NEXTGEN HEALTHCARE, INC. - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 001-12537
QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
95-2888568 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
18111 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700, Irvine, California (Address of principal executive offices) |
92612 (Zip Code) |
(949) 255-2600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value | NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes
o No
þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
o No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§
229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of
September 30, 2010: $1,276,253,000 (based on the closing sales price of the Registrants common
stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date of $66.31 per share).*
The Registrant has no non-voting common equity.
The number of outstanding shares of the Registrants common stock as of May 23, 2011 was
29,179,390 shares.
* For purposes of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in addition to those shareholders which fall within the definition of affiliates under Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, holders of ten percent or more of the Registrants common stock are deemed to be affiliates for purposes of this Report. |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.
QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2011 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
2011 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Item | Page | |||||||
PART I |
||||||||
3 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
PART II |
||||||||
21 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
PART III |
||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
PART IV |
||||||||
48 | ||||||||
53 | ||||||||
EX-21 | ||||||||
EX-23.1 | ||||||||
EX-23.2 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
2
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this Report), the Annual Report to
Shareholders in which this Report is made a part, other reports and proxy statements filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission), communications to shareholders, press releases
and oral statements made by our representatives that are not historical in nature, or that state
our or managements intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions of the future, may
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements can often be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as could, should, will, will be,
will lead, will assist, intended, continue, believe, may, expect, hope,
anticipate, goal, forecast, plan, or estimate or variations thereof or similar
expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance.
Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. It is important to note
that any such performance and actual results, financial condition or business, could differ
materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the risk factors discussed in Item
1A of this Report as well as factors discussed elsewhere in this and other reports and documents we
file with the Commission. Other unforeseen factors not identified herein could also have such an
effect. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect
changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in future operating results,
financial condition or business over time unless required by law. Interested persons are urged to
review the risks described under Item 1A. Risk Factors and in Item 7. Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as in our other public
disclosures and filings with the Commission.
PART I
ITEM 1. | BUSINESS |
Company Overview
Quality Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries operates as four business divisions and is comprised of: (i) the QSI Dental Division; (ii) the
NextGen Division, which consists of NextGen Healthcare Information Systems, Inc.(NextGen); (iii)
the Inpatient Solutions Division, which consists of NextGen Inpatient Solutions, LLC (NextGen IS
f/k/a Sphere) and Opus Healthcare Solutions, LLC (Opus); (iv) the Practice Solutions Division,
which consists of Lackland Acquisition II, LLC dba Healthcare Strategic Initiatives (HSI) and
Practice Management Partners, Inc. (PMP) and (v) Quality Systems India Healthcare Private Limited
(QSIH) (collectively, the Company, we, our, or us). The Company develops and markets
healthcare information systems that automate certain aspects of physician, inpatient and dental
practices, networks of practices such as physician hospital organizations (PHOs) and management
service organizations (MSOs), ambulatory care centers, community health centers, Federal
Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) and medical and dental schools. The Company also provides
inpatient electronic health records (EHR) and financial solutions for community hospitals as well
as revenue cycle management (RCM) services through the Practice Solutions Division.
The Company, a California corporation formed in 1974, was founded with an early focus on providing
information systems to dental group practices. In the mid-1980s, we capitalized on the increasing
focus on medical cost containment and further expanded our information processing systems to serve
the medical market. In the mid-1990s, we made two acquisitions that accelerated our penetration
of the medical market. These two acquisitions formed the basis for the NextGen Division. Today,
we serve the physician, inpatient and dental markets through our QSI Dental Division, NextGen
Division, Inpatient Solutions Division and Practice Solutions Division.
The Divisions operate largely as stand-alone operations, with each Division maintaining its own
distinct product lines, product platforms, development, implementation and support teams, sales
staffing and branding. The Divisions share the resources of our corporate office, which includes
a variety of accounting and other administrative functions. Additionally, there are a small but
growing number of clients who are simultaneously utilizing software or services from more than one
of our Divisions.
The QSI Dental and NextGen Divisions develop and market practice management software that is
designed to automate and streamline a number of the administrative functions required for operating
a medical or dental practice. Examples of practice management software functions include
scheduling and billing capabilities, and it is important to note that in both the medical and
dental environments, practice management software systems have already been implemented by the vast
majority of practices. Therefore, we actively compete for the replacement market. In addition,
the QSI Dental and NextGen Divisions develop and market software that automate patient records in
both a practice and hospital setting. Therefore, we are typically competing to replace paper-based
patient record alternatives as opposed to replacing previously purchased systems.
With the acquisition of NextGen IS in 2009, the Inpatient Solutions Division entered the market for
financial information systems for small hospitals. Therefore, since 2009, the Inpatient Solutions
Division has also been developing and marketing an equivalent practice management software product
for the small hospital market, which performs administrative functions required for operating a
small hospital.
In January 2011, QSIH was formed to function as the Companys India-based captive to offshore
technology application development and business processing services.
3
Table of Contents
We continue to pursue product and service enhancement initiatives within each Division. The
majority of such expenditures are currently targeted to the NextGen Division product line and
client base.
The following table breaks down our reported segment revenue and segment revenue growth by division
for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009:
Segment Revenue Breakdown | Segment Revenue Growth | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
5.7 | % | 5.9 | % | 6.5 | % | 16.6 | % | 8.1 | % | (1.2 | )% | ||||||||||||
NextGen Division |
75.3 | % | 78.3 | % | 83.0 | % | 16.5 | % | 12.1 | % | 19.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division (1) |
5.1 | % | 1.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 519.1 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division (2) |
13.9 | % | 14.8 | % | 10.5 | % | 13.7 | % | 67.5 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||
Consolidated |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 21.1 | % | 18.9 | % | 31.6 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | Inpatient Solutions Division consists of two acquisitions, Opus and NextGen IS, acquired in February 2010 and August 2009, respectively. | |
(2) | Practice Solutions Division consists of two acquisitions, HSI and PMP, acquired in May 2008 and October 2008, respectively. |
QSI Dental Business Unit. The QSI Dental Business, co-located with our corporate headquarters
in Irvine, California, currently focuses on developing, marketing and supporting software suites
sold to dental organizations located throughout the US. In addition, the Business Unit supports a
growing number of organizations utilizing its Software as a Service (SaaS) model-based NextDDS
financial and clinical software and certain number of medical clients that utilize the Divisions
UNIX®-based
medical practice management software product.
The QSI Dental Business Units practice management software suite utilizes a UNIX® operating
system. Its Clinical Product Suite (CPS) utilizes the Windows operating system and can be fully
integrated with the practice management software offered from each of our Business Units. CPS
incorporates a wide range of clinical tools including, but not limited to, periodontal charting and
digital imaging of X-ray and inter-oral camera images as part of the electronic patient record.
The Business Unit develops, markets and manages our Dental EDI/connectivity applications including
our QSInet Application Service Provider (ASP).
In July 2009, we licensed source code that allows us to deliver hosted, Web-based SaaS model
practice management and clinical software solutions to the dental industry. This new software
solution (NextDDS) is being marketed primarily to the multi-location dental group practice
market in which the Business Unit has historically been a dominant player. NextDDS brings the QSI
Dental Business Unit to the forefront of the emergence of Internet-based applications and cloud
computing and represents a significant growth opportunity for the Business Unit to sell both to its
existing client base as well as new clients.
NextGen Division. The NextGen Division, with headquarters in Horsham, Pennsylvania and significant
locations in Atlanta, Georgia and Austin, Texas, provides integrated clinical, financial and
connectivity solutions for ambulatory and dental provider organizations.
The NextGen Divisions major product categories include the NextGen ambulatory product suite
and NextGen Community Connectivity.
The NextGen Ambulatory product suite streamlines patient care with standardized, real-time clinical
and administrative workflows within a physicians practice, and consists of:
| NextGen Electronic Health Records (NextGenehr) to ensure complete, accurate documentation to manage patient care electronically and to improve clinical processes and patient outcomes with electronic charting at the point of care; | ||
| NextGen Practice Management (NextGenpm) to automate business processes, from front-end scheduling to back-end collections and financial and administrative processes for increased performance and efficiencies; | ||
| NextGen Dashboard, which allows providers to view patient data in a visually rich graphical format. Using bar charts, pie charts, gauges and more, the system displays information at the practice or single provider level; | ||
| NextGen Mobile improves patient care through anytime, anywhere access of patient data. In addition, Mobile has the capability to increase revenue by easily capturing charges at the point of care resulting in potential reduction of medical liability through better documentation of out-of-office actions; and | ||
| NextGen NextPen is a revolutionary digital pen that quickly captures data into NextGen Ambulatory EHR. NextPen captures structured data and graphic drawings as part of the patient record without scanning or transcription. This technology requires no learning curve for adoption. |
4
Table of Contents
NextGen Community Connectivity consists of:
| NextGen Health Information Exchange (HIE), formerly Community Health Solution, to exchange patient data securely with community healthcare organizations; | ||
| NextGen Patient Portal (NextMD.com) to communicate with patients online and import information directly into NextGenehr; and | ||
| NextGen Health Quality Measures (HQM) to allow seamless quality measurement and reporting for practice and physician performance initiatives. |
The NextGen Division products utilize Microsoft Windows technology and can operate in a
client-server environment as well as via private intranet, the Internet, or in an ASP environment.
Services provided by the NextGen Division include:
| EDI services that are intended to automate the entire patient statement process, reducing labor and printing costs associated with producing statements in house. In addition, NextGen EDI works with the most innovative clearinghouses to transform electronic claims submissions into payments; | ||
| Hosting services that allow practices seeking the benefits of IT automation but not the maintenance of in-house hardware and networking; | ||
| NextGuard Data Protection services that provide an off-site, data archiving, restoration and disaster recovery preparedness solution for practices to protect clinical and financial data; | ||
| Consulting services, such as strategic governance models and operational transformation, technical consulting such as data conversions or interface development, that also allow practices to build custom add-on features; Physician Consulting Resources, services that allow practices to consult with the NextGen Divisions physician team; and eHealth consulting services that assist in connecting communities of practice for data sharing. |
Practice Solutions Division. The Practice Solutions Division, with locations in St. Louis,
Missouri and Hunt Valley, Maryland, focuses primarily on providing physician practices with RCM
services, primarily billing and collection services for medical practices. This Division combines
a Web-delivered SaaS model and the NextGenpm software platform to execute its service
offerings. Execution of the plan to transition our client base onto the NextGen platform is under
execution. The Practice Solutions Division provides technology solutions and consulting services
to cover the full spectrum of providers revenue cycle needs from patient access through claims
denials.
Practice Solutions Division revenue growth in fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 was positively
impacted by the acquisitions of HSI and PMP in May 2008 and October 2008, respectively. Growth
subsequent to fiscal year 2009 was created primarily by cross selling RCM services to NextGen
clients.
On May 20, 2008, we acquired St. Louis-based HSI, a full-service healthcare RCM company. HSI
operates under the umbrella of the Companys Practice Solutions Division. Founded in 1996, HSI
provides RCM services to providers including health systems, hospitals and physicians in private
practice with an in-house team consisting of specialists in medical billing, coding and compliance,
payor credentialing and information technology.
On October 28, 2008, we acquired Maryland-based PMP, a full-service healthcare RCM company. This
acquisition is also part of our growth strategy for our Practice Solutions Division. a
full-service healthcare RCM company. Similar to HSI, PMP operates under the umbrella of the
Companys Practice Solutions Division. Founded in 2001, PMP provides physician billing and
technology management services to healthcare providers, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region.
Inpatient Solutions Division. The Inpatient Solutions Division, with its primary location in
Austin, Texas, provides integrated clinical, financial and connectivity solutions for rural and
community hospitals.
On August 12, 2009, we acquired NextGen IS, a provider of financial information systems to the
small hospital inpatient market. This acquisition, along with our acquisition of Opus, is part of
our strategy to expand into the small hospital market and to add new clients by taking advantage of
cross-selling opportunities between the ambulatory and inpatient markets.
5
Table of Contents
On February 10, 2010, we acquired Opus, a provider of clinical information systems to the small
hospital inpatient market. Founded in 1987 and headquartered in Austin, Texas, Opus delivers
Web-based clinical solutions to hospital systems and integrated health networks nationwide. This
acquisition complements and will be integrated with the assets and operations of NextGen IS. Both
companies are established developers of software and services for the inpatient market and will
operate under the Companys Inpatient Solutions Division.
The Inpatient Solutions Division products that deliver secure, highly adaptable and easy to use
applications to patient centered hospitals and health systems consist of:
| NextGen Clinicals, which resides on an advanced truly active web 2.0 platform and is designed to initiate widespread work efficiency and communication, reduce errors and time-to-chart, and improve care; and | ||
| NextGen Financials, which is a financial and administrative system that helps hospitals significantly improve the smart operations and financial and regulatory management of their facilities. |
Industry Background
The turbulence in the worldwide economy has impacted almost all industries. While healthcare is
not immune to economic cycles, we believe it is more resilient than most segments of the economy.
The impact of the current economic conditions on our existing and prospective clients has been
mixed. We continue to see organizations that are doing fairly well operationally; however, some
organizations with a large dependency on Medicaid populations are being impacted by the challenging
financial condition of the many state governments in whose jurisdictions they conduct business. A
positive factor for U.S. healthcare is the fact that the Obama Administration is pursuing broad
healthcare reform aimed at improving issues surrounding healthcare. The American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act (ARRA), which became law on February 17, 2009, includes more than $20 billion to
help healthcare organizations modernize operations through the acquisition of health care
information technology. The Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT®),
a non-profit organization recognized by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology as an approved Authorized Testing and Certification Body, announced that our
EHR solution was certified as a Complete EHR and 2011/2012 compliant during the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, which comes off the heels of the Stage 1 Meaningful Use definition criteria
under the ARRA that was announced in July 2010. With the lifting of the many Meaningful Use
definition uncertainties, which has impacted software revenue, we believe we are well positioned to
aid physicians and hospitals with their EHR decisions as they prepare to make incentive-based
purchases.
Moreover, to compete in the continually changing healthcare environment, providers are increasingly
using technology to help maximize the efficiency of their business practices, to assist in
enhancing patient care, and to maintain the privacy of patient information.
As the reimbursement environment continues to evolve, more healthcare providers enter into
contracts, often with multiple entities, which define the terms under which care is administered
and paid. The diversity of payor organizations, as well as additional government regulation and
changes in reimbursement models, have greatly increased the complexity of pricing, billing,
reimbursement and records management for medical and dental practices. To operate effectively,
healthcare provider organizations must efficiently manage patient care and other information and
workflow processes, which increasingly extend across multiple locations, disparate systems, and
business entities.
In response, healthcare provider organizations have placed increasing demands on their information
systems. Initially, these information systems automated financial and administrative functions.
As it became necessary to manage patient flow processes, the need arose to integrate back-office
data with such clinical information as patient test results and office visits. We believe
information systems must facilitate management of patient information incorporating administrative,
financial and clinical information from multiple entities. In addition, large healthcare
organizations increasingly require information systems that can deliver high performance in
environments with multiple concurrent computer users.
Many existing healthcare information systems were designed for limited administrative tasks such as
billing and scheduling and can neither accommodate multiple computing environments nor operate
effectively across multiple locations and entities. We believe that practices that leverage
technology to more efficiently handle patient clinical data as well as administrative, financial
and other practice management data will be best able to enhance patient flow, pursue cost
efficiencies and improve quality of care. As healthcare organizations transition to new computer
platforms and newer technologies, we believe such organizations will be migrating toward the
implementation of enterprise-wide, patient-centric computing systems embedded with automated
clinical patient records.
Our Strategy
Our strategy is, at present, to focus on providing software and services to physician practices,
dental practices, hospitals, health centers, other healthcare providers and to expand service
offerings to include the payor market and consumer market segments. Among the key elements of this
strategy are:
| Continue development and enhancement of select software solutions in target markets; | ||
| Continue investments in our infrastructure including, but not limited to, sales, marketing, implementation, consulting and support; | ||
| Continue investment in product development, which includes developing a new integrated inpatient and outpatient, web-based software platform; | ||
| Continue efforts to make infrastructure investments within an overall context of maintaining reasonable expense discipline; |
6
Table of Contents
| Addition of new clients through maintaining and expanding sales, marketing and product development activities; | ||
| Expand our relationship with existing clients through delivery of innovative new and complementary products and services; and | ||
| Continue our gold standard commitment of service in support of our client satisfaction programs. |
While these are the key elements of our current strategy, there can be no guarantee that our
strategy will not change, or that we will succeed in achieving these goals individually or
collectively.
Products and Services
In response to the growing need for more comprehensive, cost-effective healthcare information
solutions for medical practices, dental practices, hospitals, health centers and other healthcare
providers, our systems and services provide our clients with the ability to redesign patient care
and other workflow processes while improving productivity through facilitation of managed access to
patient information. Utilizing our proprietary software in combination with third party hardware
and software solutions, our products enable the integration of a variety of administrative clinical
and financial operations. Leveraging more than 30 years of experience in the healthcare
information services industry, we believe we continue to add value by providing our clients with
sophisticated, full-featured software systems along with comprehensive systems implementation,
training, consultation, maintenance and support services. Any single transaction may or may not
include software, hardware or services.
NextGen Ambulatory Practice Management Systems. Our products consist primarily of proprietary
healthcare software applications together with third party hardware and other non-industry specific
software. The systems range in capacity from one to thousands of users, allowing us to address the
needs of both small and large organizations. The systems are modular in design and may be expanded
to accommodate changing client requirements. We offer both standard licenses and SaaS arrangements
in our software offerings; although to date, SaaS arrangements have represented less than 5% of our
arrangements.
NextGenpm is the NextGen Divisions practice management offering.
NextGenpm
has been developed with a functional graphical user interface (GUI) certified for use with
Windows 2000 and Windows XP operating systems. The product leverages a relational database
(Microsoft SQL Server) with support on both 32 and 64 bit enterprise servers. NextGenpm
is a scalable, multi-module solution that includes a master patient index, enterprise-wide
appointment scheduling with referral tracking, clinical support and centralized or decentralized
patient financial management based on either a managed care or fee-for-service model. The
NextGenpm product is a highly configurable, cost-effective proven solution that enables
the effective management of both single and multi-practice settings.
NextGen Ambulatory Clinical Systems. The NextGen Division provides clinical software applications
that are complementary to, and are integrated with, our medical practice management offerings and
interface with many of the other leading practice management software systems on the market. The
applications incorporated into our practice management solutions and others such as scheduling,
eligibility, billing and claims processing are augmented by clinical information captured by
NextGenehr, including services rendered, clinical documentation and diagnoses used for
billing purposes. We believe that we currently provide a comprehensive information management
solution for the medical marketplace.
NextGenehr was developed with client-server architecture, GUI and utilizes Microsoft
Windows 2000, Windows NT or Windows XP on each workstation and either Windows 2000, Windows NT,
Windows XP or UNIX on the database server. NextGenehr maintains data using industry
standard relational database engines such as Microsoft SQL Server or Oracle. The system is
scalable from one to thousands of workstations. NextGenehr stores and maintains
clinical data including:
| Data captured using user-customizable input templates | ||
| Scanned or electronically acquired images, including X-rays and photographs; | ||
| Data electronically acquired through interfaces with clinical instruments or external systems; | ||
| Other records, documents or notes, including electronically captured handwriting and annotations; and | ||
| Digital voice recordings. |
NextGenehr also offers a workflow module, prescription management, automatic document
and letter generation, patient education, referral tracking, interfaces to billing and lab systems,
physician alerts and reminders and powerful reporting and data analysis tools.
QSI Dental Division Practice Management and Clinical Systems. In fiscal year 2010, we began selling
a hosted SaaS practice management and clinical software solutions to the dental industry. The
software solution is marketed primarily to the multi-location dental group practice market for
which the Division has historically been a dominate player. This new software solution brings the
QSI Dental Division to the forefront of the emergence of internet based applications and cloud
computing and represents a significant growth opportunity for us to sell both to our existing
client base as well as new clients.
In addition to the SaaS practice management offering, the QSI Dental Division also sells a
character-based practice management system using the IBM RS6000 central processing unit and IBMS
AIX version of the UNIX operating system platform. The hardware components, as well as the
requisite operating system licenses, are purchased from manufacturers or distributors of those
components. We configure and test the hardware components and incorporate our software and other
third party packages into completed systems. We continually evaluate third party hardware
components with a view toward utilizing hardware that is functional, reliable and cost-effective.
7
Table of Contents
In addition to the SaaS clinical offering, our dental charting software system, the CPS is a
comprehensive solution designed specifically for the dental group practice environment. CPS
integrates the dental practice management product with a computer-based clinical information system
that incorporates a wide range of clinical tools, including electronic charting of dental
procedures, treatment plans, existing conditions, periodontal charting via light-pen,
voice-activation, or keyboard entry for full periodontal examinations and PSR scoring. In
addition, digital imaging of X-ray and intra-oral camera images, computer-based patient education
modules are viewable chair-side to enhance case presentation, full access to patient information,
treatment plans and insurance plans via a fully integrated interface with our dental practice
management product, supported by document and image scanning for digital storage and linkage to the
electronic patient record.
The result is a comprehensive clinical information management system that helps practices save
time, reduce costs, improve case presentation and enhance the delivery of dental services and
quality of care. Clinical information is managed and maintained electronically thus forming an
electronic patient record that allows for the implementation of the chartless office.
CPS incorporates Windows-based client-server technology consisting of one or more file servers
together with any combination of one or more desktop, laptop, or pen-based PC workstations. The
file server(s) used in connection with CPS utilize(s) Windows 2000 or Windows 2003 operating system
and the hardware is typically an Intel-based single or multi-processor platform. Based on the
server configuration chosen, CPS is scalable from one to hundreds of workstations. The hardware
components, including the requisite operating system licenses, are purchased from third party
manufacturers or distributors either directly by the client or by us for resale to the customer.
Inpatient Solutions. Inpatient solutions includes both clinical and financial applications to
provide value based solutions for rural and community hospitals to improve patient safety, automate
order entry and facilitate real-time communication of patient information throughout the hospital.
Inpatient solutions are highly scalable, secure and easy to use with a Web 2.0 based clinical
component that leverages full cloud computing capabilities.
Revenue Cycle Management Services. Our Practice Solutions Division offers RCM services to
physicians. Our RCM service automates and manages billing-related functions for physician
practices to help manage reimbursement quickly and efficiently. RCM services generally include:
| Electronic claims submission service that submits Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) compliant insurance claims electronically to insurance payors; | ||
| Electronic remittance and payment posting service that uses NextGen Document Management system to link an image of each explanation of benefit (EOB) to the corresponding encounter at the time of payment posting to minimizes the need for storage of paper EOBs; and | ||
| Accounts receivable follow-up methodology that allows practices to establish parameters, adjustment rules and standards for account elevation. |
Electronic Data Interchange. We make available EDI capabilities and connectivity services to our
clients. The EDI/connectivity capabilities encompass direct interfaces between our products and
external third party systems, as well as transaction-based services. EDI products are intended to
automate a number of manual, often paper-based or telephony intensive communications between
patients and/or providers and/or payors. Two of the more common EDI services are forwarding
insurance claims electronically from providers to payers and assisting practices with issuing
statements to patients. Most client practices utilize at least some of these services from us or
one of our competitors. Other EDI/connectivity services are used more sporadically by client
practices. We typically compete to displace incumbent vendors for claims and statements accounts
and attempt to increase usage of other elements in our EDI/connectivity product line. In general,
EDI services are only sold to those accounts utilizing software from either the QSI Dental or
NextGen Divisions. Services include:
| Electronic claims submission through our relationships with a number of payors and national claims clearinghouses; | ||
| Electronic patient statement processing, appointment reminder cards and calls, recall cards, patient letters and other correspondence; | ||
| Electronic insurance eligibility verification; and | ||
| Electronic posting of remittances from insurance carriers into the accounts receivable application. |
Community Connectivity. The NextGen Division also markets NextGen HIE to facilitate
cross-enterprise data sharing, enabling individual medical practices in a given community to
selectively share critical data, such as demographics, referrals, medications lists, allergies,
diagnoses, lab results, histories and more. This is accomplished through a secure, community-wide
data repository that links health care providers, whether they have the NextGenehs
system, another compatible electronic medical records system, or no electronic medical records
system, together with hospitals, payors, labs and other entities. The product is designed to
facilitate a Regional Health Information Organization (RHIO). The result is that for every
health care encounter in the community, a patient-centric and complete record is accessible for the
provider. The availability, accuracy and completeness of information plus the elimination of
duplicate data entry can lead to significantly improved patient safety, enhanced decision making
capabilities, time efficiencies and cost savings. Our NextGen Division maintains an Internet-based
patient health portal, NextGen Patient Portal. NextMD.com is the URL for our vertical portal for
the healthcare industry, linking patients with their physicians, while providing a centralized
source of health-oriented information for both consumers and medical professionals. Patients whose
physicians are linked to the portal are able to request appointments, send appointment changes or
cancellations, receive test results on-line, request prescription refills, view and/or pay their
statements, and communicate with their physicians, all in a secure, on-line environment. Our
NextGen suite of information systems are or can be linked to NextMD.com, integrating a number of
these features with physicians existing systems.
8
Table of Contents
Sales and Marketing
We sell and market our products nationwide primarily through a direct sales force. The efforts of
the direct sales force are augmented by a small number of reseller relationships established by us.
Software license sales to resellers represented less than 10% of total revenue for the years ended
March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Our direct sales force typically makes presentations to potential clients by demonstrating the
system and our capabilities on the prospective clients premises. Sales efforts aimed at smaller
practices can be performed on the prospective clients premises, or remotely via telephone or
Internet-based presentations. Our sales and marketing employees identify prospective clients
through a variety of means, including referrals from existing clients, industry consultants,
contacts at professional society meetings, trade shows and seminars, trade journal advertising,
direct mail advertising and telemarketing.
Our sales cycle can vary significantly and typically ranges from six to twenty-four months from
initial contact to contract execution. Software licenses are normally delivered to a client almost
immediately upon receipt of an order. Implementation and training services are normally rendered
based on a mutually agreed upon timetable. As part of the fees paid by our clients, we normally
receive up-front licensing fees. Clients have the option to purchase maintenance services which,
if purchased, are invoiced on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis.
Several clients have purchased our practice management software and, in turn, are providing either
time-share or billing services to single and group practice practitioners. Under the time-share or
billing service agreements, the client provides the use of our software for a fee to one or more
practitioners. Although we typically do not receive a fee directly from the distributors clients,
implementation of such arrangements has, from time to time, resulted in the purchase of additional
software capacity by the distributor, as well as new software purchases made by the distributors
customers should such customers decide to perform the practice management functions in-house.
We continue to concentrate our direct sales and marketing efforts on medical and dental practices,
networks of such practices including MSOs and PHOs, professional schools, community health centers
and other ambulatory care settings.
MSOs, PHOs and similar networks to which we have sold systems provide use of our software to those
group and single physician practices associated with the organization or hospital on either a
service basis or by directing us to contract with those practices for the sale of stand-alone
systems.
We have also entered into marketing assistance agreements with certain of our clients pursuant to
which the clients allow us to demonstrate to potential clients the use of systems on the existing
clients premises.
From time to time we assist prospective clients in identifying third party sources for financing
the purchase of our systems. The financing is typically obtained by the client directly from
institutional lenders and typically takes the form of a loan from the institution secured by the
system to be purchased or a leasing arrangement. We do not guarantee the financing nor retain any
continuing interest in the transaction.
We have numerous clients and do not believe that the loss of any single client would adversely
affect us. No client accounted for 10% or more of our net revenue during the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2011, 2010 or 2009.
Client Service and Support
We believe our success is attributable in part to our client service and support departments. We
offer support to our clients seven days a week, 24 hours a day.
Our client support staff is comprised of specialists who are knowledgeable in the areas of software
and hardware as well as in the day-to-day operations of a practice. System support activities
range from correcting minor procedural problems in the clients system to performing complex
database reconstructions or software updates.
We utilize automated online support systems which assist clients in resolving minor problems and
facilitate automated electronic retrieval of problems and symptoms following a clients call to the
automated support system. Additionally, our online support systems maintain call records,
available at both the clients facility and our offices.
We offer our clients support services for most system components, including hardware and software,
for a fixed monthly, quarterly or annual fee. Clients also receive access to future unspecified
versions of the software, on a when-and-if available basis, as part of support services. We also
subcontract, in certain instances, with third party vendors to perform specific hardware
maintenance tasks.
Implementation and Training
We offer full service implementation and training services. When a client signs a contract for the
purchase of a system that includes implementation and training services, a client
manager/implementation specialist trained in medical and/or dental group practice procedures is
assigned to assist the client in the installation of the system and the training of appropriate
practice staff. Implementation services include loading the software, training client personnel,
data conversion, running test data and assisting in the development and documentation of
procedures. Implementation and training services are provided by our employees as well as
certified third parties and certain resellers.
9
Table of Contents
Training may include a combination of computer assisted instruction (CAI) for certain of our
products, remote training techniques and training classes conducted at the clients or our
office(s). CAI consists of workbooks, computer interaction and self-paced instruction. CAI is
also offered to clients, for an additional charge, after the initial training program is completed
for the purpose of training new and additional employees. Remote training allows a trainer at our
offices to train one or more people at a client site via telephone and computer connection, thus
allowing an interactive and client-specific mode of training without the expense and time required
for travel. In addition, our on-line help and other documentation features facilitate client
training as well as ongoing support.
In addition, NextGen E-learning is an on-line learning subscription service which allows end
users to train on the software on the internet. E-learning allows end users to self manage their
own learning with their personal learning path and pace. The service allows users to track the
status of courses taken.
At present, our training facilities are located in (i) Horsham, Pennsylvania, (ii) Atlanta,
Georgia, (iii) Dallas, Texas and (iv) Irvine, California.
Competition
The markets for healthcare information systems and services are intensely competitive. The
industry is highly fragmented and includes numerous competitors, none of which we believe dominates
these markets. Our principal existing competitors in the healthcare information systems and
services market include: eClinicalWorks, GE Healthcare (GE), Allscripts Healthcare Solutions,
Inc. (Allscripts), EPIC, McKesson and other competitors.
Our recent entry into the small hospital market has introduced new competitors, including Computer
Programs and Systems, Inc., Healthland and Healthcare Management Systems, Inc..
The electronic patient records and connectivity markets, in particular, are subject to rapid
changes in technology, and we expect that competition in these market segments will increase as new
competitors enter the market. We believe our principal competitive advantages are the features and
capabilities of our products and services, our high level of client support and our extensive
experience in the industry.
The revenue cycle management market is also intensely competitive as other healthcare information
systems companies, such as GE, McKesson and Allscripts, are also in the market of selling both
practice management and electronic health records software and medical billing and collection
services.
Product Enhancement and Development
The healthcare information management and computer software and hardware industries are
characterized by rapid technological change requiring us to engage in continuing investments to
update, enhance and improve our systems. During fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, we expended
approximately $32.5 million, $24.5 million and $19.7 million, respectively, on research and
development activities, including capitalized software amounts of $10.7 million, $7.9 million and
$5.9 million, respectively. In addition, a portion of our product enhancements have resulted from
software development work performed under contracts with our clients.
OTHER INFORMATION
Employees
As of March 31, 2011, we employed approximately 1,579 persons, of which 1,537 were full-time
employees. We believe that our future success depends in part upon recruiting and retaining
qualified sales, marketing and technical personnel as well as other employees.
Intellectual Property
To protect our intellectual property, we enter into confidentiality agreements and invention
assignment agreements with our employees with whom such controls are relevant. Certain qualified
employees enter into additional agreements that permit them access under certain circumstances, to
software matters that are both confidential and more strictly controlled. In addition, we include
intellectual property protective provisions in many of our client contracts.
Available Information
Our Internet Web site address is www.qsii.com. We make our periodic and current reports,
together with amendments to these reports, available on our Internet Web site, free of charge, as
soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to,
the Commission. You may access such filings under the Investor Relations button on our Web site.
Members of the public may also read and copy any materials we file with, or furnish to, the
Commission at the Commissions Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. To
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room, please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov that contains the
reports, proxy statements and other information that we file electronically with the Commission.
The information on our Internet Web site is not incorporated by reference into this Report or any
other report or information we file with the Commission.
10
Table of Contents
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The more prominent risks and uncertainties inherent in our business are described below.
However, additional risks and uncertainties may also impair our business operations. If any of the
following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations will
likely suffer. Any of these or other factors could harm our business and future results of
operations and may cause you to lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
The effects of the recent global economic crisis may impact our business, operating results or
financial condition. The recent global economic crisis has caused a general tightening in the
credit markets, lower levels of liquidity, increases in the rates of default and bankruptcy and
extreme volatility in credit, equity and fixed income markets. These macroeconomic developments
could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition in a number of ways.
For example, current or potential clients may be unable to fund software purchases, which could
cause them to delay, decrease or cancel purchases of our products and services or to not pay us or
to delay paying us for previously purchased products and services. Our clients may cease business
operations or conduct business on a greatly reduced basis. Finally, our investment portfolio is
generally subject to general credit, liquidity, counterparty, market and interest rate risks that
may be exacerbated by the recent global financial crisis. If the banking system or the fixed
income, credit or equity markets continue to deteriorate or remain volatile, our investment
portfolio may be impacted and the values and liquidity of our investments could be adversely
affected as well.
We face significant, evolving competition which, if we fail to properly address, could adversely
affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and price of our stock. The
markets for healthcare information systems are intensely competitive, and we face significant
competition from a number of different sources. Several of our competitors have significantly
greater name recognition as well as substantially greater financial, technical, product development
and marketing resources than we do. There has been significant merger and acquisition activity
among a number of our competitors in recent years. Transaction induced pressures, or other related
factors may result in price erosion or other negative market dynamics that could adversely affect
our business, results of operations, financial condition and price of our stock.
We compete in all of our markets with other major healthcare related companies, information
management companies, systems integrators and other software developers. Competitive pressures and
other factors, such as new product introductions by us or our competitors, may result in price or
market share erosion that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Also, there can be no assurance that our applications will achieve broad market
acceptance or will successfully compete with other available software products.
Our inability to make initial sales of our systems to newly formed groups and/or healthcare
providers that are replacing or substantially modifying their healthcare information systems could
adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. If new systems sales
do not materialize, our near term and longer term revenue will be adversely affected.
Many of our competitors have greater resources than we do. In order to compete successfully, we
must keep pace with our competitors in anticipating and responding to the rapid changes involving
the industry in which we operate, or our business, results of operations and financial condition
may be adversely affected. The software market generally is characterized by rapid technological
change, changing client needs, frequent new product introductions and evolving industry standards.
The introduction of products incorporating new technologies and the emergence of new industry
standards could render our existing products obsolete and unmarketable. There can be no assurance
that we will be successful in developing and marketing new products that respond to technological
changes or evolving industry standards. New product development depends upon significant research
and development expenditures which depend ultimately upon sales growth. Any material shortfall in
revenue or research funding could impair our ability to respond to technological advances or
opportunities in the marketplace and to remain competitive. If we are unable, for technological or
other reasons, to develop and introduce new products in a timely manner in response to changing
market conditions or client requirements, our business, results of operations and financial
condition may be adversely affected.
In response to increasing market demand, we are currently developing new generations of targeted
software products. There can be no assurance that we will successfully develop these new software
products or that these products will operate successfully, or that any such development, even if
successful, will be completed concurrently with or prior to introduction of competing products.
Any such failure or delay could adversely affect our competitive position or could make our current
products obsolete.
We face risk and/or the possibility of claims from activities related to strategic partners, which
could be expensive and time-consuming, divert personnel and other resources from our business and
result in adverse publicity that could harm our business. We rely on third parties to provide
services that affect our business. For example, we use national clearinghouses in the processing
of some insurance claims and we outsource some of our hardware maintenance services and the
printing and delivery of patient statements for our clients. These third parties could raise their
prices and/or be acquired by competitors of ours, which could potentially create short and
long-term disruptions to our business negatively impacting our revenue, profit and/or stock price.
We also have relationships with certain third parties where these third parties serve as sales
channels through which we generate a portion of our revenue. Due to these third-party
relationships, we could be subject to claims as a result of the activities, products, or services
of these third-party service providers even though we were not directly involved in the
circumstances leading to those claims. Even if these claims do not result in liability to us,
defending and investigating these claims could be expensive and time-consuming, divert personnel
and other resources from our business and result in adverse publicity that could harm our business.
11
Table of Contents
We may engage in future acquisitions, which may be expensive and time consuming and from which we
may not realize anticipated benefits.
We may acquire additional businesses, technologies and products if we determine that these
additional businesses, technologies and products are likely to serve our strategic goals. During
fiscal year 2009, we acquired HSI and PMP, both of which are full-service healthcare RCM companies
servicing physician groups and other healthcare clients. During fiscal year 2010, we acquired Opus
and NextGen IS, both of which are developers of software and services for the inpatient market. The
specific risks we may encounter in these types of transactions include but are not limited to the
following:
| potentially dilutive issuances of our securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities and amortization expenses related to intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition; | ||
| use of cash as acquisition currency may adversely affect interest or investment income, thereby potentially adversely affecting our earnings and /or earnings per share; | ||
| difficulty in fully or effectively integrating any acquired technologies or software products into our current products and technologies, where we may not receive the intended benefits of an acquisition; | ||
| difficulty in predicting and responding to issues related to product transition such as development, distribution and client support; | ||
| the possible adverse effect of such acquisitions on existing relationships with third party partners and suppliers of technologies and services; | ||
| the possibility that staff or clients of the acquired company might not accept new ownership and may transition to different technologies or attempt to renegotiate contract terms or relationships, including maintenance or support agreements; | ||
| the possibility that the due diligence process in any such acquisition may not completely identify material issues associated with product quality, product architecture, product development, intellectual property issues, key personnel issues or legal and financial contingencies, including any deficiencies in internal controls and procedures and the costs associated with remedying such deficiencies; | ||
| difficulty in entering geographic and business markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; | ||
| difficulty in integrating acquired operations due to geographical distance and language and cultural differences; and | ||
| the possibility that acquired assets become impaired, requiring us to take a charge to earnings which could be significant. |
A failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses or technology for any of these reasons
could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our failure to manage growth could harm our business, results of operations and financial
condition. We have in the past experienced periods of growth which have placed, and may continue
to place, a significant strain on our non-cash resources. We also anticipate expanding our overall
software development, marketing, sales, client management and training capacity. In the event we
are unable to identify, hire, train and retain qualified individuals in such capacities within a
reasonable timeframe, such failure could have an adverse effect on us. In addition, our ability to
manage future increases, if any, in the scope of our operations or personnel will depend on
significant expansion of our research and development, marketing and sales, management and
administrative and financial capabilities. The failure of our management to effectively manage
expansion in our business could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Our operations are dependent upon our key personnel. If such personnel were to leave unexpectedly,
we may not be able to execute our business plan. Our future performance depends in significant
part upon the continued service of our key technical and senior management personnel, many of whom
have been with us for a significant period of time. These personnel have acquired specialized
knowledge and skills with respect to our business. We maintain key man life insurance on only one
of our employees. Because we have a relatively small number of employees when compared to other
leading companies in our industry, our dependence on maintaining our relationships with key
employees is particularly significant. We are also dependent on our ability to attract high
quality personnel, particularly in the areas of sales and applications development.
The industry in which we operate is characterized by a high level of employee mobility and
aggressive recruiting of skilled personnel. There can be no assurance that our current employees
will continue to work for us. Loss of services of key employees could have an adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, we may need to grant
additional equity incentives to key employees and provide other forms of incentive compensation to
attract and retain such key personnel. Equity incentives may be dilutive to our per share
financial performance. Failure to provide such types of incentive compensation could jeopardize
our recruitment and retention capabilities.
Continuing worldwide political and economic uncertainties may adversely affect our revenue and
profitability. The last several years have been periodically marked by concerns including but not
limited to inflation, decreased consumer confidence, the lingering effects of international
conflicts, energy costs and terrorist and military activities. These conditions can make it
extremely difficult for our clients, our vendors and us to accurately forecast and plan future
business activities, and they could cause constrained spending on our products and services and/or
delay and lengthen sales cycles.
We are implementing a new company-wide enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. The
implementation process is complex and involves a number of risks that may adversely affect our
business and results of operations. We are currently replacing our multiple legacy business systems
at different sites with a new company-wide, integrated ERP system to handle various business,
operating and financial processes. The new system will enhance a variety of important functions,
such as order entry, invoicing, accounts receivable, accounts payable, financial consolidation, and
internal and external financial and management reporting matters.
12
Table of Contents
ERP implementations are complex and time-consuming projects that involve substantial expenditures
on system hardware and software and implementation activities that often continue for several
years. Such an integrated, wide-scale implementation is extremely complex and requires
transformation of business and financial processes in order to reap the benefits of the ERP system.
Significant efforts are required for requirements identification, functional design, process
documentation, data conversion, user training and post implementation support. Problems in any of
these areas could result in operational issues including delayed billing and accounting errors and
other operational issues. System delays or malfunctioning could also disrupt our ability to timely
and accurately process and report results of our operations, financial position and cash flows,
which could impact our ability to timely complete important business processes such as the
evaluation of its internal controls and attestation activities pursuant to Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Until the new ERP system is fully implemented, we expect to incur additional selling, general and
administrative expenses and capital expenditures to implement and test the system, and there can be
no assurance that other issues relating to the ERP system will not occur or be identified. Our
business and results of operations may be adversely affected if it experiences operating problems
and/or cost overruns during the ERP implementation process or if the ERP system and the associated
process changes, do not function as expected or give rise to the expected benefits.
We own a captive facility, located in India and we are subject to regulatory, economic, social and
political uncertainties in India. We are subject to several risks associated with having a portion
of our assets and operations located in India. Many US companies have benefited from many policies
of the Government of India and the Indian state governments in the states in which we operate,
which are designed to promote foreign investment generally and the business process services
industry in particular, including significant tax incentives, relaxation of regulatory
restrictions, liberalized import and export duties and preferential rules on foreign investment and
repatriation. There is no assurance that such policies will continue. Various factors, such as
changes in the current federal government, could trigger significant changes in Indias economic
liberalization and deregulation policies and disrupt business and economic conditions in India
generally and our business in particular. In addition, our financial performance and the market
price of our common shares may be adversely affected by general economic conditions and economic
and fiscal policy in India, including changes in exchange rates and controls, interest rates and
taxation policies, as well as social stability and political, economic or diplomatic developments
affecting India in the future. In particular, India has experienced significant economic growth
over the last several years, but faces major challenges in sustaining that growth in the years
ahead. These challenges include the need for substantial infrastructure development and improving
access to healthcare and education. Our ability to recruit, train and retain qualified employees,
develop and operate our captive facility could be adversely affected if India does not successfully
meet these challenges.
Risks Related to Our Products and Service
If our principal products and our new product development fail to meet the needs of our clients, we
may fail to realize future growth. We currently derive substantially all of our net revenue from
sales of our healthcare information systems and related services. We believe that a primary factor
in the market acceptance of our systems has been our ability to meet the needs of users of
healthcare information systems. Our future financial performance will depend in large part on our
ability to continue to meet the increasingly sophisticated needs of our clients through the timely
development and successful introduction and implementation of new and enhanced versions of our
systems and other complementary products. We have historically expended a significant percentage
of our net revenue on product development and believe that significant continuing product
development efforts will be required to sustain our growth. Continued investment in our sales
staff and our client implementation and support staffs will also be required to support future
growth.
There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our product development efforts, that the
market will continue to accept our existing products, or that new products or product enhancements
will be developed and implemented in a timely manner, meet the requirements of healthcare
providers, or achieve market acceptance. If new products or product enhancements do not achieve
market acceptance, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely
affected. At certain times in the past, we have also experienced delays in purchases of our
products by clients anticipating our launch, or the launch of our competitors, of new products.
There can be no assurance that material order deferrals in anticipation of new product
introductions from ourselves or other entities will not occur.
If the emerging technologies and platforms of Microsoft and others upon which we build our products
do not gain or continue to maintain broad market acceptance, or if we fail to develop and introduce
in a timely manner new products and services compatible with such emerging technologies, we may not
be able to compete effectively and our ability to generate revenue will suffer. Our software
products are built and depend upon several underlying and evolving relational database management
system platforms such as those developed by Microsoft. To date, the standards and technologies
upon which we have chosen to develop our products have proven to have gained industry acceptance.
However, the market for our software products is subject to ongoing rapid technological
developments, quickly evolving industry standards and rapid changes in client requirements, and
there may be existing or future technologies and platforms that achieve industry standard status,
which are not compatible with our products.
We face the possibility of subscription pricing, which may force us to adjust our sales, marketing
and pricing strategies. In April, 2009 we announced a new subscription based software as a
service delivery model which includes monthly subscription pricing. This model is designed for
smaller practices to quickly access the NextGenehr or NextGenpm products at a
modest monthly per provider price. We currently derive substantially all of our systems revenue
from traditional software license, implementation and training fees, as well as the resale of
computer hardware. Today, the majority of our clients pay an initial license fee for the use of
our products, in addition to a periodic maintenance fee. While the intent of the new subscription
based delivery model is to further penetrate the smaller practice market, there can be no assurance
that this delivery model will not become increasingly popular with both small and large clients.
If the marketplace increasingly demands subscription pricing, we may be forced to further adjust
our sales, marketing and pricing strategies accordingly, by offering a higher percentage of our
13
Table of Contents
products and services through these means. Shifting to a significantly greater degree of
subscription pricing could adversely affect our financial condition, cash flows and quarterly and
annual revenue and results of operations, as our revenue would initially decrease substantially.
There can be no assurance that the marketplace will not increasingly embrace subscription pricing.
We face the possibility of claims based upon our Web site content, which may cause us expense and
management distraction. We could be subject to third party claims based on the nature and content
of information supplied on our Web site by us or third parties, including content providers or
users. We could also be subject to liability for content that may be accessible through our Web
site or third party Web sites linked from our Web site or through content and information that may
be posted by users in chat rooms, bulletin boards or on Web sites created by professionals using
our applications. Even if these claims do not result in liability to us, investigating and
defending against these claims could be expensive and time consuming and could divert managements
attention away from our operations.
If our security measures are breached or fail and unauthorized access is obtained to a clients
data, our services may be perceived as not being secure, clients may curtail or stop using our
services, and we may incur significant liabilities. Our services involve the storage and
transmission of clients proprietary information and protected health information of patients.
Because of the sensitivity of this information, security features of our software are very
important. If our security measures are breached or fail as a result of third-party action,
employee error, malfeasance, insufficiency, defective design, or otherwise, someone may be able to
obtain unauthorized access to client or patient data. As a result, our reputation could be damaged,
our business may suffer, and we could face damages for contract breach, penalties for violation of
applicable laws or regulations and significant costs for remediation and remediation efforts to
prevent future occurrences. We rely upon our clients as users of our system for key activities to
promote security of the system and the data within it, such as administration of client-side access
credentialing and control of client-side display of data. On occasion, our clients have failed to
perform these activities. Failure of clients to perform these activities may result in claims
against us that this reliance was misplaced, which could expose us to significant expense and harm
to our reputation. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems
change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be
unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventive measures. If an actual or
perceived breach of our security occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security
measures could be harmed and we could lose sales and clients. In addition, our clients may
authorize or enable third parties to access their client data or the data of their patients on our
systems. Because we do not control such access, we cannot ensure the complete propriety of that
access or integrity or security of such data in our systems.
Failure by our clients to obtain proper permissions and waivers may result in claims against us or
may limit or prevent our use of data, which could harm our business. We require our clients to
provide necessary notices and to obtain necessary permissions and waivers for use and disclosure of
the information that we receive, and we require contractual assurances from them that they have
done so and will do so. If they do not obtain necessary permissions and waivers, then our use and
disclosure of information that we receive from them or on their behalf may be limited or prohibited
by state or federal privacy laws or other laws. This could impair our functions, processes and
databases that reflect, contain, or are based upon such data and may prevent use of such data. In
addition, this could interfere with or prevent creation or use of rules and analyses or limit other
data-driven activities that benefit us. Moreover, we may be subject to claims or liability for use
or disclosure of information by reason of lack of valid notice, permission or waiver. These claims
or liabilities could subject us to unexpected costs and adversely affect our operating results.
We face the possibility of damages resulting from internal and external security breaches and
viruses. In the course of our business operations, we compile and transmit confidential
information, including patient health information, in our processing centers and other facilities.
A breach of security in any of these facilities could damage our reputation and result in damages
being assessed against us. In addition, the other systems with which we may interface, such as the
Internet and related systems may be vulnerable to security breaches, viruses, programming errors,
or similar disruptive problems. The effect of these security breaches and related issues could
disrupt our ability to perform certain key business functions and could potentially reduce demand
for our services. Accordingly, we have expended significant resources toward establishing and
enhancing the security of our related infrastructures, although no assurance can be given that they
will be entirely free from potential breach. Maintaining and enhancing our infrastructure security
may require us to expend significant capital in the future.
The success of our strategy to offer our EDI services and Internet solutions depends on the
confidence of our clients in our ability to securely transmit confidential information. Our EDI
services and Internet solutions rely on encryption, authentication and other security technology
licensed from third parties to achieve secure transmission of confidential information. We may not
be able to stop unauthorized attempts to gain access to or disrupt the transmission of
communications by our clients. Anyone who is able to circumvent our security measures could
misappropriate confidential user information or interrupt our, or our clients, operations. In
addition, our EDI and Internet solutions may be vulnerable to viruses, physical or electronic
break-ins and similar disruptions.
Any failure to provide secure infrastructure and/or electronic communication services could result
in a lack of trust by our clients causing them to seek out other vendors and/or damage our
reputation in the market, making it difficult to obtain new clients.
We are subject to the development and maintenance of the Internet infrastructure, which is not
within our control, and which may diminish Internet usage and availability as well as access to our
Web site. We deliver Internet-based services and, accordingly, we are dependent on the maintenance
of the Internet by third parties. The Internet infrastructure may be unable to support the demands
placed on it and our performance may decrease if the Internet continues to experience its historic
trend of expanding usage. As a result of damage to portions of its infrastructure, the Internet
has experienced a variety of performance problems which may continue into the foreseeable future.
Such Internet related problems may diminish Internet usage and availability of the Internet to us
for transmittal of our Internet-based services. In addition, difficulties, outages
14
Table of Contents
and delays by Internet service providers, online service providers and other Web site operators may
obstruct or diminish access to our Web site by our clients resulting in a loss of potential or
existing users of our services.
Our products may be subject to product liability legal claims, which could have an adverse effect
on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Certain of our products provide
applications that relate to patient clinical information. Any failure by our products to provide
accurate and timely information concerning patients, their medication, treatment and health status,
generally, could result in claims against us which could materially and adversely impact our
financial performance, industry reputation and ability to market new system sales. In addition, a
court or government agency may take the position that our delivery of health information directly,
including through licensed practitioners, or delivery of information by a third party site that a
consumer accesses through our Web sites, exposes us to assertions of malpractice, other personal
injury liability, or other liability for wrongful delivery/handling of healthcare services or
erroneous health information. We maintain insurance to protect against claims associated with the
use of our products as well as liability limitation language in our end-user license agreements,
but there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage or contractual language would adequately
cover any claim asserted against us. A successful claim brought against us in excess of or outside
of our insurance coverage could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition. Even unsuccessful claims could result in our expenditure of funds for
litigation and management time and resources.
Certain healthcare professionals who use our Internet-based products will directly enter health
information about their patients including information that constitutes a record under applicable
law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal and state laws and regulations,
the common law and contractual obligations, govern collection, dissemination, use and
confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information, including:
| state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws; | ||
| our contracts with clients and partners; | ||
| state laws regulating healthcare professionals; | ||
| Medicaid laws; | ||
| the HIPAA and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing Administration; and | ||
| Health Care Financing Administration standards for Internet transmission of health data. |
HIPAA establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal privacy and security standards
for the use and protection of Protected Health Information. Any failure by us or by our personnel
or partners to comply with applicable requirements may result in a material liability to us.
Although we have systems and policies in place for safeguarding Protected Health Information from
unauthorized disclosure, these systems and policies may not preclude claims against us for alleged
violations of applicable requirements. Also, third party sites and/or links that consumers may
access through our web sites may not maintain adequate systems to safeguard this information, or
may circumvent systems and policies we have put in place. In addition, future laws or changes in
current laws may necessitate costly adaptations to our policies, procedures, or systems.
There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to product liability claims, that such claims
will not result in liability in excess of our insurance coverage, that our insurance will cover
such claims or that appropriate insurance will continue to be available to us in the future at
commercially reasonable rates. Such product liability claims could adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to the effect of payor and provider conduct which we cannot control and accordingly,
there is no assurance that revenue for our services will continue at historic levels. We offer
certain electronic claims submission products and services as part of our product line. While we
have implemented certain product features designed to maximize the accuracy and completeness of
claims submissions, these features may not be sufficient to prevent inaccurate claims data from
being submitted to payors. Should inaccurate claims data be submitted to payors, we may be subject
to liability claims.
Electronic data transmission services are offered by certain payors to healthcare providers that
establish a direct link between the provider and payor. This process reduces revenue to third
party EDI service providers such as us. As a result of this, or other market factors, we are
unable to ensure that we will continue to generate revenue at or in excess of prior levels for such
services.
A significant increase in the utilization of direct links between healthcare providers and payors
could adversely affect our transaction volume and financial results. In addition, we cannot
provide assurance that we will be able to maintain our existing links to payors or develop new
connections on terms that are economically satisfactory to us, if at all.
Risks Related to Regulation
We face increasing involvement of the federal government in our industry, which may give rise to
uncertain and unwarranted expectations concerning the benefits we are to receive from government
funding and programs. In February 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act (ARRA), which allocates over $20 billion dollars to healthcare IT over the next
several years. The provision of the legislation that addresses health information technology
specifically is known as the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act
(HITECH Act). Under the provisions of HITECH Act, the ARRA includes significant financial
incentives to healthcare providers who can demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology
beginning in 2011. While the Company expects the ARRA to create
15
Table of Contents
significant opportunities for sales of NextGenehr over the next several years, we are
unsure of the immediate impact from the ARRA and the long-term potential could be significant.
In order for our customers to qualify for incentives related to EHR use, our products must meet
various requirements for product certification under the regulations and must enable our customers
to achieve meaningful use, as such term is currently defined under the July 28, 2010 Final Rule
adopted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (CMS), and under any future regulations and guidance that CMS may release related to the
incentive program. The CMS Final Rule provides for a phased approach to implementation of the
meaningful use standards, with Stage 1 set forth in the final rule and Stages 2 and 3 reserved for
future rulemaking based upon the experiences with Stage 1. Also, a final rule has been implemented
by the Office of National Coordinator, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, to adopt an
initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria to enhance the
use of health information technology and support its meaningful use. Given that CMS will release
future regulations related to electronic health records, our ability to achieve product
certification by CCHIT® and other regulatory bodies, and the length, if any, of additional related
development and other efforts required to meet meaningful use standards could materially impact our
ability to compete and to maximize our market opportunity.
We face the risks and uncertainties that are associated with litigation against us, which may
adversely impact our marketing, distract management and have a negative impact upon our business,
results of operations and financial condition. We face the risks associated with litigation
concerning the operation of our business. The uncertainty associated with substantial unresolved
litigation may have an adverse effect on our business. In particular, such litigation could impair
our relationships with existing clients and our ability to obtain new clients. Defending such
litigation may result in a diversion of managements time and attention away from business
operations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Such litigation may also have the effect of discouraging potential acquirers from
bidding for us or reducing the consideration such acquirers would otherwise be willing to pay in
connection with an acquisition.
There can be no assurance that such litigation will not result in liability in excess of our
insurance coverage, that our insurance will cover such claims or that appropriate insurance will
continue to be available to us in the future at commercially reasonable rates.
Because we believe that proprietary rights are material to our success, misappropriation of these
rights could adversely affect our financial condition. We are heavily dependent on the maintenance
and protection of our intellectual property and we rely largely on license agreements,
confidentiality procedures and employee nondisclosure agreements to protect our intellectual
property. Our software is not patented and existing copyright laws offer only limited practical
protection.
There can be no assurance that the legal protections and precautions we take will be adequate to
prevent misappropriation of our technology or that competitors will not independently develop
technologies equivalent or superior to ours. Further, the laws of some foreign countries do not
protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States and are
often not enforced as vigorously as those in the United States.
We do not believe that our operations or products infringe on the intellectual property rights of
others. However, there can be no assurance that others will not assert infringement or trade
secret claims against us with respect to our current or future products or that any such assertion
will not require us to enter into a license agreement or royalty arrangement or other financial
arrangement with the party asserting the claim. Responding to and defending any such claims may
distract the attention of our management and adversely affect our business, results of operations
and financial condition. In addition, claims may be brought against third parties from which we
purchase software, and such claims could adversely affect our ability to access third party
software for our systems.
If we are deemed to infringe on the proprietary rights of third parties, we could incur
unanticipated expense and be prevented from providing our products and services. We are and may
continue to be subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of our
competitors grows and our applications functionality is viewed as similar or overlapping with
competitive products. We do not believe that we have infringed or are infringing on any
proprietary rights of third parties. However, claims are occasionally asserted against us, and we
cannot assure you that infringement claims will not be asserted against us in the future. Also, we
cannot assure you that any such claims will be unsuccessful. We could incur substantial costs and
diversion of management resources defending any infringement claims even if we are ultimately
successful in the defense of such matters. Furthermore, a party making a claim against us could
secure a judgment awarding substantial damages, as well as injunctive or other equitable relief
that could effectively block our ability to provide products or services. In addition, we cannot
assure you that licenses for any intellectual property of third parties that might be required for
our products or services will be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
We are dependent on our license rights and other services from third parties, which may cause us to
discontinue, delay or reduce product shipments. We depend upon licenses for some of the technology
used in our products as well as other services from third-party vendors. Most of these
arrangements can be continued/renewed only by mutual consent and may be terminated for any number
of reasons. We may not be able to continue using the products or services made available to us
under these arrangements on commercially reasonable terms or at all. As a result, we may have to
discontinue, delay or reduce product shipments or services provided until we can obtain equivalent
technology or services. Most of our third-party licenses are non-exclusive. Our competitors may
obtain the right to use any of the business elements covered by these arrangements and use these
elements to compete directly with us. In addition, if our vendors choose to discontinue providing
their technology or services in the future or are unsuccessful in their continued research and
development efforts, we may not be able to modify or adapt our own products.
16
Table of Contents
There is significant uncertainty in the healthcare industry in which we operate, and we are subject
to the possibility of changing government regulation, which may adversely impact our business,
financial condition and results of operations. The healthcare industry is subject to changing
political, economic and regulatory influences that may affect the procurement processes and
operation of healthcare facilities. During the past several years, the healthcare industry has
been subject to an increase in governmental regulation of, among other things, reimbursement rates
and certain capital expenditures.
Recently enacted public laws reforming the U.S. healthcare system may have an impact on our
business. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590; Public Law 111-148) (PPACA)
and The Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872) (the Reconciliation
Act), which amends the PPACA (collectively the Health Reform Laws), were signed into law in
March 2010. The Health Reform Laws contain various provisions which may impact us and our
customers. Some of these provisions may have a positive impact, by expanding the use of electronic
health records in certain federal programs, for example, while others, such as reductions in
reimbursement for certain types of providers, may have a negative impact due to fewer available
resources. Increases in fraud and abuse penalties may also adversely affect participants in the
health care sector, including us.
Various legislators have announced that they intend to examine further proposals to reform certain
aspects of the U.S. healthcare system. Healthcare providers may react to these proposals, and the
uncertainty surrounding such proposals, by curtailing or deferring investments, including those for
our systems and related services. Cost-containment measures instituted by healthcare providers as
a result of regulatory reform or otherwise could result in a reduction in the allocation of capital
funds. Such a reduction could have an adverse effect on our ability to sell our systems and
related services. On the other hand, changes in the regulatory environment have increased and may
continue to increase the needs of healthcare organizations for cost-effective data management and
thereby enhance the overall market for healthcare management information systems. We cannot
predict what effect, if any, such proposals or healthcare reforms might have on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
As existing regulations mature and become better defined, we anticipate that these regulations will
continue to directly affect certain of our products and services, but we cannot fully predict the
effect at this time. We have taken steps to modify our products, services and internal practices
as necessary to facilitate our compliance with the regulations, but there can be no assurance that
we will be able to do so in a timely or complete manner. Achieving compliance with these
regulations could be costly and distract managements attention and divert other company resources,
and any noncompliance by us could result in civil and criminal penalties.
Developments of additional federal and state regulations and policies have the potential to
positively or negatively affect our business.
Our software may potentially be subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) as a medical device. Such regulation could require the registration of the applicable
manufacturing facility and software and hardware products, application of detailed record-keeping
and manufacturing standards, and FDA approval or clearance prior to marketing. An approval or
clearance requirement could create delays in marketing, and the FDA could require supplemental
filings or object to certain of these applications, the result of which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to false or fraudulent claim laws. There are numerous federal and state laws
that forbid submission of false information or the failure to disclose information in connection
with submission and payment of physician claims for reimbursement. In some cases, these laws also
forbid abuse of existing systems for such submission and payment. Any failure of our RCM services
to comply with these laws and regulations could result in substantial liability including, but not
limited to, criminal liability, could adversely affect demand for our services and could force us
to expend significant capital, research and development and other resources to address the failure.
Errors by us or our systems with respect to entry, formatting, preparation or transmission of
claim information may be determined or alleged to be in violation of these laws and regulations.
Determination by a court or regulatory agency that our services violate these laws could subject us
to civil or criminal penalties, invalidate all or portions of some of our client contracts, require
us to change or terminate some portions of our business, require us to refund portions of our
services fees, cause us to be disqualified from serving clients doing business with government
payors and have an adverse effect on our business.
In most cases where we are permitted to do so, we calculate charges for our RCM services based on a
percentage of the collections that our clients receive as a result of our services. To the extent
that violations or liability for violations of these laws and regulations require intent, it may be
alleged that this percentage calculation provides us or our employees with incentive to commit or
overlook fraud or abuse in connection with submission and payment of reimbursement claims. The
U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has stated that it is concerned that
percentage-based billing services may encourage billing companies to commit or to overlook
fraudulent or abusive practices.
A portion of our business involves billing of Medicare claims on behalf of its clients. In an
effort to combat fraudulent Medicare claims, the federal government offers rewards for reporting of
Medicare fraud which could encourage others to subject us to a charge of fraudulent claims,
including charges that are ultimately proven to be without merit.
If our products fail to comply with evolving government and industry standards and regulations, we
may have difficulty selling our products. We may be subject to additional federal and state
statutes and regulations in connection with offering services and products via the Internet. On an
increasingly frequent basis, federal and state legislators are proposing laws and regulations that
apply to Internet commerce and communications. Areas being affected by these regulations include
user privacy, pricing, content, taxation, copyright protection, distribution, and quality of
products and services. To the extent that our products and services are subject to these laws and
regulations, the sale of our products and services could be harmed.
17
Table of Contents
We are subject to changes in and interpretations of financial accounting matters that govern the
measurement of our performance, one or more of which could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, cash flows, revenue and results of operations. Based on our reading and interpretations
of relevant guidance, principles or concepts issued by, among other authorities, the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the
Commission, we believe our current sales and licensing contract terms and business arrangements
have been properly reported. However, there continue to be issued interpretations and guidance for
applying the relevant standards to a wide range of sales and licensing contract terms and business
arrangements that are prevalent in the software industry. Future interpretations or changes by the
regulators of existing accounting standards or changes in our business practices could result in
changes in our revenue recognition and/or other accounting policies and practices that could
adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows, revenue and results of operations.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could have an adverse effect on our business, and our per share price
may be adversely affected. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section
404) and the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC to implement Section 404, we are
required to include in our Form 10-K a report by our management regarding the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting. The report includes, among other things, an assessment
of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The assessment must include
disclosure of any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting identified by
management.
As part of the ongoing evaluation being undertaken by management and our independent registered
public accountants pursuant to Section 404, our internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of March 31, 2011. However, if we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure
controls or internal controls over financial reporting, we may discover material weaknesses that we
would then be required to disclose. Any material weaknesses identified in our internal controls
could have an adverse effect on our business. We may not be able to accurately or timely report on
our financial results, and we might be subject to investigation by regulatory authorities. This
could result in a loss of investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial
reports, which may have an adverse effect on our stock price.
No evaluation process can provide complete assurance that our internal controls will detect and
correct all failures within our company to disclose material information otherwise required to be
reported. The effectiveness of our controls and procedures could also be limited by simple errors
or faulty judgments. In addition, if we continue to expand, through either organic growth or
through acquisitions (or both), the challenges involved in implementing appropriate controls will
increase and may require that we evolve some or all of our internal control processes.
It is also possible that the overall scope of Section 404 may be revised in the future, thereby
causing our auditors and ourselves to review, revise or reevaluate our internal control processes
which may result in the expenditure of additional human and financial resources.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
The unpredictability of our quarterly operating results may cause the price of our common stock to
fluctuate or decline. Our revenue may fluctuate in the future from quarter to quarter and period
to period, as a result of a number of factors including, without limitation:
| the size and timing of orders from clients; | ||
| the specific mix of software, hardware and services in client orders; | ||
| the length of sales cycles and installation processes; | ||
| the ability of our clients to obtain financing for the purchase of our products; | ||
| changes in pricing policies or price reductions by us or our competitors; | ||
| the timing of new product announcements and product introductions by us or our competitors; | ||
| changes in revenue recognition or other accounting guidelines employed by us and/or established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other rule-making bodies; | ||
| accounting policies concerning the timing of the recognition of revenue; | ||
| the availability and cost of system components; | ||
| the financial stability of clients; | ||
| market acceptance of new products, applications and product enhancements; | ||
| our ability to develop, introduce and market new products, applications and product enhancements; | ||
| our success in expanding our sales and marketing programs; | ||
| deferrals of client orders in anticipation of new products, applications, product enhancements, or public/private sector initiatives; | ||
| execution of or changes to our strategy; | ||
| personnel changes; and | ||
| general market/economic factors. |
Our software products are generally shipped as orders are received and accordingly, we have
historically operated with a minimal backlog of license fees. As a result, revenue in any quarter
is dependent on orders booked and shipped in that quarter and is not predictable with any degree of
certainty. Furthermore, our systems can be relatively large and expensive, and individual systems
sales can represent a significant portion of our revenue and profits for a quarter such that the
loss or deferral of even one such sale can adversely affect our quarterly revenue and
profitability.
18
Table of Contents
Clients often defer systems purchases until our quarter end, so quarterly results generally cannot
be predicted and frequently are not known until after the quarter has concluded.
Our sales are dependent upon clients initial decisions to replace or substantially modify their
existing information systems, and subsequently, their decision concerning which products and
services to purchase. These are major decisions for healthcare providers and, accordingly, the
sales cycle for our systems can vary significantly and typically ranges from six to twenty four
months from initial contact to contract execution/shipment.
Because a significant percentage of our expenses are relatively fixed, a variation in the timing of
systems sales, implementations and installations can cause significant variations in operating
results from quarter to quarter. As a result, we believe that interim period-to-period comparisons
of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as
indications of future performance. Further, our historical operating results are not necessarily
indicative of future performance for any particular period.
We currently recognize revenue pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 985-605, Software, Revenue Recognition, or ASC 985-605. ASC
985-605 summarizes the FASBs views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue
recognition in financial statements.
There can be no assurance that application and subsequent interpretations of these pronouncements
will not further modify our revenue recognition policies, or that such modifications would not
adversely affect our operating results reported in any particular quarter or year.
Due to all of the foregoing factors, it is possible that our operating results may be below the
expectations of public market analysts and investors. In such event, the price of our common stock
would likely be adversely affected.
Our common stock price has been volatile, which could result in substantial losses for investors
purchasing shares of our common stock and in litigation against us. Volatility may be caused by a
number of factors including but not limited to:
| actual or anticipated quarterly variations in operating results; | ||
| rumors about our performance, software solutions, or merger and acquisition activity; | ||
| changes in expectations of future financial performance or changes in estimates of securities analysts; | ||
| governmental regulatory action; | ||
| health care reform measures; | ||
| client relationship developments; | ||
| purchases or sales of company stock; | ||
| activities by one or more of our major shareholders concerning our policies and operations; | ||
| changes occurring in the markets in general; | ||
| macroeconomic conditions, both nationally and internationally; and | ||
| other factors, many of which are beyond our control. |
Furthermore, the stock market in general, and the market for software, healthcare and high
technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme volatility that often has been
unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry
fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock, regardless of actual
operating performance.
Moreover, in the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company
following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the
target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources.
Two of our directors are significant shareholders, which makes it possible for them to have
significant influence over the outcome of all matters submitted to our shareholders for approval
and which influence may be alleged to conflict with our interests and the interests of our other
shareholders. Two of our directors and principal shareholders beneficially owned an aggregate of
approximately 33.4% of the outstanding shares of our common stock at March 31, 2011. California
law and our Bylaws permit our shareholders to cumulate their votes, the effect of which is to
provide shareholders with sufficiently large concentrations of our shares the opportunity to assure
themselves one or more seats on our Board of Directors. The amounts required to assure a Board
position can vary based upon the number of shares outstanding, the number of shares voting, the
number of directors to be elected, the number of broker non-votes, and the number of shares held
by the shareholder exercising cumulative voting rights. In the event that cumulative voting is
invoked, it is likely that the two of our directors holding an aggregate of approximately 33.4% of
the outstanding shares of our common stock at March 31, 2011 will each have sufficient votes to
assure themselves of one or more seats on our Board of Directors. With or without cumulative
voting, these shareholders will have significant influence over the outcome of all matters
submitted to our shareholders for approval, including the election of our directors and other
corporate actions. In fiscal year 2009, one of the principal shareholders, Ahmed Hussein, proposed
a different slate of directors than what the Company proposed to shareholders. The Company spent
approximately $1.5 million to defend the Companys slate. In addition, such influence by one or
both of these shareholders could have the effect of discouraging others from attempting to purchase
us or to implement a change over our Board of Directors, which could result in a reduction of the
market price offered for our common stock in such an event.
19
Table of Contents
Our future policy concerning the payment of dividends is uncertain, which could adversely affect
the price of our stock. We have announced our intention to pay a quarterly dividend commencing
with the conclusion of our first fiscal quarter of 2008 (June 30, 2007) and pursuant to this policy
our Board of Directors has declared a quarterly cash dividend ranging from $0.25 to its most recent
level of $0.35 per share on our outstanding shares of common stock, each quarter thereafter. We
anticipate that future quarterly dividends, if and when declared by our Board of Directors pursuant
to this policy, would likely be distributable on or about the fifth day of each of the months of
October, January, April and July. There can be no guarantees that we will have the financial
wherewithal to fund this dividend in perpetuity or to pay it at historic rates. Further, our Board
of Directors may decide not to pay the dividend at some future time for financial or non-financial
reasons. Unfulfilled expectations regarding future dividends could adversely affect the price of
our stock.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters, QSI Dental Division and NextGen Division training operations are
located in Irvine, California. Should we continue to grow, we may be required to lease additional
space. We believe that suitable additional or substitute space is available, if needed, at market
rates.
As of March 31, 2011, we lease an aggregate of approximately 321,000 square feet of space with
expiration dates, excluding options, ranging from month-to-month to September 2016, as follows:
Square Feet | ||||
QSI Dental Division |
||||
Irvine, California Corporate Headquarters |
34,800 | |||
NextGen Division |
||||
Horsham, Pennsylvania |
98,000 | |||
Atlanta, Georgia |
35,000 | |||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
||||
Austin, Texas |
39,000 | |||
Irvine, California |
4,200 | |||
Practice Solutions Division |
||||
St. Louis, Missouri |
67,000 | |||
Hunt Valley, Maryland |
33,000 | |||
Other U.S. locations |
10,000 | |||
Total leased properties |
321,000 | |||
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the normal course of business, we are involved in various claims and legal proceedings. While
the ultimate resolution of these currently pending matters has yet to be determined, we do not
presently believe that their outcome will materially and adversely affect our financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
We have experienced legal claims by parties asserting that we have infringed their intellectual
property rights. We believe that these claims are without merit and intend to defend against them
vigorously; however, we could incur substantial costs and diversion of management resources
defending any infringement claim, even if we are ultimately successful in the defense of such
matter. Litigation is inherently uncertain and always difficult to predict. We refer you to the
discussion of infringement and litigation risks in our Item 1A. Risk Factors section of this
Report.
20
Table of Contents
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Price and Holders
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol QSII. The
following table sets forth for the quarters indicated the high and low sales prices for each period
indicated, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market:
High | Low | |||||||
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
June 30, 2009 |
$ | 62.00 | $ | 43.44 | ||||
September 30, 2009 |
$ | 64.16 | $ | 50.87 | ||||
December 31, 2009 |
$ | 65.98 | $ | 57.63 | ||||
March 31, 2010 |
$ | 68.59 | $ | 51.30 | ||||
June 30, 2010 |
$ | 68.89 | $ | 53.86 | ||||
September 30, 2010 |
$ | 67.27 | $ | 52.90 | ||||
December 31, 2010 |
$ | 71.81 | $ | 58.35 | ||||
March 31, 2011 |
$ | 83.68 | $ | 69.33 |
At
May 23, 2011, there were approximately 78 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
In January 2007, our Board of Directors adopted a policy whereby we intend to pay a regular
quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share on our outstanding Common Stock, subject to further Board
review and approval and establishment of record and distribution dates by our Board of Directors
prior to the declaration of each such quarterly dividend. Our Board of Directors increased the
quarterly dividend to $0.30 per share in August 2008 and to $0.35 per share in January 2011. We
anticipate that future quarterly dividends, if and when declared by our Board of Directors pursuant
to this policy, would likely be distributable on or about the fifth day of each of the months of
October, January, April and July.
On May 25, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.35 per share on
the Companys outstanding shares of Common Stock, payable to shareholders of record as of June 17,
2011 with an expected distribution date on or about July 5, 2011.
Our Board of Directors declared the following dividends during the periods presented:
Per Share | ||||||||
Declaration Date | Record Date | Payment Date | Dividend | |||||
May 26, 2010 |
June 17, 2010 | July 6, 2010 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
July 28, 2010 |
September 17, 2010 | October 5, 2010 | 0.30 | |||||
October 25, 2010 |
December 17, 2010 | January 5, 2011 | 0.30 | |||||
January 26, 2011 |
March 17, 2011 | April 5, 2011 | 0.35 | |||||
Fiscal year 2011 |
$ | 1.25 | ||||||
May 27, 2009 |
June 12, 2009 | July 6, 2009 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
July 23, 2009 |
September 25, 2009 | October 5, 2009 | 0.30 | |||||
October 28, 2009 |
December 23, 2009 | January 5, 2010 | 0.30 | |||||
January 27, 2010 |
March 23, 2010 | April 5, 2010 | 0.30 | |||||
Fiscal year 2010 |
$ | 1.20 | ||||||
May 29, 2008 |
June 15, 2008 | July 2, 2008 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
August 4, 2008 |
September 15, 2008 | October 1, 2008 | 0.30 | |||||
October 30, 2008 |
December 15, 2008 | January 5, 2009 | 0.30 | |||||
January 28, 2009 |
March 11, 2009 | April 3, 2009 | 0.30 | |||||
Fiscal year 2009 |
$ | 1.15 | ||||||
21
Table of Contents
Payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors after
taking into account various factors, including without limitation, our financial condition,
operating results, current and anticipated cash needs and plans for expansion.
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total returns of our common stock, the NASDAQ Composite
Index and the NASDAQ Computer & Data Processing Services Stock Index over the five-year period
ended March 31, 2011 assuming $100 was invested on March 31, 2006 with all dividends, if any,
reinvested. This performance graph shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) or
otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the
Exchange Act.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Quality Systems, Inc., The NASDAQ Composite Index
And The NASDAQ Computer & Data Processing Index
Among Quality Systems, Inc., The NASDAQ Composite Index
And The NASDAQ Computer & Data Processing Index
* | $100 invested on 3/31/2006 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending March 31. |
The last trade price of our common stock on each of March 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011
was published by NASDAQ and, accordingly for the periods ended March 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and
2011, the reported last trade price was utilized to compute the total cumulative return for our
common stock for the respective periods then ended. Shareholder returns over the indicated periods
should not be considered indicative of future stock prices or shareholder returns.
22
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data with respect to our consolidated statements of income data
for each of the five years in the period ended March 31, 2011 and the consolidated balance sheets
data as of the end of each such fiscal year are derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements. The following information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and the related notes thereto and Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere herein.
Consolidated Financial Data
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Statements of Income Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 353,363 | $ | 291,811 | $ | 245,515 | $ | 186,500 | $ | 157,165 | ||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
127,482 | 110,807 | 88,890 | 62,501 | 50,784 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
225,881 | 181,004 | 156,625 | 123,999 | 106,381 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
108,310 | 86,951 | 69,410 | 53,260 | 45,337 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development costs |
21,797 | 16,546 | 13,777 | 11,350 | 10,166 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
1,682 | 1,783 | 1,035 | | | |||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
94,092 | 75,724 | 72,403 | 59,389 | 50,878 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income |
263 | 226 | 1,203 | 2,661 | 3,306 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
61 | 268 | (279 | ) | 953 | | ||||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
94,416 | 76,218 | 73,327 | 63,003 | 54,184 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
32,810 | 27,839 | 27,208 | 22,925 | 20,952 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 61,606 | $ | 48,379 | $ | 46,119 | $ | 40,078 | $ | 33,232 | ||||||||||
Basic net income per share |
$ | 2.13 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.65 | $ | 1.47 | $ | 1.24 | ||||||||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ | 2.12 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 1.62 | $ | 1.44 | $ | 1.21 | ||||||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
28,947 | 28,635 | 28,031 | 27,298 | 26,882 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
29,118 | 28,796 | 28,396 | 27,770 | 27,550 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 1.25 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 1.00 |
March 31, | March 31, | March 31, | March 31, | March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 116,617 | $ | 84,611 | $ | 70,180 | $ | 59,046 | $ | 60,028 | ||||||||||
Working capital |
$ | 145,758 | $ | 118,935 | $ | 98,980 | $ | 79,932 | $ | 76,616 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 378,686 | $ | 310,180 | $ | 242,101 | $ | 187,908 | $ | 150,681 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 154,016 | $ | 121,891 | $ | 86,534 | $ | 74,203 | $ | 59,435 | ||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
$ | 224,670 | $ | 188,289 | $ | 155,567 | $ | 113,705 | $ | 91,246 |
23
Table of Contents
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (MD&A), including
discussions of our product development plans, business strategies and market factors influencing
our results, may include forward-looking statements that involve certain risks and uncertainties.
Actual results may differ from those anticipated by us as a result of various factors, both
foreseen and unforeseen, including, but not limited to, our ability to continue to develop new
products and increase systems sales in markets characterized by rapid technological evolution,
consolidation and competition from larger, better-capitalized competitors. Many other economic,
competitive, governmental and technological factors could affect our ability to achieve our goals
and interested persons are urged to review any risks that may be described in Item 1A. Risk
Factors as set forth herein, as well as in our other public disclosures and filings with the
Commission.
Overview
This MD&A is provided as a supplement to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this Report) in order to enhance your
understanding of our results of operations and financial condition and should be read in
conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the consolidated financial statements and
related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report. Historical results of operations,
percentage margin fluctuations and any trends that may be inferred from the discussion below are
not necessarily indicative of the operating results for any future period.
Our MD&A is organized as follows:
| Management Overview. This section provides a general description of our Company and operating segments, a discussion as to how we derive our revenue, background information on certain trends and developments affecting our Company, a summary of our acquisition transactions and a discussion on managements strategy for driving revenue growth. | ||
| Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. This section discusses those accounting policies that are considered important to the evaluation and reporting of our financial condition and results of operations, and whose application requires us to exercise subjective or complex judgments in making estimates and assumptions. In addition, all of our significant accounting policies, including our critical accounting policies, are summarized in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of our notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report. | ||
| Company Overview. This section provides a more detailed description of our Company, operating segments, products and services offered. | ||
| Overview of Results of Operations and Results of Operations by Operating Divisions. These sections provide our analysis and outlook for the significant line items on our consolidated statements of income, as well as other information that we deem meaningful to understand our results of operations on both a consolidated basis and an operating division basis. | ||
| Liquidity and Capital Resources. This section provides an analysis of our liquidity and cash flows and discussions of our contractual obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2011. | ||
| New Accounting Pronouncements. This section provides a summary of the most recent authoritative accounting standards and guidance that have either been recently adopted by our Company or may be adopted in the future. |
24
Table of Contents
Management Overview
Quality Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries operates as four business divisions and is comprised of: (i) the QSI Dental Division, (ii) the
NextGen Division, (iii) the Inpatient Solutions Division, (iv) the Practice Solutions and (v)
Quality Systems India Healthcare Private Limited (QSIH). Operationally, Lackland Acquisition II,
LLC dba Healthcare Strategic Initiatives (HSI) and Practice Management Partners, Inc. (PMP)
comprise the Practice Solutions Division while Opus Healthcare Solutions, LLC (Opus) and NextGen
Inpatient Solutions, LLC (NextGen IS f/k/a Sphere) operate under the Inpatient Solutions
Division. We primarily derive revenue by developing and marketing healthcare information systems
that automate certain aspects of medical and dental practices, networks of practices such as
physician hospital organizations (PHOs) and management service organizations (MSOs), ambulatory
care centers, community health centers and medical and dental schools along with comprehensive
systems implementation, maintenance and support and add on complementary services such as revenue
cycle management (RCM) and electronic data interchange (EDI). Our systems and services provide
our clients with the ability to redesign patient care and other workflow processes while improving
productivity through facilitation of managed access to patient information. Utilizing our
proprietary software in combination with third-party hardware and software solutions, our products
enable the integration of a variety of administrative and clinical information operations.
On May 20, 2008, we acquired HSI, a full-service healthcare RCM company. HSI operates under the
umbrella of our Practice Solutions Division. Founded in 1996, HSI provides RCM services to
providers including health systems, hospitals and physicians in private practice with an in-house
team consisting of specialists in medical billing, coding and compliance, payor credentialing and
information technology.
On October 28, 2008, we acquired PMP, a full-service healthcare RCM company. This acquisition is
also part of our growth strategy for our Practice Solutions Division. Similar to HSI, PMP operates
under the umbrella of our Practice Solutions Division. Founded in 2001, PMP provides physician
billing and technology management services to healthcare providers, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic
region.
On August 12, 2009, we acquired NextGen IS, a provider of financial information systems to the
small hospital inpatient market. This acquisition, along with our acquisition of Opus, is part of
our strategy to expand into the small hospital market and to add new clients by taking advantage of
cross-selling opportunities between the ambulatory and inpatient markets.
On February 10, 2010, we acquired Opus, a provider of clinical information systems to the small
hospital inpatient market. Founded in 1987 and headquartered in Austin, Texas, Opus delivers
Web-based clinical solutions to hospital systems and integrated health networks nationwide. This
acquisition complements and will be integrated with the assets and operations of NextGen IS. Both
companies are established developers of software and services for the inpatient market and will
operate under the Inpatient Solutions Division.
In January 2011, QSIH was formed to function as the Companys India-based captive to offshore
technology application development and business processing services.
Our strategy is, at present, to focus on providing software and services to medical and dental
practices. The key elements of this strategy are to continue development and enhancement of select
software solutions in target markets, to continue investments in our infrastructure including but
not limited to product development, sales, marketing, implementation and support, to continue
efforts to make infrastructure investments within an overall context of maintaining reasonable
expense discipline, to add new clients through maintaining and expanding sales, marketing and
product development activities and to expand our relationship with existing clients through
delivery of add-on and complementary products and services and continuing our gold-standard
commitment of service in support of our client satisfaction programs.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial statements and results of operations is
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate estimates (including but not limited to
those related to revenue recognition, uncollectible accounts receivable, software development cost,
intangible assets and self-insurance accruals) for reasonableness. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that may not be readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
25
Table of Contents
We believe that the significant accounting policies, as described in Note 2 of our consolidated
financial statements, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies should be read in conjunction
with managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. We
believe the following table depicts the most critical accounting policies that affect our
consolidated financial statements:
Revenue Recognition
|
Judgments and Uncertainties | |
We generate revenue
from the sale of
licensing rights to
use our software
products sold directly
to end-users and
value-added resellers,
or VARs. We also
generate revenue from
sales of hardware and
third party software,
implementation,
training, software
customization, EDI,
post-contract support
(maintenance) and
other services,
including RCM
services, performed
for clients who
license our products. Revenue from implementation and training services is recognized as the corresponding services are performed. Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the contractual maintenance period. RCM revenue is derived from services fees, which include amounts charged for ongoing billing and other related services and are generally billed to the client as a percentage of total collections. We do not recognize revenue for services fees until these collections are made as the services fees are not fixed or determinable until such time. |
A typical system contract contains multiple
elements of the above items. FASB ASC Topic
985-605-25, Software, Revenue Recognition,
Multiple Elements, or ASC 985-605-25, requires
revenue earned on software arrangements involving
multiple elements to be allocated to each element
based on the relative fair values of those
elements. The fair value of an element must be
based on vendor specific objective evidence
(VSOE). We limit our assessment of VSOE for
each element to either the price charged when the
same element is sold separately or the price
established by management having the relevant
authority to do so, for an element not yet sold
separately. VSOE calculations are updated and
reviewed at the end of each quarter or annually
depending on the nature of the product or service.
We have established VSOE for the related
undelivered elements based on the bell-shaped
curve method. Maintenance VSOE for our largest
clients is based on stated renewal rates only if
the rate is determined to be substantive and falls
within our customary pricing practices. When evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered elements only, the residual method, provided for under ASC 985-605, is used. Under the residual method, we defer revenue related to the undelivered elements in a system sale based on VSOE of fair value of each of the undelivered elements and allocate the remainder of the contract price net of all discounts to revenue recognized from the delivered elements. Undelivered elements of a system sale may include implementation and training services, hardware and third party software, maintenance, future purchase discounts, or other services. If VSOE of fair value of any undelivered element does not exist, all revenue is deferred until VSOE of fair value of the undelivered element is established or the element has been delivered. We bill for the entire system sales contract amount upon contract execution, except for maintenance which is billed separately. Amounts billed in excess of the amounts contractually due are recorded in accounts receivable as advance billings. Amounts are contractually due when services are performed or in accordance with contractually specified payment dates. Provided the fees are fixed or determinable and collection is considered probable, revenue from licensing rights and sales of hardware and third party software is generally recognized upon shipment and transfer of title. In certain transactions whose collections risk is high, the cash basis method is used to recognize revenue. If the fee is not fixed or determinable, then the revenue recognized in each period (subject to application of other revenue recognition criteria) will be the lesser of the aggregate of amounts due and payable or the amount of the arrangement fee that would have been recognized if the fees were being recognized using the residual method. Fees which are considered fixed or determinable at the inception of our arrangements must include the following characteristics: |
|
§ The fee must be negotiated at the
outset of an arrangement and generally be based on
the specific volume of products to be delivered
without being subject to change based on variable
pricing mechanisms such as the number of units
copied or distributed or the expected number of
users; and § Payment terms must not be
considered extended. If a significant portion of
the fee is due more than 12 months after delivery
or after the expiration of the license, the fee is
presumed not fixed or determinable. |
||
Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions | ||
Although we believe that our approach to estimates and judgments as described herein is reasonable, actual results could differ and we may be exposed to increases or decreases in revenue that could be material. |
26
Table of Contents
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
Judgments and Uncertainties | |
We maintain allowances for doubtful
accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of our
clients to make required payments.
We perform credit evaluations of
our clients and maintain reserves
for estimated credit losses.
Reserves for potential credit
losses are determined by
establishing both specific and
general reserves.
|
Specific reserves are based on managements
estimate of the probability of collection for
certain troubled accounts. General reserves
are established based on our historical
experience of bad debt expense and the aging of
our accounts receivable balances net of
deferred revenue and specifically reserved
accounts. If the financial condition of our
clients were to deteriorate resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make payments,
additional allowances would be required. Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions Although we believe that our approach to estimates and judgments as described herein is reasonable, actual results could differ and we may be exposed to increases or decreases in required reserves that could be material. |
|
Software Development Costs
|
Judgments and Uncertainties | |
Development costs incurred in the
research and development of new
software products and enhancements
to existing software products for
external use are expensed as
incurred until technological
feasibility has been established.
After technological feasibility is
established, any additional
external software development costs
are capitalized in accordance with
FASB ASC Topic 985-20, Software,
Costs of Computer Software to be
Sold, Leased or Marketed, or ASC
985-20. Such capitalized costs are
amortized on a straight-line basis
over the estimated economic life of
the related product, which is
typically three years.
|
We perform an annual review of the estimated
economic life and the recoverability of such
capitalized software costs. If a determination
is made that capitalized amounts are not
recoverable based on the estimated cash flows
to be generated from the applicable software,
any remaining capitalized amounts are written
off. Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions Although we believe that our approach to estimates and judgments as described herein is reasonable, actual results could differ and we may be exposed to increases or decreases in revenue that could be material. |
|
Goodwill
|
Judgments and Uncertainties | |
Goodwill is related to NextGen and
the HSI, PMP, NextGen IS and Opus
acquisitions, which closed on May
20, 2008, October 28, 2008, August
12, 2009 and February 10, 2010,
respectively.
|
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350-20,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, Goodwill, or
ASC 350-20, we test goodwill for impairment
annually at the end of our first fiscal
quarter, referred to as the annual test date,
and have determined that there was no
impairment to our goodwill as of June 30, 2010.
We will also test for impairment between
annual test dates if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would indicate the
carrying amount may be impaired. Impairment
testing for goodwill is performed at a
reporting-unit level, which is defined as an
operating segment or one level below and
operating segment (referred to as a component).
A component of an operating segment is a
reporting unit if the component constitutes a
business for which discrete financial
information is available and segment management
regularly reviews the operating results of that
component. We have determined that NextGen, HSI and PMP each qualify as a separate reporting unit while NextGen IS and Opus are aggregated as one reporting unit at which goodwill impairment testing is performed. Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology we use to assess impairment loss during the past three fiscal years. The carrying values of goodwill at March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $46.7 million and $46.2 million, respectively. An impairment loss would generally be recognized when the carrying amount of the reporting units net assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, we have not identified any events or circumstances that would require an interim goodwill impairment test. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to test for impairment losses on goodwill and other intangible assets. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to an impairment charge that could be material. |
27
Table of Contents
Business Combinations Purchase
Price Allocations During the last three fiscal years, we completed three significant acquisitions: In February 2010, we acquired Opus for $20.6 million. In October 2008, we acquired PMP for $19.7 million, including transaction costs. In May 2008, we acquired HSI for $15.6 million, including transaction costs. |
Judgments and Uncertainties In accordance with business combination accounting under FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, or ASC 805, we allocate the purchase price of acquired businesses to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values. Our purchase price allocation methodology contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. Management estimates the fair value of assets and liabilities based upon quoted market prices, the carrying value of the acquired assets and widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows and market multiple analyses. Unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which could affect the accuracy of our fair value estimates, including assumptions regarding industry economic factors and business strategies. Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to complete the purchase price allocation and estimate the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. |
|
Intangible Assets
|
Judgments and Uncertainties | |
Intangible assets consist of
capitalized software costs,
customer relationships, trade names
and certain intellectual property.
Intangible assets related to
customer relationships, trade names
and software technology arose in
connection with the acquisition of
HSI, PMP, NextGen IS and Opus.
|
These intangible assets were recorded at fair
value and are stated net of accumulated
amortization. Intangible assets are amortized
over their remaining estimated useful lives,
ranging from 3 to 9 years. Our amortization
policy for intangible assets is based on the
principles in FASB ASC Topic 350-30,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, General
Intangibles Other than Goodwill, or ASC 350-30,
which requires that the amortization of
intangible assets reflect the pattern that the
economic benefits of the intangible assets are
consumed. Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions Although we believe that our approach to estimates and judgments as described herein is reasonable, actual results could differ and we may be exposed to decreases in the fair value of our intangible assets, resulting in impairment charges that could be material. |
|
Share-Based Compensation
|
Judgments and Uncertainties | |
Our stock-based compensation plans
consist of stock options and
restricted stock units. See Note 9 of our consolidated financial statements
for a complete discussion of our
stock-based compensation programs.
|
We apply the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation, or ASC 718,
which requires the measurement and recognition
of compensation expense for all share-based
payment awards made to employees and directors
based on estimated fair values. ASC 718
requires us to estimate the fair value of
share-based payment awards on the date of grant
using an option-pricing model. Expected term
is estimated using historical exercise
experience. Volatility is estimated by using
the weighted-average historical volatility of
our common stock, which approximates expected
volatility. The risk free rate is the implied
yield available on the U.S Treasury zero-coupon
issues with remaining terms equal to the
expected term. The expected dividend yield is
the average dividend rate during a period equal
to the expected term of the option. Those
inputs are then entered into the Black Scholes
model to determine the estimated fair value.
The value of the portion of the award that is
ultimately expected to vest is recognized
ratably as expense over the requisite service
period in our consolidated statements of
income. On May 26, 2010, the Board of Directors approved its fiscal year 2011 equity incentive program for certain employees to be awarded options to purchase the Companys common stock. Under the program, executives are eligible to receive options based on meeting certain target increases in earnings per share performance and revenue growth during fiscal year 2011. Non-executive employees also are eligible to receive options based on satisfying certain management established criteria and recommendations of senior management. Compensation expense associated with the performance based awards under the Companys 2011 incentive plan are initially based on the number of options expected to vest after assessing the probability that certain performance criteria will be met. Cumulative adjustments are recorded quarterly to reflect subsequent changes in the estimated outcome of performance-related conditions. |
28
Table of Contents
Share-Based Compensation (continued)
|
Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions | |
We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to determine stock-based compensation expense. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to changes in stock-based compensation expense that could be material. | ||
Self-Insured Liabilities
|
Judgments and Uncertainties | |
Effective January 1, 2010, we
became self-insured with respect to
healthcare claims, subject to
stop-loss limits. We accrue for
estimated self-insurance costs and
uninsured exposures based on claims
filed and an estimate of claims
incurred but not reported as of
each balance sheet date. However,
it is possible that recorded
accruals may not be adequate to
cover the future payment of claims.
Adjustments, if any, to estimated
accruals resulting from ultimate
claim payments will be reflected in
earnings during the periods in
which such adjustments are
determined.
|
Our self-insured liabilities contain
uncertainties because management is required to
make assumptions and to apply judgment to
estimate the ultimate cost to settle reported
claims and claims incurred but not reported at
the balance sheet date. Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our self-insured liabilities. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. |
29
Table of Contents
Overview of Our Results
§ | Consolidated revenue increased 21.1% and income from operations grew by 24.3% in the year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year period. Revenue was positively impacted by growth in recurring revenue, including maintenance, EDI and RCM revenue, which grew 23.4%, 17.1% and 22.9%, respectively and accounted for 55.5% of total consolidated revenue for the year ended March 31, 2011. In the same period a year ago, recurring revenue represented 55.1% of total consolidated revenue. Revenue was also positively impacted by growth in sales of systems, which increased 19.6% in the year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year period. | |
§ | The increase in income from operations was partially offset by: (a) higher selling, general and administrative expenses, which was primarily a result of increased headcount expenses and selling-related expenses at the NextGen Division, (b) increased research and development costs, (c) higher corporate-related expenses, (d) amortization of the software technology intangible asset related to the Opus acquisition that is included in cost of sales, and (e) additional expenses related to a fair value adjustment to the contingent consideration liability related to the acquisitions of Opus and NextGen IS. | |
§ | We have benefited and hope to continue to benefit from the increased demands on healthcare providers for greater efficiency and lower costs, financial incentives from the ARRA to physicians who adopt electronic health records, as well as increased adoption rates for electronic health records and other technology in the healthcare arena. | |
§ | While we expect to benefit from the increasing demands for greater efficiency as well as government support for increased adoption of electronic health records, the current economic environment, combined with unpredictability of the federal governments plans to promote increased adoption of electronic medical records, makes the near term achievement of such benefits and, ultimately, their impact on system sales, uncertain. |
NextGen Division
§ | NextGen Division revenue increased 16.5% in the year ended March 31, 2011 and divisional operating income (excluding unallocated corporate expenses) increased 19.4% as compared to the prior year period. |
§ | Recurring revenue, which consists of maintenance and EDI revenue, increased 17.7% to $130.0 million and accounted for 48.8% of total NextGen Division revenue for the year ended March 31, 2011. In the same period a year ago, recurring revenue of $110.4 million represented 48.3% of total NextGen Division revenue. |
§ | During the year ended March 31, 2011, we added staffing resources and increased our investment in research and development in anticipation of growth from the ARRA. Our goals include taking maximum advantage of benefits related to the ARRA and continuing to further enhance our existing products, including continued efforts to maintain our status as a qualified vendor under the ARRA, integrating our inpatient and ambulatory software products, developing new products for targeted markets, continuing to add new clients, selling additional software and services to existing clients, expanding penetration of connectivity and other services to new and existing clients, and capitalizing on growth and cross selling opportunities within the Practice Solutions Division and the Inpatient Solutions Division. |
§ | The NextGen Divisions growth is attributed to a strong brand name and reputation within a growing marketplace for electronic health records and investments in sales and marketing activities, including new marketing campaigns, trade show attendance and other expanded advertising and marketing expenditures. We have also benefited from winning numerous industry awards for the NextGen Divisions flagship NextGenehr and NextGenpm software products and more recently in 2010 for its NextGen HIE product. Further, the increasing acceptance of electronic records technology in the healthcare industry continues to provide growth opportunities. |
QSI Dental Division
§ | QSI Dental Division revenue increased 16.6% in the year ended March 31, 2011 and divisional operating income (excluding unallocated corporate expenses) increased 35.0% as compared to the prior year period. |
§ | An increase of 65.2% in system sales revenue during the year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year period was the chief contributor to the operating income results. The QSI Dental Division has benefited from system sales to Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers (FQHCs), which are typically sold jointly with the NextGen Division. |
§ | The QSI Dental Division is well-positioned to sell to the FQHCs market and intends to continue leveraging the NextGen Divisions sales force to sell its dental electronic medical records software to practices that provide both medical and dental services, such as FQHCs, which are receiving grants as part of the ARRA. |
§ | Our goal for the QSI Dental Division is to maximize profit performance given the constraints represented by a relatively weak purchasing environment in the dental group practice market while taking advantage of opportunities with the new NextDDS product. |
Practice Solutions Division
§ | Practice Solutions Division revenue increased 13.7% in the year ended March 31, 2011 and divisional operating income (excluding unallocated corporate expenses) increased 83.0% as compared to the prior year period. |
§ | The Practice Solutions Division benefited from organic growth achieved through cross selling RCM services to existing NextGen Division clients and well as new clients added during the 2011 fiscal year. |
§ | Gross margin of $14.1 million in the year ended March 31, 2011 was negatively impacted by initial startup costs and other costs related to achieving higher production volume from a new business. |
§ | Operating income as a percentage of revenue increased to approximately 8.7% of revenue in the year ended March 31, 2011 versus 5.4% of revenue in the prior year period primarily as a result of higher RCM revenue, offset by increased costs related to transitioning to the NextGen platform, such as training of staff and initial set up as mentioned above. |
30
Table of Contents
Inpatient Solutions Division
§ | Inpatient Solutions Division revenue in the year ended March 31, 2011 was $17.9 million as compared to $2.9 million in the prior year period. This Division consists of two acquisitions, Opus and NextGen IS, acquired in February 2010 and August 2009, respectively. |
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the percentage of net revenue represented
by each item in our consolidated statements of income (certain percentages below may not sum due to
rounding):
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||
Software, hardware and supplies |
30.1 | % | 30.8 | % | 34.8 | % | ||||||
Implementation and training services |
5.1 | 4.9 | 5.4 | |||||||||
System sales |
35.2 | 35.7 | 40.2 | |||||||||
Maintenance |
31.1 | 30.6 | 29.7 | |||||||||
Electronic data interchange services |
11.6 | 12.0 | 12.0 | |||||||||
Revenue cycle management and related services |
12.8 | 12.6 | 8.7 | |||||||||
Other services |
9.3 | 9.2 | 9.3 | |||||||||
Maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services |
64.8 | 64.3 | 59.8 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||
Software, hardware and supplies |
5.6 | 4.2 | 5.4 | |||||||||
Implementation and training services |
4.2 | 4.1 | 4.2 | |||||||||
Total cost of system sales |
9.8 | 8.3 | 9.6 | |||||||||
Maintenance |
3.7 | 4.6 | 4.8 | |||||||||
Electronic data interchange services |
7.8 | 8.7 | 8.7 | |||||||||
Revenue cycle management and related services |
9.6 | 9.5 | 6.0 | |||||||||
Other services |
5.2 | 7.0 | 7.1 | |||||||||
Total cost of maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services |
26.2 | 29.7 | 26.6 | |||||||||
Total cost of revenue |
36.1 | 38.0 | 36.2 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
63.9 | 62.0 | 63.8 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
30.7 | 29.8 | 28.3 | |||||||||
Research and development costs |
6.2 | 5.7 | 5.6 | |||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
0.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
37.3 | 36.1 | 34.3 | |||||||||
Income from operations |
26.6 | 25.9 | 29.5 | |||||||||
Interest income |
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
0.0 | 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
26.7 | 26.1 | 29.9 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
9.3 | 9.5 | 11.1 | |||||||||
Net income |
17.4 | % | 16.6 | % | 18.8 | % | ||||||
31
Table of Contents
Comparison of the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010
During fiscal year 2010, we strengthened our position in the hospital market with the acquisitions
of Opus on February 10, 2010 and NextGen IS on August 12, 2009. The results of operations for the
Opus and NextGen IS acquisitions as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 2010 were included with the NextGen Division. During fiscal year 2011, as a result of
certain organization changes, the composition of the Companys NextGen Division was revised to
exclude Opus and NextGen IS, both of which are now aggregated in the Companys Inpatient Solutions
Division. The Company now operates four reportable segments (not including Corporate), comprised
of the NextGen Division, the Inpatient Solutions Division, the QSI Dental Division and the Practice
Solutions Division.
For the purposes of the comparison of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 in
this MD&A, the segment results in the tables therein for the year ended March 31, 2010 are
re-casted to present four reportable segments. However, since NextGen IS had no material
operations during fiscal year 2010 and Opus was acquired at the end of fiscal year 2010, a
comparative analysis of the results of the Inpatient Solutions Division is not deemed meaningful
and is not presented therein.
Net Income. The Companys net income for the year ended March 31, 2011 was $61.6 million, or $2.13
per share on a basic and $2.12 per share on a fully diluted basis. In comparison, we earned $48.4
million, or $1.69 per share on a basic and $1.68 per share on a fully diluted basis for the year
ended March 31, 2010. The increase in net income for the year ended March 31, 2011 was primarily
attributed to the following:
| a 21.1% increase in consolidated revenue, including an increase in revenues of $37.8 million from our NextGen Division, $15.0 million from our Inpatient Solutions Division and $5.9 million from our Practice Solutions Division; | ||
| a 16.5% increase in NextGen Division revenue, which accounted for 75.4% of consolidated revenue; | ||
| an increase of recurring revenue, including RCM, maintenance and EDI revenue, which accounted for 55.5% of total consolidated revenue; | ||
| offset by an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development costs. |
Revenue. Revenue for the year ended March 31, 2011 increased 21.1% to $353.4 million from $291.8
million for the year ended March 31, 2010. NextGen Division revenue increased 16.5% to $266.5
million from $228.7 million in the year ended March 31, 2010 while QSI Dental Division revenue
increased 16.6% to $20.0 million from $17.1 million and Practice Solutions Division revenue
increased 13.7% during that same period to $49.0 million from $43.1 million.
System Sales. Revenue earned from Company-wide sales of systems for the year ended March 31, 2011
increased 19.6% to $124.5 million from $104.1 million in the prior year period.
Our increase in revenue from sales of systems was principally the result of a 12.6% increase in
category revenue at our NextGen Division, whose sales in this category grew to $108.9 million
during the year ended March 31, 2011 from $96.7 million during the same prior year period. This
increase was driven by higher sales of software to both new and existing clients, as well as
increases in hardware and third-party software and implementation and training services revenue.
The following table breaks down our reported system sales into software, hardware, third-party
software, supplies and implementation and training services components on a consolidated and
divisional basis for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
Hardware, Third | Implementation | |||||||||||||||
Party Software | and Training | Total System | ||||||||||||||
Software | and Supplies | Services | Sales | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
$ | 3,239 | $ | 2,190 | $ | 1,066 | $ | 6,495 | ||||||||
NextGen Division |
84,812 | 8,979 | 15,097 | 108,888 | ||||||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
6,187 | 612 | 1,482 | 8,281 | ||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
473 | 22 | 370 | 865 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 94,711 | $ | 11,803 | $ | 18,015 | $ | 124,529 | ||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
$ | 1,699 | $ | 1,409 | $ | 825 | $ | 3,933 | ||||||||
NextGen Division |
78,703 | 4,931 | 13,058 | 96,692 | ||||||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
1,129 | 13 | 226 | 1,368 | ||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
1,877 | | 267 | 2,144 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 83,408 | $ | 6,353 | $ | 14,376 | $ | 104,137 | ||||||||
32
Table of Contents
NextGen Division software license revenue increased 7.8% in the year ended March 31, 2011 versus
the same period last year. The Divisions software revenue accounted for 77.9% of divisional
system sales revenue during the year ended March 31, 2011, compared to 81.4% during the same period
a year ago. The September 2010 announcement that NextGenehr became CCHIT® certified
along with the finalization of the Stage 1 Meaningful Use definition criteria under the ARRA in
July 2010 positively impacted the growth in software license revenue during the year ended March
31, 2011. Software license revenue continues to be an area of primary emphasis for the NextGen
Division.
During the year ended March 31, 2011, 8.2% of the NextGen Divisions system sales revenue was
represented by hardware and third-party software compared to 5.1% during same period a year ago.
The number of clients who purchase hardware and third-party software and the dollar amount of
hardware and third-party software revenue fluctuates each quarter depending on the needs of
clients. The inclusion of hardware and third-party software in the Divisions sales arrangements
is typically at the request of our clients.
Implementation and training revenue related to system sales at the NextGen Division increased 15.6%
in the year ended March 31, 2011 compared to the prior year period. The amount of implementation
and training services revenue is dependent on several factors, including timing of client
implementations, the availability of qualified staff and the mix of services being rendered. The
number of implementation and training staff increased during the year ended March 31, 2011 versus
the same prior year period in order to accommodate the increased amount of implementation services
sold in conjunction with increased software sales. In order to achieve growth in this area,
additional staffing increases and additional training facilities are anticipated, though actual
future increases in revenue and staff will depend upon the availability of qualified staff,
business mix and conditions and our ability to retain current staff members.
For the QSI Dental Division, total system sales increased $2.6 million, or 65.1%, to $6.5 million
in the year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $3.9 million in the prior year period. Systems
sales in the QSI Dental Division were positively impacted by greater joint sales of dental and
medical software to FQHCs. In addition, the Division began selling the SaaS based NextDDS product
during fiscal year 2010.
For the Practice Solutions Division, total system sales decreased by 59.7% in the year ended March
31, 2011 as compared to the prior year period. Systems sales revenue within the Practice Solutions
Division is composed of sales to existing RCM clients only and can fluctuate given the size of the
current client base of the Practice Solutions Division.
For the Inpatient Solutions Division, total systems sales increased $6.9 million because only two
months of revenue was recorded in the year ended March 31, 2010 for Opus, which was acquired in
February 2010, as compared to a full year of revenue for the year ended March 31, 2011.
Maintenance, EDI, RCM and Other Services. For the year ended March 31, 2011, Company-wide revenue
from maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services grew 21.9% to $228.8 million from $187.7 million in
the prior year period. The increase is primarily due to an increase in maintenance, EDI and other
services revenue from the NextGen Division and RCM revenue from the Practice Solutions Division.
Total NextGen Division maintenance revenue for the year ended March 31, 2011 grew 16.7% to $93.9
million from $80.5 million for the same prior year period while NextGen Division EDI revenue grew
20.4% to $36.1 million compared to $30.0 million in the prior year period. Other services revenue
for the NextGen Division, which consists primarily of third-party annual software license renewals,
follow-on training hours and hosting services, increased 28.0% to $27.6 million in the year ended
March 31, 2011 from $21.6 million in the same prior year period. QSI Dental Division maintenance,
EDI and other revenue for the year ended March 31, 2011 increased $0.3 million to $13.5 million
compared to $13.2 million for the same prior year period. For the year ended March 31, 2011, RCM
revenue grew $8.4 million to $45.1 million compared to $36.7 million in the prior year period
primarily as a result of increases in RCM revenue to new and existing clients.
The following table details maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services revenue by category on a
consolidated and divisional basis for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
Maintenance | EDI | RCM | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
$ | 7,329 | $ | 4,891 | $ | | $ | 1,251 | $ | 13,471 | ||||||||||
NextGen Division |
93,890 | 36,131 | | 27,637 | 157,658 | |||||||||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
8,642 | | | 975 | 9,617 | |||||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
158 | | 45,065 | 2,865 | 48,088 | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 110,019 | $ | 41,022 | $ | 45,065 | $ | 32,728 | $ | 228,834 | ||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
$ | 7,217 | $ | 5,038 | $ | | $ | 940 | $ | 13,195 | ||||||||||
NextGen Division |
80,451 | 29,997 | | 21,589 | 132,037 | |||||||||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
1,416 | | | 108 | 1,524 | |||||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
108 | | 36,665 | 4,145 | 40,918 | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 89,192 | $ | 35,035 | $ | 36,665 | $ | 26,782 | $ | 187,674 | ||||||||||
33
Table of Contents
Maintenance revenue for the NextGen Division increased by $13.4 million for the year ended March
31, 2011 as compared to the same prior year period. The growth in maintenance revenue is a result
of an $11.5 million increase in net additional licenses from new clients and existing clients and
approximately $1.9 million related to a recent price increase that became effective during the
quarter ended September 30, 2010.
The NextGen Divisions EDI revenue growth has come from new clients and from further penetration of
the Divisions existing client base while the growth in RCM revenue has come from new clients that
have been acquired from cross selling opportunities with the NextGen Division client base. We
intend to continue to promote maintenance, EDI and RCM services to both new and existing clients.
Growth in other services revenue is primarily due to increases in third-party annual software
licenses, consulting services and hosting services revenue.
For the Inpatient Solutions Division, maintenance revenue increased $7.2 million because only two
months of revenue was recorded in the year ended March 31, 2010 for Opus, which was acquired in
February 2010, as compared to a full year of revenue for the year ended March 31, 2011.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue for the year ended March 31, 2011 increased 15.0% to $127.5
million from $110.8 million in the prior year period and the cost of revenue as a percentage of
revenue decreased to 36.1% from 38.0% due to the fact that the rate of growth in cost of revenue
grew slower than the aggregate revenue growth rate for the Company.
The following table details revenue and cost of revenue on a consolidated and divisional basis for
the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | % | 2010 | % | |||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 19,966 | 100.0 | % | $ | 17,128 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
9,034 | 45.2 | % | 7,788 | 45.5 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 10,932 | 54.8 | % | $ | 9,340 | 54.5 | % | ||||||||
NextGen Division |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 266,546 | 100.0 | % | $ | 228,730 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
78,496 | 29.4 | % | 73,122 | 32.0 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 188,050 | 70.6 | % | $ | 155,608 | 68.0 | % | ||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 17,898 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,891 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
4,671 | 26.1 | % | 412 | 14.3 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 13,227 | 73.9 | % | $ | 2,479 | 85.7 | % | ||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 48,953 | 100.0 | % | $ | 43,062 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
34,896 | 71.3 | % | 29,485 | 68.5 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 14,057 | 28.7 | % | $ | 13,577 | 31.5 | % | ||||||||
Unallocated
cost of revenue (1) |
$ | 385 | N/A | $ | | N/A | ||||||||||
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 353,363 | 100.0 | % | $ | 291,811 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
127,482 | 36.1 | % | 110,807 | 38.0 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 225,881 | 63.9 | % | $ | 181,004 | 62.0 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Relates to the amortization of software technology intangible assets acquired from the purchases of NextGen IS and Opus. |
Gross profit margins at the QSI Dental Division for the year ended March 31, 2011 increased
slightly to 54.8% from 54.5% for the prior year period. Gross profit margins at the NextGen
Division for year ended March 31, 2011 increased to 70.6% compared to 68.0% for the prior year
period due to strong software sales and an increase in maintenance revenue, which yields higher
margins than other services, along with improvements in EDI margins. Gross margin in the Practice
Solutions Division decreased to 28.7% for the year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to 31.5%for the
prior year period because of higher outsourcing costs in connection with delivering RCM services in
the year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period a year ago.
34
Table of Contents
The following table details the individual components of cost of revenue and gross profit as a
percentage of total revenue on a consolidated and divisional basis for the years ended March 31,
2011 and 2010:
Hardware, | Payroll and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Third Party | Related | Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Software | Benefits | EDI | Other | of Revenue | Gross Profit | |||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
8.7 | % | 17.7 | % | 11.6 | % | 7.2 | % | 45.2 | % | 54.8 | % | ||||||||||||
NextGen Division |
2.9 | % | 11.8 | % | 8.1 | % | 6.6 | % | 29.4 | % | 70.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
5.4 | % | 16.7 | % | 0.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 26.1 | % | 73.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
0.0 | % | 43.8 | % | 0.5 | % | 27.0 | % | 71.3 | % | 28.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
3.0 | % | 16.8 | % | 6.9 | % | 9.4 | % | 36.1 | % | 63.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
8.5 | % | 13.8 | % | 16.0 | % | 7.2 | % | 45.5 | % | 54.5 | % | ||||||||||||
NextGen Division |
2.5 | % | 13.4 | % | 9.6 | % | 6.5 | % | 32.0 | % | 68.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
3.1 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 11.2 | % | 14.3 | % | 85.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
0.5 | % | 43.6 | % | 1.1 | % | 23.3 | % | 68.5 | % | 31.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
2.5 | % | 17.7 | % | 8.7 | % | 9.1 | % | 38.0 | % | 62.0 | % | ||||||||||||
During the year ended March 31, 2011, hardware and third-party software constituted a higher
portion of cost of revenue compared to the prior year period in the NextGen Division. The number
of clients who purchase hardware and third-party software and the dollar amount of hardware and
third-party software purchased fluctuates each quarter depending on the needs of our clients.
Our payroll and benefits expense associated with delivering our products and services decreased to
16.8% of consolidated revenue in the year ended March 31, 2011 compared to 17.7% during the same
period last year. The absolute level of consolidated payroll and benefit expenses grew from $51.8
million in the year ended March 31, 2010 to $59.3 million in the year ended March 31, 2011, an
increase of 14.7%, or approximately $7.5 million. Of the $7.5 million increase, approximately $2.7
million of the increase is related to the Practice Solutions Division because RCM is a service
business, which inherently has higher percentage of payroll costs as a percentage of revenue.
Increases of $1.2 million in the QSI Dental Division and $0.7 million in the NextGen Division for
the year ended March 31, 2011 are primarily due to headcount additions and increased headcount and
payroll and benefits expense associated with delivering products and services. For the Inpatient
Solutions Division, payroll and benefits expense associated with delivering our products and
services increased $2.9 million because fiscal year 2010 included only two months of payroll and
benefits expenses for Opus, which was acquired in February 2010, as compared to a full year of
expenses for the year ended March 31, 2011. The amount of share-based compensation expense
included in cost of revenue was $0.3 million and $0.1 million for years ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively.
Other expense, which primarily consists of third-party annual license, hosting costs and
outsourcing costs, increased to 9.4% of total revenue during the year ended March 31, 2011 as
compared to 9.1% for the same period a year ago. Contributing to this increase was higher
outsources costs in delivering RCM services offset by better profit margins achieved in our hosting
and annual licenses revenues that are included in other services.
As a result of the foregoing events and activities, the gross profit percentage for the Company
increased to 63.9% for the year ended March 31, 2011 versus 62.0% for the prior year period.
We anticipate continued additions to headcount in all of our Divisions in areas related to
delivering products and services in future periods, but due to the uncertainties in the timing of
our sales arrangements, our sales mix, the acquisition and training of qualified personnel and
other issues, we cannot accurately predict if related headcount expense as a percentage of revenue
will increase or decrease in the future.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the
year ended March 31, 2011 increased 24.6% to $108.3 million as compared to $87.0 million for the
prior year period. The increase in these expenses resulted primarily from:
| $18.7 million increase in salaries and related benefit expenses primarily as a result of headcount additions; | ||
| $4.6 million increase due to a full year of selling and administrative expenses from Opus, which was acquired in February 2010; | ||
| $3.2 million increase in sales commissions primarily related to the NextGen Division; | ||
| $1.4 million increase primarily due to fair value adjustments to the contingent consideration liability related to the acquisitions of Opus and NextGen IS; offset by | ||
| $1.6 million decrease in legal and outside services expenses; | ||
| $2.1 million net decrease in advertising, tradeshows and travel related expenses; and | ||
| $2.8 million net decrease in other selling and administrative expenses. |
35
Table of Contents
Share-based compensation expense was approximately $3.3 million and $1.9 million for the years
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and is included in the aforementioned amounts.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue increased from 29.8% in the
year ended March 31, 2010 to 30.7% in the year ended March 31, 2011.
We do not anticipate significant increases in expenditures for trade shows, advertising and the
employment of additional sales and administrative staff at the NextGen Division until additional
revenue growth is achieved. We anticipate future increases in corporate expenditures being made in
a wide range of areas including professional services and investment in a companywide enterprise
resource planning (ERP) system. While we expect selling, general and administrative expenses to
increase on an absolute basis, we cannot accurately predict the impact these additional
expenditures will have on selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue.
Research and Development Costs. Research and development costs for the years ended March 31, 2011
and 2010 were $21.8 million and $16.5 million, respectively. The increases in research and
development expenses were due in part to increased investment in the NextGen Division product line.
The Opus acquisition added $1.4 million in research and development expenses during the year ended
March 31, 2011. Additions to capitalized software costs offset increases in research and
development costs. For the year ended March 31, 2011, our additions to capitalized software
increased to $10.7 million compared to $7.9 million capitalized during the same prior year period
as we continue to enhance our software to meet the Meaningful Use definitions under the ARRA.
Research and development costs as a percentage of revenue increased to 6.2% in the year ended March
31, 2011 from 5.7% for the same prior year period. Research and development expenses are expected
to continue at or above current dollar levels as the Company is developing a new integrated inpatient and outpatient, web-based software platform. Share-based compensation expense included in
research and development costs, net of amounts capitalized as software development, was $0.2
million and $0.1 million for years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets. Amortization in operating expense related to acquired
intangible assets for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $1.7 million and $1.8 million,
respectively.
Interest and Other Income. Total interest and other income for the years ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 were $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Interest and other income consist primarily
of dividends and interest earned on our investments.
Our investment policy is determined by our Board of Directors. We currently maintain our cash in
very liquid short term assets including tax exempt and taxable money market funds and short-term
U.S. Treasury securities with maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase. Our Board of
Directors continues to review alternate uses for our cash including, but not limited to, payment of
a special dividend, initiation of a stock buyback program, an expansion of our investment policy to
include investments with longer maturities of greater than 90 days, and other items. Additionally,
it is possible that we will utilize some or all of our cash to fund acquisitions or other similar
business activities. Any or all of these programs could significantly impact our investment income
in future periods.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the years ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 were $32.8 million and $27.8 million, respectively. The effective tax rates were 34.8% and
36.5% for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective rate for the year
ended March 31, 2011 decreased as compared to the prior year period primarily due to increased
benefits from the qualified production activities deduction and research and development credits
and fluctuations in the state effective tax rate.
During the year ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we recognized research and development tax credits
of approximately $1.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The Company also claimed the
qualified production activities deduction under Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of
approximately $8.1 million and $4.1 million during the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Research and development credits and the qualified production activities income
deduction calculated by us involve certain assumptions and judgments regarding qualification of
expenses under the relevant tax code provision.
36
Table of Contents
Comparison of the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009
Prior to fiscal year 2010, the Company had no material operations in the inpatient solutions area.
For the purposes of the comparison of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 in
this MD&A, the segment results in the tables and comparative analysis therein for the year ended
March 31, 2010 are not re-casted to reflect the change in reportable segments established during
fiscal year 2011. Refer to the comparison of fiscal years ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010
in this MD&A for re-casted reportable segment results for the year ended March 31, 2010.
Net Income. The Companys net income for the year ended March 31, 2010 was $48.4 million or $1.69
per share on a basic and $1.68 per share on a fully diluted basis. In comparison, we earned $46.1
million or $1.65 per share on a basic and $1.62 per share on a fully diluted basis for the year
ended March 31, 2009. The increase in net income for the year ended March 31, 2010 was primarily
attributed to the following:
| an 18.9% increase in consolidated revenue, including an increase of $27.7 million in revenue from our NextGen Division and an increase of $17.4 million in revenue from our Practice Solutions Division; | ||
| a 13.6% increase in NextGen Division revenue, which accounted for 79.4% of consolidated revenue; | ||
| an increase of recurring revenue, including RCM, maintenance and EDI revenue, offset by a decline in our gross profit margin due primarily to both a shift in revenue mix with increased RCM revenue and lower gross margins related to RCM revenue; | ||
| an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue related to higher selling and corporate expenses; and | ||
| a decrease in interest income primarily due significantly lower interest rates, as compared to the prior year, on money market accounts in which we invest a majority of our cash. |
Revenue. Revenue for the year ended March 31, 2010 increased 18.9% to $291.8 million from $245.5
million for the year ended March 31, 2009. NextGen Division revenue increased 13.6% to $231.6
million from $204.0 million in the year ended March 31, 2009 while QSI Dental Division revenue
increased 8.1% during that same period to $17.1 million from $15.9 million and Practice Solutions
Division revenue increased 67.5% during that same period to $43.1 million from $25.7 million.
Practice Solutions Division revenue was impacted positively in fiscal year 2010 as a result of
including a full year of results versus approximately ten and five months of results for HSI and
PMP, respectively, in fiscal year 2009.
System Sales. Revenue earned from Company-wide sales of systems for the year ended March 31, 2010
increased 5.4% to $104.1 million from $98.8 million in the prior year period.
Our increase in revenue from sales of systems was principally the result of a 5.1% increase in
category revenue at our NextGen Division, whose sales in this category grew to $98.1 million during
the year ended March 31, 2010 from $93.3 million during the same prior year period. This increase
was driven by higher sales of ambulatory practice management and health records software to both
new and existing clients, as well as increases in revenue related to implementation and training
services.
The following table breaks down our reported system sales into software, hardware, third-party
software, supplies and implementation and training services components on a consolidated and
divisional basis for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
Hardware, Third | Implementation | |||||||||||||||
Party Software | and Training | Total System | ||||||||||||||
Software | and Supplies | Services | Sales | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
$ | 1,699 | $ | 1,409 | $ | 825 | $ | 3,933 | ||||||||
NextGen Division |
79,832 | 4,944 | 13,284 | 98,060 | ||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
1,877 | | 267 | 2,144 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 83,408 | $ | 6,353 | $ | 14,376 | $ | 104,137 | ||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
$ | 915 | $ | 1,171 | $ | 938 | $ | 3,024 | ||||||||
NextGen Division |
74,128 | 6,775 | 12,437 | 93,340 | ||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
2,397 | | | 2,397 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 77,440 | $ | 7,946 | $ | 13,375 | $ | 98,761 | ||||||||
37
Table of Contents
NextGen Division software license revenue increased 7.7% in the year ended March 31, 2010 versus
the same period last year. The Divisions software revenue accounted for 81.4% of divisional
system sales revenue during the year ended March 31, 2010, compared to 79.4% during the same period
a year ago. Software license revenue continues to be an area of primary emphasis for the NextGen
Division. The Opus acquisition, which closed in February 2010, contributed approximately $0.9
million to the NextGen Divisions software license revenue during the year ended March 31, 2010.
During the year ended March 31, 2010, 5.0% of the NextGen Divisions system sales revenue was
represented by hardware and third-party software compared to 7.3% during same period a year ago.
The number of clients who purchase hardware and third-party software and the dollar amount of
hardware and third-party software revenue fluctuates each quarter depending on the needs of
clients. The inclusion of hardware and third-party software in the Divisions sales arrangements
is typically at the request of our clients.
Implementation and training revenue related to system sales at the NextGen Division increased 6.8%
in the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to the prior year period. The amount of implementation
and training services revenue is dependent on several factors, including timing of client
implementations, the availability of qualified staff and the mix of services being rendered. The
number of implementation and training staff increased during the year ended March 31, 2010 versus
the same prior year period in order to accommodate the increased amount of implementation services
sold in conjunction with increased software sales. In order to achieve growth in this area,
additional staffing increases and additional training facilities are anticipated, though actual
future increases in revenue and staff will depend upon the availability of qualified staff,
business mix and conditions and our ability to retain current staff members.
For the QSI Dental Division, total system sales increased $0.9 million, or 30.1%, to $3.9 million
in the year ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $3.0 million in the prior year period. Systems
sales in the QSI Dental Division were positively impacted by greater joint sales of dental and
medical software to FQHCs. In addition, the Division began selling the SaaS based NextDDS product
during the year ended March 31, 2010.
For the Practice Solutions Division, total system sales decreased $0.3 million, or 10.6%, to $2.1
million in the year ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $2.4 million in the prior year period.
Systems sales revenue within the Practice Solutions Division is composed of sales to existing RCM
clients only and can fluctuate given the size of the current client base of the Practice Solutions
Division.
Maintenance, EDI, RCM and Other Services. For the year ended March 31, 2010, Company-wide revenue
from maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services grew 27.9% to $187.7 million from $146.8 million in
the prior year period. The increase is primarily due to an increase in maintenance, EDI and other
services revenue from the NextGen Division and RCM revenue from the Practice Solutions Division.
Total NextGen Division maintenance revenue for the year ended March 31, 2010 grew 24.9% to $81.9
million from $65.6 million for the same prior year period while NextGen Division EDI revenue grew
21.2% to $30.0 million compared to $24.8 million in the prior year period. Other services revenue
for the NextGen Division, which consists primarily of third-party annual software license renewals,
follow-on training hours, consulting services and hosting services, increased 6.9% to $21.7 million
in the year ended March 31, 2010 from $20.3 million in the same prior year period. For the year
ended March 31, 2010, RCM revenue grew $15.3 million to $36.7 million compared to $21.4 million in
the prior year period. QSI Dental Division maintenance, EDI and other revenue increased 2.9% to
$13.2 million in the year ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $12.8 million in the prior year
period.
The following table details maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services revenue by category on a
consolidated and divisional basis for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
Maintenance | EDI | RCM | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
$ | 7,217 | $ | 5,038 | $ | | $ | 940 | $ | 13,195 | ||||||||||
NextGen Division |
81,867 | 29,997 | | 21,697 | 133,561 | |||||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
108 | | 36,665 | 4,145 | 40,918 | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 89,192 | $ | 35,035 | $ | 36,665 | $ | 26,782 | $ | 187,674 | ||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
$ | 7,167 | $ | 4,766 | $ | | $ | 894 | $ | 12,827 | ||||||||||
NextGen Division |
65,559 | 24,756 | | 20,299 | 110,614 | |||||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
136 | | 21,431 | 1,746 | 23,313 | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 72,862 | $ | 29,522 | $ | 21,431 | $ | 22,939 | $ | 146,754 | ||||||||||
Maintenance revenue for the NextGen Division increased by $16.3 million for the year ended March
31, 2010 as compared to the same prior year period. The growth in maintenance revenue is a result
of a $15.1 million increase in net additional licenses from new clients and existing clients and
$1.2 million in maintenance revenue related to the Opus acquisition.
38
Table of Contents
The NextGen Divisions EDI revenue growth has come from new clients and from further penetration of
the Divisions existing client base while the growth in RCM revenue has come from new clients that
have been acquired from cross selling opportunities with the NextGen Division client base. We
intend to continue to promote maintenance, EDI and RCM services to both new and existing clients.
Growth in other services revenue is primarily due to increases in third-party annual software
licenses, consulting services and hosting services revenue.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue for the year ended March 31, 2010 increased 24.7% to $110.8
million from $88.9 million in the prior year period and the cost of revenue as a percentage of
revenue increased to 38.0% from 36.2% due to the fact that the rate of growth in cost of revenue
grew faster than the aggregate revenue growth rate for the Company.
The following table details revenue and cost of revenue on a consolidated and divisional basis for
the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | % | 2009 | % | |||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 17,128 | 100.0 | % | $ | 15,851 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
7,788 | 45.5 | % | 7,582 | 47.8 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 9,340 | 54.5 | % | $ | 8,269 | 52.2 | % | ||||||||
NextGen Division |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 231,621 | 100.0 | % | $ | 203,954 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
73,534 | 31.7 | % | 65,311 | 32.0 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 158,087 | 68.3 | % | $ | 138,643 | 68.0 | % | ||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 43,062 | 100.0 | % | $ | 25,710 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
29,485 | 68.5 | % | 15,997 | 62.2 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 13,577 | 31.5 | % | $ | 9,713 | 37.8 | % | ||||||||
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 291,811 | 100.0 | % | $ | 245,515 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
110,807 | 38.0 | % | 88,890 | 36.2 | % | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 181,004 | 62.0 | % | $ | 156,625 | 63.8 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit margins at the QSI Dental Division for the year ended March 31, 2010 increased to
54.5% from 52.2% for the prior year period primarily as a result of lower payroll and related
benefits in system sales during the year ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period a year
ago. Gross profit margins at the NextGen Division for year ended March 31, 2010 increased slightly
to 68.3% from 68.0% for the prior year period primarily as a result of a lower amount of hardware
revenue. Gross margin in the Practice Solutions Division declined as a result of a smaller
proportion of software revenue included in revenue versus the prior year as well as costs related
to transitioning to the NextGen platform and other ramp-up costs.
39
Table of Contents
The following table details the individual components of cost of revenue and gross profit as a
percentage of total revenue on a consolidated and divisional basis for the years ended March 31,
2010 and 2009:
Hardware, | Payroll and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Third Party | Related | Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Software | Benefits | EDI | Other | of Revenue | Gross Profit | |||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
8.5 | % | 13.8 | % | 16.0 | % | 7.2 | % | 45.5 | % | 54.5 | % | ||||||||||||
NextGen Division |
2.5 | % | 13.4 | % | 9.6 | % | 6.2 | % | 31.7 | % | 68.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
0.5 | % | 43.6 | % | 1.1 | % | 23.3 | % | 68.5 | % | 31.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
2.5 | % | 17.7 | % | 8.7 | % | 9.1 | % | 38.0 | % | 62.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
7.6 | % | 19.8 | % | 17.1 | % | 3.3 | % | 47.8 | % | 52.2 | % | ||||||||||||
NextGen Division |
3.9 | % | 11.0 | % | 9.1 | % | 8.0 | % | 32.0 | % | 68.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
0.2 | % | 45.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 17.0 | % | 62.2 | % | 37.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
3.7 | % | 15.1 | % | 8.4 | % | 9.0 | % | 36.2 | % | 63.8 | % | ||||||||||||
The increase in our consolidated cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue between the year ended
March 31, 2010 and the prior year period is primarily attributable to an increase in RCM revenue,
which carries higher payroll and related benefits as a percentage of revenue and higher
consolidated EDI costs, offset by a decrease in hardware and third party software as a percentage
of revenue. Other expense, which primarily consists of third-party annual license and hosting
costs, increased slightly to 9.1% of total revenue during the year ended March 31, 2010 as compared
to 9.0% for the same period a year ago.
During the year ended March 31, 2010, hardware and third-party software constituted a smaller
portion of cost of revenue compared to the prior year period in the NextGen Division. The number
of clients who purchase hardware and third-party software and the dollar amount of hardware and
third-party software purchased fluctuates each quarter depending on the needs of our clients.
Our payroll and benefits expense associated with delivering our products and services increased to
17.7% of consolidated revenue in the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to 15.1% during the same
period last year primarily due to inclusion of a full year of HSI and PMP transactions in fiscal
year 2010 versus a partial period in fiscal year 2009. RCM is a service business, which inherently
has higher percentage of payroll costs as a percentage of revenue.
The absolute level of consolidated payroll and benefit expenses grew from $37.1 million in the year
ended March 31, 2009 to $51.8 million in the year ended March 31, 2010, an increase of 39.4% or
approximately $14.6 million. Of the $14.6 million increase, approximately $7.2 million of the
increase is related to the Practice Solutions Division, which included a full year of HSI and PMP
expenses during fiscal year 2010 versus approximately ten and five months of respective expense in
fiscal year 2009. For the NextGen Division, a decrease of approximately $8.2 million was related
to decreased headcount and payroll and benefits expense associated with delivering products and
services. Payroll and benefits expense associated with delivering products and services in the QSI
Dental Division decreased $0.7 million from $3.1 million in the year ended March 31, 2009 to $2.4
million in the year ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to headcount additions. The amount of
share-based compensation expense included in cost of revenue was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for
years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
As a result of the foregoing events and activities, the gross profit percentage for the Company
decreased to 62.0% for the year ended March 31, 2010 versus 63.8% for the prior year period.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the
year ended March 31, 2010 increased 25.3% to $87.0 million as compared to $69.4 million for the
prior year period. The increase in these expenses resulted primarily from:
| $9.9 million increase in salaries and related expenses in the NextGen Division primarily as a result of headcount additions; | ||
| $2.5 million increase in marketing and trade shows in the NextGen Division; | ||
| $1.5 million increase from the acquisition of NextGen IS and Opus; | ||
| $3.3 million increase in corporate related expenses, primarily as a result of headcount additions and | ||
| $0.4 million increase in other selling and administrative expenses. |
Share-based compensation expense was approximately $1.9 million and $1.5 million for the years
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and is included in the aforementioned amounts.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue increased from 28.3% in the
year ended March 31, 2009 to 29.8% in the year ended March 31, 2010.
40
Table of Contents
Research and Development Costs. Research and development costs for the years ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 were $16.5 million and $13.8 million, respectively. The increases in research and
development expenses were due in part to increased investment in the NextGen Division product line.
Additions to capitalized software costs offset increases in research and development costs. For
the year ended March 31, 2010, our additions to capitalized software increased to $7.9 million
compared to $5.9 million capitalized during the same prior year period. Research and development
costs as a percentage of revenue increased to 5.7% in the year ended March 31, 2010 from 5.6% for
the same prior year period. Share-based compensation expense included in research and development
costs, net of amounts capitalized as software development, was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for
years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets. Amortization in operating expense related to acquired
intangible assets for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $1.8 million and $1.0 million,
respectively. The increase in amortization expense is primarily due to the addition of customer
relationships and software technology intangible assets, which were acquired through the
acquisitions of Opus and NextGen IS during fiscal year 2010.
Interest Income. Interest income for the year ended March 31, 2010 decreased to $0.2 million
compared to $1.2 million in the prior year period primarily due to significantly lower interest
rates received on the Companys cash investments, which are primarily in institutional money market
accounts. Short term interest rates were at historic lows for most of the year ended March 31,
2010.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) for the year ended March 31, 2010 consists of gains
and losses in fair value recorded on our auction rate securities (ARS) investments as well as on
our ARS put option rights. We recorded an overall gain on our ARS and ARS put option rights of
approximately $0.3 million.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the years ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 were $27.8 million and $27.2 million, respectively. The effective tax rates were 36.5% and
37.1% for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The provision for income taxes
for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 differs from the combined statutory rates primarily due
to the impact of varying state income tax rates, research and development tax credits, the
qualified production activities deduction and exclusions for Company-owned life insurance proceeds
and tax-exempt interest income. The change in the effective rate for the year ended March 31, 2010
includes an increase in the benefit from the qualified production activities deduction and a
decrease in the state income tax expense.
During the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recognized research and development tax credits
of approximately $0.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The Company also claimed the
qualified production activities deduction under Section 199 of the IRC of approximately $4.1
million and $2.7 million during the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Research
and development credits and the qualified production activities income deduction calculated by us
involve certain assumptions and judgments regarding qualification of expenses under the relevant
tax code provision.
41
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table presents selected financial statistics and information for the years ended
March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 116,617 | $ | 84,611 | $ | 70,180 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 32,006 | $ | 14,431 | $ | 11,134 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 61,606 | $ | 48,379 | $ | 46,119 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 70,064 | $ | 55,220 | $ | 48,712 | ||||||
Number of days of sales outstanding |
131 | 125 | 125 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash provided by operations has historically been our primary source of cash and has primarily been
driven by our net income plus adjustments to add back non-cash expenses, including depreciation,
amortization of intangibles and capitalized software costs, provisions for bad debts and inventory
obsolescence, share-based compensation and deferred taxes.
The following table summarizes our consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended March
31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 61,606 | $ | 48,379 | $ | 46,119 | ||||||
Non-cash expenses |
17,978 | 16,152 | 17,720 | |||||||||
Change in deferred revenue |
13,211 | 12,528 | 3,130 | |||||||||
Change in accounts receivable |
(36,094 | ) | (18,944 | ) | (11,369 | ) | ||||||
Change in other assets and liabilities |
13,363 | (2,895 | ) | (6,888 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 70,064 | $ | 55,220 | $ | 48,712 | ||||||
Net Income. As referenced in the above table, net income makes up the majority of our cash
generated from operations for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. The NextGen
Divisions contribution to net income has increased each year due to that Divisions operating
income increasing more quickly than our Company as a whole.
Non-Cash Expenses. Non-cash expenses include depreciation, amortization of intangibles and
capitalized software costs, provisions for bad debts, share-based compensation and deferred taxes.
Total non-cash expenses were $18.0 million, $16.2 million and $17.7 million for the years ended
March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The $1.8 million increase in non-cash expenses for the year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the
prior year period is primarily related to increases of approximately $0.6 million in depreciation,
$1.2 million of amortization of capitalized software costs, $1.5 million of amortization of other
intangibles, $0.3 million in bad debt expense and $1.7 million in share-based compensation, offset
by a $3.4 million decrease in deferred income tax benefit.
The $1.5 million decrease in non-cash expenses for the year ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the
year ended March 31, 2009 is primarily related to decreases of approximately $5.2 million in
deferred income tax benefit and $0.1 million in loss on the disposal of equipment and improvements,
offset by increases of approximately $0.8 million in depreciation, $0.8 million of amortization of
capitalized software costs, $0.7 million of amortization of other intangibles, $1.4 million in bad
debt expense and $0.1 million in share-based compensation.
Deferred Revenue. Cash from operations benefited from increases in deferred revenue primarily due
to an increase in the volume of implementation and maintenance services invoiced by the NextGen
Division which had not yet been rendered or recognized as revenue. Deferred revenue increased by
approximately $13.2 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 versus an increase of $12.5 million
and $3.1 million in the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, resulting in increases
to cash from operations as compared to the prior year periods.
42
Table of Contents
Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable grew by approximately $36.1 million, $18.9 million and
$11.4 million for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in
accounts receivable is due to the following factors:
| NextGen Division revenue grew 16.5%, 12.2% and 19.6% for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively; | ||
| Inpatient Division revenue grew to $17.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $2.9 million for the prior year period primarily because only two months of revenue was recorded in the year ended March 31, 2010 for Opus, which was acquired in February 2010, as compared to a full year of revenue for the year ended March 31, 2011; | ||
| Turnover of accounts receivable is generally slower in the NextGen Division due to the fact that the systems sales related revenue have longer payment terms, generally up to one year, which historically have accounted for a major portion of NextGen Division sales; and | ||
| We experienced an increase in the volume of undelivered services billed in advance by the NextGen Division, which were unpaid as of the end of each period and included in accounts receivable. This resulted in an increase in both deferred revenue and accounts receivable of approximately $16.6 million, $9.5 million and $1.2 million for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
The turnover of accounts receivable measured in terms of days sales outstanding (DSO) increased
from 125 days to 131 days during the year ended March 31, 2011 as compared the prior year period.
The increase in DSO is primarily due to the factors mentioned.
If amounts included in both accounts receivable and deferred revenue were netted, the turnover of
accounts receivable expressed as DSO would be 79 days as of
March 31, 2011 and 2010. Provided turnover of accounts receivable, deferred revenue and profitability remain
consistent with the 2011 fiscal year, we anticipate being able to continue generating cash from
operations during fiscal year 2012 primarily from our net income.
Other Assets and Liabilities. Cash from operations benefited from increases in other liabilities
and decreases in other assets. For the year ended March 31, 2011, the $13.4 million change in
other assets and liabilities consists of a total increase in other liabilities of $14.9 million,
offset by a decrease in other assets of $1.5 million. The $14.9 million increase in other
liabilities consisted of a $1.1 million increase in contingent consideration related to the Opus
and NextGen IS acquisitions, $3.3 million increase in accounts payable and $10.5 million increase
in all other liabilities.
For the year ended March 31, 2010, the $2.9 million change in other assets and liabilities
consisted of a total decrease in other liabilities of $3.3 million, offset by an increase in other
assets of $0.4 million and for the year ended March 31, 2009, the $6.9 million change in other
assets and liabilities consisted of a total decrease in other assets of $7.2 million, offset by an
increase in other liabilities of $0.3 million.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $10.6
million, $13.9 million and $19.4 million, respectively. The decrease of net cash used in investing
activities during the year ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year period is primarily
due to proceeds of $7.7 million received from the sale of our ARS investments, which was offset by
net cash used of $1.1 million for the purchase of marketable securities and $17.2 million for net
additions of equipment and improvements and capitalized software.
During the year ended March 31, 2010, $12.9 million of cash was used for net additions of equipment
and improvements and capitalized software $3.0 million was paid for contingent consideration
related to the acquisition of PMP and $0.6 million was paid for the acquisition of Opus and NextGen
IS. Net cash used for the year ended March 31, 2010 was offset by $2.0 million cash acquired from
the purchase of Opus and $0.4 million proceeds from the sale of marketable securities.
During the year ended March 31, 2009, $25.2 million was paid for the acquisitions of HSI and PMP
and $9.1 million of cash was used for net additions of equipment and improvements and capitalized
software, offset by $14.8 million proceeds from the sale of marketable securities.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the nine years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was
$27.5 million, $26.8 million and $18.1 million, respectively. During the year ended March 31,
2011, we received proceeds of $5.7 million from the exercise of stock options and paid $34.7
million in dividends to shareholders compared to proceeds of $5.9 million from the exercise of
stock options and payment of $34.3 million in dividends to shareholders during the year ended March
31, 2010 and proceeds of $12.5 million from the exercise of stock options, payment of $30.8 million
in dividends to shareholders, and $3.3 million in loan repayments during the year ended March 31,
2009.
We recorded a reduction in our tax benefit from share-based compensation of $1.5 million, $1.6
million and $3.4 million during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
related to excess tax deductions received from stock option exercises. The benefit was recorded as
additional paid in capital.
43
Table of Contents
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
At March 31, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $116.6 million. We intend to expend some of
these funds for the development of products complementary to our existing product line as well as
new versions of certain of our products. These developments are intended to take advantage of more
powerful technologies and to increase the integration of our products. We also intend to expend
some of these funds related to the implementation of a company-wide enterprise resource planning
(ERP) system. We believe the ERP will greatly enhance and streamline our operational processes
and provide a common technology platform to support future growth opportunities. We anticipate
capital expenditures will increase in fiscal year 2012 and will be funded from cash on hand and
cash flows from operations.
In January 2007, our Board of Directors adopted a policy whereby we intend to pay a regular
quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share on our outstanding common stock, subject to further Board
review and approval and establishment of record and distribution dates by our Board of Directors
prior to the declaration of each such quarterly dividend. Our Board of Directors increased the
quarterly dividend to $0.30 per share in August 2008 and to $0.35 per share in January 2011. We
anticipate that future quarterly dividends, if and when declared by our Board of Directors pursuant
to this policy, would likely be distributable on or about the fifth day of each of the months of
October, January, April and July.
On May 25, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.35 per share on
the Companys outstanding shares of common stock, payable to shareholders of record as of June 17,
2011 with an expected distribution date on or about July 5, 2011.
Our Board of Directors declared the following dividends during the periods presented:
Per Share | ||||||||
Declaration Date | Record Date | Payment Date | Dividend | |||||
May 26, 2010 |
June 17, 2010 | July 6, 2010 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
July 28, 2010 |
September 17, 2010 | October 5, 2010 | 0.30 | |||||
October 25, 2010 |
December 17, 2010 | January 5, 2011 | 0.30 | |||||
January 26, 2011 |
March 17, 2011 | April 5, 2011 | 0.35 | |||||
Fiscal year 2011 |
$ | 1.25 | ||||||
May 27, 2009 |
June 12, 2009 | July 6, 2009 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
July 23, 2009 |
September 25, 2009 | October 5, 2009 | 0.30 | |||||
October 28, 2009 |
December 23, 2009 | January 5, 2010 | 0.30 | |||||
January 27, 2010 |
March 23, 2010 | April 5, 2010 | 0.30 | |||||
Fiscal year 2010 |
$ | 1.20 | ||||||
May 29, 2008 |
June 15, 2008 | July 2, 2008 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
August 4, 2008 |
September 15, 2008 | October 1, 2008 | 0.30 | |||||
October 30, 2008 |
December 15, 2008 | January 5, 2009 | 0.30 | |||||
January 28, 2009 |
March 11, 2009 | April 3, 2009 | 0.30 | |||||
Fiscal year 2009 |
$ | 1.15 | ||||||
Management believes that its cash and cash equivalents on hand at March 31, 2011, together with its
marketable securities and cash flows from operations, if any, will be sufficient to meet its
working capital and capital expenditure requirements as well as any dividends to be paid in the
ordinary course of business for the remainder of fiscal year 2012.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations, all of which relate to
operating leases, at March 31, 2011 and the effect that such obligations are expected to have on
our liquidity and cash in future periods:
Year ended March 31, |
||||
2012 |
$ | 5,137 | ||
2013 |
5,475 | |||
2014 |
5,424 | |||
2015 |
5,008 | |||
2016 and beyond |
5,697 | |||
$ | 26,741 | |||
44
Table of Contents
New Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of our notes to consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this Report for a discussion of new accounting
standards.
45
Table of Contents
ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS |
We currently maintain our cash in very liquid short term assets including tax exempt and taxable
money market funds and short-term U.S. Treasury securities with maturities of 90 days or less at
the time of purchase.
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
Our consolidated financial statements identified in the Index to Financial Statements appearing
under Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules of this Report are incorporated herein
by reference to Item 15.
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, respectively) have concluded, based on their evaluation as of March
31, 2011, that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) are effective to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or
submitted by us under the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms,
including to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding whether or not disclosure is required.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision and with the participation
of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Our internal control over financial reporting is supported by written policies and procedures,
that:
(1) | pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; |
(2) | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of our company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and |
(3) | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management of the Company has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2011 in making our assessment of internal control over
financial reporting, management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on
our evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of March 31, 2011.
The effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2011
has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
as stated in their report which appears herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, there were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
46
Table of Contents
PART III
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
The information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy
statement for our 2011 Annual Shareholders Meeting to be filed with the Commission.
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy
statement for our 2011 Annual Shareholders Meeting to be filed with the Commission.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy
statement for our 2011 Annual Shareholders Meeting to be filed with the Commission.
ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy
statement for our 2011 Annual Shareholders Meeting to be filed with the Commission.
ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive proxy
statement for our 2011 Annual Shareholders Meeting to be filed with the Commission.
47
Table of Contents
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Page | ||||
(1) Index to Financial Statements: |
||||
54 | ||||
55 | ||||
56 | ||||
57 | ||||
58 | ||||
60 | ||||
(2) The following supplementary financial statement schedule of Quality Systems, Inc., required to be
included in Item 15(a)(2) on Form 10-K is filed as part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K (this Report). |
||||
84 | ||||
Schedules other than that listed above have been omitted since they are either not
required, not applicable, or because the information required is included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto. |
||||
(3) The exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits hereof are attached hereto or incorporated
herein by reference and filed as a part of this Report. |
||||
85 |
48
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
3.1 | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Quality Systems, Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of California
on September 8, 1989, are hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrants Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-00161) filed January 11, 1996. |
|||
3.2 | Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Quality Systems, Inc. filed with the Secretary of
State of California effective March 4, 2005, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 of the
registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005. |
|||
3.3 | Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Quality Systems, Inc. filed with the Secretary of
State of California effective October 6, 2005 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 of the
registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 11, 2005. |
|||
3.4 | Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Quality Systems, Inc. filed with the Secretary of
State of California effective March 3, 2006 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the
registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 6, 2006. |
|||
3.5 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Quality Systems, Inc., effective October 30, 2008, are hereby incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 31, 2008. |
|||
10.1 | * | Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.1 of the
registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005. |
||
10.2 | * | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan is hereby
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004. |
||
10.3 | * | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan is hereby
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter
ended September 20, 2004. |
||
10.4 | * | 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 5, 2005. |
||
10.5 | * | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 5, 2007. |
||
10.6 | * | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 5, 2007. |
||
10.7 | * | 1993 Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 1994. |
||
10.8 | * | 1998 Employee Stock Contribution Plan is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-63131). |
||
10.9 | * | Form of Second Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive officers is hereby
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February
2, 2010. |
||
10.10 | Lease Agreement between Company and Tower Place, L.P. dated November 15, 2000, commencing February 5, 2001
is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended March 31, 2001. |
|||
10.11 | Fourth Amendment to lease agreement between the Company and Tower Place, L.P. dated September 22, 2005 is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 2006. |
49
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
10.12 | Fifth Amendment to lease agreement between the Company and Tower Place, L.P. dated January 31, 2007 is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 2007. |
|||
10.13 | Lease Agreement between the Company and HUB Properties LLC dated May 8, 2002 is hereby incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003. |
|||
10.14 | Second Amendment to Office Lease agreement between the Company and HUB Properties LLC dated February 14,
2006 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended March 31, 2006. |
|||
10.15 | Amended and Restated Second Amendment to Office Lease agreement between the Company and HUB Properties LLC
dated May 31, 2006 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the registrants Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007. |
|||
10.16 | Lease agreement between the Company and Von Karman Michelson Corporation dated September 6, 2005 is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 2006. |
|||
10.17 | Office lease between the Company and SLTS Grand Avenue, L.P. dated May 3, 2006 is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.20 to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007. |
|||
10.18 | * | Board Service Agreement between the Company and Patrick Cline is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.1
to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2005. |
||
10.19 | * | Director Compensation Program is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K filed February 2, 2010. |
||
10.20 | Settlement Agreement dated as of August 8, 2006 between the registrant and Ahmed Hussein is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2006. |
|||
10.21 | * | Description of Compensation Program for Named Executive Officers for Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2010 is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 1, 2009. |
||
10.22 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated May 16, 2008 by and among Quality Systems, Inc., Bud Merger Sub, LLC and
Lackland Acquisition II, LLC, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the registrants Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008. |
|||
10.23 | Office lease between the Company and Lakeshore Towers Limited Partnership Phase II, a California limited
partnership, dated October 18, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008. |
|||
10.24 | Standard Service Center Lease Agreement between the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Lackland
Acquisition II, LLC, dated November 28, 2001, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the
registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008. |
|||
10.25 | First Amendment to Standard Service Center Lease Agreement between the Lincoln National Life Insurance
Company and Lackland Acquisition II, LLC, dated August 17, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.30 to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008. |
|||
10.26 | Standard Service Center Lease Agreement between the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and InfoNow
Solutions of St. Louis, LLC, dated November 28, 2001, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the
registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008. |
|||
10.27 | Second Amendment to Service Center Lease Agreement between the TM Properties, LLC, successor to the Lincoln
National Life Insurance Company and Lackland Acquisition II, LLC, dated August 17, 2005, is incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008. |
50
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
10.28 | Assignment of Lease between InfoNow Solutions of St. Louis, Lackland Acquisition II, LLC and TM Properties,
LLC dated August 17, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the registrants Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008. |
|||
10.29 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 15, 2008 by and among (i) Quality Systems, Inc. (ii) NextGen
Healthcare Information Systems, Inc. (iii) Ruth Merger Sub, Inc. (iv) Practice Management Partners, Inc. and
(v) certain shareholders set forth therein, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. |
|||
10.30 | First Amendment to Lease Agreement between Hill Management Services, Inc. and Practice Management Partners,
Inc., dated January 15, 2008, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. |
|||
10.31 | First Amendment to Sublease Agreement between RehabCare Group, Inc. and Practice Management Partners Inc.,
dated January 15 2008, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. |
|||
10.32 | Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between Pinecrest LLC and Practice Management Partners, Inc., dated April
30, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2008. |
|||
10.33 | * | Employment Agreement dated August 11, 2008 between Quality Systems, Inc., and Steven Plochocki, is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 12,
2008. |
||
10.34 | * | Outside Directors Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 9, 2010. |
||
10.35 | * | Employment Offer and Terms of Employment dated September 17, 2009, between Quality Systems, Inc. and Philip
N. Kaplan, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on September 21, 2009. |
||
10.36 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 10, 2010, by and among Quality Systems, Inc., OHS Merger Sub,
Inc., Opus Healthcare Solutions, Inc., and the Shareholders of Opus Healthcare Solutions, Inc. |
|||
10.37 | Sixth Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Company and Tower Place, L.P. dated April 1, 2010. |
|||
10.38 | Third Amendment to Office Lease agreement between the Company and HUB Properties LLC dated January 1, 2010. |
|||
10.39 | Fourth Amendment to Office Lease agreement between the Company and HUB Properties LLC dated March 17, 2010. |
|||
10.40 | Third Amendment to Service Center Lease Agreement between the TM Properties, LLC, successor to the Lincoln
National Life Insurance Company and Lackland Acquisition II, LLC, dated March 15, 2010. |
|||
10.41 | Second Amendment to Lease Agreement between Hill Management Services, Inc. and Practice Management Partners,
Inc., dated November 1, 2009. |
|||
10.42 | Modification of Lease #1 between Olen Commercial Realty Corp. and NXG Acute Care LLC, dated October 13, 2009. |
|||
10.43 | Lease between Olen Commercial Realty Corp. and NXG Acurate Care LLC, dated October 1, 2009. |
|||
10.44 | Sublease Agreement between Centex Homes and Opus Healthcare Solutions, Inc., dated February __, 2009. |
|||
21 | ** | List of subsidiaries. |
||
23.1 | ** | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
||
23.2 | ** | Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Grant Thornton LLP. |
51
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
31.1 | ** | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
31.2 | ** | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
32.1 | ** | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
101.INS*** | XBRL Instance |
|||
101.SCH*** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|||
101.CAL*** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation |
|||
101.LAB*** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label |
|||
101.PRE*** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation |
* | This exhibit is a management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement. | |
** | Filed herewith. | |
*** | XBRL information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of section 11 or 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these section. |
52
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
By: | /s/ Steven T. Plochocki | |||
Steven T. Plochocki | ||||
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
By: | /s/ Paul A. Holt | |||
Paul A. Holt | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | ||||
Date: May 27, 2011
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the persons whose signature appears below
hereby constitutes and appoints Steven T. Plochocki and Paul A. Holt, each of them acting
individually, as his attorney-in-fact, each with the full power of substitution, for him in any and
all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorney-in-fact and any
and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been
signed by the following persons on our behalf in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Sheldon Razin
|
Chairman of the Board and Director | May 27, 2011 | ||
/s/ Steven T. Plochocki
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director | May 27, 2011 | ||
/s/ Paul A. Holt
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) and Executive Vice President | May 27, 2011 | ||
/s/ Patrick B. Cline
|
President and Chief Strategy Officer and Director | May 27, 2011 | ||
/s/ Craig Barbarosh
|
Director | May 27, 2011 | ||
/s/ Murray Brennan
|
Director | May 27, 2011 | ||
/s/ George Bristol
|
Director | May 27, 2011 | ||
Director | ||||
/s/ Russell Pflueger
|
Director | May 27, 2011 | ||
/s/ Maureen Spivack
|
Director | May 27, 2011 |
53
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Quality Systems, Inc.,
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item
15(a)(1), present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Quality Systems, Inc.
and its subsidiaries
at March 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for
each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial
statement schedule in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2), presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2011, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is
responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these
financial statement, the financial statement schedules, and on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our integrated audit. We conducted our audits in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits
also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
We also have audited the adjustments to the financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2009
to retrospectively apply the change in reportable segments as described in Note 14. In our opinion,
such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit,
review, or apply any procedures to financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2009 of the
Company other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion
or any other form of assurance on the financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2009 taken
as a whole.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
Orange County, California
May 27, 2011
May 27, 2011
54
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
Quality Systems, Inc.
Quality Systems, Inc.
We have audited, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the change in
operating segment information described in Note 14, the consolidated statements of income,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2009 (the 2009 consolidated
financial statements before the effects of the adjustments discussed in Note 14 are not presented
herein). Our audit of these financial statements included the financial statement Schedule II
listed in the index appearing under Item 15 (a)(2). These 2009 consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the 2009 consolidated financial statements referred to above, which are before the
effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the change in operating segment information
described in Note 14, present fairly, in all material respects, the results of Quality Systems,
Inc.s operations and its cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2009 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the
related financial statement Schedule II, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information
set forth therein.
We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively
apply the change in operating segment information described in Note 14 and accordingly, we do not
express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate
and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by other auditors.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Irvine, California
May 27, 2009
May 27, 2009
55
Table of Contents
QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 116,617 | $ | 84,611 | ||||
Restricted cash |
3,787 | 2,339 | ||||||
Marketable securities |
1,120 | 7,158 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
139,772 | 107,458 | ||||||
Inventories |
1,933 | 1,340 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
| 2,953 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
10,397 | 5,678 | ||||||
Other current assets |
8,768 | 8,684 | ||||||
Total current assets |
282,394 | 220,221 | ||||||
Equipment and improvements, net |
12,599 | 8,432 | ||||||
Capitalized software costs, net |
15,150 | 11,546 | ||||||
Intangibles, net |
16,890 | 20,145 | ||||||
Goodwill |
46,721 | 46,189 | ||||||
Other assets |
4,932 | 3,647 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 378,686 | $ | 310,180 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 6,686 | $ | 3,342 | ||||
Deferred revenue |
76,695 | 64,109 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and related benefits |
10,247 | 8,951 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
3,530 | | ||||||
Dividends payable |
10,162 | 8,664 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
29,316 | 16,220 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
136,636 | 101,286 | ||||||
Deferred revenue, net of current |
1,099 | 474 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
11,384 | 10,859 | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
2,488 | 1,883 | ||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
2,409 | 7,389 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
154,016 | 121,891 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock |
||||||||
$0.01 par value; authorized 50,000 shares; issued
and outstanding 29,034 and 28,879 shares at
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively |
290 | 289 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
133,259 | 122,271 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
91,121 | 65,729 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
224,670 | 188,289 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 378,686 | $ | 310,180 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
56
Table of Contents
QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||
Software, hardware and supplies |
$ | 106,514 | $ | 89,761 | $ | 85,386 | ||||||
Implementation and training services |
18,015 | 14,376 | 13,375 | |||||||||
System sales |
124,529 | 104,137 | 98,761 | |||||||||
Maintenance |
110,019 | 89,192 | 72,862 | |||||||||
Electronic data interchange services |
41,022 | 35,035 | 29,522 | |||||||||
Revenue cycle management and related services |
45,065 | 36,665 | 21,431 | |||||||||
Other services |
32,728 | 26,782 | 22,939 | |||||||||
Maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services |
228,834 | 187,674 | 146,754 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
353,363 | 291,811 | 245,515 | |||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||
Software, hardware and supplies |
19,779 | 12,115 | 13,184 | |||||||||
Implementation and training services |
15,010 | 11,983 | 10,286 | |||||||||
Total cost of system sales |
34,789 | 24,098 | 23,470 | |||||||||
Maintenance |
12,948 | 13,339 | 11,859 | |||||||||
Electronic data interchange services |
27,711 | 25,262 | 21,374 | |||||||||
Revenue cycle management and related services |
33,815 | 27,715 | 14,674 | |||||||||
Other services |
18,219 | 20,393 | 17,513 | |||||||||
Total cost of maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services |
92,693 | 86,709 | 65,420 | |||||||||
Total cost of revenue |
127,482 | 110,807 | 88,890 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
225,881 | 181,004 | 156,625 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
108,310 | 86,951 | 69,410 | |||||||||
Research and development costs |
21,797 | 16,546 | 13,777 | |||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
1,682 | 1,783 | 1,035 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
131,789 | 105,280 | 84,222 | |||||||||
Income from operations |
94,092 | 75,724 | 72,403 | |||||||||
Interest income |
263 | 226 | 1,203 | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
61 | 268 | (279 | ) | ||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
94,416 | 76,218 | 73,327 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
32,810 | 27,839 | 27,208 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 61,606 | $ | 48,379 | $ | 46,119 | ||||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 2.13 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.65 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 2.12 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 1.62 | ||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
28,947 | 28,635 | 28,031 | |||||||||
Diluted |
29,118 | 28,796 | 28,396 | |||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 1.25 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 1.15 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
57
Table of Contents
QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Loss | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
27,448 | $ | 274 | $ | 75,556 | $ | 38,071 | $ | (196 | ) | $ | 113,705 | ||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
697 | 7 | 12,512 | | | 12,519 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit resulting from exercise of stock options |
| | 3,382 | | | 3,382 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 1,977 | | | 1,977 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for acquisitions |
302 | 3 | 10,097 | | | 10,100 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared |
| | | (32,431 | ) | | (32,431 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 46,119 | | 46,119 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of unrealized loss on marketable
securities, net of tax |
| | | | 196 | 196 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
28,447 | 284 | 103,524 | 51,759 | | 155,567 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
238 | 3 | 5,852 | | | 5,855 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit resulting from exercise of stock options |
| | 1,576 | | | 1,576 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 2,073 | | | 2,073 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation related to acquisitions |
| | 433 | | | 433 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for acquisitions |
194 | 2 | 8,813 | | | 8,815 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared |
| | | (34,409 | ) | | (34,409 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 48,379 | | 48,379 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
28,879 | 289 | 122,271 | 65,729 | | 188,289 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
155 | 1 | 5,716 | | | 5,717 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit resulting from exercise of stock options |
| | 1,524 | | | 1,524 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 3,748 | | | 3,748 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared |
| | | (36,214 | ) | | (36,214 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 61,606 | | 61,606 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
29,034 | $ | 290 | $ | 133,259 | $ | 91,121 | $ | | $ | 224,670 | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
58
Table of Contents
QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 61,606 | $ | 48,379 | $ | 46,119 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation |
4,304 | 3,663 | 2,911 | |||||||||
Amortization of capitalized software costs |
7,091 | 5,927 | 5,163 | |||||||||
Amortization of other intangibles |
3,255 | 1,783 | 1,034 | |||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
3,780 | 3,465 | 2,089 | |||||||||
Provision (recovery) for inventory obsolescence |
27 | 27 | (13 | ) | ||||||||
Share-based compensation |
3,748 | 2,073 | 1,977 | |||||||||
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense |
(4,194 | ) | (786 | ) | 4,462 | |||||||
Tax benefit associated with stock options |
1,524 | 1,576 | 3,382 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation |
(1,524 | ) | (1,576 | ) | (3,381 | ) | ||||||
Loss (gain) on disposal of equipment and improvements |
(33 | ) | | 96 | ||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of amounts acquired: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(36,094 | ) | (18,944 | ) | (11,369 | ) | ||||||
Inventories |
(620 | ) | (238 | ) | (88 | ) | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
2,953 | 3,875 | (5,433 | ) | ||||||||
Other current assets |
(2,074 | ) | (2,310 | ) | (1,202 | ) | ||||||
Other assets |
(1,817 | ) | (894 | ) | (448 | ) | ||||||
Accounts payable |
3,344 | (1,810 | ) | (299 | ) | |||||||
Deferred revenue |
13,211 | 12,528 | 3,130 | |||||||||
Accrued compensation and related benefits |
1,296 | (1,006 | ) | 136 | ||||||||
Income taxes payable |
3,530 | (1,404 | ) | (1,541 | ) | |||||||
Other current liabilities |
13,096 | 846 | 2,055 | |||||||||
Deferred compensation |
605 | 46 | (68 | ) | ||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
(6,950 | ) | | | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
70,064 | 55,220 | 48,712 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Additions to capitalized software costs |
(10,695 | ) | (7,921 | ) | (5,863 | ) | ||||||
Additions to equipment and improvements |
(6,804 | ) | (4,935 | ) | (3,218 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from disposal of equipment and improvements |
336 | | | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
7,700 | 425 | 14,825 | |||||||||
Purchases of marketable securities |
(1,120 | ) | | | ||||||||
Cash acquired from purchase of Opus |
| 2,036 | | |||||||||
Purchase of Opus |
| (250 | ) | | ||||||||
Purchase of NextGen IS |
| (300 | ) | | ||||||||
Purchase of PMP, including direct transaction costs |
| | (16,950 | ) | ||||||||
Purchase of HSI, including direct transaction costs |
| | (8,241 | ) | ||||||||
Payment of
contingent consideration related to purchase of PMP |
| (3,000 | ) | | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(10,583 | ) | (13,945 | ) | (19,447 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation |
1,524 | 1,576 | 3,381 | |||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
5,717 | 5,855 | 12,519 | |||||||||
Dividends paid |
(34,716 | ) | (34,275 | ) | (30,763 | ) | ||||||
Loan repayment |
| (3,268 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(27,475 | ) | (26,844 | ) | (18,131 | ) | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
32,006 | 14,431 | 11,134 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
84,611 | 70,180 | 59,046 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 116,617 | $ | 84,611 | $ | 70,180 | ||||||
59
Table of Contents
QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands)
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net of
refunds |
$ | 29,044 | $ | 24,506 | $ | 26,455 | ||||||
Non-cash investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Tenant improvement allowance received from landlord |
$ | 1,970 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax |
$ | | $ | | $ | 196 | ||||||
Issuance of stock options with fair value of $433 in
connection with the acquisition of PMP |
$ | | $ | 433 | $ | | ||||||
Effective February 10, 2010, the Company acquired
Opus in a transaction summarized as follows: |
||||||||||||
Fair value of net assets acquired |
$ | | $ | 32,209 | $ | | ||||||
Cash paid |
| (250 | ) | | ||||||||
Common stock issued for Opus stock |
| (8,815 | ) | | ||||||||
Fair value of contingent consideration |
| (11,516 | ) | | ||||||||
Liabilities assumed |
$ | | $ | 11,628 | $ | | ||||||
Effective August 12, 2009, the Company acquired
NextGen IS in a transaction summarized as follows: |
||||||||||||
Fair value of net assets acquired |
$ | | $ | 1,453 | $ | | ||||||
Cash paid |
| (300 | ) | | ||||||||
Fair value of contingent consideration |
| (1,074 | ) | | ||||||||
Liabilities assumed |
$ | | $ | 79 | $ | | ||||||
Effective October 28, 2008, the Company acquired
PMP in a transaction summarized as follows: |
||||||||||||
Fair value of net assets acquired |
$ | | $ | | $ | 23,875 | ||||||
Cash paid |
| | (16,950 | ) | ||||||||
Common stock issued for PMP stock |
| | (2,750 | ) | ||||||||
Liabilities assumed |
$ | | $ | | $ | 4,175 | ||||||
Effective May 20, 2008, the Company acquired
HSI in a transaction summarized as follows: |
||||||||||||
Fair value of net assets acquired |
$ | | $ | | $ | 20,609 | ||||||
Cash paid |
| | (8,241 | ) | ||||||||
Common stock issued for HSI stock |
| | (7,350 | ) | ||||||||
Liabilities assumed |
$ | | $ | | $ | 5,018 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
60
Table of Contents
QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2011 and 2010
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)
MARCH 31, 2011 and 2010
(In thousands, except shares and per share data)
1. Organization of Business
Description of Business
Quality Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries operates as four business divisions and is comprised of: (i) the QSI Dental Division; (ii) the
NextGen Division, which consists of NextGen Healthcare Information Systems, Inc.(NextGen); (iii)
the Inpatient Solutions Division, which consists of NextGen Inpatient Solutions, LLC (NextGen IS
f/k/a Sphere) and Opus Healthcare Solutions, LLC (Opus); (iv) the Practice Solutions Division,
which consists of Lackland Acquisition II, LLC dba Healthcare Strategic Initiatives (HSI) and
Practice Management Partners, Inc. (PMP) and (v) Quality Systems India Healthcare Private Limited
(QSIH) (collectively, the Company). The Company develops and markets healthcare information
systems that automate certain aspects of medical and dental practices, networks of practices such
as physician hospital organizations (PHOs) and management service organizations (MSOs),
ambulatory care centers, community health centers and medical and dental schools. The Company also
provides revenue cycle management (RCM) services through the Practice Solutions Division.
The Company, a California corporation formed in 1974, was founded with an early focus on providing
information systems to dental group practices. In the mid-1980s, the Company capitalized on the
increasing focus on medical cost containment and further expanded its information processing
systems to serve the medical market. In the mid-1990s, the Company made two acquisitions that
accelerated its penetration of the medical market. These two acquisitions formed the basis for the
NextGen Division. Today, we serve the physician, inpatient and dental markets through our QSI
Dental Division, NextGen Division, Inpatient Solutions Division and Practice Solutions Division.
The QSI Dental Division, co-located with the Corporate Headquarters in Irvine, California,
currently focuses on developing, marketing and supporting software suites sold to dental practices.
The NextGen Division, with headquarters in Horsham, Pennsylvania, provides integrated clinical,
financial and connectivity solutions for ambulatory and dental provider organizations.
The Inpatient Solutions Division, with its primary location in Austin, Texas, provides integrated
clinical, financial and connectivity solutions for rural and community hospitals.
The Practice Solutions Division, with locations in St. Louis, Missouri and Hunt Valley, Maryland,
focuses primarily on providing physician practices with RCM services, primarily billing and
collection services for medical practices. This Division combines a web-delivered SaaS model and
the NextGenpm software platform to execute its service offerings.
Located in Bangalore, India, QSIH was formed in January 2011 to function as the Companys
India-based captive to offshore technology application development and business processing
services.
The Divisions operate largely as stand-alone operations, with each Division maintaining its own
distinct product lines, product platforms, development, implementation and support teams, sales
staffing and branding. The Divisions share the resources of the Companys corporate office,
which includes a variety of accounting and other administrative functions. Additionally, there are
a small but growing number of clients who are simultaneously utilizing software or services from
more than one of the Divisions.
Acquisitions
On May 20, 2008, the Company acquired St. Louis-based HSI, a full-service healthcare RCM company.
HSI operates under the umbrella of the Companys Practice Solutions Division. Founded in 1996, HSI
provides RCM services to providers including health systems, hospitals and physicians in private
practice with an in-house team of more than 200 employees, including specialists in medical
billing, coding and compliance, payor credentialing and information technology. The Company
intends to cross sell both software and RCM services to the acquired client base of HSI and the
NextGen Division.
On October 28, 2008, the Company acquired Maryland-based PMP, a full-service healthcare RCM
company. This acquisition is also part of the Companys growth strategy for the Practice Solutions
Division. Similar to HSI, PMP operates under the umbrella of the Companys Practice Solutions
Division. Founded in 2001, PMP provides physician billing and technology management services to
healthcare providers, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region. The Company intends to cross sell both
software and RCM services to the acquired client base of PMP and the NextGen Division.
On August 12, 2009, the Company acquired NextGen IS, a provider of financial information systems to
the small hospital inpatient market. This acquisition is also part of the Companys strategy to
expand into the small hospital market and to add new clients by taking advantage of cross selling
opportunities between the ambulatory and inpatient markets.
61
Table of Contents
On February 10, 2010, the Company acquired Opus, a provider of clinical information systems to the
small hospital inpatient market. Founded in 1987 and headquartered in Austin, Texas, Opus delivers
web-based clinical solutions to hospital systems and integrated health networks nationwide. This
acquisition complements and will be integrated with the assets of NextGen IS. Both companies are
established developers of software and services for the inpatient market and will operate under the
Companys Inpatient Solutions Division.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Quality
Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, which consists of NextGen Healthcare Information
Systems, Lackland Acquisition II, LLC dba Healthcare Strategic Initiatives, Practice Management
Partners, Inc., NextGen Inpatient Solutions, LLC and Opus Healthcare Solutions, LLC and Quality
Systems India Healthcare Private Limited. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
Business Segments. The Company has prepared operating segment information in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 280,
Segment Reporting, or ASC 280, which requires that companies disclose operating segments based on
the manner in which management disaggregates the Companys operations for making internal operating
decisions. See Note 14.
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with fiscal year 2011 presentation.
References to amounts in the consolidated financial statement sections are in thousands, except
shares and per share data, unless otherwise specified.
Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue for system sales pursuant to FASB ASC Topic
985-605, Software, Revenue Recognition, or ASC 985-605. The Company generates revenue from the
sale of licensing rights to its software products directly to end-users and value-added resellers,
or VARs. The Company also generates revenue from sales of hardware and third-party software,
implementation, training, electronic data interchange (EDI), post-contract support (maintenance)
and other services, including revenue cycle management (RCM), performed for clients who license
its products.
A typical system contract contains multiple elements of the above items. FASB ASC Topic
985-605-25, Software, Revenue Recognition, Multiple Elements, or ASC 985-605-25, requires revenue
earned on software arrangements involving multiple elements to be allocated to each element based
on the relative fair values of those elements. The fair value of an element must be based on
vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE). The Company limits its assessment of VSOE for each
element to either the price charged when the same element is sold separately or the price
established by management having the relevant authority to do so, for an element not yet sold
separately. VSOE calculations are updated and reviewed quarterly or annually depending on the
nature of the product or service. The Company has established VSOE for the related undelivered
elements based on the bell-shaped curve method. Maintenance VSOE for the Companys largest clients
is based on stated renewal rates only if the rate is determined to be substantive and falls within
the Companys customary pricing practices.
When evidence of fair value exists for the delivered and undelivered elements of a transaction,
then discounts for individual elements are aggregated and the total discount is allocated to the
individual elements in proportion to the elements fair value relative to the total contract fair
value.
When evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered elements only, the residual method, provided
for under ASC 985-605, is used. Under the residual method, the Company defers revenue related to
the undelivered elements in a system sale based on VSOE of fair value of each of the undelivered
elements and allocates the remainder of the contract price net of all discounts to revenue
recognized from the delivered elements. If VSOE of fair value of any undelivered element does not
exist, all revenue is deferred until VSOE of fair value of the undelivered element is established
or the element has been delivered.
The Company bills for the entire system sales contract amount upon contract execution except for
maintenance which is billed separately. Amounts billed in excess of the amounts contractually due
are recorded in accounts receivable as advance billings. Amounts are contractually due when
services are performed or in accordance with contractually specified payment dates. Provided the
fees are fixed or determinable and collection is considered probable, revenue from licensing rights
and sales of hardware and third-party software is generally recognized upon physical or electronic
shipment and transfer of title. In certain transactions where collections risk is high, the cash
basis method is used to recognize revenue. If the fee is not fixed or determinable, then the
revenue recognized in each period (subject to application of other revenue recognition criteria)
will be the lesser of the aggregate of amounts due and payable or the amount of the arrangement fee
that would have been recognized if the fees were being recognized using the residual method. Fees
which are considered fixed or determinable at the inception of the Companys arrangements must
include the following characteristics:
§ | The fee must be negotiated at the outset of an arrangement and generally be based on the specific volume of products to be delivered without being subject to change based on variable pricing mechanisms such as the number of units copied or distributed or the expected number of users. |
62
Table of Contents
§ | Payment terms must not be considered extended. If a significant portion of the fee is due more than 12 months after delivery or after the expiration of the license, the fee is presumed not fixed or determinable. |
Revenue from implementation and training services is recognized as the corresponding services are
performed. Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the contractual maintenance period.
Contract accounting is applied where services include significant software modification,
development or customization. In such instances, the arrangement fee is accounted for in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605-35, Revenue Recognition, Construction-Type and Production-Type
Contracts, or ASC 605-35. Pursuant to ASC 605-35, the Company uses the percentage of completion
method provided all of the following conditions exist:
§ | the contract includes provisions that clearly specify the enforceable rights regarding goods or services to be provided and received by the parties, the consideration to be exchanged and the manner and terms of settlement; |
§ | the customer can be expected to satisfy its obligations under the contract; |
§ | the Company can be expected to perform its contractual obligations; and |
§ | reliable estimates of progress towards completion can be made. |
The Company measures completion using labor input hours. Costs of providing services, including
services accounted for in accordance with ASC 605-35, are expensed as incurred.
If a situation occurs in which a contract is so short term that the financial statements would not
vary materially from using the percentage-of-completion method or in which the Company is unable to
make reliable estimates of progress of completion of the contract, the completed contract method is
utilized.
Product returns are estimated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605-15, Revenue Recognition,
Products, or ASC 605-15. The Company also ensures that the other criteria in ASC 605-15 have been
met prior to recognition of revenue:
§ | the price is fixed or determinable; |
§ | the customer is obligated to pay and there are no contingencies surrounding the obligation or the payment; |
§ | the customers obligation would not change in the event of theft or damage to the product; |
§ | the customer has economic substance; |
§ | the amount of returns can be reasonably estimated; and |
§ | the Company does not have significant obligations for future performance in order to bring about resale of the product by the customer. |
The Company has historically offered short-term rights of return in certain sales arrangements. If
the Company is able to estimate returns for these types of arrangements, revenue is recognized, net
of an allowance for returns, and these arrangements are recorded in the consolidated financial
statements. If the Company is unable to estimate returns for these types of arrangements, revenue
is not recognized in the consolidated financial statements until the rights of return expire.
Revenue related to sales arrangements that include the right to use software stored on the
Companys hardware is accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 985-605-05, Software, Revenue Recognition,
Hosting Arrangements, or ASC 985-605-05, which requires that for software licenses and related
implementation services to continue to fall under ASC 985-605-05, the customer must have the
contractual right to take possession of the software without incurring a significant penalty and it
must be feasible for the customer to either host the software themselves or through another
third-party. If an arrangement is not deemed to be accounted for under ASC 985-605-05, the entire
arrangement is accounted for as a service contract in accordance with ASC 985-605-25. In that
instance, the entire arrangement would be recognized during the period that the hosting services
are being performed.
From time to time, the Company offers future purchase discounts on its products and services as
part of its sales arrangements. Pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 985-605-55, Software, Revenue
Recognition, Flowchart of Revenue Recognition on Software Arrangements, or ASC 985-605-55, such
discounts that are incremental to the range of discounts reflected in the pricing of the other
elements of the arrangement, that are incremental to the range of discounts typically given in
comparable transactions, and that are significant, are treated as an additional element of the
contract to be deferred. Amounts deferred related to future purchase options are not recognized
until either the customer exercises the discount offer or the offer expires.
RCM service revenue is derived from services fees, which include amounts charged for ongoing
billing and other related services, and are generally billed to the customer as a percentage of
total collections. The Company does not recognize revenue for services fees until these
collections are made, as the services fees are not fixed or determinable until such time.
Revenue is divided into two categories, system sales and maintenance, EDI, RCM and other
services. Revenue in the system sales category includes software license fees, third-party
hardware and software and implementation and training services related to purchase of the Companys
software systems. Revenue in the maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services category includes
maintenance, EDI, RCM services, follow on training and implementation services, annual third-party
license fees, hosting services and other services revenue.
63
Table of Contents
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents generally consist of cash, money market funds
and short-term U.S. Treasury securities with maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase.
The Company had cash deposits at U.S. banks and financial institutions at March 31, 2011 of which
$113,733 was in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit of $250 per
owner. The Company is exposed to credit loss for amounts in excess of insured limits in the event
of nonperformance by the institutions; however, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by
these institutions.
The money market fund in which the Company holds a portion of its cash invests in only investment
grade money market instruments from a variety of industries, and therefore bears relatively low
market risk. The average maturity of the investments owned by the money market fund is
approximately two months.
Restricted Cash. Restricted cash consists of cash which is being held by HSI acting as agent for
the disbursement of certain state social services programs. The Company records an offsetting
Care Services liability (see also Note 9) when it initially receives such cash from the
government social service programs and relieves both restricted cash and the Care Services
liability when amounts are disbursed. HSI earns an administrative fee which is based on a
percentage of funds disbursed on behalf of certain government social service programs.
Marketable Securities. Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded
at fair value, based on quoted market rates when observable or valuation analysis when appropriate.
Unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, are reported as a component of shareholders equity.
Realized gains and losses on investments are included as interest income.
As of March 31, 2011, the Companys marketable securities consisted of fixed-income municipal
securities. Previously, the Company also held investments in tax exempt municipal auction-rate
securities (ARS), which were classified as either current or non-current marketable securities
depending on the liquidity and timing of expected realization of such securities. The ARS were
rated by one or more national rating agencies and had contractual terms of up to 30 years, but
generally had interest rate reset dates that occurred every 7, 28 or 35 days. Despite the
underlying long-term maturity of ARS, such securities were priced and subsequently traded as
short-term investments because of the interest rate reset feature. If there were insufficient
buyers, the auction is said to fail and the holders were unable to liquidate the investments
through auction. A failed auction did not result in a default of the debt instrument. Under their
respective terms, the securities continued to accrue interest and be auctioned until the auction
succeeded, the issuer called the securities or the securities matured. In February 2008, the
Company began to experience failed auctions on its ARS.
The Companys ARS were held by UBS Financial Services Inc. (UBS). On November 13, 2008, the
Company entered into an Auction Rate Security Rights Agreement (the Rights Agreement) with UBS,
whereby the Company accepted UBSs offer to purchase the Companys ARS investments at any time
during the period of June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012. On June 30, 2010, the earliest date allowable under the Rights Agreement, the Company exercised its
ARS put option rights and put its ARS back to UBS. The ARS were sold and settled on July 1, 2010
at 100% of the $7,700 par value.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company provides credit terms typically ranging from thirty
days to less than twelve months for most system and maintenance contract sales and generally does
not require collateral. The Company performs credit evaluations of its clients and maintains
reserves for estimated credit losses. Reserves for potential credit losses are determined by
establishing both specific and general reserves. Specific reserves are based on managements
estimate of the probability of collection for certain troubled accounts. General reserves are
established based on the Companys historical experience of bad debt expense and the aging of the
Companys accounts receivable balances, net of deferred revenue and specifically reserved accounts.
Accounts are written off as uncollectible only after the Company has expended extensive collection
efforts.
Included in accounts receivable are amounts related to maintenance and services which were billed,
but which had not yet been rendered as of the end of the period. Undelivered maintenance and
services are included as a component of deferred revenue (see also Note 9).
Inventories. Inventories consist of hardware for specific client orders and spare parts and are
valued at lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Management provides a reserve to reduce
inventory to its net realizable value.
Equipment and Improvements. Equipment and improvements are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Repair and maintenance costs that do not improve service potential
or extend economic life are expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization of equipment and
improvements are provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or the related lease terms
if shorter, by the straight-line method. Useful lives generally have the following ranges:
|
Computers equipment | 3-5 years | ||
|
Furniture and fixtures | 5-7 years | ||
|
Leasehold improvements | lesser of lease term or estimated useful life of asset |
Costs incurred to develop internal-use software during the application development stage are
capitalized, stated at cost, and amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets, which is seven years. Application development stage costs generally include
costs associated with internal-use software configuration, coding, installation and testing. Costs
of significant upgrades and enhancements that
64
Table of Contents
result in additional functionality are also capitalized, whereas costs incurred for maintenance and
minor upgrades and enhancements are expensed as incurred.
Software Development Costs. Development costs incurred in the research and development of new
software products and enhancements to existing software products for external use are expensed as
incurred until technological feasibility has been established. After technological feasibility is
established, any additional external software development costs are capitalized in accordance with
FASB ASC Topic 985-20, Software, Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed, or ASC
985-20. Such capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic
life of the related product, which is typically three years. The Company provides support services
on the current and prior two versions of its software. Management performs an annual review of the
estimated economic life and the recoverability of such capitalized software costs. If a
determination is made that capitalized amounts are not recoverable based on the estimated cash
flows to be generated from the applicable software, any remaining capitalized amounts are written
off.
Goodwill. Goodwill is related to NextGen and the HSI, PMP, NextGen IS and Opus acquisitions, which
closed on May 20, 2008, October 28, 2008, August 12, 2009 and February 10, 2010, respectively (see
Notes 5 and 6). In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350-20, Intangibles Goodwill and Other,
Goodwill, or ASC 350-20, the Company tests goodwill for impairment annually at the end of its first
fiscal quarter, referred to as the annual test date and has determined that there was no impairment
to its goodwill as of June 30, 2010. The Company will also test for impairment between annual test
dates if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be
impaired. Impairment testing for goodwill is performed at a reporting-unit level, which is defined
as an operating segment or one level below and operating segment (referred to as a component). A
component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for
which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the
operating results of that component.
The Company has determined that NextGen, HSI and PMP each qualify as a separate reporting unit
while NextGen IS and Opus are aggregated as one reporting unit at which goodwill impairment testing
is performed.
An impairment loss would generally be recognized when the carrying amount of the reporting units
net assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. As of March 31, 2011, the
Company has not identified any events or circumstances that would require an interim goodwill
impairment test. See Note 6.
Intangible Assets. Intangible assets consist of capitalized software costs, customer
relationships, trade names and certain software technology. Intangible assets related to customer
relationships, trade names, and software technology arose in connection with the acquisition of
HSI, PMP, NextGen IS and Opus. These intangible assets were recorded at fair value and are stated
net of accumulated amortization. Intangible assets are amortized over their remaining estimated
useful lives, ranging from 3 to 9 years. The Companys amortization policy for intangible assets
is based on the principles in FASB ASC Topic 350-30, Intangibles Goodwill and Other, General
Intangibles Other than Goodwill, or ASC 350-30, which requires that the amortization of intangible
assets reflect the pattern that the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed.
Long-Lived Assets. The Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets at least annually
or whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred
in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 360-10, Property, Plant, and Equipment, Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, or ASC 360-10. If the future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from
the use of the related assets are less than the carrying value of such assets, impairment has been
incurred and a loss is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the long-lived assets to fair
value, which is determined by discounting estimated future cash flows.
Management periodically reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets to determine whether or not
impairment to such value has occurred and has determined that there was no impairment to its
long-lived assets as of March 31, 2011. In addition to the recoverability assessment, the Company
routinely reviews the remaining estimated lives of its long-lived assets.
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, Income
Taxes, or ASC 740. Income taxes are provided based on current taxable income and the future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and
tax reporting. The deferred income tax assets and liabilities represent the future state and
federal tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible
when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred income taxes are also
recognized for operating losses that are available to offset future taxable income and tax credits
that are available to offset future income taxes. At each reporting period, management assesses
the realizable value of deferred tax assets based on, among other things, estimates of future
taxable income and adjusts the related valuation allowance as necessary. Management makes a number
of assumptions and estimates in determining the appropriate amount of expense to record for income
taxes. These assumptions and estimates consider the taxing jurisdiction in which the Company
operates as well as current tax regulations. Accruals are established for estimates of tax effects
for certain transactions and future projected profitability of the Companys businesses based on
managements interpretation of existing facts and circumstances.
Self-Insurance Liabilities. Effective January 1, 2010, the Company became self-insured with
respect to healthcare claims, subject to stop-loss limits. The Company accrues for estimated
self-insurance costs and uninsured exposures based on claims filed and an estimate of claims
incurred but not reported as of each balance sheet date. However, it is possible that recorded
accruals may not be adequate to cover the future payment of claims. Adjustments, if any, to
estimated accruals resulting from ultimate claim payments will be reflected in earnings during the
periods in which such adjustments are determined. Periodically, the Company reevaluates the
adequacy of the accruals by comparing amounts accrued on the balance sheets for anticipated losses
to an updated actuarial loss forecasts and third-party claim administrator loss estimates and makes
adjustments to the accruals as needed. The self-insurance accrual is included in other current
liabilities. If any of the factors that
65
Table of Contents
contribute to the overall cost of insurance claims were to change, the actual amount incurred for
the self-insurance liabilities would be directly affected.
As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, the self-insurance accrual was approximately $475 and $516,
respectively, and is included in other current liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. If any of the factors that contribute to the overall cost of insurance claims were to
change, the actual amount incurred for the self-insurance liabilities would be directly affected.
Advertising Costs. Advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred. The Company does not
have any direct-response advertising. Advertising costs, which include trade shows and
conventions, were approximately $7,122, $6,198 and $3,459 for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010
and 2009, respectively, and were included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income.
Marketing Assistance Agreements. The Company has entered into marketing assistance agreements with
certain existing users of the Companys products, which provide the opportunity for those users to
earn commissions if they host specific site visits upon the Companys request for prospective
clients that directly result in a purchase of the Companys software by the visiting prospects.
Amounts earned by existing users under this program are treated as a selling expense in the period
when earned.
Other Comprehensive Loss. Comprehensive income and loss includes all changes in shareholders
equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to
owners. The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax, consist of
unrealized losses on marketable securities of $196 as of March 31, 2008. There were no other
comprehensive income items for the years ended March 31, 2011 or 2010.
Foreign Currency Translation. The U.S. dollar is considered to be the functional currency for QSIH
because it acts primarily as an extension of the Companys operations. The determination of
functional currency is primarily based on QSIHs relative financial and operational dependence.
Assets and liabilities are re-measured at current exchange rates, except for property and
equipment, depreciation and investments, which are translated at historical exchange rates.
Revenues and expenses are re-measured at weighted average exchange rates in effect during the year
except for costs related to the above mentioned balance sheet items, which are translated at
historical rates. Foreign currency gains and losses are included in other income (expense) in the
consolidated statements of income. The net foreign currency gain (loss) for the year ended March
31, 2011 was not significant because QSIH was formed in January 2011. There was no net foreign
currency translation for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Earnings per Share. Pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share, or ASC 260, the Company
provides dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS).
Basic EPS excludes dilution from common stock equivalents and is computed by dividing income
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for
the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution from common stock equivalents and is based
on the assumption that the Companys outstanding options are included in the calculation of diluted
earnings per share, except when their effect would be anti-dilutive. Dilution is computed by
applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options are assumed to be exercised at the
beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby
were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The following
table reconciles the weighted-average shares outstanding for basic and diluted net income per share
for the periods indicated:
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 61,606 | $ | 48,379 | $ | 46,119 | ||||||
Basic net income per share: |
||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding Basic |
28,947 | 28,635 | 28,031 | |||||||||
Basic net income per common share |
$ | 2.13 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.65 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 61,606 | $ | 48,379 | $ | 46,119 | ||||||
Diluted net income per share: |
||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding Basic |
28,947 | 28,635 | 28,031 | |||||||||
Effect of potentially dilutive securities |
171 | 161 | 365 | |||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding Diluted |
29,118 | 28,796 | 28,396 | |||||||||
Diluted net income per common share |
$ | 2.12 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 1.62 | ||||||
The computation of diluted net income per share does not include 257, 75 and 440 options for the
years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, because their inclusion would have an
anti-dilutive effect on net income per share.
66
Table of Contents
Share-Based Compensation. FASB ASC Topic 718 Compensation Stock Compensation, or ASC 718,
requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant
using an option-pricing model. Expected term is estimated using historical exercise experience.
Volatility is estimated by using the weighted-average historical volatility of the Companys common
stock, which approximates expected volatility. The risk free rate is the implied yield available
on the U.S Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms equal to the expected term. The
expected dividend yield is the average dividend rate during a period equal to the expected term of
the option. Those inputs are then entered into the Black Scholes model to determine the estimated
fair value. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is
recognized ratably as expense over the requisite service period in the Companys consolidated
statements of income.
Share-based compensation is adjusted on a quarterly basis for changes to estimated forfeitures
based on a review of historical forfeiture activity. To the extent that actual forfeitures differ,
or are expected to differ, from the estimate, share-based compensation expense is adjusted
accordingly. The effect of the forfeiture adjustments for years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and
2009 was not significant.
The following table shows total share-based compensation expense included in the consolidated
statements of income for years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009:
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 272 | $ | 85 | $ | 195 | ||||||
Research and development costs |
152 | 108 | 242 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
3,324 | 1,880 | 1,540 | |||||||||
Total share-based compensation |
3,748 | 2,073 | 1,977 | |||||||||
Amounts capitalized in software development costs |
(2 | ) | (27 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||
Amounts charged against earnings, before income tax benefit |
$ | 3,746 | $ | 2,046 | $ | 1,956 | ||||||
Related income tax benefit |
(1,343 | ) | (608 | ) | (549 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in net income |
$ | 2,403 | $ | 1,438 | $ | 1,407 | ||||||
Sales Taxes. In accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 605-45, Revenue Recognition,
Principal Agent Considerations, or ASC 605-45, the Company accounts for sales taxes imposed on its
goods and services on a net basis in the consolidated statements of income.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an
ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to uncollectible
receivables, vendor specific objective evidence, self-insurance accruals and income taxes and
related credits and deductions. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions.
New Accounting Standards. In October 2009, FASB issued an amendment to its accounting guidance on
revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. This new accounting guidance addresses the unit of
accounting for arrangements involving multiple deliverables and how consideration should be
allocated to separate units of accounting, when applicable. This guidance is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. There was no material impact from the adoption of this
guidance on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In October 2009, FASB issued an amendment to its accounting guidance on certain revenue
arrangements that include software elements. The new accounting guidance excludes from
consideration of software revenue recognition principles all tangible products containing both
software and non-software components that function together to deliver the products essential
functionality. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010.
This guidance must be adopted in the same period that the company adopts the amended accounting for
arrangements with multiple deliverables described in the preceding paragraph. There was no material
impact from the adoption of this guidance on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In January 2010, FASB issued an amendment regarding improving disclosures about fair value
measurements. This new guidance requires some new disclosures and clarifies some existing
disclosure requirements about fair value measurement. The new disclosures and clarifications of
existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in
the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal
years. There was no impact from the adoption of this guidance to our consolidated financial
position or results of operations as the amendment only addresses disclosures.
67
Table of Contents
In April 2010, FASB issued an amendment to Stock Compensation. The amendment clarifies that an
employee stock-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market
in which a substantial portion of the entitys equity shares trades should not be considered to
contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity
would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments
are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. We do not anticipate any impact from our adoption of this guidance since
our stock-based payment awards have an exercise price denominated in the same currency of the
market in which our Company shares are traded.
In December 2010, FASB issued an amendment to goodwill impairment test. The amendments modify Step
1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For
those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if
it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more
likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any
adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are
consistent with the existing guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit
be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would
more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The
amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. We do not anticipate any impact from our
adoption of this guidance since we do not have any reporting units with zero or negative carrying
amounts at December 31, 2010.
In December 2010, FASB issued an amendment to the disclosure of supplementary pro forma information
for business combinations. The amendments in this ASU specify that if a public entity presents
comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined
entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of
the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the
supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material,
nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in
the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments are effective prospectively for
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted but
was not elected. The Company does not expect the amendments to have a significant impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
3. Cash and Cash Equivalents
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $116,617 and $84,611,
respectively. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash, money market funds and short-term U.S.
Treasury securities with original maturities of less than 90 days. The money market fund in which
the Company holds a portion of its cash invests in only investment grade money market instruments
from a variety of industries, and therefore bears relatively low market risk. The average maturity
of the investments owned by the money market fund is approximately two months.
4. Fair Value Measurements
The Company applies ASC 820 with respect to fair value measurements of (a) nonfinancial assets and
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value and (b) all financial assets and
liabilities. As defined by ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market
for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement
date. The Company estimates fair value utilizing market data or assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability in a current transaction, including
assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. The
Companys financial instruments, other than those presented in the disclosures below, include
accounts receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The carrying value of these assets
and liabilities approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. ASC
820 prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into the following hierarchy (with Level 1
as the highest priority):
Level 1
|
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; | |
Level 2
|
Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1 (for example, quoted prices for similar assets in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets in inactive markets); and | |
Level 3
|
Unobservable inputs reflecting managements own assumptions about the inputs used in estimating the value of the asset. |
68
Table of Contents
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The financial
assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys assessment of the significance of a
particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of
fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The
following tables sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Companys financial assets
and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2011 and
March 31, 2010:
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||||||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Markets for | Other | |||||||||||||||
Balance at | Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
March 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 116,617 | $ | 116,617 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Restricted cash |
3,787 | 3,787 | | | ||||||||||||
Marketable securities |
1,120 | 1,120 | | | ||||||||||||
$ | 121,524 | $ | 121,524 | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Contingent consideration related to acquisitions |
$ | 13,658 | | $ | 12,743 | $ | 915 | |||||||||
$ | 13,658 | $ | | $ | 12,743 | $ | 915 | |||||||||
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||||||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Markets for | Other | |||||||||||||||
Balance at | Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
March 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 84,611 | $ | 84,611 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Restricted cash |
2,339 | 2,339 | | | ||||||||||||
Marketable securities (1) |
7,158 | | | 7,158 | ||||||||||||
ARS put option rights (2) |
548 | | | 548 | ||||||||||||
$ | 94,656 | $ | 86,950 | $ | | $ | 7,706 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Contingent consideration related to acquisitions |
$ | 12,590 | $ | | $ | | $ | 12,590 | ||||||||
$ | 12,590 | $ | | $ | | $ | 12,590 | |||||||||
(1) | Marketable securities consist of ARS. | |
(2) | ARS put option rights are included in other current assets. |
On June 30, 2010, the earliest date allowable under the Rights Agreement, the Company exercised
its ARS put option rights and put its ARS back to UBS, resulting in a net loss of $6, which is
included in other income on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The ARS were sold
and settled on July 1, 2010 at 100% of the $7,700 par value. The Company recorded interest of $83
from the ARS for year ended March 31, 2011. The Company has no outstanding ARS or ARS put option
rights at March 31, 2011.
The Companys contingent consideration liability is accounted for at fair value on a recurring
basis and is adjusted to fair value when the carrying value differs from fair value. The
categorization of the framework used to measure fair value of the NextGen IS contingent
consideration liability is considered Level 3 due to the subjective nature of the unobservable
inputs used. The fair value of the NextGen IS contingent consideration liability of $915 was
estimated based on the probability of achieving certain business milestones.
69
Table of Contents
The following table presents activity in the Companys financial assets and liabilities measured at
fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), as defined by ASC 820, as of and for
the year ended March 31, 2011:
Assets | Liabilities | |||||||
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
$ | 7,863 | $ | | ||||
Transfer into Level 3 |
| 12,590 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale at par |
(425 | ) | | |||||
Recognized gain |
268 | | ||||||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | 7,706 | $ | 12,590 | ||||
Transfer out of Level 3 |
| (12,743 | ) | |||||
Earnout payments |
| (253 | ) | |||||
Goodwill adjustment (1) |
| 532 | ||||||
Fair value adjustments, net |
| 789 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale at par |
(7,700 | ) | | |||||
Recognized loss |
(6 | ) | | |||||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | | $ | 915 | ||||
(1) | Adjustment made to goodwill that should have been recorded as part of the final purchase price allocation as of March 31, 2010. Refer to Note 5 Business Combinations for additional details. |
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The Company has certain assets, including equipment and improvements, goodwill and other intangible
assets, which are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are adjusted to fair value
only if an impairment charge is recognized. The categorization of the framework used to measure
fair value of the assets is considered Level 3 due to the subjective nature of the unobservable
inputs used. During the year ended March 31, 2011, there were no adjustments to fair value of such
assets.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair value of financial instruments is determined using the best available market
information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessary
in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates
presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current
market exchange, or the value that ultimately will be realized upon maturity or disposition. The
use of different market assumptions may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The Companys financial instruments, other than those presented in the disclosures above, include
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The
carrying value of these assets and liabilities approximates fair value because of the short-term
nature of these instruments.
Interest income related to cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities for years ended
March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Interest Income |
$ | 263 | $ | 226 | $ | 1,203 | ||||||
5. Business Combinations
On February 10, 2010, the Company acquired Opus, a provider of clinical information systems to the
small hospital inpatient market. The Opus purchase price totaled $21,113, which includes a fair
value adjustment of $532 to goodwill and the contingent consideration liability that was recorded
during the year ended March 31, 2011. The fair value of the total Opus contingent consideration of
$12,048 was estimated at the time of purchase based on the probability of Opus achieving certain
earnout payments to be paid over a two year period to the selling security holders and former stock
option holders (option holders) of Opus if certain operational and strategic objectives were met.
On March 30, 2011, the Company entered into an amendment to the merger agreement to early terminate
the terms of the earnout under the original merger agreement for $12,250, payable in 143,000 shares
of Company common stock to the selling security holders and $856 in cash to the option holders.
70
Table of Contents
The fair value of the Opus earnout settlement was $12,743, which is the fair value of the Opus
contingent consideration recorded in other current liabilities as of March 31, 2011. In reviewing
the final settlement, the Company identified an error in the initial purchase price allocation
related to the fair value of the price collar provisions in the merger agreement. As a result, the
Company recorded an adjustment of $532 to goodwill and contingent consideration liability to
correct the initial purchase price allocation as of February 10, 2010. The Company has concluded
that this correction is not material to any periods affected.
On August 12, 2009, the Company acquired NextGen IS, a provider of financial information systems to
the small hospital inpatient market. The NextGen IS purchase price totaled $1,374, including
contingent consideration payable over a five year period, consisting of maintenance revenue and
license fee payments, estimated at approximately $1,074 based on the probability of achieving
certain business milestones, but which in no event shall exceed $2,500.
The Company accounted for the Opus and NextGen IS acquisitions as a purchase business combination
as defined in FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, or ASC 805. Under the acquisition method
of accounting, the purchase price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair
value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed represent managements estimate of fair value.
The estimated fair value of the acquired tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed
were determined using multiple valuation approaches depending on the type of tangible or intangible
asset acquired, including but not limited to the income approach, the excess earnings method as
well as the relief from royalty method approach.
The total purchase price for Opus and NextGen IS is summarized as follows:
Opus | NextGen IS | |||||||
Cash paid |
$ | 250 | $ | 300 | ||||
Common stock issued at fair value |
8,815 | | ||||||
Contingent consideration |
12,048 | 1,074 | ||||||
Total purchase price |
$ | 21,113 | $ | 1,374 | ||||
The following table summarizes the final allocation of the Opus and NextGen IS purchase price:
Opus | NextGen IS | |||||||
Fair value of the net tangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,036 | $ | | ||||
Current assets (including accounts receivable of
$1,753 and $158 for Opus and NextGen IS, respectively) |
3,435 | 158 | ||||||
Equipment and improvements and other long-term assets |
483 | | ||||||
Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities |
(7,678 | ) | | |||||
Current liabilities, including long-term debt due within
one year |
| (79 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenues |
(3,950 | ) | | |||||
Total tangible assets
acquired and liabilities
assumed |
(5,674 | ) | 79 | |||||
Fair value of identifiable
intangible assets acquired: |
||||||||
Customer relationships |
1,250 | 156 | ||||||
Software technology |
12,000 | 119 | ||||||
Goodwill (including assembled workforce of $1,000 and
and $84 for Opus and
NextGen IS,
respectively) |
13,537 | 1,020 | ||||||
Total identifiable
intangible assets acquired |
26,787 | 1,295 | ||||||
Total purchase price |
$ | 21,113 | $ | 1,374 | ||||
The pro forma effects of the Opus and NextGen IS acquisitions would not have been material to the
Companys results of operations for the year ended March 31, 2010 and is therefore not presented.
71
Table of Contents
6. Goodwill
In accordance with ASC 350-20, the Company does not amortize goodwill as the goodwill has been
determined to have an indefinite useful life.
Goodwill consists of the following:
Balance at | Balance at | |||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||
2010 | Adjustment (1) | 2011 | ||||||||||
NextGen Division |
||||||||||||
NextGen Healthcare Information Systems, Inc. |
$ | 1,840 | $ | | $ | 1,840 | ||||||
Total NextGen Division goodwill |
1,840 | | 1,840 | |||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
||||||||||||
Opus Healthcare Solutions, Inc. |
13,005 | 532 | 13,537 | |||||||||
NextGen Inpatient Solutions, LLC |
1,020 | | 1,020 | |||||||||
Total Inpatient Solutions Division goodwill |
14,025 | 532 | 14,557 | |||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
||||||||||||
Practice Management Partners, Inc. |
19,485 | | 19,485 | |||||||||
Healthcare Strategic Initiatives |
10,839 | | 10,839 | |||||||||
Total Practice Solutions Division goodwill |
30,324 | | 30,324 | |||||||||
Total goodwill |
$ | 46,189 | $ | 532 | $ | 46,721 | ||||||
(1) | Adjustment made to goodwill that should have been recorded as part of the final purchase price allocation as of March 31, 2010. Refer to Note 5 Business Combinations for additional details. |
7. Intangible Assets
In connection with the Opus acquisition, the Company recorded $13,250 of intangible assets related
to customer relationships and software technology. The Company amortizes the Opus customer
relationships intangible asset over 4 years and the software technology over 8 years.
In connection with the NextGen acquisition, the Company recorded $275 of intangible assets related
to customer relationships and software technology. The Company amortizes the NextGen IS customer
relationships intangible asset over 4 years and the software technology over 3 years.
In
connection with the PMP acquisition, the Company recorded $3,817 of
intangible assets related to customer relationships and trade name.
The Company amortizes the PMP customer relationships intangible asset
over 9 years and trade name over 4 years.
In
connection with the HSI acquisition, the Company recorded $5,620 of
intangible assets related to customer relationships and trade name.
The Company amortizes the HSI customer relationships intangible asset
over 6 years and trade name over 4 years.
The Companys intangible assets, other than capitalized software development costs, with
determinable lives are summarized as follows:
March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer | Software | |||||||||||||||
Relationships | Trade Name | Technology | Total | |||||||||||||
Gross carrying amount |
$ | 10,206 | $ | 637 | $ | 12,119 | $ | 22,962 | ||||||||
Accumulated amortization |
(3,879 | ) | (429 | ) | (1,764 | ) | (6,072 | ) | ||||||||
Net intangible assets |
$ | 6,327 | $ | 208 | $ | 10,355 | $ | 16,890 | ||||||||
Aggregate amortization expense during the year |
$ | 1,522 | $ | 160 | $ | 1,573 | $ | 3,255 | ||||||||
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer | Software | |||||||||||||||
Relationships | Trade Name | Technology | Total | |||||||||||||
Gross carrying amount |
$ | 10,206 | $ | 637 | $ | 12,119 | $ | 22,962 | ||||||||
Accumulated amortization |
(2,357 | ) | (269 | ) | (191 | ) | (2,817 | ) | ||||||||
Net intangible assets |
$ | 7,849 | $ | 368 | $ | 11,928 | $ | 20,145 | ||||||||
Aggregate amortization expense during the year |
$ | 1,434 | $ | 158 | $ | 191 | $ | 1,783 | ||||||||
72
Table of Contents
Activity related to the intangible assets is summarized as follows:
Customer | Software | |||||||||||||||
Relationships | Trade Name | Technology | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
$ | 7,877 | $ | 526 | $ | | $ | 8,403 | ||||||||
Acquisition |
1,406 | | 12,119 | 13,525 | ||||||||||||
Amortization (1) |
(1,434 | ) | (158 | ) | (191 | ) | (1,783 | ) | ||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
7,849 | 368 | 11,928 | 20,145 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Amortization (1) |
(1,522 | ) | (160 | ) | (1,573 | ) | (3,255 | ) | ||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2011 |
$ | 6,327 | $ | 208 | $ | 10,355 | $ | 16,890 | ||||||||
(1) | Amortization of the customer relationships and trade name intangible assets is included in operating expenses and amortization of the software technology intangible assets is included in cost of revenue for software, hardware and supplies. |
The following table represents the remaining estimated amortization of intangible assets with
determinable lives as of March 31, 2011:
For the year ended March 31, |
||||
2012 |
$ | 3,320 | ||
2013 |
3,184 | |||
2014 |
3,055 | |||
2015 |
2,013 | |||
2016 and beyond |
5,318 | |||
Total |
$ | 16,890 | ||
8. Capitalized Software Costs
The Companys capitalized software development costs are summarized as follows:
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Gross carrying amount |
$ | 52,123 | $ | 41,429 | ||||
Accumulated amortization |
(36,973 | ) | (29,883 | ) | ||||
Net capitalized software costs |
$ | 15,150 | $ | 11,546 | ||||
Aggregate amortization expense during the year |
$ | 7,091 | $ | 5,927 | ||||
Activity related to net capitalized software costs is summarized as follows:
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Beginning of the year |
$ | 11,546 | $ | 9,552 | ||||
Capitalized |
10,695 | 7,921 | ||||||
Amortization |
(7,091 | ) | (5,927 | ) | ||||
End of the year |
$ | 15,150 | $ | 11,546 | ||||
73
Table of Contents
The following table represents the remaining estimated amortization of capitalized software costs
as of March 31, 2011:
For the year ended March 31, |
||||
2012 |
$ | 6,975 | ||
2013 |
5,269 | |||
2014 |
2,705 | |||
2015 |
201 | |||
Total |
$ | 15,150 | ||
9. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions
Accounts receivable include amounts related to maintenance and services that were billed but not
yet rendered at each period end. Undelivered maintenance and services are included as a component
of the deferred revenue balance on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, excluding undelivered software,
maintenance and services |
$ | 90,487 | $ | 72,500 | ||||
Undelivered software, maintenance and implementation
services billed in advance, included in deferred revenue |
56,002 | 39,447 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, gross |
146,489 | 111,947 | ||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(6,717 | ) | (4,489 | ) | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
$ | 139,772 | $ | 107,458 | ||||
Inventories are summarized as follows:
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Computer systems and components, net of reserve for
obsolescence of $264 and $237, respectively |
$ | 1,925 | $ | 1,322 | ||||
Miscellaneous parts and supplies |
8 | 18 | ||||||
Inventories |
$ | 1,933 | $ | 1,340 | ||||
Equipment and improvements are summarized as follows:
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Computer equipment |
$ | 23,567 | $ | 18,599 | ||||
Furniture and fixtures |
5,861 | 5,136 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
4,434 | 1,969 | ||||||
33,862 | 25,704 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(21,263 | ) | (17,272 | ) | ||||
Equipment and improvements, net |
$ | 12,599 | $ | 8,432 | ||||
74
Table of Contents
Current and non-current deferred revenue are summarized as follows:
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Maintenance |
$ | 11,108 | $ | 13,242 | ||||
Implementation services |
52,197 | 38,137 | ||||||
Annual license services |
10,127 | 8,214 | ||||||
Undelivered software and other |
3,263 | 4,516 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
$ | 76,695 | $ | 64,109 | ||||
Deferred revenue, net of current |
$ | 1,099 | $ | 474 | ||||
Accrued compensation and related benefits are summarized as follows:
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Payroll, bonus and commission |
$ | 5,014 | $ | 4,185 | ||||
Vacation |
5,233 | 4,766 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and related benefits |
$ | 10,247 | $ | 8,951 | ||||
Other current liabilities are summarized as follows:
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Contingent consideration related to acquisitions |
$ | 13,658 | $ | 5,275 | ||||
Care services liabilities |
3,787 | 2,336 | ||||||
Accrued EDI expense |
2,801 | 2,000 | ||||||
Accrued royalties |
1,752 | 926 | ||||||
Accrued travel |
1,026 | 125 | ||||||
Customer deposits |
962 | 1,036 | ||||||
Outside commission payable |
599 | 468 | ||||||
Sales tax payable |
589 | 506 | ||||||
Self insurance reserve |
475 | 516 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
437 | 641 | ||||||
Professional services |
155 | 391 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
3,075 | 2,000 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
$ | 29,316 | $ | 16,220 | ||||
10. Income Tax
During the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, the Company recognized federal research and
development tax credits of $927, $605 and $859, respectively, and state research and development
tax credits of approximately $119, $129 and $166, respectively. Due to the expiration of the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) statute related to research and development credits on December
31, 2009, the Companys research and development credits claimed for the year ended March 31, 2010
represent credits for the nine-month period from April 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009. In
December 2010, subsequent to the filing of the fiscal year 2010 federal income tax return, a
retroactive extension was enacted to extend the research credit through December 31, 2011.
The Company also claimed the qualified production activities deduction under Section 199 of the
Internal Revenue Code (IRC) for $8,134, $4,133, and $2,747 during the years ended March 31, 2011,
2010, and 2009, respectively. The research and development credits and the qualified production
activities income deduction calculated by the Company involve certain assumptions and judgments
regarding qualification of expenses under the relevant tax code provisions.
75
Table of Contents
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following components:
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal taxes |
$ | 28,979 | $ | 23,750 | $ | 18,818 | ||||||
State taxes |
6,501 | 5,043 | 4,992 | |||||||||
Total current taxes |
35,480 | 28,793 | 23,810 | |||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal taxes |
$ | (2,168 | ) | $ | (768 | ) | $ | 2,802 | ||||
State taxes |
(502 | ) | (186 | ) | 596 | |||||||
Total deferred taxes |
(2,670 | ) | (954 | ) | 3,398 | |||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 32,810 | $ | 27,839 | $ | 27,208 | ||||||
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed at the federal statutory rate as
follows:
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal income tax statutory rate |
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
Increase (decrease) resulting from: |
||||||||||||
State income taxes, net of Federal benefit |
4.1 | 4.3 | 5.2 | |||||||||
Research and development tax credits |
(1.0 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||||
Qualified production activities income deduction |
(3.0 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (1.4 | ) | ||||||
Other |
(0.3 | ) | 0.1 | (0.4 | ) | |||||||
Effective income tax rate |
34.8 | % | 36.5 | % | 37.1 | % | ||||||
The net deferred tax assets and liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consist
of the following:
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Deferred revenue and allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ | 8,646 | $ | 5,577 | ||||
Inventory valuation |
122 | 115 | ||||||
Purchased in-process research and development |
| 601 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
3,180 | 2,325 | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
1,078 | 783 | ||||||
State income taxes |
452 | 640 | ||||||
Compensatory stock option expense |
1,759 | 252 | ||||||
Other |
1,071 | 125 | ||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
16,308 | 10,418 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
$ | (2,181 | ) | $ | (1,529 | ) | ||
Capitalized software |
(5,913 | ) | (4,806 | ) | ||||
Intangibles assets |
(6,132 | ) | (6,938 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expense |
(3,069 | ) | (2,326 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(17,295 | ) | (15,599 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax assets (liabilities), net |
$ | (987 | ) | $ | (5,181 | ) | ||
76
Table of Contents
The deferred tax assets and liabilities have been shown net in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets based on the long-term or short-term nature of the items that give rise to the
deferred amount. No valuation allowance has been made against the deferred tax assets as
management expects to receive the full benefit of the assets recorded.
Uncertain tax positions
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, which is recorded
in income taxes payable in the Companys consolidated balance sheet, is as follows:
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
$ | 67 | ||
Additions for prior year tax positions |
598 | |||
Reductions for prior year tax positions |
(9 | ) | ||
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
$ | 656 | ||
Additions for prior year tax positions |
34 | |||
Reductions for prior year tax positions |
(18 | ) | ||
Balance as of March 31, 2011 |
$ | 672 | ||
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefit that, if recognized, would decrease the income tax
provision is $672.
The Companys continuing practice is to recognize estimated interest and/or penalties related to
income tax matters in general and administrative expenses. The Company had approximately $83 and
$59 of accrued interest related to income tax matters at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No
penalties were accrued.
The Companys income tax returns filed for tax years 2007 through 2009 and 2006 through 2009 are
subject to examination by the federal and state taxing authorities, respectively. The Company is
currently not under examination by the IRS and is under examination by one state income tax
authority and pending examination by three additional state agencies. The Company does not
anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to the settlement of
audits or the expiration of statute of limitations within the next twelve months.
11. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has a 401(k) plan available to substantially all of its employees. Participating
employees may defer up to the IRS limit based on the IRC per year. The annual contribution is
determined by a formula set by the Companys Board of Directors and may include matching and/or
discretionary contributions. The amount of the Company match is discretionary and subject to
change. The retirement plans may be amended or discontinued at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. Contributions of $479, $371 and $357 were made by the Company to the 401(k) plan for
the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company has a deferred compensation plan (the Deferral Plan) for the benefit of those
employees who qualify for inclusion. Participating employees may defer up to 75% of their salary
and 100% of their annual bonus for a Deferral Plan year. In addition, the Company may, but is not
required to, make contributions into the Deferral Plan on behalf of participating employees, and
the amount of the Company match is discretionary and subject to change. Each employees deferrals
together with earnings thereon are accrued as part of the long-term liabilities of the Company.
Investment decisions are made by each participating employee from a family of mutual funds.
Deferred compensation liability was $2,488 and $1,883 at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. To
offset this liability, the Company has purchased life insurance policies on some of the
participants. The Company is the owner and beneficiary of the policies and the cash values are
intended to produce cash needed to help make the benefit payments to employees when they retire or
otherwise leave the Company. The Company intends to hold the life insurance policy until the death
of the plan participant. The net cash surrender value of the life insurance policies for deferred
compensation was $2,953 and $2,670 at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The values of the
life insurance policies and the related Company obligation are included on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets in long-term other assets and long-term deferred compensation,
respectively. The Company made contributions of $33, $48 and $29 to the Deferral Plan for the
years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company has a voluntary employee stock contribution plan for the benefit of full-time
employees. The plan is designed to allow qualified employees to acquire shares of the Companys
common stock through automatic payroll deduction. Each eligible employee may authorize the
withholding of up to 10% of his or her gross payroll each pay period to be used to purchase shares
on the open market by a broker designated by the Company. In addition, the Company will match 5%
of each employees contribution and will pay all brokerage commissions and fees in connection with
each purchase. The amount of the Company match is discretionary and subject to change. The plan
is not intended to be an
employee benefit plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and is therefore
not required to comply with that Act. Contributions of approximately $39, $35 and $14 were made by
the Company for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
77
Table of Contents
12. Share-Based Awards
Employee Stock Option Plans
In September 1998, the Companys shareholders approved a stock option plan (the 1998 Plan) under
which 4,000,000 shares of common stock were reserved for the issuance of options. The 1998 Plan
provides that employees, directors and consultants of the Company may, at the discretion of the
Board of Directors or a duly designated compensation committee, be granted options to purchase
shares of common stock. The exercise price of each option granted was determined by the Board of
Directors at the date of grant, and options under the 1998 Plan expire no later than ten years from
the grant date. Options granted will generally become exercisable in accordance with the terms of
the agreement pursuant to which they were granted. Certain option grants to directors became
exercisable three months from the date of grant. Upon an acquisition of the Company by merger or
asset sale, each outstanding option may be subject to accelerated vesting under certain
circumstances. The 1998 Plan terminated on December 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2011, there were
228,510 outstanding options related to this Plan.
In October 2005, the Companys shareholders approved a stock option and incentive plan (the 2005
Plan) under which 2,400,000 shares of common stock were reserved for the issuance of awards,
including stock options, incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, unrestricted stock, restricted stock units, performance
shares, performance units (including performance options) and other share-based awards. The 2005
Plan provides that employees, directors and consultants of the Company may, at the discretion of
the Board of Directors or a duly designated compensation committee, be granted awards to acquire
shares of common stock. The exercise price of each option award shall be determined by the Board
of Directors at the date of grant in accordance with the terms of the 2005 Plan, and under the 2005
Plan awards expire no later than ten years from the grant date. Options granted will generally
become exercisable in accordance with the terms of the agreement pursuant to which they were
granted. Upon an acquisition of the Company by merger or asset sale, each outstanding option may
be subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances. The 2005 Plan terminates on May 25,
2015, unless terminated earlier by the Board of Directors. As of March 31, 2011, there were
470,268 outstanding options and 1,786,624 shares available for future grant related to this Plan.
A summary of stock option transactions during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as
follows:
Weighted- | Weighted- | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Remaining | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Price | Contractual | Value | |||||||||||||
Shares | per Share | Life (years) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2008 |
1,303,734 | $ | 22.81 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
298,331 | $ | 38.71 | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
(697,083 | ) | $ | 17.96 | $ | 17,182 | ||||||||||
Forfeited/Canceled |
(84,900 | ) | $ | 25.93 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2009 |
820,082 | $ | 32.39 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
289,484 | $ | 58.44 | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
(237,603 | ) | $ | 24.64 | $ | 8,254 | ||||||||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2010 |
871,963 | $ | 43.15 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||
Granted |
55,000 | $ | 58.29 | 7.3 | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
(153,714 | ) | $ | 37.19 | 2.0 | $ | 7,093 | |||||||||
Forfeited/Canceled |
(74,471 | ) | $ | 55.01 | 5.8 | |||||||||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2011 |
698,778 | $ | 44.40 | 3.9 | $ | 27,213 | ||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest, March 31, 2011 |
679,965 | $ | 44.21 | 3.9 | $ | 26,608 | ||||||||||
Exercisable, March 31, 2011 |
297,260 | $ | 36.66 | 2.3 | $ | 13,875 | ||||||||||
78
Table of Contents
The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 and utilizes the
Black-Scholes valuation model for estimating the fair value of share-based compensation with the
following assumptions:
Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||
Expected life |
4.2 years | 4.4 - 4.8 years | 4.0 years | |||||||||
Expected volatility |
42.6% - 44.7 | % | 45.5% - 47.7 | % | 42.0% - 46.7 | % | ||||||
Expected dividends |
1.9% - 2.2 | % | 1.9% - 2.2 | % | 2.9% - 3.5 | % | ||||||
Risk-free rate |
1.5% - 2.1 | % | 0.8% - 2.4 | % | 1.1% - 3.4 | % |
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended March
31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $18.48, $19.30 and $11.22 per share, respectively.
The Company issues new shares to satisfy option exercises. Based on historical experience of
option cancellations, the Company has estimated an annualized forfeiture rate of 3.6%,
1.7% and 1.9%
for employee
options for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and 0.0% for director options for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. Forfeiture rates will be adjusted over the requisite
service period when actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the estimate.
During the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, a total of 55,000, 289,484 and 298,331
options, respectively, were granted under the 2005 Plan at an exercise price equal to the market
price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. A summary of stock options granted under
the 2005 Plan during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
Number of | Vesting | |||||||||||
Option Grant Date | Shares | Exercise Price | Terms (1) | Expires | ||||||||
November 29, 2010 |
10,000 | $ | 64.32 | Five years | November 29, 2018 | |||||||
August 3, 2010 |
5,000 | $ | 55.24 | Five years | August 3, 2018 | |||||||
June 4, 2010 |
25,000 | $ | 56.29 | Five years | June 4, 2018 | |||||||
June 2, 2010 |
15,000 | $ | 58.62 | Five years | June 2, 2018 | |||||||
Fiscal year 2011 option grants |
55,000 | |||||||||||
February 16, 2010 |
118,059 | $ | 56.95 | Five years | February 16, 2018 | |||||||
February 16, 2010 |
3,000 | $ | 56.95 | Two years | February 16, 2013 | |||||||
December 7, 2009 |
63,425 | $ | 60.29 | Five years | December 7, 2017 | |||||||
November 30, 2009 |
75,000 | $ | 59.49 | Five years | November 30, 2017 | |||||||
September 17, 2009 |
30,000 | $ | 58.03 | Five years | September 17, 2017 | |||||||
Fiscal year 2010 option grants |
289,484 | |||||||||||
November 5, 2008 |
80,141 | $ | 42.20 | Four years | November 5, 2013 | |||||||
September 9, 2008 |
35,000 | $ | 45.61 | Four years | September 9, 2015 | |||||||
August 18, 2008 |
50,000 | $ | 40.08 | Four years | August 18, 2013 | |||||||
August 11, 2008 |
25,000 | $ | 40.71 | Four years | August 11, 2013 | |||||||
June 13, 2008 |
108,190 | $ | 32.79 | Four years | June 13, 2013 | |||||||
Fiscal year 2009 option grants |
298,331 |
(1) | Options vest in equal annual installments on each grant anniversary date beginning one year after the grant date. |
Performance-Based Awards
On May 26, 2010, the Board of Directors approved its fiscal year 2011 equity incentive program for
certain employees to be awarded options to purchase the Companys common stock. The maximum number
of options available under the equity incentive program plan is 280,000, of which 115,000 are
reserved for the Companys named executive officers and 165,000 for non-executive employees of the
Company. Under the program, executives are eligible to receive options based on meeting certain
target increases in earnings per share performance and revenue growth during fiscal year 2011.
Under the program, the non-executive employees are eligible to receive options based on satisfying
certain management established criteria and recommendations of senior management. The options
shall be issued pursuant to one of the Companys shareholder approved option plans, have an
exercise price equal to the closing price of the Companys shares on the date of grant, a term of
eight years and vesting in five equal annual installments commencing one year following the date of
grant.
79
Table of Contents
Compensation expense associated with the performance based awards under the Companys 2011
incentive plan are initially based on the number of options expected to vest after assessing the
probability that certain performance criteria will be met. Cumulative adjustments are recorded
quarterly to reflect subsequent changes in the estimated outcome of performance-related conditions.
The Company utilized the Black-Scholes option valuation model and recorded stock compensation
expense related to the performance based awards of approximately $788 during the year ended March
31, 2011 using the
assumptions below. During the year ended March 31, 2009, there was no stock compensation expense related to performance
based awards.
Year Ended | Year Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||
Expected life |
4.3 years | 4.4 years | ||||||
Expected volatility |
41.6 | % | 45.5 | % | ||||
Expected dividends |
1.5 | % | 2.2 | % | ||||
Risk-free rate |
2.2 | % | 2.3 | % |
Non-vested stock option award activity, including employee stock options and performance-based
awards, during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is summarized as follows:
Weighted- | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Non-Vested | Grant-Date | |||||||
Number of | Fair Value | |||||||
Shares | per Share | |||||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2008 |
649,436 | $ | 9.57 | |||||
Granted |
298,331 | $ | 11.22 | |||||
Vested |
(397,522 | ) | $ | 8.14 | ||||
Forfeited/Canceled |
(84,900 | ) | $ | 10.17 | ||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2009 |
465,345 | $ | 11.74 | |||||
Granted |
289,484 | $ | 19.30 | |||||
Vested |
(143,993 | ) | $ | 12.03 | ||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2010 |
610,836 | $ | 15.26 | |||||
Granted |
55,000 | $ | 18.48 | |||||
Vested |
(189,847 | ) | $ | 12.86 | ||||
Forfeited/Canceled |
(74,471 | ) | $ | 18.82 | ||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2011 |
401,518 | $ | 16.17 | |||||
As of March 31, 2011, $4,740 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 5.0 years. This amount does not
include the cost of new options that may be granted in future periods or any changes in the
Companys forfeiture percentage. The total fair value of options vested during the years ended
March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $2,442, $1,732 and $3,236, respectively.
Restricted Stock Units
On May 27, 2009, the Board of Directors approved its Outside Director Compensation Plan, whereby
each non-employee Director is to be awarded shares of restricted stock units upon election or
re-election to the Board. The restricted stock units are awarded under the 2005 Plan. Such
restricted stock units vest in two equal, annual installments on the first and second anniversaries
of the grant date and are nontransferable for one year following vesting. Upon each vesting of the
award, one share of common stock shall be issued for each restricted stock unit. The
weighted-average grant date fair value for the restricted stock units was estimated using the
market price of its common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of these restricted stock
units is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
80
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2011, 17,146 restricted stock units were issued and approximately $427 and $136 of
compensation expense was recorded under this Plan during the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
There were no restricted stock units issued during the year ended
March 31, 2009.
Restricted stock units award activity for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is
summarized as follows:
Weighted- | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Number of | Fair Value | |||||||
Shares | per Share | |||||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2009 |
| |||||||
Granted |
8,000 | $ | 53.86 | |||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2010 |
8,000 | $ | 53.86 | |||||
Granted |
9,146 | $ | 54.62 | |||||
Vested |
(5,698 | ) | $ | 54.43 | ||||
Outstanding, March 31, 2011 |
11,448 | $ | 54.18 | |||||
As of March 31, 2011, $368 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock
units is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years. This amount does
not include the cost of new restricted stock units that may be granted in future periods.
13. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies
Rental Commitments
The Company leases facilities and offices under irrevocable operating lease agreements expiring at
various dates through September 2016 with rent escalation clauses. Rent expense related to these
leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease terms. Rent expense for the years
ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $3,964, $4,264 and $3,560, respectively. Rental
commitments under these agreements are as follows:
Year ended March 31, |
||||
2012 |
$ | 5,137 | ||
2013 |
5,475 | |||
2014 |
5,424 | |||
2015 |
5,008 | |||
2016 and beyond |
5,697 | |||
$ | 26,741 | |||
Commitments and Guarantees
Software license agreements in both the QSI Dental Divisions and NextGen Division include a
performance guarantee that the Companys software products will substantially operate as described
in the applicable program documentation for a period of 365 days after delivery. To date, the
Company has not incurred any significant costs associated with its performance guarantee or other
related warranties and does not expect to incur significant warranty costs in the future.
Therefore, no accrual has been made for potential costs associated with these warranties. Certain
arrangements also include performance guarantees related to response time, availability for
operational use, and other performance-related guarantees. Certain arrangements also include
penalties in the form of maintenance credits should the performance of the software fail to meet
the performance guarantees. To date, the Company has not incurred any significant costs associated
with these warranties and does not expect to incur significant warranty costs in the future.
Therefore, no accrual has been made for potential costs associated with these warranties.
The Company has historically offered short-term rights of return in certain sales arrangements. If
the Company is able to estimate returns for these types of arrangements and all other criteria for
revenue recognition have been met, revenue is recognized and these arrangements are recorded in the
consolidated financial statements. If the Company is unable to estimate returns for these types of
arrangements, revenue is not recognized in the consolidated financial statements until the rights
of return expire, provided also, that all other criteria of revenue recognition have been met.
Certain standard sales agreements contain a money back guarantee providing for a performance
guarantee that is already part of the software license agreement as well as training and support.
The money back guarantee also warrants that the software will remain robust and flexible to
allow participation in the federal health incentive programs. The specific elements of the
performance guarantee pertain to aspects of the software, which the Company has already tested
and confirmed to consistently meet using the Companys existing software without any
modifications or enhancements. To date, the Company has not incurred any costs associated
with this guarantee and does not expect to incur significant costs in the future. Therefore, no
accrual has been made for potential costs associated with this guarantee.
The Companys standard sales agreements in the NextGen Division contain an indemnification
provision pursuant to which it shall indemnify, hold harmless, and reimburse the indemnified party
for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party in connection with any United States
patent, any copyright or other intellectual property infringement claim by any third-party with
respect to its software. The QSI Dental Division arrangements occasionally utilize this type of
language as well. As the Company has not incurred any significant costs to defend lawsuits or
settle claims related to these indemnification agreements, the Company believes that its estimated
exposure on these agreements is currently minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities
recorded for these indemnification obligations.
81
Table of Contents
The Company has entered into marketing assistance agreements with existing users of the Companys
products which provide the opportunity for those users to earn commissions if they host specific
site visits upon the Companys request for prospective clients that directly result in a purchase
of the Companys software by the visiting prospects. Amounts earned by existing users under this
program are treated as a selling expense in the period when earned.
Litigation
The Company has experienced certain legal claims by parties asserting that it has infringed certain
intellectual property rights. The Company believes that these claims are without merit and the
Company has defended them vigorously. However, in order to avoid the further legal costs and
diversion of management resources it is reasonably possible that a settlement may be reached which
could result in a liability to the Company. However, at this time it is not possible to estimate
with reasonable certainty what amount, if any, may be incurred as a result of a settlement.
Litigation is inherently uncertain and always difficult to predict.
14. Operating Segment Information
The Company has prepared operating segment information in accordance with ASC 280 to report
components that are evaluated regularly by its chief operating decision maker, or decision making
group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
During fiscal year 2011, as a result of certain organizational changes, the composition of the
Companys NextGen Division was revised to exclude the Companys inpatient solutions entities (Opus
and NextGen IS), both of which are now aggregated in the Companys Inpatient Solutions Division.
Following the reorganization, the Company now operates four reportable segments (not including
Corporate), comprised of the NextGen Division, the Inpatient Solutions Division, the QSI Dental
Division and the Practice Solutions Division.
Prior period segment results were revised accordingly to reflect the organizational changes. The
results of operations related to the fiscal year 2010 acquisitions of Opus and NextGen IS are now
included in the Inpatient Solutions Division. The results of operations related to the fiscal year
2009 acquisitions of HSI and PMP are included in the Practice Solutions Division.
The QSI Dental Division, co-located with the Companys corporate headquarters in Irvine,
California, currently focuses on developing, marketing and supporting software suites sold to
dental practices.
The NextGen Division, with headquarters in Horsham, Pennsylvania, provides integrated clinical,
financial and connectivity solutions for ambulatory and dental provider organizations.
The Inpatient Solutions Division, with its primary location in Austin, Texas, provides integrated
clinical, financial and connectivity solutions for rural and community hospitals.
The NextGen Division, with headquarters in Horsham, Pennsylvania, and significant locations in
Atlanta, Georgia and Austin, Texas, focuses principally on developing and marketing products and
services for medical practices.
The Practice Solutions Division, with locations in St. Louis, Missouri and Hunt Valley, Maryland,
focuses primarily on providing physician practices with RCM services, primarily billing and
collection services for medical practices. This Division combines a Web-delivered SaaS model and
the NextGenpm software platform to execute its service offerings.
The Divisions operate largely as stand-alone operations, with each Division maintaining its own
distinct product lines, product platforms, development, implementation and support teams, sales
staffing and branding. The Divisions share the resources of the Companys corporate office,
which includes a variety of accounting and other administrative functions. Additionally, there are
a small but growing number of clients who are simultaneously utilizing software or services from
more than one of the Divisions.
The accounting policies of the Companys operating segments are the same as those described in Note
2, except that the disaggregated financial results of the segments reflect allocation of certain
functional expense categories consistent with the basis and manner in which Company management
internally disaggregates financial information for the purpose of assisting in making internal
operating decisions. Certain corporate overhead costs, such as executive and accounting department
personnel-related expenses, are not allocated to the individual segments by management.
82
Table of Contents
Operating segment data is as follows:
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
$ | 19,966 | $ | 17,128 | $ | 15,851 | ||||||
NextGen Division |
266,546 | 228,730 | 203,954 | |||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
17,898 | 2,891 | | |||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
48,953 | 43,062 | 25,710 | |||||||||
Consolidated revenue |
$ | 353,363 | $ | 291,811 | $ | 245,515 | ||||||
Operating income: |
||||||||||||
QSI Dental Division |
$ | 4,672 | $ | 3,460 | $ | 3,385 | ||||||
NextGen Division |
104,391 | 87,432 | 81,323 | |||||||||
Inpatient Solutions Division |
5,362 | 676 | | |||||||||
Practice Solutions Division |
4,235 | 2,314 | 2,455 | |||||||||
Unallocated corporate expense |
(24,568 | ) | (18,158 | ) | (14,760 | ) | ||||||
Consolidated operating income |
$ | 94,092 | $ | 75,724 | $ | 72,403 | ||||||
Management evaluates performance based upon stand-alone segment operating income. Because the
Company does not evaluate performance based upon return on assets at the operating segment level,
assets are not tracked internally by segment. Therefore, segment asset information is not
presented.
All of the recorded goodwill at March 31, 2011 relates to the Companys NextGen Division, Inpatient
Solutions Division and Practice Solutions Division. The goodwill relating to the fiscal year 2009
acquisitions of HSI and PMP is recorded in the Practice Solutions Division. The goodwill relating
to the fiscal year 2010 acquisitions of Opus and NextGen IS is recorded in the Inpatient Solutions
Division. See Note 6.
15. Subsequent Events
On April 1, 2011, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (Agreement), with
IntraNexus, Inc. The purchase price consisted of cash consideration of $3,250 plus additional
contingent consideration to be made over a three year period as defined in the Agreement, not to
exceed $1,650.
On May 25, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.35 per share
on the Companys outstanding shares of common stock, payable to shareholders of record as of June
17, 2011 with an expected distribution date on or about July 5, 2011.
83
Table of Contents
16. Selected Quarterly Operating Results
The following table presents quarterly unaudited consolidated financial information for the eight
quarters preceding March 31, 2011. Such information is presented on the same basis as the annual
information presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In managements
opinion, this information reflects all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of
the results for these periods.
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | 06/30/09 | 09/30/09 | 12/31/09 | 03/31/10 | 06/30/10 | 09/30/10 | 12/31/10 | 03/31/11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Software, hardware and supplies |
$ | 17,776 | $ | 22,856 | $ | 24,346 | $ | 24,783 | $ | 24,756 | $ | 20,375 | $ | 29,675 | $ | 31,708 | ||||||||||||||||
Implementation and training services |
3,457 | 3,380 | 3,313 | 4,226 | 4,308 | 4,499 | 4,262 | 4,946 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
System sales |
21,233 | 26,236 | 27,659 | 29,009 | 29,064 | 24,874 | 33,937 | 36,654 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
21,640 | 21,475 | 22,139 | 23,938 | 25,536 | 27,529 | 27,908 | 29,046 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronic data interchange services |
8,161 | 8,796 | 8,897 | 9,181 | 9,764 | 10,142 | 10,360 | 10,756 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue cycle management and related services |
8,992 | 8,888 | 9,602 | 9,183 | 10,772 | 11,175 | 11,496 | 11,622 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other services |
6,612 | 6,303 | 6,665 | 7,202 | 7,791 | 7,737 | 8,170 | 9,030 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services |
45,405 | 45,462 | 47,303 | 49,504 | 53,863 | 56,583 | 57,934 | 60,454 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
66,638 | 71,698 | 74,962 | 78,513 | 82,927 | 81,457 | 91,871 | 97,108 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Software, hardware and supplies |
2,704 | 3,737 | 2,810 | 2,864 | 6,212 | 4,696 | 5,667 | 3,204 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implementation and training services |
2,881 | 3,296 | 2,898 | 2,908 | 2,990 | 3,475 | 3,677 | 4,868 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of system sales |
5,585 | 7,033 | 5,708 | 5,772 | 9,202 | 8,171 | 9,344 | 8,072 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
3,025 | 3,255 | 3,392 | 3,667 | 3,454 | 3,238 | 3,381 | 2,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronic data interchange services |
5,890 | 6,164 | 6,525 | 6,683 | 6,709 | 6,773 | 6,908 | 7,321 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue cycle management and related services |
6,522 | 6,856 | 7,124 | 7,213 | 8,145 | 8,222 | 8,715 | 8,733 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other services |
4,867 | 5,003 | 5,560 | 4,963 | 4,349 | 3,724 | 3,981 | 6,165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of maintenance, EDI, RCM and other services |
20,304 | 21,278 | 22,601 | 22,526 | 22,657 | 21,957 | 22,985 | 25,094 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of revenue |
25,889 | 28,311 | 28,309 | 28,298 | 31,859 | 30,128 | 32,329 | 33,166 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
40,749 | 43,387 | 46,653 | 50,215 | 51,068 | 51,329 | 59,542 | 63,942 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
20,093 | 20,061 | 21,574 | 25,223 | 26,238 | 24,829 | 27,958 | 29,285 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development costs |
3,977 | 4,346 | 3,954 | 4,269 | 5,456 | 5,232 | 5,358 | 5,751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
357 | 367 | 377 | 682 | 347 | 445 | 445 | 445 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
24,427 | 24,774 | 25,905 | 30,174 | 32,041 | 30,506 | 33,761 | 35,481 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
16,322 | 18,613 | 20,748 | 20,041 | 19,027 | 20,823 | 25,781 | 28,461 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
78 | 59 | 43 | 46 | 60 | 129 | 55 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
58 | | 136 | 74 | (6 | ) | 65 | | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
16,458 | 18,672 | 20,927 | 20,161 | 19,081 | 21,017 | 25,836 | 28,482 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
6,112 | 6,852 | 7,775 | 7,100 | 6,989 | 7,587 | 8,305 | 9,929 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 10,346 | $ | 11,820 | $ | 13,152 | $ | 13,061 | $ | 12,092 | $ | 13,430 | $ | 17,531 | $ | 18,553 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic* |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted* |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
28,492 | 28,597 | 28,667 | 28,784 | 28,896 | 28,935 | 28,978 | 29,005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
28,635 | 28,742 | 28,833 | 28,929 | 29,057 | 29,078 | 29,140 | 29,202 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.35 |
* | Quarterly EPS may not sum to annual EPS due to rounding |
84
Table of Contents
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Additions | Balance at | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Beginning of | Charged to Costs | End of | |||||||||||||
For the year ended | Year | and Expenses | Deductions | Year | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 |
$ | 4,489 | $ | 3,780 | $ | (1,552 | ) | $ | 6,717 | |||||||
March 31, 2010 |
$ | 3,877 | $ | 3,465 | $ | (2,853 | ) | $ | 4,489 | |||||||
March 31, 2009 |
$ | 2,528 | $ | 2,089 | $ | (740 | ) | $ | 3,877 |
Allowance for Inventory Obsolescence | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Additions | Balance at | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Beginning of | Charged to Costs | End of | |||||||||||||
For the year ended | Year | and Expenses | Deductions | Year | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 |
$ | 237 | $ | 27 | $ | | $ | 264 | ||||||||
March 31, 2010 |
$ | 210 | $ | 27 | $ | | $ | 237 | ||||||||
March 31, 2009 |
$ | 223 | $ | | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 210 |
85
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
21
|
List of subsidiaries. | |
23.1
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. | |
23.2
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Grant Thornton LLP. | |
31.1
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS*
|
XBRL Instance | |
101.SCH*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | |
101.CAL*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation | |
101.LAB*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label | |
101.PRE*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation |
* | XBRL information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of section 11 or 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these section. |
86