NICHOLAS FINANCIAL INC - Annual Report: 2022 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
Commission File Number 0-26680
NICHOLAS FINANCIAL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
British Columbia, Canada |
59-2506879 |
( State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2454 McMullen Booth Road, Building C Clearwater, FL |
33759 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (727) 726-0763
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
|
Trading Symbol(s) |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common shares, no par value |
|
NICK |
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
☐ |
|
Accelerated filer |
☐ |
Non-accelerated filer |
☒ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
☒ |
Emerging growth company |
☐ |
|
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing price of the shares of common stock on The NASDAQ Stock Market on September 30, 2021, was approximately $93.2 million.
The number of shares of Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2022 was approximately 12.7 million shares, no par value (of which approximately 5.1 million shares were held by the Registrant’s principal operating subsidiary and pursuant to applicable law, not entitled to vote and approximately 7.6 million shares were entitled to vote).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement and Information Circular for the 2022 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10 through 14, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
NICHOLAS FINANCIAL, INC.
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page No. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Item 1A. |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Item 1B. |
|
|
24 |
|
|
Item 2. |
|
|
24 |
|
|
Item 3. |
|
|
24 |
|
|
Item 4. |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
|
25 |
|
|
Item 6. |
|
|
26 |
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
27 |
|
Item 7A. |
|
|
34 |
|
|
Item 8. |
|
|
35 |
|
|
Item 9A. |
|
|
60 |
|
|
Item 9B. |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 10. |
|
|
61 |
|
|
Item 11. |
|
|
61 |
|
|
Item 12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
61 |
|
Item 13. |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
|
61 |
|
Item 14. |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 15. |
|
|
63 |
Forward-Looking Information
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report” or “Annual Report”) contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements are based on management’s current beliefs and assumptions, as well as information currently available to management. When used in this document, the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “will,” “may,” “plan,” “believe,” “intend” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although Nicholas Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) believes that the expectations reflected or implied in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. As a result, actual results could differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report may include, without limitation: (1) the projected impact of the novel coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) outbreak on our customers and our business, (2) projections of revenue, income, and other items relating to our financial position and results of operations, (3) statements of our capital allocation plans, particularly alternatives for future use of excess equity capital, (4) statements of other plans, objectives, strategies, goals and intentions, (5) statements regarding the capabilities, capacities, market position and expected development of our business operations, and (6) statements of expected industry and general economic trends. These statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may cause results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements, including without limitation:
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or expected. All forward-looking statements included in this Report are based on information available to the Company as the date of filing of this Annual Report, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statement. Prospective investors should also consult the risk factors described from time to time in the Company’s other filings made with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including its reports on Forms 10-Q, 8-K and annual reports to shareholders.
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
Nicholas Financial, Inc. (“Nicholas Financial-Canada”) is a Canadian holding company incorporated under the laws of British Columbia in 1986. The business activities of Nicholas Financial-Canada are currently conducted exclusively through its wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, Nicholas Financial, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Nicholas Financial”). Nicholas Financial is a specialized consumer finance company engaged primarily in acquiring and servicing automobile finance installment contracts (“Contracts”) for purchases of used and new automobiles and light trucks. Additionally, Nicholas Financial originates direct consumer loans (“Direct Loans”) and sells consumer-finance related products. A second Florida subsidiary, Nicholas Data Services, Inc. (“NDS”), serves as the intermediate holding company for Nicholas Financial. In addition, NF Funding I, LLC (“NF Funding I”), is a wholly-owned, special purpose financing subsidiary of Nicholas Financial.
Nicholas Financial-Canada, Nicholas Financial, NDS, and NF Funding I are hereafter collectively referred to as the “Company”.
All financial information herein is designated in United States dollars. References to “fiscal 2022” are to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 and references to “fiscal 2021” are to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021.
The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 2454 McMullen Booth Road, Building C, Clearwater, Florida 33759, and its telephone number is (727) 726-0763.
Available Information
The Company’s filings with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, definitive proxy statements on Schedule 14A, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed pursuant to Sections 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are made available free of charge through the Investor Center section of the Company’s Internet website at http://www.nicholasfinancial.com as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. The Company is not including the information contained on or available through its website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Report. Copies of any materials the Company files with the SEC can also be obtained free of charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Operating Strategy
The Company remains committed to its branch-based model and its core product of financing primary transportation to and from work for the subprime borrower through the local independent automobile dealership. The Company strategically employs the use of centralized servicing departments to supplement the branch operations and improve operational efficiencies, but its focus is on its core business model of decentralized operations. The Company’s strategy also includes risk-based pricing (rate, yield, advance, term, collateral value) and a commitment to the underwriting discipline required for optimal portfolio performance. The Company’s principal goals are to increase its profitability and its long-term shareholder value. During fiscal 2022, the Company focused on the following items:
1
The Company also focused on selecting the right markets to have branch locations. As of March 31, 2022, the Company operated brick and mortar branch locations in 18 states — Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin. The Company also originated business in its expansion state of Arizona without a physical branch in such markets.
In fiscal 2022, the Company did not initiate any new restructuring activities.
In fiscal 2022, the Company expanded the branch network with the opening of branches in Boise, Idaho and Houston, Texas. The Company also expanded through the Virtual Servicing Center in Augusta, Georgia, Northern Indiana, and Greenville, North Carolina. Although the Company cannot assert how many new markets it will enter (if any) in the foreseeable future, it does remain focused on growing the branch network where conditions are favorable.
During fiscal 2022, the Company completed bulk portfolio purchases for a total of $3.1 million, with $1.2 million in the first quarter, $0.6 million in the second quarter, $1.1 million in the third quarter, and $0.2 million in the fourth quarter, respectively. The Company plans to consider more bulk portfolio purchases when favorable opportunities present themselves.
During fiscal 2021, the Company completed bulk portfolio purchases for a total of $1.4 million, with $0.3 million in the first quarter, $0.7 million in the third quarter, and $0.4 million in the fourth quarter, respectively.
The Company is currently licensed to provide Direct Loans in 14 states — Alabama, Florida, Georgia (over $3,000), Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The Company solicits current and former customers in these states for the purpose of providing Direct Loans to such customers, and intends to continue the expansion of its Direct Loan capabilities to the other states in which it acquires Contracts. Even with this targeted expansion, the Company expects its total Direct Loans portfolio to remain between 10% and 15% of its total portfolio for the foreseeable future.
The Company cannot provide any assurances that it will be able to expand in either its current markets or any targeted new markets.
Automobile Finance Business – Contracts
The Company is engaged in the business of providing financing programs, primarily to purchasers of used cars and light trucks who meet the Company’s credit standards but who do not meet the credit standards of traditional lenders, such as banks and credit unions, because of the customer’s credit history, job instability, the age of the vehicle being financed, or some other factor(s). Unlike lenders that look primarily to the credit history of the borrower in making lending decisions, typically financing new automobiles, the Company is willing to purchase Contracts for purchases made by borrowers who do not have a good credit history and for older model and high-mileage automobiles. In making decisions regarding the purchase of a particular Contract, the Company considers the following factors related to the borrower: current income; credit history; history in making installment payments for automobiles; current and prior job status; and place and length of residence. In addition, the Company examines its prior experience with Contracts purchased from the dealer from which the Company is purchasing the Contract, and the value of the automobile in relation to the purchase price and the term of the Contract.
As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company’s automobile finance programs are conducted in 18 states through a total of 47 branch offices located in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin. (Arizona is an expansion state with no local branch office). The Company acquires Contracts in these states through its virtual expansion office operations based in the Charlotte, North Carolina Corporate
2
location. As of March 31, 2022, the Company had non-exclusive agreements with approximately 13,000 dealers, of which approximately 9,000 were active, for the purchase of individual Contracts that meet the Company’s financing criteria. The Company considers a dealer agreement to be active if the contract is complete and executed. Each dealer agreement requires the dealer to originate Contracts in accordance with the Company’s guidelines. Once a Contract is purchased by the Company, the dealer is no longer involved in the relationship between the Company and the borrower, other than through the existence of limited representations and warranties of the dealer in favor of the Company.
A customer under a Contract typically makes a down payment, in the form of cash and/or trade-in, ranging from 5% to 35% of the sale price of the vehicle financed. The balance of the purchase price of the vehicle plus taxes, title fees and, if applicable, premiums for extended service contracts, GAP waiver coverage, roadside assistance plans, credit disability insurance and/or credit life insurance are generally financed over a period of 12 to 60 months. At approximately the time of origination, the Company purchases a Contract from an automobile dealer at a negotiated price that is less than the original principal amount being financed by the purchaser of the automobile. The Company refers to the difference between the negotiated price and the original principal amount being financed as the dealer discount. The amount of the dealer discount depends upon factors such as the age and value of the automobile and the creditworthiness of the customer. The Company has recommitted to maintaining pricing discipline and therefore places less emphasis on competition when pricing the discount. Generally, the Company will pay more (i.e., purchase the Contract at a smaller discount from the original principal amount) for Contracts as the credit risk of the customer improves. To date, the Contracts purchased by the Company have been purchased at discounts that range from 1% to 15% of the original principal amount of each Contract, with the typical average discount being between 6.00% and 8.00%. As of March 31, 2022, the Company’s indirect loan portfolio consisted of Contracts purchased from a dealer or acquired through a bulk acquisition. Such Contracts are purchased without recourse to the dealer, however each dealer remains potentially liable to the Company for breaches of certain representations and warranties made by the dealer with respect to compliance with applicable federal and state laws and valid title to the vehicle. The Company’s policy is to only purchase a Contract after the dealer has provided the Company with the requisite proof that (a) the Company has a first priority lien on the financed vehicle (or the Company has, in fact, perfected such first priority lien), (b) the customer has obtained the required collision insurance naming the Company as loss payee with a deductible of not more than $1,000 and (c) the Contract has been fully and accurately completed and validly executed. Once the Company has received and approved all required documents, it pays the dealer for the Contract and commences servicing the Contract.
3
Contract Procurement
The Company purchased Contracts in the states listed in the table below during the periods indicated. The Contracts purchased by the Company are predominantly for used vehicles; for the periods shown below, less than 1% were for new vehicles. The average model year collateralizing the portfolio as of March 31, 2022 was a 2012 vehicle. The dollar amounts shown in the table below represent the Company’s finance receivables on Contracts purchased within the respective fiscal year:
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Number of Branches on |
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, (In thousands) |
|
|||||||
State |
|
rate (1) |
|
|
March 31, 2022 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||||
Alabama |
|
18-36%(2) |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
4,121 |
|
|
$ |
2,534 |
|
|
Arizona |
|
(2) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Florida |
|
18-30%(3) |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13,886 |
|
|
|
16,268 |
|
|
Georgia |
|
18-30%(3) |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11,007 |
|
|
|
11,129 |
|
|
Idaho |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
Illinois |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
Indiana |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4,878 |
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
Kansas |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Kentucky |
|
18-25%(3) |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
4,890 |
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
Missouri |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5,459 |
|
|
|
4,759 |
|
Nevada |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
North Carolina |
|
18-29%(3) |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6,997 |
|
|
|
4,586 |
|
|
Ohio |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12,495 |
|
|
|
11,636 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
18-21%(3) |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
South Carolina |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5,432 |
|
|
|
4,545 |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
Texas |
|
18-23%(3) |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
Utah |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Wisconsin |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
$ |
85,804 |
|
|
$ |
74,025 |
|
The following table presents selected information on Contracts purchased by the Company:
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|||||
Contracts |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Purchases |
|
$ |
85,804 |
|
|
$ |
74,025 |
|
Average APR |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
Average dealer discount |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
Average term (months) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Average loan |
|
$ |
11,002 |
|
|
$ |
10,135 |
|
Number of Contracts purchased |
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
|
7,307 |
|
4
Direct Loans
The Company currently originates Direct Loans in Alabama, Florida, Georgia (over $3,000), Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Tennessee. Direct Loans are loans originated directly between the Company and the consumer. These loans are typically for amounts ranging from $500 to $11,000 and are generally secured by a lien on an automobile, watercraft or other permissible tangible personal property. The average loan made during fiscal 2022 by the Company had an initial principal balance of approximately $4,300. The Company does not expect the average loan size to increase significantly within the foreseeable future. Most of the Direct Loans are originated with current or former customers under the Company’s automobile financing program. The typical Direct Loan represents a better credit risk than our typical Contract due to the customer’s payment history with the Company, as well as their established relationship with the local branch staff. The Company does not have a Direct Loan license in Idaho, Nevada, Texas, Utah, or Wisconsin, and none is presently required in Georgia provided that the original principal balance of the loan is greater than $3,000. The size of the loan and maximum interest rate that may be (and is) charged varies from state to state. The Company considers the individual’s income, credit history, job stability, and the value of the collateral offered by the borrower to secure the loan as the primary factors in determining whether an applicant will receive an approval for such loan. Additionally, because most of the Direct Loans made by the Company to date have been made to borrowers under Contracts previously purchased by the Company, the collection experience of the borrower under the Contract is a significant factor in making the underwriting decision. The Company’s Direct Loan program was implemented in April 1995 and accounted for approximately 12% of the Company’s annual consolidated revenues during the year ended March 31, 2022.
In connection with its Direct Loan program, the Company also makes available credit disability insurance, credit life insurance, and involuntary unemployment insurance coverage to customers through unaffiliated third-party insurance carriers. Approximately 69% of the Direct Loans outstanding as of March 31, 2022 elected to purchase third-party insurance coverage made available by the Company. The cost of this insurance to the customer, which includes a commission for the Company, is included in the amount financed by the customer.
The following table presents selected information on Direct Loans originated by the Company:
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
|||||
Direct Loans |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Originations |
|
$ |
28,740 |
|
|
$ |
14,148 |
|
Average APR |
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
29.6 |
% |
Average term (months) |
|
26 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Average loan |
|
$ |
4,307 |
|
|
$ |
4,131 |
|
Number of contracts originated |
|
|
6,770 |
|
|
|
3,497 |
|
Underwriting Guidelines
The Company’s typical customer has a credit history that fails to meet the lending standards of most banks and credit unions. Some of the credit problems experienced by the Company’s customers that resulted in a poor credit history include but are not limited to: prior automobile account repossessions, unpaid revolving credit card obligations, unpaid medical bills, unpaid student loans, prior bankruptcy, and evictions for nonpayment of rent. The Company believes that its customer profile is similar to that of its direct competitors.
The Company’s process to approve the purchase of a Contract begins with the Company receiving a standardized credit application completed by the consumer which contains information relating to the consumer’s background, employment, and credit history. The Company also obtains credit reports from Equifax and/or TransUnion, which are independent credit reporting services. The Company verifies the consumer’s employment history, income, and residence. In most cases, consumers are interviewed via telephone by a Company application processor (usually the Branch Manager or Assistant Branch Manager). The Company also considers the customer’s prior payment history with the Company, if any, as well as the collateral value of the vehicle being financed.
The Company has established internal underwriting guidelines to be used by its Branch Managers and Internal underwriters when purchasing Contracts. Any Contract that does not meet these guidelines must be approved by the District Managers or senior management of the Company. The Company currently has District Managers charged
5
with managing the specific branches in a defined geographic area. In addition to a variety of administrative duties, the District Managers are responsible for monitoring their assigned branches’ compliance with the Company’s underwriting guidelines as well as approving underwriting exceptions.
The Company uses similar criteria in analyzing a Direct Loan as it does in analyzing the purchase of a Contract. Lending decisions regarding Direct Loans are made based upon a review of the customer’s loan application, income, credit history, job stability, and the value of the collateral offered by the borrower to secure the loan. To date, since the majority of the Company’s Direct Loans have been made to individuals whose automobiles have been financed by the Company, the customer’s payment history under his or her existing or past Contract is a significant factor in the lending decision.
After reviewing the information included in the Contract or Direct Loan application and taking the other factors into account, the Company’s loan origination system categorizes the customer using internally developed credit classifications from “1,” indicating higher creditworthiness, through “4,” indicating lower creditworthiness. Contracts are financed for individuals who fall within all four acceptable rating categories utilized, “1” through “4”. Usually a customer who falls within the two highest categories (i.e., “1” or “2”) is purchasing a two to five-year old, lower mileage used automobile, while a customer in any of the two lowest categories (i.e., “3,” or “4”) usually is purchasing an older, higher mileage automobile from an independent used automobile dealer.
The Company performs audits of its branches’ compliance with Company underwriting guidelines. The Company audits branches on a schedule that is variable depending on the size of the branch, length of time a branch has been open, current tenure of the Branch Manager, previous branch audit score, and current and historical branch profitability. Additionally, field supervisions and audits are conducted by District Managers, Divisional Vice Presidents and Divisional Administrative Assistants to ensure operational and underwriting compliance throughout the branch network.
Monitoring and Enforcement of Contracts
The Company requires each customer under a Contract to obtain and maintain collision insurance covering damage to the vehicle. Failure to maintain such insurance constitutes a default under the Contract, and the Company may, at its discretion, repossess the vehicle. To reduce potential loss due to insurance lapse, the Company has the contractual right to obtain collateral protection insurance through a third-party, which covers loss due to physical damage to a vehicle not covered by any insurance policy of the customer.
The Company’s Management Information Services personnel maintain a number of reports to monitor compliance by customers with their obligations under Contracts and Direct Loans made by the Company. These reports may be accessed on a real-time basis or at the end of the day throughout the Company by management personnel, including Branch Managers and staff, at computer terminals located in the main office and each branch office. These reports include delinquency reports, customer promise reports, vehicle information reports, purchase reports, dealer analysis reports, static pool reports, and repossession reports.
A delinquency report is an aging report that provides basic information regarding each customer account and indicates accounts that are past due. The report includes information such as the account number, address of the customer, phone numbers of the customer, original term of the Contract, number of remaining payments, outstanding balance, due dates, date of last payment, number of days past due, scheduled payment amount, amount of last payment, total past due, and special payment arrangements or agreements.
When an account becomes delinquent, the Company immediately contacts the customer to determine the reason for the delinquency and to determine if appropriate arrangements for payment can be made. If payment arrangements acceptable to the Company can be made, the information is entered in its database and is used to generate a customer promises report, which is utilized by the Company’s collection staff for account follow up.
The Company prepares a repossession report that provides information regarding repossessed vehicles and aids the Company in disposing of repossessed vehicles. In addition to information regarding the customer, this report provides information regarding the date of repossession, date the vehicle was sold, number of days it was held in inventory prior to sale, year, make and model of the vehicle, mileage, payoff amount on the Contract, NADA book value, Black Book value, suggested sale price, location of the vehicle, original dealer and condition of the vehicle, as well as notes other information that may be helpful to the Company.
6
If an account is 121 days delinquent and the related vehicle has not yet been repossessed, the account is charged-off and transferred to the Loss Prevention and Recovery Department. Once a vehicle has been repossessed, the related loan balance no longer appears on the delinquency report. Instead, the vehicle appears on the Company’s repossession report and is generally sold at auction.
The Company also prepares a dealer analysis report that provides information regarding each dealer from which it purchases Contracts. This report allows the Company to analyze the volume of business done with each dealer, the terms on which it has purchased Contracts from such dealer, as well as the overall portfolio performance of Contracts purchased from the dealer.
The Company is subject to seasonal variations within the subprime marketplace. While the APR, discount, and term remain consistent across quarters, write offs and delinquencies tend to be lower while purchases tend to be higher in the fourth and first quarter of the fiscal year. The second and third quarter of the fiscal year tend to have higher write offs and delinquencies, and a lower level of purchases.
Marketing and Advertising
The Company’s Contract marketing efforts currently are directed primarily toward automobile dealers. The Company attempts to meet dealers’ needs by offering highly responsive, cost-competitive, and service-oriented financing programs. The Company relies on its District and Branch Managers to solicit agreements for the purchase of Contracts with automobile dealers located within a 60-mile radius of each branch office. The Branch Manager provides dealers with information regarding the Company and the general terms upon which the Company is willing to purchase Contracts. The Company uses web advertising, social media and print ads in dealer association publications for marketing purposes. The Company is a member and corporate sponsor of the National Independent Auto Dealers Association, which also gives it access to state-level associations. Its representatives attend conferences and events for both state and national associations to market its products directly to dealers in attendance.
The Company solicits customers under its Direct Loan program primarily through direct mailings, followed by telephone calls to individuals who have a good credit history with the Company in connection with Contracts purchased by the Company. It also relies on other forms of electronic messaging and in-store advertising.
Computerized Information System
All Company personnel are provided with real-time access to information. The Company has purchased specialized programs to automate the tracking of Contracts and Direct Loans from inception. The Company’s computer network encompasses both its corporate headquarters and its branch office locations. See “Monitoring and Enforcement of Contracts” above for a summary of the different reports prepared by the Company.
Competition
The consumer finance industry is highly fragmented and highly competitive. Due to various factors, the competitiveness of the industry continues to increase as new competitors continue to enter the market and certain existing competitors continue to expand their operations. There are numerous financial service companies that provide consumer credit in the markets served by the Company, including banks, credit unions, other consumer finance companies, and captive finance companies owned by automobile manufacturers and retailers. Increased competition for the purchase of Contracts enables automobile dealers to shop for the best price, which can result in an erosion in the dealer discounts from the initial principal amounts at which the Company is willing to purchase Contracts and higher advance rates. However, the Company instead focuses on purchasing Contracts that are priced to reflect the inherent risk level of the Contract, and sacrifices loan volume, if necessary, to maintain that pricing discipline. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, the Company’s average dealer discount on Contracts purchased decreased to 6.9%, compared to 7.5% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The table below shows the number
7
and principal amount of Contracts purchased, average amount financed, average term, and average APR and discount for the periods presented:
Key Performance Indicators on Contracts Purchased |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Purchases in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fiscal Year |
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|||||||
/Quarter |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Purchased# |
|
|
Financed*^ |
|
|
APR* |
|
|
|
Discount%* |
|
|
|
Term* |
|
|||||||
|
2022 |
|
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
$ |
85,804 |
|
|
$ |
11,002 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
% |
|
|
6.9 |
|
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
27,139 |
|
|
|
11,289 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
% |
|
6.9 |
|
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
19,480 |
|
|
|
11,228 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
% |
|
|
6.8 |
|
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
18,880 |
|
|
|
11,061 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
% |
|
|
6.7 |
|
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
20,305 |
|
|
|
10,429 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
% |
|
|
7.0 |
|
% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
7,307 |
|
|
$ |
74,025 |
|
|
$ |
10,135 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
% |
|
|
7.5 |
|
% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
24,637 |
|
|
|
10,143 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
% |
|
7.5 |
|
% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,483 |
|
|
|
15,285 |
|
|
|
10,307 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
% |
|
|
7.5 |
|
% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
17,307 |
|
|
|
10,127 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
% |
|
|
6.8 |
|
% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
16,796 |
|
|
|
9,962 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
% |
|
|
8.0 |
|
% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
7,647 |
|
|
$ |
76,696 |
|
|
$ |
10,035 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
% |
|
|
7.9 |
|
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
19,658 |
|
|
|
9,873 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
% |
|
7.9 |
|
% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,753 |
|
|
|
17,880 |
|
|
|
10,200 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
% |
|
7.6 |
|
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
20,104 |
|
|
|
9,997 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
% |
|
7.9 |
|
% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
19,054 |
|
|
|
10,071 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
% |
|
8.3 |
|
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
7,684 |
|
|
$ |
77,499 |
|
|
$ |
10,086 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
% |
|
|
8.2 |
|
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
21,233 |
|
|
|
9,871 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
% |
|
|
8.0 |
|
% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
16,476 |
|
|
|
10,139 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
% |
|
|
8.1 |
|
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
17,845 |
|
|
|
10,133 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
% |
|
|
8.4 |
|
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
21,945 |
|
|
|
10,221 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
% |
|
|
8.3 |
|
% |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Key Performance Indicators on Direct Loans Originated |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Originations in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fiscal Year |
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
/Quarter |
|
|
Originated |
|
|
Originated# |
|
|
Financed*^ |
|
|
APR* |
|
|
|
Term* |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
2022 |
|
|
|
6,770 |
|
|
$ |
28,740 |
|
|
$ |
4,307 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
% |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
7,458 |
|
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
% |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
% |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
7,040 |
|
|
|
4,433 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
% |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
5,737 |
|
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
30.1 |
|
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2021 |
|
|
|
3,497 |
|
|
$ |
14,148 |
|
|
$ |
4,131 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
|
4,362 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
|
3,641 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
% |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
28.7 |
|
% |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2020 |
|
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
$ |
12,638 |
|
|
$ |
4,017 |
|
|
28.2 |
|
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
4 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
3,104 |
|
|
|
4,310 |
|
|
28.6 |
|
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
3,949 |
|
|
28.4 |
|
% |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
27.4 |
|
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
1 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
28.2 |
|
% |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2019 |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
$ |
7,741 |
|
|
$ |
4,036 |
|
|
26.4 |
|
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
4 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
4,654 |
|
|
27.3 |
|
% |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
3 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
25.9 |
|
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
26.5 |
|
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
1 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
25.7 |
|
% |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
*Each average included in the tables is calculated as a simple average. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
^Average amount financed is calculated as a single loan amount. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#Bulk portfolio purchase excluded for period-over-period comparability. |
|
8
The Company’s ability to compete effectively with other companies offering similar financing arrangements depends in part upon the Company maintaining close business relationships with dealers of used and new vehicles. No single dealer out of the approximately 9,000 dealers with which the Company currently has active contractual relationships represents a significant amount of the Company’s business volume for any of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 or 2021.
Regulation
The Company’s financing operations are subject to regulation, supervision and licensing under many federal, state and local statutes, regulations and ordinances. Additionally, the procedures that the Company must follow regarding the repossession of vehicles securing Contracts are regulated by each of the states in which the Company does business. Accordingly, the laws of such states, as well as applicable federal law, govern the Company’s operations. The following constitute certain of the existing federal, state and local statutes, regulations and ordinances with which the Company must comply:
9
Failure to comply with these laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Company by, among other things, limiting the jurisdictions in which the Company may operate, restricting the Company’s ability to realize the value of the collateral securing the Contracts, and making it more costly or burdensome to do business or resulting in potential liability. The volume of new or modified laws and regulations and the activity of agencies enforcing such law have increased in recent years in response to issues arising with respect to consumer lending. From time to time, legislation and regulations are enacted which increase the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among financial services providers. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations and taxation of financial institutions and financial services providers are frequently made in the U.S. Congress, in the state legislatures and by various regulatory agencies. This legislation may change the Company’s operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways and may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
In particular, the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations promulgated thereunder, including the rules regarding supervision and examination issued by the CFPB, are likely to affect the Company’s cost of doing business, may limit or expand the Company’s permissible activities, may affect the competitive balance within the Company’s industry and market areas and could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company’s management continues to assess the Dodd-Frank Act’s probable impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, and to monitor developments involving the entities charged with promulgating regulations thereunder. However, the ultimate effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on the financial services industry in general, and on the Company in particular, is uncertain at this time.
In addition to the CFPB, other state and federal agencies have the ability to regulate aspects of the Company’s business. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act provides a mechanism for state Attorneys General to investigate the Company. In addition, the Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction to investigate aspects of the Company’s business. The Company expects that regulatory investigation by both state and federal agencies will continue and that the results of these investigations could have a material adverse impact on the Company.
10
Dealers with which the Company does business must also comply with credit and trade practice statutes and regulations. Failure of these dealers to comply with such statutes and regulations could result in customers having rights of rescission and other remedies that could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The sale of vehicle service contracts and other ancillary products by dealers in connection with Contracts assigned to the Company from dealers is also subject to state laws and regulations. As the Company is the holder of the Contracts that may, in part, finance these products, some of these state laws and regulations may apply to the Company’s servicing and collection of the Contracts. Although these laws and regulations may not significantly affect the Company’s business, there can be no assurance that insurance or other regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in which these products are offered by dealers will not seek to regulate or restrict the operation of the Company’s business in these jurisdictions. Any regulation or restriction of the Company’s business in these jurisdictions could materially adversely affect the income received from these products.
The Company’s management believes that the Company maintains all requisite licenses and permits and is in material compliance with applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations. The Company periodically reviews its branch office practices in an effort to ensure such compliance. Although compliance with existing laws and regulations has not had a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations to date, given the increasingly complex regulatory environment, the increasing costs of complying with such laws and regulations, and the increasing risk of penalties, fines or other liabilities associated therewith, no assurances can be given that the Company is in material compliance with all of such laws or regulations or that the costs of such compliance, or the failure to be in such compliance, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
For more information, please refer to the risk factors titled “On October 5, 2017, the CFPB released the final rule Payday, Vehicle Title and Certain High-Cost Installment Loans under the Dodd Frank Act, which as adopted could potentially have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial performance”, “The CFPB has broad authority to pursue administrative proceedings and litigation for violations of federal consumer financing laws” and “Pursuant to the authority granted to it under the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB adopted rules that subject larger nonbank automobile finance companies to supervision and examination by the CFPB. Any such examination by the CFPB likely would have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial performance”, which are incorporated herein by reference.
In July 2020, the CFPB rescinded provisions of the Rule governing the ability to repay requirements. Currently, the payment requirements are scheduled to take effect in June 2022. Any regulatory changes could have effects beyond those currently contemplated that could further materially and adversely impact our business and operations. Unless rescinded or otherwise amended, the Company will have to comply with the Rule’s payment requirements if it continues to allow consumers to set up future recurring payments online for certain covered loans such that it meets the definition of having a “leveraged payment mechanism” under the Rule. If the payment provisions of the Rule apply, the Company will have to modify its loan payment procedures to comply with the required notices and mandated timeframes set forth in the final rule.
Human Capital Resources
The Company’s management and various support functions are centralized at the Company’s corporate headquarters in Clearwater, Florida. As of March 31, 2022, the Company employed a total of 278 persons, of which 51 persons were employed at the Company’s Clearwater and Charlotte Corporate offices. None of the Company’s employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement, and the Company considers its relations with its employees generally to be good.
We are also committed to fostering, cultivating, and preserving a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DE&I”). We believe that the collective sum of the individual differences, life experiences, knowledge, inventiveness, self-expression, unique capabilities, and talent that our employees invest in their work represent a significant part of our culture, reputation, and achievement. We believe that an emphasis on DE&I drives value for our employees, customers, and stockholders, and that our DE&I commitment enables us to better serve our communities.
In fiscal year 2022, we also focused on and invested in maintaining the health and safety of our employees in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.
11
We also offer our employees a variety of training and development opportunities. New employees complete a comprehensive training curriculum that focuses on the company- and position-specific competencies needed to be successful. The training includes a blended approach utilizing eLearning modules, hands-on exercises, webinars, and assessments. Training content is focused on our operating policies and procedures, as well as several key compliance areas.
12
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following factors, as well as other factors not set forth below, may adversely affect the business, operations, financial condition or results of operations of the Company (sometimes referred to in this section as “we” “us” or “our”).
Risks Related to COVID-19
The extent to which COVID-19 and measures taken in response thereto impact our business, results of operations and financial condition will continue to depend on factors outside of our control. COVID-19 has had and is likely to continue to have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition and heightens many of our known risks.
The outbreak of the global pandemic of COVID-19 and resultant economic effects of preventative measures taken across the United States and worldwide have been weighing on the macroeconomic environment, negatively impacting consumer confidence, employment rates and other economic indicators that contribute to consumer spending behavior and demand for credit. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our business, results of operations and financial condition will continue to depend on factors outside of our control, which are highly uncertain and difficult to predict, including, but not limited to, the duration and spread of the outbreak in light of different levels of vaccination across the globe and new variants of the virus or additional waves of cases, its severity, actions to contain the virus or treat its impact, and whether the recently observable resumption of pre-pandemic economic and operating conditions in the United States can continue in light of inflationary pressure and higher insurance costs. For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
In addition, the spread of COVID-19 has caused us to modify our business practices (including restricting employee travel, developing social distancing plans for our employees and cancelling physical participation in meetings, events and conferences), and we may take further actions as may be required by government authorities or as we determine is in the best interests of our employees, partners and customers. The outbreak has adversely impacted and may further adversely impact our workforce and operations and the operations of our partners, customers, suppliers and third-party vendors, throughout the time period during which the spread of COVID-19 continues and related restrictions remain in place, and even after the COVID-19 outbreak has subsided.
Even after the COVID-19 outbreak has subsided, our business may continue to experience materially adverse impacts as a result of the virus’s economic impact, including the availability and cost of funding and any recession that has occurred or may occur in the future. There are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the effect COVID-19 as a global pandemic may have, and, as a result, the ultimate impact of the outbreak is highly uncertain and subject to change.
Additionally, many of the other risk factors described below are heightened by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic conditions, which in turn could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to financing and liquidity.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Our success is dependent on our ability to forecast the performance of our Contracts and Direct Loans.
We have in the past experienced and may in the future experience high delinquency and loss rates in our portfolios. This has in the past reduced and may continue to reduce our profitability. In addition, our inability to accurately forecast and estimate the amount and timing of future collections could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity and results of operations.
Our consolidated net income for the year ended March 31, 2022 was $3.0 million as compared to net income of $8.4 million for the year ended March 31, 2021. Our profitability depends, to a material extent, on the performance of contracts that we purchase. Historically, we have experienced higher delinquency rates than traditional financial institutions because substantially all of our Contracts and Direct Loans are to non-prime borrowers, who are unable to obtain financing from traditional sources due primarily to their credit history. Contracts and Direct Loans made to
13
these individuals generally entail a higher risk of delinquency, default, repossession, and higher losses than loans made to consumers with better credit.
Our underwriting standards and collection procedures may not offer adequate protection against the risk of default, especially in periods of economic uncertainty. In the event of a default, the collateral value of the financed vehicle usually does not cover the outstanding Contract or Direct Loan balance and costs of recovery.
Our ability to accurately forecast performance and determine an appropriate provision and allowance for credit losses is critical to our business and financial results. The allowance for credit losses is established through a provision for credit losses based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in the portfolio, the composition of the portfolio, specific impaired Contracts and Direct Loans, and current economic conditions. Please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Estimate” in Item 7 of this Form 10-K and which is incorporated herein by reference.
There can be no assurance that our performance forecasts will be accurate. In periods with changing economic conditions, such as is the case currently, accurately forecasting the performance of Contract and Direct Loans is more difficult. Our allowance for losses is an estimate, and if actual Contract and Direct Loan losses are materially greater than our allowance for losses, or more generally, if our forecasts are not accurate, our financial position, liquidity and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. For example, uncertainty surrounding the continuing economic impact of COVID-19 and the indirect effects of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, whether through increases in the price of gasoline and other consumer goods or otherwise, on our customers has made historical information on credit losses slightly less reliable in the current environment, and there can be no assurances that we have accurately estimated loan losses.
Other than limited representations and warranties made by dealers in favor of the Company, Contracts are purchased from the dealers without recourse, and we are therefore only able to look to the borrowers for repayment.
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Among other things, the amendments in this ASU require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. The ASU also requires additional disclosures related to estimates and judgments used to measure all expected credit losses. For smaller reporting companies like us, the new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2022, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on the consolidated financial statements and is collecting and analyzing data that will be needed to produce historical inputs into any models created as a result of adopting this ASU. At this time, the Company believes the adoption of this ASU will likely have a material effect and is expected to increase the overall allowance for credit losses.
We operate in an increasingly competitive market.
The non-prime consumer-finance industry is highly competitive, and the competitiveness of the market continues to increase as new competitors continue to enter the market and certain existing competitors continue to expand their operations and become more aggressive in offering competitive terms. There are numerous financial service companies that provide consumer credit in the markets served by us, including banks, credit unions, other consumer finance companies and captive finance companies owned by automobile manufacturers and retailers. Many of these competitors have substantially greater financial resources than us. In addition, some of our competitors often provide financing on terms more favorable to automobile purchasers or dealers than we offer. Many of these competitors also have long-standing relationships with automobile dealerships and may offer dealerships, or their customers,
14
other forms of financing including dealer floor-plan financing and leasing, which are not provided by us. Providers of non-prime consumer financing have traditionally competed primarily on the basis of:
Our ability to compete effectively with other companies offering similar financing arrangements depends in part on our ability to maintain close relationships with dealers of used and new vehicles. We may not be able to compete successfully in this market or against these competitors. In recent years, it has become increasingly difficult for the Company to match or exceed pricing of its competitors, which has generally resulted in declining Contract acquisition rates during the 2021 and 2022 fiscal years.
We have focused on a segment of the market composed of consumers who typically do not meet the more stringent credit requirements of traditional consumer financing sources and whose needs, as a result, have not been addressed consistently by such financing sources. As new and existing providers of consumer financing have undertaken to penetrate our targeted market segment, we have experienced increasing pressure to reduce our interest rates, fees and dealer discounts. The Company’s average dealer discount on Contracts purchased for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 was 6.9% and 7.5%, respectively. The Company’s average APR on Contracts purchased for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, was 23.1% and 23.4%, respectively. These competitive factors continue to exist and may impact our ability to secure quality loans on our preferred terms in significant quantities.
In addition, the number of Contracts and Direct Loans under which customers decided to discontinue contractually required payments to us after they were approved by other lenders for new vehicle financing has recently increased. We are particularly vulnerable to the effects of these practices because of our focus on providing financing with respect to used vehicles.
Our business depends on our continued access to bank financing on acceptable terms.
On November 4, 2021, we entered into a new senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). Our ability to access capital through our Credit Facility, or undertake a future facility, or other debt or equity transactions on economically favorable terms or at all, depends in large part on factors that are beyond our control, including:
15
Our Credit Facility is subject to certain defaults and negative covenants.
The Credit Facility’s loan documents contain customary events of default and negative covenants, including but not limited to those governing indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes, investments, and sales of assets. Such loan documents also restrict the Company’s ability to make distributions to its shareholders, enter into certain fundamental transactions, or make bulk purchases of receivables. If an event of default occurs, the lenders could increase borrowing costs, restrict our ability to obtain additional advances under the Credit Facility, accelerate all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility, enforce their interest against collateral pledged under the Credit Facility or enforce such other rights and remedies as they have under the loan documents or applicable law as secured lenders.
If the lenders terminate the Credit Facility following the occurrence of an event of default under the loan documents, or we prepay the loan and terminate the Credit Facility prior to the Maturity Date, then the Borrowers are obligated to pay a termination or prepayment fee in an amount equal to a percentage of $175,000,000, calculated as 2% if the termination or prepayment occurs during year one, 1% if the termination or repayment occurs during year two, and 0.5% if the termination or prepayment occurs thereafter.
Our existing and future levels of indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health, ability to obtain financing in the future, ability to react to changes in our business and ability to fulfill our obligations under such indebtedness.
As of March 31, 2022, we had aggregate outstanding indebtedness, under our Credit Facility of $55.0 million compared to $88.3 million under the predecessor facility as of March 31, 2021. This level of indebtedness could:
On May 27, 2020, the Company obtained a loan in the amount of $3,243,900 from a bank in connection with the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP Loan”). Pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program, all or a portion of the PPP Loan may be forgiven if the Company uses the proceeds of the PPP Loan for its payroll costs and other expenses in accordance with the requirements of the Paycheck Protection Program. The Company used the proceeds of the PPP Loan for payroll costs and other covered expenses and sought full forgiveness of the PPP Loan. The Company submitted a forgiveness application to Fifth Third Bank, the lender, on December 7, 2020 and submitted supplemental documentation on January 16, 2021. On December 27, 2021 SBA informed the Company that no forgiveness was granted. The Company filed an appeal with SBA on January 5, 2022. On May 6, 2022 the Office of Hearing and Appeals SBA (OHA) rendered a decision to deny the
16
appeal. The Company subsequently repaid the outstanding principal of $3,243,900 plus accrued and unpaid interest of $64,518 on May 23, 2022.
Any of the foregoing impacts of our level of indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on us.
An increase in market interest rates may reduce our profitability.
Our long-term profitability may be directly affected by the level of and fluctuations in interest rates. Sustained, significant increases in interest rates may adversely affect our liquidity and profitability by reducing the interest rate spread between the rate of interest we receive on our Contracts and interest rates that we pay under our Credit Facility. As interest rates increase, our gross interest rate spread on new originations will generally decline since the rates charged on the contracts originated or purchased from dealers generally are limited by statutory maximums, restricting our opportunity to pass on increased interest costs.
Currently, due to a number of factors including the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine and supply chain problems caused in part by the COVID-19 pandemic, the global economy is experiencing inflationary pressures not seen in a significant period of time. We cannot predict the timing or the duration of any inflation. More specifically, we cannot predict whether the inflationary pressure will reduce our interest rate spread and therefore our profitability.
We monitor the interest rate environment and, on occasion, enter into interest rate swap agreements relating to a portion of our outstanding debt. Such agreements effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on our interest expense. However, we have not recently entered into new arrangements. We will continue to evaluate interest rate swap pricing and we may or may not enter into interest rate swap agreements in the future.
We have recently experienced turnover in our senior management. The loss of our key executives could have a material adverse effect on our business.
On May 6, 2022, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) informed the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) of his intention to resign his position as President and Chief Executive Officer, and to retire from the Board, in each case, effective as of May 9, 2022.
On May 10, 2022, the Company entered into a separation and release of claims agreement with the previous CEO. Pursuant to the agreement, the previous CEO’s resignation was effective as of May 9, 2022. In addition to unpaid salary and accrued vacation pay through May 9, 2022, the previous CEO is entitled to receive a severance payment of $131,250 and continuation of COBRA benefits for 4.5 months. His restricted stock awards continue to be governed by the award agreements for each award, with all unvested restricted stock forfeited. The separation and release of claims agreement contains a one year non-compete provision, and prohibits the previous CEO from soliciting customers for one year and Company employees for two years.
On May 9, 2022, the Board appointed a new Interim Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately. The Interim CEO has worked at the Company for more than 20 years. Prior to his appointment, the Interim CEO served as Vice President of Branch Operations for the Company since April 2021, as Divisional Vice President from June 2018 until April 2021, as District Manager from December 2010 until June 2018, and as Branch Manager from December 2001 until December 2010.
We are subject to risks associated with litigation.
As a consumer finance company, we are subject to various consumer claims and litigation seeking damages and statutory penalties, based upon, among other things:
17
Some litigation against us could take the form of class action complaints by consumers. As the assignee of Contracts originated by dealers, we may also be named as a co-defendant in lawsuits filed by consumers principally against dealers. The damages and penalties claimed by consumers in these types of actions can be substantial. The relief requested by the plaintiffs varies but may include requests for compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages. We also are periodically subject to other kinds of litigation typically experienced by businesses such as ours, including employment disputes and breach of contract claims. No assurances can be given that we will not experience material financial losses in the future as a result of litigation or other legal proceedings.
We depend upon our relationships with our dealers.
Our business depends in large part upon our ability to establish and maintain relationships with reputable dealers who originate the Contracts we purchase. Although we believe we have been successful in developing and maintaining such relationships, such relationships are not exclusive, and many of them are not longstanding. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in maintaining such relationships or increasing the number of dealers with whom we do business, or that our existing dealer base will continue to generate a volume of Contracts comparable to the volume of such Contracts historically generated by such dealers.
Our business is highly dependent upon general economic conditions.
We are subject to changes in general economic conditions that are beyond our control. During periods of economic uncertainty, such as has existed for much of the past years, delinquencies, defaults, repossessions, and losses generally increase, absent offsetting factors. These periods also may be accompanied by decreased consumer demand for automobiles and declining values of automobiles securing outstanding loans, which weakens collateral coverage on our loans and increases the amount of a loss we would experience in the event of default. Because we focus on non-prime borrowers, the actual rates of delinquencies, defaults, repossessions, and losses on these loans are higher than those experienced in the general automobile finance industry and could be more dramatically affected by a general economic downturn. In addition, during an economic slowdown or recession, our servicing costs may increase without a corresponding increase in our servicing income. No assurances can be given that our underwriting criteria and collection methods to manage the higher risk inherent in loans made to non-prime borrowers will afford adequate protection against these risks. Any sustained period of increased delinquencies, defaults, repossessions, or losses, or increased servicing costs could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Furthermore, in a low interest-rate environment such as has existed in the United States in recent years, the level of competition increases in the non-prime consumer-finance industry as new competitors enter the market and many existing competitors expand their operations. Such increased competition, in turn, has exerted increased pressure on us to reduce our interest rates, fees, and dealer discount rates in order to maintain our market share. Any further reductions in our interest rates, fees or dealer discount rates could have a material adverse impact on our profitability or financial condition.
The auction proceeds we receive from the sale of repossessed vehicles and other recoveries are subject to fluctuation due to economic and other factors beyond our control.
If we repossess a vehicle securing a Contract, we typically have it transported to an automobile auction for sale. Auction proceeds from the sale of repossessed vehicles and other recoveries are usually not sufficient to cover the outstanding balance of the Contract, and the resulting deficiency is charged off. In addition, there is, on average, approximately a 30-day lapse between the time we repossess a vehicle and the time it is sold. The proceeds we receive from such sales depend upon various factors, including the supply of, and demand for, used vehicles at the time of sale. Such supply and demand are dependent on many factors. For example, during periods of economic uncertainty, the demand for used cars may soften, resulting in decreased auction proceeds to us from the sale of
18
repossessed automobiles. Furthermore, depressed wholesale prices for used automobiles may result from significant liquidations of rental or fleet inventories, and from increased volume of trade-ins due to promotional financing programs offered by new vehicle manufacturers. Newer, more expensive vehicles securing our larger dollar loans are more susceptible to wholesale pricing fluctuations than are older vehicles and also experience depreciation at a much greater rate. Until the Company’s portfolio has been successfully converted to primarily consisting of our target vehicle (primary transportation to and from work for the subprime borrower), the Company expects to be affected by softer auction activity and reduced vehicle values.
We partially rely on third parties to deliver services, and failure by those parties to provide these services or meet contractual requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We depend on third-party service providers for many aspects of our business operations, including loan origination, title processing, and online payments, which increases our operational complexity and decreases our control. We rely on these service providers to provide a high level of service and support, which subjects us to risks associated with inadequate or untimely service. If a service provider fails to provide the services that we require or expect, or fails to meet contractual requirements, such as service levels or compliance with applicable laws, a failure could negatively impact our business by adversely affecting our ability to process customers’ transactions in a timely and accurate manner, otherwise hampering our ability to service our customers, or subjecting us to litigation or regulatory risk for poor vendor oversight. We may be unable to replace or be delayed in replacing these sources and there is a risk that we would be unable to enter into a similar agreement with an alternate provider on terms that we consider favorable or in a timely manner. Such a failure could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our growth depends upon our ability to retain and attract a sufficient number of qualified employees.
To a large extent, our growth strategy depends on the opening of new offices that focus primarily on purchasing Contracts and making Direct Loans in markets we have not previously served. Future expansion of our branch office network depends, in part, upon our ability to attract and retain qualified and experienced office managers and the ability of such managers to develop relationships with dealers that serve those markets. We generally do not open a new office until we have located and hired a qualified and experienced individual to manage the office. Typically, this individual will be familiar with local market conditions and have existing relationships with dealers in the area to be served. Although we believe that we can attract and retain qualified and experienced personnel as we proceed with planned expansion into new markets, no assurance can be given that we will be successful in doing so. Competition to hire personnel possessing the skills and experience required by us could contribute to an increase in our employee turnover rate. High turnover or an inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could have an adverse effect on our origination, delinquency, default, and net loss rates and, ultimately, our business and financial condition.
Natural disasters, acts of war, terrorist attacks and threats, or the escalation of military activity in response to these attacks or otherwise may negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Natural disasters (such as hurricanes), acts of war, terrorist attacks and the escalation of military activity in response to these attacks or otherwise may have negative and significant effects, such as disruptions in our operations, imposition of increased security measures, changes in applicable laws, market disruptions and job losses. Our headquarters are located in Clearwater, Florida and much of our revenue is generated in Florida. Florida is particularly susceptible to hurricanes. These events may have an adverse effect on the economy in general. Moreover, the potential for future terrorist attacks and the national and international responses to these threats could affect the business in ways that cannot be predicted. The effect of any of these events or threats could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Regulation
On October 5, 2017, the CFPB released the final rule Payday, Vehicle Title and Certain High-Cost Installment Loans under the Dodd Frank Act, which as adopted could potentially have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial performance.
19
In 2017, the CFPB adopted rules applicable to payday, title and certain high cost installment loans. The rules address the underwriting of covered short-term loans and longer-term balloon-payment loans, including payday and vehicle title loans, as well as related reporting and recordkeeping provisions. These provisions have become known as the “mandatory underwriting provisions” and include rules for lenders to follow to determine whether or not consumers have the ability to repay the loans according to their terms. Implementation of the rule’s payment requirements may require changes to the Company’s practices and procedures for such loans, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s ability to make such loans, the cost of making such loans, the Company’s ability to, or frequency with which it could, refinance any such loans, and the profitability of such loans. Additionally, the CFPB may target specific features of loans by rulemaking that could cause us to cease offering certain products, or adopt rules imposing new and potentially burdensome requirements and limitations with respect to any of our current or future lines of business, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial performance. The CFPB could also implement rules that limit our ability to continue servicing our financial products and services.
The CFPB has broad authority to pursue administrative proceedings and litigation for violations of federal consumer financing laws.
The CFPB has the authority to obtain cease and desist orders (which can include orders for restitution or rescission of contracts, as well as other kinds of affirmative relief) and monetary penalties ranging from $5,000 per day for minor violations of federal consumer financial laws (including the CFPB’s own rules) to $25,000 per day for reckless violations and $1 million per day for knowing violations. If we are subject to such administrative proceedings, litigation, orders or monetary penalties in the future, this could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial performance. Also, where a company has violated Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act or CFPB regulations under Title X, the Dodd-Frank Act empowers state attorneys general and state regulators to bring civil actions for the kind of cease and desist orders available to the CFPB (but not for civil penalties). If the CFPB or one or more state officials believe we have violated the foregoing laws, they could exercise their enforcement powers in ways that would have a material adverse effect on us. See “Item 1. Business – Regulation” for additional information.
Pursuant to the authority granted to it under the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB adopted rules that subject larger nonbank automobile finance companies to supervision and examination by the CFPB. Any such examination by the CFPB likely would have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial performance.
The CFPB defines a “larger participant” of automobile financing if it has at least 10,000 aggregate annual originations. The Company does not meet the threshold of at least 10,000 aggregate annual direct loan originations, and therefore would not fall under the CFPB’s supervisory authority. The CFPB issued rules regarding the supervision and examination of non-depository “larger participants” in the automobile finance business. The CFPB’s stated objectives of such examinations are: to assess the quality of a larger participant’s compliance management systems for preventing violations of federal consumer financial laws; to identify acts or practices that materially increase the risk of violations of federal consumer finance laws and associated harm to consumers; and to gather facts that help determine whether the larger participant engages in acts or practices that are likely to violate federal consumer financial laws in connection with its automobile finance business. At such time, as we become or the CFPB defines us as a larger participant, we will be subject to examination by the CFPB for, among other things, ECOA compliance; unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices (“UDAAP”) compliance; and the adequacy of our compliance management systems.
We have continued to evaluate our existing compliance management systems. We expect this process to continue as the CFPB promulgates new and evolving rules and interpretations. Given the time and effort needed to establish, implement and maintain adequate compliance management systems and the resources and costs associated with being examined by the CFPB, such an examination could likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and profitability. Moreover, any such examination by the CFPB could result in the assessment of penalties, including fines, and other remedies which could, in turn, have a material effect on our business, financial condition, and profitability.
In July 2020, the CFPB rescinded provisions of the Rule governing the ability to repay requirements. Currently, the payment requirements are scheduled to take effect in June 2022. Any regulatory changes could have effects beyond those currently contemplated that could further materially and adversely impact our business and operations. Unless rescinded or otherwise amended, the Company will have to comply with the Rule’s payment requirements if it continues to allow consumers to set up future recurring payments online for certain covered loans such that it meets
20
the definition of having a “leveraged payment mechanism” under the Rule. If the payment provisions of the Rule apply, the Company will have to modify its loan payment procedures to comply with the required notices and mandated timeframes set forth in the final rule.
We are subject to many other laws and governmental regulations, and any material violations of or changes in these laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and business operations.
Our financing operations are subject to regulation, supervision, and licensing under various other federal, state and local statutes and ordinances. Additionally, the procedures that we must follow in connection with the repossession of vehicles securing Contracts are regulated by each of the states in which we do business. The various federal, state and local statutes, regulations, and ordinances applicable to our business govern, among other things:
We believe that we maintain all material licenses and permits required for our current operations and are in substantial compliance with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. Our failure, or the failure by dealers who originate the Contracts we purchase, to maintain all requisite licenses and permits, and to comply with other regulatory requirements, could result in consumers having rights of rescission and other remedies that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. Furthermore, any changes in applicable laws, rules and regulations, such as the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act and the creation of the CFPB, may make our compliance therewith more difficult or expensive or otherwise materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Some litigation against us could take the form of class action complaints by consumers. As the assignee of contracts originated by dealers, we may also be named as a co-defendant in lawsuits filed by consumers principally against dealers. The damages and penalties claimed by consumers in these types of actions can be substantial. The relief requested by the plaintiffs varies but may include requests for compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages. We also are periodically subject to other kinds of litigation typically experienced by businesses such as ours, including employment disputes and breach of contract claims. No assurances can be given that we will not experience material financial losses in the future as a result of litigation or other legal proceedings.
Risks Related to Privacy and Cybersecurity
Failure to properly safeguard confidential customer information could subject us to liability, decrease our profitability, and damage our reputation.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of our customers, on our computer networks, and share such data with third parties. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy.
21
Any failure, interruption, or breach in our cyber security, including through employee misconduct or any failure of our back-up systems or failure to maintain adequate security surrounding customer information, could result in reputational harm, disruption in the management of our customer relationships, or the inability to originate, process and service our products. Further, any of these cyber security and operational risks could result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to lawsuits by customers for identity theft or other damages resulting from the misuse of their personal information and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In addition, regulators may impose penalties or require remedial action if they identify weaknesses in our security systems, and we may be required to incur significant costs to increase our cyber security to address any vulnerabilities that may be discovered or to remediate the harm caused by any security breaches. As part of our business, we may share confidential customer information and proprietary information with clients, vendors, service providers, and business partners. The information systems of these third parties may be vulnerable to security breaches and we may not be able to ensure that these third parties have appropriate security controls in place to protect the information we share with them. If our confidential information is intercepted, stolen, misused, or mishandled while in possession of a third party, it could result in reputational harm to us, loss of customer business, and additional regulatory scrutiny, and it could expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.
We rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties to provide the security and authentication necessary to secure online transmission of confidential customer information. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments may result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms that we use to protect sensitive customer data. A party who is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions in our operations. We may be required to expend capital and other resources to protect against, or alleviate problems caused by, security breaches or other cybersecurity incidents. Although we have not experienced any material cybersecurity incidents to dates, there can be no assurance that a cyber-attack, security breach or other cybersecurity incident will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations in the future. Our security measures are designed to protect against security breaches, but our failure to prevent security breaches could subject us to liability, decrease our profitability and damage our reputation.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
Our stock is thinly traded, which may limit your ability to resell your shares.
The average daily trading volume of our common shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 was approximately 9,100 shares, which makes ours a thinly traded stock. Thinly traded stocks pose several risks for investors because they have wider spreads and less displayed size than other stocks that trade in higher volumes or an active trading market. Other risks posed by thinly traded stocks include difficulty selling the stock, challenges attracting market makers to make markets in the stock, and difficulty with financings. Our financial results, the introduction of new products and services by us or our competitors, and various factors affecting the consumer-finance industry generally may also have a significant impact on the market price of our common shares. In recent years, the stock market has experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and market prices for the stocks of many companies, including ours, have experienced wide price fluctuations that have not necessarily been related to their operating performance. These risks could affect a shareholder’s ability to sell their shares at the volumes, prices, or times that they desire.
We currently do not have any analysts covering our stock which could negatively impact both the stock price and trading volume of our stock.
The trading market for our common stock will likely be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. We do not currently have, and may never obtain, research coverage by financial analysts. If no or few analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price of our stock may not increase. Even if we do obtain analyst coverage, if one or more of the analysts covering our business downgrade their evaluation of our stock, the price of our stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover our stock, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline. Furthermore, if our operating results fail to meet analysts’ expectations our stock price would likely decline.
22
Some provisions of our Articles may deter third parties from acquiring us and diminish the value of our common stock.
Our Articles provide for, among other things:
These provisions may discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our Company that is in the best interest of our stockholders. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if they are viewed as discouraging future takeover attempts. These provisions could also make it more difficult for stockholders to nominate directors for election to our board of directors and take other corporate actions.
We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in SEC regulations, and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.
We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined under SEC regulations and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not smaller reporting companies including, among other things, reduced financial disclosure requirements including being permitted to provide only two years of audited financial statements and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information that they may deem important. We could remain a smaller reporting company indefinitely. As a smaller reporting company, investors may deem our stock less attractive and, as a result, there may be less active trading of our common stock, and our stock price may be more volatile.
General Risk Factors
We have in the past had material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures could lead to a loss of investor confidence in our financial statements and have an adverse effect on our stock price.
In fiscal 2021, we remediated each of the two material weaknesses that were previously identified and were disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. See "Item 9A. Controls and Procedures—Remediation of Material Weaknesses."
However, we may in the future discover areas of our internal financial and accounting controls and procedures that need improvement. Our internal control over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, regardless of how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected.
If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner, or if we are unable to maintain proper and effective internal controls, we may not be able to produce timely and accurate financial statements. If that were to happen, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could lead to a decline in the market price of our common stock and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities.
Additionally, the existence of any material weakness could require management to devote significant time and incur significant expense to remediate any such material weakness and management may not be able to remediate any such material weakness in a timely manner. The existence of any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could also result in errors in our financial statements that could require us to restate our financial
23
statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and cause the holders of our common stock to lose confidence in our reported financial information, all of which could materially adversely affect our business and share price.
We may experience problems with integrated computer systems or be unable to keep pace with developments in technology or conversion to new integrated computer systems.
We use various technologies in our business, including telecommunication, data processing, and integrated computer systems. Technology changes rapidly. Our ability to compete successfully with other financing companies may depend on our ability to efficiently and cost-effectively implement technological changes. Moreover, to keep pace with our competitors, we may be required to invest in technological changes that do not necessarily improve our profitability.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
The Company leases its corporate headquarters and branch office facilities. The Company’s headquarters, located at 2454 McMullen Booth Road, Building C, in Clearwater, Florida, consist of approximately 14,900 square feet of office space leased at an annual rate of approximately $15.58 per square foot. The current lease relating to this space was entered into effective April 1, 2015 and expires on March 31, 2023. The Company’s central business operations hub, located at 3600 Arco Corporate Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28273, consist of approximately 8,400 square feet of office space leased at an annual rate of approximately $25.65 per square foot. The current lease relating to this space was entered into effective August 1, 2021 and expires on February 28, 2029.
As of March 31, 2022, each of the Company’s 47 branch offices located in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin consists of approximately 1,700 square feet of office space (Idaho and Texas are expansion states with no local branch office). The Company acquires Contracts in Idaho and Texas through its virtual expansion office operations based in the Charlotte, North Carolina corporate location. These offices are located in office parks, shopping centers, or strip malls and are occupied pursuant to leases with an initial term of one to five years at annual rates ranging from approximately $4.00 to $33.00 per square foot. The Company believes that these facilities and additional or alternate space available to it are adequate to meet its needs for the foreseeable future.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Company currently is not a party to any pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business, none of which, if decided adversely to the Company, would, in the opinion of management, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
24
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company’s common shares are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “NICK.”
As of June 10, 2022, there were approximately 117 holders of record of the Company’s common shares.
The Company has not declared and paid cash dividends on its common shares in the recent past and has no current plans to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. There are no Canadian foreign exchange controls or laws that would affect the remittance of dividends or other payments to the Company’s non-Canadian resident shareholders. There are no Canadian laws that restrict the export or import of capital, other than the Investment Canada Act (Canada), which requires the notification or review of certain investments by non-Canadians to establish or acquire control of a Canadian business. The Company is not a Canadian business as defined under the Investment Canada Act because it has no place of business in Canada, has no individuals employed in Canada in connection with its business, and has no assets in Canada used in carrying on its business.
Canada and the United States of America are signatories to the Convention Between the United States of America and Canada With Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital (the “Tax Treaty”). The Tax Treaty contains provisions governing the tax treatment of interest, dividends, gains, and royalties paid to or received by a person residing in the United States. The Tax Treaty also contains provisions to prevent the occurrence of double taxation, essentially by permitting the taxpayer to claim a tax credit for taxes paid in the foreign jurisdiction.
Earnings from U.S. subsidiaries are permanently invested in the U.S. The Company has not provided any Canadian income tax or U.S. withholding tax on unremitted earnings. If a dividend was paid to the Company from the current or accumulated earnings and profits of the U.S. subsidiary, the dividend would be subject to a U.S. withholding tax of 5%. The gross dividend (i.e., before payment of the withholding tax) would generally be included in the Company's Canadian taxable income. However, under certain circumstances, the Company may be allowed to deduct the dividends in the calculation of its Canadian taxable income. If the Company has no other foreign (i.e., non-Canadian) non-business income, no relief is available in that case to recover the withholding taxes previously paid.
A 15% Canadian withholding tax applies to dividends paid by the Company to a U.S. shareholder (including those that own less than 10% of the Company’s voting shares) that is an individual. The U.S. shareholder must include the gross amount of the dividends in the shareholder’s net income to be taxed at the regular rates. In general, a U.S. shareholder can obtain a foreign tax credit for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to the Canadian withholding tax on such dividends, but the amount of such credit is subject to a limitation that depends, in part, on the amount of the shareholder’s income and losses from other sources. A U.S. shareholder that is an individual also can elect to claim a deduction (rather than a foreign tax credit) for all non-U.S. income taxes paid by the shareholder during the particular year. The benefit of any deduction for foreign taxes may be negatively impacted by the overall limitation on deducting income and other taxes. U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax treatment of any Canadian withholding tax imposed on dividends from the Company.
25
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The tables below sets forth the information with respect to purchase made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act) of our shares of common stock during the final three months of Fiscal Year 2022:
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
|
|
Weighted Average Price Paid per Share |
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs |
|
||||
Period |
|
(In thousands, except for average price paid per share) |
|
|||||||||||||
January 1, 2022 to January 31, 2022 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
11.44 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
5,357 |
|
February 1, 2022 to February 28, 2022 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
11.32 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5,165 |
|
March 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10.92 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
5,056 |
|
Total |
|
|
40 |
|
|
$ |
11.26 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
In May 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors (“Board”) authorized a new stock repurchase program allowing for the repurchase of up to $8.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or through other structures in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. The authorization was effective immediately.
The timing and actual number of sharers will depend on a variety of factors, including stock price, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market and economic conditions. The Company’s stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
In August 2019, the Company’s Board authorized additional repurchase of up to $1.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares.
Item 6. [Reserved]
26
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Nicholas Financial-Canada is a Canadian holding company incorporated under the laws of British Columbia in 1986. Nicholas Financial-Canada currently conducts its business activities exclusively through a wholly-owned indirect Florida subsidiary, Nicholas Financial. Nicholas Financial is a specialized consumer finance company engaged primarily in acquiring and servicing automobile finance installment contracts (“Contracts”) for purchases of used and new automobiles and light trucks. To a lesser extent, Nicholas Financial also originates direct consumer loans (“Direct Loans”) and sells consumer-finance related products. Nicholas Financial’s financing activities represent a primary source of consolidated revenue for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. A second Florida subsidiary, Nicholas Data Services, Inc. (“NDS”), serves as an intermediate holding company for Nicholas Financial. In addition, NF Funding I, LLC (“NF Funding I”) is a wholly-owned, special purpose financing subsidiary of Nicholas Financial.
Nicholas Financial-Canada, Nicholas Financial, NDS, and NF Funding I are collectively referred to herein as the “Company”.
Introduction
The Company’s consolidated revenues decreased from $54.2 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 to $49.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022. The Company’s diluted earnings per share decreased from $1.09 per share for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 to $0.39 per share for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022. The Company’s operating income before income taxes decreased from $10.9 million for the year ended March 31, 2021 to $4.0 million for the year ended March 31, 2022. The $6.9 million decrease in profitability was primarily driven by a decrease in average finance receivables from $199.1 million to $178.7 million for the year ended March 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively, and the acceleration of unamortized debt issuance costs from the ARES facility (non-cash interest expense) in the amount of $1.9 million.
The Company’s consolidated net income decreased from $8.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 to $3.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022.
The gross portfolio yield of the portfolio for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 was 27.82% and 27.23%, respectively. For the years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the average dealer discount decreased from 7.5% to 6.9% primarily as a result of market conditions in the 2022 fiscal year. The APR (and therefore overall
27
yield) on new purchases was consistent in fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2021, which was primarily driven by the Company’s continuing commitment to its core principles of disciplined underwriting and risk-based pricing.
Portfolio Summary |
|
Fiscal Year ended March 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Average finance receivables (1) |
|
$ |
178,686 |
|
|
$ |
199,102 |
|
Average indebtedness (2) |
|
$ |
67,684 |
|
|
$ |
107,615 |
|
Interest and fee income on finance receivables |
|
|
49,779 |
|
|
|
54,211 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
5,980 |
|
Net interest and fee income on finance receivables |
|
$ |
44,348 |
|
|
$ |
48,231 |
|
Gross portfolio yield (3) |
|
|
27.86 |
% |
|
|
27.23 |
% |
Interest expense as a percentage of average finance |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
Provision for credit losses as a percentage of average |
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
Net portfolio yield (3) |
|
|
21.52 |
% |
|
|
20.59 |
% |
Operating expenses as a percentage of average finance |
|
|
19.25 |
% |
|
|
15.99 |
% |
Pre-tax yield as a percentage of average finance |
|
|
2.27 |
% |
|
|
4.60 |
% |
Net charge-off percentage (5) |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
6.16 |
% |
Finance receivables |
|
$ |
178,786 |
|
|
$ |
184,237 |
|
Allowance percentage (6) |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
3.34 |
% |
Total reserves percentage (7) |
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
7.49 |
% |
COVID-19
The expansion of unemployment benefits by the CARES Act, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to eligible individuals collectively had a beneficial effect on the Company. While pandemic unemployment assistance has been extended through September 6, 2021, the beneficial impact these benefits have had on the Company largely disappeared once its customers no longer qualified for such benefits. The Company continued to experience strong cash collections and experienced positive trending on gross charge-off balances for the twelve months ended March 31, 2021.
In accordance with our policies and procedures, certain borrowers qualify for, and the Company offers, one-month principal payment deferrals on Contracts and Direct Loans. Due to COVID-19, the Company allowed an additional deferment during fiscal year 2021, as a result the number of deferments increased at the beginning of the pandemic. For the years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 the Company experienced an average monthly number of deferments of 255 and 696, respectively, which would represent approximately 1.0% and 2.6% of total Contracts and Direct
28
Loans, as of March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The number of deferrals is also influenced by portfolio performance, including but not limited to, inflation, credit quality of loans purchased, competition at the time of Contract acquisition, and general economic conditions.
The Company believes the number of one-month principal payments deferrals is now largely consistent with pre-pandemic levels.
However, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic eventually impacts our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows will depend on numerous evolving factors that we are unable to accurately predict at this time. The length and scope of the restrictions imposed by various governments, success of vaccination efforts, and scope and duration of special government benefits to be unemployed, among other factors, will determine the ultimate severity of the COVID-19 impact on our business. It is likely that prolonged periods of difficult market conditions could have material adverse impacts on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Critical Accounting Estimates
A critical accounting estimate is an estimate that: (i) is made in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, (ii) involves a significant level of estimation uncertainty and (iii) has had or is reasonably likely to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
The Company’s critical accounting estimate relates to the allowance for credit losses. It is based on management’s opinion of an amount that is adequate to absorb losses incurred in the existing portfolio. Because of the nature of the customers under the Company’s Contracts and Direct Loan program, the Company considers the establishment of adequate reserves for credit losses to be imperative.
The Company takes into consideration the composition of the portfolio, current economic conditions, the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, historical loan loss experience, delinquency, non-performing assets, and bankrupt accounts when determining management’s estimate of probable credit losses and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Management utilizes significant judgment in determining probable incurred losses and in identifying and evaluating qualitative factors. This approach aligns with the Company’s lending policies and underwriting standards. If the allowance for credit losses is determined to be inadequate, then an additional charge to the provision is recorded to maintain adequate reserves based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in the loan portfolio. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, the Company made a change in the accounting estimate and began using a trailing twelve-month net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables, and applying this percentage to ending finance receivables to estimate future probable credit losses. This approach better reflects the current trends of incurred losses within the portfolio and more closely aligns the allowance for credit losses with the portfolio’s performance indicators. Prior to the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, the Company used a trailing six-month net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables, annualized, and applied this percentage to ending finance receivables to estimate future probable losses for purposes of determining the allowance for credit losses. Using the prior methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses would have resulted in higher provision expense of approximately $1.7 million. Management believes that estimating the allowance for credit losses using the trailing twelve-month charge-off analysis more accurately reflects portfolio performance adjusted for seasonality and encompasses historical collection practices. Under the current methodology the management continues to evaluate qualitative factors to support its allowance for credit losses. The Company examines the impact of macro-economic factors, such as year-over-year inflation, and changes in the value of underlying collateral and as a result incorporated an additional $0.9 million as a qualitative component amount to its current estimate of adequate reserves.
Contracts are purchased from many different dealers and are all purchased on an individual Contract-by-Contract basis. Individual Contract pricing is determined by the automobile dealerships and is generally the lesser of the applicable state maximum interest rate, if any, or the maximum interest rate which the customer will accept. In most markets, competitive forces will drive down Contract rates from the maximum rate to a level where an individual
29
competitor is willing to buy an individual Contract. The Company generally purchases Contracts on an individual basis.
The Company utilizes the branch model, which allows for Contract purchasing to be done at the branch level. The Company has detailed underwriting guidelines it utilizes to determine which Contracts to purchase. These guidelines are specific and are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Contracts that the Company purchases have common risk characteristics. The Company utilizes its District Managers to evaluate their respective branch locations for adherence to these underwriting guidelines, as well as approve underwriting exceptions. Any Contract that does not meet the Company’s underwriting guidelines can be submitted by a branch manager for approval from the Company’s District Managers or senior management.
Fiscal 2022 Compared to Fiscal 2021
Interest and Fee Income on Finance Receivables
Interest and fee income on finance receivables, predominantly finance charge income, decreased to $49.8 million in fiscal 2022 as compared to $54.2 million in fiscal 2021. The average finance receivables totaled $178.7 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, a decrease of 10.2% from $199.1 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. Purchasing volume increased to $85.8 million in fiscal 2022 from $74.0 million in fiscal 2021. Purchasing volume increased from fiscal 2021 primarily as a result of our focus on training, developing, retaining good talent, while continuing to apply disciplined underwriting and risk-based pricing.
Competition continued to affect the Company’s ability to acquire Contracts at desired yields. The average APR on new Contract purchases was 23.1% for the fiscal year 2022 and 23.4% for the fiscal year 2021. Concurrently, the dealer discount on new Contract purchases decreased from 7.5% for fiscal year 2021 to 6.9% for fiscal year 2022, primarily as a result of competitive pressures. Overall, the Company maintains its strategy focused on risk-based pricing (rate, yield, advance, term, etc.) and a commitment to the underwriting discipline required for optimal portfolio performance.
The gross portfolio yield increased to 27.9% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 as compared to 27.2% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The gross portfolio yield increased primarily because the percentage decrease in average finance receivables exceeded the percentage decrease in interest and fee income on finance receivables.
The net portfolio yield increased to 21.5% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 from 20.6% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The net portfolio yield increased primarily due to a decrease in the provision for credit losses as a percentage of finance receivables, as described under “Analysis of Credit Losses” below (although the provision for credit losses increased in absolute terms). Additionally, the Company recorded lower interest expenses for the fiscal year 2022, which also increased net portfolio yield.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased to $34.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 compared to $31.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 as a result of increases across expense accounts, including but not limited to, professional/consulting fees, marketing, rent, and other identified expenses as a result of expansion efforts into new markets, the opening and staffing of our second corporate location, and a re-focusing on training and development of staff.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased to $5.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, as compared to $6.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, due to a decrease in average outstanding debt and lower interest rate. During third quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 the Company recognized an acceleration of unamortized debt issuance costs (non-cash interest expense) related to the extinguishment of the ARES credit facility in the amount of $1.9 million as interest expense within the Consolidated Statements of Income. The average outstanding debt during the year ended March 31, 2022 decreased to $67.7 million from $107.6 million during the year ended March 31,
30
2021. The following table summarizes the Company’s average cost of borrowed funds for the fiscal years ended March 31:
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Variable interest under the line of credit and credit |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
Credit spread under the line of credit and credit |
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
Average cost of borrowed funds |
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
5.56 |
% |
Analysis of Credit Losses
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the changes in the allowance for credit losses on Contracts and Direct Loans for the fiscal years ended March 31:
|
|
For the year ended March 31, 2022 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Indirect |
|
|
Direct |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
6,001 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
6,154 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
5,965 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(13,515 |
) |
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
(14,495 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
1,961 |
|
|
$ |
988 |
|
|
$ |
2,949 |
|
|
|
For the year ended March 31, 2021 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Indirect |
|
|
Direct |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
10,433 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
11,162 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
7,250 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,250 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(17,141 |
) |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
(17,823 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
5,459 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
6,001 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
6,154 |
|
The Company takes into consideration the composition of the portfolio, current economic conditions, the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, historical loan loss experience, delinquency, non-performing assets, and bankrupt accounts when determining management’s estimate of probable credit losses and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Management utilizes significant judgment in determining probable incurred losses and in identifying and evaluating qualitative factors. This approach aligns with the Company’s lending policies and underwriting standards. If the allowance for credit losses is determined to be inadequate, then an additional charge to the provision is recorded to maintain adequate reserves based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in the loan portfolio. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, the Company made a change in the accounting estimate and began using a trailing twelve-month net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables, and applying this percentage to ending finance receivables to estimate future probable credit losses. This approach better reflects the current trends of incurred losses within the portfolio and more closely aligns the allowance for credit losses with the portfolio’s performance indicators. Prior to the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, the Company used a trailing six-month net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables, annualized, and applied this percentage to ending finance receivables to estimate future probable losses for purposes of determining the allowance for credit losses. Using the prior methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses would have resulted in higher provision expense of approximately $1.7 million. Management believes that estimating the allowance for credit losses using the trailing twelve-month charge-off analysis more accurately reflects portfolio performance adjusted for seasonality and encompasses historical collection practices. Under the current methodology the management continues to evaluate qualitative factors to support its allowance for credit losses. The Company examines the impact of macro-economic factors, such as
31
year-over-year inflation, and changes in the value of underlying collateral and as a result incorporated an additional $0.9 million as a qualitative component amount to its current estimate of adequate reserves.
The Company defines non-performing assets as accounts that are contractually delinquent for 60 or more days past due or Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts. For these accounts, the accrual of interest income is suspended, and any previously accrued interest is reversed. Upon notification of a bankruptcy, an account is monitored for collection with other Chapter 13 accounts. In the event the debtors’ balance is reduced by the bankruptcy court, the Company will record a loss equal to the amount of principal balance reduction. The remaining balance will be reduced as payments are received by the bankruptcy court. In the event an account is dismissed from bankruptcy, the Company will decide based on several factors, whether to begin repossession proceedings or allow the customer to begin making regularly scheduled payments.
The Company defines a Chapter 13 bankruptcy account as a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”). The Company records a specific reserve for Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts which is considered a qualitative reserve to the allowance for credit losses. The Company records the reserve based on the expected collectability of the principal balance of the Chapter 13 Bankruptcy and the specific reserve recorded as of March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021 was $138,000 and $68,000, respectively.
The provision for credit losses decreased to $6.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 from $7.3 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, due to decrease in net charge-off percentage. The Company’s allowance for credit losses also incorporates recent trends such as delinquency, non-performing assets, and bankruptcy. The Company believes that this approach reflects the current trends of incurred losses within the portfolio and better aligns the allowance for credit losses with the portfolio’s performance indicators.
Net charge-offs decreased to 5.1% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 from 6.2% for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, primarily resulting from the Company‘s active management of the portfolio. (See note 5 in the Portfolio Summary table in the “Introduction” above for the definition of net charge-off percentage.)
The delinquency percentage for Contracts more than thirty days past due, excluding Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts, as of March 31, 2022 was 7.3%, an increase from 5.7% as of March 31, 2021. The delinquency percentage for Direct Loans more than thirty days past due, excluding Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts, as of March 31, 2022 was 3.6%, an increase from 3.2% as of March 31, 2021. The delinquency percentage for both Contracts and Direct Loans increased as enhanced unemployment benefits and stimulus programs came to an end.
In accordance with Company policies and procedures, certain borrowers qualify for, and the Company offers, one-month principal payment deferrals on Contracts and Direct Loans. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021 the Company granted deferrals to approximately 11.8% and 31.2%, respectively, of total Contracts and Direct Loans. The decrease in the total number of deferrals in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 was primarily the result of a spike in April 30, 2021, and a change in company policy during fiscal 2021 that allowed an additional deferment. The number of deferrals is also influenced by portfolio performance, including but not limited to, inflation, credit quality of loans purchased, competition at the time of Contract acquisition, and general economic conditions. For further information on deferrals, please see the disclosure under “COVID-19” above.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded a tax expense of approximately $2.6 million during fiscal 2021 compared to a tax expenses of approximately $1.0 million during fiscal 2022. The Company’s effective tax rate in fiscal 2021 was 23.7% compared to 25.9% in fiscal 2022. For further discussion regarding income taxes see “Note 7 – Income Taxes”.
32
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s cash flows are summarized as follows:
|
|
Fiscal Year ended March 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating activities |
|
$ |
3,487 |
|
|
$ |
14,623 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
29,861 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
(35,551 |
) |
|
|
(36,191 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
$ |
(28,202 |
) |
|
$ |
8,293 |
|
Our major source of liquidity and capital is cash generated from our ongoing operations and our borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility.
We believe that our current cash balance, together with the future cash generated from operations and our borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility, will be sufficient to satisfy our requirements and plans for cash for the next 12 months. We also believe that future cash generated from operations and our borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility, will be sufficient to satisfy our requirements and plans for cash beyond the next 12 months. Our access to, and the availability of, financing on acceptable terms in the future will be affected by many factors including overall liquidity in the capital or credit markets, the state of the economy and our credit strength as viewed by potential lenders. We cannot provide assurances that we will have future access to the capital or credit markets on acceptable terms.
On November 5, 2021, NFI and Nicholas Data Services, Inc., a Florida corporation (“NDS” and collectively with NFI, the “Borrowers”), two wholly-owned subsidiaries of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) pursuant to a loan and security agreement by and among the Borrowers, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as agent, and the lenders that are party thereto (the “Credit Agreement”). The prior credit facility (the "Ares Credit Facility") pursuant to a credit agreement among the Company’s subsidiary NF Funding I, LLC, Ares Agent Services, L.P. and the lenders party thereto was paid off in connection with entering into the Credit Facility.
Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the lenders agreed to extend to the Borrowers a line of credit of up to $175,000,000. The availability of funds under the Credit Facility is generally limited to an advance rate of between 80% and 85% of the value of eligible receivables, and outstanding advances under the Credit Facility will accrue interest at a rate equal to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) plus 2.25%. The commitment period for advances under the Credit Facility is three years (the expiration of that time period, the “Maturity Date”).
Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Borrowers granted a security interest in substantially all of their assets as collateral for their obligations under the Credit Facility. Furthermore, pursuant to a separate collateral pledge agreement, NDS pledged its equity interest in NFI as additional collateral.
The Credit Agreement and the other loan documents contain customary events of default and negative covenants, including but not limited to those governing indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes, investments, and sales of assets. Such documents also restrict the Company’s ability to make distributions to its shareholders, enter into certain fundamental transactions or make bulk purchases of receivables. If an event of default occurs, the lenders could increase borrowing costs, restrict the Borrowers’ ability to obtain additional advances under the Credit Facility, accelerate all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility, enforce their interest against collateral pledged under the Credit Facility or enforce such other rights and remedies as they have under the loan documents or applicable law as secured lenders.
If the lenders terminate the Credit Facility following the occurrence of an event of default under the loan documents, or the Borrowers prepay the loan and terminate the Credit Facility prior to the Maturity Date of November 5, 2024, then the Borrowers are obligated to pay a termination or prepayment fee in an amount equal to a
33
percentage of $175,000,000, calculated as 2% if the termination or prepayment occurs during year one, 1% if the termination or repayment occurs during year two, and 0.5% if the termination or prepayment occurs thereafter.
On May 27, 2020, the Company obtained a loan in the amount of $3,243,900 from a bank in connection with the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP Loan”). Pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program, all or a portion of the PPP Loan may be forgiven if the Company uses the proceeds of the PPP Loan for its payroll costs and other expenses in accordance with the requirements of the Paycheck Protection Program. The Company used the proceeds of the PPP Loan for payroll costs and other covered expenses and sought full forgiveness of the PPP Loan. The Company submitted a forgiveness application to Fifth Third Bank, the lender, on December 7, 2020 and submitted supplemental documentation on January 16, 2021. On December 27, 2021 SBA informed the Company that no forgiveness was granted. The Company filed an appeal with SBA on January 5, 2022. On May 6, 2022 the Office of Hearing and Appeals SBA (OHA) rendered a decision to deny the appeal. The Company subsequently repaid the outstanding principal of $3,243,900 plus accrued and unpaid interest of $64,518 on May 23, 2022.
The Company is currently evaluating its capital allocation goals and may in the future decide to change its mix of capital resources in an effort to achieve a higher dollar value of receivables for every dollar of equity capital invested. To do so, the Company may, if so agreed with its lender, distribute future excess profits generated at its U.S. subsidiaries to the Company, or reinvest excess equity capital into its U.S. subsidiaries when opportunities warrant. In addition, the Company may determine to continue its share repurchases at a higher volume than previously and/or acquire businesses or assets that are related or unrelated to its current business, including securities in publicly-held companies. However, the Company is not limited to these alternatives. In addition, the Company may determine not to pursue these or any other alternatives to change its capital allocation, for example because it determines that such path is not prudent in light of legal and tax requirements applying to the Company as a British Columbia company listed in the United States with primarily United States shareholders and, through its U.S. subsidiaries, exclusively United States operations.
Impact of Inflation
The Company is affected by inflation primarily through increased operating costs and expenses including increases in interest rates. Inflationary pressures on operating costs and expenses historically have been largely offset by the Company’s continued emphasis on stringent operating and cost controls, although no assurances can be given regarding the Company’s ability to offset the effects of inflation in the future. Management believes the rise in inflation can impact the subprime borrower due to rising cost of housing, consumer goods, gas prices, etc. and believes it could have an impact on the performance and collectability of the portfolio.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Not applicable.
34
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The following financial statements are filed as part of this Report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 49) |
|
36 |
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
42 |
35
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2022, and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2022, and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
36
Allowance for credit losses
As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s allowance for credit losses was $2.9 million at March 31, 2022. The Company calculates the allowance using their trailing twelve-month net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables and applies this calculated percentage to ending finance receivables and adjusts for qualitative factors, as necessary, such as the composition of its portfolio, current economic conditions, estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, delinquency, non-performing assets, and bankrupt accounts. Management utilizes significant judgment in determining probable incurred losses and in identifying and evaluating qualitative factors.
We identified the Company’s method of calculating the allowance for credit losses, specifically the reasonableness of the qualitative factors utilized and the use of the trailing twelve-month net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables and applying this calculated percentage to ending finance receivables, as a critical audit matter, as auditing management’s assumptions for the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses required a high degree of subjectivity, auditor judgment and increased extent of audit effort in evaluating these assumptions.
Our audit procedures related to the Company’s allowance for credit losses included the following procedures, among others:
/s/ RSM US LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2018.
Raleigh, North Carolina
June 24, 2022
37
Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
|
|
March 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
22,022 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,955 |
|
Finance receivables, net |
|
|
168,600 |
|
|
|
170,318 |
|
Repossessed assets |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
Operating lease right-of-use assets |
|
|
4,277 |
|
|
|
3,392 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
2,283 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
183,570 |
|
|
$ |
212,438 |
|
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Credit facility, net of debt issuance costs |
|
$ |
54,813 |
|
|
$ |
86,154 |
|
Note payable |
|
|
3,244 |
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
Net long-term debt |
|
|
58,057 |
|
|
|
89,398 |
|
Operating lease liabilities |
|
|
4,410 |
|
|
|
3,367 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
4,717 |
|
|
|
4,451 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
67,184 |
|
|
|
97,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock, no par: 5,000 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common stock, no par: 50,000 shares authorized; 12,673 and 12,653 |
|
|
35,292 |
|
|
|
35,064 |
|
Treasury stock: 5,127 and 4,945 common shares, at cost, respectively |
|
|
(74,405 |
) |
|
|
(72,343 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
155,499 |
|
|
|
152,501 |
|
Total shareholders’ equity |
|
|
116,386 |
|
|
|
115,222 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
|
$ |
183,570 |
|
|
$ |
212,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
The following table represents the assets and liabilities of our consolidated variable interest entity as of March 31: |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assets |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Restricted cash |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
10,955 |
|
Finance receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
150,706 |
|
|
Repossessed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
162,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Credit facility, net of debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
$ |
86,154 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
86,559 |
|
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
38
Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Fiscal Year ended March 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest and fee income on finance receivables |
|
$ |
49,779 |
|
|
$ |
54,211 |
|
Realized gain on equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
49,779 |
|
|
|
56,020 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Marketing |
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
20,050 |
|
|
|
19,083 |
|
Administrative |
|
|
12,120 |
|
|
|
11,248 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
5,965 |
|
|
|
7,250 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
5,980 |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
45,733 |
|
|
|
45,074 |
|
Operating income before income taxes |
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
10,946 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,998 |
|
|
$ |
8,351 |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
.39 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.39 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
39
Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands)
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Shareholders' |
|
|||||
Balance at March 31, 2020 |
|
|
7,806 |
|
|
$ |
34,867 |
|
|
$ |
(71,438 |
) |
|
$ |
144,150 |
|
|
$ |
107,579 |
|
Net income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,351 |
|
|
|
8,351 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock awards |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Treasury stock repurchases |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2021 |
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
$ |
35,064 |
|
|
$ |
(72,343 |
) |
|
$ |
152,501 |
|
|
$ |
115,222 |
|
Net income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock awards |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Treasury stock repurchases |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2022 |
|
|
7,546 |
|
|
$ |
35,292 |
|
|
$ |
(74,405 |
) |
|
$ |
155,499 |
|
|
$ |
116,386 |
|
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
40
Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
|
|
Fiscal Year ended March 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
2,998 |
|
|
$ |
8,351 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
2,176 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Amortization of operating of lease right-of-use assets |
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Purchases of equity investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4,142 |
) |
Proceeds from equity investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,951 |
|
Realized gains on equity investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,809 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
5,965 |
|
|
|
7,250 |
|
Amortization of dealer discounts |
|
|
(6,411 |
) |
|
|
(6,421 |
) |
Amortization of insurance and fee commissions |
|
|
(2,821 |
) |
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
Accretion of purchase price discount |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(551 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
Principal reduction on operating lease liabilities |
|
|
(1,591 |
) |
|
|
(1,193 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Repossessed assets |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
879 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
4,245 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
3,487 |
|
|
|
14,403 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchase and origination of finance receivables |
|
|
(114,544 |
) |
|
|
(88,173 |
) |
Principal payments received |
|
|
119,711 |
|
|
|
118,849 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,312 |
) |
|
|
(615 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
30,081 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Repayments on credit facilities |
|
|
(105,830 |
) |
|
|
(38,530 |
) |
Proceeds from the credit facilities |
|
|
72,530 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds from PPP Loan |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Repurchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
(905 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(35,551 |
) |
|
|
(36,191 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
(28,202 |
) |
|
|
8,293 |
|
Cash and restricted cash, beginning of year |
|
|
32,977 |
|
|
|
24,684 |
|
Cash and restricted cash, end of year |
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
32,977 |
|
Supplemental Disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest paid, including debt originations cost, during the year |
|
$ |
3,415 |
|
|
$ |
5,714 |
|
Income taxes paid during the year |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
Leased assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities |
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
The following table reconciles cash and restricted cash from the Consolidated Balance Sheets to the statements above: |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Fiscal Year ended March 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
22,022 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,955 |
|
Total cash and restricted cash |
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
32,977 |
|
See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
41
Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Nicholas Financial, Inc. (“Nicholas Financial – Canada”) is a Canadian holding company incorporated under the laws of British Columbia with two wholly owned United States subsidiaries, Nicholas Data Services, Inc. (“NDS”) and Nicholas Financial, Inc. (“NFI”). NDS historically was engaged in supporting and updating industry-specific computer application software for small businesses located primarily in the Southeastern United States. NDS has ceased its operations; however, it continues as the interim holding company for Nicholas Financial. NFI is a specialized consumer finance company engaged primarily in acquiring and servicing automobile finance installment contracts (“Contracts”) for purchases of used and new automobiles and light trucks. NFI also offers direct consumer loans (“Direct Loans”) and sells consumer-finance related products. In addition, NF Funding I, LLC (“NF Funding I”), is a wholly-owned, special purpose financing subsidiary of NFI. All three companies are based in Florida, U.S.A. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars and are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Canadian income taxes are not reported as they are immaterial.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Nicholas Financial – Canada and its wholly owned subsidiaries, NDS, NFI, and NF Funding I, collectively referred to as the “Company”. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Segment Reporting
The Company reports operating segments in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280, Segment Reporting. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assesses performance. FASB ASC Topic 280 requires that a public enterprise report a measure of segment profit or loss, certain specific revenue and expense items, segment assets, information about the way the operating segments where determined and other items.
The Company has one reportable segment, which is the consumer finance company.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for credit losses on finance receivables.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes cash and cash equivalents for which the Company’s ability to withdraw funds is contractually limited. The Company’s restricted cash consist of cash restricted for debt servicing of the Company’s variable interest entity.
42
Finance Receivables
Finance receivables are recorded at cost, net of unearned dealer discounts, unearned insurance and commissions (see “Revenue Recognition”), and the allowance for credit losses (See Note 3).
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company takes into consideration the composition of the portfolio, current economic conditions, the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, historical loan loss experience, delinquency, non-performing assets, and bankrupt accounts when determining management’s estimate of probable credit losses and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Management utilizes significant judgment in determining probable incurred losses and in identifying and evaluating qualitative factors. This approach aligns with the Company’s lending policies and underwriting standards. If the allowance for credit losses is determined to be inadequate, then an additional charge to the provision is recorded to maintain adequate reserves based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in the loan portfolio.
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, the Company made a change in the accounting estimate and began using a trailing twelve-month net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables, and applying this percentage to ending finance receivables to estimate future probable credit losses. This approach better reflects the current trends of incurred losses within the portfolio and more closely aligns the allowance for credit losses with the portfolio’s performance indicators. Prior to the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, the Company used a trailing six-month net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables, annualized, and applied this percentage to ending finance receivables to estimate future probable losses for purposes of determining the allowance for credit losses. Using the prior methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses would have resulted in higher provision expense of approximately $1.7 million. Management believes that estimating the allowance for credit losses using the trailing twelve-month charge-off analysis more accurately reflects portfolio performance adjusted for seasonality and encompasses historical collection practices. Under the current methodology the management continues to evaluate qualitative factors to support its allowance for credit losses. The Company examines the impact of macro-economic factors, such as year-over-year inflation, and changes in the value of underlying collateral and as a result incorporated an additional $0.9 million as a qualitative component amount to its current estimate of adequate reserves.
Repossessed Assets
Repossessed assets are stated at net realizable value and consist primarily of automobiles that have been repossessed by the Company and are awaiting final disposition. Most costs associated with repossession, transport, and auction preparation expenses are reported under operating expenses in the period in which they are incurred.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
Automobiles |
3 years |
Equipment |
5 years |
Furniture and fixtures |
7 years |
Software |
7 years |
Leasehold improvements |
Lesser of lease term or useful life (generally 6 - 7 years) |
43
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases along with operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, if any. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rate is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company recognizes tax benefits from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from any such position would be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is the Company’s policy to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any uncertain tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. There were no uncertain tax positions as of March 31, 2022 or 2021.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions, and Canada. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal and state tax examinations for fiscal years prior to 2017.
We are subject to taxation at the federal, state, and local levels in the United States and Canada. On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”). The changes included in TCJA are broad and complex. The final transition impacts of TCJA may differ from the estimates provided elsewhere in this Annual Report, possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations of TCJA, any legislative action to address questions that arise because of TCJA, any changes in accounting standards for income taxes or related interpretations in response to TCJA, or any updates or changes to estimates the Company has utilized to calculate the transition impacts, including impacts from changes to current year earnings estimates. The estimated impact of the new law is based on management’s current knowledge and assumptions and recognized impacts could be materially different from current estimates.
The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period that includes the enactment date.
Revenue Recognition
Interest income on finance receivables is recognized using the interest method. Accrual of interest income on finance receivables is suspended when a loan is contractually delinquent for 61 days or more, or the collateral is repossessed, whichever is earlier. The Company reverses the accrual of interest income when the loan is contractually delinquent 61 days or more.
The Company defines a non-performing asset as one that is 60 or more days past due, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy account, or a Chapter 13 bankruptcy account that has not been confirmed by the courts, for which the accrual of interest income is suspended. Upon receiving notice that a Chapter 13 bankruptcy trustee’s plan (BK13) was not confirmed, the account is immediately charged-off. Upon notification of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, an account is monitored for collectability. In the event the debtors’ balance is reduced by the bankruptcy court, the Company records a loss equal to the amount of principal balance reduction. The remaining balance is reduced as payments are received. In the event an account is dismissed from bankruptcy, the Company will decide whether to begin repossession proceedings or to allow the customer to make regularly scheduled payments. (see Note 3).
A dealer discount represents the difference between the finance receivable of a Contract, and the amount of money the Company actually pays for the Contract. The discount negotiated by the Company is a function of the lender, the wholesale value of the vehicle, and competition in any given market. In making decisions regarding the purchase of a particular Contract, the Company considers the following factors related to the borrower: place and length of
44
residence; current and prior job status; history in making installment payments for automobiles; current income; and credit history. In addition, the Company examines its prior experience with Contracts purchased from the dealer from which the Company is purchasing the Contract, and the value of the automobile in relation to the purchase price and the term of the Contract. The dealer discount is amortized as an adjustment to yield using the interest method over the life of the loan. The average dealer discount, as a percent of the amount financed, associated with new volume for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, were 6.9% and 7.5%, respectively.
Unearned insurance and fee commissions consist primarily of commissions received from the sale of ancillary products. These products include automobile warranties, roadside assistance programs, accident and health insurance, credit life insurance, involuntary unemployment insurance, and forced placed automobile insurance. These commissions are amortized over the life of the Contract using the interest method.
Origination & processing fees are an upfront fee charged by the Company to process a new loan application. These are recognized over the life of the loan using the interest method.
NSF and late fees are recognized when collected.
Earnings Per Share
The Company has granted stock compensation awards with nonforfeitable dividend rights which are considered participating securities. Earnings per share is calculated using the two-class method, as such awards are more dilutive under this method than the treasury stock method. Ordinarily, basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income allocated to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, which excludes the participating securities. Dilutive earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income allocated to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period which includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares from stock compensation awards. For the years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, Company experienced net income. Income per share has been computed based on the following weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
Fiscal Year ended March 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income per consolidated statements of income |
|
$ |
2,998 |
|
|
$ |
8,351 |
|
Percentage allocated to shareholders * |
|
|
99.5 |
% |
|
|
99.5 |
% |
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share |
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
8,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator for Basic earnings per share - weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
7,572 |
|
|
|
7,626 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share |
|
|
7,572 |
|
|
|
7,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Per share income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
*Basic weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
7,572 |
|
|
|
7,626 |
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding and unvested restricted stock units expected to vest |
|
|
7,612 |
|
|
|
7,666 |
|
Percentage allocated to shareholders |
|
|
99.5 |
% |
|
|
99.5 |
% |
45
Share-Based Payments
The grant date fair value of share awards is recognized in earnings over the requisite service period (presumptively, the vesting period), net of estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates the fair value of option awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The risk-free interest rate is based upon a U.S. Treasury instrument with a life that is similar to the expected term of the options. Expected volatility is based upon the historical volatility for the previous period equal to the expected term of the options. The expected term is based upon the average life of previously issued options. The expected dividend yield is based upon the yield expected on date of grant to occur over the term of the option.
The fair value of non-vested restricted shares and performance units are measured at the market price of a share on a grant date. Restricted shares have a three-year service period. Performance units include a performance period (generally ending at the end of the fiscal year in which the units were granted) followed by a two-year service period. At the end of the performance period, these units effectively become restricted shares for the remaining two-year service period at which time they become vested.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures specific assets and liabilities at fair value, which is an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When applicable, the Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability under a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs about which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions (see Note 6).
Financial Instruments and Concentrations
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, finance receivables (accrued interest receivable is a part of finance receivables), repossessed assets, note payable, and a Credit Facility. Financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk are primarily finance receivables and cash.
For the year ended, March 31, 2022, the Company operated in 18 states through 47 branch locations. Of the aggregate finance receivables as of March 31, 2022, Florida represented 23%, Ohio represented 14%, Georgia represented 12%, and North Carolina represented 9%. Each of Kentucky, Missouri, and South Carolina represented 6%, and Indiana represented 5%. Of the remaining states, no one state represented more than 5% of the total finance receivables. The Company provides credit during the normal course of business and performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers.
The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses which, when realized, have been within the range of management’s expectations. The Company perfects a primary security interest in all vehicles financed as a form of collateral.
The combined account balances the Company maintains at financial institutions typically exceed federally insured limits, and there is a concentration of credit risk related to accounts on deposit in excess of federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes this risk of loss is not significant.
Variable Interest Entity
In March 2019, the Company entered into a senior secured credit facility collateralized by consumer finance receivables by transferring the receivables into a bankruptcy-remote variable interest entity (VIE). Under the terms of the transaction, all cash collections and other cash proceeds of the customer receivables went first to the servicer and the holders of the asset-backed notes, and then to the residual equity holder. The Company retained the servicing of the portfolio and received a monthly fee of 2.5% (annualized) based on the outstanding balance of the financed receivables, and the Company held all of the residual equity. In addition, the Company, rather than the
46
VIE, retained certain credit insurance income together with certain recoveries related to credit insurance and on charge-offs of the financed receivables, which would continue to be reflected as a reduction of net charge-offs on a consolidated basis for as long as the Company consolidated the VIE.
On November 5, 2021 the Company entered into new senior secured credit facility (the "Credit Facility") pursuant to a loan and security agreement by and among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as agent, and the lenders that are party thereto (the “Credit Agreement”). The Company granted a security interest in substantially all assets as collateral for their obligations under the Credit Facility. The prior credit facility (the "Ares Credit Facility") pursuant to a credit agreement among the Company’s subsidiary NF Funding I, LLC, Ares Agent Services, L.P. and the lenders party thereto was paid off in connection with entering into the Credit Facility, therefore the VIE assets and liabilities are zero as of March 31, 2022.
Reclassifications
Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net loss or shareholders’ equity.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the FASB issued the ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Among other things, the amendments in this ASU require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. The ASU also requires additional disclosures related to estimates and judgments used to measure all expected credit losses. The new guidance was originally effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. Recently, the FASB voted to delay the implementation date for this accounting standard, for smaller reporting companies, the new effective date is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on the consolidated financial statements and is collecting and analyzing data that will be needed to produce historical inputs into any models created as a result of adopting this ASU. At this time, the Company believes the adoption of this ASU will likely have a material effect and is expected to increase the overall allowance for credit losses.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitating of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions in which the reference LIBOR or another reference rate is expected to be discontinued as a result of the Reference Rate Reform. This ASU is intended to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting. The new guidance was effective immediately and through December 31, 2022. At this time, the Company believes that the adoption of this ASU is immaterial.
In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-02, Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) and Vintage Disclosures as an update to Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326). The amendments in this ASU eliminate the TDR recognition and measurement guidance and, instead, require that an entity evaluate (consistent with the accounting for other loan modifications) whether the modification represents a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan. The amendments enhance existing disclosure requirements and introduce new requirements related to certain modifications of receivables made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. In addition, ASU 2022-02 requires that an entity disclose current-period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investments in leases within the scope of Subtopic 326-20, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses—Measured at Amortized Cost. The amendments in ASU 2022-02 will be effective for the Company with its adoption of ASU 2016-13.
47
The Company does not believe there are any other recently issued accounting standards that have not yet been adopted that will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
3. Finance Receivables
Finance receivables consist of Contracts and Direct Loans, each of which comprise a portfolio segment. Each portfolio segment consists of smaller balance homogeneous loans which are collectively evaluated for impairment.
The Company purchases individual Contracts from used and new automobile dealers in its markets. There is no relationship between the Company and the dealer with respect to a given Contract once the assignment of that Contract is complete. The dealer has no vested interest in the performance of any Contract the Company purchases. The Company’s charge off policy is 121 days past due. In addition, Chapter 13 Bankruptcies, once the Company is notified of such, is notated on the customer's account of the bankruptcy status. When the Company receives notice that a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy plan is not confirmed by the courts or the loan is 121 days past due, the loan is charged off. This policy is in line with industry standards, considering the sub-prime nature of our customers. In the event of repossession, the charge-off will occur after standard collection practices by the Company, as determined by the residency state of a customer. This practice is consistent with the sub-prime industry.
Contracts and Direct Loans included in finance receivables are detailed as follows as of fiscal years ended March 31:
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Finance receivables |
|
$ |
178,786 |
|
|
$ |
184,237 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
2,315 |
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
Unearned dealer discounts |
|
|
(6,894 |
) |
|
|
(7,290 |
) |
Unearned purchase price discounts |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
Unearned insurance and fee commissions |
|
|
(2,446 |
) |
|
|
(2,396 |
) |
Finance receivables, net of unearned |
|
|
171,549 |
|
|
|
176,472 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(2,949 |
) |
|
|
(6,154 |
) |
Finance receivables, net |
|
$ |
168,600 |
|
|
$ |
170,318 |
|
Contracts
The Company purchases Contracts from automobile dealers at a negotiated price that is less than the original principal amount being financed by the purchaser of the automobile. The Contracts are predominantly for used vehicles. As of March 31, 2022, the average model year of vehicles collateralizing the portfolio was a 2012 vehicle. The terms of the Contracts range from 12 to 84 months and bear an average contractual interest rate of 22.9% and 23.4% as of March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Direct Loans
Direct Loans are typically for amounts ranging from $1,000 to $15,000 and are generally secured by a lien on an automobile, watercraft or other permissible tangible personal property. The majority of Direct Loans are originated with current or former customers under the Company’s automobile financing program. The typical Direct Loan represents a better credit risk than Contracts due to the customer’s historical payment history with the Company; however, the underlying collateral is less valuable. In deciding whether or not to make a loan, the Company considers the individual’s credit history, job stability, income, and impressions created during a personal interview with a Company loan officer. Additionally, because most of the Direct Loans made by the Company to date have been made to borrowers under Contracts previously purchased by the Company, the payment history of the borrower under the Contract is a significant factor in making the loan decision. Direct Loans constituted approximately 14% of the aggregate principal amount of the Company’s loan portfolio as of March 31, 2022, and 8% of the aggregate principal amount of the Company’s loan portfolio as of March 31, 2021. The terms of the Direct Loans range from 6 to 72 months and bear an average contractual interest rate of 29.8% and 29.7% as of March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
48
Allowance for Credit Losses
The following presents the activity in our allowance for credit losses:
|
|
For the year ended March 31, 2022 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Indirect |
|
|
Direct |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
6,001 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
6,154 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
5,965 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(13,515 |
) |
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
(14,495 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
1,961 |
|
|
$ |
988 |
|
|
$ |
2,949 |
|
|
|
For the year ended March 31, 2021 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Indirect |
|
|
Direct |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
10,433 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
11,162 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
7,250 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,250 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(17,141 |
) |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
(17,823 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
5,459 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
6,001 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
6,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A performing account is defined as an account that is less than 60 days past due. The Company defines an automobile contract as delinquent when more than 25% of payments contractually due by a certain date has not been paid by the immediately following due date, which date may have been extended within limits specified in the servicing agreements or as a result of a deferral. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due, as extended where applicable.
In certain circumstances, the Company will grant obligors one-month payment extensions. The only modification of terms in those circumstances is to advance the obligor’s next due date by one month and extend the maturity date of the receivable. There are no other concessions, such as a reduction in interest rate, forgiveness of principal or of accrued interest. Accordingly, the Company considers such extensions to be insignificant delays in payments rather than troubled debt restructurings.
A non-performing account is defined as an account that is contractually delinquent for 60 days or more or is a Chapter 13 bankruptcy account, and the accrual of interest income is suspended. The Company’s charge-off policy for contractually delinquent is 121 days. The Company’s charge-off policy aligns with practices within the subprime auto financing segment. See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for more details.
In the event an account is dismissed from bankruptcy, the Company will decide, based on several factors, to begin repossession proceedings or to allow the customer to begin making regularly scheduled payments.
The following table is an assessment of the credit quality by creditworthiness as of March 31:
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Direct |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Direct |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||
Performing accounts |
|
$ |
149,976 |
|
|
$ |
24,102 |
|
|
$ |
174,078 |
|
|
$ |
166,828 |
|
|
$ |
13,717 |
|
|
$ |
180,545 |
|
Non-performing accounts |
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
|
3,367 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
Total |
|
|
154,143 |
|
|
|
24,376 |
|
|
|
178,519 |
|
|
|
170,195 |
|
|
|
13,909 |
|
|
|
184,104 |
|
Chapter 13 bankruptcy |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Finance receivables |
|
$ |
154,397 |
|
|
$ |
24,389 |
|
|
$ |
178,786 |
|
|
$ |
170,318 |
|
|
$ |
13,919 |
|
|
$ |
184,237 |
|
49
The following tables present certain information regarding the delinquency rates experienced by the Company with respect to Contracts and Direct Loans, excluding any Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts:
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Contracts |
|
Balance |
|
|
30 – 59 days |
|
|
60 –89 days |
|
|
90-119 days |
|
|
120+ days |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||
March 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
154,143 |
|
|
$ |
7,097 |
|
|
$ |
2,936 |
|
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
11,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
7.31 |
% |
|
March 31, 2021 |
|
$ |
170,195 |
|
|
$ |
6,289 |
|
|
$ |
2,430 |
|
|
$ |
896 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
9,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
0.53 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
5.67 |
% |
Direct Loans |
|
Balance |
|
|
30 – 59 days |
|
|
60 –89 days |
|
|
90-119 days |
|
|
120+ days |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||
March 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
24,376 |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.49 |
% |
|
|
0.81 |
% |
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
March 31, 2021 |
|
$ |
13,909 |
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
3.20 |
% |
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment as of March 31, 2022 and 2021 is summarized as follows:
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|||
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Automobiles |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
Software |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,236 |
|
|
$ |
2,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Automobiles |
|
$ |
342 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
Software |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,428 |
|
|
$ |
3,569 |
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
5. Credit Facility
Wells Fargo Credit Facility
On November 5, 2021, NFI and Nicholas Data Services, Inc., a Florida corporation (“NDS” and collectively with NFI, the “Borrowers”), two wholly-owned subsidiaries of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) pursuant to a loan and security agreement by and among the Borrowers, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as agent, and the lenders that are party thereto (the “Credit Agreement”). The prior credit facility (the "Ares Credit Facility") pursuant to a credit agreement among the Company’s subsidiary NF Funding I, Ares Agent Services, L.P. and the lenders party thereto was paid off in connection with entering into the Credit Facility. As a result, the Company recognized an acceleration of unamortized debt issuance costs (non-cash interest expense) related to the extinguishment of the ARES credit facility in the amount of $1.9 million as interest expense within the Consolidated Statements of Income.
50
Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the lenders agreed to extend to the Borrowers a line of credit of up to $175,000,000. The availability of funds under the Credit Facility is generally limited to an advance rate of between 80% and 85% of the value of eligible receivables, and outstanding advances under the Credit Facility will accrue interest at a rate equal to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) plus 2.25%. The commitment period for advances under the Credit Facility is three years (the expiration of that time period, the “Maturity Date”).
Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Borrowers granted a security interest in substantially all of the Company's assets as collateral for their obligations under the Credit Facility. Furthermore, pursuant to a separate collateral pledge agreement, NDS pledged its equity interest in NFI as additional collateral.
The Credit Agreement and the other loan documents contain customary events of default and negative covenants, including but not limited to those governing indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes, investments, and sales of assets. If an event of default occurs, the lenders could increase borrowing costs, restrict the Borrowers’ ability to obtain additional advances under the Credit Facility, accelerate all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility, enforce their interest against collateral pledged under the Credit Facility or enforce such other rights and remedies as they have under the loan documents or applicable law as secured lenders.
If the lenders terminate the Credit Facility following the occurrence of an event of default under the loan documents, or the Borrowers prepay the loan and terminate the Credit Facility prior to the Maturity Date, then the Borrowers are obligated to pay a termination or prepayment fee in an amount equal to a percentage of $175,000,000, calculated as 2% if the termination or prepayment occurs during year one, 1% if the termination or repayment occurs during year two, and 0.5% if the termination or prepayment occurs thereafter.
As of March 31, 2022, the Company had aggregate outstanding indebtedness, net of debt issuance costs, under the Credit Facility of $54.8 million, compared to $86.2 million outstanding under the Ares Credit Facility as of March 31, 2021.
Future maturities of debt as of March 31, 2022 are as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
$ |
3,244 |
|
2024 |
|
|
- |
|
2025 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
58,244 |
|
On May 27, 2020, the Company obtained a loan in the amount of $3,243,900 from a bank in connection with the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP Loan”). Pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program, all or a portion of the PPP Loan may be forgiven if the Company uses the proceeds of the PPP Loan for its payroll costs and other expenses in accordance with the requirements of the Paycheck Protection Program. The Company used the proceeds of the PPP Loan for payroll costs and other covered expenses and sought full forgiveness of the PPP Loan. The Company submitted a forgiveness application to Fifth Third Bank, the lender, on December 7, 2020 and submitted supplemental documentation on January 16, 2021. On December 27, 2021 SBA informed the Company that no forgiveness was granted. The Company filed an appeal with SBA on January 5, 2022. On May 6, 2022 the Office of Hearing and Appeals SBA (OHA) rendered a decision to deny the appeal. The Company subsequently repaid the outstanding principal of $3,243,900 plus accrued and unpaid interest of $64,518 on May 23, 2022.
51
6. Fair Value Disclosures
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value
In fiscal year 2021 the Company initiated certain equity investments. The Company defined these equity investments as trading securities for which the changes in fair value were immediately recognized through net income in each quarter, respectively. The Company sold all equity investments as of March 31, 2021, all gains were recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income, for the year ended March 31, 2021.
Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and restricted cash, finance receivables, repossessed assets, and the Credit Facility. For the cash, finance receivables, the credit facility, and note payable, the carrying value approximates fair value.
Based on current market conditions, any new or renewed credit facility would contain pricing that approximates the Company’s current Credit Facility. Based on these market conditions, the fair value of the Credit Facility as of March 31, 2022 was estimated to be equal to the book value. The interest rate for the Credit Facility is a variable rate based on SOFR pricing options. Similarly, the fair value for the note payable as of March 31, 2022 was equal to the book value. The interest rate for the note payable was 1%.
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|||||||||||
Description |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|||||
Cash and restricted cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
March 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
March 31, 2021 |
|
$ |
32,977 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
32,977 |
|
|
$ |
32,977 |
|
Finance receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
March 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
168,600 |
|
|
$ |
168,600 |
|
|
$ |
168,600 |
|
March 31, 2021 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
170,318 |
|
|
$ |
170,318 |
|
|
$ |
170,318 |
|
Repossessed assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
March 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
$ |
658 |
|
March 31, 2021 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
685 |
|
|
$ |
685 |
|
|
$ |
685 |
|
Credit facility: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
March 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
March 31, 2021 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
88,300 |
|
|
$ |
88,300 |
|
|
$ |
88,300 |
|
Note payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
March 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
3,244 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,244 |
|
|
$ |
3,244 |
|
March 31, 2021 |
|
$ |
3,244 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,244 |
|
|
$ |
3,244 |
|
The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. At each reporting period, all assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs are classified as Level 3. Management has determined that this level to be most appropriate for finance receivables, repossessed assets, and the Credit Facility shown in the table above.
Level 2 assets are financial assets and liabilities that do not have regular market pricing, but whose fair value can be determined based on other data values or market pricing. Management has determined that this level to be most appropriate for the credit facility shown in the table above.
Level 1 assets are financial assets that have a regular mark to market mechanism for setting a fair market value. These assets are considered to have readily observable, transparent prices and therefore a reliable, fair market value. Management has determined that this level to be most appropriate for cash, restricted cash, note payable, and equity investments.
52
7. Income Taxes
Income tax expense consists of the following for the years ended March 31:
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Federal |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
969 |
|
State |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total current |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Federal |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
State |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Total deferred |
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
|
$ |
2,595 |
|
The net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes are reflected in deferred income taxes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets consist of the following as of March 31:
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||
Deferred Tax Assets |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Allowance for credit losses not currently deductible |
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
1,647 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
State net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
Right of use liability |
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
Other items |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,755 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Right of use asset |
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
Other items |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
1,385 |
|
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
Income tax expense reflects an effective U.S tax rate, which differs from the corporate tax rate for the following reasons:
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Income tax expense at Federal statutory rate |
|
$ |
855 |
|
|
$ |
2,303 |
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
State income taxes, net of Federal benefit |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Other |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
|
$ |
2,595 |
|
Management assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate whether sufficient future taxable income will be generated to permit use of the existing deferred tax assets. A significant piece of positive evidence evaluated was the cumulative pre-tax income over the three-year period ended March 31, 2022, cumulative projected pre-tax income for the next three years, previously noted. As of March 31, 2022, a valuation allowance was not required. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income are reduced. Generally, state NOL’s begin to expire March 31, 2039.
53
The Company considers the earnings of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries to be indefinitely invested outside Canada on the basis of estimates that future domestic cash generation will be sufficient to meet future domestic cash needs and the Company’s specific plans for reinvestment of those subsidiary earnings. The Company has not recorded a deferred tax liability related to the Canadian income taxes and U.S. withholding taxes on approximately $155.5 million of undistributed earnings of the U.S. subsidiaries indefinitely invested outside Canada. If the Company decided to repatriate the U.S. earnings, it would need to adjust its income tax provision in the period the Company determined that the earnings will no longer be indefinitely invested outside of Canada.
8. Leases
The Company maintains lease agreements related to its branch network and for its corporate headquarters. The branch lease agreements range from to five years and generally contain options to extend from to three years. The corporate headquarters lease agreement expires in April 2023 and the Company is in the process of negotiating a new lease agreement. All of the Company’s lease agreements are considered operating leases. None of the Company’s lease payments are dependent on a rate or index that may change after the commencement date, other than the passage of time.
The Company’s lease liability was $4.4 million as of March 31, 2022 and $3.4 million as of March 31, 2021. The liability is based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments using a discount rate that is determined based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate on its senior revolving credit facility. The right of use asset was $4.3 million as of March 31, 2022 and $3.4 million as of March 31, 2021.
The Company has made several policy elections related to lease assets and liabilities. The Company elected to utilize the package of transition practical expedients, which includes not reassessing the following at adoption: (i) whether existing contracts contained leases, (ii) the existing classification of leases as operating or financing, or (iii) the initial direct costs of leases. In addition, the Company did not use hindsight to determine the lease term or include options to extend for leases existing at the transition date.
The Company had elected the practical expedient of combining lease and non-lease components for its real estate leases in calculating the present value of the fixed payments without having to perform an allocation between the types of lease components. Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases in effect as of March 31, 2022, are as follows:
in thousands |
|
|
|
|
2023 |
|
$ |
1,624 |
|
2024 |
|
|
1,130 |
|
2025 |
|
|
917 |
|
2026 |
|
|
553 |
|
2027 |
|
|
293 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
481 |
|
Total future minimum lease payments |
|
|
4,998 |
|
Present value adjustment |
|
|
(588 |
) |
Operating lease liability |
|
$ |
4,410 |
|
The following table reports information about the Company’s lease cost for the twelve months ended March 31:
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
||
|
|
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
Lease cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease cost |
|
|
$ 1,736 |
|
$ 1,530 |
Variable lease cost |
|
|
347 |
|
344 |
Total lease cost |
|
|
$ 2,083 |
|
$ 1,874 |
54
The following table reports other information about the Company’s leases for the twelve months ended March 31:
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Other Lease Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Lease - Operating Cash Flows (Fixed Payments) |
|
|
$ 1,591 |
|
|
$ 1,593 |
|
||
Operating Lease - Operating Cash Flows (Liability Reduction) |
|
|
$ 1,388 |
|
|
$ 1,193 |
|
||
Weighted Average Lease Term - Operating Leases |
|
|
3.9 years |
|
|
2.8 years |
|
||
Weighted Average Discount Rate - Operating Leases |
|
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
Rent expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 was approximately $2.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively. For any new or modified lease, the Company, at the inception of the contract, determines whether a contract is or contains a lease. The Company records right-of-use ("ROU") assets and lease obligations for its operating leases, which are initially recognized based on the discounted future lease payments over the term of the lease. The Company uses its effective annual interest rate as the discount rate when evaluating leases under Topic 842.
Lease term is defined as the non-cancelable period of the lease plus any options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise the option. Further, the Company has elected to not separate lease from non-lease components. Variable lease costs include expenses such as common area maintenance, utilities, and repairs and maintenance.
9. Share-Based Payments
The Company has share awards outstanding under two share-based compensation plans (the “Equity Plans”). The Company believes that such awards generally align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders. Under the shareholder-approved 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) the Board of Directors was authorized to grant option awards for up to approximately 1.1 million common shares. On August 13, 2015, the Company’s shareholders approved the Nicholas Financial, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) for employees and non-employee directors. Under the 2015 Plan, the Board of Directors is authorized to grant total share awards for up to 750,000 common shares. Awards under the 2006 Plan will continue to be governed by the terms of that plan. The 2015 Plan replaced the 2006 Plan; accordingly, no additional option awards may be granted under the 2006 Plan. In addition to option awards, the 2015 Plan provides for restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, and other equity-based compensation.
Option awards previously granted to employees and directors under the 2006 Plan generally vest ratably based on service over a five- and three-year period, respectively, and generally have a contractual term of ten years. Vesting and contractual terms for option awards under the 2015 Plan are essentially the same as those of the 2006 Plan. Restricted stock awards generally cliff vest over a three-year period based on service conditions. Vesting of performance units generally does not commence until the attainment of Company-wide performance goals including annual revenue growth and operating income targets. There are no post-vesting restrictions for share awards.
55
The Company funds share awards from authorized but unissued shares and does not purchase shares to fulfill its obligations under the Equity Plans. Cash dividends, if any, are not paid on unvested performance units or unexercised options but are paid on unvested restricted stock awards.
The Company did not grant any options during the years ended March 31, 2022 or 2021.
A summary of option activity under the Equity Plans as of March 31, 2022, and changes during the year are presented below.
|
|
(Shares and Aggregate Intrinsic Value in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||
Options |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2021 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
$ |
11.73 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Granted |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercised |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
11.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Forfeited |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
11.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Outstanding at March 31, 2022 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
$ |
11.85 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2022 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
$ |
11.85 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, approximately 2,500 options were exercised. During the same period, approximately 16,100 options were forfeited at exercise prices ranging from $10.96 to $12.95 per share.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, no options were exercised. During the same period, approximately 7,000 options were forfeited at exercise prices ranging from $7.00 to $12.68 per share.
Cash received from options exercised during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 totaled approximately $0 and $0, respectively. As of March 31, 2022, the Company had no unrecognized compensation related to options grants. For the year ended, March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, respectively, the Company had approximately $0 and $0 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to options granted.
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested restricted shares under the Equity Plan as of March 31, 2022, and changes during the year then ended is presented below.
|
|
(Shares and Aggregate Intrinsic Value in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||
Restricted Share Awards |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
||||
Non-vested at March 31, 2021 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
$ |
9.24 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
Granted |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
11.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Vested |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
9.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Forfeited |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
11.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-vested at March 31, 2022 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
$ |
10.26 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
377 |
|
56
The Company awarded approximately 18,000 restricted shares during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022. There are no performance shares included within the 18,000 restricted shares granted that resulted from the Company meeting a performance threshold. During the same period there were approximately 2,000 restricted shares forfeited. With the adoption of ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017, the Company no longer reduces stock-based compensation by estimated forfeitures. Instead the Company accounts for forfeitures when they occur. For any vesting tranche of an award, the cumulative amount of compensation cost recognized is at least equal to the portion of the grant‑date value of the award tranche that is actually vested at that date.
As of March 31, 2022, there was approximately $139,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted share awards granted under the Equity Plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.92 years.
10. Employee Benefit Plan
The Company has a 401(k)-retirement plan under which all employees are eligible to participate. Employee contributions are voluntary and subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations. The Company did not make a discretionary matching employee contribution for the years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. The Board will re-evaluate the Company’s matching policy for plan year 2022 later in fiscal year 2023.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company currently is not a party to any pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business, none of which, if decided adversely to the Company, would, in the opinion of management, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
12. Variable Interest Entity
In March 2019, the Company entered into a senior secured credit facility collateralized by consumer finance receivables by transferring the receivables into a bankruptcy-remote variable interest entity (VIE). Under the terms of the transaction, all cash collections and other cash proceeds of the customer receivables went first to the servicer and the holders of the asset-backed notes, and then to the residual equity holder. The Company retained the servicing of the portfolio and received a monthly fee of 2.5% (annualized) based on the outstanding balance of the financed receivables, and the Company held all of the residual equity. In addition, the Company, rather than the VIE, retained certain credit insurance income together with certain recoveries related to credit insurance and on charge-offs of the financed receivables, which would continue to be reflected as a reduction of net charge-offs on a consolidated basis for as long as the Company consolidated the VIE.
On November 5, 2021 the Company entered into new senior secured credit facility (the "Credit Facility") pursuant to a loan and security agreement by and among the Borrowers, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as agent, and the lenders that are party thereto (the “Credit Agreement”). The Borrowers granted a security interest in substantially all of their assets as collateral for their obligations under the Credit Facility. The prior credit facility (the "Ares Credit Facility") pursuant to a credit agreement among the Company’s subsidiary NF Funding I, LLC, Ares Agent Services, L.P. and the lenders party thereto was paid off in connection with entering into the Credit Facility, therefore the VIE assets and liabilities are now zero. See "Note 5. Credit Facility" for more details.
57
The following table presents the assets and liabilities held by the VIE (for legal purposes, the assets and the liabilities of the VIE will remain distinct from the Company):
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted cash |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
10,955 |
|
Finance receivables, net |
|
- |
|
|
150,706 |
|
Repossessed assets |
|
- |
|
|
631 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
162,292 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
||
Credit facility, net of debt issuance costs |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
86,154 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
- |
|
|
405 |
|
Total liabilities |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
86,559 |
|
13. Stock Plans
In May 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors (“Board”) authorized a new stock repurchase program allowing for the repurchase of up to $8.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or through other structures in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. The authorization was effective immediately.
The timing and actual number of sharers will depend on a variety of factors, including stock price, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market and economic conditions. The Company’s stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
In August 2019, the Company’s Board authorized additional repurchase of up to $1.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares.
The table below summarizes treasury share transactions under the Company’s stock repurchase program.
|
|
Twelve months ended March 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
||||
Treasury shares at the beginning of period |
|
|
4,945 |
|
|
$ |
(72,343 |
) |
|
|
4,833 |
|
|
$ |
(71,438 |
) |
Treasury shares purchased |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
Treasury shares at the end of period |
|
|
5,127 |
|
|
$ |
(74,405 |
) |
|
|
4,945 |
|
|
$ |
(72,343 |
) |
14. Subsequent Events
On May 6, 2022 the Office of Hearing and Appeals SBA (OHA) rendered a decision to deny the appeal. The Company subsequently repaid the outstanding principal of $3,243,900 plus accrued and unpaid interest of $64,518 on May 23, 2022.
Share Repurchases: For the period April 1, 2022 through June 24, 2022, the Company repurchased an additional 204,032 shares of our common stock for $2.1 million at an average price of $10.00 per share.
Marketable Securities: For the period April 1, 2022 through June 24, 2022, the Company purchased certain marketable securities in the amount of $7.2 million. Holding such marketable securities may involve significant risk of loss for the Company and these marketable securities will be accounted for as trading securities.
58
COVID-19: The Company has discussed COVID-19 throughout the 10-K, including but not limited, to forward-looking information, Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
On May 10, 2022, the Company entered into a separation and release of claims agreement with the previous CEO. Pursuant to the agreement, the previous CEO’s resignation was effective as of May 9, 2022. In addition to unpaid salary and accrued vacation pay through May 9, 2022, the previous CEO is entitled to receive a severance payment of $131,250 and continuation of COBRA benefits for 4.5 months. His restricted stock awards continue to be governed by the award agreements for each award, with all unvested restricted stock forfeited. The separation and release of claims agreement contains a one year non-compete provision, and prohibits the previous CEO from soliciting customers for one year and Company employees for two years.
On May 9, 2022, the Board appointed a new Interim Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately. The Interim CEO has worked at the Company for more than 20 years. Prior to his appointment, the Interim CEO served as Vice President of Branch Operations for the Company since April 2021, as Divisional Vice President from June 2018 until April 2021, as District Manager from December 2010 until June 2018, and as Branch Manager from December 2001 until December 2010.
15. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2022 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
||||
Total revenue |
|
$ |
12,594 |
|
|
$ |
12,572 |
|
|
$ |
12,240 |
|
|
$ |
12,373 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
2,165 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
8,348 |
|
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
|
8,863 |
|
|
|
9,274 |
|
Operating income before income taxes |
|
|
2,328 |
|
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
490 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
122 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,729 |
|
|
$ |
1,603 |
|
|
$ |
(702 |
) |
|
$ |
368 |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2021 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
||||
Total revenue |
|
$ |
14,151 |
|
|
$ |
14,109 |
|
|
$ |
14,474 |
|
|
$ |
13,286 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
|
8,131 |
|
|
|
7,407 |
|
|
|
8,963 |
|
Operating income before income taxes |
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
4,975 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
|
$ |
1,267 |
|
|
$ |
3,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,869 |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
59
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information required to be disclosed in its reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s management, including its Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls will prevent all possible error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
The Company’s management, including its Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2022. Based upon this evaluation, the Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2022.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s management, including its Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2022, the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report, based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2022.
No Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, except as disclosed above.
Item 9B. Other Information
None
60
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The relevant information to be set forth in the definitive Proxy Statement and Information Circular for the 2022 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the “Proxy Statement”), is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a written code of ethics applicable to its Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the code of ethics is posted on the Company’s web site at www.nicholasfinancial.com. Anyone who wishes to receive a written copy of the code of ethics may receive one without charge by submitting a request in writing to Corporate Secretary, Nicholas Financial, Inc., 2454 McMullen Booth Road, Building C, Clearwater, Florida 33759. The Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendments to, or waivers from, the code of ethics by posting such information on the Company’s web site at www.nicholasfinancial.com. The Company is not including the information contained on or available through its web site as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Report.
Item 11. Executive Compensation, Compensation Interlocks and Insider Participation
The relevant information to be set forth in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth certain information, as of March 31, 2022, with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company were authorized for issuance:
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
(In thousands, except exercise price)
Plan Category |
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted – |
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|||
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|||
Equity Compensation Plans |
|
|
37 |
|
|
$ |
11.85 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
Equity Compensation Plans |
|
None |
|
|
Not Applicable |
|
|
None |
|
|||
TOTAL |
|
|
37 |
|
|
$ |
11.85 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
The relevant information to be set forth in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
The relevant information to be set forth in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
61
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The relevant information to be set forth in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
62
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
See Part II, Item 8, of this Report.
All financial schedules are omitted as the required information is not applicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
63
101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
64
101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104.The cover page from the Company’s Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2022, has been formatted in Inline XBRL.
* Represents a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which a director or named executive officer of the Company participated.
65
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
NICHOLAS FINANCIAL, INC. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: June 24, 2022 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Michael Rost |
|
|
|
|
Michael Rost |
|
|
|
|
Interim Chief Executive Officer |
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Jeffrey C. Royal and Michael Rost, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and any other documents in connection therewith, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael Rost |
|
Interim Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
June 24, 2022 |
Michael Rost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Irina Nashtatik |
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
June 24, 2022 |
Irina Nashtatik |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey C. Royal |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
June 24, 2022 |
Jeffrey C. Royal |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark Hutchins |
|
Director |
|
June 24, 2022 |
Mark Hutchins |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Adam K. Peterson |
|
Director |
|
June 24, 2022 |
Adam K. Peterson |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeremy Q. Zhu |
|
Director |
|
June 24, 2022 |
Jeremy Q. Zhu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brendan Keating |
|
Director |
|
June 24, 2022 |
Brendan Keating |
|
|
|
|
66