Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2008 July (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended July 31, 2008
Or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period
From ___________ to ___________
Commission file number: 001-33417
OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 22-2535818 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
Incorporation or Organization) | Identification No.) |
1590 REED ROAD, PENNINGTON, NJ 08534
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)
(609) 730-0400
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 29, 2008, the number of outstanding shares of common stock of the registrant was
10,210,354.
OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2008
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2008
Page | ||||||||
Number | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION |
||||||||
EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION |
||||||||
EX-32.1: CERTIFICATION |
||||||||
EX-32.2: CERTIFICATION |
||||||||
EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION | ||||||||
EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION | ||||||||
EX-32.2: CERTIFICATION | ||||||||
EX-32.2: CERTIFICATION |
PowerBuoy® is a registered trademark of Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and the Ocean Power
Technologies logo is a trademark of Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. All other trademarks appearing
in this report are the property of their respective holders.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
We have made statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements convey our current expectations or forecasts of future events.
Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our future financial position, business
strategy, budgets, projected costs, plans and objectives of management for future operations. The
words may, continue, estimate, intend, plan, will, believe, project, expect,
anticipate and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of
these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking.
Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this report may turn out to be inaccurate. We
have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections
about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition,
results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. They may be affected by inaccurate
assumptions we might make or unknown risks and uncertainties, including the risks, uncertainties
and assumptions described in Item 1A Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended April 30, 2008 and elsewhere in this report. In light of these risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report may not occur as
contemplated and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied by the
forward-looking statements.
You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date of this filing. Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements to reflect new information or future events or otherwise.
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
April 30, 2008 | July 31, 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 88,836,304 | 73,644,649 | |||||
Short-term investments |
| 22,814,188 | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
1,728,637 | 495,597 | ||||||
Unbilled receivables |
577,452 | 1,402,162 | ||||||
Other current assets |
1,375,249 | 1,835,115 | ||||||
Total current assets |
92,517,642 | 100,191,711 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
628,454 | 842,323 | ||||||
Patents, net of accumulated amortization of
$204,585 and $213,459, respectively |
717,288 | 755,055 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
1,123,848 | 1,121,976 | ||||||
Long-term investments |
12,233,437 | | ||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
330,296 | 329,927 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 107,550,965 | 103,240,992 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 1,457,575 | 1,961,196 | |||||
Accrued expenses |
4,490,008 | 3,352,823 | ||||||
Unearned revenues |
699,752 | 511,828 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
6,647,335 | 5,825,847 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
188,784 | 126,491 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
16,237 | 17,590 | ||||||
Deferred credits |
600,000 | 600,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
7,452,356 | 6,569,928 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (note 11) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; authorized
5,000,000 shares, none issued or outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized
105,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding
10,210,354 shares |
10,210 | 10,210 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
153,057,265 | 153,517,711 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(52,927,641 | ) | (56,820,805 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(41,225 | ) | (36,052 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
100,098,609 | 96,671,064 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 107,550,965 | 103,240,992 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
3
Table of Contents
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2008 | |||||||
Revenues |
$ | 555,704 | 1,786,628 | |||||
Cost of revenues |
804,992 | 1,948,146 | ||||||
Gross loss |
(249,288 | ) | (161,518 | ) | ||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Product development costs |
1,815,734 | 1,702,949 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative costs |
1,996,602 | 2,551,816 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
3,812,336 | 4,254,765 | ||||||
Operating loss |
(4,061,624 | ) | (4,416,283 | ) | ||||
Interest income |
1,444,286 | 547,592 | ||||||
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
179,494 | (24,473 | ) | |||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,437,844 | ) | (3,893,164 | ) | |||
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
$ | (0.24 | ) | (0.38 | ) | |||
Weighted average shares used to compute
basic and diluted net loss per share |
10,189,354 | 10,210,354 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
4
Table of Contents
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended July 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2008 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,437,844 | ) | (3,893,164 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss |
(179,494 | ) | 24,473 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
63,909 | 69,475 | ||||||
Treasury note premium amortization |
| 48,632 | ||||||
Compensation expense related to stock option grants |
752,552 | 460,446 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
1,353 | 1,353 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
788,136 | 1,228,508 | ||||||
Unbilled receivables |
(276,397 | ) | (822,876 | ) | ||||
Other current assets |
(715,277 | ) | (459,808 | ) | ||||
Other noncurrent assets |
| (22,398 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
(382,287 | ) | 483,097 | |||||
Accrued expenses |
(1,109,675 | ) | (1,132,801 | ) | ||||
Unearned revenues |
240,954 | (187,924 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(3,254,070 | ) | (4,202,987 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of certificates of deposit |
(9,030,855 | ) | (10,629,383 | ) | ||||
Maturities of certificates of deposit |
7,681,679 | | ||||||
Purchases of equipment |
(9,632 | ) | (234,705 | ) | ||||
Payments of patent costs |
(16,938 | ) | (61,363 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,375,746 | ) | (10,925,451 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Common stock issuance costs |
(870,116 | ) | | |||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
| (42,801 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
35,971 | | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(834,145 | ) | (42,801 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
185,923 | (20,416 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(5,278,038 | ) | (15,191,655 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
107,505,473 | 88,836,304 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 102,227,435 | 73,644,649 | |||||
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Capitalized patent costs financed through accounts payable |
$ | | 20,326 | |||||
Capitalized equipment costs financed through accounts payable |
$ | 45,566 | 76,628 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
5
Table of Contents
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(1) Background and Basis of Presentation
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated on April 19, 1984 in New Jersey,
commenced active operations in 1994 and re-incorporated in Delaware in April 2007. The Company
develops and is commercializing proprietary systems that generate electricity by harnessing the
renewable energy of ocean waves. The Company markets and sells its products in the United States
and internationally.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The interim operating
results are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year or for any other interim
period. Further information on potential factors that could affect the Companys financial results
can be found in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2008 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
In addition, the Company evaluates its relationships with other entities to identify whether
they are variable interest entities as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46R), and to assess
whether it is the primary beneficiary of such entities. If the determination is made that the
Company is the primary beneficiary, then that entity is included in the consolidated financial
statements in accordance with FIN 46R.
(b) Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management of the Company to
make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period.
Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the recoverability of the
carrying amount of property and equipment and patents; valuation allowances for receivables and
deferred income tax assets; and percentage of completion of customer contracts for purposes of
revenue recognition. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(c) Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue on government and commercial contracts under the
percentage-of-completion method. The percentage of completion is determined by relating the costs
incurred to date to the estimated total costs. The cumulative effects resulting from revisions of
estimated total contract costs and revenues are recorded in the period in which the facts requiring
revision become known. Upon anticipating a loss on a contract, the Company recognizes the full
amount of the anticipated loss in the current period. During the three months ended July 31, 2008,
the Company recorded an additional provision of $231,000 related to anticipated losses on
contracts. Reserves related to loss contracts in the amounts of approximately $2,070,000 and
$1,331,000 are included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of
April 30, 2008 and July 31, 2008, respectively.
Unbilled receivables represent expenditures on contracts, plus applicable profit margin, not
yet billed. Unbilled receivables are normally billed and collected within one year. Billings made
on contracts are recorded as a reduction of unbilled receivables, and to the extent that such
billings exceed costs incurred plus applicable profit margin, they are recorded as unearned
revenues.
6
Table of Contents
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(d) Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of investments in short-term financial instruments with maturities of
three months or less from the date of purchase. Cash and cash equivalents include $15,617,000 and
$3,053,000 of certificates of deposit with an initial term of less than three months at April 30,
2008 and July 31, 2008, respectively, and $1,251,000 and $6,907,000 invested in a money market fund
as of April 30, 2008 and July 31, 2008, respectively. In addition, $70,881,000 and $62,635,000 was
invested in short-term Treasury bills as of April 30, 2008 and July 31, 2008, respectively.
(e) Restricted Cash and Credit Facility
As of July 31, 2008, the Company had $1,121,976 in cash restricted under the terms of a
security agreement between Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Barclays Bank. Under this agreement,
the cash is on deposit at Barclays Bank and serves as security for letters of credit which are
expected to be issued by Barclays Bank on behalf of Ocean Power Technologies Ltd., the Companys UK
subsidiary, under a 800,000 credit facility established by Barclays Bank for such subsidiary. The
credit facility is for the issuance of letters of credit and bank guarantees, and carries a fee of
1% per annum of the amount of any such obligations issued by Barclays Bank. The credit facility
does not have an expiration date, and is cancelable at the discretion of the bank.
(f) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation and amortization is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives (three to seven years) of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining
lease term. Expenses for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.
Depreciation expense was $58,960 and $60,602 for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2008,
respectively.
(g) Foreign Exchange Gains and Losses
The Company has invested in certain certificates of deposit and has maintained cash accounts
that are denominated in British pound sterling, Euros and Australian dollars. Such certificates of
deposit and cash accounts had a balance of approximately $9,646,000 and $7,852,000 as of April 30,
2008 and July 31, 2008, respectively. Such positions may result in realized and unrealized foreign
exchange gains or losses from exchange rate fluctuations, which are included in foreign exchange
gain (loss) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
(h) Patents
External costs related to the filing of patents, including legal and filing fees, are
capitalized. Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method over the life of the patents
(17 years). Expenses for the development of technology are charged to operations as incurred.
Amortization expense was $4,949 and $8,875 for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2008,
respectively. Amortization expense for the next five fiscal years related to amounts capitalized
for patents as of July 31, 2008 is estimated to be approximately $40,000 per year.
(i) Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets, such as property and equipment
and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of the asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be
generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated future cash
flows, then an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented
in the consolidated balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value
less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposal group
classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability
sections of the consolidated balance sheet. The Company reviewed its long-lived assets for
indicators of impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and determined that no impairment review
of its long-lived assets was necessary for the three months ended July 31, 2008.
7
Table of Contents
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(j) Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk
consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, bank certificates of deposit and trade
receivables. The Company invests its excess cash in highly liquid investments (principally
short-term bank deposits, money market funds, commercial paper and treasury bills) and does not
believe that it is exposed to any significant risks related to such investments.
The table below shows the percentage of the Companys revenues derived from customers whose
revenues accounted for at least 10% of the Companys consolidated revenues for the periods
indicated:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
July 31, | ||||||||
Customer | 2007 | 2008 | ||||||
US Navy |
45 | % | 41 | % | ||||
Iberdrola and Total |
24 | % | 50 | % | ||||
Scottish Executive |
31 | % | 8 | % |
The loss of, or a significant reduction in revenues from, any of these customers could
significantly impact the Companys financial position or results of operations. The Company does
not require collateral from its customers.
(k) Net Loss per Common Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share for all periods presented is computed by dividing net
loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Due to
the Companys net losses, potentially dilutive securities, consisting of outstanding stock options,
were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect.
In computing diluted net loss per share, options to purchase 1,525,071 shares of common stock
for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 1,667,663 shares of common stock for the three months
ended July 31, 2008 were excluded from the computations.
(l) Stock-Based Compensation
On May 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which requires that the costs resulting from all share-based payment
transactions be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at their fair values. The
Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective application method under which the
provisions of SFAS No. 123R apply to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or canceled
after the adoption date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of the awards for which
the requisite service had not been rendered that were outstanding as of May 1, 2006 will be
recognized in the consolidated statements of operations over the remaining service period after
such date based on the awards original estimated fair value. The aggregate share-based
compensation expense recorded in the consolidated statements of operations under SFAS No. 123R was
approximately $753,000 and $460,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2008,
respectively.
8
Table of Contents
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Valuation Assumptions for Options Granted During the Three Months Ended July 31, 2007 and 2008
The fair value of each stock option granted during the three months ended July 31, 2007 and
2008 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, assuming no
dividends and using the weighted average valuation assumptions noted in the following table. The
risk-free rate is based on the US Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected
life (estimated period of time outstanding) of the stock options granted was estimated using the
simplified method as permitted by the SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based
Payment. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a peer group of companies for a
period equal to the stock options expected life, calculated on a daily basis.
2007 | 2008 | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
5.1 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||
Expected dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
Expected life |
6.1 years | 6.3 years | ||||||
Expected volatility |
77.8 | % | 79.4 | % |
The above assumptions were used to determine the weighted average per share fair value of $11.48
and $6.81 for stock options granted during the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2008,
respectively.
(m) Accounting for Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are expected to be recovered,
settled or utilized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
(n) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The functional currency for the Companys foreign operations is the applicable local currency.
The translation from the applicable foreign currencies to US dollars is performed for balance sheet
accounts using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense
accounts using an average exchange rate during the period. The unrealized gains or losses resulting
from such translation are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders
equity.
(o) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which establishes a
framework for reporting fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No.
157 as issued is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. On February 12,
2008, FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of
FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP SFAS 157-2)
was issued, which delays the effective date to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for
certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 on May 1, 2008,
except for the items covered by FSP SFAS 157-2.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used
in measuring fair value as follows:
| Level 1: Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; | ||
| Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and | ||
| Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. |
9
Table of Contents
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 allows companies to elect to measure certain assets and
liabilities at fair value and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations (SFAS No.
141R), which establishes the principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes the assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquirer at the
acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions. This
statement applies to business combinations for which the acquisition date is after the beginning of
the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is not
permitted. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 141R upon its effective
date as appropriate for any future business combinations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements. SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies
that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity
that should be recorded as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. This
statement also requires that consolidated net income shall be adjusted to include the net income
attributed to the noncontrolling interest. Disclosure on the face of the statement of operations of
the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling
interest is required. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
Earlier adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 160.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, which enhances the disclosure
requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide
enhanced disclosures about (a) the location and amounts of derivative instruments in an entitys
financial statements, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for
under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The guidance in SFAS No. 161 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15,
2008, with early application encouraged. This statement encourages, but does not require,
comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 161.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental
entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. This statement is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of SFAS No. 162.
(3) Accrued Expenses
Included in accrued expenses at April 30, 2008 and July 31, 2008 were contract loss reserves
of approximately $2,070,000 and $1,331,000, respectively, and accrued employee incentive payments
of approximately $572,000 and $41,000, respectively. Accrued expenses at April 30, 2008 and July
31, 2008 also included legal and accounting fees of approximately $556,000 and $283,000,
respectively, and accrued employee vacation of $143,000 and $167,000, respectively.
10
Table of Contents
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(4) Related-Party Transactions
In August 1999, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an individual for
marketing services, which currently provides for a rate of $800 per day of services provided. The
individual became a member of the board of directors in June 2006. Under this consulting agreement,
the Company expensed approximately $16,000 and $10,000 during the three months ended July 31, 2007
and 2008, respectively.
Also see note 7 for an additional related-party transaction.
(5) Debt
During the year ended April 30, 2000, the Company received an award of $250,000 from the State
of New Jersey Commission on Science and Technology for the development of a wave power system that
was deployed off the coast of New Jersey. Under the terms of this award, the Company must repay the
amount funded, without interest, by July 15, 2012. The amounts to be repaid each year are
determined as a percentage of revenues (as defined in the loan agreement) the Company receives that
year from its customer contracts that meet criteria specified in the loan agreement, with any
remaining amount due on July 15, 2012. Based upon the terms of the award, the Company has repaid
approximately $61,000 and was required to repay an additional approximately $63,000 as of July 31,
2008. The total repayment amount of approximately $124,000 has reduced the Companys long-term debt
balance. The current payment required was included in accrued expenses in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of July 31, 2008.
(6) Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes (FIN 48), on May 1, 2007. During the three months ended July 31, 2008, the Company
had no changes in uncertain tax positions. At July 31, 2008, the Company did not have any
unrecognized tax benefits as a result of uncertain tax positions. The Company has net operating
loss carryforwards that originated in years dating back to the tax year ended April 30, 1994. The
tax years April 30, 1994 through April 30, 2008 remain open to examination by the major taxing
jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.
(7) Deferred Credits
During the year ended April 30, 2001, in connection with the sale of common stock to an
investor, the Company received $600,000 from the investor in exchange for an option to purchase up
to 500,000 metric tons of carbon emissions credits generated by the Company during the years 2008
through 2012, at a 30% discount from the then-prevailing market rate. This amount has been recorded
as a deferred credit in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of April 30, 2008 and July
31, 2008. If, by December 31, 2012, the Company does not become entitled under applicable laws to
the full amount of emission credits covered by the option, the Company is obligated to return the
option fee of $600,000, less the aggregate discount on any emission credits sold to the investor
prior to such date. If the Company receives emission credits under applicable laws and fails to
sell to the investor the credits up to the full amount of emission credits covered by the option,
the investor is entitled to liquidated damages equal to 30% of the aggregate market value of the
shortfall in emission credits (subject to a limit on the market price of emission credits). The
Company has not received or sold any emission credits as of July 31, 2008.
(8) Common Stock
On April 30, 2007, the Company completed an initial public offering in the United States on
The NASDAQ Global Market by issuing 5,000,000 shares of its common stock for a purchase price of
$20.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $89,900,000.
(9) Preferred Stock
In September 2003, the Companys stockholders authorized 5,000,000 shares of undesignated
preferred stock with a par value of $0.001 per share. At April 30, 2008 and July 31, 2008, no
shares of preferred stock had been issued.
(10) Stock Options
Prior to August 2001, the Company maintained qualified and nonqualified stock option plans.
The Company had reserved 490,307 shares of common stock for issuance under these plans. There are
no options available for future grant under these plans as of July 31, 2008.
11
Table of Contents
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
In August 2001, the Company approved the 2001 Stock Plan, which provides for the grant of
incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options. A total of 1,000,000 shares were authorized
for issuance under the 2001 Stock Plan. As of July 31, 2008, the Company had issued or reserved
658,327 shares for issuance under the 2001 Stock Plan. After the effectiveness of the 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan, no further options or other awards have been or will be granted under the 2001
Stock Plan.
On April 24, 2007, the Companys 2006 Stock Incentive Plan became effective. A total of
803,215 shares are authorized for issuance under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. As of July 31,
2008, the Company had issued options for 541,546 shares of common stock and had reserved an
additional 261,669 shares of common stock available for future issuance under the 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan. The Companys employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors are eligible
to receive awards under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan; however, incentive stock options may only be
granted to employees. The maximum number of shares of common stock with respect to which awards may
be granted to any participant under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan is 200,000 per calendar year.
Members of the board of directors who are not full-time employees receive, as part of their annual
compensation, a choice of either (a) an option to purchase 2,000 shares of common stock that is
fully vested at the time of grant, or (b) shares of common stock worth $10,000, which vests 50% at
the time of grant and 50% one year later. Vesting provisions of stock options are determined by the
board of directors. The contractual term of these stock options is up to ten years. The 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan is administered by the Companys board of directors who may delegate authority to
one or more committees or subcommittees of the board of directors or to the Companys officers. If
the board of directors delegates authority to an officer, the officer has the power to make awards
to all of the Companys employees, except to executive officers. The board of directors will fix
the terms of the awards to be granted by such officer. No award may be granted under the 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan after December 7, 2016, but the vesting and effectiveness of awards granted before
that date may extend beyond that date.
Transactions under these option plans during the three months ended July 31, 2008 are as
follows:
Weighted | ||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | |||||||||||
Shares Under | Average | Contractual | ||||||||||
Option | Exercise Price | Term | ||||||||||
(In Years) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding April 30, 2008 |
1,445,302 | $ | 14.61 | |||||||||
Forfeited |
(500 | ) | 14.02 | |||||||||
Expired |
(20,560 | ) | 16.75 | |||||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||||||
Granted |
243,421 | 9.52 | ||||||||||
Outstanding July 31, 2008 |
1,667,663 | 13.84 | 5.7 | |||||||||
Exercisable July 31, 2008 |
1,117,396 | 14.57 | 4.2 | |||||||||
The total intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable options as of July 31, 2008 was
approximately $482,000. As of July 31, 2008, approximately 487,000 additional options were expected
to vest, which had zero intrinsic value and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 8.8
years. As of July 31, 2008, there was approximately $4,081,000 of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the plans. This cost is expected to be
recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 3.3 years. The Company normally issues new
shares of common stock to satisfy option exercises under these plans.
(11) Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Company is involved from time to time in certain legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. Management believes that the outcome of such actions will not have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
12
Table of Contents
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(12) Operating Segments and Geographic Information
The Companys business consists of one segment as this represents managements view of the
Companys operations. The Company operates on a worldwide basis with one operating company in the
US, one operating subsidiary in the UK and one operating subsidiary in Australia, which are
categorized below as North America, Europe and Australia, respectively. Revenues are generally
attributed to the operating unit that bills the customers.
Geographic information is as follows:
Three Months Ended July 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
North America | Europe | Australia | Total | |||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 246,702 | 309,002 | | 555,704 | |||||||||||
Operating loss |
(3,166,591 | ) | (822,493 | ) | (72,540 | ) | (4,061,624 | ) | ||||||||
Long-lived assets |
261,638 | 122,045 | 1,655 | 385,338 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
114,387,842 | 1,583,413 | 34,307 | 116,005,562 |
Three Months Ended July 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
North America | Europe | Australia | Total | |||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 748,299 | 1,038,329 | | 1,786,628 | |||||||||||
Operating loss |
(3,652,555 | ) | (682,658 | ) | (81,070 | ) | (4,416,283 | ) | ||||||||
Long-lived assets |
504,906 | 336,656 | 761 | 842,323 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
99,497,929 | 3,569,041 | 174,022 | 103,240,992 |
13
Table of Contents
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q. References to a fiscal year in this Form 10-Q refer to the year ended April 30 of that
year (e.g., fiscal 2009 refers to the year ending April 30, 2009).
Overview
We develop and are commercializing proprietary systems that generate electricity by harnessing
the renewable energy of ocean waves. Our PowerBuoy systems use proprietary technologies to convert
the mechanical energy created by the rising and falling of ocean waves into electricity. We
currently offer two PowerBuoy products, which consist of our utility PowerBuoy system and our
autonomous PowerBuoy system.
We market our utility PowerBuoy system, which is designed to supply electricity to a local or
regional power grid, to utilities and other electrical power producers seeking to add electricity
generated by wave energy to their existing electricity supply. We market our autonomous PowerBuoy
system, which is designed to generate power for use independent of the power grid, to customers
that require electricity in remote locations. We believe there are a variety of potential
applications for our autonomous PowerBuoy system, including sonar and radar surveillance, tsunami
warning, oceanographic data collection, offshore platforms and offshore aquaculture. We also offer
our customers operations and maintenance services for our PowerBuoy systems, which are expected to
provide a source of recurring revenues.
We were incorporated in New Jersey in April 1984, began commercial operations in 1994, and
were re-incorporated in Delaware in 2007. We currently have six wholly-owned subsidiaries, which
include Ocean Power Technologies Ltd., Reedsport OPT Wave Park LLC, Oregon Wave Energy Partners I,
LLC, Oregon Wave Energy Partners II, LLC, California Wave Energy Partners I, LLC and Fairhaven OPT
OceanPower LLC, and we own approximately 88% of the ordinary shares of Ocean Power Technologies
(Australasia) Pty Ltd. Our revenues have been generated from research contracts and development and
construction contracts relating to our wave energy technology. The development of our technology
has been funded by capital we raised and by development engineering contracts we received starting
in fiscal 1995. In fiscal 1996, we received the first of several research contracts with the US
Navy to study the feasibility of wave energy. As a result of those research contracts, we entered
into our first development and construction contract with the US Navy in fiscal 2002 under a still
on-going project for the development and testing of our wave power systems at the US Marine Corps
Base in Oahu, Hawaii. We generated our first revenue relating to our autonomous PowerBuoy system
from contracts with Lockheed Martin Corporation in fiscal 2003, and we entered into our first
development and construction contract with Lockheed Martin in fiscal 2004 for the development and
construction of a prototype demonstration autonomous PowerBuoy system. In fiscal 2005, we entered
into a development agreement with an affiliate of Iberdrola S.A., a large electric utility company
located in Spain and one of the largest renewable energy producers in the world, and other parties
to jointly study the possibility of developing a wave power station off the coast of northern
Spain. An affiliate of Total S.A., which is one of the worlds largest oil and gas companies, also
entered into the development agreement in June 2005. In January 2006, we completed the assessment
phase of the project, and in July 2006 we entered into an agreement with Iberdrola Energias Marinas
de Cantabria, S.A. to complete the first phase of the construction of a 1.39 megawatt (MW) wave
power station. In addition, we have entered into a contract with affiliates of Iberdrola and Total
to assess the viability of a 2 to 5MW power station off the coast of France. In 2007, we received a
$1.8 million contract from the Scottish Executive for the construction of a 150 kilowatt (kW)
PowerBuoy demonstration system at Orkney, Scotland. In June 2007, we received a $1.7 million
contract from the US Navy to provide our PowerBuoy technology to a unique program for data
gathering in the ocean. Under this 18-month program, the US Navy will conduct an ocean test of our
autonomous PowerBuoy as the power source for the Navys Deep Water Acoustic Detection System. In
August 2007, we announced the award of a $0.5 million contract from PNGC Power, an Oregon-based
electric power cooperative, providing funding toward the fabrication and installation of a 150kW
PowerBuoy system off the coast of Oregon. As of July 31, 2008, our backlog was $3.7 million, a
decrease of $1.8 million from April 30, 2008.
For the three months ended July 31, 2008, we generated revenues of $1.8 million and incurred a
net loss of $3.9 million, compared to revenues of $0.6 million and a net loss of $2.4 million for
the three months ended July 31, 2007. As of July 31, 2008, our accumulated deficit was $56.8
million. We have not been profitable since inception, and we do not know whether or when we will
become profitable because of the significant uncertainties with respect to our ability to
successfully commercialize our PowerBuoy systems in the emerging renewable energy market. Since
fiscal 2002, the US Navy has accounted for a significant portion of our revenues. We expect that
over time, revenues derived from utilities and other non-government commercial customers will
increase more rapidly than revenues from government customers and will, within a few years,
represent the majority of our revenues.
14
Table of Contents
Financial Operations Overview
The following describes certain line items in our consolidated statement of operations and
some of the factors that affect our operating results.
Revenues
We have historically generated revenues primarily from the development and construction of our
PowerBuoy systems for demonstration purposes and, to a lesser extent, from customer-sponsored
research and development. For the three months ended July 31, 2008 and 2007, we derived
approximately 91% and 69%, respectively, of our revenues from government and commercial development
and construction contracts and 9% and 31%, respectively, of our revenues from customer-sponsored
research and development. Generally, we recognize revenue under the percentage-of-completion method
based on the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated costs at completion. In certain
circumstances, revenue under contracts that have specified milestones or other performance criteria
may be recognized only when our customer acknowledges that such criteria have been satisfied. In
addition, recognition of revenue (and the related costs) may be deferred for fixed-price contracts
until contract completion if we are unable to reasonably estimate the total costs of the project
prior to completion. Because we have a small number of contracts, revisions to the percentage of
completion determination or delays in meeting performance criteria or in completing projects may
have a significant effect on our revenue for the periods involved.
Under our agreement for the current phase of construction of a wave power station off the
coast of Santoña, Spain, our revenues are limited to reimbursement for our construction costs
without any mark-up and we are required to bear a portion of any cost overruns and to absorb
certain other costs as set forth in the agreement. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we
made the decision to absorb additional costs related to the current phase of the project beyond our
obligation for the initial cost overruns and certain other costs as set forth in the agreement.
This decision was based primarily on the progress of the project to date, the benefits to be
derived from a successful initial project and the prospect of incremental contract value to be
received in connection with additional work under this contract.
Our revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2008 increased compared to the revenues for
the three months ended July 31, 2007. The revenue increase reflected a higher level of activity in
connection with our Spain construction contract, our entry into a new contract with the US Navy in
June 2007 to provide our PowerBuoy technology to a unique program for data gathering in the ocean
and a higher level of activity on our contract for the construction, installation and in-ocean
demonstration of our latest 150kW PowerBuoy that will be installed at the European Marine Energy
Centre (EMEC) at Orkney, Scotland.
Iberdrola and Total accounted for approximately 50% of our revenues for the three months ended
July 31, 2008, and approximately 24% of our revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2007. The
US Navy accounted for approximately 41% of our revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2008,
and approximately 45% of our revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2007. Since fiscal 2002,
the US Navy has accounted for a significant portion of our revenues. We expect that over time,
revenues derived from utilities and other non-government commercial customers will increase more
rapidly than revenues from government customers and will, within a few years, represent the
majority of our revenues.
We currently focus our sales and marketing efforts on coastal North America, the west coast of
Europe, the coasts of Australia and the east coast of Japan. During the three months ended July 31,
2008 and 2007, we derived 58% and 56%, respectively, of our revenues from outside the United
States.
Cost of revenues
Our cost of revenues consists primarily of material, labor and manufacturing overhead
expenses, such as engineering expense, equipment depreciation and maintenance and facility related
expenses, and includes the cost of PowerBuoy parts and services supplied by third-party suppliers.
Cost of revenues also includes PowerBuoy system delivery and deployment expenses and an anticipated
loss at completion on our contract for a wave power station off the coast of Spain.
We operated at a gross loss of $0.2 million in both the three months ended July 31, 2008 and
2007. Our ability to operate at a gross profit will depend on the nature of future contracts and on
our success at increasing sales of our PowerBuoy systems and our ability to manage costs incurred
on fixed price commercial contracts.
Product development costs
Our product development costs consist of salaries and other personnel-related costs and the
costs of products, materials and outside services used in our product development and unfunded
research activities. Our product development costs primarily relate to our efforts to increase the
output of our utility PowerBuoy system, including the 150kW PowerBuoy system and, to a lesser
extent, to our research and development of new products, product applications and complementary
technologies. We expense all of our product development costs as incurred, except for external
patent costs, which we capitalize and amortize over a 17-year period commencing with the issuance
date of each patent.
15
Table of Contents
Our product development costs decreased slightly in the three months ended July 31, 2008
compared to the three months ended July 31, 2007, primarily as a result of the need to allocate
more resources to revenue producing activities.
We introduced our current 40kW PowerBuoy system in fiscal 2006. One system was deployed off
the coast of New Jersey from October 2005 to October 2006, when it was removed from the ocean for
routine maintenance and diagnostic testing. This system was redeployed off the coast of New Jersey
in September 2007. Another 40kW system was deployed and tested in Hawaii for the US Navy project
during the month of June 2007. Work is currently in progress on the design and construction of two
150kW PowerBuoy systems in connection with projects in the Orkney Islands, Scotland and Oregon.
Selling, general and administrative costs
Our selling, general and administrative costs consist primarily of professional fees, salaries
and other personnel-related costs for employees and consultants engaged in sales and marketing and
support of our PowerBuoy systems and costs for executive, accounting and administrative personnel,
professional fees and other general corporate expenses.
Our selling, general and administrative costs increased in the three months ended July 31,
2008 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2007. This increase is due to increased costs
related to company growth, the expansion of our sales and marketing capabilities, including
increased headcount, and our becoming a public company in the United States in April 2007. We
expect our selling, general and administrative costs will continue to increase as we further grow
the company and expand our sales operations and our marketing capabilities.
Interest income
Interest income consists of interest received on cash and cash equivalents, investments in
commercial bank-issued certificates of deposit and US Treasury bills and notes. Prior to April 30,
2007, most of our cash, cash equivalents and bank-issued certificates of deposit resulted from the
remaining proceeds of our October 2003 common stock offering on the AIM market of the London Stock
Exchange. On April 30, 2007, we completed our initial public offering in the United States, which
resulted in net proceeds to us of $89.9 million. Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments were $96.5 million as of July 31, 2008, compared to $112.0 million as of July 31, 2007.
We anticipate that our interest income reported in fiscal 2009 will continue to be lower than the
comparable periods of the prior fiscal year as a result of the decrease in invested cash and lower
interest rates.
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
We transact business in various countries and have exposure to fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates. Foreign exchange gains and losses arise in the translation of
foreign-denominated assets and liabilities, which may result in realized and unrealized gains or
losses from exchange rate fluctuations. Since we conduct our business in US dollars and our
functional currency is the US dollar, our main foreign exchange exposure, if any, results from
changes in the exchange rate between the US dollar and the British pound sterling, the Euro and the
Australian dollar.
We invest in certificates of deposit and maintain cash accounts that are denominated in
British pounds, Euros and Australian dollars. These foreign-denominated certificates of deposit and
cash accounts had a balance of $7.9 million as of July 31, 2008 and $15.0 million as of July 31,
2007, compared to our total certificates of deposits and cash account balances of $96.5 million as
of July 31, 2008 and $112.0 million as of July 31, 2007. These foreign currency balances are
translated at each month end to our functional currency, the US dollar, and any resulting gain or
loss is recognized in our results of operations.
In addition, a portion of our operations is conducted through our subsidiaries in countries
other than the United States, specifically Ocean Power Technologies Ltd. in the United Kingdom, the
functional currency of which is the British pound sterling, and Ocean Power Technologies
(Australasia) Pty Ltd. in Australia, the functional currency of which is the Australian dollar.
Both of these subsidiaries have foreign exchange exposure that results from changes in the exchange
rate between their functional currency and other foreign currencies in which they conduct business.
All of our international revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2008 and 2007 were recorded in Euros, British pound sterling or Australian dollars.
We currently do not hedge our exchange rate exposure. However, we assess the anticipated
foreign currency working capital requirements and capital asset acquisitions of our foreign
operations and attempt to maintain a portion of our cash, cash equivalents and certificates of
deposit denominated in foreign currencies sufficient to satisfy these anticipated requirements. We
also assess the need and cost to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on an
ongoing basis and may hedge against exchange rate exposure in the future.
16
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended July 31, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended July 31, 2007
The following table contains selected statement of operations information, which serves as the
basis of the discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and
2008:
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Change 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
July 31, 2007 | July 31, 2008 | to 2007 Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
As a % of | As a % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Revenues | Amount | Revenues | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 555,704 | 100 | % | $ | 1,786,628 | 100 | % | $ | 1,230,924 | 222 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
804,992 | 145 | 1,948,146 | 109 | 1,143,154 | 142 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross loss |
(249,288 | ) | (45 | ) | (161,518 | ) | (9 | ) | 87,770 | (35 | ) | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product development costs |
1,815,734 | 327 | 1,702,949 | 95 | (112,785 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
and administrative costs |
1,996,602 | 359 | 2,551,816 | 143 | 555,214 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
3,812,336 | 686 | 4,254,765 | 238 | 442,429 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(4,061,624 | ) | (731 | ) | (4,416,283 | ) | (247 | ) | (354,659 | ) | 9 | |||||||||||||
Interest income |
1,444,286 | 260 | 547,592 | 30 | (896,694 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
179,494 | 32 | (24,473 | ) | (1 | ) | (203,967 | ) | (114 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,437,844 | ) | (439 | )% | $ | (3,893,164 | ) | (218 | )% | $ | (1,455,320 | ) | 60 | % | |||||||||
Revenues
Revenues increased by $1.2 million in the three months ended July 31, 2008, or 222%, to $1.8
million as compared to $0.6 million in the three months ended July 31, 2007. The increase in
revenues was primarily attributable to the following factors:
| Revenues relating to our utility PowerBuoy system increased by $0.8 million due to an increase in on-going work on our Hawaii project for the US Navy, work on the first phase of construction of a 1.39MW wave power station off the coast of Spain and work on the design, manufacture and installation of a wave power station consisting of a single 150kW PowerBuoy device in Orkney, Scotland. | |
| Revenues relating to our autonomous PowerBuoy system increased $0.4 million as a result of work on our $1.7 million contract with the US Navy to provide our PowerBuoy technology to a program for data gathering in the ocean. |
Cost of revenues
Cost of revenues increased by $1.1 million, or 142%, to $1.9 million in the three months ended
July 31, 2008, as compared to $0.8 million in the three months ended July 31, 2007. This increase
in cost of revenues reflected the higher level of activity on revenue-bearing contracts and the
recognition of an additional $0.2 million of anticipated loss at completion on our contract for a
wave power station off the coast of Spain. The additional anticipated loss was recognized based on
a change in estimated costs associated with this contract and our decision in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2008 to absorb additional costs beyond our contractual obligation for initial cost overruns
and certain other costs as set forth in the contract.
Product development costs
Product development costs decreased slightly to $1.7 million in the three months ended July
31, 2008, as compared to $1.8 million in the three months ended July 31, 2007, primarily as a
result of the need to allocate more resources to revenue producing activities. Product development
costs are primarily attributable to our work to increase the power output of our utility PowerBuoy
system, including the 150kW PowerBuoy system. We anticipate that our product development costs
related to the planned increase in the output of our utility PowerBuoy system will increase
significantly over the next several years and that the amount of these expenditures will not
necessarily be affected by the level of revenue generated over that time period.
17
Table of Contents
Selling, general and administrative costs
Selling, general and administrative costs increased $0.6 million, or 28%, to $2.6 million for
the three months ended July 31, 2008, as compared to $2.0 million for the three months ended July
31, 2007. The increase was attributable to an increase of $0.2 million in professional fees,
franchise taxes and costs incurred as a result of our becoming a public company in the United
States, and $0.4 million in additional payroll and incentive-based costs related to company growth.
Interest income
Interest income decreased by $0.9 million, or 62%, to $0.5 million for the three months ended
July 31, 2008, compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2007, due to a decrease
in invested cash and lower interest rates.
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
Foreign exchange loss was $24,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2008, compared to a
foreign exchange gain of $0.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2007. The difference was
primarily attributable to the relative change in value of the British pound sterling compared to
the US dollar during the two periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception, the cash flows from customer revenues have not been sufficient to fund
our operations and provide the capital resources for the planned growth of our business. For the
three years ended April 30, 2008, our revenues were $9.1 million, our net losses were $31.4 million
and our net cash used in operating activities was $26.2 million. Over that same period, we raised
$90.4 million in financing activities, including $89.9 million from the closing of our United
States initial public offering on April 30, 2007.
At July 31, 2008, our total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $96.5
million. Our cash and cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with maturities of three
months or less at the date of purchase and consist primarily of term deposits with large commercial
banks, Treasury bills and an investment in a money market fund. Our short-term investments consist
primarily of certificates of deposits and Treasury bills with fixed maturity dates of more than 90
days but less than one year from the date of purchase, and other investments with current
maturities of less than one year.
During the three months ended July 31, 2008, a $12.2 million US Treasury note was reclassified
from long-term investments to short-term investments, since as of July 31, 2008 the period
remaining until maturity was less than one year.
The primary drivers of our cash flows have been our ability to generate revenues and decrease
losses related to our contracts, as well as our ability to obtain and invest the capital resources
needed to fund our development.
Net cash used in operating activities was $4.2 million for the three months ended July 31,
2008 and $3.3 million for the three months ended July 31, 2007. The change was primarily the result
of an increase in net loss of $1.5 million. The increase in net loss was partially offset by a
decrease in cash used by operating assets and liabilities of $0.5 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was $10.9 million for the three months ended July 31,
2008 and $1.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2007. The change was primarily the result
of a net increase in purchases of securities with maturities longer than 90 days during the three
months ended July 31, 2008. Also, there was a $0.2 million increase in purchases of equipment
during the three months ended July 31, 2008 as compared to the three months ended July 31, 2007.
Net cash used in financing activities was $43,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2008,
compared to net cash used in financing activities of $0.8 million for the three months ended July
31, 2007. The cash used during the three months ended July 31, 2007 was primarily to pay accrued
expenses related to our initial public offering in the United States.
We expect to devote substantial resources to continue our development efforts for our
PowerBuoy systems and to expand our sales, marketing and manufacturing programs associated with the
commercialization of the PowerBuoy system. Our future capital requirements will depend on a number
of factors, including:
| the cost of development efforts for our PowerBuoy systems; | ||
| the success of our commercial relationships with Iberdrola, Total and the US Navy; | ||
| the cost of manufacturing activities; | ||
| the cost of commercialization activities, including demonstration projects, product marketing and sales; | ||
| our ability to establish and maintain additional commercial relationships; | ||
| the implementation of our expansion plans, including the hiring of new employees; |
18
Table of Contents
| potential acquisitions of other products or technologies; and | ||
| the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent claims and other patent-related costs. |
We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents and investments will be sufficient to meet
our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures at least through fiscal
2010. If existing resources are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements or if we acquire
or license rights to additional product technologies, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt
securities or obtain a credit facility. The sale of additional equity or convertible securities
could result in dilution to our stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance
of debt securities, these securities could have rights senior to those associated with our common
stock and could contain covenants that would restrict our operations. Financing may not be
available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us. If we are unable to obtain required financing,
we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned product development and marketing efforts,
which could harm our financial condition and operating results.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Since inception, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet financing activities.
19
Table of Contents
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We generally place our investments in money market funds, Treasury bills and certificates of
deposit with maturities of less than one year. We actively manage our portfolio of cash
equivalents and investments, but in order to ensure liquidity, we will only invest in instruments
with high credit quality where a secondary market exists. We have not held and do not hold any
derivatives related to our interest rate exposure. Due to the average maturity and conservative
nature of our investment portfolio, a change in interest rates would not have a material effect on
the value of the portfolio. We do not have market risk exposure on our long-term debt because it
consists of an interest-free loan from the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities.
Management estimates that had the average yield on our cash, cash equivalents and investments
decreased by 100 basis points, our interest income for the three months ended July 31, 2008 would
have decreased by approximately $0.2 million. This estimate assumes that the decrease occurred on
the first day of the fiscal year and reduced the yield of each investment by 100 basis points. The
impact on our future interest income of future changes in investment yields will depend largely on
the gross amount of our cash, cash equivalents and investments.
We transact business in various countries and have exposure to fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates. Foreign exchange gains and losses arise in the translation of
foreign-denominated assets and liabilities, which may result in realized and unrealized gains or
losses from exchange rate fluctuations. Since we conduct our business in US dollars and our
functional currency is the US dollar, our main foreign exchange exposure, if any, results from
changes in the exchange rate between the US dollar and the British pound sterling, the Euro and the
Australian dollar.
We maintain cash accounts that are denominated in British pound sterling, Euros and Australian
dollars. These foreign-denominated cash accounts had a balance of $7.9 million as of July 31, 2008,
compared to our total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment account balances of $96.5
million as of July 31, 2008. These foreign currency balances are translated at each month end to
our functional currency, the US dollar, and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in our results
of operations.
In addition, a portion of our operations is conducted through our subsidiaries in countries
other than the United States, specifically Ocean Power Technologies Ltd. in the United Kingdom, the
functional currency of which is the British pound sterling, and Ocean Power Technologies
(Australasia) Pty Ltd. in Australia, the functional currency of which is the Australian dollar.
Both of these subsidiaries have foreign exchange exposure that results from changes in the exchange
rate between their functional currency and other foreign currencies in which they conduct business.
All of our international revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2008 were recorded in Euros,
British pound sterling or Australian dollars. If foreign currency exchange rates had fluctuated by
10% as of July 31, 2008, the impact on our foreign exchange gains and losses would have been $0.8
million.
We currently do not hedge exchange rate exposure. However, we assess the anticipated foreign
currency working capital requirements and capital asset acquisitions of our foreign operations and
attempt to maintain a portion of our cash, cash equivalents and certificates of deposit denominated
in foreign currencies sufficient to satisfy these anticipated requirements. We also assess the need
and cost to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on an ongoing basis and may
hedge against exchange rate exposure in the future.
20
Table of Contents
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and other procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon that evaluation, as of
July 31, 2008, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
relating to the Company required to be included in our periodic SEC filings.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2008 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of
business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that
the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors
contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2008. These
risk factors describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject. These
risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse manner. There have been
no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on July 14, 2008.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Use of Proceeds
On April 30, 2007, we sold 5,000,000 shares of our common stock in our initial public offering
in the United States at a price of $20.00 per share, pursuant to a registration statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-138595), which was declared effective by the SEC on April 24, 2007. The managing
underwriters in the offering were UBS Securities LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, and Bear,
Stearns & Co., Inc. The underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us
aggregated $10.1 million, resulting in net proceeds to us of $89.9 million.
From the effective date of the registration statement through July 31, 2008, we used $0.7
million to construct demonstration wave power stations, $4.5 million to fund the continued
development and commercialization of our PowerBuoy system, $2.0 million to expand our sales and
marketing capabilities and $0.4 million to fund the expansion of assembly, test and field service
facilities. We have invested the balance of the net proceeds from the offering in short-term,
investment grade interest-bearing instruments, in accordance with our investment policy. We have
not used any of the net proceeds from the offering to make payments, directly or indirectly, to any
director or officer of ours, or any of their associates, to any person owning ten percent or more
of our common stock or to any affiliate of ours. There has been no material change in our planned
use of the balance of the net proceeds from the offering as described in our final prospectus filed
with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act of 1933.
21
Table of Contents
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
22
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OCEAN POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Registrant) |
||||
By: | /s/ George W. Taylor | |||
George W. Taylor | ||||
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
Date: September 9, 2008
By: | /s/ Charles F. Dunleavy | |||
Charles F. Dunleavy | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
||||
Date: September 9, 2008
23
Table of Contents
EXHIBITS INDEX
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
24