NUGL, INC. - Quarter Report: 2012 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
o QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________________ to _________________
Commission File No.: 000-49672
VIDABLE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
88-0408213
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
1802 N. Carson Street, Suite 108
Carson City, NV 89701
(Address of principal executive offices)
Issuer’s telephone number: (775) 887-0670
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
As of May 15, 2012, 400,201,154 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding.
ITEM 1 – CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
VIDABLE, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
12,183
|
$
|
145
|
||||
Total current assets
|
12,183
|
145
|
||||||
PROPERTY -- HELD FOR SALE
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
||||||
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$
|
13,183
|
$
|
1,145
|
||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
|
$
|
33,296
|
$
|
43,685
|
||||
Notes Payable - Officer
|
132,373
|
87,232
|
||||||
Total current liabilities
|
165,669
|
130,917
|
||||||
LONG TERM LIABILITIES
|
- | - | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
165,669
|
130,917
|
||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 400,201,154
|
||||||||
shares issued and outstanding
|
40,020
|
40,020
|
||||||
Common Stock B, $0.0001 par value 150,000,000 authorized, 6,000 issued
|
||||||||
and outstanding
|
1
|
1
|
||||||
Additional Paid in Capital
|
38,471,136
|
38,471,136
|
||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(38,663,643
|
)
|
(38,640,929
|
)
|
||||
Total Stockholders’ Deficit
|
(152,486
|
)
|
(129,772
|
)
|
||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
$
|
13,183
|
$
|
1,145
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
2
VIDABLE, INC.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Cost of Sales
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Gross Profit
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||
General and Administrative
|
20,530
|
19,333
|
||||||
OTHER INCOME / (EXPENSES)
|
||||||||
Interest Expense
|
(2,184
|
)
|
(17,813
|
)
|
||||
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
$
|
(22,714
|
)
|
$
|
(37,146
|
)
|
||
Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|||
Weighted Average Number of Shares (Common Stock and Class B Common Stock) Outstanding
|
400,207,154
|
206,059
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
3
VIDABLE, INC.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
||||||||
Net Loss
|
$
|
(22,714
|
)
|
$
|
(37,146
|
)
|
||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
||||||||
used in operating activities:
|
||||||||
Discount accretion on note
|
-
|
474
|
||||||
Accrued interest on notes payable to related party
|
2,432
|
|||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(10,389
|
)
|
32,721
|
|||||
Notes payable to officer
|
45,141
|
-
|
||||||
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities
|
12,038
|
(1,519
|
)
|
|||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds from notes payable
|
-
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Net Change in Cash
|
12,038
|
(1,519)
|
||||||
Cash Beginning of Period
|
145
|
3,945
|
||||||
Cash End of Period
|
$
|
12,183
|
$
|
2,426
|
||||
Supplemental disclosures:
|
||||||||
Cash paid for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Income Taxes
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
4
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying balance sheet as of December 31, 2011, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and the accompanying interim financial statements as of March 31, 2012, for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, have been prepared by management pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for interim financial reporting. These interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Vidable, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Vidable” or the "Company") as of and for the periods presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012 or for any other interim period during such year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on April 16, 2012.
Nature of Business
Vidable, Inc. was organized on November 5, 1998 in Nevada as USA Telecom. In 1998, the entity amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to USA Telcom, in 2000 it amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to USA Telcom Internationale, in 2004 it amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to ZannWell Inc., in January 2005, it amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to Blackhawk Fund and in June 2011 it amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to Vidable, Inc. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company was in the business of residential and commercial real estate acquisition and development. Beginning September 2011, the Company began pursuing a new business plan of establishing an online video based classified marketplace company which intends to connect merchants and customers via streaming video, mobile technology and social media. The Company intends to operate a centralized business Internet portal to allow consumers to find information about various products and services through business and consumer posted videos.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all cash on hand and in banks, including accounts in book overdraft positions, certificates of deposit and other highly- liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash and cash equivalents.
Revenue recognition
The Company has not recognized any revenue from its new business plan.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Temporary differences represent differences in the recognition of assets and liabilities for tax and financial reporting purposes, primarily accumulated depreciation and amortization.
As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the deferred tax asset is related solely to the Company’s net operating loss carry forward and is fully reserved.
Stock Split
On July 1, 2011, the Board of Directors’ of the Company effectuated a 1 to 5,000 reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock. The Company also effectuated a 1 to 30,000,000 reverse stock split of its outstanding Class B common stock. The reverse stock split did not affect the amount of authorized shares of the Company. All references in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, numbers of shares, and share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse splits, unless explicitly stated otherwise
5
Loss per share
Loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents (primarily outstanding options and warrants). Common stock equivalents represent the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of the outstanding stock options and warrants, using the treasury stock method. The calculation of fully diluted loss per share assumes the dilutive effect of the exercise of outstanding options and warrants at either the beginning of the respective period presented or the date of issuance, whichever is later. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s outstanding warrants are considered anti-dilutive.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the accounting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective September 30, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s new Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) as the single source of authoritative accounting guidance under the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) Topic. The ASC does not create new accounting and reporting guidance, rather it reorganizes GAAP pronouncements into approximately 90 topics within a consistent structure. All guidance in the ASC carries an equal level of authority. Relevant portions of authoritative content, issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for SEC registrants, have been included in the ASC. After the effective date of the Codification, all nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the ASC is superseded and deemed nonauthoritative. Adoption of the Codification also changed how the Company references GAAP in its financial statements.
In February 2010, FASBissued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-9 Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-9”). ASU 2010-9 amends disclosure requirements within Subtopic 855-10. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC's requirements. ASU 2010-9 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-09 to have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-6 Improving Disclosures about Fair Measurements (“ASU 2010-6”). ASU 2010-6 provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that require separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the presentation of separate information regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU 2010-6 provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures about the level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-6 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-06 to have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-2 Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary- a Scope Clarification (“ASU 2010-2”). ASU 2010-2 addresses implementation issues related to the changes in ownership provisions in the Consolidation—Overall Subtopic (Subtopic 810-10) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, originally issued as FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. Subtopic 810-10 establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for noncontrolling interests and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary. An entity is required to deconsolidate a subsidiary when the entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Upon deconsolidation of a subsidiary, an entity recognizes a gain or loss on the transaction and measures any retained investment in the subsidiary at fair value. The gain or loss includes any gain or loss associated with the difference between the fair value of the retained investment in the subsidiary and its carrying amount at the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated. In contrast, an entity is required to account for a decrease in ownership interest of a subsidiary that does not result in a change of control of the subsidiary as an equity transaction. ASU 2010-2 is effective for the Company starting January 1, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-2 to have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In December 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-16 Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (“ASU 2009-16”). ASU 2009-16 amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB SFAS No. 140. The amendments in ASU 2009-16 improve financial reporting by eliminating the exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. In addition, the amendments require enhanced disclosures about the risks that a transferor continues to be exposed to because of its continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. ASU 2009-16 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity's first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2009-16 to have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
6
In August 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-5 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (“ASU 2009-5”). ASU 2009-5 provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU 2009-5 clarifies that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value. ASU 2009-5 was effective for the Company for interim and annual periods ending after September 30, 2009. The adoption of ASU 2009-5 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In August 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-4 Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments—an Amendment to Section 480-10-S99 (“ASU 2009-4”). ASU 2009-4 represents a SEC update to Section 480-10-S99, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. The adoption of guidance within ASU 2009-4 did not have an impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In June 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162, (now codified within ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“ASC 105”)). ASC 105 establishes the Codification as the single source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. Following this statement, FASB will not issue new standards in the form of statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (1) update the Codification; (2) provide background information about the guidance; and (3) provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. ASC 105 was effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have an impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In May 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, (now codified within ASC 855, Subsequent Events (“ASC 855”)). ASC 855 establishes the general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. ASC 855 was effective for the Company on April 1, 2009. The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In April 2009, FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FSP 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (now codified within ASC 320, Investments—Debt and Equity Securities (“ASC 320”)). ASC 320 provides greater clarity about the credit and noncredit component of an other-than-temporary impairment event and more effectively communicates when an other-than-temporary impairment event has occurred. ASC 320 amends the other-than-temporary impairment model for debt securities. The impairment model for equity securities was not affected. Under ASC 320, an other-than-temporary impairment must be recognized through earnings if an investor has the intent to sell the debt security or if it is more likely than not that the investor will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. This standard was effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 320 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In April 2009, FASB issued FSP 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (now codified within ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). ASC 820 provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent and provides additional authoritative guidance in determining whether a market is active or inactive and whether a transaction is distressed. ASC 820 is applied to all assets and liabilities (i.e., financial and non-financial) and requires enhanced disclosures. This standard was effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In April 2009, FASB issued FSP 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (now codified within ASC 825, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825”)). ASC 825 requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. ASC 825 was effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 825 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position.
7
In June 2008, FASB issued FSP—Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (now codified within ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”)). Under ASC 260, unvested share based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. ASC 260 was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years and requires retrospective application. The adoption of ASC 260 did not have a material impact on the Company's earnings per share calculations.
In April 2008, FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (now codified within ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”)). ASC 350 provides guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset and requires enhanced disclosures so that users of financial statements are able to assess the extent to which the expected future cash flows associated with the asset are affected by our intent and/or ability to renew or extend the arrangement. ASC 350 was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 350 on January 1, 2009 did not impact the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (now codified within ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”)). ASC 815 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging activities aimed at improving the transparency of financial reporting. ASC 815 was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 815 did not have any impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (now codified within ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”)). ASC 805 establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements the fair value of identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date. ASC 805 significantly changes the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas, including the treatment of contingent consideration, preacquisition contingencies, transaction costs and restructuring costs. In addition, under ASC 805, changes in an acquired entity's deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. The provisions of this standard applied to any acquisitions completed on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 805 did not have an impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51 (now codified within ASC 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”)). ASC 810 changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which is recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method significantly changes the accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. The provisions of ASC 810 were applied to all noncontrolling interests prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which were applied retrospectively to all periods presented and have been disclosed as such in our consolidated financial statements herein. ASC 810 became effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted ASC 810 effective January 4, 2009. The adoption of ASC 810 did not have an initial material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (now codified within ASC 820). ASC 820 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. Under ASC 820, fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance within ASC 820 became effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007; however, the FASB provided a one year deferral for implementation of the standard for non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities. The Company adopted ASC 820 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities effective January 1, 2009, which did not have any effect on its results of operations or financial position.
NOTE 2 - STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company has adopted ASC 505 “Equity” and ASC 718-10 “Stock Compensation,” using the modified-prospective transition method. The standards require the measurement of compensation cost at the grant date, based upon the estimated fair value of the award, and requires amortization of the related expense over the employee’s requisite service period. Under ASC 718-10, stock based compensation cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. Beginning on January 1, 2006, any future excess tax benefits derived from the exercise of stock options will be recorded prospectively and reported as cash flows from financing activities in accordance with ASC 718-10. During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company had no stock based consulting expenses as determined under ASC 718-10.
NOTE 3 - PROPERTY - HELD FOR SALE/FIXED ASSETS
In December 2008, the Company purchased two parcels of undeveloped land in Riverside County, City of Desert Hot Springs, California, for a purchase price of a $1,000 promissory note. The land approximates 3.5 acres. This property is zoned for residential dwellings. The Company is determining whether to build finished lots or in the alternative to sell the land to a developer. The property comprised of these two parcels has not yet been entitled.
NOTE 4 - COMMON STOCK
As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had (i) 4 billion shares of its common stock authorized and 400,201,154 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and (ii) 150,000,000 shares of Class B common stock authorized and 6,000 shares issued and outstanding.
On August 19, 2008, the Company changed the par value of its common stock from $0.001 to $0.0001.
During the three months ended March 31. 2012 and 2011 the Company issued an aggregate of 0 and 2,800 shares of common stock, respectively, in connection with partial conversions of the Terminus note. (See Note 5.)
8
On July 1, 2011, the Board of Directors’ of the Company effectuated a 1 to 5,000 reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock. The Company also effectuated a 1 to 30,000,000 reverse stock split of its outstanding Class B common stock. The reverse stock split did not affect the amount of authorized shares of the Company. All references in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, numbers of shares, and share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse splits, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
On July 20, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with its president where his 10,000,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock were exchanged for 300,000,000 shares of Company common stock. The issuance was exempt pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.
On July 21, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with the holders of its Series B Preferred Stock whereby 10,000,000 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock were exchanged by such holders for 100,000,000 shares of our common stock. The issuance was exempt pursuant to Section 4(1) of the Securities Act.
NOTE 5 – PROMISSORY NOTES
On April 24, 2008, the Company and Terminus, as co-issuers, issued and sold to a single accredited investor: (i) a $550,000 due on demand secured promissory note with an interest rate of 12% per annum (“Terminus Note Payable”) and (ii) 500,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock. To secure payment of the note, Terminus pledged the 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock. The Company is a guarantor of the Terminus Note, and accordingly, has treated the note as a contingent liability and as an “off-balance sheet arrangement.”
On May 4, 2009, the Company and Terminus both defaulted on repayment of the Terminus Note. As a result of the default on the Terminus Note, the Company has become unconditionally liable for repayment of all principal and interest due under the note, has recorded the full amount of $550,000 in principal and $68,750 in accrued interest as a liability, and has incurred an expense for such amounts. In addition, the Company continues to accrue interest from the date of default.
On July 10, 2009, the Company, along with Terminus, entered into a first amendment to the Terminus Note with the holder of the note. The amended note extends the maturity date until July 10, 2010. In addition, the amendment provides that the note may be converted into shares of the Company's common stock. The conversion price for the amended note is the greater of (i) the then existing par value of the Company's common stock or (i) 75 % of the average of the per shares market values (as defined in the amended note) during the 20 trading days immediately preceding a conversion date. If at any time after September 10, 2009, there is either (i) insufficient shares of the Company's common stock to permit conversions pursuant to the amended note or (ii) the per share market value is less than the then existing par value of the Company's common stock for a period of 5 consecutive trading days, the Company will use its best efforts to amend its capital structure by means of either a reverse split of its common stock, an increase in its authorized common stock, or a reduction of the par value of its common stock, or any combination of the foregoing as determined by the Company's board of directors in its reasonable judgment. The Company has recorded a beneficial conversion feature relating to the Terminus Note in the amount of $631,033.
Subsequent to the Terminus Note amendment, the holder of the note has affected a series of partial conversions and was issued an aggregate of 42,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.001 per share. In the aggregate, these issuances reduced the debt by $210,000 in principal.
On March 19, 2010, the Company issued an 8% $50,000 convertible promissory note (“Terminus Note 2”) to the same holder of the Terminus Note. The note is due and payable on March 19, 2015. In addition, the note is convertible into shares of our common stock. The conversion price for the note is the greater of (i) the then existing par value of the Company's common stock or (i) 75 % of the average of the per shares market values (as defined in the amended note) during the 20 trading days immediately preceding a conversion date. If at any time after September 10, 2009, there is either (i) insufficient shares of the Company's common stock to permit conversions pursuant to the amended note or (ii) the per share market value is less than the then existing par value of the Company's common stock for a period of 5 consecutive trading days, the Company will use its best efforts to amend its capital structure by means of either a reverse split of its common stock, an increase in its authorized common stock, or a reduction of the par value of its common stock, or any combination of the foregoing as determined by the Company's board of directors in its reasonable judgment. The proceeds for the sale of the note were for working capital and general corporate purposes. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) and Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No discount was recorded in connection with this note.
9
On March 25, 2010, the holder of the Terminus Note effected a partial conversion and was issued 2,800 shares of common stock. The issuance reduced the debt by $5,355.
On April 5, 2010, the holder of the Terminus Note exercised a partial conversion and was issued 9,000 shares of common stock. The issuance reduced the debt by $15,345.
On July 7, 2010, the Company entered into a second amendment to the Terminus Note extending the maturity date under the note from July 10, 2010 to February 1, 2011.
The balance of the Terminus Notes at December 31, 2011 and 2010 are $0 and $369,300, respectively. The note discount related to the Terminus Note was fully amortized as of July 10, 2010.
On May 6, 2011, the Company and Terminus, Inc. entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release with Professional Offshore Opportunity Fund, Ltd. (“POOF”) pursuant to which we settled all amounts owed to POOF under outstanding promissory notes and repurchased the Series A Preferred Stock held by it in exchange for $275,000. In connection with the settlement agreement, POOF released the Series C Preferred Stock held by it to secure payment of amounts due under the April 2008 $550,000 promissory note, as amended, co-issued by us and Terminus, Inc. as well as the March 2010 promissory note issued by us. The amounts due under the April 2008 and March 2010 promissory notes was $369,300 at May 6, 2011. To record the Settlement Agreement and Release, $94,300 was recognized as a gain on debt forgiveness. Mutual releases were exchanged among the parties under the Settlement Agreement. The $275,000 payment was charged to Additional Paid in Capital as the payment was provided by Terminus, a related party.
On September 15, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement. In connection with the consulting agreement the Company issued a convertible note payable (“Consulting Note”) in the amount of $60,000. The entire principal amount is due on September 15, 2020, and the Consulting Note accrues interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 4% per annum. The holder of the Consulting Note may exercise its right to convert any portion of unpaid principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock any time after March 15, 2011 at a conversion price calculated as 85% of the average of the three per share market values of the Company’s common stock immediately preceding a conversion date. Each conversion is limited to $10,000 per calendar month. In connection with the Consulting Note, the Company recorded a note discount in the amount of $18,893.
On May 4, 2011, the consulting agreement was terminated. The convertible note payable (“Consulting Note”) in the amount of $60,000 was cancelled. The Company recorded a gain on debt forgiveness for the consulting note plus accrued interest less unamortized note discount.
NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
For the year ended December 31, 2010, Terminus, Inc., the holder of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock, loaned the Company $82,127. The loan was payable upon demand with interest at 12% per annum. This loan and all accrued interest was forgiven on May 6, 2011. At March 31, 2012 and 2011, interest accrued to this loan was $0 and $2,432, respectively.
On May 6, 2011, we, and Terminus, Inc. entered into a Settlement Agreement with Professional Offshore Opportunity Fund, Ltd. (“POOF”) pursuant to which we, and Terminus, Inc. settled all amounts owed to POOF under outstanding promissory and demand notes.
Additionally, on May 6, 2011, $101,644 of related party debt, inclusive of accrued interest was forgiven by Terminus. Since the forgiveness occurred with a related party, the Company charged additional paid in capital.
Since May 6, 2011, the sole officer and director of the Company has loaned an aggregate of $128,007 in funds to the Company. The loan is payable upon demand with interest at 8% per annum. At March 31, interest accrued to this loan was $4,367.
10
NOTE 7 – OFFICER LOAN
For the quarter ended March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, an officer of the Company has loaned aggregate funds to the Company of $128,007 and $85,050, respectively on such dates. The loan is payable upon demand with interest at 8% per annum. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, interest accrued to this loan was $4,367 and $2,182, respectively.
NOTE 8 - GOING CONCERN
The Company has incurred significant losses, has a negative capital, and negative current ratio. These factors, among others indicate that the Company may not be able to continue as a going concern. No adjustments have been made to the carrying value of assets and liabilities should the company not continue as a going concern.
NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through March 30, 2012, which is the date these financial statements were available to be issued.
11
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included in this report. This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements contained in this report that are not historic in nature, particularly those that utilize terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes,” or “plans” or comparable terminology are forward-looking statements based on current expectations and assumptions. Various risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements in this document are based on information currently available to us as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
General
We are a development stage online video classified company which will connect merchants and customers via streaming video, mobile technology and social media. We will operate a centralized business Internet portal (an online classified website) to allow consumers to find information about various products and services through business and consumer posted videos. Previously, we were known as "The Blackhawk Fund" and were engaged in the acquisition and development of real estate properties in the United States. We still hold one property in our portfolio.
Change of Control and Change in Management
On May 6, 2011, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Terminus, Inc. and Lino Luciani pursuant to which Mr. Luciani purchased 10,000,000 shares of our Series C Preferred Stock from Terminus for $300,000. As a result, the sale of the Series C Preferred Stock by Terminus to Mr. Luciani effectively transferred Terminus’ control of our company to Mr. Luciani. On July 20, 2011, we entered into an agreement with Mr. Luciani whereby his 10,000,000 shares of series C preferred stock were exchanged for 300,000,000 shares of our common stock. Mr. Luciani currently owns approximately 75% of our issued and outstanding common stock.
12
On May 6, 2011, in connection with the stock purchase agreement described above, Frank Marshik resigned as our President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary. The board of directors appointed Mr. Luciani as a director to fill a vacancy on the board of directors. The board of directors then appointed Mr. Luciani as our President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary concurrent with the closing of the stock purchase agreement. Thereafter, Mr. Marshik resigned as a director concurrent with the closing. Mr. Marshik’s resignation as a director was not based on any disagreement with us on any matter relating to our operations, policies or practices.
Plan of Operation
We intend to develop and operate a centralized business Internet portal (an online classified website) to connect merchants and customers via streaming video, mobile technology and social media. Our objectives for the next 12 months include: development of website with streaming video capability; grow user base; establish Vidable as a trusted resource for business transactions and establish base in local markets prior to expanding nationwide.
To date, we have accomplished the following activities in furtherance of our plan: In November 2011, we entered into an Exclusive Software Property, Technical Information and Trade Mark License Agreement with Vidable AG pursuant to which we received the worldwide exclusive license to all of the software, technical information and trademarks necessary to commercialize the business of and allow customers to view a video instead of a static image when viewing potential items for purchase, rent and marketing their products. In February 2012, we launched our online classified website in test market format in New York, New York.
To drive traffic to our website, we intend to enter into an agreement with a search engine optimization (SEO) company to improve the visibility of our web site or web pages in search engines such as Google, Yahoo and Bing. We intend to base part of our revenue model on selling banner ads. Over the next 12 months, we intend to build out our management team, hire a sales force, site moderator and additional site developers.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial conditions and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of financial statements requires managers to make estimates and disclosures on the date of the financial statements. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to revenue recognition. We use authoritative pronouncements, historical experience, and other assumptions as the basis for making judgments. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. A summary of our critical accounting policies can be found in the notes to our annual financial statements included this report.
Results of Operations
Basis of Presentation
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain unaudited selected financial data:
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
|
March 31,
|
|||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Costs of Sales
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
General and administrative
|
20,530
|
19,333
|
||||||
Interest Expense
|
(2,184
|
)
|
(17,813
|
)
|
||||
Net Income (Loss)
|
$
|
(22,714
|
)
|
$
|
(37,146
|
)
|
13
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
Net sales. Our revenues were $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. In February 2012, we launched our online classified website in test market format in New York, New York. We did not have any sales of any real estate properties held for development or any real estate properties generating rental revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2011 when our focus was real estate development.
Cost of Sales. Costs of sales were $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased for the three months ended March 31, 2012 at $20,530 as compared to $19,333 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase resulted primarily from a slightly increased need for professional and consulting services in the second quarter of 2012.
Interest. Interest expense decreased to $2,184 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to interest expense of $17,813 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The interest expense decrease for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was primarily attributed to the forgiveness of promissory notes during calendar year 2011.
Net income/( loss). We recognized net loss of $22,714 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to net loss of $37,146 for the three months ended March 31, 20110. The decreae in loss for the three months ended March 31, 2012 is primarily attributable to the reduction in interest expense attributed to the forgiveness of promissory notes during calendar year 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our operations, debt service, and capital requirements through cash flows generated from operations and through issuance of debt and equity securities. Our working capital deficit at March 31, 2012 was $152,486, and we had cash of $12,183 as of March 31, 2012.
14
We had $12,038 of net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to using $1,519 in the three months ended March 31, 2011. Our net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 consisted mainly of our net loss $22,714 was accompanied by a reduction of $10,389 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and an increase of $45,141 in notes payable to officer.
We generated no cash flows from investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
We generated no cash flows from financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
Capital Requirements
Our financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012 state that we have a net loss, have a negative capital, and a negative current ratio. These factors, among others indicate that we may not be able to continue as a going concern. We believe that, as of the date of this report, in order to fund our plan of operations over the next 12 months, we will need to fund operations out of cash flows generated from operations, from the borrowing of money, and from the sale of additional securities. It is possible that we will be unable to obtain sufficient additional capital through the borrowing of money or the sale of our securities as needed.
Part of our growth strategy may include diversifying into additional lines of business, forming one or more partnerships, entering into one or more joint ventures, or conducting one or more strategic acquisitions, which may require us to raise additional capital. We do not currently have binding agreements or understandings to acquire any other companies.
We intend to retain any future earnings to pay our debts, finance the operation and expansion of our business and any necessary capital expenditures, and for general corporate purposes.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
15
ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide information required by this item.
ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports that we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
At the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our former management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that all material information required to be disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q has been made known to them in a timely fashion.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has also evaluated whether any change in our internal controls occurred during the last fiscal quarter and have concluded that there were no material changes in our internal controls or in other factors that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, these controls.
16
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS
As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide information required by this item.
ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3 – DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
None.
ITEM 5 – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6 - EXHIBITS
Item
No.
|
Description
|
Method of Filing
|
||
31.1
|
Certification of Lino Luciani pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
|
Filed herewith.
|
||
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant o 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed herewith.
|
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
VIDABLE, INC.
|
|
May 15, 2012
|
/s/ Lino Luciani
|
Lino Luciani
|
|
President
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
18