UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended August 4, 2007

Commission File number 0-6506

NOBILITY HOMES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(352) 732-5157
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NOBILITY HOMES, INC.
INDEX

2

NOBILITY HOMES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

3

NOBILITY HOMES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

4

NOBILITY HOMES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

5

Nobility Homes, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended August 4, 2007 and August 5, 2006 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.

The unaudited financial information included in this report includes all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to reflect a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. The operations for the three and nine months ended August 4, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results of the full fiscal year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Registrant’s November 4, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost of finished home inventories is determined on the specific identification method. Other inventory costs are determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventories at August 4, 2007 and November 4, 2006 are summarized as follows:

The Company provides the retail home buyer a one-year limited warranty covering defects in material or workmanship in home structure, plumbing and electrical systems. For estimated future warranty costs relating to homes sold, based upon management’s assessment of historical experience factors and current industry trends, the activity in the liability for product warranty is as follows:

6

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation Number 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” The interpretation contains a two step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company is required to adopt FIN 48 at the beginning of it’s fiscal year 2008. The Company is evaluating the impact FIN48 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 157 effective at the beginning of its fiscal year 2009. The Company is evaluating the impact this statement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 allows companies to elect to follow fair value accounting for certain financial assets and liabilities in an effort to mitigate volatility in earnings without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 is applicable only to certain financial instruments and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is evaluating the impact this statement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

7

The Company is contingently liable under terms of repurchase agreements with financial institutions providing dealer floor plan financing arrangements for independent dealers of its manufactured homes. These arrangements, which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of homes sold to independent dealers in the event of default by the independent dealer. The repurchase obligation is on an individual unit basis and the price the Company is obligated to pay declines over the period of the repurchase agreement (generally 18-24 months) and the risk of loss is further reduced by the sales value of any homes which may be required to be repurchased. The contingent liability under these repurchase agreements amounted to approximately $536,000 and $1,397,000 at August 4, 2007 and November 4, 2006, respectively. The Company applies FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 3 and SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies to account for its liability for repurchase commitments. Under the provisions of FIN 45, during the period in which a home is sold (inception of a repurchase commitment), the Company records the greater of the estimated fair value of the non-contingent obligation or a contingent liability under the provisions of SFAS No. 5, based on historical information available at the time, as a reduction to revenue. Additionally, subsequent to the inception of the repurchase commitment, the Company evaluates the likelihood that it will be called on to perform under the inventory repurchase commitments. If it becomes probable that a dealer will default and a SFAS No. 5 loss reserve should be recorded, then such contingent liability is recorded equal to the estimated loss on repurchase. Based on identified changes in dealers’ financial conditions, the Company evaluates the probability of default for the group of dealers who are identified at an elevated risk of default and applies a probability of default to the group, based on historical default rates. Changes in the reserve, if any, are recorded as an adjustment to revenue. Following the inception of the commitment, the recorded reserve, if any, is reduced over the repurchase period and is eliminated once the dealer sells the home. Based upon management’s analysis, the fair value of the FIN45 guarantee related to the Company’s repurchase agreements is not material and no amounts have been recorded related to the fair value of the guarantee in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In addition, there were no homes repurchased under any of the Company’s repurchase agreement(s) in fiscal years 2007 or 2006.

The Company continues to be subject to an ongoing Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examination for the years ended November 6, 2004 and November 1, 2003. The IRS Agent’s report for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 proposes additional taxes of approximately $426,000 and $732,000, respectively, which relates to a potential accumulated earnings tax. Management has and will continue to vigorously contest the IRS Agent’s position. Accordingly, no accrual has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the contested tax adjustments since the ultimate liability, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Any ultimate liability related to this accumulated earnings tax is not expected to be material in relation to the consolidated financial position of the Company, but could be material in relation to the earnings of the period in which a determination occurs.

Certain claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business have been filed or are pending against the Company. In the opinion of management, the ultimate outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company does not maintain casualty insurance on some of our property, including the inventory at our retail centers, our plant machinery and plant equipment and is at risk for those types of losses.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes certain key sales statistics and percent of gross profit as of and for three and nine months ended August 4, 2007 and August 5, 2006.

8

For the three and nine month periods ended August 4, 2007 and August 5, 2006, results of operations are as follows. Total net sales in third quarter 2007 were $10,739,808 compared to $14,892,812 in the third quarter 2006. Total net sales for the first nine months of 2007 were $29,866,261 compared to $45,288,874 for the first nine months of 2006. Third quarter sales and operations for fiscal 2007 were adversely impacted by the reduced manufactured housing shipments in Florida plus the overall decline in Florida and the nation’s housing market. Industry shipments in Florida for the Company’s first nine months of fiscal 2007 were down approximately 50% from the same period last year. Although the current overall housing market has declined significantly this year, the long-term demographic trends still favor strong growth in the Florida market area we serve. Management remains convinced that our specific geographic market is one of the best long-term growth areas in the country and because of the strong operating leverage inherent in the Company; we expect to continue out-performing the industry. Assuming a strong and stable economy, improved sales in the existing home market, stable unemployment and increasing, but still low, interest rates, management expects the demand for our homes to improve over the long-term.

Cost of goods sold at our manufacturing facilities include: materials, direct and indirect labor, and manufacturing expenses (which consists of factory occupancy, salary and salary related delivery costs, mobile home service costs and other manufacturing expenses). Cost of goods sold at our retail sales centers include: appliances, air conditioners, electrical and plumbing hook-ups, furniture, insurance, impact and permit fees, land and home fees, manufactured home, service warranty, setup contractor, interior drywall finish, setup display, skirting, steps, well and septic tank and other expenses.

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 29.9% in third quarter 2007 compared to 28.9% in third quarter 2006 and was 28.9% for the first nine months of 2007 compared to 29.5% for the first nine months of 2006. The increase in gross profit in third quarter was primarily due to the decrease in material cost at the manufacturing facilities. The decrease in gross profit in the first nine months of 2007 was primarily due to the lower sales at the manufacturing facilities and certain fixed manufacturing expenses.

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales was 18.0% in third quarter of 2007 compared to 14.3% in the third quarter of 2006 and was 18.7% for the first nine months of 2007 compared to 14.8% for the first nine months of 2006. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses resulted from the lower sales at the manufacturing facilities and the Company’s retail sales and certain fixed general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses at our manufacturing facility includes: salaries, professional services, advertising and promotions, corporate expense, employee benefits, office equipment and supplies and utilities. Selling, general and administrative expenses at our retail sales centers includes: advertising, retail sales centers expenses, salary and salary related, professional fees, corporate expense, employee benefits, office equipment and supplies, utilities and travel. Selling, general and administrative expenses at the insurance company includes: advertising, professional fees and office supplies.

Insurance revenues in third quarter 2007 were $115,406 compared to $76,389 in the third quarter 2006. Total insurance revenues for the first nine months of 2007 were $351,275 compared to $251,479 for the first nine months of 2006. These increases resulted from increased contingency payments earned based on participation of profitability with insurance companies due to low claims, as well as new policies generated and renewal of existing policies. Prestige’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Mountain Financial, Inc., operates as an independent insurance agent. Its principal activity is the performance of retail insurance services, which involves placing various types of insurance, including property and casualty, automobile, and extended home warranty coverage, with insurance underwriters on behalf of its Prestige customers in connection with their purchase and financing of manufactured homes. As agent, Mountain Financial solely assists our Prestige customers in obtaining various insurance and extended warranty coverage with insurance underwriters. As such, we have no agreements with homeowners and/or third party insurance companies other than agency agreements with various insurance carriers, which lead us to conclude that the Company has no material commitments or contingencies related to Mountain Financial, Inc.

The Company earned from its joint venture, Majestic 21, $74,399 in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $105,391 for the third quarter of 2006. For the first nine months of 2007 the Company earned from Majestic 21 $229,148 compared to $310,354 for the first nine months of 2006. The earnings from Majestic 21 represent the allocation of the Company’s share of net income on a 50/50 basis. The Majestic 21 portfolio of loans is not being increased and as the portfolio continues to runoff, the income will continue to decline.

The Company reported earnings from the finance revenue sharing agreement between 21^st Mortgage Corporation, Prestige Home Centers, Inc. and Majestic Homes Inc. in the amount of $154,400 in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $105,000 for the third quarter of 2006 in which the Company reported earnings for the first time. For the first nine months of 2007 earnings from the finance revenue sharing agreement were $424,200 compared to $201,000 in the first nine months of 2006.

9

The Company earned interest on cash equivalents and investments in the amount of $193,658 for the third quarter of 2007 compared to $199,723 for the third quarter of 2006. For the first nine months of 2007 interest earned on cash equivalents and investments were $584,310 compared to $581,365 in the first nine months of 2006.

As a result of the factors discussed above, earnings for the third quarter of 2007 were $1,155,288 or $.28 per diluted share compared to $1,675,219 or $.41 per diluted share for the third quarter 2006. For the first nine months of 2007 earnings were $2,955,277 or $0.72 per diluted share compared to $5,084,283 or $1.23 per diluted share in the third quarter 2006.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents were $11,655,260 at August 4, 2007 compared to $12,380,874 at November 4, 2006. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to the payment of cash dividends. Short and long-term investments were $11,975,885 at August 4, 2007 compared to $12,144,817 at November 4, 2006. Working capital was $23,245,323 at August 4, 2007 as compared to $22,043,781 at November 4, 2006. Nobility owns the entire inventory for its Prestige retail sales centers and does not incur any third party floor plan financing expenses. Inventories increased to $13,094,609 at August 4, 2007, from $12,413,704 at November 4, 2006 primarily due to an increase in the number of homes in inventory at the Company’s retail sales centers. Customer deposits continued to decrease to a normal historic level.

Nobility paid an annual cash dividend of $0.50 per common share for fiscal year 2006 on January 12, 2007 in the amount of $2,041,071. On January 13, 2006, the Company paid an annual cash dividend of $0.30 per common share for fiscal year 2005 in the amount of $1,217,618.

Nobility maintains a revolving credit agreement with a major bank providing for borrowing up to $4,000,000. At August 4, 2007 and November 4, 2006, there were no amounts outstanding under this agreement.

Nobility’s operations may require significant capital expenditures during fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006, as the Company considers increasing manufacturing plant capacity through plant expansion and purchasing some of our current retail sales centers locations that are currently leased and opening new retail sales centers in Florida. Nobility may also require additional funds for capital expenditures relating to its finance revenue sharing agreement and to underwrite its own construction and mortgage loans. Working capital requirements will be met with internal sources.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company applies judgment and estimates, which may have a material effect in the eventual outcome of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, for accounts receivable, inventory and goodwill. The following explains the basis and the procedure for each account where judgment and estimates are applied.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from its retail sales upon the occurrence of the following:

The Company recognizes revenues from its independent dealers upon receiving wholesale floor plan financing or establishing retail credit approval for terms, shipping of the home, and transferring title and risk of loss to the independent dealer. For wholesale shipments to independent dealers, the Company has no obligation to setup the home or to complete any other significant obligations.

10

The Company recognizes revenues from its wholly-owned subsidiary, Mountain Financial, Inc., as follows: commission income (and fees in lieu of commissions) is recorded as of the effective date of insurance coverage or the billing date, whichever is later. Commissions on premiums billed and collected directly by insurance companies are recorded as revenue when received which, in many cases, is the Company’s first notification of amounts earned due to the lack of policy and renewal information. Contingent commissions are recorded as revenue when received. Contingent commissions are commissions paid by insurance underwriters and are based on the estimated profit and/or overall volume of business placed with the underwriter. The data necessary for the calculation of contingent commissions cannot be reasonably obtained prior to the receipt of the commission which, in many cases, is the Company’s first notification of amounts earned. The Company provides appropriate reserves for policy cancellations based on numerous factors, including past transaction history with customers, historical experience, and other information, which is periodically evaluated and adjusted as deemed necessary. In the opinion of management, no reserve is deemed necessary for policy cancellations at August 4, 2007 and August 5, 2006.

Investment in Majestic 21

Majestic 21 was formed in 1997 as a joint venture with our joint venture partner, an unrelated entity ^(21st Mortgage Corporation (“21^st Mortgage”)). We have been allocated our share of net income and distributions on a 50/50 basis since Majestic 21‘s formation. While Majestic 21 has been deemed to be a variable interest entity, the Company only holds a 50% interest in this entity and all allocations of profit and loss are on a 50/50 basis. Since all allocations are to be made on a 50/50 basis and the Company’s maximum exposure is limited to it’s investment in Majestic 21, management has concluded that the Company would not absorb a majority of Majestic 21‘s expected losses nor receive a majority of Majestic 21‘s expected residual returns; therefore, the Company is not required to consolidate Majestic 21 with the accounts of Nobility Homes in accordance with FIN 46R. Management believes that the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with Majestic 21 is its investment in the joint venture recorded in the accounts of Nobility Homes of $1,614,129 as of August 4, 2007 and $1,500,348 as of August 5, 2006. However, based on management’s evaluation, there was no impairment of this investment at August 4, 2007 or August 5, 2006.

The Company is not obligated to repurchase any foreclosed/repossessed units of Majestic 21 as it does not have a repurchase agreement or any other guarantees with Majestic 21. The Company resells foreclosed/repossessed units of Majestic 21 through the Company’s network of retail centers as we believe it benefits the historical loss experience of the joint venture. We earn commissions from reselling such foreclosed/repossessed units and have historically not recorded any material losses in connection with this activity.

Finance Revenue Sharing Agreement

The finance revenue sharing agreement is between 21^st Mortgage Corporation, Prestige Home Centers, Inc, and Majestic Homes, Inc. and no separate entity has been formed. As a condition to the finance revenue sharing agreement, the Company has agreed to repurchase homes from defaulted loans which were financed under the agreement. However, the Company has only minimal risk of loss due to loan loss reserves set up in the finance revenue sharing agreement. No losses have been incurred in connection with the finance revenue sharing agreement.

Goodwill

Between 1995 and 1998 the Company acquired retail sales centers accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. As a result, goodwill is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets. A valuation was performed by the Company and it was determined that the estimated fair value of the acquired sales centers exceeded their book value. There is no assurance that the value of the acquired sales centers will not decrease in the future due to changing business conditions.

Warranty Costs

The warranty reserve is established at the time of revenue recognition based on management’s best estimate of costs that may be incurred under the Company’s warranty policies.

Vendor Volume Rebates

The Company receives volume rebates from its vendors based upon reaching a certain level of purchased materials during a specified period of time. Volume rebates are estimated based upon annual purchases, and are adjusted quarterly if the accrued volume rebate is applicable.

11

Dealer Volume Rebates

The Company pays a volume rebate to independent dealers based upon the dollar volume of homes purchased and paid for by the dealer in excess of a certain specific dollar amount during a specific time period. Dealer volume rebates are accrued when sales are recognized.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including our statement about future demand for our manufactured homes and that working capital requirements will be met with internal sources. Although Nobility believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there are risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, competitive pricing pressures at both the wholesale and retail levels, increasing material costs, continued excess retail inventory, increase in repossessions, changes in market demand, changes in interest rates, availability of financing for retail and wholesale purchasers, consumer confidence, adverse weather conditions that reduce sales at retail centers, the risk of manufacturing plant shutdowns due to storms or other factors, the impact of marketing and cost-management programs, reliance on the Florida economy, impact of labor shortage, impact of materials shortage, increasing labor cost, cyclical nature of the manufactured housing industry, impact of rising fuel costs, catastrophic events impacting insurance costs, availability of insurance coverage for various risks to Nobility, market demographics, management’s ability to attract and retain executive officers and key personnel, increased global tensions, market disruptions resulting from terrorist or other attack and any armed conflict involving the United States and the impact of inflation.

Certain of the Company’s financial instruments are subject to market risk, including interest rate and equity price risks; however, due to the makeup of our investment portfolio this market risk is considered minimal. The Company manages its exposure to these risks through its regular operating and financing activities.

We do not engage in investing in or trading market risk sensitive financial instruments. We also do not purchase for investing, hedging, or for purposes “other than trading” financial instruments that are likely to expose us to significant market risk, whether interest rate, foreign currency, commodity price, or equity price risk. The Company’s financial instruments are not currently subject to foreign currency or commodity risk. The Company has no financial instrument held for trading purposes.

We do not have any indebtedness as of August 4, 2007. If we were to borrow from our revolving credit agreement, we would be exposed to changes in interest rates. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes.

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the fiscal period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in this report was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed in this report was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with this evaluation that occurred during the period covered by this report and that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

12

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION AND SIGNATURES

There have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors since November 4, 2006. See risk factors at November 4, 2006 within the Company’s Form 10-K.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

13