Noble Vici Group, Inc. - Annual Report: 2015 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission file number: 000-54239

GOLD UNION INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

L8-09 Wisma BU 8, No. 11 Lebuh Bandar Utama,

Bandar Utama PJU 6, 47600 Petaling Jaya,

Selangor, Malaysia  

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)  

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (+603)76297080

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o No S

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.     

Yes o No S

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes S No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes S No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. S

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 

Yes S No o

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of April 14, 2016, computed by reference to the price at which such stock was last sold on the OTC Bulletin Board ($0.05 per share) on that date, was approximately $39,406,725.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Forward Looking Statements

This Form 10-K contains “forward-looking” statements including statements regarding our expectations of our future operations. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” or “continue” or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, many of which are not within our control.

These risks and uncertainties include international, national, and local general economic and market conditions; our ability to sustain, manage, or forecast growth, our ability to successfully make and integrate acquisitions, new product development and introduction, existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations, adverse publicity, competition, fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results, change in business strategy or development plans, business disruptions, the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. Although the forward-looking statements in this report reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by them. In light of these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to announce publicly revisions we make to these forward-looking statements to reflect the effect of events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report. All written and oral forward-looking statements made subsequent to the date of this report and attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this section.

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

History

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on July 6, 2010 under the name “Advanced Ventures Corp.” . Effective January 6, 2014, we changed our name to “Gold Union Inc.”

In connection with our former business, we entered into an exclusive worldwide patent sale agreement (the “Patent Transfer and Sales Agreement”) with Ilanit Appelfeld (the “Seller”), to acquire a patented technology, U.S. Patent Number: 6,743,209 (the “Patent”), for a catheter with a integral anchoring mechanism on July 27, 2010. We acquired the patent and technology for $17,500 (seventeen thousand five hundred United States Dollars), according to the terms and conditions specified in the Patent Transfer and Sales Agreement related to U.S. Patent Number: 6,743,209.

During the second quarter of 2011 the Company raised gross proceeds of $75,000 pursuant to an effective Form S-1 Registration Statement and issued 37,500,000 post forward stock split shares of common stock that were registered pursuant to the Form S-1 Registration Statement.

Effective March 7, 2012, we increased the number of our authorized shares of common stock to three billion shares (3,000,000,000) and engaged in a forward stock split of its common shares whereby each one share of our common stock was split into fifteen shares of our common stock.

During the second fiscal quarter of 2014, we elected to discontinue our business of exploiting the Patent and began to consider other business opportunities that may bring quicker and greater value to our stockholders. We initially considered entering into the business of trading precious metal bullion primarily in the Asia Pacific region. Therefore, effective January 6, 2014, we changed our name to “Gold Union Inc.” to more adequately reflect our initial intended business operations.

During the third fiscal quarter of 2014, we identified an opportunity to enter into the real property development business in Cambodia. On August 28, 2014, we executed a Share Exchange Agreement with G.U. International Limited, a limited company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Seychelles and our wholly owned subsidiary (“GUI”), and Kao Wei-Chen, an individual representing herself and 8 other individuals (collectively, the “Golden Corridor Shareholders”), which agreement was amended several times to extend the closing date of the acquisition (collectively, the “Share Exchange Agreement”). Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, we, through GUI, purchased 480 shares of Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Co. Limited (the “GC Shares”), from 9 private Golden Corridor Shareholders, representing 48% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Golden Corridor. As consideration, we agreed to issue to the Golden Corridor Shareholders 2,500,000,000 shares of our common stock, at a value of US $0.002 per share, for an aggregate value of US $5,000,000. We consummated the acquisition of the GC Shares on December 31, 2015.

Golden Corridor owns three parcels of land located at National Road 44, Phum Phkung, Chbarmorn Commune, Chbarmorn District, Kampong Speu Province, Kingdom of Cambodia, measuring an aggregate of 172,510 square meters (collectively, the “Properties”). Pursuant to an independent valuation conducted by a third party appraisal firm licensed under the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Cambodia and the Securities and Exchange Commission of Cambodia, the Properties have an estimated value of US $10,350,600 as of April 8, 2014. Golden Corridor intends to develop the Properties into an industrial park for rental income within the next two or three years. Golden Corridor has not yet commenced any significant operations.

As a result of our acquisition of the GC Shares, we elected to cease our metal bullion trading business and enter into the real estate development and rental business located in the Kingdom of Cambodia.

A chart of our corporate structure is set forth below.

Description of Business

On August 14th, 2013, PHNOM PENH GOLDEN CORRIDOR TRADING CO., LTD. (“Golden Corridor”) was officially registered as a private limited liability company and obtained the company business license from the Ministry of Commerce of the Kingdom of Cambodia. Golden Corridor intends to engage in the business of purchasing, selling and leasing of land and houses, as well as making investments in industrial properties.

On September 2, 2013, Golden Corridor acquired 3 parcels of land totaling 172,510 square meters located at National Road 44, Phum Phkung, Chbarmorn Commune, Chbarmorn District, Kampong Speu Province, Kingdom of Cambodia (the “Properties”) at a purchase price of 2,560,950,000 Riel. On April 8th, 2014, Vtrust Appraisal Co., Ltd., a valuation company having valuation license from Ministry of Economy and Finance and Securities and Exchange Commission of Cambodia (SECC), appraised that the Properties at a fair market value of approximately US$10,356,000. According to the valuation report, the Properties are classified under Community Development type of property.

Golden Corridor plans to develop the Properties into an industrial park. It expects to construct, market, sell and or lease light industrial factories, shop lots and low and medium cost residential houses on the Properties. Golden Corridor estimates that it will require approximately US$200,000 to engage the necessary technical experts (including a property development consultant, architect, and civil and electrical engineers) to draw up a comprehensive property development plan. It hopes to raise such funds through loans from its executive officers, directors or shareholders or financial institutions. In the event that Golden Corridor fails to raise the funds required within the next 12 months, it may apply to the land authority in Phnom Penh to subdivide the Properties into smaller parcels and sell such parcels to small and medium sized enterprises and individuals to build their factories, shops and low and medium cost houses in accordance to the current laws in the Kingdom of Cambodia. Golden Corridor hopes to complete such development within the next two or three years, subject to the final approval from the local government.

There can be no assurance that Golden Corridor or the Company will ever obtain such funds required to commence property development. Accordingly, our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered in establishing a new property development business, and therefore, our investment in Golden Corridor is a highly speculative venture involving significant financial risk.

Market Information

According to an April 2014 report by CB Richard Ellis (Cambodia) Co. Ltd., an affiliate of CBRE Group, Inc., the industrial market in Cambodia remained stable with continued foreign direct investment in manufacturing. It was reported that the inflation rate of Cambodia was 2.9% for the year 2014 which was relatively low as compared to other countries in the Southeast Asian region. It also reported the following trends: the minimum wages for manufacturing sector are comparatively low; Cambodia’s industrial output grew by 9.5% over the course 2013, the 17th highest industrial growth rate globally and above wider Cambodian GPD of 7.3%; the minimum wage for manufacturing industry workers that were introduced in 2014 appeared not to have significantly diminished demand for industrial space in the short-term; and the rents in industrial zones were generally stable as a continuation of trends seen in 2013, with a rental rate of US$2.50 per square meter per month for prime locations in industrial zones and US$2.0 per square meter per month in lower quality industrial zones, where units are of a lesser standard. It is believed that there remains a distinct lack in the supply of light industrial buildings as occupancy levels in existing industrial zones remain high.

Near-Term Requirements For Additional Capital

For the immediate future, we intend to finance our real estate development efforts and any future real estate acquisitions through sales of our securities to existing shareholders and loans from existing shareholders or financial institutions.

We intend to focus on our near-term goal of developing our Properties and any other properties slated for acquisition through prudent use of available resources and our long-term goal of maximizing the value of our development projects. We believe that Kampong Speu, Cambodia is a desirable market and we intend to continue exploring acquisitions in the region. We believe that our developments will have inherent value given their unique nature and location and that this value should be sustainable in the future.

Golden Corridor is subject to all of the risks inherent in a property development company, including the fall in value of the Properties. It has never generated revenues. We expect Golden Corridor to incur relatively small operating losses over the next twelve months until we begin property development activities. There can be no assurance that that we will ever be successful in our new real estate development business.

Competition 

The real estate development business is highly competitive and fragmented. We compete against numerous public and private developers of varying sizes, ranging from local to national in scope. As a result, we may be competing for investment opportunities, financing, and potential buyers with entities that may possess greater financial, marketing, or other resources than we have. Competition for potential buyers has been intensified by an increase in the number of available properties resulting from the recent boom in the real estate market. Our prospective customers generally have a variety of choices of new and existing homes, commercial buildings, home and commercial sites when considering a purchase. We attempt to differentiate our properties primarily on the basis of community design, location, price, quality, uniqueness, and amenities. 

The real estate investment industry is highly fragmented among individuals, partnerships and public and private entities, with no dominant single entity or person. Although we may compete against large sophisticated owners and operators, owners and operators of any size can provide effective competition for prospective tenants. We compete for tenants primarily on the basis of property location, rent charged, and the design and condition of improvements.

Intellectual Property

We expect to rely on, trade secrets, copyrights, know-how, trademarks, license agreements and contractual provisions to establish our intellectual property rights and protect our brand and services. These legal means, however, afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.

In addition, the laws of Cambodia may not protect our brand and services and intellectual property to the same extent as U.S. laws, if at all. We may be unable to fully protect our intellectual property rights in these countries.

We intend to seek the widest possible protection for significant product and process developments in our major markets through a combination of trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and patents, if applicable. We anticipate that the form of protection will vary depending upon the level of protection afforded by the particular jurisdiction. We expect that our revenue will be derived principally from our operations in Cambodia where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce. In such instances, we may seek protection of our intellectual property through measures taken to increase the confidentiality of our findings. 

We intend to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our companies and products. We intend protect our trademarks against infringement and also seek to register design protection where appropriate.

We rely on trade secrets and unpatentable know-how that we seek to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements. We expect that, where applicable, we will require our employees to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment with us. We expect these agreements to provide that all confidential information developed or made known to the individual during the course of the individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific limited circumstances. The agreements will also provide that all inventions conceived by the individual while rendering services to us shall be assigned to us as the exclusive property of our company. There can be no assurance, however, that all persons who we desire to sign such agreements will sign, or if they do, that these agreements will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any breach, or that our trade secrets or unpatentable know-how will not otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors. 

Government Regulation and Environmental Matters

Our real estate investments are subject to extensive local, city, county and state rules and regulations regarding permitting, zoning, subdivision, utilities and water quality as well as federal rules and regulations relating to the environment and wildlife such as air and water quality and protection of endangered species and their habitats. Such regulation may delay development of our properties and result in higher than anticipated developmental and administrative costs. Based on an analysis of our operations in relation to current and presently anticipated environmental requirements, we currently do not anticipate that these costs will have a material adverse effect on our future operations or financial condition.

According to a July 2014 report by CB Richard Ellis (Cambodia) Co. Ltd., land titles in Cambodia are represented in two forms: soft and hard title. Soft title refers to a title where a property is registered at the local municipal level but which cannot be used as collateral for bank loans while hard title refers to a title issued at the national government level which can be used as collateral for bank loans. Hard title is the most secure form of ownership. However, the majority of transactions still occur for land with soft title to avoid high transaction costs which include property registration taxes and ownership transfer fees. Private freehold ownership is permissible for all types of land but the full ownership is restricted to Cambodian citizens or companies with the majority of shares being owned by Cambodian citizens. Foreign investors may acquire freehold land only through a land holding company, 51% of which is controlled by a Cambodian citizen or company. Foreign investors can also use land in Cambodia under a long-term lease. The maximum lease term is restricted to 50 years determined by the civil code established in December 2011. The lease structure system allows foreign investors to lease property if the property is properly registered with a land title certificate. Property tax is levied on all property worth over 100 million Riel in Cambodia. This report also described the government’s taxes on the sale, transfer and ownership of land and properties in Cambodia. According to the report, tax is payable annually by the owner of the property at a rate of 0.1% of the government assessed value; Unused Land Tax is payable for all unused land, calculated at a rate of 2% of the market value of the land per square meter as determined by the Unused Land Valuation Commission of the Ministry of Economy and Finance, on an annually basis; and Property Transfer Tax is levied on a sale of land with Hard Title, at 4% of the assessed property value determined by the tax department, by the purchaser.

Seasonality

Our real estate business is not subject to seasonality.

Insurance

Neither we nor Golden Corridor currently maintain property, business interruption and casualty insurance. Golden Corridor intends to obtain such insurance in accordance with customary industry practices.

Employees 

We currently do not have any full time or part time employees. Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary, Lim Yew Chuan, is expected to carry out all administrative functions. Once Golden Corridor begins development activities, we expect Golden Corridor to hire additional officers and employees for such operations.

We do not have any union employees.  

Corporation Information 

During the fiscal year 2015 our principal executive office was located at 18th Floor, Canadia Tower #315, Monivong Boulevard, Corner Ang Duong Street, 12202 Phnom Penh, Cambodia, Tel: 855 23 962 300. Since March 1, 2016, our principal executive office was relocated to L8-09 Wisma BU 8, No. 11 Lebuh Bandar Utama, Bandar Utama PJU 6, 47600 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia, telephone number (+603)76297080, facsimile (+603)76297083.

We have engaged Nevada Agency and Transfer Company located at 50 West Liberty Street, Reno, Nevada 89501, telephone number (775) 322-0626, facsimile (775) 322-5623, to serve as our stock transfer agent.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 2. Properties.

During the fiscal year 2015, our principal executive office was located at 18^th Floor, Canadia Tower, #315, Monivong Boulevard, Corner Ang Duong Street, 12202 Phnom Penh, Cambodia, Telephone No.: +855 23 962 300. We were party to a month to month lease with Regus, an unaffiliated third party, at a monthly rate of $79.00. On March 1, 2016, our principal office was relocated to L8-09 Wisma BU 8, No. 11 Lebuh Bandar Utama, Bandar Utama PJU 6, 47600 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia, telephone number (+603)76297080, facsimile (+603)76297083. This office is provided by our new substantial shareholder, Ms. Kao Wei-Chen, at no charge and no fixed term.

We believe that our current facilities are adequate for our current needs. We intend to secure new facilities or expand existing facilities as necessary to support future growth. We believe that suitable additional space will be available on commercially reasonable terms as needed to accommodate our operations.

We also own three parcels of land located at National Road 44, Phum Phkung, Chbarmorn Commune, Chbarmorn District, Kampong Speu Province, Kingdom of Cambodia, measuring an aggregate of 172,510 square meters. We intend to develop these parcels into an industrial park. We expect to construct, market, sell and or lease light industrial factories, shop lots and low and medium cost residential houses on these parcels.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our property is subject, nor are there any such proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities. None of our directors, officers, affiliates or any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of our common stock, or any associate of any of the foregoing, is involved in a proceeding adverse to our business or has a material interest adverse to our business.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

(a) Market Information

Shares of our common stock are quoted on the OTCPink under the symbol “GOLU”. As of April 11, 2016, the last closing price of our securities was $0.05, with little to no quoting activity. There is no established public trading market for our securities and a regular trading market may not develop, or if developed, may not be sustained.

Our trading symbol was changed from “ANCV” to “GOLU” in January 2014. Our common stock was posted for trading under the symbol “ANCV” since approximately July 6, 2011, with little to no trading or volume.

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low bid information for our common stock, as reported on the OTCQB. The following quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

(b)  Approximate Number of Holders of Common Stock

As of April 11, 2016, there were approximately 50 shareholders of record of our common stock. Such number does not include any shareholders holding shares in nominee or “street name”.

(c)  Dividends

Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by our board of directors. We paid no dividends during the periods reported herein, nor do we anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

(d)  Equity Compensation Plan Information

None.

(e)  Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The information set forth below describes our issuance of securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, during the year ended December 31, 2015, that were not previously disclosed in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K: None.

ITEM 6.  Selected Financial Data.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the operating results, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows of the Company and its subsidiary for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. The discussion and analysis that follows should be read together with the section entitled “Forward Looking Statements” and our financial statements and the notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this section are forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties and are based upon judgments concerning various factors that are beyond the Company’s control. Consequently, and because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, the actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report.

Overview

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on July 6, 2010 under the name “Advanced Ventures Corp.” and are a development stage company. Effective January 6, 2014, we changed our name to “Gold Union Inc.”

In connection with our former business, we entered into an exclusive worldwide patent sale agreement (the “Patent Transfer and Sales Agreement”) with Ilanit Appelfeld (the “Seller”), to acquire a patented technology, U.S. Patent Number: 6,743,209 (the “Patent”), for a catheter with a integral anchoring mechanism on July 27, 2010. We acquired the patent and technology for $17,500 (seventeen thousand five hundred United States Dollars), according to the terms and conditions specified in the Patent Transfer and Sales Agreement related to U.S. Patent Number: 6,743,209.

During the second quarter of 2011 the Company raised gross proceeds of $75,000 pursuant to an effective Form S-1 Registration Statement and issued 37,500,000 post forward stock split shares of common stock that were registered pursuant to the Form S-1 Registration Statement.

During the second fiscal quarter of 2014, we elected to discontinue our business of exploiting the Patent and began to consider other business opportunities that may bring quicker and greater value to our stockholders. We initially considered entering into the business of trading precious metal bullion primarily in the Asia Pacific region. We anticipated such business to be carried on through subsidiaries, which were expected to buy gold and silver bullion from refiners and subsequently sell the bullion to anticipated customers. Therefore, effective January 6, 2014, we changed our name to “Gold Union Inc.” to more adequately reflect our intended business operations.

During the third fiscal quarter of 2014, we identified an opportunity to enter into the real property development business in Cambodia. On August 28, 2014, we executed a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with G.U. International Limited, a limited company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Seychelles and our wholly owned subsidiary (“GUI”), and Kao Wei-Chen, an individual representing herself and 18 other individuals (collectively, the “PPGCT Shareholders”), pursuant to which we, through GUI, would purchase 480 shares of Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Co. Limited, a private limited company incorporated under the laws of the Kingdom of Cambodia (“PPGCT”), held by the PPGCT Shareholders, representing 48% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of PPGCT. As consideration, we agreed to issue to the PPGCT Shareholders 2,500,000,000 shares of our common stock, at a value of US $0.002 per share, for an aggregate value of US $5,000,000. The share exchange transaction closed December 31, 2015. It is our understanding that the PPGCT Shareholders are not U.S. Persons within the meaning of Regulations S. Accordingly, the Shares are being sold pursuant to the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Regulation S promulgated thereunder. A copy of the Share Exchange Agreement and its amendments are incorporated herein by reference and filed as Exhibits 10.3 through and including 10.6 to this annual report.

PPGCT owns three parcels of land located in the Kingdom of Cambodia, Kampong Speu Province, Chbarmorn District measuring an aggregate of 172,510 square meters (collectively, the “Properties”). Upon the consummation of the share exchange transaction, we hope to enter into the real property development business in Cambodia.

On July 21, 2014, we formed G.U. Asia Limited, a limited company, under the laws of Hong Kong, for the purpose of conducting business in Asia.

On July 31, 2014, we formed G.U. International Limited, a limited company, under the laws of the Republic of Seychelles, to operate our prospective real property development business.

Financial Condition

During the twelve-month period following the date of this annual report, we anticipate that we will not generate any revenue. Accordingly, we will be required to obtain additional financing in order to pursue our plan of operations during and beyond the next twelve months. We believe that debt financing will not be an alternative for funding as we do not have tangible assets to secure any debt financing. We anticipate that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock or shareholder loans. However, we do not have any financing arranged and we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock or shareholder loans to establish our new business.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014

The following table sets forth certain operational data for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014:

Net Revenue. We have not generated revenues since inception and have not yet commenced business operations. We are working to develop our real estate development business in Cambodia and hope to generate revenue as such businesses develop.

Operating Loss. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we incurred operating losses of $161,966, consisting solely of professional fees. During the same period ended December 31, 2014, our operating expense was $125,036, consisting of professional fees.

Other Income (Expense), net. We recorded net other expense in the amount of $35,432 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $520 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, which was a loss in foreign currency transactions.

Net Loss. We recorded a net loss of $161,966 and $124,516 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively. The increase in net loss is primarily due to an increase in professional fees associated with the acquisition of Golden Corridor and our equity loss from our investment in Golden Corridor.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern and, accordingly, do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and realization of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in operation. We are not generating revenue and are dependent upon obtaining financing to continue our business plans. For these reasons our auditors stated in their report on our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, that they have substantial doubt we will be able to continue as a going concern.

As of December 31, 2015, our current assets were $120,577 consisting of cash and cash equivalents and prepayment and deposit and our current liabilities were $214,837 resulting in a working capital deficit of $94,260. Our current liabilities consisted of $189,063 in advances from our director and $25,774 in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Stockholders’ equity decreased from $277,471 as of December 31, 2014, to $153,890 as of December 31, 2015.

We have never paid dividends on our Common Stock. Our present policy is to apply cash to investments in product development, acquisitions or expansion; consequently, we do not expect to pay dividends on Common Stock in the foreseeable future.

The success of our growth strategy is dependent upon the availability of additional capital resources on terms satisfactory to management. Our sources of capital in the past have included the sale of equity securities, which include common stock sold in private transactions and public offerings, capital leases and long-term debt. There can be no assurance that we can raise such additional capital resources on satisfactory terms. We believe that our current cash and other sources of liquidity discussed below are adequate to support operations for at least the next 12 months. We anticipate continuing to rely on equity sales of our common shares and shareholder loans in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to our existing shareholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of our equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our plan of operations.

Net Cash Used In Operating Activities.

We have not generated any revenues since inception. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, net cash used in operating activities was $197,356 compared to net cash used in operating activities of $94,399 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014. Net cash used consisted of a net loss of $161,966 and accrued expenses of $35,390.

Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, net cash provided by financing activities was $118,967 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $51,596 for the same period ended December 31, 2014. Net cash provided from financing activities during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 consisted of advances from stockholders.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no outstanding off-balance sheet guarantees, interest rate swap transactions or foreign currency contracts. We do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires our management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported, including the notes thereto, and related disclosures of commitments and contingencies, if any. We have identified certain accounting policies that are significant to the preparation of our financial statements. These accounting policies are important for an understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management's subjective or complex judgment, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting the estimate may differ significantly from management's current judgments. We believe the following accounting policies are critical in the preparation of our financial statements.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reporting amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments; income tax rate, income tax provision, deferred tax assets and valuation allowance of deferred tax assets and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and Income-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d) amount due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Recent accounting pronouncements

The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and does not believe the future adoption of any such pronouncements may be expected to cause a material impact on its financial condition or the results of its operations.

On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest—Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this ASU. This ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company elected to early adopt this standard which did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-11, Inventory—Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330). The amendments in this ASU require an entity to measure inventory that is not measured using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) or retail inventory methods at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those years. The Company is evaluating this ASU and has not determined the effect of this standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . Under the new guidance, lessees will be required recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: 1) A lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and 2) A right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The new lease guidance simplified the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessees will no longer be provided with a source of off-balance sheet financing. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those years. The Company is evaluating this ASU and has not determined the effect of this standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

ITEM 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The consolidated financial statements and the Report of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm thereon are filed pursuant to this Item 8 and are included in this report beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

ITEM 9A.   Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this report, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and concluded that (i) there continue to be material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, that the weaknesses constitute a “deficiency” and that this deficiency could result in misstatements of the foregoing accounts and disclosures that could result in a material misstatement to the financial statements for the period covered by this report that would not be detected, and (ii) accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2015.

However, it should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Management's Annual Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the assets of the Company that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control over financial reporting will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.

As of December 31, 2015, management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board of Directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; and (3) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of December 31, 2015.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2) and (3) above did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board of Directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management's report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.   Other Information.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.   Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Set forth below are the present directors and executive officers of the Company. Note that there are no other persons who have been nominated or chosen to become directors nor are there any other persons who have been chosen to become executive officers. There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the directors, officers and other persons pursuant to which such person was selected as a director or an officer. Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and have qualified. Officers are appointed to serve until the meeting of the board of directors following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.

Set forth below are the directors of Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Co. Ltd. (“Golden Corridor”)

Golden Corridor currently does not have any other executives or employees.

Biographies

Set forth below are brief accounts of the business experience during the past five years of each director, executive officer and significant employee of the Company, and each of the directors of Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Co. Ltd.

Lim Yew Chuan, age 67, a Malaysian, joined us on February 18, 2016, as our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director. He has been working as an independent business and system consultant out of Malaysia since his last position in 2011 as Senior Vice President of Systems in Interpay International Group Limited, a subsidiary of Cardtrend International Inc., a Nevada incorporated company, involving in payment systems. He possesses of over 40 years of business experience in South East Asia with 13 years in the payment industry in Asian countries. Prior to joining iSynergy Sdn. Bhd., a payment company in Malaysia issuing MasterCard payment cards, where he worked as the Vice President of Systems between 1998 to 2008, Mr. Lim worked as a dealer representative of AmSteel Securities Sdn. Bhd., a large stock broking company in Malaysia in the mid-90s, handling mainly corporate clients. Prior to this, Mr. Lim worked as the manager of a company in Malaysia since 1975, dealing in trading of hardware materials for construction and engineering industries. Mr. Lim holds a B.Sc. Degree in Mathematics & Computing from the University of North London, London, UK, where he graduated in 1974. Mr. Lim speaks and writes English and Malay.

Kao Wei-Chen (aka Kao Hsuan-Ying), age 59, Taiwanese, has served as a director and the Chairwoman of the Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Co. Ltd. since its inception on August 14, 2013. During 1977 to 1985, Ms. Kao served as the CEO of Taichung Jiyuan Enterprise in Taichung, Taiwan. As the CEO of Taichung Jiyuan Enterprise, she led a team in developing and building the company's business of wholesaling of imported household general and electrical goods. At the end of 1985, Ms. Kao was appointed as the CEO of Thailand Cai Hong Co. Ltd.., an import/export private limited company incorporated in Bangkok, Thailand. She left Thailand Cai Hong Co. Ltd. in 1995 and became an executive director of Thailand Luxury Living International Pte. Ltd., a direct marketing company in Bangkok selling spa and health products. In 2008, Ms. Kao resigned from Thailand Luxury Living International Pte. Ltd. and formed her own trading company, S.I. Global Limited, a private limited company incorporated in Hong Kong, dealing in consumer health products. Ms. Kao has been investing in properties in South-east Asian countries since 1995 and owns several properties in Taiwan, Thailand and Malaysia. Ms. Kao graduated with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in 1976 from Taiwan’s National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, majoring in history. We believe that Ms. Kao’s business experience and familiarity with the business environment in Asia is beneficial to the property development business of Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Co. Ltd. in Cambodia.

Chen Wei Nian, age 19, Cambodian, serves as a non-executive director of Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Co. Ltd. from December 1, 2014. Mr. Chen is the Sales & Marketing Manager of Huione Co. Ltd., a private limited company in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, trading in building materials. Prior to joining Huione Co. Ltd., Mr. Chen was the Executive Manager of HungHao Construction Co. Ltd., a construction company in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Mr. Chen attended Houma High School in Phnom Penh, Cambodia from 2011 to 2013. We believe that Mr. Chen’s experience and familiarity with the building and construction industry qualify him to serve as a director of Golden Corridor.

Chen Yi Jun, age 20, Cambodian, serves as a non-executive director of Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Company from December 1, 2014. Ms. Chen was a piano teacher from 2013 to 2014 at Ars Nova Music Centre, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Following her resignation from her piano teaching job in 2014, Ms. Chen was a customer sales consultant in an electrical home appliances retailer in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Ms. Chen is an accountant in a car repair company in Phnom Penh. She obtained a high school diploma in 2012 from Houma High School in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. In 2014, Ms. Chen obtained a Diploma in Business from Raffles International College, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, In 2014 Ms. Chen is proficient in Khmer, Chinese and English. She possesses computer skills in Microsoft Word, PowerPoint and Excel. We believe that Ms. Chen’s familiarity with Golden Corridor and general business experience qualify her to serve as a director of Golden Corridor.

Family Relationships.  

Ms. Chou Pei-Chi, Ms. Chou Pei-Ying and Mr. Chou Feng-Kai are siblings and shareholders of the company. They are also children of Ms. Kao Wei-Chen (aka Kao Hsuan-Ying), the director and Chairperson of Golden Corridor. Except as set forth above, there are no other family relationships between the directors and executive officers of the Company and Golden Corridor, and there are no family relationships between the directors and executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries, as well as between the directors of the Company’s subsidiaries and Golden Corridor.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

No executive officer or director has been involved in the last ten years in any of the following:

Board Committees and Audit Committee Financial Expert

We do not currently have a standing audit, nominating or compensation committee of the board of directors, or any committee performing similar functions. Our board of directors performs the functions of audit, nominating and compensation committees. As of the date of this prospectus, no member of our board of directors qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act. We hope to attract a director who qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as we commence business operations.

Director Nominations

As of December 31, 2015, we did not affect any material changes to the procedures by which our shareholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors. We have not established formal procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company’s board of directors.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with copies of those filings. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that these persons have complied with all applicable filing requirements during fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, except as set forth below: Kao Hsuan-Ying (aka Kao Wei-Chen) has not yet filed her Form 3 and Schedule 13D and Ms. Chou Pei-Chi, Ms. Chou Pei-Ying and Mr. Chou Feng-Kai have not yet filed their Schedule 13D’s.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors, officers, and employees. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is filed as Exhibit 14 to this annual report and may be obtained free of charge by contacting us at the address or telephone number listed on the cover page hereof.

ITEM 11.  Executive Compensation.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Our compensation program currently consists of cash compensation for the services provided. The compensation program objectives are to attract, motivate and retain the qualified executives that help ensure our future success, to provide incentives for increasing our profits by awarding executives when corporate goals are achieved and to align the interests of executives and long-term stockholders. The compensation package of our named executive officers consists of two main elements:

Base Salary

Our base salary structure is designed to encourage internal growth, attract and retain new talent, and reward strong leadership that will sustain our growth and profitability. The base salary for each named executive officer will reflect our past and current operating profits, the named executive officer’s individual contribution to our success throughout his career, internal pay equity and informal market data regarding comparable positions within similarly situated companies. In determining and setting base salary, we consider all of these factors, though it does not assign specific weights to any factor. We generally review the base salary for each named executive officer on an annual basis. For each of our named executive officers, we review base salary data internally obtained by the Company for comparable executive positions in similarly situated companies to ensure that the base salary rate for each executive is competitive relative to the market.

Discretionary Bonus

The objectives of our bonus awards are to encourage and reward our employees, including the named executive officers, who contribute to and participate in our success by their ability, industry, leadership, loyalty or exceptional service and to recruit additional executives who will contribute to that success.

Our named executive officers are eligible for consideration for a discretionary cash bonus. The Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations regarding bonus awards for the named executive officers and the board of directors provides the bonus recommendation for the Chief Executive Officer. However, the board has sole and final authority and discretion in designating to whom awards are made, the size of the award, if any, and its terms and conditions. The bonus recommendation for each of the named executive officers depends on a number of factors, including (i) the performance of the Company for the year, (ii) the satisfaction of certain individual and corporate performance measures, and (iii) other factors which the board may deem relevant. The Company did not award any cash bonuses during fiscal year 2015.

Equity Compensation

We recognize the importance of having a portion of the named executive officers’ compensation be paid in the form of equity, to help align the executives’ interests with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. At this point, however, we have chosen to emphasize the cash-based portion of our compensation program over a stock program because we believe the discretionary nature of the cash-based compensation gives us the needed flexibility to factor in and reward the attainment of longer-term goals for the Company and the executives, as the board deems appropriate.

The entire board of directors performs the functions that would be performed by a compensation committee. All of the directors participate in deliberations concerning the compensation paid to executive officers. The directors determine the compensation of the Company’s executives by assessing the value of each of its executives and collectively determine the amount of compensation required to retain the services of the company’s executives. We base the amount of compensation for our executives on negotiations between us and the executive. We did not perform any formal third party benchmarking or other market analysis with respect to the amount of such executive’s compensation.

In approving compensation necessary to attract and retain our present executive officers, the board of directors concluded that the salary provided to our executive officer is reasonable considering our financial condition and the stage of development of our business. The objective of the compensation plan is to provide our executives with competitive remuneration for their skills such that we can retain our personnel for an extended period of time. As our operations mature and if our revenue permits, we expect that the specific direction, emphasis and components of our executive compensation programs will continue to evolve. Factors that may influence our decision to change our compensation policies include general market conditions, our future revenue growth and profitability, the implementation of our business plan and strategy and increasing complexity of our business.

Compensation Related Risks

Our board of directors reviewed our compensation policies and practices and determined that our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Summary Compensation Table  

The following summary compensation table sets forth the aggregate compensation we paid or accrued during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 to (i) our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer), (ii) our two most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers on December 31, 2015 whose total compensation was in excess of $100,000, and (iii) up to two additional individuals who would have been within the two-other-most-highly compensated but were not serving as executive officers on December 31, 2015.

 __________________________

Narrative disclosure to Summary Compensation

There are currently no employment agreements or other contracts or arrangements with our officers or directors. There are no compensation plans or arrangements, including payments to be made by us, with respect to our officers, directors or consultants that would result from the resignation, retirement or any other termination of any of our directors, officers or consultants. There are no compensation plans or arrangements for our directors, officers, employees or consultants that would result from a change-in-control.

Equity Awards

There are no unvested options, warrants or convertible securities outstanding.

At no time during the last fiscal year with respect to any of any of our executive officers was there:

Compensation of Directors

During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, we did not provide compensation to any of our directors for serving as our director. We currently have no formal plan for compensating our directors for their services in their capacity as directors, although we may elect to issue stock options to such persons from time to time. Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors. Our board of directors may award special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Our board of directors is comprised of Lim Yew Chuan, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary. The entire board of directors performs the functions that would be performed by a compensation committee. All of the directors participate in deliberations concerning the compensation paid to executive officers.

Compensation Committee Report

Our board of directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this report with management. Based on its review and discussion with management, the board of directors recommended that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The material in this report is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made on, before, or after the date of this Report on Form 10-K and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Submitted by the board of directors:

Lim Yew Chuan

ITEM 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth, as of April 11, 2016, certain information with regard to the record and beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by (i) each person known to the Company to be the record or beneficial owner of 5% or more of the Company’s common stock, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) each of the named executive officers, and (iv) all executive officers and directors of the Company as a group:

ITEM 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Other than as disclosed below, there are no transactions during our two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, or any currently proposed transaction, in which our Company was or to be a participant and the amount exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our Company’s total assets at year end for our last two completed years, and in which any of our directors, officers or principal stockholders, or any other related person as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K, had or have any direct or indirect material interest.

From time to time, our directors and shareholders advance funds to the Company on an unsecured, non-interest bearing basis, which funds are due on demand. As of December 31, 2015, Vincent Kim, our previous Director and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary advanced $189,063 , all of which is outstanding.

We have not adopted policies or procedures for approval of related person transactions but review them on a case-by-case basis. We believe that all related party transactions were on terms at least as favorable as we would have secured in arm’s-length transactions with third parties. Except as set forth above, we have not entered into any material transactions with any director, executive officer, and promoter, beneficial owner of five percent or more of our common stock, or family members of such persons.

Director Independence

Our board of directors currently consists of Lim Yew Chuan, our sole executive officer, who does not qualify as an independent director under the published listing requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market or the NYSE. As of the date hereof, we have not adopted a standard of independence nor do we have a policy with respect to independence requirements for our board members or that a majority of our board be comprised of “independent directors.”

ITEM 14.   Principal AccountING Fees And Services.

HKCMCPA Company Limited (“HKCMCPA”) audited our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

All audit work was performed by the full time employees of HKCMCPA for the above mentioned fiscal years. Our board of directors does not have an audit committee. The functions customarily delegated to an audit committee are performed by our full board of directors. Our board of directors approves in advance, all services performed by HKCMCPA. Our board of directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence, and has approved such services.

The following table sets forth fees billed by our auditors during the last two fiscal years for services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements, services by our auditors that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and that are not reported as audit fees, services rendered in connection with tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, and all other fees for services rendered.

PART IV

ITEM 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

Financial Statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

No financial statement schedules are included because such schedules are not applicable, are not required, or because required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

* Filed herewith.

(1) Filed as an Exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2012.

(3) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 10, 2014.

(4) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange on October 23, 2013.

(5) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2, 2014.

(6) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2014.

(7) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2015.

(8) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2015.

(9) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 14 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2014.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

GOLD UNION INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and stockholders of

Gold Union Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Gold Union Inc. (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 (restated) and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in equity for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (restated). These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred substantial losses this year, all of which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ HKCMCPA Company Limited

HKCMCPA Company Limited

Certified Public Accountants

Hong Kong, China

April 14, 2016

GOLD UNION INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

(Currency expressed in United States Dollars (“US$”), except for number of shares)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

GOLD UNION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

(Currency expressed in United States Dollars (“US$”), except for number of shares)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

GOLD UNION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

(Currency expressed in United States Dollars (“US$”))

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

GOLD UNION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

(Currency expressed in United States Dollars (“US$”), except for number of shares)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

GOLD UNION INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 AND 2014

(Currency expressed in United States Dollars (“US$”), except for number of shares)

Gold Union Inc. (formerly “Advanced Ventures Corp.”, or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on July 6, 2010. The Company has revised its business plan to trade in precious metal bullion primarily in the Asia Pacific region.

Effective January 6, 2015, Advanced Ventures Corp. effected a name change to Gold Union Inc.

On March 27, 2012, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Advanced Ventures (HK) Ltd., under the laws of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“HK SAR”) of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). Advanced Ventures (HK) Ltd. engages in the same line of business as that of the Company. On November 1, 2014 the Company dissolved Advanced Ventures (HK) Ltd. Advanced Ventures (HK) Ltd. which was inactive during its existence.

On July 21, 2014, the Company formed G.U. Asia Limited, a limited company, under the laws of Hong Kong, for the purpose of conducting business in Asia.

On July 31, 2014, the Company formed G.U. International Limited, under the laws of the Republic of Seychelles.

On December 31, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of 48% equity interest in Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Co. Limited (“PPGCT”) in exchange of 2,500,000,000 shares of its common stock. PPGCT was treated as the acquirer for accounting purpose since the original stockholders of PPGCT owned a majority of the shares of the Company’s common stock immediately following the completion of the transaction. PPGCT was the legal acquiree but deemed to be the accounting acquirer. The Company was the legal acquirer but deemed to be the accounting acquire. This transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition under U.S. GAAP. Historical stockholders’ equity of the acquirer prior to the merger are retroactively restated (a recapitalization) for the equivalent number of shares received in the merger. Operations prior to the merger are those of the acquirer. After completion of the transaction, the Company’s consolidated financial statements include the assets and liabilities, the operations and cash flow of the Company and its subsidiaries.

The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

The Company has suffered from continuous losses with an accumulated deficit of $499,478 as of December 31, 2015 and experienced negative cash flows from operations. The continuation of the Company as a going concern through December 31, 2015 is dependent upon the continued financial support from its stockholders. Management believes the Company is currently pursuing additional financing for its operations. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in securing sufficient funds to sustain the operations.

These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets and liabilities that may result in the Company not being able to continue as a going concern.

These accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet and revenues and expenses during the years reported. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GOLU and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and the accounts of PPGCT, which represent substantially all of the Company’s consolidated assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Although the Company legally owns 4% equity interest in PPGCT, there is an effective control of PPGCT by the common shareholders of the Company and PPGCT, and whose financial statements are required to be consolidated. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions were eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost and represent cash on hand, demand deposits placed with banks or other financial institutions and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less as of the purchase date of such investments.

Land under development relating to freehold farmland, is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses, if any. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line basis over the following expected useful lives from the date on which they become fully operational.

Long-lived assets primarily include freehold farmland held for development. In accordance with the provision of ASC Topic 360, “ Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets ”, the Company generally conducts its annual impairment evaluation to its long-lived assets, usually in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist, such as a significant sustained change in the business climate. The recoverability of long-lived assets is measured at the reporting unit level. If the total of the expected undiscounted future net cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and carrying amount of the asset. There has been no impairment charge for the periods presented.

Policy for Capitalizing Development Cost

The cost of land includes the purchase price of property, legal fees and other acquisition costs. Costs directly related to planning, developing, initial leasing and constructing a property are capitalized and classified as Land under Development in the balance sheets. Capitalized development costs include interest, and other direct project costs incurred during the period of development. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, there was no such capitalized interest and capitalized development cost.

A variety of costs are incurred in the acquisition, development and construction of properties. After determination is made to capitalize a cost, it is allocated to the specific component of a project that is benefited. Determination of when a development project is substantially complete and capitalization must cease involves a degree of judgment. The Company adopts the capitalization policy on development properties, which is guided by ASC Topic 835-20 “ Interest – Capitalization of Interest ” and ASC Topic 970 “ Real Estate - General ”. The costs of land and buildings under development include specifically identifiable costs. The capitalized costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, salaries and related costs and other costs incurred during the period of development. The Company considers a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the receipt of certificates of occupancy, but no later than one year from cessation of major construction activity. The Company ceases capitalization on the portion (1) substantially completed and (2) occupied or held available for occupancy, and the Company capitalized only those costs associated with the portion under construction. No cost was capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

The Company calculates net loss per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share.” Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common stock equivalents had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.

There were no potentially outstanding dilutive shares for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and Income-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d) amount due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and does not believe the future adoption of any such pronouncements may be expected to cause a material impact on its financial condition or the results of its operations.

On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest—Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this ASU. This ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company elected to early adopt this standard which did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-11, Inventory—Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330). The amendments in this ASU require an entity to measure inventory that is not measured using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) or retail inventory methods at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those years. The Company is evaluating this ASU and has not determined the effect of this standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . Under the new guidance, lessees will be required recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: 1) A lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and 2) A right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The new lease guidance simplified the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessees will no longer be provided with a source of off-balance sheet financing. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those years. The Company is evaluating this ASU and has not determined the effect of this standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

In September 2013, the Company purchased three pieces of freehold farmland located at Phkang Village, Chbarmorn Commune, Chbarmorn District, Phnom Penh, Cambodia with a total land size of 172,510 meter square. These lands are currently vacant and the Company is actively anticipating the town planning and development application. The Company expects to develop and construct an industrial complex for rental income purpose, which will be completed in the next two to three years, subject to the final approval from the local government.

No depreciation is provided for during the periods presented.

United States of America

Gold Union Inc. is incorporated in the State of Delaware and is subject to United States of America tax law.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company incurred $415,156 of cumulative net operating losses which can be carried forward to offset future taxable income. The net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2035, if unutilized. The Company has provided for a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of $141,153 on the expected future tax benefits from the net operating loss carryforwards as the management believes it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized in the future.

The following table sets forth the significant components of the aggregate deferred tax assets of the Company as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Management believes that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable in the future. Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets of $141,153 as of December 31, 2015. In 2015, the valuation allowance increased by $29,971, primarily relating to net operating loss carryforwards from the local tax regime.

Common Stock

Upon formation the Company issued 45,000,000 shares of its common stock to the Directors and Officers of the Company for $300 in cash.

The Company commenced a capital formation activity by filing a Registration Statement on Form S-1 with the SEC to register and sell in a self-directed offering 37,500,000 shares of its common stock at an offering price of $0.002 per share for gross proceeds of up to $75,000. The Registration Statement was declared effective on May 10, 2011. On September 16, 2011, the Company issued 37,500,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to the Registration Statement for gross proceeds of $75,000. Offering costs of $20,000 related to this capital formation activity were charged against the capital raised.

On December 31, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of 48% equity interest in Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Co. Limited in exchange of 2,500,000,000 shares of its common stock. These 2,500,000,000 shares were subsequently issued to the shareholders of Phnom Penh Golden Corridor Trading Co. Limited.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company had a total of 2,663,134,500 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding.

Advances from Stockholders

From time to time, stockholders and directors of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand. The imputed interest on the loan from director was not significant.

Free Office Space from its Majority Stockholder and Chief Executive Officer

The Company has been provided office space by its majority stockholder at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statements.

In accordance with ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events”, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued, the Company has evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after December 31, 2015 up through the date was the Company issued the audited financial statements. During the period, the Company did not have any material recognizable subsequent events.