Oblong, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2006 March (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x |
Quarterly
report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2006.
|
or
o |
Transition
report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
|
Commission
file number: 0-25940
GLOWPOINT,
INC.
(Exact
Name of registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware
(State
or other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
77-0312442
(I.R.S.
Employer Number)
|
225
Long Avenue, Hillside, New Jersey 07205
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
312-235-3888
(Issuer’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
o
No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
Yes
o
No
x
The
number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock as of May 14, 2006
was 46,289,673.
GLOWPOINT,
INC
Index
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2006 (unaudited) and December
31,
2005*
|
1
|
|
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months
ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005
|
2
|
|
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months
Ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005
|
3
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
4
|
|
|
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
13
|
|
|
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
18
|
|
|
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
|
18
|
|
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
|
19
|
|
|
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
19
|
|
|
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
19
|
|
|
Item
3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
|
19
|
|
|
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
19
|
|
|
Item
5. Other Information
|
19
|
|
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
19
|
|
|
Signatures
|
20
|
|
|
Certifications
|
21
|
* The
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2005 has been derived
from
the audited consolidated financial statements filed as an exhibit to our Report
on Form 8-K on February 27, 2007.
i
GLOWPOINT,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except par value)
March
31, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
870
|
$
|
2,023
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $149 and
$145;
respectively
|
2,028
|
2,171
|
|||||
Receivable
for proceeds of 10% Notes
|
5,197
|
—
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
425
|
510
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
8,520
|
4,704
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
3,712
|
4,117
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
933
|
216
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
13,165
|
$
|
9,037
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
2,408
|
$
|
1,586
|
|||
Accrued
expenses
|
3,417
|
1,961
|
|||||
Accrued
sales taxes and regulatory fees
|
3,385
|
3,063
|
|||||
Current
portion of derivative financial instruments
|
4,030
|
1,246
|
|||||
Deferred
revenue
|
316
|
374
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
13,556
|
8,230
|
|||||
Long
term liabilities:
|
|||||||
Derivative
financial instruments, less current portion
|
1,811
|
324
|
|||||
10%
Convertible notes, net of discount of $3,424
|
2,241
|
—
|
|||||
Total
long term liabilities
|
4,052
|
324
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
17,608
|
8,554
|
|||||
Preferred
stock, $.0001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized and redeemable;
0.120
Series B shares issued and outstanding, (stated value of $2,888;
liquidation value of $3,474 and $3,388, respectively)
|
2,888
|
2,888
|
|||||
Stockholders’
deficit:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $.0001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 46,086 and
46,086
shares issued and issuable; 46,046 and 46,046 shares outstanding,
respectively
|
5
|
5
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
160,769
|
160,219
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(167,865
|
)
|
(161,833
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
compensation
|
—
|
(556
|
)
|
||||
(7,091
|
)
|
(2,165
|
)
|
||||
Less:
Treasury stock, 40 shares at cost
|
(240
|
)
|
(240
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ deficit
|
(7,331
|
)
|
(2,405
|
)
|
|||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
|
$
|
13,165
|
$
|
9,037
|
|||
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
1
GLOWPOINT,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
4,721
|
$
|
4,202
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
3,486
|
3,686
|
|||||
Gross
margin
|
1,235
|
516
|
|||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
Research
and development
|
271
|
313
|
|||||
Sales
and marketing
|
729
|
923
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
4,653
|
3,214
|
|||||
Total
operating expense
|
5,653
|
4,450
|
|||||
Loss
from operations
|
(4,418
|
)
|
(3,934
|
)
|
|||
Other
expense (income):
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
1,638
|
—
|
|||||
Interest
income
|
(4
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
(Decrease)
increase in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
(23
|
)
|
42
|
||||
Gain
on settlement with Gores
|
—
|
(379
|
)
|
||||
Total
other expense (income), net
|
1,611
|
(340
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss
|
(6,029
|
)
|
(3,594
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(85
|
)
|
(89
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock deemed dividends
|
—
|
(1,282
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(6,114
|
)
|
$
|
(4,965
|
)
|
|
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders per share:
|
|||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares:
|
|||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
46,046
|
39,100
|
|||||
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
GLOWPOINT,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from Operating Activities:
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(6,029
|
)
|
$
|
(3,594
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
526
|
570
|
|||||
Other
expense recognized for the (decrease) increase in the estimated
fair value
of the derivative financial instruments
|
(23
|
)
|
43
|
||||
Beneficial
conversion feature for 10% Notes
|
1,586
|
—
|
|||||
Gain
on settlement with Gores
|
—
|
(379
|
)
|
||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
297
|
189
|
|||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash attributable to changes in assets and
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
143
|
(163
|
)
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
85
|
99
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
6
|
(3
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
822
|
(26
|
)
|
||||
Accrued
expenses, sales taxes and regulatory fees
|
1,613
|
21
|
|||||
Deferred
revenue
|
(58
|
)
|
210
|
||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,032
|
)
|
(3,033
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from Investing Activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from discontinued operations, including escrowed cash
|
—
|
3,087
|
|||||
Purchases
of property, equipment and leasehold improvements
|
(121
|
)
|
(295
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(121
|
)
|
2,792
|
||||
Cash
flows from Financing Activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock and warrants
|
—
|
9,389
|
|||||
Proceeds
from exercise of warrants and options, net
|
—
|
73
|
|||||
Payments
on capital lease obligations
|
—
|
(35
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
—
|
9,427
|
|||||
(Decrease)
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,153
|
)
|
9,186
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
2,023
|
4,497
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
870
|
$
|
13,683
|
|||
Supplement
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the period for
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
53
|
|||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
$
|
85
|
$
|
89
|
|||
Deferred
financing costs for 10% Notes incurred by issuance of placement
agent
warrants
|
279
|
—
|
|||||
Proceeds
from March 2006 financing not yet received
|
5,179
|
—
|
|||||
Preferred
stock deemed dividends
|
—
|
1,282
|
|||||
Conversion
of Series B convertible preferred stock to common stock
|
—
|
2,000
|
|||||
Equity
issued as consideration for accrued preferred stock
dividends
|
—
|
183
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
GLOWPOINT,
INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2006
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2006
(Unaudited)
Note
1 -
Basis of Presentation
The
Business
Glowpoint,
Inc. ("Glowpoint" or "we" or "us"), a Delaware corporation, is a premiere
broadcast-quality, IP (Internet Protocol)-based managed video services provider.
We offer a vast array of managed video services, including video application
services, managed network services, IP and ISDN videoconferencing services,
multi-point conferencing (bridging), technology hosting and management, and
professional services. We provide these services to a wide variety of companies,
from large enterprises and governmental entities to small and medium-sized
businesses. Glowpoint is exclusively focused on high quality two-way video
communications and has been supporting millions of video calls since its
launch
in 2000. We have bundled some of our managed services to offer video
communication solutions for broadcast/media content acquisition and for video
call center applications. Recently, with the advent of HD (High Definition)
Telepresence solutions, we have combined various components of our features
and
services into a comprehensive “white glove” service offering that can support
any of the telepresence solutions on the market today.
Liquidity
and Going Concern
Our
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we
will
continue as a going concern. We have incurred recurring operating losses
and
negative operating cash flows since our inception including a net loss
attributable to common stockholders of $6,114,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. At March 31, 2006, we had a working capital deficit of
$5,036,000. We had $870,000 in cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2006.
We
had net cash used in operations of $1,032,000 for the three months ended
March
31, 2006. Additionally, the 10% Senior Secured Convertible Notes (see Note
5)
mature in September 2007. These factors raise substantial doubt as to our
ability to continue as a going concern. In March 2006 we implemented a corporate
restructuring plan designed to reduce certain operating, sales and marketing
and
general and administrative costs (see Note 8). We raised capital in March
2006,
but continue to sustain losses and negative operating cash flows. Assuming
we
realize all of the savings from our restructured operating activities, assuming
we are able to negotiate favorable terms with the authorities regarding our
sales and use taxes and regulatory fees and assuming we are able to renegotiate
or refinance the 10% Senior Secured Convertible Notes , we believe that our
available capital as of March 31, 2006 will enable us to continue as a going
concern through March 31, 2007. There are no assurances, however that we
will be
able to raise additional capital as needed, or upon acceptable terms nor
any
assurances that we will be able renegotiate the terms and maturity date of
the
10% Notes. If we are unable to renegotiate the maturity of the 10% Notes
or
issue new securities on favorable terms to repay them, it would have a material
adverse effect on the Company. The accompanying financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from this uncertainty.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Quarterly
Financial Information and Results of Operations
The
financial statements as of March 31, 2006 and for the three months ended
March
31, 2006 and 2005, are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include
all
adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to
present fairly the financial position as of March 31, 2006, and the results
of
operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.
The results for the three months ended March 31, 2006 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. While management
of the Company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate to make
the
information not misleading, these consolidated financial statements should
be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the footnotes
thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to Form 8-K on February 27, 2007.
4
See
“Note
2 - Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to Form 8-K
on
February 27, 2007 for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary
in
the Company’s accounting for sales taxes and regulatory fees, concentration of
credit risk, lives of property and equipment, income taxes and fair value
of
financial instruments. There have been no changes to our critical accounting
policies in the three months ended March 31, 2006. Critical accounting policies
and the significant estimates made in accordance with them are regularly
discussed with our Audit Committee.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Glowpoint
and our wholly owned subsidiaries, GP Communications LLC, AllComm Products
Corporation and VTC Resources, Inc. All material inter-company balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Certain
amounts from 2005 have been reclassified to conform to the 2006
presentation.
Use
of Estimates
Preparation
of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at
the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts
could differ from the estimates made. We continually evaluate estimates used
in
the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for reasonableness.
Appropriate adjustments, if any, to the estimates used are made prospectively
based upon such periodic evaluation. The significant areas of estimation
include
determining the allowance for doubtful accounts, deferred tax valuation
allowance, sales and use tax obligations, regulatory fees and related penalties
and interest, the estimated life of customer relationships, the estimated
lives
of property and equipment and the fair value of derivative financial
instruments.
Revenue
Recognition
We
recognize subscription revenue when the related services have been performed.
Revenues billed in advance are deferred until the revenue has been earned.
Other
service revenue, including amounts related to surcharges charged by our
carriers, related to the Glowpoint managed network service and the multi-point
video and audio bridging services are recognized as service is provided.
As the
non-refundable, upfront activation fees charged to the subscribers do not
meet
the criteria as a separate unit of accounting, they are deferred and recognized
over the twenty-four month period estimated life of the customer relationship.
Revenues derived from other sources are recognized when services are provided
or
events occur.
Long-Lived
Assets
We
evaluate impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations, primarily
fixed assets, when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value
of
the assets might not be recoverable in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144 “Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.
For
purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, the undiscounted
cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are compared to the
carrying amounts of those assets. If and when the carrying values of the
assets
exceed their fair values, the related assets will be written down to fair
value.
In the 2006 period, no impairment losses were indicated or
recorded.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The
Company’s objectives in using debt related derivative financial instruments are
to obtain the lowest cash cost source of funds within a targeted range of
variable to fixed-rate debt obligations. Derivatives are recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets at fair value based on the criteria specified
in
SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”.
The estimated fair value of the derivative liabilities is calculated using
the
Black-Scholes formula where applicable and such estimates are revalued at
each
balance sheet date with changes in value recorded as other income or
expense.
5
Related
Party Transactions
The
Company receives consulting and tax services from an accounting firm in which
one of our directors is a partner. Management believes that such transactions
are at arm’s-length and for terms that would have been obtained from
unaffiliated third parties. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005,
we incurred fees for these services of $0 and $10,000,
respectively.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting
for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments".
SFAS
No. 155 amends SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140, and addresses issues raised
in
SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, "Application
of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial
Assets”.
SFAS No.
155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the
beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after September 15,
2006.
The Company does not believe it will be materially affected by the adoption
of
SFAS No. 155.
In
June
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation Number (“FIN”) 48, "Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109",
regarding accounting for, and disclosure of, uncertain tax positions. FIN
No. 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprise's financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
"Accounting
for Income Taxes."
FIN 48
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected
to be
taken in a tax return. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. FIN No. 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. The Company does not believe its results of operations
and financial position will be materially affected by the adoption of FIN
No.
48.
In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, "Considering
the Effects on Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements".
SAB No.
108 requires registrants to quantify errors using both the income statement
method (i.e. iron curtain method) and the rollover method and requires
adjustment if either method indicates a material error. If a correction in
the
current year relating to prior year errors is material to the current year,
then
the prior year financial information needs to be corrected. A correction
to the
prior year results that are not material to those years would not require
a
"restatement process" where prior financials would be amended. SAB No. 108
is
effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. We have adopted
SAB
No. 108 and it did not have a material effect on our financial position,
results
of operations or cash flows.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair
Value Measurements",
to
define fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and expand disclosures about
fair
value measurements. SFAS No. 157 will be effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007, the beginning of the Company's 2008 fiscal year.
The
Company is assessing the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on
the
Company's financial position and results of operations.
Note
2 - Stock-Based Compensation
We
periodically grant stock options to employees and directors in accordance
with
the provisions of our stock option plans, with the exercise price of the
stock
options being set at the closing market price of the common stock on the
date of
grant. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment
(“SFAS
No. 123R”) which requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment
transactions be recognized as an expense in the financial statements and
that
measurement of that cost be based on the estimated fair value of the equity
or
liability instrument issued. Under SFAS No. 123R, the pro forma disclosures
previously permitted under SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation
(“SFAS
No. 123”) are no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition. SFAS
No. 123R also requires that forfeitures be estimated and recorded over the
vesting period of the instrument.
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, as permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company accounted for
share-based payments to employees using the intrinsic value method under
the
recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees
(“APB
25”), and related interpretations. Under this method, compensation cost is
measured as the amount by which the market price of the underlying stock
exceeds
the exercise price of the stock option at the date at which both the number
of
options granted and the exercise price are known. As previously permitted
by
SFAS No. 123, the Company had elected to apply the intrinsic-value-based
method
of accounting under APB No. 25 described above, and adopted only the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 123 which were similar in most respects to SFAS
No.
123R, with the exception of option forfeitures, which, under SFAS No. 123,
had
been accounted for as they occurred.
6
The
Company has adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method which
requires that share-based expense recognized includes: (a) earned share-based
expense for all awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of the adoption
date and (b) earned share-based expense for all awards granted subsequent
to the
adoption date. Since the modified prospective application method is being
used,
there is no cumulative effect adjustment upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R,
and
the Company’s December 31, 2005 financial statements do not reflect any restated
amounts. No modifications were made to outstanding options prior to the adoption
of SFAS No. 123R, and the Company did not change the quantity, type or payment
arrangements of any share-based payments programs.
The
Company uses the same valuation methodologies and assumptions in estimating
the
fair value of options under both SFAS No. 123R and the pro forma disclosures
under SFAS No. 123.
Stock
options or warrants issued in return for services rendered by non-employees
are
accounted for using the fair value based method. The following table illustrates
the effect on net loss attributable to common shareholders and net loss per
share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 if the fair value based method
using the Black-Scholes model at the grant date had been applied to all awards:
(in thousands except per share data):
Three
|
||||
Months
|
||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders, as reported
|
$
|
(4,965
|
)
|
|
Add:
stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported
net
loss.
|
155
|
|||
Deduct:
total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under
the fair
value based method
|
(439
|
)
|
||
Pro
forma net loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(
5,249
|
)
|
|
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders per share:
|
||||
Basic
and diluted - as reported herein
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted - pro forma
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
The
pro
forma effect of applying SFAS No. 123R may not be representative of the effect
on reported net income in future years because options vest over several
years
and varying amounts are generally made each year.
The
weighted average fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005:
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
4.3%
|
|
4.3%
|
|
|||
Expected
option lives
|
5
Years
|
5
Years
|
|||||
Expected
volatility
|
96.1%
|
|
101.1%
|
|
|||
Estimated
forfeiture rate
|
30%
|
|
20%
|
|
|||
Expected
dividend yields
|
None
|
None
|
|||||
Weighted
average grant date fair value of options
|
|
$0.45
|
|
$1.57
|
Expected
volatility was calculated using the historical volatility of the appropriate
industry sector index. The expected term of the options is estimated based
on
the Company’s historical exercise rate and forfeiture rates are estimated based
on employment termination experience. The risk free interest rate is based
on
U.S. Treasury yields for securities in effect at the time of grants with
terms
approximating the term of the grants. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes
option valuation model are highly subjective, and can materially affect the
resulting valuation.
7
A
summary
of options granted, exercised, expired and forfeited under our plans and
options
outstanding as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2006 with respect
to
all outstanding options is as follows (options in thousands):
Outstanding
|
Exercisable
|
||||||||||||
|
Number
of Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Number
of Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||
Options
outstanding, January 1, 2006
|
4,996
|
$
|
2.51
|
3,613
|
$
|
2.92
|
|||||||
Granted
|
77
|
0.60
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Expired
|
(1
|
)
|
3.86
|
||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(282
|
)
|
1.34
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding, March 31, 2006
|
4,790
|
$
|
2.54
|
4,071
|
$
|
2.76
|
At
March
31, 2006, there was $565,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related
to
non-vested options granted prior to January 1, 2006 that are expected to
be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.13 years. The Company has
recorded $297,000 related to its stock-based compensation in general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2006. There
was no
income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation for the three
months
ended March 31, 2006. No compensation costs were capitalized as part of the
cost
of an asset.
Note
3 - Loss Per Share
Basic
loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share for the three months
ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 is the same as basic loss per share. Potential shares
of
common stock associated with 20,777,000 and 14,780,000 outstanding options
and
warrants, 1,699,000 and 1,301,000 shares issuable upon the conversion of
our
Series B convertible preferred stock and 11,330,000 and 0 shares issuable
upon
conversion of the March 2006 10% Senior Secured Convertible Notes as of March
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, have been excluded from the calculation
of
diluted loss per share because the effects would be anti-dilutive.
Note
4
- Stockholders’ Deficit
In
January 2004, in exchange for the cancellation and termination of convertible
debentures with an aggregate face value of $4,888,000 and forfeiture of any
and
all rights of collection, claim or demand under the debentures, we agreed
to
give the holders of the debentures: (i) an aggregate of 203.667 shares of
series
B convertible preferred stock; (ii) an aggregate of 250,000 shares of restricted
common stock; and (iii) a reduction of the exercise price of the warrants
issued
pursuant to the original purchase agreement from $3.25 to $2.75. The investors
have anti-dilution rights. As a result of subsequent financings, the conversion
price of the Series B convertible preferred stock and the exercise price
of the
warrants have been adjusted to $1.70 and $1.88, respectively, as of March
31,
2006. We recognized deemed dividends of $115,000 in the three months ended
March
31, 2005.
In
February 2004, we raised net proceeds of $12,480,000 in a private placement
of
6,100,000 shares of our common stock at $2.25 per share. The registration
rights
agreement for the February 2004 financing provides for liquidated damages
of 3%
of the aggregate purchase price for the first month and 1.5% for each subsequent
month if we failed to register the common stock and the shares of common
stock
underlying the warrants or maintain the effectiveness of such registration.
We
account for the registration rights agreement as a separate freestanding
instrument and account for the liquidated damages provision as a derivative
liability subject to SFAS No. 133. The estimated fair value of the derivative
liability is based on estimates of the probability and costs expected to
be
incurred and such estimates are revalued at each balance sheet date with
changes
in value recorded as other income or expense. Approximately $1,164,000 of
the
proceeds of the financing was attributed to the estimated fair value of the
derivative liability. We estimated the fair value of the derivative liability
to
be $1,547,000 and $1,570,000 as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
We
recognized other income of $23,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006
and
an expense of $42,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 based on
changes
in the estimated fair value.
8
In
March
2005, we raised net proceeds of $9,376,000 in a private placement of 6,766,667
shares of our common stock at $1.50 per share. Investors in the private
placement were also issued warrants to purchase 2,706,667 shares of common
stock
at an exercise price of $2.40 per share. As a result of the March 2006
financing, the exercise price of the warrants have been adjusted to $1.82
as of
March 31, 2006. The warrants expire five years after the closing date. The
warrants are subject to certain anti-dilution protection.
In
March
2005, 83.333 shares of our outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock
and
accrued dividends of $183,000 were exchanged for 1,333,328 shares of our
common
stock and warrants to purchase 533,331 shares of our common stock with an
excess
aggregate fair value of $1,167,000. We recognized deemed dividends of $1,167,000
during the 2005 period in connection with the warrants and a reduced conversion
price, which were offered as an inducement to convert.
Note
5 - 10% Senior Secured Convertible Notes
10%
Senior Secured Convertible Notes and 10% Note Discount
In
March
2006, we issued our 10% Senior Secured Convertible Notes (“10% Notes”) in a
private placement to private investors. Activity for the 10% Notes and 10%
Notes
Discount during the year ended, and as of March 31, 2006, was as follows
(in
thousands):
Total
|
|||||||
Principal
of 10% Notes:
|
|||||||
March
2006 financing
|
$
|
5,665
|
|||||
Discount:
|
|||||||
Derivative
financial instrument - Series A Warrants
|
(2,708
|
)
|
|||||
Reduction
of exercise price and extension of expiration dates of
warrants
|
(716
|
)
|
|||||
(3,424
|
)
|
||||||
Accretion
of discount
|
—
|
||||||
(3,424
|
)
|
||||||
10%
Notes, net of discount
|
$
|
2,241
|
In
the
March 2006 transactions, we issued $5,665,000 of our 10% Notes, Series A
warrants to purchase 5,665,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price
of
$0.65 per share and Series B warrants to purchase 5,565,000 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The proceeds of $5,197,000,
net
of financing costs deducted at closing, were received in April and are shown
as
a current asset on the balance sheet. Both warrants are subject to certain
anti-dilution protection. The Series B warrants only become exercisable after
we
make available to the public our financial statements for the fourth quarter
of
2006 if we fail to achieve positive operating income, excluding restructuring
and non-cash charges as identified on Schedule A of the Series B warrants,
as
amended. In addition, the Series B warrants will be cancelled if we consummate
a
strategic transaction or repay the 10% Notes prior to the date we make our
consolidated financial statements for the fourth quarter of 2006 available
to
the public. We also agreed to reduce the exercise price of 3,625,000 previously
issued warrants held by the investors in this offering to $0.65 from a weighted
average price of $3.38, and to extend the expiration date of any such warrants
to no earlier than three years after the offering date. The new weighted
average
expiration date of the warrants will be 3.5 years from a previous weighted
average expiration date of 2.9 years. In addition, we issued to Burnham Hill
Partners placement agent warrants to purchase 618,000 shares of our common
stock
at an exercise price of $0.55 per share. The warrants are subject to certain
anti-dilution protection. The $5,123,000 net proceeds of the March 2006
financings are being used to support our corporate restructuring program
and for
working capital.
9
The
10%
Notes bear interest at 10% per annum and are convertible into common stock
at a
conversion rate of $0.50 per share. The Notes mature on September 30, 2007.
We
have the option to pay the accrued interest for the 10% Notes in cash or
additional 10% Notes. The Series A and Series B warrants are exercisable
for a
period of 5 years.
We
accounted for the reduction of the exercise price of 3,625,000 previously
issued
warrants held by the investors in this offering to $0.65 from a weighted
average
price of $3.38, and the extension of the expiration date of any such warrants
to
no earlier than three years after the offering date at fair value as a debt
discount with an offsetting credit to paid in capital. A portion of the finance
costs of the 10% Notes in March 2006 will be allocated to this transaction
and
charged to paid in capital. The estimated fair value of this modification
is
based on the excess of the fair value of these warrants at the date of the
financings over the fair value of these warrants under their original terms.
In
the March 2006 financings $716,000 of the proceeds was attributed to the
estimated fair value of the modification of price and term of these warrants.
The $716,000 fair value of this modification will be treated as a discount
of
the Note and expensed, using the imputed interest method, over the 18 month
period to the Note’s maturity date.
Financing
Costs
The
financing costs, which were included in the other assets in the accompanying
balance sheets, and accumulated amortization as of March 31, 2006, are as
follows (in thousands):
March
2006
|
||||
Cash
financing costs:
|
||||
Placement
agent fees - Burnham Hill Partners
|
$
|
440
|
||
Other
financing costs
|
105
|
|||
545
|
||||
Non-cash
financing costs:
|
||||
Placement
agent warrants - Burnham Hill Partners
|
279
|
|||
Financing
costs charged to additional paid in capital
|
(101
|
)
|
||
Total
financing costs
|
$
|
723
|
The
financing costs are being amortized over the 18 month period through September
30, 2007, the maturity date of the 10% Notes.
Our
financing costs related to the March 2006 financings were comprised of cash
and
non-cash charges. Our cash financing costs related to the issuance of the
10%
Notes in March 2006 were $545,000, a portion of which represents
placement fees of $440,000 to Burnham Hill Partners,
our placement agent. Our non-cash financing costs were based on the fair
value of various components of the transactions. These included the
convertibility of the 10% Notes (beneficial conversion feature), the issuance
of
the Series A warrants, modifications to previously issued warrants held by
investors in the financing and the issuance to the placement agent of warrants.
A portion of the finance costs of the 10% Notes in March 2006, $101,000,
was
allocated to the $716,000 fair value of the modification of warrant exercise
prices and extension of expirations dates for 3,625,000 previously issued
warrants held by the investors in this offering.
The
issuance to Burnham Hill Partners of placement agent warrants to purchase
618,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.55 per share
was
valued at $279,000 for the March 2006 financings. As a result of the issuance
of
the placement agent warrants we recognized Additional Paid in Capital of
$279,000.
10
Accounting
for Conversion Feature and Series A Warrant Derivative
Liabilities
Activity
for derivative liabilities during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and December
31, 2005, was as follows (in thousands):
Dec.
31, 2005
|
Additions
|
Decrease
in Fair Value
|
Mar.
31, 2006
|
||||||||||
Derivative
financial instrument - February 2004 capital raise
|
$
|
1,570
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
$
|
1,547
|
||||
Derivative
financial instrument - Beneficial conversion feature - 10%
notes
|
—
|
1,586
|
—
|
1,586
|
|||||||||
Derivative
financial instrument - Series A Warrants
|
—
|
2,708
|
—
|
2,708
|
|||||||||
1,570
|
$
|
4,294
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
5,841
|
|||||||
Current
portion
|
(1,246
|
)
|
(1,811
|
)
|
|||||||||
$
|
324
|
$
|
4,030
|
We
accounted for the convertibility of the 10% Notes into common stock at a
conversion rate of $0.50 per share as a derivative liability subject to SFAS
No.
133. Management determined that the events or actions necessary to deliver
registered shares are not controlled by the Company and that the holders
have
the
right to demand that the Company pay the holders in cash, calculated as defined
in the Senior
Secured Convertible Promissory Note,
under
certain circumstances. Accordingly the Company accounted for the beneficial
conversion feature as a derivative liability. The estimated fair value of
the
derivative liability is based on the prepayment amount that would be owed
to a
10% Notes holder if payment is required. The prepayment amount is the greater
of
125% of the value of the 10% Notes and accrued interest or the value if the
10%
Notes and accrued interest are converted at $0.50 per share and then multiplied
by the then current stock price. Since the 10% Notes are convertible at the
issuance date an expense related to the derivative liability is recognized
on
that date. In the March 2006 financings $1,586,000 of the proceeds was
attributed to the estimated fair value of the derivative liability and an
expense of $1,586,000 was recognized.
We
accounted for the issuance of the Series A warrants to purchase 5,665,000
shares
of common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share as a derivative
liability subject to SFAS No. 133. Management determined that the events
or
actions necessary to deliver registered shares are not controlled by the
Company
and that the holders have
the
right to demand that the Company pay the holders in cash, calculated as defined
in the Series A warrant, under
certain circumstances. Accordingly the Company accounted for the Series A
warrants as a derivative liability. The estimated fair value of the derivative
liability is calculated using the Black-Scholes formula and such estimates
are
revalued at each balance sheet date with changes in value recorded as other
income or expense. In the March 2006 financings $2,708,000 of the proceeds
was
attributed to the estimated fair value of the derivative liability. The
$2,708,000 expense for the derivative liability will be treated as a discount
on
the 10% Notes and expensed, using the imputed interest method, over the 18
month
period to the 10% Notes’ maturity date.
If
the
Series B warrants were issued we would account for their issuance as a
derivative liability subject to SFAS No. 133 on that date based on the fair
value at the date of consummation of financings (see Note 9).
Note
6 - Interest Expense
The
components of interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2006
and
2005 are presented below (in thousands):
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Beneficial
conversion feature for 10% Notes
|
$
|
1,586
|
$
|
—
|
|||
Interest
expense for sales and use taxes and regulatory fees
|
52
|
—
|
|||||
$
|
1,638
|
$
|
—
|
11
Note
7 - Sale of VS Business
In
September 2003, we completed the sale of all of the assets of our VS business
to
Gores pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreement dated as of June
10,
2003. The total consideration payable to us under the agreement was up to
$24,000,000, consisting of $21,000,000 in cash, of which $19,000,000 was
payable
as of closing ($335,000 was placed in an escrow account) and $2,000,000 was
held
back by Gores to cover potential purchase price adjustments, an unsecured
$1,000,000 promissory note maturing on December 31, 2004 (bearing interest
at 5%
per annum) and up to $2,000,000 in earn-out payments based on performance
of the
assets over the two years following the closing. As partial consideration
for
the purchase of assets, Gores also assumed certain liabilities related to
the VS
business, including (1) all liabilities to be paid or performed after the
closing date that arose from or out of the performance or non-performance
by
Gores after the closing date of any contracts included in the assets or entered
into after June 10, 2003 and (2) our accounts payable, customer deposits,
deferred revenue and accrued liabilities related to the VS
business.
Pursuant
to the agreement, Gores agreed that, for a period of three years commencing
on
the closing date, it would not, directly or indirectly, acquire or own any
equity interest in certain of our competitors identified in the agreement.
The
agreement further provided that Gores could acquire an identified competitor
upon payment to us of a one-time fee of $5,000,000. In November 2004, Gores
acquired V-SPAN, Inc., which was one of the identified competitors.
Following
the closing of the sale to Gores, we were unable to reach agreement with
Gores
on the amount, if any, of the adjustment to be made to the purchase price,
which
was based on the net assets, as defined, of the VS business sold to Gores
as of
June 30, 2003. Consequently, we entered into arbitration with Gores in July
2004, with PriceWaterhouseCoopers as the arbitrator. In January 2005, the
arbitrator concluded that the net assets of the VS business sold to Gores
should
be reduced by $4,340,000.
In
March
2005, we entered into a settlement agreement with Gores, resolving the
outstanding disputes between the companies relating to the sale of the VS
business, various payables between the companies and Gores’ acquisition of
V-SPAN. Pursuant to the agreement, Gores paid us $2,750,000 and released
the
$335,000, including interest thereon that was escrowed at the closing of
the
asset sale. We dismissed our lawsuit against Gores relating to the V-SPAN
acquisition. We will not receive any payments under the earn-out provision
in
the agreement.
The
ultimate settlement of amounts due to/from Gores that arose subsequent to
the
transaction closing date and unrelated to the sale transaction, including
$100,000 of revenues that we recognized during the three months ended March
31,
2004 have been excluded from the sale transaction, and a gain from the
settlement of these items of $379,000 has been recognized during quarter
ended
March 31, 2005, when the settlement was reached with Gores.
The
arbitrator’s adjustment of $4,340,000 related to the correction of specific
financial reporting errors. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial
statements reflect these items prior to 2004 and the gain or loss on the
transaction has been accounted for upon the closing in 2003. Pursuant to
the
settlement agreement with Gores in 2005, each party was released from amounts
due to the other beyond the payment by Gores of $2,750,000 and the release
of
the escrowed cash to us. Accordingly, we recognized the gain on settlement
in
the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
Note
8 - March 2006 Restructuring
In
March
2006, we implemented a corporate restructuring plan designed to reduce certain
operating, sales and marketing and general and administrative costs. The
costs
of this restructuring, approximately $1,200,000, consisting of severance
payments, acceleration of vesting of stock options and benefit reimbursements,
were recorded in the first quarter of 2006 and will be paid through April
2007.
As part of the restructuring initiative, we implemented management changes,
including the departure of twenty-one employees and the promotion of Michael
Brandofino to Chief Operating Officer. David Trachtenberg, President and
Chief
Executive Officer since October 2003, and Gerard Dorsey, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer since December 2004 had left Glowpoint.
In
connection with their separation, Messrs. Trachtenberg and Dorsey were paid
severance based upon their employment agreements of approximately $500,000
and
$155,000, respectively, over the following year and receive other benefits
(e.g., accelerated vesting of restricted stock or options) valued at
approximately $180,000 and $7,000, respectively. The amount paid to them
is a
portion of the $1,200,000 of restructuring costs recorded in the first quarter
of 2006. In April 2006, Mr. Brandofino was appointed President and Chief
Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors, Edwin Heinen was
appointed Chief Financial Officer, and Joseph Laezza was appointed Chief
Operating Officer. The following is a summary of our March 2006 restructuring
activity as of March 31, 2006 (in thousands):
12
Accrual
as of December 31, 2005
|
$
|
0
|
||
Provision
for severance
|
1,200
|
|||
Less:
amounts paid
|
(104
|
)
|
||
Accrual
as of March 31, 2006
|
$
|
1,096
|
Note
9 - Subsequent Event
Management
has determined that the Series B warrants are not exercisable because we
achieved positive operating income, excluding the restructuring and non-cash
charges as identified on Schedule A of the Series B warrants, as amended.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Certain
statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or the Report, are
“forward-looking statements.” These forward-looking statements include, but are
not limited to, statements about the plans, objectives, expectations and
intentions of Glowpoint, Inc. (“Glowpoint”
or “we” or “us”).,
a
Delaware corporation and other statements contained in this Report that are
not
historical facts. Forward-looking statements in this Report or hereafter
included in other publicly available documents filed with the Securities
and
Exchange Commission, or the Commission, reports to our stockholders and other
publicly available statements issued or released by us involve known and
unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause our actual results,
performance (financial or operating) or achievements to differ from the future
results, performance (financial or operating) or achievements expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Such future results are based
upon
management's best estimates based upon current conditions and the most recent
results of operations. When used in this Report, the words “expect,”
“anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate” and similar
expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements,
because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties.
There
are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from
those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including
our
plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other factors that are
discussed under
the section entitled “Risk Factors,” in item 7of our
consolidated financial statements and the footnotes thereto for the fiscal
year
ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
as
an exhibit to Form 8-K on February 27, 2007.
The
following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this
Report.
Overview
Glowpoint,
Inc. ("Glowpoint" or "we" or "us"), a Delaware corporation, is a premiere
broadcast-quality, IP (Internet Protocol)-based managed video services provider.
We offer a vast array of managed video services, including video application
services, managed network services, IP and ISDN videoconferencing services,
multi-point conferencing (bridging), technology hosting and management, and
professional services. We provide these services to a wide variety of companies,
from large enterprises and governmental entities to small and medium-sized
businesses. Glowpoint is exclusively focused on high quality two-way video
communications and has been supporting millions of video calls since its
launch
in 2000. We have bundled some of our managed services to offer video
communication solutions for broadcast/media content acquisition and for video
call center applications. Recently, with the advent of HD (High Definition)
Telepresence solutions, we have combined various components of our features
and
services into a comprehensive “white glove” service offering that can support
any of the telepresence solutions on the market today.
Prior to
2004, Glowpoint, then known as Wire One Technologies, Inc., sold substantially
all of the assets of its video solutions (VS) business to an affiliate of
Gores
Technology Group (Gores). See Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements for further information.
13
On
March
7, 2005, we announced a settlement agreement with Gores, resolving the
outstanding disputes relating to the sale of the assets of our VS business
to
Gores in September 2003. The agreement also covered Gores' acquisition of
V-SPAN
Inc. in November 2004. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement,
Gores
paid us $2,750,000 and released to us the $335,000 that was escrowed at the
closing of the asset sale. Also as part of the settlement, we dismissed our
lawsuit against Gores relating to the V-SPAN acquisition.
On
March
14, 2005, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement with several
unrelated institutional investors in connection with the offering of (i)
an
aggregate of 6,766,667 shares of our common stock and (ii) warrants to purchase
up to an aggregate of 2,706,667 shares of our common stock. We received proceeds
from this offering of approximately $10,150,000, less our expenses relating
to
the offering, which were approximately $760,500, a portion of which represents
investment advisory fees totaling $710,500 to Burnham Hill Partners, our
financial advisor. The warrants are exercisable for a five-year period term
and
have an exercise price of $2.40 per share. As a result of subsequent financings,
the conversion price of these warrants has been adjusted to $1.82 as of March
31, 2006. The warrants may be exercised by cash payment of the exercise price
or
by "cashless exercise."
In
March
and April 2006, we issued senior secured convertible notes and warrants in
a
private placement offering to private investors. In the March and April 2006
transactions, we issued $5,665,000 and $515,000, respectively, with a total
aggregate principal amount of $6,180,000 of our 10% Senior Secured Convertible
Notes (“10% Notes”), Series A warrants to purchase 6,180,000 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share and Series B warrants to purchase
6,180,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share.
Both
warrants are subject to certain anti-dilution protection. The Series B warrants
only become exercisable after we make available to the public our financial
statements for the fourth quarter of 2006 if we fail to achieve positive
operating income, excluding restructuring and non-cash charges, in the fourth
quarter of 2006. In addition, the Series B warrants will be cancelled if
we
consummate a strategic transaction or repay the 10% Notes prior to the date
we
make our consolidated financial statements for the fourth quarter of 2006
available to the public. We also agreed to reduce the exercise price of
3,625,000 previously issued warrants held by the investors in this offering
to
$0.65 from a weighted average price of $3.38, and to extend the expiration
date
of any such warrants to no earlier than three years after the offering date.
The
new weighted average expiration date of the warrants will be 3.5 years from
a
previous weighted average expiration date of 2.9 years. In addition, we issued
to Burnham Hill Partners placement agent warrants to purchase 618,000 shares
of
our common stock at an exercise price of $0.55 per share. The warrants are
subject to certain anti-dilution protection. The $5,123,000 and $462,000
net
proceeds of the March and April 2006, respectively, financings are being
used to
support our corporate restructuring program and for working capital.
The
10%
Notes which bear interest at 10% per annum mature on September 30, 2007 and
are
convertible into common stock at a conversion rate of $0.50 per share. We
have
the option to pay the accrued interest for the 10% Notes in cash or additional
10% Notes.
Management
has determined that the Series B warrants are not exercisable because we
achieved positive operating income, excluding the restructuring and non-cash
charges as identified on Schedule A of the Series B warrants, as
amended.
Critical
Accounting Policies
There
have been no changes to our critical accounting policies in the three months
ended March 31, 2006. Critical accounting policies and the significant estimates
made in accordance with them are regularly discussed with our Audit Committee.
Those policies are discussed under “Critical Accounting Policies” in our
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” included in Item 7 of our consolidated financial statements and the
footnotes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to Form 8-K on February
27,
2007.
14
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth for the three months and three months ended March
31,
2006 and 2005, information derived from our condensed consolidated financial
statements as expressed as a percentage of revenues:
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenue
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
73.8
|
87.7
|
|||||
Gross
margin
|
26.2
|
12.3
|
|||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
Research
and development
|
5.7
|
7.4
|
|||||
Sales
and marketing
|
15.4
|
22.0
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
98.6
|
76.5
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
119.7
|
105.9
|
|||||
Loss
from operations
|
(93.5
|
)
|
(93.6
|
)
|
|||
Other
expense (income):
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
34.6
|
──
|
|||||
Interest
income
|
──
|
──
|
|||||
(Decrease)
increase in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
(0.5
|
)
|
0.9
|
||||
Gain
on settlement with Gores
|
──
|
(9.0
|
)
|
||||
Total
other expense (income), net
|
34.1
|
(8.1
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss
|
(127.6
|
)
|
(85.5
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(1.8
|
)
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock deemed dividends
|
──
|
(30.5
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
(129.4
|
)%
|
(118.1
|
)%
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2006 (the “2006 quarter”) Compared to Three Months Ended
March 31, 2005 (the “2005 quarter”).
Revenue
-
Revenue increased $519,000, or 12.4%, in the 2006 quarter to $4,721,000 from
$4,202,000 in the 2005 quarter. Subscription and related revenue increased
$545,000, or 20.7%, in the 2006 quarter to $3,176,000 from $2,631,000 in
the
2005 quarter. The increased subscription and related revenue is caused by
an 8%
increase in installed subscription circuits and an increase in the subscription
revenue per circuit. The increased subscription revenue per circuit is a
result
of the Company evaluating circuit profitability and upon circuit renewal
either
increasing the monthly subscription charges or canceling unprofitable circuits.
Non-subscription revenue consisting of bridging, events and other one-time
fees
decreased $26,000 in the 2006 quarter to $1,545,000 from $1,571,000 in the
2005
quarter.
Cost
of revenue
- Cost
of revenues for the 2006 quarter decreased $200,000, or 5.4%, to $3,486,000
from
$3,686,000 in the 2005 quarter. The decline in costs as a percentage of revenue
in the 2006 quarter is the result of the start of an on-going activity involving
the renegotiation of rates and the migration of service to lower cost providers
where possible. Savings were also generated in connection with our Points
of
Presences (“POP”). A POP is where our customers gain access to the Glowpoint
network. We eliminated three of our twelve POPs and excess capacity in several
other POPs.
Gross
margin
- Gross
margin for the 2006 quarter increased by $719,000, or 139.3%, to $1,235,000
from
$516,000 in the 2005 quarter. The savings discussed in Cost of Revenue section
caused our gross margin to increase to 26.2% in the 2006 quarter from 12.3%
in
the 2005 quarter. The rate of increase in our gross margin percentage is
not
indicative of results expected to be achieved in subsequent
quarters.
Research
and development
-
Research and development costs, which include the costs of the personnel
in this
group, the equipment they use and their use of the network for development
projects, decreased by $42,000, or 13.4%, in the 2006 quarter to $271,000
from
$313,000 in the 2005 quarter. The cost savings achieved were a direct result
of
the measures taken in the early part of 2006 which included staff reductions
and
reduced use of external contractors. As a percentage of revenue, it was 5.7%
for
the 2006 quarter, 7.4% for the 2005 quarter.
15
Sales
and marketing
- Sales
and marketing expenses, which include sales salaries, commissions, overhead
and
marketing costs, were reduced by $194,000, or 21.0%, in the 2006 quarter
to
$729,000 from $923,000 in the 2005 quarter. Reduced staff levels and marketing
programs as a result of the corporate restructuring that took place in March
2006 account for the lower costs. Sales and marketing expense, as a percentage
of revenue, was 15.4% for the 2006 quarter and 22.0% for the 2005 quarter.
General
and administrative
-
General and administrative expenses increased by $1,439,000, or 44.8%, in
the
2006 quarter to $4,655,000 from $3,214,000 in the 2005 period. The accrual
for
the March 2006 restructuring program in the amount of $1,200,000, designed
to
reduce certain operating, sales and marketing and general and administrative
costs, was the significant factor. As part of the restructuring initiative,
we
implemented management changes, including the departure of twenty-one employees.
In addition professional fees increased by $362,000 related to the restatement
of prior period financial statements and salaries, benefits and training
costs
also increased by $151,000. These increases were partially offset by reductions
in consulting expenses of $141,000, network and communication costs of $95,000,
travel and entertainment of $17,000 and bad debts of $60,000. General and
administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue were 98.6% in the 2006
quarter and 76.5% in the 2005 quarter.
Other
expense (income)
- Other
expense of $1,611,000 principally reflects interest expense of $1,638,000
which
is comprised of $1,586,000 for the expensing of the beneficial conversion
feature related to the 10% Notes and interest related to sales and use taxes
and
regulatory fees of $52,000 reduced by a $23,000 decrease in the fair value
of
derivative financial instruments related to the February 2004 capital raise
and
interest income of $4,000. Other income of $340,000 in the 2005 quarter
principally reflects a $379,000 gain on the settlement of an amount owed
to
Gores reduced by a $42,000 increase in the fair value of derivative financial
instruments related to the February 2004 capital raise.
Income
taxes - As
a
result of our losses we recorded no provision for incomes taxes in the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. Any deferred
tax asset that would be related to our losses has been fully reserved under
a
valuation allowance, reflecting the uncertainties as to realization evidenced
by
the Company’s historical results and restrictions on the usage of the net
operating loss carryforwards.
Net
loss -
Net
loss increased by $2,435,000, or 67.8%, to $6,029,000 in the 2006 quarter
from
$3,594,000 in the 2005 quarter.
Preferred
stock dividends -
We
recognized preferred stock dividends of $85,000 for the 2006 quarter and
$89,000
for the 2005 quarter.
Preferred
stock deemed dividends -
In the
2006 quarter there were no preferred stock deemed dividends. We recognized
preferred stock deemed dividends of $1,167,000 for the 2005 quarter in
connection with warrants and a reduced conversion price, which were offered
as
an inducement to convert our Series B convertible preferred stock. In addition,
we recognized preferred stock deemed dividends of $115,000 in the 2005 quarter
in connection with an anti-dilution adjustment to the conversion price of
our
Series B convertible preferred stock resulting from our March 2005 financing.
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
- Net
loss attributable to common stockholders increased by $1,149,000, or 23.1%
in
the 2006 quarter to $6,114,000, or $0.13 per basic and diluted share from
$4,965,000, or $0.13 per basic and diluted share, in the 2005 quarter.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we
will
continue as a going concern. We have incurred recurring operating losses
and
negative operating cash flows since our inception including a net loss
attributable to common stockholders of $6,114,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. At March 31, 2006, we had a working capital deficit of
$5,036,000. We had $870,000 in cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2006.
We
had net cash used in operations of $1,032,000 for the three months ended
March
31, 2006. Additionally, the 10% Notes mature in September 2007. These factors
raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.
In
March 2006 we implemented a corporate restructuring plan designed to reduce
certain operating, sales and marketing and general and administrative costs
(see
Note 8). We raised capital in March 2006, but continue to sustain losses
and
negative operating cash flows. Assuming we realize all of the savings from
our
restructured operating activities, assuming we are able to negotiate favorable
terms with the authorities regarding our sales and use taxes and regulatory
fees
and assuming we are able to renegotiate or refinance the 10% Notes (see Note
5),
we believe that our available capital as of March 31, 2006 will enable us
to
continue as a going concern through March 31, 2007. There are no assurances,
however, that we will be able to raise additional capital as needed, or upon
acceptable terms nor any assurances that we will be able renegotiate the
terms
and maturity date of the 10% Notes If we are unable to renegotiate the maturity
of the 10% Notes or issue new securities on favorable terms to repay them,
it
would have a material adverse effect on the Company.. The accompanying financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from this
uncertainty.
16
In
March
and April 2006, we issued senior secured convertible notes and warrants in
a
private placement offering to private investors. In the March and April 2006
transactions, we issued $5,665,000 and $515,000, respectively, with a total
aggregate principal amount of $6,180,000 of our 10% Senior Secured Convertible
Notes (“10% Notes”), Series A warrants to purchase 6,180,000 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share and Series B warrants to purchase
6,180,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share.
Both
warrants are subject to certain anti-dilution protection. The Series B warrants
only become exercisable after we make available to the public our financial
statements for the fourth quarter of 2006 if we fail to achieve positive
operating income, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, excluding restructuring and non-cash charges, in the fourth quarter
of 2006. In addition, the Series B warrants will be cancelled if we consummate
a
strategic transaction or repay the 10% Notes prior to the date we make our
consolidated financial statements for the fourth quarter of 2006 available
to
the public. Management has determined that the Series B warrants are not
exercisable because we achieved positive operating income, excluding the
restructuring and non-cash charges as identified on Schedule A of the Series
B
warrants, as amended. We also agreed to reduce the exercise price of 3,625,000
previously issued warrants held by the investors in this offering to $0.65
from
a weighted average price of $3.38, and to extend the expiration date of any
such
warrants to no earlier than three years after the offering date. The new
weighted average expiration date of the warrants will be 3.5 years from a
previous weighted average expiration date of 2.9 years. In addition, we issued
to Burnham Hill Partners placement agent warrants to purchase 618,000 shares
of
our common stock at an exercise price of $0.55 per share. The warrants are
subject to certain anti-dilution protection. The $5,123,000 and $462,000
net
proceeds of the March and April 2006, respectively, financings are being
used to
support our corporate restructuring program and for working capital.
The
10%
Notes which bear interest at 10% per annum mature on September 30, 2007 and
are
convertible into common stock at a conversion rate of $0.50 per share. We
have
the option to pay the accrued interest for the 10% Notes in cash or additional
10% Notes.
Management
has determined that the Series B warrants are not exercisable because we
achieved positive operating income, excluding the restructuring and non-cash
charges as identified on Schedule A of the Series B warrants, as
amended.
Net
cash
used in operating activities was $1,032,000 for the 2006 quarter. For the
2006
quarter, the primary components of the net cash usage were the net loss of
$6,029,000 which was increased by a decrease of $58,000 in deferred revenue
and
$23,000 for a decrease in the fair value of derivative financial instruments.
This usage was partially offset by an increase of $2,435,000 in accounts
payable
and accrued expenses , sales taxes and regulatory fees, expensing of $1,586,000
related to the beneficial conversion on the 10% Notes, depreciation and
amortization of $526,000, stock-based compensation of $297,000 and decreases
of
$143,000 in accounts receivable and $85,000 in prepaid expenses and other
current assets.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2006, there were no material changes in our
contractual obligations.
Cash
used
in investing activities in the 2006 quarter for the purchase of property,
equipment and leasehold improvements was $121,000. The Glowpoint network
is
currently built out to handle the anticipated level of subscriptions through
2006. We do not anticipate current expansion for the network and therefore
currently have no commitments to make significant capital expenditures in
2006.
Cash
provided by financing activities for the 2006 quarter was $0 because the
proceeds related to the 10% Notes were not received until April 2006.
17
Commitments
and Contingencies
During
the three months ended March 31, 2006, there were no other items except as
shown
below that significantly impacted our commitments and contingencies as discussed
in our consolidated
financial statements and the footnotes thereto for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
an
exhibit to Form 8-K on February 27, 2007. The following table summarizes
our
contractual cash obligations and commercial commitments at March 31, 2006,
and
the effect such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flow
in
future periods (in thousands).
Contractual
Obligations:
|
Total
|
Less
Than 1 Year
|
1-3
Years
|
3-5
Years
|
More
than 5 Years
|
|||||||||||
Long
term debt - 10% Notes
|
$
|
5,665
|
$
|
─
|
$
|
5,665
|
$
|
─
|
$
|
─
|
||||||
Derivative
liabilities
|
5,841
|
4,030
|
1,811
|
─
|
─
|
|||||||||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
570
|
357
|
210
|
3
|
─
|
|||||||||||
Commercial
commitments
|
11,279
|
5,200
|
5,399
|
680
|
─
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
23,355
|
$
|
9,587
|
$
|
13,085
|
$
|
683
|
$
|
─
|
Inflation
Management
does not believe inflation had a material adverse effect on the financial
statements for the periods presented.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
We
have
exposure to interest rate risk related to our cash equivalents portfolio.
The
primary objective of our investment policy is to preserve principal while
maximizing yields. Our cash equivalents portfolio is short-term in nature;
therefore changes in interest rates will not materially impact our consolidated
financial condition. However, such interest rate changes can cause fluctuations
in our results of operations and cash flows. We have certain derivative
financial instruments related to the 10% Notes and the February 2004 capital
raise. As the financial instruments are revalued each period these will cause
fluctuations in our results from operations and if the 10% Notes are not
converted and we are unable to register our common stock, ultimately cash
flow
from their settlement.
There
are
no other material qualitative or quantitative market risks particular to
us.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
During
a
portion of the 2005 periods covered by this report we lacked adequate internal
controls. A material weakness in internal controls is a significant deficiency,
or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a
remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will be not be prevented or detected. We believe that a material
weakness in our internal controls arose as the result of aggregating several
significant deficiencies, including: inadequate review and approval of journal
entries in the financial statement preparation process and a lack of supporting
documentation and assumptions used therein, an insufficient number of technical
accounting and public company reporting personnel in the finance department,
an
externally maintained warrant registry, the absence of a formal monthly closing
process and subsequent formal reporting of monthly financial statements and
account variance analysis. Additionally, our finance office was located in
New
Hampshire and our headquarters was located in New Jersey.
Our
current management team has instituted improved internal accounting controls,
including the institution of a formal monthly closing process, including
account
analysis, oversight of all closing processes, formal monthly review of the
financial statements and the implementation of monthly written reports to
the
Board of Directors and an internally maintained warrant registry. We are
continuing to evaluate and improve our internal control procedures, where
applicable.
Another
material weakness is that the Company does not release timely financial
information to the general public. The restatements of prior periods delayed
the
filing of current periods and Management is in the process of hiring additional
staff to assist in completing the prior financial statements to allow the
Company to focus on, and issue, current financial statements.
18
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
We
are
not currently defending any suit or claim.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
The
risk
factors set forth in Item 1A of our 2006 Form 10-K, which is being filed
simultaneously with this form 10-Q, are incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There
have been no sales of securities in the past three years that have not been
previously reported in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report
on
Form 8-K.
Item
3. Defaults
upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item
5. Other
Information
None.
Item
6. Exhibits
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer
|
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
32.1
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32.2
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
19
(i) Signatures
In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
GLOWPOINT,
INC.
Registrant
|
||
|
|
|
Date:
June 6, 2007
|
By: | /s/ Michael Brandofino |
Michael
Brandofino, Chief Executive Officer
(principal
executive officer)
|
Date:
June 6, 2007
|
By: | /s/ Edwin F. Heinen |
Edwin
F. Heinen, Chief Financial Officer
(principal
financial and accounting
officer)
|
20