-
Annual Statements
-
»
Companies
-
»
OFG BANCORP
-
»
Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)
OFG BANCORP - Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018
or
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from ______________ to ______________
Commission File
No. 001-12647
OFG Bancorp
Incorporated in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
IRS Employer
Identification No. 66-0538893
Principal Executive
Offices:
254 Muñoz
Rivera Avenue
San Juan,
Puerto Rico 00918
Telephone Number:
(787) 771-6800
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of
the Act:
Common Stock
($1.00 par value per share)
7.125% Noncumulative
Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A ($25.00 liquidation preference per share)
7.0% Noncumulative
Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B ($25.00 liquidation preference per share)
7.125% Noncumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D ($25.00 liquidation preference per share)
Securities Registered
Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filings pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions
of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer ☐
|
Accelerated filer ☑
|
Non-accelerated filer ☐
|
Smaller
reporting company ☐
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Emerging Growth Company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark
if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Ac.t ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
The
aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of OFG
Bancorp (the “Company”) was approximately $618.0 million as of June 30,
2018 based upon 43,983,195 shares outstanding and the reported closing
price of $14.05 on the New York Stock Exchange on that date.
As of
February 28, 2019, the Company had 51,318,899 shares of common stock
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Company’s definitive
proxy statement relating to the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders are
incorporated herein by reference in response to Items 10 through 14 of
Part III, except for certain information set forth herein under Item 12.
OFG Bancorp
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
The information
included in this annual report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements may relate to the financial condition, results of operations, plans,
objectives, future performance and business of OFG Bancorp (“we,” “our,” “us”
or “Oriental”), including, but not limited to, statements with respect to the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, delinquency trends, market risk and
the impact of interest rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital
adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal proceedings and new accounting
standards on the Oriental’s financial condition and results of operations. All
statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking,
and the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continues,” “expect,” “estimate,”
“intend,” “project” and similar expressions and future or conditional verbs
such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “can,” “may,” or similar
expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties,
estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict. Various
factors, some of which by their nature are beyond Oriental’s control, could
cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied
by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference
include, but are not limited to:
·
the rate of growth in
the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and economic
conditions;
·
changes in interest
rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes;
·
the credit default by municipalities
of the government of Puerto Rico;
·
amendments to the
fiscal plan approved by the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto
Rico;
·
determinations in the
court-supervised debt-restructuring process under Title III of PROMESA for the
Puerto Rico government and all of its agencies, including some of its public
corporations;
·
the impact of property,
credit and other losses in Puerto Rico as a result of hurricanes, earthquakes
and other natural disasters;
·
the amount of
government, private and philanthropic financial assistance for the reconstruction
of Puerto Rico’s critical infrastructure, which suffered catastrophic damages
caused by hurricane Maria;
·
the pace and magnitude
of Puerto Rico’s economic recovery;
·
the fiscal and monetary
policies of the federal government and its agencies;
·
changes in federal bank
regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels of capital;
·
the relative strength
or weakness of the commercial and consumer credit sectors and the real estate
market in Puerto Rico;
·
the performance of the
stock and bond markets;
·
competition in the
financial services industry; and
·
possible legislative,
tax or regulatory changes.
Other possible events or
factors that could cause results or performance to differ materially from those
expressed in these forward-looking statements include the following: negative
economic conditions that adversely affect the general economy, housing prices,
the job market, consumer confidence and spending habits which may affect, among
other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs and provision
expense; changes in interest rates and market liquidity which may reduce
interest margins, impact funding sources and affect the ability to originate
and distribute financial products in the primary and secondary markets; adverse
movements and volatility in debt and equity capital markets; changes in market
rates and prices which may adversely impact the value of financial assets and
liabilities; liabilities resulting from litigation and regulatory
investigations; changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations;
increased competition; Oriental’s ability to grow its core businesses;
decisions to downsize, sell or close units or otherwise change Oriental’s
business mix; and management’s ability to identify and manage these and other
risks.
All forward-looking
statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K are based upon
information available to Oriental as of the date of this report, and other than
as required by law, including the requirements of applicable securities laws,
Oriental assumes no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking
statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances
after the date of such statements.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Oriental is a publicly-owned financial holding company
incorporated on June 14, 1996 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, providing a full range of banking and financial services through its
subsidiaries. Oriental is subject to the provisions of the U.S. Bank
Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, (the “BHC Act”) and accordingly,
subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”).
Oriental provides comprehensive banking and financial
services to its clients through a complete range of banking and financial
solutions, including commercial, consumer, auto, and mortgage lending; checking
and savings accounts; financial planning, insurance, financial services, and
investment brokerage; and corporate and individual trust and retirement
services. Oriental operates through three major business segments: Banking,
Wealth Management, and Treasury, differentiating the Oriental brand through
customer segmentation and innovative solutions, primarily in Puerto Rico.
Oriental provides these services through various subsidiaries including, a
commercial bank, Oriental Bank (the "Bank"), a securities
broker-dealer, Oriental Financial Services Corp. (“Oriental Financial Services”),
an insurance agency, Oriental Insurance, LLC (“Oriental Insurance”), a
retirement plan administrator, Oriental Pension Consultants, Inc. (“OPC”), and
a commercial lender, OFG USA LLC ("OFG USA"), which is part of the
Bank. All of our subsidiaries are based in San Juan, Puerto Rico, except for
OPC which is based in Boca Raton, Florida and OFG USA which is based in
Cornelius, North Carolina. Oriental has 37 branches in Puerto Rico. Oriental’s
long-term goal is to strengthen its banking and financial services franchise by
expanding its lending businesses, increasing the level of integration in the
marketing and delivery of banking and financial services, maintaining effective
asset-liability management, growing non-interest revenue from banking and
financial services, and improving operating efficiencies.
Oriental’s strategy involves:
·
Expanding its ability to attract
deposits and build relationships with customers by refining service delivery
and providing innovative banking technologies for day-to-day customer
transactions, and achieving sustainable levels of differentiation in the
market;
·
Focusing on greater growth in
commercial and consumer lending, trust and financial services, and insurance
products;
·
Improving operating efficiencies,
and continuing to maintain effective asset-liability management;
·
Implementing a broad ranging
effort to instill in employees and make customers aware of Oriental’s
determination to effectively serve and advise its customer base in a responsive
and professional manner; and
·
Matching its portfolio of
investment securities with the related funding to achieve favorable spreads,
and primarily investing in U.S. government-sponsored agency obligations.
Together with a highly experienced group of senior and
mid-level executives and the benefits from the acquisitions of Eurobank Puerto
Rico and the Puerto Rico operations of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
(“BBVA”), this strategy has resulted in sustained growth in Oriental’s
deposit-taking activities, commercial, consumer and mortgage lending and
financial service activities, allowing Oriental to distinguish itself in a
highly competitive industry. Oriental is not immune from general and local
financial and economic conditions. Past experience is not necessarily
indicative of future performance but given market uncertainties and on a
reasonable time horizon of three to five years, this strategy is expected to
maintain its steady progress towards Oriental’s long-term goal.
Oriental’s principal funding sources are branch
deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, Federal Home Loan
Bank (“FHLB”) advances, wholesale deposits, and subordinated capital notes.
Through its branch network, Oriental Bank offers personal non-interest and
interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, certificates of deposit,
individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”) and commercial non-interest bearing
checking accounts. The FDIC insures the Bank’s deposit accounts up to
applicable limits. Management makes retail deposit pricing decisions
periodically, adjusting the rates paid on retail deposits in response to
general market conditions and local competition. Pricing decisions take into
account the rates being offered by other local banks, the London Interbank
Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), and mainland U.S. market interest rates.
Segment Disclosure
Oriental has three reportable segments: Banking,
Wealth Management, and Treasury. Management established the reportable segments
based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess
where to allocate resources. Other factors such as Oriental’s organizational
structure, nature of products, distribution channels and economic
characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of
the reportable segments. Oriental measures the performance of these reportable
segments based on pre-established annual goals involving different financial
parameters such as net income, interest rate spread, loan production, and fees
generated.
For detailed information regarding the performance of
Oriental’s operating segments, please refer to Note 29 in Oriental’s
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Banking Activities
The Bank, Oriental’s main subsidiary, is a
full-service Puerto Rico commercial bank with its main office located in
San Juan, Puerto Rico. The Bank has 37 branches throughout Puerto Rico and
was incorporated in October 1964 as a federal mutual savings and loan
association. It became a federal mutual savings bank in July 1983 and converted
to a federal stock savings bank in April 1987. Its conversion from a
federally-chartered savings bank to a commercial bank chartered under the
banking law of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, on June 30, 1994, allowed
the Bank to more effectively pursue opportunities in its market and obtain more
flexibility in its businesses. As a Puerto Rico-chartered commercial bank, it
is subject to examination by the FDIC and the Office of the Commissioner of
Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico (the “OCFI”). The Bank offers banking
services such as commercial, consumer, and mortgage lending, savings and time
deposit products, financial planning, and corporate and individual trust services,
and capitalizes on its retail banking network to provide commercial and
mortgage lending products to its clients. The Bank has an operating subsidiary,
OFG USA, which is organized in Delaware. It also has two international banking
entities (each an “IBE”) organized in Puerto Rico pursuant to the International
Banking Center Regulatory Act of Puerto Rico, as amended (the “IBE Act”), one
is a unit operating within the Bank, named Oriental Overseas (the “IBE Unit”),
and the other is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, named Oriental
International Bank, Inc. (the “IBE Subsidiary”). The IBE Unit and IBE
Subsidiary offer the Bank certain Puerto Rico tax advantages, and their
services are limited under Puerto Rico law to persons and assets/liabilities
located outside of Puerto Rico.
Banking activities include the Bank’s branches and
mortgage banking activities with traditional retail banking products such as
deposits, commercial loans, consumer loans and mortgage loans. The Bank’s
significant lending activities are with consumers located in Puerto Rico. The
Bank’s lending transactions include a diversified number of industries and
activities, all of which are encompassed within four main categories:
commercial, consumer, mortgage and auto.
Oriental’s mortgage banking activities are conducted
through a division of the Bank. The mortgage banking activities include the
origination of mortgage loans for the Bank’s own portfolio, and the sale of
loans directly into the secondary market or the securitization of conforming
loans into mortgage-backed securities. The Bank originates Federal Housing
Administration (“FHA”) insured mortgages, Veterans Administration (“VA”)
guaranteed mortgages, and Rural Housing Service (“RHS”) guaranteed loans that
are primarily securitized for issuance of Government National Mortgage
Association (“GNMA”) mortgage-backed securities which can be resold to
individual or institutional investors in the secondary market. Conventional
loans that meet the underwriting requirements for sale or exchange under
standard Federal National Mortgage Association (the “FNMA”) or the Federal Home
Loan Mortgage Corporation (the “FHLMC”) programs are referred to as conforming
mortgage loans and are also securitized for issuance of FNMA or FHLMC mortgage-backed
securities. The Bank is an approved seller of FNMA and FHLMC mortgage loans for
issuance of FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed securities. The Bank is also an
approved issuer of GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Oriental outsources the
servicing of the residential mortgage loan portfolio acquired in 2012 as part
of its acquisition of the Puerto Rico operations of BBVA (the "BBVAPR
Acquisition") and services the GNMA, FNMA, and FHLMC pools that it issues
and the rest of its residential mortgage loan portfolio.
Loan Underwriting
Auto loans: Oriental provides financing for the
purchase of new or used motor vehicles. These loans are generated mainly
through dealers authorized and approved by the auto credit department committee
of Oriental. The auto credit department has the specialized structure and
resources to provide the service required for this product according to market
demands and trends. The auto loan credit policy establishes specific guidance
and parameters for the underwriting and origination processes. Underwriting
procedures, lending
limits, interest rate approval,
insurance coverage, and automobile brand restrictions are some parameters and
internal controls implemented to ensure the quality and profitability of the
auto loan portfolio. The proprietary credit scoring system is a fundamental
part of the decision process.
Consumer loans: Consumer loans include personal
loans, credit cards, lines of credit and other loans made by banks to
individual borrowers. All loan originations must be underwritten in accordance
with Oriental’s underwriting criteria and include an assessment of each
borrower’s personal financial condition, including verification of income,
assets, Fair Isaac Corporation ("FICO") score, and credit reports.
The proprietary credit scoring system is a fundamental part of the decision
process.
Residential mortgage loans: All loan originations,
regardless of whether originated through Oriental’s retail banking network or
purchased from third parties, must be underwritten in accordance with
Oriental’s underwriting criteria, including loan-to-value ratios, borrower
income qualifications, debt ratios and credit history, investor requirements,
and title insurance and property appraisal requirements. Oriental’s mortgage
underwriting standards comply with the relevant guidelines set forth by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), VA, FNMA, FHLMC, federal
and Puerto Rico banking regulatory authorities, as applicable. Oriental’s
underwriting personnel, while operating within Oriental’s loan offices, make
underwriting decisions independent of Oriental’s mortgage loan origination
personnel.
Commercial loans: Commercial loans include lines of
credit and term facilities to finance business operations and to provide
working capital for specific purposes, such as to finance the purchase of
assets, equipment or inventory. Since a borrower’s cash flow from operations is
generally the primary source of repayment, Oriental’s analysis of the credit
risk focuses heavily on the borrower’s debt-repayment capacity. Commercial term
loans generally have terms from one to five years, may be collateralized by the
asset being acquired, real estate, or other available assets, and bear interest
rates that float with the prime rate, LIBOR or another established index, or
are fixed for the term of the loan. Lines of credit are extended to businesses
based on an analysis of the financial strength and integrity of the borrowers
and are generally secured primarily by real estate, accounts receivables or
inventory, and have a maturity of one year or less. Such lines of credit bear
an interest rate that floats with a base rate, the prime rate, LIBOR, or
another established index.
Sale of Loans and Securitization Activities
Oriental may engage in the sale or securitization of
the residential mortgage loans that it originates. Oriental is an approved
issuer of GNMA-guaranteed mortgage-backed securities which involves the
packaging of FHA loans, RHS loans and VA loans into pools. Oriental can also
act as issuer in the case of conforming conventional loans which involves
grouping these types of loans into pools and issuing FNMA or FHLMC
mortgage-backed securities. The issuance of mortgage-backed securities provides
Oriental with the flexibility of either selling the security into the open
market or retaining it on books. In the case of conforming conventional loans,
Oriental may also sell such loans through the FNMA and FHLMC cash window
programs.
Wealth Management Activities
Wealth management activities are generated by such
businesses as securities brokerage, trust services, retirement planning,
insurance, pension administration, and other financial services.
Oriental Financial Services is a Puerto Rico
corporation and Oriental’s subsidiary engaged in securities brokerage
activities in accordance with Oriental’s strategy of providing fully integrated
financial solutions, covering various investment alternatives such as
tax-advantaged fixed income securities, mutual funds, stocks, and bonds to
retail and institutional clients. It also offers separately-managed accounts
and mutual fund asset allocation programs sponsored by unaffiliated
professional asset managers. These services are designed to meet each client’s
specific needs and preferences, including transaction-based pricing and
asset-based fee pricing. It has managed and participated in public offerings
and private placements of debt and equity securities in Puerto Rico and has
engaged in municipal securities business with the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
and its instrumentalities, municipalities, and public corporations. Oriental
Financial Services, a member of FINRA and the Securities Investor Protection
Corporation, is a registered securities broker-dealer pursuant to
Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The broker-dealer
does not carry customer accounts and is, accordingly, exempt from the Customer
Protection Rule (SEC Rule 15c3-3) pursuant to subsection (k)(2)(ii) of
such rule. It clears securities transactions through Pershing LLC, a clearing
agent that carries the accounts of its customers on a “fully disclosed” basis.
Oriental Insurance is a Puerto Rico limited liability
company and Oriental’s subsidiary engaged in insurance agency services. It
provides Oriental with cross-marketing opportunities under the legal framework
established by the financial modernization legislation.
Oriental
Insurance currently earns commissions by acting as a licensed insurance agent
in connection with the issuance of insurance policies by unaffiliated insurance
companies and continues to cross market its services to Oriental’s existing
customer base.
OPC, a Florida corporation, is Oriental’s subsidiary
engaged in the administration of retirement plans in the U.S., Puerto Rico, and
the Caribbean.
Corporate and individual trust services
are provided by the Bank’s trust division.
Treasury Activities
Treasury activities encompass all of Oriental’s
treasury-related functions. Oriental’s investment portfolio consists of
mortgage-backed securities, obligations of U.S. government-sponsored
agencies and money market instruments. Agency mortgage-backed securities, the
largest component of the investment portfolio, consist principally of pools of
residential mortgage loans that are made to consumers and then resold in the
form of pass-through certificates in the secondary market, the payment of
interest and principal of which is guaranteed by GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC.
Market Area and Competition
The main geographic business and service area of
Oriental is in Puerto Rico, where the banking market is highly competitive.
Puerto Rico banks are subject to the same federal laws, regulations and
supervision that apply to similar institutions in the United States of America.
Oriental also competes with brokerage firms with retail operations, credit
unions, savings and loan cooperatives, small loan companies, insurance agencies,
and mortgage banks in Puerto Rico. Oriental encounters intense competition in
attracting and retaining deposits and in its consumer and commercial lending
activities. Management believes that Oriental has been able to compete
effectively for deposits and loans by offering a variety of transactional
account products and loans with competitive terms, emphasizing the quality of
its service, pricing its products at competitive interest rates, offering
convenient branch locations, and offering financial planning and financial
services at most of its branch locations. The phase-out consolidation of three
failed Puerto Rico banks in 2010 and the failure of another Puerto Rico bank in
2015 has created an environment for more rational loan and deposit pricing. Oriental’s
ability to originate loans depends primarily on the services that it provides
to its borrowers, in making prompt credit decisions, and on the rates and fees
that it charges.
Oriental is also developing new commercial
relationships in the United States, as it launched in late 2017 the U.S.
commercial loan program, generally consisting of purchases of loan
participations in credit facilities to commercial borrowers in the U.S.
mainland.
Regulation and Supervision
General
Oriental is a financial holding company subject to
supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve Board under the BHC Act, as
amended by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The qualification requirements
and the process for a bank holding company that elects to be treated as a
financial holding company requires that a bank holding company and all of the
subsidiary banks controlled by it at the time of election must be and remain at
all times “well capitalized” and “well managed.”
Oriental elected to be treated as a financial holding
company as permitted by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Under that law, if Oriental
fails to meet the requirements for being a financial holding company and is
unable to correct such deficiencies within certain prescribed time periods, the
Federal Reserve Board could require Oriental to divest control of its
depository institution subsidiary or alternatively cease conducting activities
that are not permissible for bank holding companies that are not financial
holding companies.
Financial holding companies may engage, directly or
indirectly, in any activity that is determined to be (i) financial in
nature or incidental to such financial activity, or (ii) complementary to
a financial activity provided it does not pose a substantial risk to the safety
and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally. The
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act specifically provides that the following activities have
been determined to be “financial in nature”: (a) lending, trust and other
banking activities; (b) insurance activities; (c) financial,
investment or economic advisory services; (d) securitization of assets;
(e) securities underwriting and dealing; (f) existing bank holding
company domestic activities; (g) existing bank holding company foreign
activities; and (h) merchant banking activities. A financial holding
company may generally commence any activity, or acquire any company, that is
financial in nature without prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. As
provided by the Dodd-Frank Act, a financial holding
company
may not acquire a company, without prior Federal Reserve Board approval, in a
transaction in which the total consolidated assets to be acquired by the
financial holding company exceed $10 billion.
In addition, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act specifically
gives the Federal Reserve Board the authority, by regulation or order, to
expand the list of financial or incidental activities, but requires
consultation with the U.S. Treasury Department and gives the Federal
Reserve Board authority to allow a financial holding company to engage in any
activity that is complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a
substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the
financial system.
Oriental is required to file with the Federal Reserve
Board and the SEC periodic reports and other information concerning its own
business operations and those of its subsidiaries. In addition, Federal Reserve
Board approval must also be obtained before a bank holding company acquires all
or substantially all of the assets of another bank or merges or consolidates
with another bank holding company. The Federal Reserve Board also has the
authority to issue cease and desist orders against bank holding companies and
their non-bank subsidiaries.
The Bank is regulated by various agencies in the
United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Its main regulators are the
OCFI and the FDIC. The Bank is subject to extensive regulation and examination
by the OCFI and the FDIC and is subject to the Federal Reserve Board’s
regulation of transactions between the Bank and its affiliates. The federal and
Puerto Rico laws and regulations which are applicable to the Bank regulate,
among other things, the scope of its business, its investments, its reserves
against deposits, the timing of the availability of deposited funds, and the
nature and amount of and collateral for certain loans. In addition to the
impact of such regulations, commercial banks are affected significantly by the
actions of the Federal Reserve Board as it attempts to control the money supply
and credit availability in order to control inflation in the economy.
Oriental’s mortgage banking business is subject to the
rules and regulations of FHA, VA, RHS, FNMA, FHLMC, HUD and GNMA with respect
to the origination, processing, servicing and selling of mortgage loans and the
sale of mortgage-backed securities. Those rules and regulations, among other
things, prohibit discrimination and establish underwriting guidelines which
include provisions for inspections and appraisal reports, require credit
reports on prospective borrowers and fix maximum loan amounts, and, with respect
to VA loans, fix maximum interest rates. Mortgage origination activities are
subject to, among others, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the
Truth-in-Lending Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the
regulations promulgated thereunder which, among other things, prohibit
discrimination and require the disclosure of certain basic information to
mortgagors concerning credit terms and settlement costs. Oriental is also
subject to regulation by the OCFI with respect to, among other things, licensing
requirements and maximum origination fees on certain types of mortgage loan
products.
Oriental and its subsidiaries are subject to the rules
and regulations of certain other regulatory agencies. Oriental Financial
Services, as a registered broker-dealer, is subject to the supervision,
examination and regulation of FINRA, the SEC, and the OCFI in matters relating
to the conduct of its securities business, including record keeping and
reporting requirements, supervision and licensing of employees, and obligations
to customers.
Oriental Insurance is subject to the supervision,
examination and regulation of the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance of
Puerto Rico in matters relating to insurance sales, including but not limited
to, licensing of employees, sales practices, charging of commissions and
reporting requirements.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act
The Dodd-Frank Act implemented a variety of
far-reaching changes and has been described as the most sweeping reform of the
financial services industry since the 1930’s. It has a broad impact on the
financial services industry, including significant regulatory and compliance
changes, such as: (i) enhanced resolution authority of troubled and
failing banks and their holding companies; (ii) enhanced lending limits
strengthening the existing limits on a depository institution’s credit exposure
to one borrower; (iii) increased capital and liquidity requirements;
(iv) increased regulatory examination fees; (v) changes to assessments
to be paid to the FDIC for federal deposit insurance; (vi) prohibiting
bank holding companies, such as Oriental, from including in regulatory
Tier 1 capital future issuances of trust preferred securities or other
hybrid debt and equity securities; and (vii) numerous other provisions
designed to improve supervision and oversight of, and strengthening safety and
soundness for, the financial services sector. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act
established a new framework for systemic risk oversight within the financial
system to be distributed among new and existing federal regulatory agencies,
including the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Federal Reserve Board,
the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC. Further, the
Dodd-Frank Act addresses many corporate governance and executive compensation
matters that affect most U.S. publicly traded companies, including
Oriental. A few provisions
of the Dodd-Frank Act became
effective immediately, while various provisions have become effective in
stages. Many of the requirements called for in the Dodd-Frank Act have been
implemented over time and most are subject to implementing regulations.
The
Dodd-Frank Act also created a new consumer financial services regulator, the
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (the “CFPB”), which assumed most of the
consumer financial services regulatory responsibilities previously exercised by
federal banking regulators and other agencies. The CFPB’s primary functions
include the supervision of “covered persons” (broadly defined to include any
person offering or providing a consumer financial product or service and any
affiliated service provider) for compliance with federal consumer financial
laws. It has primary authority to enforce the federal consumer financial laws,
as well as exclusive authority to require reports and conduct examinations for
compliance with such laws, in the case of any insured depository institution
with total assets of more than $10 billion and any affiliate thereof. The CFPB
also has broad powers to prescribe rules applicable to a covered person or
service provider in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a
consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial
product or service.
Holding Company Structure
The Bank is subject to restrictions under federal laws
that limit the transfer of funds to its affiliates (including Oriental),
whether in the form of loans, other extensions of credit, investments or asset
purchases, among others. Such transfers are limited to 10% of the transferring
institution’s capital stock and surplus with respect to any affiliate
(including Oriental), and, with respect to all affiliates, to an aggregate of
20% of the transferring institution’s capital stock and surplus. Furthermore,
such loans and extensions of credit are required to be secured in specified
amounts, carried out on an arm’s length basis, and consistent with safe and
sound banking practices.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, a bank holding company, such
as Oriental, must serve as a source of financial strength for any subsidiary
depository institution. The term “source of financial strength” is defined as
the ability of a company to provide financial assistance to its insured
depository institution subsidiaries in the event of financial distress at such
subsidiaries. This support may be required at times when, absent such
requirement, the bank holding company might not otherwise provide such support.
In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank
holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain capital of a
subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and be entitled to a
priority of payment. In addition, any capital loans by a bank holding company to
any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and
to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. The Bank is currently
the only depository institution subsidiary of Oriental.
Since Oriental is a financial holding company, its
right to participate in the assets of any subsidiary upon the latter’s
liquidation or reorganization will be subject to the prior claims of the
subsidiary’s creditors (including depositors in the case of the Bank) except to
the extent that Oriental is a creditor with recognized claims against the
subsidiary.
Dividend Restrictions
The principal source of funds for Oriental is the
dividends from the Bank. The ability of the Bank to pay dividends on its common
stock is restricted by the Puerto Rico Banking Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Banking Act”), the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (the “FDIA”), and
the FDIC regulations. In general terms, the Banking Act provides that when the
expenditures of a bank are greater than its receipts, the excess of
expenditures over receipts shall be charged against the undistributed profits
of the bank and the balance, if any, shall be charged against the required
reserve fund of the bank. If there is no sufficient reserve fund to cover such
balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount shall be charged against
the bank’s capital account. The Banking Act provides that until said capital
has been restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the
original capital, the bank may not declare any dividends. In general terms, the
FDIA and the FDIC regulations restrict the payment of dividends when a bank is
undercapitalized, when a bank has failed to pay insurance assessments, or when
there are safety and soundness concerns regarding a bank.
The payment of dividends by the Bank may also be
affected by other regulatory requirements and policies, such as maintenance of
adequate capital. If, in the opinion of the regulatory authority, a depository
institution under its jurisdiction is engaged in, or is about to engage in, an
unsafe or unsound practice (that, depending on the financial condition of the
depository institution, could include the payment of dividends), such authority
may require, after notice and hearing, that such depository institution cease
and desist from such practice. The Federal Reserve Board has a policy statement
that provides that an insured bank or bank holding company should not maintain
its existing rate of cash dividends on common stock unless (i) the
organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year
has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends and (ii) the prospective rate
of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs,
asset quality, and overall financial condition. In addition, all insured
depository institutions are subject to the capital-based
limitations required by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement
Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”).
Federal Home Loan Bank System
The FHLB system, of which the Bank is a member,
consists of 12 regional FHLBs governed and regulated by the Federal Housing
Finance Agency. The FHLB serves as a credit facility for member institutions
within their assigned regions. They are funded primarily from proceeds derived
from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system. They make loans
(i.e., advances) to members in accordance with policies and procedures
established by the FHLB and the boards of directors of each regional FHLB.
As a system member, the Bank is entitled to borrow
from the FHLB of New York (the “FHLB-NY”) and is required to invest in FHLB
membership and activity-based stock. The Bank must purchase membership stock
equal to the greater of $1,000 or 0.15% of certain mortgage-related assets held
by the Bank. The Bank is also required to purchase activity-based stock equal
to 4.50% of outstanding advances to the Bank by the FHLB. The Bank is in
compliance with the membership and activity-based stock ownership requirements
described above. All loans, advances and other extensions of credit made by the
FHLB to the Bank are secured by a portion of the Bank’s mortgage loan
portfolio, certain other investments, and the capital stock of the FHLB held by
the Bank. The Bank is required to maintain a minimum amount of qualifying
collateral with a fair value of at least 110% of the outstanding advances.
Prompt Corrective Action Regulations
Pursuant
to the Dodd-Frank Act, federal banking agencies adopted capital rules based on
the framework of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in “Basel III: A
Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems”
(“Basel III”), which became effective January 1, 2014 for advanced approaches
banking organizations (i.e., those with consolidated assets greater than $250
billion or consolidated on-balance sheet foreign exposures of at least $10
billion) and January 1, 2015 for all other covered organizations (subject to
certain phase-in periods through January 1, 2019) replaced their general
risk-based capital rules, advanced approaches rule, market risk rule, and
leverage rules.
The
Basel III capital rules provide certain changes to the prompt corrective action
regulations adopted by the agencies under Section 38 of the FDIA, as amended by
FDICIA. These regulations are designed to place restrictions on U.S. insured
depository institutions if their capital levels begin to show signs of
weakness. The five capital categories established by the agencies under their
prompt corrective action framework are: “well capitalized,” “adequately
capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and
“critically undercapitalized”.
The
Basel III capital rules expand such categories by introducing a common equity
tier 1 capital requirement for all depository institutions, revising the
minimum risk-based capital ratios and, beginning in 2018, the proposed
supplementary leverage requirement for advanced approaches banking
organizations. The common equity tier 1 capital ratio is a new minimum
requirement designed to ensure that banking organizations hold sufficient
high-quality regulatory capital that is available to absorb losses on a
going-concern basis. Under such rules, an insured depository institution is:
(i) “well
capitalized,” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or more, a tier
1 risk-based capital ratio of 8% or more, a common equity tier 1 capital ratio
of 6.5% or more, and a tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 5% or more, and is
not subject to any written capital order or directive;
(ii) “adequately
capitalized,” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% or more, a
tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or more, a common equity tier 1
capital ratio of 4.5% or more, and a tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 4%
or more;
(iii) “undercapitalized,”
if it has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8%, a tier 1
risk-based ratio that is less than 6%, a common equity tier 1 capital ratio
that is less than 4.5%, or a tier 1 leverage capital ratio that is less
than 4%;
(iv)
“significantly undercapitalized,” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio
that is less than 6%, a tier 1 risk-based capital ratio that is less than
4%, a common equity tier 1 capital ratio that is less than 3%, or a tier 1
leverage capital ratio that is less than 3%; and
(v) “critically
undercapitalized,” if it has a ratio of tangible equity (defined as tier 1
capital plus non-tier 1 perpetual preferred stock) to total assets that is
equal to or less than 2%.
The new capital rules also include
a policy statement by the agencies that all banking organizations should
maintain capital commensurate with their risk profiles,
which may entail holding capital significantly above the minimum requirements.
They also provide a reservation of authority permitting examiners to require
that such
organizations
hold additional regulatory capital.
FDICIA generally prohibits a depository institution
from making any capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or
paying any management fees to its holding company if the depository institution
would thereafter be undercapitalized. Undercapitalized depository institutions
are subject to restrictions on borrowing from the Federal Reserve System. In
addition, undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to growth
limitations and are required to submit capital restoration plans. A depository
institution’s holding company must guarantee the capital plan, up to an amount
equal to the lesser of 5% of the depository institution’s assets at the time it
becomes undercapitalized or the amount of the capital deficiency when the
institution fails to comply with the plan. The federal banking agencies may not
accept a capital plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is
based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the
depository institution’s capital. Significantly undercapitalized depository
institutions may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions,
including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately
capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets, and cessation of receipt of
deposits from correspondent banks. Critically undercapitalized depository
institutions are subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator.
FDIC Insurance Assessments
The Bank is subject to FDIC deposit insurance
assessments. The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the “Reform
Act”) merged the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) and the Savings Association
Insurance Fund (“SAIF”) into a single Deposit Insurance Fund, and increased the
maximum amount of the insurance coverage for certain retirement accounts, and
possible “inflation adjustments” in the maximum amount of coverage available
with respect to other insured accounts. In addition, it granted a one-time
initial assessment credit (of approximately $4.7 billion) to recognize
institutions’ past contributions to the fund. As a result of the merger of the
BIF and the SAIF, all insured institutions are subject to the same assessment
rate schedule.
The Dodd-Frank Act contains several important deposit
insurance reforms, including the following: (i) the maximum deposit
insurance amount was permanently increased to $250,000; (ii) the deposit
insurance assessment is now based on the insured depository institution’s
average consolidated assets minus its average tangible equity, rather than on
its deposit base; (iii) the minimum reserve ratio for the Deposit
Insurance Fund was raised from 1.15% to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits by
September 30, 2020; (iv) the FDIC is required to “offset the effect”
of increased assessments on insured depository institutions with total
consolidated assets of less than $10 billion; (v) the FDIC is no
longer required to pay dividends if the Deposit Insurance Fund’s reserve ratio
is greater than the minimum ratio; and (vi) the FDIC temporarily insured
the full amount of qualifying “noninterest-bearing transaction accounts” until
December 31, 2012. As defined in the Dodd-Frank Act, a “noninterest-bearing
transaction account” is a deposit or account maintained at a depository
institution with respect to which interest is neither accrued nor paid, on
which the depositor or account holder is permitted to make withdrawals by
negotiable or transferrable instrument, payment orders of withdrawals,
telephone or other electronic media transfers, or other similar items for the
purpose of making payments or transfers to third parties or others, and on
which the insured depository institution does not reserve the right to require
advance notice of an intended withdrawal.
The FDIC amended its regulations under the FDIA, as
amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, to modify the definition of a depository
institution’s insurance assessment base; to revise the deposit insurance
assessment rate schedules in light of the new assessment base and altered
adjustments; to implement the dividend provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act; and to
revise the large insured depository institution assessment system to better
differentiate for risk and better take into account losses from large
institution failures that the FDIC may incur. Since the new assessment base
under the Dodd-Frank Act is larger than the current assessment base, the new
assessment rates adopted by the FDIC are lower than the former rates.
In 2016, the FDIC adopted two new rules to require
large institutions to bear the burden of raising the reserve ratio from 1.15%
to 1.35% and amended the pricing for small institutions after the reserve ratio
reaches 1.15%. Once the reserve ratio reaches 1.38%, small institutions will
receive credits to offset their contribution to raising the reserve ratio above
1.35%. Effective June 30, 2016, the reserve ratio reached 1.15%, and
assessment collections decreased for small institutions like the Bank.
Furthermore, on September 30, 2018, the reserve ratio reached 1.36%, exceeding
the statutorily required minimum reserve ratio of 1.35% ahead of the September
30, 2020 deadline required under the Dodd-Frank Act, and small institutions
like the Bank were awarded assessment credits for the portion of their
assessments that contributed to the growth in the reserve ratio from 1.15% to
1.35%, which will be applied when the reserve ratio is at least 1.38%.
Brokered
Deposits
FDIC regulations adopted
under the FDIA govern the receipt of brokered deposits by banks. Well
capitalized institutions are not subject to limitations on brokered deposits,
while adequately capitalized institutions are able to accept, renew or rollover
brokered deposits only with a waiver from the FDIC and subject to certain
restrictions on the interest paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized
institutions are not permitted to accept brokered deposits. As of December 31,
2018, the Bank is a well capitalized institution and is therefore not subject
to these limitations on brokered deposits.
However, under the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief,
and Consumer Protection Act of 2018, which amended the FDIA, reciprocal
deposits are excluded from such limitations if the total reciprocal deposits of
the institution do not exceed 20% of its total liabilities. Reciprocal
deposits are deposits that banks make with each other in equal amounts.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, federal banking regulators
are required to establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements,
on a consolidated basis, for insured institutions, depository institution
holding companies, and non-bank financial companies supervised by the Federal
Reserve Board. The minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements are to
be determined based on the minimum ratios established for insured depository
institutions under prompt corrective action regulations. In effect, such
provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, which is commonly known as the Collins
Amendment, applies to bank holding companies the same leverage and risk-based
capital requirements that apply to insured depository institutions. Because the
capital requirements must be the same for insured depository institutions and
their holding companies, the Collins Amendment generally excludes certain debt
or equity instruments, such as cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust
preferred securities, from Tier 1 Capital, subject to a three-year phase-out
from Tier 1 qualification for such instruments issued before May 19, 2010,
which phase-out commenced on January 1, 2014 for advanced approaches
banking organizations and January 1, 2015 for other bank holding companies with
consolidated assets of $15 billion or more as of December 31, 2009. However,
such instruments issued before May 19, 2010 by a bank holding company,
such as Oriental, with total consolidated assets of less than $15 billion as of
December 31, 2009, are not affected by the Collins Amendments, are “grandfathered”
under the new capital rules, and may continue to be included in tier 1 Capital
as a restricted core capital element.
The Basel III capital rules adopted by the federal
banking agencies revise the agencies’ risk-based and leverage capital requirements
for banking organizations and consolidate three separate notices of proposed
rulemaking that the OCC, Federal Reserve Board and FDIC published in the
Federal Register on August 30, 2012, with selected changes. In particular, and
consistent with the Basel III framework, the capital rules include a minimum
ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5% and a
common equity tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted
assets that apply to all banking organizations. The rules also raise the
minimum ratio of tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4% to 6% and
include a minimum leverage ratio of 4% for all banking organizations. In
addition, for the largest, most internationally active banking organizations, the
rules include a new minimum supplementary leverage ratio that takes into
account off-balance sheet exposures. The rules incorporate these new
requirements into the agencies’ prompt corrective action framework. In
addition, the rules establish limits on a banking organization’s capital
distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking
organization does not hold a specified amount of common equity tier 1 capital
in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital
requirements. Further, the rules amend the methodologies for determining
risk-weighted assets for all banking organizations; introduce disclosure
requirements that would apply to top-tier banking organizations domiciled in
the United States with $50 billion or more in total assets; and adopt changes
to the agencies’ regulatory capital requirements that meet the requirements of
Section 171 and Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act. These rules also codify
the agencies’ capital rules, which have previously resided in various
appendices to their respective regulations, into a harmonized integrated
regulatory framework.
Under the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and
Consumer Protection Act of 2018, federal banking agencies must develop a
Community Bank Leverage Ratio (i.e., the ratio of a bank’s equity capital to
its average total consolidated assets) for banks with assets of less than $10
billion. Such banks that exceed this ratio will generally be deemed to in
compliance with all other capital and leverage requirements. On November 21,
2018, the federal banking agencies issued a proposal to simplify regulatory
capital requirements for qualifying community banking organizations, as
required by this law.
Failure to meet the capital rules could subject an institution
to a variety of enforcement actions including the termination of deposit
insurance by the FDIC and to certain restrictions on its business. At December
31, 2018, Oriental was in compliance with all applicable capital requirements.
For more information, please refer to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
Safety and Soundness Standards
Section 39 of the FDIA, as amended by FDICIA,
requires each federal banking agency to prescribe for all insured depository
institutions standards relating to internal control, information systems, and
internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit
underwriting,
interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, and such
other operational and managerial standards as the agency deems appropriate. In
addition, each federal banking agency is also required to adopt for all insured
depository institutions standards relating to asset quality, earnings and stock
valuation that the agency determines to be appropriate. Finally, each federal
banking agency is required to prescribe standards for the employment contracts
and other compensation arrangements of executive officers, employees, directors
and principal stockholders of insured depository institutions that would
prohibit compensation, benefits and other arrangements that are excessive or
that could lead to a material financial loss for the institution. If an
institution fails to meet any of the standards described above, it will be
required to submit to the appropriate federal banking agency a plan specifying
the steps that will be taken to cure the deficiency. If the institution fails
to submit an acceptable plan or fails to implement the plan, the appropriate
federal banking agency will require the institution to correct the deficiency
and, until it is corrected, may impose other restrictions on the institution,
including any of the restrictions applicable under the prompt corrective action
provisions of FDICIA.
The FDIC and the other federal banking agencies have
adopted Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness
that, among other things, set forth standards relating to internal controls,
information systems and internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit,
underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and employee compensation.
Activities and Investments of Insured State-Chartered
Banks
Section 24 of the FDIA, as amended by FDICIA,
generally limits the activities and equity investments of FDIC-insured,
state-chartered banks to those that are permissible for national banks. Under
FDIC regulations of equity investments, an insured state bank generally may not
directly or indirectly acquire or retain any equity investment of a type, or in
an amount, that is not permissible for a national bank. An insured state bank,
such as the Bank, is not prohibited from, among other things,
(i) acquiring or retaining a majority interest in a subsidiary engaged in
permissible activities, (ii) investing as a limited partner in a
partnership, or as a non-controlling interest holder of a limited liability
company, the sole purpose of which is direct or indirect investment in the
acquisition, rehabilitation or new construction of a qualified housing project,
provided that such investments may not exceed 2% of the bank’s total assets,
(iii) acquiring up to 10% of the voting stock of a company that solely
provides or reinsures directors’, trustees’ and officers’ liability insurance
coverage or bankers’ blanket bond group insurance coverage for insured depository
institutions, and (iv) acquiring or retaining the voting stock of an
insured depository institution if certain requirements are met, including that
it is owned exclusively by other banks. Under the FDIC regulations governing
the activities and investments of insured state banks which further implemented
Section 24 of the FDIA, as amended by FDICIA, an insured state-chartered
bank may not, directly, or indirectly through a subsidiary, engage as
“principal” in any activity that is not permissible for a national bank unless
the FDIC has determined that such activities would pose no risk to the Deposit
Insurance Fund and the bank is in compliance with applicable regulatory capital
requirements.
Transactions with Affiliates and Related Parties
Transactions between the Bank and any of its
affiliates are governed by sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve
Act. These sections are important statutory provisions designed to protect a
depository institution from transferring to its affiliates the subsidy arising
from the institution’s access to the Federal safety net. An affiliate of a bank
is any company or entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with the bank, including investment funds for which the bank or any of
its affiliates is an investment advisor. Generally, sections 23A and 23B
(i) limit the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in
“covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of the
bank’s capital stock and surplus, and limit such transactions with all
affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such capital stock and surplus, and
(ii) require that all such transactions be on terms that are consistent
with safe and sound banking practices. The term “covered transactions” includes
the making of loans, purchase of or investment in securities issued by the
affiliate, purchase of assets, acceptance of securities issued by the affiliate
as collateral for a loan or extension of credit, issuance of guarantees and
other similar types of transactions. The Dodd-Frank Act expanded the scope of
transactions treated as “covered transactions” to include credit exposure to an
affiliate on derivatives transactions, credit exposure resulting from a
securities borrowing or lending transaction, or derivative transaction, and
acceptances of affiliate-issued debt obligations as collateral for a loan or
extension of credit. Most loans by a bank to any of its affiliates must be
secured by collateral in amounts ranging from 100% to 130% of the loan
amount, depending on the nature of the collateral. In addition, any covered
transaction by a bank with an affiliate and any sale of assets or provision of
services to an affiliate must be on terms that are substantially the same, or
at least as favorable to the bank, as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies. Regulation W of the
Federal Reserve Board comprehensively implements sections 23A and 23B. The
regulation unified and updated staff interpretations issued over the years prior
to its adoption, incorporated several interpretative proposals (such as to
clarify when transactions with an unrelated third party will be attributed to
an affiliate), and addressed issues arising as a result of the expanded scope
of non-banking
activities engaged in by banks and bank
holding companies and authorized for financial holding companies under the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal
Reserve Act place restrictions on loans by a bank to executive officers, directors,
and principal shareholders. Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Board
implements these provisions. Under Section 22(h) and Regulation O,
loans to a director, an executive officer and a greater-than-10% shareholder of
a bank and certain of their related interests (collectively “insiders”), and
insiders of its affiliates, may not exceed, together with all other outstanding
loans to such person and its related interests, the bank’s single borrower
limit (generally equal to 15% of the institution’s unimpaired capital and
surplus). Section 22(h) and Regulation O also require that loans to
insiders and insiders of affiliates be made on terms substantially the same as
offered in comparable transactions to other persons, unless the loans are made
pursuant to a benefit or compensation program that (i) is widely available
to employees of the bank and (ii) does not give preference to insiders
over other employees of the bank. Section 22(h) and Regulation O also
require prior board of directors’ approval for certain loans, and the aggregate
amount of extensions of credit by a bank to all insiders cannot exceed the
institution’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Furthermore, Section 22(g)
and Regulation O place additional restrictions on loans to executive
officers.
Community Reinvestment Act
Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), a
financial institution has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent
with its safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of its entire
community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not
establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions
nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products
and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community,
consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires federal examiners, in connection with
the examination of a financial institution, to assess the institution’s record
of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into
account in its evaluation of certain applications by such institution. The CRA
also requires all institutions to make public disclosure of their CRA ratings.
Oriental has a Compliance Department that oversees the planning of products and
services offered to the community, especially those aimed to serve low and
moderate income communities.
USA Patriot Act
Under Title III of the USA Patriot Act, also
known as the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorism
Financing Act of 2001, all financial institutions, including Oriental, Oriental
Financial Services, and the Bank, are required in general to identify their
customers, adopt formal and comprehensive anti-money laundering programs,
scrutinize or prohibit altogether certain transactions of special concern, and
be prepared to respond to inquiries from U.S. law enforcement agencies
concerning their customers and their transactions.
The U.S. Treasury Department (the “US Treasury”)
has issued a number of regulations implementing the USA Patriot Act that apply
certain of its requirements to financial institutions. The regulations impose
obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies,
procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and
terrorist financing.
Failure of a financial institution to comply with the
USA Patriot Act’s requirements could have serious legal consequences for the
institution. Oriental and its subsidiaries, including the Bank, have adopted
policies, procedures and controls to address compliance with the USA Patriot
Act under existing regulations, and will continue to revise and update their
policies, procedures and controls to reflect changes required by the USA
Patriot Act and the US Treasury’s regulations.
Privacy Policies
Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, all financial
institutions are required to adopt privacy policies, restrict the sharing of
nonpublic customer data with nonaffiliated parties at the customer’s request,
and establish procedures and practices to protect customer data from
unauthorized access. Oriental and its subsidiaries have established policies
and procedures to assure Oriental’s compliance with all privacy provisions of
the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) implemented a
range of corporate governance and accounting measures to increase corporate
responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing
improprieties at publicly traded companies, and to protect investors by
improving the accuracy and reliability of disclosures under federal securities
laws. In addition, SOX established
membership
requirements and responsibilities for the audit committee, imposed restrictions
on the relationship between Oriental and external auditors, imposed additional
responsibilities for the external financial statements on the chief executive
officer and the chief financial officer, expanded the disclosure requirements
for corporate insiders, required management to evaluate its disclosure controls
and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting, and required
the auditors to issue a report on the internal control over financial
reporting.
Oriental has included in this annual report on
Form 10-K management’s assessment regarding the effectiveness of
Oriental’s internal control over financial reporting. The internal control
report includes a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Oriental;
management’s assessment as to the effectiveness of Oriental’s internal control
over financial reporting based on management’s evaluation as of year-end; and
the framework used by management as criteria for evaluating the effectiveness
of Oriental’s internal control over financial reporting. As of December 31,
2018 Oriental’s management concluded that its internal control over financial
reporting was effective.
Puerto Rico Banking Act
As a Puerto Rico-chartered commercial bank, the Bank
is subject to regulation and supervision by the OCFI under the Banking Act,
which contains provisions governing the organization of the Bank, rights and
responsibilities of directors, officers and stockholders, as well as the corporate
powers, savings, lending, capital and investment requirements and other aspects
of the Bank and its affairs. In addition, the OCFI is given extensive
rulemaking power and administrative discretion under the Banking Act. The OCFI
generally examines the Bank at least once every year.
The Banking Act requires that a minimum of 10% of the
Bank’s net income for the year be transferred to a reserve fund until such fund
(legal surplus) equals the total paid-in capital on common and preferred stock.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, legal surplus amounted to $90.2 million and
$81.5 million, respectively. The amount transferred to the legal surplus
account is not available for the payment of dividends to shareholders.
The Banking Act also provides that when the
expenditures of a bank are greater than the receipts, the excess of the former
over the latter must be charged against the undistributed profits of the bank,
and the balance, if any, must be charged against the reserve fund. If there is
no reserve fund sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the
outstanding amount must be charged against the capital account and no dividend
may be declared until said capital has been restored to its original amount and
the reserve fund to 20% of the original capital.
The Banking Act further requires every bank to
maintain a legal reserve which cannot be less than 20% of its demand
liabilities, except government deposits (federal, commonwealth and municipal),
which are secured by actual collateral.
The Banking Act also requires change of control
filings. When any person or entity will own, directly or indirectly, upon
consummation of a transfer, 5% or more of the outstanding voting capital stock
of a bank, the acquiring parties must inform the OCFI of the details not less
than 60 days prior to the date said transfer is to be consummated. The
transfer will require the approval of the OCFI if it results in a change of
control of the bank. Under the Banking Act, a change of control is presumed if
an acquirer who did not own more than 5% of the voting capital stock before the
transfer exceeds such percentage after the transfer.
The Banking Act permits Puerto Rico commercial banks
to make loans to any one person, firm, partnership or corporation, up to an aggregate
amount of 15% of the sum of: (i) the bank’s paid-in capital; (ii) the
bank’s reserve fund; (iii) 50% of the bank’s retained earnings, subject to
certain limitations; and (iv) any other components that the OCFI may
determine from time to time. If such loans are secured by collateral worth at
least 25% more than the amount of the loan, the aggregate maximum amount will
include 33.33% of 50% of the bank’s retained earnings. Such restrictions under
the Banking Act on the amount of loans to a single borrower do not apply to
loans: (i) to the government of the United States or the government of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any of their respective agencies,
instrumentalities or municipalities, or (ii) that are wholly secured by bonds,
securities and other evidence of indebtedness of the government of the United
States or of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or by bonds, not in default, of
municipalities or instrumentalities of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
The Puerto Rico Finance Board is composed of the
Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico; the Executive Director
of the Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Finance Advisory Authority: the Presidents
of the Economic Development Bank for Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Planning
Board; the Secretaries of Commerce and Economic Development, Treasury and
Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico; the Commissioner of Insurance of Puerto Rico;
and the President of the Public Corporation for Insurance and Supervision of
Puerto Rico Cooperatives. It has the authority to regulate the maximum interest
rates and finance charges that may be
charged on loans
to individuals and businesses in the Commonwealth. The current regulations of
the Puerto Rico Finance Board provide that the applicable interest rate on
loans to individuals and businesses is to be determined by free competition.
The Puerto Rico Finance Board also has the authority to regulate maximum
finance charges on retail installment sales contracts and for credit card
purchases. There is presently no maximum rate for retail installment sales
contracts and for credit card purchases.
Puerto Rico Internal
Revenue Code
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue
Code of 2011, as amended (the "PR Code”), a corporation pays taxes at a
fixed rate of 18.5% (the regular corporate tax) plus a surtax that ranges from
5% for net income subject to surtax in excess of $75,000 to 19% for net income
subject to surtax in excess of $275,000. Net income subject to surtax is net
income less $25,000. The maximum regular corporate tax decreased to 18.5% for tax
years beginning after December 31, 2018. The result is a maximum combined
rate of 37.5% (previously the maximum combined rate was 39%) under the PR Code for
years beginning after December 31, 2018. The Bank and other subsidiaries
of Oriental are treated as separate taxable corporations and are not entitled
to file consolidated returns. The PR Code also provides a
dividends-received deduction of 100% on dividends received from
"controlled subsidiaries" subject to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85%
on dividends received from other taxable domestic
corporations.
Act No. 77 of 2014 amended the PR Code to
increase the Puerto Rico capital gains tax rate from 15% to 20%, and for an
asset to be considered long term capital asset, the holding period must be over
a year, which before the enactment of this law was defined as having a holding
period of over six months. The PR Code was also amended by Act No. 72 of 2015.
The most relevant provisions of the Act 72, as applicable to Oriental, for
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014, are as follows: (i) a new
definition of “large taxpayers,” which require them to file their tax return
following a special procedure established by the Secretary of the Treasury of
Puerto Rico, (ii) net operating losses carried forward may be deducted up to
70% of the alternative minimum net income for purposes of computing the
alternative minimum tax, and (iii) net operating losses carried forward may be
deducted up to 80% of the net income for purposes of computing the regular
corporate income tax. Other amendments to the PR Code, for example, include an
increase of the sales and use tax ("SUT") from 7% to 11.5%, effective
July 1, 2015, and a special 4% SUT for certain business services previously
exempted from the SUT, effective October 1, 2015. On December 2018, the Puerto
Rico government enacted Act 257-2018 which, among other changes, (i) reduced
the maximum corporate income tax rate to 37.5%, from 39%, (ii) increased the
net operating losses deduction and carry forward deduction to 90% of taxable
income, previously 80%, (iii) included a restriction of the use of partnership
gains to offset current and accumulated operating losses generated by a
corporate partner, (iv) required that the corporate income tax returns of
“large taxpayers” be certified as prepared or reviewed by a Puerto Rico
licensed certified public accountant, (v) increased the limitation on the
partnership or special partnership loss deduction to 90% (from 80%) of the
aggregate net income of partnerships or special partnerships, (vi) increased
the limitation of capital losses carryover to 90% (previously 80%) of capital
gains for the taxable year, and (vii) amended the formula to compute the alternative
minimum tax (“AMT”), which now would be the greater of $500 or 23% of the AMT
taxable income (previously 30%).
International
Banking Center Regulatory Act of Puerto Rico
The business and operations of the Bank’s IBE Unit and
IBE Subsidiary are subject to supervision and regulation by the OCFI. Under the
IBE Act, no sale, encumbrance, assignment, merger, exchange or transfer of
shares, interest or participation in the capital of an IBE may be initiated
without the prior approval of the OCFI if by such transaction a person would
acquire, directly or indirectly, control of 10% or more of any class of stock,
interest or participation in the capital of the IBE. The IBE Act and the
regulations issued thereunder by the OCFI (the “IBE Regulations”) limit the
business activities that may be carried out by an IBE. Such activities are generally
limited to persons and assets/liabilities located outside of Puerto Rico. The
IBE Act provides further that every IBE must have not less than $300 thousand
of unencumbered assets or acceptable financial guarantees in Puerto Rico.
Pursuant to the IBE Act and the IBE Regulations, the
Bank’s IBE Unit and IBE Subsidiary have to maintain in Puerto Rico the books
and records of all their transactions in the ordinary course of business. They
are also required to submit quarterly and annual reports of their financial
condition and results of operations to the OCFI, including annual audited
financial statements.
The IBE Act empowers the OCFI to revoke or suspend,
after notice and hearing, a license issued thereunder if, among other things,
the IBE fails to comply with the IBE Act, the IBE Regulations or the terms of
its license, or if the OCFI finds that the business or affairs of the IBE are
conducted in a manner that is not consistent with the public interest.
In 2012, the IBE Act was superseded by a new law that,
among other things, prohibits new license applications to organize and operate
an IBE. Any such newly organized entity (now called an “international
financial entity”) must be licensed under the new law,
and
such entity (as opposed to existing IBEs organized under the IBE Act, including
the Bank’s IBE Unit and IBE Subsidiary, which are “grandfathered”) will
generally be subject to a 4% Puerto Rico income tax rate.
Volcker
Rule
The so-called “Volcker Rule” adopted by the federal
banking regulatory agencies under Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act generally
prohibits bank holding companies, insured depository institutions and their
affiliates from (i) engaging in short-term proprietary trading of securities,
derivatives, commodities futures and options on these instruments for their own
account; and (ii) owning, sponsoring or having certain relationships with hedge
funds or private equity funds. However, it exempts certain activities,
including market making, underwriting, hedging, trading in government and
municipal obligations, and organizing and offering a hedge fund or private
equity fund, among others. A banking entity that engages in any such covered
activity (i.e., proprietary trading or investment activities in hedge funds or
private equity funds) is generally required to establish an internal compliance
program reasonably designed to ensure and monitor compliance with the Volcker
Rule.
The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer
Protection Act of 2018 amended the BHC Act to exempt from the Volcker Rule
those bank holding companies, insured depository institutions and their
affiliates with total assets that do not exceed $10 billion and trading assets
and liabilities comprising not more than 5% of their total assets. Therefore,
banking entities that meet such threshold may generally engage in proprietary
trading and invest in private equity and hedge funds. On December 21, 2018,
the federal banking agencies proposed rules to implement such exemption.
Employees
At December 31, 2018, Oriental had
1,392 employees. None of its employees is represented by a collective
bargaining group. Oriental considers its employee relations to be good.
Internet Access to Reports
Oriental’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any and all
amendments to such reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are available free of charge
on or through the “SEC filings” link of Oriental’s internet website at www.ofgbancorp.com,
as soon as reasonably practicable after Oriental electronically files such
material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC.
Oriental’s
corporate governance principles and guidelines, code of business conduct and
ethics, and the charters of its audit committee, compensation committee, risk
and compliance committee, and corporate governance and nominating committee are
available free of charge on Oriental’s website at www.ofgbancorp.com under the
corporate governance link. Oriental’s code of business conduct and ethics
applies to its directors, officers, employees and agents, including its
principal executive, financial and accounting officers.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to other information set
forth in this report, you should carefully consider the following risk factors,
as updated by other filings Oriental makes with the SEC under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to
us at this time or that Oriental currently deems immaterial may also adversely
affect Oriental’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
ECONOMIC AND MARKET CONDITIONS RISK
Most of our business is conducted
in Puerto Rico, which economic and government fiscal and liquidity challenges,
as well as the impact of two major hurricanes during 2017, have adversely
impacted and may continue to adversely impact us.
Our loan and deposit activities are
directly affected by economic conditions within Puerto Rico. Because a
significant portion of our credit risk exposure on our loan portfolio, which is
the largest component of our interest-earning assets, is concentrated in Puerto
Rico, our profitability and financial condition may be adversely affected by an
extended economic recession, adverse political, fiscal or economic developments
in Puerto Rico, or the effects of a natural disaster, all of which could result
in a reduction in loan originations, an increase in non-performing assets, an
increase in foreclosure losses on mortgage loans, and a reduction in the value
of our loans and loan servicing portfolio.
Puerto Rico
entered recession in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 and its gross
national product (GNP) thereafter contracted in real terms every year between
fiscal years 2007 and 2017 (inclusive), except fiscal year 2012. Real GNP is
projected to have further contracted by approximately 5.6% in fiscal year 2018
according to the latest Puerto Rico Planning Board (the “Planning Board”)
estimates, exacerbated by the impact of hurricanes Irma and María in September
2017. The Planning Board estimates a 3.5% increase in GNP in fiscal year 2019,
in part due to the influx of federal funds and private insurance payments
following the impact of the hurricanes. Hurricane Irma and Maria caused
extensive destruction in Puerto Rico, disrupting the primary market in which
Oriental does business. The damage caused by the hurricanes was substantial and
had a material adverse impact on economic activity in Puerto Rico.
The
Commonwealth’s fiscal and economic crisis prompted the U.S. Congress to enact
the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) in
June 2016. PROMESA, among other things, established a seven-member
federally-appointed oversight board (the “Oversight Board”) with broad powers
over the finances of the Commonwealth and its instrumentalities and provided to
the Commonwealth, its public corporations and municipalities, broad-based
restructuring authority, including through a bankruptcy-type process similar to
that of Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In August 2016, President Obama
appointed the seven voting members of the Oversight Board through the process
established in PROMESA, which authorized the President to select the members
from several lists required to be submitted by congressional leaders. On
February 15, 2019, however, the First Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals
(the “First Circuit”) declared such appointments unconstitutional on the
grounds that they did not comply with the Appointments Clause of the U.S.
Constitution, which requires that principal federal officers be appointed by
the President, with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate. The First
Circuit’s decision provides that its mandate will not issue for 90 days, so as
to allow the President and the U.S. Senate to validate the currently defective
appointments or reconstitute the Oversight Board in accordance with the
Appointments Clause. Such process may delay the Commonwealth’s efforts to
restructure its debts and create additional uncertainty regarding the
Commonwealth’s prospects for fiscal and economic recovery.
Deterioration in local economic
conditions or in the financial condition of an industry on which the local
market depends could adversely affect factors such as unemployment rates and
real estate vacancy and values. This could result in, among other things, a
reduction of creditworthy borrowers seeking loans, an increase in loan
delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures, an increase in classified and
non-accrual loans, a decrease in the value of collateral for loans, and a
decrease in core deposits. Any of these factors could materially impact our
business.
For a discussion of the impact of the
economy on our loan portfolios, see “—A continuing decline in the real estate
market would likely result in an increase in delinquencies, defaults and
foreclosures and in a reduction in loan origination activity, which would
adversely affect our financial results.”
Puerto Rico
is susceptible to hurricanes and major storms, which could further deteriorate
Puerto Rico’s economy and infrastructure.
Our branch network and most of our business is concentrated in Puerto
Rico, which is susceptible to hurricanes and major storms that affect the local
economy and the demand for our loans and financial services, as well as the
ability of our customers to repay their loans. Any such natural disasters may
further adversely affect Puerto Rico’s critical infrastructure, which is
generally weak. This makes us vulnerable to downturns in Puerto Rico’s economy
as a result of natural disasters, such as hurricanes Irma and Maria. Any
subsequent hurricanes, major storms or similar natural disasters could further
deteriorate Puerto Rico’s economy and infrastructure and negatively affect or
disrupt our operations and customer base.
Changes in interest
rates could reduce Oriental’s net interest income
Market risk refers to the
probability of variations in the net interest income or the fair value of
assets and liabilities due to changes in interest rates, currency exchange
rates or equity prices.
Changes in interest rates are one of the
principal market risks affecting us. Our earnings are dependent to a large
degree on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest
rates earned on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment
securities, and the interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such
as deposits and borrowings. Depending on the duration and repricing
characteristics of the assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, changes
in interest rates could either increase or decrease the level of net interest
income. For any given period, the pricing structure of the assets and
liabilities is matched when an equal amount of such assets and liabilities
mature or reprice in that period. Like all financial institutions, our
financial position is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. Volatility
in interest rates can also result in the flow of funds away from financial
institutions. We may suffer losses or experience lower spreads than anticipated
if we are not effective in managing our interest rate risk.
CREDIT RISK
We are exposed to credit risk in
connection with our loans to certain municipalities of Puerto Rico, and the
restructuring of the government could adversely affect the value of such loans.
At December 31, 2018, we had
approximately $135.9 million of credit exposure to four Puerto Rico
municipalities. This credit exposure consists of collateralized loans or
obligations that have special additional property tax revenues pledged for
their repayment.
The Puerto Rico government faces a
number of severe economic and fiscal challenges that are expected to require a
significant government restructuring, as well as severe austerity measures to
close its significant budget deficit.
If the government restructuring affects
the ability of the municipalities to pay their obligations to us as they become
due, or under certain other circumstances, we may be required to adversely
classify such loans and increase the provision for loan losses in connection
therewith. Such provision may significantly impact our earnings.
Heightened credit risk could
require us to increase our provision for credit losses, which could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Making loans is an essential element of our business,
and there is a risk that the loans will not be repaid. This default risk is
affected by a number of factors, including:
·
the duration of the loan;
·
credit risks of a particular
borrower;
·
changes in economic or industry
conditions; and
·
in the case of a collateralized
loan, risks resulting from uncertainties about the future value of the
collateral.
Our customers might
not repay their loans according to the original terms, and the collateral
securing the payment of those loans might be insufficient to pay any remaining
loan balance. Hence, we may experience significant loan losses, which could
have a materially adverse effect on our operating results. We make various
assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio,
including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real
estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of loans. In
determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, we rely on loan
quality reviews, past loss experience, and an evaluation of economic conditions,
among other factors. If our assumptions prove to be incorrect, our allowance
for loan losses may not be enough to cover losses inherent in our loan
portfolio, resulting in additions to the allowance. Material additions to the
allowance would materially decrease our net income.
Our emphasis on the
origination of business and retail loans is one of the more significant factors
in evaluating our allowance for loan losses. As we continue to increase the
amount of these loans, additional or increased provisions for credit losses may
be necessary and as a result would decrease our earnings.
We strive to maintain an appropriate allowance for
loan and lease losses to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. We periodically determine the amount of the allowance based on
consideration of several factors such as default frequency, internal risk
ratings, expected future cash collections, loss recovery rates and general
economic factors, among others. Our methodology for measuring the adequacy of
the allowance relies on several key elements, which include a specific
allowance for identified problem loans and a general systematic allowance.
We believe our allowance for loan and lease losses is
currently sufficient given the constant monitoring of the risk inherent in the
loan portfolio. However, there is no precise method of predicting loan losses
and therefore we always face the risk that charge-offs in future periods will
exceed the allowance for loan and lease losses and that additional increases in
the allowance for loan and lease losses will be required. In addition, the FDIC
as well as the OCFI may require us to establish additional reserves. Additions
to the allowance for loan and lease losses would result in a decrease of net
earnings and capital and could hinder our ability to pay dividends.
Given the economic conditions in Puerto
Rico, we may continue to experience increased credit costs or need to take
greater than anticipated markdowns and make greater than anticipated provisions
to increase the allowances for loan losses that could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations in the future.
Bank regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and
may require us to increase our provision for credit losses or loan
charge-offs. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs
as required by these regulatory authorities could have a materially adverse
effect on our results of operations and/or financial condition.
We are subject to default and other risks in
connection with mortgage loan originations.
From the time that we fund the mortgage loans
originated to the time that they are sold, we are generally at risk for any
mortgage loan defaults. Once we sell the mortgage loans, the risk of loss from
mortgage loan defaults and foreclosures passes to the purchaser or insurer of
the mortgage loans. However, in the ordinary course of business, we make
representations and warranties to the purchasers and insurers of mortgage loans
relating to the validity of such loans. If there is a breach of any of these
representations or warranties, we may be required to repurchase the mortgage
loan and bear any subsequent loss on the mortgage loan. We also may be required
to repurchase mortgage loans in the event that there was improper underwriting
or fraud or in the event that the loans become delinquent shortly after they
are originated. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we repurchased $7.7
million of loans from GNMA and FNMA. Any such repurchases in the future may
negatively impact our liquidity and operating results. Termination of our
ability to sell mortgage products to U.S government-sponsored entities would
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition. In addition, we may be required to indemnify certain purchasers and
others against losses they incur in the event of breaches of our
representations and warranties and in various other circumstances, including
securities fraud claims, and the amount of such losses could exceed the
purchase amount of the related loans. Consequently, we may be exposed to credit
risk associated with sold loans. In addition, we incur higher liquidity risk
with respect to mortgage loans not eligible to be purchased or insured by FNMA,
GNMA or FHLMC, due to a lack of secondary market in which to sell these loans.
We have established reserves in our consolidated
financial statements for potential losses that are considered to be both
probable and reasonably estimable related to the mortgage loans sold by us. The
adequacy of the reserve and the ultimate amount of losses incurred will depend
on, among other things, the actual future mortgage loan performance, the actual
level of future repurchase and indemnification requests, the actual success
rate of claimants, developments in litigation related to us and the industry,
actual recoveries on the collateral and macroeconomic conditions (including
unemployment levels and housing prices). Due to uncertainties relating to these
factors, there can be no assurance that our reserves will be adequate or that
the total amount of losses incurred will not have a material adverse effect
upon our financial condition or results of operations. For additional
information related to our allowance for loan and lease losses, see “Note
7—Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” to our consolidated financial statements
included in this annual report on Form 10-K.
A continuing decline in the real estate market would
likely result in an increase in delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures and in
a reduction in loan origination activity, which would adversely affect our
financial results.
The residential mortgage loan origination business has
historically been cyclical, enjoying periods of strong growth and profitability
followed by periods of lower volumes and industry-wide losses. The market for
residential mortgage loan originations in Puerto Rico is currently in decline,
and this trend could also reduce the level of mortgage loans that we may
originate in the future and may adversely impact our business. During periods
of rising interest rates, refinancing originations for many mortgage products
tend to decrease as the economic incentives for borrowers to refinance their
existing mortgage loans are reduced. In addition, the residential mortgage loan
origination business is impacted by home values. A significant trend of
decreasing values in several housing segments in Puerto Rico continues to be
experienced. There is a risk that a reduction in housing values could
negatively impact our loss levels on the mortgage loan portfolio because the
value of the homes underlying the loans is a primary source of repayment in the
event of foreclosure.
The decline in Puerto Rico’s economy has
had an adverse effect in the credit quality of our loan portfolios. Among other
things, during the ongoing recession, we have experienced an increase in the
level of non-performing assets and loan loss provision, which adversely
affected our profitability. Although the delinquency rates have decreased
recently, due in part to our 2017 optional and temporary moratorium on most
retail loans and some commercial loan, they may increase if the recession
continues or worsens. If there is another decline in economic activity,
additional increases in the allowance for loan and lease losses could be
necessary with further adverse effects on our profitability.
Any sustained period of increased delinquencies,
foreclosures or losses could harm our ability to sell loans, the price received
on the sale of such loans, and the value of the mortgage loan portfolio, all of
which could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial
condition. In addition, any material decline in real estate values would weaken
our collateral loan-to-value ratios and increase the possibility of loss if a
borrower default. For a discussion of the impact of the Puerto Rico economy on
our business
operations, see “Most of our business is
conducted in Puerto Rico, which is experiencing a deep economic recession, a
downturn in the real estate market, and a government fiscal and liquidity
crisis.”
OPERATIONS AND BUSINESS RISK
Non-Compliance with USA Patriot Act, Bank Secrecy Act,
or other laws and regulations could result in fines and other sanctions.
Financial institutions are generally required under
the USA Patriot Act and the Bank Secrecy Act to develop programs to prevent
such financial institutions from being used for money-laundering and terrorist
financing activities. Financial institutions are generally also required to
file suspicious activity reports with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
of the U.S. Treasury Department if such activities are detected. These rules
also require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and
verifying the identity of customers seeking to open new financial accounts. We
have developed a compliance program reasonably designed to ensure compliance
with such laws and regulations. Our failure or the inability to comply with
these regulations could result in enforcement actions, fines or penalties,
curtailment of expansion opportunities, intervention or sanctions by
regulators, costly litigation, or expensive additional internal controls and
systems.
We are subject to security and
operational risks related to our use of technology, including the risk of
cyber-attack or cyber theft.
Our operations rely on the secure
processing, transmission and storage of confidential information in our
computer systems and networks regarding our customers and their accounts. To
provide these products and services, we use information systems and
infrastructure that we and third-party service providers operate. As a
financial institution, we also are subject to and examined for compliance with
an array of data protection laws, regulations and guidance, as well as to our
own internal privacy and information security policies and programs.
Such incidents may include unauthorized
access to our digital systems for purposes of misappropriation of assets,
gaining access to sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing
operational disruption. Although our information technology structure
continues to be subject to cyber attacks, we have not, to our knowledge,
experience a breach of cyber-security. Such an event could compromise our
confidential information, as well as that of our customers and third parties
with whom we interact with and may result in negative consequences.
While we have policies and procedures designated to
prevent or limit the effects of a possible security breach of our information
systems, if unauthorized persons were somehow to get access to confidential
information in our possession or to our proprietary information, it could
result in significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation or
a loss of confidence in the security of our systems that could adversely affect
our business. Though we have insurance against some cyber-risks and attacks, it
may not be sufficient to offset the impact of a material loss event.
We rely on third parties to
provide services and systems essential to the operation of our business, and
any failure, interruption or termination of such services or systems could have
a material adverse affect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our business relies on the secure,
successful and uninterrupted functioning of our core banking platform,
information technology, telecommunications, and loan servicing. We outsource
some of our major systems, such as customer data and deposit processing, part
of our mortgage loan servicing, internet and mobile banking, and electronic
fund transfer systems. The failure or interruption of such systems, or the
termination of a third-party software license or any service agreement on which
any of these systems or services is based, could interrupt our operations.
Because our information technology and telecommunications systems interface
with and depend on third-party systems, we could experience service denials if
demand for such services exceeds capacity or such systems fail or experience
interruptions. In addition, replacing third party service providers could also
entail significant delay and expense.
If sustained or repeated, a failure,
denial or termination of such systems or services could result in a
deterioration of our ability to process new loans, service existing loans,
gather deposits and/or provide customer service. It could also compromise our
ability to operate effectively, damage our reputation, result in a loss of
customer business and/or subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and
possible financial liability. Any of the foregoing could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our risk management
policies, procedures and systems may be inadequate to mitigate all risks
inherent in our various businesses.
A
comprehensive risk management function is essential to the financial and
operational success of our business. The types of risk we monitor and seek to
manage include, but are not limited to, operational, technological,
organizational, market, fiduciary, legal, compliance, liquidity and credit
risks. We have adopted various policies, procedures and systems to monitor and
manage these risks. There can be no assurance that those policies, procedures
and systems are adequate to identify and mitigate all risks inherent in our
various businesses. Our businesses and the markets in which we operate are also
continuously evolving. If we fail to fully understand the implications of
changes in our business or the financial markets and to adequately or timely
enhance the risk framework to address those changes, we could incur losses. In
addition, in a difficult or less liquid market environment, our risk management
strategies may not be effective because other market participants may be
attempting to use the same or similar strategies to deal with the challenging
market conditions. In such circumstances, it may be difficult for us to reduce
our risk positions due to the activity of such other market participants.
LIQUIDITY RISK
Our business could
be adversely affected if we cannot maintain access to stable funding sources.
Our business requires continuous access to various
funding sources. We are able to fund our operations through deposits as well as
through advances from the FHLB-NY and FRB-NY; however, our business is
significantly dependent upon other wholesale funding sources, such as
repurchase agreements and brokered deposits, which consisted of approximately
22% of our total interest-bearing liabilities as of December 31, 2018.
Brokered deposits are typically sold through an
intermediary to small retail investors. Our ability to continue to attract
brokered deposits is subject to variability based upon a number of factors,
including volume and volatility in the global securities markets, our credit
rating and the relative interest rates that we are prepared to pay for these
liabilities. Brokered deposits are generally considered a less stable source of
funding than core deposits obtained through retail bank branches. Investors in
brokered deposits are generally more sensitive to interest rates and will
generally move funds from one depository institution to another based on small
differences in interest rates offered on deposits.
We expect to have continued access to credit from the
foregoing sources of funds. However, there can be no assurance that such
financing sources will continue to be available or will be available on
favorable terms. In a period of financial disruption, or if negative
developments occur with respect to us, the availability and cost of funding
sources could be adversely affected. In that event, our cost of funds may
increase, thereby reducing the net interest income, or we may need to dispose
of a portion of the investment portfolio, which, depending upon market
conditions, could result in realizing a loss or experiencing other adverse accounting
consequences upon such dispositions. The interest rates that we pay on our
securities are also influenced by, among other things, applicable credit
ratings from recognized rating agencies. A downgrade to any of these credit
ratings could affect our ability to access the capital markets, increase our
borrowing costs and have a negative impact on our results of operations. Our
efforts to monitor and manage liquidity risk may not be successful to deal with
dramatic or unanticipated changes in the global securities markets or other
reductions in liquidity driven by us or market-related events. In the event
that such sources of funds are reduced or eliminated, and we are not able to
replace them on a cost-effective basis, we may be forced to curtail or cease
our loan origination business and treasury activities, which would have a
material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.
Our ability to receive dividends from our subsidiaries
could affect our liquidity and ability to pay dividends.
We
are a separate and distinct legal entity from our subsidiaries. Dividends to us
from our subsidiaries have represented a major source of funds for us to pay
dividends on our common and preferred stock, make payments on corporate debt
securities and meet other obligations. There are various U.S. federal and
Puerto Rico law limitations on the extent to which Oriental Bank, our main
subsidiary, can finance or otherwise supply funds to us through dividends and
loans. These limitations include minimum regulatory capital requirements, U.S.
federal and Puerto Rico banking law requirements concerning the payment of
dividends out of net profits or surplus, Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal
Reserve Act and Regulation W of the Federal Reserve Board governing transactions
between an insured depository institution and its affiliates, as well as
general federal regulatory oversight to prevent unsafe or unsound practices. Further, under the Basel III capital rules adopted by the
federal banking regulatory agencies, a banking organization will need to hold a
capital conservation buffer (composed of common equity tier 1 capital) greater
than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets to avoid limitations on capital
distributions and discretionary bonus payments. Compliance with the capital
conservation buffer is determined as of the end of the calendar quarter prior
to any such capital distribution or discretionary bonus payment and is subject
to a three-year transition period beginning in 2016.
If our subsidiaries’
earnings are not sufficient to make dividend payments while maintaining
adequate capital levels, our liquidity may be affected, and we may not be able
to make dividend payments to our holders of common and preferred stock or
payments on outstanding corporate debt securities or meet other obligations,
each of which could have a material adverse impact on our results of
operations, financial position or perception of financial health.
In addition, our right to participate in a
distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is
subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors.
COMPETITIVE AND STRATEGIC
RISK
Competition with other
financial institutions could adversely affect our profitability.
We face substantial competition
in originating loans and in attracting deposits and assets to manage. The
competition in originating loans and attracting assets comes principally from
other U.S., Puerto Rico and foreign banks, investment advisors, securities
broker-dealers, mortgage banking companies, consumer finance companies, credit
unions, insurance companies, and other institutional lenders and purchasers of
loans. We will encounter greater competition as we expand our operations.
Increased competition may require us to increase the rates paid on deposits or
lower the rates charged on loans which could adversely affect our
profitability.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and may
be adversely affected by changes in federal and local laws and regulations.
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation by
federal and local governmental authorities and are subject to various laws and
judicial and administrative decisions imposing requirements and restrictions on
all or part of our operations. Because our business is highly regulated, the
laws, rules and regulations applicable to us are subject to regular
modification and change. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act has a broad impact on
the financial services industry, including significant regulatory and
compliance changes, as discussed under the subheading “Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act” in Item 1of this annual report. The changes
resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the profitability of our business
activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, impose upon
us more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements or
otherwise adversely affect our business.
We may be required to invest significant management
attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes in order to
comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements. Failure to comply with
the new requirements may negatively impact our results of operations and
financial condition. While we cannot predict what effect any presently
contemplated or future changes in the laws or regulations or their
interpretations would have on us, these changes could be materially adverse to
our investors.
Competition in attracting talented people could
adversely affect our operations.
We depend on our ability to attract and retain key
personnel and we rely heavily on our management team. The inability to recruit
and retain key personnel or the unexpected loss of key managers may adversely
affect our operations. Our success to date has been influenced strongly by the
ability to attract and retain senior management experienced in banking and
financial services. Retention of senior managers and appropriate succession
planning will continue to be critical to the successful implementation of our
strategies.
Reputational risk and social factors may impact our
results.
Our ability to originate loans and to attract deposits
and assets is highly dependent upon the perceptions of consumer, commercial and
funding markets of our business practices and our financial health. Negative
public opinion could result from actual or alleged conduct in any number of
activities or circumstances, including lending practices, regulatory
compliance, inadequate protection of customer information, or sales and
marketing, and from actions taken by regulators in response to such conduct.
Adverse perceptions regarding us could lead to difficulties in originating
loans and generating and maintaining accounts as well as in financing them.
In addition, a variety of social factors may cause
changes in borrowing activity, including credit card use, payment patterns and
the rate of defaults by account holders and borrowers. If consumers develop or
maintain negative attitudes about incurring debt, or if consumption trends
decline, our business and financial results will be negatively affected.
ACCOUNTING AND
TAX RISK
Changes in
accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect our financial
statements.
Our financial statements are subject to the
application of GAAP, which are periodically revised and/or expanded.
Accordingly, from time to time we are required to adopt new or revised
accounting standards issued by FASB. Market conditions have prompted accounting
standard setters to promulgate new guidance which further interprets or seeks
to revise accounting pronouncements related to financial instruments,
structures or transactions as well as to issue new standards expanding
disclosures. See “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our
consolidated financial statements included herein for a discussion of any
accounting developments that have been issued but not yet implemented. An
assessment of proposed standards is not provided as such proposals are subject
to change through the exposure process and, therefore, the effects on our
consolidated financial statements cannot be meaningfully assessed. It is
possible that future accounting standards that we are required to adopt could
change the current accounting treatment that applies to the consolidated
financial statements and that such changes could have a material effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
Our goodwill
and other intangible assets could be determined to be impaired in the future
and could decrease Oriental’s earnings.
We are required to
test our goodwill, core deposit and customer relationship intangible assets for
impairment on a periodic basis. The impairment testing process considers a
variety of factors, including the current market price of our common shares,
the estimated net present value of our assets and liabilities, and information
concerning the terminal valuation of similarly situated insured depository
institutions. If an impairment determination is made in a future reporting
period, our earnings and the book value of these intangible assets will be
reduced by the amount of the impairment. If an impairment loss is recorded, it
will have little or no impact on the tangible book value of our common shares
or our regulatory capital levels, but such an impairment loss could
significantly restrict Oriental’s ability to make dividend payments without
prior regulatory approval.
Based on our annual
goodwill impairment test, we determined that no impairment charges were
necessary. As of December 31, 2018, we had on our consolidated balance sheet
$86.1 million of goodwill in connection with the BBVAPR Acquisition and
the FDIC-assisted Eurobank acquisition, $2.5 million of core deposit intangible
in connection with the FDIC-assisted Eurobank acquisition and the BBVAPR
Acquisition, and $0.9 million of customer relationship intangible in connection
with the BBVAPR Acquisition. There can be no assurance that future evaluations
of such goodwill or intangibles will not result in any impairment charges.
Among other factors, further declines in our common stock as a result of macroeconomic
conditions and the general weakness of the Puerto Rico economy, could lead to
an impairment of such assets. If such assets become impaired, it could have a
negative impact on our results of operations.
Legislative and other measures that may be taken by
Puerto Rico governmental authorities could materially increase our tax burden
or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
Legislative changes, particularly changes
in tax laws, could adversely impact our results of operations. In an
effort to address the Commonwealth’s ongoing fiscal problems, the Puerto Rico
government has enacted tax reforms in the past and is expected to do so in the
future. In 2014, the government of Puerto Rico approved an amendment to the PR
Code, which, among other things, changed the income tax rate for capital gains
from 15% to 20%. In May 2015, the government approved an increase in the Puerto
Rico sales and use tax, effective July 1, 2015, from 7% to 11.5%, included a
new 4% business to business tax and expanded the sales and use tax to certain
business services that were previously exempt. In addition, in December 2018,
the Puerto Rico government enacted Act 257-2018, which reduced the maximum
corporate income tax rate from 39% to 37.5% included a restriction on the use
of partnership gains to offset current and accumulated operating losses
generated by a corporate partner and amended the formula to compute the AMT,
among other changes, as described above under “Puerto Rico Internal Revenue
Code,” Item 1. The recent change in tax rate resulted in a reduction of our
deferred tax assets, with a corresponding non-cash increase to income tax
expense.
We operate the IBE Unit and IBE Subsidiary pursuant to
the IBE Act which provides significant tax advantages. The IBEs have an
exemption from Puerto Rico income taxes on interest earned on, or gain realized
from the sale of, non-Puerto Rico assets, including U.S. government
obligations and certain mortgage-backed securities. This exemption has allowed
us to have an effective tax rate below the maximum statutory tax rate. In the
past, the Legislature of Puerto Rico has considered proposals to curb the tax
benefits afforded to IBEs. In 2012, a new Puerto Rico law was enacted in this
area, although it did not repeal the IBE Act, the new law does not allow new
license applications under the IBE Act. Any newly organized “international
financial entity” must be licensed under a new law and such entity (as opposed
to existing IBEs organized under the IBE Act, including the Bank’s IBE Unit and
IBE Subsidiary, which are “grandfathered”) are generally subject to a 4% Puerto
Rico income tax rate. In the event other legislation is enacted by the Puerto
Rico government to eliminate or modify the tax exemption provided to IBEs, the
consequences could have a
materially adverse impact on
our financial results, including an increase in income tax expense and
consequently our effective tax rate, adversely affecting our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Oriental
owns a fifteen-story office building located at 254 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, San
Juan Puerto Rico, known as Oriental Center. Oriental operates a full-service
branch at the plaza level and our centralized units and subsidiaries occupy
approximately 84% of the office floor space. Approximately 3% of the office
space is leased to outside tenants and 13% is available for lease.
The
Bank owns five branch premises and leases thirty-two branch commercial offices
throughout Puerto Rico. The Bank’s management believes that each of its
facilities is well maintained and suitable for its purpose and can readily
obtain appropriate additional space as may be required at competitive rates by
extending expiring leases or finding alternative space.
At
December 31, 2018, the aggregate future rental commitments under the terms of
the leases, exclusive of taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses payable by
Oriental, was approximately $24.4 million.
Oriental’s
investment in premises and equipment, exclusive of leasehold improvements at
December 31, 2018, was $114.9 million, gross of accumulated depreciation.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Oriental and its
subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings incidental to
their business. Oriental is vigorously contesting such claims. Based upon a
review by legal counsel and the development of these matters to date,
management is of the opinion that the ultimate aggregate liability, if any,
resulting from these claims will not have a material adverse effect on
Oriental’s financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Oriental’s
common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol
“OFG”. Information concerning the range of high and low sales prices for Oriental’s
common stock for each quarter in the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, as
well as cash dividends declared for such periods is set forth under the
sub-heading “Stockholders’ Equity” in the “Analysis of Financial Condition”
caption in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations (“MD&A”).
Information
concerning legal or regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by
Oriental and the Bank is contained under the sub-heading “Dividend
Restrictions” in Item 1 of this annual report.
As of
December 31, 2018, Oriental had approximately 6,340 holders of record of its
common stock, including all directors and officers of Oriental, and beneficial
owners whose shares are held in “street” name by securities broker-dealers or
other nominees.
Stock Performance Graph
The
graph below compares the percentage change in Oriental’s cumulative total
stockholder return during the measurement period with the cumulative total
return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, of the Russell 2000 Index and the
SNL Bank Index.
The
cumulative total stockholder return was obtained by dividing (a) the sum of
(i) the cumulative amount of dividends per share, assuming dividend
reinvestment, for the measurement period beginning December 31, 2013, and
(ii) the difference between the share price at the beginning and the end
of the measurement period, by (b) the share price at the beginning of the
measurement period.
Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return
Assumes Initial Investment of $100
Index
|
12/31/2013
|
12/31/2014
|
12/31/2015
|
12/31/2016
|
12/31/2017
|
12/31/2018
|
OFG
Bancorp
|
100.00
|
97.98
|
44.47
|
81.72
|
60.09
|
107.12
|
Russell
2000
|
100.00
|
104.89
|
100.26
|
121.63
|
139.44
|
124.09
|
SNL
Bank
|
100.00
|
111.79
|
113.69
|
143.65
|
169.64
|
140.98
|
ITEM 6. SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The following
selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under
Item 7 and “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” under Item 8 of this annual
report.
OFG Bancorp
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018,
2017, 2016, 2015, AND 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
EARNINGS
DATA:
|
(In thousands, except per
share data)
|
Interest
income
|
$
|
360,419
|
|
$
|
345,647
|
|
$
|
356,592
|
|
$
|
406,568
|
|
$
|
485,257
|
Interest
expense
|
|
44,525
|
|
|
41,475
|
|
|
57,165
|
|
|
69,196
|
|
|
76,782
|
Net interest income
|
|
315,894
|
|
|
304,172
|
|
|
299,427
|
|
|
337,372
|
|
|
408,475
|
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
|
56,108
|
|
|
113,139
|
|
|
65,076
|
|
|
161,501
|
|
|
60,640
|
Net interest income after provision for loan and leases losses
|
|
259,786
|
|
|
191,033
|
|
|
234,351
|
|
|
175,871
|
|
|
347,835
|
Non-interest
income
|
|
80,095
|
|
|
78,687
|
|
|
66,819
|
|
|
52,472
|
|
|
17,323
|
Non-interest
expenses
|
|
207,081
|
|
|
201,631
|
|
|
215,990
|
|
|
248,401
|
|
|
242,725
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
132,800
|
|
|
68,089
|
|
|
85,180
|
|
|
(20,058)
|
|
|
122,433
|
Income
tax (benefit) expense
|
|
48,390
|
|
|
15,443
|
|
|
25,994
|
|
|
(17,554)
|
|
|
37,252
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
84,410
|
|
|
52,646
|
|
|
59,186
|
|
|
(2,504)
|
|
|
85,181
|
Less:
dividends on preferred stock
|
|
(12,024)
|
|
|
(13,862)
|
|
|
(13,862)
|
|
|
(13,862)
|
|
|
(13,862)
|
Income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
$
|
72,386
|
|
$
|
38,784
|
|
$
|
45,324
|
|
$
|
(16,366)
|
|
$
|
71,319
|
PER
SHARE DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
$
|
(0.37)
|
|
$
|
1.58
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
$
|
(0.37)
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
Average
common shares outstanding
|
|
45,400
|
|
|
43,939
|
|
|
43,913
|
|
|
51,455
|
|
|
45,024
|
Average
common shares outstanding and equivalents
|
|
51,349
|
|
|
51,096
|
|
|
51,088
|
|
|
44,231
|
|
|
52,326
|
Cash
dividends declared per common share
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
0.34
|
Cash
dividends declared on common shares
|
$
|
11,511
|
|
|
10,553
|
|
|
10,544
|
|
|
15,932
|
|
|
15,286
|
PERFORMANCE
RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return
on average assets (ROA)
|
|
1.31%
|
|
|
0.84%
|
|
|
0.88%
|
|
|
-0.03%
|
|
|
1.10%
|
Return
on average tangible common stockholders' equity
|
|
9.95%
|
|
|
5.64%
|
|
|
6.94%
|
|
|
-2.47%
|
|
|
10.91%
|
Return
on average common equity (ROE)
|
|
8.85%
|
|
|
4.98%
|
|
|
6.08%
|
|
|
-2.16%
|
|
|
9.50%
|
Equity-to-assets
ratio
|
|
15.19%
|
|
|
15.27%
|
|
|
14.16%
|
|
|
12.64%
|
|
|
12.65%
|
Efficiency
ratio
|
|
53.07%
|
|
|
53.99%
|
|
|
57.82%
|
|
|
60.00%
|
|
|
49.90%
|
Interest
rate spread
|
|
5.19%
|
|
|
5.15%
|
|
|
4.74%
|
|
|
4.95%
|
|
|
5.79%
|
Interest
rate margin
|
|
5.28%
|
|
|
5.23%
|
|
|
4.82%
|
|
|
5.03%
|
|
|
5.84%
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
PERIOD
END BALANCES AND CAPITAL RATIOS:
|
(In thousands, except per
share data)
|
Investments
and loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
$
|
1,279,604
|
|
$
|
1,166,050
|
|
$
|
1,362,511
|
|
$
|
1,615,872
|
|
$
|
1,402,056
|
Loans and leases, net
|
|
4,431,594
|
|
|
4,056,329
|
|
|
4,147,692
|
|
|
4,434,213
|
|
|
4,826,646
|
Total investments and loans
|
$
|
5,711,198
|
|
$
|
5,222,379
|
|
$
|
5,510,203
|
|
$
|
6,050,085
|
|
$
|
6,228,702
|
Deposits
and borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
$
|
4,908,115
|
|
$
|
4,799,482
|
|
$
|
4,664,487
|
|
$
|
4,717,751
|
|
$
|
4,924,406
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
455,508
|
|
|
192,869
|
|
|
653,756
|
|
|
934,691
|
|
|
980,087
|
Other borrowings
|
|
114,917
|
|
|
135,879
|
|
|
141,598
|
|
|
436,843
|
|
|
439,919
|
Total deposits and borrowings
|
$
|
5,478,540
|
|
$
|
5,128,230
|
|
$
|
5,459,841
|
|
$
|
6,089,285
|
|
$
|
6,344,412
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
$
|
92,000
|
|
$
|
176,000
|
|
$
|
176,000
|
|
$
|
176,000
|
|
$
|
176,000
|
Common stock
|
|
59,885
|
|
|
52,626
|
|
|
52,626
|
|
|
52,626
|
|
|
52,626
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
619,381
|
|
|
541,600
|
|
|
540,948
|
|
|
540,512
|
|
|
539,311
|
Legal surplus
|
|
90,167
|
|
|
81,454
|
|
|
76,293
|
|
|
70,435
|
|
|
70,435
|
Retained earnings
|
|
253,040
|
|
|
200,878
|
|
|
177,808
|
|
|
148,886
|
|
|
181,184
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
(103,633)
|
|
|
(104,502)
|
|
|
(104,860)
|
|
|
(105,379)
|
|
|
(97,070)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
(10,963)
|
|
|
(2,949)
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
13,997
|
|
|
19,711
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
$
|
999,877
|
|
$
|
945,107
|
|
$
|
920,411
|
|
$
|
897,077
|
|
$
|
942,197
|
Per
share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share
|
$
|
17.90
|
|
$
|
17.73
|
|
$
|
17.18
|
|
$
|
16.67
|
|
$
|
17.40
|
Tangible book value per common share
|
$
|
16.15
|
|
$
|
15.67
|
|
$
|
15.08
|
|
$
|
14.53
|
|
$
|
15.25
|
Market price at end of period
|
$
|
16.46
|
|
$
|
9.40
|
|
$
|
13.10
|
|
$
|
7.32
|
|
$
|
16.65
|
Capital
ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage capital
|
|
14.22%
|
|
|
13.92%
|
|
|
12.99%
|
|
|
11.18%
|
|
|
10.61%
|
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
11.88%
|
Common equity Tier 1 capital
|
|
16.78%
|
|
|
14.59%
|
|
|
14.05%
|
|
|
12.14%
|
|
|
N/A
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
|
|
19.20%
|
|
|
19.05%
|
|
|
18.35%
|
|
|
15.99%
|
|
|
16.02%
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
20.48%
|
|
|
20.34%
|
|
|
19.62%
|
|
|
17.29%
|
|
|
17.57%
|
Financial
assets managed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust assets managed
|
$
|
2,771,462
|
|
$
|
3,039,998
|
|
$
|
2,850,494
|
|
$
|
2,691,423
|
|
$
|
2,841,111
|
Broker-dealer assets gathered
|
|
2,116,035
|
|
|
2,250,460
|
|
|
2,350,718
|
|
|
2,374,709
|
|
|
2,622,001
|
Total
assets managed
|
$
|
4,887,497
|
|
$
|
5,290,458
|
|
$
|
5,201,212
|
|
$
|
5,066,132
|
|
$
|
5,463,112
|
The ratios shown below demonstrate Oriental’s
ability to generate sufficient earnings to pay the fixed charges or expenses of
its debt and preferred stock dividends. Oriental’s consolidated ratios of
earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends were computed
by dividing earnings by combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends,
as specified below, using two different assumptions, one excluding interest on
deposits and the second including interest on deposits:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Consolidated
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
|
|
Excluding interests on deposits
|
|
5.54
|
|
|
2.91x
|
|
|
2.60x
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
|
2.81x
|
Including interests on deposits
|
|
3.03x
|
|
|
1.92x
|
|
|
1.97x
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
|
2.16x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
In 2015, earnings were not sufficient to cover preferred stock dividends, and
the ratio was less than 1:1. The Company would have had to generate
additional earnings of $34 million to achieve a ratio of 1:1 in 2015.
|
For purposes of
computing these consolidated ratios, earnings represent income before income
taxes plus fixed charges and amortization of capitalized interest, less
interest capitalized. Fixed charges consist of interest expensed and
capitalized, amortization of debt issuance costs, and Oriental’s estimate of
the interest component of rental expense. The term “preferred stock dividends”
is the amount of pre-tax earnings that is required to pay dividends on
Oriental’s outstanding preferred stock. As of December 31, 2018, Oriental had
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock issued and outstanding amounting to $92.0 million,
as follows: (i) Series A amounting to $33.5 million or
1,340,000 shares at a $25 liquidation value; (ii) Series B
amounting to $34.5 million or 1,380,000 shares at a $25 liquidation
value; and (iii) Series D amounting to $24.0 million or
960,000 shares at a $25 liquidation value. As of December 31, 2017, 2016,
2015, and 2014, Oriental had non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock issued
and outstanding amounting to $176.0 million, which included $84.0 million or
84,000 shares of Series C at $1,000 liquidation value, which was converted on
October 22, 2018 by Oriental into common shares at a conversion rate of
86.4225.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2018
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The accounting and reporting policies followed by Oriental conform with
GAAP and general practices within the financial services industry. Oriental’s
significant accounting policies are described in detail in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with this
section.
Critical accounting policies require management to make estimates and
assumptions, which involve significant judgment about the effect of matters
that are inherently uncertain and that involve a high degree of subjectivity.
These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time and
changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that
differ from those estimates. The following MD&A section is a summary of
what management considers Oriental’s critical accounting policies and
estimates.
Fair
Value Measurement of Financial Instruments
Oriental currently measures at fair value on a
recurring basis its trading assets, available-for-sale securities, derivatives,
mortgage servicing rights and contingent consideration. Occasionally, Oriental
may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis,
such as loans held-for-sale, impaired loans held-in-portfolio that are
collateral dependent and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value
adjustments typically result from the application of lower of cost or fair
value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
Oriental categorizes its assets and liabilities
measured at fair value under the three-level hierarchy. The level within the
hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for
fair value measurement are observable.
Oriental requires the use
of observable inputs when available, in order to minimize the use of
unobservable inputs to determine fair value. The inputs or methodologies used
for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated
with investing in those securities. The amount of judgment involved in
estimating the fair value of a financial instrument depends upon the
availability of quoted market prices or observable market parameters. In
addition, it may be affected by other factors such as the type of instrument,
the liquidity of the market for the instrument, transparency around the inputs
to the valuation, as well as the contractual characteristics of the instrument.
If listed prices or quotes are not available, Oriental
employs valuation models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield
curves, interest rate curves, volatilities, credit curves, and discount,
prepayment and delinquency rates, among other considerations. When market
observable data is not available, the valuation of financial instruments
becomes more subjective and involves substantial judgment. The need to use
unobservable inputs generally results from diminished observability of both
actual trades and assumptions resulting from the lack of market liquidity for
those types of loans or securities. When fair values are estimated based on
modeling techniques such as discounted cash flow models, Oriental uses
assumptions such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss
severity rates and discount rates. Valuation adjustments are limited to those
necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value is adequately
representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace.
Management believes that fair values are reasonable
and consistent with the fair value measurement guidance based on Oriental’s
internal validation procedure and consistency of the processes followed, which
include obtaining market quotes when possible or using valuation techniques
that incorporate market-based inputs.
Refer to Note 27 to the consolidated financial
statements for information on Oriental’s fair value measurement disclosures
required by the applicable accounting standard. At December 31, 2018, 99%, of
the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis used market-based or
market-derived valuation methodology and, therefore, were classified as Level 1
or Level 2. Level 2 classified instruments consisted primarily of U.S. Treasury
securities, obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored entities, most
mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), and collateralized mortgage obligations
(“CMOs”), and derivative instruments.
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
The majority of the values for trading account securities and
investment securities available-for-sale are obtained from third-party pricing
services and are validated with alternate pricing sources when available.
Securities not priced by a secondary pricing source are documented and
validated internally according to their significance for Oriental’s financial
statements. Management has established materiality thresholds according to the
investment class to monitor and investigate material deviations in prices
obtained from the primary pricing service provider and the secondary pricing
source used as support for the valuation results. During the year ended
December 31, 2018, Oriental did not adjust any prices obtained from pricing
service providers.
Inputs are evaluated to ascertain that they consider current market
conditions, including the relative liquidity of the market. When a market quote
for a specific security is not available, the pricing service provider
generally uses observable data to derive an exit price for the instrument, such
as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To the extent
trading data is not available, the pricing service provider relies on specific
information including buy side clients, credit ratings, spreads to established
benchmarks and transactions on similar securities, to draw correlations based
on the characteristics of the evaluated instrument. If for any reason the
pricing service provider cannot observe data required to feed its model, it
discontinues pricing the instrument.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, none of Oriental’s investment
securities were subject to pricing discontinuance by the pricing service
providers. The pricing methodology and approach of our primary pricing service
providers is concluded to be consistent with the fair value measurement
guidance.
Furthermore, management assesses the fair value of its portfolio of
investment securities at least on a quarterly basis, which includes analyzing
changes in fair value that have resulted in losses that may be considered
other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of
the investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry
reports, sector credit ratings, economic environment, creditworthiness of the
issuers and any guarantees.
Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product
type, characteristics and market liquidity. At the end of each period,
management assesses the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability
measured. The fair value measurement analysis performed by Oriental includes
validation procedures and review of market changes, pricing methodology,
assumption and level hierarchy changes, and evaluation of distressed
transactions.
Refer to Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements for a
description of Oriental’s valuation methodologies used for the assets and
liabilities measured at fair value.
Interest on Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease
Losses
Interest on loans is
accrued and recorded as interest income based upon the principal amount
outstanding.
Non-accrual loans are those
loans on which the accrual of interest is discontinued. When a loan is placed
on non-accrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is charged
against income and the loan is accounted for either on a cash-basis method or
on the cost-recovery method. Loans designated as non-accruing are returned to
accrual status when Oriental expects repayment of the remaining contractual
principal and interest. The determination as to the ultimate collectability of
the loan’s balance may involve management’s judgment in the evaluation of the
borrower’s financial condition and prospects for repayment.
Refer to the MD&A
section titled Credit Risk Management, particularly the “Non-performing Assets”
sub-section, for a detailed description of Oriental’s non-accruing and
charge-off policies by major loan categories.
One of the most critical
and complex accounting estimates is associated with the determination of the
allowance for loan and lease losses. The provision for loan losses charged to
current operations is based on this determination. Oriental’s assessment of the
allowance for loan and lease losses is determined in accordance with accounting
guidance, specifically guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20
and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35.
For a detailed description
of the principal factors used to determine the general reserves of the
allowance for loan and lease losses and for the principal enhancements
management made to its methodology, refer to Notes 1 and 7 to the consolidated
financial statements.
According to the loan
impairment accounting guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35, a loan is impaired
when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the
principal and/or interest are not going to be collected according to the
original contractual terms of the loan agreement. Current information and
events include “environmental” factors, such as existing industry,
geographical, economic and political factors. Probable means the future event
or events which will confirm the loss or impairment of the loan is likely to
occur. The collateral dependent method is generally used for the impairment
determination on commercial loans since the expected realizable value of the
loan is based upon the proceeds received from the liquidation of the collateral
property. For commercial properties, the “as is” value or the “income approach”
value is used depending on the financial condition of the subject borrower
and/or the nature of the subject collateral. In most cases, impaired commercial
loans do not have reliable or sustainable cash flow to use the discounted cash
flow valuation method. Appraisals may be adjusted due to their age, property
conditions, geographical area or general market conditions. The adjustments
applied are based upon internal information, like other appraisals and/or loss
severity information that can provide historical trends in the real estate
market. Discount rates used may change from time to time based on management’s
estimates.
For additional information
on Oriental’s policy of its impaired loans, refer to Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Oriental’s management
evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses on a
quarterly basis following a systematic methodology in order to provide for
known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. In developing its assessment of
the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, Oriental must rely on
estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is
unknown, such as economic developments affecting specific customers, industries
or markets. Other factors that can affect management’s estimates are the years
of historical data to include when estimating losses, the level of volatility
of losses in a specific portfolio, changes in underwriting standards, financial
accounting standards and loan impairment measurement, among others. Changes in
the financial condition of individual borrowers, in economic conditions, in
historical loss experience and in the condition of the various markets in which
collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance for
loan losses. Consequently, the business, financial condition, liquidity,
capital and results of operations could also be affected.
A restructuring constitutes
a "troubled-debt restructuring" ("TDR") when Oriental
separately concludes that the restructuring constitutes a concession and the
debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. For information on Oriental’s
TDR policy, refer to Note 1 to the financial consolidated statements.
Acquisition
Accounting for Loans
Oriental has acquired loans in two separate acquisitions, the BBVAPR
Acquisition in December 2012 and the FDIC-assisted Eurobank acquisition in
April 2010. Oriental accounted for both acquisitions under the accounting
guidance of ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the
purchase method of accounting.
All identifiable assets and liabilities acquired were
initially recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan and lease losses
related to the acquired loans was recorded on the acquisition date as the fair
value of the loans acquired incorporated assumptions regarding credit risk.
Loans acquired were recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value
methodology prescribed in ASC Topic 820. These fair value estimates associated
with the loans included estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount
and timing of expected principal, interest and other cash flows.
Because the FDIC agreed to reimburse Oriental for
losses related to the acquired loans in the FDIC-assisted Eurobank transaction,
subject to certain provisions specified in the agreements, an indemnification
asset was recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The indemnification
asset was recognized at the same time as the indemnified loans, and was
measured on the same basis, subject to collectability or contractual
limitations. The shared-loss indemnification asset on the acquisition date
reflected the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an
appropriate discount rate, which reflected counterparty credit risk and other
uncertainties. On February 6, 2017, the Bank and the FDIC agreed to terminate
the single family and commercial shared-loss agreements related to the FDIC-assisted
acquisition.
The initial valuation of these loans and related
indemnification asset required management to make subjective judgments
concerning estimates about how the acquired loans would perform in the future
using valuation methods, including discounted cash flow analyses and
independent third-party appraisals. Factors that may significantly affect the
initial valuation included, among others, market-based and industry data
related to expected changes in interest rates, assumptions related to
probability and severity of credit losses, estimated timing of credit losses
including the timing of foreclosure and liquidation of collateral, expected
prepayment rates, required or anticipated loan modifications, unfunded loan
commitments, the specific terms and provisions of any shared-loss agreement,
and specific industry and market conditions that may impact discount rates and
independent third-party appraisals.
For both
acquisitions, Oriental considered the following factors as indicators that an
acquired loan had evidence of deterioration in credit quality and was therefore
in the scope of ASC 310-30:
·
Loans that were 90 days or more
past due;
·
Loans that had an internal risk
rating of substandard or worse substandard is consistent with regulatory
definitions and is defined as having a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes
liquidation of the loan;
·
Loans that were classified as
nonaccrual by the acquired bank at the time of acquisition; and
·
Loans that had been previously
modified in a troubled debt restructuring.
Any acquired loans that were
not individually in the scope of ASC 310-30 because they did not meet the
criteria above were either (i) pooled into groups of similar loans based on the
borrower type, loan purpose, and collateral type and accounted for under ASC
310-30 by analogy or (ii) accounted for under ASC 310-20 (Non-refundable fees
and other costs).
Acquired Loans Accounted for under ASC 310-20 (loans with revolving
feature and/or acquired at a premium)
Revolving credit facilities such as credit cards,
retail and commercial lines of credit and floor plans which are specifically
scoped out of ASC 310-30 are accounted for under the provisions of ASC 310-20.
Also, performing auto loans with FICO scores over 660 acquired at a premium in
the BBVAPR Acquisition are accounted for under this guidance. Auto loans with
FICO scores below 660 were acquired at a discount and are accounted for under
the provisions of ASC 310-30. The provisions of ASC 310-20 require that any
differences between the contractually required loan payments in excess of
Oriental’s initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income on
a level-yield basis over the life of the loan. Loans acquired in the BBVAPR
Acquisition that were accounted for under the provisions of ASC 310-20, which
had fully amortized their premium or discount recorded at the date of
acquisition, are removed from the acquired loan category. Loans accounted for
under ASC 310-20 are placed on non-accrual status when past due in accordance
with Oriental’s non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is
discontinued. These assets were recorded at estimated fair value on their
acquisition date, incorporating an estimate of future expected cash flows. Such
fair value includes a credit discount which accounts for expected loan losses
over the estimated life of these loans. Management takes into consideration
this credit discount when determining the necessary allowance for acquired
loans that are accounted for under the provisions of ASC 310-20.
The allowance for loan and lease losses model for
acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 is the same as for the originated
loan portfolio.
Acquired Loans Accounted under ASC 310-30 (including
those accounted for under ASC 310-30 by analogy)
Oriental performed a fair
market valuation of each of the loan pools, and each pool was recorded at a
discount. Oriental determined that at least part of the discount on the
acquired individual or pools of loans was attributable to credit quality by
reference to the valuation model used to estimate the fair value of these pools
of loans. The valuation model incorporated lifetime expected credit losses into
the loans’ fair valuation in consideration of factors such as evidence of
credit deterioration since origination and the amounts of contractually
required principal and interest that Oriental did not expect to collect as of
the acquisition date. Based on the guidance included in the December 18, 2009
letter from the AICPA Depository Institutions Panel to the Office of the Chief
Accountant of the SEC, Oriental has made an accounting policy election to apply
ASC 310-30 by analogy to all of these acquired pools of loans as they all (i)
were acquired in a business combination or asset purchase, (ii) resulted in
recognition of a discount attributable, at least in part, to credit quality,
and (iii) were not subsequently accounted for at fair value.
The excess of expected cash
flows from acquired loans over the estimated fair value of acquired loans at
acquisition is referred to as the accretable discount and is recognized into
interest income over the remaining life of the acquired loans using the
interest method. The difference between contractually required payments at
acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is
referred to as the nonaccretable discount. The nonaccretable discount
represents estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life
of the acquired loans. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows require
Oriental to evaluate the need for an addition to the allowance for loan losses.
Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows result in the reversal of the
associated allowance for loan losses, if any, and the reversal of a
corresponding amount of the nonaccretable discount which Oriental then
reclassifies as accretable discount that is recognized into interest income
over the remaining life of the loan using the interest method. Oriental’s
evaluation of the amount of future cash flows that it expects to collect takes
into account actual credit performance of the acquired loans to date and
Oriental’s best estimates for the expected lifetime credit performance of the
loans using currently available information. Charge-offs of the principal
amount on acquired loans would be first applied to the nonaccretable discount
portion of the fair value adjustment.
In accordance with ASC 310-30,
recognition of income is dependent on having a reasonable expectation about the
timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. Oriental performs
such an evaluation on a quarterly basis on both its acquired loans individually
accounted for under ASC 310-30 and those in pools accounted for under ASC
310-30 by analogy.
Cash flows for acquired loans
individually accounted for under ASC 310-30 are estimated on a quarterly basis.
Based on this evaluation, a determination is made as to whether or not Oriental
has a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows. Such an
expectation includes cash flows from normal customer repayment, collateral
value, foreclosure or other collection efforts. Cash flows for acquired loans
accounted for on a pooled basis under ASC 310-30 by analogy are also estimated
on a quarterly basis. For residential real estate, home equity and other
consumer loans, cash flow loss estimates are calculated based on a model that
incorporates a projected probability of default and loss. For commercial loans,
lifetime loss rates are assigned to each pool with consideration given for pool
make-up, including risk rating profile. Lifetime loss rates are developed from
internally generated historical loss data and are applied to each pool.
To
the extent that Oriental cannot reasonably estimate cash flows, interest income
recognition is discontinued. The unit of account for loans in pools accounted
for under ASC 310-30 by analogy is the pool of loans. Accordingly, as long as
Oriental can reasonably estimate cash flows for the pool as a whole, accretable
yield on the pool is recognized and all individual loans within the pool - even
those more than 90 days past due - would be considered to be accruing interest
in Oriental’s financial statement disclosures, regardless of whether or not
Oriental expects any principal or interest cash flows on an individual loan 90
days or more past due.
Oriental writes-off the loan’s recorded investment and
derecognizes the associated allowance for loan and lease losses for loans that
exit the acquired pools.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Summary for the fourth
quarter of 2018
·
Net
income available to shareholders of $23.1 million or $0.45 per fully diluted
share compared to the third quarter of 2018 with $19.6 million or $0.42 per
share and to the fourth quarter of 2017 with $13.6 million or $0.30 per share.
·
Originated
loan growth of 3.0% from the preceding quarter to $3.66 billion, with new loan
production of $323.0 million, continuing to exceed $300 million for the fourth
consecutive quarter.
·
Strong
performance metrics, with net interest margin of 5.26%, return on average assets
of 1.50%, return on average tangible common stockholders’ equity of 11.67%, and
efficiency ratio of 51.06%.
·
Record
total stockholders’ equity of approximately $1 billion, with book value per
common share of $17.90, tangible book value per common share of $16.15, and
capital metrics at multi-year highs.
·
Common
equity increased $84.0 million and preferred dividend payments dropped 53.0%
from the preceding quarter with the conversion into common stock of the Series
C 8.750% Non-Cumulative Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock.
·
16.7%
increase in the regular quarterly cash dividend per common share to $0.07,
resulting in an annualized rate of $0.28 per share.
Summary for the year
ended 2018
Oriental achieved strong core
growth in 2018 based on the continued success of our strategy of
differentiation – providing superior customer service, convenience and
technology – coupled with Puerto Rico’s emerging economic rebound.
Oriental’s operational and
financial results for the year included the following:
Operationally:
·
originated loans were up 17.3%;
·
average deposits grew 4.3% year
over year;
·
average non-interest-bearing
deposits were up 25%;
·
customer count expanded 4.6%;
·
NIM increased 5 basis points; and
·
credit quality consistently
improved.
Financially:
·
earnings per share increased 73%;
·
return on average assets expanded
47 basis points and return on average tangible common equity increased 431
basis points;
·
converted the Series C preferred
into common stock, which significantly boosted stockholders’ equity and enabled
Oriental to reduce our payout of preferred dividends;
·
increased Oriental’s quarterly
common dividend 17% to 28 cents per share a year; and
·
all capital metrics hit multi-year
highs.
Net income available to
shareholders of $72.4 million or $1.52 per fully diluted share compared to the
year ended 2017 with $38.8 million or $0.88 per share. 2017 included a $32.4
million pre-tax loan loss provision related to hurricanes Irma and Maria.
ANALYSIS OF
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following tables show major categories of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, their respective interest income, expenses,
yields and costs, and their impact on net interest income due to changes in
volume and rates for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
TABLE 1 - ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST
INCOME AND CHANGES DUE TO VOLUME/RATE
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018
AND 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Average rate
|
|
Average
balance
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
A - TAX EQUIVALENT SPREAD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets
|
$
|
360,419
|
|
$
|
345,647
|
|
6.02%
|
|
5.94%
|
|
$
|
5,985,523
|
|
$
|
5,818,597
|
Tax equivalent adjustment
|
|
8,003
|
|
|
4,791
|
|
0.13%
|
|
0.08%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Interest-earning assets - tax equivalent
|
|
368,422
|
|
|
350,438
|
|
6.15%
|
|
6.02%
|
|
|
5,985,523
|
|
|
5,818,597
|
Interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
44,525
|
|
|
41,475
|
|
0.83%
|
|
0.79%
|
|
|
5,353,138
|
|
|
5,226,654
|
Tax equivalent net interest income /
spread
|
|
323,897
|
|
|
308,963
|
|
5.32%
|
|
5.23%
|
|
|
632,385
|
|
|
591,943
|
Tax equivalent interest rate margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.45%
|
|
5.31%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B - NORMAL SPREAD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
32,340
|
|
|
28,607
|
|
2.50%
|
|
2.28%
|
|
|
1,293,407
|
|
|
1,255,881
|
Interest bearing cash and money market
investments
|
|
6,698
|
|
|
4,619
|
|
1.95%
|
|
1.06%
|
|
|
343,982
|
|
|
436,913
|
Total investments
|
|
39,038
|
|
|
33,226
|
|
2.38%
|
|
1.96%
|
|
|
1,637,389
|
|
|
1,692,794
|
Non-acquired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
35,499
|
|
|
37,465
|
|
5.20%
|
|
5.37%
|
|
|
683,228
|
|
|
697,873
|
Commercial
|
|
86,734
|
|
|
71,685
|
|
5.97%
|
|
5.73%
|
|
|
1,452,314
|
|
|
1,251,051
|
Consumer
|
|
42,112
|
|
|
39,133
|
|
11.94%
|
|
11.99%
|
|
|
352,760
|
|
|
326,482
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
95,805
|
|
|
78,626
|
|
9.31%
|
|
9.61%
|
|
|
1,029,039
|
|
|
818,155
|
Total non-acquired loans
|
|
260,150
|
|
|
226,909
|
|
7.40%
|
|
7.33%
|
|
|
3,517,341
|
|
|
3,093,561
|
Acquired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired BBVAPR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
27,248
|
|
|
30,205
|
|
5.45%
|
|
5.63%
|
|
|
499,874
|
|
|
536,247
|
Commercial
|
|
14,408
|
|
|
20,488
|
|
7.54%
|
|
8.53%
|
|
|
191,176
|
|
|
240,267
|
Consumer
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
4,534
|
|
21.04%
|
|
15.98%
|
|
|
13,691
|
|
|
28,375
|
Auto
|
|
3,861
|
|
|
9,726
|
|
11.61%
|
|
10.72%
|
|
|
33,251
|
|
|
90,698
|
Total acquired BBVAPR loans
|
|
48,397
|
|
|
64,953
|
|
6.56%
|
|
7.25%
|
|
|
737,992
|
|
|
895,587
|
Acquired Eurobank
|
|
12,834
|
|
|
20,559
|
|
13.83%
|
|
15.04%
|
|
|
92,801
|
|
|
136,655
|
Total loans
|
|
321,381
|
|
|
312,421
|
|
7.39%
|
|
7.57%
|
|
|
4,348,134
|
|
|
4,125,803
|
Total interest-earning
assets
|
|
360,419
|
|
|
345,647
|
|
6.02%
|
|
5.94%
|
|
|
5,985,523
|
|
|
5,818,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average rate
|
|
Average
balance
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
|
December
|
December
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW Accounts
|
|
4,496
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
0.42%
|
|
0.37%
|
|
|
1,079,538
|
|
|
1,059,051
|
Savings and money market
|
|
6,364
|
|
|
5,922
|
|
|
0.52%
|
|
0.51%
|
|
|
1,216,635
|
|
|
1,170,800
|
Time deposits
|
|
11,483
|
|
|
11,352
|
|
|
1.13%
|
|
1.09%
|
|
|
1,019,062
|
|
|
1,039,034
|
Total core deposits
|
|
22,343
|
|
|
21,167
|
|
|
0.67%
|
|
0.65%
|
|
|
3,315,235
|
|
|
3,268,885
|
Brokered deposits
|
|
9,751
|
|
|
8,211
|
|
|
1.97%
|
|
1.47%
|
|
|
496,171
|
|
|
557,115
|
|
|
32,094
|
|
|
29,378
|
|
|
0.84%
|
|
0.77%
|
|
|
3,811,406
|
|
|
3,826,000
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
1,075,681
|
|
|
860,287
|
Core deposit intangible amortization
|
|
859
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total deposits
|
|
32,953
|
|
|
30,298
|
|
|
0.67%
|
|
0.65%
|
|
|
4,887,087
|
|
|
4,686,287
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
|
7,794
|
|
|
7,223
|
|
|
2.18%
|
|
1.80%
|
|
|
357,086
|
|
|
401,070
|
Advances from FHLB and other borrowings
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
2.57%
|
|
2.32%
|
|
|
72,882
|
|
|
103,214
|
Subordinated capital notes
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
5.28%
|
|
4.31%
|
|
|
36,083
|
|
|
36,083
|
Total borrowings
|
|
11,572
|
|
|
11,177
|
|
|
2.48%
|
|
2.07%
|
|
|
466,051
|
|
|
540,367
|
Total interest bearing
liabilities
|
|
44,525
|
|
|
41,475
|
|
|
0.83%
|
|
0.79%
|
|
|
5,353,138
|
|
|
5,226,654
|
Net interest income / spread
|
$
|
315,894
|
|
$
|
304,172
|
|
|
5.19%
|
|
5.15%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.28%
|
|
5.23%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of average interest-earning
assets
over average interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
632,385
|
|
$
|
591,943
|
Average interest-earning assets to
average
interest-bearing liabilities ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.81%
|
|
|
111.33%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C - CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME DUE
TO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
$
|
(1,087)
|
|
$
|
6,899
|
|
$
|
5,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
12,878
|
|
|
(3,918)
|
|
|
8,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
11,791
|
|
|
2,981
|
|
|
14,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
2,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
(791)
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
(863)
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
(176)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
(356)
|
|
|
3,406
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
$
|
12,147
|
|
$
|
(425)
|
|
$
|
11,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 1A - ANALYSIS OF NET
INTEREST INCOME AND CHANGES DUE TO VOLUME/RATE
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
AND 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Average rate
|
|
Average
balance
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
A - TAX EQUIVALENT SPREAD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets
|
$
|
345,647
|
|
$
|
356,592
|
|
5.94%
|
|
5.74%
|
|
$
|
5,818,597
|
|
$
|
6,210,003
|
Tax equivalent adjustment
|
|
4,791
|
|
|
4,724
|
|
0.08%
|
|
0.08%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Interest-earning assets - tax equivalent
|
|
350,438
|
|
|
361,316
|
|
6.02%
|
|
5.82%
|
|
|
5,818,597
|
|
|
6,210,003
|
Interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
41,475
|
|
|
57,136
|
|
0.79%
|
|
1.00%
|
|
|
5,226,654
|
|
|
5,703,927
|
Tax equivalent net interest income /
spread
|
|
308,963
|
|
|
304,180
|
|
5.23%
|
|
4.82%
|
|
|
591,943
|
|
|
506,076
|
Tax equivalent interest rate margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.31%
|
|
4.90%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B - NORMAL SPREAD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
28,607
|
|
|
32,146
|
|
2.28%
|
|
2.39%
|
|
|
1,255,881
|
|
|
1,346,261
|
Interest bearing cash and money market
investments
|
|
4,619
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
1.06%
|
|
0.52%
|
|
|
436,913
|
|
|
484,586
|
Total investments
|
|
33,226
|
|
|
34,647
|
|
1.96%
|
|
1.89%
|
|
|
1,692,794
|
|
|
1,830,847
|
Non-acquired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
37,465
|
|
|
39,621
|
|
5.37%
|
|
5.33%
|
|
|
697,873
|
|
|
743,838
|
Commercial
|
|
71,685
|
|
|
63,186
|
|
5.73%
|
|
4.56%
|
|
|
1,251,051
|
|
|
1,385,421
|
Consumer
|
|
39,133
|
|
|
33,723
|
|
11.99%
|
|
11.77%
|
|
|
326,482
|
|
|
286,489
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
78,626
|
|
|
69,152
|
|
9.61%
|
|
9.65%
|
|
|
818,155
|
|
|
716,373
|
Total non-acquired loans
|
|
226,909
|
|
|
205,682
|
|
7.33%
|
|
6.57%
|
|
|
3,093,561
|
|
|
3,132,121
|
Acquired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired BBVAPR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
30,205
|
|
|
32,833
|
|
5.63%
|
|
5.60%
|
|
|
536,247
|
|
|
586,100
|
Commercial
|
|
20,488
|
|
|
26,288
|
|
8.53%
|
|
8.70%
|
|
|
240,267
|
|
|
302,323
|
Consumer
|
|
4,534
|
|
|
5,627
|
|
15.98%
|
|
16.72%
|
|
|
28,375
|
|
|
33,662
|
Auto
|
|
9,726
|
|
|
21,016
|
|
10.72%
|
|
11.34%
|
|
|
90,698
|
|
|
185,280
|
Total acquired BBVAPR loans
|
|
64,953
|
|
|
85,764
|
|
7.25%
|
|
7.74%
|
|
|
895,587
|
|
|
1,107,365
|
Acquired Eurobank
|
|
20,559
|
|
|
30,499
|
|
15.04%
|
|
21.84%
|
|
|
136,655
|
|
|
139,670
|
Total loans
|
|
312,421
|
|
|
321,945
|
|
7.57%
|
|
7.35%
|
|
|
4,125,803
|
|
|
4,379,156
|
Total interest-earning
assets
|
|
345,647
|
|
|
356,592
|
|
5.94%
|
|
5.74%
|
|
|
5,818,597
|
|
|
6,210,003
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average rate
|
|
Average
balance
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
December
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW Accounts
|
$
|
3,893
|
|
$
|
5,086
|
|
|
0.37%
|
|
0.42%
|
|
$
|
1,059,051
|
|
$
|
1,200,394
|
Savings and money market
|
|
5,922
|
|
|
5,441
|
|
|
0.51%
|
|
0.49%
|
|
|
1,170,800
|
|
|
1,114,931
|
Time deposits
|
|
11,352
|
|
|
10,582
|
|
|
1.09%
|
|
1.06%
|
|
|
1,039,034
|
|
|
999,231
|
Total core deposits
|
|
21,167
|
|
|
21,109
|
|
|
0.65%
|
|
0.64%
|
|
|
3,268,885
|
|
|
3,314,556
|
Brokered deposits
|
|
8,211
|
|
|
7,450
|
|
|
1.47%
|
|
1.20%
|
|
|
557,115
|
|
|
619,569
|
|
|
29,378
|
|
|
28,559
|
|
|
0.77%
|
|
0.73%
|
|
|
3,826,000
|
|
|
3,934,125
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
860,287
|
|
$
|
781,877
|
Deposits fair value premium amortization
|
|
-
|
|
|
(340)
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Core deposit intangible amortization
|
|
920
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total deposits
|
|
30,298
|
|
|
29,253
|
|
|
0.65%
|
|
0.62%
|
|
|
4,686,287
|
|
|
4,716,002
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
|
7,223
|
|
|
18,805
|
|
|
1.80%
|
|
2.83%
|
|
|
401,070
|
|
|
663,845
|
Advances from FHLB and other borrowings
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
6,186
|
|
|
2.32%
|
|
2.60%
|
|
|
103,214
|
|
|
238,366
|
Subordinated capital notes
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
4.31%
|
|
3.41%
|
|
|
36,083
|
|
|
85,714
|
Total borrowings
|
|
11,177
|
|
|
27,912
|
|
|
2.07%
|
|
2.83%
|
|
|
540,367
|
|
|
987,925
|
Total interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
41,475
|
|
|
57,165
|
|
|
0.79%
|
|
1.00%
|
|
|
5,226,654
|
|
|
5,703,927
|
Net interest income / spread
|
$
|
304,148
|
|
$
|
299,395
|
|
|
5.15%
|
|
4.74%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.23%
|
|
4.82%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of average interest-earning
assets over
average interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
591,943
|
|
$
|
506,076
|
Average interest-earning assets to
average
interest-bearing liabilities ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.33%
|
|
|
108.87%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C - CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME DUE
TO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
$
|
(2,613)
|
|
$
|
1,192
|
|
$
|
(1,421)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
(17,868)
|
|
|
8,344
|
|
|
(9,524)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
(20,481)
|
|
|
9,536
|
|
|
(10,945)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
(184)
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
(7,444)
|
|
|
(4,138)
|
|
|
(11,582)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
(5,193)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
(5,153)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
(12,821)
|
|
|
(2,869)
|
|
|
(15,690)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
$
|
(7,660)
|
|
$
|
12,405
|
|
$
|
4,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest
Income
Net interest income is a function of the difference between rates
earned on Oriental’s interest-earning assets and rates paid on its
interest-bearing liabilities (interest rate spread) and the relative amounts of
its interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (interest rate
margin). Oriental constantly monitors the composition and re-pricing of its
assets and liabilities to maintain its net interest income at adequate levels.
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
Net interest income of $315.9 million increased $11.7 million from
$304.2 million. Interest rate spread increased 4 basis points to 5.19% from
5.15% and net interest margin increased 5 basis points to 5.28% from 5.23%.
These increases are mainly due to the net effect of an increase of 8 basis
points in the average yield of total interest-earning assets and an increase of
4 basis point in average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest income increased as a result of:
·
Higher interest income from investment of $5.8 million, reflecting
an increase in interest rates of $6.8 million, partially offset by a decrease
in volume of $944 thousand. Cash and money market investments increased 87
basis points and investments securities increased 22 basis points, both mainly
due to higher rates; and
·
Higher interest income from originated loans of $33.5 million,
reflecting higher balances in the auto, commercial and consumer portfolios.
This increase also reflects higher interest rates in the originated loan
portfolio by 7 basis points.
Such increases in net interest income were adversely impacted:
·
A decrease of $24.5 million in the interest income from acquired
loans as such loans continue to be repaid, and a decrease of $2.6 million in
cost recoveries.
Comparison of years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
Net interest income of $304.2 million increased $4.8 million from
$299.4 million. Interest rate spread increased 41 basis points to 5.15% from
4.74% and net interest margin increased 41 basis points to 5.23% from 4.82%.
These increases are mainly due to the net effect of a 20 basis point increase
in the average yield of interest-earning assets from 5.74% to 5.94% and a 21
basis point decrease in average costs of interest-bearing liabilities from
1.00% to 0.79%.
Net interest income was positively impacted by:
·
Higher interest income from originated loans of $21.4 million, reflecting the recognition of $4.8 million
from the pay-off before maturity of a commercial loan previously classified as
non-accrual, and from higher yields in the commercial and retail loan
portfolios;
·
The recognition of $3.1 million in cost recoveries from the loan
pay-off by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (PRHFA) included as
interest income from acquired BBVAPR loans; and
·
Lower interest expenses on securities sold under agreements to
repurchase due to decreases in volume and interest rate of $7.4 million and
$4.1 million, respectively, mainly as a result of (i) the repayment at maturity
of a $232.0 million repurchase agreement at 4.78% in March 2017, and (ii) the
unwinding of $180.0 million repurchase agreements during 2017.
Net interest income was adversely impacted by:
·
A decrease of $30.9 million in the interest income from the
acquired BBVAPR and Eurobank loan portfolios as such loans continue to be
repaid;
·
A slight increase in interest expenses from deposits of 3.6% to
$30.3 million, reflecting lower volume balances by $184 thousand, offset by
$1.2 million higher interest rates; and
·
A slight decrease in interest income from investments of 4.1% to
$1.4 million, reflecting lower volume balances offset by higher yields on cash
balances.
TABLE
2 - NON-INTEREST INCOME SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Variance
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Banking service revenue
|
$
|
43,638
|
|
$
|
39,468
|
|
10.6%
|
Wealth management revenue
|
|
25,934
|
|
|
25,790
|
|
0.6%
|
Mortgage banking activities
|
|
4,767
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
17.7%
|
Total banking and financial service
revenue
|
|
74,339
|
|
|
69,308
|
|
7.3%
|
FDIC shared-loss benefit
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
-100.0%
|
Net gain on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of securities available for
sale
|
|
-
|
|
|
6,896
|
|
-100.0%
|
Derivatives
|
|
-
|
|
|
132
|
|
-100.0%
|
Early extinguishment of debt
|
|
-
|
|
|
(80)
|
|
100.0%
|
Other non-interest income
|
|
5,756
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
459.9%
|
|
|
5,756
|
|
|
9,379
|
|
-38.6%
|
Total non-interest income, net
|
$
|
80,095
|
|
$
|
78,687
|
|
1.8%
|
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income is affected by the amount of the trust department
assets under management, transactions generated by clients’ financial assets
serviced by the securities broker-dealer and insurance agency subsidiaries, the
level of mortgage banking activities, fees generated from loans and deposit
accounts, and gains on sales of assets.
Comparison of years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
Oriental recorded non-interest income, net, in the amount of $80.1
million, compared to $78.7 million, an increase of 1.8%, or $1.4 million. The
net increase in non-interest income was mainly due to:
·
An increase of $4.2 million in banking service revenue, mainly due
to higher electronic banking fees from higher transaction volume and sales.
Merchant business fees increased $2.1 million and debit card interchange fees
increased $2.0 million.
·
An increase of $717 thousand in mortgage banking activities,
mainly from higher net servicing fees by $1.1 million due to higher valuation
of servicing asset by $931 thousand, related to an increase in price, partially
offset by lower gains on loans sold due to lower volume by $364 thousand; and
·
A $5.0 million cash payment received from the Company’s insurance
carrier covering hurricane Marias’s impact on Oriental’s operations included in
other non-interest income, offset by the sale of $166.0 million mortgage-backed
securities at a gain of $6.9 million and the FDIC shared-loss benefit of $1.4
million in 2017.
Comparison of years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
Oriental recorded non-interest income, net, in the amount of $78.7
million, compared to $66.8 million, an increase of 17.8%, or $11.9 million. The
increase in non-interest income was mainly due to:
·
The elimination of the FDIC shared-loss expense as Oriental
entered into an agreement with the FDIC to terminate the shared-loss agreements
covering certain assets during the first quarter of 2017. During 2016, Oriental
recorded expenses of $13.6 million related to such agreement; and
·
The sale of $166.0 million of its mortgage-backed securities,
generating a gain of $6.9 million. As a result of this sale, Oriental unwound
$100 million of repurchase agreements at a cost of $80 thousand, included as a
loss on early extinguishment of debt in the consolidated statements of
operations. The transaction resulted in a net benefit of $6.8 million.
In the same period in 2016, Oriental sold $277.2 million
in mortgage-backed securities and $11.1 million in Puerto Rico government
bonds, resulting in a gain of $12.2 million. This transaction resulted in the
repayment before maturity of $268.0 million of a repurchase agreement at a cost
of $12.0 million, included as a loss on the early extinguishment of debt in the
consolidated statements of operations. The transaction resulted in a net
benefit of $207
thousand.
The increase
in non-interest income was partially offset by:
·
A decrease in banking service revenue of 5.2% or $2.2 million,
reflecting lower electronic banking fees, mainly related to business
interruption from the lack of electricity as a consequence of hurricanes Irma
and Maria which struck the island on September 7, 2017 and September 20, 2017,
respectively; and
·
A decrease in other non-interest income of $5.1 million which
reflects the receipt of $5.0 million
during 2016 from a loss in 2009 related to a private label collateralized
mortgage obligation.
TABLE
3 - NON-INTEREST EXPENSES SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Variance %
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Compensation and employee benefits
|
$
|
76,524
|
|
$
|
79,751
|
|
-4.0%
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
33,084
|
|
|
32,557
|
|
1.6%
|
Electronic banking charges
|
|
21,234
|
|
|
19,322
|
|
9.9%
|
Professional and service fees
|
|
12,442
|
|
|
12,406
|
|
0.3%
|
Taxes, other than payroll and income
taxes
|
|
9,017
|
|
|
9,187
|
|
-1.9%
|
Credit related expenses
|
|
8,890
|
|
|
7,992
|
|
11.2%
|
Information technology expenses
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
2.7%
|
Insurance
|
|
6,249
|
|
|
5,223
|
|
19.6%
|
Advertising, business promotion, and
strategic initiatives
|
|
5,084
|
|
|
5,616
|
|
-9.5%
|
Loan servicing and clearing expenses
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
4,693
|
|
2.5%
|
Loss on sale of foreclosed real estate
and other repossessed assets
|
|
4,662
|
|
|
4,634
|
|
0.6%
|
Communication
|
|
3,447
|
|
|
3,415
|
|
0.9%
|
Printing, postage, stationery and
supplies
|
|
2,217
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
-9.0%
|
Director and investor relations
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
1.6%
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
10,105
|
|
|
5,316
|
|
90.1%
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
$
|
207,081
|
|
$
|
201,631
|
|
2.7%
|
Relevant ratios and data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
53.07%
|
|
|
53.99%
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits to
non-interest expense
|
|
36.95%
|
|
|
39.55%
|
|
|
Compensation to average total assets
owned
|
|
1.19%
|
|
|
1.27%
|
|
|
Average number of employees
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
Average compensation per employee
|
$
|
54.97
|
|
$
|
55.00
|
|
|
Average loans per average employee
|
$
|
3,124
|
|
$
|
2,846
|
|
|
Non-Interest
Expenses
Comparison of years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
Non-interest expense was
$207.1 million, representing an increase of 2.7% compared to $201.6 million.
The increase in
non-interest expenses was driven by:
·
Higher other operating expenses by
$4.8 million, mainly attributed to an increase in the
reasonable estimate accrual of claims and settlements in the broker-dealer
subsidiary and to minor repairs to physical assets related to the impact of
hurricanes;
·
Higher electronic banking charges
by $1.9 million from increased transaction volume;
·
Higher insurance expenses by $1.0
million related to an increase in insurance premiums renewal as a consequence
of hurricanes; and
·
Higher credit-related expenses by
$898 thousand related to higher legal fees on foreclosed properties and other
real estate owned expenses.
The increases in the foregoing non-interest expenses were
offset by:
·
Lower compensation and employee
benefits by $3.2 million, mainly due to a decrease in the average number of
employees.
The efficiency ratio improved from
53.99% to 53.07%. The efficiency ratio measures how much of Oriental’s revenues
is used to pay operating expenses. Oriental computes its efficiency ratio by
dividing non-interest expenses by the sum of its net interest income and
non-interest income, but excluding gains on the sale of investment securities,
derivatives gains or losses, FDIC shared-loss benefit, losses on the early
extinguishment of debt, other gains and losses, and other income that may be
considered volatile in nature. Management believes that the exclusion of those
items permits consistent comparability. Amounts presented as part of
non-interest income that are excluded from efficiency ratio computation for the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 amounted to $5.8 million and $9.4
million, respectively.
Oriental implemented its disaster
response plan as hurricanes Irma and Maria approached its service areas. To
operate in disaster response mode, Oriental incurred expenses for, among other
things, buying diesel and generators for electric power, debris removal,
security services, property damages mitigation, and emergency communication
with customers regarding the status of its banking operations. Estimated losses
at December 31, 2017 amounted to $6.6 million. No additional losses have been
incurred at December 31, 2018.
Oriental maintains insurance for
casualty losses as well as for disaster response costs and certain revenue lost
through business interruption. Oriental received a $1.0 million partial payment
from its insurance carrier in December 2017 and a $5.7 million payment during
2018.
Comparison of years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
Non-interest expense was
$201.6 million, representing a decrease of 6.6% compared to $216.0 million.
The decrease in
non-interest expenses was driven by:
·
Lower losses on the sale of
foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets by $5.6 million due to
higher sales of foreclosed real estate at a gain and lower write-downs, mainly
in the acquired portfolio;
·
Lower insurance
expenses by $3.9 million as a result of a change in the calculation method of
the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund insurance. The change was effective beginning
with June 30, 2016 invoice, which was received during the third quarter of
2016;
·
Lower loan servicing and clearing
expenses by $3.6 million, mainly due to a reduction of $3.2 million in mortgage
servicing expense from the migration to in-house servicing during the third
quarter of 2016;
·
Lower credit related expenses by
$2.3 million, mainly due to a decrease in legal expenses from foreclosures of
$1.9 million; and
·
Lower other operating expense by
$3.4 million due to the settlement of outstanding claims at amounts below those
previously reserved by $1.4 million and decrease of $2.4 million in accrual for
claims and settlements expenses in our broker dealer subsidiary.
The decreases in the foregoing non-interest expenses were
partially offset by:
·
Higher compensation and employee
benefits by $3.0 million as a result of higher average employees until
hurricane Maria; and
·
Higher occupancy and equipment
expenses by $2.3 million, primarily due to lower rent income and an increase in
internet services.
The efficiency ratio improved to 53.99%
from 57.82%. The efficiency ratio measures how much of Oriental’s revenues is
used to pay operating expenses. Oriental computes its efficiency ratio by
dividing non-interest expenses by the sum of its net interest income and
non-interest income, but excluding gains on the sale of investment securities,
derivatives gains or losses, FDIC shared-loss benefit/expense, losses on the
early extinguishment of debt, other gains and losses, and other income that may
be considered volatile in nature. Management believes that the exclusion of
those items permits consistent comparability. Amounts presented as part of
non-interest income that are excluded from efficiency ratio computation for
2017 and 2016 amounted to $9.4 million income and a $7.3 million loss,
respectively.
Provision for
Loan and Lease Losses
Comparison of years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
Based on an
analysis of the credit quality and the composition of Oriental’s loan
portfolio, management determined that the provision for the year was adequate
to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at an appropriate level to
provide for probable losses based upon an evaluation of known and inherent
risks.
Provision
for loan and lease losses decreased 50.4%, or $57.0 million, to $56.1 million. The decrease in the provision was mostly due to:
The
hurricanes provision of $32.4 million in 2017;
A $4.3 million provision in the second
quarter of 2017 to charge-off the loss on sale of a loan to a Puerto Rico
government municipality and a $5.9 million provision to increase the general
allowance on the remaining municipal loan portfolio; and
The decrease in acquired loan portfolio
provision of $9.2 million, mainly from lower portfolio balances.
Please refer to the "Allowance for Loan and Lease
Losses" in the "Credit Risk Management" section of this MD&A
for a more detailed analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses.
Comparison
of years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
Provision for
loan and lease losses increased 73.9%, or $48.1 million, to $113.1 million.
Oriental was impacted by hurricanes Irma and Maria, which struck the island on
September 7, 2017 and September 20, 2017, respectively. Based on our assessment
of the facts related to these hurricanes, we increased our provision for loan
losses $32.4 million, $17.2 million for originated loans and $15.2 million for
acquired loans.
Excluding the special provision made
as a result of the hurricanes in 2017, the total provision increased $15.7
million. Provision for originated and other loan and lease losses increased by
$17.3 million, mainly from the increase in the provision for commercial loans.
Such provision includes $4.3 million recorded to charge-off the loss on sale of
a municipal loan and another provision of $5.9 million recorded for the general
allowance on the municipal loan portfolio during the second quarter of 2017.
Income Taxes
Comparison of years ended December 31, 2018
and 2017
Income tax expense was $48.4 million, compared to
$15.4 million, reflecting the effective income tax rate of 33.6% and the net
income before income taxes of $132.8 million for 2018. The income tax expense
included a non-cash expenses of $4.1 million reflecting the impact of changes
required as a result of new Puerto Rico tax reform legislation, which will
reduce the corporate income tax rate by 1.5% in 2019 and, therefore, caused
Oriental to take a deferred tax asset write-down.
Comparison of years ended December
31, 2017 and 2016
Income tax expense was $15.4 million, compared to
$26.0 million, reflecting the effective income tax rate of 22.7% and the net
income before income taxes of $68.1 million for 2017, due to higher a
proportion of exempt income and income subject to preferential rates.
Business Segments
Oriental segregates its businesses into the following major
reportable segments: Banking, Wealth Management, and Treasury. Management
established the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to
evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors
such as Oriental’s organization, nature of its products, distribution channels
and economic characteristics of its services were also considered in the
determination of the reportable segments. Oriental measures the performance of
these reportable segments based on pre-established goals of different financial
parameters such as net income, net interest income, loan production, and fees
generated. Oriental’s methodology for allocating non-interest expenses among
segments is based on several factors such as revenue, employee headcount,
occupied space, dedicated services or time, among others. Following are the
results of operations and the selected financial information by operating
segment for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth
|
|
|
|
|
Total Major
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Banking
|
|
Management
|
|
Treasury
|
|
Segments
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Interest income
|
$
|
320,084
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
$
|
40,289
|
|
$
|
360,419
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
360,419
|
Interest expense
|
|
(29,746)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(14,779)
|
|
|
(44,525)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(44,525)
|
Net interest income
|
|
290,338
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
25,510
|
|
|
315,894
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
315,894
|
Provision for
loan and lease losses
|
|
(55,885)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(223)
|
|
|
(56,108)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(56,108)
|
Non-interest income
|
|
53,592
|
|
|
26,457
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
80,095
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
80,095
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
(186,460)
|
|
|
(16,440)
|
|
|
(4,181)
|
|
|
(207,081)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(207,081)
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
(2,126)
|
|
|
-
|
Intersegment expenses
|
|
-
|
|
|
(788)
|
|
|
(1,338)
|
|
|
(2,126)
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
-
|
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
103,711
|
|
$
|
9,275
|
|
$
|
19,814
|
|
$
|
132,800
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
132,800
|
Income tax expense
|
|
40,447
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
4,326
|
|
|
48,390
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
48,390
|
Net income
|
$
|
63,264
|
|
$
|
5,658
|
|
$
|
15,488
|
|
$
|
84,410
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
84,410
|
Total assets
|
$
|
5,863,067
|
|
$
|
25,757
|
|
$
|
1,708,455
|
|
$
|
7,597,279
|
|
$
|
(1,013,927)
|
|
$
|
6,583,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth
|
|
|
|
|
Total Major
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Banking
|
|
Management
|
|
Treasury
|
|
Segments
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Interest income
|
$
|
311,503
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
$
|
34,091
|
|
$
|
345,647
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
345,647
|
Interest expense
|
|
(26,308)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(15,167)
|
|
|
(41,475)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(41,475)
|
Net interest income
|
|
285,195
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
|
304,172
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
304,172
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
(113,108)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
|
(113,139)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(113,139)
|
Non-interest income (loss)
|
|
45,102
|
|
|
26,069
|
|
|
7,516
|
|
|
78,687
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
78,687
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
(184,567)
|
|
|
(13,486)
|
|
|
(3,578)
|
|
|
(201,631)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(201,631)
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
|
(2,352)
|
|
|
-
|
Intersegment expenses
|
|
(748)
|
|
|
(1,137)
|
|
|
(467)
|
|
|
(2,352)
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
|
-
|
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
33,478
|
|
$
|
11,499
|
|
$
|
23,112
|
|
$
|
68,089
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
68,089
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
13,057
|
|
|
4,485
|
|
|
(2,099)
|
|
|
15,443
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
15,443
|
Net income
|
$
|
20,421
|
|
$
|
7,014
|
|
$
|
25,211
|
|
$
|
52,646
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
52,646
|
Total assets
|
$
|
5,597,077
|
|
$
|
25,980
|
|
$
|
1,536,417
|
|
$
|
7,159,474
|
|
$
|
(970,421)
|
|
$
|
6,189,053
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth
|
|
|
|
|
Total Major
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Banking
|
|
Management
|
|
Treasury
|
|
Segments
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Interest income
|
$
|
321,868
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
$
|
34,659
|
|
$
|
356,592
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
356,592
|
Interest expense
|
|
(27,838)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(29,327)
|
|
|
(57,165)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(57,165)
|
Net interest income
|
|
294,030
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
5,332
|
|
|
299,427
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
299,427
|
Provision for
loan and lease losses
|
|
(65,076)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(65,076)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(65,076)
|
Non-interest income
|
|
35,587
|
|
|
26,788
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
|
66,819
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
66,819
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
(193,156)
|
|
|
(17,443)
|
|
|
(5,391)
|
|
|
(215,990)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(215,990)
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
(2,404)
|
|
|
-
|
Intersegment expenses
|
|
(883)
|
|
|
(1,108)
|
|
|
(413)
|
|
|
(2,404)
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
-
|
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
72,023
|
|
$
|
8,302
|
|
$
|
4,855
|
|
$
|
85,180
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
85,180
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
28,089
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
(5,333)
|
|
|
25,994
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
25,994
|
Net income
|
$
|
43,934
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
$
|
10,188
|
|
$
|
59,186
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
59,186
|
Total assets
|
$
|
5,584,866
|
|
$
|
23,315
|
|
$
|
1,837,514
|
|
$
|
7,445,695
|
|
$
|
(943,871)
|
|
$
|
6,501,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of years ended December 31, 2018
and 2017
Banking
Oriental's banking
segment net income before taxes increased $64.2 million from $39.5 million to
$103.7 million, mainly reflecting:
·
The special
provision for loan and lease losses of $32.4 million related to hurricanes Irma
and Maria in 2017;
·
A
$4.3 million provision in the second quarter of 2017 to charge-off the loss on
sale of a loan to a Puerto Rico government municipality and a $5.9 million
provision to increase the general allowance on the remaining municipal loan
portfolio;
·
A decrease
in acquired loan portfolio provision of $9.2 million, mainly from lower
portfolio balances.
·
A $5.0 million cash payment received from the Company’s insurance
carrier covering hurricane Marias’s impact on Oriental’s operations included in
other non-interest income.
Wealth Management
Wealth management segment revenue, which consists of commissions and fees from
fiduciary activities, and securities brokerage and insurance activities, decreased
$1.4 million to $5.7 million due to higher non-interest expenses by $3.0
million, mainly driven from the increase in the reasonable estimate accrual of claims
and settlements in the broker-dealer subsidiary by $4.2 million.
Treasury
Treasury
segment net income before taxes decreased $1.6 million from $21.4 million to
$19.8 million, reflecting:
·
The sale of $166.0 million in mortgage-backed securities during
the second quarter of 2017, which generated a gain of $6.9 million.
Such decrease was partially offset
by:
·
Higher
interest income from investment by $5.8 million, reflecting an increase in
interest rates of $6.8 million, partially offset by a decrease in volume of
$944 thousand.
Comparison
of years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
Banking
Oriental's
banking segment net income before taxes decreased $32.5 million to $39.5
million, reflecting:
·
A
decrease in net interest income by $8.8 million, mainly from the acquired
BBVAPR and Eurobank loan portfolios as such loans continue to be repaid;
·
The special
provision for loan and lease losses of $32.4 million related to hurricanes Irma
and Maria;
·
An increase in
the provision for loan and lease losses, excluding the aforementioned special
hurricane provision, of $15.6 million, which includes $4.3 million recorded to
charge-off the loss on sale of a municipal loan and another provision of $5.9
million recorded for the general allowance on the municipal loan portfolio
during the second quarter of 2017;
·
Higher
non-interest income by $9.5 million, reflecting the termination of the FDIC
shared-loss agreement in the first quarter of 2017; and
·
Lower non-interest
expenses by $14.6 million mainly as a result of lower losses on the sale of
foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets by $5.6 million, lower
insurance expenses by $3.9 million, lower loan servicing and clearing expenses
by $3.6 million, and to lower credit related expenses by $2.3 million.
Wealth
Management
Wealth management segment revenue, which consists of commissions and fees from
fiduciary activities, and securities brokerage and insurance activities,
decreased $1.1 million to $7.2 million mainly due to lower activity levels in
the third quarter of 2017 related to hurricanes Irma and Maria.
Treasury
Treasury
segment net income before taxes, which consists of Oriental's asset/liability
management activities, such as purchase and sale of investment securities,
interest rate risk management, derivatives, and borrowings, increased to $21.4
million, compared to $4.9 million, reflecting:
·
Lower interest
expenses on securities sold under agreements to repurchase as a result of (i)
the repayment at maturity of a $232.0 million repurchase agreement at 4.78% in
March 2017, and (ii) the unwinding of $180.0 million repurchase agreements
during 2017; and
·
The sale of
$166.0 million mortgage-backed securities, generating a gain of $6.9 million
during 2017.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Assets
Owned
At December 31, 2018,
Oriental’s total assets amounted to $6.583 billion representing an increase of
6.4% when compared to $6.189 billion at December 31, 2017. This increase is
attributable to an increase in the loans and investments portfolios of $375.3
million and $113.6 million, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in
cash and cash equivalents of $38.2 million.
Oriental’s loan portfolio is
comprised of residential mortgage loans, commercial loans collateralized by
mortgages on real estate, other commercial and industrial loans, consumer
loans, and auto loans. At December 31, 2018, Oriental’s loan portfolio
increased 9.3%. Loan production during 2018, reached $1.411 billion compared to
$917.8 million a year ago, a 53.8% increase. The non-acquired loan portfolio
increased $540.2 million from December 31, 2017 to $3.745 billion at December
31, 2018. From December 31, 2017, the BBVAPR acquired loan portfolio decreased
$149.4 million to $676.5 million and the Eurobank acquired loan portfolio
decreased $12.2 million to $87.1 million at December 31, 2018.
Oriental's investment
portfolio increased 9.7% to $1.280 billion at December 31, 2018, mainly
attributed to the purchase of $272.1 million mortgage-backed securities
available-for-sale and retained securitized GNMA pools totaling $74.1 million,
partially offset by maturities and paydowns in the investment
available-for-sale portfolio of $138.5 million and in the investment securities
held-to-maturity portfolio of $77.6 million during the year ended December 31,
2018.
Cash and cash equivalents
decreased 7.9% to $447.0 million, mainly attributed to funding of new loans.
Accrued interest receivable resulting
from Oriental’s loan payment moratoriums after hurricanes Irma and Maria have
decreased from December 31, 2017, as such moratoriums have expired. Some of
these accrued interests is payable upon maturity of the loan.
Financial Assets
Managed
Oriental’s financial assets
include those managed by Oriental’s trust division, retirement plan
administration subsidiary, and assets gathered by its broker-dealer and
insurance subsidiaries. Oriental’s trust division offers various types of
individual retirement accounts ("IRAs") and manages 401(k) and Keogh
retirement plans and custodian and corporate trust accounts, while the
retirement plan administration subsidiary, OPC, manages private retirement
plans. At December 31, 2018, total assets managed by Oriental’s trust division
and OPC amounted to $2.771 billion, compared to $3.040 billion at December 31,
2017. Oriental Financial Services offers a wide array of investment
alternatives to its client base, such as tax-advantaged fixed income securities,
mutual funds, stocks, bonds and money management wrap-fee programs. At December
31, 2018, total assets gathered by Oriental Financial Services and Oriental
Insurance from its customer investment accounts amounted to $2.116 billion,
compared to $2.250 billion at December 31, 2017. Changes in trust and
broker-dealer related assets primarily reflect changes in portfolio balances
and differences in market values.
Goodwill
Goodwill
recorded in connection with the BBVAPR Acquisition and the FDIC-assisted
Eurobank acquisition is not amortized to expense but is tested at least
annually for impairment. A quantitative annual impairment test is not required
if, based on a qualitative analysis, Oriental determines that the existence of
events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that goodwill
is not impaired. Oriental completes its annual goodwill impairment test as of
October 31 of each year. Oriental tests for impairment by first allocating its
goodwill and other assets and liabilities, as necessary, to defined reporting
units. A fair value is then determined for each reporting unit. If the fair
values of the reporting units exceed their book values, no write-down of the
recorded goodwill is necessary. If the fair values are less than the book
values, an additional valuation procedure is necessary to assess the proper
carrying value of the goodwill.
Reporting
unit valuation is inherently subjective, with a number of factors based on
assumptions and management judgments or estimates. Actual values may differ
significantly from such estimates. Among these are future growth rates for the
reporting units, selection of comparable market transactions, discount rates
and earnings capitalization rates. Changes in assumptions and results due to
economic conditions, industry factors, and reporting unit performance and cash
flow projections could result in different assessments of the fair values of
reporting units and could result in impairment charges. If an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a
reporting unit below its carrying amount, an interim impairment test is
required.
Relevant events and circumstances for evaluating whether it
is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than
its carrying amount may include macroeconomic conditions (such as a further
deterioration of the Puerto Rico economy or the liquidity for Puerto Rico
securities or loans secured by assets in Puerto Rico), adverse changes in legal
factors or in the business climate, adverse actions by a regulator,
unanticipated competition, the loss of key employees, or similar events. Oriental’s
loan portfolio, which is the largest component of its interest-earning assets,
is concentrated in Puerto Rico and is directly affected by adverse local
economic and fiscal conditions. Such conditions have generally affected the
market demand for non-conforming loans secured by assets in Puerto Rico and,
therefore, affect the valuation of Oriental’s assets.
As of
December 31, 2018, Oriental had $86.1 million of goodwill allocated as follows:
$84.1 million to the Banking unit and $2.0 million to the Wealth Management
unit. During the last quarter of 2018, based on its annual goodwill impairment test,
Oriental determined that both units passed step one of the two-step impairment
test. As a result of step one, the fair value of
both units exceeded its adjusted net book value. Accordingly, Oriental
determined that the carrying value of the goodwill allocated to the Banking
unit and Wealth Management was not impaired as of the valuation date.
FDIC
Indemnification Asset
On February 6,
2017, the Bank and the FDIC agreed to terminate the single family and
commercial shared-loss agreements related to the FDIC-assisted acquisition of
Eurobank on April 30, 2010. As part of the loss share termination
transaction, the Bank made a payment of $10.1 million to the FDIC and
recorded a net benefit of $1.4 million. Such termination
payment took into account the anticipated reimbursements over the life of the
shared-loss agreements and the true-up payment liability of the Bank
anticipated at the end of the ten-year term of the single family shared-loss
agreement. All rights and obligations of the parties under the shared-loss
agreements terminated as of the closing date of the agreement.
TABLE
4 - ASSETS SUMMARY AND COMPOSITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
Variance
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
978,071
|
|
$
|
887,779
|
|
10.2%
|
Obligations of US
government-sponsored agencies
|
|
2,265
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
-21.3%
|
US Treasury securities
|
|
10,805
|
|
|
10,163
|
|
6.3%
|
CMOs issued by US
government-sponsored agencies
|
|
64,064
|
|
|
80,071
|
|
-20.0%
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
210,169
|
|
|
167,338
|
|
25.6%
|
Puerto Rico government and public
instrumentalities
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
-100.0%
|
FHLB stock
|
|
12,644
|
|
|
13,995
|
|
-9.7%
|
Other debt securities
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
-20.5%
|
Other investments
|
|
364
|
|
|
194
|
|
87.6%
|
Total investments
|
|
1,279,604
|
|
|
1,166,050
|
|
9.7%
|
Loans
|
|
4,431,594
|
|
|
4,056,329
|
|
9.3%
|
Total investments and loans
|
|
5,711,198
|
|
|
5,222,379
|
|
9.4%
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks (including
restricted cash)
|
|
445,133
|
|
|
481,212
|
|
-7.5%
|
Money market investments
|
|
4,930
|
|
|
7,021
|
|
-29.8%
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
33,768
|
|
|
44,174
|
|
-23.6%
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
34,254
|
|
|
49,969
|
|
-31.4%
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
113,763
|
|
|
127,421
|
|
-10.7%
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
68,892
|
|
|
67,860
|
|
1.5%
|
Servicing assets
|
|
10,716
|
|
|
9,821
|
|
9.1%
|
Derivative assets
|
|
347
|
|
|
771
|
|
-55.0%
|
Goodwill
|
|
86,069
|
|
|
86,069
|
|
0.0%
|
Other assets and customers'
liability on acceptances
|
|
74,282
|
|
|
92,356
|
|
-19.6%
|
Total other assets
|
|
872,154
|
|
|
966,674
|
|
-9.8%
|
Total assets
|
$
|
6,583,352
|
|
$
|
6,189,053
|
|
6.4%
|
Investment portfolio composition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
|
76.5%
|
|
|
76.1%
|
|
|
Obligations of US
government-sponsored agencies
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
US Treasury securities
|
|
0.8%
|
|
|
0.9%
|
|
|
CMOs issued by US
government-sponsored agencies
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
16.4%
|
|
|
14.4%
|
|
|
Puerto Rico government and public
instrumentalities
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
Other debt securities and other
investments
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
TABLE
5 — LOANS RECEIVABLE COMPOSITION
|
|
December 31
|
|
Variance
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Originated and other loans and leases
held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
668,809
|
|
$
|
683,607
|
|
-2.2%
|
Commercial
|
|
1,597,588
|
|
|
1,307,261
|
|
22.2%
|
Consumer
|
|
348,980
|
|
|
330,039
|
|
5.7%
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
1,129,695
|
|
|
883,985
|
|
27.8%
|
|
|
3,745,072
|
|
|
3,204,892
|
|
16.9%
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses on originated and other loans and leases
|
|
(95,188)
|
|
|
(92,718)
|
|
2.7%
|
|
|
3,649,884
|
|
|
3,112,174
|
|
17.3%
|
Deferred loan costs, net
|
|
7,740
|
|
|
6,695
|
|
15.6%
|
Total originated and other loans
held for investment, net
|
|
3,657,624
|
|
|
3,118,869
|
|
17.3%
|
Acquired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired BBVAPR loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounted for under ASC 310-20
(Loans with revolving feature and/or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquired at a premium)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
4,380
|
|
-41.9%
|
Consumer
|
|
23,988
|
|
|
28,915
|
|
-17.0%
|
Auto
|
|
4,435
|
|
|
21,969
|
|
-79.8%
|
|
|
30,969
|
|
|
55,264
|
|
-44.0%
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses on acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for under ASC 310-20
|
|
(2,062)
|
|
|
(3,862)
|
|
-46.6%
|
|
|
28,907
|
|
|
51,402
|
|
-43.8%
|
Accounted for under ASC 310-30
(Loans acquired with deteriorated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
credit quality, including those
by analogy)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
492,890
|
|
|
532,053
|
|
-7.4%
|
Commercial
|
|
182,319
|
|
|
243,092
|
|
-25.0%
|
Consumer
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
-100.0%
|
Auto
|
|
14,403
|
|
|
43,696
|
|
-67.0%
|
|
|
689,612
|
|
|
820,272
|
|
-15.9%
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses on acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for under ASC 310-30
|
|
(42,010)
|
|
|
(45,755)
|
|
-8.2%
|
|
|
647,602
|
|
|
774,517
|
|
-16.4%
|
Total acquired BBVAPR loans, net
|
|
676,509
|
|
|
825,919
|
|
-18.1%
|
Acquired Eurobank loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans secured by 1-4 family
residential properties
|
|
63,392
|
|
|
69,538
|
|
-8.8%
|
Commercial
|
|
47,826
|
|
|
53,793
|
|
-11.1%
|
Consumer
|
|
846
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
-23.9%
|
|
|
112,064
|
|
|
124,443
|
|
-9.9%
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses on Eurobank loans
|
|
(24,971)
|
|
|
(25,174)
|
|
-0.8%
|
Total acquired Eurobank loans, net
|
|
87,093
|
|
|
99,269
|
|
-12.3%
|
Total acquired loans, net
|
|
763,602
|
|
|
925,188
|
|
-17.5%
|
Total held for investment,
net
|
|
4,421,226
|
|
|
4,044,057
|
|
9.3%
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
10,368
|
|
|
12,272
|
|
-15.5%
|
Total loans, net
|
$
|
4,431,594
|
|
$
|
4,056,329
|
|
9.3%
|
Oriental’s loan
portfolio is composed of two segments, loans initially accounted for under the
amortized cost method (referred to as "originated and other" loans)
and loans acquired (referred to as "acquired" loans). Acquired loans
are further segregated between acquired BBVAPR loans and acquired Eurobank
loans. Acquired Eurobank loans were purchased subject to loss-sharing
agreements with the FDIC, which were terminated on
February 6, 2017.
As shown in Table 5 above, total loans, net, amounted
to $4.432 billion at December 31, 2018 and $4.056 billion at December 31, 2017.
Oriental’s originated and other loans held-for-investment portfolio composition
and trends were as follows:
·
Mortgage loan portfolio amounted
to $668.8 million (17.9% of the gross originated loan portfolio) compared to
$683.6 million (21.3% of the gross originated loan portfolio) at December 31,
2017. Mortgage loan production totaled $119.7 million for 2018, which
represents a decrease of 13.1% from $137.8 million for the same periods in
2017. Mortgage loans included delinquent loans in the GNMA buy-back option
program amounting to $19.7 million and $8.3 million at December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2017, respectively. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA
mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans
that they have the option (but not the obligation) to repurchase, even when
they elect not to exercise that option.
·
Commercial loan portfolio amounted
to $1.598 billion (42.7% of the gross originated loan portfolio) compared to
$1.307 billion (40.8% of the gross originated loan portfolio) at December 31,
2017. Commercial loan production, including the U.S. loan program production of
$236.1 million, increased 101.1% to $603.5 million for 2018, from $300.2
million for the same period in 2017.
·
Consumer loan portfolio amounted
to $349.0 million (9.3% of the gross originated loan portfolio) compared to
$330.0 million (10.3% of the gross originated loan portfolio) at December 31,
2017. Consumer loan production increased 10.9% to $164.9 million for 2018 from
$148.6 million when compared to the same period in 2017.
·
Auto and leasing portfolio
amounted to $1.130 billion (30.1% of the gross originated loan portfolio)
compared to $884.0 million (27.6% of the gross originated loan portfolio) at
December 31, 2017. Auto production increased by 58.0% to $523.4 million for
2018, compared to $331.2 million for the same period in 2017.
The following table summarizes the remaining
contractual maturities of Oriental’s total gross non-covered loans, excluding
loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, segmented to reflect cash flows as of December
31, 2018. Contractual maturities do not necessarily reflect the period of
resolution of a loan, considering prepayments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or
Less
|
From One to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
After Five
Years
|
|
|
Balance
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
Interest Rates
|
|
|
Variable
Interest Rates
|
|
|
Fixed
Interest Rates
|
|
|
Variable
Interest Rates
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Originated and other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
668,809
|
|
$
|
2,771
|
|
$
|
11,608
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
654,430
|
|
$
|
-
|
Commercial
|
|
1,597,588
|
|
|
972,012
|
|
|
584,996
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
40,580
|
|
|
-
|
Consumer
|
|
348,980
|
|
|
37,017
|
|
|
241,454
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
70,509
|
|
|
-
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
1,129,695
|
|
|
11,044
|
|
|
467,136
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
651,515
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
$
|
3,745,072
|
|
$
|
1,022,844
|
|
$
|
1,305,194
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
1,417,034
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired loans accounted under ASC
310-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
1,510
|
|
$
|
1,510
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Commercial secured by real estate
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Consumer
|
|
23,988
|
|
|
23,988
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Auto
|
|
4,435
|
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
$
|
30,969
|
|
$
|
30,545
|
|
$
|
424
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
TABLE
6 — HIGHER RISK RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
Higher-Risk
Residential Mortgage Loans*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
Loan-to-Value Ratio Mortgages
|
|
Junior Lien
Mortgages
|
|
Interest Only
Loans
|
|
LTV 90% and
over
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Coverage
|
|
Value
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Coverage
|
|
Value
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Coverage
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Delinquency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 - 89 days
|
$
|
8,970
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
3.61%
|
|
$
|
7,977
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
4.11%
|
|
$
|
56,217
|
|
$
|
1,183
|
|
2.10%
|
90 - 119 days
|
|
49
|
|
|
7
|
|
14.29%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
37
|
|
1.89%
|
120 - 179 days
|
|
67
|
|
|
9
|
|
13.43%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
79
|
|
7.97%
|
180 - 364 days
|
|
164
|
|
|
30
|
|
18.29%
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
86
|
|
19.50%
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
135
|
|
6.87%
|
365+ days
|
|
232
|
|
|
33
|
|
14.22%
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
283
|
|
19.32%
|
|
|
8,081
|
|
|
569
|
|
7.04%
|
Total
|
$
|
9,482
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
4.25%
|
|
$
|
9,883
|
|
$
|
697
|
|
7.05%
|
|
$
|
69,208
|
|
$
|
2,003
|
|
2.89%
|
Percentage of total loans excluding
acquired loans accounted for under
ASC 310-30
|
|
0.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.83%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinanced or Modified Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
$
|
2,274
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
12.01%
|
|
$
|
511
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
11.94%
|
|
$
|
15,807
|
|
$
|
1,254
|
|
7.93%
|
Percentage of Higher-Risk Loan
Category
|
|
23.98%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.17%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.84%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan-to-Value Ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 70%
|
$
|
6,321
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
4.11%
|
|
$
|
1,199
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
3.59%
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
-
|
70% - 79%
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
79
|
|
5.78%
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
|
112
|
|
5.10%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
80% - 89%
|
|
998
|
|
|
5
|
|
0.50%
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
|
232
|
|
7.23%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
90% and over
|
|
797
|
|
|
59
|
|
7.40%
|
|
|
3,282
|
|
|
310
|
|
9.45%
|
|
|
69,208
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
2.89%
|
|
$
|
9,482
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
4.25%
|
|
$
|
9,883
|
|
$
|
697
|
|
7.05%
|
|
$
|
69,208
|
|
$
|
2,003
|
|
2.89%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Loans may be included in more than one
higher-risk loan category and excludes acquired residential mortgage loans.
|
Deposits
from the Puerto Rico government totaled $207.4 million at December 31, 2018.
The following table includes the maturities of Oriental's lending and
investment exposure to the Puerto Rico government, which is limited solely to
loans to municipalities secured by ad valorem taxation, without limitation as
to rate or amount, on all taxable property within the issuing municipalities.
The good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of each issuing
municipality are pledged for the payment of its general obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 7 - PUERTO RICO GOVERNMENT RELATED
LOANS AND SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
Loans and Securities:
|
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
|
Less than 1
Year
|
|
|
1 to 3 Years
|
|
|
More than 3
Years
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Municipalities
|
|
$
|
135,871
|
|
$
|
18,567
|
|
$
|
73,451
|
|
$
|
43,853
|
Credit Risk Management
Allowance for Loan and Lease
Losses
Oriental maintains an allowance for loan
and lease losses at a level that management considers adequate to provide for
probable losses based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks.
Oriental’s allowance for loan and lease losses ("ALLL") policy
provides for a detailed quarterly analysis of probable losses.
The analysis
includes a review of historical loan loss experience, value of underlying
collateral, current economic conditions, financial condition of borrowers and
other pertinent factors. While management uses available information in
estimating probable loan losses, future additions to the allowance may be
required based on factors beyond Oriental’s control. We also maintain an
allowance for loan losses on acquired loans when: (i) for loans accounted for
under ASC 310-30, there is deterioration in credit quality subsequent to the
acquisition, and (ii) for loans accounted for under ASC 310-20, the inherent
losses in the loans exceed the remaining credit discount recorded at the time
of acquisition.
At December 31, 2018,
Oriental’s allowance for loan and lease losses amounted to $164.2 million, a
$3.3 million decrease from $167.5 million at December 31, 2017.
As discussed in Note
2, hurricanes Irma and Maria caused catastrophic damages throughout Puerto Rico
in 2017. Management performed an evaluation of the loan portfolios in order to
assess the impact on repayment sources and underlying collateral that could
result in additional losses.
For the commercial
portfolio, the framework for the analysis was based on our current allowance
for loan and lease losses methodology with additional considerations according
to the estimated impact categorized as low, medium or high. From this impact
assessment, additional reserve levels were estimated by increasing default
probabilities (“PD”) and loss given default expectations (“LGD”) of each
allowance segment.
As part of the process, Oriental contacted its clients to evaluate the
impact of the hurricanes on their business operations and collateral. The
impact was then categorized as follows: (i) low risk, for clients that had no
business impact or relatively insignificant impact; (ii) medium risk, for
clients that had a business impact on their primary or secondary sources of
repayment, but had adequate cash flow to cover operations and to satisfy their
obligations; or (iii) high risk, for clients that had potentially significant
problems that affected primary, secondary and tertiary (collateral) sources of
repayment. This criterion was used to model adjusted PDs and LGDs considering
internal and external sources of information available to support our
estimation process and output.
During the fourth
quarter of 2017, Oriental performed an update of the initial estimate, taking
into consideration the most recent available information gathered through
additional visits and interviews with clients and the economic environment in
Puerto Rico.
For the retail
portfolios, mortgage, consumer and auto, the assumptions established in the
initial estimate were based on the historical losses of each ALLL segment and
then further adjusted based on parameters used as key risk indicators, such as
the industry of employment for all portfolios and the location of the
collateral for mortgage loans. During the fourth quarter of 2017, Oriental
performed additional procedures to evaluate the reasonability of the initial
estimate based on the payment experience percentage of borrowers for which the
deferral period expired. The analysis took into consideration historical
payment behavior and loss experience of borrowers (PDs and LGDs) of each
portfolio segment to develop a range of estimated potential losses. Management
understands that this approach is reasonable given the lack of historical
information related to the behavior of local borrowers in such an unprecedented
event. The amount used in the analysis represents the average of potential
outcomes of expected losses.
During 2018,
Oriental continued its monitoring process of the performance of those affected
borrowers. As additional information became available, it was incorporated into
the allowance framework.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Oriental's ALLL incorporated all risks
associated to our loan portfolio, including the impact of hurricanes Irma and
Maria.
Tables 8 through 10 set forth an
analysis of activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses and present
selected loan loss statistics. In addition, Table 5 sets forth the composition
of the loan portfolio.
Please refer to the “Provision for Loan
and Lease Losses” section in this MD&A for a more detailed analysis of
provisions for loan and lease losses.
Non-performing Assets
Oriental’s
non-performing assets include non-performing loans and foreclosed real estate
(see Tables 11 and 12). At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Oriental had $119.7
million and $99.7 million, respectively, of non-accrual loans, including
acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 (loans with revolving
feature and/or acquired at a premium).
At December 31,
2018 and 2017, loans whose terms have been extended and which are classified as
troubled-debt restructurings that are not included in non-performing assets
amounted to $112.9 million and $109.2 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, loans that are current in their monthly
payments, but placed in non-accrual amounted to $21.2 million and $20.1
million, respectively. During 2018, a $8.7 million loan that is current in its
monthly payments was placed in non-accrual due to credit deterioration after
the hurricanes.
Delinquent
residential mortgage loans insured or guaranteed under applicable FHA and VA
programs are classified as non-performing loans when they become 90 days or
more past due, but are not placed in non-accrual status until they become 12
months or more past due, since they are insured loans. Therefore, these loans
are included as non-performing loans but excluded from non-accrual loans.
Acquired loans with credit deterioration
are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method
under ASC 310-30, in which these loans will accrete interest income over their
remaining life using estimated cash flow analyses. Credit related decreases in
expected cash flows, compared to those previously forecasted are recognized by
recording a provision for credit losses on these loans when it is probable that
all cash flows expected at acquisition will not be collected.
Following hurricanes Irma and Maria,
Oriental offered automatic payment deferrals and 90-day extensions for most
loan categories. All of these payment moratoriums expired during the first quarters
of 2018 with most credit metrics better than, or returned to, pre-hurricane
levels.
At December 31, 2018, Oriental’s
non-performing assets increased by 3.0% to $161.3 million (2.76% of total
assets, excluding acquired loans with deteriorated credit quality) from $156.7
million (2.95% of total assets, excluding acquired loans with deteriorated
credit quality) at December 31, 2017. Foreclosed real estate and other
repossessed assets amounting to $33.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively,
at December 31, 2018, and $44.2 million and $3.5 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2017, were recorded at fair value. Oriental does not expect
non-performing loans to result in significantly higher losses. At December 31,
2018, the allowance coverage ratio for originated loan and lease losses to
non-performing loans was 77.38% (87.35% at December 31, 2017).
Oriental follows a conservative
residential mortgage lending policy, with more than 90% of its residential
mortgage portfolio consisting of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, fully documented
loans that do not have the level of risk associated with subprime loans offered
by certain major U.S. mortgage loan originators. Furthermore, Oriental has
never been active in negative amortization loans or adjustable rate mortgage
loans, including those with teaser rates.
The following items comprise
non-performing assets:
·
Originated and other loans held
for investment:
Residential mortgage loans — are placed on non-accrual status when they become
90 days or more past due and are written-down, if necessary, based on the
specific evaluation of the collateral underlying the loan, except for FHA and
VA insured mortgage loans which are placed in non-accrual when they become 12
months or more past due. At December 31, 2018, Oriental’s originated
non-performing mortgage loans totaled $63.7 million (51.1% of Oriental’s
non-performing loans), a 0.6% decrease from $64.1 million (58.7% of Oriental’s
non-performing loans) at December 31, 2017.
Commercial
loans — are placed on non-accrual
status when they become 90 days or more past due and are written-down, if
necessary, based on the specific evaluation of the underlying collateral, if
any. At December 31, 2018, Oriental’s originated non-performing commercial
loans amounted to $42.5 million (34.1% of Oriental’s non-performing loans), a
20.4% increase from $35.3 million at December 31, 2017 (32.4% of
Oriental’s non-performing loans). This increase is mainly from a $8.7 million
loan that is current in its monthly payments but was placed in non-accrual
during 2018 due to credit deterioration after the hurricanes.
Consumer loans
— are placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days past due and
written-off when payments are delinquent 120 days in personal loans and 180
days in credit cards and personal lines of credit. At December 31, 2018,
Oriental’s
originated non-performing consumer loans
amounted to $3.4 million (2.7% of Oriental’s non-performing loans), a 30.4%
increase from $2.6 million at December 31, 2017 (2.4% of Oriental’s
non-performing loans).
Auto loans and leases — are placed on non-accrual status when they become
90 days past due, partially written-off to collateral value when payments are delinquent
120 days, and fully written-off when payments are delinquent 180 days. At
December 31, 2018, Oriental’s originated non-performing auto loans and leases
amounted to $13.5 million (10.8% of Oriental’s total non-performing loans), an
increase of 218.9% from $4.2 million at December 31, 2017 (3.9% of Oriental’s
total non-performing loans), mainly due to higher balance in the portfolio.
Oriental has two mortgage loan
modification programs. These are the Loss Mitigation Program and the
Non-traditional Mortgage Loan Program. Both programs are intended to help
responsible homeowners to remain in their homes and avoid foreclosure, while
also reducing Oriental’s losses on non-performing mortgage loans.
The Loss Mitigation Program helps
mortgage borrowers who are or will become financially unable to meet the
current or scheduled mortgage payments. Loans that qualify under this program
are those guaranteed by FHA, VA, RURAL, PRHFA, conventional loans guaranteed by
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation (MGIC), conventional loans sold to FNMA
and FHLMC, and conventional loans retained by Oriental. The program offers
diversified alternatives such as regular or reduced payment plans, payment
moratorium, mortgage loan modification, partial claims (only FHA), short sale,
and payment in lieu of foreclosure.
The Non-traditional Mortgage Loan
Program is for non-traditional mortgages, including balloon payment, interest
only/interest first, variable interest rate, adjustable interest rate and other
qualified loans. Non-traditional mortgage loan portfolios are segregated into
the following categories: performing loans that meet secondary market
requirement and are refinanced under the credit underwriting guidelines of
FHA/VA/FNMA/ FHLMC, and performing loans not meeting secondary market
guidelines processed pursuant Oriental’s current credit and underwriting
guidelines. Oriental achieved an affordable and sustainable monthly payment by
taking specific, sequential, and necessary steps such as reducing the interest
rate, extending the loan term, capitalizing arrearages, deferring the payment
of principal or, if the borrower qualifies, refinancing the loan.
In order to apply for any of the loan
modification programs, if the borrower is active in Chapter 13 bankruptcy, it
must request an authorization from the bankruptcy trustee to allow for the loan
modification. Borrowers with discharged Chapter 7 bankruptcies may also
apply. Loans in these programs are evaluated by designated underwriters for
troubled-debt restructuring classification if Oriental grants a concession for
legal or economic reasons due to the debtor’s financial difficulties.
TABLE
8 — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES BREAKDOWN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Originated and other loans held for
investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
19,783
|
|
$
|
20,439
|
|
-3.2%
|
Commercial
|
|
30,326
|
|
|
30,258
|
|
0.2%
|
Consumer
|
|
15,571
|
|
|
16,454
|
|
-5.4%
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
29,508
|
|
|
25,567
|
|
15.4%
|
Total allowance
balance
|
$
|
95,188
|
|
$
|
92,718
|
|
2.7%
|
Allowance composition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
20.8%
|
|
|
22.0%
|
|
-5.7%
|
Commercial
|
|
31.9%
|
|
|
32.6%
|
|
-2.3%
|
Consumer
|
|
16.4%
|
|
|
17.8%
|
|
-7.8%
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
31.0%
|
|
|
27.6%
|
|
12.4%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
Allowance coverage ratio at end of
period applicable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
2.96%
|
|
|
2.99%
|
|
-1.0%
|
Commercial
|
|
1.90%
|
|
|
2.31%
|
|
-17.7%
|
Consumer
|
|
4.46%
|
|
|
4.99%
|
|
-10.6%
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
2.61%
|
|
|
2.89%
|
|
-9.7%
|
Total allowance to total
originated loans
|
|
2.54%
|
|
|
2.89%
|
|
-12.1%
|
Allowance coverage ratio to
non-performing loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
31.05%
|
|
|
31.89%
|
|
-2.6%
|
Commercial
|
|
71.43%
|
|
|
85.83%
|
|
-16.8%
|
Consumer
|
|
464.25%
|
|
|
639.74%
|
|
-27.4%
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
218.67%
|
|
|
604.14%
|
|
-63.8%
|
Total
|
|
77.38%
|
|
|
87.35%
|
|
-11.4%
|
TABLE 8 — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN
AND LEASE LOSSES BREAKDOWN (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for
under ASC 310-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
22
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
-47.6%
|
Consumer
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
3,225
|
|
-40.9%
|
Auto
|
|
135
|
|
|
595
|
|
-77.3%
|
Total allowance
balance
|
$
|
2,062
|
|
$
|
3,862
|
|
-46.6%
|
Allowance composition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
1.09%
|
|
-1.8%
|
Consumer
|
|
92.4%
|
|
|
83.50%
|
|
10.6%
|
Auto
|
|
6.6%
|
|
|
15.41%
|
|
-57.5%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
100.00%
|
|
|
Allowance coverage ratio at end of
period applicable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
0.86%
|
|
|
0.96%
|
|
-10.4%
|
Consumer
|
|
7.94%
|
|
|
11.15%
|
|
-28.8%
|
Auto
|
|
3.04%
|
|
|
2.71%
|
|
12.2%
|
Total allowance to total
acquired loans
|
|
6.66%
|
|
|
6.99%
|
|
-4.7%
|
Allowance coverage ratio to
non-performing loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
2.32%
|
|
|
3.31%
|
|
-29.9%
|
Consumer
|
|
478.64%
|
|
|
238.01%
|
|
101.1%
|
Auto
|
|
67.50%
|
|
|
332.40%
|
|
-79.7%
|
Total
|
|
133.20%
|
|
|
137.73%
|
|
-3.3%
|
TABLE 8 — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN
AND LEASE LOSSES BREAKDOWN (CONTINUED)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for
under ASC 310-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
15,225
|
|
$
|
14,085
|
|
8.1%
|
Commercial
|
|
20,641
|
|
|
23,691
|
|
-12.9%
|
Consumer
|
|
-
|
|
|
18
|
|
-100.0%
|
Auto
|
|
6,144
|
|
|
7,961
|
|
-22.8%
|
Total allowance
balance
|
$
|
42,010
|
|
$
|
45,755
|
|
-8.2%
|
Allowance composition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
36.2%
|
|
|
30.8%
|
|
17.7%
|
Commercial
|
|
49.1%
|
|
|
51.8%
|
|
-5.1%
|
Consumer
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
-100.0%
|
Auto
|
|
14.6%
|
|
|
17.4%
|
|
-15.9%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired Eurobank loans accounted for
under ASC 310-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
15,382
|
|
$
|
15,187
|
|
1.3%
|
Commercial
|
|
9,585
|
|
|
9,983
|
|
-4.0%
|
Consumer
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
0.0%
|
Total allowance
balance
|
$
|
24,971
|
|
$
|
25,174
|
|
-0.8%
|
Allowance composition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
61.6%
|
|
|
60.3%
|
|
2.1%
|
Commercial
|
|
38.4%
|
|
|
39.7%
|
|
-3.2%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
TABLE
9 — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
2016
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Originated and other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
92,718
|
|
$
|
59,300
|
|
56.4%
|
|
$
|
112,626
|
Provision for loan and lease
losses
|
|
52,061
|
|
|
79,885
|
|
-34.8%
|
|
|
45,058
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(72,393)
|
|
|
(61,856)
|
|
17.0%
|
|
|
(112,497)
|
Recoveries
|
|
22,802
|
|
|
15,389
|
|
48.2%
|
|
|
14,113
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
95,188
|
|
$
|
92,718
|
|
2.7%
|
|
$
|
59,300
|
Acquired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBVAPR loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired loans accounted for
under ASC 310-20:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
3,862
|
|
$
|
4,300
|
|
-10.2%
|
|
$
|
5,542
|
Provision (recapture) for loan and
lease losses
|
|
(297)
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
-116.1%
|
|
|
2,255
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(2,837)
|
|
|
(4,156)
|
|
-31.7%
|
|
|
(5,816)
|
Recoveries
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
-28.7%
|
|
|
2,319
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
2,062
|
|
$
|
3,862
|
|
-46.6%
|
|
$
|
4,300
|
Acquired loans accounted for
under ASC 310-30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
45,755
|
|
$
|
31,056
|
|
47.3%
|
|
$
|
25,785
|
Provision for loan and lease
losses
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
24,681
|
|
-92.8%
|
|
|
15,508
|
Loan pools fully charged off
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
(282)
|
Allowance de-recognition
|
|
(5,531)
|
|
|
(9,982)
|
|
-44.6%
|
|
|
(9,955)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
42,010
|
|
$
|
45,755
|
|
-8.2%
|
|
$
|
31,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eurobank loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
25,174
|
|
$
|
21,281
|
|
18.3%
|
|
$
|
90,178
|
Provision for loan and lease
losses
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
-61.8%
|
|
|
2,255
|
Loan pools fully charged off
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
(134)
|
FDIC shared-loss portion on
recapture of loan
and lease losses
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
3,391
|
Allowance de-recognition
|
|
(2,770)
|
|
|
(2,832)
|
|
-2.2%
|
|
|
(74,409)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
24,971
|
|
$
|
25,174
|
|
-0.8%
|
|
$
|
21,281
|
TABLE
10 — NET CREDIT LOSSES STATISTICS ON LOAN AND LEASES, EXCLUDING LOANS
ACCOUNTED FOR UNDER ASC 310-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Originated and other loans
and leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
$
|
(5,297)
|
|
$
|
(6,623)
|
|
-20.0%
|
|
$
|
|
(6,767)
|
Recoveries
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
585
|
|
79.0%
|
|
|
|
330
|
Total
|
|
(4,250)
|
|
|
(6,038)
|
|
-29.6%
|
|
|
|
(6,437)
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(6,782)
|
|
|
(7,684)
|
|
-11.7%
|
|
|
|
(62,445)
|
Recoveries
|
|
654
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
-48.9%
|
|
|
|
460
|
Total
|
|
(6,128)
|
|
|
(6,403)
|
|
-4.3%
|
|
|
|
(61,985)
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(17,629)
|
|
|
(13,641)
|
|
29.2%
|
|
|
|
(11,554)
|
Recoveries
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
45.3%
|
|
|
|
452
|
Total
|
|
(15,872)
|
|
|
(12,432)
|
|
27.7%
|
|
|
|
(11,102)
|
Auto
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(42,685)
|
|
|
(33,908)
|
|
25.9%
|
|
|
|
(31,731)
|
Recoveries
|
|
19,344
|
|
|
12,314
|
|
57.1%
|
|
|
|
12,871
|
Total
|
|
(23,341)
|
|
|
(21,594)
|
|
8.1%
|
|
|
|
(18,860)
|
Net credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
(72,393)
|
|
|
(61,856)
|
|
17.0%
|
|
|
|
(112,497)
|
Total recoveries
|
|
22,802
|
|
|
15,389
|
|
48.2%
|
|
|
|
14,113
|
Total
|
$
|
(49,591)
|
|
$
|
(46,467)
|
|
6.7%
|
$
|
|
|
(98,384)
|
Net credit losses to average
loans outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
0.62%
|
|
|
0.85%
|
|
-27.1%
|
|
|
|
0.87%
|
Commercial
|
|
0.42%
|
|
|
0.51%
|
|
-17.6%
|
|
|
|
4.47%
|
Consumer
|
|
4.50%
|
|
|
3.81%
|
|
18.2%
|
|
|
|
4.39%
|
Auto
|
|
2.27%
|
|
|
2.63%
|
|
-13.8%
|
|
|
|
2.63%
|
Total
|
|
1.41%
|
|
|
1.49%
|
|
-5.6%
|
|
|
|
3.18%
|
Recoveries to charge-offs
|
|
31.50%
|
|
|
24.88%
|
|
26.6%
|
|
|
|
12.55%
|
Average originated loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
683,228
|
|
|
709,933
|
|
-3.8%
|
|
|
|
754,732
|
Commercial
|
|
1,452,314
|
|
|
1,255,645
|
|
15.7%
|
|
|
|
1,388,424
|
Consumer
|
|
352,760
|
|
|
326,482
|
|
8.0%
|
|
|
|
286,489
|
Auto
|
|
1,029,039
|
|
|
819,863
|
|
25.5%
|
|
|
|
717,913
|
Total
|
$
|
3,517,341
|
|
$
|
3,111,923
|
|
13.0%
|
$
|
|
|
$3,147,558
|
TABLE 10 — NET CREDIT LOSSES STATISTICS
ON LOAN AND LEASES, EXCLUDING LOANS ACCOUNTED FOR UNDER ASC 310-30
(CONTINUED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
%
|
|
2016
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Acquired loans accounted for
under ASC 310-20:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
$
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
(132)
|
|
|
-95.5%
|
|
(42)
|
Recoveries
|
|
23
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
360.0%
|
|
73
|
Total
|
|
17
|
|
|
(127)
|
|
|
-113.4%
|
|
31
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(2,459)
|
|
|
(3,048)
|
|
|
-19.3%
|
|
(3,619)
|
Recoveries
|
|
480
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
7.6%
|
|
301
|
Total
|
|
(1,979)
|
|
|
(2,602)
|
|
|
-23.9%
|
|
(3,318)
|
Auto
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(372)
|
|
|
(976)
|
|
|
-61.9%
|
|
(2,155)
|
Recoveries
|
|
831
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
-41.5%
|
|
1,945
|
Total
|
|
459
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
3.4%
|
|
(210)
|
Net credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
(2,837)
|
|
|
(4,156)
|
|
|
-31.7%
|
|
(5,816)
|
Total recoveries
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
-28.7%
|
|
2,319
|
Total
|
$
|
(1,503)
|
|
$
|
(2,285)
|
|
|
-34.2%
|
|
(3,497)
|
Net credit losses to average
loans outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
-5.69%
|
|
|
32.82%
|
|
|
-117.3%
|
|
-5.78%
|
Consumer
|
|
3.66%
|
|
|
4.49%
|
|
|
-18.4%
|
|
5.55%
|
Auto
|
|
-2.14%
|
|
|
-1.15%
|
|
|
86.0%
|
|
0.28%
|
Total
|
|
1.98%
|
|
|
2.36%
|
|
|
-15.9%
|
|
2.60%
|
Recoveries to charge-offs
|
|
47.02%
|
|
|
45.02%
|
|
|
4.4%
|
|
39.87%
|
Average loans accounted for under ASC
310-20:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
-22.7%
|
|
536
|
Consumer
|
|
54,061
|
|
|
57,971
|
|
|
-6.7%
|
|
59,772
|
Auto
|
|
21,448
|
|
|
38,587
|
|
|
-44.4%
|
|
74,431
|
Total
|
$
|
75,808
|
|
$
|
96,945
|
|
|
-21.8%
|
|
134,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE
11 — NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Variance
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(%)
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Non-performing assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accruing loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled-Debt Restructuring
loans
|
$
|
41,679
|
|
$
|
25,354
|
|
64.4%
|
Other loans
|
|
78,047
|
|
|
74,360
|
|
5.0%
|
Accruing loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled-Debt Restructuring
loans
|
|
4,302
|
|
|
6,704
|
|
-35.8%
|
Other loans
|
|
541
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
-78.6%
|
Total non-performing loans
|
$
|
124,569
|
|
$
|
108,946
|
|
14.3%
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
33,768
|
|
|
44,174
|
|
-23.6%
|
Other repossessed assets
|
|
2,986
|
|
|
3,548
|
|
-15.8%
|
|
$
|
161,323
|
|
$
|
156,668
|
|
3.0%
|
Non-performing assets to total assets,
excluding acquired loans with deteriorated credit quality (including those by
analogy)
|
|
2.76%
|
|
|
2.95%
|
|
-6.4%
|
Non-performing assets to total capital
|
|
16.13%
|
|
|
16.58%
|
|
-2.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Interest that would have been recorded
in the period if the
loans had not been classified as
non-accruing loans
|
$
|
3,338
|
|
$
|
3,181
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE
12 — NON-PERFORMING LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Variance
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Non-performing loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated and other loans held for
investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
63,717
|
|
$
|
64,085
|
|
-0.6%
|
Commercial
|
|
42,456
|
|
|
35,253
|
|
20.4%
|
Consumer
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
30.4%
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
13,494
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
218.9%
|
|
|
123,021
|
|
|
106,142
|
|
15.9%
|
Acquired loans accounted for under
ASC 310-20 (Loans with
revolving feature and/or
acquired at a premium)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
950
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
-25.2%
|
Consumer
|
|
398
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
-70.6%
|
Auto
|
|
200
|
|
|
179
|
|
11.7%
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
-44.8%
|
Total
|
$
|
124,569
|
|
$
|
108,946
|
|
14.3%
|
Non-performing loans composition percentages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
51.1%
|
|
|
58.7%
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
34.1%
|
|
|
32.4%
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
2.7%
|
|
|
2.4%
|
|
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
10.8%
|
|
|
3.9%
|
|
|
Acquired loans accounted for under
ASC 310-20 (Loans with
revolving feature and/or
acquired at a premium)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
0.8%
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
0.3%
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
Auto
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
Total
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, excluding loans
accounted for
under ASC 310-30 (including
those by analogy)
|
|
3.30%
|
|
|
3.34%
|
|
-1.2%
|
Total assets, excluding loans
accounted for
under ASC 310-30 (including
those by analogy)
|
|
2.13%
|
|
|
2.05%
|
|
3.9%
|
Total capital
|
|
12.46%
|
|
|
11.53%
|
|
8.1%
|
Non-performing loans with partial
charge-offs to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, excluding loans
accounted for
under ASC 310-30 (including
those by analogy)
|
|
1.16%
|
|
|
1.15%
|
|
0.87%
|
Non-performing loans
|
|
35.30%
|
|
|
34.49%
|
|
2.3%
|
Other non-performing loans ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-off rate on non-performing
loans to non-performing loans
on which charge-offs have been
taken
|
|
59.20%
|
|
|
57.69%
|
|
2.6%
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
to non-performing
loans on which no charge-offs
have been taken
|
|
120.67%
|
|
|
134.26%
|
|
-10.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 13 - ACTIVITY OF FDIC
INDEMNIFICATION ASSET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
FDIC indemnification asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
14,411
|
$
|
|
22,599
|
Shared-loss agreements
reimbursements from the FDIC
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,573)
|
Increase in expected credit losses
to be
covered under shared-loss
agreements, net
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,391
|
FDIC indemnification asset benefit
(expense)
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
(8,040)
|
Net expenses incurred under
shared-loss agreements
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,966)
|
Shared-loss termination settlement
|
|
-
|
|
|
(15,814)
|
|
|
-
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
14,411
|
TABLE
14 - ACTIVITY IN THE REMAINING FDIC INDEMNIFICATION ASSET DISCOUNT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
8,670
|
|
$
|
4,814
|
Amortization of negative discount
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(8,040)
|
Impact of lower projected losses
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
11,896
|
Shared-loss termination
|
|
-
|
|
|
(8,670)
|
|
|
-
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
8,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE
15 - LIABILITIES SUMMARY AND COMPOSITION
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Variance
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
$
|
1,105,324
|
|
$
|
969,525
|
|
14.0%
|
NOW accounts
|
|
1,086,447
|
|
|
1,069,572
|
|
1.6%
|
Savings and money market accounts
|
|
1,212,260
|
|
|
1,251,396
|
|
-3.1%
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
1,501,002
|
|
|
1,507,101
|
|
-0.4%
|
Total deposits
|
|
4,905,033
|
|
|
4,797,594
|
|
2.2%
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
3,082
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
63.2%
|
Total deposits and accrued
interest payable
|
|
4,908,115
|
|
|
4,799,482
|
|
2.3%
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
|
455,508
|
|
|
192,869
|
|
136.2%
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
77,620
|
|
|
99,643
|
|
-22.1%
|
Subordinated capital notes
|
|
36,083
|
|
|
36,083
|
|
0.0%
|
Other term notes
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
153
|
|
693.5%
|
Total borrowings
|
|
570,425
|
|
|
328,748
|
|
73.5%
|
Total deposits and
borrowings
|
|
5,478,540
|
|
|
5,128,230
|
|
6.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
333
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
-74.0%
|
Acceptances outstanding
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
27,644
|
|
-38.7%
|
Other liabilities
|
|
87,665
|
|
|
86,791
|
|
1.0%
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
5,583,475
|
|
$
|
5,243,946
|
|
6.5%
|
Deposits portfolio composition
percentages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
22.5%
|
|
|
20.2%
|
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
22.1%
|
|
|
22.3%
|
|
|
Savings and money market accounts
|
|
24.7%
|
|
|
26.1%
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
30.7%
|
|
|
31.4%
|
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
Borrowings portfolio composition
percentages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
|
79.9%
|
|
|
58.7%
|
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
13.6%
|
|
|
30.3%
|
|
|
Other term notes
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
Subordinated capital notes
|
|
6.3%
|
|
|
11.0%
|
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase (excluding accrued interest)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount outstanding at period-end
|
$
|
454,723
|
|
$
|
192,500
|
|
|
Daily average outstanding balance
|
$
|
357,086
|
|
$
|
393,133
|
|
|
Maximum outstanding balance at any
month-end
|
$
|
457,053
|
|
$
|
606,210
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Funding Sources
As
shown in Table 15 above, at December
31, 2018, Oriental’s total liabilities were $5.583
billion, 6.5% more than the $5.244 billion reported at December 31, 2017. Deposits and borrowings, Oriental’s funding sources,
amounted to $5.479 billion at December 31, 2018
versus $5.128 billion at December 31, 2017, a 6.8%
increase.
Borrowings
consist mainly of repurchase agreements, FHLB-NY advances and subordinated
capital notes. At December
31, 2018, borrowings amounted to $570.4 million,
representing an increase of 73.5% when compared with the $328.7 million
reported at December 31, 2017. The increase in
borrowings reflects:
·
An increase of $262.2 million in new repurchase agreements used
for the purchase of investment securities during the year ended December 31,
2018; and
·
A decrease of $21.9 million in advances from the FHLB-NY
attributable to $68.1 million of new advances, offset by the maturing of $90.0
million of advances that were not renewed.
At December
31, 2018, deposits
represented 88% and borrowings represented 12% of interest-bearing liabilities.
At December 31, 2018, deposits, the largest
category of Oriental’s interest-bearing liabilities, were $4.908 billion, an
increase of 2.3% from $4.798 billion at December
31, 2017.
Stockholders’ Equity
At December
31, 2018,
Oriental’s total stockholders’ equity was $999.9 million, a 5.8% increase when
compared to $945.1 million at December
31, 2017. This
increase in stockholders’ equity reflects increases in retained earnings of $52.2
million, legal surplus of $8.7 million, reduction in treasury stock, at cost,
of $869 thousand, partially offset by a decrease in accumulated other
comprehensive loss, net of tax of $8.0 million. Book value per share was $17.90
at December 31, 2018 compared to $17.73 at December 31, 2017.
From
December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018,
tangible common equity to total assets increased from 11.12% to 12.59%, leverage
capital ratio increased from 13.92% to 14.22%, common equity tier 1 capital
ratio increased from 14.59% to 16.78%, tier 1 risk-based capital ratio increased
from 19.05% to 19.20%, and total risk-based capital ratio increased from 20.34%
to 20.48%. The increase in these ratios reflect an increase of $54.8 million in
total capital.
On October 22, 2018, Oriental
announced the mandatory conversion of its Series C Preferred Stock into common
stock. Each share of Series C Preferred Stock was converted into 86.4225 shares
of common stock. There were 84,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock
outstanding, all of which were converted to common. Upon conversion, the
Series C Preferred Stock is no longer outstanding and all rights with respect
to the Series C Preferred Stock have ceased and terminated, except the right to
receive the number of whole shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of
the Series C Preferred Stock and any required cash-in-lieu of fractional
shares.
Capital
Rules to Implement Basel III Capital Requirements
Oriental
and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements established by the
Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC. The current risk-based capital standards
applicable to Oriental and the Bank (“Basel III capital rules”), which have
been effective since January 1, 2015, are based on the final capital framework
for strengthening international capital standards, known as Basel III, of the
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. As of December 31, 2018, the capital
ratios of Oriental and the Bank continue to exceed the minimum requirements for
being “well-capitalized” under the Basel III capital rules.
The
risk-based capital ratios presented in Table 14, which include common equity
tier 1, tier 1 capital, total capital and leverage capital as of December 31,
2018 and December 31, 2017, are calculated based on the Basel III capital rules
related to the measurement of capital, risk-weighted assets and average assets.
The following are the consolidated capital
ratios of Oriental under the Basel III capital rules at December 31, 2018 and December
31, 2017:
TABLE 16 — CAPITAL, DIVIDENDS AND STOCK
DATA
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Variance
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Capital data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
999,877
|
|
$
|
945,107
|
|
5.8%
|
Regulatory Capital Ratios data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio
|
|
16.78%
|
|
|
14.59%
|
|
15.0%
|
Minimum common equity tier 1 capital
ratio required
|
|
4.50%
|
|
|
4.50%
|
|
0.0%
|
Actual common equity tier 1 capital
|
$
|
811,707
|
|
|
644,804
|
|
25.9%
|
Minimum common equity tier 1 capital
required
|
$
|
217,675
|
|
|
198,930
|
|
9.4%
|
Minimum capital conservation buffer
required
|
$
|
90,698
|
|
|
55,258
|
|
64.1%
|
Excess over regulatory requirement
|
$
|
503,334
|
|
|
390,615
|
|
28.9%
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
4,837,214
|
|
|
4,420,667
|
|
9.4%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
|
|
19.20%
|
|
|
19.05%
|
|
0.8%
|
Minimum tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio required
|
|
6.00%
|
|
|
6.00%
|
|
0.0%
|
Actual tier 1 risk-based capital
|
$
|
928,577
|
|
$
|
842,133
|
|
10.3%
|
Minimum tier 1 risk-based capital
required
|
$
|
290,233
|
|
$
|
265,240
|
|
9.4%
|
Excess over regulatory requirement
|
$
|
638,344
|
|
$
|
576,893
|
|
10.7%
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
4,837,214
|
|
$
|
4,420,667
|
|
9.4%
|
Total risk-based capital ratio
|
|
20.48%
|
|
|
20.34%
|
|
0.7%
|
Minimum total risk-based capital
ratio required
|
|
8.00%
|
|
|
8.00%
|
|
0.0%
|
Actual total risk-based capital
|
$
|
990,499
|
|
$
|
899,258
|
|
10.1%
|
Minimum total risk-based capital
required
|
$
|
386,977
|
|
$
|
353,653
|
|
9.4%
|
Excess over regulatory requirement
|
$
|
603,522
|
|
$
|
545,604
|
|
10.6%
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
4,837,214
|
|
$
|
4,420,667
|
|
9.4%
|
Leverage capital ratio
|
|
14.22%
|
|
|
13.92%
|
|
2.2%
|
Minimum leverage capital ratio
required
|
|
4.00%
|
|
|
4.00%
|
|
0.0%
|
Actual tier 1 capital
|
$
|
928,577
|
|
$
|
842,133
|
|
10.3%
|
Minimum tier 1 capital required
|
$
|
261,125
|
|
$
|
242,057
|
|
7.9%
|
Excess over regulatory requirement
|
$
|
667,452
|
|
$
|
600,076
|
|
11.2%
|
Tangible common equity to total
assets
|
|
12.59%
|
|
|
11.12%
|
|
13.2%
|
Tangible common equity to
risk-weighted assets
|
|
17.13%
|
|
|
15.57%
|
|
10.0%
|
Total equity to total assets
|
|
15.19%
|
|
|
15.27%
|
|
-0.5%
|
Total equity to risk-weighted assets
|
|
20.67%
|
|
|
21.38%
|
|
-3.3%
|
Stock data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding common shares
|
|
51,293,924
|
|
|
43,947,442
|
|
16.7%
|
Book value per common share
|
$
|
17.90
|
|
$
|
17.73
|
|
0.9%
|
Tangible book value per common share
|
$
|
16.15
|
|
$
|
15.67
|
|
3.1%
|
Market price at end of period
|
$
|
16.46
|
|
$
|
9.40
|
|
75.1%
|
Market capitalization at end of
period
|
$
|
844,298
|
|
$
|
413,106
|
|
104.4%
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
2016
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Common dividend data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
$
|
11,511
|
|
$
|
10,553
|
|
9.1%
|
|
$
|
10,544
|
Cash dividends declared per share
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
4.2%
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
Payout ratio
|
|
16.45%
|
|
|
27.91%
|
|
-41.1%
|
|
|
23.30%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
1.52%
|
|
|
2.55%
|
|
-40.4%
|
|
|
1.83%
|
The
following table presents a reconciliation of Oriental’s total stockholders’
equity to tangible common equity and total assets to tangible assets at
December 31, 2018, and 2017:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands, except share or per
share
information)
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
$
|
999,877
|
|
$
|
945,107
|
Preferred stock
|
|
(92,000)
|
|
|
(176,000)
|
Preferred stock issuance costs
|
|
10,130
|
|
|
10,130
|
Goodwill
|
|
(86,069)
|
|
|
(86,069)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
(2,480)
|
|
|
(3,339)
|
Customer relationship intangible
|
|
(888)
|
|
|
(1,348)
|
Total tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
|
$
|
828,570
|
|
$
|
688,481
|
Total assets
|
|
6,583,352
|
|
|
6,189,053
|
Goodwill
|
|
(86,069)
|
|
|
(86,069)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
(2,480)
|
|
|
(3,339)
|
Customer relationship intangible
|
|
(888)
|
|
|
(1,348)
|
Total tangible assets
|
$
|
6,493,915
|
|
$
|
6,098,297
|
Tangible common equity to tangible
assets
|
|
12.76%
|
|
|
11.29%
|
Common shares outstanding at end of
period
|
|
51,293,924
|
|
|
43,947,442
|
Tangible book value per common share
|
$
|
16.15
|
|
$
|
15.67
|
The tangible common equity
ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP measures and,
unlike tier 1 capital and common equity tier 1 capital, are not codified in the
federal banking regulations. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible
common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share in conjunction
with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of
banking organizations. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or
related measures should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
stockholders’ equity, total assets or any other measure calculated in
accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which Oriental calculates its
tangible common equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may
differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names.
Non-GAAP financial measures
have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are
not audited. To mitigate these limitations, Oriental has procedures in place to
calculate these measures using the appropriate GAAP or regulatory components.
Although these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders
in the evaluation of a company, they have limitations as analytical tools and
should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of
results as reported under GAAP.
The following table presents Oriental’s capital
adequacy information under the Basel III capital rules:
|
December 31,
|
|
Variance
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Risk-based capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity tier 1 capital
|
$
|
811,707
|
|
$
|
644,804
|
|
25.9%
|
Additional tier 1 capital
|
|
116,870
|
|
|
197,329
|
|
-40.8%
|
Tier 1 capital
|
|
928,577
|
|
|
842,133
|
|
10.3%
|
Additional Tier 2 capital
|
|
61,922
|
|
|
57,125
|
|
8.4%
|
Total risk-based capital
|
$
|
990,499
|
|
$
|
899,258
|
|
10.1%
|
Risk-weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet items
|
$
|
4,641,998
|
|
$
|
4,249,042
|
|
9.2%
|
Off-balance sheet items
|
|
195,216
|
|
|
171,625
|
|
13.7%
|
Total risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
4,837,214
|
|
$
|
4,420,667
|
|
9.4%
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity tier 1 capital
(minimum required - 4.5%)
|
|
16.78%
|
|
|
14.59%
|
|
15.0%
|
Tier 1 capital (minimum required -
6%)
|
|
19.20%
|
|
|
19.05%
|
|
0.8%
|
Total capital (minimum required -
8%)
|
|
20.48%
|
|
|
20.34%
|
|
0.7%
|
Leverage ratio (minimum required -
4%)
|
|
14.22%
|
|
|
13.92%
|
|
2.2%
|
Equity to assets
|
|
15.19%
|
|
|
15.27%
|
|
-0.5%
|
Tangible common equity to assets
|
|
12.59%
|
|
|
11.12%
|
|
13.2%
|
The Bank is considered “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework
for prompt corrective action. The table below shows the Bank’s regulatory
capital ratios at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Variance
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
%
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Oriental Bank Regulatory Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital to
Risk-Weighted Assets
|
|
18.40%
|
|
|
18.63%
|
|
-1.2%
|
Actual common equity tier 1 capital
|
$
|
887,918
|
|
$
|
822,776
|
|
7.9%
|
Minimum capital requirement (4.5%)
|
$
|
217,120
|
|
$
|
198,712
|
|
9.3%
|
Minimum capital conservation buffer
requirement (1.875% at December 31, 2018 - 1.25% at December 31, 2017)
|
$
|
90,467
|
|
$
|
55,198
|
|
63.9%
|
Minimum to be well capitalized
(6.5%)
|
$
|
313,618
|
|
$
|
287,028
|
|
9.3%
|
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted
Assets
|
|
18.40%
|
|
|
18.63%
|
|
-1.2%
|
Actual tier 1 risk-based capital
|
$
|
887,918
|
|
$
|
822,776
|
|
7.9%
|
Minimum capital requirement (6%)
|
$
|
289,494
|
|
$
|
264,949
|
|
9.3%
|
Minimum to be well capitalized (8%)
|
$
|
385,992
|
|
$
|
353,265
|
|
9.3%
|
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted
Assets
|
|
19.68%
|
|
|
19.92%
|
|
-1.2%
|
Actual total risk-based capital
|
$
|
949,596
|
|
$
|
879,648
|
|
8.0%
|
Minimum capital requirement (8%)
|
$
|
385,992
|
|
$
|
353,265
|
|
9.3%
|
Minimum to be well capitalized (10%)
|
$
|
482,490
|
|
$
|
441,581
|
|
9.3%
|
Total Tier 1 Capital to Average
Total Assets
|
|
13.68%
|
|
|
13.63%
|
|
0.4%
|
Actual tier 1 capital
|
$
|
887,918
|
|
$
|
822,776
|
|
7.9%
|
Minimum capital requirement (4%)
|
$
|
259,547
|
|
$
|
241,417
|
|
7.5%
|
Minimum to be well capitalized (5%)
|
$
|
324,434
|
|
$
|
301,771
|
|
7.5%
|
Oriental’s
common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol
“OFG.” At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Oriental’s market capitalization for its
outstanding common stock was $844.3 million ($16.46 per share) and $413.1
million ($9.40 per share), respectively.
The following table provides the high and low prices and dividends
per share of Oriental’s common stock for each quarter of the last three
calendar years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
Price
|
|
Dividend
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Per share
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
$
|
18.56
|
|
$
|
14.93
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
September 30, 2018
|
$
|
17.60
|
|
$
|
14.45
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
June 30, 2018
|
$
|
14.75
|
|
$
|
10.60
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
March 31, 2018
|
$
|
12.05
|
|
$
|
8.60
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
$
|
10.25
|
|
$
|
7.90
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
September 30, 2017
|
$
|
10.40
|
|
$
|
8.40
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
June 30, 2017
|
$
|
12.03
|
|
$
|
9.19
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
March 31, 2017
|
$
|
13.80
|
|
$
|
10.90
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
$
|
14.30
|
|
$
|
9.56
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
September 30, 2016
|
$
|
11.09
|
|
$
|
8.07
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
June 30, 2016
|
$
|
9.14
|
|
$
|
6.32
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
March 31, 2016
|
$
|
7.32
|
|
$
|
4.77
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Oriental’s current stock repurchase program, it is
authorized to purchase in the open market up to $7.7 million of its outstanding
shares of common stock. The shares of common stock repurchased are to be held
by Oriental as treasury shares. There were no repurchases during 2018.
At
December 31, 2018, the number of shares that may yet be purchased under such
program is estimated at 469,675
and was
calculated by dividing the remaining balance of $7.7 million by $16.46 (closing price of Oriental's common stock
at December 31, 2018).
Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments
As disclosed in the notes to the consolidated
financial statements, Oriental has certain obligations and commitments to make
future payments under contracts. At December 31, 2018, the aggregate contractual obligations
and commercial commitments, excluding accrued interest and unamortized premiums
(discounts), are as follows:
|
Payments Due
by Period
|
|
Total
|
|
Less than 1
year
|
|
1 - 3 years
|
|
3 - 5 years
|
|
After 5 years
|
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS:
|
(In thousands)
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
$
|
454,723
|
|
$
|
264,723
|
|
$
|
190,000
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
77,444
|
|
|
33,572
|
|
|
8,867
|
|
|
35,005
|
|
|
-
|
Subordinated capital notes
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
35,000
|
Annual rental commitments under
noncancelable
operating leases
|
|
24,412
|
|
|
5,618
|
|
|
7,653
|
|
|
11,141
|
|
|
-
|
Certificates of deposits
|
|
1,501,004
|
|
|
850,451
|
|
|
573,537
|
|
|
77,016
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
$
|
2,092,583
|
|
$
|
1,154,364
|
|
$
|
780,057
|
|
$
|
123,162
|
|
$
|
35,000
|
Loan commitments, which represent unused lines of
credit, increased to $541.4 million at December 31, 2018 as compared to
$485.0 million in December 31, 2017, while letters of credit provided to
customers, decreased to $340 thousand as compared to $494 thousand at December
31, 2017. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as
long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.
Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates, bear variable interest rate
and may require payment of a fee. Since the commitments may expire unexercised,
the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. Oriental evaluates each customer’s credit-worthiness on a
case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by Oriental
upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the
customer.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The
financial statements and related data presented herein (except for certain
non-GAAP measures as previously indicated) have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP which require the measurement of financial position and operating
results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the
relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.
Unlike most
industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a
financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have
a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the
effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move
in the same direction or with the same magnitude as the prices of goods and
services since such prices are affected by inflation.
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
The following is a summary of the
quarterly results of operations:
TABLE 17 —
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Total
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
EARNINGS
DATA:
|
(In thousands, except per
share data)
|
Interest
income
|
$
|
83,170
|
|
$
|
88,006
|
|
$
|
94,137
|
|
$
|
95,106
|
|
$
|
360,419
|
Interest
expense
|
|
9,176
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
|
11,860
|
|
|
13,071
|
|
|
44,525
|
Net interest income
|
|
73,994
|
|
|
77,588
|
|
|
82,277
|
|
|
82,035
|
|
|
315,894
|
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
|
15,460
|
|
|
14,747
|
|
|
14,601
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
56,108
|
Net interest income after provision for loan
and lease losses
|
|
58,534
|
|
|
62,841
|
|
|
67,676
|
|
|
70,735
|
|
|
259,786
|
Non-interest
income
|
|
18,514
|
|
|
18,703
|
|
|
18,620
|
|
|
24,258
|
|
|
80,095
|
Non-interest
expenses
|
|
52,121
|
|
|
52,300
|
|
|
50,941
|
|
|
51,719
|
|
|
207,081
|
Income before taxes
|
|
24,927
|
|
|
29,244
|
|
|
35,355
|
|
|
43,274
|
|
|
132,800
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
8,010
|
|
|
9,595
|
|
|
12,255
|
|
|
18,530
|
|
|
48,390
|
Net income
|
|
16,917
|
|
|
19,649
|
|
|
23,100
|
|
|
24,744
|
|
|
84,410
|
Less:
dividends on preferred stock
|
|
(3,465)
|
|
|
(3,465)
|
|
|
(3,466)
|
|
|
(1,628)
|
|
|
(12,024)
|
Income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
13,452
|
|
$
|
16,184
|
|
$
|
19,634
|
|
$
|
23,116
|
|
$
|
72,386
|
PER
SHARE DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
$
|
1.58
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Total
|
|
2017
|
|
2017
|
|
2017
|
|
2017
|
|
2017
|
EARNINGS
DATA:
|
(In thousands, except per
share data)
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
$
|
86,178
|
|
$
|
85,940
|
|
$
|
90,355
|
|
$
|
83,174
|
|
$
|
345,647
|
Interest
expense
|
|
11,560
|
|
|
10,377
|
|
|
9,877
|
|
|
9,661
|
|
|
41,475
|
Net interest income
|
|
74,618
|
|
|
75,563
|
|
|
80,478
|
|
|
73,513
|
|
|
304,172
|
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
|
17,654
|
|
|
26,536
|
|
|
44,042
|
|
|
24,907
|
|
|
113,139
|
Net interest income after provision for loan
and lease losses
|
|
56,964
|
|
|
49,027
|
|
|
36,436
|
|
|
48,606
|
|
|
191,033
|
Non-interest
income
|
|
19,074
|
|
|
24,886
|
|
|
17,912
|
|
|
16,815
|
|
|
78,687
|
Non-interest
expenses
|
|
51,684
|
|
|
52,816
|
|
|
50,469
|
|
|
46,662
|
|
|
201,631
|
(Loss) income before taxes
|
|
24,354
|
|
|
21,097
|
|
|
3,879
|
|
|
18,759
|
|
|
68,089
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
9,204
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
15,443
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
15,150
|
|
|
17,104
|
|
|
3,319
|
|
|
17,073
|
|
|
52,646
|
Less:
dividends on preferred stock
|
|
(3,465)
|
|
|
(3,466)
|
|
|
(3,465)
|
|
|
(3,466)
|
|
|
(13,862)
|
(Loss) income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
11,685
|
|
$
|
13,638
|
|
$
|
(146)
|
|
$
|
13,607
|
|
$
|
38,784
|
PER
SHARE DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
Diluted
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
Background
Oriental’s risk
management policies are established by its Board of Directors (the “Board”) and
implemented by management through the adoption of a risk management program,
which is overseen and monitored by the Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, the Board’s
Risk and Compliance Committee and the executive Risk and Compliance Team. Oriental
has continued to refine and enhance its risk management program by
strengthening policies, processes and procedures necessary to maintain
effective risk management.
All aspects of Oriental’s
business activities are susceptible to risk. Consequently, risk identification
and monitoring are essential to risk management. As more fully discussed below,
Oriental’s primary risk exposures include, market, interest rate, credit,
liquidity, operational and concentration risks.
Market Risk
Market risk is the
risk to earnings or capital arising from adverse movements in market rates or
prices, such as interest rates or prices. Oriental evaluates market risk
together with interest rate risk. Oriental’s financial results and capital
levels are constantly exposed to market risk. The Board and management are
primarily responsible for ensuring that the market risk assumed by Oriental
complies with the guidelines established by policies approved by the Board. The
Board has delegated the management of this risk to the Asset/Liability
Management Committee (“ALCO”) which is composed of certain executive officers
from the business, treasury and finance areas. One of ALCO’s primary goals is
to ensure that the market risk assumed by Oriental is within the parameters
established in such policies.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk
is the exposure of Oriental’s earnings or capital to adverse movements in
interest rates. It is a predominant market risk in terms of its potential
impact on earnings. Oriental manages its asset/liability position in order to
limit the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income. ALCO
oversees interest rate risk, liquidity management and other related matters.
In executing its
responsibilities, ALCO examines current and expected conditions in global
financial markets, competition and prevailing rates in the local deposit
market, liquidity, unrealized gains and losses in securities, recent or
proposed changes to the investment portfolio, alternative funding sources and
their costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives such as swaps,
and any tax or regulatory issues which may be pertinent to these areas.
On a quarterly
basis, Oriental performs a net interest income simulation analysis on a
consolidated basis to estimate the potential change in future earnings from
projected changes in interest rates. These simulations are carried out over a
five-year time horizon, assuming certain gradual upward and downward interest
rate movements, achieved during a twelve-month period. Instantaneous interest
rate movements are also modeled. Simulations are carried out in two ways:
(i)
using a static balance
sheet as Oriental had on the simulation date, and
(ii)
using a dynamic balance
sheet based on recent growth patterns and business strategies.
The balance sheet
is divided into groups of assets and liabilities detailed by maturity or re-pricing
and their corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates rise or
fall, these simulations incorporate expected future lending rates, current and
expected future funding sources and costs, the possible exercise of options,
changes in prepayment rates, deposits decay and other factors which may be
important in projecting the future growth of net interest income.
Oriental uses a
software application to project future movements in Oriental’s balance sheet
and income statement. The starting point of the projections generally
corresponds to the actual values of the balance sheet on the date of the
simulations.
These simulations are complex,
and use many assumptions that are intended to reflect the general behavior of Oriental
over the period in question. There can be no assurance that actual events will
match these assumptions in all cases. For this reason, the results of these
simulations are only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest
income to changes in market interest rates. The following table presents the
results of the simulations at December 31, 2018 for the most likely scenario,
assuming a one-year time horizon:
|
Net Interest
Income Risk (one-year projection)
|
|
Static
Balance Sheet
|
|
Growing
Simulation
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
Change in interest rate
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
+ 200 Basis points
|
$
|
11,424
|
|
3.63%
|
|
$
|
12,683
|
|
3.99%
|
+ 100 Basis points
|
$
|
5,750
|
|
1.83%
|
|
$
|
6,381
|
|
2.01%
|
- 100 Basis points
|
$
|
(5,643)
|
|
-1.79%
|
|
$
|
(6,271)
|
|
-1.97%
|
- 200 Basis points
|
$
|
(11,330)
|
|
-3.60%
|
|
$
|
(12,584)
|
|
-3.96%
|
Future net
interest income could be affected by Oriental’s investments in callable
securities, prepayment risk related to mortgage loans and mortgage-backed
securities, and any structured repurchase agreements and advances from the
FHLB-NY in which it may enter into from time to time. As part of the strategy
to limit the interest rate risk and reduce the re-pricing gaps of Oriental’s
assets and liabilities, Oriental has executed certain transactions which
include extending the maturity and the re-pricing frequency of the liabilities
to longer terms reducing the amounts of its structured repurchase agreements
and entering into hedge-designated swaps to hedge the variability of future
interest cash flows of forecasted wholesale borrowings that only consist of
advances from the FHLB-NY as of December 31, 2018.
Oriental maintains
an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the use of
derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in
earnings that are caused by interest rate volatility. Oriental’s goal is to
manage interest rate sensitivity by modifying the repricing or maturity
characteristics of certain balance sheet assets and liabilities so that the net
interest margin is not, on a material basis, adversely affected by movements in
interest rates. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged fixed-rate
assets and liabilities will appreciate or depreciate in market value. Also, for
some fixed-rate assets or liabilities, the effect of this variability in
earnings is expected to be substantially offset by Oriental’s gains and losses
on the derivative instruments that are linked to the forecasted cash flows of
these hedged assets and liabilities. Oriental considers its strategic use of
derivatives to be a prudent method of managing interest-rate sensitivity as it
reduces the exposure of earnings and the market value of its equity to undue
risk posed by changes in interest rates. The effect of this unrealized
appreciation or depreciation is expected to be substantially offset by
Oriental’s gains or losses on the derivative instruments that are linked to
these hedged assets and liabilities. Another result of interest rate
fluctuation is that the contractual interest income and interest expense of
hedged variable-rate assets and liabilities, respectively, will increase or
decrease.
Derivative
instruments that are used as part of Oriental’s interest risk management
strategy include interest rate swaps, forward-settlement swaps, futures
contracts, and option contracts that have indices related to the pricing of
specific balance sheet assets and liabilities. Interest rate swaps generally
involve the exchange of fixed and variable-rate interest payments between two
parties based on a common notional principal amount and maturity date. Interest
rate futures generally involve exchanged-traded contracts to buy or sell U.S.
Treasury bonds and notes in the future at specified prices. Interest rate
options represent contracts that allow the holder of the option to (i) receive
cash or (ii) purchase, sell, or enter into a financial instrument at a
specified price within a specified period. Some purchased option contracts give
Oriental the right to enter into interest rate swaps and cap and floor
agreements with the writer of the option. In addition, Oriental enters into
certain transactions that contain embedded derivatives. When the embedded
derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely
related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, it is bifurcated
and carried at fair value. Please refer to Note 12 to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements for further information concerning Oriental’s
derivative activities.
Following is a summary of certain strategies, including derivative
activities, currently used by Oriental to manage interest rate risk:
Interest rate
swaps — Oriental entered
into hedge-designated swaps to hedge the variability of future interest cash
flows of forecasted wholesale borrowings attributable to changes in the
one-month LIBOR rate. Once the forecasted wholesale borrowing transactions
occurred, the interest rate swap effectively fixes Oriental’s interest payments
on an amount of forecasted interest expense attributable to the one-month LIBOR
rate corresponding to the swap notional stated rate. A derivative asset of $14 thousand
(notional amount of $34.0 million) was recognized at December 31, 2018 related
to the valuation of these swaps.
In addition, Oriental has certain
derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps not designated as hedging
instruments, which are utilized to convert certain variable-rate loans to
fixed-rate loans, and the mirror-images of these interest rate swaps in which
Oriental enters into to minimize its interest rate risk exposure that results
from offering the derivatives to clients. These interest rate swaps are marked
to market through earnings. At December 31, 2018, interest rate swaps offered
to clients not designated as hedging instruments represented a derivative asset
of $126 thousand (notional amounts of $12.5 million), and the mirror-image
interest rate swaps in which Oriental entered into represented a derivative liability
of $126 thousand (notional amounts of $12.5 million).
Wholesale
borrowings — Oriental uses
interest rate swaps to hedge the variability of interest cash flows of certain
advances from the FHLB-NY that are tied to a variable rate index. The interest
rate swaps effectively fix Oriental’s interest payments on these borrowings. As
of December 31, 2018, Oriental had $34.0 million in interest rate swaps at an
average rate of 2.4% designated as cash flow hedges for $34.0 million in
advances from the FHLB-NY that reprice or are being rolled over on a monthly
basis.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the
possibility of loss arising from a borrower or counterparty in a credit-related
contract failing to perform in accordance with its terms. The principal source
of credit risk for Oriental is its lending activities. In Puerto Rico,
Oriental’s principal market, economic conditions are very challenging, as they
have been for the last twelve years, due to a shrinking population, a
protracted economic recession, a housing sector that remains under pressure,
the Puerto Rico government’s fiscal and liquidity crisis, and the payment
defaults on various Puerto Rico government bonds, with severe austerity
measures expected for the Puerto Rico government to be able to restructure its
debts under the supervision of the federally-created Fiscal Oversight and Management
Board for Puerto Rico. In addition, as was demonstrated with hurricanes Irma
and Maria during the month of September 2017, Puerto Rico is susceptible to
natural disasters, such as hurricanes and earthquakes, which can have a
disproportionate impact on Puerto Rico because of the logistical difficulties
of bringing relief to an island far from the United States mainland. Moreover,
the Puerto Rico government's fiscal challenges and Puerto Rico's unique
relationship with the United States also complicate any relief efforts after a
natural disaster. These events increase credit risk as debtors may no longer be
capable of operating their businesses and the collateral securing Oriental's
loans may suffer significant damages.
Oriental manages
its credit risk through a comprehensive credit policy which establishes sound
underwriting standards by monitoring and evaluating loan portfolio quality, and
by the constant assessment of reserves and loan concentrations. Oriental also
employs proactive collection and loss mitigation practices.
Oriental may also
encounter risk of default in relation to its securities portfolio. The
securities held by Oriental are all agency mortgage-backed securities. Thus,
these instruments are guaranteed by mortgages, a U.S. government-sponsored
entity, or the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
Oriental’s
executive Credit Risk Team, composed of its Chief Operating Officer, Chief Risk
and Compliance Officer, and other senior executives, has primary responsibility
for setting strategies to achieve Oriental’s credit risk goals and objectives.
Those goals and objectives are set forth in Oriental’s Credit Policy as
approved by the Board.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is
the risk of Oriental not being able to generate sufficient cash from either
assets or liabilities to meet obligations as they become due without incurring
substantial losses. The Board has established a policy to manage this risk.
Oriental’s cash requirements principally consist of deposit withdrawals, contractual
loan funding, repayment of borrowings as these mature, and funding of new and
existing investments as required.
Oriental’s
business requires continuous access to various funding sources. While Oriental
is able to fund its operations through deposits as well as through advances
from the FHLB-NY and other alternative sources, Oriental’s business is
dependent upon other external wholesale funding sources. Oriental has selectively reduced its use of certain
wholesale funding sources, such as repurchase agreements and brokered deposits.
As of December 31, 2018, Oriental had $454.7 million in repurchase
agreements, excluding accrued interest, and $525.1 million in brokered
deposits.
Brokered deposits
are typically offered through an intermediary to small retail investors.
Oriental’s ability to continue to attract brokered deposits is subject to
variability based upon a number of factors, including volume and volatility in
the global securities markets, Oriental’s credit rating, and the relative interest
rates that it is prepared to pay for these liabilities. Brokered deposits are
generally considered a less stable source of funding than core deposits
obtained through retail bank branches. Investors in brokered deposits are
generally more sensitive to interest rates and will generally move funds from
one depository institution to another based on small differences in interest
rates offered on deposits.
Although Oriental
expects to have continued access to credit from the foregoing sources of funds,
there can be no assurance that such financing sources will continue to be
available or will be available on favorable terms. In a period of financial
disruption or if negative developments occur with respect to Oriental, the
availability and cost of Oriental’s funding sources could be adversely
affected. In that event, Oriental’s cost of funds may increase, thereby
reducing its net interest income, or Oriental may need to dispose of a portion
of its investment portfolio, which depending upon market conditions, could
result in realizing a loss or experiencing other adverse accounting
consequences upon any such dispositions. Oriental’s efforts to monitor and
manage liquidity risk may not be successful to deal with dramatic or
unanticipated changes in the global securities markets or other reductions in
liquidity driven by Oriental or market-related events. In the event that such
sources of funds are reduced or eliminated, and Oriental is not able to replace
these on a cost-effective basis, Oriental may be forced to curtail or cease its
loan origination business and treasury activities, which would have a material
adverse effect on its operations and financial condition.
As of December 31,
2018, Oriental had approximately $447.0 million in unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents, $637.5 million in investment securities that are not pledged as
collateral, and $762.0 million in borrowing capacity at the FHLB-NY.
Operational Risk
Operational risk
is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, personnel and
systems or from external events. All functions, products and services of
Oriental are susceptible to operational risk.
Oriental faces
ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the activities
that surround the delivery of banking and financial products and services.
Coupled with external influences such as the risk of natural disasters, market
conditions, security risks, and legal risks, the potential for operational and
reputational loss has increased. In order to mitigate and control operational
risk, Oriental has developed, and continues to enhance, specific internal
controls, policies and procedures that are designed to identify and manage
operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. The purpose
of these policies and procedures is to provide reasonable assurance that
Oriental’s business operations are functioning within established limits.
Oriental
classifies operational risk into two major categories: business specific and
corporate-wide affecting all business lines. For business specific risks, a
risk assessment group works with the various business units to ensure
consistency in policies, processes and assessments. With respect to
corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business recovery, legal
and compliance, Oriental has specialized groups, such as Information Security,
Enterprise Risk Management, Corporate Compliance, Information Technology, Legal
and Operations. These groups assist the lines of business in the development
and implementation of risk management practices specific to the needs of the
business groups. All these matters are reviewed and discussed in the executive
Risk and Compliance Team. Oriental also has a Business Continuity Plan to
address situations where its capacity to perform critical functions is
affected. Under such circumstances, a Crisis Management Team is activated to
restore such critical functions within established timeframes.
Oriental is subject to extensive United States federal and Puerto Rico
regulations, and this regulatory scrutiny has been significantly increasing
over the last several years. Oriental has established and continues to enhance
procedures based on legal and regulatory requirements that are reasonably
designed to ensure compliance with all applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements. Oriental has a corporate compliance function headed by a Chief Risk
and Compliance Officer who reports to the Chief Executive Officer and
supervises the BSA Officer and Regulatory Compliance Officer. The Chief Risk
and Compliance Officer is responsible for the oversight of regulatory
compliance and implementation of a company-wide compliance program, including
the Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering compliance program.
Concentration Risk
Substantially all
of Oriental’s business activities and a significant portion of its credit
exposure are concentrated in Puerto Rico. As a consequence, Oriental’s
profitability and financial condition may be adversely affected by an extended
economic slowdown, adverse political, fiscal or economic developments in Puerto
Rico or the effects of a natural disaster, all of which could result in a
reduction in loan originations, an increase in non-performing assets, an
increase in foreclosure losses on mortgage loans, and a reduction in the value
of its loans and loan servicing portfolio.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
OFG Bancorp
FORM 10-K
FINANCIAL DATA INDEX
|
Page
|
|
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
|
89
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
90
|
|
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
|
91
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2018 and 2017
|
93
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and
2016
|
95
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31,
2018, 2017, and 2016
|
97
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December
31,
2018, 2017, and 2016
|
98
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and
2016
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
Note 1–
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
102
|
|
|
Note 2 –
Significant events
|
118
|
|
|
Note 3 –
Restricted Cash
|
119
|
|
|
Note 4 –
Investment Securities
|
120
|
|
|
Note 5
– Pledged Assets
|
126
|
|
|
Note 6 –
Loans
|
127
|
|
|
Note 7 –
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
|
154
|
|
|
Note 8
– FDIC Indemnification Asset and True-up Payment Obligation and FDIC
Shared-loss Expense
|
162
|
|
|
Note 9 –
Foreclosed Real Estate
|
163
|
|
|
Note 10 –
Premises and Equipment
|
163
|
|
|
Note 11 –
Servicing Assets
|
164
|
|
|
Note 12 –
Derivatives
|
166
|
|
|
Note 13 –
Accrued Interest Receivable and Other Assets
|
167
|
|
|
Note
14 – Deposits and Related Interest
|
168
|
|
|
Note
15 – Borrowings and Related Interest
|
170
|
|
|
Note
16 – Offsetting of Financial Assets and Liabilities
|
174
|
|
|
Note 17 –
Employee Benefit Plan
|
176
|
|
|
Note 18 –
Related Party Transactions
|
176
|
|
|
Note 19 –
Income Taxes
|
177
|
|
|
Note
20 – Regulatory Capital Requirements
|
180
|
|
|
Note
21 – Equity- Based Compensation Plan
|
182
|
|
|
Note 22 –
Stockholders’ Equity
|
183
|
|
|
Note 23
– Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
184
|
|
|
Note 24 –
Earnings per Common Share
|
187
|
|
|
Note
25 – Guarantees
|
188
|
|
|
Note
26 – Commitments and Contingencies
|
189
|
|
|
Note
27 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
192
|
|
|
Note
28 – Banking and Financial Service Revenues
|
198
|
|
|
Note
29 – Business Segments
|
200
|
|
|
Note
30 – OFG Bancorp (Holding Company Only) Financial Information
|
203
|
OFG Bancorp
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Board of Directors and stockholders of OFG
Bancorp:
The
management of OFG Bancorp ("Oriental") is responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and for the assessment of internal control
over financial reporting. Oriental’s internal control over financial reporting
is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Oriental’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that:
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that,
in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of Oriental;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of Oriental are being
made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of
Oriental; and
(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition
of Oriental’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As
called for by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management
has assessed the effectiveness of Oriental’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2018. Management made its assessment using the
criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the
“COSO Criteria”).
Based
on its assessment, management has concluded that Oriental maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 based on the
COSO Criteria.
The effectiveness of
Oriental’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,
has been audited by KPMG LLP, Oriental’s independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report dated March 8, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ José
Rafael Fernández
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Maritza
Arizmendi
|
José
Rafael Fernández
|
|
Maritza Arizmendi
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Date:
March 8, 2019
|
|
Date: March 8,
2019
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
To the
Stockholders and Board of Directors
OFG Bancorp:
Opinion
on the Consolidated Financial
Statements
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the related
notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements) of OFG Bancorp
and subsidiaries as listed in the accompanying index. In our opinion, the
consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the
three‑year period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established
in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March
8, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Basis
for Opinion
These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to
the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of
material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included
performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the
consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and
performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We
have served as the Company’s auditor since 2005.
/s/ KPMG
LLP
San Juan, Puerto Rico
March 8, 2019
Stamp
No. E363705 of the Puerto Rico
Society of Certified Public Accountants
was affixed to the record copy of this report.
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
To the
Stockholders and Board of Directors
OFG Bancorp:
Opinion
on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have
audited OFG Bancorp and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established
in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established
in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated statements of
financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively, the
consolidated financial statements), and our report dated March 8, 2019
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis
for Opinion
The
Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to
the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over
financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists,
and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition
and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/
KPMG LLP
San
Juan, Puerto Rico
March
8, 2019
Stamp
No. E363704 of the Puerto Rico
Society
of Certified Public Accountants
was
affixed to the record copy of this report
OFG BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND
2017
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
442,103
|
|
$
|
478,182
|
Money market investments
|
|
|
4,930
|
|
|
7,021
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
447,033
|
|
|
485,203
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
3,030
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities, at fair value, with amortized cost of $647 (December 31,
2017 - $647)
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
191
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value, with amortized cost
of $854,511 (December 31, 2017 - $648,800)
|
|
|
841,857
|
|
|
645,797
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost, with fair value of
$410,353 (December 31, 2017 - $497,681)
|
|
|
424,740
|
|
|
506,064
|
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost
|
|
|
12,644
|
|
|
13,995
|
Other investments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
Total investments
|
|
|
1,279,604
|
|
|
1,166,050
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value
|
|
|
10,368
|
|
|
12,272
|
Loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of
$164,231 (December 31, 2017 - $167,509)
|
|
|
4,421,226
|
|
|
4,044,057
|
Total loans
|
|
|
4,431,594
|
|
|
4,056,329
|
Other
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
33,768
|
|
|
44,174
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
34,254
|
|
|
49,969
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
113,763
|
|
|
127,421
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
68,892
|
|
|
67,860
|
Customers' liability on acceptances
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
27,663
|
Servicing assets
|
|
|
10,716
|
|
|
9,821
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
771
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
86,069
|
|
|
86,069
|
Other assets
|
|
|
57,345
|
|
|
64,693
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,583,352
|
|
$
|
6,189,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements
|
OFG BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND
2017 (CONTINUED)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$
|
2,191,802
|
|
$
|
2,039,126
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
1,212,259
|
|
|
1,251,398
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,504,054
|
|
|
1,508,958
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
4,908,115
|
|
|
4,799,482
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
455,508
|
|
|
192,869
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
77,620
|
|
|
99,643
|
Subordinated capital notes
|
|
|
36,083
|
|
|
36,083
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
153
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
570,425
|
|
|
328,748
|
Other
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
1,281
|
Acceptances executed and outstanding
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
27,644
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
87,665
|
|
|
86,791
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,583,475
|
|
|
5,243,946
|
Commitments
and contingencies (See Note 26)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; 10,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340,000 shares of Series A, 1,380,000 shares of Series B, and 960,000
shares of Series D issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(December 31, 2017 - 1,340,000 shares; 1,380,000 shares; and 960,000
shares) $25 liquidation value
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
92,000
|
84,000 shares of Series C issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017
$1,000 liquidation value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
84,000
|
Common stock, $1 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 59,885,234 shares
issued: 51,293,924 shares outstanding (December 31, 2017 - 52,625,869;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,947,442)
|
|
|
59,885
|
|
|
52,626
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
619,381
|
|
|
541,600
|
Legal surplus
|
|
|
90,167
|
|
|
81,454
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
253,040
|
|
|
200,878
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 8,591,310 shares (December 31, 2017 - 8,678,427
shares)
|
|
|
(103,633)
|
|
|
(104,502)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss), net of tax of $1,677 (December 31,
2017 - $564)
|
|
|
(10,963)
|
|
|
(2,949)
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
999,877
|
|
|
945,107
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
6,583,352
|
|
$
|
6,189,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements
|
OFG BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
$
|
321,381
|
|
$
|
312,421
|
|
$
|
321,945
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
31,190
|
|
|
26,994
|
|
|
30,522
|
Investment securities and other
|
|
7,848
|
|
|
6,232
|
|
|
4,125
|
Total interest income
|
|
360,419
|
|
|
345,647
|
|
|
356,592
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
32,953
|
|
|
30,298
|
|
|
29,253
|
Securities sold under agreements
to repurchase
|
|
7,794
|
|
|
7,223
|
|
|
18,805
|
Advances from FHLB and other
borrowings
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
6,186
|
Subordinated capital notes
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
2,921
|
Total interest
expense
|
|
44,525
|
|
|
41,475
|
|
|
57,165
|
Net interest income
|
|
315,894
|
|
|
304,172
|
|
|
299,427
|
Provision for loan and lease losses, net
|
|
56,108
|
|
|
113,139
|
|
|
65,076
|
Net interest income after provision for
loan and lease losses
|
|
259,786
|
|
|
191,033
|
|
|
234,351
|
Non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking service revenue
|
|
43,638
|
|
|
39,468
|
|
|
41,647
|
Wealth management revenue
|
|
25,934
|
|
|
25,790
|
|
|
27,433
|
Mortgage banking activities
|
|
4,767
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
5,021
|
Total banking and
financial service revenues
|
|
74,339
|
|
|
69,308
|
|
|
74,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC shared-loss benefit, net
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
(13,581)
|
Net gain on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of securities
|
|
-
|
|
|
6,896
|
|
|
12,207
|
Derivatives
|
|
-
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
(71)
|
Early extinguishment of debt
|
|
-
|
|
|
(80)
|
|
|
(12,000)
|
Other non-interest income
|
|
5,756
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
6,163
|
Total non-interest
income, net
|
|
80,095
|
|
|
78,687
|
|
|
66,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016 (CONTINUED)
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
Non-interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee
benefits
|
|
76,524
|
|
|
79,751
|
|
|
76,761
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
33,084
|
|
|
32,557
|
|
|
30,300
|
Electronic banking charges
|
|
21,234
|
|
|
19,322
|
|
|
20,707
|
Professional and service fees
|
|
12,442
|
|
|
12,406
|
|
|
12,235
|
Taxes, other than payroll and
income taxes
|
|
9,017
|
|
|
9,187
|
|
|
9,782
|
Credit related expenses
|
|
8,890
|
|
|
7,992
|
|
|
10,267
|
Information technology expenses
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
|
7,116
|
Insurance
|
|
6,249
|
|
|
5,223
|
|
|
9,109
|
Advertising, business promotion,
and strategic initiatives
|
|
5,084
|
|
|
5,616
|
|
|
5,485
|
Loan servicing and clearing
expenses
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
4,693
|
|
|
8,247
|
Loss on sale of foreclosed real
estate and other repossessed assets
|
|
4,662
|
|
|
4,634
|
|
|
10,282
|
Communication
|
|
3,447
|
|
|
3,415
|
|
|
3,379
|
Printing, postage, stationary
and supplies
|
|
2,217
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
|
2,558
|
Director and investor relations
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
1,087
|
Other
|
|
10,105
|
|
|
5,316
|
|
|
8,675
|
Total non-interest
expense
|
|
207,081
|
|
|
201,631
|
|
|
215,990
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
132,800
|
|
|
68,089
|
|
|
85,180
|
Income tax expense
|
|
48,390
|
|
|
15,443
|
|
|
25,994
|
Net income
|
|
84,410
|
|
|
52,646
|
|
|
59,186
|
Less: dividends on preferred
stock
|
|
(12,024)
|
|
|
(13,862)
|
|
|
(13,862)
|
Income (loss) available to common
shareholders
|
$
|
72,386
|
|
$
|
38,784
|
|
$
|
45,324
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
Diluted
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
Average common shares outstanding and
equivalents
|
|
51,349
|
|
|
51,096
|
|
|
51,088
|
Cash dividends per share of common stock
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
|
OFG BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$
|
84,410
|
|
$
|
52,646
|
|
$
|
59,186
|
Other
comprehensive loss before tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities available-for-sale
|
|
(9,651)
|
|
|
2,276
|
|
|
(5,023)
|
Realized gain on investment securities included in net income
|
|
-
|
|
|
(6,896)
|
|
|
(12,207)
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment included in net income
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges
|
|
524
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
3,303
|
Other
comprehensive loss before taxes
|
|
(9,127)
|
|
|
(4,126)
|
|
|
(13,927)
|
Income tax effect
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
(419)
|
|
|
1,526
|
Other
comprehensive loss after taxes
|
|
(8,014)
|
|
|
(4,545)
|
|
|
(12,401)
|
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
76,396
|
|
$
|
48,101
|
|
$
|
46,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements
|
OFG BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CHANGES
IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Preferred
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
$
|
176,000
|
|
$
|
176,000
|
$
|
176,000
|
|
Conversion
of convertible preferred stock into common stock
|
|
(84,000)
|
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
176,000
|
|
176,000
|
|
Common
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
52,626
|
|
|
52,626
|
|
52,626
|
|
Conversion
of convertible preferred stock into common stock
|
|
7,259
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
59,885
|
|
|
52,626
|
|
52,626
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
541,600
|
|
|
540,948
|
|
540,512
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
1,270
|
|
Stock-based
compensation excess tax benefit recognized in income
|
|
-
|
|
|
(99)
|
|
-
|
|
Lapsed
restricted stock units
|
|
(361)
|
|
|
(358)
|
|
(834)
|
|
Conversion
of convertible preferred stock into common stock
|
|
76,741
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
619,381
|
|
|
541,600
|
|
540,948
|
|
Legal
surplus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
81,454
|
|
|
76,293
|
|
70,435
|
|
Transfer
from retained earnings
|
|
8,713
|
|
|
5,161
|
|
5,858
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
90,167
|
|
|
81,454
|
|
76,293
|
|
Retained
earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
200,878
|
|
|
177,808
|
|
148,886
|
|
Net
income
|
|
84,410
|
|
|
52,646
|
|
59,186
|
|
Cash
dividends declared on common stock
|
|
(11,511)
|
|
|
(10,553)
|
|
(10,544)
|
|
Cash
dividends declared on preferred stock
|
|
(12,024)
|
|
|
(13,862)
|
|
(13,862)
|
|
Transfer
to legal surplus
|
|
(8,713)
|
|
|
(5,161)
|
|
(5,858)
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
253,040
|
|
|
200,878
|
|
177,808
|
|
Treasury
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
(104,502)
|
|
|
(104,860)
|
|
(105,379)
|
|
Lapsed
restricted stock units
|
|
869
|
|
|
358
|
|
519
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
(103,633)
|
|
|
(104,502)
|
|
(104,860)
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
(2,949)
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
13,997
|
|
Other
comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
(8,014)
|
|
|
(4,545)
|
|
(12,401)
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
(10,963)
|
|
|
(2,949)
|
|
1,596
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
999,877
|
|
$
|
945,107
|
$
|
920,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying nots are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements
|
|
OFG
BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$
|
84,410
|
|
$
|
52,646
|
$
|
59,186
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of deferred loan origination fees and fair value premiums on acquired loans
|
|
4,605
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
3,548
|
|
Amortization
of investment securities premiums, net of accretion of discounts
|
|
5,753
|
|
|
7,865
|
|
8,540
|
|
Amortization
of core deposit and customer relationship intangibles
|
|
1,319
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
1,677
|
|
Amortization
of fair value premiums on acquired deposits
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
340
|
|
FDIC
shared-loss (benefit) expense
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,403)
|
|
13,581
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization of premises and equipment
|
|
8,898
|
|
|
8,986
|
|
9,420
|
|
Deferred
income tax expense, net
|
|
14,772
|
|
|
(3,658)
|
|
23,226
|
|
Provision
for loan and lease losses
|
|
56,108
|
|
|
113,139
|
|
65,076
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
1,270
|
|
Stock-based
compensation excess tax benefit recognized in income
|
|
-
|
|
|
(99)
|
|
-
|
|
(Gain)
loss on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of loans
|
|
(301)
|
|
|
(955)
|
|
(1,570)
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
-
|
|
|
(103)
|
|
181
|
|
Sale of securities
|
|
-
|
|
|
(6,896)
|
|
(12,207)
|
|
Early extinguishment of debt
|
|
-
|
|
|
80
|
|
12,000
|
|
Foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
4,964
|
|
11,934
|
|
Sale of other assets
|
|
(107)
|
|
|
(539)
|
|
12
|
|
Sale of other repossesed assets
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
57
|
|
(1,623)
|
|
Originations
of loans held-for-sale
|
|
(95,520)
|
|
|
(116,020)
|
|
(179,430)
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of loans held-for-sale
|
|
27,757
|
|
|
75,637
|
|
69,862
|
|
Net
(increase) decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
(169)
|
|
|
156
|
|
(59)
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
15,715
|
|
|
(29,742)
|
|
410
|
|
Servicing assets
|
|
(895)
|
|
|
37
|
|
(2,403)
|
|
Other assets
|
|
5,486
|
|
|
13,675
|
|
(7,941)
|
|
Net
(decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest on deposits and borrowings
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
(937)
|
|
(862)
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
(2,028)
|
|
|
28,431
|
|
4,344
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
133,355
|
|
|
151,440
|
|
78,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements
|
|
|
|
OFG
BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016 (CONTINUED)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
(271,639)
|
|
|
(182,054)
|
|
(119,544)
|
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
(86,478)
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
(113,731)
|
|
|
(31,950)
|
|
(20,421)
|
|
Maturities
and redemptions of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
120,709
|
|
|
105,169
|
|
145,512
|
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity
|
|
77,583
|
|
|
88,726
|
|
101,965
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
115,082
|
|
|
28,748
|
|
30,411
|
|
Proceeds
from sales of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
17,837
|
|
|
256,996
|
|
300,483
|
|
Foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets, including write-offs
|
|
51,057
|
|
|
40,051
|
|
47,507
|
|
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
123,137
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
569
|
|
48
|
|
Origination
and purchase of loans, excluding loans held-for-sale
|
|
(1,315,906)
|
|
|
(801,766)
|
|
(768,353)
|
|
Principal
repayment of loans
|
|
840,064
|
|
|
699,409
|
|
817,199
|
|
Repayments
to FDIC on shared-loss agreements
|
|
-
|
|
|
(10,125)
|
|
1,573
|
|
Additions
to premises and equipment
|
|
(11,491)
|
|
|
(6,469)
|
|
(5,297)
|
|
Net
change in restricted cash
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
319
|
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
(488,767)
|
|
|
187,304
|
|
568,061
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
100,147
|
|
|
125,991
|
|
(61,078)
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
262,223
|
|
|
(459,815)
|
|
(292,264)
|
|
FHLB advances, federal funds purchased, and other borrowings
|
|
(20,816)
|
|
|
(5,741)
|
|
(228,633)
|
|
Subordinated capital notes
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
(66,550)
|
|
Restricted
units lapsed
|
|
508
|
|
|
-
|
|
(315)
|
|
Dividends
paid on preferred stock
|
|
(12,024)
|
|
|
(13,862)
|
|
(13,862)
|
|
Dividends
paid on common stock
|
|
(12,796)
|
|
|
(10,553)
|
|
(10,141)
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
$
|
317,242
|
|
$
|
(363,980)
|
$
|
(672,843)
|
|
Net
change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
(38,170)
|
|
|
(25,236)
|
|
(26,270)
|
|
Cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year
|
|
488,233
|
|
|
513,469
|
|
539,739
|
|
Cash,
cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year
|
$
|
450,063
|
|
$
|
488,233
|
$
|
513,469
|
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Disclosure and Schedule of Non-cash Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
$
|
41,318
|
|
$
|
40,570
|
$
|
56,302
|
|
Income
taxes paid
|
$
|
17,778
|
|
$
|
30
|
$
|
10,051
|
|
Mortgage
loans securitized into mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
74,630
|
|
$
|
74,919
|
$
|
112,071
|
|
Transfer
from loans to foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets
|
$
|
47,084
|
|
$
|
43,163
|
$
|
45,538
|
|
Reclassification
of loans held-for-investment portfolio to held-for-sale portfolio
|
$
|
5,795
|
|
$
|
33,647
|
$
|
123,137
|
|
Reclassification
of loans held-for-sale portfolio to held-for-investment portfolio
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
$
|
293
|
$
|
182
|
|
Conversion
of convertible preferred stock into common stock
|
$
|
84,000
|
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|
Financed
sales of foreclosed real estate
|
$
|
2,333
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
$
|
2,212
|
|
Loans
booked under the GNMA buy-back option
|
$
|
13,325
|
|
$
|
8,268
|
$
|
9,681
|
|
Interest
capitalized on loans subject to the temporary payment moratorium
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
39,701
|
$
|
-
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements
|
|
OFG
BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016 (CONTINUED)
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 –
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies of
OFG Bancorp (Oriental) conform with GAAP and to banking industry practices. The
following is a description of Oriental’s most significant accounting policies:
Nature
of Operations
Oriental
is a publicly-owned financial holding company incorporated under the laws of
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Oriental
operates through various subsidiaries including, a commercial bank, Oriental
Bank (the “Bank”), a securities broker-dealer, Oriental Financial Services
Corp. (“Oriental Financial Services”), an insurance agency, Oriental Insurance,
LLC (“Oriental Insurance”), and a retirement plan administrator, Oriental
Pension Consultants, Inc. (“OPC”). Oriental
also has a special purpose entity, Oriental Financial (PR) Statutory Trust II
(the “Statutory Trust II”). Through these subsidiaries and their respective
divisions, Oriental provides a wide range of banking and financial services
such as commercial, consumer and mortgage lending, leasing, auto loans,
financial planning, insurance sales, money management and investment banking
and brokerage services, as well as corporate and individual trust services.
The
main offices of Oriental and its subsidiaries are located in San Juan, Puerto
Rico, except for OPC, which is located in Boca Raton, Florida. Oriental is
subject to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) under the U.S. Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Bank is subject to the
supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of the Commissioner of
Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico (“OCFI”) and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation ( “FDIC”). The Bank offers banking services such as
commercial and consumer lending, leasing, auto loans, savings and time deposit
products, financial planning, and corporate and individual trust services, and
capitalizes on its commercial banking network to provide mortgage lending
products to its clients. The Bank has an operating subsidiary, OFG USA, which
is a commercial lender organized in Delaware and based in Cornelius, North
Carolina. Oriental International Bank Inc. (“OIB”), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Bank, and Oriental Overseas, a division of the Bank, are international
banking entities licensed pursuant to the International Banking Center
Regulatory Act of Puerto Rico, as amended. OIB and Oriental Overseas offer the
Bank certain Puerto Rico tax advantages. Their activities are limited under
Puerto Rico law to persons located in Puerto Rico with assets/liabilities
located outside of Puerto Rico.
Oriental
Financial Services is a securities broker-dealer and is subject to the
supervision, examination and regulation of the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (“FINRA”), the SEC, and the OCFI. Oriental Financial Services is also
a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Oriental Insurance
is an insurance agency and is subject to the supervision, examination and
regulation of the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance of Puerto Rico.
Oriental’s
mortgage banking activities are conducted through a division of the Bank. The
mortgage banking activities include the origination of mortgage loans for the
Bank’s own portfolio, and the sale of loans directly in the secondary market or
the securitization of conforming loans into mortgage-backed securities. The
Bank originates Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) insured and Veterans
Administration (“VA”) guaranteed mortgages that are primarily securitized for
issuance of Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage-backed
securities which can be resold to individual or institutional investors in the
secondary market. Conventional loans that meet the underwriting requirements
for sale or exchange under certain Federal National Mortgage Association
(“FNMA”) or Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) programs are
referred to as conforming mortgage loans and are also securitized for issuance
of FNMA or FHLMC mortgage-backed securities. The Bank is an approved seller of
FNMA and FHLMC mortgage loans for issuance of FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed
securities. The Bank is also an approved issuer of GNMA mortgage-backed
securities. The Bank is the master servicer of the GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pools
that it issues and of its mortgage loan portfolio, and has a subservicing
arrangement with a third party for a portion of its acquired loan portfolio. During 2016, Oriental began servicing most of its mortgage
loan portfolio.
On
December 18, 2012, Oriental purchased from Banco Bilbao Vizcaya
Argentaria, S. A. (“BBVA”), all of the outstanding common stock of each of (i)
BBVAPR Holding Corporation (“BBVAPR Holding”), the sole shareholder of Banco
Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Puerto Rico (“BBVAPR Bank”), a Puerto Rico chartered
commercial bank, and BBVA Seguros, Inc. (“BBVA Seguros”), a subsidiary offering
insurance services, and (ii) BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico, Inc. (“BBVA
Securities”), a registered broker-dealer. This transaction is referred to as
the “BBVAPR Acquisition” and BBVAPR Holding, BBVAPR Bank, BBVA Seguros and BBVA
Securities are collectively referred to as the “BBVAPR Companies” or “BBVAPR.”
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of OFG Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Statutory Trust II is exempt from the consolidation requirements of GAAP.
Use
of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates
that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate
mainly to the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses, the
valuation of securities and derivative instruments, revisions to expected cash
flows in acquired loans, the determination of income taxes,
other-than-temporary impairment of securities, and goodwill valuation and
impairment assessment.
Cash Equivalents
Oriental considers as cash equivalents all money
market instruments that are not pledged and that have maturities of three
months or less at the date of acquisition.
Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing
income available to common shareholders (net income reduced by dividends on
preferred stock) by the weighted average of outstanding common shares. Diluted
earnings per share is similar to the computation of basic earnings per share
except that the weighted average of common shares is increased to include the
number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the
potentially dilutive common shares underlying stock options and restricted
units had been issued, assuming that proceeds from exercise are used to
repurchase shares in the market (treasury stock method). Any stock splits and
dividends are retroactively recognized in all periods presented in the consolidated
financial statements.
Securities Purchased/Sold Under Agreements to
Resell/Repurchase
Oriental purchases securities under
agreements to resell the same or similar securities. Amounts advanced under
these agreements represent short-term loans and are reflected as assets in the
consolidated statements of financial condition. It is Oriental’s policy to take
possession of securities purchased under resale agreements while the
counterparty retains effective control over the securities. Oriental monitors the
fair value of the underlying securities as compared to the related receivable,
including accrued interest, and requests additional collateral when deemed
appropriate.
Oriental also sells securities under
agreements to repurchase the same or similar securities. Oriental retains
effective control over the securities sold under these agreements. Accordingly,
such agreements are treated as financing arrangements, and the obligations to
repurchase the securities sold are reflected as liabilities. The securities
underlying the financing agreements remain included in the asset accounts. The
counterparty to repurchase agreements generally has the right to repledge the
securities received as collateral.
Investment Securities
Securities
are classified as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading. Securities
for which Oriental has the intent and ability to hold until maturity are
classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at amortized cost. Securities
that might be sold prior to maturity because of interest rate changes to meet
liquidity needs or to better match the repricing characteristics of funding
sources are classified as available-for-sale. These securities are reported at
fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported
net of tax in other comprehensive income (loss).
Oriental
classifies as trading those securities that are acquired and held principally
for the purpose of selling them in the near future. These securities are
carried at fair value with realized and unrealized changes in fair value
included in earnings in the period in which the changes occur.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Oriental’s investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York (“FHLB-NY”) stock, a restricted security, has no readily determinable
fair value and can only be sold back to the FHLB-NY at cost. Therefore, these
stock shares are deemed to be nonmarketable equity securities and are carried
at cost.
Premiums
and discounts are amortized to interest income over the life of the related
securities using the interest method. Net realized gains or losses on sales of
investment securities and unrealized gains and losses valuation adjustments
considered other than temporary, if any, on securities classified as either
available-for-sale or held-to-maturity are reported separately in the
statements of operations. The cost of securities sold is determined by the
specific identification method.
Financial
Instruments
Certain
financial instruments, including derivatives, trading securities and investment
securities available-for-sale, are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains
and losses are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) or as part of
non-interest income, as appropriate. Fair values are based on listed market
prices, if available. If listed market prices are not available, fair value is
determined based on other relevant factors, including price quotations for
similar instruments. The fair values of certain derivative contracts are
derived from pricing models that consider current market and contractual prices
for the underlying financial instruments as the well as time value and yield
curve or volatility factors underlying the positions.
Oriental determines the fair value of its financial
instruments based on the fair value measurement framework, which establishes a
fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used
to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1
measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3
measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described
below:
Level 1 — Level 1 assets and liabilities include equity
securities that are traded in an active exchange market. Valuations are
obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions
involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such
as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets
that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated
by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for
which the fair value is estimated based on valuations obtained from third-party
pricing services for identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities
with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded
instruments and (iii) derivative contracts and financial liabilities whose
value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in
the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or
no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or
liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose
value is determined using pricing models for which the determination of fair
value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3
for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during
the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016. Oriental’s policy is to
recognize transfers at the date of the event or change in circumstances that
caused the transfer.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Impairment of
Investment Securities
Oriental
conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment in an
unrealized loss position for other-than-temporary impairment. Oriental
separates the amount of total impairment into credit and noncredit-related
amounts. The term “other-than-temporary impairment” is not intended to indicate
that the decline is permanent but indicates that the prospects for a near-term
recovery of value is not favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to
support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the
investment. Any portion of a decline in value associated with a credit loss is
recognized in income, while the remaining noncredit-related component is
recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). A credit loss is determined by
assessing whether the amortized cost basis of the security will be recovered by
comparing it to the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from
the security discounted at the rate equal to the yield used to accrete current
and prospective beneficial interest for the security. The shortfall of the
present value of the cash flows expected to be collected in relation to the
amortized cost basis is considered to be the “credit loss.”
Oriental’s review for impairment generally entails,
but is not limited to:
•
the identification and evaluation of investments that have indications of
possible other-than-temporary impairment;
• the
analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized
cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in
an unrealized loss position, and the expected recovery period;
•
the financial condition of the issuer or issuers;
•
the creditworthiness of the obligor of the security;
•
actual collateral attributes;
•
any rating changes by a rating agency;
•
current analysts’ evaluations;
•
the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer
being able to make payments;
•
current market conditions;
•
adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a
geographic area;
•
Oriental’s intent to sell the debt security;
•
whether it is more-likely-than-not that Oriental will be required to sell the
debt security before its anticipated recovery; and
•
other qualitative factors that could support or not an other-than-temporary
impairment.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
Oriental’s
overall interest rate risk-management strategy incorporates the use of
derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in
earnings that are caused by interest rate volatility. Oriental’s goal is to
manage interest rate sensitivity by modifying the repricing or maturity
characteristics of certain balance sheet assets and liabilities so that the net
interest margin is not, on a material basis, adversely affected by movements in
interest rates. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged fixed-rate
assets and liabilities will appreciate or depreciate in market value. Also, for
some fixed-rate assets or liabilities, the effect of this variability in
earnings is expected to be substantially offset by Oriental’s gains and losses
on the derivative instruments that are linked to the forecasted cash flows of
these hedged assets and liabilities. Oriental considers its strategic use of
derivatives to be a prudent method of managing interest-rate sensitivity as it
reduces the exposure of earnings and the market value of its equity to undue
risk posed by changes in interest rates. The effect of this unrealized appreciation
or depreciation is expected to be substantially offset by Oriental’s gains or
losses on the derivative instruments that are linked to these hedged assets and
liabilities. Another result of interest rate fluctuation is that the
contractual interest income and interest expense of hedged variable-rate assets
and liabilities, respectively, will increase or decrease.
Derivative
instruments that are used as part of Oriental’s interest rate risk-management
strategy include interest rate swaps, caps, forward-settlement swaps, and
futures contracts. Interest rate swaps generally involve the exchange of fixed
and variable-rate interest payments between two parties based on a common
notional principal amount and maturity date. Interest rate futures generally
involve exchange-traded contracts to buy or sell U.S. Treasury bonds and notes
in the future at specified prices. Interest rate options represent contracts
that allow the holder of the option to (i) receive cash or
(ii) purchase, sell, or enter into a financial instrument at a specified
price within a specified period. Some purchased option contracts give Oriental
the right to enter into interest rate swaps and cap and floor agreements with
the writer of the option. In addition, Oriental enters into certain
transactions that contain embedded derivatives. When the embedded derivative
possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to
the economic characteristics of the host contract, it is bifurcated and carried
at fair value.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
When using derivative instruments, Oriental exposes
itself to credit and market risk. If a counterparty fails to fulfill its
performance obligations under a derivative contract due to insolvency or any
other event of default, Oriental’s credit risk will equal the fair value gain
in a derivative plus any cash or securities that may have been delivered to the
counterparty as part of the transaction terms. Generally, when the fair value
of a derivative contract is positive, this indicates that the counterparty owes
Oriental, thus creating a repayment risk for Oriental. This risk is generally
mitigated by requesting cash or securities from the counterparty to cover the
positive fair value. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative,
Oriental owes the counterparty and, therefore, assumes no credit risk other
than to the extent that the cash or value of the collateral delivered as part
of the transactions exceeds the fair value of the derivative. Oriental
minimizes the credit (or repayment) risk in derivative instruments by entering
into transactions with high-quality counterparties.
Oriental
uses forward-settlement swaps to hedge the variability of future interest cash
flows of forecasted wholesale borrowings attributable to changes in LIBOR. Once
the forecasted wholesale borrowing transactions occur, the interest rate swap
will effectively lock-in Oriental’s interest rate payments on an amount of
forecasted interest expense attributable to the one-month LIBOR corresponding
to the swap notional amount. By employing this strategy, Oriental minimizes its
exposure to volatility in LIBOR.
As
part of this hedging strategy, Oriental formally documents all relationships
between hedging instruments and hedged items, as the well as its
risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedging
transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated
as cash flow hedges to (i) specific assets and liabilities on the balance
sheet or (ii) specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions.
Oriental also formally assesses (both at the hedge’s inception and on an
ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions
have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash
flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain
highly effective in future periods. The changes in fair value of the
forward-settlement swaps are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) to the extent there is no significant ineffectiveness.
Oriental
discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when (i) it determines that
the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows
of a hedged item (including hedged items such as firm commitments or forecasted
transactions); (ii) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or
exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction
will occur; (iv) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition
of a firm commitment; or (v) management determines that designating the
derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate or desired.
Oriental’s
derivative activities are monitored by its Asset/Liability Management Committee
which is also responsible for approving hedging strategies that are developed
through its analysis of data derived from financial simulation models and other
internal and industry sources. The resulting hedging strategies are then
incorporated into Oriental’s overall interest rate risk-management.
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, Oriental enters
into off-balance sheet instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit,
further discussed in Note 26 hereto. Such financial instruments are
recorded in the financial statements when these are funded or related fees are
incurred or received. Oriental periodically evaluates the credit risks inherent
in these commitments and establishes accruals for such risks if and when these
are deemed necessary.
Mortgage
Banking Activities and Loans Held-For-Sale
The residential mortgage loans reported as
held-for-sale are stated at the lower of cost or fair value, cost being
determined on the outstanding loan balance less unearned income, and fair value
determined in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses are recognized through a
valuation allowance by charges to income. Realized gains or losses on these
loans are determined using the specific identification method. Loans
held-for-sale include all conforming mortgage loans originated and purchased,
which from time to time Oriental sells to other financial institutions or
securitizes conforming mortgage loans into GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pass-through
certificates.
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities
Oriental recognizes the financial and servicing assets
it controls and the liabilities it has incurred, derecognizes financial assets
when control has been surrendered, and derecognizes liabilities when
extinguished. Oriental is not engaged in sales of mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities subject to recourse provisions except for those
provisions that allow for the repurchase of loans as a result
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
of a breach of certain representations and warranties
other than those related to the credit quality of the loans included in the
sale transactions.
The transfer of an entire financial asset, a group of
entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial
asset in which Oriental surrenders control over the assets is accounted for as
a sale if all of the following conditions set forth in Accounting Standards
Codification ("ASC") Topic 860 are met: (i) the assets must be
isolated from creditors of the transferor, (ii) the transferee must obtain
the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that
right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (iii) the
transferor cannot maintain effective control over the transferred assets
through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. When Oriental
transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of these criteria,
Oriental is prevented from derecognizing the transferred financial assets and
the transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing. For federal and Puerto
Rico income tax purposes, Oriental treats the transfers of loans which do not
qualify as “true sales” under the applicable accounting guidance, as sales,
recognizing a deferred tax asset or liability on the transaction. For transfers
of financial assets that satisfy the conditions to be accounted for as sales,
Oriental derecognizes all assets sold; recognizes all assets obtained and
liabilities incurred in consideration as proceeds of the sale, including
servicing assets and servicing liabilities, if applicable; initially measures
at fair value assets obtained and liabilities incurred in a sale; and
recognizes in earnings any gain or loss on the sale. The guidance on transfer
of financial assets requires a true sale analysis of the treatment of the
transfer under state law as if Oriental was a debtor under the bankruptcy code.
A true sale legal analysis includes several legally relevant factors, such as
the intent of the parties, the nature and level of recourse to the transferor,
and the nature of retained interests in the loans sold. The analytical
conclusion as to a true sale is never absolute and unconditional, but contains
qualifications based on the inherent equitable powers of a bankruptcy court, as
well as the unsettled state of the common law. Once the legal isolation test
has been met, other factors concerning the nature and extent of the
transferor’s control over the transferred assets are taken into account in
order to determine whether derecognition of assets is warranted.
When Oriental sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it
generally makes customary representations and warranties regarding the
characteristics of the loans sold. Conforming conventional mortgage loans are
combined into pools which are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities,
which are generally sold to private investors, or sold directly to FNMA or
other private investors for cash. To the extent the loans do not meet the
specified characteristics, investors are generally entitled to require Oriental
to repurchase such loans or indemnify the investor against losses if the assets
do not meet certain guidelines. GNMA programs allow financial institutions to
buy back individual delinquent mortgage loans that meet certain criteria from
the securitized loan pool for which Oriental provides servicing. At Oriental’s
option and without GNMA prior authorization, Oriental may repurchase such
delinquent loans for an amount equal to 100% of the loan’s remaining principal
balance. This buy-back option is considered a conditional option until the
delinquency criteria is met, at which time the option becomes unconditional.
When the loans backing a GNMA security are initially securitized, Oriental
treats the transaction as a sale for accounting purposes because the
conditional nature of the buy-back option means that Oriental does not maintain
effective control over the loans, and therefore these are derecognized from the
statement of financial condition. When individual loans later meet GNMA’s
specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, Oriental is
deemed to have regained effective control over these loans, and these must be
brought back onto Oriental’s books as assets, regardless of whether Oriental
intends to exercise the buy-back option. Quality review procedures are
performed by Oriental as required under the government agency programs to
ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. Oriental has not recorded
any specific contingent liability in the consolidated financial statements for
these customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by
Oriental, and management believes that, based on historical data, the
probability of payments and expected losses under these representation and
warranty arrangements is not significant.
Oriental has liability for residential
mortgage loans sold subject to credit recourse, principally loans associated with FNMA residential mortgage loan
sales and securitization programs. In the
event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided,
Oriental is required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party
investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments
that Oriental would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the
event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding
balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest,
if applicable. In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, Oriental has
rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. Oriental
suffers ultimate losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure
sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the
outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest
advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property. Oriental
has established a liability to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related
to loans sold with credit recourse.
The estimated losses to be absorbed under the credit
recourse arrangements are recorded as a liability when the loans are sold or
credit recourse is assumed as part of acquired servicing rights, and are
updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in the line item
"mortgage banking activities" in the consolidated statements of
operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
additional relevant information becomes available. The
methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the
recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include
actual defaults and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated
future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent.
Statistical methods are used to estimate the recourse liability. The expected
loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan,
considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability of
default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become
120 days delinquent within the following twelve-month period.
Servicing
Assets
Oriental periodically sells or securitizes mortgage
loans while retaining the obligation to perform the servicing of such loans. In
addition, Oriental may purchase or assume the right to service mortgage loans
originated by others. Whenever Oriental undertakes an obligation to service a
loan, management assesses whether a servicing asset and/or liability should be
recognized. A servicing asset is recognized whenever the compensation for
servicing is expected to more than adequately compensate Oriental for servicing
the loans. Likewise, a servicing liability would be recognized in the event
that servicing fees to be received are not expected to adequately compensate
Oriental for its expected cost.
All separately recognized servicing assets are
recognized at fair value using the fair value measurement method. Under the
fair value measurement method, Oriental measures servicing rights at fair value
at each reporting date and reports changes in fair value of servicing asset in
the statement of operations in the period in which the changes occur, and
includes these changes, if any, with mortgage banking activities in the
consolidated statement of operations. The fair value of servicing rights is
subject to fluctuations as a result of changes in estimated and actual
prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.
The fair value of servicing rights is estimated by
using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of
estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and
expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other
economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions.
Loans
and Leases
Originated and Other Loans and Leases Held in Portfolio
Loans
that Oriental originates and intends to hold in portfolio are stated at the
principal amount outstanding, adjusted for unamortized deferred fees and costs
which are amortized to interest income over the expected life of the loan using
the interest method. Oriental discontinues accrual of interest on originated
loans after payments become more than 90 days
past due or earlier if Oriental does not expect the full collection of
principal or interest. The delinquency status is based upon the contractual
terms of the loans.
Loans for which the recognition of interest income has
been discontinued are designated as non-accruing. Collections are accounted for
on the cash method thereafter, until qualifying to return to accrual status.
Such loans are not reinstated to accrual status until interest is received on a
current basis and other factors indicative of doubtful collection cease to
exist. The determination as to the ultimate collectability of the loan’s
balance may involve management’s judgment in the evaluation of the borrower’s
financial condition and prospects for repayment.
Oriental follows a systematic methodology
to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease
losses to provide for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This methodology
includes the consideration of factors such as economic conditions, portfolio
risk characteristics, prior loss experience, and results of periodic credit
reviews of individual loans. The provision for loan and lease losses charged to
current operations is based on such methodology. Loan and lease losses are
charged, and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan and lease losses
on originated and other loans.
Larger commercial loans that exhibit
potential or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review and
grading. Where appropriate, allowances are allocated to individual loans based
on management’s estimate of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan given the
availability of collateral, other sources of cash flow, and legal options
available to Oriental.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Included in
the review of individual loans are those that are impaired. A loan is
considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is
probable that Oriental will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of
principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected
future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or as a
practical expedient, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair
value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Loans are
individually evaluated for impairment, except large groups of small balance
homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and loans that
are recorded at fair value or at the lower of cost or fair value. Oriental
measures for impairment all commercial loans over $250 thousand (i) that are
either over 90 days past due or adversely classified, (ii) that are
troubled-debt restructurings (each, a "TDR”), or (iii) when deemed
necessary by management. The portfolios of mortgage loans, auto and leasing,
and consumer loans are considered homogeneous and are evaluated collectively
for impairment.
Oriental uses a rating system to apply an
overall allowance percentage to each originated and other loan portfolio
segment based on historical credit losses adjusted for current conditions and
trends. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and
is based on the actual loss history experienced by Oriental over a determined
look back period for each segment. The actual loss factor is adjusted by the
appropriate loss emergence period as calculated for each portfolio. Then, the
adjusted loss experience is supplemented with other qualitative factors based
on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These qualitative factors
include consideration of the following: the credit grading assigned to
commercial loans; levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans;
levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume and terms
of loans; effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards;
other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practices; experience,
ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff, including
the bank’s loan review system as graded by regulatory agencies in their last
examination; local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; effects
of external factors such as competition and regulatory requirements on the
level of estimated credit losses in the current portfolio; and effects of
changes in credit concentrations and collateral value. An additional impact from the historical loss
experience is applied based on levels of delinquency, loan classification, FICO
score and/or origination date, depending on the portfolio.
At origination, a
determination is made whether a loan will be held in our portfolio or is
intended for sale in the secondary market. Loans that will be held in
Oriental’s portfolio are carried at amortized cost. Residential mortgage loans
held for sale are recorded at the lower of the aggregate cost or market value
(“LOCOM”).
Acquired Loans and Leases
Loans that Oriental acquires
in acquisitions are recorded at fair value with no carryover of the related
allowance for loan losses. Determining the fair value of the loans involves
estimating the amount and timing of principal and interest cash flows expected
to be collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows at a market rate
of interest.
Oriental has acquired loans in
two separate acquisitions, the BBVAPR Acquisition in December 2012 and the
FDIC-assisted Eurobank acquisition in April 2010. For each acquisition,
Oriental considered the following factors as indicators that an acquired loan
had evidence of deterioration in credit quality and was therefore in the scope
of ASC 310-30:
·
Loans that were 90 days or more
past due;
·
Loans that had an internal risk
rating of substandard or worse (substandard is consistent with regulatory
definitions and is defined as having a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes
liquidation of the loan);
·
Loans that were classified as
nonaccrual by the acquired bank at the time of acquisition; and
·
Loans that had been previously
modified in a TDR.
Any acquired loans that were
not individually in the scope of ASC 310-30 because they did not meet the
criteria above were either (i) pooled into groups of similar loans based on the
borrower type, loan purpose, and collateral type and accounted for under ASC
310-30 by analogy or (ii) accounted for under ASC 310-20 (non-refundable fees
and other costs).
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Acquired Loans Accounted for under ASC 310-20 (loans
with revolving feature and/or acquired at a premium)
Revolving credit facilities such as credit cards,
retail and commercial lines of credit and floor plans which are specifically
scoped out of ASC 310-30 are accounted for under the provisions of ASC 310-20.
Also, performing auto loans with FICO scores over 660 acquired at a premium in
the BBVAPR Acquisition are accounted for under this guidance. Auto loans with
FICO scores below 660 were acquired at a discount and are accounted for under
the provisions of ASC 310-30. The provisions of ASC 310-20 require that any
differences between the contractually required loan payments in excess of
Oriental’s initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income on
a level-yield basis over the life of the loan. Loans acquired in the BBVAPR
Acquisition that were accounted for under the provisions of ASC 310-20 which
had fully amortized their premium or discount, recorded at the date of
acquisition, are removed from the acquired loan category. Loans accounted for
under ASC 310-20 are placed on non-accrual status when past due in accordance
with Oriental’s non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is
discontinued. These assets were recorded at estimated fair value on their
acquisition date, incorporating an estimate of future expected cash flows. Such
fair value includes a credit discount which accounts for expected loan losses
over the estimated life of these loans. Management takes into consideration
this credit discount when determining the necessary allowance for acquired
loans that are accounted for under the provisions of ASC 310-20.
The allowance for loan and lease losses model for
acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 is the same as for the originated
and other loan portfolio.
Acquired Loans Accounted under ASC 310-30 (including
those accounted for under ASC 310-30 by analogy)
Oriental performed a fair
market valuation of each of the loan pools, and each pool was recorded at a
discount. Oriental determined that at least part of the discount on the
acquired individual or pools of loans was attributable to credit quality by
reference to the valuation model used to estimate the fair value of these pools
of loans. The valuation model incorporated lifetime expected credit losses into
the loans’ fair valuation in consideration of factors such as evidence of
credit deterioration since origination and the amounts of contractually
required principal and interest that Oriental did not expect to collect as of
the acquisition date. Based on the guidance included in the December 18, 2009
letter from the AICPA Depository Institutions Panel to the Office of the Chief
Accountant of the SEC, Oriental has made an accounting policy election to apply
ASC 310-30 by analogy to all of these acquired pools of loans as they all (i)
were acquired in a business combination or asset purchase, (ii) resulted in
recognition of a discount attributable, at least in part, to credit quality;
and (iii) were not subsequently accounted for at fair value.
The excess of expected cash
flows from acquired loans over the estimated fair value of acquired loans at
acquisition is referred to as the accretable discount and is recognized into
interest income over the remaining life of the acquired loans using the
interest method. The difference between contractually required payments at
acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is
referred to as the nonaccretable discount. The nonaccretable discount
represents estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life
of the acquired loans. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows require
Oriental to evaluate the need for an addition to the allowance for loan losses.
Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows result in the reversal of the
associated allowance for loan losses, if any and the reversal of a
corresponding amount of the nonaccretable discount which Oriental then
reclassifies as accretable discount that is recognized into interest income
over the remaining life of the loan using the interest method. Oriental’s
evaluation of the amount of future cash flows that it expects to collect takes
into account actual credit performance of the acquired loans to date and
Oriental’s best estimates for the expected lifetime credit performance of the
loans using currently available information. Charge-offs of the principal
amount on acquired loans would be first applied to the nonaccretable discount
portion of the fair value adjustment.
In accordance with ASC 310-30,
recognition of income is dependent on having a reasonable expectation about the
timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. Oriental performs
such an evaluation on a quarterly basis on both its acquired loans individually
accounted for under ASC 310-30 and those in pools accounted for under ASC
310-30 by analogy.
Cash flows for acquired loans
individually accounted for under ASC 310-30 are estimated on a quarterly basis.
Based on this evaluation, a determination is made as to whether or not Oriental
has a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows. Such an
expectation includes cash flows from normal customer repayment, collateral
value, foreclosure or other collection efforts. Cash flows for acquired loans
accounted for on a pooled basis under ASC 310-30 by analogy are also estimated
on a quarterly basis. For residential real estate, home equity and other
consumer loans, cash flow loss estimates are calculated based on a model that
incorporates a projected probability of default and loss. For commercial loans,
lifetime loss rates are assigned to each pool with consideration given for pool
make-up, including risk rating profile. Lifetime loss rates are developed from
internally generated historical loss data and are applied to each pool.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
To the extent that Oriental cannot reasonably estimate
cash flows, interest income recognition is discontinued. The unit of account
for loans in pools accounted for under ASC 310-30 by analogy is the pool of
loans. Accordingly, as long as Oriental can reasonably estimate cash flows for
the pool as a whole, accretable yield on the pool is recognized and all individual
loans within the pool - even those more than 90 days past due - would be
considered to be accruing interest in Oriental’s financial statement
disclosures, regardless of whether or not Oriental expects any principal or
interest cash flows on an individual loan 90 days or more past due.
Oriental writes-off the loan’s recorded investment and
derecognizes the associated allowance for loan and lease losses for loans that
exit the acquired pools.
Effective
February 6, 2017, Oriental and the FDIC agreed to terminate the loss and
recovery sharing agreements in connection with a portfolio of loans acquired in
the Eurobank FDIC assisted transaction.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Oriental follows a systematic
methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan
and lease losses to provide for inherent losses in loan portfolio. This
methodology includes the consideration of factors such as economic conditions,
portfolio risk characteristics, prior loss experience, and results of periodic
credit reviews of individual loans.
Oriental’s assessment of
the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the guidance of
loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC
Section 310-10-35. Also, Oriental determines the allowance for loan losses on
purchased impaired loans and purchased loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic
310-30 by analogy, by evaluating decreases in expected cash flows after the
acquisition date.
The loss factor used for the general
reserve of these loans is established considering Oriental’s historical loss
experience adjusted for an estimated loss emergence period and the
consideration of environmental factors. Environmental factors considered are:
change in non-performing loans; migration in classification; trends in charge
offs; trends in volume of loans; changes in collateral values; changes in risk
selections and underwriting standards, and other changes in lending policies,
procedures and practices; experience, ability and depth of lending management
and other relevant staff, including Oriental’s loan review system; national and
local economic trends and industry conditions; and effect of external factors
such as competition and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated
credit losses. The sum of the adjusted loss experience factors and the
environmental factors will be the general valuation reserve (“GVA”) factor to
be used for the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses in
each category.
Originated and Other Loans and Leases Held for
Investment and Acquired Loans Accounted for under ASC 310-20 (Loans
with revolving feature and/or acquired at a premium)
Oriental determines the allowance for loan and lease
losses by portfolio segment, which consist of mortgage loans, commercial loans,
consumer loans, and auto and leasing, as follows:
Mortgage loans: These loans are divided into four classes: traditional
mortgages, non-traditional mortgages, loans in loan modification programs and
home equity secured personal loans. Traditional mortgage loans include loans
secured by a dwelling, fixed coupons and regular amortization schedules.
Non-traditional mortgages include loans with interest-first amortization
schedules and loans with balloon considerations as part of their terms.
Mortgages in loan modification programs are loans that are being serviced under
such programs. Home equity loans are mainly equity lines of credit. The
allowance factor on mortgage loans is impacted by the adjusted historical loss
factors on the sub-segments and the environmental risk factors described above
and by delinquency buckets. The traditional mortgage loan portfolio is
further segregated by vintages and then by delinquency buckets. Effective on
the fourth quarter of 2018, the calculation of the loss factor was changed from
historical loss experience to a probability of default (“PD”) and loss given
default (“LGD”) methodology. The PD results from a delinquency migration
analysis and the LGD is based on the Bank’s historical loss experience. The
segments and sub-segments remained unchanged as well as the environmental risk
factors adjustments. These
changes are considered a change in accounting estimate as per ASC 250-10
provisions, where adjustments should be made prospectively.
Commercial
loans: The commercial portfolio is segmented by business line (corporate,
institutional, middle market, corporate retail, floor plan, and real estate)
and by collateral type (secured by real estate and other commercial and
industrial assets). The loss factor used for the GVA of these loans is
established considering Oriental's past 36-month historical loss experience of
each segment
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
adjusted for the loss realization period
and the consideration of environmental factors. The sum of the adjusted loss
experience and the environmental factors is the GVA factor used for the
determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses on each segment.
Consumer loans: The consumer portfolio consists of smaller retail loans
such as retail credit cards, overdrafts, unsecured personal lines of credit,
and personal unsecured loans. The allowance factor, consisting of the adjusted
historical loss factor and the environmental risk factors, will be calculated
for each sub-class of loans by delinquency bucket.
Auto
and Leasing: The auto and leasing portfolio consists of financing for the
purchase of new or used motor vehicles for private or public use. The allowance
factor is impacted by the adjusted historical loss factor and the environmental
risk factors. For the determination of the allowance factor, the
portfolio is segmented by FICO score, which is updated on a quarterly basis and
then by delinquency bucket.
Oriental
establishes its allowance for loan losses through a provision for credit losses
based on our evaluation of the credit quality of the loan portfolio. This evaluation,
which includes a review of loans on which full collectability may not be
reasonably assured, considers, among other matters, the estimated fair value of
the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical net loan loss
experience, and other factors that warrant recognition in determining our
allowance for loan losses. Oriental continues to monitor and modify the level
of the allowance for loan losses to ensure it is adequate to cover losses
inherent in our loan portfolio.
Our allowance for
loan losses consists of the following elements: (i) specific valuation
allowances based on probable losses on specifically identified impaired loans;
and (ii) valuation allowances based on net historical loan loss experience for
similar loans with similar inherent risk characteristics and performance
trends, adjusted, as appropriate, for qualitative risk factors specific to
respective loan types.
When current
information and events indicate that it is probable that we will be unable to
collect all amounts of principal and interest due under the original terms of a
business or commercial real estate loan greater than $500 thousand, such loan
will be classified as impaired. Additionally, all loans modified in a TDR are
considered impaired. The need for specific valuation allowances are determined
for impaired loans and recorded as necessary. For impaired loans, we consider
the fair value of the underlying collateral, less estimated costs to sell, if
the loan is collateral dependent, or we use the present value of estimated
future cash flows in determining the estimates of impairment and any related
allowance for loan losses for these loans. Confirmed losses are charged off
immediately.
Loan loss ratios and
credit risk categories, for commercial loans, are updated at least quarterly
and are applied in the context of GAAP. Management uses current available
information in estimating possible loan and lease losses, factors beyond
Oriental’s control, such as those affecting general economic conditions, may
require future changes to the allowance.
Acquired Loans Accounted for under ASC 310-30
(including those accounted for under ASC 310-30 by analogy)
For our acquired loans
accounted for under ASC 310-30, our allowance for loan losses is estimated
based upon our expected cash flows for these loans. To the extent that we
experience a deterioration in borrower credit quality resulting in a decrease
in the net present value of our expected cash flows (which are used as a proxy
to identify probable incurred losses) subsequent to the acquisition of the
loans, an allowance for loan losses is established based on our estimate of
future credit losses over the remaining life of the loans.
Acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30
are not considered non-performing and continue to have an accretable yield as
long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash
flows expected to be collected. Also, loans charged-off against the
non-accretable difference established in purchase accounting are not reported
as charge-offs. Charge-offs on loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are
recorded only to the extent that losses exceed the non-accretable difference
established with purchase accounting.
For the principal enhancements management made to its
methodology, refer to Note 7.
Troubled
Debt Restructuring
A TDR is the restructuring of a receivable in which
Oriental, as creditor, grants a concession for legal or economic reasons due to
the debtor’s financial difficulties. A concession is granted when, as a result
of the restructuring, Oriental does not expect to collect all
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
amounts due, including interest accrued at the original
contract rate. These concessions may include a reduction of the interest rate,
principal or accrued interest, extension of the maturity date or other actions
intended to minimize potential losses.
To assess whether the debtor is having financial
difficulties, Oriental evaluates whether it is probable that the debtor will
default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future.
Receivables that are restructured in a TDR are
presumed to be impaired and are subject to a specific impairment-measurement
method. If the payment of principal at original maturity is primarily dependent
on the value of collateral, Oriental considers the current value of that
collateral in determining whether the principal will be paid. For
non-collateral dependent loans, the specific reserve is calculated based on the
present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective
interest rate. An accruing loan that is modified in a TDR can remain in accrual
status if, based on a current, well-documented credit analysis, collection of
principal and interest in accordance with the modified terms is reasonably
assured, and the borrower has demonstrated sustained historical repayment
performance for a reasonable period before the modification.
Reserve
for Unfunded Commitments
The
reserve for unfunded commitments is maintained at a level believed by
management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to
unfunded credit facilities and is included in other liabilities in the
consolidated statements of financial condition. The determination of the
adequacy of the reserve is based upon an evaluation of the unfunded credit
facilities. Net adjustments to the reserve for unfunded commitments are
included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of
operations.
FDIC
Indemnification Asset and True-up Payment Obligation
The FDIC indemnification asset was
accounted for and measured separately from the covered loans acquired in the
FDIC-assisted acquisition as it was not contractually embedded in any of the
covered loans. The indemnification asset was recorded at fair value at the
acquisition date and represented the present value of the estimated cash
payments expected to be received from the FDIC for future losses on covered
assets based on the credit adjustment estimated for each covered asset and the
shared-loss percentages. This balance also included incurred expenses under the
shared-loss agreements. These cash flows were then discounted at a market-based
rate to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the shared-loss
reimbursements from the FDIC. The time value of money incorporated into the
present value computation was accreted into earnings over the shorter of the
life of the shared-loss agreements or the holding period of the covered assets.
The FDIC indemnification asset was reduced
as shared-loss payments were received from the FDIC. Realized credit losses in
excess of acquisition-date estimates resulted in an increase in the FDIC
indemnification asset. Conversely, if realized credit losses were less than
acquisition-date estimates, the FDIC indemnification asset was amortized
through the term of the shared-loss agreements.
The true-up
payment obligation associated with the loss share agreements was accounted for
at fair value in accordance with ASC Section 805-30-25-6 as it was considered
contingent consideration. The true-up payment obligation was included as part
of other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Any
changes in the carrying value of the obligation were included in the category
of FDIC loss share income (expense) in the consolidated statements of
operations.
On February 6,
2017, the Bank and the FDIC agreed to terminate the single family and
commercial shared-loss agreements related to the FDIC assisted acquisition of
Eurobank on April 30, 2010. As part of the loss share termination transaction,
the Bank made a payment of $10.1 million to the FDIC and
recorded a net benefit of $1.4 million. Such termination
payment took into account the anticipated reimbursements over the life of the
shared-loss agreements and the true-up payment liability of the Bank
anticipated at the end of the ten-year term of the single family shared-loss
agreement. All rights and obligations of the parties under the shared-loss
agreements terminated as of the closing date of the agreement.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Oriental’s goodwill
and other identifiable intangible assets having an indefinite useful life are
tested for impairment. Intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated for
impairment at least annually, and on a more frequent basis, if events or
circumstances indicate impairment could have taken place. Such events could
include, among others, a significant adverse change in the business climate, an
adverse action by a regulator, an unanticipated change in the competitive
environment and a decision to change the operations or dispose of a reporting
unit.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Under applicable accounting standards, goodwill impairment analysis is
a two-step test. Oriental has the option to first assess qualitative factors to
determine whether there are events or circumstances that exist that make it
more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its
carrying amount. If it is more likely than not that the fair value of the
reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, or if Oriental chooses to
bypass the qualitative assessment, Oriental compares each reporting unit's fair
value to its carrying value to identify potential impairment. If the estimated
fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the
reporting unit is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying amount of
the reporting unit were to exceed its estimated fair value, a second step would
be performed that would compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit's
goodwill with the carrying amount. The implied fair value of goodwill is
determined in the same manner as goodwill that is recognized in a business
combination. Significant judgment and estimates are involved in estimating the
fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting units. Oriental
performs annual goodwill impairment test as of October 31 and monitors for
interim triggering events on an ongoing basis. Oriental performed its annual
impairment review of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2018 and 2017 using
October 31, 2018 and 2017 as the annual evaluation dates and concluded that
there was no impairment at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Foreclosed
Real Estate and Other Repossessed Property
Foreclosed real estate and other repossessed property
are initially recorded at the fair value of the real estate or repossessed
property less the cost of selling it at the date of foreclosure or
repossession. At the time properties are acquired in full or partial
satisfaction of loans, any excess of the loan balance over the estimated fair
value of the property is charged against the allowance for loan and lease
losses on non-covered loans. After foreclosure or repossession, these
properties are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated cost
to sell based on recent appraised values or options to purchase the foreclosed
or repossessed property. Any excess of the carrying value over the estimated
fair value, less estimated costs to sell, is charged to non-interest expense.
The costs and expenses associated to holding these properties in portfolio are
expensed as incurred.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are carried at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful life of each type of asset. Amortization of
leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the
terms of the leases or estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is
shorter.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Oriental periodically reviews long-lived assets for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In performing the review for
recoverability, an estimate of the future cash flows expected to result from
the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is made. If the sum of the
future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the
carrying amount of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized. The amount of
the impairment is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the
asset. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, there was no indication of impairment
as a result of such review.
Income Taxes
In preparing the consolidated financial statements,
Oriental is required to estimate income taxes. This involves an estimate of
current income tax expense together with an assessment of deferred taxes
resulting from differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income
tax purposes. The determination of current income tax expense involves estimates
and assumptions that require Oriental to assume certain positions based on its
interpretation of current tax laws and regulations. Changes in assumptions
affecting estimates may be required in the future, and estimated tax assets or
liabilities may need to be increased or decreased accordingly. The accrual for
tax contingencies is adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances,
such as the progress of tax audits, case law and emerging legislation. When
particular matters arise, a number of years may elapse before such matters are
audited and finally resolved. Favorable resolution of such matters could be
recognized as a reduction to Oriental’s effective tax rate in the year of
resolution. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue could increase the
effective tax rate and may require the use of cash in such year.
The determination of deferred tax expense or benefit
is based on changes in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that
generate temporary differences. The carrying value of Oriental’s net deferred
tax assets assumes that Oriental will be able to generate sufficient future
taxable income based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and
related assumptions change in the future, Oriental may be required to record
valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets resulting in additional
income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Management evaluates on a regular basis whether the
deferred tax assets can be realized and assesses the need for a valuation
allowance. A valuation allowance is established when management believes that
it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will
not be realized. Changes in valuation allowance from period to period are
included in Oriental’s tax provision in the period of change.
In addition to valuation allowances, Oriental
establishes accruals for uncertain tax positions when, despite the belief that
Oriental’s tax return positions are fully supported, Oriental believes that
certain positions are likely to be challenged. The accruals for uncertain tax
positions are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as
the progress of tax audits, case law, and emerging legislation. The accruals
for Oriental’s uncertain tax positions are reflected as income tax payable as a
component of accrued expenses and other liabilities. These accruals are reduced
upon expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.
Oriental follows a two-step approach for recognizing
and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax
position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence
indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained
on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if
any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that
is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement.
Oriental’s policy is to include interest and penalties
related to unrecognized income tax benefits within the provision for income
taxes on the consolidated statements of operations.
Oriental is potentially subject to income tax audits
in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico for taxable years 2014 to 2017, until the
applicable statute of limitations expires. In addition, Oriental’s US
subsidiaries are potentially subject to income tax audits by the IRS for
taxable years 2015 to 2017. Tax audits by their nature are often complex and
can require several years to complete.
Revenue
Recognition
Refer to Note 28 for a detailed description
of the Corporation’s policies on the recognition and presentation of
revenues from contract with customers.
Equity-Based
Compensation Plan
Oriental’s 2007 Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as
amended and restated (the “Omnibus Plan”), provides for equity-based
compensation incentives through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock, restricted units and dividend equivalents, as well as
equity-based performance awards. The Omnibus Plan was adopted in 2007, amended
and restated in 2008, and further amended in 2010 and 2013.
The purpose of the Omnibus Plan is to provide
flexibility to Oriental to attract, retain and motivate directors, officers,
and key employees through the grant of awards based on performance and to
adjust its compensation practices to the best compensation practice and
corporate governance trends as they develop from time to time. The Omnibus Plan
is further intended to motivate high levels of individual performance coupled
with increased shareholder returns. Therefore, awards under the Omnibus Plan
(each, an “Award”) are intended to be based upon the recipient’s individual
performance, corporate performance, level of responsibility and potential to
make significant contributions to Oriental. Generally, the Omnibus Plan will
terminate as of (a) the date when no more of Oriental’s shares of common
stock are available for issuance under the Omnibus Plan or, (b) if earlier, the
date the Omnibus Plan is terminated by Oriental’s Board of Directors.
The Board’s Compensation Committee (the “Committee”),
or such other committee as the Board may designate, has full authority to
interpret and administer the Omnibus Plan in order to carry out its provisions
and purposes. The Committee has the authority to determine those persons
eligible to receive an Award and to establish the terms and conditions of any
Award. The Committee may delegate, subject to such terms or conditions or
guidelines as it shall determine, to any employee or group of employees any
portion of its authority and powers under the Omnibus Plan with respect to
participants who are not directors or executive officers subject to the
reporting requirements under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Only the Committee may exercise
authority in respect to Awards granted to such participants.
The expected term of stock options granted represents
the period of time that such options are expected to be outstanding. Expected
volatilities are based on historical volatility of Oriental’s shares of common
stock over the most recent period equal to the expected
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
term
of the stock options. For stock options issued during 2015, the expected
volatilities are based on both historical and implied volatility of Oriental’s
shares of common stock.
Oriental follows the fair value method of recording
stock-based compensation. Oriental used the modified prospective transition
method, which requires measurement of the cost of employee services received in
exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value
of the award with the cost to be recognized over the service period. It applies
to all awards unvested and granted after the effective date and awards
modified, repurchased, or cancelled after that date.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change
in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other
events and circumstances, except for those resulting from investments by owners
and distributions to owners. GAAP requires that recognized revenue, expenses,
gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets
and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale
securities and on derivative activities that qualify and are designated for
cash flows hedge accounting, net of taxes, are reported as a separate component
of the stockholders’ equity section of the consolidated statements of financial
condition, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive
income (loss).
Commitments and Contingencies
Liabilities
for loss contingencies, arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines,
and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a
liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably
estimated. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are
expensed as incurred.
Subsequent
Events
Oriental
has evaluated other events subsequent to the balance sheet date and prior to
the filing of this annual report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2018, and has adjusted and disclosed those
events that have occurred that would require adjustment or disclosure in the
consolidated financial statements.
New
Accounting Updates Not Yet Adopted
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured
Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark
Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes: The
amendments in this Update permit use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S.
benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815 in
addition to the UST, the LIBOR swap rate, the OIS rate based on the Fed Funds
Effective Rate, and the SIFMA Municipal Swap Rate. The adoption of this will
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures as we continue to use LIBOR.
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic
350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud
Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB
Emerging Issues Task Force). In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-15, which aligns the requirements for
capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a
service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs
incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements
that include an internal-use software license). Accordingly, ASU 2018-15
requires an entity (customer) in a hosting arrangement that is a service
contract to follow the guidance in Subtopic 350-40 to determine which
implementation costs to capitalize as an asset related to the service contract
and which costs to expense. The ASU also requires the entity (customer) to
expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a
service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement, which includes
reasonably certain renewals. This ASU is the final version of Proposed
Accounting Standards Update 2018–230—Intangibles—Goodwill and
Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for
Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a
Service Contract, which has been deleted. This ASU will be applied
prospectively for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU will
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes
to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. In
August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, which improves the effectiveness of
fair value measurement disclosures. ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure
requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement,
based on the concepts in FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for
Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Statements,
including the consideration of costs and benefits. This ASU is the final
version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2015-350—Fair Value Measurement
(Topic 820)—Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for
Fair Value Measurements, which has been deleted. This ASU will be applied
prospectively for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019. We assessed the impact that the adoption of ASU 2018-13 and
it will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and
related disclosures.
Simplifying the Test for
Goodwill Impairment. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2017-04, which simplifies the measurement of goodwill impairment. An entity
will no longer perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure
goodwill impairment. Instead, impairment will be measured using the difference
between the carrying amount and the fair value of the reporting unit. This ASU
will be applied prospectively for annual and interim periods in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this ASU will not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures
as the carrying amount of any of the reporting units do not exceeds its fair
value, if exceeds Oriental would be required to record an impairment charge for
the difference up to the amount of the goodwill.
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.
In December 18, 2018, a joint final rule was issued by the FRB, OCC and FDIC,
on the implementation and transition of the Current Expected Credit Loss
methodology (CECL). The rule differentiates implementation for Standardized and
Advanced Approaches banks and has implications for business combinations and
stress testing. The rule is largely in line with the proposal from April 2018.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, which includes an impairment
model (known as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model) that is based on
expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity
recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses. ASU No.
2016-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods, beginning after
December 15, 2019. Oriental will implement ASU No. 2016-13 on January 1, 2020 using a modified retrospective approach. Although early adoption
is permitted beginning in the first quarter of 2019, Oriental does not expect
to make that election. While we continue to assess the impact of ASU No.
2016-13, we have developed a roadmap with time schedules in place from 2016 to
implementation date. Oriental's cross-functional implementation team has
developed a project plan to ensure we comply with all updates from this ASU at
the time of adoption. We recently have selected the software and are in the
process of assessing the methodology to be used in order to develop an
acceptable model to estimate the expected credit losses. After the model has
been developed, reviewed and validated in accordance with our governance
policies, Oriental will keep disclosing relevant information of concerning
implementation process and impact of ASU No. 2016-13, as well as the updating
of policies, procedures and internal controls. Although Oriental expects the
allowance for credit losses to increase upon adoption with a corresponding
adjustment to retained earnings, the ultimate amount of the increase will
depend on the portfolio composition, credit quality, economic conditions and
reasonable and supportable forecasts at that time.
Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses: The
amendments in this Update include items brought to the Board’s attention by
stakeholders. The amendments align the implementation date for non-public
entities’ annual financial statements with the implementation date for their
interim financial statements and clarify the scope of the guidance in the
amendments in Update 2016-13. The amendment clarifies that receivables arising
from operating leases are not within the scope of Subtopic 326-20. Impairment
of receivables arising from operating leases will be accounted for in
accordance with Topic 842, Leases. Oriental does not estimate to have such
impairment in the near future. The adoption of this will not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2016-02, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, which requires lessees to recognize
a right-of-use (ROU) asset and related lease liability for leases classified as
operating leases at the commencement date that have lease terms of more than 12
months. The standard, effective January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted,
would have caused us to recognize virtually all leases on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets upon adoption and in the comparative period. However, in July
2018, the FASB issued an update to its guidance providing companies with the
option to adopt the provisions of the standard prospectively without adjusting
comparative periods; we will elect this option and adopt the standard on
January 1, 2019. The new standard provides a number of optional practical
expedients in transition. We have elected the ‘package of practical
expedients’, which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our prior
conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct
costs. We also have elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all
leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, we will not
recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing
ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets
in transition. Oriental’s leases primarily consist of leased office space.
Oriental expects to recognized ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating
leases in a range of $20 million to $25 million, with the most
significant impact from recognition of leased office space. No impact on equity,
results of operations and cash flows.
Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
Receivables. In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, which requires
the amortization of the premium on callable debt securities to the earliest call
date. The amortization period for callable
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
debt
securities purchased at a discount would not be impacted by the ASU. This ASU
will be applied prospectively for annual and interim periods in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2018. The ASU is not expected to have a material
impact on Oriental's consolidated financial position or results of operations.
At December 31, 2018, Oriental does not have callable debt securities.
New Accounting Updates Adopted During the Current Year
Codification Improvements. In July 2018,
the FASB issued ASU 2018-9, which represents changes to clarify the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”), correct unintended
application of guidance, or make minor improvements to the Codification that
are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or
create a significant administrative cost to most entities. Some of the
amendments make the Codification easier to understand and easier to apply by
eliminating inconsistencies, providing needed clarifications, and improving the
presentation of guidance in the Codification. The transition and effective date
guidance is based on the facts and circumstances of each amendment. Some of the
amendments in this ASU do not require transition guidance and will be effective
upon issuance of this ASU. However, many of the amendments in this ASU do have
transition guidance with effective dates for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2018, for public business entities. The Corporation does not
expect to be materially impacted by these Codification improvements.
Restricted Cash. In November 2016, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2016-18, which amends Topic 230 (Statement of Cash Flows) and requires
that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the
total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted
cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU No. 2016-18 is intended to reduce
diversity in practice in how restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents are
presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-18 is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods, beginning after December 15,
2017. The standard requires application using a retrospective transition
method. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-18 on January 1, 2018, changed the
presentation and classification of restricted cash and restricted cash
equivalents in our consolidated statements of cash flows.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which
supersedes the revenue recognition requirements Topic 605 (Revenue
Recognition), and most industry-specific guidance. ASU No. 2014-09 is based
on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or
services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the
entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU No.
2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing
and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts,
including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized
from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU No. 2014-09 permits
two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period
presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative
effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial
application (modified retrospective method). In August 2015, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2015-14 to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year to
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Oriental has adopted this ASU
on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. The adoption of Topic 606 did not have material impact to the
Company’s statement of operations or financial condition for the year ended
December 31, 2018. No cumulative effect adjustment to accumulated deficit was
recorded as a result of the adoption of Topic 606. Refer to
additional disclosures on Note 28, Banking and Financial Service Revenues.
NOTE 2 –
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS
Hurricanes
Irma and Maria
During 2017, Oriental was impacted by hurricanes Irma and
Maria, which struck the Island on September 7, 2017 and September 20, 2017,
respectively. Hurricane Maria caused catastrophic damages throughout Puerto
Rico, including homes, businesses, roads, bridges, power lines, commercial
establishments, and public facilities. It caused an unprecedented crisis when
it ravaged the Island’s electric power grid less than two weeks after hurricane
Irma left over a million Puerto Rico residents without power. For several
months after the hurricanes, a large part of Puerto Rico was without
electricity, many businesses were unable to operate, and government authorities
struggled to deliver emergency supplies and clean drinking water to many
communities outside the San Juan metropolitan area. Further, payment and
delivery systems, including the U.S. Post Office, were unable to operate for
weeks after hurricane Maria.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Almost all of Oriental’s
operations and clients are located in Puerto Rico. Although Oriental’s business
operations were disrupted by major damages to Puerto Rico’s critical
infrastructure, including its electric power grid and telecommunications
network, Oriental’s digital channels, core banking and electronic funds
transfer systems continued to function uninterrupted during and after the
hurricanes. Within days after hurricane Maria, and upon securing a continuing
supply of diesel fuel for its electric power generators, Oriental was able to
open its main offices and many of its branches and ATMs in addition to its
digital and phone trade channels.
As a result of this event and, based on current assessments
of information available for the impact of the hurricanes on our credit
portfolio, 2017 results included an additional loan loss provision of $32.4 million.
Oriental implemented its
disaster response plan as these storms approached its service areas. To operate
in disaster response mode, Oriental incurred expenses for, among other things,
buying diesel and generators for electric power, debris removal, security measures,
property damage mitigation, and emergency communication with customers
regarding the status of its banking operations. The estimated total non-credit
operating costs as of December 31, 2017 amounted to $6.6 million. No additional losses have been
incurred at December 31, 2018.
Oriental maintains insurance for casualty losses as well as
for disaster response costs and certain revenue lost through business interruption.
Oriental received a $1.0 million partial payment
from its insurance carrier during the year ended December 2017 and a $6.25 million payment during the
year ended December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2017, a receivable
of $1.2 million was included in
other assets, the remaining $5 million was recognized as
other non-interest income in the statement of operations during 2018.
NOTE 3 –
RESTRICTED CASH
The following table includes the composition of Oriental’s
restricted cash:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Cash
pledged as collateral to other financial institutions to secure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
Obligations under agreement of loans sold with recourse
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
$
|
3,030
|
|
$
|
3,030
|
At December 31, 2018, the Bank’s international banking entities, OIB and
Oriental Overseas, a division of the Bank, held an unencumbered certificate of
deposit and other short-term highly liquid securities in the amount of $305 thousand and $325 thousand, respectively, as
the legal reserve required for international banking entities under Puerto Rico
law. At December 31, 2017, the Bank’s international banking entities,
OIB and Oriental Overseas, a division of the Bank, held an unencumbered
certificate of deposit and other short-term highly liquid securities in the
amount of $300 thousand and $325 thousand, respectively, as
the legal reserve required for international banking entities under Puerto Rico
law. These instruments cannot be withdrawn or transferred by OIB
or Oriental Overseas without prior written approval of the Office of the
Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico (the "OCFI").
As part of its derivative
activities, Oriental has entered into collateral agreements with certain
financial counterparties. At both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Oriental had
delivered approximately $2.0 million of cash as collateral for such derivatives
activities.
Oriental has a contract with
FNMA which requires collateral to guarantee the repurchase, if necessary, of
loans sold with recourse. At both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Oriental
delivered as collateral cash amounting to approximately $1.1 million.
The Bank is required by Puerto
Rico law to maintain average weekly reserve balances to cover demand deposits.
The amount of those minimum average reserve balances for the week that covered
December 31, 2018 was $211.6 million (December 31, 2017
- $189.2 million). At December 31,
2018 and 2017, the Bank complied with this requirement. Cash and due from bank
as well as other short-term, highly liquid securities, are used to cover the
required average reserve balances.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 4 –
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Money
Market Investments
Oriental considers as cash
equivalents all money market instruments that are not pledged and that have
maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition. At December 31,
2018 and 2017, money market instruments included as part of cash and cash equivalents
amounted to $4.9 million and $7.0 million, respectively.
Investment
Securities
The amortized cost, gross
unrealized gains and losses, fair value, and weighted average yield of the
securities owned by Oriental at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Average
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
Yield
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
561,878
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
$
|
8,951
|
|
$
|
553,331
|
|
2.59%
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
211,947
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
210,170
|
|
3.10%
|
CMOs issued by US
government-sponsored agencies
|
|
66,230
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,166
|
|
|
64,064
|
|
1.90%
|
Total mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
840,055
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
13,944
|
|
|
827,565
|
|
2.66%
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury securities
|
|
10,924
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
10,805
|
|
1.36%
|
Obligations of US
government-sponsored agencies
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
2,265
|
|
1.38%
|
Other debt securities
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
2.99%
|
Total investment securities
|
|
14,456
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
14,292
|
|
1.50%
|
Total securities
available for sale
|
$
|
854,511
|
|
$
|
1,469
|
|
$
|
14,123
|
|
$
|
841,857
|
|
2.64%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
424,740
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
14,387
|
|
$
|
410,353
|
|
2.07%
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Average
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Value
|
|
Yield
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
383,194
|
|
$
|
1,402
|
|
$
|
2,881
|
|
$
|
381,715
|
|
2.39%
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
166,436
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
167,338
|
|
2.94%
|
CMOs issued by US
government-sponsored agencies
|
|
82,026
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
80,071
|
|
1.90%
|
Total mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
631,656
|
|
|
2,888
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
629,124
|
|
2.47%
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury securities
|
|
10,276
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
10,163
|
|
1.25%
|
Obligations of US
government-sponsored agencies
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
1.38%
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico
government and
public instrumentalities
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
5.55%
|
Other debt securities
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
2.97%
|
Total investment securities
|
|
17,144
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
16,673
|
|
2.04%
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
$
|
648,800
|
|
$
|
2,940
|
|
$
|
5,943
|
|
$
|
645,797
|
|
2.46%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
506,064
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
8,383
|
|
$
|
497,681
|
|
2.07%
|
The amortized cost and fair value of Oriental’s
investment securities at December 31, 2018, by contractual maturity, are shown
in the next table. Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date,
such as collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of
final contractual maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations
with or without call or prepayment penalties.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
Held-to-maturity
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
3,617
|
|
$
|
3,570
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Total due from 1 to 5 years
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
3,570
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Due after 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMOs issued by US government-sponsored agencies
|
$
|
58,221
|
|
$
|
56,202
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
|
253,447
|
|
|
249,808
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total due after 5 to 10 years
|
|
311,668
|
|
|
306,010
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Due after 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
304,814
|
|
$
|
299,953
|
|
$
|
424,740
|
|
$
|
410,353
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
211,947
|
|
|
210,170
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
CMOs issued by US government-sponsored agencies
|
|
8,009
|
|
|
7,862
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total due after 10 years
|
|
524,770
|
|
|
517,985
|
|
|
424,740
|
|
|
410,353
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
840,055
|
|
|
827,565
|
|
|
424,740
|
|
|
410,353
|
Investment
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due less than one year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury securities
|
$
|
10,924
|
|
$
|
10,805
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Total due in less than one year
|
|
10,924
|
|
|
10,805
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Due from 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of US government-sponsored agencies
|
$
|
2,325
|
|
$
|
2,265
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Other debt securities
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total due from 1 to 5 years
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Due from 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total due after 5 to 10 years
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total investment securities
|
|
14,456
|
|
|
14,292
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
$
|
854,511
|
|
$
|
841,857
|
|
$
|
424,740
|
|
$
|
410,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
During the year ended December
31, 2018, Oriental retained securitized GNMA pools totaling $56.8 million amortized cost, at
a yield of 3.93% from its own originations
while during the year ended December 31, 2017 that amount totaled $74.9 million amortized cost, at
a yield of 3.14%. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, that amount totaled $112.2 million, amortized cost,
at a yield of 2.89%.
During
the year ended December 31, 2018, Oriental sold $17.8 million of
available-for-sale Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”)
certificates from its recurring mortgage loan origination and securitization
activities. These sales did not realize any gains or losses during such period.
During the year ended December
31, 2017, Oriental sold $166.0 million of
mortgage-backed securities and $84.1 million of US Treasury securities, and
recorded a net gain on sale of securities of $6.9 million. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Oriental sold $277.2 million of mortgage-backed securities and $11.1
million of Puerto Rico government bonds, and recorded a net gain on sale of
securities of $12.2 million.
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
Sale Price
|
|
at Sale
|
|
Gross Gains
|
|
Gross Losses
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Sale
of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates
|
$
|
17,837
|
|
$
|
17,837
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Total
|
$
|
17,837
|
|
$
|
17,837
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
Sale Price
|
|
at Sale
|
|
Gross Gains
|
|
Gross Losses
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Sale
of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
107,510
|
|
$
|
102,311
|
|
$
|
5,199
|
|
$
|
-
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
65,284
|
|
|
63,704
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
-
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury securities
|
|
84,202
|
|
|
84,085
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
-
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
256,996
|
|
$
|
250,100
|
|
$
|
6,896
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
Sale Price
|
|
at Sale
|
|
Gross Gains
|
|
Gross Losses
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Sale
of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
293,505
|
|
$
|
277,181
|
|
$
|
16,324
|
|
$
|
-
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of PR government and public instrumentalities
|
|
6,978
|
|
|
11,095
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,117
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
300,483
|
|
$
|
288,276
|
|
$
|
16,324
|
|
$
|
4,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The following tables show Oriental’s gross unrealized
losses and fair value of investment securities available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and the length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at
December 31, 2018 and 2017:
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
12 months or
more
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
|
Loss
|
|
Value
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMOs issued by US
Government-sponsored agencies
|
$
|
66,230
|
|
$
|
2,166
|
|
$
|
64,064
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
|
357,955
|
|
|
8,603
|
|
|
349,352
|
Obligations of US Government and
sponsored agencies
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
2,265
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
131,044
|
|
|
2,739
|
|
|
128,305
|
US Treasury Securities
|
|
9,977
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
9,858
|
|
$
|
567,531
|
|
$
|
13,687
|
|
$
|
553,844
|
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
424,740
|
|
$
|
14,387
|
|
$
|
410,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12
months
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
|
Loss
|
|
Value
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
|
109,772
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
109,424
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
17,126
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
17,038
|
US Treasury Securities
|
|
323
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
323
|
|
$
|
127,221
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
$
|
126,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
|
Loss
|
|
Value
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMOs issued by US
government-sponsored agencies
|
$
|
66,230
|
|
$
|
2,166
|
|
$
|
64,064
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
|
467,727
|
|
|
8,951
|
|
|
458,776
|
Obligations of US government and
sponsored agencies
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
2,265
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
148,170
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
145,343
|
US Treausury Securities
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
10,181
|
|
$
|
694,752
|
|
$
|
14,123
|
|
$
|
680,629
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
424,740
|
|
$
|
14,387
|
|
$
|
410,353
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
|
Loss
|
|
Value
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMOs issued by US Government-sponsored agencies
|
$
|
72,562
|
|
$
|
1,857
|
|
$
|
70,705
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
|
111,635
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
109,513
|
Obligations of US Government and sponsored agencies
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
2,879
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico government and public instrumentalities
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
2,093
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
20,803
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
20,304
|
US Treasury Securities
|
|
9,952
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
9,839
|
|
$
|
220,334
|
|
$
|
5,001
|
|
$
|
215,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
352,399
|
|
|
7,264
|
|
|
345,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
|
Loss
|
|
Value
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMOs issued by US Government-sponsored agencies
|
|
9,464
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
9,366
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
|
125,107
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
124,348
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
14,001
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
13,916
|
US Treasury Securities
|
|
324
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
324
|
|
$
|
148,896
|
|
$
|
942
|
|
$
|
147,954
|
Securities
held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
153,665
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
$
|
152,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
|
Loss
|
|
Value
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMOs issued by US Government-sponsored agencies
|
|
82,026
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
80,071
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
|
236,742
|
|
|
2,881
|
|
|
233,861
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico government and public instrumentalities
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
2,093
|
Obligations of US government and sponsored agencies
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
2,879
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
34,804
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
34,220
|
US Treausury Securities
|
|
10,276
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
10,163
|
|
$
|
369,230
|
|
$
|
5,943
|
|
$
|
363,287
|
Securities
held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA and FHLMC certificates
|
$
|
506,064
|
|
$
|
8,383
|
|
$
|
497,681
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Oriental performs
valuations of the investment securities on a monthly basis. Moreover, Oriental
conducts quarterly reviews to identify and evaluate each investment in an
unrealized loss position for other-than-temporary impairment. Any portion of a
decline in value associated with credit loss is recognized in the statements of
operations with the remaining noncredit-related component recognized in other
comprehensive income (loss). A credit loss is determined by assessing whether
the amortized cost basis of the security will be recovered by comparing the
present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security,
discounted at the rate equal to the yield used to accrete current and
prospective beneficial interest for the security. The shortfall of the present
value of the cash flows expected to be collected in relation to the amortized cost
basis is considered to be the “credit loss.” Other-than-temporary impairment
analysis is based on estimates that depend on market conditions and are subject
to further change over time. In addition, while Oriental believes that the
methodology used to value these exposures is reasonable, the methodology is
subject to continuing improvement, including those made as a result of market
developments. Consequently, it is reasonably possible that changes in estimates
or conditions could result in the need to recognize additional
other-than-temporary impairment charges in the future.
All of the investments ($1.1 billion, amortized cost)
with an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2018 consist of securities
issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury or U.S. government-sponsored
agencies, all of which are highly liquid securities that have a large and
efficient secondary market. Their aggregate losses and their variability from
period to period are the result of changes in market conditions, and not due to
the repayment capacity or creditworthiness of the issuers or guarantors of such
securities.
The following table
presents a rollforward of credit-related impairment losses recognized in
earnings for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 on available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
Reductions
for securities sold during the period (realized)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,490)
|
|
Additions
from credit losses recognized on available-for-sale securities that had no
previous impairment losses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance
at end of year
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
NOTE 5 - PLEDGED ASSETS
The following table shows a
summary of pledged and not pledged assets at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Investment securities available for sale are presented at fair value, and
investment securities held-to-maturity, residential mortgage loans, commercial
loans and leases are presented at amortized cost:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Pledged
investment securities to secure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
$
|
487,181
|
|
$
|
205,484
|
Derivatives
|
|
423
|
|
|
1,478
|
Bond for the Bank's trust operations
|
|
322
|
|
|
341
|
Puerto Rico public fund deposits
|
|
141,162
|
|
|
22,948
|
Total pledged investment securities
|
|
629,088
|
|
|
230,251
|
Pledged
residential mortgage loans to secure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
880,591
|
|
|
971,772
|
Pledged
commercial loans to secure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
275,451
|
|
|
305,346
|
Federal Reserve Bank Credit Facility
|
|
651
|
|
|
993
|
Puerto Rico public fund deposits
|
|
140,123
|
|
|
150,036
|
|
|
416,225
|
|
|
456,375
|
Total pledged assets
|
$
|
1,925,904
|
|
$
|
1,658,398
|
Financial
assets not pledged:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
$
|
637,509
|
|
$
|
921,610
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
354,868
|
|
|
325,698
|
Commercial loans
|
|
1,414,054
|
|
|
1,152,151
|
Consumer loans
|
|
373,814
|
|
|
361,497
|
Auto loans and leases
|
|
1,148,535
|
|
|
949,650
|
Total assets not pledged
|
$
|
3,928,780
|
|
$
|
3,710,606
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 6 - LOANS
Oriental’s
loan portfolio is composed of two segments, loans initially accounted for under
the amortized cost method (referred to as "originated and other"
loans) and loans acquired (referred to as "acquired" loans). Acquired
loans are further segregated between acquired BBVAPR loans and acquired
Eurobank loans.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The composition of Oriental’s loan
portfolio at December 31, 2018 and
2017 was as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Originated and other loans and leases
held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
668,809
|
|
$
|
683,607
|
Commercial
|
|
1,597,588
|
|
|
1,307,261
|
Consumer
|
|
348,980
|
|
|
330,039
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
1,129,695
|
|
|
883,985
|
|
|
3,745,072
|
|
|
3,204,892
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses on originated and other loans and leases
|
|
(95,188)
|
|
|
(92,718)
|
|
|
3,649,884
|
|
|
3,112,174
|
Deferred loan costs, net
|
|
7,740
|
|
|
6,695
|
Total originated and other loans
held for investment, net
|
|
3,657,624
|
|
|
3,118,869
|
Acquired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired BBVAPR loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounted for under ASC 310-20
(Loans with revolving feature and/or
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquired at a premium)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
4,380
|
Consumer
|
|
23,988
|
|
|
28,915
|
Auto
|
|
4,435
|
|
|
21,969
|
|
|
30,969
|
|
|
55,264
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses on acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for under ASC 310-20
|
|
(2,062)
|
|
|
(3,862)
|
|
|
28,907
|
|
|
51,402
|
Accounted for under ASC 310-30
(Loans acquired with deteriorated
|
|
|
|
|
|
credit quality, including those
by analogy)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
492,890
|
|
|
532,053
|
Commercial
|
|
182,319
|
|
|
243,092
|
Consumer
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,431
|
Auto
|
|
14,403
|
|
|
43,696
|
|
|
689,612
|
|
|
820,272
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses on acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for under ASC 310-30
|
|
(42,010)
|
|
|
(45,755)
|
|
|
647,602
|
|
|
774,517
|
Total acquired BBVAPR loans, net
|
|
676,509
|
|
|
825,919
|
Acquired Eurobank loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans secured by 1-4 family
residential properties
|
|
63,392
|
|
|
69,538
|
Commercial
|
|
47,826
|
|
|
53,793
|
Consumer
|
|
846
|
|
|
1,112
|
Total acquired Eurobank loans
|
|
112,064
|
|
|
124,443
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses on Eurobank loans
|
|
(24,971)
|
|
|
(25,174)
|
Total acquired Eurobank loans, net
|
|
87,093
|
|
|
99,269
|
Total acquired loans, net
|
|
763,602
|
|
|
925,188
|
Total held for investment, net
|
|
4,421,226
|
|
|
4,044,057
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
|
|
10,368
|
|
|
12,272
|
Total loans, net
|
$
|
4,431,594
|
|
$
|
4,056,329
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
As a result of the devastation caused by hurricanes
Irma and Maria, Oriental offered an automatic three-month moratorium for the
payment due on certain loans. The level of delinquencies for mortgage and auto
loans as of December 31, 2017 was impacted by the loan moratorium. Aging of
current and early delinquent loans in moratorium were frozen at September 30,
2017, throughout the moratorium period. In addition, although the repayment
schedule was modified as part of the moratorium, certain borrowers continued to
make payments shortly after the moratorium, having an impact on the respective
delinquency status at December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2018, all of the loan
moratoriums have expired, and total delinquency levels have returned to
pre-hurricane levels with some improvements.
Originated and Other Loans and Leases Held for Investment
Oriental’s originated and
other loans held for investment are encompassed within four portfolio segments:
mortgage, commercial, consumer, and auto and leasing.
The tables below present the
aging of the recorded investment in gross originated and other loans held for
investment at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
by class of loans. Mortgage
loans past due include delinquent loans in the GNMA buy-back option program.
Servicers of loans underlying GNMA mortgage-backed securities must report as
their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the option (but not the
obligation) to repurchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due and
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
90+ Days
|
|
Total Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Due
|
|
Current
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
Accruing
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional (by origination year):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to the year 2002
|
$
|
77
|
|
$
|
1,516
|
|
$
|
2,707
|
|
$
|
4,300
|
|
$
|
36,344
|
|
$
|
40,644
|
|
$
|
168
|
Years 2003 and 2004
|
|
91
|
|
|
2,412
|
|
|
5,632
|
|
|
8,135
|
|
|
67,707
|
|
|
75,842
|
|
|
-
|
Year 2005
|
|
-
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
35,004
|
|
|
39,087
|
|
|
-
|
Year 2006
|
|
255
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
7,022
|
|
|
49,213
|
|
|
56,235
|
|
|
-
|
Years 2007, 2008
and 2009
|
|
255
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
6,677
|
|
|
7,991
|
|
|
52,781
|
|
|
60,772
|
|
|
56
|
Years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
|
|
253
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
8,697
|
|
|
9,278
|
|
|
104,429
|
|
|
113,707
|
|
|
270
|
Years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and
2018
|
|
-
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
139,500
|
|
|
141,445
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
8,043
|
|
|
33,780
|
|
|
42,754
|
|
|
484,978
|
|
|
527,732
|
|
|
494
|
Non-traditional
|
|
-
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
3,201
|
|
|
11,072
|
|
|
14,273
|
|
|
-
|
Loss mitigation program
|
|
10,793
|
|
|
6,258
|
|
|
19,389
|
|
|
36,440
|
|
|
70,393
|
|
|
106,833
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
|
11,724
|
|
|
14,417
|
|
|
56,254
|
|
|
82,395
|
|
|
566,443
|
|
|
648,838
|
|
|
2,717
|
Home equity secured personal loans
|
|
9
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
-
|
GNMA's buy-back option program
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
19,721
|
|
|
19,721
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
19,721
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
|
14,417
|
|
|
75,975
|
|
|
102,125
|
|
|
566,684
|
|
|
668,809
|
|
|
2,717
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
289,052
|
|
|
289,052
|
|
|
-
|
Institutional
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
68,413
|
|
|
69,613
|
|
|
-
|
Middle market
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
5,202
|
|
|
6,632
|
|
|
200,831
|
|
|
207,463
|
|
|
-
|
Retail
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
8,570
|
|
|
10,674
|
|
|
213,440
|
|
|
224,114
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
-
|
Real estate
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
19,009
|
|
|
19,009
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
|
14,972
|
|
|
18,506
|
|
|
794,929
|
|
|
813,435
|
|
|
-
|
Other commercial and industrial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
179,885
|
|
|
179,885
|
|
|
-
|
Institutional
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
156,410
|
|
|
156,410
|
|
|
-
|
Middle market
|
|
917
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
6,020
|
|
|
6,937
|
|
|
81,030
|
|
|
87,967
|
|
|
-
|
Retail
|
|
571
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
308,278
|
|
|
310,212
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
49,633
|
|
|
49,679
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
6,883
|
|
|
8,917
|
|
|
775,236
|
|
|
784,153
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
21,855
|
|
|
27,423
|
|
|
1,570,165
|
|
|
1,597,588
|
|
|
-
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due and
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
90+ Days
|
|
Total Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Due
|
|
Current
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
Accruing
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
$
|
725
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
$
|
1,499
|
|
$
|
26,535
|
|
$
|
28,034
|
|
$
|
-
|
Overdrafts
|
|
10
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
-
|
Personal lines of credit
|
|
57
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
-
|
Personal loans
|
|
3,966
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
6,968
|
|
|
296,151
|
|
|
303,119
|
|
|
-
|
Cash collateral personal loans
|
|
74
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
15,280
|
|
|
15,696
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,832
|
|
|
2,453
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
|
8,983
|
|
|
339,997
|
|
|
348,980
|
|
|
-
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
58,094
|
|
|
27,945
|
|
|
13,494
|
|
|
99,533
|
|
|
1,030,162
|
|
|
1,129,695
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
$
|
77,788
|
|
$
|
47,254
|
|
$
|
113,022
|
|
$
|
238,064
|
|
$
|
3,507,008
|
|
$
|
3,745,072
|
|
$
|
2,717
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due and
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
90+ Days
|
|
Total Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Due
|
|
Current
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
Accruing
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional (by origination year):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to the year 2002
|
$
|
86
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
$
|
3,537
|
|
$
|
4,561
|
|
$
|
41,579
|
|
$
|
46,140
|
|
$
|
467
|
Years 2003 and 2004
|
|
92
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
|
6,304
|
|
|
7,473
|
|
|
75,758
|
|
|
83,231
|
|
|
-
|
Year 2005
|
|
101
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
|
40,669
|
|
|
44,501
|
|
|
68
|
Year 2006
|
|
242
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
5,971
|
|
|
6,817
|
|
|
55,966
|
|
|
62,783
|
|
|
66
|
Years 2007, 2008
and 2009
|
|
358
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
8,561
|
|
|
10,177
|
|
|
58,505
|
|
|
68,682
|
|
|
577
|
Years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
|
|
233
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
7,393
|
|
|
8,604
|
|
|
116,674
|
|
|
125,278
|
|
|
1,202
|
Years 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017
|
|
-
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
121,194
|
|
|
122,918
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
5,313
|
|
|
36,763
|
|
|
43,188
|
|
|
510,345
|
|
|
553,533
|
|
|
2,380
|
Non-traditional
|
|
-
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
3,543
|
|
|
3,869
|
|
|
14,401
|
|
|
18,270
|
|
|
-
|
Loss mitigation program
|
|
7,233
|
|
|
3,331
|
|
|
18,923
|
|
|
29,487
|
|
|
73,793
|
|
|
103,280
|
|
|
4,981
|
|
|
8,345
|
|
|
8,970
|
|
|
59,229
|
|
|
76,544
|
|
|
598,539
|
|
|
675,083
|
|
|
7,361
|
Home equity secured personal loans
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
-
|
GNMA's buy-back option program
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8,345
|
|
|
8,970
|
|
|
67,497
|
|
|
84,812
|
|
|
598,795
|
|
|
683,607
|
|
|
7,361
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
235,426
|
|
|
235,426
|
|
|
-
|
Institutional
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
44,648
|
|
|
44,766
|
|
|
-
|
Middle market
|
|
765
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,527
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
|
225,649
|
|
|
229,941
|
|
|
-
|
Retail
|
|
352
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
9,695
|
|
|
10,983
|
|
|
235,084
|
|
|
246,067
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,998
|
|
|
3,998
|
|
|
-
|
Real estate
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
17,556
|
|
|
17,556
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,117
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
13,340
|
|
|
15,393
|
|
|
762,361
|
|
|
777,754
|
|
|
-
|
Other commercial and industrial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
170,015
|
|
|
170,015
|
|
|
-
|
Institutional
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
125,591
|
|
|
125,591
|
|
|
-
|
Middle market
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
84,482
|
|
|
85,363
|
|
|
-
|
Retail
|
|
455
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
111,078
|
|
|
113,252
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
9
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
35,226
|
|
|
35,286
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
3,115
|
|
|
526,392
|
|
|
529,507
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
15,888
|
|
|
18,508
|
|
|
1,288,753
|
|
|
1,307,261
|
|
|
-
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due and
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
90+ Days
|
|
Total Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Due
|
|
Current
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
Accruing
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
$
|
246
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
$
|
1,603
|
|
$
|
26,827
|
|
$
|
28,430
|
|
$
|
-
|
Overdrafts
|
|
20
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
-
|
Personal lines of credit
|
|
259
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
-
|
Personal loans
|
|
3,778
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
5,495
|
|
|
278,982
|
|
|
284,477
|
|
|
-
|
Cash collateral personal loans
|
|
103
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
14,224
|
|
|
14,698
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,406
|
|
|
1,743
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
8,029
|
|
|
322,010
|
|
|
330,039
|
|
|
-
|
Auto
and leasing
|
|
21,760
|
|
|
10,399
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
36,391
|
|
|
847,594
|
|
|
883,985
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
$
|
36,092
|
|
$
|
22,151
|
|
$
|
89,497
|
|
$
|
147,740
|
|
$
|
3,057,152
|
|
$
|
3,204,892
|
|
$
|
7,361
|
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Oriental had a carrying
balance of $91.4 million and $94.9 million, respectively, in
originated and other loans held for investment granted to the Puerto Rico
government, including its instrumentalities, public corporations and
municipalities as part of the institutional commercial loan segment. All originated
and other loans granted to the Puerto Rico government are general obligations
of municipalities secured by ad valorem taxation, without limitation as to rate
or amount, on all taxable property within the issuing municipalities. The good
faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of each issuing municipality are
pledged for the payment of its general obligations.
Acquired Loans
Acquired loans were initially
measured at fair value and subsequently accounted for under either ASC 310-30
or ASC 310-20 (Non-refundable fees and Other Costs). We have acquired loans in
the acquisitions of BBVAPR and Eurobank.
Acquired BBVAPR Loans
Accounted for under ASC 310-20 (Loans with revolving feature and/or
acquired at a premium)
Credit cards,
retail and commercial revolving lines of credits, floor plans and performing
auto loans with FICO scores over 660 acquired at a premium are accounted for under the guidance of ASC 310-20,
which requires that any contractually required loan payment receivable in
excess of Oriental’s initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest
income on a level-yield basis over the life of the loan. Loans accounted for
under ASC 310-20 are placed on non-accrual status when past due in accordance
with Oriental’s non-accrual policy, and any accretion of discount or
amortization of premium is discontinued. Acquired BBVAPR loans that were
accounted for under the provisions of ASC 310-20 are removed from the acquired
loan category at the end of the reporting period upon refinancing, renewal or
normal re-underwriting.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The
following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in gross acquired
BBVAPR loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, by class of loans:
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due and
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
90+ Days
|
|
Total Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Due
|
|
Current
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
Accruing
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
$
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
-
|
Other commercial and industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
30
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
-
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
499
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
20,796
|
|
|
21,822
|
|
|
-
|
Personal loans
|
|
64
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
2,166
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
22,848
|
|
|
23,988
|
|
|
-
|
Auto
|
|
405
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
3,589
|
|
|
4,435
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
$
|
998
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
$
|
2,977
|
|
$
|
27,992
|
|
$
|
30,969
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due and
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
90+ Days
|
|
Total Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Due
|
|
Current
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
Accruing
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
$
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
-
|
Other commercial and industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
36
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
2,681
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
2,681
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
3,074
|
|
|
4,380
|
|
|
-
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
208
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
24,822
|
|
|
26,467
|
|
|
-
|
Personal loans
|
|
139
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
2,448
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
27,025
|
|
|
28,915
|
|
|
-
|
Auto
|
|
602
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
20,940
|
|
|
21,969
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
$
|
985
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
$
|
2,804
|
|
$
|
4,225
|
|
$
|
51,039
|
|
$
|
55,264
|
|
$
|
-
|
Acquired
BBVAPR Loans Accounted for under ASC 310-30 (including those accounted for
under ASC 310-30 by analogy)
Acquired BBVAPR
loans, except for credit cards, retail and commercial revolving lines of
credits, floor plans and performing auto loans with FICO scores over 660
acquired at a premium, are accounted for by Oriental in accordance with ASC
310-30.
The carrying amount corresponding to acquired BBVAPR loans with
deteriorated credit quality, including those accounted under ASC 310-30 by
analogy, in the statements of financial condition at December 31, 2018 and
2017 is as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Contractual required payments
receivable:
|
$
|
1,304,545
|
|
$
|
1,481,616
|
Less: Non-accretable discount
|
|
345,423
|
|
|
352,431
|
Cash expected to be collected
|
|
959,122
|
|
|
1,129,185
|
Less: Accretable yield
|
|
269,510
|
|
|
308,913
|
Carrying amount, gross
|
|
689,612
|
|
|
820,272
|
Less: allowance for loan and lease
losses
|
|
42,010
|
|
|
45,755
|
Carrying amount, net
|
$
|
647,602
|
|
$
|
774,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Oriental had $44.5 million and $50.3 million, respectively, in
loans granted to Puerto Rico municipalities as part of its acquired BBVAPR
loans accounted for under ASC 310-30. These loans are primarily secured municipal general
obligations.
The following tables describe the accretable yield and
non-accretable discount activity of
acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Auto
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Accretable Yield Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
258,498
|
|
$
|
46,764
|
|
$
|
2,766
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
$
|
308,913
|
Accretion
|
|
(27,248)
|
|
|
(14,160)
|
|
|
(2,360)
|
|
|
(871)
|
|
|
(44,639)
|
Change in expected cash flows
|
|
-
|
|
|
7,895
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
9,269
|
Transfer (to) non-accretable
discount
|
|
949
|
|
|
(3,991)
|
|
|
(1,053)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
(4,033)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
232,199
|
|
$
|
36,508
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
$
|
560
|
|
$
|
269,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accretable Discount Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
299,501
|
|
$
|
10,596
|
|
$
|
23,050
|
|
$
|
19,284
|
|
$
|
352,431
|
Change in actual and expected losses
|
|
(6,665)
|
|
|
(4,241)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
(277)
|
|
|
(11,041)
|
Transfer from accretable yield
|
|
(949)
|
|
|
3,991
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
(62)
|
|
|
4,033
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
291,887
|
|
$
|
10,346
|
|
$
|
24,245
|
|
$
|
18,945
|
|
$
|
345,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Auto
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Accretable Yield Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
292,115
|
|
$
|
50,366
|
|
$
|
8,538
|
|
$
|
3,682
|
|
$
|
354,701
|
Accretion
|
|
(30,205)
|
|
|
(20,572)
|
|
|
(6,339)
|
|
|
(1,841)
|
|
|
(58,957)
|
Change in actual and expected losses
|
|
2
|
|
|
22,250
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
22,565
|
Transfer (to) from non-accretable
discount
|
|
(3,414)
|
|
|
(5,280)
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
(1,099)
|
|
|
(9,396)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
258,498
|
|
$
|
46,764
|
|
$
|
2,766
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
$
|
308,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accretable Discount Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
305,615
|
|
$
|
16,965
|
|
$
|
22,407
|
|
$
|
18,120
|
|
$
|
363,107
|
Change in actual and expected losses
|
|
(9,528)
|
|
|
(11,649)
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
(20,072)
|
Transfer from (to) accretable yield
|
|
3,414
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
(397)
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
9,396
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
299,501
|
|
$
|
10,596
|
|
$
|
23,050
|
|
$
|
19,284
|
|
$
|
352,431
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Auto
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Accretable Yield Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
268,794
|
|
$
|
65,026
|
|
$
|
21,578
|
|
$
|
6,290
|
|
$
|
361,688
|
Accretion
|
|
(32,834)
|
|
|
(26,254)
|
|
|
(13,567)
|
|
|
(2,982)
|
|
|
(75,637)
|
Change in actual and expected losses
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
14,259
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
(242)
|
|
|
15,267
|
Transfer (to) from non-accretable
discount
|
|
56,156
|
|
|
(2,665)
|
|
|
(724)
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
53,383
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
292,115
|
|
$
|
50,366
|
|
$
|
8,538
|
|
$
|
3,682
|
|
$
|
354,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accretable Discount Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
374,772
|
|
$
|
18,545
|
|
$
|
22,039
|
|
$
|
18,834
|
|
$
|
434,190
|
Change in actual and expected losses
|
|
(13,001)
|
|
|
(4,245)
|
|
|
(356)
|
|
|
(98)
|
|
|
(17,700)
|
Transfer from (to) accretable yield
|
|
(56,156)
|
|
|
2,665
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
(616)
|
|
|
(53,383)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
305,615
|
|
$
|
16,965
|
|
$
|
22,407
|
|
$
|
18,120
|
|
$
|
363,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Acquired Eurobank Loans
The carrying amount of
acquired Eurobank loans at December 31,
2018 and 2017 is as follows:
|
December 31
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Contractual required payments
receivable:
|
$
|
156,722
|
|
$
|
179,960
|
Less: Non-accretable discount
|
|
2,959
|
|
|
5,845
|
Cash expected to be collected
|
|
153,763
|
|
|
174,115
|
Less: Accretable yield
|
|
41,699
|
|
|
49,672
|
Carrying amount, gross
|
|
112,064
|
|
|
124,443
|
Less: Allowance for loan and lease
losses
|
|
24,971
|
|
|
25,174
|
Carrying amount, net
|
$
|
87,093
|
|
$
|
99,269
|
The following tables describe the accretable yield and
non-accretable discount activity of acquired Eurobank loans for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
Loans Secured
by 1-4 Family Residential Properties
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Construction
& Development Secured by 1-4 Family Residential Properties
|
|
Leasing
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Accretable Yield Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
41,474
|
|
$
|
6,751
|
|
$
|
1,447
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
49,672
|
Accretion
|
|
(5,964)
|
|
|
(6,430)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(52)
|
|
|
(389)
|
|
|
(12,835)
|
Change in expected cash flows
|
|
(1,129)
|
|
|
5,023
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(329)
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
4,265
|
Transfer from (to) non-accretable
discount
|
|
3,353
|
|
|
(2,034)
|
|
|
(792)
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
(311)
|
|
|
597
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
37,734
|
|
$
|
3,310
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
41,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accretable Discount Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
4,576
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
$
|
758
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
$
|
5,845
|
Change in actual and expected losses
|
|
53
|
|
|
(2,310)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
(413)
|
|
|
(2,289)
|
Transfer from (to) accretable yield
|
|
(3,353)
|
|
|
2,034
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
(381)
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
(597)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
1,276
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
1,550
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Loans Secured
by 1-4 Family Residential Properties
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Construction
& Development Secured by 1-4 Family Residential Properties
|
|
Leasing
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Accretable Yield Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
45,839
|
|
$
|
16,475
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
64,508
|
Accretion
|
|
(7,180)
|
|
|
(12,985)
|
|
|
(82)
|
|
|
(30)
|
|
|
(283)
|
|
|
(20,560)
|
Change in actual and expected losses
|
|
121
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
(217)
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
2,665
|
Transfer from (to) non-accretable
discount
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
(786)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
(476)
|
|
|
3,059
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
41,474
|
|
$
|
6,751
|
|
$
|
1,447
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
49,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accretable Discount Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
8,441
|
|
$
|
3,880
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
$
|
12,340
|
Change in actual and expected losses
|
|
(1,171)
|
|
|
(2,224)
|
|
|
(39)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
(249)
|
|
|
(3,436)
|
Transfer (to) from accretable yield
|
|
(2,694)
|
|
|
(1,380)
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
(247)
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
(3,059)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
4,576
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
$
|
758
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
$
|
5,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Loans Secured
by 1-4 Family Residential Properties
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Construction
& Development Secured by 1-4 Family Residential Properties
|
|
Leasing
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Accretable Yield Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
51,954
|
|
$
|
26,970
|
|
$
|
2,255
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
3,212
|
|
$
|
84,391
|
Accretion
|
|
(8,942)
|
|
|
(19,593)
|
|
|
(90)
|
|
|
(60)
|
|
|
(1,813)
|
|
|
(30,498)
|
Change in expected cash flows
|
|
2,134
|
|
|
13,722
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
(1,386)
|
|
|
14,456
|
Transfer from (to) non-accretable
discount
|
|
693
|
|
|
(4,624)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
(3,841)
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
45,839
|
|
$
|
16,475
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
64,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accretable Discount Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
12,869
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
8,287
|
|
$
|
21,156
|
Change in actual and expected cash
flows
|
|
(3,735)
|
|
|
(744)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
(8,292)
|
|
|
(12,657)
|
Transfer (to) from accretable yield
|
|
(693)
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
|
(28)
|
|
|
(75)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
3,841
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
8,441
|
|
$
|
3,880
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
$
|
12,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Non-accrual Loans
The following table presents
the recorded investment in loans in non-accrual status by class of loans as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Originated and other loans and leases
held for investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional (by origination year):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to the year 2002
|
$
|
2,538
|
|
$
|
3,070
|
Years 2003 and 2004
|
|
5,818
|
|
|
6,380
|
Year 2005
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
3,280
|
Year 2006
|
|
5,140
|
|
|
5,905
|
Years 2007, 2008 and 2009
|
|
6,697
|
|
|
7,984
|
Years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
|
|
8,427
|
|
|
6,259
|
Years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and
2018
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
33,682
|
|
|
34,527
|
Non-traditional
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
3,543
|
Loss mitigation program
|
|
22,107
|
|
|
16,783
|
|
|
58,874
|
|
|
54,853
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional
|
|
9,911
|
|
|
118
|
Middle market
|
|
7,266
|
|
|
11,394
|
Retail
|
|
16,123
|
|
|
14,438
|
|
|
33,300
|
|
|
25,950
|
Other commercial and industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle market
|
|
6,481
|
|
|
6,323
|
Retail
|
|
2,629
|
|
|
2,929
|
Floor plan
|
|
46
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
9,156
|
|
|
9,303
|
|
|
42,456
|
|
|
35,253
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
411
|
|
|
1,227
|
Overdrafts
|
|
-
|
|
|
31
|
Personal lines of credit
|
|
31
|
|
|
102
|
Personal loans
|
|
2,909
|
|
|
900
|
Cash collateral personal loans
|
|
3
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
2,572
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
13,494
|
|
|
4,232
|
Total non-accrual originated loans
|
$
|
118,178
|
|
$
|
96,910
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for
under ASC 310-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
$
|
54
|
|
$
|
119
|
Floor plan
|
|
888
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
1,047
|
Other commercial and industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
8
|
|
|
221
|
Floor plan
|
|
-
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
1,270
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
380
|
|
|
1,310
|
Personal loans
|
|
18
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
1,355
|
Auto
|
|
200
|
|
|
179
|
Total non-accrual acquired BBVAPR
loans accounted for under ASC 310-20
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
2,804
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
$
|
119,726
|
|
$
|
99,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are
excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to
the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete
interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow
analyses or are accounted under the cost recovery method.
Delinquent
residential mortgage loans insured or guaranteed under applicable FHA and VA
programs are classified as non-performing loans when they become 90 days or
more past due, but are not placed in non-accrual status until they become 12
months or more past due, since they are insured loans. Therefore, these loans
are included as non-performing loans but excluded from non-accrual loans. In addition, these loans are excluded from the impairment
analysis.
At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, loans whose terms have been extended and which are
classified as troubled-debt restructurings that are not included in non-accrual
loans amounted to $112.9 million and $109.2 million, respectively, as
they are performing under their new terms.
At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, loans that are current in their monthly payments,
but placed in non-accrual due to credit deterioration amounted to $21.2 million and $20.1 million, respectively.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Impaired Loans
Oriental evaluates all loans,
some individually and others as homogeneous groups, for purposes of determining
impairment. The total investment in impaired commercial loans that were
individually evaluated for impairment was $82.0 million and $72.3 million at December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively. The impairments on these
commercial loans were measured based on the fair value of collateral or the
present value of cash flows, including those identified as troubled-debt
restructurings. The allowance for loan and lease losses for these
impaired commercial loans amounted to $8.4 million and $10.6 million at December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively. The total investment in impaired mortgage loans
that were individually evaluated for impairment was $84.2 million and $85.4 million at December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively. Impairment on mortgage loans assessed as
troubled-debt restructurings was measured using the present value of cash
flows. The allowance for loan losses for these impaired mortgage loans amounted
to $10.2 million and $9.1 million at December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively.
Originated and Other Loans and Leases Held for
Investment
Oriental’s recorded
investment in commercial and mortgage loans categorized as originated and other
loans and leases held for investment that were individually evaluated for
impairment and the related allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31,
2018 and 2017 are as follows:
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Recorded
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Coverage
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Impaired loans with specific allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
54,636
|
|
$
|
49,092
|
|
$
|
8,434
|
|
17%
|
|
|
Residential impaired and
troubled-debt restructuring
|
|
95,659
|
|
|
84,174
|
|
|
10,186
|
|
12%
|
|
|
Impaired loans with no specific
allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
38,241
|
|
|
32,137
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
0%
|
|
|
Total investment in impaired
loans
|
$
|
188,536
|
|
$
|
165,403
|
|
$
|
18,620
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Recorded
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Coverage
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Impaired loans with specific allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
57,922
|
|
$
|
52,585
|
|
$
|
10,573
|
|
20%
|
|
|
Residential impaired and
troubled-debt restructuring
|
|
94,971
|
|
|
85,403
|
|
|
9,121
|
|
11%
|
|
|
Impaired loans with no specific
allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
22,022
|
|
|
18,953
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
0%
|
|
|
Total investment in impaired
loans
|
$
|
174,915
|
|
$
|
156,941
|
|
$
|
19,694
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Acquired BBVAPR Loans Accounted for under
ASC 310-20 (Loans with revolving feature and/or acquired at a premium)
Oriental’s recorded investment in acquired BBVAPR
commercial loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 that were individually
evaluated for impairment and the related allowance for loan and lease losses at
December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Recorded
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Coverage
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Impaired loans with specific allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
926
|
|
$
|
747
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
2%
|
Impaired loans with no specific
allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
0%
|
Total investment in impaired
loans
|
$
|
926
|
|
$
|
747
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Recorded
|
|
Specific
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Coverage
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Impaired loans with specific allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
926
|
|
$
|
747
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
3%
|
Impaired loans with no specific
allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
0%
|
Total investment in impaired
loans
|
$
|
926
|
|
$
|
747
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired BBVAPR Loans Accounted for under ASC 310-30
(including those accounted for under ASC 310-30 by analogy)
Oriental’s recorded
investment in acquired BBVAPR loan pools accounted for under ASC 310-30 that
have recorded impairments and their related allowance for loan and lease losses
at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
|
to Recorded
|
|
Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Investment
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Impaired loan pools with specific
allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
498,537
|
|
$
|
492,890
|
|
$
|
15,225
|
|
3%
|
Commercial
|
|
188,413
|
|
|
180,790
|
|
|
20,641
|
|
11%
|
Auto
|
|
14,551
|
|
|
14,403
|
|
|
6,144
|
|
43%
|
Total investment in impaired
loan pools
|
$
|
701,501
|
|
$
|
688,083
|
|
$
|
42,010
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31 ,
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
|
to Recorded
|
|
Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Investment
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Impaired loan pools with specific
allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
547,064
|
|
$
|
532,052
|
|
$
|
14,085
|
|
3%
|
Commercial
|
|
250,451
|
|
|
241,124
|
|
|
23,691
|
|
10%
|
Consumer
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
18
|
|
1%
|
Auto
|
|
43,440
|
|
|
43,696
|
|
|
7,961
|
|
18%
|
Total investment in impaired
loan pools
|
$
|
843,423
|
|
$
|
818,303
|
|
$
|
45,755
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
tables above only present information with respect to acquired BBVAPR loan
pools accounted for under ASC 310-30 if there is a recorded impairment to such
loan pools and a specific allowance for loan losses.
Acquired Eurobank Loans
Oriental’s recorded
investment in acquired Eurobank loan pools that have recorded impairments and
their related allowance for loan and lease losses as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
|
to Recorded
|
|
Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Investment
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Impaired loan pools with specific
allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans secured by 1-4 family
residential properties
|
$
|
70,153
|
|
$
|
63,406
|
|
$
|
15,382
|
|
24%
|
Commercial
|
|
47,342
|
|
|
47,820
|
|
|
9,585
|
|
20%
|
Consumer
|
|
15
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
100%
|
Total investment in impaired
loan pools
|
$
|
117,510
|
|
$
|
111,230
|
|
$
|
24,971
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
Recorded
|
|
Specific
|
|
to Recorded
|
|
Principal
|
|
Investment
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Investment
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Impaired loan pools with specific
allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans secured by 1-4 family
residential properties
|
$
|
81,132
|
|
$
|
69,538
|
|
$
|
15,187
|
|
22%
|
Commercial
|
|
58,099
|
|
|
53,793
|
|
|
9,983
|
|
19%
|
Consumer
|
|
15
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
100%
|
Total investment in impaired
loan pools
|
$
|
139,246
|
|
$
|
123,335
|
|
$
|
25,174
|
|
20%
|
The
tables above only present information with respect to acquired Eurobank loan
pools accounted for under ASC 310-30 if there is a recorded impairment to such
loan pools and a specific allowance for loan losses.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The
following table presents the interest recognized in commercial and mortgage
loans that were individually evaluated for impairment, which excludes loans
accounted for under ASC 310-30, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016:
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Interest
Income Recognized
|
|
Average
Recorded Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income Recognized
|
|
Average
Recorded Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income Recognized
|
Average
Recorded Investment
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Originated and other loans held for
investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with specific allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
1,624
|
|
$
|
44,727
|
|
$
|
1,538
|
|
$
|
25,797
|
|
$
|
452
|
|
$
|
118,980
|
Residential troubled-debt
restructuring
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
84,494
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
87,414
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
91,139
|
Impaired loans with no specific
allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
26,199
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
36,666
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
40,443
|
Total interest income from
impaired loans
|
$
|
5,271
|
|
$
|
155,420
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
$
|
149,877
|
|
$
|
5,583
|
|
$
|
250,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired loans accounted for under ASC
310-20:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with specific allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
747
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
794
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
319
|
Impaired loans with no specific
allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
608
|
Total interest income from
impaired loans
|
$
|
5,271
|
|
$
|
156,167
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
$
|
150,671
|
|
$
|
5,583
|
|
$
|
251,489
|
Modifications
The following tables present
the troubled-debt restructurings in all loan portfolios during the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
Number of
contracts
|
|
Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
|
Pre-Modification
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
Pre-Modification
Weighted Average Term (in Months)
|
|
Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
|
Post-Modification
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
Post-Modification
Weighted Average Term (in Months)
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Mortgage
|
143
|
|
$
|
19,029
|
|
5.09%
|
|
342
|
|
$
|
18,237
|
|
4.41%
|
|
314
|
Commercial
|
23
|
|
|
26,019
|
|
5.75%
|
|
118
|
|
|
25,973
|
|
5.64%
|
|
136
|
Consumer
|
174
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
13.24%
|
|
51
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
9.86%
|
|
61
|
Auto
|
2
|
|
|
40
|
|
10.42%
|
|
37
|
|
|
40
|
|
10.28%
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Number of
contracts
|
|
Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
|
Pre-Modification
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
Pre-Modification
Weighted Average Term (in Months)
|
|
Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
|
Post-Modification
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
Post-Modification
Weighted Average Term (in Months)
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Mortgage
|
85
|
|
$
|
10,441
|
|
6.23%
|
|
390
|
|
$
|
10,343
|
|
4.40%
|
|
384
|
Commercial
|
24
|
|
|
13,828
|
|
6.05%
|
|
57
|
|
|
13,829
|
|
5.73%
|
|
62
|
Consumer
|
107
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
11.68%
|
|
62
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
10.85%
|
|
69
|
Auto
|
9
|
|
|
134
|
|
7.24%
|
|
66
|
|
|
135
|
|
11.75%
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Number of
contracts
|
|
Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
|
Pre-Modification
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
Pre-Modification
Weighted Average Term (in Months)
|
|
Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
|
Post-Modification
Weighted Average Rate
|
|
Post-Modification
Weighted Average Term (in Months)
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Mortgage
|
90
|
|
$
|
11,684
|
|
6.05%
|
|
351
|
|
$
|
11,625
|
|
4.77%
|
|
439
|
Commercial
|
20
|
|
|
9,833
|
|
5.73%
|
|
64
|
|
|
10,151
|
|
5.93%
|
|
116
|
Consumer
|
75
|
|
|
817
|
|
13.60%
|
|
73
|
|
|
902
|
|
11.23%
|
|
66
|
The following table presents troubled-debt
restructurings for which there was a payment default during the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Number of
Contracts
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Number of
Contracts
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
Number of
Contracts
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Mortgage
|
23
|
|
$
|
3,262
|
|
|
34
|
|
$
|
3,129
|
|
19
|
|
$
|
2,241
|
Commercial
|
4
|
|
$
|
2,141
|
|
|
5
|
|
$
|
452
|
|
2
|
|
$
|
157
|
Consumer
|
28
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
20
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
11
|
|
$
|
126
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Credit Quality Indicators
Oriental categorizes
originated and other loans and acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-20
into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of
borrowers to service their debt, such as economic conditions, portfolio risk
characteristics, prior loss experience, and the results of periodic credit
reviews of individual loans.
Oriental uses the following
definitions for risk ratings:
Pass: Loans classified as “pass”
have a well-defined primary source of repayment very likely to be sufficient,
with no apparent risk, strong financial position, minimal operating risk,
profitability, liquidity and capitalization better than industry standards.
Special
Mention: Loans
classified as “special mention” have a potential weakness that deserves
management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses
may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the
institution’s credit position at some future date.
Substandard: Loans classified as
“substandard” are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying
capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so
classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the
liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility
that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not
corrected.
Doubtful: Loans classified as
“doubtful” have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard,
with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and
values, questionable and improbable.
Loss: Loans classified as “loss”
are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as
bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the
asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not
practical or desirable to defer writing off this worthless loan even though
partial recovery may be effected in the future.
Loans not meeting the
criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described
process are considered to be pass rated loans.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and based on the
most recent analysis performed, the risk category of gross originated and other
loans and BBVAPR acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 subject to risk
rating by class of loans is as follows:
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
Risk Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Pass
|
|
Mention
|
|
Substandard
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
Loss
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Commercial - originated and other loans
held for investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
$
|
289,052
|
|
$
|
246,711
|
|
$
|
26,544
|
|
$
|
15,797
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Institutional
|
|
69,613
|
|
|
59,509
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Middle market
|
|
207,463
|
|
|
151,638
|
|
|
32,638
|
|
|
23,187
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Retail
|
|
224,114
|
|
|
198,402
|
|
|
3,996
|
|
|
21,716
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
2,890
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Real estate
|
|
19,009
|
|
|
19,009
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
813,435
|
|
|
678,159
|
|
|
63,178
|
|
|
72,098
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Other commercial and industrial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
179,885
|
|
|
154,629
|
|
|
25,256
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Institutional
|
|
156,410
|
|
|
156,410
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Middle market
|
|
87,967
|
|
|
63,876
|
|
|
13,737
|
|
|
10,354
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Retail
|
|
310,212
|
|
|
307,160
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
49,679
|
|
|
47,092
|
|
|
2,541
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
784,153
|
|
|
729,167
|
|
|
41,852
|
|
|
13,134
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
1,597,588
|
|
|
1,407,326
|
|
|
105,030
|
|
|
85,232
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial - acquired loans
(under ASC 310-20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
54
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
982
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Other commercial and industrial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
Risk Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Pass
|
|
Mention
|
|
Substandard
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
Loss
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Retail - originated and other loans held
for investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional
|
|
527,732
|
|
|
493,952
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
33,780
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Non-traditional
|
|
14,273
|
|
|
11,188
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Loss mitigation program
|
|
106,833
|
|
|
87,444
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
19,389
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Home equity secured personal loans
|
|
250
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
GNMA's buy-back option program
|
|
19,721
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
19,721
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
668,809
|
|
|
592,834
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
75,975
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
28,034
|
|
|
27,623
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Overdrafts
|
|
214
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Unsecured personal lines of credit
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Unsecured personal loans
|
|
303,119
|
|
|
301,857
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Cash collateral personal loans
|
|
15,696
|
|
|
15,693
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
348,980
|
|
|
347,272
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Auto and Leasing
|
|
1,129,695
|
|
|
1,116,201
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
13,494
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
2,147,484
|
|
|
2,056,307
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
91,177
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail - acquired loans (accounted for
under ASC 310-20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
21,822
|
|
|
21,442
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Personal loans
|
|
2,166
|
|
|
2,148
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
23,988
|
|
|
23,590
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Auto
|
|
4,435
|
|
|
4,235
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
28,423
|
|
|
27,825
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
3,776,041
|
|
$
|
3,493,062
|
|
$
|
105,030
|
|
$
|
177,949
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Risk Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Pass
|
|
Mention
|
|
Substandard
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
Loss
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Commercial - originated and other loans
held for investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
$
|
235,426
|
|
$
|
200,395
|
|
$
|
33,094
|
|
$
|
1,937
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
Institutional
|
|
44,766
|
|
|
33,856
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10,910
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Middle market
|
|
229,941
|
|
|
196,058
|
|
|
4,749
|
|
|
29,134
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Retail
|
|
246,067
|
|
|
215,121
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
22,888
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
3,998
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Real estate
|
|
17,556
|
|
|
17,556
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
777,754
|
|
|
665,664
|
|
|
47,221
|
|
|
64,869
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Other commercial and industrial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
170,015
|
|
|
157,683
|
|
|
12,332
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Institutional
|
|
125,591
|
|
|
125,591
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Middle market
|
|
85,363
|
|
|
71,222
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
|
7,755
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Retail
|
|
113,252
|
|
|
109,477
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
35,286
|
|
|
32,165
|
|
|
3,070
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
529,507
|
|
|
496,138
|
|
|
22,350
|
|
|
11,019
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
1,307,261
|
|
|
1,161,802
|
|
|
69,571
|
|
|
75,888
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial - acquired loans
(under ASC 310-20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
119
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Other commercial and industrial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
2,938
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Floor plan
|
|
2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
4,380
|
|
|
3,326
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Risk Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Pass
|
|
Mention
|
|
Substandard
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
Loss
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Retail - originated and other loans held
for investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional
|
|
553,533
|
|
|
516,770
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
36,763
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Non-traditional
|
|
18,270
|
|
|
14,727
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,543
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Loss mitigation program
|
|
103,280
|
|
|
84,357
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
18,923
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Home equity secured personal loans
|
|
256
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
GNMA's buy-back option program
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
683,607
|
|
|
616,110
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
67,497
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
28,430
|
|
|
27,203
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Overdrafts
|
|
214
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Unsecured personal lines of credit
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Unsecured personal loans
|
|
284,477
|
|
|
284,255
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Cash collateral personal loans
|
|
14,698
|
|
|
14,386
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
330,039
|
|
|
328,135
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Auto and Leasing
|
|
883,985
|
|
|
879,753
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
1,897,631
|
|
|
1,823,998
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
73,633
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail - acquired loans
(under ASC 310-20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
26,467
|
|
|
25,156
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Personal loans
|
|
2,448
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
28,915
|
|
|
27,558
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Auto
|
|
21,969
|
|
|
21,790
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
50,884
|
|
|
49,348
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
3,260,156
|
|
$
|
3,038,474
|
|
$
|
69,571
|
|
$
|
152,111
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 7 – ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
The composition of Oriental’s allowance for loan and
lease losses at December 31, 2018 and
2017 was
as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loans and lease losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated and other loans and
leases held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
$
|
19,783
|
|
$
|
20,439
|
Commercial
|
|
30,326
|
|
|
30,258
|
Consumer
|
|
15,571
|
|
|
16,454
|
Auto and leasing
|
|
29,508
|
|
|
25,567
|
Total allowance for originated and
other loans and lease losses
|
|
95,188
|
|
|
92,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired BBVAPR loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounted for under ASC 310-20
(Loans with revolving feature and/or
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquired at a premium)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
22
|
|
|
42
|
Consumer
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
3,225
|
Auto
|
|
135
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
|
3,862
|
Accounted for under ASC 310-30
(Loans acquired with deteriorated
|
|
|
|
|
|
credit quality, including those
by analogy)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
15,225
|
|
|
14,085
|
Commercial
|
|
20,641
|
|
|
23,691
|
Consumer
|
|
-
|
|
|
18
|
Auto
|
|
6,144
|
|
|
7,961
|
|
|
42,010
|
|
|
45,755
|
Total allowance for acquired
BBVAPR loans and lease losses
|
|
44,072
|
|
|
49,617
|
Acquired Eurobank loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans secured by 1-4 family
residential properties
|
|
15,382
|
|
|
15,187
|
Commercial
|
|
9,585
|
|
|
9,983
|
Consumer
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
Total allowance for acquired
Eurobank loan and lease losses
|
|
24,971
|
|
|
25,174
|
Total allowance for loan and lease
losses
|
$
|
164,231
|
|
$
|
167,509
|
Oriental maintains an allowance for loan
and lease losses at a level that management considers adequate to provide for
probable losses based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks.
Oriental’s allowance for loan and lease losses policy provides for a detailed
quarterly analysis of probable losses. The analysis includes a review of historical
loan loss experience, value of underlying collateral, current economic
conditions, financial condition of borrowers and other pertinent factors. While
management uses available information in estimating probable loan losses,
future additions to the allowance may be required based on factors beyond
Oriental’s control. We also maintain an allowance for loan losses on acquired
loans when: (i) for loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, there is
deterioration in credit quality subsequent to acquisition, and (ii) for loans
accounted for under ASC 310-20, the inherent losses in the loans exceed the
remaining credit discount recorded at the time of acquisition.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
As discussed in Note 2, during 2017, hurricanes Irma and Maria caused
catastrophic damages throughout Puerto Rico. Management performed an evaluation
of the loan portfolios to assess the impact on repayment sources and underlying
collateral that could result in additional losses.
For the commercial
portfolio, the framework for the analysis was based on our current ALLL
methodology with additional considerations according to the estimated impact
categorized as low, medium or high. From this impact assessment, additional
reserve levels were estimated by increasing default probabilities (“PD”) and
loss given default expectations (“LGD”) of each allowance segment.
As part of the
process, Oriental contacted its clients to evaluate the impact of the
hurricanes on their business operations and collateral. The impact was then
categorized as follows: (i) low risk, for clients that had no business impact
or relatively insignificant impact; (ii) medium risk, for clients that had a
business impact on their primary or secondary sources of repayment, but still
had adequate cash flow to cover operations and to satisfy their obligations; or
(iii) high risk, for clients that had potentially significant problems that
affected primary, secondary and tertiary (collateral) sources of repayment.
This criterion was used to model adjusted PDs and LGDs considering internal and
external sources of information available to support our estimation process and
output.
During the fourth
quarter of 2017, Oriental performed an update of the initial estimate, taking
into consideration the most recent available information gathered through
additional visits and interviews with clients and the economic environment in
Puerto Rico.
For the retail
portfolios, mortgage, consumer and auto, the assumptions established in the
initial estimate were based on the historical losses of each ALLL segment and
then further adjusted based on parameters used as key risk indicators, such as
the industry of employment for all portfolios and the location of the
collateral for mortgage loans. During the fourth quarter of 2017, Oriental
performed additional procedures to evaluate the reasonability of the initial
estimate based on the payment experience percentage of borrowers for which the
deferral period expired. The analysis took into consideration historical
payment behavior and loss experience of borrowers (PDs and LGDs) of each
portfolio segment to develop a range of estimated potential losses. Management
understands that this approach is reasonable given the lack of historical
information related to the behavior of local borrowers in such an unprecedented
event. The amount used in the analysis represents the average of potential
outcomes of expected losses.
During 2018,
Oriental continued its monitoring process of the performance of those affected
borrowers. As information became available, it was incorporated into the
allowance framework.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Oriental's allowance for loan and
lease losses incorporated all risks associated to our loan portfolio, including
the impact of hurricanes Irma and Maria.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Allowance
for Originated and Other Loan and Lease Losses Held for Investment
The
following tables present the activity in our allowance for loan and lease
losses and the related recorded investment of the originated and other loans
held for investment portfolio by segment for the periods indicated:
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto and
Leasing
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses for
originated and other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
20,439
|
|
$
|
30,258
|
|
$
|
16,454
|
|
$
|
25,567
|
|
$
|
92,718
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(5,297)
|
|
|
(6,782)
|
|
|
(17,629)
|
|
|
(42,685)
|
|
|
(72,393)
|
Recoveries
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
19,344
|
|
|
22,802
|
Provision for loan and lease
losses
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
6,196
|
|
|
14,989
|
|
|
27,282
|
|
|
52,061
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
19,783
|
|
$
|
30,326
|
|
$
|
15,571
|
|
$
|
29,508
|
|
$
|
95,188
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto and
Leasing
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses for
originated and other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
17,344
|
|
$
|
8,995
|
|
$
|
13,067
|
|
$
|
19,463
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
$
|
59,300
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(6,623)
|
|
|
(7,684)
|
|
|
(13,641)
|
|
|
(33,908)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(61,856)
|
Recoveries
|
|
585
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
12,314
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
15,389
|
Provision (recapture) for
originated and other loan and lease losses
|
|
9,133
|
|
|
27,666
|
|
|
15,819
|
|
|
27,698
|
|
|
(431)
|
|
|
79,885
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
20,439
|
|
$
|
30,258
|
|
$
|
16,454
|
|
$
|
25,567
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
92,718
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto and
Leasing
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses for
originated and other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
18,352
|
|
$
|
64,791
|
|
$
|
11,197
|
|
$
|
18,261
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
$
|
112,626
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(6,767)
|
|
|
(62,445)
|
|
|
(11,554)
|
|
|
(31,731)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(112,497)
|
Recoveries
|
|
330
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
12,871
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
14,113
|
Provision for originated and
other loan and lease losses
|
|
5,429
|
|
|
6,189
|
|
|
12,972
|
|
|
20,062
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
45,058
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
17,344
|
|
$
|
8,995
|
|
$
|
13,067
|
|
$
|
19,463
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
$
|
59,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto and
Leasing
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses on
originated and other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance balance
attributable
to loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment
|
$
|
10,186
|
|
$
|
8,434
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
18,620
|
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
|
|
9,597
|
|
|
21,892
|
|
|
15,571
|
|
|
29,508
|
|
|
76,568
|
Total ending allowance
balance
|
$
|
19,783
|
|
$
|
30,326
|
|
$
|
15,571
|
|
$
|
29,508
|
|
$
|
95,188
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment
|
$
|
84,174
|
|
$
|
81,229
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
165,403
|
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
|
|
584,635
|
|
|
1,516,359
|
|
|
348,980
|
|
|
1,129,695
|
|
|
3,579,669
|
Total ending loan
balance
|
$
|
668,809
|
|
$
|
1,597,588
|
|
$
|
348,980
|
|
$
|
1,129,695
|
|
$
|
3,745,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto and
Leasing
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses on
originated and other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance balance
attributable
to loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment
|
$
|
9,121
|
|
$
|
10,573
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
19,694
|
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
|
|
11,318
|
|
|
19,685
|
|
|
16,454
|
|
|
25,567
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
73,024
|
Total ending allowance
balance
|
$
|
20,439
|
|
$
|
30,258
|
|
$
|
16,454
|
|
$
|
25,567
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
92,718
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment
|
$
|
85,403
|
|
$
|
71,538
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
156,941
|
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
|
|
598,204
|
|
|
1,235,723
|
|
|
330,039
|
|
|
883,985
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,047,951
|
Total ending loan
balance
|
$
|
683,607
|
|
$
|
1,307,261
|
|
$
|
330,039
|
|
$
|
883,985
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
3,204,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for BBVAPR
Acquired Loan Losses
Loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 (Loans with revolving feature
and/or acquired at a premium)
The
following tables present the activity in our allowance for loan losses and
related recorded investment of the associated loans in our BBVAPR acquired loan
portfolio accounted for under ASC 310-20, for the periods indicated:
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
for acquired BBVAPR loans
accounted for under ASC 310-20:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
42
|
|
$
|
3,225
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
$
|
3,862
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
(2,459)
|
|
|
(372)
|
|
|
(2,837)
|
Recoveries
|
|
23
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
1,334
|
Provision (recapture) for
acquired BBVAPR
loan and lease losses
accounted for
under ASC 310-20
|
|
(37)
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
(919)
|
|
|
(297)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
22
|
|
$
|
1,905
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
$
|
2,062
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
for acquired BBVAPR loans
accounted for under ASC 310-20:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
169
|
|
$
|
3,028
|
|
$
|
1,103
|
|
$
|
4,300
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(132)
|
|
|
(3,048)
|
|
|
(976)
|
|
|
(4,156)
|
Recoveries
|
|
5
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
1,871
|
Provision (recapture) for
acquired
loan and lease losses
accounted for
under ASC 310-20
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
(952)
|
|
|
1,847
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
42
|
|
$
|
3,225
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
$
|
3,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
for acquired BBVAPR loans
accounted for under ASC 310-20:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
26
|
|
$
|
3,429
|
|
$
|
2,087
|
|
$
|
5,542
|
Charge-offs
|
|
(42)
|
|
|
(3,619)
|
|
|
(2,155)
|
|
|
(5,816)
|
Recoveries
|
|
73
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
2,319
|
Provision (recapture) for
acquired
loan and lease losses
accounted for
under ASC 310-20
|
|
112
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
(774)
|
|
|
2,255
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
169
|
|
$
|
3,028
|
|
$
|
1,103
|
|
$
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
for acquired BBVAPR loans
accounted for under ASC 310-20:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance balance
attributable
to loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment
|
$
|
14
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
14
|
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
|
|
8
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
2,048
|
Total ending allowance
balance
|
$
|
22
|
|
$
|
1,905
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
$
|
2,062
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment
|
$
|
747
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
747
|
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
23,988
|
|
|
4,435
|
|
|
30,222
|
Total ending loan
balance
|
$
|
2,546
|
|
$
|
23,988
|
|
$
|
4,435
|
|
$
|
30,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
for acquired BBVAPR loans
accounted for under ASC 310-20:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance balance
attributable
to loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment
|
$
|
20
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
20
|
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
|
|
22
|
|
|
3,225
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
3,842
|
Total ending allowance
balance
|
$
|
42
|
|
$
|
3,225
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
$
|
3,862
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment
|
$
|
747
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
747
|
Collectively evaluated for
impairment
|
|
3,633
|
|
|
28,915
|
|
|
21,969
|
|
|
54,517
|
Total ending loan
balance
|
$
|
4,380
|
|
$
|
28,915
|
|
$
|
21,969
|
|
$
|
55,264
|
Loans Accounted for under ASC 310-30 (including those accounted for
under ASC 310-30 by analogy)
For loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, as part of
the evaluation of actual versus expected cash flows, Oriental assesses on a
quarterly basis the credit quality of these loans based on delinquency,
severity factors and risk ratings, among other assumptions. Migration and
credit quality trends are assessed at the pool level, by comparing information
from the latest evaluation period through the end of the reporting period.
The following tables present the activity in our
allowance for loan losses and related recorded investment of the acquired
BBVAPR loan portfolio accounted for under ASC 310-30 for the periods indicated:
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses for
acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for
under
ASC 310-30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
14,085
|
|
$
|
23,691
|
|
$
|
18
|
$
|
7,961
|
|
45,755
|
Provision (recapture) for acquired
BBVAPR
loans and lease losses accounted for
under
ASC 310-30
|
|
1,331
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
(887)
|
|
1,786
|
Allowance de-recognition
|
|
(191)
|
|
|
(4,410)
|
|
|
-
|
|
(930)
|
|
(5,531)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
15,225
|
|
$
|
20,641
|
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,144
|
|
42,010
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses for
acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for
under
ASC 310-30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
2,682
|
|
$
|
23,452
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
4,922
|
|
$
|
31,056
|
Provision for acquired BBVAPR loans and
lease losses accounted for under ASC
310-30
|
|
11,497
|
|
|
9,758
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
3,408
|
|
|
24,681
|
Allowance de-recognition
|
|
(94)
|
|
|
(9,519)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(369)
|
|
|
(9,982)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
14,085
|
|
$
|
23,691
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
$
|
7,961
|
|
$
|
45,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Auto
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses for
acquired BBVAPR loans accounted for under
ASC 310-30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
1,762
|
|
$
|
21,161
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
2,862
|
|
$
|
25,785
|
Provision for acquired BBVAPR loans and
ease losses accounted for under ASC
310-30
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
11,710
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,693
|
|
|
15,508
|
Loan pools fully charged-off
|
|
(14)
|
|
|
(66)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(202)
|
|
|
(282)
|
Allowance de-recognition
|
|
(171)
|
|
|
(9,353)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(431)
|
|
|
(9,955)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
2,682
|
|
$
|
23,452
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
4,922
|
|
$
|
31,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Allowance for Acquired Eurobank Loan Losses
The changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses
on acquired Eurobank loans for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
were as follows:
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
Loans Secured
by 1-4 Family Residential Properties
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses for
acquired Eurobank loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
15,187
|
|
$
|
9,983
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
25,174
|
Provision for loan and lease
losses, net
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,567
|
Allowance de-recognition
|
|
(1,611)
|
|
|
(1,159)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(2,770)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
15,382
|
|
$
|
9,585
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
24,971
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Loans secured
by 1-4 Family Residential Properties
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses for
acquired Eurobank loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
11,947
|
|
$
|
9,328
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
21,281
|
Provision for acquired
Eurobank loan and lease losses, net
|
|
5,045
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
6,725
|
Allowance de-recognition
|
|
(1,805)
|
|
|
(1,025)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(2,832)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
15,187
|
|
$
|
9,983
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
25,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Loans secured
by 1-4 Family Residential Properties
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses for
Eurobank loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
22,570
|
|
$
|
67,365
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
$
|
90,178
|
Provision (recapture) for
acquired Eurobank loan and lease losses, net
|
|
1,080
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
2,255
|
FDIC shared-loss portion of
provision for covered loan and lease losses, net
|
|
3,391
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,391
|
Loan pools fully charged-off
|
|
-
|
|
|
(134)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(134)
|
Allowance de-recognition
|
|
(15,094)
|
|
|
(59,086)
|
|
|
(229)
|
|
|
(74,409)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
11,947
|
|
$
|
9,328
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
21,281
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 8- FDIC SHARED-LOSS AGREEMENTS
On February 6,
2017, the Bank and the FDIC agreed to terminate the single family and
commercial shared-loss agreements related to the FDIC assisted acquisition of
Eurobank on April 30, 2010. As part of the loss share termination
transaction, the Bank made a payment of $10.1 million to the FDIC and recorded
a net benefit of $1.4 million. Such termination payment took into account the
anticipated reimbursements over the life of the shared-loss agreements and the
true-up payment liability of the Bank anticipated at the end of the ten-year
term of the single family shared-loss agreement. All rights and
obligations of the parties under the shared-loss agreements terminated as of
the closing date of the agreement.
The following table
presents the activity in the FDIC indemnification asset and true-up payment
obligation for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
FDIC indemnification asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
14,411
|
|
$
|
22,599
|
Shared-loss agreements
reimbursements from the FDIC
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,573)
|
Increase in expected credit losses
to be
covered under shared-loss
agreements, net
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,391
|
FDIC indemnification asset benefit
(expense)
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
(8,040)
|
Net expenses incurred under
shared-loss agreements
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,966)
|
Shared-loss termination settlement
|
|
-
|
|
|
(15,814)
|
|
|
-
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
14,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True-up payment obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
26,786
|
|
$
|
24,658
|
Change in true-up payment obligation
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,128
|
Shared-loss termination settlement
|
|
-
|
|
|
(26,786)
|
|
|
-
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
26,786
|
Oriental recognized an FDIC shared-loss
(benefit) expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations, which
consists of the following, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
FDIC indemnification asset (benefit)
expense
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
(1,403)
|
|
$
|
8,040
|
Change in true-up payment obligation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,128
|
Reimbursement to FDIC for recoveries
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,413
|
Total FDIC shared-loss (benefit)
expense, net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
(1,403)
|
|
$
|
13,581
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 9 — FORECLOSED
REAL ESTATE
The
following tables present the activity related to foreclosed real estate for the
years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016:
|
Year Ended December
31, 2018
|
|
Originated
and other loans and leases held for investment
|
|
Acquired
BBVAPR loans
|
|
Acquired
Eurobank loans
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
14,283
|
|
$
|
18,347
|
|
$
|
11,544
|
|
$
|
44,174
|
Decline in value
|
|
(1,535)
|
|
|
(2,899)
|
|
|
(1,323)
|
|
|
(5,757)
|
Additions
|
|
6,674
|
|
|
9,832
|
|
|
3,505
|
|
|
20,011
|
Sales
|
|
(9,851)
|
|
|
(10,663)
|
|
|
(4,146)
|
|
|
(24,660)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
9,571
|
|
$
|
14,617
|
|
$
|
9,580
|
|
$
|
33,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Originated
and other loans and leases held for investment
|
|
Acquired
BBVAPR loans
|
|
Acquired
Eurobank loans
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
12,390
|
|
$
|
21,379
|
|
$
|
13,751
|
|
$
|
47,520
|
Decline in value
|
|
(1,913)
|
|
|
(2,850)
|
|
|
(1,797)
|
|
|
(6,560)
|
Additions
|
|
10,565
|
|
|
9,416
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
23,101
|
Sales
|
|
(6,615)
|
|
|
(9,453)
|
|
|
(3,530)
|
|
|
(19,598)
|
Other adjustments
|
|
(144)
|
|
|
(145)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(289)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
14,283
|
|
$
|
18,347
|
|
$
|
11,544
|
|
$
|
44,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Originated
and other loans and leases held for investment
|
|
Acquired
BBVAPR loans
|
|
Acquired
Eurobank loans
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
10,324
|
|
$
|
26,757
|
|
$
|
21,095
|
|
$
|
58,176
|
Decline in value
|
|
(1,966)
|
|
|
(6,124)
|
|
|
(4,913)
|
|
|
(13,003)
|
Additions
|
|
10,170
|
|
|
7,872
|
|
|
3,591
|
|
|
21,633
|
Sales
|
|
(6,138)
|
|
|
(7,126)
|
|
|
(6,022)
|
|
|
(19,286)
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
12,390
|
|
$
|
21,379
|
|
$
|
13,751
|
|
$
|
47,520
|
NOTE
10 — PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises
and equipment at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization as follows:
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(Years)
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Land
|
—
|
|
$
|
5,028
|
|
$
|
5,638
|
Buildings
and improvements
|
40
|
|
|
67,856
|
|
|
64,277
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
5 — 10
|
|
|
18,274
|
|
|
20,647
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
3 — 7
|
|
|
17,137
|
|
|
16,242
|
Information
technology and other
|
3 — 7
|
|
|
24,855
|
|
|
28,783
|
|
|
|
|
133,150
|
|
|
135,587
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
(64,258)
|
|
|
(67,727)
|
|
|
|
$
|
68,892
|
|
$
|
67,860
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises
and equipment totaled $8.9 million in 2018, $9.0 million in 2017 and $9.4 million in 2016. These are
included in the consolidated statements of operations as part of occupancy and
equipment expenses.
NOTE
11 - SERVICING ASSETS
Oriental periodically sells
or securitizes mortgage loans while retaining the obligation to perform the
servicing of such loans. In addition, Oriental may purchase or assume the right
to service mortgage loans originated by others. Whenever Oriental undertakes an
obligation to service a loan, management assesses whether a servicing asset
and/or liability should be recognized. A servicing asset is recognized whenever
the compensation for servicing is expected to more than adequately compensate Oriental
for servicing the loans and leases. Likewise, a servicing liability would be
recognized in the event that servicing fees to be received are not expected to
adequately compensate Oriental for its expected cost.
All separately recognized
servicing assets are recognized at fair value using the fair value measurement
method. Under the fair value measurement method, Oriental measures servicing
rights at fair value at each reporting date, reports changes in fair value of
servicing assets in earnings in the period in which the changes occur, and
includes these changes, if any, with mortgage banking activities in the
consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of servicing rights is
subject to fluctuations as a result of changes in estimated and actual
prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.
The fair value of servicing
rights is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the
present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into
consideration actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates,
servicing costs, and other economic factors, which are determined based on
current market conditions.
At December 31, 2018, the servicing
asset amounted to $10.7 million ($9.8 million — December 31, 2017) related to
mortgage servicing rights.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The following table presents the changes in servicing
rights measured using the fair value method for years ended December 31, 2018,
2017, and 2016:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Fair value at beginning of year
|
$
|
9,821
|
|
$
|
9,858
|
|
$
|
7,455
|
|
Servicing from mortgage
securitizations or asset transfers
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
Changes due to payments on loans
|
|
(814)
|
|
|
(590)
|
|
|
(489)
|
|
Changes in fair value due to changes
in valuation model inputs or assumptions
|
|
228
|
|
|
(1,105)
|
|
|
276
|
|
Fair value at end of year
|
$
|
10,716
|
|
$
|
9,821
|
|
$
|
9,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table presents key economic assumption ranges used in measuring the
mortgage-related servicing asset fair value for the years ended 2018, 2017 and
2016:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Constant
prepayment rate
|
4.30% - 9.02%
|
|
3.94% - 8.49%
|
|
4.24% - 9.14%
|
Discount
rate
|
10.00% - 12.00%
|
|
10.00% - 12.00%
|
|
10.00% - 12.00%
|
The
sensitivity of the current fair value of servicing assets to immediate 10
percent and 20 percent adverse changes in the above key assumptions were as
follows:
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Mortgage-related
servicing asset
|
|
|
Carrying
value of mortgage servicing asset
|
$
|
10,716
|
Constant
prepayment rate
|
|
|
Decrease
in fair value due to 10% adverse change
|
$
|
(207)
|
Decrease
in fair value due to 20% adverse change
|
$
|
(406)
|
Discount
rate
|
|
|
Decrease
in fair value due to 10% adverse change
|
$
|
(489)
|
Decrease
in fair value due to 20% adverse change
|
$
|
(939)
|
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be
used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10
percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the
relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be
linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without
changing any other assumption.
Changes in one factor may
result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates
may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or offset the
sensitivities. Mortgage banking activities, a component of total banking and
financial service revenue in the consolidated statements of operations, include
the changes from period to period in the fair value of the mortgage loan
servicing rights, which may result from changes in the valuation model inputs
or assumptions (principally reflecting changes in discount rates and prepayment
speed assumptions) and other changes, including changes due to
collection/realization of expected cash flows.
Servicing
fee income is based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal
balance and is recorded as income when earned. Servicing fees on mortgage loans
for the years ended 2018, 2017 and 2016 totaled $4.1 million, $3.9 million and $3.7 million, respectively.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 12 —
DERIVATIVES
The following table presents Oriental’s derivative
assets and liabilities at December
31, 2018 and 2017:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Derivative assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps designated as
cash flow hedges
|
$
|
14
|
|
$
|
-
|
Interest rate swaps not designated
as hedges
|
|
126
|
|
|
618
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
207
|
|
|
153
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
$
|
771
|
Derivative liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps designated as
cash flow hedges
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
510
|
Interest rate swaps not designated
as hedges
|
|
126
|
|
|
618
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
207
|
|
|
153
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
Interest
Rate Swaps
Oriental
enters into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the variability of future
interest cash flows of forecasted wholesale borrowings attributable to changes
in a predetermined variable index rate. The interest rate swaps effectively fix
Oriental’s interest payments on an amount of forecasted interest expense
attributable to the variable index rate corresponding to the swap notional
stated rate. These swaps are designated as cash flow hedges for the forecasted
wholesale borrowing transactions and are properly documented as such;
therefore, qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. Any gain or loss associated
with the effective portion of the cash flow hedges is recognized in other
comprehensive (loss) and is subsequently reclassified into operations in the
period during which the hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. Changes
in the fair value of these derivatives are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income to the extent there is no significant ineffectiveness in
the cash flow hedging relationships. Currently, Oriental does not expect to
reclassify any amount included in other comprehensive (loss) related to these
interest rate swaps to operations in the next twelve months.
The following table shows a summary of these swaps and
their terms at December 31, 2018:
|
|
Notional
|
|
Fixed
|
|
Variable
|
|
Trade
|
|
Settlement
|
|
Maturity
|
Type
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate Index
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
$
|
33,964
|
|
2.4210%
|
|
1-Month LIBOR
|
|
07/03/13
|
|
07/03/13
|
|
08/01/23
|
|
|
$
|
33,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An
accumulated unrealized gain of $14 thousand and a loss of $510
thousand were
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the valuation
of these swaps at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and the related
asset or liability is being reflected in the consolidated statements of
financial condition.
At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, interest rate swaps not designated as hedging
instruments that were offered to clients represented an asset of $126 thousand
and $618 thousand, respectively, and were included as part of derivative assets
in the consolidated statements of financial position. The credit risk to these
clients stemming from these derivatives, if any, is not material. At December
31, 2018 and 2017, interest rate swaps not designated as hedging instruments
that are the mirror-images of the derivatives offered to clients represented a
liability of $126 thousand and $618 thousand, respectively, and were included
as part of derivative liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial
condition.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The following table shows a summary of these interest
rate swaps not designated as hedging instruments and their terms at December
31, 2018:
|
|
Notional
|
|
Fixed
|
|
Variable
|
|
Settlement
|
|
Maturity
|
Type
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
Rate Index
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps - Derivatives
Offered to Clients
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
5.5050%
|
|
1-Month LIBOR
|
|
04/11/09
|
|
04/11/19
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps - Mirror Image
Derivatives
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
5.5050%
|
|
1-Month LIBOR
|
|
04/11/09
|
|
04/11/19
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Caps
Oriental has entered into interest rate cap transactions with
various clients with floating-rate debt who wish to protect their financial
results against increases in interest rates. In these cases, Oriental
simultaneously enters into mirror-image interest rate cap transactions with
financial counterparties. None of these cap transactions qualify for hedge
accounting, and therefore, they are marked to market through earnings. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the outstanding total notional amount of interest rate caps was $150.9 million and $152.6 million, respectively. At December 31, 2018 and 2017,
the interest rate caps sold to clients represented a liability of $207 thousand
and $153 thousand, respectively, and were included as part of derivative
liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. At December
31, 2018 and 2017, the interest rate caps purchased
as mirror-images represented an asset of $207 thousand and $153 thousand,
respectively, and were included as part of derivative assets in the
consolidated statements of financial condition.
NOTE
13 — ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE
AND OTHER ASSETS
Accrued interest receivable
at December 31, 2018 and 2017 consists of
the following:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Loans, excluding acquired loans
|
$
|
30,409
|
|
$
|
46,936
|
Investments
|
|
3,845
|
|
|
3,033
|
|
$
|
34,254
|
|
$
|
49,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Accrued interest receivable at December 31, 2017,
included $39.7 million, resulting from the
loan payment moratorium. Accrued interest receivable resulting
from the loan payment moratorium has been decreasing, as most moratoriums have
expired. Some of these accrued interests are payable at the end of the loan
term.
Other assets at December 31,
2018 and 2017 consist of the following:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
$
|
9,788
|
|
$
|
9,200
|
Other repossessed assets
|
|
2,986
|
|
|
3,548
|
Core deposit and customer relationship
intangibles
|
|
3,369
|
|
|
4,687
|
Tax credits
|
|
2,277
|
|
|
4,277
|
Investment in Statutory Trust
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
1,083
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
|
37,842
|
|
|
41,898
|
|
$
|
57,345
|
|
$
|
64,693
|
Prepaid
expenses amounting to $9.8 million and $9.2 million at December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively, include prepaid municipal, property and income taxes
aggregating to $5.5million and $5.7 million, respectively.
In connection with the FDIC-assisted acquisition and the
BBVAPR Acquisition, Oriental recorded a core deposit intangible representing
the value of checking and savings deposits acquired. At December 31, 2018 and 2017 this core deposit intangible amounted to $2.5 million and $3.3 million, respectively. In
addition, Oriental recorded a customer relationship intangible representing the
value of customer relationships acquired with the acquisition of the securities
broker-dealer and insurance agency in the BBVAPR Acquisition. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, this customer relationship intangible amounted to $888 thousand and $1.4 million, respectively.
Other
repossessed assets totaled $3.0 million and $3.5 million at December 31, 2018
and 2017, respectively, that consist mainly of repossessed automobiles, which are recorded at their net realizable value.
At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, tax credits for Oriental totaled $2.3 million and
$4.3 million, respectively. These tax credits do not have an expiration date.
NOTE 14— DEPOSITS AND RELATED INTEREST
Total
deposits, including related accrued interest payable, as of December 31, 2018 and
2017 consist of the following:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
|
$
|
1,105,324
|
|
$
|
969,525
|
Interest-bearing savings and demand
deposits
|
|
2,274,423
|
|
|
2,274,116
|
Retail certificates of deposit
|
|
805,712
|
|
|
827,359
|
Institutional certificates of deposit
|
|
197,559
|
|
|
209,951
|
Total core deposits
|
|
4,383,018
|
|
|
4,280,951
|
Brokered deposits
|
|
525,097
|
|
|
518,531
|
Total deposits
|
$
|
4,908,115
|
|
$
|
4,799,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Brokered deposits include $500.8 million in certificates of
deposits and $24.3 million in money market
accounts at December 31, 2018, and $471.6
million in
certificates of deposits and $46.9 million in money market
accounts at December 31, 2017.
The
weighted average interest rate of Oriental’s deposits was 0.67% and 0.65%, respectively, at
December 31, 2018 and 2017. Interest expense for the years ended December 31,
2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Demand and savings deposits
|
$
|
12,478
|
|
$
|
11,426
|
|
$
|
12,004
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
20,475
|
|
|
18,872
|
|
|
17,249
|
|
$
|
32,953
|
|
$
|
30,298
|
|
$
|
29,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2018 and
2017, time deposits in denominations of $250 thousand
or higher, excluding accrued interest and unamortized discounts, amounted to $346.0 million and $359.6 million, respectively.
Such amounts include public funds time deposits from various Puerto Rico
government municipalities, agencies and corporations of $19.6 million and $3.5 million at a weighted
average rate of 116.4% and 0.28% at December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively.
At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, total public fund deposits from various Puerto Rico
government municipalities, agencies and corporations amounted to $207.4 million and $153.1 million, respectively.
These public funds were collateralized with commercial loans amounting to $281.2 million and $173.0 million at December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively.
Excluding
accrued interest of approximately $3.1 million, the scheduled maturities of
certificates of deposit at December 31, 2018
and 2017 are as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Within one year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three (3) months or less
|
$
|
305,088
|
|
$
|
316,382
|
Over 3 months through 1 year
|
|
545,363
|
|
|
508,285
|
|
|
850,451
|
|
|
824,667
|
Over 1 through 2 years
|
|
484,197
|
|
|
470,670
|
Over 2 through 3 years
|
|
89,340
|
|
|
137,016
|
Over 3 through 4 years
|
|
34,018
|
|
|
36,125
|
Over 4 through 5 years
|
|
42,998
|
|
|
38,623
|
|
$
|
1,501,004
|
|
$
|
1,507,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
table of scheduled maturities of certificates of deposits above includes
brokered-deposits and individual retirement accounts.
The
aggregate amount of overdrafts in demand deposit accounts that were
reclassified to loans amounted to $1.1 million and $2.2 million as of December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 15—
BORROWINGS AND RELATED INTEREST
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase
At
December 31, 2018, securities underlying agreements to repurchase were
delivered to, and are being held by, the counterparties with whom the
repurchase agreements were transacted. The counterparties have agreed to
resell to Oriental the same or similar securities at the maturity of these
agreements. The purpose of these transactions is to provide financing for
Oriental’s securities portfolio.
The following table shows Oriental’s repurchase agreements, excluding
accrued interest in the amount of $785 thousand and $369 thousand, respectively, at
December 31, 2018 and 2017:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Short-term fixed-rate repurchase
agreements, interest ranging from 2.45% to 2.95%
|
$
|
214,723
|
|
$
|
-
|
Long-term fixed-rate repurchase
agreements, interest ranging from 1.42% to 2.86% (December 31, 2017: 1.42% to
1.85%)
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
192,500
|
Total assets sold under agreements
to repurchase
|
$
|
454,723
|
|
$
|
192,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Repurchase agreements mature as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Less than 90 days
|
$
|
214,723
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Over 90-days
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
192,500
|
|
Total
|
$
|
454,723
|
|
$
|
192,500
|
|
The following securities were sold under agreements to repurchase:
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Average
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Balance of
|
|
of Underlying
|
|
Interest Rate
|
Underlying Securities
|
Securities
|
|
Borrowing
|
|
Securities
|
|
of Security
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
FNMA and FHLMC Certificates
|
$
|
496,814
|
|
$
|
454,723
|
|
$
|
487,181
|
|
|
3.01%
|
Total
|
$
|
496,814
|
|
$
|
454,723
|
|
$
|
487,181
|
|
|
3.01%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Average
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Balance of
|
|
of Underlying
|
|
Interest Rate
|
Underlying Securities
|
Securities
|
|
Borrowing
|
|
Securities
|
|
of Security
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
FNMA and FHLMC Certificates
|
$
|
207,506
|
|
$
|
192,500
|
|
$
|
205,483
|
|
|
3.03%
|
Total
|
$
|
207,506
|
|
$
|
192,500
|
|
$
|
205,483
|
|
|
3.03%
|
The
following summarizes significant data on securities sold under agreements to repurchase
as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, excluding accrued interest:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Average
daily aggregate balance outstanding
|
$
|
357,086
|
|
$
|
393,133
|
|
$
|
663,845
|
Maximum
outstanding balance at any month-end
|
$
|
457,053
|
|
$
|
606,210
|
|
$
|
902,500
|
Weighted
average interest rate during the year
|
|
2.17%
|
|
|
1.80%
|
|
|
2.83%
|
Weighted
average interest rate at year end
|
|
2.49%
|
|
|
1.63%
|
|
|
2.47%
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
Advances
are received from the FHLB-NY under an agreement whereby Oriental is required
to maintain a minimum amount of qualifying collateral with a fair value of at
least 110% of the outstanding
advances. At December 31, 2018
and 2017, these advances were secured by
mortgage and commercial loans amounting to $847.3 million and $1.3 billion, respectively.
Also, at December 31,
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
2018 and 2017,
Oriental had an additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB-NY of $762.0 million and $920.0 million, respectively. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the weighted average remaining maturity of FHLB’s
advances was 26.6 months and 3.2 months, respectively. The original terms of these advances range
between one day and seven years, and the FHLB-NY does not have the right to
exercise put options at par on any advances outstanding as of December 31,
2018.
The following table shows a summary of the advances and their terms,
excluding accrued interest in the amount of $176 thousand and $322 thousand, at December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Short-term fixed-rate advances from
FHLB, with a weighted average interest rate of 2.61% (December 31, 2017 - 1.49%)
|
|
|
33,572
|
|
35,113
|
Long-term fixed-rate advances from FHLB,
with a weighted average interest rate of 2.89% (December 31, 2017 - 2.24%)
|
|
|
43,872
|
|
64,208
|
|
|
$
|
77,444
|
|
99,321
|
Advances
from FHLB mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Under 90 days
|
|
|
33,572
|
Over one to three years
|
|
|
8,867
|
Over three to five years
|
|
|
35,005
|
|
|
$
|
77,444
|
All of the advances referred to above with maturity
dates up to the date of this report were renewed as one-month short-term
advances.
Subordinated Capital Notes
Subordinated capital notes amounted to $36.1 million
at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
In
August 2003, the Statutory Trust II, a special purpose entity of the Company,
was formed for the purpose of issuing trust redeemable preferred securities. In
September 2003, $35.0 million of trust
redeemable preferred securities were issued by the Statutory Trust II as part
of a pooled underwriting transaction.
The
proceeds from this issuance were used by the Statutory Trust II to purchase a
like amount of a floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest
debenture issued by Oriental. The subordinated deferrable interest debenture
has a par value of $36.1 million, bears interest
based on 3-month LIBOR plus 295 basis points (5.74% at December 31, 2018; 4.55.% at December 31, 2017),
is payable quarterly, and matures on September 17, 2033. It may be called at
par after five years and quarterly thereafter (next call date March 2019). The
trust redeemable preferred securities have the same maturity and call
provisions as the subordinated deferrable interest debenture. The subordinated
deferrable interest debenture issued by Oriental is accounted for as a
liability denominated as a subordinated capital note on the consolidated
statements of financial condition.
The subordinated
capital note is treated as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes. Under the
Dodd-Frank Act and the Basel III capital rules issued by the federal banking
regulatory agencies in July 2013, bank holding companies are prohibited from
including in their Tier 1 capital hybrid debt and equity securities, including
trust preferred securities, issued on or after May 19, 2010. Any such
instruments issued before May 19, 2010 by a bank holding company, such as
Oriental, with total consolidated assets of less than $15
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
billion
as of December 31, 2009, may continue to be included as Tier 1 capital.
Therefore, Oriental is permitted to continue to include its existing trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 16 – OFFSETTING OF
FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Oriental’s derivatives are subject to agreements which
allow a right of set-off with each respective counterparty. In addition, Oriental’s
securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase have a right of set-off with the respective
counterparty under the supplemental terms of the master repurchase agreements.
In an event of default, each party has a right of set-off against the other
party for amounts owed in the related agreements and any other amount or
obligation owed in respect of any other agreement or transaction between them.
Security collateral posted to open and maintain a master netting agreement with
a counterparty, in the form of cash and securities, may from time to time be
segregated in an account at a third-party custodian pursuant to an account
control agreement.
The
following table presents the potential effect of rights of set-off associated
with Oriental’s recognized financial assets and liabilities at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts
Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts
|
|
Net Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offset in the
|
|
Assets
Presented
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amount
|
|
Statement of
|
|
in Statement
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
of Recognized
|
|
Financial
|
|
of Financial
|
|
Financial
|
|
Collateral
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Condition
|
|
Condition
|
|
Instruments
|
|
Received
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Derivatives
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
(1,690)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts
Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts
|
|
Net amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offset in the
|
|
Assets
Presented
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amount
|
|
Statement of
|
|
in Statement
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
of Recognized
|
|
Financial
|
|
of Financial
|
|
Financial
|
|
Collateral
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Condition
|
|
Condition
|
|
Instruments
|
|
Received
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Derivatives
|
|
$
|
771
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
771
|
|
$
|
2,010
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
(1,239)
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts
Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offset in the
|
|
Presented
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amount
|
|
Statement of
|
|
in Statement
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
of Recognized
|
|
Financial
|
|
of Financial
|
|
Financial
|
|
Collateral
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Condition
|
|
Condition
|
|
Instruments
|
|
Provided
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Derivatives
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
$
|
(1,647)
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
|
|
454,723
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
454,723
|
|
|
487,181
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(32,458)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
455,056
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
455,056
|
|
$
|
487,181
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
$
|
(34,105)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts
Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offset in the
|
|
Presented
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amount
|
|
Statement of
|
|
in Statement
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
of Recognized
|
|
Financial
|
|
of Financial
|
|
Financial
|
|
Collateral
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Condition
|
|
Condition
|
|
Instruments
|
|
Provided
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Derivatives
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
$
|
(699)
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
|
|
192,500
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
192,500
|
|
|
205,483
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(12,983)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
193,781
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
193,781
|
|
$
|
205,483
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
$
|
(13,682)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 17 — EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLAN
Oriental
has a profit sharing plan containing a cash or deferred arrangement qualified
under Sections 1081.01(a) and 1081.01(d) of the Puerto Rico Internal
Revenue Code of 2011, as amended, (the "PR Code"), and
Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the United States Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended. This plan is subject to the provisions of Title I of
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1976, as amended (“ERISA”). This
plan covers all full-time employees of Oriental who are age 21 or older. Under
this plan, participants may contribute each year up to $18,500. Oriental's matching
contribution is 50 cents for each dollar contributed by an employee, up to 4%
of such employee’s base salary. It is invested in accordance with the
employee’s decision among the available investment alternatives provided by the
plan. This plan is entitled to acquire and hold qualified employer securities
as part of its investment of the trust assets pursuant to ERISA
Section 407. Oriental contributed $853 thousand, $835 thousand and $792 thousand in cash during
2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Oriental’s contribution becomes 100% vested
once the employee completes three years of service.
Also,
Oriental offers to its senior management a non-qualified deferred compensation
plan, where executives can defer taxable income. Both the employer and the
employee have flexibility because non-qualified plans are not subject to ERISA
contribution limits nor are they subject to discrimination tests in terms of
who must be included in the plan. Under this plan, the employee’s current
taxable income is reduced by the amount being deferred. Funds deposited in a
deferred compensation plan can accumulate without current income tax to the
individual. Income taxes are due when the funds are withdrawn.
NOTE 18 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Oriental grants
loans to its directors, executive officers and to certain related individuals
or organizations in the ordinary course of business. These loans are offered at
the same terms as loans to unrelated third parties. The activity and balance of
these loans for the years December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 was as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance
at the beginning of year
|
$
|
28,138
|
|
$
|
29,020
|
|
$
|
31,475
|
New loans and disbursements
|
|
10,388
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
2,329
|
Repayments
|
|
(10,006)
|
|
|
(3,757)
|
|
|
(4,784)
|
Balance
at the end of year
|
$
|
28,520
|
|
$
|
28,138
|
|
$
|
29,020
|
Oriental also
hires professional services amounting to $1.5 million from a related party.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 19 — INCOME TAXES
Oriental
is subject to the dispositions of the 2011 Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code,
as amended (the “Puerto Rico Code”). For 2018, the Puerto Rico Code imposed a
maximum statutory corporate
tax rate of 39%. Oriental has operations in U.S. through its wholly owned
subsidiary OPC, a retirement plan administration based in Florida. Also, in
October 2017, Oriental expanded its operations in U.S. through the Bank's wholly
owned subsidiary OFG USA. Both subsidiaries are subject to state and federal
taxes. OPC is subject to Florida state taxes and OFG USA is subject to North
Carolina state taxes. OFG USA elected to be classified as a corporation.
Under the Puerto
Rico Code, all companies are treated as separate taxable entities and are not
entitled to file consolidated tax returns. OFG Bancorp and its subsidiaries are
subject to Puerto Rico regular income tax or the alternative minimum tax
(“AMT”) on income earned from all sources. The AMT is payable if it exceeds
regular income tax. The excess of AMT over regular income tax paid in any one
year may be used to offset regular income tax in future years, subject to
certain limitations.
The components of
income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
are as follows:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Current
income tax expense
|
$
|
33,618
|
|
$
|
19,101
|
|
$
|
2,768
|
Deferred
income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
14,772
|
|
|
(3,658)
|
|
|
23,226
|
Total
income tax expense (benefit)
|
$
|
48,390
|
|
$
|
15,443
|
|
$
|
25,994
|
In relation to the exempt income level, the Bank’s
investment securities portfolio and loans portfolio generated net tax-exempt
interest income of $11.0 million at 2018 and $10.0 million at both, 2017 and
2016. OIB generated exempt income of $5.3 million, $9.6 million and $10.3 million for 2018, 2017 and
2016, respectively.
Oriental maintained an
effective tax rate lower than statutory rate for the year ended December 31,
2018, mainly by investing in tax-exempt obligations, doing business through its
international banking entity Oriental International Bank and by expanding its
subsidiary operations in the U.S., which are taxed at a lower rate.
Oriental’s income tax expense differs from
amounts computed by applying the applicable statutory rate to income before
income taxes as follow:
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
Amount
|
Rate
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Income tax expense at statutory rates
|
$
|
51,792
|
|
39.00%
|
|
$
|
26,555
|
|
39.00%
|
|
$
|
33,220
|
|
39.00%
|
Tax effect of exempt and excluded
income, net
|
|
(6,645)
|
|
-5.01%
|
|
|
(9,506)
|
|
-13.96%
|
|
|
(11,178)
|
|
-13.12%
|
Disallowed net operating loss carryover
|
|
269
|
|
0.20%
|
|
|
281
|
|
0.41%
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
1.65%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
1,504
|
|
1.13%
|
|
|
(305)
|
|
-0.45%
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
-0.01%
|
Release of unrecognized tax benefits,
net
|
|
(386)
|
|
-0.29%
|
|
|
(775)
|
|
-1.14%
|
|
|
(135)
|
|
-0.16%
|
Capital (gain) loss at preferential rate
|
|
(20)
|
|
-0.02%
|
|
|
(279)
|
|
-0.41%
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
2.81%
|
Effect of change in tax rate
|
|
4,069
|
|
3.06%
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
-
|
|
0.00%
|
Other items, net
|
|
(2,193)
|
|
-1.63%
|
|
|
(528)
|
|
-0.79%
|
|
|
296
|
|
0.34%
|
Income tax expense
|
$
|
48,390
|
|
36.44%
|
|
$
|
15,443
|
|
22.66%
|
|
$
|
25,994
|
|
30.51%
|
Oriental’s
effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2018 was 36.44%, and it was mainly affected by the discrete tax adjustments related
to recent changes in the tax legislation and changes to the proportion of
exempt income to total income. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,
effective tax rate was 22.7% and 30.5%, respectively. On December 10, 2018,
the Puerto
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Rico government enacted Act 257-2018
introducing several amendments to the Puerto Rico Code. Some of the most
relevant income tax changes include: a reduction of the maximum corporate
income tax rate to 37.5%, from 39%, and a restriction of the use of partnership
gains to offset current and accumulated operating losses generated by a
corporate partner. The change in tax rate resulted in the reduction of
Oriental’s deferred tax assets by $4.1 million, generating a discrete tax
expense for the period. In addition, the restriction on the use of partnership
gains to offset the partner’s current and accumulated operating losses,
resulted in a change in outlook as to the realizability of the Holding company’s
deferred tax assets resulting in an increase in valuation allowance of $1.5
million. The 2018 effective tax rate included discrete items and the impact of
recent tax legislation changes, that increased the effective tax rate by 2.8%. Act 257-2018 also contains
other provisions, effective January 1, 2019, however Oriental’s does not expect
that the recent tax legislation will result in significant changes on its 2019
effective tax rate.
Oriental classifies
unrecognized tax benefits in other liabilities. These gross unrecognized tax
benefits would affect the effective tax rate if realized. At December 31, 2018,
the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $875 thousand (December 31,
2017 - $1.3 million). Oriental had
accrued $81 thousand at December 31,
2018 (December 31, 2017 - $97 thousand) for the payment
of interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits and released $466 thousand due to expiration
of statute of limitation.
The
following table presents a reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
In thousands)
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
1,260
|
|
|
$
|
2,040
|
|
|
$
|
2,175
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior
years
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Additions due to new tax positions
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
Reduction for tax positions as a result
of lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
(466)
|
|
|
|
(877)
|
|
|
|
(1,363)
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
875
|
|
|
$
|
1,260
|
|
|
$
|
2,040
|
|
Oriental follows a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring
uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for
recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that
it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit,
including resolution of related appeals of litigation processes, if any. The
second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more
than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. The amount of
unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future due to new or
current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns, changes in
management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations,
litigations and legislative activity.
The statute of
limitations under the Puerto Rico Code is four years and the statute of
limitations for federal tax purposes is three years, after a tax return is due
or filed, whichever is later. Oriental is potentially subject to income tax
audits in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico for taxable years 2014 to 2017, until
the applicable statute of limitations expires. In addition, Oriental’s US
subsidiaries are potentially subject to income tax audits by the IRS for
taxable years 2015 to 2017. Tax audits by their nature are often complex and
can require several years to complete.
The determination of the deferred tax expense or benefit is
generally based on changes in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
that generate temporary differences. The carrying value of Oriental’s net
deferred tax assets assumes that Oriental will be able to generate sufficient
future taxable income based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates
and related assumptions change in the future, Oriental may be required to
record valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets resulting in
additional income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Significant components of Oriental’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December
31, 2018, and 2017 were as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Deferred
tax asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan and lease losses and other reserves
|
$
|
85,227
|
|
$
|
97,682
|
Loans
and other real estate valuation adjustment
|
|
7,842
|
|
|
10,457
|
Net
operating loss carry forwards
|
|
5,466
|
|
|
5,169
|
Alternative minimum tax
|
|
14,631
|
|
|
15,672
|
Acquired
portfolio
|
|
35,753
|
|
|
35,293
|
Other
assets allowances
|
|
966
|
|
|
858
|
Other
deferred tax assets
|
|
5,298
|
|
|
5,304
|
Total gross deferred tax asset
|
|
155,183
|
|
|
170,435
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
(4,629)
|
|
|
(3,135)
|
Net gross deferred tax assets
|
|
150,554
|
|
|
167,300
|
Deferred
tax liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC-assisted
acquisition, net
|
|
(22,825)
|
|
|
(24,564)
|
Customer
deposit and customer relationship intangibles
|
|
(1,263)
|
|
|
(1,828)
|
Building
valuation ajustment
|
|
(8,284)
|
|
|
(9,069)
|
Servicing
asset
|
|
(4,018)
|
|
|
(3,830)
|
Other
deferred tax liabilities
|
|
(401)
|
|
|
(588)
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
(36,791)
|
|
$
|
(39,879)
|
Net
deferred tax asset
|
$
|
113,763
|
|
$
|
127,421
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Oriental's net
deferred tax asset, net of a valuation allowance of $4.6 million and $3.1
million, respectively, amounted to $113.8 million and $127.4 million,
respectively. As discussed above, the deferred tax assets as of December 31,
2018 are affected by a change in tax legislation which resulted in a reduction
of $4.1 million in deferred tax assets and an increase in valuation allowance
of $1.5 million. The increase in valuation allowance was related to a change in
outlook as to the realizability of the Holding company’s deferred tax assets.
In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax asset, management considers
whether it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax
asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax asset
is dependent upon the generation of future income during the periods in which
those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the
scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future income, and
tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the assessment of
positive and negative evidence, the level of historical taxable income and
projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred
tax asset are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that
Oriental will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the
existing valuation allowances, at December 31, 2018. The amount of the deferred
tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if
estimates of future taxable income during the carry-forward period are reduced.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 20 — REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
Regulatory
Capital Requirements
OFG Bancorp (on a
consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by federal and Puerto Rico banking agencies. Failure
to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and
possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken,
could have a direct material effect on Oriental’s financial statements. Under
capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action, Oriental and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that
involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain
off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.
The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments
by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank
Act, federal banking regulators adopted
capital rules based on the framework of the Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision in “Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient
Banks and Banking Systems” (“Basel III”), which became effective January 1,
2015 for Oriental and the Bank (subject to certain phase-in periods through
January 1, 2019) and that replaced their general risk-based capital rules,
advanced approaches rule, market risk rule, and leverage rules. Among other
matters, the Basel III capital rules: (i) introduce a new capital measure
called “Common Equity Tier 1” (“CET1”) and related regulatory capital ratio of
CET1 to risk-weighted assets; (ii) specify that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1
and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments meeting certain revised
requirements; (iii) mandate that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory
capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital;
and (iv) expand the scope of the deductions from and adjustments to capital as
compared to prior regulations. The
Basel III capital rules prescribe a new standardized approach for risk
weightings that expand the risk-weighting categories from the previous four
Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a larger and more
risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, and
resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset classes.
Pursuant to the Basel III capital
rules, the minimum capital ratios requirements are as follows:
4.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;
6.0% Tier 1 capital (that is, CET1 plus
Additional Tier 1 capital) to risk-weighted assets;
8.0% Total capital (that is, Tier 1
capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets; and
4.0% Tier 1 capital to average
consolidated assets as reported on consolidated financial statements (known
as the “leverage ratio”).
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, OFG Bancorp and the Bank met all capital adequacy
requirements to which they are subject. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Bank is “well capitalized” under the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well
capitalized,” an institution must maintain minimum CET1 risk-based, Tier 1
risk-based, total risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the
tables presented below.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
OFG
Bancorp’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
Capital
|
|
Minimum to be
Well
|
|
Actual
|
|
Requirement
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
OFG Bancorp Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
990,499
|
|
20.48%
|
|
$
|
386,977
|
|
8.00%
|
|
$
|
483,721
|
|
10.00%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
928,577
|
|
19.20%
|
|
$
|
290,233
|
|
6.00%
|
|
$
|
386,977
|
|
8.00%
|
Common equity tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
811,707
|
|
16.78%
|
|
$
|
217,675
|
|
4.50%
|
|
$
|
314,419
|
|
6.50%
|
Tier 1 capital to average total assets
|
$
|
928,577
|
|
14.22%
|
|
$
|
261,125
|
|
4.00%
|
|
$
|
326,406
|
|
5.00%
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
899,258
|
|
20.34%
|
|
$
|
353,653
|
|
8.00%
|
|
$
|
442,067
|
|
10.00%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
842,133
|
|
19.05%
|
|
$
|
265,240
|
|
6.00%
|
|
$
|
353,653
|
|
8.00%
|
Common equity tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
644,804
|
|
14.59%
|
|
$
|
198,930
|
|
4.50%
|
|
$
|
287,343
|
|
6.50%
|
Tier 1 capital to average total assets
|
$
|
842,133
|
|
13.92%
|
|
$
|
242,057
|
|
4.00%
|
|
$
|
302,571
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
Capital
|
|
Minimum to be
Well
|
|
Actual
|
|
Requirement
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Bank Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
949,596
|
|
19.68%
|
|
$
|
385,992
|
|
8.00%
|
|
$
|
482,490
|
|
10.00%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
887,918
|
|
18.40%
|
|
$
|
289,494
|
|
6.00%
|
|
$
|
385,992
|
|
8.00%
|
Common equity tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
887,918
|
|
18.40%
|
|
$
|
217,120
|
|
4.50%
|
|
$
|
313,618
|
|
6.50%
|
Tier 1 capital to average total assets
|
$
|
887,918
|
|
13.68%
|
|
$
|
259,547
|
|
4.00%
|
|
$
|
324,434
|
|
5.00%
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
879,648
|
|
19.92%
|
|
$
|
353,265
|
|
8.00%
|
|
$
|
441,581
|
|
10.00%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
822,776
|
|
18.63%
|
|
$
|
264,949
|
|
6.00%
|
|
$
|
353,265
|
|
8.00%
|
Common equity tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets
|
$
|
822,776
|
|
18.63%
|
|
$
|
198,712
|
|
4.50%
|
|
$
|
287,028
|
|
6.50%
|
Tier 1 capital to average total assets
|
$
|
822,776
|
|
13.63%
|
|
$
|
241,417
|
|
4.00%
|
|
$
|
301,771
|
|
5.00%
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 21 – EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN
The Omnibus Plan
provides for equity-based compensation incentives through the grant of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units,
and dividend equivalents, as well as equity-based performance awards.
The activity in
outstanding options for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 is
set forth below:
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
Of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
Beginning of year
|
845,619
|
|
$
|
14.14
|
|
917,269
|
|
$
|
14.08
|
|
951,523
|
|
$
|
12.45
|
Options exercised
|
(101,268)
|
|
|
13.41
|
|
(71,150)
|
|
|
12.96
|
|
(24,752)
|
|
|
12.43
|
Options forfeited
|
(5,025)
|
|
|
17.05
|
|
(500)
|
|
|
15.26
|
|
(9,502)
|
|
|
16.65
|
End of year
|
739,326
|
|
$
|
14.28
|
|
845,619
|
|
$
|
14.14
|
|
917,269
|
|
$
|
14.08
|
The following table summarizes the range of
exercise prices and the weighted average remaining contractual life of the
options outstanding at December 31, 2018:
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Contract Life
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Number of
|
|
Average
|
Range
of Exercise Prices
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
(Years)
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
$5.63
to $8.45
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
|
8.28
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
|
8.28
|
11.27
to 14.08
|
|
|
313,394
|
|
|
11.81
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
313,394
|
|
|
11.81
|
14.09
to 16.90
|
|
|
265,675
|
|
|
15.40
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
228,625
|
|
|
15.29
|
16.91
to 19.71
|
|
|
156,725
|
|
|
17.00
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
78,362
|
|
|
17.44
|
|
|
|
739,326
|
|
$
|
14.28
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
623,913
|
|
$
|
13.77
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|
$
|
1,767,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,754,258
|
|
|
|
There were no options granted during 2018, 2017 and 2016. The
average fair value of each option granted would have been estimated at the date
of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes
option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options that have no restrictions and are fully transferable and
negotiable in a free trading market. Black-Scholes does not consider the
employment, transfer or vesting restrictions that are inherent in Oriental’s
stock options. Use of an option valuation model, as required by GAAP, includes
highly subjective assumptions based on long-term predictions, including the
expected stock price volatility and average life of each option grant.
The following table summarizes the activity
in restricted units under the Omnibus Plan for the years ended December 31,
2018, 2017 and 2016:
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Units
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Units
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Units
|
|
Fair Value
|
Beginning of year
|
105,800
|
|
$
|
14.19
|
|
59,800
|
|
$
|
16.64
|
|
138,400
|
|
$
|
16.17
|
Restricted units granted
|
176,250
|
|
|
12.12
|
|
83,000
|
|
|
13.31
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Restricted units lapsed
|
(24,017)
|
|
|
17.12
|
|
(33,100)
|
|
|
16.10
|
|
(76,903)
|
|
|
16.04
|
Restricted units forfeited
|
(3,983)
|
|
|
12.48
|
|
(3,900)
|
|
|
16.79
|
|
(1,697)
|
|
|
17.02
|
End of year
|
254,050
|
|
$
|
12.50
|
|
105,800
|
|
$
|
14.19
|
|
59,800
|
|
$
|
16.64
|
The total unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested restricted units to members of
management at December 31, 2018 was $2.3 million and is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.
NOTE
22 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock and Common Stock
On October 22,
2018, Oriental announced the mandatory conversion of its Series C preferred
stock into common stock. Each share of Series C preferred stock was converted
into 86.4225 shares of common stock.
There were 84,000 shares of Series C preferred stock outstanding, all of which
were converted to common stock. Upon conversion, the Series C preferred stock
is no longer outstanding and all rights with respect to the Series C preferred
stock have ceased and terminated, except the right to receive the number of
whole shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C preferred
stock and any required cash-in-lieu of fractional shares. At December 31, 2018 preferred
and common stock paid-in capital amounted $92.0 million and $59.9 million,
respectively. At December 31, 2017, preferred and common stock paid-in capital
amounted $176.0 and $52.6 million,
respectively.
Additional
Paid-in Capital
Additional paid-in
capital represents contributed capital in excess of par value of common and
preferred stock net of the costs of issuance. As of both December 31, 2018 and
2017, accumulated issuance costs charged against additional paid-in capital
amounted to $13.6 million and $10.1 million for preferred and
common stock, respectively.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Legal Surplus
The
Puerto Rico Banking Act requires that a minimum of 10% of the Bank’s net income
for the year be transferred to a reserve fund until such fund (legal surplus)
equals the total paid in capital on common and preferred stock. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Bank’s legal surplus amounted to $90.2 million and $81.5 million, respectively. The
amount transferred to the legal surplus account is not available for the
payment of dividends to shareholders.
Treasury
Stock
Under
Oriental’s current stock repurchase program, it is authorized to purchase in
the open market up to $7.7 million of its outstanding shares of common stock.
The shares of common stock repurchased are to be held by Oriental as treasury
shares. During the years ended December
31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, Oriental did not
repurchase any shares under the program.
At December 31, 2018 the number of shares that may yet be purchased
under the $70 million program is estimated at 469,675 and was
calculated by dividing the remaining balance of $7.7 million by $16.46 (closing price of Oriental's common stock at
December 31, 2018).
The activity in connection with common
shares held in treasury by Oriental for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017
and 2016 is set forth below:
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
(In
thousands, except shares data)
|
Beginning of period
|
8,678,427
|
|
$
|
104,502
|
|
8,711,025
|
|
$
|
104,860
|
|
8,757,960
|
|
$
|
105,379
|
Common shares used upon lapse of
restricted stock units
|
(87,117)
|
|
|
(869)
|
|
(32,598)
|
|
|
(358)
|
|
(46,935)
|
|
|
(519)
|
End of period
|
8,591,310
|
|
$
|
103,633
|
|
8,678,427
|
|
$
|
104,502
|
|
8,711,025
|
|
$
|
104,860
|
NOTE 23 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of income taxes, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Unrealized loss on securities
available-for-sale which are not
other-than-temporarily impaired
|
$
|
(12,654)
|
|
$
|
(3,003)
|
Income tax effect of unrealized loss on
securities available-for-sale
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
365
|
Net unrealized gain on securities
available-for-sale which are not
other-than-temporarily impaired
|
|
(10,972)
|
|
|
(2,638)
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow
hedges
|
|
14
|
|
|
(510)
|
Income tax effect of unrealized (gain)
loss on cash flow hedges
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
199
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash
flow hedges
|
|
9
|
|
|
(311)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss),
net of income taxes
|
$
|
(10,963)
|
|
$
|
(2,949)
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The following table presents changes in
accumulated other comprehensive income by component, net of taxes, for the
years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
Net
unrealized
|
|
Net
unrealized
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
gains on
|
|
loss on
|
|
other
|
|
securities
|
|
cash flow
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
available-for-sale
|
|
hedges
|
|
(loss) income
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Beginning balance
|
$
|
(2,638)
|
|
$
|
(311)
|
|
$
|
(2,949)
|
Other comprehensive loss before
reclassifications
|
|
(8,104)
|
|
|
(1,555)
|
|
|
(9,659)
|
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
(230)
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
1,645
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
(8,334)
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
(8,014)
|
Ending balance
|
$
|
(10,972)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
(10,963)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Net
unrealized
|
|
Net
unrealized
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
gains on
|
|
loss on
|
|
other
|
|
securities
|
|
cash flow
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
available-for-sale
|
|
hedges
|
|
(loss) income
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Beginning balance
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
$
|
(613)
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
Other comprehensive loss before
reclassifications
|
|
(11,563)
|
|
|
(186)
|
|
|
(11,749)
|
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
6,716
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
7,204
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
(4,847)
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
(4,545)
|
Ending balance
|
$
|
(2,638)
|
|
$
|
(311)
|
|
$
|
(2,949)
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Net
unrealized
|
|
Net
unrealized
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
gains on
|
|
loss on
|
|
other
|
|
securities
|
|
cash flow
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
available-for-sale
|
|
hedges
|
|
(loss) income
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Beginning balance
|
$
|
16,924
|
|
|
(2,927)
|
|
|
13,997
|
Other comprehensive loss before
reclassifications
|
|
(26,661)
|
|
|
(1,628)
|
|
|
(28,289)
|
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
11,946
|
|
|
3,942
|
|
|
15,888
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
(14,715)
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
(12,401)
|
Ending balance
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
$
|
(613)
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
The following table
presents reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for
the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
|
Amount
reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income
|
Affected Line
Item in Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-rate contracts
|
$
|
1,875
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
$
|
3,642
|
|
Tax effect from changes in tax rates
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
300
|
Income tax expense
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
-
|
|
|
6,896
|
|
|
12,207
|
|
Residual tax effect from OIB's change in
applicable tax rate
|
|
5
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
32
|
Net impairment losses recognized in
earnings
|
Tax effect from changes in tax rates
|
|
(235)
|
|
|
(284)
|
|
|
(293)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
1,645
|
|
$
|
7,204
|
|
$
|
15,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 24 – EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The calculation of earnings per common
share for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
Net income
|
$
|
84,410
|
|
$
|
52,646
|
|
$
|
59,186
|
Less: Dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-convertible preferred stock
(Series A, B, and D)
|
|
(6,511)
|
|
|
(6,512)
|
|
|
(6,512)
|
Convertible preferred stock
(Series C)
|
|
(5,513)
|
|
|
(7,350)
|
|
|
(7,350)
|
Income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
72,386
|
|
$
|
38,784
|
|
$
|
45,324
|
Effect of assumed conversion of the
convertible preferred stock
|
|
5,513
|
|
|
7,350
|
|
|
7,350
|
Income available to common shareholders
assuming conversion
|
$
|
77,899
|
|
$
|
46,134
|
|
$
|
52,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and share
equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
45,400
|
|
|
43,939
|
|
|
43,913
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average potential common
shares-options
|
|
142
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
37
|
Average potential common
shares-assuming conversion of convertible preferred stock
|
|
5,807
|
|
|
7,138
|
|
|
7,138
|
Total weighted average common shares
outstanding and equivalents
|
|
51,349
|
|
|
51,096
|
|
|
51,088
|
Earnings per common share - basic
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
Earnings per common share - diluted
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
During the last quarter of 2018, Oriental
converted all of its outstanding Series C Preferred Stock into Oriental common
stock. Each of the 84,000 Series C Preferred Stock shares were converted into 86.4225
shares of common stock. In computing diluted earnings per common share during
2016, 2017 and the first nine months of 2018, the 84,000 shares of Series C Preferred
Stock that remained outstanding, with a conversion rate, subject to certain
conditions, of 86.4225 shares of common stock per
share, were included as average potential common shares from the date they were
issued and outstanding. Moreover, in computing diluted earnings per common
share, the dividends declared during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017
and 2016 on the convertible preferred stock were added back as income available
to common shareholders.
For the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, weighted-average stock options with an
anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share not included in the calculation
amounted to 432,522, 932,306, and 949,134, respectively.
NOTE 25 – GUARANTEES
At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, the unamortized balance of the obligations
undertaken in issuing the guarantees under standby letters of credit
represented a liability of $23.9 million and $21.1 million, respectively.
Oriental
has a liability for residential mortgage loans sold subject to credit recourse
pursuant to FNMA’s residential mortgage loan sales and securitization programs.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the unpaid principal balance of residential
mortgage loans sold subject to credit recourse was $5.4 million
and $6.4 million, respectively.
The
following table shows the changes in Oriental’s liability for estimated losses
from these credit recourse agreements, included in the consolidated statements
of financial condition during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of
period
|
$
|
358
|
|
$
|
710
|
|
$
|
439
|
Net (charge-offs/terminations)
recoveries
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
(352)
|
|
|
271
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
346
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
$
|
710
|
The estimated
losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements were recorded as a
liability when the credit recourse was assumed, and are updated on a quarterly
basis. The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a
given loan, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The
probability of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing
would become 120 days delinquent, in which case Oriental is obligated to
repurchase the loan.
If a
borrower defaults, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, Oriental is
required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third-party investor for the
incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that Oriental
would be required to make under the recourse arrangements is equivalent to the
total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with
recourse and interest, if applicable. During 2018, Oriental repurchased
approximately $705 thousand of unpaid
principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions.
During 2017, Oriental repurchased $107 thousand of unpaid
principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions.
If a borrower defaults, Oriental has rights to the underlying collateral
securing the mortgage loan. Oriental suffers losses on these mortgage loans
when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the collateral property are less
than the outstanding principal balance of the loan, any uncollected interest
advanced, and the costs of holding and disposing the related property. At
December 31, 2018, Oriental’s liability for estimated credit losses related to
loans sold with credit recourse amounted to $346 thousand (December 31,
2017– $358 thousand).
When Oriental sells or
securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary representations and
warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. Oriental's mortgage
operations division groups conforming mortgage loans into pools which are
exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally
sold to private investors, or are sold directly to FNMA or other private investors
for cash. As required under such mortgage backed securities programs, quality
review procedures are performed by Oriental to ensure that asset guideline
qualifications are met. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics,
Oriental may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses and
bear any subsequent loss related to the loans. During the year ended December
31, 2018, Oriental repurchased $7.7 million (December 31,
2017 – $3.1 million) of unpaid principal balance in mortgage loans,
excluding mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provision referred above.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
During 2018,
2017, and 2016, Oriental recognized $556 thousand, $260 thousand and $380 thousand, respectively, in losses from the repurchase of residential mortgage loans
sold subject to credit recourse, and $160 thousand, $477 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively, in
losses from the repurchase of residential mortgage loans as a result of
breaches of customary representations and warranties.
Servicing
agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and
GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors,
including the FHLMC, require Oriental to advance funds to make scheduled
payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not
been received from the borrowers. At December 31, 2018, Oriental serviced $895.6 million (December 31, 2017
- $864.9 million) in mortgage loans
for third-parties. Oriental generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these
arrangements from the mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds when the
mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the
applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantees programs. However, in the
meantime, Oriental must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the
time the advance is outstanding. Oriental must also bear the costs of
attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition,
if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part
of the foreclosure proceedings and Oriental would not receive any future servicing
income with respect to that loan. At December 31, 2018, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by Oriental
under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $706 thousand (December
31, 2017 - $440 thousand). To the extent
the mortgage loans underlying Oriental's servicing portfolio experience
increased delinquencies, Oriental would be required to dedicate additional cash
resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur
additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.
NOTE 26— COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Loan Commitments
In the normal course of business, Oriental becomes a party to
credit-related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk to meet the
financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit, standby and commercial letters of credit, and
financial guarantees. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements
of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the
consolidated statements of financial condition. The contract or notional amount
of those instruments reflects the extent of Oriental’s involvement in
particular types of financial instruments.
Oriental’s exposure to credit losses in the event of
nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial instrument for commitments
to extend credit, including commitments under credit card arrangements, and
commercial letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amounts
of those instruments, which do not necessarily represent the amounts
potentially subject to risk. In addition, the measurement of the risks associated
with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting
transactions are identified. Oriental uses the same credit policies in making
commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet
instruments.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Credit-related
financial instruments at December 31,
2018 and 2017 were as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
$
|
541,423
|
|
$
|
485,019
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
340
|
|
|
494
|
Commitments to extend credit represent agreements to lend to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the
contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Oriental evaluates each
customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral
obtained, if it is deemed necessary by Oriental upon the extension of credit,
is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.
At December
31, 2018 and 2017, commitments to extend credit consisted mainly of undisbursed
available amounts on commercial lines of credit, construction loans, and
revolving credit card arrangements. Since many of the unused commitments are
expected to expire unused or be only partially used, the total amount of these
unused commitments does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. These lines of credit had a reserve of $627 thousand and $567 thousand, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Commercial
letters of credit are issued or confirmed to guarantee payment of customers’
payables or receivables in short-term international trade transactions.
Generally, drafts will be drawn when the underlying transaction is consummated
as intended. However, the short-term nature of this instrument serves to
mitigate the risk associated with these contracts.
The
summary of instruments that are considered financial guarantees in accordance
with the authoritative guidance related to guarantor’s accounting and
disclosure requirements for guarantees, including indirect guarantees of
indebtedness of others, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, is as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Standby letters of credit and financial
guarantees
|
$
|
23,889
|
|
$
|
21,107
|
Loans sold with recourse
|
|
5,414
|
|
|
6,420
|
Standby letters of credit and
financial guarantees are written conditional commitments issued by Oriental to
guarantee the payment and/or performance of a customer to a third party
(“beneficiary”). If the customer fails to comply with the agreement, the
beneficiary may draw on the standby letter of credit or financial guarantee as
a remedy. The amount of credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit in
the event of nonperformance is the face amount of the letter of credit or
financial guarantee. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public
and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing,
and similar transactions. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed
necessary by Oriental upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit
evaluation of the customer.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Lease Commitments
Oriental has
entered into various operating lease agreements for branch facilities and
administrative offices. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017, and 2016, amounted to $9.0 million, $9.9 million and $8.5 million, respectively, and
is included in the "occupancy and equipment" caption in the unaudited
consolidated statements of operations. Future rental commitments under leases
in effect at December 31, 2018, exclusive of taxes, insurance, and maintenance
expenses payable by Oriental, are summarized as follows:
|
Minimum Rent
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
(In
thousands)
|
2019
|
$
|
5,618
|
2020
|
|
4,293
|
2021
|
|
3,360
|
2022
|
|
2,494
|
2023
|
|
1,968
|
Thereafter
|
|
6,679
|
|
$
|
24,412
|
|
|
|
Contingencies
Oriental
and its subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings incidental
to their business. In the ordinary course of business, Oriental and its
subsidiaries are also subject to governmental and regulatory examinations.
Certain subsidiaries of Oriental, including the Bank (and its subsidiary, OIB),
Oriental Financial Services, and Oriental Insurance, are subject to regulation
by various U.S., Puerto Rico and other regulators.
Oriental
seeks to resolve all arbitration, litigation and regulatory matters in the
manner management believes is in the best interests of Oriental and its
shareholders, and contests allegations of liability or wrongdoing and, where
applicable, the amount of damages or scope of any penalties or other relief
sought as appropriate in each pending matter.
Subject
to the accounting and disclosure framework under the provisions of ASC 450, it
is the opinion of Oriental’s management, based on current knowledge and after
taking into account its current legal accruals, that the eventual outcome of
all matters would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the
consolidated statements of financial condition of Oriental. Nonetheless, given
the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters,
and the inherent unpredictability of such matters, an adverse outcome in
certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse
effect on Oriental’s consolidated results of operations or cash flows in
particular quarterly or annual periods. Oriental has evaluated all arbitration,
litigation and regulatory matters where the likelihood of a potential loss is
deemed reasonably possible. Oriental has determined that the estimate of the
reasonably possible loss is not significant.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 27 - FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Oriental follows the fair
value measurement framework under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).
Fair Value Measurement
The fair value measurement
framework defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous
market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. This framework also establishes a fair
value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
Money market investments
The fair value of money
market investments is based on the carrying amounts reflected in the
consolidated statements of financial condition as these are reasonable
estimates of fair value given the short-term nature of the instruments.
Investment securities
The fair value of investment
securities is based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices
provided by Interactive Data Corporation ("IDC"), an independent,
well-recognized pricing company. Such securities are classified as Level 1 or
Level 2 depending on the basis for determining fair value. If listed prices or
quotes are not available, fair value is based upon externally developed models
that use both observable and unobservable inputs depending on the market
activity of the instrument, and such securities are classified as Level 3. At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, Oriental did not have investment securities
classified as Level 3.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
The fair value of securities
purchased under agreements to resell is based on the carrying amounts reflected
in the consolidated statements of financial condition as these are reasonable
estimates of fair value given the short-term nature of instruments.
Derivative instruments
The fair value of the
interest rate swaps is largely a function of the financial market’s
expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly,
current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of
derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the
shape of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, as well as the
expectations for rates in the future. The fair value of most of these
derivative instruments is based on observable market parameters, which include
discounting the instruments’ cash flows using the U.S. dollar LIBOR-based
discount rates, and also applying yield curves that account for the industry
sector and the credit rating of the counterparty and/or Oriental. Certain other
derivative instruments with limited market activity are valued using externally
developed models that consider unobservable market parameters. Based on their
valuation methodology, derivative instruments are classified as Level 2 or
Level 3.
Servicing assets
Servicing assets do not trade
in an active market with readily observable prices. Servicing assets are priced
using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers servicing
fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates,
late charges, other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic
factors. Due to the unobservable nature of certain valuation inputs, the
servicing rights are classified as Level 3.
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans are carried at
the present value of expected future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate
in a discounted cash flow calculation, or the fair value of the collateral if
the loan is collateral-dependent. Expected cash flows are based on internal
inputs reflecting expected default rates on contractual cash flows. This method
of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair
value described in ASC 820-10 and would generally result in a higher value than
the exit-price approach. For loans
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
measured using the
estimated fair value of collateral less costs to sell, fair value is generally
determined based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from
appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions
involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the
provisions of ASC 310-10-35 less disposition costs. Currently, the associated
loans considered impaired are classified as Level 3.
Foreclosed real estate
Foreclosed real estate
includes real estate properties securing residential mortgage and commercial
loans. The fair value of foreclosed real estate may be determined using an
external appraisal, broker price option or an internal valuation. These
foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3 given certain internal adjustments
that may be made to external appraisals.
Other repossessed assets
Other repossessed
assets include repossessed automobiles. The fair value of the repossessed
automobiles may be determined using internal valuation and an external
appraisal. These repossessed assets are classified as Level 3 given certain
internal adjustments that may be made to external appraisals.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring and non-recurring basis are summarized below:
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Recurring fair value measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
841,857
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
841,857
|
Trading securities
|
|
-
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
360
|
Money market investments
|
|
4,930
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,930
|
Derivative assets
|
|
-
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
347
|
Servicing assets
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10,716
|
|
|
10,716
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
-
|
|
|
(333)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(333)
|
|
$
|
4,930
|
|
$
|
842,231
|
|
$
|
10,716
|
|
$
|
857,877
|
Non-recurring fair value measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired commercial loans
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
81,976
|
|
$
|
81,976
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
33,768
|
|
|
33,768
|
Other repossessed assets
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
118,730
|
|
$
|
118,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Recurring fair value measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
645,797
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
645,797
|
Trading securities
|
|
-
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
191
|
Money market investments
|
|
7,021
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
7,021
|
Derivative assets
|
|
-
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
771
|
Servicing assets
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
9,821
|
|
|
9,821
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,281)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,281)
|
|
$
|
7,021
|
|
$
|
645,478
|
|
$
|
9,821
|
|
$
|
662,320
|
Non-recurring fair value measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired commercial loans
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
72,285
|
|
$
|
72,285
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
44,174
|
|
|
44,174
|
Other repossessed assets
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,548
|
|
|
3,548
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
120,007
|
|
$
|
120,007
|
The table below presents a reconciliation of all
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016:
Level 3 Instruments Only
|
Servicing
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
9,821
|
|
$
|
9,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New instruments acquired
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
(814)
|
|
|
(590)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of servicing
assets
|
|
228
|
|
|
(1,105)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
10,716
|
|
$
|
9,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
Level 3 Instruments Only
|
Derivative
asset (S&P Purchased Options)
|
|
Servicing
Assets
|
|
Derivative
liability (S&P Embeded Options)
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
1,171
|
|
$
|
7,455
|
|
$
|
(1,095)
|
|
$
|
7,531
|
Gains (losses) included in earnings
|
|
(1,171)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
(104)
|
New instruments acquired
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,616
|
Principal repayments
|
|
-
|
|
|
(489)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(489)
|
Amortization
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
28
|
Changes in fair value of servicing
assets
|
|
-
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
276
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
9,858
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
9,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016, there were purchases and sales of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. There were no
transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during
such periods.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The table below presents quantitative information for
all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and
non-recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at December
31, 2018:
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Valuation
Technique
|
|
Unobservable
Input
|
|
Range
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing assets
|
|
$
|
10,716
|
|
Cash flow valuation
|
|
Constant prepayment rate
|
|
4.30% -9.02%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
10.00% - 12.00%
|
Collateral dependent
impaired loans
|
|
$
|
36,618
|
|
Fair value of property
or collateral
|
|
Appraised value less disposition costs
|
|
17.20% - 36.20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-collateral dependent impaired
loans
|
|
$
|
45,358
|
|
Cash flow valuation
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
4.25% - 12.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
$
|
33,768
|
|
Fair value of property
or collateral
|
|
Appraised value less disposition costs
|
|
17.20% - 36.20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other repossessed assets
|
|
$
|
2,986
|
|
Fair value of property
or collateral
|
|
Estimated net realizable value less
disposition costs
|
|
38.00% - 62.00%
|
Information about Sensitivity to Changes in
Significant Unobservable Inputs
Servicing assets – The significant
unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of Oriental’s servicing
assets are constant prepayment rates and discount rates. Changes in one factor
may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest
rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or offset the
sensitivities. Mortgage banking activities, a component of total banking and
financial service revenue in the consolidated statements of operations, include
the changes from period to period in the fair value of the mortgage loan
servicing rights, which may result from changes in the valuation model inputs
or assumptions (principally reflecting changes in discount rates and prepayment
speed assumptions) and other changes, including changes due to
collection/realization of expected cash flows.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The information
about the estimated fair value of financial instruments required by GAAP is
presented hereunder. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily
represent management’s estimate of the underlying value of Oriental.
The estimated
fair value is subjective in nature, involves uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision.
Changes in assumptions could affect these fair value estimates. The fair value
estimates do not take into consideration the value of future business and the
value of assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments. Other
significant tangible and intangible assets that are not considered financial
instruments are the value of long-term customer relationships of retail deposits, and premises and
equipment.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The estimated fair value and carrying value of Oriental’s
financial instruments at December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
447,033
|
|
$
|
447,033
|
|
$
|
485,203
|
|
$
|
485,203
|
Restricted cash
|
$
|
3,030
|
|
$
|
3,030
|
|
$
|
3,030
|
|
$
|
3,030
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
$
|
360
|
|
$
|
360
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
$
|
191
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale
|
$
|
841,857
|
|
$
|
841,857
|
|
$
|
645,797
|
|
$
|
645,797
|
Investment securities
held-to-maturity
|
$
|
410,353
|
|
$
|
424,740
|
|
$
|
497,681
|
|
$
|
506,064
|
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock
|
$
|
12,644
|
|
$
|
12,644
|
|
$
|
13,995
|
|
$
|
13,995
|
Other investments
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
3
|
Derivative assets
|
$
|
347
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
$
|
771
|
|
$
|
771
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
$
|
333
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans (including loans
held-for-sale)
|
$
|
4,106,628
|
|
$
|
4,431,594
|
|
$
|
3,842,907
|
|
$
|
4,056,329
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
$
|
34,254
|
|
$
|
34,254
|
|
$
|
49,969
|
|
$
|
49,969
|
Servicing assets
|
$
|
10,716
|
|
$
|
10,716
|
|
$
|
9,821
|
|
$
|
9,821
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
$
|
37,842
|
|
$
|
37,842
|
|
$
|
41,898
|
|
$
|
41,898
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
$
|
4,881,903
|
|
$
|
4,908,115
|
|
$
|
4,782,197
|
|
$
|
4,799,482
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
$
|
453,135
|
|
$
|
455,508
|
|
$
|
191,104
|
|
$
|
192,869
|
Advances from FHLB
|
$
|
78,503
|
|
$
|
77,620
|
|
$
|
99,509
|
|
$
|
99,643
|
Other borrowings
|
$
|
1,214
|
|
$
|
1,214
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
$
|
153
|
Subordinated capital notes
|
$
|
36,184
|
|
$
|
36,083
|
|
$
|
33,080
|
|
$
|
36,083
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
$
|
87,665
|
|
$
|
87,665
|
|
$
|
86,791
|
|
$
|
86,791
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The following methods and assumptions
were used to estimate the fair values of significant financial instruments at
December 31, 2018 and 2017:
• Cash and cash equivalents
(including money market investments and time deposits with other banks),
restricted cash, accrued interest receivable, accounts receivable and other
assets and accrued expenses and other liabilities have been valued at the
carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated statements of financial
condition as these are reasonable estimates of fair value given the short-term
nature of the instruments.
• Investments in FHLB-NY stock are
valued at their redemption value.
• The fair value of
investment securities, including trading securities and other investments, is
based on quoted market prices, when available or prices provided from
contracted pricing providers, or market prices provided by recognized
broker-dealers. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is
based upon externally developed models that use both observable and
unobservable inputs depending on the market activity of the instrument.
• The fair value of servicing asset is estimated by using a cash
flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net
servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected loan
prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors,
which are determined based on current market conditions.
• The fair values of the derivative instruments are provided by valuation
experts and counterparties. Certain derivatives with limited market activity
are valued using externally developed models that consider unobservable market
parameters.
• Fair value of derivative liabilities, which include interest rate
swaps and forward-settlement swaps, are based on the net discounted value of
the contractual projected cash flows of both the pay-fixed receive-variable
legs of the contracts. The projected cash flows are based on the forward yield
curve, and discounted using current estimated market rates.
• The fair value of the loan portfolio
(including loans held-for-sale and non-performing loans) is based on the exit
market price, which is estimated by segregating by type, such as mortgage,
commercial, consumer, auto and leasing. Each loan segment is further segmented
into fixed and adjustable interest rates. The fair value is calculated by
discounting contractual cash flows, adjusted for prepayment estimates
(voluntary and involuntary), if any, using estimated current market discount
rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan.
• The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the
amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of
fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of the
contractual cash flows, using estimated current market discount rates for
deposits of similar remaining maturities.
• The fair value of long-term borrowings, which include securities
sold under agreements to repurchase, advances from FHLB, and subordinated
capital notes is based on the discounted value of the contractual cash flows
using current estimated market discount rates for borrowings with similar
terms, remaining maturities and put dates.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE
28 – BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICE REVENUES
The following table presents the major
categories of banking and financial service revenues for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Banking service revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking accounts fees
|
|
$
|
5,878
|
|
$
|
6,903
|
|
$
|
7,511
|
Savings accounts fees
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
548
|
Electronic banking fees
|
|
|
32,431
|
|
|
28,174
|
|
|
30,081
|
Credit life commissions
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
636
|
Branch service commissions
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
811
|
|
|
620
|
Servicing and other loan fees
|
|
|
1,844
|
|
|
1,758
|
|
|
1,689
|
International fees
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
528
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
34
|
Total banking service revenues
|
|
|
43,638
|
|
|
39,468
|
|
|
41,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth management revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance income
|
|
|
6,956
|
|
|
6,652
|
|
|
7,287
|
Broker fees
|
|
|
6,996
|
|
|
7,131
|
|
|
8,385
|
Trust fees
|
|
|
10,878
|
|
|
10,930
|
|
|
10,789
|
Retirement plan and administration fees
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
971
|
Investment banking fees
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
1
|
Total wealth management revenue
|
|
|
25,934
|
|
|
25,790
|
|
|
27,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net servicing fees
|
|
|
5,024
|
|
|
3,865
|
|
|
6,058
|
Net gains on sale of mortgage loans and
valuation
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
693
|
Other
|
|
|
(562)
|
|
|
(738)
|
|
|
(1,730)
|
Total mortgage banking activities
|
|
|
4,767
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
5,021
|
Total banking and financial service
revenues
|
|
$
|
74,339
|
|
$
|
69,308
|
|
$
|
74,101
|
In May
2014 issued ASU No. 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606) to
clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue
standard that would remove inconsistencies in revenue requirements, provide a
more robust framework for addressing the revenue issues, improve comparability
in revenue recognition and to simplify the preparation of financial statements
by reducing the number of requirements t which an entity must refer.
The
standard defines revenue (ASC-606-10-20) as inflows or other enhancements of
assets of an entity or settlements of its liabilities (or a combination of
both) from delivering or producing goods, rendering services, or other
activities that constitute the entity’s ongoing major or central operations.
Revenue
is recognized when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied by
transferring control of a promised good or service to a customer, either at a
point in time or over time. Where a performance obligation is satisfied
over time, the related revenue is also recognized over time.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Following is a description of the nature and
timing of revenue streams from contracts with customers:
Banking
Revenue Services
·
Electronic banking fees are credit
and debit card processing services, use of the Bank’s ATMs by non-customers,
debit card interchange income and service charges on deposits accounts. Revenue
is recorded once the contracted service has been provided.
·
Service charges on checking and
saving accounts as consumer periodic maintenance revenue is recognized once the
service is rendered, while overdraft and late charges revenue are recorded
after the contracted service has been provided.
·
Other income as credit life
commissions, servicing and other loan fees, international fees, and
miscellaneous fees recognized as banking revenue services are out of the scope
of the 606 guideline.
Wealth
Management Revenue
·
Insurance income from commissions
and sale of annuities are recorded once the sale has been completed.
·
Brokers fees consist of two
categories:
-
Wealth management service revenue
subject to commission represents sales commissions generated by advisors for
their clients’ purchases and sales of securities on exchanges and over-the-counter,
as well as purchases of other investment products like mutual funds, and are
collected once the stand alone transactions are completed at trade date or as
earned. Also, managed account fees which are fees charged to advisors’ clients’
accounts on the Company corporate advisory platform. Fees do not cover future
services, as a result there is no need to allocate the amount received to any
other service.
-
Wealth management service revenue
not subject to commission are primarily revenues from transactions related to
mutual funds for providing distribution services and, in turn, compensates
service provider who entered into agreements with the Company to provide such
services netted against revenues, as well as trailer fees (also known as 12-b1
fess). These fees are considered variable and are recognized over time, as the
uncertainty of the fees to be received is resolved as NAV is determined and
investor activity occurs. Fees do not cover future services, as a result there
is no need to allocate the amount received to any other service.
·
Retirement plan and administration
fees are revenues related to the payment received from the clients of OPC for
provide assistance with the planning, design, administration, act as third
party administrator, daily record keeping services of retirement plans. Fees
are collected once the stand alone transaction was completed at trade date.
Fees do not cover future services, as a result there is no need to allocate the
amount received to any other service.
·
Trust fees are revenues related to
the full fiduciary services of 401k, the dividend growth IRA, and retirement
plans which include investment management, payment of distributions, if any,
safekeeping, custodial services of plan assets, servicing of Trust officers, on-going
due diligence of the Trust, and recordkeeping of transactions. Fees are billed
based on services contracted. Negotiated fees are detailed in the contract.
Fees collected in advance, are amortized over the term of the contract. Fees
are collected on a monthly basis once the administrative service has been
completed. Monthly fee does not include future services.
·
Investment banking fees as
compensation fees are out of the scope of the 606 guideline.
Mortgage
Banking Activities
·
Mortgage banking activities as
servicing fees, gain on sale of mortgage loans valuation and other are out of
the scope of the 606 guideline.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 29 –
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Oriental
segregates its businesses into the following major reportable segments of
business: Banking, Wealth Management, and Treasury. Management established the
reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate
performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors such as Oriental’s
organization, nature of its products, distribution channels and economic
characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of
the reportable segments. Oriental measures the performance of these reportable
segments based on pre-established goals of different financial parameters such
as net income, net interest income, loan production, and fees generated. Oriental’s
methodology for allocating non-interest expenses among segments is based on
several factors such as revenue, employee headcount, occupied space, dedicated
services or time, among others. These factors are reviewed on a periodical
basis and may change if the conditions warrant.
Banking includes the Bank’s
branches and traditional banking products such as deposits and commercial,
consumer and mortgage loans. Mortgage banking activities are carried out by the
Bank’s mortgage banking division, whose principal activity is to originate
mortgage loans for Oriental’s own portfolio. As part of its mortgage banking
activities, Oriental may sell loans directly into the secondary market or
securitize conforming loans into mortgage-backed securities.
Wealth Management is
comprised of the Bank’s trust division, Oriental Financial Services, Oriental
Insurance, and OPC. The core operations of this segment are financial planning,
money management and investment banking, brokerage services, insurance sales
activity, corporate and individual trust and retirement services, as well as retirement
plan administration services.
The Treasury segment
encompasses all of Oriental’s asset/liability management activities, such as
purchases and sales of investment securities, interest rate risk management,
derivatives, and borrowings. Intersegment sales and transfers, if any, are
accounted for as if the sales or transfers were to third parties, that is, at
current market prices.
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Following are the results of operations and the
selected financial information by operating segment for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth
|
|
|
|
|
Total Major
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Banking
|
|
Management
|
|
Treasury
|
|
Segments
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Interest income
|
$
|
320,084
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
$
|
40,289
|
|
$
|
360,419
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
360,419
|
Interest expense
|
|
(29,746)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(14,779)
|
|
|
(44,525)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(44,525)
|
Net interest income
|
|
290,338
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
25,510
|
|
|
315,894
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
315,894
|
Provision for loan and lease losses,
net
|
|
(55,885)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(223)
|
|
|
(56,108)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(56,108)
|
Non-interest income
|
|
53,592
|
|
|
26,457
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
80,095
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
80,095
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
(186,460)
|
|
|
(16,440)
|
|
|
(4,181)
|
|
|
(207,081)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(207,081)
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
(2,126)
|
|
|
-
|
Intersegment expenses
|
|
-
|
|
|
(788)
|
|
|
(1,338)
|
|
|
(2,126)
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
-
|
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
103,711
|
|
$
|
9,275
|
|
$
|
19,814
|
|
$
|
132,800
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
132,800
|
Income tax expense
|
|
40,447
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
4,326
|
|
|
48,390
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
48,390
|
Net income
|
$
|
63,264
|
|
$
|
5,658
|
|
$
|
15,488
|
|
$
|
84,410
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
84,410
|
Total assets
|
$
|
5,863,067
|
|
$
|
25,757
|
|
$
|
1,708,455
|
|
$
|
7,597,279
|
|
$
|
(1,013,927)
|
|
$
|
6,583,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth
|
|
|
|
|
Total Major
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Banking
|
|
Management
|
|
Treasury
|
|
Segments
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Interest income
|
$
|
311,503
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
$
|
34,091
|
|
$
|
345,647
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
345,647
|
Interest expense
|
|
(26,308)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(15,167)
|
|
|
(41,475)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(41,475)
|
Net interest income
|
|
285,195
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
|
304,172
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
304,172
|
Provision for loan and lease losses,
net
|
|
(113,108)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
|
(113,139)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(113,139)
|
Non-interest income
|
|
45,102
|
|
|
26,069
|
|
|
7,516
|
|
|
78,687
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
78,687
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
(184,567)
|
|
|
(13,486)
|
|
|
(3,578)
|
|
|
(201,631)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(201,631)
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
|
(2,352)
|
|
|
-
|
Intersegment expenses
|
|
(748)
|
|
|
(1,137)
|
|
|
(467)
|
|
|
(2,352)
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
|
-
|
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
33,478
|
|
$
|
11,499
|
|
$
|
23,112
|
|
$
|
68,089
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
68,089
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
13,057
|
|
|
4,485
|
|
|
(2,099)
|
|
|
15,443
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
15,443
|
Net income
|
$
|
20,421
|
|
$
|
7,014
|
|
$
|
25,211
|
|
$
|
52,646
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
52,646
|
Total assets
|
$
|
5,597,077
|
|
$
|
25,980
|
|
$
|
1,536,417
|
|
$
|
7,159,474
|
|
$
|
(970,421)
|
|
$
|
6,189,053
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth
|
|
|
|
|
Total Major
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Banking
|
|
Management
|
|
Treasury
|
|
Segments
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Interest
income
|
$
|
321,868
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
$
|
34,659
|
|
$
|
356,592
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
356,592
|
Interest
expense
|
|
(27,838)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(29,327)
|
|
|
(57,165)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(57,165)
|
Net
interest income
|
|
294,030
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
5,332
|
|
|
299,427
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
299,427
|
Provision
for non-covered loan and lease losses
|
|
(65,076)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(65,076)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(65,076)
|
Non-interest
income
|
|
35,587
|
|
|
26,788
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
|
66,819
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
66,819
|
Non-interest
expenses
|
|
(193,156)
|
|
|
(17,443)
|
|
|
(5,391)
|
|
|
(215,990)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(215,990)
|
Intersegment
revenue
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
(2,404)
|
|
|
-
|
Intersegment
expenses
|
|
(883)
|
|
|
(1,108)
|
|
|
(413)
|
|
|
(2,404)
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
-
|
Income
before income taxes
|
$
|
72,023
|
|
$
|
8,302
|
|
$
|
4,855
|
|
$
|
85,180
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
85,180
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
28,089
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
(5,333)
|
|
|
25,994
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
25,994
|
Net
income
|
$
|
43,934
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
$
|
10,188
|
|
$
|
59,186
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
59,186
|
Total
assets
|
$
|
5,584,866
|
|
$
|
23,315
|
|
$
|
1,837,514
|
|
$
|
7,445,695
|
|
$
|
(943,871)
|
|
$
|
6,501,824
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
NOTE 30 – OFG BANCORP (HOLDING COMPANY ONLY)
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
As
a bank holding company subject to the regulations and supervisory guidance of
the Federal Reserve Board, Oriental generally should inform the Federal Reserve
Board and eliminate, defer or significantly reduce its dividends if: (i) its
net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of
dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund
the dividends; (ii) its prospective rate of earnings retention is not
consistent with its capital needs and overall current and prospective financial
condition; or (iii) it will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its
minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. The payment of dividends by the Bank to Oriental may
also be affected by other regulatory requirements and policies, such as the
maintenance of certain regulatory capital levels. During 2018, 2017 and 2016,
Oriental Insurance paid $4.0 million, $4.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, in
dividends to Oriental. Oriental Financial Services paid $1.0 million in dividends to Oriental
during 2016 but did not pay any dividends during 2017
and 2018.
The following condensed financial information presents
the financial position of the holding company only as of December 31, 2018 and
2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December
31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
OFG BANCORP
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION INFORMATION
(Holding Company Only)
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
39,207
|
|
$
|
24,430
|
Investment
in bank subsidiary, equity method
|
|
|
983,718
|
|
|
941,198
|
Investment
in nonbank subsidiaries, equity method
|
|
|
19,341
|
|
|
20,231
|
Due
from bank subsidiary,net
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
22
|
Deferred
tax asset, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,230
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
1,616
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,043,428
|
|
$
|
989,727
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
payable
|
|
|
5,219
|
|
|
6,504
|
Due
to affiliates
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
-
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
2,033
|
Subordinated
capital notes
|
|
|
36,083
|
|
|
36,083
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
43,551
|
|
|
44,620
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
999,877
|
|
|
945,107
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
1,043,428
|
|
$
|
989,727
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
OFG BANCORP
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION
(Holding Company Only)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
$
|
477
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
$
|
174
|
Gain
on sale of securities
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
211
|
Investment
trading activities, net and other
|
|
6,003
|
|
|
4,511
|
|
|
4,066
|
Total income
|
|
6,480
|
|
|
4,699
|
|
|
4,451
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
1,370
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
|
7,179
|
Total expenses
|
|
9,885
|
|
|
8,256
|
|
|
8,549
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
|
(3,405)
|
|
|
(3,557)
|
|
|
(4,098)
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
518
|
Loss
before changes in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
(5,805)
|
|
|
(3,960)
|
|
|
(4,616)
|
Equity
in undistributed earnings from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
subsidiary
|
|
87,128
|
|
|
51,612
|
|
|
58,580
|
Nonbank
subsidiaries
|
|
3,087
|
|
|
4,994
|
|
|
5,222
|
Net
income
|
$
|
84,410
|
|
$
|
52,646
|
|
$
|
59,186
|
OFG BANCORP
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
INFORMATION
(Holding Company Only)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Net
income
|
$
|
84,410
|
|
$
|
52,646
|
|
$
|
59,186
|
Other
comprehensive loss before tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(204)
|
Other comprehensive income from bank subsidiary
|
|
(8,014)
|
|
|
(4,545)
|
|
|
(12,238)
|
Other
comprehensive loss before taxes
|
|
(8,014)
|
|
|
(4,545)
|
|
|
(12,442)
|
Income tax effect
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
41
|
Other
comprehensive loss after taxes
|
|
(8,014)
|
|
|
(4,545)
|
|
|
(12,401)
|
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
76,396
|
|
$
|
48,101
|
|
$
|
46,785
|
OFG BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
OFG BANCORP
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
(Holding Company Only)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
84,410
|
|
$
|
52,646
|
|
$
|
59,186
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed earnings from banking subsidiary
|
|
(87,128)
|
|
|
(51,612)
|
|
|
(58,580)
|
Equity in undistributed earnings from nonbanking subsidiaries
|
|
(3,087)
|
|
|
(4,994)
|
|
|
(5,222)
|
Amortization of investment securities premiums, net of accretion of discounts
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
12
|
Realized gain on sale of securities
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
211
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
1,270
|
Employee benefit adjustment
|
|
-
|
|
|
(99)
|
|
|
-
|
Deferred income tax, net
|
|
2,230
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
444
|
Net decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
372
|
|
|
(205)
|
|
|
42
|
Net (decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
203
|
|
|
(1,185)
|
|
|
800
|
Dividends from banking subsidiary
|
|
37,700
|
|
|
26,743
|
|
|
17,600
|
Dividends from non-banking subsidiary
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
6,000
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
40,101
|
|
|
26,819
|
|
|
21,763
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities and redemptions of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
702
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,888
|
Net decrease in due from bank subsidiary, net
|
|
-
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
317
|
Net decrease in due to non-bank subsidiary, net
|
|
14
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment
|
|
200
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
324
|
Capital contribution to banking subsidiary
|
|
(1,105)
|
|
|
(788)
|
|
|
(894)
|
Capital contribution to non-banking subsidiary
|
|
(24)
|
|
|
(50)
|
|
|
(68)
|
Additions to premises and equipment
|
|
(97)
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
(381)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
(1,012)
|
|
|
(550)
|
|
|
4,888
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (payments to) exercise of stock options and lapsed restricted
units, net
|
|
508
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(315)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
(24,820)
|
|
|
(24,412)
|
|
|
(24,003)
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
(24,312)
|
|
|
(24,412)
|
|
|
(24,318)
|
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
14,777
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
2,333
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
24,430
|
|
|
22,573
|
|
|
20,240
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
39,207
|
|
$
|
24,430
|
|
$
|
22,573
|
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Oriental’s
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of December 31, 2018, an evaluation was
carried out under the supervision and with the participation of Oriental’s
management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief
Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
Oriental’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon such evaluation, the
CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this
annual report on Form 10-K, Oriental’s disclosure controls and procedures
provided reasonable assurance of effectiveness in recording, processing,
summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be
disclosed by Oriental in the reports that it files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within Oriental
to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in
Oriental’s periodic reports.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
The
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting is
included in Item 8 of this report.
Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
registered public accounting firm’s report on Oriental’s internal control over
financial reporting is included in Item 8 of this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in Oriental’s internal
control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last
quarter of the year ended December 31, 2018, that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, Oriental’s internal control over
financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART
III
Items 10
through 14 are incorporated herein by reference to Oriental’s definitive proxy
statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of
the fiscal year covered by this report, except with respect to the information
set forth below under Item 12.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Oriental’s 2007
Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Omnibus
Plan”), provides for equity-based compensation incentives through the grant of
stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted units
and dividend equivalents, as well as equity-based performance awards. The
Omnibus Plan was adopted in 2007, amended and restated in 2008, and further
amended in 2010.
The following
table shows certain information pertaining to the awards under the Omnibus Plan
as of December 31, 2018:
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
Future Issuance Under Equity
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Compensation Plans (excluding
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
those reflected in column
(a))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omnibus Plan
|
|
993,376
|
(1)
|
$
|
10.63
|
(2)
|
$
|
832,146
|
|
|
993,376
|
|
$
|
10.63
|
|
|
832,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Includes 739,326 stock options and 254,050 restricted stock units.
|
(2)
Exercise price related to stock options.
|
Oriental
recorded $1.401 million, $1.109 million and $1.270 million related to
stock-based compensation expense during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017
and 2016, respectively.
Other
information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to Oriental’s
definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days
after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following financial statements are filed as part
of this report under Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’
Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules
No schedules are
presented because the information is not applicable or is included in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements or in the notes thereto
described above.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K
SUMMARY
Not
applicable.
Exhibits
|
|
Exhibit No.:
|
Description Of
Document:
|
|
|
2.1
|
Purchase and Assumption Agreement — Whole Bank,
All Deposits, dated as of April 30, 2010, among the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Eurobank, San Juan, Puerto Rico, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Oriental Bank and Trust.(1)
|
|
|
2.2
|
Acquisition Agreement dated as of June 28, 2012
between Oriental and BBVA relating to the purchase and sale of 100% of the
Common Stock of BBVAPR Holding and BBVA Securities.(2)
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
Composite Certificate of Incorporation. (3)
|
|
|
3.2
|
By-Laws.(4)
|
|
|
4.1
|
Certificate of Designation of the 7.125%
Noncumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A. (5)
|
|
|
4.2
|
Certificate of Designation of the 7.0% Noncumulative
Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B. (6)
|
|
|
4.3
|
Certificate of Designations of 7.125% Non-Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D.(7)
|
|
|
4.4
|
Form of Certificate for the 7.125% Noncumulative
Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A.(8)
|
|
|
4.5
|
Form of Certificate for the 7.0% Noncumulative
Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B. (9)
|
|
|
4.6
|
Form of Certificate for the 7.125% Non-Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D.(7)
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
Change in Control Compensation Agreement between
Oriental and José R. Fernández.(10)
|
|
|
10.2
|
Change in Control Compensation Agreement between
Oriental and Ganesh Kumar (11)
|
|
|
10.3
|
Technology Outsourcing Agreement dated as of January
26, 2007, between Oriental and Metavante Corporation.(12)
|
|
|
10.4
|
OFG Bancorp
2007 Omnibus Performance Incentive Polan, as amended and restated. (13)
|
|
|
10.5
|
Form of qualified stock option award and agreement (14)
|
|
|
10.6
|
Form of restricted stock award and agreement (15)
|
|
|
10.7
|
Form of restricted unit award and agreement (16)
|
10.8
|
Form of performance shares award and agreement (17)
|
|
|
10.9
|
Employment Agreement dated as of February 28, 2018
between Oriental and José R. Fernández
(18)
|
10.10
|
Amendment,
effective as of December 19, 2018, to Employment Agreement between Oriental
and José R. Fernández
|
|
|
10.11
|
Amendment dated as of May 31, 2018 to Technology
Outsourcing Agreement between Oriental and Metavante Corporation (19)
|
10.12
|
Termination Agreement, dated as of February 6, 2017,
among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Eurobank, San
Juan, Puerto Rico, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Oriental
Bank (20)
|
|
|
12.1
|
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed
Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends (included in Item 6 hereof )
|
|
|
21.1
|
List of subsidiaries
|
|
|
23.1
|
Consent of KPMG LLP
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 of Oriental’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on May 6, 2010.
(2)
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 of Oriental’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on July 3, 2012.
(3) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of Oriental’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 14, 2016.
(4) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of Oriental’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on January 30, 2018.
(5) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of Oriental’s registration statement on Form 8-A filed
with the SEC on April 30, 1999.
(6) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of Oriental’s registration statement on Form 8-A filed
with the SEC on September 26, 2003.
(7) Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 of Oriental’s current report on Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on November 8, 2012.
(8) Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.2 of Oriental’s registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the
SEC on April 2, 1999.
(9) Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.2 of Oriental’s registration statement on Form S-3, as amended,
filed with the SEC on September 23, 2003.
(10) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 of Oriental’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on September 13, 2005.
(11) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.14 of Oriental’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on September 13, 2005.
(12) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.23 of Oriental’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 28, 2007. Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant
to a request for confidential treatment.
(13) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of Oriental’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed
with the SEC on October 7, 2013.
(14) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of Oriental’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed
with the SEC on November 30, 2007.
(15) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of Oriental’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed
with the SEC on November 30, 2007.
(16) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of Oriental’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with
the SEC on May 8, 2015.
(17) Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of Oriental’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 2,
2018.
(18) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of Oriental’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with
the SEC on May 4, 2018.
(19) Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of Oriental’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with
the SEC on August 3, 2018. Portions of this exhibit have been
omitted pursuant to a request for confidential
treatment.
(20) Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of Oriental's current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 7,
2017.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
OFG BANCORP
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ José Rafael
Fernández
|
|
|
Dated: March 8, 2019
|
José Rafael Fernández
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Maritza
Arizmendi Díaz
|
|
|
Dated: March 8, 2019
|
Maritza Arizmendi Díaz
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Krisen
Aguirre Torres
|
|
|
Dated: March 8, 2019
|
Krisen Aguirre Torres
|
|
|
|
Vice President Financial Reporting and
Accounting Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the date
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Julian Inclán
|
|
|
Dated: March 8, 2019
|
Julian Inclán
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ José Rafael
Fernández
|
|
|
Dated: March 8, 2019
|
José Rafael Fernández
|
|
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Juan Carlos
Aguayo
|
|
|
Dated: March 8, 2019
|
Juan Carlos Aguayo
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Jorge Colón
Gerena
|
|
|
Dated: March 8, 2019
|
Jorge Colón Gerena
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Pedro
Morazzani
|
|
|
Dated: March 8, 2019
|
Pedro Morazzani
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Edwin Pérez
Hernández
|
|
|
Dated: March 8, 2019
|
Edwin Pérez Hernández
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Néstor de
Jesús
|
|
|
Dated: March 8, 2019
|
Néstor de Jesús
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|