Nutex Health, Inc. - Annual Report: 2009 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 000-53862
iGAMBIT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 11-3363609 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1600 Calebs Path Extension, Suite 114
Hauppauge, New York 11788
(Address of principal executive offices)
Hauppauge, New York 11788
(Address of principal executive offices)
(631) 780-7055 | ||
(Registrants telephone number) | (Registrants former telephone number) |
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of Each Class: NONE | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered: |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of the chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 126-2 of the
act): Yes o No þ
There is not currently a market for the Registrants common stock.
As of May 31, 2010, there were 23,954,056 shares of the Registrants $0.001 par value common stock
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None
iGAMBIT, INC.
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No. | ||||||||
PART I |
||||||||
Item 1 | 3 | |||||||
Item 1A | 8 | |||||||
Item 1B | 8 | |||||||
Item 2 | 8 | |||||||
Item 3 | 8 | |||||||
Item 4 | 8 | |||||||
PART II |
||||||||
Item 5 | 9 | |||||||
Item 6 | 10 | |||||||
Item 7 | 11 | |||||||
Item 7A | 14 | |||||||
Item 8 | 14 | |||||||
Item 9 | 14 | |||||||
Item 9A | 14 | |||||||
Item 9B | 15 | |||||||
PART III |
||||||||
Item 10 | 16 | |||||||
Item 11 | 17 | |||||||
Item 12 | 18 | |||||||
Item 13 | 19 | |||||||
Item 14 | 20 | |||||||
PART IV |
||||||||
Item 15 | 21 | |||||||
EX-4.2 | ||||||||
EX-4.3 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
Exhibit Index
This annual report on Form 10-K is for the year ended December 31, 2009. The Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) allows us to incorporate by reference information that we file with
the SEC, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you directly to
those documents. Information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this annual
report. In addition, information that we file with the SEC in the future will automatically update
and supersede information contained in this annual report. In this annual report, Company, we,
us and our refer to iGambit, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
2
Table of Contents
PART I
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. The Company has based these forward-looking statements on the Companys
current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are
subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us and the Companys
subsidiaries that may cause the Companys actual results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In many cases, you can
identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as anticipate, estimate, believe,
continue, could, intend, may, plan, potential, predict, should, will, expect,
objective, projection, forecast, goal, guidance, outlook, effort, target and other
similar words. However, the absence of these words does not mean that the statements are not
forward-looking. Factors that might cause or contribute to a material difference include, but are
not limited to, those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, including the section entitled
Risk Factors and the risks discussed in the Companys other Securities and Exchange Commission
filings. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited
Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
ITEM 1. | BUSINESS |
HISTORY
We were incorporated in the State of Delaware under the name BigVault.com Inc. on April 13,
2000. On April 18, 2000, we merged with BigVault.com, Inc., a New York corporation with which we
were affiliated. We survived the merger, and on December 21, 2000 changed our name to bigVAULT
Storage Technologies, Inc. At that time we were in the business of providing remote, internet-based
storage vaulting services and related ancillary services to end users and resellers (the Vault
Business).
On February 28, 2006 we sold all of our assets to Digi-Data Corporation (DDC), an unrelated
third party, pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 21, 2005 (the
APA), a copy of which is filed herewith as an exhibit. As consideration for our transfer of
assets under the APA, DDC paid certain of our liabilities and agreed to make certain quarterly and
annual revenue sharing payments to us. Specifically, DDC agreed to make quarterly payments to us,
for a period of 5 years, in the amount equal to 10% of the Vault Net Revenues received by DDC
through its operation of the Vault Business (the Quarterly Revenue Share Payments). Vault Net
Revenues is defined in the APA as the gross revenue of DDC actually received by DDC that is solely
and directly attributable to the Vault Business, to the extent that such revenue is derived from
the provision of vault services and/or vault appliances which use the Big Vault core technology,
less the sum of (i) any discount given by DDC in compensation for early payment, (ii) returns,
allowances, quantity discounts and credits, (iii) any accounting reserve amount, as determined in
accordance with GAAP, and (iv) shipping and mailing costs, duties, taxes and insurance. In
addition, DDC agreed to make an annual payment to us after the 2nd, 3rd,
4th, and 5th anniversaries of the closing of the transaction, in an amount
equal to 5% of any increase in the annual Vault Net Revenue over the immediately prior years Vault
Net Revenue (the Annual Increase Payments, and together with the Quarterly Revenue Share Payments
the Revenue Share Payments). A schedule of the Quarterly Revenue Share Payments and Annual
Increase Payments received to date is set forth below. The final Annual Increase Payment and the
final Quarterly Revenue Share Payment are each due on or before May 31, 2011. Mr. Salerno and Ms.
Luqman accepted employment with DDC in senior management positions post closing, and continued to
work for DDC until February 2009. As of March 1, 2009 Mr. Salerno and Ms. Luqman returned to their
full time management roles with the Company.
3
Table of Contents
Period Covered | Amount | Date Received | ||||
March 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 18,576.42 | 2/14/2007 | |||
1st Quarter 2007 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 20,085.64 | 7/18/2007 | |||
2nd Quarter 2007 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 54,429.29 | 9/18/2007 | |||
3rd Quarter 2007 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 81,761.49 | 12/17/2007 | |||
4th Quarter 2007 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 112,343.36 | 2/22/2008 | |||
1st Quarter 2008 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 142,403.25 | 5/1/2008 | |||
March 2007 February 2008 Annual Increase Payment |
$ | 159,190.30 | 5/1/2008 | |||
2nd Quarter 2008 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 143,815.13 | 8/9/2008 | |||
3rd Quarter 2008 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 168,844.36 | 11/10/2008 | |||
4th Quarter 2008 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 246,005.85 | 3/10/2009 | |||
1st Quarter 2009 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 286,976.65 | 6/30/2009 | |||
March 2008 February 2009 Annual Increase Payment |
$ | 222,322.00 | 6/30/2009 | |||
2nd Quarter 2009 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 325,514.21 | 9/25/2009 | |||
3rd Quarter 2009 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 365,194.95 | 12/24/2009 | |||
4th Quarter 2009 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 414,851.58 | 2/28/2010 | |||
1st Quarter 2010 Quarterly Revenue Share Payment |
$ | 472,384 | 5/26/2010 | |||
March 2009 February 2010 Annual Increase Payment |
$ | 362,202 | Anticipated in June 2010 | |||
$ | 3,596,900.20 | |||||
On April 5, 2006, we changed our name to iGambit, Inc.
On October 1, 2009, we acquired the assets of Jekyll Island Ventures, Inc., a New York
corporation doing business as Gotham Photo Company (Jekyll) through our wholly owned subsidiary
Gotham Innovation Lab, Inc., a New York corporation (Gotham). Pursuant to the terms of the Asset
Purchase Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (APAPR), we (i) issued 500,000 shares of our common
stock to Jekyll at closing; (ii) assumed $10,410.59 of Jekyll accounts payable relating to office
rent and health insurance premiums; and (iii) issued Jekyll warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares
of our common stock, at $0.01 per share, subject to a 3 year vesting schedule and the attainment by
Gotham of certain revenue targets during said 3 year period.
On December 2, 2009, we amended our Certificate of Incorporation increasing our authorized
shares of common stock to 75 million shares.
4
Table of Contents
OUR COMPANY
Introduction
We are a company focused on the technology markets. Presently we have one operating subsidiary
in the business of providing media technology services to the real estate industry. At this point
we have limited revenues consisting solely of revenues from the operation of our Gotham subsidiary
($166,661 in the 4th quarter of 2009) and the receipt of Quarterly Revenue Share
Payments and Annual Increase Payments from DDC (totaling $1,614,859.39 in 2009 ($414,851.58 of
which was paid in the first quarter of 2010), and $834,586 for the first quarter of 2010 ($362,202
of which is anticipated to be paid in June 2010 )).
Our primary focus is the acquisition of additional technology companies. We believe that the
background of our management and of our Board of Directors in the technology markets is a valuable
resource that makes us a desirable business partner to the companies that we are seeking to
acquire. When we acquire a company, we work to assume an active role in the development and growth
of the company, providing both strategic guidance and operational support. We provide strategic
guidance to our partner companies relating
to, among other things, market positioning, business model and product development, strategic
capital expenditures, mergers and acquisitions and exit opportunities. Additionally, we provide
operational support to help our partner companies manage day-to-day business and operational issues
and implement best practices in the areas of finance, sales and marketing, business development,
human resources and legal services. Once a company joins our partner company network, our
collective expertise is leveraged to help position that company to produce high-margin, recurring
and predictable earnings and generate long-term value for our stockholders.
At this point we do not have any plans or agreements to acquire any companies, have not
initiated any contact or negotiations with any possible acquisitions, and have not targeted any
possible acquisitions. Our current intention is to fund the purchase price of acquisitions through
a combination of the issuance of our common stock at closing and the issuance of common stock
purchase warrants that would become exercisable only in the event certain earn-out conditions are
satisfied by the acquired company. In addition to acquiring entire companies, we would also
consider entering into joint ventures and acquiring less than 100 percent of a target company.
Sources of target businesses
We anticipate that target business candidates will be brought to our attention from various
sources, including our management team, investment bankers, venture capital funds, private equity
funds, leveraged buyout funds, management buyout funds, consulting firms and other members of the
financial community who will become aware that we are seeking business partners via public
relations and marketing efforts, direct contact by management or other similar efforts, who may
present solicited or unsolicited proposals. Any finder or broker would only be paid a fee upon the
completion of a business combination. While we do not presently anticipate engaging the services of
professional firms that specialize in acquisitions on any formal basis, we may decide to engage
such firms in the future or we may be approached on an unsolicited basis. Our officers and
directors, as well as their affiliates, may also bring to our attention target business candidates
that they become aware of through their business contacts. While our officers and directors make no
commitment as to the amount of time they will spend trying to identify or investigate potential
target businesses, they believe that the various relationships they have developed over their
careers together with their direct inquiry, will generate a number of potential target businesses
that will warrant further investigation. In no event will we pay any of our existing officers,
directors, special advisors or stockholders or any entity with which they are affiliated any
finders fee or other compensation for services rendered to us prior to or in connection with the
completion of a business combination. In addition, none of our officers, directors, special
advisors or existing stockholders will receive any finders fee, consulting fees or any similar
fees from any person or entity in connection with any business combination involving us other than
any compensation or fees that may be received for any services provided following such business
combination.
5
Table of Contents
Selection of a target business and structuring of a business combination
Our management has virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying and selecting a
prospective target business. We expect that our management will diligently review all of the
proposals we receive with respect to a prospective target business. In evaluating a prospective
target business, our management will conduct the necessary business, legal and accounting due
diligence on such target business and will consider, among other factors, the following:
| financial condition and results of operations; | ||
| earnings and growth potential; | ||
| experience and skill of management and availability of additional personnel; | ||
| capital requirements; | ||
| competitive position; | ||
| barriers to entry into the industry; | ||
| breadth of services offered; | ||
| degree of current or potential market acceptance of the technology; | ||
| regulatory environment; and | ||
| costs associated with effecting the business combination. |
These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. Any evaluation relating to the merits of a
particular business combination will be based, to the extent relevant, on the above factors as well
as other considerations deemed relevant by our management in effecting a business combination
consistent with our business objective. In evaluating a prospective target business, we will
conduct an extensive due diligence review which will encompass, among other things, meetings with
incumbent management, where applicable, and inspection of facilities, as well as review of
financial and other information which will be made available to us.
Evaluation of the target businesss management
We would condition any acquisition on the commitment of management of the target business to
remain in place post closing. Following a business combination, we may seek to recruit additional
managers to supplement the incumbent management of the target business. We cannot assure you that
we will have the ability to recruit additional managers, or that any such additional managers will
have the requisite skills, knowledge or experience necessary to enhance the incumbent management.
Although we intend to closely scrutinize the management of a prospective target business when
evaluating the desirability of effecting a business combination, we cannot assure you that our
assessment of the target businesss management will prove to be correct.
Competition
In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business, we may encounter intense
competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours. Many of these entities
are well established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations
directly or through affiliates. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and
other resources than us and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with
those of many of these competitors, which may limit our ability to compete in acquiring certain
target businesses. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the
acquisition of a target business.
6
Table of Contents
Our Partner Company Gotham Photo Company
Products and Services
Gothams business is directed at providing media technology services to the real estate
community. The range of media services includes the exclusive Gotham EXPO Full Screen Experience.
Gotham also provides website development services, sales office technology and data interchange
services for many of the real estate firms in New York City. Gothams roster of no less than 996
client accounts includes accounts ranging from single agent accounts to large master accounts
with large firms such as Prudential Douglas Elliman and Halstead. Taking these and other master
accounts into consideration, Gotham does business with over 3,000 New York City real estate agents.
When it comes to selling real estate every broker or seller listing has to have pictures.
Utilizing the latest technology Gothams EXPO product provides a full screen listing experience.
It allows brokers and sellers to present their listing in the largest format possible while giving
the viewer control of the show. EXPO integrates images, photos, floor plans, agent and key listing
details in an engaging format that immerses the viewer. Currently, Gotham is capable of
integrating up to 16 images into a full screen presentation for any listing.
EXPO is available for all NYC realtors and will be made available nationwide within the coming
months. All systems are built on accessible web platforms that integrate quickly and seamlessly
into the agents workflow. EXPO is available on a per unit basis, as an add-on to photography
services, or on a subscription basis. We price the product on a per-unit basis at $50 per unit,
and offer subscription rates ranging from $400 per month to $2500 per month depending on the
average yearly listing volume of the subscriber. EXPO was a key factor in our securing of a
semi-exclusive media services agreement with Prudential Douglas Elliman.
In addition to natural expansion into the areas surrounding NYC, Gotham is actively working to
expand by further providing services to large accounts that exist in both Manhattan and targeted
secondary markets, and through the selective hiring of one-off service providers who are currently
operating in other markets.
Competitive Comparison
Gotham competes with others in the industry by focusing on user interaction, technology and
delivery. Gotham maintains strict standards of photography and a roster of accomplished
photographers who we engage in between their premium assignments such as fashion shoots,
architectural projects, etc.
In addition to superior media, in the opinion of management, Gothams technology tools set us
apart from our competition. For example, our expo product offering utilizes the pre-generation of a
multitude of media sets to deliver images sized perfectly for the users screen, wasting no
bandwidth or file size, thereby enabling us to maintain the speed and efficiency of the product at
an optimal level. A majority of our competitors either dont seem to employ similar measures in
their full screen product offerings or do so on a more limited basis.
Future Products and Services
Future offerings will include enhanced products that focus on social media interaction, mobile
applications and tools for realtors, as well as multi touch augmented reality technologies for
presentations, etc. Gotham will continue to expand its media offerings, integrating with and
adopting technologies as they become available.
Strategy and Implementation Summary
Gothams objective is to be a market leader in offering EXPO, Virtual Tours, and e-Brochures,
type services to the real estate industry. Gotham is currently providing services to a number
realtors and brokers in the New York Metropolitan area including, but not limited to, Prudential
Douglas Elliman, Cocoran and others. We plan to increase our marketing and client base in the NY
area and expand to other major cities and markets such as Boston, Philadelphia, Washington DC,
Chicago, etc. Within 3 years we expect to be offering our services to over 250 US metropolitan
statistical areas.
Employees
We presently have 9 total employees, all of which are full-time.
7
Table of Contents
SEC FILINGS
We are classified as a Smaller Reporting Company for the purpose of filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain Form 10-K report disclosures previously included that
are not required under the disclosure requirements of a smaller reporting company have been omitted
in this report.
Interested parties may access our public filing free of charge on the SECs EDGAR website
located at www.sec.gov.
OUR CORPORATE INFORMATION
Our principal offices are located at 1600 Calebs Path Extension, Suite 114, Hauppauge, New
York, 11788. Our telephone number is (631) 780-7055 and our fax number is (631) 656-1055. We
currently operate two corporate websites that can be found at www.igambit.com and
www.gothamphotocompany.com (the information on the foregoing websites does not form a part of this
report).
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
Not Required.
ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
Not Required.
ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES |
Our principal executive office is located in Hauppauge, New York, in an executive center,
where we lease approximately 300 square feet of office space. Monthly lease payments are
approximately $2,600 and the lease term expires June 30, 2010.
Our Gotham operations are located in New York, New York, where we lease approximately 3,000
square feet of office space. Monthly lease payments are approximately $5,000 and the lease term
expires October 31, 2010.
Our leased properties are suitable for their respective uses and are, in general, adequate for
our present needs. Our properties are subject to various federal, state, and local statutes and
ordinances regulating their operations. Management does not believe that compliance with such
statutes and ordinances will materially affect our business, financial condition, or results of
operations.
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
None.
ITEM 4. | (REMOVED AND RESERVED) |
8
Table of Contents
PART II
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
MARKET INFORMATION
To date there has not been an established public trading market in the Companys common stock.
The Companys securities are not listed on any exchange or over the counter market. The Company
does not have a ticker symbol.
HOLDERS
As of May 31, 2010, there are 23,954,056 shares of our common stock outstanding, held of
record by 149 persons. We have 2,335,000 common stock warrants outstanding, and 1,796,900 common
stock options outstanding.
As of May 31, 2010, approximately 21,737,018 shares of our common stock are eligible to be
sold under Rule 144.
DIVIDENDS
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. Any determination to pay
dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent
upon our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions
and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is not expected
to declare dividends or make any other distributions in the foreseeable future, but instead intends
to retain earnings, if any, for use in business operations.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
We currently have one equity compensation plan outstanding which is our 2006 Long Term
Incentive Plan. The Plan was adopted by our directors and approved by our stockholders on March 26,
2006. The Plan permits the award of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, and stock grants. We have reserved 10 million shares for issuance under the
Plan, plus an annual increase equal to 10% of the number of outstanding shares of our common stock
on the first day of each year, but in no event more than 15 million shares of common stock in the
aggregate. As of December 31, 2009, there were 4,798,708 shares available for issuance under the
Plan.
In addition to our 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, we have issued and outstanding compensatory
warrants to five consultants entitling the holders to purchase a total of 2,310,000 shares of our
common stock at an average exercise price of $0.75 per share. Warrants to purchase 60,000 shares
of common stock vested upon issuance, have an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and expire
December 31, 2010. Warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock vest in four equal
installments on the date of issuance (May 26, 2009) and on each of the following three
anniversaries of the date of issuance, have exercise prices ranging from $0.50 per share to $1.15
per share, and expire on May 26, 2019. Warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock vest
100,000 shares on issuance (June 1, 2009), and 50,000 shares on each of the following three
anniversaries of the date of issuance, have exercise prices ranging from $0.50 per share to $1.15
per share, and expire on June 1, 2019. The issuance of the compensatory warrants was not submitted
to our shareholders for their approval.
9
Table of Contents
The following table describes our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2009:
Number of Securities | ||||||||||||
Remaining Available | ||||||||||||
for Future Issuance | ||||||||||||
Number of Securities | under Equity | |||||||||||
to be Issued Upon | Weighted Average | Compensation Plans | ||||||||||
Exercise of | Exercise Price of | (excluding securities | ||||||||||
Outstanding Options, | Outstanding Options, | referenced in | ||||||||||
Warrants and Rights | Warrants and Rights | column (a)) | ||||||||||
Plan Category | (a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||||
Equity compensation
plans approved by
our stockholders
(1) |
1,796,900 | $ | 0.01 | 4,798,708 | ||||||||
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by our stockholders |
2,310,000 | $ | 0.75 | 0 |
(1) | Equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders consist of our 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan. |
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
In August 2009, we issued a total of 735,000 shares of our common stock to 6 individuals upon
their exercise of common stock purchase options. The foregoing securities were issued in reliance
on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, and were restricted when issued.
On May 26, 2009, we issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of our common stock to
Newbridge Securities pursuant to the terms of a consulting agreement between the Company and
Newbridge. 500,000 warrants, at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, vested upon issuance; 500,000
warrants, at an exercise price of $0.65 per share, vest on the 1 year anniversary of issuance;
500,000 warrants, at an exercise price of $0.80 per share, vest on the 2 year anniversary of
issuance; and 500,000 warrants, at an exercise price of $1.15 per share, vest on the 3 year
anniversary of issuance. The securities were issued in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act. The issued securities are restricted, and the agreements representing the securities contain a
standard restrictive legend.
On June 1, 2009, we issued warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock to Roetzel
& Andress pursuant to the terms of an engagement letter between the Company and Roetzel. 100,000
warrants, at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, vested upon issuance; 50,000 warrants, at an
exercise price of $0.65 per share, vest on the 1 year anniversary of issuance; 50,000 warrants, at
an exercise price of $0.85 per share, vest on the 2 year anniversary of issuance; and 50,000
warrants, at an exercise price of $1.15 per share, vest on the 3 year anniversary of issuance. The
securities were issued in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The issued securities are
restricted, and the agreements representing the securities contain a standard restrictive legend.
On October 1, 2009, we issued 500,000 shares of our common stock and options to purchase
1,500,000 shares of our common stock, at $0.01 per share, to Jekyll in connection with our
acquisition of the assets of Jekyll. The securities were issued in reliance on Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act. The issued securities are restricted, and the certificates representing the shares
contain a standard restrictive legend.
ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
Not Required
10
Table of Contents
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial
statements may require us to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the financial statements. We do
not currently have any estimates or assumptions where the nature of the estimates or assumptions is
material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain
matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change or the impact of the estimates and
assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material, except as described below.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For certain of the our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, and amounts due to related parties, the carrying amounts approximate
fair value due to their short maturities.
Revenue Recognition
Contingency payment income is recognized quarterly from a percentage of Digi-Datas vaulting
service revenue, and is included in discontinued operations. Our revenues from continuing
operations consist of revenues primarily from sales of products and services rendered to real
estate brokers. Revenues are recognized upon delivery of the products or services.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include checking and money
market accounts and any highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or
less.
Accounts Receivable
We analyze the collectability of accounts receivable each accounting period and adjust our
allowance for doubtful accounts accordingly. A considerable amount of judgment is required in
assessing the realization of accounts receivables, including the current creditworthiness of each
customer, current and historical collection history and the related aging of past due balances. We
evaluate specific accounts when we become aware of information indicating that a customer may not
be able to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration of its financial condition, lower
credit ratings, bankruptcy or other factors affecting the ability to render payment.
As of December 31, 2009, we had charged $65,000 of bad debts to operations for uncollectible
accounts.
Property and equipment and depreciation
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation for both financial reporting and
income tax purposes is computed using combinations of the straight line and accelerated methods
over the estimated lives of the respective assets. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we
purchased computer equipment totaling $1,864. Computer equipment is depreciated over 5 years.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred. When property and equipment are
retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from
the respective accounts and any gain or loss is credited or charged to income.
Depreciation expense of $596 and $373 was charged to operations for the years ended December
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
11
Table of Contents
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the fair market value of the common shares issued and common stock options
granted by the Company for the acquisition of Jekyll by the Companys subsidiary, Gotham. In
accordance with ASC Topic No. 350 Intangibles Goodwill and Other, the goodwill is not being
amortized, but instead will be subject to an annual assessment of impairment by applying a
fair-value based test, and will be reviewed more frequently if current events and circumstances
indicate a possible impairment. An impairment loss is charged to expense in the period identified.
If indicators of impairment are present and future cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to
recover the assets carrying amount, an impairment loss is charged to expense in the period
identified. A lack of projected future operating results from Gothams operations may cause
impairment. As Gothams marketing plan and expected core business is expected to commence later in
2010, it is too early for management to evaluate whether goodwill has been impaired. No impairment
was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2009.
Stock-Based Compensation
As of December 31, 2009, we had a stock-based employee compensation plan which we account for
applying SFAS No. 123(R) (SFAS 123(R)), Share-Based Payment. Under SFAS 123(R), we are required
to select a valuation technique or option-pricing model that meets the criteria as stated in the
standard, which includes a binomial model and the Black-Scholes model. At the present time, we
apply the Black-Scholes model. SFAS 123(R) also requires us to estimate forfeitures in calculating
the expense relating to stock-based compensation as opposed to only recognizing these forfeitures
and the corresponding reduction in expense as they occur.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax rates is recognized in the consolidated statement of income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction
iGambit is a company focused on the technology markets. Our sole operating subsidiary, Gotham
Innovation Lab, Inc., is in the business of providing media technology services to the real estate
industry. During the year ended December 31, 2009 Gotham produced approximately $166,661 of
revenue. We are focused on expanding the operations of Gotham by marketing the company to existing
and potential new clients. Currently Gotham has several proposals outstanding to franchisees of
one of its main customers, as well as other potential new clients. In addition to Gothams
operations, we receive Quarterly Revenue Share Payments and Annual Increase Payments from Digi-Data
Corporation, which are payable pursuant to the terms of an agreement under which we sold certain
assets to DDC in 2006. Payments received from DDC under the agreement totaled $1,446,014 in the
year ended December 31, 2009, and $887,236 in the three months ended March 31, 2010. We earned an
additional $362,202 under our arrangement with DDC during the three months ended March 31, 2010,
which we anticipate will be paid in June 2010. We expect that the payments from DDC, which we will
receive through February 2011, will continue to grow based upon the expansion of DDCs business.
We are also focused on acquiring or partnering with additional technology companies.
Year Ended December 31, 2009 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
Assets. At December 31, 2009, we had $1,655,228 in current assets and $1,994,608 in total
assets, compared to $985,927 in current assets and $1,450,176 in total assets as of December 31,
2008.
Liabilities. At December 31, 2009, we had total liabilities of $206,991 compared to $496,292
at December 31, 2008. Our total liabilities at December 31, 2009 consisted primarily of accounts
payable in the amount of $204,487, whereas our total liabilities as of December 31, 2008 consisted
primarily of liabilities from discontinued operations in the amount of $491,538.
12
Table of Contents
Stockholders Equity (Deficit). Our Stockholders Equity (Deficit) increased to $1,787,617 at
December 31, 2009 from $953,884 at December 31, 2008. This increase was primarily due to the
receipt of contingency payments from Digi-Data Corp. and a decrease in accumulated deficit from
$(1,204,483) at December 31, 2008, to $(758,724) at December 31, 2009.
Revenue and Net Incomes. We had revenue of $173,011 for the year ended December 31, 2009,
versus no revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, we had income from
discontinued operations (net of taxes) of $923,739 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared
to $553,363 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our net income was $445,759 for the year ended
December 31, 2009, compared to $403,393 for the year ended December 31, 2008. These increases were
due to primarily to the success of the agreement with Digi-Data Corporation. We continue to receive
10% of Digi-Datas gross Vault sales and 5% of the year to year increase. This agreement ends on
February 28, 2011.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and Administrative Expenses increased to $861,512
for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $196,589 for the year ended December 31, 2008. For the
year ended December 31, 2009 our General and Administrative Expenses consisted of corporate
administrative expenses of $167,517, legal and accounting fees of $168,095 and, consulting fees of
$114,000, and payroll expenses of $168,377. For the year ended December 31, 2008 our General and
Administrative Expenses consisted of corporate administrative expenses of $26,808, legal and
accounting fees of $23,500, and consulting fees of $146,281. The increases from the year ended
December 31, 2008 to the year ended December 31, 2009 relate primarily to: (i) salaries for
officers hired by the Company in 2009; (ii) professional costs associated with the acquisition of
certain assets of Jekyll Island Ventures, Inc., and the preparation and filing of a registration
statement with the SEC; and (iii) costs associated with the operation of our Gotham subsidiary.
Costs associated with our officers salaries and the operation of our Gotham subsidiary should
remain level going forward, subject to a material expansion in the business operations of Gotham
which would likely increase our corporate administrative expenses. Further, whereas the additional
professional fees associated with the acquisition of Jekyll Island Ventures, Inc. will not carry
over into future periods unless we engage in other acquisitions, we do anticipate an increase in
legal and accounting fees in 2010 once we become a reporting company under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, at December 31, 2009, we
had $857,074 cash and stockholders equity of
$1,787,617. At December 31, 2009 we had $1,994,608 in
total assets. We currently have two sources of revenue. First, we receive revenue from the
operation of our Gotham subsidiary, which operates the business we acquired from Jekyll Island
Ventures, Inc. in 2009. We anticipate that Gothams business and revenues will continue to grow
throughout 2010. Gotham is not currently cash flow positive. Gotham generated revenues of
$166,661 and a net loss of $(124,954) in 2009. In addition to revenues from Gotham, we receive
Quarterly Revenue Share Payments and Annual Increase Payments from Digi-Data Corporation, which are
payable pursuant to the terms of an agreement under which we sold certain assets to DDC in 2006.
Payments received from DDC under the agreement totaled $1,446,014 in the year ended December 31,
2009, and $887,236 in the three months ended March 31, 2010. We earned an additional $362,202
under our arrangement with DDC during the three months ended March 31, 2010, which we anticipate
will be paid in June 2010. We expect that the payments from DDC, which we will receive through
February 2011, will continue to grow based upon the expansion of DDCs business.
Our primary capital requirements in 2010 are likely to arise from the expansion of our Gotham
operations, and, in the event we effectuate an acquisition, from: (i) the amount of the purchase
price payable in cash at closing, if any; (ii) professional fees associated with the negotiation,
structuring, and closing of the transaction; and (iii) post closing costs. It is not possible to
quantify those costs at this point in time, in that they depend on Gothams business opportunities,
the state of the overall economy, the relative size of any target company we identify and the
complexity of the related acquisition transaction(s). We anticipate raising capital in the private
markets to cover any such costs, though there can be no guaranty we will be able to do so on terms
we deem to be acceptable. We do not have any plans at this point in time to obtain a line of
credit or other loan facility from a commercial bank.
While we believe in the viability of our strategy to improve Gothams sales volume and to
acquire companies, and in our ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances that we
will be able to fully effectuate our business plan.
We believe we will continue to increase our cash position and liquidity for the foreseeable
future. We believe we have enough capital to fund our present operations during the next 12 months.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have no off balance-sheet arrangements.
13
Table of Contents
ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Not Required.
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
The Financial Statements required by this Item 8 are included in this Report beginning on page
F-1, as follows:
F-1 | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-6 |
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
ITEM 9A(T). | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, as required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the
Exchange Act under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of
December 31, 2009. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31,
2009.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule
15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of,
our Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (our
principal accounting and financial officer), and effected by our board of directors, management and
other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that:
14
Table of Contents
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of our assets; Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and our directors; and Provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition
of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and
board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial
statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set
forth in the Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on managements
assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial reporting
is effective.
Change in Internal Controls
During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, there were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
Report of the Companys Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
This annual report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Managements report was not subject to attestation by the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit
the Company to provide only managements report in this annual report.
ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
15
Table of Contents
PART III
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Our board of directors manages our business and affairs. Under our Articles of Incorporation
and Bylaws, the Board will consist of not less than one nor more than seven directors. Currently,
our Board consists of five directors.
The names, ages, positions and dates appointed of our current directors and executive officers
are set forth below.
Name | Age | Position | Appointed | |||||
John Salerno
|
71 | Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the Board, and Director | March 2009 (appointed Chairman and Director in April 2000) | |||||
Elisa Luqman
|
45 | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Director | March 2009 (appointed Director in August 2009) | |||||
James J. Charles
|
67 | Director | March 2006 | |||||
George G. Dempster
|
70 | Director | January 2001 | |||||
John Waters
|
64 | Director | August 2009 |
John Salerno, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the Board, and Director. Mr.
Salerno is a seasoned hands-on executive with over 40 years of experience with public and private
computer software and service companies. Mr. Salerno built a multi-million dollar business from a
start up, servicing the real estate industry. The business was sold in 1984 and Mr. Salerno
provided consulting services to a wide range of clients through 1995. In 1996, along with his
daughter and a small group of private accredited investors, he co-founded the Company. Mr. Salerno
was President and CEO of the Company from April 1, 2000 until February 28, 2006. After signing
contracts with Verizon and Cablevision, the Company sold its assets in 2006 to Digi-Data
Corporation. From March 1, 2006 thru February 2009 Mr. Salerno served as President of the Vault
Services Division of Digi-Data Corporation. Upon the expiration of his 3 year contract the Vault
Services Division was at a revenue run rate of $12 million annually. As of March 1, 2009, Mr.
Salerno returned to his full time management roll at the Company. Mr. Salerno is an ex US Marine
Corps, Crypto/ Communications Officer and has a BS in Mathematics from Fordham University. Mr.
Salerno is Elisa Luqmans father.
Elisa Luqman, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and
Director. Ms. Luqman is a computer literate attorney with over 18 years experience with
intellectual property and computer software. Prior to co-founding the Company, Ms. Luqman was
president of University Software Corp., a software development company focused on a wide range of
student educational and intellectual applications. Ms. Luqman was Chief Operating Officer of
the Company, from April 1, 2000 until February 28, 2006. From March 1, 2006 through February 28,
2009 Ms. Luqman was employed as Chief Operating Officer of the Vault Services Division of Digi-Data
Corporation, the company that acquired the Companys assets in 2006, and subsequently during her
tenure with Digi-Data Corporation she became the in-house general counsel for the entire
corporation. In that capacity she was responsible for acquisitions, mergers, patents, and employee
contracts, and worked very closely with Digi-Datas outside counsel firms, DLA-Piper, the Law
Offices of Sandra T. Carr and the patent firm of Jordan and Hamburg. As of March 1, 2009, Ms.
Luqman rejoined the Company in her current capacities. Ms Luqman received a BA degree in
Marketing, a JD in Law, and a MBA Degree in Finance from Hofstra University. Ms. Luqman is a member
of the bar in New York and New Jersey. Ms. Luqman is John Salernos daughter.
James J. Charles, Director. Mr. Charles is a high profile financial executive with a broad
base of experience with firms ranging in size from $24MM to $180MM in annual revenue. He worked
closely with management and Boards of Directors on matters ranging from mergers and acquisitions to
stock restructurings and spin-offs. Mr. Charles has been a self employed Certified Public
Accountant from 1999 to present. From 1994 to 1999 Mr. Charles was the chief financial officer of
Interpharm Holdings, Inc. From 1966 to 1994 Mr. Charles was a Senior Managing Partner with Ernst &
Young. Mr. Charles education includes studies and management programs at Harvard University and
Williams College. Mr. Charles received his BBA in Accounting at Manhattan College.
George G. Dempster, Director. Mr. Dempster was Commissioner of Commerce for the State of New
York from 1979 to 1983. He served as the Chairman of the Finance Committee for Hofstra University
for 25 years from 1976 through 2001, and is currently Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees.
Mr. Dempster is currently Chairman and was the prior CEO (1983-2002) of Tran-Leisure Corp, a
diversified holding company with interests ranging from helicopter services to manufacturing. From
1969 to 1973 Mr. Dempster served as the CEO of Cybernetics, a major computer software developer.
Mr. Dempster served as a marketing manager for IBM from 1961 to 1968. Mr. Dempster has a BA in
business administration from Hofstra University.
John Waters, Director. Mr. Waters was a Senior Partner at Arthur Andersen from 1967 to 2001,
with exceptional leadership skills in mergers and acquisitions (particularly reverse mergers) and
1933 Act fillings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Waters was involved in raising
over $60 million for a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) and was that companys Chief
Financial Officer from February 2006 to April 2008. Mr. Waters serves on the audit committee and on
the board of Authentidate Holding Corp. (ADAT) since July 2004. He was previously the Chief
Administrative Officer of that company from July 2004 to December 31, 2005. He also serves on the
board of two privately held companies. My Waters is a Certified Public Accountant and has a BBA
degree from Iona College.
16
Table of Contents
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The Board has established an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee. The Board does not
currently have a Nominating Committee. The work typically conducted by a Nominating Committee is
conducted by the full Board.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee presently consists of Messrs. Charles, Waters, and Dempster, with Mr.
Charles serving as chairman. Our Board has determined that Mr. Charles qualifies as an audit
committee financial expert as defined under the federal securities laws. The Audit Committee is
responsible for monitoring and reviewing our financial statements and internal controls over
financial reporting. In addition, they recommend the selection of the independent auditors and
consult with management and our independent auditors prior to the presentation of financial
statements to stockholders and the filing of our forms 10-Q and 10-K. The Company has not adopted a
charter. When a charter is adopted, it will be posted on our web site. The Audit Committee was
established in August 2009, and thus had no meeting in 2008.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee presently consists of Messrs. Charles, Waters, and Dempster, with
Mr. Waters serving as chairman. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and
recommending to the Board the compensation and over-all benefits of our executive officers,
including administering the Companys 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee
may, but is not required to, consult with outside compensation consultants. The Compensation
Committee has not adopted a charter. When a charter is adopted, it will be posted on our web site.
The Compensation Committee was established in August 2009, and thus had no meetings in 2008.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company
under Rule 16a-3(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) the
Company is not aware of any person that failed to file on a timely basis, as disclosed in the
aforementioned Forms, reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the year ended
December 31, 2009.
CODE OF ETHICS
The Company has not adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing
similar functions.
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Effective September 1, 2009 Mr. Salerno and Ms. Luqman became full time employees of the
Company with annual salaries of $225,000 and $200,000 respectively. Prior to September 1, 2009 Mr.
Salerno and Ms. Luqman were employees of Digi-Data Corp.
During 2006 and 2007, Mr. Salerno exercised options to acquire 1,800,000 common shares of the
Company and during 2007 Ms. Luqman exercised options to acquire 1,500,000 common shares of the
Company.
17
Table of Contents
Prior to December 31, 2006, the Company was indebted to officers, John Salerno and Elisa
Luqman for unpaid compensation accrued totaling $350,000. John Salerno received advances against
the deferred compensation in the amounts of $74,281.25 and $44,000 as of December 31, 2007, and
December 31, 2008, respectively. Elisa Luqman received advances against the deferred compensation
in the amounts of $5,000 and $75,000 as of December 31, 2007, and December 31, 2008, respectively.
The advances against deferred compensation totaling $79,281 and $198,281 as of December 31, 2007,
and December 31, 2008, respectively were in the form of a note payable to the Company and were
collateralized with the officers common shares issued and outstanding of 5,470,000 shares each.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company paid the total amount of unpaid
compensation accrued to the officers, who subsequently repaid the advances received.
Current | Non-Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Officers | Incentive | Nonqualified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name & | Option | Plan | Deferred | All Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Salary | Bonus | Stock | Awards | Compensation | Compensation | Compensation | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Position | Year | ($) | ($) | ($)(1) | ($) | ($) | Earnings ($) | ($) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John Salerno |
2009 | 77,885 | (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8,739 | (2) | 86,624 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEO, President, |
2008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chairman &
Director |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elisa Luqman |
2009 | 69,231 | (3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69,231 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CFO, EVP, General |
2008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Counsel, & Director |
(1) | Does not include $200,000 in deferred compensation that was earned prior to December 31, 2006, and paid during 2009. | |
(2) | Includes $5,766 in health insurance premiums and $4,069 in life insurance premiums. | |
(3) | Does not include $150,000 in deferred compensation that was earned prior to December 31, 2006, and paid during 2009. |
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS WITH NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The Company does not currently have any employment agreements with it executive officers.
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2009, with respect to the
Companys compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for issuance.
Number of | Number of Securities | |||||||||||
Securities to | Remaining Available | |||||||||||
be Issued | Weighted-Average | for Future Issuance | ||||||||||
Upon Exercise | Exercise Price of | Under Equity | ||||||||||
of Outstanding | Outstanding | Compensation Plan | ||||||||||
Options, Warrants | Options, Warrants | (Excluding Securities | ||||||||||
Plan Category | and Rights | and Rights | Reflected in Column) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plan approved by security holders |
3,143,000 | $ | 1.14 | 2,457,000 |
| Additionally, the Company has in place an ESOP plan in which 255,000 shares of the Companys stock are held on behalf of qualifying participants. |
18
Table of Contents
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth information known to us, as of May 31, 2010, relating to the
beneficial ownership of shares of common stock by: (i) each person who is known by us to be the
beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Companys outstanding common stock; (ii) each director;
(iii) each executive officer; and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group. Under
securities laws, a person is considered to be the beneficial owner of securities owned by him (or
certain persons whose ownership is attributed to him) or securities that can be acquired by him
within 60 days, including upon the exercise of options, warrants or convertible securities. The
Company determines a beneficial owners percentage ownership by assuming that options, warrants and
convertible securities that are held by the beneficial owner and which are exercisable within 60
days, have been exercised or converted. The Company believes that all persons named in the table
have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as being
owned by them. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner in the table set
forth below is care of iGambit, Inc., 1600 Calebs Path Extension, Suite 114, Hauppauge, New York,
11788. The percentages in the following table are based upon 23,954,056 shares outstanding as of
May 31, 2010.
Amount and Nature | ||||||||
of Beneficial | ||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner | Ownership | Percent of Class | ||||||
John Salerno, C.E.O., President, Chairman of the Board, and Director |
5,616,900 | (1) | 23.3 | % | ||||
Elisa Luqman, C.F.O., Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Director |
5,715,000 | (2) | 23.9 | % | ||||
James J. Charles, Director |
441,000 | 1.8 | % | |||||
George G. Dempster, Director |
392,000 | 1.6 | % | |||||
John Waters, Director |
-0- | * | ||||||
Mehul Mehta |
2,450,000 | 10.2 | % | |||||
Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (5): |
12,164,900 | 50.5 | % |
* | Less than 1.0% | |
1. | Includes: options to purchase 46,900 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share held by John L. Salerno, Mr. Salernos son; and options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share held by Dean T. Salerno, Mr. Salernos son. | |
2. | Includes 245,000 shares of common stock held by Muhammad Luqman, Ms. Luqmans husband. |
ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to the terms of the agreements governing the sale of our assets to DDC in 2006, we
will continue to receive Revenue Share Payments from DDC until 2011. In connection with said asset
sale, Mr. Salerno and Ms. Luqman entered into employment
agreements with DDC and worked for DDC until those agreements terminated in February 2009.
Notwithstanding the termination of said employment agreements, Mr. Salerno is entitled, pursuant to
the terms thereof, to receive a share of the net proceeds of any sale or other disposition of all
or substantially all of the stock or assets of DDC that occurs on or before February 2011.
Director George Dempster was engaged as an Independent Consultant to Digi-Data Corporation
from the period June 1, 2006 through April 30, 2009. The Company agreed to share equally in the
fees paid to Mr. George Dempster. From the period of February 2006 through February 2009 George
Dempster was paid $179,448 directly from Digi-Data. The $89,724 representing the Companys 50%
share of that expense was deducted by Digi-Data from amounts Digi-Data owed to the Company.
Prior to December 31, 2006, the Company was indebted to officers, John Salerno and Elisa
Luqman for unpaid compensation accrued totaling $350,000. John Salerno received advances against
the deferred compensation in the amounts of $74,281.25 and $44,000 as of December 31, 2007, and
December 31, 2008, respectively. Elisa Luqman received advances against the deferred compensation
in the amounts of $5,000 and $75,000 as of December 31, 2007, and December 31, 2008, respectively.
The advances against deferred compensation totaling $79,281 and $198,281 as of December 31, 2007,
and December 31, 2008, respectively, were in the form of a note payable to the Company and were
collateralized with the officers common shares issued and outstanding of 5,470,000 shares each.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company paid the total amount of unpaid
compensation to the officers, who subsequently repaid the advances received.
19
Table of Contents
BOARD INDEPENDENCE
The Company has elected to use the independence standards of the NYSE AMEX Equities Exchange
in its determination of whether the members of its Board are independent. Based on the foregoing,
the Company has concluded that Mr. Charles, Mr. Waters, and Mr. Dempster are independent. The Board
has established an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee. The Board does not currently have
a Nominating Committee. The work typically conducted by a Nominating Committee is conducted by the
full Board.
ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
The following table shows what Michael F. Albanese, CPA billed for the audit and other
services for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Year Ended | Year Ended | |||||||
12/31/ 2009 | 12/31/08 | |||||||
Audit Fees |
$ | 14,000 | $ | 25,000 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees |
| | ||||||
Tax Fees |
| | ||||||
All Other Fees |
| | ||||||
Total |
$ | 14,000 | $ | 25,000 |
Audit Fees This category includes the audit of the Companys annual financial
statements, review of financial statements included in the Companys Form 10-Q Quarterly Reports
and services that are normally provided by the independent auditors in connection with engagements
for those years.
Audit-Related Fees This category includes assurance and related services by the
independent auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the
Companys financial statements and that are not reported under the caption Audit Fees.
Tax Fees This category includes services rendered by the independent auditor for
tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.
All Other Fees This category includes products and services provided by the
independent auditor other than the services reported under the captions Audit Fees,
Audit-Related Fees, and Tax Fees.
Overview
The Companys Audit Committee, reviews, and in its sole discretion
pre-approves, our independent auditors annual engagement letter including proposed fees and all
audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. Accordingly, all services
described under Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees, and All Other Fees were
pre-approved by our Companys Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may not engage the independent
auditors to perform the non-audit services proscribed by law or regulation. The Companys Audit
Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to a member of the Board of Directors, and authority
delegated in such manner must be reported at the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors.
20
Table of Contents
PART IV
ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) Financial Statements
F-1 | ||
F-2 | ||
F-3 | ||
F-4 | ||
F-5 | ||
F-6 |
(b) Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
2.1 | Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and Digi-Data Corporation, dated December 21, 2005 (1) |
|||
2.2 | Asset Purchase Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between Jekyll Island Ventures Inc. and Gotham
Innovation Lab Inc., dated September 30, 2009 (1) |
|||
3.1 | (i) | Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 13, 2000 (1) |
||
3.1(ii) | Certificate of Merger, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 18, 2000 (1) |
|||
3.1(iii) | Certificate of Amendment Changing Name, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 19, 2000 (1) |
|||
3.1(iv) | Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on February 17, 2006 (1) |
|||
3.1 | (v) | Certificate of Amendment Changing Name filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 5, 2006 (1) |
||
3.1(vi) | Certificate of Amendment Increasing Authorized Common Stock to 75 Million Shares, filed with the Delaware
Secretary of State on December 2, 2009 (1) |
|||
3.2 | Bylaws (1) |
|||
4.1 | Form of Stock Certificate (2) |
|||
4.2 | Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Newbridge Securities |
|||
4.3 | Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Roetzel & Andress |
|||
10.1 | iGambit, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, Amended 12/31/2006 (1) |
|||
10.2 | Newbridge Consulting Agreement (2) |
|||
10.3 | Employment Agreement between Digi-Data Corporation and Mr. Salerno (2) |
|||
10.4 | Employment Agreement between Digi-Data Corporation and Mrs. Luqman (2) |
|||
10.5 | Agreement between the Company and Digi-Data Corporation regarding the payment of consulting fees to Mr.
Dempster (2) |
|||
21 | Subsidiaries (1) |
|||
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(This exhibit shall not be deemed filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be
deemed incorporated by reference into any other filing under the Security Act of 1933, as amended, or by
the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.) |
|||
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(This exhibit shall not be deemed filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 as amended or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be
deemed incorporated by reference into any other filing under the Security Act of 1933, as amended, or by
the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.) |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to Form 10 filed on December 31, 2009. | |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Form 10 filed on June 11, 2010. |
21
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Haupauge, New
York, on June 15, 2010.
iGAMBIT, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ John Salerno | |||
John Salerno, Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Annual
Report on Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated:
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ John Salerno
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director | June 15, 2010 | ||
/s/ Elisa Luqman
|
Chief Financial Officer and Director | June 15, 2010 | ||
/s/ James J. Charles
|
Director | June 15, 2010 | ||
/s/ George G. Dempster
|
Director | June 15, 2010 | ||
/s/ John Waters
|
Director | June 15, 2010 |
22
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of:
iGambit Inc.
I have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of iGambit Inc. as of
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and the related statements of income,
changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. My responsibility
is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing
the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating
the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a
reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of iGambit Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years
then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.
The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
/s/ Michael F. Albanese, CPA
Parsippany, NJ
Parsippany, NJ
May 6, 2010
F-1
Table of Contents
IGAMBIT INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 857,074 | $ | 322,439 | ||||
Accounts receivable |
56,743 | | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
8,838 | | ||||||
Notes receivable stockholders |
17,000 | 17,000 | ||||||
Assets from discontinued operations |
715,573 | 646,488 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,655,228 | 985,927 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
895 | 1,491 | ||||||
Other assets |
||||||||
Notes receivable stockholders |
| 198,281 | ||||||
Goodwill |
185,000 | | ||||||
Deposits |
2,500 | | ||||||
Assets from discontinued operations |
150,985 | 264,477 | ||||||
Total other assets |
338,485 | 462,758 | ||||||
$ | 1,994,608 | $ | 1,450,176 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 204,487 | $ | 4,754 | ||||
Loans payable stockholders |
2,504 | | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
206,991 | 4,754 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities |
||||||||
Liabilities from discontinued operations |
| 491,538 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
206,991 | 496,292 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value; authorized - 75,000,000 shares in 2009 and 30,000,000 in 2008; issued and outstanding - 23,954,056 shares in 2009 and 22,719,056 in 2008 |
23,954 | 22,719 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
2,522,387 | 2,135,648 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(758,724 | ) | (1,204,483 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,787,617 | 953,884 | ||||||
$ | 1,994,608 | $ | 1,450,176 | |||||
F-2
Table of Contents
IGAMBIT INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Sales |
$ | 173,011 | $ | | ||||
Cost of sales |
47,458 | | ||||||
Gross profit |
125,553 | | ||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
861,512 | 196,589 | ||||||
Loss from operations |
(735,959 | ) | (196,589 | ) | ||||
Other income |
||||||||
Interest income |
3,908 | 2,554 | ||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income tax benefit |
(732,051 | ) | (194,035 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit |
(254,071 | ) | (44,065 | ) | ||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(477,980 | ) | (149,970 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations (net of taxes of $806,898
and $361,286) |
923,739 | 553,363 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 445,759 | $ | 403,393 | ||||
Basic and fully diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (.02 | ) | $ | (.01 | ) | ||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
$ | .04 | $ | .03 | ||||
Net earnings per common share |
$ | .02 | $ | .02 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
23,009,029 | 22,402,104 | ||||||
F-3
Table of Contents
IGAMBIT INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
Additional | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Totals | ||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2007 |
21,737,018 | $ | 21,737 | $ | 1,987,749 | $ | (1,607,876 | ) | $ | 401,610 | ||||||||||
Compensation for vested stock options |
| | 72,900 | | 72,900 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued in consideration
of cashless exercise of options,
valued at $.01 per share |
788,100 | 788 | 7,093 | | 7,881 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued in exercise
of warrants, valued at $.01 per share |
60,000 | 60 | 540 | | 600 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued in exercise
of warrants, valued at $.50 per share |
135,000 | 135 | 67,365 | | 67,500 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock retired |
(1,062 | ) | (1 | ) | 1 | | | |||||||||||||
Net income |
403,393 | 403,393 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2008 |
22,719,056 | 22,719 | 2,135,648 | (1,204,483 | ) | 953,884 | ||||||||||||||
Compensation for vested stock options |
| | 67,500 | | 67,500 | |||||||||||||||
Compensation for vested warrants |
| | 54,000 | | 54,000 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued in consideration
of cashless exercise of options,
valued at $.01 per share |
735,000 | 735 | 6,765 | | 7,500 | |||||||||||||||
Assets of acquired business |
| | 73,974 | | 73,974 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued in business
acquisitions |
500,000 | 500 | 49,500 | | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||
Stock options granted for acquired
business resulting in goodwill |
135,000 | 135,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
445,759 | 445,759 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2009 |
23,954,056 | $ | 23,954 | $ | 2,522,387 | $ | (758,724 | ) | $ | 1,787,617 | ||||||||||
F-4
Table of Contents
IGAMBIT INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 445,759 | $ | 403,393 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided (used) by operating activities
|
||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
(923,739 | ) | (553,363 | ) | ||||
Depreciation |
596 | 373 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
121,500 | 72,900 | ||||||
Cashless exercises of stock options |
7,500 | 7,881 | ||||||
Assets of acquired business |
73,974 | | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in cash flows as a result of
changes in asset and liability account balances: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(56,743 | ) | | |||||
Prepaid expenses |
(8,838 | ) | | |||||
Accounts payable |
(199,733 | ) | 2,095 | |||||
Net cash used by continuing operating activities |
(140,258 | ) | (66,721 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operating activities |
29,665 | 187,811 | ||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
(110,593 | ) | 121,090 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
| (1,864 | ) | |||||
Increase in deposits |
(2,500 | ) | | |||||
Repayments of loans to stockholders |
198,281 | (126,000 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided (used) by continuing investing activities |
195,781 | (127,864 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by discontinued investing activities |
938,481 | 434,811 | ||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
1,134,262 | 306,947 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Loans from shareholders |
2,504 | | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants |
| 68,100 | ||||||
Net cash provided by continuing financing activities |
2,504 | 68,100 | ||||||
Net cash used by discontinued financing activities |
(491,538 | ) | (214,605 | ) | ||||
NET CASH USED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(489,0334 | ) | (146,505 | ) | ||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH |
534,635 | 281,532 | ||||||
CASH BEGINNING OF YEAR |
322,439 | 40,907 | ||||||
CASH END OF YEAR |
$ | 857,074 | $ | 322,439 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 1,189 | $ | | ||||
Income taxes |
4,698 | 67 | ||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 121,500 | $ | 72,900 | ||||
Cashless exercise of common stock options |
7,500 | 7,881 | ||||||
Common stock issued in business acquisition resulting in goodwill |
50,000 | | ||||||
Stock options granted in business acquisition resulting in goodwill |
135,000 | |
F-5
Table of Contents
IGAMBIT INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Organization and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements presented are those of iGambit Inc., (the Company) and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Gotham Innovation Lab Inc. (Gotham). The Company was incorporated under
the laws of the State of Delaware on April 13, 2000. The Company was originally incorporated as
Compusations Inc. under the laws of the State of New York on October 2, 1996. The Company changed
its name to BigVault.com Inc. upon changing its state of domicile on April 13, 2000. The Company
changed its name again to bigVault Storage Technologies Inc. on December 22, 2000 before changing
to iGambit Inc. on July 18, 2006. Gotham was incorporated under the laws of the state of New York
on September 23, 2009.
Business Acquisition
The Company acquired 200 no par value common shares of Gotham for $100. Subsequent to the
acquisition of the Companys newly formed subsidiary, Gotham, on October 1, 2009 Gotham acquired
all of the assets and business operations of Jekyll Island Ventures Inc. doing business as Gotham
Photo Company (Jekyll) for 500,000 shares of the Companys common stock at a value of $.10 per
share, and for 1,500,000 options to purchase the Companys common stock over a three year period at
a value of $.09 per share. Jekyll is a developer of web based software solutions for the real
estate industry in the areas of marketing real estate. Subsequent to the acquisition, Jekyll
dissolved and distributed its shares of the Companys common stock to the shareholders of Jekyll.
Gotham maintained Jekylls d/b/a name of Gotham Photo Company. The assets acquired from Jekyll are
as follows:
Cash |
$ | 4,023 | ||
Accounts receivable |
66,958 | |||
Fixed assets |
2,993 | |||
$ | 73,974 | |||
F-6
Table of Contents
Following is a presentation of pro forma balance sheets and statements of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008:
Nine months ended September 30, 2009:
Pro Forma Balance Sheets
iGambit | Jekyll | Combined | ||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 1,371,447 | $ | 70,981 | $ | 1,442,428 | ||||||
Fixed assets |
1,044 | 2,993 | 4,037 | |||||||||
Other assets |
153,209 | | 153,209 | |||||||||
Total assets |
1,525,700 | 73,974 | 1,599,674 | |||||||||
Current liabilities |
2,121 | | 2,121 | |||||||||
Long-term liabilities |
| | | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,121 | | 2,121 | |||||||||
Stockholders equity |
1,523,579 | 73,974 | 1,597,553 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,525,700 | $ | 73,974 | $ | 1,599,674 | ||||||
Pro Forma Statements of Operations
iGambit | Jekyll | Combined | ||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | | $ | 249,925 | $ | 249,925 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
| 43,151 | 43,151 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
| 206,774 | 206,774 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
418,772 | 208,965 | 627,737 | |||||||||
Loss from operations |
(418,772 | ) | (2,191 | ) | (420,963 | ) | ||||||
Other income |
7,435 | | 7,435 | |||||||||
Income tax benefit |
107,059 | | 107,059 | |||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(304,278 | ) | (2,191 | ) | (306,469 | ) | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
744,973 | | 744,973 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 440,695 | $ | (2,191 | ) | $ | 438,504 | |||||
F-7
Table of Contents
Year ended December 31, 2008:
Pro Forma Balance Sheets
iGambit | Jekyll | Combined | ||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 985,927 | $ | 80,650 | $ | 1,066,577 | ||||||
Fixed assets |
1,491 | | 1,491 | |||||||||
Other assets |
462,758 | | 462,758 | |||||||||
Total assets |
1,450,176 | 80,650 | 1,530,826 | |||||||||
Current liabilities |
4,754 | 3,929 | 8,683 | |||||||||
Long-term liabilities |
491,538 | | 491,538 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
496,292 | 3,929 | 500,221 | |||||||||
Stockholders equity |
953,884 | 76,721 | 1,030,605 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,450,176 | $ | 80,650 | $ | 1,530,826 | ||||||
Pro Forma Statements of Operations
iGambit | Jekyll | Combined | ||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | | $ | 359,590 | $ | 359,590 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
| 62,100 | 62,100 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
| 297,490 | 297,490 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
123,689 | 280,198 | 403,887 | |||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(123,689 | ) | 17,292 | (106,397 | ) | |||||||
Other income |
2,554 | | 2,554 | |||||||||
Income tax benefit |
44,065 | | 44,065 | |||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(77,070 | ) | 17,292 | (59,778 | ) | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
553,363 | | 553,363 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 476,293 | $ | 17,292 | $ | 493,585 | ||||||
Merger Transaction
On December 19, 2005, the Company executed a certificate of merger whereby BigVault Inc. (a Nevada
corporation) merged into the Company leaving the Company as the surviving corporation. Pursuant to
the certificate of merger, each share of Big Vault Inc.s common stock issued and outstanding was
converted to one share of the Companys common stock.
Note 2 Discontinued Operations
Sale of Business
On February 28, 2006, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Digi-Data
Corporation (Digi-Data), whereby Digi-Data acquired the Companys assets and its online digital
vaulting business operations in exchange for $1,500,000, which was deposited into an escrow account
for payment of the Companys outstanding liabilities. In addition, as part of the sales agreement,
the Company receives payments from Digi-Data based on 10% of the net vaulting revenue payable
quarterly over five years. The Company is also entitled to an additional 5% of the increase in net
vaulting revenue over the prior years revenue. These adjustments to the sales price are included
in the discontinued operations line of the statements of income.
F-8
Table of Contents
The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations are presented in the balance sheets under
the captions Assets of discontinued operations and Liabilities of discontinued operations. The
underlying assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations for the years ended December 31
are as follows:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 713,732 | $ | 367,430 | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 279,058 | ||||||
Noncurrent: |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
150,985 | 165,727 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 98,750 | ||||||
Assets of discontinued operations |
$ | 864,717 | $ | 910,965 | ||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Noncurrent: |
||||||||
Prepaid contingency |
$ | | $ | 141,538 | ||||
Deferred compensation |
| 350,000 | ||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
$ | | $ | 491,538 | ||||
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable includes 50% of contingency payments earned for the previous quarter.
Restricted Cash
An escrow account was established in connection with the sale of business to Digi-Data to hold
funds for contingent liabilities. Under the terms of the sale, 25% of the quarterly contingency
payments are deposited into the escrow account for a period of three years. Also under the terms
of the sale, 50% of the balance of the escrow funds held will be released after three years, and
the remaining balance released after two more years. The escrow account balance was $150,985 and
$165,727 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Prepaid Contingency
Prepaid contingency includes cash and expenses advanced by Digi-Data prior to the sale. The
balance is being repaid with 25% of quarterly contingency payments earned that is retained by
Digi-Data. The prepaid contingency balance was $0 and $141,538 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Deferred Compensation
The Company was indebted to two former officers for unpaid compensation totaling $350,000 at
December 31, 2008. The officers received advances against the deferred compensation totaling
$198,281 as of December 31, 2008. In 2009, compensation was fully repaid to the former officers
who subsequently repaid the advances against the deferred compensation.
F-9
Table of Contents
Note 3 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Gotham Innovation Lab, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reporting amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For certain of the Companys financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, and amounts due to related parties, the carrying amounts approximate
fair value due to their short maturities.
Revenue Recognition
Contingency payment income is recognized quarterly from a percentage of Digi-Datas vaulting
service revenue, and is included in discontinued operations.
The Companys revenues from continuing operations consists of revenues primarily from sales of
products and services rendered to real estate brokers. Revenues are recognized upon delivery of
the products or services.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include checking and money market
accounts and any highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less.
Accounts Receivable
The Company analyzes the collectability of accounts receivable each accounting period and adjusts
its allowance for doubtful accounts accordingly. A considerable amount of judgment is required in
assessing the realization of accounts receivables, including the current creditworthiness of each
customer, current and historical collection history and the related aging of past due balances.
The Company evaluates specific accounts when it becomes aware of information indicating that a
customer may not be able to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration of its financial
condition, lower credit ratings, bankruptcy or other factors affecting the ability to render
payment. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has charged $65,000 of bad debts to operations for
uncollectible accounts.
a. Property and
equipment and depreciation
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation for both financial reporting and income
tax purposes is computed using combinations of the straight line and accelerated methods over the
estimated lives of the respective assets. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company
purchased computer equipment totaling $1,864. Computer equipment is depreciated over 5 years.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred. When property and equipment are
retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from
the respective accounts and any gain or loss is credited or charged to income.
F-10
Table of Contents
Depreciation expense of $596 and $373 was charged to operations for the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the fair market value of the common shares issued and common stock options
granted by the Company for the acquisition of Jekyll by the Companys subsidiary, Gotham. In
accordance with ASC Topic No. 350 Intangibles Goodwill and Other), the goodwill is not being
amortized, but instead will be subject to an annual assessment of impairment by applying a
fair-value based test, and will be reviewed more frequently if current events and circumstances
indicate a possible impairment. An impairment loss is charged to expense in the period identified.
If indicators of impairment are present and future cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to
recover the assets carrying amount, an impairment loss is charged to expense in the period
identified. A lack of projected future operating results from Gothams operations may cause
impairment. As Gothams marketing plan and expected core business is expected to commence later in
2010, it is too early for management to evaluate whether goodwill has been impaired. No impairment
was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2009.
Stock-Based Compensation
As of December 31, 2009, the Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan which it accounts
for applying SFAS No. 123(R) (SFAS 123(R)), Share-Based Payment. Under SFAS 123(R), the Company
is required to select a valuation technique or option-pricing model that meets the criteria as
stated in the standard, which includes a binomial model and the Black-Scholes model. At the present
time, the Company applies the Black-Scholes model. SFAS 123(R) also requires the Company to
estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense relating to stock-based compensation as opposed to
only recognizing these forfeitures and the corresponding reduction in expense as they occur.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax rates is recognized in the consolidated statement of income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
Note 4 Earnings Per Common Share
The Company calculates net earnings (loss) per common share in accordance with ASC 260 Earnings
Per Share (ASC 260). Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per common share was determined by
dividing net earnings (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. The Companys potentially dilutive shares, which
include outstanding common stock options and common stock warrants, have not been included in the
computation of diluted net earnings (loss) per share for all periods as the result would be
anti-dilutive.
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Stock options |
1,796,900 | 1,046,900 | ||||||
Common stock warrants |
3,085,000 | 835,000 | ||||||
Total shares excluded from calculation |
4,881,900 | 1,881,900 | ||||||
F-11
Table of Contents
Note 5 Stock Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based award programs, including grants of stock
options and warrants, is recorded in accordance with CompensationStock Compensation, Topic 718
of the FASB ASC. Stock-based compensation expense, which is calculated net of estimated
forfeitures, is computed using the grant date fair-value method on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period for all stock awards that vest during the period. The grant date fair
value for stock options is calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Determining
the fair value of options at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected
term that stock options will be outstanding prior to exercise, the associated volatility and the
expected dividends. Stock-based compensation expense is reported under general and administrative
expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
In 2006, the Company adopted the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan). Awards granted
under the 2006 plan have a ten-year term and may be incentive stock options, non-qualified stock
options or warrants. The awards are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on
the date of grant and generally vest over a three or four year period. Effective January 1, 2006,
we recognized compensation expense ratably over the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures.
As of December 31, 2009, there was approximately $148,500 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2006 plan. This cost
is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.42 years.
The 2006 Plan provides for the granting of options to purchase up to 5,510,000 shares of common
stock. 5,213,100 options have been exercised to date. There are 1,796,900 options outstanding
under the 2006 Plan.
Warrant activity during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 follows:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | |||||||||||||||
Average | Contractual | |||||||||||||||
Average | Grant-Date | Life | ||||||||||||||
Warrants | Exercise Price | Fair Value | (Years) | |||||||||||||
Warrants outstanding
at January 1, 2008 |
1,652,518 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.10 | |||||||||||
Granted during 2008 |
60,000 | 0.01 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||
Exercised during 2008 |
(195,000 | ) | 0.35 | 0.10 | ||||||||||||
Expired during 2008 |
(682,518 | ) | 0.32 | 0.10 | ||||||||||||
Warrants outstanding
at December 31, 2008 |
835,000 | 0.99 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||
Granted during 2009 |
2,250,000 | 0.77 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||
Warrants outstanding
at December 31, 2009 |
3,085,000 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 0.10 | 7.07 | ||||||||||
Stock Option Plan activity during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 follows:
F-12
Table of Contents
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | |||||||||||||||
Average | Contractual | |||||||||||||||
Average | Grant-Date | Life | ||||||||||||||
Warrants | Exercise Price | Fair Value | (Years) | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding
at January 1, 2008 |
1,835,000 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.10 | |||||||||||
Exercised during 2008 |
(788,100 | ) | 0.01 | 0.10 | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding
at December 31, 2008 |
1,046,900 | 0.01 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||
Exercised during 2009 |
(750,000 | ) | 0.01 | 0.10 | ||||||||||||
Granted during 2009 |
1,500,000 | 0.01 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding
at December 31, 2009 |
1,796,900 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.10 | 5.85 | ||||||||||
The fair value of warrants and options granted is estimated on the date of grant based on the
weighted-average assumptions in the table below. The assumption for the expected life is based on
evaluations of historical and expected exercise behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based on
the U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the
expected life at the grant date. The historical stock volatility of the Companys common stock is
used as the basis for the volatility assumption.
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Weighted average risk free rate |
4.87 | % | 4.64 | % | ||||
Average expected life in years |
6.6 | % | 5.8 | % | ||||
Expected dividends |
None | None | ||||||
Volatility |
20.0 | % | 20.0 | % | ||||
Forfeiture rate |
0 | % | 0 | % |
Note 6 Common Stock Issued
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 500,000 common shares in exchange for
the asset acquisition of Jekyll Island Ventures Inc. by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gotham
Innovation Labs Inc. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2009, options were exercised for
735,000 shares of common stock, valued at $.01 per share.
On December 2, 2009, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation to increase the number of
authorized common shares to 75,000,000.
Dividends may be paid on outstanding shares as declared by the Board of Directors from time to
time. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote.
F-13
Table of Contents
Note 7 Income Taxes
The tax provision at December 31 consists of the following:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
From operations: |
||||||||
Continuing operations: |
||||||||
Current tax expense (benefit): |
$ | $ | ||||||
Federal |
(254,578 | ) | (46,228 | ) | ||||
State and local |
507 | 2,163 | ||||||
(254,071 | ) | (44,065 | ) | |||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit): |
| | ||||||
Total from continuing operations |
(254,071 | ) | (44,065 | ) | ||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||
Current tax expense (benefit): |
||||||||
Federal |
128,827 | | ||||||
State and local |
45,773 | | ||||||
174,600 | | |||||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit): |
||||||||
Federal |
508,622 | 285,370 | ||||||
State and local |
123,676 | 75,916 | ||||||
632,298 | 361,286 | |||||||
Total from discontinued operations |
806,898 | 361,286 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 552,827 | $ | 317,221 | ||||
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rate follows:
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Statutory tax rate |
34.0 | % | 34.0 | % | ||||
Effect of
State income taxes, net of
Federal income tax benefit |
5.3 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||
Effective tax rate |
39.5 | % | 39.5 | % | ||||
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the future tax consequences of
events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. The differences relate
primarily to net operating loss carryovers and to deferred compensation. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are calculated based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using the currently enacted tax rates in effect during the years in which
the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current,
depending on the classification of the assets and liabilities to which they relate.
The Companys provision for income taxes differs from applying the statutory U.S. federal income
tax rate to income before income taxes. The primary differences result from providing for state
income taxes and from deducting certain expenses for financial statement purposes but not for
federal income tax purposes.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes (FAS 109), a valuation allowance is established based on the future recoverability
of deferred tax assets. This assessment is based upon consideration of available positive and
negative evidence, which includes, among other
things, the Companys most recent results of operations and expected future profitability.
Management has determined that no valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is necessary
at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
F-14
Table of Contents
The deferred tax assets included in assets from discontinued operations in the accompanying balance
sheets includes the following at December 31:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Current: |
$ | $ | ||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
| 279,058 | ||||||
Non-current: |
||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
| | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
| 98,750 | ||||||
$ | | $ | 377,808 | |||||
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (SFAS 109). This interpretation clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a companys financial statements in
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 details how companies should
recognize, measure, present, and disclose uncertain tax positions that have been or are expected to
be taken. As such, financial statements will reflect expected future tax consequences of uncertain
tax positions presuming the taxing authorities full knowledge of the position and all relevant
facts. FIN 48 will not have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.
Note 8 Risks and Uncertainties
Contingency Payment Income Discontinued Operations
The discontinued operations of contingency payments received from Digi-Data is the Companys sole
source of income. Should Digi-Data not achieve sufficient vaulting revenue or continue to exist,
substantial doubt would be raised as to the Companys ability to continue to exist, as the Company
has no other source of revenue.
Uninsured Cash Balances
Substantially all amounts of cash accounts held at financial institutions are insured by the FDIC.
Note 9 Related Party Transactions
Notes Receivable Stockholders
The Company provided loans to a stockholder totaling $17,000 and $10,000 at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The loans bear interest at a rate of 6% and are due on December 31, 2009.
Accrued interest on the note was $1,020 and $698 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The Company provided advances to two stockholders and former officers totaling $198,281 and $79,281
as of December 31, 2008, against their respective deferred compensation balances. The advances to
the stockholders were collateralized with their common shares issued and outstanding of 5,470,000
shares each. The former officers repaid the advances to the Company during the year ended December
31, 2009.
Loans Payable Stockholders
Two stockholders of the Company who are also former stockholders of Jekyll provided advances to
Gotham for expenses totaling $2,504 at December 31, 2009. The loans from the stockholders do not
bear interest and are payable on demand.
F-15
Table of Contents
Lease Commitment
iGambit Inc. entered into an operating lease for office space for a term of 12 months effective
June 1, 2009. Monthly rent under the lease is $2,600.
Gotham has an operating lease for office space renewable annually on October 16 at a monthly rent
of $5,500.
Rent expense of $32,100 was charged to operations for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies
The Company provides accruals for all direct costs associated with the estimated resolution of
contingencies at the earliest date at which it is deemed probable that a liability has been
incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated.
Note 11 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 105-10-05, which
provides for the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) to become the single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation
of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The Codification does not change GAAP, but
combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically organized online database. ASC
105-10-05 explicitly recognizes rules and interpretative releases of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) under Federal securities laws as authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
Subsequent revisions to GAAP will be incorporated into the Codification through Accounting
Standards Updates (ASU). ASC 105-10-05 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009, and was effective for the Company in the third quarter of 2009. The adoption of
ASC 105-10-05 impacted the Companys financial statement disclosures, as all references to
authoritative accounting literature were updated to and in accordance with the Codification.
In February 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard now codified within ASC 805, Business
Combinations that amends the provisions related to the initial recognition and measurement,
subsequent measurement, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a
business combination. The standard applies to all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination that arise from contingencies that would be within the scope of ASC 450,
"Contingencies", if not acquired or assumed in a business combination, except for assets or
liabilities arising from contingencies that are subject to specific guidance in ASC 805. The
standard applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
The adoption of the standard by the Company was effective January 1, 2009 and did not have an
impact on the Companys financial position and results of operations.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures". This pronouncement defines fair value, establishes a hierarchal
disclosure framework for measuring fair value, and requires expanded disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of this statement apply to all financial instruments that are being
measured and reported on a fair value basis. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the
remaining provisions of ASC Topic 820 that were delayed by the issuance of ASC Section 820-10-55,
"Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures: Overall: Implementation Guidance and Illustrations.
In April 2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard now codified within ASC 350,
"Intangibles-Goodwill and Other which amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible
asset. Under this standard, entities estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
must consider their historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the
absence of historical experience, must consider assumptions that market participants would use
about renewal or extension. The intent of the standard is to improve the consistency between the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure
the fair value of the asset. Adoption of the
standard was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, The Company adopted the standard on
January 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the standard to have a material impact on its
accounting for future acquisitions of intangible assets.
F-16
Table of Contents
In November 2008, the FASB issued an accounting now standard codified within ASC 350,
"Intangibles-Goodwill and Other that applies to defensive assets which are acquired intangible
assets which the acquirer does not intend to actively use, but intends to hold to prevent its
competitors from obtaining access to the asset. The standard clarifies that defensive intangible
assets are separately identifiable and should be accounted for as a separate unit of accounting in
accordance with guidance provided within ASC 805, Business Combinations and ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures". The standard was effective for intangible assets acquired in fiscal
years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted this standard effective January
1, 2009 and will apply the provisions of this guidance to intangible assets acquired on or after
that date. The Company does not expect the standard to have a material impact on its accounting for
future acquisitions of intangible assets.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard now codified within ASC 825, Financial
Instruments that requires disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments that are not
reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value whenever summarized financial
information for interim reporting periods is presented. Entities are required to disclose the
methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments and
describe changes in methods and significant assumptions, if any, during the period. The standard
was effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 and was adopted by the
Company in the second quarter of 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard now codified within ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures", which provides guidance on determining fair value when there is no
active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales, The standard
reaffirms the objective of fair value measurement, which is to reflect how much an asset would be
sold for in an orderly transaction. It also reaffirms the need to use judgment to determine if a
formerly active market has become inactive, as well as to determine fair values when markets have
become inactive. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15,
2009 and was adopted by the Company in the second quarter of 2009.
In May 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard now codified within ASC 855, Subsequent
Events", which sets forth general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial
statements were issued or were available to be issued. The standard was effective for interim or
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and was adopted by the Company in the second quarter of
2009. In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09 (ASU 2010-09)
"Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements".
This ASU amends FASB Codification topic 855. The amendments in ASU 2010-09 removes the requirement
in ASC 855-10 for a SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. This ASU was effective upon issuance and
the Company adopted this ASU as of December 31, 2009. Except for the removal of disclosure
requirements in ASC 855-10, the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures -
Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value". The ASU provides additional guidance for the fair value
measurement of liabilities under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The ASU provides
clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical
liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using certain
techniques. The ASU also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting
entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the
existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of a liability. It also clarifies that both a
quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted
price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments
to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level fair value measurements. The Company
adopted the ASU in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2009.
F-17
Table of Contents
The adoption of the pronouncements above did not have a material effect on the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Effective
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements,
(amendments to ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition) (ASU 2009-13) and ASU 2009-14, Certain
Arrangements that Include Software Elements, (amendments to ASC Topic 985, Software) (ASU
2009-14). ASU 2009-13 requires entities to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated
selling prices of the delivered goods and services based on a selling price hierarchy. The
amendments eliminate the residual method of revenue allocation and require revenue to be allocated
using the relative selling price method. ASU 2009-14 removes tangible products from the scope of
software revenue guidance and provides guidance on determining whether software deliverables in an
arrangement that includes a tangible product are covered by the scope of the software revenue
guidance. ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 should be applied on a prospective basis for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June
15,2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the
adoption of these ASUs on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by
Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, which amends ASC 810, Consolidation to
address the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. The standard also
replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has
a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on
identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity
and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity.
This standard also requires continuous reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary
beneficiary of a VIE whereas previous accounting guidance required reconsideration of whether an
enterprise was the primary beneficiary of a VIE only when specific events had occurred. The
standard provides more timely and useful information about an enterprises involvement with a
variable interest entity and will be effective as of the beginning of interim and annual reporting
periods that begin after November 15, 2009, which for the Company would be January 1, 2010. The
Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on its consolidated
results of operations and financial condition.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-6, Improving Disclosures About Fair Value
Measurements", which provides amendments to ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
including requiring reporting entities to make more robust disclosures about (1) the different
classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs
used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements including information on purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and
3. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except
for Level 3 reconciliation disclosures, which are effective for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
The FASB updated ASC Topic 810, Consolidations, and ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing", which
significantly changed the accounting for transfers of financial assets and the criteria for
determining whether to consolidate a variable interest entity (VIE). The update to ASC Topic 860
eliminates the qualifying special purpose entity (QSPE) concept, establishes conditions for
reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale, clarifies the financial asset
de-recognition criteria, revises how interests retained by the transferor in a sale of financial
assets initially are measured, and removes the guaranteed mortgage securitization
re-characterization provisions. The update to ASC Topic 810 requires reporting entities to evaluate
former QSPEs for consolidation, changes the approach to determining a VIEs primary beneficiary
from a mainly quantitative assessment to an exclusively qualitative assessment designed to identify
a controlling financial interest, and increases the frequency of required reassessments to
determine whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The Company does not expect the
adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
F-18