet to correct imbalances in the re-pricing or maturity periods between assets and liabilities; and/or

   

Use or alteration of off-balance sheet positions, including interest rate swaps, caps, floors, options, and forward purchase or sales commitments.

Based on our current interest rate risk position, our analyses indicate that increases in interest rates within the range of assumptions could result in a decrease in our NPV, while our net interest income analysis could result in a simultaneous increase, due to the following factors:

 

   

Different time measurement periods: The net interest income analysis is measured over a twelve-month time period, whereas the NPV analysis is measured over the life of each applicable instrument.

   

Different rate change sensitivities: In the net interest income analysis, the interest rate curve is projected to move in a parallel fashion over a twelve-month period, while the NPV analysis assumes an immediate rate shock.

   

Growth assumptions: The net interest income analysis assumes new loan, security, deposit, and borrowing growth assumptions, whereas the NPV analysis is a point-in-time analysis that does not incorporate any new growth assumptions.

In connection with our net interest income simulation modeling, we evaluate the impact of changes in the slope of the yield curve. For the period ending September 30, 2012, our analysis indicated that a yield curve that inverted over a twelve-month period would be expected to result in a 2.77% decrease in net interest income; conversely, a steepening of the yield curve over a twelve-month period would be expected to result in an increase in net interest income of 3.36%.

 

78


Table of Contents

Liquidity, Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance-Sheet Commitments, and Capital Position

Liquidity

We manage our liquidity to ensure that cash flows are sufficient to support our operations, and to compensate for any temporary mismatches between sources and uses of funds caused by variable loan and deposit demand.

We monitor our liquidity daily to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet our financial obligations. Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, which totaled $2.5 billion at September 30, 2012, as compared to $3.2 billion at the end of the trailing quarter and $2.0 billion at December 31, 2011. The linked-quarter reduction in cash and cash equivalents reflects the deployment of funds into loans held for investment and GSE securities in the last three months. Included in the balance of cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2012 were $350.0 million of pledged reverse repurchase agreements.

Loans and securities continued to be a significant source of liquidity in the current nine-month period, with proceeds from the repayment and sale of loans totaling $13.0 billion, and the repayment and sale of securities generating proceeds of $2.9 billion.

Additional liquidity stems from the deposits we acquire or gather through our branches and from our use of wholesale funding sources, including brokered deposits and wholesale borrowings. We also have access to the Banks’ approved lines of credit with various counterparties, including the FHLB-NY. The availability of these wholesale sources of funds is generally based on the amount of mortgage loan collateral available under a blanket lien we have pledged to the FHLB-NY and, to a lesser extent, the amount of available securities that may be pledged to collateralize our borrowings. As of September 30, 2012, our available borrowing capacity with the FHLB-NY was $5.8 billion. In addition, the Community Bank and the Commercial Bank had available-for-sale securities of $375.8 million, combined, at that date.

Our primary investing activity is loan production and, in the first nine months of 2012, the volume of loans originated exceeded the volume of loan repayments received. During this time, the net cash used in investing activities totaled $1.6 billion. Our financing activities provided net cash of $1.6 billion and our operating activities provided net cash of $537.8 million.

CDs due to mature in one year or less from September 30, 2012 totaled $5.9 billion, representing 65.1% of total CDs at that date. Our ability to retain these CDs and to attract new deposits depends on numerous factors, including customer satisfaction, the rates of interest we pay on our deposits, the types of products we offer, and the attractiveness of their terms. However, there are times that we may choose not to compete for deposits, depending on the availability of lower-cost funding, the competitiveness of the market and its impact on pricing, and our need for such deposits to fund loan demand.

On a stand-alone basis, the Parent Company is a separate legal entity from each of the Banks and must provide for its own liquidity. In addition to operating expenses and any share repurchases, the Company is responsible for paying any dividends declared to our shareholders. As a Delaware corporation, the Company is able to pay dividends either from surplus, or in case there is no surplus, from net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. In addition, the Company is not required to obtain prior Federal Reserve Bank approval to pay a dividend unless the declaration and payment of a dividend could raise supervisory concerns about the safe and sound operation of the Company and the Banks; the dividend declared for a period is not supported by earnings for that period; or the Company plans to declare a material increase in its dividend.

The Company’s ability to pay dividends may depend, in part, upon dividends it receives from the Banks. The ability of the Community Bank and the Commercial Bank to pay dividends and other capital distributions to the Parent Company is generally limited by New York State banking law and regulations, and by certain regulations of the FDIC. In addition, the Superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services (the “Superintendent”), the FDIC, and the Federal Reserve Bank, for reasons of safety and soundness, may prohibit the payment of dividends that are otherwise permissible by regulations.

 

79


Table of Contents

Under New York State Banking Law, a New York State-chartered stock-form savings bank or commercial bank may declare and pay dividends out of its net profits, unless there is an impairment of capital. However, the approval of the Superintendent is required if the total of all dividends declared in a calendar year would exceed the total of a bank’s net profits for that year, combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years. In the first nine months of 2012, the Banks paid dividends totaling $335.0 million to the Parent Company, leaving $321.8 million that they could dividend to the Parent Company without regulatory approval at September 30, 2012. In addition, sources of liquidity available to the Parent Company at that date included $144.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, together with $2.7 million of available-for-sale securities. If either of the Banks were to apply to the Superintendent for approval to make a dividend or capital distribution in excess of the dividend amounts permitted under the regulations, there can be no assurance that such application would be approved by the regulatory authorities.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance-Sheet Commitments

In the normal course of business, we enter into a variety of contractual obligations in order to manage our assets and liabilities, fund loan growth, operate our branch network, and address our capital needs.

At September 30, 2012, commitments to originate loans totaled $4.1 billion, including $1.8 billion of loans held for investment and $2.3 billion of loans held for sale. We also had off-balance-sheet commitments to issue stand-by letters of credit of $188.9 million, and contractual obligations to purchase $310.3 million of GSE securities.

In addition, we continue to be obligated under numerous non-cancelable operating lease and license agreements. The amounts involved in our operating lease and license agreements at the end of September were comparable to the amounts at December 31, 2011, as discussed in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Based upon the current strength of our liquidity position, we expect that our funding will be sufficient to fulfill these obligations and commitments when they are due.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We use various financial instruments, including derivatives, in connection with our strategies to reduce market risk resulting from changes in interest rates. Our derivative financial instruments consist of financial forward and futures contracts, IRLCs, and options. These derivatives relate to mortgage banking operations, MSRs, and other risk management activities, and seek to mitigate or reduce our exposure to losses from adverse changes in interest rates. These activities will vary in scope based on the level and volatility of interest rates, the types of assets held, and other changing market conditions. At September 30, 2012, we held derivative financial instruments with a notional value of $6.5 billion. (Please see Note 11, “Derivative Financial Instruments,” for a further discussion of our use of such financial instruments.)

Capital Position

In the first nine months of 2012, stockholders’ equity rose $76.8 million to $5.6 billion, and tangible stockholders’ equity rose $91.7 million to $3.2 billion. Tangible stockholders’ equity is calculated by subtracting the amount of goodwill and CDI recorded at the end of a period from the amount of stockholders’ equity recorded at the same date. Goodwill equaled $2.4 billion at both September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, while CDI equaled $36.7 million and $51.7 million, respectively, at the corresponding dates. (Please see the discussion and reconciliations of stockholders’ equity and tangible stockholders’ equity, total assets and tangible assets, and the related measures that appear earlier in this report.)

The increases in stockholders’ equity and tangible stockholders’ equity were tempered by the distribution of cash dividends totaling $328.9 million in the form of three quarterly dividends of $0.25 per share each.

At September 30th and December 31st, stockholders’ equity represented 12.80% and 13.24% of total assets and book values of $12.85 and $12.73 per share, respectively. Tangible stockholders’ equity represented 7.62% and 7.78% of tangible assets at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and book values per share of $7.22 and $7.04, respectively, at the corresponding dates.

 

80


Table of Contents

We calculate our book values per share by dividing the balance of stockholders’ equity and tangible stockholders’ equity at the end of the quarter by the number of shares outstanding at the same date. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had outstanding shares of 439,114,402 and 437,344,796, respectively.

Excluding AOCL from the calculations of tangible stockholders’ equity and tangible assets, the ratio of adjusted tangible stockholders’ equity to adjusted tangible assets was 7.74% at the end of September, as compared to 7.95% at December 31st. In the first nine months of 2012, AOCL fell $14.2 million to $57.7 million, as the net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax, rose $9.6 million; pension and post-retirement obligations, net of tax, fell $4.6 million; and the net unrealized loss on the non-credit portion of OTTI losses, net of tax, declined modestly.

Consistent with our focus on capital strength and preservation, our levels of regulatory capital at September 30, 2012, continued to exceed the minimum federal requirements for a bank holding company. Our subsidiary banks also reported solid levels of capital at the end of September, and continued to exceed the requirements for classification as “well capitalized” institutions under the FDIC Improvement Act. At September 30, 2012, New York Community Bank and New York Commercial Bank had respective Tier 1 leverage capital ratios of 8.29% and 13.61%; respective Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios of 12.69% and 16.85%; and respective total risk-based capital ratios of 13.41% and 17.45%. The minimum regulatory requirements for classification as a “well capitalized” institution are a leverage capital ratio of 5.00%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.00%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.00%.

The following regulatory capital analyses set forth the leverage, Tier 1 risk-based, and total risk-based capital levels at September 30, 2012 for the Company, the Community Bank, and the Commercial Bank, each in comparison with the minimum federal requirements:

Regulatory Capital Analysis (the Company)

 

     At September 30, 2012
          Risk-Based Capital
     Leverage Capital    Tier 1    Total
(dollars in thousands)    Amount    Ratio    Amount    Ratio    Amount    Ratio

Total capital

       $3,653,271          8.95%          $3,653,271          13.64%          $3,849,204          14.37%  

Regulatory capital requirement

       1,632,372          4.00             1,071,111          4.00             2,142,222          8.00     
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Excess

       $2,020,899          4.95%          $2,582,160          9.64%          $1,706,982          6.37%  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Regulatory Capital Analysis (New York Community Bank)

 

     At September 30, 2012
          Risk-Based Capital
     Leverage Capital    Tier 1    Total
(dollars in thousands)    Amount    Ratio    Amount    Ratio    Amount    Ratio

Total capital

       $3,177,722          8.29%          $3,177,722          12.69%          $3,361,269          13.42%  

Regulatory capital requirement

       1,533,543          4.00             1,001,963          4.00             2,003,925          8.00     
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Excess

       $1,644,179          4.29%          $2,175,759          8.69%          $1,357,344          5.42%  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Regulatory Capital Analysis (New York Commercial Bank)

 

     At September 30, 2012
          Risk-Based Capital
     Leverage Capital    Tier 1    Total
(dollars in thousands)    Amount    Ratio    Amount    Ratio    Amount    Ratio

Total capital

       $341,873          13.61%          $341,873          16.85%          $354,176          17.45%  

Regulatory capital requirement

       100,470          4.00             81,170          4.00             162,340          8.00     
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Excess

       $241,403          9.61%          $260,703          12.85%          $191,836          9.45%  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

81


Table of Contents

Basel III Proposal

In the summer of 2012, our primary federal regulators, published two notices of proposed rulemaking (the “2012 Capital Proposals”) that would substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and depository institutions, including the Company and the Banks, compared to the current U.S. risk-based capital rules, which are based on the international capital accords of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) which are generally referred to as “Basel I.”

One of the 2012 Capital Proposals (the “Basel III Proposal”) addresses the components of capital and other issues affecting the numerator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios, and would implement the Basel Committee’s December 2010 framework, known as “Basel III,” for strengthening international capital standards. The other proposal (the “Standardized Approach Proposal”) addresses risk weights and other issues affecting the denominator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios, and would replace the existing Basel I-derived risk weighting approach with a more risk-sensitive approach based, in part, on the standardized approach in the Basel Committee’s 2004 “Basel II” capital accords. Although the Basel III Proposal was proposed to come into effect on January 1, 2013, the federal banking agencies jointly announced on November 9, 2012 that they do not expect any of the proposed rules to become effective on that date. As proposed, the Standardized Approach Proposal would come into effect on January 1, 2015.

The federal banking agencies have not proposed rules implementing the final liquidity framework of Basel III, and have not determined to what extent they will apply to U.S. banks that are not large, internationally active banks.

It is management’s belief that, as of September 30, 2012, the Company, the Community Bank, and the Commercial Bank would meet all capital adequacy requirements under the Basel III and Standardized Approach Proposals on a fully phased-in basis if such requirements were currently effective. The regulations ultimately applicable to financial institutions may be substantially different from the Basel III final framework as published in December 2010 and the proposed rules issued in June 2012. Management will continue to monitor these and any future proposals submitted by our regulators.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

Earnings Summary

In the third quarter of 2012, we generated earnings of $128.8 million, as compared to $131.2 million and $119.8 million, respectively, in the trailing and year-earlier three months. The respective amounts were equivalent to $0.29, $0.30, and $0.27 per diluted share.

Linked-Quarter Comparison

The modest linked-quarter decline in earnings was attributable to a combination of factors. While net interest income and non-interest income declined $11.7 million and $16.5 million, respectively, from the trailing-quarter levels, the impact was largely tempered by a $5.0 million reduction in the provisions for losses on non-covered loans to $10.0 million, and a $15.6 million decline in the provision for losses on covered loans to $2.8 million. In addition, non-interest expense fell $2.1 million linked-quarter, to $153.3 million, reflecting reductions in operating expenses and the amortization of CDI.

Net interest income totaled $285.0 million in the current third quarter, while non-interest income totaled $81.7 million, representing 77.7% and 22.3%, respectively, of total revenues in the three months ended September 30, 2012. The linked-quarter decline in net interest income was primarily due to the decline in market interest rates, which prompted a surge in refinancing activity and, subsequently, the replenishment of the loan portfolio at lower yields. Prepayment penalty income contributed $31.5 million to net interest income in the current third quarter, comparable to the $32.0 million recorded in the second quarter of this year.

The decline in non-interest income was primarily due to a $12.5 million decrease in FDIC indemnification income to $2.3 million, which was largely offset by the aforementioned decline in the provision for losses on covered loans. In addition, mortgage banking income declined $5.7 million to $52.6 million, as income from originations of $66.5 million was tempered by a $13.9 million servicing loss.

Primarily reflecting a $5.5 million decline in pre-tax income to $200.5 million, income tax expense fell $3.1 million to $71.7 million in the third quarter of this year.

 

82


Table of Contents

Year-Over-Year Comparison

Earnings rose $9.0 million year-over-year as a $10.0 million decline in net interest income was exceeded by a $23.6 million increase in non-interest income, and the provision for losses on non-covered loans declined $8.0 million.

The rise in non-interest income was largely driven by mortgage banking income, which more than doubled as the steady decline in residential mortgage interest rates from the year-earlier level triggered an increase in refinancing activity and a steady volume of home purchase activity. In addition to a $35.6 million increase in income from originations, the rise in mortgage banking income was due to higher gain-on-sale margins.

The year-over-year decline in net interest income was attributable to the same combination of factors that led to the linked-quarter decline. However, the year-over-year reduction was tempered by a $19.4 million increase in prepayment penalty income, as the decline in market interest rates prompted an increase in the volume of multi-family and CRE loans that refinanced.

Non-interest expense rose $705,000 year-over-year as a $1.9 million increase in operating expenses was tempered by a reduction in the amortization of CDI. While occupancy and equipment and G&A expenses rose year-over-year, the impact was largely offset by a $2.5 million reduction in compensation and benefits expense.

Largely reflecting an $18.0 million increase in pre-tax income, income tax expense rose $9.0 million in the current third quarter from the level recorded in the third quarter of last year.

In the third quarter of 2011, our earnings included after-tax net securities gains of $4.0 million, which exceeded the impact of after-tax severance charges of $1.4 million.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is our primary source of income. Its level is largely a function of the average balance of our interest-earning assets, the average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities, and the spread between the yield on such assets and the cost of such liabilities. These factors are influenced by the pricing and mix of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities which, in turn, may be impacted by such external factors as economic conditions, competition for loans and deposits, market interest rates, and the monetary policy of the Federal Open Market Committee (the “FOMC”) of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

The cost of our deposits and borrowed funds is largely based on short-term rates of interest, the level of which is partially impacted by the actions of the FOMC. The FOMC reduces, maintains, or increases the target fed funds rate—the rate at which banks borrow funds overnight from one another—as it deems necessary. The target fed funds rate has been maintained at a range of zero to 0.25% since the fourth quarter of 2008.

While the fed funds rate generally impacts the cost of our short-term borrowings and deposits, the yields on our held-for-investment loans and other interest-earning assets are typically impacted by intermediate-term market interest rates. The five- and ten-year Constant Maturity Treasury (“CMT”) rates averaged 0.67% and 1.62%, respectively, in the current third quarter, as compared to 0.79% and 1.83%, respectively, in the trailing quarter, and to 1.15% and 2.41%, respectively, in the third quarter of last year.

Net interest income is also influenced by the level of prepayment penalty income recorded, primarily in connection with the prepayment of multi-family and CRE loans. Since prepayment penalty income is recorded as interest income, an increase or decrease in its level will also be reflected in the average yields on our loans and interest-earning assets, and therefore, in our interest rate spread and net interest margin.

In the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded net interest income of $285.0 million, reflecting a linked-quarter decrease of $11.7 million and a year-over-year decrease of $10.0 million. The linked-quarter and year-over-year reductions reflect the impact of the yield curve as the decline in intermediate-term interest rates exceeded the decline in short-term interest rates.

 

83


Table of Contents

Although loan production rose as the low level of market interest rates prompted a rise in refinancing activity, the replenishment of the loan portfolio occurred at lower yields. The impact was somewhat tempered by the high level of prepayment penalty income from multi-family and CRE loans held for investment, and by the meaningful increase in the average balance of loans. In addition, the Company continued to reduce its cost of interest-bearing deposits, largely reflecting the benefit of its transaction with Aurora Bank.

Linked-Quarter Comparison

The linked-quarter reduction in net interest income was the net effect of a $12.3 million decline in interest income to $442.7 million and a $563,000 decrease in interest expense to $157.8 million. While the average balance of interest-earning assets rose $205.5 million to $36.1 billion linked-quarter, the average yield on interest- earning assets fell 17 basis points to 4.90% in the current three-month period. Prepayment penalty income contributed $31.5 million to the interest income produced in the current third quarter, as compared to $32.0 million in the second quarter of this year. In addition, prepayment penalty income contributed 34 basis points to the average yield on interest-earning assets in the current third quarter, as compared to 35 basis points in the trailing three-month period.

Loans generated interest income of $394.9 million in the current third quarter, reflecting an $11.5 million decrease from the trailing-quarter amount. While the average yield on loans fell 17 basis points to 5.11%, the impact was somewhat tempered by a $135.8 million increase in the average balance of such assets to $30.9 billion during the same time. In addition, prepayment penalty income contributed 41 basis points to the average yield on loans in the current third quarter, consistent with the number contributed in the second quarter of this year.

The interest income generated by securities and money market investments declined $723,000 to $47.8 million, as the benefit of a $69.8 million increase in the average balance to $5.2 billion was exceeded by the impact of a ten-basis point decrease in the average yield on such assets, to 3.69%.

The modest decline in interest expense was the net effect of a $1.3 billion increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities to $34.8 billion and a ten-basis point decline in the average cost of funds to 1.80%. Interest-bearing deposits generated $35.9 million of the interest expense recorded during the quarter, reflecting a $501,000 decrease from the trailing-quarter level, as a $1.9 billion increase in the average balance to $22.4 billion was largely offset by a seven-basis point decline in the average cost to 0.64%. The increase in the average balance and the decline in the average cost of deposits were primarily attributable to the transaction with Aurora Bank. Reflecting that transaction, the average balance of CDs rose $1.8 billion on a linked-quarter basis, to $9.5 billion, while the average cost of such funds fell 25 basis points to 0.99%.

Borrowed funds, meanwhile, generated interest expense of $121.9 million, slightly below the level recorded in the second quarter of this year. While the average cost of borrowed funds rose 13 basis points to 3.92% linked-quarter, the impact was tempered by a $628.1 million decline in the average balance to $12.4 billion.

Year-Over-Year Comparison

The year-over-year reduction in net interest income was the net effect of a $19.2 million decline in interest income and a $9.2 million decline in interest expense.

While the decline in interest income was tempered by a $519.0 million rise in the average balance of interest-earning assets, the benefit of that increase was exceeded by the impact of a 29-basis point reduction in the average yield. The interest income produced by loans fell $5.2 million year-over-year, as the benefit of a $1.6 billion increase in the average balance was exceeded by the impact of a 35-basis point decline in the average yield. In addition, the interest income produced by securities and money market investments fell $14.0 million as the average balance of such assets declined $1.1 billion and the average yield fell 25 basis points.

The decline in interest expense was the net effect of a $1.6 billion increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities and a 20-basis point decline in the average cost of funds. Largely reflecting the impact of the Aurora Bank transaction, the interest expense produced by deposits fell $2.1 million from the year-earlier level as the impact of a $2.6 billion rise in the average balance was exceeded by the benefit of a 12-basis point reduction in the average cost of such funds. CDs accounted for most of the decrease in the interest expense generated by deposits, as the average cost of CDs fell 37 basis points from the year-earlier level, exceeding the impact of a $2.1 million increase in the average balance of such funds.

 

84


Table of Contents

In addition, the interest expense produced by borrowed funds fell $7.1 million from the level recorded in the third quarter of 2011 as the benefit of a $995.5 million decline in the average balance exceeded the impact of an eight-basis point rise in the average cost.

Net Interest Margin

The Company’s net interest margin was 3.17% in the current third quarter, reflecting a 13-basis point decrease from the trailing-quarter measure and a 16-basis point decrease from the margin recorded in the third quarter of last year. While prepayment penalty income contributed 35, 36, and 14 basis points, respectively, to the margin in the three months ended September 30, 2012, June 30, 2012, and September 30, 2011, the benefit was tempered by the yield curve as the spread between short-term and intermediate-term interest rates declined.

The amount of prepayment penalty income recorded in any given quarter is not only a function of repayment and refinancing levels but also the number of years remaining on each loan that repays or refinances during that time. The number of years dictates the number of prepayment penalty points that are charged on the remaining principal balance, based on a sliding scale of five points to one, as discussed under “Multi-Family Loans” and “Commercial Real Estate Loans” earlier in this report.

In addition, while prepayment penalty income may rise during periods of declining market interest rates, it should be noted that such income may also rise during periods when market interest rates rise or are expected to go up. Borrowers may opt to lock in a lower interest rate at times when rates are rising or are expected to do so, in order to avoid the risk of refinancing in the future when interest rates could be higher than they already are.

 

85


Table of Contents

The following tables set forth certain information regarding our average balance sheets for the periods indicated, including the average yields on our interest-earning assets and the average costs of our interest-bearing liabilities. Average yields are calculated by dividing the interest income produced by the average balance of interest-earning assets. Average costs are calculated by dividing the interest expense produced by the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities. The average balances for the period are derived from average balances that are calculated daily. The average yields and costs include fees that are considered adjustments to such average yields and costs.

Net Interest Income Analysis (Linked-Quarter Comparison)

(dollars in thousands)

 

     For the Three Months Ended  
     September 30, 2012      June 30, 2012  
                   Average                    Average  
     Average             Yield/      Average             Yield/  
     Balance      Interest      Cost      Balance      Interest      Cost  

Assets:

                 

  Interest-earning assets:

                 

 Mortgage and other loans, net (1)

     $30,916,239         $394,935         5.11%         $30,780,471         $406,481         5.28%   

 Securities and money market investments(2)(3)

     5,182,436         47,776         3.69            5,112,683         48,499         3.79      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Total interest-earning assets

     36,098,675         442,711         4.90            35,893,154         454,980         5.07      

  Non-interest-earning assets

     7,106,401               6,023,700         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Total assets

     $43,205,076               $41,916,854         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

                 

  Interest-bearing deposits:

                 

 NOW and money market accounts

     $  8,842,331         $    9,106         0.41%         $  8,805,432         $    9,357         0.43%   

 Savings accounts

     4,127,076         3,288         0.32            4,080,984         3,565         0.35      

 Certificates of deposit

     9,472,750         23,516         0.99            7,641,613         23,489         1.24      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Total interest-bearing deposits

     22,442,157         35,910         0.64            20,528,029         36,411         0.71      

  Borrowed funds

     12,354,988         121,851         3.92            12,983,063         121,913         3.79      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Total interest-bearing liabilities

     34,797,145         157,761         1.80            33,511,092         158,324         1.90      

  Non-interest-bearing deposits

     2,448,685               2,466,411         

  Other liabilities

     401,553               373,770         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Total liabilities

     37,647,383               36,351,273         

  Stockholders’ equity

     5,557,693               5,565,581         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

     $43,205,076               $41,916,854         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Net interest income/interest rate spread

        $284,950         3.10%            $296,656         3.17%   
     

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Net interest margin

           3.17%               3.30%   
        

 

 

          

 

 

 

  Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities

           1.04x                1.07x    
        

 

 

          

 

 

 

 

(1) Amounts are net of net deferred loan origination costs/(fees) and the allowance for loan losses, and include loans held for sale and non-performing loans.
(2) Amounts are at amortized cost.
(3) Includes FHLB stock.

 

86


Table of Contents

Net Interest Income Analysis (Year-Over-Year Comparison)

(dollars in thousands)

 

     For the Three Months Ended September 30,  
     2012      2011  
                   Average                    Average  
     Average             Yield/      Average             Yield/  
     Balance      Interest      Cost      Balance      Interest      Cost  

Assets:

                 

  Interest-earning assets:

                 

Mortgage and other loans, net (1)

     $30,916,239         $394,935         5.11%         $29,307,784         $400,114         5.46%   

Securities and money market investments(2)(3)

     5,182,436         47,776         3.69            6,271,884         61,777         3.94      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Total interest-earning assets

     36,098,675         442,711         4.90            35,579,668         461,891         5.19      

  Non-interest-earning assets

     7,106,401               5,682,316         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Total assets

     $43,205,076               $41,261,984         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

                 

  Interest-bearing deposits:

                 

NOW and money market accounts

     $  8,842,331         $    9,106         0.41%         $  8,568,443         $    9,095         0.42%   

Savings accounts

     4,127,076         3,288         0.32            3,923,401         3,696         0.37      

Certificates of deposit

     9,472,750         23,516         0.99            7,332,241         25,173         1.36      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Total interest-bearing deposits

     22,442,157         35,910         0.64            19,824,085         37,964         0.76      

  Borrowed funds

     12,354,988         121,851         3.92            13,350,451         128,960         3.84      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Total interest-bearing liabilities

     34,797,145         157,761         1.80            33,174,536         166,924         2.00      

  Non-interest-bearing deposits

     2,448,685               2,219,795         

  Other liabilities

     401,553               366,427         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Total liabilities

     37,647,383               35,760,758         

  Stockholders’ equity

     5,557,693               5,501,226         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

     $43,205,076               $41,261,984         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Net interest income/interest rate spread

        $284,950         3.10%            $294,967         3.19%   
     

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Net interest margin

           3.17%               3.33%   
        

 

 

          

 

 

 

  Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities

           1.04x               1.07x    
        

 

 

          

 

 

 

 

(1) Amounts are net of net deferred loan origination costs/(fees) and the allowance for loan losses, and include loans held for sale and non-performing loans.
(2) Amounts are at amortized cost.
(3) Includes FHLB stock.

Provisions for Loan Losses

Provision for Losses on Non-Covered Loans

The provision for losses on non-covered loans is based on management’s assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for losses on non-covered loans which, in turn, is based on its evaluation of inherent losses in the non-covered loan portfolio in accordance with GAAP. This evaluation considers several factors, including the current and historical performance of the non-covered loan portfolio; its inherent risk characteristics; the level of non-performing non-covered loans and charge-offs; delinquency levels and trends; local economic and market conditions; declines in real estate values; and the levels of unemployment and vacancy rates.

In the three months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded a provision for losses on non-covered loans of $10.0 million, as compared to $15.0 million and $18.0 million, respectively, in the trailing and year-earlier three months. Net charge-offs of non-covered loans totaled $8.9 million, $13.9 million, and $13.1 million, respectively, in the corresponding quarters and represented 0.03%, 0.05%, and 0.04% of average loans, non-annualized.

Provision for Losses on Covered Loans

In the current third quarter, we recorded a provision for losses on covered loans of $2.8 million, as compared to $18.4 million in the second quarter of this year. The provisions for losses on covered loans are primarily indicative of deterioration in the portfolios of HELOCs and one-to-four family loans that were acquired in the Company’s FDIC-assisted transactions, all of which are covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. The provisions for losses on covered loans recorded in the third and second quarters of 2012 were largely offset by FDIC indemnification income of $2.3 million and $14.8 million, recorded in non-interest income in the respective periods, as discussed below.

 

87


Table of Contents

Please see “Critical Accounting Policies” earlier in this report for a detailed discussion of the factors considered by management in determining the allowances for losses on both non-covered loans and covered loans, together with the discussion of asset quality that appears earlier in this report.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income totaled $81.7 million in the current third quarter, as compared to $98.2 million in the trailing quarter and $58.1 million in the year-earlier three months. The linked-quarter decline was primarily due to a reduction in FDIC indemnification income, as mentioned in the preceding discussion of the covered loan loss provision, from $14.8 million in the trailing quarter to $2.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Mortgage banking income remains the Company’s largest source of non-interest income, and consists of income from the origination and servicing of one-to-four family loans for sale. Income from originations totaled $66.5 million in the current third quarter, reflecting a linked-quarter increase of $13.6 million and a year-over-year increase of $35.6 million. These increases were attributable to the significant volume of one-to-four family loans produced for sale during the current third quarter, as the historically low level of interest rates continued to trigger a high level of refinancing activity and supported a steady level of home purchase transactions.

In the third quarters of 2012 and 2011, the level of mortgage banking income recorded was somewhat tempered by servicing losses of $13.9 million and $6.6 million, respectively. In contrast, the Company recorded servicing income of $5.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012. Mortgage banking income thus totaled $52.6 million in the current third quarter, as compared to $58.3 million and $24.3 million, respectively, in the trailing and year-earlier three months.

Three sources contribute to the servicing income or loss we record: loan servicing fee income; the mark-to-market on our MSRs, which may be positive or negative; and the gain or loss on our derivatives. In the three months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded $7.4 million of loan servicing fee income and a $20.7 million gain on derivatives, which tempered the impact of a $42.1 million negative mark-to-market on our MSRs.

In addition to mortgage banking income, the Company has three other ongoing sources of non-interest income: fee income, income from bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”), and other income, the latter consisting primarily of revenues from the sale of third-party investment products and revenues generated by a New York Community Bank subsidiary, Peter B. Cannell & Co., Inc. Revenues from these sources totaled $26.3 million in the current third quarter, as compared to $25.0 million and $27.1 million, respectively, in the trailing and year-earlier three months. Including mortgage banking income, non-interest income from ongoing sources totaled $78.9 million in the current third quarter, as compared to $83.3 million and $51.3 million, respectively, in the earlier periods.

In addition, the Company recorded net securities gains of $510,000 in the current third quarter, as compared to $141,000 and $6.7 million, respectively, in the trailing and year-earlier three months.

 

88


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the components of non-interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2012, June 30, 2012, and September 30, 2011:

Non-Interest Income Analysis

 

     For the Three Months Ended
(in thousands)    September 30,
2012
   June 30,
2012
   September 30,
2011

Mortgage banking income

       $52,581          $58,323          $24,274  

Fee income

       9,427          9,433          11,544  

BOLI income

       6,781          6,802          6,890  

Net gain on sales of securities

       510          141          6,734  

FDIC indemnification income

       2,256          14,759          --  

Other income:

              

Peter B. Cannell & Co., Inc.

       3,770          3,638          3,326  

Third-party investment product sales

       3,802          3,886          3,180  

Other

       2,530          1,223          2,121  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total other income

       10,102          8,747          8,627  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

       $81,657          $98,205          $58,069  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense consists of operating expenses (comprised of compensation and benefits, occupancy and equipment, and G&A expenses) and the amortization of CDI. In the three months ended September 30, 2012, non-interest expense totaled $153.3 million, reflecting a $2.1 million reduction from the trailing-quarter level and a $705,000 increase from the year-earlier amount. The level of non-interest expense recorded in the third quarter of 2011 included severance charges of $2.3 million that were included in compensation and benefits expense.

Operating expenses accounted for $148.5 million of non-interest expense in the current third quarter, reflecting a linked-quarter reduction of $2.0 million and a year-over-year increase of $1.9 million. The linked-quarter decline was largely due to a $2.6 million decrease in G&A expense to $51.1 million, primarily reflecting a reduction in the costs of managing and disposing of OREO. While the linked-quarter decline in operating expenses also reflects a modest drop in occupancy and equipment expense, the benefit was exceeded by an $825,000 increase in compensation and benefits expense to $74.4 million, primarily reflecting normal salary increases.

The year-over-year increase in operating expenses was due to G&A and occupancy and equipment expenses, which rose $3.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The impact of the increase in such costs was tempered by a $2.5 million decline in compensation and benefits expense from the year-earlier level, which included the aforementioned severance charges. The year-over-year rise in G&A expense reflects the impact of an increase in expenses stemming from the management and disposal of OREO, together with an increase in variable mortgage banking-related expenses as we increased our production of one-to-four family mortgage loans for sale.

While operating expenses declined on a linked-quarter basis, the benefit was offset by the linked-quarter reduction in total revenues. Accordingly, the efficiency ratio rose to 40.50% in the current third quarter from 38.12% in the trailing three-month period. Conversely, the efficiency ratio improved from 41.50% in the third quarter of 2011 as the impact of the increase in operating expenses was exceeded by the benefit of the year-over-year increase in total revenues.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense consists of federal, state, and local taxes and totaled $71.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012. The current third-quarter amount was $3.1 million less than the trailing-quarter level and $9.0 million higher than the year-earlier amount.

The linked-quarter decline in income tax expense was attributable to a $5.5 million reduction in pre-tax income, to $200.5 million, and to a decline in the effective tax rate to 35.8% from 36.3%.

 

89


Table of Contents

The year-over-year increase in income tax expense was attributable to an $18.0 million rise in pre-tax income and a rise in the effective tax rate from 34.4%. The year-over-year increase in the effective tax rate was largely due to a reduction in available business tax credits and to the rise in pre-tax income.

For additional information about our income tax expense, please see the discussion entitled “Income Taxes” under “Critical Accounting Policies” earlier in this report.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

Earnings Summary

Our earnings rose from $362.4 million, or $0.82 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2011 to $378.3 million, or $0.86 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2012. The year-over-year increase was largely driven by a $66.3 million rise in non-interest income to $241.9 million, which exceeded the impact of a $30.1 million decline in net interest income to $870.0 million.

Another factor contributing to the rise in our current nine-month earnings was a reduction in our provision for losses on non-covered loans. While the provision for losses on non-covered loans declined $19.0 million year-over-year, to $40.0 million, the benefit was largely tempered by a $12.6 million increase in the provision for losses on covered loans, to $21.3 million.

Earnings growth was also tempered by a $4.6 million increase in non-interest expense to $458.9 million, the net effect of a $10.2 million rise in operating expenses and a $5.7 million decline in CDI. In the first nine months of last year, our operating expenses were increased by third-quarter severance charges of $2.3 million.

Reflecting a $38.0 million rise in pre-tax income to $591.7 million and the impact of a 36.1% effective tax rate, income tax expense rose to $213.4 million in the current nine-month period from $191.3 million in the year-earlier nine months.

Included in our current nine-month earnings were after-tax net securities gains of $833,000. In contrast, our earnings for the first nine months of 2011 included after-tax net securities gains of $21.2 million, and an after-tax gain on business disposition of $5.9 million. The respective after-tax gains were equivalent to $0.05 and $0.01 per diluted share. The benefit of these after-tax gains was tempered by an after-tax OTTI loss of $10.8 million and after-tax severance charges of $1.4 million, which were respectively equivalent to $0.03 and $0.01 per diluted share.

Net Interest Income

In the first nine months of 2012, we generated net interest income of $870.0 million, down $30.1 million from the level recorded in the first nine months of last year. The reduction was the net effect of a $57.5 million decline in interest income to $1.3 billion and a $27.4 million decline in interest expense to $474.3 million. Prepayment penalty income contributed $81.1 million to interest income in the current nine-month period, an increase from $57.7 million in the year-earlier nine months.

The decline in interest income was attributable to the yield curve as the decline in market interest rates continued, and far exceeded the decline in short-term interest rates. Although the decline in market interest rates triggered an increase in refinancing activity and, therefore, prepayment penalty income, the balance sheet was replenished with assets that featured lower yields. As a result, the average yield on interest-earning assets fell 40 basis points year-over-year to 5.00% in the current nine-month period, even as the average balance of such assets rose $1.3 billion to $35.8 billion. Prepayment penalty income added 30 and 22 basis points, respectively, to the average yield on interest-earning assets in the current and year-earlier nine-month periods.

Notwithstanding the year-over-year rise in prepayment penalty income, the interest income produced by loans fell $32.7 million to $144.7 million in the first nine months of 2012. While the average balance of loans rose $1.9 billion year-over-year to $30.8 billion, the benefit was offset by a 47-basis point drop in the average yield, to 5.20%. The decrease in the average yield was tempered by the increase in prepayment penalty income, which contributed 35 basis points to the average yield on loans and 30 basis points to the average yield on interest-earning assets, as compared to 27 basis points and 22 basis points, respectively, in the year-earlier nine months.

 

90


Table of Contents

In addition, the interest income produced by securities and money market investments fell $32.7 million year-over-year, to $144.7 million, as the average balance of such assets declined by $696.3 million to $5.1 billion and the average yield on such assets fell 30 basis points to 3.80%.

Largely reflecting the Aurora Bank transaction, the decline in interest expense was the net effect of an $884.4 million increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities to $34.0 billion, and a 17-basis point reduction in the average cost of funds to 1.86%. Similarly, the interest expense generated by interest-bearing deposits fell $11.5 million year-over-year, to $108.3 million, as the average balance of interest-bearing deposits rose $1.1 billion to $21.1 billion, and the average cost of interest-bearing deposits fell 11 basis points, to 0.69%.

During this time, the interest expense produced by borrowed funds fell $15.8 million, as the average balance of such funds declined $222.9 million and the average cost of such funds declined ten basis points to 3.78%.

Reflecting the same factors that led to the decline in net interest income, our net interest margin was 3.23% in the current nine-month period, as compared to 3.47% in the year-earlier nine months. Prepayment penalty income contributed 30 basis points to the current nine-month margin, as compared to 23 basis points in the year-earlier nine months.

Net Interest Income Analysis

(dollars in thousands)

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
     2012      2011  
     Average
Balance
     Interest      Average
Yield/
Cost
     Average
Balance
     Interest      Average
Yield/
Cost
 

Assets:

                 

  Interest-earning assets:

                 

 Mortgage and other loans, net (1)

     $30,764,635         $1,199,600         5.20%         $28,816,967         $1,224,348         5.67%   

 Securities and money market investments(2)(3)

     5,076,957         144,729         3.80            5,773,211         177,474         4.10      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Total interest-earning assets

     35,841,592         1,344,329         5.00            34,590,178         1,401,822         5.40      

  Non-interest-earning assets

     6,452,286               6,354,770         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Total assets

     $42,293,878               $40,944,948         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

                 

  Interest-bearing deposits:

                 

 NOW and money market accounts

     $  8,816,279         $     27,196         0.41%         $  8,598,278         $     30,647         0.48%   

 Savings accounts

     4,063,996         10,349         0.34            3,952,332         12,029         0.41      

 Certificates of deposit

     8,183,101         70,725         1.15            7,405,528         77,099         1.39      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Total interest-bearing deposits

     21,063,376         108,270         0.69            19,956,138         119,775         0.80      

  Borrowed funds

     12,917,141         366,039         3.78            13,140,027         381,884         3.88      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Total interest-bearing liabilities

     33,980,517         474,309         1.86            33,096,165         501,659         2.03      

  Non-interest-bearing deposits

     2,413,444               2,008,140         

  Other liabilities

     357,777               350,279         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Total liabilities

     36,751,738               35,454,584         

  Stockholders’ equity

     5,542,140               5,490,364         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

     $42,293,878               $40,944,948         
  

 

 

          

 

 

       

  Net interest income/interest rate spread

        $   870,020         3.14%            $   900,163         3.37%   
     

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

  Net interest margin

           3.23%               3.47%   
        

 

 

          

 

 

 

  Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities

           1.05x               1.05x   
        

 

 

          

 

 

 

 

(1) Amounts are net of net deferred loan origination costs/(fees) and the allowance for loan losses, and include loans held for sale and non-performing loans.
(2) Amounts are at amortized cost.
(3) Includes FHLB stock.

 

91


Table of Contents

Provisions for Loan Losses

Provision for Losses on Non-Covered Loans

The provision for losses on non-covered loans declined $19.0 million year-over-year to $40.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. During this time, net charge-offs declined $40.3 million, or 51.3%, to $38.3 million, representing 0.12% of average loans, non-annualized.

Provision for Losses on Covered Loans

Reflecting deterioration in certain pools of loans acquired in our FDIC-assisted transactions, the provision for losses on covered loans rose to $21.3 million in the current nine-month period from $8.7 million in the year-earlier nine months. The respective amounts were largely offset by FDIC indemnification income of $17.0 million and $7.6 million, which was recorded in non-interest income in the respective nine-month periods.

For additional information about the provisions for loan losses recorded in the first nine months of 2012 and 2011, please see “Allowances for Loan Losses” within the discussion of Critical Accounting Policies and “Asset Quality” within the Balance Sheet Summary.

Non-Interest Income

In the first nine months of 2012, we recorded non-interest income of $241.9 million, reflecting a 37.8% increase from $175.6 million in the first nine months of 2011. The increase was largely driven by a $90.1 million, or 160.9%, rise in mortgage banking income to $146.1 million, as the record-low level of residential mortgage interest rates and the FOMC’s strategy of quantitative easing encouraged an increase in refinancings and a steady level of home purchase activity.

The increase in mortgage banking income was primarily due to a $103.5 million rise in income from originations to $159.5 million, reflecting both the increase in production and the higher margins we achieved on the sale of one-to-four family loans. The year-over-year increase in mortgage banking income was only partly offset by a servicing loss of $13.4 million, as compared to servicing income of $2,000 in the first nine months of last year. The servicing loss in the current nine-month period was the net effect of servicing fee income in the amount of $22.1 million, a $44.6 million gain on derivatives, and an $80.1 million negative mark-to-market on our MSRs.

Fee income, BOLI income, and other income together provided $77.4 million of non-interest income in the current nine-month period, as compared to $84.8 million in the year-earlier nine months. The $7.4 million decline was more than offset by the rise in mortgage banking income; as a result, non-interest income from our four ongoing sources rose $82.7 million year-over-year to $223.5 million in the first nine months of 2012.

In addition to the non-interest income produced through ongoing sources, our current nine-month total included a modest $1.4 million in net securities gains. In the year-earlier nine months, we recorded net securities gains of $35.5 million, in addition to a $9.8 million gain on the disposition of our insurance premium financing business. The benefit of the respective gains in the first nine months of 2011 was tempered by the impact of an OTTI loss on securities of $18.1 million that had been recorded in the second quarter of that year. No comparable losses were recorded in the first nine months of 2012.

 

92


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the sources and amounts of non-interest income in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

Non-Interest Income Analysis

 

     For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Mortgage banking income

     $146,069         $  55,986     

Fee income

     28,618         35,586     

BOLI

     23,168         21,343     

Net gain on sales of securities

     1,369         35,469     

FDIC indemnification income

     17,015         7,624     

Gain on business disposition

     --         9,823     

Loss on OTTI of securities

     --         (18,124)    

Other income:

     

Peter B. Cannell & Co., Inc.

     11,168         10,590     

Third-party investment product sales

     11,559         9,624     

Other

     2,892         7,646     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other income

     25,619         27,860     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

     $241,858         $175,567     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense rose $4.6 million year-over-year, to $458.9 million, as a $10.2 million increase in operating expenses to $444.0 million was tempered by a $5.7 million reduction in the amortization of CDI to $14.9 million.

Although compensation and benefits expense fell a modest amount (i.e., $560,000) to $221.6 million, the reduction was exceeded by a $2.7 million increase in occupancy and equipment expense to $68.1 million and by an $8.1 million increase in G&A expense to $154.3 million. The latter increase was largely due to higher variable mortgage banking expenses and the costs of managing and disposing of OREO.

Although the current year-to-date level of compensation and benefits expense reflects normal salary increases, and the allocation of certain stock-related incentives, the year-earlier level of compensation and benefits expense included severance charges of $2.3 million, as previously discussed.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense rose $22.1 million year-over-year to $213.4 million in the first nine months of 2012. The increase was due to a $38.0 million rise in pre-tax income to $591.7 million, and also reflects a rise in the effective tax rate to 36.1% from 34.5% in the year-earlier nine months. The year-over-year increase in the effective tax rate was due to the reduction in available business tax credits and to the rise in income before income taxes.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about the Company’s market risk were presented on pages 87-91 of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 29, 2012. Subsequent changes in the Company’s market risk profile and interest rate sensitivity are detailed in the discussion entitled “Asset and Liability Management and the Management of Interest Rate Risk” earlier in this quarterly report.

 

93


Table of Contents

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b), as adopted by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.

(b) Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of its business. All such actions, in the aggregate, involve amounts that are believed by management to be immaterial to the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There is one additional risk factor described below in addition to the factors disclosed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The Impact of Hurricane Sandy Could Adversely Affect Our Asset Quality and Interest Income on Loans.

During October 28, 2012 to October 31, 2012, Hurricane Sandy severely impacted areas in and around New York City, Long Island, and New Jersey, where the majority of the properties and businesses securing the Company’s mortgage and other loans are located. Accordingly, the ability of the Company’s borrowers to repay their loans may be compromised as a result of the damage caused by the storm.

While our exposure to loss should be limited by the existence of required insurance, it is possible that we will experience increased delinquencies and loan restructurings, which would reduce our net interest income, particularly in the short-term, as customers undertake recovery and clean-up efforts, including the submission of insurance claims. We may also need to increase our provisions for losses on non-covered loans as a result of loan restructurings and, to the extent that the combination of insurance proceeds and collateral values are insufficient to cover loan balances, loans that may default. Either of these circumstances could have a material impact on our results of operations for a period of time.

The risks described above and in the 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that the Company faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company, or that the Company currently deems to be immaterial, also may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, or results of operations.

 

94


Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Share Repurchase Program

During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company allocated $160,000 toward the repurchase of shares of its common stock, as outlined in the following table:

 

Period   

  (a)

  Total Number of
  Shares (or
  Units)
  Purchased
(1)

         

  (b)

  Average Price

  Paid per Share

  (or Unit)

         

  (c)

  Total Number of
  Shares (or Units)
  Purchased as Part  of

  Publicly Announced
  Plans or Programs

         

(d)

Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value)
of Shares (or Units) that May
Yet Be Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
(2)

Month #1:

July 1, 2012 through

July 31, 2012

     8,755                 $12.57                 8,755                       552,081

Month #2:

August 1, 2012 through

August 31, 2012

     1,171                 13.29                 1,171                       550,910

Month #3:

September 1, 2012 through    

September 30, 2012

     2,572                 13.31                 2,572                       548,338

Total

     12,498                 $12.79                 12,498                        

 

(1) All shares were purchased in privately negotiated transactions.
(2) On April 20, 2004, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to an additional five million shares. Of this amount, 548,338 shares were still available for repurchase at September 30, 2012. Under said authorization, shares may be repurchased on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

 

95


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit 3.1:   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (1)
Exhibit 3.2:   Certificates of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (2)
Exhibit 3.3:   Bylaws, as amended and restated (3)
Exhibit 4.1:   Specimen Stock Certificate (4)
Exhibit 4.2:   Registrant will furnish, upon request, copies of all instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt instruments of the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Exhibit 31.1:   Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Exhibit 31.2:   Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Exhibit 32:   Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
Exhibit 101:   The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

(1) Incorporated by reference to Exhibits filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2001 (File No. 000-22278).
(2) Incorporated by reference to Exhibits filed with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 001-31565).
(3) Incorporated by reference to Exhibits filed with the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2012 (File No. 001-31565).
(4) Incorporated by reference to Exhibits filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-66852).

 

96


Table of Contents

NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

       New York Community Bancorp, Inc.
       (Registrant)
DATE: November 9, 2012     BY:      /s/ Joseph R. Ficalora
      

Joseph R. Ficalora

President, Chief Executive Officer,

and Director

DATE: November 9, 2012     BY:      /s/ Thomas R. Cangemi
      

Thomas R. Cangemi

Senior Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

 

97