NovAccess Global Inc. - Annual Report: 2012 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012

Commission File Number 000-29621

XSUNX, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) 

65 Enterprise, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) 

(949) 330-8060

(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class: None 

Name of Each Exchange on which Registered: N/A 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of each class: Common Stock, no par value per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o NO x  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o NO x  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months. Yes S NO o

Check if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) (Check one): Yes o NO x  

As of March 31, 2012, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $7,843,978 million based on the closing price as reported on the OTCBB.

As of January 11, 2013 there were 297,270,080 shares of the registrant’s company stock outstanding.

XSUNX, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. All statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements include statements, among other things, concerning our business strategy, including anticipated trends and developments in and management plans for, our business and the markets in which we operate; future financial results, operating results, revenues, gross margin, operating expenses, products, projected costs and capital expenditures; research and development programs; sales and marketing initiatives; and competition. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words, such as “estimate”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “project”, “plan”, “intend”, “believe”, “forecast”, “foresee”, “likely”, “may”, “should”, “goal”, “target”, “might”, “will”, “could”, “predict” and “continue”, the negative or plural of these words and other comparable terminology. The forward-looking statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and our projections about future events. All forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based upon information available to us as of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements for any reason. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. These factors include the matters discussed in the section entitled “Item 1A: Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described under this section.

For further information about these and other risks, uncertainties and factors, please review the disclosure included in this report under Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

PART I

Item 1. Business.

In this Report, we use the terms “Company,” “XsunX,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” unless otherwise indicated, or the context otherwise requires, to refer to XsunX, Inc.  

Organization

XsunX, Inc. (“XsunX,” the “Company” or the “issuer”) is a Colorado corporation formerly known as Sun River Mining Inc. “Sun River”). The Company was originally incorporated in Colorado on February 25, 1997. Effective September 24, 2003, the Company completed a plan of reorganization and name change to XsunX, Inc.

Business Overview

XsunX, Inc. is developing and has begun to market a hybrid manufacturing solution to produce high performance Copper Indium Gallium (di) Selenide (CIGS) thin film solar cells. Our patent pending processing technology, which we call CIGSolar®, focuses on the mass production of individual thin-film CIGS solar cells that match silicon solar cell dimensions and can be offered as a non-toxic, high-efficiency and lowest-cost alternative to the use of silicon solar cells. We intend to offer licenses for the use of the CIGSolar® process technology thereby generating revenue streams through licensing fees and manufacturing royalties for the use of the technology.

Technology Overview

Our efforts have been focused on the development and customization of a series of specialized processing tools that when combined provide a turn-key high-throughput manufacturing system to produce CIGS solar cells.

Core attributes to our process method are the use of small area thermal co-evaporation techniques coupled with state-of-the-art sputter deposition technologies to improve manufacturing output, increase cell efficiency, production yields, and lower the costs for the production of high efficiency CIGS cells.

There are five (5) core process tools that when combined will produce 156 mm format (about 6” square) solar cells. We believe that it will be the ability of our system to minimize processing defects while maintaining exceptional per hour production rates that will provide superior commercial opportunities. CIGSolar® cells will be manufactured on stainless steel squares sized to match silicon solar cells currently used in over 75% of all solar modules manufactured today.

This innovative approach bridges the gap between inexpensive thin-film and costly high efficiency silicon wafer technologies to produce a new breed of solar cell combining what we believe are the best attributes of each technology. The mass production of individual, high performance CIGS solar cells – like solar building blocks – we believe will allow solar power to finally compete effectively against other sources of electrical energy.

CIGS Thin Film Solar Devices

Copper Indium Gallium (di) Selenide (CIGS) exceeds all other thin film solar cell performance to date delivering nearly 20% conversions in laboratory environments. It is this high efficiency low cost potential for CIGS, and its wide array of potential uses and applications, that we believe provides the basis to drive the cost of energy production for alternative sources to unprecedented new lows. For this reason many major research institutes and agencies worldwide view CIGS as a significant solar technology and support continuous development and research efforts related to CIGS thin films.

We believe that through the successful combination of small area co-evaporation processing techniques with the high rate sputter processing techniques, overall factory yields (total watts of production per day) can be increased thereby resulting in lower production costs while still delivering the full energy and low cost potential that CIGS based devices can offer.

CIGS Experience

The technical experience incorporated into our technology includes nearly 18 years of thin film and CIGS experience in successful technology development, equipment design, and production of several million square feet CIGS products in a commercial production setting. Our technologists have worked side by side with leading researchers at NREL and in fact, shares an R&D 100 award with NREL staff for efforts related to CIGS technology development.

In June 2011 the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) certified the peak efficiency conversion of 16.36% achieved by XsunX for Copper-Indium-Gallium-(di)selenide (CIGS) photovoltaic devices. Overall efficiency of tested samples ranged from 15.3% to 16.36% producing an average efficiency of 15.91%. The samples provided to NREL was part of a 125 mm substrates which after deposition were sub-divided into quadrants to produce NREL device test structures and analytical equipment test structures. The purpose was to provide a statistically significant body of data in support of XsunX’s continuous process improvement efforts.

Sales and Marketing

We have developed and have begun to implement a plan to offer CIGSolar® technology to existing manufacturers of solar products in the renewable energy industry. Although XsunX focuses on the development of solar technology and products, we are not a systems or a machine manufacturer. We have and intend to continue to develop relationships with equipment manufacturers that can build systems to our specifications thereby allowing us to offer turn-key manufacturing solutions to enable our licensees to manufacturer CIGS cells quickly and inexpensively.

We anticipate that at the conclusion of the initial development of our CIGS technology, that we will generate revenue from an array of services and license fees from manufacturers that utilize our technologies. These revenue fees may include inception license fees and royalty streams based upon the efficiencies our unique CIGS technology, guidance for the conversion of new or existing facilities, production line equipment and systems design and markups, training and implementation, as well as R&D support, and product reliability expertise.

Intellectual Property

We plan to market license opportunities for our technology and not directly manufacture the solar technologies and related products that may employ the use of our thin film technologies. This business model requires that we develop and maintain intellectual property that includes both patented and proprietary technologies. We have licensed certain patented and patent pending technologies, and we are developing with the intent to file for patent protection certain other thin film manufacturing technologies. The following is an outline of certain patents and technologies we are developing, have acquired, or licensed:

The Company is developing a hybrid manufacturing solution to produce high performance Copper Indium Gallium (di) Selenide (CIGS) thin film solar cells. Our system and processing technology, which we call CIGSolar®, focuses on the mass production of individual thin-film CIGS solar cells that match silicon solar cell dimensions and can be offered as a non-toxic, high-efficiency and lowest-cost alternative to the use of silicon solar cells. We have designed a proprietary system for a process known as co-evaporation used in the manufacture of the solar absorbing material CIGS. Certain key features related to this system we believe may qualify for patent protection. In November 2011 we filed provisional patent application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office identifying five (5) initial claims that through continued system and process design revisions we subsequently modified and elected to forego the filing of utility patent applications, and in July 2012 we filed three (3) additional claims related to our thermal effusion source design. As we continue to refine our designs and process technologies we may elect to abandon, modify, or file additional applications and we may seek to enforce our claims through filing of utility patents.

In September 2003, the Company was assigned the rights to three patents as part of an Asset Purchase Agreement with Xoptix Inc., a California corporation. The patents acquired were No. 6,180,871 for Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (Device), granted on January 30, 2001; No. 6,320,117 for Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (Method of Fabrication), granted on November 20, 2001; and No. 6,509,204 for Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (formed with a Schottky barrier diode and method of its manufacture), granted on January 21, 2003. We do not currently employ nor envision the use of the above named patents in the development or commercialization of our CIGSolar® technology. Because of technological and business developments within the solar industry, we believe that these patents no longer provide business opportunities for the Company to pursue.

On July 10, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a certificate of registration No. 4,172,218 granting the Company a trademark for the use of “CIGSolar”.

As we continue to develop these new technologies, we may actively seek patent protection for certain aspects related to methods and apparatus we develop. We can give no assurance that any such patent(s) will be granted for any process and manufacturing technology that we may develop individually or in conjunction with third parties.

We rely on trademark and copyright law, trade secret protection and confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, customers, partners and others to protect our proprietary rights. We have not been subject to any intellectual property claims.

Company History

XsunX is a Colorado corporation formerly known as Sun River Mining Inc. (“Sun River”). The Company was originally incorporated in Colorado on February 25, 1997. Effective September 24, 2003, the Company completed a Plan of Reorganization and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Plan”).

Pursuant to the Plan, the Company acquired the following three patents from Xoptix, Inc., a California corporation for Seventy Million (70,000,000) shares of common stock (post reverse split one for twenty): No. 6,180,871 for Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (Device), granted on January 30, 2001; No. 6,320,117 for Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (Method of Fabrication), granted on November 20, 2001; and No. 6,509,204 for Transparent Solar Cell and Method of Fabrication (formed with a Schottky barrier diode and method of its manufacture), granted on January 21, 2003.

Pursuant to the Plan, the Company authorized the issuance of 110,530,000 (post reverse split) common shares. Prior to the Plan, the Company had no tangible assets and insignificant liabilities. Subsequent to the Plan, the Company completed its name change from Sun River Mining, Inc. to XsunX, Inc. The transaction was completed on September 30, 2003.

Government Contracts

There are no government contracts as of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.

Competitive Conditions

Over developed production capacities for silicon solar cells have created highly competitive conditions over the calendar years ending 2012 and 2011. These competitive conditions have resulted in extensive price reductions exceeding in many instances over 70% for solar products incorporating the use of silicon solar cell. These market sales price reductions have significantly affected operating margins at the manufacturer level, and restructured the project planning process and selection of installed solar technologies at the project developer level. Many manufacturers of thin film solar technologies that had previously enjoyed significant per watt price advantages have seen this advantage erode and as a result there has been a significant reduction to the production of, and companies that, produce thin film solar products in the 2012 calendar period.

Conversely, the demand for, and installations of, solar systems has continued to increase with overall global installations of solar electricity projects projected to exceed 32 giga watts in the calendar year ending 2012 – an increase of approximately 15% from 2011. However, current production capacities for silicon based solar technologies exceed this demand and while market pricing has begun to see some stabilization in the 2^nd half of calendar 2012 it is anticipated that the current over supply will continue to effect manufacturer operating margins and profitability, and the technology selection process for developers. As a result, the demand for thin film solar technologies, which typically require more infrastructure and/or installed space necessary to produce similar amounts of solar power compared to silicon technologies, may continue to experience loss of market share and demand for the foreseeable future.

There continues to be a number of thin film companies that produce thin film solar products such as First Solar and Nano Solar, and others that are currently working to develop and commercialize new thin film manufacturing methods. Given the benefit of time, investment, and advances in manufacturing technologies any of these competing technologies may be offered in formats delivering power similar or greater to technologies that may be developed by us, and they may also achieve manufacturing costs per watt lower than cost per watt to manufacture technologies developed by us. However, while these risks do exist the Company believes that the more prevalent and greater risk posing both the Company, and the thin film market, will continue to be

further and prolonged market price reductions from manufacturers of silicon solar technologies. Many of the companies within the silicon industry have greater resources to devote to research, development, manufacturing and marketing than we do.

Other factors in accessing the principal competitive factors in the market for solar electric power products, we use price per watt, stability and reliability, conversion efficiency, diversity in use applications, and other performance metrics such as scalability of manufacturing processes and the ability to adapt new technologies into cell designs and the manufacturing process without antiquation of existing infrastructure. In addition, the current use of other clean renewable energy technologies such as wind, ocean thermal, ocean tidal, and geo-thermal power sources and conventional fossil fuel based technologies for the production of electricity may increase and further reduce the demand for solar technologies. If we do not compete successfully with respect to these or other factors, it could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations

The operations of the Company are subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control. Compliance with these regulations by the Company has required that we retain the use of consulting firms to assist in the engineering and design of systems related to equipment operations, management of industrial gas storage and delivery systems, and occupancy fire and safety construction standards to deal with emergency conditions. We do not anticipate that these costs will have a material effect on the Company’s operations or competitive position, and the cost of such compliance has not been material. The Company is unable to assess or predict at this time what effect additional regulations or legislation could have on its activities.

Employees and Consultants

As of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, we had three employees. This represents a decrease of one employee over the same period ended 2011. To compensate our need for scientific and technical productivity the Company also relies on qualified consultants to perform specific functions that otherwise would require an employee. We consider relations with our employees and consultants to be good.

Available Information

Our website address is www.xsunx.com. We make available on our website access to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports that we have filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information found on our website is not part of this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in evaluating XsunX and our business. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Accordingly, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment in our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks that we currently do not know about or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also impair our business operations.  

We Have Not Generated Any Significant Revenues and Our Financial Statements Raise Substantial Doubt About Our Ability to Continue As A Going Concern.

We are a development stage company and, to date, have not generated any significant revenues.  The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate our continuation as a going concern. Net loss for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $(1,555,194) and $(1,117,654), respectively. Net cash used for operations was $(379,240) and $(1,117,818) for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At September 30, 2012, we had a working capital deficit of $(544,939). From inception through September 30, 2012, we had an accumulated deficit of $(36,592,653) at September 30, 2012.

The items discussed above raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We cannot assure you that we can achieve or sustain profitability in the future. Our operations are subject to the risks and competition inherent in the establishment of a business enterprise. There can be no assurance that future operations will be profitable. Revenues and profits, if any, will depend upon various factors, including whether our product development can be completed, whether our products will achieve market acceptance and whether we obtain additional financing. We may not achieve our business objectives and the failure to achieve such goals would have a materially adverse impact on us.

We expect that we will need to obtain additional financing to continue to operate our business, including capital expenditures to complete the development of marketable thin film manufacturing technologies, and financing may be unavailable or available only on disadvantageous terms which could cause the Company to curtail its business operations and delay the execution of its business plan.

We have in the past experienced substantial losses and negative cash flow from operations and have required financing, including equity and debt financing, in order to pursue the commercialization of products based on our technologies. We expect that we will continue to need significant financing to operate our business. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available or that the terms of such additional financing, if available, will be acceptable to us. If additional financing is not available or not available on terms acceptable to us, our ability to fund our operations, complete the development of marketable technologies, develop a sales network, maintain our research and development efforts or otherwise respond to competitive pressures may be significantly impaired. We could also be forced to curtail our business operations, reduce our investments, decrease or eliminate capital expenditures and delay the execution of our business plan, including, without limitation, all aspects of our operations, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may be required to raise additional financing by issuing new securities with terms or rights superior to those of our shares of common stock, which could adversely affect the market price of our shares of common stock and our business.

We will require additional financing to fund future operations, including expansion in current and new markets, development and acquisition, capital costs and the costs of any necessary implementation of technological innovations or alternative technologies. We may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, if at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, the percentage ownership of our current stockholders will be reduced, and the holders of the new equity securities may have rights superior to those of the holders of shares of common stock, which could adversely affect the market price and the voting power of shares of our common stock. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt securities, the holders of these debt securities would similarly have some rights senior to those of the holders of shares of common stock, and the terms of these debt securities could impose restrictions on operations and create a significant interest expense for us which could have a materially adverse effect on our business.

If future products based on technologies we are developing cannot be developed for manufacture and sold commercially or our products become obsolete or noncompetitive, we may be unable to recover our investments or achieve profitability which will have a materially adverse effect on our business.

There can be no assurance that such research and development efforts will be successful or that we will be able to develop commercial applications for our products and technologies. Further, the areas in which we are developing technologies and products are characterized by rapid and significant technological change. Rapid technological development may result in our products becoming obsolete or noncompetitive. If future products based on our technologies cannot be developed for manufacture and sold commercially or our products become obsolete or noncompetitive, we may be unable to recover our investments or achieve profitability. In addition, the commercialization schedule may be delayed if we experience delays in meeting development goals, if products based on our technologies exhibit technical defects, or if we are unable to meet cost or performance goals. In this event, potential purchasers of products based on our technologies may choose alternative technologies and any delays could allow potential competitors to gain market advantages.

There is no assurance that the market will accept our products once development has been completed which could have an adverse effect on our business.

There can be no assurance that products based on our technologies will be perceived as being superior to existing products or new products being developed by competing companies or that such products will otherwise be accepted by consumers. The market prices for products based on our technologies may exceed the prices of competitive products based on existing technologies or new products based on technologies currently under development by competitors. There can be no assurance that the prices of products based on our technologies will be perceived by consumers as cost-effective or that the prices of such products will be competitive with existing products or with other new products or technologies. If consumers do not accept products based on our technologies, we may be unable to recover our investments or achieve profitability.

Other companies, many of which have greater resources than we have, may develop competing products or technologies which cause products based on our technologies to become noncompetitive which could have an adverse effect on our business.

We will be competing with firms, both domestic and foreign, that perform research and development, as well as firms that manufacture and sell solar products. In addition, we expect additional potential competitors to enter the markets for solar products in the future. Some of these current and potential competitors are among the largest industrial companies in the world with longer operating histories, greater name recognition, access to larger customer bases, well-established business organizations and product lines and significantly greater resources and research and development staff and facilities. There can be no assurance that one or more such companies will not succeed in developing technologies or products that will become available for commercial sale prior to our products, that will have performance superior to products based on our technologies or that would otherwise render our products noncompetitive. If we fail to compete successfully, our business would suffer and we may lose or be unable to gain market share.

The loss of strategic relationships used in the development of our thin film manufacturing technologies and products could impede our ability to complete the development of our products and have a material adverse effect on our business.

We have established a plan of operations under which a portion of our operations rely on strategic relationships with third parties, to provide systems design, assembly and support. A loss of any of our third party relationships for any reason could cause us to experience difficulties in implementing our business strategy. There can be no assurance that we could establish other relationships of adequate expertise in a timely manner or at all.

We may suffer the loss of key personnel or may be unable to attract and retain qualified personnel to maintain and expand our business which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our success is highly dependent on the continued services of a limited number of skilled managers, scientists, technicians, and access to qualified consultants. The loss of any of these individuals or resources could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, our success will depend upon, among other factors, the recruitment and retention of additional highly skilled and experienced management and technical personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be able to retain existing employees or to attract and retain additional personnel on acceptable terms given the competition for such personnel in industrial, academic and nonprofit research sectors.

We may not be successful in protecting our intellectual property and proprietary rights and may be required to expend significant amounts of money and time in attempting to protect these rights. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights, our competitive position in the market could suffer.

Our intellectual property consists of patent applications, trade secrets, and trade dress. Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents and maintain adequate protection of our other intellectual property for our technologies and products in the U.S. and in other countries. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S., and many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting their proprietary rights in these foreign countries. These problems may be caused by, among other factors, a lack of rules and methods for defending intellectual property rights. Also, the costs associated with the development of intellectual property rights can be significant and the Company may not be able to pursue rights initially in every region that may pose competitive challenges to us.

Our future commercial success requires us not to infringe on patents and proprietary rights of third parties, or breach any licenses or other agreements that we have entered into with respect to our technologies, products and businesses. The enforceability of patent positions cannot be predicted with certainty. We intend to apply for patents covering both our technologies and our products, if any, as we deem appropriate. Patents, if issued, may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. There can be no assurance that no other relevant patents have been issued that could block our ability to obtain patents or to operate as we would like. Others may develop similar technologies or may duplicate technologies developed by us.

We are not currently a party to any litigation with respect to any of our patent positions or trade secrets. However, if we become involved in litigation or interference proceedings declared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or other intellectual property proceedings outside of the U.S., we might have to spend significant amounts of money to defend our intellectual property rights. If any of our competitors file patent applications or obtain patents that claim inventions or other rights also claimed by us, we may have to participate in interference proceedings declared by the relevant patent regulatory agency to determine priority of invention and our right to a patent of these inventions in the U.S. Even if the outcome is favorable, such proceedings might result in substantial costs to us, including, significant legal fees and other expenses, diversion of management time and disruption of our business. Even if successful on priority grounds, an interference proceeding may result in loss of claims based on patentability grounds raised in the interference proceeding. Uncertainties resulting from initiation and continuation of any patent or related litigation also might harm our ability to continue our research or to bring products to market.

An adverse ruling arising out of any intellectual property dispute, including an adverse decision as to the priority of our inventions would undercut or invalidate our intellectual property position. An adverse ruling also could subject us to significant liability for damages, prevent us from using certain processes or products, or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements with third parties. Furthermore, necessary licenses may not be available to us on satisfactory terms, or at all.

Confidentiality agreements with employees and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information.

To protect our proprietary technologies and processes, we rely on trade secret protection as well as on formal legal devices such as patents. Although we have taken security measures to protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information, these measures may not provide adequate protection for such information. Our policy is to execute confidentiality and proprietary information agreements with each of our employees and consultants upon the commencement of an employment or consulting arrangement with us. These agreements generally require that all confidential information developed by the individual or made known to the individual by us during the course of the individual’s relationship with us be kept confidential and not be disclosed to third parties. These agreements also generally provide that technology conceived by the individual in the course of rendering services to us shall be our exclusive property. Even though these agreements are in place there can be no assurances that that trade secrets and proprietary information will not be disclosed, that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets, or that we can fully protect our trade secrets and proprietary information. Violations by others of our confidentiality agreements and the loss of employees who have specialized knowledge and expertise could

harm our competitive position and cause our sales and operating results to decline as a result of increased competition. Costly and time-consuming litigation might be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection might adversely affect our ability to continue our research or bring products to market.

Downturns in general economic conditions could adversely affect our profitability.

Downturns in general economic conditions can cause fluctuations in demand for our products, product prices, volumes and margins. Future economic conditions may not be favorable to our industry. A decline in the demand for our products or a shift to lower-margin products due to deteriorating economic conditions could adversely affect sales of our intended products and our profitability and could also result in impairments of certain of our assets.

Market demand and finished product pricing conditions could adversely affect the demand for our technology, its competitive position, and collectively our ability to commercialize our technology and any potential for future profitability.

We believe that a risk posing both the Company, and the thin film solar product market, will continue to be further and prolonged market price reductions from manufacturers of silicon solar technologies. While the primary cause for price reductions appears to be over supply which has also caused significant loses for many manufacturers the trend of oversupply may continue for the foreseeable future. Many of the companies within the silicon industry have greater resources to devote to research, development, manufacturing and marketing than we do. These factors may cause a decline in interest in our technologies and pose significant threats to our ability to successfully commercialize our technologies.

Standards for compliance with section 404 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 are uncertain, and if we fail to comply in a timely manner, our business could be harmed and our stock price could decline.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual report. The standards that must be met for management to assess the internal control over financial reporting as effective are new and complex, and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation to meet the detailed standards and will impose significant additional expenses on us. We may encounter problems or delays in completing activities necessary to make an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. If we cannot assess our internal control over financial reporting as effective, investor confidence and share value may be negatively impacted.

Our common stock is considered a “Penny Stock” and as a result, related broker-dealer requirements affect its trading and liquidity.

Our common stock is considered to be a “penny stock” since it meets one or more of the definitions in Rules 15g-2 through 15g-6 promulgated under Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act. These include but are not limited to the following: (i) the common stock trades at a price less than $5.00 per share; (ii) the common stock is not traded on a “recognized” national exchange; (iii) the common stock is not quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market, or (iv) the common stock is issued by a company with average revenues of less than $6.0 million for the past three (3) years. The principal result or effect of being designated a “penny stock” is that securities broker-dealers cannot recommend our Common Stock to investors, thus hampering its liquidity.

Section 15(g) and Rule 15g-2 require broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with documentation disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the documents before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s account. Potential investors in our Common Stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing any of our shares.

Moreover, Rule 15g-9 requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. This procedure requires the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor’s financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives.

The trading market in our common stock is limited and may cause volatility in the market price.

Our common stock is currently traded on a limited basis on the OTCBB. The OTCBB is an inter-dealer, over-the-counter market that provides significantly less liquidity than the NASDAQ Stock Market and the other national markets. Quotes for stocks included on the OTCBB are not listed in the financial sections of newspapers as are those for the NASDAQ Stock Market. Therefore, prices for securities traded solely on the OTCBB may be difficult to obtain.

The quotation of our common stock on the OTCBB does not assure that a meaningful, consistent and liquid trading market currently exists, and in recent years such market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices of many smaller companies like us. Thus, the market price for our common stock is subject to volatility and holders of common stock may be unable to resell their shares at or near their original purchase price or at any price. In the absence of an active trading market:

Due to the low price of the securities, many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in the securities. Even if a purchaser finds a broker willing to effect a transaction in these securities, the combination of brokerage commissions, state transfer taxes, if any, and any other selling costs may exceed the selling price. Further, many lending institutions will not permit the use of such securities as collateral for any loans.  Such restrictions could have a materially adverse effect on our business.

We may have difficulty raising necessary capital to fund operations as a result of market price volatility for our shares of common stock.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

Because we have a limited operating history with limited revenues to date, you may consider any one of these factors to be material. Our stock price may fluctuate widely as a result of any of the above listed factors.  In recent years, the securities markets in the United States have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies have experienced wide fluctuations that have not necessarily been related to the operations, performances, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. For these reasons, our shares of common stock can also be expected to be subject to volatility resulting from purely market forces over which we will have no control. If our business development plans are successful, we will require additional financing to continue to develop and exploit existing and new technologies and to expand into new markets. The exploitation of our technologies may, therefore, be dependent upon our ability to obtain financing through debt, equity or other means.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, there are no unresolved staff comments regarding our previously filed periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Item 2. Properties

California Corporate Office Lease

The Company leases limited facilities in Aliso Viejo, CA. At the lease rate of approximately $200 per month, and has subleased

approximately 2,000 square feet of commercial manufacturing space for the assembly and testing of its CIGSolar technologies in Irvine, CA at the lease rate of $3,000 per month plus a one-time payment of 500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock. We intend to operate in these facilities for up to one year prior to locating, as and if necessary, to larger and permanent facilities.

The Company owns no real property.

 Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary conduct of our business, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. However, in the period ended June 30, 2012 we did elect to settle the following claim;

On June 27, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 27,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value per share, to Ironridge Global IV, Ltd., in settlement of approximate $494,561 in accounts payable of the Company. The transaction thereby substantially reduced the Company’s liabilities, including its outstanding accounts payable balance associated with the assembly of the Company’s CIGSolar™ thermal evaporation technology. The shares were issued pursuant to an Order for Approval of Stipulation for Settlement of Claims between the Company and Ironridge, in settlement of the bona fide accounts payable of the Company, which had been purchased by Ironridge from certain creditors of the Company, in an amount equal to the Accounts Payable, plus fees and costs. Please see (On June 27, 2012, XsunX, Inc. - Ironridge Global IV, Ltd. under Section II, Item 5., Recent Sales of Securities) below for a detailed description of the transaction.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Price Range of Common Stock

The Company’s common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “XSNX”.  The range of high, low and close quotations for the Company’s common stock by fiscal quarter within the last two fiscal years, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, was as follows:

The market price for our common stock, like that of other technology companies, is highly volatile and is subject to fluctuations in response to variations in our operating results, announcements related to technological innovation or business development, or other events and factors. Our stock price may also be affected by broader market trends unrelated to our performance.

The above quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Number of Holders

As of September 30, 2012, there were approximately 846 record holders of the Company’s common stock, not counting shares held in “street name” in brokerage accounts, which is unknown. As of September 30, 2012, there were 281,233,150 shares of common stock outstanding on record with the Company’s stock transfer agent, Island Stock Transfer. On September 30, 2012 the last reported sales price of our common stock on the OTCBB was approximately $0.028 per share.

Transfer Agent

Our transfer agent is Island Stock Transfer located at 15500 Roosevelt Boulevard, Suite 301, Clearwater, Florida 33760, Office phone: 727-289-0010| Fax: 727-289-0069

Dividends

The Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying dividends for the foreseeable future.

Stock Option Plan

On January 5, 2007, the Board of Directors of XsunX resolved to establish the Company’s 2007 Stock Option Plan to enable the Company to obtain and retain the services of the types of employees, consultants and directors who could contribute to the Company’s long range success and to provide incentives which are linked directly to increases in share value which will inure to the benefit of all stockholders of the Company. Options granted under the Plan may be either Incentive Options or Nonqualified Options and shall be administered by the Company's Board of Directors ("Board"). Each Option shall be exercisable to the nearest whole share, in installments or otherwise, as the respective Option agreements may provide. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or of any Option agreement, each Option shall expire on the date specified in the Option agreement. A total of 20,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized under the plan.

Stock Compensation, Issuance of Stock Purchase Options

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 one million five hundred thousand options were granted. 

Table of Equity Compensation

The following table sets forth summary information, as of September 30, 2012, concerning securities authorized for issuance under all equity compensation plans and agreements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, and 2011 is as follows:

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information follows:

The weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding issued under the plan as of September 30, 2012 was as follows:

Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the financial statements of operations during the year ended September 30, 2012, included compensation expense for the stock-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of September 30, 2012 based on the grant date fair value estimated, and compensation expense for the stock-based payment awards granted subsequent to September 30, 2012, based on the grant date fair value estimated. We account for forfeitures as they occur. The stock-based compensation expense recognized in the statement of operations during the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $129,834 and $186,016, respectively.

Warrants

A summary of the Company’s warrants activity and related information follows:

At September 30, 2012, the weighted average remaining contractual life of warrants outstanding:

Recent Sales of Securities (Registered and Unregistered)

The authorized Common stock of the Company was established at 500,000,000 shares with no par value. The Company is also authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share. The rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of the preferred stock will be determined by the Board of Directors prior to issuance of such shares. The following represents a detailed analysis of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 Common stock transactions.

On November 3, 2011, in exchange for promissory note (the “Note”) of $456,920 plus accrued interest of $98,645 that had become due at September 1, 2011, the Company issued 7,000,000 restricted shares of common stock as payment for the reduction of $205,565 of principal and accrued interest balance under the Note, and exchanged the Note for and issued a new unsecured promissory exchange note (the “Exchange Note”) in the amount of $350,000.

In February 2012 the Company accepted an offer for the sale of 1,666,667 units composed of one share of restricted common stock and a five year warrant exercisable to purchase two shares of Common Stock at $0.015 per share for cash of $25,000. In March 2012 the Company accepted an offer for the sale of 1,515,152 units composed of one share of restricted common stock and a five year warrant exercisable to purchase two shares of Common Stock at $0.0165 per share for cash of $25,000. The above shares were issued in a transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company entered into Securities Purchase Agreements (the "Purchase Agreements") each providing for the sale by the Company of 8% unsecured Convertible Notes (“the Notes”) in the principal amounts of $53,000, $42,500, $32,500, $37,500, $37,500, $32,500,$37,500, and $37,500 for an aggregate total of $310,500. During the year ended September 30, 2012 the holder convert an aggregate of $143,000 of principal and $5,120 in accrued interest retiring the first three notes and portions of the fourth. Upon conversion, the Company issued an aggregate of 8,741,825 shares respectively of common voting stock to the holder. The remaining Notes mature on December 19, 2012, January 20, 2013, March 6, 2013, April 3, 2013, and May 30, 2013. The Company has the right to redeem a portion or all amounts outstanding under the any Note prior to one hundred and eighty one days from issuance of the Note under a variable redemption rate premium. After one hundred and eighty days the holder may convert into shares of common stock at a variable conversion price of 60% multiplied by the market price of the average lowest three (3) trading prices for the common stock during the ten (10) trading days prior to the conversion date.

On June 27, 2012, XsunX, Inc. (the “Company”) issued an aggregate of 27,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value per share (the “Initial Shares”), to Ironridge Global IV, Ltd. (“Ironridge”), in settlement of approximate $494,561 in accounts payable of the Company (the “Accounts Payable”). The transaction thereby substantially reduced the Company’s liabilities, including its outstanding accounts payable balance associated with the assembly of the Company’s CIGSolar™ thermal evaporation technology.

The Initial Shares were issued pursuant to an Order for Approval of Stipulation for Settlement of Claims (the “Order”) between the Company and Ironridge, in settlement of the bona fide accounts payable of the Company, which had been purchased by Ironridge from certain creditors of the Company, in an amount equal to the Accounts Payable, plus fees and costs. The Order was entered by the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Central District on June 26, 2012.

The Order also provides for an adjustment in the total number of shares which may be issuable to Ironridge based on a calculation period for the transaction, defined as that number of consecutive trading days following the date on which the Initial Shares were issued (the “Issuance Date”) required for the aggregate trading volume of the Common Stock, as reported by Bloomberg LP, to exceed $2.5 million (the “Calculation Period”). Pursuant to the Order, Ironridge will retain 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, plus that number of shares (the “Final Amount”) with an aggregate value equal to (a) the sum of the Accounts Payable plus 8% agent fee and reasonable attorney fees through the end of the Calculation Period, (b) divided by 80% of the following: the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Common Stock over the length of the Calculation Period, as reported by Bloomberg, not to exceed the arithmetic average of the individual daily VWAPs of any five trading days during the Calculation Period. The Order further provides that during the Calculation Period, or if at any time during such period a daily VWAP is below 80% of the closing price on the day before the issuance date, or if the Initial Shares are less than any reasonable Final Amount, the Company will issue additional shares (each, an “Additional Issuance”), subject to a 9.99% beneficial ownership limitation specified in the Order. The Company has reserved from its duly authorized capital stock twice the number of shares that could be issued pursuant to the Order based on the most recent daily VWAP at the time of the Order and will, if necessary, increase the number of shares reserved based on the lowest daily VWAP during the Calculation Period. At the end of the Calculation Period, (a) if the sum of the Initial Shares and any

Additional Issuance is less than the Final Amount, the Company shall issue additional shares to Ironridge, up to the Final Amount, and (b) if the sum of the Initial Shares and any Additional Issuance is greater than the Final Amount, Ironridge shall promptly return any remaining shares to the Company and its transfer agent for cancellation.

In connection with the transaction, Ironridge represented that it does not hold any short position in the company’s stock, and warranted that it would not to engage in or affect, directly or indirectly, any short sale of the common stock.

The issuance is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) thereof, as an issuance of securities in exchange for bona fide outstanding claims, where the terms and conditions of such issuance are approved by a court after a hearing upon the fairness of such terms and conditions.

Pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement entered into between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Group, LLC (LPC) in March 2010 under which an S-1 Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC on June 30, 2010, and a Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 registration was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2011, over a 25 month period the Company had sold to Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC approximately 12,410,184 shares for a total investment of $1,125,000. These shares were sold at various pricing between $0.08 and $0.10 per share. An additional 1,423,608 shares were provided to LPC as a financing commitment fee. The agreement with Lincoln Park expired in April 2012 and the registration statement is not available for use for sales to Lincoln Park.

Issuance of Shares for Services

Between February and August 2012, the Company issued 1,450,078 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to two services providers for services at fair value of $44,500. In May 2012 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock were issued to a scientific consultant for $7,500 in services related to a special assembly project and twelve months of consulting services valued at $60,000. In July 2012 as part of an amendment to facility lease terms that provided for the increase in usable space the Company issued 500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock as partial payment for the ensuing 12-month lease commencing July 1, 2012 to the property owner. The above shares were issued in a transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

Use of Proceeds from the Sale of Securities

The proceeds from the above sales of securities were and are being used primarily to fund efforts by the Company to develop marketable technologies for the manufacture of thin film solar technologies, and in the day-to-day operations of the Company and to pay the accrued liabilities associated with these operations.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

N/A 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations

Cautionary and Forward-Looking Statements

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions as described under the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” that appears earlier in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under “Item 1A: Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Readers should carefully review the factors described in other documents the Company files from time to

time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K filed and any Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Company.

Business Overview

XsunX, Inc. is developing and has begun to market a hybrid manufacturing solution to produce high performance Copper Indium Gallium (di) Selenide (CIGS) thin film solar cells. Our patent pending processing technology, which we call CIGSolar®, focuses on the mass production of individual thin-film CIGS solar cells that match silicon solar cell dimensions and can be offered as a non-toxic, high-efficiency and lowest-cost alternative to the use of silicon solar cells. We intend to offer licenses for the use of the CIGSolar® process technology thereby generating revenue streams through licensing fees and manufacturing royalties for the use of the technology.

Our efforts have been focused on the development and customization of a series of specialized processing tools that when combined provide a turn-key high-throughput manufacturing system to produce CIGS solar cells.

Core attributes to our process method are the use of small area thermal co-evaporation techniques coupled with state-of-the-art sputter deposition technologies to improve manufacturing output, increase cell efficiency, production yields, and lower the costs for the production of high efficiency CIGS cells.

There are five (5) core process tools that when combined will produce 156mm format (about 6” square) solar cells. We believe that it will be the ability of our system to minimize processing defects while maintaining exceptional per hour production rates that will provide superior commercial opportunities. CIGSolar® cells will be manufactured on stainless steel squares sized to match silicon solar cells currently used in more than 75% of all solar modules manufactured today.

This innovative approach bridges the gap between inexpensive thin-film and costly high efficiency silicon wafer technologies to produce a new breed of solar cell combining what we believe are the best attributes of each technology. The mass production of individual, high performance CIGS solar cells – like solar building blocks – we believe will allow solar power to finally compete effectively against other sources of electrical energy.

Plan of Operations

For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, the Company has developed a plan of operations focused on completing the assembly of its multi-chamber CIGSolar® thermal co-evaporation system and the subsequent testing and calibration of the system necessary to operate and allow the system to produce marketable samples of its manufacturing capabilities. The purpose of these efforts is to provide hands-on access to interested customers of a production-sized multi-chamber CIGSolar® system. Working with third party systems suppliers who will ultimately provide several of the support systems within our CIGSolar® system configuration we plan to establish limited scale pilot CIGS solar cell production capabilities to enhance marketing and sales efforts, continued CIGSolar® process improvement, and to support general business development efforts related to the commercialization of our CIGS solar cell manufacturing technology.

Our Plan of Operations, based upon the aforementioned activities, excluding non-cash operating expenses, requires $360,000 for general and administrative activities, $165,000 to support increased sales and marketing efforts, and $495,000 to expand the scope and capabilities of our limited scale production system through the addition of process support tools, and to add additional full time technical staff to provide continued process development and improvement under our technology license model, and for support purposes of the systems that may be placed in the field as we work to commercialize our CIGSolar® manufacturing technology. However the cash flow requirements associated with the completion of these efforts, and the transition to revenue recognition may continue to exceed cash generated from operations in the current and future periods. If we are unable to complete a sale of our technology and transition to revenue recognition prior to completion of this plan we will need to obtain additional financing from other sources or adjust the timing of our plans. However, we have been able to raise capital in a series of equity and debt offerings in the past. While there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain additional financing, on terms acceptable to us and at the times required, or at all, we believe that sufficient capital can be raised in the foreseeable future as necessary.

The Company may change any or all of the budget categories in the execution of its business attempts. None of the items is to be considered fixed or unchangeable.

Management believes the summary data and audit presented herein is a fair presentation of the Company’s results of operations for the periods presented. Due to the Company’s change in primary business focus and new business opportunities these historical results may not necessarily be indicative of results to be expected for any future period. As such, future results of the Company may differ significantly from previous periods.

Results of Operations for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2011.

Revenue and Cost of Sales:

The Company generated no revenues in the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, and 2011. There were no associated costs of goods sold in any of the fiscal periods represented above. The Company to date has had minimal revenue and cost of sales, and is still in the development stage.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:

Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased by $(300,913) during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 to $645,546 as compared to $946,459 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in SG&A expenses was related primarily to a general reduction to salaries, staffing, and operating expenses under the Company’s re-focused plan of operations for the development of a new CIGSolar® thin film solar manufacturing technology. We anticipate that expenditures associated with the commercial development and sales of our thin-film solar manufacturing technologies will increase SG&A expenditures in the future. However, we plan to offer our technology as a licensable process to existing solar product manufacturers which we anticipate will mitigate future expenditures that would normally be associated with our need to establish direct large scale manufacturing capabilities and the associated facility infrastructure.

Research and Development:

Research and development decreased by $(159,819) during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 to $122,673 as compared to $282,492 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in research related employees used in the period on the development of our new thin film solar manufacturing technology CIGSolar®. During the fiscal year while reducing direct research development costs we focused resources on the assembly and customization of a specialized multi-chamber processing tool that incorporates our patent pending processing technology to provide a turn-key high-throughput manufacturing system to produce the CIGS thin film solar absorber. We anticipate that future R&D expense will again increase as we complete this process and work to further develop and improve this processing technology.

Net Loss:

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, our net loss was $(1,555,194) as compared to a net loss of $(1,117,654) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.The increase in net loss of $(437,540) primarily stems from a loss on settlement of debt in the current period. This debt was primarily attributed to the costs associated with the assembly of our multi-chamber CIGSolar processing system. The Company anticipates the trend of losses to continue in future periods until the Company can recognize sales of significance of which there is no assurance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had a working capital deficit at September 30, 2012 of $(544,939), as compared to a working capital deficit of $(654,041) as of September 30, 2011. The decrease of $(109,102) in working capital deficit was the result of an increase in prepaid expenses, with a decrease in cash, accounts payable, and accrued expenses. There was no revenue producing activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.

Cash flow used by operating activities was $(379,240) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, as compared to cash flow used by operating activities of $(1,117,818) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in cash flow used of $(738,578) by operating activities was primarily due to a net change in non-cash expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses and prepaid expenses.

Cash flow used by investing activities was $(3,309) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, as compared to cash flow provided in investing activities of $158,972 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The net change in investing activities was primarily due to proceeds received of $17,000 from the sale of certain assets, and a deposit refunded due to cancellation of a purchase order in the amount of $230,000, offset by a payment made on a purchase order of $(81,975), and the purchase of fixed assets of $(6,053) in the prior fiscal year.

Cash flow provided by financing activities was $360,500 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, as compared to cash provided by financing activities of $825,000 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in cash flow provided by financing activities was the result of a reduction to cash provided through equity financing. Our capital needs have primarily been met from the proceeds of private placements, and convertible notes as we are currently in the development stage and had no revenues.

The Company is currently engaged in efforts to develop a thin film solar manufacturing technology that we believe provides an opportunity for XsunX to establish a competitive advantage within the solar industry. However the cash flow requirements associated with the completion of these development efforts, and the transition to revenue recognition will exceed cash generated from operations in the current and future periods. We will need to seek to obtain additional financing from equity and/or debt placements. We have been able to raise capital in a series of equity and debt offerings in the past. While there can be no assurances that we will be able to

obtain such additional financing, on terms acceptable to us and at the times required, or at all, we believe that sufficient capital can be raised in the foreseeable future as necessary.

For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013 the Company has developed a plan of operations focused on the assembly of a multi-chamber CIGSolar® thermal co-evaporation system to provide hands-on access to interested customers of a production-sized multi-chamber CIGSolar® system. Our plan requires $360,000 for general and administrative activities, $165,000 to support increased sales and marketing efforts, and $495,000 to expand the scope and capabilities of our limited scale production system through the addition of process support tools, and to add additional full time technical staff to provide continued process development and improvement under our technology license model, and for support purposes of the systems that may be placed in the field as we work to commercialize our CIGSolar® manufacturing technology. To accomplish this plan we have engaged and plan to continue to engage consultants, equipment vendors, and component manufacturers to assist in the supply of materials and assembly of our system. However the cash flow requirements associated with the completion of these efforts, and the transition to revenue recognition may continue to exceed cash generated from operations in the current and future periods. If we are unable to complete a sale of our technology and transition to revenue recognition prior to completion of this plan we will need to obtain additional financing from other sources or adjust the timing of our plans. However, we have been able to raise capital in a series of equity and debt offerings in the past. While there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain additional financing, on terms acceptable to us and at the times required, or at all, we believe that sufficient capital can be raised in the foreseeable future as necessary.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities that would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance-sheet arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our products will be quoted for sale and licensure in United States dollars and as our business development efforts progress we anticipate the sale and/or licensure of our products to foreign entities. To the extent that we may be exposed to foreign currency risks related to the rise and/or fall of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar we will report in United States dollars.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

All financial information required by this Item is attached hereto at the end of this report beginning on page F-1 and is hereby incorporated by reference.  

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Effective as of July 17, 2009, the board of directors of the Company approved the engagement of HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP (“HJ”) as its principal independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements. During the Company’s two (2) most recent fiscal years, as well as the subsequent interim period through the Effective Date, there were no disagreements between the Company and HJ on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to their satisfaction would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with HJ’s report. During the Company’s most recent two (2) fiscal years, as well as the subsequent interim period through the Effective Date, HJ did not advise the Company of any of the matters identified in Item 304(a)(v)(A) - (D) of Regulation S-K.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. The evaluation included certain control areas in which we have made, and are continuing to make, changes to improve and enhance controls. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, and we have discovered no material weakness.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control structure and procedures over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) under the Exchange Act. The SEC rule making for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 404 requires that a company's internal controls over financial reporting be based upon a recognized internal control

framework. Our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012 based on the framework set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) that has been modified to more appropriately reflect the current limited operational scope of the Company as a Development Stage company. The Company used the COSO guide - The Internal Control over Financial Reporting - Guidance for Smaller Public Companies to implement the Company’s internal control framework. Additionally, the limited scope of operations of the Company means that traditional separation of duties controls are not used by the Company as a result of the limited staffing within the Company. The Company relies on alternative procedures to overcome this non-material control weakness.

During the Company's fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, management continued to assess the Company's internal and controls procedure documents basing any need for revision upon additional guidance for implementing the model framework created by COSO as is appropriate to our operations and operations of smaller public entities. This framework is entitled Internal Control-Integrated Framework. The COSO Framework, which is the common shortened title, was published in 1992 and has been updated, and we believe will satisfy the SEC requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As the Company expands operations, additional staff will be added to implement separation of duties controls as well.

Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer concluded that our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012 was effective.    Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except as noted above, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Auditors Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management's report in this annual report.

Item 9B. Other Information

On November 7, 2012, XsunX, Inc. (the "Company") consummated a Securities Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") providing for the sale by the Company of 8% unsecured Convertible Note in the principal amount of $37,500 (the “Note”) which amount was advanced immediately at the time of the sale. The Note matures on August 7, 2013 Note. The Company has the right to redeem a portion or all amounts outstanding under the either Note prior to one hundred and eighty one days from issuance of the Note under a variable redemption rate premium. After one hundred and eighty days the holder may convert into shares of common stock at a conversion price of sixty percent of the average lowest three closing bid prices for the common stock, during the ten trading day period ending on the latest complete trading day prior to the conversion date. The holder has certain rights of first refusal related to financings of less than seventy five thousand dollars by the Company, and in the event of certain default conditions the Company may be subject a default premium of fifty percent.

Subsequent to the end of the year ended September 30, 2012, a holder of Securities Purchase Agreements (the "Purchase Agreements") each providing for the sale by the Company of 8% unsecured Convertible Notes (“the Notes”) in the principal amounts of $37,500 of which $22,500 remained, $37,500, and $32,500 converted the total remaining principal of $92,500 of principal and $4,800 in accrued interest retiring the notes. Upon conversion, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,265,139 shares respectively of common voting stock to the holder.

In exchange for a promissory note (the “Note”) of $350,000 plus accrued interest of $35,863 that had become due at September 30, 2012, the Company issued a new unsecured promissory exchange note (the “Exchange Note”) in the amount of $385,863 in November 2012. The Holder and the Company exchanged the Note solely for (i) a 12% promissory Exchange Note, (ii) and 500,000 shares of common stock. Interest on the Exchange note accrued interest at the rate of 18% per annum commencing on September 30, 2012 through October 31, 2012 and thereafter at the rate of 12%. The Exchange Note is convertible into securities of the Company by the Holder at the lesser of $0.025 or 70% of the lowest volume weighted average (VWAP) occurring during the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date on which the Holder may elect to convert portions of the note. The Exchange Note matures on September 30, 2013 and the Company can prepay any then remaining principal and accrued interest balance upon first providing the holder with a ten day prepayment notice.

On November 7, 2012, the Company issued a 10% unsecured convertible promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) for the principal sum of up to $78,000 plus accrued interest on any advanced principal funds. Upon issuance of the Promissory Note the lender immediately advance the sum of $25,000 to the Company, and may elect to pay additional consideration to the Company in such amounts and at such times as the Lender may choose in its sole discretion. The principal sum due the Lender shall be prorated based on the actual total consideration paid to the Company by the Lender such that the Company will only be required to repay the amount funded by the lender, nor shall any interest or other rights extend to any unfunded portion of the Promissory Note. The Promissory Note matures one year from its issuance and may be converted by the Lender into shares of common stock of the Company at the lesser of $.0125 per share of at a fifty percent of the lowest trade price in the twenty five trading days prior to the conversion of any outstanding funded principal or accrued interest under the Promissory Note.

On December 13, 2012, the Company issued a 10% unsecured convertible promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) for the principal sum of up to $250,000 and accrued interest on any advanced principal funds. Upon issuance of the Promissory Note the lender immediately advance the sum of $50,000 to the Company, and may elect to pay additional consideration to the Company in such amounts and at such times as the Lender may choose in its sole discretion. The principal sum due the Lender shall be prorated based on the actual total consideration paid to the Company by the Lender such that the Company will only be required to repay the amount funded by the lender, nor shall any interest or other rights extend to any unfunded portion of the Promissory Note. If the Company repays the Promissory Note on or before 90 days from the issuance date, the interest rate shall be zero percent (0%). If the Company does not repay the Promissory Note on or before 90 days from the issuance date, a one-time Interest charge of 10% shall be applied to the any then advanced principal sum. The Promissory Note matures one year from its issuance and may be converted by the Lender into shares of common stock of the Company at the lesser of $.025 per share of at a sixty percent of the lowest trade price in the twenty five trading days prior to the conversion of any outstanding funded principal or accrued interest under the Promissory Note.

In accordance with the Stipulation for Settlement of Claims (“Stipulation”), dated June 27, 2012, by and between Ironridge Global IV, Ltd and the Company as documented in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC484549, pursuant to which the Company delivered 27,500,000 shares (“Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, no par value (“Common Stock”) to Ironridge. The Stipulation provided for the subsequent issuance by the Company to Ironridge of additional Shares of Common Stock thereunder, the (“Adjustment Shares”). In accordance with the stipulation on November 26, 2012 subject to a request by Ironridge the Company issued 6,271,791 Adjustment Shares to Ironridge Global IV, Ltd.

Effective January 9, 2013, as part of a continued effort that began in January 2012 to maximize the use of capital resources necessary to complete the assembly and marketing of the Company’s CIGSolar technology through reductions to operating costs and functions that are redundant, the Company elected to consolidate its executive management operations which has eliminated the need to have multiple officers performing similar functions. In furtherance of these efforts the Company’s Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Joseph Grimes as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer, effective immediately, and approved by unanimous consent the reorganization and appointment of executive  management as follows;

In connection with the resignation of Mr. Grimes, the Board appointed Mr. Tom Djokovich to the position of President. Mr. Djokovich will continue to also serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), a Director, and Secretary duties which he has performed since October 2003. Mr. Djokovich will focus on the strategic oversight of the day-to-day operations and securities compliance. Mr. Djokovich did not enter into, or receive any grant or award under, any material plan, contract or arrangement in connection with his assumption of duties as the Company’s President. Mr. Djokovich is 55 years old.

Mr. Grimes will continue to serve as a member of the Board of Directors and will assume the position of Executive Sales Manager. As Executive Sales Manager, Mr. Grimes will manage the marketing efforts associated with the Company’s commercialization efforts of its CIGSolar thin film manufacturing technology, functions he began to manage in 2012. Mr. Grimes previously held the position of President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Grimes did not enter into, or receive any grant or award under, any material plan, contract or arrangement in connection with his assumption of duties as the Company’s executive sales manager. Mr. Grimes is 55 years old.

Issuance of Stock Purchase Options

In January 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the grant of stock option agreements to the named individuals listed below as follows:

The options issued to the named directors vested upon issuance of the grant to each named individual.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

The following table lists the executive offices and directors of the Company during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012:

The above listed directors will serve until the next annual meeting of the stockholders or until their death, resignation, retirement, removal, or disqualification, and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Vacancies in the existing Board of Directors are filled by majority vote of the remaining Directors. There are no agreements or understandings for any officer or director to resign at the request of another person and no officer or director is acting on behalf of or will act at the direction of any other person. There is no family relationship between any of our directors.

The directors of the Company will devote such time to the Company’s affairs on an “as needed” basis, but typically less than 20 hours per month. As a result, the actual amount of time which they will devote to the Company’s affairs is unknown and is likely to vary substantially from month to month.

Biographical Information

Mr. Tom Djokovich, age 55, Chief Executive Officer and a Director as of October 2003, acting Principal Accounting Officer as of September 2009;

Mr. Djokovich was the founder and served from 1995 to 2002 as the Chief Executive Officer of Accesspoint Corporation, a vertically integrated provider of electronic transaction processing and e-business solutions for merchants. Under Mr. Djokovich’s guidance, Accesspoint became a member of the Visa/MasterCard association, the national check processing association NACHA, and developed one of the payment industry’s most diverse set of network based transaction processing, business management and CRM systems for both Internet and conventional points of sale. Prior to Accesspoint, Mr. Djokovich founded TMD Construction and Development in 1979. TMD provided management for multimillion-dollar projects incorporating at times hundreds of employees, subcontractors and international material acquisitions for commercial, industrial and custom residential construction services as a licensed building and development firm in California. In 1995 Mr. Djokovich developed an early Internet based business-to-business ordering system for the construction industry.

Mr. Joseph Grimes, age 55, Chief Operating Officer as of April 2006, a Director as of August 2008, and President as of March 2009;

Mr. Grimes brings to XsunX more than eight years direct experience in thin-film technology and manufacturing. He was most recently Vice President, Defense Solutions, for Envisage Technology Company, where he directed and managed the defense group business development process, acquisition strategies and vision for next generation applications from October 2005 to March 2006. Previously he was Co-Founder, President and CEO of ISERA Group, where he established the company infrastructure and guided five development teams, finally selling the company to Envisage from 1993 to 2005. His direct experience in thin-film technology came with Applied Magnetics Corporation from 1985 to 1993 as manager for thin-film prototype assembly. Mr. Grimes holds a Bachelor’s degree in business economics and environmental studies, and a Master’s in computer modeling and operation research applications, both from the University of California at Santa Barbara.

Mr. Robert Wendt, age 50, Chief Technology Officer as of March 2009; (1)

Mr. Wendt holds a B.S. and M.S. in Metallurgical Engineering and Material Science from the Colorado School of Mines. His responsibility encompasses technical specification of the facilities, equipment, and manufacturing processes for XsunX. Prior to joining XsunX in 2007, Mr. Wendt served at various times as Vice President of Sales, Product Development, and Engineering at Global Solar Energy from May 1996 to 2005. At Global Solar, Mr. Wendt has led and directed several areas including copper indium gallium di-selenide (CIGS) technology development, equipment design and integration, facilities design and construction, engineering, production, and operations.  

Prior to Global Solar, Mr. Wendt was at ITN with responsibility for the development of thin-film deposition technologies, thin-film PV, and development of charge controller/battery systems for portable solar cell powered systems. Prior to joining ITN, Mr. Wendt spent eight years with Lockheed Marietta Astronautics, Denver Division. While in this position, Mr. Wendt was program manager/principal investigator on over 20 material-based programs. During 1994/1995, Mr. Wendt was the technical lead for thin-film PV research at the Denver Division.

Independent Directors

Mr. Thomas Anderson, age 47, became a director of the Company in August 2001;

Mr. Anderson presently works as the Director of Southwest Business Operations for American Capital Energy, a commercial and utility scale solar integrator. He has been with American Capital Energy since October, 2008.  He recently served as Managing Director of the Environmental Science and Engineering Directorate of Qinetiq North America in Los Alamos, New Mexico. He was with Qinetiq North America, formerly Apogen Technologies, from January, 2005, through September, 2008. Mr. Anderson worked for 19 years in the environmental consulting field, providing consulting services in the areas of environmental compliance, characterization and remediation services to Department of Energy, Department of Defense, and industrial clients. He formerly worked as a Senior Environmental Scientist at Concurrent Technologies Corp. from November 2000 to December 2004. He earned his B.S. in Geology from Denison University and his M.S. in Environmental Science and Engineering from Colorado School of Mines.

Mr. Oz Fundingsland as Director, age 69, became a director of the Company in November 2007;

On November 12, 2007, the Company announced the appointment of Mr. Oz Fundingsland as Director, effective November 12, 2007. Mr. Fundingsland brings over forty years of sales, marketing, executive business management, finance, and corporate governance experience to XsunX. His professional and business experience principally originated with his tenure, commencing in 1964, at Applied Magnetics Corp., a disk drive and data storage company. Prior to his retirement from Applied Magnetics in 1994, Mr. Fundingsland served as an Executive Officer and Vice President of Sales and Marketing for 11 years directing sales growth from $50 million to over $550 million. Commencing in 1993 through 2003 Mr. Fundingsland served as a member of the board of directors for the International Disk Drive Equipment Manufacturers Association “IDEMA” where he retired emeritus, and continues to serve as an advisor to the board. For the last 13 years, Mr. Fundingsland has provided consulting services assisting with sales, marketing, and management to a host of companies within the disk drive, optical, software, and LED industries.

Dr. Michael A. Russak as Director, age 65, became a director of the Company in November 2007;

On November 28, 2007, the Company announced the appointment of Dr. Michael A. Russak as a Director, effective November 26, 2007. Dr. Russak is also a member of the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board. Dr. Michael A. Russak currently holds the position of Executive Vice President of Business Development with Intevac, Inc. in Santa Clara, CA.  He has been working as a consultant in the hard disk drive and photovoltaic industries since Jan 2007. He is also currently the Executive Director of IDEMA-U.S. (the hard disk drive industry trade association) and a member of the Board of Directors and Scientific Advisory Board of XsunX, Inc. From 2001 to 2006 he was President and Chief Technical Officer of Komag, Inc., a manufacturer of hard magnetic recording disks for hard disk drive applications. From 1993 to 2001 he was Chief Technical Officer of HMT Technology, Inc. also a manufacturer of magnetic recording disks. From 1985 to 1993 he was a research staff member and program manager in the Research Division of the IBM Corporation. Dr. Russak has over thirty five years of industrial experience progressing from a research scientist to senior executive officer of two public companies. He has expertise in thin film materials and devices for magnetic recording, photovoltaic, solar thermal applications, semiconductor devices as well as glass, glass-ceramic and ceramic materials. He also has over twelve years’ experience at the executive management level of public companies with significant off shore development and manufacturing functions. He received his B.S. in Ceramic Engineering in 1968 and Ph.D. in Materials Science in 1971, both from Rutgers University in New Brunswick, NJ. During his career, he has been a contributing scientist and program manager at the Grumman Aerospace Corporation, a Research Staff Member and technical manager in the areas of thin film materials and processes at the Research Division of the IBM Corporation at the T.J. Watson Research Laboratories. In 1993, he joined HMT Technology, a manufacturer of thin film disks for magnetic storage, as Vice President of Research and Development. His responsibilities included new product design and introduction. Dr. Russak became Chief Technical Officer of HMT and held that position until 2000 when HMT merged with Komag Inc. Dr. Russak was appointed President and Chief Technical Officer of the combined company. He continued to set technical, operational and business direction for Komag until his retirement at the end of 2006. He has published over 90 technical papers, and holds 23 U.S. patents.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of the members of the Board of Directors or other executives has been involved in any bankruptcy proceedings, criminal proceedings, any proceeding involving any possibility of enjoining or suspending members of our Board of Directors or other executives from engaging in any business, securities or banking activities, and have not been found to have violated, nor been accused of having violated, any federal or state securities or commodities laws.

Board Committees; Audit Committee

As of September 30, 2012, the Company’s board was comprised of five directors, three of which are considered independent directors and the Company did not have an audit committee. Further, none of the members of the board of directors is qualified as a financial expert. We are a development stage company with limited resources and we are actively seeking a qualified financial expert for addition to the board. The board of directors will appoint committees as necessary, including an audit committee as resources permit.  In the meantime, the Board serves as the Company’s audit committee utilizing business judgment rules and good faith efforts.

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors, and certain persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities (collectively, “Reporting Persons”), to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership (“Section 16 Reports”) with the SEC. Reporting Persons are required by the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16 Reports they file.  Based on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, or written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors, and greater than ten-percent beneficial owners were complied with the exception that one report, covering one transaction was not timely filed by the chief executive officer with the SEC via year-end report on Form 5.

Code of Ethics

The Company’s board of directors adopted a Code of Ethics policy on January 7, 2008.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Overview

We are a development stage Company and we rely on our board of directors to evaluate compensation and incentive offerings made by the Company as it applies to our executive officers, and efforts to attract and maintain qualified staff. To date, our compensation policy has been conducted on a case by case basis with input from our chief executive officer, and focused on the following four primary areas; (a) first the Company’s commitment capabilities within the scope of objectives and capital capabilities, (b) salary compensatory with peer group companies and peer position, (c) cash bonuses tied to sales and revenue attainment, and (d) long term equity compensation tied to strategic objectives of establishing marketable solar technologies.

In the year ended September 30, 2012 the Company’s named executive offices elected to accept reductions to compensation to allow for the re-direction of available capital resources for use in the purchase and assembly of the Company’s multi-chamber CIGSolar® thermal co-evaporation system. As a result, initially salaries were reduced effective October 1, 2011 to $120,000 each annually. Then effective January 1, 2012 salaries were further reduced and/or eliminated to allow further re-direction of available capital resources towards system assembly efforts. Since January 2012, wages have been paid as capital resources have allowed, and as work efforts have been extended to complete the strategic objectives of the Company.

In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the individuals in the Summary Compensation Table set forth below are referred to as the “named executive officers”. Generally, the types of compensation and benefits provided to the named executive officers may be similar to what we intend to provide to future executive officers.

Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation earned by our chief executive officer, our chief operating officer, and our chief technical officer (collectively, our “named executive officers”) for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, and 2011 respectively.

Summary Compensation Table

No other compensation not described above was paid or distributed during the listed fiscal years to the executive officers of the Company.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table sets forth summary information regarding all grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers during the two years ended September 30, 2012, and 2011 respectively.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table

The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards with respect our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012

Option Exercises

None

Pension Benefits

None

Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

None

Employment Agreements and Arrangements

Tom M. Djokovich

Mr. Djokovich serves as our chief executive officer, acting principal accounting officer, and a director. We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Djokovich. He currently works at the discretion of the board of directors as he has since October 2003. His annual base compensation for the 2012 fiscal period was $85,215 in collected wages and benefits, and another $37,035 in wages that were forgiven by Mr. Djokovich for use by the Company in the purchase of necessary supplies and recorded as contributed capital in the period. Mr. Djokovich’s collected wages and contributed services totaled $122,250 in the year ended September 30, 2012. Mr. Djokovich was also and he was provided with approximately $359 per month allowance for use in the payment of medical benefits. His total compensation is based solely on the annual base cash salary and we do not have any equity based, cash bonus, or special compensation agreements or understanding in place with Mr. Djokovich. Mr. Djokovich is also subject to confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions which provide that Mr. Djokovich will not divulge information or solicit employees for 24 months after termination of his employment.

Joseph Grimes

Mr. Grimes serves as our chief operating officer, president, and a director. We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Grimes and in the 2012 fiscal period he worked at the discretion of the board of directors. His annual base compensation for the 2012 fiscal period was $42,308 in collected wages and benefits, and another $30,000 in wages that were forgiven by Mr. Grimes for use by the Company in the purchase of necessary supplies and recorded as contributed capital in the period. Mr. Grimes collected wages and contributed services totaled $72,308 in the year ended September 30, 2012. Mr. Grimes was also provided with approximately $913 per month allowance for use in the payment of medical benefits. Mr. Grimes is also subject to confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions which provide that Mr. Grimes will not divulge information or solicit employees for 24 months after termination of his employment.

Robert Wendt

Mr. Wendt serves as our chief technology officer. We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Wendt and in the 2012 fiscal period he worked at the discretion of the board of directors. His annual base salary compensation for the 2012 period was $36,838 in collected wages and benefits, and another $30,000 in wages that were forgiven by Mr. Wendt for use by the Company in the purchase of necessary supplies and recorded as contributed capital in the period. Mr. Wendt’s collected wages and contributed services totaled $66,838 in the year ended September 30, 2012. Mr. Wendt was also provided with approximately $324 per month allowance for use in the payment of medical benefits. Mr. Wendt is also subject to confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions which provide that Mr. Wendt will not divulge information or solicit employees for 24 months after termination of his employment.

On May 7, 2012, the Company and Mr. Wendt agreed to terminate his position as CTO and alternately entered into a twelve-month technical consulting agreement with Mr. Wendt under which Mr. Wendt continues to assist the Company with its efforts to commercialize its CIGSolar® technology.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-In-Control

None

Long Term Incentive Plans — Awards in Last Fiscal Year

None

Director Compensation

In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, Directors received no cash compensation for their service to the Company as directors.  Each none affiliated Director did receive an option grant in the amount of 500,000 options exercisable at $0.04 cents each into common shares of the Company’s stock. All Directors were reimbursed for any expenses actually incurred in connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE OF DIRECTORS

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 adjustments or additions to new or existing employment agreements were reviewed and deliberated by the five members of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2012, the number of shares of common stock owned of record and beneficially by executive officers, directors and persons who hold 5.0% or more of the outstanding common stock of the Company. Also included are the shares held by all executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed below is c/o XsunX, Inc., 65 Enterprise, Aliso Viejo, California 92656.

All directors and executive officers as a group of (6 persons) account for ownership of 21,993,000 shares representing 7.82% of the issued and outstanding common stock. Each principal shareholder has sole investment power and sole voting power over the shares.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

No officer, director, or related person of the Company has or proposes to have any direct or indirect material interest in any asset proposed to be acquired by the Company through securities holdings, contracts, options or otherwise or any transaction in which the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the Company's total assets at year end.

The Company has adopted a policy under which any consulting or finder’s fee that may be paid to a third party for consulting services to assist management in evaluating a prospective business opportunity can be paid in stock, stock purchase options or in cash. Any such issuance of stock or stock purchase options would be made on an ad hoc basis. Accordingly, the Company is unable to predict whether or in what amount such a stock issuance might be made.

The following directors are independent:  Thomas Anderson, Oz Fundingsland and. Dr. Michael Russak.

The following directors are not independent:  Tom Djokovich and Joseph Grimes.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

2012

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP incurred $35,400 in Audit Fees for the following professional services: review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended December 30, 2011, March 31, 2012, June 30, 2012 and for audit fees related to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K. No Audit-Related, Tax or Other fees were billed by HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.

2011

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP incurred $28,600 in Audit Fees for the following professional services: review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended December 30, 2010, March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011 and for audit fees related to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K. No Audit-Related, Tax or Other fees were billed by HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Exhibits:

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
XsunX, Inc. (A Development Stage Company)

Alisa Viejo, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of XsunX, Inc. (a development stage company) as of September 30, 2012 and 2011 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from February 25, 1997 (inception) to September 30, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The financial statements for the period from February 25, 1997 (inception) to September 30, 2008 were audited by other auditors and our opinion, insofar as it relates to cumulative amounts included for such prior periods, is based solely on the reports of such other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of XsunX, Inc. (a development stage company) as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from February 25, 1997 (inception) to September 30, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company does not generate significant revenue and has negative cash flows from operations which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah

January 11, 2013

XSUNX, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements

XSUNX, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements

XSUNX, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Stockholders' Equity

From Inception February 25, 1997 to September 30, 2012