NextPlat Corp - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)

		Page No.
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	5
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.	6
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	18
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	25
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures.	26

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	26
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	26
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	26
Item 3.	Default upon Senior Securities.	26
Item 4.	REMOVED AND RESERVED	26
Item 5.	Other Information.	26
Item 6.	Exhibits.	26

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

Unless specifically set forth to the contrary, "Eclips," "we," "us," "our" and similar terms refer to EClips Media Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and subsidiary.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	19,827		$	-
Prepaid expenses		234,925			-
Debt issuance cost		8,332
Assets of discontinued operations		92,716			-

Total Current Assets		355,800			-

OTHER ASSETS:
Property and equipment, net		34,222			-
Deposits		8,509			-

Total Assets	$	398,531		$	-

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	105,371		$	-
Derivative liabilities		2,252,276			67,147
Liabilities of discontinued operations		554,921			167,686

Total current liabilities		2,912,568			234,833

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Convertible debentures, net of debt discount		226,667			7,620

Total Liabilities		3,139,235			242,453

Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 10,000,000 authorized Series A, 3,000,000 issued and outstanding		300			300
Series B, none issued and outstanding		-			-
Series C, none issued and outstanding		-			-
Series D, none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock; $.0001 par value; 750,000,000 shares authorized; 205,025,338 and 129,725,338 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		20,503			12,972
Additional paid-in capital		28,687,154			24,224,685
Accumulated deficit		(31,448,661	)		(24,480,410	)

Total Stockholders' Deficit		(2,740,704	)		(242,453	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	398,531		$	-

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)

Net revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

Operating expenses:
Payroll expense and stock based compensation		101,875			93,882			969,167			756,311
Professional and consulting		74,912			72,014			2,808,623			203,642
General and administrative expenses		37,468			68,607			278,137			185,900

Total operating expenses		214,255			234,503			4,055,927			1,145,853

Loss from continuing operations		(214,255	)		(234,503	)		(4,055,927	)		(1,145,853	)

Other income (expense)
Interest income		-			-			2,157			-
Interest expense		(145,286	)		(527	)		(258,974	)		(3,027	)
Derivative liability expense		-			-			(3,260,076	)		-
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(366,480	)		-			2,032,567			-

Total other income (expense)		(511,766	)		(527	)		(1,484,326	)		(3,027	)

Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes		(726,021	)		(235,030	)		(5,540,253	)		(1,148,880	)

Provision for income taxes		-			-			-			-

Loss from continuing operations		(726,021	)		(235,030	)		(5,540,253	)		(1,148,880	)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		(1,421,064	)		(17,687	)		(1,427,998	)		(112,328	)

Net loss available to common shareholders	$	(2,147,085	)	$	(252,717	)	$	(6,968,251	)	$	(1,261,208	)


Loss per common share, basic and diluted:
Loss from continuing operations	$	-		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.25	)
Loss from discontinued operations	$	0.01		$	-		$	0.01		$	0.02

	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.27	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding		204,825,336			11,946,924			172,920,939			4,605,873

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(5,540,253	)	$	(1,148,880	)

Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operations to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		3,254			-
Amortization of prepaid expenses		13,108			-
Amortization of debt issuance costs		4,168			-
Amortization of debt discount		226,667			-
Impairment loss		173,257			-
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(2,032,567	)		-
Derivative liablity expense		3,260,076			-
Stock based consulting		2,650,000			656,962
Stock based compensation expense		879,167			-
Contributed services		10,000			-

(Increase) Decrease in:
Interest receivable		(2,157	)		-
Prepaid expense		(192,200	)		-
Deposits		(8,509	)		-

Increase (Decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(31,531	)		-

Net cash used in continuing operations		(587,520	)		(491,918	)

Loss from discontinued operations		(1,427,998	)		(112,328	)

Adjustments to reconcile loss from discontinued operations to net cash provided by discontinued operating activities:

Amortization		233			129,227
Impairment loss		1,043,038			-
(Increase) decrease in discontinued assets		(89,086	)		(76,715	)
Increase (decrease) in discontinued liabilities		382,179			226,088

Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations		(91,634	)		166,272

Net cash used in operating activities		(679,154	)		(325,646	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash acquired in acquisition		5,057			-
Cash used in acquisition		(110,000	)		-
Payment of leasehold improvement		(14,025	)		-
Purchase of equipment		(23,451	)		(787	)
Investment in note receivable		(171,100	)		-

Net cash used in investing activities		(313,519	)		(787	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		75,000			344,899
Net proceeds from debentures		937,500			-

Net cash provided by financing activities		1,012,500			344,899

Net increase in cash		19,827			18,466

Cash, beginning of period		-			370

Cash, end of period	$	19,827		$	18,836

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	-		$	6,095
Income Taxes	$	-		$	-

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition of business	$	800,000		$	-
Conversion of debt to equity (preferred stock)	$	-		$	58,257
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock	$	-		$	7,250,000

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and Description of Business

The Company merged with a private Florida corporation known as World Energy Solutions, Inc. effective August 17, 2005. Advanced 3D Ultrasound Services, Inc. (“A3D”) remained as the surviving entity as the legal acquirer, and the Company was the accounting acquirer. On November 7, 2005, the Company changed its name to World Energy Solutions, Inc. (“WESI”). On November 7, 2005, WESI merged with Professional Technical Systems, Inc. (“PTS”). WESI remained as the surviving entity as the legal acquirer, while PTS was the accounting acquirer. On February 26, 2009, the Company changed its name to EClips Energy Technologies, Inc.

On December 22, 2009, in a private equity transaction (“Purchase Agreement”), the majority shareholder (the “Seller”) and Chief Executive of the Company entered into agreement, whereby certain purchasers collectively purchased from the Seller an aggregate of (i) 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company and (ii) 1,500,000 shares of series D preferred stock, $0.001 par value (the “Preferred Stock”), comprising approximately 82 % of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company, for the aggregate purchase price, including expenses, of $100,000.

In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company and Seller entered into a release pursuant to which in consideration for the termination of Seller’s employment agreement, dated January 31, 2006, the Company issued to Seller 1,100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Furthermore, the Company agreed to transfer to Seller or Seller’s designee, the Company’s subsidiaries Pure Air Technologies, Inc., Hydrogen Safe Technologies, Inc., World Energy Solutions Limited and Advanced Alternative Energy, Inc. and granted to Seller a five-year option for the purchase of H-Hybrid Technologies, Inc.

On March 16, 2010, the Company filed a definitive information statement on Schedule 14C (the “Definitive Schedule 14C”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) notifying its stockholders that on March 2, 2010, a majority of the voting capital stock of the Company took action in lieu of a special meeting of stockholders authorizing the Company to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with its newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, EClips Media Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation for the purpose of changing the state of incorporation of the Company to Delaware from Florida. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company merged with and into EClips Media with EClips Media continuing as the surviving corporation on April 21, 2010. On the effective date of the Merger, (i) each issued and outstanding share of common stock of the Company shall be converted into two (2) shares of EClips Media common stock, (ii) each issued and outstanding share of Series D preferred stock of the Company shall be converted into two (2) shares of EClips Media Series A preferred stock and (iii) the outstanding share of EClips Media Common Stock held by the Company shall be retired and canceled and shall resume the status of authorized and unissued EClips Media common stock. The outstanding 6% convertible debentures of the Company shall be assumed by EClips Media and converted into outstanding 6% convertible debentures of EClips Media. All options and rights to acquire the Company’s common stock, and all outstanding warrants or rights outstanding to purchase the Company’s common stock, will automatically be converted into equivalent options, warrants and rights to purchase two (2) times the number of shares of EClips Media common stock at fifty (50%) percent of the exercise, conversion or strike price of such converted options, warrants and rights. Trading of the Company’s securities on a 2:1 basis commenced May 17, 2010 upon approval of the FINRA. All shares and per share values are retroactively stated at the effective date of merger.

On June 21, 2010, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary SD Acquisition Corp., a New York corporation (“SD”), acquired (the “Acquisition”) all of the business and assets and assumed certain liabilities of Brand Interaction Group, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company which is described below.

In September 2010, the Company decided to discontinue the operations of SD acquisition Corp. because of the disappointing performance and negative results of its most recent fantasy league event in August 2010. The Company has agreed in principal to enter into a spin off agreement (the “Spinoff”) with Brand Interaction Group, LLC (“BIG”) and Mr. Eric Simon, the Company’s former CEO, pursuant to which the Company will return the Superdraft business to Mr. Simon by exchanging 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of SD Acquisition Corp., which owned and operated the Superdraft business, for the cancellation of 30,000,000 shares of the Company owned by Mr. Simon and BIG, the cancellation of the Asset Purchase Agreement and Employment Agreement entered into between the Company, Mr. Simon and BIG in June 2010. In addition, BIG will make certain payments to some of the Company’s noteholders which would reduce, on a dollar for dollar basis, amounts due and payable by the Company to such noteholders. The Spinoff remains subject to revision.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Acquisition of Business of Brand Interaction Group, LLC

On June 21, 2010, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SD and Brand Interaction Group, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability (“BIG”). Pursuant to which , the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary SD acquired all of the business and assets and assumed certain liabilities of BIG owned by Eric Simon , the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). BIG owned Fantasy Football SUPERDRAFTTM, and operates as a sports entertainment and media business focused on promotion of fantasy league events through live events hosted in various venues such as Las Vegas, and online, which feature sports and media personalities, and the sale and marketing of various sports oriented products and services.

As consideration for the Acquisition by SD, the Company agreed to issue BIG 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $0.04 per share (applying FASB ASC 805 “Determination of the Measurement Date for the Market Price of Acquirer Securities Issued in a Purchase Business Combination” ). The total purchase price was $868,152and includes common stock valued at $800,000 and incurred legal fees of $68,152. Additionally, in May 2010, the Company issued a demand promissory note agreement and security agreement in the amount of $110,000 with BIG and such promissory note is included in the liabilities assumed and has been recognized as intercompany transaction following the acquisition. Thus such intercompany transaction has been eliminated in consolidation. The purchase price was allocated as follows:

Assets Acquired
Cash	$	5,057

Intangible
Trademark	3,863
Goodwill	1,043,038
Total assets acquired	1,051,958

Liabilities Assumed	183,806

Net assets acquired	$	868,152

Since the Company decided to discontinue the operations of SD acquisition Corp., the Company deemed the acquired goodwill to be impaired and wrote-off the goodwill during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment of goodwill of $1,043,038 in the accompanying statement of operations.

Discontinued Operations

The Company’s operations were developing and manufacturing products and services, which reduce fuel costs, save power & energy and protect the environment. The products and services were made available for sale into markets in the public and private sectors. In December 2009, the Company discontinued these operations and disposed of certain of its subsidiaries, and prior periods have been restated in the Company’s financial statements and related footnotes to conform to this presentation. Additionally, in September 2010, the Company decided to discontinue the operations of SD acquisition Corp. because of the disappointing performance and negative results of its most recent fantasy league event in August 2010.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The remaining assets and liabilities of discontinued operations are presented in the balance sheet under the caption “Assets of discontinued operation" and “Liabilities of discontinued operation". The carrying amounts of the major classes of these liabilities as of September 30, 2010 are summarized as follows:

	September 30,
	2010
Assets:
Cash	$	29,086
Receivables		60,000
Other assets		3,630

Assets of discontinued operations	$	92,716

Liabilities
Accounts payables and accrued expenses	$	(370,988	)
Due to related party		(183,933	)

Liabilities of discontinued operations	$	554,921

The following table sets forth for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, indicated selected financial data of the Company's discontinued operations.

	September 30, 2010			September 30, 2009
Revenues	$	178,645		$	260,992
Cost of sales		381,331			189,450
Gross (loss) profit		(202,686	)		71,542
Operating and other non-operating expenses		1,225,312			183,870

Loss from discontinued operations	$	(1,427,998	)	$	(112,328	)

Basis of presentation

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("US GAAP"). The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in the Company’s Form 10-K at December 31, 2009.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position as of September 30, 2010, and the results of operations and cash flows for the nine months ending September 30, 2010 have been included. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

ASB Accounting Standards Codification

The issuance by the FASB of the Accounting Standards CodificationTM (the “Codification”) on July 1, 2009 (effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009), changes the way that GAAP is referenced. Beginning on that date, the Codification officially became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP; however, SEC registrants must also consider rules, regulations, and interpretive guidance issued by the SEC or its staff. The change affects the way the Company refers to GAAP in financial statements and in its accounting policies. All existing standards that were used to create the Codification became superseded. Instead, references to standards consist solely of the number used in the Codification’s structural organization.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Use of Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statements of financial condition, and revenues and expenses for the years then ended. Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates. Significant estimates made by management include, but are not limited to, the assumptions used to calculate stock-based compensation, derivative liabilities, debt discount, the useful life of property and equipment, purchase price fair value allocation for the business acquisition, valuation and amortization periods of intangible asset, and valuation and impairment of goodwill.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the 2009 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on the reported net loss.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company places its cash with a high credit quality financial institution. The Company’s account at this institution is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $250,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company has not reached bank balances exceeding the FDIC insurance limit. To reduce its risk associated with the failure of such financial institution, the Company evaluates at least annually the rating of the financial institution in which it holds deposits.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents accounts are held at financial institutions and are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $100,000 between January 2007 and October 2008 and $250,000 for interest-bearing accounts and an unlimited amount for noninterest-bearing accounts after October 2008. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company has not reached bank balances exceeding the FDIC insurance limit. While the Company periodically evaluates the credit quality of the financial institutions in which it holds deposits, it cannot reasonably alleviate the risk associated with the sudden failure of such financial institutions. The Company's investment policy is to invest in low risk, highly liquid investments. The Company does not believe it is exposed to any significant credit risk in its cash investment.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing generally accepted accounting principles that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or operating results, but did expand certain disclosures.

ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized below:

	Level 1:	Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
	Level 2:	Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data
	Level 3:	Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

Cash and cash equivalents include money market securities that are considered to be highly liquid and easily tradable as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. These securities are valued using inputs observable in active markets for identical securities and are therefore classified as Level 1 within our fair value hierarchy.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their estimated fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of the convertible debentures at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximate their respective fair value based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate.

In addition, FASB ASC 825-10-25 Fair Value Option was effective for January 1, 2008. ASC 825-10-25 expands opportunities to use fair value measurements in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The Company did not elect the fair value options for any of its qualifying financial instruments.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost. The cost of repairs and maintenance is expensed as incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are included in income in the year of disposition. The Company examines the possibility of decreases in the value of fixed assets when events or changes in circumstances reflect the fact that their recorded value may not be recoverable. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-Lived Assets of the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable, pursuant to guidance established in ASC 360-10-35-15, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” . The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value. In September 2010, the Company decided to discontinue the operations of SD acquisition Corp. because of the disappointing performance and negative results of its most recent fantasy league event in August 2010. Accordingly, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company has determined that an adjustment to the carrying value of goodwill was required. The Company recorded an impairment of goodwill of $1,043,038 in the accompanying statement of operations.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as prescribed by ASC Topic 740: Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities, and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance, when in the Company's opinion it is likely that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Pursuant to ASC Topic 740-10: Income Taxes related to the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, the evaluation of a tax position is a two-step process. The first step is to determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of any related appeals or litigation based on the technical merits of that position. The second step is to measure a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not threshold to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. A tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent period in which the threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not criteria should be de-recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which the threshold is no longer met. The accounting standard also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition. The adoption had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Stock Based Compensation

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FASB ASC Topic 718: Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). Under ASC 718, companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. Companies may elect to apply this statement either prospectively, or on a modified version of retrospective application under which financial statements for prior periods are adjusted on a basis consistent with the pro forma disclosures required for those periods under ASC 718. Upon adoption of ASC 718, the Company elected to value employee stock options using the Black-Scholes option valuation method that uses assumptions that relate to the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock, the expected dividend yield of our stock, the expected life of the options and the risk free interest rate. Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods or period of service of the option grant. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not grant any stock options.

Related Parties

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties that, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. The Company discloses all related party transactions. All transactions shall be recorded at fair value of the goods or services exchanged. Property purchased from a related party is recorded at the cost to the related party and any payment to or on behalf of the related party in excess of the cost is reflected as a distribution to related party.

Subsequent Events

For purposes of determining whether a post-balance sheet event should be evaluated to determine whether it has an effect on the financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, subsequent events were evaluated by the Company as of the date on which the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, were available to be issued.

Net Loss per Common Share

Net loss per common share are calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 260: Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”). Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net earnings per share does not include dilutive common stock equivalents in the weighted average shares outstanding as they would be anti-dilutive. The outstanding warrants and shares equivalent issuable pursuant to embedded conversion features amounted to 82,000,000 at September 30, 2010. There were no dilutive common stock equivalents as of September 30, 2009.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” an amendment to ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” This amendment requires an entity to: (i) disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers and (ii) present separate information for Level 3 activity pertaining to gross purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. ASU No. 2010-06 is effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2009, with one new disclosure effective after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the results of operations and financial condition.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

In February 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for, and disclosure of, subsequent events in an entity’s consolidated financial statements. This standard amends the authoritative guidance for subsequent events that was previously issued and among other things exempts Securities and Exchange Commission registrants from the requirement to disclose the date through which it has evaluated subsequent events for either original or restated financial statements. This standard does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the scope of other applicable GAAP that provides different guidance on the accounting treatment for subsequent events or transactions. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. ASU 2010-20 requires additional disclosures about the credit quality of a company’s loans and the allowance for loan losses held against those loans. Companies will need to disaggregate new and existing disclosures based on how it develops its allowance for loan losses and how it manages credit exposures. Additional disclosure is also required about the credit quality indicators of loans by class at the end of the reporting period, the aging of past due loans, information about troubled debt restructurings, and significant purchases and sales of loans during the reporting period by class. The new guidance is effective for interim- and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company anticipates that adoption of these additional disclosures will not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATIONS

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. At September 30, 2010, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $31,448,661, and a working capital deficiency of $2,556,768. Additionally, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company incurred net losses of $6,968,251 and had negative cash flows from operations in the amount of $679,154. In addition, from the time the Company decided to discontinue the operations of SD Aquisition Corp., the Company has not commence any active operations. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon increasing sales and obtaining additional capital and financing. Management intends to attempt to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.

NOTE 3 – NOTE RECEIVABLE

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company entered into a secured 6% demand promissory note (the “Demand Note”) with RootZoo, Inc. (“RZ”). RZ owned and operated a website www.rootzoo.com, focused upon providing social networking to sports fans, statistics and commentary to the sports community. During the fourth quarter of 2009 the Company had entered into negotiations with the then fifty (50%) percent owner of the common stock of RZ and one of its then two directors (the “RZ Part Owner”) to acquire RZ pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “RZ Acquisition”), but negotiations for the RZ Acquisition broke down and have since been terminated. As a result of the discontinuance of all negotiations for the RZ Acquisition, the Company elected to foreclose on its loan and to acquire the RZ business under its foreclosed loan agreement. On May 15, 2010 the Company demanded repayment of all outstanding amounts under the Demand Note. On June 6, 2010, RZ entered into a Peaceful Possession Letter Agreement with the Company pursuant to which RZ granted the Company all rights of possession in and to the collateral which secures the Demand Note, representing substantially all of the assets of RZ in partial satisfaction with the Demand Note debt. Subsequently the Company, through an Assignment Agreement, assigned the rights and possession of the collateral to its subsidiary, RZ Acquisition Corp. Following termination of negotiations, all of the persons associated with the development of the RZ business resigned. RZ presently has no employees or others who perform services necessary to maintain and develop RZ business successfully. Due to the termination of negotiations, the Company believes that the assets of RZ has no value and worthless. Consequently, the Company recorded a total impairment loss of $173,257 which represents the principal amount of $171,100 and interest receivable of $2,157 in connection with the secured 6% demand promissory note agreement. Such amount is included in the accompanying statements of operations under general and administrative expenses.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

	Estimated life	September 30, 2010
Computer Equipment	3 years	$	4,067
Office Equipment	5 years		8,142
Furniture and fixtures	5 years		11,242
Leasehold improvements	5 years		14,025
			37,476
Less: Accumulated depreciation			(3,254)
		$	34,222

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company paid for leasehold improvements of $14,025 on a facility lease by an affiliated company for which our former Chief Executive officer and director, Greg Cohen, is the President. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, depreciation expense amounted to $3,254 and $0, respectively.

NOTE 5 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

Instruments with down-round protection are not considered indexed to a company's own stock under ASC Topic 815, because neither the occurrence of a sale of common stock by the company at market nor the issuance of another equity-linked instrument with a lower strike price is an input to the fair value of a fixed-for-fixed option on equity shares.

ASC Topic 815 guidance is to be applied to outstanding instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the Issue is applied. The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle shall be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity) for that fiscal year, presented separately. If an instrument is classified as debt, it is valued at fair value, and this value is re-measured on an ongoing basis, with changes recorded on the statement of operations in each reporting period. The Company did not have outstanding instruments with down-round provisions as of the beginning of fiscal 2009 thus no adjustment will be made to the opening balance of retained earnings.

In connection with the issuance of the 6% Senior Convertible Debentures, the Company has determined that the terms of the convertible debenture include a down-round provision under which the conversion price could be affected by future equity offerings undertaken by the Company until the 18 month anniversary of such convertible debenture. Accordingly, the convertible instrument is accounted for as a liability at the date of issuance and adjusted to fair value through earnings at each reporting date. The Company has recognized a derivative liability of $ $2,252,276 and $67,147 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Derivative liability expense and the gain resulting from the decrease in fair value of this convertible instrument was $3,260,076 and $2,032,567 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Derivative liability expense and the loss resulting from the increase in fair value of this convertible instrument was $0 and $366,480 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 5 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES (continued)

The Company used the following assumptions for determining the fair value of the convertible instruments granted under the Black-Scholes option pricing model:

	September 30, 2010

Expected volatility		184% - 236%
Expected term		1.20-5 Years
Risk-free interest rate		0.27%-2.62%
Expected dividend yield		0%

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES

On December 17, 2009, to obtain funding for working capital, the Company entered into securities purchase agreement with an accredited investor pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue its 6% Senior Convertible Debentures for an aggregate purchase price of $75,000. The Debenture bears interest at 6% per annum and matures twenty-four months from the date of issuance. The Debenture will be convertible at the option of the holder at any time into shares of common stock, at an initial conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.05 per share or (ii) until the eighteen (18) months anniversary of the Debenture, the lowest price paid per share or the lowest conversion price per share in a subsequent sale of the Company’s equity and/or convertible debt securities paid by investors after the date of the Debenture.

On February 4, 2010 the Company entered into securities purchase agreement with an accredited investor pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue $200,000 of its 6% convertible debentures for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000. The Debenture bears interest at 6% per annum and matures twenty-four months from the date of issuance. The Debenture is convertible at the option of the holder at any time into shares of common stock, at an initial conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.05 per share or (ii) until the eighteen (18) months anniversary of the Debenture, the lowest price paid per share or the lowest conversion price per share in a subsequent sale of the Company’s equity and/or convertible debt securities paid by investors after the date of the Debenture. In connection with the Agreement, the Investor received a warrant to purchase 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Warrant is exercisable for a period of five years from the date of issuance at an initial exercise price of $0.05, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The Investor may exercise the Warrant on a cashless basis if the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Warrant) of one share of common stock is greater than the Initial Exercise Price. In accordance with ASC 470-20-25, the convertible debentures were considered to have an embedded beneficial conversion feature because the effective conversion price was less than the fair value of the Company’s common stock. These convertible debentures were fully convertible at the issuance date thus the value of the beneficial conversion and the warrants were treated as a discount on the 6% Senior Convertible debentures and were valued at $200,000 to be amortized over the debenture term. The fair value of this warrant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following weighted-average assumptions: expected dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 219%; risk-free interest rate of 2.29% and an expected holding period of five years. The Company paid a legal fee of $12,500 in connection with this debenture. Accordingly, the Company recorded debt issuance cost of $12,500 which will be amortized over the term of the debenture. As of September 30, 2010, amortization of debt issuance cost amounted to $4,168 and is included in interest expense. As a result of the Merger with EClips Media on March 16, 2010, the new conversion price of this debenture is equivalent to $0.025 and the warrants increased to 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On February 4, 2010, the Company amended the 6% Senior Convertible Debentures agreement dated December 17, 2009. Pursuant to the terms of the original agreement, the investor was granted the right to receive the benefit of any more favorable terms or provisions provided to subsequent investors for a period of 18 months following the closing of the transaction. As a result of the issuance of the $200,000 note payable above, the investor was issued a Debenture in the aggregate principal amount of $75,000 and received a warrant to purchase 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the same terms and conditions as previously described. The original Debenture was cancelled. These warrants were treated as an additional discount on the 6% Senior Convertible debentures amounting to $7,610 to be amortized over the debenture term. The fair value of this warrant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following weighted-average assumptions: expected dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 219%; risk-free interest rate of 2.29% and an expected holding period of five years. As a result of the Merger with EClips Media on March 16, 2010, the new conversion price of this debenture is equivalent to $0.025 and the warrants increased to 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES (continued)

Between March 2010 and June 2010, the Company entered into securities purchase agreements with accredited investors pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of $750,000 of its 6% Senior Convertible Debentures with the same terms and conditions of the debentures issued on February 4, 2010. In connection with the Agreement, the Investor received warrants to purchase 30,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Warrant is exercisable for a period of five years from the date of issuance at an initial exercise price of $0.025, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. In accordance with ASC 470-20-25, the convertible debentures were considered to have an embedded beneficial conversion feature because the effective conversion price was less than the fair value of the Company’s common stock. These convertible debentures were fully convertible at the issuance date thus the value of the beneficial conversion and the warrants were treated as a discount on the 6% Senior Convertible debentures and were valued at $750,000 to be amortized over the debenture term. The fair value of this warrant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following weighted-average assumptions: expected dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 211%; risk-free interest rate of 2.43% and an expected holding period of five years.

On March 16, 2010, the Company filed the Definitive Schedule 14C with the SEC notifying its stockholders that on March 2, 2010, a majority of the voting capital stock of the Company took action in lieu of a special meeting of stockholders authorizing the Company to enter into the Merger Agreement with its newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, EClips Media Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation for the purpose of changing the state of incorporation of the Company to Delaware from Florida. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company merged with and into EClips Media with EClips Media continuing as the surviving corporation on April 21, 2010. As a result of the Merger with EClips Media, the outstanding 6% convertible debentures of the Company were assumed by EClips Media and converted into outstanding 6% convertible debentures of EClips Media. All options and rights to acquire the Company’s Common Stock, and all outstanding warrants or rights outstanding to purchase the Company’s Common Stock, automatically converted into equivalent options, warrants and rights to purchase two (2) times the number of shares of EClips Media Common Stock at fifty (50%) percent of the exercise, conversion or strike price of such converted options, warrants and rights.

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, convertible debentures consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Long-term convertible debentures	$	1,025,000		$	75,000

Less: debt discount		(798,333	)		(67,380	)

Long-term convertible debentures – net	$	226,667		$	7,620

Total amortization of debt discounts for the convertible debentures amounted to $226,667 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, and is included in interest expense. Accrued interest as of September 30, 2010 amounted to $27,415.

In accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”, these convertible debentures include a down-round provision under which the conversion price could be affected by future equity offerings (see Note 5). Instruments with down-round protection are not considered indexed to a company's own stock under ASC Topic 815, because neither the occurrence of a sale of common stock by the company at market nor the issuance of another equity-linked instrument with a lower strike price is an input to the fair value of a fixed-for-fixed option on equity shares.

NOTE 7 - STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Capital Structure

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 7 - STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT (continued)

On the effective date of the Merger, (i) each issued and outstanding share of Common Stock of the Company shall be converted into two (2) shares of EClips Media Common Stock, (ii) each issued and outstanding share of Series D Preferred Stock of the Company shall be converted into two (2) shares of EClips Media Series A Preferred Stock and (iii) the outstanding share of EClips Media Common Stock held by the Company shall be retired and canceled and shall resume the status of authorized and unissued EClips Media Common Stock. All shares and per share values are retroactively stated at the effective date of merger. Except as otherwise noted, amounts set forth as of September 30, 2010 reflects the effect of the merger.

The authorized capital of EClips Media consists of 750,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share of which 3,000,000 shares have been designated as series A Preferred Stock.

Common stock

On February 4, 2010, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Colonial Ventures, LLC (the “Consultant”), a company controlled by Chairman and former CEO of the Company. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company shall pay Consultant $10,000 per month during the term of the Agreement (the “Base Compensation”). The Company issued 5,000,000 shares (10,000,000 post-merger) pursuant to this consulting agreement, 50% of which vested upon execution of the Agreement and the remaining 50% of which will vest on the one year anniversary of the Agreement as long as the Consultant is still engaged by the Company and Designated Person is still serving as chief executive officer or as a member of the board of directors of the Company. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.115 per share or $575,000. In connection with the issuance of these shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded stock based compensation of $479,167 and prepaid expense of $95,833 to be amortized over the service or vesting period.

On February 5, 2010 the Company issued an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares (12,000,000 post-merger) of the Company’s common stock of the Company to two persons for consulting services rendered. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.115 per share or $690,000. In connection with the issuance of these shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded stock based consulting of $690,000.

On April 15, 2010 the Company issued an aggregate of 24,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock of the Company to two consultants for consulting services rendered. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.08 per share or $1,920,000. In connection with the issuance of these shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded stock based consulting of $1,920,000.

On June 21, 2010, in connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement with BIG, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $0.04 per share or $800,000. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant based on the recent selling price of the Company’s common stock.

Pursuant to an Employment Agreement dated on June 21, 2010 the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.04 per share or $400,000. In connection with the issuance of these shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded stock based compensation of $400,000.

In July 2010, in connection with the sale of the Company’s common stock, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $75,000.

ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2010

NOTE 8 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On February 4, 2010, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Colonial Ventures, LLC (the “Consultant”), a company controlled by Chairman and former CEO of the Company. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company shall pay Consultant $10,000 per month during the term of the Agreement (the “Base Compensation”). The Company issued 5,000,000 shares (10,000,000 post-merger) pursuant to this consulting agreement, 50% of which vested upon execution of the Agreement and the remaining 50% of which will vest on the one year anniversary of the Agreement as long as the Consultant is still engaged by the Company and Designated Person is still serving as chief executive officer or as a member of the board of directors of the Company. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company paid $80,000 in cash to this consultant. Compensation in the amount of $10,000 was recorded to additional paid-in capital for contributed services provided by such consultant in September 2010.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company paid leasehold improvements and rent of $14,025 and $12,486, respectively on a facility lease by an affiliated company for which our former Chief Executive officer and director, Greg Cohen, is the President.

NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS

Consulting Agreement

On June 24, 2010 the Company engaged Brooke Capital Investments, LLC (“Brooke”) to perform certain investor relations, branding and media relations services for the Company for a 12 month period (the “Consulting Agreement”). The Company shall pay to Brooke an amount equal to $150,000, in cash, on the date of execution of this Agreement. This Agreement may not be terminated during the term and under no circumstance is Brooke under any obligation to return all or any portion of the Consulting Fee to the Company. In connection with this consulting agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded investor relations expense of $40,000 and prepaid expense of $110,000 to be amortized over the term of this agreement.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including those relating to our liquidity, our belief that we will not have sufficient cash and borrowing capacity to meet our working capital needs for the next 12 months without further financing, our expectations regarding acquisitions and new lines of business, gross profit, gross margins and capital expenditures, Additionally, words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes,” “will” and similar words are used to identify forward-looking statements.

Some or all of the results anticipated by these forward-looking statements may not occur. Important factors, uncertainties and risks that may cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the Risk Factors which appear in our filings and reports made with the Securities and Exchange Commission, our lack of working capital, the value of our securities, the impact of competition, the continuation or worsening of current economic conditions, technology and technological changes, a potential decrease in consumer spending and the condition of the domestic and global credit and capital markets. Additionally, these forward-looking statements are presented as of the date this Form 10-Q is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not intend to update any of these forward-looking statements.

Overview

The Company was incorporated under the name “Swifty Carwash & Quick-Lube, Inc.” in the state of Florida on September 25, 1997. On October 22, 1999, the Company changed its name from “Swifty Carwash & Quick-Lube, Inc.” to “SwiftyNet.com, Inc.” On January 29, 2001, the Company changed its name from “SwiftyNet.com, Inc.” to “Yseek, Inc.” On June 10, 2003, the Company changed its name from “Yseek, Inc.” to “Advanced 3-D Ultrasound Services, Inc.” The Company merged with a private Florida corporation known as World Energy Solutions, Inc. effective August 17, 2005. Advanced 3D Ultrasound Services, Inc. (“A3D”) remained as the surviving entity as the legal acquirer, and the Company was the accounting acquirer. On November 7, 2005, the Company changed its name to World Energy Solutions, Inc. (“WESI”). On November 7, 2005, WESI merged with Professional Technical Systems, Inc. (“PTS”). WESI remained as the surviving entity as the legal acquirer, while PTS was the accounting acquirer. On February 26, 2009, the Company changed its name to EClips Energy Technologies, Inc. On March 16, 2010, the Company filed the Definitive Schedule 14C with the SEC notifying its stockholders that on March 2, 2010, a majority of the voting capital stock of the Company took action in lieu of a special meeting of stockholders authorizing the Company to enter into the Merger Agreement with its newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, EClips Media, for the purpose of changing the state of incorporation of the Company to Delaware from Florida. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company merged with and into EClips Media with EClips Media continuing as the surviving corporation on April 21, 2010.On May 17, 2010, the Company changed its name from "Eclips Energy Technologies, Inc." to , "Eclips Media Technologies, Inc."

On December 22, 2009, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement (the “Croxton Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, Benjamin C. Croxton (the “Seller”), and certain purchasers of securities owned by the Seller, representing a controlling interest in the Company (each a “ Purchaser ” and collectively the "Purchasers"). The Croxton Purchase Agreement was subsequently amended on January 12, 2010. As amended the Croxton Purchase Agreement contemplates a change of control of the Company through the resignation of the existing officers and directors, and the purchase, in privately negotiated transactions, of outstanding shares of the Company from the Seller, and the appointment of Greg Cohen as director and Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the Croxton Purchase Agreement, Purchasers agreed to purchase from the Seller an aggregate of (i) 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value (“Common Stock”) and (ii) 1,500,000 shares of Series D preferred stock (the “Series D Preferred Stock” and collectively with the Common Stock, the “Shares”), comprising approximately 82% of the issued and outstanding shares of voting stock of the Company. The closing of the purchase of the Shares occurred on February 4, 2010.

In June 2010, the Croxton Stock Purchase Agreement has been restructured and the undocumented advance made on behalf of the various contemplated purchasers has been modified into a direct purchase by one individual (the “Buyer”) of all of the 50,000,000 shares sold by Mr. Croxton pursuant to the Croxton Stock Purchase Agreement (100,000,000 shares of common stock following the 2:1 forward exchange effected May 17, 2010) which is anticipated to be followed by offers made to various private purchases (the “Private Purchases”) by various other persons in an amount to be agreed, and at a purchase price to be agreed, with such seller.

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company entered into a secured 6% demand promissory note (the “Demand Note”)with RootZoo, Inc. (“RZ”). RZ owned and operated a website www.rootzoo.com, focused upon providing social networking to sports fans, statistics and commentary to the sports community. During the fourth quarter of 2009 the Company had entered into negotiations with the then fifty (50%) percent owner of the common stock of RZ and one of its then two directors (the “RZ Part Owner”) to acquire RZ pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “RZ Acquisition”), but negotiations for the RZ Acquisition broke down and have since been terminated. As a result of the discontinuance of all negotiations for the RZ Acquisition, the Company elected to foreclose on its loan and to acquire the RZ business under its foreclosed loan agreement. On May 15, 2010 the Company demanded repayment of all outstanding amounts under the Demand Note. On June 6, 2010, RZ entered into a Peaceful Possession Letter Agreement with the Company pursuant to which RZ granted the Company all rights of possession in and to the collateral which secures the Demand Note, representing substantially all of the assets of RZ in partial satisfaction with the Demand Note debt. Subsequently the Company, through an Assignment Agreement, assigned the rights and possession of the collateral to its subsidiary, RZ Acquisition Corp. Following termination of negotiations, all of the persons associated with the development of the RZ business resigned. RZ presently has no employees or others who perform services necessary to maintain and develop RZ business successfully. Due to the termination of negotiations, the Company believes that the assets of RZ has no value and worthless. Consequently, the Company recorded a total impairment loss of $173,257 which represents the principal amount of $171,100 and interest receivable of $2,157 in connection with the secured 6% demand promissory note agreement.

On June 21, 2010, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SD and Brand Interaction Group, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability (“BIG”) pursuant to which, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary SD, acquired all of the business and assets and assumed certain liabilities of BIG owned by Eric Simon our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). BIG owned Fantasy Football SUPERDRAFTTM, a sports entertainment and media business focused on promotion of fantasy league events through live events hosted in various venues such as Las Vegas, and online, which feature sports and media personalities, and the sale and marketing of various sports oriented products and services.

In September 2010, we decided to discontinue the operations of SD acquisition Corp. because of the disappointing performance and negative results of its most recent fantasy league event in August 2010. Accordingly, SD acquisition Corp. is recorded as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company has agreed in principal to enter into a spin off agreement (the “Spinoff”) with BIG and Mr. Eric Simon, the Company’s former CEO, pursuant to which the Company will return the Superdraft business to Mr. Simon by exchanging 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of SD Acquisition Corp., which owned and operated the Superdraft business, for the cancellation of 30,000,000 shares of the Company owned by Mr. Simon and BIG, the cancellation of the Asset Purchase Agreement and Employment Agreement entered into between the Company, Mr. Simon and BIG in June 2010. In addition, BIG will make certain payments to some of our noteholders which would reduce, on a dollar for dollar basis, amounts due and payable by us to such noteholders. The Spinoff remains subject to revision.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we had a net loss of $ 6,968,251 and $679,154 of net cash used in operations. At September 30, 2010 we had a working capital deficiency of $2,556,768. Additionally at September 30, 2010, we had an accumulated deficit of $3,448,661. These matters and the Company’s expected needs for capital investments required to support operational growth raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s unaudited financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible effects on recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from our inability to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management's applications of accounting policies. Critical accounting policies for our company include revenue recognition and accounting for stock based compensation.

Stock based Compensation

Use of Estimates

Property and Equipment

Valuation of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Pursuant to ASC Topic 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Asset and ASC 360-10-35-15, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, we assess the impairment of identifiable intangibles, long-lived assets and goodwill annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. Factors we consider include and are not limited to the following:

·	Significant changes in performance relative to expected operating results

·	Significant changes in the use of the assets or the strategy of our overall business

·	Significant industry or economic trends

As determined in accordance with ASC Topic 350, if the carrying amount of goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the assets. In accordance with ASC 360-10-35-15, in determining if impairment exists, we estimate the undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the use and ultimate disposition of these assets. The impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair market value of the assets.

Derivative Liabilities

In June 2008, a FASB approved guidance related to the determination of whether a freestanding equity-linked instrument should be classified as equity or debt under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic No. 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in an Entity’s Own Stock . The adoption of this requirement will affect accounting for convertible instruments and warrants with provisions that protect holders from declines in the stock price ("down-round" provisions). Warrants with such provisions will no longer be recorded in equity and would have to be reclassified to a liability. Instruments with down-round protection are not considered indexed to a company's own stock under ASC Topic 815, because neither the occurrence of a sale of common stock by the company at market nor the issuance of another equity-linked instrument with a lower strike price is an input to the fair value of a fixed-for-fixed option on equity shares. ASC Topic 815 guidance is to be applied to outstanding instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the Issue is applied. The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle shall be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity) for that fiscal year, presented separately. If an instrument is classified as debt, it is valued at fair value, and this value is re-measured on an ongoing basis, with changes recorded on the statement of operations in each reporting period.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as prescribed by ASC Topic 740: Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). It requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. The charge for taxation is based on the results for the year as adjusted for items, which are non-assessable or disallowed. It is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.

Deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method in respect of temporary differences arising from differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax basis used in the computation of assessable tax profit. In principle, deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences, and deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probably that taxable profit will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilized.

Deferred tax is calculated using tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it is related to items credited or charged directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and we intend to settle our current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

Pursuant to accounting standards related to the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The adoption had no effect on our financial statements.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Results of Operations

Three and Nine months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Three and Nine months Ended September 30, 2009

Net revenues

We have not generated revenues during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Operating Expenses

Costs associated with the administration of the Company were included in continued operations and in relation to the public entity. Payroll and stock based compensation expenses were $969,167 and $756,311 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of approximately of $212,856 or 28%. The increase was primarily attributable to the issuance of our common stock to our Chairman pursuant to a consulting agreement in February 2010. In addition, Pursuant to an Employment Agreement dated on June 21, 2010 we issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to our former Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Eric Simon, valued at $0.04 per share or $400,000. Payroll and stock based compensation expenses were $101,875 and $93,882 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of approximately of $7,993 or 9%.

Professional and consulting expenses were $2,808,623 and $203,642 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of approximately of $2,604,981 or 1,279%. Professional expenses were incurred for the audits and public filing requirements. The increase was primarily attributable to the issuance of our common stock to four consultants for services rendered amounting to $2,610,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Professional and consulting expenses were $74,912 and $72,014 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of approximately of $2,898 or 4%.

General and administrative expenses, which consist of office expenses, insurance, rent and general operating expenses totaled $278,137 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to $185,900 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of approximately $92,237 or 50%. The increase is primarily attributable to the impairment loss of $173,258 in connection with the issuance of a secured 6% demand promissory note to RootZoo Inc. (“RZ”), an entity the Company contemplated acquiring but negotiations broke down and have since been terminated. As a result of the discontinuance of all negotiations for RZ, the Company elected to foreclose on its loan and to acquire the RZ business under its foreclosed loan agreement. On May 15, 2010 the Company demanded repayment of all outstanding amounts under the Demand Note. On June 6, 2010, RZ entered into a Peaceful Possession Letter Agreement with the Company pursuant to which RZ granted the Company all rights of possession in and to the collateral which secures the Demand Note, representing substantially all of the assets of RZ in partial satisfaction with the Demand Note debt. Subsequently the Company, through an Assignment Agreement, assigned the rights and possession of the collateral to its subsidiary, RZ Acquisition Corp. Due to the termination of this negotiation, we believe RZ is financially unable to satisfy its obligations to us and the foreclosed assets of RZ has no value and are worthless. Such increase was offset by decrease in rent expense of $42,232 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. General and administrative expenses, which consist of office expenses, insurance, rent and general operating expenses totaled $37,468 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to $68,607 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of approximately $31,139 or 45%. This is due to decrease in rent and general operating expense as a result of decrease in operations.

Total Other Expense

Our total other expenses in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily include expenses associated with derivative liabilities and interest expense.

CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES AND DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES EXPENSE

We recorded derivative liability expense of $3,260,076 in connection with the issuance of the convertible debentures with warrants for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Change in fair value of derivative liabilities expense consist of income or expense associated with the change in the fair value of derivative liabilities as a result of the application of FASB ASC Topic No. 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in an Entity’s Own Stock , to our financial statements. The variation in fair value of the derivative liabilities between measurement dates amounted to an (increase) decrease of $(366,480) and $2,032,567 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The increase/decrease in fair value of the derivative liabilities has been recognized as other expense/income. We did not have a comparable other expense during the same period in 2009 for we have issued convertible debentures beginning in December 2009.

The adoption of ASC Topic No. 815-40’s requirements will affect accounting for convertible instruments and warrants with provisions that protect holders from declines in the stock price (“down-round” provisions). Warrants with such provisions will no longer be recorded in equity. Instruments with down-round protection are not considered indexed to a company’s own stock under ASC Topic No. 815-40, because neither the occurrence of a sale of common stock by the company at market nor the issuance of another equity-linked instrument with a lower strike price is an input to the fair value of a fixed-for-fixed option on equity shares. In connection with the issuance of the 6% Senior Convertible Debentures beginning on December 17, 2009, the Company has determined that the terms of the convertible debenture include a down-round provision under which the conversion price could be affected by future equity offerings undertaken by the Company until the 18 month anniversary of such convertible debenture.

So long as convertible instruments and warrants with down-round provisions that protect holders from declines in the stock price remain outstanding we will recognize other income or expense in future periods based upon the fluctuation of the market price of our common stock. This non-cash income or expense is reasonably anticipated to materially affect our net loss in future periods. We are, however, unable to estimate the amount of such income/expense in future periods as the income/expense is partly based on the market price of our common stock at the end of a future measurement date. In addition, in the future if we issue securities which are classified as derivatives we will incur expense and income items in future periods. Investors are cautioned to consider the impact of this non-cash accounting treatment on our financial statements.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense consists primarily of interest recognized in connection with the amortization of debt discount, amortization of debt issuance cost and interest on our convertible debentures. The increase in interest expense when compared to the same period in 2009 is primarily attributable to the amortization of the debt discount amounting to approximately $128,125 and $226,667 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, associated with the 6% convertible debenture.

Discontinued Operations

The Company’s operations were developing and manufacturing products and services, which reduce fuel costs, save power & energy and protect the environment. The products and services were made available for sale into markets in the public and private sectors. In December 2009, we discontinued these operations and disposed of certain of its subsidiaries, and prior periods have been restated in our financial statements and related footnotes to conform to this presentation. Additionally, in September 2010, we decided to discontinue the operations of SD acquisition Corp. because of the disappointing performance and negative results of its most recent fantasy league event in August 2010.

The following table sets forth for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, indicated selected financial data of the Company's discontinued operations.

	September 30, 2010			September 30, 2009
Revenues	$	178,645		$	61,266
Cost of sales		381,331			27,509
Gross (loss) profit		(202,686	)		33,757
Operating and other non-operating expenses		1,218,378			51,444

Loss from discontinued operations	$	(1,421,064	)	$	(17,687	)

The following table sets forth for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, indicated selected financial data of the Company's discontinued operations.

	September 30, 2010			September 30, 2009
Revenues	$	178,645		$	260,992
Cost of sales		381,331			189,450
Gross (loss) profit		(202,686	)		71,542
Operating and other non-operating expenses		1,225,312			183,870

Loss from discontinued operations	$	(1,427,998	)	$	(112,328	)

Loss from continuing operations

We recorded loss from continuing operations of $726,021 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $235,030 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. We recorded loss from continuing operations of $5,540,253 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $1,148,880 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Net Loss

We recorded net loss of $2,147,085 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $252,717 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. We recorded net loss of $6,968,251 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $1,261,208 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations, and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. At September 30, 2010, we had a cash balance of $19,827. Our working capital deficit is $2,556,768 at September 30, 2010. We reported a net loss of $6,968,251 and $1,261,208 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We do not anticipate we will be profitable in fiscal 2010.

We reported a net increase in cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $19,827. While we currently have no material commitments for capital expenditures, at September 30, 2010 we owed $1,025,000 under various convertible debentures. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we have raised net proceeds of $937,500 from convertible debentures and $75,000 from the sale of our common stock. We do not presently have any external sources of working capital.

We do not have revenues to fund our operating expenses. We presently do not have any available credit, bank financing or other external sources of liquidity. We will need to obtain additional capital in order to expand operations and become profitable. In order to obtain capital, we may need to sell additional shares of our common stock or borrow funds from private lenders. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining additional funding. Additional capital is being sought, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain such investments. Financing transactions may include the issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities, or other financing mechanisms. However, the trading price of our common stock and a downturn in the U.S. equity and debt markets could make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Furthermore, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations.

Operating activities

Net cash flows used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 amounted to $679,154 and was primarily attributable to our net losses of $6,968,251, offset by amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs of $230,835, stock based expenses of $3,529,167, derivative liability expense of $3,260,076, change in fair value of derivative liabilities of ($2,032,567), contributed services of $10,000, depreciation of $3,254, impairment loss of $173,257, discontinued operating activities such as impairment loss of $1,043,038, and total changes in assets and liabilities from continued and discontinued activities of $58,696. Net cash flows used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 amounted to $325,646 and was primarily attributable to our net losses of $1,261,208, offset by stock based expenses of $656,962, discontinued operating activities such as depreciation of $129,227, and total changes in assets and liabilities of $149,373.

Investing activities

Net cash flows used in investing activities was $313,519 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. We paid leasehold improvement of $14,025, purchase of equipment of $23,451, cash used in acquisition (net of cash acquired) of $104,943 and invested $171,100 on a 6% demand promissory note receivable. Net cash flows used in investing activities was $787 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Financing activities

Net cash flows provided by financing activities was $1,012,500 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. We received net proceeds from convertible debentures of $950,000 offset by debt issuance cost of $12,500 and the sale of our common stock of $75,000. Net cash flows provided by financing activities was $344,899 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We received net proceeds from sale of our stock of $344,899.

Debenture Financing

Between December 2009 and June 2010, the Company entered into various securities purchase agreement with accredited investors pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of $1,025,000 of its 6% Convertible Debentures for an aggregate purchase price of $1,025,000. The Debentures bear interest at 6% per annum and matures twenty-four months from the date of issuance. The Debentures are convertible at the option of the holder at any time into shares of common stock, at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.025 per share or (ii) until the eighteen (18) months anniversary of the Debenture, the lowest price paid per share or the lowest conversion price per share in a subsequent sale of the Company’s equity and/or convertible debt securities paid by investors after the date of the Debenture. In connection with the Agreements, the Investors received an aggregate of 41,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The Warrants are exercisable for a period of five years from the date of issuance at an exercise price of $0.025, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The Investor may exercise the Warrant on a cashless basis if the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Warrant) of one share of common stock is greater than the Initial Exercise Price.

Contractual Obligations

We have certain fixed contractual obligations and commitments that include future estimated payments. Changes in our business needs, cancellation provisions, changing interest rates, and other factors may result in actual payments differing from the estimates. We cannot provide certainty regarding the timing and amounts of payments. We have presented below a summary of the most significant assumptions used in our determination of amounts presented in the tables, in order to assist in the review of this information within the context of our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

The following tables summarize our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2010, and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.

	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		5 Years +
Contractual Obligations :
Long term loans	$	—		—		1,025,000		—	—
Total Contractual Obligations:	$	—		—		1,025,000		—	—

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any other financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as stockholder’s equity or that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

With respect to the quarterly period ending September 30, 2010, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluation, the Company’s management has concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2010 due to the Company’s limited internal resources and lack of ability to have multiple levels of transaction review.

Management is in the process of determining how best to change our current system and implement a more effective system to insure that information required to be disclosed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately. Our management acknowledges the existence of this problem, and intends to developed procedures to address them to the extent possible given limitations in financial and manpower resources. While management is working on a plan, no assurance can be made at this point that the implementation of such controls and procedures will be completed in a timely manner or that they will be adequate once implemented.

Changes in Internal Controls.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

None.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED).

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

* Filed herein

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	ECLIPS MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Date: November 15, 2010	By:	/s/ Glenn Kesner
		Glenn Kesner
		Chief Executive Officer
		(principal executive officer and principal accounting officer)