OFG BANCORP - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-12647
Oriental Financial Group Inc.
Incorporated in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, | IRS Employer Identification No. 66-0538893 |
Principal Executive Offices:
997 San Roberto Street
Oriental Center 10th Floor
Professional Offices Park
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00926
Telephone Number: (787) 771-6800
997 San Roberto Street
Oriental Center 10th Floor
Professional Offices Park
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00926
Telephone Number: (787) 771-6800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated Filer þ | Non-Accelerated Filer o | Smaller Reporting Company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, as of the latest
practicable date:
46,317,008 common shares ($1.00 par value per share) outstanding as of October 31, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
When used in this Form 10-Q or future filings by Oriental Financial Group Inc. (the Group) with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), in the Groups press releases or other public
or shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized
executive officer, the words or phrases would be, will allow, intends to, will likely
result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimated, project, believe,
should or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The future results of the Group could be affected by subsequent events and could differ materially
from those expressed in forward-looking statements. If future events and actual performance differ
from the Groups assumptions, the actual results could vary significantly from the performance
projected in the forward-looking statements.
The Group wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date made and are based on managements current
expectations, and to advise readers that various factors, including local, regional and national
economic conditions, substantial changes in levels of market interest rates, credit and other risks
of lending and investment activities, competitive, and regulatory factors, legislative changes and
accounting pronouncements, could affect the Groups financial performance and could cause the
Groups actual results for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected.
The Group does not undertake, and specifically disclaims, any obligation to update any
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after
the date of such statements.
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 89,703 | $ | 247,691 | ||||
Money market investments |
53,233 | 29,432 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
142,936 | 277,123 | ||||||
Investments: |
||||||||
Trading securities, at fair value, with amortized cost of $100 (December 31, 2009 - $522) |
102 | 523 | ||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value, with amortized cost of $4,304,055 (December 31, 2009 - $5,044,017) |
4,317,088 | 4,953,659 | ||||||
Other investments |
150 | 150 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost |
22,496 | 19,937 | ||||||
Total investments |
4,339,836 | 4,974,269 | ||||||
Securities sold but not yet delivered |
317,209 | | ||||||
Loans: |
||||||||
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value |
31,432 | 27,261 | ||||||
Loans not covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $29,640 (December 31, 2009 - $23,272) |
1,107,338 | 1,112,808 | ||||||
Loans covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC |
722,858 | | ||||||
Total loans, net |
1,861,628 | 1,140,069 | ||||||
FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset |
562,364 | | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC |
19,322 | | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate not covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC |
13,765 | 9,347 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
30,644 | 33,656 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset, net |
30,650 | 31,685 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
17,125 | 19,775 | ||||||
Core deposit intangible |
1,363 | | ||||||
Servicing asset |
9,647 | 7,120 | ||||||
Other assets |
56,568 | 57,789 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,403,057 | $ | 6,550,833 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 888,011 | $ | 693,506 | ||||
Savings accounts |
234,501 | 86,792 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit |
1,472,763 | 965,203 | ||||||
Total deposits |
2,595,275 | 1,745,501 | ||||||
Borrowings: |
||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
29,959 | 49,179 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,541,520 | 3,557,308 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB |
281,753 | 281,753 | ||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
105,112 | 105,834 | ||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
36,083 | 36,083 | ||||||
Total borrowings |
3,994,427 | 4,030,157 | ||||||
Securities purchased but not yet received |
| 413,359 | ||||||
FDIC net settlement payable |
41,601 | | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
54,694 | 31,650 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
6,685,997 | 6,220,667 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 1,340,000 shares of Series A and 1,380,000 shares of Series B issued and
outstanding, $25 liquidation value |
68,000 | 68,000 | ||||||
Common stock, $1 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 - 40,000,000); 47,807,734 shares issued;
46,317,008 shares outstanding (December 31, 2009 - 25,739,397; 24,235,088) |
47,808 | 25,739 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
498,486 | 213,445 | ||||||
Legal surplus |
46,958 | 45,279 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
59,845 | 77,584 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,490,726 shares (December 31, 2009 - 1,504,309 shares) |
(17,116 | ) | (17,142 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax of ($128) (December 31, 2009 - $7,445) |
13,079 | (82,739 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
717,060 | 330,166 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 7,403,057 | $ | 6,550,833 | ||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTERS AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
Quarter Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 34,347 | $ | 18,248 | $ | 81,382 | $ | 55,329 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
40,429 | 48,750 | 125,542 | 151,179 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities and other |
6,445 | 11,552 | 24,476 | 38,078 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
81,221 | 78,550 | 231,400 | 244,586 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
12,680 | 13,990 | 35,874 | 41,962 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
25,128 | 27,209 | 75,900 | 90,937 | ||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB and other borrowings |
3,082 | 3,106 | 9,147 | 9,277 | ||||||||||||
Note Payable to the FDIC |
823 | | 1,887 | | ||||||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
1,021 | 1,021 | 3,063 | 2,154 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
327 | 333 | 930 | 1,158 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
43,061 | 45,659 | 126,801 | 145,488 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
38,160 | 32,891 | 104,599 | 99,098 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
4,100 | 4,400 | 12,214 | 11,250 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses |
34,060 | 28,491 | 92,385 | 87,848 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Wealth management revenues |
4,554 | 3,764 | 13,157 | 10,163 | ||||||||||||
Banking service revenues |
3,414 | 1,424 | 8,030 | 4,330 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage banking activities |
3,418 | 2,232 | 7,555 | 7,191 | ||||||||||||
Investment banking revenues (losses) |
59 | | 93 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||
Total banking and wealth management revenues |
11,445 | 7,420 | 28,835 | 21,680 | ||||||||||||
Total loss on other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
(14,739 | ) | (44,737 | ) | (39,674 | ) | (107,331 | ) | ||||||||
Portion of loss on securities recognized in other comprehensive
income |
| 36,478 | 22,508 | 94,656 | ||||||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairments on securities |
(14,739 | ) | (8,259 | ) | (17,166 | ) | (12,675 | ) | ||||||||
Net gain (loss) on: |
||||||||||||||||
Sale of securities |
13,954 | 35,528 | 37,807 | 56,388 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
(22,580 | ) | (64 | ) | (59,832 | ) | 19,778 | |||||||||
Early extinguishment of repurchase agreements |
| (17,551 | ) | | (17,551 | ) | ||||||||||
Trading securities |
4 | (505 | ) | 2 | 12,427 | |||||||||||
Bargain purchase from FDIC-assisted acquisition |
| | 9,940 | | ||||||||||||
Fair value adjustment on FDIC equity appreciation instrument |
| | 909 | | ||||||||||||
Accretion of FDIC loss-share indemnification asset |
1,756 | | 3,314 | | ||||||||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
(140 | ) | (278 | ) | (283 | ) | (576 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
(8 | ) | 31 | 61 | 94 | |||||||||||
Total non-interest income (loss), net |
(10,308 | ) | 16,322 | 3,587 | 79,565 | |||||||||||
Non-interest expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
11,732 | 7,882 | 30,440 | 23,626 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
5,620 | 3,747 | 13,815 | 10,994 | ||||||||||||
Professional and service fees |
5,480 | 2,459 | 11,552 | 7,461 | ||||||||||||
Insurance |
1,651 | 1,273 | 5,218 | 5,560 | ||||||||||||
Taxes, other than payroll and income taxes |
1,611 | 834 | 3,759 | 2,129 | ||||||||||||
Advertising and business promotion |
1,275 | 1,097 | 3,339 | 3,329 | ||||||||||||
Electronic banking charges |
1,322 | 471 | 3,112 | 1,607 | ||||||||||||
Communication |
826 | 382 | 1,905 | 1,163 | ||||||||||||
Loan servicing expenses |
443 | 397 | 1,321 | 1,167 | ||||||||||||
Clearing and wrap fees expenses |
579 | 293 | 1,217 | 860 | ||||||||||||
Foreclosure and repossession expenses |
545 | 204 | 1,117 | 650 | ||||||||||||
Director and investors relations |
396 | 348 | 1,098 | 1,029 | ||||||||||||
Printing, postage, stationery and supplies |
299 | 194 | 795 | 665 | ||||||||||||
Training and travel |
167 | 194 | 639 | 444 | ||||||||||||
Other |
759 | 710 | 1,623 | 1,287 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest expenses |
32,705 | 20,485 | 80,950 | 61,971 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(8,953 | ) | 24,328 | 15,022 | 105,442 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(2,358 | ) | 3,001 | (262 | ) | 8,452 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(6,595 | ) | 21,327 | 15,284 | 96,990 | |||||||||||
Less: Dividends on preferred stock |
(1,200 | ) | (1,201 | ) | (4,134 | ) | (3,602 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Deemed
dividend on preferred stock beneficial conversion feature |
(22,711 | ) | | (22,711 | ) | | ||||||||||
Income available (loss) to common shareholders |
$ | (30,506 | ) | $ | 20,126 | $ | (11,561 | ) | $ | 93,388 | ||||||
Income (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.67 | ) | $ | 0.83 | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 3.85 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.67 | ) | $ | 0.83 | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 3.84 | ||||||
Average common shares outstanding |
45,354 | 24,303 | 34,823 | 24,284 | ||||||||||||
Average potential common shares-options |
128 | 65 | 105 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Average diluted common shares outstanding |
45,482 | 24,368 | 34,928 | 24,301 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends per share of common stock |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Preferred stock: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 68,000 | $ | 68,000 | ||||
Issuance of preferred stock |
177,289 | | ||||||
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock |
(177,289 | ) | | |||||
Balance at end of period |
68,000 | 68,000 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital from beneficial conversion feature |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
| | ||||||
Issuance of preferred stock beneficial conversion feature |
22,711 | | ||||||
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock beneficial conversion feature |
(22,711 | ) | | |||||
Balance at end of period |
| | ||||||
Common stock: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
25,739 | 25,739 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
8,740 | | ||||||
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock |
13,320 | | ||||||
Exercised stock options |
9 | | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
47,808 | 25,739 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
213,445 | 212,625 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
90,896 | | ||||||
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock |
186,680 | | ||||||
Deemed dividend on preferred stock beneficial conversion feature |
22,711 | | ||||||
Exercised stock options |
64 | | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
865 | 550 | ||||||
Capital contribution |
| 89 | ||||||
Common stock issuance costs |
(5,250 | ) | | |||||
Preferred stock issuance costs |
(10,925 | ) | | |||||
Balance at end of period |
498,486 | 213,264 | ||||||
Legal surplus: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
45,279 | 43,016 | ||||||
Transfer from retained earnings |
1,679 | 9,643 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
46,958 | 52,659 | ||||||
Retained earnings: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
77,584 | 51,233 | ||||||
Cumulative effect on initial adoption of accounting principle |
| 14,359 | ||||||
Net income |
15,284 | 96,990 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
(4,499 | ) | (2,916 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock |
(4,134 | ) | (3,602 | ) | ||||
Deemed dividend on preferred stock beneficial conversion feature |
(22,711 | ) | | |||||
Transfer to legal surplus |
(1,679 | ) | (9,643 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
59,845 | 146,421 | ||||||
Treasury stock: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
(17,142 | ) | (17,109 | ) | ||||
Stock purchased |
| (182 | ) | |||||
Stock used to match defined contribution plan |
26 | 144 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
(17,116 | ) | (17,147 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
(82,739 | ) | (122,187 | ) | ||||
Cumulative effect on initial adoption of accounting principle |
| (14,359 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
95,818 | 30,179 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
13,079 | (106,367 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
$ | 717,060 | $ | 382,569 | ||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE QUARTERS AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
Nine-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (6,595 | ) | $ | 21,327 | $ | 15,284 | $ | 96,990 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale
arising during the period |
(15,072 | ) | 30,026 | 124,302 | 75,015 | |||||||||||
Realized gain on investment securities included in net income |
(14,224 | ) | (35,528 | ) | (38,077 | ) | (56,388 | ) | ||||||||
Total loss on other- than-temporarily impaired securities |
14,739 | 44,737 | 39,674 | 107,331 | ||||||||||||
Portion of loss on securities recognized in other
comprehensive income |
| (36,478 | ) | (22,508 | ) | (94,656 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax effect related to unrealized gain on securities
available-for-sale |
2,274 | 716 | (7,573 | ) | (1,123 | ) | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period |
(12,283 | ) | 3,473 | 95,818 | 30,179 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (18,878 | ) | $ | 24,800 | $ | 111,102 | $ | 127,169 | |||||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 15,284 | $ | 96,990 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees, net of costs |
565 | 151 | ||||||
Amortization of premiums, net of accretion of discounts |
24,663 | 9,070 | ||||||
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
60 | | ||||||
Accretion of FDIC loss-share indemnification asset |
(3,314 | ) | | |||||
Amortization of accretable yield on loans covered by FDIC shared-loss agreements |
(28,592 | ) | | |||||
Other-than-temporary impairments on securities |
17,166 | 12,675 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
4,152 | 4,505 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
(6,538 | ) | 750 | |||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
12,214 | 11,250 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
865 | 550 | ||||||
Fair value adjustment of servicing asset |
(1,538 | ) | (4,430 | ) | ||||
Bargain
purchase gain from FDIC assisted acquisition |
(9,940 | ) | | |||||
(Gain) loss on: |
||||||||
Sale of securities |
(37,807 | ) | (56,388 | ) | ||||
Sale of mortgage loans held for sale |
(4,332 | ) | (2,761 | ) | ||||
Derivatives |
59,832 | (19,778 | ) | |||||
Early extinguishment of repurchase agreements |
| 17,551 | ||||||
Sale of foreclosed real estate |
283 | 576 | ||||||
Sale of premises and equipment |
44 | (60 | ) | |||||
Originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale |
(169,205 | ) | (169,598 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
58,646 | 88,838 | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in: |
||||||||
Trading securities |
422 | 217 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
3,012 | 3,944 | ||||||
Other assets |
(226 | ) | (4,679 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||
Accrued interest on deposits and borrowings |
(260 | ) | (3,525 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
34,808 | 10,954 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(29,735 | ) | (3,198 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of: |
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
(5,308,688 | ) | (9,290,454 | ) | ||||
FHLB stock |
(2,560 | ) | (13,355 | ) | ||||
Equity options |
(1,747 | ) | (3,738 | ) | ||||
Maturities and redemptions of: |
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
2,370,912 | 3,251,327 | ||||||
FHLB stock |
10,077 | 14,431 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of: |
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
3,052,533 | 6,090,572 | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
5,197 | 6,594 | ||||||
Premises and equipment |
573 | 114 | ||||||
Origination and purchase of loans, excluding loans held-for-sale |
(101,595 | ) | (60,370 | ) | ||||
Principal repayment of loans |
180,140 | 92,437 | ||||||
Additions to premises and equipment |
(1,483 | ) | (3,577 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents received in FDIC-assisted transaction |
89,777 | | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
293,137 | 83,981 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||
Deposits |
119,544 | 142,761 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
(15,000 | ) | (217,551 | ) | ||||
Short term borrowings |
(19,220 | ) | 6,135 | |||||
Proceeds from: |
||||||||
Issuance of FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
| 105,000 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB |
| 761,380 | ||||||
Exercise of stock options |
73 | | ||||||
Issuance of common stock, net |
94,386 | | ||||||
Issuance of preferred stock, net |
189,075 | | ||||||
Capital contribution |
| 89 | ||||||
Repayments of advances from FHLB |
| (788,080 | ) | |||||
Repayments of advances from note payable to the FDIC |
(715,970 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| (182 | ) | |||||
Termination of derivative instruments |
(42,727 | ) | 20,254 | |||||
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
(2,934 | ) | (3,602 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid on common stock |
(4,816 | ) | (2,916 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(397,589 | ) | 23,288 | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
(134,187 | ) | 104,071 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
277,123 | 66,372 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 142,936 | $ | 170,443 | ||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONT.)
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONT.)
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosure and Schedule of Non-cash Activities: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 126,569 | $ | 149,012 | ||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 6,281 | $ | 74 | ||||
Mortgage loans securitized into mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 109,386 | $ | 105,676 | ||||
Securities sold but not yet delivered |
$ | 317,209 | $ | 417,280 | ||||
Securities purchased but not yet received |
$ | | $ | 30,945 | ||||
Transfer from loans to foreclosed real estate |
$ | 11,693 | $ | 6,327 | ||||
Reclassification of loans held for investment portfolio to the held for sale portfolio |
$ | | $ | 19,832 | ||||
Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Acquisitions: |
||||||||
Non-cash assets acquired: |
||||||||
FHLB stock |
$ | 10,077 | $ | | ||||
Loans covered under shared-loss agreements with FDIC |
787,177 | | ||||||
Loans not covered under shared-loss agreements with FDIC |
2,987 | | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate covered under shared-loss agreements with FDIC |
17,527 | | ||||||
Other repossessed assets covered under shared-loss agreements with FDIC |
3,062 | | ||||||
FDIC loss-share indemnification asset |
559,050 | | ||||||
Core deposit intangible |
1,423 | | ||||||
Other assets |
5,301 | | ||||||
Total non-cash assets acquired |
1,386,604 | | ||||||
Liabilities assumed: |
||||||||
Deposits |
729,546 | | ||||||
Deferred income tax liability, net |
3,876 | | ||||||
Other liabilities |
9,426 | | ||||||
Total liabilities assumed |
742,848 | | ||||||
Net non-cash assets acquired |
643,756 | | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents received in the FDIC-assisted transaction |
89,777 | | ||||||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 733,533 | $ | | ||||
Consideration at fair value: |
||||||||
Note payable issued to the FDIC |
715,970 | | ||||||
Net settlement payable to the FDIC |
10,590 | | ||||||
Equity appreciation instrument |
909 | | ||||||
727,469 | | |||||||
Net after tax bargain purchase gain from FDIC-assisted acquisition |
6,064 | | ||||||
$ | 733,533 | $ | | |||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accounting and reporting policies of Oriental Financial Group Inc. (the Group or Oriental)
conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and to financial services
industry practices.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited statements are, in
the opinion of management, a fair statement of the results for the periods reported and include all
necessary adjustments, all of a normal recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations.
Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. The results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For further
information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year
ended December 31, 2009, included in the Groups 2009 annual report on Form 10-K, as amended.
Nature of Operations
The Group is a publicly-owned financial holding company incorporated under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. It has four direct subsidiaries, Oriental Bank and Trust (the Bank),
Oriental Financial Services Corp. (Oriental Financial Services), Oriental Insurance, Inc.
(Oriental Insurance) and Caribbean Pension Consultants, Inc., which is located in Boca Raton,
Florida. The Group also has a special purpose entity, Oriental Financial (PR) Statutory Trust II
(the Statutory Trust II). Through these subsidiaries and its divisions, the Group provides a wide
range of financial services such as mortgage, commercial and consumer lending, leasing, financial
planning, insurance sales, money management and investment banking and brokerage services, as well
as corporate and individual trust services.
The main offices of the Group and its subsidiaries are located in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The Group
is subject to examination, regulation and periodic reporting under the U.S. Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956, as amended, which is administered by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System.
The Bank is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of the
Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico (OCFI) and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC). The Bank offers banking services such as commercial and consumer lending,
leasing, savings and time deposit products, financial planning, and corporate and individual trust
services, and capitalizes on its commercial banking network to provide mortgage lending products to
its clients. Oriental International Bank Inc. (OIB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank,
operates as an international banking entity (IBE) pursuant to the International Banking Center
Regulatory Act of Puerto Rico, as amended. OIB offers the Bank certain Puerto Rico tax advantages.
OIB activities are limited under Puerto Rico law to persons and assets/liabilities located outside
of Puerto Rico.
Oriental Financial Services is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the SEC, and the OCFI. Oriental Insurance is
subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of the Commissioner of
Insurance of Puerto Rico.
The Groups mortgage banking activities are conducted through a division of the Bank. The mortgage
banking activities consist of the origination and purchase of residential mortgage loans for the
Groups own portfolio and, if the conditions so warrant, the Group engages in the sale of such
loans to other financial institutions in the secondary market. The Group originates Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) insured and Veterans Administration (VA)-guaranteed mortgages that are
primarily securitized for issuance of Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)
mortgage-backed securities which can be resold to individual or institutional investors in the
secondary market. Conventional loans that meet the underwriting requirements for sale or exchange
under standard Federal National Mortgage Association (the FNMA) or Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (the FHLMC) programs are referred to as conforming mortgage loans and are also
securitized for issuance of FNMA or FHLMC mortgage-backed securities. The Group is an approved
seller of FNMA, as well as FHLMC, mortgage loans for issuance of FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed
securities. The Group is also an approved issuer of GNMA mortgage-backed securities. The Group
outsources the servicing of the GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pools that it issues or originates and of its
mortgage loan portfolio.
7
Table of Contents
Effective April 30, 2010, the Bank assumed all of the retail deposits and other liabilities and
acquired certain assets and substantially all of the operations of Eurobank from the FDIC as
receiver for Eurobank, pursuant to the terms of a purchase and assumption agreement entered into by
the Bank and the FDIC on April 30, 2010. This transaction is referred to as the FDIC-assisted
acquisition.
Pursuant to a waiver granted by the SEC to the Group on May 28, 2010, and in accordance with the
guidance provided in the SEC Staff Accounting Bulleting Topic 1.K, Financial Statements of Acquired
Troubled Financial Institutions (SAB 1:K), the Group has omitted certain financial information of
the FDIC-assisted acquisition otherwise required by Rule 3-05 of Regulation S-X. SAB 1:K provides
relief from the requirements of Rule 3-05 of Regulation S-X under certain circumstances, including
a transaction such as the Eurobank acquisition, in which the registrant engages in an acquisition
of a troubled financial institution for which audited financial statements are not reasonably
available and in which federal assistance is so pervasive as to substantially reduce the relevance
of such information to an assessment of future operations.
Significant Accounting Policies
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Group are prepared in accordance with GAAP
as prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
and with the general practices within the financial services industry. In preparing the
consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. The Group believes that, of its significant accounting policies, the following may
involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.
Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks of the Eurobank FDIC-assisted
transaction acquired loans are significantly different from those loans not covered under the FDIC
loss sharing agreements. Accordingly, the Group presents loans subject to the loss sharing
agreements as covered loans and loans that are not subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreements as
non-covered loans. Non-covered loans include any loans made outside of the FDIC shared-loss
agreements before or after the April 30, 2010 FDIC-assisted acquisition. Non-covered loans also
include credit cards balances acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition.
Non-covered loans
Non-covered loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or
until maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for
charge-offs, the allowance for non-covered loan and lease losses, unamortized discount related to
mortgage servicing right sold and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income
is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees and costs and premiums and
discounts on loans purchased are deferred and amortized over the estimated life of the loans as an
adjustment of their yield through interest income using the interest method. When a loan is paid
off or sold, any unamortized deferred fee (cost) is credited (charged) to income.
Credit cards balances acquired as part of the FDIC-assisted acquisition are to be accounted for under the
guidance of ASC 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loan
payment in excess of the Groups initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income
on a level-yield basis over the life of the loan. Loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 are placed
on non-accrual status when past due in accordance with the Groups non-accruing policy and any
accretion of discount is discontinued. These assets were written-down to their estimated fair value
on their acquisition date, incorporating an estimate of future expected cash flows. To the extent
actual or projected cash flows are less than originally estimated, additional provisions for loan
and lease losses will be recognized.
Interest recognition is discontinued when loans are 90 days or more in arrears on principal and/or
interest based on contractual terms, except for well collateralized residential mortgage loans in
process of collection for which recognition is discontinued when they become 365 days or more past
due based on contractual terms and are then written down, if necessary, based on the specific
evaluation of the collateral underlying the loan. Loans for which the recognition of interest
income has been discontinued are designated as non-accruing. Collections are accounted for on the
cash method thereafter, until qualifying to return to accrual status. Such loans are not reinstated
to accrual status until interest is received on a current basis and other factors indicative of
doubtful collection cease to exist.
8
Table of Contents
The Group follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the
allowance for loan and lease losses to provide for inherent losses in the non-covered loan
portfolio. This methodology includes the consideration of factors such as economic conditions,
portfolio risk characteristics, prior loss experience, and results of periodic credit reviews of
individual loans. The provision for loan and lease losses charged to current operations is based
on such methodology. Loan and lease losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the
allowance for loan and lease losses on non-covered loans.
Larger commercial loans that exhibit potential or observed credit weaknesses are subject to
individual review and grading. Where appropriate, allowances are allocated to individual loans
based on managements estimate of the borrowers ability to repay the loan given the availability
of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal options available to the Group.
Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired. A loan is considered
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Group will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value
of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or as a practical
expedient, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral, if the
loan is collateral dependent. Loans are individually evaluated for impairment, except large
groups of small balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, and
loans that are recorded at fair value or at the lower of cost or fair value. The Group measures
for impairment all commercial loans over $250 thousand and over 90-days past-due. The portfolios
of mortgage, leases and consumer loans are considered homogeneous, and are evaluated collectively
for impairment.
The Group, using a rating system, applies an overall allowance percentage to each non-covered
loan portfolio category based on historical credit losses adjusted for current conditions and
trends. This calculation is the starting point for managements systematic determination of the
required level of the allowance for loan and lease losses. Other data considered in this
determination includes: the credit grading assigned to commercial loans, delinquency levels, loss
trends and other information including underwriting standards and economic trends.
Loan loss ratios and credit risk categories are updated at least quarterly and are applied in the
context of GAAP as prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) and the importance of depository institutions having prudent, conservative,
but not excessive loan allowances that fall within an acceptable range of estimated losses. While
management uses current available information in estimating possible loan and lease losses,
factors beyond the Groups control such as those affecting general economic conditions may
require future changes to the allowance.
Covered loans
Covered loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition are accounted under the provisions of ASC
310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, which are
applicable when (a) the Group acquires loans deemed to be impaired when there is evidence of
credit deterioration and it is probable, at the date of acquisition, that the Group would be
unable to collect all contractually required payments and (b) as a general policy election for
non-impaired loans that the Group acquires.
The acquired covered loans were recorded at their estimated fair value at the time of
acquisition. Fair value of acquired loans is determined using a discounted cash flow model based
on assumptions about the amount and timing of principal and interest payments, estimated
prepayments, estimated default rates, estimated loss severity in the event of defaults, and
current market rates. Estimated credit losses are included in the determination of fair value;
therefore, an allowance for loan and lease losses is not recorded on the acquisition date.
In accordance with ASC 310-30 and in estimating the fair value of covered loans at the
acquisition date, the Group (a) calculated the contractual amount and timing of undiscounted
principal and interest payments (the undiscounted contractual cash flows) and (b) estimated the
amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal and interest payments (the undiscounted
expected cash flows). The difference between the undiscounted contractual cash flows and the
undiscounted expected cash flows is the non-accretable difference. The non-accretable difference
represents an estimate of the loss exposure in the covered loan portfolio, and such amount is
subject to change over time based on the performance of the covered loans. The carrying value of
covered loans is reduced by payments received and increased by the portion of the accretable
yield recognized as interest income.
The excess of undiscounted expected cash flows at acquisition over the initial fair value of
acquired loans is referred to as the accretable yield and is recorded as interest income over
the estimated life of the loans using the effective yield method if the timing and amount of the
future cash flows is reasonably estimable. Subsequent to acquisition, the Group aggregates loans
into
9
Table of Contents
pools of loans with common risk characteristics to account for the acquired loans. Increases in
expected cash flows over those originally estimated increase the accretable yield and are
recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in expected cash flows compared to those
originally estimated decrease the accretable yield and are recognized by recording a provision
for loan and lease losses and establishing an allowance for loan and lease losses.
Loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are generally considered accruing and performing loans as
the loans accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are
reasonably estimable. Accordingly, acquired impaired loans that are contractually past due are
still considered to be accruing and performing loans. If the timing and amount of cash flows is
not reasonably estimable, the loans may be classified as nonaccrual loans and interest income may
be recognized on a cash basis or as a reduction of the principal amount outstanding.
Under the accounting guidance of ASC 310-30 for acquired loans, the allowance for loan and lease
losses on covered loans is measured at each financial reporting period, or measurement date,
based on expected cash flows. Accordingly, decreases in expected cash flows on the acquired
covered loans as of the measurement date compared to those initially estimated are recognized by
recording a provision for credit losses on covered loans. The portion of the loss on covered
loans reimbursable from the FDIC is recorded as an offset to provision for credit losses and
increases the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset.
Financial Instruments
Certain financial instruments, including derivatives, trading securities and investment securities
available-for-sale, are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are recorded in
other comprehensive income or as part of non-interest income, as appropriate. Fair values are based
on listed market prices, if available. If listed market prices are not available, fair value is
determined based on other relevant factors, including price quotations for similar instruments. The
fair values of certain derivative contracts are derived from pricing models that consider current
market and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments as well as time value and
yield curve or volatility factors underlying the positions.
The Group determines the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value
measurement framework, which establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1
measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three
levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 Level 1 asset and liabilities include equity securities that are traded in an active
exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency securities
that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily
available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable
or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for which the
fair value is estimated based on valuations obtained from third-party pricing services for
identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less
frequently than exchange-traded instruments and (iii) derivative contracts and financial
liabilities (e.g. callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes elected for fair value option under
the fair value measurement framework), whose value is determined using a pricing model with
inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities
include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, for which the
determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
10
Table of Contents
Impairment of Investment Securities
The Group conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment in an unrealized loss
position for other-than-temporary impairments. The Group follows ASC 320-10-65-1, which changed the
accounting requirements for other-than-temporary impairments for debt securities, and in certain
circumstances, separates the amount of total impairment into credit and noncredit-related amounts.
The corresponding review takes into consideration current market conditions, issuer rating changes
and trends, the creditworthiness of the obligor of the security, current analysts evaluations,
failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments, the Groups intent to not
sell the security or whether it is more-likely-than-not that the Group will be required to sell the
debt security before its anticipated recovery, as well as other qualitative factors. The term
other-than-temporary impairment is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but
indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value is not favorable, or that there is a
lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the
investment. Any portion of a decline in value associated with credit loss is recognized in income
with the remaining noncredit-related component being recognized in other comprehensive income. A
credit loss is determined by assessing whether the amortized cost basis of the security will be
recovered, by comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security,
discounted at the rate equal to the yield used to accrete current and prospective beneficial
interest for the security. The shortfall of the present value of the cash flows expected to be
collected in relation to the amortized cost basis is considered to be the credit loss.
The Groups review for impairment generally entails:
| intent to sell the debt security; | ||
| if it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt securities before the anticipated recovery; | ||
| identification and evaluation of investments that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment; | ||
| analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period; | ||
| discussion of evidential matter, including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual investments to qualify as having other-than-temporary impairment and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment. |
FDIC Shared-Loss Indemnification Asset
The Group has determined that the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset will be accounted for as an
indemnification asset measured separately from the covered loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted
acquisition as it is not contractually embedded in any of the covered loans. The shared-loss
indemnification asset related to estimated future loan and lease losses is not transferable should
the Group sell a loan prior to foreclosure or maturity. The fair value of the shared-loss
indemnification asset represents the present value of the estimated cash payments expected to be
received from the FDIC for future losses on covered assets, based on the credit adjustment
estimated for each covered asset and the loss sharing percentages. These cash flows are then
discounted at a market-based rate to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss
sharing reimbursements from the FDIC. The amount ultimately collected for this asset is dependent
upon the performance of the underlying covered assets, the passage of time, and claims submitted to
the FDIC. The time value of money incorporated into the present value computation is accreted into
earnings over the shorter of the life of the shared-loss agreements or the holding period of the
covered assets.
The FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset will be reduced as losses are recognized on covered loans
and loss sharing payments are received from the FDIC. Realized credit losses in excess of
acquisition-date estimates will result in an increase in the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset.
Conversely, if realized credit losses are less than acquisition-date estimates, the FDIC shared-loss
indemnification asset will be reduced.
11
Table of Contents
Core Deposit Intangible
Core deposit intangible (CDI) is a measure of the value of checking and savings deposits acquired
in a business combination. The fair value of the CDI stemming from any given business combination
is based on the present value of the expected cost savings attributable to the core deposit
funding, relative to an alternative source of funding. CDI is amortized straight-line over a 10 year period. The
Group evaluates such identifiable intangibles for impairment when an indication of impairment
exists. No impairment charges were required to be recorded in the nine-month period ended September
30, 2010. If an impairment loss is determined to exist in the future, the loss would be reflected
as a non-interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations for the period in which such
impairment is identified.
Foreclosed Real Estate and Other Repossessed Property
Non-covered Foreclosed Real Estate
Foreclosed real estate is initially recorded at the lower of the related loan balance or the fair
value less cost to sell of the real estate at the date of foreclosure. At the time properties are
acquired in full or partial satisfaction of loans, any excess of the loan balance over the
estimated fair value of the property is charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses
on non-covered loans. After foreclosure, these properties are carried at the lower of cost or
fair value less estimated cost to sell, based on recent appraised values or options to purchase
the foreclosed property. Any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value, less
estimated costs to sell, is charged to non-interest expense. The costs and expenses associated to
holding these properties in portfolio are expensed as incurred.
Covered Foreclosed Real Estate and Other Repossessed Property
Covered foreclosed real estate and other repossessed property were initially recorded at their
estimated fair value on the acquisition date based on appraisal value less estimated selling
costs. Any subsequent write downs due to declines in fair value are charged to non-interest
expense with a partially offsetting non-interest income for the loss reimbursement under the FDIC
shared-loss agreement. Any recoveries of previous write downs are credited to non-interest
expense with a corresponding charge to non-interest income for the portion of the recovery that
is due to the FDIC.
Income Taxes
In preparing the unaudited consolidated financial statements, the Group is required to estimate
income taxes. This involves an estimate of current income tax expense together with an assessment
of temporary differences resulting from differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The
determination of current income tax expense involves estimates and assumptions that require the
Group to assume certain positions based on its interpretation of current tax laws and regulations.
Changes in assumptions affecting estimates may be required in the future and estimated tax assets
or liabilities may need to be increased or decreased accordingly. The accrual for tax contingencies
is adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case
law and emerging legislation. When particular matters arise, a number of years may elapse before
such matters are audited and finally resolved. Favorable resolution of such matters could be
recognized as a reduction to the Groups effective tax rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable
settlement of any particular issue could increase the effective tax rate and may require the use of
cash in the year of resolution.
The determination of deferred tax expense or benefit is based on changes in the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities that generate temporary differences. The carrying value of the Groups net
deferred tax assets assumes that the Group will be able to generate sufficient future taxable
income based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and related assumptions change in the
future, the Group may be required to record valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets
resulting in additional income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets on a regular basis and assesses
the need for a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is established when management believes
that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Changes in valuation allowance from period to period are included in the Groups tax provision in
the period of change.
12
Table of Contents
In addition to valuation allowances, the Group establishes accruals for uncertain tax positions
when, despite the belief that the Groups tax return positions are fully supported, the Group
believes that certain positions are likely to be challenged. The uncertain tax positions accruals
are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case
law, and emerging legislation. The Groups uncertain tax positions accruals are reflected as income
tax payable as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities. These accruals are reduced
upon expiration of the statute of limitations.
The Group follows a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The
first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of
available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on
audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation process, if any. The second step is to
measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon
ultimate settlement.
The Groups policy is to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits
within the provision for income taxes on the unaudited consolidated statements of operations.
Equity-Based Compensation Plans
The Groups Amended and Restated 2007 Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan (the Omnibus Plan),
provides for equity-based compensation incentives through the grant of stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted units and dividend equivalents, as well as
equity-based performance awards. The Omnibus Plan was adopted in 2007, amended and restated in
2008, and it was further amended in 2010.
The purpose of the Omnibus Plan is to provide flexibility to the Group to attract, retain and
motivate directors, officers, and key employees through the grant of awards based on performance
and to adjust its compensation practices to the best compensation practice and corporate governance
trends as they develop from time to time. The Omnibus Plan is further intended to motivate high
levels of individual performance coupled with increased shareholder returns. Therefore, awards
under the Omnibus Plan (each, an Award) are intended to be based upon the recipients individual
performance, level of responsibility and potential to make significant contributions to the Group.
Generally, the Omnibus Plan will terminate as of (a) the date when no more of the Groups shares of
common stock are available for issuance under the Omnibus Plan, or, if earlier, (b) the date the
Omnibus Plan is terminated by the Groups Board of Directors.
The Boards Compensation Committee (the Committee), or such other committee as the Board may
designate, has full authority to interpret and administer the Omnibus Plan in order to carry out
its provisions and purposes. The Committee has the authority to determine those persons eligible to
receive an Award and to establish the terms and conditions of any Award. The Committee may
delegate, subject to such terms or conditions or guidelines as it shall determine, to any employee
or group of employees any portion of its authority and powers under the Omnibus Plan with respect
to participants who are not directors or executive officers subject to the reporting requirements
under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Only
the Committee may exercise authority in respect of Awards granted to such participants.
The Omnibus Plan replaced and superseded the Groups 1996, 1998 and 2000 Incentive Stock Option
Plans (the Stock Option Plans). All outstanding stock options under the Stock Option Plans
continue in full force and effect, subject to their original terms and conditions.
The expected term of stock options granted represents the period of time that such options are
expected to be outstanding. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Groups
shares of common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected term of the stock options.
Subsequent Events
The Group has evaluated other events subsequent to the balance sheet date and prior to the filing
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and has adjusted and disclosed those events that have
occurred that would require adjustment or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.
13
Table of Contents
Reclassifications
When necessary, certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the
current year presentation.
Recent Accounting Developments:
Derivatives and Hedging In March 2010, FASB issued a clarification on the scope exception for
embedded credit derivatives. The guidance eliminates the scope exception for bifurcation of
embedded credit derivatives in interests in securitized financial assets, unless they are created
solely by subordination of one financial debt instrument to another. The guidance is effective
beginning in the first reporting period after June 15, 2010, with earlier adoption permitted for
the quarter beginning after March 31, 2010. This clarification did not have a material impact on
the Groups financial position or results of operations.
Loan Modification In April 2010, FASB issued an update affecting accounting for loan
modifications for those loans that are acquired with deteriorated credit quality and are accounted
for on a pool basis. It clarifies that the modifications of such loans do not result in the removal
of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered
a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool
of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The
new guidance is effective prospectively for modifications occurring in the first interim or annual
period ending on or after July 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. The Group adopted this
guidance for loans acquired on the FDIC-assisted acquisition accounted for under ASC 310-30. Its
adoption did not have a material effect on the Groups unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Credit Quality and Allowance for Credit Losses Disclosures In July 2010, FASB issued ASU No.
2010-20, Disclosures about Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses.
The ASU requires a greater level of disaggregated information about the allowance for credit losses
and the credit quality of financing receivables. The period-end balance disclosure requirements for
loans and the allowance for loan and lease losses will be effective for reporting periods ending on
or after December 15, 2010, while disclosures for activity during a reporting period that occurs in
the loan and allowance for loan and lease losses accounts will be effective for reporting periods
beginning on or after December 15, 2010.
Other accounting standards that have been issued by FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not
expected to have a material impact on the Groups financial condition, statement of operations or
cash flows.
NOTE 2 FDIC-ASSISTED ACQUISITION
On April 30, 2010 the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed certain deposits and other
liabilities of Eurobank from the FDIC as receiver of Eurobank, San Juan, Puerto Rico. As part of the
Purchase and Assumption Agreement between the Bank and the FDIC (the Purchase and Assumption
Agreement), the Bank and the FDIC entered into shared-loss agreements (each, a shared-loss
agreement and collectively, the shared-loss agreements), whereby the FDIC will cover a
substantial portion of any future losses on loans (and related unfunded loan commitments),
foreclosed real estate and other repossessed properties.
The acquired loans, foreclosed real estate, and other repossessed property subject to the
shared-loss agreements are collectively referred as covered assets. Under the terms of the
shared-loss agreements, the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and share in 80% of loss recoveries on
covered assets. The term for loss share on single family residential mortgage loans is ten years
with respect to losses and loss recoveries, while the term for loss share on commercial loans is
five years with respect to losses and eight years with respect to loss recoveries, from the April
30, 2010 acquisition date. The shared-loss agreements also provide for certain costs directly
related to the collection and preservation of covered assets to be reimbursed at an 80% level.
The operating results of the Group for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 include
the operating results produced by the acquired assets and liabilities assumed for the period of May
1, 2010 to September 30, 2010. The Group believes that given the nature of assets and liabilities
assumed, the significant amount of fair value adjustments, the nature of additional consideration
provided to the FDIC and the FDIC shared-loss agreements now in place, historical results of
Eurobank are not meaningful to the Groups results, and thus no pro-forma information is
presented.
14
Table of Contents
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of April 30, 2010 were presented at their fair
value. In many cases, the determination of these fair values required management to make estimates
about discount rates, expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are
highly subjective in nature and subject to change. The fair values initially assigned to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed were preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year
after the closing date of the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values
became available. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Group recorded preliminary
measurement period adjustments to the carrying value of loans, FDIC shared-loss indemnification
asset, and deferred income tax liability. This was the result of additional analysis on the
estimates of fair value, and the Groups decision to account for all loans acquired in the
FDIC-assisted acquisition, except for credit cards balances, in accordance with ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt
Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. The Bank and the FDIC are engaged in ongoing
discussions that may impact certain assets acquired or certain liabilities assumed by the Bank. The
amount that the Group realizes on these assets could differ materially from the carrying value
included in the unaudited consolidated statements of financial condition primarily as a result of
changes in the timing and amount of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. Because of
the shared-loss agreements with the FDIC on the covered assets, the Group does not expect to incur
significant losses.
Preliminary net-assets acquired and the respective preliminary measurement period adjustments are
reflected in the table below:
April 30, 2010 | Preliminary | |||||||||||||||||||
Book value April | Fair Value | (As initially | Measurement | April 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
30, 2010 | Adjustments | reported) | Period Adjustments | (As remeasured) | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 89,777 | $ | | $ | 89,777 | $ | | $ | 89,777 | ||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
10,077 | | 10,077 | | 10,077 | |||||||||||||||
Loans covered by shared-loss agreements |
1,536,416 | (699,910 | ) | 836,506 | (49,328 | ) | 787,178 | |||||||||||||
Loans not covered by share-loss agreements |
4,275 | (1,298 | ) | 2,977 | (9 | ) | 2,986 | |||||||||||||
Foreclosed real estate covered by shared-loss agreements |
26,082 | (8,555 | ) | 17,527 | | 17,527 | ||||||||||||||
Other repossessed properties covered by shared-loss agreements |
3,401 | (339 | ) | 3,062 | | 3,062 | ||||||||||||||
FDIC loss-share indemnification asset |
| 516,250 | 516,250 | 42,800 | 559,050 | |||||||||||||||
Core deposit intangible |
| 1,423 | 1,423 | | 1,423 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
20,168 | (14,867 | ) | 5,301 | | 5,301 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets acquired |
$ | 1,690,196 | $ | (207,296 | ) | $ | 1,482,900 | $ | (6,519 | ) | $ | 1,476,381 | ||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 722,442 | $ | 7,104 | $ | 729,546 | $ | | $ | 729,546 | ||||||||||
Deferred income tax liability, net |
| | 6,419 | (2,543 | ) | 3,876 | ||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
9,426 | | 9,426 | | 9,426 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities assumed |
$ | 731,868 | $ | 7,104 | $ | 745,391 | $ | (2,543 | ) | $ | 742,848 | |||||||||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 958,328 | $ | (214,400 | ) | $ | 737,509 | $ | (3,976 | ) | $ | 733,533 | ||||||||
Consideration |
||||||||||||||||||||
Note payable issued to the FDIC |
$ | 715,536 | $ | 434 | $ | 715,970 | $ | | $ | 715,970 | ||||||||||
Net settlement payable to the FDIC |
15,244 | (4,654 | ) | 10,590 | | 10,590 | ||||||||||||||
Equity appreciation instrument |
| 909 | 909 | | 909 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 730,780 | $ | (3,311 | ) | $ | 727,469 | $ | | $ | 727,469 | ||||||||||
Net after tax bargain purchase gain from the FDIC-assisted
acquisition |
$ | 10,040 | $ | (3,976 | ) | $ | 6,064 | |||||||||||||
15
Table of Contents
The preliminary measurement period adjustments affected the following items presented in the
June 30, 2010 unaudited consolidated financial statements:
Net Income for the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2010 (As initially reported) |
$ | 29,285 | ||
Preliminary Measurement Period Adjustments: |
||||
Interest income from covered loans accretable discount |
(1,711 | ) | ||
Bargain purchase from FDIC-assisted acquisition |
(6,519 | ) | ||
Accretion of FDIC loss-share indemnification asset |
114 | |||
Income tax provision |
710 | |||
Total Preliminary Measurement Period Adjustments |
(7,406 | ) | ||
Net Income for the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2010 (As re-measured) |
$ | 21,879 | ||
(As initially | ||||||||
reported) | (As re-measured) | |||||||
Earnings per share (for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010): |
||||||||
Basic |
0.79 | 0.15 | ||||||
Diluted |
0.79 | 0.15 | ||||||
Total Stockholders Equity at June 30, 2010 |
$ | 746,042 | $ | 738,636 |
Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date reflecting
assumptions that a market participant would use when pricing an asset or liability. In some cases,
the estimation of fair values requires management to make estimates about discount rates, future
expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are highly subjective in nature
and subject to change. The methods used to determine the fair values of the significant assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are described below.
Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, and
interest-earning deposits with banks and the Federal Reserve Bank. Cash and cash equivalents have
a maturity of 90 days or less at the time of purchase. The fair value of financial instruments
that are short-term or re-price frequently and that have little or no risk were considered to
have a fair value that approximates to carrying value.
Federal Home Loan Bank stock The fair value of acquired FHLB stock was estimated to be its
redemption value. Subsequent to April 30, 2010 the FHLB stock was redeemed at its carrying
amount.
Loans - Loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition, excluding extensions of credit pursuant
to a credit card plan, are referred as covered loans as the Bank will be reimbursed by the FDIC
for a substantial portion of any future credit losses on them under the terms of the shared-loss
agreements. At the April 30, 2010 acquisition date, the estimated fair value of the FDIC-assisted
acquisition loan portfolio was $790.2 million. Loans fair values were estimated by discounting
the expected cash flows from the portfolio. In estimating such fair value and expected cash
flows, management made several assumptions regarding prepayments, collateral cash flows, the
timing of defaults, and the loss severity of defaults. Other factors expected by market
participants were considered in determining the fair value of acquired loans, including loan pool
level estimated cash flows, type of loan and related collateral, risk classification status (i.e.
performing or nonperforming), fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not
the loan was amortizing and current discount rates.
The methods used to estimate fair value are extremely sensitive to the assumptions and estimates
used. While management attempted to use assumptions and estimates that best reflected the
acquired loan portfolios and current market conditions, a greater
degree of subjectivity is inherent in these values than in those determined in active markets.
Accordingly, readers are cautioned in using this information for purposes of evaluating the
financial condition and/or value of the Group in and of itself or in comparison with any other
company.
16
Table of Contents
Foreclosed real estate and other repossessed properties Foreclosed real estate and other
repossessed properties (primarily vehicles) are presented at their estimated fair value and are
also subject to the FDIC shared-loss agreements. The fair values were determined using expected
selling price, less selling and carrying costs, discounted to present value.
FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset The FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset, also known as
the indemnification asset, is measured separately from each of the covered asset categories as it
is not contractually embedded in any of the covered asset categories. The $559.1 million fair
value of the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset represents the present value of the estimated
cash payments (net of amount owed to the FDIC) expected to be received from the FDIC for future
losses on covered assets based on the credit assumptions on estimated cash flows for each covered
asset pool and the loss sharing percentages. The ultimate collectability of the FDIC shared-loss
indemnification asset is dependent upon the performance of the underlying covered loans, the
passage of time and claims paid by the FDIC which are impacted by the Banks adherence to certain
guidelines established by the FDIC.
Core deposit intangible (CDI) CDI is a measure of the value of non-interest checking,
savings, and NOW and money market deposits that are acquired in business combinations. The fair
value of the CDI stemming from any given business combination was based on the present value of
the expected cost savings attributable to the core deposit funding, relative to an alternative
source of funding.
Deposit liabilities The fair values used for demand and savings deposits are, by definition,
equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair values for time deposits
were estimated using a discounted cash flow method that applies interest rates currently being
offered on time deposits to a schedule of aggregated contractual maturities of such time
deposits.
Deferred taxes Deferred income taxes relate to the differences between the financial statement
and tax bases of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in this transaction. The Groups
effective tax rate used in measuring deferred taxes resulting from the FDIC-assisted acquisition
is 39%.
Other assets and other liabilities Given the short-term nature of these financial instruments
the carrying amounts reflected in the statement of assets acquired and liabilities assumed
approximated fair value.
NOTE 3 INVESTMENTS
Money Market Investments
The Group considers as cash equivalents all money market instruments that are not pledged and that
have maturities of three months of less at the date of acquisition. At September 30, 2010, and
December 31, 2009, cash equivalents included as part of cash and due from banks amounted to $53.2
million and $29.4 million, respectively.
17
Table of Contents
Investment Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value, and weighted average yield of
the securities owned by the Group at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, were as follows:
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Average | ||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Yield | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
$ | 301,565 | $ | | $ | 15 | $ | 301,550 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
71,318 | 89 | 3,002 | 68,405 | 5.37 | % | ||||||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,724 | | 19,281 | 42,443 | 3.77 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
434,607 | 89 | 22,298 | 412,398 | ||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
3,469,102 | 41,989 | 1,965 | 3,509,126 | 4.06 | % | ||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
128,951 | 8,939 | | 137,890 | 5.05 | % | ||||||||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
185,641 | 8,793 | 6 | 194,428 | 5.03 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
85,754 | | 22,508 | 63,246 | 4.87 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed-securities and CMOs |
3,869,448 | 59,721 | 24,479 | 3,904,690 | ||||||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 4,304,055 | $ | 59,810 | $ | 46,777 | $ | 4,317,088 | 3.89 | % | ||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Average | ||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Yield | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
$ | 1,037,722 | $ | 359 | $ | 30,990 | $ | 1,007,091 | 3.18 | % | ||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
71,537 | 9 | 6,181 | 65,365 | 5.37 | % | ||||||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,722 | | 23,340 | 38,382 | 3.69 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
1,170,981 | 368 | 60,511 | 1,110,838 | ||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
2,766,317 | 22,154 | 24,298 | 2,764,173 | 4.62 | % | ||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
339,830 | 7,317 | 1,044 | 346,103 | 4.81 | % | ||||||||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
279,454 | 7,057 | 3 | 286,508 | 5.20 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
487,435 | | 41,398 | 446,037 | 5.78 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed-securities and CMOs |
3,873,036 | 36,528 | 66,743 | 3,842,821 | ||||||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 5,044,017 | $ | 36,896 | $ | 127,254 | $ | 4,953,659 | 4.48 | % | ||||||||||
As of September 30, 2010, the Groups investment securities portfolio included $301.6 million
of obligations of US Government sponsored agencies in the form of discount notes. These securities
were all used as collateral for repurchase agreements, and had a remaining maturity of less than
three months. In October 2010, such securities were sold at a minimum gain of less than $1
thousand and the proceeds reinvested in US agency mortgage-backed securities with a coupon of
4.50%, and an estimated yield of 4.04%.
18
Table of Contents
The amortized cost and fair value of the Groups investment securities at September 30, 2010, by
contractual maturity, are shown in the next table. Securities not due on a single contractual
maturity date, such as collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final
contractual maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers
may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Available-for-sale | ||||||||
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||
Due less than 1 year |
||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
$ | 301,476 | $ | 301,460 | ||||
Due from 1 to 5 years |
||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency
obligations |
382 | 388 | ||||||
Due after 5 to 10 years |
||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
89 | 89 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency
obligations |
13,662 | 12,669 | ||||||
Structured credit investments |
11,976 | 8,344 | ||||||
Total due after 5 to 10 years |
25,727 | 21,102 | ||||||
Due after 10 years |
||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
57,274 | 55,349 | ||||||
Structured credit investments |
49,748 | 34,099 | ||||||
Total due after 10 years |
107,022 | 89,448 | ||||||
Total investment securities |
434,607 | 412,398 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
||||||||
Due after 5 to 10 years |
||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
14,998 | 15,781 | ||||||
Due after 10 years |
||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
185,641 | 194,427 | ||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
3,454,104 | 3,493,346 | ||||||
GNMA certificates |
128,951 | 137,890 | ||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
85,754 | 63,246 | ||||||
Total due after 10 years |
3,854,450 | 3,888,909 | ||||||
Total
mortgage-backed securities |
3,869,448 | 3,904,690 | ||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 4,304,055 | $ | 4,317,088 | ||||
Keeping with the Groups investment strategy, during the nine-month periods ended September
30, 2010 and 2009, there were certain sales of available-for sale securities because the Group felt
at the time of such sales that gains could be realized while at the same time having good
opportunities to invest the proceeds in other investment securities with attractive yields and
terms that would allow the Group to continue to protect its net interest margin. Also, the Group,
as part of its asset and liability management, purchases agency discount notes close to their
maturities as a short term vehicle to reinvest the proceeds of sale transactions until similar
investment securities with attractive yields can be purchased. The discount notes are pledged as
collateral for repurchase agreements. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, the
Group sold $282.5 million of discount notes with minimal aggregate gross gains amounting to $1
thousand and sold $387.9 million of discounted notes with minimal aggregate gross losses amounting
to $1 thousand.
19
Table of Contents
In December 2009, the Group made the strategic decision to sell $116.0 million of collateralized
debt obligations at a loss of $73.9 million. For the same strategic reasons, in early January 2010,
the Group sold $374.3 million of non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations with a loss of
$45.8 million. This loss was accounted for as other-than-temporary impairment in the fourth quarter
of 2009 and no additional gain or loss was realized on the sale in January 2010, since these assets
were sold at the same value reflected at December 31, 2009.
The tables below present an analysis of the gross realized gains and losses by category for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Face Value | Cost | Sale Price | Sale Book Value | Gross Gains | Gross Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of Securities Available-for-Sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
agencies |
$ | 945,425 | $ | 968,451 | $ | 972,642 | $ | 967,926 | $ | 4,716 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
945,425 | 968,451 | 972,642 | 967,926 | 4,716 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and CMOs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
2,070,159 | 1,940,384 | 1,783,631 | 1,755,808 | 27,823 | | ||||||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
259,386 | 267,147 | 245,254 | 239,985 | 5,269 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
626,619 | 623,695 | 368,216 | 368,216 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities and CMOs |
2,956,164 | 2,831,226 | 2,397,101 | 2,364,009 | 33,092 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,901,589 | $ | 3,799,677 | $ | 3,369,743 | $ | 3,331,935 | $ | 37,808 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||||
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Face Value | Cost | Sale Price | Sale Book Value | Gross Gains | Gross Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of Securities Available-for-Sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
agencies |
$ | 2,237,785 | $ | 2,238,556 | $ | 2,237,600 | $ | 2,237,414 | $ | 203 | $ | 17 | ||||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
90,000 | 90,612 | 90,000 | 90,000 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
2,327,785 | 2,329,168 | 2,327,600 | 2,327,414 | 203 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and CMOs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
3,910,151 | 3,808,523 | 3,500,406 | 3,450,661 | 50,894 | 1,150 | ||||||||||||||||||
CMOs issued by U.S. Government sponsored
agencies |
330,000 | 330,938 | 336,993 | 330,584 | 6,410 | | ||||||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
112,406 | 113,157 | 113,155 | 113,107 | 48 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities and CMOs |
4,352,557 | 4,252,618 | 3,950,554 | 3,894,352 | 57,352 | 1,150 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,680,342 | $ | 6,581,786 | $ | 6,278,154 | $ | 6,221,766 | $ | 57,555 | $ | 1,167 | ||||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
The following table shows the Groups gross unrealized losses and fair value of investment
securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009:
September 30, 2010
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Less than 12 months | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
$ | 311,297 | $ | 1,965 | $ | 309,332 | ||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
301,476 | 15 | 301,461 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
2,588 | 6 | 2,582 | |||||||||
615,361 | 1,986 | 613,375 | ||||||||||
12 months or more | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
85,754 | 22,508 | 63,246 | |||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,723 | 19,281 | 42,442 | |||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
50,964 | 3,002 | 47,962 | |||||||||
198,441 | 44,791 | 153,650 | ||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
311,297 | 1,965 | 309,332 | |||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
301,476 | 15 | 301,461 | |||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
85,754 | 22,508 | 63,246 | |||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,723 | 19,281 | 42,442 | |||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
50,964 | 3,002 | 47,962 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
2,588 | 6 | 2,582 | |||||||||
$ | 813,802 | $ | 46,777 | $ | 767,025 | |||||||
21
Table of Contents
December 31, 2009
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Less than 12 months | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
$ | 1,772,575 | $ | 24,287 | $ | 1,748,288 | ||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
602,926 | 30,990 | 571,936 | |||||||||
GNMA certificates |
154,916 | 1,030 | 153,886 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
2,701 | 3 | 2,698 | |||||||||
2,533,118 | 56,310 | 2,476,808 | ||||||||||
12 months or more | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
605 | 11 | 594 | |||||||||
GNMA certificates |
350 | 14 | 336 | |||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
113,122 | 41,398 | 71,724 | |||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
71,155 | 6,181 | 64,974 | |||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,722 | 23,340 | 38,382 | |||||||||
246,954 | 70,944 | 176,010 | ||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
1,773,180 | 24,298 | 1,748,882 | |||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
602,926 | 30,990 | 571,936 | |||||||||
GNMA certificates |
155,266 | 1,044 | 154,222 | |||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
113,122 | 41,398 | 71,724 | |||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
71,155 | 6,181 | 64,974 | |||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,722 | 23,340 | 38,382 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
2,701 | 3 | 2,698 | |||||||||
$ | 2,780,072 | $ | 127,254 | $ | 2,652,818 | |||||||
The Group conducts quarterly reviews to identify and evaluate each investment in an unrealized
loss position for other-than-temporary impairments. On April 1, 2009, the Group adopted FASB
Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 320-10-65-1, which changed the accounting requirements for
other than temporary impairments for debt securities, and in certain circumstances, separates the
amount of total impairment into credit and noncredit-related amounts.
ASC 320-10-5-1 requires the Group to consider various factors during its review, which include, but
are not limited to:
| analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period; | ||
| the financial condition of the issuer or issuers; | ||
| the creditworthiness of the obligor of the security; | ||
| actual collateral attributes; | ||
| any rating changes by a rating agency; | ||
| the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments; | ||
| current market conditions | ||
| adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a geographic area; | ||
| the Groups intent to sell the debt security; | ||
| whether it is more-likely-than-not that the Group will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery; | ||
| and other qualitative factors that could support or not an other-than-temporary impairment. |
22
Table of Contents
Any portion of a decline in value associated with credit loss is recognized in income with the
remaining noncredit-related component being recognized in other comprehensive income. A credit
loss is determined by assessing whether the amortized cost basis of the security will be recovered,
by comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security, discounted
at the rate equal to the yield used to accrete current and prospective beneficial interest for the
security. The shortfall of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected in
relation to the amortized cost basis is considered to be the credit loss.
Other-than-temporary impairment analysis is based on estimates that depend on market conditions and
are subject to further change over time. In addition, while the Group believes that the methodology
used to value these exposures is reasonable, the methodology is subject to continuing refinement,
including those made as a result of market developments. Consequently, it is reasonably possible
that changes in estimates or conditions could result in the need to recognize additional
other-than-temporary impairment charges in the future.
With regards to the structured credit investments and non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations with an unrealized loss position, the Group performs a more detailed analysis of
other-than-temporary impairments, which is explained in more detail in the following paragraphs.
Other securities in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2010 are mainly composed of
securities issued or backed by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored agencies.
These investments are primarily highly liquid securities that have a large and efficient secondary
market. Valuations are performed on a monthly basis. The Groups management believes that the
unrealized losses of such other securities at September 30, 2010, are temporary and are
substantially related to market interest rate fluctuations and not to deterioration in the
creditworthiness of the issuer or guarantor. At September 30, 2010, the Group does not have the
intent to sell these investments in unrealized loss position.
The determination of the credit loss assumption in the discounted cash flow analysis related to the
Groups structured credit investments is similar to the one used for the non-agency collateralized
mortgage obligations, the difference being that the underlying data for each type of security is
different, which affects the cash flow calculations. In the case of the CLOs, the determination of
the future cash flows is based on the following factors:
| Identification of the estimated fair value of the contractual coupon of the loans underlying the CLO. This information is obtained directly from the trustees reports for each CLO security. | ||
| Calculation of the yield-to-maturity for each loan in the CLO, and determination of the interest rate spread (yield less the risk-free rate). | ||
| Estimated default probabilities for each loan in the CLO. These are based on the credit ratings for each company in the structure, and this information also is obtained directly from the trustees reports for each CLO security. The default probabilities are adjusted based on the credit rating assuming the highest default probabilities for the loans of those entities with the lowest credit ratings. In addition to determining the current default probabilities, estimates are developed to calculate the cumulative default probabilities in successive years. To establish the reasonability of the default estimates, market-implied default rates are compared to historical credit ratings-based default rates. | ||
| Once the default probabilities are estimated, the average numbers of defaults is calculated for the loans underlying each CLO security. In those cases where defaults are deemed to occur, a recovery rate is applied to the cash flow determination at the time in which the default is expected to occur. The recovery rate is based on average historical information for similar securities, as well as the actual recovery rates for defaults that have occurred within the pool of loans underlying the securities owned by the Group. | ||
| One hundred simulations are carried out and run through a cash flow engine for the underlying pool of loans in each CLO security. Each one of the simulations uses different default estimates and forward yield curve assumptions. |
At September 30, 2010, the Groups portfolio of structured credit investments amounted to $61.7
million (amortized cost) in the available-for-sale portfolio, with net unrealized losses of
approximately $19.3 million. The Groups structured credit investments portfolio consist of two
types of instruments: synthetic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and collateralized loan
obligations (CLOs).
The CLOs are collateralized mostly by senior secured (via first liens) middle market commercial
and industrial loans, which are securitized in the form of obligations. The Group invested in three
of such instruments in 2007, and as of September 30, 2010, have an aggregate amortized cost of
$36.2 million and unrealized losses of $10.9 million. These investments are all floating rate
notes, which reset quarterly based on the three-month LIBOR rate.
23
Table of Contents
The Group estimates that it will recover all interest and principal for the Groups specific
tranches of these securities. This assessment is based on the cash flow analysis mentioned above in
which the credit quality of the Groups positions was evaluated through a determination of the
expected losses on the underlying collateral. The model results show that the estimated future
collateral losses, if any, are lower than the Groups subordination levels for each one of these
securities. Therefore, these securities are deemed to have sufficient credit support to absorb the
estimated collateral losses.
The Group owns a corporate bond that is partially invested in a synthetic CDO with an amortized
cost of $25.5 million and unrealized losses of $8.4 million as of September 30, 2010. Due to the
nature of this corporate bond, the Groups analysis focuses primarily on the CDO. The basis for the
determination of other-than-temporary impairments on this security consists on a series of analyses
that include: the ongoing review of the level of subordination (attachment and detachment) that the
structure maintains at each quarter end to determine the level of protection that remains after
events of default may affect any of the entities in the CDOs reference portfolio; simulations
performed on such reference portfolio to determine the probability of default by any of the
remaining entities; the review of the credit default spreads for each entity in the reference
portfolio to monitor their specific performance; and the constant monitoring of the CDOs credit
rating.
As a result of the aforementioned analysis, the Group estimates that it will recover all interest
and principal invested in the bond. This is based on the results of the analysis mentioned above
which show that the subordination level (attachment/detachment) available under the structure of
the CDO is sufficient to allow the Group to recover the value of its investment.
The credit loss assumptions used by the Group in its discounted cash flow analysis for non-agency
collateralized mortgage obligations are based on a model developed by a third party that uses
individual loan-level inputs. The Group analyzes the underlying loan data based on the securitys
structure and based on the following factors to determine the expected cash flows that the security
will receive from the underlying pool of loans: loan stages and transitions; prepayment modeling;
and severity modeling.
Residential mortgage loans are identified by transition stages that are based on the delinquency
status of each loan, and for modeling purposes, roll rates are used in the model to estimate the
transition of such loans from one stage to another as part of a loan default modeling process.
Loan transition estimates are based on several drivers that include, to the extent available, the
following: property type; product type; occupancy; loan purpose; loan documentation; lien type;
time to payment shock (which primarily applies to adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs)); effective loan
to value ratio (LTV); change of monthly LTV; credit scores of borrowers; debt to income ratio;
mortgage rate; initial interest rate spread; loan age; delinquent history; and macroeconomic
factors.
Prepayment estimates are applied also on a loan-level basis. The main factor of prepayment
modeling is refinancing behavior, which is tied to market interest rates. In addition to market
rates and how these affect prepayment modeling, prepayment estimates are calculated based on
additional drivers that include the following: housing turnover; refinancing purpose; cash-out
purpose; consideration of full pay-offs, partial prepayments and curtailments; and seasonality.
In addition to being able to forecast the rate of default on residential mortgage loans,
particularly subprime loans, the model also includes projections of the realized loss amount on
the loans that do default. Such loss severity projections are based on the following drivers:
property values, which are affected by its location; property type; occupancy type, which relates
to whether the properties are for investment purposes, owner-occupied (primary residence) or second
homes; and delinquency status at time of liquidation.
24
Table of Contents
The Group constantly monitors the non-agency mortgage-backed security to measure the
collateral performance and gauge trends for such positions, and the effect of collateral behavior
on credit enhancements, cash flows, and fair values of the bonds. The Group also periodically
monitors any rating migration, and takes into account the time lag between underlying performance
and rating agency actions.
The factors listed above are used to determine the securitys future expected cash flows. These
future cash flows are then discounted based on the instruments book yield to arrive at their
present value. The present value is then compared to the amortized cost of the security, and any
shortfall in the present value is considered to be the credit loss, which is recognized in
earnings.
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities in an unrealized loss position consist of only one security,
with an amortized cost of $85.8 million and unrealized losses of $22.5 million as of September 30,
2010. The following table summarizes other-than-temporary impairment losses (in thousands) on this
security for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010:
Nine-Month | ||||||||
Quarter Ended | Period Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||
Total loss other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
$ | (14,739 | ) | $ | (39,674 | ) | ||
Portion of loss on securities recognized in other comprehensive income |
| 22,508 | ||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
$ | (14,739 | ) | $ | (17,166 | ) | ||
The Group does not intend to sell this security, and it is more likely than not, that it will
not be required to sell this security prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis less any
current period credit losses.
The following table presents a summary of credit-related impairment losses recognized in earnings
(in thousands) on the aforementioned security:
Credit-related impairment losses recognized in earnings in:
2008 |
$ | 21,080 | ||
2009 |
4,309 | |||
2010 |
17,166 | |||
Total credit related impairment losses recognized in earnings up to September 30, 2010 |
$ | 42,555 | ||
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Group revised the assumption related to
home-price appreciation values used in the cash flow analysis of its non-agency mortgage-backed
security. Such cash flow analysis is used to determine the expected losses on the underlying
collateral. The revision provided the Group with more detailed information on the real estate
values of the securitys underlying collateral, which had the effect of increasing the severity of
the losses projected by the cash flow analysis. This is the main reason for the increase in the
credit-related impairment losses recognized in earnings during the quarter ended September 30,
2010, as compared to prior periods.
Based on the aforementioned analysis, during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, net
credit-related impairment losses of $17.2 million were recognized in earnings and $22.5 million of
noncredit-related impairment losses were recognized in other comprehensive income for a non-agency
collateralized mortgage obligation pool not expected to be sold. Major inputs to measure the amount
related to the credit losses were 8.15% of default rate, 63.3% of severity, and 4.05% for
prepayment rate.
25
Table of Contents
NOTE 4 PLEDGED ASSETS
At September 30, 2010, residential mortgage loans amounting to $517.7 million were pledged to
secure advances and borrowings from the FHLB. Investment securities with fair values totaling $3.9
billion, $75.8 million and $50.8 million at September 30, 2010, were pledged to secure securities
sold under agreements to repurchase, public fund deposits and the Puerto Rico Money Market Fund,
respectively. Also, at September 30, 2010, investment securities with fair values totaling $20.4
million were pledged against interest rate swaps contracts, while others with fair values of $124
thousand were pledged as a bond for Trust operations to the OCFI. At December 31, 2009, residential
mortgage loans amounting to $546.7 million were pledged to secure advances and borrowings from the
FHLB. Investment securities with fair values totaling $3.9 billion, $72.6 million and $85.3 million
at December 31, 2009, were pledged to secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase, public
fund deposits and other funds, respectively. Also, at December 31, 2009, investment securities with
fair values totaling $8.4 million were pledged against interest rate swaps contracts, while others
with fair value of $128 thousand and $119 thousand, were pledged to the Puerto Rico Treasury
Department and as a bond for Trust operations to the OCFI, respectively.
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, investment securities available-for-sale not
pledged amounted to $555.9 million and $887.1 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, mortgage loans not pledged amounted to $397.2 million and $396.2 million,
respectively.
NOTE 5
LOANS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
Loans Receivable Composition
The composition of the Groups loan portfolio at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as
follows:
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Loans not-covered under shared loss agreements with FDIC: |
||||||||
Loans secured by real estate: |
||||||||
Residential - 1 to 4 family |
$ | 861,464 | $ | 898,790 | ||||
Home equity loans, secured personal loans and others |
25,787 | 20,145 | ||||||
Commercial |
163,565 | 157,631 | ||||||
Deferred loan fees, net |
(3,815 | ) | (3,318 | ) | ||||
1,047,001 | 1,073,248 | |||||||
Other loans: |
||||||||
Commercial |
53,715 | 40,146 | ||||||
Personal consumer loans and credit lines |
30,757 | 22,864 | ||||||
Leasing |
5,926 | | ||||||
Deferred loan fees, net |
(421 | ) | (178 | ) | ||||
89,977 | 62,832 | |||||||
Loans receivable |
1,136,978 | 1,136,080 | ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
(29,640 | ) | (23,272 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net |
1,107,338 | 1,112,808 | ||||||
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
31,432 | 27,261 | ||||||
Total loans not-covered under shared loss agreements with FDIC, net |
1,138,770 | 1,140,069 | ||||||
Loans covered under shared loss agreements with FDIC: |
||||||||
Loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties |
175,125 | | ||||||
Construction and development secured by 1-4 family residential properties |
18,165 | | ||||||
Commercial and other construction |
414,661 | | ||||||
Leasing |
95,207 | | ||||||
Consumer |
19,700 | | ||||||
Total loans covered under shared loss agreements with FDIC |
722,858 | | ||||||
Total loans, net |
$ | 1,861,628 | $ | 1,140,069 | ||||
26
Table of Contents
Non-covered Loans
The Groups credit activities are mainly with customers located in Puerto Rico. The Groups loan
transactions are encompassed within four main categories: mortgage, commercial, consumer and
leases. The latter business was added to the Groups credit activities as a result of the recent
FDIC-assisted acquisition.
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Group had $59.6 million and $57.1 million,
respectively, of non-accrual non-covered loans including credit cards accounted under ASC 310-20.
Covered loans are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method under
the ASC 310-30, as furthered discussed in Note 2, FDIC-assisted acquisition.
The following table presents information regarding the Groups non-performing loans at September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-performing loans: |
||||||||
Residential Mortgage |
$ | 96,286 | $ | 88,238 | ||||
Commercial |
13,862 | 15,688 | ||||||
Consumer |
604 | 445 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 110,752 | $ | 104,371 | ||||
In accordance with GAAP, the Group is required to account for certain loan modifications or
restructurings as troubled debt restructurings. In general, a modification or restructuring of a
loan constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the Group grants a concession to a borrower
experiencing financial difficulty. Loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are placed on
non-accrual status until the Group determines that future collection of principal and interest is
reasonably assured. Loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring totaled $32.9 million at
September 30, 2010 ($10.7 million December 31, 2009).
Loans Acquired in the FDIC-Assisted Acquisition
Loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition, except for credit cards, are accounted for by the
Group in accordance with ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit
Quality. Under ASC 310-30, these loans were aggregated into pools based on similar
characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest
rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans which are accounted for under
ASC 310-30 by the Group are not reported as non-performing and will continue to have an accretable
yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows
expected to be collected.
The accretable yield on loans represents the amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows
exceed the estimated fair value. The fair values initially assigned to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed were preliminary and are subject to refinement for up to one year after the
closing date of the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values becomes
available. At April 30, 2010, the accretable yield initially reported was $198.5 million. After
preliminary measurement period adjustments such accretable yield was approximately $201.3 million,
which is expected to amortize as interest income over the life of the
loans. The undiscounted contractual cash flows for the loans under ASC
310-30 are $1.775 billion. The undiscounted estimated cash flows
expected to be collected for loans under ASC 310-30 are $988.5
million. The non-accretable discount on loans under ASC 310-30
amounted to $786.2 million.
The following summarizes the accretable yield from the loans acquired during the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2010:
Nine-Month Period | ||||
Ended | ||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Accretable yield at beginning of period |
$ | | ||
Accretable yield determined at date of FDIC assisted acquisition, as initially reported |
198,450 | |||
Preliminary measurement period adjustment |
2,827 | |||
Accretable yield amortized to interest income: |
||||
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010 |
(11,704 | ) | ||
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010 |
(16,746 | ) | ||
Accretable yield at end of period |
$ | 172,827 | ||
27
Table of Contents
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Non-Covered Loans
The Group maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that management considers
adequate to provide for probable losses based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks. The
Groups allowance for loan and lease losses policy provides for a detailed quarterly analysis of
probable losses. The analysis includes a review of historical loan loss experience, value of
underlying collateral, current economic conditions, financial condition of borrowers and other
pertinent factors. While management uses available information in estimating probable loan and
lease losses, future additions to the allowance may be required based on factors beyond the Groups
control.
The changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the quarters and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
Quarter Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 28,002 | $ | 16,718 | $ | 23,272 | $ | 14,293 | ||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
4,100 | 4,400 | 12,214 | 11,250 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(2,517 | ) | (1,037 | ) | (6,124 | ) | (5,652 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries |
55 | 95 | 278 | 285 | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 29,640 | $ | 20,176 | $ | 29,640 | $ | 20,176 | ||||||||
The Group evaluates all loans, some individually and others as homogeneous groups, for
purposes of determining impairment. The Groups recorded investment in commercial and mortgage
loans that were individually evaluated for impairment, excluding FDIC covered loans, and the
related allowance for loan and lease losses as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as
follows:
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Specific | Recorded | Specific | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investment | Allowance | Coverage | Investment | Allowance | Coverage | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans with specific allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 10,769 | $ | 524 | 5 | % | $ | 9,355 | $ | 709 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage |
27,934 | 1,990 | 7 | % | 10,717 | 684 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans with no specific allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
13,997 | | 0 | % | 6,227 | | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total investment in impaired loans |
$ | 52,700 | $ | 2,514 | 5 | % | $ | 26,299 | $ | 1,393 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
The impaired commercial loans were measured based on the fair value of collateral. Impairment
on mortgage loans assessed as troubled debt restructuring was measured using the present value of
cash flows.
28
Table of Contents
Covered Loans under ASC 310-30
The covered loans were recognized at fair value as of April 30, 2010, which included the impact of
expected credit losses and therefore, no allowance for credit losses was recorded at the
acquisition date. To the extent credit deterioration occurs after the date of acquisition, the
Group would record an allowance for loan and lease losses. Also, the Group would record an increase
in the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset for the expected reimbursement from the FDIC under the
shared-loss agreements, which will partially offset the provision. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, there have been deviations between actual and
expected cash flows in several pools of loans acquired under the FDIC-assisted acquisition. These
deviations are both positive and negative in nature. The Group continues to monitor these
deviations at the pool level consistent with relevant accounting literature to assess whether these
deviations are due to differences in time lags of collections or due to credit issues of the loans
comprising the pools. At September 30, 2010 the Group concluded that the deviations between actual
and expected cash flows arise from insignificant timing differences in time lags of collections and therefore no change
to the original assumptions used at the acquisition date to determine the expected cash flows were
required. In the event that positive trends on certain portfolios continue, there could be the need to adjust the
accretable discount which will increase the interest income prospectively on the pools
prospectively. On the other hand, if negative trends continue on
certain portfolios, these could lead to a recognition of a
provision for loan and lease losses and establishing an allowance for loan and lease losses.
NOTE 6 SERVICING ASSETS
The Group periodically sells or securitizes mortgage loans while retaining the obligation to
perform the servicing of such loans. In addition, the Group may purchase or assume the right to
service mortgage loans originated by others. Whenever the Group undertakes an obligation to service
a loan, management assesses whether a servicing asset and/or liability should be recognized. A
servicing asset is recognized whenever the compensation for servicing is expected to more than
adequately compensate the Group for servicing the loans. Likewise, a servicing liability would be
recognized in the event that servicing fees to be received are not expected to adequately
compensate the Group for its expected cost.
All separately recognized servicing assets are recognized at fair value using the fair value
measurement method. Under the fair value measurement method, the Group measures servicing rights at
fair value at each reporting date and reports changes in fair value of servicing asset in earnings
in the period in which the changes occur, and includes these changes, if any, with mortgage banking
activities in the unaudited consolidated statement of operations. The fair value of servicing
rights is subject to fluctuations as a result of changes in estimated and actual prepayment speeds
and default rates and losses.
The fair value of servicing rights is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which
calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into
consideration actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other
economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions.
At September 30, 2010 servicing assets are composed of $8.7 million ($6.1 million September 30,
2009) related to residential mortgage loans and $990 thousand of leasing servicing assets acquired
in the FDIC-assisted acquisition on April 30, 2010.
The following table presents the changes in servicing rights measured using the fair value method
for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
Quarter Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Fair value at beginning of period |
$ | 9,285 | $ | 5,242 | $ | 7,120 | $ | 2,819 | ||||||||
Acquisition of leasing servicing assets from FDIC assisted acquisition |
| | 1,190 | | ||||||||||||
Servicing from mortgage securitizations or assets transfers |
819 | 896 | 2,229 | 2,174 | ||||||||||||
Changes due to payments on loans |
(398 | ) | (101 | ) | (614 | ) | (218 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model
inputs or
assumptions |
(59 | ) | 98 | (278 | ) | 1,360 | ||||||||||
Fair value at end of period |
$ | 9,647 | $ | 6,135 | $ | 9,647 | $ | 6,135 | ||||||||
29
Table of Contents
The following table presents key economic assumptions ranges used in measuring the mortgage
related servicing asset fair value:
Quarter Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Constant prepayment rate |
9.24% - 38.76 | % | 9.23%-31.64 | % | 8.40% - 38.76 | % | 7.52% - 32.22 | % | ||||||||
Discount rate |
11.00% - 14.00 | % | 10.50% - 13.50 | % | 11.00% - 14.00 | % | 10.50% - 13.50 | % |
The discount rate used in measuring the leasing servicing asset fair value ranged from 13.06% to
20.00% from April 30, 2010 (acquisition date) to September 30, 2010.
The sensitivity of the current fair value of servicing assets to immediate 10 percent and 20
percent adverse changes in the above key assumptions were in isolation as follow:
September 30, 2010 | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
Mortgage related servicing asset |
||||
Carrying value of mortgage servicing asset |
$ | 8,657 | ||
Constant prepayment rate |
||||
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change |
$ | (325 | ) | |
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change |
$ | (629 | ) | |
Discount rate |
||||
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change |
$ | (390 | ) | |
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change |
$ | (749 | ) | |
Leasing servicing asset |
||||
Carrying value of leasing servicing asset |
$ | 990 | ||
Discount rate |
||||
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change |
$ | (12 | ) | |
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change |
$ | (24 | ) |
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate,
changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be
extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may
not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the
fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption.
In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in
market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or offset the
sensitivities.
Mortgage banking activities, a component of total banking and wealth management revenues in the
unaudited consolidated statements of operations, include the changes from period to period in the
fair value of the servicing rights, which may result from changes in the valuation model inputs or
assumptions (principally reflecting changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions) and
other changes, including changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows.
Servicing fee income is based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal and is
recorded as income when earned. Servicing fees on mortgage loans totaled $627 thousand and $422
thousand for the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These fees totaled $1.6
million and $1.1 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. There were no late fees and ancillary
fees recorded in such periods. Servicing fees on leases amounted to $135 thousand and $373 thousand
for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, respectively. There were no fees
during 2009.
30
Table of Contents
NOTE 7 PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises and equipment at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization as follows:
Useful Life | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||
(Years) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Land |
| $ | 978 | $ | 978 | |||||||
Buildings and improvements |
40 | 3,096 | 2,982 | |||||||||
Leasehold improvements |
5 10 | 19,504 | 19,198 | |||||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
3 7 | 8,760 | 8,527 | |||||||||
Information technology and other |
3 7 | 17,467 | 16,944 | |||||||||
Vehicles |
3 | 123 | | |||||||||
49,928 | 43,429 | |||||||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(32,803 | ) | (28,854 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 17,125 | $ | 19,775 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment for the quarters ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 totaled $1.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively. For the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, these expenses amounted to $4.2 million and $4.5 million,
respectively. These are included in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations as part of
occupancy and equipment expenses.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010 the Group communicated to the FDIC that it will
exercise its option under the Purchase and Assumption Agreement
executed in connection with the Eurobank acquisition to purchase
certain real properties where two branch banking operations are
conducted for an aggregate amount of $4.6 million. In connection with
the purchase of such real properties, the Group has also exercised
its option to purchase furniture, equipment and information
technology equipment for the aggregate amount of $518 thousand.
NOTE 8 ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE AND OTHER ASSETS
Accrued interest receivable at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consists of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Loans |
$ | 11,186 | $ | 10,888 | ||||
Investments |
19,458 | 22,768 | ||||||
$ | 30,644 | $ | 33,656 | |||||
31
Table of Contents
Other assets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consist of the following:
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Prepaid FDIC insurance |
$ | 18,235 | $ | 22,568 | ||||
Investment in equity indexed options |
7,106 | 6,464 | ||||||
Mortgage tax credits |
1,954 | 3,819 | ||||||
Other prepaid expenses |
7,134 | 4,269 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
2,607 | 3,531 | ||||||
Goodwill |
2,006 | 2,006 | ||||||
Investment in Statutory Trusts |
1,086 | 1,086 | ||||||
Forward settlement swaps |
| 8,511 | ||||||
Other repossessed assets (covered under shared-loss agreements with the FDIC) |
2,748 | | ||||||
Third party servicing advances |
2,162 | | ||||||
Accounts receivable and other assets |
11,530 | 5,535 | ||||||
$ | 56,568 | $ | 57,789 | |||||
On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule requiring insured depository institutions to
prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all
of 2010, 2011, and 2012, on December 30, 2009, along with each institutions risk-based deposit
insurance assessment for the third quarter of 2009. The prepayment of the assessment covering
fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012 amounted to $18.2 million and $22.6 million at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The Group offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of
the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index. The Group uses option agreements with major
broker-dealer companies to manage its exposure to changes in this index. Under the terms of the
option agreements, the Group receives the average increase in the month-end value of the index in
exchange for a fixed premium. The changes in fair value of the option agreements used to manage the
exposure in the stock market in the certificates of deposit are recorded in earnings. At September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the purchased options used to manage the exposure to the stock
market on stock indexed deposits represented an asset of $7.1 million (notional amount of $149.9
million) and $6.5 million (notional amount of $150.7 million), respectively. The options sold to
customers embedded in the certificates of deposit and recorded as deposits in the unaudited
consolidated statement of financial condition, represented at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, a liability of $10.1 million (notional amount of $144.4 million) and $9.5 million (notional
amount of $145.4 million), respectively, and are included in other liabilities on the unaudited
consolidated statements of financial condition.
In December 2007, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico established mortgage loan tax credits to
financial institutions that provided financing for the acquisition of homes by new homeowners in
the period from December 2007 to December 2008 up to a maximum aggregate amount of $220 million in
tax credits overall. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Groups mortgage loan tax
credits amounted to $2.0 million and $3.8 million, respectively.
In March 2009, the Groups banking subsidiary issued $105 million in notes guaranteed under the
FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. Shortly after issuance of the notes, the Group paid
$3.2 million (equivalent to an annual fee of 100 basis points) to the FDIC to maintain the FDIC
guarantee coverage until the maturity of the notes. These costs have been deferred and are being
amortized over the term of the notes. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, this deferred
issue cost was $2.6 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
32
Table of Contents
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were open forward settlement swaps with an
aggregate notional amount of $1.250 billion. The forward settlement date of these swaps is December
28, 2011 for $900.0 million and May 9, 2012 for $350.0 million, with final maturities ranging from
December 28, 2013 through December 28, 2015. A derivative liability of $8.3 million and a
derivative asset of $8.5 million were recognized at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, related to the valuation of these swaps.
Other repossessed assets amounting to $2.7 million at September 30, 2010 represent covered assets
under the FDIC shared-loss agreements and are related to the Eurobank leasing portfolio acquired
under the FDIC-assisted acquisition.
Third-party servicing advances amounting to $2.2 million at September 30, 2010 relates to advances
made to a third party acting as servicer of certain commercial and construction loans acquired
in the FDIC-assisted acquisition.
NOTE 9 DEPOSITS AND RELATED INTEREST
Total deposits as of September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009 consist of the following:
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-interest bearing demand deposits |
$ | 168,590 | $ | 73,548 | ||||
Interest-bearing savings and demand deposits |
953,922 | 706,750 | ||||||
Individual retirement accounts |
351,743 | 312,843 | ||||||
Retail certificates of deposit |
436,706 | 312,410 | ||||||
Total retail deposits |
1,910,961 | 1,405,551 | ||||||
Institutional deposits |
406,266 | 136,683 | ||||||
Brokered deposits |
278,048 | 203,267 | ||||||
$ | 2,595,275 | $ | 1,745,501 | |||||
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the weighted average interest rate of the Groups
deposits was 1.98%, and 3.13%, respectively, inclusive of
non-interest bearing deposit of $168.6
million, and $73.5 million, respectively. Interest expense for the quarters and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is set forth below:
Quarter Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Demand and savings deposits |
$ | 4,586 | $ | 5,295 | $ | 13,047 | $ | 13,766 | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
8,094 | 8,695 | 22,827 | 28,196 | ||||||||||||
$ | 12,680 | $ | 13,990 | $ | 35,874 | $ | 41,962 | |||||||||
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, certificates of deposit in denominations of $100
thousand or higher amounted to $684.3 million and $359.1 million, respectively, including public
fund deposits from various local government agencies of $67.4 million and $63.4 million, which were
collateralized with investment securities with fair value of $75.8 million and $72.6 million,
respectively.
33
Table of Contents
Excluding equity indexed options in the amount of $10.1 million, which are used by the Group to
manage its exposure to the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index, and also excluding accrued
interest of $5.6 million, unamortized deposit premium in the amount of $3.9 million and unamortized
deposit discounts in the amount of $12.6 million, the scheduled maturities of time deposits at
September 30, 2010 are as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Within one year: |
||||
Three (3) months or less |
$ | 288,221 | ||
Over 3 months through 1 year |
714,410 | |||
1,002,631 | ||||
Over 1 through 2 years |
245,683 | |||
Over 2 through 3 years |
137,231 | |||
Over 3 through 4 years |
52,093 | |||
Over 4 through 5 years |
28,142 | |||
$ | 1,465,780 | |||
The aggregate amount of overdraft in demand deposit accounts that were reclassified to loans
amounted to $4.3 million as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $1.6 million).
NOTE 10 BORROWINGS
Short Term Borrowings
At September 30, 2010, short term borrowings amounted to approximately $30.0 million (December 31,
2009 $49.2 million), which mainly consisted of overnight borrowings with a weighted average cost
of 0.58% (December 31, 2009 0.44%).
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase
At September 30, 2010, securities underlying agreements to repurchase were delivered to, and are
being held by, the counterparties with whom the repurchase agreements were transacted. The
counterparties have agreed to resell to the Group the same or similar securities at the maturity of
the agreements.
At September 30, 2010, securities sold under agreements to repurchase (classified by counterparty),
excluding accrued interest in the amount of $6.5 million, were as follows:
Fair Value of | ||||||||
Underlying | ||||||||
Borrowing Balance | Collateral | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. |
$ | 1,600,000 | $ | 1,782,220 | ||||
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC |
1,250,000 | 1,334,907 | ||||||
UBS Financial Services Inc. |
500,000 | 605,277 | ||||||
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA |
185,000 | 210,857 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 3,535,000 | $ | 3,933,261 | ||||
34
Table of Contents
The terms of the Groups structured repurchase agreements range between three and ten years, and
the counterparties have the right to exercise at par on a quarterly basis put options before their
contractual maturity from one to three years after the agreements settlement dates. The following
table shows a summary of these agreements and their terms, excluding accrued interest in the amount
of $6.5 million, at September 30, 2010:
Weighted-Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year of Maturity | Borrowing Balance | Coupon | Settlement Date | Maturity Date | Next Put Date | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 100,000 | 4.17 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 12/28/2010 | ||||||||||||||
350,000 | 4.13 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 12/28/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.29 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 12/28/2010 | |||||||||||||||
350,000 | 4.25 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 12/28/2010 | |||||||||||||||
900,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
350,000 | 4.26 | % | 5/9/2007 | 5/9/2012 | 11/9/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.50 | % | 8/14/2007 | 8/14/2012 | 11/16/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.47 | % | 9/13/2007 | 9/13/2012 | 12/13/2010 | |||||||||||||||
150,000 | 4.31 | % | 3/6/2007 | 12/6/2012 | 12/6/2010 | |||||||||||||||
700,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.72 | % | 7/27/2007 | 7/27/2014 | 10/27/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
||||||||||||||||||||
500,000 | 4.51 | % | 3/2/2007 | 3/2/2017 | 12/2/2010 | |||||||||||||||
250,000 | 0.25 | % | 3/2/2007 | 3/2/2017 | 12/2/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 0.00 | % | 6/6/2007 | 3/6/2017 | 12/6/2010 | |||||||||||||||
900,000 | 0.00 | % | 3/6/2007 | 6/6/2017 | 12/6/2010 | |||||||||||||||
1,750,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 3,450,000 | 2.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||
None of the structured repurchase agreements referred to above with put dates up to the date of
this filing were put by the counterparties at their corresponding put dates. The repurchase
agreements include $1.25 billion, which reset at the put date at a formula which is based on the
three-month LIBOR rate less fifteen times the difference between the ten-year SWAP rate and the
two-year SWAP rate, with a minimum of 0.00% on $1.0 billion and 0.25% on $250 million, and a
maximum of 10.6%. These repurchase agreements bear the respective minimum rates of 0.0% (from March
6, 2009) and 0.25% (from March 2, 2009) to at least their next put dates scheduled for December
2010.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Group entered into a short-term repurchase
agreement in the amount of $85.0 million at a cost of 0.30%. This repurchase agreement was paid off
on October 7, 2010.
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
During 2007, the Group restructured most of its FHLB advances portfolio into longer-term,
structured advances. The terms of these advances range between five and seven years, and the FHLB
has the right to exercise at par on a quarterly basis put options before the contractual maturity
of the advances from six months to one year after the advances settlement dates.
35
Table of Contents
The following table shows a summary of these advances and their terms, excluding accrued interest
in the amount of $1.8 million, at September 30, 2010:
Weighted-Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year of Maturity | Borrowing Balance | Coupon | Settlement Date | Maturity Date | Next Put Date | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 25,000 | 4.37 | % | 5/4/2007 | 5/4/2012 | 11/4/2010 | ||||||||||||||
25,000 | 4.57 | % | 7/24/2007 | 7/24/2012 | 10/25/2010 | |||||||||||||||
25,000 | 4.26 | % | 7/30/2007 | 7/30/2012 | 10/30/2010 | |||||||||||||||
50,000 | 4.33 | % | 8/10/2007 | 8/10/2012 | 11/10/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.09 | % | 8/16/2007 | 8/16/2012 | 11/16/2010 | |||||||||||||||
225,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 4.20 | % | 5/8/2007 | 5/8/2014 | 11/9/2010 | |||||||||||||||
30,000 | 4.22 | % | 5/11/2007 | 5/11/2014 | 11/11/2010 | |||||||||||||||
55,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 280,000 | 4.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||
None of the structured advances from the FHLB referred to above with put dates up to the date of
this filing were put by the counterparty at their corresponding put dates.
Subordinated Capital Notes
Subordinated capital notes amounted to $36.1 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
In August 2003, the Statutory Trust II, special purpose entity of the Group, was formed for the
purpose of issuing trust redeemable preferred securities. In September 2003, $35.0 million of trust
redeemable preferred securities were issued by the Statutory Trust II as part of pooled
underwriting transactions. Pooled underwriting involves participating with other bank holding
companies in issuing the securities through a special purpose pooling vehicle created by the
underwriters.
The proceeds from this issuance were used by the Statutory Trust II to purchase a like amount of
floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated capital notes)
issued by the Group. The subordinated capital notes have a par value of $36.1 million, bear
interest based on 3-month LIBOR plus 295 basis points (3.24% at September 30, 2010; 3.20% at
December 31, 2009), payable quarterly, and mature on September 17, 2033. The subordinated capital
notes purchased by the Statutory Trust II may be called at par after five years and quarterly
thereafter (next call date December 2010). The trust redeemable preferred securities have the same
maturity and call provisions as the subordinated capital notes. The subordinated deferrable
interest debentures issued by the Group are accounted for as a liability denominated as
subordinated capital notes on the unaudited consolidated statements of financial condition.
The subordinated capital notes are treated as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes. Under Federal
Reserve Board rules, restricted core capital elements, which are qualifying trust preferred
securities, qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock (and related surplus) and certain
minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, are limited in the aggregate to no more than 25%
of a bank holding companys core capital elements (including restricted core capital elements), net
of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. However, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act (The Dodd-Frank Act), bank holding companies are prohibited from including in their
Tier 1 capital hybrid debt and equity securities, including trust preferred securities, issued on
or after May 19, 2010. The Group is therefore permitted to continue to include its existing trust
preferred securities as Tier 1 capital.
36
Table of Contents
FDIC- Guaranteed Term Notes Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
The Groups banking subsidiary issued in March 2009 $105 million in notes guaranteed under the FDIC
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. These notes are due on March 16, 2012, bear interest at a
2.75% fixed rate, and are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Interest on the
notes is payable on the 16th of each March and September, beginning September 16, 2009. Shortly
after issuance of the notes, the Group paid $3.2 million (equivalent to an annual fee of 100 basis
points) to the FDIC to maintain the FDIC guarantee coverage until the maturity of the notes. This
cost has been deferred and is being amortized over the term of the notes.
Note Payable to the FDIC
As part of the FDIC-assisted acquisition, the Bank issued to the FDIC a purchase money promissory note
(the Note) in the amount of $715.5 million. The Note was secured by the loans (other than certain
consumer loans) acquired under the Purchase and Assumption Agreement and all proceeds derived from
such loans. The entire outstanding principal balance of the Note was due one year from issuance, or
such earlier date as such amount became due and payable pursuant to the terms of the Note. The Bank
paid interest in arrears on the Note at the annual rate of 0.881% on the 25th day of each month
or, if such day was not a business day, the next succeeding business day, commencing
June 25, 2010, on the outstanding principal amount of the Note. Interest was
calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. On September 27,
2010, the Group made the strategic decision to repay the Note prior to maturity. At the time of
repayment the Note had an outstanding principal balance of $595.0 million. For the cancelation of
the Note, the Group used approximately $200.0 million of proceeds from the sale of available for
sale securities, brokered certificates of deposit amounting to $134.7 million, short-term
repurchase agreements amounting to $85.0 million, and $175.3 million of cash.
NOTE 11 DERIVATIVE ACTIVITIES
The Group may use various derivative instruments as part of its asset and liability management.
These transactions involve both credit and market risks. The notional amounts are amounts on which
calculations, payments, and the value of the derivatives are based. Notional amounts do not
represent direct credit exposures. Direct credit exposure is limited to the net difference between
the calculated amounts to be received and paid, if any. The actual risk of loss is the cost of
replacing, at market, these contracts in the event of default by the counterparties. The Group
controls the credit risk of its derivative financial instrument agreements through credit
approvals, limits, monitoring procedures and collateral, when considered necessary.
Derivative instruments are generally negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) contracts. Negotiated OTC
derivatives are generally entered into between two counterparties that negotiate specific
contractual terms, including the underlying instrument, amount, exercise price, and maturity.
The Group generally uses interest rate swaps and options in managing its interest rate risk
exposure. Under the swaps, the Group usually pays a fixed monthly or quarterly cost and receives a
floating thirty or ninety-day payment based on LIBOR. Floating rate payments received from the swap
counterparties partially offset the interest payments to be made. If market conditions warrant, the
Group might terminate the swaps prior to their maturity.
The following table shows a summary of these swaps and their terms, at September 30, 2010:
Notional Amount | Fixed Rate | Trade Date | Settlement Date | Maturity Date | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Forward settlement into two year contract |
$ | 300,000 | 1.5040 | % | 08/18/10 | 12/28/11 | 12/28/13 | |||||||||||||
Forward settlement into three year contract |
300,000 | 1.8450 | % | 08/18/10 | 12/28/11 | 12/28/14 | ||||||||||||||
Forward settlement into four year contract |
300,000 | 2.1550 | % | 08/18/10 | 12/28/11 | 12/28/15 | ||||||||||||||
Forward settlement into two year contract |
350,000 | 1.8275 | % | 08/13/10 | 05/09/12 | 05/09/14 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
37
Table of Contents
During the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, losses of $22.6 million and
$59.8 million, respectively, were recognized and reflected as Derivatives in the unaudited
consolidated statements of operations. These losses on derivative activities included realized
losses of $17.3 million and $42.0 million in the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30,
2010, respectively, due to the terminations of forward-settle swaps with a notional amount of $900
million. These terminations allowed the Group to enter into new forward-settle swap contracts for
the same notional amount and maturity, and effectively reduce the interest rate of the pay-fixed
side of such deals from an average rate of 3.53% to an average rate of 1.83%. The remaining losses
mainly represent unrealized losses on new interest rate swaps. A derivative liability of $8.3
million and a derivative asset of $8.5 million were recognized at September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively, related to the valuation of these swaps.
The Group offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of
the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index. The Group uses option agreements with major
broker-dealer companies to manage its exposure to changes in this index. Under the terms of the
option agreements, the Group receives the average increase in the month-end value of the index in
exchange for a fixed premium. The changes in fair value of the option agreements used to manage the
exposure in the stock market in the certificates of deposit are recorded in earnings.
There were no derivatives designated as a hedge as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the purchased options used to manage the exposure to the
stock market on stock indexed deposits represented an asset of $7.1 million (notional amount of
$149.9 million) and $6.5 million (notional amount of $150.7 million), respectively; the options
sold to customers embedded in the certificates of deposit and recorded as deposits in the unaudited
consolidated statement of financial condition, represented a liability of $10.1 million (notional
amount of $144.4 million) and $9.5 million (notional amount of $145.4 million), respectively, and
are included in other liabilities on the unaudited consolidated statements of financial condition.
NOTE 12 INCOME TAX
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended, all companies are treated as
separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated returns. The Group and its
subsidiaries are subject to Puerto Rico regular income tax or alternative minimum tax (AMT) on
income earned from all sources. The AMT is payable if it exceeds regular income tax. The excess of
AMT over regular income tax paid in any one year may be used to offset regular income tax in future
years, subject to certain limitations. The Group maintained an effective tax rate lower than the
maximum marginal statutory rate of 40.95% as of September 30, 2010 and 2009, mainly due to the
income from the Banks international banking entity whose tax rate is 5% on both periods, and
interest income arising from investments exempt from Puerto Rico income taxes, net of disallowed
expenses attributable to the exempt income. Exempt interest relates mostly to interest earned on
obligations of the United States and Puerto Rico governments and certain mortgage-backed
securities, including securities held by the Banks international banking entity. Pursuant to the
Declaration of Fiscal Emergency and Omnibus Plan for Economic Stabilization and Restoration of the
Puerto Rico Credit Act of March 9, 2009, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2008, and
ending before January 1, 2012, every taxable corporation engaged in trade or business in Puerto
Rico, including banks and insurance companies, are subject to an additional 5% surcharge on
corporate income tax, increasing the maximum tax rate from 39% to 40.95%. Also, income earned by
international banking entities, which was previously fully exempt, is subject to a 5% income tax
during the same period. These temporary taxes were enacted as a measure to generate additional
revenues to address the fiscal crisis that the government of Puerto Rico is currently facing.
The Group classifies unrecognized tax benefits in income taxes payable. These gross unrecognized
tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if realized. The balance of unrecognized tax
benefits at September 30, 2010 was $6.6 million (December 31, 2009 $6.3 million), and variance is
mainly associated with accrued interests. The tax periods from 2005 to 2009, remain subject to
examination by the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury.
The Groups policy to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within
the provision for taxes on the consolidated statements of operations did not change as a result of
implementing these provisions. The Group had accrued $2.4 million at September 30, 2010 (December
31, 2009 $2.1 million) for the payment of interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax
benefits.
38
Table of Contents
NOTE 13 STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Treasury Stock
Under the Groups current stock repurchase program it is authorized to purchase in the open market
up to $15.0 million of its outstanding shares on common stock. The shares of common stock
repurchased are to be held by the Group as treasury shares. There were no repurchases during the
quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be
repurchased under the program amounted to $11.3 million at September 30, 2010.
The activity in connection with common shares held in treasury by the Group for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is set forth below:
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Dollar | Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
1,504 | $ | 17,142 | 1,442 | $ | 17,109 | ||||||||||
Common shares repurchased /(used) to match defined contribution plan, net |
(14 | ) | (26 | ) | 65 | 38 | ||||||||||
End of period |
1,490 | $ | 17,116 | 1,507 | $ | 17,147 | ||||||||||
EquityBased Compensation Plans
The Omnibus Plan was amended and restated in 2008 and further amended in 2010. It provides for
equity-based compensation incentives through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, restricted units, and dividend equivalents, as well as equity-based
performance awards. The Omnibus Plan replaced and superseded the Stock Option Plans. All
outstanding stock options under the Stock Option Plans continue in full force and effect, subject
to their original terms.
The activity in outstanding stock options for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 is set
forth below:
Nine-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||
Number | Average | |||||||
Of | Exercise | |||||||
Options | Price | |||||||
Beginning of period |
514,376 | $ | 16.86 | |||||
Options granted |
162,700 | 11.98 | ||||||
Options exercised |
(8,337 | ) | 8.60 | |||||
Options forfeited |
(3,000 | ) | 22.21 | |||||
End of period |
665,739 | $ | 15.75 | |||||
39
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the range of exercise prices and the weighted average remaining
contractual life of the options outstanding at September 30, 2010:
Outstanding | Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Contract | Number of | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices | Options | Exercise Price | Life (Years) | Options | Price | |||||||||||||||
$5.63 to $8.45 |
15,677 | $ | 8.28 | 8.6 | 1 | $ | 7.74 | |||||||||||||
8.45 to 11.27 |
2,000 | 10.29 | 6.9 | 500 | 10.29 | |||||||||||||||
11.27 to 14.09 |
408,527 | 12.24 | 6.9 | 144,452 | 12.41 | |||||||||||||||
14.09 to 16.90 |
62,035 | 15.60 | 3.9 | 54,035 | 15.68 | |||||||||||||||
19.72 to 22.54 |
29,600 | 20.70 | 4.4 | 22,100 | 20.30 | |||||||||||||||
22.54 to 25.35 |
88,850 | 23.98 | 3.6 | 88,850 | 23.98 | |||||||||||||||
25.35 to 28.17 |
59,050 | 27.46 | 4.1 | 59,050 | 27.46 | |||||||||||||||
665,739 | $ | 15.75 | 5.8 | 368,988 | 18.55 | |||||||||||||||
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
$ | 552,439 | $ | 134,721 | ||||||||||||||||
The average fair value of each stock option granted in 2010 was $6.02. The average fair value
of each stock option granted was estimated at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair
value of traded options that have no restrictions and are fully transferable and negotiable in a
free trading market. Black-Scholes does not consider the employment, transfer or vesting
restrictions that are inherent in the Groups employee stock options. Use of an option valuation
model, as required by GAAP, includes highly subjective assumptions based on long-term predictions,
including the expected stock price volatility and average life of each option grant.
The activity in restricted units under the Omnibus Plan for the nine-month period ended September
30, 2010 is set forth below:
Nine-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Restricted | Grant Date | |||||||
Units | Fair Value | |||||||
Beginning of period |
147,625 | $ | 14.64 | |||||
Restricted units granted |
81,000 | 12.33 | ||||||
Restricted units exercised |
| | ||||||
Restricted units forfeited |
(5,100 | ) | 14.12 | |||||
End of period |
||||||||
223,525 | $ | 13.72 | ||||||
40
Table of Contents
Earnings per Common Share
The calculation of earnings per common share for the quarters and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
Quarter Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (6,595 | ) | $ | 21,327 | $ | 15,284 | $ | 96,990 | |||||||
Less: Dividends on preferred stock |
(1,200 | ) | (1,201 | ) | (4,134 | ) | (3,602 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Deemed dividend on preferred stock beneficial
conversion feature |
(22,711 | ) | | (22,711 | ) | | ||||||||||
Income available (loss) to common shareholders |
$ | (30,506 | ) | $ | 20,126 | $ | (11,561 | ) | $ | 93,388 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares and share equivalents: |
||||||||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding |
45,354 | 24,303 | 34,823 | 24,284 | ||||||||||||
Average potential common shares-options |
128 | 65 | 105 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Total |
45,482 | 24,368 | 34,928 | 24,301 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share basic |
$ | (0.67 | ) | $ | 0.83 | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 3.85 | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share diluted |
$ | (0.67 | ) | $ | 0.83 | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 3.84 | ||||||
For the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, weighted-average stock options
with an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share not included in the calculation amounted to
312,700 and 420,200, respectively, compared to 303,046 and 494,874 for the same periods in 2009.
The conversion of mandatorily convertible non-cumulative non-voting perpetual preferred stock,
Series C, into shares of the Groups common stock, resulted
in a non-cash beneficial conversion feature of
$22.7 million, representing the intrinsic value between the conversion rate of $15.015 and the
common stock closing price of $16.72 on April 30, 2010, the date
the preferred shares were offered. Upon conversion the beneficial conversion feature was recorded as a deemed dividend to the preferred stockholders reducing
retained earnings, with a corresponding offset to surplus (paid in capital), and thus did not
affect total stockholders equity or the book value of the common stock. However, the deemed
dividend increased the net loss applicable to common stock and affected the calculation of basic
and diluted EPS for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010. Moreover, in computing
diluted EPS, dilutive convertible securities that remained outstanding for the period prior to
actual conversion were not included as average potential common shares because the effect would
have been antidilutive. In computing both basic and diluted EPS, the common shares issued upon
actual conversion were included in the weighted average calculation of common shares, after the
date of conversion, that they remained outstanding.
Legal Surplus
The Banking Act requires that a minimum of 10% of the Banks net income for the year be transferred
to a reserve fund until such fund (legal surplus) equals the total paid in capital on common and
preferred stock. At September 30, 2010, legal surplus amounted to $47.0 million (December 31, 2009
- $45.3 million). The amount transferred to the legal surplus account is not available for the
payment of dividends to shareholders. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy
statement that bank holding companies should generally pay dividends only from operating earnings
of the current and preceding two years.
Preferred Stock
On May 28, 1999, the Group issued 1,340,000 shares of 7.125% Noncumulative Monthly Income Preferred
Stock, Series A, at $25 per share. Proceeds from issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, were
$32.4 million, net of $1.1 million of issuance costs. The Series A Preferred Stock has the
following characteristics: (1) annual dividends of $1.78 per share, payable monthly, if declared by
the Board of Directors; missed dividends are not cumulative, (2) redeemable at the Groups option
beginning on May 30, 2004, (3) no mandatory redemption or stated maturity date and (4) liquidation
value of $25 per share.
41
Table of Contents
On September 30, 2003, the Group issued 1,380,000 shares of 7.0% Noncumulative Monthly Income
Preferred Stock, Series B, at $25 per share. Proceeds from issuance of the Series B Preferred
Stock, were $33.1 million, net of $1.4 million of issuance costs. The Series B Preferred Stock has
the following characteristics: (1) annual dividends of $1.75 per share, payable monthly, if
declared by the Board of Directors; missed dividends are not cumulative, (2) redeemable at the
Groups option beginning on October 31, 2008, (3) no mandatory redemption or stated maturity date,
and (4) liquidation value of $25 per share.
At the annual meeting of shareholders held on April 30, 2010, a majority of the outstanding shares
entitled to vote approved an increase of the number of authorized shares of preferred stock, par
value $1.00 per share, from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000.
On April 30, 2010, the Group issued 200,000 shares of Mandatorily Convertible Non-Cumulative
Non-Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (the Series C Preferred Stock), through a private
placement. The preferred stock had a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. At a special
meeting of shareholders of the Group held on June 30, 2010, the majority of the shareholders
approved the issuance of 13,320,000 shares of the Groups common stock upon the conversion of the
Series C Preferred Stock, which was converted on July 8, 2010 at a conversion price of $15.015 per
share.
The difference between the $15.015 per share conversion price and the market price of the common
stock on April 30, 2010 ($16.72) was considered a contingent beneficial conversion feature on June
30, 2010, when the conversion was approved by the majority of the shareholders. Such feature
amounted to $22.7 million at June 30, 2010 and was recorded
as a dividend of preferred stock upon conversion to common stock.
Common Stock
On March 19, 2010, the Group completed the public offering of 8,740,000 shares of its common stock.
The offering resulted in net proceeds of $94.5 million after deducting offering costs.
At the annual meeting of shareholders held on April 30, 2010, a majority of the outstanding shares
entitled to vote approved an increase of the number of authorized shares of common stock, par value
$1.00 per share, from 40,000,000 to 100,000,000.
At a special meeting of shareholders of the Group held on June 30, 2010, the majority of the
shareholders approved the issuance of 13,320,000 shares of the Groups common stock upon the
conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock, which was converted on July 8, 2010 at a conversion
price of $15.015 per share.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax, as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 consisted of:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale which are not other-than-temporarily impaired |
$ | 27,566 | $ | (48,786 | ) | |||
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale for which a portion of other-than-temporary
impairment has been recorded in earnings |
(14,359 | ) | (41,398 | ) | ||||
Tax effect of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
(128 | ) | 7,445 | |||||
$ | 13,079 | $ | (82,739 | ) | ||||
42
Table of Contents
Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Group (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Groups and the Banks
financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Group and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as
calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other
factors. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, federal banking
regulators are required to establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements, on a consolidated
basis, for insured institutions, depository institution holding companies,
and non-bank financial companies supervised by the Federal Reserve Board. The minimum leverage and
risk-based capital requirements are to be determined based on the minimum ratios established for
insured depository institutions under prompt corrective action regulations.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Group and
the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and
Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the
regulations) and of Tier I capital to average assets (as defined in the regulations). As of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Group and the Bank met all capital adequacy
requirements to which they are subject.
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the FDIC categorized the Bank as well capitalized
under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized,
an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I
risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios
as set forth in the following tables.
The Groups and the Banks actual capital amounts and ratios as of September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009 are as follows:
Minimum Capital | ||||||||||||||||
Actual | Requirement | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Group Ratios |
||||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
|
$ | 739,062 | 25.02 | % | $ | 236,269 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
|
$ | 708,869 | 24.00 | % | $ | 118,134 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier I Capital to Total Assets
|
$ | 708,869 | 8.99 | % | $ | 315,235 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
|
$ | 437,975 | 19.84 | % | $ | 176,591 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
|
$ | 414,702 | 18.79 | % | $ | 88,295 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier I Capital to Total Assets
|
$ | 414,702 | 6.52 | % | $ | 254,323 | 4.00 | % |
43
Table of Contents
Minimum to be Well | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized Under | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum Capital | Prompt Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Requirement | Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank Ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
|
$ | 701,715 | 23.98 | % | $ | 234,112 | 8.00 | % | $ | 292,640 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
|
$ | 671,522 | 22.95 | % | $ | 117,056 | 4.00 | % | $ | 175,584 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Total Assets
|
$ | 671,522 | 8.68 | % | $ | 309,548 | 4.00 | % | $ | 386,934 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
|
$ | 382,611 | 17.59 | % | $ | 174,042 | 8.00 | % | $ | 217,553 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
|
$ | 359,339 | 16.52 | % | $ | 87,021 | 4.00 | % | $ | 130,532 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Total Assets
|
$ | 359,339 | 5.78 | % | $ | 248,678 | 4.00 | % | $ | 310,847 | 5.00 | % |
The Groups ability to pay dividends to its stockholders and other activities can be
restricted if its capital falls below levels established by the Federal Reserve Boards guidelines.
In addition, any bank holding company whose capital falls below levels specified in the guidelines
can be required to implement a plan to increase capital.
NOTE 14 FAIR VALUE
As discussed in Note 1, the Group follows the fair value measurement framework under GAAP.
Fair Value Measurement
The fair value measurement framework defines fair value as the exchange price that would be
received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. This framework also establishes a fair value hierarchy which
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs previously
described that may be used to measure fair value.
Money market investments
The fair value of money market investments is based on the carrying amounts reflected in the
consolidated statements of financial condition as these are reasonable estimates of fair value
given the short-term nature of the instruments.
Investment securities
The fair value of investment securities is based on quoted market prices, when available, or market
prices provided by recognized broker-dealers. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair
value is based upon externally developed models that use both observable and unobservable inputs
depending on the market activity of the instrument. Structured credit investments and non-agency
collateralized mortgage obligations are classified as Level 3. The estimated fair value of the
structured credit investments and the non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations are determined
by using a third-party cash flow valuation model to calculate the present value of projected future
cash flows. The assumptions, which are highly uncertain and require a high degree of judgment,
include primarily market discount rates, current spreads, duration, leverage, default, home price
depreciation, and loss rates. The assumptions used are drawn from a wide array of data sources,
including the performance of the collateral underlying each deal. The external-based valuation,
which is obtained at least on a quarterly basis, is analyzed by management and its assumptions are
evaluated and incorporated in either an internal-based valuation model when deemed necessary or
compared to counterparties prices and agreed by management.
44
Table of Contents
Derivative instruments
The fair values of the derivative instruments were provided by valuation experts and
counterparties. Certain derivatives with limited market activity are valued using externally
developed models that consider unobservable market parameters. Based on the valuation methodology,
derivative instruments are classified as Level 3. The Group offers its customers certificates of
deposit with an option tied to the performance of the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index
(S&P 500 Index), and uses equity indexed option agreements with major broker-dealer companies to
manage its exposure to changes in this index. Their fair value is obtained through the use of an
external based valuation that was thoroughly evaluated and adopted by management as its measurement
tool for these options. The payoff of these options is linked to the average value of the S&P 500
Index on a specific set of dates during the life of the option. The methodology uses an average
rate option or a cash-settled option whose payoff is based on the difference between the expected
average value of the S&P 500 Index during the remaining life of the option and the strike price at
inception. The assumptions, which are uncertain and require a degree of judgment, include primarily
S&P 500 Index volatility, forward interest rate projections, estimated index dividend payout, and
leverage.
Fair value of interest rate swaps is based on the net discounted value of the contractual projected
cash flows of both the pay-fixed receive-variable legs of the contracts. The projected cash flows
are based on the forward yield curve, and discounted using current estimated market rates.
Servicing assets
Servicing assets do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. Servicing assets
are priced using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers servicing fees,
portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary
revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Due to unobservable nature of certain
valuation inputs, the servicing assets are classified as Level 3.
Loans receivable considered impaired that are collateral dependent
The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from
appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-10-35. The associated loans
considered impaired are classified as Level 3.
Foreclosed real estate
Foreclosed real estate includes real estate properties securing residential mortgage and commercial
loans. The fair value of foreclosed real estate may be determined using an external appraisal,
broker price option or an internal valuation. These foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3
given certain internal adjustments that may be made to external appraisals.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial liabilities
for which the Group has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
$ | | $ | 4,211,399 | $ | 105,689 | $ | 4,317,088 | ||||||||
Money market investments |
53,233 | | | 53,233 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
| | 7,106 | 7,106 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
| (8,289 | ) | (10,108 | ) | (18,397 | ) | |||||||||
Servicing assets |
| | 9,647 | 9,647 | ||||||||||||
$ | 53,233 | $ | 4,203,110 | $ | 112,334 | $ | 4,368,677 | |||||||||
45
Table of Contents
The table below presents reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the quarter ended September 30,
2010:
Total Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
(Quarter Ended September 30, 2010) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment | ||||||||||||||||
securities | Derivative | Derivative | Servicing | |||||||||||||
available-for-sale | asset | liability | assets | |||||||||||||
Level 3 Instruments Only | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 113,411 | $ | 4,433 | $ | (7,473 | ) | $ | 9,285 | |||||||
Gains (losses) included in earnings |
(14,739 | ) | 2,392 | (2,440 | ) | | ||||||||||
Changes in fair value of investment
securities available for sale included
in other comprehensive income |
10,419 | | | | ||||||||||||
New instruments acquired |
| 281 | (278 | ) | 819 | |||||||||||
Principal repayments and amortization |
(3,402 | ) | | 83 | (398 | ) | ||||||||||
Changes in fair value of servicing assets |
| | | (59 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 105,689 | $ | 7,106 | $ | (10,108 | ) | $ | 9,647 | |||||||
The table below presents reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2010:
Total Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
(Nine-Month period Ended September 30, 2010) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment | ||||||||||||||||
securities | ||||||||||||||||
available- | Derivative | Derivative | Servicing | |||||||||||||
for-sale | asset | liability | assets | |||||||||||||
Level 3 Instruments Only | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 110,106 | $ | 6,464 | $ | (9,543 | ) | $ | 7,120 | |||||||
Gains (losses) included in earnings |
(17,166 | ) | (177 | ) | (128 | ) | | |||||||||
Changes in fair value of investment
securities available for sale included
in other comprehensive
income |
22,949 | | | | ||||||||||||
New instruments acquired |
| 1,147 | (1,157 | ) | 3,419 | |||||||||||
Principal repayments and amortization |
(10,200 | ) | (328 | ) | 720 | (614 | ) | |||||||||
Changes in fair value of servicing assets |
| | | (278 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 105,689 | $ | 7,106 | $ | (10,108 | ) | $ | 9,647 | |||||||
There were no transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2010.
46
Table of Contents
The table below presents a detail of investment securities available-for-sale classified as Level 3
at September 30, 2010:
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Weighted Average | Principal | |||||||||||||||||
Type | Cost | Losses | Fair Value | Yield | Protection | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Alt-A Collateral |
$ | 85,754 | $ | 22,508 | $ | 63,246 | 4.87 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
||||||||||||||||||||
CDO |
25,548 | 8,419 | 17,129 | 5.80 | % | 6.22 | % | |||||||||||||
CLO |
15,000 | 4,803 | 10,197 | 2.53 | % | 7.64 | % | |||||||||||||
CLO |
11,975 | 3,632 | 8,344 | 2.06 | % | 26.18 | % | |||||||||||||
CLO |
9,200 | 2,427 | 6,773 | 2.38 | % | 20.64 | % | |||||||||||||
61,723 | 19,281 | 42,443 | 3.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 147,477 | $ | 41,789 | $ | 105,689 | 4.41 | % | |||||||||||||
Additionally, the Group may be required to measure certain assets at fair value in periods
subsequent to initial recognition on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. The adjustments
to fair value usually result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting,
identification of impaired loans requiring specific reserves under ASC 310-10-35 or write-downs of
individual assets.
The following table presents financial and non-financial assets that were subject to a fair value
measurement on a nonrecurring basis during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and which were
still included in the unaudited consolidated statement of financial condition at such date. The
amounts disclosed represent the aggregate of the fair value measurements of those assets as of the
end of the reporting period.
Carrying value at | ||||||||
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Level 3 | Level 3 | |||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||
Impaired commercial loans |
$ | 24,766 | $ | 26,299 | ||||
Foreclosed real estate |
33,087 | 9,347 | ||||||
$ | 57,853 | $ | 35,646 | |||||
Impaired commercial loans relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The
impairment of commercial loans was measured based on the fair value of collateral, which is derived
from appraisals that take into consideration prices on observed transactions involving similar
assets in similar locations, in accordance with provisions of ASC 310-10-35. Foreclosed real estate
represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate (including those covered under FDIC shared-loss
agreements) that was measured at fair value less estimated costs to sell.
Impaired commercial loans, which are measured using the fair value of the collateral for collateral
dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $24.8 million and $9.4 million at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, with a valuation allowance of $524 thousand and $709 thousand at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The information about the estimated fair value of financial instruments required by GAAP is
presented hereunder. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent
managements estimate of the underlying value of the Group.
47
Table of Contents
The estimated fair value is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions
could affect these fair value estimates. The fair value estimates do not take into consideration
the value of future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not financial
instruments. Other significant tangible and intangible assets that are not considered financial
instruments are the value of long-term customer relationships of the retail deposits, and premises
and equipment.
The estimated fair value and carrying value of the Groups financial instruments at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009 is as follows:
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Carrying | Fair | Carrying | |||||||||||||
Value | Value | Value | Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 142,936 | $ | 142,936 | $ | 277,123 | $ | 277,123 | ||||||||
Trading securities |
102 | 102 | 523 | 523 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
4,317,088 | 4,317,088 | 4,953,659 | 4,953,659 | ||||||||||||
FHLB stock |
22,496 | 22,496 | 19,937 | 19,937 | ||||||||||||
Securities
sold but not yet delivered |
317,209 | 317,209 | | | ||||||||||||
Total loans (including loans held-for-sale) |
1,823,093 | 1,861,628 | 1,150,340 | 1,140,069 | ||||||||||||
Investment in equity indexed options |
7,106 | 7,106 | 6,464 | 6,464 | ||||||||||||
FDIC loss-share indemnification asset |
567,898 | 562,364 | | | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
30,644 | 30,644 | 33,656 | 33,656 | ||||||||||||
Derivative asset |
| | 8,511 | 8,511 | ||||||||||||
Servicing asset |
9,647 | 9,647 | 7,120 | 7,120 | ||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
2,595,109 | 2,595,275 | 1,741,417 | 1,745,501 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,856,245 | 3,541,520 | 3,777,157 | 3,557,308 | ||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
308,591 | 281,753 | 301,004 | 281,753 | ||||||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
106,939 | 105,112 | 111,472 | 105,834 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
36,083 | 36,083 | 36,083 | 36,083 | ||||||||||||
Short term borrowings |
29,959 | 29,959 | 49,179 | 49,179 | ||||||||||||
Securities purchased but not yet received |
| | 413,359 | 413,359 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liability |
8,289 | 8,289 | | | ||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
88,006 | 88,006 | 31,650 | 31,650 |
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of significant
financial instruments at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
| Cash and cash equivalents, money market investments, time deposits with other banks, securities sold but not yet delivered, accrued interest receivable and payable, securities and loans purchased but not yet received, short term borrowings, accrued expenses and other liabilities have been valued at the carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated statements of financial condition as these are reasonable estimates of fair value given the short-term nature of the instruments. |
| Investments in FHLB stock are valued at their redemption value. |
48
Table of Contents
| The fair value of investment securities is based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices provided by recognized broker dealers. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon externally developed models that use both observable and unobservable inputs depending on the market activity of the instrument. The estimated fair value of the structured credit investments and the non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations are determined by using a third-party cash flow valuation model to calculate the present value of projected future cash flows. The assumptions used, which are highly uncertain and require a high degree of judgment, include primarily market discount rates, current spreads, duration, leverage, default, home price depreciation, and loss rates. The assumptions used are drawn from a wide array of data sources, including the performance of the collateral underlying each security. The external-based valuation, which is obtained at least on a quarterly basis, is analyzed and its assumptions are evaluated and incorporated in either an internal-based valuation model when deemed necessary or compared to counterparties prices and agreed by management. |
| The FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset is measured separately from each of the covered asset categories as it is not contractually embedded in any of the covered asset categories. The $562.4 million fair value of the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset represents the present value of the estimated cash payments (net of amount owed to the FDIC) expected to be received from the FDIC for future losses on covered assets based on the credit assumptions on estimated cash flows for each covered asset pool and the loss sharing percentages. The ultimate collectability of the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset is dependent upon the performance of the underlying covered loans, the passage of time and claims paid by the FDIC which are impacted by the Banks adherence to certain guidelines established by the FDIC. |
| The fair values of the derivative instruments are provided by valuation experts and counterparties. Certain derivatives with limited market activity are valued using externally developed models that consider unobservable market parameters. The Group offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of the S&P 500 Index, and uses equity indexed option agreements with major broker-dealer companies to manage its exposure to changes in this index. Their fair value is obtained through the use of an external based valuation that was thoroughly evaluated and adopted by management as its measurement tool for these options. The payoff of these options is linked to the average value of the S&P 500 Index on a specific set of dates during the life of the option. The methodology uses an average rate option or a cash-settled option whose payoff is based on the difference between the expected average value of the S&P 500 Index during the remaining life of the option and the strike price at inception. The assumptions, which are uncertain and require a degree of judgment, include primarily S&P 500 Index volatility, forward interest rate projections, estimated index dividend payout, and leverage. |
| Fair value of interest rate swaps is based on the net discounted value of the contractual projected cash flows of both the pay-fixed receive-variable legs of the contracts. The projected cash flows are based on the forward yield curve, and discounted using current estimated market rates. |
| The fair value of the loan portfolio (including loans held-for-sale) is estimated by segregating by type, such as mortgage, commercial, consumer and leases. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable interest rates and by performing and non-performing categories. The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows, adjusted for prepayment estimates, if any, using estimated current market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan, which is not currently an indication of an exit price. An exit price valuation approach could result in a different fair value estimate. |
| The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of the contractual cash flows, using estimated current market discount rates for deposits of similar remaining maturities. |
| For short-term borrowings, the carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value. The subordinated capital note has a par value of $36.1 million, bears interest based on 3-month LIBOR plus 295 basis points (3.24% at September 30, 2010; 3.20% at December 31, 2009), payable quarterly. The fair value of long-term borrowings is based on the discounted value of the contractual cash flows, using current estimated market discount rates for borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities and put dates. |
| The fair value of commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit is based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties credit standings. |
| The fair value of servicing assets is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions. |
49
Table of Contents
NOTE 15 SEGMENT REPORTING
The Group segregates its businesses into the following major reportable segments of business:
Banking, Wealth Management, and Treasury. Management established the reportable segments based on
the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources.
Other factors such as the Groups organization, nature of its products, distribution channels and
economic characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of the
reportable segments. The Group measures the performance of these reportable segments based on
pre-established goals of different financial parameters such as net income, net interest income,
loan production, and fees generated. The Groups methodology for allocating non-interest expenses
among segments is based on several factors such as revenues, employee headcount, occupied space,
dedicated services or time, among others. These factors are reviewed on a periodical basis and may
change if the conditions warrant.
Banking includes the Banks branches and mortgage banking, with traditional banking products such
as deposits and mortgage, commercial, leasing and consumer loans. Mortgage banking activities are
carried out by the Banks mortgage banking division, whose principal activity is to originate
mortgage loans for the Groups own portfolio. As part of its mortgage banking activities, the Group
may sell loans directly into the secondary market or securitize conforming loans into
mortgage-backed securities.
Wealth Management is comprised of the Banks trust division (Oriental Trust), the broker-dealer
subsidiary (Oriental Financial Services Corp.), the insurance agency subsidiary (Oriental
Insurance, Inc.), and the pension plan administration subsidiary (Caribbean Pension Consultants,
Inc.). The core operations of this segment are financial planning, money management and investment
banking, brokerage services, insurance sales activity, corporate and individual trust and
retirement services, as well as pension plan administration services.
The Treasury segment encompasses all of the Groups asset and liability management activities such
as: purchases and sales of investment securities, interest rate risk management, derivatives, and
borrowings. Intersegment sales and transfers, if any, are accounted for as if the sales or
transfers were to third parties, that is, at current market prices. The accounting policies of the
segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
included in the Groups annual report on Form 10-K, as amended.
50
Table of Contents
Following are the results of operations and the selected financial information by operating
segment as of and for the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
Wealth | Total Major | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Banking | Management | Treasury | Segments | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 34,345 | $ | 3 | $ | 46,873 | $ | 81,221 | $ | | $ | 81,221 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(10,727 | ) | | (32,334 | ) | (43,061 | ) | | (43,061 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
23,618 | 3 | 14,539 | 38,160 | | 38,160 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
(4,100 | ) | | | (4,100 | ) | | (4,100 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest income (loss) |
9,303 | 3,693 | (23,304 | ) | (10,308 | ) | | (10,308 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
(24,670 | ) | (4,690 | ) | (3,345 | ) | (32,705 | ) | | (32,705 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
449 | | | 449 | (449 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment expenses |
| (384 | ) | (65 | ) | (449 | ) | 449 | | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 4,600 | $ | (1,378 | ) | $ | (12,175 | ) | $ | (8,953 | ) | $ | | $ | (8,953 | ) | ||||||||
Total assets as of September 30, 2010 |
$ | 3,310,914 | $ | 11,249 | $ | 4,801,370 | $ | 8,123,533 | $ | (720,476 | ) | $ | 7,403,057 | |||||||||||
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 18,248 | $ | 5 | $ | 60,297 | $ | 78,550 | $ | | $ | 78,550 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(9,370 | ) | | (36,289 | ) | (45,659 | ) | | (45,659 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
8,878 | 5 | 24,008 | 32,891 | | 32,891 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
(4,400 | ) | | | (4,400 | ) | | (4,400 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest income (loss) |
3,404 | 3,755 | 9,163 | 16,322 | | 16,322 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
(13,153 | ) | (4,224 | ) | (3,108 | ) | (20,485 | ) | | (20,485 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
297 | | | 297 | (297 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment expenses |
| (299 | ) | 2 | (297 | ) | 297 | | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (4,974 | ) | $ | (763 | ) | $ | 30,065 | $ | 24,328 | $ | | $ | 24,328 | ||||||||||
Total assets as of September 30, 2009 |
$ | 1,667,257 | $ | 8,981 | $ | 5,093,235 | $ | 6,769,473 | $ | (388,427 | ) | $ | 6,381,046 | |||||||||||
51
Table of Contents
Following are the results of operations and the selected financial information by operating
segment as of and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
Wealth | Total Major | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Banking | Management | Treasury | Segments | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine-Month period ended September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 81,381 | $ | 10 | $ | 150,009 | $ | 231,400 | $ | | $ | 231,400 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(29,238 | ) | | (97,563 | ) | (126,801 | ) | | (126,801 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
52,143 | 10 | 52,446 | 104,599 | | 104,599 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
(12,214 | ) | | | (12,214 | ) | | (12,214 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest income (loss) |
29,762 | 12,910 | (39,085 | ) | 3,587 | | 3,587 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
(58,576 | ) | (12,714 | ) | (9,660 | ) | (80,950 | ) | | (80,950 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
1,169 | 763 | | 1,932 | (1,932 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment expenses |
| (1,784 | ) | (148 | ) | (1,932 | ) | 1,932 | | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 12,284 | $ | (815 | ) | $ | 3,553 | $ | 15,022 | $ | | $ | 15,022 | |||||||||||
Nine-Month period ended September 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 55,329 | $ | 39 | $ | 189,218 | $ | 244,586 | $ | | $ | 244,586 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(26,923 | ) | | (118,565 | ) | (145,488 | ) | | (145,488 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
28,406 | 39 | 70,653 | 99,098 | | 99,098 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
(11,250 | ) | | | (11,250 | ) | | (11,250 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest income (loss) |
11,034 | 10,169 | 58,362 | 79,565 | | 79,565 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
(41,994 | ) | (11,411 | ) | (8,566 | ) | (61,971 | ) | | (61,971 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
979 | | | 979 | (979 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment expenses |
| (874 | ) | (105 | ) | (979 | ) | 979 | - | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (12,825 | ) | $ | (2,077 | ) | $ | 120,344 | $ | 105,442 | $ | | $ | 105,442 | ||||||||||
52
Table of Contents
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FOR THE QUARTERS AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
FOR THE QUARTERS AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
Quarter Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Variance % | 2010 | 2009 | Variance % | |||||||||||||||||||
EARNINGS DATA: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 81,221 | $ | 78,550 | 3.4 | % | $ | 231,400 | $ | 244,586 | -5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
43,061 | 45,659 | -5.7 | % | 126,801 | 145,488 | -12.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
38,160 | 32,891 | 16.0 | % | 104,599 | 99,098 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
4,100 | 4,400 | -6.8 | % | 12,214 | 11,250 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses |
34,060 | 28,491 | 19.5 | % | 92,385 | 87,848 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interest income |
(10,308 | ) | 16,322 | -163.2 | % | 3,587 | 79,565 | -95.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
32,705 | 20,485 | 59.7 | % | 80,950 | 61,971 | 30.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes |
(8,953 | ) | 24,328 | -136.8 | % | 15,022 | 105,442 | -85.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(2,358 | ) | 3,001 | -178.6 | % | (262 | ) | 8,452 | -103.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net Income (loss) |
(6,595 | ) | 21,327 | -130.9 | % | 15,284 | 96,990 | -84.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Less: Dividends on preferred stock |
(1,200 | ) | (1,201 | ) | -0.1 | % | (4,134 | ) | (3,602 | ) | 14.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Less: Deemed dividend on preferred stock beneficial conversion feature |
(22,711 | ) | | -100.0 | % | (22,711 | ) | | -100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Income available (loss) to common shareholders |
$ | (30,506 | ) | $ | 20,126 | -251.6 | % | $ | (11,561 | ) | $ | 93,388 | -112.4 | % | ||||||||||
PER SHARE DATA: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.67 | ) | $ | 0.83 | -181.2 | % | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 3.85 | -108.6 | % | ||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.67 | ) | $ | 0.83 | -181.2 | % | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 3.84 | -108.6 | % | ||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding |
45,354 | 24,303 | 86.6 | % | 34,823 | 24,284 | 43.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average potential common share-options |
128 | 65 | 96.9 | % | 105 | 17 | 517.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average shares and shares equivalents |
45,482 | 24,368 | 86.6 | % | 34,928 | 24,301 | 43.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Book value per common share |
$ | 14.01 | $ | 12.98 | 7.9 | % | $ | 14.01 | $ | 12.98 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Market price at end of period |
$ | 13.30 | $ | 12.70 | 4.7 | % | $ | 13.30 | $ | 12.70 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | -0.2 | % | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | -19.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared on common shares |
$ | 1,855 | $ | 972 | 90.8 | % | $ | 4,500 | $ | 2,916 | 54.3 | % | ||||||||||||
PERFORMANCE RATIOS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets (ROA) |
-0.33 | % | 1.32 | % | -125.1 | % | 0.28 | % | 1.98 | % | -85.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Return on average common equity (ROE) |
-19.28 | % | 28.12 | % | -168.6 | % | -3.40 | % | 51.61 | % | -106.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Equity-to-assets ratio |
9.69 | % | 6.00 | % | 61.6 | % | 9.69 | % | 6.00 | % | 61.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio |
65.93 | % | 50.82 | % | 29.7 | % | 60.67 | % | 51.31 | % | 18.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Expense ratio |
1.24 | % | 0.86 | % | 43.5 | % | 1.09 | % | 0.88 | % | 24.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest rate spread |
2.31 | % | 2.07 | % | 11.6 | % | 2.24 | % | 2.02 | % | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest rate margin |
2.22 | % | 2.17 | % | 2.3 | % | 2.18 | % | 2.15 | % | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||
53
Table of Contents
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Variance % | ||||||||||
PERIOD END BALANCES AND CAPITAL RATIOS: |
||||||||||||
Investments and loans |
||||||||||||
Investments securities |
$ | 4,339,836 | $ | 4,974,269 | -12.8 | % | ||||||
Loans and leases not covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC, net |
1,138,770 | 1,140,069 | -0.1 | % | ||||||||
Loans and leases covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC, net |
722,858 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Securities sold but not yet delivered |
317,209 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
$ | 6,518,673 | $ | 6,114,338 | 6.6 | % | |||||||
Deposits and borrowings |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 2,595,275 | $ | 1,745,501 | 48.7 | % | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,541,520 | 3,557,308 | -0.4 | % | ||||||||
Other borrowings |
452,907 | 472,849 | -4.2 | % | ||||||||
Securities purchased but not yet received |
| 413,359 | -100.0 | % | ||||||||
$ | 6,589,702 | $ | 6,189,017 | 6.5 | % | |||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||||||
Preferred stock |
68,000 | 68,000 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Common stock |
47,808 | 25,739 | 85.7 | % | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
498,486 | 213,445 | 133.5 | % | ||||||||
Legal surplus |
46,958 | 45,279 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||
Retained earnings |
59,845 | 77,584 | -22.9 | % | ||||||||
Treasury stock, at cost |
(17,116 | ) | (17,142 | ) | -0.2 | % | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
13,079 | (82,739 | ) | -115.8 | % | |||||||
$ | 717,060 | $ | 330,166 | 117.2 | % | |||||||
Capital ratios |
||||||||||||
Leverage capital |
8.99 | % | 6.52 | % | 37.9 | % | ||||||
Tier I risk-based capital |
24.00 | % | 18.79 | % | 27.7 | % | ||||||
Total risk-based capital |
25.02 | % | 19.84 | % | 26.1 | % | ||||||
Financial assets managed and owned |
||||||||||||
Trust assets managed |
$ | 2,120,833 | $ | 1,818,498 | 16.6 | % | ||||||
Broker-dealer assets gathered |
1,425,445 | 1,269,284 | 12.3 | % | ||||||||
Total assets managed |
$ | 3,546,278 | $ | 3,087,782 | 14.8 | % | ||||||
Assets owned |
$ | 7,403,057 | $ | 6,550,833 | 13.0 | % | ||||||
54
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Introduction
The Groups diversified mix of businesses and products generates both the interest income
traditionally associated with a banking institution and non-interest income traditionally
associated with a financial services institution (generated by such businesses as securities
brokerage, fiduciary services, investment banking, insurance and pension administration). Although
all of these businesses, to varying degrees, are affected by interest rate and financial markets
fluctuations and other external factors, the Groups commitment is to continue producing a balanced
and growing revenue stream.
From time to time, the Group uses certain non-GAAP measures of financial performance to supplement
the financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP. The Group presents non-GAAP measures
when its management believes that the additional information is useful and meaningful to investors.
Non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning and are therefore unlikely to be comparable
to similar measures presented by other companies. The presentation of non-GAAP measures is not
intended to be a substitute for, and should not be considered in isolation from, the financial
measures reported in accordance with GAAP. The Groups management has reported and discussed the
results of operations herein both on a GAAP basis and on a pre-tax operating income basis. The
Groups management believes that, given the nature of the items excluded from the definition of
pre-tax operating income, it is useful to state what the results of operations would have been
without them so that investors can see the financial trends from the Groups continuing business.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Groups loss to common shareholders totaled $30.5
million, or ($0.67) per basic and diluted earnings per common share. This compares to $20.1 million
in income available to common shareholders, or $0.83 per basic and diluted earnings per common
share for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The income available for common shareholders for
the quarter ended September 30, 2010 has been affected by a $22.7 million deemed dividend on the
Series C Preferred Stock, which corresponds to the difference between the $15.015 per share
conversion price and the market price of the common stock on April 30, 2010 ($16.72) the date the Preferred Stock was offered.
Highlights
| Greater proportion of interest income from loans. For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, interest income of $81.2 million increased 3.4% compared to the same period in 2009, as 88.2% growth from loans more than offset a 22.3% decline from investment securities due to lower yields and reduced size of the portfolio. Interest income from loans represented a record 42.3% of total interest income compared to 23.2% in the year ago quarter. Interest income included $16.7 million from acquired Eurobank loans for the three months. | |
| Deleveraged balance sheet. The Group paid off a 4.39%, $100 million repurchase agreement that matured August 16, 2010 and redeemed the $595 million remaining balance of its 0.88% note to the FDIC, which originated as part of the Eurobank transaction. As a result of these transactions, total investments declined to 58.6% of assets at September 30, 2010 compared to 75.9% at December 31, 2009, and borrowings declined to 60.6% of interest-bearing liabilities compared to 69.8%, respectively. | |
| Strong growth in commercial production. While total loan production and purchases increased 49.4%, to $103.4 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, from the same period in 2009, production of commercial loans and leases combined increased 194.3% to $31.0 million. To date for the year, commercial loans and lease production is up 102.3% to $73.1 million, representing 27.0% of total loan production and purchases, versus 15.7% for the year ago period. | |
| Continued growth of banking and wealth management revenues. These revenues totaled $11.4 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, up 54.2% from the same period in 2009. Bank service revenues increased 139.7%, primarily reflecting the former Eurobank commercial point of sale business and deposit fees. Mortgage banking activities increased 53.1% due in part to higher production, reflecting expanded market share. Year to date, total banking and wealth management revenues are up 33.0%, to $28.8 million, representing 23.8% of total net revenues versus 19.8% a year ago. | |
| Increased growth of wealth management assets. Total assets managed of $3.5 billion at September 30, 2010 grew 14.8% from December 31, 2009, with 16.6% growth of trust assets and 12.3% growth of broker-dealer assets. Growth is benefitting from improved market values as well as increased asset gathering from the Groups strong capital position in the local market. |
55
Table of Contents
| Continued growth of core retail deposits. Total retail deposits increased $505.4 million, to $1.9 billion from December 31, 2009, reflecting growth from both Group customers as the Group began to benefit from its larger and more strategically located network of 30 branches and core deposits assumed on the FDIC-assisted acquisition. Core retail deposits, which have grown sequentially nine quarters in a row, increased to 29.0% of interest bearing liabilities at September 30, 2010 compared to 24.3% in December 31, 2009. |
Other Highlights
| Net interest margin of 2.22% for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 increased 5 basis points from the same period in 2009. Higher yield from three months of former Eurobank loans and lower cost of funds were able to offset the decline in yield from investments. Cost of funds is expected to decline further in the fourth quarter as a result of the third quarter deleveraging. | |
| Non interest expenses of $32.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 were $12.2 million higher than in the same period in 2009. The third quarter included $10.2 million related to Eurobank. In late September, the Group closed nine former Eurobank branches and consolidated two Oriental branches into the 11 Eurobank branches retained. The Groups network now consists of 30 branches, most of them concentrated in greater San Juan. In late October, most former Eurobank Information Technology functions transferred to the Groups platform. These actions are expected to reduce Eurobank related expenses in the fourth quarter, and along with other steps, achieve 30-35% Eurobank cost savings by the start of 2011. | |
| Net credit losses (excluding loans covered under shared-loss agreements with the FDIC) of $2.5 million increased $1.5 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 from the same period in 2009 and total $5.8 million year to date, in line with the Groups previously stated expectations of $8-$9 million in 2010. Non-performing loans (NPLs) increased 6.1% from December 31, 2009. The Groups NPLs generally reflect the economic environment in Puerto Rico. The Group does not expect NPLs to result in significantly higher losses as most are well-collateralized residential mortgages with adequate loan-to-value ratios. | |
| Approximately 96% of the Groups investment portfolio consists of fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities or notes, guaranteed or issued by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA, and U.S. agency senior debt obligations, backed by a U.S. government sponsored entity or the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. |
Capital
| Total stockholders equity of $717.1 million increased $386.9 million from December 31, 2009, reflecting issuances of common and preferred stock, the net income for the nine-month period, and an improvement of approximately $95.8 million in the fair value of the investment securities portfolio. | |
| The Group continues to maintain regulatory capital ratios well above the requirements for a well-capitalized institution. At September 30, 2010, the Leverage Capital Ratio was 8.99%, Tier-1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio was 24.00%, and Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio was 25.02%. In addition, Tangible Common Equity to risk-weighted assets was 21.86%. |
Non-Operating Items
These included the following major items:
| Deemed dividend of $22.7 million related to the conversion of the Groups Mandatorily Convertible Non-Cumulative Non-Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, which raised a net $189 million in connection with the Eurobank acquisition, which was converted into 13.32 million shares of common stock on July 8, 2010. The deemed dividend did not affect total stockholders equity or book value per common share, but did reduce income per common share for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $22.7 million represents the intrinsic value between the conversion rate of $15.01 and the common stock closing price of $16.62 on April 30, 2010, the date the Preferred Stock was offered. | |
| Gain of $14.0 million on the sale of securities for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as the Group took further advantage of the low interest rate environment to lock in profits. For the quarter ended September 30, 2009 the Group had a $35.5 million gain on the sale of securities. |
56
Table of Contents
| Charges of $14.8 million in other-than-temporary impairment on the BALTA private label CMO during the quarter ended September 30, 2010. The other-than-temporary impairment was the result of increasingly conservative modeling that now takes into consideration the macro economic effect of the recent foreclosure moratorium in some states and other economic uncertainties. For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, other-than-temporary impairment on securities amounted to $8.3 million. | |
| Loss of $22.6 million on derivative activities for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. This reflected realized losses of $17.3 million due to the termination of forward-settle swaps with a notional amount of $1.25 billion. These terminations allowed the Group to enter into new forward-settle swap contracts for the same notional amount, while effectively reducing the interest rate of the pay-fixed side of such deals from an average rate of 2.45% to an average rate of 1.83%. The balance reflected an unrealized valuation loss of $4.9 million on the new swaps. These forward-settle swaps will enable the Group to fix, at 1.83%, the price of $1.25 billion in repurchase agreement funding ($900 million up for renewal in December 2011 and $350 million in May 2012) that currently have a blended cost of 4.40%. During the quarter ended September 30, 2009 the Group had a loss of $64 thousand on derivative activities. | |
| Accretion of $1.8 million of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset related to the former Eurobank loan portfolio. The estimated fair value of this asset was determined by discounting the projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on expected reimbursements, primarily for credit losses on covered assets. The time value of money incorporated into the present value computation is accreted over the shorter life of the loss sharing agreements or the holding period of the covered assets. |
57
Table of Contents
TABLE 1 QUARTERLY ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME AND CHANGES DUE TO VOLUME/RATE
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest | Average rate | Average balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
September | September | September | September | September | September | |||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
A TAX EQUIVALENT SPREAD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets |
$ | 81,221 | $ | 78,550 | 4.73 | % | 5.19 | % | $ | 6,868,971 | $ | 6,055,662 | ||||||||||||
Tax equivalent adjustment |
26,358 | 27,038 | 1.53 | % | 1.79 | % | | | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets tax equivalent |
107,579 | 105,588 | 6.26 | % | 6.98 | % | 6,868,971 | 6,055,662 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities |
43,061 | 45,659 | 2.42 | % | 3.12 | % | 7,116,702 | 5,855,924 | ||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income / spread |
64,518 | 59,929 | 3.84 | % | 3.86 | % | (247,731 | ) | 199,738 | |||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent interest rate margin |
3.76 | % | 3.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
B NORMAL SPREAD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
46,794 | 60,161 | 3.84 | % | 5.11 | % | 4,876,274 | 4,708,209 | ||||||||||||||||
Trading securities |
2 | 5 | 4.00 | % | 5.88 | % | 200 | 340 | ||||||||||||||||
Money market investments |
78 | 136 | 0.37 | % | 0.31 | % | 84,054 | 177,555 | ||||||||||||||||
46,874 | 60,302 | 3.78 | % | 4.94 | % | 4,960,528 | 4,886,104 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans not
covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
14,007 | 15,081 | 6.08 | % | 6.32 | % | 921,802 | 954,820 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
2,862 | 2,689 | 5.53 | % | 5.53 | % | 206,838 | 194,646 | ||||||||||||||||
Leasing |
93 | | 10.09 | % | 0.00 | % | 3,688 | | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
639 | 478 | 8.80 | % | 9.52 | % | 29,037 | 20,092 | ||||||||||||||||
17,601 | 18,248 | 6.06 | % | 6.24 | % | 1,161,365 | 1,169,558 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans secured by residential properties |
3,883 | | 7.90 | % | 0.00 | % | 196,510 | | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial and construction |
9,106 | | 8.64 | % | 0.00 | % | 421,448 | | ||||||||||||||||
Leasing |
3,103 | | 11.49 | % | 0.00 | % | 107,989 | | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
654 | | 12.38 | % | 0.00 | % | 21,131 | | ||||||||||||||||
16,746 | | 8.97 | % | 0.00 | % | 747,078 | | |||||||||||||||||
34,347 | 18,248 | 7.20 | % | 6.24 | % | 1,908,443 | 1,169,558 | |||||||||||||||||
81,221 | 78,550 | 4.73 | % | 5.19 | % | 6,868,971 | 6,055,662 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
| | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 165,524 | 46,234 | ||||||||||||||||
Now accounts |
3,646 | 5,046 | 2.05 | % | 3.01 | % | 712,072 | 671,454 | ||||||||||||||||
Savings and money market |
940 | 249 | 1.69 | % | 1.50 | % | 223,140 | 66,424 | ||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
8,094 | 8,695 | 2.32 | % | 3.41 | % | 1,393,430 | 1,019,343 | ||||||||||||||||
12,680 | 13,990 | 2.03 | % | 3.10 | % | 2,494,167 | 1,803,455 | |||||||||||||||||
Borrowings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
25,128 | 27,209 | 2.84 | % | 3.04 | % | 3,542,785 | 3,582,362 | ||||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB and other borrowings |
3,082 | 3,106 | 3.82 | % | 3.83 | % | 322,512 | 324,024 | ||||||||||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
1,021 | 1,021 | 3.86 | % | 3.71 | % | 105,818 | 110,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase money note issued to the FDIC |
823 | | 0.53 | % | 0.00 | % | 615,337 | | ||||||||||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
327 | 333 | 3.62 | % | 3.69 | % | 36,083 | 36,083 | ||||||||||||||||
30,381 | 31,669 | 2.63 | % | 3.13 | % | 4,622,535 | 4,052,469 | |||||||||||||||||
43,061 | 45,659 | 2.42 | % | 3.12 | % | 7,116,702 | 5,855,924 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income / spread |
$ | 38,160 | $ | 32,891 | 2.31 | % | 2.07 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate margin |
2.22 | % | 2.17 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Excess of average interest-earning assets over average interest-
bearing liabilities (excess of average interest-bearing liabilities
over average interest-earning assets) |
$ | (247,731 | ) | $ | 199,738 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities ratio |
96.52 | % | 103.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
C CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME DUE TO:
Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||
Interest Income: |
||||||||||||
Investments |
$ | 919 | $ | (14,347 | ) | $ | (13,428 | ) | ||||
Loans |
16,618 | (519 | ) | 16,099 | ||||||||
17,537 | (14,866 | ) | 2,671 | |||||||||
Interest Expense: |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
2,056 | (3,366 | ) | (1,310 | ) | |||||||
Repurchase agreements |
(301 | ) | (1,780 | ) | (2,081 | ) | ||||||
Other borrowings |
769 | 24 | 793 | |||||||||
2,524 | (5,122 | ) | (2,598 | ) | ||||||||
Net Interest Income |
$ | 15,013 | $ | (9,744 | ) | $ | 5,269 | |||||
58
Table of Contents
TABLE 1/A YEAR-TO-DATE ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME AND CHANGES DUE TO VOLUME/RATE
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest | Average rate | Average balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
September | September | September | September | September | September | |||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
A TAX EQUIVALENT SPREAD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets |
$ | 231,400 | $ | 244,586 | 4.82 | % | 5.32 | % | $ | 6,402,316 | $ | 6,135,733 | ||||||||||||
Tax equivalent adjustment |
75,625 | 80,690 | 1.57 | % | 1.75 | % | | | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets tax equivalent |
307,025 | 325,276 | 6.39 | % | 7.07 | % | 6,402,316 | 6,135,733 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities |
126,801 | 145,488 | 2.58 | % | 3.30 | % | 6,560,613 | 5,887,022 | ||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income / spread |
180,224 | 179,788 | 3.81 | % | 3.77 | % | (158,296 | ) | 248,711 | |||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent interest rate margin |
3.75 | % | 3.91 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
B NORMAL SPREAD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
149,750 | 187,770 | 4.22 | % | 5.24 | % | 4,731,213 | 4,781,345 | ||||||||||||||||
Trading securities |
5 | 933 | 3.06 | % | 3.65 | % | 218 | 34,128 | ||||||||||||||||
Money market investments |
263 | 554 | 0.39 | % | 0.55 | % | 88,930 | 134,341 | ||||||||||||||||
150,018 | 189,257 | 4.15 | % | 5.10 | % | 4,820,361 | 4,949,814 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans not
covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
42,656 | 46,170 | 6.14 | % | 6.30 | % | 926,513 | 977,032 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
8,592 | 7,677 | 5.69 | % | 5.43 | % | 201,364 | 188,425 | ||||||||||||||||
Leasing |
117 | | 5.26 | % | 0.00 | % | 2,963 | | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
1,567 | 1,482 | 8.03 | % | 9.66 | % | 26,023 | 20,462 | ||||||||||||||||
52,932 | 55,329 | 6.10 | % | 6.22 | % | 1,156,863 | 1,185,919 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans secured by residential properties |
6,493 | | 7.81 | % | 0.00 | % | 110,844 | | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial and construction |
15,350 | | 8.61 | % | 0.00 | % | 237,744 | | ||||||||||||||||
Leasing |
5,436 | | 11.28 | % | 0.00 | % | 64,271 | | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
1,171 | | 12.76 | % | 0.00 | % | 12,234 | | ||||||||||||||||
28,450 | | 8.92 | % | 0.00 | % | 425,092 | | |||||||||||||||||
81,382 | 55,329 | 6.86 | % | 6.22 | % | 1,581,955 | 1,185,919 | |||||||||||||||||
231,400 | 244,586 | 4.82 | % | 5.32 | % | 6,402,316 | 6,135,733 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
| | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 120,054 | 42,586 | ||||||||||||||||
Now accounts |
10,973 | 13,151 | 2.17 | % | 3.12 | % | 672,826 | 562,885 | ||||||||||||||||
Savings and money market |
2,074 | 615 | 1.67 | % | 1.38 | % | 165,988 | 59,382 | ||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
22,827 | 28,196 | 2.48 | % | 3.49 | % | 1,225,099 | 1,077,891 | ||||||||||||||||
35,874 | 41,962 | 2.19 | % | 3.21 | % | 2,183,967 | 1,742,744 | |||||||||||||||||
Borrowings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
75,900 | 90,937 | 2.84 | % | 3.28 | % | 3,566,354 | 3,696,862 | ||||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB and other borrowings |
9,147 | 9,277 | 3.78 | % | 3.75 | % | 322,507 | 329,899 | ||||||||||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
3,063 | 2,154 | 3.86 | % | 3.53 | % | 105,676 | 81,434 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase money note issued to the FDIC |
1,887 | | 0.73 | % | 0.00 | % | 346,027 | | ||||||||||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
930 | 1,158 | 3.44 | % | 4.28 | % | 36,083 | 36,083 | ||||||||||||||||
90,927 | 103,526 | 2.77 | % | 3.33 | % | 4,376,646 | 4,144,278 | |||||||||||||||||
126,801 | 145,488 | 2.58 | % | 3.30 | % | 6,560,613 | 5,887,022 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income / spread |
$ | 104,599 | $ | 99,098 | 2.24 | % | 2.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate margin |
2.18 | % | 2.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Excess of average interest-earning assets over average interest-
bearing liabilities (excess of average interest-bearing liabilities
over average interest-earning assets) |
$ | (158,296 | ) | $ | 248,711 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities ratio |
97.59 | % | 104.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
C CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME DUE TO:
Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||
Interest Income: |
||||||||||||
Investments |
$ | (4,950 | ) | $ | (34,289 | ) | $ | (39,239 | ) | |||
Loans |
27,094 | (1,041 | ) | 26,053 | ||||||||
22,144 | (35,330 | ) | (13,186 | ) | ||||||||
Interest Expense: |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
3,932 | (10,020 | ) | (6,088 | ) | |||||||
Repurchase agreements |
(3,210 | ) | (11,827 | ) | (15,037 | ) | ||||||
Other borrowings |
2,361 | 77 | 2,438 | |||||||||
3,083 | (21,770 | ) | (18,687 | ) | ||||||||
Net Interest Income |
$ | 19,061 | $ | (13,560 | ) | $ | 5,501 | |||||
59
Table of Contents
Net interest income is a function of the difference between rates earned on the Groups
interest-earning assets and rates paid on its interest-bearing liabilities (interest rate spread)
and the relative amounts of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (interest
rate margin). The Group constantly monitors the composition and re-pricing of its assets and
liabilities to maintain its net interest income at adequate levels.
For the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, net interest income amounted to
$38.2 million and $104.6 million, respectively, an increase of 16.0% and 5.6% from $32.9 million
and $99.0 million in the same periods of 2009. These increases reflect a 5.7% and 12.8% reduction
in interest expense for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, respectively,
primarily the result of a decrease of $5.1 million and $21.8 million in rate variance,
respectively, and an increase of $2.5 million and $3.1 million, respectively, in volume variance.
The increase of 3.4% in interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 was primarily the
result of a $17.5 million increase in volume variance, partially offset by a decrease of $14.9
million in rate variance. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, the 5.4% decrease in
interest income was primarily the result of a $35.3 million decrease in rate variance, partially
offset by a $22.1 million increase in volume variance.
Interest rate spread increased 24 basis points to 2.31% for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
from 2.07% in the September 30, 2009 quarter, and increased 22 basis points to 2.24% for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 from 2.02% for the same period in 2009. These increases
reflect a 70 basis points decrease in the average cost of funds to 2.42% in the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 from 3.12% in September 30, 2009 quarter, partially offset by a 46 basis point
decrease in the average yield of interest earning assets to 4.73% in the quarter ended September
30, 2010 from 5.19% in September 30, 2009 quarter; and a 72 basis point decrease in the average
cost of funds to 2.58% in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 from 3.30% for the year
ago period, partially offset by a 49 basis point decrease in the average yield of interest earning
assets to 4.82% in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 from 5.31% for the year ago
period, as further explained below.
For the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, the average balances of total
interest-earning assets were $6.869 billion and $6.402 billion, respectively, a 13.4% and 4.3%
increase from the same periods in 2009. The increase in the quarterly and year-to-date average
balance of interest-earning assets was mainly attributable to the contribution made to average
balances by covered loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition, which averaged $747.1 million
and $425.1 million, respectively, accompanied by a 1.5% increase in averaged investments, and
partially offset by a 0.7% decrease in average non-covered loans, on a linked-quarter basis, and a
2.6% and 2.5% decrease in averaged investments and non-covered loans, respectively, on a linked-
year-to-date basis. The decline in the average volume of non-covered mortgage loans listed in the
preceding table was principally influenced by lower origination activity. In December 2009 and
January 2010, the Group sold certain non-agency securities. Rather than reinvesting all of the
proceeds in the purchase of new, long-term securities, the Group built up its cash position.
Nevertheless, during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Group used some of this cash to
repay $100.0 million of securities sold under agreements to repurchase that matured on August 16,
2010. In addition, cash decreased from the previous quarter as a result of the repayment of the
Note issued to the FDIC prior to maturity. As of September 30, 2010, the Group had $142.9 million
in cash versus $277.1 million as of December 31, 2009 and $170.4 million as of September 30, 2009.
For the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, the average yield on
interest-earning assets was 4.73% and 4.82%, respectively, compared to 5.19% and 5.32% for the same
periods of last year. These decreases were mainly due to lower average yields in the investment
portfolio, mainly due to aforementioned sale transactions and higher cash positions, which were
partially offset by higher yields contributed by the acquired covered loan portfolio, as previously
mentioned.
Interest income on investments decreased 22.3% to $46.9 million and 20.7% to $150.0 million for the
quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $60.3 million and
$189.3 million for the same periods in 2009, reflecting the decrease in yield. The investment
portfolio yield decreased to 3.78% and 4.15% in the quarter and nine-month period ended September
30, 2010, versus 4.94% and 5.10% in the same periods last year. Interest income from loans
increased 88.2% to $34.3 million and 47.2% to $81.4 million for the quarter and nine-month period
ended September 30, 2010, respectively, mainly due to the contribution of loans acquired.
Considering covered loans, the loan portfolio yield increased to 7.20% and 6.86% in the quarter and
nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to 6.24% and 6.22% for the same
periods in 2009.
On April 30, 2010 the Bank acquired certain assets with a book value of $1.690 billion and a fair
value of $915.9 million and assumed certain deposits and other liabilities with a book value of
$731.9 million and a fair value of $739.0 million in the FDIC-assisted acquisition of former
Eurobank. Since the assets acquired were considerably higher than the liabilities assumed, it makes
the interest rate margin to be lower than the net interest income spread for the quarter and
nine-month period ended September 30, 2010.
60
Table of Contents
Interest expense decreased 5.7% and 12.8%, to $43.1 million and $126.8 million, for the quarter and
nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, respectively, from $45.7 million and $145.5 million for
the same periods of 2009. These decreases are due to a significant reduction in cost of funds,
which decreased 70 basis points on a linked-quarter basis, from 3.12% to 2.42%, and by 72 basis
points on a linked year-to-date basis, from 3.30% to 2.58%. Reduction in the cost of funds is
mostly due to a reduction in the rate paid on deposits, mainly due to the premium amortization on
certificates of deposit assumed in the FDIC-assisted acquisition, In addition, the reduction in
the cost of funds was also affected by the maturity of $100.0 million in securities sold under
agreements to repurchase that occurred in August 2010. For the quarter and nine-month period ended
September 30, 2010, the cost of deposits decreased by 107 basis points and 102 basis points, to
2.03% and 2.19%, respectively, compared to 3.10% and 3.21% for the same periods of 2009. The net
interest income also benefitted from a reduction in the interest expense with reductions of $15.0
million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and $6.1 million on deposits.
61
Table of Contents
TABLE 2 NON-INTEREST INCOME SUMMARY
FOR THE QUARTERS AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
FOR THE QUARTERS AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
Quarter Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Variance % | 2010 | 2009 | Variance % | |||||||||||||||||||
Wealth management revenues |
$ | 4,554 | $ | 3,764 | 21.0 | % | $ | 13,157 | $ | 10,163 | 29.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Banking service revenues |
3,414 | 1,424 | 139.7 | % | 8,030 | 4,330 | 85.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage banking activities |
3,418 | 2,232 | 53.1 | % | 7,555 | 7,191 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment banking revenues (losses) |
59 | | 100.0 | % | 93 | (4 | ) | 2425.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total banking and wealth
management revenues |
11,445 | 7,420 | 54.2 | % | 28,835 | 21,680 | 33.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total loss on other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
(14,739 | ) | (44,737 | ) | -67.1 | % | (39,674 | ) | (107,331 | ) | -47.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Portion of loss on securities recognized in other comprehensive income |
| 36,478 | -100.0 | % | 22,508 | 94,656 | -58.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on other-than-temporary impairments on securities |
(14,739 | ) | (8,259 | ) | 78.5 | % | (17,166 | ) | (12,675 | ) | 35.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of securities |
13,954 | 35,528 | -60.7 | % | 37,807 | 56,388 | -33.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
(22,580 | ) | (64 | ) | 35181.3 | % | (59,832 | ) | 19,778 | -402.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Early extinguishment of repurchase agreements |
| (17,551 | ) | -100.0 | % | | (17,551 | ) | -100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Trading securities |
4 | (505 | ) | -100.8 | % | 2 | 12,427 | -100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Bargain purchase from FDIC assisted acquisition |
| | 0.0 | % | 9,944 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustment on FDIC equity appreciation instrument |
| | 0.0 | % | 909 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Accretion of FDIC loss-share indemnification asset |
1,756 | | 100.0 | % | 3,314 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
(140 | ) | (278 | ) | -49.6 | % | (283 | ) | (576 | ) | -50.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Other |
(8 | ) | 31 | -125.8 | % | 57 | 94 | -39.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
(21,753 | ) | 8,902 | -344.4 | % | (25,248 | ) | 57,885 | -143.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total non-interest income (loss) |
$ | (10,308 | ) | $ | 16,322 | -163.2 | % | $ | 3,587 | $ | 79,565 | -95.5 | % | |||||||||||
62
Table of Contents
Non-interest income is affected by the amount of securities, derivatives and trading
transactions, the level of trust assets under management, transactions generated by the gathering
of financial assets by the securities broker-dealer subsidiary, the level of investment and
mortgage banking activities, and the fees generated from loans, deposit accounts, and insurance
activities. Non-interest loss totaled $10.3 million for the quarter and non-interest income totaled
$3.6 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of 163.2% and 95.5%
when compared to non-interest income of $16.3 million and $79.6 million during the same periods of
last year.
Wealth management revenues, consisting of commissions and fees from fiduciary activities, from
securities brokerage, and from insurance activities, increased 21.0%, to $4.6 million and 29.5% to
$13.2 million in the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, from $3.8 million and
$10.1 million in the same periods of 2009. Banking service revenues, consisting primarily of fees
generated by deposit accounts, electronic banking services, and customer services, increased 139.7%
to $3.4 million and 85.5% to $8.0 million in the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30,
2010, from $1.4 million and $4.4 million in the same periods of 2009. These increases are
attributable to increases in electronic banking service fees and the fees generated from the
customers of the former Eurobank banking business.
Income generated from mortgage banking activities increased 53.1% to $3.4 million and 5.1% to $7.6
million in the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, respectively, from $2.2
million and $7.2 million in the same periods of 2009, mainly the result of an increase in the sale
of conforming mortgage loans in the secondary market.
For the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, losses from securities,
derivatives, trading activities and other investment activities were
$23.4 million and $39.1
million respectively, compared to gains of $26.7 million and $76.0 million for the same periods of
2009. The decrease was mostly due to net losses of $22.6 million in derivatives during the quarter and
$59.8 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, compared with losses of $64
thousand and gains of $19.8 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2009.
Losses on derivative activities for the quarter and the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010
included realized losses of $24.7 million and $42.0 million, respectively, due to the termination
of forward-settle swaps with a notional amount of $900 million. These terminations allowed the
Group to enter into new forward-settle swap contracts for the same notional amount, and effectively
reduce the interest rate of the pay-fixed side of such deals from an average rate of 3.53% to an
average rate of 1.83%. The remaining losses mainly represent unrealized losses on new interest rate
swaps. The realization of these losses and the actual valuation results reversed the valuation
gains from the preceding nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 of $19.8 million.
Keeping with the Groups investment strategy, during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
there were certain sales of available-for-sale securities because the Group felt at the time of
such sales that gains could be realized while at the same time having good opportunities to invest
the proceeds in other investment securities with attractive yields and terms that would allow the
Group to continue to protect its net interest margin. Sale of securities available-for-sale, which
generated gains of $14.0 million for the quarter and $37.8 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2010, decreased 60.7% and 33.0% when compared to $35.5 million and $56.4 million for
the same periods a year ago. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, a gains on
sales of $2 thousand was recognized in trading securities, compared to gains on sales of $12.4
million in the previous year.
During the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 the Group recorded
other-than-temporary impairment losses of $14.7 million and $17.2 million, respectively, compared
to losses of $8.3 million and $12.7 million, for the same periods of 2009. During the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, the Group revised the assumption related to home-price appreciation values used
in the cash flow analysis of its non-agency mortgage-backed security. Such cash flow analysis is
used to determine the expected losses on the underlying collateral. The revision provided the Group
with more recent information on the real estate values of the securitys underlying collateral,
which had the effect of increasing the severity of the losses projected by the cash flow analysis.
63
Table of Contents
TABLE 3 NON-INTEREST EXPENSES SUMMARY
FOR THE QUARTERS AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
FOR THE QUARTERS AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
Quarter Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Variance % | 2010 | 2009 | Variance % | |||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
$ | 11,732 | $ | 7,882 | 48.8 | % | $ | 30,440 | $ | 23,626 | 28.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
5,620 | 3,747 | 50.0 | % | 13,815 | 10,994 | 25.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Professional and service fees |
5,480 | 2,459 | 122.9 | % | 11,552 | 7,461 | 54.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance |
1,651 | 1,273 | 29.7 | % | 5,218 | 5,560 | -6.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Taxes, other than payroll and income taxes |
1,611 | 834 | 93.2 | % | 3,759 | 2,129 | 76.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Advertising and business promotion |
1,275 | 1,097 | 16.2 | % | 3,339 | 3,329 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Electronic banking charges |
1,322 | 471 | 180.7 | % | 3,112 | 1,607 | 93.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Communication |
826 | 382 | 116.2 | % | 1,905 | 1,163 | 63.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loan servicing expenses |
443 | 397 | 11.6 | % | 1,321 | 1,167 | 13.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Clearing and wrap fees |
579 | 293 | 97.6 | % | 1,217 | 860 | 41.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Director and investors relations |
396 | 348 | 13.8 | % | 1,098 | 1,029 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
1,770 | 1,302 | 36.0 | % | 4,174 | 3,046 | 37.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total non-interest expenses |
$ | 32,705 | $ | 20,485 | 59.7 | % | $ | 80,950 | $ | 61,971 | 30.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Relevant ratios and data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio |
65.9 | % | 50.8 | % | 60.7 | % | 51.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Expense ratio |
1.2 | % | 0.9 | % | 1.1 | % | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits to non-interest expense |
35.9 | % | 38.5 | % | 37.6 | % | 38.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Compensation to total assets owned |
0.63 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average number of employees |
846 | 538 | 716 | 547 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average compensation per employee |
$ | 55.5 | $ | 58.6 | $ | 56.7 | $ | 57.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Assets owned per average employee |
$ | 8,751 | $ | 11,861 | $ | 10,339 | $ | 11,666 | ||||||||||||||||
64
Table of Contents
Non-interest expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 increased 59.7% to $32.7 million,
compared to $20.5 million for the same period of 2009. For the nine-month period ended September
30, 2010 non-interest expense reached $81.0 million representing an increase of 30.6% compared to
$62.0 million for the same period of 2009. The increase in non-interest expense is primarily driven
by higher compensation and employees benefits and by higher professional and service fees.
Compensation and employee benefits increased 48.8% to $11.7 million from $7.9 million in the
quarter ended September 30, 2010. The increase is mainly driven by the integration of the employees
of Eurobank since April 30, 2010. This factor represented an increase of approximately $3.1 million
in payroll for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. The increase against the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2009 is also affected by the integration of former Eurobanks employees.
Occupancy and equipment expense increased 50.0% to $5.6 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2010. The increase is mainly driven by the integration of branches of Eurobank since April 30,
2010. This factor represented an increase of approximately $2.0 million in occupancy and equipment
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. The increase against the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009 is also affected by the integration of former Eurobank branches.
Professional and service fees for the quarter increased 122.9% mainly due to servicing expenses
during the quarter for certain commercial and construction loans acquired from the FDIC-assisted
acquisition amounting to $2.4 million. The fluctuation for the nine-month period ended September
30, 2010 is also affected by one-time professional expenses amounting to approximately $1.2
million, as part of the FDIC assisted acquisition.
Insurance expenses increased from $1.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 to $1.7
million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. This increase is mainly due to a one-time credit
related to SAIF insurance; which was for the 2009 period. Insurance expenses decreased from $5.6
million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 to $5.2 million for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2010. This decrease is mainly due to the reduced re-assessment of the
FDIC due to lower overall risk categorization of the Bank.
Increases in taxes, other than payroll and income taxes for the quarter and nine-month period ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to same period of 2009, are principally due to increase in municipal
license tax, based on business volume and assets, which increased compared to previous year period.
The increase in overall business volume and assets is also related to the addition of new branches
and the assets acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition.
Increases in electronic banking charges for both the quarter and the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2010 against the same period of 2009, are mainly due to increase in point-of-sale
(POS) transactions, in addition to Eurobanks increased transactions as the result of the Groups
commercial POS cash management business.
The non-interest expense results reflect an efficiency ratio of 65.9% for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, compared to 50.8% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The efficiency
ratio measures how much of a companys revenue is used to pay operating expenses. The Group
computes its efficiency ratio by dividing non-interest expenses by the sum of its net interest
income and non-interest income, but excluding gains on sale of investments securities, derivatives
gains or losses, credit-related other-than-temporary impairment losses, and other income that may
be considered volatile in nature. Management believes that the exclusion of those items permit
greater comparability. Amounts presented as part of non-interest income that are excluded from the
efficiency ratio computation amounted to a loss of $17.1 million for quarter ended September 30,
2010 and gains of $8.9 million for quarter ended 2009, respectively.
65
Table of Contents
TABLE 4 ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES SUMMARY (NON-COVERED LOANS)
FOR THE QUARTERS AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
Nine-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended September 30, | Variance | September 30, | Variance | |||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | 2010 | 2009 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 28,002 | $ | 16,718 | 67.5 | % | $ | 23,272 | $ | 14,293 | 62.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
4,100 | 4,400 | -6.8 | % | 12,214 | 11,250 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(2,517 | ) | (1,037 | ) | 142.7 | % | (6,124 | ) | (5,652 | ) | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Recoveries |
55 | 95 | -42.1 | % | 278 | 285 | -2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 29,640 | $ | 20,176 | 46.9 | % | $ | 29,640 | $ | 20,176 | 46.9 | % | ||||||||||||
TABLE 5 NET CREDIT LOSSES STATISTICS:
FOR THE QUARTERS AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
Nine-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended September 30, | Variance | September 30, | Variance | |||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | 2010 | 2009 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
$ | (432 | ) | $ | (575 | ) | -24.9 | % | $ | (2,871 | ) | $ | (2,776 | ) | 3.4 | % | ||||||||
Recoveries |
| 31 | -100.0 | % | 76 | 70 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
(432 | ) | (544 | ) | -20.6 | % | (2,795 | ) | (2,706 | ) | 3.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Commercial |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(1,720 | ) | (78 | ) | 2105.1 | % | (2,220 | ) | (1,811 | ) | 22.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Recoveries |
10 | 8 | 25.0 | % | 32 | 44 | -27.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
(1,710 | ) | (70 | ) | 2342.9 | % | (2,188 | ) | (1,767 | ) | 23.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Consumer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(365 | ) | (384 | ) | -4.9 | % | (1,033 | ) | (1,065 | ) | -3.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Recoveries |
45 | 56 | -19.6 | % | 170 | 171 | -0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
(320 | ) | (328 | ) | -2.4 | % | (863 | ) | (894 | ) | -3.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Net credit losses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total charge-offs |
(2,517 | ) | (1,037 | ) | 142.7 | % | (6,124 | ) | (5,652 | ) | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Total recoveries |
55 | 95 | -42.1 | % | 278 | 285 | -2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
(2,462 | ) | (942 | ) | 161.4 | % | (5,846 | ) | (5,367 | ) | 8.9 | % | |||||||||||||
Net credit losses to average
loans outstanding (excluding loans
covered by FDIC shared-loss
agreements): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
0.19 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
3.31 | % | 0.14 | % | 1.45 | % | 1.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Leasing |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
4.41 | % | 6.53 | % | 4.42 | % | 5.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
0.85 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.67 | % | 0.60 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Recoveries to charge-offs |
2.19 | % | 9.16 | % | 4.54 | % | 5.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average loans (excluding loans
covered by FDIC shared-loss
agreements): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
$ | 921,802 | $ | 954,820 | -3.5 | % | $ | 926,513 | $ | 977,032 | -5.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Commercial |
206,838 | 194,646 | 6.3 | % | 201,364 | 188,425 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Leasing |
3,688 | | 100.0 | % | 2,963 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
29,037 | 20,092 | 44.5 | % | 26,023 | 20,462 | 27.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,161,365 | $ | 1,169,558 | -0.7 | % | $ | 1,158,513 | $ | 1,185,919 | -2.3 | % | ||||||||||||
66
Table of Contents
TABLE 6 ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES BREAKDOWN (NON-COVERED LOANS)
September 30, | December 31, | Variance | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Allowance for loans and lease losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
$ | 19,175 | $ | 15,044 | 27.5 | % | $ | 11,207 | ||||||||
Commercial |
8,504 | 7,112 | 19.6 | % | 7,485 | |||||||||||
Consumer |
589 | 864 | -31.8 | % | 1,155 | |||||||||||
Leasing |
216 | | 100.0 | % | | |||||||||||
Unallocated allowance |
1,156 | 252 | 358.7 | % | 329 | |||||||||||
$ | 29,640 | $ | 23,272 | 27.4 | % | $ | 20,176 | |||||||||
Allowance composition: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
64.7 | % | 64.6 | % | 55.5 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial |
28.7 | % | 30.6 | % | 37.1 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer |
2.0 | % | 3.7 | % | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||
Leasing |
0.7 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
Unallocated allowance |
3.9 | % | 1.1 | % | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Allowance coverage ratio at end of period applicable to: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
2.1 | % | 1.6 | % | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial |
3.9 | % | 3.6 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer |
1.9 | % | 3.8 | % | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||
Leasing |
3.6 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
Unallocated allowance to total loans and leases |
0.1 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
Total allowance to total loans (excluding loans covered by FDIC
shared-loss agreements) |
2.5 | % | 2.0 | % | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||
Other selected data and ratios: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance coverage ratio to: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-performing loans |
26.8 | % | 22.0 | % | 21.7 | % | ||||||||||
Non-mortgage non-performing loans |
204.9 | % | 144.3 | % | 211.4 | % | ||||||||||
The provision for loan and lease losses for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 totaled $4.1
million, a 6.8% decrease from the $4.4 million reported for the same quarter in 2009. For the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, the provision for loan and lease losses amounted to
$12.2 million or 8.6% higher than the $11.3 million recorded for the same period of 2009. This
increase is the result of higher non-performing loans mainly in the Groups mortgage and commercial
portfolios. Non-performing loans of $110.8 million at September 30, 2010, were 6.1% higher than the
$104.4 million at December 31, 2009 and 19% higher than the $93.1 million reported at September 30,
2009. Compared to December 31, 2009, non-performing mortgage loans increased 9.1% and
non-performing commercial loans decreased 11.6%.
Net credit losses for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 increased to $2.5 million when compared
to $942 thousand for the same period of 2009. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010,
net credit losses reached $5.8 million compared to $5.4 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009.
The Group maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that management considers
adequate to provide for probable losses based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks. The
Groups allowance for loan and lease losses policy provides for a detailed quarterly analysis of
probable losses. Based on an analysis of the credit quality and the composition of the Groups loan
portfolio, management determined that the provision for 2010 was adequate in order to maintain the
allowance for loan and lease losses at an adequate level.
67
Table of Contents
The Group follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance
for loan and lease losses to provide for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This methodology
includes the consideration of factors such as economic conditions, portfolio risk characteristics,
prior loss experience, and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans. The provision
for loan and lease losses charged to current operations is based on such methodology. Loan and
lease losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan and lease losses.
Larger commercial loans that exhibit potential or observed credit weaknesses are subject to
individual review and grading. Where appropriate, allowances are allocated to individual loans
based on managements estimate of the borrowers ability to repay the loan given the availability
of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal options available to the Group.
Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired. A loan is considered
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Group will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or as a practical
expedient, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral, if the
loan is collateral dependent. Loans are individually evaluated for impairment, except large groups
of small balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, and loans that
are recorded at fair value or at the lower of cost or market. The portfolios of mortgage and
consumer loans are considered homogeneous, and are evaluated collectively for impairment. For the
commercial loans portfolio, all loans over $250 thousand and over 90-days past due are evaluated
for impairment. At September 30, 2010, the total investment in impaired loans was $52.7 million,
compared to $26.3 million at December 31, 2009. Impaired commercial loans are measured based on the
fair value of collateral method, since all impaired loans during the period were collateral
dependant. The valuation allowance for impaired commercial loans amounted to approximately $524
thousand and $709 thousand at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. At September
30, 2010, the total investment in impaired mortgage loans was $27.9 million, compared to $10.7
million at December 31, 2009. Impairment on mortgage loans assessed as troubled debt restructuring
was measured using the present value of cash flows. The valuation allowance for impaired mortgage
loans amounted to approximately $2.0 million and $684 thousand at September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively.
The Group, using a rating system, applies an overall allowance percentage to each loan portfolio
category based on historical credit losses adjusted for current conditions and trends. This
calculation is the starting point for managements systematic determination of the required level
of the allowance for loan and lease losses. Other data considered in this determination includes:
the credit grading assigned to commercial loans, delinquency levels, loss trends and other
information including underwriting standards and economic trends.
Loan loss ratios and credit risk categories are updated quarterly and are applied in the context of
GAAP and the Joint Interagency Statement on the importance of depository institutions having
prudent, conservative, but not excessive loan loss allowances that fall within an acceptable range
of estimated losses. While management uses available information in estimating probable loan and
lease losses, future changes to the allowance may be necessary, based on factors beyond the Groups
control, such as factors affecting general economic conditions.
In the current quarter, the Group has not changed in any material respect its overall approach in
the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses. There have been no material changes
in criteria or estimation techniques as compared to prior periods that impacted the determination
of the current period allowance for loan and lease losses.
The loans covered by the FDIC shared loss agreement were recognized at fair value as of April 30,
2010, which included the impact of expected credit losses, and therefore, no allowance for credit
losses was recorded at the acquisition date. To the extent credit deterioration occurs after the
date of acquisition, the Group would record an allowance for loan and lease losses.
68
Table of Contents
TABLE 7 HIGHER RISK RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
Higher-Risk Residential Mortgage Loans* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High Loan-to-Value (LTV) Ratio Mortgages | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Junior Lien Mortgages | Interest Only Loans | LTV 90% to 100% | LTV Over 100% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value | Allowance | % | Value | Allowance | % | Value | Allowance | % | Value | Allowance | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delinquency: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Up to 90 days |
$ | 22,113 | $ | 219 | 0.99 | % | $ | 35,272 | $ | 1,018 | 2.89 | % | $ | 110,841 | $ | 1,503 | 1.36 | % | $ | 8,557 | $ | 136 | 1.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
91- 120 days |
496 | 10 | 2.03 | % | 114 | 7 | 5.88 | % | 1,051 | 22 | 2.06 | % | 130 | 3 | 2.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
121 - 180 days |
579 | 23 | 3.94 | % | 164 | 19 | 11.76 | % | 1,801 | 74 | 4.12 | % | 111 | 5 | 4.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
181- 365 days |
765 | 29 | 3.80 | % | 1,705 | 201 | 11.76 | % | 4,175 | 235 | 5.63 | % | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Over 365 days |
1,780 | 150 | 8.44 | % | 4,001 | 1,059 | 26.46 | % | 8,258 | 1,066 | 12.91 | % | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 25,732 | $ | 431 | 1.68 | % | $ | 41,256 | $ | 2,303 | 5.58 | % | $ | 126,126 | $ | 2,900 | 2.30 | % | $ | 8,799 | $ | 143 | 1.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total loans not
covered by FDIC shared-loss
agreements |
2.26 | % | 3.62 | % | 11.08 | % | 0.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinanced or Modified Loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount |
$ | 1,745 | $ | 22 | 1.27 | % | $ | | $ | | | $ | 8,909 | $ | 100 | 1.13 | % | $ | 2,107 | $ | 26 | 1.26 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage
of Higher-Risk Loan Category |
6.78 | % | | 7.06 | % | 23.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Loan-to-Value: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under 70% |
$ | 19,611 | $ | 355 | 1.81 | % | $ | 3,810 | $ | 425 | 11.17 | % | $ | | $ | | | $ | | $ | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70%- 79% |
3,016 | 39 | 1.31 | % | 7,714 | 388 | 5.03 | % | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80% - 89% |
2,120 | 20 | 0.92 | % | 12,134 | 651 | 5.36 | % | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90% - 100% |
985 | 17 | 1.78 | % | 15,096 | 765 | 5.07 | % | 126,126 | 2,900 | 2.30 | % | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Over 100% |
| | | 2,502 | 74 | 2.94 | % | | | | 8,799 | 143 | 1.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 25,732 | $ | 431 | 1.68 | % | $ | 41,256 | $ | 2,303 | 5.58 | % | $ | 126,126 | $ | 2,900 | 2.30 | % | $ | 8,799 | $ | 143 | 1.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
* | Loans may be included in more than one higher-risk loan category |
69
Table of Contents
TABLE 8 NON-PERFORMING NON-COVERED ASSETS
September 30, | December 31, | % | September 30, | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Variance | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Non-performing assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-accruing |
||||||||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR) loans |
$ | 318 | $ | 214 | 48.6 | % | $ | | ||||||||
Other loans |
59,235 | 56,854 | 4.2 | % | 46,794 | |||||||||||
Accruing |
||||||||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR) loans |
3,902 | 443 | 780.8 | % | | |||||||||||
Other loans |
47,297 | 46,860 | 0.9 | % | 46,300 | |||||||||||
Total non-performing loans |
110,752 | 104,371 | 6.1 | % | 93,094 | |||||||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
13,765 | 9,347 | 47.3 | % | 8,319 | |||||||||||
$ | 124,517 | $ | 113,718 | 9.5 | % | $ | 101,413 | |||||||||
TABLE
9 NON-PERFORMING NON-COVERED LOANS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
September 30, | December 31, | Variance | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Non-performing loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
$ | 96,286 | $ | 88,238 | 9.1 | % | $ | 83,551 | ||||||||
Commercial |
13,862 | 15,688 | -11.6 | % | 8,792 | |||||||||||
Consumer |
604 | 445 | 35.7 | % | 751 | |||||||||||
Leasing |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 110,752 | $ | 104,371 | 6.1 | % | $ | 93,094 | ||||||||
Non-performing loans composition percentages: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
86.9 | % | 84.5 | % | 89.8 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial, mainly real estate |
12.5 | % | 15.0 | % | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer |
0.6 | % | 0.5 | % | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||
Total |
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||
Non-performing loans to: |
||||||||||||||||
Total loans (excluding loans covered by FDIC shared-loss
agreements) |
9.48 | % | 8.97 | % | 5.69 | % | 7.94 | % | ||||||||
Total assets (excluding assets covered by FDIC shared-loss
agreements) |
1.66 | % | 1.59 | % | 4.40 | % | 1.46 | % | ||||||||
Total capital |
15.50 | % | 31.61 | % | -50.98 | % | 24.33 | % | ||||||||
Total non-performing loans as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 amounting to $110.8
million and $104.4 million do not consider loans classified as current and modified under troubled
debt restructuring programs. Total investment in mortgage loans with troubled debt restructuring
amounted to $27.9 million as of September 30, 2010 and $10.7 million as of December 31, 2009. Out
of these amounts, a total of $23.9 million and $9.7 million, respectively, were not included in the
aforementioned non-performing loan amounts because the loans were current in their payment
schedules. Also, for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31,
2009 a total of $5.0 million and $436,000, respectively, in commercial loans have been modified of
which $4.7 million and $106,000 are not considered in the non-performing loan amounts because the
loans are current.
70
Table of Contents
Detailed information concerning each of the items that comprise non-performing assets
follows:
| Mortgage loans well collateralized and in process of collection are placed on a non-accrual basis when they become 365 days or more past due and are written-down, if necessary, based on the specific evaluation of the collateral underlying the loan. At September 30, 2010, the Groups non-performing mortgage loans totaled $96.3 million (86.9% of the Groups non-performing loans), a 9.1% increase from the $88.2 million(84.6% of the Groups non-performing loans) reported at December 31, 2009. Non-performing loans in this category are primarily residential mortgage loans. | |
| Commercial loans are placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days or more past due and are written-down, if necessary, based on the specific evaluation of the underlying collateral, if any. At September 30, 2010, the Groups non-performing commercial loans amounted to $13.9 million (12.5% of the Groups non-performing loans), an 11.6% decrease when compared to non-performing commercial loans of $15.7 million reported at December 31, 2009 (15.0% of the Groups non-performing loans). Most of this portfolio is collateralized by commercial real estate properties. | |
| Consumer loans are placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days past due and written-off when payments are delinquent 120 days in personal loans and 180 days in credit cards and personal lines of credit. At September 30, 2010, the Groups non-performing consumer loans amounted to $604 thousand (0.5% of the Groups total non-performing loans), a 35.7% increase from the $445 thousand reported at December 31, 2009 (0.4% of total non-performing loans). | |
| Foreclosed real estate is initially recorded at the lower of the related loan balance or fair value less cost to sell as of the date of foreclosure. Any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the property is charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Subsequently, any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value less disposition cost is charged to operations. Net losses on the sale of foreclosed real estate for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 amounted to $140 thousand compared to $278 thousand in the quarter ended September 30, 2009. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, net losses on foreclosed real estate amounted to $283 thousand compared to $576 thousand for the same period of 2009. |
71
Table of Contents
TABLE 10 ASSETS SUMMARY AND COMPOSITION
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, | December 31, | Variance | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Investments: |
||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
$ | 3,509,126 | $ | 2,764,172 | 27.0 | % | $ | 2,601,515 | ||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
301,550 | 1,007,091 | -70.1 | % | 695,912 | |||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
63,246 | 446,037 | -85.8 | % | 457,216 | |||||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
194,427 | 286,509 | -32.1 | % | 302,502 | |||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
137,890 | 346,103 | -60.2 | % | 229,760 | |||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
42,443 | 38,383 | 10.6 | % | 141,259 | |||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
68,406 | 65,364 | 4.7 | % | 64,462 | |||||||||||
FHLB stock |
22,496 | 19,937 | 12.8 | % | 19,937 | |||||||||||
Other investments |
252 | 673 | -62.6 | % | 189 | |||||||||||
4,339,836 | 4,974,269 | -12.8 | % | 4,512,752 | ||||||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable |
1,136,978 | 1,136,080 | 0.1 | % | 1,145,555 | |||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
(29,640 | ) | (23,272 | ) | 27.4 | % | (20,176 | ) | ||||||||
Loans receivable, net |
1,107,338 | 1,112,808 | -0.5 | % | 1,125,379 | |||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
31,432 | 27,261 | 15.3 | % | 26,213 | |||||||||||
Total loans not covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC, net |
1,138,770 | 1,140,069 | -0.1 | % | 1,151,592 | |||||||||||
Total loans covered under shared loss agreements with the FDIC |
722,858 | | 100.0 | % | | |||||||||||
Total loans, net |
1,861,628 | 1,140,069 | 63.3 | % | 1,151,592 | |||||||||||
Securities sold but not yet delivered |
317,209 | | 100.0 | % | 417,280 | |||||||||||
Total securities and loans |
6,518,673 | 6,114,338 | 6.6 | % | 6,081,624 | |||||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
89,703 | 247,691 | -63.8 | % | 141,198 | |||||||||||
Money market investments |
53,233 | 29,432 | 80.9 | % | 29,245 | |||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
30,644 | 33,656 | -8.9 | % | 39,970 | |||||||||||
Deferred tax asset, net |
30,650 | 31,685 | -3.3 | % | 26,590 | |||||||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
17,125 | 19,775 | -13.4 | % | 20,202 | |||||||||||
FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset |
562,364 | | 100.0 | % | | |||||||||||
Core deposit intangible |
1,363 | | 100.0 | % | | |||||||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
33,087 | 9,347 | 254.0 | % | 8,319 | |||||||||||
Servicing asset |
9,647 | 7,120 | 35.5 | % | 6,135 | |||||||||||
Other assets |
56,568 | 57,789 | -2.1 | % | 27,763 | |||||||||||
Total other assets |
884,384 | 436,495 | 102.6 | % | 299,422 | |||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,403,057 | $ | 6,550,833 | 13.0 | % | $ | 6,381,046 | ||||||||
Investments portfolio composition: |
||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
80.8 | % | 55.5 | % | 57.8 | % | ||||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
6.9 | % | 20.2 | % | 15.4 | % | ||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
1.5 | % | 9.0 | % | 10.1 | % | ||||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
4.5 | % | 5.8 | % | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
3.2 | % | 7.0 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
1.0 | % | 0.8 | % | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
1.6 | % | 1.3 | % | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||
FHLB stock |
0.5 | % | 0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
72
Table of Contents
At September 30, 2010, the Groups total assets amounted to $7.403 billion, an increase of
13.0% when compared to $6.551 billion at December 31, 2009, and interest-earning assets reached
$6.519 billion, up 6.6%, versus $6.114 billion at December 31, 2009.
Investments principally consist of money market instruments, U.S. government and agency bonds,
mortgage-backed securities and Puerto Rico government and agency bonds. At September 30, 2010, the
investment portfolio decreased 12.8% from $4.974 billion in December 31, 2009 to $4.340 billion.
This decrease is mostly due to a decrease of $705.5 million or 70.1% in U.S. Government sponsored
agency bonds, a decrease of $382.8 million or 85.8% in non-agency collateralized mortgage
obligations, a decrease of $208.2 million or 60.2% in GNMA certificates and a decrease of $92.1
million or 32.1% in collateralized mortgage obligations issued by US Government sponsored agencies,
partially offset by an increase of $745.0 million or 27.0% in FMNA and FHLMC certificates, when
compared to December 31, 2009.
The Groups loan portfolio is mainly comprised of residential loans, home equity loans, commercial
loans collateralized by mortgages on real estate located in Puerto Rico, and leases, the latter
were added as part of the recent FDIC-assisted acquisition. At September 30, 2010, the Groups loan
portfolio, the second largest category of the Groups interest-earning assets, amounted to $1.862
billion, an increase of 63.3% when compared to the $1.140 billion at December 31, 2009. The loan
portfolio increase was mainly attributable to the $790.2 million in Eurobank loans acquired in the
Eurobanks FDIC-assisted acquisition. At September 30, 2010, the balance of these loans amounted to
$723.0 million. The fair values initially assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
were preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the
acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values became available. Preliminary
composition of the loans acquired, their respective unpaid principal balances, and the fair value
reflecting preliminary measurement period adjustments are reflected in the table below:
At April 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Fair | |||||||||||||||
Principal | Value | Fair | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance | Adjustment | Value | Mark | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Covered loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans secured by residential properties |
$ | 387,483 | $ | (179,388 | ) | $ | 208,095 | -46.30 | % | |||||||
Construction secured by residential properties |
87,709 | (68,544 | ) | 19,165 | -78.15 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial and other construction |
865,420 | (454,410 | ) | 411,010 | -52.51 | % | ||||||||||
Leasing |
160,492 | (34,841 | ) | 125,651 | -21.71 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer |
35,312 | (12,055 | ) | 23,257 | -34.14 | % | ||||||||||
1,536,416 | (749,238 | ) | 787,178 | -48.77 | % | |||||||||||
Non-covered loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Credit cards |
4,275 | (1,289 | ) | 2,986 | -30.15 | % | ||||||||||
Total loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction |
$ | 1,540,691 | $ | (750,527 | ) | $ | 790,164 | -48.71 | % | |||||||
The mortgage loan portfolio amounted to $918.7 million or 80.7% of the non-covered loan portfolio
as of September 30, 2010, compared to $946.2 million or 83.0% of the non-covered loan portfolio at
December 31, 2009. Mortgage production and purchases of $68.4 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 increased 21.7%, from $56.2 million, when compared to the quarter ended
September 30, 2009. The Group sells most of its conforming mortgages in the secondary market,
retaining servicing rights.
The second largest component of the Groups loan portfolio is commercial loans. At September 30,
2010, the commercial loan portfolio totaled $217.3 million (19.1% of the Groups total non-covered
loan portfolio), in comparison to $197.8 million at December 31, 2009 (17.3% of the Groups total
non-covered loan portfolio). The increase of $19.5 million in the portfolio as compared to December
31, 2009 is mainly related to the origination of new credit relationships. Commercial loan
production increased 150.6% to $26.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 from $10.5
million in the same period of 2009.
The consumer loan portfolio totaled $30.8 million (2.7% of total non-covered loan portfolio at
September 30, 2010), in comparison to $22.9 million at December 31, 2009 (2.0% total non-covered
loan portfolio at such date).
73
Table of Contents
TABLE 11 LIABILITIES SUMMARY AND COMPOSITION
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, | December 31, | Variance | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
$ | 168,590 | $ | 73,548 | 129.2 | % | $ | 73,097 | ||||||||
Now accounts |
719,401 | 619,947 | 16.0 | % | 702,397 | |||||||||||
Savings and money market accounts |
234,484 | 86,791 | 170.2 | % | 66,710 | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
1,467,182 | 961,344 | 52.6 | % | 1,068,777 | |||||||||||
2,589,657 | 1,741,630 | 48.7 | % | 1,910,981 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
5,618 | 3,871 | 45.1 | % | 6,924 | |||||||||||
2,595,275 | 1,745,501 | 48.7 | % | 1,917,905 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings: |
||||||||||||||||
Short term borrowings |
29,959 | 49,179 | -39.1 | % | 35,328 | |||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,541,520 | 3,557,308 | -0.4 | % | 3,557,086 | |||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
281,753 | 281,753 | 0.0 | % | 281,741 | |||||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
105,112 | 105,834 | -0.7 | % | 105,112 | |||||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
36,083 | 36,083 | 0.0 | % | 36,083 | |||||||||||
3,994,427 | 4,030,157 | -0.9 | % | 4,015,350 | ||||||||||||
Total deposits and borrowings |
6,589,702 | 5,775,658 | 14.1 | % | 5,933,255 | |||||||||||
FDIC net settlement payable |
41,601 | | 100.0 | % | | |||||||||||
Derivative liability |
8,289 | | 100.0 | % | 690 | |||||||||||
Securities and loans purchased but not yet received |
| 413,359 | -100.0 | % | 30,945 | |||||||||||
Other liabilities |
46,405 | 31,650 | 46.6 | % | 33,587 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 6,685,997 | $ | 6,220,667 | 7.5 | % | $ | 5,998,477 | ||||||||
Deposits portfolio composition percentages: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
6.5 | % | 4.2 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||
Now accounts |
27.8 | % | 35.6 | % | 36.8 | % | ||||||||||
Savings accounts |
9.1 | % | 5.0 | % | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
56.6 | % | 55.2 | % | 55.9 | % | ||||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Borrowings portfolio composition percentages: |
||||||||||||||||
Short term borrowings |
0.8 | % | 1.2 | % | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
88.6 | % | 88.3 | % | 88.6 | % | ||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
7.1 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
2.6 | % | 2.6 | % | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
0.9 | % | 0.9 | % | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
||||||||||||||||
Amount outstanding at year-end |
$ | 3,541,520 | $ | 3,557,308 | $ | 3,557,086 | ||||||||||
Daily average outstanding balance |
$ | 3,566,354 | $ | 3,659,442 | $ | 3,696,862 | ||||||||||
Maximum outstanding balance at any month-end |
$ | 3,566,588 | $ | 3,762,353 | $ | 3,779,627 | ||||||||||
74
Table of Contents
At September 30, 2010, the Groups total liabilities reached $6.686 billion, 7.5% higher than
the $6.221 billion reported at December 31, 2009. This increase is mostly due to an increase of
$849.8 million in deposits, resulting from the FDIC-assisted acquisition. Deposits and borrowings,
the Groups funding sources, amounted to $6.590 billion at September 30, 2010 versus $5.776 billion
at December 31, 2009, a 14.1% increase. Borrowings represented 60.6% of interest-bearing
liabilities and deposits represented 39.4%. The increase was partially offset by securities
purchased but not yet received at December 31, 2009 amounting to $413.4 million compared to none at
September 30, 2010.
Borrowings consist mainly of funding sources through the use of repurchase agreements, FHLB
advances, FDIC-guaranteed term notes, subordinated capital notes, and other borrowings. At
September 30, 2010, borrowings amounted to $3.994 billion, 0.9% lower than the $4.030 billion
recorded at December 31, 2009. Repurchase agreements as of September 30, 2010 amounted to $3.542
billion and decreased as compared to December 31, 2009. The decrease is mainly due to the maturity
and pay off of a repurchase agreement in August 2010 amounting to $100.0 million.
As part of the FDIC-assisted acquisition, the Bank issued to the FDIC a purchase money promissory note
(the Note) in the amount of $715.5 million. The Note was secured by the loans (other than certain
consumer loans) acquired under the agreement and all proceeds derived from such loans. The entire
outstanding principal balance of the Note was due one year from issuance, or such earlier date as
such amount became due and payable pursuant to the terms of the Note. The Bank paid interest
in arrears on the Note at the annual rate of 0.881% on the 25th of each month or, if such day was
not a business day, the next succeeding business day, commencing June 25, 2010, on
the outstanding principal amount of the Note. Interest was calculated on the
basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. On September 27, 2010, the Group made
the strategic decision to repay the Note prior to maturity. At the time of repayment the Note had
an outstanding principal balance of $595.0 million. For the cancelation of the Note, the Group used
approximately $200.0 million of proceeds from the sale of available for sale securities, brokered
certificates of deposit amounting to $134.7 million, short-term repurchase agreements amounting to
$85.0 million, and $175.3 million of cash.
The Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system functions as a source of credit for financial
institutions that are members of a regional FHLB. As a member of the FHLB, the Group can obtain
advances from the FHLB, secured by the FHLB stock owned by the Group, as well as by certain of the
Groups mortgage loans and investment securities. Advances from FHLB amounted to $281.8 million as
of September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009. These advances mature from May 2012 through May 2014.
The Groups banking subsidiary issued in March 2009 $105.0 million in notes guaranteed under the
FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. These notes are due on March 16, 2012, bear interest at
a 2.75% fixed rate, and are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Interest on
the note is payable on the 16th of each March and September, beginning September 16, 2009. Shortly
after issuance of the notes, the Group paid $3.2 million (equivalent to an annual fee of 100 basis
points) to the FDIC to maintain the FDIC guarantee coverage until the maturity of the notes. This
cost has been deferred and is being amortized over the term of the notes. The total cost of the
notes for 2009, including the amount of the debt issuance costs, was 3.58%.
At September 30, 2010, deposits, the second largest category of the Groups interest-bearing
liabilities reached $2.595 billion, up 48.7% from $1.746 billion at December 31, 2009. Brokered
deposits increased $74.8 million or 36.8% to $278.0 million. This decrease was driven by $134.7
million in new brokered deposits issued during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
Stockholders Equity
On March 19, 2010, the Group completed an underwritten public offering of 8,740,000 shares of its
common stock. The offering resulted in net proceeds of $94.5 million after deducting offering
costs. The net proceeds of this offering were intended for general corporate purposes, which
included funding organic acquisition and acquisition growth opportunities, including the
participation in government assisted transactions in Puerto Rico. It also contributed a portion of
the net proceeds in the form of capital to the Groups banking subsidiary, which used such amount
to bolster its regulatory capital needs and general corporate purposes.
75
Table of Contents
On April 30, 2010, the Group issued 200,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, through a private
placement. The Series C Preferred Stock had a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. At a
special meeting of shareholders of the Group held on June 30, 2010, the majority of the
shareholders approved the issuance of 13,320,000 shares of the Groups common stock upon the
conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock, which converted on July 8, 2010 at a conversion price
of $15.015 per share.
The difference between the $15.015 per share conversion price and the market price of the common
stock on April 30, 2010 ($16.72) is considered a beneficial conversion feature. Such feature
amounted to $22.7 million at September 30, 2010 and was recorded as a preferred stock dividend.
At September 30, 2010, the Groups total stockholders equity was $717.1 million, a 117.2%
increase, when compared to $330.2 million at December 31, 2009. This increase reflects the
aforementioned issuance of stock, the net income for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2010, and an improvement of approximately $95.8 million in the fair value of the investment
securities portfolio.
The Group maintains capital ratios in excess of regulatory requirements. At September 30, 2010,
Tier I Leverage Capital Ratio was 8.99% (2.25 times the requirement of 4.00%), Tier I Risk-Based
Capital Ratio was 24.00% (6.00 times the requirement of 4.00%), and Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio
was 25.02% (3.13 times the requirement of 8.00%).
76
Table of Contents
The following are the consolidated capital ratios of the Group at September 30, 2010 and 2009,
and December 31, 2009:
TABLE 12 CAPITAL, DIVIDENDS AND STOCK DATA
(In thousands, except for per share data)
September 30, | December 31, | Variance | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Capital data: |
||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
$ | 717,060 | $ | 330,166 | 117.2 | % | $ | 382,569 | ||||||||
Regulatory Capital Ratios data: |
||||||||||||||||
Leverage Capital Ratio |
8.99 | % | 6.52 | % | 39.0 | % | 7.69 | % | ||||||||
Minimum Leverage Capital Ratio Required |
4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||
Actual Tier I Capital |
$ | 708,869 | $ | 414,702 | 72.4 | % | $ | 496,541 | ||||||||
Minimum Tier I Capital Required |
$ | 315,235 | $ | 254,323 | 24.0 | % | $ | 258,445 | ||||||||
Excess over regulatory requirement |
$ | 393,634 | $ | 160,379 | 149.0 | % | $ | 238,096 | ||||||||
Tier I Risk-Based Capital Ratio |
24.00 | % | 18.79 | % | 28.5 | % | 15.81 | % | ||||||||
Minimum Tier I Risk-Based Capital Ratio Required |
4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||
Actual Tier I Risk-Based Capital |
$ | 708,869 | $ | 414,702 | 72.4 | % | $ | 496,541 | ||||||||
Minimum Tier I Risk-Based Capital Required |
$ | 118,134 | $ | 88,295 | 34.1 | % | $ | 125,657 | ||||||||
Excess over regulatory requirement |
$ | 590,734 | $ | 326,407 | 82.7 | % | $ | 370,884 | ||||||||
Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 2,953,361 | $ | 2,207,383 | 34.1 | % | $ | 3,141,420 | ||||||||
Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio |
25.02 | % | 19.84 | % | 26.8 | % | 16.45 | % | ||||||||
Minimum Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio Required |
8.00 | % | 8.00 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||
Actual Total Risk-Based Capital |
$ | 739,062 | $ | 437,975 | 70.1 | % | $ | 516,717 | ||||||||
Minimum Total Risk-Based Capital Required |
$ | 236,269 | $ | 176,591 | 34.1 | % | $ | 251,314 | ||||||||
Excess over regulatory requirement |
$ | 502,793 | $ | 261,384 | 94.4 | % | $ | 265,403 | ||||||||
Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 2,953,361 | $ | 2,207,383 | 34.1 | % | $ | 3,141,420 | ||||||||
Tangible common equity (common equity less goodwill) to
total assets |
8.72 | % | 3.97 | % | 119.6 | % | 4.90 | % | ||||||||
Tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets |
21.86 | % | 11.79 | % | 85.0 | % | 9.95 | % | ||||||||
Total equity to total assets |
9.69 | % | 5.04 | % | 92.3 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||||
Total equity to risk-weighted assets |
24.28 | % | 14.96 | % | 61.9 | % | 12.18 | % | ||||||||
Stock data: |
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding common shares, net of treasury |
46,317 | 24,235 | 91.1 | % | 24,232 | |||||||||||
Book value per common share |
$ | 14.01 | $ | 10.82 | 29.5 | % | $ | 12.98 | ||||||||
Market price at end of period |
$ | 13.30 | $ | 10.80 | 23.1 | % | $ | 12.70 | ||||||||
Market capitalization at end of period |
$ | 616,016 | $ | 261,738 | 135.4 | % | $ | 307,746 | ||||||||
Nine-Month Period Ended |
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | Variance | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | ||||||||||||||
Common dividend data: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
$ | 4,499 | $ | 2,916 | 54.3 | % | ||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | -0.3 | % | ||||||||||
Payout ratio |
-29.35 | % | 3.13 | % | -1037.7 | % | ||||||||||
Dividend yield |
1.20 | % | 1.26 | % | -4.5 | % | ||||||||||
77
Table of Contents
The following provides the high and low prices and dividend per share of the Groups common
stock for each quarter of the last three years:
Cash | ||||||||||||
Price | Dividend | |||||||||||
High | Low | Per share | ||||||||||
2010 |
||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 |
$ | 14.45 | $ | 12.13 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
June 30, 2010 |
$ | 16.72 | $ | 12.49 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
March 31, 2010 |
$ | 14.09 | $ | 10.00 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
2009 |
||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
$ | 13.69 | $ | 9.43 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
September 30, 2009 |
$ | 15.41 | $ | 7.48 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
June 30, 2009 |
$ | 11.27 | $ | 4.88 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
March 31, 2009 |
$ | 7.38 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
2008 |
||||||||||||
December 31, 2008 |
$ | 18.56 | $ | 5.37 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
September 30, 2008 |
$ | 20.99 | $ | 14.21 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
June 30, 2008 |
$ | 20.57 | $ | 14.26 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
March 31, 2008 |
$ | 23.28 | $ | 12.79 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
The Bank is considered well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action. The table below shows the Banks regulatory capital ratios at September 30, 2010 and 2009,
and at December 31, 2009:
September 30, | December 31, | Variance | September 30, | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | % | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Oriental Bank and Trust Regulatory Capital Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||
Total Tier I Capital to Total Assets |
8.68 | % | 5.78 | % | 51.4 | % | 6.99 | % | ||||||||
Actual Tier I Capital |
$ | 671,522 | $ | 359,339 | 88.5 | % | $ | 438,796 | ||||||||
Minimum Capital Requirement (4%) |
$ | 309,548 | $ | 248,671 | 24.6 | % | $ | 250,967 | ||||||||
Minimum to be well capitalized (5%) |
$ | 386,934 | $ | 310,839 | 24.6 | % | $ | 313,709 | ||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
22.95 | % | 16.52 | % | 39.8 | % | 14.19 | % | ||||||||
Actual Tier I Risk-Based Capital |
$ | 671,522 | $ | 359,339 | 88.5 | % | $ | 438,796 | ||||||||
Minimum Capital Requirement (4%) |
$ | 117,056 | $ | 87,021 | 34.8 | % | $ | 123,727 | ||||||||
Minimum to be well capitalized (6%) |
$ | 175,584 | $ | 130,532 | 34.8 | % | $ | 185,591 | ||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
23.98 | % | 17.59 | % | 37.1 | % | 14.84 | % | ||||||||
Actual Total Risk-Based Capital |
$ | 701.715 | $ | 382,611 | 84.9 | % | $ | 458,972 | ||||||||
Minimum Capital Requirement (8%) |
$ | 234,112 | $ | 174,042 | 34.8 | % | $ | 247,454 | ||||||||
Minimum to be well capitalized (10%) |
$ | 292,640 | $ | 217,553 | 34.8 | % | $ | 309,318 | ||||||||
The Groups common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol OFG. At
September 30, 2010, the Groups market capitalization for its outstanding common stock was $616.0
million ($13.30 per share). The Oriental Financial Group Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Omnibus
Performance Incentive Plan (the Omnibus Plan), provides for equity-based compensation incentives
through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted
units and dividend equivalents, as well as equity-based performance awards. The Omnibus Plan was
adopted in 2007 and amended and restated in 2008. It was further amended in 2010.
78
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
RISK MANAGEMENT
Background
The Groups risk management policies are established by its Board of Directors (the Board),
implemented by management, through the adoption of a risk management program, which is overseen and
monitored by the Chief Risk Officer and the Risk and Compliance Management Committee. The Group has
continued to refine and enhance its risk management program by strengthening policies, processes
and procedures necessary to maintain effective risk management.
All aspects of the Groups business activities are susceptible to risk. Consequently, risk
identification and monitoring are essential to risk management. As more fully discussed below, the
Groups primary risk exposures include, market, interest rate, credit, liquidity, operational and
concentration risks.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from adverse movements in market rates or
prices, such as interest rates or prices. The Group evaluates market risk together with interest
rate risk.
The Groups financial results and capital levels are constantly exposed to market risk. The Board
and management are primarily responsible for ensuring that the market risk assumed by the Group
complies with the guidelines established by policies approved by the Board. The Board has delegated
the management of this risk to the Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) which is
composed of certain executive officers from the business, treasury and finance areas. One of ALCOs
primary goals is to ensure that the market risk assumed by the Group is within the parameters
established in such policies.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the exposure of the Groups earnings or capital to adverse movements in
interest rates. It is a predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on earnings. The
Group manages its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of changes in interest
rates on net interest income.
ALCO oversees interest rate risk, liquidity management and other related matters.
In discharging its responsibilities, ALCO examines current and expected conditions in world
financial markets, competition and prevailing rates in the local deposit market, liquidity,
unrealized gains and losses in securities, recent or proposed changes to the investment portfolio,
alternative funding sources and their costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives such
as swaps, and any tax or regulatory issues which may be pertinent to these areas.
Each quarter, the Group performs a net interest income simulation analysis on a consolidated basis
to estimate the potential change in future earnings from projected changes in interest rates. These
simulations are carried out over a one-year time horizon, assuming gradual upward and downward
interest rate movements of 200 basis points, achieved during a twelve-month period. Simulations are
carried out in two ways:
(1) | using a static balance sheet as the Group had on the simulation date, and | ||
(2) | using a dynamic balance sheet based on recent growth patterns and business strategies. |
The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and liabilities detailed by maturity or
re-pricing and their corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates rise or fall, these
simulations incorporate expected future lending rates, current and expected future funding sources
and cost, the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment rates, deposits decay and other
factors which may be important in projecting the future growth of net interest income.
The Group uses a software application to project future movements in the Groups balance sheet and
income statement. The starting point of the projections generally corresponds to the actual values
of the balance sheet on the date of the simulations.
79
Table of Contents
These simulations are highly complex, and use many simplifying assumptions that are intended to
reflect the general behavior of the Group over the period in question. There can be no assurance
that actual events will match these assumptions in all cases. For this reason, the results of these
simulations are only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest income to changes in
market interest rates. The following table presents the results of the simulations at September 30,
2010, assuming a one-year time horizon:
Net Interest Income Risk (one year projection) | ||||||||||||||||
Static Balance Sheet | Dynamic simulation | |||||||||||||||
Change in interest rate | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Change | Change | Change | Change | ||||||||||||
+ 200 Basis points |
$ | 30,482 | 19.34 | % | $ | 31,324 | 19.79 | % | ||||||||
+ 100 Basis points |
$ | 22,009 | 13.97 | % | $ | 23,100 | 14.59 | % | ||||||||
- 100 Basis points |
$ | (33,682 | ) | -21.37 | % | $ | (35,218 | ) | -22.25 | % | ||||||
- 200 Basis points |
$ | (51,217 | ) | -32.50 | % | $ | (52,133 | ) | -32.93 | % | ||||||
Future net interest income could be affected by the Groups investments in callable
securities, prepayment risk related to mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, and its
structured repurchase agreements and advances from the FHLB. As part of the strategy to limit the
interest rate risk and reduce the re-pricing gaps of the Groups assets and liabilities, the
maturity and the re-pricing frequency of the liabilities has been extended to longer terms.
The Group uses derivative instruments and other strategies to manage its exposure to interest rate
risk caused by changes in interest rates beyond managements control. The following summarizes
strategies, including derivative activities, used by the Group in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate swaps Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying principal. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were open forward settlement swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $1.250 billion. The forward settlement date of these swaps is December 28, 2011 for $900.0 million and May 9, 2012 for $350.0 million, with final maturities ranging from December 28, 2013 through December 28, 2015. The forward settlement date of the interest rate swaps is the same as the maturity date of five repurchase agreements with an aggregate balance of $1.250 billion. The Groups current strategy is to refinance such borrowings as short term repurchase agreements, and utilize the interest rate swaps to convert the short term repurchase agreements into fixed rate at a cost 283bps lower that the cost of the current long term repurchase agreements. A derivative liability of $8.3 million and a derivative asset of $8.5 million were recognized at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, related to the valuation of these swaps. |
Structured borrowings The Group uses structured repurchase agreements and advances from FHLB, with embedded put options, to reduce the Groups exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the contractual maturities of its liabilities. |
The Group offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of
the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index. At the end of five years, the depositor receives a
minimum return or a specified percentage of the average increase of the month-end value of the
stock index. The Group uses option agreements with major money center banks and major broker-dealer
companies to manage its exposure to changes in that index. Under the terms of the option
agreements, the Group receives the average increase in the month-end value of such index in
exchange for a fixed premium. The changes in fair value of the options purchased and the options
embedded in the certificates of deposit are recorded in earnings.
Derivatives instruments are generally negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) contracts. Negotiated OTC
derivatives are generally entered into between two counterparties that negotiate specific
contractual terms, including the underlying instrument, amount, exercise price and maturity.
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value the purchased options used to manage
the exposure to the stock market on stock indexed deposits represented an asset of $7.1 million,
and $6.5 million, respectively; and the options sold to customers embedded in the certificates of
deposit represented a liability of $10.1 million and $9.5 million, respectively, recorded in
deposits.
80
Table of Contents
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the possibility of loss arising from a borrower or counterparty in a credit-related
contract failing to perform in accordance with its terms. The principal source of credit risk for
the Group is its lending activities.
The Group manages its credit risk through a comprehensive credit policy which establishes sound
underwriting standards, by monitoring and evaluating loan portfolio quality, and by the constant
assessment of reserves and loan concentrations. The Group also employs proactive collection and
loss mitigation practices.
The Group may also encounter risk of default in relation to its securities portfolio. The
securities held by the Group are principally mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury and
agency securities. Thus, a substantial portion of these instruments are guaranteed by mortgages, a
U.S. government-sponsored entity or the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, and are
deemed to be of the highest credit quality. The available-for-sale securities portfolio also
includes approximately $63.2 million in non-government agency pass-through collateralized mortgage
obligations and $42.4 million in structured credit investments that are considered of a higher
credit risk than agency securities.
Managements Credit Committee, composed of the Groups Chief Executive Officer, Chief Credit Risk
Officer and other senior executives, has primary responsibility for setting strategies to achieve
the Groups credit risk goals and objectives. Those goals and objectives are set forth in the
Groups Credit Policy as approved by the Board.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk of the Group not being able to generate sufficient cash from either
assets or liabilities to meet obligations as they become due, without incurring substantial losses.
The Board has established a policy to manage this risk. The Groups cash requirements
principally consist of deposit withdrawals, contractual loan funding, repayment of borrowings as
they mature, and funding of new and existing investments as required.
The Groups business requires continuous access to various funding sources. While the Group is able
to fund its operations through deposits as well as through advances from the FHLB of New York and
other alternative sources, the Groups business is significantly dependent upon other wholesale
funding sources, such as repurchase agreements and brokered deposits. While most of the Groups
repurchase agreements have been structured with initial terms to maturity of between three and ten
years, the counterparties have the right to exercise put options before the contractual maturities.
Brokered deposits are typically offered through an intermediary to small retail investors. The
Groups ability to continue to attract brokered deposits is subject to variability based upon a
number of factors, including volume and volatility in the global securities markets, the Groups
credit rating and the relative interest rates that it is prepared to pay for these liabilities.
Brokered deposits are generally considered a less stable source of funding than core deposits
obtained through retail bank branches. Investors in brokered deposits are generally more sensitive
to interest rates and will generally move funds from one depository institution to another based on
small differences in interest rates offered on deposits.
Although the Group expects to have continued access to credit from the foregoing sources of funds,
there can be no assurance that such financing sources will continue to be available or will be
available on favorable terms. In a period of financial disruption or if negative developments occur with respect to the
Group, the availability and cost of the Groups funding sources could be adversely affected. In
that event, the Groups cost of funds may increase, thereby reducing its net interest income, or
the Group may need to dispose of a portion of its investment portfolio, which, depending upon
market conditions, could result in realizing a loss or experiencing other adverse accounting
consequences upon the dispositions. The Groups efforts to monitor and manage liquidity risk may
not be successful to deal with dramatic or unanticipated changes in the global securities markets
or other reductions in liquidity driven by the Group or market-related events. In the event that
such sources of funds are reduced or eliminated and the Group is not able to replace them on a
cost-effective basis, the Group may be forced to curtail or cease its loan origination business and
treasury activities, which would have a material adverse effect on its operations and financial
condition.
As of September 30, 2010, the Group had
approximately $142.9 million in cash and cash equivalents, $555.9 million in investment securities, and
$397.2 million in mortgage loans available to cover liquidity needs.
81
Table of Contents
The terms of the Groups structured repurchase agreements range between three and ten years, and
the counterparties have the right to exercise at par on a quarterly basis put options before their
contractual maturity from one to three years after the agreements settlement date.
Operational Risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, personnel and
systems or from external events. All functions, products and services of the Group are susceptible
to operational risk.
The Group faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the activities that
surround the delivery of banking and financial products. Coupled with external influences such as
market conditions, security risks, and legal risk, the potential for operational and reputational
loss has increased. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the Group has developed, and
continues to enhance, specific internal controls, policies and procedures that are designed to
identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. The purpose
of these policies and procedures is to provide reasonable assurance that the Groups business
operations are functioning within established limits.
The Group classifies operational risk into two major categories: business specific and
corporate-wide affecting all business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment group
works with the various business units to ensure consistency in policies, processes and assessments.
With respect to corporate wide risks, such as information security, business recovery, legal and
compliance, the Group has specialized groups, such as Information Security, Corporate Compliance,
Information Technology and Operations. These groups assist the lines of business in the development
and implementation of risk management practices specific to the needs of the business groups. All
these matters are reviewed and discussed in the Information Technology Steering Committee.
The Group is subject to extensive federal and Puerto Rico regulation, and this regulatory scrutiny
has been significantly increasing over the last several years. The Group has established and
continues to enhance procedures based on legal and regulatory requirements that are reasonably
designed to ensure compliance with all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. The Group
has a corporate compliance function, headed by a Compliance Director who reports to the Chief Risk
Officer and is responsible for the oversight of regulatory compliance and implementation of a
company-wide compliance program.
Concentration Risk
Substantially all of the Groups business activities and a significant portion of its credit
exposure are concentrated in Puerto Rico. As a consequence, the Groups profitability and financial
condition may be adversely affected by an extended economic slowdown, adverse political or economic
developments in Puerto Rico or the effects of a natural disaster, all of which could result in a
reduction in loan originations, an increase in non-performing assets, an increase in foreclosure
losses on mortgage loans, and a reduction in the value of its loans and loan servicing portfolio.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is in the fourth year of economic recession, and the central
government is currently facing a significant fiscal deficit. The Commonwealths access to the
municipal bond market and its credit ratings depend, in part, on achieving a balanced budget. In
March 2009, the Legislature passed, and Governor signed, laws to reduce spending by 10% in an
attempt to control expenditures, including public-sector employment, raise revenues through
selective tax increases, and stimulate the economy. Although the size of the Commonwealths deficit
has been reduced by the central government, the Puerto Rico economy continues to struggle.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was
carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Groups management, including
the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of the Groups disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon such evaluation, the
CEO and the CFO have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Groups disclosure controls
and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely
basis, information required to be disclosed by the Group in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act.
82
Table of Contents
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The internal control over financial reporting of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities in the
FDIC-assisted acquisition was excluded from the evaluation of effectiveness of the Groups
disclosure controls and procedures as of the period end covered by this report because of the
timing of the acquisition. As a result of the acquisition, the Group will be evaluating changes to
processes, information technology systems, and other components of internal control over financial
reporting as part of its integration process.
There was no change in the Groups internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined on rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September
30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Groups
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Group and its subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings incidental to their
business. The Group is vigorously contesting such claims. Based upon a review by legal counsel and
the development of these matters to date, management is of the opinion that the ultimate aggregate
liability, if any, resulting from these claims will not have a material adverse effect on the
Groups financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS |
In addition to other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk
factors included in the Groups Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated by this report and other
filings the Group makes with the SEC under the Exchange Act. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us at this time or that the Group currently deems immaterial may also adversely
affect the Groups business, financial condition or results of operations.
Risks Related to the Groups Business
The Group may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the FDIC-assisted acquisition.
The success of the FDIC-assisted acquisition will depend on, among other things, the Groups
ability to realize anticipated cost savings and to integrate the acquired Eurobank assets and
operations in a manner that permits growth opportunities and does not materially disrupt the
Groups existing customer relationships or result in decreased revenues resulting from any loss of
customers. If the Group is not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated
benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than
expected. Additionally, the Group made fair value estimates of certain assets and liabilities in
recording the acquisition. Actual values of these assets and liabilities could differ from the
Groups estimates, which could result in not achieving the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.
The Group cannot assure that the FDIC-assisted acquisition will have positive results, including
results relating to: correctly assessing the asset quality of the assets acquired; the total cost
of integration, including management attention and resources; the time required to complete the
integration successfully; the amount of longer-term cost savings; being able to profitably deploy
funds acquired in the transaction; or the overall performance of the combined business.
The Groups future growth and profitability depend, in part, on the ability to successfully manage
the combined operations. Integration of an acquired business can be complex and costly, sometimes
including combining relevant accounting and data processing systems and management controls, as
well as managing relevant relationships with employees, clients, suppliers and other business
partners. Integration efforts could divert management attention and resources, which could
adversely affect the Groups operations or results. The loss of key employees in connection with
this acquisition could adversely affect our ability to successfully conduct the combined
operations.
83
Table of Contents
Given the continued economic recession in Puerto Rico, notwithstanding the shared-loss agreements with the FDIC with respect to certain Eurobank assets that the Group acquired, the
Group may continue to experience increased credit costs or need to take additional markdowns and
make additional provisions to the allowance for loan and lease losses on the assets and loans
acquired that could adversely affect the Groups financial condition and results of operations in
the future. There is no assurance that as the integration efforts continue in connection with this
transaction, other unanticipated costs, including the diversion of personnel, or losses, will not
be incurred.
The FDIC-assisted acquisition may also result in business disruptions that cause the Group to lose
customers or cause customers to move their accounts or business to competing financial
institutions. It is possible that the integration process related to this acquisition could disrupt
the Groups ongoing business or result in inconsistencies in customer service that could adversely
affect the Groups ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers, depositors and
employees.
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, there have been deviations between actual and
expected cash flows in several pools of loans acquired under the FDIC-assisted acquisition. These
deviations are both positive and negative in nature. The Group continues to monitor these
deviations at the pool level consistent with relevant accounting literature to assess whether these
deviations are due to differences in time lags of collections or due to credit issues of the loans
comprising the pools. At September 30, 2010 the Group concluded that the deviations between actual
and expected cash flows arise from differences in time lags of collections and therefore no change
to the original assumptions used at the acquisition date to determine the expected cash flows were
required. In the event that positive trends continue, there could be the need to adjust the
accretable discount which will increase the interest income prospectively on the pools
prospectively. Inversely, if negative trends continue, these could lead to a recognition of a
provision for loan and lease losses and establishing an allowance for loan and lease losses.
Loans that the Group acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition may not be covered by the
shared-loss agreements if the FDIC determines that the Group has not adequately performed under
these agreements or if the shared-loss agreements have ended.
Although the FDIC has agreed to reimburse the Group for 80% of qualifying losses on covered
loans, the Group is not protected for all losses resulting from
charge-offs with respect to such loans. Also, the FDIC has the right to refuse or delay payment for loan and lease losses if the shared-loss
agreements are not performed by the Group in accordance with their terms. Additionally, the
shared-loss agreements have limited terms. Therefore, any charge-offs that the Group experiences after the terms of the shared-loss agreements have ended would not be recoverable from the FDIC.
Certain provisions of the shared-loss agreements entered into with the FDIC may have anti-takeover
effects and could limit the Groups ability to engage in certain strategic transactions that the
Groups Board of Directors believes would be in the best interests of shareholders.
The FDICs agreement to bear 80% of qualifying losses on single family residential loans for ten
years and commercial loans for five years is a significant asset of the Group and a feature of the
FDIC-assisted acquisition without which the Group would not have entered into the transaction. The
Groups agreement with the FDIC requires that the Group receive prior FDIC consent, which may be
withheld by the FDIC in its sole discretion, prior to the Group or the Groups shareholders
engaging in certain transactions. If any such transaction is completed without prior FDIC consent,
the FDIC would have the right to discontinue the loss sharing arrangement.
Among other things, prior FDIC consent is required for (a) a merger or consolidation of the Group
with or into another company if the Groups shareholders will own less than 2/3 of the combined
company and (b) a sale of shares by one or more of our shareholders that will effect a change in
control of Oriental Bank, as determined by the FDIC with reference to the standards set forth in
the Change in Bank Control Act (generally, the acquisition of between 10% and 25% the Groups
voting securities where the presumption of control is not rebutted, or the acquisition of more than
25% the Groups voting securities). Such a sale by shareholders may occur beyond the Groups
control. If the Group or any shareholder desired to enter into any such transaction, there can be
no assurances that the FDIC would grant its consent in a timely manner, without conditions, or at
all. If one of these transactions were to occur without prior FDIC consent and the FDIC withdrew
its loss share protection, there could be a material adverse impact on the Group.
The FDIC-assisted acquisition increases the Groups commercial real estate and construction loan
portfolio, which have a greater credit risk than residential mortgage loans.
With the acquisition of most of the former Eurobanks loan portfolios, the commercial real estate
loan and construction loan portfolios represent a larger portion of the Groups total loan
portfolio than prior to such transaction. This type of lending is generally considered to have
more complex credit risks than traditional single-family residential or consumer lending because
the principal is concentrated in a limited number of loans with repayment dependent on the
successful operation or completion of the related real
84
Table of Contents
estate or construction project. Consequently, these loans are more sensitive to the current adverse
conditions in the real estate market and the general economy. These loans are generally less
predictable, more difficult to evaluate and monitor, and their collateral may be more difficult to
dispose of in a market decline. Although, the negative economic aspects of these risks are
substantially reduced as a result of the FDIC shared-loss agreements, changes in national and
local economic conditions could lead to higher loan charge-offs in connection with the
FDIC-assisted acquisition, all of which would not be supported by the shared-loss agreements with
the FDIC.
Loans that the Group acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition may
be subject to impairment.
Although the loan portfolios acquired by the Group were initially accounted for at fair value,
there is no assurance that such loans will not become impaired, which may result in additional
provision for loan and lease losses related to these portfolios. The fluctuations in economic conditions, including those related
to the Puerto Rico residential, commercial real estate and construction markets, may increase the
level of credit losses that the Group makes to its loan portfolio, portfolios acquired
in the FDIC-assisted transaction, and consequently, reduce its net income. These fluctuations are
not predictable, cannot be controlled, and may have a material adverse impact on the Groups
operations and financial condition even if other favorable events occur.
The Groups decisions regarding the fair value of assets acquired could be inaccurate and its
estimated FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset may be inadequate, which could materially and
adversely affect the Groups business, financial condition, results of operations, and future
prospects.
The Group makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of the acquired loan
portfolios, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value of the real estate and other
assets serving as collateral for the repayment of secured loans. In the FDIC-assisted acquisition,
the Group recorded a shared-loss indemnification asset that it considers adequate to absorb future
losses which may occur in the acquired loan portfolios. In determining the size of the shared-loss
indemnification asset, the Group analyzed the loan portfolios based on historical loss experience,
volume and classification of loans, volume and trends in delinquencies, and nonaccruals, local
economic conditions, and other pertinent information. If the Groups assumptions are incorrect,
the current shared-loss indemnification asset may be insufficient to cover future loan losses, and increased
loss reserves may be needed to respond to different economic conditions or adverse developments in
the acquired loan portfolios. However, in the event expected losses from the acquired loan
portfolios were to increase more than originally expected, the related increase in loss reserves
would be largely offset by higher than expected indemnity payments from the FDIC. Any increase in
future loan losses could have a negative effect on our operating results.
Risks Related to Bank Regulatory Matters
The Group is subject to extensive regulation which could adversely affect our business.
The Groups operations are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local governmental
authorities and are subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing
requirements and restrictions on part or all of the Groups operations. Because the Groups
business is highly regulated, the laws, rules and regulations applicable to the Group are subject
to regular modification and change. For example, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, was recently signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act will have a
broad impact on the financial services industry, including significant regulatory and compliance
changes, such as: (1) enhanced resolution authority of troubled and failing banks and their holding
companies; (2) enhanced lending limits strengthening the existing limits on a depository
institutions credit exposure to one borrower; (3) increased capital and liquidity requirements;
(4) increased regulatory examination fees; (5) changes to assessments to be paid to the FDIC for
federal deposit insurance; (6) prohibiting bank holding companies, such as the Group, from
including in regulatory Tier 1 capital future issuances of trust preferred securities or other
hybrid debt and equity securities; and (7) numerous other provisions designed to improve
supervision and oversight of, and strengthening safety and soundness for, the financial services
sector. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act establishes a new framework for systemic risk oversight
within the financial system to be distributed among new and existing federal regulatory agencies,
including the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC. Further, the Dodd-Frank Act addresses many corporate
governance and executive compensation matters that will affect most U.S. publicly traded companies,
including the Group. Many of the requirements called for in the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented
over time and most will be subject to implementing regulations over the course of several years.
85
Table of Contents
Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will
be implemented by the various regulatory agencies and through regulations, the full extent of the
impact such requirements will have on the Groups operations is unclear. The changes resulting from
the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the profitability of the Groups business activities, require changes
to certain of the Groups business practices, impose upon the Group more stringent capital,
liquidity and leverage ratio requirements or otherwise adversely affect the Groups business. In
particular, the potential impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on the Groups operations and activities,
both currently and prospectively, include, among others:
| a reduction in the Groups ability to generate or originate revenue-producing assets as a result of compliance with heightened capital standards; | ||
| increased cost of operations due to greater regulatory oversight, supervision and examination of banks and bank holding companies, and higher deposit insurance premiums; | ||
| the limitation on the Groups ability to raise capital through the use of trust preferred securities as these securities may no longer be included as Tier I capital going forward; and | ||
| the limitation on the Groups ability to expand consumer product and service offerings due to anticipated stricter consumer protection laws and regulations. |
Further, the Group may be required to invest significant management attention and resources to
evaluate and make necessary changes in order to comply with new statutory and regulatory
requirements. Failure to comply with the new requirements may negatively impact the Groups results
of operations and financial condition. While the Group cannot predict what effect any presently
contemplated or future changes in the laws or regulations or their interpretations would have on
the Group, these changes could be materially adverse to the Groups investors.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved by the SEC.]
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
10.1
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2010, between the Group and each of the purchasers of the Series C Preferred Stock. | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
86
Table of Contents
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
(Registrant)
(Registrant)
By: | /s/ José Rafael Fernández | Date: November 4, 2010 | ||||
José Rafael Fernández | ||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
By: | /s/ Norberto González | Date: November 4, 2010 | ||||
Norberto González | ||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
87