Oil-Dri Corp of America - Quarter Report: 2007 October (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x |
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
For
the
Quarterly Period Ended October 31, 2007
OR
o |
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
For
the
transition period from _____________ to ______________
Commission
File Number 0-8675
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA
(Exact
name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
36-2048898
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|
410
North Michigan Avenue, Suite 400
Chicago,
Illinois
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
60611-4213
(Zip
Code)
|
The
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (312) 321-1515
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
at
least the past 90 days.
Yes þ
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o
No
þ
The
aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock owned by non-affiliates
as of January 31, 2007 for accelerated filer purposes was
$79,036,000.
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the close of the period covered by this report.
Common
Stock - 5,051,099 Shares
Class
B
Stock - 1,909,797 Shares
CONTENTS
Page
|
||||
|
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item
1:
|
|
Financial
Statements
|
3
-
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2:
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results Of
Operations
|
14
- 18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3:
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4:
|
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1A:
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
6:
|
|
Exhibits
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
23
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain
statements in this report, including, but not limited to, those under the
heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations” and those statements elsewhere in this report and other documents
we file with the Commission contain forward-looking statements that are based
on
current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about our future
performance, our business, our beliefs, and our management’s assumptions. In
addition, we, or others on our behalf, may make forward-looking statements
in
press releases or written statements, or in our communications and discussions
with investors and analysts in the normal course of business through meetings,
webcasts, phone calls, and conference calls. Words such as “expect,” “outlook,”
“forecast,” “would”, “could,” “should,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “continue,”
“believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe”, “may,” “assume,”
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Such
statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that
could cause actual results to differ materially, including those described
in
Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2007, which risk factors are incorporated herein by reference.
Should one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or
should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary
materially from those anticipated, intended, expected, believed, estimated,
projected or planned. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Except
to
the extent required by law, we do not have any intention or obligation to update
publicly any forward-looking statements after the distribution of this report,
whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions,
or otherwise.
TRADEMARK
NOTICE
Oil-Dri,
Agsorb, Oil-Dri All Purpose, Oil-Dri Lites, Cat’s Pride, Jonny Cat, KatKit,
ConditionAde, Pure-Flo, UltraClear, Poultry Guard, Flo-Fre, Saular, Terra Green
and Pro’s Choice are all registered trademarks of Oil-Dri Corporation of America
or of its subsidiaries. PelUnite Plus, Perform and Select are trademarks of
Oil-Dri Corporation of America. Fresh Step is the registered trademark of The
Clorox Company.
2
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||||
ITEM
1. Financial Statements
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|||||
(in
thousands of dollars)
|
|||||
(unaudited)
|
October
31,
2007
|
July
31,
2007 |
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
Assets
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
5,370
|
$
|
12,133
|
|||
Investment
in treasury securities
|
22,350
|
17,894
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, less allowance of $597 and
|
|||||||
$569
at October 31, 2007 and July 31, 2007, respectively
|
27,579
|
27,933
|
|||||
Inventories
|
17,536
|
15,237
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
788
|
788
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
4,969
|
4,315
|
|||||
Total
Current Assets
|
78,592
|
78,300
|
|||||
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
|||||||
Cost
|
153,828
|
151,478
|
|||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(101,774
|
)
|
(100,033
|
)
|
|||
Total
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
52,054
|
51,445
|
|||||
Other
Assets
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
5,162
|
5,162
|
|||||
Trademarks
and patents, net of accumulated amortization
|
|||||||
of
$333 and $327 at October 31, 2007 and July 31, 2007, respectively
|
847
|
817
|
|||||
Debt
issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization
|
|||||||
of
$468 and $450 at October 31, 2007 and July 31, 2007, respectively
|
395
|
413
|
|||||
Licensing
agreements, net of accumulated amortization
|
|||||||
of
$2,807 and $2,757 at October 31, 2007 and July 31, 2007, respectively
|
632
|
682
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,673
|
1,618
|
|||||
Other
|
3,701
|
3,650
|
|||||
Total
Other Assets
|
12,410
|
12,342
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
143,056
|
$
|
142,087
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated
financial statements.
|
3
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
||
(in
thousands of dollars)
|
||
(unaudited)
|
October
31,
2007
|
July
31,
2007
|
||||||
LIABILITIES
& STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
|||||||
Current
maturities of notes payable
|
$
|
8,080
|
$
|
4,080
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
6,395
|
6,181
|
|||||
Dividends
payable
|
842
|
833
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses:
|
|||||||
Salaries,
wages and commissions
|
3,370
|
7,052
|
|||||
Trade
promotions and advertising
|
2,667
|
2,395
|
|||||
Freight
|
1,815
|
1,305
|
|||||
Other
|
5,853
|
5,559
|
|||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
29,022
|
27,405
|
|||||
Noncurrent
Liabilities
|
|||||||
Notes
payable
|
23,000
|
27,080
|
|||||
Deferred
compensation
|
4,848
|
4,756
|
|||||
Other
|
2,828
|
2,604
|
|||||
Total
Noncurrent Liabilities
|
30,676
|
34,440
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities
|
59,698
|
61,845
|
|||||
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|||||||
Common
Stock, par value $.10 per share, issued
|
|||||||
7,337,325
shares at October 31, 2007 and 7,270,167 shares
at July 31, 2007
|
734
|
727
|
|||||
Class
B Stock, par value $.10 per share, issued
|
|||||||
2,234,538
shares at October 31, 2007 and 2,234,538 shares
at July 31, 2007
|
223
|
223
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
21,056
|
20,150
|
|||||
Restricted
unearned stock compensation
|
(908
|
)
|
(991
|
)
|
|||
Retained
earnings
|
102,144
|
100,503
|
|||||
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
|||||||
Unrealized
gain on marketable securities
|
85
|
59
|
|||||
Pension
and postretirement benefits
|
863
|
857
|
|||||
Cumulative
translation adjustment
|
954
|
507
|
|||||
|
125,151
|
122,035
|
|||||
Less
Treasury Stock, at cost (2,286,226 Common and 324,741
|
|||||||
Class
B shares at October 31, 2007 and 2,286,226 Common and
|
|||||||
324,741
Class B shares at July 31, 2007)
|
(41,793
|
)
|
(41,793
|
)
|
|||
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
83,358
|
80,242
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
|
$
|
143,056
|
$
|
142,087
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated
financial statements.
|
4
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained
Earnings
|
|||
(in
thousands, except for per share amounts)
|
|||
(unaudited)
|
For
The Three Months Ended
October
31
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Net
Sales
|
$
|
55,285
|
$
|
52,129
|
|||
Cost
of Sales
|
(42,855
|
)
|
(41,466
|
)
|
|||
Gross
Profit
|
12,430
|
10,663
|
|||||
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
(8,860
|
)
|
(8,161
|
)
|
|||
Income
from Operations
|
3,570
|
2,502
|
|||||
Other
Income (Expense)
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(574
|
)
|
(617
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
368
|
338
|
|||||
Other,
net
|
62
|
25
|
|||||
Total
Other Expense, Net
|
(144
|
)
|
(254
|
)
|
|||
Income
Before Income Taxes
|
3,426
|
2,248
|
|||||
Income
taxes
|
(942
|
)
|
(601
|
)
|
|||
Net
Income
|
2,484
|
1,647
|
|||||
Retained
Earnings
|
|||||||
Balance
at beginning of year
|
100,503
|
97,390
|
|||||
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax*
|
—
|
(1,235
|
)
|
||||
Cash
dividends declared and treasury stock reissuances
|
(843
|
)
|
(755
|
)
|
|||
Retained
Earnings - October 31
|
$
|
102,144
|
$
|
97,047
|
|||
Net
Income Per Share
|
|||||||
Basic
Common
|
$
|
0.38
|
$
|
0.27
|
|||
Basic
Class B
|
$
|
0.31
|
$
|
0.20
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.35
|
$
|
0.24
|
|||
Average
Shares Outstanding
|
|||||||
Basic
Common
|
5,004
|
4,852
|
|||||
Basic
Class B
|
1,840
|
1,804
|
|||||
Diluted
|
7,145
|
6,913
|
*
See Note 8 of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
for a description of the change in
accounting for stripping costs incurred during
production.
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated
financial statements.
|
5
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income
|
|||
(in
thousands of dollars)
|
|||
(unaudited)
|
For
The Three Months Ended
October
31
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
2,484
|
$
|
1,647
|
|||
Other
Comprehensive Income:
|
|||||||
Unrealized
gain on marketable securities
|
26
|
8
|
|||||
Pension
and postretirement benefits
|
6
|
—
|
|||||
Cumulative
Translation Adjustments
|
447
|
74
|
|||||
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
$
|
2,963
|
$
|
1,729
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|||
(in
thousands of dollars)
|
|||
(unaudited)
|
For
The Three Months Ended October 31
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
2,484
|
$
|
1,647
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
|||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,862
|
1,824
|
|||||
Amortization
of investment discount
|
(248
|
)
|
(220
|
)
|
|||
Non-cash
stock compensation expense
|
245
|
297
|
|||||
Excess
tax benefits for share-based payments
|
(158
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
income taxes
|
21
|
1
|
|||||
Provision
for bad debts
|
59
|
22
|
|||||
Loss
on the sale of fixed assets
|
37
|
6
|
|||||
(Increase)
Decrease in:
|
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
295
|
84
|
|||||
Inventories
|
(2,299
|
)
|
(250
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(654
|
)
|
(442
|
)
|
|||
Other
assets
|
514
|
35
|
|||||
Increase
(Decrease) in:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
296
|
(1,034
|
)
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(2,606
|
)
|
(164
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
compensation
|
92
|
16
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
64
|
218
|
|||||
Total
Adjustments
|
(2,480
|
)
|
392
|
||||
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
4
|
2,039
|
|||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(2,147
|
)
|
(2,352
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
—
|
30
|
|||||
Purchases
of treasury securities
|
(30,208
|
)
|
(8,083
|
)
|
|||
Dispositions
of treasury securities
|
26,000
|
10,700
|
|||||
Net
Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities
|
(6,355
|
)
|
295
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Principal
payments on notes payable
|
(80
|
)
|
(80
|
)
|
|||
Dividends
paid
|
(834
|
)
|
(754
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
593
|
29
|
|||||
Excess
tax benefits for share-based payments
|
158
|
1
|
|||||
Other,
net
|
158
|
45
|
|||||
Net
Cash Used in Financing Activities
|
(5
|
)
|
(759
|
)
|
|||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(407
|
)
|
(55
|
)
|
|||
Net
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
(6,763
|
)
|
1,520
|
||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year
|
12,133
|
6,607
|
|||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, October 31
|
$
|
5,370
|
$
|
8,127
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated
financial statements.
|
7
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS
OF STATEMENT PRESENTATION
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of
America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to
Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include
all
of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial
statements. The financial statements and the related notes are condensed and
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
related notes for the year ended July 31, 2007, included in our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the parent
company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions are
eliminated.
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of the statements contained
herein. Operating results for the three months ended October 31, 2007 are not
necessarily an indication of the results that may be expected for the fiscal
year ending July 31, 2008.
The
preparation of the unaudited financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP
requires the use of estimates and assumptions related to the reporting of
assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures. Estimates
are
revised periodically. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Under
the
terms of our sales agreements with customers, we recognize revenue when title
is
transferred. Upon shipment an invoice is generated that sets the fixed and
determinable price. Promotional reserves are provided for sales incentives
made
directly to consumers and customers and are netted against sales. Sales returns
and allowances have historically not been material. Selling, general and
administrative expenses include salaries, wages and benefits associated with
staff outside the manufacturing and distribution functions, advertising costs,
research and development costs and all other non-manufacturing and
non-distribution expenses.
We
evaluate our allowance for doubtful accounts utilizing a combination of a
historical experience and a periodic review of our accounts receivable aging
and
specific customer account analysis. We maintain and monitor a list of customers
whose creditworthiness has diminished.
As
part
of our overall operations, we mine sorbent materials on property that we either
own or lease. A significant part of our overall mining cost is incurred during
the process of removing the overburden (non-usable material) from the mine
site,
thus exposing the sorbent material that is then used in a majority of our
production processes. In accordance with EITF Issue No. 04-06, “Accounting for
Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry,” production
stripping costs are treated as a variable inventory production cost and are
included in cost of sales in the period they are incurred. We defer and amortize
the pre-production overburden removal costs associated with opening a new
mine.
During
the normal course of our overburden removal activities we perform on-going
reclamation activities. As overburden is removed from a pit, it is hauled to
previously mined pits and used to refill older sites. This process allows us
to
continuously reclaim older pits and dispose of overburden simultaneously,
therefore minimizing the liability for the reclamation function.
Additionally,
it is our policy to capitalize the purchase cost of land and mineral rights,
including associated legal fees, survey fees and real estate fees. The costs
of
obtaining mineral patents, including legal fees and drilling expenses, are
also
capitalized. Pre-production development costs on new mines and any prepaid
royalties that can be offset against future royalties due upon extraction of
the
mineral are also capitalized. All exploration related costs are expensed as
incurred.
8
2. INVENTORIES
The
composition of inventories is as follows (in thousands of dollars):
October
31,
|
July
31,
|
||||||
2007
|
2007
|
||||||
Finished
goods
|
$
|
11,046
|
$
|
9,012
|
|||
Packaging
|
3,285
|
3,118
|
|||||
Other
|
3,205
|
3,107
|
|||||
$
|
17,536
|
$
|
15,237
|
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventory
costs
include the cost of raw materials, packaging supplies, labor and other overhead
costs. We perform a quarterly review of our inventory items to determine if
an
obsolescence reserve adjustment is necessary. The review surveys all of our
operating facilities and sales groups to ensure that both historical issues
and
new market trends are considered. The allowance not only considers specific
items, but also takes into consideration the overall value of the inventory
as
of the balance sheet date. The inventory obsolescence reserve values at October
31, 2007 and July 31, 2007 were $201,000 and $199,000, respectively.
3. PENSION
AND OTHER POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The
components of net periodic pension benefits cost of our sponsored defined
benefit plans were as follows:
PENSION
PLANS
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
October
31,
2007
|
October
31,
2006
|
||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||
Components
of net periodic pension benefit cost
|
|||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
212
|
$
|
207
|
|||
Interest
cost
|
292
|
275
|
|||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(347
|
)
|
(301
|
)
|
|||
Net
amortization
|
49
|
6
|
|||||
$
|
206
|
$
|
187
|
We
have
funded the plan based upon actuarially determined contributions that take into
account the amount deductible for income tax purposes, the normal cost and
the
minimum contribution required and the maximum contribution allowed under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. We did not make
a
contribution to our pension plan during the first quarter of the fiscal year
ending July 31, 2008. We intend to make a contribution to the pension plan
during the current fiscal year equal to the annual actuarial determined cost.
We
currently estimate this amount to be approximately $830,000.
The
components of the net periodic postretirement health benefit cost were as
follows:
POST
RETIREMENT HEALTH BENEFITS
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
October
31,
2007
|
October
31,
2006
|
||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||
Components
of net periodic postretirement benefit cost
|
|||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
17
|
$
|
16
|
|||
Interest
cost
|
18
|
16
|
|||||
Amortization
of net transition obligation
|
4
|
4
|
|||||
Net
actuarial loss
|
7
|
1
|
|||||
$
|
46
|
$
|
37
|
Our
plan
covering postretirement health benefits is an unfunded plan.
9
Assumptions
used in the previous calculations are as follows:
PENSION
PLAN
|
POST
RETIREMENT HEALTH BENEFITS
|
||||||||||||
For
three months ended:
|
|||||||||||||
October
31,
2007
|
October
31,
2006
|
October
31,
2007
|
October
31,
2006
|
||||||||||
Discount
rate for net periodic benefit cost
|
6.25
|
%
|
6.25
|
%
|
6.25
|
%
|
6.25
|
%
|
|||||
Rate
of increase in compensation levels
|
4.00
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Long-term
expected rate of return on assets
|
8.00
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Medical
trend
|
—
|
—
|
6.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
|||||||
Measurement
date
|
7/31/2007
|
7/31/2006
|
7/31/2007
|
7/31/2006
|
|||||||||
Census
date
|
8/1/2006
|
8/1/2005
|
8/1/2006
|
8/1/2005
|
4.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements.” This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We will adopt the
provisions of this Statement as of August 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating
the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on our consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities.” This Statement permits entities to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at
specified election dates. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the
fair value option has been elected will be reported in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. The Statement also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements relating to items measured at fair value. The provisions
of this Statement are to be applied prospectively and we will adopt this
Statement as of August 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of
adoption of SFAS No. 159 on our consolidated financial statements.
In
August
2006, President Bush signed into law The Pension Protection Act of 2006, which
will affect the manner in
which
we administer our defined benefit pension plan. This legislation requires,
among
other things, one set of funding rules for determining minimum required
contributions to defined benefit plans based on a comparison of the plan’s
assets to the plan’s liabilities, higher premium payments to the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation by sponsors of defined benefit plans, plan document
amendments and additional plan disclosures in regulatory filings and to plan
participants. This legislation will be effective for plan years beginning after
December 31, 2007, with certain transition rules for 2008 through 2010. We
are
currently assessing the impact that it may have on our consolidated financial
statements.
5. SEGMENT
REPORTING
SFAS
No.
131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”
establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Under
this standard, we have two reportable operating segments: Retail and Wholesale
Products and Business to Business Products. These segments are managed
separately because each business has different customer characteristics. Net
sales and operating income for each segment are provided below. Revenues by
product line are not provided because it would be impracticable to do
so.
The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note
1 of
the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
10
Management
does not rely on any segment asset allocations and does not consider them
meaningful because of the shared nature of our production facilities; however,
we have estimated the segment asset allocations as follows:
Assets
|
|||||||
October
31,
|
July
31,
|
||||||
2007
|
2007
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Business
to Business Products
|
$
|
36,690
|
$
|
35,298
|
|||
Retail
and Wholesale Products
|
63,893
|
61,992
|
|||||
Unallocated
Assets
|
42,473
|
44,797
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
143,056
|
$
|
142,087
|
Three
Months Ended October 31,
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
Income
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Business
to Business Products
|
$
|
16,917
|
$
|
16,885
|
$
|
4,001
|
$
|
3,398
|
|||||
Retail
and Wholesale Products
|
38,368
|
35,244
|
4,350
|
3,549
|
|||||||||
Total
Sales/Operating Income
|
$
|
55,285
|
$
|
52,129
|
8,351
|
6,947
|
|||||||
Less:
|
|||||||||||||
Corporate
Expenses
|
4,719
|
4,420
|
|||||||||||
Interest
Expense, net of
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
Income
|
206
|
279
|
|||||||||||
Income
before Income Taxes
|
3,426
|
2,248
|
|||||||||||
Income
Taxes
|
(942
|
)
|
(601
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
2,484
|
$
|
1,647
|
6. STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
We
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),
“Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”) in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. In
accordance with this pronouncement, we record compensation expense for all
awards granted after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of
previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.
The
stock-based compensation expense in the first three months of fiscal years
2008
and 2007 is the cost related to the unvested portion of grants issued after
August 1, 2000 and grants issued after July 31, 2005. The stock options granted
before August 1, 2000 were fully vested as of the beginning of fiscal
2006.
Stock
Options
Our
1995
Long Term Incentive Plan (the “1995 Plan”) provided for grants of both incentive
and non-qualified stock options principally at an option price per share of
100%
of the fair market value of our Class A Common Stock or, if no Class A Common
Stock is outstanding, our Common Stock (“Stock”) on the date of grant. Stock
options were generally granted with a five-year vesting period and a 10-year
term. The stock options generally vest 25% two years after the grant date and
25% in each of the three following anniversaries of the grant date. This plan
expired for purposes of issuing new grants on August 5, 2005. All stock issued
from option exercises under this plan were from authorized but unissued stock.
All restricted stock issued was from treasury stock.
On
March
14, 2006, our Board of Directors unanimously approved adoption of the Oil-Dri
Corporation of America 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan; our Board amended and
restated the plan following the five-for-four stock split described below (as
so
amended and restated, the “2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan was approved by our
stockholders at our annual meeting on December 5, 2006. The 2006 Plan permits
the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, performance awards and other stock-based and cash-based
awards. Our employees and non-employee directors are eligible to receive
grants under the 2006 Plan. The total number of shares of Stock subject to
grants under the 2006 Plan may not exceed 919,500. Option grants covering 25,000
shares were issued to our outside directors with a vesting period of one year
and option grants covering 32,500 shares were issued to employees with vesting
similar to the vesting described above under the 1995 Plan. There were 90,000
shares of restricted stock issued under the 2006 Plan.
The
Oil-Dri Corporation of America Outside Director Stock Plan (the “Directors’
Plan”) provides for grants of stock options to our directors at an option price
per share of 100% of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of grant.
Our directors are considered employees under the provisions of SFAS 123R. Stock
options have been granted to our directors for a 10-year term with a one year
vesting period. There are 106,250 stock options outstanding and no stock options
available for future grants under this plan. All stock issued under this plan
were from treasury stock.
11
A
five-for-four stock split was announced by our Board on June 6, 2006. In keeping
with historical practices, we have adjusted the number of shares and the option
prices to equitably adjust all outstanding stock options. Under SFAS 123R,
the
equitable adjustment of outstanding options to reflect a change in
capitalization (such as a stock split) may require the recognition of
incremental compensation expense if the adjustment is not determined to have
been required by the actual terms of the equity incentive plan. The Directors’
Plan and the 1995 Plan may be deemed to have been discretionary, rather than
required by the actual terms of these plans. We therefore recognized additional
stock-based compensation expense relating to the modification of approximately
$111,000 and $142,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
The
fair
value of the fiscal 2007 stock options was estimated on the date of grant using
a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The
assumptions used during the full fiscal 2007 were: volatility, 22.4%; risk
free
interest rate, 4.6%; expected life, 5.0 years; dividend rate, 2.8%. There were
no stock options granted in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The
risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time
of grant. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of the
options granted was estimated by reference to the vesting schedule, historical
and future expected exercise behavior of employees and comparison with other
reporting companies. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility
for
a period of five years, ending the day of grant, and calculated on a daily
basis. The dividend rate is based on the actual dividend and share price on
the
grant date.
Changes
in our stock options as of October 31, 2007 were as follows:
Number
of Shares (in thousands)
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding, July 31, 2007
|
786
|
$
|
8.87
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
(67
|
)
|
8.82
|
$
|
636
|
||||||||
Cancelled
|
(5
|
)
|
9.43
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding, October 31, 2007
|
714
|
$
|
8.87
|
4.8
|
$
|
7,660
|
|||||||
Options
exercisable, October 31, 2007
|
487
|
$
|
8.87
|
4.4
|
$
|
5,220
|
The
amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options during the first
quarter of fiscal 2008 was $593,000 and the related tax benefit was $158,000.
Restricted
Stock
Our
1995
Plan and 2006 Plan both provide for grants of restricted stock. The vesting
schedule under the 1995 Plan has varied, but has generally been three years
or
less. Under the 2006 Plan, the grants issued so far have vesting periods between
three and five years.
Included
in our stock-based compensation expense in the first three months of fiscal
2008
and 2007 is $83,000 and $82,000, respectively, related to the unvested
restricted stock granted in fiscal 2005 and the 90,000 shares of restricted
stock granted in fiscal 2006. No shares of restricted stock were granted in
the
first three months of fiscal 2008.
There
were no changes in our restricted stock outstanding during the first quarter
of
fiscal 2008.
(shares
in thousands)
|
|
||||||
|
|
Restricted
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|||
Unvested
restricted stock at July 31, 2007
|
76
|
$
|
15.38
|
||||
Unvested
restricted stock at October 31, 2007
|
76
|
$
|
15.38
|
12
7. RECENTLY
ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PROUNOUNCEMENT
We
adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes,” (“FIN 48”) on August 1, 2007. This interpretation clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes.” The pronouncement provides a recognition
threshold and measurement guidance for the financial statement recognition
of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Under FIN 48, the
impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be
recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained
upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position
will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained.
Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, declassification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition.
As
of
August 1, 2007, we have recognized no material adjustments in the liability
for
unrecognized income tax benefits. As of the adoption date on August 1, 2007,
we
had approximately $200,000 of unrecognized tax benefits, all of which would
impact our effective tax rate if recognized. The amount of unrecognized tax
benefits was not materially changed as of October 31, 2007.
We
recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income
tax expense. We have no material accrued interest expense or penalties related
to unrecognized tax benefits.
We
are
subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple state
and
foreign jurisdictions. Our federal income tax returns for the fiscal years
ending July 31, 2004, through July 31, 2006, remain open for examination by
the
IRS. However, all U.S. federal income tax examinations for the fiscal years
through July 31, 2005, have been effectively concluded. Foreign and U.S. state
jurisdictions have statutes of limitations generally ranging from 3 to 5 years.
The state impact of any federal income tax changes remains subject to
examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal
notification to the states. There are no material open or unsettled federal,
state, local or foreign income tax audits. We believe our accrual for tax
liabilities is adequate for all open audit years. This assessment is based
on
estimates and assumptions that may involve judgments about future events. On
the
basis of present information, we do not anticipate the total unrecognized tax
benefits will significantly change due to the settlement of audits or the
expiration of statue of limitations in the next twelve months.
8.
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING FOR STRIPPING COSTS INCURRED DURING
PRODUCTION
In
March
2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ratified the consensus reached
in
EITF Issue No. 04-06 (“EITF Issue 04-06”), “Accounting for Stripping Costs
Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry.” The consensus was effective
for the first fiscal period in the fiscal year beginning after December 15,
2005; therefore, we adopted the pronouncement at the beginning of fiscal 2007.
The consensus on EITF Issue 04-06 calls for production stripping costs to be
treated as a variable inventory production cost and to be included in cost
of
sales in the period they are incurred. We will continue to defer and amortize
the pre-production overburden removal costs associated with opening a new mine.
Prior
to
this new pronouncement, we recorded these production stripping costs in a
prepaid expense account and, as the usable sorbent material was mined, the
prepaid overburden removal expense was amortized over the estimated available
material. In accordance with the transition guidance provided by this new
pronouncement, we wrote off the August 1, 2006 balance of our prepaid overburden
removal expense account to opening retained earnings, with no charge to current
earnings. The results for prior periods have not been restated. The cumulative
effect adjustment reduced opening retained earnings by $1,235,000, eliminated
the $1,686,000 balance of the prepaid overburden removal expense account and
adjusted our tax accounts by $451,000.
9. SUBSEQUENT
EVENT
During
the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we entered into an agreement to sell emission
reduction credits we hold in the State of California to an unaffiliated third
party. On November 1, 2007, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control
District completed the transfer of ownership forms and releases, thereby
consummating the sale. We will report a pre-tax gain in other income of
approximately $500,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
13
ITEM
2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read together with the financial statements and the related
notes included herein and our consolidated financial statements, accompanying
notes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended July 31, 2007. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from
the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might
cause a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed under
“Forward-Looking Statements” and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007.
OVERVIEW
We
develop, manufacture and market sorbent products principally produced from
clay
minerals and, to a lesser extent, other sorbent materials. Our principal
products include cat litter, industrial and automotive absorbents, bleaching
clay and clarification aids, agricultural chemical carriers, animal health
and
nutrition and sports field products. Our products are sold to two primary
customer groups, including customers who resell our products as originally
produced to the end customer and those who use our products as part of their
production process or use them as an ingredient in their final finished product.
We have organized our management group to best support our customers’ needs. As
a result, we have two reportable segments, the Retail and Wholesale Products
Group and the Business to Business Products Group.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
THREE
MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2007 COMPARED TO THREE
MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2006
Consolidated
net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2007 were $55,285,000, an
increase of 6% from net sales of $52,129,000 in the first quarter of fiscal
2007. Net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 was $2,484,000, an
increase of 51% from net income of $1,647,000 in the first quarter of fiscal
2007. Diluted income per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 was $0.35
versus $0.24 diluted net income per share for the first quarter of fiscal
2007.
Net
income for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 was positively impacted by price
increases, slightly lower costs of fuel used in our production processes and
company-wide efforts to reduce other costs. Sales volume increased in the Retail
and Wholesale Products Group, which further contributed to overall
profitability. Non-fuel manufacturing costs decreased for the quarter; however,
freight costs were negatively impacted by higher diesel fuel prices and changes
in our geographic distribution mix.
Net
sales
of the Business to Business Products Group for the first quarter of fiscal
2008
were $16,917,000, an increase of $32,000 from net sales of $16,885,000 in the
first quarter of fiscal 2007. Sales of bleaching earth were up 19% due to price
increases and new business, which included applications in the biodiesel
production industry. Sales of animal health and nutrition products also
increased primarily due to price increases and 21% higher volume for our
mycotoxin binder products. We have enhanced our efforts to advance these
mycotoxin binder products in the global marketplace. Sports products experienced
an 8% sales increase, largely attributable to strong sales of baseball products.
Partially offsetting these increases were sales declines in agricultural
chemical carriers and co-manufactured products. Agricultural chemical carrier
sales decreased 34% due to lower volume. The decline reflects the continued
market erosion due to growth of genetically modified seed and seed treatments.
Our co-packaged traditional coarse cat litter net sales were down 2% in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008.
The
Business to Business Products Group’s segment income increased 18% from
$3,398,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 to $4,001,000 in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008. The net selling price was higher for most products
in
the Group in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 versus the first quarter of fiscal
2007. These price increases overcame the overall 6% lower volume for the Group,
which was driven by the lower agricultural chemical carrier sales. Combined
material, packaging and freight costs were held to approximately a 1% increase.
Freight costs increased due to higher diesel fuel prices and a change in our
customer geographical mix associated with new business; however, material costs
declined due to successful programs to improve production efficiency and a
small
decline in the cost of fuel used in our production processes.
Net
sales
of the Retail and Wholesale Products Group for the first quarter of fiscal
2008
were $38,368,000, an increase of $3,124,000 from net sales of $35,244,000
reported in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Net sales of private label cat
litter increased 45% due to higher volume and price increases. The higher volume
is the result of new distribution and new customers. In contrast, branded cat
litter sales declined 8% due to loss of distribution to one customer. Sales
of
clay-based industrial absorbents were also down 5% for the quarter due to lower
volume.
14
The
Retail and Wholesale Products Group’s segment income increased 23% from
$3,549,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 to $4,350,000 in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008. The Group’s overall 6% increase in volume, higher
selling prices and successful efforts to lower costs contributed to this
increase. Combined material, packaging and freight costs were approximately
1%
lower in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to the first quarter of
fiscal 2007. Similar to the Business to Business Products Group, the cost of
fuel used in our production processes and material costs are lower, while
freight costs have increased. In addition, procurement cost savings initiatives
continue to provide packaging cost reductions for this Group.
Consolidated
gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the first
quarter
of
fiscal 2008 increased to 23% from 21% in the first
quarter
of
fiscal 2007. Price increases and successful efforts to reduce costs and improve
production efficiency have helped improve margins. Non-fuel manufacturing costs
decreased 2%, which had a positive impact on gross profit. In particular, repair
costs were lower in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Further contributing
to
the improved gross profit was a 2% decrease in the cost of fuel used in the
manufacturing process in the first quarter
of
fiscal 2008 compared to the first
quarter
of
fiscal 2007.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales for the first
quarter of fiscal 2008 were 16%, the same as the first quarter of fiscal
2007.
Interest
expense was down $43,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to
the
same period in fiscal 2007 due to continued debt reduction. Interest income
was
up $30,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Higher average investment
balances provided additional interest income; however, lower interest rates
reduced the potential interest income increase.
Our
effective tax rate was 28% of pre-tax income in the first quarter of fiscal
2008
compared to 27% in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The effective tax rate
is
up slightly based on the projected composition of our taxable income for fiscal
2008.
FOREIGN
OPERATIONS
Net
sales
by our foreign subsidiaries during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 were
$4,492,000 or 8% of total Company sales. This represents an increase of 5%
from
the first quarter of fiscal 2007, in which foreign subsidiary sales were
$4,298,000 or 8% of total Company sales. The increase in net sales was seen
in
both our Canadian and United Kingdom operations. Both operations’ sales were up
due to higher selling prices. For the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the foreign
subsidiaries reported net income of $323,000, an increase of $352,000 from
the
$29,000 net loss reported in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The improved
net
income is primarily the result of the higher selling prices and lower material
costs in Canada due to new material sourcing. Similar to our domestic
operations, the Canadian subsidiary also experienced freight cost
increases.
Identifiable
assets of our foreign subsidiaries as of October 31, 2007 were $10,251,000,
compared to $9,449,000 as of October 31, 2006. The increase was driven by
increased cash and investments and increased accounts receivable corresponding
to the increased sales.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our
principal capital requirements include funding working capital needs, the
purchasing and upgrading of real estate, equipment and facilities, and investing
in infrastructure and potential acquisitions. We principally have used cash
generated from operations and, to the extent needed, issuance of debt securities
and borrowings under our credit facilities to fund these requirements. Cash
and
cash equivalents decreased $6,763,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2008
to
$5,370,000 at October 31, 2007.
The
following table sets forth certain elements of our unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
October
31, 2007
|
October
31, 2006
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
4
|
$
|
2,039
|
|||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(6,355
|
)
|
295
|
||||
Net
cash used in provided by financing activities
|
(5
|
)
|
(759
|
)
|
|||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(407
|
)
|
(55
|
)
|
|||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(6,763
|
)
|
1,520
|
15
Net
cash provided by operating activities
Net
cash
provided by operations was $4,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2007,
compared to $2,039,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2006. The decrease
was due primarily to changes in working capital that offset the increase in
net
income. For the first three months of fiscal years 2008 and 2007, the primary
components of working capital that impacted operating cash flows were as
follows:
Accounts
receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts, decreased by $354,000 in
the
first three months of fiscal 2008 versus a decrease of $106,000 in the first
three months of fiscal 2007. Accounts receivable was lower at the end of the
first quarter in both fiscal years despite an increase in sales over the
previous year’s fourth quarter. The decrease in both years is due to timing of
sales and collections and ongoing efforts to improve collection
procedures.
Inventories
increased $2,299,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008, versus an
increase of $250,000 in the same period in fiscal 2007. Inventories increased
in
the first three months of fiscal 2008 in an effort to build finished goods
inventory to meet future demand of specific products and to level production.
The increase in the first three months of fiscal 2007 was due to normal
seasonality.
Other
prepaid expenses increased $654,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008
versus an increase of $442,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2007. The
increase in both years is due primarily to the timing of insurance premium
payments.
Accounts
payable increased $296,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008 versus
a
decrease of $1,034,000 in the same period in fiscal 2007. The increase in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 was due to normal fluctuations in the timing of
payments. The decrease in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was due to timing
of
payments and a decline in fuel costs.
Accrued
expenses decreased $2,606,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008 versus
a
decrease of $164,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2007. The decrease
in
both years was due to the payout of the prior fiscal year’s discretionary bonus
accrual and lower accrued fuel expense due to lower costs of fuel used in
production. For the first three months of fiscal 2008, this decrease was
partially offset by a higher freight expense accrual due to higher freight
costs
and the timing of shipments at quarter-end.
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
Cash
used
in investing activities was $6,355,000 in the first three months of fiscal
2008
compared to cash provided by investing activities of $295,000 in the first
three
months of fiscal 2007. In the first three months of fiscal 2008, more cash
was
used for purchases of Treasury securities as compared to the first three months
of fiscal 2007. Purchases and dispositions of Treasury securities in both
periods are also subject to variations in the timing of investment maturities.
Capital expenditures were $2,147,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008
compared to $2,352,000 in the same period of fiscal 2007.
Net
cash used in financing activities
Cash
used
in financing activities was $5,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008
compared to $759,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2007. Dividend payments
were $834,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008, compared to $754,000
in
the first three months of fiscal 2007 due to a dividend increase. Conversely,
higher stock options exercise activity in the first three months of fiscal
2008
provided $593,000 from the issuance of common stock compared to $29,000 for
the
same period in fiscal 2007. The increase in stock option exercises also provided
an excess tax benefit of $158,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared
to $1,000 in the same period of fiscal 2007.
Other
Total
cash and investment balances held by our foreign subsidiaries at October 31,
2007 and 2006 were $1,016,000 and $561,000, respectively.
Our
foreign subsidiaries’ investment balances increased due to higher net income.
As
part
of our normal course of business, we guarantee certain debts and trade payables
of our wholly owned subsidiaries. These arrangements are made at the request
of
the subsidiaries’ creditors because separate financial statements are not
distributed for the wholly owned subsidiaries. As of October 31, 2007, the
value
of these guarantees was $22,000 of lease liabilities and $2,500,000 of long-term
debt.
16
On
January 27, 2006, we entered into a $15,000,000 unsecured revolving credit
agreement with Harris N.A. (“Harris”) that is effective until January 27, 2009.
The credit agreement provides that we may select a variable rate based on either
Harris’ prime rate or a LIBOR-based rate, plus a margin which varies depending
on our debt to earnings ratio, or a fixed rate as agreed between us and Harris.
At October 31, 2007, the variable rates would have been 7.8% for the Harris’
prime-based rate or 5.8% for the LIBOR-based rate. At October 31, 2006, the
variable rates would have been 8.3% for the Harris’ prime-based rate or 6.3% for
the LIBOR-based rate. The credit agreement contains restrictive covenants that,
among other things and under various conditions (including a limitation on
capital expenditures), limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness or
to
dispose of assets. The agreement also requires us to maintain a minimum fixed
coverage ratio and a minimum consolidated net worth. As of October 31, 2007
and
2006, we had $15,000,000 available under this credit facility and we were in
compliance with its covenants.
We
believe that cash flow from operations, availability under our revolving credit
facility and current cash and investment balances will provide adequate cash
funds for foreseeable working capital needs, capital expenditures at existing
facilities and debt service obligations for at least the next 12 months. Our
ability to fund operations, to make planned capital expenditures, to make
scheduled debt payments and to remain in compliance with all of the financial
covenants under debt agreements, including, but not limited to, the credit
agreement, depends on our future operating performance, which, in turn, is
subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other
factors. The timing and size of any new business ventures or acquisitions that
we complete may also impact the cash requirements.
Our
capital requirements are subject to change as business conditions warrant and
opportunities arise. The tables in the following subsection summarize our
contractual obligations and commercial commitments at October 31, 2007 for
the
time frames indicated.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
Payments
Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
Than 1 Year
|
1
- 3 Years
|
4
- 5 Years
|
After
5 Years
|
|||||||||||
Long-Term
Debt
|
$
|
31,080,000
|
$
|
8,080,000
|
$
|
6,200,000
|
$
|
7,900,000
|
$
|
8,900,000
|
||||||
Interest
on Long-Term Debt
|
6,809,000
|
1,758,000
|
2,601,000
|
1,700,000
|
750,000
|
|||||||||||
Operating
Leases
|
10,789,000
|
1,872,000
|
2,648,000
|
1,813,000
|
4,456,000
|
|||||||||||
Unconditional
Purchase Obligations
|
5,952,000
|
5,952,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Total
Contractual Cash Obligations
|
$
|
54,630,000
|
$
|
17,662,000
|
$
|
11,449,000
|
$
|
11,413,000
|
$
|
14,106,000
|
We
are
not required to make a contribution to our defined benefit pension plan in
fiscal 2008. We have not presented this obligation for future years in the
table
above because the funding requirement can vary from year to year based on
changes in the fair value of plan assets and actuarial assumptions.
The
unconditional purchase obligations represent forward purchase contracts we
have
entered into for a portion of our natural gas fuel needs for fiscal 2008. As
of
October 31, 2007, the remaining purchase obligation for fiscal 2008 was
$5,952,000 for 670,000 MMBtu. These contracts were entered into in the normal
course of business and no contracts were entered into for speculative purposes.
Amount
of Commitment Expiration Per Period
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
Commercial Commitments
|
Total
|
Less
Than 1 Year
|
1
- 3 Years
|
4
- 5 Years
|
After
5 Years
|
|||||||||||
Standby
Letters of Credit
|
$
|
253,000
|
$
|
253,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Other
Commercial Commitments
|
27,280,000
|
27,280,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Total
Commercial Commitments
|
$
|
27,533,000
|
$
|
27,533,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
17
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
This
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
based on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have
been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use
of
estimates and assumptions related to the reporting of assets, liabilities,
revenues, expenses and related disclosures. In preparing these financial
statements, we have made our best estimates and judgments of certain amounts
included in the financial statements. Estimates are revised periodically. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
See
the
information concerning our critical accounting policies included under
Management’s Discussion of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is incorporated by reference
in
this Form 10-Q. For additional information on our adoption of FIN 48, see Note
7
of the notes to unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements”. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We will adopt the
provisions of this Statement as of August 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating
the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on our consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities”. This Statement permits entities to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at
specified election dates. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the
fair value option has been elected will be reported in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. The Statement also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements relating to items measured at fair value. The provisions
of this Statement are to be applied prospectively and we will adopt this
Statement as of August 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of
adoption of SFAS No. 159 on our consolidated financial statements.
In
August
2006, President Bush signed into law The Pension Protection Act of 2006, which
will affect the manner in
which
we administer our defined benefit pension plan. This legislation requires,
among
other things, one set of funding rules for determining minimum required
contributions to defined benefit plans based on a comparison of the plan’s
assets to the plan’s liabilities, higher premium payments to the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation by sponsors of defined benefit plans, plan document
amendments and additional plan disclosures in regulatory filings and to plan
participants. This legislation will be effective for plan years beginning after
December 31, 2007, with certain transition rules for 2008 through 2010. We
are
currently assessing the impact that it may have on our consolidated financial
statements.
18
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
We
are
exposed to interest rate risk and employ policies and procedures to manage
our
exposure to changes in the market risk of our cash equivalents and short-term
investments. We had two interest rate swap agreements as of October 31, 2007.
We
believe that the market risk arising from holding our financial instruments
is
not material.
We
are
exposed to currency risk as it relates to certain accounts receivables and
from
our foreign operations. We believe that the currency risk is immaterial to
the
overall presentation of the financial statements.
We
are
exposed to regulatory risk in the fluid purification and agricultural markets,
principally as a result of the risk of increasing regulation of the food chain
in the United States and Europe. We actively monitor developments in this area,
both directly and through trade organizations of which we are a
member.
We
are
exposed to commodity price risk with respect to natural gas. We have contracted
for a portion of our fuel needs for fiscal 2008 using forward purchase contracts
to manage the volatility in fuel prices related to this exposure. The weighted
average cost of the fiscal 2008 contracts has been estimated to be approximately
5% higher than the contracts for fiscal 2007. All contracts were entered into
during the normal course of business and no contracts were entered into for
speculative purposes.
The
tables below provide information about our natural gas purchase contracts,
which
are sensitive to changes in commodity prices, specifically natural gas prices.
For the purchase contracts, the table presents the notional amounts in MMBtu’s,
the weighted average contract prices, and the total dollar contract amount,
which will mature by July 31, 2008. The Fair Value was determined using the
“Most Recent Settle” price for the “Henry Hub Natural Gas” option contract
prices as listed by the New York Mercantile Exchange on November 28,
2007.
Commodity
Price Sensitivity
Natural
Gas Future Contracts
For
the Year Ending July 31, 2008
|
|||||||
Expected
2008 Maturity
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||
Natural
Gas Future Volumes (MMBtu)
|
930,000
|
—
|
|||||
Weighted
Average Price (Per MMBtu)
|
$
|
8.67
|
—
|
||||
Contract
Amount ($ U.S., in thousands)
|
$
|
8,059.4
|
$
|
6,528.7
|
Factors
that could influence the fair value of the natural gas contracts, include,
but
are not limited to, the creditworthiness of our natural gas suppliers, the
overall general economy, developments in world events, and the general demand
for natural gas by the manufacturing sector, seasonality and the weather
patterns throughout the United States and the world. Some of these same events
have allowed us to mitigate the impact of the natural gas contracts by the
continued, and in some cases expanded, use of recycled oil in our manufacturing
processes. Accurate estimates of the impact that these contracts may have on
our
fiscal 2008 financial results are difficult to make due to the inherent
uncertainty of future fluctuations in option contract prices in the natural
gas
options market.
19
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
Form 10-Q. The controls evaluation was conducted under the supervision and
with
the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)
and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Based upon the controls evaluation, our CEO
and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report,
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified by the SEC, and that material information relating to us and our
consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including the CEO and
CFO, during the period when our periodic reports are being
prepared.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2007 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our
management, including the CEO and CFO, do not expect that our disclosure
controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will
prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how
well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that
the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not
occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities
that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur
because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is
based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and
there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation
of
controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration
in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
20
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Items
1,
2, 3, 4 and 5 of this Part II are either inapplicable or are answered in the
negative and are omitted pursuant to the instructions to Part II.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
For
information regarding Risk Factors, please refer to Item 1A in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2007. There have been no material
changes in risk factors since July 31, 2007.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
(a)
|
EXHIBITS:
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
SEC
Document Reference
|
||
10.1
|
Second
Amendment, dated as of October 15, 2007, to Memorandum of Agreement
#1450
“Fresh Step”TM
dated as of March 12, 2001.
|
Filed
herewith. Confidential treatment of certain portions of this exhibit
has
been requested.
|
||
11
|
Statement
re: Computation of Earnings per Share.
|
Filed
herewith.
|
||
31
|
Certifications
pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a).
|
Filed
herewith.
|
||
32
|
Certifications
pursuant to Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Furnished
herewith.
|
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA
(Registrant)
BY /s/ Andrew N. Peterson | |||
Andrew
N. Peterson
|
|||
Vice
President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
BY /s/ Daniel S. Jaffee | |||
Daniel
S. Jaffee
|
|||
President
and
Chief Executive Officer
|
Dated: December 7, 2007
22
EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
10.1
|
Second
Amendment, dated as of October 15, 2007, to Memorandum of Agreement
#1450
“Fresh Step”TM
dated as of March 12, 2001. Confidential treatment of certain portions
of
this exhibit has been requested.
|
|
11
|
Statement
re: Computation of Earnings per Share.
|
|
31
|
Certifications
pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a).
|
|
32
|
Certifications
pursuant to Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Note:
|
Stockholders
may receive copies of the above listed exhibits, without fee, by
written
request to Investor Relations, Oil-Dri Corporation of America, 410
North
Michigan Avenue, Suite 400, Chicago, Illinois 60611-4213.
|
23