North America Frac Sand, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2014 September (Form 10-Q)

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from __________ to __________.

Commission file number 333-175692

Xterra Building Systems, Inc.

fka Innovate Building Systems, Inc.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Florida

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

20-8926549

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7830 Inishmore Dr. Indianapolis, IN 46214

 (Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (317) 652-3077

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes   ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ Yes    x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x.

The number of shares of the issuer’s common stock, par value $.00001 per share, outstanding as of November 10, 2014 was 78,545,000.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements.

See notes to unaudited financial statements 

See notes to unaudited financial statements

 See notes to unaudited financial statements

NOTE 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS

The Company was incorporated in the State of Indiana as a for-profit Company on April 26, 2007. On June 26, 2012 the Company changed its domicile to the State of Florida. The Company was formed to provide consultation to the aquatic farming industry. The Company will provide consolidation opportunities for on-going and start-up aquatic farming operations. The Company’s approach will be to assist aquatic farming operations with the organizational structure, customer service and marketing aspects of their business, allowing our customers to focus on the business aspects of operating the farms.

The Company is headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these condensed financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 and notes thereto and other pertinent information contained in our Form 10-K the Company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

The results of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $nil and $712, respectively.

CASH FLOWS REPORTING

The Company follows ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company’s balance sheet includes certain financial instruments, including accounts payable, and amounts due to related party. The carrying amounts of current assets and current liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization.

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2014. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company has not had significant revenues from operations. The Company follows ASC 605-, Revenue Recognition-The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES AND VALUATION ALLOWANCE

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740 “Income Taxes.” Under the asset and liability method of FASB ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under FASB ASC 740, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations. No deferred tax assets or liabilities were recognized as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

SHARE-BASED EXPENSE

ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all share-based payment transactions in which employee services are acquired. Transactions include incurring liabilities, or issuing or offering to issue shares, options, and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation rights.Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50, Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees. Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees is based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable: (a) the goods or services received; or (b) the equity instruments issued. The fair value of the share-based payment transaction is determined at the earlier of performance commitment date or performance completion date.

Share-based expense for the periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were$-0- and $-0-, respectively.

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Net income (loss) per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share.” The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period is used to compute basic earning or loss per share. Diluted earnings or loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares and diluted potential common shares outstanding. Dilutive potential common shares are additional common shares assumed to be exercised.

Basic net income (loss) per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding at September 30, 2014. As of September 30, 2014, the Company had no dilutive potential common shares.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, which eliminated certain financial reporting requirements of companies previously identified as “Development Stage Entities” (Topic 915). The amendments in this ASU simplify accounting guidance by removing all incremental financial reporting requirements for development stage entities. The amendments also reduce data maintenance and, for those entities subject to audit, audit costs by eliminating the requirement for development stage entities to present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity. Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Upon adoption, entities will no longer present or disclose any information required by Topic 915. The Company has adopted this standard.

In May 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The revenue recognition standard affects all entities that have contracts with customers, except for certain items. The new revenue recognition standard eliminates the transaction-and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP and replaces it with a principle-based approach for determining revenue recognition. Public entities are required to adopt the revenue recognition standard for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Early adoption is not permitted for public entities. The Company has reviewed the applicable ASU and has not, at the current time, quantified the effects of this pronouncement, however it believes that there will be no material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12 Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. A performance target in a share-based payment that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be accounted for as a performance condition under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. As a result, the target is not reflected in the estimation of the award’s grant date fair value. Compensation cost would be recognized over the required service period, if it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after 15 December 2015 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. Management has reviewed the ASU and believes that they currently account for these awards in a manner consistent with the new guidance, therefore there is no anticipation of any effect to the consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014,FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-15 Preparation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. If and when an entity’s liquidation becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting in accordance with Subtopic 205-30, Presentation of Financial Statements—Liquidation Basis of Accounting. Even when an entity’s liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. In those situations, financial statements should continue to be prepared under the going concern basis of accounting, but the amendments in this Update should be followed to determine whether to disclose information about the relevant conditions and events. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company will evaluate the going concern considerations in this ASU, however, at the current period, management does not believe that it has met conditions which would subject these financial statements for additional disclosure.

We have reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and does not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the corporation’s reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration.

NOTE 3. GOING CONCERN

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating cost and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plan to obtain such resources for the Company include, obtaining capital from management and significant stockholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses. However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain sufficient additional funds when needed or that such funds, if available, will be obtainable on terms satisfactory to the Company. In addition, profitability will ultimately depend upon the level of revenues received from business operations. However, there is no assurance that the Company will attain profitability. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern

NOTE 4. INCOME TAXES

At September 30, 2014, the Company had a net operating loss carry–forward for Federal income tax purposes of $30,910,681 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2031. No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements because the Company believes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets of approximately $10,509,632, calculated at an effective tax rate of 34%, was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are fully offset by a valuation allowance of $10,509,632.

Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realizability.

The Company has open tax periods, subject to IRS audit for the years 2009 through 2013.

NOTE 5. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

COMMON STOCK

The Company has been authorized to issue 10,000,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.00001 par value. Each share of issued and outstanding common stock shall entitle the holder thereof to fully participate in all shareholder meetings, to cast one vote on each matter with respect to which shareholders have the right to vote, and to share ratably in all dividends and other distributions declared and paid with respect to common stock, as well as in the net assets of the corporation upon liquidation or dissolution.

The Company effected a 1 to 50,000 reverse stock split, declared effective on December 28, 2012 by FINRA. All shares and per shares presented have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.

On December 4, 2013 the Company issued 29,743,712 shares of restricted common stock to Davisson and Associates escrow to facilitate an anticipated acquisition. The shares have been issued in certificate form in trust. In the event that the acquisition is not consummated, the shares will be returned into escrow, less fees incurred. There has been no expense or change in control recognized. We anticipate the completion of the acquisition in subsequent period.

During the month of December the Company allowed several non-related parties to convert a total of 21 shares of Series B Preferred stock into 5,250,000 unrestricted shares of common stock. The conversion rate was done at par, $0.00001 according to the stated articles of designation.

During the August of 2014, the Company allowed several non-related parties to convert a total of 515 shares of Series B Preferred stock into 51,505,000 unrestricted shares of common stock. The conversion rate was recorded at the conversion rates according to the stated articles of designation. The Company recognized the beneficial conversion of the preferred stock into common stock, calculated by the conversion factor of59.5% (the exchange ratio) of the market value of the Company prior to the conversion, in accordance with Auditing Standard 805-10, resulting in the recognition of $10,218,592 expense for the conversion.

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 there were 86,545,000 and 35,040,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.

PREFERRED STOCK

The Company has been authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of $0.00001 par value Preferred Stock. The Board of Directors is expressly vested with the authority to divide any or all of the Preferred Stock into series and to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of the shares of each series so established, within certain guidelines established in the Articles of Incorporation.

Series A: The certificate of designations for the Preferred A Stock provides that as a class it possesses a number of votes equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of all votes of capital stock of the Company that could be asserted in any matter put to a vote of the shareholders of the Company.

Series B: The certificate of designation for the Preferred B Stock provides that as a class shall be entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock shall be convertible, at any time, and/or from time to time, into the number of shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, equal to the price of the Series B Preferred Stock, divided by the par value of the Common Stock, subject to adjustment as may be determined by the Board of Directors from time to time (the “Conversion Rate”).

On November 5, 2013 the Company cancelled 8,000 shares of Series B Preferred stock from a non-related party for non-performance of a contract.

During the month of December the Company allowed several non-related parties to convert a total of 21 shares of Series B Preferred stock into 5,250,000 unrestricted shares of common stock. The conversion rate was done at par, $0.00001 according to the stated articles of designation.

During August of 2014, the Company allowed several non-related parties to convert a total of 515 shares of Series B Preferred stock into 51,505,000 unrestricted shares of common stock. The conversion rate was done at par, $0.00001 according to the stated articles of designation

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 there was 1 share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 there were 76,133 and 76,648 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, respectively. The holders of the preferred shares, series B have waived their right of conversion until such time that the Board of Directors approves such conversions, in consideration of shares authorized.

OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

There are no warrants or options outstanding to acquire any additional shares of common stock of the Company.

NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

The Company issued 100 shares to David Cupp, CEO and sole Director on September 30, 2007 at a par value of $500 in exchange for incorporation services.

The Company issued 146 shares to David Cupp, CEO and sole Director on September 22, 2008 for cash at a par value of $730 or $0.00001 per share.

On July 3, 2012, the Company issued to David R. Cupp one share of our Class A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred A Stock”) and 40,000 shares of our Common Stock. Mr. Cupp was issued the common stock and the Preferred A Stock in connection with and as consideration for his agreement to continue as an officer and director for the Company.

On June 16, 2014, the Company had a change in control of the majority shares. In agreement, the shareholders forgave $27,641 of accounts payable and other debts due. The Company recognized the forgiveness as a contribution to capital.

OTHER

The Company’s officer and directors are involved in other businessactivities and may, in the future, become involved in other businessopportunities that become available. They may face a conflict in selectingbetween the Company and other business interests. The Company has not formulateda policy for the resolution of such conflicts.

The Company does not own or lease property or lease office space. The Company has been provided office space by a member of the Board of Directors at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statements.

During the nine month period one of the Directors has advanced $3,590 to the Company and has incurred $3,000 of consulting fees for a total indebtedness to the Director of $6,590.

The above amountsare not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent parties.

NOTE 7. NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable consisted of the following as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

NOTE 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time the Company may be a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. Management believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On September 15, 2014, Xterra Building Systems, Inc. f/k/a Innovate Building Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation (the “Amendment”) to change its name from “Innovate Building Systems, Inc.” to “Xterra Building Systems, Inc.” (the “Name Change”). The Amendment was effective in the State of Florida as of September 15, 2014 and received FINRA approval on September 30, 2014. The financial statements retroactively present the new name of the entity.

Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued, considered to be the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that there are no additional subsequent events to disclose.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations

Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements.

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Xterra Building Systems, Inc. f/k/a Innovate Building Systems, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2014 contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. To the extent that such statements are not recitations of historical fact, such statements constitute forward-looking statements which, by definition, involve risks and uncertainties. In particular, statements under the Sections; Description of Business, Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation contain forward-looking statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, the Company expresses an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the statement of expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished.

Our Business Overview

Xterra Building Systems, Inc. f/k/a Innovate Building Systems, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), provides marketing of consulting services primarily to independent aquatic farming operators and other market participants located in the Midwest of the United States of America (the “U.S.”). Historically, we conducted initial marketing and sales activities to take advantage of opportunities related to time, location and quality of aquatic farming operations. We have conducted our operations primarily in Indiana.

On May 1, 2014, the Company entered into a share purchase agreement with Innovate Building Systems, Inc., an Alberta corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Innovate”. On June 4, 2014, this agreement was cancelled and replaced by a new share purchase agreement. Under the terms of the share purchase agreement the Company would acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Innovate in exchange for 73,000,000 shares of the Company (the “Agreement”). The completion of the Agreement is subject to completion of an audit of Innovate and the issuance of an unqualified audit report and certificate that the company has no judgments against it. Consequently the Company changed its name to Innovate Building Systems, Inc.

Innovate is a privately owned Alberta company engaged in the sale, manufacture and installation of modular buildings. Modular buildings are manufactured in Innovate’s manufacturing plant in Edmonton, Alberta (30,000 square feet) or its manufacturing plant in Vegreville, Alberta (100,000 square feet). Innovate manufactures modular building designed for specifications provided by its customers. To date, most of its customers use the modular buildings as housing and social facilities for their employees, employed in remote locations in Northern Alberta and British Columbia in the resource extraction business. Innovate has employed up to 120 employees.

During the audit, previously undisclosed material items were disclosed, consequently, on August 27, 2014, the Company terminated its share purchase agreement with Innovate.

Our plan of operation for the next twelve months will be to expand our client base. We daily market our consulting services to small and medium size businesses that are focused on the aquaculture industry. We are also continually looking for new business opportunities to invest in. As we continue to grow we will need to raise additional funds. We do anticipate obtaining additional financing to fund operations through common stock offerings, to the extent available, or to obtain additional financing to the extent necessary to augment our working capital. The Company does intend to continue to use the income from our current client to continue to meet our operating expenses. We do not have need for the purchase of any property or equipment at this time. The Company will not have any significant changes in the current number of employees.

In addition, our Plan of Operation for the next twelve months is to raise capital to continue to expand our operations. Although we are not presently engaged in any capital raising activities, we anticipate that we may engage in one or more private offering of our company’s securities after the completion of this offering. We would most likely rely upon the transaction exemptions from registration provided by Regulation D, Rule 506 or conduct another private offering under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. See “Note 2 – Going Concern” in our financial statements for additional information as to the possibility that we may not be able to continue as a “going concern.”

12 Month Growth Strategy and Milestones

While a strategic and wisely executed marketing campaign is the key to expanding our customer base; providing new, cutting-edge, innovative ideas will ensure a solid operation built for long-term success.

The Company planned the milestones over the next twelve months:

Any need for outside services in which we cannot provide will all be initially outsourced in order to cut costs by not having facilities in excess of our needs. The company will not attempt to establish relationships with providers of outsourcing services until the company will be able to utilize such services.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our condensed financial statements in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make certain estimates and apply judgments. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be important at the time the condensed financial statements are prepared. Due to the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain, materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. On a regular basis, we review our critical accounting policies and how they are applied in the preparation of our condensed financial statements.

While we believe that the historical experience, current trends and other factors considered support the preparation of our condensed financial statements in conformity with GAAP, actual results could differ from our estimates and such differences could be material.

For a full description of our critical accounting policies, please refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Results of Operations for three and ninemonths ended September 30, 2014and September 30, 2013

Revenues

Total Revenue. Total revenues for the three and ninemonths endedSeptember 30, 2014 and 2013 were both $-0-, respectively.

Expenses

Total Expenses.Total operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were $17,551, $395, $29,891 and $67,234, respectively. Total expenses consisted of professional fees of $17,551, $349, $29,801 and $67,649 for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2014 and 20143, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $0, $46, $90 and $(415), for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2014 and 20143, respectively.The change was due to consulting contracts that were fulfilled and expensed during the period ending September 30, 2014.During the quarter ended, September 30, 2014, the Company issued 51,505,000 shares from the conversion of 515 preferred shares. Fair market value of these shares was $0.49per share, resulting in marketing capitalization of $17,169,600. The Company valued the converted shares using the exchange ratio (59.5%), resulting in recognition of expense in the amount of $10218,592 as the benefit from the conversion of preferred shares to common shares.

Financial Condition

Total Assets. Total assets at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013were $Nil and $712, respectively. Total assets consist of cash. The change was due to banking fees.

Total Liabilities. Total liabilities at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $17,551 and $16,013, respectively. Total liabilities consist of accounts payable of $13,961 and $12,913, notes payable of $0 and $3,000 and a note payable to a director of $3,590 and $100, respectively.

Liquidity

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.

The Company sustained a net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 of $10,248,483 and $67,234, respectively. Because of the absence of positive cash flows from operations, the Company will require additional funding for continuing the development and marketing of products. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

We are presently not able to meet our obligations as they come due. At September 30, 2014 we had working capital deficit of $17,551. Our working capital is due to the results of operations.

Net cash from (used in) operating activities for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2014 and 2013 was $(1,202) and $(9,101), respectively. Net cash used in operating activities includes our net loss and changes in working capital components, such as accounts payable.

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $490 and $-0-, respectively.

We anticipate that our future liquidity requirements will arise from the need to fund our growth from operations, pay current obligations and future capital expenditures. The primary sources of funding for such requirements are expected to be cash generated from operations and raising additional funds from the private sources and/or debt financing. However, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and/or obtain additional financing on terms satisfactory to us, if at all, to remain a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations on a timely basis and ultimately to attain profitability. Our Plan of Operation for the next twelve months is to raise capital to continue to expand our operations. Although we are not presently engaged in any capital raising activities, we anticipate that we may engage in one or more private offering of our company’s securities after the completion of this offering. We would most likely rely upon the transaction exemptions from registration provided by Regulation D, Rule 506 or conduct another private offering under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. See “Note 3 – Going Concern” in our financial statements for additional information as to the possibility that we may not be able to continue as a “going concern.”

We have no known demands or commitments and are not aware of any events or uncertainties that will result in or that are reasonably likely to materially increase or decrease our current liquidity.

We are not aware of any trends or known demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that will result in or that are reasonably likely to result in material increases or decreases in liquidity.

Capital Resources.

We had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of September 30, 2014.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have made no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are a Smaller Reporting Company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Management’s Conclusions Regarding Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

With respect to the period ending September 30, 2014, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Based upon our evaluation regarding the period ending September 30, 2014, the Company’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the Company’s limited internal resources and lack of ability to have multiple levels of transaction review. Material weaknesses noted are lack of an audit committee, lack of a majority of outside directors on the board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and management is dominated by two individuals, without adequate compensating controls. Through the use of external consultants and the review process, management believes that the financial statements and other information presented herewith are materially correct.

The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. However, the Company’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefit of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period ended September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

For a full discussion of controls and procedures refer to Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10K.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We are a Smaller Reporting Company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

During the period ending September 30, 2014, the Company did not issue any unregistered shares of its common stock.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Key

SIGNATURES

 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

XTERRA BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. F/K/A INNOVATE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.

21