NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST INC - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d)
|
||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||
|
|||
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
|
|||
|
|||
OR
|
|||
|
|||
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d)
|
||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the
transition period from
to
Commission
file number 001-32216
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland
|
47-0934168
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
1301
Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019
(Address
of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)
(212)
792-0107
(Registrant's
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
definitions of “large accelerated filers” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one.):
Large
Accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated
Filer o
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer x
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No
x
The
number of shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $.01 per share,
outstanding on May 7, 2008 was 18,640,209
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC.
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part
I. Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
3
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
4
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
5
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
6
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
8
|
|
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results
of Operations
|
|
|
32
|
|
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Part
II. Other Information
|
|
|
63
|
|
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
63
|
|
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
|
|
63
|
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
|
|
63
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
64
|
|
2
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollar
amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
March
31,
2008
|
December 31,
2007
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
8,012
|
$
|
5,508
|
|||
Restricted
cash
|
1,369
|
7,515
|
|||||
Investment
securities - available for sale
|
512,550
|
350,484
|
|||||
Accounts
and accrued interest receivable
|
2,778
|
3,485
|
|||||
Mortgage
loans held in securitization trusts
|
398,323
|
430,715
|
|||||
Derivative
assets
|
104
|
416
|
|||||
Property
and equipment (net)
|
55
|
62
|
|||||
Prepaid
and other assets
|
1,828
|
2,200
|
|||||
Assets
related to discontinued operation
|
6,755
|
8,876
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
931,774
|
$
|
809,261
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Financing
arrangements, portfolio investments
|
$
|
431,648
|
$
|
315,714
|
|||
Collateralized
debt obligations
|
386,535
|
417,027
|
|||||
Derivative
liabilities
|
1,169
|
3,517
|
|||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
1,809
|
3,752
|
|||||
Subordinated
debentures
|
45,000
|
45,000
|
|||||
Convertible
preferred debentures
|
19,590
|
- | |||||
Liabilities
related to discontinued operation
|
4,912
|
5,833
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
890,663
|
790,843
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized, 18,640,209
shares
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2008 and 3,635,854 shares issued
and
outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
186
|
36
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
155,817
|
99,339
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(14,627
|
) |
(1,950
|
) | |||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(100,265
|
) |
(79,007
|
) | |||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
41,111
|
18,418
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
$
|
931,774
|
$
|
809,261
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
For
the Three Months
Ended
March 31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
REVENUES:
|
|||||||
Interest
income on investment securities and loans held in securitization
trusts
|
$
|
13,253
|
$
|
13,713
|
|||
Interest
expense on investment securities and loans held in securitization
trusts
|
10,514
|
13,084
|
|||||
Net
interest income on investment securities and loans held in
securitization trusts
|
2,739
|
629
|
|||||
Interest
expense - subordinated debentures
|
959
|
882
|
|||||
Interest
expense - convertible preferred debentures
|
506
|
— | |||||
Net
interest income (loss)
|
1,274
|
(253
|
)
|
||||
OTHER
EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|||||
Loan
losses
|
(1,433
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Loss
on securities and related hedges
|
(19,848
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Total
other expense
|
(21,281
|
)
|
—
|
||||
EXPENSES:
|
|||||||
Salaries
and benefits
|
313
|
345
|
|||||
Marketing
and promotion
|
39
|
23
|
|||||
Data
processing and communications
|
63
|
37
|
|||||
Professional
fees
|
352
|
100
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
75
|
68
|
|||||
Other
|
589
|
74
|
|||||
Total
expenses
|
1,431
|
647
|
|||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(21,438
|
)
|
(900
|
)
|
|||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operation - net of tax
|
180
|
(3,841
|
)
|
||||
NET
LOSS
|
$
|
(21,258
|
)
|
$
|
(4,741
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
$
|
(2.10
|
)
|
$
|
(1.31
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding-basic and diluted
|
10,140
|
3,616
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-In Capital
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
(dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January
1, 2008 -
Stockholders' Equity
|
|
$
|
36
|
$
|
99,339
|
$
|
(1,950
|
)
|
$
|
(79,007
|
)
|
$
|
18,418
|
||||||
Comprehensive
Income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(21,258
|
)
|
(21,258
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Increase
in net unrealized loss on available for sale
securities
|
(11,454
|
)
|
(11,454
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Increase in
net unrealized loss on derivative instruments
|
(1,223
|
)
|
(1,223
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Common
Stock Issuance
|
150
|
56,478
|
56,628
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2008 -
Stockholders' Equity
|
|
$
|
186
|
$
|
155,817
|
$
|
(14,627
|
)
|
$
|
(100,265
|
)
|
$
|
41,111
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
For
the Three Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
|||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | |||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(21,258
|
)
|
$
|
(4,741
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities:
|
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
332
|
490
|
|||||
Amortization
of premium on investment securities and mortgage loans held in
securitization trusts
|
224
|
564
|
|||||
Origination
of mortgage loans held for sale
|
—
|
(300,863
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sales or repayments of mortgage loans
|
1,782
|
345,205
|
|||||
Restricted
stock compensation expense
|
—
|
287
|
|||||
Loss
of securities and related hedges
|
19,848
|
—
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of retail lending segment
|
—
|
(5,585
|
)
|
||||
Loan
losses
|
1,195
|
2,971
|
|||||
Change
in value of derivatives
|
—
|
119
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Due
from loan purchasers
|
—
|
26,948
|
|||||
Escrow
deposits - pending loan closings
|
—
|
3,303
|
|||||
Accounts
and accrued interest receivable
|
724
|
199
|
|||||
Prepaid
and other assets
|
540
|
2,044
|
|||||
Due
to loan purchasers
|
500
|
(4,656
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(3,039
|
)
|
(74
|
)
|
|||
Other
liabilities
|
—
|
(103
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
848
|
|
65,989
|
||||
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|||||||
Restricted
cash
|
6,146
|
172
|
|||||
Purchases
of investment securities
|
(801,746
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of investment securities
|
587,704
|
—
|
|||||
Principal
repayments received on mortgage loans held in securitization
trusts
|
30,754
|
43,809
|
|||||
Principal
paydown on investment securities - available for sale
|
25,602
|
41,945
|
|||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
—
|
(369
|
)
|
||||
Disposal
of fixed assets
|
—
|
485
|
|||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(151,540
|
)
|
86,042
|
||||
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from common stock issued (net)
|
56,628
|
—
|
|||||
Proceeds
from convertible preferred debentures
(net)
|
19,590
|
—
|
|||||
Payments
made for termination of swaps
|
(8,333 | ) | — | ||||
Increase
(decrease) in financing arrangements
|
115,934
|
(454,756
|
)
|
||||
Collateralized
debt obligation borrowings
|
—
|
315,908
|
|||||
Collateralized
debt obligation paydowns
|
(30,623
|
)
|
(11,501
|
)
|
|||
Common
stock dividends paid
|
— |
(917
|
) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
153,196
|
(151,266
|
)
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (continued)
(unaudited)
For
the Three Months
Ended
March 31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Net
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
2,504
|
765
|
|||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Period
|
5,508
|
969
|
|||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents - End of Period
|
$
|
8,012
|
$
|
1,734
|
|||
|
|||||||
Supplemental
Disclosure
|
|||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
11,689
|
$
|
16,171
|
|||
Non
Cash Financing Activities
|
|||||||
Dividends
declared to be paid in subsequent period
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
909
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Organization
- New
York Mortgage Trust, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries (“NYMT”,
the “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us”) is a self-advised real estate investment
trust, or REIT, in the business of investing in residential adjustable rate
mortgage-backed securities issued by a United States government-sponsored
enterprise (“GSE” or “Agency”), such as the Federal National Mortgage
Association (“Fannie Mae”), or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(“Freddie Mac”), prime credit quality residential adjustable-rate mortgage
(“ARM”) loans, or prime ARM loans, and non-agency mortgage-backed securities. We
refer to residential adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities throughout
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as “MBS” and MBS issued by a GSE as
“Agency MBS”. We seek attractive long-term investment returns by investing our
equity capital and borrowed funds in such securities. Our principal business
objective is to generate net income for distribution to our stockholders
resulting from the spread between the interest and other income we earn on
our
interest-earning assets and the interest expense we pay on the borrowings that
we use to finance these assets, which we refer to as our net interest
income.
The
Company is organized and conducts its operations to qualify as a REIT for
federal income tax purposes. As such, the Company will generally not be subject
to federal income tax on that portion of its income that is distributed to
stockholders if it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its
stockholders by the due date of its federal income tax return and complies
with
various other requirements.
Until
March 31, 2007, the Company operated a mortgage lending business through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Hypotheca Capital, LLC (“HC”) (formerly known as The
New York Mortgage Company, LLC).
On
March
31, 2007, we completed the sale of substantially all of the operating assets
related to HC's retail mortgage lending platform to IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
(“Indymac”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Indymac Bancorp, Inc. On February 22,
2007, we completed the sale of substantially all of the operating assets related
to HC's wholesale mortgage lending platform to Tribeca Lending Corp.
(“Tribeca Lending”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Franklin Credit Management
Corporation.
In
connection with the sale of the assets of our wholesale mortgage origination
platform assets on February 22, 2007 and the sale of the assets of our retail
mortgage lending platform on March 31, 2007, we classified our mortgage lending
business as a discontinued operation in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144 Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
As a
result, we have reported revenues and expenses related to the mortgage lending
business as a discontinued operation and the related assets and liabilities
as
assets and liabilities related to the discontinued operation for all periods
presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements,
except for the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Certain assets
and liabilities, not assigned to Indymac or Tribeca Lending will become part
of
the ongoing operations of NYMT and accordingly, have not been classified as
a
discontinued operation in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144 (See
note 7).
While
the
Company sold substantially all of the assets of its wholesale and retail
mortgage lending platforms and exited the mortgage lending business as of March
31, 2007, it retains certain assets and liabilities associated with the
former line of business. Among the assets are mortgage loans held for sale
and
the related principal and interest receivable balances.
The liabilities include costs associated with the disposal of the
mortgage loans held for sale, potential repurchase and indemnification
obligations on previously sold mortgage loans and remaining lease payment
obligations on real and personal property not assigned as part of these
transactions.
Basis
of Presentation
- The
condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated
in consolidation. In
the
opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments, consisting of only normal
recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial
position, results of operations and cash flows have been included. The nature
of
the Company’s business is such that the results of any interim period
information are not necessarily indicative of results for a full
year.
8
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
As
used
herein, references to the “Company,” “NYMT,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to New
York Mortgage Trust, Inc., collectively with its subsidiaries.
The
Board
of Directors declared a one for five reverse stock split of our common stock,
as
of October 9, 2007, decreasing the number of common shares then outstanding
to approximately 3.6 million. Prior period share amounts and earnings per share
disclosures have been restated to reflect the reverse stock split.
Use
of Estimates
- The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. The Company’s estimates and assumptions primarily arise
from risks and uncertainties associated with interest rate volatility,
prepayment volatility and credit exposure on our loan losses, available for
sale
investments and derivative assets and liabilities. Although management is not
currently aware of any factors that would significantly change its estimates
and
assumptions in the near term, future changes in market conditions may occur
which could cause actual results to differ materially.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
- Cash
and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks and overnight
deposits. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in highly rated
financial institutions, and at times these balances exceed insurable
amounts.
Restricted
Cash
-
Restricted cash is held by counterparties as collateral for hedging instruments,
amounts held as collateral for two letters of credit related to the Company’s
lease of office space, including its corporate headquarters and amounts held
in
an escrow account to support warranties and indemnifications related to the
sale
of the retail mortgage lending platform to Indymac.
Investment
Securities Available for Sale
- The
Company's investment securities are residential mortgage-backed securities
comprised of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and “AAA”- rated adjustable-rate
securities, including adjustable-rate loans that have an initial fixed-rate
period. Investment securities are classified as available for sale securities
and are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in
other comprehensive income (“OCI”). The fair values for all securities in this
classification are based on unadjusted price quotes for similar securities
in
active markets. Realized gains and losses recorded on the sale of investment
securities available for sale are based on the specific identification method
and included in gain (loss) on sale of securities and related hedges. Purchase
premiums or discounts on investment securities are accreted or amortized to
interest income over the estimated life of the investment securities using
the
interest method. Investment securities may be subject to interest rate, credit
and/or prepayment risk.
When
the
fair value of an available for sale security is less than amortized cost,
management considers whether there is an other-than-temporary impairment in
the
value of the security (e.g., whether the security will be sold prior to the
recovery of fair value). Management considers at a minimum the following factors
that, both individually or in combination, could indicate the decline is
“other-than-temporary:” 1) the length of time and extent to which the fair value
has been less than book value; 2) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer; or 3) the intent and ability of the Company to
retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in market value. If, in management's judgment, an
other-than-temporary impairment exists, the cost basis of the security is
written down to the then-current fair value, and the unrealized loss is
transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income as an immediate
reduction of current earnings (i.e., as if the loss had been realized in the
period of impairment). Even though no credit concerns exist with respect to
an
available for sale security, an other-than-temporary impairment may be evident
if management determines that the Company does not have the intent and ability
to hold an investment until a forecasted recovery of the value of the
investment.
9
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
Accounts
and Accrued Interest Receivable
-
Accounts and accrued receivable includes interest receivable for investment
securities and mortgage loans held in securitization trusts.
Mortgage
Loans Held in Securitization Trusts
-
Mortgage loans held in securitization trusts are certain ARM loans
transferred to New York Mortgage Trust 2005-1, New York Mortgage Trust 2005-2
and New York Mortgage Trust 2005-3 that have been securitized into sequentially
rated classes of beneficial interests. Mortgage loans held in securitization
trusts are carried at their unpaid principal balances, including
unamortized premium or discount, unamortized loan origination costs and
allowance for loan losses. In
accordance with SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities-a replacement of FASB
statement No. 125, Securitized ARM loans and ARM loans collateralizing debt
are accounted for as loans and are not considered investments subject to
classification under SFAS 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
See
Collateralized Debt Obligations below for further description.
Interest
income is accrued and recognized as revenue when earned according to the terms
of the mortgage loans and when, in the opinion of management, it is collectible.
The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when, in management’s opinion,
the interest is not collectible in the normal course of business, but in no
case
when payment becomes greater than 90 days delinquent. Loans return to accrual
status when principal and interest become current and are anticipated to be
fully collectible.
Loan
Loss Reserves on Mortgage Loans Held in Securitization Trusts- We establish
a reserve for loan losses based on management's judgment and estimate of credit
losses inherent in our portfolio of mortgage loans held in securitization
trusts.
Estimation
involves the consideration of various credit-related factors including but
not
limited to, macro-economic conditions, the current housing market conditions,
loan-to-value ratios, delinquency status, historical credit loss severity rates,
purchased mortgage insurance, the borrower's credit and other factors deemed
to
warrant consideration. Additionally, we look at the balance of any delinquent
loan and compare that to the current value of the property. We utilize various
internet-based property data services to review comparable properties in the
same area or consult with a realtor in the property's area.
Comparing
the current loan balance to the property’s current value determines the current
loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio of the loan. Generally, we estimate that the a first
lien on a property that goes into a foreclosure process, resulting in real
estate owned (“REO”), results in the property being disposed of at approximately
68% of the property’s current value, after expenses. This estimate is based on
management's long term experience. It is possible we may realize less or
more
than that given today’s difficult real estate market conditions. Thus, for a
first lien loan that is 60 or more days delinquent, we will adjust the property
value down to approximately 68% of the property’s current value and compare that
to the current balance of the loan. The difference determines the base reserve
taken for that loan. This base reserve for a particular loan may be adjusted
if
we are aware of specific circumstances that may affect the outcome of the
loss
mitigation process for that loan. Predominately, however, we use the base
reserve number for our reserve.
The
loan
loss reserves will be maintained through ongoing provisions charged to operating
income and will be reduced by loans that are charged off. As of March 31, 2008
the allowance for loan losses held in securitization trusts totaled $3.1
million. The allowance for loan losses was $1.6 million at December 31, 2007.
Determining the allowance for loan losses is subjective in nature due to the
estimation required.
Property
and Equipment, (Net)
-
Property and equipment have lives ranging from three to ten years, and are
stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation
is
determined in amounts sufficient to charge the cost of depreciable assets to
operations over their estimated service lives using the straight-line method.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the life of the lease
or
service lives of the improvements using the straight-line method.
10
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
Financing
Arrangements, Portfolio Investments-
Portfolio investments are typically financed with repurchase agreements, a
form
of collateralized borrowing which is secured by portfolio securities on the
balance sheet. Such financings are recorded at their outstanding principal
balance with any accrued interest due recorded as an accrued expense (see
note 5).
Collateralized
Debt Obligations (“CDO”) -
We use
CDOs to permanently finance our loans held in securitization trusts. For
financial reporting purposes, the ARM loans and restricted cash held as
collateral are recorded as assets of the Company and the CDO is recorded as
the
Company’s debt. The transaction includes interest rate caps which are held by
the securitization trust and recorded as an asset or liability of the
Company.
The
Company, as transferor, securitizes mortgage loans and securities by
transferring the loans or securities to entities (“Transferees”) which generally
qualify under GAAP as “qualifying special purpose entities” (“QSPE's”) as
defined under SFAS No. 140, Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities-a replacement of SFAS No. 125 (“Off Balance Sheet
Securitizations”).
The
QSPEs issue investment grade and non-investment grade securities. Generally,
the
investment grade securities are sold to third party investors, and the Company
retains the non-investment grade securities. If a transaction meets the
requirements for sale recognition under GAAP, and the Transferee meets the
requirements to be a QSPE, the assets transferred to the QSPE are considered
sold, and gain or loss is recognized. The gain or loss is based on the price
of
the securities sold and the estimated fair value of any securities and servicing
rights retained over the cost basis of the assets transferred net of transaction
costs. If subsequently the Transferee fails to continue to qualify as a QSPE,
or
the Company obtains the right to purchase assets out of the Transferee, then
the
Company may have to include in its financial statements such assets, or
potentially, all the assets of such Transferee (see note 6).
Subordinated
Debentures -
Subordinated debentures are trust preferred securities that are fully guaranteed
by the Company with respect to distributions and amounts payable upon
liquidation, redemption or repayment. These securities are classified as
subordinated debentures in the liability section of the Company’s condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
Convertible
Preferred Debentures
-
As
of
March 31, 2008, there were 1.0 million shares of our Series A Preferred Stock
outstanding, with an aggregate redemption value of $20.0 million. On
January 18, 2008, the Company issued 1.0 million shares of its Series A
Cumulative Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, which we refer to as our
Series A Preferred Stock, to JMP Group Inc. and certain of its affiliates
for an
aggregate purchase price of $20.0 million. The Series A Preferred
Stock entitles the holders to receive a cumulative dividend of 10% per
year, subject to an increase to the extent any future quarterly common stock
dividends exceed $0.10 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock is
convertible into shares of the Company's common stock based on a conversion
price of $4.00 per share of common stock, which represents a conversion rate
of
five shares of common stock for each Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A
Preferred Stock matures on December 31, 2010, at which time
any outstanding shares must be redeemed by the Company at the $20.00
per share liquidation preference. Pursuant to SFAS 150, Accounting
for
Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equity, because of this mandatory redemption feature, the
Company classifies these securities as a liability on its
balance sheet.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
- The
Company has developed risk management programs and processes, which include
investments in derivative financial instruments designed to manage market risk
associated with its mortgage banking and its mortgage-backed securities
investment activities.
Derivative
instruments contain an element of risk in the event that the counterparties
may
be unable to meet the terms of such agreements. The Company minimizes its risk
exposure by limiting the counterparties with which it enters into contracts
to
banks, investment banks and certain private investors who meet established
credit and capital guidelines.
The
Company uses other derivative instruments, including treasury, Agency or
mortgage-backed securities forward sale contracts which are also classified
as
free-standing, undesignated derivatives and thus are recorded at fair value
with
the changes in fair value recognized in current earnings.
11
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
Interest
Rate Risk
- The
Company hedges the aggregate risk of interest rate fluctuations with respect
to
its borrowings, regardless of the form of such borrowings, which require
payments based on a variable interest rate index. The Company generally intends
to hedge only the risk related to changes in the benchmark interest rate either
the (London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or a Treasury
rate).
In
order
to reduce such risks, the Company enters into swap agreements whereby the
Company receives floating rate payments in exchange for fixed rate payments,
effectively converting the borrowing to a fixed rate. The Company also enters
into cap agreements whereby, in exchange for a fee, the Company is reimbursed
for interest paid in excess of a certain capped rate.
To
qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, interest rate swaps and caps must meet
certain criteria, including:
|
·
|
the
items to be hedged expose the Company to interest rate risk;
and
|
|
·
|
the
interest rate swaps or caps are expected to be and continue to be
highly
effective in reducing the Company's exposure to interest rate
risk.
|
The
fair
values of the Company's interest rate swap agreements and interest rate cap
agreements are based on values provided by dealers who are familiar with the
terms of these instruments. Correlation and effectiveness are periodically
assessed at least quarterly based upon a comparison of the relative changes
in
the fair values or cash flows of the interest rate swaps and caps and the items
being hedged.
For
derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge
(i.e. hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that
is
attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss
on
the derivative instruments are reported as a component of OCI and reclassified
into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction
affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instruments
in
excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of
the
hedged item, if any, is recognized in current earnings during the period of
change.
With
respect to interest rate swaps and caps that have not been designated as hedges,
any net payments under, or fluctuations in the fair value of, such swaps and
caps, will be recognized in current earnings.
Termination
of Hedging Relationships
- The
Company employs a number of risk management monitoring procedures to ensure
that
the designated hedging relationships are demonstrating, and are expected to
continue to demonstrate, a high level of effectiveness. Hedge accounting is
discontinued on a prospective basis if it is determined that the hedging
relationship is no longer highly effective or expected to be highly effective
in
offsetting changes in fair value of the hedged item.
Additionally,
the Company may elect to un-designate a hedge relationship during an interim
period and re-designate upon the rebalancing of a hedge profile and the
corresponding hedge relationship. When hedge accounting is discontinued, the
Company continues to carry the derivative instruments at fair value with changes
recorded in current earnings.
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
- Other
comprehensive income (loss) is comprised primarily of income (loss) from
changes in value of the Company’s available for sale securities, and the impact
of deferred gains or losses on changes in the fair value of derivative contracts
hedging future cash flows.
Employee
Benefits Plans
- The
Company sponsors a defined contribution plan (the “Plan”) for all eligible
domestic employees. The Plan qualifies as a deferred salary arrangement under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the Plan, participating
employees may defer up to 15% of their pre-tax earnings, subject to the annual
Internal Revenue Code contribution limit. The Company may match contributions
up
to a maximum of 25% of the first 5% of salary. Employees vest immediately in
their contribution and vest in the Company’s contribution at a rate of 25% after
two full years and then an incremental 25% per full year of service until fully
vested at 100% after five full years of service. The Company’s total
contributions to the Plan were $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2008
and
$18,495 for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
12
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
Stock
Based Compensation -
The
Company accounts for its stock options and restricted stock grants in accordance
with the SFAS No. 123 R, Share-Based
Payment
, (“SFAS
No. 123 R”) which requires all companies to measure compensation for all
share-based payments, including employee stock options, at fair value (see
note 13).
Income
Taxes
- The
Company operates so as to qualify as a REIT under the requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code. Requirements for qualification as a REIT include various
restrictions on ownership of the Company’s stock, requirements concerning
distribution of taxable income and certain restrictions on the nature of assets
and sources of income. A REIT must distribute at least 90% of its taxable income
to its stockholders of which 85% plus any undistributed amounts from the prior
year must be distributed within the taxable year in order to avoid the
imposition of an excise tax. The remaining balance may extend until timely
filing of the Company’s tax return in the subsequent taxable year. Qualifying
distributions of taxable income are deductible by a REIT in computing taxable
income.
HC
is a
taxable REIT subsidiary and therefore subject to corporate Federal income taxes.
Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
base upon the change in tax status. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date
(see note 11).
Earnings
Per Share
- Basic
earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income
available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of
common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects
the
potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue
common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the
Company.
Loan
Loss Reserves on Repurchase Requests and Mortgage Under Indemnification
Agreements-
We
establish reserves for loans we have been requested to repurchase from investors
and for loans subject to indemnification agreements. Generally loans wherein
the
borrowers do not make each of all the first three payments to the new investor
once the loan has been sold, require us, under the terms of purchase and sale
agreement entered into with the investor, to repurchase the
loan.
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008, we repurchased no mortgage loans and received
$0.3 million of new repurchase requests. As of March 31, 2008, we had pending
repurchase requests totaling approximately $4.7 million in unpaid principal
balances, against which the Company has taken a reserve of approximately $0.7
million. The reserve is based on historical settlement rates, property value
securing the loan in question and specific settlement discussion with third
parties. The Company intends to address the approximately $4.7 million in
outstanding repurchase requests by attempting to enter into settlement
agreements.
13
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
New
Accounting Pronouncements - On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements,
which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements.
In
June
2007, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 06-11, Accounting
for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment
Awards.
EITF
Issue No. 06-11 requires that the tax benefit related to dividend
equivalents paid on restricted stock units, which are expected to vest, be
recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. The Company
currently accounts for this tax benefit as a reduction to income tax expense.
EITF Issue No. 06-11 is to be applied prospectively for tax benefits on
dividends declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and
the Company expects to adopt the provisions of EITF Issue No. 06-11
beginning in the first quarter of 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption
of EITF Issue No. 06-11 to have a material effect on its financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The
changes to previous practice resulting from the application of SFAS 157 relate
to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value,
and the
expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The definition of
fair value retains the exchange price notion used in earlier definitions
of fair
value. SFAS 157 clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an
orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer
the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact
for the
asset or liability, that is, the principal or most advantageous market for
the
asset or liability. The transaction to sell the asset or transfer the
liability is a hypothetical transaction at the measurement date, considered
from
the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the
liability. SFAS 157 provides a consistent definition of fair value
which focuses on exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair
value,
the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. In
addition, SFAS 157 provides a framework for measuring fair value, and
establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon
the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the
measurement date (see note 10).
On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities,
which
provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and
liabilities at fair value.
The
objective of SFAS No. 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for
financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring
related
assets and liabilities differently. SFAS No. 159 establishes presentation
and
disclosure requirements and requires companies to provide additional information
that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more
easily
understand the effect of the company's choice to use fair value on its earnings.
SFAS No. 159 also requires entities to display the fair value of those assets
and liabilities for which the Company has chosen to use fair value on the
face
of the balance sheet. The Company’s adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material
impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements as the Company
did not
elect the fair value option for any of its existing financial assets or
liabilities as of January 1, 2008.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 140-3, Accounting
for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing
Transactions.
SFAS
No. 140-3 requires an initial transfer of a financial asset and a
repurchase financing that was entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation
of the initial transfer to be evaluated as a linked transaction under
SFAS No. 140 unless certain criteria are met, including that the
transferred asset must be readily obtainable in the marketplace. FSP
No. 140-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008, and will be applied to new transactions entered into after the date of
adoption. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact of adopting FSP No. 140-3 on its financial condition and cash
flows. Adoption of FSP No. 140-3 will have no effect on the Company’s
results of operations.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133.
SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s
derivative and hedging activities, and is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early
application encouraged. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 161 in the
first quarter of 2009. Because SFAS No. 161 requires only
additional disclosures concerning derivatives and hedging activities, adoption
of SFAS No. 161 will not affect the Company’s financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
2.
Investment Securities - Available for Sale
Investment
securities available for sale consist of the following as of March 31, 2008
and
December 31, 2007 (dollar amounts in thousands):
March
31,
2008
|
December 31,
2007
|
||||||
Amortized
cost
|
$
|
524,004
|
$
|
350,484
|
|||
Gross
unrealized losses
|
(11,454
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Fair
value
|
$
|
512,550
|
$
|
350,484
|
14
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
During
March 2008, news of security liquidations increased the volatility of
many
financial assets, including those held in our portfolio. Specifically,
the
significant liquidation of MBS by several large financial institutions
in early
March 2008 caused a significant decline in the fair market value of our
MBS
portfolio. Specifically, the fair market value of the Agency MBS in our
portfolio, including Agency ARM MBS and CMO Floaters that we pledge as
collateral for borrowings under our repurchase agreements, declined during
the
March 2008 market disruption. As a result of the significant decline
in the fair
value of our Agency securities, as determined by the lenders under our
repurchase agreements, the haircut required by our lenders to obtain
new or
additional financing on these securities experienced, in some cases, a
significant increase. For example, as of March 31, 2008, the average
haircut on
the CMO Floaters in our portfolio was 12% , as compared to 5% at December
31, 2007. As a result of the combination of lower fair values on our Agency
securities and rising haircut requirements to finance those securities,
we
elected to improve our liquidity position by selling approximately $592.8
million of Agency MBS securities, including $516.4 million of Agency ARM
MBS and $76.4 million of CMO Floaters from our portfolio in March 2008. The
sales resulted in a realized loss of $15.0 million.
As
result
of the timing of these sales occurring prior to the release of our December
31,
2007 results, the Company determined that the unrealized losses on our
entire
MBS securities portfolio were considered to be other than temporarily
impaired
as of December 31, 2007 and incurred an $8.5 million impaired
charge for the quarter ending December 31,
2007.
As
of
March 31, 2008 and the date of this filing, we have the intent, and believe
we
have the ability, to hold our portfolio of securities which are currently
in
unrealized loss positions until recovery of their amortized cost,
which may be until maturity. Given the uncertain state of the market
for such securities, should conditions change that would require us to
sell
securities at a loss, we may no longer be able to assert that we have the
ability to hold our remaining securities until recovery, and we would then
be
required to record impairment charges related to these securities. Substantially
all of the Company's investment securities available for sale are pledged
as
collateral for borrowings under financing arrangements (see note
5).
All
securities held in Investment Securities Available for Sale, including Agency,
investment and non-investment grade securities, are based on unadjusted price
quotes for similar securities in active markets and are categorized as level
2
per SFAS 157 (see note 10).
The
following tables set forth the stated reset periods and weighted average yields
of our investment securities at March 31, 2008: (dollar amounts in
thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 6 Months
|
More than 6
Months
to 24 Months
|
More than 24
Months
to 60 Months
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Agency
REMIC CMO floaters
|
$
|
224,262
|
4.12
|
%
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
$
|
224,262
|
4.12
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
Agency
Hybrid ARM securities
|
— | — | — |
—
|
261,778 |
4.22
|
%
|
261,778 |
4.22
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency
floaters
|
23,683
|
7.44
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
23,683
|
7.44
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
NYMT
Retained Securities
|
—
|
—
|
2,154
|
5.27
|
%
|
673
|
12.75
|
%
|
2,827
|
9.45
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted
average
|
$
|
247,945
|
4.50
|
%
|
$
|
2,154
|
5.27
|
%
|
$
|
262,451
|
4.31
|
%
|
$
|
512,550
|
4.41
|
%
|
The
NYMT
retained securities includes $0.7 million of residual interests related to
the
NYMT 2006-1 transaction.
The
following table sets forth the stated reset periods and weighted average yields
of our investment securities at December 31, 2007 (dollar amounts in
thousands):
Less than 6 Months
|
More than 6 Months
to 24 Months
|
More than 24 Months
to 60 Months
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average Yield
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Agency
REMIC CMO Floating Rate
|
$
|
318,689
|
5.55
|
%
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
$
|
318,689
|
5.55
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Non-Agency
Floaters
|
28,401
|
5.50
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
28,401
|
5.50
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
NYMT
Retained Securities
|
2,165
|
6.28
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
1,229
|
12.99
|
%
|
3,394
|
10.03
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted
Average
|
$
|
349,255
|
5.55
|
%
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
$
|
1,229
|
12.99
|
%
|
$
|
350,484
|
5.61
|
%
|
The
NYMT
retained securities includes $1.2 million of residual interests related to
the
NYMT 2006-1 transaction.
15
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
The
following table presents the Company's investment securities available for
sale
in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category and length
of
time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position at March 31, 2008. There were no unrealized positions as of December
31, 2007 as the Company incurred an $8.5 million impairment charge (dollar
amounts in thousands):
March
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Less
than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||||||||||||
Agency
REMIC CMO floaters
|
$
|
224,262
|
$
|
5,170
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
224,262
|
$
|
5,170
|
|||||||
Agency
Hybrid ARM securities
|
261,778
|
1,197
|
—
|
—
|
261,778
|
1,197
|
|||||||||||||
Non-Agency
floaters
|
23,683
|
4,520
|
—
|
—
|
23,683
|
4,520
|
|||||||||||||
NYMT
retained securities
|
2,827
|
567
|
—
|
—
|
2,827
|
567
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
512,550
|
$
|
11,454
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
512,550
|
$
|
11,454
|
3
.
Mortgage
Loans Held in Securitization Trusts
Mortgage
loans held in securitization trusts consist of the following as of March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollar amounts in thousands):
March 31,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
||||||
Mortgage
loans principal amount
|
$
|
398,875
|
$
|
429,629
|
|||
Deferred
origination costs - net
|
2,528
|
2,733
|
|||||
Reserve
for loan
losses
|
(3,080
|
)
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|||
Total
mortgage loans held in securitization
trusts
|
$
|
398,323
|
$
|
430,715
|
Reserve
for Loan losses -
The
following table presents the activity in the Company's reserve for loan losses
on mortgage loans held in securitization trusts for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 (dollar amounts in
thousands).
March
31,
|
|||||||
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at
beginning of period
|
$
|
1,647
|
$
|
—
|
|||
Provisions
for loan losses
|
1,433
|
—
|
|||||
Charge-offs
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Balance
of the end of period
|
$
|
3,080
|
$
|
—
|
The
increase in loan loss provisions were due to $0.8 million of new delinquent
loans and $0.6 million related to an increase in existing loan provisions.
The
reserves were adjusted higher for certain existing loans as a result of further
real estate valuation deterioration.
16
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
All
of
the Company's mortgage loans held in securitization trusts are pledged as
collateral for the CDO (see note 6). The Company’s net investment in the loans
held in securitization trusts, or the difference between the purchase cost
of
the loans and the amount of CDO outstanding, was $14.9 million, of which the
Company had a $3.1 million reserve or a net investment of $11.8
million.
The
following tables set forth delinquent loans in our portfolio as of March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollar amounts in thousands):
March 31, 2008 | ||||||||||
Days Late |
Number
of
Delinquent
Loans
|
Total
Dollar
Amount
|
%
of Loan
Portfolio
|
|||||||
30-60
|
2
|
$
|
1,052
|
0.26
|
%
|
|||||
61-90
|
1
|
|
397
|
0.10
|
%
|
|||||
90+
|
11
|
|
7,653
|
1.92
|
%
|
|||||
Real estate owned through foreclosure |
6
|
$ |
4,807
|
1.21
|
% |
December
31, 2007
|
|
Days Late |
Number
of
Delinquent
Loans
|
Total
Dollar
Amount
|
%
of Loan
Portfolio
|
|||||||
30-60
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
%
|
|||||
61-90
|
2
|
1,859
|
0.43
|
%
|
||||||
90+
|
12
|
6,910
|
1.61
|
%
|
||||||
Real
estate owned through foreclosure
|
4
|
$
|
4,145
|
0.96
|
%
|
17
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
4
.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
The
Company enters into derivatives to manage its interest rate and market risk
exposure associated with its MBS investment activities and its subordinated
debentures. These derivatives include interest rate swaps and caps to mitigate
the effects of major interest rate changes on net investment
spread.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, the
Company terminated a total of $517.7 million notional intrest rate swaps
resulting in a realized loss of $4.8 million.
The
following table summarizes the estimated fair value of derivative assets and
liabilities as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (see Note 10) (dollar
amounts in thousands):
March
31,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
||||||
Derivative Assets: | |||||||
Interest
rate caps
|
$
|
104
|
$
|
416
|
|||
Total
derivative assets
|
$
|
104
|
$
|
416
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
Derivative
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$
|
1,169
|
$
|
3,517
|
|||
Total
derivative liabilities
|
$
|
1,169
|
$
|
3,517
|
The
notional amounts of the Company's interest rate swaps and interest rate caps
as
of March 31, 2008 were $168.1 million and $717.7 million,
respectively.
The
notional amounts of the Company's interest rate swaps and interest rate caps
as
of December 31, 2007 were $220.0 million and $749.6 million,
respectively.
The
Company estimates that over the next 12 months, approximately $0.7 million
of the net unrealized losses on the interest rate swaps will be
reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings.
The
Company had pledged $1.6 million of Agency ARM MBS as margin for
interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2008 and had $4.7 million of restricted
cash
related to margin posted for interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2007. The
Company is required to post margin in the form of either cash or Agency ARM
MBS
to cover fair value deficits from our interest rate swap
counterparties.
18
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
5
.Financing
Arrangements, Portfolio Investments
The
Company has entered into repurchase agreements with third party financial
institutions to finance its mortgage-backed securities portfolio. The repurchase
agreements are short-term borrowings that bear interest rates based on a spread
to LIBOR, and are secured by the mortgage-backed securities which they finance.
At March 31, 2008, the Company had repurchase agreements with an outstanding
balance of $431.6 million and a weighted average interest rate of 3.00%. As
of
December 31, 2007, the Company had repurchase agreements with an outstanding
balance of $315.7 million and a weighted average interest rate of 5.02%. At
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, securities pledged as collateral for
repurchase agreements had estimated fair values of $481.7 million and $337.4
million, respectively. All outstanding borrowings under our repurchase
agreements mature within 30 days. As of March 31, 2008, the average
days to maturity for all repurchase agreements are 25 days. The Company had
outstanding repurchase agreements with six different financial institutions
as
of March 31, 2008 as compared to four as of December 31, 2007. In the event
we
are unable to obtain sufficient short-term financing through repurchase
agreements or otherwise, or our lenders start to require additional collateral,
we may have to liquidate our investment securities at a disadvantageous time,
which could result in losses. Any losses resulting from the disposition of
our investment securities in this manner could have a material adverse effect
on
our operating results and net profitability.
As
of
March 31, 2008, our Agency ARM MBS are financed with $230.2 million of
repurchase agreement funding equating to an advance rate of 94% that
implies a haircut of 6%, our Agency CMO floaters are financed with $180.7
million of repurchase agreement financing equating to an advance rate of 88%
that implies a haircut of 12% and the non-Agency CMO floater was financed with
$20.8 million of repurchase agreements funding equating to an advance rate
of
90% or a 10% haircut. As
discussed in Note 2 above, we experienced a combination of declining fair market
value for the securities in our portfolio and increasing haircut requirement
in
March 2008 that resulted in our selling approximately $592.8 million of Agency
MBS in our portfolio during March 2008. We undertook thse actions to reduce
our
leverage and improve our liquidity position. We
cannot
assure you that the haircuts on the securities in our MBS portfolio will not
increase from their current haircut average. A material increase in haircuts
on
these securities may result in securities sales similar to those in March 2008
that would likely negatively affect our profitability, liquidity and the results
of operations.
As
of
March 31, 2008, the Company had $8.0 million in cash and $29.9 million in
unencumbered securities including $24.6 million in Agency MBS to meet additional
haircut or market valuation requirements.
19
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
6.
Collateralized
Debt Obligations
The
Company’s CDOs are secured by ARM loans pledged as collateral. The ARM loans are
recorded as an asset of the Company and the CDOs are recorded as the Company’s
debt. The CDO transaction includes an amortizing interest rate cap contract
with
a notional amount of $271.0 million as of March 31, 2008 and a notional amount
of $286.9 million as of December 31, 2007, which is recorded as an asset of
the
Company. The interest rate caps are carried at fair value and totaled $0.1
million as of March 31, 2008 and $0.1 million as of December 31, 2007,
respectively. The interest rate cap reduces interest rate exposure on these
transactions. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had CDOs
outstanding of $386.5 million and $417.0 million, respectively. As of March
31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, the current weighted average interest rate on these
CDOs was 2.98% and 5.25%, respectively. The CDOs are collateralized by ARM
loans
with a principal balance of $398.9 million and $429.6 million at March 31,
2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively. The Company retained the owner trust
certificates, or residual interest for the three securitizations, and, as of
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, had net investment after loan loss
reserves of $11.8 million and $13.7 million, respectively.
7.
Discontinued Operation
In
connection with the sale of our wholesale mortgage origination platform assets
on February 22, 2007 and the sale of our retail mortgage lending platform on
March 31, 2007, during the fourth quarter of 2006, we classified our mortgage
lending segment as a discontinued operation in accordance with the provisions
of
SFAS No. 144. As a result, we have reported revenues and expenses related to
the
segment as a discontinued operation and the related assets and liabilities
as
assets and liabilities related to a discontinued operation for all periods
presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Certain assets, such as the deferred tax asset, and certain liabilities, such
as
subordinated debt and liabilities related to leased facilities not assigned
to
Indymac, will become part of our ongoing operations and accordingly, we have
not
included these items as part of the discontinued operation in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 144.
20
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
Balance
Sheet Data
The
components of Assets related to the discontinued operation as of March 31,
2008
and December 31, 2007 are as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
March
31,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
||||||
Accounts
and accrued interest receivable
|
$
|
34
|
$
|
51
|
|||
Mortgage
loans held for sale (net)
|
6,209
|
8,077
|
|||||
Prepaid
and other assets
|
501
|
737
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
11
|
11
|
|||||
Total assets
|
$
|
6,755
|
$
|
8,876
|
The
components of Liabilities related to the discontinued operation as of March
31,
2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows (dollar amounts in
thousands):
March
31,
2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||||
Due
to loan purchasers
|
$
|
1,070
|
$
|
894
|
|||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
3,842
|
4,939
|
|||||
Total liabilities
|
$
|
4,912
|
$
|
5,833
|
21
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
Statements
of Operations Data
The
statements of operations of the discontinued operation for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (dollar amounts in
thousands):
For
the Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
March
31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Revenues: | |||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
153
|
$
|
596
|
|||
Gain
on sale of mortgage loans
|
—
|
2,337
|
|||||
Loan
losses
|
(398
|
)
|
(3,161
|
)
|
|||
Brokered
loan fees
|
—
|
2,135
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of retail lending segment
|
—
|
5,160
|
|||||
Other
income
|
416
|
27
|
|||||
Total
net revenues
|
171
|
7,094
|
|||||
Expenses:
|
|
|
|||||
Salaries,
commissions and benefits
|
50
|
5,006
|
|||||
Brokered
loan expenses
|
—
|
1,723
|
|||||
Occupancy
and equipment
|
(136
|
)
|
1,312
|
||||
General
and administrative
|
77
|
2,894
|
|||||
Total
expenses
|
(9
|
)
|
10,935
|
||||
Income
(loss) before income tax (provision) benefit
|
180
|
(3,841
|
)
|
||||
Income
tax (provision) benefit
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations - net of tax
|
$
|
180
|
$
|
(3,841
|
)
|
Gain
on Sale of Mortgage Loans
- The
Company recognizes gain on sale of loans sold to third parties as the difference
between the sales price and the adjusted cost basis of the loans when title
transfers. The adjusted cost basis of the loans includes the original principal
amount adjusted for deferrals of origination and commitment fees received,
net
of direct loan origination costs paid.
22
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
Loan
Origination Fees and Direct Origination Costs
- The
Company records loan fees, discount points and certain incremental direct
origination costs as an adjustment of the cost of the loan and such amounts
are
included in gain on sales of loans when the loan is sold.
Brokered
Loan Fees and Expenses
- The
Company records commissions associated with brokered loans when such loans
are
closed with the borrower. Costs associated with brokered loans are expensed
when
incurred.
Loan
Commitment Fees
- Fees
received for the funding of mortgage loans to borrowers at pre-set conditions
are deferred and recognized at the date at which the loan is sold.
Other
Income (Expense) - Includes $0.4
million of penalty payments related to the corporate headquarters moving
delays
(see note 8 - Leases).
Income
tax (provision) benefit - During
the quarter ended September 30, 2007 management determined that the Company
would likely not be able to utilize the deferred tax asset and accordingly
recorded a 100% valuation allowance. The Company continued to reserve 100%
of
deferred tax benefit in the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as the facts continue
to support the Company's inability to utilize the deferred tax
asset.
8
.
Commitments
and Contingencies
Loans
Sold to Investors -
For
loans originated and sold by our discontinued mortgage lending business, the
Company is not exposed to long term credit risk. In the normal course of
business however, the Company is obligated to repurchase loans based on
violations of representations and warranties in the sale agreement, or early
payment defaults. The Company repurchased no loans for the three months
ended March 31, 2008.
As
of
March 31, 2008 we had a total of $4.7 million of unresolved repurchase requests,
against which the Company has a reserve of approximately $0.7 million. The
reserve is based on one or more of the following factors, including historical
settlement rates, property value securing the loan in question and specific
settlement discussion with third parties. The
Company has entered into a preliminary settlement agreement pertaining to
approximately $4.0 million of these outstanding loan repurchase requests. The
settlement is subject to final approval by the counterparty’s creditor
committee.
Outstanding
Litigation
- The
Company is at times subject to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary
course of business other than as described below, the Company does not believe
that any of its current legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate,
will have a material adverse effect on its operations, financial condition
or cash flows.
On
December 13, 2006, Steven B. Yang and Christopher Daubiere (“Plaintiffs”), filed
suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
against HC and us, alleging that we failed to pay them, and similarly situated
employees, overtime in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and
New York State law. The Plaintiffs, each of whom were former employees in
our discontinued mortgage lending business, purported to bring a FLSA
“collective action” on behalf of similarly situated loan officers in our now
discontinued mortgage lending business and sought unspecified amounts for
alleged unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, attorney’s fee and
costs.
On
December 30, 2007 we entered into an agreement in principle with the Plaintiffs
to settle this suit. The terms of the settlement remain subject to court
approval. We anticipate closing of the settlement during the 2008
second quarter. The Company has reserved $1.4 million for the proposed
settlement. As of March 31, 2008, there have been no material developments
or changes in the settlement terms.
Leases
- The
Company leases its corporate offices and certain office space related to our
discontinued mortgage lending operation not assumed by IndyMac and equipment
under short-term lease agreements expiring at various dates through 2010. All
such leases are accounted for as operating leases. Total rental (income) expense
for property and equipment amounted to $(0.1) million and $1.1 million for
the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As
of
March 31, 2008, the Company had been reimbursed for $0.4 million by Indymac
representing the reduction in escrow from the non performance of vacating the
premise as described below.
Pursuant
to an Assignment and Assumption of Sublease and an Escrow Agreement, each with
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman”) (collectively, the “Agreements”), the
Company assigned and Lehman has assumed the sublease for the Company's corporate
headquarters at 1301 Avenue of the Americas. Pursuant to the Agreements,
Lehman funded an escrow account, containing $3.2 million for the
benefit of HC. The escrow amount is reduced by $0.2 million for each month
the
Company remains in the leased space beginning February 1, 2008. As of March
31,
2008, the escrow has been reduced by $0.4 million due to penalties. The entire
remaining amount held in the escrow account will be released to the Company
when
it vacates the leased space. Pursuant to the provisions of the sale transaction
with IndyMac, IndyMac pays rent equal to the Company’s cost, including any
penalties and foregone bonuses resulting from the delayed vacation of the leased
premises for as long as IndyMac continues to occupy and use the leased space
at
the Company's corporate headquarters. The Company anticipates that IndyMac
will
vacate the space by July 2008.
23
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
Letters
of Credit
- HC
maintains a letter of credit in the amount of $100,000 in lieu of a cash
security deposit for an office lease dated June 1998 for the Company's former
headquarters located at 304 Park Avenue South in New York City. The sole
beneficiary of this letter of credit is the owner of the building, 304 Park
Avenue South LLC. This letter of credit is secured by cash deposited in a bank
account maintained at JP Morgan Chase bank.
HC
maintains a letter of credit in the amount of $313,000 in lieu of a cash
security deposit for its current corporate headquarters located at 1301 Avenue
of the Amercias in New York City for its sub landlord, PricewaterhouseCoopers,
LLP, as beneficiary. This letter of credit is secured by cash deposited in
a
bank account maintained at JP Morgan Chase bank.
Registration
Rights Agreement - On February 21, 2008, the Company completed the issuance
and sale of 15.0 million shares of its common stock in
a
private placement at a price of $4.00 per share. In connection with this
private
offering of our common stock, we entered into a registration rights agreement,
which we refer to as the Common Stock Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant
to
which we were required, among other things, to file
with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, a resale shelf registration
statement registering for resale the 15.0 million shares sold in this
private offering on or before March 12, 2008 and obtain listing for our common
stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market on or before the effective date
of
the resale shelf registration statement. In the event we fail to satisfy
these requirements, we may be subject to payment of liquidated damages to
the investors in the transaction. The Company filed
the
resale shelf registration statement on April 4, 2008 and it became effective
on
April 18, 2008. As a result, we incurred a penalty fee (liquidated damages)
of approximately $0.2 million which was paid on May 2, 2008 and remain subject
to the penalty until we obtain NASDAQ Stock Market listing
for our common stock.
9.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
At
March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were geographic concentrations of credit
risk exceeding 5% of the total loan balances within mortgage loans held in
the
securitization trusts and retained interests in our REMIC securitization, NYMT
2006-1, as follows:
March
31,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
||||||
New
York
|
30.5
|
%
|
31.2
|
%
|
|||
Massachusetts
|
17.7
|
%
|
17.4
|
%
|
|||
Florida
|
8.2
|
%
|
8.3
|
%
|
|||
California
|
7.0
|
%
|
7.2
|
%
|
|||
New
Jersey
|
5.9
|
%
|
5.7
|
%
|
10
.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company adopted SFAS 157 effective January 1, 2008, and accordingly all assets
and liabilities measured at fair value will utilize valuation methodologies
in
accordance with the statement. The Company has established and
documented processes for determining fair values. Fair value is based
upon quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or
quotes are not available, then fair value is based upon internally developed
models that primarily use inputs that are market-based or independently-sourced
market parameters, including interest rate yield curves.
A
financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based
upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. The three levels of valuation hierarchy established by
FAS 157 are defined as follows:
Level
1
- inputs
to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets
or liabilities in active markets.
Level
2
- inputs
to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset
or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of
the
financial instrument.
Level
3
- inputs
to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value
measurement.
The
following describes the valuation methodologies used for the Company’s financial
instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of
such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
a.
Investment Securities Available for Sale
- Fair
value is generally based on market prices provided by five to seven dealers
who
make markets in these financial instruments. The dealers will incorporate common
market pricing methods, including a spread measurement to the Treasury curve
or
Interest Rate Swap Cure as well as underlying characteristics of the particular
security including coupon, periodic and life caps, collateral type, rate reset
period and seasoning or age of the security. If the fair value of a security
is
not reasonably available from a dealer, management estimates the fair value
based on characteristics of the security that the Company receives from the
issuer and based on available market information. Management reviews all prices
used in determining valuation to ensure they represent current market
conditions. This review includes surveying similar market transactions,
comparisons to interest pricing models as well as offerings of like securities
by dealers. The Company’s investment securities are valued based upon readily
observable market parameters and are classified as Level 2 fair
values.
24
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
b. Interest Rate Swaps and Caps - The fair value of interest rate swaps and caps are based on using market accepted financial models as well as dealer quotes. The model utilizes readily observable market parameters, including treasury rates, interest rate swap spreads and swaption volatility curves. The Company’s interest rate caps and swaps are classified as Level 2 fair values.
The
following table presents the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair
value, at the dates indicated below as of March 31, 2008, on the condensed
consolidated balance sheet by SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy, as previously
described.
|
Fair
Value at March 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Investment
securities - available for sale
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
512,550
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
512,550
|
|||||
Mortgage loans held for sale (net) | — |
—
|
6,209 | 6,209 | |||||||||
Interest
Rate Caps
|
—
|
104
|
—
|
104
|
|||||||||
Total
assets carried at fair value
|
$ |
—
|
$
|
512,654
|
$
|
6,209
|
$
|
518,863
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
Rate Swaps
|
$ |
—
|
$ |
1,169
|
$ |
—
|
$ |
1,169
|
|||||
Total
liabilities carried at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,169
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,169
|
The
fair
value of our mortgage loans held for sale (net) decreased by $0.4 million during
the period that commenced on January 1, 2008 and ended on March 31, 2008. This
decrease in fair value of our mortgage loans held for sale (net) is included
in
loan loss in our discontinued operations.
Any
changes to the valuation methodology are reviewed by management to ensure the
changes are appropriate. As markets and products develop and the
pricing for certain products becomes more transparent, the Company continues
to
refine its valuation methodologies. The methods described above may
produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable
value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the
Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with
other
market participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to
determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a
different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. The Company
uses inputs that are current as of the measurement date, which may include
periods of market dislocation, during which price transparency may be
reduced. This condition could cause the Company’s financial
instruments to be reclassified from Level 2 to Level 3 in future
periods.
25
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
11
.
Income
Taxes
All
income tax benefits relate to HC and are included in the results of operations
of the discontinued operation (see note 7).
Deferred
taxes at March 31, 2008 include a deferred tax asset of $0.1 million and a
deferred tax liability of $0.1 million which represents the tax effect of
differences between tax basis and financial statement carrying amounts of assets
and liabilities. The major sources of temporary differences and their deferred
tax effect at March 31, 2008 are as follows (dollar amounts in
thousands):
Deferred
tax asset:
|
|
|||
Net
operating loss carryover
|
$
|
27,920
|
||
Restricted
stock, performance shares and stock option expense
|
489
|
|||
Mark
to market adjustment
|
117
|
|||
Sec.
267 disallowance
|
268
|
|||
Charitable
contribution carryforward
|
1
|
|||
GAAP
reserves
|
939
|
|||
Rent
expense
|
186
|
|||
Loss
on sublease
|
31
|
|||
Gross
deferred tax asset
|
29,951
|
|||
Valuation
allowance
|
(29,886
|
)
|
||
Net
deferred tax asset
|
$
|
65
|
||
|
|
|||
Deferred
tax liability:
|
|
|||
Depreciation
|
$
|
65
|
||
Total
deferred tax liability
|
$
|
65
|
26
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
Deferred
taxes at December 31, 2007 include a deferred tax asset of $0.1 million and
a
deferred tax liability of $0.1 million which represents the tax effect of
differences between tax basis and financial statement carrying amounts of assets
and liabilities. The major sources of temporary differences and their deferred
tax effect at December 31, 2007 are as follows (dollar amounts in
thousands):
Deferred
tax asset:
|
|
|||
Net
operating loss carryover
|
$
|
27,434
|
||
Restricted
stock, performance shares and stock option expense
|
489
|
|||
Mark
to market adjustment
|
86
|
|||
Sec.
267 disallowance
|
268
|
|||
Charitable
contribution carryforward
|
1
|
|||
GAAP
reserves
|
994
|
|||
Rent
expense
|
252
|
|||
Loss
on sublease
|
50
|
|||
Gross
deferred tax asset
|
29,574
|
|||
Valuation
allowance
|
(29,509
|
)
|
||
Net
deferred tax asset
|
$
|
65
|
||
|
|
|||
Deferred
tax liability:
|
|
|||
Depreciation
|
$
|
65
|
||
Total
deferred tax liability
|
$
|
65
|
The
$63.1
million operating loss carry-forward expires at various intervals between 2024
and 2028. The charitable contribution carry-forward will expire in
2011.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2007 management determined that the Company
would likely not be able to utilize the deferred tax asset and accordingly
recorded a 100% valuation allowance. The Company continued to reserve 100%
of
deferred tax benefit in the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as the facts continue
to support the Company's inability to utilize the deferred tax
asset.
27
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2007
(unaudited)
12.
Segment
Reporting
Until
March 31, 2007, the Company operated two reportable segments, the mortgage
portfolio management segment and the mortgage lending segment. Upon the sale
of
substantially all the mortgage lending operating assets on March 31, 2007,
the
Company exited the mortgage lending business and accordingly will no longer
report segment information.
28
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
13
.
Stock
Incentive Plans
A
summary
of the status of the Company's options as of December 31, 2007 and changes
during the twelve months then ended is presented below:
Number
of
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2007
|
93,300
|
$
|
47.60
|
||||
Granted
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Cancelled
|
(93,300
|
)
|
47.60
|
||||
Exercised
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2007
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Options
exercisable at December 31, 2007
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
There were
no stock options outstanding at March 31, 2008 or December 31,
2007.
Restricted
Stock
The
Company has awarded 136,867 shares of restricted stock under the 2005 Plan,
of
which 100,380 shares have fully vested and 36,487 were cancelled or forfeited.
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 there were no outstanding restricted
stock awards under the 2005 Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2007 the
Company recognized non-cash compensation expense of $0.6 million relating to
the
vested portion of restricted stock grants. Dividends are paid on all restricted
stock issued, whether those shares are vested or not. In general, unvested
restricted stock is forfeited upon the recipient’s termination of
employment.
A
summary
of the status of the Company's non-vested restricted stock as of December 31,
2007 and changes during the year then ended is presented below:
Number
of
Non-vested
Restricted
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
|
||||||
Non-vested
shares at beginning of year, January 1, 2007
|
42,701
|
$
|
31.80
|
||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Forfeited
|
(31,178
|
)
|
27.90
|
||||
Vested
|
(11,523
|
)
|
43.15
|
||||
Non-vested
shares as of December 31, 2007
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Weighted-average
fair value of restricted stock granted during the period
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
29
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
14.
Capital Stock and Earnings per Share
The
Company had 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
authorized with 18,640,209 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2008
and 3,640,209 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2007. The Company
had 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share,
authorized, including 2,000,000 shares of Series A Cummulative Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series
A Preferred
Stock”)
authorized. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had
issued and outstanding 1,000,000 and 0 shares, respectively, of Series A
Preferred Stock. Of the common stock authorized, 206,222 shares (plus
forfeited shares of 65,665 previously granted) were reserved for issuance as
restricted stock awards to employees, officers and directors pursuant to the
2005 Stock Incentive Plan. As of March 31, 2008, 271,887 shares remain reserved
for issuance under the 2005 Plan.
On
February 21, 2008, the Company completed the issuance and sale of 15.0 million
shares of its common stock in a private placement at a price of $4.00 per
share. This private offering of the Company's common stock generated net
proceeds to the Company of $56.6 million after payment of private placement
fees
and expenses. In connection with this private offering of our common
stock, we entered into a registration rights agreement, which we refer to as
the
Common Stock Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which we are required
to
file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, a resale shelf
registration statement registering for resale the 15.0 million shares sold
in
this private offering. The Company filed a resale shelf registration
statement on Form S-3 on April 4, 2008 which became effective on April 18,
2008.
On
March
31, 2008 the Company paid a $0.50 per share cash dividend, or an
aggregate of $0.5 million to holders of record of our Series A Preferred
Stock
as of March 31, 2008.
The
Board
of Directors declared a one for five reverse stock split of the Company's
common
stock, as of October 9, 2007, decreasing the number of common shares outstanding
to approximately 3.6 million. All per share and share amounts provided in
the quarterly report have been restated to give effect to the reverse stock
split.
The
Company calculates basic net income (loss) per share by dividing net income
(loss) for the period by weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding
for
that period. Diluted net income (loss) per share takes into account the
effect
of dilutive instruments, such as convertible preferred stock, stock options
and unvested restricted or performance stock, but uses the average share
price
for the period in determining the number of incremental shares that are
to be
added to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding. Since the Company
is
in a loss position for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
the
calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share is the same since the
effect
of common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive.
The
following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net loss
per share
for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
For Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Numerator: | |||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(21,258
|
)
|
$
|
(4,741
|
)
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding - basic and
diluted
|
10,140
|
3,616
|
|||||
Net
loss per share - basic and diluted
|
$
|
(2.10
|
)
|
$
|
(1.31
|
)
|
15.
|
Convertible
Preferred Debentures
|
As
of
March 31, 2008, there were 1.0 million shares of our Series A Preferred Stock
outstanding, with an aggregate redemption value of $20.0 million and current
dividend payment rate of 10% per year. The Series A Preferred Stock
matures on December 31, 2010, at which time any outstanding shares
must be redeemed by the Company at the $20.00 per share liquidation
preference. Pursuant to SFAS 150, Accounting
for
Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equity, because of this mandatory redemption
feature, the
Company classifies these securities as a liability on its
balance sheet.
We
issued
these shares of its Series A Cumulative Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock,
which we refer to as our Series A Preferred Stock, to JMP Group Inc. and
certain
of its affiliates for an aggregate purchase price of $20.0 million. The Series
A
Preferred Stock entitles the holders to receive a cumulative dividend
of 10% per year, subject to an increase to the extent any future quarterly
common stock dividends exceed $0.10 per share. The Series A Preferred
Stock is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock based on a
conversion price of $4.00 per share of common stock, which represents a
conversion rate of five shares of common stock for each Series A Preferred
Stock. Pursuant to a registration rights agreement between the Company and
the investors in the private offering for the Series A Preferred Stock, in
the
event the Company fails to file a resale registration statement with the
SEC on
or before June 30, 2008, holders of our Series A Preferred Stock may be entitled
to receive an additional cash dividend at the rate of $0.10 per quarter per
share for each calendar quarter after June 30, 2008 until we file such resale
registration statement.
30
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
16.
Related Party Transactions
Concurrent
and in connection with the issuance of our Series A Preferred Stock on January
18, 2008, we entered into an advisory agreement with JMPAM, which is an
affiliate of JMP Group, Inc. and JMP Realty Trust, Inc. As of April 23, 2008,
JMPAM and JMP Group, Inc. beneficially owned approximately 16.8% and 12.2%
of
our common stock. Under the agreement, JMPAM advises two of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Hypotheca Capital, LLC (formerly known as The New York Mortgage
Company, LLC) and New York Mortgage Funding, LLC, as well as any additional
subsidiaries acquired or formed in the future to hold investments made on
our
behalf by JMPAM. We refer to these subsidiaries in our periodic reports filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as the “Managed Subsidiaries.” As
previously disclosed, we have an approximately $63.1 million net operating
loss
carry-forward that remains with us after the sale of our mortgage lending
business. As an advisor to the Managed Subsidiaries, we expect that JMPAM
will,
at some point in the future, focus on the acquisition of alternative mortgage
related investments on behalf of the Managed Subsidiaries. Some of those
investments may allow us to utilize all or a portion of the net operating
loss
carry-forward to the extent available by law. Because we intend to focus
our
investment efforts on Agency MBS, we currently have no plans to acquire
alternative mortgage related investments to be held in the Managed Subsidiaries.
The commencement of any activity by JMPAM must be approved by the Board of
Directors and any subsequent investment on behalf of Managed Subsidiaries
must
adhere to investment guidelines adopted by our board of directors. JMPAM
will
earn a base advisory fee of 1.5% of the “equity capital” (as defined in the
advisory agreement) of the Managed Subsidiaries and is also eligible to earn
incentive compensation if the Managed Subsidiaries achieve certain performance
thresholds. As of March 31, 2008, JMPAM was not managing any assets in the
Managed Subsidiaries, but was earning a base advisory fee on the net proceeds
to
our Company from our private offerings in each of January 2008 and February
2008. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, we paid JMPAM $0.1 million
in
advisory fees. As of the date of this report, we expect to pay approximately
$0.7 million in advisory fees to JMPAM during the 2008 fiscal year.
In
addition, pursuant to the stock purchase agreement providing for the sale
of the
Series A Preferred Stock to JMP Group, Inc. and certain of its affiliates,
James
J. Fowler and Steven M. Abreu were appointed to our Board of Directors, with
Mr.
Fowler being appointed the non-executive chairman of our Board of Directors.
In
addition, concurrent with the completion of the issuance and sale of the
Series
A Preferred Stock and pursuant to the stock purchase agreement, four of our
then-existing directors resigned from the Board. Pursuant to the stock purchase
agreement providing for the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock, the holders
of
our Series A Preferred Stock also have the right to appoint one additional
“independent” director, as such term is defined under the rules of the NASDAQ
Stock Market, to stand for election to our Board of Directors at our 2008
Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement,
the
additional director would replace one of our independent directors.
James
J.
Fowler, the Non-Executive Chairman of our Board of Directors and also the
non-compensated Chief Investment Officer of Hypotheca Capital, LLC and New
York
Mortgage Funding, LLC, is a managing director of JMPAM and the president
of JMP
Realty Trust, Inc., a private REIT that is externally managed by JMPAM and
which
is one of the investors in our Series A Preferred Stock. JMPAM and JMP Realty
Trust, Inc. are affiliates of JMP Group, Inc.
On
February 21, 2008, we completed the issuance of 15.0 million shares of our
common stock in a private placement to certain accredited investors, resulting
in $56.6 million in net proceeds to the Company. JMP Securities LLC, an
affiliate of JMPAM, JMP Group, Inc. and JMP Realty Trust, Inc., served as
the
sole placement agent for the transaction and was paid a $3.0 million placement
fee from the gross proceeds.
17.
Subsequent Events.
On
April
21, 2008, the Company declared a $0.06 per share cash dividend on its common
stock. The dividend is payable on May 15, 2008 to common stock of record
as of
April 30, 2008.
On
May 6, 2008, the Company entered into a five year
lease agreement for office space in Midtown Manhattan in connection with
the relocation of its corporate headquarters from 1301 Avenue of the Americas.
The lease period will commence on June 1, 2008 and provides for annual rent
of
approximately $178,000. As discussed in Note 8 above, pursuant to the Assignment
and Assumption of Sublease and the Escrow Agreement, the Company is not eligible
to receive the escrow amount from Lehman unitl IndyMac vacates the Company's
leased space at 1301 Avenue of the Americas; however, the Company will continue
to be reimbursed by IndyMac for rent and any penalties and foregone bonuses
under the Assignment and Assumption of Sublease and the Escrow
Agreement.
On
May
13, 2008, the Company declared a one-for-two reverse stock split of its common
stock by filing Articles of Amendment to its Charter with the State of Maryland.
The one-for-two reverse stock split will become effective at 12:01 a.m. on
May
27, 2008 (the “Effective Time”) and will provide shareholders of record as of
the Effective Time with one share of common stock for every two shares owned
as
of the Effective Time. Pursuant to the Articles of Amendment providing for
the
reverse stock split, fractional shares will be eliminated and stockholders
entitled to fractional shares will be entitled to receive in lieu thereof
cash
in an amount equal to the product of the fraction of a share multiplied by
the
“market price” (as defined in Section 7.1 of the Company’s Charter) on the date
of the Effective Time.
31
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are those which are not historical in nature. They
can often be identified by their inclusion of words such as “will,”
“anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend” and similar
expressions. Any projection of revenues, earnings or losses, capital
expenditures, distributions, capital structure or other financial terms is
a
forward-looking statement. Certain statements regarding the following
particularly are forward-looking in nature:
|
·
|
our
business strategy;
|
|
·
|
future
performance, developments, market forecasts or projected
dividends;
|
|
·
|
projected
acquisitions or joint ventures; and
|
|
·
|
projected
capital expenditures.
|
It
is
important to note that the description of our business in general and our
investment in mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities holdings in
particular, is a statement about our operations as of a specific point in time
and is not meant to be construed as an investment policy. The types of
assets we hold, the amount of leverage we use or the liabilities we incur and
other characteristics of our assets and liabilities disclosed in this report
as
of a specified period of time are subject to reevaluation and change without
notice.
Our
forward-looking statements are based upon our management's beliefs, assumptions
and expectations of our future operations and economic performance, taking
into
account the information currently available to us. Forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, some of which are not currently known to us
and
many of which are beyond our control and that might cause our actual results,
performance or financial condition to be materially different from the
expectations of future results, performance or financial condition we express
or
imply in any forward-looking statements. Some of the important factors that
could cause our actual results, performance or financial condition to differ
materially from expectations are:
|
·
|
our
proposed portfolio strategy may be changed or modified by our
management
without advance notice to stockholders and we may suffer losses
as a
result of such modifications or
changes;
|
|
·
|
market
changes in the terms and availability of repurchase agreements
used to
finance our investment portfolio
activities;
|
|
·
|
reduced
demand for our securities in the mortgage securitization and
secondary
markets;
|
|
·
|
interest
rate mismatches between our mortgage-backed securities and our
borrowings
used to fund such purchases;
|
|
·
|
changes
in interest rates and mortgage prepayment
rates;
|
|
·
|
effects
of interest rate caps on our adjustable-rate mortgage-backed
securities;
|
|
·
|
the
degree to which our hedging strategies may or may not protect
us from
interest rate volatility;
|
|
·
|
potential
impacts of our leveraging policies on our net income and cash
available
for distribution;
|
|
·
|
our
board's ability to change our operating policies and strategies
without
notice to you or stockholder
approval;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to manage, minimize or eliminate liabilities stemming
from the
discontinued operations including, among other things, litigation,
repurchase obligations on the sales of mortgage loans and property
leases;
and
|
|
·
|
the
other important factors identified, or incorporated by reference
into this
report, including, but not limited to those under the captions
“Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results
of Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk”, and those described under the caption “Part I. Item 1A. Risk
Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and
Exchange Commission on March 31,
2008.
|
32
We
undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described
by
our forward-looking events might not occur. We qualify any and all of our
forward-looking statements by these cautionary factors. In addition, you should
carefully review the risk factors described in other documents we file from
time
to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
General
New
York
Mortgage Trust, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries (“NYMT”, the
“Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us”) is a self-advised real estate investment
trust, or REIT, in the business of investing in residential adjustable rate
mortgage-backed securities issued by a United States government-sponsored
enterprise (“GSE” or “Agency”), such as the Federal National Mortgage
Association (“Fannie Mae”), or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(“Freddie Mac”), prime credit quality residential adjustable-rate mortgage
(“ARM”) loans, or prime ARM loans, and non-agency mortgage-backed securities. We
refer to residential adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities throughout
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as “MBS” and MBS issued by a GSE as “
Agency MBS”. We seek attractive long-term investment returns by investing our
equity capital and borrowed funds in such securities. Our principal business
objective is to generate net income for distribution to our stockholders
resulting from the spread between the interest and other income we earn on
our
interest-earning assets and the interest expense we pay on the borrowings that
we use to finance these assets, which we refer to as our net interest income.
We
believe that the best approach to generating a positive net interest income
is
to manage our liabilities, principally in the form of short-term indebtedness
(maturities of one year or less), in relation to the interest rate risks of
our
investments. To help achieve this result, we employ repurchase
agreement financing, generally short-term, and over time will combine our
financings with hedging techniques, primarily interest rate swaps. We may,
subject to maintaining our REIT qualification, also employ other hedging
techniques from time to time, including interest rate caps, floors and swap
options to protect against adverse interest rate movements.
As
of
March 31, 2008, our investment portfolio was comprised of $512.6 million
in MBS,
including $261.8 of Agency MBS, $224.3 million of Agency CMO floaters and
$26.5
million of non-Agency MBS, of which $25.8 million are rated in the highest
category by two rating agencies (either Moody's Investor Service, Inc. or
Standard & Poor's, Inc.), and $398.3 million of prime ARM
loans held in securitization trusts. As of March 31, 2008, we had
approximately $931.8 million of total assets as compared to $809.3 million
at December 31, 2007.
Implementation
of Alternative Investment Strategy Under Our Advisory
Agreement
Since
inception, our investment portfolio strategy has focused on the acquisition
of
high-credit quality ARM loans and securities. Moreover, since our exit from
the
mortgage lending business on March 31, 2007, we have exclusively focused
our
resources and efforts on investing, on a leveraged basis, in MBS and, since
August 2007, we have employed a portfolio strategy that focuses on
investments in Agency MBS. In connection with our exit from the mortgage
lending
business, we have an approximately $63.1 million net operating loss
carry-forward from one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. As previously disclosed
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007,
concurrent with the issuance of our Series A Preferred Stock on January 18,
2008, we entered into an advisory agreement with JMP Asset Management LLC
(“JMPAM”), an affiliate of JMP Group, Inc. Under the advisory agreement, JMPAM
advises two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hypotheca Capital, LLC, or
HC
(formerly known as The New York Mortgage Company, LLC), and New York Mortgage
Funding, LLC, as well as any additional subsidiaries acquired or formed in
the
future to hold investments made on our behalf by JMPAM. We refer to these
subsidiaries in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as the “Managed Subsidiaries.” As an advisor to the Managed
Subsidiaries, we expect that JMPAM will focus on the acquisition of alternative
mortgage related investments on behalf of the Managed Subsidiaries. We
expect
this alternative mortgage-related investment strategy to primarily take the
form
of equity investments in unaffiliated third
party entities, or Funds, that acquire
or manage a portfolio of non-Agency MBS, some or all of which may be classified
as non-investment grade securities. Some
of
those investments may allow us to utilize all or a portion of the net
operating loss carry-forward, to the extent available by law. Although our
investment strategy thus far in 2008 has focused on the acquisition of Agency
MBS, JMPAM may commence investments under this alternative mortgage related
investment strategy in the near future; provided,
however, that
the
commencement of investments by JMPAM under this strategy must first be approved
by our board of directors and any subsequent investment on behalf of Managed
Subsidiaries must adhere to investment guidelines adopted by our board of
directors. This strategy, if and when implemented, will vary from our core
strategy and we can provide no assurance that we or JMPAM will be successful
at
implementing any alternative investment strategy.
Significant
Events During 2008 First Quarter
Recent
Market Volatility
Commencing
mid-year 2007, the residential mortgage market in the United States began
experiencing a variety of significant difficulties and changed economic
conditions, including defaults, credit losses and liquidity concerns, many
of
which continue to exist as of the date of this report. In
January and February 2008, however, mortgage-backed security industry
fundamentals began to stabilize as compared to fundamentals in the third and
fourth quarter of 2007. As discussed below, we received net proceeds of
approximately $76.2 million from equity offerings in January and February 2008
and used substantially all of the net proceeds, in combination with borrowings
under our repurchase agreements, to acquire approximately $714.1 million of
Agency ARM MBS.
During
March 2008, news of potential and actual security liquidations increased the
price volatility and liquidity of many financial assets, including Agency MBS
and other high-quality mortgage securities and loans. As a result, market values
for, and available liquidity to finance, certain mortgage securities, including
some of our Agency MBS and AAA-rated non-Agency MBS, were negatively impacted.
As a response to these changed conditions, which impacted a relatively broad
range of leveraged public and private companies with investment and financing
strategies similar to ours, the Company undertook a number of strategic actions
during March 2008 to reduce leverage and raise liquidity in the portfolio of
Agency MBS. Commencing March 7, 2008 through March 17, 2008, the Company sold,
in aggregate, approximately $592.8 million of Agency MBS from its investment
portfolio that was comprised of $516.4 million of Agency hybrid ARM MBS and
$76.4 million of Agency CMO floating rate MBS (“CMO Floaters”).
These sales resulted in a loss of $15.0 million. Additionally, as a result
of
these sales of MBS, we terminated associated interest rate swaps that were
used
to hedge our liability costs with a notional balance of $297.7 million at a
cost
of $2.0 million. As of March 31, 2008, our MBS portfolio totaled $512.6 million
and was comprised of $261.8 million of Agency hybrid ARM MBS, $224.3 million
of CMO Floaters and $25.8 million of AAA-rated non-Agency MBS. As of March
31, 2008, in aggregate, our Agency MBS portfolio was financed with $431.6
million of reverse repurchase agreement borrowings (referred to as “repo”
borrowings) with an average advance rate of 91% that implies an average haircut
of 9% for the entire portfolio. Within our Agency MBS portfolio, our Agency
hybrid ARM MBS is financed with $230.2 million of repurchase agreements funding
equating to an advance rate of 94% that implies a haircut of 6% and our Agency
CMO Floaters are financed with $180.7 million of repurchase agreement financing
equating to an advance rate of 88% that implies a haircut of 12%. The Company
also owns $398.3 million of adjustable rate mortgages that were deemed to be
of
“prime” or high quality at the time of origination. These loans are permanently
financed with approximately $386.5 million of collateralized debt obligations
and are held in securitization trusts.
We
generally finance our portfolio of Agency MBS and non-Agency MBS through
repurchase agreements. In connection with the 2008 market disruption,
repurchase agreement lenders have tightened their lending standards and have
done so in a manner that now distinguishes between “type” of Agency MBS. For
example, during the month of March 2008, lenders generally increased haircuts
on
Agency Hybrid ARMs from 3% to 5% and in some cases up to 10%. Also, haircuts
on
Agency CMO Floaters increased from 5% to a range of 10% to 20%, largely
dependent upon cash flow structure.
33
Private
Placement
of
Common Stock
On
February 21, 2008, we completed the issuance and sale of 15.0 million shares
of
our common stock to certain accredited investors (as such term is defined
in
Rule 501 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
Securities Act) at a price of $4.00 per share. This private offering of our
common stock generated net proceeds to us of approximately $56.6 million
after
payment of private placement fees and expenses. Prior to this issuance of
common stock, we had 3,640,209 shares of common stock outstanding. In connection
with this transaction, we entered into a registration rights agreement (
the
“Common
Stock
Registration Right Agreement”), pursuant
to
which we were required to, among other things, file a resale shelf registration
statement providing for the resale of these shares.
Private
Placement of Convertible Preferred Stock to
JMP Group Inc. and Certain of its Affiliates
On
January 18, 2008, we issued 1.0 million shares of our Series A Cumulative
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, which we refer to as the Series A
Preferred Stock, to JMP Group, Inc. and certain of its affiliates for an
aggregate purchase price of $20.0 million. The Series A Preferred Stock entitles
the holders to receive a cumulative dividend of 10% per year, subject to an
increase to the extent any future quarterly common stock dividends exceed $0.10
per share. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock mature on December 31,
2010, and are convertible into shares of our common stock based on a
conversion price of $4.00 per share of common stock, which represents a
conversion rate of five shares of common stock for each share of Series A
Preferred Stock. Under certain circumstances, the Series A Preferred Stock
will
automatically convert into shares of our common stock. In addition, under the
terms of the Series A Preferred Stock, holders have the option to convert,
at
any time, their shares of Series A Preferred Stock into shares of our common
stock. The Series A Preferred Stock may also be redeemed by the Company in
connection with certain change of control events. The Series A Preferred Stock
has voting rights that allow the holders to vote with the common stock, voting
together as a single class on an “as converted” basis, and the holders have the
right to appoint one additional “independent” director, as such term is defined
under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, to stand for election to our board
of directors at our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in June 2008.
At their option, the holders had the option to purchase up to an additional
$20.0 million of Series A Preferred Stock, on identical terms, through April
4,
2008. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock did not exercise the
option.
Advisory
Agreement with JMPAM
As
described above, concurrent with the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock,
we entered into an advisory agreement with JMPAM. For
more
information on our relationship with JMPAM and the risks and conflicts related
thereto, see “Our Relationship with JMPAM and the Advisory Agreement” under Item
1 and “Risks Related to the Advisory Agreement with JMPAM — There are
conflicts of interest in our relationship with JMPAM, which could result in
decisions that are not in the best interests of shareholders” under Item 1A of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Changes
in the Composition of the Board of Directors
Upon
completion of the issuance and sale of the Series A Preferred Stock on January
18, 2008 and pursuant to the stock purchase agreement providing for the sale
of
the Series A Preferred Stock, James J. Fowler and Steven M. Abreu were appointed
to our board of directors, with Mr. Fowler being appointed the non-executive
chairman of our board of directors. Mr. Fowler also serves as the Chief
Investment Officer of the Managed Subsidiaries. Mr. Fowler is a managing
director of JMPAM and president of JMP Realty Trust, Inc., a private REIT that
is externally managed by JMPAM and an investor in our Series A Preferred Stock.
In addition, concurrent with the completion of the issuance and sale of the
Series A Preferred Stock and pursuant to the stock purchase agreement, Steven
B.
Schnall, Mary Dwyer Pembroke, Jerome F. Sherman and Thomas W. White resigned
as
members of our board of directors, thereby reducing the size of our board of
directors to seven directors. Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement providing
for the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock, the holders of our Series A
Preferred Stock also have the right to appoint one additional "independent"
director, as such term is defined under the rules of NASDAQ Stock Market, to
stand for election to our board of directors at our 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held in June 2008.
34
Declines
in the prices of mortgage assets
-
Investors’ appetite for U.S. mortgage assets continued to be weak in the first
quarter of 2008. In addition, the market disruption of March 2008 and related
de-leveraging in the mortgage asset industry involved the liquidation or
sale of
a significant amount of Agency securities. This selling, along with decreased
demand for these assets among investors, caused mortgage asset prices to
decline
in the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
Tightening
in the financing markets and reduced liquidity -
As
prices of mortgage assets decreased, many lenders that finance mortgage assets
took measures to insure their liquidity needs would not be compromised.
Principally, many financial institutions withdrew financing and liquidity
that
they typically offered clients as part of their daily business operations.
The
most common forms of liquidity provided to the mortgage market are in the
form
of repurchase agreements for MBS. This reduced availability of financing
led to
de-leveraging by many in the industry and, in some cases, forced liquidations,
all of which exacerbated the problem.
Volatility
in financing costs.
The
dislocations in the mortgage market led to increased volatility in the cost
of
financing. The relationships between certain short-term interest rates, normally
very consistent, became less so in the second half of 2007 and continued
to
widen during the first quarter of 2008. The Federal Funds rate, an interest
rate
used by banks for overnight loans to each other and determined by the Federal
Reserve Board, is a benchmark used by others to determine similar short term
rates. The London Inter Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), a market determined rate
for short term loans, is typically 10 basis points higher than the
Federal Funds rate. As of May 1, 2008 the LIBOR index is approximately 70
basis
points higher than the Fed Funds rate of 2.00%. Because our repurchase
agreements rates generally move with one month LIBOR, our costs have
not decreased on a relative basis as would be expected given the 225 basis
points reduction in the Fed Funds rate.
Hedging.
We
generally seek to reduce the volatility of our net income by entering into
interest rate swap agreements. As of March 31, 2008, we had entered into
interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $168 million.
The Company discontinued hedge accounting treatment for the interest rate
swap
positions during the fourth quarter of 2007 as part of a strategic portfolio
realignment related to the Series A Preferred Stock offering by the Company.
Accordingly, the unrealized loss was recorded as an unrealized loss in the
Statement of Operations and no longer reflected as part of other comprehensive
income in the Balance Sheet. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008 the
Company
terminated certain swaps resulting in a realized loss of $4.8
million.
Changes
in the U.S. economy.
Changes
in the U.S. economy have also affected us. The U.S. economy continued to
soften
in the first quarter of 2008. Adverse trends in the housing market and increased
stress on borrowers, including in particular, residential mortgage borrowers,
has had a ripple effect throughout the U.S. economy. The Federal Reserve
continued to reduce short term interest rates resulting in an overall reduction
of 200 basis points during the first quarter of 2008 with another 25 basis
points reduction on May 1, 2008. Recently, increased concern regarding inflation
has arisen principally due to increases in global commodity prices. We believe
the inflation concerns have kept longer term interest rates high relative
to
short term rates. This so called steep yield curve generally results in
increased returns on equity for companies that employ an Agency MBS strategy
similar to ours. The possibility of rising inflation, however, increases
the possibility of interest rates moving higher to slow inflationary
stresses.
35
Loan
repurchase requests -
As of
March 31, 2008, we had $4.7 million of outstanding repurchase requests, against
which the Company has a reserve of $0.7 million. The Company repurchased
no
loans during the first quarter of 2008 and anticipates settling the majority
of
the outstanding requests during the second quarter.
Presentation
Format
In
connection with the sale of substantially all of our wholesale and retail
mortgage lending platform assets during the first quarter of 2007, we classified
certain assets and liabilities related to our mortgage lending segment as a
discontinued operation in accordance with the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 144. As a result, we have reported revenues
and expenses related to the segment as a discontinued operation and the related
assets and liabilities as assets and liabilities related to a discontinued
operation for all periods presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements. Our continuing operations are primarily comprised of
what
had been our portfolio management operations. In addition, certain assets such
as the deferred tax asset, and certain liabilities, such as subordinated debt
and liabilities related to leased facilities not assigned to Indymac, have
become part of the ongoing operations of NYMT and accordingly, we have not
classified as a discontinued operation in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144.
The
Board
of Directors declared a one for five reverse stock split of our common
stock, providing shareholders of record as of October 9, 2007, with one share
of
common stock for each five shares owned of record as of October 9, 2007 (the
"Reverse Stock Split"). The reduction in shares resulting from the reverse
stock
split was effective on October 9, 2007, decreasing the number of common shares
outstanding to approximately 3.6 million. Prior period share amounts and
earnings per share disclosures have been restated to reflect the reverse stock
split.
Significance
of Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies
We
prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or
GAAP, many of which require the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions
that
affect reported amounts. These estimates are based, in part, on our judgment
and
assumptions regarding various economic conditions that we believe are reasonable
based on facts and circumstances existing at the time of reporting. The results
of these estimates affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities and
accumulated other comprehensive income at the date of the condensed consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of income, expenses and other
comprehensive income during the periods presented.
Changes
in the estimates and assumptions could have a material effect on these financial
statements. Accounting policies and estimates related to specific components
of
our condensed consolidated financial statements are disclosed in the notes
to
our condensed consolidated financial statements. In accordance with SEC
guidance, those material accounting policies and estimates that we believe
are
most critical to an investor's understanding of our financial results and
condition and which require complex management judgment are discussed
below.
Revenue
Recognition.
Interest income on our residential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities
is a combination of the interest earned based on the outstanding principal
balance of the underlying loan/security, the contractual terms of the assets
and
the amortization of yield adjustments, principally premiums and discounts,
using
generally accepted interest methods. The net GAAP cost over the par balance
of
self-originated mortgage loans held for investment and the premium and discount
associated with the purchase of mortgage-backed securities and loans are
amortized into interest income over the lives of the underlying assets using
the
effective yield method as adjusted for the effects of estimated prepayments.
Estimating prepayments and the remaining term of our interest yield investments
require management judgment, which involves, among other things, consideration
of possible future interest rate environments and an estimate of how borrowers
will react to those environments, historical trends and performance of those
interest yield investments. The actual prepayment speed and actual lives could
be more or less than the amount estimated by management at the time of
origination or purchase of the assets or at each financial reporting
period.
36
Fair
Value.
On
January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes
a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS
157
clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction
between
market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the market
in
which the reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability, that
is,
the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability. The transaction to sell the asset or transfer the
liability is a hypothetical transaction at the measurement date, considered
from
the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the
liability. SFAS 157 provides a consistent definition of fair value
which focuses on exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair
value,
the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. In
addition, SFAS 157 provides a framework for measuring fair value, and
establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon
the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the
measurement date.
The
three
levels of valuation hierarchy established by SFAS 157 are defined as
follows:
Level
1
- inputs
to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical
assets
or liabilities in active markets.
Level
2
- inputs
to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset
or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term
of the
financial instrument.
Level
3
- inputs
to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair
value
measurement.
A
financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based
upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. Our investment securities, which are primarily comprised
of Agency ARM-MBS, are valued by a third party pricing service primarily
based
upon readily observable market parameters and are classified within Level
2 of
the valuation hierarchy. Our interest rate swaps are valued
using external third party bid quotes and internally developed models that
apply
readily observable market parameters and are classified within Level 2 of
the
valuation hierarchy.
We
have
established and documented processes for determining our fair values and
base
fair value on quoted market prices, when available. If listed prices
or quotes are not available, then fair value is based upon internally developed
models that primarily use inputs that are market-based or independently-sourced
market parameters, including interest rate yield curves.
Any
changes to the valuation methodology are reviewed by management to ensure
the
changes are appropriate. As markets and products develop and the
pricing for certain products becomes more transparent, we continue to refine
our
valuation methodologies. The methods used by us may produce a fair
value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or
reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while we believe our
valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants,
the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to determine the fair
value
of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of
fair
value at the reporting date. We use inputs that are current as of the
measurement date, which may include periods of market dislocation, during
which
price transparency may be reduced. This condition could cause our
financial instruments to be reclassified from Level 2 to Level 3 in the
future.
Securitizations.
We have
created securitization entities as a means of either:
|
·
|
creating
securities backed by mortgage loans which we continue to hold and
finance
that are more liquid than holding whole loan assets;
or
|
|
·
|
securing
long-term collateralized financing for our residential mortgage loan
portfolio and matching the income earned on residential mortgage
loans
with the cost of related liabilities, otherwise referred to as match
funding our balance sheet.
|
37
Residential
mortgage loans are transferred to a separate bankruptcy-remote legal entity
from
which private-label multi-class mortgage-backed notes are issued. On a
consolidated basis, securitizations are accounted for as secured financings
as
defined by SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (“SFAS No. 140”), and, therefore,
no gain or loss is recorded in connection with the securitizations. Each
securitization entity is evaluated in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation (“FIN”) 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities”, and we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary
of the securitization entities. As such, the securitization entities are
consolidated into our consolidated balance sheet subsequent to securitization.
Residential mortgage loans transferred to securitization entities collateralize
the mortgage-backed notes issued, and, as a result, those investments are not
available to us, our creditors or stockholders. All discussions relating to
securitizations are on a consolidated basis and do not necessarily reflect
the
separate legal ownership of the loans by the related bankruptcy-remote legal
entity.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
- The
Company has developed risk management programs and processes, which include
investments in derivative financial instruments designed to manage market risk
associated with its mortgage-backed securities investment
activities.
All
derivative financial instruments are reported as either assets or liabilities
in
the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The gains and losses associated
with changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedges are
reported in current earnings. If the derivative is designated as a fair value
hedge and is highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in the fair value
of the asset or liability hedged, the recorded value of the hedged item is
adjusted by its change in fair value attributable to the hedged risk. If the
derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of change
in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in OCI and is recognized in
the
income statement when the hedged item affects earnings. The Company calculates
the effectiveness of these hedges on an ongoing basis, and, to date, has
calculated effectiveness of approximately 100% of these hedges. Ineffective
portions, if any, of changes in the fair value or cash flow hedges are
recognized in earnings.
New
Accounting Pronouncements - On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements,
which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements.
In
June
2007, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 06-11, Accounting
for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment
Awards.
EITF
Issue No. 06-11 requires that the tax benefit related to dividend
equivalents paid on restricted stock units, which are expected to vest, be
recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. The Company
currently accounts for this tax benefit as a reduction to income tax expense.
EITF Issue No. 06-11 is to be applied prospectively for tax benefits on
dividends declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and
the Company expects to adopt the provisions of EITF Issue No. 06-11
beginning in the first quarter of 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption
of EITF Issue No. 06-11 to have a material effect on its financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The
changes to previous practice resulting from the application of SFAS 157
relate
to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value,
and the
expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The definition of
fair value retains the exchange price notion used in earlier definitions
of fair
value. SFAS 157 clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an
orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer
the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact
for the
asset or liability, that is, the principal or most advantageous market
for the
asset or liability. The transaction to sell the asset or transfer the
liability is a hypothetical transaction at the measurement date, considered
from
the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the
liability. SFAS 157 provides a consistent definition of fair value
which focuses on exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair
value,
the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. In
addition, SFAS 157 provides a framework for measuring fair value, and
establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon
the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of
the
measurement date (see note 10).
On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities,
which
provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and
liabilities at fair value.
The
objective of SFAS No. 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for
financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring
related
assets and liabilities differently. SFAS No. 159 establishes presentation
and
disclosure requirements and requires companies to provide additional information
that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more
easily
understand the effect of the Company's choice to use fair value on its
earnings.
SFAS No. 159 also requires entities to display the fair value of those
assets
and liabilities for which the Company has chosen to use fair value on the
face
of the balance sheet. The Company’s adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material
impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements as the Company
did not
elect the fair value option for any of its existing financial assets or
liabilities as of January 1, 2008.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 140-3, Accounting
for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing
Transactions.
SFAS
No. 140-3 requires an initial transfer of a financial asset and a
repurchase financing that was entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation
of the initial transfer to be evaluated as a linked transaction under
SFAS No. 140 unless certain criteria are met, including that the
transferred asset must be readily obtainable in the marketplace. FSP
No. 140-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008, and will be applied to new transactions entered into after the date
of
adoption. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact of adopting FSP No. 140-3 on its financial condition and cash
flows. Adoption of FSP No. 140-3 will have no effect on the Company’s
results of operations.
38
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133.
SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s
derivative and hedging activities, and is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early
application encouraged. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 161 in the
first quarter of 2009. Because SFAS No. 161 requires only
additional disclosures concerning derivatives and hedging activities, adoption
of SFAS No. 161 will not affect the Company’s financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
Loan
Loss Reserves on Mortgage Loans—
We
evaluate a reserve for loan losses based on management's judgment and estimate
of credit losses inherent in our portfolio of mortgage loans held for sale
and
mortgage loans held in securitization trusts.
Estimation
involves the consideration of various credit-related factors including
but not
limited to, the current housing market conditions, loan-to-value ratios,
delinquency status, historical credit loss severity rates, purchased mortgage
insurance, the borrower's credit and other factors deemed to warrant
consideration. Additionally,
we look at the balance of any delinquent loan and compare that to the value
of
the property. Using the lower of the original purchase price or appraised
value
as
a benchmark, we either utilize various internet based property data services
to
look at comparable properties in the same area, or consult with a realtor
in the
property's
area, to determine the property’s current value.
Comparing
the current loan balance to the current property value determines the current
loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio of the loan. Generally, for mortgage loans held in
securitization trusts, all of which are first liens, we estimate that if
a loan
goes into the foreclosure process, resulting in real estate owned (“REO”), it
will be disposed of at approximately 68% of the property’s current value, after
expenses. With respect to our portfolio of mortgage loans held for sale,
which
generally consists of mortgage loans originated in 2006 and 2007, we assume
a
first lien on a property that goes into a foreclosure process and becomes
REO
will result in the property being disposed of at approximately 65% of the
property’s current value, net of expenses. This estimate is based on
management’s experience in similar market conditions. Thus, for a first lien
loan that is 60 or more days delinquent, we will adjust the property value
down
to approximately 68% or 65% of the original property’s current value, as
applicable depending on the loan classification, and compare that to the
current
balance of the loan. The difference determines the base reserve taken for
that
loan. This base reserve for a particular loan may be adjusted if we are aware
of
specific circumstances that may affect the outcome of the loss mitigation
process for that loan. Predominately, however, we use the base reserve number
for our reserve.
Reserves
for second liens, all of which are mortgage loans held for sale, are larger
than
that for first liens as second liens are in a junior position and only receive
proceeds after the claims of the first lien holder are satisfied. Given the
softness in the housing market due to the increased properties listed for sale,
we currently assume that second mortgages will return approximately 5% or less
of their original balance for loans that go through foreclosure. As with first
liens, we may occasionally alter the base reserve calculation but that is in
a
minority of the cases and only if we are aware of specific circumstances that
pertain to that specific loan.
At
March
31, 2008, we had a loan loss reserve of $1.2 million on mortgage loans held
for
sale, $0.7 million in reserves for indemnifications and repurchase requests
and
a $3.1 million loan loss reserve for mortgage loans held in securitization
trusts. The Company incurred $1.8 million of total loan losses during the three
months ended March 31, 2008, including $1.4 million from loans held in
securitization trusts and $0.4 million from loans held for sale in the
discontinued operations.
Overview
of Performance
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008, we reported a net loss of $21.3 million
as
compared to a net loss of $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007.
The
main
components of the increase in loss for the three months ended March 31, 2008
as
compared to the same period for the previous period are detailed in the
following table:
Detailed Components of increase in loss |
for
the three months ended March 31,
|
|||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
Change
|
||||||||
Net
interest income on investment portfolio
|
$
|
2,739
|
$
|
629
|
$
|
2,110
|
||||
Loss
on investment securities and related hedges
|
(19,848
|
)
|
-
|
(19,848
|
)
|
|||||
Loan
loss reserve on loans held in securitization trust
|
(1,433
|
)
|
-
|
(1,433
|
)
|
|||||
Total
Expenses
|
1,431
|
647
|
784
|
|||||||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations - net of tax
|
$
|
180
|
$
|
(3,841
|
)
|
$
|
4,021
|
39
Summary
of Operations and Key Performance Measurements
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008, our income was dependent upon the net
interest (interest income on portfolio assets net of the interest expense and
hedging costs associated with the financing of such assets) generated from
our
portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans held in the
securitization trusts.
The
key
performance measures for our portfolio management activities are:
|
·
|
net
interest spread on the portfolio;
|
|
·
|
characteristics
of the investments and the underlying pool of mortgage loans including
but
not limited to credit quality, coupon and prepayment rates;
and
|
|
·
|
return
on our mortgage asset investments and the related management of interest
rate risk.
|
Financial
Condition
As
of
March 31, 2008, we had approximately $931.8 million of total assets, as compared
to approximately $809.3 million of total assets as of December 31, 2007. The
increase in total assets results primarily from an increase in mortgage-backed
securities of $162.1 million and a decrease of $32.4 million in mortgage loans
held in securitization trust.
The
Company received net proceeds of approximately $19.6 million from
our Series A Preferred Stock offering and $56.6 million from
our common stock offering during the first quarter of 2008. The Company
used substantially all of the net proceeds to purchase approximately $714.1
million of Agency MBS during January and February 2008. As discussed above
under
“–
Significant Events During 2008 First Quarter –
Recent Market
Volatility,”
the Company sold an aggregate of $592.8 million of Agency MBS in its portfolio
during March 2008 in an effort to reduce its leverage and improve its liquidity
position in response to the market disruption of March 2008.
Balance
Sheet Analysis - Asset Quality
Investment
Securities - Available for Sale
- Our
securities portfolio consists of Agency securities or AAA-rated residential
mortgage-backed securities. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had
no
investment securities in a single issuer or entity (other than a government
sponsored agency of the U.S. Government) that had an aggregate book value in
excess of 10% of our total assets. The following tables set forth the credit
characteristics of our securities portfolio as of March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Credit
Characteristics of Our Investment Securities
March
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Sponsor
or
Rating
|
Par
Value
|
Carrying
Value
|
%
of
Portfolio
|
Coupon
|
Yield
|
||||||||||||||
Agency
REMIC CMO floaters
|
FNMA/FHLMC
|
$
|
232,435
|
$
|
224,262
|
44
|
%
|
3.60
|
%
|
4.12
|
%
|
||||||||
Agency
Hybrid Arms
|
FNMA/FHLMC
|
257,746
|
261,778
|
51
|
%
|
5.15
|
%
|
4.22
|
%
|
||||||||||
Non-Agency
floaters
|
AAA
|
29,558
|
23,683
|
5
|
%
|
3.41
|
%
|
7.44
|
%
|
||||||||||
NYMT
retained securities
|
AAA-BBB
|
2,169
|
2,154
|
0
|
%
|
6.93
|
%
|
5.27
|
%
|
||||||||||
NYMT
retained securities
|
Below
BBB
|
2,753
|
673
|
0
|
%
|
5.69
|
%
|
12.75
|
%
|
||||||||||
Total/Weighted
average
|
|
$
|
524,661
|
$
|
512,550
|
100
|
%
|
4.38
|
%
|
4.41
|
%
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Sponsor
or
Rating
|
Par
Value
|
Carrying
Value
|
%
of
Portfolio
|
Coupon
|
Yield
|
||||||||||||||
Agency
REMIC CMO floaters
|
FNMA/FHLMC
|
$
|
324,676
|
$
|
318,689
|
91
|
%
|
5.98
|
%
|
5.55
|
%
|
||||||||
Non-Agency
floaters
|
AAA
|
29,764
|
28,401
|
8
|
%
|
5.66
|
%
|
5.50
|
%
|
||||||||||
NYMT
retained securities
|
AAA-BBB
|
2,169
|
2,165
|
1
|
%
|
6.31
|
%
|
6.28
|
%
|
||||||||||
NYMT
retained securities
|
Below
BBB
|
2,756
|
1,229
|
0
|
%
|
5.68
|
%
|
12.99
|
%
|
||||||||||
Total/Weighted
average
|
$
|
359,365
|
$
|
350,484
|
100
|
%
|
5.95
|
%
|
5.61
|
%
|
40
The
following table sets forth the stated reset periods and weighted average yields
of our investment securities at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollar
amounts in thousands):
Reset/
Yield of our Investment Securities
Less than
6 Months
|
More than 6
Months
To 24 Months
|
More than 24
Months
To 60 Months
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
March
31, 2008
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average Yield
|
Carrying Value |
Weighted
Average Yield
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Agency
REMIC CMO floaters
|
$
|
224,262
|
4.12
|
%
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
$
|
224,262
|
4.12
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Agency
Hybrid Arms
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
261,778
|
4.22
|
%
|
261,778
|
4.22
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency
floaters
|
23,683
|
7.44
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
23,683
|
7.44
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
NYMT
retained securities
|
—
|
—
|
2,154
|
5.27
|
673
|
12.75
|
%
|
2,827
|
9.45
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted
average
|
$
|
247,945
|
4.50
|
%
|
$
|
2,154
|
5.27
|
$
|
262,451
|
4.31
|
%
|
$
|
512,550
|
4.41
|
%
|
Less
than
6
Months
|
More than 6 Months
To 24 Months
|
More than 24 Months
To 60 Months
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2007
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Agency
REMIC CMO Floating Rate
|
$
|
318,689
|
5.55
|
%
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
%
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
%
|
$
|
318,689
|
5.55
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Non-Agency floaters
|
28,401
|
5.50
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
%
|
28,401
|
5.50
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
NYMT
Retained Securities
|
2,165
|
6.28
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
%
|
1,229
|
12.99
|
%
|
3,394
|
10.03
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted
Average
|
$
|
349,255
|
5.55
|
%
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
%
|
$
|
1,229
|
12.99
|
%
|
$
|
350,484
|
5.61
|
%
|
Mortgage
Loans Held in Securitization Trusts
-
Included in our portfolio are ARM loans that we originated or purchased in
bulk from third parties that met our investment criteria and portfolio
requirements. These loans are classified as “mortgage loans held for investment”
during a period of aggregation and until the portfolio reaches a size sufficient
for us to securitize such loans. If the securitization qualifies as a
financing for SFAS No. 140 purposes, the loans are then re-classified as
“mortgage loans held in securitization trusts.”
New
York
Mortgage Trust 2006-1, our most recent securitization, qualified as a
sale under SFAS No. 140, which resulted in the recording of residual assets
and
mortgage servicing rights. As of March 31, 2008 the residual assets totaled
$0.7
million and are included in investment securities available for
sale.
41
Except
for the loans in securitization trusts, there were no mortgage loans held for
investment at March 31, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
The
following table details mortgage loans held in securitization trusts at March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Par Value
|
Coupon
|
Carrying Value
|
Yield
|
||||||||||
March
31, 2008
|
$
|
398,875
|
5.73
|
%
|
$
|
398,323
|
5.02
|
%
|
|||||
December
31, 2007
|
$
|
429,629
|
5.74
|
%
|
$
|
430,715
|
5.36
|
%
|
At
March
31, 2008 mortgage loans held in securitization trusts totaled approximately
$398.3 million, or 43% of our total assets. Of this mortgage loan investment
portfolio, 100% are traditional ARMs or hybrid ARMs and 78% are ARM loans that
are interest only. On our hybrid ARMs, interest rate reset periods are
predominately five years or less and the interest-only/amortization period
is
typically 10 years, which mitigates the “payment shock” at the time of interest
rate reset. No loans in our investment portfolio of mortgage loans are
option-ARMs or ARMs with negative amortization.
Characteristics
of Our Mortgage Loans Held in Securitization Trusts and Retained Interests
in
Securitization:
The
following table sets forth the composition of our portfolio of
mortgage loans held in securitization trusts and retained interests in our
REMIC securitization, NYMT 2006-1 as of March 31, 2008 (dollar amounts in
thousands):
#
of Loans
|
Par
Value
|
Carrying
Value
|
||||||||
Loan
Characteristics:
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Mortgage
loans held in securitization trusts
|
907
|
$
|
398,875
|
$
|
398,323
|
|||||
Retained
interest in securitization (included in Investment securities
available for sale)
|
378
|
202,449
|
2,826
|
|||||||
Total
Loans Held
|
1,285
|
$
|
601,324
|
$
|
401,149
|
Average
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||||||
General Loan Characteristics: | ||||||||||||
Original
Loan Balance
|
$
|
490
|
$
|
3,500
|
$
|
48
|
||||||
Coupon
Rate
|
5.80
|
%
|
9.93
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
||||||
Gross
Margin
|
2.35
|
%
|
6.50
|
%
|
1.13
|
%
|
||||||
Lifetime
Cap
|
11.20
|
%
|
13.75
|
%
|
9.13
|
%
|
||||||
Original
Term (Months)
|
360
|
360
|
360
|
|||||||||
Remaining
Term (Months)
|
328
|
336
|
292
|
42
The
following table sets forth the composition of our portfolio mortgage loans
held
in securitization trusts and retained interests in our REMIC securitization,
NYMT 2006-1 as of December 31, 2007:
#
of Loans
|
Par
Value
|
Carrying
Value
|
||||||||
Loan
Characteristics:
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Mortgage
loans held in securitization trusts
|
972
|
$
|
429,629
|
$
|
430,715
|
|||||
Retained
interest in securitization (included in Investment securities
available for sale)
|
391
|
209,455
|
3,394
|
|||||||
Total
Loans Held
|
1,363
|
$
|
639,084
|
$
|
434,109
|
General Loan Characteristics: |
Average
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||||||
Original
Loan Balance
|
$
|
490
|
$
|
3,500
|
$
|
48
|
||||||
Coupon
Rate
|
5.79
|
%
|
9.93
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
||||||
Gross
Margin
|
2.34
|
%
|
6.50
|
%
|
1.13
|
%
|
||||||
Lifetime
Cap
|
11.19
|
%
|
13.75
|
%
|
9.00
|
%
|
||||||
Original
Term (Months)
|
360
|
360
|
360
|
|||||||||
Remaining
Term (Months)
|
330
|
339
|
295
|
The
following tables provide additional characteristics of the mortgage loans held
in securitization trusts and retained interests in securitization as of March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
Arm Loan Type: |
March
31,
2008
Percentage
|
December 31,
2007
Percentage
|
|||||
Traditional
ARMs
|
2.2
|
%
|
2.3
|
%
|
|||
2/1
Hybrid ARMs
|
1.3
|
%
|
1.6
|
%
|
|||
3/1
Hybrid ARMs
|
8.6
|
%
|
10.2
|
%
|
|||
5/1
Hybrid ARMs
|
85.3
|
%
|
83.4
|
%
|
|||
7/1
Hybrid ARMs
|
2.6
|
%
|
2.5
|
%
|
|||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
Percent
of ARM loans that are Interest Only
|
77.8
|
%
|
77.3
|
%
|
|||
Weighted
average length of interest only period
|
8.3
years
|
8.3
years
|
Traditional ARMs - Periodic Cap(1): |
March
31,
2008
Percentage
|
December 31,
2007
Percentage
|
|||||
None
|
79.2
|
%
|
72.9
|
%
|
|||
1%
|
1.6
|
%
|
1.4
|
%
|
|||
Over
1%
|
19.2
|
%
|
25.7
|
%
|
|||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
(1)
|
Periodic
caps refer to the maximum amount by which the mortgage rate on any
mortgage loan may increase or decrease on a periodic adjustment date
set forth in the loan
agreement.
|
43
Hybrid ARMs - Initial Cap(2): |
March
31,
2008
Percentage
|
December 31,
2007
Percentage
|
|||||
3.00%
or less
|
7.3
|
%
|
8.3
|
%
|
|||
3.01%-4.00%
|
4.4
|
%
|
5.1
|
%
|
|||
4.01%-5.00%
|
87.3
|
%
|
85.6
|
%
|
|||
5.01%-6.00%
|
1.0
|
%
|
1.0
|
%
|
|||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
(2)
|
Initial
caps refer to a fixed percentage specified in the related mortgage
note by
which the related mortgage rate generally will not increase or decrease
on
the first adjustment date more than such fixed
percentage.
|
FICO Scores: |
March
31,
2008
Percentage
|
December 31,
2007
Percentage
|
|||||
650
or less
|
4.1
|
%
|
3.9
|
%
|
|||
651
to 700
|
17.6
|
%
|
17.0
|
%
|
|||
701
to 750
|
32.7
|
%
|
32.4
|
%
|
|||
751
to 800
|
41.4
|
%
|
42.5
|
%
|
|||
801
and over
|
4.2
|
%
|
4.2
|
%
|
|||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
Average
FICO Score
|
737
|
738
|
March
31,
2008
Percentage
|
December 31,
2007
Percentage
|
||||||
50%
or less
|
9.6
|
%
|
9.5
|
%
|
|||
50.01%
- 60.00%
|
8.6
|
%
|
8.9
|
%
|
|||
60.01%
- 70.00%
|
27.1
|
%
|
27.3
|
%
|
|||
70.01%
- 80.00%
|
52.9
|
%
|
52.2
|
%
|
|||
80.01%
and over
|
1.8
|
%
|
2.1
|
%
|
|||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
Average
LTV
|
69.7
|
%
|
69.7
|
%
|
Property Type : |
March
31,
2008
Percentage
|
December 31,
2007
Percentage
|
|||||
Single
Family
|
50.8
|
%
|
51.3
|
%
|
|||
Condominium
|
22.7
|
%
|
22.8
|
%
|
|||
Cooperative
|
10.2
|
%
|
9.8
|
%
|
|||
Planned
Unit Development
|
13.3
|
%
|
13.0
|
%
|
|||
Two
to Four Family
|
3.0
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
|||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
44
Occupancy Status: |
March
31,
2008
Percentage
|
December 31,
2007
Percentage
|
|||||
Primary
|
84.8
|
%
|
84.4
|
%
|
|||
Secondary
|
11.6
|
%
|
12.0
|
%
|
|||
Investor
|
3.6
|
%
|
3.6
|
%
|
|||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
Documentation Type: |
March
31,
2008
Percentage
|
December 31,
2007
Percentage
|
|||||
Full
Documentation
|
71.9
|
%
|
72.0
|
%
|
|||
Stated
Income
|
20.0
|
%
|
19.7
|
%
|
|||
Stated
Income/ Stated Assets
|
6.6
|
%
|
6.8
|
%
|
|||
No
Documentation
|
1.0
|
%
|
1.0
|
%
|
|||
No
Ratio
|
0.5
|
%
|
0.5
|
%
|
|||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
Loan Purpose: |
March
31,
2008
Percentage
|
December 31,
2007
Percentage
|
|||||
Purchase
|
57.4
|
%
|
57.8
|
%
|
|||
Rate
and term refinance
|
15.9
|
%
|
15.9
|
%
|
|||
Cash
out refinance
|
26.7
|
%
|
26.3
|
%
|
|||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
Geographic Distribution: (5% or more in any one state) |
March
31,
2008
Percentage
|
December 31,
2007
Percentage
|
|||||
NY
|
30.5
|
%
|
31.2
|
%
|
|||
MA
|
17.7
|
%
|
17.4
|
%
|
|||
FL
|
8.2
|
%
|
8.3
|
%
|
|||
CA
|
7.0
|
%
|
7.2
|
%
|
|||
NJ
|
5.9
|
%
|
5.7
|
%
|
|||
Other
(less than 5% individually)
|
30.7
|
%
|
30.2
|
%
|
|||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
45
Delinquency
Status -
As of
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had 14 delinquent loans totaling $9.1
million and 14 delinquent loans totaling $8.8 million, respectively, categorized
as mortgage loans held in securitization trusts.
The
following tables set forth delinquent loans in our portfolio as of March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollar amounts in thousands):
March 31, 2008 | ||||||||||
Days Late |
Number
of
Delinquent
Loans
|
Total
Dollar
Amount
|
%
of Loan
Portfolio
|
|||||||
30-60
|
2
|
$
|
1,052
|
0.26
|
%
|
|||||
61-90
|
1
|
$
|
397
|
0.10
|
%
|
|||||
90+
|
11
|
$
|
7,653
|
1.92
|
%
|
|||||
Real estate owned through foreclosure (REO) |
6
|
$ |
4,807
|
1.21
|
% |
December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||
Days Late |
Number
of
Delinquent
Loans
|
Total
Dollar
Amount
|
%
of Loan
Portfolio
|
|||||||
30-60
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
%
|
|||||
61-90
|
2
|
1,859
|
0.43
|
%
|
||||||
90+
|
12
|
6,910
|
1.61
|
%
|
||||||
REO
|
4
|
$
|
4,145
|
0.96
|
%
|
Interest
is recognized as revenue when earned according to the terms of the mortgage
loans and when, in the opinion of management, it is collectible. The accrual
of
interest on loans is discontinued when, in management's opinion, the interest
is
not collectible in the normal course of business, but in no case beyond when
payment on a loan becomes 90 days delinquent. Interest collected on loans for
which accrual has been discontinued is recognized as income upon
receipt.
The
Company had a loan loss reserve for delinquent mortgage loans held in
securitization trusts of $3.1 million as of March 31, 2008 and $1.6 million
as of December 31, 2007.
46
The
following table details loan summary information for loans held in
securitization trust at March 31, 2008 (all amounts in thousands)
Principal
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
amount
of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
loans
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subject
to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Periodic
|
Face
|
Carrying
|
delinquent
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description
|
Interest
Rate %
|
Final
Maturity
|
Payment
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
principal
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property
|
Loan
|
|
Term
|
Prior
|
of
|
of
|
or
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type
|
Balance
|
Count
|
Max
|
Min
|
Avg
|
Min
|
Max
|
(months)
|
Liens
|
Mortgage
|
Mortgage
|
interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Single
|
<=
$100
|
14
|
7.75
|
4.75
|
5.79
|
07/01/33
|
11/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
2,134
|
$
|
947
|
$
|
69
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Family
|
<=$250
|
103
|
9.50
|
4.75
|
5.76
|
09/01/32
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
19,537
|
18,489
|
246
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$500
|
160
|
7.63
|
4.25
|
5.67
|
09/01/32
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
58,600
|
55,912
|
500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$1,000
|
74
|
9.93
|
4.38
|
5.98
|
07/01/33
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
53,496
|
51,689
|
3,417
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
>$1,000
|
37
|
7.75
|
5.00
|
5.79
|
06/01/34
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
65,127
|
64,503
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Summary
|
388
|
9.93
|
4.25
|
5.77
|
09/01/32
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
198,894
|
$
|
191,540
|
$
|
4,232
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2-4
|
<=
$100
|
1
|
6.63
|
6.63
|
6.63
|
02/01/35
|
02/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
80
|
$
|
77
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
FAMILY
|
<=$250
|
7
|
6.75
|
4.38
|
5.73
|
12/01/34
|
11/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
1,365
|
1,288
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$500
|
25
|
7.63
|
5.13
|
5.98
|
09/01/34
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
9,181
|
8,987
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$1,000
|
4
|
7.25
|
5.38
|
6.31
|
10/01/35
|
10/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
3,068
|
3,052
|
517
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
>$1,000
|
1
|
5.63
|
5.63
|
5.63
|
12/01/34
|
08/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
2,600
|
2,600
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Summary
|
38
|
7.63
|
4.38
|
5.97
|
09/01/34
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
16,294
|
$
|
16,004
|
$
|
517
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Condo
|
<=
$100
|
18
|
7.13
|
4.38
|
5.95
|
01/01/35
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
2,648
|
$
|
1,184
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$250
|
97
|
7.88
|
4.50
|
5.75
|
08/01/32
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
18,477
|
17,666
|
230
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$500
|
112
|
8.13
|
4.50
|
5.59
|
09/01/32
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
39,556
|
38,271
|
775
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$1,000
|
41
|
7.88
|
4.50
|
5.54
|
08/01/33
|
11/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
30,413
|
28,164
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
>$1,000
|
16
|
7.25
|
4.63
|
5.60
|
07/01/34
|
09/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
25,728
|
23,322
|
1,149
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Summary
|
284
|
8.13
|
4.38
|
5.66
|
08/01/32
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
116,822
|
$
|
108,607
|
$
|
2,154
|
||||||||||||||||||||
CO-OP
|
<=
$100
|
7
|
7.25
|
4.75
|
5.73
|
09/01/34
|
06/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
986
|
$
|
399
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$250
|
26
|
7.25
|
4.00
|
5.61
|
10/01/34
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
4,829
|
4,522
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$500
|
55
|
7.75
|
4.50
|
5.61
|
08/01/34
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
21,592
|
20,062
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$1,000
|
32
|
6.75
|
4.75
|
5.35
|
11/01/34
|
11/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
23,282
|
22,435
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
>$1,000
|
7
|
6.63
|
4.88
|
5.50
|
11/01/34
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
9,814
|
9,595
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Summary
|
127
|
7.75
|
4.00
|
5.50
|
08/01/34
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
60,503
|
$
|
57,013
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
PUD
|
<=
$100
|
2
|
5.63
|
5.25
|
5.44
|
07/01/35
|
07/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
438
|
$
|
196
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$250
|
29
|
7.75
|
4.63
|
5.84
|
07/01/33
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
5,692
|
5,308
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$500
|
26
|
9.88
|
4.63
|
6.36
|
08/01/32
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
9,426
|
8,878
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$1,000
|
9
|
7.50
|
4.75
|
5.84
|
09/01/33
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
6,196
|
6,111
|
856
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
>$1,000
|
4
|
7.22
|
5.63
|
6.21
|
04/01/34
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
5,233
|
5,218
|
1,343
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Summary
|
70
|
9.88
|
4.63
|
6.04
|
08/01/32
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
26,985
|
$
|
25,711
|
$
|
2,199
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Summary
|
<=
$100
|
42
|
7.75
|
4.38
|
5.85
|
07/01/33
|
12/01/35
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
6,286
|
$
|
2,803
|
$
|
69
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$250
|
262
|
9.50
|
4.00
|
5.75
|
08/01/32
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
49,900
|
47,273
|
476
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$500
|
378
|
9.88
|
4.25
|
5.67
|
08/01/32
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
138,355
|
132,110
|
1,275
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<=$1,000
|
160
|
9.93
|
4.38
|
5.74
|
07/01/33
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
116,455
|
111,451
|
4,790
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
>$1,000
|
65
|
7.75
|
4.63
|
5.74
|
04/01/34
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
108,502
|
105,238
|
2,492
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grand
Total
|
907
|
9.93
|
4.00
|
5.73
|
08/01/32
|
01/01/36
|
360
|
NA
|
$
|
419,498
|
$
|
398,875
|
$
|
9,102
|
The
following table details activity for loans held in securitization trust for
the
three months ended March 31, 2008.
|
Principal
|
Premium
|
Loan
Reserve
|
Net
Carrying Value
|
|||||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2008
|
$
|
429,629
|
$
|
2,733
|
$
|
(1,647
|
)
|
$
|
430,715
|
||||
Additions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
principal
repayments
|
(30,754
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(30,754
|
)
|
|||||||
Reserve
for loan loss
|
-
|
-
|
(1,433
|
)
|
(1,433
|
)
|
|||||||
Amortization
for premium
|
-
|
(205
|
)
|
-
|
(205
|
)
|
|||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2008
|
$
|
398,875
|
$
|
2,528
|
$ |
($3,080
|
)
|
$
|
398,323
|
47
Cash
and cash equivalents -
We had
unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $8.0 million at March 31, 2008 versus
$5.5 million at December 31, 2007.
Restricted
Cash
-
Restricted cash includes amounts held by counterparties as collateral for
hedging instruments, amounts held as collateral for two letters of credit
related to the Company's lease of office space, including its corporate
headquarters, and amounts held in an escrow account to support warranties and
indemnifications related to the sale of the retail mortgage lending platform
to
IndyMac.
Accounts
and accrued interest receivable
-
Accounts and accrued interest receivable includes accrued interest receivable
for investment securities and mortgage loans held in securitization trusts
are
also included.
Prepaid
and other assets
-
Prepaid and other assets totaled $1.8 million as of March 31, 2008. Prepaid
and
other assets consist mainly of $1.3 million of capitalization expenses related
to equity and bond issuance cost. These costs are being amortized into earnings
over time related to the maturity of the underlying issuance. In addition,
$0.3
million of capitalization servicing costs related to our fourth securitization
accounted for as a sale.
Property
and Equipment, Net -
Property
and equipment approximated $0.1 million as of March 31, 2008 and $0.1
million as of December 31, 2007 and have estimated lives ranging from three
to
ten years, and are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation is determined in amounts sufficient to charge the
cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives
using the straight-line method.
Assets
Related to Discontinued Operations:
Mortgage
Loans Held for Sale
-
Mortgage loans that we have originated but do not intend to hold for investment
and are held pending sale to investors are classified as “mortgage loans held
for sale.” We had mortgage loans held for sale (net) of $6.2 million at March
31, 2008 as compared to $8.1 million at December 31, 2007.
Balance
Sheet Analysis - Financing Arrangements
Financing
Arrangements, Portfolio Investments
- As of
March 31, 2008, there were approximately $431.6 million of repurchase
borrowings outstanding. Our repurchase agreements typically have terms of 30
days. As of March 31, 2008, the current weighted average borrowing rate on
these
financing facilities is 3.00%.
Collateralized
Debt Obligations
- As of
March 31, 2008 we have Collateralized Debt Obligations outstanding of
approximately $386.5 million with an average interest rate of
2.98%.
Subordinated
Debentures
- As of
December 31, 2007, we have trust preferred securities outstanding of $45.0
million. The securities are fully guaranteed by the Company with respect to
distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, redemption or repayment.
These securities are classified as subordinated debentures in the liability
section of the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Convertible
Preferred Debentures - As
of
March 31, 2008, there were 1.0 million shares of our Series A Preferred Stock
outstanding, with an aggregate redemption value of $20.0 million. We issued
these shares on January 18, 2008 to JMP Group, Inc. and certain of its
affiliates for an aggregate purchase price of $20.0 million. The Series A
Preferred Stock entitles the holders to receive a cumulative dividend of
10% per
year, subject to an increase to the extent any future quarterly common stock
dividends exceed $0.10 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible
into shares of our common stock based on a conversion price of $4.00 per
share
of common stock, which represents a conversion rate of five shares of common
stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred
Stock
matures on December 31, 2010, at which time any outstanding shares
must be redeemed by us at the $20.00 per share liquidation preference.
Pursuant to SFAS 150, because of this mandatory redemption feature, we classify
these securities as convertible preferred debentures in the liability section
of
our balance sheet.
48
Derivative
Assets and Liabilities
- We
generally hedge only the risk related to changes in the benchmark interest
rate
used in the variable rate index, usually a London Interbank Offered Rate, known
as LIBOR, or a U.S. Treasury rate.
In
order
to reduce these risks, we enter into interest rate swap agreements whereby
we
receive floating rate payments in exchange for fixed rate payments, effectively
converting the borrowing to a fixed rate. We also enter into interest rate
cap
agreements whereby, in exchange for a fee, we are reimbursed for interest paid
in excess of a contractually specified capped rate.
Derivative
financial instruments contain credit risk to the extent that the institutional
counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreements. We minimize
this risk by using multiple counterparties and limiting our counterparties
to
major financial institutions with good credit ratings. In addition, we regularly
monitor the potential risk of loss with any one party resulting from this type
of credit risk. Accordingly, we do not expect any material losses as a result
of
default by other parties.
We
enter
into derivative transactions solely for risk management purposes and not for
speculation. The decision of whether or not a given transaction (or portion
thereof) is hedged is made on a case-by-case basis, based on the risks involved
and other factors as determined by senior management, including the financial
impact on income and asset valuation and the restrictions imposed on REIT
hedging activities by the Internal Revenue Code, among others. In determining
whether to hedge a risk, we may consider whether other assets, liabilities,
firm
commitments and anticipated transactions already offset or reduce the risk.
All
transactions undertaken as a hedge are entered into with a view towards
minimizing the potential for economic losses that could be incurred by us.
Generally, all derivatives entered into are intended to qualify as hedges in
accordance with GAAP, unless specifically precluded under SFAS No. 133. To
this
end, the terms of the hedges are matched closely to the terms of the hedged
items.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, the
Company terminated a total of $517.7 million notional intrest rate swaps
resulting in a realized loss of $4.8 million.
The
following table summarizes the estimated fair value of derivative assets as
of
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
March
31,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||||
Derivative
Assets:
|
|
|
|||||
Interest
rate caps
|
$
|
104
|
$
|
416
|
|||
Total
derivative assets
|
$
|
104
|
$
|
416
|
|||
Derivative
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$
|
1,169
|
$
|
3,517
|
|||
Total
derivative liabilities
|
$
|
1,169
|
$
|
3,517
|
49
Balance
Sheet Analysis - Stockholders' Equity
Stockholders'
equity at March 31, 2008 was $41.1 million and included $14.6 million of net
unrealized losses on available for sale securities and cash flow hedges
presented as accumulated other comprehensive loss.
On
February 21, 2008, the Company completed the issuance and sale of 15.0 million
shares of its common stock in a private placement at a price of $4.00 per
share. This private offering of the Company's common stock generated net
proceeds to the Company of $56.6 million after payment of private placement
fees
and expenses. In connection with the private offering of our common stock,
we entered into the Common Stock Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to
which we were required, among other things, to file with the SEC a
resale shelf registration statement registering for resale the 15.0 million
shares sold in this private offering on or before March 12, 2008 and obtain
listing for our common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market on or before the
effective date of the resale shelf registration statement. In the event we
fail
to satisfy these requirements, we may be subject to payment of liquidated
damages to the investors in the transaction. The Company filed the resale shelf
registration statement on April 4, 2008 and became effective on April 18,
2008. As a result, we incurred a penalty fee (liquidated
damages) of approximately $0.2 million which was paid on May 2,
2008 and remain subject to the penalty until we obtain NASDAQ Stock Market
listing for our common stock.
Prepayment
Experience
The
cumulative prepayment rate (“CPR”) on our mortgage portfolio averaged
approximately 13% during the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared
to
19% for the three months ended March 31, 2007. CPRs on our purchased portfolio
of investment securities averaged approximately 7% while the CPRs on mortgage
loans held for investment or held in our securitization trusts averaged
approximately 24% during the three months ended March 31, 2008. The CPR on
our
mortgage portfolio averaged 15% for the three months ended December
31, 2007. When prepayment expectations over the remaining life of assets
increase, we have to amortize premiums over a shorter time period resulting
in a
reduced yield to maturity on our investment assets. Conversely, if prepayment
expectations decrease, the premium would be amortized over a longer period
resulting in a higher yield to maturity. We monitor our prepayment experience
on
a monthly basis and adjust the amortization of our net premiums
accordingly.
Results
of Operations
Our
results of operations for our mortgage portfolio during a given period typically
reflect the net interest spread earned on our investment portfolio of
residential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. The net interest
spread is impacted by factors such as our cost of financing, the interest rate
our investments are earning and our interest hedging strategies. Furthermore,
the amount of premium or discount paid on purchased portfolio investments and
the prepayment rates on portfolio investments will impact the net interest
spread as such factors will be amortized over the expected term of such
investments.
50
March
31
|
||||||||||
2008
|
2007(1)
|
%
Change
|
||||||||
Total
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Loan
officers
|
—
|
—
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
||||||
Other
employees
|
8
|
35
|
(95.6
|
)%
|
||||||
Total
employees
|
8
|
35
|
(98.3
|
)% | ||||||
Number
of sales locations
|
—
|
—
|
0
|
%
|
(1) The
Company exited the mortgage lending business on March 31, 2007, which
significantly reduced its staffing needs.
Comparative
Net Loss (dollars in thousands)
For the Three Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
%
Change
|
||||||||
Net
interest income (loss)
|
$
|
1,274
|
$
|
(253
|
)
|
603.6
|
%
|
|||
Other
Expense:
|
||||||||||
Loan
losses
|
(1,433
|
)
|
—
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|||||
Loss
on securities and related hedges
|
(19,848
|
)
|
—
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|||||
Total
expenses
|
1,431
|
647
|
121.2
|
%
|
||||||
Loss
for continuing operations
|
(21,438
|
)
|
(900
|
)
|
2,282.0
|
%
|
||||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
180
|
(3,841
|
)
|
104.7
|
%
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
(21,258
|
)
|
(4,741
|
)
|
348.4
|
%
|
||||
Earnings
(loss) per share
|
$
|
(2.10
|
)
|
$
|
(1.31
|
)
|
60.3
|
%
|
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008, we reported a net loss of $21.3 million,
as
compared to a net loss of $4.7 million. The increase in net loss of $16.6
million is primarily due to the $19.8 million realized loss on the sale of
Agency securities and termination of related interest rate hedges and the $1.4
million increase in loan loss reserves incurred during the three months ended
March 31, 2008. These losses were partially offset by a $2.0 million increase
in
net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as compared to net
interest income generated in the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The improvement
in net interest income is primarily a result of improved margins for our
investment portfolio.
51
The
following table sets forth the changes in net interest income, yields earned
on
mortgage loans and securities and rates on financial arrangements for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 (dollar amounts in thousands, except as
noted):
|
For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Average
Balance
|
Amount
|
Yield/
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Amount
|
Yield/
Rate
|
|||||||||||||
|
($
Millions)
|
($
Millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Interest
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Investment
securities and loans held in the securitization
trusts
|
$
|
1,019.5
|
$
|
13,346
|
5.24
|
%
|
$
|
1,017.9
|
$
|
14,214
|
5.59
|
%
|
|||||||
Amortization
of net premium
|
(0.3
|
)
|
(93
|
)
|
(0.04
|
)%
|
4.8
|
(501
|
)
|
(0.23
|
)%
|
||||||||
Interest
income/weighted average
|
$
|
1,019.2
|
$
|
13,253
|
5.20
|
%
|
$
|
1,022.7
|
$
|
13,713
|
5.36
|
%
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities and loans held in the securitization trusts
|
$
|
957.2
|
$
|
10,514
|
4.35
|
%
|
$
|
980.3
|
$
|
13,084
|
5.34
|
%
|
|||||||
Subordinated
debentures
|
45.0
|
959
|
8.43
|
%
|
45.0
|
882
|
7.84
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Convertible
preferred debentures
|
20.0 | 506 | 10% | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Interest
expense/weighted average
|
$
|
1,022.2
|
$
|
11,979
|
4.64
|
%
|
$
|
1,025.3
|
$
|
13,966
|
5.45
|
%
|
|||||||
Net
interest income (expense)/weighted average
|
$
|
1,274
|
0.56
|
%
|
$
|
(253
|
)
|
(0.09
|
)%
|
The
increase in net interest income is due to a more favorable interest rate
environment and also results from the significant
restructuring of our portfolio since
the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
52
The
following table sets forth the net interest spread since inception for our
portfolio of investment securities available for sale, mortgage loans held
for investment and mortgage loans held in securitization trusts, excluding
the costs of our subordinated debentures.
Quarter
Ended
|
Average
Interest
Earning
Assets
($ millions)
|
Weighted
Average
Coupon
|
Weighted
Average
Cash
Yield on
Interest
Earning
Assets
|
Cost
of
Funds
|
Net
Interest
Spread
|
|||||||||||
March
31, 2008
|
$
|
1,019.2
|
5.24
|
%
|
5.20
|
%
|
4.35
|
%
|
0.85
|
%
|
||||||
December
31, 2007
|
$
|
799.2
|
5.90
|
%
|
5.79
|
%
|
5.33
|
%
|
0.46
|
%
|
||||||
September
30, 2007
|
$
|
865.7
|
5.93
|
%
|
5.72
|
%
|
5.38
|
%
|
0.34
|
%
|
||||||
June
30, 2007
|
$
|
948.6
|
5.66
|
%
|
5.55
|
%
|
5.43
|
%
|
0.12
|
%
|
||||||
March
31, 2007
|
$
|
1,022.7
|
5.59
|
%
|
5.36
|
%
|
5.34
|
%
|
0.02
|
%
|
||||||
December
31, 2006
|
$
|
1,111.0
|
5.53
|
%
|
5.35
|
%
|
5.26
|
%
|
0.09
|
%
|
||||||
September
30, 2006
|
$
|
1,287.6
|
5.50
|
%
|
5.28
|
%
|
5.12
|
%
|
0.16
|
%
|
||||||
June
30, 2006
|
$
|
1,217.9
|
5.29
|
%
|
5.08
|
%
|
4.30
|
%
|
0.78
|
%
|
||||||
March
31, 2006
|
$
|
1,478.6
|
4.85
|
%
|
4.75
|
%
|
4.04
|
%
|
0.71
|
%
|
||||||
December
31, 2005
|
$
|
1,499.0
|
4.84
|
%
|
4.43
|
%
|
3.81
|
%
|
0.62
|
%
|
||||||
September
30, 2005
|
$
|
1,494.0
|
4.69
|
%
|
4.08
|
%
|
3.38
|
%
|
0.70
|
%
|
||||||
June
30, 2005
|
$
|
1,590.0
|
4.50
|
%
|
4.06
|
%
|
3.06
|
%
|
1.00
|
%
|
||||||
March
31, 2005
|
$
|
1,447.9
|
4.39
|
%
|
4.01
|
%
|
2.86
|
%
|
1.15
|
%
|
||||||
December
31, 2004
|
$
|
1,325.7
|
4.29
|
%
|
3.84
|
%
|
2.58
|
%
|
1.26
|
%
|
||||||
September
30, 2004
|
$
|
776.5
|
4.04
|
%
|
3.86
|
%
|
2.45
|
%
|
1.41
|
%
|
Comparative
Expenses
For the Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
% Change
|
||||||||
Salaries
and benefits
|
$
|
313
|
$
|
345
|
(9.3
|
)%
|
||||
Marketing
and promotion
|
39
|
23
|
69.6
|
%
|
||||||
Data
processing and communications
|
63
|
37
|
70.3
|
%
|
||||||
Professional
fees
|
352
|
100
|
252.0
|
%
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
75
|
68
|
10.3
|
%
|
||||||
Other
|
589
|
74
|
695.9
|
%
|
||||||
Total
Expenses
|
$
|
1,431
|
$
|
647
|
121.2
|
%
|
The
increase in professional fees of $0.3 million for the three months ended March
31, 2008 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007 is due mainly
to
100% allocation of accounting fees to our continuing operation. Previously
costs were allocated to both our continuing operations and discontinued mortgage
operation. The increase in other expenses of $0.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007 is
due
primarily to $0.1 million in management fees paid to JMPAM pursuant to the
advisory agreement, $0.2 million in penalty fees owed to certain holders of
our common stock pursuant to the Common Stock Registration Rights
Agreement and a change in allocation of certain expenses previously
allocated to the discontinued mortgage lending operation including D&O
insurance premiums of $0.2 million.
53
Discontinued
Operation
For the Three Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
%
Change
|
||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
153
|
$
|
596
|
(74.3
|
)%
|
||||
Gain
on sale of mortgage loans
|
—
|
2,337
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
||||||
Loan
loss
|
(398
|
)
|
(3,161
|
)
|
(87.4
|
)%
|
||||
Brokered
loan fees
|
—
|
2,135
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
||||||
Gain
on sale of retail lending segment
|
—
|
5,160
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
||||||
Other income
|
416
|
27
|
1,440.7
|
%
|
||||||
Total
net revenues
|
$
|
171
|
$
|
7,094
|
(97.6
|
)%
|
||||
|
||||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||
Salaries,
commissions and benefits
|
$
|
50
|
$
|
5,006
|
(99.0
|
)%
|
||||
Brokered
loan expenses
|
—
|
1,723
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
||||||
Occupancy
and equipment
|
(136
|
)
|
1,312
|
(110.4
|
)%
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
77
|
2,894
|
(97.3
|
)%
|
||||||
Total
expenses
|
(9
|
)
|
10,935
|
(100.1
|
)%
|
|||||
Income
(loss) before income tax benefit
|
180
|
(3,841
|
)
|
104.7
|
%
|
|||||
Income
tax benefit
|
—
|
—
|
0
|
%
|
||||||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations - net of
tax
|
$
|
180
|
|
$
|
(3,841
|
)
|
104.7
|
%
|
Substantially
all of the decreases in revenues and expenses in the discontinued operation
are
due to the Company's exit from the mortgage lending business in the first
quarter of 2007.
54
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Since
inception, we have not maintained any relationships with unconsolidated entities
or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating
off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited
purposes. Further, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated
entities nor do we have any commitment or intent to provide funding to any
such
entities. Accordingly, we are not materially exposed to any market, credit,
liquidity or financing risk that could arise if we had engaged in such
relationships.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity
is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including
ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain investments, fund
our
operations, pay dividends to our stockholders and other general business
needs.
We recognize the need to have funds available for our operating businesses
and
meet these potential cash requirements. Our investments and assets generate
liquidity on an ongoing basis through mortgage principal and interest payments,
prepayments and net earnings held prior to payment of dividends. In addition,
depending on market conditions, the sale of investment securities or capital
market transactions may provide additional liquidity. We intend to meet our
liquidity needs through normal operations with the goal of avoiding unplanned
sales of assets or emergency borrowing of funds. However, in March 2008,
news of
potential security liquidations by certain of our competitors negatively
impacted the market value of certain of the investment securities in our
portfolio. In connection with this market disruption and the anticipated
increase in collateral requirements by our lenders as a result of such decrease
in the market value of such securities, we elected to increase our liquidity
by
reducing our leverage through the sale of an aggregate of approximately $592.8
million of Agency MBS, which resulted in an aggregate loss of approximately
$17.1 million, including losses related to the termination of interest rate
swaps. At March 31, 2008, we had cash balances of $8.0 million, $29.9 million
in
unencumbered securities and borrowings of $431.6 million under outstanding
repurchase agreements. At March 31, 2008, we also had longer-term capital
resources, including CDOs outstanding of $386.5 million and subordinated
debt of $45.0 million. In addition, the Company received net proceeds of
$19.6
million and $56.6 million from private offerings of its Series A Preferred
Stock
and common stock, respectively, in January and February 2008. The
Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of our common stock based
on
a conversion price of $4.00 per share of common stock, which represents a
conversion rate of five shares of common stock for each share of Series A
Preferred Stock, and matures on December 31, 2010, at which time
any outstanding shares must be redeemed by us at the $20.00 per share
liquidation preference. As of the date of this report, we believe
our existing cash balances, funds available under our current repurchase
agreements and cash flows from operations will meet our liquidity
requirements for at least the next 12 months, absent any
significant decline in financing availability or significant increase in
cost to obtain financing. However, should further volatility and
deterioration in the broader residential mortgage and MBS markets occur in
the
future, we cannot assure you that our existing sources of liquidity will
be
sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements during the next 12
months.
We
had
outstanding repurchase agreements, a form of collateralized short-term
borrowing, with six different financial institutions as of March 31, 2008.
These
agreements are secured by our mortgage-backed securities and bear interest
rates
that have historically moved in close relationship to LIBOR. Our borrowings
under repurchase agreements are based on the fair value of our mortgage backed
securities portfolio. Interest rate changes can have a negative impact on
the valuation of these securities, reducing the amount we can borrow under
these
agreements. Our repurchase agreements allow the counterparties to
determine a new market value of the collateral to reflect current market
conditions. If a counterparty determines that the value of the collateral
has
decreased, whether as a result of interest rate changes, concern regarding
the
fair value of our mortgage-backed securities portfolio, or other
liquidity concerns in the credit markets, it may initiate a margin call and
require us to either post additional collateral to cover such decrease or
repay
a portion of the outstanding borrowing, on minimal notice. Moreover because
these lines of financing are not committed, the counterparty can call the
loan
at any time. In the event an existing counterparty elected to not reset the
outstanding balance at its maturity into a new repurchase agreement, we would
be
required to repay the outstanding balance with proceeds received from a new
counterparty or to surrender the mortgage-backed securities that serve as
collateral for the outstanding balance. If we are unable to secure financing
from a new counterparty and had to surrender the collateral, we would expect
to
incur a significant loss. External disruptions to credit markets might
also impair access to additional liquidity.
In
addition, in response to the March 2008 market disruption, investors and
financial institutions that lend in the mortgage securities repurchase market,
including the lenders under our repurchase agreements, have further tightened
lending standards in an effort to reduce the leverage of their borrowers.
While
the haircut required by our lenders increased in 2007, primarily on non-Agency
MBS, during March 2008, we have experienced further increases in the amount
of
haircut required to obtain financing for both our Agency MBS and non-Agency
MBS.
As of March 31, 2008, our MBS securities portfolio consisted of approximately
of
$486.0 million of Agency MBS and $26.5 million of non-Agency MBS, which was
financed with approximately $431.6 million of repurchase agreement borrowing
with an average haircut of 9%. Although average haircuts have stabilized in
the second quarter, if the haircuts required by our lenders increase again,
our profitability and liquidity will be materially adversely
affected.
To
finance our MBS investment portfolio, we generally seek to borrow between
eight
and 12 times the amount of our equity, however given the current disruptions
in
the credit markets we have lowered our target leverage to seven to 10 times.
At
March 31, 2008 our leverage ratio for our MBS investment portfolio, which
we
define as our outstanding indebtedness under repurchase agreements divided
by
the sum of total stockholders’ equity and the convertible preferred debentures,
was 7:1. This definition of the leverage ratio is consistent with the manner
in
which the credit providers under our repurchase agreements calculate our
leverage.
55
We
enter
into interest rate swap agreements to extend the maturity of our repurchase
agreements as a mechanism to reduce the interest rate risk of the securities
portfolio. At March 31, 2008, we had $168.1 million in interest rate swaps
outstanding. Should market rates for similar term interest rate swaps drop
below
the rates we have entered into on our interest rate swaps, we will be required
to post additional margin to the swap counterparty, reducing available
liquidity. The weighted average maturity of the swaps was 4.4 years at March
31,
2008.
Our
ability to sell approximately $6.2 million, net of loan loss reserve, of
mortgage loans we own could adversely affect our profitability as any sale
for
less than the current reserved balance would result in a loss. Currently
these
loans are not financed or pledged.
As
it
relates to loans sold previously under certain loan sale agreements by our
discontinued mortgage lending business, we may be required to repurchase
some of
those loans or indemnify the loan purchaser for damages caused by that breach
in
the loan sale agreement. While in the past we complied with the repurchase
demands by repurchasing the loan with cash and reselling it at a loss, thus
reducing our cash position; more recently we have addressed these requests
by
negotiating a net cash settlement based on the actual or assumed loss on
the
loan in lieu of repurchasing the loans. As
of
March 31, 2008 the amount of repurchase requests outstanding was approximately
$4.7 million, against which we had a reserve of approximately $0.7 million.
We
cannot assure you that we will be successful in settling the remaining
repurchase demands on favorable terms, or at all. If we are unable to continue
to resolve our current repurchase demands through negotiated net cash
settlements, our liquidity could be adversely affected. In addition, we may
be
subject to new repurchase requests from investors with whom we have not
settled or with respect to repurchase obligations not covered under the
settlement.
On
March
31, 2008, we paid a $0.50 per share cash dividend, or approximately $0.5
million
in the aggregate, on shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to holders
of record
as of March 31, 2008. The Series A Preferred Stock entitles the holders
to
receive a cumulative dividend of 10% per year (or $0.50 per share per quarter),
subject to increase to the extent any future quarterly common stock dividends
exceed $0.10 per share.
The
Company declared in April 2008 a first quarter cash dividend of $0.06 per
share
on our common stock to holders of record of April 30, 2008. The dividend is
payable on May 15, 2008, and will be paid out of the Company’s current
working capital.This dividend represents the first dividend paid on shares
of
the Company’s common stock since the Board of Directors elected to suspend the
dividend in July 2007. Our board of directors will continue to evaluate
our
dividend policy each quarter and will make adjustments as necessary, based
on a
variety of factors, including, among other things, the need to maintain
our REIT
status, our financial condition, liquidity, earnings projections and business
prospects. Our dividend policy does not constitute an obligation to pay
dividends, which only occurs when the board of directors declares a dividend.
We
intend
to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the various
requirements to maintain our REIT status and to minimize or avoid corporate
income tax and the nondeductible excise tax. However, differences in timing
between the recognition of REIT taxable income and the actual receipt of
cash
could require us to sell assets or to borrow funds on a short-term basis
to meet
the REIT distribution requirements and to avoid corporate income tax and
the
nondeductible excise tax.
Certain
of our assets may generate substantial mismatches between REIT taxable
income
and available cash. These assets could include mortgage-backed securities
we
hold that have been issued at a discount and require the accrual of taxable
income in advance of the receipt of cash. As a result, our REIT taxable
income
may exceed our cash available for distribution and the requirement to distribute
a substantial portion of our net taxable income could cause us to:
·
|
sell
assets in adverse market
conditions;
|
·
|
borrow
on unfavorable terms;
|
·
|
distribute
amounts that would otherwise be invested in assets or repayment
of debt,
in order to comply with the REIT distribution
requirements.
|
56
Inflation
For
the
periods presented herein, inflation has been relatively low and we believe
that
inflation has not had a material effect on our results of operations.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
Market
risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, credit
spreads, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices.
Because we are invested solely in U.S.-dollar denominated instruments, primarily
residential mortgage instruments, and our borrowings are also domestic and
U.S.
dollar denominated, we are not subject to foreign currency exchange, or
commodity and equity price risk; the primary market risk that we are exposed
to
is interest rate risk and its related ancillary risks. Interest rate risk is
highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax
policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations
and
other factors beyond our control. All of our market risk sensitive assets,
liabilities and related derivative positions are for non-trading purposes
only.
Management
recognizes the following primary risks associated with our business and the
industry in which we conduct business:
|
·
|
Interest
rate risk
|
|
·
|
Market
(fair value) risk
|
|
·
|
Credit
spread risk
|
|
·
|
Liquidity
and funding risk
|
|
·
|
Prepayment
risk
|
|
·
|
Credit
risk
|
Interest
Rate Risk
Interest
rates are sensitive to many factors, including governmental, monetary, tax
policies, domestic and international economic conditions, and political or
regulatory matters beyond our control. Changes in interest rates affect the
value of our MBS and ARM loans we manage and hold in our investment portfolio,
the variable-rate borrowings we use to finance our portfolio, and the interest
rate swaps and caps we use to hedge our portfolio. All of our interest rate
related market risk sensitive assets, liabilities and related derivative
positions are managed with a long term perspective and are not for trading
purposes.
Interest
rate risk is measured by the sensitivity of our current and future earnings
to
interest rate volatility, variability of spread relationships, the difference
in
re-pricing intervals between our assets and liabilities and the effect that
interest rates may have on our cash flows, especially the speed at which
prepayments occur on our residential mortgage related assets. Changes in
interest rates can affect our net interest income, which is the difference
between the interest income earned on assets and our interest expense incurred
in connection with our borrowings.
Our
CMO
Floaters have interest rates that adjust monthly, at a margin over LIBOR,
as do
the repurchase agreement liabilities that we use to finance those
Floaters.
Our hybrid
ARM assets reset on various dates that are not matched to the reset dates
on our
repurchase agreements. In general, the repricing of our repurchase
agreements occurs more quickly than the repricing of our assets. First, our
floating rate borrowings may react to changes in interest rates before our
adjustable rate assets because the weighted average next re-pricing dates
on the
related borrowings may have shorter time periods than that of the ARM assets.
Second, interest rates on ARM assets may be limited to a “periodic cap” or
an increase of typically 1% or 2% per adjustment period, while our borrowings
do
not have comparable limitations. Third, our adjustable rate assets typically
lag
changes in the applicable interest rate indices by 45 days due to the notice
period provided to ARM borrowers when the interest rates on their loans are
scheduled to change.
We
seek
to manage interest rate risk in the portfolio by utilizing interest rate
swaps,
caps and Eurodollar futures, with the goal of optimizing the earnings potential
while seeking to maintain long term stable portfolio values. We continually
monitor the duration of our mortgage assets and have a policy to hedge the
financing such that the net duration of the assets, our borrowed funds related
to such assets, and related hedging instruments, are less than one
year.
57
Interest
rates can also affect our net return on hybrid ARM securities and loans net
of
the cost of financing hybrid ARMs. We continually monitor and estimate the
duration of our hybrid ARMs and have a policy to hedge the financing of the
hybrid ARMs such that the net duration of the hybrid ARMs, our borrowed funds
related to such assets, and related hedging instruments are less than one
year.
During a declining interest rate environment, the prepayment of hybrid ARMs
may
accelerate (as borrowers may opt to refinance at a lower rate) causing the
amount of liabilities that have been extended by the use of interest rate
swaps
to increase relative to the amount of hybrid ARMs, possibly resulting in
a
decline in our net return on hybrid ARMs as replacement hybrid ARMs may have
a
lower yield than those being prepaid. Conversely, during an increasing interest
rate environment, hybrid ARMs may prepay slower than expected, requiring
us to
finance a higher amount of hybrid ARMs than originally forecast and at a
time
when interest rates may be higher, resulting in a decline in our net return
on
hybrid ARMs. Our exposure to changes in the prepayment speed of hybrid ARMs
is mitigated by regular monitoring of the outstanding balance of hybrid ARMs,
and adjusting the amounts anticipated to be outstanding in future periods
and,
on a regular basis, making adjustments to the amount of our fixed-rate borrowing
obligations for future periods.
We
utilize a model based risk analysis system to assist in projecting portfolio
performances over a scenario of different interest rates. The model incorporates
shifts in interest rates, changes in prepayments and other factors impacting
the
valuations of our financial securities, including mortgage-backed securities,
repurchase agreements, interest rate swaps and interest rate caps.
Based
on
the results of the model, as of March 31, 2008, changes in interest rates
would
have the following effect on net interest income: (Dollar amounts in
thousands)
Changes
in Net Interest Income
|
||||
Changes
in Interest Rates
|
Changes
in Net Interest Income
|
|||
|
+200
|
$
|
(6,561)
|
|
|
+100
|
$
|
(4,148)
|
|
|
-100
|
$
|
4,453
|
Interest
rate changes may also impact our net book value as our mortgage assets and
related hedge derivatives are marked-to-market each quarter. Generally, as
interest rates increase, the value of our mortgage assets decreases and as
interest rates decrease, the value of such investments will increase. In
general, we would expect however that, over time, decreases in the value
of our
portfolio attributable to interest rate changes will be offset, to the degree
we
are hedged, by increases in value of our interest rate swaps, and vice versa.
However, the relationship between spreads on securities and spreads on swaps
may
vary from time to time, resulting in a net aggregate book value increase
or
decline. Unless there is a material impairment in value that would result
in a
payment not being received on a security or loan, changes in the book value
of
our portfolio will not directly affect our recurring earnings or our ability
to
make a distribution to our stockholders.
58
Market
(Fair Value) Risk
Changes
in interest rates also expose us to market risk that the market (fair) value
on
our assets may decline. For certain of the financial instruments that we
own,
fair values will not be readily available since there are no active trading
markets for these instruments as characterized by current exchanges between
willing parties. Accordingly, fair values can only be derived or estimated
for
these investments using various valuation techniques, such as computing the
present value of estimated future cash flows using discount rates commensurate
with the risks involved. However, the determination of estimated future cash
flows is inherently subjective and imprecise. Minor changes in assumptions
or
estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these derived or
estimated fair values. These estimates and assumptions are indicative of
the
interest rate environments as of March 31, 2008, and do not take into
consideration the effects of subsequent interest rate fluctuations.
We
note
that the values of our investments in mortgage-backed securities and in
derivative instruments, primarily interest rate hedges on our debt, will
be
sensitive to changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, credit
spreads and other market factors. The value of these investments can vary
and
has varied materially from period to period. Historically, the values of
our
mortgage loan portfolio have tended to vary inversely with those of its
derivative instruments.
A
financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based
upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. The three levels of valuation hierarchy established by
SFAS 157 are defined as follows:
Level
1
- inputs
to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical
assets
or liabilities in active markets.
Level
2
- inputs
to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset
or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term
of the
financial instrument.
Level
3
- inputs
to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair
value
measurement.
The
following describes the valuation methodologies used for the Company’s financial
instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification
of
such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
a.
Investment Securities Available for Sale
- Fair
value is generally based on market prices provided by five to seven dealers
who
make markets in these financial instruments. The dealers will incorporate
common
market pricing methods, including a spread measurement to the Treasury curve
or
Interest Rate Swap Cure as well as underlying characteristics of the particular
security including coupon, periodic and life caps, collateral type, rate
reset
period and seasoning or age of the security. If the fair value of a security
is
not reasonably available from a dealer, management estimates the fair value
based on characteristics of the security that the Company receives from the
issuer and based on available market information. Management reviews all
prices
used in determining valuation to ensure they represent current market
conditions. This review includes surveying similar market transactions,
comparisons to interest pricing models as well as offerings of like securities
by dealers. The Company’s investment securities are primarily valued based upon
readily observable market parameters and are classified as Level 2 fair
values.
59
b. Interest
Rate Swaps and Caps
- The
fair value of interest rate swaps and caps are based on using market accepted
financial models as well as dealer quotes. The model utilized readily observable
market parameters, including treasury rates, interest rate swap spreads and
swaption volatility curves. The Company’s interest rate caps and swaps are
classified as Level 2 fair values.
The
following table presents the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair
value as of March 31, 2008, on the condensed consolidated balance sheet by
the
applicable FAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
|
Fair
Value at March 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Investment
securities
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
512,550
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
512,550
|
|||||
Mortgage loans held for sale (net) | — |
—
|
6,209
|
6,209
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate caps
|
—
|
104
|
—
|
104
|
|||||||||
Total
assets carried at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
512,654
|
$
|
6,209
|
$
|
518,863
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,169
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,169
|
|||||
Total
liabilities carried at fair value
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,169
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,169
|
The
fair
value of our mortgage loans held for sale (net) decreased by $0.4 million
during
the period that commenced on January 1, 2008 and ended on March 31, 2008.
This
decrease in fair value of our mortgage loans held for sale (net) is included
in
loan loss in our discontinued operations.
Any
changes to the valuation methodology are reviewed by management to ensure
the
changes are appropriate. There has been no change in valuation
methodology since the previous period. As
markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes
more
transparent, the Company continues to refine its valuation
methodologies. The methods described above may produce a fair value
calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective
of
future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its
valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants,
the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value
of
certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair
value
at the reporting date. The Company uses inputs that are current as of
the measurement date, which may include periods of market dislocation, during
which price transparency may be reduced. This condition could cause
the Company’s financial instruments to be reclassified from Level 2 to Level 3
in the future.
The
market risk management discussion and the amounts estimated from the analysis
that follows are forward-looking statements that assume that certain market
conditions occur. Actual results may differ materially from these projected
results due to changes in our portfolio assets and borrowings mix and due
to
developments in the domestic and global financial and real estate markets.
Developments in the financial markets include the likelihood of changing
interest rates and the relationship of various interest rates and their impact
on our portfolio yield, cost of funds and cash flows. The analytical methods
that we use to assess and mitigate these market risks should not be considered
projections of future events or operating performance.
As
a
financial institution that has only invested in U.S.-dollar denominated
instruments, primarily residential mortgage instruments, and has only borrowed
money in the domestic market, we are not subject to foreign currency exchange
or
commodity price risk. Rather, our market risk exposure is largely due to
interest rate risk. Interest rate risk impacts our interest income, interest
expense and the market value on a large portion of our assets and
liabilities. In managing interest rate risk, we attempt to maximize
earnings and to preserve capital by minimizing the negative impacts of changing
market rates, asset and liability mix, and prepayment activity.
The
table
below presents the sensitivity of the market value changes of our portfolio
using a discounted cash flow simulation model. Application of this method
results in an estimation of the fair market value change of our assets,
liabilities and hedging instruments per 100 basis point (“bp”) shift in interest
rates, as well as this same value expressed in years - a measure commonly
referred to as duration. Positive
portfolio duration indicates that the market value of the total portfolio
will
decline if interest rates rise and increase if interest rates decline. The
closer duration is to zero, the less interest rate changes are expected to
affect earnings.
60
The
use
of hedging instruments is a critical part of our interest rate risk management
strategies, and the effects of these hedging instruments on the market value
of
the portfolio are reflected in the model's output. This analysis also takes
into
consideration the value of options embedded in our mortgage assets including
constraints on the re-pricing of the interest rate of assets resulting from
periodic and lifetime cap features, as well as prepayment options. Assets
and
liabilities that are not interest rate-sensitive such as cash, payment
receivables, prepaid expenses, payables and accrued expenses are
excluded.
Changes
in assumptions including, but not limited to, volatility, mortgage and financing
spreads, prepayment behavior, defaults, as well as the timing and level of
interest rate changes will affect the results of the model. Therefore, actual
results are likely to vary from modeled results.
Market
Value Changes
|
|||||
(Dollar amount in thousands)
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in
Interest
Rates
|
|
Changes
in
Market
Value
|
|
Net
Duration
|
|
+200
|
|
(16,955)
|
|
0.66
years
|
|
+100
|
|
(7,349)
|
|
0.36
years
|
|
Base
|
|
—
|
|
0.32
years
|
|
-100
|
|
5,563
|
|
(0.03)
years
|
It
should
be noted that the model is used as a tool to identify potential risk in a
changing interest rate environment but does not include any changes in portfolio
composition, financing strategies, market spreads or changes in overall market
liquidity.
Based
on
the assumptions used, the model output suggests a very low degree of portfolio
price change given increases in interest rates, which implies that our cash
flow
and earning characteristics should be relatively stable for comparable changes
in interest rates.
Although
market value sensitivity analysis is widely accepted in identifying interest
rate risk, it does not take into consideration changes that may occur such
as,
but not limited to, changes in investment and financing strategies, changes
in
market spreads and changes in business volumes. Accordingly, we make extensive
use of an earnings simulation model to further analyze our level of interest
rate risk.
There
are
a number of key assumptions in our earnings simulation model. These key
assumptions include changes in market conditions that affect interest rates,
the
pricing of ARM products, the availability of investment assets and the
availability and the cost of financing for portfolio assets. Other key
assumptions made in using the simulation model include prepayment speeds
and
management's investment, financing and hedging strategies, and the issuance
of
new equity. We typically run the simulation model under a variety of
hypothetical business scenarios that may include different interest rate
scenarios, different investment strategies, different prepayment possibilities
and other scenarios that provide us with a range of possible earnings outcomes
in order to assess potential interest rate risk. The assumptions used represent
our estimate of the likely effect of changes in interest rates and do not
necessarily reflect actual results. The earnings simulation model takes into
account periodic and lifetime caps embedded in our assets in determining
the
earnings at risk.
Credit
Spread Risk
The
mortgage-backed securities we currently, and will in the future, own are also
subject to spread risk. The majority of these securities will be adjustable-rate
securities that are valued based on a market credit spread to U.S. Treasury
security yields. In other words, their value is dependent on the yield demanded
on such securities by the market based on their credit relative to U.S. Treasury
securities. Excessive supply of such securities combined with reduced demand
will generally cause the market to require a higher yield on such securities,
resulting in the use of a higher or wider spread over the benchmark rate
(usually the applicable U.S. Treasury security yield) to value such securities.
Under such conditions, the value of our securities portfolio would tend to
decline. Conversely, if the spread used to value such securities were to
decrease or tighten, the value of our securities portfolio would tend to
increase. Such changes in the market value of our portfolio may affect our
net
equity, net income or cash flow directly through their impact on unrealized
gains or losses on available-for-sale securities, and therefore our ability
to
realize gains on such securities, or indirectly through their impact on our
ability to borrow and access capital.
Furthermore,
shifts in the U.S. Treasury yield curve, which represents the market's
expectations of future interest rates, would also affect the yield required
on
our securities and therefore their value. These shifts, or a change in spreads,
would have a similar effect on our portfolio, financial position and results
of
operations.
Liquidity
and Funding Risk
Liquidity
is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including
ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, meet margin requirements, fund and
maintain investments, pay dividends to our stockholders and meet other general
business needs. We recognize the need to have funds available for our operating.
It is our policy to have adequate liquidity at all times. We plan to meet
liquidity through normal operations with the goal of avoiding unplanned sales
of
assets or emergency borrowing of funds.
As
it
relates to our investment portfolio, derivative financial instruments we use
also subject us to “margin call” risk based on their market values. Under our
interest rate swaps, we pay a fixed rate to the counterparties while they pay
us
a floating rate. When floating rates are low, on a net basis we pay the
counterparty and visa-versa. In a declining interest rate environment, we would
be subject to additional exposure for cash margin calls due to accelerating
prepayments of mortgage assets. However, the asset side of the balance sheet
should increase in value in a further declining interest rate scenario. Most
of
our interest rate swap agreements provide for a bi-lateral posting of margin,
the effect being that either swap party must post margin, depending on the
change in value of the swap over time. Unlike typical unilateral posting of
margin only in the direction of the swap counterparty, this provides us with
additional flexibility in meeting our liquidity requirements as we can call
margin on our counterparty as swap values increase.
61
Incoming
cash on our mortgage loans and securities is a principal source of cash. The
volume of cash depends on, among other things, interest rates. The volume and
quality of such incoming cash flows can be impacted by severe and immediate
changes in interest rates. If rates increase dramatically, our short-term
funding costs will increase quickly. While many of our Agency securities are
hybrid ARMs, they typically will not reset as quickly as our funding costs
creating a reduction in incoming cash flow. Our derivative financial instruments
are used to mitigate the effect of interest rate volatility.
We
manage
liquidity to ensure that we have the continuing ability to maintain cash flows
that are adequate to meet commitments on a timely and cost-effective basis.
Our
principal sources of liquidity are the repurchase agreement market, the issuance
of CDOs, loan warehouse facilities, principal and interest payments from
portfolio assets and, when market conditions permit, the issuance of common
or
preferred equity.
Prepayment
Risk
When
borrowers repay the principal on their mortgage loans before maturity or faster
than their scheduled amortization, the effect is to shorten the period over
which interest is earned, and therefore, reduce the cash flow and yield on
our
ARM assets. Furthermore, prepayment speeds exceeding or lower than our
reasonable estimates for similar assets, impact the effectiveness of any hedges
we have in place to mitigate financing and/or fair value risk. Generally, when
market interest rates decline, borrowers have a tendency to refinance their
mortgages. The higher the interest rate a borrower currently has on his or
her
mortgage the more incentive he or she has to refinance the mortgage when rates
decline. Additionally, when a borrower has a low loan-to-value ratio, he or
she
is more likely to do a “cash-out” refinance. Each of these factors increases the
chance for higher prepayment speeds during the term of the loan.
We
mitigate prepayment risk by constantly evaluating our ARM portfolio at a range
of reasonable market prepayment speeds observed at the time for assets with
a
similar structure, quality and characteristics. Furthermore, we stress-test
the
portfolio as to prepayment speeds and interest rate risk in order to develop
an
effective hedging strategy.
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008, our mortgage assets paid down at an
approximate average annualized constant paydown rate (“CPR”) of 13%, compared to
19% for the comparable period in 2007 and 15% for the quarter ended December
31,
2007. When prepayment experience increases, we have to amortize our premiums
over a shorter time period, resulting in a reduced yield to maturity on our
ARM
assets. Conversely, if actual prepayment experience decreases, we would amortize
the premium over a longer time period, resulting in a higher yield to maturity.
We monitor our prepayment experience on a monthly basis and adjust the
amortization of the net premium, as appropriate.
Credit
Risk
Credit
risk is the risk that we will not fully collect the principal we have invested
in our MBS or mortgage loans held in securitization trusts. The Company
minimizes the principal risk related to MBS securities by focusing its
investment strategy on Agency MBS as well as the highest rated securities
for
non-Agency securities. As of March 31, 2008 the Company had $512.6 million
in
MBS securities of which 94.8% were Agency MBS and 5.0% were rated AAA.
With
regard to loans included in our securitization trusts, factors such as FICO
score, LTV, debt-to-income ratio, and other borrower and collateral factors
were
evaluated. Credit enhancement features, such as mortgage insurance were
also factored into the credit decision. In some instances, when the borrower
exhibited strong compensating factors, exceptions to the underwriting
guidelines were approved.
Our
mortgage loans held in securitization trusts are concentrated in geographic
markets that are generally supply constrained. We believe that these markets
have less exposure to sudden declines in housing values than those markets
which
have an oversupply of housing.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
- We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit
under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms
of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management timely. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with
the participation of our management, including our Co-Chief Executive Officers
and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of March 31, 2008. Based upon that
evaluation, our management, including our Co-Chief Executive Officers and our
Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of March 31, 2008.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
There
has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during
the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
62
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings.
As
of
March 31, 2008, there have been no material developments or changes to the
information contained in Item 3 (“Legal Proceedings”) of Part I of the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
We
previously disclosed risk factors under "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. In addition to
those
risk factors and the other information included elsewhere in this report,
you
should also carefully consider the risk factors discussed below. The risks
described below and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks
and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we deem to be immaterial
also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
results of operations.
Under
the Common Stock Registration Rights Agreement we entered in connection with
our private placement of common stock in February 2008, we have paid, and
may be required to pay in the future, liquidated damages to the holders of
the
shares of common stock purchased in that private placement if we breach certain
provisions.
Under
the
registration rights agreement we entered in connection with our private
placement of common stock in February 2008, we will pay liquidated damages
if
any of the following events occur: (i) we fail to file a registration
statement covering all of the shares sold in that private
placement
before
the filing deadline; (ii) a registration statement covering all of the shares
sold in that private placement is not declared effective prior to the
effectiveness deadline; (iii) the registration statement is not continuously
kept effective, except during an allowable grace period; (iv) a grace period
exceeds the allowable grace period under the registration rights agreement;
(v)
the shares sold in that private placement may not be sold pursuant to Rule
144 under the Securities Act due to our failure to satisfy the adequate public
information condition of Rule 144(c) under the Securities Act; or (vi) we
fail
to obtain NASDAQ Stock Market listing for our common stock on or before first
date the registration statement covering all of the shares sold in that
private placement is declared effective. The liquidated damages are payable
in
an amount equal to the product of one-thirtieth of (i) 0.5% multiplied by
$4.00
for each day that such events shall occur and be continuing during the first
90
days of such non-compliance, and (ii) 1.0% multiplied by $4.00 for each day
after the 90th
day of
such non-compliance for each share sold in the February 2008 private placement
which is then held by the investors from that offering.
We
filed
a resale shelf registration statement registering for resale the 15.0 million
shares of common stock sold in our February 2008 private placement on April
4,
2008, approximately 23 days after the filing deadline, and paid liquidated
damages of approximately $0.2 million in the aggregate on May 2, 2008 to
the
holders of these shares. The resale shelf registration statement was declared
effective by the SEC on April 18, 2008. Because the market price for our
common
stock is substantially below the minimum listing price required for listing
on
the NASDAQ Stock Market, we have not yet obtained NASDAQ Stock Market listing
for our common stock, and as a result, have been subject to the liquidated
damages penalty since April 19, 2008. Although we intend to request from
these
stockholders a waiver of the damages for this breach and expect to effect
a
one-for-two reverse stock split during May 2008 to satisfy the minimum price
requirement to obtain NASDAQ Stock Market listing, we cannot assure you that
we
will be successful obtaining the waiver or NASDAQ Stock Market listing. In
the
event we fail to obtain NASDAQ Stock Market listing, we will continue to
be
subject to the liquidated damages penalty, the continuance of which could
have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Our
alternative mortgage-related investment strategy to be managed by JMPAM
may be
subject to losses.
Upon
commencement of our alternative mortgage-related investment strategy, we
intend
to invest capital from the Managed Subsidiaries by acquiring equity interests
in
unaffiliated third party entities, or Funds, that acquire or manage a portfolio
of non-Agency MBS, some or all of which may be classified as non-investment
grade. Pursuant to the advisory agreement between JMPAM and us, JMPAM will
manage this alternative mortgage-related investment strategy. Non-Agency
MBS are
generally subject to a higher risk of default than Agency or investment
grade
MBS. In addition, non-Agency
MBS have been more susceptible to downgrades from the Ratings Agencies
due to a
number of factors, including greater than expected delinquencies, defaults
or
credit losses, any of which may reduce the market value of such securities.
As
a
result, we may invest in Funds that overestimate the potential credit worthiness
of the mortgage loans underlying the non-Agency MBS they manage or seek
to
invest in. Greater
than expected delinquencies, defaults or credit losses
on such
securities may result in substantial losses to and possible liquidation
of the
Funds that manage and invest in such securities. Because we intend our
alternative mortgage-related investments to take the form of an equity
investment in these Funds, in the event one or more of these Funds becomes
distressed, thereby resulting in a liquidation of such Fund’s assets, holders of
debt and senior preferred securities and lenders with respect to other
borrowings of such Fund will receive a distribution of the Fund’s available
assets prior to us. If one or more of the Funds in which we invest incur
significant losses, we may lose some or all of our investment in these
Funds and
this could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition
and ability to make distributions to our
stockholders.
Item
6. Exhibits
63
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
NEW
YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 14, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/ David
A. Akre
|
|
David
A. Akre
Co-Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 14, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Steven R. Mumma
|
|
Steven
R. Mumma
Chief
Financial Officer
|
64
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
3.1(a)
|
|
Articles
of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.01 to our Registration Statement on Form S-11/A filed
on
June 18, 2004 (Registration No. 333-111668)).
|
|
|
|
3.1(b)
|
|
Articles
of Amendment of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1
to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 4,
2007.)
|
|
|
|
3.1(c)
|
|
Articles
of Amendment of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.2
to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 4,
2007.)
|
|
|
|
3.2(a)
|
|
Bylaws
of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.02 to our
Registration Statement on Form S-11/ A filed on June 18, 2004
(Registration No. 333-111668)).
|
|
|
|
3.2(b)
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Bylaws of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.2(b)
to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16,
2006)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form
of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.01 to
our Registration Statement on Form S-11/ A filed on June 18, 2004
(Registration No. 333-111668)).
|
|
|
|
4.2(a)
|
|
Junior
Subordinated Indenture between The New York Mortgage Company, LLC
and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee, dated
September 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 6,
2005).
|
|
|
|
4.2(b)
|
|
Amended
and Restated Trust Agreement among The New York Mortgage Company,
LLC,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Chase Bank USA, National
Association and the Administrative Trustees named therein, dated
September 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 6,
2005).
|
4.3(a)
|
Articles
Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences
of
Series A Cumulative Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock of the
Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2008).
|
|
|
|
|
4.3(b)
|
Form
of Series A Cumulative Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on January 25,
2008).
|
10.1
|
Amendment
No. 5 to Stock Purchase Agreement, by and among New York Mortgage
Trust,
Inc. and the Investors listed on Schedule I to the Stock Purchase
Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2008 (Incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 10.1(b) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
January 25, 2008).
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, by and among New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.
and the
Investors listed on Schedule I to the Stock Purchase Agreement,
dated as
of January 18, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25,
2008).
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
Advisory
Agreement, by and among New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., Hypotheca
Capital,
LLC, New York Mortgage Funding, LLC and JMP Asset Management
LLC, dated as
of January 18, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25,
2008).
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
Employment
Agreement, by and between New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. and David
A. Akre,
dated as of January 18, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25,
2008).
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
Employment
Agreement, by and between New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. and Steven
R.
Mumma, dated as of January 18, 2008 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25,
2008).
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
Form
of Purchase Agreement, by and among New York Mortgage Trust,
Inc. and the
Investors listed on Schedule A thereto, dated as of February 14, 2008
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on February 19, 2008).
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
Form
of Registration Rights Agreement, by and among New York Mortgage
Trust,
Inc. and the Investors listed on Schedule A thereto, dated as of
February 14, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 19,
2008).
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Co-Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of Co-Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.*
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.*
|
*
|
Filed
herewith
|
65