Nova Lifestyle, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 December (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010
|
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number: 333-163019
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
75-3250686
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
No. 6, JieFangNan Lu, HeXi District, TianJin, China
|
300000
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(86) 22-25763415
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
|
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES x NO ¨
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
As of February 10, 2011, the registrant had 2,596,000 shares of common stock, $.001 par value, issued and outstanding.
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
|
|||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||
Item 1.
|
3
|
||
Item 2.
|
12
|
||
Item 3.
|
14
|
||
Item 4.
|
14
|
||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||
Item 1.
|
15
|
||
Item 1A.
|
15
|
||
Item 2.
|
15
|
||
Item 3.
|
15
|
||
Item 5.
|
15
|
||
Item 6.
|
15
|
||
16
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2010
|
September 30, 2010
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash & equivalents
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts payable & accrued liabilities
|
$ | 16,722 | $ | 12,520 | ||||
Total current liabilities
|
16,722 | 12,520 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized;
|
||||||||
2,596,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and
|
||||||||
September 30, 2010, respectively
|
2,596 | 2,596 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital
|
13,144 | 13,144 | ||||||
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage
|
(32,462 | ) | (28,260 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' deficit
|
(16,722 | ) | (12,520 | ) | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
$ | - | $ | - |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF EXPENSES
(Unaudited)
From September 9, 2009
|
||||||||
Three months ended
|
(inception) through
|
|||||||
December 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2010
|
|||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||
General and administrative
|
$ | 702 | $ | 4,843 | ||||
Professional fees
|
3,500 | 27,619 | ||||||
Total Expenses
|
4,202 | 32,462 | ||||||
Net loss
|
$ | 4,202 | $ | 32,462 | ||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
2,596,000 | |||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
$ | (0.01 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Period from
September 9, 2009
|
||||||||
Three months ended
|
(inception) through
|
|||||||
December 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2010
|
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (4,202 | ) | $ | (32,462 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
|
||||||||
Common stock issued for services
|
- | 2,000 | ||||||
Changes in
|
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
4,202 | 16,722 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities
|
- | (13,740 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Purchase and cancellation of treasury stock
|
- | (540 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
- | 14,280 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
- | 13,740 | ||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH & EQUIVALENTS
|
- | - | ||||||
CASH & EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
- | - | ||||||
CASH & EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Supplemental Cash flow data:
|
||||||||
Income tax paid
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Interest paid
|
$ | - | $ | - |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
From September 9, 2009 (Inception) to December 31, 2010
Deficit Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock
|
Additional
|
During the
|
||||||||||||||||||
Numbers of shares
|
Amount
|
Paid in capital
|
exploration stage |
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 9, 2009 (Inception)
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||
Common stock issued for cash, September 28, 2009
|
2,000,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | - | 4,000 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for services, September 28, 2009
|
100,000 | 100 | 1,900 | - | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||
Net loss
|
- | - | - | (525 | ) | (525 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
2,100,000 | 2,100 | 3,900 | (525 | ) | 5,475 | ||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for cash at $0.02, January 13, 2010
|
514,000 | 514 | 9,766 | - | 10,280 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase and cancellation of common stock at $0.03 per share
|
(18,000 | ) | (18 | ) | (522 | ) | - | (540 | ) | |||||||||||
Net loss for the year
|
- | - | - | (27,735 | ) | (27,735 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
2,596,000 | 2,596 | 13,144 | (28,260 | ) | (12,520 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net loss for period
|
- | - | - | (4,202 | ) | (4,202 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 (unaudited)
|
2,596,000 | $ | 2,596 | $ | 13,144 | $ | (32,462 | ) | $ | (16,722 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Stevens Resources, Inc. (the “Company” or “Stevens Resources”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 9, 2009. The Company currently has no operations and, in accordance with ASC 915 “Development Stage Entities,” is considered an Exploration Stage Enterprise. The Company has been in the exploration stage since its formation and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the three months ended December 31, 2010, and for all periods presented were made.
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Cash
For the Statements of Cash Flows, all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that were included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” (“FIN 48”), codified in FASB ASC Topic 740, on September 9, 2009. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company made a comprehensive review of its portfolio of tax positions in accordance with recognition standards established by FIN 48. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized no material adjustments to liabilities or stockholders’ equity. When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as interest expense and penalties are classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of income. At December 31, 2010, the Company did not take any uncertain positions that would necessitate recording of tax related liability.
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
Basic and Diluted Loss per Share (EPS)
Basic EPS (Loss) is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed similarly to basic net income (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted EPS is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” codified in FASB ASC Financial Instruments, Topic 825, requires the Company disclose estimated fair values of financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the statements of financial position for current liabilities qualifying as financial instruments are a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Fair Value Measurements
On September 9, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” codified in FASB ASC Financial Instruments, Topic 820. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosures requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows:
·
|
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
|
·
|
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
|
·
|
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Company did not identify any assets and liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value.
Share-Based Expenses
ASC 718 "Compensation - Stock Compensation," codified in SFAS No. 123R, prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all stock-based payments awarded to employees, including employee stock options, restricted stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation rights, which may be classified as either equity or liabilities. The Company should determine if a present obligation to settle the share-based payment transaction in cash or other assets exists. A present obligation to settle in cash or other assets exists if: (a) the option to settle by issuing equity instruments lacks commercial substance or (b) the present obligation is implied because of an entity's past practices or stated policies. If a present obligation exists, the transaction should be recognized as a liability; otherwise, the transaction should be recognized as equity.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50 "Equity - Based Payments to Non-Employees," which codified SFAS 123R and the Emerging Issues Task Force consensus in Issue No. 96-18 ("EITF 96-18"), "Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services." Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable: (a) the goods or services received; or (b) the equity instruments issued. The fair value of the share-based payment transaction should be determined at the earlier of performance commitment date or performance completion date.
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
Going Concern
The Company's financial statements are prepared using US GAAP applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.
In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management's plans to obtain such resources for the Company include (1) obtaining capital from management and significant stockholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses, and (2) as a last resort, seeking out and completing a merger with an existing operating company. However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.
The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company adopted all recently issued accounting pronouncements. The adoption of the accounting pronouncements, including those not yet effective, is not anticipated to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
On September 9, 2009, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-01, “Topic 105 – Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – amendments based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“ASU No. 2009-01”). ASU No. 2009-01 re-defines authoritative US GAAP for nongovernmental entities to be only comprised of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) and, for SEC registrants, guidance issued by the SEC. The Codification is a reorganization and compilation of all then-existing authoritative US GAAP for nongovernmental entities, except for guidance issued by the SEC. The Codification is amended to effect non-SEC changes to authoritative US GAAP. Adoption of ASU No. 2009-01 only changed the referencing convention of US GAAP in the Notes to the Financial Statements.
On February 25, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 Subsequent Events Topic 855 “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” effective immediately. The amendments in the ASU remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of US GAAP. The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC’s literature. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
On March 5, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11 Derivatives and Hedging Topic 815 “Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.” This ASU clarifies the guidance within the derivative literature that exempts certain credit related features from analysis as potential embedded derivatives requiring separate accounting. The ASU specifies that an embedded credit derivative feature related to the transfer of credit risk that is only in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another is not subject to bifurcation from a host contract under ASC 815-15-25, Derivatives and Hedging – Embedded Derivatives – Recognition. All other embedded credit derivative features should be analyzed to determine whether their economic characteristics and risks are “clearly and closely related” to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and whether bifurcation is required. The ASU was effective for the Company in its fiscal fourth quarter of 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB codified the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 08-09, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition.” FASB ASU No. 2010-17 provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development transactions. FASB ASU No. 2010-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, and is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved after the adoption date. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3 – SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Common stock
The authorized common stock of the Company consists of 75,000,000 shares with par value of $0.001. On September 28, 2009, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock at $0.002 per share for $4,000. The Company also issued 100,000 shares at $0.02 per share for $2,000 in professional services. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had 2,100,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding. On January 13, 2010, the Company filed a Prospectus pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as part of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 deemed effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 12, 2010. Pursuant to the prospectus, the Company sold 514,000 shares at $0.02 per share for $10,280. In June 2010, the Company purchased and cancelled 18,000 common shares at $0.03 per share for $540. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had 2,596,000 shares issued and outstanding.
Share Transfer
Effective July 13, 2010, Mr. Justin Miller, the Company’s former President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and director, entered into an agreement for the sale and purchase of securities of the Company (the “Agreement”) with Mr. Alex Li. In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Agreement, Mr. Miller sold 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, held of record, representing approximately 77.04% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company, to Mr. Li in a private transaction intended to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for $40,000. The shares of common stock are restricted securities. The source of funds used by Mr. Li was personal funds. After giving effect to the Agreement, there was a change in control of the Company.
NOTE 4 – INCOME TAX
The Company does not provide current or deferred U.S. federal income tax provision or benefit for any of the periods presented because the Company has experienced operating losses since inception. Under ACS 740 “Income Taxes,” when it is more likely than not that a tax asset cannot be realized through future income the Company must allow for this future tax benefit. The Company provided a full valuation allowance on the net deferred tax asset, consisting of net operating loss carry forwards, because management has determined that it is more likely than not that we will not earn income sufficient to realize the deferred tax assets during the carry forward period.
The Company has not taken a tax position that, if challenged, would have a material effect on the financial statements for the three months ended December 31, 2010, applicable under ACS 740. As a result of the adoption of ACS 740, we did not recognize any adjustment to the liability for uncertain tax position and therefore did not record any adjustment to the beginning balance of accumulated deficit on the balance sheet.
The components of the Company’s deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Net operating loss carry forward
|
$ | 10,357 | ||
Valuation allowance
|
(10,357 | ) | ||
Net deferred tax asset
|
$ | 0 |
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the 34% statutory rate to the income tax recorded for the three months ended December 31, 2010 is as follows:
Income tax benefit
|
$ | 1,428 | ||
Valuation allowance
|
(1,428 | ) | ||
$ | 0 |
The Company did not pay any income taxes during the three months ended December 31, 2010. The net federal operating loss carry forward will expire in 2030. This carry forward may be limited upon the consummation of a business combination under IRC Section 381.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those listed under the heading “Risk Factors” and those listed in our other SEC filings. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. Throughout this Quarterly Report, we will refer to Stevens Resources, Inc. as “Stevens Resources,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our.”
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Company History
We were incorporated on September 9, 2009 in the State of Nevada, we have no subsidiaries. We have not generated any revenue to date. We commenced our operations as an exploration stage company to explore for mineral properties with a view to exploiting any mineral deposits we discover. We do not hold any investments or interests in mineral properties or real estate, nor do we have any current plans to acquire new investments or interests in mineral properties, but we may consider such acquisitions in the future. We are evaluating other business opportunities as well, which may include a change in control of the Company or business combination with an operating company.
Our auditors issued a going concern opinion on our September 30, 2010 financial statements. This means our auditors believe there is substantial doubt we can continue as an on-going business for the next 12 months. Our auditors’ opinion is based on the uncertainty of our ability to establish profitable operations. The opinion results from the fact that we have not generated any revenues. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other than operations. We must raise cash to implement our project and begin our operations. If we do not produce sufficient cash flow to support our operations over the next 12 months, the Company will need to raise additional capital by issuing capital stock in exchange for cash in order to continue as a going concern. There are no formal or informal agreements to attain such financing. We cannot assure any investor that, if needed, sufficient financing can be obtained or, if obtained, that it will be on reasonable terms. Without realization of additional capital, it would be unlikely for operations to continue and any investment made by an investor would be lost in its entirety.
Business Development
To date, our business activities have been limited to completing the registration of our common stock on Form S-1, maintaining our reporting requirements, and securing an option to acquire the YACG mineral prospects. We have qualified for the quotation of our common stock on the OTCBB under the ticker symbol “STVS,” but no market currently exists. Investors should be aware there can be no guarantee or assurance that a market will ever develop for our common stock in the future.
Results of Operations for the period from Inception through December 31, 2010
We have not earned any revenues from our incorporation on September 9, 2009 to December 31, 2010. We do not anticipate earning revenues unless we enter into commercial production on a claim or we acquire other business or properties, which is doubtful. We have not commenced the exploration stage of our business and can provide no assurance that, should we commence the exploration stage on a claim, we will discover economic mineralization on such claim, or if minerals are discovered, that we will enter into commercial production.
We incurred operating expenses of $32,462 for the period from our inception on September 9, 2009 to December 31, 2010.
We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue exploration activities. For these reasons our auditors believe there is substantial doubt we will be able to continue as a going concern.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On September 28, 2009, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for $4,000. The Company also issued 100,000 shares at $0.02 per share for $2,000 in professional services.
On January 13, 2010, the Company filed a Prospectus pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as part of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 deemed effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 12, 2010. Pursuant to the prospectus, the Company sold 514,000 shares at $0.02 per share for $10,280. In June 2010, the Company purchased and cancelled 18,000 common shares at $0.03 per share for $540.
As of December 31, 2010, we had no cash. We have a cumulative net loss of $32,462 since inception. We have not generated any revenues and cannot provide any assurance we will ever generate revenues. We are currently dependent upon raising proceeds in order to continue as a going concern. There can be no guarantee or assurance that the Company will be able to secure adequate financing within the next three to six months and failure to do so would result in a complete loss of any investment in the Company.
Research and Development
The Company has not incurred any expense for research and development since inception and does not anticipate any costs or expenses to be incurred for research and development within the next 12 months.
The Company does not plan any purchase of significant equipment in the next 12 months.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
On September 9, 2009, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-01, “Topic 105 – Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – amendments based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“ASU No. 2009-01”). ASU No. 2009-01 re-defines authoritative US GAAP for nongovernmental entities to be only comprised of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) and, for SEC registrants, guidance issued by the SEC. The Codification is a reorganization and compilation of all then-existing authoritative US GAAP for nongovernmental entities, except for guidance issued by the SEC. The Codification is amended to effect non-SEC changes to authoritative US GAAP. Adoption of ASU No. 2009-01 only changed the referencing convention of US GAAP in the Notes to the Financial Statements.
On February 25, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 Subsequent Events Topic 855 “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” effective immediately. The amendments in the ASU remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of US GAAP. The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC’s literature. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
On March 5, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11 Derivatives and Hedging Topic 815 “Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.” This ASU clarifies the guidance within the derivative literature that exempts certain credit related features from analysis as potential embedded derivatives requiring separate accounting. The ASU specifies that an embedded credit derivative feature related to the transfer of credit risk that is only in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another is not subject to bifurcation from a host contract under ASC 815-15-25, Derivatives and Hedging – Embedded Derivatives – Recognition. All other embedded credit derivative features should be analyzed to determine whether their economic characteristics and risks are “clearly and closely related” to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and whether bifurcation is required. The ASU was effective for the Company in its fiscal fourth quarter of 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB codified the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 08-09, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition.” FASB ASU No. 2010-17 provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development transactions. FASB ASU No. 2010-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, and is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved after the adoption date. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). US GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to US GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.
Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 2 of our financial statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact our financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of the date of this Quarterly Report, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company's financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors. The term "off-balance sheet arrangement" generally means any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement to which an entity unconsolidated with the Company is a party, under which the Company has (i) any obligation arising under a guarantee contract, derivative instrument or variable interest; or (ii) a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to such entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not required.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), who is also our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the design and effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our CEO/CFO concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, these disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. The conclusion that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective was due to the presence of the following material weaknesses in disclosure controls and procedures which are indicative of many small companies with small staff: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment as the Company had only one officer and director (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both US GAAP and SEC Guidelines; and (iii) inadequate security and restricted access to computer systems including insufficient disaster recovery plans; and (iv) no written whistleblower policy. Our CEO/CFO plans to implement appropriate disclosure controls and procedures to remediate these material weaknesses, including (i) appointing additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting and a whistle blower policy; and (iii) implement sufficient security and restricted access measures regarding our computer systems and implement a disaster recovery plan.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during its most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or operating results. There are currently no known pending legal or administrative proceedings or claims that will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or operating results.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Not required.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 5. Other Information
All information required to be reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K during the period covered by this Form 10-Q has been reported.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No.
|
Document Description
|
|
31.1
|
||
32.1
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
STEVENS RESOURCES, INC.
(Registrant)
|
||
Date: February 11, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ Alex Li
|
Alex Li
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|