OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP - Quarter Report: 2020 March (Form 10-Q)
United States
|
Securities and Exchange Commission
|
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
Form 10-Q
⌧ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2020
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission file number 0-20914
OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio
|
31-1359191
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
420 Third Avenue, Gallipolis, Ohio
|
45631
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(ZIP Code)
|
(740) 446-2631
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
_____________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
(Title of each class)
|
(Trading Symbol)
|
(Name of each exchange on which registered)
|
Common shares, without par value
|
OVBC
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (The NASDAQ Global Market)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data file required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated filer
|
☒
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
|
Emerging growth company
|
☐
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards
provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The number of common shares of the registrant outstanding as of May 8, 2020 was 4,787,446.
OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP.
Index
Page Number
|
||
PART I.
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
5
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
|
6
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
7
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
8
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
26
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
37
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
37
|
PART II.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
38
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
38
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
40
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
40
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
40
|
Item 5.
|
Other Information
|
40
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
41
|
Signatures
|
42
|
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
March 31,
2020
|
December 31,
2019
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash and noninterest-bearing deposits with banks
|
$
|
16,023
|
$
|
12,812
|
||||
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
|
50,648
|
39,544
|
||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
66,671
|
52,356
|
||||||
Certificates of deposit in financial institutions
|
2,360
|
2,360
|
||||||
Securities available for sale
|
112,191
|
105,318
|
||||||
Securities held to maturity (estimated fair value: 2020 - $12,115; 2019 - $12,404)
|
11,808
|
12,033
|
||||||
Restricted investments in bank stocks
|
7,506
|
7,506
|
||||||
Total loans
|
775,086
|
772,774
|
||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
(8,729
|
)
|
(6,272
|
)
|
||||
Net loans
|
766,357
|
766,502
|
||||||
Premises and equipment, net
|
20,970
|
19,217
|
||||||
Premises and equipment held for sale, net
|
649
|
653
|
||||||
Other real estate owned, net
|
325
|
540
|
||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
2,650
|
2,564
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
7,319
|
7,319
|
||||||
Other intangible assets, net
|
157
|
174
|
||||||
Bank owned life insurance and annuity assets
|
30,813
|
30,596
|
||||||
Operating lease right-of-use asset, net
|
998
|
1,053
|
||||||
Other assets
|
5,067
|
5,081
|
||||||
Total assets
|
$
|
1,035,841
|
$
|
1,013,272
|
||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
$
|
213,262
|
$
|
222,607
|
||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
632,617
|
598,864
|
||||||
Total deposits
|
845,879
|
821,471
|
||||||
Other borrowed funds
|
32,459
|
33,991
|
||||||
Subordinated debentures
|
8,500
|
8,500
|
||||||
Operating lease liability
|
998
|
1,053
|
||||||
Accrued liabilities
|
17,509
|
20,078
|
||||||
Total liabilities
|
905,345
|
885,093
|
||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (See Note 5)
|
----
|
----
|
||||||
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common stock ($1.00 stated value per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 2020 - 5,447,185 shares issued; 2019 - 5,447,185 shares issued)
|
5,447
|
5,447
|
||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
51,165
|
51,165
|
||||||
Retained earnings
|
86,748
|
86,751
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
2,848
|
528
|
||||||
Treasury stock, at cost (659,739 shares)
|
(15,712
|
)
|
(15,712
|
)
|
||||
Total shareholders’ equity
|
130,496
|
128,179
|
||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
1,035,841
|
$
|
1,013,272
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2020
|
2019
|
|||||||
Interest and dividend income:
|
||||||||
Loans, including fees
|
$
|
10,873
|
$
|
11,912
|
||||
Securities
|
||||||||
Taxable
|
597
|
618
|
||||||
Tax exempt
|
73
|
84
|
||||||
Dividends
|
66
|
113
|
||||||
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
|
162
|
319
|
||||||
Other Interest
|
14
|
12
|
||||||
11,785
|
13,058
|
|||||||
Interest expense:
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
1,509
|
1,342
|
||||||
Other borrowed funds
|
200
|
235
|
||||||
Subordinated debentures
|
72
|
94
|
||||||
1,781
|
1,671
|
|||||||
Net interest income
|
10,004
|
11,387
|
||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
3,846
|
2,377
|
||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
6,158
|
9,010
|
||||||
Noninterest income:
|
||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
493
|
503
|
||||||
Trust fees
|
68
|
64
|
||||||
Income from bank owned life insurance and annuity assets
|
217
|
178
|
||||||
Mortgage banking income
|
90
|
69
|
||||||
Debit / credit card interchange income
|
943
|
914
|
||||||
Loss on other real estate owned
|
(101
|
)
|
----
|
|||||
Tax preparation fees
|
615
|
----
|
||||||
Litigation settlement
|
2,000
|
----
|
||||||
Other
|
117
|
118
|
||||||
4,442
|
1,846
|
|||||||
Noninterest expense:
|
||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits
|
5,455
|
5,536
|
||||||
Occupancy
|
432
|
453
|
||||||
Furniture and equipment
|
262
|
263
|
||||||
Professional fees
|
598
|
672
|
||||||
Marketing expense
|
268
|
270
|
||||||
FDIC insurance
|
----
|
3
|
||||||
Data processing
|
599
|
535
|
||||||
Software
|
381
|
411
|
||||||
Foreclosed assets
|
43
|
106
|
||||||
Amortization of intangibles
|
17
|
31
|
||||||
Other
|
1,464
|
1,288
|
||||||
9,519
|
9,568
|
|||||||
Income before income taxes
|
1,081
|
1,288
|
||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
79
|
95
|
||||||
NET INCOME
|
$
|
1,002
|
$
|
1,193
|
||||
Earnings per share
|
$
|
.21
|
$
|
.25
|
||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||
Three months ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2020
|
2019
|
|||||||
Net Income
|
$
|
1,002
|
$
|
1,193
|
||||
Other comprehensive income:
|
||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on available for sale securities
|
2,937
|
1,996
|
||||||
Related tax expense
|
(617
|
)
|
(419
|
)
|
||||
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
2,320
|
1,577
|
||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
$
|
3,322
|
$
|
2,770
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
5
OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter-to-date
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Total
Shareholders' Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2020
|
$
|
5,447
|
$
|
51,165
|
$
|
86,751
|
$
|
528
|
$
|
(15,712
|
)
|
$
|
128,179
|
|||||||||||
Net income
|
----
|
----
|
1,002
|
----
|
----
|
1,002
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
2,320
|
----
|
2,320
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends, $.21 per share
|
----
|
----
|
(1,005
|
)
|
----
|
----
|
(1,005
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2020
|
$
|
5,447
|
$
|
51,165
|
$
|
86,748
|
$
|
2,848
|
$
|
(15,712
|
)
|
$
|
130,496
|
|||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2019
|
$
|
5,400
|
$
|
49,477
|
$
|
80,844
|
$
|
(2,135
|
)
|
$
|
(15,712
|
)
|
$
|
117,874
|
||||||||||
Net income
|
----
|
----
|
1,193
|
----
|
----
|
1,193
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
1,577
|
----
|
1,577
|
||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued to ESOP, 8,333 shares
|
8
|
320
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
328
|
||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued through
dividend reinvestment, 10,000 shares
|
10
|
365
|
----
|
----
|
----
|
375
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends, $.21 per share
|
----
|
----
|
(995
|
)
|
----
|
----
|
(995
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2019
|
$
|
5,418
|
$
|
50,162
|
$
|
81,042
|
$
|
(558
|
)
|
$
|
(15,712
|
)
|
$
|
120,352
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
6
OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||
Three months ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2020
|
2019
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities:
|
$
|
1,819
|
$
|
1,358
|
||||
Investing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
|
6,310
|
3,881
|
||||||
Purchases of securities available for sale
|
(10,287
|
)
|
(10,035
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity
|
215
|
215
|
||||||
Net change in loans
|
(3,720
|
)
|
(4,717
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
|
147
|
----
|
||||||
Purchases of premises and equipment
|
(2,049
|
)
|
(1,246
|
)
|
||||
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
(9,384
|
)
|
(11,902
|
)
|
||||
Financing activities:
|
||||||||
Change in deposits
|
24,417
|
15,017
|
||||||
Proceeds from common stock through dividend reinvestment
|
----
|
375
|
||||||
Cash dividends
|
(1,005
|
)
|
(995
|
)
|
||||
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
(1,383
|
)
|
(1,508
|
)
|
||||
Change in other long-term borrowings
|
(149
|
)
|
(628
|
)
|
||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
21,880
|
12,261
|
||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
14,315
|
1,717
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
52,356
|
71,180
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
66,671
|
$
|
72,897
|
||||
Supplemental disclosure:
|
||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$
|
1,805
|
$
|
1,434
|
||||
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned
|
33
|
40
|
||||||
Initial recognition of operating lease right-of-use asset
|
----
|
1,280
|
||||||
Operating lease liability arising from obtaining right-of-use asset
|
----
|
1,280
|
||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 1- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ohio Valley Banc Corp. (“Ohio Valley”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Ohio Valley Bank
Company (the “Bank”), Loan Central, Inc. (“Loan Central”), a consumer finance company, Ohio Valley Financial Services Agency, LLC, an insurance agency, and OVBC Captive, Inc. (the “Captive”), a limited purpose property and casualty insurance
company. The Bank has one wholly-owned subsidiary, Ohio Valley REO, LLC (“Ohio Valley REO”), an Ohio limited liability company, to which the Bank transfers certain real estate acquired by the Bank through foreclosure for sale by Ohio Valley REO.
Ohio Valley and its subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “Company”. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
These interim financial statements are prepared by the Company without audit and reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature which, in the opinion of management, are necessary
to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company at March 31, 2020, and its results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be anticipated for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not purport to contain all the necessary
financial disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) that might otherwise be necessary in the circumstances. The Annual Report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2019 contains consolidated
financial statements and related notes which should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements for 2019 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation for 2020. These reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity.
RECENT EVENTS: In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) as a global pandemic, which continues to spread throughout the United States and around the world.
COVID-19 has negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted global supply chains and increased unemployment levels. The resulting temporary closure of many businesses and the implementation of social distancing and sheltering-in-place policies
has, and may continue to impact, many of the Company’s customers. While the full effects of the pandemic remain unknown, the Company is committed to supporting its customers, employees and communities during this difficult time.
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), was signed into law. The goal of the CARES Act is to prevent a severe economic downturn through various measures, including direct
financial aid to American families and economic stimulus to significantly impacted industry sectors. Certain provisions within the CARES Act encourage financial institutions to practice prudent efforts to work with borrowers impacted by COVID-19.
Under these provisions, modifications deemed to be COVID-19-related would not be considered a troubled debt restructuring if the loan was not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019 and the deferral was executed between March 1, 2020 and
the earlier of 60 days after the date of termination of the COVID-19 national emergency or December 31, 2020. Also under the CARE Act, the Bank is a lender for the Small Business Administration's (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"), a
program that provides assistance to small businesses. The PPP provides small businesses with funds to pay up to 8 weeks of payroll costs, including benefits. The funds are provided in the form of loans that will be fully forgiven when used for
payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities. The payments on these loans will be deferred for six months. Forgiveness of the PPP loans is based on the employer maintaining or quickly rehiring employees and maintaining salary levels.
USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Company conform to US GAAP established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and actual results could differ.
8
NOTE 1- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
The potential financial impact of COVID 19 is unknown at this time. However, if these actions are sustained, it may adversely impact several industries within our geographic footprint and impair the ability of our
customers to fulfill their contractual obligations to the Company. This could cause the Company to experience a material adverse effect on our business operations, asset valuations, financial condition, and results of operations. Effects may
include:
• The provision for loan losses could increase. Continued uncertainty regarding the severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and
related economic effects will continue to affect the accounting for loan losses. It also is possible that asset quality could worsen, and loan charge-offs increase. The Company is actively participating in the PPP program providing loans to small
businesses negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. PPP loans are fully guaranteed by the U.S. government, if that should change, the Company could be required to increase its allowance for loan losses through an additional provision for loan
losses charged to earnings.
• Valuation and fair value measurement challenges may occur. Material adverse impacts may include all or a combination of valuation
impairments on the Company’s securities, impaired loans, other real estate owned, and interest rate swap agreements.
INDUSTRY SEGMENT INFORMATION: Internal financial information is primarily reported and aggregated in two lines of business: banking and consumer finance.
EARNINGS PER SHARE: Earnings per share are computed based on net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average common shares outstanding were
4,787,446 and 4,748,474 for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Ohio Valley had no dilutive effect and no potential common shares issuable under stock options or other agreements for any period presented.
ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARD UPDATES (“ASU”): In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This ASU eliminates, adds
and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Among the changes, entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy but will be
required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early
adoption is permitted. For non-public entities, this ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE TO BE ADOPTED IN FUTURE PERIODS: In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses”. ASU 2016-13 requires
entities to replace the current “incurred loss” model with an “expected loss” model, which is referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model. These expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date are to be
based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU will also require enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and
judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an entity’s portfolio. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts
recorded in the financial statements. A CECL steering committee has developed a CECL model and is evaluating the source data, various credit loss methodologies and model results in relation to the new ASU guidance. Management expects to recognize
a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective. Management expects the adoption will result in a material increase to the allowance
for loan losses balance. At this time, the impact is being evaluated. On October 16, 2019, the FASB confirmed it would delay the effective date of this ASU for smaller reporting companies, such as the Company, until fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2022.
9
NOTE 2 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The following is a description of the Company’s valuation methodologies used to measure and disclose the fair values of its financial assets and liabilities on a recurring or nonrecurring basis:
Securities: The fair values for securities are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are
calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level
3). During times when trading is more liquid, broker quotes are used (if available) to validate the model. Rating agency and industry research reports as well as defaults and deferrals on individual securities are reviewed and incorporated into the
calculations.
Impaired Loans: At the time a loan is considered impaired, it is valued at the lower of cost or fair value. Impaired loans carried at fair value generally receive specific
allocations of the allowance for loan losses. For collateral dependent loans, fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable
sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and
typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based
on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business, resulting in a Level 3 fair value classification. Impaired loans are
evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.
Other Real Estate Owned: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are
subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including
comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually
significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. In some instances, fair value adjustments can be made based on a quoted price from an observable input, such as a purchase agreement. Such
adjustments would be classified as a Level 2 classification.
10
NOTE 2 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
Appraisals for both collateral-dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned are performed by certified general appraisers (for commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential
properties) whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Company. Once received, a member of management reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal as well as the overall resulting fair value in
comparison with management’s own assumptions of fair value based on factors that include recent market data or industry-wide statistics.
On an as-needed basis, the Company reviews the fair value of collateral, taking into consideration current market data, as well as all selling costs that typically approximate 10%.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements: The fair value of interest rate swap agreements is determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash
payments (or receipts) and the discounted expected variable cash receipts (or payments). The variable cash receipts (or payments) are based on the expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observed market interest rate
curves (Level 2).
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2020 Using
|
||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||
U.S. Government sponsored entity securities
|
----
|
$
|
16,016
|
----
|
||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities, residential
|
----
|
96,175
|
----
|
|||||||||
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
----
|
985
|
----
|
|||||||||
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
----
|
(985
|
)
|
----
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using
|
||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||
U.S. Government sponsored entity securities
|
----
|
$
|
16,736
|
----
|
||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities, residential
|
----
|
88,582
|
----
|
|||||||||
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
----
|
465
|
----
|
|||||||||
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
----
|
(465
|
)
|
----
|
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2020 or 2019.
11
NOTE 2 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2020, Using
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||
Impaired loans:
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
----
|
----
|
$
|
459
|
||||||||
Commercial and Industrial
|
----
|
----
|
777
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019, Using
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||
Impaired loans:
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
----
|
----
|
$
|
1,644
|
||||||||
Commercial and Industrial
|
----
|
----
|
4,559
|
At March 31, 2020, the recorded investment of impaired loans measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral for collateral-dependent loans totaled $2,090, with a corresponding valuation allowance of $854,
resulting in an increase of $854 in provision expense during the three months ended March 31, 2020, with no corresponding charge-offs recognized. This is compared to an increase of $163 in provision expense during the three months ended March 31,
2019, with no corresponding charge-offs recognized. At December 31, 2019, the recorded investment of impaired loans measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral for collateral-dependent loans totaled $7,010, with a corresponding
valuation allowance of $807, resulting in an increase of $807 in provision expense during the year ended December 31, 2019, with no corresponding charge-offs recognized.
There was no other real estate owned that was measured at fair value less costs to sell at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. There were no corresponding write downs during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and
2019.
The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
March 31, 2020
|
Fair
Value
|
Valuation
Technique(s)
|
Unobservable
Input(s)
|
Range
|
(Weighted
Average) |
|||||||||
Impaired loans:
|
||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
$
|
459
|
Sales approach
|
Adjustment to comparables
|
10% to 50%
|
27.8%
|
|
|||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
777
|
Sales approach
|
Adjustment to comparables
|
24% to 50%
|
28.9%
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Fair
Value
|
Valuation
Technique(s)
|
Unobservable
Input(s)
|
Range
|
(Weighted
Average) |
|||||||||
Impaired loans:
|
||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
$
|
1,644
|
Sales approach
|
Adjustment to comparables
|
0% to 20%
|
9.7%
|
|
|||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
4,559
|
Sales approach
|
Adjustment to comparables
|
0% to 61%
|
10.3%
|
|
12
NOTE 2 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2020 Using
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying
Value
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
66,671
|
$
|
66,671
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
66,671
|
||||||||||
Certificates of deposit in financial institutions
|
2,360
|
----
|
2,360
|
----
|
2,360
|
|||||||||||||||
Securities available for sale
|
112,191
|
----
|
112,191
|
----
|
112,191
|
|||||||||||||||
Securities held to maturity
|
11,808
|
----
|
6,420
|
5,695
|
12,115
|
|||||||||||||||
Loans, net
|
766,357
|
----
|
----
|
761,147
|
761,147
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
985
|
----
|
985
|
----
|
985
|
|||||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
2,650
|
----
|
385
|
2,265
|
2,650
|
|||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
845,879
|
213,262
|
635,176
|
----
|
848,438
|
|||||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds
|
32,459
|
----
|
33,792
|
----
|
33,792
|
|||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures
|
8,500
|
----
|
5,979
|
----
|
5,979
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
985
|
----
|
985
|
----
|
985
|
|||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
1,565
|
1
|
1,564
|
----
|
1,565
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying
Value
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
52,356
|
$
|
52,356
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
52,356
|
||||||||||
Certificates of deposit in financial institutions
|
2,360
|
----
|
2,360
|
----
|
2,360
|
|||||||||||||||
Securities available for sale
|
105,318
|
----
|
105,318
|
----
|
105,318
|
|||||||||||||||
Securities held to maturity
|
12,033
|
----
|
6,446
|
5,958
|
12,404
|
|||||||||||||||
Loans, net
|
766,502
|
----
|
----
|
771,285
|
771,285
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
465
|
----
|
465
|
----
|
465
|
|||||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
2,564
|
----
|
315
|
2,249
|
2,564
|
|||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
821,471
|
222,607
|
599,937
|
----
|
822,544
|
|||||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds
|
33,991
|
----
|
34,345
|
----
|
34,345
|
|||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures
|
8,500
|
----
|
6,275
|
----
|
6,275
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
465
|
----
|
465
|
----
|
465
|
|||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
1,589
|
3
|
1,586
|
----
|
1,589
|
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or
discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are
based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
13
NOTE 3 – SECURITIES
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale and securities held to maturity at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and the corresponding amounts of
gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) and gross unrecognized gains and losses:
Securities Available for Sale
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
March 31, 2020
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government sponsored entity securities
|
$
|
15,621
|
$
|
395
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
16,016
|
||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities, residential
|
92,965
|
3,212
|
(2
|
)
|
96,175
|
|||||||||||
Total securities
|
$
|
108,586
|
$
|
3,607
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
112,191
|
|||||||
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government sponsored entity securities
|
$
|
16,579
|
$
|
163
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
$
|
16,736
|
|||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities, residential
|
88,071
|
807
|
(296
|
)
|
88,582
|
|||||||||||
Total securities
|
$
|
104,650
|
$
|
970
|
$
|
(302
|
)
|
$
|
105,318
|
Securities Held to Maturity
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross Unrecognized
Gains
|
Gross Unrecognized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
March 31, 2020
|
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
$
|
11,806
|
$
|
308
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
12,113
|
|||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities, residential
|
2
|
----
|
----
|
2
|
||||||||||||
Total securities
|
$
|
11,808
|
$
|
308
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
12,115
|
|||||||
December 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
$
|
12,031
|
$
|
372
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
12,402
|
|||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities, residential
|
2
|
----
|
----
|
2
|
||||||||||||
Total securities
|
$
|
12,033
|
$
|
372
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
12,404
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at March 31, 2020, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain
issuers may have the right to call or prepay the debt obligations prior to their contractual maturities. Securities not due at a single maturity are shown separately.
Available for Sale
|
Held to Maturity
|
|||||||||||||||
Debt Securities:
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
Due in one year or less
|
$
|
7,289
|
$
|
7,404
|
$
|
639
|
$
|
641
|
||||||||
Due in over one to five years
|
8,332
|
8,612
|
6,802
|
7,014
|
||||||||||||
Due in over five to ten years
|
----
|
----
|
4,365
|
4,458
|
||||||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities, residential
|
92,965
|
96,175
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||
Total debt securities
|
$
|
108,586
|
$
|
112,191
|
$
|
11,808
|
$
|
12,115
|
The following table summarizes securities with unrealized losses at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, aggregated by major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position:
March 31, 2020
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
12 Months or More
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Unrealized Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Unrealized Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Unrealized Loss
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
securities, residential
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
198
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
198
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
||||||||||
Total available for sale
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
198
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
198
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
12 Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Unrecognized Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Unrecognized Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Unrecognized Loss
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Securities Held to Maturity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
political subdivisions
|
$
|
204
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
204
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
||||||||||
Total held to maturity
|
$
|
204
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
204
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
14
NOTE 3 – SECURITIES (Continued)
December 31, 2019
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
12 Months or More
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Unrealized Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Unrealized Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Unrealized Loss
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government sponsored
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
entity securities
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
1,999
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
$
|
1,999
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
||||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
securities, residential
|
15,041
|
(84
|
)
|
21,344
|
(212
|
)
|
36,385
|
(296
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Total available for sale
|
$
|
15,041
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
$
|
23,343
|
$
|
(218
|
)
|
$
|
38,384
|
$
|
(302
|
)
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
12 Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Unrecognized Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Unrecognized Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Unrecognized Loss
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Securities Held to Maturity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
political subdivisions
|
$
|
204
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
204
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
||||||||||
Total held to maturity
|
$
|
204
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
204
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
There were no sales of investment securities during the three months ended March 31, 2020 or 2019. Unrealized losses on the Company’s debt securities
have not been recognized into income because the issuers’ securities are of high credit quality as of March 31, 2020, and management does not intend to sell, and it is likely that management will not be required to sell, the securities prior to their
anticipated recovery. Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 represents an other-than-temporary impairment.
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Loans are comprised of the following:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2020
|
2019
|
|||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
307,879
|
$
|
310,253
|
||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
55,515
|
55,825
|
||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
137,141
|
131,398
|
||||||
Construction
|
34,892
|
34,913
|
||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
102,570
|
100,023
|
||||||
Consumer:
|
||||||||
Automobile
|
61,729
|
63,770
|
||||||
Home equity
|
21,894
|
22,882
|
||||||
Other
|
53,466
|
53,710
|
||||||
775,086
|
772,774
|
|||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
(8,729
|
)
|
(6,272
|
)
|
||||
Loans, net
|
$
|
766,357
|
$
|
766,502
|
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:
March 31, 2020
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Commercial
and Industrial
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$
|
1,250
|
$
|
1,928
|
$
|
1,447
|
$
|
1,647
|
$
|
6,272
|
||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
926
|
1,572
|
624
|
724
|
3,846
|
|||||||||||||||
Loans charged off
|
(198
|
)
|
(516
|
)
|
(33
|
)
|
(889
|
)
|
(1,636
|
)
|
||||||||||
Recoveries
|
24
|
44
|
7
|
172
|
247
|
|||||||||||||||
Total ending allowance balance
|
$
|
2,002
|
$
|
3,028
|
$
|
2,045
|
$
|
1,654
|
$
|
8,729
|
March 31, 2019
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Commercial
and Industrial
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$
|
1,583
|
$
|
2,186
|
$
|
1,063
|
$
|
1,896
|
$
|
6,728
|
||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
813
|
393
|
473
|
699
|
2,378
|
|||||||||||||||
Loans charged-off
|
(329
|
)
|
(141
|
)
|
(233
|
)
|
(658
|
)
|
(1,361
|
)
|
||||||||||
Recoveries
|
12
|
14
|
12
|
230
|
268
|
|||||||||||||||
Total ending allowance balance
|
$
|
2,079
|
$
|
2,452
|
$
|
1,315
|
$
|
2,167
|
$
|
8,013
|
15
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)
The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment of loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of March 31, 2020 and December 31,
2019:
March 31, 2020
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Commercial
and Industrial
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
409
|
$
|
445
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
854
|
||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
2,002
|
2,619
|
1,600
|
1,654
|
7,875
|
|||||||||||||||
Total ending allowance balance
|
$
|
2,002
|
$
|
3,028
|
$
|
2,045
|
$
|
1,654
|
$
|
8,729
|
||||||||||
Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
|
$
|
428
|
$
|
5,088
|
$
|
5,207
|
$
|
403
|
$
|
11,126
|
||||||||||
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
|
307,451
|
222,460
|
97,363
|
136,686
|
763,960
|
|||||||||||||||
Total ending loans balance
|
$
|
307,879
|
$
|
227,548
|
$
|
102,570
|
$
|
137,089
|
$
|
775,086
|
December 31, 2019
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Commercial
and Industrial
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
385
|
$
|
303
|
$
|
119
|
$
|
807
|
||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
1,250
|
1,543
|
1,144
|
1,528
|
5,465
|
|||||||||||||||
Total ending allowance balance
|
$
|
1,250
|
$
|
1,928
|
$
|
1,447
|
$
|
1,647
|
$
|
6,272
|
||||||||||
Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
|
$
|
438
|
$
|
11,300
|
$
|
4,910
|
$
|
487
|
$
|
17,135
|
||||||||||
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
|
309,815
|
210,836
|
95,113
|
139,875
|
755,639
|
|||||||||||||||
Total ending loans balance
|
$
|
310,253
|
$
|
222,136
|
$
|
100,023
|
$
|
140,362
|
$
|
772,774
|
The following tables present information related to loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
March 31, 2020
|
Unpaid
Principal Balance
|
Recorded
Investment
|
Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated
|
|||||||||
With an allowance recorded
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
$
|
868
|
$
|
868
|
$
|
409
|
||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
1,222
|
1,222
|
445
|
|||||||||
With no related allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
428
|
428
|
----
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
3,201
|
3,201
|
----
|
|||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
1,019
|
1,019
|
----
|
|||||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
3,985
|
3,985
|
----
|
|||||||||
Consumer:
|
||||||||||||
Home equity
|
403
|
403
|
----
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
11,126
|
$
|
11,126
|
$
|
854
|
16
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)
December 31, 2019
|
Unpaid
Principal Balance
|
Recorded
Investment
|
Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated
|
|||||||||
With an allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
$
|
2,030
|
$
|
2,030
|
$
|
385
|
||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
4,861
|
4,861
|
303
|
|||||||||
Consumer:
|
||||||||||||
Automobile
|
8
|
8
|
8
|
|||||||||
Other
|
111
|
111
|
111
|
|||||||||
With no related allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
438
|
438
|
----
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
1,778
|
1,778
|
----
|
|||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
7,492
|
7,492
|
----
|
|||||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
49
|
49
|
----
|
|||||||||
Consumer:
|
||||||||||||
Home equity
|
368
|
368
|
----
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
17,135
|
$
|
17,135
|
$
|
807
|
The following tables present information related to loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:
Three months ended March 31, 2020
|
||||||||||||
Average
Impaired Loans
|
Interest Income
Recognized
|
Cash Basis Interest Recognized
|
||||||||||
With an allowance recorded
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
$
|
875
|
$
|
9
|
$
|
9
|
||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
611
|
7
|
7
|
|||||||||
With no related allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
433
|
4
|
4
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
2,754
|
48
|
48
|
|||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
1,033
|
11
|
11
|
|||||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
4,279
|
66
|
66
|
|||||||||
Consumer:
|
||||||||||||
Home equity
|
385
|
5
|
5
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
10,370
|
$
|
150
|
$
|
150
|
Three months ended March 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||
Average
Impaired Loans
|
Interest Income
Recognized
|
Cash Basis Interest Recognized
|
||||||||||
With an allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
1,255
|
$
|
7
|
$
|
7
|
||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
78
|
2
|
2
|
|||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
360
|
----
|
----
|
|||||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
984
|
36
|
36
|
|||||||||
Consumer:
|
||||||||||||
Home equity
|
3
|
----
|
----
|
|||||||||
With no related allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
451
|
4
|
4
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
2,862
|
52
|
52
|
|||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
4,177
|
112
|
112
|
|||||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
5,258
|
84
|
84
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
15,428
|
$
|
297
|
$
|
297
|
17
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)
The recorded investment of a loan is its carrying value excluding accrued interest and deferred loan fees.
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing include both smaller balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified as
impaired loans.
The Company transfers loans to other real estate owned, at fair value less cost to sell, in the period the Company obtains physical possession of the property (through legal title or through a deed in
lieu). As of March 31, 2020, there were no other real estate owned for residential real estate properties, as compared to $68 at December 31, 2019. In addition, nonaccrual residential mortgage loans that are in the process of foreclosure had a
recorded investment of $831 and $1,780 as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
The following table presents the recorded investment of nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing by class of loans as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
March 31, 2020
|
Loans Past Due
90 Days And
Still Accruing
|
Nonaccrual
|
||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
360
|
$
|
5,867
|
||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
60
|
348
|
||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
----
|
724
|
||||||
Construction
|
----
|
237
|
||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
1,192
|
534
|
||||||
Consumer:
|
||||||||
Automobile
|
116
|
77
|
||||||
Home equity
|
----
|
359
|
||||||
Other
|
255
|
49
|
||||||
Total
|
$
|
1,983
|
$
|
8,195
|
December 31, 2019
|
Loans Past Due
90 Days And
Still Accruing
|
Nonaccrual
|
||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
255
|
$
|
6,119
|
||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
----
|
863
|
||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
----
|
804
|
||||||
Construction
|
----
|
229
|
||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
----
|
590
|
||||||
Consumer:
|
||||||||
Automobile
|
239
|
61
|
||||||
Home equity
|
----
|
392
|
||||||
Other
|
395
|
91
|
||||||
Total
|
$
|
889
|
$
|
9,149
|
18
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)
The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment of past due loans by class of loans as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
March 31, 2020
|
30-59
Days
Past Due
|
60-89
Days
Past Due
|
90 Days
Or More
Past Due
|
Total
Past Due
|
Loans Not
Past Due
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
3,499
|
$
|
1,153
|
$
|
2,456
|
$
|
7,108
|
$
|
300,771
|
$
|
307,879
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
1,951
|
----
|
313
|
2,264
|
53,251
|
55,515
|
||||||||||||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
1,457
|
----
|
601
|
2,058
|
135,083
|
137,141
|
||||||||||||||||||
Construction
|
52
|
----
|
68
|
120
|
34,772
|
34,892
|
||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
287
|
47
|
1,726
|
2,060
|
100,510
|
102,570
|
||||||||||||||||||
Consumer:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automobile
|
1,200
|
275
|
190
|
1,665
|
60,064
|
61,729
|
||||||||||||||||||
Home equity
|
212
|
80
|
255
|
547
|
21,347
|
21,894
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
519
|
205
|
264
|
988
|
52,478
|
53,466
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
9,177
|
$
|
1,760
|
$
|
5,873
|
$
|
16,810
|
$
|
758,276
|
$
|
775,086
|
December 31, 2019
|
30-59
Days
Past Due
|
60-89
Days
Past Due
|
90 Days
Or More
Past Due
|
Total
Past Due
|
Loans Not
Past Due
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
4,015
|
$
|
1,314
|
$
|
1,782
|
$
|
7,111
|
$
|
303,142
|
$
|
310,253
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
383
|
59
|
144
|
586
|
55,239
|
55,825
|
||||||||||||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
12
|
----
|
697
|
709
|
130,689
|
131,398
|
||||||||||||||||||
Construction
|
186
|
19
|
49
|
254
|
34,659
|
34,913
|
||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
1,320
|
312
|
241
|
1,873
|
98,150
|
100,023
|
||||||||||||||||||
Consumer:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automobile
|
986
|
329
|
246
|
1,561
|
62,209
|
63,770
|
||||||||||||||||||
Home equity
|
106
|
18
|
279
|
403
|
22,479
|
22,882
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
559
|
139
|
443
|
1,141
|
52,569
|
53,710
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
7,567
|
$
|
2,190
|
$
|
3,881
|
$
|
13,638
|
$
|
759,136
|
$
|
772,774
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
A troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) occurs when the Company has agreed to a loan modification in the form of a concession for a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulty. All TDRs are
considered to be impaired. The modification of the terms of such loans included one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan; an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than
the current market rate for new debt with similar risk; a reduction in the contractual principal and interest payments of the loan; or short-term interest-only payment terms.
The Company has allocated reserves for a portion of its TDRs to reflect the fair values of the underlying collateral or the present value of the concessionary terms granted to the customer.
19
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)
The following table presents the types of TDR loan modifications by class of loans as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
March 31, 2020
|
TDRs
Performing to Modified Terms
|
TDRs Not
Performing to Modified Terms
|
Total
TDRs
|
|||||||||
Residential real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Interest only payments
|
$
|
207
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
207
|
||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
||||||||||||
Interest only payments
|
868
|
----
|
868
|
|||||||||
Reduction of principal and interest payments
|
1,509
|
----
|
1,509
|
|||||||||
Maturity extension at lower stated rate than market rate
|
373
|
----
|
373
|
|||||||||
Credit extension at lower stated rate than market rate
|
391
|
----
|
391
|
|||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
||||||||||||
Credit extension at lower stated rate than market rate
|
394
|
----
|
394
|
|||||||||
Commercial and industrial:
|
||||||||||||
Interest only payments
|
3,984
|
----
|
3,984
|
|||||||||
Total TDRs
|
$
|
7,726
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
7,726
|
December 31, 2019
|
TDRs
Performing to Modified Terms
|
TDRs Not
Performing to Modified Terms
|
Total
TDRs
|
|||||||||
Residential real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Interest only payments
|
$
|
209
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
209
|
||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
||||||||||||
Interest only payments
|
882
|
----
|
882
|
|||||||||
Reduction of principal and interest payments
|
1,521
|
----
|
1,521
|
|||||||||
Maturity extension at lower stated rate than market rate
|
393
|
----
|
393
|
|||||||||
Credit extension at lower stated rate than market rate
|
393
|
----
|
393
|
|||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
||||||||||||
Credit extension at lower stated rate than market rate
|
395
|
----
|
395
|
|||||||||
Commercial and industrial:
|
||||||||||||
Interest only payments
|
4,574
|
----
|
4,574
|
|||||||||
Reduction of principal and interest payments
|
185
|
----
|
185
|
|||||||||
Total TDRs
|
$
|
8,552
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
8,552
|
At March 31, 2020, the balance in TDR loans decreased $826, or 9.7%, from year-end 2019. The Company’s specific allocations in reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs totaled
$450 at March 31, 2020, as compared to $227 in reserves at December 31, 2019. At March 31, 2020, the Company had $1,516 in commitments to lend additional amounts to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as TDRs, as compared to $941 at
December 31, 2019.
20
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)
There were no TDR loan modifications that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2020. The following table presents the pre- and post-modification balances of TDR loan modifications by class
of loans that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2019:
TDRs
Performing to Modified Terms
|
TDRs Not
Performing to Modified Terms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2019
|
Number of
Loans
|
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
|
Post-Modification Recorded Investment
|
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
|
Post-Modification Recorded Investment
|
|||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reduction of principal and interest payments
|
1
|
$
|
1,036
|
$
|
1,036
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
|||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reduction of principal and interest payments
|
1
|
199
|
199
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total TDRs
|
2
|
$
|
1,235
|
$
|
1,235
|
$
|
----
|
$
|
----
|
The TDRs described above had no impact on the allowance for loan losses and resulted in no charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2019.
The Company had no TDRs that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2020 or March 31, 2019 that experienced any payment defaults within twelve months following their loan modification. A
default is considered to have occurred once the TDR is past due 90 days or more or it has been placed on nonaccrual. TDR loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and
future payments are reasonably assured.
Under the terms of the CARE Act, as of March 31, 2020, the Company had modified 95 loans related to the COVID-19 pandemic with an aggregate loan balance of $15,934 that were not reported as TDRs in
the tables presented above. As of May 7, 2020, the volume of COVID-19 modifications had increased to 593 loans with an aggregate loan balance of $128,262.
Credit Quality Indicators:
The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, such as: current financial information, historical payment
experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. These risk categories are represented by a loan grading scale from 1 through 11. The Company analyzes loans individually with a higher credit risk
rating and groups these loans into categories called “criticized” and ”classified” assets. The Company considers its criticized assets to be loans that are graded 8 and its classified assets to be loans that are graded 9 through 11. The Company’s
risk categories are reviewed at least annually on loans that have aggregate borrowing amounts that meet or exceed $750.
The Company uses the following definitions for its criticized loan risk ratings:
Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention indicate considerable risk due to deterioration of
repayment (in the earliest stages) due to potential weak primary repayment source, or payment delinquency. These loans will be under constant supervision, are not classified and do not expose the institution to sufficient risks to warrant
classification. These deficiencies should be correctable within the normal course of business, although significant changes in company structure or policy may be necessary to correct the deficiencies. These loans are considered bankable
assets with no apparent loss of principal or interest envisioned. The perceived risk in continued lending is considered to have increased beyond the level where such loans would normally be granted. Credits that are defined as a TDR should
be graded no higher than special mention until they have been reported as performing over one year after restructuring.
|
21
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)
The Company uses the following definitions for its classified loan risk ratings:
Substandard. Loans classified as substandard represent very high risk, serious delinquency, nonaccrual, or unacceptable credit. Repayment through the
primary source of repayment is in jeopardy due to the existence of one or more well defined weaknesses and the collateral pledged may inadequately protect collection of the loans. Loss of principal is not likely if weaknesses are corrected,
although financial statements normally reveal significant weakness. Loans are still considered collectible, although loss of principal is more likely than with special mention loan grade 8 loans. Collateral liquidation is considered likely to
satisfy debt.
|
Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful display a high probability of loss, although the amount of actual loss at the time of classification is
undetermined. This classification should be temporary until such time that actual loss can be identified, or improvements made to reduce the seriousness of the classification. These loans exhibit all substandard characteristics with the
addition that weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable. This classification consists of loans where the possibility of loss is high after collateral liquidation based upon existing facts, market
conditions, and value. Loss is deferred until certain important and reasonable specific pending factors which may strengthen the credit can be more accurately determined. These factors may include proposed acquisitions, liquidation
procedures, capital injection, receipt of additional collateral, mergers, or refinancing plans. A doubtful classification for an entire credit should be avoided when collection of a specific portion appears highly probable with the adequately
secured portion graded substandard.
|
Loss. Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and are of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted.
This classification does not mean that the credit has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this asset yielding such a minimum value even though partial recovery may be
affected in the future. Amounts classified as loss should be promptly charged off.
|
Criticized and classified loans will mostly consist of commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loans. The Company considers its loans that do not meet the criteria for a criticized and
classified asset rating as pass rated loans, which will include loans graded from 1 (Prime) to 7 (Watch). All commercial loans are categorized into a risk category either at the time of origination or reevaluation date. As of March 31, 2020 and
December 31, 2019, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of commercial loans by class of loans was as follows:
March 31, 2020
|
Pass
|
Criticized
|
Classified
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
$
|
47,876
|
$
|
1,634
|
$
|
6,005
|
$
|
55,515
|
||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
129,848
|
6,309
|
984
|
137,141
|
||||||||||||
Construction
|
34,843
|
----
|
49
|
34,892
|
||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
92,468
|
4,071
|
6,031
|
102,570
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
305,035
|
$
|
12,014
|
$
|
13,069
|
$
|
330,118
|
December 31, 2019
|
Pass
|
Criticized
|
Classified
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate:
|
||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied
|
$
|
49,486
|
$
|
2,889
|
$
|
3,450
|
$
|
55,825
|
||||||||
Nonowner-occupied
|
123,847
|
----
|
7,551
|
131,398
|
||||||||||||
Construction
|
34,864
|
----
|
49
|
34,913
|
||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial
|
89,749
|
298
|
9,976
|
100,023
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
297,946
|
$
|
3,187
|
$
|
21,026
|
$
|
322,159
|
The Company also obtains the credit scores of its borrowers upon origination (if available by the credit bureau), but the scores are not updated. The Company focuses mostly on the performance and
repayment ability of the borrower as an indicator of credit risk and does not consider a borrower's credit score to be a significant influence in the determination of a loan's credit risk grading.
22
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)
For residential and consumer loan classes, the Company evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity. The following table
presents the recorded investment of residential and consumer loans by class of loans based on repayment activity as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
March 31, 2020
|
Consumer
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Automobile
|
Home Equity
|
Other
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Performing
|
$
|
61,536
|
$
|
21,535
|
$
|
53,162
|
$
|
301,652
|
$
|
437,885
|
||||||||||
Nonperforming
|
193
|
359
|
304
|
6,227
|
7,083
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
61,729
|
$
|
21,894
|
$
|
53,466
|
$
|
307,879
|
$
|
444,968
|
December 31, 2019
|
Consumer
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Automobile
|
Home Equity
|
Other
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Performing
|
$
|
63,470
|
$
|
22,490
|
$
|
53,224
|
$
|
303,879
|
$
|
443,063
|
||||||||||
Nonperforming
|
300
|
392
|
486
|
6,374
|
7,552
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
63,770
|
$
|
22,882
|
$
|
53,710
|
$
|
310,253
|
$
|
450,615
|
The Company, through its subsidiaries, originates residential, consumer, and commercial loans to customers located primarily in the southeastern areas of Ohio as well as the western counties of
West Virginia. Approximately 5.13% of total loans were unsecured at March 31, 2020, up from 5.00% at December 31, 2019.
NOTE 5 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments
to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees. The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit,
and financial guarantees written, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The contract amounts of these instruments are not included in the consolidated financial statements. At March 31, 2020, the contract amounts of these
instruments totaled approximately $78,563, compared to $75,178 at December 31, 2019. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for instruments recorded on the balance sheet. Since many of
these instruments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total contract amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
NOTE 6 - OTHER BORROWED FUNDS
Other borrowed funds at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are comprised of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Cincinnati and promissory notes.
FHLB Borrowings
|
Promissory Notes
|
Totals
|
||||||||||
March 31, 2020
|
$
|
28,375
|
$
|
4,084
|
$
|
32,459
|
||||||
December 31, 2019
|
$
|
29,758
|
$
|
4,233
|
$
|
33,991
|
Pursuant to collateral agreements with the FHLB, advances were secured by $299,428 in qualifying mortgage loans, $65,741 in commercial loans and $5,365 in FHLB stock at March 31,
2020. Fixed-rate FHLB advances of $28,375 mature through 2042 and have interest rates ranging from 1.53% to 3.31% and a year-to-date weighted average cost of 2.41%. There were no variable-rate FHLB borrowings at March 31, 2020.
At March 31, 2020, the Company had a cash management line of credit enabling it to borrow up to $80,000 from the FHLB. All cash management advances have an original maturity of 90 days. The line of credit must be
renewed on an annual basis. There was $80,000 available on this line of credit at March 31, 2020.
23
NOTE 6 - OTHER BORROWED FUNDS (Continued)
Based on the Company's current FHLB stock ownership, total assets and pledgeable loans, the Company had the ability to obtain borrowings from the FHLB up to a maximum of $202,356 at March 31, 2020. Of this maximum
borrowing capacity, the Company had $110,295 available to use as additional borrowings, of which $80,000 could be used for short-term, cash management advances, as mentioned above.
Promissory notes, issued primarily by Ohio Valley, are due at various dates through a final maturity date of May 17, 2021, and have fixed rates ranging from 2.00% to 4.09% and a year-to-date weighted average cost of
2.56% at March 31, 2020, as compared to 2.73% at December 31, 2019. There were eight promissory notes payable by Ohio Valley to related parties totaling $3,558 at March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019. Promissory notes payable to other banks
totaled $256 at March 31, 2020, as compared to $405 at December 31, 2019.
Letters of credit issued on the Bank's behalf by the FHLB to collateralize certain public unit deposits as required by law totaled $63,687 at March 31, 2020 and $56,500 at December 31, 2019.
Scheduled principal payments as of March 31, 2020:
FHLB
Borrowings
|
Promissory
Notes
|
Totals
|
||||||||||
2020
|
$
|
2,339
|
$
|
3,451
|
$
|
5,790
|
||||||
2021
|
3,000
|
633
|
3,633
|
|||||||||
2022
|
2,841
|
----
|
2,841
|
|||||||||
2023
|
2,705
|
----
|
2,705
|
|||||||||
2024
|
2,301
|
----
|
2,301
|
|||||||||
Thereafter
|
15,189
|
----
|
15,189
|
|||||||||
$
|
28,375
|
$
|
4,084
|
$
|
32,459
|
NOTE 7 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The reportable segments are determined by the products and services offered, primarily distinguished between banking and consumer finance. They are also distinguished by the level of information
provided to the chief operating decision maker, who uses such information to review performance of various components of the business, which are then aggregated if operating performance, products/services, and customers are similar. Loans,
investments, and deposits provide the majority of the net revenues from the banking operation, while loans provide the majority of the net revenues for the consumer finance segment. All Company segments are domestic.
Total revenues from the banking segment, which accounted for the majority of the Company's total revenues, totaled 90.8% and 90.6% of total
consolidated revenues for the quarters end March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The accounting policies used for the Company's reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Income taxes are allocated based on income
before tax expense.
Information for the Company’s reportable segments is as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
|
||||||||||||
Banking
|
Consumer
Finance
|
Total Company
|
||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$
|
9,471
|
$
|
533
|
$
|
10,004
|
||||||
Provision expense
|
3,845
|
1
|
3,846
|
|||||||||
Noninterest income
|
3,487
|
955
|
4,442
|
|||||||||
Noninterest expense
|
8,766
|
753
|
9,519
|
|||||||||
Tax expense
|
(75
|
)
|
154
|
79
|
||||||||
Net income
|
422
|
580
|
1,002
|
|||||||||
Assets
|
1,024,169
|
11,672
|
1,035,841
|
24
NOTE 7 – SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||
Banking
|
Consumer
Finance
|
Total Company
|
||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$
|
10,037
|
$
|
1,350
|
$
|
11,387
|
||||||
Provision expense
|
2,250
|
127
|
2,377
|
|||||||||
Noninterest income
|
1,819
|
27
|
1,846
|
|||||||||
Noninterest expense
|
8,820
|
748
|
9,568
|
|||||||||
Tax expense
|
(10
|
)
|
105
|
95
|
||||||||
Net income
|
796
|
397
|
1,193
|
|||||||||
Assets
|
1,033,203
|
11,670
|
1,044,873
|
NOTE 8 – LEASES
Substantially all of the Company’s operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities represent leases for branch buildings and office space to conduct business. Leases with an initial term of
12 months or less are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheet. The lease expense for these leases are recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Leases with initial terms in excess of 12 months are recorded as either operating or
financing leases on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company has no finance lease arrangements. Operating leases have remaining lease terms ranging from 1 month to 17.3 years, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to 15 years.
Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are valued based on the present value of future minimum lease payments, discounted with an incremental borrowing rate for the same term as the underlying lease. The
Company has one lease arrangement that contains variable lease payments that are adjusted periodically for an index. Upon adoption of the new lease guidance on January 1, 2019, an initial ROU asset of $1,280 was recognized as a non-cash
asset addition to the consolidated balance sheet.
Balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:
As of
March 31, 2020
|
As of
December 31, 2019
|
|||||||
Operating leases:
|
||||||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets
|
$
|
998
|
$
|
1,053
|
||||
Operating lease liabilities
|
998
|
1,053
|
The components of lease cost were as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2020
|
2019
|
|||||||
Operating lease cost
|
$
|
54
|
$
|
66
|
||||
Short-term lease expense
|
8
|
16
|
Future undiscounted lease payments for operating leases with initial terms of one year or more as of March 31, 2020 are as follows:
Operating Leases
|
||||
2020 (remaining)
|
$
|
123
|
||
2021
|
157
|
|||
2022
|
157
|
|||
2023
|
116
|
|||
2024
|
95
|
|||
Thereafter
|
546
|
|||
Total lease payments
|
1,194
|
|||
Less: Imputed Interest
|
(196
|
)
|
||
Total operating leases
|
$
|
998
|
Other information was as follows:
As of
March 31, 2020
|
As of
December 31, 2019
|
|||||||
Weighted-average remaining lease term for operating leases
|
10.3 years
|
10.6 years
|
||||||
Weighted-average discount rate for operating leases
|
2.77%
|
2.76%
|
25
ITEM 2. |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this report and other publicly available documents incorporated herein by reference constitute "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934 and as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are often, but not always, identified by the use of such words as “believes,” “anticipates,”
“expects,” “intends,” “plan,” “goal,” “seek,” “project,” “estimate,” “strategy,” “future,” “likely,” “may,” “should,” “will,” and similar expressions. Such statements involve various important assumptions, risks, uncertainties, and other factors,
many of which are beyond our control, particularly with regard to developments related to the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such
forward looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to: the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, operations, customers and capital
position; higher default rates on loans made to our customers related to COVID-19 and its impact on our customers’ operations and financial condition; the impact of COVID-19 on local, national and global economic conditions; unexpected changes in
interest rates or disruptions in the mortgage market related to COVID-19 or responses to the health crisis; the effects of various governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic; changes in political, economic or other factors, such as inflation rates, recessionary or expansive trends, taxes, the effects of implementation of legislation and the continuing economic uncertainty in various parts of the world;
competitive pressures; fluctuations in interest rates; the level of defaults and prepayment on loans made by the Company; unanticipated litigation, claims, or assessments; fluctuations in the cost of obtaining funds to make loans; and regulatory
changes. Additional detailed information concerning such factors is available in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including the disclosure under the heading “Item 1A.
Risk Factors” of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Part I of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward looking
statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation and disclaims any intention to republish revised or updated forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, unanticipated future events or
otherwise.
Financial Overview
The Company is primarily engaged in commercial and retail banking, offering a blend of commercial and consumer banking services within southeastern Ohio as well as western West Virginia. The banking services offered
by the Bank include the acceptance of deposits in checking, savings, time and money market accounts; the making and servicing of personal, commercial, floor plan and student loans; the making of construction and real estate loans; and credit card
services. The Bank also offers individual retirement accounts, safe deposit boxes, wire transfers and other standard banking products and services. In January 2020, the Bank began offering Tax Refund Advance Loans (“TALs”) to Loan Central tax
customers. A TAL represents a short-term loan offered by the Bank to tax preparation customers of Loan Central. Previously, Loan Central offered and originated tax refund anticipation loans that represented a large composition of its annual
earnings. However, new Ohio laws that became effective in April 2019 placed numerous restrictions on short-term and small loans extended by certain non-bank lenders in Ohio. As a result, Loan Central is no longer able to directly offer the service
to its tax preparation customers, but it is able to do so through the Bank. After Loan Central prepares a customer’s tax return, the customer is offered the opportunity to have immediate access to a portion of the anticipated tax refund by entering
into a TAL with the Bank. As part of the process, the tax customer completes a loan application and authorizes the expected tax refund to be deposited with the Bank once it is issued by the IRS. Once the Bank receives the tax refund, the refund is
used to repay the TAL and Loan Central’s tax preparation fees, then the remainder of the refund is remitted to Loan Central’s tax customer.
IMPACT of COVID-19: The primary markets served by the Company in southeastern Ohio and western West Virginia have been significantly impacted by the Coronavirus ("COVID-19") epidemic and has changed the way we live and work. In March 2020, the Governors for both the State of Ohio and West Virginia issued Executive Orders for all non-essential businesses to close and banned large scale
gatherings. These Governors issued orders for a slow, phased-in reopening of certain businesses beginning at the end of April. We remain committed to ensuring our associates, clients, and communities are receiving the support they need during these
challenging times. All of our banking centers, with the exception of our Holzer and Gallipolis Wal-Mart offices, remain operational through our drive-thru services and on an appointment-only basis in the lobbies. We have leveraged our digital banking
platform with our customers, and we have implemented company-wide remote working arrangements. These accommodations are likely to have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations during the duration of the epidemic, and, depending on how
quickly the businesses of our customers rebound after the emergency, could lead to an increase in nonperforming assets.
26
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") was signed into law. The CARES Act provides assistance to small businesses through the establishment of the
Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"). The PPP provides small businesses with funds to pay up to 8 weeks of payroll costs, including benefits. The funds are provided in the form of loans that will be fully forgiven when used for payroll costs, interest
on mortgages, rent, and utilities. The payments on these loans will be deferred for six months. Forgiveness of the PPP loans is based on the employer maintaining or quickly rehiring employees and maintaining salary levels. Most small businesses with
500 or fewer employees are eligible. Our teams are working diligently to support our clients who are experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19 through participation in the PPP, assistance with expedited deposits of CARES Act stimulus payments,
and loan modifications, as needed.
The length of the pandemic and the effectiveness of the extraordinary government-mandated measures that have been put into place to address it are unknown, but have already had, and are likely to
continue to have, a significantly negative impact to the U.S. labor market, consumer spending and business operations. Several actions have been taken by governmental authorities to address the economic impact of the pandemic, including the Federal
Reserve reducing the federal funds rate by 1.5% to a target range of 0 to 0.25% as well as taking additional actions, such as providing up to $2.3 trillion in loans to support the economy, and the passage of the CARES Act, which provides over $2
trillion in economic assistance for American workers, families and small businesses.
Net income totaled $1,002 during the first quarter of 2020, a decrease of $191, or 16.0%, compared to $1,193 during the first quarter of 2019. Earnings per share for the first quarter of 2020 finished at $.21 per
share, compared to $.25 per share during the first quarter of 2019. Earnings during the first quarter of 2020 were largely impacted by decreases in interest and fee loan revenue and higher provision expense being partially offset by higher
noninterest revenue and lower noninterest expenses.
The negative impact of lower net earnings during the first three months of 2020 also had a direct impact to the Company’s annualized net income to average asset ratio, or return on assets, which decreased to 0.40% at
March 31, 2020, compared to 0.47% at March 31, 2019. The Company’s net income to average equity ratio, or return on equity, also decreased to 3.14% at March 31, 2020, compared to 4.08% at March 31, 2019.
During the three months ended March 31, 2020, net interest income decreased $1,383, or 12.1%, from the same period in 2019. The decrease was mostly attributable to lower loan fees, net interest margin compression, and
a decrease in average earning assets. The decrease in loan fees was primarily the result of Loan Central not being able to offer tax refund anticipation loans in 2020 due to changes in Ohio lending regulations, as previously described above. As a
result, fees related to tax refund anticipation loans decreased $709 during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period last year. As discussed below, Loan Central’s tax preparation fee income from TAL offerings during the first quarter
of 2020 was recorded to noninterest income. For the first quarter ended March 31, 2020, the net interest margin finished at 4.34%, a decrease of 55 basis points from 4.89% during the first quarter of 2019. The decrease in quarterly margin was heavily
impacted by lower tax refund loan advance fees, which made up 30 basis points of the overall decrease. Margin compression was also impacted by decreasing market rates that contributed to lower asset yields during the first quarter of 2020. Since
the second half of 2019, the Federal Reserve Bank has lowered the federal funds rate by 225 basis points through March 31, 2020. Most recently, rates were reduced by 150 basis points in March 2020 due to concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on the
economy. Although the effects of lower market rates have reduced earning asset yields, the effects have not yet fully impacted the Company’s interest-bearing deposit costs. The Company’s interest rates on time deposits have repriced downward, which
will only have an impact of lowering interest expense when new time deposits are issued going forward. Furthermore, certain interest-bearing deposits were already at or near their interest rate floors, which also limited the Company’s ability to
reduce deposit costs during the first quarter of 2020. This lagging effect of deposit cost reduction combined with a more rate-sensitive earning asset portfolio further contributed to a lower net interest margin during the first quarter of 2020.
Also impacting net interest income was the Company’s average earning assets, which decreased $17,327, or 1.8%, during the first quarter of 2020 from the same period the prior year. Average asset decreases came mostly from the commercial and
installment loan segments of the loan portfolio.
27
During the three months ended March 31, 2020, the Company’s provision expense increased $1,469, or 61.8%, compared to the same period in 2019. The increase was largely impacted by the economic effects of the COVID-19
pandemic, which resulted in a higher general allocation of the allowance for loan losses during the first quarter of 2020. Based on declining economic conditions and increasing unemployment levels, management increased general reserves by $1,942 to
reflect higher anticipated losses due to the expected financial impact of COVID-19 on its customers. The Company benefited from lower classified assets and lower net charge-offs on loans with no specific allocation that helped to partially offset
the provision expense impact of COVID-19. The Company will continue to closely monitor COVID-19 and expects to make the appropriate adjustments within the allowance for loan losses in response to the pandemic as the situation evolves.
During the three months ended March 31, 2020, the Company finished with $4,442 in total noninterest income, as compared to $1,846 during the three months ended March 31, 2019. The improvement in noninterest revenue
was primarily attributable to proceeds of $2,000 received in a litigation settlement with a third-party. Noninterest revenue was also derived from a $615 increase in tax preparation fee income. This was the result of the Company changing its
business model in 2020 from assessing tax refund advance loan fees to now assessing tax preparation fees in response to a state law enacted in 2019. Higher losses from the sale of other real estate owned (“OREO”) during the first quarter of 2020
limited revenue growth, which reduced earnings by $101. All other remaining noninterest income activity during the first quarter of 2020 increased $82, or 4.4%, as compared to the same period from 2019. This income growth came mostly from bank
owned life insurance and annuity assets, as well as debit and credit card interchange income.
The Company benefited from lower noninterest expense during the first quarter of 2020, finishing at $9,519, a decrease of $49, or 0.5%, from the first quarter of 2019. The Company’s largest noninterest expense,
salaries and employee benefits, decreased $81, or 1.5%, from the first quarter of 2019. The decrease was primarily from the expense savings associated with a lower number of employees from the sale of two branches in December 2019 and the voluntary
severance program that was completed during the fourth quarter of 2019, which more than offset the expense increase associated with annual merit increases in 2020. Also contributing to lower overhead costs were professional fees, which decreased $74,
or 11.0%, from the first quarter of 2019. This expense savings was related to lower audit expense and litigation related legal fees. Foreclosed asset costs were also down $63, or 59.4%, from the first quarter of 2019, in relation to a lower volume of
foreclosures combined with recoveries of previously paid real estate taxes and insurance on certain foreclosed properties. Partially offsetting overhead expense reductions was an increase in data processing expense, which increased $64, or 12.0%,
from the first quarter of 2019, largely from credit card processing and website maintenance costs. Also, customer incentive costs that are included in other noninterest expense were up $53, or 18.4%, from the first quarter of 2019.
The Company’s provision for income taxes decreased $16 during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. This is largely due to the changes in taxable income affected by the factors mentioned
above.
At March 31, 2020, total assets were $1,035,841, compared to $1,013,272 at year-end 2019. Higher assets were impacted mostly by increases in cash and cash equivalents, which were up $14,315, or 27.3%, from year-end
2019. The increase was driven by excess funds from growth in retail deposits. Asset growth was also impacted by the Company’s available for sale investment securities portfolio, which increased $6,873 from year-end 2019. This was due mostly to new
purchases of Agency mortgage-backed securities during the first quarter of 2020. The Company’s loan portfolio increased $2,312, finishing at $775,086 at March 31, 2020, compared to $772,774 at year-end 2019. The commercial real estate and
commercial and industrial lending segments experienced a combined 2.5% increase from year-end 2019, which was partially offset by a combined 1.3% decrease in both the residential real estate and consumer loan portfolios. The Company’s premises and
equipment increased $1,749 from year-end 2019, impacted by the construction of its new Second and State Street facility in Gallipolis, Ohio. The facility officially opened in the first quarter of 2020 and consists mostly of executive offices and
areas for processing.
Total liabilities were $905,345 at March 31, 2020, up $20,252 from December 31, 2019. Contributing most to this increase were higher interest-bearing deposits, which increased $33,753 from year-end 2019, mostly from
seasonal tax collections contributing to higher public fund account balances, as well as a consumer shift into higher-costing money market accounts. Partially offsetting the growth in interest-bearing deposits were reduced borrowings of $1,532 from
the continued principal repayments of long-term advances with the FHLB. Liabilities were also impacted by lower noninterest-bearing deposits, which were down $9,345 from year-end 2019, related to lower business checking account balances.
At March 31, 2020, total shareholders' equity was $130,496, up $2,317 since December 31, 2019. Regulatory capital ratios of the Company remained higher than the "well capitalized" minimums.
28
Comparison of Financial Condition
at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019
at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019
The following discussion focuses, in more detail, on the consolidated financial condition of the Company at March 31, 2020 compared to December 31, 2019. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the interim
consolidated financial statements and the footnotes included in this Form 10‑Q.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
At March 31, 2020, cash and cash equivalents were $66,671, an increase of $14,315 from $52,356 at December 31, 2019. The increase in cash and cash equivalents came mostly from higher interest-bearing deposits on hand
with correspondent banks. Over 73% of cash and cash equivalents consist of the Company’s interest-bearing Federal Reserve Bank clearing account. The Company utilizes its interest-bearing Federal Reserve Bank clearing account to manage excess funds,
as well as to assist in funding earning asset growth. The interest rate paid on both the required and excess reserve balances of the Federal Reserve Bank account is based on the targeted federal funds rate established by the Federal Open Market
Committee. During the second half of 2019, the rate associated with the Company’s Federal Reserve Bank clearing account decreased 75 basis points to 1.75% as a result of the Federal Reserve’s action to decrease short-term market rates. The Federal
Reserve again reduced short-term rates by 150 basis points during March 2020 due to concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on the economy, resulting in a target federal funds rate range of 0% to 0.25%. Although interest-bearing deposits in the
Federal Reserve Bank are the Company's lowest-yielding interest-earning asset, the investment rate is higher than the rate the Company would have received from its investments in federal funds sold. Furthermore, Federal Reserve Bank balances are 100%
secured.
The Company’s focus will be to invest excess funds in longer-term, higher-yielding assets, primarily loans, when the opportunities arise. As liquidity levels vary continuously based on consumer activities, amounts of
cash and cash equivalents can vary widely at any given point in time. As previously mentioned, the Bank settled the lawsuit filed against a third-party tax refund provider for breach of contract in March 2020. In addition, the Bank entered into a
new agreement with the third-party to process future electronic refund checks and deposits presented for payment on behalf of taxpayers through accounts containing taxpayer refunds. The new agreement provides that the Bank will process refunds for
five tax seasons, beginning with the 2021 tax season and going through the 2025 tax season. As a result, the Bank anticipates this new tax agreement will materially impact its liquidity levels during the term of the agreement beginning in 2021.
Certificates of deposit
At March 31, 2020, the Company had $2,360 in certificates of deposit owned by the Captive, unchanged from year-end 2019. The deposits on hand at March 31, 2020 consist of ten certificates with remaining maturity terms
ranging from less than 3 months up to 30 months.
Securities
The balance of total securities increased $6,648, or 5.7%, compared to year-end 2019. The Company’s investment securities portfolio is made up mostly of U.S. Government agency (“Agency”)
mortgage-backed securities, which increased $7,593, or 8.6%, from year-end 2019 and represented 77.6% of total investments at March 31, 2020. During the first three months of 2020, the Company invested $10,287 in new Agency mortgage-backed
securities, while receiving principal repayments of $5,352. The monthly repayment of principal has been the primary advantage of Agency mortgage-backed securities as compared to other types of investment securities, which deliver proceeds upon
maturity or call date.
In addition, decreasing market rates during 2020 led to a $2,937 decrease in the net unrealized loss position associated with the Company’s available for sale securities, which increased the fair
value of securities at March 31, 2020. The fair value of an investment security moves inversely to interest rates, so as rates decreased, the unrealized loss in the portfolio was reduced. These changes in rates are typical and do not impact earnings
of the Company as long as the securities are held to full maturity.
29
Loans
The loan portfolio represents the Company’s largest asset category and is its most significant source of interest income. Gross loan balances totaled $775,086 at March 31, 2020, representing an increase of $2,312, or
0.3%, as compared to $772,774 at December 31, 2019. Positive loan growth came mostly from the commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loan portfolios, partially offset by balance decreases in the residential real estate and consumer
loan portfolios.
The majority of the Company’s increase in loans from year-end 2019 came from the commercial real estate loan portfolio, which increased $5,412, or 2.4%, from year-end 2019. The commercial real estate segment comprised
the largest portion of the Company’s total commercial loan portfolio at March 31, 2020 at 68.9%. Leading the growth in commercial real estate were increases in nonowner-occupied loan originations, with balances up $5,743, or 4.4%, from year-end
2019. Further growth in loans came from commercial and industrial loans, which increased $2,547, or 2.5%, from year-end 2019. Commercial and industrial loans consist of loans to corporate borrowers primarily in small to mid-sized industrial and
commercial companies that include service, retail and wholesale merchants. Collateral securing these loans includes equipment, inventory, and stock. While management believes lending opportunities exist in the Company’s markets, future commercial
lending activities will depend upon economic and related conditions, such as general demand for loans in the Company’s primary markets, interest rates offered by the Company, the effects of competitive pressure and normal underwriting
considerations. Management will continue to place emphasis on its commercial lending, which generally yields a higher return on investment as compared to other types of loans.
Partially offsetting the increases in both commercial loan portfolios were lower residential real estate loans, which decreased $2,374, or 0.8%, from year-end 2019. The residential real estate loan segment comprises
the largest portion of the Company’s overall loan portfolio at 39.7% and consists primarily of one- to four-family residential mortgages and carries many of the same customer and industry risks as the commercial loan portfolio. The decrease in
residential real estate loans was largely the result of the Bank's warehouse lending volume. Warehouse lending consists of a line of credit provided by the Bank to another mortgage lender that makes loans for the
purchase of one- to four-family residential real estate properties. The mortgage lender eventually sells the loans and repays the Bank. Furthermore, the Company continues to experience continued payoffs and maturities of both long-term
fixed-rate mortgages and short-term adjustable-rate mortgages from year-end 2019 that have contributed to the decline in total residential real estate loans.
Also decreasing were consumer loan balances, which were down $3,273, or 2.3%, from year-end 2019, finishing at $137,089. This change was primarily impacted by a decline in automobile loan balances from year-end 2019.
Automobile loans represent the Company’s largest consumer loan segment at 45.0% of total consumer loans. The Company will continue to attempt to increase its auto lending segment while maintaining strict loan underwriting processes to limit future
loss exposure.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Company established an $8,729 allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2020, which represents an increase from the $6,272 allowance at year-end 2019. The allowance was impacted by an increase of $2,410 in general
allocations from year-end 2019. As part of the Company’s quarterly analysis of the allowance for loan losses, management will review various factors that directly impact the general allocation needs of the allowance, which include: historical loan
losses, loan delinquency levels, local economic conditions and unemployment rates, criticized/classified asset coverage levels and loan loss recoveries. During the first quarter of 2020, the Company added a new risk factor to the evaluation of the
allowance for loan losses pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic. While the Company had not yet experienced any charge-offs related to COVID-19 at March 31, 2020, management determined the changes in economic conditions
resulting from increases in unemployment would produce higher anticipated losses as a result of COVID-19. Given that the economic scenarios had deteriorated significantly since the pandemic was declared in early March, it was determined the credit
risk in the loan portfolio had increased, resulting in the need for an additional reserve for credit loss. As a result, the general reserve allocation related to COVID-19 totaled $1,942, which had a corresponding impact to provision expense during
the first quarter of 2020.
Excluding the risk factors from COVID-19, the Company also experienced increases in general allocations from its historical loan loss factor, which grew from 0.23% at year-end 2019 to 0.28% at March 31, 2020.
Increases also came from higher unemployment rates within the Company’s market areas, as well as lower annualized loan recoveries at March 31, 2020 compared to year-end 2019. The impact from these risk factors were partially offset by a lower
classified asset risk factor from year-end 2019, impacted by various commercial loan upgrades as a result of improvements in the financial performance of certain borrowers’ ability to repay their loans. This contributed to lower classified assets
from year-end 2019, particularly within the commercial nonowner-occupied and commercial and industrial loan segments. Furthermore, the Company’s delinquency levels remained relatively stable from year-end 2019, with nonperforming loans to total loans
of 1.31% at March 31, 2020 compared to 1.30% at December 31, 2019, and lower nonperforming assets to total assets of 1.01% at March 31, 2020 compared to 1.04% at year-end 2019.
30
The Company also experienced an increase in specific allocations from $807 at year-end 2019 to $854 at March 31, 2020. Specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses identify loan impairment by measuring fair
value of the underlying collateral and the present value of estimated future cash flows. The change in specific reserves from year-end 2019 to March 31, 2020 was related to one commercial and industrial loan borrower.
The Company’s allowance for loan losses to total loans ratio finished at 1.13% at March 31, 2020 and 0.81% at year-end 2019. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2020 was adequate and
reflected probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. There can be no assurance, however, that adjustments to the allowance for loan losses will not be required in the future. Changes in the circumstances of particular borrowers, as well as
adverse developments in the economy, particularly with the COVID-19 pandemic, are factors that could change, and cause further increases in the required allowance for loan losses and require additional provision expense. Asset quality will continue
to remain a key focus, as management continues to stress not just loan growth, but quality in loan underwriting as well.
Deposits
Deposits continue to be the most significant source of funds used by the Company to meet obligations for depositor withdrawals, to fund the borrowing needs of loan customers, and to fund ongoing
operations. Total deposits at March 31, 2020 increased $24,408, or 3.0%, from year-end 2019. This change in deposits came primarily from interest-bearing deposit balances, which were up by $33,753, or 5.6%, from year-end 2019, while
noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $9,345, or 4.2%, from year-end 2019.
The increase in interest-bearing deposits came mostly from higher interest-bearing NOW account balances from year-end 2019, which increased $20,476, or 12.9%. This increase was largely driven by
higher municipal NOW product balances, particularly within the Gallia County, Ohio and Mason County, WV market areas. Time deposit balances also increased $6,155, or 2.9%, from year-end 2019, as a result of consumer preference for 1-2 year
certificates of deposit (“CDs”). Money market balances also grew from year-end 2019 by $4,478, or 3.4%, primarily from a shift in consumer preference to more competitive, higher-costing deposit accounts. The remaining interest-bearing deposits were
up $2,644 from year-end 2019, primarily from higher statement savings account balances.
The decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits came mostly from the Company’s business checking account balances from year-end 2019.
While facing increased competition for deposits in its market areas, the Company will continue to emphasize growth and retention in its core deposit relationships during the remainder of 2020,
reflecting the Company’s efforts to reduce its reliance on higher cost funding and improve net interest income.
Other Borrowed Funds
Other borrowed funds were $32,459 at March 31, 2020, a decrease of $1,532, or 4.5%, from year-end 2019. The decrease was related primarily to the principal repayments applied to
various FHLB advances during the first three months of 2020. While deposits continue to be the primary source of funding for growth in earning assets, management will continue to utilize FHLB advances and promissory notes to help manage interest rate
sensitivity and liquidity.
Shareholders’ Equity
Total shareholders' equity at March 31, 2020 increased $2,317, or 1.8%, to finish at $130,496, as compared to $128,179 at December 31, 2019. Net unrealized gains on available for sale securities
increased $2,320 from year-end 2019, as market rate decreases continued during the first three months of 2020 causing an increase in the fair value of the Company’s investment portfolio.
31
Comparison of Results of Operations
For the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2020 and 2019
The following discussion focuses, in more detail, on the consolidated results of operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to the same periods in 2019. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with the interim consolidated financial statements and the footnotes included in this Form 10‑Q.
Net Interest Income
The most significant portion of the Company's revenue, net interest income, results from properly managing the spread between interest income on earning assets and interest expense incurred on interest-bearing
liabilities. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, net interest income decreased $1,383, or 12.1%, as compared to the same period in 2019. Net interest income was negatively impacted by lower loan fees, market rate decreases causing net
interest margin compression, and a decrease in average earning assets.
Total interest and fee income recognized on the Company’s earning assets decreased $1,273, or 9.7%, during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The quarterly decrease was impacted by
interest and fees on loans, which decreased $1,039, or 8.7%, as compared to the same period in 2019. As previously mentioned, beginning in 2020, the Company changed its business model for Loan Central’s assessment of fees from assessing tax refund
advance loan fees to now assessing tax preparation fees. This fundamental change in the fee structure was necessary to comply with new Ohio lending regulations. As a result, tax refund advance loan fees for the first quarter of 2020 decreased $709
from the same period last year. Furthermore, average loans for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2020 decreased $11,040, or 1.4%, while the interest rate yield on loans decreased from 6.29% to 5.78% during the
same periods. The decrease in average quarterly loans came mostly from the commercial and installment loan segments of the loan portfolio. Loan yields were impacted by interest rate reductions from the Federal Reserve Bank. In March 2020, the
Federal Reserve Bank took aggressive action by lowering the federal funds rate by 150 basis points to a target range of 0 to 0.25% due to concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on the economy. Prior to this, the Federal Reserve Bank had lowered the
federal funds rate by 75 basis points during the second half of 2019. This trend of decreasing market rates led to lower yields on the Company’s loan portfolio and lower loan interest revenue.
During the three months ended March 31, 2020, interest income from interest-bearing deposits with banks decreased $157, or 49.2%, when compared to the same period in 2019. These changes in interest revenue come
primarily from the Company’s interest-bearing Federal Reserve Bank clearing account. The quarterly decrease in interest income was due to decreases in both the interest rate and average balance of this interest-bearing clearing account. Average
Federal Reserve Bank deposit balances were down $5,467, or 10.9%, during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The interest rate tied to the Federal Reserve Bank clearing account was 0.25% at March 31, 2020 compared to
2.25% at March 31, 2019.
Total interest expense incurred on the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities increased $110, or 6.6%, during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The upward movement in interest expense
was primarily from interest expense on deposits, particularly time deposits and money market accounts. The Company’s average interest-bearing deposits were relatively stable at $605,828 and $605,474 during the first quarter of 2020 and 2019,
respectively. In December 2019, the Company sold its Mount Sterling and New Holland branches that were previously acquired as part of the merger with Milton Bancorp, Inc. in 2016. Excluding the impact of the branch sale, average interest-bearing
deposits would show an increase of $18,559, or 3.2%, during the first quarter of 2020 over the same period in 2019. This growth came mostly from money market, NOW and time deposit balances. As previously discussed, short-term market rates have
significantly decreased since the second half of 2019 causing asset yields to decrease. However, there is a lagging effect to the impact that decreasing market rates are having on reducing deposit expense. As CD rates have repriced downward, the
Company will benefit in lower interest expense only to the extent that new CDs at lower rates are issued. The consumer demand for CDs has eased since interest rates began to decrease in the second half of 2019, which has limited opportunities for
lower interest expense. Furthermore, other interest-bearing deposits were already at or near their interest rate floors, which has also limited the Company’s ability to reduce deposit costs during the first quarter of 2020. The Company also continues
to experience a composition shift to a higher-costing money market account that has generated more interest expense. The account offers a more competitive rate and is at a higher interest rate than other money market account products. The Company’s
use of higher-costing time deposits combined with the composition shift to higher-costing money market deposits caused the Company’s total weighted average costs on interest-bearing deposits to increase by 10 basis points from 0.90% at March 31, 2019
to 1.00% at March 31, 2020. The higher average costs associated with time deposits and the new competitive money market account contributed to over 86% of the interest expense increase during the first three months of 2020, as compared to the same
period in 2019.
32
The Company’s net interest margin is defined as fully tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets. During 2020, the Company’s first quarter net interest margin finished at 4.34%,
compared to 2019’s first quarter net interest margin of 4.89%. The decrease in margin was largely impacted by the significant decrease in tax refund anticipation loan fees, which lowered the margin by 30 basis points in the first quarter of 2020.
Margin compression was also influenced by decreasing market rates that contributed to lower earning asset yields during the first quarter of 2020. Interest rates were reduced in the first quarter of 2020 primarily by the growing concern of the
COVID-19 pandemic that has had a significant impact to a weakening economy. Furthermore, the Company’s deposit costs remain higher in relation to an increased composition of higher-costing deposits, such as time deposits and money market accounts.
This, along with the lagging effect of deposit costs benefiting from decreasing market rates, has further contributed to a lower margin during the first quarter of 2020. The Company’s primary focus is to invest its funds into higher yielding assets,
particularly loans, as opportunities arise. However, if loan balances do not continue to expand and remain a larger component of overall earning assets, the Company will face pressure within its net interest income and margin improvement.
Provision for Loan Losses
For the three months ended March 31, 2020, the Company’s provision expense increased $1,469, or 61.8%, over the same period in 2019. As previously discussed, the Company’s general reserves during the first quarter of
2020 were significantly impacted by a $1,942 allocation of the allowance for loan losses as a result of the expected financial impact of COVID-19 on its customers. The allocation resulted in a corresponding entry to provision expense. The impact
from this new risk factor was partially offset by the release of general reserves associated with lower classified assets. Furthermore, net charge-offs on loans containing no specific allocation were down from the prior year, which helped to reduce
provision expense during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019.
Future provisions to the allowance for loan losses will continue to be based on management’s quarterly in-depth evaluation that is discussed in further detail under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies - Allowance
for Loan Losses” within this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2020 totaled $4,442, as compared to $1,846 during the three months ended March 31, 2019. The key contributor to the quarterly improvement in noninterest revenue
was from proceeds received in a litigation settlement with a third-party. During the first quarter of 2020, the Bank entered into a settlement agreement related to the previously disclosed litigation the Bank had filed against a third-party tax
software product provider for breach of contract. Under the settlement agreement, the third-party paid a $2,000 settlement payment to the Bank, which was recorded as noninterest income.
Further growth in noninterest revenue came from tax preparation fee income. As previously discussed, the Company changed its business model in 2020 for assessing fees related to tax refund advance loans. By charging
for the tax preparation services, the Company recorded $615 in tax preparation fee income for the first quarter of 2020.
Limiting noninterest revenue growth during the first quarter of 2020 were higher losses from the sale of OREO, which reduced noninterest earnings by $101. This was primarily from an adjustment to the fair value of one
commercial OREO property during the first quarter of 2020.
The remaining noninterest income categories increased $82, or 4.4%, during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. This income growth came mostly from
higher bank owned life insurance and annuity asset balances, as well as interchange income from growth in debit and credit card transactions. The Company has been successful in promoting the use of both debit and credit
cards by offering incentives that permit their users to redeem accumulated points for merchandise, as well as cash incentives.
33
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense during the first quarter of 2020 decreased $49, or 0.5%, as compared to the same period in 2019. The Company’s largest noninterest expense, salaries and employee benefits, decreased $81, or 1.5%,
during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The decrease was primarily from the expense savings associated with a lower number of employees from the sale of two branches in December 2019 and the voluntary severance
program that was completed during the fourth quarter of 2019. The Bank’s average full-time equivalent employee base at March 31, 2020 was 244 employees, down from an average full-time equivalent employee base of 265 employees at March 31, 2019. The
impact of a lower employee base more than offset the expense increase associated with annual merit increases in the first quarter of 2020.
Further impacting lower overhead costs were professional fees, which decreased $74, or 11.0%, during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. These decreases include lower litigation costs
associated with the Bank’s lawsuit against the third-party tax software product provider. As previously discussed, a settlement was reached with the third-party during the first quarter of 2020, which contributed to lower legal costs. Additionally,
the Company incurred lower audit-related expenses during the first quarter of 2020. This was related to costs from 2019 associated with the “expected loss” allowance model that the Company was prepared to adopt in 2020. In the fourth quarter of
2019, it was announced this required accounting guidance would be delayed until 2023.
The Company also benefited from lower foreclosed asset costs, which decreased $63, or 59.4%, during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. In addition to lower foreclosure costs, the
Company also recovered $23 in delinquent insurance and real estate taxes associated with one commercial real estate borrower during the first quarter of 2020.
Partially offsetting decreases in overhead costs were higher data processing expenses, which increased $64, or 12.0%, during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. Data processing expense
in 2020 was largely impacted by the transaction volume associated with credit cards. The Company also incurred website maintenance costs in 2020 to improve the quality of its internet-based technology.
The remaining noninterest expense categories increased $105, or 3.9%, during the first quarter of 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. These increases were impacted mostly from incentive costs associated with
promoting the use of demand deposit products, as well as the use of both debit and credit cards with merchandise and cash incentives.
Efficiency
The Company’s efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense as a percentage of fully tax-equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income. The effects from provision expense are excluded from
the efficiency ratio. Management continues to place emphasis on managing its balance sheet mix and interest rate sensitivity as well as developing more innovative ways to generate noninterest revenue. Comparing the first quarters of 2020 and 2019,
the Company’s average loans decreased 1.4%, while loan yields decreased by 51 basis points. This, combined with the $709 decrease in tax refund advance loan fees, caused the Company’s total net interest income to decrease by 12.1%. However, this was
completely offset by a $2,596 increase in noninterest revenue, which was impacted by $2,000 in income from a litigation settlement and $615 in tax preparation fee income. Furthermore, the severance package offering and the sale of two branch offices
in December 2019 contributed to lower overhead expense in 2020. As a result, the Company’s efficiency number decreased (improved) to 65.4% during the quarterly period ended March 31, 2020, as compared to 71.7% during the same period in 2019.
Provision for income taxes
The Company’s income tax provision decreased $16, or 16.8%, during the three months ended March 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The change in tax expense corresponded directly to the
change in associated taxable income during 2020 and 2019.
Capital Resources
Federal regulators have classified and defined capital into the following components: (1) tier 1 capital, which includes tangible shareholders’ equity for common stock, qualifying preferred stock and
certain qualifying hybrid instruments, and (2) tier 2 capital, which includes a portion of the allowance for loan losses, certain qualifying long-term debt, preferred stock and hybrid instruments which do not qualify as tier 1 capital.
34
In September 2019, consistent with Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, the federal banking agencies issued a final rule providing simplified capital
requirements for certain community banking organizations (banks and holding companies). Under the rule, a qualifying community banking organization (“QCBO”) is eligible to opt into the Community Bank Leverage Ratio (“CBLR”) framework in lieu of the
Basel III capital requirements if it has less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, limited amounts of certain trading assets and liabilities, limited amounts of off-balance sheet exposure and a leverage ratio greater than 9.0%. The new rule
took effect January 1, 2020, and QCBOs were allowed to opt into the new CBLR framework in their call report for the first quarter of 2020.
A QCBO opting into the CBLR framework must maintain a CBLR of 9.0%, subject to a two quarter grace period to come back into compliance, provided that the QCBO maintains a leverage ratio of more than
8.0% during the grace period. A QCBO failing to satisfy these requirements must comply with the existing Basel III capital requirements as implemented by the banking regulators in July 2013.
The numerator of the CBLR is Tier 1 capital, as calculated under present rules. The denominator of the CBLR is the QCBO’s average assets, calculated in accordance with the QCBO’s Call Report
instructions and less assets deducted from Tier 1 capital.
The Bank has opted into the CBLR, and will therefore not be required to comply with the Basel III capital requirements. As of March 31, 2020, the Bank’s CBLR was 11.65%, and the Company’s CBLR was
12.82%.
Pursuant to the CARES Act, the federal banking regulators in April, 2020 issued interim final rules to set the CBLR at 8% beginning in the second quarter of 2020 through the end of 2020. Beginning in
2021, the CBLR will increase to 8.5% for the calendar year. Community banks will have until January 1, 2022 before the CBLR requirement will return to 9%.
Cash dividends paid by the Company were $1,005 during the first three months of 2020. The year-to-date dividends paid totaled $0.21 per share.
Liquidity
Liquidity relates to the Company's ability to meet the cash demands and credit needs of its customers and is provided by the ability to readily convert assets to cash and raise funds in the marketplace. Total cash and
cash equivalents, held to maturity securities maturing within one year and available for sale securities, totaling $179,501, represented 17.3% of total assets at March 31, 2020. In addition, the FHLB offers advances to the Bank, which further
enhances the Bank's ability to meet liquidity demands. At March 31, 2020, the Bank could borrow an additional $110,295 from the FHLB, of which $80,000 could be used for short-term, cash management advances. Furthermore, the Bank has established a
borrowing line with the Federal Reserve. At March 31, 2020, this line had total availability of $48,136. Lastly, the Bank also has the ability to purchase federal funds from a correspondent bank.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As discussed in Note 5 – Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk, the Company engages in certain off-balance sheet credit-related activities, including commitments to extend credit and standby
letters of credit, which could require the Company to make cash payments in the event that specified future events occur. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established
in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. While
these commitments are necessary to meet the financing needs of the Company’s customers, many of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total amount of commitments does not necessarily represent future cash
requirements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The most significant accounting policies followed by the Company are presented in Note A to the financial statements in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders. These policies,
along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Management views critical
accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on
the financial statements. Management currently views the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to be a critical accounting policy.
35
Allowance for loan losses
The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance
is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations
and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and
events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans generally consist of loans with balances of $200 or more on nonaccrual status or nonperforming
in nature. Loans for which the terms have been modified, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered TDRs and classified as impaired.
Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that
experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the
circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length and reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
Commercial and commercial real estate loans are individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present
value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and most residential real estate, are
collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosure. TDRs are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a TDR is
considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For TDRs that subsequently default, the Company determines the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance
for loan losses.
The general component covers non-impaired loans and impaired loans that are not individually reviewed for impairment and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The
historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Company over the most recent 3 years for the consumer and real estate portfolio segment and 5 years for the commercial portfolio
segment. The total loan portfolio’s actual loss experience is supplemented with other economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These economic factors include consideration of the following: levels of and trends in
delinquencies and impaired loans; levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedures, and
practices; experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of changes in credit concentrations. The following portfolio segments have
been identified: Commercial Real Estate, Commercial and Industrial, Residential Real Estate, and Consumer.
Commercial and industrial loans consist of borrowings for commercial purposes by individuals, corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, and other business enterprises. Commercial and industrial
loans are generally secured by business assets such as equipment, accounts receivable, inventory, or any other asset excluding real estate and generally made to finance capital expenditures or operations. The Company’s risk exposure is related to
deterioration in the value of collateral securing the loan should foreclosure become necessary. Generally, business assets used or produced in operations do not maintain their value upon foreclosure, which may require the Company to write down the
value significantly to sell.
36
Commercial real estate consists of nonfarm, nonresidential loans secured by owner-occupied and nonowner-occupied commercial real estate as well as commercial construction loans. An owner-occupied loan
relates to a borrower purchased building or space for which the repayment of principal is dependent upon cash flows from the ongoing business operations conducted by the party, or an affiliate of the party, who owns the property. Owner-occupied loans
that are dependent on cash flows from operations can be adversely affected by current market conditions for their product or service. A nonowner-occupied loan is a property loan for which the repayment of principal is dependent upon rental income
associated with the property or the subsequent sale of the property. Nonowner-occupied loans that are dependent upon rental income are primarily impacted by local economic conditions which dictate occupancy rates and the amount of rent charged.
Commercial construction loans consist of borrowings to purchase and develop raw land into one- to four-family residential properties. Construction loans are extended to individuals as well as corporations for the construction of an individual or
multiple properties and are secured by raw land and the subsequent improvements. Repayment of the loans to real estate developers is dependent upon the sale of properties to third parties in a timely fashion upon completion. Should there be delays in
construction or a downturn in the market for those properties, there may be significant erosion in value which may be absorbed by the Company.
Residential real estate loans consist of loans to individuals for the purchase of one- to four-family primary residences with repayment primarily through wage or other income sources of the individual
borrower. The Company’s loss exposure to these loans is dependent on local market conditions for residential properties as loan amounts are determined, in part, by the fair value of the property at origination.
Consumer loans are comprised of loans to individuals secured by automobiles, open-end home equity loans and other loans to individuals for household, family, and other personal expenditures, both
secured and unsecured. These loans typically have maturities of 6 years or less with repayment dependent on individual wages and income. The risk of loss on consumer loans is elevated as the collateral securing these loans, if any, rapidly depreciate
in value or may be worthless and/or difficult to locate if repossession is necessary. During the last several years, one of the most significant portions of the Company’s net loan charge-offs have been from consumer loans. Nevertheless, the Company
has allocated the highest percentage of its allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans to the other identified loan portfolio segments due to the larger dollar balances and inherent risk associated with such portfolios.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company maintains a diversified credit portfolio, with residential real estate loans currently comprising the most significant portion. Credit risk is primarily subject to loans made to businesses
and individuals in southeastern Ohio and western West Virginia. Management believes this risk to be general in nature, as there are no material concentrations of loans to any industry or consumer group. To the extent possible, the Company diversifies
its loan portfolio to limit credit risk by avoiding industry concentrations.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer) and the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer) of Ohio
Valley, Ohio Valley’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of Ohio Valley’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2020.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Ohio Valley in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to Ohio Valley’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, Ohio Valley’s Chief Executive
Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that Ohio Valley’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2020 due to a material weakness described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (our “2019 Form
10-K”).
37
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Based on the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, as described in our 2019 Form 10-K, management concluded that Ohio Valley did not maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 due to the effectiveness of the Company’s control over appropriate monitoring of loans through the subsequent events period, including not timely evaluating information
received after the fiscal year end that affected the appropriateness of loan grades and impairment classification used in the allowance for loan losses estimate.. A material weakness is a deficiency in internal control over financial reporting such
that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement would not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. With regard to the material weakness, our remediation efforts began during the quarter ended March 31, 2020. We are changing
how certain controls are designed, performed and documented. Our credit administration department, in conjunction with an expanded group of the management team, have heightened the monitoring of troubled credits during the subsequent event period up
and until the report filing date.This included training around timely identifying and communicating subsequent events and increasing the management staff involved with monitoring the control around subsequent events that may impact the assessment of
loan grades or impairment valuations.We must now demonstrate the effectiveness of these changes with an appropriate amount of consistency and for a sufficient period of time to conclude that the control is functioning properly. Other than these
changes, there were no significant changes during the quarter ended March 31, 2020 in Ohio Valley’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Ohio Valley’s internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Ohio Valley is not currently subject to any material legal proceedings.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1.A. “Risk Factors” in Ohio Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2019, in the first quarter of 2020 we identified the following additional risk factor:
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted our business and financial results, and the ultimate impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted,
including the scope and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities in response to the pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic is creating extensive disruptions to the global economy and to the lives of individuals throughout the world. Governments, businesses and the public are taking unprecedented
actions to contain the spread of COVID-19 and to mitigate its effects, including quarantines, travel bans, shelter-in-place orders, closures of businesses and schools, fiscal stimulus and legislation designed to deliver monetary aid and other relief.
While the scope, duration and full effects of the pandemic are rapidly evolving and not fully known, the pandemic and related efforts to contain it have disrupted global economic activity, adversely affected the functioning of financial markets,
impacted interest rates, increased economic and market uncertainty and disrupted trade and supply chains. If these effects continue for a prolonged period or result in sustained economic stress or recession, many of the risk factors identified in our
Form 10-K could be significantly impacted and such effects could have a material adverse impact on us in a number of ways related to credit, collateral, capital, customer demand, funding, liquidity, operations, interest rate risk, human capital and
self-insurance, as described in more detail below.
Credit Risk: Our risks of timely loan repayment and the value of collateral supporting the loans are affected by the strength of our borrowers’ businesses. Concern about the spread of COVID-19
has caused and is likely to continue to cause business shutdowns, limitations on commercial activity and financial transactions, labor shortages, supply chain interruptions, increased unemployment and commercial property vacancy rates, reduced
profitability and ability for property owners to make mortgage payments and overall economic and financial market instability, all of which may cause our customers to be unable to make scheduled loan payments. Many customers have requested and have
been granted hardship relief in the form of payment deferrals and modifications as well as loans through the CARES Act. If customers are unable to repay their loans in a timely manner following hardship relief, it could result in a deterioration of
asset quality, an increase in delinquency, reversal of accrued interest income, and an increase in credit losses. If the effects of COVID-19 result in widespread and sustained repayment shortfalls on loans in our portfolio, we could incur significant
delinquencies, foreclosures and credit losses, particularly if the available collateral is insufficient to cover our exposure. Significant loan losses could adversely impact the Bank’s capital ratios, which could prevent the Bank from paying
dividends to us, which dividends – along with cash on hand – are used by us to service our debt obligations. The future effects of COVID-19 on economic activity could negatively affect the collateral values associated with our existing loans, our
ability to liquidate the real estate collateral securing our residential and commercial real estate loans, our ability to maintain loan origination volume and to obtain additional financing, the future demand for or profitability of our lending and
services and the financial condition and credit risk of our customers. Further, in the event of delinquencies, regulatory changes and policies designed to protect borrowers may slow or prevent us from making our business decisions or may result in a
delay in our taking certain remediation actions, such as foreclosure. In addition, we have unfunded commitments to extend credit to customers. During a challenging economic environment like now, our customers are more dependent on our credit
commitments and increased borrowings under these commitments could adversely impact our liquidity.
38
Strategic Risk: Our success may be affected by a variety of external factors that may affect the price or marketability of our products and services, changes in interest rates or sentiment of our
deposit customers that may increase our funding costs, reduced demand for our financial products due to economic conditions and the various response of governmental and nongovernmental authorities. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly increased
economic and demand uncertainty and has led to disruption and volatility in the global capital markets. Furthermore, many of the governmental actions have been directed toward curtailing household and business activity to contain COVID-19. In the
Company’s core market areas, the local governments have acted to temporarily close or restrict the operations of most businesses. The future effects of COVID-19 on economic activity could negatively affect the future banking products we provide,
including a decline in the origination of loans.
Operational Risk: Current and future restrictions on how we operate our bank offices and operational departments could limit our ability to meet customer service expectations and have a material
adverse effect on our operations. Key employees could become sick from COVID-19. We rely on business processes and bank office activity that largely depend on people and technology, including access to information technology systems as well as
information, applications, payment systems and other services provided by third parties. In response to COVID-19, we have modified our business practices with a portion of our employees working remotely from their homes to have our operations
uninterrupted as much as possible. Further, technology in employees’ homes may not be as robust as in our offices and could cause the networks, information systems, applications and other tools available to employees to be more limited or less
reliable than in our offices. The continuation of these work-from-home measures also introduces additional operational risk, including increased cybersecurity risk. These cyber risks include increased phishing, malware and other cybersecurity
attacks, vulnerability to disruptions of our information technology infrastructure and telecommunications systems for remote operations, increased risk of unauthorized dissemination of confidential information, limited ability to restore the systems
in the event of a systems failure or interruption, greater risk of a security breach resulting in destruction or misuse of valuable information and potential impairment of our ability to perform critical functions, including wiring funds, all of
which could expose us to risks of data or financial loss, litigation and liability and could seriously disrupt our operations and the operations of any impacted customers.
Moreover, we rely on many third parties in our business operations, including the appraiser(s) of the real property collateral, vendors that supply essential services such as loan servicers, providers
of financial information, systems and analytical tools and providers of electronic payment and settlement systems, and local and federal government agencies, offices and courthouses. In light of the developing measures responding to the pandemic,
many of these entities may limit the availability and access of their services. If the third-party service providers continue to have limited capacities for a prolonged period or if additional limitations or potential disruptions in these services
materialize, it may negatively affect our operations.
Interest Rate Risk: Our net interest income, lending activities, deposits and profitability could be negatively affected by volatility in interest rates caused by uncertainties stemming from
COVID-19. In March 2020, the Federal Reserve lowered the target range for the federal funds rate to a range from 0 to 0.25% , citing concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on markets and stress in the energy sector. A prolonged period of extremely
volatile and unstable market conditions would likely increase our funding costs and negatively affect market risk mitigation strategies. Higher income volatility from changes in interest rates and spreads to benchmark indices could cause a loss of
future net interest income and a decrease in current fair market values of our assets. Fluctuations in interest rates will impact both the level of income and expense recorded on most of our assets and liabilities and the market value of all
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our net income, operating results and financial condition.
Because there have been no comparable recent global pandemics that resulted in similar global impact, we do not yet know the full extent of COVID-19’s effects on our business, operations or the global economy as a
whole. Any future development will be highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic, the effectiveness of our work-from-home program, third-party providers’ ability to support our operation and any actions
taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response to the pandemic. The uncertain future development of this crisis could materially and adversely affect our business, operations, operating results, financial condition, liquidity
and capital levels.
39
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Ohio Valley did not sell any unregistered equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2020.
Ohio Valley did not purchase any of its shares during the three months ended March 31, 2020.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
40
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a)
|
Exhibits:
|
Exhibit Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
3.1
|
||
3.2
|
||
4
|
||
31.1
|
||
31.2
|
||
32
|
||
101.INS #
|
XBRL Instance Document: Filed herewith. #
|
|
101.SCH #
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema: Filed herewith. #
|
|
101.CAL #
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase: Filed herewith. #
|
|
101.DEF #
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase: Filed herewith. #
|
|
101.LAB #
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase: Filed herewith. #
|
|
101.PRE #
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase: Filed herewith. #
|
# Attached as Exhibit 101 are the following documents formatted in XBRL (eXtensive Business Reporting Language): (i) Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income;
(iii) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iv) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity; (v) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP.
|
|||
Date:
|
May 11, 2020
|
By:
|
/s/Thomas E. Wiseman |
Thomas E. Wiseman
|
|||
Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
Date:
|
May 11, 2020
|
By:
|
/s/Scott W. Shockey |
Scott W. Shockey
|
|||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
42