Ocean Thermal Energy Corp - Quarter Report: 2016 June (Form 10-Q)

q063016.htm

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

Commission File Number 033-19411-C

TetriDyn Solutions, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		20-5081381
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

800 South Queen Street, Lancaster, PA 17603
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(717) 715-0238
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

n/a
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of July 26, 2016, issuer had 60,404,140 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item	Description	Page

	PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	5
	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	16
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	16

	PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 3	Defaults upon Senior Securities	17
Item 6	Exhibits	18
	Signature	18

PART I–FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TETRIDYN SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

		June 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash		$	148	$	4,667
Prepaid Expenses			-		2,478
Total Current Assets			148		7,145
Total Assets		$	148	$	7,145

LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable		$	453,078	$	473,732
Accrued liabilities			357,025		321,827
Notes payable			299,612		299,612
Convertible note payable to related party, net of debt discount			579,380		467,628
Total Current Liabilities			1,689,095		1,562,799
Total Liabilities		$	1,689,095	$	1,562,799

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value
Authorized:	5,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding:	0 shares and 0
	shares, respectively		-		-
Common stock - $0.001 par value
Authorized:	100,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding:	60,404,140 shares and
	53,404,140 shares, respectively		60,404		53,404
Additional paid-in capital			3,371,324		3,164,991
Accumulated deficit			(5,120,675)		(4,774,049)
Total Stockholders' Deficit			(1,688,947)		(1,555,654)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit		$	148	$	7,145

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements.

TETRIDYN SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Revenue	$	1	$	2,073	$	50	$	3,763
Cost of Revenue		-		40		-		40
Gross Profit		1		2,033		50		3,723
Operating Expenses
General and administrative		231,128		17,435		252,295		26,330
Professional fees		21,998		33,300		47,074		68,810
Total Operating Expenses		253,126		50,735		299,369		95,140
Net Loss from Operations		(253,125)		(48,702)		(299,319)		(91,417)
Other Expenses
Interest expense		(15,810)		(10,884)		(47,307)		(22,682)
Total Other Expenses		(15,810)		(10,884)		(47,307)		(22,682)
Net Loss from Operations before
Provision for Income Taxes		(268,935)		(59,586)		(346,626)		(114,099)
Provision for Income Taxes		-		-		-		-
Net Loss	$	(268,935)	$	(59,586)	$	(346,626)	$	(114,099)

Total Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share	$	-	$	-	$	(0.01)	$	-

Basic and Diluted Weighted-Average
Common Shares Outstanding		59,942,602		53,404,140		56,673,371		41,882,418

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements.

TETRIDYN SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2016		2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Loss	$	(346,626)	$	$ (114,099)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Amortization of note discount		17,585		-
Stock compensation		210,000		-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		2,478		-
Accounts payable		(20,654)		13,924
Accrued liabilities		35,198		9,859
Customer deposits		-		(3,445)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(102,019)		(93,761)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from related-party debt		97,500		-
Proceeds from sale of common stock		-		100,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		97,500		100,000
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash		(4,519)		6,239
Cash at Beginning of Period		4,667		178
Cash at End of Period	$	148	$	6,417

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-	$	-
Cash paid for interest expense and lines of credit	$	8,156	$	3,789

Noncash Transactions:
Convertible note payable issued in exchange for existing convertible notes payable	$	-	$	394,380
Cancellation of preferred stock	$	-	$	1,200
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible notes payable	$	3,333	$	-


See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements.

TETRIDYN SOLUTIONS, INC., AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1–Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

Nature of Business–TetriDyn Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), optimizes business and information technology (IT) processes by using systems engineering methodologies, strategic planning, and system integration to develop radio-frequency identification products to address location tracking issues in the healthcare industry, including issues surrounding patient care; optimization of business processes for healthcare providers; improved reporting of incidents; and increased revenues for provided services.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position and results of operations.

It is management’s opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made that are necessary for a fair financial statements presentation. The results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, including the financial statements and notes thereto.

Note 2–Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation–The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, an Idaho corporation also named TetriDyn Solutions, Inc. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Business Segments–The Company had only one business segment for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

Use of Estimates–In preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents–For purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Revenue Recognition–Revenue from software licenses, related installation, and support services is recognized when earned and realizable. Revenue is earned and realizable when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; services, if requested by the customers, have been rendered and are determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Amounts received from customers before these criteria being met are deferred. Revenue from the sale of software is recognized when delivered to the customer or upon installation of the software if an installation contract exists. Revenue from post-contract support service is recognized as the services are provided, which is determined on an hourly basis. The Company recognizes the revenue received for unused support hours under support service contracts that have had no support activity after two years. Revenue applicable to multiple-element fee arrangements is divided among the software, the installation, and post-contract support service contracts using vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value, as evidenced by the prices charged when the software and the services are sold as separate products or arrangements.

The Company had one customer that represented 100% of its sales for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, and 2015.

Going Concern–The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. As reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company had a net loss of $346,626 and used $102,019 of cash in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The Company had a working capital deficiency of $1,688,947 and a stockholders’ deficit of $1,688,947 as of June 30, 2016. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on its ability to increase sales and obtain external funding for its product development. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Income Taxes–The Company accounts for income taxes under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740-10-25, Income Taxes. Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company’s recent equity raises, and possibly past restructuring events, have resulted in the occurrence of a triggering event as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which could limit the use of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards. The Company has yet to undertake a study to quantify any limitations on the use of its net operating loss carryforwards.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1	Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2	Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3	Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, customer deposits, notes payable, and related-party convertible note payable. Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and ASC 825, Financial Instruments, the fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents is determined based on Level 1 inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The Company believes that the recorded values of all of the other financial instruments approximate fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity for these instruments.

Property and Equipment–Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance, repairs, and renewals that neither materially add to the value of the property nor appreciably prolong its life are charged to expense as incurred. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset, which is set at five years for computing equipment and vehicles and seven years for office equipment. Gains or losses on dispositions of property and equipment are included in the results of operations when realized.

Net Loss per Common Share–Basic and diluted net loss per common share are computed based upon the weighted-average stock outstanding as defined by ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, 1,033,585 and 1,033,585, respectively, of common share equivalents for granted stock warrants were antidilutive and not used in the calculation of diluted net loss per share. Additionally, as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, 22,728,724 and 15,954,938, respectively, of common share equivalents for convertible note payables were antidilutive and not used in the calculation of diluted net loss per share.

Note 3–Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The update gives entities a single comprehensive model to use in reporting information about the amount and timing of revenue resulting from contracts to provide goods or services to customers. The proposed ASU, which would apply to any entity that enters into contracts to provide goods or services, would supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. Additionally, the update would supersede some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition–Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. The update removes inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements and provides a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues and more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements. In addition, the update improves comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets and simplifies the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. The update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. This updated guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern, which requires management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued and provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. All other entities should apply the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. All other entities may apply the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 earlier as of an annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. All other entities also may apply the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 earlier as of an annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning one year after the annual reporting period in which the entity first applies the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on its results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.

All other newly issued accounting pronouncements, but not yet effective, have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.

Note 4–Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $453,078 in accounts payable, $261,609 of which was due on multiple revolving credit cards under the name of the Company’s former chief executive officer (now deceased) or the name of the Company’s former president. These amounts represent advances to the Company from funds borrowed on credit cards in the names of these officers as an accommodation to the Company at a time when it was unable to obtain advances on its own credit. The obligations bear varying rates of interest between 5.25% and 27.24%. The Company agreed to reimburse these officers for these liabilities.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $357,025 in accrued liabilities. The accrued liabilities included $213,436 in unpaid salaries to two of its former officers, which were assigned by the officers to JPF Venture Group, Inc. (“JPF”), pursuant to an Investment Agreement dated March 12, 2015.

Note 5–Convertible Notes Payable and Advances Owed to Related Parties and Office Rental

On March 19, 2015, the Company exchanged convertible notes issued in 2010, 2011, and 2012, payable to its officers and directors in the aggregate principal amount of $320,246, plus accrued but unpaid interest of $74,134, into a single, $394,380 consolidated convertible note. The consolidated convertible note was assigned to JPF Venture Group, Inc. (“JPF”), the Company’s principal stockholder and an investment entity that is majority-owned by Jeremy Feakins, the Company’s director, chief executive officer, and chief financial officer. The new consolidated note is convertible to common stock at $0.025 per share, the approximate market price of the Company’s common stock as of the date of issuance. The note bears interest at 6% per annum and is due and payable within 90 days after demand. As of June 30, 2016, accrued but unpaid interest on this note was $35,569.

On June 23, 2015, the Company borrowed $50,000 from its principal stockholder, JPF, pursuant to a promissory note. The Company received $25,000 on July 31, 2015, and the remaining $25,000 on August 18, 2015. The terms of the note are as follows: (i) interest is payable at 6% per annum; (ii) the note is payable 90 days after demand; and (iii) the payee is authorized to convert part or all of the note balance and accrued interest, if any, into shares of the Company’s common stock at the rate of one share each for $0.03 of principal amount of the note. As of June 30, 2016, the outstanding balance was $50,000, plus accrued interest of $2,717. The Company recorded a debt discount of $50,000 for the fair value of the beneficial conversion feature. As of June 30, 2016, the Company amortized $50,000 of the debt discount.

On November 23, 2015, the Company borrowed $50,000 from its principal stockholder, JPF, pursuant to a promissory note. The Company received $37,500 before December 31, 2015, and the remaining $12,500 was received after the year-end. The terms of the note are as follows: (i) interest is payable at 6% per annum; (ii) the note is payable 90 days after demand; and (iii) the payee is authorized to convert part or all of the note balance and accrued interest, if any, into shares of the Company’s common stock at the rate of one share each for $0.03 of principal amount of the note. As of June 30, 2016, the outstanding balance was $50,000, plus accrued interest of $1,700. The Company recorded a debt discount of $28,000 for the fair value of the beneficial conversion feature. As of June 30, 2016, the Company amortized $28,000 of the debt discount on that debt.

On February 25, 2016, the Company borrowed $50,000 from its principal stockholder JPF pursuant to a promissory note. The terms of the note are as follows: (i) interest is payable at 6% per annum; (ii) the note is payable 90 days after demand; and (iii) the payee is authorized to convert part or all of the note balance and accrued interest, if any, into shares of our common stock at the rate of one share for each $0.03 of principal amount of the note. As of June 30, 2016, the outstanding balance was $50,000, plus accrued interest of $1,400. No beneficial conversion feature existed as the stock price on the date of issuance was equal to the conversion price.

On May 20, 2016, the Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $50,000 to its principal stockholder, JPF. The terms of the note are as follows: (i) interest is payable at 6% per annum; (ii) the note is payable 90 days after demand; and (iii) the payee is authorized to convert part or all of the note balance and accrued interest, if any, into shares of our common stock at the rate of one share for each $0.03 of principal amount of the note. As of June 30, 2016, the outstanding balance was $47,500, plus accrued interest of $980. No beneficial conversion feature existed as the stock price on the date of issuance was equal to the conversion price.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $579,380 in convertible notes payable due to related parties, with $37,337 in accrued interest.

On March 1, 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement with a company whose managing partner is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and rents space on a month-to-month basis with no long-term commitment. The monthly rent is $2,500 per month and commenced on April 1, 2015, when the Company began occupying the space. Rent expense per this agreement is $7,500 and $15,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

Note 6–Notes Payable in Default

As of October 25, 2011, a loan from one economic development entity was in default. The loan principal was $50,000 with accrued interest of $14,411 through June 30, 2016. The Company plans to work with the entity to arrange for an extension on the loan.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company was delinquent in payments on two loans to a second economic development entity. The Company owed this economic entity $73,470 in late payments, with an outstanding balance of $163,791 and accrued interest of $30,896 as of June 30, 2016. Both loans were guaranteed by two of the Company’s officers. One loan is secured by liens on intangible software assets, and the other loan is secured by the officers’ personal property. The Company is working with this entity to bring the payments current as soon as cash flow permits.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company was delinquent in payments on a loan to a third economic development entity. The Company owed the third economic entity $82,070 in late payments, with an outstanding balance of $85,821 and accrued interest of $24,204 as of June 30, 2016. This loan is secured by a junior lien on all the Company’s assets and shares of founders’ common stock. The Company is working with this entity to bring the payments current as soon as cash flow permits.

Note 7–Stockholders’ Deficit

Stock-Based Compensation–On April 6, 2016, the Company’s board of directors approved the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan under which up to 12,000,000 shares of common stock may be issued. On April 6, 2016, 7,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to officers and advisors in accordance with the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan with a fair value of $210,000. The 2016 plan is to be administered either by the board of directors or by the appropriate committee to be appointed from time to time by the board of directors. Awards granted under the 2016 plan may be incentive stock options (“ISOs”) (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code), appreciation rights, options that do not qualify as ISOs, or stock bonus awards that are awarded to employees, officers, and directors who, in the opinion of the board or the committee, have contributed or are expected to contribute materially to the Company’s success. In addition, at the discretion of the board of directors or the committee, options or bonus stock may be granted to individuals who are not employees, officers, or directors, but contribute to the Company’s success. The 2016 plan must be approved by the stockholders within one year of board adoption in order to permit the grant of incentive stock options.

Equity instruments issued to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by ASC 505, Share-Based Payment. Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, Issue 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments. In general, the measurement date is when either: (a) a performance commitment, as defined, is reached; or (b) the earlier of: (i) the nonemployee performance is complete; or (ii) the instruments are vested. The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the EITF.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 505 for its stock-based compensation plan. Under ASC 505, all employee stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the option or award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period, which is typically through the date the options or awards vest. The Company adopted ASC 505 using the modified prospective method. Under this method, for all stock-based options and awards granted before January 1, 2006, that remain outstanding as of that date, compensation cost is recognized for the unvested portion over the remaining requisite service period, using the grant-date fair value measured under the original provisions of ASC 505 for pro forma and disclosure purposes. Furthermore, compensation costs will also be recognized for any awards issued, modified, repurchased, or cancelled after January 1, 2006.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to our financial statements included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors discussed elsewhere in this report.

Certain information included herein contains statements that may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), such as statements relating to our anticipated revenues, gross margin and operating results, estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements, future performance and operations, plans for future expansion, capital spending, sources of liquidity, and financing sources. Forward-looking information involves important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect anticipated results in the future, and accordingly, such results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made herein. These risks and uncertainties include those relating to our liquidity requirements; the continued growth of the software and IT services industries; the success of our product development, marketing, and sales activities; vigorous competition in the software industry; dependence on existing management; leverage and debt service (including sensitivity to fluctuations in interest rates); domestic or global economic conditions; the inherent uncertainty and costs of prolonged arbitration or litigation; and changes in federal or state tax laws or the administration of such laws.

Overview

We optimize business and IT processes by using systems engineering methodologies, strategic development, and integration to add efficiency and value to our customers’ business processes and to help our customers identify critical success factors in their business.

We provide business IT solutions to the healthcare industry. We are expanding our service offerings into selected other professional industries as those markets develop and as we develop new applications for our integrated system of radio frequency identification and software solutions for tracking, management, and diagnostic systems.

Revenue

We have only generated nominal revenue during the periods covered by this report as our activities consist principally of testing our products.

Description of Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs for accounting, administration, finance, human resources, and information systems.

Professional fees expenses consist primarily of fees related to legal, outside accounting, auditing, and investor relations services.

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 985, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed, development costs incurred in the research and development of new software products to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility in the form of a working model has been established. Internally generated, capitalizable software development costs have not been material to date. We have charged our software development costs to research and development expense in our statements of operations.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance, repairs, and renewals that neither materially add to the value of the property nor appreciably prolong its life are charged to expense as incurred. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Gains or losses on dispositions of property and equipment are included in the results of operations when realized.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

Revenues and Cost of Revenue

Our revenue of $1 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, and $2,073 for the three months ended June 30, 2015, was not material.

Operating Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $231,128 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $17,435 for the three months ended June 30, 2015, representing an increase of $213,693, or over 12 times the amount in the earlier period. The increase in our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015, reflects increased stock compensation.

Professional fees expenses were $21,998 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $33,300 for the three months ended June 30, 2015, representing a decrease of $11,302, or 34%, for the three-month periods. The decrease in our professional fees expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015, reflects additional legal fees that were associated with investment and acquisition negotiations in 2015.

Interest expense was $15,810 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to $10,884 for the three months ended June 30, 2015, representing an increase of $4,926, or 45%, for the three-month periods. The change in interest expense was due to an increase in outstanding indebtedness and amortization of debt discount in the current year over the prior year.

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

Revenues and Cost of Revenue

Our revenue of $50 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and $3,763 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, was not material.

Operating Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $252,295 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $26,330 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, representing an increase of $225,965, or over eight times the amount of the earlier period. The increase in our general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015, reflects increased stock compensation.

Professional fees expenses were $47,074 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $68,810 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, representing a decrease of $21,736, or 32%, for the six-month periods. The decrease in our professional fees expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015, reflects additional legal fees that were associated with investment and acquisition negotiations in 2015.

Interest expense was $47,307 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to $22,682 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, representing an increase of $24,625, or 109%, for the six-month periods. The change in interest expense was due to an increase in outstanding indebtedness and amortization of debt discount in the current year over the prior year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2016, our principal source of liquidity consisted of $148 of cash, as compared to $4,667 of cash at December 31, 2015. In addition, our stockholders’ deficit was $1,688,947 at June 30, 2016, compared to stockholders’ deficit of $1,555,654 at December 31, 2015, an increase in the deficit of $133,293.

Our operations used net cash of $102,019 during the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to using net cash of $93,761 during the six months ended June 30, 2015. The $8,258 increase in cash used was the result of an increase in accrued liabilities partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable.

Investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, did not use or provide cash, reflecting our limited activities.

Financing activities provided cash of $97,500 for our operations during the six months ended June 30, 2016, due to a loan from a related party, reflecting our dependence on external financing.

We are focusing our efforts on completing testing of our product, so that we can commence sales to generate revenue while we explore external funding alternatives as our current cash is insufficient to fund operations for the next 12 months. We expect that new sales will enable us to begin our payments on indebtedness and support the development of other products. Although our independent auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, we feel that our revenues are sufficient for our IT business solutions segment to continue as a going concern. However, in order to expand our product offerings, we expect that we will require additional investments and sales.

As we continue development of new products and identify specific commercialization opportunities, we will focus on those product markets and opportunities for which we might be able to get external funding through joint venture agreements, strategic partnerships, or other direct investments.

We have no significant contractual obligations or commercial commitments not reflected on our balance sheet as of this date.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified the policies outlined below as critical to our business operations and an understanding of our results of operations. The list is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP, with no need for management’s judgment in its application. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations when such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see the notes to the December 31, 2015, consolidated financial statements. Note that our preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our condensed consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from software licenses and related installation and support services is recognized when earned and realizable. Revenue is earned and realizable when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; services, if requested by the customers, have been rendered and are determinable; and ability to collect is reasonably assured. Amounts billed to customers before these criteria being met are deferred. Revenue from the sale of software is recognized when delivered to the customer or upon installation of the software if an installation contract exists. Revenue from post-contract telephone support service contracts is recognized as the services are provided, determined on an hourly basis.

Revenue applicable to multiple-element fee arrangements is divided among the software, the installation, and post-contract support service contracts using vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value, as evidenced by the prices charged when the software and the services are sold as separate products or arrangements.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes under ASC 740-10-25, Income Taxes. Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The update gives entities a single comprehensive model to use in reporting information about the amount and timing of revenue resulting from contracts to provide goods or services to customers. The proposed ASU, which would apply to any entity that enters into contracts to provide goods or services, would supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. Additionally, the update would supersede some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition–Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. The update removes inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements and provides a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues and more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements. In addition, the update improves comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets and simplifies the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. The update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. This updated guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.

All other newly issued accounting pronouncements, but not yet effective, have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities.”

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us, in the reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms and that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer (whom we refer to in this periodic report as our Certifying Officer), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Certifying Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2016, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Certifying Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance as of June 30, 2016, because certain deficiencies involving internal controls constituted material weaknesses, as discussed below. The material weaknesses identified did not result in the restatement of any previously reported financial statements or any other related financial disclosure, and management does not believe that the material weaknesses had any effect on the accuracy of our financial statements for the current reporting period.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

A system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the system will meet its objectives. The design of a control system is based, in part, upon the benefits of the control system relative to its costs. Control systems can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. In addition, over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future events.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control of over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. We have assessed the effectiveness of those internal controls as of June 30, 2016, using the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) as a basis for our assessment.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance respecting financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.

A material weakness in internal controls is a deficiency in internal control, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects our ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.

Based on our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30, 2016.

As of June 30, 2016, management identified the following material weaknesses:

●	Control Environment—We did not maintain an effective control environment for internal control over financial reporting.

●	Segregation of Duties—As a result of limited resources and staff, we did not maintain proper segregation of incompatible duties. The effect of the lack of segregation of duties potentially affects multiple processes and procedures.

●

Entity Level Controls—We failed to maintain certain entity-level controls as defined by the framework issued by COSO. Specifically, our lack of staff does not allow us to effectively maintain a sufficient number of adequately trained personnel necessary to anticipate and identify risks critical to financial reporting. There is a risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements could be caused, or at least not be detected in a timely manner, due to lack of adequate staff with such expertise.

●	Access to Cash—One executive had the ability to transfer from our bank accounts.

These weaknesses are continuing. Management and the board of directors are aware of these weaknesses that result because of limited resources and staff. Management has begun the process of formally documenting our key processes as a starting point for improved internal control over financial reporting. Efforts to fully implement the processes we have designed have been put on hold due to limited resources, but we anticipate a renewed focus on this effort in the near future. Due to our limited financial and managerial resources, we cannot assure when we will be able to implement effective internal controls over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2016, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II–OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS ON SECURITIES

As of October 25, 2011, a loan from one economic development entity was in default. The loan principal was $50,000 with accrued interest of $14,411 through June 30, 2016.

As of June 30, 2016, we were delinquent in payments on two loans to a second economic development entity. We owed this economic entity $73,470 in late payments with an outstanding balance of $163,791 and accrued interest of $30,896 as of June 30, 2016. Both loans were guaranteed by two of our officers. One loan is secured by liens on intangible software assets and the other loan is secured by the officers’ personal property.

As of June 30, 2016, we were delinquent in payments on a loan to a third economic development entity. We owed the third economic entity $82,070 in late payments with an outstanding balance of $85,821 and accrued interest of $24,204 as of June 30, 2016. This loan is secured by a junior lien on all our assets and shares of founders’ common stock.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:

Exhibit Number*	Title of Document	Location

Item 10	Material Contracts
10.29	Promissory Note for $50,000 dated May 20, 2016	Incorporated by reference from the current report on Form 8-K filed May 24, 2016.

Item 31	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
31.01	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14	Attached.

Item 32	Section 1350 Certifications
32.01	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Attached.

Item 101	Interactive Data
101	Interactive Data files	Attached

_______________

*	All exhibits are numbered with the number preceding the decimal indicating the applicable SEC reference number in Item 601 and the number following the decimal indicating the sequence of the particular document. Omitted numbers in the sequence refer to documents previously filed as an exhibit.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	TETRIDYN SOLUTIONS, INC.



Date: July 27, 2016	By:	/s/ Jeremy P. Feakins
		Jeremy P. Feakins
		Chief Executive Officer and
		Chief Financial Officer