OFG BANCORP - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-12647
Oriental Financial Group Inc.
Incorporated in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, | IRS Employer Identification No. 66-0538893 | |
Principal Executive Offices:
997 San Roberto Street
Oriental Center 10th Floor
Professional Offices Park
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00926
Telephone Number: (787) 771-6800
997 San Roberto Street
Oriental Center 10th Floor
Professional Offices Park
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00926
Telephone Number: (787) 771-6800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
33,101,406 common shares ($1.00 par value per share)
outstanding as of April 30, 2010
outstanding as of April 30, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION: |
||||||||
Item 1 Financial Statements |
||||||||
1 | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
61 | ||||||||
62 | ||||||||
62 | ||||||||
62 | ||||||||
62 | ||||||||
63 | ||||||||
63 | ||||||||
64 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
When used in this Form 10-Q or future filings by Oriental Financial Group Inc. (the Group)
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), in the Groups press releases or
other public or shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an
authorized executive officer, the words or phrases would be, will allow, intends to,
will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimated,
project, believe, should or similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995.
The future results of the Group could be affected by subsequent events and could differ
materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. If future events and actual
performance differ from the Groups assumptions, the actual results could vary significantly
from the performance projected in the forward-looking statements.
The Group wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date made and are based on managements current
expectations, and to advise readers that various factors, including local, regional and
national economic conditions, substantial changes in levels of market interest rates, credit
and other risks of lending and investment activities, competitive, and regulatory factors,
legislative changes and accounting pronouncements, could affect the Groups financial
performance and could cause the Groups actual results for future periods to differ materially
from those anticipated or projected. The Group does not undertake, and specifically disclaims,
any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or
unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
MARCH 31, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
MARCH 31, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 450,323 | $ | 247,691 | ||||
Money market investments |
17,758 | 29,432 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 468,081 | $ | 277,123 | ||||
Investments: |
||||||||
Trading securities, at fair value with amortized cost of $293
(December 31, 2009 - $522) |
293 | 523 | ||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value with amortized cost of $4,673,956
(December 31, 2009 - $5,044,017) |
4,616,819 | 4,953,659 | ||||||
Other investments |
150 | 150 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost |
19,937 | 19,937 | ||||||
Total investments |
4,637,199 | 4,974,269 | ||||||
Securities sold but not yet delivered |
116,747 | | ||||||
Loans: |
||||||||
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value |
27,785 | 27,261 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $25,977 (December 31, 2009 - $23,272) |
1,103,494 | 1,112,808 | ||||||
Total loans, net |
1,131,279 | 1,140,069 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
37,100 | 33,656 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset, net |
32,186 | 31,685 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
18,571 | 19,775 | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
9,918 | 9,347 | ||||||
Servicing asset |
7,569 | 7,120 | ||||||
Other assets |
49,870 | 57,789 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,508,520 | $ | 6,550,833 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 729,769 | $ | 693,506 | ||||
Savings accounts |
108,661 | 86,792 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit |
977,903 | 965,203 | ||||||
Total deposits |
1,816,333 | 1,745,501 | ||||||
Borrowings: |
||||||||
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings |
37,953 | 49,179 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,557,149 | 3,557,308 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB |
281,687 | 281,753 | ||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
105,112 | 105,834 | ||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
36,083 | 36,083 | ||||||
Total borrowings |
4,017,984 | 4,030,157 | ||||||
Securities purchased but not yet received |
171,813 | 413,359 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
38,216 | 31,650 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
6,044,346 | 6,220,667 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; $25 liquidation value; 1,340,000
shares of Series A and 1,380,000 shares of Series B issued and outstanding |
68,000 | 68,000 | ||||||
Common stock, $1 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 34,479,397 shares issued;
33,103,028 shares outstanding (December 31, 2009 - 25,739,397; 24,370,854 ) |
34,479 | 25,739 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
299,542 | 213,445 | ||||||
Legal surplus |
46,480 | 45,279 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
85,796 | 77,584 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost 1,376,369 shares (December 31, 2009 - 1,368,543 shares) |
(17,127 | ) | (17,142 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $3,966 (December 31, 2009 - $7,445) |
(52,996 | ) | (82,739 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
464,174 | 330,166 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 6,508,520 | $ | 6,550,833 | ||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
Quarter ended March 31 | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||
Loans |
$ | 17,598 | $ | 18,320 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
43,594 | 50,708 | ||||||
Investment securities and other |
9,105 | 14,903 | ||||||
Total interest income |
70,297 | 83,931 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Deposits |
11,243 | 13,823 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
25,285 | 35,799 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB and other borrowings |
3,012 | 3,096 | ||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
1,021 | 112 | ||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
298 | 436 | ||||||
Total interest expense |
40,859 | 53,266 | ||||||
Net interest income |
29,438 | 30,665 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
4,014 | 3,200 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
25,424 | 27,465 | ||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||
Financial service revenues |
3,978 | 3,114 | ||||||
Banking service revenues |
1,647 | 1,393 | ||||||
Investment banking revenues (losses) |
| (12 | ) | |||||
Mortgage banking activities |
1,797 | 2,153 | ||||||
Total banking and financial service revenues |
7,422 | 6,648 | ||||||
Excess of amortized cost over fair value on other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
(39,590 | ) | | |||||
Non-credit related unrealized loss on securities recognized in other comprehensive income |
38,958 | | ||||||
Other-than-temporary impairments on securities |
(632 | ) | | |||||
Net gain (loss) on: |
||||||||
Sale of securities |
12,020 | 10,340 | ||||||
Derivatives |
(10,636 | ) | 434 | |||||
Trading securities |
(3 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||
Foreclosed real estate |
(117 | ) | (162 | ) | ||||
Other investments |
9 | 13 | ||||||
Other |
14 | | ||||||
Total non-interest income, net |
8,077 | 17,246 | ||||||
Non-interest expenses: |
||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
8,250 | 7,724 | ||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
3,594 | 3,489 | ||||||
Professional and service fees |
2,153 | 2,608 | ||||||
Insurance |
1,833 | 815 | ||||||
Taxes, other than payroll and income taxes |
857 | 646 | ||||||
Advertising and business promotion |
699 | 1,204 | ||||||
Electronic banking charges |
678 | 540 | ||||||
Loan servicing expenses |
427 | 383 | ||||||
Communication |
342 | 379 | ||||||
Director and investors relations |
315 | 349 | ||||||
Clearing and wrap fees expenses |
297 | 330 | ||||||
Other |
948 | 806 | ||||||
Total non-interest expenses |
20,393 | 19,273 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
13,108 | 25,438 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
1,172 | 690 | ||||||
Net income |
11,936 | 24,748 | ||||||
Less: Dividends on preferred stock |
(1,201 | ) | (1,201 | ) | ||||
Income available to common shareholders |
$ | 10,735 | $ | 23,547 | ||||
Income per common share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.97 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.41 | $ | 0.97 | ||||
Average common shares outstanding |
25,857 | 24,245 | ||||||
Average potential common shares-options |
75 | 3 | ||||||
Average diluted common shares outstanding |
25,932 | 24,248 | ||||||
Cash dividends per share of common stock |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Preferred stock: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning and end of period |
$ | 68,000 | $ | 68,000 | ||||
Common stock: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
25,739 | 25,739 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
8,740 | | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
34,479 | 25,739 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
213,445 | 212,625 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
90,896 | | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
263 | 159 | ||||||
Common stock issuance costs |
(5,062 | ) | | |||||
Balance at end of period |
299,542 | 212,784 | ||||||
Legal surplus: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
45,279 | 43,016 | ||||||
Transfer from retained earnings |
1,201 | 2,455 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
46,480 | 45,471 | ||||||
Retained earnings: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
77,584 | 51,233 | ||||||
Net income |
11,936 | 24,748 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
(1,322 | ) | (972 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock |
(1,201 | ) | (1,201 | ) | ||||
Transfer to legal surplus |
(1,201 | ) | (2,455 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
85,796 | 71,353 | ||||||
Treasury stock: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
(17,142 | ) | (17,109 | ) | ||||
Stock purchased |
| (181 | ) | |||||
Stock used to match defined contribution plan 1165(e) |
15 | 126 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
(17,127 | ) | (17,164 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
(82,739 | ) | (122,187 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
29,743 | 35,355 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
(52,996 | ) | (86,832 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
$ | 464,174 | $ | 319,351 | ||||
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 11,936 | $ | 24,748 | ||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||
Unrealized
gain on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
44,610 | 49,874 | ||||||
Realized
gain on investment securities included in net income |
(12,020 | ) | (10,340 | ) | ||||
Excess of
amortized cost over fair value on other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
39,590 | | ||||||
Non-credit
related unrealized loss on securities |
(38,958 | ) | | |||||
Income tax
effect related to unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale |
(3,479 | ) | (4,179 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income for the period |
29,743 | 35,355 | ||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 41,679 | $ | 60,103 | ||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 11,936 | $ | 24,748 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees, net of costs |
135 | 51 | ||||||
Amortization of premiums, net of accretion of discounts |
5,559 | 740 | ||||||
Other-than-temporary impairments on securities |
632 | | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
1,333 | 1,468 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
(3,979 | ) | 862 | |||||
Provision for loan losses |
4,014 | 3,200 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
263 | 159 | ||||||
Fair value adjustment of servicing asset |
(449 | ) | 648 | |||||
(Gain) loss on: |
||||||||
Sale of securities |
(12,020 | ) | (10,340 | ) | ||||
Sale of mortgage loans held for sale |
(862 | ) | (2,482 | ) | ||||
Derivatives |
10,636 | (434 | ) | |||||
Mortgage tax credits |
| (2,153 | ) | |||||
Sale of foreclosed real estate |
117 | 162 | ||||||
Sale of premises and equipment |
(14 | ) | | |||||
Originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale |
(49,958 | ) | (55,400 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
17,633 | 37,799 | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in: |
||||||||
Trading securities |
230 | (352 | ) | |||||
Accrued interest receivable |
(3,444 | ) | 5,329 | |||||
Other assets |
419 | (6,891 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||
Accrued interest on deposits and borrowings |
(563 | ) | (2,071 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
4,476 | 2,013 | ||||||
Net cash
used in operating activities |
(13,906 | ) | (2,944 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of: |
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
(2,104,008 | ) | (2,341,384 | ) | ||||
FHLB stock |
| (13,199 | ) | |||||
Equity options |
(524 | ) | (790 | ) | ||||
Maturities and redemptions of: |
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
915,890 | 1,089,870 | ||||||
FHLB stock |
| 14,400 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of: |
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
1,238,588 | 1,360,318 | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
2,228 | 2,728 | ||||||
Premises and equipment |
(75 | ) | 5 | |||||
Origination and purchase of loans, excluding loans held-for-sale |
(28,153 | ) | (29,726 | ) | ||||
Principal repayment of loans |
30,642 | 30,980 | ||||||
Additions to premises and equipment |
(40 | ) | (1,829 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
54,548 | 111,373 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||
Deposits |
69,377 | 30,317 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and other short term borrowings |
(11,226 | ) | 15,117 | |||||
Proceeds from: |
||||||||
Issuance of FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
| 105,000 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB |
| 760,680 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock, net |
94,574 | | ||||||
Repayments of advances from FHLB |
| (787,380 | ) | |||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| (181 | ) | |||||
Termination of derivative instruments |
(236 | ) | | |||||
Dividends paid on common and preferred stock |
(2,173 | ) | (4,603 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
150,316 | 118,950 | ||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
190,958 | 227,379 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
277,123 | 66,372 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 468,081 | $ | 293,751 | ||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosure and Schedule of Noncash Activities: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 41,445 | $ | 55,337 | ||||
Mortgage loans securitized into mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 32,873 | $ | 33,355 | ||||
Securities sold but not yet delivered |
$ | 116,747 | $ | 289,565 | ||||
Securities purchased but not yet received |
$ | 171,813 | $ | 112,628 | ||||
Transfer from loans to foreclosed real estate |
$ | 2,916 | $ | 3,409 | ||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accounting and reporting policies of Oriental Financial Group Inc. (the Group or Oriental)
conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and to financial services
industry practices.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited statements are, in
the opinion of management, a fair statement of the results for the periods reported and include all
necessary adjustments, all of a normal recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations.
Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. The results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For further
information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year
ended December 31, 2009, included in the Groups 2009 annual report on Form 10-K.
Nature of Operations
The Group is a publicly-owned financial holding company incorporated under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. It has four direct subsidiaries, Oriental Bank and Trust (the Bank),
Oriental Financial Services Corp. (Oriental Financial Services), Oriental Insurance, Inc.
(Oriental Insurance) and Caribbean Pension Consultants, Inc., which is located in Boca Raton,
Florida. The Group also has a special purpose entity, Oriental Financial (PR) Statutory Trust II
(the Statutory Trust II). Through these subsidiaries and its divisions, the Group provides a wide
range of financial services such as mortgage, commercial and consumer lending, financial planning,
insurance sales, money management and investment banking and brokerage services, as well as
corporate and individual trust services.
The main offices of the Group and its subsidiaries are located in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The Group
is subject to examination, regulation and periodic reporting under the U.S. Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956, as amended, which is administered by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System.
The Bank operates through 21 financial centers located throughout Puerto Rico and is subject to
the supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of the Commissioner of Financial
Institutions of Puerto Rico (OCFI) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The
Bank offers banking services such as commercial and consumer lending, saving and time deposit
products, financial planning, and corporate and individual trust services, and capitalizes on its
commercial banking network to provide mortgage lending products to its clients. Oriental
International Bank Inc. (OIB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, operates as an
international banking entity (IBE) pursuant to the International Banking Center Regulatory Act
of Puerto Rico, as amended. OIB offers the Bank certain Puerto Rico tax advantages. OIB
activities are limited under Puerto Rico law to persons and assets/liabilities located outside of
Puerto Rico.
Oriental Financial Services is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the SEC,
and the OCFI. Oriental Insurance is
subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of the Commissioner of
Insurance of Puerto Rico.
5
Table of Contents
The Groups mortgage banking activities are conducted through a division of the Bank. The mortgage
banking activities consist of the origination and purchase of residential mortgage loans for the
Groups own portfolio and, if the conditions so warrant, the Group engages in the sale of such
loans to other financial institutions in the secondary market. The Group originates Federal Housing
Administration (FHA)-insured and Veterans Administration (VA)-guaranteed mortgages that are
primarily securitized for issuance of Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)
mortgage-backed securities which can be resold to individual or institutional investors in the
secondary market. Conventional loans that meet the underwriting requirements for sale or exchange
under standard Federal National Mortgage Association (the FNMA) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (the FHLMC) programs are referred to as conforming mortgage loans and are also
securitized for issuance of FNMA or FHLMC mortgage-backed securities. The Group is an approved
seller of FNMA, as well as FHLMC, mortgage loans for issuance of FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed
securities. The Group is also an approved issuer of GNMA mortgage-backed securities. The Group
outsources the servicing of the GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pools that it
issues or originates and of its mortgage loan
portfolio.
Significant Accounting Policies
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Group are prepared in accordance with GAAP
and with the general practices within the financial services industry. In preparing the
consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. The Group believes that, of its significant accounting policies, the following may
involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until
maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for
charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, unamortized discount related to mortgage servicing
right (MSR) sold and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on
the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees and costs and premiums and discounts on loans
purchased are deferred and amortized over the estimated life of the loans as an adjustment of their
yield through interest income using the interest method. When a loan is paid off or sold, any
unamortized deferred fee (cost) is credited (charged) to income.
Interest recognition is discontinued when loans are 90 days or more in arrears on principal and/or
interest based on contractual terms, except for collateralized residential mortgage loans for which
recognition is discontinued when they become 365 days or more past due based on contractual terms
and are then written down, if necessary, based on the specific evaluation of the collateral
underlying the loan. Loans for which the recognition of interest income has been discontinued are
designated as non-accruing. Collections are accounted for on the cash method thereafter, until
qualifying to return to accrual status. Such loans are not reinstated to accrual status until
interest is received on a current basis and other factors indicative of doubtful collection cease
to exist.
The Group follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance
for loan losses to provide for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This methodology includes
the consideration of factors such as economic conditions, portfolio risk characteristics, prior
loss experience, and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans. The provision for
loan losses charged to current operations is based on such methodology. Loan losses are charged
and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses.
Larger commercial loans that exhibit potential or observed credit weaknesses are subject to
individual review and grading. Where appropriate, allowances are allocated to individual loans
based on managements estimate of the borrowers ability to repay the loan given the availability
of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal options available to the Group.
Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired. A loan is considered
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Group will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or as a practical
expedient, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral, if the
loan is collateral dependent. Loans are individually evaluated for impairment, except large groups
of small balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, and loans that
are recorded at fair value or at the lower of cost or fair value. The Group measures for impairment
all commercial loans over $250 thousand and over 90-days past-due. The portfolios of mortgage and
consumer loans are considered homogeneous, and are evaluated collectively for impairment.
6
Table of Contents
The Group, using a rating system, applies an overall allowance percentage to each loan portfolio
category based on historical credit losses adjusted for current conditions and trends. This
calculation is the starting point for managements systematic determination of the required level
of the allowance for loan losses. Other data considered in this determination includes: the credit
grading assigned to commercial loans, delinquency levels, loss trends and other information
including underwriting standards and economic trends.
Loan loss ratios and credit risk categories are updated quarterly and are applied in the context
of GAAP and the importance of depository institutions having prudent, conservative, but not
excessive loan allowances that fall within an acceptable range of estimated losses. While
management uses current available information in estimating possible loan losses, factors beyond
the Groups control such as those affecting general economic conditions may require future changes
to the allowance.
Financial Instruments
Certain financial instruments, including derivatives, trading securities and investment securities
available-for-sale, are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are recorded in
other comprehensive income or as part of non-interest income, as appropriate. Fair values are
based on listed market prices, if available. If listed market prices are not available, fair
value is determined based on other relevant factors, including price quotations for similar
instruments. The fair values of certain derivative contracts are derived from pricing models that
consider current market and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments as well as
time value and yield curve or volatility factors underlying the positions.
The Group determines the fair value of its financial instruments based on the Fair Value
Measurement framework, which establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1
measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three
levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level
1 Level 1 asset and liabilities include equity securities that are traded in an
active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency
securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained
from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term
of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed
securities for which the fair value is estimated based on valuations obtained from
third-party pricing services for identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with
quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and (iii)
derivative contracts and financial liabilities (e.g. callable brokered CDs and medium-term
notes elected for fair value option under the fair value measurement framework), whose value
is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be
derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities
include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, for which the
determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Group changed its method of determining the amount of other-than-temporary impairments for debt
securities and for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability have significantly decreased and identifying transactions that are not orderly.
7
Table of Contents
Impairment
of Investment Securities
The Group conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment in an unrealized loss
position for other-than-temporary impairments. On April 1, 2009, the Group adopted FASB Accounting
Standard Codification (ASC) 320-10-65-1, which changed the accounting requirements for other than
temporary impairments for debt securities, and in certain circumstances, separates the amount of
total impairment into credit and noncredit-related amounts. The review takes into consideration
current market conditions, issuer rating changes and trends, the credit worthiness of the obligor
of the security, current analysts evaluations, failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or
principal payments, the Groups intent to not sell the security or whether it is
more-likely-than-not that the Group will be required to sell the debt security before its
anticipated recovery, as well as other qualitative factors. The term other than temporary
impairment is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the
prospects for a near-term recovery of value is not favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence
to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Any
portion of a decline in value associated with credit loss is recognized in income with the
remaining noncredit-related component being recognized in other comprehensive income. A credit loss
is determined by assessing whether the amortized cost basis of the security will be recovered, by
comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security, discounted at
the rate equal to the yield used to accrete current and prospective beneficial interest for the
security. The shortfall of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected in relation
to the amortized cost basis is considered to be the credit loss.
The Groups review for impairment generally entails:
| intent to sell the debt security; | ||
| if it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt securities before the anticipated recovery; | ||
| identification and evaluation of investments that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment; | ||
| periodic evaluation of investment in FHLB stock; | ||
| analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period; | ||
| discussion of evidential matter, including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual investments to qualify as having other-than-temporary impairment and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment. |
Income Taxes
In preparing the unaudited consolidated financial statements, the Group is required to estimate
income taxes. This involves an estimate of current income tax expense together with an assessment
of temporary differences resulting from differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The
determination of current income tax expense involves estimates and assumptions that require the
Group to assume certain positions based on its interpretation of current tax laws and regulations.
Changes in assumptions affecting estimates may be required in the future and estimated tax assets
or liabilities may need to be increased or decreased accordingly. The accrual for tax contingencies
is adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case
law and emerging legislation. When particular matters arise, a number of years may elapse before
such matters are audited and finally resolved. Favorable resolution of such matters could be
recognized as a reduction to the Groups effective tax rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable
settlement of any particular issue could increase the effective tax rate and may require the use of
cash in the year of resolution.
The determination of deferred tax expense or benefit is based on changes in the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities that generate temporary differences. The carrying value of the Groups net
deferred tax assets assumes that the Group will be able to generate sufficient future taxable
income based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and related assumptions change in the
future, the Group may be required to record valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets
resulting in additional income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
8
Table of Contents
Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets on a regular basis and assesses
the need for a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is established when management believes
that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Changes in valuation allowance from period to period are included in the Groups tax provision in
the period of change.
In addition to valuation allowances, the Group establishes accruals for uncertain tax positions
when, despite the belief that the Groups tax return positions are fully supported, the Group
believes that certain positions are likely to be challenged. The uncertain tax positions accruals
are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case
law, and emerging legislation. The Groups uncertain tax positions accruals are reflected as income
tax payable as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities. These accruals are reduced
upon expiration of statute of limitations.
The Group follows a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The
first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of
available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on
audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation process, if any. The second step is to
measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon
ultimate settlement.
The Groups policy is to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits
within the provision for income taxes on the consolidated statements of operations.
Equity-Based Compensation Plans
The Group's Amended and Restated 2007 Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan
(the Omnibus Plan), provides for equity-based compensation incentives through the grant of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and dividend
equivalents, as well as equity-based performance awards. The Omnibus Plan was adopted in 2007 and
amended and restated in 2008.
The purpose of the Omnibus Plan is to provide flexibility to the Group to attract, retain and
motivate directors, officers, and key employees through the grant of awards based on performance
and to adjust its compensation practices to the best compensation practice and corporate
governance trends as they develop from time to time. The Omnibus Plan is further intended to
motivate high levels of individual performance coupled with increased shareholder returns.
Therefore, awards under the Omnibus Plan (each, an Award) are intended to be based upon the
recipients individual performance, level of responsibility and potential to make significant
contributions to the Group. Generally, the Omnibus Plan will terminate as of (a) the date when no
more of the Groups shares of common stock are available for issuance under the Omnibus Plan, or,
if earlier, (b) the date the Omnibus Plan is terminated by the Groups Board.
The Boards Compensation Committee (the Committee), or such other committee as the Board may
designate, has full authority to interpret and administer the Omnibus Plan in order to carry out
its provisions and purposes. The Committee has the authority to determine those persons eligible
to receive an Award and to establish the terms and conditions of any Award. The Committee may
delegate, subject to such terms or conditions or guidelines as it shall determine, to any employee
or group of employees any portion of its authority and powers under the Omnibus Plan with respect
to participants who are not directors or executive officers subject to the reporting requirements
under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Only the Committee may exercise
authority in respect of Awards granted to such participants.
The
Omnibus Plan replaced and superseded the Groups 1996, 1998 and 2000
Incentive Stock Option Plans (the Stock Option Plans). All outstanding stock options under the
Stock Option Plans continue in full force and effect, subject to their original terms and
conditions.
The
expected term of stock options granted represents the period of time
that stock options
granted are expected to be outstanding. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility
of the Groups shares of common stock over the most recent
period equal to the expected term of the stock options.
Subsequent Events
The Group has evaluated other events subsequent to the balance sheet date and prior to filing of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and has adjusted and
disclosed those events that have occurred that would require adjustment or disclosure in the
consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted in the
current year.
9
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Developments:
FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in
Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing
Issued October, 2009, ASU 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation
of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing amends FASB ASC Topic 470 and provides guidance
for accounting and reporting for own-share lending arrangements issued in contemplation of a
convertible debt issuance. At the date of issuance, a share-lending arrangement entered into on an
entitys own shares should be measured at fair value in accordance with Topic 820 and recognized as
an issuance cost, with an offset to additional paid-in capital. Loaned shares are excluded from
basic and diluted earnings per share unless default of the share-lending arrangement occurs. The
amendments also require several disclosures including a description and the terms of the
arrangement and the reason for entering into the arrangement. The effective dates of the
amendments are dependent upon the date the share-lending arrangement was entered into and include
retrospective application for arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2009. The Group did not have a material impact on its unaudited
consolidated financial statements as a result of this update.
FASB ASU 2009-16, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (FASB ASC Subtopic 860-10)
In June 2009, the FASB issued a revision which eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity (QSPEs), changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and
includes additional disclosures requiring more information about transfers of financial assets in
which entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to the transferred financial assets.
This guidance must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting
period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application was prohibited.
The Group has adopted this guidance for transfers of financial assets commencing on January 1,
2010. The adoption of the new accounting guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets
did not have a material effect on the Groups unaudited consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASU 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable
Interest Entities (FASB ASC Subtopic 860-10)
The FASB amended on June 2009 the guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIE) and
changed how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is
not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of
whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other
things, the other entitys purpose and design and the reporting entitys ability to direct the
activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entitys economic
performance. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affect all entities that were within the
scope of the original guidance, as well as qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs) that were
previously excluded from the guidance. The new guidance requires a reporting entity to provide
additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant
changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity will be required to disclose
how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entitys financial
statements. The new guidance requires ongoing evaluation of whether an enterprise is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The guidance was effective for the Group commencing on
January 1, 2010. The adoption of the new accounting guidance on variable interest entities did not
have a material effect on the Groups unaudited consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (FASB ASC Topic 820) Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, issued in January 2010, requires new disclosures and
clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurements as set forth in FASB
ASC Subtopic 820-10. This update amends Subtopic 820-10 and now requires a reporting entity to
disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair
value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfer. Also in the reconciliation for fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should
present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. In addition, this
update clarifies existing disclosures as follows: (i) for purposes of reporting fair value
measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in
determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities, and (ii) a reporting entity should
provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both
recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. This update is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll-forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010
and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. This guidance
did not have a material effect on the Groups unaudited consolidated financial statements.
10
Table of Contents
FASB ASU 2010-08, Technical Corrections to Various Topics
FASB Accounting Standards Updated 2010-08, issued in February 2010, eliminates some inconsistencies
and outdated provisions and provides clarifications to various topics in the FASB ASC. While none
of the provisions in the amendments in this update fundamentally change U.S. GAAP, certain
clarifications made to the guidance on embedded derivatives and hedging (Subtopic 815-15 of the
FASB ASC) may cause a change in the application of that Subtopic, and thus, special transition
provisions are provided to accounting changes related to that Subtopic. The amendments in this
update are effective for the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after
issuance, except for certain amendments made to Topic 815 and the nullification of paragraph
852-70-40-45-2, which are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2009 and December 15,
2008, respectively. The Group did not have an impact on its unaudited consolidated financial
statements as a result of this update. This guidance did not have a material effect on the Groups
unaudited consolidated financial statements.
FASB
ASU 2010-10, Consolidation (Topic 810) Amendments for Certain Investment Funds
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10, issued in February 2010, clarifies the amendments to the
consolidation requirements of Topic 810 resulting from the issuance of Statement 167, which makes
the consolidation requirements deferred for a reporting entitys interest in an entity (1) that has
all the attributes of an investment company or (2) for which it is industry practice to apply
measurement principles for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by
investment companies. The deferral does not apply in situations in which a reporting entity has the
explicit or implicit obligation to fund losses of an entity that could potentially be significant
to the entity. The deferral also does not apply to interests in securitization entities,
asset-backed financing entities, or entities formerly considered qualifying special-purpose
entities. The amendments in this update are effective as of the beginning of a reporting entitys
first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within that first
annual reporting period. The effective date coincides with the effective date for the Statement 167
amendments to Topic 810. Early application is not permitted. This guidance did not have a material
effect on the Groups unaudited consolidated financial statements.
FASB
ASU 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit
Derivatives
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-11, issued in March 2010, clarifies the scope exception for
embedded credit derivative features related to the transfer of credit risk in the form of
subordination of one financial instrument to another. The amendments address how to determine which
embedded credit derivative features, including those in collateralized debt obligations and
synthetic collateralized debt obligations, are considered to be embedded derivatives that should
not be analyzed under Section 815-15-25 for potential bifurcation and separate accounting. The
amendments in this update are effective as of the beginning of a reporting entitys first fiscal
quarter beginning after June 10, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each
entitys first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this update. Currently, the Group does
not anticipate that this guidance will have a material effect on the unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
FASB
ASU 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310) Effect of a Loan Modification when the Loan is Part of
a Pool that is Accounted for as a Single Asset
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-18, issued in April 2010, clarifies that modifications of
loans that are accounted for within a pool under Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of
those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a
troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of
assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The
amendments in this update are effective for modification of loans accounted for within pools under
Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010.
The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Early application is permitted. The Group does not
anticipate that this guidance will have a material effect on the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
Other accounting standards that have been issued by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are
not expected to have a material impact on the Groups financial condition, statement of operations
or cash flows.
NOTE 2 INVESTMENTS
Money Market Investments
The Group considers as cash equivalents all money market instruments that are not pledged and that
have maturities of three months of less at the date of acquisition. At March 31, 2010, and
December 31, 2009, cash equivalents included as part of cash and due from banks amounted to $17.8
million and $29.4 million, respectively.
11
Table of Contents
Investment Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value, and weighted average yield of
the securities owned by the Group at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, were as follows:
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Average | ||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Yield | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
$ | 600,926 | $ | 939 | $ | 6,364 | $ | 595,501 | 4.70 | % | ||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
71,556 | 8 | 5,051 | 66,513 | 5.37 | % | ||||||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,723 | | 21,633 | 40,090 | 3.68 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
734,205 | 947 | 33,048 | 702,104 | ||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
3,275,908 | 18,418 | 17,079 | 3,277,247 | 4.39 | % | ||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
308,636 | 8,923 | | 317,559 | 4.64 | % | ||||||||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
245,052 | 4,076 | 416 | 248,712 | 5.15 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
110,155 | | 38,958 | 71,197 | 5.19 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed-securities and CMOs |
3,939,751 | 31,417 | 56,453 | 3,914,715 | ||||||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 4,673,956 | $ | 32,364 | $ | 89,501 | $ | 4,616,819 | 4.51 | % | ||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Average | ||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Yield | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
$ | 1,037,722 | $ | 359 | $ | 30,990 | $ | 1,007,091 | 3.18 | % | ||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
71,537 | 9 | 6,181 | 65,365 | 5.37 | % | ||||||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,722 | | 23,340 | 38,382 | 3.69 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
1,170,981 | 368 | 60,511 | 1,110,838 | ||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
2,766,317 | 22,154 | 24,298 | 2,764,173 | 4.62 | % | ||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
339,830 | 7,317 | 1,044 | 346,103 | 4.81 | % | ||||||||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
279,454 | 7,057 | 3 | 286,508 | 5.20 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
487,435 | | 41,398 | 446,037 | 5.78 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed-securities and CMOs |
3,873,036 | 36,528 | 66,743 | 3,842,821 | ||||||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 5,044,017 | $ | 36,896 | $ | 127,254 | $ | 4,953,659 | 4.48 | % | ||||||||||
The amortized cost and fair value of the Groups investment securities at March 31, 2010, by
contractual maturity, are shown in the next table. Securities not due on a single contractual
maturity date, such as collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final
contractual maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers
may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Available-for-sale | ||||||||
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||
Due after 5 to 10 years |
235,979 | 230,904 | ||||||
Due after 10 years |
498,226 | 471,200 | ||||||
734,205 | 702,104 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
||||||||
Due after 5 to 10 years |
16,634 | 17,445 | ||||||
Due after 10 years |
3,923,117 | 3,897,270 | ||||||
3,939,751 | 3,914,715 | |||||||
$ | 4,673,956 | $ | 4,616,819 | |||||
12
Table of Contents
Keeping
with the Groups investment strategy, during the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
there were certain sales of available-for-sale securities because the Group felt at the time of
such sales that gains could be realized while at the same time having good opportunities to invest
the proceeds in other investment securities with attractive yields and terms that would allow the
Group to continue to protect its net interest margin. Also, the Group, as part of its asset and
liability management, purchases agency discount notes close to their maturities as a short term
vehicle to reinvest the proceeds of sale transactions until similar investment securities with
attractive yields can be purchased. The discount notes are pledged as collateral for repurchase
agreements. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Group sold $20.0 million of discount notes
with minimal aggregate gross gains which amounted to less than $1 thousand and sold $247.0 million
of discounted notes with minimal aggregate gross losses amounted to less than $1 thousand.
In December 2009, the Group made the strategic decision to sell $116.0 million of collateralized
debt obligations at a loss of $73.9 million. For the same strategic reasons, in early January 2010,
the Group sold $374.3 million of non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations which contemplated
a loss of $45.8 million. This loss was accounted for as other-than-temporary impairment in the
fourth quarter of 2009 and no additional gain or loss was realized on the sale in January 2010,
since these assets were sold at the same value reflected at December 31, 2009.
The tables below present an analysis of the gross realized gains and losses by category for the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Original Face | Original Cost | Sale Price | Sale Book Value | Gross Gains | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of Securities Available-for-Sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored agencies |
$ | 267,000 | $ | 265,990 | $ | 266,996 | $ | 266,996 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and CMOs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
902,967 | 750,615 | 687,211 | 675,191 | 12,020 | | ||||||||||||||||||
GNMA Certificates |
32,873 | 32,927 | 32,912 | 32,912 | | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
626,619 | 623,695 | 368,216 | 368,216 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities and CMOs |
1,562,459 | 1,407,237 | 1,088,339 | 1,076,319 | 12,020 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,829,459 | $ | 1,673,227 | $ | 1,355,335 | $ | 1,343,315 | $ | 12,020 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Quarter ended March 31, 2009
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Original Face | Original Cost | Sale Price | Sale Book Value | Gains | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of Securities Available-for-Sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
$ | 11,000 | $ | 11,000 | $ | 11,000 | $ | 11,000 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
agencies |
366,000 | 366,000 | 365,981 | 365,981 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
377,000 | 377,000 | 376,981 | 376,981 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and CMOs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
458,053 | 459,756 | 421,181 | 410,889 | 10,292 | | ||||||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
40,085 | 40,588 | 40,625 | 40,577 | 48 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities and CMOs |
498,138 | 500,344 | 461,806 | 451,466 | 10,340 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 875,138 | $ | 877,344 | $ | 838,787 | $ | 828,447 | $ | 10,344 | $ | 4 | ||||||||||||
13
Table of Contents
The following table shows the Groups gross unrealized losses and fair value of investment
securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of
time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009:
March 31, 2010
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Less than 12 months | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
$ | 2,519,775 | $ | 17,079 | $ | 2,502,696 | ||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
279,833 | 5,949 | 273,884 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
118,447 | 416 | 118,031 | |||||||||
2,918,055 | 23,444 | 2,894,611 | ||||||||||
12 months or more | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
110,155 | 38,958 | 71,197 | |||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
71,174 | 5,051 | 66,123 | |||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,723 | 21,633 | 40,090 | |||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
21,093 | 415 | 20,678 | |||||||||
264,145 | 66,057 | 198,088 | ||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
2,519,775 | 17,079 | 2,502,696 | |||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
300,926 | 6,364 | 294,562 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
118,447 | 416 | 118,031 | |||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
110,155 | 38,958 | 71,197 | |||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
71,174 | 5,051 | 66,123 | |||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,723 | 21,633 | 40,090 | |||||||||
$ | 3,182,200 | $ | 89,501 | $ | 3,092,699 | |||||||
14
Table of Contents
December 31, 2009
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Less than 12 months | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
1,772,575 | 24,287 | 1,748,288 | |||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
602,926 | 30,990 | 571,936 | |||||||||
GNMA certificates |
154,916 | 1,030 | 153,886 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
2,701 | 3 | 2,698 | |||||||||
2,533,118 | 56,310 | 2,476,808 | ||||||||||
12 months or more | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
$ | 605 | $ | 11 | $ | 594 | ||||||
GNMA certificates |
350 | 14 | 336 | |||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
113,122 | 41,398 | 71,724 | |||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
71,155 | 6,181 | 64,974 | |||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,722 | 23,340 | 38,382 | |||||||||
246,954 | 70,944 | 176,010 | ||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
1,773,180 | 24,298 | 1,748,882 | |||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
602,926 | 30,990 | 571,936 | |||||||||
GNMA certificates |
155,266 | 1,044 | 154,222 | |||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
113,122 | 41,398 | 71,724 | |||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
71,155 | 6,181 | 64,974 | |||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,722 | 23,340 | 38,382 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
2,701 | 3 | 2,698 | |||||||||
$ | 2,780,072 | $ | 127,254 | $ | 2,652,818 | |||||||
The Group constantly monitors the non-agency mortgage-backed securities portfolio to measure
the collateral performance and gauge trends for such positions, and the effect of collateral
behavior on credit enhancements, cash flows, and fair values of the bonds. The Group also
periodically monitors any rating migration, and takes into account the time lag between underlying
performance and rating agency actions. This assessment is made using a cash flow model that
estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, based on the security-specific collateral and
deal structure, and also includes inputs such as constant default rates, prepayment rates, and loss
severity. The cash flows estimated by the model are distributed through the different tranches of
each security, considering subordination for the different tranches. The anticipated cash flows
expected to be collected from these debt securities were discounted at the rate equal to the yield
used to accrete the current and prospective beneficial interest for the securities. Significant
inputs included estimated cash flows, defaults and recoveries. The present value of the expected
cash flows was compared to the current outstanding balance of the tranche to determine the ratio of
the estimated present value of expected cash flows to the total current balance for the tranche.
This ratio was then multiplied by the principal balance of the security to determine the
credit-related impairment loss.
The Group adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 320-10-65-1, as of April 1, 2009. For those debt
securities for which the fair value of the security is less than its amortized cost, the Group does
not intend to sell such security, and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to
sell such security prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit
losses, these provisions require that the credit-related portion of other-than-temporary impairment
losses be recognized in earnings while the noncredit-related portion is recognized in other
comprehensive income, net of related taxes.
During the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 net credit-related impairment
losses of $632 thousand were
recognized in earnings and $39.0 million of noncredit-related impairment losses were recognized in
other comprehensive income for a non-agency collateralized mortgage obligation pool not expected to
be sold. Major inputs to measure the amount related to the credit losses were 11.01% of default
rate, 43.26% of severity, and 14.25% for prepayment rate.
15
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes other-than-temporary impairment losses (in thousands) on securities
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010:
Excess of amortized cost over fair value on other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
$ | (39,590 | ) | |
Non-credit related unrealized loss on securities recognized in other comprehensive income |
38,958 | |||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
$ | (632 | ) | |
At March 31, 2010 the total credit related other-than-temporary impairment loss recorded on
this non-agency collateralized mortgage obligation amounted to $26.0 million ($21.1 million in
2008, before the adoption of FASB ASC 320-10-65-1, $4.3 million in 2009, and $632 thousand in
2010). The Group does not intend to sell this security, and it is more likely than not, that it
will not be required to sell this security prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis less
any current period credit losses.
The following table presents a summary of credit-related impairment losses recognized in earnings
(in thousands) on the aforementioned security:
Credit-related
impairment losses recognized in earnings in:
2008 |
$ | 21,080 | ||
2009 |
4,309 | |||
2010 |
632 | |||
Total credit related impairment losses recognized in earnings up to March 31, 2010 |
$ | 26,021 | ||
At March 31, 2010, the Groups portfolio of structured credit investments amounted to $61.7
million (amortized cost) in the available-for-sale portfolio, with net unrealized losses of
approximately $21.6 million. The Groups structured credit investments portfolio consist of two
types of instruments: synthetic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and collateralized loan
obligations (CLOs). The Group estimates that it will recover all interest and principal for the
Groups specific tranches of these securities. This assessment is based on an analysis in which the
credit quality of the Groups positions was evaluated through a determination of the expected
losses on the underlying collateral. The losses on the underlying corporate pools were inferred by
observations on the credit ratings and credit spreads of the reference entities or market quotes
used to derive the credit spreads. The spreads of the portfolios were converted to loss
probabilities, and these were applied to a model that provided estimated projected losses for each
security. The model results show that the estimated future collateral losses, if any, are lower
than the Groups subordination levels for each one of these securities. Therefore, these securities
are deemed to have sufficient credit support to absorb the estimated collateral losses.
Other than temporary impairment analysis is based on estimates that depend on market conditions and
are subject to further change over time. In addition, while the Group believes that the methodology
used to value these exposures is reasonable, the methodology is subject to continuing refinement,
including those made as a result of market developments. Consequently, it is reasonably possible
that changes in estimates or conditions could result in the need to recognize additional other than
temporary impairment charges in the future.
Other securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2010 are mainly composed of securities
issued or backed by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government sponsored agencies. These
investments are primarily highly liquid securities that have a large and efficient secondary
market. Valuations are performed on a monthly basis. The Groups management believes that the
unrealized losses of such other securities at March 31, 2010, are also temporary and are
substantially related to market interest rate fluctuations and not to deterioration in the
creditworthiness of the issuer or guarantor. At March 31, 2010, the Group does not have the intent
to sell these investments in unrealized loss position.
NOTE 3 PLEDGED ASSETS
At March 31, 2010, residential mortgage loans amounting to $538.8 million were pledged to secure
advances and borrowings from the FHLB. Investment securities with fair values totaling $3.9
billion, $78.6 million and $52.4 million at March 31, 2010, were pledged to secure investment
securities sold under agreements to repurchase, public fund deposits and other funds, respectively.
Also, at March 31, 2010, investment securities with fair values totaling $11.7 million were pledged
against interest rate swaps contracts, while others with fair values of $120 thousand were pledged
to the OCIF.
As of March 31, 2010, investment securities available-for-sale not pledged amounted to $592.0
million. As of March 31, 2010, mortgage loans not pledged amounted to $391.8 million.
16
Table of Contents
NOTE 4 LOANS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Loans Receivable
The Groups credit activities are mainly with customers located in Puerto Rico. The Groups loan
transactions are encompassed within three main categories: mortgage, commercial and consumer. The
composition of the Groups loan portfolio at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Loans secured by real estate: |
||||||||
Residential 1 to 4 family |
$ | 886,926 | $ | 898,790 | ||||
Home equity loans, secured personal loans and others |
19,356 | 20,145 | ||||||
Commercial |
156,329 | 157,631 | ||||||
Deferred loan fees, net |
(3,334 | ) | (3,318 | ) | ||||
1,059,277 | 1,073,248 | |||||||
Other loans: |
||||||||
Commercial |
47,410 | 40,146 | ||||||
Personal consumer loans and credit lines |
22,954 | 22,864 | ||||||
Deferred loan fees, net |
(170 | ) | (178 | ) | ||||
70,194 | 62,832 | |||||||
Loans receivable |
1,129,471 | 1,136,080 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(25,977 | ) | (23,272 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net |
1,103,494 | 1,112,808 | ||||||
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
27,785 | 27,261 | ||||||
Total loans, net |
$ | 1,131,279 | $ | 1,140,069 | ||||
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Group maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level that management considers adequate to
provide for probable losses based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks. The Groups
allowance for loan losses policy provides for a detailed quarterly analysis of probable losses. The
analysis includes a review of historical loan loss experience, value of underlying collateral,
current economic conditions, financial condition of borrowers and other pertinent factors. While
management uses available information in estimating probable loan losses, future additions to the
allowance may be required based on factors beyond the Groups control.
The changes in the allowance for loan losses for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 23,272 | $ | 14,293 | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
4,014 | 3,200 | ||||||
Loans charged-off |
(1,392 | ) | (2,425 | ) | ||||
Recoveries |
83 | 79 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 25,977 | $ | 15,147 | ||||
The Group evaluates all loans, some individually and others as homogeneous groups, for purposes of
determining impairment. At March 31, 2010, the total investment in impaired commercial loans was
$16.6 million (December 31, 2009 $15.6 million). The impaired commercial loans were measured
based on the fair value of collateral. The valuation allowance for impaired commercial loans
amounted to approximately $624 thousand and $709 thousand at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. At March 31, 2010, the total investment in impaired mortgage loans was $10.5 million
(December 31, 2009 $10.7 million). Impairment on mortgage loans assessed as troubled debt
restructuring was measured using the present value of cash flows. The valuation allowance for
impaired mortgage loans amounted to approximately $706 thousand and $683 thousand at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively.
17
Table of Contents
NOTE 5
SERVICING ASSETS
The Group periodically sells or securitizes loans while retaining the obligation to perform the
servicing of such loans. In addition, the Group may purchase or assume the right to service loans
originated by others. Whenever the Group undertakes an obligation to service a loan, management
assesses whether a servicing asset and/or liability should be recognized. A servicing asset is
recognized whenever the compensation for servicing is expected to more than adequately compensate
the servicer for performing the servicing. Likewise, a servicing liability would be recognized in
the event that servicing fees to be received are not expected to adequately compensate the Group
for its expected cost. Servicing assets are presented as other assets in the consolidated
statements of financial condition.
Effective January 1, 2007, all separately recognized servicing assets are initially recognized at
fair value with the income statement effect recorded in mortgage banking activities. For subsequent
measurement of servicing rights, during 2009 the Group elected the fair value measurement method.
Under the fair value measurement method, the Group measures servicing rights at fair value at each
reporting date and reports changes in fair value of servicing asset in earnings in the period in
which the changes occur, and are included with mortgage banking activities in the consolidated
statement of operations. The fair value of servicing rights is subject to significant fluctuations
as a result of changes in estimated and actual prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.
The fair value of servicing rights is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which
calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into
consideration actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other
economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions.
The following table presents the changes in servicing rights measured using the fair value method
for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Fair value at beginning of period |
$ | 7,120 | $ | 2,819 | ||||
Purchases |
| | ||||||
Servicing from securitizations or assets transfers |
685 | 624 | ||||||
Changes due to payments on loans |
(104 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions |
(132 | ) | 73 | |||||
Fair value at end of period |
$ | 7,569 | $ | 3,467 | ||||
Key economic assumptions ranges used in measuring the servicing assets retained at the date of
the residential mortgage loan securitizations as follows:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Constant prepayment rate |
8.40% 29.58 | % | 13.34% 31.78 | % | ||||
Discount rate |
11.00% 14.00 | % | 10.00% 13.00 | % |
The sensitivity of the current fair value of servicing assets to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in the
above key assumptions were as follows:
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Carrying value of servicing assets |
$ | 7,569 | $ | 7,120 | ||||
Constant prepayment rate |
||||||||
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change |
$ | (262 | ) | $ | (312 | ) | ||
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change |
$ | (523 | ) | $ | (603 | ) | ||
Discount rate |
||||||||
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change |
$ | (331 | ) | $ | (330 | ) | ||
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change |
$ | (649 | ) | $ | (632 | ) |
18
Table of Contents
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate,
changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be
extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may
not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the
fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption.
In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in
market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or offset the
sensitivities.
Mortgage banking activities, a component of total banking and financial service revenues in the
unaudited consolidated statements of operations, include the changes from period to period in the
fair value of the servicing rights, which may result from changes in the valuation model inputs or
assumptions (principally reflecting changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions) and
other changes, including changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows.
Servicing fees income which is reported in the unaudited consolidated statement of operations as
mortgage banking activities is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans. The fees are based on
a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal; and are recorded as income when earned.
Servicing fees totaled $485 thousand and $319 thousand for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. There were no late fees and ancillary fees recorded for any quarter.
NOTE 6
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises and equipment at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization as follows:
Useful Life | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||
(Years) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||
Land |
| $ | 978 | $ | 978 | |||||
Buildings and improvements |
40 | 3,018 | 2,982 | |||||||
Leasehold improvements |
5 10 | 19,170 | 19,198 | |||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
3 7 | 8,575 | 8,527 | |||||||
Information technology and other |
3 7 | 16,912 | 16,944 | |||||||
48,653 | 48,629 | |||||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (30,082 | ) | (28,854 | ) | ||||||
$ | 18,571 | $19,775 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 totaled $1.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively. These are included in the unaudited consolidated
statements of operations as part of occupancy and equipment expenses.
NOTE 7 ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE AND OTHER ASSETS
Accrued interest receivable at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consists of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Loans |
$ | 11,067 | $ | 10,888 | ||||
Investments |
26,033 | 22,768 | ||||||
$ | 37,100 | $ | 33,656 | |||||
19
Table of Contents
Other assets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consist of the following:
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Prepaid FDIC Insurance |
$ | 20,996 | $ | 22,568 | ||||
Investment in equity indexed options |
7,875 | 6,464 | ||||||
Mortgage tax credits |
3,819 | 3,819 | ||||||
Other prepaid expenses |
3,496 | 4,269 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
3,223 | 3,531 | ||||||
Goodwill |
2,006 | 2,006 | ||||||
Investment in Statutory Trust |
1,086 | 1,086 | ||||||
Forward settlement swaps |
| 8,511 | ||||||
Accounts receivable and other assets |
7,369 | 5,535 | ||||||
$ | 49,870 | $ | 57,789 | |||||
On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule requiring insured depository institutions
to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for
all of 2010, 2011, and 2012, on December 30, 2009, along with each institutions risk-based
deposit insurance assessment for the third quarter of 2009. The prepayment of the assessment
covering fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012 amounted to $21.0 million and $22.6 million at March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The Group offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of
the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index. The Group uses option agreements with major
broker-dealer companies to manage its exposure to changes in this index. Under the terms of the
option agreements, the Group receives the average increase in the month-end value of the index in
exchange for a fixed premium. The changes in fair value of the option agreements used to manage the
exposure in the stock market in the certificates of deposit are recorded in earnings. At March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, the purchased options used to manage the exposure to the stock market
on stock indexed deposits represented an asset of $7.9 million (notional amount of $150.5 million)
and $6.5 million (notional amount of $150.7 million), respectively; the options sold to customers
embedded in the certificates of deposit and recorded as deposits in the unaudited consolidated
statement of financial condition, represented a liability of $10.9 million (notional amount of
$145.4 million) and $9.5 million (notional amount of $145.4 million), respectively and are included
in other liabilities on the unaudited consolidated statements of financial condition.
In December 2007, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico established mortgage loan tax credits to
financial institutions that provided financing for the acquisition of new homeowners for the period
from December 2007 to December 2008 up to a maximum amount of $220 million in tax credits overall.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Groups mortgage loan tax credits amounted to $3.8 million.
In March 2009, the Groups banking subsidiary issued $105 million in notes guaranteed under the
FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. Shortly after issuance of the notes, the Group paid
$3.2 million (equivalent to an annual fee of 100 basis points) to the FDIC to maintain the FDIC
guarantee coverage until the maturity of the notes. These costs have been deferred and are being
amortized over the term of the notes. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 this deferred issue
cost was $3.2 million.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 there were open forward settlement swaps with an aggregate
notional amount of $900 million. The forward settlement date of these swaps is December 28, 2011
with final maturities ranging from December 28, 2013 through December 28, 2014. A derivative
liability of $1.8 million and a derivative asset of $8.5 million was recognized at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively, related to the valuation of these swaps.
20
Table of Contents
NOTE 8 DEPOSITS AND RELATED INTEREST
Total deposits as of March 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009 consist of the following:
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-interest bearing demand deposits |
$ | 90,925 | $ | 73,548 | ||||
Interest-bearing savings and demand deposits |
747,505 | 706,750 | ||||||
Individual retirement accounts |
317,620 | 312,843 | ||||||
Retail certificates of deposit |
330,641 | 312,410 | ||||||
Total retail deposits |
1,486,691 | 1,405,551 | ||||||
Institutional deposits |
184,763 | 136,683 | ||||||
Brokered deposits |
144,879 | 203,267 | ||||||
$ | 1,816,333 | $ | 1,745,501 | |||||
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the weighted average interest rate of the Groups deposits
was 2.71%, and 3.13%, respectively, inclusive of non-interest bearing deposits of $90.9 million,
and $73.5 million, respectively. Interest expense for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is
set forth below:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Demand and savings deposits |
$ | 3,904 | $ | 3,752 | ||||
Certificates of deposit |
7,339 | 10,071 | ||||||
$ | 11,243 | $ | 13,823 | |||||
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, time deposits in denominations of $100 thousand or higher
amounted to $439.0 million, and $359.1 million, including public fund deposits from various local
government agencies of $75.1 million and $63.4 million at a weighted average rate of 0.73% and
0.62%, which were collateralized with investment securities with fair value of $78.6 million and
$72.6 million, respectively.
Excluding equity indexed options in the amount of $10.9 million, which are used by the Group to
manage its exposure to the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index, and also excluding accrued
interest of $4.2 million and unamortized deposit discounts in the amount of $14.2 million, the
scheduled maturities of time deposit at March 31, 2010 are as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Within one year: |
||||
Three (3) months or less |
$ | 215,855 | ||
Over 3 months through 1 year |
332,254 | |||
548,109 | ||||
Over 1 through 2 years |
240,102 | |||
Over 2 through 3 years |
84,336 | |||
Over 3 through 4 years |
66,389 | |||
Over 4 through 5 years |
37,997 | |||
$ | 976,933 | |||
The aggregate amount of overdraft in demand deposit accounts that were reclassified to loans
amounted to $1.5 million as of March 31, 2010, (December 31, 2009 $1.6 million).
21
Table of Contents
NOTE 9
BORROWINGS
Federal Funds Purchased and Short Term Borrowings
At March 31, 2010, federal funds purchased and short term borrowings amounted to approximately
$38.0 million (December 31, 2009 $49.2 million) which mainly consist of federal funds purchased
with a weighted average rate of 0.47% (December 31, 2009 0.44%).
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase
At March 31, 2010, securities underlying agreements to repurchase were delivered to, and are being
held by, the counterparties with whom the repurchase agreements were transacted. The counterparties
have agreed to resell to the Group the same or similar securities at the maturity of the
agreements.
At March 31, 2010, securities sold under agreements to repurchase (classified by counterparty),
excluding accrued interest in the amount of $7.1 million, were as follows:
Fair Value of | ||||||||
Borrowing | Underlying | |||||||
Balance | Collateral | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. |
$ | 1,700,000 | $ | 1,867,498 | ||||
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC |
1,250,000 | 1,311,834 | ||||||
UBS Financial Services Inc. |
500,000 | 583,099 | ||||||
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA |
100,000 | 119,966 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 3,550,000 | $ | 3,882,397 | ||||
The terms of the Groups structured repurchase agreements range between three and ten years, and
the counterparties have the right to exercise at par on a quarterly basis put options before their
contractual maturity from one to three years after the agreements settlement dates. The following
table shows a summary of these agreements and their terms, excluding accrued interest in the amount
of $7.1 million, at March 31, 2010:
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Settlement | |||||||||||||||||||
Year of Maturity | Borrowing Balance | Coupon | Date | Maturity Date | Next Put Date | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 100,000 | 4.39 | % | 8/14/2007 | 8/16/2010 | 5/14/2010 | ||||||||||||||
100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.17 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 6/28/2010 | |||||||||||||||
350,000 | 4.23 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 6/28/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.29 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 6/28/2010 | |||||||||||||||
350,000 | 4.35 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 6/28/2010 | |||||||||||||||
900,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
350,000 | 4.26 | % | 5/9/2007 | 5/9/2012 | 5/9/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.50 | % | 8/14/2007 | 8/14/2012 | 5/14/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.47 | % | 9/13/2007 | 9/13/2012 | 6/13/2010 | |||||||||||||||
150,000 | 4.31 | % | 3/6/2007 | 12/6/2012 | 6/7/2010 | |||||||||||||||
700,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.72 | % | 7/27/2007 | 7/27/2014 | 4/27/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
500,000 | 4.51 | % | 3/2/2007 | 3/2/2017 | 6/2/2010 | ||||||||||||||
250,000 | 0.25 | % | 3/2/2007 | 3/2/2017 | 6/2/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 0.00 | % | 6/6/2007 | 3/6/2017 | 6/6/2010 | |||||||||||||||
900,000 | 0.00 | % | 3/6/2007 | 6/6/2017 | 6/6/2010 | |||||||||||||||
1,750,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 3,550,000 | 2.85 | % | |||||||||||||||||
22
Table of Contents
None of the structured repurchase agreements referred to above with put dates up to the date of
this filing were put by the counterparties at their corresponding put dates. The repurchase
agreements include $1.25 billion, which reset at the put date at a formula which is based on the
three-month LIBOR rate less fifteen times the difference between the ten-year SWAP rate and the
two-year SWAP rate, with a minimum of 0.00% on $1.0 billion and 0.25% on $250 million, and a
maximum of 10.6%. These repurchase agreements bear the respective minimum rates of 0.0% (from March
6, 2009) and 0.25% (from March 2, 2009) to at least their next put dates scheduled for June 2010.
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
During 2007, the Group restructured most of its FHLB advances portfolio into longer-term,
structured advances. The terms of these advances range between five and seven years, and the FHLB
has the right to exercise at par on a quarterly basis put options before the contractual maturity
of the advances from six months to one year after the advances settlement dates. The following
table shows a summary of these advances and their terms, excluding accrued interest in the amount
of $1.7 million, at March 31, 2010:
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year of | Borrowing | Average | Settlement | Maturity | Next Put | |||||||||||||||
Maturity | Balance | Coupon | Date | Date | Date | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 25,000 | 4.37 | % | 5/4/2007 | 5/4/2012 | 5/4/2010 | ||||||||||||||
25,000 | 4.57 | % | 7/24/2007 | 7/24/2012 | 4/24/2010 | |||||||||||||||
25,000 | 4.26 | % | 7/30/2007 | 7/30/2012 | 4/30/2010 | |||||||||||||||
50,000 | 4.33 | % | 8/10/2007 | 8/10/2012 | 5/10/2010 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.09 | % | 8/16/2007 | 8/16/2012 | 5/16/2010 | |||||||||||||||
225,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 4.20 | % | 5/8/2007 | 5/8/2014 | 5/8/2010 | |||||||||||||||
30,000 | 4.22 | % | 5/11/2007 | 5/11/2014 | 5/11/2010 | |||||||||||||||
55,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 280,000 | 4.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||
None of the structured advances from the FHLB referred to above with put dates up to the date of
this filing were put by the counterparty at their corresponding put dates.
Subordinated Capital Notes
Subordinated capital notes amounted to $36.1 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
In August 2003, the Statutory Trust II, special purpose entity of the Group, was formed for the
purpose of issuing trust redeemable preferred securities. In September 2003, $35.0 million of trust
redeemable preferred securities were issued by the Statutory Trust II as part of pooled
underwriting transactions. Pooled underwriting involves participating with other bank holding
companies in issuing the securities through a special purpose pooling vehicle created by the
underwriters.
The proceeds from this issuance were used by the Statutory Trust II to purchase a like amount of
floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated capital notes)
issued by the Group. The subordinated capital note has a par value of $36.1 million, bears interest
based on 3-month LIBOR plus 295 basis points (3.21% at March 31, 2010; 3.20% at December 31, 2009),
payable quarterly, and matures on September 17, 2033. The subordinated capital note purchased by
the Statutory Trust II may be called at par after five years and quarterly thereafter (next call
date June 2010). The trust redeemable preferred securities have the same maturity and call
provisions as the subordinated capital notes. The subordinated deferrable interest debentures
issued by the Group are accounted for as a liability denominated as subordinated capital notes on
the unaudited consolidated statements of financial condition.
23
Table of Contents
The subordinated capital notes are treated as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes. Under Federal
Reserve Board rules, restricted core capital elements, which are qualifying trust preferred
securities, qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock (and related surplus) and certain
minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, are limited in the aggregate to no more than 25%
of a bank holding companys core capital elements (including restricted core capital elements), net
of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability.
FDIC Guaranteed Term Notes Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
The Groups banking subsidiary issued in March 2009 $105 million in notes guaranteed under the FDIC
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. These notes are due on March 16, 2012, bear interest at a
2.75% fixed rate, and are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Interest on the
notes is payable on the 16th of each March and September, beginning September 16, 2009.
Shortly after issuance of the notes, the Group paid $3.2 million (equivalent to an annual fee of
100 basis points) to the FDIC to maintain the FDIC guarantee coverage until the maturity of the
notes. This cost has been deferred and is being amortized over the term of the notes.
NOTE 10 DERIVATIVE ACTIVITIES
The Group may use various derivative instruments as part of its asset and liability management.
These transactions involve both credit and market risks. The notional amounts are amounts on which
calculations, payments, and the value of the derivatives are based. Notional amounts do not
represent direct credit exposures. Direct credit exposure is limited to the net difference between
the calculated amounts to be received and paid, if any. The actual risk of loss is the cost of
replacing, at market, these contracts in the event of default by the counterparties. The Group
controls the credit risk of its derivative financial instrument agreements through credit
approvals, limits, monitoring procedures and collateral, when considered necessary.
Derivative instruments are generally negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) contracts. Negotiated OTC
derivatives are generally entered into between two counterparties that negotiate specific
contractual terms, including the underlying instrument, amount, exercise price, and maturity.
The Group generally uses interest rate swaps and options in managing its interest rate risk
exposure. Under the swaps, the Group usually pays a fixed monthly or quarterly cost and receives a
floating thirty or ninety-day payment based on LIBOR. Floating rate payments received from the swap
counterparties partially offset the interest payments to be made. If market conditions warrant, the
Group might terminate the swaps prior to their maturity.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010 losses of $10.6 million were recognized and reflected as
Derivative Activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations, mostly associated
with the fair value adjustment to the forward settlement swap held by the Group at March 31, 2010.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009 gains of $434 thousand were recognized and reflected as
Derivative Activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations.
The Group offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of
the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index. The Group uses option agreements with major
broker-dealer companies to manage its exposure to changes in this index. Under the terms of the
option agreements, the Group receives the average increase in the month-end value of the index in
exchange for a fixed premium. The changes in fair value of the option agreements used to manage the
exposure in the stock market in the certificates of deposit are recorded in earnings.
There were no derivatives designated as a hedge as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. At
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the purchased options used to manage the exposure to the
stock market on stock indexed deposits represented an asset of $7.9 million (notional amount of
$150.5 million) and $6.5 million (notional amount of $150.7 million), respectively; the options
sold to customers embedded in the certificates of deposit and recorded as deposits in the unaudited
consolidated statement of financial condition, represented a liability of $10.9 million (notional
amount of $145.4 million) and $9.5 million (notional amount of $145.4 million), respectively and
are included in other liabilities on the unaudited consolidated statements of financial condition.
NOTE 11 INCOME TAX
Under the Puerto Rico Code, all companies are treated as separate taxable entities and are not
entitled to file consolidated returns. The Group and its subsidiaries are subject to Puerto Rico
regular income tax or alternative minimum tax (AMT) on income earned from all sources. The AMT is
payable if it exceeds regular income tax. The excess of AMT over regular income tax paid in any
one year may be used to offset regular income tax in future years, subject to certain limitations.
24
Table of Contents
The Group maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum marginal statutory rate of 40.95%
and 40.95%, as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, mainly due to the interest income arising
from investments exempt from Puerto Rico income taxes, net of expenses attributable to the exempt
income. Exempt interest relates mostly to interest earned on obligations of the United States and
Puerto Rico governments and certain mortgage-backed securities, including securities held by the
Banks international banking entity. Pursuant to the Declaration of Fiscal Emergency and Omnibus
Plan for Economic Stabilization and Restoration of the Puerto Rico Credit Act of March 9, 2009, for
tax years beginning after December 31, 2008, and ending before January 1, 2012, every taxable
corporation engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico, including banks and insurance companies
are subject to an additional five percent (5%) surcharge on corporate income tax, increasing the
maximum tax rate from 39% to 40.95%. Also, income earned by international banking entities, which
was previously fully exempt, is subject to a 5% income tax during the same period. These temporary
taxes were enacted as a measure to generate additional revenues to address the fiscal crisis that
the government of Puerto Rico is currently facing.
The Group classifies unrecognized tax benefits in income taxes payable. These gross unrecognized
tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if realized. The balance of unrecognized tax
benefits at March 31, 2010 was $6.4 million (December 31, 2009 $6.3 million), and variance is
mainly associated with accrued interests. The tax periods from 2005 to 2009, remain subject to
examination by the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury.
The Groups policy to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within
the provision for taxes on the consolidated statements of operations did not change as a result of
implementing these provisions. The Group had accrued $2.2 million at March 31, 2010 (December 31,
2009 $2.1 million) for the payment of interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax
benefits.
NOTE 12 STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Treasury Stock
Under the Groups current stock repurchase program it is authorized to purchase in the open market
up to $15.0 million of its outstanding shares on common stock. The shares of common stock
repurchased are to be held by the Group as treasury shares. There were no repurchases during the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be
repurchased under the program amounted to $11.3 million at March 31, 2010.
The activity in connection with common shares held in treasury by the Group for the quarters ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 is set forth below:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Dollar | Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
1,504 | $ | 17,142 | 1,436 | $ | 17,109 | ||||||||||
Common shares repurchased under
the repurchase program |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Common shares repurchased /used
to match defined contribution plan, net |
(8 | ) | (15 | ) | 126 | 55 | ||||||||||
End of period |
1,496 | $ | 17,127 | 1,562 | $ | 17,164 | ||||||||||
25
Table of Contents
Equity-Based Compensation Plan
The Omnibus Plan was amended and restated in 2008. It provides for equity-based compensation
incentives through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, and dividend equivalents, as well as equity-based performance awards. The
Omnibus Plan replaced and superseded the Stock Option Plans. All outstanding stock options under
the Stock Option Plans continue in full force and effect, subject to their original terms. Under
the Omnibus Plan, the group granted 132,700 options and 53,500 restricted units in the quarter
ended March 31, 2010.
The
activity in outstanding stock options in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 is set forth below:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | ||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||
Number | Average | |||||||
Of | Exercise | |||||||
Options | Price | |||||||
Beginning of period |
514,376 | $ | 16.86 | |||||
Options granted |
132,700 | 11.50 | ||||||
Options exercised |
| | ||||||
Options forfeited |
| | ||||||
End of period |
647,076 | $ | 15.76 | |||||
The following table summarizes the range of exercise prices and the weighted average remaining
contractual life of the options outstanding at March 31, 2010:
Outstanding | Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise | Contract | Number of | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices | Options | Price | Life (Years) | Options | Price | |||||||||||||||||||||||
$5.63 |
to | $ | 8.45 | 22,502 | $ | 8.06 | 6.5 | 6,826 | $ | 7.55 | ||||||||||||||||||
8.45 | to | 11.27 | 3,000 | 10.29 | 7.4 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
11.27 |
to | 14.09 | 380,039 | 12.10 | 7.2 | 127,864 | 12.42 | |||||||||||||||||||||
14.09 |
to | 16.90 | 62,035 | 15.60 | 4.4 | 46,035 | 15.78 | |||||||||||||||||||||
19.72 |
to | 22.54 | 29,600 | 20.70 | 5.0 | 22,100 | 20.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||
22.54 |
to | 25.35 | 88,850 | 23.98 | 4.1 | 88,850 | 23.98 | |||||||||||||||||||||
25.35 |
to | 28.17 | 61,050 | 27.48 | 4.8 | 61,050 | 27.48 | |||||||||||||||||||||
647,076 | $ | 15.76 | 6.1 | 352,725 | $ | 18.78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
$ | 672,255 | $ | 180,442 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
average fair value of each stock option granted during 2010 was $6.45. The average fair value of each
stock option granted was estimated at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded
options that have no restrictions and are fully transferable and negotiable in a free trading
market. Black-Scholes does not consider the employment, transfer or vesting restrictions that are
inherent in the Groups employee stock options. Use of an option valuation model, as required by GAAP,
includes highly subjective assumptions based on long-term predictions, including the expected stock
price volatility and average life of each option grant.
26
Table of Contents
The
following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of the
stock options granted during the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Weighted Average Assumptions: |
||||||||
Dividend yield |
1.39 | % | 4.64 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
58.81 | % | 33.60 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
3.44 | % | 4.49 | % | ||||
Expected life (in years) |
8 | 8.5 |
The following table summarizes the restricted units activity under the Omnibus Plan:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | ||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Restricted | Grant Date | |||||||
Units | Fair Value | |||||||
Beginning of year |
147,625 | $ | 14.64 | |||||
Restricted units granted |
53,500 | 11.40 | ||||||
Restricted units exercised |
| | ||||||
Restricted units forfeited |
(400 | ) | 21.86 | |||||
End of year |
200,725 | $ | 13.76 | |||||
Earnings per Common Share
The calculation of earnings per common share for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is as
follows:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 11,936 | $ | 24,748 | ||||
Less: Dividends on preferred stock |
(1,201 | ) | (1,201 | ) | ||||
Income available to common shareholders |
$ | 10,735 | $ | 23,547 | ||||
Weighted average common shares and share equivalents: |
||||||||
Average common shares outstanding |
25,857 | 24,245 | ||||||
Average potential common shares-options |
75 | 3 | ||||||
Total |
25,932 | 24,248 | ||||||
Earnings
per common share basic |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.97 | ||||
Earnings
per common share diluted |
$ | 0.41 | $ | 0.97 | ||||
For the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, weighted-average stock options with an
anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share not included in the calculation amounted to 416,176 and
501,700, respectively.
27
Table of Contents
Legal Surplus
The Banking Act requires that a minimum of 10% of the Banks net income for the year be transferred
to a reserve fund until such fund (legal surplus) equals the total paid in capital on common and
preferred stock. At March 31, 2010, legal surplus amounted to $46.5 million (December 31, 2009 -
$45.3 million). The amount transferred to the legal surplus account is not available for the
payment of dividends to shareholders. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy
statement that bank holding companies should generally pay dividends only from operating earnings
of the current and preceding two years.
Preferred Stock
On May 28, 1999, the Group issued 1,340,000 shares of 7.125% Noncumulative Monthly Income Preferred
Stock, Series A, at $25 per share. Proceeds from issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, were
$32.4 million, net of $1.1 million of issuance costs. The Series A Preferred Stock has the
following characteristics: (1) annual dividends of $1.78 per share, payable monthly, if declared by
the Board of Directors; missed dividends are not cumulative, (2) redeemable at the Groups option
beginning on May 30, 2004, (3) no mandatory redemption or stated maturity date and (4) liquidation
value of $25 per share.
On September 30, 2003, the Group issued 1,380,000 shares of 7.0% Noncumulative Monthly Income
Preferred Stock, Series B, at $25 per share. Proceeds from issuance of the Series B Preferred
Stock, were $33.1 million, net of $1.4 million of issuance costs. The Series B Preferred Stock has
the following characteristics: (1) annual dividends of $1.75 per share, payable monthly, if
declared by the Board of Directors; missed dividends are not cumulative, (2) redeemable at the
Groups option beginning on October 31, 2008, (3) no mandatory redemption or stated maturity date,
and (4) liquidation value of $25 per share.
On
April 30, 2010, the Group sold $200.0 million of its
Mandatorily Convertible Non-Cumulative Non-Voting Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series C, through a private placement. The preferred
stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and, subject
to approval of the Groups stockholders, the Series C preferred
stock will be convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion
price of $15.015 per share. The Group intends to seek stockholder
approval at a special meeting to be held as soon as practicable, but
in no event later than 75 days after the closing of the purchase
of the Series C preferred stock, to provide for such
convertibility. The Series C preferred stock were offered and
sold in a private placement and have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be offered or sold in
the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from
registration requirements.
At the
annual meeting of stockholders held on April 30, 2010, a majority of
the outstanding shares entitled to vote approved an increase of the
authorized number of shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per
share, from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000.
Common Stock
On March 19, 2010, the Group completed the public offering of 8,740,000 shares of its common stock.
The offering resulted in net proceeds of $94.5 million after deducting offering costs.
At the
annual meeting of stockholders held on April 30, 2010, a majority of
the outstanding shares entitled to vote approved an increase of the
authorized number of shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per
share, from 40,000,000 to 100,000,000.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax, as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
consisted of:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale which are not other-than-temporarily impaired |
$ | (18,004 | ) | $ | (48,786 | ) | ||
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale which a portion of other-than-temporary
impairment has been recorded in earnings |
(38,958 | ) | (41,398 | ) | ||||
Tax effect of accumulated other comprehensive loss |
3,966 | 7,445 | ||||||
$ | (52,996 | ) | $ | (82,739 | ) | |||
Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Group (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Groups and the Banks
financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Group and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as
calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other
factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Group and
the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and
Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the
regulations) and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined in the regulations). As of March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Group and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to
which they are subject.
28
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the FDIC categorized the Bank as well capitalized
under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized,
an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios
as set forth in the following tables. The Groups and the Banks actual capital amounts and ratios
as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:
Actual | Minimum Capital Requirement |
|||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Group Ratios |
||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 544,400 | 24.73 | % | $ | 176,137 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 518,423 | 23.55 | % | $ | 88,069 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier I Capital to Total Assets |
$ | 518,423 | 7.82 | % | $ | 265,217 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 437,975 | 19.84 | % | $ | 176,591 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 414,702 | 18.79 | % | $ | 88,295 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier I Capital to Total Assets |
$ | 414,702 | 6.52 | % | $ | 254,323 | 4.00 | % |
Minimum to be Well | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized Under | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum Capital | Prompt Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Requirement | Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank Ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 489,974 | 22.70 | % | $ | 172,644 | 8.00 | % | $ | 215,805 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 463,998 | 21.50 | % | $ | 86,322 | 4.00 | % | $ | 129,483 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Total Assets |
$ | 463,998 | 7.15 | % | $ | 259,724 | 4.00 | % | $ | 324,655 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 382,611 | 17.59 | % | $ | 174,042 | 8.00 | % | $ | 217,553 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 359,339 | 16.52 | % | $ | 87,021 | 4.00 | % | $ | 130,532 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Total Assets |
$ | 359,339 | 5.78 | % | $ | 248,678 | 4.00 | % | $ | 310,847 | 5.00 | % |
The Groups ability to pay dividends to its stockholders and other activities can be restricted if
its capital falls below levels established by the Federal Reserve Boards guidelines. In addition,
any bank holding company whose capital falls below levels specified in the guidelines can be
required to implement a plan to increase capital.
NOTE 13 FAIR VALUE
As discussed in Note 1, the Group follows the fair value measurement framework under GAAP.
Fair Value Measurement
The Fair value measurement framework defines fair value as the exchange price that would be
received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. This framework also establishes a fair value hierarchy which
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to
measure fair value:
Level 1 Level 1 asset and liabilities include equity securities that are traded in an
active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency
securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained
from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term
of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed
securities for which the fair value is estimated based on valuations obtained from
third-party pricing services for identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with
quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and (iii)
derivative contracts and financial liabilities (e.g. callable brokered CDs and medium-term
notes elected for fair value option under the fair value measurement framework, whose value
is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be
derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
29
Table of Contents
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities
include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, for which the
determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair
value:
Money market investments
The fair value of money market investments is based on the carrying amounts reflected in the
consolidated statements of financial condition as these are reasonable estimates of fair value
given the short-term nature of the instruments.
Investment securities
The fair value of investment securities is based on quoted market prices, when available, or market
prices provided by recognized broker dealers. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair
value is based upon externally developed models that use both observable and unobservable inputs
depending on the market activity of the instrument. Structured credit investments and non-agency
collateralized mortgage obligations are classified as Level 3. The estimated fair value of the
structured credit investments and the non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations are determined
by using a third-party cash flow valuation model to calculate the present value of projected future
cash flows. The assumptions, which are highly uncertain and require a high degree of judgment,
include primarily market discount rates, current spreads, duration, leverage, default, home price
depreciation, and loss rates. The assumptions used are drawn from a wide array of data sources,
including the performance of the collateral underlying each deal. The external-based valuation,
which is obtained at least on a quarterly basis, is analyzed by management and its assumptions are
evaluated and incorporated in either an internal-based valuation model when deemed necessary or
compared to counterparties prices and agreed by management.
Derivative instruments
The fair values of the derivative instruments were provided by valuation experts and
counterparties. Certain derivatives with limited market activity are valued using externally
developed models that consider unobservable market parameters. Based on the valuation methodology,
derivative instruments are classified as Level 3. The Group offers its customers certificates of
deposit with an option tied to the performance of the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index (S&P
Index), and uses equity indexed option agreements with major broker-dealer companies to manage its
exposure to changes in this index. Their fair value is obtained through the use of an external
based valuation that was thoroughly evaluated and adopted by management as its measurement tool for
these options. The payoff of these options is linked to the average value of the S&P Index on a
specific set of dates during the life of the option. The methodology uses an average rate option or
a cash-settled option whose payoff is based on the difference between the expected average value of
the S&P Index during the remaining life of the option and the strike price at inception. The
assumptions, which are uncertain and require a degree of judgment, include primarily S&P Index
volatility, forward interest rate projections, estimated index dividend payout, and leverage.
Servicing asset
Servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. Servicing rights
are priced using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers servicing fees,
portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary
revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Due to unobservable nature of certain
valuation inputs, the servicing rights are classified as Level 3.
Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired that are collateral dependent
The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from
appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 310-10-35. The associated loans
considered impaired are classified as Level 3.
Foreclosed real estate
Foreclosed real estate includes real estate properties securing residential mortgage and commercial
loans. The fair value of foreclosed real estate may be determined using an external appraisal,
broker price option or an internal valuation. These foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3
given certain internal adjustments that may be made to external appraisals.
30
Table of Contents
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis including financial liabilities
for which the Group has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
$ | | $ | 4,505,532 | $ | 111,287 | $ | 4,616,819 | ||||||||
Money market investments |
17,758 | | | 17,758 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
| 49 | 7,875 | 7,924 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
| (1,782 | ) | (10,931 | ) | (12,713 | ) | |||||||||
Servicing asset |
| | 7,569 | 7,569 | ||||||||||||
$ | 17,758 | $ | 4,503,799 | $ | 115,800 | $ | 4,637,357 | |||||||||
The table below presents reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the quarter ended March
31, 2010:
Total Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
(Quarter ended March 31, 2010) | ||||||||||||||||
Level 3 Instruments Only | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities | Derivative | Derivative | ||||||||||||||
available-for-sale | asset | liability | Servicing asset | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 110,106 | $ | 6,464 | $ | (9,543 | ) | $ | 7,120 | |||||||
Gains (losses) included in earnings |
(632 | ) | 1,125 | (1,281 | ) | | ||||||||||
Changes in fair value included in other comprehensive income |
4,147 | | | | ||||||||||||
New instruments acquired |
| 327 | (342 | ) | | |||||||||||
Principal repayments and amortization |
(2,334 | ) | (41 | ) | 235 | (104 | ) | |||||||||
Servicing from securitization or assets transferred |
| | | 685 | ||||||||||||
Change in fair value of servicing asset |
| | | (132 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 111,287 | $ | 7,875 | $ | (10,931 | ) | $ | 7,569 | |||||||
There were no transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the
quarter ended March 31, 2010.
31
Table of Contents
The table below presents a detail of investment securities available-for-sale classified as level 3
at March 31, 2010:
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Type |
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Weighted Average Yield |
Principal Protection |
|||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-agency collateralized
mortgage obligations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Alt-A Collateral |
$ | 110,155 | $ | 38,958 | $ | 71,197 | 5.19 | % | 3.53 | % | ||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
||||||||||||||||||||
CDO |
25,548 | 9,880 | 15,668 | 5.80 | % | 6.97 | % | |||||||||||||
CLO |
15,000 | 5,490 | 9,510 | 2.40 | % | 7.59 | % | |||||||||||||
CLO |
11,975 | 3,760 | 8,215 | 1.78 | % | 26.18 | % | |||||||||||||
CLO |
9,200 | 2,503 | 6,697 | 2.05 | % | 21.37 | % | |||||||||||||
61,723 | 21,633 | 40,090 | 3.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 171,878 | $ | 60,591 | $ | 111,287 | 4.65 | % | |||||||||||||
Additionally, the Corporation may be required to measure certain assets at fair value in
periods subsequent to initial recognition on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. The
adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower of cost or fair value
accounting, identification of impaired loans requiring specific reserves under FASB ASC 310-10-35
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, or write-downs of individual assets. The
following tables present financial and non-financial assets that were subject to a fair value
measurement on a nonrecurring basis during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and which were still
included in the unaudited consolidated statement of financial condition as such date. The amounts
disclosed represent the aggregate of the fair value measurements of those assets as of the end of
the reporting period.
Carrying value at | ||||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Level 3 | Level 3 | |||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||
Impaired loans (1) |
$ | 10,759 | $ | 9,355 | ||||
Foreclosed real estate (2) |
9,918 | 9,347 | ||||||
$ | 20,677 | $ | 18,702 | |||||
(1) | Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment of commercial loans was measured based on the fair value of collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices on observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with provisions of ASC 310-10-35. | |
(2) | Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate that was measured at fair value. |
Impaired loans, which are measured using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent
loans, had a carrying amount of $10.8 million and $9.4 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively, with a valuation allowance of $624 thousand and $709 thousand at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The information about the estimated fair value of financial instruments required by GAAP is
presented hereunder. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent
managements estimate of the underlying value of the Group.
32
Table of Contents
The estimated fair value is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions
could affect these fair value estimates. The fair value estimates do not take into consideration
the value of future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not financial
instruments. Other significant tangible and intangible assets that are not considered financial
instruments are the value of long-term customer relationships of the retail deposits, and premises
and equipment.
The estimated fair value and carrying value of the Groups financial instruments at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 is as follows:
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Carrying | Fair | Carrying | |||||||||||||
Value | Value | Value | Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 468,081 | $ | 468,081 | $ | 277,123 | $ | 277,123 | ||||||||
Trading securities |
293 | 293 | 523 | 523 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
4,616,819 | 4,616,819 | 4,953,659 | 4,953,659 | ||||||||||||
FHLB stock |
19,937 | 19,937 | 19,937 | 19,937 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold but yet not delivered |
116,747 | 116,747 | | | ||||||||||||
Total loans (including loans held-for-sale) |
1,127,320 | 1,131,279 | 1,150,340 | 1,140,069 | ||||||||||||
Investment in equity indexed options |
7,875 | 7,875 | 6,464 | 6,464 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
37,100 | 37,100 | 33,656 | 33,656 | ||||||||||||
Derivative asset |
49 | 49 | 8,511 | 8,511 | ||||||||||||
Servicing asset |
7,569 | 7,569 | 7,120 | 7,120 | ||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
1,813,184 | 1,816,333 | 1,741,417 | 1,745,501 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,721,520 | 3,557,149 | 3,777,157 | 3,557,308 | ||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
279,992 | 281,687 | 301,004 | 281,753 | ||||||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
105,979 | 105,112 | 111,472 | 105,834 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
36,081 | 36,083 | 36,083 | 36,083 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and other short term borrowings |
37,953 | 37,953 | 49,179 | 49,179 | ||||||||||||
Securities and loans purchased but not yet received |
171,813 | 171,813 | 413,359 | 413,359 | ||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
38,216 | 38,216 | 31,650 | 31,650 |
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of significant
financial instruments at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
| Cash and cash equivalents, money market investments, time deposits with other banks, securities sold but not yet delivered, accrued interest receivable and payable, securities and loans purchased but not yet received, federal funds purchased, accrued expenses and other liabilities have been valued at the carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated statements of financial condition as these are reasonable estimates of fair value given the short-term nature of the instruments. | ||
| Investments in FHLB stock are valued at their redemption value. | ||
| The fair value of investment securities is based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices provided by recognized broker dealers. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon externally developed models that use both observable and unobservable inputs depending on the market activity of the instrument. The estimated fair value of the structured credit investments and the non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations are determined by using a third-party cash flow valuation model to calculate the present value of projected future cash flows. The assumptions used, which are highly uncertain and require a high degree of judgment, include primarily market discount rates, current spreads, duration, leverage, default, home price depreciation, and loss rates. The assumptions used are drawn from a wide array of data sources, including the performance of the collateral underlying each deal. The external-based valuation, which is obtained at least on a quarterly basis, is analyzed and its assumptions are evaluated and incorporated in either an internal-based valuation model when deemed necessary or compared to counterparties prices and agreed by management. |
33
Table of Contents
| The fair values of the derivative instruments are provided by valuation experts and counterparties. Certain derivatives with limited market activity are valued using externally developed models that consider unobservable market parameters. The Group offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index (S&P Index), and uses equity indexed option agreements with major broker-dealer companies to manage its exposure to changes in this index. Their fair value is obtained through the use of an external based valuation that was thoroughly evaluated and adopted by management as its measurement tool for these options. The payoff of these options is linked to the average value of the S&P Index on a specific set of dates during the life of the option. The methodology uses an average rate option or a cash-settled option whose payoff is based on the difference between the expected average value of the S&P Index during the remaining life of the option and the strike price at inception. The assumptions, which are uncertain and require a degree of judgment, include primarily S&P Index volatility, forward interest rate projections, estimated index dividend payout, and leverage. | ||
| The fair value of the loan portfolio (including loans held-for-sale) is estimated by segregating by type, such as mortgage, commercial and consumer. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable interest rates and by performing and non-performing categories. The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows, adjusted for prepayment estimates, if any, using estimated current market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan, which is not currently an indication of an exit price. An exit price valuation approach could result in a different fair value estimate. | ||
| The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of the contractual cash flows, using estimated current market discount rates for deposits of similar remaining maturities. | ||
| For short-term borrowings, the carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value. The subordinated capital note has a par value of $36.1 million, bears interest based on 3-month LIBOR plus 295 basis points (3.21% at March 31, 2010; 3.20% at December 31, 2009), payable quarterly. The fair value of long-term borrowings is based on the discounted value of the contractual cash flows, using current estimated market discount rates for borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities and put dates. | ||
| The fair value of commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit is based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties credit standings. | ||
| The fair value of servicing assets is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions. |
NOTE 14 SEGMENT REPORTING
The Group segregates its businesses into the following major reportable segments of business:
Banking, Financial Services, and Treasury. Management established the reportable segments based on
the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources.
Other factors such as the Groups organization, nature of its products, distribution channels and
economic characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of the
reportable segments. The Group measures the performance of these reportable segments based on
pre-established goals of different financial parameters such as net income, net interest income,
loan production, and fees generated. Non-interest expenses allocations among segments were reviewed
during the second quarter of 2009 to reallocate expenses from the Banking to the Financial Services
and Treasury segments for a suitable presentation. The Groups methodology for allocating
non-interest expenses among segments is based on several factors such as revenues, employee
headcount, occupied space, dedicated services or time, among others. These factors are reviewed on
a periodical basis and may change if the conditions warrant.
Banking includes the Banks branches and mortgage banking, with traditional banking products such
as deposits and mortgage, commercial and consumer loans. Mortgage banking activities are carried
out by the Banks mortgage banking division, whose principal activity is to originate mortgage
loans for the Groups own portfolio. As part of its mortgage banking activities, the Group may sell
loans directly into the secondary market or securitize conforming loans into mortgage-backed
securities.
34
Table of Contents
Financial services are comprised of the Banks trust division (Oriental Trust), the broker dealer
subsidiary (Oriental Financial Services Corp.), the insurance agency subsidiary (Oriental
Insurance, Inc.), and the pension plan administration subsidiary (Caribbean Pension Consultants,
Inc.). The core operations of this segment are financial planning, money management and investment
banking, brokerage services, insurance sales activity, corporate and individual trust and
retirement services, as well as pension plan administration services.
The Treasury segment encompasses all of the Groups asset and liability management activities such
as: purchases and sales of investment securities, interest rate risk management, derivatives, and
borrowings. Intersegment sales and transfers, if any, are accounted for as if the sales or
transfers were to third parties, that is, at current market prices. The accounting policies of the
segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
included Groups annual report on Form 10-K. Following are the results of operations and the
selected financial information by operating segment as of and for the quarters ended March 31, 2010
and 2009:
Unaudited (thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial | Total Major | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | Banking | Services | Treasury | Segments | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 17,598 | $ | 4 | $ | 52,695 | $ | 70,297 | $ | | $ | 70,297 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(8,271 | ) | | (32,588 | ) | (40,859 | ) | | (40,859 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
9,327 | 4 | 20,107 | 29,438 | | 29,438 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
(4,014 | ) | | | (4,014 | ) | | (4,014 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest income |
2,522 | 4,803 | 752 | 8,077 | | 8,077 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
(13,193 | ) | (3,200 | ) | (4,000 | ) | (20,393 | ) | | (20,393 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intersegment revenue |
344 | 822 | | 1,166 | (1,166 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment expense |
| (1,136 | ) | (30 | ) | (1,166 | ) | 1,166 | | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (5,014 | ) | $ | 1,293 | $ | 16,829 | $ | 13,108 | $ | | $ | 13,108 | |||||||||||
Total assets as of March 31, 2010 |
$ | 1,967,184 | $ | 11,080 | $ | 5,005,051 | $ | 6,983,315 | $ | (474,795 | ) | $ | 6,508,520 | |||||||||||
Unaudited (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial | Total Major | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 | Banking | Services | Treasury | Segments | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 18,318 | $ | 15 | $ | 65,598 | $ | 83,931 | $ | | $ | 83,931 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(8,313 | ) | | (44,953 | ) | (53,266 | ) | | (53,266 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
10,005 | 15 | 20,645 | 30,665 | | 30,665 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
(3,200 | ) | | | (3,200 | ) | | (3,200 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest income |
3,383 | 3,089 | 10,774 | 17,246 | | 17,246 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
(15,615 | ) | (2,621 | ) | (1,037 | ) | (19,273 | ) | | (19,273 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intersegment revenue |
334 | | | 334 | (334 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment expense |
| (280 | ) | (54 | ) | (334 | ) | 334 | | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (5,093 | ) | $ | 203 | $ | 30,328 | $ | 25,438 | $ | | $ | 25,438 | |||||||||||
Total assets as of March 31, 2009 |
$ | 1,576,054 | $ | 10,046 | $ | 5,199,658 | $ | 6,785,758 | $ | (299,812 | ) | $ | 6,485,946 | |||||||||||
35
Table of Contents
NOTE
15 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Acquisition
of Certain Assets and Assumption of Deposits of Eurobank
On April 30, 2010, Oriental Financial Group Inc. (the Group) announced that its commercial
bank subsidiary, Oriental Bank and Trust (Oriental Bank), acquired all of the retail deposits, certain assets and substantially all of the operations of Eurobank, a Puerto Rico commercial bank (Eurobank),
from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC), as receiver of Eurobank (the
Acquisition), pursuant to the terms of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement - Whole Bank, All
Deposits, dated as of April 30, 2010, between Oriental Bank and the FDIC (the Agreement).
Under the Agreement, Oriental Bank assumed approximately $785 million in retail deposits,
paying a premium of 1.25% on approximately $400 million in core retail deposits, and acquired
approximately $1.7 billion of assets (including approximately $1.58 billion portfolio of single-family
residential and commercial loans) at a discount of 13.8%. These loans are subject to a loss sharing
arrangement pursuant to which the FDIC will bear 80% of qualifying losses, beginning with the first
dollar amount of qualifying losses (see Loss Sharing Arrangements below).
In consideration for the excess assets acquired over liabilities assumed (taking into account the
deposit premium and asset discount described above), Oriental Bank
paid $100 million in cash on May 4,
2010 to the FDIC and issued to the FDIC a secured promissory note (the Note) in the amount of
$715.5 million, which is fully recourse to Oriental Bank. The Note is secured by the loans acquired from
Eurobank under the Agreement and all proceeds derived from such loans. The entire outstanding
principal balance of the Note is due one year from issuance, or such earlier date as such amount may
become due and payable pursuant to the terms of the Note. Oriental Bank may extend the Notes
maturity date for up to four additional one-year periods, subject to the notice requirements set forth
therein. Oriental Bank must pay interest in arrears on the Note at the Note Interest Rate (defined below)
on the twenty-fifth day of each month or, if such day is not a business day, the next succeeding day that is
a business day, commencing June 25, 2010, on the principal amount of the Note outstanding from time to
time. Interest will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months.
Borrowings under the Note bear interest at the per annum rate of 0.881%, and with respect to any renewal
period, shall equal the sum of (a) 0.50% plus (b) the rate, determined by the FDIC on the business day
immediately preceding the commencement of such renewal period, equal to the rate on United States
Treasury Bills with a maturity of one year (the Note Interest Rate). Should Oriental Bank fail to pay
any interest as and when due under the Note, such interest will accrue interest at the Note Interest Rate
plus 2.00% per annum.
Payments with respect to the Note will be made by Citibank, N.A., as paying agent on behalf of
Oriental Bank, from a newly-created custodial account into which payments on the acquired loans,
including loss sharing payments, will be deposited. The Note may be voluntarily prepaid, in whole or in
part, without penalty (subject to the notice requirements set forth therein) and is subject to mandatory
prepayment. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the collateral agent may declare the Note to be
immediately due and payable, provided that with respect to an event of default resulting from the
occurrence of certain insolvency events, the Note will automatically become immediately due and
payable without further act of the collateral agent or the holder of the Note. Events of default include a
change of control, the occurrence of an insolvency event, a material adverse change in the financial
conditions or operations of Oriental Bank, a default on any payment due under the Note and a breach of
representations, warranties or other covenants, each as set forth in the Security Agreement, dated as of
April 30, 2010, between Oriental Bank and the FDIC, as initial holder of the Note and as collateral agent.
In addition, as part of the consideration for the Acquisition, the Group issued to the FDIC a value
appreciation instrument (VAI). Under the terms of the VAI, the FDIC has the opportunity to obtain a
cash payment equal to the product of (a) 334,000 and (b) the amount by which the average of the volume
weighted average price of the Groups common stock for each of the two NYSE trading days immediately
prior to the exercise of the VAI exceeds $14.95. The VAI is exercisable by the FDIC, in whole or in part,
from and including May 7, 2010 through and including July 6, 2010.
All of Eurobanks 22 banking offices located in Puerto Rico have reopened as
branches of Oriental Bank. The physical branch locations and leases were not immediately acquired by
Oriental Bank in the Acquisition. Oriental Bank has an option, exercisable for 90 days following the
closing of the Acquisition, to acquire at fair market value any bank premises that were owned by, or
assume any leases relating to bank premises leased by, Eurobank (including ATM locations). Oriental
Bank is currently reviewing the bank premises and related leases of Eurobank. In addition, Oriental Bank
has an option, exercisable for 30 days following the closing of the Acquisition, to elect to assume or reject
any contracts that provided for the rendering of services by or to Eurobank and must perform under all
such contracts for 90 days with respect to contracts pursuant to which Eurobank provided services and 30
days with respect to contracts pursuant to which services were provided to Eurobank. Oriental Bank also
has an option, exercisable for 90 days following the closing of the Acquisition, to accept the assignment
of any leases with respect to data processing equipment held by Eurobank.
The Group is in the process of evaluating the
accounting and valuation effects of this transaction.
Loss
Sharing Arrangements
In connection with the Acquisition, Oriental Bank entered into loss sharing agreements with the
FDIC (included as exhibits to the Agreement). Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the
FDICs obligation to reimburse Oriental Bank for losses with respect to assets covered by such
agreements (collectively, covered assets) begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. On a combined
basis, the FDIC will reimburse Oriental Bank for 80% of all qualifying losses with respect to covered
assets. Oriental Bank will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of qualifying recoveries with respect to losses for
which the FDIC reimbursed Oriental Bank. The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family
residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss sharing and Oriental Bank reimbursement to the FDIC
to last for ten years, and the loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial and other assets provides for
FDIC loss sharing and Oriental Bank reimbursement to the FDIC to last for five years, with additional
recovery sharing for three years thereafter.
The FDIC has certain rights to withhold loss sharing payments if Oriental Bank does not perform
its obligations under the loss sharing agreements in accordance with their terms and to withdraw the loss
share protection if certain significant transactions are effected without FDIC consent, including certain
business combination transactions and sales of shares by our shareholders, some of which may be beyond
the Groups control.
Preferred
and Common Stock
On April 30, 2010, the Group sold $200.0 million of its Mandatorily Convertible Non-Cumulative
Non-Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, through a private placement. The preferred stock
has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and, subject to approval of the Groups
stockholders, the Series C preferred stock will be convertible into shares of common stock at a
conversion price of $15.015 per share. The Group intends to seek stockholder approval at a special
stockholders meeting to be held as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 75 days after
the closing of the purchase of the Series C preferred stock, to provide for such convertibility.
The series C preferred stock were offered and sold in private transactions and will not be and have
not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be offered or sold in
the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.
At the annual meeting of stockholders held on April 30, 2010, a majority of the outstanding shares
entitled to vote approved an increase of the authorized number of shares of common stock, par value
$1.00 per share, from 40,000,000 to 100,000,000 and the authorized number of shares of preferred
stock, par value $1.00 per share, from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000.
36
Table of Contents
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | ||||||||||
EARNINGS DATA: |
||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 70,297 | $ | 83,931 | -16.2 | % | ||||||
Interest expense |
40,859 | 53,266 | -23.3 | % | ||||||||
Net interest income |
29,438 | 30,665 | -4.0 | % | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
4,014 | 3,200 | 25.4 | % | ||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
25,424 | 27,465 | -7.4 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest income (loss) |
8,077 | 17,246 | -53.2 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
20,393 | 19,273 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes |
13,108 | 25,438 | -48.5 | % | ||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
1,172 | 690 | 69.9 | % | ||||||||
Net Income (loss) |
11,936 | 24,748 | -51.8 | % | ||||||||
Less: dividends on preferred stock |
(1,201 | ) | (1,201 | ) | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Income available (loss) to common shareholders |
$ | 10,735 | $ | 23,547 | -54.4 | % | ||||||
PER SHARE DATA: |
||||||||||||
Earnings per common shares (basic) |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.97 | -56.7 | % | ||||||
Earnings per common shares (diluted) |
$ | 0.41 | $ | 0.97 | -57.7 | % | ||||||
Average common shares outstanding |
25,857 | 24,245 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||
Average potential common share-options |
75 | 3 | 2400.0 | % | ||||||||
Average shares and shares equivalents |
25,932 | 24,248 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||
Book value per common share |
$ | 11.97 | $ | 10.38 | 15.3 | % | ||||||
Market price at end of period |
$ | 13.50 | $ | 4.88 | 176.6 | % | ||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Cash dividends declared on common shares |
$ | 1,322 | $ | 972 | 36.0 | % | ||||||
Return on average assets (ROA) |
0.73 | % | 1.53 | % | -52.3 | % | ||||||
Return on average common equity (ROE) |
13.39 | % | 49.14 | % | -72.8 | % | ||||||
Equity-to-assets ratio |
7.13 | % | 4.92 | % | 44.9 | % | ||||||
Efficiency ratio |
55.33 | % | 51.65 | % | 7.1 | % | ||||||
Expense ratio |
0.83 | % | 0.82 | % | 1.2 | % | ||||||
Interest rate spread |
1.62 | % | 1.79 | % | -9.5 | % | ||||||
Number of financial centers |
21 | 23 | -8.7 | % | ||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | ||||||||||
PERIOD END BALANCES AND CAPITAL RATIOS: |
||||||||||||
Investments and loans |
||||||||||||
Investment securities |
$ | 4,637,199 | $ | 4,974,269 | -6.8 | % | ||||||
Loans and leases (including loans held-for-sale), net |
1,131,279 | 1,140,069 | -0.8 | % | ||||||||
Securities sold but not yet delivered |
116,747 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
$ | 5,885,225 | $ | 6,114,338 | -3.7 | % | |||||||
Deposits and Borrowings |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 1,816,333 | $ | 1,745,501 | 4.1 | % | ||||||
Repurchase agreements |
3,557,149 | 3,557,308 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Other borrowings |
460,835 | 472,849 | -2.5 | % | ||||||||
Securities purchased but not yet received |
171,813 | 413,359 | -58.4 | % | ||||||||
$ | 6,006,130 | $ | 6,189,017 | -3.0 | % | |||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||||||
Preferred equity |
$ | 68,000 | $ | 68,000 | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Common equity |
396,174 | 262,166 | 51.1 | % | ||||||||
$ | 464,174 | $ | 330,166 | 40.6 | % | |||||||
Capital ratios |
||||||||||||
Leverage capital |
7.82 | % | 6.52 | % | 19.9 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
23.55 | % | 18.79 | % | 25.3 | % | ||||||
Total risk-based capital |
24.73 | % | 19.84 | % | 24.6 | % | ||||||
Trust assets managed |
$ | 1,688,831 | $ | 1,818,498 | -7.1 | % | ||||||
Broker-dealer assets gathered |
1,301,080 | 1,269,284 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
Assets managed |
2,989,911 | 3,087,782 | -3.2 | % | ||||||||
Assets owned |
6,508,520 | 6,550,833 | -0.6 | % | ||||||||
Total financial assets managed and owned |
$ | 9,498,431 | $ | 9,638,615 | -1.5 | % | ||||||
37
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Introduction
The Groups diversified mix of businesses and products generates both the interest income
traditionally associated with a banking institution and non-interest income traditionally
associated with a financial services institution (generated by such businesses as securities
brokerage, fiduciary services, investment banking, insurance and pension administration). Although
all of these businesses, to varying degrees, are affected by interest rate and financial markets
fluctuations and other external factors, the Groups commitment is to continue producing a balanced
and growing revenue stream.
From time to time, the Group uses certain non-GAAP measures of financial performance to supplement
the financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP. The Group presents non-GAAP measures
when its management believes that the additional information is useful and meaningful to investors.
Non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning and are therefore unlikely to be comparable
to similar measures presented by other companies. The presentation of non-GAAP measures is not
intended to be a substitute for, and should not be considered in isolation from, the financial
measures reported in accordance with GAAP. The Groups management has reported and discussed the
results of operations herein both on a GAAP basis and on a pre-tax operating income basis. The
Groups management believes that, given the nature of the items excluded from the definition of
pre-tax operating income, it is useful to state what the results of operations would have been
without them so that investors can see the financial trends from the Groups continuing business.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Group continued to perform well in a very challenging
environment from both a financial and credit point of view. Highlights of the quarter included:
| Significant improvement in capital. As of March 31, 2010, total stockholders equity of $464.2 million increased 40.6% from December 31, 2009, book value per common share of $11.97 rose 10.6%, and tangible common equity to tangible assets of 6.06% improved 209 basis points. This reflects, among other factors, net proceeds of approximately $94.5 million from the Groups March 2010 common stock offering. |
| Steady commercial and mortgage loan origination. Oriental produced a total of $74.6 million of loans during the quarter, reflecting $52.3 million in residential mortgage originations and $20.1 million in commercial originations. |
| Minor reduction in net interest income. Net interest income of $29.4 million was 4% lower than the year ago quarter. This reflected the sales of structured credit investments and non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations in December 2009 and January 2010, respectively, and lower yields from holding a greater amount of assets in cash in line with the Groups strategy of preparing for rising interest rates. |
| Continued growth in core retail deposits. These deposits increased 5.8%, or $81.1 million, sequentially and 24.6%, or $293.9 million, year over year, and contributed to a reduction in cost of funds. At the same time, Oriental reduced brokered deposits to $144.9 million, representing declines of $58.4 million sequentially and $307.4 million year over year. |
| Strong non-interest income in the face of a challenging local economy. Core non-interest income increased 11.6% year over year, to $7.4 million, reflecting increases in both financial and banking service revenues. |
| Net credit losses remain low. Net credit losses at $1.3 million fell 44.2% year over year and dropped to 0.46% of average loans outstanding compared to 0.78%. The allowance for loan losses stood at $26.0 million (2.24% of total loans) at March 31, 2010, compared to $15.1 million (1.25% of total loans) at March 31, 2009. |
| Control over non-interest expenses. Non-interest expenses of $20.4 million declined 4.7% sequentially and increased only $1.1 million year over year, largely due to higher FDIC insurance premiums, which were instituted industry wide in the third quarter of 2009. |
38
Table of Contents
Other Financial Data
| Total loans, net, at $1.13 billion, declined marginally from $1.14 billion in the preceding quarter, reflecting pay down of residential mortgages and an increase in commercial loans. The Group sells most of its conforming mortgages, which represented approximately 90% of first quarter production, into the secondary market, and retains servicing rights. |
| Non-performing loans increased $4.9 million from the preceding quarter. The Groups non-performing loans generally reflect the economic environment in Puerto Rico. The Group does not expect non-performing loans to result in significantly higher losses as most are well-collateralized with adequate loan-to-value ratios. |
| Total investments of $4.6 billion at March 31, 2010 declined 6.8% from December 31, 2009, reflecting the sales of structured credit investments and non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations in the December 2009 and January 2010, respectively. Approximately 96% of the Groups portfolio consists of fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities or notes, guaranteed or issued by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA, and U.S. agency senior debt obligations, backed by a U.S. government sponsored entity or the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. |
| Non-core, non-interest income of $0.7 million, primarily reflecting gains on sales of securities of $12.0 million and a loss on derivative activities of $10.6 million as a result of negative valuations on existing interest rate swaps. |
| The Group maintains regulatory capital ratios well above the requirements for a well-capitalized institution. At March 31, 2010, the Leverage Capital Ratio was 7.82%, Tier-1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio was 23.55%, and Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio was 24.73%. |
| Common shares outstanding at March 31, 2010 of 33.1 million increased 8.9 million from December 31, 2009, reflecting the Groups March 2010 offering. |
Income Available to Common Shareholders
For the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, the Groups income available to common shareholders
totaled $10.7 million, or $0.42 and $0.41 per basic and diluted share, respectively. This compares
to $23.5 million, or $0.97 per basic and diluted share, which benefited from non-core,
non-interest income of $10.6 million, primarily from gains on sales of securities.
Return on Average Assets and Common Equity
Return on average common equity (ROE) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was 13.39%, down from
49.14% for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Return on average assets (ROA) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 was 0.73%, down from 1.53% for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Decrease is mostly
due to a 51.8% decrease in net income from $24.7 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 to
$11.9 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2010. In addition, decrease in ROE is also due to a
67.3% increase in average common equity from $191.7 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 to
$320.7 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses decreased 7.4% for the quarter ended March 31,
2010, totaling $25.4 million, compared with $27.5 million last year. This reflected the sale of
non-agency securities in December 2009 and January 2010, and lower yields from holding a greater
amount of assets in cash in line with the Groups strategy of preparing for rising interest rates.
Non-Interest Expenses
Non-interest expenses increased 5.8% to $20.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010,
compared to $19.3 million in the previous year quarter, largely the result of the industry-wide
increase in FDIC insurance assessments, resulting in an efficiency ratio of 55.3% for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 (compared to 51.65% for the quarter ended March 31, 2009).
Income Tax Expense
As a result of increased operating income, investment gains, and income tax rates for financial
institutions and international banking entities doing business in Puerto Rico, the income tax
expense was $1.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared to $690 thousand in the
quarter ended March 31, 2009.
39
Table of Contents
Assets Managed
Assets managed by the trust division, the pension plan administration subsidiary, and the
broker-dealer subsidiary decreased from $3.088 billion as of December 31, 2009 to $2.990 billion as
of March 31, 2010. The Groups trust division offers various types of individual retirement
accounts (IRA) and manages 401(K) and Keogh retirement plans and custodian and corporate trust
accounts, while Caribbean Pension Consultants, Inc. (CPC) manages the administration of private
pension plans. At March 31, 2010, total assets managed by the Groups trust division and CPC
amounted to $1.689 billion, compared to $1.819 billion at December 31, 2009. This decrease is
mostly due to a strategic decision made to let go of custody assets below expected
profitability levels. The Groups broker-dealer subsidiary offers a wide array of investment
alternatives to its client base, such as tax-advantaged fixed income securities, mutual funds,
stocks, bonds and money management wrap-fee programs. At March 31, 2010, total assets gathered by
the broker-dealer from its customer investment accounts increased to $1.301 billion, compared to
$1.269 billion at December 31, 2009.
Interest Earning Assets
The investment portfolio amounted to $4.637 billion at March 31, 2010, a 6.8% decrease compared to
$4.974 billion at December 31, 2009, which reflected the sale of non-agency securities in January
2010. The loan portfolio decreased 0.8% to $1.131 billion at March 31, 2010, compared to $1.140
billion at December 31, 2009.
The mortgage loan portfolio totaled $906.3 million at March 31, 2010, a 1.4% decrease from $918.9
million at December 31, 2009. Mortgage loan production for the quarter ended March 31, 2010,
totaled $52.3 million, which represents a decrease of 20.4% from the preceding year quarter. The
Group sells most of its conforming mortgages, which represented approximately 90% of first quarter
production, into the secondary market, and retains servicing rights.
Interest Bearing Liabilities
Total deposits amounted to $1.816 billion at March 31, 2010, an increase of 4.1% compared to $1.746
billion at December 31, 2009, primarily due to an increase in savings, demand deposits, and
institutional deposits; partially offset by a decrease in brokered deposits.
Stockholders Equity
On March 19, 2010, the Group completed an underwritten public offering of 8,740,000 shares of its
common stock. The offering resulted in net proceeds of $94.5 million after deducting offering
costs. The net proceeds of this offering were intended for general corporate purposes, which
included funding organic and acquisition growth opportunities (including the Group's participation in government assisted transactions in Puerto Rico), and contributing a portion of
such proceeds in the form of capital to Oriental Bank and Trust, which used such amount to
bolster its regulatory capital needs and for general corporate purposes.
At March 31, 2010, the Groups total stockholders equity was $464.2 million, a 45.3% increase,
when compared to $330.2 million at December 31, 2009. This increase reflects the aforementioned
issuance of stock, the net income for the quarter, and an improvement of approximately $33.0
million in the fair value of the investment securities portfolio.
The Group maintains capital ratios in excess of regulatory requirements. At March 31, 2010, Tier 1
Leverage Capital Ratio was 7.82% (1.96 times the requirement of 4.00%), Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital
Ratio was 23.55% (5.89 times the requirement of 4.00%), and Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio was
24.73% (3.09 times the requirement of 8.00%).
Financial Service-Banking Franchise
The Groups niche market approach to the integrated delivery of services to mid and high net worth
clients performed well, based on its service proposition and capital strength, as opposed to using
rates to attract loans or deposits.
Lending
Total loan production and purchases of $78.1 million for the quarter remained steady, as the
Groups capital levels and low credit losses enabled it to continue prudent lending. The average
FICO score was 726 and the average loan to value ratio was 84% on residential mortgage loans
originated in the quarter.
The Group sells most of its conforming mortgages, which represented approximately 90% of March 31,
2010 quarter production, into the secondary market, and retains servicing rights. As a result,
mortgage banking activities now reflect originations as well as a growing servicing portfolio, a
source of recurring revenue.
40
Table of Contents
Deposits
Growth in retail deposits primarily reflects increases in demand and savings deposits of $58.1
million in the quarter. The Group also reduced brokered deposits by $58.4 million and increased
institutional deposits by $48.1 million in the quarter.
Assets Under Management
Total client assets managed decreased 3.2%, to $2.990 billion as of March 31, 2010, mostly due to a
strategic decision made to let go of custody assets below expected profitability levels.
Credit Quality
Net credit losses remained low. At $1.3 million, these fell 44% year over year and dropped to 0.46%
of average loans outstanding.
Non-performing loans (NPLs) increased 26.3% or $4.9 million in the quarter. The Groups NPLs
generally reflect the economic environment in Puerto Rico. Nonetheless, the Group does not expect
non-performing loans to result in significantly higher losses as most are well-collateralized with
adequate loan-to-value ratios. In residential mortgage lending, more than 90% of the Groups
portfolio consists of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, fully documented loans that do not have the
level of risk generally associated with subprime loans. In commercial lending, more than 90% of all
loans are collateralized by real estate.
The Investment Securities Portfolio
Treasury activities encompass all of the Groups treasury-related functions. The Groups investment
portfolio consists of mortgage-backed securities, obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
agencies, Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations, structured investments, and money market
instruments. Agency mortgage-backed securities, the largest component, consist principally of pools
of residential mortgage loans that are made to consumers and then resold in the form of
pass-through certificates in the secondary market, the payment of interest and principal of which
is guaranteed by GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC.
Results for the year included gains on: (i) sales of agency securities of $12.0 million, and losses
on: (ii) derivative activities of $10.6 million. This loss on derivative activities was the result
of the decline in long rates, reflecting a non-cash loss on valuation of $10.6 million on the
forward settled interest rate swaps. This essentially reversed the valuation gain from the
preceding quarter of about $9 million. The purpose of these
swaps is to partially offset any decline in value the Group might
experience on the investment securities portfolio.
Also during January 2010, the Group made the strategic decision to sell $374.3 million of
non-agency CMOs which contemplated a loss of $45.8 million. This loss was accounted for as other
than temporary impairment in the fourth quarter of 2009 and no additional gain or loss was realized
on the sale in January 2010, since these assets were sold at the same value reflected at December
31, 2009.
After giving effect to the aforementioned transaction, approximately 96% of the Groups portfolio
consists of fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities or notes, guaranteed or issued by FNMA, FHLMC or
GNMA, and U.S. agency senior debt obligations, backed by a U.S. government sponsored entity or the
full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
41
Table of Contents
Subsequent events
Acquisition
of Certain Assets and Assumption of Deposits of Eurobank
On April 30, 2010, Oriental Financial Group Inc. (the Group) announced that its commercial bank
subsidiary, Oriental Bank and Trust (Oriental Bank), acquired all of the retail deposits, certain
assets and substantially all of the operations of Eurobank, a Puerto Rico commercial bank
(Eurobank), from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC), as receiver of Eurobank
(the Acquisition), pursuant to the terms of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement Whole Bank,
All Deposits, dated as of April 30, 2010, between Oriental Bank and the FDIC (the Agreement).
Under the Agreement, Oriental Bank assumed approximately $785 million in retail deposits, paying a
premium of 1.25% on approximately $400 million in core retail deposits, and acquired approximately
$1.7 billion of assets (including approximately $1.58 billion portfolio of single-family
residential and commercial loans) at a discount of 13.8%. These loans are subject to a loss
sharing arrangement pursuant to which the FDIC will bear 80% of qualifying losses, beginning with
the first dollar amount of qualifying losses (see Loss Sharing Arrangements below).
In consideration for the excess assets acquired over liabilities assumed (taking into account the
deposit premium and asset discount described above), Oriental Bank
paid $100 million in cash on May
4, 2010 to the FDIC and issued to the FDIC a secured promissory note (the Note) in the amount of
$715.5 million, which is fully recourse to Oriental Bank. The Note is secured by the loans
acquired from Eurobank under the Agreement and all proceeds derived from such loans. The entire
outstanding principal balance of the Note is due one year from issuance, or such earlier date as
such amount may become due and payable pursuant to the terms of the Note. Oriental Bank may extend
the Notes maturity date for up to four additional one-year periods, subject to the notice
requirements set forth therein. Oriental Bank must pay interest in arrears on the Note at the Note
Interest Rate (defined below) on the twenty-fifth day of each month or, if such day is not a
business day, the next succeeding day that is a business day, commencing June 25, 2010, on the
principal amount of the Note outstanding from time to time. Interest will be calculated on the
basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Borrowings under the Note bear
interest at the per annum rate of 0.881%, and with respect to any renewal period, shall equal the
sum of (a) 0.50% plus (b) the rate, determined by the FDIC on the business day immediately
preceding the commencement of such renewal period, equal to the rate on United States Treasury
Bills with a maturity of one year (the Note Interest Rate). Should Oriental Bank fail to pay any
interest as and when due under the Note, such interest will accrue interest at the Note Interest
Rate plus 2.00% per annum.
Payments with respect to the Note will be made by Citibank, N.A., as paying agent on behalf of
Oriental Bank, from a newly-created custodial account into which payments on the acquired loans,
including loss sharing payments, will be deposited. The Note may be voluntarily prepaid, in whole
or in part, without penalty (subject to the notice requirements set forth therein) and is subject
to mandatory prepayment. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the collateral agent may
declare the Note to be immediately due and payable, provided that with respect to an event of
default resulting from the occurrence of certain insolvency events, the Note will automatically
become immediately due and payable without further act of the collateral agent or the holder of the
Note. Events of default include a change of control, the occurrence of an insolvency event, a
material adverse change in the financial conditions or operations of Oriental Bank, a default on
any payment due under the Note and a breach of representations, warranties or other covenants, each
as set forth in the Security Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2010, between Oriental Bank and the
FDIC, as initial holder of the Note and as collateral agent.
In addition, as part of the consideration for the Acquisition, the Group issued to the FDIC a value
appreciation instrument (VAI). Under the terms of the VAI, the FDIC has the opportunity to
obtain a cash payment equal to the product of (a) 334,000 and (b) the amount by which the average
of the volume weighted average price of the Groups common stock for each of the two NYSE trading
days immediately
prior to the exercise of the VAI exceeds $14.95. The VAI is exercisable by the FDIC, in whole or
in part, from and including May 7, 2010 through and including July 6, 2010.
All of Eurobanks 22 banking offices located in Puerto Rico have reopened as
branches of Oriental Bank. The physical branch locations and leases were not immediately acquired
by Oriental Bank in the Acquisition. Oriental Bank has an option, exercisable for 90 days
following the closing of the Acquisition, to acquire at fair market value any bank premises that
were owned by, or assume any leases relating to bank premises leased by, Eurobank (including ATM
locations). Oriental Bank is currently reviewing the bank premises and related leases of Eurobank.
In addition, Oriental Bank has an option, exercisable for 30 days following the closing of the
Acquisition, to elect to assume or reject any contracts that provided for the rendering of services
by or to Eurobank and must perform under all such contracts for 90 days with respect to contracts
pursuant to which Eurobank provided services and 30 days with respect to contracts pursuant to
which services were provided to Eurobank. Oriental Bank also has an option, exercisable for 90
days following the closing of the Acquisition, to accept the assignment of any leases with respect
to data processing equipment held by Eurobank.
The Group is in the process of evaluating the accounting and valuation effects of this transaction.
Loss Sharing Arrangements
In connection with the Acquisition, Oriental Bank entered into loss sharing agreements with the
FDIC (included as exhibits to the Agreement). Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing
agreements, the FDICs obligation to reimburse Oriental Bank for losses with respect to assets
covered by such agreements (collectively, covered assets) begins with the first dollar of loss
incurred. On a combined basis, the FDIC will reimburse Oriental Bank for 80% of all qualifying
losses with respect to covered assets. Oriental Bank will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of qualifying
recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC reimbursed Oriental Bank. The loss sharing
agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss sharing and
Oriental Bank reimbursement to the FDIC to last for ten years, and the loss sharing agreement
applicable to commercial and other assets provides for FDIC loss sharing and Oriental Bank
reimbursement to the FDIC to last for five years, with additional recovery sharing for three years
thereafter.
The FDIC has certain rights to withhold loss sharing payments if Oriental Bank does not perform its
obligations under the loss sharing agreements in accordance with their terms and to withdraw the
loss share protection if certain significant transactions are effected without FDIC consent,
including certain business combination transactions and sales of shares by our shareholders, some
of which may be beyond the Groups control.
Preferred
and Common Stock
On April 30, 2010, the Group sold $200.0 million of its Mandatorily Convertible Non-Cumulative
Non-Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, through a private placement. The preferred stock
has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and, subject to approval of the Groups
stockholders; the preferred stock will be convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion
price of $15.015 per share. The Group intends to seek stockholder approval at a special
stockholders meeting to be held as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 75 days after
the closing of the purchase of the preferred stock, to allow the conversion of the shares of
preferred stock into common stock. The securities were offered and sold in private transactions and
will not be and have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not
be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from
registration requirements.
During the stockholders annual meeting held on April 30, 2010, a majority of the shareholders
entitled to vote, approved to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock, par value
$1.00 per share, from 40,000,000 to 100,000,000 and the authorized number of shares of preferred
stock, par value $1.00 per share, from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000.
42
Table of Contents
TABLE 1 ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME AND CHANGES DUE TO VOLUME/RATE:
For the Quarters Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
For the Quarters Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Interest | Average rate | Average balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
A TAX EQUIVALENT SPREAD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets |
$ | 70,297 | $ | 83,931 | 4.50 | % | 5.43 | % | $ | 6,246,449 | $ | 6,183,981 | ||||||||||||
Tax equivalent adjustment |
23,193 | 26,035 | 1.49 | % | 1.68 | % | | | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets tax equivalent |
93,490 | 109,966 | 5.99 | % | 7.11 | % | 6,246,449 | 6,183,981 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities |
40,859 | 53,266 | 2.88 | % | 3.64 | % | 5,676,975 | 5,848,697 | ||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income / spread |
$ | 52,631 | $ | 56,700 | 3.11 | % | 3.47 | % | $ | 569,474 | $ | 335,284 | ||||||||||||
Tax equivalent interest rate margin |
3.37 | % | 3.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
B NORMAL SPREAD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
$ | 52,657 | $ | 65,431 | 4.17 | % | 5.34 | % | $ | 5,054,427 | $ | 4,903,567 | ||||||||||||
Trading securities |
2 | 10 | 4.31 | % | 11.39 | % | 371 | 527 | ||||||||||||||||
Money market investments |
40 | 170 | 0.31 | % | 0.89 | % | 51,540 | 76,151 | ||||||||||||||||
52,699 | 65,611 | 4.13 | % | 5.27 | % | 5,106,338 | 4,980,245 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
14,391 | 15,498 | 6.21 | % | 6.21 | % | 927,573 | 998,506 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
2,727 | 2,310 | 5.70 | % | 5.02 | % | 191,338 | 184,157 | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
480 | 512 | 9.06 | % | 9.74 | % | 21,200 | 21,073 | ||||||||||||||||
17,598 | 18,320 | 6.17 | % | 6.09 | % | 1,140,111 | 1,203,736 | |||||||||||||||||
70,297 | 83,931 | 4.50 | % | 5.43 | % | 6,246,449 | 6,183,981 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
| | | | 59,049 | 38,728 | ||||||||||||||||||
Now accounts |
3,495 | 3,592 | 2.24 | % | 3.23 | % | 625,150 | 444,381 | ||||||||||||||||
Savings |
409 | 161 | 1.69 | % | 1.23 | % | 96,872 | 52,135 | ||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
7,339 | 10,070 | 3.34 | % | 3.49 | % | 877,853 | 1,154,056 | ||||||||||||||||
11,243 | 13,823 | 2.71 | % | 3.27 | % | 1,658,924 | 1,689,300 | |||||||||||||||||
Borrowings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
25,285 | 35,799 | 2.85 | % | 3.81 | % | 3,550,000 | 3,754,817 | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
2,966 | 2,999 | 4.24 | % | 3.93 | % | 280,000 | 305,175 | ||||||||||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
298 | 436 | 3.30 | % | 4.83 | % | 36,083 | 36,083 | ||||||||||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
1,021 | 112 | 3.70 | % | | 110,356 | 23,667 | |||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
46 | 97 | 0.44 | % | 0.98 | % | 41,612 | 39,655 | ||||||||||||||||
29,616 | 39,443 | 2.95 | % | 3.79 | % | 4,018,051 | 4,159,397 | |||||||||||||||||
40,859 | 53,266 | 2.88 | % | 3.64 | % | 5,676,975 | 5,848,697 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income / spread |
$ | 29,438 | $ | 30,665 | 1.62 | % | 1.79 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate margin |
1.88 | % | 1.98 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Excess of interest-earning assets
over interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | 569,474 | $ | 335,284 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets over
interest-bearing liabilities ratio |
110.03 | % | 105.73 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
C. CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME DUE TO:
March 31, 2010 versus March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||
Interest Income: |
||||||||||||
Investments |
$ | 1,661 | $ | (14,573 | ) | $ | (12,912 | ) | ||||
Loans |
(968 | ) | 246 | (722 | ) | |||||||
693 | (14,327 | ) | (13,634 | ) | ||||||||
Interest Expense: |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
(249 | ) | (2,331 | ) | (2,580 | ) | ||||||
Repurchase agreements |
(1,953 | ) | (8,561 | ) | (10,514 | ) | ||||||
Other borrowings |
572 | 115 | 687 | |||||||||
(1,630 | ) | (10,777 | ) | (12,407 | ) | |||||||
$ | 2,323 | $ | (3,550 | ) | $ | (1,227 | ) | |||||
43
Table of Contents
Net interest income is a function of the difference between rates earned on the Groups
interest-earning assets and rates paid on its interest-bearing liabilities (interest rate spread)
and the relative amounts of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (interest
rate margin). The Group constantly monitors the composition and re-pricing of its assets and
liabilities to maintain its net interest income at adequate levels.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 net interest income amounted to $29.4 million, a decrease of
4.0% from $30.7 million in the same period of 2009. The decrease reflects a
16.2% reduction in interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, primarily the result of a
decrease of $14.3 million in rate variance, partially offset by an increase of $1.0 million in
volume variance. This decrease was partially offset by a 23.3% decrease in interest expense, due to
a negative rate variance of interest-bearing liabilities of $10.8 million and a negative volume
variance of interest-bearing liabilities of $1.6 million. Interest rate spread decreased 17 basis
points to 1.62% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 from 1.79% for the same period of 2009. This
decrease reflects a 93 basis point decrease in the average yield of interest earning assets to
4.50% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 from 5.43% for the same period of 2009, partially offset
by a 76 basis point decrease in the average cost of funds to 2.88% for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 from 3.64% for the same period of 2009.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the average balances of total interest-earnings assets were
$6.246 billion, a 1.0% increase from the same period last year. The increase in the quarterly
average balance of the 2010 first quarter reflects increases of 2.5% to $5.106 billion in the
investment portfolio, partially offset by a decrease of 5.3% to $1.140 billion in the loans
portfolio from the same period in previous year.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the average yield on interest-earning assets was 4.50%,
compared to 5.43% in the same period last year, due to lower average yields in the investment
portfolio. The investment portfolio yield decreased to 4.13% in the quarter ended March 31, 2010,
versus 5.27% in the same period last year. The loan portfolio yield increased to 6.17% in the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, versus 6.09% in the same period last year.
Interest income decreased 16.2% to $70.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as compared
to $83.9 million for the same period of 2009, reflecting the decrease in yield. Interest income is
generated by investment securities, which accounted for 74.9% of total interest income, and from
loans, which accounted for 25.1% of total interest income. Interest income from investments
decreased 19.7% to $52.7 million, due to a decrease in yield of 114 basis points from 5.27% to
4.13%. Interest income from loans decreased 3.9% to $17.6 million, mainly due to a 5.2% decrease in
loans average balance, which decreased to $1.140 billion from $1.204 billion. In December 2009 and
January 2010 the Group sold certain non-agency securities. Rather than reinvesting all of the
proceeds in the purchase of new, long-term securities, the Group has been building up its cash
position. At March 31, 2010, the Group had $468.1 million in cash versus $277.1 million at December
31, 2009. As a result of these two factors, yields on interest earning assets declined to 4.50% for
the first quarter from 5.43% in the same period in the previous year. At the same time, the
increased level of deposits enabled the Group to reduce cost of funds to 2.88% from 3.64% in the
same period in previous year. The net effect on the net interest income was a reduction of only
4.0% compared to the year ago quarter.
Interest expense decreased 23.3%, to $40.9 million for quarter ended March 31, 2010, from $53.3
million for the same period of 2009. The decrease is due to a significant reduction in cost of
funds, which has decreased 76 basis points from 3.64% to 2.88%. Reduction in the cost of funds is
mostly due to structured repurchase agreements amounting to $1.25 billion, which reset at the put
date at a formula which is based on the three-month LIBOR rate less fifteen times the difference
between the ten-year SWAP rate and the two-year SWAP rate, with a minimum of 0.00% on $1.0 billion
and 0.25% on $250 million, and a maximum of 10.6%. These repurchase agreements bear the respective
minimum rates of 0.0% (from March 6, 2009) and 0.25% (from March 2, 2009) to at least their next
put dates scheduled for March 2010. For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 the cost of deposits
decreased 56 basis points to 2.71%, as compared to the same period of 2009. The decrease reflects
lower average rates paid on higher balances, most significantly in savings and certificates of
deposit accounts. For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 the cost of borrowings decreased 84 basis
points to 2.95% from the same period of 2009.
44
Table of Contents
TABLE 2 NON-INTEREST INCOME SUMMARY
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Variance % | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Financial service revenues |
$ | 3,978 | $ | 3,114 | 27.7 | % | ||||||
Banking service revenues |
1,647 | 1,393 | 18.2 | % | ||||||||
Investment banking revenues (losses) |
| (12 | ) | -100.0 | % | |||||||
Mortgage banking activities |
1,797 | 2,153 | -16.5 | % | ||||||||
Total banking and financial service revenues |
7,422 | 6,648 | 11.6 | % | ||||||||
Excess of amortized costs over fair value on
other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
(39,590 | ) | | -100.0 | % | |||||||
Non-credit related unrealized loss on
securities recognized in other comprehensive
income |
38,958 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairments on securities |
(632 | ) | | -100.0 | % | |||||||
Net gain (loss) on: |
||||||||||||
Sale of securities |
12,020 | 10,340 | 16.3 | % | ||||||||
Derivatives |
(10,636 | ) | 434 | -100.0 | % | |||||||
Trading securities |
(3 | ) | (27 | ) | 88.9 | % | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
(117 | ) | (162 | ) | 27.8 | % | ||||||
Other investments |
9 | 13 | -30.8 | % | ||||||||
Other |
14 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
655 | 10,598 | -93.8 | % | |||||||||
Total non-interest income |
$ | 8,077 | $ | 17,246 | -53.2 | % | ||||||
Non-interest income is affected by the amount of securities, derivatives and trading
transactions, the level of trust assets under management, transactions generated by the gathering
of financial assets by the securities broker-dealer subsidiary, the level of investment and
mortgage banking activities, and the fees generated from loans, deposit accounts, and insurance
activities.
Non-interest income totaled $8.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of 53.2%
when compared to $17.2 million during the same period last year. Increase in total banking and
financial service revenues and revenues from sale of securities were offset by the losses of $10.6
million in derivatives reported during the March 31, 2010 quarter.
Financial services revenues, which consist of commissions and fees from fiduciary activities, and
commissions and fees from securities brokerage and insurance activities, increased 27.7%, to $4.0
million in the quarter ended March 31, 2010, from $3.1 million in the same period of 2009. Banking
service revenues, which consist primarily of fees generated by deposit accounts, electronic banking
services, and customer services, increased 18.2% to $1.6 million in the quarter ended March 31,
2010, from $1.4 million in the same period of 2009. Income generated from mortgage banking
activities decreased 16.5% to $1.8 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2010, from $2.2 million
in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, mainly the result of a decrease in the securitization and sale
of mortgage loans held-for-sale into the secondary market.
45
Table of Contents
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 gains from securities, derivatives, trading activities and
other investment activities was $1.4 million, compared to $10.8 million in the same period of 2009.
Decrease was mostly due to losses of $10.6 million in derivatives during the quarter ended March
31, 2010, compared with gains of $434 thousand for the same period in 2009. This loss on
derivatives was the result of the decline in long rates, reflecting a non-cash loss on valuation of
$10.6 million on the forward settled interest rate swaps. This essentially reversed the valuation
gain from the preceding quarter of about $9 million. Keeping with the Groups investment strategy,
during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, there were certain sales of available-for-sale
securities because the Group felt at the time of such sales that gains could be realized while at
the same time having good opportunities to invest the proceeds in other investment securities with
attractive yields and terms that would allow the Group to continue to protect its net interest
margin. Sale of securities available-for-sale, which generated gains of $12.0 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, increased 16.3% when compared to $10.3 million for the same period a
year ago. Benefitting from the strategic positioning of its investment securities portfolio, in
January 2010, the Group made the strategic decision to sell $374.3 million of non-agency CMOs which
contemplated a loss of $45.8 million. This loss was accounted for as other than temporary
impairment in the fourth quarter of 2009 and no additional gain or loss was realized on the sale in
January 2010, since these assets were sold at the same value reflected at December 31, 2009. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2010, a loss of $3 thousand was recognized in trading securities,
compared to a loss of $27 thousand in the previous year. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010
the Group recorded an other-than-temporary impairment loss of $632 thousand. No
other-than-temporary impairment loss was recognized in the previous year quarter.
The Group adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 320-10-65-1 as of April 1, 2009. For those debt
securities for which the fair value of the security is less than its amortized cost, the Group does
not intend to sell such security and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to
sell such security prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit
losses. These provisions require that the credit-related portion of other-than-temporary impairment
losses be recognized in earnings while the noncredit-related portion is recognized in other
comprehensive income, net of related taxes. For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 a $632 thousand
net credit-related impairment loss was recognized in earnings and a $39.0 million noncredit-related
impairment loss was recognized in other comprehensive income for a non-agency collateralized
mortgage obligation pool not expected to be sold. These other-than-temporary impairment losses are
not anticipated to have an income tax effect because the impaired securities are held in the
Groups IBE, and potential recoveries of these losses, if any, are expected to occur in a period in
which the income earned by the Groups IBE, would be 100% exempt from income taxes.
46
Table of Contents
TABLE 3 NON-INTEREST EXPENSES SUMMARY
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Variance % | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Compensation and employees benefits |
$ | 8,250 | $ | 7,724 | 6.8 | % | ||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
3,594 | 3,489 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||
Professional and service fees |
2,153 | 2,608 | -17.4 | % | ||||||||
Insurance |
1,833 | 815 | 124.9 | % | ||||||||
Taxes, other than payroll and income taxes |
857 | 646 | 32.7 | % | ||||||||
Advertising and business promotion |
699 | 1,204 | -41.9 | % | ||||||||
Electronic banking charges |
678 | 540 | 25.6 | % | ||||||||
Loan servicing expenses |
427 | 383 | 11.5 | % | ||||||||
Communication |
342 | 379 | -9.8 | % | ||||||||
Director and investors relations |
315 | 349 | -9.7 | % | ||||||||
Clearing and wrap fees |
297 | 330 | -10.0 | % | ||||||||
Other operating expenses |
948 | 806 | 17.6 | % | ||||||||
Total non-interest expenses |
$ | 20,393 | $ | 19,273 | 5.8 | % | ||||||
Relevant ratios and data: |
||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio |
55.33 | % | 51.65 | % | ||||||||
Expense ratio |
0.83 | % | 0.82 | % | ||||||||
Compensation and benefits to non-interest expenses |
40.5 | % | 40.1 | % | ||||||||
Compensation to total assets (annualized) |
0.51 | % | 0.48 | % | ||||||||
Average compensation per employee (annualized) |
$ | 65.0 | $ | 55.9 | ||||||||
Average number of employees |
528 | 553 | ||||||||||
Assets owned per average employee |
$ | 12,812 | $ | 11,729 | ||||||||
Non-interest expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 increased 5.8% to $20.4 million,
compared to $19.3 million for the same period of 2009, primarily as a result of higher insurance
expense and compensation and employees benefits. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010,
insurance expense increased 124.9% to $1.8 million from $815 thousand, as the result of
industry-wide increase in FDIC insurance assessment. Compensation and employees benefits increased
6.8% to $8.3 million from $7.7 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2009. In the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, occupancy and equipment, taxes, other than payroll and income taxes, electronic
banking charges, loan servicing expenses, and other operating expenses, increased 3.0%, 32.7%,
25.6%, 11.5%, and 17.6%, respectively, compared to the quarter ended
March 31, 2009. Increase in taxes, other than
payroll and income taxes is mostly due to increase in municipal
license tax, based on business volume, which increased compared to
previous year period. Increase in electronic banking charges is
mostly due to increase in POS transactions, as a result of the
Groups commercial POS cash management business. The
non-interest expense results reflect an efficiency ratio of 55.33% for the quarter ended March 31,
2010, compared to 51.65% in 2009. The efficiency ratio measures how much of a companys revenue is
used to pay operating expenses. The Group computes its efficiency ratio by dividing non-interest
expenses by the sum of its net interest income and non-interest income, but excluding gains on sale
of investments securities, derivatives gains or losses, credit-related other-than-temporary
impairment losses, and other income that may be considered volatile in nature. Management believes
that the exclusion of those items permit greater comparability. Amounts presented as part of
non-interest income that are excluded from the efficiency ratio computation amounted to $655
thousand and $10.6 million for quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
47
Table of Contents
TABLE 4 ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES SUMMARY
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
Quarter Ended March 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 23,272 | $ | 14,293 | 62.8 | % | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
4,014 | 3,200 | 25.4 | % | ||||||||
Net credit losses see Table 5 |
(1,309 | ) | (2,346 | ) | -44.2 | % | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 25,977 | $ | 15,147 | 71.5 | % | ||||||
TABLE 5 NET CREDIT LOSSES STATISTICS:
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
Quarter Ended March 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage |
||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
$ | (1,096 | ) | $ | (1,412 | ) | -22.4 | % | ||||
Recoveries |
| 16 | -100.0 | % | ||||||||
(1,096 | ) | (1,396 | ) | -21.5 | % | |||||||
Commercial |
||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(110 | ) | (616 | ) | -82.1 | % | ||||||
Recoveries |
11 | 18 | -38.9 | % | ||||||||
(99 | ) | (598 | ) | -83.4 | % | |||||||
Consumer |
||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(186 | ) | (397 | ) | -53.1 | % | ||||||
Recoveries |
72 | 45 | 60.0 | % | ||||||||
(114 | ) | (352 | ) | -67.6 | % | |||||||
Net credit losses |
||||||||||||
Total charge-offs |
(1,392 | ) | (2,425 | ) | -42.6 | % | ||||||
Total recoveries |
83 | 79 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||
$ | (1,309 | ) | $ | (2,346 | ) | -44.2 | % | |||||
Net credit losses (recoveries) to
average loans outstanding (1): |
||||||||||||
Mortgage |
0.47 | % | 0.56 | % | ||||||||
Commercial |
0.21 | % | 1.30 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
2.15 | % | 6.68 | % | ||||||||
Total |
0.46 | % | 0.78 | % | ||||||||
Average loans: |
||||||||||||
Mortgage |
$ | 927,573 | $ | 998,506 | -7.1 | % | ||||||
Commercial |
191,338 | 184,157 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
21,200 | 21,073 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,140,111 | $ | 1,203,736 | -5.3 | % | ||||||
(1) | Annualized ratios |
TABLE 6 ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES BREAKDOWN
March 31, | December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | ||||||||||
Mortgage |
$ | 17,789 | $ | 15,044 | 18.2 | % | ||||||
Commercial |
6,312 | 7,112 | -11.2 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
678 | 864 | -21.5 | % | ||||||||
Unallocated allowance |
1,198 | 252 | 375.4 | % | ||||||||
$ | 25,977 | $ | 23,272 | 11.6 | % | |||||||
Allowance composition: |
||||||||||||
Mortgage |
68.5 | % | 64.6 | % | ||||||||
Commercial |
24.3 | % | 30.6 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
2.6 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||||||
Unallocated allowance |
4.6 | % | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Allowance coverage ratio at
end of period |
||||||||||||
Applicable to: |
||||||||||||
Mortgage |
1.91 | % | 1.60 | % | ||||||||
Commercial |
3.10 | % | 3.60 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
3.08 | % | 3.76 | % | ||||||||
Unallocated allowance to total
loans |
0.10 | % | 0.02 | % | ||||||||
Total allowance to total loans |
2.25 | % | 2.00 | % | ||||||||
Other selected data and ratios: |
||||||||||||
Allowance coverage ratio to: |
||||||||||||
Non-performing loans |
23.8 | % | 22.3 | % | ||||||||
Non-mortgage non-performing
loans |
161.1 | % | 144.3 | % | ||||||||
48
Table of Contents
The provision for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 totaled $4.0 million, a
25.4% increase from the $3.2 million reported for 2009, mainly
due to a deteriorating macroeconomic environment. Based on an analysis of the credit quality
and the composition of the Groups loan portfolio, management determined that the provision for
2010 was adequate in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an adequate level.
Net credit losses decreased 44.2% to $1.3 million from $2.3 million in the same period of 2009. The
decrease was primarily due to lower net credit losses from mortgage loans, commercial loans, and
consumer loans. Non-performing loans of $109.3 million at March 31, 2010, were 26.3% higher than
the $86.5 million at March 31, 2009, and 4.7% higher than the $104.4 million at December 31, 2009.
The Group maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level that management considers adequate to
provide for probable losses based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks. The Groups
allowance for loan losses policy provides for a detailed quarterly analysis of probable losses.
The Group follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance
for loan losses to provide for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This methodology includes the
consideration of factors such as economic conditions, portfolio risk characteristics, prior loss
experience, and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans. The provision for loan
losses charged to current operations is based on such methodology. Loan losses are charged and
recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses. Principal factors that contributed to the
increase in provision for December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 were the continuing deterioration in
the net charge-off trend in the mortgage loan portfolio; the continuing increased trend in
non-performing loans and the continuing recessionary economical conditions in Puerto Rico.
Larger commercial loans that exhibit potential or observed credit weaknesses are subject to
individual review and grading. Where appropriate, allowances are allocated to individual loans
based on managements estimate of the borrowers ability to repay the loan given the availability
of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal options available to the Group.
Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired. A loan is considered
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Group will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or as a practical
expedient, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral, if the
loan is collateral dependent. Loans are individually evaluated for impairment, except large groups
of small balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, and loans that
are recorded at fair value or at the lower of cost or market. The portfolios of mortgage and
consumer loans are considered homogeneous, and are evaluated collectively for impairment. For the
commercial loans portfolio, all loans over $250 thousand and over 90-days past due are evaluated
for impairment. At March 31, 2010, the total investment in impaired commercial loans was $16.6
million, compared to $15.6 million at December 31, 2009. Impaired commercial loans are measured
based on the fair value of collateral method, since all impaired loans during the period were
collateral dependant. The valuation allowance for impaired commercial loans amounted to
approximately $624 thousand and $709 thousand at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. At March 31, 2010, the total investment in impaired mortgage loans was $10.5 million,
compared to $10.7 million at December 31, 2009. Impairment on mortgage loans assessed as troubled
debt restructuring was measured using the present value of cash flows. The valuation allowance for
impaired mortgage loans amounted to approximately $706 thousand and $683 thousand at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The Group, using a rating system, applies an overall allowance percentage to each loan portfolio
category based on historical credit losses adjusted for current conditions and trends. This
calculation is the starting point for managements systematic determination of the required level
of the allowance for loan losses. Other data considered in this determination includes: the credit
grading assigned to commercial loans, delinquency levels, loss trends and other information
including underwriting standards and economic trends.
Loan loss ratios and credit risk categories are updated quarterly and are applied in the context of
GAAP and the Joint Interagency Guidance on the importance of depository institutions having
prudent, conservative, but not excessive loan loss allowances that fall within an acceptable range
of estimated losses. While management uses available information in estimating probable loan
losses, future changes to the allowance may be necessary, based on factors beyond the Groups
control, such as factors affecting general economic conditions.
In the current quarter, the Group has not substantively changed in any material respect of its
overall approach in the determination of the allowance for loan losses. There have been no material
changes in criteria or estimation techniques as compared to prior periods that impacted the
determination of the current period allowance for loan losses.
49
Table of Contents
TABLE 7 HIGHER RISK RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
Higher-Risk Residential Mortgage Loans* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High Loan-to-Value Ratio Mortgages | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Junior Lien Mortages | Interest Only Loans | LTV 90% to 100% | LTV Over 100% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying Value | Allowance | Carrying Value | Allowance | Carrying Value | Allowance | Carrying Value | Allowance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delinquency: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current 90 days |
$ | 23,610 | $ | 289 | $ | 37,305 | $ | 979 | $ | 128,017 | $ | 1,808 | $ | 3,007 | $ | 40 | ||||||||||||||||
91- 120 days |
232 | 8 | 478 | 28 | 1,539 | 34 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
121 - 180 days |
402 | 13 | 1,039 | 90 | 2,064 | 67 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
181- 365 days |
791 | 30 | 2,962 | 232 | 5,772 | 274 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Over 365 days |
2,243 | 197 | 3,536 | 818 | 9,587 | 1,301 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 27,278 | $ | 537 | $ | 45,320 | $ | 2,146 | $ | 146,978 | $ | 3,484 | $ | 3,007 | $ | 40 | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total loans |
2.36 | % | 3.92 | % | 12.70 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinanced or Modified Loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount |
$ | 701 | $ | 13 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,944 | $ | 36 | $ | 1,434 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||
Percentage of Higher-Risk Loan Category |
2.57 | % | 0.00 | % | 2.00 | % | 47.69 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Loan-to-Value Ratio: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under 70% |
$ | 20,660 | $ | 384 | $ | 3,501 | $ | 120 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
70%- 79% |
3,687 | 104 | 7,394 | 473 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
80% - 89% |
2,206 | 31 | 13,125 | 644 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
90% - 100% |
725 | 17 | 21,300 | 909 | 146,978 | 3,484 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Over 100% |
| | | | | | 3,007 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 27,278 | $ | 537 | $ | 45,320 | $ | 2,146 | $ | 146,978 | $ | 3,484 | $ | 3,007 | $ | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
* | Loans may be included in more than one higher-risk loan category |
TABLE 8 NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
March 31, | December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | ||||||||||
Non-performing assets: |
||||||||||||
Non-accruing loans |
||||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR) loans |
$ | 327 | $ | 214 | 52.8 | % | ||||||
Other loans |
60,223 | 56,854 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||
Accruing loans |
||||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR) loans |
553 | 443 | 24.8 | % | ||||||||
Other loans |
48,187 | 46,860 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||
Total non-performing loans |
109,290 | 104,371 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
9,918 | 9,347 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||
$ | 119,208 | $ | 113,718 | 4.8 | % | |||||||
Non-performing assets to total assets |
1.83 | % | 1.74 | % | ||||||||
50
Table of Contents
TABLE 9 NON-PERFORMING LOANS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
March 31, | December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | ||||||||||
Non-performing loans: |
||||||||||||
Mortgage |
$ | 92,532 | $ | 88,238 | 4.9 | % | ||||||
Commercial, mainly real estate |
16,156 | 15,688 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
602 | 445 | 35.3 | % | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 109,290 | $ | 104,371 | 4.7 | % | ||||||
Non-performing loans composition percentages: |
||||||||||||
Mortgage |
84.7 | % | 84.5 | % | ||||||||
Commercial, mainly real estate |
14.8 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
0.6 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Non-performing loans to: |
||||||||||||
Total loans |
9.44 | % | 8.97 | % | 5.2 | % | ||||||
Total assets |
1.68 | % | 1.59 | % | 5.7 | % | ||||||
Total capital |
23.42 | % | 31.61 | % | -25.9 | % | ||||||
Detailed information concerning each of the items that comprise non-performing assets follows:
| Mortgage loans are placed on a non-accrual basis when they become 365 days or more past due and are written-down, if necessary, based on the specific evaluation of the collateral underlying the loan. At March 31, 2010, the Groups non-performing mortgage loans totaled $92.5 million (84.7% of the Groups non-performing loans), a 4.9% increase from the $88.2 million (84.5% of the Groups non-performing loans) reported at December 31, 2009. Non-performing loans in this category are primarily residential mortgage loans. |
| Commercial loans are placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days or more past due and are written-down, if necessary, based on the specific evaluation of the underlying collateral, if any. At March 31, 2010, the Groups non-performing commercial loans amounted to $16.2 million (14.8% of the Groups non-performing loans), a 3.0% increase when compared to non-performing commercial loans of $15.7 million reported at December 31, 2009 (15.0% of the Groups non-performing loans). Most of this portfolio is collateralized by commercial real estate properties. |
| Consumer loans are placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days past due and written-off when payments are delinquent 120 days in personal loans and 180 days in credit cards and personal lines of credit. At March 31, 2010, the Groups non-performing consumer loans amounted to $602 thousand (0.6% of the Groups total non-performing loans), a 35.3% increase from the $$445 thousand reported at December 31, 2009 (0.4% of total non-performing loans). |
| Foreclosed real estate is initially recorded at the lower of the related loan balance or fair value less cost to sell, at the date of foreclosure. Any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the property is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Subsequently, any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value less disposition cost is charged to operations. Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate properties during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, totaled approximately $2.3 million. |
51
Table of Contents
TABLE 10 ASSETS SUMMARY AND COMPOSITION
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009, AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009, AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
March 31, | December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | ||||||||||
Investments: |
||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
$ | 3,277,247 | $ | 2,764,173 | 18.6 | % | ||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
595,501 | 1,007,091 | -40.9 | % | ||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
71,197 | 446,037 | -84.0 | % | ||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
248,713 | 286,509 | -13.2 | % | ||||||||
GNMA certificates |
317,559 | 346,103 | -8.2 | % | ||||||||
Structured credit investments |
40,090 | 38,383 | 4.4 | % | ||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
66,625 | 65,732 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||
FHLB stock |
19,937 | 19,937 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Other investments |
331 | 304 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||
4,637,199 | 4,974,269 | -6.8 | % | |||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||
Loans receivable |
1,129,471 | 1,136,080 | -0.6 | % | ||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(25,977 | ) | (23,272 | ) | 11.6 | % | ||||||
Loans receivable, net |
1,103,494 | 1,112,808 | -0.8 | % | ||||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
27,785 | 27,261 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||
Total loans |
1,131,279 | 1,140,069 | -0.8 | % | ||||||||
Securities sold but not yet delivered |
116,747 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Total securities and loans |
5,885,225 | 6,114,338 | -3.7 | % | ||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
450,323 | 247,691 | 81.8 | % | ||||||||
Money market investments |
17,758 | 29,432 | -39.7 | % | ||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
37,100 | 33,656 | 10.2 | % | ||||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
18,571 | 19,775 | -6.1 | % | ||||||||
Deferred tax asset, net |
32,186 | 31,685 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
9,918 | 9,347 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||
Investment in equity indexed options |
7,875 | 6,464 | 21.8 | % | ||||||||
Other assets |
49,564 | 58,445 | -15.2 | % | ||||||||
Total other assets |
623,295 | 436,495 | 42.8 | % | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,508,520 | $ | 6,550,833 | -0.6 | % | ||||||
Investments portfolio composition: |
||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
70.7 | % | 55.6 | % | ||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
12.8 | % | 20.2 | % | ||||||||
Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations |
1.5 | % | 9.0 | % | ||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
5.4 | % | 5.8 | % | ||||||||
GNMA certificates |
6.8 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||||||
Structured credit investments |
0.9 | % | 0.8 | % | ||||||||
Puerto Rico Government and agency obligations |
1.4 | % | 1.3 | % | ||||||||
FHLB stock |
0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
At March 31, 2010, the Groups total assets amounted to $6.509 billion, a decrease of 0.6% when
compared to $6.551 billion at December 31, 2009, and interest-earning assets reached $5.885
billion, down 3.7%, versus $6.114 billion at December 31, 2009.
Investments principally consist of money market instruments, U.S. government and agency bonds,
mortgage-backed securities and Puerto Rico government and agency bonds. At March 31, 2010, the
investment portfolio decreased 6.8% from $4.974 billion to $4.637 billion. This decrease is mostly
due to a decrease of $411.6 million or 40.9% in U.S. Government
sponsored agencies bonds and a decrease of $374.8 million or 84.0% in Non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations,
partially offset by an increase of $513.1 million or 18.6% in FMNA and FHLMC certificates, when
compared to December 31, 2009.
52
Table of Contents
At March 31, 2010, the Groups loan portfolio, the second largest category of the Groups
interest-earning assets, amounted to $1.131 billion, a decrease of 0.8% when compared to the $1.140
billion at December 31, 2009. The Groups loan portfolio is mainly comprised of residential loans,
home equity loans, and commercial loans collateralized by mortgages on real estate located in
Puerto Rico. The mortgage loan portfolio amounted to $930.6 million or 80.4% of the loan portfolio
as of March 31, 2010, compared to $1.023 billion or 83.0% of the loan portfolio at December 31,
2009. Mortgage production and purchases of $55.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
decreased 17.8%, from $67.9 million, when compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The Group
sells most of its conforming mortgages into the secondary market, retaining servicing rights.
The second largest component of the Groups loan portfolio is commercial loans. At March 31, 2010,
the commercial loan portfolio totaled $203.7 million (17.6% of the Groups total loan portfolio),
in comparison to $187.1 million at December 31, 2009 (15.2%
of the Groups total loan portfolio). The increase of $16.0
million in the portfolio as compared to December 31, 2009 is mainly
related to the origination of two new credit relationships amounting
to $8.0 million and $2.0 million. Commercial loan production increased 11.1% to $20.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
from $18.1 million in the same period of 2009.
The consumer loan portfolio totaled $23.0 million (2.0% of total loan portfolio at March 31, 2010),
in comparison to $23.1 million at December 31, 2009 (1.9% total loan portfolio at such date).
53
Table of Contents
TABLE 11 LIABILITIES SUMMARY AND COMPOSITION
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
March 31, | December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | ||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
$ | 90,925 | $ | 73,548 | 23.6 | % | ||||||
Now accounts |
638,833 | 619,947 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||
Savings accounts |
108,660 | 86,791 | 25.2 | % | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
973,683 | 961,344 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||
1,812,101 | 1,741,630 | 4.0 | % | |||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
4,232 | 3,871 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||
1,816,333 | 1,745,501 | 4.1 | % | |||||||||
Borrowings: |
||||||||||||
Federal funds purchases and other short term borrowings |
37,953 | 49,179 | -22.8 | % | ||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,557,149 | 3,557,308 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
281,687 | 281,753 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
105,112 | 105,834 | -0.7 | % | ||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
36,083 | 36,083 | | |||||||||
4,017,984 | 4,030,157 | -0.3 | % | |||||||||
Total deposits and borrowings |
5,834,317 | 5,775,658 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||
Securities and loans purchased but not yet received |
171,813 | 413,359 | -58.4 | % | ||||||||
Other liabilities |
38,216 | 31,650 | 20.7 | % | ||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 6,044,346 | $ | 6,220,667 | -2.8 | % | ||||||
Deposits portfolio composition percentages: |
||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
5.0 | % | 4.2 | % | ||||||||
Now accounts |
35.3 | % | 35.6 | % | ||||||||
Savings accounts |
6.0 | % | 5.0 | % | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
53.7 | % | 55.2 | % | ||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Borrowings portfolio composition percentages: |
||||||||||||
Federal funds purchases and other short term borrowings |
1.0 | % | 1.2 | % | ||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
88.5 | % | 88.3 | % | ||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
7.0 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
2.6 | % | 2.6 | % | ||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
0.9 | % | 0.9 | % | ||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
||||||||||||
Amount outstanding at year-end |
$ | 3,557,149 | $ | 3,557,308 | ||||||||
Daily average outstanding balance |
$ | 3,550,000 | $ | 3,659,442 | ||||||||
Maximum outstanding balance at any month-end |
$ | 3,566,588 | $ | 3,762,353 | ||||||||
At March 31, 2010, the Groups total liabilities reached $6.044 billion, 2.8% lower than the
$6.220 billion reported at December 31, 2009. This decrease is mostly due to securities purchased
but not yet received at December 31, 2009 amounting to $413.4 million compared to $171.8 million
reported in March 31, 2010. Deposits and borrowings, the Groups funding sources, amounted to
$5.834 billion at March 31, 2010 versus $5.776 billion at December 31, 2009, a 1.0% increase.
Borrowings represented 68.9% of interest-bearing liabilities and deposits represented 31.1%.
54
Table of Contents
Borrowings consist mainly of funding sources through the use of repurchase agreements, FHLB
advances, FDIC-guaranteed term notes, subordinated capital notes, and other borrowings. At March
31, 2010, borrowings amounted to $4.018 billion 0.3% lower than the $4.030 billion recorded at
December 31, 2009. Repurchase agreements as of March 31, 2010 amounted to $3.557 billion and remain
the same as of December 31, 2009.
The FHLB system functions as a source of credit for financial institutions that are members of a
regional Federal Home Loan Bank. As a member of the FHLB, the Group can obtain advances from the
FHLB, secured by the FHLB stock owned by the Group, as well as by certain of the Groups mortgage
loans and investment securities. FHLB funding amounted to $281.7 million at March 31, 2010, versus
$281.8 million at December 31, 2009. These advances mature from May 2012 through May 2014.
The Groups banking subsidiary issued in March 2009 $105.0 million in notes guaranteed under the
FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. These notes are due on March 16, 2012, bear interest at
a 2.75% fixed rate, and are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Interest on
the note is payable on the 16th of each March and September, beginning September 16,
2009. Shortly after issuance of the notes, the Group paid $3.2 million (equivalent to an annual fee
of 100 basis points) to the FDIC to maintain the FDIC guarantee coverage until the maturity of the
notes. This cost has been deferred and is being amortized over the term of the notes. The total
cost of the notes for 2009, including the amount of the debt issuance costs, was 3.58%.
At March 31, 2010, deposits, the second largest category of the Groups interest-bearing
liabilities reached $1.816 billion, up 4.1% from $1.746 billion at December 31, 2009. Retail
deposits, benefiting from expanded market share, grew 24.6% to $1.487 billion in March 31, 2010
from $1.193 billion in previous year quarter, enabling the Group to reduce higher cost deposits.
Higher cost brokered deposits decreased $307.4 million or 68.0%, while other wholesale
institutional deposits increased $23.6 million or 14.6%.
Stockholders Equity
On March 19, 2010, the Group completed an underwritten public offering of 8,740,000 shares of its
common stock. The offering resulted in net proceeds of $94.5 million after deducting offering
costs. The net proceeds of this offering were intended for general corporate purposes, which
included funding organic acquisition and acquisition growth opportunities, including the
participation in government assisted transactions in Puerto Rico. It also contributed a portion of
the net proceeds in the form of capital to Oriental Bank and Trust, which used such amount to
bolster its regulatory capital needs and general corporate purposes.
At March 31, 2010, the Groups total stockholders equity was $464.2 million, a 45.3% increase,
when compared to $330.2 million at December 31, 2009. This increase reflects the aforementioned
issuance of stock, the net income for the quarter, and an improvement of approximately $33.0
million in the fair value of the investment securities portfolio.
The Group maintains capital ratios in excess of regulatory requirements. At March 31, 2010, Tier 1
Leverage Capital Ratio was 7.82% (1.96 times the requirement of 4.00%), Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital
Ratio was 23.55% (5.89 times the requirement of 4.00%), and Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio was
24.73% (3.09 times the requirement of 8.00%).
55
Table of Contents
The following are the consolidated capital ratios of the Group at March 31, 2010 and 2009 and
December 31, 2009:
TABLE 12 CAPITAL, DIVIDENDS AND STOCK DATA
(In thousands, except for per share data)
(In thousands, except for per share data)
March 31, | December 31, | Variance | March 31, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Capital data: |
||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
$ | 464,174 | $ | 330,166 | 40.6 | % | $ | 319,351 | ||||||||
Regulatory Capital Ratios data: |
||||||||||||||||
Leverage Capital Ratio |
7.82 | % | 6.52 | % | 19.9 | % | 6.54 | % | ||||||||
Minimum Leverage Capital Ratio Required |
4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||
Actual Tier 1 Capital |
$ | 518,423 | $ | 414,702 | 25.0 | % | $ | 416,955 | ||||||||
Minimum Tier 1 Capital Required |
$ | 265,217 | $ | 254,323 | 4.3 | % | $ | 254,836 | ||||||||
Excess over regulatory requirement |
$ | 253,206 | $ | 160,379 | 57.9 | % | $ | 162,119 | ||||||||
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio |
23.55 | % | 18.79 | % | 25.3 | % | 16.20 | % | ||||||||
Minimum Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio Required |
4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||
Actual Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital |
$ | 518,423 | $ | 414,702 | 25.0 | % | $ | 416,955 | ||||||||
Minimum Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Required |
$ | 88,069 | $ | 88,295 | -0.3 | % | $ | 102,926 | ||||||||
Excess over regulatory requirement |
$ | 430,354 | $ | 326,407 | 31.8 | % | $ | 314,029 | ||||||||
Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 2,201,715 | $ | 2,207,383 | -0.3 | % | $ | 2,573,148 | ||||||||
Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio |
24.73 | % | 19.84 | % | 24.6 | % | 16.79 | % | ||||||||
Minimum Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio Required |
8.00 | % | 8.00 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||
Actual Total Risk-Based Capital |
$ | 544,400 | $ | 437,975 | 24.3 | % | $ | 432,102 | ||||||||
Minimum Total Risk-Based Capital Required |
$ | 176,137 | $ | 176,591 | -0.3 | % | $ | 205,852 | ||||||||
Excess over regulatory requirement |
$ | 368,263 | $ | 261,384 | 40.9 | % | $ | 226,250 | ||||||||
Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 2,201,715 | $ | 2,207,383 | -0.3 | % | $ | 2,573,148 | ||||||||
Tangible common equity (1) to total assets |
6.06 | % | 3.97 | % | 52.6 | % | 3.84 | % | ||||||||
Tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets |
17.90 | % | 11.79 | % | 51.8 | % | 9.69 | % | ||||||||
Total equity to total assets |
7.13 | % | 5.04 | % | 41.5 | % | 4.92 | % | ||||||||
Total equity to risk-weighted assets |
21.08 | % | 14.96 | % | 40.9 | % | 12.41 | % | ||||||||
Stock data: |
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding common shares, net of treasury |
33,103 | 24,235 | 36.6 | % | 24,223 | |||||||||||
Book value per common share |
$ | 11.97 | $ | 10.82 | 10.6 | % | $ | 10.38 | ||||||||
Market price at end of year |
$ | 13.50 | $ | 10.80 | 25.0 | % | $ | 4.88 | ||||||||
Market capitalization |
$ | 446,891 | $ | 261,738 | 70.7 | % | $ | 118,208 | ||||||||
Common dividend data: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
$ | 1,322 | $ | 972 | 36.0 | % | $ | 972 | ||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | 0.0 | % | $ | 0.04 | ||||||||
Payout ratio |
9.76 | % | -1.29 | % | 856.6 | % | 4.12 | % | ||||||||
Dividend yield |
0.30 | % | 0.37 | % | -20.0 | % | 0.82 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Tangible common equity consists of common equity less goodwill. |
The following provides the high and low prices and dividend per share of the Groups stock for
each quarter of the last three periods:
Cash | ||||||||||||
Price | Dividend | |||||||||||
High | Low | Per share | ||||||||||
2010 |
||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 |
$ | 14.09 | $ | 10.00 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
2009 |
||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
$ | 13.69 | $ | 9.43 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
September 30, 2009 |
$ | 15.41 | $ | 7.48 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
June 30, 2009 |
$ | 11.27 | $ | 4.88 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
March 31, 2009 |
$ | 7.38 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
2008 |
||||||||||||
December 31, 2008 |
$ | 18.56 | $ | 5.37 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
September 30, 2008 |
$ | 20.99 | $ | 14.21 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
June 30, 2008 |
$ | 20.57 | $ | 14.26 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
March 31, 2008 |
$ | 23.28 | $ | 12.79 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||
56
Table of Contents
The Bank is considered well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective. The
table below shows the Banks regulatory capital ratios at March 31, 2010 and 2009 and December 31,
2009:
March 31, | December 31, | Variance | March 31, | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | % | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Oriental Bank and Trust |
||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Capital Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||
Total Tier 1 Capital to Total Assets |
7.15 | % | 5.78 | % | 23.7 | % | 5.66 | % | ||||||||
Actual Tier 1 Capital |
$ | 463,998 | $ | 359,339 | 29.1 | % | $ | 339,236 | ||||||||
Minimum Capital Requirement (4%) |
$ | 259,724 | $ | 248,671 | 4.4 | % | $ | 239,782 | ||||||||
Minimum to be well capitalized (5%) |
$ | 324,655 | $ | 310,839 | 4.4 | % | $ | 299,728 | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
21.50 | % | 16.52 | % | 30.1 | % | 14.16 | % | ||||||||
Actual Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital |
$ | 463,998 | $ | 359,339 | 29.1 | % | $ | 339,236 | ||||||||
Minimum Capital Requirement (4%) |
$ | 86,322 | $ | 87,021 | -0.8 | % | $ | 95,825 | ||||||||
Minimum to be well capitalized (6%) |
$ | 129,483 | $ | 130,532 | -0.8 | % | $ | 149,737 | ||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
22.70 | % | 17.59 | % | 29.1 | % | 14.79 | % | ||||||||
Actual Total Risk-Based Capital |
$ | 489,974 | $ | 382,611 | 28.1 | % | $ | 354,383 | ||||||||
Minimum Capital Requirement (8%) |
$ | 172,644 | $ | 174,042 | -0.8 | % | $ | 191,649 | ||||||||
Minimum to be well capitalized (10%) |
$ | 215,805 | $ | 217,553 | -0.8 | % | $ | 239,561 | ||||||||
The Groups common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol OFG.
At March 31, 2010, the Groups market capitalization for its outstanding common stock was $446.9
million ($13.50 per share).
The Oriental Financial Group Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan
(the Omnibus Plan), provides for equity-based compensation incentives through the grant of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and dividend
equivalents, as well as equity-based performance awards. The Omnibus Plan was adopted in 2007 and
amended and restated in 2008.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
RISK MANAGEMENT
Background
The Groups risk management policies are established by its Board of Directors (the Board),
implemented by management, through the adoption of a risk management program, which is overseen and
monitored by the Chief Risk Officer and the Risk Management Committee (RMC). During 2009, the Group
continued to refine and enhance its risk management program by strengthening policies, processes
and procedures necessary to maintain effective risk management.
All aspects of the Groups business activities are susceptible to risk. Consequently, risk
identification and monitoring are essential to risk management. As more fully discussed below, the
Groups primary risks exposure include, market, interest rate, credit, liquidity, operational and
concentration risks.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from adverse movements in market rates or
prices, such as interest rates or prices. The Group evaluates market risk together with interest
rate risk (See Interest Rate Risk below).
The Groups financial results and capital levels are constantly exposed to market risk. The Board
and management are primarily responsible for ensuring that the market risk assumed by the Group
complies with the guidelines established by Board approved policies. The Board has delegated the
management of this risk to the Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) which is composed
of certain executive officers from the business, treasury and finance areas. One of ALCOs primary
goals is to ensure that the market risk assumed by the Group is within the parameters established
in the policies adopted by the Board.
57
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the exposure of the Groups earnings or capital to adverse movements in
interest rates. It is a predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on earnings.
The Group manages its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of changes in interest
rates on net interest income. ALCO is responsible for monitoring compliance with the market risk
policies approved by the Board and adopting interest risk management strategies. In that role, ALCO
oversees interest rate risk, liquidity management and other related matters.
In discharging its responsibilities, ALCO examines current and expected conditions in world
financial markets, competition and prevailing rates in the local deposit market, liquidity,
unrealized gains and losses in securities, recent or proposed changes to the investment portfolio,
alternative funding sources and their costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives such
as swaps and caps, and any tax or regulatory issues which may be pertinent to these areas.
Each quarter, the Group performs a net interest income simulation analysis on a consolidated basis
to estimate the potential change in future earnings from projected changes in interest rates. These
simulations are carried out over a one-year time horizon, assuming gradual upward and downward
interest rate movements of 200 basis points, achieved during a twelve-month period. Simulations are
carried out in two ways:
(1) | using a static balance sheet as the Group had on the simulation date, and |
(2) | using a growing balance sheet based on recent growth patterns and business strategies. |
The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and liabilities detailed by maturity or
re-pricing and their corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates rise or fall, these
simulations incorporate expected future lending rates, current and expected future funding sources
and cost, the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment rates, deposits decay and other
factors which may be important in projecting the future growth of net interest income.
The Group uses a software to project future movements in the Groups balance sheet and income
statement. The starting point of the projections generally corresponds to the actual values of the
balance sheet on the date of the simulations.
These simulations are highly complex, and use many simplifying assumptions that are intended to
reflect the general behavior of the Group over the period in question. There can be no assurance
that actual events will match these assumptions in all cases. For this reason, the results of these
simulations are only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest income to changes in
market interest rates. The following table presents the results of the simulations at March 31,
2010, assuming a one-year time horizon:
Net Interest Income Risk (one year projection) | ||||||||||||||||
Static Balance Sheet | Growing simulation | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
Change in interest rate | Change | Change | Change | Change | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
+ 200 Basis points |
$ | 18,800 | 16.68 | % | $ | 18,263 | 16.11 | % | ||||||||
+ 100 Basis points |
$ | 14,671 | 13.02 | % | $ | 14,682 | 12.95 | % | ||||||||
- 100 Basis points |
$ | (24,398 | ) | -21.65 | % | $ | (23,501 | ) | -20.73 | % | ||||||
- 200 Basis points |
$ | (40,916 | ) | -36.31 | % | $ | (38,447 | ) | -33.91 | % | ||||||
Future net interest income could be affected by the Groups investments in callable securities,
prepayment risk related to mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, and its structured
repurchase agreements and advances from the FHLB. As part of the strategy to limit the interest
rate risk and reduce the re-pricing gaps of the Groups assets and liabilities, the maturity and
the re-pricing frequency of the liabilities has been extended to longer terms. The concentration of
long-term fixed rate securities has also been reduced.
58
Table of Contents
The Group uses derivative instruments and other strategies to manage its exposure to interest rate
risk caused by changes in interest rates beyond managements control. The following summarizes
strategies, including derivative activities, used by the Group in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate swaps Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying principal. The interest rate swaps have been utilized to convert short term repurchase agreements into fixed rate to better match the re-pricing nature of these borrowings. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 there were open forward settled swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $900 million. The forward settle date of these swaps is December 28, 2011 with final maturities raging from December 28, 2013 through December 28, 2014. A derivative liability of $1.8 million and $8.5 million was recognized in the unaudited consolidated statement of financial condition related to the valuation of these swaps at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. |
Structured borrowings The Group uses structured repurchase agreements and advances from FHLB, with embedded put options, to reduce the Groups exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the contractual maturities of its liabilities. |
The Group offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of
the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index. At the end of five years, the depositor receives a
minimum return or a specified percentage of the average increase of the month-end value of the
stock index. The Group uses option agreements with major money center banks and major broker-dealer
companies to manage its exposure to changes in those indexes. Under the terms of the option
agreements, the Group receives the average increase in the month-end value of the corresponding
index in exchange for a fixed premium. The changes in fair value of the options purchased and the
options embedded in the certificates of deposit are recorded in earnings.
Derivatives instruments are generally negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) contracts. Negotiated OTC
derivatives are generally entered into between two counterparties that negotiate specific agreement
terms, including the underlying instrument, amount, exercise price and maturity.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value the purchased options used to manage the
exposure to the stock market on stock indexed deposits represented an asset of $7.9 million, and
$6.5 million, respectively; and the options sold to customers embedded in the certificates of
deposit represented a liability of $10.9 million and $9.5 million, respectively, recorded in
deposits.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the possibility of loss arising from a borrower or counterparty in a credit-related
contract failing to perform in accordance with its terms. The principal source of credit risk for
the Group is its lending activities.
The Group manages its credit risk through a comprehensive credit policy which establishes sound
underwriting standards, by monitoring and evaluating loan portfolio quality, and by the constant
assessment of reserves and loan concentrations. The Group also employs proactive collection and
loss mitigation practices.
The Group may also encounter risk of default in relation to its securities portfolio. The
securities held by the Group are principally mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury and
agency securities. Thus, a substantial portion of these instruments are guaranteed by mortgages, a
U.S. government-sponsored entity or the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, and are
deemed to be of the highest credit quality. The available-for-sale securities portfolio also
includes approximately $71.2 million in non-government agency pass-through collateralized mortgage
obligations and $40.1 million in structured credit investments that are considered of a higher
credit risk than agency securities.
Managements Credit Committee, composed of the Groups Chief Executive Officer, Chief Credit Risk
Officer and other senior executives, has primary responsibility for setting strategies to achieve
the Groups credit risk goals and objectives. Those goals and objectives are set forth in the
Groups Credit Policy.
59
Table of Contents
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk of the Group not being able to generate sufficient cash from either
assets or liabilities to meet obligations as they become due, without incurring substantial losses.
The Groups cash requirements principally consist of deposit withdrawals, contractual loan funding,
repayment of borrowings as they mature, and funding of new and existing investment as required.
The Groups business requires continuous access to various funding sources. While the Group is able
to fund its operations through deposits as well as through advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
of New York and other alternative sources, the Groups business is significantly dependent upon
other wholesale funding sources, such as repurchase agreements and brokered deposits. While most of
the Groups repurchase agreements have been structured with initial terms to maturity of between
three and ten years, the counterparties have the right to exercise put options before the
contractual maturities.
Brokered deposits are typically sold through an intermediary to small retail investors. The Groups
ability to continue to attract brokered deposits is subject to variability based upon a number of
factors, including volume and volatility in the global securities markets, the Groups credit
rating and the relative interest rates that it is prepared to pay for these liabilities. Brokered
deposits are generally considered a less stable source of funding than core deposits obtained
through retail bank branches. Investors in brokered deposits are generally more sensitive to
interest rates and will generally move funds from one depository institution to another based on
small differences in interest rates offered on deposits.
Although the Group expects to have continued access to credit from the foregoing sources of funds,
there can be no assurance that such financing sources will continue to be available or will be
available on favorable terms. In a period of financial disruption such as the one currently being
experienced in the U.S. financial system, or if negative developments occur with respect to us, the
availability and cost of the Groups funding sources could be adversely affected. In that event,
the Groups cost of funds may increase, thereby reducing its net interest income, or the Group may
need to dispose of a portion of its investment portfolio, which, depending upon market conditions,
could result in realizing a loss or experiencing other adverse accounting consequences upon the
dispositions. The Groups efforts to monitor and manage liquidity risk may not be successful to
deal with dramatic or unanticipated changes in the global securities markets or other reductions in
liquidity driven by us or market related events. In the event that such sources of funds are
reduced or eliminated and we are not able to replace them on a cost-effective basis, the Group may
be forced to curtail or cease its loan origination business and treasury activities, which would
have a material adverse effect on its operations and financial condition.
As of March 31, 2010, the Group had approximately $592.0 million in investment securities and
$391.8 million in mortgage loans available to cover liquidity needs.
The terms
of the Groups structured repurchase agreements range between
three and ten years, and the counterparties have the right to
exercise at par on a quarterly basis put options before their
contractual maturity from one to three years after the
agreements settlement date.
Operational Risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, personnel and
systems or from external events. All functions, products and services of the Group are susceptible
to operational risk.
The Group faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the activities that
surround the delivery of banking and financial products. Coupled with external influences such as
market conditions, security risks, and legal risk, the potential for operational and reputational
loss has increased. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the Group has developed, and
continues to enhance, specific internal controls, policies and procedures that are designed to
identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. The purpose
of these policies and procedures is to provide reasonable assurance that the Groups business
operations are functioning within established limits.
The Group classifies operational risk into two major categories: business specific and
corporate-wide affecting all business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment group
works with the various business units to ensure consistency in policies, processes and assessments.
With respect to corporate wide risks, such as information security, business recovery, legal and
compliance, the Group has specialized groups, such as Information Security, Corporate Compliance,
Information Technology and Operations. These groups assist the lines of business in the development
and implementation of risk management practices specific to the needs of the business groups. All
these matters are reviewed and discussed in the IT Steering Committee.
60
Table of Contents
The Group is subject to extensive regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it conducts
its business, and this regulatory scrutiny has been significantly increasing over the last several
years. The Group has established and continues to enhance procedures based on legal and regulatory
requirements that are reasonably designed to ensure compliance with all applicable statutory and
regulatory requirements. The Group has a corporate compliance function, headed by a Compliance
Director who reports to the Chief Risk Officer and is responsible for the oversight of regulatory
compliance and implementation of an enterprise-wide compliance program.
Concentration Risk
Substantially all of the Groups business activities and a significant portion of its credit
exposure are concentrated in Puerto Rico. As a consequence, the Groups profitability and
financial condition may be adversely affected by an extended economic slowdown, adverse political
or economic developments in Puerto Rico or the effects of a natural disaster, all of which could
result in a reduction in loan originations, an increase in non-performing assets, an increase in
foreclosure losses on mortgage loans, and a reduction in the value of its loans and loan servicing
portfolio.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico government is currently facing a significant fiscal deficit. The
Commonwealths access to the municipal bond market and its credit ratings depend, in part, on
achieving a balanced budget. In March 2009, the Legislature passed, and Governor signed, laws to
reduce spending by 10% in an attempt to control expenditures, including public-sector employment,
raise revenues through selective tax increases, and stimulate the economy. It is not possible to
determine the impact on the economy of these measures at this time.
Item 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was
carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Groups management, including
the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of the Groups disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon such evaluation, the
CEO and the CFO have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Groups disclosure controls
and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely
basis, information required to be disclosed by the Group in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Groups internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined on rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31,
2010.
61
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Group and its subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings incidental to their
business. The Group is vigorously contesting such claims. Based upon a review by legal counsel and
the development of these matters to date, Management is of the opinion that the ultimate aggregate
liability, if any, resulting from these claims will not have a material adverse effect on the
Groups financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisition of Eurobank.
The success of our acquisition of all of the retail deposits and substantially all of the assets
and operations of Eurobank on April 30, 2010 from the FDIC, as receiver for Eurobank, will depend
on, among other things, our ability to realize anticipated cost savings and to integrate the
acquired Eurobank assets and operations in a manner that permits growth opportunities and does not
materially disrupt our existing customer relationships or result in decreased revenues resulting
from any loss of customers. If we are not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the
anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to
realize than expected. Additionally, we will make fair value estimates of certain assets and
liabilities in recording the acquisition. Actual values of these assets and liabilities could
differ from our estimates, which could result in our not achieving the anticipated benefits of the
acquisition.
We cannot assure you that our acquisition of Eurobank will have positive results,
including results relating to: correctly assessing the asset quality of the assets acquired; the
total cost of integration, including management attention and resources; the time required to
complete the integration successfully; the amount of longer-term cost savings; being able to
profitably deploy funds acquired in the transaction; or the overall performance of the combined
business.
Our future growth and profitability depends, in part, on our ability to successfully manage the
combined operations. Integration of an acquired business can be complex and costly, sometimes
including combining relevant accounting and data processing systems and management controls, as
well as managing relevant relationships with employees, clients, suppliers and other business
partners. Integration efforts could divert management attention and resources, which could
adversely affect our operations or results. The loss of key employees in connection with this
acquisition could adversely affect our ability to successfully conduct the combined operations.
Given the continued economic recession in Puerto Rico, notwithstanding our loss-sharing
arrangements with the FDIC with respect to certain Eurobank assets that we acquired, we may
continue to experience increased credit costs or need to take
additional markdowns and make additional provisions to the allowances
for loan losses on the assets and loans acquired that could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations in the future. There is no assurance that as our integration
efforts continue in connection with this transaction, other unanticipated costs, including the
diversion of personnel, or losses, will not be incurred.
Our acquisition of Eurobank may also result in business disruptions that cause us to lose customers
or cause customers to move their accounts or business to competing financial institutions. It is
possible that the integration process related to this acquisition could disrupt our ongoing
business or result in inconsistencies in customer service that could adversely affect our ability to maintain
relationships with clients, customers, depositors and employees.
Loans that we acquired in the Eurobank transaction may not be covered by the loss sharing
agreements if the FDIC determines that we have not adequately performed under these agreements or if the
loss sharing agreements have ended.
Although
the FDIC has agreed to reimburse us for 80% of qualifying losses on covered loans, the FDIC has the right to refuse or delay payment for loan losses if the loss sharing
agreements are not performed by the Group in accordance with their terms. Additionally, the loss sharing
agreements have limited terms. Therefore, any charge-offs that we experience after the terms of
the loss sharing agreements have ended would not be recoverable from the FDIC.
Certain provisions of the loss sharing agreements entered into with the FDIC may have
anti-takeover effects and could limit the ability of the Group to engage in certain strategic
transactions the Groups Board of Directors believes would be in the best interests of
shareholders.
The FDICs agreement to bear 80% of qualifying losses on single family residential loans for ten
years and commercial loans for five years is a significant asset of the Group and a feature of
the Eurobank acquisition without which we would not have entered into the transaction. Our
agreement with the FDIC requires that we receive prior FDIC consent, which may be withheld by the
FDIC in its sole discretion, prior to us or our shareholders engaging in certain transactions. If
any such transaction is completed without prior FDIC consent, the FDIC would have the right to
discontinue the loss sharing arrangement.
Among other things, prior FDIC consent is required for (a) a merger or consolidation of the Group
with or into another company if our shareholders will own less than 2/3 of the combined company and
(b) a sale of shares by one or more of our shareholders that will effect a change in control of
Oriental Bank, as determined by the FDIC with reference to the standards set forth in the Change in
Bank Control Act (generally, the acquisition of between 10% and 25% of the Groups voting
securities where the presumption of control is not rebutted, or the acquisition of more than 25% of
the Groups voting securities). Such a sale by shareholders may occur beyond the Groups
control. If the Group or any shareholder desired to enter into any such transaction, there can
be no assurances that the FDIC would grant its consent in a timely manner, without conditions, or
at all. If one of these transactions were to occur without prior FDIC consent and the FDIC
withdrew its loss share protection, there could be a material adverse impact on the Group.
62
Table of Contents
Item 6. | EXHIBITS |
10.1 | Underwriting Agreement, dated May 16, 2010, between the Group and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., as representative of the several underwriters named therein.* | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit No. 1.1 of the Groups current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 19, 2010. |
63
Table of Contents
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
(Registrant)
(Registrant)
By:
|
/s/ José Rafael Fernández | Date: May 7, 2010 | ||||
José Rafael Fernández | ||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
By:
|
/s/ Norberto González | Date: May 7, 2010 | ||||
Norberto González | ||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
64